OLYMPIC STEEL INC - Annual Report: 2007 (Form 10-K)

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

Form 10-K

 

 

Commission File Number 0-23320

OLYMPIC STEEL, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code (216) 292-3800

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

None

 

Indicated by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes o  No þ

 

Indicated by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act. Yes o  No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ  No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o  No þ

 

As of June 30, 2007, the aggregate market value of voting stock held by nonaffiliates of the registrant based on the closing price at which such stock was sold on the Nasdaq Global Market on such date approximated $255,068,383. The number of shares of Common Stock outstanding as of March 14, 2008 was 10,845,077.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

The registrant intends to file with the Securities and Exchange Commission a definitive Proxy Statement pursuant to Regulation 14A of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 within 120 days of the close of its fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, portions of which document shall be deemed to be incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K from the date such document is filed.

 

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

 

 

We are a leading U.S. steel service center with over 53 years of experience. Our primary focus is on the direct sale and distribution of large volumes of processed carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate steel products. We operate as an intermediary between steel producers and manufacturers that require processed steel for their operations. We provide services and functions that form an integral component of our customers’ supply chain management, reducing inventory levels and increasing efficiency, thereby lowering their overall cost of production. Our processing services include both traditional service center processes of cutting-to-length, slitting, and shearing and higher value-added processes of blanking, tempering, plate burning, precision machining, welding, fabrication and painting of steel parts.

 

We operate as a single business segment with 15 strategically-located processing and distribution facilities in Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania. This broad geographic footprint allows us to focus on regional customers and larger national and multi-location accounts, primarily located throughout the midwestern, eastern and southern United States. In June 2006, we acquired Tinsley Group-PS&W, Inc. (PS&W), a full service fabricating company, which operates two plants in North Carolina that utilizes boring, forming, machining, welding, and painting equipment to produce a wide variety of fabrications for large original equipment manufacturers of heavy construction equipment. During 2006, we closed the Olympic Laser Processing (OLP) joint venture near Detroit, Michigan, and OLP liquidated its assets, other than real estate. In May 2006, we acquired the remaining 51% interest in G.S.P., LLC (“GSP”), a venture in the Detroit area that primarily serviced the automotive market, and we subsequently sold all of GSP’s assets in December 2007, ceasing its operations.

 

We are incorporated under the laws of the State of Ohio. Our executive offices are located at 5096 Richmond Road, Cleveland, Ohio 44146. Our telephone number is (216) 292-3800, and our website address is www.olysteel.com.

 

Industry Overview

 

The steel industry is comprised of three types of entities: steel producers, intermediate steel processors and steel service centers. Steel producers have historically emphasized the sale of steel to volume purchasers and have generally viewed intermediate steel processors and steel service centers as part of their customer base. However, all three types of entities can compete for certain customers who purchase large quantities of steel. Intermediate steel processors tend to serve as processors in large quantities for steel producers and major industrial consumers of processed steel, including automobile and appliance manufacturers.

 

Services provided by steel service centers can range from storage and distribution of unprocessed metal products to complex, precision value-added steel processing. Steel service centers respond directly to customer needs and emphasize value-added processing of steel pursuant to specific customer demands, such as cutting-to-length, slitting, shearing, roll forming, shape correction and surface improvement, blanking, tempering, plate burning and stamping. These processes produce steel to specified lengths, widths, shapes and surface characteristics through the use of specialized equipment. Steel service centers typically have lower cost structures than, and provide services and value-added processing not otherwise available from, steel producers.

 

End product manufacturers and other steel users have increasingly sought to purchase steel on shorter lead times and with more frequent and reliable deliveries than can normally be provided by steel producers. Steel service centers generally have lower labor costs than steel producers and consequently process steel on a more cost-effective basis. In addition, due to this lower cost structure, steel service centers are able to handle orders in quantities smaller than would be economical for steel producers. The benefits to customers purchasing products from steel service centers include lower inventory levels, lower overall cost of raw materials, more timely response and decreased manufacturing time and expense. Customers also benefit from a lower investment in buildings and equipment, which allows them to focus on the engineering and marketing of their products. We believe that the

increasing prevalence of just-in-time delivery requirements has made the value-added inventory, processing and delivery functions performed by steel service centers increasingly important.

 

Corporate History

 

Our company was founded in 1954 by the Siegal family as a general steel service center. Michael Siegal, the son of one of the founders, began his career with us in the early 1970s and has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 1984, and as our Chairman of the Board of Directors since 1994. David Wolfort, our President and Chief Operating Officer, joined us as General Manager in 1984. In the late 1980s, our business strategy changed from a focus on warehousing and distributing steel from a single facility with no major processing equipment to a focus on growth, geographic and customer diversity and value-added processing. An integral part of our growth has been the acquisition and start-up of several processing and sales operations, and the investment in processing equipment. In 1994, we completed an initial public offering and, in 1996, we completed a follow-on offering of our common stock.

 

Business Strategy and Objectives

 

We believe that the steel service center and processing industry is driven by four primary trends: (i) increased outsourcing of manufacturing processes by domestic original equipment manufacturers; (ii) shift by customers to fewer and larger suppliers; (iii) increased customer demand for higher quality products and services; and (iv) consolidation and globalization of steel industry participants.

 

In recognition of these industry dynamics, our focus has been on achieving profitable growth through the start-up, acquisition, and participation in service centers, processors, fabricators and related businesses, and investments in higher value-added processing equipment and services, while continuing our commitment to expanding and improving our sales and servicing efforts.

 

We have focused on specific operating objectives including: (i) investing in value-added and automation equipment; (ii) controlling operating expenses in relation to sales and gross margins; (iii) maintaining inventory turnover at approximately five times per year; (iv) maintaining targeted cash turnover rates; (v) investing in business information systems; (vi) improving safety awareness; and (vii) improving on-time delivery and quality performance for our customers.

 

These operating objectives are supported by:

 

 

We believe our depth of management, facilities, locations, processing capabilities, focus on safety, quality and customer service, extensive and experienced sales force, and the strength of our customer and supplier relationships provide a strong foundation for implementation of our strategy and achievement of our objectives. Certain elements of our strategy are set forth in more detail below.

 

Investment In Value-Added Processing Equipment.  We have invested in processing and automation equipment to support customer demand and to respond to the growing trend among capital equipment manufacturers (our customers) to outsource non-core production processes, such as plate processing, machining, welding, and fabrication, and to concentrate on engineering, design and assembly. When the results of sales and marketing efforts indicate that there is sufficient customer demand for a particular product or service, we will purchase equipment to satisfy that demand. We also evaluate our existing equipment to ensure that it remains productive, and we upgrade, replace, redeploy or dispose of equipment when necessary.

Investments in automated welding lines, paint lines, precision machining equipment, blankers, plate processing equipment and two customized temper mills with heavy gauge cut-to-length capabilities have allowed us to further increase our higher value-added processing services. In 2007, we expanded our Iowa facility by approximately 54,000 square feet in order to meet our customers’ need for high quality sheet product. We also installed additional laser and plasma cutting equipment and machining centers in Cleveland, Chicago, Chambersburg, Georgia and PS&W to support our growing value-added services. During 2006, we added six laser processing lines at various locations and we added 150,000 square feet to our Chambersburg fabrication business. As part of our continuous evaluation of non-productive equipment, new equipment has often replaced multiple pieces of older, less efficient equipment.

 

Sales And Marketing.  We believe that our commitment to quality, service, just-in-time delivery and field sales personnel has enabled us to build and maintain strong customer relationships. We continuously analyze our customer base to ensure that strategic customers are properly targeted and serviced, while focusing our efforts to supply and service our larger customers on a national account basis, where we successfully service multi-location customers from multi-location Olympic facilities. In addition, we offer business solutions to our customers through value-added and value-engineered services. We also provide inventory stocking programs and in-plant employees located at certain customer locations to help reduce customers’ costs. During 2007, we expanded our owned truck fleet to further enhance our just-in-time deliveries based on our customers’ requirements.

 

Our Fe program is a commitment to provide superior customer service while striving to exceed customer expectations. This program includes tracking actual on-time delivery and quality performance against objectives, and recognition of initiatives to improve efficiencies and streamline processes at each operation.

 

We believe our sales force is among the largest and most experienced in the industry. The sales force makes direct daily sales calls to customers throughout the continental United States. The continuous interaction between our sales force and active and prospective customers provides us with valuable market information and sales opportunities, including opportunities for outsourcing, improving customer service and increased sales.

 

Our sales efforts are further supported by metallurgical engineers, technical service personnel and product specialists who have specific expertise in carbon and stainless steel, alloy plate and steel fabrication. Our e-commerce initiatives include extranet pages for specific customers and are integrated with our internal business systems to provide cost efficiencies for both us and our customers.

 

Acquisitions.  In June 2006, we acquired PS&W to further expand our fabrication capabilities. We believe the service center industry will experience further consolidation, and we will actively consider participation in such consolidation.

 

Management.  We believe one of our strengths is the depth of our management. In addition to our executive officers, members of our senior management team have a diversity of backgrounds within the steel industry, including management positions at steel producers and other steel service centers. They average 25 years of experience in the steel industry and 13 years with our company.

 

Products, Processing Services, and Quality Standards

 

We maintain a substantial inventory of coil and plate steel. Coil is in the form of a continuous sheet, typically 36 to 96 inches wide, between 0.015 and 0.625 inches thick, and rolled into 10 to 30 ton coils. Because of the size and weight of these coils and the equipment required to move and process them into smaller sizes, such coils do not meet the requirements, without further processing, of most customers. Plate is typically thicker than coil and is processed by laser, plasma or oxygen burning.

 

Customer orders are entered or electronically transmitted into computerized order entry systems, and appropriate inventory is then selected and scheduled for processing in accordance with the customer’s specified delivery date. We attempt to maximize yield by combining customer orders for processing each coil or plate to the fullest extent practicable.

 

Our services include both traditional service center processes of cutting-to-length, slitting and shearing and higher value-added processes of blanking, tempering, plate burning, precision machining, welding, fabricating and

painting to process steel to specified lengths, widths and shapes pursuant to specific customer orders. Cutting-to-length involves cutting steel along the width of the coil. Slitting involves cutting steel to specified widths along the length of the coil. Shearing is the process of cutting sheet steel. Blanking cuts the steel into specific shapes with close tolerances. Tempering improves the uniformity of the thickness and flatness of the steel through a cold rolling process. Plate burning is the process of cutting steel into specific shapes and sizes. Our machining activities include drilling, bending, milling, tapping, boring and sawing. Our fabrication activities include additional machining, welding, assembly and painting of component parts.

 

The following table sets forth, as of December 31, 2007, the major pieces of processing equipment by geographic region:

 

 

 

 

Our quality assurance system establishes controls and procedures covering all aspects of our products from the time the material is ordered through receipt, processing and shipment to the customer. These controls and procedures encompass periodic supplier audits, meetings with customers, inspection criteria, traceability and certification. In addition, all of our facilities have earned ISO 9001:2000 certifications. The Detroit operation has earned Ford’s Q-1 quality rating and is also ISO 14001 and TS-16949 certified. We are currently undertaking an initiative to achieve company-wide ISO 14001 certification. We have a quality testing lab adjacent to our temper mill facility in Cleveland.

 

Customers and Distribution

 

We have a diverse customer and geographic base, which helps to reduce the inherent risk and cyclicality of our business. Net sales to our top three customers, in the aggregate, approximated 13% and 21% of our net sales in 2007 and 2006, respectively. We serve customers in most carbon steel consuming industries, including manufacturers and fabricators of transportation and material handling equipment, construction and farm machinery, storage tanks, environmental and energy generation equipment, automobiles, food service and electrical equipment, military vehicles and equipment, as well as general and plate fabricators, and steel service centers. Sales to the three largest U.S. automobile manufacturers and their suppliers, made principally by our Detroit operation, and sales to other steel service centers accounted for approximately 8.5% and 9%, respectively, of our net sales in 2007, and 9% and 8% of our net sales in 2006.

 

While we ship products throughout the United States, most of our customers are located in the midwestern, eastern and southern regions of the United States. Most domestic customers are located within a 250-mile radius of one of our processing facilities, thus enabling an efficient delivery system capable of handling a high frequency of

short lead-time orders. We primarily transport most of our products directly to customers via third-party trucking firms. However, we expanded our owned truck fleet to further enhance our just-in-time deliveries, based on our customers’ requirements. Products sold to foreign customers, which have been immaterial to our consolidated results, are shipped either directly from the steel producers to the customer or to an intermediate processor, and then to the customer by rail, truck or ocean carrier.

 

We process our steel to specific customer orders as well as for stocking programs. Many of our larger customers commit to purchase on a regular basis at agreed upon prices for periods ranging from three to twelve months. To help mitigate price volatility risks, these fixed price commitments are generally matched with corresponding supply arrangements. Customers notify us of specific release dates as the processed products are required. Customers typically notify us of release dates anywhere from a just-in-time basis up to three weeks before the release date. Therefore, we are required to carry sufficient inventory to meet the short lead time and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers.

 

Many of our products are sold to customers in industries that experience significant fluctuations in demand due to economic conditions, energy prices, seasonality, consumer demand and other factors beyond our control. Approximately 8.5% and 9% of our net sales in 2007 and 2006, respectively, were directly to automotive manufacturers or manufacturers of automotive components and parts. Due to the concentration of customers in this industry, our gross margins on these sales are generally less than our margins on sales to other industries. Further pressure by the automotive manufacturers to reduce their costs could result in even lower margins. Any decrease in demand within one or more of the industries we serve, including the current depressed environment in the domestic auto industry, as well as the current slowdown in light construction-related industries, may be significant and may last for a lengthy period of time. Customers in affected industries, particularly the domestic auto industry, also represent an increasing credit and bankruptcy risk, which could cause decreased sales or cause us to recognize additional bad debt expense.

 

Raw Materials

 

Our principal raw material is flat rolled carbon, coated and stainless steel that we typically purchase from multiple primary steel producers. The steel industry as a whole is cyclical and at times pricing and availability of steel can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our control, including general domestic and international economic conditions, labor costs, sales levels, competition, consolidation of steel producers, fluctuations in the costs of raw materials necessary to produce steel, import duties and tariffs and currency exchange rates. This volatility can significantly affect the availability and cost of raw materials for us.

 

Inventory management is a key profitability driver in the steel service center industry. We, like many other steel service centers, maintain substantial inventories of steel to accommodate the short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers. Accordingly, we purchase steel in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon historic buying practices, contracts with customers and market conditions. Our commitments to purchase steel are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders. We have no long-term, fixed-price steel purchase contracts. When steel prices increase, competitive conditions will influence how much of the price increase we can pass on to our customers. When steel prices decline, customer demands for lower prices and our competitors’ responses to those demands could result in lower sale prices and, consequently, lower margins as we use existing steel inventory.

 

Suppliers

 

We concentrate on developing supply relationships with high-quality steel producers, using a coordinated effort to be the customer of choice for business critical suppliers. We employ sourcing strategies maximizing the quality, production and transportation economies of a global supply base. We are an important customer of flat-rolled coil and plate for many of our principal suppliers, but we are not dependent on any one supplier. We purchase in bulk from steel producers in quantities that are efficient for such producers. This enables us to maintain a continued source of supply at what we believe to be competitive prices. We believe the accessibility and proximity of our facilities to major domestic steel producers, combined with our long-standing and continuous prompt pay

practices, will continue to be an important factor in maintaining strong relationships with steel suppliers. We purchase flat-rolled steel at regular intervals from a number of domestic and foreign producers of primary steel.

 

Recently, the steel producing supply base has experienced significant consolidation with the three largest domestic producers, ArcelorMittal, Nucor and US Steel, accounting for a majority of the domestic steel market. Collectively, we purchased approximately 38% and 46% of our total steel requirements from these three suppliers in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Although we have no long-term supply commitments, we believe we have good relationships with each of our steel suppliers. If, in the future, we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of steel on a timely basis, we may not be able to obtain steel from alternate sources at competitive prices. In addition, interruptions or reductions in our supply of steel could make it difficult to satisfy our customers’ just-in-time delivery requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Competition

 

Our principal markets are highly competitive. We compete with other regional and national steel service centers, single location service centers and, to a certain degree, steel producers and intermediate steel processors on a regional basis. We have different competitors for each of our products and within each region. We compete on the basis of price, product selection and availability, customer service, quality and geographic proximity. Certain of our competitors have greater financial and operating resources than we have.

 

With the exception of certain Canadian operations, foreign-located steel service centers are generally not a material competitive factor in our principal domestic markets.

 

Management Information Systems

 

Information systems are an important component of our strategy. We have invested in technologies and human resources required in this area and expect to make substantial further investments in the future. We currently maintain four separate computer-based systems in the operation of our business and we depend on these systems to a significant degree, particularly for inventory management.

 

Our information systems focus on the following core application areas:

 

Inventory Management.  Our information systems track the status of inventories by location on a daily basis. This information is essential in allowing us to closely monitor and manage our inventory.

 

Differentiated Services To Customers.  Our information systems allow us to provide value-added services to customers, including quality control and on-time delivery monitoring and reporting, just-in-time inventory management and shipping services, and EDI communications.

 

Internal Communications.  We believe that our ability to quickly and efficiently share information across our operations is critical to our success. We have invested in various communications, data warehouses and workgroup technologies, which enable managers and employees to remain effective and responsive.

 

E-Commerce and Advanced Customer Interaction.  We are actively involved in electronic commerce initiatives, including both our own sponsored initiatives and participation in customer e-procurement initiatives. We have implemented extranet sites for specific customers, which are integrated with our internal business systems to streamline the costs and time associated with processing electronic transactions.

 

We are currently developing an enterprise-wide system alternative to replace our legacy operating systems. The objective is to standardize and streamline business processes and improve support for our growing service center and fabrication business. The project plan, which began in July 2006, is for a phased-implementation over the next two years with estimated external costs approximating $15 million.

 

We continue to actively seek opportunities to utilize information technologies to reduce costs and improve services within our organization and across the steel supply chain. This includes working with individual steel producers and customers, and participating in industry sponsored groups to develop information processing standards to benefit those in the supply chain.

We also continue to pursue business process improvements to standardize and streamline order fulfillment, improve efficiency and reduce costs. Our business systems analysts work with our ISO quality team to evaluate all opportunities that may yield savings and better service to our customers.

 

Employees

 

At December 31, 2007, we employed approximately 1,170 people, of which approximately 200 of the hourly plant personnel at our Minneapolis and Detroit facilities are represented by four separate collective bargaining units.

 

A collective bargaining agreement covering approximately five Detroit maintenance workers expired on July 31, 2007. Employees covered under this agreement continue to operate as a new agreement is negotiated. While we expect to be able to negotiate a new agreement, there can be no assurances that such resolution will occur. Collective bargaining agreements covering Minneapolis and other Detroit employees expire in 2009 and subsequent years. We have never experienced a work stoppage and we believe that our relationship with employees is good. However, any prolonged work stoppages by our personnel represented by collective bargaining units could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Service Marks, Trade Names and Patents

 

We conduct our business under the name “Olympic Steel.” A provision of federal law grants exclusive rights to the word “Olympic” to the U.S. Olympic Committee. The U.S. Supreme Court has recognized, however, that certain users may be able to continue to use the word based on long-term and continuous use. We have used the name Olympic Steel since 1954, but are prevented from registering the name “Olympic” and from being qualified to do business as a foreign corporation under that name in certain states. In such states, we have registered under different names, including “Oly Steel” and “Olympia Steel.” Our wholly-owned subsidiary, Olympic Steel Lafayette, Inc., does business in certain states under the names “Olympic Steel Detroit,” “Lafayette Steel and Processing” and “Lafayette Steel.” Our operation in Georgia does business under the name “Southeastern Metal Processing” and PS&W conducts business under the name “Olympic Steel North Carolina.”

 

We also hold a trademark for our stainless steel sheet and plate product “OLY-FLATBRITE”, which has a unique combination of surface finish and flatness.

 

Government Regulation

 

Our operations are governed by many laws and regulations, including those relating to workplace safety and worker health, principally the Occupational Safety and Health Act and regulations thereunder. We believe that we are in material compliance with these laws and regulations and do not believe that future compliance with such laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Environmental

 

Our facilities are subject to certain federal, state and local requirements relating to the protection of the environment. We believe that we are in material compliance with all environmental laws, do not anticipate any material expenditures to meet environmental requirements and do not believe that compliance with such laws and regulations will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Effects of Inflation

 

Inflation generally affects us by increasing the cost of employee wages and benefits, transportation services, processing equipment, purchased steel, energy and borrowings under our credit facility. General inflation has not had a material effect on our financial results during the past three years; however, we have experienced increased distribution expense as a result of higher fuel costs.

Backlog

 

Because we conduct our operations generally on the basis of short-term orders, we do not believe that backlog is a meaningful indicator of future performance.

 

Available Information

 

We file annual, quarterly, and current reports, proxy statements, and other documents with the SEC under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. The public may read and copy any materials filed with the SEC at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. Also, the SEC maintains an Internet website that contains reports, proxy and information statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC. The public can obtain any documents that are filed by the Company at http://www.sec.gov.

 

In addition, this Annual Report on Form 10-K, as well as our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to all of the foregoing reports, are made available free of charge on or through the “Investor Relations” section of our website (www.olysteel.com) as soon as reasonably practicable after such reports are electronically filed with or furnished to the SEC.

 

Information relating to corporate governance at Olympic Steel, including its Business Ethics Policy, information concerning executive officers, directors and Board committees (including committee charters), and transactions in Olympic Steel securities by directors and officers, is available free of charge on or through the “Investor Relations” section of our website at www.olysteel.com. We are not including the information on our website as a part of, or incorporating it by reference into, this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

Forward-Looking Information

 

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and other documents we file with the SEC contain various forward-looking statements that are based on current expectations, estimates, forecasts and projections about our future performance, business, our beliefs and our management’s assumptions. In addition, we, or others on our behalf, may make forward-looking statements in press releases or written statements, or in our communications and discussions with investors and analysts in the normal course of business through meetings, conferences, webcasts, phone calls and conference calls. Words such as “may,” “will,” “anticipate,” “should,” “intend,” “expect,” “believe,” “estimate,” “project,” “plan,” “potential,” and “continue,” as well as the negative of these terms or similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements, which are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause our actual results to differ materially from those implied by such statements including, but not limited to, those set forth in Item 1A (Risk Factors) below and the following:

 

 

 

Should one or more of these or other risks or uncertainties materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect, actual results may vary materially from those anticipated, intended, expected, believed, estimated, projected or planned. You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date hereof. We undertake no obligation to republish revised forward-looking statements to reflect the occurrence of unanticipated events or circumstances after the date hereof, except as otherwise required by law.

 

In addition to the other information in this Annual Report and our other filings with the SEC, the following risk factors should be carefully considered in evaluating us and our business before investing in our common stock. The risks and uncertainties described below are not the only ones facing us. Additional risks and uncertainties, not presently known to us or otherwise, may also impair our business. If any of the risks actually occur, our business, financial condition or results of operations could be materially and adversely affected. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and investors may lose all or part of their investment.

 

Risks Related to our Business

 

Volatile steel prices can cause significant fluctuations in our operating results. Our sales and operating income could decrease if we are unable to pass producer price increases on to our customers.

 

Our principal raw material is flat-rolled carbon, coated and stainless steel that we typically purchase from multiple primary steel producers. The steel industry as a whole is cyclical and, at times, pricing and availability of steel can be volatile due to numerous factors beyond our control, including general domestic and international economic conditions, labor costs, sales levels, competition, levels of inventory held by other steel service centers, consolidation of steel producers, higher raw material costs for the producers of steel, import duties and tariffs and currency exchange rates. This volatility can significantly affect the availability and cost of raw materials for us.

 

We, like many other steel service centers, maintain substantial inventories of steel to accommodate the short lead times and just-in-time delivery requirements of our customers. Accordingly, we purchase steel in an effort to maintain our inventory at levels that we believe to be appropriate to satisfy the anticipated needs of our customers based upon historic buying practices, contracts with customers and market conditions. Our commitments to purchase steel are generally at prevailing market prices in effect at the time we place our orders. We have no long-term, fixed-price steel purchase contracts. When steel prices increase, competitive conditions will influence how much of the price increase we can pass on to our customers. To the extent we are unable to pass on future price increases in our raw materials to our customers, the net sales and profitability of our business could be adversely affected. When steel prices decline, customer demands for lower prices and our competitors’ responses to those demands could result in lower sale prices and, consequently, lower margins as we use existing steel inventory. Changing steel prices therefore could significantly impact our net sales, gross margins, operating income and net income.

 

China is a large consumer of steel and steel products, which are integral to its current large scale industrial expansion. This large and growing demand for steel by China has significantly affected the global steel industry. Actions by domestic and foreign producers, including steel companies in China, to increase production could result in an increased supply of steel in the United States, which could result in lower prices for our products. Further, should China experience an economic downturn or slowing of its growth, its steel consumption could decrease and some of the supply it currently uses could be diverted to the U.S. markets we serve, which could depress steel prices. A decline in steel prices could adversely affect our sales, margins and profitability.

 

We service industries that are highly cyclical, and any downturn in our customers’ industries could reduce our sales, margins and profitability.

 

We sell our products in a variety of industries, including capital equipment manufacturers for industrial, agricultural and construction use, the automotive industry, and manufacturers of fabricated metal products. Our largest category of customers is producers of industrial machinery and equipment. Numerous factors, such as general economic conditions, consumer confidence, significant business interruptions, labor shortages or work stoppages, energy prices, seasonality, customer inventory levels and other factors beyond our control, may cause significant demand fluctuations from one or more of these industries. Any decrease in demand within one or more of these industries may be significant and may last for a lengthy period of time. Periods of economic slowdown or recession in the United States, downturns in demand, excess customer inventory or a decrease in the prices that we can realize from sales of our products to customers in any of these industries could result in lower sales, margins and profitability.

Approximately 8.5% of our 2007 sales were to automotive manufacturers or manufacturers of automotive components and parts, whom we refer to as automotive customers. Historically, due to the concentration of customers in the automotive industry, our gross margins on these sales have generally been less than our margins on sales to customers in other industries. The continued difficulties faced by domestic automotive customers has further challenged its supply base. In addition, the precarious nature of the financial position of many domestic automotive customers has caused us to forego sales due to credit concerns. We do not expect the problems faced by our domestic automotive customers to significantly improve in the near future. If we are unable to generate sufficient future cash flow on our sales to automotive customers, we may be required to record an impairment charge against the assets that are used to service those customers.

 

Our success is dependent upon our relationships with certain key customers.

 

We have derived and expect to continue to derive a significant portion of our revenues from a relatively limited number of customers. Collectively, our top three customers accounted for approximately 13% and 21% of our revenues in 2007 and 2006, respectively. Many of our larger customers commit to purchase on a regular basis at agreed upon prices ranging for periods from three to twelve months. We generally do not have long-term contracts with our customers. As a result, the relationship, as well as particular orders, can generally be terminated with relatively little advance notice. The loss of any one of our major customers could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

 

Customer credit constraints and credit losses could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

In climates of higher steel prices, increased sales volume and consolidation among capital providers to the steel industry, the ability of our customers to maintain credit availability has become more challenging. In particular, certain customers in the automotive industry and companies that are highly leveraged represent an increasing credit risk. Some customers have reduced their purchases because of these credit constraints. Moreover, our disciplined credit policies have, in some instances, resulted in lost sales. In recent years, we have experienced an increase in customer bankruptcies and could see further increases if credit availability becomes further constrained. Were we to lose sales or customers due to these actions, or if we have misjudged our credit estimations and they result in future credit losses, there could be a material adverse effect on business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

An interruption in the sources of our steel supply could have a material adverse effect on our results of operations.

 

In recent years, the steel producing supply base has experienced significant consolidation with the three largest domestic producers, ArcelorMittal, Nucor and US Steel, accounting for a majority of the domestic steel market. Collectively, we purchased approximately 38% and 46% of our total steel requirements from these suppliers in 2007 and 2006, respectively. The number of available suppliers could be reduced in the future by factors such as further industry consolidation or bankruptcies affecting steel suppliers. Additionally, fewer available suppliers increases the risk of supply disruption through unscheduled mill outages. We have no long-term supply commitments with our steel suppliers. If, in the future, we are unable to obtain sufficient amounts of steel on a timely basis, we may not be able to obtain steel from alternate sources at competitive prices. In addition, interruptions or reductions in our supply of steel could make it difficult to satisfy our customers’ just-in-time delivery requirements, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

We depend on our senior management team and the loss of any member could prevent us from implementing our business strategy.

 

Our success is dependent upon the management and leadership skills of our senior management team. We have employment agreements, which include non-competition provisions, with our Chief Executive Officer, President and Chief Operating Officer, and our Chief Financial Officer that expire on January 1, 2010, January 1, 2011, and January 1, 2012, respectively. The loss of any member of our senior management team or the failure to attract and

retain additional qualified personnel could prevent us from implementing our business strategy and continuing to grow our business at a rate necessary to maintain future profitability.

 

Labor disruptions at any of our facilities or those of major customers could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

 

At December 31, 2007, we employed approximately 1,170 people, of which approximately 200 of the hourly plant personnel at our Minneapolis and Detroit facilities are represented by four separate collective bargaining units. A collective bargaining agreement covering approximately five Detroit maintenance workers expired on July 31, 2007. Employees covered under this agreement continue to operate as a new agreement is negotiated. While we expect to be able to negotiate a new agreement, there can be no assurances that such resolution will occur. Collective bargaining agreements covering Minneapolis and other Detroit employees expire in 2009 and subsequent years. Any prolonged work stoppages by our personnel represented by collective bargaining units could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

In addition, many of our significant customers, including those in the automotive industry, have unionized workforces and have in the past experienced significant labor disruptions such as work stoppages, slow-downs and strikes. A labor disruption at one or more of our major customers could interrupt production or sales by that customer and cause that customer to halt or limit orders for our products. Any such reduction in the demand for our products could adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Risks associated with our growth strategy may adversely impact our ability to sustain our growth.

 

Historically, we have grown internally by increasing sales and services to our existing customers, aggressively pursuing new customers and services, building new facilities and acquiring and upgrading processing equipment in order to expand the range of value-added services we offer. In addition, we have grown through external expansion by the acquisition of other steel service centers and related businesses. We intend to actively pursue our growth strategy in the future.

 

The future expansion of an existing facility or construction on a new facility could have adverse effects on our results of operations due to the impact of the start-up costs and the potential for underutilization in the start-up phase of a facility. Consolidation in our industry has reduced the number of potential acquisition targets, and we are unable to predict whether or when any prospective acquisition candidate will become available or the likelihood that any acquisition will be completed. Moreover, in pursuing acquisition opportunities, we may compete for acquisition targets with other companies with similar growth strategies which may be larger and have greater financial and other resources than we have. Competition among potential acquirers could result in increased prices for acquisition targets. As a result, we may not be able to identify appropriate acquisition candidates or consummate acquisitions on satisfactory terms to us.

 

The pursuit of acquisitions may divert management’s time and attention away from day-to-day operations. In order to achieve growth through acquisitions, expansion of current facilities, greenfield construction or otherwise, additional funding sources may be needed and we may not be able to obtain the additional capital necessary to pursue our growth strategy on terms which are satisfactory to us.

 

The failure of our key computer-based systems could have a material adverse effect on our business.

 

We currently maintain four separate computer-based systems in the operation of our business and we depend on these systems to a significant degree, particularly for inventory management. These systems are vulnerable to, among other things, damage or interruption from fire, flood, tornado and other natural disasters, power loss, computer system and network failures, operator negligence, physical and electronic loss of data or security breaches and computer viruses. The destruction or failure of any one of our computer-based systems for any significant period of time could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

Our project to initiate implementation of a new information system could adversely affect our results of operations and cash flows.

 

In July 2006, we announced the initiation of a project to implement a new enterprise-wide information system, consolidating our legacy operating systems into one integrated system. The objective is to standardize and streamline business processes and improve support for our growing service center and fabrication business. The project plan, which began in July 2006, anticipates a phased-implementation over the next two years with estimated external implementation costs approximating $15 million. Risks associated with the implementation include, but are not limited to:

 

 

We can provide no assurance that the implementation process will be successful or will occur as planned and without disruption to operations. Difficulties associated with the design and implementation of the new information system could adversely affect our business, our customer service, our results of operations and our cash flows.

 

We may not be able to retain or expand our customer base if the U.S. manufacturing industry continues to erode.

 

Our customer base primarily includes manufacturing and industrial firms in the United States, some of which are, or have considered, relocating production operations outside the United States or outsourcing particular functions outside the United States. Some customers have closed because they were unable to compete successfully with foreign competitors. Our facilities are located in the United States and, therefore, to the extent that our customers relocate or move operations where we do not have a presence, we could lose their business.

 

Our business is highly competitive, and increased competition could reduce our market share and harm our financial performance.

 

Our business is highly competitive. We compete with steel service centers and, to a certain degree, steel producers and intermediate steel processors, on a regular basis, primarily on quality, price, inventory availability and the ability to meet the delivery schedules and service requirements of our customers. We have different competitors for each of our products and within each region. Certain of these competitors have financial and operating resources in excess of ours. Increased competition could lower our margins or reduce our market share and have a material adverse effect on our financial performance.

 

Increases in energy prices would increase our operating costs, and we may be unable to pass all these increases on to our customers in the form of higher prices.

 

If our energy costs increase disproportionately to our revenues, our earnings could be reduced. We use energy to process and transport our products. Our operating costs increase if energy costs, including electricity, gasoline and natural gas, rise. During periods of higher energy costs, we may not be able to recover our operating cost increases through price increases without reducing demand for our products. In addition, we generally do not hedge our exposure to higher prices via energy futures contracts. Increases in energy prices will increase our operating costs and may reduce our profitability if we are unable to pass all of the increases on to our customers.

We expect to finance our future growth through borrowings under our credit facility. Increased leverage could adversely impact our business and results of operations.

 

If we incur substantial additional debt under our credit facility or otherwise to finance future growth, our leverage could increase as could the risks associated with such leverage. A high degree of leverage could have important consequences to us. For example, it could:

 

 

Risks Related to Our Common Stock

 

The market price for our common stock may be volatile.

 

Historically, there has been volatility in the market price for our common stock. Furthermore, the market price of our common stock could fluctuate substantially in the future in response to a number of factors, including, but not limited to, the risk factors described herein. Examples include:

 

 

Recently, the stock market has experienced significant price and volume fluctuations. This volatility has had a significant effect on the market prices of securities issued by many companies for reasons unrelated to their specific operating performance. These broad market fluctuations may materially adversely affect our stock price, regardless of our operating results.

 

Our quarterly results may be volatile.

 

Our operating results have varied on a quarterly basis during our operating history and are likely to fluctuate significantly in the future. Our operating results may be below the expectations of our investors or stock market analysts as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control. Factors that may affect our quarterly operating results include, but are not limited, the risk factors listed above.

 

Many factors could cause our revenues and operating results to vary significantly in the future. Accordingly, we believe that quarter-to-quarter comparisons of our operating results are not necessarily meaningful. Investors should not rely on the results of one quarter as an indication of our future performance. Further, it is our practice not to provide forward-looking sales or earnings guidance and not to endorse any analyst’s sales or earnings estimates. Nonetheless, if our results of operations in any quarter do not meet analysts’ expectations, our stock price could materially decrease.

 

 

None.

 

We believe that our properties are strategically situated relative to our domestic suppliers, our customers and each other, allowing us to support customers from multiple locations. This permits us to provide inventory and processing services, which are available at one operation but not another. Steel is shipped from the most advantageous facility, regardless of where the order is taken. The facilities are located in the hubs of major steel consumption markets, and within a 250-mile radius of most of our customers, a distance approximating the one-day driving and delivery limit for truck shipments. The following table sets forth certain information concerning our principal properties:

 

 

 

 

Our international sales office is located in Jacksonville, Florida. All of the properties listed in the table as owned are subject to mortgages securing our credit facility. Management believes we will be able to accommodate our capacity needs for the immediate future at our existing facilities.

 

 

We are party to various legal actions that we believe are ordinary in nature and incidental to the operation of our business. In the opinion of management, the outcome of the proceedings to which we are currently a party will not have a material adverse effect upon our results of operations, financial condition or cash flows.

 

None.

 

This information is included in this Annual Report pursuant to Instruction 3 of Item 401(b) of Regulation S-K. The following is a list of our executive officers and a brief description of their business experience. Each executive officer will hold office until his successor is chosen and qualified.

 

Michael D. Siegal, age 55, has served as our Chief Executive Officer since 1984, and as Chairman of our Board of Directors since 1994. From 1984 until January 2001, he also served as our President. He has been employed by us in a variety of capacities since 1974. Mr. Siegal is a member of the Board of Directors and Executive Committee of the Metals Service Center Institute. He previously served as National Chairman of Israel Bonds and presently serves as Vice Chairman of the Development Corporation for Israel. He is a past officer for the Cleveland Jewish Community Federation. He is also a member of the Board of Directors of American National Bank (Cleveland, Ohio) and University Hospitals — Rainbow Babies Committee (Cleveland, Ohio).

 

David A. Wolfort, age 55, has served as our President since January 2001 and Chief Operating Officer since 1995. He has been a director since 1987. He previously served as Vice President Commercial from 1987 to 1995, after having joined us in 1984 as General Manager. Prior thereto, he spent eight years with a primary steel producer in a variety of sales assignments. Mr. Wolfort is a director of the Metal Service Center Institute and previously served as Chairman of its Political Action Committee and Governmental Affairs Committee. He is also a member of the Northern Ohio Regional Board of the Anti-Defamation League.

 

Richard T. Marabito, age 44, serves as our Chief Financial Officer. He joined us in 1994 as Corporate Controller and served in this capacity until being named Chief Financial Officer in March 2000. He also served as Treasurer from 1994 through 2002. Prior to joining us, Mr. Marabito served as Corporate Controller for Waxman Industries, Inc., a publicly traded wholesale distribution company. Mr. Marabito was employed from 1985 to 1990 by a national accounting firm in its audit department. Mr. Marabito is a director of the Metal Service Center Institute and is the Chairman of its Foundation for Education and Research. He is also a board member of the Make-A-Wish Foundation of Northeast Ohio.

 

Richard A. Manson, age 39, has served as our Treasurer since January 2003, and has been employed by us since 1996. From 1996 through 2002, he served as Director of Taxes and Risk Management. Prior to joining us, Mr. Manson was employed for seven years by a national accounting firm in its tax department. Mr. Manson is a certified public accountant and is a member of the Ohio Society of Certified Public Accountants and the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants.

 

Esther M. Potash, age 56, has served as our Chief Information Officer since April 2007, and has been employed by us since 1998. Prior to joining us, Ms. Potash spent 13 years as a management consultant with a public accounting firm and six years as an analyst with the United States Navy. Ms. Potash is a member of the Association of Women in the Metal Industries.

 

 

Price Range of Common Stock

 

Our common stock trades on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “ZEUS.” The following table sets forth, for each quarter in the two-year period ended December 31, 2007, the high and low sales prices of our Common Stock as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market:

 

 

Holders of Record

 

On March 1, 2008, we estimate there were approximately 100 holders of record and 2,200 beneficial holders of our common stock.

 

Dividends

 

During 2007, our Board of Directors approved quarterly dividends of $.03 per share that were paid on March 15, 2007 and June 15, 2007 and dividends of $.04 per share that were paid on September 17, 2007 and December 17, 2007.

 

During 2006, our Board of Directors approved quarterly dividends of $.03 per share that were paid on March 15, 2006, June 15, 2006, September 15, 2006 and December 15, 2006.

 

We expect to make regular quarterly dividend distributions in the future, subject to the continuing determination by our Board of Directors that the dividend remains in the best interest of our shareholders. The agreement governing our credit facility restricts the amount of dividends that we can pay. Any determinations by the Board of Directors to pay cash dividends in the future will take into account various factors, including our financial condition, results of operations, current and anticipated cash needs, plans for expansion and current restrictions under our credit agreement. We cannot assure you that dividends will be paid in the future or that, if paid, the dividends will be at the same amount or frequency.

 

Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

 

We did not repurchase any of our equity securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2007.

 

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

We did not have any unregistered sales of equity securities during the year ended December 31, 2007.

 

The following table sets forth selected data of the Company for each of the five years in the period ended December 31, 2007. The data presented should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report.

 

 

 

 

The following Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from the results discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed under Item 1A. Risk Factors in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following section is qualified in its entirety by the more detailed information, including our financial statements and the notes thereto, which appears elsewhere in this Annual Report.

 

Overview

 

We are a leading U.S. steel service center with over 53 years of experience. Our primary focus is on the direct sale and distribution of large volumes of processed carbon, coated and stainless flat-rolled sheet, coil and plate products. We operate as an intermediary between steel producers and manufacturers that require processed steel for their operations. We serve customers in most carbon steel consuming industries, including manufacturers and fabricators of transportation and material handling equipment, construction and farm machinery, storage tanks, environmental and energy generation, automobiles, food service and electrical equipment, military vehicles and equipment, as well as general and plate fabricators and steel service centers. We distribute our products primarily through a direct sales force.

 

We operate as a single business segment with 15 strategically-located processing and distribution facilities in Connecticut, Georgia, Illinois, Iowa, Michigan, Minnesota, North Carolina, Ohio and Pennsylvania. This geographic footprint allows us to focus on regional customers and larger national and multi-national accounts, primarily located throughout the midwestern, eastern and southern United States.

 

We sell a broad range of steel products, many of which have different gross profits and margins. Products that have more value-added processing generally have a greater gross profit and higher margins. Accordingly, our overall gross profit is affected by, among other things, product mix, the amount of processing performed, the availability of steel, volatility in selling prices and material purchase costs. We also perform toll processing of customer-owned steel, the majority of which is performed by our Michigan and Georgia operations. We sell certain products internationally, primarily in Puerto Rico and Mexico. All international sales and payments are made in United States dollars. Recent international sales have been immaterial to our consolidated financial results.

 

Our results of operations are affected by numerous external factors including, but not limited to, general and global business, economic and political conditions, competition, steel pricing and availability, energy prices, pricing and availability of raw materials used in the production of steel, inventory held in the supply chain, customer demand for steel and customers’ ability to manage their credit line availability and layoffs or work stoppages by our own, our suppliers’ or our customers’ personnel. The steel industry also continues to be affected by the global consolidation of our suppliers, competitors and end-use customers.

 

On May 1, 2006, we acquired the remaining 51% interest in GSP. Prior to May 1, our 49% interest in GSP was accounted for under the equity method. Since May 2006, the results of GSP have been fully consolidated into our financial statements. We subsequently sold the remaining assets of GSP in December 2007 and GSP ceased operations. In January 2006, we announced plans to close the OLP joint venture in Detroit, Michigan. OLP, which was a processor of laser welded steel blanks for the automotive industry, ceased operations in the first quarter of 2006. Our 50% interest in OLP is accounted for under the equity method.

 

In June 2006, we acquired all of the outstanding stock of PS&W, a North Carolina-based fabricator of heavy construction equipment components. Since June 2006, the results of PS&W have been fully consolidated into our financial statements.

 

At December 31, 2007, we employed approximately 1,170 people, of which approximately 200 of the hourly plant personnel at our Minneapolis and Detroit facilities are represented by four separate collective bargaining units. A collective bargaining agreement covering approximately five Detroit maintenance workers expired on July 31, 2007. Employees covered under this agreement continue to operate as a new agreement is negotiated. While we expect to be able to negotiate a new agreement, there can be no assurances that such resolution will occur.

Collective bargaining agreements covering Minneapolis and other Detroit employees expire in 2009 and subsequent years. We have never experienced a work stoppage and we believe that our relationship with employees is good. However, any prolonged work stoppages by our personnel represented by collective bargaining units could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

This discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. The preparation of these financial statements requires the use of estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements. Actual results could differ from these estimates, under different assumptions or conditions. On an on-going basis, we monitor and evaluate our estimates and assumptions.

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in preparation of our consolidated financial statements:

 

Allowance for Doubtful Accounts Receivable

 

We maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of our customers to make required payments. The allowance is maintained at a level considered appropriate based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues that we have identified. Estimations are based upon the application of an historical collection rate to the outstanding accounts receivable balance, which remains fairly level from year to year, and judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers, which can fluctuate significantly from year to year. We cannot be certain that the rate of future credit losses will be similar to past experience. We consider all available information when assessing the adequacy of our allowance for doubtful accounts each quarter.

 

Inventory Valuation

 

Our inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the costs of the purchased steel, internal and external processing, and inbound freight. Cost is determined using the specific identification method. We regularly review our inventory on hand and record provisions for obsolete and slow-moving inventory based on historical and current sales trends. Changes in product demand and our customer base may affect the value of inventory on hand, which may require higher provisions for obsolete or slow-moving inventory.

 

Impairment of Long-Lived Assets

 

We evaluate the recoverability of long-lived assets and the related estimated remaining lives whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Events or changes in circumstances that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to the historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner or the use of the assets or the strategy for the overall business, or significant negative industry or economic trends. We record an impairment or change in useful life whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed.

 

Income Taxes

 

Deferred income taxes on the consolidated balance sheet include, as an offset to the estimated temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts on the consolidated balance sheets, the tax effect of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. If we determine that we will not be able to fully realize a deferred tax asset, we will record a valuation allowance to reduce such deferred tax asset to its net realizable value.

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue is recognized in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, Revenue Recognition. For both direct and toll shipments, revenue is recognized when steel is shipped to the customer and title and risk of loss is transferred which generally occurs upon delivery to our customers. Given the proximity of our customers to our facilities, substantially all of our sales are shipped and received within one day. Sales returns and allowances are treated as reductions to sales and are provided for based on historical experience and current estimates and are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Results of Operations

 

The following table sets forth certain income statement data for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 (dollars shown in thousands):

 

 

 

 

2007 Compared to 2006

 

Tons sold in 2007 decreased 1.4% to 1.25 million tons from 1.27 million tons last year. Tons sold in 2007 included 1.10 million tons from direct sales and 150 thousand tons from toll processing, compared with 1.07 million direct tons and 202 thousand toll tons in 2006.

 

Net sales in 2007 increased 4.9% to $1.03 billion from $981.0 million. Average selling prices for 2007 increased 6.4% from 2006. We expect average selling prices to increase during the first quarter of 2008, as steel pricing in the first quarter of 2008 has increased substantially over steel pricing in the fourth quarter of 2007, and we attempt to pass through price increases from steel producers to our customers.

 

In 2007, gross profit (exclusive of depreciation), as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 19.6% from 20.5% in 2006. Higher inventory levels at steel service centers at the beginning of 2007 led to competitive pressures and lower sales prices and gross margins throughout most of the year. As we enter 2008, inventory levels at service centers are relatively low. Steel producers began increasing prices during the fourth quarter of 2007 and announced significant price increases during the first quarter of 2008. We believe that steel supply will be constrained during the first half of 2008 due to domestic production constraints and the lack of available imported steel. Accordingly, we expect that competitive pressures to obtain steel will result in higher selling prices and gross margin levels during the first quarter of 2008, as compared to the fourth quarter of 2007.

 

As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses for 2007 increased to 15.4% from 14.9% in 2006. Operating expenses for 2007 increased 8.1% to $158.5 million from $146.5 million in 2006. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to the inclusion of a full year of PS&W’s operating expenses in 2007 and a full year of costs associated with the development of our new information system (which began during the third quarter of 2006).

 

Financing costs for 2007 increased to $2.8 million from $2.7 million in 2007. Our effective borrowing rate, inclusive of deferred financing fees, was 7.4% in 2007, compared to 7.5% in 2006.

 

In 2007, we reported income before income taxes of $40.5 million, compared to $49.4 million in 2006. An income tax provision of 37.6% was recorded during 2007, compared to 37.2% in 2006. Taxes paid in 2007 totaled $11.7 million, compared to $19.3 million in 2006. We expect our effective tax rate in 2008 to approximate 38%.

Net income for 2007 totaled $25.3 million or $2.35 per diluted share, compared to $31.0 million or $2.92 per diluted share in 2006.

 

2006 Compared to 2005

 

Tons sold in 2006 decreased 1.0% to 1.27 million tons from 1.28 million tons in 2005. Tons sold in 2006 included 1.07 million tons from direct sales and 202 thousand tons from toll processing, compared with 1.09 million direct tons and 189 thousand toll tons in 2005.

 

Net sales in 2006 increased 4.4% to $981.0 million from $939.2 million. Average selling prices for 2006 increased 5.5% from 2005.

 

In 2006, gross profit, as a percentage of net sales, increased to 20.5% from 17.7% in 2005. As the base price of steel declined during the first nine months of 2005, competitive pressures resulted in lower selling prices and gross margin. Gross margin levels began increasing during the end of the third quarter of 2005 and we experienced higher average selling prices and higher gross margins through the third quarter of 2006. During the fourth quarter of 2006, higher inventory levels at steel service centers led to competitive pressures, declining sales prices and lower gross margins.

 

As a percentage of net sales, operating expenses for 2006 increased to 14.9% from 13.0% in 2005. Operating expenses for 2006 increased 19.6% to $146.5 million from $122.5 million in 2005. The increase in operating expenses was primarily attributable to higher distribution costs caused by higher fuel costs and surcharges, the addition of our second facility in Chambersburg, Pennsylvania, the increased number of laser processing machines in operation, increased variable compensation expense, expenses associated with the implementation of our new information system, and the inclusion of operating expenses related to the consolidation of GSP (starting on May 1) and the acquisition of PS&W (starting on June 2).

 

In 2006, we adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123-R, Share Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123-R) which requires us to record compensation expense for stock options issued to employees and directors. Prior to 2006, we accounted for stock options granted to employees and directors under the intrinsic value method of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, where no compensation expense was recognized. We elected to use the modified prospective transition method where compensation expense is recorded prospectively. The adoption of SFAS No. 123-R resulted in $127 thousand of expense being recorded for stock options during 2006, compared to no stock option expense being recognized during 2005.

 

In 2006, losses from joint ventures totaled $137 thousand compared with $625 thousand in 2005. OLP ceased operations during the first quarter of 2006. Operating losses generated by OLP during the first quarter of 2006 were recorded against the $3.5 million reserve for loss on disposition of joint ventures that was recorded at December 31, 2005. During the second and third quarters of 2006, OLP began liquidating its remaining assets. Offers from third parties to purchase the remaining assets were less than anticipated and we recorded an additional $2.0 million charge in the second quarter of 2006.

 

Financing costs for 2006 decreased to $2.7 million from $3.7 million in 2005 due to lower borrowing levels in 2006. Our effective borrowing rate, inclusive of deferred financing fees, was 7.5% in 2006 compared to 8.9% in 2005.

 

In 2006, we reported income before income taxes of $49.4 million, compared to $36.2 million in 2005. An income tax provision of 37.2% was recorded during 2006, compared to 39.0% in 2005. Taxes paid in 2006 totaled $19.3 million, compared to $16.9 million in 2005.

 

Net income for 2006 totaled $31.0 million or $2.92 per diluted share, compared to $22.1 million or $2.11 per diluted share in 2005.

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

Our principal capital requirements include funding working capital needs, purchasing and upgrading of processing equipment and facilities, making acquisitions and paying dividends. We use cash generated from operations, leasing transactions and borrowings under our credit facility to fund these requirements.

Working capital at December 31, 2007 decreased $24.8 million from the end of the prior year. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $32.2 million decrease in inventories, partially offset by a $2.6 million increase in accounts receivable, a $2.4 million increase in prepaids and others and a $2.5 million increase in cash.

 

During 2007, we generated $64.7 million of net cash from operations, of which $34.5 million was derived from cash earnings and $30.2 million was generated from working capital.

 

In 2007, we spent $12.5 million on capital expenditures. We completed a $3.9 million project to equip and expand our Iowa facility by approximately 54,000 square feet in order to meet our customers’ needs for high quality sheet product. We have also installed additional laser and plasma cutting equipment and machining centers in Cleveland, Chicago, Chambersburg and PS&W to support our growing value-added services. Due to the risk of technological obsolescence, it has been our policy to lease new laser cutting equipment. In 2007, we ordered a $5.5 million stretcher-leveler cut-to-length line for our Minneapolis Coil Facility, which is expected to become operational in the second quarter of 2008. We are also in the process of implementing a new single information system to replace the four systems we currently use. The objective is to standardize and streamline business processes and improve support for our growing service center and fabrication business. The project will require a significant deployment of capital and will require a significant use of management’s time. The total external costs associated with the new information system are expected to approximate $15 million over a phased-implementation that began in July 2006. We expect capital spending to approximate $40 million in 2008 to further our value-added strategies in both existing and new facilities.

 

During 2007, our Board of Directors approved quarterly dividends of $.03 per share that were paid on March 15, 2007 and June 12, 2007. The Board of Directors then increased the quarterly dividend to $.04 per share, which were paid on September 17, 2007 and December 17, 2007. In February 2008, our Board of Directors approved a quarterly dividend of $.04 per share, which is payable on March 17, 2008 to shareholders of record as of March 3, 2008. We expect to make regular dividend distributions in the future, subject to the availability of cash and continuing determination by our Board of Directors that the payment of dividends remains in the best interest of our shareholders.

 

Our secured bank financing agreement is a revolving credit facility collateralized by our accounts receivable, inventories and substantially all of our property and equipment. Borrowings are limited to the lesser of a borrowing base, comprised of eligible accounts receivable and inventories or, effective with a July 2007 amendment, $130 million in the aggregate. The maturity date of the credit facility is December 15, 2010, with annual extensions at the banks’ option.

 

In December 2006, we advanced $3.16 million to OLP to cover a loan guarantee obligation. We believe the underlying value of OLP’s remaining assets, upon liquidation, will be sufficient to repay the advance at a later date.

 

The credit facility requires us to comply with various covenants, the most significant of which include: (i) minimum availability of $10 million, tested monthly; (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.25, and a maximum leverage ratio of 1.75, which are tested quarterly; (iii) restrictions on additional indebtedness; and (iv) limitations on capital expenditures and investments. At December 31, 2007, we had approximately $110 million of availability and were in compliance with our covenants under the credit facility. The credit facility also contains an accordion feature that allows us to add up to $25 million of additional revolver capacity in certain circumstances.

 

Substantially higher steel prices in the first quarter of 2008 will result in increased working capital levels. We believe that funds available under our credit facility and lease arrangements, together with funds generated from operations, will be sufficient to provide us with the liquidity necessary to fund anticipated working capital requirements and capital expenditure requirements over at least the next 12 months. In the future, we may as part of our business strategy, acquire and dispose of other assets in the same or complementary lines of business, or enter into or exit strategic alliances and joint ventures. Accordingly, the timing and size of our capital requirements are subject to change as business conditions warrant and opportunities arise.

Contractual Obligations

 

The following table reflects our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2007.

 

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

An off-balance sheet arrangement is any contractual arrangement involving an unconsolidated entity under which a company has (a) made guarantees, (b) a retained or a contingent interest in transferred assets, (c) any obligation under certain derivative instruments, or (d) any obligation under a material variable interest in an unconsolidated entity that provides financing, liquidity, market risk, or credit risk support to a company, or engages in leasing, hedging, or research and development services within a company.

 

As of December 31, 2007, we had no material off-balance sheet arrangements.

 

Effects of Inflation

 

Inflation generally affects us by increasing the cost of employee wages and benefits, transportation services, processing equipment, purchased steel, energy and borrowings under our credit facility. General inflation has not had a material effect on our financial results during the past three years; however, we have experienced increased distribution expense as a result of higher fuel costs.

 

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurements. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. We do not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on our consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (SFAS No. 159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on these instruments in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of January 1, 2008, and we do not expect to adopt the fair value option.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (SFAS No. 160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. SFAS No. 160 requires all entities to report noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries (also known as minority interests) as a separate component of equity in the consolidated statement of financial position, to clearly identify consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest on the face of the consolidated statement of income and to provide sufficient disclosure that clearly identifies and distinguishes between the interest of the parent and the interests of controlling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective as of January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the SFAS No. 160; however, we do not expect any material financial implications relating to the adoption of this statement.

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R (SFAS No. 141R), Business Combinations. This statement requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed and requires the acquirer to disclose certain information related to the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective for business combinations entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Depending on the terms, conditions and details of the business combination, if any, that take place subsequent to January 1, 2009, SFAS No. 141R may have a material impact on our financial statements.

 

 

During the past several years, the base price of carbon flat-rolled steel has fluctuated significantly. Declining prices could reduce our gross profit margin percentages to levels that are lower than our historical levels. Higher inventory levels held by us, other steel service centers or end-use customers could cause competitive pressures that could also reduce gross margins. Higher raw material costs for steel producers could cause the price of steel to increase. While we have generally been successful in the past in passing producers’ price increases and surcharges to our customers, there is no guarantee that we will be able to pass price increases to our customers in the future.

 

Approximately 8.5% of our net sales in 2007 were directly to automotive customers. The automotive industry experiences significant fluctuations in demand based on numerous factors such as general economic conditions and consumer confidence. The automotive industry is also subject, from time-to-time, to labor work stoppages. The domestic automotive industry, which has experienced a number of bankruptcies, is currently involved in significant restructuring which has resulted in lower production volumes. Certain customers in this industry represent an increasing credit risk.

 

Inflation generally affects us by increasing the cost of employee wages and benefits, transportation services, processing equipment, purchased steel, energy, and borrowings under our credit facility. General inflation has not had a material effect on our financial results during the past three years; however, we have experienced increased distribution expenses as a result of higher fuel costs.

 

When raw material prices increase, competitive conditions will influence how much of the steel price increase can be passed on to our customers. When raw material prices decline, customer demands for lower cost product result in lower selling prices. Declining steel prices have generally adversely affected our net sales and net income while increasing steel prices have favorably affected our net sales and net income.

 

We are exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and fluctuating steel prices. We have not entered into any interest rate or steel commodity hedge transactions for speculative purposes or otherwise.

 

Our primary interest rate risk exposure results from variable rate debt. If interest rates in the future were to increase 100 basis points (1.0%) from December 31, 2007 rates and, assuming no change in total debt from December 31, 2007 levels, the additional annual interest expense to us would be approximately $167 thousand. We currently do not hedge our exposure to variable interest rate risk. However, we have the option to enter into 30- to 180-day fixed base rate Euro loans under our credit facility.

 

Olympic Steel, Inc.

 

Index to Consolidated Financial Statements

 

 

To the Shareholders and Board of Directors

of Olympic Steel, Inc.:

 

In our opinion, the accompanying consolidated balance sheets and the related consolidated statements of operations, shareholders’ equity and cash flows present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Olympic Steel, Inc. and its subsidiaries at December 31, 2007 and 2006, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2007 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Also in our opinion, the Company maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). The Company’s management is responsible for these financial statements, for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express opinions on these financial statements and on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our integrated audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement and whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audits of the financial statements included examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audits also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinions.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (i) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (ii) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (iii) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP

 

Cleveland, Ohio

March 14, 2008

 

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.

 

Our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework, issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). Based on our assessment, we concluded that, as of December 31, 2007, our internal control over financial reporting was effective based on those criteria.

 

The effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2007 has been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, as stated in their report which appears herein.

Olympic Steel, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Olympic Steel, Inc.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these balance sheets.

Olympic Steel, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Olympic Steel, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Shareholders’ Equity

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these statements.

Olympic Steel, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For The Years Ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005
(dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

 

 

Principles of Consolidation

 

The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Olympic Steel, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries (collectively the Company or Olympic), after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. Investments in the Company’s joint ventures are accounted for under the equity method.

 

Nature of Business

 

The Company is a U.S. steel service center with over 53 years of experience in specialized processing and distribution of large volumes of carbon, coated carbon and stainless steel, flat-rolled sheet, and coil and plate products from 15 facilities in nine midwestern and eastern states. The Company operates as one business segment.

 

Accounting Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Concentration Risks

 

The Company is a major customer of flat-rolled coil and plate steel for many of its principal suppliers, but is not dependent on any one supplier. The Company purchased approximately 38%, 46% and 47% of its total steel requirements from its three largest suppliers in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

 

The Company has a diversified customer and geographic base, which reduces the inherent risk and cyclicality of its business. The concentration of net sales to the Company’s top 20 customers approximated 34%, 39% and 42% of net sales in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. In addition, the Company’s largest customer accounted for approximately 8%, 9% and 11% of net sales in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Sales to the three largest U.S. automobile manufacturers and their suppliers, made principally by the Company’s Detroit operation, and sales to other steel service centers, accounted for approximately 8.5% and 9%, respectively, of the Company’s net sales in 2007, 9% and 8% of net sales in 2006, and 12% and 10% of net sales in 2005.

 

Cash and Cash Equivalents

 

Cash equivalents consist of short-term highly liquid investments, with a three month or less maturity, which are readily convertible into cash.

 

Accounts Receivable

 

Accounts receivable are presented net of allowances for doubtful accounts of $1,427 and $1,188 as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. Bad debt expense totaled $493 in 2007, $1,044 in 2006 and $2,064 in 2005.

 

The Company’s allowance for doubtful accounts is maintained at a level considered appropriate based on historical experience and specific customer collection issues that the Company has identified. Estimations are based upon a calculated percentage of accounts receivable, which remains fairly level from year to year, and judgments about the probable effects of economic conditions on certain customers, which can fluctuate significantly from year to year.

Inventories

 

Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include the costs of purchased steel, inbound freight, external processing and applicable labor and overhead costs related to internal processing. Cost is determined using the specific identification method.

 

Property and Equipment, and Depreciation

 

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets ranging from 5 to 30 years.

 

Goodwill

 

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of an acquired business. In accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized, but is tested for impairment annually.

 

Income Taxes

 

The Company, on its consolidated balance sheets, records as an offset to the estimated effect of temporary differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the reported amounts in its consolidated balance sheets, the tax effect of operating loss and tax credit carryforwards. If the Company determines that it will not be able to fully realize a deferred tax asset, it will record a valuation allowance to reduce such deferred tax asset to its realizable value. We recognize interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. Penalties, if incurred, would be recognized as a component of income tax expense.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

Revenue is recognized in accordance with the SEC’s Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104, “Revenue Recognition.” For both direct and toll shipments, revenue is recognized when steel is shipped to the customer and title and risk of loss is transferred which generally occurs upon delivery to our customers. Given the proximity of our customers to our facilities, substantially all of the Company’s sales are shipped and received within one day. Sales returns and allowances are treated as reductions to sales and are provided for based on historical experience and current estimates and are immaterial to the consolidated financial statements.

 

Shipping and Handling Fees and Costs

 

The Company classifies all amounts billed to a customer in a sales transaction related to shipping and handling as revenue. Additionally, the Company classifies costs incurred for shipping and handling to the customer as “Distribution” expense in its consolidated statements of operations.

 

Impairment

 

The Company evaluates the recoverability of long-lived assets and the related estimated remaining lives whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. Events or changes in circumstances that could trigger an impairment review include significant underperformance relative to the expected historical or projected future operating results, significant changes in the manner of the use of the acquired assets or the strategy for the overall business or significant negative industry or economic trends. The Company records an impairment or change in useful life whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may not be recoverable or the useful life has changed in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 144 (SFAS No. 144), Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

In 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123-R, Share Based Payment, (SFAS No. 123-R) which requires the recording of compensation expense for stock options issued to

employees and directors. Prior to 2006, the Company accounted for stock options granted to employees and directors under the intrinsic value method of Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25, where no compensation expense was recognized. The Company has elected to use the modified prospective transition method where compensation expense is recorded prospectively. For additional information, see Note 9, Stock Options.

 

Impact of Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

 

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (SFAS No. 157), Fair Value Measurements. This statement defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. This statement applies under other accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007. The Company does not expect the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.

 

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (SFAS No. 159), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities — Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115. This statement permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value and report unrealized gains and losses on these instruments in earnings. SFAS No. 159 is effective as of January 1, 2008, and the Company does not expect to adopt the fair value option.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 160 (SFAS No. 160), Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements — an Amendment of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51. SFAS No. 160 requires all entities to report noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries (also known as minority interests) as a separate component of equity in the consolidated statement of financial position, to clearly identify consolidated net income attributable to the parent and to the noncontrolling interest on the face of the consolidated statement of income and to provide sufficient disclosure that clearly identifies and distinguishes between the interest of the parent and the interests of controlling owners. SFAS No. 160 is effective as of January 1, 2009. We are currently evaluating the SFAS No. 160; however, the Company does not expect any material financial implications relating to the adoption of this statement.

 

In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141R (SFAS No. 141R), Business Combinations. This statement requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize all assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction, establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed and requires the acquirer to disclose certain information related to the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141R is effective for business combinations entered into in fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Depending on the terms, conditions and details of the business combination, if any, that take place subsequent to January 1, 2009, SFAS No. 141R may have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

 

In order to further expand value-added and fabrication capabilities, on June 2, 2006, the Company purchased all of the outstanding stock of Tinsley Group — PS&W, Inc. (PS&W) for a final purchase price of $9.0 million, which included $6.6 million of goodwill. The results of PS&W have been fully consolidated in the Company’s financial results since June 2, 2006.

 

PS&W is a full service fabricating company that utilizes burning, forming, machining, welding and painting to produce a wide variety of fabrications for large original equipment manufacturers of heavy construction equipment. PS&W was founded in 1990 and currently operates in two facilities in North Carolina.

 

 

The Company and the United States Steel Corporation (USS) each own 50% of Olympic Laser Processing (OLP), a company that produced laser welded sheet steel blanks for the automotive industry. In January 2006, the Company and USS announced the closing of OLP. In conjunction with the closing, during the fourth quarter of

2005, the Company recorded a $3,500 charge for the disposition of the joint venture, consisting of $1,300 for the impairment of the Company’s investment in OLP and a then-estimated $2,200 to be funded under the Company’s guarantee of OLP’s debt. OLP ceased operations during the first quarter of 2006. Operating losses incurred by OLP during the first quarter of 2006 were recorded against the $3,500 reserve. During the second and third quarters of 2006, OLP began liquidating its remaining assets. Offers from third-parties to purchase the remaining assets were less than anticipated and the Company recorded an additional $2,000 charge in the second quarter of 2006 to reflect additional expected obligations under the guarantee of OLP’s debt. In December 2006, the Company advanced $3,200 to OLP to cover a loan guarantee. The Company believes the underlying value of OLP’s remaining assets, upon liquidation, will be sufficient to repay the advance at a later date.

 

The Company recorded 50% of OLP’s net income or loss to its Consolidated Statement of Operations as “Income (Loss) from Joint Ventures.”

 

Prior to May 1, 2006, the Company held a 49% ownership interest in G.S.P., LLC (GSP), a venture to support the flat-rolled steel requirements of the automotive industry as a Minority Business Enterprise. In order to gain full control of GSP, on May 1, 2006, the Company purchased the remaining 51% ownership interest for $100 and GSP ceased qualification as a Minority Business Enterprise.

 

During 2006, all of GSP’s bank debt was extinguished, thereby eliminating the Company’s 49% guarantee of GSP’s demand note bank agreement.

 

Since May 1, 2006, GSP’s results have been fully consolidated in the Company’s financial statements. Prior to May 2006, the Company, using the equity method of accounting, recorded 49% of GSP’s net income or loss to its Consolidated Statement of Operations as “Income (Loss) from Joint Ventures.”

 

In December 2007, GSP’s remaining assets were sold and it ceased operations.

 

 

Property and equipment consists of the following:

 

 

Construction in progress, as of December 31, 2007 and 2006, primarily consisted of capitalized costs associated with the Company’s new information system which is expected to begin implementation in 2008 and other information technology projects and upgrades.

 

Steel inventories consisted of the following:

 

 

 

Credit Facility

 

The Company’s secured bank-financing agreement (the Credit Facility) is a revolving credit facility collateralized by the Company’s accounts receivable, inventories and substantially all of its property and equipment. Borrowings are limited to the lesser of a borrowing base, comprised of eligible receivables and inventories or, effective with a July 2007 amendment, $130,000 in the aggregate. The maturity date of the Credit Facility is December 15, 2010, with annual extensions at the banks’ option.

 

The Credit Facility requires the Company to comply with various covenants, the most significant of which include: (i) minimum availability of $10,000, tested monthly; (ii) a minimum fixed charge coverage rate of 1.25, and a maximum leverage ratio of 1.75, which are tested quarterly; (iii) restrictions on additional indebtedness; and (iv) limitations on dividends, capital expenditures and investments. At December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $110,000 of availability under the Credit Facility and the Company was in compliance with its covenants. The Credit Facility also contains an accordion feature which allows the Company to add up to $25,000 of additional revolver capacity in certain circumstances.

 

Outstanding checks are included as part of Accounts Payable on the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets and such checks totaled $13,900 as of December 31, 2007 and $16,900 as of December 31, 2006.

 

Scheduled Debt Maturities, Interest, Debt Carrying Values

 

The Company has no outstanding term loans. The overall effective interest rate for all debt amounted to 7.4%, 7.5% and 8.9% in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Interest paid totaled $3,392, $2,456, and $3,102 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Average total debt outstanding was $46,389, $41,549 and $59,120 in 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively.

 

The Company has not entered into interest rate transactions for speculative purposes or otherwise. The Company does not hedge its exposure to floating interest rate risk. However, the Company has the option to enter into 30- to 180- day fixed base rate Euro loans under the Credit Facility.

 

 

The components of the Company’s provision (benefit) for income taxes from continuing operations were as follows:

 

The components of the Company’s deferred income taxes at December 31 are as follows:

 

 

The Company adopted the provision of Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48 Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes: an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109 (FIN 48) on January 1, 2007. The adoption of FIN 48 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

 

We had unrecognized tax benefits of $3,059 that, if recognized, would have a favorable impact on our income tax expense of $2,359.

 

The following table summarizes the activity related to our gross unrecognized tax benefits from January 1, 2007 to December 31, 2007:

 

 

It is expected that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits will change in the next twelve months; however, the Company does not expect the change to have a significant impact on its results of operations or financial position. The tax years 2004-2006 remain open to examination by major taxing jurisdictions to which the Company is subject.

 

The Company recognized interest related to uncertain tax positions in income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007 and December 31, 2007, the Company had approximately $48 and $342 of gross accrued interest related to uncertain tax positions, respectively.

The following table reconciles the U.S. federal statutory rate to the Company’s effective tax rate:

 

 

Taxes paid in 2007, 2006 and 2005 totaled $11,699, $19,255 and $16,852, respectively. Some subsidiaries of the Company’s consolidated group file state tax returns on a separate company basis and have state net operating loss carryforwards expiring over the next 4 to 20 years. A valuation allowance is recorded to reduce certain deferred tax assets to the amount that is more likely than not to be realized.

 

 

The Company’s retirement plans consist of a 401(k) plan for PS&W employees, a profit-sharing plan and a 401(k) plan covering all other non-union employees, two separate 401(k) plans covering all union employees and a supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) covering certain executive officers of the Company.

 

Company contributions to the non-union profit-sharing plan are discretionary amounts as determined annually by the Board of Directors. The 401(k) retirement plans allow eligible employees to contribute up to the statutory maximum. The Company’s 401(k) matching contribution is determined annually by the Board of Directors and is based on a percentage of eligible employees’ earnings and contributions. For the non-union 401(k) retirement plan in 2007, 2006 and 2005, the Company matched one-half of each eligible employee’s contribution, limited to the first 6% of eligible compensation. The Company’s discretionary profit sharing contribution is determined annually by the Board of Directors.

 

Company contributions for each of the last three years for the union plans were 3% of eligible W-2 wages plus one half of the first 4% of each employee’s contribution.

 

In 2005, the Board of Directors adopted the SERP. Contributions to the SERP are based on: (i) a portion of the participants’ compensation multiplied by 13%; and (ii) a portion of the participants’ compensation multiplied by a factor which is contingent upon the Company’s return on invested capital. Benefits are subject to a vesting schedule of up to five years.

 

Retirement plan expense, which includes all Company 401(k), profit-sharing and SERP contributions, amounted to $3,019, $2,450 and $2,461 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006, and 2005, respectively.

 

 

In January 1994, the Stock Option Plan (Option Plan) was adopted by the Board of Directors and approved by the shareholders of the Company. Pursuant to the provisions of the Option Plan, key employees of the Company, non-employee directors and consultants may be offered the opportunity to acquire shares of common stock by the grant of stock options, including both incentive stock options (ISOs) and nonqualified stock options. ISOs are not available to non-employee directors or consultants. A total of 1,300,000 shares of common stock are reserved under the Option Plan. To the extent possible, shares of treasury stock are used to satisfy share resulting from the exercise of stock options. The purchase price of a share of common stock pursuant to an ISO will not be less than the fair market value of a share of common stock at the grant date. Options vest over periods ranging from 6 months to 5 years and all expire 10 years after the grant date.

 

The Option Plan terminates on January 5, 2009. Termination of the Option Plan will not affect outstanding options. As of December 31, 2007, there were no remaining shares of common stock available for grant under the Option Plan.

 

On January 1, 2006, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS No. 123-R and elected to use the modified prospective transition method. The modified prospective transition method requires that compensation cost be

recognized in the financial statements for all awards granted after the date of adoption as well as for existing awards for which the requisite service has not been rendered as of the date of adoption. The modified prospective transition does not require prior periods to be restated. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the Company accounted for stock-based compensation using the intrinsic value method prescribed in Accounting Principals Board Opinion No. 25, Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related Interpretations. The Company has elected to use the “short-cut method” to calculate the historical pool of windfall tax benefits upon adoption of SFAS No. 123-R. The election to use the “short-cut method” had no effect on the Company’s financial statements.

 

Under the intrinsic value method used prior to January 1, 2006, compensation expense for stock-based compensation was not recognized in our Consolidated Statements of Operations as all stock options granted by the Company had an exercise price equal to or greater than the market value of the underlying common stock on the option grant date.

 

The following table summarized the effect of the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R on the results of operations:

 

 

All pre-tax charges related to stock option expense were included in the caption “Administrative and general” on the accompanying Consolidated Statements of Operations. Prior to the adoption of SFAS No. 123-R, the Company presented all tax benefits of deductions resulting from the exercise of stock options as operating cash flow in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flow. SFAS No. 123-R requires the cash flow resulting from the tax deduction in excess of the compensation cost recognized for those options to be classified as financing cash flows. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, tax benefits realized from option exercises totaled $3.2 million and $2.4 million, respectively.

 

The fair value of each option grant was estimated as of the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following weighted-average assumptions:

 

 

The expected volatility assumption was derived by referring to changes in the Company’s historical common stock price over a timeframe similar to that of the expected life of the award.

 

The weighted average fair value of options granted during 2007 was $22.55. No options were granted during 2005 or 2006.

For periods prior to 2006, the following table illustrates the pro forma impact on net income and earnings per share as if the fair value based method had been applied on all outstanding and unvested awards in the period:

 

 

The following table summarizes stock-based award activity during the year ended December 31, 2007:

 

 

The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 was $8,400 and $6,300, respectively. Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options, exclusive of income tax benefits, were $1,500, $1,600, and $1,000 for the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Income tax benefits of $3,200, $2,400 and $653 were realized from stock option exercises during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005, respectively. The fair value of options vested during the years ended December 31, 2007, 2006 and 2005 totaled $150, $146 and $320, respectively.

 

 

At the Annual Meeting of Shareholders held on April 27, 2007, the shareholders of the Company approved the Olympic Steel 2007 Omnibus Incentive Plan (the Plan). The Plan authorizes the Company to grant stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted shares, restricted share units, performance shares, and other stock- and cash-based awards to employees and Directors of, and consultants to, the Company and its affiliates. Under the Plan, 500,000 shares of common stock are available for equity grants.

 

On May 1, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors approved the grant of 1,800 restricted stock units (RSUs) to each non-employee director. Subject to the terms of the Plan and the RSU agreement, the RSUs vested on January 1, 2008. The RSUs are not converted into shares of common stock until the director either resigns or is terminated from the Board of Directors.

On May 1, 2007, the Compensation Committee of the Company’s Board of Directors also granted 32,378 performance-earned restricted stock units (PERSUs) to the senior management of the Company. The PERSUs may be earned based on the Company’s performance over a 32-month period, beginning May 1, 2007, and will be converted into shares of common stock in 2010, based on the achievement of two separate financial measures: (1) the Company’s EBITDA (50% weighted); and (2) return on invested capital (50% weighted). No shares will be earned unless the threshold amounts for the performance measures are met. Up to 150% of the targeted amount of PERSUs may be earned.

 

The following table summarizes the activity related to RSUs and PERSUs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2007: