OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)

____________________________________________________

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.   20549

FORM 10-Q

[ x ] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

        SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the Quarterly Period ended June 30, 2008

or

[   ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE

       SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

for the transition period from ___to___

Commission File Number: 1-12043

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Canada                        

98-0080034

(State or other jurisdiction of            

(I.R.S. Employer

incorporation or organization)            

Identification No.)

P.O. Box 2015, Suite 1110

20 Eglinton Avenue West

Toronto, Ontario, Canada   M4R 1K8

(Address of principal executive offices)

(Zip Code)

416-322-1515

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

None

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.   Yes [ X ]  No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer [  ]  Accelerated filer [ X ]  Non-accelerated filer [  ]

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes [  ]  No [ X ]

The number of shares of the Company’s Class A non-voting shares and Class B voting shares (being the only classes of common stock of the Company) outstanding on July 31, 2008 was 13,240,414 and 99,680 shares, respectively.

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

INDEX

PART I

FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item. 1  Financial Statements  

(Continued on next page)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

1

2

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

(Continued on next page)

5

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

6

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

7

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements    (Unaudited)

1.    Summary of significant accounting policies

Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (”OPY") is incorporated under the laws of Canada. The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OPY and its subsidiaries (together, the “Company”). The principal subsidiaries of OPY are Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. ("Oppenheimer"), a registered broker dealer in securities, Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc. (“OAM”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Oppenheimer Investment Management Inc. (“OIM”), both registered investment advisors under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, Oppenheimer Trust Company, a limited purpose trust company chartered by the State of New Jersey to provide fiduciary services such as trust and estate administration and investment management, Evanston Financial Corporation (“Evanston”), which is engaged in mortgage brokerage and servicing, OPY Credit Corp., which offers syndication as well as trading of issued corporate loans,  and Oppenheimer Israel (OPCO) Ltd., which is engaged in offering investment services in the State of Israel as a local broker dealer.  Oppenheimer operates as Fahnestock & Co. Inc. in Latin America. Oppenheimer owns Freedom Investments, Inc. (“Freedom”), a registered broker dealer in securities, which also operates as the BUYandHOLD division of Freedom, offering on-line discount brokerage and dollar-based investing services. Oppenheimer holds a trading permit on the New York Stock Exchange, and is a member of the American Stock Exchange and several other regional exchanges in the United States.

On January 14, 2008 the Company acquired a major part of CIBC World Market Inc.'s U.S. capital markets businesses. This acquisition is being accounted for under the purchase method in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141 ("SFAS 141"), Business Combinations. See note 11.

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP). These accounting principles are set out in the notes to the Company’s consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2007 included in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year then ended, except for the adoption on January 1, 2008 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), Fair Value Measurements, and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, as set out in Note 2.

Disclosures reflected in these condensed consolidated financial statements comply in all material respects with those required pursuant to the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) with respect to quarterly financial reporting.

The condensed consolidated financial statements include all adjustments, which in the opinion of management are normal and recurring and necessary for a fair statement of the results of operations, financial position and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The nature of the Company’s business is such that the results of operations for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for a full year.

These condensed consolidated financial statements are presented in U.S. dollars.

8

2. New Accounting Pronouncements

Recently Adopted

In September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), Fair Value Measurements, which provides expanded information about the extent to which companies measure assets and liabilities at fair value, the information used to measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings. SFAS 157 applies whenever other standards require (or permit) assets or liabilities to be measured at fair value and does not expand the use of fair value in any new circumstances. In addition, SFAS 157 prohibits recognition of “block discounts” for large holdings of unrestricted financial instruments where quoted prices are readily and regularly available in an active market. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted.

On February 12, 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-2 (FAS 157-2) which delays the effective date of SFAS 157 for non financial assets and liabilities except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in the condensed consolidated financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). As a result, the Company only partially adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 on January 1, 2008. This partial adoption did not result in any transition adjustment to opening retained earnings. The full adoption of the provisions of SFAS 157 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements. See Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information on SFAS 157.

In February 2007, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115, which permits entities to choose to measure many financial instruments and certain other items at fair value.  SFAS 159 provides entities with the option to mitigate volatility in reported earnings by measuring related assets and liabilities differently without having to apply complex hedge accounting provisions.  In addition, SFAS 159 allows entities to measure eligible items at fair value at specified election dates and to report unrealized gains and losses on items for which the fair value option has been elected in earnings.  SFAS 159 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years with early adoption permitted provided that the entity also elects to apply the provisions of SFAS 157. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 159 for its loan trading portfolio effective January 1, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 159 did not result in any transition adjustment to opening retained earnings. See Note 4 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for more information on SFAS 159.

Recently Issued

In December 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 141(R), Business Combinations (“SFAS No. 141(R)”). SFAS 141(R) requires the acquiring entity in a business combination to recognize the full fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in the transaction (whether a full or partial acquisition); establishes the acquisition-date fair value as the measurement objective for all assets acquired and liabilities assumed; requires expensing of most transaction and restructuring costs; and requires the acquirer to disclose to investors and other users all of the information needed to evaluate and understand the nature and financial effect of the business combination. SFAS No. 141(R) applies to all transactions or other events in which the Company obtains control of one or more businesses, including those sometimes referred to as “true mergers” or “mergers of equals” and combinations achieved without the transfer of consideration, for example, by contract alone or through the lapse of minority veto rights. SFAS No. 141(R) applies prospectively to business combinations for which the

9

acquisition date is on or after December 1, 2009.

In December 2007, FASB issued SFAS No. 160, Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements - an amendment of ARB No. 51 (“SFAS 160”), which changes the accounting and reporting of non-controlling (or minority) interests in the consolidated financial statements. SFAS 160 requires 1) ownership interests in subsidiaries held by entities other than the parent be displayed as a separate component of equity in the consolidated statement of financial condition and separate from the parent; 2) after control is obtained, a change in ownership interests not resulting in a loss of control should be accounted for as an equity transaction; and 3) when a subsidiary is deconsolidated any retained non-controlling equity investment should be initially measured at fair value. This standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2008. The Company is evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS 160 on its financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

In February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 140-3, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions (“FSP No. 140-3”). FSP No. 140-3 requires an initial transfer of a financial asset and a repurchase financing that was entered into contemporaneously or in contemplation of the initial transfer to be evaluated as a linked transaction under SFAS No. 140 unless certain criteria are met, including that the transferred asset must be readily obtainable in the marketplace. FSP No. 140-3 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, and will be applied to transactions entered into after the date of adoption. Early adoption is prohibited. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of adopting FSP No. 140-3 on its financial condition, results of operations, and cash flows.

In March 2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities— an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures about an entity’s derivative and hedging activities, and is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008, with early application encouraged. The Company will adopt SFAS No. 161 in the first quarter of 2009. Since SFAS No. 161 requires only additional disclosures concerning derivatives and hedging activities, adoption of SFAS No. 161 is not expected to affect the Company’s financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

3. Earnings per share

Earnings per share was computed by dividing net profit (loss) by the weighted average number of Class A non-voting shares (“Class A Shares”) and Class B voting shares (“Class B Shares”) outstanding. Diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average Class A and Class B Shares outstanding and the effects of warrants issued and Class A Shares granted under share-based compensation arrangements using the treasury stock method, if dilutive.

10

11

Earnings per share has been calculated as follows:

Amounts are expressed in thousands of dollars, except share and per share amounts

(1)

As part of the consideration for the 2008 acquisition of a portion of CIBC World Markets Corp.’s  U.S. capital markets businesses, the Company issued a warrant to purchase 1 million Class A Shares of the Company at $48.62 per share exercisable five years from the January 14, 2008 acquisition date. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, the effect of the warrants is anti-dilutive.

(2)

For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, the diluted EPS computations do not include the antidilutive effect of 357,884 and 1,373,572 Class A Shares granted under share-based compensation arrangements (79,103 and 97,709, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007).

4. Financial instruments

Securities Owned and Securities Sold, But Not Yet Purchased at Fair Value

Amounts are expressed in thousands of dollars.

12

13

Securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased, consist of trading and investment securities at fair values. Included in securities owned at June 30, 2008 are corporate equities with estimated fair values of approximately $13.9 million ($15.4 million at December 31, 2007), which are related to deferred compensation liabilities to certain employees included in accrued compensation on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Also included in corporate equities in securities owned are investments with estimated fair values of approximately $3.4 million and $5.7 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, which relate to restricted shares of NYSE Group, Inc. At June 30, 2008, the Company had pledged securities owned of approximately $2.0 million ($1.3 million at December 31, 2007) as collateral to counterparties for securities loan transactions which can be sold or re-pledged.

Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value measurement hierarchy, and expands fair value measurement disclosures.  Fair value, as defined by SFAS 157, is the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.  The fair value hierarchy established by SFAS 157 prioritizes the inputs used in valuation techniques into the following three categories (highest to lowest priority):

Level 1: Observable inputs that reflect quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or      liabilities in active markets;

Level 2: Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability either directly or indirectly; and

Level 3: Unobservable inputs  

The Company’s securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased, investments, and derivative contracts (collectively referred to as “financial instruments”) are recorded at fair value and generally are classified within level 1 or level 2 within the fair value hierarchy using quoted market prices or quotes from market makers or broker-dealers.  Financial instruments classified within level 1 are valued based on quoted market prices in active markets and consist of U.S. government, federal agency, and sovereign government obligations, corporate equities, and certain money market instruments.  Level 2 financial instruments primarily consist of investment grade and high-yield corporate debt, convertible bonds, mortgage and asset-backed securities, municipal obligations, and certain money market instruments.  Financial instruments classified as Level 2 are valued based on quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets and quoted prices for identical or similar assets and liabilities in markets that are not active.  Some financial instruments are classified within Level 3 within the fair value hierarchy as observable pricing inputs are not available due to limited market activity for the asset or liability.  Such financial instruments include investments in private equity funds where the Company is general partner, less-liquid mortgage and asset-backed securities, and certain money market instruments.  

14

The Company’s assets and liabilities recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2008 have been categorized based upon the above fair value hierarchy as follows:

Amounts are expressed in thousands of dollars.

Amounts are expressed in thousands of dollars.

15

The following table presents additional information about Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis:

Amounts are expressed in thousands of dollars.

16

Amounts are expressed in thousands of dollars.

Fair Value Option

The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 159 effective January 1, 2008.  SFAS 159 provides entities the option to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each period. SFAS 159 permits the fair value option election on an instrument-by-instrument basis at initial recognition of an asset or liability or upon an event that gives rise to a new basis of accounting for that instrument. The Company has elected to apply the fair value option to its loan trading portfolio which resides in the newly formed entity, OPY Credit Corp.  Management has elected this treatment as it is consistent with the manner in which the business is managed as well the way that financial instruments in other parts of the business are recorded.  There were no loan positions held in the secondary loan trading portfolio during the six months ended June 30, 2008.

17

Derivative Activities

The Company transacts, on a limited basis, in exchange traded and over-the-counter derivatives for both trading and investment as well as for asset and liability management. The notional amounts and fair values of the Company’s derivatives at June 30, 2008 and 2007 by product were as follows:

Dollar amounts are expressed in thousands.

On September 29, 2006, the Company entered into interest rate swap transactions to hedge the interest payments associated with the floating rate Senior Secured Credit Note, which is subject to change due to changes in 3-Month LIBOR. See Note 6. These swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.  Changes in the fair value of the swap hedges are expected to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the interest payments due to changes in 3-Month LIBOR. For the six months ended June 30, 2008, the effective portion of the gain on the interest rate swaps was approximately $110.5 thousand and this amount has been recorded net of tax as other comprehensive income on the condensed consolidated statement of comprehensive income (loss).  There was no ineffective portion as at June 30, 2008. The interest rate swaps had a weighted-average fixed interest rate of 5.44% and 5.45% and a weighted-average maturity of 1.3 years and 1.6 years at June 30, 2008 and June 30, 2007, respectively.

Futures contracts represent commitments to purchase or sell securities or other commodities at a future date and at a specified price. Market risk exists with respect to these instruments. Notional or contractual amounts are used to express the volume of these transactions, and do not represent the amounts potentially subject to market risk. At June 30, 2008, the Company had 300 open short contracts for 10-year U.S. Treasury notes.

The Company has some limited trading activities in pass-through mortgage-backed securities eligible to be sold in the "to-be-announced" or TBA market.  TBAs provide for the forward or delayed delivery of the underlying instrument with settlement up to 180 days. The contractual or notional amounts related to these financial instruments reflect the volume of activity and do not reflect the amounts at risk. Unrealized gains and losses on TBAs are recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets in receivable from brokers and clearing organizations and payable to brokers and clearing organizations, respectively, and in the condensed consolidated statement of operations as principal transactions revenue.

Collateralized Transactions

The Company enters into collateralized borrowing and lending transactions in order to meet customers’ needs and earn residual interest rate spreads, obtain securities for settlement and finance trading inventory positions. Under these transactions, the Company either receives or provides collateral, including U.S. government and agencies, asset-backed, corporate debt, equity, and non-U.S. governments and agencies securities.  

18

The Company receives collateral in connection with securities borrowed transactions and customer margin loans. Under many agreements, the Company is permitted to sell or repledge the securities received (e.g., use the securities to enter into securities lending transactions, or deliver to counterparties to cover short positions).  At June 30, 2008, the fair value of securities received as collateral under securities borrowed transactions was $281.1 million of which the Company has re-pledged approximately $173.1 million under securities loaned transactions.

The Company pledges its securities owned for securities lending and to collateralize bank call loan transactions.  The carrying value of pledged securities that can be sold or re-pledged by the counterparty was $2.0 million as at June 30, 2008. The carrying value of securities owned by the Company that have been loaned or pledged to counterparties where those counterparties do not have the right to sell or re-pledge the collateral was $21.1 million as at June 30, 2008. 

The Company monitors the market value of collateral held and the market value of securities receivable from others. It is the Company's policy to request and obtain additional collateral when exposure to loss exists. In the event the counterparty is unable to meet its contractual obligation to return the securities, the Company may be exposed to off-balance sheet risk of acquiring securities at prevailing market prices.

At June 30, 2008, the Company had available collateralized and uncollateralized letters of credit of $164.4 million.

Credit Concentrations

Credit concentrations may arise from trading, investing, underwriting and financing activities and may be impacted by changes in economic, industry or political factors.  In the normal course of business, the Company may be exposed to risk in the event customers, counterparties including other brokers and dealers, issuers, banks, depositories or clearing organizations are unable to fulfill their contractual obligations.  The Company seeks to mitigate these risks by actively monitoring exposures and obtaining collateral as deemed appropriate.  Included in receivable from brokers and clearing organizations as of June 30, 2008 are receivables from four major U.S. broker-dealers totaling approximately $180.3 million. Included in deposits with clearing organizations as of June 30, 2008 is a clearing deposit with CIBC of $35.0 million.

The Company participates in Loan Syndications through the Debt Capital Markets business acquired from CIBC (see Note 11).  Through OPY Credit Corp., the Company operates as underwriting agent in leveraged financing transactions where it utilizes a warehouse facility provided by CIBC to extend financing commitments to third-party borrowers identified by the Company. The Company’s exposure under the warehouse facility is limited to 10% of the excess of the underwriting commitment provided by CIBC over CIBC’s targeted loan retention (“Excess Retention”).  Underwriting of loans pursuant to the warehouse facility is subject to joint credit approval by the Company and CIBC.  The maximum aggregate principal amount of the warehouse facility is $1.5 billion of which the Company utilized $76.8 million and had Excess Retention of $29.3 million as of June 30, 2008.  The Company recorded an unrealized loss of $362.5 thousand on exposures related to Excess Retention as of June 30, 2008.

As a result of the acquisition of the CIBC capital markets businesses (see Note 11), for a transition period, the Company has a clearing arrangement with CIBC World Markets Inc. to clear transactions relating to institutional equities trading and sales. Additionally, the Company also has clearing arrangements with Pershing LLC (foreign securities) and R.J. O’Brien & Associates (commodities).  These clearing brokers have the right to charge the Company for

19

losses that result from a client's failure to fulfill its contractual obligations. Accordingly, the Company has credit exposures with these clearing brokers. The clearing brokers can re-hypothecate the securities held on behalf of the Company. As the right to charge the Company has no maximum amount and applies to all trades executed through the clearing brokers, the Company believes there is no maximum amount assignable to this right. At June 30, 2008, the Company had recorded no liabilities with regard to this right. The Company's policy is to monitor the credit standing of the clearing brokers and banks with which it conducts business.

Variable Interest Entities (VIEs)

FASB Interpretation No. 46, as revised (“FIN 46R”), Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities, applies to certain entities in which equity investors do not have the characteristics of a controlling financial interest or do not have sufficient equity at risk for the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support from other parties. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the party that absorbs a majority of the entity’s expected losses, receives a majority of its expected residual returns or both, as a result of holding variable interests.  In its role as general partner in certain private equity funds, the Company holds variable interests in which the Company is not considered the primary beneficiary and therefore does not consolidate the entities.  The primary beneficiary in these private equity funds resides among the limited partnership interests.

5. Receivable from and payable to brokers and clearing organizations

    Dollar amounts are expressed in thousands.

20

6. Long-term debt

Dollar amounts are expressed in thousands.

(a)

On July 31, 2006, the Company issued a Senior Secured Credit Note in the amount of $125.0 million at a variable interest rate based on LIBOR with a seven-year term to a syndicate led by Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc., as agent. Minimum principal repayments equal to 0.25% per quarter are required plus prepayments of principal based on a portion of the Company’s excess cash flow, the net cash proceeds of asset sales, tax refunds over certain limits, awards over certain limits in connection with legal actions or ‘takings’, and debt issuances or other liability financings. On April 28, 2008, the Company paid down principal of $20.0 million, of which $16.3 million was due pursuant to the excess cash flow computation as of December 31, 2007 and the balance of $3.7 million was a voluntary repayment of principal, reducing its outstanding indebtedness thereunder to $63.0 million. In accordance with the Senior Secured Credit Note, the Company has provided certain covenants to the lenders with respect to the maintenance of a minimum fixed charge ratio and maximum leverage ratio driven from EBITDA and minimum net capital requirements with respect to Oppenheimer. On December 12, 2007, in contemplation of the acquisition described in Note 11, certain terms of the Senior Secured Credit Note were amended. In the Company’s view, the most restrictive of the covenants requires that the Company maintain a maximum leverage ratio of 2.0 (total long-term debt divided by EBITDA). At June 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with the covenants. The interest rate on the Senior Secured Credit Note for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 5.70%. Interest expense, as well as interest paid on a cash basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively, on the Senior Secured Credit Note was $1.3 million and $3.0 million ($2.1 million and $4.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007).  Of the $63.0 million outstanding at June 30, 2008, $11.6 million is expected to be paid within 12 months.

The obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Note are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, other than broker-dealer subsidiaries, with certain exceptions, and are collateralized by a lien on substantially all of the assets of each guarantor, including a pledge of the ownership interests in each first-tier broker-dealer subsidiary held by a guarantor, with certain exceptions.

(b) On January 14, 2008, in connection with the acquisition of the capital markets businesses acquired from CIBC, described in Note 11, the Company issued a Subordinated Note to CIBC in the amount of $100.0 million at a variable interest rate based on LIBOR which is due and payable on January 31, 2014 with interest payable on a quarterly basis. The purpose of this note is to support the capital requirements of the capital markets businesses acquired from CIBC.  In accordance with the Subordinated Note, the Company has provided certain covenants to the lenders with respect to the maintenance of a minimum fixed charge ratio and maximum leverage ratio driven from EBITDA and minimum net capital requirements with respect to Oppenheimer. In the Company’s view, the most restrictive of the covenants requires that the Company maintain a maximum leverage ratio of 2.4 (total long-term debt divided by EBITDA). At June 30, 2008,

21

the Company was in compliance with the covenants. The interest rate on the Subordinated Note for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 6.44%. Interest expense as well as interest paid on a cash basis for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 on the Subordinated Note was $1.6 million and $3.2 million, respectively.

7. Share capital

The following table reflects changes in the number of Class A Shares outstanding for the periods indicated:

8. Net capital requirements

The Company's broker dealer subsidiaries, Oppenheimer and Freedom, are subject to the uniform net capital requirements of the SEC under Rule 15c3-1 (the “Rule”). Oppenheimer computes its net capital requirements under the alternative method provided for in the Rule which requires that Oppenheimer maintain net capital equal to two percent of aggregate customer-related debit items, as defined in SEC Rule 15c3-3. At June 30, 2008, the net capital of Oppenheimer as calculated under the Rule was $187.1 million or 14.54% of Oppenheimer's aggregate debit items. This was $161.4 million in excess of the minimum required net capital. Freedom computes its net capital requirement under the basic method provided for in the Rule, which requires that Freedom maintain net capital equal to the greater of $250,000 or 6 2/3% of aggregate indebtedness, as defined. At June 30, 2008, Freedom had net capital of $7.8 million, which was $7.5 million in excess of the $250,000 required to be maintained at that date.

22

9. Related party transactions

The Company does not make loans to its officers and directors except under normal commercial terms pursuant to client margin account agreements. These loans are fully collateralized by such employee-owned securities.

10. Segment information

The table below presents information about the reported revenue and profit (loss) before income taxes of the Company for the periods noted. The Company’s segments are described in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. The Company’s business is conducted primarily in the United States.   Asset information by reportable segment is not reported, since the Company does not produce such information for internal use.

23

24

Amounts are expressed in thousands of dollars.

⁽¹⁾  Includes accrued expenses of $12.4 million and $27.7 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 for future payments of deferred incentive compensation to former CIBC employees for awards made by CIBC prior to the January 14, 2008 acquisition by the Company which will decline to $7.0 million in the fourth quarter 2008 and continue to significantly decline in subsequent periods, and

⁽²⁾  Includes transition service charges of $9.8 million and $20.6 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 to be paid to CIBC for interim support of the acquired businesses which will terminate upon the transition of such businesses to Oppenheimer’s platform which is anticipated in the third quarter of 2008, resulting in substantially reduced costs.

11. Acquisition

On January 14, 2008, the Company acquired CIBC World Markets Corp.’s U.S. Investment Banking, Corporate Syndicate, Institutional Sales and Trading, Equity Research, Options Trading and a portion of the Debt Capital Markets business which includes Convertible Bond Trading, Loan Syndication and Trading, High Yield Origination and Trading as well as Oppenheimer Israel (OPCO) Ltd., formerly CIBC Israel Ltd. (together the “New Capital Markets Business”). The New Capital Markets Business employed over 600 people at acquisition. Per the terms of the purchase agreement, the operating results of the New Capital Markets Business for the period January 1, 2008 to January 14, 2008 were transferred and assumed by the Company. The newly acquired businesses (including operating results related to businesses to be acquired in the UK and Asia) along with the Company’s existing Investment Banking, Corporate Syndicate, Institutional Sales and Trading and Equities Research divisions were combined to form the Oppenheimer Investment Banking Division (OIB Division) within the Capital Markets business segment. The acquisition of related operations in Asia and the UK is expected to close in 2008, subject to regulatory approval.

The acquisition is being accounted for under the purchase method in accordance with SFAS 141, which requires the acquiring entity to allocate the cost of an acquired business to the assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values as at the date of acquisition. Consideration paid in cash is measured based on the amount of cash paid, while non-cash consideration is recorded at estimated fair value.

25

The purchase price for the transaction is comprised of (1) an earn-out based on the annual performance of the OIB Division for the calendar years 2008 through 2012 (in no case to be less than $5 million per year) to be paid in the first quarter of 2013 (the “Earn-Out Date”). On the Earn-Out Date, 25% of the earn-out will be paid in cash and the balance may be paid, at the Company’s option, in any combination of cash, the Company’s Class A Shares (at the then prevailing market price) and/or debentures to be issued by the Company payable in two equal tranches – 50% one year after the Earn-Out Date and the balance two years after the Earn-Out Date, (2) warrants to purchase 1,000,000 Class A Shares of the Company at $48.62 per share exercisable five years from the January 2008 closing, (3) consideration at closing equal to the fair market value of net securities owned in the amount of $48.2 million, (4) cash consideration at closing in the amount of $2.7 million for office facilities, (5) a cash payment at closing in the amount of $1.1 million to extinguish a demand note, and (6) cash paid to cover acquisition costs of $1.8 million.

Amounts are expressed in thousands of dollars.

The following table summarizes the estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed.

All fair values are preliminary and subject to change as additional information as of the acquisition date becomes available.

Amounts are expressed in thousands of dollars.

26

Intangible assets arose upon the acquisition of the New Capital Markets Business and are comprised of customer relationships and the estimated fair value of a below-market lease on the premises located at 300 Madison Avenue in New York City. Customer relationships are carried at $911.8 thousand (which is net of accumulated amortization of $29.2 thousand) at June 30, 2008 and are being amortized on a straight-line basis over 180 months commencing in January 2008.  The below-market lease, which represents the difference between what the Company is paying to occupy the premises at 300 Madison Avenue and the fair market value of comparable real estate in midtown Manhattan, is carried at $19.1 million (which is net of accumulated amortization of $2.2 million) at June 30, 2008 and is being amortized over the life of the lease (60 months commencing in January 2008).

The earn-out, which will amount to no less than $25.0 million, has been assigned a fair value of $11.1 million at acquisition date. The difference between the full liability and the grant date fair value is being amortized over 60 months commencing in January 2008 and approximately $696.6 thousand and $1.4 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 is included as interest expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations. If the earn-out exceeds $5.0 million in any of the five years from 2008 through 2012, the excess will first reduce the excess of fair value of acquired assets over cost and second will create goodwill, as applicable.

As part of the transaction, the Company borrowed $100.0 million from CIBC in the form of a five-year Subordinated Note to support the New Capital Markets Business. In addition, CIBC is providing a warehouse facility, initially up to $1.5 billion, to OPY Credit Corp, to extend financing commitments to third-party borrowers identified by the Company. Underwriting of loans pursuant to the warehouse facility will be subject to joint credit approval by Oppenheimer and CIBC.

In addition, in conjunction with the transaction, the Company has agreed to pay to CIBC an estimated $69.1 million over three years from 2008 through 2010 for future payments of deferred incentive compensation to former CIBC employees for awards made by CIBC prior to January 14, 2008. The Company recorded approximately $12.4 million and $27.7 million, respectively, of such expense in the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 ($10.0 million is included in compensation and related expenses and $2.4 million is included in interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2008; $21.9 million is included in compensation and related expenses and $5.8 million is included in interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2008). In excess of 50% of the expense accruals for these amounts fall in the first three quarters of 2008. The actual cash payments required, however, fall more evenly over the three year period. The estimated amounts are based on forfeiture assumptions and actual amounts may differ from these estimates.

The Company is incurring transition service charges to be paid to CIBC for interim support of the New Capital Markets Business which will terminate upon transition of such businesses to the Company’s platform, which is expected to occur in the third quarter of 2008. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, transition service charges were $9.8 million and $20.6 million, respectively, included in other expenses in the condensed consolidated statement of operations.

Presented below are pro forma consolidated results of operations. Amounts presented give effect to the acquisition of the New Capital Markets Business as if the transaction was consummated as at January 1, 2007. The Company’s actual results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 include the results of the New Capital Markets Business since January 1, 2008.

27

The pro forma information is for comparative purposes only and is not indicative either of the actual results that would have occurred if the acquisition had been consummated at the beginning of the periods presented, or of future operations of the combined companies. CIBC has an October 31^st fiscal year end and, therefore, the financial information for the New Capital Markets Business relates to the three and six months ended April 30, 2007. Revenue and expenses included in the pro forma presentation for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 include certain CIBC corporate allocations, reflecting the manner in which this business was managed within CIBC. Such allocations may distort the comparability of the information presented below.

Dollar amounts are expressed in thousands, except per share amounts.

12. Subsequent events

28

On July 30, 2008, a cash dividend of U.S. $0.11 per share (totaling $1.5 million) was declared payable on August 29, 2008 to Class A and Class B shareholders of record on August 15, 2008.

29

Item 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations  

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Reference is also made to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto found in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

The Company engages in a broad range of activities in the securities industry, including retail securities brokerage, institutional sales and trading, investment banking (both corporate and public), research, market-making, and investment advisory and asset management services. Its principal subsidiaries are Oppenheimer and OAM. As at June 30, 2008, the Company provided its services from 86 offices in 21 states located throughout the United States, one office in Israel and conducted business in two offices in Latin America through local broker-dealers. Client assets entrusted to the Company as at June 30, 2008 totaled approximately $59.6 billion. The Company provides investment advisory services through OAM and OIM and Oppenheimer’s Fahnestock Asset Management and OMEGA Group divisions. The Company provides trust services and products through Oppenheimer Trust Company. The Company provides discount brokerage services through Freedom and through BUYandHOLD, a division of Freedom. Through OPY Credit Corp., the Company offers syndication as well as trading of issued corporate loans. Evanston is engaged in mortgage brokerage and servicing.  At June 30, 2008, client assets under management by the asset management groups totaled $16.4 billion, which includes approximately $13.9 billion under the Company’s fee-based programs. At June 30, 2008, the Company employed over 3,300 people full time, of whom approximately 2,277 were registered personnel, including approximately 1,319 financial advisors.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Company’s accounting policies are essential to understanding and interpreting the financial results reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements are summarized in notes 1 and 2 to the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements and notes thereto found in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. Certain of those policies are considered to be particularly important to the presentation of the Company’s financial results because they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, often as a result of matters that are inherently uncertain.

During the six months ended June 30, 2008, there were no other material changes to matters discussed under the heading “Critical Accounting Policies” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007,

30

except for the adoption on January 1, 2008 of Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 157 (“SFAS 157”), Fair Value Measurements and Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 159 (“SFAS 159”), The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115 as set out in Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Business Environment

The securities industry is directly affected by general economic and market conditions, including fluctuations in volume and price levels of securities and changes in interest rates, inflation, political events, investor participation levels, legal and regulatory, accounting, tax and compliance requirements and competition, all of which have an impact on commissions, firm trading, fees from

31

accounts under investment management  as well as fees for investment banking services, and investment income as well as on liquidity. Substantial fluctuations can occur in revenues and net income due to these and other factors.

The three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were marked by an extremely volatile market environment, with investors focused on record high oil and food prices, a weak U.S. dollar, liquidity problems in the credit markets and wide-spread asset write-downs. The U.S. economy appears to be in a recession brought on by the uncertainties mentioned above.  Intervention by the U.S. Treasury and the U.S. Federal Reserve in the credit markets through their support of investment banks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac will hopefully continue to bolster confidence to offset the severe decline in housing prices and shorten the time to economic recovery.

Interest rate changes impact the Company’s fixed income businesses as well as its cost of borrowed funds. As a result of the Federal Reserve’s reductions in the discount rate, average interest rates were lower for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007. Investor interest in fixed income securities is driven by attractiveness of published rates, the direction of rates, credit issues and economic expectations. Volatility in bond prices also impacts opportunities for profits in fixed income proprietary trading. Management constantly monitors its exposure to interest rate fluctuations to mitigate risk of loss in volatile environments.

During the six months ended June 30, 2008, major disruptions in the credit markets and in the credit default swap (“CDS”) market caused banks and dealers to question their open contractual relationships with counter-parties. As a result, one of the major participants in the CDS and MBS markets was faced with bankruptcy and was “rescued” by another leading financial institution with the significant assistance of the Federal Reserve. This event, as well as significant asset write-downs by financial institutions and questions regarding future such write-downs of carried assets, has caused significant restrictions in relationships among banks and dealers and is likely to be felt for several quarters to come. It is anticipated that this and other issues will continue to affect the health and activity levels in the leveraged loan market and thus affect merger and acquisition activity, and security issuance and significantly hamper investment banking activity and thus negatively impact the business of the Company and its recent acquisition described below.

As previously reported, the Company acquired a major part of CIBC World Markets’ U.S. Capital Markets Businesses on January 14, 2008, including U.S. Investment Banking, Corporate Syndicate, Institutional Sales and Trading, Equity Research, Options Trading, Convertible Bond Trading, Loan Syndication, High Yield Origination and Trading as well as related Israeli equities business (the “New Capital Markets Business”).  Per the terms of the purchase agreement, the results of the newly acquired businesses for the period January 1, 2008 to January 14, 2008 were transferred and assumed by the Company. The newly acquired businesses (including the operating results related to businesses to be acquired in the UK and Asia) along with the Company’s existing Investment Banking, Corporate Syndicate, Institutional Sales and Trading and Equities Research divisions were combined to form the Oppenheimer Investment Banking Division (OIB Division) within the Capital Markets business segment. As previously reported, the results of the OIB Division will be tracked for the five years following the acquisition for purposes of determining payments due to CIBC as part of the purchase price. See Note 11.

As previously reported, the Company is not involved in the sub-prime mortgage business, and does not have any exposure to that business as a result of its recent acquisition or otherwise.

32

For a number of years, the Company has offered Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”) to its clients as an alternative to money market investments. A significant portion of the market in auction rate has

33

‘failed’ because, in the current tight credit market, the dealers are no longer willing or able to purchase the imbalance between supply and demand for auction rate securities. These securities have auctions scheduled on either a 7, 28 or 35 day cycle. It is unclear at present whether these auctions will fail going forward. Clients of the Company own a significant amount of ARS in their individual accounts. The absence of a liquid market for these securities presents a significant problem to clients and as a result to the Company. It should be noted that this is a failure of liquidity and not a default. These securities have not failed to pay interest or principal when due. These securities are fully collateralized for the most part and remain good credits. The Company has not acted as an agent for auction rate securities nor does it have a significant exposure in its proprietary accounts. Recently, some of these auction rate securities have been redeemed at par (100% of issue value) plus accrued dividend thus reducing the scope of the issue for clients and the Company. There is no way to predict the pace of future redemptions or whether all of these securities will be redeemed by their issuers.

The Company is focused on growing its private client and asset management businesses through strategic additions of experienced financial advisors in its existing branch system and employment of experienced money management personnel in its asset management business. In addition, the Company is committed to the improvement of its technology capability to support client service and the expansion of its capital markets capabilities.

 Regulatory Environment

The brokerage business is subject to regulation by the SEC, FINRA (formerly the NYSE and NASD) and various state securities regulators. Events in recent years surrounding corporate accounting and other activities leading to investor losses resulted in the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and have caused increased regulation of public companies. New regulations and new interpretations and enforcement of existing regulations are creating increased costs of compliance and increased investment in systems and procedures to comply with these more complex and onerous requirements. Increasingly, the various states are imposing their own regulations that make the uniformity of regulation a thing of the past, and make compliance more difficult and more expensive to monitor. This regulatory environment has resulted in increased costs of compliance with rules and regulations, in particular, the impact of the rules and requirements that were created by the passage of the Patriot Act, and the anti-money laundering regulations (AML) that are related thereto. The expectation is that the increased costs of compliance in today’s regulatory environment are not temporary.

Pursuant to NASD (Rule 3013) and NYSE (Rule 342), the chief executive officers (“CEOs”) of regulated broker-dealers (including the CEO of Oppenheimer) are required to certify that their companies have processes in place to establish and test policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with federal securities laws and regulations, including applicable regulations of self-regulatory organizations. The CEO of the Company is required to make such a certification on an annual basis and did so on March 27, 2008.

Other Regulatory Matters

On July 30, 2008, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) issued a Notice of Acceptance accepting a settlement of the previously reported investigation into Oppenheimer’s securities lending practices.  The investigation concerned Oppenheimer’s supervision of its securities lending activities including, but not limited to, failing to detect and prevent stock loan personnel from engaging in business dealings with finders in violation of Oppenheimer policy.Pursuant to the Notice of Acceptance, Oppenheimer, without admitting or denying any allegations, agreed to a censure and the payment of a fine in the amount of $100,000.

34

On April 17, 2008, Oppenheimer received an invitation from the SEC to make a “Wells Submission” with respect to its activities as a broker-dealer in connection with Oppenheimer’s supervision of a former retail financial advisor’s dealings with a single institutional customer and the commissions earned with respect thereto.  The Company believes that the activity alleged was not inappropriate and that the customer was a sophisticated institution capable of evaluating commissions charged for services rendered.  Any disciplinary proceedings brought against Oppenheimer in relation to the foregoing could result in, among other things, a censure, a fine and/or the imposition of an undertaking against Oppenheimer.

Other Matters

A subsidiary of the Company was the administrative agent for two closed-end funds until December 5, 2005. The Company has been advised by the current administrative agent for these two funds that the Internal Revenue Service may file a claim for interest and penalties for one of these funds with respect to the 2004 tax year as a result of an alleged failure of such subsidiary to take certain actions. The Company will continue to monitor developments in this matter.

The Company operates in all state jurisdictions in the United States and is thus subject to regulation and enforcement under the laws and regulations of each of these jurisdictions. The Company has been and expects that it will continue to be subject to investigations and some or all of these may result in enforcement proceedings as a result of its business conducted in the various states.

As part of its ongoing business, the Company records reserves for legal expenses, judgments, fines and/or awards attributable to litigation and regulatory matters. In connection therewith, the Company has maintained its legal reserves at levels it believes will resolve outstanding matters, but may increase or decrease such reserves as matters warrant.

Business Continuity

The Company is committed to an on-going investment in its technology and communications infrastructure including extensive business continuity planning and investment. These costs are on-going and the Company believes that current and future costs will exceed historic levels due to business and regulatory requirements. This investment has increased over the last several quarters as a result of the acquisition from CIBC and the Company’s need to build out its platform to accommodate the New Capital Markets Business. The Company anticipates the acquired business will transition to the Company’s platform in the third quarter of 2008 and that expenditures to CIBC for transition services will decrease to more normal levels thereafter. The Company believes that internally-generated funds from operations are sufficient to finance its expenditure program.

Results of Operations

The Company reported net profit of $1.6 million or $0.12 per share for the second quarter of 2008, a decrease of approximately 90% in net profit compared to $15.8 million or $1.19 per share in the second quarter of 2007. Revenue for the second quarter of 2008 was $256.2 million, an increase of 13% compared to revenue of $226.8 million in the second quarter of 2007.  

The net loss for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $14.5 million or $1.07 per share compared to a net profit of $32.6 million or $2.48 per share in the first half of 2007. Revenue for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $488.1 million, an increase of 11% compared to $440.9 million for the same period in 2007.

35

36

The Company’s results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 were impacted by the current economic environment, as well as by its acquisition on January 14, 2008 of a major part of CIBC World Markets’ U.S. Capital Markets Businesses. See Note 11.

The following table and discussion summarizes the changes in the major revenue and expense categories for the periods presented (in thousands of dollars):

Revenue, other than interest

Commission revenue and, to a large extent, revenue from principal transactions depend on investor participation in the markets. Commission revenue has been impacted by a general compression in rates charged to clients for transactions as well as clients’ changing their accounts to traditional fee-based arrangements. Commissions for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased 33% and 37%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2007 primarily as a result of the acquired businesses. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, 29% and 32%, respectively, of total commissions were generated by the OIB Division’s institutional equity business. Proprietary trading results increased 60% and 42%, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007, with much of the increase attributable to the acquired businesses, although preferred and corporate trading showed significant increases in the second quarter compared to the same period of 2007. Advisory fees increased 3% and 7%, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007 primarily as a result of increased fees from external money market funds. During the period, the Company

37

introduced an FDIC insured bank sweep product that has been well accepted by clients which is expected to show increasing profitability over the next several fiscal periods. Assets under management by the asset management group decreased 5% to $16.4 billion at June 30, 2008 compared to $17.3 billion at June 30, 2007, due to declining market values. The number of client accounts under management increased 7% at June 30, 2008 compared to June 30, 2007. Included in assets under management at June 30, 2008 were approximately $13.9 billion in assets under the Company’s fee-based programs ($13.3 billion at June 30, 2007). The Company continues to focus on building its base of annuitized revenues through employee and client education and in connection with its dedication to assisting clients in their asset allocation process. Other revenue increased 3% in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and decreased 40% in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods of 2007. The primary driver of the year-to-date decline reflects the decline in the cash surrender value of Company-owned insurance policies. These policies support our deferred compensation plans.

38

Revenue for the OIB Division, approximately $70.2 million and $125.0 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, was substantially less (approximately 48% and 53%, respectively) than the comparable fiscal periods last year on a pro-forma combined basis, due to significantly reduced investment banking activity. Investment banking revenues increased 5% in the three months ended June 30, 2008 and decreased 11% in the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared with the Company’s pre-existing business during the same periods of 2007.  As previously reported, the results of the OIB Division will be tracked for the five years following the acquisition for purposes of determining payments due to CIBC as part of the purchase price.

Interest

Net interest revenue (interest revenue less interest expense) in both the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased by 58% compared to the same periods of 2007. In the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, interest revenue (which primarily relates to revenue from customer margin balances and securities lending activities) decreased by 39% compared to the same periods in 2007 due to lower interest rates. Total interest expense in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 decreased by 22% and 20%, respectively, due to lower interest rates and reduced stock loan activity but was impacted by increased interest costs associated with: (i) the $100.0 million Subordinated Note discussed above ($1.6 and $3.2 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008); (ii) interest portion of future payments of deferred incentive compensation to former CIBC employees for awards made by CIBC prior to January 14, 2008 ($2.4 and $5.8 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008); and (iii) interest portion of the earn-out ($696.7 thousand and $1.4 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008), as described in Note 11 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Expenses, other than interest

The Company’s expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased 28% and 33%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2007, primarily due to the effect of the Company’s recent acquisition. Acquisition related expenses included in compensation and related expenses of $9.7 million and $21.5 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 for future payments of deferred incentive compensation to former CIBC employees for awards made by CIBC prior to the January 14, 2008 acquisition by the Company (representing 29% and 26%, respectively, of the increase in compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007 compared to the same periods of 2007). Such payments will decline to $7.0 million in the fourth quarter 2008 and continue to significantly decline in subsequent periods. Transition service charges of $9.8 million and $20.6 million, respectively, in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 to be paid to CIBC for interim support of the acquired businesses will terminate upon the transition to Oppenheimer’s platform. This transition is anticipated in the third quarter of 2008,

39

resulting in substantially reduced costs. Compensation and related costs in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased 25% and 31%, respectively, compared to the comparable periods of 2007. The acquisition of the New Capital Markets Business has had a significant and adverse impact on compensation expense. Compensation expense was also significantly impacted by the addition of more than 500 employees who joined the Company as a result of the acquisition. Offsetting the increase in compensation expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 was the decrease in share-based compensation costs compared to the same periods in 2007 and variable compensation related to payments to financial advisors for commissions and fees earned which were lower in the current quarter than in the same period last year. Due to the decline in the market price of the Company’s Class A Shares, share-based compensation expense relating to the Company’s stock appreciation rights plan decreased $11.6 million and $11.3 million, respectively, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to the same periods in 2007.  Clearing and exchange fees in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased 109% and 113%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2007 due to higher transaction volume in 2008 because of the acquisition. The cost of communications and technology in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased by 51% and 38%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2007, reflecting the impact of the OIB Division and the need to service approximately 500 additional employees and new business lines as well as the cost of development of systems to service the new business after transition. Occupancy and equipment costs for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased by 45% and 40%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2007 due primarily to the acquisition of the OIB Division which resulted in adding new office locations and the redeployment of personnel amongst previously existing locations. Such increases in occupancy expense will decrease moderately as the Company completes its consolidation into the new facilities and relinquishes unneeded space. Other expenses in the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 increased by 42% and 64%, respectively, compared to the same periods of 2007. Transition service charges for the interim support of the OIB Division are included in other expenses and accounted for virtually all of the increase for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and represented 85% of the increase in the six months ended June 30, 2008. Transition service charges are expected to terminate during the third quarter of 2008 (with estimated savings of $2.0 million per month).  Included in other expenses, bad debt expense was flat compared to the same periods of 2007.

The Company may face additional legal costs and settlement expenses in future quarters. The Company has used its best estimate to provide adequate reserves to cover potential litigation and regulatory expenses. It is anticipated that the costs of compliance with regulations, as well as Sarbanes-Oxley Act compliance, will continue to be significant.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total assets at June 30, 2008 increased by 9% from December 31, 2007 levels. The Company satisfies its need for funds from its own cash resources, internally generated funds, collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings, consisting primarily of bank loans, and uncommitted lines of credit. The amount of Oppenheimer's bank borrowings fluctuates in response to changes in the level of the Company's securities inventories and customer margin debt, changes in stock loan balances and changes in notes receivable from employees. Oppenheimer has arrangements with banks for borrowings on an unsecured and on a fully collateralized basis. At June 30, 2008, $156.3 million of such borrowings were outstanding compared to outstanding borrowings of $29.0 million at

40

December 31, 2007. At June 30, 2008, the Company had available collateralized and uncollateralized letters of credit of $164.4 million.

In July 2006, the Company issued a Senior Secured Credit Note to a syndicate led by Morgan Stanley Senior Funding Inc., as agent, in the amount of $125.0 million. The Senior Secured Credit

41

Note has a term of seven years with minimum principal repayments of 0.25% per quarter and required prepayments based on a portion of the Company’s excess cash flow, the net cash proceeds of asset sales, tax refunds over certain limits, awards over certain limits in connection with legal actions or ‘takings’, and debt issuances or other liability financings, and pays interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR (London Interbank Offering Rate). The Company utilizes interest rate swap agreements to manage interest rate risk of its variable-rate Senior Secured Credit Note. These swaps have been designated as cash flow hedges under Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities.  Changes in the fair value of the swap hedges are expected to be highly effective in offsetting changes in the interest payments due to changes in 3-Month LIBOR. On April 28, 2008, the Company paid down principal of $20.0 million of which $16.3 million was required to be paid pursuant to the excess cash flow computation and $3.7 million represented a voluntary payment reducing its outstanding indebtedness under the Senior Secured Credit Note to $63.0 million. In accordance with the Senior Secured Credit Note, the Company has provided certain covenants to the lenders with respect to the maintenance of a minimum fixed charge ratio and maximum leverage ratio driven from EBITDA and minimum net capital requirements with respect to Oppenheimer. In the Company’s view, the most restrictive of the covenants requires that the Company maintain a maximum leverage ratio of 2.0 (total long-term debt divided by EBITDA). At June 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with the covenants. The interest rate on the Senior Secured Credit Note for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 5.70%.

The obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Note are guaranteed by certain of the Company’s subsidiaries, other than broker-dealer subsidiaries, with certain exceptions, and are secured by a lien on substantially all of the assets of each guarantor, including a pledge of the ownership interests in each first-tier broker-dealer subsidiary held by a guarantor, with certain exceptions.

On January 14, 2008, in connection with the acquisition of the New Capital Markets Business, the Company issued a Subordinated Note to CIBC in the amount of $100.0 million at a variable interest rate based on LIBOR which is due and payable on January 31, 2014 with interest payable on a quarterly basis. The purpose of this note is to support the businesses acquired from CIBC, described in Note 11.  In accordance with the Subordinated Note, the Company has provided certain covenants to the lenders with respect to the maintenance of a minimum fixed charge ratio and maximum leverage ratio driven from EBITDA and minimum net capital requirements with respect to Oppenheimer. In the Company’s view, the most restrictive of the covenants requires that the Company maintain a maximum leverage ratio of 2.4 (total long-term debt divided by EBITDA). At June 30, 2008, the Company was in compliance with the covenants. The interest rate on the Subordinated Note for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 6.44%.

In addition, CIBC is providing a warehouse facility, initially up to $1.5 billion, to OPY Credit Corp, a U.S. subsidiary formed to finance loans of middle market companies that will be syndicated and distributed by the Loan Syndication and Loan Trading Groups being acquired. Underwriting of loans pursuant to the warehouse facility will be subject to joint credit approval of Oppenheimer and CIBC. There were no loan positions held in the secondary loan trading portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

42

Funding Risk

Dollar amounts are expressed in thousands.

Management believes that funds from operations, combined with the Company's capital base and available credit facilities, are sufficient for the Company's liquidity needs in the foreseeable future. (See Factors Affecting “Forward-Looking Statements”). Recent changes in the attitudes of lenders as a result of losses and counter-party risks related to financial industry participants could make it more difficult to secure financing in the future.

Other Matters

On August 10, 2007, the Company announced its intention to purchase up to 650,000 Class A Shares using the facilities of the NYSE commencing on August 14, 2007 and terminating on August 13, 2008. All Class A Shares purchased pursuant to the Issuer Bid are cancelled. During the second quarter of 2008, the Company purchased 308,976 Class A Shares pursuant to the Issuer Bid at an average price of $30.54 per share. In accordance with its policy, the Company does not purchase its shares from the end of the fiscal quarter until after the earnings release.

43

During the second quarter of 2008, the Company issued 35,782 Class A Shares for a total consideration of $897.8 thousand related to employee share-based compensation arrangements.

On May 30, 2008, the Company paid cash dividends of U.S. $0.11 per Class A and Class B Share totaling $1.5 million from available cash on hand. These dividends are “eligible dividends” for U.S. and Canadian income tax purposes.

On July 30, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of U.S. $0.11 per Class A and Class B Share payable on August 29, 2008 to shareholders of record on August 15, 2008. These dividends are “eligible dividends” for U.S. and Canadian income tax purposes.

At June 30, 2008, shareholders’ equity was $439.4 million and book value per share was $32.94 compared to shareholders’ equity of $399 million and book value per share of $30.17 at June 30, 2007, based on total outstanding shares of 13,340,094 and 13,233,630, respectively.

The diluted weighted average number of Class A non-voting and Class B shares outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was 13,665,811 compared to 13,543,221 outstanding for the three months ended June 30, 2007, a net increase of 1%.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Information concerning the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements is included in Note 4 of the notes to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Such information is hereby incorporated by

44

reference.

Contractual and Contingent Obligations

The Company has contractual obligations to make future payments in connection with non-cancelable lease obligations and debt assumed upon the acquisition of the New Capital Markets Business as well as debt issued in 2006. The Company also has contractual obligations to make payments in connection with deferred compensation earned by former CIBC employees in connection with the acquisition as well as the earn-out to be paid in 2013 as described in Note 11 of the condensed consolidated financial statements. Such information is hereby incorporated by reference.

45

The following table sets forth these contractual and contingent commitments as at June 30, 2008.

Contractual Obligations   (In millions of dollars)    

New Accounting Pronouncements

See Note 2 to the condensed consolidated financial statements. Such information is hereby incorporated by reference.

Factors Affecting “Forward-Looking Statements”

This report contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Act”), and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). These forward-looking statements relate to anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, the results of litigation, business prospects and anticipated market performance of the Company. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, include, but are not limited to: (i) transaction volume in the securities markets, (ii) the volatility of the securities markets, (iii) fluctuations in interest rates, (iv) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost and manner of doing business, (v) fluctuations in currency rates, (vi) general economic conditions, both domestic and international, (vii) changes in the rate of inflation and the related impact on the securities markets, (viii) competition from existing financial institutions and other new participants in the securities markets, (ix) legal or

46

economic developments affecting the litigation  experience of the securities industry or the Company, (x)

47

changes in federal and state tax laws which could affect the popularity of products and services sold by the Company, (xi) the effectiveness of efforts to reduce costs and eliminate overlap, (xii) war and nuclear confrontation, (xiii) the Company’s ability to achieve its business plan and (xiv) corporate governance issues. See “Risk Factors” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007. There can be no assurance that the Company has correctly or completely identified and assessed all of the factors affecting the Company’s business. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements.

ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

During the three months ended June 30, 2008, there were no material changes to the information contained in Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, except as described in Part I, Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – under the caption “Business Environment”.

ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures pursuant to Rule 13a–15(e) of the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or its internal controls will prevent all error and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision–making can be faulty and that break-downs can occur because of a simple error or omission. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost–effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

The Company confirms that its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

On January 14, 2008, the Company acquired the New Capital Markets Business from CIBC. Excluding this acquisition, there have been no significant changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the

48

three and six months ended June 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting. Changes to certain processes, information technology systems and other components of internal control over financial reporting resulting from the acquisition of the New Capital Markets Business may occur and will be evaluated by management as such integration activities are implemented.

49

50

PART II

OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. Legal Proceedings

Many aspects of the Company’s business involve substantial risks of liability. In the normal course of business, the Company has been named as defendant or co-defendant in lawsuits creating substantial exposure. The Company is also involved in governmental and self-regulatory agency investigations and proceedings. See Regulatory Environment under Part I, Item 2. “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”. The Company and others in the financial services industry have been involved in increased incidences of litigation and regulatory investigations in recent years, including customer claims seeking, in total, substantial damages.

For information on legal matters during the period ended June 30, 2008, see Part I, Item 2, Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – under the caption “Regulatory Environment, Other Regulatory Matters”.

The Company is the subject of customer complaints, has been named as defendant or codefendant in various lawsuits seeking, in total, substantial damages and is involved in certain governmental and self-regulatory agency investigations and proceedings. These proceedings arise primarily from securities brokerage, asset management and investment banking activities. While the ultimate resolution of pending litigation and other matters cannot be currently determined, in the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the Company has no reason to believe that the resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition. However, the Company’s results of operations could be materially affected during any period if liabilities in that period differ from prior estimates. The materiality of legal matters to the Company’s future operating results depends on the level of future results of operations as well as the timing and ultimate outcome of such legal matters.

ITEM 1A. Risk Factors

During the three months ended June 30, 2008, there were no material changes to the information contained in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, except as described in Part I, Item 2 Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – under the caption “Business Environment” .

ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

During the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company repurchased 308,976 Class A Shares through the facilities of the New York Stock Exchange at an average price of $30.54 per share as follows:

51

ITEM 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders

The following discloses the voting results of the Annual Meeting of Shareholders of Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (the "Corporation") held on May 5, 2008.

ITEM 5. Other Information

None

ITEM 6. Exhibits

Exhibits

52

 SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned hereunto duly authorized, in the City of Toronto, Ontario, Canada on this 6TH day of August, 2008.

 OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

                                   By: “A.G. Lowenthal”

A.G. Lowenthal, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer

(Principal Executive Officer)

                               By:   “E.K. Roberts”

                          E.K. Roberts, President, Treasurer and Chief Financial Officer

(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)   

53

54

55

56