OPTICAL CABLE CORP - Quarter Report: 2003 January (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

[ X ]    QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended January 31, 2003

OR

[    ]    TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from              to             

Commission file number 0-27022

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

5290 Concourse Drive

Roanoke, Virginia 24019

(Address of principal executive offices, including zip code)

(540) 265-0690

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

(1)  Yes  X   No         (2)  Yes  X   No     

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes          No  X 

As of March 12, 2003, 5,452,785 shares of the registrant’s Common Stock, no par value, were outstanding.

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Form 10-Q Index

Three Months Ended January 31, 2003

Table of Contents

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.     Financial Statements

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Balance Sheets

See accompanying condensed notes to condensed financial statements.

2

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Statements of Operations

(Unaudited)

See accompanying condensed notes to condensed financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Statement of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity

(Unaudited)

See accompanying condensed notes to condensed financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

See accompanying condensed notes to condensed financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Three Months Ended January 31, 2003

(Unaudited)

(Continued)

6

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Three Months Ended January 31, 2003

(Unaudited)

(Continued)

7

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Three Months Ended January 31, 2003

(Unaudited)

(Continued)

8

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Three Months Ended January 31, 2003

(Unaudited)

(Continued)

9

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Three Months Ended January 31, 2003

(Unaudited)

(Continued)

10

Table of Contents

OPTICAL CABLE CORPORATION

Condensed Notes to Condensed Financial Statements

Three Months Ended January 31, 2003

(Unaudited)

11

Table of Contents

Item 2.    Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Forward Looking Information

This Form 10-Q may contain certain “forward-looking” information within the meaning of the federal securities laws. The forward-looking information may include, among other information, (i) statements concerning our outlook for the future, (ii) statements of belief, anticipation or expectation, (iii) future plans, strategies or anticipated events, and (iv) similar information and statements concerning matters that are not historical facts. Such forward-looking information is subject to risks and uncertainties that may cause actual events to differ materially from our expectations. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the level of sales to key customers, including distributors; the economic conditions affecting network service providers; corporate spending on information technology; actions by competitors; fluctuations in the price of raw materials (including optical fiber); our dependence on a single manufacturing facility; our ability to protect our proprietary manufacturing technology; market conditions influencing prices or pricing; our dependence on a limited number of suppliers; an adverse outcome in litigation, claims and other actions, and potential litigation, claims and other actions against us; an adverse outcome in regulatory reviews and audits and potential regulatory reviews and audits; technological changes and introductions of new competing products; economic conditions that affect the telecommunications sector, certain technology sectors or the economy as a whole; terrorist attacks or acts of war, particularly given the acts of terrorism against the United States and subsequent military responses by the United States, and any potential future military conflicts; ability to retain key personnel; the impact of changes in accounting policies, including those by the Securities and Exchange Commission; changes in market demand, exchange rates, productivity, weather or market and economic conditions in the areas of the world in which we operate and market our products, and our success in managing the risks involved in the foregoing.

We caution readers that the foregoing list of important factors is not exclusive and we incorporate by reference those factors included in current reports on Form 8-K.

Amounts presented in the following discussion have been rounded to the nearest hundred thousand, unless the amounts are less than one million, in which case the amounts have been rounded to the nearest thousand.

Overview

We are a leading manufacturer of a broad range of tight-buffer fiber optic cables primarily for the local area network and premise markets, often referred to as the enterprise market. Our fiber optic cables are well-suited for use in short to moderate distance applications such as the connection of metropolitan, access and enterprise networks.

We pioneered the design and production of special tight-buffer fiber optic cables for the most demanding military field applications in the early 1980’s–applications requiring rugged, flexible and compact fiber optic cables. At our ISO 9001 registered facility in Roanoke, Virginia, we manufacture a broad range of fiber optic cables for “high bandwidth” transmission of data, video, and audio communications over short to moderate distances. Our cables can be used both indoors and outdoors and utilize a unique tight-buffer coating process and cable construction that provide excellent mechanical and environmental protection for each optical fiber. Our current portfolio of products is built on the evolution and refinement of the original fundamental technology into a comprehensive and versatile product line designed to provide end-users with significant value and performance.

Our fiber optic cables are easy and economical to install, provide a high degree of reliability and offer outstanding performance characteristics. We have designed and implemented an efficient and highly automated manufacturing process based on proprietary technologies. This enables us to produce high quality indoor/outdoor tight-buffer fiber optic cable rapidly and cost efficiently.

12

Table of Contents

We sell our products internationally and domestically through our sales force to our customers, which include original equipment manufacturers, major distributors, regional distributors and various smaller distributors. International net sales were 18.2% and 34.1% for the quarters ending January 31, 2003 and 2002, respectively. Substantially all of our international sales are denominated in U.S. dollars. The lower percentage of international net sales in the first quarter of 2003 compared to the first quarter of 2002 resulted primarily from a large order of one international customer in 2002 that did not recur in 2003.

Net sales consist of gross sales of products less discounts, refunds and returns. Revenue is recognized at the time of product shipment or delivery to the customer (including distributors) provided that the customer takes ownership and assumes risk of loss, based on shipping terms. During the first quarter of 2003, 14.1% of our net sales were attributable to one major domestic distributor. No single customer accounted for more than 10% of our net sales during the first quarter of 2002.

A significant percentage of the selling price of our fiber optic cable is based on the cost of raw materials used. Single-mode fiber is less expensive than multimode fiber, and consequently single-mode fiber optic cables have a lower per unit selling price than comparable multimode fiber optic cables. We believe that the metropolitan and access markets are predominantly the users of single-mode fiber optic cable, and that increasingly, single-mode fiber optic cable is also being used for other short to moderate distance installations where higher bandwidth is required. To the extent that our sales mix shifts toward single-mode cables, we will have to increase the volume of our sales to maintain our current level of net sales.

Cost of goods sold consists of the cost of materials, compensation costs, product warranty costs and overhead related to our manufacturing operations. The largest percentage of costs included in cost of goods sold is attributable to costs of materials which are variable costs as opposed to fixed costs.

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist of the compensation costs for sales and marketing personnel, shipping costs, travel expenses, customer support expenses, trade show expenses, advertising, bad debt expense, the compensation cost for administration, finance and general management personnel, as well as legal and accounting fees and costs incurred to settle litigation or claims and other actions against us, excluding legal and accounting fees and other costs reflected as shareholder litigation settlement expense.

Results of Operations

The following table sets forth selected line items from our statements of operations as a percentage of net sales for the periods indicated:

13

Table of Contents

Net Sales

Net sales decreased 14.4% to $9.7 million for the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 from $11.4 million for the same period in 2002. Net sales for the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 were lower than net sales of $10.6 million for the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2002 and equal to net sales of $9.7 million for the third quarter of fiscal year 2002. The decrease in net sales during first quarter 2003, when compared to the same period last year, was a result of economic weakness that particularly affected the technology and fiber optic cable sectors, and that significantly affected our net sales since the second half of fiscal year 2001. While we believe net sales have begun to stabilize during the second half of fiscal year 2002, we expect to return to the historical patterns of seasonality before the technology sector bubble and subsequent bust, namely relatively lower net sales during the first two quarters of each fiscal year when compared to average quarterly net sales for the fiscal year, and relatively higher net sales during the last two quarters of each fiscal year when compared to average quarterly net sales for the fiscal year. Total fiber meters shipped decreased 11.2% to 33.4 million fiber meters shipped in the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 from 37.7 million fiber meters shipped for the same period in 2002.

During the first quarter of 2003, we experienced an increase in product mix for cable containing multimode fiber (which typically has a higher relative sales price), compared to cable containing single-mode fiber (which typically has a lower relative sales price), when compared to the first quarter of 2002. The percentage of multimode fiber meters shipped to total fiber meters shipped during the first quarter 2003 was 75.2% compared to 63.4% during the first quarter of 2002; however, the impact of the decreased market demand due to overall economic conditions of the industry outweighed the impact on sales resulting from the change in product mix.

Cable containing multimode fiber is generally used for communications over shorter distances where the higher bandwidth capacity and the higher transmission equipment cost of single-mode fiber is not required. Multimode fiber optic cable is often used in datacom applications. Cable containing single-mode fiber is generally used for communications over longer distances and where higher bandwidth capacity is required. Single-mode fiber optic cable is often used in telecom, CATV and various Internet applications.

Gross Profit

Gross profit decreased 22.2% to $3.5 million for the first quarter of 2003 from $4.5 million for the same period in 2002. Gross profit margin, or gross profit as a percentage of net sales, decreased to 35.9% in first quarter 2003 from 39.5% in first quarter 2002, as overall production costs did not decrease at the same relative rate as the decrease in net sales. Although raw material cost per fiber meter shipped decreased during the first quarter of 2003 compared to the first quarter of 2002, manufacturing overhead costs and labor costs per fiber meter shipped remained relatively stable in the first quarter of 2003 compared to the first quarter of 2002. By comparison, the gross profit margin for the fourth of quarter 2002 was 34.8%.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of net sales were 33.8% in the first quarter of 2003 compared to 30.8% in the first quarter of 2002. The higher percentage in first quarter 2003 reflects the fact that net sales for the quarter decreased 14.4% compared to the same period last year, while selling, general and administrative expenses only decreased 6.1% compared to the first quarter of 2002. The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses during first quarter 2003 compared to the same period last year is explained by a number of factors including (i) decreases in sales commissions and shipping costs due to decreased net sales, (ii) decreases in advertising and trade shows expense as a result of attempts to streamline our marketing and advertising efforts, and (iii) decreases in bad debt expense and legal fees (excluding those fees related to the shareholder litigation). These decreases were partially offset by increases

14

Table of Contents

in salaries and related human resources expenses resulting from successful efforts to fill newly created positions in sales and marketing.

Shareholder Litigation Settlement Expense

We recorded a charge during fiscal year 2002 in the amount of $997,000 representing the estimated cost of the settlement of a consolidated shareholder class action lawsuit and related professional fees incurred during fiscal year 2002, net of insurance proceeds; however, there was no charge related to the shareholder litigation in the first quarter of 2002. Of the total amount expensed during fiscal year 2002, approximately $320,000 represented the fair value of the warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.88 per share to be issued in connection with the settlement of the shareholder litigation. Generally accepted accounting principles require the fair value to be adjusted at each reporting period until such time that the warrants are issued and the underlying shares of common stock to be issued on exercise are registered. During the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, we recognized an additional $290,000 of expense resulting from the variable accounting treatment of the warrants. Additionally, we will recognize related income or expense in future periods’ statements of operations until the previously noted requirements are met. Such recognized income or expense will be a non-cash item and have no impact on our net cash flow. The warrant expense portion of the accrued shareholder litigation settlement expense is calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model and, as of January 31, 2003, the closing price of our common stock of $3.22 per share on that day was used in that calculation. The shareholder lawsuit is described in more detail in “Liquidity and Capital Resources” below. Also see “Item 3 - Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in Part 1 of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of the potential non-cash impact on future financial results.

Loss on Impairment of Machinery and Equipment

During the first quarter of fiscal year 2003, we recorded loss on impairment of machinery and equipment totaling $117,000 due to an automation upgrade initiative. The impairment loss relates to certain machinery and equipment not yet placed into service that the Company anticipates will be replaced in conjunction with the automation project. The loss is a non-cash item that represents the write-off of the carrying value of the machinery and equipment anticipated to be replaced. There was no such impairment loss during the first quarter of fiscal year 2002.

Other Income (Expense)

Other expense, net decreased to $16,000 in the first quarter of 2003 from $58,000 in the first quarter of 2002. The decrease was primarily due to reduced interest expense when comparing the first quarter of 2003 to the first quarter of 2002. The lower interest expense results from lower amounts payable under our new credit facility during the first quarter of 2003 compared to amounts payable under our former credit facilities during the first quarter of 2002. See also “Liquidity and Capital Resources” for further discussion of our revolving credit facility.

Income (Loss) Before Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

We incurred a $220,000 loss before tax benefit for the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 whereas we reported income before tax expense of $932,000 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2002. This change was primarily due to a decrease in gross profit of $998,000 and the two non-cash charges recorded during the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 described above under “Shareholder Litigation Settlement Expense” and “Loss on Impairment of Machinery and Equipment,” partially offset by the decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses of $213,000.

15

Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense (Benefit)

Income tax benefit totaled $68,000 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 compared to income tax expense of $328,000 for the first quarter of fiscal year 2002. This change was due primarily to the fact that we incurred a loss before tax benefit for the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 compared to income before tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal year 2002. Additionally, the amounts reflect a change in our expected effective tax rate for 2003 compared to 2002. Our effective tax rate was 31.0% in the first quarter of 2003 compared to 35.2% in the first quarter of 2002.

Fluctuations in our effective tax rates are due primarily to the amount and timing of the tax benefits related to our Extraterritorial Income Exclusion which exempts from federal income taxation a portion of the net profit realized from sales outside of the United States of products manufactured in the United States.

Net Income (Loss)

Net loss for the first quarter of 2003 was $152,000 compared to net income of $604,000 for the first quarter of 2002. This change was due primarily to the fact that we incurred a loss before tax benefit for the first quarter of fiscal year 2003 compared to income before tax expense for the first quarter of fiscal year 2002, partially offset by the recognition of income tax benefit in the first quarter of 2003 compared to income tax expense during the first quarter of 2002.

Financial Condition

Total assets decreased $1.3 million, or 4.0%, to $31.4 million at January 31, 2003, from $32.7 million at October 31, 2002. This decrease was primarily due to a $747,000 decrease in cash resulting from the use of cash on hand to repurchase 21.3% of our outstanding common stock during the first quarter of 2003, a $487,000 decrease in inventories resulting from continuing efforts to appropriately manage inventory levels, and a $306,000 decrease in property and equipment, net, of which $117,000 relates to the loss on impairment of machinery and equipment, partially offset by a $220,000 increase in trade accounts receivable, net.

Total liabilities increased $1.9 million, or 42.1%, to $6.4 million at January 31, 2003, from $4.5 million at October 31, 2002. This increase was primarily due to a $2.1 million increase in note payable to our bank under our line of credit. The increase in note payable was due to the use of proceeds from borrowings against the line of credit to repurchase 21.3% of our outstanding common stock during the first quarter of 2003.

Total shareholders’ equity at January 31, 2003 decreased $3.2 million, or 11.3% in the first quarter of 2003. The decrease resulted primarily from the repurchase of 21.3% of our outstanding common stock during the first quarter of 2003. The repurchased common stock was retired.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

In addition to the repurchase of 21.3% of our outstanding common stock during the first quarter of 2003, our primary capital needs have been to fund working capital requirements and capital expenditures. Our primary source of capital for these purposes has been cash provided from operations and borrowings under our bank line of credit described below. The outstanding balance under our line of credit totaled $2.1 million at January 31, 2003, an increase of $2.1 million from October 31, 2002.

We had no cash on hand at January 31, 2003, a decrease of $747,000 compared to October 31, 2002. The decrease in cash in the first quarter of 2003 was primarily due to net cash used in financing activities of $991,000 and the purchase of property and equipment totaling $63,000, partially offset by net cash provided by operating activities of $308,000.

16

Table of Contents

We have entered into an amended and restated supply agreement to purchase raw optical fiber from one supplier. Additionally, we have amended a supply agreement to purchase raw optical fiber with a second supplier. While this amended agreement sets forth certain quantities to be purchased for calendar years 2003, 2004 and 2005, it allows carryover of the purchase commitment to future years without penalty in the event the target quantities in any year are not met; provided that the aggregate amount of the purchase commitment under the amended supply agreement must be satisfied by December 31, 2005. Alternative suppliers exist that could provide this material at a similar cost in the event these suppliers are unable or unwilling to perform under the contracts. See “Contractual Obligations and Commitments” below.

On January 31, 2003, we had working capital of $14.5 million, compared to $15.5 million as of October 31, 2002, an decrease of $1.0 million. The ratio of current assets to current liabilities as of January 31, 2003, was 4.4 to 1, compared to 4.6 to 1 as of October 31, 2002. The decrease in working capital during the first quarter of 2003 was primarily caused by a $747,000 decrease in cash and a $487,000 decrease in inventories partially offset by a $220,000 decrease in trade accounts receivable, net and a $107,000 decrease in accounts payable, accrued expenses and accrued compensation and payroll taxes.

Net cash provided by operating activities was $308,000 in the first quarter of 2003, compared to $1.9 million in the first quarter of 2002. Net cash provided by operating activities during the first quarter of 2003 primarily resulted from certain adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by operating activities, including depreciation, amortization and accretion of $289,000, bad debt expense of $113,000 shareholder litigation settlement expense of $291,000 and loss on impairment of machinery and equipment of $117,000. Additionally, a $487,000 decrease in inventories, partially offset by an increase of $334,000 in trade accounts receivable contributed to net cash provided by operating activities. Net cash provided by operating activities during the first quarter of 2002 primarily resulted from cash provided by operating income, a $1.0 million decrease in trade accounts receivable, a $224,000 decrease in inventories, and a $301,000 decrease in income taxes refundable, partially offset by a total decrease of $597,000 in accounts payable, accrued expenses (including accrued compensation and payroll taxes) and other liabilities, and a total increase of $200,000 in other receivables and prepaid expenses.

Net cash used in investing activities totaled $63,000 in the first quarter of 2003, compared to net cash provided by investing activities of $242,000 in the first quarter of 2002. Net cash used in investing activities during the first quarter 2003 resulted entirely from purchases of property and equipment. Net cash provided by investing activities during the first quarter of 2002 primarily resulted from $367,000 provided by the receipt of the cash surrender value of a life insurance policy on a former officer, partially offset by $125,000 in purchases of property and equipment. There are no material commitments for capital expenditures as of January 31, 2003.

Net cash used in financing activities was $991,000 in the first quarter of 2003, compared to $1.7 million in the first quarter of 2002. Net cash used in financing activities in first quarter 2003 was primarily the result of the repurchase of common stock with a total cost, including brokerage fees, of $3.0 million, partially offset by proceeds from notes payable to our bank under our line of credit. Net cash used in financing activities in the first quarter of 2002 was the result of repayments on notes payable to our bank under our lines of credit.

On April 18, 2002, we entered into a new revolving credit facility with Wachovia Bank, National Association (formerly First Union National Bank). The new three-year credit facility provides up to a maximum of $25 million and replaced our previous $9.5 million credit facility. The facility is collateralized by all of our tangible and intangible assets. Borrowings under the credit facility are subject to certain coverage ratios, advance limits and qualifications that are applied to our accounts receivable, inventory and fixed assets. Our ability to access the full amount of the credit facility will depend on the future growth of our borrowing base. As of January 31, 2003, we had $2.1 million outstanding under the new credit facility, with approximately $6.9 million unused and available.

17

Table of Contents

The credit facility bears interest at one-half of one percent (0.50%) per annum above the prime rate (4.75% as of January 31, 2003). During the first quarter of 2003, we met certain fixed charge coverage ratio requirements and the interest rate on the credit facility was reduced from three-quarters of 1% (0.75%) per annum above the prime rate (5.50% as of October 31, 2003) in accordance with the loan and security agreement. The facility also provides a LIBOR based rate at our option.

We believe that our cash flow from operations and our credit facility will be adequate to fund our operations for at least the next twelve months.

On September 27, 2000, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act against us in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The lawsuit alleged a pattern or practice of discrimination on the bases of gender and race. The lawsuit sought injunctive and other relief and damages in an unspecified amount. On December 13, 2001, the parties reached an agreement as to the amount of a settlement (subject to final documentation and judicial review and approval). On February 20, 2002, we reached a final settlement of the case and the court issued a Consent Decree setting forth the terms of the settlement. Pursuant to the settlement and Consent Decree: (i) we paid $500,000 on February 22, 2002; and $175,000 on January 7, 2003; (ii) we are required to pay $175,000 in January 2004, to satisfy the gender and race class claims; (iii) we paid an additional $75,000 on February 20, 2002 to one individual specifically named in the complaint; and (iv) we are required to spend at least $75,000 for our planned diversity, recruitment and human resource management programs over the term of the Consent Decree. We recorded a charge in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001 in the amount of $902,000 representing $575,000 payable upon entry of the Consent Decree, as well as $327,000 representing the present value at that date of the two equal payments in the amount of $175,000 payable in January 2003 and 2004. During the first quarter of 2003, we recorded accretion of the associated discount as interest expense in the amount of $3,000. The $75,000 used for our planned diversity, recruitment and human resource management programs is being expensed as incurred.

The Company, our former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Robert Kopstein, and two other officers and directors, Luke J. Huybrechts and Kenneth W. Harber, were named as defendants in a consolidated class action lawsuit pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia (the “Consolidated Suit”). The first class action lawsuit was filed on November 26, 2001, by Charles S. Farrell, Jr., on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The second class action lawsuit was filed on December 14, 2001, by Lerner Group, on behalf of itself and others similarly situated. The third class action lawsuit was filed on December 27, 2001, by Richard Simone, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The fourth class action lawsuit was filed on January 31, 2002 by Charles H. Yeatts, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. In each of the four suits, the defendants in the actions were the Company, Kopstein and various John Does (unidentified officers and/or directors of the Company during the class period described below). The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia appointed a group of shareholders as the lead plaintiffs for the Consolidated Suit. In the Consolidated Suit, the plaintiffs purported to represent purchasers of our common stock during the period ranging from June 14, 2000, through September 26, 2001 (the class period), and alleged that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20 of the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in making certain alleged misrepresentations and/or omitting to disclose material facts. The plaintiffs in the Consolidated Suit sought compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, as well as reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the cause of action, including attorneys’ fees and expert fees.

On June 26, 2002, we issued a press release announcing that we reached a tentative agreement to resolve the Consolidated Suit. The settlement provided for a cash payment of $700,000 and the issuance of warrants to purchase 250,000 shares (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split approved on July 30, 2002) of our common stock at an exercise price per share of $4.88 (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split).

18

Table of Contents

On July 22, 2002, the Court entered an Order of Preliminary Approval of the proposed settlement, and on September 23, 2002, the Court entered an Order and Final Judgment, approving the settlement and dismissing the Consolidated Suit with prejudice. The Order and Final Judgment was subject to appeal for 30 days after being entered. Since no appeal was filed with the Court within 30 days, the settlement became final and binding.

We paid $500,000 of the cash portion of the settlement upon preliminary court approval. The second and final installment, totaling $200,000, of the cash portion of the settlement was paid on November 1, 2002. The warrants will be exercisable for five years. We are in the process of registering the shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

We recorded a charge during fiscal year 2002 in the amount of $997,000 representing the estimated cost of the settlement and related professional fees incurred, net of insurance proceeds. Of the total amount expensed, approximately $320,000 represented the fair value of the warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.88 per share issued and to be issued in connection with the settlement of the shareholder litigation. Generally accepted accounting principles require the fair value to be adjusted at each reporting period until such time that the warrants are issued and the underlying shares of common stock to be issued on exercise are registered. Accordingly, we recognized additional related expense during the three months ended January 31, 2003 totaling $290,000 and we will continue to recognize related income or expense in future periods’ statements of operations until the previously noted requirements are met. Such recognized income or expense will be a non-cash item and have no impact on our net cash flow. The warrant expense portion of the accrued shareholder litigation settlement expense is calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model and, as of January 31, 2003, the closing price of our common stock of $3.22 per share on that day was used in that calculation. See “Item 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in Part 1 of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of the potential non-cash impact on future financial results.

On January 2, 2003, Anicom, Inc., a former customer of the Company that is in bankruptcy, filed a complaint against us in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (the “Complaint”). The Complaint seeks to avoid and recover certain alleged preferential payments in the approximate amount of $1,100,000. We have reviewed the claim with legal counsel and believe it is without merit. We intend to defend this claim vigorously. Furthermore, at this time we believe it is unlikely that this claim will have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

From time to time, we are involved in various other claims and legal actions arising in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, the ultimate disposition of these matters will not have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.

Seasonality

Historically, net sales are relatively lower in the first half of each fiscal year and relatively higher in the second half of each fiscal year, which we believe may be partially due to construction cycles and budgetary cycles of our customers. For example, an average of approximately 45% of our net sales occurred during the first half of the fiscal year and an average of approximately 55% of our net sales occurred during the second half of the fiscal year for fiscal years 1996 through 2000. However, our sales did not follow this pattern in fiscal year 2002 or 2001. In fiscal years 2002 and 2001, approximately 52% and 57% of our net sales occurred during the second half of the fiscal year, respectively. This shift in the pattern of our net sales appears to be related to overall economic conditions in the industry.

19

Table of Contents

Contractual Obligations and Commitments

The table below sets forth a summary of our contractual obligations and commitments that will impact our future liquidity:

Bank Lines of Credit

Under the terms of our loan agreement, as amended, our credit facility has a term of three years and will expire in April 2005. See further discussion under “Liquidity and Capital Resources.”

Long-Term Optical Fiber Supply Agreements

During fiscal year 2001, we entered into separate long-term supply agreements with two raw optical fiber suppliers.

The agreement with the first optical fiber supplier has been amended and replaced with a new agreement which expires on December 31, 2005. The aggregate purchases required under the terms of this amended and restated agreement (subject to certain future market price adjustments) are included in the table above. Additionally, this amended and restated agreement requires that one-half of the Company’s aggregate multimode fiber purchases and one-half of the Company’s aggregate single-mode fiber purchases through December 31, 2005 be purchased from that supplier at market prices.

The agreement with a second optical fiber supplier has also been amended. This amended supply agreement sets forth certain quantities to be purchased for calendar years 2003, 2004 and 2005. However, the amended supply agreement allows us to carry over the purchase commitment of any year to future years without penalty in the event the target quantities in any year are not met; provided that the aggregate amount of the purchase commitment under the amended supply agreement must be satisfied by December 31, 2005. The aggregate purchases under this second amended supply agreement (subject to certain future market price adjustments) are included in the table above assuming the purchase target quantities are met each year as set forth in the agreement.

Equal Employment Opportunity Commission Settlement

On September 27, 2000, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act against us in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The lawsuit alleged a pattern or practice of discrimination on the bases of gender and race. The lawsuit sought injunctive and other relief and damages in an unspecified amount. On December 13, 2001, the parties reached an agreement as to the amount of a settlement (subject to final documentation and judicial review and approval). On February 20, 2002, we reached a final settlement of the case and the court issued a Consent Decree setting forth the terms of the settlement. Pursuant to the settlement and Consent Decree: (i) we paid $500,000 on February 22, 2002; and $175,000 on January 7, 2003; (ii) we are required to pay $175,000 in January 2004, to satisfy the gender and race class claims; (iii) we paid an additional $75,000 on February 20, 2002 to one individual specifically named in the complaint; and (iv) we are required to spend at least $75,000 for our planned diversity, recruitment and human resource management programs over the term

20

Table of Contents

of the Consent Decree. We recorded a charge in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001 in the amount of $902,000 representing $575,000 payable upon entry of the Consent Decree, as well as $327,000 representing the present value at that date of the two equal payments in the amount of $175,000 payable in January 2003 and 2004. During the first quarter of 2003, we recorded accretion of the associated discount as interest expense in the amount of $3,000. The $75,000 used for our planned diversity, recruitment and human resource management programs is being expensed as incurred, and is not reflected in the Contractual Obligations and Commitments table above.

Critical Accounting Policies

Revenue Recognition

Revenue is recognized at the time of product shipment or delivery to the customer (including distributors), provided that the customer takes ownership and assumes risk of loss based on shipping terms. Net sales consists of gross sales of products, less discounts, refunds and returns. We estimate sales returns based on our analysis and judgment of historical trends, identified returns and the potential for additional returns. We also provide certain volume incentives, discounts and rebates to certain of our distributors. Payments of any such volume incentives, discounts and rebates are reflected in net sales.

Trade Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts

In connection with the sale of our products, we have trade accounts receivable outstanding from our customers at any given time. We review outstanding trade accounts receivable at the end of each quarter and record allowances for doubtful accounts as deemed appropriate for (i) certain individual customers and (ii) for all other trade accounts receivable in total not specifically reviewed. In determining the amount of allowance for doubtful accounts to be recorded for individual customers, we consider the age of the receivable, the financial stability of the customer, discussions that may have occurred with the customer and our judgment as to the overall collectibility of the receivable from that customer. In addition, we establish an allowance for all receivables that have not been individually reviewed. This general allowance for doubtful accounts is based on a percentage of total trade accounts receivable with different percentages used based on the different age of the receivables. The percentages used are based on our historical experience and our current judgment regarding the state of the economy.

Inventories

Inventories of raw materials and production supplies are stated at the lower of cost (specific identification for optical fibers and first-in, first-out for other raw materials and production supplies) or market. Inventories of work in process and finished goods are stated at average cost, which includes raw materials, direct labor and manufacturing overhead. At the end of each quarter, we review our inventories to ensure they are carried at no more than net realizable value. Individual inventory items are viewed and adjustments are made based on the age of the inventory and our judgment as to the salability of that inventory.

Long-Lived Assets

Our property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided for using either the straight-line method or the declining balance method over the estimated useful lives of the assets. We review long-lived assets for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. We have no significant intangible assets recorded on our condensed balance sheets.

21

Table of Contents

Commitments and Contingencies

Liabilities for loss contingencies arising from product warranties and defects, claims, assessments, litigation, fines and penalties and other sources are recorded when it is probable that a liability has been incurred and the amount of the assessment can be reasonably estimated. Actual results could differ from these estimates.

Future Accounting Considerations

In December 2002, the FASB issued SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation – Transition and Disclosure, an amendment of FASB Statement No. 123, to provide alternative methods of transition for a voluntary change to the fair value based method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation. In addition, SFAS No. 148 amends the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 123 to require prominent disclosures in both annual and interim financial statements about the method of accounting for stock-based employee compensation and the effect of the method used on reported results. The application of the transition provisions of SFAS No. 148 is effective for fiscal years ending after December 15, 2002. The application of the disclosure requirements is effective for financial reports for interim periods beginning after December 15, 2002. We are currently evaluating the impact of SFAS No. 148.

As of January 31, 2003, there are no other new accounting standards issued, but not yet adopted by us, which are expected to be applicable to our financial position, operating results or financial statement disclosures.

22

Table of Contents

Item 3.      Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

We do not engage in transactions in derivative financial instruments or derivative commodity instruments. As of January 31, 2003, our financial instruments were not exposed to significant market risk due to interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange risk, commodity price risk or equity price risk, with the exception of the portion of accrued shareholder litigation settlement expense that represents the fair market value of the warrants issued and to be issued in connection with the settlement. As of January 31, 2003, the portion of accrued shareholder litigation settlement expense that represents the fair market value is calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model. Assuming a 20% increase in the market price of our common shares, we estimate the portion of accrued shareholder litigation settlement expense that represents the fair market value of the warrants issued and to be issued in connection with the settlement would increase approximately $164,000, or 27%. Assuming a 20% decrease in the market price of our common shares, we estimate the portion of accrued shareholder litigation settlement expense that represents the fair market value of the warrants issued and to be issued in connection with the settlement would decrease approximately $142,000, or 23%.

Item 4.      Controls and Procedures

The Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer are the same person. He has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-14(c) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, within 90 days of the filing date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based upon his evaluation, the principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective. There were no significant changes in the Company’s internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect these controls, since the date the controls were evaluated.

23

Table of Contents

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.    Legal Proceedings.

On September 27, 2000, the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (“EEOC”) filed a lawsuit under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act against us in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia. The lawsuit alleged a pattern or practice of discrimination on the bases of gender and race. The lawsuit sought injunctive and other relief and damages in an unspecified amount. On December 13, 2001, the parties reached an agreement as to the amount of a settlement (subject to final documentation and judicial review and approval). On February 20, 2002, we reached a final settlement of the case and the court issued a Consent Decree setting forth the terms of the settlement. Pursuant to the settlement and Consent Decree: (i) we paid $500,000 on February 22, 2002; and $175,000 on January 7, 2003; (ii) we are required to pay $175,000 in January 2004, to satisfy the gender and race class claims; (iii) we paid an additional $75,000 on February 20, 2002 to one individual specifically named in the complaint; and (iv) we are required to spend at least $75,000 for our planned diversity, recruitment and human resource management programs over the term of the Consent Decree. We recorded a charge in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2001 in the amount of $902,000 representing $575,000 payable upon entry of the Consent Decree, as well as $327,000 representing the present value at that date of the two equal payments in the amount of $175,000 payable in January 2003 and 2004. During the first quarter of 2003, we recorded accretion of the associated discount as interest expense in the amount of $3,000. The $75,000 used for our planned diversity, recruitment and human resource management programs is being expensed as incurred.

The Company, our former Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer Robert Kopstein, and two other officers and directors, Luke J. Huybrechts and Kenneth W. Harber, were named as defendants in a consolidated class action lawsuit pending in the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia (the “Consolidated Suit”). The first class action lawsuit was filed on November 26, 2001, by Charles S. Farrell, Jr., on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The second class action lawsuit was filed on December 14, 2001, by Lerner Group, on behalf of itself and others similarly situated. The third class action lawsuit was filed on December 27, 2001, by Richard Simone, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. The fourth class action lawsuit was filed on January 31, 2002 by Charles H. Yeatts, on behalf of himself and others similarly situated. In each of the four suits, the defendants in the actions were the Company, Kopstein and various John Does (unidentified officers and/or directors of the Company during the class period described below). The United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia appointed a group of shareholders as the lead plaintiffs for the Consolidated Suit. In the Consolidated Suit, the plaintiffs purported to represent purchasers of our common stock during the period ranging from June 14, 2000, through September 26, 2001 (the class period), and alleged that the defendants violated Sections 10(b) and 20 of the federal Securities Exchange Act of 1934 in making certain alleged misrepresentations and/or omitting to disclose material facts. The plaintiffs in the Consolidated Suit sought compensatory damages in an unspecified amount, as well as reasonable costs and expenses incurred in the cause of action, including attorneys’ fees and expert fees.

On June 26, 2002, we issued a press release announcing that we reached a tentative agreement to resolve the Consolidated Suit. The settlement provided for a cash payment of $700,000 and the issuance of warrants to purchase 250,000 shares (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split approved on July 30, 2002) of our common stock at an exercise price per share of $4.88 (adjusted for the 1-for-8 reverse stock split).

24

Table of Contents

On July 22, 2002, the Court entered an Order of Preliminary Approval of the proposed settlement, and on September 23, 2002, the Court entered an Order and Final Judgment, approving the settlement and dismissing the Consolidated Suit with prejudice. The Order and Final Judgment was subject to appeal for 30 days after being entered. Since no appeal was filed with the Court within 30 days, the settlement became final and binding.

We paid $500,000 of the cash portion of the settlement upon preliminary court approval. The second and final installment, totaling $200,000, of the cash portion of the settlement was paid on November 1, 2002. The warrants will be exercisable for five years. We are in the process of registering the shares issuable upon the exercise of the warrants under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

We recorded a charge during fiscal year 2002 in the amount of $997,000 representing the estimated cost of the settlement and related professional fees incurred, net of insurance proceeds. Of the total amount expensed, approximately $320,000 represented the fair value of the warrants to purchase 250,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $4.88 per share issued and to be issued in connection with the settlement of the shareholder litigation. Generally accepted accounting principles require the fair value to be adjusted at each reporting period until such time that the warrants are issued and the underlying shares of common stock to be issued on exercise are registered. Accordingly, we recognized additional related expense during the three months ended January 31, 2003 totaling $290,000 and we will continue to recognize related income or expense in future periods’ statements of operations until the previously noted requirements are met. Such recognized income or expense will be a non-cash item and have no impact on our net cash flow. The warrant expense portion of the accrued shareholder litigation settlement expense is calculated using the Black-Scholes pricing model and, as of January 31, 2003, the closing price of our common stock of $3.22 per share on that day was used in that calculation. See “Item 3—Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” in Part 1 of this Form 10-Q for a discussion of the potential non-cash impact on future financial results.

On January 2, 2003, Anicom, Inc., a former customer of the Company that is in bankruptcy, filed a complaint against us in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division (the “Complaint”). The Complaint seeks to avoid and recover certain alleged preferential payments in the approximate amount of $1,100,000. We have reviewed the claim with legal counsel and believe it is without merit. We intend to defend this claim vigorously. Furthermore, at this time we believe it is unlikely that this claim will have a material adverse impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows.

Item 2.    Changes in Securities and Use of Proceeds.

On February 11, 2002, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3. The shares offered by the prospectus are issuable upon exercise of common share purchase warrants to be issued to class members pursuant to a settlement agreement among Optical Cable Corporation, some of our current and former officers and directors and plaintiffs’ counsel that was approved by the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia on September 23, 2002, relating to a consolidated class action law suit filed against Optical Cable and some of our current and former officers and directors. Optical Cable will sell the common shares to class members upon exercise of the warrants as at an exercise price of $4.88 per common share. If all of the warrants are exercised, Optical Cable would receive aggregate cash proceeds of $1,220,000. However, holders of warrants may not exercise some or all of the warrants.

25

Table of Contents

Item 6.    Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K.

26

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

27

Table of Contents

CERTIFICATION

I, Neil D. Wilkin, Jr., certify that:

Date: March 17, 2003

/s/NEIL D. WILKIN, JR.                                    

Neil D. Wilkin, Jr.

President (principal executive officer) and  
Chief Financial Officer

28