OPTILEAF, INC. - Annual Report: 2018 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

(Mark One)

☒ ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018

☐ TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ___________ to ___________

Commission File No. 333-169802

OptiLeaf, Inc.

 (Name of small business issuer in its charter)

(855) 678-4532

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act:

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act:

Common Stock, no par value

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ☐     No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ☐     No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files. Yes ☒     No ☐ 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes ☒     No ☐ 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ☐     No ☒

The aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, ended June 30, 2020, was $1,253,735.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

OptiLeaf was incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on August 11, 2014. OptiLeaf, Inc. was formed to provide a world-class fully integrated turn-key growth management system for the cannabis industry to help dispensary owners, grow operations and caregivers increase their sales and reduce costs, increase their company’s productivity and profitability and reduce or eliminate the need for manual labor while maximizing yield. OptiLeaf’s target market includes dispensaries and grow operations.

Our Product

OptiLeaf has completed the development of its growth management “GrowPro” and point-of- sale “POS” software. These software offerings are the next generation POS and growth management systems that provide a complete solution for cultivation operations, processing and manufacturing, and dispensaries in the legal medical and recreational cannabis industry. Moreover, OptiLeaf has completed its “Store Manager” software and it’s currently in beta test. This back-end software allows store owners and managers to take command and streamline their business in real-time. The main features are: Customized dashboard, sales trends, best-selling brands and products, top selling budtenders, sales trend, analytic and detail mission critical reporting.

Our POS software works with almost all POS hardware and uses devices that dispensary owners already have. Our powerful custom reports enable dispensary owners and managers to make informed decisions on how to increase profit and reduce operational costs while keeping them in compliant with the state. Our system prevents any sale from exceeding state regulations, automatically verify the customers’ age and their purchase limits, print compliant labels and receipts, and digitally file all patient records and reports.

Our GrowPro growth management software allows cultivators to track with real-time data of their plant’ history including genealogy, events, growth stages, watering and nutrient cycles, yields, harvesting, and every aspect of the grow operations.

Both products have complete integration with Metrc™ (state traceability system) for the State of Colorado, Oregon, and Michigan. This will allow growers and dispensary owners from having to do double entry and manually reporting sales and cultivation data to the state. Sales and cultivation data are automatically downloaded and synced accurately with state traceability systems.

Marketing

OptiLeaf focus its sales and marketing efforts in the states of Colorado, Oregon and Washington at this point. We are planning on expanding our marketing into California and Michigan. We have decided to focus our efforts with the most developed and broadest customer base at this point.

OptiLeaf has opened a sales office in Denver, CO. We believe that having a local presence will help accelerate sales and provide better customer service and support. In addition, having a local market presence helps us gain a better understanding of the needs of our customers as well as challenges and opportunities in the market.

Operations

OptiLeaf’s operational strategies behind the development of our products and services are based on design, innovation, and added value. When developing a new product, we want to be the leader by introducing innovative features that will allow cannabis cultivators to lower their costs, boost yields, and maximize production capacity. Furthermore, when OptiLeaf develops new goods or services, we will package them with support services as well as immediate observable and psychological benefits. Our focus is on how our products and services stand against the competition and how our technical measures relate to the customers’ needs.

Our primary operation strategy is to focus on quality and service. Our products must meet our eight dimensions of quality: performance, conformance, features, durability, reliability, serviceability, aesthetics, and perceived quality. Based on our operational strategies, we believe OptiLeaf’s products and services will be superior to the competition. We recognize that there are some limitations imposed by trade-offs that must be made due to the nature of the product. For example, reliability may be sacrificed in order to achieve maximum speed.

Fundraising

OptiLeaf is in the process of preparing for an additional capital raise. This capital will be used to build out a sales and marketing force, for further development of its products and technologies, for hiring of additional personnel and for general working capital. The Company has not received any commitments for additional capital at this point, and there can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise the capital it seeks or can do so on terms satisfactory to the Company.

Staffing

As of December 31, 2018, we have 3 full time employees. The number of employees will be determined by the projected number of customers and that will need to be attended to.

Suppliers

OptiLeaf relies on overseas manufacturers to supply various components of its product line. The most important benefit of using this type of supplier is that we are able to remain cost competitive in our local market. We believe that this will give us a competitive advantage that can be used to increase the sales and profits of our business.

We plan on buying most of our inventory directly from the manufacturer. Because we generally will be placing large orders, dealing directly with the manufacturer will yield the lowest cost per unit. The down side of working with these large manufacturers is that we are not able to order in smaller quantities, resulting in having a considerable sum of money tied up in each order. When a smaller quantity of product is necessary, we will use a smaller business-to-business manufacturer.

These manufacturers will require 30 days advance notice for each order. Shipments from China typically take 7-10 days for delivery by air or 20-30 days by ocean freighter.

Customer Service and Support

Timely order fulfillment is crucial to customer satisfaction. OptiLeaf will hire additional assistants as needed to monitor and manage the delivery, billing, warranty service and repair of its products. This helps to ensure customer satisfaction and repeat sales.

To improve operating efficiency, we plan to use Amazon.com as our order fulfillment company. Their facilities are “state-of-the-art” and their customer satisfaction record is unsurpassed. By outsourcing this function, we can keep internal staffing needs at a minimum and avoid having to expand our telephone network and computer systems. We will also save on shipping costs due to the high-volume discounts Amazon.com earns by serving multiple businesses from one location.

Our customers emphasize that good service and after-sales support are among their major concerns. A hot-line service is available to all registered customers enrolled in OptiLeaf’s maintenance / support program.

Customer satisfaction will be a high priority for OptiLeaf. Our main goal is to ensure that our products are made using the highest quality components so that there are few, if any, returns due to product defects. Still, we recognize the fact that however good our product is, there will be times when it simply does not meet the needs of some customers. To ensure a positive experience and image in the minds of these and all customers, we will offer a money-back guarantee. Our objective is to make our customer service so satisfying that even if a customer decides to return a particular product, we will retain that person as a loyal customer, who won’t hesitate to refer friends and associates, and perhaps make other purchases from OptiLeaf in the future.

Subcontractors

In order to control our expenses, OptiLeaf is currently subcontracting a portion of our advertising and marketing to third parties. This will potentially allow us to bring in professionals with expertise that we have not yet acquired.

Government Regulation

OptiLeaf does not directly distribute, sell, grow, harvest cannabis or any substances that violate United States law or the Controlled Substances Act, nor does it intend to do so in the future. We are a technology provider to the cannabis industry. As such, we are operating within an industry that is very complex in terms of legal requirements and compliance. Cannabis is an illegal drug under Federal Law and is illegal in many states as well. Certain states have made cannabis legal for medicinal use only, but in very few circumstances is it legal to possess or sell cannabis. Although we plan on being a technology provider only, and do not plan of growing, selling or possessing any cannabis, we nevertheless must comply with, and our business must comply with, a myriad of state and local laws and regulations regarding our operations, and our operations, as well as our profitability, can be significantly affected by all of these laws and how they affect the businesses or our customers.

In addition, we are subject to a number of laws and regulations that affect companies generally and specifically those conducting business on the internet, many of which are still evolving and could be interpreted in ways that could harm our business. Existing and future laws and regulations may impede our growth. These regulations and laws may cover online marketing, e-mail marketing, telemarketing, taxation, privacy, data protection, pricing, content, copyrights, distribution, mobile communications, electronic contracts and other communications, consumer protection, web services, the provision of online payment services, unencumbered internet access to our services, the design and operation of websites, and the characteristics and quality of products and services. It is not clear how existing laws governing issues such as property ownership, libel, and personal privacy apply to the internet, e-commerce, digital content and web services. Unfavorable regulations and laws could diminish the demand for our products and services and increase our cost of doing business.

Litigation

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

The Company has consolidated its operations and has eliminated its two previous leases in favor of one lease, in a property owned by two related persons, that was supposed to commence on August 10, 2018, at a monthly payment of $2,000 plus the Company’s pro rata share of operating expenses. The monthly rental and operating cost payments have not been made and the parties agreed to rescind it.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings, which arise, in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business. We are currently not aware of any such legal proceedings or claims that we believe will have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or operating results.

Not applicable.

PART II

Market Information

Our common stock has been approved for trading on the Over the Counter (OTC) Markets under the symbol OPLF since March 15, 2016. The OTC Markets is a quotation service that displays real-time quotes, last-sale prices, and volume information in over the counter, or the OTC, equity securities.

Price range of common stock

The following table shows, for the periods indicated, the high and low bid prices per share of our common stock as reported by the OTC Markets quotation service. The quotations reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions, and may not represent actual transactions.

N/A – Our stock has not been actively quoted with a bid/ask as of this filing.

Holders

As of December 31, 2018, we had 28 shareholders of our common stock.

Transfer Agent and Registrar

ClearTrust, LLC is currently the transfer agent and registrar for our common stock. Its address is 16540 Pointe Village Dr., Suite 206, Lutz, FL 33558. Its phone number is (813) 235-4490.

Authorized Capital Stock

Our authorized stock consists of 100,000,000 shares of common stock, with no par value. There are currently 20,777,086 shares of common stock issued and outstanding, as of December 31, 2018.

Common Stock

Each share of our common stock entitles its holder to one vote in the election of each director and on all other matters voted on generally by our stockholders, other than any matter that (1) solely relates to the terms of any outstanding series of common stock or the number of shares of that series and (2) does not affect the number of authorized shares of common stock or the powers, privileges and rights pertaining to the common stock. No share of our common stock affords any cumulative voting rights. This means that the holders of a majority of the voting power of the shares voting for the election of directors can elect all directors to be elected if they choose to do so.

Holders of our common stock will be entitled to dividends in such amounts and at such times as our Board of Directors in its discretion may declare out of funds legally available for the payment of dividends. We currently intend to retain our entire available discretionary cash flow to finance the growth, development and expansion of our business and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on the common stock in the foreseeable future. Any future dividends will be paid at the discretion of our Board of Directors after taking into account various factors, including:

If we liquidate or dissolve our business, the holders of our common stock will share ratably in all our assets that are available for distribution to our stockholders after our creditors are paid in full and the holders of all series of our outstanding common stock, if any, receive their liquidation preferences in full.

Our common stock has no preemptive rights and is not convertible or redeemable or entitled to the benefits of any sinking or repurchase fund.

Dividends

Since inception we have not paid any dividends on our common stock. We currently do not anticipate paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future on our common stock, when issued pursuant to this offering. Although we intend to retain our earnings, if any, to finance the exploration and growth of our business, our Board of Directors will have the discretion to declare and pay dividends in the future. Payment of dividends in the future will depend upon our earnings, capital requirements, and other factors, which our Board of Directors may deem relevant.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

We presently do not have any equity based or other long-term incentive programs. In the future, we may adopt and establish an equity-based or other long-term incentive plan if it is in the best interest of the Company and our shareholders to do so.

We are a smaller reporting company as defined by Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act and are not required to provide the information under this item.

The information and financial data discussed below is derived from our audited financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2018. The audited financial statements were prepared and presented in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States. The information and financial data discussed below is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with the related notes contained elsewhere in this prospectus. The financial statements contained elsewhere in this prospectus fully represent our financial condition and operations; however, they are not indicative of our future performance.

Overview

We were incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida on August 11, 2014. OptiLeaf, Inc. was formed to provide a world-class fully integrated turn-key growth management system for the cannabis industry to help dispensary owners, grow operations and caregivers increase their sales and reduce costs, increase their company’s productivity and profitability and reduce or eliminate the need for manual labor while maximizing yield. OptiLeaf’s target market includes dispensaries and grow operations.

Through December 31, 2018 our cumulative deficit was $856, 483 compared to a cumulative net loss as of December 31, 2017 of $699,759. On December 31, 2018 we had total current assets of $13,590 and total current liabilities of $29,028 compared to total current assets of $27,744 and total current liabilities of $24,902 on December 31, 2017.

Recent Developments

OptiLeaf has completed the development of its growth management “GrowPro” and point-of- sale “POS” software. These software are the next generation POS and growth management systems that provide a complete solution for cultivation operations, processing and manufacturing, and dispensaries in the legal medical and recreational cannabis industry. Moreover, OptiLeaf has completed its “Store Manager” software and it’s currently in beta test. This back-end software allows store owners and managers to take command and streamline their business in real-time. The main features are: Customized dashboard, sales trends, best-selling brands and products, top selling bartenders, sales trend, analytic and detail mission critical reporting.

Our POS software works with almost all POS hardware and uses devices that dispensary owners already have. Our powerful custom reports enable dispensary owners and managers to make informed decisions on how to increase profit and reduce operational costs while keeping them in compliant with the state. Our system prevents any sale from exceeding state regulations, automatically verify the customers’ age and their purchase limits print compliant labels and receipts, and digitally file all patient records and reports.

Our GrowPro growth management software allows cultivators to track with real-time data of their plant’ history including genealogy, events, growth stages, watering and nutrient cycles, yields, harvesting, and every aspect of the grow operations.

Both products have complete integration with Metrc™ (state traceability system) for the State of Colorado and Oregon. This will allow growers and dispensary owners from having to do double entry and manually reporting sales and cultivation data to the state. Sales and cultivation data are automatically downloaded and synced accurately with state traceability systems.

Plan of Operation

OptiLeaf plans to partner with popular online live menu providers, CRM, and credit card payment systems to offer credit card and debit card acceptant and to provide real time online inventory and pricing data.

For the year of 2019, the Company plans to hire more staff, build brand awareness and increase sales, plus the following:

Results of Operations

Because we are in a developmental stage and have been conducting development operations our revenue has been minimal. We generated revenue of $47, 697 during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $26,749 during the year ended December 31, 2017. Cost of sales increased to $10,810 for the year ended December 31, 2018, compared to $7,944 for the year ended December 31, 2017. During those same periods, we had gross margins of $36,887 or 77% of sales compared to $18,805 or 70% of sales, for the year ended December 31, 2017. During those same time periods operating expenses decreased to $192,468 from $225,278 resulting in a net loss for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2018 of $155,581 compared to a net loss of $206,473 for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2017. The decrease in net loss was due primarily to a reduction in professional fees and payroll, and a general reduction in other overhead items.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

As of December 31, 2018, we had cash of $11,290, compared to $17,197 as of December 31, 2017. Our primary uses of cash were for employee compensation and working capital. The main sources of cash were from our founders, investors, and from licensing of our software suite. The following trends are reasonably likely to result in a material decrease in our liquidity over the near to long term:

As the Company has experienced a decrease in its available capital during each of the past 3 fiscal years, and we expect this trend to continue in the current year, the Company will likely need to raise additional capital in the current fiscal year to continue to finance its business plans and activities. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to raise such capital, or on such terms as our acceptable to management. If the Company fails to raise additional capital, the Company could be unable to execute on its business plans.

We are not required to provide the information required by this Item because we are a smaller reporting company.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

AUDIT REPORT

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and
Shareholders’ of Optileaf, Incorporated.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Optileaf, Incorporated. (the Company) as of December 31, 2018 and the related statement of operations, shareholders’ deficit and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2018, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2018 and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2018, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Explanatory Paragraph- Going Concern

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company has suffered recurring losses and for the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company had a net loss of $156,679, had net cash used in operating activities of $140,907, and had negative working capital of $15,438. These factors raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audit included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audit also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audit provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

ASSURANCE DIMENSIONS CERTIFIED PUBLIC ACCOUNTANTS & ASSOCIATES

also d/b/a McNAMARA and ASSOCIATES, PLLC

TAMPA BAY: 4920 W Cypress Street, Suite 102 | Tampa, FL 33607 | Office: 813.443.5048 | Fax: 813.443.5053

JACKSONVILLE: 4720 Salisbury Road, Suite 223 | Jacksonville, FL 32256 | Office: 888.410.2323 | Fax: 813.443.5053

ORLANDO:  1800 Pembrook Drive, Suite 300 | Orlando, FL 32810 | Office: 888.410.2323 | Fax: 813.443.5053

SOUTH FLORIDA:  2000 Banks Road, Suite 218 | Margate, FL 33063 | Office: 754.800.3400 | Fax: 813.443.5053

www.assurancedimensions.com 

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of OptiLeaf, Inc.

Opinion on the Financial Statements

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of OptiLeaf, Inc. (the Company) as of December 31, 2017, and the related statements of operations, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, and the related notes (collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2017, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the year ended December 31, 2017, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Going Concern

The accompanying financials have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As of December 31, 2017, the Company had accumulated losses of approximately $700,000, has approximately $3,000 of working capital and has generated limited revenues, and may experiences losses in the near term. These factors and the need for additional financing in order for the Company to meet its business plan, raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. Management's plan to continue as a going concern is also described in Note 2. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

Basis for Opinion

These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audits, we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.

Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

We have served as the Company’s auditor since 2015.

/s/ Soles, Heyn & Company, LLP

Soles, Heyn & Company, LLP

West Palm Beach, Florida

April 27, 2018

400 Executive Center Drive, Suite 203
West Palm Beach, FL 33401

561-429-6625

OptiLeaf Incorporated

Balance Sheets

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

OptiLeaf Incorporated

Statements of Operations

See accompanying notes to financial statements.

OptiLeaf Incorporated

Statement of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)

For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

See accompanying notes to financial statements

OptiLeaf Incorporated

Statements of Cash Flows

See accompanying notes to financial statements

OptiLeaf, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Note 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization

OptiLeaf Incorporated (“OptiLeaf” or the “Company”) was incorporated in Florida in August 2014. The Company has been in the development stage since inception and has generated minimal sales to date. The Company plans to develop, market and sell integrated software and hardware to the agriculture industry for the seamless tracking and management of growth, task automation and sale of their clients’ products.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. At December 31, 2018, the Company had no cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

The Company has $2,300 and $6,150 of trade accounts receivable at December 31, 2018 and 2017. The Company reviews the accounts receivable, at least quarterly, and, if appropriate, records an allowance for doubtful accounts. No allowance was required as of December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Inventory

The Company maintains a minimal inventory, at cost, to provide its clients with the necessary hardware required to avail themselves of the internet service.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation is expensed over the estimated useful lives (3 years) of the related assets using the straight-line depreciation method.

Maintenance and repairs are charged to operations when incurred. Betterments and improvements are capitalized. When property and equipment are sold or otherwise disposed of, the asset account and related accumulated depreciation account are reduced, and any gain or loss is included in other income (expense) in the Statement of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Capitalized Software Development Costs

Software development costs are expensed as incurred until technological feasibility of the product is established. Development costs incurred subsequent to technological feasibility will be capitalized and amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated economic life of the product. Capitalization of computer software costs will be discontinued when the computer software product is available to be sold, leased, or otherwise marketed. Amortization will begin when the product is available for release to customers. Management has determined as of December 31, 2018 that the software has not yet reached the stage of technological feasibility. The Company has not maintained specific cost records, but estimates that $107,000 and $112,500 has been expensed for software development and is included in payroll expense for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017 respectively.

Revenue Recognition

Effective January 1, 2018, the Company adopted Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606) (“ASC 606”). The new guidance sets forth a new five-step revenue recognition model which replaces the prior revenue recognition guidance in its entirety and is intended to eliminate numerous industry-specific pieces of revenue recognition guidance that have historically existed in US GAAP. The underlying principle of the new standard is that a business or other organization will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects to receive in exchange for the goods or services. The standard also requires more detailed disclosures and provides additional guidance for transactions that were not addressed completely in the prior accounting guidance. The Company adopted ASC 606 using the modified retrospective method, which did not have an impact on its financial statements. The Company recognizes revenue from product sales or services rendered when the following five revenue recognition criteria are met: identify the contract with the client, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract and recognize revenues when or as the Company satisfies a performance obligation.

OptiLeaf, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

The Company receives payments from individual clients. As the period between the time of service and time of payment is typically less than 30 days, the Company elected the practical expedient under ASC 606-10-32-18 and does not adjust for the effects of a significant financing component. Revenue is recognized at the point of time at the conclusion of when services are performed for individual clients and all performance obligations have been met.

The Company recognizes revenue from product sales or services rendered when the five revenue recognition criteria are met: identify the contract with the client, identify the performance obligations in the contract, determine the transaction price, allocate the transaction price to performance obligations in the contract and recognize revenues when or as the Company satisfies a performance obligation.

Research and Development

The cost of research and development is charged to expense when incurred.

Net Loss per Common Share

Basic net (loss) income per common share is calculated using the weighted average common shares outstanding during each reporting period. Diluted net (loss) income per common share adjusts the weighted average common shares for the potential dilution that could occur if common stock equivalents (convertible debt and preferred stock, warrants, and stock options) were exercised or converted into common stock. There were no common stock equivalents at December 31, 2018 and 2017.

Income Taxes

Deferred income taxes are recognized for the tax consequences related to temporary differences between the carrying amount of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and the amounts used for tax purposes at each year end, based on enacted tax laws and statutory tax rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is recognized when, based on the weight of all available evidence, it is considered more likely than not that all, or some portion, of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Income tax expense is the sum of current income tax plus the change in deferred tax assets and liabilities.

ASC 740, Income Taxes, requires a company to first determine whether it is more likely than not (which is defined as a likelihood of more than fifty percent) that a tax position will be sustained based on its technical merits as of the reporting date, assuming that taxing authorities will examine the position and have full knowledge of all relevant information. A tax position that meets this more likely than not threshold is then measured and recognized at the largest amount of benefit that is greater than fifty percent likely to be realized upon effective settlement with a taxing authority.

The Federal and state income tax returns of the Company for 2018, 2017 and 2016 are subject to examination by the internal Revenue Service and state taxing authorities for three (3) years from the date filed. The Company has filed returns through to 2018.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Company follows ASC 718 - 10, Stock Compensation, which addresses the accounting for transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity instruments for goods or services, with a primary focus on transactions in which an entity obtains employee services in share-based payment transactions. ASC 718 - 10 requires measurement of the cost of employee services received in exchange for an award of equity instruments based on the grant - date fair value of the award (with limited exceptions). Incremental compensation costs arising from subsequent modifications of awards after the grant date must be recognized. The Company has not adopted a stock option plan and has not granted any stock options; nor has it made any awards of stock, or stock equivalents.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments and Fair Value Measurements

ASC 820, “Fair Value Measurements”, requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. It establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. It prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

OptiLeaf, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model - derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash equivalents, accounts payable, loans payable, and amounts due to related parties. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash equivalents is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that OptiLeaf, Inc. Notes to Financial statements As of December 31, 2018 the recorded values of all of our financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02 Leases (Topic 842) (“ASU 2016-02”), which requires all leases with a term greater than 12 months to be recognized on the balance sheet, while lease expenses would continue to be recognized in the statement of operations in a manner similar to current accounting guidance. We will make an accounting policy election that will keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off of the balance sheet and will result in recognizing those lease payments in our consolidated statements of operations on a straight-line basis over the lease term. The new standard establishes a right-of-use model (ROU) asset and lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with a term longer than 12 months. Leases will be classified as finance or operating, with classification affecting the pattern and classification of expense recognition in the statement of operations. ASU 2016-02 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2019. We anticipate adopting ASU 2016-02 on a modified retrospective basis effective January 1, 2019, without adjusting comparative periods presented. The Company does not have any leases which meet the criteria.

Other recent accounting pronouncements issued by the FASB, including its Emerging Issues Task Force, the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants, and the Securities and Exchange Commission did not or are not believed by management to have a material impact on the Company’s present or future financial statements.

Note 2. GOING CONCERN

The Company’s financial statements are presented on a going concern basis, which contemplates the realization of assets and satisfaction of liabilities in the normal course of business.

The Company has experienced losses, from operations, during its development stage, as a result of the investment necessary to achieve its operating plan, which is long-range in nature. For the period from inception through December 31, 2018, the Company incurred accumulated losses of $856,438, compared to a cumulative loss through December 31, 2017, of $699,759. For the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company sustained a loss of $156,679 and had negative working capital of $15,438 compared to a loss of $206,433 and working capital of $2,842 for the year ended December 31, 2017. In addition, the Company has minimal revenue generating from operations. These conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern for a period of twelve months from the issuance of this report. These financial statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts, or amounts and classification of liabilities that might result from this uncertainty.

During the year ended December 31, 2018 the Company used $140,907 for operating expenses compared to $212,581 during the year ended December 31, 2017. The Company generated $50,000 from the sale of common stock, $40,000 from the issuance of notes payable and $45,000 from related parties, during the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to $35,000 from the sale of stock during the year ended December 31, 2017.

OptiLeaf, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

The ability of the Company to continue as a going concern is in doubt and is dependent upon achieving a profitable level of operations or on the ability of the Company to obtain necessary financing to fund ongoing operations.

To meet these objectives, the Company continues to seek other sources of financing in order to support existing operations and expand the range and scope of its business. However, there are no assurances that any such financing can be obtained on acceptable terms and timely manner, if at all. The failure to obtain the necessary working capital would have a material adverse effect on the business prospects and, depending upon the shortfall, the Company may have to curtail or cease its operations.

The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustment to the recorded assets or liabilities that might be necessary should the Company have to curtail operations or be unable to continue in existence.

Note 3. COMPUTER EQUIPMENT

Equipment is recorded at cost and consisted of the following at December 31, 2018 and 2017:

Depreciation expense was $0 and $2,660 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively.

Note 4. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

During the year ended December 31, 2018, two related party shareholders made unsecured loans, to the Company, totaling $45,000, maturing on April 1, 2020, bearing interest of 3%. See subsequent events, note 9.

During the year ended December 31, 2018, a related party purchased, from the company, $7,000 worth of services, which were paid for on December 14, 2018.

Note 5. STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

Common stock

The Company has authorized 100,000,000 shares of no par value common stock. At December 31, 2018 and 2017, the number of shares of common stock issued was 20,777,086 and 20,443,752 respectively.

On September 14, 2017, the Company issued, for cash, to an investor, 233,333 restricted common shares for $35,000, recorded at a cost of $0.15 per share.

On July 25, 2018, the Company issued, for cash, to two investors, 333,334 restricted common shares for a total of $50,000, recorded at a cost of $0.15 per share.

Treasury stock

On September 20, 2016, the Board of Directors authorized the Company to repurchase one million shares of common stock for $40,000. These treasury stock shares may, at any time, be canceled upon the Board of Directors approval. The Board has not made such election. See subsequent event note 9.

Note 6. CONCENTRATION CREDIT RISK

At December 31, 2018 the Company had two non – related customers that owed 58.5% and 41.5% of total accounts receivable, compared to December 31, 2017 when four non – related customers owed 47.8%, 39.1%, 13% and 17.2%.

The Company maintains its cash balances in a local financial institution which at times may exceed the $250,000 amount insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC). On December 31, 2018 and 2017the Company did not have cash balances which would exceed the limit.

OptiLeaf, Inc.
Notes to Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2018 and 2017

Note 7. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

On August 10, 2018 the Company leased its offices for six years, payable at the rate of $2,000 per month, plus the Company’s pro rata share of operating expenses. No payment was made. The lease was subsequently cancelled and rescinded.

Note 8. INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes under the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) No. 740, Income Taxes (“ASC 740”). Under ASC 740, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled.

The Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 changed the top corporate tax rate from 35% to one rate of 21%. This rate will be effective for corporations whose tax year begins after January 1, 2018, and it is a permanent change. Under ASC 740, the effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. The resulting amendments to IRC Section 172 disallow the carryback of net operating losses but allow for the indefinite carryforward of those net operating losses. Pursuant to Section 172(e)(2) of the statute, the amended carryback and carryover rules apply to any net operating loss arising in a taxable year ending after December 31, 2017. In addition to the carryover and carryback changes, the Act also introduces a limitation on the amount of net operating losses that a corporation may deduct in a single tax year under section 172(a) equal to the lesser of the available net operating loss carryover or 80 percent of a taxpayer’s pre-NOL deduction taxable income (the “80-percent limitation”). This limitation applies only to losses arising in tax years that begin after December 31, 2017 based upon section 172(e) (1) of the amended statute.

The new tax bill reduced the federal income tax rate for corporations from 35% to 21%.

At December 31, 2018, the Company has a net operating loss carryforward of approximately $856,438 for Federal and state purposes. This loss will be available to offset future taxable income. If not used, this carryforward will begin to expire in 2035. The deferred tax asset relating to the operating loss carryforward has been fully reserved at December 31, 2018 and 2017. The change in the valuation allowance was approximately $32,429 and $95,000 for the years ended December 31, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The principal difference between the operating loss for income tax purposes and reporting purposes is disallowed meals and entertainment and a temporary difference in depreciation expense.

Utilization of the Company’s net operating losses may be subject to substantial annual limitation if the Company experiences a 50% change in ownership, as provided by the Internal Revenue Code and similar state provisions. Such an ownership change would substantially increase the possibility of net operating losses expiring before complete utilization.

Note 9. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

During the year ended December 31, 2019 the Company transferred the 1,000,000 common shares being held as treasury stock, to the two related party note holders, to reduce the loans by $40,000.

None

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Pursuant to Rule 13a-15(b) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“Exchange Act”), the Company carried out an evaluation, with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Company’s President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary, Treasurer and Director, of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined under Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, the Company’s CEO and CFO concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were not effective to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that the Company files or submits under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure for the reasons discussed below.

The management of the Company is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting for the Company. Our internal control system was designed to, in general, provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and board regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements, but because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2018. The framework used by management in making that assessment was the criteria set forth in the document entitled “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on that assessment, our President and Chief Financial Officer have determined and concluded that, as of December 31, 2018, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting were not effective.

A material weakness is a deficiency, or a combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control our financial reporting as of December 31, 2018, the Company determined that the following items constituted a material weakness:

Management believes that the appointment of one or more outside directors, who shall be appointed to a fully functioning audit committee, will remedy the lack of a functioning audit committee and a lack of a majority of outside directors on our Board. Management plans to take action and implementing improvements to our controls and procedures when our financial position permits.

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting. Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to the permanent exemption of the Securities and Exchange Commission that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

No change in our system of internal control over financial reporting occurred during the period covered by this report (i.e. the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018) that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART III

The following table sets forth the name, age, and position of our executive officers and directors. Executive officers are elected annually by our Board of Directors. Each executive officer holds his office until he resigns, is removed by the Board, or his successor is elected and qualified. Directors are elected annually by our shareholders at the annual meeting. Each director holds his office until his successor is elected and qualified or his earlier resignation or removal.

Thomas Tran (CTO/CEO) Age 51. Mr. Tran will handle all aspects of management for the business. Thomas will be responsible for providing strategic leadership for the company by working with the Board and management team to establish long-range goals, strategies, plans, and policies. He will also be responsible for establishing the OptiLeaf’s technical vision and leading all aspects of technology development, according to the Company’s strategic direction and growth objective. During the last 5 years, Thomas was the CEO of Eman Technologies, Inc. Eman Technology is a Free-to-Air (FTA) satellite equipment distributor, developer, and importer. It distributes satellite reception equipment to broadcasters and equipment resellers as well as providing direct to home “DTH” sales and call center support services. Thomas resigned as CEO of Eman on 12-31-2014 to concentrate on OptiLeaf. Mr. Tran currently holds no official position with Eman, other than assisting in the wind up of the business of Eman, which is being discontinued.

Thomas received his BS degree in computer science from Wichita State University, as well as an MBA degree from Webster University.

Nick Nguyen (COO/CFO) Age 39 Mr. Nguyen will take OptiLeaf’s mission and communicate it daily within the organization to ensure that all team members clearly understand the plan and the business. During the past 5 years, Nick was a Founder and as CEO ran CN Cash for Gold in Kansas City and Wichita Kansas. Nick earned a BS degree in Aerospace Engineering from Wichita State University in Kansas.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships among any of the directors and executive officers, with the exception of Nick Nguyen and Thomas Tran, who are brothers in law.

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

Our directors and officers have not been convicted in a criminal proceeding, excluding traffic violations or similar misdemeanors, nor have been a party to any judicial or administrative proceeding during the past ten years that resulted in a judgment, decree or final order enjoining the person from future violations of, or prohibiting activities subject to, federal or state securities laws, or a finding of any violation of federal or state securities laws, except for matters that were dismissed without sanction or settlement. Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” our directors and officers have not been involved in any transactions with us or any of our affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Code of Business Conduct and Ethics

To date, we have not adopted a code of business conduct and ethics for our management and employees. We intend to adopt one in the near future. Except as set forth in our discussion below in “Certain Relationships and Related Transactions,” none of our directors or executive officers has been involved in any transactions with us or any of our directors, executive officers, affiliates or associates which are required to be disclosed pursuant to the rules and regulations of the SEC.

Summary Compensation Table — January 1 2017 through December 31, 2018.

The following table sets forth information concerning all cash and non-cash compensation awarded to, earned by or paid to the named persons for services rendered in all capacities during the noted periods.

The following table sets forth certain information regarding our shares of common stock beneficially owned as of December 31, 2018, (i) each stockholder known to be the beneficial owner of 5% or more of our outstanding shares of common stock, (ii) each named executive officer and director, and (iii) all executive officers and directors as a group. A person is considered to beneficially own any shares: (i) over which such person, directly or indirectly, exercises sole or shared voting or investment power, or (ii) of which such person has the right to acquire beneficial ownership at any time within 60 days through an exercise of stock options or warrants or otherwise. Unless otherwise indicated, voting and investment power relating to the shares shown in the table for our directors and executive officers is exercised solely by the beneficial owner or shared by the owner and the owner’s spouse or children.

For purposes of this table, a person or group of persons is deemed to have “beneficial ownership” of any shares of common stock that such person has the right to acquire within 60 days of the date of this prospectus. For purposes of computing the percentage of outstanding shares of our common stock held by each person or group of persons named above, any shares that such person or persons has the right to acquire within 60 days of the Closing Date is deemed to be outstanding, but is not deemed to be outstanding for the purpose of computing the percentage ownership of any other person. The inclusion herein of any shares listed as beneficially owned does not constitute an admission of beneficial ownership.

Unless otherwise specified, the address of each of the persons set forth below is in care of the Company, 924 N Main St., Wichita, KS, 67203.

Transactions with Related Parties

Other than stated above, none of the following persons has any direct or indirect material interest in any transaction to which we are a party since our incorporation or in any proposed transaction to which we are proposed to be a party:

The following table includes $5,000 fees billed for auditing and other services provided to us by Soles, Heyn and Company, LLP, plus $9,000 billed by Assurance Dimensions, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2018 and by Soles, Heyn and Company LLP, for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017:

PART IV

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

Date: December 18, 2020

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.