OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC - Quarter Report: 2014 September (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q



ý	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended September 30, 2014



¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission File Number: 1-12043

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)



Delaware		98-0080034
(State or other jurisdiction of		(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)		Identification No.)

85 Broad Street

New York, New York 10004

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

(212) 668-8000

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check One):



Large accelerated filer	o	Accelerated filer	x

Non-accelerated filer	o	Smaller reporting company	o

Indicate by a check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x

The number of shares of the Company’s Class A non-voting common stock and Class B voting common stock (being the only classes of common stock of the Company) outstanding on October 31, 2014 was 13,530,688 and 99,680 shares, respectively.

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q



		Page No.
PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013	2
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	5
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013	6
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	7
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	55
Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	72
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	72
PART II	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	73
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	77
Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	77
Item 6.	Exhibits	77
	Signatures	78

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements (unaudited)

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (unaudited)



(Expressed in thousands, except share amounts)	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	77,942	$	98,294
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes	19,106		36,323
Deposits with clearing organizations	31,611		23,679
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	380,943		364,873
Receivable from customers, net of allowance for credit losses of $2,451 ($2,423 in 2013)	883,133		868,869
Income tax receivable, net	7,801		6,562
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	250,000		184,825
Securities owned, including amounts pledged of $498,928 ($586,625 in 2013), at fair value	806,772		856,088
Notes receivable, net	37,673		40,751
Office facilities, net accumulated depreciation of $102,246 ($97,118 in 2013)	30,518		32,939
Loans held for sale	20,095		75,989
Mortgage servicing rights	29,496		28,879
Intangible assets	31,700		31,700
Goodwill	137,889		137,889
Other assets	131,064		165,060
Total assets	$	2,875,743	$	2,952,720
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Drafts payable	$	24,316	$	48,198
Bank call loans	135,500		118,200
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	204,950		223,315
Payable to customers	689,363		626,564
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	688,310		757,491
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value	128,262		76,314
Accrued compensation	138,782		180,119
Accounts payable and other liabilities	170,175		192,552
Senior secured notes	150,000		195,000
Deferred tax liabilities, net	13,519		7,096
Total liabilities	2,343,177		2,424,849
Contingencies (Note 11)
Stockholders’ equity
Share capital
Class A non-voting common stock (2014 – 13,530,688 shares issued and outstanding; 2013 – 13,377,967 shares issued and outstanding)	62,264		60,065
Class B voting common stock (99,680 shares issued and outstanding)	133		133
	62,397		60,198
Contributed capital	43,950		42,407
Retained earnings	419,861		418,204
Accumulated other comprehensive income	353		1,709
Total Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. stockholders’ equity	526,561		522,518
Non-controlling interest	6,005		5,353
Total stockholders’ equity	532,566		527,871
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	2,875,743	$	2,952,720

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (unaudited)



	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Expressed in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)	2014		2013		2014		2013
REVENUE
Commissions	$	110,862	$	120,252	$	349,062	$	364,272
Advisory fees	70,957		60,117		209,592		177,417
Investment banking	33,841		21,362		94,164		62,377
Interest	12,449		14,439		37,387		39,916
Principal transactions, net	4,272		10,347		24,883		33,596
Other	12,298		16,859		34,448		48,774
Total revenue	244,679		243,376		749,536		726,352
EXPENSES
Compensation and related expenses	161,334		161,081		493,135		480,296
Communications and technology	15,991		16,999		50,261		48,881
Occupancy and equipment costs	15,801		16,405		47,105		51,111
Clearing and exchange fees	5,969		6,099		17,885		18,434
Interest	4,127		6,164		13,703		20,169
Other	30,561		28,465		111,306		86,911
Total expenses	233,783		235,213		733,395		705,802
Income before income taxes	10,896		8,163		16,141		20,550
Income tax provision	6,271		2,655		9,349		8,083
Net income for the period	4,625		5,508		6,792		12,467
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax	155		271		652		719
Net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	$	4,470	$	5,237	$	6,140	$	11,748
Earnings per share attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.
Basic	$	0.33	$	0.38	$	0.45	$	0.86
Diluted	$	0.31	$	0.37	$	0.43	$	0.83
Dividends declared per share	$	0.11	$	0.11	$	0.33	$	0.33
Weighted average shares
Basic	13,630,368		13,604,276		13,595,458		13,606,527
Diluted	14,297,442		14,171,802		14,217,247		14,110,131

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (unaudited)



	Three Months Ended September 30,					Nine Months Ended September 30,
(Expressed in thousands)	2014			2013		2014			2013
Net income for the period	$	4,625		$	5,508	$	6,792		$	12,467
Other comprehensive income, net of tax ⁽¹⁾
Currency translation adjustment	(1,608		)	656		(1,356		)	1,156
Comprehensive income for the period	3,017			6,164		5,436			13,623
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interests, net of tax	155			271		652			719
Comprehensive income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	$	2,862		$	5,893	$	4,784		$	12,904


(1)	Other comprehensive income is attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. No other comprehensive income is attributable to non-controlling interests.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (unaudited)

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,



(Expressed in thousands)	2014			2013
Share capital
Balance at beginning of period	$	60,198		$	62,181
Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock	2,199			1,577
Repurchase of Class A non-voting common stock for cancellation	—			(2,314		)
Balance at end of period	62,397			61,444
Contributed capital
Balance at beginning of period	42,407			39,231
Tax benefit from share-based awards	1,275			(92		)
Share-based expense	4,445			3,863
Vested employee share plan awards	(4,177		)	(1,891		)
Balance at end of period	43,950			41,111
Retained earnings
Balance at beginning of period	418,204			399,121
Net income for the period attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	6,140			11,748
Dividends paid ($0.33 per share)	(4,483		)	(4,494		)
Balance at end of period	419,861			406,375
Accumulated other comprehensive income
Balance at beginning of period	1,709			207
Currency translation adjustment	(1,356		)	1,156
Balance at end of period	353			1,363
Total Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. stockholders’ equity	526,561			510,293
Non-controlling interest
Balance at beginning of period	5,353			4,261
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax	652			719
Balance at end of period	6,005			4,980
Total stockholders’ equity	$	532,566		$	515,273

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (unaudited)

FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30,



(Expressed in thousands)	2014			2013
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income for the period	$	6,792		$	12,467
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
Payment of taxes due for share-based awards	(2,074		)	—
Non-cash items included in net income:
Depreciation and amortization of office facilities and leasehold improvements	5,787			7,434
Deferred income taxes	6,423			13,862
Amortization of notes receivable	12,393			14,086
Amortization of debt issuance costs	408			479
Write-off of debt issuance costs	588			—
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights	2,025			1,120
Provision for credit losses	28			178
Share-based compensation	3,682			3,966
Decrease (increase) in operating assets:
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes	17,217			(3,569		)
Deposits with clearing organizations	(7,932		)	900
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	(16,070		)	84,192
Receivable from customers	(14,292		)	(55,670		)
Income tax receivable	(1,239		)	(5,701		)
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	(65,175		)	—
Securities owned	49,316			(322,727		)
Notes receivable	(9,315		)	(9,875		)
Loans held for sale	55,894			(42,883		)
Mortgage servicing rights less amortization	(2,642		)	(2,258		)
Other assets	31,644			(14,407		)
Increase (decrease) in operating liabilities:
Drafts payable	(23,882		)	(20,421		)
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	(18,365		)	61,725
Payable to customers	62,799			(1,467		)
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	(69,181		)	238,462
Securities sold, but not yet purchased	51,948			69,615
Accrued compensation	(40,574		)	(17,340		)
Accounts payable and other liabilities	(22,466		)	10,780
Cash provided by operating activities	13,737			22,948
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of office facilities	(3,366		)	(12,642		)
Cash used in investing activities	(3,366		)	(12,642		)
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash dividends paid on Class A non-voting and Class B voting common stock	(4,483		)	(4,494		)
Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock	185			85
Repurchase of Class A non-voting common stock for cancellation	—			(2,314		)
Tax benefit (deficiency) from share-based awards	1,275			(92		)
Redemption of senior secured notes	(45,000		)	—
Increase (decrease) in bank call loans, net	17,300			(33,500		)
Cash used in financing activities	(30,723		)	(40,315		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	(20,352		)	(30,009		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period	98,294			135,366
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	77,942		$	105,357
Schedule of non-cash financing activities
Employee share plan issuance	$	2,014		$	1,492
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information
Cash paid during the period for interest	$	11,400		$	14,993
Cash paid during the period for income taxes, net of refunds	$	4,103		$	4,446

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (unaudited)

1. Organization and basis of presentation

Organization

Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. (“OPY”) is incorporated under the laws of the State of Delaware. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of OPY and its subsidiaries (together, the “Company”). The principal subsidiaries of OPY are Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (“Oppenheimer”), a registered broker dealer in securities and investment advisor under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc. (“OAM”) and its wholly owned subsidiary, Oppenheimer Investment Management Inc. (“OIM”), both registered investment advisors under the Investment Advisors Act of 1940, Oppenheimer Trust Company of Delaware (“Oppenheimer Trust”), a limited purpose trust company that provides fiduciary services such as trust and estate administration and investment management, Oppenheimer Multifamily Housing & Healthcare Finance, Inc. (“OMHHF”), which is engaged in commercial mortgage origination and servicing, OPY Credit Corp., which offers syndication as well as trading of issued corporate loans, Oppenheimer Europe Ltd., based in the United Kingdom with offices in the Isle of Jersey and Switzerland, which provides institutional equities and fixed income brokerage and corporate financial services and is regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority, and Oppenheimer Investments Asia Limited, based in Hong Kong, China, which provides assistance in accessing the U.S. equities markets and limited mergers and acquisitions advisory services to Asia-based companies, as well as offering fixed income brokerage services to institutional investors, and is regulated by the Securities and Futures Commission.

Oppenheimer provides its services from 94 offices in 25 states located throughout the United States and in 6 foreign jurisdictions. Oppenheimer owns Freedom Investments, Inc. (“Freedom”), a registered broker dealer in securities, which also operates the BUY and HOLD division, offering on-line discount brokerage and dollar-based investing services, and Oppenheimer Israel (OPCO) Ltd., which is engaged in offering investment services in the State of Israel. Freedom has been approved to operate as a representative office in Beijing, China. Oppenheimer holds a trading permit on the New York Stock Exchange and is a member of several other regional exchanges in the United States.

Basis of Presentation

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared pursuant to the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) regarding interim financial reporting. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and notes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (“U.S. GAAP”) for complete financial statements and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 (the “Form 10-K”). The accompanying December 31, 2013 condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by U.S. GAAP for annual financial statement purposes. The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements reflect all adjustments which are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. Preparing financial statements requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts that are reported in the financial statements and the accompanying disclosures. Although these estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events and actions that the Company may undertake in the future, actual results may differ materially from the estimates. The condensed consolidated results of operations for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2014 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for any future interim or annual period.

Certain prior period amounts have been reclassified to conform to the current period presentation.

Accounting standards require the Company to present non-controlling interests as a separate component of stockholders’ equity on the Company’s condensed consolidated balance sheet. As of September 30, 2014, the Company owned 83.68% of OMHHF and the non-controlling interest recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheet was $6.0 million.

Table of Contents

2. New accounting pronouncements

Recently Adopted

In June 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2013-08 “Financial Services – Investment Companies, Amendments to the Scope, Measurement and Disclosure Requirement.” The ASU clarifies the characteristics of an investment company by amending the measurement criteria for certain interests in other investment companies. Additionally, the ASU introduces new disclosure requirements. The ASU became effective for the Company prospectively beginning January 1, 2014. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

In July 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11 “Presentation of Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists.” The ASU provides guidance that an unrecognized tax benefit should be presented in the financial statements as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward. The ASU became effective for the Company prospectively beginning January 1, 2014. The adoption of this accounting guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued

In April 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-08, “Reporting Discontinued Operations and Disclosures of Disposals of Components of an Entity.” Under this ASU, a discontinued operation is defined as a disposal of a component or group of components that is disposed of and represents a strategic shift that has or will have a major effect on an entity’s operation. The ASU also modified related disclosure requirements. The ASU is effective for the annual reporting period in the fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2014 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the ASU will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-09, "Revenue from Contracts with Customers." The ASU outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers. Additionally, the ASU expands the disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. The ASU is effective for the annual reporting period in the fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2017 and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the ASU will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-11, "Transfers and Servicing – Repurchase-to-Maturity Transactions, Repurchase Financing, and Disclosures," which makes amendments to the guidance in Accounting Standards Codification 860 on accounting for certain repurchase agreements. The ASU is effective for the annual reporting period in the fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is not permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the ASU will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In June 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-12, "Compensation - Stock Compensation." The ASU clarifies that entities should treat performance targets that can be met after the requisite service period of a share-based award as performance conditions that affect vesting. The ASU is effective for the annual reporting period in the fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2015 and early adoption is permitted. The Company will not early adopt this ASU. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if any, that the ASU will have on its financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU No. 2014-15, "Disclosure of Uncertanities About an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern," which provides guidance on determining when and how reporting entities must disclose going-concern uncertainties in their financial statements. The ASU requires management of an entity to perform interim and annual assessments of an entity's ability to continue as a going concern within one year of the date of issuance of the entity's financial statements and also provide disclosures if there is "substantial doubt about the entity's ability to continue as a going concern." The ASU is effective for the annual reporting period in the fiscal year that begins after December 15, 2016 and early adoption is permitted. The Company will evaluate the impact on its disclosure.

Table of Contents

3. Earnings per share

Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. by the weighted average number of shares of Class A non-voting common stock (“Class A Stock”) and Class B voting common stock (“Class B Stock”) outstanding. The number of shares included in the Company's diluted earnings per share includes the weighted average number of shares of Class A Stock and Class B Stock outstanding and restricted stock awards of Class A Stock using the treasury stock method.

Earnings per share have been calculated as follows:



(Expressed in thousands, except number of shares and per share amounts)
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Basic weighted average number of shares outstanding	13,630,368		13,604,276		13,595,458		13,606,527
Net dilutive effect of share-based awards, treasury method ⁽¹⁾	667,074		567,526		621,789		503,604
Diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding	14,297,442		14,171,802		14,217,247		14,110,131
Net income for the period	$	4,625	$	5,508	$	6,792	$	12,467
Net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax	155		271		652		719
Net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	$	4,470	$	5,237	$	6,140	$	11,748
Basic earnings per share	$	0.33	$	0.38	$	0.45	$	0.86
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.31	$	0.37	$	0.43	$	0.83


(1)	For both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, the diluted earnings per share computation does not include the anti-dilutive effect of 58,008 shares of Class A Stock granted under share-based compensation arrangements (57,573 shares of Class A Stock granted under share-based compensation arrangements for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013).

4. Receivable from and payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations



(Expressed in thousands)
	As of
	September 30, 2014		December 31, 2013
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations consist of:
Securities borrowed	$	267,643	$	274,127
Receivable from brokers	52,616		23,384
Securities failed to deliver	24,476		9,628
Clearing organizations	21,705		26,446
Omnibus accounts	—		18,086
Other	14,503		13,202
Total	$	380,943	$	364,873
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations consist of:
Securities loaned	$	164,095	$	211,621
Securities failed to receive	32,297		5,346
Clearing organizations and other	8,558		6,348
Total	$	204,950	$	223,315

Table of Contents

5. Financial instruments

Securities owned and securities sold but not yet purchased, investments and derivative contracts are carried at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each period. The Company’s other financial instruments are generally short-term in nature or have variable interest rates and as such their carrying values approximate fair value.

Securities Owned and Securities Sold, But Not Yet Purchased at Fair Value



(Expressed in thousands)
	As of September 30, 2014				As of December 31, 2013
	Owned		Sold		Owned		Sold
U.S. Government, agency and sovereign obligations	$	522,010	$	67,496	$	596,114	$	11,889
Corporate debt and other obligations	19,922		3,010		14,673		4,847
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities	4,792		—		3,395		7
Municipal obligations	62,250		55		40,166		72
Convertible bonds	58,795		8,229		53,719		13,922
Corporate equities	49,012		49,457		61,634		45,336
Money markets	2,668		15		1,263		241
Auction rate securities	87,323		—		85,124		—
Total	$	806,772	$	128,262	$	856,088	$	76,314

Securities owned and securities sold, but not yet purchased, consist of trading and investment securities at fair values. Included in securities owned at September 30, 2014 are corporate equities with estimated fair values of approximately $15.4 million ($15.3 million at December 31, 2013), which are related to deferred compensation liabilities to certain employees included in accrued compensation on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Valuation Techniques

A description of the valuation techniques applied and inputs used in measuring the fair value of the Company’s financial instruments is as follows:

U.S. Government Obligations

U.S. Treasury securities are valued using quoted market prices obtained from active market makers and inter-dealer brokers and, accordingly, are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

U.S. Agency Obligations

U.S. agency securities consist of agency issued debt securities and mortgage pass-through securities. Non-callable agency issued debt securities are generally valued using quoted market prices. Callable agency issued debt securities are valued by benchmarking model-derived prices to quoted market prices and trade data for identical or comparable securities. The fair value of mortgage pass-through securities are model driven with respect to spreads of the comparable To-be-announced (“TBA”) security. Actively traded non-callable agency-issued debt securities are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Callable agency-issued debt securities and mortgage pass-through securities are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Sovereign Obligations

The fair value of sovereign obligations is determined based on quoted market prices when available or a valuation model that generally utilizes interest rate yield curves and credit spreads as inputs. Sovereign obligations are categorized in Level 1 or 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Corporate Debt and Other Obligations

The fair value of corporate bonds is estimated using recent transactions, broker quotations and bond spread information. Corporate bonds are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Table of Contents

Mortgage and Other Asset-Backed Securities

The Company holds non-agency securities collateralized by home equity and various other types of collateral which are valued based on external pricing and spread data provided by independent pricing services and are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. When specific external pricing is not observable, the valuation is based on yields and spreads for comparable bonds and, consequently, the positions are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Municipal Obligations

The fair value of municipal obligations is estimated using recently executed transactions, broker quotations, and bond spread information. These obligations are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; in instances where significant inputs are unobservable, they are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Convertible Bonds

The fair value of convertible bonds is estimated using recently executed transactions and dollar-neutral price quotations, where observable. When observable price quotations are not available, fair value is determined based on cash flow models using yield curves and bond spreads as key inputs. Convertible bonds are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy; in instances where significant inputs are unobservable, they are categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Corporate Equities

Equity securities and options are generally valued based on quoted prices from the exchange or market where traded and categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. To the extent quoted prices are not available, fair values are generally derived using bid/ask spreads, and these securities are generally categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Loans Held for Sale

The loans held for sale are reported at fair value. The Company determines the fair value of the loans held for sale using both a discounted cash flow model and quoted observable prices from market participants. Therefore, the Company categorizes these loans held for sale in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Interest Rate Lock Commitments

OMHHF records an interest rate lock commitment upon the commitment to originate a loan with a borrower. This commitment, which can be an asset or a liability, is recognized at fair value, which reflects the fair value of the contractual loan origination related fees and sale premiums, net of co-broker fees, and the estimated fair value of the expected net future cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan. The interest rate lock commitments are valued using a discounted cash flow model developed based on U.S. Treasury rate changes and other observable market data. The fair value is determined after considering the potential impact of collateralization, and the Company categorizes these commitments within Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

To-Be-Announced (“TBA”) sale contracts

TBA sale contracts of permanent loans originated or purchased at OMHHF are based on observable market prices of recently executed purchases of similar loans which are then used to derive a market implied spread, which in turn is used as the primary input in estimating the fair value of loans at the measurement date. TBA sale contracts of construction loans originated or purchased at OMHHF are based on observable market prices of recently executed purchases. TBA sale contracts are categorized within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy given the observability and volume of recently executed transactions.

Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”)

The Company’s MSRs are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. The MSRs are initially measured at fair value on the loan securitization date and subsequently measured on the amortized cost basis subject to quarterly impairment testing. MSRs do not trade in active open markets with readily observable pricing. Therefore the Company uses a discounted cash flow model to estimate the fair value of MSRs. The discounted cash flow model calculates the present value of estimated future net servicing income using inputs such as contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment assumptions, delinquency rates, late charges, other ancillary revenue, costs to service and other economic factors. The Company reassesses and periodically adjusts

Table of Contents

the underlying inputs and assumptions used in the model to reflect observable and unobservable market conditions and assumptions that a market participant would consider in valuing an MSR asset. MSRs are carried at the lower of amortized cost or estimated fair value.

The following key assumptions were used in determining the initial fair value of MSRs:

Discount Rate – The discount rate used for originated permanent and construction loans averaged approximately 12%.

Estimated Life – The estimated life of the MSRs is derived using a continuous prepayment (“CPR”) assumption which estimates projected prepayments of the loan portfolio by considering factors such as note rates, lockouts, and prepayment penalties at the loan level. The CPR rates used are 0% until such time that a loan's prepayment penalty rate hits 4% of the unpaid principal balance of the loan with the vast majority of CPR speeds ranging from 10% to 15% thereafter, with an average of 12%.

Servicing Costs – The estimated future cost to service the loans on an annual basis per loan averages approximately $1,250 for a permanent loan, with a considerably higher cost to service during the construction phase.

The Company does not anticipate any credit losses on the commercial mortgages it services since all of the mortgages are insured for and guaranteed against credit losses by the Federal Housing Administration (“FHA”) and the Government National Mortgage Association (“GNMA”) and are thus guaranteed by the U.S. government.

Auction Rate Securities ("ARS")

In February 2010, Oppenheimer finalized settlements with each of the New York Attorney General’s office (“NYAG”) and the Massachusetts Securities Division (“MSD” and, together with the NYAG, the “Regulators”) concluding investigations and administrative proceedings by the Regulators concerning Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of ARS. Pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators, Oppenheimer agreed to extend offers to repurchase ARS from certain of its clients subject to certain terms and conditions more fully described below. In addition to the settlements with the Regulators, Oppenheimer has also reached settlements of and received adverse awards in legal proceedings with various clients where the Company is obligated to purchase ARS. Pursuant to completed Purchase Offers (as defined) under the settlements with the Regulators and client related legal settlements and awards to purchase ARS, as of September 30, 2014, the Company purchased and holds (net of redemptions) approximately $94.8 million in ARS from its clients. In addition, the Company is committed to purchase another $13.1 million in ARS from clients through 2016 under legal settlements and awards.

Interest rates on ARS typically reset through periodic auctions. Due to the auction mechanism and generally liquid markets, ARS have historically been categorized as Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Beginning in February 2008, uncertainties in the credit markets resulted in substantially all of the ARS market experiencing failed auctions. Once the auctions failed, the ARS could no longer be valued using observable prices set in the auctions. The Company has used less observable determinants of the fair value of ARS, including the strength in the underlying credits, announced issuer redemptions, completed issuer redemptions, and announcements from issuers regarding their intentions with respect to their outstanding ARS. The Company has also developed an internal methodology to discount for the lack of liquidity and non-performance risk of the failed auctions. Due to liquidity problems associated with the ARS market, ARS that lack liquidity are setting their interest rates according to a maximum rate formula. For example, an auction rate preferred security maximum rate may be set at 200% of a short-term index such as LIBOR or U.S. Treasury yield. For fair value purposes, the Company has determined that the maximum spread would be an adequate risk premium to account for illiquidity in the market. Accordingly, the Company applies a spread to the short-term index for each asset class to derive the discount rate. The Company uses short-term U.S. Treasury yields as its benchmark short-term index. The risk of non-performance is typically reflected in the prices of ARS positions where the fair value is derived from recent trades in the secondary market. Accordingly, the Company adds a spread to the short-term index for each asset class to derive the discount rate. The Company uses short-term U.S. Treasury yields as its benchmark short-term index.

The ARS purchase commitment, or derivative liability, arises from both the settlements with the Regulators and legal settlements and awards. The ARS purchase commitment represents the difference between the principal value and the fair value of the ARS the Company is committed to purchase. The Company utilizes the same valuation methodology for the ARS purchase commitment as it does for the ARS it owns. Additionally, the present value of the future principal value of ARS

Table of Contents

purchase commitments under legal settlements and awards is used in the discounted valuation model to reflect the time value of money over the period of time that the commitments are outstanding. The amount of the ARS purchase commitment only becomes determinable once the Company has met with its primary regulator and the NYAG and agreed upon a buyback amount, commenced the ARS buyback offer to clients, and received notice from its clients which ARS they are tendering. As a result, it is not possible to observe the current yields actually paid on the ARS until all of these events have happened which is typically very close to the time that the Company actually purchases the ARS. For ARS purchase commitments pursuant to legal settlements and awards, the criteria for purchasing ARS from clients is based on the nature of the settlement or award which will stipulate a time period and amount for each repurchase. The Company will not know which ARS will be tendered by the client until the stipulated time for repurchase is reached. Therefore, the Company uses the current yields of ARS owned in its discounted valuation model to determine a fair value of ARS purchase commitments. The Company also uses these current yields by asset class (i.e., auction rate preferred securities, municipal auction rate securities, and student loan auction rate securities) in its discounted valuation model to determine the fair value of ARS purchase commitments. In addition, the Company uses the discount rate and duration of ARS owned, by asset class, as a proxy for the duration of ARS purchase commitments.

Table of Contents

Additional information regarding the valuation technique and inputs for level 3 financial instruments used is as follows:



(Expressed in thousands)
Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2014
Product	Principal		Valuation Adjustment		Fair Value		Valuation Technique	Unobservable Input	Range	Weighted Average
Auction Rate Securities Owned ⁽¹⁾
Auction Rate Preferred Securities	$	74,400	$	4,392	$	70,008	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount Rate ⁽²⁾	1.54% to 2.1%	1.82%
								Duration	4.0 years	4.0 years
								Current Yield ⁽³⁾	0.09% to 0.46%	0.28%
Municipal Auction Rate Securities	10,400		1,118		9,282		Discounted Cash Flow	Discount Rate ⁽⁴⁾	2.76%	2.76%
								Duration	4.5 years	4.5 years
								Current Yield ⁽³⁾	0.19%	0.19%
	5,975		624		5,351		Secondary Market Trading Activity	Observable trades in inactive market for in portfolio securities	89.60% of par	89.60% of par
Student Loan Auction Rate Securities	400		60		340		Discounted Cash Flow	Discount Rate ⁽⁵⁾	3.40%	3.40%
								Duration	7.0 years	7.0 years
								Current Yield⁽³⁾	0.98%	0.98%
Other ⁽⁷⁾	3,625		1,283		2,342		Secondary Market Trading Activity	Observable trades in inactive market for in portfolio securities	64.60% of par	64.60% of par
	$	94,800	$	7,477	$	87,323
Auction Rate Securities Commitments to Purchase ⁽⁶⁾
Auction Rate Preferred Securities	$	7,582	$	424	$	7,158	Discounted Cash Flow	Discount Rate ⁽²⁾	1.54% to 2.1%	1.82%
								Duration	4.0 years	4.0 years
								Current Yield ⁽³⁾	0.09% to 0.46%	0.28%
Municipal Auction Rate Securities	4,952		533		4,419		Discounted Cash Flow	Discount Rate ⁽⁴⁾	2.76%	2.76%
								Duration	4.5 years	4.5 years
								Current Yield ⁽³⁾	0.19%	0.19%
Student Loan Auction Rate Securities	538		80		458		Discounted Cash Flow	Discount Rate ⁽⁵⁾	3.40%	3.40%
								Duration	7.0 years	7.0 years
								Current Yield ⁽³⁾	0.98%	0.98%
	$	13,072	$	1,037	$	12,035
Total	$	107,872	$	8,514	$	99,358


(1)	Principal amount represents the par value of the ARS and is included in securities owned in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2014. The valuation adjustment amount is included as a reduction to securities owned in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as well as principal transactions revenue in the statements of income at September 30, 2014.

(2)Derived by applying a multiple to the spread between 110% to 150% to the U.S. Treasury rate of 1.40%.

(3)Based on current auctions in comparable securities that have not failed.

(4)Derived by applying a multiple to the spread of 175% to the U.S. Treasury rate of 1.58%.

(5)Derived by applying the sum of the spread of 1.20% to the U.S. Treasury rate of 2.20%.

Table of Contents


(6)	Principal amount represents the present value of the ARS par value that the Company is committed to purchase at a future date. This principal amount is presented as an off-balance sheet item. The valuation adjustment amount is included in accounts payable and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2014.


(7)	Represents ARS issued by a credit default obligation structure that the Company has purchased and is committed to purchase as a result of a legal settlement.

The fair value of ARS and ARS purchase commitments is particularly sensitive to movements in interest rates. Increases in short-term interest rates would increase the discount rate input used in the ARS valuation and thus reduce the fair value of the ARS (increase the valuation adjustment). Conversely, decreases in short-term interest rates would decrease the discount rate and thus increase the fair value of ARS (decrease the valuation adjustment). However, an increase (decrease) in the discount rate input would be partially mitigated by an increase (decrease) in the current yield earned on the underlying ARS asset increasing the cash flows and thus the fair value. Furthermore, movements in short term interest rates would likely impact the ARS duration (i.e., sensitivity of the price to a change in interest rates), which would also have a mitigating effect on interest rate movements. For example, as interest rates increase, issuers of ARS have an incentive to redeem outstanding securities as servicing the interest payments gets prohibitively expensive which would lower the duration assumption thereby increasing the ARS fair value. Alternatively, ARS issuers are less likely to redeem ARS in a lower interest rate environment as it is a relatively inexpensive source of financing which would increase the duration assumption thereby decreasing the ARS fair value. For example, see the following sensitivities:


•	The impact of a 25 basis point increase in the discount rate at September 30, 2014 would result in a decrease in the fair value of $910,000 does not consider a corresponding reduction in duration as discussed above.


•	The impact of a 50 basis point increase in the discount rate at September 30, 2014 would result in a decrease in the fair value of $1.8 million does not consider a corresponding reduction in duration as discussed above.

These sensitivities are hypothetical and are based on scenarios where they are “stressed” and should be used with caution. These estimates do not include all of the interplay among assumptions and are estimated as a portfolio rather than as individual assets.

Due to the less observable nature of these inputs, the Company categorizes ARS in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. As of September 30, 2014, the Company had a valuation adjustment (unrealized loss) of $7.5 million for ARS owned which is included in principal transactions on the condensed consolidated statement of income. As of September 30, 2014, the Company also had a valuation adjustment of $1.0 million on ARS purchase commitments from settlements with the Regulators and legal settlements and awards which is included in other revenue on the condensed consolidated statement of income. The total valuation adjustment was $8.5 million as of September 30, 2014. The valuation adjustment represents the difference between the principal value and the fair value of the ARS owned and ARS purchase commitments.

Investments

In its role as general partner in certain hedge funds and private equity funds, the Company, through its subsidiaries, holds direct investments in such funds. The Company uses the net asset value of the underlying fund as a basis for estimating the fair value of its investment. Due to the illiquid nature of these investments and difficulties in obtaining observable inputs, these investments are included in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Table of Contents

The following table provides information about the Company’s investments in Company-sponsored funds at September 30, 2014:



(Expressed in thousands)
	Fair Value		Unfunded Commitments		Redemption Frequency	Redemption Notice Period
Hedge funds⁽¹⁾	$	1,540	$	—	Quarterly - Annually	30 - 120 Days
Private equity funds⁽²⁾	6,178		1,996		N/A	N/A
	$	7,718	$	1,996


(1)	Includes investments in hedge funds and hedge fund of funds that pursue long/short, event-driven, and activist strategies. Each hedge fund has various restrictions regarding redemption; no investment is locked-up for a period greater than one year.


(2)	Includes private equity funds and private equity fund of funds with a focus on diversified portfolios, real estate and global natural resources. Due to the illiquid nature of these funds, investors are not permitted to make withdrawals without consent of the general partner. The lock-up period of the private equity fund is expected to be 10 years.

Derivative Contracts

From time to time, the Company transacts in exchange-traded and over-the-counter derivative transactions to manage its interest rate risk. Exchange-traded derivatives, namely U.S. Treasury futures, Federal funds futures and Eurodollar futures, are valued based on quoted prices from the exchange and are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. Over-the-counter derivatives are valued using a discounted cash flow model and the Black-Scholes model, respectively, using observable interest rate inputs and are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

As described below in “Credit Concentrations”, the Company participates in loan syndications and operates as an underwriting agent in leveraged financing transactions where it utilizes a warehouse facility provided by a commercial bank to extend financing commitments to third-party borrowers identified by the Company. The Company uses broker quotations on loans trading in the secondary market as a proxy to determine the fair value of the underlying loan commitment which is categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy. The Company also purchases and sells loans in its proprietary trading book. The Company uses broker quotations to determine the fair value of loan positions held which are categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.

Valuation Process

The Finance & Accounting (“F&A”) group is responsible for the Company’s fair value policies, processes and procedures. F&A is independent from the business units and trading desks and is headed by the Company’s Chief Financial Officer ("CFO"), who has final authority over the valuation of the Company’s financial instruments. The Finance Control Group (“FCG”) within F&A is responsible for daily profit and loss reporting, front-end trading system position reconciliations, monthly profit and loss reporting, and independent price verification procedures.

For financial instruments categorized in Levels 1 and 2 of the fair value hierarchy, the FCG performs a monthly independent price verification to determine the reasonableness of the prices provided by the Company’s independent pricing vendor. The FCG uses its third-party pricing vendor, executed transactions, and broker-dealer quotes for validating the fair values of financial instruments.

For financial instruments categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy measured on a recurring basis, primarily for ARS, a group comprised of the CFO, the Controller, and a financial analyst are responsible for the ARS valuation model and resulting fair valuations. Procedures performed include aggregating all ARS owned by type from firm inventory accounts and ARS purchase commitments from regulatory and legal settlements and awards provided by the Legal Department. Observable and unobservable inputs are aggregated from various sources and entered into the ARS valuation model. For unobservable inputs, the group reviews the appropriateness of the inputs to ensure consistency with how a market participant would arrive at the unobservable input. For example, for the duration assumption, the group would consider recent policy statements regarding short-term interest rates by the Federal Reserve and recent ARS issuer redemptions and announcements for future redemptions. The model output is reviewed for reasonableness and consistency. Where available, comparisons are performed between ARS owned or committed to purchase to ARS that are trading in the secondary market.

Table of Contents

For financial instruments categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy measured on a non-recurring basis, primarily for MSRs, the OMHHF Valuation Committee, which is comprised of the OMHHF President & Chief Executive Officer, OMHHF CFO, OMHHF Chief Operating Officer, and OMHHF Asset Manager, is responsible for the MSR model and resulting fair valuations. The OMHHF Valuation Committee performs its review of the model and assumptions and its impairment analysis on a quarterly basis. On an annual basis, the Company utilizes an external valuation consultant to validate that the internal MSR model is functioning appropriately. The OMHHF Valuation Committee compares assumptions used for unobservable inputs, such as for discount rates, estimated life, and costs of servicing, to that used by the external valuation consultant for reasonableness. The model output and resulting valuation multiples are reviewed for reasonableness and consistency. Where available, comparisons are performed to recent MSR sales in the secondary market. The Company’s management reviews the results of both the quarterly reviews and annual impairment analysis.

Assets and Liabilities Measured at Fair Value

The Company’s assets and liabilities, recorded at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, have been categorized based upon the above fair value hierarchy as follows:

Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014



(Expressed in thousands)
	Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2014
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Cash equivalents	$	33,364	$	—	$	—	$	33,364
Deposits with clearing organizations	16,595		—		—		16,595
Securities owned:
U.S. Treasury securities	503,509		—		—		503,509
U.S. Agency securities	—		15,067		—		15,067
Sovereign obligations	—		3,434		—		3,434
Corporate debt and other obligations	—		19,922		—		19,922
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities	—		4,792		—		4,792
Municipal obligations	—		62,121		129		62,250
Convertible bonds	—		58,795		—		58,795
Corporate equities	49,012		—		—		49,012
Money markets	2,668		—		—		2,668
Auction rate securities	—		—		87,323		87,323
Securities owned, at fair value	555,189		164,131		87,452		806,772
Investments ⁽¹⁾	98		49,597		8,423		58,118
Loans held for sale	—		20,095		—		20,095
Securities purchased under agreements to resell ⁽²⁾	—		250,000		—		250,000
Derivative contracts:
TBAs	—		1,774		—		1,774
Interest rate lock commitments	—		—		5,511		5,511
Derivative contracts, total	—		1,774		5,511		7,285
Total	$	605,246	$	485,597	$	101,386	$	1,192,229
Liabilities
Securities sold, but not yet purchased:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	67,472	$	—	$	—	$	67,472
U.S. Agency securities	—		24		—		24
Corporate debt and other obligations	—		3,010		—		3,010
Municipal obligations	—		55		—		55
Convertible bonds	—		8,229		—		8,229
Corporate equities	49,457		—		—		49,457
Money markets	15		—		—		15
Securities sold, but not yet purchased at fair value	116,944		11,318		—		128,262
Derivative contracts:
U.S. treasury futures	87		—		—		87
Federal funds futures	135		—				135
Eurodollars futures	60		—		—		60
General collateral futures	2		—		—		2
TBAs	—		33		—		33
Interest rate lock commitments	—		—		3,188		3,188
ARS purchase commitments	—		—		1,037		1,037
Derivative contracts, total	284		33		4,225		4,542
Total	$	117,228	$	11,351	$	4,225	$	132,804


(1)	Included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


(2)	Included in securities purchased under agreements to resell where the Company has elected fair value option treatment.

Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013



(Expressed in thousands)
	Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013
	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Assets
Cash equivalents	$	60,268	$	—	$	—	$	60,268
Securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes	11,495		—		—		11,495
Deposits with clearing organizations	10,492		—		—		10,492
Securities owned:
U.S. Treasury securities	566,346		—		—		566,346
U.S. Agency securities	—		29,448		—		29,448
Sovereign obligations	—		320		—		320
Corporate debt and other obligations	—		14,673		—		14,673
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities	—		3,395		—		3,395
Municipal obligations	—		39,930		236		40,166
Convertible bonds	—		53,719		—		53,719
Corporate equities	61,634		—		—		61,634
Money markets	1,263		—		—		1,263
Auction rate securities	—		—		85,124		85,124
Securities owned, at fair value	629,243		141,485		85,360		856,088
Investments ⁽¹⁾	10,775		47,726		5,946		64,447
Loans held for sale	—		75,989		—		75,989
Securities purchased under agreements to resell ⁽²⁾	—		184,000		—		184,000
Derivative contracts:
TBAs	—		2,155		—		2,155
Interest rate lock commitments	—		—		2,375		2,375
Derivative contracts, total	—		2,155		2,375		4,530
Total	$	722,273	$	451,355	$	93,681	$	1,267,309
Liabilities
Securities sold, but not yet purchased:
U.S. Treasury securities	$	11,837	$	—	$	—	$	11,837
U.S. Agency securities	—		52		—		52
Corporate debt and other obligations	—		4,847		—		4,847
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities	—		7		—		7
Municipal obligations	—		72		—		72
Convertible bonds	—		13,922		—		13,922
Corporate equities	45,336		—		—		45,336
Money markets	241		—		—		241
Securities sold, but not yet purchased at fair value	57,414		18,900		—		76,314
Investments	648		—		—		648
Derivative contracts:
U.S. treasury futures	186		—		—		186
Federal funds futures	18		—		—		18
Eurodollars futures	44		—		—		44
TBAs	—		73		—		73
Interest rate lock commitments	—		—		3,653		3,653
ARS purchase commitments	—		—		2,600		2,600
Derivative contracts, total	248		73		6,253		6,574
Total	$	58,310	$	18,973	$	6,253	$	83,536


(1)	Included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


(2)	Included in securities purchased under agreements to resell where the Company has elected fair value option treatment.

Table of Contents

There were no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets and liabilities in the three months ended September 30, 2014.

The following tables present changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:



(Expressed in thousands)
	Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
			Total Realized
			and Unrealized
	Beginning		Gains			Purchases		Sales and			Transfers		Ending
	Balance		(Losses) ⁽⁵⁾⁽⁶⁾			and Issuances ⁽⁷⁾		Settlements			In (Out)		Balance
Assets
Municipals	$	52	$	77		$	—	$	—		$	—	$	129
Auction rate securities ⁽¹⁾⁽⁸⁾	92,548		(645		)	2,375		(6,955		)	—		87,323
Interest rate lock commitments ⁽²⁾	10,528		(5,017		)	—		—			—		5,511
Investments ⁽³⁾	8,779		(254		)	180		(282		)	—		8,423
Liabilities
Interest rate lock commitments ⁽²⁾	3,833		645			—		—			—		3,188
ARS purchase commitments ⁽⁴⁾	1,514		477			—		—			—		1,037


(1)	Represents auction rate preferred securities, municipal auction rate securities and student loan auction rate securities that failed in the auction rate market.

(2)

Interest rate lock commitment assets and liabilities are recorded upon the commitment to originate a loan with a borrower and sell the loan to an investor. The commitment assets and liabilities are recognized at fair value, which reflects the fair value of the contractual loan origination related fees and sale premiums, net of co-broker fees, and the estimated fair value of the expected net future cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan.


(3)	Primarily represents general partner ownership and limited partner interests in hedge funds and private equity funds sponsored by the Company.


(4)	Represents the difference in principal and fair value for auction rate securities purchase commitments outstanding at the end of the period.


(5)	Included in principal transactions on the condensed consolidated statement of income, except for investments which are included in other income on the condensed consolidated statement of income.


(6)	Unrealized gains (losses) are attributable to assets or liabilities that are still held at the reporting date.

(7)

Purchases and issuances in connection with ARS purchase commitments represent instances in which the Company purchased ARS securities from clients during the period pursuant to regulatory and legal settlements and awards that satisfy the outstanding commitment to purchase obligation. This also includes instances where the ARS issuer has redeemed ARS where the Company had an outstanding purchase commitment prior to the Company purchasing those ARS.


(8)	Sales and settlements for the ARS purchase commitments represent additional purchase commitments made during the period for regulatory and legal ARS settlements and awards.

Table of Contents



(Expressed in thousands)
	Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
			Total Realized
			and Unrealized
	Beginning		Gains			Purchases		Sales and			Transfers			Ending
	Balance		(Losses) ⁽⁵⁾⁽⁶⁾			and Issuances ⁽⁷⁾		Settlements			In (Out)			Balance
Assets
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities⁽¹⁾	$	67	$	—		$	—	$	(8	)	$	(59	)	$	—
Municipals	236		—			—		—			—			236
Auction rate securities ⁽²⁾⁽⁸⁾	78,076		(245		)	2,750		(150		)	—			80,431
Investments ⁽³⁾	12,974		(413		)	1,000		(7,435		)	—			6,126
Liabilities
ARS purchase commitments ⁽⁴⁾	2,329		(83		)	—		—			—			2,412


(1)	Represents private placements of non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations.


(2)	Represents auction rate preferred securities, municipal auction rate securities and student loan auction rate securities that failed in the auction rate market.


(3)	Primarily represents general partner ownership interests in hedge funds and private equity funds sponsored by the Company.


(4)	Represents the difference in principal and fair value for auction rate securities purchase commitments outstanding at the end of the period.


(5)	Included in principal transactions on the condensed consolidated statement of income, except for investments which are included in other income on the condensed consolidated statement of income.


(6)	Unrealized gains (losses) are attributable to assets or liabilities that are still held at the reporting date.

(7)


(8)	Sales and settlements for the ARS purchase commitments represent additional purchase commitments made during the period for regulatory and legal ARS settlements and awards.

Table of Contents

The following tables present changes in Level 3 assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:



(Expressed in thousands)
	Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
			Total Realized
			and Unrealized
	Beginning		Gains			Purchases		Sales and			Transfers			Ending
	Balance		(Losses) ⁽⁵⁾⁽⁶⁾			and Issuances ⁽⁷⁾		Settlements			In (Out)			Balance
Assets
Municipals	$	236	$	(107	)	$	—	$	—		$	—		$	129
Auction rate securities⁽¹⁾⁽⁸⁾	85,124		(971		)	16,550		(13,380		)	—			87,323
Interest rate lock commitments ⁽²⁾	2,375		3,136			—		—			—			5,511
Investments ⁽³⁾	5,946		(341		)	4,444		(1,006		)	(620		)	8,423
Liabilities
Interest rate lock commitments ⁽²⁾	3,653		465			—		—			—			3,188
ARS purchase commitments ⁽⁴⁾	2,600		1,563			—		—			—			1,037


(1)	Represents auction rate preferred securities, municipal auction rate securities and student loan auction rate securities that failed in the auction rate market.

(2)

Interest rate lock commitments assets and liabilities are recorded upon the commitment to originate a loan with a borrower and sell the loan to an investor. The commitment assets and liabilities are recognized at fair value, which reflects the fair value of the contractual loan origination related fees and sale premiums, net of co-broker fees, and the estimated fair value of the expected net future cash flows associated with the servicing of the loan.


(3)	Primarily represents general partner ownership and limited partner interests in hedge funds and private equity funds sponsored by the Company.


(4)	Represents the difference in principal and fair value for auction rate securities purchase commitments outstanding at the end of the period.


(5)	Included in principal transactions on the condensed consolidated statement of income, except for investments which are included in other income on the condensed consolidated statement of income.


(6)	Unrealized gains (losses) are attributable to assets or liabilities that are still held at the reporting date.

(7)


(8)	Sales and settlements for the ARS purchase commitments represent additional purchase commitments made during the period for regulatory and legal ARS settlements and awards.

Table of Contents



(Expressed in thousands)
	Level 3 Assets and Liabilities
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
			Total Realized
			and Unrealized
	Beginning		Gains			Purchases		Sales and			Transfers			Ending
	Balance		(Losses) ⁽⁵⁾⁽⁶⁾			and Issuances⁽⁷⁾		Settlements			In (Out)			Balance
Assets
Mortgage and other asset-backed securities ⁽¹⁾	$	40	$	—		$	—	$	(8	)	$	(32	)	$	—
Municipals	239		(3		)	—		—			—			236
Auction rate securities⁽²⁾⁽⁸⁾	72,118		(437		)	13,175		(4,425		)	—			80,431
Investments ⁽³⁾	12,954		210			1,000		(8,038		)	—			6,126
Liabilities
Auction rate securities⁽²⁾	100		—			100		—			—			—
ARS purchase commitments⁽⁴⁾	2,647		235			—		—			—			2,412


(1)	Represents private placements of non-agency collateralized mortgage obligations.


(2)	Represents auction rate preferred securities, municipal auction rate securities and student loan auction rate securities that failed in the auction rate market.


(3)	Primarily represents general partner ownership interests in hedge funds and private equity funds sponsored by the Company.


(4)	Represents the difference in principal and fair value for auction rate securities purchase commitments outstanding at the end of the period.


(5)	Included in principal transactions on the condensed consolidated statement of income, except for investments which are included in other income on the condensed consolidated statement of income.


(6)	Unrealized gains (losses) are attributable to assets or liabilities that are still held at the reporting date.

(7)


(8)	Sales and settlements for the ARS purchase commitments represent additional purchase commitments made during the period for regulatory and legal ARS settlements and awards.

Table of Contents

Financial Instruments Not Measured at Fair Value

The tables below present the carrying value, fair value and fair value hierarchy category of certain financial instruments that are not measured at fair value in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. The tables below exclude non-financial assets and liabilities (e.g., office facilities and accrued compensation).

The carrying value of financial instruments not measured at fair value categorized in the fair value hierarchy as Level 1 or Level 2 (e.g., cash and receivables from customers) approximates fair value because of the relatively short period of time between their origination and expected maturity. The fair value of the Company’s 8.75% Senior Secured Notes, categorized in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, is based on quoted prices from the market in which the Notes trade.

The fair value of MSRs is based on observable and unobservable inputs and thus categorized as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of MSRs is based on a discounted cash flow valuation methodology on a loan level basis that determines the present value of future cash flows expected to be realized. The fair value considers estimated future servicing fees and ancillary revenue, offset by the estimated costs to service the loans. The discounted cash flow model considers portfolio characteristics, contractually specified servicing fees, prepayment speed assumptions, delinquency rates, costs to service, late charges, and other ancillary revenue, and other economic factors such as interest rates. The fair value of MSRs is sensitive to changes in interest rates, including the effect on prepayment speeds. MSRs typically decrease in value when interest rates decline as declining interest rates tend to increase prepayments and therefore reduce the expected life of the net servicing cash flows that make up the MSR asset.

Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities not measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2014



(Expressed in thousands)
					Fair Value Measurement: Assets
	As of September 30, 2014				As of September 30, 2014
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash	$	44,578	$	44,578	$	44,578	$	—	$	—	$	44,578
Cash segregated for regulatory and other purposes	19,106		19,106		19,106		—		—		19,106
Deposits with clearing organization	15,016		15,016		15,016		—		—		15,016
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
Securities borrowed	267,643		267,643		—		267,643		—		267,643
Receivables from brokers	52,616		52,616		—		52,616		—		52,616
Securities failed to deliver	24,476		24,476		—		24,476		—		24,476
Clearing organizations	21,705		21,705		—		21,705		—		21,705
Other	14,503		14,503		—		14,503		—		14,503
	380,943		380,943		—		380,943		—		380,943
Receivable from customers	883,133		883,133		—		883,133		—		883,133
Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”)	29,496		41,768		—		—		41,768		41,768
Escrow deposit⁽¹⁾	25,014		25,014		25,014		—		—		25,014


(1)	Included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Represents escrow monies deposited with a commercial bank. Corresponds with payable to third party in accounts payable and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet (see note 3 below).



(Expressed in thousands)
					Fair Value Measurement: Liabilities
	As of September 30, 2014				As of September 30, 2014
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Drafts payable	$	24,316	$	24,316	$	24,316	$	—	$	—	$	24,316
Bank call loans	135,500		135,500		135,500		—		—		135,500
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
Securities loaned	164,095		164,095		—		164,095		—		164,095
Securities failed to receive	32,297		32,297		—		32,297		—		32,297
Clearing organizations and other	8,558		8,558		—		8,558		—		8,558
	204,950		204,950		—		204,950		—		204,950
Payables to customers	689,363		689,363		—		689,363		—		689,363
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	688,310		688,310		—		688,310		—		688,310
Accounts payable and other liabilities
Warehouse payable ⁽²⁾	17,540		17,540		—		17,540		—		17,540
Payable to third party ⁽³⁾	25,014		25,014		25,014		—		—		25,014
Senior secured notes	150,000		158,063		—		158,063		—		158,063

(2)

Warehouse payable represents loans outstanding under a warehouse facility provided by a commercial bank but prior to GNMA securitization. The borrowing rate on the warehouse facility is based upon a variable interest rate of 1 month LIBOR plus a spread. The carrying amounts approximate fair value because of the short maturity of these instruments. This warehouse facility is used to fund loans held for sale on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


(3)	Corresponds with escrow deposit in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet (see note 1 above).

Table of Contents

Assets and liabilities not measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of December 31, 2013



(Expressed in thousands)
					Fair Value Measurement: Assets
	As of December 31, 2013				As of December 31, 2013
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Cash	$	38,026	$	38,026	$	38,026	$	—	$	—	$	38,026
Cash segregated for regulatory and other purposes	24,828		24,828		24,828		—		—		24,828
Deposits with clearing organization	13,187		13,187		13,187		—		—		13,187
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
Deposits paid for securities borrowed	274,127		274,127		—		274,127		—		274,127
Receivables from brokers	49,803		49,803		—		49,803		—		49,803
Securities failed to deliver	9,628		9,628		—		9,628		—		9,628
Clearing organizations	27		27		—		27		—		27
Omnibus accounts	18,086		18,086		—		18,086		—		18,086
Other	13,202		13,202		—		13,202		—		13,202
	364,873		364,873		—		364,873		—		364,873
Receivable from customers	868,869		868,869		—		868,869		—		868,869
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	825		825		825		—		—		825
Mortgage servicing rights (“MSRs”)	28,879		40,084		—		—		40,084		40,084
Escrow deposit ⁽¹⁾	25,006		25,006		25,006		—		—		25,006


(1)	Included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Represents escrow monies deposited with a commercial bank. Corresponds with payable to third party in accounts payable and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet (see note 3 below).



(Expressed in thousands)
					Fair Value Measurement: Liabilities
	As of December 31, 2013				As of December 31, 2013
	Carrying Value		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total
Drafts payable	$	48,198	$	48,198	$	48,198	$	—	$	—	$	48,198
Bank call loans	118,200		118,200		118,200		—		—		118,200
Payables to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations
Deposits received for securities loaned	211,621		211,621		—		211,621		—		211,621
Securities failed to receive	5,346		5,346		—		5,346		—		5,346
Clearing organizations and other	6,348		6,348		—		6,348		—		6,348
	223,315		223,315		—		223,315		—		223,315
Payables to customers	626,564		626,564		—		626,564		—		626,564
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	757,491		757,491		—		757,491		—		757,491
Accounts payable and other liabilities
Warehouse payable ⁽²⁾	54,614		54,614		—		54,614		—		54,614
Payable to third party ⁽³⁾	25,006		25,006		25,006		—		—		25,006
Senior secured notes	195,000		208,529		—		208,529		—		208,529

(2)


(3)	Corresponds with escrow deposit in other assets on the consolidated balance sheet (see note 1 above).

Table of Contents

Fair Value Option

The Company has the option to measure certain financial assets and financial liabilities at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in earnings each period. The Company may make a fair value option election on an instrument-by-instrument basis at initial recognition of an asset or liability or upon an event that gives rise to a new basis of accounting for that instrument. The Company has elected to apply the fair value option to its loan trading portfolio which resides in OPY Credit Corp. and is included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Management has elected this treatment as it is consistent with the manner in which the business is managed as well as the way that financial instruments in other parts of the business are recorded. There were no loan positions held in the secondary loan trading portfolio at September 30, 2014 or December 31, 2013.

The Company elected the fair value option for repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements that do not settle overnight or have an open settlement date. The Company has elected the fair value option for these instruments to more accurately reflect market and economic events in its earnings and to mitigate a potential imbalance in earnings caused by using different measurement attributes (i.e. fair value versus carrying value) for certain assets and liabilities. At September 30, 2014, the fair value of the reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements were $250.0 million and $nil, respectively.

On October 1, 2013, the Company also elected the fair value option for loans held for sale which reside in OMHHF and are reported on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Loans held for sale represent originated loans that are generally transferred or sold within 60 days from the date that a mortgage loan is funded. Electing to use fair value allows a better offset of the change in fair value of the loan and the change in fair value of the derivative instruments used as economic hedges. During the period prior to its sale, interest income on a loan held for sale is calculated in accordance with the terms of the individual loan. At September 30, 2014, the Company did not carry any loans held for sale for a period longer than 90 days. At September 30, 2014, the book value and fair value of loans held for sale was $20.0 million and $20.1 million, respectively.

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

The Company transacts, on a limited basis, in exchange traded and over-the-counter derivatives for both asset and liability management as well as for trading and investment purposes. Risks managed using derivative instruments include interest rate risk and, to a lesser extent, foreign exchange risk. All derivative instruments are measured at fair value and are recognized as either assets or liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Cash flow hedges used for asset and liability management

For derivative instruments that were designated and qualify as a cash flow hedge, the effective portion of the gain or loss on the derivative was reported as a component of other comprehensive income and reclassified into earnings in the same period or periods during which the hedged transaction affects earnings. Gains or losses on the derivative representing either hedge ineffectiveness or hedge components excluded from the assessment of effectiveness are recognized in current earnings. At September 30, 2014, there were no derivative instruments that were designated and qualified as a cash flow hedge.

Foreign exchange hedges

From time to time, the Company also utilizes forward and options contracts to hedge the foreign currency risk associated with compensation obligations to Oppenheimer Israel (OPCO) Ltd. employees denominated in New Israeli Shekels. Such hedges have not been designated as accounting hedges.

Derivatives used for trading and investment purposes

Futures contracts represent commitments to purchase or sell securities or other commodities at a future date and at a specified price. Market risk exists with respect to these instruments. Notional or contractual amounts are used to express the volume of these transactions and do not represent the amounts potentially subject to market risk. The futures contracts the Company uses including U.S. Treasury notes, Federal funds, General collateral futures and Eurodollar contracts are used primarily as an economic hedge of interest rate risk associated with government trading activities.

Table of Contents

Derivatives used for commercial mortgage banking

In the normal course of business, OMHHF enters into contractual commitments to originate (purchase) and sell multifamily mortgage loans at fixed prices with fixed expiration dates. The commitments become effective when the borrowers “lock-in” a specified interest rate within time frames established by OMHHF. All mortgagors are evaluated for credit worthiness prior to the extension of the commitment. Market risk arises if interest rates move adversely between the time of the “lock-in” of rates by the borrower and the sale date of the loan to an investor. To mitigate the effect of the interest rate risk inherent in providing rate lock commitments to borrowers, OMHHF’s policy is to enter into a TBA sale contract with the investor simultaneously with the rate lock commitment with the borrower. The TBA sale contract with the investor locks in an interest rate and price for the sale of the loan. The terms of the contract with the investor and the rate lock with the borrower are matched in substantially all respects, with the objective of eliminating interest rate risk to the extent practical. TBA sale contracts with the investors have an expiration date that is longer than our related commitments to the borrower to allow, among other things, for the closing of the loan and processing of paperwork to deliver the loan into the sale commitment.

Both the rate lock commitments to borrowers and the TBA sale contracts to buyers are undesignated derivatives and, accordingly, are marked to fair value through earnings. The fair value of the Company’s rate lock commitments to borrowers and loans held for sale and the related input includes, as applicable:


•	the assumed gain/loss of the expected resultant loan sale to the buyer;


•	the expected net future cash flows associated with servicing the loan;


•	the effects of interest rate movements between the date of the rate lock and the balance sheet date; and


•	the nonperformance risk of both the counterparty and the Company.

The fair value of the Company’s TBA sale contracts to investors considers effects of interest rate movements between the trade date and the balance sheet date. The market price changes are multiplied by the notional amount of the TBA sale contracts to measure the fair value.

The assumed gain/loss considers the amount that the Company has discounted the price to the borrower from par for competitive reasons, if at all, and the expected net cash flows from servicing to be received upon securitization of the loan. The fair value of the expected net future cash flows associated with servicing the loan is calculated pursuant to the valuation techniques described previously for MSRs.

To calculate the effects of interest rate movements, the Company uses applicable published U.S. Treasury prices, and multiplies the price movement between the rate lock date and the balance sheet date by the notional loan commitment amount.

The fair value of the Company’s TBA sale contracts to investors considers the market price movement of the same type of security between the trade date and the balance sheet date. The market price changes are multiplied by the notional amount of the TBA sale contracts to measure the fair value.

The fair value of the Company’s interest rate lock commitments and TBA sale contracts is adjusted to reflect the risk that the agreement will not be fulfilled. The Company’s exposure to nonperformance in rate lock and TBA sale contracts is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. Given the credit quality of our counterparties, the short duration of interest rate lock commitments and TBA sale contracts, and the Company’s historical experience with the agreements, the risk of nonperformance by the Company’s counterparties is not significant.

TBA Securities

The Company also transacts in pass-through mortgage-backed securities eligible to be sold in the TBA market as economic hedges against mortgage-backed securities that it owns or has sold but not yet purchased. TBAs provide for the forward or delayed delivery of the underlying instrument with settlement up to 180 days. The contractual or notional amounts related to these financial instruments reflect the volume of activity and do not reflect the amounts at risk. Unrealized gains and losses on TBAs are recorded in the condensed consolidated balance sheets in receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations and payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations, respectively, and in the condensed consolidated statements of income as principal transactions revenue, net.

Table of Contents

The notional amounts and fair values of the Company’s derivatives at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 by product were as follows:



(Expressed in thousands)
	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments at September 30, 2014
	Description	Notional		Fair Value
Assets:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments ⁽¹⁾
Other contracts	TBAs	$	86,631	$	63
	TBA sale contracts	213,371		1,711
	Interest rate lock commitments	139,947		5,511
		$	439,949	$	7,285
Liabilities:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments ⁽¹⁾
Commodity contracts ⁽²⁾	U.S. Treasury futures	$	72,000	$	87
	Federal funds futures	3,950,000		135
	Eurodollars futures	300,000		60
	General collateral futures	225,000		2
Other contracts	TBAs	81,973		33
	Interest rate lock commitments	51,106		3,188
	Forward start repurchase agreements	181,000		—
	ARS purchase commitments ⁽³⁾	13,072		1,037
		$	4,874,151	$	4,542


(1)	See “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” above for description of derivative financial instruments. Such derivative instruments are not subject to master netting agreements, thus the related amounts are not offset.


(2)	Included in payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


(3)	Included in accounts payable and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Table of Contents



(Expressed in thousands)
	Fair Value of Derivative Instruments at December 31, 2013
	Description	Notional		Fair Value
Assets:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments ⁽¹⁾
Other contracts	TBAs	$	25,262	$	134
	TBA sale contracts	266,415		2,021
	Interest rate lock commitments	115,569		2,375
		$	407,246	$	4,530
Liabilities:
Derivatives not designated as hedging instruments ⁽¹⁾
Commodity contracts ⁽²⁾	U.S. Treasury futures	$	60,000	$	186
	Federal funds futures	6,155,000		18
	Eurodollars futures	347,000		44
Other contracts	TBAs	14,547		73
	Interest rate lock commitments	76,604		3,653
	Forward start repurchase agreements	506,000		—
	ARS purchase commitments ⁽³⁾	29,056		2,600
		$	7,188,207	$	6,574


(1)	See “Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities” above for description of derivative financial instruments. Such derivative instruments are not subject to master netting agreements, thus the related amounts are not offset.


(2)	Included in payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.


(3)	Included in accounts payable and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The following table presents the location and fair value amounts of the Company’s derivative instruments and their effect on the condensed consolidated statements of income for the three months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:



(Expressed in thousands)
	The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Income
	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
		Recognized in Income on Derivatives (pre-tax)
Types	Description	Location	Gain (Loss)
Commodity contracts	U.S. Treasury futures	Principal transactions revenue	$	20
	Federal funds futures	Principal transactions revenue	(119		)
	Eurodollars futures	Principal transactions revenue	(4		)
	General collateral futures	Principal transactions revenue	(2		)
Other contracts	TBAs	Principal transactions revenue	156
	TBAs sale contracts	Other	3,461
	Interest rate lock commitments	Other	(4,372		)
	ARS purchase commitments	Principal transactions revenue	477
			$	(383	)

Table of Contents



(Expressed in thousands)
	The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Income
	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2013
		Recognized in Income on Derivatives (pre-tax)
Types	Description	Location	Gain (Loss)
Commodity contracts	U.S. Treasury futures	Principal transactions revenue	$	(356	)
	Federal funds futures	Principal transactions revenue	(235		)
	Eurodollars futures	Principal transactions revenue	(36		)
Other contracts	TBAs	Principal transactions revenue	(243		)
	TBA sale contracts	Other	(6,518		)
	ARS purchase commitments	Principal transactions revenue	(83		)
			$	(7,471	)



(Expressed in thousands)
	The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Income
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
		Recognized in Income on Derivatives (pre-tax)
Types	Description	Location	Gain (Loss)
Commodity contracts	U.S. Treasury futures	Principal transactions revenue	$	(1,040	)
	Federal funds futures	Principal transactions revenue	(272		)
	Eurodollars futures	Principal transactions revenue	(120		)
	General Collateral Futures	Principal transactions revenue	(2		)
Other contracts	TBAs	Principal transactions revenue	132
	TBAs sale contracts	Other	(310		)
	Interest rate lock commitments	Other	3,601
	ARS purchase commitments	Principal transactions revenue	1,563
			$	3,552



(Expressed in thousands)
	The Effect of Derivative Instruments on the Statement of Income
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2013
		Recognized in Income on Derivatives (pre-tax)
Types	Description	Location	Gain (Loss)
Commodity contracts	U.S. Treasury futures	Principal transactions revenue	$	446
	Federal funds futures	Principal transactions revenue	(287		)
	Eurodollars futures	Principal transactions revenue	35
Other contracts	TBAs	Principal transactions revenue	12
	TBA sale contracts	Other	(5,926		)
	ARS purchase commitments	Principal transactions revenue	235
			$	(5,485	)

Table of Contents

6. Collateralized transactions

The Company enters into collateralized borrowing and lending transactions in order to meet customers’ needs and earn residual interest rate spreads, obtain securities for settlement and finance trading inventory positions. Under these transactions, the Company either receives or provides collateral, including U.S. government and agency, asset-backed, corporate debt, equity, and non-U.S. government and agency securities.

The Company obtains short-term borrowings primarily through bank call loans. Bank call loans are generally payable on demand and bear interest at various rates but not exceeding the broker call rate. At September 30, 2014, bank call loans were $135.5 million ($118.2 million at December 31, 2013).

At September 30, 2014, the Company had collateralized loans, collateralized by firm and customer securities with market values of approximately $125.3 million and $148.9 million, respectively, with commercial banks. At September 30, 2014, the Company had approximately $1.3 billion of customer securities under customer margin loans that are available to be pledged, of which the Company has re-pledged approximately $134.2 million under securities loan agreements.

At September 30, 2014, the Company had deposited $360.6 million of customer securities directly with the Options Clearing Corporation to secure obligations and margin requirements under option contracts written by customers.

At September 30, 2014, the Company had no outstanding letters of credit.

The Company enters into reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements, securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions to, among other things, acquire securities to cover short positions and settle other securities obligations, to accommodate customers’ needs and to finance the Company’s inventory positions. Except as described below, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, principally involving government and agency securities, are carried at amounts at which the securities subsequently will be resold or reacquired as specified in the respective agreements and include accrued interest. Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis, when the repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are executed with the same counterparty, have the same explicit settlement date, are executed in accordance with a master netting arrangement, the securities underlying the repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements exist in “book entry” form and certain other requirements are met.

Table of Contents

The following tables present the gross amounts and the offsetting amounts of reverse repurchase agreements, repurchase agreements, securities borrowed and securities loaned transactions as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



As of September 30, 2014
(Expressed in thousands)
								Gross Amounts Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet			Net Amounts of Assets Presented on the Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Reverse repurchase agreements	$	349,680	$	(99,680	)	$	250,000	$	(250,000	)	$	—	$	—
Securities borrowed ⁽¹⁾	267,643		—			267,643		(258,001		)	—		9,642
Total	$	617,323	$	(99,680	)	$	517,643	$	(508,001	)	$	—	$	9,642


(1)	Included in receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.



								Gross Amounts Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet			Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented on the Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
Repurchase agreements	$	787,990	$	(99,680	)	$	688,310	$	(686,659	)	$	—	$	1,651
Securities loaned ⁽²⁾	164,095		—			164,095		(157,859		)	—		6,236
Total	$	952,085	$	(99,680	)	$	852,405	$	(844,518	)	$	—	$	7,887


(2)	Included in payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.



As of December 31, 2013
(Expressed in thousands)
								Gross Amounts Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Assets		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet			Net Amounts of Assets Presented on the Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Received		Net Amount
Reverse repurchase agreements	$	389,439	$	(204,614	)	$	184,825	$	(183,305	)	$	—	$	1,520
Securities borrowed ⁽¹⁾	274,127		—			274,127		(265,936		)	—		8,191
Total	$	663,566	$	(204,614	)	$	458,952	$	(449,241	)	$	—	$	9,711


(1)	Included in receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.



								Gross Amounts Not Offset on the Balance Sheet
	Gross Amounts of Recognized Liabilities		Gross Amounts Offset in the Balance Sheet			Net Amounts of Liabilities Presented on the Balance Sheet		Financial Instruments			Cash Collateral Pledged		Net Amount
Repurchase agreements	$	962,105	$	(204,614	)	$	757,491	$	(753,003	)	$	—	$	4,488
Securities loaned ⁽²⁾	211,621		—			211,621		(204,971		)	—		6,650
Total	$	1,173,726	$	(204,614	)	$	969,112	$	(957,974	)	$	—	$	11,138


(2)	Included in payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Table of Contents

Certain of the Company’s repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements are carried at fair value as a result of the Company’s fair value option election. The Company elected the fair value option for those repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements that do not settle overnight or have an open settlement date. The Company has elected the fair value option for these instruments to more accurately reflect market and economic events in its earnings and to mitigate a potential imbalance in earnings caused by using different measurement attributes (i.e. fair value versus carrying value) for certain assets and liabilities. At September 30, 2014, the fair value of the reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements was $250 million and $nil, respectively.

The Company receives collateral in connection with securities borrowed and reverse repurchase agreement transactions and customer margin loans. Under many agreements, the Company is permitted to sell or re-pledge the securities received (e.g., use the securities to enter into securities lending transactions, or deliver to counterparties to cover short positions). At September 30, 2014, the fair value of securities received as collateral under securities borrowed transactions and reverse repurchase agreements was $259.2 million ($265.3 million at December 31, 2013) and $349.5 million ($385.5 million at December 31, 2013), respectively, of which the Company has sold and re-pledged approximately $21.9 million ($11.0 million at December 31, 2013) under securities loaned transactions and $349.5 million under repurchase agreements ($385.5 million at December 31, 2013).

The Company pledges certain of its securities owned for securities lending and repurchase agreements and to collateralize bank call loan transactions. The carrying value of pledged securities owned that can be sold or re-pledged by the counterparty was $498.9 million, as presented on the face of the condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2014 ($586.6 million at December 31, 2013). The carrying value of securities owned by the Company that have been loaned or pledged to counterparties where those counterparties do not have the right to sell or re-pledge the collateral was $127.9 million at September 30, 2014 ($126.8 million at December 31, 2013).

The Company manages credit exposure arising from repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements by, in appropriate circumstances, entering into master netting agreements and collateral arrangements with counterparties that provide the Company, in the event of a customer default, the right to liquidate and the right to offset a counterparty’s rights and obligations. The Company also monitors the market value of collateral held and the market value of securities receivable from others. It is the Company’s policy to request and obtain additional collateral when exposure to loss exists. In the event the counterparty is unable to meet its contractual obligation to return the securities, the Company may be exposed to off-balance sheet risk of acquiring securities at prevailing market prices.

As of December 31, 2011, the interest in securities formerly held by one of the Company’s funds which utilized Lehman Brothers International (Europe) as a prime broker was transferred to an investment trust. On September 26, 2013, the first interim distribution in the amount of $9.5 million was received by the trust and distributed to its members. During the first quarter of 2014, a subsequent distribution in the amount of $600,000 was received by the trust and distributed to its members. The 2014 payment substantially completes the Company’s claim on the Lehman Brothers Estate.

Credit Concentrations

Credit concentrations may arise from trading, investing, underwriting and financing activities and may be impacted by changes in economic, industry or political factors. In the normal course of business, the Company may be exposed to risk in the event customers, counterparties including other brokers and dealers, issuers, banks, depositories or clearing organizations are unable to fulfill their contractual obligations. The Company seeks to mitigate these risks by actively monitoring exposures and obtaining collateral as deemed appropriate. Included in receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations as of September 30, 2014 are receivables from three major U.S. broker-dealers totaling approximately $135.7 million.

Warehouse Facilities

Through OPY Credit Corp., the Company utilized a warehouse facility provided by Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”) to extend financing commitments to third party borrowers identified by the Company. This warehouse arrangement terminated on July 15, 2012. However, the Company will remain contingently liable for some minimal expenses in relation to this facility related to commitments made by CIBC to borrowers introduced by the Company until such borrowings are repaid by the borrowers or until 2016, whichever is the sooner to occur. All such owed amounts will continue to be reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of income as incurred.

The Company reached an agreement with RBS Citizens, NA (“Citizens”) that was announced in July 2012, whereby the Company, through OPY Credit Corp., will introduce lending opportunities to Citizens, which Citizens can elect to accept and in which the Company will participate in the fees earned from any related commitment by Citizens. The Company can also in

Table of Contents

certain circumstances assume a portion of Citizen’s syndication and lending risk under such loans, and if it does so it shall be obligated to secure such obligations via a cash deposit determined through risk-based formulas. Neither the Company nor Citizens is obligated to make any specific loan or to commit any minimum amount of lending capacity to the relationship. The agreement also calls for Citizens and the Company at their option to jointly participate in the arrangement of various loan syndications. At September 30, 2014, there were no loans in place.

The Company is obligated to settle transactions with brokers and other financial institutions even if its clients fail to meet their obligations to the Company. Clients are required to complete their transactions on the settlement date, generally one to three business days after the trade date. If clients do not fulfill their contractual obligations, the Company may incur losses. The Company has clearing/participating arrangements with the National Securities Clearing Corporation (“NSCC”), the Fixed Income Clearing Corporation (“FICC”), R.J. O’Brien & Associates (commodities transactions) and others. With respect to its business in reverse repurchase and repurchase agreements, substantially all open contracts at September 30, 2014 are with the FICC. In addition, the Company began clearing its non-U.S. international equities business carried on by Oppenheimer Europe Ltd. and Oppenheimer Investments Asia Limited through BNP Paribas Securities Services and its non-U.S. international equities business carried on by Oppenheimer through BNP Securities Corp. The clearing corporations have the right to charge the Company for losses that result from a client’s failure to fulfill its contractual obligations. Accordingly, the Company has credit exposures with these clearing brokers. The clearing brokers can re-hypothecate the securities held on behalf of the Company. As the right to charge the Company has no maximum amount and applies to all trades executed through the clearing brokers, the Company believes there is no maximum amount assignable to this right. At September 30, 2014, the Company had recorded no liabilities with regard to this right. The Company’s policy is to monitor the credit standing of the clearing brokers and banks with which it conducts business.

OMHHF, which is engaged in commercial mortgage origination and servicing, has obtained an uncommitted warehouse facility line through PNC Bank (“PNC”) under which OMHHF pledges FHA-guaranteed mortgages for a period averaging 15 business days and PNC table funds the principal payment to the mortgagee. OMHHF repays PNC upon the securitization of the mortgage by the GNMA and the delivery of the security to the counter-party for payment pursuant to a contemporaneous sale on the date the mortgage is securitized. At September 30, 2014, OMHHF had $17.5 million outstanding under the warehouse facility line at a variable interest rate of 1 month LIBOR plus a spread. Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $181,000 and $400,000, respectively ($183,000 and $616,000, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013). The Company’s ability to originate mortgage loans depends upon its ability to secure and maintain these types of short-term financings on acceptable terms.

As discussed in Note 5, Financial instruments, the Company enters into TBA sale contracts to offset exposures related to commitments to provide funding for FHA loans at OMHHF. In the normal course of business, the Company may be exposed to the risk that counterparties to these TBA sale contracts are unable to fulfill their contractual obligations.

7. Variable interest entities ("VIEs")

The Company’s policy is to consolidate all subsidiaries in which it has a controlling financial interest, as well as any VIEs where the Company is deemed to be the primary beneficiary, when it has the power to make the decisions that most significantly affect the economic performance of the VIE and has the obligation to absorb significant losses or the right to receive benefits that could potentially be significant to the VIE. The Company reviews factors, including the rights of the equity holders and obligations of equity holders to absorb losses or receive expected residual returns, to determine if the investee is a VIE. In evaluating whether the Company is the primary beneficiary, the Company evaluates its economic interests in the entity held either directly or indirectly by the Company. The consolidation analysis is generally performed qualitatively. This analysis, which requires judgment, is performed at each reporting date. ASU No. 2010-10, “Amendments for Certain Investment Funds,” defers the application of the revised consolidation rules for a reporting entity’s interest in an entity if certain conditions are met. An entity that qualifies for the deferral will continue to be assessed for consolidation under the overall guidance on VIEs, before its amendment, and other applicable consolidation guidance. Generally, the Company would consolidate those entities when it absorbs a majority of the expected losses or a majority of the expected residual returns, or both, of the entities.

For entities that the Company has concluded are not VIEs, the Company then evaluates whether the fund is a partnership or similar entity. If the fund is a partnership or similar entity, the Company evaluates the fund under the partnership consolidation guidance. Pursuant to that guidance, the Company consolidates funds in which it is the general partner, unless presumption of control by the Company can be overcome. This presumption is overcome only when unrelated investors in the fund have the substantive ability to liquidate the fund or otherwise remove the Company as the general partner without cause, based on a simple majority vote of unaffiliated investors, or have other substantive participating rights. If the presumption of control can be overcome, the Company accounts for its interest in the fund pursuant to the equity method of accounting.

Table of Contents

A subsidiary of the Company serves as general partner of hedge funds and private equity funds that were established for the purpose of providing investment alternatives to both its institutional and qualified retail clients. The Company holds variable interests in these funds as a result of its right to receive management and incentive fees. The Company’s investment in and additional capital commitments to these hedge funds and private equity funds are also considered variable interests. The Company’s additional capital commitments are subject to call at a later date and are limited in amount.

The Company assesses whether it is the primary beneficiary of the hedge funds and private equity funds in which it holds a variable interest in the form of the total general and limited partner interests held in these funds by all parties. In each instance, the Company has determined that it is not the primary beneficiary and therefore need not consolidate the hedge funds or private equity funds. The subsidiaries’ general partnership interests, additional capital commitments, and management fees receivable represent its maximum exposure to loss. The subsidiaries’ general partnership interests and management fees receivable are included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

The following tables set forth the total VIE assets, the carrying value of the subsidiaries’ variable interests, and the Company’s maximum exposure to loss in Company-sponsored non-consolidated VIEs in which the Company holds variable interests and other non-consolidated VIEs in which the Company holds variable interests at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013:



(Expressed in thousands)
	September 30, 2014
									Maximum Exposure to Loss in Non-consolidated VIEs
			Carrying Value of the
	Total		Company’s Variable Interest				Capital
	VIE Assets ⁽¹⁾		Assets ⁽²⁾		Liabilities		Commitments
Hedge funds	$	1,870,079	$	3,788	$	—	$	—	$	3,788
Private equity funds	76,900		31		—		2		33
Total	$	1,946,979	$	3,819	$	—	$	2	$	3,821


(1)	Represents the total assets of the VIEs and does not represent the Company’s interests in the VIEs.


(2)	Represents the Company’s interests in the VIEs and is included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.



(Expressed in thousands)
	December 31, 2013
									Maximum Exposure to Loss in Non-consolidated VIEs
			Carrying Value of the
	Total		Company’s Variable Interest				Capital
	VIE Assets ⁽¹⁾		Assets ⁽²⁾		Liabilities		Commitments
Hedge funds	$	2,282,144	$	738	$	—	$	—	$	738
Private equity funds	64,475		29		—		5		34
Total	$	2,346,619	$	767	$	—	$	5	$	772


(1)	Represents the total assets of the VIEs and does not represent the Company’s interests in the VIEs.


(2)	Represents the Company’s interests in the VIEs and is included in other assets on the condensed consolidated balance sheet.

Table of Contents

8. Commercial mortgage banking

OMHHF is engaged in the business of originating and servicing FHA insured multifamily and healthcare facility loans and securitizing these loans into GNMA mortgage backed securities. OMHHF also offers mortgage services to developers of commercial properties including apartments, elderly housing and nursing homes that satisfy FHA criteria. OMHHF maintains a mortgage servicing portfolio for which it provides a full array of services, including the collection of mortgage payments from mortgagors which are passed on to the mortgage holders, construction loan management and asset management.

The Company owns an 83.68% controlling interest in OMHHF. The 16.32% non-controlling interest belongs to one related third party who is the President and Chief Executive Officer of OMHHF.

Loan Origination Fees

OMHHF receives origination fees and incurs other direct origination costs when it originates mortgage loans. The origination fees and other direct origination costs are recognized when OMHHF enters into a commitment to sell loans to third parties.

In accordance with HUD guidelines, OMHHF will, with HUD's approval and for certain loan programs, apply the premium income towards the payment of prepayment costs that customers will incur on their prior mortgage. These costs are netted with revenues from premium income that are otherwise earned from these loan refinancings or modifications. Prepayment costs recorded as contra-revenue against premium income were $2.6 million and $4.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively ($2.8 million and $13.5 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively).

Funding Commitments

OMHHF provides its clients with commitments to fund FHA-insured permanent or constructions loans. Upon providing these commitments to fund, OMHHF enters into TBA sale contracts directly or indirectly with counterparties to offset its exposures related to these funding commitments. See Note 5, Financial instruments, for more information.

Loans Held For Sale

OMHHF advances funds from its own cash reserves in addition to obtaining financing through warehouse facilities in order to fund initial loan closing and subsequent construction loan draws. Prior to the GNMA securitization of a loan, a loan held for sale is recorded on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. To the extent funds were advanced from its own cash reserves, the cash balance is reduced in an equal amount. To the extent funds were financed through the warehouse facility, a liability for the warehouse facility payable is recorded in other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet. Loans held for sale are recorded at fair value through earnings.

Table of Contents

Escrows Held in Trust

Custodial escrow accounts relating to loans serviced by OMHHF totaled $286.5 million at September 30, 2014 ($251.4 million at December 31, 2013). These amounts are not included on the condensed consolidated balance sheets as such amounts are not OMHHF’s assets. Certain cash deposits at financial institutions exceeded the FDIC insured limits. The combined uninsured balance with relation to escrow accounts at September 30, 2014 was approximately $167.7 million. OMHHF places these deposits with major financial institutions where they believe the risk is minimal and that meet or exceed GNMA required credit ratings.

The total unpaid principal balance of loans the Company was servicing for various institutional investors was as follows:



(Expressed in thousands)
	As of September 30, 2014		As of December 31, 2013
Unpaid principal balance of loans	$	4,044,961	$	3,885,437

Mortgage Servicing Rights (“MSRs”)

OMHHF purchases commitments or originates mortgage loans that are sold and securitized into GNMA mortgage backed securities. OMHHF retains the servicing responsibilities for the loans securitized and recognizes either a MSR asset or a MSR liability for that servicing contract. OMHHF receives monthly servicing fees equal to a percentage of the outstanding principal balance of the loans being serviced.

OMHHF estimates the initial fair value of the servicing rights based on the present value of future net servicing income, adjusted for factors such as discount rate and prepayment. See Note 5, Financial instruments, for more information. OMHHF uses the amortization method for subsequent measurement, subject to annual impairment. The Company reviews the capitalized MSRs for impairment quarterly by comparing the aggregate carrying value of the MSR portfolio to the aggregate estimated fair value of the portfolio.

The fair value of our MSRs is subject to market risk. Changes in interest rates influence a variety of assumptions included in the valuation of MSRs, including prepayment speeds, expected returns, the value of escrow balances and other servicing valuation elements. A decline in interest rates generally increases the payment rate of the servicing portfolio and therefore reduces the estimated fair value of MSRs.

The fair value of the servicing rights on the loan portfolio was $41.8 million and $40.1 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively (carrying value of $29.5 million and $28.9 million at September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively). The following table summarizes the changes in carrying value of MSRs for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:



(Expressed in thousands)
	Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013
Balance at beginning of period	$	28,879		$	26,983
Originations ⁽¹⁾	4,252			5,668
Purchases	144			1,108
Disposals ⁽¹⁾	(1,754		)	(4,518		)
Amortization expense	(2,025		)	(1,120		)
Balance at end of period	$	29,496		$	28,121


(1)	Includes refinancings.

Table of Contents

Servicing rights are amortized using the straight-line method over 10 years. Future amortization expense is expected to be as follows:



(Expressed in thousands)
	Originated MSRs		Purchased MSRs		Total MSRs
2014	$	704	$	319	$	1,023
2015	2,815		1,275		4,090
2016	2,808		1,275		4,083
2017	2,802		1,268		4,070
2018	2,775		1,255		4,030
Thereafter	9,071		3,129		12,200
	$	20,975	$	8,521	$	29,496

The Company receives fees during the course of servicing the mortgage loans. The fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013 were as follows:



(Expressed in thousands)
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
Servicing fees	$	1,402	$	1,287	$	4,122	$	3,739
Late fees	6		19		11		94
Ancillary fees	80		170		248		291
Total MSR fees	$	1,488	$	1,476	$	4,381	$	4,124

9. Long-term debt



(Expressed in thousands)
Issued	Maturity Date	At September 30, 2014		At December 31, 2013
Senior Secured Notes	4/15/2018	$	150,000	$	195,000

On April 12, 2011, the Company completed the private placement of $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.75% Senior Secured Notes due April 15, 2018 (the “Notes”) at par. The interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15th and October 15th. Proceeds from the private placement were used to retire the Senior Secured Credit Note due 2013 ($22.4 million) and the Subordinated Note due 2014 ($100.0 million) and for other general corporate purposes. The private placement resulted in the fixing of the interest rate over the term of the Notes compared to the variable rate debt that was retired and an extension of the debt maturity dates as described above. The Notes were non-callable until April 2014. The cost to issue the Notes was approximately $4.6 million which was capitalized in the second quarter of 2011 and is amortized over the period of the Notes. At September 30, 2014, the remaining unamortized debt issuance costs were $1.7 million.

The indenture for the Notes contains covenants which place restrictions on the incurrence of indebtedness, the payment of dividends, sale of assets, mergers and acquisitions and the granting of liens. The Notes provide for events of default including nonpayment, misrepresentation, breach of covenants and bankruptcy. The Company’s obligations under the Notes are guaranteed, subject to certain limitations, by the same subsidiaries that guaranteed the obligations under the Senior Secured Credit Note and the Subordinated Note which were retired. These guarantees may be shared, on a senior basis, under certain circumstances, with newly incurred debt outstanding in the future. At September 30, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all of its covenants.

On July 12, 2011, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4 filed to register the exchange of the Notes for fully registered Notes was declared effective by the SEC. The Exchange Offer was completed in its entirety on August 9, 2011.

On April 4, 2012, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed to enable the Company to act as a market maker in connection with the Notes was declared effective by the SEC.

Table of Contents

the Notes that it held. Upon completion of the redemption and retirement on April 15, 2014, $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes remains outstanding. The retirement of the Notes will reduce the Company’s interest costs by $3.9 million annually beginning in the second quarter of 2014.

Interest expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 on the Notes was $3.3 million and $11.0 million, respectively ($4.3 million and $12.8 million, respectively, for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013).

10. Share capital

The Company’s authorized share capital consists of (a) 50,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, par value $0.001 per share; (b) 50,000,000 shares of Class A non-voting common stock, par value $0.001 per share; and (c) 99,680 shares of Class B voting common stock, par value $0.001 per share. No Preferred Stock has been issued. 99,680 shares of Class B Stock have been issued and are outstanding.

The Class A Stock and the Class B Stock are equal in all respects except that the Class A Stock is non-voting.

The following table reflects changes in the number of shares of Class A Stock outstanding for the periods indicated:



	Three Months Ended September 30,			Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014	2013		2014	2013
Class A Stock outstanding, beginning of period	13,519,126	13,496,783		13,377,967	13,508,318
Issued pursuant to shared-based compensation plans	11,562	65,227		152,721	65,227
Repurchased and canceled pursuant to the stock buy-back	—	(119,251	)	—	(130,786	)
Class A Stock outstanding, end of period	13,530,688	13,442,759		13,530,688	13,442,759

Stock buy-back

On October 7, 2011, the Company announced its intention to purchase up to 675,000 shares of its Class A Stock in compliance with the rules and regulations of the New York Stock Exchange and the SEC and the terms of its outstanding long-term debt. The 675,000 shares represented approximately 5% of its then 13,572,265 issued and outstanding shares of Class A Stock. Any such purchases will be made by the Company in the open market at the prevailing open market price using cash on hand. All shares purchased will be cancelled. The repurchase program is expected to continue indefinitely. The repurchase program does not obligate the Company to repurchase any dollar amount or number of shares of Class A Stock. Depending on market conditions and other factors, these repurchases may be commenced or suspended from time to time without prior notice.

In the nine months ended September 30, 2014, the Company did not buy back any stock under this program. As of September 30, 2014, 352,823 shares were available to be purchased under this program.

11. Contingencies

Many aspects of the Company’s business involve substantial risks of liability. In the normal course of business, the Company has been named as defendant or co-defendant in various legal actions, including arbitrations, class actions, and other litigation, creating substantial exposure. Certain of the actual or threatened legal matters include claims for substantial compensatory and/or punitive damages or claims for indeterminate amounts of damages. These proceedings arise primarily from securities brokerage, asset management and investment banking activities. The Company is also involved, from time to time, in other reviews, investigations and proceedings (both formal and informal) by governmental and self-regulatory agencies regarding the Company’s business which may result in adverse judgments, settlements, fines, penalties, injunctions or other relief. The investigations include, among other things, inquiries from the SEC, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and various state regulators. The Company is named as a respondent in a number of arbitrations by its current or former clients as well as lawsuits related to its sale of ARS.

The Company accrues for estimated loss contingencies related to legal and regulatory matters when available information indicates that it is probable a liability had been incurred at the date of the condensed consolidated financial statements and the Company can reasonably estimate the amount of that loss. In many proceedings, however, it is inherently difficult to determine whether any loss is probable or even possible or to estimate the amount of any loss. In addition, even where loss is possible or an exposure to loss exists in excess of the liability already accrued with respect to a previously recognized loss contingency, it is often not possible to reasonably estimate the size of the possible loss or range of loss or possible additional losses or range of additional losses.

Table of Contents

For certain legal and regulatory proceedings, the Company cannot reasonably estimate such losses, particularly for proceedings that are in their early stages of development or where plaintiffs seek substantial, indeterminate or special damages. Numerous issues may need to be reviewed, analyzed or resolved, including through potentially lengthy discovery and determination of important factual matters, and by addressing novel or unsettled legal questions relevant to the proceedings in question, before a loss or range of loss or additional loss can be reasonably estimated for any proceeding. Even after lengthy review and analysis, the Company, in many legal and regulatory proceedings, may not be able to reasonably estimate possible losses or range of loss.

For certain other legal and regulatory proceedings, the Company can estimate possible losses, or, range of loss in excess of amounts accrued, but does not believe, based on current knowledge and after consultation with counsel, that such losses individually, or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements as a whole.

For legal and regulatory proceedings where there is at least a reasonable possibility that a loss or an additional loss may be incurred, the Company estimates a range of aggregate loss in excess of amounts accrued of $0 to approximately $33 million. This estimated aggregate range is based upon currently available information for those legal proceedings in which the Company is involved, where an estimate for such losses can be made. For certain cases, the Company does not believe that an estimate can currently be made. The foregoing estimate is based on various factors, including the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many are currently in preliminary stages), the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the proceedings and the attendant uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, the Company’s estimate will change from time to time, and actual losses may be more than the current estimate.

In February 2010, Oppenheimer finalized settlements with the Regulators concluding investigations and administrative proceedings by the Regulators concerning Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of ARS. Pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators, Oppenheimer agreed to extend offers to repurchase ARS from certain of its clients subject to certain terms and conditions more fully described below. In addition to the settlements with the Regulators, Oppenheimer has also reached settlements of and received adverse awards in legal proceedings with various clients where the Company is obligated to purchase ARS. Pursuant to completed Purchase Offers (as defined) under the settlements with the Regulators and client related legal settlements and awards to purchase ARS, as of September 30, 2014, the Company purchased and holds (net of redemptions) approximately $94.8 million in ARS from its clients. In addition, the Company is committed to purchase another $13.1 million in ARS from clients through 2016 under legal settlements and awards.

The Company’s purchases of ARS from its clients holding ARS eligible for repurchase will, subject to the terms and conditions of the settlements with the Regulators, continue on a periodic basis. Pursuant to these terms and conditions, the Company is required to conduct a financial review every six months, until the Company has extended Purchase Offers to all Eligible Investors (as defined), to determine whether it has funds available, after giving effect to the financial and regulatory capital constraints applicable to the Company, to extend additional Purchase Offers. The financial review is based on the Company’s operating results, regulatory net capital, liquidity, and other ARS purchase commitments outstanding under legal settlements and awards (described below). There are no predetermined quantitative thresholds or formulas used for determining the final agreed upon amount for the Purchase Offers. Upon completion of the financial review, the Company first meets with its primary regulator, FINRA, and then with representatives of the NYAG and other regulators to present the results of the review and to finalize the amount of the next Purchase Offer. Various offer scenarios are discussed in terms of which Eligible Investors should receive a Purchase Offer. The primary criteria to date in terms of determining which Eligible Investors should receive a Purchase Offer has been the amount of household account equity each Eligible Investor had with the Company in February 2008. Once various Purchase Offer scenarios have been discussed, the regulators, not the Company, make the final determination of which Purchase Offer scenario to implement. The terms of settlements provide that the amount of ARS to be purchased during any period shall not risk placing the Company in violation of regulatory requirements.

As of September 30, 2014, the Company did not have any outstanding ARS purchase commitments related to the settlements with the Regulators. Eligible Investors for future buybacks continued to hold approximately $106.1 million of principal value of ARS as of September 30, 2014. It is reasonably possible that some ARS Purchase Offers will need to be extended to Eligible Investors holding ARS prior to redemptions (or tender offers) by issuers of the full amount that remains outstanding. The potential additional losses that may result from entering into ARS purchase commitments with Eligible Investors for future buybacks represents the estimated difference between the principal value and the fair value. It is possible that the Company could sustain a loss of all or substantially all of the principal value of ARS still held by Eligible Investors but such an outcome is highly unlikely. The amount of potential additional losses resulting from entering into these commitments cannot be reasonably estimated due to the uncertainties surrounding the amounts and timing of future buybacks that result from the six-month financial review and the amounts, scope, and timing of future issuer redemptions and tender offers of ARS held by Eligible Investors. The range of potential additional losses related to valuation adjustments is between $0 and the amount of the

Table of Contents

estimated differential between the principal value and the fair value of ARS held by Eligible Investors for future buybacks that were not yet purchased or committed to be purchased by the Company at any point in time. The range of potential additional losses described here is not included in the estimated range of aggregate loss in excess of amounts accrued for legal and regulatory proceedings described above.

The Company is also named as a respondent in a number of arbitrations by its current or former clients as well as lawsuits related to its sale of ARS. If the ARS market remains frozen, the Company may likely be further subject to claims by its clients. There can be no guarantee that the Company will be successful in defending any or all of the current actions against it or any subsequent actions filed in the future. Any such failure could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition of the Company including its cash position.

The Company has sought, with limited success, financing from a number of sources to try to find a means for all its clients to find liquidity from their ARS holdings and will continue to do so. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in finding a liquidity solution for all its clients’ ARS.

On June 23, 2011, Oppenheimer received notice of an investigation by the SEC pursuant to which the SEC requested information from the Company regarding the sale of a number of low-priced securities effected primarily through several former Oppenheimer financial advisers and purchases and sales of low-priced securities through one Oppenheimer customer account. The issues and facts surrounding this investigation are, in the Company’s view, largely duplicative of a matter that was settled by Oppenheimer with FINRA in August of 2013. On July 16, 2013, Oppenheimer received a “Wells Notice” from the SEC requesting that Oppenheimer make a written submission to the SEC to explain why Oppenheimer should not be charged with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act") in relation to its sales of low-priced securities on behalf of former customers of the firm. The Company submitted a Wells response on August 19, 2013.

In October 2010, Oppenheimer received notice of an investigation by the SEC related to the trading of low-priced securities by one former financial advisor in one of Oppenheimer’s branch offices and the supervision related thereto. Both branch and headquarters personnel, including members of senior management, have provided on-the-record testimony in connection with the investigation.

The Company believes that the SEC may file one or more enforcement actions against Oppenheimer as well as certain members of management in connection with the investigations described in the two immediately preceding paragraphs.

In February, 2014, Oppenheimer received notice of an investigation by, and a request for information from, a division of the United States Department of the Treasury (“FinCEN”) relating to potential violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder related primarily to, in the Company’s view, the FINRA and SEC matters discussed immediately above. Oppenheimer provided information it believes is responsive to the FinCEN request for information in March of 2014. The Company believes that FinCEN may file an action or issue an assessment against the Company related to their investigation.

The Company continues to cooperate with and has had discussions about a potential resolution of these matters with the SEC and FinCEN. However, there can be no assurance that these discussions will lead to a resolution of any or all of these matters and, as noted above, the SEC and FinCEN could file one or more enforcement actions against the Company. The filing of one or more enforcement actions could have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations and could cause significant reputational harm to us which, in turn, could materially adversely impact our business prospects.

The Company recorded a $19.7 million charge against earnings related to the aforementioned matters during the six-month period ended June 30, 2014. As of September 30, 2014, the Company believes, subject to the paragraph immediately above, it is fully reserved against potential liability arising out of the SEC and FinCEN matters.

Table of Contents

12. Regulatory requirements

The Company’s U.S. broker dealer subsidiaries, Oppenheimer and Freedom, are subject to the uniform net capital requirements of the SEC under Rule 15c3-1 (the “Rule”) promulgated under the Exchange Act. Oppenheimer computes its net capital requirements under the alternative method provided for in the Rule which requires that Oppenheimer maintain net capital equal to two percent of aggregate customer-related debit items, as defined in SEC Rule 15c3-3. At September 30, 2014, the net capital of Oppenheimer as calculated under the Rule was $157.9 million or 11.8% of Oppenheimer’s aggregate debit items. This was $131.2 million in excess of the minimum required net capital at that date. Freedom computes its net capital requirement under the basic method provided for in the Rule, which requires that Freedom maintain net capital equal to the greater of $250,000 or 6-2/3% of aggregate indebtedness, as defined. At September 30, 2014, Freedom had net capital of $4.8 million, which was $4.5 million in excess of the $250,000 required to be maintained at that date.

The Company has computed a reserve requirement for the proprietary accounts of brokers as of September 30, 2014. The Company had no deposit requirements as of September 30, 2014.

At September 30, 2014, Freedom had $18.3 million in cash segregated under Federal and other regulations.

New Basel III requirements being implemented in the European Union have changed how capital adequacy is reported under the Capital Requirements Directive (CRD IV), effective January 1, 2014, for Oppenheimer Europe Ltd. At September 30, 2014, the capital required and held under CRD IV was as follows:


•	Common Equity Tier 1 ratio 8.93% (required 4.5%);


•	Tier 1 Capital ratio 8.93% (required 6.0%); and


•	Total Capital ratio 10.38% (required 8.0%).

At September 30, 2014, the regulatory capital of Oppenheimer Investments Asia Limited was $3.1 million, which was $2.7 million in excess of the $386,000 required to be maintained on that date. Oppenheimer Investments Asia Limited computes its regulatory capital pursuant to the requirements of the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong.

Table of Contents

13. Related party transactions

The Company does not make loans to its officers and directors except under normal commercial terms pursuant to client margin account agreements. These loans are fully collateralized by employee-owned securities.

14. Segment information

The Company has determined its reportable segments based on the Company’s method of internal reporting, which disaggregates its retail business by branch and its proprietary and investment banking businesses by product. The Company evaluates the performance of its reportable segments and allocates resources to them based upon profitability.

Due to the growth in the Company’s commercial loan origination and servicing business operated out of OMHHF, the Company has presented separately the results of this business in a reportable segment titled “Commercial Mortgage Banking.” This reportable segment engages in business activities in which it earns revenues and incurs expenses that are distinct from the Company’s other reportable segments, its operating results are reviewed by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer who makes decisions about resources to be allocated to this business, and separate financial information is available for the legal entity from which it operates. The Commercial Mortgage Banking reportable segment not only meets these qualitative criteria but, as a result of its recent growth, also meets one of the quantitative thresholds for segment reporting. Previously reported segment information has been revised to reflect this new reportable segment.

The Company’s reportable segments are:

Private Client—includes commissions and a proportionate amount of fee income earned on assets under management ("AUM"), net interest earnings on client margin loans and cash balances, fees from money market funds, net contributions from stock loan activities and financing activities, and direct expenses associated with this segment;

Asset Management—includes a proportionate amount of fee income earned on AUM from investment management services of Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc. Oppenheimer’s asset management divisions employ various programs to professionally manage client assets either in individual accounts or in funds, and includes direct expenses associated with this segment;

Capital Markets—includes investment banking, institutional equities sales, trading, and research, taxable fixed income sales, trading, and research, public finance and municipal trading, as well as the Company’s operations in the United Kingdom, Hong Kong and Israel, and direct expenses associated with this segment; and

Commercial Mortgage Banking—includes loan origination and servicing fees from the Company’s subsidiary, OMHHF. The Company has added this business segment due to the significant growth and profitability of this line of business over the last several quarters. In prior periods, this business had been part of the Capital Markets business segment.

The Company does not allocate costs associated with certain infrastructure support groups that are centrally managed for its reportable segments. These areas include, but are not limited to, legal, compliance, operations, accounting, and internal audit. Costs associated with these groups are separately reported in a Corporate/Other category and include, for example, compensation and benefits, rent expense, information technology, legal and professional.

The table below presents information about the reported revenue and net income before taxes of the Company for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013. Asset information by reportable segment is not reported, since the Company does not produce such information for internal use by the chief operating decision maker.

Table of Contents



(Expressed in thousands)
	Three Months Ended September 30,						Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013			2014			2013
Revenue
Private client *	$	142,606		$	144,316		$	435,770		$	430,963
Asset management *	24,801			21,488			74,443			64,450
Capital markets	71,226			68,460			221,324			201,495
Commercial mortgage banking	6,349			9,314			18,179			26,857
Corporate/Other	(303		)	(202		)	(180		)	2,587
Total	$	244,679		$	243,376		$	749,536		$	726,352
Income (loss) before income taxes
Private client *	$	18,898		$	15,088		$	36,766		$	48,113
Asset management *	8,264			6,387			24,300			20,332
Capital markets	5,699			4,301			23,965			8,806
Commercial mortgage banking	1,815			2,823			7,269			7,977
Corporate/Other	(23,780		)	(20,436		)	(76,159		)	(64,678		)
Total	$	10,896		$	8,163		$	16,141		$	20,550

* Asset management fees are allocated 22.5% to the Asset Management and 77.5% to the Private Client segments.

Revenue, classified by the major geographic areas in which it was earned for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, was as follows:



(Expressed in thousands)
	Three Months Ended September 30,				Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014		2013		2014		2013
United States	$	233,846	$	231,777	$	710,198	$	693,251
Europe/Middle East	9,106		9,210		32,983		26,930
Asia	1,256		1,309		5,024		2,843
South America	471		1,080		1,331		3,328
Total	$	244,679	$	243,376	$	749,536	$	726,352

15. Subsequent events

On October 31, 2014, the Company announced a quarterly dividend in the amount of $0.11 per share, payable on November 28, 2014 to holders of Class A Stock and Class B Stock of record on November 14, 2014.

Table of Contents

16. Condensed consolidating financial information

The Company’s Notes are jointly and severally and fully and unconditionally guaranteed on a senior basis by E.A. Viner International Co. and Viner Finance Inc. (together, the “Guarantors”), unless released as described below. Each of the Guarantors is 100% owned by the Company. The indenture for the Notes contains covenants with restrictions which are discussed in Note 9. The following consolidating financial statements present the financial position, results of operations and cash flows of the Company (referred to as “Parent” for purposes of this note only), the Guarantor subsidiaries, the Non-Guarantor subsidiaries and elimination entries necessary to consolidate the Company. Investments in subsidiaries are accounted for using the equity method for purposes of the consolidated presentation.

Each Guarantor will be automatically and unconditionally released and discharged upon: the sale, exchange or transfer of the capital stock of a Guarantor and the Guarantor ceasing to be a direct or indirect subsidiary of the Company if such sale does not constitute an asset sale under the indenture for the Notes or does not constitute an asset sale effected in compliance with the asset sale and merger covenants of the debenture for the Notes; a Guarantor being dissolved or liquidated; a Guarantor being designated unrestricted in compliance with the applicable provisions of the Notes; or the exercise by the Company of its legal defeasance option or covenant defeasance option or the discharge of the Company’s obligations under the indenture for the Notes in accordance with the terms of such indenture.

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

(Expressed in thousands)	Parent		Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	1,162	$	5,123		$	71,657		$	—		$	77,942
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes	—		—			19,106			—			19,106
Deposits with clearing organizations	—		—			31,611			—			31,611
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	—		—			380,943			—			380,943
Receivable from customers, net of allowance for credit losses of $2,451	—		—			883,133			—			883,133
Income tax receivable	26,600		27,371			(693		)	(45,477		)	7,801
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	—		—			250,000			—			250,000
Securities owned, including amounts pledged of $498,928, at fair value	—		5,694			801,078			—			806,772
Subordinated loan receivable	—		112,558			—			(112,558		)	—
Notes receivable, net	—		—			37,673			—			37,673
Office facilities, net	—		20,310			10,208			—			30,518
Deferred tax assets, net	21		309			26,102			(26,432		)	—
Intangible assets	—		—			31,700			—			31,700
Goodwill	—		—			137,889			—			137,889
Loans held for sale	—		—			20,095			—			20,095
Mortgage servicing rights	—		—			29,496			—			29,496
Other assets	1,839		27,077			102,148			—			131,064
Investment in subsidiaries	561,539		881,012			(179,607		)	(1,262,944		)	—
Intercompany receivables	93,926		(19,048		)	(12,175		)	(62,703		)	—
Total assets	$	685,087	$	1,060,406		$	2,640,364		$	(1,510,114	)	$	2,875,743
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Drafts payable	$	—	$	—		$	24,316		$	—		$	24,316
Bank call loans	—		—			135,500			—			135,500
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	—		—			204,950			—			204,950
Payable to customers	—		—			689,363			—			689,363
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	—		—			688,310			—			688,310
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value	—		—			128,262			—			128,262
Accrued compensation	—		—			138,782			—			138,782
Accounts payable and other liabilities	6,086		58,392			105,697			—			170,175
Income tax payable	2,440		22,189			20,848			(45,477		)	—
Senior secured notes	150,000		—			—			—			150,000
Subordinated indebtedness	—		—			112,558			(112,558		)	—
Deferred tax liabilities, net	—		12			39,939			(26,432		)	13,519
Intercompany payables	—		62,703			—			(62,703		)	—
Total liabilities	158,526		143,296			2,288,525			(247,170		)	2,343,177
Stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	526,561		917,110			345,834			(1,262,944		)	526,561
Non-controlling interest	—		—			6,005			—			6,005
Total stockholders’ equity	526,561		917,110			351,839			(1,262,944		)	532,566
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	685,087	$	1,060,406		$	2,640,364		$	(1,510,114	)	$	2,875,743

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING BALANCE SHEET AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013

(Expressed in thousands)	Parent		Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
ASSETS
Cash and cash equivalents	$	448	$	30,901		$	66,945		$	—		$	98,294
Cash and securities segregated for regulatory and other purposes	—		—			36,323			—			36,323
Deposits with clearing organizations	—		—			23,679			—			23,679
Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	—		—			364,873			—			364,873
Receivable from customers, net of allowance for credit losses of $2,423	—		—			868,869			—			868,869
Income tax receivable	19,494		27,589			(817		)	(39,704		)	6,562
Securities purchased under agreements to resell	—		—			184,825			—			184,825
Securities owned, including amounts pledged of $586,625, at fair value	—		2,225			853,863			—			856,088
Subordinated loan receivable	—		112,558			—			(112,558		)	—
Notes receivable, net	—		—			40,751			—			40,751
Office facilities, net	—		21,250			11,689			—			32,939
Deferred tax assets, net	678		309			29,496			(30,483		)	—
Intangible assets	—		—			31,700			—			31,700
Goodwill	—		—			137,889			—			137,889
Loans held for sale	—		—			75,989			—			75,989
Mortgage servicing rights	—		—			28,879			—			28,879
Other assets	2,797		27,113			135,150			—			165,060
Investment in subsidiaries	546,755		910,230			(182,625		)	(1,274,360		)	—
Intercompany receivables	153,528		(68,920		)	(20,107		)	(64,501		)	—
Total assets	$	723,700	$	1,063,255		$	2,687,371		$	(1,521,606	)	$	2,952,720
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Liabilities
Drafts payable	$	—	$	—		$	48,198		$	—		$	48,198
Bank call loans	—		—			118,200			—			118,200
Payable to brokers, dealers and clearing organizations	—		—			223,315			—			223,315
Payable to customers	—		—			626,564			—			626,564
Securities sold under agreements to repurchase	—		—			757,491			—			757,491
Securities sold, but not yet purchased, at fair value	—		—			76,314			—			76,314
Accrued compensation	—		—			180,119			—			180,119
Accounts payable and other liabilities	3,742		59,289			129,609			(88		)	192,552
Income tax payable	2,440		22,189			15,075			(39,704		)	—
Senior secured notes	195,000		—			—			—			195,000
Subordinated indebtedness	—		—			112,558			(112,558		)	—
Deferred tax liabilities, net	—		—			37,579			(30,483		)	7,096
Intercompany payables	—		64,501			—			(64,501		)	—
Total liabilities	201,182		145,979			2,325,022			(247,334		)	2,424,849
Stockholders’ equity
Stockholders’ equity attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	522,518		917,276			356,996			(1,274,272		)	522,518
Non-controlling interest	—		—			5,353			—			5,353
Total stockholders’ equity	522,518		917,276			362,349			(1,274,272		)	527,871
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity	$	723,700	$	1,063,255		$	2,687,371		$	(1,521,606	)	$	2,952,720

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

(Expressed in thousands)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
REVENUES
Commissions	$	—		$	—		$	110,862		$	—		$	110,862
Advisory fees	—			—			71,278			(321		)	70,957
Investment banking	—			—			33,841			—			33,841
Interest	—			2,580			12,434			(2,565		)	12,449
Principal transactions, net	—			(161		)	4,433			—			4,272
Other	—			85			12,279			(66		)	12,298
Total revenue	—			2,504			245,127			(2,952		)	244,679
EXPENSES
Compensation and related expenses	207			—			161,127			—			161,334
Communications and technology	37			—			15,954			—			15,991
Occupancy and equipment costs	—			—			15,867			(66		)	15,801
Clearing and exchange fees	—			—			5,969			—			5,969
Interest	3,281			8			3,403			(2,565		)	4,127
Other	235			17			30,630			(321		)	30,561
Total expenses	3,760			25			232,950			(2,952		)	233,783
Income (loss) before income taxes	(3,760		)	2,479			12,177			—			10,896
Income tax provision (benefit)	(1,816		)	1,326			6,761			—			6,271
Net income (loss) for the period	(1,944		)	1,153			5,416			—			4,625
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax	—			—			155			—			155
Equity in subsidiaries	6,415			—			—			(6,415		)	—
Net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	4,471			1,153			5,261			(6,415		)	4,470
Other comprehensive income	—			—			(1,608		)	—			(1,608		)
Total comprehensive income	$	4,471		$	1,153		$	3,653		$	(6,415	)	$	2,862

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

(Expressed in thousands)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries		Non-guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations			Consolidated
REVENUES
Commissions	$	—		$	—	$	349,062		$	—		$	349,062
Advisory fees	—			—		210,594			(1,002		)	209,592
Investment banking	—			—		94,164			—			94,164
Interest	—			7,901		37,347			(7,861		)	37,387
Principal transactions, net	—			10		24,873			—			24,883
Other	—			375		34,419			(346		)	34,448
Total revenue	—			8,286		750,459			(9,209		)	749,536
EXPENSES
Compensation and related expenses	822			—		492,313			—			493,135
Communications and technology	111			—		50,150			—			50,261
Occupancy and equipment costs	—			—		47,451			(346		)	47,105
Clearing and exchange fees	—			—		17,885			—			17,885
Interest	11,120			8		10,436			(7,861		)	13,703
Other	4,396			30		107,882			(1,002		)	111,306
Total expenses	16,449			38		726,117			(9,209		)	733,395
Income (loss) before income taxes	(16,449		)	8,248		24,342			—			16,141
Income tax provision (benefit)	(6,450		)	2,457		13,342			—			9,349
Net income (loss) for the period	(9,999		)	5,791		11,000			—			6,792
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax	—			—		652			—			652
Equity in subsidiaries	16,139			—		—			(16,139		)	—
Net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	6,140			5,791		10,348			(16,139		)	6,140
Other comprehensive income	—			—		(1,356		)	—			(1,356		)
Total comprehensive income	$	6,140		$	5,791	$	8,992		$	(16,139	)	$	4,784

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(Expressed in thousands)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries		Non-guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
REVENUES
Commissions	$	—		$	—	$	120,252	$	—		$	120,252
Advisory fees	—			—		60,650		(533		)	60,117
Investment banking	—			—		21,362		—			21,362
Principal transactions, net	—			26		10,321		—			10,347
Interest	—			2,777		14,805		(3,143		)	14,439
Other	—			42		16,859		(42		)	16,859
Total revenue	—			2,845		244,249		(3,718		)	243,376
EXPENSES
Compensation and related expenses	207			—		160,874		—			161,081
Occupancy and equipment costs	—			—		16,447		(42		)	16,405
Communications and technology	23			—		16,976		—			16,999
Interest	4,375			—		4,932		(3,143		)	6,164
Clearing and exchange fees	—			—		6,099		—			6,099
Other	285			4		28,709		(533		)	28,465
Total expenses	4,890			4		234,037		(3,718		)	235,213
Income (loss) before income taxes	(4,890		)	2,841		10,212		—			8,163
Income tax provision (benefit)	(1,792		)	1,808		2,639		—			2,655
Net income (loss) for the period	(3,098		)	1,033		7,573		—			5,508
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax	—			—		271		—			271
Equity in subsidiaries	8,335			—		—		(8,335		)	—
Net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	5,237			1,033		7,302		(8,335		)	5,237
Other comprehensive income	—			—		656		—			656
Total comprehensive income	$	5,237		$	1,033	$	7,958	$	(8,335	)	$	5,893

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(Expressed in thousands)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries		Non-guarantor Subsidiaries		Eliminations			Consolidated
REVENUES
Commissions	$	—		$	—	$	364,272	$	—		$	364,272
Advisory fees	—			—		179,137		(1,720		)	177,417
Investment banking	—			—		62,377		—			62,377
Principal transactions, net	—			38		33,558		—			33,596
Interest	5			8,370		40,119		(8,578		)	39,916
Other	—			126		48,774		(126		)	48,774
Total revenue	5			8,534		728,237		(10,424		)	726,352
EXPENSES
Compensation and related expenses	902			—		479,394		—			480,296
Occupancy and equipment costs	—			—		51,237		(126		)	51,111
Communications and technology	81			—		48,800		—			48,881
Interest	13,125			—		15,622		(8,578		)	20,169
Clearing and exchange fees	—			—		18,434		—			18,434
Other	1,045			23		87,563		(1,720		)	86,911
Total expenses	15,153			23		701,050		(10,424		)	705,802
Income (loss) before income taxes	(15,148		)	8,511		27,187		—			20,550
Income tax provision (benefit)	(5,723		)	3,702		10,104		—			8,083
Net income (loss) for the period	(9,425		)	4,809		17,083		—			12,467
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax	—			—		719		—			719
Equity in subsidiaries	21,173			—		—		(21,173		)	—
Net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	11,748			4,809		16,364		(21,173		)	11,748
Other comprehensive income (loss)	(3		)	—		1,159		—			1,156
Total comprehensive income	$	11,745		$	4,809	$	17,523	$	(21,173	)	$	12,904

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2014

(Expressed in thousands)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
Cash flows from operations:
Net income (loss) for the period	$	(9,999	)	$	5,791		$	11,000		$	—	$	6,792
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of office facilities and leasehold improvements	—			—			5,787			—		5,787
Deferred income taxes	—			—			6,423			—		6,423
Amortization of notes receivable	—			—			12,393			—		12,393
Amortization of debt issuance costs	408			—			—			—		408
Write-off of debt issuance costs	588			—			—			—		588
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights	—			—			2,025			—		2,025
Provision for credit losses	—			—			28			—		28
Share-based compensation expense	291			—			3,391			—		3,682
Payment of taxes due for share-based awards	(2,074		)	—			—			—		(2,074		)
Changes in operating assets and liabilities	59,523			(31,569		)	(50,269		)	—		(22,315		)
Cash provided by (used in) continuing operations	48,737			(25,778		)	(9,222		)	—		13,737
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of office facilities	—			—			(3,366		)	—		(3,366		)
Cash used in investing activities	—			—			(3,366		)	—		(3,366		)
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash dividends paid on Class A non-voting and Class B voting common stock	(4,483		)	—			—			—		(4,483		)
Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock	185			—			—			—		185
Tax benefit from share-based awards	1,275			—			—			—		1,275
Redemption of senior secured notes	(45,000		)	—			—			—		(45,000		)
Other financing activities	—			—			17,300			—		17,300
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities	(48,023		)	—			17,300			—		(30,723		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	714			(25,778		)	4,712			—		(20,352		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period	448			30,901			66,945			—		98,294
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period	$	1,162		$	5,123		$	71,657		$	—	$	77,942

Table of Contents

OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC. CONDENSED CONSOLIDATING STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS FOR THE NINE MONTHS ENDED SEPTEMBER 30, 2013

(Expressed in thousands)	Parent			Guarantor subsidiaries			Non-Guarantor Subsidiaries			Eliminations		Consolidated
Cash flows from operations:
Net income (loss) for the period	$	(9,425	)	$	4,809		$	17,083		$	—	$	12,467
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization of office facilities and leasehold improvements	—			—			7,434			—		7,434
Deferred income taxes	—			—			13,862			—		13,862
Amortization of notes receivable	—			—			14,086			—		14,086
Amortization of debt issuance costs	479			—			—			—		479
Amortization of mortgage servicing rights	—			—			1,120			—		1,120
Provision for (reversal of) credit losses	—			—			178			—		178
Share-based compensation expense	—			—			3,966			—		3,966
Changes in operating assets and liabilities	15,958			(13,026		)	(33,576		)	—		(30,644		)
Cash provided by (used in) continuing operations	7,012			(8,217		)	24,153			—		22,948
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of office facilities	—			—			(12,642		)	—		(12,642		)
Cash used in investing activities	—			—			(12,642		)	—		(12,642		)
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash dividends paid on Class A non-voting and Class B voting common stock	(4,494		)	—			—			—		(4,494		)
Issuance of Class A non-voting common stock	85			—			—			—		85
Repurchase of Class A non-voting common stock	(2,314		)	—			—			—		(2,314		)
Tax deficiency from share-based awards	(92		)	—			—			—		(92		)
Other financing activities	—			—			(33,500		)	—		(33,500		)
Cash flow provided by (used in) financing activities	(6,815		)	—			(33,500		)	—		(40,315		)
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	197			(8,217		)	(21,989		)	—		(30,009		)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of the period	35			40,658			94,673			—		135,366
Cash and cash equivalents, end of the period	$	232		$	32,441		$	72,684		$	—	$	105,357

Table of Contents

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. Reference is also made to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto found in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

The Company engages in a broad range of activities in the securities industry, including retail securities brokerage, institutional sales and trading, investment banking (both corporate and public finance), research, market-making, trust services and investment advisory and asset management services. Its principal subsidiaries are Oppenheimer & Co. Inc. (“Oppenheimer”) and Oppenheimer Asset Management Inc. (“OAM”). As of September 30, 2014, the Company provided its services from 94 offices in 25 states located throughout the United States, offices in Tel Aviv, Israel, Hong Kong and Beijing, China, London, England, St. Helier, Isle of Jersey and Geneva, Switzerland. Client assets administered by the Company as of September 30, 2014 totaled approximately $88.3 billion. The Company provides investment advisory services through OAM and Oppenheimer Investment Management Inc. (“OIM”) and Oppenheimer’s Fahnestock Asset Management, Alpha and OMEGA Group divisions. At September 30, 2014, client assets under management totaled approximately $26.0 billion. The Company provides trust services and products through Oppenheimer Trust Company of Delaware. The Company provides discount brokerage services through Freedom Investments, Inc. (“Freedom”) and through Freedom's BUYandHOLD division. Through OPY Credit Corp., the Company offers syndication as well as trading of issued syndicated corporate loans. Oppenheimer Multifamily Housing & Healthcare Finance, Inc. (“OMHHF”) is engaged in FHA insured commercial mortgage origination and servicing. At September 30, 2014, the Company employed 3,480 employees (3,405 full-time and 75 part-time), of whom approximately 1,353 were financial advisers.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The Company’s accounting policies are essential to understanding and interpreting the financial results reported in the condensed consolidated financial statements. The significant accounting policies used in the preparation of the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements are summarized in Note 2 to the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto found in its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013. Certain of those policies are considered to be particularly important to the presentation of the Company’s financial results because they require management to make difficult, complex or subjective judgments, often as a result of matters that are inherently uncertain.

During the three months ended September 30, 2014, there were no material changes to matters discussed under the heading “Critical Accounting Estimates” in Part II, Item 7 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Business Environment

The securities industry is directly affected by general economic and market conditions, including fluctuations in volume and price levels of securities and changes in interest rates, inflation, political events, investor confidence, investor participation levels, legal and regulatory, accounting, tax and compliance requirements and competition, all of which have an impact on commissions, firm trading, fees from accounts under investment management as well as fees for investment banking services, investment and interest income as well as on liquidity. Substantial fluctuations can occur in revenue and net income due to these and other factors.

For a number of years, the Company has offered auction rate securities (“ARS”) to its clients. A significant portion of the market in ARS ‘failed’ because, in the tight credit market in and subsequent to 2008, dealers were no longer willing or able to purchase the imbalance between supply and demand for ARS. These securities have auctions scheduled on either a 7, 28 or 35 day cycle. Clients of the Company own ARS in their individual accounts. The absence of a liquid market for these securities presents a significant problem to clients continuing to own ARS and, as a result, to the Company. It should be noted that this is a failure of liquidity and not a default. These securities in almost all cases have not failed to pay interest or principal when due. These securities are fully collateralized for the most part and, for the most part, remain good credits. The Company did not act as an auction agent for ARS.

Interest rates on ARS typically reset through periodic auctions. Due to the auction mechanism and generally liquid markets, ARS historically were categorized as Level 1 in the fair value hierarchy. Beginning in February 2008, uncertainties in the credit markets resulted in substantially all of the ARS market experiencing failed auctions. Once the auctions failed, the ARS could no longer be valued using observable prices set in the auctions. The Company has used less observable determinants of the fair value of ARS, including the strength in the underlying credits, announced issuer redemptions, completed issuer redemptions, and announcements from issuers regarding their intentions with respect to their outstanding ARS. The Company has also

Table of Contents

developed an internal methodology to discount for the lack of liquidity and non-performance risk of the failed auctions. Due to liquidity problems associated with the ARS market, ARS that lack liquidity are setting their interest rates according to a maximum rate formula defined in their registration statements.

The Company has sought financing from a number of sources, without success, in order to try to find a means for all its clients to find liquidity from their ARS holdings. It seems likely that liquidity will ultimately come from issuer redemptions which, to date, combined with purchases by the Company have reduced client holdings by 92%. There can be no assurance that the Company will be successful in finding a liquidity solution for all its clients’ ARS. See “Risk Factors – The Company may continue to be adversely affected by the failure of the Auction Rate Securities Market” appearing in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and “Factors Affecting ‘Forward-Looking Statements’” herein.

Recent events have caused increased review and scrutiny of the methods utilized by financial service companies to finance their short term requirements for liquidity. The Company utilizes commercial bank loans, securities lending, and repurchase agreements to finance its short term liquidity needs (See “Liquidity”). All repurchase agreements and reverse repurchase agreements are collateralized by short term U.S. Government obligations and U.S. Government Agency obligations.

The Company is focused on growing its private client and asset management businesses through strategic additions of experienced financial advisers in its existing branch system and employment of experienced money management personnel in its asset management business. In addition, the Company is committed to the improvement of its technology capability to support client service and the expansion of its capital markets capabilities while addressing the issue of managing its expenses.

Regulatory and Legal Environment

The brokerage business is subject to regulation by, among others, the SEC, the Commodity Futures Trading Commission ("CFTC") and FINRA in the United States, the Financial Conduct Authority (“FCA”) in the United Kingdom, the Jersey Financial Services Commission (“JFSC”) in the Isle of Jersey, the Securities and Futures Commission in Hong Kong (“SFC”), and various state securities regulators in the United States. In addition, Oppenheimer Israel (OPCO) Ltd. operates under the supervision of the Israeli Securities Authority. Events of a decade ago surrounding corporate accounting and other activities leading to investor losses resulted in the enactment of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and have caused increased regulation of public companies. The financial crisis of 2008-9 accelerated this trend. New regulations and new interpretations and enforcement of existing regulations have created increased costs of compliance and increased investment in systems and procedures to comply with these more complex and onerous requirements. The SEC has increased their enforcement activities with an intent to bring more actions against firms and individuals for violations of existing rules as well as for conduct that stems from violations of new interpretations of existing rules and to assert significant penalties in connection with such activities. Various states are imposing their own regulations that make compliance more difficult and more expensive to monitor.

In July 2010, Congress enacted extensive legislation entitled the Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (“Dodd Frank”) in which it mandated that the SEC and other regulators conduct comprehensive studies and issue new regulations based on their findings to control the activities of financial institutions in order to protect the financial system, the investing public and consumers from issues and failures that occurred in the 2008-9 financial crisis. All relevant studies have not yet been completed, but they are widely expected to extensively impact the regulation and practices of financial institutions including the Company. The changes are likely to significantly reduce leverage available to financial institutions and to increase transparency to regulators and investors of risks taken by such institutions. It continues to be impossible to predict the nature and impact of such rulemaking. In addition, new rules have been adapted to regulate and/or prohibit proprietary trading for certain deposit taking institutions, control the amount and timing of compensation to “highly paid” employees, create new regulations around financial transactions with consumers requiring the adoption of a uniform fiduciary standard of care of broker-dealers and investment advisers providing personalized investment advice about securities to retail customers, increase the disclosures provided to clients, and create a tax on securities transactions. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has stated its intention to implement new rules affecting the interaction between financial institutions and consumers. In addition, the U.S. Department of Labor is poised to propose its own rules for financial institutions surrounding their fiduciary duty to retirement plans which could have significant negative implications for the industry’s relationships with this broad group of clients including individuals holding Individual Retirement Accounts (“IRA”). In December 2012, France began applying a 0.2% transaction tax on financial transactions in American Depository Receipts of French companies that trade on U.S. exchanges. Italy implemented its own financial transaction tax in March 2013. The imposition of financial transaction taxes are likely to impact the jurisdictions in which securities are traded and the “spreads” demanded by market participants in order to make up for the cost of any such tax. Such a tax may be implemented throughout the European Union. Recent publicity around “high speed trading” has created suggestions by legislators to create a financial transaction tax in the U.S. to inhibit such trading. FINRA has proposed a data collection system (CARDS- Comprehensive Automated Risk Data System) that would

Table of Contents

collect data on virtually every transaction involving clients and process and retain the information. It is possible that client reaction to this information collection will drive client activity to non-broker dealers, and have a detrimental impact on the business of the Company. If and when enacted, such regulations will likely increase compliance costs and reduce returns earned by financial service providers and intensify compliance overall. It is difficult to predict the nature of the final regulations and their impact on the business of the Company.

Prohibitions and Restrictions on Proprietary Trading and Certain Interests in, and Relationships with, Hedge Funds and Private Equity Funds (the “Volcker Rule”) was published by the U.S. Federal Reserve Board as required by Dodd-Frank in 2011. The Volcker Rule is intended to restrict U.S. banks and other financial institutions that accept deposits from conducting proprietary trading activities, as well as investing in hedge funds and private equity funds for their own account. The intent of the Volcker Rule is to reduce risk to the capital of such institutions through reducing speculation and risk-taking with bank capital. The draft form of the proposed rule was exposed for comment until February 13, 2012 and is scheduled to become effective on July 21, 2015 (subject to possible additional delays). There may be additional changes to the requirements of the Volcker Rule and it is impossible to determine the Volcker Rule’s impact on market liquidity and on the liquidity of issued sovereign debt in Europe and Asia. The Company believes that the Volcker Rule will not directly affect its operations, but indirect effects cannot be predicted with any certainty. Additionally, the Federal Reserve in conjunction with other U.S. regulatory organizations has analyzed the U.S. financial system and the impact that might result from the failure of one or more “Strategically Important Financial Institutions” (“SIFI”). To date, less than 50 such institutions have been identified and will be made subject to special regulations including the requirement to create a plan for their orderly demise in the event of a failure. Oppenheimer has not been identified as a SIFI. There can be no assurance that this list will not grow to include more SIFI institutions. The identification process has not been completed and is subject to appeal by the affected institutions. The Company has no reason to believe that it will be identified as a SIFI. But, this requirement may have broader implications for the capital markets as capital becomes less available.

Recent revelations concerning the potential manipulation of LIBOR (“London Interbank Offered Rate”) during the period from 2008-2010 make it likely that more regulation surrounding the fixing of interest rates on commercial bank loans and reference rates on derivatives can be expected. Similar investigations are underway with respect to the setting of foreign exchange rates over a broad time period and there is no way to predict the outcome of these investigations although recently enforcement has been instituted against a number of international banks as well as employees of such banks.

The rules and requirements that were created by the passage of the Patriot Act, and the anti-money laundering regulations (AML) in the U.S. and similar laws in other countries that are related, have created significant costs of compliance and can be expected to continue to do so. FinCEN ("Financial Crimes Enforcement Network") has heightened their review of activities of broker-dealers where heretofore their focus had been on commercial banks. This increased focus is likely to lead to significantly higher levels of enforcement and higher fines and penalties on broker dealers. Regulators have expanded their views of the requirements of the Patriot Act, as well as through enforcement of the provisions of the Bank Secrecy Act (“BSA”) and the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (“FCPA”) with respect to the amount of diligence required by financial institutions of both their foreign and domestic clients and their activities.

Pursuant to FINRA Rule 3130 (formerly NASD Rule 3013 and NYSE Rule 342), the chief executive officers (“CEOs”) of regulated broker-dealers (including the CEO of Oppenheimer) are required to certify that their companies have processes in place to establish and test supervisory policies and procedures reasonably designed to achieve compliance with federal securities laws and regulations, including applicable regulations of self-regulatory organizations. The CEO of the Company is required to make such a certification on an annual basis and did so in March 2014.

On July 30, 2013, the SEC adopted final amendments to the financial responsibility rules (“FRRs”) and reporting rules under SEC Rule 17a-5 (“Reporting Rule”) for broker-dealers. The final amendments to the FRRs make changes to the rules related to proprietary accounts for broker-dealers, special reserve deposits with banks, bank sweep programs, deductions from net worth, solvency requirements, the SEC’s ability to restrict withdrawals of capital, books and records requirements, and notifications to regulators. The effective date for the FRRs was October 21, 2013. The effectiveness of certain provisions of the final amendments was extended to March 3, 2014.

The Reporting Rule requires all broker-dealers to file a new unaudited quarterly Form Custody report which provides information around custodial practices and was effective December 31, 2013. In addition, the new Reporting Rule provides significant changes to annual reporting of broker-dealers by eliminating the internal control report referred to as the Material Inadequacy letter, providing for a new Compliance Report asserting the effectiveness of internal controls for compliance with net capital, customer reserve formula, quarterly security count, and customer account statements. Also, the new Reporting Rule makes changes to the audit and attestation requirements for auditor reporting from American Institute of Certified Public

Table of Contents

Accountants (“AICPA”) standards to Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (“PCAOB”) standards as well as provide the SEC with access to auditors and audit workpapers. These rules are effective for fiscal years ending on or after June 1, 2014.

On May 14, 2013, the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) released an updated version of its Internal Control – Integrated Framework (the "2013 Framework"), which supersedes the original framework that was developed in 1992 (the "1992 Framework"). Most public companies, including the Company, adopted the 1992 Framework as a basis for their compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 and the primary objective in updating and enhancing the 1992 Framework was to address the significant changes to the business and operating environments. The 2013 Framework is effective on December 15, 2014. The Company has begun its readiness assessments to ensure its compliance with the 2013 Framework.

Other Regulatory Matters

For several quarters, Oppenheimer has been responding to information requests from the Enforcement Staff of FINRA regarding Oppenheimer’s policies and procedures in relation to, and the activities of several financial advisers concerning, the sale of low-priced securities. On August 5, 2013, FINRA issued an order accepting an offer of settlement submitted by Oppenheimer without admitting or denying the recitation of facts and violative conduct set forth in the order (the “Order”). The Order states that from August 2008 through September 2010 seven brokers in five branch offices of Oppenheimer permitted the sale of low priced securities (“penny stocks”) that were neither registered or exempt from registration under the Securities Act and Oppenheimer’s supervisory system failed to prevent such violations. In addition, FINRA determined Oppenheimer failed to follow up on specific red flags relating to the sale of penny stocks and Oppenheimer’s AML program failed to detect suspicious activity related to penny stock sales. FINRA determined this activity violated FINRA Rules 2010, 2110 and 3310. As a result, Oppenheimer was censured and paid a total fine of $1,425,000. Oppenheimer also agreed to retain an independent consultant to conduct a review of its policies, systems, procedures and training relating to the receipt or purchase and subsequent sale of penny stocks, the supervision of Foreign Financial Institutions (“FFIs”) and its anti-money laundering procedures related to FFIs and the handling of movement of securities. The independent consultant completed its review and filed its report with Oppenheimer and FINRA in January 2014. Oppenheimer agreed to adopt all of the recommendations of the independent consultant.

On June 23, 2011, Oppenheimer received notice of an investigation by the SEC pursuant to which the SEC requested information from the Company regarding the sale of a number of low-priced securities effected primarily through several former Oppenheimer financial advisers and purchases and sales of low-priced securities through one Oppenheimer customer account. The issues and facts surrounding this investigation are, in the Company’s view, largely duplicative of the matter that was settled by Oppenheimer with FINRA in August 2013 described above. On July 16, 2013, the Company received a “Wells Notice” from the SEC requesting that Oppenheimer make a written submission to the SEC to explain why Oppenheimer should not be charged with violations of the Exchange Act in relation to its sales of low-priced securities on behalf of a former customer of the firm. The Company submitted a Wells response on August 19, 2013.

The Company believes that the SEC may file one or more enforcement actions against Oppenheimer as well as the members of management in connection with the two immediately preceding paragraphs.

In February 2014, Oppenheimer received notice of an investigation by, and a request for information from, a division of the United States Department of the Treasury (“FinCEN”) relating to potential violations of the Bank Secrecy Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder related primarily to, in the Company’s view, the FINRA and SEC matters discussed immediately above. Oppenheimer provided information it believes is responsive to the FinCEN request for information in March of 2014. The Company believes that FinCEN may file an action or issue an assessment against the Company related to their investigation.

Table of Contents

For several quarters, Oppenheimer has been responding to information requests from FINRA regarding the sale of leveraged and inverse exchange traded funds (“ETFs”). Several Oppenheimer employees have provided on-the-record testimony in connection with the investigation.

In May 2014, Oppenheimer received a “Wells Notice” from FINRA requesting that Oppenheimer make a written submission to explain why Oppenheimer should not be charged with violations of FINRA rules relating to the supervision of one former financial advisor and associated charges related to alleged deficient supervisory systems, late FINRA U/4/U/5 filings and record retention. Oppenheimer has not yet determined whether or not to file a Wells response but will make such determination in the fourth quarter of 2014.

Oppenheimer is continuing to cooperate with the investigating entities.

Since early 2014, Oppenheimer has been responding to information requests from FINRA regarding the supervision of one of its former financial advisors who was indicted by the United States Attorney's Office for the District of New Jersey in March 2014 on allegations of insider trading. In August 2014, Oppenheimer received information requests from the SEC regarding supervision of the same financial advisor. Oppenheimer is continuing to cooperate with both the FINRA and SEC inquiries.

In February 2010, Oppenheimer finalized settlements with the Regulators concluding investigations and administrative proceedings by the Regulators concerning Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of ARS. Pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators, Oppenheimer agreed to extend offers to repurchase ARS from certain of its clients subject to certain terms and conditions. In addition to the settlements with the Regulators, Oppenheimer has also reached settlements of and received adverse awards in legal proceedings with various clients where the Company is obligated to purchase ARS. Pursuant to completed Purchase Offers (as defined) under the settlements with the Regulators and client related legal settlements and awards to purchase ARS, as of September 30, 2014, the Company purchased and holds (net of redemptions) approximately $94.8 million in ARS from its clients. As of September 30, 2014, the Company did not have any outstanding ARS purchase commitments related to the settlements with the Regulators. In addition, the Company is committed to purchase another $13.1 million from clients through 2016 under legal settlements and awards.

The Company’s clients held at Oppenheimer approximately $140.1 million of ARS at September 30, 2014 exclusive of amounts that 1) were owned by Qualified Institutional Buyers (“QIBs”), 2) were transferred to the Company after February 2008, 3) were purchased by clients after February 2008, or 4) were transferred from the Company to other securities firms after February 2008. See “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” herein for additional details.

Other Matters

The Company operates in all state jurisdictions in the United States and is thus subject to regulation and enforcement under the laws and regulations of each of these jurisdictions. The Company has been and expects that it will continue to be subject to investigations and some or all of these may result in enforcement proceedings as a result of its business conducted in the various states.

As part of its ongoing business, the Company records reserves for legal expenses, judgments, fines and/or awards attributable to litigation and regulatory matters. In connection therewith, the Company has maintained its legal reserves at levels it believes will resolve outstanding matters, but may increase or decrease such reserves as matters warrant. In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company establishes reserves for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. When loss contingencies are not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company does not establish reserves. See “Legal Proceedings” herein.

Table of Contents

Business Continuity

The Company is committed to an on-going investment in its technology and communications infrastructure including extensive business continuity planning and investment. These costs are on-going and the Company believes that current and future costs will exceed historic levels due to business and regulatory requirements. The Company built a new data center in 2010 which is housed in a location different than its headquarters. The move to new headquarters in 2012 required additional outlays for business continuity purposes although considerable savings have begun to be realized by the availability of independent electric generating capacity for the entire building which will support the Company’s infrastructure and occupancy.

The fourth quarter of 2012 was impacted by Superstorm Sandy which occurred on October 29, 2012 causing the Company to vacate its then two principal offices in downtown Manhattan and displaced 800 of the Company’s employees including substantially all of its capital markets, operations and headquarters staff for in excess of 30 days. The Company continues to review both internally and with its landlords and vendors the infrastructure necessary to withstand a similar event in light of the issues that arose in the fall of 2012.

Cybersecurity

The Company has been focused for many years on the issues of maintaining the security of its clients’ data, access to its data processing environment, and its data processing facilities. Recent examples of vulnerabilities by other companies which have resulted in loss of client data and fraudulent activities by both domestic and foreign entities have caused the Company to review its security policies and procedures and to take additional actions to protect its network and its information. Such threats are ongoing and the Company believes that increased resources will need to be dedicated to this effort in the future.

Outlook

The Company’s long-term plan is to continue to expand existing offices by hiring experienced professionals as well as expand through the purchase of operating branch offices from other broker dealers or the opening of new branch offices in attractive locations, thus maximizing the potential of each office and the development of existing trading, investment banking, investment advisory and other activities. Equally important is the search for viable acquisition candidates. As opportunities are presented, it is the long-term intention of the Company to pursue growth by acquisition where a comfortable match can be found in terms of corporate goals and personnel at a price that would provide the Company’s stockholders with incremental value. The Company may review potential acquisition opportunities, and will continue to focus its attention on the management of its existing business and may, from time to time, dispose of business activities that are no longer strategic to its business operations or which have limited opportunities for growth. In addition, the Company is committed to improving its technology capabilities to support client service and the expansion of its capital markets capabilities.

Results of Operations

The Company reported net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. of $4.5 million or $0.33 per share for the third quarter of 2014 compared with net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc. of $5.2 million or $0.38 per share for the third quarter of 2013, a decrease of 14.6%. Income before taxes was $10.9 million for the third quarter of 2014 compared with income before taxes of $8.2 million for the third quarter of 2013, an increase of 33.5%. Revenue for the third quarter of 2014 was $244.7 million compared with $243.4 million in the third quarter of 2013, an increase of 0.5%.

Table of Contents

The following table and discussion summarizes the changes in the major revenue and expense categories for the three months ended September 30, 2014 compared to the same period in 2013:



(Expressed in thousands)	Three Months Ended September 30, 2014					Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014
	Amount Change			% Change		Amount Change			% Change
Revenue
Commissions	$	(9,390	)	(7.8	)	$	(15,210	)	(4.2	)
Advisory fees	10,840			18.0		32,175			18.1
Investment banking	12,479			58.4		31,787			51.0
Interest	(1,990		)	(13.8	)	(2,529		)	(6.3	)
Principal transactions, net	(6,075		)	(58.7	)	(8,713		)	(25.9	)
Other	(4,561		)	(27.1	)	(14,326		)	(29.4	)
Total revenue	1,303			0.5		23,184			3.2
Expenses
Compensation and related expenses	253			0.2		12,839			2.7
Communications and technology	(1,008		)	(5.9	)	1,380			2.8
Occupancy and equipment costs	(604		)	(3.7	)	(4,006		)	(7.8	)
Clearing and exchange fees	(130		)	(2.1	)	(549		)	(3.0	)
Interest	(2,037		)	(33.0	)	(6,466		)	(32.1	)
Other	2,096			7.4		24,395			28.1
Total expenses	(1,430		)	(0.6	)	27,593			3.9
Income before income taxes	2,733			33.5		(4,409		)	(21.5	)
Income tax provision	3,616			136.2		1,266			15.7
Net income for the period	(883		)	(16.0	)	(5,675		)	(45.5	)
Less net income attributable to non-controlling interest, net of tax	(116		)	(42.8	)	(67		)	(9.3	)
Net income attributable to Oppenheimer Holdings Inc.	$	(767	)	(14.6	)	$	(5,608	)	(47.7	)

Table of Contents

Third Quarter 2014

Revenue

Commission revenue was $110.9 million for the third quarter of 2014, a decrease of 7.8% compared with $120.3 million for the third quarter of 2013 due to the low transaction volumes from retail investors during the current year quarter.

Advisory fees were $71.0 million for the third quarter of 2014, an increase of 18.0% compared with $60.1 million for the third quarter of 2013 due to increased levels of managed product assets. Assets under management increased 17.8% from $22.5 billion to $26.5 billion from June 30, 2013 to June 30, 2014, which contributed to the aforementioned advisory fee increase as the fees are calculated quarterly based on the market value at the end of the previous period. Assets under management for the period ended September 30, 2014 decreased 1.9% to $26.0 billion as compared to $26.5 billion at June 30, 2014. The decrease was due to market depreciation of 1.4% on current assets under management as well as a 0.6% decrease in new assets.

Investment banking revenue increased 58.4% to $33.8 million for the third quarter of 2014 compared with $21.4 million for the third quarter of 2013 primarily due to increased fees from mergers and acquisitions activity during the current period.

Interest revenue was $12.4 million for third quarter of 2014, a decrease of 13.8% compared with $14.4 million for the third quarter of 2013. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease of $2.1 million in interest from lower holdings of reverse repurchase agreements and U.S. government and agency securities.

Principal transactions revenue decreased 58.7% to $4.3 million during the third quarter of 2014 compared with the third quarter of 2013 due to lower trading profits in equities, corporate bonds, and government and agency securities during the current period.

Other revenue was $12.3 million for the third quarter of 2014, a decrease of 27.1% compared to $16.9 million for the third quarter of 2013 due to the decrease in the value of assets underlying the deferred compensation plan and the lower fees earned from loan originations (13 loans originated in the third quarter of 2014 compared to 18 loans originated in the prior year quarter).

Expenses

Compensation and benefits (including salaries, production and incentive compensation, share-based compensation, deferred compensation, and other benefit-related items) totaled $161.3 million during the third quarter of 2014, roughly flat when compared to the third quarter of 2013. Increases in incentive compensation were offset by decreases in production-related and deferred compensation obligations during the third quarter of 2014. Compensation and related expenses as a percentage of revenue was 65.9% during the third quarter of 2014 compared to 66.2% during the third quarter of 2013.

Non-compensation expenses were $72.4 million during the third quarter of 2014, a decrease of 2.3% compared to $74.1 million during the same period last year primarily due to lower debt service costs on the outstanding Senior Secured Notes during the current period.

Year-to-date 2014

Revenue

Commission revenue was $349.1 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, a decrease of 4.2% compared with$364.3 million for the same period of 2013.

Advisory fees were $209.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of 18.1% compared with $177.4 million for the same period of 2013. Assets under management increased 21.2% from $20.9 billion to $25.3 billion from December 31, 2012 to December 31, 2013, 14.3% from $22.4 billion to $25.6 billion from March 31, 2013 to March 31, 2014, and 17.8% from $22.5 billion to $26.5 billion from June 30, 2013 to June 30, 2014, which contributed to the aforementioned advisory fee increase as the fees are calculated quarterly based on the market value at the end of the previous period. Assets under management for the period ended September 30, 2014 increased 9.2% to $26.0 billion as compared to $23.8 billion at September 30, 2013 which will be used to determine the advisory fees for the period ended December 31, 2014.

Investment banking revenue increased 51.0% to $94.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared with $62.4 million for the same period of 2013. The increase was due to increased fees from mergers and acquisition activity and from equity underwritings.

Table of Contents

Interest revenue was $37.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, a decrease of 6.3% compared with $39.9 million for the same period in 2013. The decrease is primarily attributable to a decrease in interest from lower holdings of reverse repurchase agreements and U.S. government and agency securities.

Principal transactions revenue was $24.9 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, a decrease of 25.9% compared with $33.6 million for the same period in 2013. The overall decrease was due to lower trading profits in equities, corporate bonds, and government and agency securities during the third quarter of 2014.

Other revenue was $34.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, a decrease of 29.4% compared with $48.8 million for the same period in 2013 due to the decrease in the value of assets underlying the deferred compensation plan and the lower fees earned from loan originations (27 loans originated in the nine months of 2014 compared to 56 loans originated in the same period in 2013).

Expenses

Compensation and benefits (including salaries, production and incentive compensation, share-based compensation, deferred compensation, and other benefit-related items) totaled $493.1 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of 2.7% compared to $480.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2013. Compensation and related expenses as a percentage of revenue was 65.7% during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 compared to 66.1% during the nine months ended September 30, 2013.

Non-compensation expenses were $240.3 million during the nine months ended September 30, 2014, an increase of 6.5% compared to $225.5 million for the same period in 2013 which is primarily due to the increase in reserves of $19.7 million during the first half of 2014 related to two regulatory matters. The increase was also attributable to the costs associated with the early retirement of the Company’s Senior Secured Notes in April 2014 (call premium and write-off of debt issuance costs) totaling $3.5 million.

The table below presents information about the reported revenue and net income before taxes of the Company’s reportable business segments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013:



(Expressed in thousands)
	For the Three Months Ended September 30,								For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013			% Change		2014			2013			% Change
Revenue
Private Client	$	142,606		$	144,316		(1.2	)	$	435,770		$	430,963		1.1
Asset Management	24,801			21,488			15.4		74,443			64,450			15.5
Capital Markets	71,226			68,460			4.0		221,324			201,495			9.8
Commercial Mortgage Banking	6,349			9,314			(31.8	)	18,179			26,857			(32.3	)
Corporate/Other	(303		)	(202		)	50.0		(180		)	2,587			*
	$	244,679		$	243,376		0.5		$	749,536		$	726,352		3.2
Income (Loss) before income taxes
Private Client	$	18,898		$	15,088		25.3		$	36,766		$	48,113		(23.6	)
Asset Management	8,264			6,387			29.4		24,300			20,332			19.5
Capital Markets	5,699			4,301			32.5		23,965			8,806			172.1
Commercial Mortgage Banking	1,815			2,823			(35.7	)	7,269			7,977			(8.9	)
Corporate/Other	(23,780		)	(20,436		)	16.4		(76,159		)	(64,678		)	17.8
	$	10,896		$	8,163		33.5		$	16,141		$	20,550		(21.5	)


*	Not comparable

Table of Contents

Private Client

Private Client reported revenue of $142.6 million for the third quarter of 2014, 1.2% lower than the third quarter of 2013, primarily due to a decrease in transaction-based business during the current year period. Income before income taxes was $18.9 million, an increase of 25.3% compared with the third quarter of 2013, affected by a decrease in deferred compensation expense during the current period.


•	Client assets under administration were $88.3 billion at September 30, 2014 compared to $81.8 billion at September 30, 2013, an increase of 7.9%.


•	Financial Adviser headcount was 1,353 at the end of the third quarter of 2014, down from 1,400 at the end of the third quarter of 2013 reflecting the Company’s increased focus on financial adviser productivity.


•	Retail commissions were $73.1 million for the third quarter of 2014, a decrease of 8.8% from the prior year quarter.


•	Advisory fee revenue on traditional and alternative managed products was $47.8 million for the third quarter of 2014, an increase of 19.5% over the prior year quarter (see Asset Management below for further information).


•	Money market fees continue to be negatively impacted by waivers in the amount of $7.8 million during the third quarter of 2014 versus waivers of $7.9 million during the third quarter of 2013.

Asset Management

Asset Management reported revenue of $24.8 million for the third quarter of 2014, 15.4% higher than the third quarter of 2013.

Income before income taxes was $8.3 million, an increase of 29.4% compared with the third quarter of 2013, as a result of increased fees earned on managed products.

•

Advisory fee revenue on traditional and alternative managed products was $23.2 million for the third quarter of 2014, an increase of 15.2% over the prior year quarter. Advisory fees are calculated based on the value of client assets under management (“AUM”) at the end of the prior quarter which totaled $26.5 billion at June 30, 2014 ($22.5 billion at June 30, 2013) and are allocated to the Private Client and Asset Management business segments.


•	AUM increased 9.2% to $26.0 billion at September 30, 2014, compared to $23.8 billion at September 30, 2013, which is the basis for advisory fee billings for the fourth quarter of 2014. The increase in AUM was comprised of asset appreciation of $1.6 billion and net new assets of $0.6 billion.

The following table provides a breakdown of the change in assets under management for the three months ended September 30, 2014:



(Expressed in millions)
	For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2014
	Beginning Balance		Contributions		Redemptions			Appreciation (Depreciation)			Ending Balance
Fund Type
Traditional ⁽¹⁾	$	22,336	$	440	$	(487	)	$	(377	)	$	21,912
Institutional Fixed Income ⁽²⁾	1,266		3		(14		)	3			1,258
Alternative Investments:
Hedge Funds ⁽³⁾	2,475		62		(174		)	60			2,423
Private Equity Funds ⁽⁴⁾	428		—		—			(66		)	362
	$	26,505	$	505	$	(675	)	$	(380	)	$	25,955


(1)	Traditional investments include third party advisory programs, Oppenheimer financial adviser managed and advisory programs, and Oppenheimer Asset Management taxable and tax-exempt portfolio management strategies.


(2)	Institutional fixed income provides solutions to institutional investors including: Taft-Hartley Funds, Public Pension Funds, Corporate Pension Funds, and Foundations and Endowments.


(3)	Hedge funds represent single manager hedge fund strategies in areas including hedged equity, technology and financial services, and multi-manager and multi-strategy fund of funds.


(4)	Private equity funds represent private equity fund of funds including portfolios focused on natural resources and related assets.

Table of Contents

Capital Markets

Capital Markets reported revenue of $71.2 million for the third quarter of 2014, 4.0% higher than the third quarter of 2013 primarily due to increased fees from mergers and acquisitions activity. Income before income taxes was $5.7 million for the third quarter of 2014, an increase of 32.5% compared with income before income taxes of $4.3 million for the third quarter of 2013.


•	Institutional equities commissions were $26.7 million for the third quarter of 2014, a decrease of 0.6% compared with the prior year period.


•	Advisory fees from investment banking activities more than tripled to $14.0 million in the third quarter of 2014 compared with the prior year period due to an increase in corporate finance advisory services during the current period.


•	Equity underwriting fees increased 2.6% to $13.9 million for the third quarter of 2014 compared with the prior year period.


•	Revenue from Taxable Fixed Income decreased 33.0% to $13.2 million for the third quarter of 2014 compared with the prior year period due to lower investor activity during the current period.


•	Public Finance and Municipal Trading revenue increased 8.9% to $5.7 million for the third quarter of 2014 compared with the prior year period.

Commercial Mortgage Banking

Commercial Mortgage Banking reported revenue of $6.3 million for the third quarter of 2014, 31.8% lower than the third quarter of 2013, due to a decrease in the dollar volume of loans originated during the 2014 period. Income before income taxes was $1.8 million, a decrease of 35.7% compared with the third quarter of 2013, due to the lower number of loans originated during the current year period.


•	Loan origination fees for the third quarter of 2014 were $2.0 million, a decrease of 26.0% compared with the prior year period, as the Company originated 13 commercial loans (18 in the third quarter of 2013) with an aggregate principal loan balance of $91.1 million ($193.0 million in the third quarter of 2013).


•	Net servicing revenue for the third quarter of 2014 was $1.4 million compared with $1.3 million for the comparable period in 2013.


•	Principal loan balances related to servicing activities totaled $4.0 billion at September 30, 2014, up 2.6% from September 30, 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

Total assets at September 30, 2014 decreased by 2.6% from December 31, 2013. The Company satisfies its need for short-term funds from internally generated funds and collateralized and uncollateralized borrowings, consisting primarily of bank loans, stock loans, uncommitted lines of credit, and warehouse facilities. The Company finances its trading in government securities through the use of repurchase agreements. The Company’s longer-term capital needs are met through the issuance of the Notes (see “Refinancing” below). The amount of Oppenheimer’s bank borrowings fluctuates in response to changes in the level of the Company’s securities inventories and customer margin debt, changes in notes receivable from employees, investment in office facilities, and changes in stock loan balances and financing through repurchase agreements. Oppenheimer has arrangements with banks for borrowings on a fully-collateralized basis. At September 30, 2014, the Company had $135.5 million of such borrowings outstanding compared to outstanding borrowings of $118.2 million at December 31, 2013. The Company also has some availability of short-term bank financing on an unsecured basis.

Volatility in the financial markets and ongoing concerns about the speed and degree of economic recovery has had an adverse effect on the availability of credit through traditional sources. As a result of concerns around financial markets generally and the strength of counterparties specifically, lenders have reduced and, in some cases, ceased to provide funding on both a secured and unsecured basis to financial service providers.

The Company’s overseas subsidiaries, Oppenheimer Europe Ltd. and Oppenheimer Investments Asia Limited, are subject to local regulatory capital requirements, which restrict the Company’s ability to utilize this capital for other purposes. The regulatory capital requirements for Oppenheimer Europe Ltd. and Oppenheimer Investments Asia Limited were $4.1 million and $386,000, respectively, at September 30, 2014. See Note 12 to the condensed consolidated financial statements in Item 1 herein for further details. The liquid assets at Oppenheimer Europe Ltd. are primarily comprised of money market funds and to a lesser extent cash deposits in bank accounts. The liquid assets at Oppenheimer Investments Asia Limited are primarily comprised of investments in U.S. Treasuries and to a lesser extent cash and money market funds. Any restrictions on transfer of

Table of Contents

these liquid assets from Oppenheimer Europe Ltd. and Oppenheimer Investments Asia Limited to the Company or its other subsidiaries would be limited by the regulatory capital requirements.

The Company permanently reinvests eligible earnings of its foreign subsidiaries in such subsidiaries and, accordingly, does not accrue any U.S. income taxes that would arise if these earnings were repatriated. The unrecognized deferred tax liability associated with earnings of foreign subsidiaries, net of associated U.S. foreign tax credits, is estimated at $2.0 million for those subsidiaries with respect to which the Company would be subject to residual U.S. tax on cumulative earnings through 2013 were those earnings to be repatriated. The Company intends to continue to permanently reinvest the excess earnings of Oppenheimer Israel (OPCO) Ltd. in its own business and in the businesses in Europe and Asia to support business initiatives in those regions.

On August 5, 2011, Standard & Poor’s (“S&P”) lowered its long term sovereign credit rating on the United States of America from AAA to AA+. Credit agencies have also reduced the credit ratings of various sovereign nations, including Italy and France. The negative impact of any future downgrade could adversely affect our credit ratings, as well as those of our clients and/or counterparties and could require us to post additional collateral on loans collateralized by U.S. Treasury securities. See Item 1A “Risk Factors – The recent downgrade of U.S. long term sovereign debt obligations and issues affecting the sovereign debt of European nations may adversely affect markets and our business” in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

In February 2010, Oppenheimer finalized settlements with the Regulators concluding investigations and administrative proceedings concerning Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of ARS. Pursuant to those settlements and legal settlements and awards, the Company has purchased and will, subject to the terms and conditions of the settlements, continue to purchase ARS on a periodic basis. The ultimate amount of ARS to be repurchased by the Company cannot be predicted with any certainty and will be impacted by redemptions by issuers and legal and other actions by clients during the relevant period which cannot be predicted. See “Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements” herein.

Additional settlements of regulatory matters could have an adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity depending on the size and composition of any such settlement.

Refinancing

On April 12, 2011, the Company completed the private placement of $200.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 8.75% Senior Secured Notes due April 15, 2018 (the “Notes”) at par. Interest on the Notes is payable semi-annually on April 15th and October 15th. Proceeds from the private placement were used to retire the Senior Secured Credit Note due 2013 ($22.4 million) and the Subordinated Note due 2014 ($100.0 million) and for other general corporate purposes. The private placement resulted in the fixing of the interest rate over the term of the Notes compared to the variable rate debt that was retired and an extension of the debt maturity dates as described above. The Notes were non-callable until April 2014. The cost to issue the Notes was approximately $4.6 million which was capitalized in the second quarter of 2011 and is amortized over the period of the Notes.

At September 30, 2014, the remaining unamortized debt issuance costs were $1.7 million.

On July 12, 2011, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-4, filed to register the exchange of the Notes for fully registered Notes, was declared effective by the SEC. The Exchange Offer was completed in its entirety on August 9, 2011.

On April 4, 2012, the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed to enable the Company to act as a market maker in connection with the Notes was declared effective by the SEC.

On May 28, 2014, Moody’s Corporation affirmed the Company’s ‘B2’ Corporate Family rating and ‘B2’ rating on the Notes with a stable outlook. On August 8, 2014, S&P affirmed the Company and its Notes “B” rating and revised its outlook on the Notes to stable from positive.

Table of Contents

On April 15, 2014, the Company retired early a total of $50.0 million (25%) of the Notes. The Company redeemed $45.0 million aggregate principal amount of the outstanding Notes at a redemption price equal to 106.563% of the principal amount of the Notes, plus accrued and unpaid interest. In addition, the Company retired the $5.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes that it held. Upon completion of the redemption and retirement on April 15, 2014, $150.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Notes remains outstanding. The retirement of the Notes will reduce the Company’s interest costs by $3.9 million annually beginning in the second quarter of 2014.

Liquidity

For the most part, the Company’s assets consist of cash and assets which can be readily converted into cash. Receivable from brokers, dealers and clearing organizations represents deposits for securities borrowed transactions, margin deposits or current transactions awaiting settlement. Receivable from customers represents margin balances and amounts due on transactions awaiting settlement. The Company’s receivables are, for the most part, collateralized by marketable securities. The Company’s collateral maintenance policies and procedures are designed to limit the Company’s exposure to credit risk. Securities owned, with the exception of the ARS, are mainly comprised of actively trading, readily marketable securities. The Company advanced $4.0 million in forgivable notes to employees (which are inherently illiquid) for the three months ended September 30, 2014 ($5.4 million for the three months ended September 30, 2013) as upfront or backend inducements. The amount of funds allocated to such inducements will vary with hiring activity.

The Company satisfies its need for short-term liquidity from internally generated funds, collateralized and uncollateralized bank borrowings, stock loans and repurchase agreements and warehouse facilities. Bank borrowings are collateralized by firm and customer securities. In addition, letters of credit are issued in the normal course of business to satisfy certain collateral requirements in lieu of depositing cash or securities.

The Company does not repatriate the earnings of its foreign subsidiaries. Foreign earnings are permanently reinvested for the use of the foreign subsidiaries and therefore these foreign earnings are not available to satisfy the domestic liquidity requirements of the Company.

The Company obtains short-term borrowings primarily through bank call loans. Bank call loans are generally payable on demand and bear interest at various rates not exceeding the broker call rate. At September 30, 2014, bank call loans were $135.5 million ($118.2 million at December 31, 2013 and $94.8 million at September 30, 2013). The average bank loan outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $84.4 million and $120.6 million, respectively ($174.6 million and $184.4 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013). The largest bank loan outstanding for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $169.1 million and $247.9 million, respectively ($266.3 million and $392.3 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively). The average weighted interest rate on bank call loans applicable on September 30, 2014 was 1.27%.

At September 30, 2014, securities loaned balances totaled $164.1 million ($211.6 million at December 31, 2013 and $251.8 million at September 30, 2013). The average daily securities loan balance for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $151.3 million and $205.0 million, respectively ($230.2 million and $217.1 million for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013, respectively). The largest stock loan balance for three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 was $212.3 million and $293.4 million, respectively ($292.9 million for both the three and nine months ended September 30, 2013).

The Company finances its government trading operations through the use of securities purchased under agreements to resell (“reverse repurchase agreements”) and securities sold under agreements to repurchase (“repurchase agreements”). Except as described below, repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements, principally involving government and agency securities, are carried at amounts at which securities subsequently will be resold or reacquired as specified in the respective agreements and include accrued interest. Repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are presented on a net-by-counterparty basis, when the repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements are executed with the same counterparty, have the same explicit settlement date, are executed in accordance with a master netting arrangement, the securities underlying the repurchase and reverse repurchase agreements exist in “book entry” form and certain other requirements are met.

Table of Contents

option for these instruments to more accurately reflect market and economic events in its earnings and to mitigate a potential imbalance in earnings caused by using different measurement attributes (i.e. fair value versus carrying value) for certain assets and liabilities. At September 30, 2014, the fair value of the reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements were $250.0 million and $nil, respectively.

At September 30, 2014, the gross balances of reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements were $349.7 million and $788.0 million, respectively. The average daily balance of reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements on a gross basis for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $396.9 million and $938.6 million, respectively ($3.8 billion and $4.3 billion, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2013). The largest amount of reverse repurchase agreements and repurchase agreements outstanding on a gross basis during the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $732.4 million and $1.1 billion, respectively ($6.1 billion and $6.7 billion, respectively, for the three months ended September 30, 2013).

At September 30, 2014, the notional value of the repo-to-maturity was $nil. The average balance for the repo-to-maturity for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was $nil. At September 30, 2014, the gross leverage ratio was 5.4.

As discussed in “Other Regulatory Matters” and “Results of Operations” above, the Company’s operating results during the first and second quarters of 2014 have been significantly impacted by charges associated with regulatory matters. Any settlement of these matters with the regulators and any payment(s) due will have to be funded by the Company out of the results of operations for any such period, cash held and available for such payment, credit available under the Company’s uncommitted bank lines, and/or changes in the holdings of the Company on its balance sheet based on the amount that is ultimately due to be paid and the timing of any such payment.

The settlement of these or other regulatory matters could have an adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity depending on the size, composition and timing of any such settlement.

Liquidity Management

The Company manages its need for liquidity on a daily basis to ensure compliance with regulatory requirements. The Company’s liquidity needs may be affected by market conditions, increased inventory positions, business expansion and other unanticipated occurrences. In the event that existing financial resources do not satisfy the Company’s needs, the Company may have to seek additional external financing. The availability of such additional external financing may depend on market factors outside the Company’s control.

The Company regularly reviews its sources of liquidity and financing and conducts internal stress analysis to determine the impact on the Company of events that could remove sources of liquidity or financing and to plan actions the Company could take in the case of such an eventuality. The Company’s reviews have resulted in plans that the Company believes would result in a reduction of assets through liquidation that would significantly reduce the Company’s need for external financing.

Funding Risk



(Expressed in thousands)
	For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
	2014			2013
Cash provided by operating activities	$	13,737		$	22,948
Cash used in investing activities	(3,366		)	(12,642		)
Cash used in financing activities	(30,723		)	(40,315		)
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents	$	(20,352	)	$	(30,009	)

Table of Contents

Management believes that funds from operations, combined with the Company’s capital base and available credit facilities, are sufficient for the Company’s liquidity needs in the foreseeable future. Changes in capital requirements under international standards that will impact the costs and relative returns on loans may cause banks including those with whom the Company relies to back away from providing funding to the securities industry. Such a development might impact the Company’s ability to finance its day to day activities or increase the costs to acquire funding. The Company may or may not be able to pass such increased funding costs on to its clients. (See “Factors Affecting ‘Forward-Looking Statements’”).

Other Matters

On August 29, 2014, the Company paid cash dividends of $0.11 per share of Class A and Class B Stock totaling approximately $1.5 million from available cash on hand.

On October 30, 2014, the Board of Directors declared a regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.11 per share of Class A and Class B Stock payable on November 28, 2014 to stockholders of record on November 14, 2014.

The book value of the Company’s Class A and Class B Stock was $38.63 at September 30, 2014 compared to $37.68 at September 30, 2013, based on total outstanding shares of 13,630,368 and 13,542,439, respectively.

The diluted weighted average number of shares of Class A and Class B Stock outstanding for the three months ended September 30, 2014 was 14,297,442 compared to 14,171,802 outstanding for the same period in 2013.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

In February 2010, Oppenheimer finalized settlements with the Regulators concluding investigations and administrative proceedings by the Regulators concerning Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of ARS. Pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators, Oppenheimer agreed to extend offers to repurchase ARS from certain of its clients subject to certain terms and conditions more fully described below. In addition to the settlements with the Regulators, Oppenheimer has also reached settlements of and received adverse awards in legal proceedings with various clients where the Company is obligated to purchase ARS. Pursuant to completed Purchase Offers (as defined) under the settlements with Regulators and client related legal settlements and awards to purchase ARS, as of September 30, 2014, the Company purchased and holds (net of redemptions) approximately $94.8 million in ARS from its clients. In addition, the Company is committed to purchase another $13.1 million from clients through 2016 under legal settlements and awards.

Outside of the settlements with the Regulators, the Company has also reached various legal settlements with clients and received unfavorable legal awards requiring it to purchase ARS. The terms and conditions including the ARS amounts committed to be purchased under legal settlements are based on the specific facts and circumstances of each legal proceeding. In most instances, the purchase commitments are in increments and extend over a period of time. At September 30, 2014, no ARS purchase commitments related to legal settlements extended past 2016. To the extent the Company receives an unfavorable award, the Company usually must purchase the ARS provided for by the award within 30 days of the rendering of the award. The ultimate amount of ARS to be repurchased by the Company under both the settlements with Regulators and the legal settlements and awards cannot be predicted with any certainty and will be impacted by redemptions by issuers, the Company’s financial and regulatory constraints, and legal and other actions by clients during the relevant period, which also cannot be predicted.

Table of Contents

The ARS positions that the Company owns and are committed to purchase primarily represent auction rate preferred securities issued by closed-end funds and, to a lesser extent, municipal auction rate securities which are municipal bonds wrapped by municipal bond insurance and student loan auction rate securities which are asset-backed securities backed by student loans. At September 30, 2014, the amount of ARS held by the Company that was below investment grade was $3.6 million and the amount of ARS that was unrated was $75,000.



(Expressed in thousand)
Auction Rate Securities Owned and Committed to Purchase at September 30, 2014
Product	Principal		Valuation Adjustment		Fair Value
Auction Rate Securities (“ARS”) Owned ⁽¹⁾	$	94,800	$	7,477	$	87,323
ARS Commitments to Purchase Pursuant to: ⁽²⁾⁽³⁾
Settlements with the Regulators ⁽⁴⁾	—		—		—
Legal Settlements and Awards ⁽⁵⁾	13,072		1,037		12,035
Total	$	107,872	$	8,514	$	99,358


(1)	Principal amount represents the par value of the ARS and is included in securities owned in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2014. The valuation adjustment amount is included as a reduction to securities owned in the condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2014.


(2)	Principal amount represents the present value of the ARS par value that the Company is committed to purchase at a future date. This principal amount is presented as an off-balance sheet item. The valuation adjustment amount is included in accounts payable and other liabilities on the condensed consolidated balance sheet at September 30, 2014.


(3)	Specific ARS to be purchased under ARS Purchase Commitments are unknown until the beneficial owner selects the individual ARS to be purchased.


(4)	Commitments to purchase under settlements with the Regulators at September 30, 2014. Eligible Investors for future buybacks under the settlements with the Regulators held approximately $106.1 million of ARS as of September 30, 2014.


(5)	Commitments to purchase under various legal settlements and awards with clients through 2016.

Per the above table, the Company has recorded a valuation adjustment on its ARS owned and ARS purchase commitments of $8.5 million as of September 30, 2014. The valuation adjustment is comprised of $7.5 million which represents the difference between the principal value and the fair value of the ARS the Company owns as of September 30, 2014 and $1.0 million which represents the difference between the principal value and the fair value of the ARS the Company is committed to purchase under the settlements with the Regulators and legal settlements and awards. As of September 30, 2014, the Company did not have any outstanding ARS purchase commitments related to the settlements with Regulators. However, Eligible Investors for future buybacks under the settlements with Regulators held approximately $106.1 million of ARS as of September 30, 2014. Since the Company was not committed to purchase this amount as of September 30, 2014, there were no valuation adjustments booked to recognize the difference between the principal value and the fair value for this remaining amount.

On October 30, 2014, the Company and CIBC reached an agreement pursuant to which the Company will pay the disputed $25.0 million, which as previously reported had been fully reserved and placed in an escrow by the Company with an escrow agent, as well as certain related costs to CIBC and CIBC agreed to dismiss the arbitration. On October 31, 2014, the Company paid these amounts to CIBC. See "Legal Proceedings – Other Pending Matters."

Additional information concerning the Company’s off-balance sheet arrangements is included in Note 5 to the condensed consolidated financial statements.

Table of Contents

Contractual and Contingent Obligations

The following table sets forth the Company’s contractual and contingent commitments as of September 30, 2014:



(Expressed in millions)
	Total		Less than 1 year		1-3 Years		3-5 Years		More than 5 Years
Minimum rentals	$	309	$	40	$	73	$	61	$	135
Committed Capital	5		5		—		—		—
Earn-Out ⁽¹⁾	25		25		—		—		—
Senior Secured Notes ⁽²⁾	202		13		26		163		—
ARS Purchase Commitments ⁽³⁾	13		11		2		—		—
Total	$	554	$	94	$	101	$	224	$	135


(1)	As noted above in the Liquidity section, this amount was paid on October 31, 2014.


(2)	Includes interest payable of $52.5 million through maturity.


(3)	Represents payments to be made pursuant to the ARS settlements entered into with the Regulators in February 2010 as well as commitments to purchase ARS as a result of settlements with the Regulators and legal settlements and awards.

Inflation

Because the assets of the Company’s brokerage subsidiaries are highly liquid, and because securities inventories are carried at current market values, the impact of inflation generally is reflected in the financial statements. However, the rate of inflation affects the Company’s costs relating to employee compensation, rent, communications and certain other operating costs, and such costs may not be recoverable in the level of commissions or fees charged. To the extent inflation results in rising interest rates and has other adverse effects upon the securities markets, it may adversely affect the Company’s financial position and results of operations.

Factors Affecting “Forward-Looking Statements”

From time to time, the Company may publish “Forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act and Section 21E of the Exchange Act or make oral statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements may relate to such matters as anticipated financial performance, future revenues or earnings, business prospects, projected ventures, new products, anticipated market performance, and similar matters. The Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 provides a safe harbor for forward-looking statements. In order to comply with the terms of the safe harbor, the Company cautions readers that a variety of factors could cause the Company’s actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or other expectations expressed in the Company’s forward-looking statements. These risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the Company’s control, include, but are not limited to: (i) transaction volume in the securities markets, (ii) the volatility of the securities markets, (iii) fluctuations in interest rates, (iv) changes in regulatory requirements which could affect the cost and method of doing business and reduce returns, (v) fluctuations in currency rates, (vi) general economic conditions, both domestic and international, (vii) changes in the rate of inflation and the related impact on the securities markets, (viii) competition from existing financial institutions and other participants in the securities markets, (ix) legal developments affecting the litigation experience of the securities industry and the Company, including developments arising from the failure of the Auction Rate Securities markets, the trading of low-priced securities, stepped up enforcement efforts by the SEC, FinCEN and other regulators and the results of pending litigation involving the Company, (x) changes in federal and state tax laws which could affect the popularity of products sold by the Company or impose taxes on securities transactions, (xi) the effectiveness of efforts to reduce costs and eliminate overlap, (xii) war and nuclear confrontation as well as political unrest and regime changes and health epidemics, (xiii) the Company’s ability to achieve its business plan, (xiv) corporate governance issues, (xv) the impact of the credit crisis and tight credit markets on business operations, (xvi) the effect of bailout, financial reform and related legislation including, without limitation, the Dodd-Frank Act and the Volcker Rule and the rules and regulations thereunder, (xvii) the consolidation of the banking and financial services industry, (xviii) the effects of the economy on the Company’s ability to find and maintain financing options and liquidity, (xix) credit, operations, legal and regulatory risks, (xx) risks related to foreign operations, (xxi) risks related to the downgrade of U.S. long-term sovereign debt obligations and the sovereign debt of European nations, (xxii) risks related to the manipulation of LIBOR and concerns over high speed trading, (xxiii) the effects of Hurricane Sandy and the relocation of critical Company personnel, (xxiv) risks related to the lowering by S&P of its rating on the Company and on the Notes, and (xxv) risks related to pending election results, Congressional gridlock, government shutdowns and threats of default by the federal government. There can be no assurance that the Company has correctly or completely identified and assessed all of the

Table of Contents

factors affecting the Company’s business. The Company does not undertake any obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements. See Item 1A – “Risk Factors” appearing in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, there were no material changes to the information contained in Part II, Item 7A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

The Company carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of its disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a–15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Based on this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.

Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, does not expect that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures or its internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further, the design of a control system must reflect the fact that there are resource constraints and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent limitations include, but are not limited to, the realities that judgments in decision–making can be faulty and that break-downs can occur because of a simple error or omission. Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the control. The design of any system of controls also is based, in part, upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost–effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected. The Company confirms that its management, including its Chief Executive Officer and its Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required to be disclosed by the Company in its reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act) during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1. Legal Proceedings

Many aspects of the Company’s business involve substantial risks of liability. In the normal course of business, the Company has been the subject of customer complaints and has been named as a defendant or co-defendant in various lawsuits or arbitrations creating substantial exposure. The incidences of these types of claims have increased since the onset of the credit crisis in 2008 and the resulting market disruptions. The Company is also involved from time to time in certain governmental and self-regulatory agency investigations and proceedings. These proceedings arise primarily from securities brokerage, asset management and investment banking activities. There has been an increased incidence of regulatory investigations in the financial services industry in recent years, including customer claims, which seek substantial penalties, fines or other monetary relief. The SEC, amongst other regulators, has announced its intention to bring more regulatory cases seeking substantial penalties in the future.

While the ultimate resolution of routine pending litigation and other matters cannot be currently determined, in the opinion of management, after consultation with legal counsel, the Company does not believe that the resolution of these matters will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition. However, the Company’s results of operations could be materially affected during any period if liabilities in that period differ from prior estimates.

Notwithstanding the foregoing, an adverse result in any of the matters set forth below or multiple adverse results in arbitrations and litigations currently filed or to be filed against the Company, including arbitrations and litigations relating to auction rate securities, could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition, including its cash position.

The materiality of legal matters to the Company’s future operating results depends on the level of future results of operations as well as the timing and ultimate outcome of such legal matters. See “Risk Factors – The Company may continue to be adversely affected by the failure of the Auction Rate Securities Market” in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Regulatory and Legal Environment – Other Regulatory Matters and – Other Matters” as well as “Factors Affecting ‘Forward-Looking Statements’” herein.

In accordance with applicable accounting guidance, the Company establishes reserves for litigation and regulatory matters when those matters present loss contingencies that are both probable and reasonably estimable. When loss contingencies are not both probable and reasonably estimable, the Company does not establish reserves. In some of the matters described below, loss contingencies are not probable and reasonably estimable in the view of management and, accordingly, reserves have not been established for those matters. For certain cases, the Company does not believe that an estimate can currently be made. Any loss estimates are based on various factors, including the varying stages of the proceedings (including the fact that many are currently in preliminary stages), the numerous yet-unresolved issues in many of the proceedings and the attendant uncertainty of the various potential outcomes of such proceedings. Accordingly, the Company’s estimate will change from time to time, and actual losses may be more than the current estimate.

Auction Rate Securities Matters

For a number of years, the Company offered auction rate securities (“ARS”) to its clients. A significant portion of the market in ARS ‘failed’ in February 2008 due to credit market conditions, and dealers were no longer willing or able to purchase the imbalance between supply and demand for ARS. Oppenheimer offered ARS to its clients in the same manner as dozens of other “downstream” firms in the ARS marketplace – as an available cash management option for clients seeking to increase their yields on short-term investments similar to a money market fund. The Company believes that Oppenheimer’s participation therefore differs dramatically from that of the larger broker-dealers who underwrote and provided supporting bids in the auctions, actions Oppenheimer never undertook. Oppenheimer played no role in any decision by the lead underwriters or broker-dealers to discontinue entering support bids and allowing auctions to fail. See “Risk Factors – The Company may continue to be adversely affected by the failure of the Auction Rate Securities Market” in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 as well as “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Business Environment – Other Regulatory Matters and – Other Matters” herein.

As previously disclosed, Oppenheimer, without admitting or denying liability, entered into a Consent Order (the “Order”) with the Massachusetts Securities Division (the “MSD”) pursuant to the Massachusetts Uniform Securities Act on February 26, 2010 settling a pending administrative proceeding against the respondents related to Oppenheimer’s sales of ARS to retail and other investors in the Commonwealth of Massachusetts.

Table of Contents

As previously disclosed, on February 23, 2010, the New York Attorney General (“NYAG” and together with the MSD, the “Regulators”) accepted Oppenheimer’s offer of settlement and entered an Assurance of Discontinuance (“AOD”) pursuant to New York State Executive Law Section 63(15) in connection with Oppenheimer’s marketing and sale of ARS. Oppenheimer did not admit or deny any of the findings or allegations contained in the AOD and no fine was imposed.

Pursuant to the terms of the Order, Oppenheimer commenced and closed three offers to purchase Eligible ARS (as defined in the Order) from Customer Accounts (as defined in the Order) during 2010 and 2011 with the final offer closing on April 7, 2011. In addition, pursuant to the terms of the AOD, the Company has made seven offers to purchase ARS from Eligible Investors between the periods May 21, 2010 and December 13, 2013. The Company commenced an eighth offer to purchase on March 28, 2014 which expired on June 11, 2014. The Company’s purchases of ARS from clients have continued and will, subject to the terms and conditions of the AOD, continue on a periodic basis. Accounts were, and will continue to be, aggregated on a “household” basis for purposes of these offers. As of September 30, 2014, the Company had purchased and holds (net of redemptions) approximately $94.8 million of ARS pursuant to the settlements with the Regulators and legal settlements and awards.

Oppenheimer has agreed with the NYAG that it will offer to purchase Eligible ARS from Eligible Investors who did not receive an initial purchase offer, periodically, as excess funds become available to Oppenheimer after giving effect to the financial and regulatory capital constraints applicable to Oppenheimer, until Oppenheimer has extended a purchase offer to all Eligible Investors. Such offers will remain open for a period of seventy-five days from the date on which each such offer to purchase is sent. The ultimate amount of ARS to be repurchased by the Company cannot be predicted with any certainty and will be impacted by redemptions by issuers and client actions during the period, which also cannot be predicted.

In addition, Oppenheimer has agreed to work with issuers and other interested parties, including regulatory and other authorities and industry participants, to provide liquidity solutions for other Massachusetts clients not covered by the offers to purchase. In that regard, on May 21, 2010, Oppenheimer offered such clients a margin loan against marginable collateral with respect to such account holders’ holdings of Eligible ARS. As of September 30, 2014, Oppenheimer had extended margin loans to six holders of Eligible ARS from Massachusetts.

Further, Oppenheimer has agreed to (1) no later than 75 days after Oppenheimer has completed extending a purchase offer to all Eligible Investors (as defined in the AOD), use its best efforts to identify any Eligible Investor who purchased Eligible ARS (as defined in the AOD) and subsequently sold those securities below par between February 13, 2008 and February 23, 2010 and pay the investor the difference between par and the price at which the Eligible Investor sold the Eligible ARS, plus reasonable interest thereon (the “ARS Losses”); (2) no later than 75 days after Oppenheimer has completed extending a Purchase Offer to all Eligible Investors, use its best efforts to identify Eligible Investors who took out loans from Oppenheimer after February 13, 2008 that were secured by Eligible ARS that were not successfully auctioning at the time the loan was taken out from Oppenheimer and who paid interest associated with the ARS-based portion of those loans in excess of the total interest and dividends received on the Eligible ARS during the duration of the loan (the “Loan Cost Excess”) and reimburse such investors for the Loan Cost Excess plus reasonable interest thereon; (3) upon providing liquidity to all Eligible Investors, participate in a special arbitration process for the exclusive purpose of arbitrating any Eligible Investor’s claim for consequential damages against Oppenheimer related to the investor’s inability to sell Eligible ARS; and (4) work with issuers and other interested parties, including regulatory and governmental entities, to expeditiously provide liquidity solutions for institutional investors not within the definition of Small Businesses and Institutions (as defined in the AOD) that held ARS in Oppenheimer brokerage accounts on February 13, 2008. Oppenheimer believes that because Items (1) through (3) above will occur only after it has provided liquidity to all Eligible Investors, it will take an extended period of time before the requirements of Items (1) through (3) will take effect.

Each of the AOD and the Order provides that in the event that Oppenheimer enters into another agreement that provides any form of benefit to any Oppenheimer ARS customer on terms more favorable than those set forth in the AOD or the Order, Oppenheimer will immediately extend the more favorable terms contained in such other agreement to all eligible investors. The AOD further provides that if Oppenheimer pays (or makes any pledge or commitment to pay) to any governmental entity or regulator pursuant to any other agreement costs or a fine or penalty or any other monetary amount, then an equivalent payment, pledge or commitment will become immediately owed to the State of New York for the benefit of New York residents.

If Oppenheimer fails to comply with any of the terms set forth in the Order, the MSD may institute an action to have the Order declared null and void and reinstitute the previously pending administrative proceedings. If Oppenheimer defaults on any obligation under the AOD, the NYAG may terminate the AOD, at his sole discretion, upon 10 days written notice to Oppenheimer.

Table of Contents

Reference is made to the Order and the AOD, each as described in Item 3 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 and attached thereto as Exhibits 10.24 and 10.22 respectively, as well as the subsequent disclosures related thereto in the Company’s Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 through June 30, 2014 and in the Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K for the years ended December 31, 2010 through and including 2013, for additional details of the agreements with the MSD and NYAG. The Company is continuing to cooperate with investigating entities from states other than Massachusetts and New York.

In connection with a case formerly brought by U.S. Airways on July 10, 2009, Oppenheimer asserted a third party statement of claim against Deutsche Bank Securities, Inc. (“DBSI”) and Deutsche Bank A.G. (“Deutsche AG”). Deutsche AG challenged Oppenheimer’s efforts to compel Deutsche AG to appear at a FINRA arbitration since, Deutsche AG argued, it is not a FINRA member. Subsequently, Oppenheimer deferred further action against Deutsche AG and proceeded prosecuting its third party claim against DBSI. DBSI subsequently filed a motion to sever the arbitration into a separate proceeding which motion was granted on July 28, 2010. On January 28, 2011, DBSI filed a motion to stay the DBSI arbitration which motion was granted on May 25, 2011. As a result of the award in favor of U.S. Airways in January 2013, the stay was lifted and Oppenheimer began prosecuting its claim in arbitration against DBSI in an effort to, among other things, recover in full the amount of $30.0 million including interest paid to U.S. Airways plus all associated costs. The arbitration commenced on May 5, 2014 and will likely continue through the fourth quarter of 2014. There can be no assurance Oppenheimer will prevail in the arbitration against DBSI or that it will recover any or all of the amounts paid by Oppenheimer to U.S. Airways.

In addition to the ARS case discussed above, as of September 30, 2014, Oppenheimer and certain affiliated parties are currently named as a defendant or respondent in approximately two arbitration claims before FINRA, as well as one court action brought by individuals and entities who purchased ARS through Oppenheimer in amounts ranging from $225,000 to $2.1 million, seeking awards compelling Oppenheimer to repurchase such ARS or, alternatively, awards rescinding such sales, based on a variety of causes of action. The Company has filed, or is in the process of filing, its responses to such claims and has participated in or is awaiting hearings regarding such claims before FINRA or in the court action. As of September 30, 2014, ten ARS matters were concluded in either court or arbitration with Oppenheimer prevailing in four of those matters and the claimants prevailing in six of those matters. The Company has purchased approximately $7.6 million in ARS from the prevailing claimants in those six actions. In addition, the Company has made cash payments of approximately $12.7 million as a result of legal settlements with clients. Oppenheimer believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims in the pending arbitrations and court action and intends to vigorously defend against these claims. Oppenheimer may also implead third parties, including underwriters, where it believes such action is appropriate. It is possible that other individuals or entities that purchased ARS from Oppenheimer may bring additional claims against Oppenheimer in the future for repurchase or rescission.

See Item 1A, “Risk Factors – The Company may continue to be adversely affected by the failure of the Auction Rate Securities Market” in Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013 and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Regulatory and Legal Environment – Other Regulatory Matters and – Other Matters” herein.

Other Pending Matters

On or about March 13, 2008, Oppenheimer was served in a matter pending in the United States Bankruptcy Court, Northern District of Georgia, captioned William Perkins, Trustee for International Management Associates v. Lehman Brothers, Oppenheimer & Co. Inc., JB Oxford & Co., Bank of America Securities LLC and TD Ameritrade Inc. The Trustee seeks to set aside as fraudulent transfers in excess of $25.0 million in funds embezzled by the sole portfolio manager for International Management Associates, a hedge fund. Said portfolio manager purportedly used the broker dealer defendants, including Oppenheimer, as conduits for his embezzlement. Oppenheimer filed its answer to the complaint on June 18, 2010. Oppenheimer filed a motion for summary judgment, which was argued on March 31, 2011. Immediately thereafter, the Bankruptcy Court dismissed all of the Trustee’s claims against all defendants including Oppenheimer. In June 2011, the Trustee filed an appeal with the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia (U.S.N.D. GA). In addition, on June 10, 2011, the Trustee filed a petition for permission to appeal the dismissal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit. On July 27, 2011, the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit denied the Trustee’s Petition. The Trustee then appealed to U.S.N.D. GA. On March 30, 2012, the U.S.N.D. GA affirmed in part and reversed in part the ruling from the Bankruptcy Court and remanded the matter to the Bankruptcy Court. Discovery has closed and Oppenheimer filed a motion for summary judgment at the end of February 2014. Oppenheimer believes that as a result of previous court rulings in this matter, the claimed damages against Oppenheimer have been substantially reduced and that it has meritorious defenses to the remaining claims made against it and intends to defend itself vigorously.

Table of Contents

On June 24, 2011, Oppenheimer was served with a petition in a matter pending in state court in Collin County, Texas captioned Jerry Lancaster, Providence Holdings, Inc., Falcon Holdings, LLC and Derek Lancaster v. Oppenheimer & Co., Inc., Oppenheimer Trust Company, Charles Antonuicci, Alan Reichman, John Carley, Park Avenue Insurance, LLC and Park Avenue Bank. The action requests unspecified damages, including exemplary damages, for Oppenheimer’s alleged breach of fiduciary duty, negligent hiring, fraud, conversion, conspiracy, breach of contract, unjust enrichment and violation of the Texas Business and Commerce Code. The first amended petition alleges that Oppenheimer held itself out as having expertise in the insurance industry generally and managing insurance companies’ investment portfolios but inappropriately allowed plaintiffs’ bond portfolios to be used by Park Avenue Insurance Company to secure the sale of Providence Property and Casualty Insurance Company to Park Avenue Insurance Company. On July 22, 2011, defendants removed the case to the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Sherman Division, and subsequently moved to dismiss or transfer the action. On October 5, 2011 plaintiffs filed a voluntary dismissal without prejudice. On the same date, Oppenheimer and Oppenheimer Trust Company agreed to suspend the running of any applicable statute of limitations defense for one year. Just prior to the expiration of the one-year tolling agreement, on October 3, 2012, Providence Holdings, Inc. filed a new action in the United States District Court for the Eastern Division of Texas against Oppenheimer, Oppenheimer Trust Company, and two individuals, re-asserting basically the same claims. On December 18, 2012, Oppenheimer and Oppenheimer Trust Company filed motions (i) to dismiss the new complaint and (ii) to stay the action pending resolution of all claims among the parties in the action pending in Oklahoma styled State of Oklahoma ex rel. Holland v. Providence Holdings, Inc. In response to the motions, plaintiffs’ counsel voluntarily agreed to stay their action until the resolution of all claims among the parties in the Oklahoma action. On March 18, 2013, the Texas court issued an order formally approving the parties’ stipulation to stay the action. On April 15, 2011, in an action styled State of Oklahoma ex rel. Holland v. Providence Holdings, Inc., et al., in the Oklahoma County District Court, Providence Holdings, Inc. and Jerry Lancaster asserted cross-claims against Oppenheimer and Oppenheimer Trust Company Inc. related to the same facts at issue in the Texas litigation discussed above. These cross-claims included claims for breach of fiduciary duty, various theories of fraud, violation of Texas commercial statutes, breach of contract, interference with prospective business advantage, and loss of business opportunity and sought undisclosed damages.

Oppenheimer believes it has meritorious defenses to the claims raised and intends to defend against these claims vigorously including pursuing dismissal of the claims against it.

On March 15, 2013, the Company filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York ("New York Court"), a breach of contract action against Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (“CIBC”) in connection with the Company’s acquisition of CIBC’s U.S. capital markets businesses for an amount of damages to be proven at trial. As part of the transaction, the parties had provided for a deferred purchase price based on an agreed formula or a minimum payment of $25.0 million. The deferred purchase price amount would have been otherwise due in April 2013 absent the breach of the agreements governing the sale of the business asserted by the Company in its complaint. The agreed-upon formula did not result in any additional payments and thus the minimum payment amount of $25.0 million is in dispute. The Company has deposited the $25.0 million in escrow pending the outcome of the legal proceedings and the expense related to the deferred purchase price was charged to earnings by the Company over the life of the agreement and was fully accrued for at the end of December 2012. On January 31, 2014, the Company filed an amended complaint. On March 13, 2014, CIBC filed a motion to dismiss portions of the Company’s amended complaint. The motion to dismiss is fully briefed and is pending before the court. Discovery in the case is proceeding.

On June 6, 2013, CIBC filed a demand for arbitration with the American Arbitration Association seeking an award of the $25.0 million deferred purchase price, along with interest and costs. On October 30, 2014, the Company and CIBC reached an agreement pursuant to which the Company will pay the disputed $25.0 million, which as previously reported had been fully reserved and placed in an escrow by the Company with an escrow agent, as well as certain related costs to CIBC and CIBC agreed to dismiss the arbitration. On October 31, 2014, the Company paid these amounts to CIBC. The Company’s action against CIBC will continue in the New York Court as more fully described above. See also “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Regulatory and Legal Environment – Other Regulatory Matters.”

Table of Contents

Item 1A. Risk Factors

During the nine months ended September 30, 2014, there were no material changes to the information contained in Part I, Item 1A of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2013.

Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds


(a)	During the third quarter of 2014, the Company issued 11,562 shares of Class A Stock pursuant to the Company’s share-based compensation programs for no cash consideration.


(b)	Not applicable.


(c)	Not applicable.

Item 6. Exhibits



31.1			Certification of Albert G. Lowenthal

31.2			Certification of Jeffrey J. Alfano

32			Certification of Albert G. Lowenthal and Jeffrey J. Alfano

101			Interactive data files pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T: (i) the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of September 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, (v) the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 and 2013, and (vi) the notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements.*


*	This information is furnished and not filed for purposes of Sections 11 and 12 of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized, in the City of New York, New York on this 31st day of October, 2014.



OPPENHEIMER HOLDINGS INC.

By:		/s/ Albert G. Lowenthal
		Albert G. Lowenthal, Chairman and Chief Executive Officer
		(Principal Executive Officer)

By:		/s/ Jeffrey J. Alfano
		Jeffrey J. Alfano, Chief Financial Officer
		(Principal Financial and Accounting Officer)