OLYMPIC STEEL INC - Quarter Report: 2005 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 | |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2005
|
||
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 0-23320
OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Ohio | 34-1245650 | |||
(State or other jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |||
incorporation or organization) | Identification Number) |
5096 Richmond Road, Bedford Heights, Ohio | 44146 | |||
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrants telephone number, including area code (216) 292-3800
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Exchange Act
Rule 12b-2). Yes þ No o
Indicate the number of shares of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date:
Class | Outstanding as of August 5, 2005 | |||
Common stock, without par value | 10,152,094 |
Page 1 of 37
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Index to Form 10-Q
Page 2 of 37
Table of Contents
Part I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash |
$ | 4,070 | $ | 4,684 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net |
104,940 | 93,336 | ||||||
Inventories |
143,862 | 186,124 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
4,322 | 3,163 | ||||||
Total current assets |
257,194 | 287,307 | ||||||
Property and equipment, at cost |
154,120 | 153,235 | ||||||
Accumulated depreciation |
(73,694 | ) | (69,664 | ) | ||||
Net property and equipment |
80,426 | 83,571 | ||||||
Investments in joint ventures |
2,601 | 2,311 | ||||||
Deferred financing fees, net |
489 | 957 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 340,710 | $ | 374,146 | ||||
Liabilities |
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt |
$ | 4,907 | $ | 4,892 | ||||
Accounts payable |
43,002 | 63,680 | ||||||
Accrued payroll |
6,201 | 16,778 | ||||||
Other accrued liabilities |
7,569 | 10,338 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
61,679 | 95,688 | ||||||
Credit facility revolver |
48,178 | 58,638 | ||||||
Term loans |
26,637 | 29,212 | ||||||
Industrial revenue bonds |
2,908 | 3,280 | ||||||
Total long-term debt |
77,723 | 91,130 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes |
10,474 | 10,803 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
149,876 | 197,621 | ||||||
Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Preferred stock |
| | ||||||
Common stock |
104,939 | 103,252 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
85,895 | 73,273 | ||||||
Total shareholders equity |
190,834 | 176,525 | ||||||
Total liabilities and shareholders equity |
$ | 340,710 | $ | 374,146 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.
Page 3 of 37
Table of Contents
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except per share and tonnage data)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(unaudited) | (unaudited) | |||||||||||||||
Tons sold |
||||||||||||||||
Direct |
270,628 | 292,973 | 584,516 | 623,068 | ||||||||||||
Toll |
48,018 | 51,096 | 93,983 | 106,145 | ||||||||||||
318,646 | 344,069 | 678,499 | 729,213 | |||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 241,482 | $ | 222,773 | $ | 526,040 | $ | 409,806 | ||||||||
Cost of materials sold, exclusive of depreciation |
205,483 | 152,247 | 440,618 | 285,793 | ||||||||||||
Gross profit |
35,999 | 70,526 | 85,422 | 124,013 | ||||||||||||
Operating expenses
|
||||||||||||||||
Warehouse and processing |
10,064 | 11,425 | 20,692 | 22,309 | ||||||||||||
Administrative and general |
7,044 | 13,360 | 16,317 | 23,037 | ||||||||||||
Distribution |
5,024 | 4,711 | 10,159 | 9,782 | ||||||||||||
Selling |
4,761 | 5,764 | 8,798 | 11,080 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy |
1,139 | 1,256 | 2,638 | 2,589 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation |
2,030 | 2,076 | 4,048 | 4,147 | ||||||||||||
Asset impairment charge |
| 187 | | 487 | ||||||||||||
Total operating expenses |
30,062 | 38,779 | 62,652 | 73,431 | ||||||||||||
Operating income |
5,937 | 31,747 | 22,770 | 50,582 | ||||||||||||
Income from joint ventures |
200 | 94 | 443 | 172 | ||||||||||||
Income before financing costs and income taxes |
6,137 | 31,841 | 23,213 | 50,754 | ||||||||||||
Interest and other expense on debt |
1,380 | 1,027 | 2,688 | 2,445 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
4,757 | 30,814 | 20,525 | 48,309 | ||||||||||||
Income tax provision |
1,753 | 12,314 | 7,902 | 18,962 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,004 | $ | 18,500 | $ | 12,623 | $ | 29,347 | ||||||||
Earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income per share basic |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 3.01 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding basic |
10,148 | 9,794 | 10,114 | 9,734 | ||||||||||||
Net income per share diluted |
$ | 0.29 | $ | 1.82 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 2.90 | ||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding diluted |
10,436 | 10,182 | 10,447 | 10,108 | ||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 4 of 37
Table of Contents
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
For the Six Months Ended June 30,
(in thousands)
2005 | 2004 | |||||||
(unaudited) | ||||||||
Cash flows from (used for) operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 12,623 | $ | 29,347 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash from
operating activities - |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
4,515 | 4,910 | ||||||
Income from joint ventures, net of distributions |
(290 | ) | (172 | ) | ||||
Asset impairment charge |
| 487 | ||||||
Loss on disposition of property and equipment |
3 | 28 | ||||||
Long-term deferred income taxes |
(329 | ) | 7,980 | |||||
16,522 | 42,580 | |||||||
Changes in working capital: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(11,604 | ) | (41,110 | ) | ||||
Inventories |
42,262 | (39,735 | ) | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other |
(1,159 | ) | 1,194 | |||||
Accounts payable |
(20,678 | ) | 28,966 | |||||
Accrued payroll and other |
(12,700 | ) | 18,429 | |||||
(3,879 | ) | (32,256 | ) | |||||
Net cash from operating activities |
12,643 | 10,324 | ||||||
Cash flows from (used for) investing activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(906 | ) | (1,065 | ) | ||||
Net proceeds from disposition of property and
equipment |
| 3 | ||||||
Net cash used for investing activities |
(906 | ) | (1,062 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from (used for) financing activities: |
||||||||
Credit facility revolver repayments, net |
(10,460 | ) | (4,495 | ) | ||||
Scheduled repayments of long-term debt |
(2,932 | ) | (2,915 | ) | ||||
Credit facility fees and expenses |
| (318 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options and employee
stock purchases |
1,041 | 1,049 | ||||||
Net cash used for financing activities |
(12,351 | ) | (6,679 | ) | ||||
Cash: |
||||||||
Net change |
(614 | ) | 2,583 | |||||
Beginning balance |
4,684 | 3,087 | ||||||
Ending balance |
$ | 4,070 | $ | 5,670 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.
Page 5 of 37
Table of Contents
Olympic Steel, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2005
(1) Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared from the financial records of
Olympic Steel, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively Olympic or the
Company), without audit and reflect all normal and recurring adjustments which are, in the opinion
of management, necessary to fairly present the results of the interim periods covered by this
report. Year-to-date results are not necessarily indicative of 2005 annual results and these
financial statements should be read in conjunction with the Companys 2004 Annual Report on Form
10-K. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation. Investments in the Companys joint ventures are accounted for under the equity
method.
(2) Accounts Receivable:
The Company maintained allowances for doubtful accounts and unissued credits of $4.1 million and
$4.3 million at June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The allowance for doubtful
accounts is maintained at a level considered appropriate based on historical experience and
specific customer collection issues that have been identified. Estimations are based upon a
calculated percentage of accounts receivable, which remains fairly level from year to year, and
judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers, which can
fluctuate significantly from year to year. The Company cannot guarantee that the rate of future
credit losses will be similar to past experience. The Company considers all available information
when assessing each quarter the adequacy of its allowance for doubtful accounts.
Page 6 of 37
Table of Contents
(3) Inventories:
Steel inventories consist of the following:
(in thousands) | June 30, 2005 | December 31, 2004 | ||||||
Unprocessed |
$ | 109,648 | $ | 141,578 | ||||
Processed and finished |
34,214 | 44,546 | ||||||
Totals |
$ | 143,862 | $ | 186,124 | ||||
(4) | Investments in Joint Ventures: |
The Companys two joint ventures are Olympic Laser Processing, LLC (OLP), a company that processes
laser welded steel sheet blanks for the automotive industry, and G.S.P., LLC (GSP), a certified
Minority Business Enterprise company supporting the flat-rolled steel requirements of the
automotive industry. As of June 30, 2005, Olympic guaranteed 50% of OLPs $14.5 million and 49% of
GSPs $4.1 million of outstanding debt on a several basis.
The following table sets forth selected data for the Companys OLP joint venture:
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
Results of Operations: | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 8,731 | $ | 8,067 | $ | 16,871 | $ | 16,275 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
3,300 | 3,221 | 6,770 | 6,374 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
722 | (29 | ) | 1,212 | 180 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | 549 | $ | (192 | ) | $ | 850 | $ | (151 | ) |
The Company records 50% of OLPs net income or loss to its Consolidated Statements of
Operations as Income from Joint Ventures.
Page 7 of 37
Table of Contents
The following table sets forth selected data for the Companys GSP joint venture:
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
Results of Operations: | 2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | ||||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||||
Net sales |
$ | 6,452 | $ | 3,777 | $ | 12,769 | $ | 6,637 | ||||||||
Gross profit |
326 | 800 | 1,018 | 1,261 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(100 | ) | 404 | 140 | 533 | |||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (152 | ) | $ | 387 | $ | 37 | $ | 504 |
The Company records 49% of GSPs net income or loss to its Consolidated Statements of
Operations as Income from Joint Ventures.
(5) Debt:
The Companys secured bank-financing agreement (the Credit Facility) is comprised of a revolver and
two term loan components. The Credit Facility is collateralized by the Companys accounts
receivable, inventories, and substantially all of the property and equipment. Revolver borrowings
are limited to the lesser of a borrowing base, comprised of eligible receivables and inventories,
or $110 million in the aggregate. In June 2005, the Company entered into an amendment of the Credit
Facility which: (i) extended the maturity date of the existing Credit Facility from December 15,
2006 to December 15, 2008; and (ii) added a $25 million accordion feature to the revolver portion
of the Credit Facility which allows the Company to add up to $25 million of availability at a
future date. The Company has the option to borrow based on the agents base rate or Eurodollar
Rates (EURO) plus a premium.
In December 2002, the Company incurred $2.2 million of closing fees and expenses in connection with
the origination of this Credit Facility and also incurred $1 million of subsequent bank amendment
and waiver fees, all of which have been capitalized and included in Deferred Financing Fees, Net
on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These fees and expenses are being amortized to
Interest and Other Expense on Debt.
Page 8 of 37
Table of Contents
The Companys effective borrowing rate, inclusive of deferred financing fees, for the first six
months of 2005 was 5.6% compared to 5.8% for the comparable period in 2004.
The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with various covenants, the most significant of
which include: (i) minimum availability of $10 million, tested monthly, (ii) a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.25, and a maximum leverage ratio of 1.75, which are tested quarterly, (iii)
restrictions on additional indebtedness, and (iv) limitations on capital expenditures. At June 30,
2005, the Company had $61.0 million of availability under its Credit Facility and was in compliance
with its covenants.
Included in the Credit Facility revolver balances on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets
are $8.6 million and $9.1 million of checks issued by the Company that have not cleared the bank as
of June 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
(6) Discontinued Operations:
In 2002, the Company closed its unprofitable tube processing operation (Tubing) in Cleveland, Ohio.
In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS No. 144), Accounting
for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Tubing was accounted for as a discontinued
operation and its assets were written down to their estimated fair value less costs to sell. The
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations reflects a $487 thousand asset impairment charge
in 2004 which reduced the carrying value of the assets held for sale to its then estimated fair
value of $150 thousand. The assets were sold in the third quarter of 2004 for $150 thousand.
Page 9 of 37
Table of Contents
(7) Shares Outstanding and Earnings Per Share:
Earnings per share have been calculated based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding
as set forth below:
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Weighted average shares outstanding |
10,148 | 9,794 | 10,114 | 9,734 | ||||||||||||
Assumed exercise of stock options |
288 | 388 | 333 | 374 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average diluted shares |
10,436 | 10,182 | 10,447 | 10,108 | ||||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 3,004 | $ | 18,500 | $ | 12,623 | $ | 29,347 | ||||||||
Basic earnings per share |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 3.01 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share |
$ | 0.29 | $ | 1.82 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 2.90 | ||||||||
(8) Stock Options:
At June 30, 2005, stock options to purchase 756,512 shares were outstanding, of which 637,179 were
exercisable at prices ranging from $1.97 to $15.50 per share, none of which were anti-dilutive.
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (SFAS No. 123), Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation, encourages, but does not require, companies to record compensation cost for
stock-based employee compensation plans at fair value. The Company has chosen to continue to
account for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting
Principles Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related
Interpretations. Accordingly, compensation cost for stock options is measured as the excess, if
any, of the quoted market price of the Companys stock at the date of the grant over the amount an
employee must pay to acquire the stock.
Page 10 of 37
Table of Contents
If the Company had elected to recognize compensation cost based on the fair value of the options
granted at the grant date under SFAS No. 123, net income and earnings per share would have been
reduced by the amounts shown below:
For the Three Months | For the Six Months | |||||||||||||||
Ended June 30, | Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2005 | 2004 | 2005 | 2004 | |||||||||||||
(in thousands, except per share data) | ||||||||||||||||
Net income, as reported |
$ | 3,004 | $ | 18,500 | $ | 12,623 | $ | 29,347 | ||||||||
Pro forma expense, net of tax |
(264 | ) | (658 | ) | (346 | ) | (725 | ) | ||||||||
Pro forma net income |
$ | 2,740 | $ | 17,842 | $ | 12,277 | $ | 28,622 | ||||||||
Basic net income per share: |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.30 | $ | 1.89 | $ | 1.25 | $ | 3.01 | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.27 | $ | 1.83 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 2.94 | ||||||||
Diluted earnings per share: |
||||||||||||||||
As reported |
$ | 0.29 | $ | 1.82 | $ | 1.21 | $ | 2.90 | ||||||||
Pro forma |
$ | 0.26 | $ | 1.75 | $ | 1.18 | $ | 2.83 | ||||||||
(9) Supplemental Cash Flow Information:
Interest paid during the first six months of 2005 and 2004 totaled $2.1 million and $2.0 million,
respectively. Taxes paid during the first six months of 2005 and 2004 totaled $10.0 million and
$4.2 million, respectively.
Page 11 of 37
Table of Contents
(10) Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements:
In November 2004, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards No. 151 (SFAS No. 151), Inventory Costs an amendment of ARB No. 43, Chapter
4 which clarifies that abnormal amounts of idle facility expenses, freight, handling costs and
wasted materials (spoilage) should be recognized as current period charges. In addition, SFAS No.
151 requires that allocation of fixed production overheads to the costs of conversion be based on
the normal capacity of the production facilities. The provisions of SFAS No. 151 are effective for
inventory costs incurred during fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2005. The adoption of SFAS
No. 151 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial statements.
In December 2004, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123-R (SFAS No.
123-R). SFAS No. 123-R establishes standards for accounting for transactions in which an entity
exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services. It also addresses transactions in which an
entity incurs liabilities in exchange for goods or services that are based on the fair value of the
entitys equity instruments or that may be settled by the issuance of those securities. SFAS No.
123-R also requires an entity to recognize the cost of employee services received in share-based
payment transactions, thereby reflecting the economic consequences of those transactions in the
financial statements. SFAS No. 123-R applies to all awards granted on or after July 1, 2005, and
to awards modified, vested, repurchased, or canceled after that date. In April 2005, the FASB
delayed the effective date of SFAS No. 123-R, so that it applies to our annual period beginning on
January 1, 2006. Due to the relatively few number of stock options vesting after the effective
date, SFAS No. 123-R is not expected to have a significant impact on our financial statements.
Page 12 of 37
Table of Contents
Item 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The following discussion and analysis of our financial conditions and results are based upon the
consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial
statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the
financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates under different assumptions
or conditions. On an ongoing basis, we monitor and evaluate our estimates and assumptions.
For further information regarding the accounting policies that we believe to be critical accounting
policies and that affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparing our
consolidated financials statements, see our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended
December 31, 2004.
Overview
Our results of operations are affected by numerous external factors, such as general and global
business, economic and political conditions, competition, steel pricing and availability, energy
prices, pricing and availability of raw materials used in the production of steel, customer demand
for steel and their ability to manage their credit line availability and layoffs or work stoppages
by our own, our suppliers or our customers personnel.
We sell a broad range of products, many of which have different gross profits and margins.
Products that have more value-added processing generally have a greater gross profit and higher
margins. Accordingly, our overall gross profit is affected by, among other things, product mix,
the amount of processing performed, the availability of steel, volatility in selling prices and
material purchase costs. We also perform toll processing of customer-owned steel, the majority of
which is performed in our Detroit and Georgia operations.
Our two joint ventures are Olympic Laser Processing, LLC (OLP), a company that processes laser
welded sheet steel blanks for the automotive industry, and G.S.P., LLC (GSP), a certified Minority
Business Enterprise company supporting the flat-rolled steel requirements of the
Page 13 of 37
Table of Contents
automotive industry. Our 50% interest in OLP and 49% interest in GSP are accounted for under the
equity method.
Financing costs include interest expense on debt and deferred financing and bank amendment fees
amortized to expense.
We sell certain products internationally. All international sales and payments are made in United
States dollars. Recent international sales have been immaterial to our consolidated financial
results.
In 2002, we closed our unprofitable tube processing operation (Tubing) in Cleveland, Ohio. In
accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS No. 144), Accounting for
the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets, Tubing was accounted for as a discontinued
operation and its assets were written down to their estimated fair value less costs to sell. The
accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations reflects a $487 thousand asset impairment charge
which reduced the carrying value of the assets held for sale to its then estimated fair value of
$150 thousand. The assets were sold in the third quarter of 2004 for $150 thousand.
We have four collective bargaining agreements covering approximately 185 employees at our
Minneapolis and Detroit facilities. A collective bargaining agreement for employees at our
Minneapolis coil facility expires on September 30, 2005 and agreements covering other Detroit and
Minneapolis employees expire in 2006 and subsequent years. We have never experienced a work
stoppage and we believe that our relationship with our employees is good. However, any prolonged
work stoppages by our personnel represented by collective bargaining units could have a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
Results of Operations
Tons sold decreased 7.4% to 319 thousand in the second quarter of 2005 from 344 thousand in the
second quarter of 2004. Tons sold in the second quarter of 2005 included 271 thousand from direct
sales and 48 thousand from toll processing, compared with 293 thousand direct tons and 51 thousand
toll tons in the comparable period of last year. Tons sold in the first six months of 2005
decreased 7.0% to 679 thousand from 729 thousand last year. Tons sold in the first six
Page 14 of 37
Table of Contents
months included 585 thousand from direct sales and 94 thousand from toll processing, compared with
623 thousand direct tons and 106 thousand toll tons in the comparable period of last year. The
decreases in tons sold for the 2005 periods were primarily attributable to reduced sales to
automotive customers, reduced sales to other service centers and lower overall demand across most
sectors in 2005 when compared to 2004. We expect third quarter tons sold to be less than second
quarter tons sold due to normal seasonal closings and production declines of certain automotive and
manufacturing customers.
Net sales increased 8.4% to $241.5 million in the second quarter of 2005 from $222.8 million in the
second quarter of 2004. For the first six months of 2005, net sales increased 28.4% to $526.0
million from $409.8 million. Average selling prices for the second quarter of 2005 increased 17.1%
from last years second quarter, but decreased 4.2% from the first quarter of 2005. Higher levels
of inventory held by steel service centers and end-use customers have led to competitive pressures
and have reduced selling prices during the second quarter of 2005. We expect competitive pressures
on selling price to continue in the third quarter of 2005.
As a percentage of net sales, gross profit (exclusive of depreciation) decreased to 14.9% in the
second quarter of 2005 from 31.7% in the second quarter of 2004. For the first six months of 2005,
gross profit decreased to 16.2% from 30.3% in the comparable 2004 period. As the base price of
steel declined, competitive pressures resulted in lower current selling prices and gross margin
percentages during the first six months of 2005. We expect gross margin levels in the third
quarter of 2005 to be comparable to the second quarter of 2005.
Operating expenses in the second quarter of 2005 decreased 22.5% to $30.1 million from $38.8
million in last years second quarter. For the first six months of 2005, operating expenses
decreased 14.7% to $62.7 million from $73.4 million in the comparable 2004 period. The decrease in
operating expenses is primarily the result of lower variable compensation for the first six months
of 2005. As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses decreased to 12.4% for the second
quarter of 2005 from 17.4% in the comparable 2004 period. For the first six months of 2005,
operating expenses decreased to 11.9% of net sales from 17.9% in the last years comparable period.
Our 2005 second quarter results included an after-tax bad debt charge of $1.1 million, or $.10 per
diluted share, related to receivables from two customers that filed for bankruptcy protection in
June 2005.
Page 15 of 37
Table of Contents
Income from joint ventures totaled $200 thousand in the second quarter of 2005, compared to $94
thousand in the second quarter of 2004. For the first six months of 2005, income from joint
ventures totaled $443 thousand compared to $172 thousand in 2004.
Financing costs totaled $1.4 million for the second quarter of 2005 compared to $1.0 million for
the second quarter of 2004. For the first six months of 2005, financing costs increased to $2.7
million from $2.4 million in 2004. Our effective borrowing rate, inclusive of deferred financing
fees, for the first six months of 2005 was 5.6% compared to 5.8% in 2004. We have the option to
borrow based on the agent banks base rate or Eurodollar Rate (EURO) plus a premium. We expect
market interest rates to increase during the remainder of 2005.
For the second quarter of 2005, income before income taxes totaled $4.8 million compared to $30.8
million in the second quarter of 2004. An income tax provision of 36.9% was recorded for the
second quarter of 2005, compared to a provision of 40% for the second quarter of 2004. For the
first six months of 2005, we reported income before taxes of $20.5 million compared to $48.3
million for the first six months of 2004. An income tax provision of 38.5% was recorded during the
first six months of 2005 compared to a 39.3% provision recorded during the comparable 2004 period.
The effective tax rate decreased in 2005 due to our estimated benefit of the manufacturing
deduction provided by The American Jobs Creation Act of 2004. We expect the effective tax rate to
approximate 38.5% for the remainder of 2005. Taxes paid totaled $7.8 million and $4.1 million for
the second quarter of 2005 and 2004, respectively. Taxes paid during the first six months of 2005
totaled $10.0 million compared to $4.1 million for the comparable 2004 period. Taxes paid in 2005
are higher than 2004 as substantially all net operating loss carryforwards were utilized during the
first six months of 2004.
Net income for the second quarter of 2005 totaled $3.0 million or $.29 per diluted share, compared
to net income of $18.5 million or $1.82 per diluted share for the second quarter of 2004. Net
income for the first six months of 2005 totaled $12.6 million or $1.21 per diluted share, compared
to $29.3 million or $2.90 per diluted share in the first six months of 2004.
Page 16 of 37
Table of Contents
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our principal capital requirements include funding working capital needs, purchasing and upgrading
processing equipment and facilities, and investing in joint ventures. We use cash generated from
operations, leasing transactions, and our credit facility to fund these requirements.
Working capital at June 30, 2005 increased $3.9 million from the end of the prior year.
Significant working capital changes included a $42.3 million decrease in inventories from December
31, 2004, a $11.6 million increase in accounts receivable, and decreases of $20.7 million in
accounts payable and $13.3 million in accrued payroll and accrued liabilities.
Net cash from operating activities totaled $12.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2005.
Cash generated from earnings before non-cash items totaled $16.5 million, while cash used for
working capital components totaled $3.9 million. Decreases in steel pricing and the reduction in
our inventory levels have resulted in significant decreases in inventories and accounts payable.
We expect working capital levels to further decline during the third quarter of 2005, as lower
pricing will result in further reductions of accounts receivable, inventories and accounts payable.
During the first six months of 2005, net cash used for investing activities totaled $0.9 million,
which consisted of capital spending. We do not expect to make significant capital expenditures
during the remainder of the year. We anticipate adding new laser processing equipment during the
remainder of 2005, which we expect will be financed through operating leases.
Net cash used for financing activities during the first six months of 2005 totaled $12.4 million
and primarily consisted of scheduled principal repayments under our debt agreements and reduced
borrowings under our revolving credit line, offset by proceeds from the exercise of stock options.
We expect our total borrowings to further decline during the third quarter of 2005.
Our secured bank-financing agreement (the Credit Facility) is comprised of a revolver and two term
loan components. The Credit Facility is collateralized by our accounts receivable, inventories,
and substantially all of our property and equipment. Revolver borrowings are limited to the lesser
of a borrowing base, comprised of eligible receivables and inventories, or $110 million in the
aggregate. In June 2005, we entered into an amendment of the Credit Facility which: (i) extended
the maturity of the existing Credit Facility from December 15, 2006 to
Page 17 of 37
Table of Contents
December 15, 2008; and (ii) added a $25 million accordion feature to the revolver portion of the
Credit Facility which allows us to add up to $25 million of availability at a future date.
In December 2002, we incurred $2.2 million of closing fees and expenses in connection with the
origination of the Credit Facility and also incurred $1 million of subsequent bank amendment and
waiver fees, all of which have been capitalized and included in Deferred Financing Fees, Net on
the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. These fees and expenses are being amortized to
interest and other expense on debt. Monthly principal payments of $367 thousand commenced on
February 1, 2003 for the term loan components of the Credit Facility.
The Credit Facility requires us to comply with various covenants, the most significant of which
include: (i) minimum availability of $10 million, tested monthly, (ii) a minimum fixed charge
coverage ratio of 1.25, and a maximum leverage ratio of 1.75, which are tested quarterly, (iii)
restrictions on additional indebtedness, and (iv) limitations on capital expenditures. At June 30,
2005, we had $61.0 million of availability under our Credit Facility and we were in compliance with
our covenants.
We believe that funds available under our Credit Facility, together with funds generated from
operations, will be sufficient to provide us with the liquidity necessary to fund anticipated
working capital requirements, capital expenditure requirements, and scheduled debt maturities over
the next 12 months. Capital requirements are subject to change as business conditions warrant and
opportunities arise.
Page 18 of 37
Table of Contents
Forward-Looking Information
This document contains various forward-looking statements and information that are based on
managements beliefs as well as assumptions made by and information currently available to
management. When used in this documents, the words anticipate, expect, believe, estimate,
project, plan and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements,
which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform
Act of 1995. Such statements are subject to certain risks, uncertainties and assumptions
including, but not limited to:
| general and global business, economic and political conditions; | ||
| competitive factors such as availability and pricing of steel, industry inventory levels and rapid fluctuations in customer demand and pricing; | ||
| the cyclicality and volatility within the steel industry; | ||
| the ability of customers (especially in the automotive industry) to maintain their credit availability; | ||
| layoffs or work stoppages by our own or our suppliers or customers personnel; | ||
| equipment malfunctions or installation delays; | ||
| the successes of our strategic efforts and initiatives to increase sales volumes, improve cash flows and reduce debt, maintain or improve inventory turns and reduce costs; | ||
| the successes of our joint ventures; | ||
| the adequacy of our information technology and business system software; and | ||
| customer, supplier, and competitor consolidation or insolvency. |
Should one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying
assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, expected,
believed, estimated, projected or planned. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these
forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to
republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or
circumstances after the date hereof.
Page 19 of 37
Table of Contents
Item 3. Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosure About Market Risk
During 2004, steel producers were significantly impacted by a shortage of raw materials, rising raw
material prices, increased product demand, producer consolidation and longer lead time
requirements. These conditions resulted in unprecedented cost increases and translated into higher
gross profit dollars and margin percentages. During 2004, we were able to pass producers price
increases and surcharges on to our customers. The base price of carbon flat-rolled steel has been
declining since September 2004. This decline has reduced our gross profit margin percentages to
levels which are lower than our historical levels. Higher levels of inventory at steel service
centers and end-use customers have caused competitive pressures which have compressed gross margin
percentages in the first half of 2005. Based on industry statistics, there was a meaningful
decrease in service center inventory levels in June 2005. We believe that the continuation of this
inventory correction may allow margin pressures to subside by later this year.
Approximately 12% of our net sales in the first half of 2005 were directly to automotive
manufacturers or manufacturers of automotive components and parts. The automotive industry
experiences significant fluctuations in demand based on numerous factors such as general economic
conditions and consumer confidence. The automotive industry is also subject, from time to time, to
labor work stoppages. Certain customers in this industry also represent an increasing credit risk.
We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and fluctuating steel prices. We have not
entered into any interest rate or steel commodity hedge transactions for speculative purposes or
otherwise.
Inflation generally affects us by increasing the cost of employee wages and benefits,
transportation services, processing equipment, purchased steel, energy and borrowings under our
credit facility. General inflation has not had a material effect on our financial results during
the past two years. When raw material prices increase, competitive conditions will influence how
much of the steel price increase can be passed on to our customers. When raw material prices
decline, customer demands for lower costed product result in lower selling prices. Declining steel
prices have generally adversely affected our net sales and net income, while increasing steel
prices favorably affect net sales and net income.
Page 20 of 37
Table of Contents
Our primary interest rate risk exposure results from variable rate debt. If interest rates in the
future were to increase 100 basis points (1.0%) from June 30, 2005 rates, and assuming no changes
in total debt from June 30, 2005 levels, the additional annual interest expense to us would be
approximately $792 thousand. We currently do not hedge our exposure to variable interest rate
risk. However, we have the option to enter into 30 to 180 day fixed base rate EURO loans under the
credit facility.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
We have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operations of our disclosure controls and
procedures as of June 30, 2005. These disclosure controls and procedures are the controls and
other procedures that were designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in reports
that are filed with or submitted to the SEC is: (i) accumulated and communicated to management,
including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosures; and (ii) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the
time periods specified in applicable law and regulations. Based on this evaluation, the Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of June 30, 2005, our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective.
There were no changes in our internal controls over financial reporting that occurred during the
second quarter of 2005 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Page 21 of 37
Table of Contents
Part II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
The Companys annual meeting of shareholders was held on April 28, 2005.
At the annual meeting, the Companys shareholders elected Michael D. Siegal, Thomas
M. Forman and James B. Meathe as Directors for a two-year term, which expires at the
annual meeting of shareholders in 2007.
The following tabulation represents voting for the Directors:
For | Against | |||||||
Michael D. Siegal |
8,247,561 | 67,981 | ||||||
Thomas M. Forman |
8,106,512 | 209,030 | ||||||
James B. Meathe |
8,175,361 | 140,181 |
Item 5. Other Items
On August 5, 2005, the Company entered into Management Retention Agreements (the
Agreements) in substantially the same form as included in Exhibit 10.16, with
Richard A. Manson, Treasurer & Corporate Controller, and Heber MacWilliams, Chief
Information Officer. Under the Agreements which do not become operative unless
there is a Change-in-Control of the Company (as defined in the Agreements), the
Company agrees to continue the employment of the Officer for one year following the
Change-in-Control in the same position with the same duties and responsibilities and
at the same compensation level as existed prior to the Change-in-Control. If during
the one year period following the Change-in-Control, the Officers employment is
terminated without cause, or the Officer terminates his employment for good
reason, the Officer shall receive a lump-sum severance payment equal to one times
the average of his last three years compensation. The Agreement also includes a
one-year non-competition prohibition.
Page 22 of 37
Table of Contents
Item 6. Exhibits
Exhibit 10.16 Form of Management Retention Agreement for Richard A. Manson and
Heber MacWilliams.
Exhibit 31.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 31.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section
302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.1 Certification of the Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Exhibit 32.2 Certification of the Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
Page 23 of 37
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereto duly authorized.
OLYMPIC STEEL, INC. | ||||||
(Registrant) | ||||||
Date: August 5, 2005
|
By: | /s/ Michael D. Siegal | ||||
Michael D. Siegal | ||||||
Chairman of the Board and Chief | ||||||
Executive Officer | ||||||
By: | /s/ Richard T. Marabito | |||||
Richard T. Marabito | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer | ||||||
(Principal Accounting Officer) |
Page 24 of 37