Oil-Dri Corp of America - Quarter Report: 2008 October (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D. C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x |
Quarterly
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For
the Quarterly Period Ended October 31,
2008
|
OR
¨ |
Transition
Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the
Securities
Exchange Act of 1934
For
the transition period from _____________ to
______________
|
Commission
File Number 0-8675
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA
(Exact
name of the registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
36-2048898
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
410
North Michigan Avenue, Suite 400
Chicago,
Illinois
|
60611-4213
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
The
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (312) 321-1515
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
at
least the past 90 days.
Yes
þ No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.
See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Accelerated
filer
|
þ
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
¨
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
¨
|
(Do
not check if a smaller reporting company)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
¨ No
þ
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common
stock, as of the close of the period covered by this report.
Common
Stock – 5,111,224 Shares
Class
B
Stock – 1,914,797 Shares
CONTENTS
Page
|
||
PART
I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1:
|
Financial
Statements
|
3
-
14
|
Item
2:
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
|
and
Results Of Operations
|
15
- 21
|
|
Item
3:
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
21
- 22
|
Item
4:
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
23
|
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1A:
|
Risk
Factors
|
24
|
Item
2:
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
24
|
Item
6:
|
Exhibits
|
25
|
Signatures
|
26
|
|
Exhibits
|
27
|
FORWARD-LOOKING
STATEMENTS
Certain
statements in this report, including, but not limited to, those under the
heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of Operations” and those statements elsewhere in this report and other documents
we file with the Commission contain forward-looking statements that are based
on
current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about our future
performance, our business, our beliefs, and our management’s assumptions. In
addition, we, or others on our behalf, may make forward-looking statements
in
press releases or written statements, or in our communications and discussions
with investors and analysts in the normal course of business through meetings,
webcasts, phone calls, and conference calls. Words such as “expect,” “outlook,”
“forecast,” “would”, “could,” “should,” “project,” “intend,” “plan,” “continue,”
“believe,” “seek,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” “believe”, “may,” “assume,”
variations of such words and similar expressions are intended to identify such
forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
Such
statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions that
could cause actual results to differ materially, including those described
in
Item 1A, Risk Factors, of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year
ended July 31, 2008, which risk factors are incorporated herein by reference.
Should one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or
should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary
materially from those anticipated, intended, expected, believed, estimated,
projected or planned. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. Except
to
the extent required by law, we do not have any intention or obligation to update
publicly any forward-looking statements after the distribution of this report,
whether as a result of new information, future events, changes in assumptions,
or otherwise.
TRADEMARK
NOTICE
Oil-Dri,
Agsorb, Cat’s Pride, Jonny Cat, KatKit, ConditionAde, Pelunite, Perform, Select,
Pure-Flo, UltraClear, Poultry Guard, Flo-Fre and Terra Green are all registered
trademarks of Oil-Dri Corporation of America or of its subsidiaries. Pro’s
Choice and Saular are trademarks of Oil-Dri Corporation of America. Fresh Step
is a registered trademark of The Clorox Company.
2
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM
1. Financial Statements
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in
thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
|
October 31,
2008
|
July 31,
2008
|
|||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
Assets
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,308
|
$
|
6,848
|
|||
Investment
in securities
|
15,463
|
20,916
|
|||||
Accounts
receivable, less allowance of $644 and
|
|||||||
$614
at October 31, 2008 and July 31, 2008, respectively
|
32,763
|
31,383
|
|||||
Inventories
|
19,833
|
17,744
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
890
|
890
|
|||||
Prepaid
expenses and other assets
|
5,379
|
4,870
|
|||||
Total
Current Assets
|
75,636
|
82,651
|
|||||
Property,
Plant and Equipment
|
|||||||
Cost
|
157,796
|
155,934
|
|||||
Less
accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(105,019
|
)
|
(104,494
|
)
|
|||
Total
Property, Plant and Equipment, Net
|
52,777
|
51,440
|
|||||
Other
Assets
|
|||||||
Goodwill
|
5,162
|
5,162
|
|||||
Trademarks
and patents, net of accumulated amortization
|
|||||||
of
$356 and $349 at October 31, 2008 and July 31, 2008, respectively
|
734
|
733
|
|||||
Debt
issuance costs, net of accumulated amortization
|
|||||||
of
$544 and $525 at October 31, 2008 and July 31, 2008, respectively
|
319
|
338
|
|||||
Licensing
agreements and non-compete agreements, net of
|
|||||||
accumulated
amortization of $3,083 and $2,987 at
October
31, 2008 and July 31, 2008, respectively
|
1,656
|
1,752
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
2,112
|
2,048
|
|||||
Other
|
4,746
|
4,864
|
|||||
Total
Other Assets
|
14,729
|
14,897
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
143,142
|
$
|
148,988
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
3
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in
thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
|
October 31,
2008
|
July 31,
2008
|
|||||
LIABILITIES
& STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
Liabilities
|
|||||||
Current
maturities of notes payable
|
$
|
1,700
|
$
|
5,580
|
|||
Accounts
payable
|
7,365
|
7,491
|
|||||
Dividends
payable
|
917
|
919
|
|||||
Accrued
expenses:
|
|||||||
Salaries,
wages and commissions
|
3,008
|
5,578
|
|||||
Trade
promotions and advertising
|
2,436
|
2,126
|
|||||
Freight
|
2,185
|
2,345
|
|||||
Other
|
6,208
|
6,062
|
|||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
23,819
|
30,101
|
|||||
Noncurrent
Liabilities
|
|||||||
Notes
payable
|
21,300
|
21,500
|
|||||
Deferred
compensation
|
5,634
|
5,498
|
|||||
Other
|
4,489
|
4,263
|
|||||
Total
Noncurrent Liabilities
|
31,423
|
31,261
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities
|
55,242
|
61,362
|
|||||
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|||||||
Common
Stock, par value $.10 per share, issued
|
|||||||
7,404,200
shares at October 31, 2008 and 7,392,475 shares
at July 31, 2008
|
740
|
739
|
|||||
Class
B Stock, par value $.10 per share, issued
|
|||||||
2,239,538
shares at October 31, 2008 and 2,239,538 shares
at July 31, 2008
|
224
|
224
|
|||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
22,447
|
22,218
|
|||||
Restricted
unearned stock compensation
|
(599
|
)
|
(674
|
)
|
|||
Retained
earnings
|
107,199
|
105,966
|
|||||
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income
|
|||||||
Unrealized
gain on marketable securities
|
52
|
68
|
|||||
Pension
and postretirement benefits
|
(109
|
)
|
(121
|
)
|
|||
Cumulative
translation adjustment
|
(162
|
)
|
612
|
||||
|
129,792
|
129,032
|
|||||
Less
Treasury Stock, at cost (2,292,976 Common and 324,741
|
|||||||
Class
B shares at October 31, 2008 and 2,261,942 Common and
|
|||||||
324,741
Class B shares at July 31, 2008)
|
(41,892
|
)
|
(41,406
|
)
|
|||
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
87,900
|
87,626
|
|||||
Total
Liabilities & Stockholders’ Equity
|
$
|
143,142
|
$
|
148,988
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
4
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Income and Retained Earnings
(in
thousands, except for per share amounts)
(unaudited)
For The Three Months Ended
October 31
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Net
Sales
|
$
|
63,128
|
$
|
55,285
|
|||
Cost
of Sales
|
(50,752
|
)
|
(42,855
|
)
|
|||
Gross
Profit
|
12,376
|
12,430
|
|||||
Selling,
General and Administrative Expenses
|
(8,738
|
)
|
(8,860
|
)
|
|||
Income
from Operations
|
3,638
|
3,570
|
|||||
Other
Income (Expense)
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
(505
|
)
|
(547
|
)
|
|||
Interest
income
|
165
|
368
|
|||||
Other,
net
|
(221
|
)
|
62
|
||||
Total
Other Income (Expense), Net
|
(561
|
)
|
(144
|
)
|
|||
Income
Before Income Taxes
|
3,077
|
3,426
|
|||||
Income
taxes
|
(831
|
)
|
(942
|
)
|
|||
Net
Income
|
2,246
|
2,484
|
|||||
Retained
Earnings
|
|||||||
Balance
at beginning of year
|
105,966
|
100,503
|
|||||
Cash
dividends declared and treasury stock issuances
|
(1,013
|
)
|
(843
|
)
|
|||
Retained
Earnings – October 31
|
$
|
107,199
|
$
|
102,144
|
|||
Net
Income Per Share
|
|||||||
Basic
Common
|
$
|
0.34
|
$
|
0.38
|
|||
Basic
Class B
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
0.31
|
|||
Diluted
|
$
|
0.31
|
$
|
0.35
|
|||
Average
Shares Outstanding
|
|||||||
Basic
Common
|
5,128
|
5,004
|
|||||
Basic
Class B
|
1,862
|
1,840
|
|||||
Diluted
|
7,245
|
7,145
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
5
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
(in
thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
For The Three Months Ended
October 31
|
|||||||
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
2,246
|
$
|
2,484
|
|||
Other
Comprehensive Income:
|
|||||||
Unrealized
(loss) gain on marketable securities
|
(16
|
)
|
26
|
||||
Pension
and postretirement benefits
|
12
|
6
|
|||||
Cumulative
translation adjustment
|
(774
|
)
|
447
|
||||
Total
Comprehensive Income
|
$
|
1,468
|
$
|
2,963
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
6
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in
thousands of dollars)
(unaudited)
For The Three Months
Ended October 31
|
|||||||
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES | |||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
2,246
|
$
|
2,484
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash
|
|||||||
provided
by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,885
|
1,862
|
|||||
Amortization
of investment discount
|
(75
|
)
|
(248
|
)
|
|||
Non-cash
stock compensation expense
|
159
|
245
|
|||||
Excess
tax benefits for share-based payments
|
(61
|
)
|
(158
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
income taxes
|
(11
|
)
|
21
|
||||
Provision
for bad debts
|
37
|
59
|
|||||
Loss
on the sale of fixed assets
|
1
|
37
|
|||||
(Increase)
Decrease in:
|
|
||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(1,417
|
)
|
295
|
||||
Inventories
|
(2,089
|
)
|
(2,299
|
)
|
|||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(509
|
)
|
(654
|
)
|
|||
Other
assets
|
(1,081
|
)
|
514
|
||||
Increase
(Decrease) in:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
(118
|
)
|
296
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(2,274
|
)
|
(2,606
|
)
|
|||
Deferred
compensation
|
136
|
92
|
|||||
Other
liabilities
|
589
|
64
|
|||||
Total
Adjustments
|
(4,828
|
)
|
(2,480
|
)
|
|||
Net
Cash (Used in) Provided by Operating Activities
|
(2,582
|
)
|
4
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(3,552
|
)
|
(2,147
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of property, plant and equipment
|
8
|
—
|
|||||
Purchases
of investment securities
|
(28,972
|
)
|
(30,208
|
)
|
|||
Dispositions
of investment securities
|
34,500
|
26,000
|
|||||
Net
Cash Provided by (Used in) Investing Activities
|
1,984
|
(6,355
|
)
|
||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Principal
payments on notes payable
|
(4,080
|
)
|
(80
|
)
|
|||
Dividends
paid
|
(919
|
)
|
(834
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of treasury stock
|
(644
|
)
|
—
|
||||
Proceeds
from issuance of treasury stock
|
63
|
—
|
|||||
Proceeds
from issuance of common stock
|
83
|
593
|
|||||
Excess
tax benefits for share-based payments
|
61
|
158
|
|||||
Other,
net
|
(331
|
)
|
158
|
||||
Net
Cash Used in Financing Activities
|
(5,767
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
|||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
825
|
(407
|
)
|
||||
Net
Decrease in Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
(5,540
|
)
|
(6,763
|
)
|
|||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, Beginning of Year
|
6,848
|
12,133
|
|||||
Cash
and Cash Equivalents, October 31
|
$
|
1,308
|
$
|
5,370
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
7
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA & SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
To Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
(Unaudited)
1.
BASIS
OF
STATEMENT PRESENTATION
The
accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for interim financial information and
with instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly,
they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. GAAP
for complete financial statements. The financial statements and the related
notes are condensed and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes for the year ended July 31, 2008 included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts
of
the parent company and its subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
transactions are eliminated.
The
unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments,
consisting of normal recurring accruals, which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of the statements contained
herein. Operating results for the three months ended October 31, 2008 are not
necessarily an indication of the results that may be expected for the fiscal
year ending July 31, 2009.
The
preparation of the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in
conformity with U.S. GAAP requires the use of estimates and assumptions related
to the reporting of assets, liabilities, revenues, expenses and related
disclosures. Estimates are revised periodically. Actual results could differ
from these estimates.
Under
the
terms of our sales agreements with customers, we recognize revenue when title
is
transferred. Upon shipment an invoice is generated that sets the fixed and
determinable price. Promotional reserves are provided for sales incentives
made
directly to consumers and customers and are netted against sales. Sales returns
and allowances have historically not been material. Selling, general and
administrative expenses include salaries, wages and benefits associated with
staff outside the manufacturing and distribution functions, all marketing
related costs, any miscellaneous trade spending expenses not required to be
included in net sales, research and development costs and all other
non-manufacturing and non-distribution expenses.
We
evaluate our allowance for doubtful accounts utilizing a combination of a
historical experience and a periodic review of our accounts receivable aging
and
specific customer account analysis. A customer is determined to be uncollectible
when we have completed our internal collection procedures, including termination
of shipments, direct customer contact and formal demand of payment. We maintain
and monitor a list of customers whose creditworthiness has diminished. We will
continue to monitor customer creditworthiness given the recent economic credit
crisis.
As
part
of our overall operations, we mine sorbent materials on property that we either
own or lease. A significant part of our overall mining cost is incurred during
the process of removing the overburden (non-usable material) from the mine
site,
thus exposing the sorbent material that is then used in a majority of our
production processes. In accordance with EITF Issue No. 04-06, Accounting
for Stripping Costs Incurred during Production in the Mining
Industry,
production stripping costs are treated as a variable inventory production cost
and are included in cost of sales in the period they are incurred. We defer
and
amortize the pre-production overburden removal costs associated with opening
a
new mine.
During
the normal course of our overburden removal activities we perform on-going
reclamation activities. As overburden is removed from a pit, it is hauled to
previously mined pits and used to refill older sites. This process allows us
to
continuously reclaim older pits and dispose of overburden simultaneously,
therefore minimizing the liability for the reclamation function.
Additionally,
it is our policy to capitalize the purchase cost of land and mineral rights,
including associated legal fees, survey fees and real estate fees. The costs
of
obtaining mineral patents, including legal fees and drilling expenses, are
also
capitalized. Pre-production development costs on new mines and any prepaid
royalties that can be offset against future royalties due upon extraction of
the
mineral are also capitalized. All exploration related costs are expensed as
incurred.
8
2.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of SFAS No. 133
(“SFAS
161”).
This
Statement requires disclosures of how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
early application encouraged. We will adopt this Statement as of February 1,
2009, the beginning of our third quarter of our fiscal year ending July 31,
2009. We are currently evaluating the impact this Statement will have on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51
(“SFAS
160”).
This
statement establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. SFAS 160 requires the noncontrolling interest to be reported as
a
component of equity, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent
retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions, and
any retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We will adopt this Statement
as of August 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact this Statement
will
have on our consolidated financial statements.
In
June
2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities (“FSP
EITF 03-6-1). This FSP states that unvested share-based payment awards that
contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether
paid
or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation
of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The FSP is effective
for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008,
and interim periods within those years. Upon adoption, a company is required
to
retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data (including any amounts
related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data)
to conform to the provisions in this FSP. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We
will adopt this FSP as of August 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact
FSP EITF 03-6-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
3.
RECENTLY
ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, Fair
Value Measurements (“SFAS
157). This Statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and
expands disclosures about fair value measurements. In February 2008, SFAS 157
was amended by FASB Staff Positions (“FSP”) SFAS No. 157-1 Application
of FASB Statement No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting
Pronouncements That Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease
Classification or Measurement under Statement 13 (“FSP
SFAS 157-1”) and by FSP SFAS No. 157-2 Effective
Date of FASB Statement No. 157 (“FSP
SFAS 157-2”). FSP SFAS 157-1 amends SFAS 157 to exclude FASB Statement No. 13,
Accounting
for Leases (“SFAS
13”) and
other
accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes
of
lease classification or measurement under SFAS 13.
FSP SFAS
157-2 delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for
nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until November 15, 2008, except
for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the financial
statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). In October 2008, SFAS
157
was further amended by FSP SFAS No. 157-3 (“FSP SFAS 157-3”) Determining
the Fair Value of a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset is Not
Active.
FSP
SFAS 157-3 was effective upon issuance and clarifies the application of SFAS
157
in a market that is not active and provides an example. See Note 5 for the
description of our adoption of the nondelayed portions of SFAS 157.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued FASB Statement No. 159, The
Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
(“SFAS
159”). SFAS 159 permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value. The objective of SFAS 159 is to improve
financial reporting by mitigating volatility in reported earnings caused by
measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply
complex hedge accounting provisions. We adopted this Statement as of
August 1, 2008. We did not elect the Fair Value Option for any of our
financial assets or liabilities, and therefore, the adoption of FAS 159 had
no
impact on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or cash
flows.
In
June
2007, the EITF reached consensus on Issue No. 06-11, Accounting
for Income Tax Benefits of Dividends on Share-Based Payment
Awards
(“EITF
06-11”). EITF 06-11 requires that the tax benefit related to dividend and
dividend equivalents paid on equity-classified nonvested shares and nonvested
share units, which are expected to vest, be recorded as an increase to
additional paid-in capital. EITF 06-11 was to be applied prospectively for
tax
benefits on dividends declared in our fiscal year beginning August 1, 2008.
The adoption of EITF 06-11 had an insignificant impact on our consolidated
financial position, results of operations and cash flows.
9
4.
INVENTORIES
The
composition of inventories is as follows (in thousands of dollars):
October
31,
|
July
31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2008
|
||||||
Finished
goods
|
$
|
12,306
|
$
|
10,076
|
|||
Packaging
|
3,942
|
3,798
|
|||||
Other
|
3,585
|
3,870
|
|||||
$
|
19,833
|
$
|
17,744
|
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out) or market. Inventory
costs
include the cost of raw materials, packaging supplies, labor and other overhead
costs. We perform a quarterly review of our inventory items to determine if
an
obsolescence reserve adjustment is necessary. The review surveys all of our
operating facilities and sales groups
to
ensure that both historical issues and new market trends are considered. The
allowance not only considers specific items, but also takes into consideration
the overall value of the inventory as of the balance sheet date. The inventory
obsolescence reserve values at October 31, 2008 and July 31, 2008 were $177,000
and $138,000, respectively.
5. FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
We
adopted the required portions of SFAS 157, as amended, on August 1, 2008. SFAS
157 applies to all assets and liabilities that are being measured and reported
at fair value. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received
to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction
between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 establishes a
fair
value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to
measure fair value. An asset or liability’s level is based on the lowest level
of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. This Statement
requires that financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value be
classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level 1: |
Financial
assets and liabilities whose values are based on quoted market prices
in
active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
|
Level 2: |
Financial
assets and liabilities whose values are based
on:
|
1)
|
Quoted
prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets.
|
2)
|
Quoted
prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets
that are
not active.
|
3)
|
Valuation
models whose inputs are observable, directly or indirectly, for
substantially the full term of the asset or
liability.
|
Level 3: |
Financial
assets and liabilities whose values are based on valuation techniques
that
require inputs that are both unobservable and significant to the
overall
fair value measurement. These inputs may reflect estimates of the
assumptions that market participants would use in valuing the financial
assets and liabilities.
|
The
following table summarizes our financial assets and liabilities that were
measured at fair value by level within the fair value hierarchy:
Fair Value at October 31, 2008
(in thousands)
|
||||||||||
Total
|
Level 1
|
Level 2
|
||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
1,308
|
$
|
1,308
|
$
|
—
|
||||
Marketable
equity securities
|
55
|
55
|
—
|
|||||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
3,498
|
—
|
3,498
|
Cash
and
cash equivalents are classified as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy because
they were valued using quoted market prices in active markets. These cash
instruments are money market mutual funds and U.S. Treasury
securities.
10
Marketable
equity securities were valued using quoted market prices in active markets
and
as such are classified as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. These securities
represent stock we own in one publicly traded company.
Cash
surrender value of life insurance is classified as Level 2. The value was
determined by the underwriting insurance company’s valuation models and
represents the guaranteed value we would receive upon surrender of these
policies as of October 31, 2008. These life insurance policies are held on
key
employees.
We
generally apply fair value techniques on a non-recurring basis associated with:
1) valuing potential impairment loss related to goodwill and indefinite-lived
intangible assets account for pursuant to SFAS No. 142 Goodwill
and other Intangible Assets and
2)
valuing potential impairment loss related to long-lived asses accounted for
pursuant to SFAS No. 144 Accounting
for Impairment and Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.
6. PENSION
AND OTHER POST RETIREMENT BENEFITS
The
components of net periodic pension benefits cost of our sponsored defined
benefit plans were as follows:
PENSION PLANS
(dollars in thousands)
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
October 31,
2008
|
October 31,
2007
|
||||||
Components
of net periodic pension benefit cost:
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
210
|
$
|
212
|
|||
Interest
cost
|
334
|
292
|
|||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(325
|
)
|
(347
|
)
|
|||
Net
amortization
|
12
|
49
|
|||||
$
|
231
|
$
|
206
|
We
have
funded the plan based upon actuarially determined contributions that take into
account the amount deductible for income tax purposes, the normal cost and
the
minimum contribution required and the maximum contribution allowed under the
Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, as amended. We did not make
a
contribution to our pension plan during the first quarter of the fiscal year
ending July 31, 2009. We intend to make a contribution to the pension plan
during the current fiscal year approximately equal to the annual actuarial
determined cost. We currently estimate this amount to be approximately $900,000.
See Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk for
a
discussion of the potential impact of financial market fluctuations on pension
plan assets and future funding contributions.
The
components of the net periodic postretirement health benefit cost were as
follows:
POST RETIREMENT
HEALTH BENEFITS
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
October 31,
2008
|
October 31,
2007
|
||||||
(dollars in thousands)
|
|||||||
Components
of net periodic postretirement benefit cost
|
|||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
16
|
$
|
17
|
|||
Interest
cost
|
23
|
18
|
|||||
Amortization
of net transition obligation
|
4
|
4
|
|||||
Net
actuarial loss
|
3
|
7
|
|||||
$
|
46
|
$
|
46
|
Our
plan
covering postretirement health benefits is an unfunded plan.
11
Assumptions
used in the previous calculations were as follows:
PENSION PLAN
|
POST RETIREMENT
HEALTH BENEFITS
|
||||||||||||
For three months ended:
|
|||||||||||||
October 31,
2008
|
October 31,
2007
|
October 31,
2008
|
October 31,
2007
|
||||||||||
Discount
rate for net periodic benefit cost
|
7.00
|
%
|
6.25
|
%
|
7.00
|
%
|
6.25
|
%
|
|||||
Rate
of increase in compensation levels
|
4.00
|
%
|
4.00
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Long-term
expected rate of return on assets
|
7.50
|
%
|
8.00
|
%
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||
Measurement
date
|
7/31/2008
|
7/31/2007
|
7/31/2008
|
7/31/2007
|
|||||||||
Census
date
|
8/1/2007
|
8/1/2006
|
8/1/2007
|
8/1/2006
|
The
medical cost trend assumption for postretirement health benefits was a graded
rate starting at 10% and decreasing to an ultimate rate of 5% in 1% annual
increments.
7.SEGMENT
REPORTING
SFAS
No.
131, Disclosures
About Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information
establishes standards for reporting information about operating segments. Under
this standard, we have two reportable operating segments: Retail and Wholesale
Products and Business to Business Products. These segments are managed
separately because each business has different customer characteristics. Net
sales and operating income for each segment are provided below. Revenues by
product line are not provided because it would be impracticable to do
so.
The
accounting policies of the segments are the same as those described in Note
1 of
the consolidated financial statements included in our Annual Report on Form
10-K
for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
Management
does not rely on any segment asset allocations and does not consider them
meaningful because of the shared nature of our production facilities; however,
we have estimated the segment asset allocations as follows:
Assets
|
|||||||
October 31,
|
July 31,
|
||||||
2008
|
2008
|
||||||
(in
thousands)
|
|||||||
Business
to Business Products
|
$
|
39,855
|
$
|
38,026
|
|||
Retail
and Wholesale Products
|
67,315
|
66,838
|
|||||
Unallocated
Assets
|
35,972
|
44,124
|
|||||
Total
Assets
|
$
|
143,142
|
$
|
148,988
|
Three Months Ended October 31,
|
|||||||||||||
Net Sales
|
Operating Income
|
||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||||||
(in thousands)
|
|||||||||||||
Business
to Business Products
|
$
|
20,645
|
$
|
16,917
|
$
|
4,426
|
$
|
4,001
|
|||||
Retail
and Wholesale Products
|
42,483
|
38,368
|
3,162
|
4,350
|
|||||||||
Total
Sales/Operating Income
|
$
|
63,128
|
$
|
55,
285
|
7,588
|
8,351
|
|||||||
Less:
|
|||||||||||||
Corporate
Expenses
|
4,171
|
4,719
|
|||||||||||
Interest
Expense, net of Interest Income
|
340
|
206
|
|||||||||||
Income
before Income Taxes
|
3,077
|
3,426
|
|||||||||||
Income
Taxes
|
(831
|
)
|
(942
|
)
|
|||||||||
Net
Income
|
$
|
2,246
|
$
|
2,484
|
12
8.
STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
We
adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004),
Share-Based
Payments
(“SFAS
123R”) in the first quarter of fiscal 2006. In accordance with this
pronouncement, we record compensation expense for all awards granted after
the
date of adoption and for the unvested portion of previously granted awards
that
remain outstanding at the date of adoption. The stock-based compensation expense
in the first three months of fiscal years 2009 and 2008 is the cost related
to
the unvested portion of grants issued after August 1, 2000 and grants issued
after July 31, 2005. The stock options granted before August 1, 2000 were fully
vested as of the beginning of fiscal 2006.
Stock
Options
Our
1995
Long Term Incentive Plan (the “1995 Plan”) provided for grants of both incentive
and non-qualified stock options principally at an option price per share of
100%
of the fair market value of our Class A Common Stock or, if no Class A Common
Stock is outstanding, our Common Stock (“Stock”) on the date of grant. Stock
options were generally granted with a five-year vesting period and a 10-year
term. The stock options generally vest 25% two years after the grant date and
25% in each of the three following anniversaries of the grant date. This plan
expired for purposes of issuing new grants on August 5, 2005. All stock issued
from option exercises under this plan were from authorized but unissued stock.
All restricted stock issued was from treasury stock.
On
March
14, 2006, our Board of Directors unanimously approved adoption of the Oil-Dri
Corporation of America 2006 Long Term Incentive Plan; our Board amended and
restated the plan following the five-for-four stock split described below (as
so
amended and restated, the “2006 Plan”). The 2006 Plan was approved by our
stockholders at our annual meeting on December 5, 2006. The 2006 Plan permits
the grant of stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock,
restricted stock units, performance awards and other stock-based and cash-based
awards. Our employees and non-employee directors are eligible to receive
grants under the 2006 Plan. The total number of shares of Stock subject to
grants under the 2006 Plan may not exceed 919,500. Option grants covering 25,000
shares were issued to our outside directors with a vesting period of one year
and option grants covering 32,500 shares were issued to employees with vesting
similar to the vesting described above under the 1995 Plan. There were 90,000
shares of restricted stock issued under the 2006 Plan.
The
Oil-Dri Corporation of America Outside Director Stock Plan (the “Directors’
Plan”) provides for grants of stock options to our directors at an option price
per share of 100% of the fair market value of Common Stock on the date of grant.
Our directors are considered employees under the provisions of SFAS 123R. Stock
options have been granted to our directors for a 10-year term with a one year
vesting period. There are 71,450 stock options outstanding as of October 31,
2008 and no stock options available for future grants under this plan. All
stock
issued under this plan were from treasury stock.
A
five-for-four stock split was announced by our Board on June 6, 2006. In keeping
with historical practices, we have adjusted the number of shares and the option
prices to equitably adjust all outstanding stock options. Under SFAS 123R,
the
equitable adjustment of outstanding options to reflect a change in
capitalization (such as a stock split) may require the recognition of
incremental compensation expense if the adjustment is not determined to have
been required by the actual terms of the equity incentive plan. The Directors’
Plan and the 1995 Plan may be deemed to have been discretionary, rather than
required by the actual terms of these plans. We therefore recognized additional
stock-based compensation expense as a result of the modification of
approximately $51,000 and $111,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 and
2008,
respectively.
There
were no stock options granted in the first three months of fiscal years 2009
or
2008.
13
Changes
in our stock options during the first three months of fiscal 2009 were as
follows:
Number
of Shares
(in
thousands)
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contractual
Term
(Years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value (in
thousands)
|
||||||||||
Options
outstanding, July 31, 2008
|
624
|
$
|
8.66
|
4.4
|
$
|
5,345
|
|||||||
Exercised
|
(21
|
)
|
$
|
6.20
|
$
|
234
|
|||||||
Cancelled
|
(15
|
)
|
$
|
8.32
|
$
|
123
|
|||||||
Options
outstanding, October 31, 2008
|
588
|
$
|
8.76
|
4.3
|
$
|
4,589
|
|||||||
Options
exercisable, October 31, 2008
|
544
|
$
|
8.23
|
4.1
|
$
|
4,522
|
The
amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options during the first
quarter of fiscal 2009 was $133,000 and the related tax benefit was $63,000.
The
amount of cash received from the exercise of stock options during the first
quarter of fiscal 2008 was $593,000 and the related tax benefit was
$158,000.
Restricted
Stock
Our
1995
Plan and 2006 Plan both provide for grants of restricted stock. The vesting
schedule under the 1995 Plan has varied, but has generally been three years
or
less. Under the 2006 Plan, the grants issued so far have vesting periods between
three and five years.
Included
in our stock-based compensation expense in the first quarter of fiscal years
2009 and 2008 was $75,000 and $83,000, respectively, related to the unvested
restricted stock granted in fiscal years 2005 and 2006. No shares of restricted
stock were granted in the first three months of fiscal 2009 or
2008.
Changes
in our restricted stock outstanding during the first three months of fiscal
2009
were as follows:
(shares in thousands)
|
|||||||
Restricted
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
||||||
Unvested
restricted stock at July 31, 2008
|
55
|
$
|
15.42
|
||||
Vested
|
(1
|
)
|
|||||
Unvested
restricted stock at October 31, 2008
|
54
|
$
|
15.42
|
14
ITEM 2. |
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF
FINANCIAL
CONDITION AND RESULTS OF
OPERATIONS
|
The
following discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of
operations should be read together with the financial statements and the related
notes included herein and our consolidated financial statements, accompanying
notes and Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and
Results of Operations contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year
ended July 31, 2008. This discussion contains forward-looking statements that
involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from
the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might
cause a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed under
“Forward-Looking Statements” and Item 1A (Risk Factors) of our Annual Report on
Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008.
OVERVIEW
We
develop, manufacture and market sorbent products principally produced from
clay
minerals and, to a lesser extent, other sorbent materials. Our principal
products include cat litter, industrial and automotive absorbents, bleaching
clay and clarification aids, agricultural chemical carriers, animal health
and
nutrition and sports field products. Our products are sold to two primary
customer groups, including customers who resell our products as originally
produced to the end customer and those who use our products as part of their
production process or use them as an ingredient in their final finished product.
We have two reportable segments, the Retail and Wholesale Products Group and
the
Business to Business Products Group, as described in Note 7 of the unaudited
condensed consolidated financial statements.
RESULTS
OF OPERATIONS
THREE
MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2008 COMPARED TO
THREE
MONTHS ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2007
Consolidated
net sales for the three months ended October 31, 2008 were $63,128,000, an
increase of 14% from net sales of $55,285,000 in the first three months of
fiscal 2008. Net income for the first three months of fiscal 2009 was
$2,246,000, a decrease of 10% from net income of $2,484,000 in the first three
months of fiscal 2008. Diluted income per share for the first three months
of
fiscal 2009 was $0.31 versus $0.35 diluted net income per share for the first
three months of fiscal 2008.
Net
income for the first three months of fiscal 2009 was positively impacted by
a
higher average net selling price and increased tons sold. Net income was
negatively affected by higher costs. Selling prices have increased to contend
with higher costs incurred throughout our business, and particularly in freight,
materials and packaging. Freight costs increased significantly due to high
fuel
prices which impacted our truck, rail and ship distribution channels. Material
costs were driven upward by the high cost of fuel used to dry our clay-based
products and to transport raw materials. The cost of other purchased materials
also increased. Packaging costs rose due to price increases in the resin and
paper markets. The Business to Business Group experienced improved net income
as
higher net selling prices and increased volume overcame increased costs;
however, in the Retail and Wholesale Group the higher costs prevailed over
increases in both net selling prices and tons sold.
BUSINESS
TO BUSINESS PRODUCTS GROUP
Net
sales
of the Business to Business Products Group for the first three months of fiscal
2009 were $20,645,000, an increase of $3,728,000 from net sales of $16,917,000
in the first three months of fiscal 2008. This increase is attributed to a
higher net selling price and a 4% increase in tons sold for the Group compared
to the first three months of fiscal 2008. Net selling prices and tons sold
were
up for fluid purification products, co-packaged cat litter products and
agricultural chemical carriers. Net sales of bleaching earth and fluid
purification products were up 24% with 11% higher tons sold. The higher tonnage
was the result of increased business opportunities in both domestic and export
markets and in the biodiesel production industry. Our co-packaged traditional
coarse cat litter net sales increased 22% accompanied by an 8% increase in
tons
sold. Promotion of a new product by our co-packaging partner resulted in higher
sales volume. Net sales of agricultural chemical carriers were up 64% and tons
sold increased 23%. Higher selling prices contributed to the sales increase,
along with increased volume of higher priced products. Some of the volume
increase was related to earlier purchases by certain customers in fiscal 2009
compared to fiscal 2008. The volume increase of agricultural chemical products
experienced in the first quarter may not be sustained throughout the remainder
of fiscal 2009. Net sales of Flo-Fre (a by-product of the manufacture of our
agricultural chemical carriers), sports products and animal health and nutrition
products also benefited from selling price increases that offset small declines
in volume for these products.
15
The
Business to Business Products Group’s segment income increased 11% from
$4,001,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008 to $4,426,000 in the first
three months of fiscal 2009. Higher net selling prices and increased tons sold
offset an approximately 21% increase in combined freight, materials and
packaging costs. Freight costs increased approximately 35% primarily due to
higher diesel fuel prices. Material costs were impacted by increased
energy-related costs in our mining and manufacturing processes which resulted
in
approximately a 19% cost increase. Selling, general and administrative expenses
for the Group were up due to increased product development and marketing costs
associated with the launch of new animal health and nutrition
products.
RETAIL
AND WHOLESALE PRODUCTS GROUP
Net
sales
of the Retail and Wholesale Products Group for the first three months of fiscal
2009 were $42,483,000, an increase of $4,115,000 from net sales of $38,368,000
reported in the first three months of fiscal 2008. The net sales growth was
driven by increases in both net selling prices and tons sold. The Group’s total
tons sold were up 6% compared to the first three months of fiscal 2008,
including a 7% increase in cat litter tons. Net sales of private label cat
litter increased 21% due to 13% more tons sold and a higher net selling price.
The higher volume was the result of expanded distribution to existing customers,
as well as distribution to new customers. Net sales of branded cat litter also
increased 8% due to higher net selling prices that offset a 4% decline in volume
primarily due to the loss of a customer. Industrial absorbents net sales were
also up 20% due to 6% higher volume. Volume increased due to new customers
and
additional sales to existing customers.
The
Retail and Wholesale Products Group’s segment income decreased 27% to $3,162,000
in the first three months of fiscal 2009 from $4,350,000 in the first three
months of fiscal 2008. The Group’s combined freight, materials and packaging
costs increased approximately 8% from the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Freight
costs were up approximately 12% and material costs increased approximately
8%
for the reasons described above for the Business to Business Products Group.
Package costs for the Retail and Wholesale Products Group were also up about
5%
due to the higher costs in the resin and paper markets. Selling, general and
administrative expenses for the Group were up due to higher advertising costs.
CONSOLIDATED
RESULTS
Our
consolidated gross profit as a percentage of net sales for the first three
months of fiscal 2009 was 20% compared to 23% in the first three months of
fiscal 2008. Higher net selling prices did not overcome increased fuel,
manufacturing, freight, material and packaging costs. The cost of fuel used
in
the manufacturing process was 46% higher in the first quarter of fiscal 2009
compared to the first quarter of fiscal 2008. Gross profit was further reduced
by an 11% increase in non-fuel manufacturing costs. Significant manufacturing
cost increases were in labor, non-kiln fuel, repairs and purchased materials.
We
use
natural gas, fuel oil and coal in the manufacturing process to operate kilns
that dry our clay. As described in Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk below, we have contracted for a substantial
portion of our planned fuel needs for fiscal 2009. Despite recent market price
decreases in some energy-related commodities, we anticipate that fuel costs
incurred during fiscal 2009 will continue to exceed costs in fiscal
2008.
Selling,
general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales for the first
three months of fiscal 2009 were 14% compared to 16% in the first three months
of fiscal 2008. Expenses in the first three months of fiscal
2009 included a lower estimated annual incentive plan bonus accrual, outside
legal services and stock compensation expense. The lower incentive bonus expense
was based on performance targets that are established for each year. Stock
compensation expense declined as existing grants were fully expensed and no
new
grants were issued. These lower costs were partially offset by increased
spending for research, development and advertising relating to new and existing
products.
Interest
expense was $69,000 less for the first three months of fiscal 2009 compared
to
the same period in fiscal 2008 due to continued debt reduction. Interest income
was $203,000 lower in the first three months of fiscal 2009 primarily due to
a
lower
average interest rate and a lower average investment balance.
Our
effective tax rate was 27% of pre-tax income in the first quarter of fiscal
2009
compared to 26% for the full year of fiscal 2008. The effective tax rate is
based on the projected composition of our taxable income for fiscal
2009.
Total
assets decreased $5,846,000 or 4% during the first three months of fiscal 2009.
Current assets decreased $7,015,000 or 8% from fiscal 2008 year-end balances,
primarily due to a decrease in cash and cash equivalents and investments in
Treasury securities. These decreases were partially offset by increases in
inventories, accounts receivable and prepaid expenses. The changes in current
assets are described below in Liquidity and Capital Resources. Property, plant
and equipment, net of accumulated depreciation, increased $1,337,000 during
the
first three months of fiscal 2009 due to the purchase of land and an increase
in
capital projects at our manufacturing facilities.
16
Total
liabilities decreased $6,120,000 or 10% during the first three months of fiscal
2009. Current liabilities decreased $6,282,000 or 21% primarily due to decreased
current maturities of notes payable, accrued salaries, accrued freight and
accounts payable. Increases in accrued trade promotions and other accrued
expenses partially offset these decreases. The changes in current liabilities
are described below in Liquidity and Capital Resources. Non-current liabilities
increased $162,000 or 1% due to a higher pension accrual and deferred
compensation liabilities. The accrued pension liability is based on the most
recent actuarial estimates. The increase in the deferred compensation liability
is due to ongoing deferrals and accrued interest. These increases were partially
offset by a decrease in notes payable due to the reclassification from long-term
to current.
FOREIGN
OPERATIONS
Net
sales
by our foreign subsidiaries during the first three months of fiscal 2009 were
$3,870,000 or 6% of our consolidated net sales. This represents a decrease
of
14% from the first three months of fiscal 2008, in which foreign subsidiary
sales were $4,492,000 or 8% of our consolidated net sales. Net sales decreased
in both our Canadian and United Kingdom subsidiaries. Canadian cat litter sales
were down due to the loss of a customer. Industrial absorbent sales were down
for both subsidiaries primarily due to the worldwide economic slowdown. In
addition, both the British Pound and the Canadian Dollar were weaker against
the
U.S. Dollar for the first quarter of fiscal 2009 compared to the first quarter
of fiscal 2008, which resulted in lower sales values after translation to U.S.
Dollars for the first quarter of fiscal 2009. For the first three months of
fiscal 2009, our foreign subsidiaries reported a net loss of $179,000, a
decrease of $502,000 from the $323,000 net income reported in the first three
months of fiscal 2008. The lower sales and currency translation loss described
above contributed to the lower net income.
Identifiable
assets of our foreign subsidiaries as of October 31, 2008 were $9,912,000
compared to $10,251,000 as of October 31, 2007. The decrease is primarily due
to
the weaker value of both the British Pound and Canadian Dollar compared to
the
U.S. Dollar as of October 31, 2008 versus October 31, 2007. This exchange rate
fluctuation resulted in lower asset values translated to U.S. Dollars as of
October 31, 2008, particularly for fixed assets and accounts
receivable.
LIQUIDITY
AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
Our
principal capital requirements include funding working capital needs, the
purchasing and upgrading of real estate, equipment and facilities, funding
new
product development and investing in infrastructure and potential acquisitions.
We principally have used cash generated from operations and, to the extent
needed, issuance of debt securities and borrowings under our credit facilities
to fund these requirements. Cash and cash equivalents decreased $5,540,000
during the first three months of fiscal 2009 to $1,308,000 at October 31,
2008.
The
following table sets forth certain elements of our unaudited condensed
consolidated statements of cash flows (in thousands):
Three Months Ended
|
|||||||
October 31,
2008
|
October 31,
2007
|
||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
|
$
|
(2,582
|
)
|
$
|
4
|
||
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
1,984
|
(6,355
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(5,767
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
|||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
825
|
(407
|
)
|
||||
Net
(decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
$
|
(5,540
|
)
|
$
|
(6,763
|
)
|
Net
cash (used in) provided by operating activities
Net
cash
used in operations was $2,582,000 for the first three months of fiscal 2009,
compared to cash provided by operations of $4,000 for the first three months
of
fiscal 2008. The decrease was due primarily to changes in working capital and
lower net income. For the first three months of fiscal years 2009 and 2008,
the
primary components of working capital that impacted operating cash flows were
as
follows:
Inventories
increased $2,089,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2009 versus an increase
of $2,299,000 in the same period in fiscal 2008. Finished goods and packaging
inventories increased in the first three months of fiscal 2009 primarily due
to
higher costs and normal operational fluctuations. Inventories increased in
the
first three months of fiscal 2008 in an effort to build finished goods inventory
to meet future demand of specific products and to level production.
17
Accounts
receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts, increased by $1,380,000 in
the
first three months of fiscal 2009 versus a decrease of $354,000 in the first
three months of fiscal 2008. Sales in the first quarter of both fiscal years
were higher compared to sales in the fourth quarter of the preceding fiscal
year. The comparative sales increase was greater for the first quarter of fiscal
2009 resulting in a larger increase in accounts receivable. The change in both
years is also subject to timing of sales and collections and ongoing efforts
to
improve collection procedures. The quality of our accounts receivable in terms
of aging and days sales outstanding has not diminished as of October 31, 2008
compared to October 31, 2007.
Other
assets increased $1,081,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 versus a
decrease of $514,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. The change in other
assets includes the effect of currency exchange rate fluctuations on non-cash
assets held by our foreign subsidiaries. The change in the relative value of
the
U.S. Dollar to both the British Pound and the Canadian Dollar was greater in
the
first three months of fiscal 2009 compared to the same period of fiscal 2008.
Additionally, in the first quarter of fiscal 2009, the U.S. Dollar increased
in
value compared to these two currencies, while in the first quarter of fiscal
2008 the U.S. Dollar declined in comparative value.
Other
prepaid expenses increased $509,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2009
versus an increase of $654,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008. The
timing of insurance premium payments resulted in an increase in prepaid expenses
in both years.
Accrued
expenses decreased $2,274,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2009 versus
a
decrease of $2,606,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008. The decrease
in
both years was primarily due to the payout of the prior fiscal year’s
discretionary bonus accrual and lower accrued interest due to payments on
long-term debt. Partially offsetting this decrease in both years were higher
trade spending and advertising accruals due to the timing of promotional
activities and higher accruals for energy-related costs. For the first three
months of fiscal 2008, this decrease was further offset by a higher freight
expense accrual due to higher freight costs and the timing of shipments at
quarter-end.
Other
liabilities increased $589,000 in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 compared
to
an increase of $64,000 in the same period of fiscal 2008. The change relates
primarily to the currency exchange rate fluctuation described above for other
assets.
Accounts
payable decreased $118,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2009 versus
an
increase of $296,000 in the same period in fiscal 2008. Both years were subject
to normal fluctuations in the timing of payments.
Net
cash provided by (used in) investing activities
Cash
provided by investing activities was $1,984,000 in the first three months of
fiscal 2009 compared to cash used in investing activities of $6,355,000 in
the
first three months of fiscal 2008. In the first three months of fiscal 2009,
more cash was provided by dispositions of investment securities than was used
to
purchase investment securities. The cash from dispositions was used to fund
payments on long-term debt, bonus, capital expenditures and dividends. During
fiscal 2008 we also changed our investment strategy to allocate a greater
portion of our financial resources to investments versus cash. Purchases and
dispositions of investment securities in both periods are subject to variations
in the timing of investment maturities. Cash used for capital expenditures
was
$3,552,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2009 compared to $2,147,000
in
the same period of fiscal 2008.
Net
cash used in financing activities
Cash
used
in financing activities was $5,767,000 in the first three months of fiscal
2009
compared to $5,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008. Cash used for
payment of long-term debt in the first quarter of fiscal 2009 was $4,000,000
higher than in the first quarter of fiscal 2008. In addition, $644,000 was
used
to purchase treasury stock in fiscal 2009 while no purchases were made in the
first quarter of fiscal 2008. Dividend payments were also higher at $919,000
in
the first three months of fiscal 2009 due to a dividend increase compared to
$834,000 in the first three months of fiscal 2008. Cash provided from the
issuance of common stock related to stock options exercise activity of $83,000
in the first three months of fiscal 2009 was less than the $593,000 provided
for
the same period in fiscal 2008. The decrease in stock option exercises also
provided a lower excess tax benefit of $61,000 in the first three months of
fiscal 2009 compared to $158,000 in the same period of fiscal 2008.
18
Other
Total
cash and investment balances held by our foreign subsidiaries at October 31,
2008 and 2007 were $1,762,000 and $1,016,000, respectively.
Our
foreign subsidiaries’ cash and investment balances increased due to normal
business operations.
As
part
of our normal course of business, we guarantee certain debts and trade payables
of our wholly owned subsidiaries. These arrangements are made at the request
of
the subsidiaries’ creditors because separate financial statements are not
distributed for the wholly owned subsidiaries. As of October 31, 2008, the
value
of these guarantees was $579,000 of lease liabilities.
On
January 27, 2006, we entered into a $15,000,000 unsecured revolving credit
agreement with Harris N.A. (“Harris”) that is effective until January 27, 2009.
The credit agreement provides that we may select a variable rate based on either
Harris’ prime rate or a LIBOR-based rate, plus a margin which varies depending
on our debt to earnings ratio, or a fixed rate as agreed between us and Harris.
At October 31, 2008, the variable rates would have been 4.0% for the Harris’
prime-based rate or 3.7% for the LIBOR-based rate. The credit agreement contains
restrictive covenants that, among other things and under various conditions
(including a limitation on capital expenditures), limit our ability to incur
additional indebtedness or to dispose of assets. The agreement also requires
us
to maintain a minimum fixed coverage ratio and a minimum consolidated net worth.
As of October 31, 2008 and 2007, we had $15,000,000 available under this credit
facility and we were in compliance with its covenants. While there can be no
assurance regarding the terms, timing or consummation of any successor
agreement, on or before the expiration of this agreement on January 27, 2009,
we
expect to enter into a successor credit arrangement with Harris N.A. containing
terms and conditions reasonably acceptable to us.
We
believe that cash flow from operations, availability under our revolving credit
facility and current cash and investment balances will provide adequate cash
funds for foreseeable working capital needs, capital expenditures at existing
facilities and debt service obligations for at least the next 12 months. We
expect cash requirements for capital expenditures in fiscal 2009 to increase
by
over $5,000,000 from fiscal 2008 due to significant investment in our
manufacturing facilities. Our ability to fund operations, to make planned
capital expenditures, to make scheduled debt payments and to remain in
compliance with all of the financial covenants under debt agreements, including,
but not limited to, the credit agreement, depends on our future operating
performance, which, in turn, is subject to prevailing economic conditions and
to
financial, business and other factors. The timing and size of any new business
ventures or acquisitions that we complete may also impact our cash
requirements.
Our
capital requirements are subject to change as business conditions warrant and
opportunities arise. The tables in the following subsection summarize our
contractual obligations and commercial commitments at October 31, 2008 for
the
time frames indicated.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS AND COMMERCIAL COMMITMENTS
Payments Due by Period
|
||||||||||||||||
Contractual
Obligations
|
Total
|
Less Than 1
Year
|
1 – 3 Years
|
4 – 5 Years
|
After 5 Years
|
|||||||||||
Long-Term
Debt
|
$
|
23,000,000
|
$
|
1,700,000
|
$
|
8,600,000
|
$
|
8,800,000
|
$
|
3,900,000
|
||||||
Interest
on Long-Term Debt
|
5,051,000
|
1,380,000
|
2,190,000
|
1,228,000
|
253,000
|
|||||||||||
Operating
Leases
|
11,995,000
|
2,421,000
|
3,655,000
|
2,042,000
|
3,877,000
|
|||||||||||
Unconditional
Purchase Obligations
|
16,096,000
|
13,399,000
|
2,697,000
|
—
|
—
|
|||||||||||
Total
Contractual Cash Obligations
|
$
|
56,142,000
|
$
|
18,900,000
|
$
|
17,142,000
|
$
|
12,070,000
|
$
|
8,030,000
|
We
are
not required to make a contribution to our defined benefit pension plan in
fiscal 2009. We have not presented this obligation for future years in the
table
above because the funding requirement can vary from year to year based on
changes in the fair value of plan assets and actuarial assumptions.
See Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk below for a
discussion of the potential impact of financial market fluctuations on pension
plan assets and future funding contributions.
As
of
October 31, 2008, our non-current liability for uncertain tax positions was
approximately $200,000. We have not presented this obligation in the table
above
because the timing of future cash flows is dependent on examinations by taxing
authorities and can not reasonably be estimated.
19
The
unconditional purchase obligations represent forward purchase contracts we
have
entered into for a portion of our natural gas fuel needs for fiscal 2009, 2010
and 2011. As of October 31, 2008, the remaining purchase obligation for fiscal
2009 was $12,867,000 for 1,320,000 MMBtu, for fiscal 2010 was $2,154,000 for
240,000 MMBtu and for fiscal 2011 was $1,075,000 for 120,000 MMBtu. These
contracts were entered into in the normal course of business and no contracts
were entered into for speculative purposes.
Amount of Commitment Expiration Per Period
|
||||||||||||||||
Other Commercial
Commitments
|
Total
|
Less Than 1
Year
|
1 – 3 Years
|
4 – 5 Years
|
After 5 Years
|
|||||||||||
Other
Commercial Commitments
|
$
|
42,953,000
|
$
|
29,007,000
|
$
|
13,946,000
|
$
|
—
|
$
|
—
|
The
other
commercial commitments represent open purchase orders, including blanket
purchase orders, for items such as packaging, additives and pallets used in
the
normal course of operations. The expected timing of payments of these
obligations is estimated based on current information. Timing of payments and
actual amounts paid may be different depending on the time of receipt of goods
or services, or changes to agreed-upon amounts for some
obligations.
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND ESTIMATES
This
discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is
based on our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements, which have
been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in
the
United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use
of
estimates and assumptions related to the reporting of assets, liabilities,
revenues, expenses and related disclosures. In preparing these financial
statements, we have made our best estimates and judgments of certain amounts
included in the financial statements. Estimates are revised periodically. Actual
results could differ from these estimates.
See
the
information concerning our critical accounting policies included under
Management’s Discussion of Financial Condition and Results of Operations in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 filed with
the Securities and Exchange Commission, which is incorporated by reference
in
this Form 10-Q. For additional information on our adoption of SFAS 157, see
Note
5 of the notes to unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in
this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. For additional information on our adoption of
SFAS 159 and EITF 06-11, see Note 3 of the notes to unaudited condensed
consolidated financial statements in this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q.
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
In
March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures
about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities—an amendment of SFAS No. 133
(“SFAS
161”).
This
Statement requires disclosures of how and why an entity uses derivative
instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted
for and how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s
financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS 161 is effective
for fiscal years and interim periods beginning after November 15, 2008, with
early application encouraged. We will adopt this Statement as of February 1,
2009, the beginning of our third quarter of our fiscal year ending July 31,
2009. We are currently evaluating the impact this Statement will have on our
consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Noncontrolling
Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements—An Amendment of ARB No. 51
(“SFAS
160”).
This
statement establishes new accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. SFAS 160 requires the noncontrolling interest to be reported as
a
component of equity, changes in a parent’s ownership interest while the parent
retains its controlling interest be accounted for as equity transactions, and
any retained noncontrolling equity investment upon the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary be initially measured at fair value. SFAS 160 is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We will adopt this Statement
as of August 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact this Statement
will
have on our consolidated financial statements.
In
June
2008, the FASB issued FSP EITF 03-6-1, Determining
Whether Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are
Participating Securities (“FSP
EITF 03-6-1). This FSP states that unvested share-based payment awards that
contain nonforfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents (whether
paid
or unpaid) are participating securities and shall be included in the computation
of earnings per share pursuant to the two-class method. The FSP is effective
for
financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008,
and interim periods within those years. Upon adoption, a company is required
to
retrospectively adjust its earnings per share data (including any amounts
related to interim periods, summaries of earnings and selected financial data)
to conform to the provisions in this FSP. Earlier adoption is prohibited. We
will adopt this FSP as of August 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact
FSP EITF 03-6-1 will have on our consolidated financial statements.
20
ITEM
3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET
RISK
We
are
exposed to interest rate risk and employ policies and procedures to manage
our
exposure to changes in the market risk of our cash equivalents and short-term
investments. We had two interest rate swap agreements as of October 31, 2008.
We
believe that the market risk arising from holding our financial instruments
is
not material.
We
are
exposed to foreign currency fluctuation risk, primarily U.S. Dollar/British
Pound, U.S. Dollar/Euro and U.S. Dollar/Canadian Dollar, as it relates to
certain accounts receivables and our foreign operations. Foreign currency
denominated accounts receivable is a small fraction of our consolidated accounts
receivable. We are also subject to translation exposure of our foreign
subsidiaries’ financial statements. In recent years, our foreign subsidiaries
have not generated a substantial portion of our consolidated sales or net
income. We do not enter into any hedge contracts in an attempt to offset any
adverse effect of changes in currency exchange rates. We believe that the
foreign currency fluctuation risk is limited due to our minimal foreign
operations and assets held in such countries.
We
are
exposed to market risk at it relates to the investments that make up our plan
assets under our defined benefit pension plan. The fair value of these assets
is
subject to change due to fluctuations in the financial markets. Changes in
the
value of plan assets are not expected to have an impact on the income statement
for fiscal 2009; however, reduced benefit plan assets could result in increased
benefit costs in future years and may increase the amount and accelerate the
timing of future funding contributions.
We
are
exposed to regulatory risk in the fluid purification, animal health and
agricultural markets, principally as a result of the risk of increasing
regulation of the food chain in the United States and Europe. We actively
monitor developments in this area, both directly and through trade organizations
of which we are a member.
We
are
exposed to commodity price risk with respect to fuel. We have contracted for
a
portion of our anticipated fuel needs for fiscal 2009, 2010 and 2011 using
forward purchase contracts to mitigate the volatility of our kiln fuel prices.
We increased our forward gas contract purchases as gas prices declined. All
contracts are related to the normal course of business and no contracts are
entered into for speculative purposes. As of October 31, 2008, we have purchased
natural gas contracts representing approximately 70% of our planned kiln fuel
needs for fiscal 2009. We estimate the weighted average cost of these natural
gas contracts in fiscal 2009 to be approximately 17% higher than the contracts
in fiscal 2008.
The
tables below provide information about our natural gas purchase contracts,
which
are sensitive to changes in commodity prices, specifically natural gas prices.
For the purchase contracts outstanding at October 31, 2008, the table presents
the notional amounts in MMBtu’s, the weighted average contract prices, and the
total dollar contract amount, which will mature by July 31 of 2009, 2010 and
2011. The Fair Value was determined using the “Most Recent Settle” price for the
“Henry Hub Natural Gas” option contract prices as listed by the New York
Mercantile Exchange on December 1, 2008.
Commodity Price Sensitivity
Natural Gas Future Contracts
For the Year Ending July 31, 2009
|
|||||||
Expected 2009
Maturity
|
Fair Value
|
||||||
Natural
Gas Future Volumes (MMBtu)
|
1,320,000
|
—
|
|||||
Weighted
Average Price (Per MMBtu)
|
$
|
9.75
|
—
|
||||
Contract
Amount ($ U.S., in thousands)
|
$
|
12,866.6
|
$
|
8,793.9
|
21
Commodity Price Sensitivity
Natural Gas Future Contracts
For the Year Ending July 31, 2010
|
|||||||
Expected 2010
Maturity
|
Fair Value
|
||||||
Natural
Gas Future Volumes (MMBtu)
|
240,000
|
—
|
|||||
Weighted
Average Price (Per MMBtu)
|
$
|
8.98
|
—
|
||||
Contract
Amount ($ U.S., in thousands)
|
$
|
2,154.2
|
$
|
1,807.8
|
Commodity Price Sensitivity
Natural Gas Future Contracts
For the Year Ending July 31, 2011
|
|||||||
Expected 2010
Maturity
|
Fair Value
|
||||||
Natural
Gas Future Volumes (MMBtu)
|
120,000
|
—
|
|||||
Weighted
Average Price (Per MMBtu)
|
$
|
8.96
|
—
|
||||
Contract
Amount ($ U.S., in thousands)
|
$
|
1,075.2
|
$
|
950.4
|
Factors
that could influence the fair value of the natural gas contracts, include,
but
are not limited to, the creditworthiness of our natural gas suppliers, the
overall general economy, developments in world events, and the general demand
for natural gas by the manufacturing sector, seasonality and the weather
patterns throughout the United States and the world. Some of these same events
have allowed us to mitigate the impact of the natural gas contracts by the
continued, and in some cases expanded, use of recycled oil in our manufacturing
processes. Accurate estimates of the impact that these contracts may have on
our
financial results are difficult to make due to the inherent uncertainty of
future fluctuations in option contract prices in the natural gas options
market.
22
ITEM
4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Management
conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. The controls evaluation was conducted under
the
supervision and with the participation of management, including our Chief
Executive Officer (“CEO”) and Chief Financial Officer (“CFO”). Based upon the
controls evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of the end of
the
period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were
effective to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be
disclosed in our Exchange Act reports is recorded, processed, summarized and
reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and that material
information relating to us and our consolidated subsidiaries is made known
to
management, including the CEO and CFO, during the period when our periodic
reports are being prepared.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the fiscal quarter ended October 31, 2008 that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
Inherent
Limitations on Effectiveness of Controls
Our
management, including the CEO and CFO, do not expect that our disclosure
controls and procedures or our internal control over financial reporting will
prevent or detect all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how
well
designed and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that
the control system’s objectives will be met. The design of a control system must
reflect the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of
controls must be considered relative to their costs. Further, because of the
inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can
provide absolute assurance that misstatements due to error or fraud will not
occur or that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the
Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include the realities
that judgments in decision-making can be faulty and that breakdowns can occur
because of simple error or mistake. Controls can also be circumvented by the
individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by
management override of the controls. The design of any system of controls is
based in part on certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events,
and
there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated
goals under all potential future conditions. Projections of any evaluation
of
controls effectiveness to future periods are subject to risks. Over time,
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions or deterioration
in the degree of compliance with policies or procedures.
23
PART
II – OTHER INFORMATION
Items
1,
3, 4 and 5 of this Part II are either inapplicable or are answered in the
negative and are omitted pursuant to the instructions to Part II.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS
For
information regarding Risk Factors, please refer to Item 1A in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the year ended July 31, 2008. There have been no material
changes in risk factors since July 31, 2008.
ITEM
2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
During
the three months ended October 31, 2008, we did not sell any securities which
were not registered under the Securities Act. The following chart summarizes
Common Stock repurchases during this period.
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES1
For the Three
Months Ended
October 31, 2008
|
(a) Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased
|
(b)
Average
Price Paid
per Share
|
(c) Total Number
of Shares
Purchased as Part
of Publicly
Announced Plans
or Programs
|
(d) Maximum
Number of Shares
that may yet be
Purchased Under
Plans or Programs2
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|||||||||
August
1, 2008 to
|
|||||||||||||
August
31, 2008
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
313,822
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
September
1, 2008 to
|
|||||||||||||
September
30, 2008
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
313,822
|
|||||||||
|
|||||||||||||
October
1, 2008 to
|
|||||||||||||
October
31, 2008
|
40,834
|
$
|
15.78
|
40,834
|
272,988
|
1
The
table
summarizes repurchases of (and remaining authority to repurchase) shares of
our
Common Stock. We did not repurchase any shares of our Class B Stock during
the
period in question, and no shares of our Class A Common Stock are currently
outstanding. Descriptions of our Common Stock, Class B Stock and Class A Common
Stock are contained in Note 6 of the consolidated financial statements included
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended July 31, 2008 filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
2 On
October 10, 2005, our Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to
500,000 shares of Common Stock, with repurchases to be made from time to time
in
the discretion of our management and in accordance with applicable laws, rules
and regulations. This authorization does not have a stated expiration
date. The share numbers in this column indicate the number of shares of
Common Stock that may yet be repurchased under this authorization. The share
numbers were not affected by the five-for-four stock split that occurred on
September 8, 2006. We do not have any current authorization from our Board
of
Directors to repurchase shares of Class B Stock, and no shares of Class A Common
Stock are currently outstanding.
24
ITEM
6. EXHIBITS
(a)
|
EXHIBITS:
|
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
SEC Document Reference
|
||
11
|
Statement
re: Computation of Earnings per Share.
|
Filed
herewith.
|
||
31
|
Certifications
pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a).
|
Filed
herewith.
|
||
32
|
Certifications
pursuant to Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Furnished
herewith.
|
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
OIL-DRI
CORPORATION OF AMERICA
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
BY
|
/s/
Andrew N. Peterson
|
|
Andrew
N. Peterson
|
||
Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
BY
|
/s/
Daniel S. Jaffee
|
|
Daniel
S. Jaffee
|
||
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
Dated:
December 9, 2008.
26
EXHIBITS
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
|
11
|
Statement
re: Computation of Earnings per Share.
|
|
31
|
Certifications
pursuant to Rule 13a – 14(a).
|
|
32
|
Certifications
pursuant to Section 1350 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
Note:
|
Stockholders
may receive copies of the above listed exhibits, without fee, by
written
request to Investor Relations, Oil-Dri Corporation of America, 410
North
Michigan Avenue, Suite 400, Chicago, Illinois 60611-4213.
|
27