OLD SECOND BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2014 June (Form 10-Q)

I  

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-Q

 

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014

OR

 

For transition period from          to          

 

Commission File Number 0 -10537

 

OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

37 South River Street, Aurora, Illinois     60507

(Address of principal executive offices)  (Zip Code)

 

(630) 892-0202

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☒        No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  Yes ☒ No ☐

 

Indicate by check mark whether registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).  (check one):

 

Large accelerated filer ☐   Accelerated filer ☐   Non-accelerated filer☐   (do not check if a smaller reporting company)  Smaller reporting company ☒

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2).

Yes ☐        No ☒

 

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock as of the latest practicable date: As of August 8, 2014, the Registrant had outstanding 29,442,508 shares of common stock, $1.00 par value per share.

 

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

OLD SECOND BANCORP, INC.

 

Form 10-Q Quarterly Report

 

Table of Contents

 

 

---

 

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.  Financial Statements

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(In thousands, except share data)

 

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

---

 

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(In thousands, except share data)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

---

 

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss)

(In thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

---

 

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(In thousands)

 

 

---

 

 

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows - Continued

(In thousands)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

---

 

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Consolidated Statements of Changes in

Stockholders’ Equity

(In thousands, except share data)

 

 

See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.

 

 

 

---

 

 

Old Second Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiaries

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements

(Table amounts in thousands, except per share data, unaudited)

 

Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

The accounting policies followed in the preparation of the interim consolidated financial statements are consistent with those used in the preparation of the annual financial information.  The interim consolidated financial statements reflect all normal and recurring adjustments, which are necessary, in the opinion of management, for a fair statement of results for the interim period presented.  Results for the period ended June 30, 2014, are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2014.  These interim consolidated financial statements are unaudited and should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and notes included in Old Second Bancorp, Inc.’s (the “Company”) annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.  Unless otherwise indicated, amounts in the tables contained in the notes to the consolidated financial statements are in thousands.  Certain items in prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current presentation.

 

The Company’s consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and follow general practices within the banking industry.  Application of these principles requires management to make estimates, assumptions, and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes.  These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the date of the consolidated financial statements.  Future changes in information may affect these estimates, assumptions, and judgments, which, in turn, may affect amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements.

 

All significant accounting policies are presented in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements included in the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.  These policies, along with the disclosures presented in the other financial statement notes and in this discussion, provide information on how significant assets and liabilities are valued in the consolidated financial statements and how those values are determined.

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In July 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2013-11 “Income Taxes (Topic 740) — Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” ASU 2013-11 amended existing guidance related to the presentation of an unrecognized tax benefit when a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss or a tax credit carryforward exists. These amendments provide that an unrecognized tax benefit, or a portion thereof, be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or a tax credit carryforward, except to the extent that a net operating loss carryforward, a similar tax loss, or  a tax credit carryforward is not available at the reporting date to settle any additional income taxes that would result from disallowance of a tax position, or the tax law does not require the entity to use, and the entity does not intend to use, the deferred tax asset for such purpose, then the unrecognized tax benefit should be presented as a liability.  These amendments are effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013, and are incorporated in the financial statements contained in this report.  The effect of adopting this standard does not have a material effect on the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

 

In January 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-04 Receivables — Troubled Debt Restructurings by Creditors (Subtopic 310-40) — “Reclassification of Residential Real Estate Collateralized Consumer Mortgage Loans upon Foreclosure.”  ASU 2014-04 is intended to reduce diversity in practice by clarifying when an in substance repossession or foreclosure occurs, that is, when a creditor should be considered to have received physical possession of residential real estate property collateralizing a consumer mortgage loan such that the loan should be derecognized and the real estate property recognized.  ASU 2014-04 requires a creditor to reclassify a collateralized consumer mortgage loan to real estate property upon obtaining legal title to the real estate collateral, or the borrower voluntarily conveying all interest in the real estate property to the lender to satisfy the loan through a deed in lieu of foreclosure or similar legal agreement.  ASU 2014-04 is effective for public business entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2014. For entities other than public business entities, the amendments in the ASU are effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2014, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect to the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

 

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09 "Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)."  The core principle of the guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods and services.  ASU 2014-09 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period.  The amendments can be applied retrospectively to each prior reporting period or retrospectively with the cumulative effect of initially

---

 

applying this update recognized at the date of initial application.  Early application is not permitted.  The Company is assessing the impact of ASU 2014-09 on its accounting and disclosures.

 

In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-12 "Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718) - Accounting for Share Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period."  ASU 2014-12 requires that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition.  ASU 2014-12 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015.  The amendments can be applied prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented and to all new or modified awards thereafter. Early adoption is permitted.  The adoption of this standard is not expected to have a material effect to the Company’s operating results or financial condition.

 

Note 2 – Securities

 

Investment Portfolio Management

 

Our investment portfolio serves the liquidity and income needs of the Company.  While the portfolio serves as an important component of the overall liquidity management at the Bank, portions of the portfolio will also serve as income producing assets.  The size and composition of the portfolio reflects liquidity needs, loan demand and interest income objectives.

 

Portfolio size and composition will be adjusted from time to time.  While a significant portion of the portfolio consists of readily marketable securities to address liquidity, other parts of the portfolio may reflect funds invested pending future loan demand or to maximize interest income without undue interest rate risk.

 

Investments are comprised of debt securities and non-marketable equity investments.  Securities available-for-sale are carried at fair value.  Unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, on securities available-for-sale are reported as a separate component of equity.  This balance sheet component changes as interest rates and market conditions change.  Unrealized gains and losses are not included in the calculation of regulatory capital.

 

Securities held-to-maturity are carried at amortized cost and the discount or premium created in the 2013 transfer from available-for-sale securities or at the time of purchase thereafter is accreted or amortized to the maturity or expected payoff date but not an earlier call.  In accordance with GAAP, the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold the securities to maturity.  The Company has followed and will follow GAAP on all securities holdings.

 

Nonmarketable equity investments include Federal Home Loan Bank of Chicago (“FHLBC”) stock and Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago (“Reserve Bank”) stock.  FHLBC stock was recorded at $5.5 million at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013.  Reserve Bank stock was recorded at $4.8 million at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013.  Our FHLBC stock is necessary to maintain access to FHLBC advances.

 

The following table summarizes the amortized cost and fair value of the securities portfolio at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses (in thousands):

 

 

 

---

 

 

 

The fair value, amortized cost and weighted average yield of debt securities at June 30, 2014, by contractual maturity, were as follows in the table below.  Securities not due at a single maturity date, primarily mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) and asset-backed securities are shown separately.

 

 

Securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, were as follows (in thousands except for number of securities):

 

 

---

 

 

 

Recognition of other-than-temporary impairment was not necessary in the six months ended June 30, 2014, or the year ended December 31, 2013.  The changes in fair value related primarily to interest rate fluctuations.  Our review of other-than-temporary impairment confirmed no credit quality deterioration. 

 

Note 3 – Loans

 

Major classifications of loans were as follows:

 

 

It is the policy of the Company to review each prospective credit in order to determine if an adequate level of security or collateral was obtained prior to making a loan.  The type of collateral, when required, will vary from liquid assets to real estate.  The Company’s access to collateral, in the event of borrower default, is assured through adherence to lending laws, the Company’s lending standards and credit monitoring procedures.  The Bank generally makes loans solely within its market area.  There are no significant concentrations of loans where the customers’ ability to honor loan terms is dependent upon a single economic sector although the real estate related categories listed above represent 88.3% and 89.0% of the portfolio at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively. 

 

---

 

Aged analysis of past due loans by class of loans were as follows:

 

 

 

 

1. The “All other” class includes overdrafts and net deferred costs.

 

Credit Quality Indicators:

 

The Company categorizes loans into credit risk categories based on current financial information, overall debt service coverage, comparison against industry averages, historical payment experience, and current economic trends.  This analysis includes loans with outstanding balances or commitments greater than $50,000 and excludes homogeneous loans such as home equity lines of credit and residential mortgages.  Loans with a classified risk rating are reviewed quarterly regardless of size or loan type.  The Company uses the following definitions for classified risk ratings:

 

Special Mention.  Loans classified as special mention have a potential weakness that deserves management’s close attention.  If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the loan at some future date.

 

Substandard. Loans classified as substandard are inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any.  Loans so classified have a well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize

---

 

the liquidation of the debt. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the institution will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

 

Doubtful.  Loans classified as doubtful have all the weaknesses inherent in those classified as substandard, with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable.

 

Credits that are not covered by the definitions above are pass credits, which are not considered to be adversely rated.

 

Credit Quality Indicators by class of loans were as follows:

 

 

 

1 The substandard credit quality indicator includes both potential problem loans that are currently performing and nonperforming loans

 

---

 

Impaired loans by class of loan were as follows:

 

 

---

 

Impaired loans by class of loans were as follows:

 

 

Troubled debt restructurings (“TDRs”) are loans for which the contractual terms have been modified and both of these conditions exist: (1) there is a concession to the borrower and (2) the borrower is experiencing financial difficulties.  Loans are restructured on a case-by-case basis during the loan collection process with modifications generally initiated at the request of the borrower.  These modifications may include reduction in interest rates, extension of term, deferrals of principal, and other modifications.  The Bank participates in the U.S. Department of the Treasury’s (the “Treasury”) Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”) which gives qualifying homeowners an opportunity to refinance into more affordable monthly payments.

 

The specific allocation of the allowance for loan losses on a TDR is determined by either discounting the modified cash flows at the original effective rate of the loan before modification or is based on the underlying collateral value less costs to sell, if repayment of the loan is collateral-dependent. If the resulting amount is less than the recorded book value, the Bank either establishes a valuation allowance (i.e. specific reserve) as a component of the allowance for loan losses or charges off the impaired balance if it determines that such amount is a confirmed loss. This method is used consistently for all segments of the portfolio. The allowance for loan losses also includes an allowance based on a loss migration analysis for each loan category on loans that are not individually evaluated for specific impairment. All loans charged-off, including TDRs charged-off, are factored into this calculation by portfolio segment.

---

 

 

TDRs that were modified during the period are as follows:

 

 

1  Other: Change of terms from bankruptcy court

2 HAMP: Home Affordable Modification Program

3 Deferral: Refers to the deferral of principal

 

TDRs are classified as being in default on a case-by-case basis when they fail to be in compliance with the modified terms. The following table presents TDRs that defaulted during the periods shown and were restructured within the 12 month period prior to default. There was no TDR default activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014.

 

 

 

 

---

 

Note 4 – Allowance for Loan Losses

 

Changes in the allowance for loan losses by segment of loans based on method of impairment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2014, were as follows:

 

 

1 As of June 30, 2014, this segment consisted of performing loans that included a higher risk pool of loans rated as substandard that totaled $3.2 million.  The amount of general allocation that was estimated for that portion of these performing substandard rated loans was $78,000 at June 30, 2014.

 

Changes in the allowance for loan losses by segment of loans based on method of impairment for the three and six months ended June 30, 2013, were as follows:

 

 

1 As of June 30, 2013, this segment consisted of performing loans that included a higher risk pool of loans rated as substandard that totaled $11.1 million.  The amount of general allocation that was estimated for that portion of these performing substandard rated loans was $2.9 million at June 30, 2013.

                           

---

 

Note 5 – Other Real Estate Owned

 

Details related to the activity in the other real estate owned (“OREO”) portfolio, net of valuation reserve, for the periods presented are itemized in the following table:

 

 

Activity in the valuation allowance was as follows:

 

 

Expenses related to foreclosed assets, net of lease revenue includes:

 

 

 

Note 6 – Deposits

 

Major classifications of deposits were as follows:

 

 

---

 

Note 7 – Borrowings

 

The following table is a summary of borrowings as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013.  Junior subordinated debentures are discussed in detail in Note 8:

 

 

The Company enters into deposit sweep transactions where the transaction amounts are secured by pledged securities.  These transactions consistently mature within 1 to 90 days from the transaction date and are governed by sweep repurchase agreements.  All sweep repurchase agreements are treated as financings secured by U.S. government agencies and collateralized mortgage-backed securities and had a carrying amount of $38.1 million at June 30, 2014, and $22.6 million at December 31, 2013. The fair value of the pledged collateral was $44.1 million and $39.2 million at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. At June 30, 2014, there was one customer with secured balances exceeding 10% of stockholders’ equity.

 

The Company’s borrowings at the FHLBC require the Bank to be a member and invest in the stock of the FHLBC and total borrowings are generally limited to the lower of 35% of total assets or 60% of the book value of certain mortgage loans and the fair value of investment securities.  As of June 30, 2014, there were no advances.  The Bank has FHLBC stock valued at $5.5 million, collateralized securities with a fair value of $82.6 million and loans with a principal balance of $54.1 million, which carry a combined collateral value of $115.8 million.  The Company has excess collateral of $114.5 million available to secure borrowings.

 

One of the Company’s most significant borrowing relationships continued to be the $45.5 million credit facility with a correspondent bank. That credit began in January 2008 and was originally composed of a $30.5 million senior debt facility, which included $500,000 in term debt, and $45.0 million of subordinated debt.  The subordinated debt and the term debt portion of the senior debt facility mature on March 31, 2018.  The interest rate on the senior debt facility resets quarterly and at the Company’s option, is based on, either the lender’s prime rate or three-month LIBOR plus 90 basis points.  The interest rate on the subordinated debt resets quarterly, and is equal to three-month LIBOR plus 150 basis points.  The Company had no principal outstanding balance on the senior line of credit when it matured.  The Company terminated the senior line of credit.  The Company had $500,000 in principal outstanding in term debt and $45.0 million in principal outstanding in subordinated debt at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013.  The term debt is secured by all of the outstanding capital stock of the Bank.  Pursuant to the Written Agreement (the “Written Agreement”) the Company entered into with the Reserve Bank, the Company was required to receive the Reserve Bank’s approval prior to making any interest payments on the subordinated debt.  In January 2014, the Reserve Bank notified the Company that the Written Agreement was terminated.

 

The agreement governing the credit facility contains usual and customary provisions regarding acceleration of the senior debt upon the occurrence of an event of default by the Company.  The term debt agreement also contains certain customary representations and warranties and financial and negative covenants.  At June 30, 2014, the Company was out of compliance with one of the financial covenants contained within the credit agreement.  Prior to 2013, the Company had been out of compliance with two of the financial covenants.  The agreement provides that noncompliance is an event of default and as the result of the Company’s failure to comply with a financial covenant, the lender may (i) terminate all commitments to extend further credit, (ii) increase the interest rate on the revolving line of the term debt by 200 basis points, (iii) declare the senior debt immediately due and payable and (iv) exercise all of its rights and remedies at law, in equity and/or pursuant to any or all collateral documents, including foreclosing on the collateral.  The total outstanding principal amount of the senior debt is the $500,000 in term debt, and because the subordinated debt is treated as Tier 2 capital, the agreement does not provide the lender with any additional rights of acceleration or other remedies upon an event of default caused by the Company’s failure to comply with a financial covenant.

 

Note 8 – Junior Subordinated Debentures

 

The Company completed the sale of $27.5 million of cumulative trust preferred securities by its unconsolidated subsidiary, Old Second Capital Trust I in June 2003.  An additional $4.1 million of cumulative trust preferred securities were sold in July 2003.  The trust preferred securities may remain outstanding for a 30-year term but, subject to regulatory approval, can be called in whole or in part by the Company after June 30, 2008.  When not in deferral, distributions on the securities are payable quarterly at an annual rate of 7.80%.  The Company issued a new $32.6 million subordinated debenture to Old Second Capital Trust I in return for the aggregate net proceeds of this trust preferred offering.  The interest rate and payment frequency on the debenture are equivalent to the cash distribution basis on the trust preferred securities.

 

---

 

The Company issued an additional $25.0 million of cumulative trust preferred securities through a private placement completed by an additional, unconsolidated subsidiary, Old Second Capital Trust II, in April 2007. These trust preferred securities also mature in 30 years, but subject to the aforementioned regulatory approval, can be called in whole or in part on a quarterly basis commencing June 15, 2017.  The quarterly cash distributions on the securities are fixed at 6.77% through June 15, 2017 and float at 150 basis points over three-month LIBOR thereafter.  The Company issued a new $25.8 million subordinated debenture to the Old Second Capital Trust II in return for the aggregate net proceeds of this trust preferred offering.  The interest rate and payment frequency on the debenture are equivalent to the cash distribution basis on the trust preferred securities.

 

Under the terms of the subordinated debentures issued to each of Old Second Capital Trust I and II, the Company is allowed to defer payments of interest for 20 quarterly periods without default or penalty, but such amounts will continue to accrue.  Also during the deferral period, the Company generally may not pay cash dividends on or repurchase its common stock or preferred stock, including the Series B Fixed Rate Cumulative Perpetual Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”), as discussed in Note 15.  In August of 2010, the Company elected to defer regularly scheduled interest payments on the $58.4 million of junior subordinated debentures.  Because of the deferral on the subordinated debentures, the trusts deferred regularly scheduled dividends on the trust preferred securities.  On April 21, 2014, the Company paid all outstanding interest, which totaled $19.7 million, on the trust preferred securities to the trustees for payment to holders as of the next record date set forth in the indentures and terminated the deferral period. Both of the debentures issued by the Company are disclosed on the Consolidated Balance Sheet as junior subordinated debentures and the related interest expense for each issuance is included in the Consolidated Statements of Income. 

 

Note 9 – Equity Compensation Plans

There are stock-based awards outstanding under the Company’s 2008 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2008 Plan”) and the Company’s 2014 Equity Incentive Plan (the “2014 Plan,” and together with the 2008 Plan, the “Plans”).  The 2014 Plan was approved at the 2014 annual meeting of stockholders.  Following approval of the 2014 Plan, no further awards will be granted under the 2008 Plan or any other Company equity compensation plan.  A maximum of 375,000 shares may be issued under the 2014 Plan.  The Plan authorizes the granting of qualified stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, and stock appreciation rights.  Awards may be granted to selected directors and officers or employees under the 2014 Plan at the discretion of the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors.  As of June 30, 2014, 210,500 shares remained available for issuance under the 2014 Plan.

Total compensation cost that has been charged for the plans was $82,000 in the first half of 2014 and $67,000 in the first half of 2013. 

 There were no stock options granted in the second quarter of 2014 or 2013.  All stock options are granted for a term of ten years.  There were no stock options exercised during the second quarter of 2014 or 2013.  There is no unrecognized compensation cost related to unvested stock options as all stock options of the Company’s common stock have vested.

A summary of stock option activity in the Plans for the six months ending June 30, 2014, is as follows:

 

 

Generally, restricted stock and restricted stock units granted under the Plans vest three years from the grant date, but the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors has discretionary authority to change some terms including the amount of time until the vest date.

 

Awards under the 2008 Plan will become fully vested upon a merger or change in control of the Company.  Under the 2014 Plan, upon a change in control of the Company, (i) stock options and stock appreciation rights generally will become fully vested, (ii) restricted stock awards and restricted stock units generally will become fully vested if the 2014 Plan is not an obligation of the successor entity following the change in control or the 2014 Plan is an obligation of the successor entity following the change in control or the 2014 Plan is an obligation of the successor entity following the change in control and the participant incurs an involuntary termination, and (iii) performance-based awards generally will vest based upon the level of achievement of the applicable performance measures through the change in control.

---

 

The company granted restricted stock under its equity compensation plans beginning in 2005 and it began granting restricted stock units in February 2009.  Restricted stock awards under the Plans generally entitle holders to voting and dividend rights upon grant and are subject to forfeiture until certain restrictions have lapsed including employment for a specific period.  Restricted stock units under the Plans are also subject to forfeiture until certain restrictions have lapsed including employment for a specific period, and generally entitle holders to receive dividend equivalents during the restricted period but do not entitle holders to voting rights until the restricted period ends and shares are transferred in connection with the units.

There were 184,500 restricted awards issued under the Plans during the second quarter of 2014 and 184,500 restricted awards issue during the six months ending June 30, 2014.  There were no restricted awards issued during the second quarter of 2013 and 155,500 restricted awards issued for the six months ending June 30, 2013.  Compensation expense is recognized over the vesting period of the restricted award based on the market value of the award at issue date.

 

A summary of changes in the Company’s unvested restricted awards for the six months ending June 30, 2014, is as follows:

 

 

Total unrecognized compensation cost of restricted awards was $1.1 million as of June 30, 2014, which is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.71 years.  Total unrecognized compensation cost of restricted awards was $462,000 as of June 30, 2013, which was expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 2.66 years.

 

---

 

Note 10 –Earnings Per Share

 

The earnings per share – both basic and diluted – are included below as of June 30 (in thousands except for share data):

 

 

The above earnings per share calculation did not include a warrant for 815,339 shares of common stock that was outstanding as of June 30, 2014, and June 30, 2013, because the warrant was anti-dilutive.  Of note, the warrant was sold at auction by the U.S. Treasury in June 2013.

 

The Company completed the redemption of 25,669 shares of its Series B Fixed Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock (the “Series B Stock”) in the quarter.  As previously disclosed, the Company completed a public offering of 15,525,000 shares of common stock in April.  Net proceeds of over $64.0 million were used to pay the accrued but unpaid interest on the Company’s  trust preferred securities or junior subordinated debentures discussed in Note 8, the accumulated but unpaid dividends on the Series B Stock and to complete this redemption.  The amount remaining after the completion of these transactions was retained at the Company for use in addressing general corporate matters.  The redemption price for such Series B Stock was 94.75% of the liquidation value of the Series B Stock provided that the holders of shares entered into agreements to forebear payment of dividends due and to waive any rights to such dividend upon redemption.  The Company redeemed all shares of Series B Stock held by directors of the Company on the same terms.

 

Note 11 – Regulatory & Capital Matters

 

The Bank is subject to the risk-based capital regulatory guidelines, which include the methodology for calculating the risk-weighted Bank assets, developed by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”) and the other bank regulatory agencies.  In connection with the current economic environment, the Bank’s current level of nonperforming assets and the risk-based capital guidelines, the Bank’s board of directors has determined that the Bank should maintain a Tier 1 leverage capital ratio at or above eight percent (8%) and a total risk-based capital ratio at or above twelve percent (12%).  The Bank currently exceeds those thresholds.  On May 16, 2011, the Bank, the wholly-owned banking subsidiary of the Company, entered into a Consent Order with the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the “OCC”).  Pursuant to the Consent Order, the Bank agreed to take certain actions and operate in compliance with the Consent Order’s provisions during its terms.  On October 17, 2013, the OCC terminated the Consent Order.

 

The Bank exceeded both board of directors’ capital ratio objectives.  At June 30, 2014, the Bank’s Tier 1 capital leverage ratio was 11.28%, up 31 basis points from December 31, 2013, and well above the 8.00% objective.  The Bank’s total capital ratio was 18.29%, up 25 basis points from December 31, 2013, and also well above the objective of 12.00%.

 

On July 22, 2011, the Company entered into a Written Agreement with the Reserve Bank designed to maintain the financial soundness of the Company. Pursuant to the Written Agreement, the Company took certain actions and operated in compliance with the Written Agreement’s provisions during its term.  On January 17, 2014, the Reserve Bank terminated the Written Agreement.  Although

---

 

the Written Agreement has been terminated, the Company expects that it will continue to seek approval from the Reserve Bank prior to paying any dividends on its capital stock and incurring any additional indebtedness.

 

Bank holding companies are required to maintain minimum levels of capital in accordance with capital guidelines implemented by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System.  The general bank and holding company capital adequacy guidelines are shown in the accompanying table, as are the capital ratios of the Company and the Bank, as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013.  The Company’s total risk-based capital ratio has been adjusted this quarter to correctly account for the Company's subordinated debt, a portion of which was excluded from Tier 2 capital because the subordinated debt is within five years of maturity.  This change has also been made in all relevant prior quarters and has resulted in an immaterial reduction in the Company's total risk-based capital ratio for those periods.  The reduction in regulatory capital amounts and ratios has no impact on the Company's historical consolidated financial statements or stockholders' equity, which were stated in accordance with GAAP..

 

The Company completed the redemption of certain of its Series B Fixed Rate Cumulative Preferred Stock (the “Series B Stock”) in the quarter.  The Company completed a public offering of common stock in April.  Net proceeds of over $64.0 million were used to pay the accrued but unpaid interest on trust preferred securities, the accumulated but unpaid dividends on the Series B Stock and to complete this redemption.  All ratios for June 30, 2014 reflect these changes in the Company’s capital.

 

At June 30, 2014, the Company, on a consolidated basis, exceeded the minimum thresholds to be considered “adequately capitalized” under current regulatory defined capital ratios.  The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies.

 

Capital levels and industry defined regulatory minimum required levels:

 

 

1 The Bank exceeded the general minimum regulatory requirements to be considered “well capitalized”.

 

The Company’s credit facility with Bank of America includes $45.0 million in subordinated debt.  That debt obligation qualifies at 60% and 80% of the original amount for Tier 2 regulatory capital at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively.  In addition, the trust preferred securities continue to qualify as Tier 1 regulatory capital, and the Company treats the maximum amount of this security type allowable under regulatory guidelines as Tier 1 capital.  As of June 30, 2014, all $56.6 million of the trust preferred proceeds qualified as Tier 1 regulatory capital.  As of December 31, 2013, trust preferred proceeds of $51.6 million qualified as Tier 1 regulatory capital and $5.0 million qualified as Tier 2 regulatory capital. All of the Series B Stock qualified as Tier 1 regulatory capital as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013.

 

---

 

Dividend Restrictions and Deferrals

 

In addition to the above requirements, banking regulations and capital guidelines generally limit the amount of dividends that may be paid by a Bank without prior regulatory approval.  Under these regulations, the amount of dividends that may be paid in any calendar year is limited to the current year’s profits, combined with the retained profit of the previous two years, subject to the capital requirements described above.  The Bank has the ability and the authority to pay dividends to the Company to pay debt and to meet preferred dividend requirements.

 

As discussed in Note 8, as of June 30, 2014, the Company had $58.4 million of junior subordinated debentures held by two statutory business trusts that it controls.  The Company has the right to defer interest payments on the debentures for a period of up to 20 consecutive quarters, and elected to begin such a deferral in August 2010.  However, all deferred interest must be paid before the Company may pay dividends on its common stock.  In the second quarter of 2014, the Company terminated the deferral period and paid all accumulated and unpaid interest on the junior subordinated debentures which totaled $19.7 million.

 

Furthermore, as with the debentures discussed above, the Company is prohibited from paying dividends on its common stock unless it has fully paid all deferred dividends on the Series B Stock. In August 2010, it also began to defer the payment of dividends on such Series B Stock. Therefore, in addition to paying all the accrued and unpaid distributions on the debentures set forth above, the Company must also fully pay all deferred and unpaid dividends on the Series B Stock before it may reinstate the payment of dividends on the common stock.

 

On April 15, 2014, the Company declared a dividend of approximately $15.8 million on its Series B Stock to stockholders of record on May 1, 2014.  Series B Stock dividends of $10.3 million were paid on May 15, 2014.

 

On April 28, 2014, the Company redeemed 25,669 shares of the Series B Stock from certain holders, which included certain of the Company’s directors, at a redemption price of 94.75% of the per share liquidation value, or $947.50 per share, for a total price of approximately $24.3 million.  The Company paid $22.9 million to a large private investor and an additional $1.4 million to Company directors for these purchases.  The holders of such shares waived their rights to any dividends on the Series B Stock, and such holders did not receive any part of the declared dividend on the Series B Stock. In May, the Company paid $10.3 million in Series B Stock dividends.  In the quarter, the Company also recognized benefit from $5.4 million in net income available to common stockholders reflecting both reversal of dividends previously accrued as well as dividends accumulated but not accrued by the Company and waived by holders upon redemption.

 

Further detail on the junior subordinated debentures, the Series B Stock and the deferral of interest and dividends thereon is described in Notes 8 and 15.

 

Note 12 – Fair Value Option and Fair Value Measurements

 

Fair value is defined as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date.  The fair value hierarchy established by the Company also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.  Three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value are:

 

Level 1:  Quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the ability to access as of the measurement date.

 

Level 2:  Significant observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, and other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

 

Level 3:  Significant unobservable inputs that reflect a company’s own view about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

 

Transfers between levels are deemed to have occurred at the end of the reporting period.  For the quarters ended June 30, 2014, and 2013 there were no significant transfers between levels.

 

---

 

Except for auction rate asset-backed securities, the majority of securities (available-for-sale and held-to-maturity) are valued by external pricing services or dealer market participants and are classified in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.  Both market and income valuation approaches are utilized.  Quarterly, the Company evaluates the methodologies used by the external pricing services or dealer market participants to develop the fair values to determine whether the results of the valuations are representative of an exit price in the Company’s principal markets and an appropriate representation of fair value.  The Company uses the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value:

 

 

---

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:

 

The tables below present the balance of assets and liabilities at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013, respectively, measured by the Company at fair value on a recurring basis:

 

 

 

 

---

 

The changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows:

 

 

 

The following table and commentary presents quantitative (dollars in thousands) and qualitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of June 30, 2014:

 

 

---

 

The following table and commentary presents quantitative (dollars in thousands) and qualitative information about Level 3 fair value measurements as of December 31, 2013:

 

 

 

The $125,000 on the state and political subdivisions line at June 30, 2014, under Level 3 represents a security from a small, local municipality.  Given the small dollar amount and size of the municipality involved, this is categorized as Level 3 based on the payment stream received by the Company from the municipality.  That payment stream is otherwise an unobservable input.

 

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis:

 

The Company may be required, from time to time, to measure certain other assets at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with GAAP.  These assets consist of impaired loans and OREO.  For assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2014, respectively, the following tables provide the level of valuation assumptions used to determine each valuation and the carrying value of the related assets:

 

 

1   Represents carrying value and related write-downs of loans for which adjustments are substantially based on the appraised value of collateral for collateral-dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $3.8 million, with a valuation allowance of $1.4 million, resulting in a decrease of specific allocations within the allowance for loan losses of $955,000 for the six months ending June 30, 2014.

 

2   OREO is measured at the lower of carrying or fair value less costs to sell, and had a net carrying amount of $39.2 million, which is made up of the outstanding balance of $58.9 million, net of a valuation allowance of $17.9 million and participations of $1.8 million, at June 30, 2014.

 

 

1   Represents carrying value and related write-downs of loans for which adjustments are substantially based on the appraised value of collateral for collateral-dependent loans, had a carrying amount of $11.5 million, with a valuation allowance of $2.4 million, resulting in a decrease of specific allocations within the provision for loan losses of $3.9 million for the year ending December 31, 2013.

 

2   OREO is measured at the lower of carrying or fair value less costs to sell, and had a net carrying amount of $41.5 million, which is made up of the outstanding balance of $65.9 million, net of a valuation allowance of $22.3 million and participations of $2.1 million, at December 31, 2013.

 

The Company also has assets that under certain conditions are subject to measurement at fair value on a nonrecurring basis.  These assets include OREO and impaired loans.  The Company has estimated the fair values of these assets based primarily on Level 3 inputs.  OREO and impaired loans are generally valued using the fair value of collateral provided by third party appraisals.  These valuations include assumptions related to cash flow projections, discount rates, and recent comparable sales.  The numerical range of unobservable inputs for these valuation assumptions are not meaningful.

---

 

 

Note 13 – Financial Instruments with Off-Balance Sheet Risk and Derivative Transactions

 

To meet the financing needs of its customers, the Bank, as a subsidiary of the Company, is a party to various financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in the normal course of business.  These off-balance-sheet financial instruments include commitments to originate and sell loans as well as financial standby, performance standby and commercial letters of credit.  The instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheet.  The Bank’s exposure to credit loss for loan commitments and letters of credit is represented by the dollar amount of those instruments.  Management generally uses the same credit policies and collateral requirements in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance-sheet instruments.

 

Interest Rate Swaps

 

The Bank also has interest rate derivative positions to assist with risk management that are not designated as hedging instruments.  These derivative positions relate to transactions in which the Bank enters an interest rate swap with a client while at the same time entering into an offsetting interest rate swap with another financial institution.  Due to financial covenant violations relating to nonperforming loans, the Bank had $3.2 million in investment securities pledged to support interest rate swap activity with three correspondent financial institutions at June 30, 2014.  The Bank had $3.1  million in investment securities pledged to support interest rate swap activity with three correspondent financial institutions at December 31, 2013.  In connection with each transaction, the Bank agreed to pay interest to the client on a notional amount at a variable interest rate and receive interest from the client on the same notional amount at a fixed interest rate.

 

At the same time, the Bank agreed to pay another financial institution the same fixed interest rate on the same notional amount and receive the same variable interest rate on the same notional amount.  The transaction allows the client to convert a variable rate loan to a fixed rate loan and is part of the Company’s interest rate risk management strategy.  Because the Bank acts as an intermediary for the client, changes in the fair value of the underlying derivative contracts offset each other and do not generally affect the results of operations.  Fair value measurements include an assessment of credit risk related to the client’s ability to perform on their contract position, however, and valuation estimates related to that exposure are discussed in Note 12 above.  At June 30, 2014, the notional amount of non-hedging interest rate swaps was $21.3 million with a weighted average maturity of 2.6 years.  At December 31, 2013, the notional amount of non-hedging interest rate swaps was $51.9 million with a weighted average maturity of 1.5 years.  The Bank offsets derivative assets and liabilities that are subject to a master netting arrangement.

 

The Bank also grants mortgage loan interest rate lock commitments to borrowers, subject to normal loan underwriting standards.  The interest rate risk associated with these loan interest rate lock commitments is managed with contracts for future deliveries of loans as well as selling forward mortgage-backed securities contracts.  Loan interest rate lock commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee.  Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements.  Commitments to originate residential mortgage loans held-for-sale and forward commitments to sell residential mortgage loans or forward MBS contracts are considered derivative instruments and changes in the fair value are recorded to mortgage banking revenue.  Fair values are estimated based on observable changes in mortgage interest rates including mortgage-backed securities prices from the date of the commitment.

 

The following table presents derivatives not designated as hedging instruments as of June 30, 2014, and periodic changes in the values of the interest rate swaps are reported in other noninterest income.  Periodic changes in the value of the forward contracts related to mortgage loan origination are reported in the net gain on sales of mortgage loans.

 

 

1Includes unused loan commitments and interest rate lock commitments.

2Includes forward MBS contracts and forward loan contracts.

 

---

 

The following table presents derivatives not designated as hedging instruments as of December 31, 2013.

 

 

1Includes unused loan commitments and interest rate lock commitments.

2Includes forward MBS contracts.

 

The Bank also issues letters of credit, which are conditional commitments that guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  The credit risk involved and collateral obtained in issuing letters of credit are essentially the same as that involved in extending loan commitments to our customers.

 

In addition to customer related commitments, the Company is responsible for letters of credit commitments that relate to properties held in OREO.  The following table represents the Company’s contractual commitments due to letters of credit as of June 30, 2014, and December 31, 2013.

 

The following table is a summary of financial instrument commitments (in thousands):

 

 

 

 

Note 14 – Fair Values of Financial Instruments

 

The estimated fair values approximate carrying amount for all items except those described in the following table.  Investment security fair values are based upon market prices or dealer quotes, and if no such information is available, on the rate and term of the security.  The carrying value of FHLBC stock approximates fair value as the stock is nonmarketable and can only be sold to the FHLBC or another member institution at par. During the years ended December 31, 2013, and 2012, the Company participated in multiple redemptions with the FHLBC and using the redemption values as the carrying value, FHLBC stock is carried at a Level 2 fair value since December 31, 2012.  The Company had no redemptions in the second quarter of 2014.  Fair values of loans were estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics, such as type and fixed or variable interest rate terms.  Cash flows were discounted using current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar ratings and for similar maturities.  The fair value of time deposits is estimated using discounted future cash flows at current rates offered for deposits of similar remaining maturities.  The fair values of borrowings were estimated based on interest rates available to the Company for debt with similar terms and remaining maturities.  The fair value of off balance sheet volume is not considered material.

 

---

 

The carrying amount and estimated fair values of financial instruments were as follows:

 

 

 

 

Note 15 – Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B Stock”)

 

The Series B Stock was issued as part of the Treasury’s Troubled Asset Relief Program and Capital Purchase Program ( the “CPP”). as implemented by the Treasury.  The Series B Stock qualifies as Tier 1 capital and pays cumulative dividends on the liquidation preference amount on a quarterly basis at a rate of 5% per annum for the first five years, and 9% per annum thereafter effective in February 2014.  Concurrent with issuing the Series B Stock, the Company issued to the Treasury a ten year warrant to purchase 815,339 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $13.43 per share.

 

Subsequent to the Company’s receipt of the $73.0 million in proceeds received from the Treasury in the first quarter of 2009, the Company allocated the proceeds between the Series B Stock and the warrant that was issued. The Company recorded the warrant as

---

 

equity, and the allocation was based on their relative fair values in accordance with accounting guidance.  The fair value was determined for both the Series B Stock and the warrants as part of the allocation process in the amounts of $68.2 million and $4.8 million, respectively.

 

As discussed in Note 11, on August 31, 2010, the Company announced that it would begin deferring quarterly cash dividends on its outstanding Series B Stock.  Further, as discussed in Note 8 and Note 11, the Company also elected to defer interest payments on certain of its subordinated debentures. However, under the terms of the Series B Stock, if the Company fails to pay dividends for an aggregate of six quarters on the Series B Stock, whether or not consecutive, the holders have the right to appoint representatives to the Company’s board of directors.  As the Company elected to defer dividends for more than six quarters, a new director was appointed by the Treasury to join the board during the fourth quarter of 2012.  The terms of the Series B Stock also prevent the Company from paying cash dividends or generally repurchasing its common stock while Series B Stock dividends are in arrears.

 

The Treasury sold all of the Series B Stock held to third parties, including certain of our directors, in auctions that were completed in the first quarter of 2013.  The Treasury also sold the warrant to a third party at a subsequent auction.  Upon completion by Treasury of the auction, the Company’s board affirmed the director appointed by Treasury to ongoing board membership, and the Series B director was elected by the holders of the Series B Stock at the Company’s 2013 annual meeting.

 

As a result of the completed 2013 auctions, the Company’s Board elected to stop accruing the dividend on the Series B Stock in first quarter 2013.  Previously, the Company had accrued the dividend on the Series B Stock quarterly throughout the deferral period.  Given the discount reflected in the results of the auction, the board believed that the Company would likely be able to redeem  the Series B Stock at a price less than the face amount of the Series B Stock plus accrued and unpaid dividends.  In the second quarter 2014, the Company completed redemption of 25,669 shares of its Series B Stock at a price equal to 94.75% of liquidation value provided that the holders of shares entered into agreements to forebear payment of dividends due and to waive any rights to such dividends upon redemption.  While the Company did not fully accrue the dividend on the Series B Stock in the 2013 first quarter and did not accrue for it in subsequent quarters, the Company continued to evaluate whether accruing dividends on the Series B Stock was appropriate.  The Company resumed accrual in second quarter 2014.  The Company currently intends to declare and pay future dividends on these shares.  Payments of $24.3 million resulted in redemption of 25,669 shares of Series B Stock.  At June 30, 2014, the Company carried $47.3 million of Series B Stock in total stockholders’ equity.  At December 31, 2013, the Company carried $72.9 million of Series B Stock in total stockholders’ equity.

 

Note 16 – Income Taxes

 

Income tax expense (benefit) for year to date June 30, 2014 and June 30, 2013 was as follows:

 

 

---

 

The following were the components of the deferred tax assets and liabilities as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:

 

 

At June 30, 2014, the Company had $84.2 million federal net operating loss carryforward of which, $25.3 million expires in 2030, $31.4 million expires in 2031, $8.6 million expires in 2032, $15.3 million expires in 2033, and $3.6 million expires in 2034.  The Company had $128.5 million state net operating loss carryforward of which, $29.4 million expires in 2021, $95.7 million expires in 2025, and $3.4 million expires in 2026.  In addition, the Company had $1.4 million alternative minimum tax credit subject to indefinite carryforward.

 

The components of the provision for deferred income tax expense (benefit) were as follows:

 

 

---

 

Effective tax rates differ from federal statutory rates applied to financial statement income (loss) due to the following: