OMNIQ Corp. - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)

U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended: September 30, 2015

QUEST SOLUTION, INC.

(Exact name of small business issuer as specified in its charter)

860 Conger Street, Eugene, OR 97402

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(541) 284-1476

(Issuer’s telephone number)

2580 Anthem Village Dr., Henderson, NV 89052

(Former Name or Former Address, If Changed Since Last Report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the past 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES [X] NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES [X] NO [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) YES [  ] NO [X]

APPLICABLE ONLY TO CORPORATE ISSUERS

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 38,001,478 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value, as of November 11, 2015.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). All statements other than statements of historical facts included or incorporated by reference in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including without limitation, statements regarding our future financial position, business strategy, budgets, projected revenues, projected costs and plans and objectives of management for future operations, are forward-looking statements. In addition, forward-looking statements generally can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology such as “may,” “will,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “projects,” “estimates,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “contemplates,” “targets,” “could,” “would” or “should” or the negative thereof or any variation thereon or similar terminology or expressions. Management cautions readers not to place undue reliance on any of the Company’s forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date made.

We have based these forward-looking statements on our current expectations and projections about future events. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees and are subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and assumptions about us that may cause our actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. Important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from our expectations include, but are not limited to: our ability to raise additional capital, the absence of any operating history or revenue, our ability to attract and retain qualified personnel, our ability to develop and introduce a new service and products to the market in a timely manner, market acceptance of our services and products, our limited experience in the industry, the ability to successfully develop licensing programs and generate business, rapid technological change in relevant markets, unexpected network interruptions or security breaches, changes in demand for current and future intellectual property rights, legislative, regulatory and competitive developments, intense competition with larger companies, general economic conditions, and other risks discussed in this filing, the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”), and the Company’s other filings with the SEC.

All subsequent written and oral forward-looking statements attributable to us, or persons acting on our behalf, are expressly qualified in their entirety by the foregoing. The Company has no obligation to and does not undertake to update, revise, or correct any of these forward-looking statements after the date of this report.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

QUEST SOLUTION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited notes to the financials should be read in conjunction with these condensed

consolidated financial statements.

QUEST SOLUTION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited notes to the financials should be read in conjunction with these condensed

consolidated financial statements.

QUEST SOLUTION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

The accompanying unaudited notes to the financials should be read in conjunction with these financial statements.

QUEST SOLUTION, INC

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)

NOTE 1 – BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The interim consolidated financial statements of Quest Solution, Inc. includes the combined accounts of Quest Marketing, Inc., an Oregon corporation (“QMI”), and Bar Code Specialties, Inc., a California corporation (“BCS”). BCS was acquired on November 21, 2014, and the operating results of BCS have been consolidated into the Company’s consolidated results of operations beginning on November 22, 2014. Quest Solution, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries currently operate as a single business unit under the Quest Solution brand. All material intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated in consolidation. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this report to “Quest Solution, Inc.,” “Quest Solution,” or “Quest” refer only to Quest Solution, Inc., a Delaware corporation, and not to any of its consolidated subsidiaries. Unless the context otherwise requires, all references in this report to “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company” refer collectively to Quest Solution, Inc., together with its consolidated subsidiaries, including QMI and BCS.

The interim consolidated financial statements included herein, presented in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) and stated in US dollars, have been prepared by the Company, without audit, pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC. Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP have been condensed or omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes that the disclosures are adequate to make the information presented not misleading.

These statements reflect all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring adjustments, which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for fair presentation of the information contained therein. It is suggested that these interim financial statements be read in conjunction with the financial statements of the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014 and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on April 9, 2015. The Company follows the same accounting policies in the preparation of interim reports.

Operating results for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ended December 31, 2015.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

This summary of significant accounting policies of Company is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management who are responsible for the integrity and objectivity of the financial statements. These accounting policies conform to GAAP and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

Cash

Cash consists of petty cash, checking, savings, and money market accounts. For the purpose of the statements of cash flows, all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less are considered to be cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.

The Company maintains its cash in bank deposit accounts which, at times, may exceed federal insured limits.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Certain accounting policies involve judgments and uncertainties to such an extent that there is reasonable likelihood that materially different amounts could have been reported under different conditions, or if different assumptions had been used. The Company evaluates its estimates and assumptions on a regular basis. The Company uses historical experience and various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances to form the basis for making judgments about carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may materially differ from these estimates and assumptions used in preparation of the consolidated financial statements.

PURCHASE ACCOUNTING AND BUSINESS COMBINATIONS

The Company accounts for its business combinations using the purchase method of accounting which requires that intangible assets be recognized apart from goodwill if they are contractual in nature or separately identifiable. Acquisitions are measured on the fair value of consideration exchanged and, if the consideration given is not cash, measurement is based on the fair value of the consideration given or the fair value of the assets acquired, whichever is more reliably measurable. The excess of cost of an acquired entity over the fair value of identifiable acquired assets and liabilities assumed is allocated to goodwill.

The valuation and allocation process relies on significant assumptions made by management. In certain situations, the allocations of excess purchase price are based upon preliminary estimates and assumptions. Accordingly, the allocations are subject to revision when the Company receives updated information, including appraisals and other analyses, which are completed within one year of the acquisition. Revisions to the fair values, which may be significant, are recorded when pending information is finalized, within one year from the acquisition date.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Accounts receivable are carried at their estimated collectible amounts. The Company provides allowances for uncollectible accounts receivable equal to the estimated collection losses that will be incurred in collection of all receivables. Accounts receivable are periodically evaluated for collectability based on past credit history with customers and their current financial condition. The Company’s management determines which accounts are past due and if deemed uncollectible, the Company charges off the receivable in the period the determination is made. The Company generally requires no collateral to secure its ordinary accounts receivable. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, accounts receivable 90 days past due totaled $78,624 and $118,913, respectively. Based on management’s evaluation, accounts receivable has a balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts of $20,249, and $62,800 for the period ending September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at purchased cost and depreciated using both straight-line and accelerated methods over estimated useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years. Upon disposition of property and equipment, related gains and losses are recorded in the results of operations. Depreciation expense for period ending September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $57,264 and $8,523, respectively. For federal income tax purposes, depreciation is computed using the modified accelerated cost recovery system. Expenditures for major renewals and betterments that extend the useful lives of property and equipment are capitalized. Expenditures for maintenance and repairs are charged to expenses as incurred.

INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Intangible assets are stated at cost, net of accumulated amortization. The intangible assets are being amortized on the straight-line method over useful lives ranging from 3 to 10 years. Amortization expense for the period ending September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 was $12,652 and $9,376, respectively.

On August 27, 2015, Quest Solution entered into an Omnibus Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement”) with its former President, Kurt Thomet (“Thomet”) reducing Intangible License asset by $450,000. Included in this agreement was the assignment of license rights to Mr. Thomet that were previously acquired for $450,000 from Rampart Systems. Further details can be found in Note 10.

There are no expected amortization expenses going forward.

The Company has made a significant investment in software over the years. This amount is treated as intangible assets which are being amortized over the expected useful life. Intangible assets are evaluated annually for potential impairment.

Purchased intangible assets with finite useful lives are amortized over their respective estimated useful lives (using an accelerated method for customer relationships and trade names) to their estimated residual values, if any. The Company’s finite-lived intangible assets consist of customer relationships, contractor and resume databases, trade names, and internal use software and are being amortized over periods ranging from two to nine years. Purchased intangible assets are reviewed annually to determine if facts and circumstances indicate that the useful life is shorter than originally estimated or that the carrying amount of assets may not be recoverable. If such facts and circumstances exist, recoverability is assessed by comparing the projected undiscounted net cash flows associated with the related asset or group of assets over their remaining lives against their respective carrying amounts. Impairments, if any, are based on the excess of the carrying amount over the fair value of those assets. If the useful life is shorter than originally estimated, the rate of amortization is accelerated and the remaining carrying value is amortized over the new shorter useful life. No impairments were identified or changes to estimated useful lives have been recorded.

DEFERRED FINANCING COSTS

Deferred Financing Costs incurred by the Company in connection with the issuance of debt and the bank credit facility are deferred and amortized to interest expense over the life of the underlying indebtedness using the straight line method.

SHIPPING AND HANDLING COSTS

The Company classifies shipping and handling costs for purchases of raw materials and freight out net of freight charged to customers as a component of cost of goods sold. Total delivery costs for the three months ending September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 were $29,637 and $11,298, respectively. Total delivery costs for the nine months ending September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 were $84,968 and $11,881, respectively.

ADVERTISING

The Company generally expenses advertising costs as incurred, net of co-operative rebates. Total advertising costs for the three months ending September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 were $5,166 and $7,338, respectively. Total advertising costs for the nine months ending September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 were $150,689 and $124,745, respectively.

INVENTORY

Substantially all inventory consists of raw materials and finished goods and are valued based upon first-in first-out (“FIFO”) cost, not in excess of market. The determination of whether the carrying amount of inventory requires a write-down is based on a detailed evaluation of inventory relative to any potential slow moving products or discontinued items as well as the market conditions for the specific inventory items.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

Depreciation and amortization expense primarily consists of the non-cash write-down of tangible and intangible assets over their expected economic lives. We expect this expense to continue to grow in absolute dollars and potentially as a percentage of revenue as we continue to grow and incur capital expenditures to improve our technological infrastructure and acquire assets through potential future acquisitions.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company’s financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and notes payable. All instruments are accounted for on a historical cost basis, which, due to the short maturity of these financial instruments, approximates fair value at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. The Company did not engage in any transaction involving derivative instruments.

As required by the Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures Topic of the FASB ASC, fair value is measured based on a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows: (Level 1) observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; (Level 2) inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets, that are observable either directly or indirectly; and (Level 3) unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.

The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are described below:

Level 1: Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;

Level 2: Quoted prices in markets that are not active, or inputs which are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;

Level 3: Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market activity).

REVENUE RECOGNITION

Recurring technology, deferred maintenance service agreements and contract service revenue consists of subscription-based fees, software subscription license fees, software maintenance fees and hosting fees related to the use of our solution to manage our customers’ communications expenses, as well as fees for perpetual software licenses, professional services and products sold.

We recognize revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, pricing is fixed and determinable, collection is reasonably assured and delivery or performance of service has occurred. Recurring technology and services subscription-based fees, software subscription license fees, software maintenance fees and hosting fees are recognized ratably over the term of the period of service. The subscription-based services we provide include help desk, staging, carrier activations and provisioning.

Sales revenue is recognized upon the shipment of merchandise to customers. The Company recognizes revenues from software sales when software products are shipped.

Software license fees consist of fees paid for a perpetual license agreement for our technology, which are recognized in accordance with Financial Accounting Standards Board, or FASB, Accounting Standards Codification, or ASC 605, Software Revenue Recognition, as amended.

Professional services related to the implementation of our software products, which we refer to as consulting services, are generally performed on a fixed fee basis under separate service arrangements. Consulting services revenue is recognized as the services are performed by measuring progress towards completion based upon either costs or the achievement of certain milestones.

NET INCOME (LOSS) PER COMMON SHARE

Net loss per share is provided in accordance with FASB ASC 260-10, “Earnings per Share.” Basic net loss per common share (“EPS”) is computed by dividing income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings per share is computed by dividing net income by the weighted average shares outstanding, assuming all dilutive potential common shares were issued, unless doing so is anti-dilutive. The weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for computing basic EPS as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 were 35,702,188 and 33,362,776, respectively.

The fully diluted number of 39,630,570, includes the potential of the existing senior subordinated debt holders converting a portion of their debt into common stockholder equity at $1.00 per share (for $1,594,000 in debt) and $2.00 per share (for $1,962,382 in debt). Despite the fact the conversion is “out of the money”, accounting rules require these amounts to be included in diluted shares outstanding. Additional terms of the debt would require the board of directors of Quest Solution (the “Board”) to consent to any debt holder converting and having a position greater than 4.99% outstanding on the date of conversion.

GOODWILL

Goodwill is the excess of the purchase price paid over the fair value of the net assets of the acquired business. Goodwill is tested annually at December 31 for impairment. The annual qualitative or quantitative assessments involve determining an estimate of the fair value of reporting units in order to evaluate whether an impairment of the current carrying amount of goodwill exists. A qualitative assessment evaluates whether it is more likely than not that a reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying amount before applying the two-step quantitative goodwill impairment test. The first step of a quantitative goodwill impairment test compares the fair value of the reporting unit to its carrying amount including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds its fair value, an impairment loss may be recognized. The amount of impairment loss is determined by comparing the implied fair value of reporting unit goodwill with the carrying amount. If the carrying amount exceeds the implied fair value then an impairment loss is recognized equal to that excess. No impairment charges have been recorded as a result of the Company’s annual impairment assessments.

We test our goodwill and other indefinite-lived intangible assets for impairment annually, or, under certain circumstances, more frequently, such as when events or circumstances indicate there may be impairment. We are required to write down the value of goodwill only when our testing determines the recorded amount of goodwill exceeds the fair value. Our annual measurement date for testing goodwill impairment is December 31, at which date we test our reporting units, which is currently our ownership in Quest Solution, Inc.

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for its income taxes in accordance with Income Taxes Topic of the FASB ASC 740, which requires recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases and tax credit carry forwards. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in operations in the period that includes the enactment date.

Income tax expense is based on reported earnings before income taxes. Deferred income taxes reflect the impact of temporary differences between assets and liabilities recognized for consolidated financial reporting purposes and such amounts recognized for tax purposes, and are measured by applying enacted tax rates in effect in years in which the differences are expected to reverse.

The Company also follows the guidance related to accounting for income tax uncertainties. In accounting for uncertainty in income taxes, the Company recognizes the financial statement benefit of a tax position only after determining that the relevant tax authority would more likely than not sustain the position following an audit. For tax positions meeting the more likely than not threshold, the amount recognized in the financial statements is the largest benefit that has a greater than 50% likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement with the relevant tax authority.

The Company has evaluated the deferred income taxes with regards to Section 382 of the Internal Revenue Code and has determined no limitations on the use of net operating loss carryforwards exist at September 30, 2015.

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

The Company recognizes stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC Topic 718 “Stock Compensation”, which requires the measurement and recognition of compensation expense for all share-based payment awards made to employees and directors including employee stock options and employee stock purchases related to an Employee Stock Purchase Plan based on the estimated fair values.

For non-employee stock-based compensation, we have adopted ASC Topic 505 “Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees”, which requires stock-based compensation related to non-employees to be accounted for based on the fair value of the related stock or options or the fair value of the services on the grant date, whichever is more readily determinable in accordance with ASC Topic 718.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Company has evaluated the recent pronouncements and believes that none of them will have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements.

NOTE 2 – CONCENTRATIONS

Financial instruments that potentially subject the Company to a concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, accounts receivable, and accounts payable. Beginning January 1, 2015, all of our cash balances were insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) up to $250,000 per depositor at each financial institution. This coverage is available at all FDIC member institutions. The Company uses Wells Fargo Bank, which is an FDIC insured institution. Based on these facts, collectability of bank balances appears to be adequate.

For the quarter and year ending September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, one customer accounted for 15% and another customer in 2014 accounted for 16% of the Company’s net revenues, respectively.

Accounts receivable at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014 are made up of trade receivables due from customers in the ordinary course of business. One customer made up 35% and another customer 34% of the trade accounts receivable balances at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

Accounts payable are made up of payables due to vendors in the ordinary course of business at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. One vendor made up 82% and 82%, respectively of the outstanding balance, which represented greater than 10% of accounts payable at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively.

NOTE 3 – INVENTORY

At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, inventories consisted of the following:

NOTE 4 – COST OF GOODS SOLD, RELATED PARTY

At the acquisition of QMI on January 1, 2014, there was $1,273,292 of related party prepaid expenses for business related insurance policies QMI previously maintained insurance policies with an insurance company for which the stockholders also own. The Company deemed this to be a related party and the insurance expenses paid during 2013, which was for 2014 coverage while not a cash expense for 2014, was taken as an expense from January 2014 through November 2014. The amount of expense was $1,273,292 in prepaid expenses for insurance coverage, paid in 2013, for 2014 coverage. As of January 1, 2014, the Company did not renew any of these policies now that they have expired.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded $1,041,784 of expense related to this, as opposed to $0 recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2015.

NOTE 5 – PREPAIDS

The Company currently has $936,064 and $191,498 of expenses that were prepaid as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, which we expect to expense approximately over the next 12 months. The Company issued shares of restricted Common Stock to consultants during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, for which $321,389 of the expense is in prepaid expense and to be expensed over the course of the remainder of the 12-month contracts.

NOTE 6 – OTHER LIABILITIES

In connection with the BCS acquisition on November 12, 2014, the Company assumed a related party note payable to the former Chief Technology Officer of the RFID division of BCS. The note is payable in equal monthly installments of $4,758 beginning October 31, 2014 and ending October 2018. The loan bears interest at 1.89% and is unsecured and subordinated to the Company’s bank debt.

The Company has purchased key man life insurance policies for certain executives to insure the Company against risk of loss of executive. Should loss of an executive occur, those funds would be used to settle pay off their respective promissory notes, repurchase their shares of Common Stock and settle any amounts owed to them or to their respective estates.

As of September 30, 2015, the Company balances are net per the right of offset noted in FASB No. 39 and 41. To have right of offset, the Company would need to show (1) amounts of debt are determinable, (2) reporting entity has the “right” to setoff, (3) the right is enforceable by law, and (4) reporting entity has the ‘intention’ to setoff. Given that the Company has satisfied these requirements, the Company has elected to use the right of setoff as the cash value of the policies are being used as the collateral for the loans. Should the Company default on payments to the policy or determine to not continue with the policies, the cash value of the policy is intended to pay off of the loan. The Company also intends on settling out the loans in the future with the cash value of the policy.

As of September 30, 2015, the balance of amount of premium financed notes are $1,194,074 and the cash value of the policy as of this date is $1,114,774, along with $59,540 of prepaid insurance expense costs, with a net negative cash value of the policies of $19,760.

NOTE 7 – PROFIT SHARING PLAN

QMI maintains a contributory profit sharing plan covering substantially all fulltime employees within the requirements of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”). QMI is required to make a safe harbor non-elective contribution equal to 3% of a participant’s compensation. The plan also includes a 401(k) savings plan feature that allows substantially all employees to make voluntary contributions and provides for discretionary matching contributions determined annually. QMI’s safe harbor contributions were $98,066 for 2014 and paid in 2015.

BCS also has a safe harbor plan within the requirements of ERISA that provides matching contributions equal to 100% of the employee deferred contribution up to 3% of the compensation, plus 50% of the deferred contributions that exceed 3% up to 5% of total participant compensation. The BCS matching contributions for the nine months ending September 30, 2015 were $29,300.

NOTE 8 – ACCRUED EXPENSES AND OTHER CURRENT LIABILITIES

Accrued expenses and other current liabilities consist of the following:

Deferred revenue consists of prepaid third party hardware service agreements, software maintenance service contracts and the related costs and expenses recorded net of the revenue charged to the customer and paid within normal business terms. The net amount recorded as a deferred revenue liability is being amortized into the results of operations over the related periods on a straight line basis, normally 1-5 years with 3 years being the average term.

Expected future amortization of net deferred revenue, are as follows;

The company recorded net deferred revenue of $218,619 and $158,513, for the quarters ending September 30 and June 30, 2015, respectively.

NOTE 9 – TERM DEBT / WELLS FARGO LINE OF CREDIT DETAILS

As of September 30, 2015, the Company’s outstanding balance with the Wells Fargo revolving line of credit $1,247,634. As of the date of this report, the Wells Fargo revolving line of credit is fully paid off, as further described in Note 14 herein.

Related Party

On September 24, 2015, Quest Solution issued subordinated promissory notes (the “Promissory Notes”) to three investors (who are also Quest Solution employees) in the aggregate principal amount of $400,000. In connection with this, Quest Solution issued 170,000 shares of Quest Solution’s restricted Common Stock. Promissory Notes accrue interest at six percent (6%) per annum and are payable in twelve (12) equal, monthly installments. The Promissory Notes are due on July 31, 2016.

NOTE 10 – SUBORDINATED NOTES PAYABLE

Notes and loans payable consisted of the following:

As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, the Company recorded interest expense in connection with these notes in the amount of $335,768 and $51,806, respectively.

On August 27, 2015, Quest Solution entered into a Settlement Agreement with Thomet. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, Quest Solution was required to pay Thomet $7,036,000.00 as full satisfaction for two (2) promissory notes held by Thomet by September 30, 2015. Included in this agreement (and deducted from the $7.036 million settlement) was the assignment of license rights to Thomet with an assigned value of $1.15 million. The licenses were previously acquired for $450,000 from Rampart Systems. Thomet shall pay Quest Solution a royalty fee of 3.5% of revenue related to the “gun-barrel,” “rebar inspection,” and “air frame” licenses for a five (5) year period, beginning on the effective date of the Assignment Agreement (as defined in the Settlement Agreement). The parties agreed to exclude the existing mining distribution license from the royalties to be paid to Quest Solution by Thomet. On October 19, 2015, Quest Solution and Thomet entered into that certain First Amendment to the Omnibus Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement Amendment”), which modified the payment schedule under the Settlement Agreement. The foregoing description of the material terms of each of the Settlement Agreement and Settlement Agreement Amendment are not complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of such agreements, which are filed as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on September 3, 2015, and Exhibit 10.9 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 10, 2015.

On September 28, 2015, the Company entered into that certain Notice and Offer of Settlement under an Amended and Restated Secured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note (the “Zicman Settlement Agreement”) with George Zicman, an investor and employee of the Company (“Zicman”), pursuant to which Zicman agreed to settle debt obligations with the Company of approximately $1,617,000 in exchange for (i) 1,000,000 shares of restricted common stock at $0.357 per share, (ii) a fixed payment of $50,000 per month, beginning January 15, 2016, with a balloon payment due April 15, 2017, at 1.89%, expected to be approximately $426,500, and (iii) within 30 days of the Zicman Settlement Agreement, a payment of Eighty-Four Thousand Dollars ($84,000). The foregoing description of the material terms of the Zicman Settlement Agreement is not complete and is qualified in its entirety by reference to the full text of such agreement, which is filed as Exhibit 10.10 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 10, 2015.

NOTE 11 – STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

PREFERRED STOCK

As of September 30, 2015, there were 25,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Preferred Stock”), authorized and 500,000 shares of Preferred Stock outstanding. The Board previously established the voting rights for the Preferred Stock, whereby each share of Preferred Stock entitles the holder thereof to 250 votes on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders of Quest Solution. On October 1, 2015, the Company redeemed all of the outstanding shares of Preferred Stock held by an employee of the Company, along with certain of the employee’s stock options, in exchange for a promissory note in the principal amount of $3,120,000.00. The redemption of the Preferred Stock is described more fully in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 10, 2015.

COMMON STOCK

During the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the Company issued the following shares.

On May 19, 2015, Quest entered into a Security Purchase Agreement (the “SPA”) with an accredited investor, who is also a subordinated debt holder and an employee of Quest, pursuant to which Quest issued 667,000 shares of Common Stock in exchange for $200,000.

On June 24, 2015, Quest issued subordinated promissory notes (the “Promissory Notes”) to three investors (who are also Quest employees) in the aggregate principal amount of $400,000 in exchange for an aggregate 170,000 shares of Quest’s restricted common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The company recorded an interest expense of $62,731 relative to this issuance.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2015, the company issued 650,000 shares of restricted common stock to consultants of the Company relative to a 12 month contract. The Company has the option to repurchase 550,000 of the shares issued with the 12 month period. The Company also issued 100,000 shares to the Chief Executive Officer in connection with his employment contract on May 1, 2015, the Company recorded a $288,880 expense related to the consulting contracts to be amortized over the period of these contracts.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, a stockholder of the Company voluntarily returned 2,517 shares of Common Stock, which were canceled from the Company’s issued and outstanding shares.

Quest Solution issued no shares of restricted Common Stock to consultants for services rendered to the Company during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

Related Party

As discussed in Note 10, Quest Solution agreed to redeem 900,000 shares of Common Stock from Thomet pursuant to the Settlement Agreement.

As discussed in Note 10, Quest Solution issued 1,000,000 shares of restricted Common Stock to Zicman pursuant to the Zicman Settlement Agreement valued at $357,000.

Warrants and Options

On May 1, 2015, the Company issued one Board member a total of 36,000 warrants valued at $10,320 for their service. The value of these warrants was estimated by using the Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions: exercise price of $0.43, term of 3 years; risk free interest rate of 1.04%; dividend yield of 0% and expected volatility of 104%.

During the quarter the company recognized approximately $38,624 related to the employee stock options which vested during the quarter.

On July 15, 2015, the Board, appointed W. Austin Lewis, IV to the Board to fill a vacancy on the Board.

In connection with his appointment to the Board, Mr. Lewis was granted a stock option to purchase 36,000 shares of restricted Common Stock granted at the Company’s then-current stock price, which vests over a three-year term.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the Company recognized approximately $74,533 related to the employee stock options which vested during the quarter.

During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, an employee of Quest Solution voluntarily terminated his warrants and stock options exercisable for an aggregate 1,900,000 shares of Common Stock, which warrants and stock options had been exercisable upon meeting certain milestones.

NOTE 12 – LITIGATION

As of September 30, 2015, the Company is not a party to any pending material legal proceeding. To the knowledge of management, no federal, state or local governmental agency is presently contemplating any proceeding against the Company. To the knowledge of management, no director, executive officer or affiliate of the Company, any owner of record or beneficially of more than five percent of the Company’s Common Stock is a party adverse to the Company or has a material interest adverse to the Company in any proceeding.

NOTE 13 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company leases a building in Garden Grove, California from the former owner of BCS for $9,000 per month, which is believed management believes to be the current fair market value of similar buildings in the area.

In connection with the BCS acquisition, Quest Solution has an earn out/royalty receivable from the new owners of the BCS RFID business that was sold on November 19, 2014, prior to the acquisition by Quest Solution. The maximum amount to be paid during the 4-year earn out period ending December 31, 2018 is $700,000. Payments to Quest Solution are due within 30 days of the closing of each calendar quarter and the first royalty calculation and payment is due to the company on April 30, 2015. Prior to its acquisition by Quest Solution, BCS recorded a 50% valuation reserve to the fair market value of this earn out receivable as of the acquisition date by Quest Solution. Quest Solution has not recorded or received any payments related to this earn out in 2015.

As of September 30, 2015, Quest Solution owes $67,000 to an entity controlled by the CFO for services provided to BCS prior to its acquisition by Quest Solution on November 21, 2014.

Additional related party transactions are further discussed in Notes 9, 10, and 11 to the financial statements included in this report.

NOTE 14 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

Sale of Accounts and Security Agreement

On November 6, 2015, Quest Solution’s wholly owned subsidiaries, QMI and BCS (“the sellers”) entered into that certain Sale of Accounts and Security Agreement (the “SAS Agreement”) with Faunus Group International, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“FGI”), to establish a sale of accounts facility (the “FGI Facility”), whereby Sellers may offer to sell their accounts receivable to FGI each month during the term of the SAS Agreement, up to a maximum amount outstanding at any time of Fifteen Million Dollars ($15,000,000). Performance of Sellers’ obligations under the SAS Agreement is secured by a security interest in all of Sellers’ assets.

Acquisition Agreement

The Company entered into an Acquisition Agreement (the “Acquisition Agreement”), which closed on November 6, 2015, simultaneous with the closing of the SAS Agreement with FGI, which Acquisition Agreement is effective as of October 1, 2015, among the Company, Quest Exchange, Ltd., a Canadian corporation and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Quest Exchange”), Viascan Group, Inc., a Canadian corporation (“Viascan Group”), and ViascanQData, Inc. a Canadian corporation (“ViascanQData”). Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, the Company acquired all of the issued and outstanding common shares of ViascanQData from Viascan Group, the sole stockholder of ViascanQData, in exchange for the issuance of 5,200,000 exchangeable shares of Quest Exchange, and two (2) subordinated promissory notes in the principal amounts of $1,000,000.00 and $500,000.00, respectively (as described in more detail herein). Each exchangeable share of Quest Exchange is exchangeable into one (1) share of the Company’s common stock at the election of Viascan Group or, in certain circumstances, of the Company.

Employment Agreements

Concurrent with the closing of the Acquisition Agreement, and effective as of October 1, 2015, the Company entered into Employment Agreements with the following former employees (the “Employees”) of Viascan Group (the “Employment Agreements”):

The Employment Agreements provide for a base salary for each of the Employees, in addition to one-time sign-on or performance bonuses, as well as customary confidentiality, non-solicitation, non-disparagement and cooperation provisions.

Amendment to Settlement Agreement

On August 27, 2015, the Company entered into a Settlement Agreement with Thomet. Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company was required to pay Thomet $7,036,000.00 as full satisfaction for two (2) promissory notes held by Thomet by September 30, 2015. Related to the Company’s entry into the FGI Facility and acquisition of ViascanQData, which occurred after September 30, 2015, the Company was unable to make such payments to Thomet and was required to amend the terms of the Settlement Agreement. The Settlement Agreement was previously filed with the SEC on September 3, 2015 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K.

On October 19, 2015, the Company and Thomet entered into that certain First Amendment to the Omnibus Settlement Agreement (the “Settlement Agreement Amendment”), which modified the payment schedule under the Settlement Agreement.

Wells Fargo Pay-Out

On November 5, 2015, Wells Fargo Bank, National Association (“Wells Fargo”) accepted full payment of all obligations of the Company and Sellers (together the “Borrowers”) under that certain Credit Agreement, dated December 31, 2014, as amended from time to time (the “Existing Credit Agreement”), terminated the Existing Credit Agreement and released Wells Fargo’s security interests in Sellers’ collateral. The Borrowers paid to Wells Fargo approximately $2.8 million representing payment for all unpaid principal, interest, fees, costs and expenses under the Existing Credit Agreement, as well as funds for additional reserves (the “Pay-Out Amount).

Notwithstanding the pay-out of Wells Fargo with respect to the amounts owed under the Existing Credit Agreement, Wells Fargo will continue to offer Borrowers, on an interim basis, depository account services and treasury management products. Further, Borrowers will continue to maintain in effect a letter of credit number with Wells Fargo, issued by Wells Fargo in favor of Barrington Bank & Trust Company, pursuant to the terms of the Existing Credit Agreement and any letter of credit agreement entered into between Wells Fargo and Borrowers.

Stock Repurchase and Cancellation

Under the terms of the Settlement Agreement, the Company agreed to redeem Thomet’s stock in the Company, totaling 900,000 shares, no later than December 31, 2015 for $342,000.

On October 1, 2015, the Company entered into a Stock Redemption Agreement (the “Stock Redemption Agreement”), pursuant to which the Company redeemed (i) 500,000 shares of the Company’s Series A Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Series A Preferred”), and (ii) certain stock options to purchase up to 3,400,000 shares of the Company’s Common Stock at $0.50 per share, in exchange for a promissory note in the principal amount of $3,120,000.

Amendment to Subordinated Note Agreement

On October 8, 2015, the Company entered into that certain Second Amendment to Secured Subordinated Convertible Promissory Note (the “Second Amendment”) with David Marin, an investor and employee of the Company (“Marin”), pursuant to which the Company and Marin agreed to modify the payment schedule of Marin’s secured subordinated convertible promissory note, dated November 21, 2014, in the original principal amount of $11,000,000 (the “Marin Note”). Under the terms of the Second Amendment, the Company agreed to pay to Marin $100,000 within five (5) business days’ of the signing of the Second Amendment and, upon the closing of one or more financings by the Company that raise in the aggregate $10,000,000 (not including the FGI Facility), a $1,000,000 payment toward the Marin Note. The Second Amendment further modified the payment schedule of the Marin Note, providing for Maximum Payments and True-Up Payments (as those terms are defined in the Second Amendment) to Marin, contingent upon the occurrence of the Company’s regular monthly payments. The previous agreement was based off of interest only payments and a true-up related to a pro-rata share of EBITDA, whereas the amendment has fixed payments and a true-up related to pro-rata share of Net Income.

Additions to the Board of Directors and Changes to Management

Pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, Thomas O. Miller, the Company’s then Chief Executive Officer, President and Chairman of the Board, resigned from his position as Chief Executive Officer, effective October 1, 2015. Mr. Miller will remain as the Company’s President and Chairman of the Board.

Simultaneous with the resignation of Mr. Miller as Chief Executive Officer and pursuant to the terms of the Acquisition Agreement, Gilles Gaudreault, was appointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, effective October 1, 2015.

Certificate of Designation

The Company filed a Certificate of Designation of Series B Preferred Stock with the Delaware Secretary of State on October 10, 2015, pursuant to the Board’s unanimous approval, at a meeting held on October 1, 2015, to create a series of convertible preferred stock designated as Series B Preferred Stock (the “Series B Preferred Stock”). The shares of Series B Preferred Stock shall have a par value of $0.001 per share and each shall constitute one (1) share. These shares are only being issued for purposes of facilitating the ViascanQData transaction in the amount of 5.2 million shares.

Change of Headquarters

Effective October 1, 2015, the Company changed the location of its principal executive corporate office. The Company’s new address is 860 Conger Street, Eugene, Oregon 97402.

The foregoing description of the material terms of each of the transactions described in Note 14 of this report are not complete and are qualified in their entirety by reference to the full text of and the exhibits contained in the Company’s Current Report on Form 8-K, filed with the SEC on November 10, 2015.

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Introduction

Quest Solution was incorporated in 1973. Prior to 2008, Quest Solution was involved in various unrelated business activities. Between 2008 and 2014, Quest Solution was involved in multiple businesses inclusive of an oil and gas investment company. Due to changes in market conditions, Quest Solution management determined to look for acquisitions which had positive cash flow and would provide immediate stockholder value. Quest Solution proceeded with a change in its business operations through its acquisition of QMI in January 2014 and BCS in November 2014.

Quest Solution is a national mobility systems integrator with a focus on design, delivery, deployment and support of fully integrated mobile solutions. Quest Solution takes a consultative approach by offering end to end solutions that include hardware, software, communications and full lifecycle management services. Quest Solution’s professionals simplify the integration process and deliver the solutions to its customers. Quest Solution counts Motorola, Intermec, Honeywell, Panasonic, AirWatch, Wavelink, SOTI and Zebra among its major suppliers.

In May 2014, our Board voted to receive approval from its stockholders to effect a name change from Amerigo Energy, Inc. to Quest Solution, Inc. We received the approval from a majority of our stockholders and filed an amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the State of Delaware. The name change became effective by the State of Delaware on May 30, 2014. The Company also requested a new stock symbol as a result of the name change and we assigned our new trading symbol “QUES.”

In November 2014, Quest Solution acquired BCS. BCS is a national mobility systems integrator and label manufacturer with a focus on warehouse and distribution industries. Since the combination of the two companies, we have been exploring efficiencies in all facets of the businesses and learning best practices from both executive teams.

As further discussed in Note 14 to the financial statements included in this report, Quest Solution acquired ViascanQData. ViascanQData is a national mobility systems integrator and label manufacturer with a focus on warehouse and distribution industries as well as having a strong media division selling labels and ribbons.

In October 2015, our Board voted to relocate our corporate headquarters from Henderson, Nevada to Eugene, Oregon. The relocation was effective as of November 6, 2015.

The following is a discussion of the Company’s financial condition, results of operations, financial resources and working capital. This discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with the Company’s financial statements contained in this Form 10-Q.

Overview

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Revenues

For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company generated net revenues in the amount of $16,711,339 and $9,084,462, respectively, the increase of $7,626,877 or 84% and is primarily attributable to the acquisition of BCS in November 2014 and additional Quest sales activity in the third quarter ending September 30, 2015. Third quarter net revenues of $16,711,339 represented an increase of $3,112,489 or 23% over the second quarter revenues ending June 30, 2015.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the company generated net revenues in the amount of $40,944,924 and $26,140,868, respectively, the increase of $14,804,055 or 57% is attributable to the acquisition of BCS in November 2014, as well as additional synergies and organic growth of the Company.

The Company has adopted a policy related to the monthly recurring revenue on the sale of service contracts. This amounted to approximately $803,119 of additional gross margin sold in the 3rd quarter of 2015 which will be amortized over the respective life of the service contracts. These agreements generally have a life of 1-5 years and are being recognized over the actual term of the contract.

Cost of Goods Sold

For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company recognized a total of $13,523,544 and $7,072,614, respectively, in cost of goods sold. The increase is attributable to the increased sales and the BCS acquisition in November 2014.

For the three months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded $347,261 of additional cost of goods sold-related party expense, as opposed to $0 recorded during the three months ended September, 2015. There was no related party cost of goods sold in 2015 as the Company did not renew those agreements.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the company recognized a total of $32,031,714 and $20,086,597, respectively, in cost of goods sold. The increase is attributable to the increased sales and the BCS acquisition in November 2014.

For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company recorded $1,041,784 of additional cost of goods sold-related party expense, as opposed to $0 recorded during the nine months ended September 30, 2015. There was no related party cost of goods sold in 2015 as the Company did not renew those agreements.

Operating expenses

Total operating expense for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 recognized was $2,550,609 and $1,646,504, respectively the increase is attributable to the BCS acquisition. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, the amount recognized was $8,341,119 and $5,098,778, respectively, which the increase is also attributable to the BCS acquisition.

General and administrative expenses for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014 totaled $597,269 and $222,857 during the comparable three month period. The increase is primarily the result of an increase in business activities related to the BCS acquisition as well as the reallocation of resources. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and 2014, the amount recognized was $2,507,423 and $723,447, respectively.

Salary and employee benefits for the three months ended September 30, 2015 totaled $1,704,989 as compared to $1,252,445 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase is related to the acquisition and changing leadership positions related to the BCS acquisition. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and 2014, the amount recognized was $5,137,962 and $3,895,458, respectively.

Stock based compensation for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were $131,940 as compared to $54,130 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The increase was related to the vesting of stock options. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and 2014, the amount recognized was $336,896 and $84,215, respectively.

Professional fees for the three months ended September 30, 2015 were $92,359 as compared to $110,005 for the three months ended September 30, 2014. The decrease was related to the reduction in usage of outside consultants versus personnel on staff. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and 2014, the amount recognized was $288,922 and $377,769, respectively.

Other income and expenses

Interest expense - Interest expense for the three months ended September, 2015 totaled $274,349, including $187,501 of OID discount on the Quest subordinated debt, as compared to $0 for the three months ended September, 2014. The increase is directly related to interest associated with the BCS acquisition and the OID discount charge relating to the outstanding balances on the Quest subordinated debt. For the nine months ended September, 2015, and 2014, the amount recognized was $1,012,415 and $1,375, respectively.

On August 27, 2015, Quest Solution entered into a Settlement Agreement with Thomet which resulted in a gain on sale of assets of $374,500. Further details can be found in Note 10.

Net income (loss) attributable to common stock

The Company realized a net gain of $697,356 for the three months ended September, 2015, compared to a net gain of $62,786 for the three months ended September, 2014, an increase of $634,570. The net loss for the nine months ended September, 2015 was $10,115, while for the same period in 2014 there was a net gain of $47,003, an decrease of $57,118, which is directly attributable a single large sale offset by the increase in interest expense of $1,012,415 during that same period.

Liquidity and capital resources

At September, 2015, The Company had cash in the amount of $264,943 and a working capital deficit of $8,941,337. In addition, The Company’s stockholders’ equity was $2,325,802 at September, 2015 and $1,193,512 at December 31, 2014.

The Company accumulated deficit increased from $16,742,156 at December 31, 2014 to $16,752,272 at September 30, 2015.

The Company operations resulted in net cash provided of $2,893,518 during the nine months ended September, 2015, compared to cash generated of $980,728 during the nine months ended September, 2015, an increase of $1,912,792. This is predominantly attributable to the net cash provided by increases in accounts payables offset by an increase in accounts receivable of $3,801,009, both partially attributable to Quest Solutions with the acquisition of BCS in November 2014 and better terms on our accounts payable.

Net cash used by investing activities was $396,806 for the nine months ended September, 2015, compared to net cash provided of $1,803,341 for the nine months ended September, 2014, a decrease of $2,200,147. The large decrease was attributable to the March 2014 acquisition of QMI and in the third quarter 2015 we did not have an acquisition.

Our financing activities used net cash of $2,465,510 during the nine months ended September, 2015, compared to net cash used of $1,212,672 during the nine months ended September, 2014, an increase of $1,252,838. The increase is attributable to the borrowings and payments on promissory notes during the nine months ended September, 2015.

Inflation

The Company’s results of operations have not been affected by inflation and management does not expect inflation to have a material impact on its operations in the future.

Off- Balance Sheet Arrangements

The Company currently does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not Applicable.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Our disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure information required to be disclosed by the issuer in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures as of September 30, 2015, the end of the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective.

Changes in Internal Controls

There has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the fiscal quarter covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

None.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, Quest Solution issued 36,000 stock options to a Board member as compensation for Board service.

Quest Solution issued no shares of restricted Common Stock to a consultants for service rendered to the Company during the quarter ended September 30, 2015.

See Notes 9, 10 and 14 to the financial statement of the Company included in this report for additional information regarding unregistered sales of equity securities.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

Not applicable.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

SIGNATURES

In accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant had duly this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: November 12, 2015