OREGON PACIFIC BANCORP - Quarter Report: 2006 September (Form 10-Q)
FORM
10-Q
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
(Mark
one)
T
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
quarterly period ended September 30, 2006
£
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF
1934
|
For
the
transition period from
to
OREGON
PACIFIC BANCORP
(Exact
name of Registrant as specified in its charter)
Oregon
|
71-0918151
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
1355
Highway 101
Florence,
Oregon 97439
(Address
of principal executive offices)
(541)
997-7121
(Issuer’s
telephone number)
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file
such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past
90 days.
Yes
T
|
No
£
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of “Accelerated
Filer and Large Accelerated Filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(check one): Large Accelerated Filer £
Accelerated Filer £
Non-accelerated Filer T
Indicate
by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
£
|
No
T
|
The
number of shares outstanding of the issuer’s Common Stock, no par value, as of
October 31, 2006, was 2,183,614.
OREGON
PACIFIC BANCORP
INDEX
Part
I
|
Financial
Information
|
||
3
|
|||
4-5
|
|||
6
|
|||
7
|
|||
8-13
|
|||
|
|||
13-19
|
|||
|
|||
|
Item 3. |
19
|
|
|
|||
|
Item 4. |
19-20
|
|
|
|||
Part
II.
|
Other
Information
|
|
|
|
|||
20
|
|||
|
|||
20
|
|||
|
|||
20
|
|||
|
|||
20
|
|||
|
|||
20
|
|||
|
|||
20
|
|||
|
|||
20-21
|
|||
|
|||
22
|
|||
Certifications
of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
|
23-25
|
PART
1.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
statements
|
OREGON
PACIFIC BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(Unaudited)
ASSETS
|
September
30,
2006
|
December
31,
2005
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
3,584,844
|
$
|
5,018,838
|
|||
Interest-bearing
deposits in banks
|
5,219,797
|
5,916,224
|
|||||
Available-for-sale
securities, at fair value
|
10,921,464
|
11,643,557
|
|||||
Restricted
equity securities
|
1,023,100
|
1,023,100
|
|||||
Loans
held-for-sale
|
879,431
|
1,350,810
|
|||||
Loans,
net of allowance for loan losses and deferred fees
|
125,349,617
|
117,985,801
|
|||||
Premises
& equipment, net
|
5,941,883
|
5,232,814
|
|||||
Intangible
assets, net
|
397,900
|
-
|
|||||
Accrued
interest and other assets
|
2,460,549
|
2,269,861
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
155,778,585
|
$
|
150,441,005
|
|||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
|||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||
Demand
deposits
|
$
|
34,823,208
|
$
|
29,668,703
|
|||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
45,038,089
|
40,468,295
|
|||||
Savings
deposits
|
16,142,455
|
18,433,466
|
|||||
Time
certificate accounts:
|
|||||||
$100,000
or more
|
15,100,204
|
15,709,566
|
|||||
Other
time certificate accounts
|
15,465,518
|
17,049,226
|
|||||
Total
deposits
|
126,569,474
|
121,329,256
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank borrowings and other debt
|
10,493,556
|
11,412,806
|
|||||
Floating
rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures (Trust Preferred
Securities)
|
4,124,000
|
4,124,000
|
|||||
Deferred
compensation liability
|
2,096,197
|
1,865,781
|
|||||
Accrued
interest and other liabilities
|
984,376
|
1,445,931
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
144,267,603
|
140,177,774
|
|||||
Stockholders'
equity
|
|||||||
Common
stock, no par value, 10,000,000 shares authorized with 2,183,614
and
2,166,006 issued and outstanding at September 30, 2006 and December
31,
2005, respectively
|
5,050,812
|
4,858,728
|
|||||
Undivided
profits
|
6,445,857
|
5,376,065
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income, net of tax
|
14,313
|
28,438
|
|||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
11,510,982
|
10,263,231
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$
|
155,778,585
|
$
|
150,441,005
|
See
accompanying notes
OREGON
PACIFIC BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
INTEREST
INCOME
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
2,857,354
|
$
|
2,339,065
|
$
|
7,999,133
|
$
|
6,835,467
|
|||||
Interest
on investment securities:
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasuries and agencies
|
37,244
|
37,244
|
110,947
|
125,164
|
|||||||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
71,040
|
80,160
|
220,552
|
241,133
|
|||||||||
Corporate
and other investments
|
7,872
|
12,238
|
32,128
|
64,899
|
|||||||||
Interest
on deposits in banks
|
112,981
|
63,705
|
347,580
|
110,600
|
|||||||||
Total
interest income
|
3,086,491
|
2,532,412
|
8,710,340
|
7,377,263
|
|||||||||
INTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
demand deposits
|
325,055
|
195,796
|
815,436
|
485,790
|
|||||||||
Savings
deposits
|
28,572
|
24,554
|
80,851
|
73,357
|
|||||||||
Time
deposits
|
304,193
|
224,602
|
865,679
|
533,398
|
|||||||||
Other
borrowings
|
201,998
|
171,050
|
621,706
|
522,604
|
|||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
859,818
|
616,002
|
2,383,672
|
1,615,149
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
2,226,673
|
1,916,410
|
6,326,668
|
5,762,114
|
|||||||||
PROVISION
FOR LOAN LOSSES
|
-
|
30,000
|
26,000
|
245,000
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
2,226,673
|
1,886,410
|
6,300,668
|
5,517,114
|
|||||||||
NONINTEREST
INCOME
|
-
|
||||||||||||
Service
charges and fees
|
236,491
|
265,000
|
747,905
|
736,603
|
|||||||||
Trust
fee income
|
177,885
|
156,701
|
502,077
|
458,873
|
|||||||||
Mortgage
loan sales and servicing fees
|
102,005
|
194,024
|
347,589
|
479,696
|
|||||||||
Investment
sales commissions
|
100,530
|
36,486
|
312,347
|
100,399
|
|||||||||
Other
income
|
51,083
|
236,714
|
124,463
|
363,425
|
|||||||||
Total
noninterest income
|
667,994
|
888,925
|
2,034,381
|
2,138,996
|
OREGON
PACIFIC BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(Unaudited)
(continued)
|
Three
Months Ended
September
30,
|
Nine
Months Ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
2006
|
2005
|
||||||||||
NONINTEREST
EXPENSE
|
|||||||||||||
Salaries
and benefits
|
$
|
1,265,594
|
$
|
1,093,331
|
$
|
3,714,467
|
$
|
3,259,119
|
|||||
Occupancy
|
227,108
|
233,991
|
681,511
|
664,066
|
|||||||||
Supplies
|
49,557
|
42,958
|
129,826
|
131,790
|
|||||||||
Postage
and freight
|
27,005
|
21,603
|
76,815
|
71,028
|
|||||||||
Outside
services
|
178,482
|
168,615
|
524,778
|
500,554
|
|||||||||
Advertising
|
33,007
|
27,222
|
63,380
|
78,454
|
|||||||||
Loan
collection expense
|
48,804
|
12,471
|
73,845
|
41,014
|
|||||||||
Securities
and trust department expenses
|
85,123
|
40,424
|
224,725
|
125,356
|
|||||||||
Other
expenses
|
175,152
|
181,568
|
554,047
|
505,882
|
|||||||||
Total
noninterest expense
|
2,089,832
|
1,822,183
|
6,043,394
|
5,377,263
|
|||||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
804,835
|
953,152
|
2,291,655
|
2,278,847
|
|||||||||
PROVISION
FOR INCOME TAXES
|
280,593
|
370,596
|
808,602
|
900,381
|
|||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
524,242
|
582,556
|
1,483,053
|
1,378,466
|
|||||||||
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gain/(loss) arising during the period, net of tax
|
57,797
|
(67,830
|
)
|
(14,125
|
)
|
(145,850
|
)
|
||||||
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
$
|
582,039
|
$
|
514,726
|
$
|
1,468,928
|
$
|
1,232,616
|
|||||
EARNINGS
PER SHARE OF COMMON STOCK
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.24
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
0.68
|
$
|
0.64
|
|||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.24
|
$
|
0.27
|
$
|
0.68
|
$
|
0.64
|
|||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
|||||||||||||
Basic
|
2,181,925
|
2,157,123
|
2,176,705
|
2,152,399
|
|||||||||
Diluted
|
2,191,395
|
2,166,789
|
2,184,979
|
2,158,007
|
See
accompanying notes
OREGON
PACIFIC BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Unaudited)
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||
Other
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Common
Stock
|
Undivided
|
Comprehensive
|
Stockholders'
|
|||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Profits
|
Income
|
Equity
|
||||||||||||
Balance,
December 31, 2005
|
2,166,006
|
$
|
4,858,728
|
$
|
5,376,065
|
$
|
28,438
|
$
|
10,263,231
|
|||||||
Bonuses
paid in stock
|
1,686
|
20,000
|
-
|
-
|
20,000
|
|||||||||||
Exercise
of stock options
|
4,212
|
22,500
|
-
|
-
|
22,500
|
|||||||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
-
|
11,439
|
-
|
-
|
11,439
|
|||||||||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
-
|
-
|
(275,116
|
)
|
-
|
(275,116
|
)
|
|||||||||
Dividends
reinvested in stock
|
11,710
|
138,145
|
(138,145
|
)
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||||
Net
income and comprehensive income
|
-
|
-
|
1,483,053
|
(14,125
|
)
|
1,468,928
|
||||||||||
Balance,
September 30, 2006
|
2,183,614
|
$
|
5,050,812
|
$
|
6,445,857
|
$
|
14,313
|
$
|
11,510,982
|
See
accompanying notes
OREGON
PACIFIC BANCORP
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
Nine
Months Ended September 30,
|
|||||||
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
1,483,053
|
$
|
1,378,466
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash from operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
416,485
|
364,563
|
|||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
26,000
|
245,000
|
|||||
Federal
Home Loan Bank stock dividends
|
-
|
(3,000
|
)
|
||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
11,439
|
-
|
|||||
Net
change in mortgage loans held-for-sale
|
471,379
|
(373,858
|
)
|
||||
Loss
on disposition of premises, equipment, and other real
estate
|
-
|
3,215
|
|||||
Net
increase in accrued interest and other assets
|
(181,270
|
)
|
(120,130
|
)
|
|||
Net
(decrease) increase in accrued interest and other
liabilities
|
(231,139
|
)
|
160,099
|
||||
|
|||||||
Net
cash from operating activities
|
1,995,947
|
1,654,355
|
|||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Proceeds
from sales and maturities of available-for-sale securities
|
690,000
|
3,158,836
|
|||||
Net
increase in interest-bearing deposits in banks
|
696,427
|
(5,092,083
|
)
|
||||
Loans
originated, net of principal repayments
|
(7,389,816
|
)
|
(9,150,992
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of premises and equipment
|
(1,075,604
|
)
|
(175,913
|
)
|
|||
Purchase
of brokerage firm assets
|
(439,300
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
cash from investing activities
|
(7,518,293
|
)
|
(11,260,152
|
)
|
|||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Net
increase in demand and savings deposit accounts
|
7,433,288
|
4,722,128
|
|||||
Net
(decrease) increase in time deposits
|
(2,193,070
|
)
|
7,589,939
|
||||
Proceeds
from Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
1,522,000
|
4,900,000
|
|||||
Repayment
of Federal Home Loan Bank borrowings
|
(2,441,250
|
)
|
(6,341,250
|
)
|
|||
Shares
acquired in stock repurchase plan
|
-
|
(31,610
|
)
|
||||
Proceeds
from exercise of common stock options
|
22,500
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
for issuance of common stock
|
-
|
1,003
|
|||||
Stock
bonuses granted
|
20,000
|
-
|
|||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(275,116
|
)
|
(216,877
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash from financing activities
|
4,088,352
|
10,623,333
|
|||||
NET
(DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
(1,433,994
|
)
|
1,017,536
|
||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, beginning of period
|
$
|
5,018,838
|
$
|
4,341,385
|
|||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, end of period
|
$
|
3,584,844
|
$
|
5,358,921
|
|||
SCHEDULE
OF NONCASH ACTIVITIES
|
|||||||
Stock
dividends reinvested
|
$
|
138,145
|
$
|
126,292
|
|||
Change
in fair value of AFS securities, net of tax
|
$
|
(14,125
|
)
|
$
|
(145,850
|
)
|
See
accompanying notes
Oregon
Pacific Bancorp
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
September
30, 2006
(Unaudited)
Note
1 -
Organization and Basis of Presentation
The
unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
Oregon Pacific Bancorp (“Bancorp”), an Oregon corporation and a registered
financial holding company, and its wholly-owned subsidiary Oregon Pacific Bank
(the “Bank”), after elimination of intercompany transactions and balances.
Substantially all activity of Bancorp is conducted through its banking
subsidiary.
Oregon
Pacific Bancorp, an Oregon Corporation and financial holding company, became
the
holding company of Oregon Pacific Bank (collectively, the “Company”) effective
January 1, 2003 through a Plan of Share Exchange approved by Bank shareholders
on December 19, 2002. The Bank is a state-chartered institution authorized
to
provide banking services by the State of Oregon, from its headquarters in
Florence, Oregon. Full-service banking products are offered to the Bank’s
customers who live primarily in Lane, Douglas, and Coos counties and on the
central Oregon coast. In December 2003, Bancorp formed Oregon Pacific Statutory
Trust I, a wholly-owned Connecticut statutory business trust, for purposes
of
issuing guaranteed undivided beneficial interests in Junior Subordinated
Deferrable Interest Debentures. The Bank is subject to the regulations of
certain federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those
regulatory authorities.
In
preparing the financial statements, management is required to make estimates
and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts and balances for the periods
presented. Actual results could differ from those estimated. Additionally,
the
results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2006 are not
necessarily indicative of results to be anticipated for the year ending December
31, 2006. The interim financial statements should be read in conjunction with
the audited financial statements, including the notes thereto, contained in
the
Company’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders.
The
unaudited consolidated interim financial statements have been prepared in
conformity with accounting principals generally accepted in the United States
of
America and industry practice. Certain information in footnote disclosures
normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting
principals generally accepted in the United States of America and industry
practice have been condensed or omitted pursuant to rules and regulations of
the
Securities and Exchange Commission.
Reclassifications
- Certain reclassifications have been made to the 2005 financial statements
to
conform to current year presentations.
Note
2 -
Securities Available-for-Sale
The
following table presents the fair value of investments with continuous
unrealized losses for less than or more than 12 months as of September 30,
2006.
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
Less
than
12
Months
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
More
than
12
Months
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
||||||||||||
September
30, 2006:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and agencies
|
$
|
4,000,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(61,875
|
)
|
$
|
3,938,125
|
|||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
6,443,540
|
89,544
|
-
|
(8,609
|
)
|
6,524,475
|
||||||||||
Corporate
notes
|
454,069
|
4,795
|
-
|
-
|
458,864
|
|||||||||||
$
|
10,897,609
|
$
|
94,339
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(70,484
|
)
|
$
|
10,921,464
|
||||||
December
31, 2005:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Treasury and agencies
|
$
|
4,000,000
|
$
|
-
|
$
|
(12,500
|
)
|
$
|
(63,125
|
)
|
$
|
3,924,375
|
||||
State
and political subdivisions
|
6,884,782
|
123,997
|
(8,861
|
)
|
(6,304
|
)
|
6,993,614
|
|||||||||
Corporate
notes
|
711,378
|
14,328
|
(138
|
)
|
-
|
725,568
|
||||||||||
$
|
11,596,160
|
$
|
138,325
|
$
|
(21,499
|
)
|
$
|
(69,429
|
)
|
$
|
11,643,557
|
For
the
securities exhibiting unrealized losses, that is, they currently have fair
values less than amortized costs, the Bank has evaluated these securities and
has determined that the decline in value is temporary and is related to the
change in market interest rates since purchase. The following information was
also considered in determining that the impairments are not
other-than-temporary. U.S. Government agencies securities have minimal credit
risk as they play a vital role in the nation’s financial markets. State and
political subdivisions and corporate securities have a credit rating of at
least
investment grade by one of the nationally recognized rating agencies. The
decline in value is not related to any company or industry-specific event and
the Bank anticipates full recovery of amortized costs with respect to these
securities at maturity or sooner in the event of a more favorable market
interest rate environment.
Note
3 -
Mortgage Servicing Rights
The
Company recognizes as assets the rights to service mortgage loans for others,
known as MSRs. MSRs are capitalized based on the relative fair value of the
servicing right and the mortgage loan on the date the mortgage loan is sold
and
amortized over the life of the loan. Utilizing assumptions about factors such
as
discount rates, mortgage loan prepayment speeds, market trends and industry
demand, an estimate of the fair value of the Company’s capitalized MSRs is
performed quarterly by management. Since valuation is determined using
discounted cash flow models, the primary risk inherent in MSRs is the impact
of
prepayment speeds on the estimated life of the servicing revenue stream. The
use
of different estimates or assumptions could produce a different fair value.
At
September 30, 2006, the Company’s related loan balances serviced by the Company
for others totaled $96.4 million.
The
following summarizes the Company’s activity related to mortgage servicing rights
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005:
Mortgage
Servicing Rights at September 30,
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
Balance
at beginning of year
|
$
|
808,709
|
$
|
811,436
|
|||
Additions
|
67,341
|
75,117
|
|||||
Amortization
|
(95,717
|
)
|
(91,499
|
)
|
|||
Balance
at September 30,
|
$
|
780,333
|
$
|
795,054
|
For
the
nine months ended September 30, 2006 and 2005 there were no impairment
charges recorded.
Note
4 -
Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses
The
composition of the loan portfolio was as follows as of the dates
presented:
SEPT.
30, 2006
|
DEC.
31, 2005
|
||||||
Real
estate
|
$
|
21,495,621
|
$
|
18,583,333
|
|||
Commercial
|
97,748,247
|
94,138,523
|
|||||
Installment
|
8,367,561
|
7,541,900
|
|||||
Overdrafts
|
29,871
|
72,495
|
|||||
Total
Loans
|
127,641,300
|
120,336,251
|
|||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(1,883,435
|
)
|
(1,858,185
|
)
|
|||
Less
deferred loan fees
|
(408,248
|
)
|
(492,265
|
)
|
|||
Loans,
net of allowance for loan losses and deferred loan fees
|
$
|
125,349,617
|
$
|
117,985,801
|
Changes
in the allowance for loan losses were as follows for the nine-months
ended:
SEPT.
30, 2006
|
SEPT.
30, 2005
|
||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
1,858,185
|
$
|
1,640,060
|
|||
Provision
for loan losses
|
26,000
|
245,000
|
|||||
Loans
charged off
|
(800
|
)
|
(2,023
|
)
|
|||
Loan
recoveries
|
50
|
3,735
|
|||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$
|
1,883,435
|
$
|
1,886,772
|
It
is the
policy of the Bank to place loans on nonaccrual status whenever the collection
of all or a part of the principal is in doubt. Loans placed on nonaccrual status
may or may not be contractually past due at the time of such determination,
and
may or may not be secured by collateral. Loans in the amount of $159,000
and $356,000
were on nonaccrual status at September 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
The
Bank
had no loans past due 90 days or more on which it continued to accrue interest
at either September 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005.
Note
5 -
Earnings per Share of Common Stock
Basic
earnings per share exclude dilution and are computed by dividing net income
by
the weighted average common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted earnings
per share reflect the potential dilution that could occur if common shares
were
issued pursuant to the exercise of options under stock option plans. Weighted
average shares outstanding consist of common shares outstanding and common
stock
equivalents attributable to outstanding stock options.
Note
6 -
Stock-based compensation
Prior
to
January 1, 2006, the Company’s stock option plans were accounted for under
the recognition and measurement provisions of APB Opinion No. 25 (Opinion
25), Accounting for Stock Issued to Employees, and related interpretations,
as
permitted by FASB Statement No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation (as amended by SFAS No. 148, Accounting for Stock-Based
Compensation Transition and Disclosure) (collectively SFAS 123). No stock-based
employee compensation cost was recognized in the Company’s Statements of
Operations through December 31, 2005, as all options granted to employees
under the plans had an exercise price equal to the market value of the
underlying common stock on the date of grant. Effective January 1, 2006,
the Company adopted the fair value recognition provisions of FASB Statement
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (SFAS 123(R)), using the modified-
prospective-transition method. Under that transition method, compensation cost
recognized in 2006 includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based
payments granted prior to, but not yet vested as of January 1, 2006, based
on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original
provisions of SFAS 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based
payments granted subsequent to December 31, 2005, based on the grant-date
fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS 123(R). As of
January 1, 2006, 20,205 stock options were not fully vested.
The
fair
value of each option grant on the date of grant is estimated using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model based on a weighted average volatility of
15.2%, expected life of options of three to five and one-half years, weighted
average risk free interest rate of 4.7%, and a dividend yield of 2% for grants
in 2006. The fair value of options granted during the quarter ended March 31,
2006 ranged from $1.60 to $2.23; no grants were made in the second or third
quarters.
As
a
result of adopting SFAS 123(R) on January 1, 2006, the Company’s earnings
before income taxes for the three months ended September 30, 2006, was
approximately $3,800 lower than if it had continued to be accounted for as
share-based compensation under Opinion 25. As of September 30, 2006, the Company
had 14,806 nonvested options outstanding and there was $24,900 of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to these nonvested options. This cost
is
expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis, over the vesting periods,
through December 31, 2012. The following table summarizes the change in the
number of stock options at September 30, 2006 and the fair value of the grant
on
the date of grant:
Options
|
Shares
|
Average
Exercise
Price
($)
|
Weighted
Avg.
Grant-Date
Fair
Value
Per
Option ($)
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at January 1, 2006
|
25,402
|
6.69
|
||||||||
Granted
|
13,082
|
11.85
|
1.92
|
|||||||
Exercised
|
4,212
|
5.34
|
|
|||||||
Outstanding
at Sept. 30. 2006
|
34,272
|
8.45
|
1.54
|
|||||||
Exercisable
at Sept. 30, 2006
|
19,466
|
6.94
|
1.31
|
On
March
16, 2006 the Board of Directors of the Company modified the vesting period
of
all incentive stock options granted after 2002 and allowed for accelerated
vesting when an employee reaches retirement age and ceases continuous service.
Under SFAS 123(R), grants issued subsequent to adoption of SFAS 123(R) which
are
subject to such an accelerated vesting upon the recipient’s attainment of
retirement age, are expensed over the shorter of the time to retirement age
or
the vesting schedule in accordance with the grant. Thus the vesting period
can
be less than the plan’s five-year vesting period depending on the age of the
grantee.
There
were no options granted and no options exercised during the quarter ended
September 30, 2006. The following table summarizes information about the stock
options outstanding at September 30, 2006:
Exercise
Price
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Avg.
Remaining
Contractual
Life
(years)
|
Options
Exercisable
|
||||||||||
$
|
4.81
|
2,597
|
4.3
|
2,597
|
|||||||||
$
|
7.25
|
17,242
|
2.4
|
15,518
|
|||||||||
$
|
7.40
|
1,351
|
1.5
|
1,351
|
|||||||||
$
|
11.85
|
13,082
|
5.1
|
-
|
|||||||||
Weighted
Average
Per
Share Price
|
$
|
8.83
|
34,272
|
19,466
|
The
following table illustrates the effect on net income and income per share for
the periods ended September 30, 2005, if the Company had applied the fair value
recognition provisions of SFAS No. 123 to stock-based employee
compensation.
9
Months Ended
September
30, 2005
|
||||
Net
earnings, as reported
|
$
|
1,378,466
|
||
Deduct:
Total stock-based employee compensation expense determined under
the fair
value-based method for all awards, net of related tax
effects
|
(3,636
|
)
|
||
Pro
forma net earnings
|
$
|
1,374,830
|
||
Basic
earnings per common share:
|
||||
As
reported
|
$
|
0.64
|
||
Pro
forma
|
$
|
0.64
|
||
Diluted
earnings per common share:
|
||||
As
reported
|
$
|
0.64
|
||
Pro
forma
|
$
|
0.64
|
The
fair
value of each option granted is estimated on the date of grant using the
Black-Scholes option pricing model with the following assumptions for grants
during the period ended September 30, 2005:
2005
|
||||
Dividend
yield
|
2.44
|
%
|
||
Expected
life (years)
|
7.5
|
|||
Expected
volatility
|
14.39
|
%
|
||
Risk-free
rate
|
4.50
|
%
|
Note
7 -
Acquisition of Brokerage Firm Assets
On
January 3, 2006, the Bank acquired all of the assets of Coast Investment
Advisors, Inc., the local Florence branch of LPL Financial Services, Inc.
As a result of the acquisition, the Bank recorded $460,000 in intangible assets,
which consist of a customer list and a non-compete agreement, which are
amortized on a straight-line basis over the estimated lives of the asset, both
of which are 60 months. The amortization of the non-compete agreement will
begin
at the end of a three-year employment contract. This acquisition was consistent
with the Bank’s strategy to grow the Trust and Investment Department and
provided an opportunity to increase the customer base in this area.
The
aggregate purchase price was $462,000, which included cash of $140,000 and
an
unsecured Note Payable of $322,000. Interest on the note payable is 7% and
paid
monthly, while principal payments are made in three equal annual installments,
with the final payment due in February 2009. No liabilities or obligations
were
assumed in the transaction.
Note
8 -
Accounting Pronouncements
In
February 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB
Statement No. 155, Accounting for Certain Hybrid Instruments. The
Statement provides entities with relief from having to separately determine
the
fair value of an embedded derivative that would otherwise be required to be
bifurcated from its host contract in accordance with Statement 133.
Statement 155 allows an entity to make an irrevocable election to measure such
a
hybrid financial instrument at fair value in its entirety, with changes in
fair
value recognized in earnings. The Statement also (1) clarifies which
interest-only strips and principal-only strips are not subject to Statement
133;
(2) establishes a requirement for holders of securitized financial assets to
evaluate whether the interest is a freestanding derivative or a hybrid financial
instrument that contains an embedded derivative requiring bifurcation; (3)
clarifies that concentrations of credit risk in the form of subordination are
not embedded derivatives; and (4) eliminates the prohibition on a qualifying
special-purpose entity from holding a derivative financial instrument that
pertains to a beneficial interest other than another derivative financial
instrument. The Statement is effective for all financial instruments
acquired, issued or subject to a re-measurement event occurring after the
beginning of an entity’s first fiscal year that begins after September 15, 2006,
and is not expected to have any significant impact on the Bank’s financial
condition or results of operations.
In
March
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued FAS No. 156,
Accounting for Servicing of Financial Assets - an amendment of FASB Statement
No. 140, which changes the accounting for all loan servicing rights
which are recorded as the result of selling a loan where the seller
undertakes an obligation to service the loan, usually in exchange for
compensation. The statement amends current accounting guidance by permitting
the
servicing right to be recorded initially at fair value and also permits the
subsequent reporting of these assets at fair value. It is effective beginning
January 1, 2007. Management does not expect the adoption of this standard
to have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements.
In
July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”), Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes: an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. FIN
48
clarifies Statement 109, Accounting for Income Taxes, to indicate a criterion
that an individual tax position would have to meet for some or all of the
benefit of that position to be recognized in an entity’s financial statements.
FIN 48 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2006 and
is
not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s consolidated
financial condition or results of operations.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, FairValue Measurements. The
Statement provides enhanced guidance for measuring assets and liabilities using
fair value and applies whenever other standards require or permit assets or
liabilities to be measured at fair value. Statement 157 also requires expanded
disclosure of items that are measured at fair value, the information used to
measure fair value, and the effect of fair value measurements on earnings.
The
Statement is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years
beginning after November 15, 2007 and is not expected to have a significant
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition or results of
operations.
In
October 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers’ Accounting for Defined
Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans. The Statement is an amendment
of
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). Statement 158 requires most public
companies, as defined in the Statement, to fully recognize an asset or liability
for the overfunded or underfunded status of their post retirement benefit
plans in financial statements. The Statement is effective for entities with
publicly traded equity securities for fiscal years ending after December 15,
2006 and is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s
consolidated financial condition or results of operations.
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
This
report contains a number of forward looking statements about our anticipated
business, operations, financial performance and cash flows. Statements in this
report that relate to future plans, events and circumstances are provided to
describe management's intentions and expectations based on currently available
information, and readers should not construe these statements as assurances
or
guarantees. As with any predictions, these statements are inherently difficult
to make with any degree of assurance, and actual results may differ materially
and adversely from management's expectations described herein. Likewise,
management's plans described in this report may not come to pass because
unforeseen events may force management to deviate from its expressed intentions.
Forward-looking statements often can be identified by the use of predictive
or
prospective terms such as "expect," "anticipate," "believe," "plan," "intend,"
and words of similar construction or meaning. Some of the events or
circumstances that may cause our actual results to deviate from management's
expectations include the impact of competition and local and regional economic
factors upon our customer base, our deposits and our loan portfolio; economic
and regulatory limits on our ability to grow our assets and manage our business;
customer acceptance of our products; interest rate fluctuations that may
adversely impact our revenues and expenses; and the impact of impairment charges
upon our intangible and other assets. Other factors that may adversely impact
our performance are discussed in this report as well as other disclosures we
make from time to time in our filings with the Securities and Exchange
Commission or other federal agencies. Readers also should note that
forward-looking statements expressed in this report are made as of the date
of
this report, and management cannot undertake to update those statements to
reflect future events or circumstances.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
On
an
ongoing basis, management evaluates the estimates used, including the adequacy
of the allowance for loan losses and the recorded value of the mortgage
servicing asset. Estimates are based upon historical experience, current
economic conditions, and other factors that management considers reasonable
under the circumstances. These estimates result in judgments regarding the
carrying values of assets and liabilities when these values are not readily
available from other sources as well as assessing and identifying the accounting
treatments of commitments and contingencies.
The
allowance for loan losses is an amount that management believes will be adequate
to absorb possible losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible based
upon evaluations of the collectibility of loans and prior loan loss experience.
Management also attempts to ensure that the overall allowance appropriately
reflects a margin for the imprecision in an estimation process and evaluates
factors such as the trend in the loan growth and the percentage of change,
the
level of geographic and/or industry concentrations, competitive issues that
impact the loan underwriting or structure, and economic conditions. While
management believes that the allowance for loan losses is sufficient to absorb
losses inherent in the loan portfolio and credit commitments outstanding based
on the best information available, the assessment cannot be determined with
precision and may not necessarily be indicative of future losses.
Overview
Oregon
Pacific Bancorp ("Bancorp"), an Oregon corporation and financial bank holding
company, is the holding company of Oregon Pacific Bank (the "Bank")
(collectively, the “Company”). The Company is headquartered in Florence,
Oregon.
The
Bank
is an Oregon banking corporation organized under the Oregon Bank Act on December
17, 1979. The Bank is a full-service commercial bank that provides a broad
range
of depository and lending services to commercial enterprises, governmental
entities and individuals. Full-service banking products are offered to the
Bank’s customers from its four branches who live primarily in Lane, Douglas, and
Coos counties and on the central Oregon coast. Additional financial services
provided by the Bank include trust and asset management services and investment
and brokerage services. The Bank is subject to the regulations of certain
federal and state agencies and undergoes periodic examinations by those
regulatory authorities.
The
Company has a two-tiered corporate structure. At the holding company level
the
affairs of Bancorp, the sole owner of the Bank, are overseen by a Board of
Directors elected by the shareholders of the Company. The business of the Bank
is overseen by the Bank’s Board of Directors selected by Bancorp’s Board.
Currently the respective members of the Board of Directors of the Bank and
of
Bancorp are identical.
The
Company reported net income of $524,000, or $.24 per diluted share, for the
three months ended September 30, 2006. This compares to Bank income of $582,000,
or $.27 per diluted share, for the same three month period in the prior year
for
a decrease of 10.0%. Income for the nine month period ended September 30, 2006
was $1,483,000 or $.68 per diluted share compared to $1,378,000 or $.64 per
diluted share in the prior year, an increase of 7.6%. 2005 third quarter income
includes an insurance reimbursement for a lawsuit settlement paid in 2004 that
increased 2005 earnings by $0.06 per share. 2005 first quarter income includes
an interest payment for a 2004 principal recovery of a previously charged off
loan and a repayment of certain Bank costs that increased earnings per share
by
$.07. Without the two one-time events in 2005, the current year income would
have grown by $0.17. The increase in income is primarily due to increased net
interest income which has been affected by climbing interest rates and higher
loan portfolio balances; see Table on page 16.
Financial
Condition
Total
assets at September 30, 2006 were $155,779,000 compared to $150,441,000 at
December 31, 2005, an increase of $5,338,000 (3.5%). The increase was due
primarily to increased loan balances ($7.36 million) and was funded by increases
in deposits, primarily demand deposits ($5.15 million).
Stockholders’
equity at September 30, 2006 was $11,511,000, an increase of $1,248,000 from
December 31, 2005. This change resulted from consolidated net income partially
offset by cash dividends paid ($275,000).
The
net
loan portfolio at September 30, 2006 increased $7.3 million to $125.3 million
compared to $118.0 million at December 31, 2005 with growth in both Commercial
and Real Estate Loans. See Note 4 of the financial statements.
Borrowings
from the Federal Home Loan Bank at September 30, 2006 were $10.5 million
compared to $11.4 million at December 31, 2005. In addition to a note associated
with the asset purchase mentioned in Note 7 above, the Bank borrowed $1.2
million during the first quarter of 2006 to match-fund a fixed rate loan and
paid off $1.9 million of matured loans in the second quarter and a $0.5 million
matured loan in the third quarter. The new borrowings averaged 5.08% and the
average rate on all borrowings at September 30, 2006 is 4.36%. The Company
also
has an obligation to pay interest and, at maturity, principal on the floating
rate Junior Subordinated Deferrable Interest Debentures held by Oregon Pacific
Statutory Trust I.
The
Bank
is building a new financial services center on its property behind the current
main office in Florence. It will house the commercial and real estate mortgage
lending activities, loan servicing, the Trust and Asset Management Department,
and the brokerage or Investment Department. Occupancy is expected in spring
of
2007.
As
a
result of the acquisition of the local LPL Financial Services brokerage office
in January 2006, the Company recorded $460,000 of intangible assets. The Company
had no such intangible assets at December 31, 2005.
Results
of Operations
Net
interest income
Net
interest income is the Bank’s primary source of revenue. Net interest income is
the difference between interest income earned from loans and the investment
portfolio, and interest expense paid on customer deposits and debt. Changes
in
net interest income result from changes in volume and changes in rate. Volume
refers to the dollar level of interest earning assets and interest bearing
liabilities. Rate refers to the underlying yields on assets and costs of
liabilities.
Net
interest income on a tax-equivalent basis was $6,441,000 for the three quarters
ended September 30, 2006 compared to $5,617,000 which excludes the one-time
interest payment (discussed above) for the same period in 2005 (see Table
below). The $824,000 increase was due to increases in both the volume and rates
of loans partially offset by an increase in the cost of funds and total
deposits. An increase in interest income of $1.59 million was primarily due
to
increases in loans and interest-earning balances in banks from the same period
one year ago. Rates on interest-earning assets rose to 8.15% for the first
nine
months of 2006 compared to 7.16% in 2005. The $769,000 increase in interest
expense was a result of the effective rate on interest-bearing liabilities
rising to 3.20% compared to 2.09% for the same period in 2005 which reflect
both
rising interest rates and more interest-sensitive depositors shifting to more
time certificates.
Average
Balances and Average Rates Earned and Paid. The
following table shows average balances and interest income or interest expense,
with the resulting average yield or rates by category of average earning asset
or interest-bearing liability:
Nine
Months Ended Sept. 30, 2006
|
Nine
Months Ended Sept. 30, 2005
|
Increase
(Decrease)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
|
Average
|
Interest
|
Average
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average
|
Income
or
|
Yield
or
|
Average
|
Income
or
|
Yield
or
|
Due
to change in
|
Net
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars
in thousands)
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Rates
|
Balance
|
Expense
|
Rates
|
Volume
|
Rate
|
Change
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
assets:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loans
(2),
(3)
|
$
|
122,657
|
$
|
7,999
|
8.70
|
%
|
$
|
116,404
|
$
|
6,568
|
7.52
|
%
|
$
|
353
|
$
|
1,078
|
$
|
1431
|
||||||||||
Investment
securities
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable
securities
|
5,599
|
143
|
3.41
|
%
|
6,230
|
195
|
4.17
|
%
|
(20
|
)
|
(32
|
)
|
(52
|
)
|
||||||||||||||
Nontaxable
securities (1)
|
6,597
|
335
|
6.77
|
%
|
7,211
|
358
|
6.62
|
%
|
(30
|
)
|
7
|
(23
|
)
|
|||||||||||||||
Interest-earning
balances due from banks
|
9,575
|
348
|
4.85
|
%
|
4,769
|
111
|
3.10
|
%
|
112
|
125
|
237
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-earning assets
|
144,428
|
8,825
|
8.15
|
%
|
134,614
|
7,232
|
7.16
|
%
|
415
|
1178
|
1,593
|
|||||||||||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
4,542
|
4,609
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
5,483
|
5,117
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Loan
loss allowance
|
(1,880
|
)
|
(1,806
|
)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
assets
|
4,316
|
3,436
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
156,889
|
145,970
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Interest-bearing
checking and savings accounts
|
$
|
51,810
|
$
|
896
|
2.31
|
%
|
$
|
61,881
|
$
|
559
|
1.20
|
%
|
$
|
(91
|
)
|
$
|
428
|
$
|
337
|
|||||||||
Time
deposit and IRA accounts
|
31,643
|
866
|
3.65
|
%
|
25,884
|
533
|
2.75
|
%
|
118
|
215
|
333
|
|||||||||||||||||
Borrowed
funds
|
15,987
|
622
|
5.19
|
%
|
15,376
|
523
|
4.54
|
%
|
21
|
78
|
99
|
|||||||||||||||||
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
99,440
|
2,384
|
3.20
|
%
|
103,141
|
1,615
|
2.09
|
%
|
48
|
721
|
769
|
|||||||||||||||||
Noninterest-bearing
deposits
|
43,384
|
30,768
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Other
liabilities
|
3,263
|
2,693
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities
|
146,087
|
136,602
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shareholders’
equity
|
10,802
|
9,368
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total
liabilities and share-holders’ equity
|
$
|
156,889
|
$
|
145,970
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
$
|
6,441
|
$
|
5,617
|
$
|
367
|
$
|
457
|
$
|
824
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest spread
|
4.95
|
%
|
5.07
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest expense to average earning assets
|
2.20
|
%
|
1.60
|
%
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
interest margin
|
5.95
|
%
|
5.56
|
%
|
(1)
|
Tax-exempt
income has been adjusted to a tax-equivalent basis at
34%.
|
(2)
|
Nonaccrual
loans are included in the average
balance.
|
(3)
|
2005
excludes one-time interest repayment of $377,000 for a loan charged
off in
1998 and recovered in 2004.
|
Provision
for Loan Losses
A
provision of $26,000 was recorded for the nine months ended September 30, 2006
compared to $245,000 in the same period in 2005. The allowance for loan losses
at September 30, 2006 was 1.47% of gross loans, compared to 1.54% at December
31, 2005. Management believes the reserve is adequate for probable loan losses
in the loan portfolio at September 30, 2006. Management’s assessment of the
adequacy of the allowance for loan loss is based on a number of factors
including current delinquent and non-performing loans, past loan loss
experience, evaluation of customers’ financial strength, and economic trends
impacting areas and customers served by the Bank. The allowance is based on
estimates, and actual losses may vary from those currently
estimated.
Noninterest
Income
Noninterest
income decreased for both the three and nine month periods ending September
30,
2006 compared to the same periods one year earlier.
Three
months ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||
Service
charges and fees
|
$
|
236,491
|
$
|
265,000
|
$
|
(28,509
|
)
|
-10.8
|
%
|
||||
Trust
fee income
|
177,885
|
156,701
|
21,184
|
13.5
|
%
|
||||||||
Mortgage
loan sales and servicing fees
|
102,005
|
194,024
|
(92,019
|
)
|
-47.4
|
%
|
|||||||
Investment
sales commissions
|
100,530
|
36,486
|
64,044
|
175.5
|
%
|
||||||||
Other
income
|
51,083
|
236,714
|
(185,631
|
)
|
-78.4
|
%
|
|||||||
$
|
667,994
|
$
|
888,925
|
$
|
(220,931
|
)
|
-24.9
|
%
|
Nine
months ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||
Service
charges and fees
|
$
|
747,905
|
$
|
736,603
|
$
|
11,302
|
1.5
|
%
|
|||||
Trust
fee income
|
502,077
|
458,873
|
43,204
|
9.4
|
%
|
||||||||
Mortgage
loan sales and servicing fees
|
347,589
|
479,696
|
(132,107
|
)
|
-27.5
|
%
|
|||||||
Investment
sales commissions
|
312,347
|
100,399
|
211,948
|
211.1
|
%
|
||||||||
Other
income
|
124,463
|
363,425
|
(238,962
|
)
|
-65.8
|
%
|
|||||||
$
|
2,034,381
|
$
|
2,138,996
|
$
|
(104,615
|
)
|
-4.9
|
%
|
In
the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 the Bank received repayment for expenses
resulting from a charged-off loan and a reimbursement of insurance from a claim
paid in 2004; no such payments were received in 2006 causing the decrease in
“other income” from the prior year. Mortgage activity has also slowed in 2006
due to the real estate market and higher interest rates. Slightly offsetting
those decreases was an increase of Investment Department commissions subsequent
to the acquisition of the brokerage firm in January as discussed in Note 7.
Noninterest
Expense
Noninterest
expense increased $268,000 or 14.7% for the three months and $666,000 or 12.4%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2006 from the same periods one year
ago.
Three
months ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||
Salaries
and benefits
|
$
|
1,265,594
|
$
|
1,093,331
|
$
|
172,263
|
15.8
|
%
|
|||||
Occupancy
expense
|
227,108
|
233,991
|
(6,883
|
)
|
-2.9
|
%
|
|||||||
Outside
services
|
178,482
|
168,615
|
9,867
|
5.9
|
%
|
||||||||
Securities
and trust department expenses
|
85,123
|
40,424
|
44,699
|
110.6
|
%
|
||||||||
Other
expenses
|
333,525
|
285,822
|
47,703
|
16.7
|
%
|
||||||||
$
|
2,089,832
|
$
|
1,822,183
|
$
|
267,649
|
14.7
|
%
|
Nine
months ended
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||
2006
|
2005
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||
Salaries
and benefits
|
$
|
3,714,467
|
$
|
3,259,119
|
$
|
455,348
|
14.0
|
%
|
|||||
Occupancy
expense
|
681,511
|
664,066
|
17,445
|
2.6
|
%
|
||||||||
Outside
services
|
524,778
|
500,554
|
24,224
|
4.8
|
%
|
||||||||
Securities
and trust department expenses
|
224,725
|
125,356
|
99,369
|
79.3
|
%
|
||||||||
Other
expenses
|
897,913
|
828,168
|
69,745
|
8.4
|
%
|
||||||||
$
|
6,043,394
|
$
|
5,377,263
|
$
|
666,131
|
12.4
|
%
|
Most
of
the increase is attributable to six new full-time equivalent staff, three of
whom were a part of the local brokerage firm acquisition plus the resulting
additional expenses for the Securities Department including amortization of
intangible assets associated with the acquisition.
Provision
for Income Taxes
The
provision for income taxes at September 30, 2006 and 2005 remained consistent
with expected statutory rates adjusted for anticipated permanent differences
arising primarily from nontaxable income earned on municipal security
investments and timing differences associated with the tax treatment of bad
debt.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity
management involves the ability to meet cash flow requirements. The Bank’s major
sources of liquidity are customer deposits, calls and maturities of investment
securities, the use of borrowing arrangements through the Federal Home Loan
Bank
of Seattle, and net cash provided by operating activities. Sales of the Bank’s
investment portfolio are another source of funds, if needed. The investment
portfolio is of high quality and is highly marketable although a gain or loss
would be realized if the market value of securities sold were not equal to
their
adjusted book value at the date of sale.
The
Bank
maintains liquidity levels adequate to fund loan commitments, investment
opportunities, deposit withdrawals and other financial commitments. The Bank's
liquidity position decreased during the quarter ended September 30, 2006 as
the
loan portfolio grew but deposits remained flat. For the nine months of 2006
loans grew at a faster rate than deposits so at September 30 the loan-to-deposit
ratio is 99% compared to 97% at December 31, 2006. Liquidity that is deemed
to
be temporary excess cash may be invested as interest-earning deposits with
the
FHLB or time certificates at other financial institutions. As of September
30,
2006, the Bank had $5.2 million in such funds compared to $5.9 million at
December 31, 2005. Management believes its liquidity planning will adequately
provide the funds necessary to enable the Bank to fund loan commitments and
meet
customer withdrawals of deposits in the normal course of business.
As
disclosed in the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, net cash provided by
operating activities was $2.0 million during the nine months ended September
30,
2006. The principal source of cash provided by operating activities was net
income. Net cash of $7.5 million used in investing activities consisted
principally of $7.4 million of net loan growth, $1.1 million of purchases
of premises and equipment, and $460,000 for the purchase of the assets of the
local LPL Financial Services brokerage office. The $4.1 million of cash provided
by financing activities primarily consisted of $7.4 million demand deposit
accounts, partly offset by $2.2 million decreases in time deposits and
$275,000 payment of dividends.
For
purposes of determining a bank’s deposit insurance assessment, the FDIC has
issued regulations that define a “well capitalized” bank as one with a leverage
ratio of 5% or more and a total risk-based ratio of 10% or more. At September
30, 2006, the Bank’s leverage and total risk-based ratios were 9.55% and 12.51%,
respectively, which exceed the well-capitalized threshold.
Item
3.
|
Quantitive
and Qualitive Disclosures about Market
Risk
|
Market
risk is the risk of loss from adverse changes in market prices and rates. The
Bank’s market risk arises principally from interest rate risk in its lending,
deposit taking, and borrowing activities. A sudden and substantial increase
in
interest rates could adversely impact the Company’s earnings, to the extent that
the interest rates borne by assets and liabilities do not change at the same
speed, to the same extent, or on the same basis.
Management
actively monitors and manages its interest rate risk exposure. Although the
Bank
manages other risks, such as credit quality and liquidity risk, in the normal
course of business, management considers interest rate risk to be a significant
market risk which could have the largest material effect on the Bank’s financial
condition and results of operations.
Through
the Bank’s Asset/Liability Management Committee (“ALCO”), which is comprised of
senior management, the Bank monitors the level and general mix of earning assets
and interest-bearing liabilities, with special attention to those assets and
liabilities which are rate-sensitive. The primary objective of ALCO is managing
the Company’s assets and liabilities in a manner that balances profitability,
interest rate risk, and various other risks including liquidity. ALCO
operates under policies and within risk limits prescribed by, reviewed and
approved by the Board of Directors. The Bank’s strategy has included the funding
of certain fixed rate loans with medium term borrowed funds in order to mitigate
a margin squeeze should interest rates rise. There have been no significant
changes in the Company’s market risk exposure since December 31,
2005.
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
(a)
|
The
Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of its disclosure
controls and procedures as of September 30, 2006. Based on this
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer
each concludes that as of September 30, 2006, the Company maintained
effective disclosure controls and procedures in all material respects,
including those to ensure that information required to be disclosed
in
reports filed or submitted with the SEC is recorded, processed, and
reported within the time periods specified by the SEC, and is accumulated
and communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer
and
the Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow for timely decision
regarding required disclosure.
|
(b)
|
Changes
in Internal Controls: In the quarter ended September 30, 2006, the
Company
did not make any significant changes in, nor take any corrective
actions
regarding, its internal controls or other factors that could significantly
affect these controls.
|
Disclosure
Controls and Internal Controls.
Disclosure controls are procedures that are designed with the objective of
ensuring that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports
filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (Exchange Act) is recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) rules and forms. Disclosure controls
are also designed with the objective of ensuring that such information is
accumulated and communicated to our management, as appropriate to allow timely
decisions regarding required disclosure. Internal Controls are procedures which
are designed with the objective of providing reasonable assurance that (1)
transactions are properly authorized; (2) assets are safeguarded against
unauthorized or improper use; and (3) transactions are properly recorded and
reported, all to permit the preparation of financial statement in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Limitations
on the Effectiveness of Controls.
The
Company’s management does not expect that our disclosure controls or our
internal controls will prevent all errors and all fraud. A control system,
no
matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not
absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Further,
the design of control system must reflect the fact that there are resource
constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to their
costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation
of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances
of fraud, if any, within the Company have been detected. These inherent
limitations include the realities that judgments in decision-making can be
faulty, and that breakdowns can occur because of simple error or mistake.
Additionally, controls can be circumvented by the individual acts of some
persons, by collusion of two or more people, or by management override of the
control. The design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain
assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance
that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential
future conditions; over time, controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures
may
deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control
system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
proceedings.
|
As
of the
date of filing this Form 10-Q neither Bancorp nor the Bank was a party to any
material legal proceedings. Further, management is not aware of any threatened
or pending lawsuits or other proceedings against the Company which, if
determined adversely, would have a material effect on the business or its
financial position. Bancorp or the Bank may from time to time become a party
to
litigation in the ordinary course of business, such as debt collection
litigation or through an appearance as a creditor in a bankruptcy
case.
Item
1A.
|
Risk
factors.
|
There
has
not been any material change in the risk factors disclosure from that contained
in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2005.
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
sales of equity securities and use of
proceeds.
|
In
August
2005 the Board of Directors approved the Bancorp Amended Dividend Reinvestment
Plan that permits the direct purchase of additional shares of Bancorp Common
Stock for cash in addition to the automatic reinvestment of cash dividends.
During 2005, 1,081 shares were purchased by existing shareholders at an average
price of $10.18 per share as part of the new Plan. No such purchases were made
in the first three quarters of 2006.
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon senior securities.
|
None.
Item
4.
|
Submission
of matters to a vote of security
holders.
|
None.
Item
5.
|
Other
information.
|
None.
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
and reports on Form 8-K.
|
(a)
|
Exhibits.
|
The
following documents are filed as part of this Form 10-Q as required by Item
601
of Regulation S-K:
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation of Oregon Pacific Bancorp (incorporated herein by
reference to Exhibit 3(i) to Oregon Pacific Bancorp’s Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on September 30, 2003).
|
3.2
|
Bylaws
of Oregon Pacific Bancorp (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibit
3(i) to Oregon Pacific Bancorp’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2002 filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September
30,
2003).
|
10.1
|
2003
Stock Incentive Plan (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 1 to Oregon
Pacific Bancorp’s Form DEF 14A filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 25, 2003).
|
10.2
|
Oregon
Pacific Bank Deferred Compensation and Incentive Plan (incorporated
herein
by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to Oregon Pacific Bancorp’s Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2003 filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2004).
|
Certification
of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
and Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.**
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to rule 13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a)
and Section 302(a) of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.**
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section
906 of
the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. **
|
_________________
**
Filed
herewith.
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the
registrant has caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto, duly authorized, in the City of Florence, State of Oregon, on
November 14, 2006.
OREGON
PACIFIC BANCORP
|
|||
By:
|
/s/
Thomas K. Grove
|
||
Thomas
K. Grove
|
|||
President,
Chief Executive Officer
And
Director (Chief
Executive Officer)
|
|||
By:
|
/s/
Joanne Forsberg
|
||
Joanne
Forsberg
|
|||
Chief
Financial Officer and Secretary
(Principal
Financial Officer)
|
22