OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC - Quarter Report: 2009 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) |
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2009
OR
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number: 1-16337
OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 76-0476605 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
incorporation or organization) | Identification No.) | |
Three Allen Center, 333 Clay
Street, Suite 4620, Houston, Texas |
77002 (Zip Code) |
|
(Address of principal executive offices) |
(713) 652-0582
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
None
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
None
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
YES þ
NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files)
YES o
NO o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filer o | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act).
YES o
NO þ
The Registrant had 49,770,334 shares of common stock outstanding and 3,232,118 shares of treasury stock as of October 30, 2009.
OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC.
INDEX
Page No. | ||||||||
Part I FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
||||||||
Item 1. Financial Statements: |
||||||||
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements |
||||||||
3 | ||||||||
4 | ||||||||
5 | ||||||||
6 - 15 | ||||||||
16 - 27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
27 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
28 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
29 | ||||||||
30 | ||||||||
EX-31.1 | ||||||||
EX-31.2 | ||||||||
EX-32.1 | ||||||||
EX-32.2 |
2
Table of Contents
OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
THREE MONTHS ENDED | NINE MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||
SEPTEMBER 30, | SEPTEMBER 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
AS ADJUSTED | AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||
(NOTE 11) | (NOTE 11) | |||||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 456,103 | $ | 814,790 | $ | 1,579,536 | $ | 2,047,401 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of sales and services |
353,845 | 609,354 | 1,235,747 | 1,532,874 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative expenses |
33,964 | 37,494 | 102,377 | 105,577 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation and amortization expense |
30,193 | 27,325 | 86,863 | 75,741 | ||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| | 94,528 | | ||||||||||||
Other operating income |
(439 | ) | (893 | ) | (181 | ) | (659 | ) | ||||||||
417,563 | 673,280 | 1,519,334 | 1,713,533 | |||||||||||||
Operating income |
38,540 | 141,510 | 60,202 | 333,868 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(3,613 | ) | (5,656 | ) | (11,714 | ) | (18,416 | ) | ||||||||
Interest income |
27 | 940 | 350 | 2,756 | ||||||||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated affiliates |
250 | 431 | 1,184 | 3,167 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sale of investment |
| 3,452 | | 6,160 | ||||||||||||
Other income/(expense) |
91 | (458 | ) | 193 | (264 | ) | ||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
35,295 | 140,219 | 50,215 | 327,271 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense |
(8,594 | ) | (52,040 | ) | (30,637 | ) | (114,125 | ) | ||||||||
Net income |
26,701 | 88,179 | 19,578 | 213,146 | ||||||||||||
Less: Net income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
122 | 98 | 357 | 327 | ||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Oil States International, Inc. |
$ | 26,579 | $ | 88,081 | $ | 19,221 | $ | 212,819 | ||||||||
Net income per share attributable to Oil States
International, Inc. common stockholders |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 0.54 | $ | 1.77 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 4.29 | ||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 0.53 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 4.10 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
49,653 | 49,811 | 49,584 | 49,622 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
50,153 | 52,322 | 49,886 | 51,949 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these financial statements.
these financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
SEPTEMBER 30, | DECEMBER 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
AS ADJUSTED | ||||||||
(NOTE 11) | ||||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 61,281 | $ | 30,199 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
361,549 | 575,982 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
485,304 | 612,488 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets |
13,730 | 18,815 | ||||||
Total current assets |
921,864 | 1,237,484 | ||||||
Property, plant, and equipment, net |
726,877 | 695,338 | ||||||
Goodwill, net |
217,627 | 305,441 | ||||||
Investments in unconsolidated affiliates |
4,893 | 5,899 | ||||||
Other non-current assets |
35,335 | 54,356 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 1,906,596 | $ | 2,298,518 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities |
$ | 190,385 | $ | 371,789 | ||||
Income taxes |
10,555 | 52,546 | ||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
446 | 4,943 | ||||||
Deferred revenue |
117,872 | 105,640 | ||||||
Other current liabilities |
850 | 1,587 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
320,108 | 536,505 | ||||||
Long-term debt |
192,657 | 449,058 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
55,691 | 64,780 | ||||||
Other noncurrent liabilities |
12,445 | 12,634 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
580,901 | 1,062,977 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Oil States International, Inc. stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock |
530 | 526 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
463,920 | 453,733 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
920,222 | 901,001 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income/(loss) |
32,403 | (28,409 | ) | |||||
Treasury stock |
(92,341 | ) | (91,831 | ) | ||||
Total Oil States International, Inc. stockholders equity |
1,324,734 | 1,235,020 | ||||||
Noncontrolling interest |
961 | 521 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
1,325,695 | 1,235,541 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 1,906,596 | $ | 2,298,518 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of
these financial statements.
these financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
NINE MONTHS | ||||||||
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
AS ADJUSTED | ||||||||
(NOTE 11) | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net Income |
$ | 19,578 | $ | 213,146 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
86,863 | 75,741 | ||||||
Deferred income tax provision (benefit) |
(12,774 | ) | 10,910 | |||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
| (3,367 | ) | |||||
Loss on impairment of goodwill |
94,528 | | ||||||
Equity in earnings of unconsolidated subsidiaries, net of dividends |
(1,184 | ) | (2,914 | ) | ||||
Non-cash compensation charge |
8,614 | 7,968 | ||||||
Accretion of debt discount |
5,016 | 4,670 | ||||||
Gains on sale of investment and disposals of assets |
(439 | ) | (6,602 | ) | ||||
Other, net |
2,526 | 1,946 | ||||||
Changes in working capital |
149,547 | 4,476 | ||||||
Net cash flows provided by operating activities |
352,275 | 305,974 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Acquisitions of businesses, net of cash acquired |
18 | (29,835 | ) | |||||
Capital expenditures |
(78,164 | ) | (206,731 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from note receivable |
21,166 | | ||||||
Proceeds from sale of investment |
| 27,381 | ||||||
Other, net |
(1,778 | ) | 3,103 | |||||
Net cash flows used in investing activities |
(58,758 | ) | (206,082 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Revolving credit repayments |
(264,528 | ) | (73,188 | ) | ||||
Debt repayments |
(4,839 | ) | (4,816 | ) | ||||
Issuance of common stock |
2,237 | 8,628 | ||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| (4,026 | ) | |||||
Excess tax benefits from share-based payment arrangements |
| 3,367 | ||||||
Other, net |
(505 | ) | (1,120 | ) | ||||
Net cash flows used in financing activities |
(267,635 | ) | (71,155 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
5,333 | (3,664 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents from continuing operations |
31,215 | 25,073 | ||||||
Net cash used in discontinued operations operating activities |
(133 | ) | (44 | ) | ||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
30,199 | 30,592 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 61,281 | $ | 55,621 | ||||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Building capital lease |
$ | | $ | 8,304 | ||||
Non-cash financing activities: |
||||||||
Reclassification of 2 3/8% contingent convertible
senior notes to current liabilities |
| 147,497 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these
financial statements.
financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Oil States International, Inc.
and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (referred to in this report as we or the Company) have been
prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission pertaining
to interim financial information. Certain information in footnote disclosures normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles
(GAAP) have been condensed or omitted pursuant to these rules and regulations. The unaudited
financial statements included in this report reflect all the adjustments, consisting of normal
recurring adjustments, which the Company considers necessary for a fair presentation of the results
of operations for the interim periods covered and for the financial condition of the Company at the
date of the interim balance sheet. Results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative
of results for the full year.
Preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosed
amounts of contingent assets and liabilities and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses. If
the underlying estimates and assumptions, upon which the financial statements are based, change in
future periods, actual amounts may differ from those included in the accompanying condensed
consolidated financial statements.
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (the FASB), which are adopted by the Company as of the specified effective date.
Unless otherwise discussed, management believes the impact of recently issued standards, which are
not yet effective, will not have a material impact on the Companys consolidated financial
statements upon adoption.
The financial statements included in this report should be read in conjunction with the
Companys audited financial statements and accompanying notes included in its Annual Report on Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008. Further, in connection with preparation of the
consolidated financial statements and in accordance with current accounting standards, the Company
evaluated subsequent events after the balance sheet date of September 30, 2009 through the time of
filing on November 4, 2009. There were no material subsequent events requiring additional
disclosure in or amendment to the quarterly financial statements as of November 4, 2009.
2. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
From time to time, new accounting pronouncements are issued by the FASB that are adopted by
the Company as of the specified effective date. Unless otherwise discussed, management believes
that the impact of recently issued standards, which are not yet effective, will not have a material
impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
In September 2006, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on fair value measurements, which
defines fair value, establishes guidelines for measuring fair value and expands disclosures
regarding fair value measurements. This accounting standard does not require any new fair value
measurements but rather eliminates inconsistencies in guidance found in various prior accounting
pronouncements. It is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. In February
2008, the FASB issued an accounting standards update deferring the effective date of the fair value
accounting standard for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities, except for items that are
recognized or disclosed at fair value in an entitys financial statements on a recurring basis (at
least annually), to fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and interim periods within
those fiscal years. Earlier adoption was permitted, provided the company had not yet issued
financial statements, including for interim periods, for that fiscal year. We adopted those
provisions of this accounting standard that were unaffected by the delay in the first quarter of
2008. In the first quarter of 2009, we adopted the remaining provisions of this accounting
standard. Certain assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis; that is, they are
subject to fair value adjustments in certain circumstances (for example, when there is evidence of
impairment). Such adoption did not have a material effect on our consolidated statements of
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
6
Table of Contents
In September 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standards update effective for this and
future reporting periods on measuring the fair value of liabilities. Implementation is not expected
to have a material impact on the Companys financial condition, results of operation or disclosures
contained in our notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements.
In December 2007, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on business combinations. The new
accounting standard establishes principles and requirements for how an acquirer recognizes and
measures in its financial statements the identifiable assets acquired, the liabilities assumed, any
non-controlling interest in the acquiree and the goodwill acquired. The accounting standard also
establishes disclosure requirements that will enable users to evaluate the nature and financial
effects of the business combination. The accounting standard applies prospectively to business
combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual
reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. The accounting standard was effective beginning January 1, 2009; accordingly, any business
combinations we engage in after this date will be recorded and disclosed in accordance with this
accounting standard. No business combination transactions occurred during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009.
In December 2007, the FASB also issued a new accounting standard on noncontrolling interests
in consolidated financial statements. This accounting standard requires that accounting and
reporting for minority interests be recharacterized as noncontrolling interests and classified as a
component of equity. It also establishes reporting requirements that provide sufficient
disclosures that clearly identify and distinguish between the interests of the parent and the
interests of the noncontrolling owners. This accounting standard applies to all entities that
prepare consolidated financial statements, except not-for-profit organizations, but will affect
only those entities that have an outstanding noncontrolling interest in one or more subsidiaries or
that deconsolidate a subsidiary. The new accounting standard is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2008. This accounting
standard applies prospectively, except for presentation and disclosure requirements, which are
applied retrospectively. Effective January 1, 2009, we have presented our noncontrolling interests
in accordance with this standard.
In May 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the accounting for convertible debt
instruments that can be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement), which
changed the accounting for our Contingent Convertible Senior Subordinated 2 3/8% Notes (2 3/8%
Notes). Under the new rules, for convertible debt instruments that can be settled entirely or
partially in cash upon conversion, an entity is required to separately account for the liability
and equity components of the instrument in a manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt
borrowing rate. The difference between bond cash proceeds and the estimated fair value is recorded
as a debt discount and accreted to interest expense over the expected life of the bond. Although
this accounting standard has no impact on the Companys actual past or future cash flows, it
requires the Company to record a material increase in non-cash interest expense as the debt
discount is amortized. The accounting standard became effective for the Company beginning January
1, 2009 and is applied retrospectively to all periods presented. See Note 11 to the Unaudited
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
In May 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on subsequent events, which establishes
general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet
date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. Under the new
accounting standard, as under current practice, an entity must record the effects of subsequent
events that provide evidence about conditions that existed at the balance sheet date and must
disclose but not record the effects of subsequent events which provide evidence about conditions
that did not exist at the balance sheet date. This accounting standard is effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, ending after June 15, 2009. The adoption of
this accounting standard did not have a material impact on the Companys financial condition,
results of operation or disclosures contained in our notes to the condensed consolidated financial
statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued a new accounting standard, The FASB Accounting Standards
Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles. This new accounting
standard established the FASB Accounting Standards Codification, or FASB ASC, as the source of
authoritative GAAP recognized by the FASB for non-governmental entities. All existing accounting
standards have been superseded and accounting literature not included in the FASB ASC is considered
non-authoritative. Subsequent issuances of new standards will be in the
7
Table of Contents
form of Accounting Standards Updates, or ASU, that will be included in the ASC. Generally,
the FASB ASC is not expected to change GAAP. Pursuant to the adoption of this new accounting
standard, we have adjusted references to authoritative accounting literature in our financial
statements. Adoption of this standard had no effect on our financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
In October 2009, the FASB issued an accounting standards update that modified the accounting
and disclosures for revenue recognition in a multiple-element arrangement. These amendments,
effective for fiscal years beginning on or after June 15, 2010 (early adoption is permitted),
modify the criteria for recognizing revenue in multiple- element arrangements and the scope of what
constitutes a non-software deliverable. The Company is currently assessing the impact of these
amendments on its financial condition and results of operations.
3. DETAILS OF SELECTED BALANCE SHEET ACCOUNTS
Additional information regarding selected balance sheet accounts is presented below (in
thousands):
SEPTEMBER 30, | DECEMBER 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Accounts receivable, net: |
||||||||
Trade |
$ | 261,906 | $ | 456,975 | ||||
Unbilled revenue |
102,951 | 119,907 | ||||||
Other |
1,895 | 3,268 | ||||||
Total accounts receivable |
366,752 | 580,150 | ||||||
Allowance for doubtful accounts |
(5,203 | ) | (4,168 | ) | ||||
$ | 361,549 | $ | 575,982 | |||||
SEPTEMBER 30, | DECEMBER 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Inventories, net: |
||||||||
Tubular goods |
$ | 289,447 | $ | 396,462 | ||||
Other finished goods and purchased products |
73,588 | 88,848 | ||||||
Work in process |
63,153 | 65,009 | ||||||
Raw materials |
67,923 | 68,881 | ||||||
Total inventories |
494,111 | 619,200 | ||||||
Inventory reserves |
(8,807 | ) | (6,712 | ) | ||||
$ | 485,304 | $ | 612,488 | |||||
ESTIMATED | SEPTEMBER 30, | DECEMBER 31, | ||||||||||
USEFUL LIFE | 2009 | 2008 | ||||||||||
Property, plant and equipment, net: |
||||||||||||
Land |
$ | 19,240 | $ | 18,298 | ||||||||
Buildings and leasehold improvements |
3-50 years | 160,615 | 135,080 | |||||||||
Machinery and equipment |
2-29 years | 286,895 | 270,434 | |||||||||
Accommodations assets |
10-15 years | 369,046 | 300,765 | |||||||||
Rental tools |
4-10 years | 152,307 | 141,644 | |||||||||
Office furniture and equipment |
1-10 years | 29,523 | 26,506 | |||||||||
Vehicles |
2-10 years | 71,774 | 68,645 | |||||||||
Construction in progress |
50,518 | 49,915 | ||||||||||
Total property, plant and equipment |
1,139,918 | 1,011,287 | ||||||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation |
(413,041 | ) | (315,949 | ) | ||||||||
$ | 726,877 | $ | 695,338 | |||||||||
SEPTEMBER 30, | DECEMBER 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Accounts payable and accrued liabilities: |
||||||||
Trade accounts payable |
$ | 124,190 | $ | 307,132 | ||||
Accrued compensation |
34,680 | 35,864 | ||||||
Accrued insurance |
8,559 | 7,551 | ||||||
Accrued taxes, other than income taxes |
9,274 | 7,257 | ||||||
Reserves related to discontinued operations |
2,412 | 2,544 | ||||||
Other |
11,270 | 11,441 | ||||||
$ | 190,385 | $ | 371,789 | |||||
8
Table of Contents
4. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The calculation of earnings per share attributable to Oil States International, Inc. is
presented below (in thousands, except per share amounts):
THREE MONTHS ENDED | NINE MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||
SEPTEMBER 30 | SEPTEMBER 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
AS ADJUSTED | AS ADJUSTED | |||||||||||||||
(NOTE 11) | (NOTE 11) | |||||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Oil States International, Inc. |
$ | 26,579 | $ | 88,081 | $ | 19,221 | $ | 212,819 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
49,653 | 49,811 | 49,584 | 49,622 | ||||||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.54 | $ | 1.77 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 4.29 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to Oil States International, Inc. |
$ | 26,579 | $ | 88,081 | $ | 19,221 | $ | 212,819 | ||||||||
Weighted average number of shares outstanding |
49,653 | 49,811 | 49,584 | 49,622 | ||||||||||||
Effect of dilutive securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Options on common stock |
338 | 490 | 213 | 509 | ||||||||||||
2 3/8% Convertible Senior Subordinated Notes |
51 | 1,900 | 17 | 1,694 | ||||||||||||
Restricted stock awards and other |
111 | 121 | 72 | 124 | ||||||||||||
Total shares and dilutive securities |
50,153 | 52,322 | 49,886 | 51,949 | ||||||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.53 | $ | 1.68 | $ | 0.39 | $ | 4.10 |
Our calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 excludes 1,190,149 shares and 1,826,143 shares, respectively, issuable pursuant
to outstanding stock options and restricted stock awards, due to their antidilutive effect. Our
calculation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
excludes anti-dilutive shares of 266,063 and 378,605, respectively.
5. BUSINESS ACQUISITIONS AND GOODWILL
On February 1, 2008, we purchased all of the equity of Christina Lake Enterprises Ltd., an
accommodations lodge (Christina Lake Lodge) in the Conklin area of Alberta, Canada. Christina Lake
Lodge provides lodging and catering in the southern area of the oil sands region. Consideration
for the lodge consisted of $6.9 million in cash, net of cash acquired, including transaction costs,
funded from borrowings under the Companys existing credit facility, and the assumption of certain
liabilities. The Christina Lake Lodge has been included in the accommodations business within the
well site services segment since the date of acquisition.
On February 15, 2008, we acquired a waterfront facility on the Houston ship channel for use in
our offshore products segment. This waterfront facility expanded our ability to manufacture,
assemble, test and load out larger subsea production and drilling rig equipment thereby expanding
our capabilities. Consideration paid for the facility was approximately $22.9 million in cash,
including transaction costs, funded from borrowings under the Companys existing credit facility.
In June 2009, we acquired the 51% majority interest in a venture we had previously accounted
for under the equity method. The business acquired supplies accommodations and other services to
mining operations in Canada. Consideration paid for the business was $2.3 million in cash and
estimated contingent consideration of $0.3 million.
9
Table of Contents
Changes in the carrying amount of goodwill for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009
are as follows (in thousands):
Balance as of | Acquisitions | Foreign currency | Balance as of | |||||||||||||||||
January 1, | and | translation and | Goodwill | September 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2009 | adjustments | other changes | impairment | 2009 | ||||||||||||||||
Offshore Products |
$ | 85,074 | $ | | $ | 464 | $ | | $ | 85,538 | ||||||||||
Well Site Services |
220,367 | 337 | 5,913 | (94,528 | ) | 132,089 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 305,441 | $ | 337 | $ | 6,377 | $ | (94,528 | ) | $ | 217,627 | |||||||||
Based on a combination of factors (including the current global economic environment, the
Companys outlook for U.S. drilling activity and pricing and the current market capitalization for
the Company and comparable oilfield service companies), and consistent with methodologies utilized
by the Company in the past as described in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2008, the Company concluded that the goodwill amounts previously recorded in its
rental tools reporting unit were partially impaired as of June 30, 2009. The total goodwill
impairment charge recognized was $94.5 million before taxes and $82.7 million after-tax. This
non-cash charge did not impact the Companys liquidity position, its debt covenants or cash flows.
The fair value measurements used for our goodwill impairment testing use significant unobservable
Level 3 inputs which reflect our own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants
would use in measuring fair value including assumptions about risk.
6. DEBT
As of September 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, long-term debt consisted of the following (in
thousands):
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | As Adjusted | |||||||
(Note 11) | ||||||||
U.S. revolving credit facility which matures on December 5, 2011, with available
commitments up to $325 million and with an average interest rate of 1.4% for the
nine month period ended September 30, 2009 |
$ | 28,000 | $ | 226,000 | ||||
Canadian revolving credit facility which matures on December 5, 2011, with
available commitments up to $175 million and with an average interest rate of
1.9% for the nine month period ended September 30, 2009 |
| 61,244 | ||||||
2 3/8% contingent convertible senior subordinated notes, net due 2025 |
154,126 | 149,110 | ||||||
Subordinated unsecured notes payable to sellers of businesses, interest rate of
6%, matured in 2009 |
| 4,500 | ||||||
Capital lease obligations and other debt |
10,977 | 13,147 | ||||||
Total debt |
193,103 | 454,001 | ||||||
Less: current maturities |
(446 | ) | (4,943 | ) | ||||
Total long-term debt |
$ | 192,657 | $ | 449,058 | ||||
As of September 30, 2009, we have classified the $175.0 million principal amount of our 2
3/8% Notes, net of unamortized discount, as a noncurrent liability because certain contingent
conversion thresholds based on the Companys stock price were not met at that date and, as a
result, note holders could not present their notes for conversion during the quarter following the
September 30, 2009 measurement date. The future convertibility and resultant balance sheet
classification of this liability will be monitored at each quarterly reporting date and will be
analyzed dependent upon market prices of the Companys common stock during the prescribed
measurement periods.
In May 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the accounting for convertible debt
instruments that can be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement), which
changed the accounting for our 2 3/8% Notes. Under the new rules, for convertible debt instruments
that can be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion, an entity is required to
separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that
reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This accounting standard became
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009, and is applied retrospectively to all periods
presented. See Note 11 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
As of September 30, 2009, the Company had approximately $61.3 million of cash and cash
equivalents and $450.3 million of the Companys $500 million
U.S. and Canadian revolving credit facility was available for future financing needs.
10
Table of Contents
The Companys financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, investments,
receivables, notes receivable, payables, and debt instruments. The Company believes that the
carrying values of these instruments,
other than our fixed rate contingent convertible senior notes, on the accompanying
consolidated balance sheets approximate their fair values.
The fair value of our 2 3/8% contingent convertible senior notes is estimated based on prices
quoted from third-party financial institutions. The carrying and fair values of these notes are as
follows (in thousands):
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest | Carrying | Fair | Carrying | Fair | ||||||||||||||||
Rate | Value | Value | Value | Value | ||||||||||||||||
Principal amount due 2025 |
2 3/8 | % | $ | 175,000 | $ | 222,766 | $ | 175,000 | $ | 133,613 | ||||||||||
Less: Unamortized discount |
(20,874 | ) | | (25,890 | ) | | ||||||||||||||
Net value |
$ | 154,126 | $ | 222,766 | $ | 149,110 | $ | 133,613 | ||||||||||||
As of September 30, 2009, the estimated fair value of the Companys debt outstanding
under its revolving credit facility is estimated to be lower than carrying value since the terms of
this facility are more favorable than those that might be expected to be available in the current
credit and lending environment. We are unable to estimate the fair value of the Companys bank
debt due to the potential variability of expected outstanding balances under the facility.
7. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME AND CHANGES IN COMMON STOCK OUTSTANDING:
Comprehensive income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008 was as
follows (dollars in thousands):
THREE MONTHS | NINE MONTHS | |||||||||||||||
ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, | ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
As Adjusted | As Adjusted | |||||||||||||||
(Note 11) | (Note 11) | |||||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 26,701 | $ | 88,179 | $ | 19,578 | $ | 213,146 | ||||||||
Other comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||
Cumulative translation adjustment |
28,957 | (26,722 | ) | 60,812 | (35,182 | ) | ||||||||||
Unrealized gain on marketable securities, net of tax |
| 365 | | 2,170 | ||||||||||||
Reclassification adjustment, net of tax |
| (2,170 | ) | | (2,170 | ) | ||||||||||
Total other comprehensive income |
28,957 | (28,527 | ) | 60,812 | (35,182 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive income |
55,658 | 59,652 | 80,390 | 177,964 | ||||||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to noncontrolling interest |
(122 | ) | (98 | ) | (357 | ) | (327 | ) | ||||||||
Comprehensive income attributable to Oil States International, Inc. |
$ | 55,536 | $ | 59,554 | $ | 80,033 | $ | 177,637 | ||||||||
Shares of common stock outstanding January 1, 2009 |
49,500,708 | |||
Shares issued upon exercise of stock options and vesting of stock awards |
273,734 | |||
Shares withheld for taxes on vesting of restricted stock awards and transferred to treasury |
(25,473 | ) | ||
Shares of common stock outstanding September 30, 2009 |
49,748,969 | |||
8. STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
During the first nine months of 2009, we granted restricted
stock awards totaling 191,772 shares valued at $3.6 million. A total of 121,500 of these awards
vest in four equal annual installments, 25,500 awards vest in their entirety only after three years
of service, 43,328 awards made to directors vest after one year and the remaining 1,444 awards
vested immediately as part of compensation paid to the chairman of the Companys board of
directors. A total of 768,650 stock options were awarded in the nine months ended September 30,
2009 with an average exercise price of $17.20 and a six-year term. A total of 714,450 of these
options vest in annual 25% increments over the next four years and the remaining 54,200 options
vest in their entirety only after three years of service.
Stock based compensation pre-tax expense recognized in the nine month period ended September
30, 2009 totaled $8.6 million, or $0.12 per diluted share after tax (excluding the impact on the
Companys effective tax rate of the goodwill impairment recognized during the period.) Stock based
compensation pre-tax expense recognized in
11
Table of Contents
the nine month period ended September 30, 2008 totaled $8.0 million, or $0.10 per diluted
share after tax. Stock based compensation pre-tax expense recognized in the three month period
ended September 30, 2009 totaled $2.8 million, or $0.04 per diluted share after tax (excluding the
impact on the Companys effective tax rate of the goodwill impairment.) Stock based compensation
pre-tax expense recognized in the three month period ended September 30, 2008 totaled $2.8 million,
or $0.03 per diluted share after tax. The total fair value of restricted stock awards that vested
during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 was $2.7 million. At September 30, 2009, $18.6
million of compensation cost related to unvested stock options and restricted stock awards
attributable to future performance had not yet been recognized.
9. INCOME TAXES
Income tax expense for interim periods is based on estimates of the effective tax rate for the
entire fiscal year. The Companys income tax provision for the three months ended September 30,
2009 totaled $8.6 million, or 24.3% of pretax income, compared to $52.0 million, or 37.1% of pretax
income, for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in the effective tax rate from
the prior year was largely the result of proportionately higher foreign sourced income in 2009
compared to 2008 which is taxed at lower statutory rates, coupled with domestic benefits derived
from estimated tax losses. The Companys income tax provision for the nine months ended September
30, 2009 totaled $30.6 million, or 61.0% of pretax income, compared to $114.1 million, or 34.9% of
pretax income, for the nine months ended September 30, 2008. The effective tax rate for the nine
months ended September 30, 2009 was negatively impacted by a significant amount of the goodwill
impairment charges that were non-deductible for tax purposes. Excluding the goodwill impairment,
the effective tax rate for the nine months ended September 30, 2009 would have approximated 29.3%.
The decrease in the effective tax rate (excluding the goodwill impairment) from the prior year is
largely the result of proportionately higher foreign sourced income in 2009 compared to 2008, which
is taxed at lower statutory rates, coupled with domestic benefits derived from estimated tax
losses.
10. SEGMENT AND RELATED INFORMATION
In accordance with current accounting standards regarding disclosures about segments of an
enterprise and related information, the Company has identified the following reportable segments:
well site services, offshore products and tubular services. The Companys reportable segments are
strategic business units that offer different products and services. They are managed separately
because each business requires different technology and marketing strategies. Most of the
businesses were initially acquired as a unit, and the management at the time of the acquisition was
retained. Subsequent acquisitions have been direct extensions to our business segments. The
separate business lines within the well site services segment have been disclosed to provide
additional detail for that segment. Results of a portion of our Canadian business related to the
provision of work force accommodations, catering and logistics services are somewhat seasonal with
increased activity occurring in the winter drilling season.
12
Table of Contents
Financial information by business segment for each of the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2009 and 2008 is summarized in the following table (in thousands):
Revenues from | Depreciation | |||||||||||||||||||
unaffiliated | and | Operating | Capital | |||||||||||||||||
customers | amortization | income (loss) | expenditures | Total assets | ||||||||||||||||
Three months ended
September 30, 2009 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Well Site Services - |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accommodations |
$ | 110,299 | $ | 9,842 | $ | 26,575 | $ | 12,866 | $ | 553,059 | ||||||||||
Rental tools |
51,721 | 10,526 | (4,030 | ) | 7,482 | 339,200 | ||||||||||||||
Drilling and other |
18,380 | 6,585 | (3,697 | ) | 1,505 | 119,870 | ||||||||||||||
Total Well Site Services |
180,400 | 26,953 | 18,848 | 21,853 | 1,012,129 | |||||||||||||||
Offshore Products |
131,761 | 2,734 | 20,553 | 3,245 | 513,452 | |||||||||||||||
Tubular Services |
143,942 | 344 | 6,580 | 118 | 366,305 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate and Eliminations |
| 162 | (7,441 | ) | 164 | 14,710 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 456,103 | $ | 30,193 | $ | 38,540 | $ | 25,380 | $ | 1,906,596 | ||||||||||
Revenues from | Depreciation | |||||||||||||||||||
unaffiliated | and | Operating | Capital | |||||||||||||||||
customers | amortization | income (loss) | expenditures | Total assets | ||||||||||||||||
Three months ended
September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Well Site Services - |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accommodations |
$ | 105,380 | $ | 9,686 | $ | 23,695 | $ | 29,233 | $ | 525,780 | ||||||||||
Rental tools |
91,699 | 8,921 | 21,003 | 22,931 | 467,983 | |||||||||||||||
Drilling and other (1) |
52,086 | 5,272 | 14,833 | 14,005 | 200,161 | |||||||||||||||
Total Well Site Services |
249,165 | 23,879 | 59,531 | 66,169 | 1,193,924 | |||||||||||||||
Offshore Products |
120,008 | 3,033 | 20,273 | 2,749 | 499,239 | |||||||||||||||
Tubular Services |
445,617 | 340 | 68,261 | 1,022 | 513,520 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate and Eliminations |
| 73 | (6,555 | ) | 1,085 | 13,492 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 814,790 | $ | 27,325 | $ | 141,510 | $ | 71,025 | $ | 2,220,175 | ||||||||||
Revenues from | Depreciation | ||||||||||||||||||||
unaffiliated | and | Operating | Capital | ||||||||||||||||||
customers | amortization | income (loss) | expenditures | Total assets | |||||||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2009 |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Well Site Services - |
|||||||||||||||||||||
Accommodations |
$ | 340,531 | $ | 27,332 | $ | 100,588 | $ | 34,470 | $ | 553,059 | |||||||||||
Rental tools |
177,075 | 30,342 | (98,997 | ) | 24,252 | 339,200 | |||||||||||||||
Drilling and other |
46,525 | 19,501 | (13,504 | ) | 8,746 | 119,870 | |||||||||||||||
Total Well Site Services |
564,131 | 77,175 | (11,913 | ) | 67,468 | 1,012,129 | |||||||||||||||
Offshore Products |
382,271 | 8,171 | 59,287 | 9,143 | 513,452 | ||||||||||||||||
Tubular Services |
633,134 | 1,097 | 35,458 | 314 | 366,305 | ||||||||||||||||
Corporate and Eliminations |
| 420 | (22,630 | ) | 1,239 | 14,710 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 1,579,536 | $ | 86,863 | $ | 60,202 | $ | 78,164 | $ | 1,906,596 | |||||||||||
Revenues from | Depreciation | |||||||||||||||||||
unaffiliated | and | Operating | Capital | |||||||||||||||||
customers | amortization | income (loss) | expenditures | Total assets | ||||||||||||||||
Nine months ended September 30, 2008 |
||||||||||||||||||||
Well Site Services - |
||||||||||||||||||||
Accommodations |
$ | 332,518 | $ | 26,075 | $ | 93,761 | $ | 98,602 | $ | 525,780 | ||||||||||
Rental tools |
258,767 | 25,793 | 54,926 | 57,882 | 467,983 | |||||||||||||||
Drilling and other (1) |
133,316 | 14,119 | 31,679 | 34,429 | 200,161 | |||||||||||||||
Total Well Site Services |
724,601 | 65,987 | 180,366 | 190,913 | 1,193,924 | |||||||||||||||
Offshore Products |
386,780 | 8,545 | 66,656 | 12,629 | 499,239 | |||||||||||||||
Tubular Services |
936,020 | 1,004 | 106,533 | 1,941 | 513,520 | |||||||||||||||
Corporate and Eliminations |
| 205 | (19,687 | ) | 1,248 | 13,492 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 2,047,401 | $ | 75,741 | $ | 333,868 | $ | 206,731 | $ | 2,220,175 | ||||||||||
(1) | We have classified our equity interest in Boots & Coots and the notes receivable acquired in the transaction in which we sold our workover services business to Boots & Coots as Drilling and other. |
13
Table of Contents
11. ADOPTION OF NEW ACCOUNTING STANDARD ON ACCOUNTING FOR CONVERTIBLE DEBT
Effective January 1, 2009,
we adopted the new accounting standard on accounting for convertible debt instruments that can be
settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement). Under the new rules, for
convertible debt instruments that can be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion, an
entity is required to separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument
in a manner that reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This accounting
standard requires retrospective restatement of all periods presented back to the date of issuance
with the cumulative effect of the change in accounting principle on prior periods being recognized
as of the beginning of the first period. The adoption of this new accounting standard affects the
accounting, both retrospectively and prospectively, for our 2 3/8% Notes issued in June 2005.
Although the accounting standard has no impact on the Companys actual past or future cash flows,
it requires the Company to record a material increase in non-cash interest expense as the debt
discount is amortized.
The following tables present the effect of our adoption of this new accounting standard on our
condensed consolidated statements of income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2008
and our condensed consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008, applied retrospectively (in
thousands, except per share data):
Three months ended September 30, 2008 | Nine months ended September 30, 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Prior to | Effect of | As | Prior to | Effect of | As | |||||||||||||||||||
Adoption | adoption | adjusted | adoption | adoption | adjusted | |||||||||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 4,129 | $ | 1,527 | $ | 5,656 | $ | 13,917 | $ | 4,499 | $ | 18,416 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes (a) |
141,746 | (1,527 | ) | 140,219 | 331,770 | (4,499 | ) | 327,271 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income (a) |
89,153 | (974 | ) | 88,179 | 216,012 | (2,866 | ) | 213,146 | ||||||||||||||||
Net income attributable to
Oil States International,
Inc. (a) |
$ | 89,055 | $ | (974 | ) | $ | 88,081 | $ | 215,685 | $ | (2,866 | ) | $ | 212,819 | ||||||||||
Net income per share
attributable to Oil States
International common
stockholders: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | 1.79 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 1.77 | $ | 4.35 | $ | (0.06 | ) | $ | 4.29 | ||||||||||
Diluted |
$ | 1.70 | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 1.68 | $ | 4.15 | $ | (0.05 | ) | $ | 4.10 |
December 31, 2008 | ||||||||||||
Prior to | Effect of | |||||||||||
Adoption | adoption | As adjusted | ||||||||||
Other non-current assets |
$ | 55,085 | $ | (729 | ) | $ | 54,356 | |||||
Total assets |
2,299,247 | (729 | ) | 2,298,518 | ||||||||
Long-term debt |
$ | 474,948 | $ | (25,890 | ) | $ | 449,058 | |||||
Deferred income taxes |
55,646 | 9,134 | 64,780 | |||||||||
Total liabilities |
1,079,733 | (16,756 | ) | 1,062,977 | ||||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
425,284 | 28,449 | 453,733 | |||||||||
Retained earnings |
913,423 | (12,422 | ) | 901,001 | ||||||||
Total Oil States International, Inc. stockholders equity (a) |
1,218,993 | 16,027 | 1,235,020 | |||||||||
Total stockholders equity (a) |
1,219,514 | 16,027 | 1,235,541 | |||||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 2,299,247 | $ | (729 | ) | $ | 2,298,518 |
(a) | As adjusted for current accounting standards regarding noncontrolling interests. See Note 2 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q. |
Debt issue costs at December 31, 2008, recorded in other noncurrent assets,
decreased $0.7 million as a result of the adoption of this new accounting standard, representing
the cumulative adjustment caused by the reclassification of a portion of debt issue costs to
additional paid-in capital as required by the accounting standard.
The cumulative effect of the
change on retained earnings as of January 1, 2008, is $8.6 million due to the retrospective
increase in interest expense for the years 2005, 2006 and 2007.
14
Table of Contents
The following table presents the carrying amount of our 2 3/8% Notes in our condensed consolidated
balance sheets (in thousands):
September 30, 2009 | December 31, 2008 | |||||||
Carrying amount of the equity component in additional paid-in capital |
$ | 28,449 | $ | 28,449 | ||||
Principal amount of the liability component |
$ | 175,000 | $ | 175,000 | ||||
Less: Unamortized discount |
(20,874 | ) | (25,890 | ) | ||||
Net carrying amount of the liability component |
$ | 154,126 | $ | 149,110 | ||||
Following our adoption of the new accounting standard, the effective interest rate was
7.17% for our 2 3/8% Notes. Interest expense, excluding amortization of debt issue costs, was as
follows (in thousands):
Three months ended September 30, | Nine months ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 2,741 | $ | 2,624 | $ | 8,133 | $ | 7,787 |
September 30, 2009 | ||||
Remaining period over which discount will be amortized |
2.8 years | |||
Conversion price |
$ | 31.75 | ||
Number of shares to be delivered upon conversion |
530,303 | |||
Conversion value in excess of principal amount (in thousands) |
$ | 18,630 | ||
Derivative transactions entered into in connection with the convertible notes |
None |
12. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
The Company is a party to various pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative
proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning its commercial operations, products,
employees and other matters, including warranty and product liability claims and occasional claims
by individuals alleging exposure to hazardous materials as a result of its products or operations.
Some of these claims relate to matters occurring prior to its acquisition of businesses, and some
relate to businesses it has sold. In certain cases, the Company is entitled to indemnification from
the sellers of businesses, and in other cases, it has indemnified the buyers of businesses from it.
Although the Company can give no assurance about the outcome of pending legal and administrative
proceedings and the effect such outcomes may have on it, management believes that any ultimate
liability resulting from the outcome of such proceedings, to the extent not otherwise provided for
or covered by insurance, will not have a material adverse effect on its consolidated financial
position, results of operations or liquidity.
15
Table of Contents
This quarterly report on Form 10-Q contains certain forward-looking statements within the meaning
of Section 27A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1933 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides safe harbor provisions
for forward-looking information. Some of the information in the quarterly report may contain
forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements can be identified by the use of
forward-looking terminology including may, expect, anticipate, estimate, continue,
believe, or other similar words. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in
the forward-looking statements as a result of a number of important factors. For a discussion of
important factors that could affect our results, please refer to Item Part I, Item 1.A. Risk
Factors and the financial statement line item discussions set forth in Item 7. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on February 20, 2009. Should one or more of these risks or uncertainties materialize,
or should the assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may differ materially from those
expected, estimated or projected. Our management believes these forward-looking statements are
reasonable. However, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements,
which are based only on our current expectations and are not guarantees of future performance. All
subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us or to persons acting on
our behalf are expressly qualified in the entirety by the foregoing. Forward-looking statements
speak only as of the date they are made, and we undertake no obligation to publicly update or
revise any of them in light of new information, future events or otherwise.
In addition, in certain places in this quarterly report, we refer to reports published by third
parties that purport to describe trends or developments in the energy industry. The Company does
so for the convenience of our stockholders and in an effort to provide information available in the
market that will assist the Companys investors in a better understanding of the market environment
in which the Company operates. However, the Company specifically disclaims any responsibility for
the accuracy and completeness of such information and undertakes no obligation to update such
information.
ITEM 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
You should read the following discussion and analysis together with our consolidated financial
statements and the notes to those statements included elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form
10-Q.
Overview
We provide a broad range of products and services to the oil and gas industry through our
offshore products, tubular services and well site services business segments. Demand for our
products and services is cyclical and substantially dependent upon activity levels in the oil and
gas industry, particularly our customers willingness to spend capital on the exploration for and
development of oil and gas reserves. Demand for our products and services by our customers is
highly sensitive to current and expected oil and natural gas prices. Generally, our tubular
services and well site services segments respond more rapidly to shorter-term movements in oil and
natural gas prices except for our accommodations activities supporting oil sands developments which
we believe are more tied to the long-term outlook for crude oil prices. Our offshore products
segment provides highly engineered and technically designed products for offshore oil and gas
development and production systems and facilities. Sales of our offshore products and services
depend upon the development of offshore production systems and subsea pipelines, repairs and
upgrades of existing offshore drilling rigs and construction of new offshore drilling rigs and
vessels. In this segment, we are particularly influenced by global deepwater drilling and
production activities, which are driven largely by our customers longer-term outlook for oil and
natural gas prices. Through our tubular services segment, we distribute a broad range of casing
and tubing. Sales and gross margins of our tubular services segment depend upon the overall level
of drilling activity, the types of wells being drilled, and the overall industry level of OCTG
inventory and pricing. Historically, tubular services gross margin expands during periods of
rising OCTG prices and contracts during periods of decreasing OCTG prices. In our well site
services business segment, we provide land drilling services, work force accommodations and
associated services and rental tools. Demand for our drilling services is driven by land drilling
activity in our primary drilling markets in West Texas, Ohio and in the Rocky Mountains area in the
U.S. Our rental tools and services depend primarily upon the level of drilling, completion and
workover activity in North America. Our accommodations business is conducted principally in Canada
and its activity levels are currently being driven primarily by oil sands development activities in
northern Alberta.
16
Table of Contents
We have a diversified product and service offering which has exposure to activities conducted
throughout the oil and gas cycle. Demand for our tubular services, land drilling and rental tool
businesses is highly correlated to changes in the drilling rig count in the United States and
Canada. The table below sets forth a summary of North American rig activity, as measured by Baker
Hughes Incorporated, for the periods indicated.
Average Drilling Rig Count for | ||||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
U.S. Land |
940 | 1,909 | 1,031 | 1,806 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Offshore |
33 | 69 | 47 | 65 | ||||||||||||
Total U.S |
973 | 1,978 | 1,078 | 1,871 | ||||||||||||
Canada |
187 | 432 | 202 | 369 | ||||||||||||
Total North America |
1,160 | 2,410 | 1,280 | 2,240 | ||||||||||||
The average North American rig count for the three months ended September 30, 2009 decreased
by 1,250 rigs, or 51.9%, compared to the three months ended September 30, 2008. As of October 30,
2009, the North American rig count has increased to 1,318 rigs.
Beginning in late 2008 and into 2009, we saw unprecedented declines in the global economic
outlook that were initially fueled by the housing and credit crises. These market conditions
to reduced growth, and in some instances, decreased overall output. We believe there are now some
early signs that economic improvement is underway; however, the pace of improvement has been slow
and it is yet to be determined if there will be sustained long-term growth.
Although energy prices have recently increased compared to the declines witnessed in the first half
of 2009, our businesses have been and we expect will continue to be negatively impacted by excess
equipment and service capacity given reduced activity levels. Given our customers decreased cash
flows caused by comparatively lower energy prices as well as shrinking credit availability
affecting some of them, funds available for exploration and development have been reduced
substantially when compared to 2008. This has led to material declines in the drilling rig count,
particularly in North America. Assessing the current situation is challenging given the tenuous
state of the global economy and the financial and commodity markets. Although we believe our
Company remains financially strong with significant undrawn revolver capacity and cash on hand,
certain of our operations have been materially adversely affected by the reduced rig count in the
North American energy sector as well as the uncertainty about the level of future oil and natural
gas prices. We experienced a significant decline in the utilization of our land drilling rigs
beginning in late 2008 and continuing through the first half of 2009, with rig utilization
improving somewhat in the third quarter of 2009. In addition, in many instances our customers
have delayed or cancelled exploration and development plans and have sought pricing concessions
from us.
An additional important factor in our business, particularly in our land based North American
businesses, has been the successful development of several natural gas shale discoveries which we
support through our rental tool and OCTG businesses. Much of the continuing exploration and
development activity has focused in these shale areas leading us and many of our competitors to
relocate equipment to and also concentrate on these areas. This has led to increased competition
and lower pricing. Domestic U.S. natural gas prices have decreased from a peak of approximately
$13.00 per Mcf in July 2008 to recent levels of approximately $3.90 to $4.80 per Mcf. Many
analysts are expecting continued weakness in natural gas prices unless reduced drilling
activity and/or forced production shut-ins reverse gas supply excesses or demand for the commodity
increases. There is also the risk that, as a result of the success of exploration and development
activities in the shale areas coupled with the availability of increasing amounts of LNG, the supply of gas
will offset or mitigate the impact of gas shut-ins or demand increases resulting from improved
economic conditions. The rig count is not currently expected to recover to levels reached during
peak activity levels in 2008.
During 2009, we markedly reduced our expectations for the level of North American drilling
activity, which is the primary driver of our rental tools utilization and pricing. We considered
the factors driving these diminished expectations, among others, in assessing goodwill for
potential impairment. As a result of our assessment, we wrote off a total of $94.5 million, or
$82.7 million after tax, of goodwill in our rental tools reporting unit in the second
17
Table of Contents
quarter of 2009. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Should conditions related to our rental tools reporting unit deteriorate further, we could potentially write off all or part of that reporting units remaining goodwill balance of $74.5 million.
Crude oil prices fell to approximately $30 to $35 per barrel during the quarter ended March
31, 2009; however, oil prices have recovered somewhat since then. As of mid-October 2009, crude
oil was trading in a range of $73 to $80 per barrel which, though significantly improved, remains
far below its all time high closing price of $147 per barrel reached in July 2008. The current
crude oil prices have led to a partial recovery of drilling activity in the oil related rig count
in the United States and the sanctioning of some oil sands development projects in Canada.
However, it is unknown whether crude oil prices will stabilize at levels that will continue to
support significant levels of exploration and production because crude oil market demand
fundamentals remain weak and inventories for the resource are oversupplied.
For the first nine months of 2009, the Canadian dollar was valued at an average exchange rate
of U.S. $0.86 compared to U.S. $0.98 for the first nine months of 2008, a decrease of 12%. This
weakening of the Canadian dollar had a significant negative impact on the translation of earnings
generated from our Canadian subsidiaries.
The major U.S. steel mills increased OCTG prices during 2008 because of high product demand,
overall tight supplies and in response to raw material and other cost increases. However, steel
prices on a global basis have declined precipitously during 2009 and industry inventories have
increased materially as the rig count has declined. The OCTG Situation Report suggests that
industry OCTG inventory levels peaked in the first quarter of 2009 at approximately twenty months
supply on the ground and have trended down to approximately eleven months supply as the U.S. mills
have materially reduced output, imports of OCTG have declined and drilling activity has increased.
These trends have had a material detrimental impact on OCTG pricing and, accordingly, on our
revenues and margins realized during the second and third quarters of 2009 in our tubular services
segment. These trends, if continued for an extended period, could also negatively impact the
valuation of our OCTG inventory, potentially resulting in lower of cost or market write-downs in
the future.
We continue to monitor the effect of the financial crisis on the global economy, the demand
for crude oil and natural gas, and the resulting impact on the capital spending budgets of
exploration and production companies in order to estimate the effect on our Company. We have
reduced our capital spending significantly in 2009 compared to 2008. We currently expect that 2009
capital expenditures will total approximately $170 million compared to 2008 capital expenditures of
$247.4 million. Our 2009 capital expenditures include funding to complete projects in progress at
December 31, 2008, including (i) expansion of our Wapasu Creek accommodations facility in the
Canadian oil sands, (ii) international expansion at offshore products and (iii) ongoing maintenance
capital requirements. In our well site services segment, we continue to monitor industry capacity
additions and make future capital expenditure decisions based on a careful evaluation of both the
market outlook and industry fundamentals. In our tubular services segment, we remain focused on
industry inventory levels, future drilling and completion activity and OCTG prices. In response to
industry conditions and our corresponding decreased revenues, we have implemented a variety of cost
saving measures throughout our businesses, including headcount reductions and a decrease in
overhead costs.
There are several potential energy policy changes in Washington D.C. that will likely change
how energy in the United States is produced and consumed. Some of the major proposed policy
changes (which will not likely take effect or have a material impact in the near-term) focus on
creating energy standards and efficiencies, provide financing for clean energy generation, and
emphasize greater renewable energy usage. Other proposed policy changes focus on eliminating some
of the drilling tax incentives available to exploration and production companies, which would likely increase the cost of
drilling and, in turn, could negatively affect development plans of exploration and production companies and/or increase
the cost of energy to consumers. The companys management will not be in a position to assess the
full impact that the proposed policy changes will have on the energy industry until the policies
are adopted.
18
Table of Contents
Consolidated Results of Operations (in millions)
THREE MONTHS ENDED | NINE MONTHS ENDED | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
SEPTEMBER 30, | SEPTEMBER 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Variance | Variance | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 vs. 2008 | 2009 vs. 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | $ | % | 2009 | 2008 | $ | % | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Well Site Services - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accommodations |
$ | 110.3 | $ | 105.4 | $ | 4.9 | 5 | % | $ | 340.5 | $ | 332.5 | $ | 8.0 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Rental Tools |
51.7 | 91.7 | (40.0 | ) | (44 | %) | 177.1 | 258.8 | (81.7 | ) | (32 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Drilling and Other |
18.4 | 52.1 | (33.7 | ) | (65 | %) | 46.5 | 133.3 | (86.8 | ) | (65 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Well Site Services |
180.4 | 249.2 | (68.8 | ) | (28 | %) | 564.1 | 724.6 | (160.5 | ) | (22 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore Products |
131.8 | 120.0 | 11.8 | 10 | % | 382.3 | 386.8 | (4.5 | ) | (1 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tubular Services |
143.9 | 445.6 | (301.7 | ) | (68 | %) | 633.1 | 936.0 | (302.9 | ) | (32 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 456.1 | $ | 814.8 | $ | (358.7 | ) | (44 | %) | $ | 1,579.5 | $ | 2,047.4 | $ | (467.9 | ) | (23 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Product costs; Service
and other costs (Cost
of sales and service) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Well Site Services - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accommodations |
$ | 67.8 | $ | 65.3 | $ | 2.5 | 4 | % | $ | 196.6 | $ | 193.4 | $ | 3.2 | 2 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Rental Tools |
38.6 | 52.8 | (14.2 | ) | (27 | %) | 128.7 | 151.2 | (22.5 | ) | (15 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Drilling and Other |
14.8 | 31.2 | (16.4 | ) | (53 | %) | 38.4 | 85.2 | (46.8 | ) | (55 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Well Site Services |
121.2 | 149.3 | (28.1 | ) | (19 | %) | 363.7 | 429.8 | (66.1 | ) | (15 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore Products |
98.7 | 88.5 | 10.2 | 12 | % | 285.2 | 286.6 | (1.4 | ) | (0 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tubular Services |
133.9 | 371.6 | (237.7 | ) | (64 | %) | 586.8 | 816.5 | (229.7 | ) | (28 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 353.8 | $ | 609.4 | $ | (255.6 | ) | (42 | %) | $ | 1,235.7 | $ | 1,532.9 | $ | (297.2 | ) | (19 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Well Site Services - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accommodations |
$ | 42.5 | $ | 40.1 | $ | 2.4 | 6 | % | $ | 143.9 | $ | 139.1 | $ | 4.8 | 3 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Rental Tools |
13.1 | 38.9 | (25.8 | ) | (66 | %) | 48.4 | 107.6 | (59.2 | ) | (55 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Drilling and Other |
3.6 | 20.9 | (17.3 | ) | (83 | %) | 8.1 | 48.1 | (40.0 | ) | (83 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total Well Site Services |
59.2 | 99.9 | (40.7 | ) | (41 | %) | 200.4 | 294.8 | (94.4 | ) | (32 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore Products |
33.1 | 31.5 | 1.6 | 5 | % | 97.1 | 100.2 | (3.1 | ) | (3 | %) | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tubular Services |
10.0 | 74.0 | (64.0 | ) | (86 | %) | 46.3 | 119.5 | (73.2 | ) | (61 | %) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 102.3 | $ | 205.4 | $ | (103.1 | ) | (50 | %) | $ | 343.8 | $ | 514.5 | $ | (170.7 | ) | (33 | %) | ||||||||||||||
Gross margin as a
percentage of revenues |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Well Site Services - |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accommodations |
39 | % | 38 | % | 42 | % | 42 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Rental Tools |
25 | % | 42 | % | 27 | % | 42 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drilling and Other |
20 | % | 40 | % | 17 | % | 36 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total Well Site Services |
33 | % | 40 | % | 36 | % | 41 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Offshore Products |
25 | % | 26 | % | 25 | % | 26 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Tubular Services |
7 | % | 17 | % | 7 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
22 | % | 25 | % | 22 | % | 25 | % |
THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 COMPARED TO THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
We reported net income attributable to Oil States International, Inc. for the quarter ended
September 30, 2009 of $26.6 million, or $0.53 per diluted share. These results compare to net
income of $88.1 million, or $1.68 per diluted share, reported for the quarter ended September 30,
2008. Net income for the third quarter of 2008 included an after tax gain of $2.2 million, or
approximately $0.04 per diluted share, on the sale of 5.38 million shares of Boots & Coots
International Well Control, Inc. (Boots & Coots) common stock.
Revenues. Consolidated revenues decreased $358.7 million, or 44%, in the third quarter of
2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008.
Our well site services revenues decreased $68.8 million, or 28%, in the third quarter of 2009
compared to the third quarter of 2008. This decrease was primarily due to reductions in both
activity and pricing from the Companys North American drilling and rental tool operations as a
result of the 52% year-over-year decrease in the North American rig count, partially mitigated by
revenue growth in our accommodations business. Our rental tool
19
Table of Contents
revenues decreased $40.0 million,
or 44%, primarily due to lower rental tool utilization and pricing. Our drilling
services revenues decreased $33.7 million, or 65%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to
the third quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of reduced utilization in all three of our primary
drilling operating regions. Our accommodations business reported revenues in the third quarter of
2009 that were $4.9 million, or 5%, above the third quarter of 2008. The increase in the
accommodations revenue resulted from the expansion of our large accommodation facilities supporting
oil sands development activities in northern Alberta, Canada, partially offset by the weakening of
the Canadian dollar versus the U.S. dollar and lower accommodations activities in support of
conventional oil and gas drilling activity in Canada.
Our offshore products revenues increased $11.8 million, or 10%, in the third quarter of 2009
compared to the third quarter of 2008. This increase was primarily due to an increase in subsea
pipeline and bearings and connector revenues largely driven by international activity.
Tubular services revenues decreased $301.7 million, or 68%, in the third quarter of 2009
compared to the third quarter of 2008 as a result of a 60% decrease in tons shipped and a 20%
decrease in realized revenues per ton shipped in the third quarter of 2009 as a result of fewer
wells drilled and completed, coupled with excess industry inventories.
Cost of Sales and Service. Our consolidated cost of sales decreased $255.6 million, or 42%,
in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of
decreased cost of sales at tubular services of $237.7 million, or 64%, due to 60% lower tonnage
shipped. Our consolidated gross margin as a percentage of revenues declined from 25% in the third
quarter of 2008 to 22% in the third quarter of 2009 primarily due to lower margins realized in our
tubular services and well site services segments during 2009.
Our well site services segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues declined from 40% in
the third quarter of 2008 to 33% in the third quarter of 2009 despite modestly improved margins in
our accommodations business. Our accommodations gross margin as a percentage of revenues increased
from 38% in the third quarter of 2008 to 39% in the third quarter of 2009 primarily as a result of
a higher proportion of higher margin revenues from our large accommodation facilities supporting
oil sands development activities. Our rental tool gross margin as a percentage of revenues
declined from 42% in the third quarter of 2008 to 25% in the third quarter of 2009 primarily due to
the significant reduction in drilling and completion activity in both Canada and the U.S., which
negatively impacted demand for and pricing of our equipment and services. In addition, a portion
of our rental tool costs do not change proportionately with changes in revenue, leading to reduced
gross margin percentages. Our drilling services cost of sales decreased $16.4 million, or 53%, in
the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 as a result of significantly
reduced rig utilization in each of our drilling operating areas, which led to significant cost
reductions. This decline in drilling activity levels and competitive pricing pressures also
resulted in our drilling services gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreasing from 40% in
the third quarter of 2008 to 20% in the third quarter of 2009.
Our offshore products segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues was essentially
constant (26% in the third quarter of 2008 compared to 25% in the third quarter of 2009).
Tubular services segment cost of sales decreased by $237.7 million, or 64%, as a result of
lower tonnage shipped. Our tubular services gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased
from 17% in the third quarter of 2008 to 7% in the third quarter of 2009 due to excess industry
OCTG inventory levels in 2009 resulting in lower pricing and margins. The third quarter 2009 tubular services gross margin as a percentage of revenues benefited from a $1.0 million margin adjustment primarily related to pipe sales by a third-party affiliate made in prior periods.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A decreased $3.5 million, or 9%, in the
third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 due primarily to a decrease in accrued
incentive bonuses. In addition, our costs have decreased as a result of the implementation of cost
saving measures, including headcount reductions and reductions in overhead costs such as travel and
entertainment and office expenses, in response to industry conditions.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $2.9 million,
or 10%, in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 due primarily to capital
expenditures made during the previous twelve months largely related to our Canadian accommodations
business.
20
Table of Contents
Operating Income. Consolidated operating income decreased $103.0 million, or 73%, in the
third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of a decrease in
operating income from our tubular services segment of $61.7 million, or 90%, and a decrease in
operating income from our well site services segment of $40.7 million, or 68%.
Interest Expense and Interest Income. Net interest expense decreased by $1.1 million, or 24%,
in the third quarter of 2009 compared to the third quarter of 2008 due to reduced debt levels and
lower LIBOR interest rates applicable to borrowings under our revolving credit facility. The
weighted average interest rate on the Companys revolving credit facility was 1.6% in the third
quarter of 2009 compared to 3.7% in the third quarter of 2008. Interest income decreased as a
result of the repayment in 2009 of a note receivable from Boots & Coots and reduced cash balances
in interest bearing accounts.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates. Our equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates is $0.2 million, or 42%, lower in the third quarter of 2009 than in the third quarter of
2008 primarily due to the sale, in August of 2008, of our remaining investment in Boots & Coots.
Income Tax Expense. Our income tax provision for the three months ended September 30, 2009
totaled $8.6 million, or 24.3% of pretax income, compared to income tax expense of $52.0 million,
or 37.1% of pretax income, for the three months ended September 30, 2008. The decrease in the
effective tax rate from the prior year was largely the result of proportionately higher foreign
sourced income in 2009 compared to 2008 which is taxed at lower statutory rates, coupled with
domestic benefits derived from estimated tax losses.
NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2009 COMPARED TO NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
We reported net income attributable to Oil States International, Inc. for the nine months
ended September 30, 2009 of $19.2 million, or $0.39 per diluted share. These results compare to
net income of $212.8 million, or $4.10 per diluted share, reported for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008. The net income for the first nine months of 2009 included an after tax loss of
$82.7 million, or approximately $1.65 per diluted share, on the impairment of goodwill in our
rental tools reporting unit. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements included in this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Net income for the first nine months of 2008 included an after tax
gain of $4.0 million, or approximately $0.08 per diluted share, on the sale of 11.51 million shares
of Boots & Coots common stock.
Revenues. Consolidated revenues decreased $467.9 million, or 23%, in the first nine months of
2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008.
Our well site services revenues decreased $160.5 million, or 22%, in the first nine months of
2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008. This decrease was primarily due to reductions in
both activity and pricing from the Companys North American drilling and rental tool operations as
a result of the 43% year-over-year decrease in the North American rig count, partially mitigated by
revenue growth in our accommodations business. Our rental tool revenues decreased $81.7 million,
or 32%, primarily due to lower rental tool utilization and pricing. Our drilling services revenues
decreased $86.8 million, or 65%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months
of 2008 primarily as a result of reduced utilization in all three of our primary drilling operating
regions. Our accommodations business reported revenues in the first nine months of 2009 that were
$8.0 million, or 2%, above the first nine months of 2008. The increase in the accommodations
revenue resulted from the expansion of our large accommodation facilities supporting oil sands
development activities in northern Alberta, Canada and a $40.0 million increase in third-party
accommodations manufacturing revenues, partially offset by lower accommodations activities in
support of conventional oil and gas drilling activity in Canada and the weakening of the Canadian
dollar versus the U.S. dollar.
Our offshore products revenues decreased $4.5 million, or 1%, in the first nine months of 2009
compared to the first nine months of 2008. This decrease was primarily due to a decrease in
bearing and connectors revenue due to deepwater development project award delays.
21
Table of Contents
Tubular services revenues decreased $302.9 million, or 32%, in the first nine months of 2009
compared to the first nine months of 2008 as a result of a 45% decrease in tons shipped in the
first nine months of 2009, resulting from fewer wells drilled and completed in the period,
partially offset by a 23% increase in average selling prices.
Cost of Sales and Service. Our consolidated cost of sales decreased $297.2 million, or 19%,
in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008 primarily as a result of
decreased cost of sales at tubular services of $229.7 million, or 28%, and decreased cost of sales
at well site services of $66.1 million, or 15%. Our overall gross margin as a percentage of
revenues declined from 25% in the first nine months of 2008 to 22% in the first nine months of 2009
primarily due to lower margins realized in our tubular services and rental tool operations during
2009.
Our well site services segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues declined from 41% in
the first nine months of 2008 to 36% in the first nine months of 2009 despite flat margins in our
accommodations business. Our accommodations cost of sales included a $28.6 million increase in
third-party accommodations manufacturing and installation costs, which were only partially offset
by a reduction in costs stemming from the implementation of cost saving measures in response to the
lower conventional oil and gas drilling activity levels in Canada and the weakening of the Canadian
dollar versus the U.S. dollar. Our rental tool gross margin as a percentage of revenues declined
from 42% in the first nine months of 2008 to 27% in the first nine months of 2009 primarily due to
significant reductions in drilling and completion activity in both Canada and the U.S., which
negatively impacted pricing and demand for our equipment and services. In addition, a portion of
our rental tool costs do not change proportionately with changes in revenue, leading to reduced
gross margin percentages. Our drilling services cost of sales decreased $46.8 million, or 55%, in
the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008 as a result of
significantly reduced rig utilization in each of our drilling operating areas, which led to
significant cost reductions. This decline in drilling activity levels also resulted in our
drilling services gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreasing from 36% in the first nine
months of 2008 to 17% in the first nine months of 2009.
Our offshore products segment gross margin as a percentage of revenues was essentially
constant (26% in the first nine months of 2008 compared to 25% in the first nine months of 2009).
Tubular services segment cost of sales decreased by $229.7 million, or 28%, as a result of
lower tonnage shipped partially offset by higher priced OCTG inventory being sold. Our tubular
services gross margin as a percentage of revenues decreased from 13% in the first nine months of
2008 to 7% in the first nine months of 2009 due to excess industry-wide OCTG inventory levels in
2009 resulting in lower margins.
Selling, General and Administrative Expenses. SG&A decreased $3.2 million, or 3%, in the
first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008 due primarily to decreases in
accrued incentive bonuses. In addition, our costs have decreased as a result of the implementation
of cost saving measures, including headcount reductions and reductions in overhead costs such as
travel and entertainment and office expenses, in response to industry conditions. Decreases in
SG&A in the nine months ended September 30, 2009 compared to the nine months ended September 30,
2008 were partially offset by increases in ad valorem taxes and personnel and benefit costs at our
offshore products segment.
Depreciation and Amortization. Depreciation and amortization expense increased $11.1 million,
or 15%, in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the same period in 2008 due primarily to
capital expenditures made during the previous twelve months.
Impairment of Goodwill. We recorded a goodwill impairment of $94.5 million, before tax, in
the first nine months of 2009. The impairment was the result of our assessment of several factors
affecting our rental tools reporting unit. See Note 5 to the Consolidated Financial Statements
included in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Operating Income. Consolidated operating income decreased $273.7 million, or 82%, in the
first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008 primarily as a result of the
$94.5 million pre-tax goodwill impairment charge recorded in the first nine months of 2009 and a
decrease in operating income from our tubular and rental tool services operations.
22
Table of Contents
Interest Expense and Interest Income. Net interest expense decreased by $4.3 million, or 27%,
in the first nine months of 2009 compared to the first nine months of 2008 due to reduced debt
levels and lower LIBOR interest rates applicable to borrowings under our revolving credit facility.
The weighted average interest rate on the Companys revolving credit facility was 1.5% in the
first nine months of 2009 compared to 4.1% in the first nine months of 2008. Interest income
decreased as a result of the repayment in 2009 of a note receivable from Boots & Coots and reduced
cash balances in interest bearing accounts.
Equity in Earnings of Unconsolidated Affiliates. Our equity in earnings of unconsolidated
affiliates is $2.0 million, or 63%, lower in the first nine months of 2009 than in the first nine
months of 2008 primarily due to the sale, in August of 2008, of our remaining investment in Boots &
Coots.
Income Tax Expense. Our income tax provision for the first nine months of 2009 totaled $30.6
million, or 61.0%, of pretax income compared to $114.1 million, or 34.9%, of pretax income for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008. The effective tax rate in the first nine months of 2009 was
negatively impacted by a significant amount of the goodwill impairment charges which were
non-deductible for tax purposes. Excluding the goodwill impairment, the effective tax rate for the
first nine months of 2009 would have approximated 29.3%. The decrease in the effective rate
(excluding the goodwill impairment) from the prior year was largely the result of proportionately
higher foreign sourced income in 2009 compared to 2008 which is taxed at lower statutory rates,
coupled with domestic benefits derived from estimated tax losses.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The unprecedented disruption in the credit markets has had a significant adverse impact on a
number of financial institutions. To date, the Companys liquidity has not been materially
impacted by the current credit environment. The Company is not currently a party to any interest
rate swaps, currency hedges or derivative contracts of any type and has no exposure to commercial
paper or auction rate securities markets. Management will continue to closely monitor the
Companys liquidity and the overall health of the credit markets. However, management cannot
predict with any certainty the direct impact on the Company of any further or continued disruption
in the credit environment, although the Company is seeing the negative impact that such disruptions
are currently having on the energy market generally.
Our primary liquidity needs are to fund capital expenditures, which have included expanding
our accommodations facilities, expanding and upgrading our manufacturing facilities and equipment,
adding drilling rigs and increasing and replacing rental tool assets, funding new product
development and general working capital needs. In addition, capital has been used to fund strategic
business acquisitions. Our primary sources of funds have been cash flow from operations, proceeds
from borrowings under our bank facilities and proceeds from our $175 million convertible note
offering in 2005.
Cash totaling $352.3 million was provided by operations during the first nine months of 2009
compared to cash totaling $306.0 million provided by operations during the first nine months of
2008. During the first nine months of 2009, $149.5 million was provided by working capital,
primarily due to lower receivable levels resulting from decreased revenues and lower inventory
levels. During the first nine months of 2008, operating cash flow was increased by higher earnings
levels.
Cash was used in investing activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008
in the amount of $58.8 million and $206.1 million, respectively. Capital expenditures totaled
$78.2 million and $206.7 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2009 and 2008,
respectively. Capital expenditures in both years consisted principally of purchases of assets for
our well site services segment, and in particular for accommodations investments made in support of
Canadian oil sands development. In the nine months ended September 30, 2009, we received $21.2
million from Boots & Coots in full satisfaction of their note receivable.
In the nine months ended September 30, 2008, we spent cash of $29.8 million to acquire
Christina Lake Lodge in Northern Alberta, Canada to expand our oil sands capacity in our well site
services segment and to acquire a waterfront facility on the Houston ship channel for use in the
offshore products segment. There were no significant acquisitions made by the Company during the
nine months ended September 30, 2009.
23
Table of Contents
We have significantly reduced our capital spending in the first nine months of 2009 compared
to the same period in 2008. We currently expect to spend a total of approximately $170 million for
capital expenditures during 2009 to expand our Canadian oil sands related accommodations
facilities, to fund our other product and service offerings, and for maintenance and upgrade of our
equipment and facilities. This compares to $247 million of
capital expenditures made during
2008. We expect to fund these capital expenditures with internally generated funds and borrowings
under our revolving credit facility. If there is a significant decrease in demand for our products
and services as a result of further declines in the actual and longer term expected price of oil
and gas, we may further reduce our capital expenditures and experience reduced requirements for
working capital, especially in our tubular services segment, both of which would increase operating
cash flow and liquidity. However, such an environment might also increase the availability of
attractive acquisitions and if we decided to engage in such a transaction it would draw on such
liquidity.
Net cash of $267.6 million was used in financing activities during the nine months ended
September 30, 2009, primarily as a result of debt repayments under our revolving credit facility.
A total of $71.2 million was used in financing activities during the nine months ended September
30, 2008, primarily as a result of debt repayments.
We believe that cash from operations and available borrowings under our credit facilities will
be sufficient to meet our liquidity needs in the coming twelve months. If our plans or assumptions
change, or are inaccurate, or if we make further acquisitions, we may need to raise additional
capital. Acquisitions have been, and our management believes acquisitions will continue to be, a
key element of our business strategy. The timing, size or success of any acquisition effort and
the associated potential capital commitments are unpredictable. We may seek to fund all or part of
any such efforts with proceeds from debt and/or equity issuances. Our ability to obtain capital
for additional projects to implement our growth strategy over the longer term will depend upon our
future operating performance, financial condition and, more broadly, on the availability of equity
and debt financing. Capital availability will be affected by prevailing conditions in our
industry, the economy, the financial markets and other factors, many of which are beyond our
control. In addition, such additional debt service requirements could be based on higher interest
rates and shorter maturities and could impose a significant burden on our results of operations and
financial condition, and the issuance of additional equity securities could result in significant
dilution to stockholders.
Stock Repurchase Program. During the first quarter of 2005, our Board of Directors authorized
the repurchase of up to $50.0 million of our common stock, par value $.01 per share, over a two
year period. On August 25, 2006, an additional $50.0 million was approved and the duration of the
program was extended to August 31, 2008. On January 11, 2008, an additional $50.0 million was
approved for the repurchase program and the duration of the program was again extended to December
31, 2009. Through September 30, 2009, a total of $90.1 million of our stock (3,162,344 shares),
has been repurchased under this program, leaving a total of up to approximately $59.9 million
remaining available under the program to make share repurchases. We will continue to evaluate
future share repurchases in the context of allocating capital among other corporate opportunities
including capital expenditures and acquisitions and in the context of current conditions in the
credit and capital markets.
Credit Facility. On December 13, 2007, we entered into an Incremental Assumption Agreement
(Agreement) with the lenders and other parties to our existing credit agreement dated as of October
30, 2003 (Credit Agreement) in order to exercise the accordion feature (Accordion) available under
the Credit Agreement and extend the maturity to December 5, 2011. The Accordion increased the total
commitments under the Credit Agreement from $400 million to $500 million. In connection with the
execution of the Agreement, the Total U.S. Commitments (as defined in the Credit Agreement) were
increased from U.S. $300 million to U.S. $325 million, and the total Canadian Commitments (as
defined in the Credit Agreement) were increased from U.S. $100 million to U.S. $175 million. We
currently have 11 lenders in our Credit Agreement with commitments ranging from $15 million to
$102.5 million. While we have not experienced, nor do we anticipate, any difficulties in obtaining
funding from any of these lenders at this time, the lack of or delay in funding by a significant
member of our banking group could negatively affect our liquidity position.
As of September 30, 2009, we had $28.0 million outstanding under the Credit Facility and an
additional $21.7 million of outstanding letters of credit, leaving $450.3 million available to be
drawn under the facility. In addition, we have other floating rate bank credit facilities in the
U.S. and the U.K. that provide for an aggregate borrowing capacity of $8.2 million. As of
September 30, 2009, we had $2.2 million outstanding under these other facilities and an additional
$0.8 million of outstanding letters of credit leaving $5.2 million available to be drawn under
these
24
Table of Contents
facilities. Our debt represented 12.7% of our total debt and shareholders equity at
September 30, 2009 compared to 26.9% at December 31, 2008 and 23.1% at September 30, 2008.
As of September 30, 2009, we have classified the $175.0 million principal amount of our 2 3/8%
Notes as a noncurrent liability because certain contingent conversion thresholds based on the
Companys stock price were not met at that date and, as a result, note holders could not present
their notes for conversion during the quarter following the September 30, 2009 measurement date.
The future convertibility and resultant balance sheet classification of this liability will be
monitored at each quarterly reporting date and will be analyzed dependent upon market prices of the
Company common stock during the prescribed measurement periods.
In May 2008, the FASB issued a new accounting standard on the accounting for convertible debt
instruments that can be settled in cash upon conversion (including partial cash settlement), which
changed the accounting for our 2 3/8% Notes. Under the new rules, for convertible debt instruments
that can be settled entirely or partially in cash upon conversion, an entity is required to
separately account for the liability and equity components of the instrument in a manner that
reflects the issuers nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. This new accounting standard became
effective for the Company beginning January 1, 2009 and is applied retrospectively to all periods
presented. See Note 11 to the Unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements in this
quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
Critical Accounting Policies
In our selection of critical accounting policies, our objective is to properly reflect our
financial position and results of operations in each reporting period in a manner that will be
understood by those who utilize our financial statements. Often we must use our judgment about
uncertainties.
There are several critical accounting policies that we have put into practice that have an
important effect on our reported financial results.
Accounting for Contingencies
We have contingent liabilities and future claims for which we have made estimates of the
amount of the eventual cost to liquidate these liabilities or claims. These liabilities and claims
sometimes involve threatened or actual litigation where damages have been quantified and we have
made an assessment of our exposure and recorded a provision in our accounts to cover an expected
loss. Other claims or liabilities have been estimated based on our experience in these matters and,
when appropriate, the advice of outside counsel or other outside experts. Upon the ultimate
resolution of these uncertainties, our future reported financial results will be impacted by the
difference between our estimates and the actual amounts paid to settle a liability. Examples of
areas where we have made important estimates of future liabilities include litigation, taxes,
interest, insurance claims, warranty claims, contract claims and discontinued operations.
Tangible and Intangible Assets, including Goodwill
Our goodwill totals $217.6 million, or 11.4%, of our total assets, as of September 30, 2009.
The assessment of impairment on long-lived assets, intangibles and investments in unconsolidated
subsidiaries, is conducted whenever changes in the facts and circumstances indicate a loss in value
has occurred. The determination of the amount of impairment would be based on quoted market
prices, if available, or upon our judgments as to the future operating cash flows to be generated
from these assets throughout their estimated useful lives. Our industry is highly cyclical and our
estimates of the period over which future cash flows will be generated, as well as the
predictability of these cash flows and our determination of whether a decline in value of our
investment has occurred, can have a significant impact on the carrying value of these assets and,
in periods of prolonged down cycles, may result in impairment charges.
We review each reporting unit, as defined in current accounting standards regarding goodwill
and other intangible assets to assess goodwill for potential impairment. Our reporting units
include accommodations, rental tools, drilling, offshore products and tubular services. There is
no remaining goodwill in our drilling or tubular services reporting units subsequent to the full
write-off of goodwill at those reporting units as of December 31, 2008. As part of the goodwill
impairment analysis, we estimate the implied fair value of each reporting unit (IFV)
25
Table of Contents
and compare the IFV to the carrying value of such unit (the Carrying Value). Because none of
our reporting units has a publically quoted market price, we must determine the value that willing
buyers and sellers would place on the reporting unit through a routine sale process. In our
analysis, we target an IFV that represents the value that would be placed on the reporting unit by
market participants, and value the reporting unit based on historical and projected results
throughout a cycle, not the value of the reporting unit based on trough or peak earnings. We
utilize, depending on circumstances, trading multiples analyses, discounted projected cash flow
calculations with estimated terminal values and acquisition comparables to estimate the IFV. The
IFV of our reporting units is affected by future oil and gas prices, anticipated spending by our
customers, and the cost of capital. If the carrying amount of a reporting unit exceeds its IFV,
goodwill is considered to be potentially impaired and additional analysis in accordance with
current accounting standards is conducted to determine the amount of impairment, if any.
As part of our process to assess goodwill for impairment, we also compare the total market
capitalization of the Company to the sum of the IFVs of all of our reporting units to assess the
reasonableness of the IFVs in the aggregate.
Revenue and Cost Recognition
We recognize revenue and profit as work progresses on long-term, fixed price contracts using
the percentage-of-completion method, which relies on estimates of total expected contract revenue
and costs. We follow this method since reasonably dependable estimates of the revenue and costs
applicable to various stages of a contract can be made. Recognized revenues and profit are subject
to revisions as the contract progresses to completion. Revisions in profit estimates are charged to
income or expense in the period in which the facts and circumstances that give rise to the revision
become known. Provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are made in the period in
which losses are determined.
Valuation Allowances
Our valuation allowances, especially related to potential bad debts in accounts receivable and
to obsolescence or market value declines of inventory, involve reviews of underlying details of
these assets, known trends in the marketplace and the application of historical factors that
provide us with a basis for recording these allowances. If market conditions are less favorable
than those projected by management, or if our historical experience is materially different from
future experience, additional allowances may be required. We have, in past years, recorded a
valuation allowance to reduce our deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to
be realized.
Estimation of Useful Lives
The selection of the useful lives of many of our assets requires the judgments of our
operating personnel as to the length of these useful lives. Should our estimates be too long or
short, we might eventually report a disproportionate number of losses or gains upon disposition or
retirement of our long-lived assets. We believe our estimates of useful lives are appropriate.
26
Table of Contents
Stock Based Compensation
Since the adoption of the most recent accounting standards regarding share-based payments, we
are required to estimate the fair value of stock compensation made pursuant to awards under our
2001 Equity Participation Plan (Plan). An initial estimate of fair value of each stock option or
restricted stock award determines the amount of stock compensation expense we will recognize in the
future. To estimate the value of stock option awards under the Plan, we have selected a fair value
calculation model. We have chosen the Black Scholes closed form model to value stock options
awarded under the Plan. We have chosen this model because our option awards have been made under
straightforward and consistent vesting terms, option prices and option lives. Utilizing the Black
Scholes model requires us to estimate the length of time options will remain outstanding, a risk
free interest rate for the estimated period options are assumed to be outstanding, forfeiture
rates, future dividends and the volatility of our common stock. All of these assumptions affect
the amount and timing of future stock compensation expense recognition. We will continually
monitor our actual experience and change assumptions for future awards as we consider appropriate.
Income Taxes
In accounting for income taxes, we are required by the provisions of current accounting
standards regarding the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes to estimate a liability for
future income taxes. The calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in
the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit
issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and the extent to
which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is
unnecessary, we reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we
determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We record an additional charge in our
provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less
than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.
ITEM 3. | Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk |
Interest Rate Risk. We have revolving lines of credit that are subject to the risk of higher
interest charges associated with increases in interest rates. As of September 30, 2009, we had
floating rate obligations totaling approximately $30.2 million for amounts borrowed under our
revolving credit facilities. These floating-rate obligations expose us to the risk of increased
interest expense in the event of increases in short-term interest rates. If the floating interest
rate were to increase by 1% from September 30, 2009 levels, our consolidated interest expense would
increase by a total of approximately $0.3 million annually.
Foreign Currency Exchange Rate Risk. Our operations are conducted in various countries around
the world and we receive revenue from these operations in a number of different currencies. As
such, our earnings are subject to movements in foreign currency exchange rates when transactions
are (i) denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, which is our functional currency or
(ii) the functional currency of our subsidiaries, which is not necessarily the U.S. dollar. In
order to mitigate the effects of exchange rate risks, we generally pay a portion of our expenses in
local currencies and a substantial portion of our contracts provide for collections from customers
in U.S. dollars. During the first nine months of 2009, our realized foreign exchange losses were
$0.1 million and are included in other operating income in the consolidated statements of income.
ITEM 4. | Controls and Procedures |
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. As of the end of the period covered by this
Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, we carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the
participation of our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based upon that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2009 in ensuring that material
information was accumulated and communicated to management, and made known to our Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, on a timely basis to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act, including this Quarterly Report
on Form 10-Q, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in
the Commission rules and forms.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the three months ended September
30, 2009,
there were no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule
13a-15(f) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) or in other factors which have materially
affected our internal control over financial reporting, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect our internal control over financial reporting.
27
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. | Legal Proceedings |
We are a party to various pending or threatened claims, lawsuits and administrative
proceedings seeking damages or other remedies concerning our commercial operations, products,
employees and other matters, including occasional claims by individuals alleging exposure to
hazardous materials as a result of our products or operations. Some of these claims relate to
matters occurring prior to our acquisition of businesses, and some relate to businesses we have
sold. In certain cases, we are entitled to indemnification from the sellers of businesses and, in
other cases, we have indemnified the buyers of businesses from us. Although we can give no
assurance about the outcome of pending legal and administrative proceedings and the effect such
outcomes may have on us, we believe that any ultimate liability resulting from the outcome of such
proceedings, to the extent not otherwise provided for or covered by indemnity or insurance, will
not have a material adverse effect on our consolidated financial position, results of operations or
liquidity.
ITEM 1A. | Risk Factors |
Item 1A. Risk Factors of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008
(the 2008 Form 10-K) includes a detailed discussion of our risk factors. There have been no
significant changes to our risk factors as set forth in our 2008 Form 10-K.
ITEM 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities |
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None
Purchases of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchases
Total Number of | Approximate | |||||||||||||||
Shares Purchased | Dollar Value of Shares | |||||||||||||||
as Part of the Share | Remaining to be Purchased | |||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Average Price | Repurchase | Under the Share Repurchase | |||||||||||||
Period | Shares Purchased | Paid per Share | Program | Program | ||||||||||||
July 1,
2009 July 31, 2009 |
| | 3,162,344 | $ | 59,923,188 | |||||||||||
August 1,
2009 August 31,
2009 |
| | 3,162,344 | $ | 59,923,188 | |||||||||||
September 1, 2009
September 30, 2009 |
| | 3,162,344 | $ | 59,923,188 | (1) | ||||||||||
Total |
| | 3,162,344 | $ | 59,923,188 |
(1) | On March 2, 2005, we announced a share repurchase program of up to $50,000,000 over a two year period. On August 25, 2006, we announced the authorization of an additional $50,000,000 and the extension of the program to August 31, 2008. On January 11, 2008, an additional $50 million was approved for the repurchase program and the duration of the program was extended to December 31, 2009. |
ITEM 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities |
None
ITEM 4. | Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders |
None
28
Table of Contents
ITEM 5. | Other Information |
None
ITEM 6. | Exhibits |
(a) | INDEX OF EXHIBITS |
Exhibit No. | Description | |||
3.1
|
| Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the Commission on March 30, 2001). | ||
3.2
|
| Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 13, 2009). | ||
3.3
|
| Certificate of Designations of Special Preferred Voting Stock of Oil States International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the Commission on March 30, 2001). | ||
4.1
|
| Form of common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-43400)). | ||
4.2
|
| Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the Commission on March 30, 2001). | ||
4.3
|
| First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated May 17, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Commission on March 13, 2003). | ||
4.4
|
| Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 21, 2005 by and between Oil States International, Inc. and RBC Capital Markets Corporation (incorporated by reference to Oil States Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 23, 2005). | ||
4.5
|
| Indenture dated as of June 21, 2005 by and between Oil States International, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Oil States Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 23, 2005). | ||
4.6
|
| Global Notes representing $175,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 2 3/8% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2025 (incorporated by reference to Section 2.2 of Exhibit 4.5 hereof) (incorporated by reference to Oil States Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Commission on June 23, 2005 and July 13, 2005). | ||
10.11E
|
| Amendment No. 3, dated as of October 1, 2009, to the Credit Agreement among Oil States International, Inc., the lenders named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Lead Arranger, U.S. Administrative Agent and U.S. Collateral Agent; and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Canadian Administrative Agent and Canadian Collateral Agent; Capital One N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Syndication Agents and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Calyon New York Branch, as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11E to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 2, 2009). | ||
31.1*
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Oil States International, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||
31.2*
|
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Oil States International, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||
32.1**
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Oil States International, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||
32.2**
|
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Oil States International, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
* | Filed herewith | |
** | Furnished herewith. |
29
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
OIL STATES INTERNATIONAL, INC. | ||||||
Date: November 4, 2009
|
By | /s/ BRADLEY J. DODSON
|
||||
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer and | ||||||
Treasurer (Duly Authorized Officer and Principal | ||||||
Financial Officer) | ||||||
Date: November 4, 2009
|
By | /s/ ROBERT W. HAMPTON
|
||||
Senior Vice President Accounting and | ||||||
Secretary (Duly Authorized Officer and Chief | ||||||
Accounting Officer) |
30
Table of Contents
Exhibit Index
Exhibit No. | Description | |||||
3.1
|
| Amended and Restated Certificate of Incorporation (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the Commission on March 30, 2001). | ||||
3.2
|
| Third Amended and Restated Bylaws (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K, as filed with the Commission on March 13, 2009). | ||||
3.3
|
| Certificate of Designations of Special Preferred Voting Stock of Oil States International, Inc. (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the Commission on March 30, 2001). | ||||
4.1
|
| Form of common stock certificate (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Companys Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-43400)). | ||||
4.2
|
| Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.2 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2000, as filed with the Commission on March 30, 2001). | ||||
4.3
|
| First Amendment to the Amended and Restated Registration Rights Agreement dated May 17, 2002 (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.3 to the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2002, as filed with the Commission on March 13, 2003). | ||||
4.4
|
| Registration Rights Agreement dated as of June 21, 2005 by and between Oil States International, Inc. and RBC Capital Markets Corporation (incorporated by reference to Oil States Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 23, 2005). | ||||
4.5
|
| Indenture dated as of June 21, 2005 by and between Oil States International, Inc. and Wells Fargo Bank, National Association, as trustee (incorporated by reference to Oil States Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 23, 2005). | ||||
4.6
|
| Global Notes representing $175,000,000 aggregate principal amount of 2 3/8% Contingent Convertible Senior Notes due 2025 (incorporated by reference to Section 2.2 of Exhibit 4.5 hereof) (incorporated by reference to Oil States Current Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on June 23, 2005 and July 13, 2005). | ||||
10.11E
|
| Amendment No. 3, dated as of October 1, 2009, to the Credit Agreement among Oil States International, Inc., the lenders named therein and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as Lead Arranger, U.S. Administrative Agent and U.S. Collateral Agent; and The Bank of Nova Scotia, as Canadian Administrative Agent and Canadian Collateral Agent; Capital One N.A. and Royal Bank of Canada, as Co-Syndication Agents and JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. and Calyon New York Branch, as Co-Documentation Agents (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.11E to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 2, 2009). | ||||
31.1*
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Oil States International, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||||
31.2*
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Oil States International, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(a) or 15d-14(a) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | |||||
32.1**
|
| Certification of Chief Executive Officer of Oil States International, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. | ||||
32.2**
|
| Certification of Chief Financial Officer of Oil States International, Inc. pursuant to Rules 13a-14(b) or 15d-14(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. |
* | Filed herewith | |
** | Furnished herewith. |