OLYMPIC STEEL INC - Quarter Report: 2005 September (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2005
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission
File Number 0-23320
OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio | 34-1245650 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number) |
5096 Richmond Road, Bedford Heights, Ohio | 44146 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (216) 292-3800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company
(as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date:
Class | Outstanding as of November 7, 2005 | |
Common stock, without par value | 10,153,829 |
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Index to Form 10-Q
Index to Form 10-Q
Page 2 of 29
Table of Contents
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 4,431 | $ | 4,684 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
92,461 | 93,336 | ||||||
Inventories |
103,290 | 186,124 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
2,932 | 3,163 | ||||||
Total current assets |
203,114 | 287,307 | ||||||
Property and equipment, at cost |
154,883 | 153,235 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(75,642 | ) | (69,664 | ) | ||||
Net property and equipment |
79,241 | 83,571 | ||||||
Investments in joint ventures |
2,037 | 2,311 | ||||||
Deferred financing fees, net |
255 | 957 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 284,647 | $ | 374,146 | ||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 492 | $ | 4,892 | ||||
Accounts payable |
53,900 | 63,680 | ||||||
Accrued payroll |
6,466 | 16,778 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
7,852 | 10,338 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
68,710 | 95,688 | ||||||
Credit facility revolver |
9,612 | 58,638 | ||||||
Term loans |
| 29,212 | ||||||
Industrial revenue bonds |
2,908 | 3,280 | ||||||
Total long-term debt |
12,520 | 91,130 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
10,404 | 10,803 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
91,634 | 197,621 | ||||||
Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock |
| | ||||||
Common stock |
104,953 | 103,252 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
88,060 | 73,273 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
193,013 | 176,525 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 284,647 | $ | 374,146 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.
Page 3 of 29
Table of Contents
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share and tonnage data)
Three Months Ended | Nine Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
September 30, | September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Tons sold |
||||||||||||||||
Direct |
256,211 | 283,098 | 840,727 | 906,166 | ||||||||||||
Toll |
49,367 | 40,332 | 143,350 | 146,477 | ||||||||||||
305,578 | 323,430 | 984,077 | 1,052,643 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 208,358 | $ | 244,142 | $ | 734,398 | $ | 653,948 | ||||||||
Costs and expenses |
||||||||||||||||
Cost of materials sold (exclusive of depreciation shown below) |
175,056 | 178,576 | 615,674 | 464,369 | ||||||||||||
Warehouse and processing |
10,266 | 10,142 | 30,958 | 32,451 | ||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
6,950 | 11,703 | 23,267 | 34,740 | ||||||||||||
Distribution |
5,279 | 4,482 | 15,438 | 14,264 | ||||||||||||
Selling |
3,032 | 4,331 | 11,830 | 15,411 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
1,960 | 1,999 | 6,008 | 6,146 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
990 | 1,328 | 3,628 | 3,917 | ||||||||||||
Asset impairment charge |
| | | 487 | ||||||||||||
Total costs and expenses |
203,533 | 212,561 | 706,803 | 571,785 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
4,825 | 31,581 | 27,595 | 82,163 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) from joint ventures |
(564 | ) | 58 | (121 | ) | 230 | ||||||||||
Income before financing costs and income taxes |
4,261 | 31,639 | 27,474 | 82,393 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other expense on debt |
742 | 1,069 | 3,430 | 3,514 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
3,519 | 30,570 | 24,044 | 78,879 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
1,355 | 11,998 | 9,257 | 30,960 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,164 | $ | 18,572 | $ | 14,787 | $ | 47,919 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.46 | $ | 4.89 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
10,153 | 9,904 | 10,127 | 9,791 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 4.70 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
10,445 | 10,341 | 10,446 | 10,195 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 4 of 29
Table of Contents
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
(in thousands)
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from (used for) operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 14,787 | $ | 47,919 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from
operating activities |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
6,710 | 7,297 | ||||||
(Income) loss from joint ventures, net of distributions |
274 | (218 | ) | |||||
Asset impairment charge |
| 487 | ||||||
Loss on disposition of property and equipment |
17 | 58 | ||||||
Long-term deferred income taxes |
(399 | ) | 8,249 | |||||
21,389 | 63,792 | |||||||
Changes in working capital: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
875 | (51,774 | ) | |||||
Inventories |
82,834 | (55,082 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
231 | 1,661 | ||||||
Accounts payable |
(9,780 | ) | 25,086 | |||||
Accrued payroll and other accrued liabilities |
(12,146 | ) | 22,681 | |||||
62,014 | (57,428 | ) | ||||||
Net cash from operating activities |
83,403 | 6,364 | ||||||
Cash flows from (used for) investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(1,695 | ) | (1,698 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from disposition of property and equipment |
| 123 | ||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(1,695 | ) | (1,575 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from (used for) financing activities: |
||||||||
Credit facility revolver repayments, net |
(49,026 | ) | (364 | ) | ||||
Repayments of long-term debt |
(33,984 | ) | (4,137 | ) | ||||
Credit facility fees and expenses |
| (541 | ) | |||||
Repayment of Officer note receivable |
| 675 | ||||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee
stock purchases |
1,049 | 1,308 | ||||||
Net cash used for financing activities |
(81,961 | ) | (3,059 | ) | ||||
Cash: |
||||||||
Net change |
(253 | ) | 1,730 | |||||
Beginning balance |
4,684 | 3,087 | ||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 4,431 | $ | 4,817 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 5 of 29
Table of Contents
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
September 30, 2005
(1) Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the financial records of
Olympic Steel, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively Olympic or the Company),
without audit and reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion of
management, necessary to fairly present the results of the interim periods covered by this report.
Year-to-date results are not necessarily indicative of 2005 annual results and these financial
statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2004 Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
period ended December 31, 2004. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in consolidation. Investments in the Companys joint ventures are accounted for under
the equity method.
(2) Accounts Receivable:
The Company maintained allowances for doubtful accounts and unissued credits of $5.5 million and
$4.3 million at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The allowance for doubtful
accounts is maintained at a level considered appropriate based on historical experience and
specific customer collection issues that have been identified. Estimations are based upon a
calculated percentage of accounts receivable, which remains fairly level from year to year, and
judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers, which can
fluctuate significantly from year to year. The Company cannot guarantee that the rate of future
credit losses will be similar to past experience. The Company considers all available information
when assessing each quarter the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts.
Page 6 of 29
Table of Contents
(3) Inventories:
Steel inventories consist of the following:
September 30, | December 31, | |||||||
(in thousands) | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||
Unprocessed |
$ | 75,670 | $ | 141,578 | ||||
Processed and finished |
27,620 | 44,546 | ||||||
Totals |
$ | 103,290 | $ | 186,124 | ||||
(4) Investments in Joint Ventures:
The Companys two joint ventures are Olympic Laser Processing, LLC (OLP), a company that processes
laser welded steel sheet blanks for the automotive industry, and G.S.P., LLC (GSP), a certified
Minority Business Enterprise company supporting the flat-rolled steel requirements of the
automotive industry. As of September 30, 2005, Olympic guaranteed 50% of OLPs $14.3 million and
49% of GSPs $3.7 million of outstanding debt on a several basis.
The following table sets forth selected data for the Companys OLP joint venture:
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
Results of Operations: | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 11,055 | $ | 7,291 | $ | 27,926 | $ | 23,566 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
2,107 | 2,581 | 8,877 | 8,955 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(396 | ) | (299 | ) | 816 | (119 | ) | |||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (582 | ) | $ | (456 | ) | $ | 268 | $ | (607 | ) |
The Company records 50% of OLPs net income or loss to its Consolidated Statements of Operations as
Income (Loss) from Joint Ventures.
Page 7 of 29
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth selected data for the Companys GSP joint venture:
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
Results of Operations: | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 3,164 | $ | 4,412 | $ | 15,933 | $ | 11,049 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
(181 | ) | 988 | 837 | 2,249 | |||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(502 | ) | 613 | (362 | ) | 1,146 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (557 | ) | $ | 584 | $ | (520 | ) | $ | 1,088 |
The Company records 49% of GSPs net income or loss to its Consolidated Statements of Operations as
Income (Loss) from Joint Ventures.
(5) Debt:
The Companys secured bank-financing agreement (the Credit Facility) is a revolving credit facility
collateralized by the Companys accounts receivable, inventories, and substantially all of the
property and equipment. Borrowings are limited to the lesser of a borrowing base, comprised of
eligible receivables and inventories, or $110 million in the aggregate. In June 2005, the Company
entered into an amendment of the Credit Facility which: (i) extended the maturity date of the
existing Credit Facility from December 15, 2006 to December 15, 2008; and (ii) added an accordion
feature which allows the Company to add up to $25 million of availability at a future date. The
Company has the option to borrow based on the agents base rate or Eurodollar Rates (EURO) plus a
premium. The Companys effective borrowing rate, inclusive of deferred financing fees, for the
first nine months of 2005 was 6.1% compared to 5.6% for the comparable period in 2004.
Fees and expenses associated with origination and amendments of the Credit Facility are being
amortized to Interest and Other Expense on Debt.
Page 8 of 29
Table of Contents
The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with various covenants, the most significant of
which include: (i) minimum availability of $10 million, tested monthly, (ii) a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.25, and a maximum leverage ratio of 1.75, which are tested quarterly, (iii)
restrictions on additional indebtedness, and (iv) limitations on capital expenditures.
As of September 30, 2005, the Company has $13.0 million of outstanding debt, which consisted of
$7.2 million of revolver borrowings and industrial revenue bonds and $5.8 million of checks issued
by the Company that have not cleared the bank. During October 2005, the Company repaid the
remaining $7.2 million of outstanding debt. The Company had over $100 million of availability
under its Credit Facility as of November 1, 2005 and it is in compliance with its covenants.
(6) Discontinued Operations:
In 2002, the Company closed its unprofitable tube processing operation (Tubing) in Cleveland, Ohio.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS No. 144), Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Tubing was accounted for as a discontinued
operation and its assets were written down to their estimated fair value less costs to sell. The
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations reflects a $487 thousand asset impairment charge
in 2004 which reduced the carrying value of the assets held for sale to its then estimated fair
value of $150 thousand. The assets were sold in the third quarter of 2004 for $150 thousand.
Page 9 of 29
Table of Contents
(7) Shares Outstanding and Earnings Per Share:
Earnings per share have been calculated based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding
as set forth below:
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
10,153 | 9,904 | 10,127 | 9,791 | ||||||||||||
Assumed exercise of stock options |
292 | 437 | 319 | 404 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares |
10,445 | 10,341 | 10,446 | 10,195 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,164 | $ | 18,572 | $ | 14,787 | $ | 47,919 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.46 | $ | 4.89 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 4.70 | ||||||||
(8) Stock Options:
At September 30, 2005, stock options to purchase 753,845 shares were outstanding, of which 635,845
were exercisable at prices ranging from $1.97 to $15.50 per share, none of which were
anti-dilutive.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS No. 123), Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for
stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has chosen to continue to
account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related
Interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if
any, of the quoted market price of the Companys stock at the date of the grant over the amount an
employee must pay to acquire the stock.
Page 10 of 29
Table of Contents
If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the options
granted at the grant date under SFAS No. 123, net income and earnings per share would have been
reduced by the amounts shown below:
For the Three Months | For the Nine Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended September 30, | Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 2,164 | $ | 18,572 | $ | 14,787 | $ | 47,919 | ||||||||
Pro forma expense, net of tax |
(2 | ) | (383 | ) | (348 | ) | (1,108 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 2,162 | $ | 18,189 | $ | 14,439 | $ | 46,811 | ||||||||
Basic net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 1.88 | $ | 1.46 | $ | 4.89 | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 1.84 | $ | 1.43 | $ | 4.78 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 1.80 | $ | 1.42 | $ | 4.70 | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.21 | $ | 1.76 | $ | 1.38 | $ | 4.59 | ||||||||
(9) Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid during the first nine months of 2005 and 2004 totaled $3.0 million and $2.4 million,
respectively. Taxes paid during the first nine months of 2005 and 2004 totaled $10.2 million and
$15.5 million, respectively.
Page 11 of 29
Table of Contents
(10) Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 151 (SFAS No. 151), Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB No. 43,
Chapter 4 which clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs
and wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current period charges. In addition, SFAS
No. 151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based
on the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of SFAS No. 151 are effective
for inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of
SFAS No. 151 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123-R (SFAS No.
123-R). SFAS No. 123-R establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which an entity
exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an
entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the
entitys equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those securities. SFAS No.
123-R also requires an entity to recognize the cost of employee services received in share-based
payment transactions, thereby reflecting the economic consequences of those transactions in the
financial statements. SFAS No. 123-R applies to all awards granted on or after July 1, 2005, and
to awards modified, vested, repurchased, or canceled after that date. In April 2005, the FASB
delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 123-R, so that it applies to our annual period beginning on
January 1, 2006. Due to the relatively few number of stock options vesting after the effective
date, SFAS No. 123-R is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements
unless additional stock option grants are awarded.
Page 12 of 29
Table of Contents
Item 2. | Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations |
The following discussion and analysis of our financial conditions and results are based upon the
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions
or conditions. On an ongoing basis, we monitor and evaluate our estimates and assumptions.
For further information regarding the accounting policies that we believe to be critical accounting
policies and that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing our
consolidated financials statements, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2004.
Overview
Our results of operations are affected by numerous external factors, such as general and global
business, economic and political conditions, competition, steel pricing and availability, energy
prices, pricing and availability of raw materials used in the production of steel, customer demand
for steel and their ability to manage their credit line availability and layoffs or work stoppages
by our own, our suppliers or our customers personnel.
We sell a broad range of products, many of which have different gross profits and margins.
Products that have more value-added processing generally have a greater gross profit and higher
margins. Accordingly, our overall gross profit is affected by, among other things, product mix,
the amount of processing performed, the availability of steel, volatility in selling prices and
material purchase costs. We also perform toll processing of customer-owned steel, the majority of
which is performed in our Detroit and Georgia operations.
Our two joint ventures are Olympic Laser Processing, LLC (OLP), a company that processes laser
welded sheet steel blanks for the automotive industry, and G.S.P., LLC (GSP), a certified Minority
Business Enterprise company supporting the flat-rolled steel requirements of the
Page 13 of 29
Table of Contents
automotive industry. Our 50% interest in OLP and 49% interest in GSP are accounted for under the
equity method.
Financing costs include interest expense on debt and deferred financing and bank amendment fees
amortized to expense.
We sell certain products internationally. All international sales and payments are made in United
States dollars. Recent international sales have been immaterial to our consolidated financial
results.
In 2002, we closed our unprofitable tube processing operation (Tubing) in Cleveland, Ohio. In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS No. 144), Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Tubing was accounted for as a discontinued
operation and its assets were written down to their estimated fair value less costs to sell. The
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations reflects a $487 thousand asset impairment charge
which reduced the carrying value of the assets held for sale to its then estimated fair value of
$150 thousand. The assets were sold in the third quarter of 2004 for $150 thousand.
We have four collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 185 employees at our
Minneapolis and Detroit facilities. The collective bargaining agreement for employees at our
Minneapolis coil facility was extended to September 30, 2010. An agreement covering other
Minneapolis employees expires in 2006, while agreements covering Detroit employees expire in 2007
and 2009. We have never experienced a work stoppage and we believe that our relationship with our
employees is good. However, any prolonged work stoppages by our personnel represented by collective
bargaining units could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results
of operations or cash flows.
Page 14 of 29
Table of Contents
Results of Operations
The following table sets forth certain income statement data for the three and nine month periods
ended September 30, 2005 (dollars are shown in thousands):
For the Three Months Ended September 30, | For the Nine Months Ended September 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | % of net sales | $ | % of net sales | $ | % of net sales | $ | % of net sales | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 208,358 | 100.0 | % | $ | 244,142 | 100.0 | % | $ | 734,398 | 100.0 | % | $ | 653,948 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Gross profit (1) |
33,302 | 16.0 | % | 65,566 | 26.9 | % | 118,724 | 16.2 | % | 189,579 | 29.0 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating expenses (2) |
28,477 | 13.7 | % | 33,985 | 13.9 | % | 91,129 | 12.4 | % | 107,416 | 16.4 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
Operating income |
$ | 4,825 | 2.3 | % | $ | 31,581 | 12.9 | % | $ | 27,595 | 3.8 | % | $ | 82,163 | 12.6 | % |
(1) | Gross profit is calculated as net sales less the cost of materials sold, exclusive of depreciation. | |
(2) | Operating expenses are calculated as total costs and expenses less the cost of materials sold. |
Tons sold decreased 5.5% to 306 thousand in the third quarter of 2005 from 323 thousand in the
third quarter of 2004. Tons sold in the third quarter of 2005 included 256 thousand from direct
sales and 50 thousand from toll processing, compared with 283 thousand direct tons and 40 thousand
toll tons in the comparable period of last year. Tons sold in the first nine months of 2005
decreased 6.5% to 984 thousand from 1.05 million last year. Tons sold in the first nine months
included 841 thousand from direct sales and 143 thousand from toll processing, compared with 906
thousand direct tons and 146 thousand toll tons in the comparable period of last year. The
decreases in tons sold for the 2005 periods were primarily attributable to reduced sales to
automotive customers, reduced sales to other service centers and lower overall demand across most
sectors in 2005 when compared to 2004.
Net sales decreased 14.7% to $208.4 million in the third quarter of 2005 from $244.1 million in the
third quarter of 2004. For the first nine months of 2005, net sales increased 12.3% to $734.4
million from $653.9 million in the comparable 2004 period. Average selling prices for the third
quarter of 2005 decreased 9.7% from last years third quarter and decreased 10.0% from the second
quarter of 2005. Higher levels of inventory held by steel service centers and end-use customers
led to competitive pressures and reduced selling prices during the second and third quarters of
2005. Average selling prices began increasing during the end of the third quarter of 2005 and we
expect that trend to continue into the fourth quarter of 2005.
Page 15 of 29
Table of Contents
As a percentage of net sales, gross profit (exclusive of depreciation) decreased to 16.0% in the
third quarter of 2005 from 26.9% in the third quarter of 2004. For the first nine months of 2005,
gross profit decreased to 16.2% from 29.0% in the comparable 2004 period. As the base price of
steel declined, competitive pressures resulted in lower current selling prices and gross margin
percentages during the first nine months of 2005. Gross margin levels began increasing during the
end of the third quarter of 2005 and we expect that trend to continue into the fourth quarter of
2005.
Operating expenses in the third quarter of 2005 decreased 16.2% to $28.5 million from $34.0 million
in last years third quarter. For the first nine months of 2005, operating expenses decreased
15.2% to $91.1 million from $107.4 million in the comparable 2004 period. The decreases in
operating expenses are primarily the result of lower variable compensation in 2005. As a
percentage of net sales, operating expenses decreased to 13.7% for the third quarter of 2005 from
13.9% in the comparable 2004 period. For the first nine months of 2005, operating expenses
decreased to 12.4% of net sales from 16.4% in the last years comparable period.
Loss from joint ventures totaled $564 thousand in the third quarter of 2005, compared to income of
$58 thousand in the third quarter of 2004. For the first nine months of 2005, loss from joint
ventures totaled $121 thousand, compared to income of $230 thousand
in 2004. We expect joint venture losses to continue in the fourth
quarter.
Financing costs totaled $742 thousand for the third quarter of 2005 compared to $1.1 million for
the third quarter of 2004. For the first nine months of 2005, financing costs decreased to $3.4
million from $3.5 million in 2004. Our effective borrowing rate, inclusive of deferred financing
fees, for the first nine months of 2005 was 6.1% compared to 5.6% in 2004. At the end of the third
quarter of 2005, we had reduced our total debt by $69.6 million to $13.0 million, which consisted
of $7.2 million of revolver borrowings and industrial revenue bonds and $5.8 million of outstanding
checks. During October 2005, we repaid the remaining $7.2 million of outstanding debt and, as of
November 1, 2005, we had over $100 million of availability under the Credit
Facility. We expect debt levels to remain low during the fourth quarter of 2005.
For the third quarter of 2005, income before income taxes totaled $3.5 million compared to $30.6
million in the third quarter of 2004. An income tax provision of 38.5% was recorded for the third
quarter of 2005, compared to a provision of 39.2% for the third quarter of 2004. For the
Page 16 of 29
Table of Contents
first
nine months of 2005, income before taxes totaled $24.0 million compared to $78.9 million for the
first nine months of 2004. An income tax provision of 38.5% was recorded during the first nine
months of 2005 compared to a 39.2% provision recorded during the comparable 2004 period. The
effective tax rate decreased in 2005 due to our estimated benefit of the
manufacturing deduction provided by The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. We expect the
effective tax rate to approximate 38.5% for the remainder of 2005. Taxes paid totaled $127
thousand and $11.4 million for the third quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively. Taxes paid during
the first nine months of 2005 totaled $10.2 million compared to $15.5 million for the comparable
2004 period.
Net income for the third quarter of 2005 totaled $2.2 million or $.21 per diluted share, compared
to net income of $18.6 million or $1.80 per diluted share for the third quarter of 2004. Net
income for the first nine months of 2005 totaled $14.8 million or $1.42 per diluted share, compared
to $47.9 million or $4.70 per diluted share in the first nine months of 2004.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital requirements include funding working capital needs, purchasing and upgrading
processing equipment and facilities, and investing in joint ventures. We use cash generated from
operations, leasing transactions, and our credit facility to fund these requirements.
Working capital at September 30, 2005 decreased $57.2 million from the end of the prior year.
Significant working capital changes included an $82.8 million decrease in inventories from December
31, 2004, an $875 thousand decrease in accounts receivable, offset by decreases of $9.8 million in
accounts payable and $12.8 million in accrued payroll and accrued liabilities.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2005, we generated $83.4 million of net cash from
operations, of which $21.4 million was derived from cash earnings and $62.0 million from working
capital reductions. We used $82.0 million to pay down debt and $1.7 million for capital spending.
Over the next 18 months, we expect to increase our capital spending
significantly over recent levels. We also anticipate using our
financial position to take advantage of a consolidating service center industry.
Page 17 of 29
Table of Contents
Our secured bank-financing agreement (the Credit Facility) is a revolving credit facility
collateralized by our accounts receivable, inventories, and substantially all of our property and
equipment. Borrowings are limited to the lesser of a borrowing base, comprised of eligible
receivables and inventories, or $110 million in the aggregate. In June 2005, we entered into an
amendment of the Credit Facility which: (i) extended the maturity of the existing Credit Facility
from December 15, 2006 to December 15, 2008; and (ii) added an accordion feature which allows us to
add up to $25 million of availability at a future date.
Fees and expenses associated with the origination and amendments of the Credit Facility are being
amortized to interest and other expense on debt.
The Credit Facility requires us to comply with various covenants, the most significant of which
include: (i) minimum availability of $10 million, tested monthly, (ii) a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.25, and a maximum leverage ratio of 1.75, which are tested quarterly, (iii)
restrictions on additional indebtedness, and (iv) limitations on capital expenditures. At November
1, 2005, we had over $100 million of availability under our Credit Facility and we were in
compliance with our covenants.
We believe that funds available under our Credit Facility, together with funds generated from
operations, will be sufficient to provide us with the liquidity necessary to fund anticipated
working capital requirements and capital expenditure requirements over the next 12 months. Capital
requirements are subject to change as business conditions warrant and opportunities arise.
Page 18 of 29
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Information
This document contains various forward-looking statements and information that are based on
managements beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to
management. When used in this document, the words anticipate, expect, believe, estimate,
project, plan and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements,
which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions
including, but not limited to:
| general and global business, economic and political conditions; | ||
| competitive factors such as availability and pricing of steel, industry inventory levels and rapid fluctuations in customer demand and pricing; | ||
| the cyclicality and volatility within the steel industry; | ||
| the ability of customers (especially in the automotive industry) to maintain their credit availability; | ||
| layoffs or work stoppages by our own or our suppliers or customers personnel; | ||
| the availability of transportation and logistical services; | ||
| equipment malfunctions or installation delays; | ||
| the successes of our strategic efforts and initiatives to increase sales volumes, improve cash flows and reduce debt, maintain or improve inventory turns and reduce costs; | ||
| the operating and financial results of our joint ventures; | ||
| the adequacy of our information technology and business system software; and | ||
| customer, supplier, and competitor consolidation or insolvency. |
Should one or more of these, or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, expected,
believed, estimated, projected or planned. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to
republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or
circumstances after the date hereof.
Page 19 of 29
Table of Contents
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk
During 2004, steel producers were significantly impacted by a shortage of raw materials, rising raw
material prices, increased product demand, producer consolidation and longer lead time
requirements. These conditions resulted in unprecedented cost increases and translated into higher
gross profit dollars and margin percentages. During 2004, we were able to pass producers price
increases and surcharges on to our customers. The base price of carbon flat-rolled steel began
declining in September 2004, continuing into August 2005. This decline reduced our gross profit
margin percentages to levels which are lower than our historical levels. Higher levels of
inventory at steel service centers and end-use customers have caused competitive pressures which
have compressed gross margin percentages during the first nine months of 2005. Based on industry
statistics, service center inventory levels have decreased during the third quarter of 2005, while
producers increased their prices. We believe these conditions will allow margin pressures to
subside during the remainder of 2005.
Approximately 12% of our net sales in the first nine months of 2005 were directly to automotive
manufacturers or manufacturers of automotive components and parts. The automotive industry
experiences significant fluctuations in demand based on numerous factors such as general economic
conditions and consumer confidence. The automotive industry is also subject, from time to time, to
labor work stoppages. The domestic automotive industry, which has experienced a number of
bankruptcies, is involved in significant restructuring. Certain customers in this industry
represent an increasing credit risk.
We are exposed to fluctuating steel prices. We have not entered into any steel commodity hedge
transactions for speculative purposes or otherwise.
Inflation generally affects us by increasing the cost of employee wages and benefits,
transportation services, processing equipment, purchased steel, energy and borrowings under our
credit facility. General inflation has not had a material effect on our financial results during
the past two years; however, we have experienced increased distribution expense as a result of
higher fuel costs. When raw material prices increase, competitive conditions will influence how
much of the steel price increase can be passed on to our customers. When raw material prices
decline, customer demands for lower costed product result in lower selling prices. Declining
Page 20 of 29
Table of Contents
steel prices have generally adversely affected our net sales and net income, while increasing steel
prices favorably affect net sales and net income.
Our primary interest rate risk exposure results from variable rate debt. However, given our
current low level of debt and our expected low levels of debt during the fourth quarter of 2005, we
do not expect to have significant interest rate exposure from variable rate debt during the
remainder of the year.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of September 30, 2005. These disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and
other procedures that were designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports
that are filed with or submitted to the SEC is: (i) accumulated and communicated to management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures; and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in applicable law and regulations. Based on this evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of September 30, 2005, our
disclosure controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the
third quarter of 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect,
our internal control over financial reporting.
Page 21 of 29
Table of Contents
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 31.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |||
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
Page 22 of 29
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereto duly authorized.
OLYMPIC STEEL, INC. (Registrant) |
||||
Date: November 7, 2005 | By: | /s/ Michael D. Siegal | ||
Michael D. Siegal | ||||
Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer | ||||
By: | /s/ Richard T. Marabito | |||
Richard T. Marabito | ||||
Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting Officer) | ||||
Page 23 of 29