Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc. - Annual Report: 2017 (Form 10-K)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

☒       ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: October 31, 2017

☐        TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from: _____________________

Commission file number: 000-55008

ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

4045 Sheridan Ave, Suite 239

Miami, FL 33140

(Address of principal executive offices)

(888) 963-7881

(Issuer’s telephone number)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

Common Stock, $0.001 par value

(Title of class)

With a copy to:

Richard C. Fox, Esq.

Fox Law Offices, P.A.

561 NE Zebrina Senda

Jensen Beach, FL 34957

T: 772.225.6435

rickfoxesq@gmail.com

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files).

Yes ☐ No ☒

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “non-accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes ☐ No ☒

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter. $419,190 based on the closing price of $0.012 per share of common stock and 34,359,797 shares of common stock of the Registrant held by non-affiliates on April 28, 2017, the last business day of the Registrant’s mostly recently completed second fiscal quarter.

As of November 1, 2018, there were 432,290,110 shares of common stock, $0.001 par value per share, issued and outstanding.

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE: None

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K and certain information incorporated herein by reference contain forward-looking statements and information within the “safe harbor” provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. This information includes assumptions made by, and information currently available to management, including statements regarding future economic performance and financial condition, liquidity and capital resources, acceptance of our products by the market, and management’s plans and objectives. In addition, certain statements included in this and our future filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), in press releases, and in oral and written statements made by us or with our approval, which are not statements of historical fact, are forward-looking statements. Words such as “may,” “could,” “should,” “would,” “believe,” “expect,” “expectation,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” “intend,” “seeks,” “plan,” “project,” “continue,” “predict,” “will,” “should,” and other words or expressions of similar meaning are intended by us to identify forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain these identifying words. These forward-looking statements are found at various places throughout this report and in the documents incorporated herein by reference. These statements are based on our current expectations about future events or results and information that is currently available to us, involve assumptions, risks, and uncertainties, and speak only as of the date on which such statements are made.

Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following:

Actual results and outcomes may differ materially from those expressed or implied in these forward-looking statements. Factors that may cause such a difference include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” below. Except as expressly required by the federal securities laws, we undertake no obligation to update any such factors, or to publicly announce the results of, or changes to any of the forward-looking statements contained herein to reflect future events, developments, changed circumstances, or for any other reason.

Unless otherwise noted, as used herein, the terms “Organicell Regenerative Medicine”, “Organicell”, the “Company”, “we”, “our” and “us” refer to Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc., a Nevada corporation formerly known as Biotech Product Services and Research, Inc., and its subsidiaries consolidated as a combined entity.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS.

Overview

We are engaged in the health care industry, principally focusing on supplying products and services related to the growing field of regenerative anti-aging medicine (“RAAM”). Our goal is to supply newly designed advanced biologically processed cellular and tissue-based products developed from internally-based research and development activities and/or from other state-of-the-art RAAM-related products developed by third parties under exclusive and/or favorable supply arrangements and to provide other related services used in the growing health care field of regenerative medicine (“RAAM Products”). We intend to distribute the RAAM Products and market RAAM-related services to the health care industry and a referral network of doctors and clinics (collectively, the “Providers”).

From November 2016 to February 2018, we began operating our own laboratory facilities to process and distribute RAAM Products developed through trade secrets acquired in connection with the employment of newly hired executives during November 2016 and March 2017. During this time, we also implemented an in-house sales force and made arrangements with newly identified independent distributors to sell our RAAM Products.

As discussed more fully below, during February 2018, we sold or transferred our laboratory facilities and all related assets (“Sale”), including intellectual property rights, to Vera Acquisition LLC, a Utah limited liability company (“Vera”). During August 2018, Vera notified the Company that it was no longer in the business originally acquired in connection with the Sale and that it was no longer able to supply products to the Company under the Organicell Distribution Agreement (“Vera Exit”). As a result of the Vera Exit, the Company is currently relying on short-term supply agreements with other third party manufacturers to provide it with the products it currently distributes.

Background:

RAAM Products:

From July 2015 to October 2016, the Company’s main revenue stream was generated from referral fees and sales of products that were solely obtained through supply arrangements with third party manufacturers. Revenues from these activities during the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016 did not increase as projected primarily due to the Company’s ongoing cash restraints which limited the ability of the Company to attract and retain sales related personnel and the level of advertising and social media marketing efforts that could be deployed towards increasing revenues. In addition, costs charged from the suppliers of the Company’s products were higher than projected due to the Company’s inability to provide certain minimum guaranteed purchase commitments, which further impacted the Company’s ability to attract distributors to supply and market its products, primarily due to the lower commissions that could be offered to the potential distributors as a result of the higher products costs and the Company’s need to achieve minimum gross margins, and the inability for the Company to negotiate terms with these suppliers to provide the Company with private labeling and/or granting of exclusive sales territories, factors important to many distributors. As a result of the above, the Company determined during November 2016 that it would immediately focus on implementing its strategy to develop products internally in order to effectively position itself and compete in the RAAM market, provide the Company with improved margins obtained on the sale of its products, and to increase revenues resulting from the ability to differentiate its products as superior to its competitors combined with leveraging existing marketing programs and strategies aimed to attract distributors and Providers.

In connection with this strategy, during November 2016, the Company announced additions to its executive management team, including Chief Operating Officer, Dr. Bruce Werber (“COO”); Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Ian T. Bothwell (“CFO”); and Chief Science Officer, Dr. Maria Ines Mitrani (“CSO”), who joined Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Albert Mitrani. On March 8, 2017, the Company appointed Mr. Terrell Suddarth (“CTO”) as the Chief Technology Officer. Messrs. Mitrani, Werber, Bothwell, and Suddarth and Ms. Mitrani are collectively referred to as the “Management Team.” The Management Team provided the Company with significant industry, technical and financial related experience as the Company began the launch and expansion of the supply of newly developed innovative amnion placental tissue products.

During January 2017, Anu Life Sciences Inc., a Florida corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“ANU”), announced that it successfully completed several trial production runs of its first amnion placental tissue product (“New Amnio Product”). During February 2017, the Company received satisfactory validation for its first production batch of the New Amnio Product and commenced shipping the New Amnio Product to customers. Since the release of the New Amnio Product, ANU has developed other placental tissue derived products for commercial sale to Providers in the health care industry. ANU’s products developed were sold through ANU’s designated distributor and affiliate, General Surgical Florida Inc., a Florida corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“General Surgical”), under the name “Anu Rheo” and “Vendaje.”

Effective February 5, 2018 (“Closing Date”), Vera, Organicell, ANU and General Surgical, executed an Asset Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement") pursuant to which ANU sold or transferred to Vera their right, title and interest in certain tangible and other assets associated with its manufacturing operations, including, prepaid expenses, raw and finished goods inventory, a long term lease for ANU’s laboratory facility in Sunrise, Florida (including associated security deposits), furniture and equipment, and certain intellectual property rights and General Surgical transferred its rights to certain third-party distribution agreements between General Surgical and distributors of products manufactured by ANU in exchange for a cash payment of $950,000 and execution of a long- term distribution agreement with Organicell (“Organicell Distribution Agreement”) which provided Organicell, or its designees, certain exclusive and non-exclusive rights to distribute future products to be manufactured by Vera, including products that were developed and produced by ANU prior to the Closing Date and additional products that may be developed and produced by Vera in the future. In connection with the Sale, Vera received credit for $100,000 previously paid by it to ANU for prepaid product supply which was not yet delivered to Vera as of the Closing Date. During August 2018, Vera notified the Company that it was no longer in the business originally acquired in connection with the Sale and that it was no longer able to supply products to the Company under the Organicell Distribution Agreement. As a result of the Vera Exit, the Company is currently relying on short-term supply agreements with third party manufacturers to provide it with the products it distributes.

In connection with the Sale, Vera arranged for the employment of the Company’s COO and CTO effective upon the closing of the Sale. In connection with such employment, the COO and CTO each entered into a Separation and General Release Agreement with the Company effective upon the closing of the Sale which provided for their immediate resignation from the Company and its subsidiaries, and the settlement of all obligations of each party to the other pursuant to the respective employment agreements, including the release of all rights the Company may have held in any intellectual property of the COO and CTO and any non-compete restrictions on the COO and CTO. In connection with such releases, each of the COO and CTO agreed to forfeit all warrants previously granted and outstanding (a total of 77,150,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock of the Company), forfeit any and all accrued and unpaid amounts owing under the employment agreements for past due wages, benefits, severance obligations, unreimbursed expenses and any other obligations owing to one another as of the date of the Closing Date in exchange for a grant of 7,500,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company (valued at $0.011 per share, the closing price of the common stock of the Company on the date of the Sale) to each of the COO and CTO.

The Company’s decision to sell the assets comprising the manufacturing operations operated by ANU was made in order to mitigate the substantial ongoing operating risks associated with the operations of the manufacturing facility, including (a) the lack of adequate working capital which prevented the ability of the Company to pay wages to any of its key executives since November 2016, and the looming realization that the services of the key executives would not remain indefinitely without additional funding, (b) the lack of working capital which prevented the ability of the Company to hire additional sales and manufacturing personnel and other critically needed staff and to make required payments to vendors, (c) existing and newly issued FDA guidelines released in November 2017 governing ANU’s manufacturing operations that were projected to require significant additional capital resources to be deployed to satisfactorily meet regulatory requirements within specified deadlines, (d) continuing difficulties to demonstrate to the Company’s current and potential distributors and customers of the Company’s financial stability and ability to remain a going concern and in compliance with FDA guidelines, important considerations of distributors and customers in selecting suppliers for the products which were being manufactured and supplied by ANU, and (e) the concern over the ability to make the upcoming principal and interest payments due on the Company’s convertible promissory notes which were to become due and payable in full on March 29, 2018 or sooner, in the event of default. The convertible promissory notes were secured by all of the Company’s assets and any event of default in the future would have caused a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations.

After the completion of the Sale, the Company remains in the business of selling and distributing regenerative biologic therapies based on amnion placental tissue derived products to doctors and hospitals, but relies on supply arrangements with third-party manufacturers or indirectly from distributors of third-party manufacturers, rather than from products internally manufactured, for the supply of these advanced biologically processed cellular and tissue based products.

Since the Sale was completed, including the departure of several key executives, the Company had been unsuccessful in generating sufficient revenues and, as a result, continued to have a lack of working capital to meet current operating costs, hiring of additional sales personnel, pay past due accounts payable obligations to its vendors, pay past due and/or current salaries to its remaining management or fund potential growth opportunities. Because of such uncertainties, there still existed substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

On April 23, 2018, the Company and Management and Business Associates, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“MBA”), executed a Plan and Agreement of Reorganization (“Reorganization Plan”) whereby the Company agreed to issue to MBA an aggregate of 222,425,073 shares of its common stock of the Company, representing 51% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on fully-diluted basis, for $0.001 per share (or an aggregate of $222,425), in consideration for MBA’s founder and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Manuel Iglesias’ agreement to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of the Company. The Reorganization Plan was effective as of April 13, 2018 (“Effective Date”).

Prior to the execution and effectiveness of the Reorganization Plan, Mr. Iglesias moved from his position as Chief Executive Officer of MBA to a position as Co-Chairman of the Board of Hygea Holdings Corp., a Florida corporation (“Hygea”), a diversified healthcare holding company that owns physician practices, ancillary services companies (e.g., pharmacies, therapies and diagnostic facilities), independent physician associations (“IPAs”), and other medical service entities that provide seamless care to commercial, Medicare and Medicaid patients. As the newly appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Iglesias intends to bring his extensive industry experience and relationships to attract capital and industry leaders to the Company as the Company seeks to stabilize, expand and grow the business into becoming a leading supplier of services, products and therapies for the regenerative health care sector, including expansion into the rapidly growing wellness sector, and to pursue clinical studies and certifications for specific disease states using the expedited FDA program for regulatory approval for regenerative medicine advance therapies (“RMAT”). As part of the Company’s efforts to raise capital and reposition the Company’s image, the Company has recently initiated and/or completed several important corporate governance changes to simplify the Company’s capital structure and to attract investment capital including:

On June 1, 2018, the Company submitted an Issuer Company-Related Notification Form (“June 1 Notification Form”) with the Financial Industry Regulatory Agency (“FINRA”) pursuant to Rule 10b-17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), regarding the Name Change and Reverse Split. However, due to the Company’s delinquency its Exchange Act reports with the SEC by failing to file this Annual Report and its Quarterly Reports for the quarters ended January 31, 2018 and April 30, 2018, FINRA did not announce or effectuate the Name Change or Reverse Split in the marketplace. FINRA has recently informed the Company that as a result of the length of time before the Company expects to file its delinquent Exchange Act reports with the SEC, a new Issuer Company-Related Notification Form will be required to be submitted for approval upon the Company becoming current in its Exchange Act filings. We intend to resubmit an Issuer Company-Related Notification Form with FINRA and we anticipate that FINRA will announce and effectuate the Name Change and Reverse Split in the marketplace at that time.

Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers:

In connection with the new regulations enacted as of November 8, 2016 by the Florida state legislature (“Amendment No. 2”) that permits Florida residents to apply to open Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers (“MMTC”) for defined MMTC licensed activities, the Company entered into a Participation Agreement, effective February 14, 2017 (the “Agreement”), with Mr. Peter Taddeo (“Taddeo”) and Mr. Wayne Rohrbaugh (“Rohrbaugh”), two then non-affiliated accredited investors (collectively, the “Investors”) for the purpose of obtaining a Florida license and operating a business to dispense medical cannabis. Pursuant to the terms of the Participation Agreement, the Company formed and capitalized Mint Organics, Inc., a Florida corporation and a 55% owned subsidiary of the Company (“Mint Organics”), and Mint Organics Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation and a 96% owned subsidiary of Mint Organics (“Mint Organics Florida”), to explore, develop and to provide products and services in connection with the MMTC activities that they are licensed to operate.

Pursuant to Participation Agreement, Messrs. Taddeo and Rohrbaugh each invested $150,000 in the Company in exchange for the issuance to each of Taddeo and Rohrbaugh (a) 150 shares of Series A non-voting convertible preferred stock of Mint Organics (“Mint Series A Preferred Stock”), convertible into a 22.5% equity interest in the common stock of Mint Organics or within 90 days of the one year anniversary of the date of the Participation Agreement (May 14, 2018), into common stock of the Company at a future date based on the value of the Company’s common stock at the time of conversion, and (b) a warrant to acquire up to 150,000 shares of common stock of the Company, exercisable for three years at an exercise price of $0.15 per share. In connection with the Agreement, $150,000 of the proceeds received from the Investors was obligated to be used to fund the operations of Mint Organics, Inc. and/or Mint Organics Florida, Inc. and the remainder was to be used for working capital of the Company.

In connection with the Participation Agreement, on February 28, 2017, Mr. Taddeo was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida and Mr. Rohrbaugh was appointed as the Chief Operating Officer and as a director of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida. Also, on March 8, 2017, Mr. Taddeo was appointed as a member to the Board of Directors of the Company.

The Company initially believed that expanding into the MMTC industry, and being one of the first group of companies to be granted a license to operate within Florida, would provide significant opportunities for increasing overall revenues and growth for the Company. In addition, the growing science and research regarding the regenerative health benefits associated with the use of marijuana had certain synergies with the Company’s current RAAM operations and strategy to become a leading supplier of newly designed advanced biologically processed cellular and tissue based products and services used in the growing health care field of regenerative medicine.

As of October 31, 2017, Mint Organics had not been successful in obtaining a Florida license allowing Mint Organics or Mint Organics Florida to operate a business to dispense medical cannabis. In addition, Mint Organics had exhausted all of its working capital and Organicell was unable to identify additional sources of working capital.

On April 6, 2018, Mr. Taddeo resigned as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and as the Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida. Mr. Taddeo’s resignation was due to his decision to pursue other personal objectives, particularly in light of the ongoing lack of adequate working capital at Mint Organics to demonstrate the ability to fund a reasonable level of future cash compensation to Mr. Taddeo and the additional capital required to sustain future efforts required to successfully pursue obtaining a license to operate cannabis dispensaries. In connection with Mr. Taddeo’s resignation, the Company and Mr. Taddeo entered into settlement agreement in connection with the termination of Mr. Taddeo’s employment agreement and the Company agreed to purchase from Mr. Taddeo his 150 shares of Mint Series A Preferred Stock for an aggregate purchase price of $40,000. Effective May 14, 2018, the conversion rights for the holders of the Mint Series A Preferred Stock (or Class B Common Stock equivalent) to convert into unregistered shares, par value $0.001 per share, of common stock of Organicell had expired.

The Company has been evaluating viable alternatives regarding the future operations of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida. Since the time that the Company began efforts to obtain a Florida license, the state of Florida has granted all of the number of licenses currently authorized to operate dispensaries to other competitors. The Company believes that there are currently many other entities competing to obtain licenses to operate dispensaries and that the limited number of licenses that are expected to be authorized and granted in the future will be to those companies with significantly more working capital and expertise than the Company.

Operating Subsidiaries:

For the year ended October 31, 2017, our RAAM-related operations were being conducted through the following wholly-owned subsidiaries*:

* As described above, the manufacturing operations of ANU were sold during February 2018, and the Company now relies on supply arrangements with third-party manufacturers or indirectly from distributors of third-party manufacturers for the supply of RAAM products that are sold to Providers.

Our MMTC exploratory activities have been conducted through the following the following subsidiaries. As described above, effective April 6, 2018, Mr. Taddeo resigned as CEO of our MMTC subsidiaries. The Company has yet to replace Mr. Taddeo and the Company is evaluating its alternatives regarding the future operations of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida **:

** Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida have issued minority non-voting equity interests.

We also have two wholly-owned subsidiaries that are inactive:

On September 3, 2015, Ethan NY entered into a five-year lease agreement (“Ethan Lease”) for a store located in New York City, New York (“Leased Premises”). During June 2016, Ethan NY exited from its Leased Premises. In connection with the lease exit, Ethan NY is negotiating with the landlord for settlement of past due amounts owing under the Ethan Lease and the release of all other obligations potentially owing under the Ethan Lease. Ethan NY has not made any of the required monthly lease payments since inception of the Ethan Lease. The total amount of minimum lease payments that Ethan NY is obligated to pay pursuant to this 5-year lease (the “Initial Term”) is $586,241 (excluding late fees and interest provided for under the Ethan Lease). All of Ethan NY’s obligations are recourse only to the assets at Ethan NY, except however, certain obligations under the Ethan Lease that were guaranteed by an outside party. Under the terms of the Ethan Lease, the obligations of the Ethan Lease may be mitigated based on the amount of any future rents that are received for the rental of the Leased Premises to other tenants during the Initial Term.

Industry Overview

Health Care Industry Overview:

The traditional health care industry in the United States is predominantly controlled by the rules of the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (“CMS”) (wwws.cms.gov) and commercial health insurance companies. This control limits patients’ access to alternative medical therapies, that recent medical literature demonstrates highly beneficial outcomes in the field of anti-aging and regenerative medicine. Traditional allopathic medicine of health care provided to patients in the United States relies on government and commercial health insurance for payment of the costs associated with their day-to-day health care. Because of this close relationship, physicians must follow government and commercial insurers guidelines in order to stay in the plans and receive reimbursement. Physicians are restricted in their ability to expand the nature of the treatments provided beyond industry practices because of legal ramifications and/or lack of knowledge concerning protocol of cutting edge anti-aging and regenerative medical treatments.

Despite the above, anecdotal and medical literature has shown an increased demand by patients for access to alternative medical therapies and treatments. Patients are seeking these alternatives to traditional allopathic medicine, due to the adverse events associated with traditional pharmaceuticals, risks associated with surgeries, and that traditional medicine and insurers are not addressing wellness or preventive medicine sufficiently. To address a wide variety of aging issues, safe alternatives to pathologies, including access to other treatments and pharmaceuticals and to achieve beneficial “elective” health treatments, we intend utilize the latest regenerative technologies. These alternative pathways to date have had significant restrictions because of regulations imposed by the FDA, other regulatory bodies and insurers due to lack of randomized controlled studies, yet many published case series demonstrate safety and efficacy. Patients and consumers are looking to safe alternatives compared more traditional medicine, including the following:

Currently, patients who desire alternative treatments rely on the following options:

Services and Products

Since the change in control of our Company in June 2015 and change in the Company’s operations in July 2015, we have been engaged in the health care industry, principally focusing on supplying products and services related to the growing field of regenerative anti-aging medicine. Our goal is to supply newly designed advanced biologically processed cellular and tissue based products developed from internally based research and development activities and/or from other state-of-the-art RAAM-related products developed by third parties under exclusive supply arrangements and to provide other related services used in the growing health care field of regenerative medicine (“RAAM Products”). We intend to distribute the RAAM Products and market RAAM-related services to Providers, through our newly established in-house sales force and/or through arrangements with independent distributors.

For the period July 2015 through the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016, our main revenue stream was generated from referral and product sales through our BD Source, General Surgical (fiscal year ended October 31, 2015 only) and Beyond Cells. We also generated revenue from our Ethan NY subsidiary beginning December 2015 until June 2016, when the lease for Ethan NY’s sole store location was terminated.

As of February 2017, we had begun manufacturing our first product of several future expected lines of RAAM-related products that are used to treat a variety of musculoskeletal conditions. Prior to February 2017 and for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016, we obtained supplies of all the RAAM products we sold from third party tissue banks and resold them directly to Providers within our network. Since the Sale in February 2018 through the date of the Vera Exit, we obtained supplies of all the RAAM products we sold through the Organicell Distribution Agreement. Since the Vera Exit, we have obtained supplies of all the RAAM products we sold through supply arrangements with other third party suppliers, with no firm commitments or agreements in place.

Current and Future Operations:

Our current strategy is to achieve the following goals and milestones:

Develop and expand operations to provide for growth of our revenues for the sales and distribution of RAAM related products:

Secure additional working capital:

Evaluate our future alternatives for development of the MMTC business segment:

Enhance Company Corporate Governance:

In connection with the change in control of our Company in June 2015, there was a change in the Company’s management, board of directors and line of business. In connection with the change in control of our Company in April 2018, there was a change in the Company’s management and board of directors.

Since inception, we have incurred net operating losses. Losses have principally occurred as a result of our inability to increase and stabilize revenues which have remained insufficient as a result of a lack of working capital to (a) fund effectively the marketing of our products, (b) the ability to attract and retain needed personnel and/or (c) to fund the expansion into other growth opportunities, including the substantial resources required for research and development and clinical trials. We expect operating losses to continue. Our available funds combined with our current revenue levels will not fund current levels of ongoing general and administrative expenses associated with our operations. We expect to need additional financing to develop, produce, and/or market our products and to cover the general and administrative expenses of the Company.

The Company incurred a net loss of $9,112,519 for the year ended October 31, 2017. In addition, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $11,085,743 at October 31, 2017. The Company had a negative working capital position of $3,599,915 at October 31, 2017. To date, our capital needs have been mostly funded from the private sale of debt and equity to “accredited investors” under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act. See “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Market Overview

The population of the United States and the developed world is getting older and living longer. According to a United States Consensus Bureau’s report, “An Aging World: 2015,” America’s 65-and-over population is projected to nearly double over the next three decades, ballooning from 48 million to 88 million by 2050 and that worldwide, the 65-and-over population will more than double to 1.6 billion by 2050. According to the report, in 2015, 14.9% of the U.S. population was 65 or over and the United States was the 48th oldest country out of 228 countries and areas in the world in 2015. Baby boomers began reaching age 65 in 2011 and by 2050 the older share of the U.S. population will increase to 22.1%.

The world average age of death has increased by 35 years since 1970, with declines in death rates in all age groups, including those aged 60 and older (Source: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation, 2013; Mathers et al., 2015). The leading causes of death are shifting, in part because of increasing longevity. Between 1990 and 2013, the number of deaths from non-communicable diseases (“NCDs”) has increased by 42%; and the largest increases in the proportion of global deaths took place among the population aged 80 and over. An estimated 42.8% of deaths worldwide occur in the population aged 70 and over, with 22.9% in the population aged 80 and over.

Also, according to the Center for Disease Control (“CDC”), “Medical Tourism” (a term commonly used to describe people traveling outside their home country for medical treatment) is a worldwide, multibillion-dollar phenomenon that is expected to grow substantially in the next 5–10 years. Studies have estimated that hundreds of thousands of medical tourists travel from the United States annually and that patients pursue medical care abroad for a variety of reasons, including a desire to receive a procedure or therapy not available in their country of residence. Common categories of procedures that US travelers pursue during medical tourism trips include orthopedic surgery, cosmetic surgery, cardiology (cardiac surgery), oncologic care, and dentistry. Common destinations include Thailand, Mexico, Singapore, India, Malaysia, Cuba, Brazil, Argentina, and Costa Rica.

If we are able to implement our intended business plan, we believe that we will be well situated to address this increased consumer demand for alternative medical treatments.

Marketing and Sales

Currently, we market our RAAM products and services to a network of Providers through in-house, contracted sales personnel and/or from independent distributors. As of October 31, 2017, we had five sales people who marketed our RAAM products and services by using social media outlets, medical conferences and seminars and from development of prior and newly identified Providers and related professional relationships. In addition, we had arrangements with several independent distributors that were marketing and distributing our products. We intend in the future to expand our in-house sales force and independent distributors as our working capital improves, our product line expands and as volumes increase. We also intend to develop and offer ongoing training seminars to provide the best possible information on the latest advances on anti-aging, and regenerative medicine to Providers.

Sources and Availability of Raw Materials and the Names of Principal Suppliers

Currently, we purchase all of our RAAM Products through supply arrangements directly with third-party manufacturers or indirectly from distributors of other third-party manufacturers. Since the date of the Sale and up through the date of the Vera Exit, we purchased all of our RAAM Products through the Organicell Distribution Agreement. Since February 2017 and up through the date of the Sale on February 5, 2018, we internally manufactured our RAAM Products and acquired raw materials and supplies for our RAAM research and development and the manufacturing of our RAAM placental-related products from unaffiliated third-party laboratories pursuant to purchase orders or distribution agreements (“Supply Arrangements”).

In the event any one or more of our current suppliers are unwilling or unable to sell us required products, for any reason, we may not be able to provide replacement products to our customers, or if other supply arrangements can be made, the replacement products and terms may not be as favorable.

Dependence on One or a Few Major Customers

Our RAAM business is not dependent on any one or more customers. We expect that our customer and consumers will be broad based and throughout the United States and worldwide.

Patents, Trademarks, Licenses, Franchises, Concessions, Royalty Agreements or Labor Contracts

The table below sets forth a summary of our intellectual property rights.

Pursuant to our employment agreements with our executives, all work product that is created, prepared, produced, authored, edited, amended, conceived or reduced to practice by each executive individually or jointly with others during the period of their employment by the Company and relating in any way to the business or contemplated business, research or development of the Company (regardless of when or where the Work Product is prepared or whose equipment or other resources is used in preparing the same), as well as any and all rights in and to copyrights, trade secrets, trademarks (and related goodwill), patents and other intellectual property rights therein arising in any jurisdiction throughout the world and all related rights of priority under international conventions with respect thereto, including all pending and future applications and registrations therefor, and continuations, divisions, continuations-in-part, reissues, extensions and renewals thereof (collectively, "Intellectual Property Rights"), the sole and exclusive property of the Company. All of the Work Product consisting of copyrightable subject matter shall be deemed "work made for hire" as defined in 17 U.S.C. § 101 and such copyrights are therefore owned by the Company or if not applicable, deemed to be irrevocably assigned to the Company, for no additional consideration. The Intellectual Property Rights in any “Pre-existing Materials” included contained in the Work Product shall be retained by the executive but the executive shall be deemed to have granted to the Company an irrevocable, worldwide, unlimited, royalty-free license to use, publish, reproduce, display, distribute copies of, and prepare derivative works based upon, such Pre-Existing Materials and derivative works thereof. The Company may not assign, transfer and sublicense such rights to others without executive’s consent, other than to a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The executive shall provide written notice to the Company’s Chief Executive Officer therein notifying the Company new intellectual property including the Pre-Existing Materials.

In connection with Sale, Dr. Bruce Werber and Mr. Terrell Suddarth, our Chief Operating Officer and Chief Technology Officer, respectively, each entered into a Separation and General Release Agreement with the Company effective upon the closing of the Sale which provided for the immediate resignation of Dr. Werber and Mr. Suddarth of all their respective executive and Board of Director positions held with the Company and/or any of the Company’s subsidiaries, and termination and settlement of all obligations of each party to the other pursuant to the respective employment agreements, including the release of all rights the Company may have held in any intellectual property of Dr. Werber and/or Mr. Suddarth and any non-compete restrictions on Dr. Werber and Mr. Suddarth. See Note 4 to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements as of October 31, 2017.

Competition

The regenerative medicine field is highly competitive and subject to rapid technological change and regulation. Companies compete on the basis of product efficacy, pricing, and ease of handling/logistics. A critically important factor for growth in the US market is third-party reimbursement, which is difficult to obtain, it can be time-consuming and expensive. We expect that it will take some time before RAAM products will be widely accepted under health insurance coverage. In addition, growth of this industry is expected to expand as additional research and development into the benefits of regenerative products and specific products becomes more widely accepted as a result of FDA mandated or optional clinical trials are performed by industry stakeholders.

We intend to perform clinical trials for our RAAM Products for the purpose of obtaining biologics license status from the FDA to provide us with advantages over our competitors, including acceleration for acceptance of our products in traditional insurance plans, compliance with FDA regulations and to provide our customers with superior education and support of the benefits of our products. Initially we are positioning ourselves as a cash based health care alternative for consumers that can provide higher levels of improvement, that is not available from traditional allopathic medicine at this time.

The Company competes in multiple areas of clinical treatment where regenerative biomaterials may be employed to modulate inflammation, enhance healing and reduce scar tissue formation: advanced wound care treatment, spine, orthopedic, surgery and sports medicine.

The primary competitive products in this space include other amniotic membrane allografts, tissue-engineered living skin equivalents, and porcine- or bovine-derived collagen matrix products, cadaveric engineered bone grafts, tendon and fascial grafts among others. Our competitors include MiMedix Group, Inc., Organogenesis Inc., TissueTech (“Amniox”), Osiris, and BioD (“dermaSciences”). Additionally, there are a variety of accredited bone and soft tissue banks that we will be competing against.

As stated previously, the demand for RAAM products is very high and expected to grow with the growing baby boomer generation getting older, the increase in patients desiring to seek health care options outside of traditional therapies, the growing trend in the desire of individuals to remain active longer in life and the ongoing rise in health care costs which RAAM products may provide a more efficient and economical alternative for certain conditions.

Government Regulation

The Company’s operations are subject to FDA regulations in connection with the sales and distribution of its RAAM products, the Company’s reliance on supply agreements with manufacturers that are required to comply with FDA regulations, the Company’s reliance on third party distributors for the supply of RAAM products and/or the Company’s intended objectives to conduct research and development and clinical trials of RAAM products. We anticipate these regulations will be heavily enforced and subject to more restrictive regulations by the FDA in the future. A summary of the current FDA regulations is set forth below:

FDA Premarket Clearance and Approval Requirements

Tissue Products

The products that are sold by the Company are derived from human tissue and currently manufactured and processed by third party manufacturers. As discussed below, some tissue-based products are regulated solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act as human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps, which do not require premarket clearance or approval by the FDA. Other tissue products are regulated as biologics and, in order to be lawfully marketed in the United States, require an FDA-approved BLA.

The FDA is continually changing and formulating new guidelines for this industry. In addition, the FDA has published some additional draft guidelines related to this industry and the ultimate form of the regulations are not yet known.

Products Regulated as HCT/Ps

The FDA has specific regulations governing human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. An HCT/P is a product containing or consisting of human cells or tissue intended for transplantation into a human patient. HCT/Ps that meet the criteria for regulation solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (so-called “361 HCT/Ps”) are not subject to approval requirements and they are subject to post-market regulatory requirements.

To be a 361 HCT/P, a product generally should meet following criteria:

Products Regulated as Biologics- The BLA Pathway

The typical steps for obtaining FDA approval of a BLA to market a biologic product in the U.S. include:

Generally, clinical trials are conducted in three phases:

The process of obtaining an approved BLA requires the expenditure of substantial time, effort and financial resources and may take years to complete.

FDA Post-Market Regulation

Tissue processors are required to register as an establishment with the FDA. We intend on becoming a registered establishment, accredited by the American Association of Tissue Banks (“AATB”) for the storage and distribution of tissue products that we purchase directly or indirectly from third party manufacturers. Once we are registered we will be required to comply with regulations, including those regulations regarding storage, controls, access, labeling, record keeping, security, processes, compliance with established Good Tissue Practices, and documentation associated with the sale of our products by our customers to their patients. Our facilities will be subject to periodic inspections to assess our records and determination of our compliance with the regulations.

Products covered by a BLA, 510(k) clearance, or a PMA are subject to numerous additional regulatory requirements, which include, among others, compliance with cGMP, which imposes certain procedural, substantive and record keeping requirements, labeling regulations, the FDA’s general prohibition against promoting products for unapproved or “off-label” uses, and additional adverse event reporting.

Other Regulation Specific to Tissue Products

The AATB, has issued operating standards for tissue banking, whether manufacturing and/or storing products as a distributor of manufactured products by third parties. Compliance with these standards is a requirement in order to become a licensed tissue bank.

21st Century Cures Act

During December 2016, President Obama signed the 21st Century Cures Act (the “Act”) into law. The Act includes many provisions that aim to speed up the process of bringing new drugs and devices to market. One of the Act’s most significant amendments to the Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act will allow the FDA to grant accelerated approval to regenerative medicine products, while also providing the agency with wide discretion on creating new approaches to regenerative medicine. This legislative development is the result of increased pressure from patients and other stakeholders to move regenerative medicine advancements more quickly from the lab into the clinic.

Specifically, the new accelerated approval pathway authorized by the Act allows certain regenerative medicine products to be designated as “regenerative advanced therapy” and become eligible for priority review by FDA. To qualify for this pathway, the product must be aimed at a serious disease and have the potential to deal with currently unmet medical needs. It must also meet the Act’s new definition of a regenerative advanced therapy, which is defined as “cell therapy, therapeutic tissue engineering products, human cell and tissue products, and combination products using any such therapies or products, except for those regulated solely under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act.” This broad definition would seem to encompass the majority of regenerative medicine products known to be currently in the development stages.

As with the existing accelerated approval pathway for drugs and biologics, this new regulatory pathway would allow a regenerative medicine product to be approved for marketing based on surrogate or intermediate clinical trial endpoints rather than longer term clinical outcomes. The use of such endpoints can decrease the number, duration, and complexity of clinical trials that are needed to prove a longer-term outcome. Subsequently, a sponsor would have to conduct confirmatory clinical trials to ensure that the surrogate or intermediate endpoint was in fact predictive of patients’ clinical response to the product, otherwise the accelerated approval could be withdrawn.

The Act also requires the FDA to work with the National Institute of Standards and Technology (“NIST”) and other stakeholders to develop standards and consensus definitions for regenerative medicine products. Such standards are expected to play a large role in advancing this nascent industry by allowing companies to rely on FDA-recognized standards, rather than creating and validating their own as is the case today. 

The Act attempts to create a research network and a public-private partnership to assist developers in generating definitive evidence about whether their proposed therapies indeed provide clinical benefits that are hoped for. The Act also requires the FDA to track and report the number and type of applications filed for regenerative medicine products, including the number of products approved through the new accelerated approval pathway. The law also includes provisions that require the FDA to publish guidance on how it will design and implement an approval process for regenerative medicine devices.

Recently Announced November 2017 FDA Guidelines:

In November 2017, the FDA released four guidance documents (two final, two draft) in an effort to implement a “comprehensive policy framework” for existing laws and regulations governing regenerative medicine products, including human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (“HCT/Ps”). These guidance documents build upon the previous regulatory framework for these products, which was completed in 2005. A guidance document cannot alter a regulation, but can clarify how the FDA intends to enforce the regulation. The Comprehensive regenerative medicine policy framework intends to spur innovation, efficient access to potentially transformative products, while ensuring safety & efficacy.

The framework builds upon the FDA’s existing risk-based regulatory approach to more clearly describe what products are regulated as drugs, devices, and/or biological products. Further, two of the guidance documents propose an efficient, science-based process for helping to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these therapies, while supporting development in this area. The suite of guidance documents also defines a risk-based framework for how the FDA intends to focus its enforcement actions against those products that raise potential significant safety concerns. This modern framework is intended to balance the agency’s commitment to safety with mechanisms to drive further advances in regenerative medicine so innovators can bring new, effective therapies to patients as quickly and safely as possible. The policy also delivers on important provisions of the Act.

New Final Guidance Documents

The two final guidance documents clarify the FDA’s interpretation of the risk-based criteria manufacturers use to determine whether a product is subject to the FDA’s premarket review.

The first guidance provides greater clarity around when cell and tissue-based products would be excepted from the established regulations if they are removed from and implanted into the same individual within the same surgical procedure and remain in their original form. The second final guidance helps stakeholders better understand how existing regulatory criteria apply to their products by clarifying how the agency interprets the existing regulatory definitions “minimal manipulation” and “homologous use.” As this field advances, the FDA has noted that there are a growing number of regenerative medicine products subject to FDA premarket authorization. These guidance documents will help explain how the FDA will provide a risk-based framework for its oversight. The policy framework defines how the FDA intends to take action against unsafe products while facilitating continued innovation of promising technologies.

To accomplish this goal, the guidance document has clarified the FDA’s view of “minimal manipulation” and “homologous use.” These are two concepts that are defined in current regulation to establish the legal threshold for when a product is subject to the FDA’s premarket approval requirements. By further clarifying these terms in the final guidance, the FDA is applying a modern framework for its oversight.

FDA regulations at 21 C.F.R. Part 1271, previous draft guidance documents, and untitled letters establish the agency’s approach to regulating HCT/Ps. Some HCT/Ps are exempt from premarket approval and are subject to regulation solely under section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (“PHS Act”) (so-called “361 HCT/Ps”) whereas others require premarket approval (i.e., as a drug, device, or biologic) (so-called “351 HCT/Ps”). Both 361 HCT/Ps and 351 HCT/Ps are subject to FDA requirements (at Part 1271) for registration and listing, donor-eligibility, current good tissue practices, and other requirements intended to prevent transmission of communicable diseases. Those that are the subject of the “same surgical procedure” exception – are exempt from both premarket approval requirements and the requirements of Part 1271. This regime is outlined in a flow chart, which is one of the few new features of the final guidance documents and is presented below:

Enforcement Discretion

Under the new policy, in order to allow manufacturers of products time to comply with the requirements, for the first 36 months following the issuance of the final guidance document the FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for certain products that are subject to the FDA’s premarket review under the existing regulations, but are not currently meeting these requirements. The FDA does not intend to exercise such enforcement discretion for those products that pose a potential significant safety concern. Going forward, the FDA will apply a risk-based approach to enforcement, taking into account how products are being administered as well as the diseases and conditions for which they are being used. This risk-based approach allows product manufacturers time to engage with the FDA, as to determine if they need to submit a marketing authorization application and, if so, submit their application to the FDA for approval.

Although the FDA has not changed its basic approach to regulating HCT/Ps, the FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for 36 months with regard to 351 HCT/Ps requiring premarket approval. The guidance states that, in order to “give manufacturers time to determine if they need to submit an IND or marketing application in light of this guidance,” the FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion (i.e., the Agency may permit marketing without an approved marketing application) if the HCT/P “is intended for autologous use and its use does not raise reported safety concerns or potential significant safety concerns.” 

The FDA has indicated it intends to focus enforcement actions on “products with higher risk,” taking into account factors such as non-autologous (allogeneic) use, the route of administration, the site of administration, and whether the product is intended for homologous or non-homologous use. For example, HCT/Ps administered via intravenous injection or infusion, aerosol inhalation, intraocular injection, or injection or infusion into the central nervous system, will be prioritized over HCT/Ps administered by intradermal, subcutaneous, or intra-articular injection. Similarly, HCT/Ps intended for non-homologous use, particularly those intended to treat serious or life-threatening conditions, “are more likely to raise significant safety concerns than HCT/Ps intended for homologous use”.

The Company believes that the new regulatory restrictions being implemented by the FDA are intended to assure that all parties involved in the chain of gathering, processing, distributing and/or administrating RAAM related products have met the required standards to assure that the manufacturing, marketing the administration of the RAAM regulated products are not misleading and are performed in a safe and ethical manner and in accordance with the “objective intent” of the manufacturer.

New Draft Guidance Documents

The two draft guidances provide important information to help spur development and access to innovative regenerative therapies. The first draft guidance, which builds off the regenerative medicine provisions in the Act, addresses how the FDA intends to simplify and streamline its application of the regulatory requirements for devices used in the recovery, isolation, and delivery of regenerative medicine advanced therapies, including combination products. The guidance specifies that devices intended for use with a specific RMAT may, together with the RMAT, be considered to comprise a combination product.

The second draft guidance describes the expedited programs that may be available to sponsors of regenerative medicine therapies, including the new Regenerative Medicine Advanced Therapy (“RMAT”) designation created by the 21st Century Cures Act, Priority Review, and Accelerated Approval. In addition, the guidance describes the regenerative medicine therapies that may be eligible for RMAT designation – including cell therapies, therapeutic tissue engineering products, human cell and tissue products, and combination products using any such therapies or products, as well as gene therapies that lead to a durable modification of cells or tissues (including genetically modified cells).

Fraud, Abuse and False Claims

We are directly and indirectly subject to various federal and state laws governing relationships with healthcare providers and pertaining to healthcare fraud and abuse, including anti-kickback laws. In particular, the federal Anti-Kickback Statute prohibits persons from knowingly and willfully soliciting, offering, receiving or providing remuneration, directly or indirectly, in exchange for or to induce either the referral of an individual, or the furnishing, arranging for or recommending a good or service for which payment may be made in whole or part under federal healthcare programs, such as the Medicare and Medicaid programs. (See 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7b). Penalties for violations include criminal penalties and civil sanctions such as fines, imprisonment and possible exclusion from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal healthcare programs. The Anti-Kickback Statute is broad and prohibits many arrangements and practices that are lawful in businesses outside of the healthcare industry. In implementing the statute, the Office of Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (“OIG”) has issued a series of regulations, known as the “safe harbors.”  These safe harbors set forth provisions that, if all their applicable requirements are met, will assure healthcare providers and other parties that they will not be prosecuted under the Anti-Kickback Statute.

AdvaMed has established guidelines and protocols for medical device manufacturers in their relationships with healthcare professionals on matters including research and development, product training and education, grants and charitable contributions, support of third-party educational conferences, and consulting arrangements. Adoption of the AdvaMed Code by a medical device manufacturer is voluntary, and while the OIG and other federal and state healthcare regulatory agencies encourage its adoption and may look to the AdvaMed Code, they do not view adoption of the AdvaMed Code as proof of compliance with applicable laws. We have incorporated the principles of the AdvaMed Code in our standard operating procedures, sales force training programs, and relationships with health care professionals.

Manufacturing (Processing)

During November 2016, we opened our first placental tissue bank processing laboratory in Miami, Florida. On June 20, 2017, we relocated our placental tissue bank processing laboratory to a larger “good manufacturing practice” (“GMP”) laboratory in Sunrise, Florida. During February 2018, we sold our manufacturing assets to a third party in connection with the Sale.

Currently the products we sell to our customers are delivered directly to them by the manufacturer of the products. We intend on becoming a registered establishment, accredited by the American Association of Tissue Banks (“AATB”) for the storage and distribution of tissue products that we purchase directly or indirectly from third party manufacturers.

Our facilities are expected to be subject to periodic unannounced inspections by regulatory authorities based on the activities we may be engaged, and may undergo compliance inspections conducted by the FDA and corresponding state and foreign agencies based on our operations. We intend to seek American Association Blood Banks (“AABB”) or AATB accreditation in connection with the storage of products we intend to distribute.

Placental Donation Program

During the time we operated our laboratory facilities, we purchased placental tissue that was used in our minimally manipulated 361 compliant process to produce allografts to be used in regenerative therapy specialties. During this time, we were able to procure an adequate supply of tissue to meet our anticipated demand.

Environmental Laws

As a result of the Sale in February 2018, we no longer process or directly handle biomedical materials. We currently arrange for the shipments of the products sold to our customers to be delivered directly from the product manufacturers. As a result of the above, we currently do not expect to have exposure for environmental related wastes in connection with our operations. In the future we intend to obtain a tissue bank license to store and distribute products from our facilities. Upon such time that we are performing these operations, if at all, we may become exposed to biomedical materials and related wastes. 

If we receive and/or generate any wastes that are required to be disposed, we plan on contracting with third parties for the transport, treatment, and disposal of the waste that we obtain and at all times plan on being compliant with applicable laws and regulations promulgated by the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and similar state agencies.

Employees

At October 31, 2017, we had eight full-time employees and no part-time employees. We also engaged one other person as a consultant, assisting with sales. During the year ended October 31, 2017, we also engaged an outside consultant for accounting and bookkeeping services as well as other consultants that assisted with various administrative activities. In connection with the Sale, three of our full-time employees and one independent sales consultant resigned. In addition, during April 2018, one employee at Mint Organics also resigned. In connection with the Reorganization Plan in April 2018, we appointed a new employee to be our Chief Executive Officer and during June 2018 hired an additional employee for our sales department. During October 2018, the Company’s bookkeeper resigned. There are no collective bargaining agreements. From time to time, the Company engages independent contractors for sales and administration activities.

Dividend Policy

We have never paid or declared dividends on our securities. The payment of cash dividends, if any, in the future is within the discretion of our Board and will depend upon our earnings, our capital requirements, financial condition and other relevant factors. We do not expect to pay dividends for the foreseeable future, and intend to retain future earnings, if any, towards the use in our business and growth strategies.

Corporate History and Change in Control

The Company was incorporated in the state of Nevada on August 9, 2011 as Bespoke Tricycles Inc. for the purpose of designing, manufacturing, and selling vending tricycles for commercial customers. On August 10, 2011, the Company purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of Bespoke Tricycles, Ltd., a company organized under the laws of England and Wales, from John Goodhew, the Company’s then sole officer and director, in exchange for shares of our common stock. Also on August 10, 2011, the Company purchased all of the assets from Mr. Goodhew related to its business, including notably a UK patent application for our foldable/collapsible tricycle. Through its then wholly-owned subsidiary, Bespoke Tricycles, Ltd., the Company manufactured vending tricycles.

On June 24, 2015, Albert Mitrani, our Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and President, purchased an aggregate of 135,000,000 shares of common stock of Bespoke Tricycles, Inc. from John Goodhew, representing approximately 87.8% of the then issued and outstanding shares of the Company on a fully-diluted basis and constituting a change in control of the Company. The transaction was in accordance with the terms and provisions of the stock purchase agreement, dated May 29, 2015 (“Mitrani Purchase Agreement”), by and among the Company, Mr. Mitrani and Mr. Goodhew. The purchase price of $40,000 for the shares was paid by Mr. Mitrani to Mr. Goodhew on June 24, 2016. In connection with the execution and delivery of the Mitrani Purchase Agreement, as of May 29, 2015, Mr. Goodhew resigned as the sole officer of the Company and appointed Albert Mitrani to the Board of Directors and as the sole officer of the Company. Mr. Goodhew remained on the Board of Directors of the Company.

On August 6, 2015, Mr. Mitrani returned 60,120,000 shares of common stock of the Company to the Company for cancellation. As a result, Mr. Mitrani’s ownership was 74,880,000 shares of common stock of the Company, representing approximately 80% of the 93,600,000 shares of common stock issued and outstanding on such date.

On September 1, 2015, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of Nevada therein changing its name to Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc. and increasing the amount of authorized common stock from 90 million (90,000,000) shares to 250 million (250,000,000) shares. The amount authorized “blank check” preferred stock remained 10 million (10,000,000) and the par value of the common stock and preferred stock remained $0.001 per share.

On September 17, 2015, the Company completed an eighteen-for-one (18:1) forward split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common stock. Unless otherwise noted, the disclosure in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including the consolidated audited financial statements contained herein, reflect a retroactive adjustment for the forward stock split. The forward stock split had no effect on the authorized capital stock of the Company.

On November 1, 2016, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation with the Secretary of State of Nevada therein designating out of the 10,000,000 authorized shares of Preferred Stock, a class of Preferred Stock as “Series A Non-Convertible Preferred Stock” consisting of 100 shares (the “ Series A Certificate of Designation “). On March 2, 2017, the Company filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada an amendment to increase the number of shares provided for in the Series A Certificate of Designation from 100 shares to 400 shares. Generally, the outstanding shares of Series A Non-Convertible Preferred Stock shall vote together with the shares of common stock and other voting securities of the Company as a single class and, regardless of the number of shares of Series A Non-Convertible Preferred Stock outstanding, and as long as at least one share of Series A Non-Convertible Preferred Stock is outstanding, such shares shall represent eighty percent (80%) of all votes entitled to be voted at any annual or special meeting of stockholders of the Company or action by written consent of stockholders. Each outstanding share of the Series A Non-Convertible Preferred Stock shall represent its proportionate share of the 80% which is allocated to the outstanding shares of Series A Non-Convertible Preferred Stock.

On November 1, 2016, the Company filed a Certificate of Designation with the Secretary of State of Nevada therein designating out of the 10,000,000 authorized shares of Preferred Stock, a class of Preferred Stock as “Series B Convertible Preferred Stock” consisting of 1,000,000 shares (“Series B Certificate of Designation”). Each holder of Series B Preferred Stock shall have the right, at such holder’s option, at any time or from time to time from and after the day immediately following the date the Series B Preferred Stock is first issued, to convert each share of Series B Preferred Stock into 20 fully-paid and non-assessable shares of common stock.

On June 6, 2017, pursuant to the Nevada Revised Statutes and the Bylaws of the Company, the Board of Directors of the Company and the stockholders holding the Company’s outstanding Series A Preferred Stock, having the voting equivalency of 80% of the outstanding capital stock, approved the filing of an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company to increase the authorized amount of common stock from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000, without changing the par value of the common stock or authorized number and par value of “blank check” Preferred Stock. On June 19, 2017, the Company filed a Definitive 14C with the SEC regarding the corporate action. On June 22, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effectuate the corporate action on July 10, 2017.

On April 23, 2018, in connection with the Reorganization Plan, the Company issued MBA an aggregate of 222,425,073 shares of common stock of the Company, representing a 51% fully diluted equity interest in the Company at a price of $0.001 per share (an aggregate value of $222,425). The foregoing issuance resulted in a change in control of the Company.

On May 8, 2018, the Company received the written consent of the Board of Directors of the Company (“Board”) and, on May 9, 2018, the written consent of the shareholders holding a majority in interest of the voting power of the Company (86.9%) adopting resolutions which authorized the Company to amend its Articles of Incorporation to change the name of the Company from "Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc." to “Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc.” The Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Nevada Secretary of State and, effective June 20, 2018, the Company’s name has been changed to Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc.

On May 8, 2018, the Board adopted resolutions to (i) amend its Articles of Incorporation to reduce the number of authorized shares of common stock from 750,000,000 to 250,000,000 and (ii) reverse split the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock on a ratio of seventeen (17) current shares for one (1) share of new shares. On May 9, 2018, shareholders holding a majority in interest of the voting power of the Company (86.9%) approved the amendment and the reverse stock split. On June 1, 2018, the Company filed a Company-Related Action Notification with FINRA (“Notification Form”) to provide notice of certain proposed actions by the Company, including the amendment and reverse stock split. On June 18, 2018, the Company filed a Certificate of Correction with the Secretary of State of Nevada to reverse the amendments related to the Reverse Split, and will file a new Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effectuate the Reverse Split once the Reverse Split has been effectuated in the marketplace by FINRA. FINRA has recently informed the Company that it will not approve and process announcements for these Company-Related Actions until the Company’s delinquencies in its Exchange Act reports with the SEC have been fully resolved and a new Notification Form is submitted. At such time as FINRA processes the announcements, the Company will effect the reverse split of its common stock and amend its Articles to reduce its authorized common stock.

On June 6, 2018, the Company approved resolutions to cancel and terminate the Series A Preferred Stock designation and filed a certificate of withdrawal with the State of Nevada on June 14, 2018 thereby withdrawing and terminating the designation of the Series A Preferred Stock. As a result of the aforementioned actions, as of June 14, 2018, there were no shares of Series A Preferred Stock authorized or outstanding.

On June 6, 2018, the Company approved resolutions to cancel and terminate the Series B Preferred Stock designations and filed a certificate of withdrawal with the State of Nevada on June 14, 2018 thereby withdrawing and terminating the designation of the Series B Preferred Stock. As a result of the aforementioned actions, as of June 14, 2018, there were no shares of Series B Preferred Stock authorized or outstanding.

Discontinued Operations

On September 3, 2015, Ethan NY entered into a five-year lease agreement (“Ethan Lease”) for a store located in New York City, New York (“Leased Premises”). The Ethan Lease commenced on October 1, 2015. During June 2016, Ethan NY exited from its Leased Premises. Ethan NY did not make any of the required minimum monthly lease payments as required. During August 2016, Ethan NY received confirmation that the Leased Premises had been leased to another tenant. As a result of the termination of the Ethan Lease, the Company ceased its business of selling clothing and accessories through a retail store in New York City.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.

AN INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES IS HIGHLY SPECULATIVE AND INVOLVES A HIGH DEGREE OF RISK. WE FACE A VARIETY OF RISKS THAT MAY AFFECT OUR OPERATIONS OR FINANCIAL RESULTS AND MANY OF THOSE RISKS ARE DRIVEN BY FACTORS THAT WE CANNOT CONTROL OR PREDICT. BEFORE INVESTING IN THE SECURITIES YOU SHOULD CAREFULLY CONSIDER THE FOLLOWING RISKS, TOGETHER WITH THE FINANCIAL AND OTHER INFORMATION CONTAINED IN THIS REPORT. IF ANY OF THE FOLLOWING RISKS ACTUALLY OCCURS, OUR BUSINESS, PROSPECTS, FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS COULD BE MATERIALLY ADVERSELY AFFECTED. IN THAT CASE, THE TRADING PRICE OF OUR COMMON STOCK WOULD LIKELY DECLINE AND YOU MAY LOSE ALL OR A PART OF YOUR INVESTMENT. ONLY THOSE INVESTORS WHO CAN BEAR THE RISK OF LOSS OF THEIR ENTIRE INVESTMENT SHOULD CONSIDER AN INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES.

This Annual Report contains certain statements relating to future events or the future financial performance of our Company. Prospective investors are cautioned that such statements are only predictions and involve risks and uncertainties, and that actual events or results may differ materially. In evaluating such statements, prospective investors should specifically consider the various factors identified in this Annual Report, including the matters set forth below, which could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by such forward-looking statements.

If any of the following or other risks materialize, the Company’s business, financial condition, and results of operations could be materially adversely affected which, in turn, could adversely impact the value of our securities. In such a case, investors in our securities could lose all or part of their investment.

Prospective investors should consider carefully whether an investment in the Company is suitable for them in light of the information contained in this Report and the financial resources available to them. The risks described below do not purport to be all the risks to which the Company could be exposed. This section is a summary of certain risks and is not set out in any particular order of priority. They are the risks that we presently believe are material to the operations of the Company. Additional risks of which we are not presently aware or which we presently deem immaterial may also impair the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.

Risks Related to Our Business

We have limited cash on hand and there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern.

The Company incurred a net loss of $9,112,519 for the year ended October 31, 2017. In addition, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $11,085,743 at October 31, 2017 and had a negative working capital position of $3,599,915 at October 31, 2017. In their report for the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, our auditors have expressed that there is substantial doubt as to our ability to continue as a going concern. We have incurred operating losses since our formation and expect to incur substantial losses and negative operating cash flows for the foreseeable future and may never become profitable. We also expect to continue to incur significant operating and capital expenditures for the next several years and anticipate that our expenses will increase substantially in the foreseeable future. We also expect to experience negative cash flow for the foreseeable future as we fund our operating losses and capital expenditures. As a result, we will need to generate significant revenues in order to achieve and maintain profitability. We may not be able to generate these revenues or achieve profitability in the future. Our failure to achieve or maintain profitability could negatively impact the value of our common stock.

We have a limited operating history upon which investors can evaluate our future prospects.

In connection with the change in control of our Company in June 2015, there was a change in the Company’s management, board of directors and line of business. Therefore, we have limited operating history upon which an evaluation of our current business plan or performance and prospects can be made. The business and prospects of the Company must be considered in the light of the potential problems, delays, uncertainties and complications encountered in connection with a newly established business. The risks include, but are not limited to, the possibility that we will not be able to develop or identify functional and scalable products and services, or that although functional and scalable, our products and services will not be economical to market; that our competitors hold proprietary rights that preclude us from marketing such products; that our competitors market a superior or equivalent product; that we are not able to upgrade and enhance our technologies and products to accommodate new features and expanded service offerings; or the failure to receive necessary regulatory clearances for our products. To successfully introduce and market our products at a profit, we must establish brand name recognition and competitive advantages for our products. There are no assurances that the Company can successfully address these challenges. If it is unsuccessful, the Company and its business, financial condition and operating results could be materially and adversely affected.

Given the limited operating history, management has little basis on which to forecast future demand for our products from our existing customer base, much less new customers. The current and future expense levels of the Company are based largely on estimates of planned operations and future revenues rather than experience. It is difficult to accurately forecast future revenues because the business of the Company is new and its market has not been developed. If the forecasts for the Company prove incorrect, the business, operating results and financial condition of the Company will be materially and adversely affected. Moreover, the Company may be unable to adjust its spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unanticipated reduction in revenue. As a result, any significant reduction in revenues would immediately and adversely affect the business, financial condition and operating results of the Company.

We depend upon our officers and key personnel, the loss of which could seriously harm our business.

Our operating performance is substantially dependent on the continued services of our executive officers and key employees, in particular, Manuel Iglesias, our new Chief Executive Officer; Albert Mitrani, our President; and Ian T. Bothwell, our Chief Financial Officer. The unexpected loss of the services of any of them could have a material adverse effect on our business, operations, financial condition and operating results, as well as the value of our common stock.

We may not be able to compete successfully with current and future competitors.

We have many potential competitors in the regenerative medicine industry and the cannabis industry. We will compete, in our current and proposed businesses, with other established companies, most of which have far greater marketing and financial resources and experience than we do. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to penetrate our intended markets and be able to compete profitably, if at all. In addition to established competitors, there are moderate obstacles for competitors to enter this market, but they are not insurmountable if they have the financial resources and intellectual team. Effective competition could result in price reductions, reduced margins or have other negative implications, any of which could adversely affect our business and chances for success. Competition is likely to increase significantly as new companies enter the market and current competitors expand their services. Many of these potential competitors are likely to enjoy substantial competitive advantages, including, but not limited to, larger staffs, greater name recognition, larger and established customer bases and substantially greater financial, marketing, technical and other resources. To be competitive, we must respond promptly and effectively to industry dynamics, evolving standards and competitors’ innovations by continuing to enhance our services and sales and marketing channels. Any pricing pressures, reduced margins or loss of market share resulting from increased competition, or our failure to compete effectively, could fatally damage our business and chances for success.

We rely on non-exclusive supply arrangements with third party manufacturers or distributors of products from third party manufacturers to obtain the supply of products we currently plan to sell.

If our current supply arrangements under supply agreements with third party manufacturers or distributors of products from third party manufacturers are disrupted for any reason, we may not be able to provide products to our customers, or if other supply arrangements can be made, the products and terms may not be as favorable, and that will adversely impact our operations and profitability.

If we do not continually update our products and/or services, they may become obsolete and we may not be able to compete with other companies.

We cannot assure you that we will be able to keep pace with technological advances, or that our current suppliers will be able to keep pace with technological advances and as such, our products and/or services may become obsolete. We cannot assure you that competitors will not develop related or similar services and offer them before we do, or do so more successfully, or that they will not develop services and products more effective than any that we and/or our suppliers have or are intending to develop. In addition, although we may be able to identify new suppliers that can provide more effective services and products to be more competitive, we may not be able to arrange satisfactory arrangements in a timely manner, if at all. If that happens, our business, prospects, results of operations and financial condition will be materially adversely affected.

We enter into supply agreements for the products we sell, which make us vulnerable to the ability of such suppliers to remain current and innovative in their product offerings, to timely process and supply the products we desire to purchase, and to remain compliant with the current and changing regulatory environment. If our product suppliers are not successful in managing these responsibilities, it will have an adverse effect on our operations and profitability.

Our current supply arrangements for the products we sell provide for the supply and pricing for those products. There can be no assurance that our suppliers will continue to produce the products that we currently purchase under our existing arrangements, that our suppliers will be able to comply with the required FDA regulations for the manufacturing of such products, that our suppliers will continue to develop technology associated with their manufactured products to remain competitive with other companies, or that our suppliers will remain a going concern in the future. If any of our suppliers were to cause a disruption in our ability to obtain products as desired and expected and/or we are not provided advance notice of such potential disruption, we may not be able to timely identify and replace our current suppliers, if at all, and as a result, we may not be able to provide products to our customers, which will have an adverse impact to our operations.

In the event of default under our outstanding indebtedness, or we are unable to pay other obligations and accounts payable when due, our creditors may file a creditors petition or force us to involuntary bankruptcy which may have an adverse impact on our business.

The Company had a negative working capital position of $3,599,915 at October 31, 2017. The Company’s efforts to establish a stabilized source of sufficient revenues to cover operating costs has yet to be achieved and ultimately may prove to be unsuccessful unless additional sources of working capital through operations or debt and/or equity financings are realized. Mint Organics did not repay the $60,000 promissory note on the required due date and the loan is still outstanding. Management anticipates that the Company will remain dependent, for the near future, on additional investment capital to fund ongoing operating expenses. As a result of the Sale, the Company does not have any assets to pledge for the purpose of borrowing additional capital. In addition, the Company relies on short term supply agreements to obtain the supply of the products it currently sells and distributes to its customers. The Company’s current market capitalization and common stock liquidity will hinder its ability to raise equity proceeds to implement its business plan and could adversely affect the value of our securities, including the common stock.

We may be required to borrow funds in the future.

If the Company incurs indebtedness, a portion of its cash flow will have to be dedicated to the payment of principal and interest on such indebtedness. Typical loan agreements also might contain restrictive covenants, which may impair the Company’s operating flexibility. Such loan agreements would also provide for default under certain circumstances, such as failure to meet certain financial covenants. A default under a loan agreement could result in the loan becoming immediately due and payable and, if unpaid, a judgment in favor of such lender which would be senior to the rights of the Company’s stockholders. A judgment creditor would have the right to foreclose on any of the Company’s assets resulting in a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, operating results or financial condition.

Currently the Company has limited assets which could be used as collateral in obtaining future borrowings. Because of the Company’s inability to provide lenders with collateral and a limited history of successful operations, the Company may not be successful in its efforts to obtain additional funds though borrowings and as a result may not be able to fund required costs of operations.

Our growth depends on external sources of capital, which may not be available on favorable terms or at all.

Our access to capital will depend upon a number of factors over which we have little or no control, including general market conditions and the market’s perception of our current and potential future earnings. If general economic instability or downturn leads to an inability to borrow at attractive rates or at all, our ability to obtain capital to finance the purchase of real estate assets could be negatively impacted. In addition, banks and other financial institutions may be reluctant to enter into lending transactions with companies engaged in the medical-use cannabis industry. If this source of funding is unavailable to us, our levered return on the properties we purchase may be lower.

If we are unable to obtain capital on terms and conditions that we find acceptable, we likely will have to scale back our business operations. In addition, our ability to refinance all or any debt we may incur in the future, on acceptable terms or at all, is subject to all of the above factors, and will also be affected by our future financial position, results of operations and cash flows, which additional factors are also subject to significant uncertainties, and therefore we may be unable to refinance any debt we may incur in the future, as it matures, on acceptable terms or at all. All of these events would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, liquidity and results of operations.

Failure to establish or enhance our brand recognition could have a material adverse effect on our business and results of operations.

We believe we will need to expend significant time, effort and resources to enhance the recognition of our brands. We believe developing our brand will be important to our sales and marketing efforts. If we fail to establish or enhance the recognition of our brands, it could have a material adverse effect on our ability to sell our products and adversely affect our business and results of operations. If we fail to develop a positive public image and reputation, our business with our existing customers could decline and we may fail to develop additional business, which could adversely affect our results of operations.

Defects in the products we sell or failures in quality control related to our distribution of products could impair our ability to sell our products or could result in product liability claims, litigation and other significant events involving substantial costs.

Detection of any significant defects in our products that we sell or failure in our quality control procedures or the quality control procedures of our suppliers may result in, among other things, delay in time-to-market, loss of sales and market acceptance of our products, diversion of development resources, and injury to our reputation. The costs we may incur in correcting any product defects may be substantial and we may not be able to identify additional replacement suppliers, if required. Additionally, errors, defects or other performance problems could result in financial or other damages to our customers, which could result in litigation. Product liability litigation, even if we prevail and/or our suppliers, would be time consuming and costly to defend, and if we and/or our product suppliers do not prevail, could result in the imposition of a damages award. We presently maintain product liability insurance and we are named insured on our suppliers’ insurance policy; however, it may not be adequate to cover any claims.

There can be no assurances of protection for proprietary rights or reliance on trade secrets.

In certain cases, the Company may rely on trade secrets to protect intellectual property, proprietary technology and processes, which the Company has acquired, developed or may develop in the future. There can be no assurances that secrecy obligations will be honored or that others will not independently develop similar or superior products or technology. The protection of intellectual property and/or proprietary technology through claims of trade secret status has been the subject of increasing claims and litigation by various companies both in order to protect proprietary rights as well as for competitive reasons even where proprietary claims are unsubstantiated. The prosecution of proprietary claims or the defense of such claims is costly and uncertain given the uncertainty and rapid development of the principles of law pertaining to this area. The Company, in common with other firms, may also be subject to claims by other parties with regard to the use of intellectual property, technology information and data, which may be deemed proprietary to others.

Our ability to become profitable and continue as a going concern will be dependent on our ability to attract, employ and retain highly skilled individuals to serve our clients.

The nature of our business requires that we employ skilled persons to perform highly skilled and specialized tasks for our Company. Our failure to retain such personnel could have a material adverse effect on our ability to offer services to clientele, and could potentially have a negative effect on our business. There is no guarantee that skilled persons will be available and willing to work for us in the future, nor is there any guarantee that we could afford to retain them if they are available at a future time.

Our projections and forward-looking information may prove to be incorrect.

Management has prepared projections regarding the Company’s anticipated financial performance. The Company’s projections are hypothetical and based upon a presumed financial performance of the Company, the addition of a sophisticated and well-funded marketing plan, and other factors influencing the business of the Company. The projections are based on Management’s best estimate of the probable results of operations of the Company, based on present circumstances, and have not been reviewed by the Company’s independent accountants. These projections are based on several assumptions, set forth therein, which Management believes are reasonable. Some assumptions upon which the projections are based, however, invariably will not materialize due to the inevitable occurrence of unanticipated events and circumstances beyond Management’s control. Therefore, actual results of operations will vary from the projections, and such variances may be material. Assumptions regarding future changes in sales and revenues are necessarily speculative in nature. In addition, projections do not and cannot take into account such factors as general economic conditions, unforeseen regulatory changes, the entry into the Company’s market of additional competitors, the terms and conditions of future capitalization, and other risks inherent to the Company’s business. While Management believes that the projections accurately reflect possible future results of the Company’s operations, those results cannot be guaranteed.

We may not be able to manage our growth effectively.

We must continually implement and improve our products and/or services, operations, operating procedures and quality controls on a timely basis, as well as expand, train, motivate and manage our work force in order to accommodate anticipated growth and compete effectively in our market segment. Successful implementation of our strategy also requires that we establish and manage a competent, dedicated work force and employ additional key employees in corporate management, product development, client service and sales. We can give no assurance that our personnel, systems, procedures and controls will be adequate to support our existing and future operations. If we fail to implement and improve these operations, there could be a material, adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.

If we make any acquisitions or enter into a merger or similar transaction, our business may be negatively impacted.

We have no present plans for any specific acquisition. However, in the event that we make acquisitions in the future, we could have difficulty integrating the acquired companies’ personnel and operations with our own. In addition, the key personnel of the acquired business may not be willing to work for us. We cannot predict the effect expansion may have on our core business. Regardless of whether we are successful in making an acquisition, the negotiations could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees and increase our expenses. In addition to the risks described above, acquisitions, mergers and other similar transactions are accompanied by a number of inherent risks, including, without limitation, the following:

Our business could be severely impaired if and to the extent that we are unable to succeed in addressing any of these risks or other problems encountered in connection with these acquisitions, many of which cannot be presently identified, these risks and problems could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our management and employees, increase our expenses and adversely affect our results of operations.

There might be unanticipated obstacles to the execution of our business plan.

The Company’s business plans may change significantly. The Company’s potential business endeavors are capital intensive. Management believes that the Company’s chosen activities and strategies are achievable in light of current economic and legal conditions with the skills, background, and knowledge of the Company’s principals and advisors. Management reserves the right to make significant modifications to the Company’s stated strategies depending on future events.

We may engage in transactions that present conflicts of interest.

The Company’s officers and directors may enter into agreements with the Company from time to time which may not be equivalent to similar transactions entered into with an independent third party. A conflict of interest arises whenever a person has an interest on both sides of a transaction. While we believe that it will take prudent steps to ensure that all transactions between the Company and any officer or director is fair, reasonable, and no more than the amount it would otherwise pay to a third party in an “arms-length” transaction, there can be no assurance that any transaction will meet these requirements in every instance.

We have agreed to indemnify our officers and directors against lawsuits to the fullest extent of the law.

Organicell is a Nevada corporation. Nevada law permits the indemnification of officers and directors against expenses incurred in successfully defending against a claim. Nevada law also authorizes Nevada corporations to indemnify their officers and directors against expenses and liabilities incurred because of their being or having been an officer or director. Our organizational documents provide for this indemnification to the fullest extent permitted by law.

We currently do not maintain any directors & officers insurance coverage. The commercial insurance policies we do have in place contain policy limits and exclusions for certain coverages and losses. In the event that we are found liable for damage or other losses, and such amounts are not covered under our existing insurance policies, we would incur substantial and protracted losses in paying any such claims or judgments. Although we intend to acquire coverage immediately upon resources becoming available, there is no guarantee that we can secure such coverage or that any insurance coverage would protect us from any damages or loss claims filed against it.

Our operating results may fluctuate significantly as a result of a variety of factors, many of which are outside of our control.

We are subject to the following factors, among others, that may negatively affect our operating results:

We have based our current and future expense levels largely on our investment plans and estimates of future events, although certain of our expense levels are, to a large extent, fixed. We may be unable to adjust spending in a timely manner to compensate for any unexpected revenue shortfall. Accordingly, any significant shortfall in revenue relative to our planned expenditures would have an immediate adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Further, as a strategic response to changes in the competitive environment, we may from time to time make certain pricing, service or marketing decisions that could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Due to the foregoing factors, our revenue and operating results are and will remain difficult to forecast.

We are in a highly competitive and evolving field and face competition from well-established tissue processors and medical device manufacturers, as well as new market entrants.

Our business is in a very competitive and evolving field. Competition from other tissue processors, medical device companies and from research and academic institutions is intense, expected to increase, subject to rapid change, and could be significantly affected by new product introductions. The presence of this competition in our market may lead to pricing pressure, which would make it more difficult to sell our products at a price that will make us profitable or prevent us from selling our products at all. Our success will depend on our ability and/or the ability of our suppliers to perfect and protect their intellectual property rights related to their technologies as well as to develop new technologies and new applications for our technologies. Our failure to compete effectively would have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Rapid technological change could cause our products to become obsolete.

The technologies underlying the products we sell and intend to sell are subject to rapid and profound technological change. Competition intensifies as technical advances in each field are made and become more widely known. We can give no assurance that our suppliers will be able to develop services, products, or processes with significant advantages over the competing products, services, and processes. Any such occurrence could have a material and adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Our products are dependent on the availability of sufficient quantities of tissue from human donors, and any disruption in supply could adversely affect our business.

The success of the human tissue products we sell depends upon, among other factors, the availability of sufficient quantities of tissue from human donors. The availability of donated tissue could be adversely impacted by regulatory changes, public opinion of the donor process as well as our and our suppliers’ reputations in the industry. Any disruption in the supply of donated human tissue could restrict our growth and could have a material adverse impact on our business and financial condition. We cannot be sure that the supply of human tissue will continue to be available at current levels or will be sufficient to meet our future needs.

The products we offer are derived from human tissue and therefore have the potential for disease transmission.

The utilization of human tissue creates the potential for transmission of communicable disease, including, but not limited to, HIV, viral hepatitis, syphilis and other viral, fungal or bacterial pathogens. Our suppliers are required to comply with federal and state regulations intended to prevent communicable disease transmission.

Although we believe that our suppliers maintain strict quality controls over the procurement and processing of the human tissue used to make the products we sell, there is no assurance that these quality controls are or will continue to be adequate. In addition, negative publicity concerning disease transmission from other companies improperly processed donated tissue could have a negative impact on the demand for our products.

In order to grow revenues from certain of our products, we must expand our relationships with distributors and independent sales representatives.

We derive significant revenues through our relationships with distributors and independent sales representatives, though, other than our distributor for Government accounts as discussed above, no one distributor comprised over 5% of our revenues. If such relationships were terminated for any reason, it could materially and adversely affect our ability to generate revenues and profits. We intend to obtain the assistance of additional distributors and independent sales representatives to continue our sales growth with respect to certain of our products. We may not be able to find additional distributors and independent sales representatives who will agree to market and/or distribute those products on commercially reasonable terms, if at all. If we are unable to establish new distribution and independent sales representative relationships or renew current distribution and sales agency agreements on commercially acceptable terms, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially and adversely affected.

We continue to invest significant capital in expanding our internal sales force, and there can be no assurance that these efforts will continue to result in significant increases in sales.

We are engaged in a major initiative to build and further expand our internal sales and marketing capabilities which has contributed to our increased sales. As a result, we continue to invest in a direct sales force for certain of our products to allow us to reach new customers. These expenses impact our operating results, and there can be no assurance that we will continue to be successful in significantly expanding the sales of our products.

Our revenues depend on adequate reimbursement from public and private insurers and health systems.

Our success depends on the extent to which reimbursement for the costs of our products and related treatments will be available from third party payers, such as public and private insurers and health systems. Government and other third-party payers attempt to contain healthcare costs by limiting both coverage and the level of reimbursement of new products. Therefore, significant uncertainty usually exists as to the reimbursement status of new healthcare products. A significant number of public and private insurers and health systems currently do not provide reimbursement for our products. If we are not successful in obtaining adequate reimbursement for our products from these third-party payers, the market's acceptance of our products could be adversely affected. Inadequate reimbursement levels also likely would create downward price pressure on our products. Even if we do succeed in obtaining widespread reimbursement for our products, future changes in reimbursement policies could have a negative impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

To be commercially successful, we must convince physicians that our products are safe and effective alternatives to existing treatments and that our products should be used in their procedures.

We believe physicians will only adopt our products if they determine, based on experience, clinical data and published peer reviewed journal articles, that the use of our products in a particular procedure is a favorable alternative to conventional methods. Physicians may be slow to change their medical treatment practices for the following reasons, among others: 

In addition, we believe recommendations for and support of our products by influential physicians are essential for market acceptance and adoption. If we do not receive this support or if we are unable to demonstrate favorable long-term clinical data, physicians and hospitals may not use our products, which would significantly reduce our ability to achieve expected revenue and would prevent us from sustaining profitability.

We will need to expand our organization, and managing growth may be more difficult than expected.

Managing our growth may be more difficult than we expect. We anticipate that a period of significant expansion will be required to penetrate and service the market for our existing and anticipated future products and to continue to develop new products. This expansion will place a significant strain on management, operational and financial resources. To manage the expected growth of our operations and personnel, we must both modify our existing operational and financial systems, procedures and controls and implement new systems, procedures and controls. We must also expand our finance, administrative, and operations staff. Management may be unable to hire, train, retain, motivate and manage necessary personnel or to identify, manage and exploit existing and potential strategic relationships and market opportunities.

We face the risk of product liability claims and may not be able to obtain or maintain adequate product liability insurance.

Our business exposes us to the risk of product liability claims that are inherent in the manufacturing, processing and marketing of human tissue products. We may be subject to such claims if the products we sell cause, or appear to have caused, an injury. Claims may be made by patients, healthcare providers or others selling our products. We currently maintain product liability insurance that contain limits of coverage for the insured and are a named insured under the Organicell Distribution Agreement. Defending a lawsuit, regardless of merit, could be costly, divert management attention and result in adverse publicity, which could result in the withdrawal of, or reduced acceptance of, our products in the market. There can be no assurance that adequate insurance will be available in the event of a lawsuit, if at all. A product liability claim could result in significant costs and significant harm to our business.

We may implement a product recall or voluntary market withdrawal, which could significantly increase our costs, damage our reputation and disrupt our business.

The manufacturing, marketing and processing of the tissue products we sell or intend to sell involve an inherent risk that they do not meet applicable quality standards and requirements. In that event, there may be recall or market withdrawal required by a regulatory authority. A recall or market withdrawal of one of our products would be costly and would divert management resources. A recall or withdrawal of one of the products we sell, or a similar product processed, also could impair sales of our products as a result of confusion concerning the scope of the recall or withdrawal, or as a result of the damage to our reputation for quality and safety.

Significant disruptions of information technology systems or breaches of information security could adversely affect our business.

We rely to a large extent upon sophisticated information technology systems to operate our business. In the ordinary course of business, we collect, store and transmit large amounts of confidential information (including, but not limited to, personal information and intellectual property). We also have outsourced significant elements of our operations to third parties, including significant elements of our information technology infrastructure and, as a result, we are managing many independent vendor relationships with third parties who may or could have access to our confidential information. The size and complexity of our information technology and information security systems, and those of our third-party vendors with whom we contract (and the large amounts of confidential information that is present on them), make such systems potentially vulnerable to service interruptions or to security breaches from inadvertent or intentional actions by our employees or vendors, or from malicious attacks by third parties. Such attacks are of ever-increasing levels of sophistication and are made by groups and individuals with a wide range of motives (including, but not limited to, industrial espionage and market manipulation) and expertise. While we have invested significantly in the protection of data and information technology, there can be no assurance that our efforts will prevent service interruptions or security breaches. Although we have cyber-insurance coverage that may cover certain events described above, this insurance is subject to deductibles and coverage limitations and we may not be able to maintain this insurance. Also, it is possible that claims could exceed the limits of our coverage. Any interruption or breach in our systems could adversely affect our business operations and/or result in the loss of critical or sensitive confidential information or intellectual property, and could result in financial, legal, business and reputational harm to us or allow third parties to gain material, inside information that they use to trade in our securities.

New lines of business or new products and services may subject us to additional risks.

From time to time, we may implement or may acquire new lines of business or offer new products and services within existing lines of business. There are risks and uncertainties associated with these efforts, particularly in instances where the markets are not fully developed or are evolving. In developing and marketing new lines of business and new products and services, we may invest significant time and resources. External factors, such as regulatory compliance obligations, competitive alternatives, and shifting market preferences, may also impact the successful implementation of a new line of business or a new product or service. Failure to successfully manage these risks in the development and implementation of new lines of business or new products or services could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks Related to Our Intellectual Property

Our suppliers’ ability to protect their intellectual property and proprietary technology through patents and other means is uncertain and may be inadequate, which could have a material and adverse effect on us. 

We depend significantly on our suppliers’ ability to protect their proprietary rights to the technologies used in the products we purchase from them and resell. Traditional legal means afford only limited protection and may not adequately protect their rights or permit them to gain or keep any competitive advantage. To the extent that they are unable to protect their intellectual property against infringement by others or by claims of infringement by such suppliers, our business could be materially adversely affected.

We may be subject to damages resulting from claims that we, our employees, or our independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of others.

Some of our employees were previously employed at other medical device or tissue companies. We may also hire additional employees who are currently employed at other medical device or tissue companies, including our competitors. Additionally, consultants or other independent agents with which we may contract may be or have been in a contractual arrangement with one or more of our competitors. Although no claims against us are currently pending, we may be subject to claims that these employees or independent contractors have used or disclosed any party's trade secrets or other proprietary information. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. Even if we are successful in defending against these claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management. If we fail to defend such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel. A loss of key personnel or their work product could hamper or prevent our ability to market existing or new products, which could severely harm our business.

If we are unable to protect our trademarks from infringement, our business prospects may be harmed.

We currently hold a registered trademark for Organicell in the United States. Although we may take steps to monitor the possible infringement or misuse of our Organicell or other trademarks, it is possible that third parties may infringe, dilute or otherwise violate our trademark rights. Any unauthorized use of our trademarks could harm our reputation or commercial interests. In addition, our enforcement against third-party infringers or violators may be unduly expensive and time-consuming, and any remedy obtained may constitute insufficient redress relative to the damages we may suffer. Our business may be materially adversely affected in the event we are unable to protect our trademarks.

Risks Related to Regulatory Approval of Our Products and Other Government Regulations

To the extent our products do not qualify for regulation as human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue-based products under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act, this could result in removal of the applicable products from the market, would make the introduction of new tissue products more expensive and significantly delay the expansion of our tissue product offerings and subject us to additional post-market regulatory requirements.

The products we offer are derived from human tissue. The FDA has specific regulations governing human cells, tissues and cellular and tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. An HCT/P is a product containing or consisting of human cells or tissue intended for transplantation into a human patient. HCT/Ps that meet the criteria for regulation solely under Section 361 of the Public Health Service Act (so-called “361 HCT/Ps”) are not subject to any premarket clearance or approval requirements and are subject to less stringent post-market regulatory requirements.

If a product is deemed not to be a 361 HCT/P, FDA regulations will require premarket clearance or approval requirements that will involve significant time and cost investments by the Company. Further, there can be no assurance that the FDA will not, at some future point, change its position on current or future products' 361 HCT/P status, and any regulatory reclassification could have adverse consequences for us and make it more difficult or expensive for us to conduct our business by requiring premarket clearance or approval and compliance with additional post-market regulatory requirements with respect to those products. Moreover, increased regulatory scrutiny within the industry in which we operate could lead to increased regulation of HCT/Ps, including 361 HCT/Ps. We also cannot assure you that the FDA will not impose more stringent definitions with respect to products that qualify as 361 HCT/Ps.

See “Government Regulation” in Item 1 for a discussion of 361 HCT/Ps and the FDA's position on our products. If the FDA does allow the Company to continue to market a micronized form of its sheet allografts without a biologics license either prior to or after finalization of the draft guidance documents, it may impose conditions, such as labeling restrictions and compliance with cGMP. Although the Company is preparing for these requirements in connection with its pursuit of a BLA for certain of its micronized products, earlier compliance with these conditions would require significant additional time and cost investments by the Company. It is also possible that the FDA will not allow the Company to market any form of a micronized product without a biologics license even prior to finalization of the draft guidance documents and could even require the Company to recall its micronized products.

The FDA has recently announced that it intends to begin enforcement of regulations to manufacturers of certain biologics tissue products, including the products that we currently purchase through supply agreements with those identified manufacturers. If the FDA were to take enforcement action against our suppliers, it would have a material adverse impact to our operations.

During November 2017, the FDA issued guidance documents to clarify the FDA’s interpretation of the risk-based criteria manufacturers used to determine which manufactured tissue products are subject to the FDA’s premarket review and in order to be lawfully marketed in the United States, require an FDA-approved BLA.

The FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion for 36 months with regard to allowing manufacturers for certain products that are subject to the FDA’s premarket review under the existing regulations, but are not currently meeting these requirements.

The Company believes that the current products it distributes fall under the scope of these regulations and that the new regulatory restrictions being implemented by the FDA are intended to assure that all parties involved in the chain of gathering, processing, distributing and/or administrating RAAM related products have met the required standards to assure that the manufacturing, marketing the administration of the RAAM regulated products are not misleading and are performed in a safe and ethical manner and in accordance with the “objective intent” of the manufacturer.

There is no assurance that the FDA will not take enforcement action against our suppliers in connection with the products we purchase from them and sell to our customers. Furthermore, our supply agreements provide that we comply with all FDA requirements for in the use of the products we purchase from our suppliers, including the way we market the products to our customers, including our representatives and sub-distributors, and any activities that we take that might be inconsistent with the “manufacturers objective intent”, including potential significant safety concerns on how the products are being administered as well as the diseases and conditions for which they are being used. If the FDA were to take any adverse action against our supplier and/or it is determined that any of our activities are the basis for FDA enforcement against our supplier, it will have a significant adverse effect on our operations.

Our business is subject to continuing regulatory compliance by the FDA and other authorities, which is costly and our failure to comply could result in negative effects on our business.

As discussed above, the FDA has specific regulations governing our tissue-based products, or HCT/Ps. The FDA has broad post-market and regulatory and enforcement powers. The FDA's regulation of HCT/Ps includes requirements for registration and listing of products, donor screening and testing, processing and distribution (“Current Good Tissue Practices”), labeling, record keeping and adverse-reaction reporting, and inspection and enforcement.

Biologics and medical devices are subject to even more stringent regulation by the FDA. Even if pre-market clearance or approval is obtained, the approval or clearance may place substantial restrictions on the indications for which the product may be marketed or to whom it may be marketed, may require warnings to accompany the product or impose additional restrictions on the sale and/or use of the product. In addition, regulatory approval is subject to continuing compliance with regulatory standards, including the FDA's quality system regulations.

If we fail to comply with the FDA regulations regarding our tissue products or medical devices, the FDA could take enforcement action, including, without limitation, any of the following sanctions and the manufacture of our products or processing of our tissue could be delayed or terminated:

It is likely that the FDA's regulation of HCT/Ps will continue to evolve in the future. Complying with any such new regulatory requirements may entail significant time delays and expense, which could have a material adverse effect on our business. The AATB has issued operating standards for tissue banking. Compliance with these standards is a requirement in order to become an accredited tissue bank. In addition, some states have their own tissue banking regulations.

In November 2017, the FDA released four guidance documents (two final, two draft) in an effort to implement a “comprehensive policy framework” for existing laws and regulations governing regenerative medicine products, including human cells, tissues, and cellular and tissue-based products (“HCT/Ps”). These guidance documents build upon the previous regulatory framework for these products, which was completed in 2005. The Comprehensive regenerative medicine policy framework intends to spur innovation, efficient access to potentially transformative products, while ensuring safety & efficacy.

The framework builds upon the FDA’s existing risk-based regulatory approach to more clearly describe what products are regulated as drugs, devices, and/or biological products. Further, two of the guidance documents propose an efficient, science-based process for helping to ensure the safety and effectiveness of these therapies, while supporting development in this area. The suite of guidance documents also defines a risk-based framework for how the FDA intends to focus its enforcement actions against those products that raise potential significant safety concerns. This modern framework is intended to balance the agency’s commitment to safety with mechanisms to drive further advances in regenerative medicine so innovators can bring new, effective therapies to patients as quickly and safely as possible. The policy also delivers on important provisions of the Act.

Although the FDA has not changed its basic approach to regulating HCT/Ps, the agency intends to exercise enforcement discretion for 36 months with regard to 351 HCT/Ps requiring premarket approval. The guidance states that, in order to “give manufacturers time to determine if they need to submit an IND or marketing application in light of this guidance,” the FDA intends to exercise enforcement discretion (i.e., the agency may permit marketing without an approved marketing application) if the HCT/P “is intended for autologous use and its use does not raise reported safety concerns or potential significant safety concerns.” 

The Company believes that the new regulatory restrictions being implemented by the FDA are intended to assure that all parties involved in the chain of gathering, processing, distributing and/or administrating RAAM related products have met the required standards to assure that the manufacturing, marketing the administration of the RAAM regulated products are not misleading and are performed in a safe, ethical and in accordance with “objective intent”.

In addition, procurement of certain human organs and tissue for transplantation is subject to the restrictions of the National Organ Transplant Act (“NOTA”), which prohibits the transfer of certain human organs, including skin and related tissue for valuable consideration, but permits the reasonable payment associated with the removal, transportation, implantation, processing, preservation, quality control and storage of human tissue and skin. We reimburse tissue banks, hospitals and physicians for their services associated with the recovery, storage and transportation of donated human tissue. Although we have independent third party appraisals that confirm that reasonableness of the service fees we pay, if we were to be found to have violated NOTA's prohibition on the sale or transfer of human tissue for valuable consideration, we would potentially be subject to criminal enforcement sanctions, which could materially and adversely affect our results of operations.

Finally, as discussed above, we and other manufacturers of skin substitutes are required to provide ASP information to CMS on a quarterly basis. The Medicare payment rates are updated quarterly based on this ASP information. If a manufacturer is found to have made a misrepresentation in the reporting of ASP, such manufacturer is subject to civil monetary penalties of up to $10,000 for each misrepresentation for each day in which the misrepresentation was applied.

We and our sales representatives, whether employees or independent contractors, must comply with various federal and state anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and similar laws, any breach of which could cause a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our relationships with physicians, hospitals and other healthcare providers are subject to scrutiny under various federal anti-kickback, self-referral, false claims and similar laws, often referred to collectively as healthcare fraud and abuse laws. Healthcare fraud and abuse laws are complex, and even minor, inadvertent violations can give rise to claims that the relevant law has been violated. Possible sanctions for violation of these fraud and abuse laws include monetary fines, civil and criminal penalties, exclusion from federal and state healthcare programs, including Medicare, Medicaid, Veterans Administration health programs, workers' compensation programs and TRICARE (the healthcare system administered by or on behalf of the U.S. Department of Defense for uniformed services beneficiaries, including active duty and their dependents, retirees and their dependents), and forfeiture of amounts collected in violation of such prohibitions. Certain states have similar fraud and abuse laws, imposing substantial penalties for violations. Any Government investigation or a finding of a violation of these laws would likely result in a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock, as well as our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Anti-kickback laws and regulations prohibit any knowing and willful offer, payment, solicitation or receipt of any form of remuneration in return for the referral of an individual or the ordering or recommending of the use of a product or service for which payment may be made by Medicare, Medicaid or other Government-sponsored healthcare programs. We will enter into consulting agreements, speaker agreements, research agreements and product development agreements with physicians, including some who may order our products or make decisions to use them. In addition, some of these physicians own our stock, which they purchased in arm's length transactions on terms identical to those offered to non-physicians, or received stock awards from us as consideration for services performed by them. While these transactions were structured with the intention of complying with all applicable laws, including state anti-referral laws and other applicable anti-kickback laws, it is possible that regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts may in the future view these transactions as prohibited arrangements that must be restructured or for which we would be subject to other significant civil or criminal penalties. As discussed above, we have incorporated the AdvaMed code principles into our relationships with healthcare professionals under our consulting agreements, and our policies regarding payment of travel and lodging expenses, research and educational grant procedures and sponsorship of third-party conferences. In addition, we have conducted training sessions on these principles. However, there can be no assurance that regulatory or enforcement authorities will view these arrangements as being in compliance with applicable laws or that one or more of our employees or agents will not disregard the rules we have established. Because our strategy relies on the involvement of physicians who consult with us on the design of our products, perform clinical research on our behalf or educate the market about the efficacy and uses of our products, we could be materially impacted if regulatory or enforcement agencies or courts interpret our financial relationships with physicians who refer or order our products to be in violation of applicable laws and determine that we would be unable to achieve compliance with such applicable laws. This could harm our reputation and the reputations of the physicians we engage to provide services on our behalf. In addition, the cost of noncompliance with these laws could be substantial since we could be subject to monetary fines and civil or criminal penalties, and we could also be excluded from federally-funded healthcare programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, for non-compliance.

The Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”) imposes civil liability on any person or entity that submits, or causes the submission of, a false or fraudulent claim to the U.S. Government. Damages under the FCA can be significant and consist of the imposition of fines and penalties. The FCA also allows a private individual or entity with knowledge of past or present fraud against the Federal Government to sue on behalf of the Government to recover the civil penalties and treble damages. The U.S. Department of Justice (“DOJ”) on behalf of the Government has previously alleged that the marketing and promotional practices of pharmaceutical and medical device manufacturers, including the off-label promotion of products or the payment of prohibited kickbacks to doctors, violated the FCA, resulting in the submission of improper claims to federal and state healthcare entitlement programs such as Medicaid. In certain cases, manufacturers have entered into criminal and civil settlements with the federal government under which they entered into plea agreements, paid substantial monetary amounts and entered into corporate integrity agreements that require, among other things, substantial reporting and remedial actions going forward.

The scope and enforcement of all of these laws is uncertain and subject to rapid change, especially in light of the lack of applicable precedent and regulations. There can be no assurance that federal or state regulatory or enforcement authorities will not investigate or challenge our current or future activities under these laws. Any investigation or challenge could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Any state or federal regulatory or enforcement review of us, regardless of the outcome, would be costly and time consuming. Additionally, we cannot predict the impact of any changes in these laws, whether these changes are retroactive or will have effect on a going-forward basis only.

We face significant uncertainty in the industry due to Government healthcare reform.

There have been and continue to be proposals by the Federal Government, State Governments, regulators and third party payers to control healthcare costs, and generally, to reform the healthcare system in the United States. There are many programs and requirements for which the details have not yet been fully established or the consequences are not fully understood. These proposals may affect aspects of our business. We also cannot predict what further reform proposals, if any, will be adopted, when they will be adopted, or what impact they may have on us.

Risks Relating to Ownership of Our Common Stock

Our articles of incorporation allow for our board to create a new series of preferred stock without further approval by our stockholders, which could adversely affect the rights of the holders of our common stock.

Our Board of Directors has the authority to fix and determine the relative rights and preferences of preferred stock. Our Board of Directors have the authority to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of our preferred stock terms of which may be determined by the Board without further stockholder approval. As a result, our Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that would grant to holders the preferred right to our assets upon liquidation, the right to receive dividend payments before dividends are distributed to the holders of common stock and the right to the redemption of the shares, together with a premium, prior to the redemption of our common stock. In addition, our Board of Directors could authorize the issuance of a series of preferred stock that has greater voting power than our common stock or that is convertible into our common stock, which could decrease the relative voting power of our common stock or result in dilution to our existing stockholders. Although we have no present intention to issue any additional shares of preferred stock or to create any additional series of preferred stock, we may issue such shares in the future.

You may experience dilution of your ownership interests because of the future issuance of additional shares of common stock.

In the future, we may issue additional authorized but previously unissued equity securities, resulting in the dilution of the ownership interests of our shareholders. We may also issue additional shares of our securities that are convertible into or exercisable for common stock, as the case may be, in connection with hiring or retaining employees, future acquisitions, future sales of its securities for capital raising purposes, or for other business purposes. The future issuance of any such additional shares of common stock may create downward pressure on the value of our securities. There can be no assurance that we will not be required to issue additional shares of common stock, warrants or other convertible securities in the future in conjunction with any capital raising efforts, including at a price (or exercise prices) below the price at which our shares may be valued or are trading in a public market.

Offers or availability for sale of a substantial number of shares of our common stock may cause the price of our common stock to decline.

If our stockholders sell substantial amounts of their shares of our common stock, or shares of our common stock underlying any outstanding securities held by them, in the public market under Rule 144 or upon registration of such shares pursuant to an effective registration statement, or it could create a circumstance commonly referred to as an “overhang” and in anticipation of which the market price of our common stock could fall. The existence of an overhang, whether or not sales have occurred or are occurring, also could make more difficult our ability to raise additional financing through the sale of equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem reasonable or appropriate.

There can be no assurances that an active trading market may develop for our common stock, or if developed, be maintained.

The average trading volume in our stock has been historically low, with little or no trading at all on some days. As a result, an investor may find it difficult to dispose of, or to obtain accurate quotations of the price of, our common stock. Accordingly, investors must assume they may have to bear the economic risk of an investment in our common stock for an indefinite period of time. There can be no assurance that a more active market for the common stock will develop, or if one should develop, there is no assurance that it will be maintained. This severely limits the liquidity of our common stock, and would likely have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and on our ability to raise additional capital.

Our common stock is subject to the “penny stock” rules of the SEC and the trading market in the securities is limited, which makes transactions in the stock cumbersome and may reduce the value of an investment in the stock.

The SEC has adopted Rule 15g-9 which establishes the definition of a “penny stock,” for the purposes relevant to us, as any equity security that has a market price of less than $5.00 per share or with an exercise price of less than $5.00 per share, subject to certain exceptions. For any transaction involving a penny stock, unless exempt, the rules require:

In order to approve a person’s account for transactions in penny stocks, the broker or dealer must:

The broker or dealer must also deliver, prior to any transaction in a penny stock, a disclosure schedule prescribed by the SEC relating to the penny stock market, which, in highlight form sets forth:

Generally, brokers may be less willing to execute transactions in securities subject to the “penny stock” rules. This may make it more difficult for investors to dispose of common stock and cause a decline in the market value of stock.

Disclosure also has to be made about the risks of investing in penny stocks in both public offerings and in secondary trading and about the commissions payable to both the broker-dealer and the registered representative, current quotations for the securities and the rights and remedies available to an investor in cases of fraud in penny stock transactions. Finally, monthly statements have to be sent disclosing recent price information for the penny stock held in the account and information on the limited market in penny stocks.

The price of our common stock may become volatile, which could lead to losses by investors and costly securities litigation.

The trading price of our common stock is likely to be highly volatile and could fluctuate in response to factors such as:

The stock market is subject to significant price and volume fluctuations. In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been initiated against the company. Litigation initiated against us, whether or not successful, could result in substantial costs and diversion of our management’s attention and resources, which could harm our business and financial condition.

We do not anticipate dividends to be paid on our common stock, and investors may lose the entire amount of their investment.

Cash dividends have never been declared or paid on the common stock, and we do not anticipate such a declaration or payment for the foreseeable future. We expect to use future earnings, if any, to fund business growth. Therefore, stockholders will not receive any funds absent a sale of their shares. We cannot assure stockholders of a positive return on their investment when they sell their shares, nor can we assure that stockholders will not lose the entire amount of their investment.

We are awaiting approval from FINRA to proceed with our intention to reduce our authorized shares of common stock and to reverse split the issued and outstanding shares of the common stock on a ratio of seventeen (17) current shares for one (1) share of new shares, of which the impact to the trading price of our common stock and/or the liquidity for trading our common stock may be adverse to current stockholders and may not result in desired benefits to the Company.

On May 8, 2018, the Board adopted resolutions to (i) amend its Articles of Incorporation to reduce the number of authorized shares of common stock from 750,000,000 to 250,000,000 and (ii) reverse split the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock on a ratio of seventeen (17) current shares for one (1) share of new shares. On May 9, 2018, shareholders holding a majority in interest of the voting power of the Company (86.9%) approved the amendment and the reverse stock split. On June 1, 2018, the Company filed a Company-Related Action Notification with FINRA (“Notification Form”) to provide notice of certain proposed actions by the Company, including the amendment and reverse stock split. On June 18, 2018, the Company filed a Certificate of Correction with the Secretary of State of Nevada to reverse the amendments related to the Reverse Split, and will file a new Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effectuate the Reverse Split once the Reverse Split has been effectuated in the marketplace by FINRA. FINRA has recently informed the Company that it will not approve and process announcements for these Company-Related Actions until the Company’s delinquencies in its Exchange Act reports with the SEC have been fully resolved and a new Notification Form is submitted. At such time as FINRA processes the announcements, the Company will effect the reverse split of its common stock and amend its Articles to reduce its authorized common stock.

The Company believes the reverse split will bring value to the issued and outstanding shares of the Company by limiting dilution of operating results by an excessive number of shares overhanging the market. If the reverse split does not bring value to the current shareholders and/or our ability to attract prospective investors, including possible adverse impact to the trading price of our common stock and/or the liquidity for trading our common stock, it would likely have a material adverse effect on the market price of our common stock and on our ability to raise additional capital.

If securities analysts do not initiate coverage or continue to cover our common stock or publish unfavorable research or reports about our business, this may have a negative impact on the market price of our common stock.

The trading market for the common stock will depend on the research and reports that securities analysts publish about our business and the Company. We do not have any control over these analysts. There is no guarantee that securities analysts will cover the common stock. If securities analysts do not cover the common stock, the lack of research coverage may adversely affect its market price. If we are covered by securities analysts, and our stock is the subject of an unfavorable report, our stock price and trading volume would likely decline. If one or more of these analysts ceases to cover the Company or fails to publish regular reports on the Company, we could lose visibility in the financial markets, which could cause our stock price or trading volume to decline.

Our common stock is currently owned and/or controlled by executive management of the Company. Management Business and Associates, LLC, a company controlled by our Chief Executive Officer, currently owns 51% of our common stock. Executive management and Management Business and Associates LLC currently have significant ability to influence the election of our directors and the outcome of matters submitted to our stockholders.

Currently, there are 432,290,110 shares of common stock outstanding, of which 375,680,263 shares of common stock (approximately 86.9% of the outstanding shares of common stock) are owned and/or controlled by our four executive officers, Manuel E. Iglesias (though his controlling interest in Management Business and Associates LLC), Albert Mitrani, Ian T. Bothwell and Dr. Maria Mitrani, and two of the members of management are spouses, Albert Mitrani and Dr. Maria Mitrani. In addition, Mr. Iglesias and Mr. Mitrani comprise two of our three members of the Board of Directors. As a result, the foregoing persons have the ability to significantly influence the outcome of issues submitted to our stockholders. Although our officers and directors have a fiduciary obligation to the Company stockholders, their interests may not always coincide with our interests or the interests of other stockholders. As a consequence, it may be difficult for the other stockholders to remove our management. The ownership of these officers/directors could also deter unsolicited takeovers, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices.

We identified material weaknesses in our internal controls over financial reporting that existed at October 31, 2017. If we fail to properly identify or remediate any future weaknesses or deficiencies, or fail to achieve and maintain effective internal control, our ability to produce accurate and timely financial statements could be impaired and investors could lose confidence in our financial statements.

Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP. At October 31, 2017, our management determined that our internal controls over financial reports were ineffective. Although management intends to implement remedial actions to correct these inefficiencies, there can be no assurance that our remedial measures will be sufficient to address the material weaknesses or that our internal control over financial reporting will not be subject to additional material weaknesses in the future. If the remedial measures that we take are insufficient to address the material weaknesses or if additional material weaknesses or significant deficiencies in our internal control are discovered or occur in the future, our consolidated financial statements may contain material misstatements, and we could be required to restate our financial results. Additionally, we may encounter problems or delays in implementing any changes necessary for management to make a favorable assessment of our internal control over financial reporting. If we cannot favorably assess the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting, investors could lose confidence in our financial information and the price of our common stock could decline.

The Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) sales practice requirements may also limit a stockholder’s ability to buy and sell our common stock.

In addition to the “penny stock” rules described above, the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, which we refer to as FINRA, has adopted rules that require that in recommending an investment to a customer, a broker-dealer must have reasonable grounds for believing that the investment is suitable for that customer. Prior to recommending speculative low priced securities to their non-institutional customers, broker-dealers must make reasonable efforts to obtain information about the customer’s financial status, tax status, investment objectives and other information. Under interpretations of these rules, the FINRA believes that there is a high probability that speculative low priced securities will not be suitable for at least some customers. The FINRA requirements make it more difficult for broker-dealers to recommend that their customers buy our common stock, which may limit your ability to buy and sell our common stock and have an adverse effect on the market for shares of our common stock.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

Not applicable.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES.

Effective August 1, 2016, the Company’s corporate administrative offices were moved to office space located at 515 North Shore Drive, Miami Beach, Florida 33141. The office space is leased from MariLuna, LLC, a Florida limited liability company which is owned by Dr. Maria Mitrani, the Chief Science Officer and director of the Company. The term of the lease is 24 months and the monthly rent is $2,500. The Company paid a security deposit of $5,000. During April 2018, the lease term was extended for an additional 24 months and the monthly rent was increased to $2,800 effective upon commencement of the renewal term.

In connection with the executive employment agreement between the Company and our Chief Financial Officer, the Company agreed to reimburse Rover Advanced Technologies, LLC, a company owned and controlled by the Chief Financial Officer for office rent and other direct expenses (phone, internet, copier and direct administrative fees, etc.) for office space in Los Angeles, California.

We also maintain websites located at www.bpsrhealth.com and www.organicell.com, the contents of which are not incorporated into this Report. Our telephone number is (888) 963-7881.

From October 2016 through June 2017, we rented laboratory and general office space located at 1951 NW 7th Ave., Suite 300, Miami, Florida 33136 pursuant to a Services Agreement, dated October 26, 2016, between Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc., as licensee, and CIC Miami, LLC, as licensor, for approximately $3,000 per month. During May 2017, in connection with our desire to relocate our existing laboratory, we entered into a five year lease agreement between Anu Life Sciences Inc. and Sunwest Office Park, LLC for approximately 3,500 square feet of laboratory and general office space located at 15491 SW 12^th Street, Sunrise, FL 33326. The lease agreement was effective July 1, 2017 and provided for the ability of ANU to begin moving into the premises beginning June 20, 2017. In accordance with the terms of the lease for our existing laboratory facility, the Company provided its notice of termination and as of June 20, 2017 completed the relocation of the laboratory and office facilities to the new location. The term of the lease commenced on July 1, 2017, and provided for $66,395 of minimum rent in year 1 to $90,580 of minimum rent in year 5 and annual adjustments of ANU’s proportionate share of operating expenses, including real estate taxes. In connection with the Sale on February 5, 2018, the lease was assigned to Vera and the Company no longer is obligated under the lab lease.

On September 3, 2015, our wholly-owned subsidiary, Ethan NY, entered into a five-year lease agreement (“Ethan Lease”) for an approximately 450 square feet retail store location in New York City, New York (“Leased Premises”). The Ethan Lease commenced on October 1, 2015. Under the terms of the Ethan Lease, Ethan NY provided an $18,585 security deposit and a former employee of Ethan NY provided a personal guaranty for a portion of the amounts due under the Ethan Lease. During June 2016, the Company’s exited from its Leased Premises. Under the terms of the Ethan Lease, minimum monthly lease payments of $9,500 per month were to commence in December 2015 through October 2020 (“Initial Term”). During August 2016, Ethan NY received confirmation that the Leased Premises had been leased to another tenant. In connection with the termination of the Ethan Lease, Ethan NY has made several unsuccessful attempts to contact the landlord for the purpose of obtaining a settlement and release for any amounts that the landlord may claim are owing under the Ethan Lease, if any. Ethan NY is not aware of any claim pending or threatened in connection with the Ethan Lease.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

From time to time, we may become involved in various lawsuits and legal proceedings which arise in the ordinary course of business. However, litigation is subject to inherent uncertainties, and an adverse result in these or other matters may arise from time to time that may harm our business.

We are currently not aware of any pending legal proceedings to which we are a party or of which any of our property is the subject, nor are we aware of any such proceedings that are contemplated by any governmental authority.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES.

The symbol for our common stock is BPSR. Due to the late filing of this Form 10-K and other Exchange Reports, our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Market’s Pink Sheets No Information.

The following table sets forth, for the periods indicated, the reported high and low closing bid quotations for our common stock as reported by the OTC Markets’ for the past two fiscal years. The bid prices reflect inter-dealer quotations, do not include retail markups, markdowns or commissions and do not necessarily reflect actual transactions.

The Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) has adopted rules that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in penny stocks. Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in such securities is provided by the exchange or quotation system. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, that: (a) contains a description of the nature and level of risk in the market for penny stocks in both public offerings and secondary trading; (b) contains a description of the broker’s or dealer’s duties to the customer and of the rights and remedies available to the customer with respect to a violation to such duties or other requirements of securities’ laws; (c) contains a brief, clear, narrative description of a dealer market, including bid and ask prices for penny stocks and the significance of the spread between the bid and ask price; (d) contains a toll-free telephone number for inquiries on disciplinary actions; (e) defines significant terms in the disclosure document or in the conduct of trading in penny stocks; and (f) contains such other information and is in such form, including language, type, size and format, as the SEC shall require by rule or regulation. The broker-dealer also must provide, prior to effecting any transaction in a penny stock, the customer with: (a) bid and offer quotations for the penny stock; (b) the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction; (c) the number of shares to which such bid and ask prices apply, or other comparable information relating to the depth and liquidity of the market for such stock; and (d) monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer’s account. In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules; the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser’s written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a suitably written statement.

Our common stock is a penny stock. The penny stock disclosure requirements could have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for our common stock. Therefore, if our common stock becomes subject to the penny stock rules, stockholders may have difficulty selling those securities.

Description of Securities

General

Pursuant to our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, we are authorized to issue up to 750,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, and 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock, par value $0.001 per share.

On June 6, 2017, pursuant to the Nevada Revised Statutes and the Bylaws of the Company, the Board of Directors of the Company and the stockholders holding the Company’s outstanding Series A Preferred Stock, having the voting equivalency of 80% of the outstanding capital stock, approved the filing of an amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company to increase the authorized amount of common stock from 250,000,000 to 750,000,000, without changing the par value of the common stock or authorized number and par value of “blank check” Preferred Stock. On June 19, 2017, the Company filed a Definitive 14C with the SEC regarding the corporate action. On June 22, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Company’s Articles of Incorporation with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effectuate the corporate action on July 10, 2017.

On May 8, 2018, the Board adopted resolutions to (i) amend its Articles of Incorporation to reduce the number of authorized shares of common stock from 750,000,000 to 250,000,000 and (ii) reverse split the issued and outstanding shares of the Company’s common stock on a ratio of seventeen (17) current shares for one (1) share of new shares. On May 9, 2018, shareholders holding a majority in interest of the voting power of the Company (86.9%) approved the amendment and the reverse stock split. On June 1, 2018, the Company filed a Company-Related Action Notification with FINRA (“Notification Form”) to provide notice of certain proposed actions by the Company, including the amendment and reverse stock split. On June 18, 2018, the Company filed a Certificate of Correction with the Secretary of State of Nevada to reverse the amendments related to the Reverse Split, and will file a new Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of Nevada to effectuate the Reverse Split once the Reverse Split has been effectuated in the marketplace by FINRA. FINRA has recently informed the Company that it will not approve and process announcements for these Company-Related Actions until the Company’s delinquencies in its Exchange Act reports with the SEC have been fully resolved and a new Notification Form is submitted. At such time as FINRA processes the announcements, the Company will effect the reverse split of its common stock and amend its Articles to reduce its authorized common stock.

Common Stock

As of November 1, 2018, 432,290,110 shares of our common stock were outstanding.

Pursuant to our bylaws, our common stock is entitled to one vote per share on all matters submitted to a vote of the stockholders, including the election of directors. Except as otherwise required by law or provided in any resolution adopted by our board of directors with respect to any series of preferred stock, the holders of our common stock possess all voting power. Generally, all matters to be voted on by stockholders must be approved by a majority (or, in the case of election of directors, by a plurality) of the votes entitled to be cast by all shares of our common stock that are present in person or represented by proxy, subject to any voting rights granted to holders of any preferred stock. Holders of our common stock representing at least a majority of our capital stock issued, outstanding and entitled to vote, represented in person or by proxy, are necessary to constitute a quorum at any meeting of our stockholders. A vote by the holders of a majority of our outstanding shares is required to effectuate certain fundamental corporate changes such as liquidation, merger or an amendment to our Articles of Incorporation. Our Articles of Incorporation does not provide for cumulative voting in the election of directors.

Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding series of preferred stock created by our board of directors from time to time, the holders of shares of our common stock will be entitled to such cash dividends as may be declared from time to time by our board of directors from funds available therefore.

Subject to any preferential rights of any outstanding series of preferred stock created from time to time by our board of directors, upon liquidation, dissolution or winding up of our company, the holders of shares of our common stock will be entitled to receive, on a pro rata basis, all assets of our company available for distribution to such holders.

Holders of our common stock have no pre-emptive rights, no conversion rights and there are no redemption provisions or sinking fund rights applicable to our common stock. There are also no provisions discriminating against any existing or prospective holders of our common stock as a result of such security holders owning a substantial amount of securities.

Place of Meetings

Meetings of the stockholders of the Company shall be held at such place, either within or without the State of Nevada, as may be designated from time to time by the Board of Directors, or, if not so designated, then at the office of the Company.

Annual Meeting

Special Meetings

Notice of Meetings

Except as otherwise provided by law or the Articles of Incorporation, written notice of each meeting of stockholders shall be given not less than ten (10) nor more than sixty (60) days before the date of the meeting to each stockholder entitled to vote at such meeting, such notice to specify the place, date and hour and purpose or purposes of the meeting. Notice of the time, place and purpose of any meeting of stockholders may be waived in writing, signed by the person entitled to notice thereof, either before or after such meeting, and will be waived by any stockholder by his attendance thereat in person or by proxy, except when the stockholder attends a meeting for the express purpose of objecting, at the beginning of the meeting, to the transaction of any business because the meeting is not lawfully called or convened. Any stockholder so waiving notice of such meeting shall be bound by the proceedings of any such meeting in all respects as if due notice thereof had been given.

Quorum

At all meetings of stockholders, except where otherwise provided by statute or by the Articles of Incorporation, or by the bylaws, the presence, in person or by proxy duly authorized, of the holder or holders of not less than fifty percent (50%) of the outstanding shares of stock entitled to vote shall constitute a quorum for the transaction of business. In the absence of a quorum, any meeting of stockholders may be adjourned, from time to time, either by the chairman of the meeting or by vote of the holders of a majority of the shares represented thereat, but no other business shall be transacted at such meeting. The stockholders present at a duly called or convened meeting, at which a quorum is present, may continue to transact business until adjournment, notwithstanding the withdrawal of enough stockholders to leave less than a quorum. Except as otherwise provided by law, the Articles of Incorporation or the bylaws, all action taken by the holders of a majority of the votes cast, excluding abstentions, at any meeting at which a quorum is present shall be valid and binding upon the Company; provided, however, that directors shall be elected by a plurality of the votes of the shares present in person or represented by proxy at the meeting and entitled to vote on the election of directors. Where a separate vote by a class or classes or series is required, except where otherwise provided by the statute or by the Articles of Incorporation or the bylaws, a majority of the outstanding shares of such class or classes or series, present in person or represented by proxy, shall constitute a quorum entitled to take action with respect to that vote on that matter and, except where otherwise provided by the statute or by the Articles of Incorporation or the bylaws, the affirmative vote of the majority (plurality, in the case of the election of directors) of the votes cast, including abstentions, by the holders of shares of such class or classes or series shall be the act of such class or classes or series.

Adjournment and Notice of Adjourned Meetings

Any meeting of stockholders, whether annual or special, may be adjourned from time to time either by the chairman of the meeting or by the vote of a majority of the shares casting votes, excluding abstentions. When a meeting is adjourned to another time or place, notice need not be given of the adjourned meeting if the time and place thereof are announced at the meeting at which the adjournment is taken. At the adjourned meeting, the Company may transact any business which might have been transacted at the original meeting. If the adjournment is for more than thirty (30) days or if after the adjournment a new record date is fixed for the adjourned meeting, a notice of the adjourned meeting shall be given to each stockholder of record entitled to vote at the meeting.

Voting Rights

For the purpose of determining those stockholders entitled to vote at any meeting of the stockholders, except as otherwise provided by law, only persons in whose names shares stand on the stock records of the Company on the record date, as provided in the Bylaws, shall be entitled to vote at any meeting of stockholders. Every person entitled to vote shall have the right to do so either in person or by an agent or agents authorized by a proxy granted in accordance with Nevada law. An agent so appointed need not be a stockholder. No proxy shall be voted after three (3) years from its date of creation unless the proxy provides for a longer period.

Joint Owners of Stock

If shares or other securities having voting power stand of record in the names of two (2) or more persons, whether fiduciaries, members of a partnership, joint tenants, tenants in common, tenants by the entirety, or otherwise, or if two (2) or more persons have the same fiduciary relationship respecting the same shares, unless the Secretary is given written notice to the contrary and is furnished with a copy of the instrument or order appointing them or creating the relationship wherein it is so provided, their acts with respect to voting shall have the following effect: (a) if only one (1) votes, his act binds all; (b) if more than one (1) votes, the act of the majority so voting binds all; (c) if more than one (1) votes, but the vote is evenly split on any particular matter, each faction may vote the securities in question proportionally. If the instrument filed with the Secretary shows that any such tenancy is held in unequal interests, a majority or even-split for the purpose of subsection (c) shall be a majority or even-split in interest.

List of Stockholders

The Secretary shall prepare and make, at least ten (10) days before every meeting of stockholders, a complete list of the stockholders entitled to vote at said meeting, arranged in alphabetical order, showing the address of each stockholder and the number of shares registered in the name of each stockholder. Such list shall be open to the examination of any stockholder, for any purpose germane to the meeting, during ordinary business hours, for a period of at least ten (10) days prior to the meeting, either at a place within the city where the meeting is to be held, which place shall be specified in the notice of the meeting, or, if not specified, at the place where the meeting is to be held. The list shall be produced and kept at the time and place of meeting during the whole time thereof and may be inspected by any stockholder who is present.

Action Without Meeting

No action shall be taken by the stockholders except at an annual or special meeting of stockholders called in accordance with the bylaws, or by the written consent of the stockholders setting forth the action so taken and signed by the holders of outstanding stock having not less than the minimum number of votes that would be necessary to authorize or take such action at a meeting at which all shares entitled to vote upon were present and voted.

Organization

Declaration of Dividends

Dividends upon the capital stock of the Company, subject to the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation, if any, may be declared by the Board of Directors pursuant to law at any regular or special meeting. Dividends may be paid in cash, in property, or in shares of the capital stock, subject to the provisions of the Articles of Incorporation.

Dividend Reserve

Before payment of any dividend, there may be set aside out of any funds of the Company available for dividends such sum or sums as the Board of Directors from time to time, in their absolute discretion, think proper as a reserve or reserves to meet contingencies, or for equalizing dividends, or for repairing or maintaining any property of the Company, or for such other purpose as the Board of Directors shall think conducive to the interests of the Company, and the Board of Directors may modify or abolish any such reserve in the manner in which it was created.

Amended and Restated By-laws

On March 8, 2017, and December 13, 2017, the Board amended and restated the by-laws of the Company (the “Second Amended and Restated By-laws”).

Pursuant to Section 4.08(c) of the Second Amended and Restated By-laws, the following actions may not be taken without the approval of a supermajority (as defined below) of the full Board of Directors: 

For purposes of Section 4(a)(8), a “supermajority” of the full Board of Directors shall consist of:

Preferred Stock

Our Articles of Incorporation authorizes our board of directors to issue up to 10,000,000 shares of “blank check” preferred stock in one or more designated series, each of which shall be so designated as to distinguish the shares of each series of preferred stock from the shares of all other series and classes. Our board of directors is authorized, without stockholders’ approval, within any limitations prescribed by law and our Articles of Incorporation, to fix and determine the designations, rights, qualifications, preferences, limitations and terms of the shares of any series of preferred stock including but not limited to the following:

Holders of Our Common Stock

As of November 1, 2018, we had approximately 65 record holders of our common stock.

Stock Transfer Agent

Below is the name, mailing address, phone and fax numbers, email address and website of our transfer agent:

Action Stock Transfer

2469 E. Fort Union Blvd, Suite 214

Salt Lake City, UT 84121

Phone: (801) 274-1088

Fax: (801) 274-1099

www.actionstocktransfer.com

Options

There are no outstanding options to purchase our securities. We may, however, grant such options and/or establish an incentive stock option plan for our directors, executive officers, employees and consultants in the future.

Warrants

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2015, the Company issued an aggregate of 504,057 Class A Warrants and 504,057 Class B Warrants. Each Class A Warrant is exercisable to purchase one share of common stock for $0.50 per share from the date of issuance until the fourth anniversary date of the date of issuance. Each Class B Warrant is exercisable to purchase one share of common stock for $1.00 per share from the date of issuance until the fourth anniversary date of the date of issuance. The Class A Warrants and Class B Warrants were issued in connection with Units sold in private offerings. See “Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities” below.

From November 2015 through March 2016, the Company issued an aggregate of 364,685 Class A Warrants and 364,685 Class B Warrants. Each Class A Warrant is exercisable to purchase one share of common stock for $0.50 per share from the date of issuance until the fourth anniversary date of the date of issuance. Each Class B Warrant is exercisable to purchase one share of common stock for $1.00 per share from the date of issuance until the fourth anniversary date of the date of issuance. The Class A Warrants and Class B Warrants were issued in connection with Units sold in private offerings. See “Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities” below.

In connection with the Executive Employments Agreements, each dated November 4, 2016, between the Company and each of Ian T. Bothwell, Dr. Bruce Werber and Dr. Maria I. Mitrani, the Company granted the following warrants to each executive as described below:

During January 2017 and February 2017, the Company issued an aggregate of 1,800,000 warrants in connection with common stock offerings. 900,000 of the warrants are exercisable to purchase shares of common stock for $0.075 per share from the date of issuance until the third anniversary date of the date of issuance and 900,000 of the warrants are exercisable to purchase shares of common stock for $0.15 per share from the date of issuance until the third anniversary date of the date of issuance. See “Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities” below.

In connection with the Participation Agreement, on March 8, 2017, the Company issued warrants to Mr. Peter Taddeo, a member of the Board and the Chief Executive Officer and a director of both Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida, and Mr. Wayne Rohrbaugh, the Chief Operating Officer and a director of both Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida, to each purchase 150,000 shares of common stock of the Company at an exercise price of $0.15 per share, exercisable from the date of issuance until the third anniversary date of the date of issuance. See “Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities” below.

On March 8, 2017, in connection with Mr. Suddarth’s employment agreement, the Company granted Mr. Suddarth a warrant to purchase, on a cashless basis, 23,850,000 shares of the Company’s common stock at an exercise price of $0.02 per share, the closing price of common stock of the Company on March 8, 2017, exercisable in accordance with the vesting schedule below until the tenth (10th) anniversary of the date of issuance:

On March 8, 2017, the Board of the Company granted warrants to purchase shares of common stock of the Company on a cashless basis to the following executive officers and directors of the Company:

The foregoing warrants are exercisable for $0.02 per share, the closing price of common stock of the Company on March 8, 2017, and are exercisable from the date of issuance until the 10th anniversary of the date of issuance.

In connection with the Sale of ANU assets on February 5, 2018, and the immediate resignation and termination of the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, he agreed to forfeit 53,300,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock held at the time of the resignation and the Company agreed to grant him 7,500,000 shares of newly issued common stock of the Company (valued at $0.011 per share, the closing price of the common stock of the Company on the date of the Sale).

In connection with the Sale of ANU assets on February 5, 2018, and the immediate resignation and termination of the Company’s Chief Technology Officer, the Chief Technology Officer agreed to forfeit 23,850,000 warrants to purchase shares of the Company’s common stock held at the time of the resignation and the Company agreed to grant the Chief Technology Officer 7,500,000 shares of newly issued common stock of the Company (valued at $0.011 per share, the closing price of the common stock of the Company on the date of the Sale).

In connection with the amendment to the Chief Financial Officer’s employment agreement on April 6, 2018, the terms of the remaining warrants previously granted to the Chief Financial Officer were modified to provide that in the event of an occurrence of a change in control or termination of the employment (as defined in the agreement), pursuant to the terms thereof, the exercise price for all outstanding warrants granted to the Chief Financial officer to purchase common stock of the Company during the term of his employment agreement shall be reduced to $0.001 per share.

In connection with the amendment to the Chief Science Officer’s employment agreement on April 6, 2018, the terms of the remaining warrants previously granted to the Chief Science Officer were modified to provide that in the event of an occurrence of a change in control or termination of the employment (as defined in the agreement), pursuant to the terms thereof, the exercise price for all outstanding warrants granted to the Chief Science Officer to purchase common stock of the Company during the term of her employment agreement shall be reduced to $0.001 per share.

In connection with the Reorganization Plan, the CFO and CSO each agreed to exercise on a cashless basis all of their warrants to purchase 53,300,000 and 23,850,000 shares of common stock of the Company, respectively. Based on the closing price of the Company’s common stock on the Effective Date of $0.016 per share and the warrant exercise price of $0.001 per share, the CFO and CSO were required to use 4,675,439 and 2,092,105 shares of common stock received from the exercise of the warrants, respectively, to pay for the exercise price for exercising all of the warrants.

Change in Control

On April 23, 2018, the Company and Management and Business Associates, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“MBA”), executed a Plan and Agreement of Reorganization (“Reorganization Plan”) whereby the Company agreed to issue to MBA an aggregate of 222,425,073 shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share of the Company, representing 51% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on fully-diluted basis, for $0.001 per share (or an aggregate of $222,425), in consideration for MBA’s founder and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Manuel Iglesias’ agreement to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of the Company. The Reorganization Plan was retroactive as of April 13, 2018 (“Effective Date”). The Reorganization Plan also provided for the cancelation and termination of the Company’s previously issued and outstanding Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock. As a result of the above Reorganization Plan, Mr. Iglesias acquired controlling interest of the Company. As a result, Mr. Iglesias, has the sole ability to significantly influence the outcome of issues submitted to our stockholders. In addition, the total ownership held by our officers and directors as a group is approximately 86.9% As a consequence, it may be difficult for the other stockholders to remove our management. The ownership / control by these officers/directors could also deter unsolicited takeovers, including transactions in which stockholders might otherwise receive a premium for their shares over then current market prices.

We are not aware of any other arrangements, including any pledge by any person of our securities, the operation of which may result in a change in control of the Company. However, pursuant to our Articles of Incorporation, our board has the authority, without further stockholder approval, to provide for the issuance of up to 10 million shares of our preferred stock in one or more series and to determine the dividend rights, conversion rights, voting rights, rights in terms of redemption, liquidation preferences, the number of shares constituting any such series and the designation of such series. Our Board has the power to afford preferences, powers and rights (including voting rights) to the holders of any preferred stock preferences, such rights and preferences being senior to the rights of holders of common stock.

Pursuant to our Second Amended and Restated Bylaws, the consent of a “supermajority” (as defined the Bylaws and dependent on how many directors there are at the time) of the Board is required for various actions which might be taken in connection with delaying or preventing a change in control of the Company desired by a majority of our Board of Directors, including, but not limited to, (i) the sale, exchange or other disposition of the Company’s assets with an aggregate value of at least $100,000 or all, or substantially all, of the Company’s assets, whichever is less, occurring as part of a single transaction or plan, or in multiple transactions over a six (6) month period, except in the orderly liquidation and winding up of the business of the Company upon its duly authorized dissolution, (ii) the acquisition of the stock or assets of another entity or the merger therewith, regardless of the nature or amount of consideration given therefor. Other than the foregoing, there are no provisions in our Articles of Incorporation or Bylaws that would delay, defer or prevent a change in control of our Company.

Dividend Policy

We have never paid any cash dividends on our capital stock and do not anticipate paying any cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We intend to retain future earnings to fund ongoing operations and future capital requirements. Any future determination to pay cash dividends will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors and will be dependent upon financial condition, results of operations, capital requirements and such other factors as the Board of Directors deems relevant.

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

The Company had no equity compensation plans as of the end of the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

None of the above issuances involved any underwriters, underwriting discounts or commissions, or any public offering and we believe were exempt from the registration requirements of the Securities Act by virtue of Section 4(a)(2) promulgated thereunder due to the fact that there was no solicitation or advertising and the did not involve a public offering of securities.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide the information required by this item of Form 10-K.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.

You should read the following discussion together with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes included elsewhere in this report. This discussion contains forward-looking statements, which involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results may differ materially from those we currently anticipate as a result of many factors, including the factors we describe under “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this report.

Forward Looking Statements

Some of the information in this section contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. You can identify these statements by forward-looking words such as “may,” “will,” “expect,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate” and “continue,” or similar words. You should read statements that contain these words carefully because they:

We believe it is important to communicate our expectations. However, there may be events in the future that we are not able to accurately predict or over which we have no control. Our actual results and the timing of certain events could differ materially from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements as a result of certain factors, including those set forth under “Risk Factors,” “Business” and elsewhere in this report.

Unless stated otherwise, the words “we,” “us,” “our,” the “Company” or “Biotech Products Services and Research,” “Organicell” in this section collectively refer to Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and its subsidiaries.

Overview

Since the change in control of our Company in June 2015 and change in the Company’s operations in July 2015, we have been engaged in the health care industry, principally focusing on supplying products and services related to the growing field of regenerative anti-aging medicine (“RAAM”). Our goal is to supply newly designed advanced biologically processed cellular and tissue based products developed from internally based research and development activities and/or from other state-of-the-art RAAM-related products developed by third parties under exclusive supply arrangements and to provide other related services used in the growing health care field of regenerative medicine (“RAAM Products”). We intend to distribute the RAAM Products and market RAAM-related services to the health care industry and a referral network of doctors and clinics (collectively, the “Providers”), through our newly established in-house sales force and/or through arrangements with independent distributors.

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016, our revenues were lower than projected primarily due to the Company’s ongoing cash restraints which limited the ability of the Company to attract and retain sales related personnel and the level of advertising and social media marketing efforts that could be deployed towards increasing revenues. In addition, our costs from third party suppliers of the products the Company sold were higher than projected due to the Company’s inability to provide minimum guarantees on purchase commitments and the Company was unable to negotiate terms with these suppliers for private labeling and/or granting of exclusive sales territories, factors important to many independent distributors.

As a result of the above, the Company determined during November 2016 that it would immediately focus on implementing its strategy to develop products internally in order to effectively position itself and compete in the RAAM market, provide the Company with improved margins obtained on the sale of its products, and to increase revenues resulting from the ability to differentiate its products as superior to its competitors combined with leveraging existing marketing programs and strategies aimed to attract distributors and Providers.

In connection with this strategy, during November 2016, the Company announced additions to its executive management team, including Chief Operating Officer, Dr. Bruce Werber; Chief Financial Officer, Mr. Ian T. Bothwell; and Chief Science Officer, Dr. Maria Ines Mitrani, who joined Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Albert Mitrani. On March 8, 2017, the Company appointed Mr. Terrell Suddarth as the Chief Technology Officer. Messrs. Mitrani, Werber, Bothwell, and Suddarth and Ms. Mitrani are collectively referred to as the “Management Team.” The Company believes that the Management Team provides itself with significant industry, technical and financial related experience as the Company begins the launch and expansion of the supply of newly developed innovative amnion placental tissue products. Each member of the Management Team also serve as members of the Board of Directors of the Company and each has executed employment agreements with the Company.

During January 2017, Anu Life Sciences Inc., a Florida corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“Anu”), announced that it successfully completed several trial production runs of its first amnion placental tissue product (“New Amnio Product”). During February 2017, the Company received satisfactory validation for its first production batch of the New Amnio Product and commenced shipping the New Amnio Product to customers. Since the release of the New Amnio Product, Anu has developed other placental tissue derived products for commercial sale to Providers in the health care industry. Anu’s products developed were sold through Anu’s designated distributor and affiliate, General Surgical Florida Inc., a Florida corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company (“General Surgical”), under the name “Anu Rheo” and “Vendaje.”

Although the Company was successful in developing products for distribution, the Company began exploring options to sell the assets comprising the manufacturing operations operated by Anu in order to mitigate the substantial ongoing operating risks associated with the operations of the manufacturing facility, including (a) the lack of adequate working capital which prevented the ability of the Company to pay wages to any of its key executives since November 2016, and the looming realization that the services of the key executives would not remain indefinitely without additional funding, (b) the lack of working capital which prevented the ability of the Company to hire additional sales and manufacturing personnel and other critically needed staff and to make required payments to vendors, (c) existing and newly issued FDA guidelines governing Anu’s manufacturing operations that were projected to require significant additional capital resources to be deployed to satisfactorily meet regulatory requirements within specified deadlines, (d) continuing difficulties to demonstrate to the Company’s current and potential distributors and customers of the Company’s financial stability and ability to remain a going concern and in compliance with FDA guidelines, important considerations of distributors and customers in selecting suppliers for the products which were being manufactured and supplied by Anu, and (e) the concern over the inability to make the upcoming principal and interest payments due on the Company’s convertible promissory notes which were to become due and payable in full on March 29, 2018 or sooner, in the event of default. The convertible promissory notes were secured by all of the Company’s assets and any event of default in the future would have caused a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations.

Effective February 5, 2018 (“Closing Date”), Vera Acquisition LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Vera"), Organicell, ANU and General Surgical, executed an Asset Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement") pursuant to which ANU sold or transferred to Vera their right, title and interest in certain tangible and other assets associated with its manufacturing operations, including, prepaid expenses, raw and finished goods inventory, a long term lease for ANU’s laboratory facility in Sunrise, Florida (including associated security deposits), furniture and equipment, and certain intellectual property rights and General Surgical transferred its rights to certain third-party distribution agreements between General Surgical and distributors of products manufactured by ANU (“Sale”) in exchange for a cash payment of $950,000 and execution of a long term distribution agreement with Organicell (“Organicell Distribution Agreement”) which provided Organicell, or its designees, certain exclusive and non-exclusive rights to distribute future products to be manufactured by Vera, including products that were developed and produced by ANU prior to the Closing Date and additional products that may be developed and produced by Vera in the future. In connection with the Sale, Vera received credit for $100,000 previously paid by it to ANU for prepaid product supply which was not yet delivered to Vera as of the Closing Date. During August 2018, Vera notified the Company that it was no longer in the business originally acquired in connection with the Sale and that it was no longer able to supply products to the Company under the Organicell Distribution Agreement (“Vera Exit”). As a result of the Vera Exit, the Company is once again relying on short-term supply agreements with other third party manufacturers to provide it with the products it currently distributes.

In connection with the Sale, Vera arranged for the employment of the Company’s COO and CTO effective upon the closing of the Sale. In connection with such employment, the COO and CTO each entered into a Separation and General Release Agreement with the Company effective upon the closing of the Sale which provided for their immediate resignation from the Company and its subsidiaries, and the settlement of all obligations of each party to the other pursuant to the respective employment agreements, including the release of all rights the Company may have held in any intellectual property of the COO and CTO and any non-compete restrictions on the COO and CTO. In connection with such releases, each of the COO and CTO agreed to forfeit all warrants previously granted and outstanding (a total of 77,150,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock of the Company), forfeit any and all accrued and unpaid amounts owing under the employment agreements for past due wages, benefits, severance obligations, unreimbursed expenses and any other obligations owing to one another as of the date of the Closing Date in exchange for a grant of 7,500,000 shares of restricted common stock of the Company to each of the COO and CTO (valued at $0.011 per share, the closing price of the common stock of the Company on the date of the Sale).

The Company’s decision to sell the assets comprising the manufacturing operations operated by ANU was made in order to mitigate the substantial ongoing operating risks associated with the operations of the manufacturing facility, including (a) the lack of adequate working capital which prevented the ability of the Company to pay wages to any of its key executives since November 2016, and the looming realization that the services of the key executives would not remain indefinitely without additional funding, (b) the lack of working capital which prevented the ability of the Company to hire additional sales and manufacturing personnel and other critically needed staff and to make required payments to vendors, (c) existing and newly issued FDA guidelines released in November 2017 governing ANU’s manufacturing operations that were projected to require significant additional capital resources to be deployed to satisfactorily meet regulatory requirements within specified deadlines, (d) continuing difficulties to demonstrate to the Company’s current and potential distributors and customers of the Company’s financial stability and ability to remain a going concern and in compliance with FDA guidelines, important considerations of distributors and customers in selecting suppliers for the products which were being manufactured and supplied by ANU, and (e) the concern over the ability to make the upcoming principal and interest payments due on the Company’s convertible promissory notes which were to become due and payable in full on March 29, 2018 or sooner, in the event of default. The convertible promissory notes were secured by all of the Company’s assets and any event of default in the future would have caused a material adverse impact on the Company’s operations.

After the completion of the Sale, the Company remains in the business of selling and distributing regenerative biologic therapies based on amnion placental tissue derived products to doctors and hospitals but relies on supply arrangements with third-party manufacturers or indirectly from distributors of third-party manufacturers, rather than from products internally manufactured, for the supply of these advanced biologically processed cellular and tissue based products.

Since the Sale was completed, including the departure of several key executives, the Company had been unsuccessful in generating sufficient revenues and as a result continued to have a lack of working capital to meet current operating costs, hiring of additional sales personnel, pay past due accounts payable obligations to its vendors, pay past due and/or current salaries to its remaining management or fund potential growth opportunities. Because of such uncertainties, there still existed substantial doubt as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.

On April 23, 2018, the Company and Management and Business Associates, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“MBA”), executed a Plan and Agreement of Reorganization (“Reorganization Plan”) whereby the Company agreed to issue to MBA an aggregate of 222,425,073 shares of its common stock of the Company, representing 51% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on fully-diluted basis, for $0.001 per share (or an aggregate of $222,425), in consideration for MBA’s founder and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Manuel Iglesias’ agreement to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of the Company. The Reorganization Plan was effective as of April 13, 2018 (“Effective Date”).

Prior to the execution and effectiveness of the Reorganization Plan, Mr. Iglesias moved from his position as Chief Executive Officer to a position as Co-Chairman of the Board of Hygea Holdings Corp., a Florida corporation (“Hygea”), a diversified healthcare holding company that owns physician practices, ancillary services companies (e.g., pharmacies, therapies and diagnostic facilities), independent physician associations (“IPAs”), and other medical service entities that provide seamless care to commercial, Medicare and Medicaid patients. As the newly appointed Chief Executive Officer of the Company, Mr. Iglesias intends to bring his extensive industry experience and relationships to attract capital and industry leaders to the Company as the Company seeks to stabilize, expand and grow the business into becoming a leading supplier of services, products and therapies for the regenerative health care sector, including expansion into the rapidly growing wellness sector, and to pursue clinical studies and certifications for specific disease states using the expedited FDA program for regulatory approval for regenerative medicine advance therapies (“RMAT”). As part of the Company’s efforts to raise capital, the Company has recently initiated and/or completed several important corporate governance changes to simplify the Company’s capital structure and to attract investment capital including:

On June 1, 2018, the Company submitted an Issuer Company-Related Notification Form (“June 1 Notification Form”) with the Financial Industry Regulatory Agency (“FINRA”) pursuant to Rule 10b-17 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), regarding the Name Change and Reverse Split. However, due to the Company’s delinquency its Exchange Act reports with the SEC by failing to file this Annual Report and its Quarterly Reports for the quarters ended January 31, 2018 and April 30, 2018, FINRA did not announce or effectuate the Name Change or Reverse Split in the marketplace. FINRA has since informed the Company that as a result of the length of time before the Company expects to file its delinquent Exchange Act reports with the SEC, a new Issuer Company-Related Notification Form will be required to be submitted for approval upon the Company becoming current in its Exchange Act filings. We intend to resubmit an Issuer Company-Related Notification Form with FINRA and we anticipate that FINRA will announce and effectuate the Name Change and Reverse Split in the marketplace at that time.

In connection with the new regulations enacted as of November 8, 2016 by the Florida state legislature (“Amendment No. 2”) that permits Florida residents to apply to open Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers (“MMTC”) for defined MMTC licensed activities, the Company entered into a Participation Agreement, effective February 14, 2017 (the “Agreement”), with Mr. Peter Taddeo (“Taddeo”) and Mr. Wayne Rohrbaugh (“Rohrbaugh”), two then non-affiliated accredited investors (collectively, the “Investors”) for the purpose of obtaining a Florida license and operating a business to dispense medical cannabis. Pursuant to the terms of the Participation Agreement, the Company formed and capitalized Mint Organics, Inc., a Florida corporation and a 55% owned subsidiary of the Company (“Mint Organics”), and Mint Organics Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation and a 96% owned subsidiary of Mint Organics (“Mint Organics Florida”), to explore, develop and to provide products and services in connection with the MMTC activities that they are licensed to operate.

In connection with the Participation Agreement, on February 28, 2017, Mr. Taddeo was appointed as the Chief Executive Officer and as a director of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida and Mr. Rohrbaugh was appointed as the Chief Operating Officer and as a director of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida. Also, on March 8, 2017, Mr. Taddeo was appointed as a member to the Board of Directors of the Company.

The Company initially believed that expanding into the MMTC industry, and being one of the first group of companies to be granted a license to operate within Florida, would provide significant opportunities for increasing overall revenues and growth for the Company. In addition, the growing science and research regarding the regenerative health benefits associated with the use of marijuana had certain synergies with the Company’s current RAAM operations and strategy to become a leading supplier of newly designed advanced biologically processed cellular and tissue based products and services used in the growing health care field of regenerative medicine.

As of October 31, 2017, Mint Organics had not been successful in obtaining a Florida license allowing Mint Organics or Mint Organics Florida to operate a business to dispense medical cannabis. In addition, Mint Organics had exhausted all of its working capital and Organicell was unable to identify additional sources of working capital.

On April 6, 2018, Mr. Taddeo resigned as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and as the Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida. Mr. Taddeo’s resignation was due to his decision to pursue other personal objectives, particularly in light of the ongoing lack of adequate working capital at Mint Organics to demonstrate the ability to fund a reasonable level of future cash compensation to Mr. Taddeo and the additional capital required to sustain future efforts required to successfully pursue obtaining a license to operate cannabis dispensaries.

The Company has been evaluating viable alternatives regarding the future operations of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida. Since the time that the Company began efforts to obtain a Florida license, the state of Florida has granted all of the number of licenses currently authorized to operate dispensaries to other competitors. The Company believes that there are currently many other entities competing to obtain licenses to operate dispensaries and that the limited number of licenses that are expected to be authorized and granted in the future will be to those companies with significantly more working capital and expertise than the Company.

Currently, our RAAM-related operations are conducted through the following wholly-owned subsidiaries*:

Our MMTC exploratory activities have been conducted through the following the following subsidiaries. As described above, effective April 6, 2018, Mr. Taddeo resigned as CEO of our MMTC subsidiaries. The Company has yet to replace Mr. Taddeo and the Company is evaluating its alternatives regarding the future operations of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida **:

Current and Future Operations:

Our current strategy is to achieve the following goals and milestones:

Develop and expand operations to provide for growth of our revenues for the sales and distribution of RAAM related products;

Secure additional working capital;

Evaluate our future alternatives for development of the MMTC business segment;

Enhance Company Corporate Governance;

Since inception, we have incurred net operating losses. Losses have principally occurred as a result of our inability to increase and stabilize revenues which have remained insufficient as a result of a lack of working capital to (a) fund effectively the marketing of our products, (b) the ability to attract and retain needed personnel and/or (c) to fund the expansion into other growth opportunities, including the substantial resources required for research and development. We expect operating losses to continue. Our available funds combined with our current revenue levels will not fund current levels of ongoing general and administrative expenses associated with our operations. We expect to need additional financing to develop, produce market our products and to cover the general and administrative expenses of the Company.

Results of Operations from Discontinued Operations

During September 2015, the Company formed Ethan New York, Inc., a New York corporation (“Ethan NY”) for the purpose of selling clothing and accessories through a retail store. On September 3, 2015, Ethan NY entered into a five-year lease agreement (“Ethan Lease”) for a store located in New York City, New York. The Ethan Lease commenced on October 1, 2015. Under the terms of the Ethan Lease, Ethan NY provided an $18,585 security deposit and a former employee of Ethan NY provided a personal guaranty for a portion of the amounts due under the Ethan Lease. During June 2016, Ethan NY exited from its leased premises and the Ethan NY operations were closed. As a result, the operations of Ethan NY have been reflected as discontinued operations in the financial statements. Ethan NY did not make any of the required minimum monthly lease payments pursuant to the Ethan Lease totaling $586,242 (excluding late fees and interest provided for under the Ethan Lease). All of Ethan NY’s obligations under the Ethan Lease are recourse only to the assets at Ethan NY, except for certain obligations under the Ethan Lease that were guaranteed by a former employee. Under the terms of the Ethan Lease, the obligations of Ethan NY for future rents are to be mitigated based on the amount of any future rents that are received for the rental of the leased premises to other tenants during the initial term. During August 2016, Ethan NY received confirmation that the leased premises had been leased to another tenant. In connection with the termination of the Ethan Lease, Ethan NY has made several unsuccessful attempts to contact the landlord for the purpose of obtaining a settlement and release for any amounts that the landlord may claim are owing under the Ethan Lease, if any. Ethan NY is not aware of any claim pending or threatened in connection with the Ethan Lease.

Results of Operations

As a result of the discontinuation of the Ethan NY business in June 2016, our continuing operations only consist of the Referral and Product Sales business which commenced on July 1, 2015 and were briefly suspended beginning November 2016, as the Company began to implement its strategy of developing and producing its own line of RAAM products. Revenues resumed in February 2017 as the first of the Company’s products developed became available for sale to Providers.

For the Fiscal Year Ended October 31, 2017 and October 31, 2016

Revenues

Our revenues for the year ended October 31, 2017 were $569,845, compared with revenues of $184,881 for the year ended October 31, 2016. The increase in revenues during the year ended October 31, 2017 was the result of the Company’s successful development and commercialization of its first manufactured RAAM product during February 2017 which followed the new strategy implemented during November 2016 to distribute its own developed products to better differentiate against competitor products and provide distributors with the necessary financial incentives to sell our products. All of revenues during the year ended October 31, 2016 were from referral and sales of products supplied by third parties.

Cost of Revenues

Our cost of revenues for the year ended October 31, 2017 were $160,626, compared with cost of revenues of $94,402 for the year ended October 31, 2016. The increase in cost of revenues during the year ended October 31, 2017 was the result of the Company’s sales of its newly developed RAAM product which did not occur until the year ended October 31, 2017 and represented significantly higher amount of lower costing units. In addition, the cost of revenues during the year ended October 31, 2016 were mostly from referrals that have significantly higher margins and, in some instances, do not involve any cost of revenues associated with products sold.

Gross Profit

Our gross profit for the year ended October 31, 2017 was $409,219, compared with gross profit of $90,479 for the year ended October 31, 2016. The increase in gross profit during the year ended October 31, 2017 was the result of newly developed sales revenues from the Company’s successful development and commercialization of its RAAM product beginning in February 2017, which replaced the Company’s previous source of revenues from high margin referral revenues that was the principal source of the Company’s revenues during the year ended October 31, 2016. The sale of its own products follows the Company’s earlier stated planned strategy to distribute its own developed products to better differentiate against competitor products and provide distributors with the necessary financial incentives to sell our products.

General and Administrative Expenses

General and administrative expenses for the year ended October 31, 2017 were $9,050,743, compared with $1,133,796 for the year ended October 31, 2016. The increase in the general and administrative expenses for the year ended October 31, 2017 was the result of payroll related costs (approximately $1,570,000), stock-based compensation costs from the vesting of issued warrants to executives in connection with employment agreements executed and other grants (approximately $5,823,000), professional fees (approximately $370,000) and approximately $154,000 of costs associated with the operations of the new laboratory facility which began operating in November 2016 in connection with the Company’s efforts beginning November 2016, to implement its strategy of developing and producing its own line of RAAM products. The general and administrative expenses for the year ended October 31, 2016 were mostly related to payroll and professional fees.

Other Income (Expense)

Other expense for the year ended October 31, 2017 was $470,995, compared with $12,729 for the year ended October 31, 2016. The net increase in the other expense was the result of increased interest costs principally associated with the issuance of the convertible secured promissory note in connection with the SPA on March 29, 2017 of $563,287, partially offset from a gain in the fair value of derivative liabilities of $95,971 associated with the issuance of the convertible secured promissory note in connection with the SPA on March 29, 2017.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2016 and through the date of the filing of this Form 10-K, the Company has relied on the sale of equity securities, the issuance of debt or restructuring of debt obligations to meet the shortfall in cash to fund its operations.

The Company issued the foregoing securities pursuant to the exemption from the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, available under Section 4(a)(2) promulgated thereunder due to the fact that they were isolated sales to a limited number of people and did not involve a public offering of securities.

Going Concern Consideration

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has had limited revenues since its inception. The Company incurred a net loss of $9,112,519 for the year ended October 31, 2017. In addition, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $11,085,743 at October 31, 2017. The Company had a negative working capital position of $3,599,915 at October 31, 2017. The Company’s efforts to establish a stabilized source of sufficient revenues to cover operating costs has yet to be achieved and ultimately may prove to be unsuccessful unless additional sources of working capital through operations or debt and/or equity financings are realized. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management anticipates that the Company will remain dependent, for the near future, on additional investment capital to fund ongoing operating expenses. As a result of the Sale, the Company does not have any assets to pledge for the purpose of borrowing additional capital. In addition, the Company relies on non-exclusive supply arrangements to obtain the supply of the products it currently sells and distributes to its customers. The Company’s current market capitalization and common stock liquidity will hinder its ability to raise equity proceeds. The Company anticipates that future sources of funding, if any, will therefore be costly and dilutive. if available at all.

In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraphs, recoverability of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet assumes that (1) the Company will be able to establish a stabilized source of revenues, (2) obligations to the Company’s creditors are not accelerated, (3) the Company’s operating expenses remain at current levels and/or the Company is successful in restructuring and/or deferring ongoing obligations, (4) the Company is able to continue to obtain products under current supply arrangements or from other suppliers with similar terms and conditions, and (5) the Company obtains additional working capital to meet its contractual commitments and maintain the current level of Company operations through debt or equity sources.

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to complete its revenue growth strategy or otherwise obtain sufficient working capital to cover ongoing cash requirements. Without sufficient cash reserves, the Company’s ability to pursue growth objectives will be adversely impacted. Furthermore, despite significant effort since July 2015, the Company has thus far been unsuccessful in achieving a stabilized source of revenues. If revenues do not increase and stabilize or if additional funds cannot otherwise be raised, the Company might be required to seek other alternatives which could include the sale of assets, closure of operations and/or protection under the U.S. bankruptcy laws. As of October 31, 2017, based on the factors described above, the Company concluded that there was substantial doubt about its ability to continue to operate as a going concern for the 12 months following the issuance of it audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended October 31, 2017.

Cash and Cash Equivalents

The following table summarizes the sources and uses of cash for the years stated. The Company held no cash equivalents for any of the periods presented.

During the year ended October 31, 2017, the Company used cash in operating activities of $881,527, compared to $542,008 for the year ended October 31, 2016. The change in cash used in operating activities was due to an increase in the net loss of during the year ended October 31, 2017 of approximately $8.1 million, partially off set by the increase in non-cash charges of $6.3 million (mostly related to stock based compensation of $5.8 million), increase in liabilities owed to management of approximately $1.4 million and other net changes to working capital of $38,000.

During the year ended October 31, 2017, the Company used cash in investing activities of $45,136, compared to $26,313 for the year ended October 31, 2016. The change in cash used in investing activities was due to purchases of equipment for the Company’s manufacturing facilities.

During the year ended October 31, 2017, the Company had cash provided by financing activities of $940,000, compared to $556,979 for the year ended October 31, 2016. The change in cash provided by financing activities was due to increases in proceeds received in connection with issuances of notes payable of $435,000 and increases in proceeds from the sale of equity of securities of approximately $50,000, partially offset from repayments of notes payable of $100,000.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

Our liquidity is not dependent on the use of off-balance sheet financing arrangements (as that term is defined in Item 303(a) (4) (ii) of Regulation S-K) and as of October 31, 2017 and through the date of this report, we had no such arrangements.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The new guidance provides new criteria for recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance requires expanded disclosures to provide greater insight into both revenue that has been recognized and revenue that is expected to be recognized in the future from existing contracts. Quantitative and qualitative information will be provided about the significant judgments and changes in those judgments that management made to determine the revenue that is recorded. This accounting standard update, as amended, will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than fiscal 2017. The Company has assessed the provisions of the guidance and has determined that there is no impact from the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. The Company will adopt the provisions of this guidance beginning in the quarter ended January 31, 2018.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The new standard requires management to assess the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Disclosures are required if there is substantial doubt as to the company’s continuation as a going concern within one year after the issue date of financial statements. The standard provides guidance for making the assessment, including consideration of management’s plans which may alleviate doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 is effective for years ending after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has adopted this standard for the year ending October 31, 2016, and management has concluded that there is substantial doubt as to the Company’s continuation as a going concern within one year after the issuance date of the financial statements.

In February 2016, a pronouncement was issued by the FASB that creates new accounting and reporting guidelines for leasing arrangements. The new guidance requires organizations that lease assets to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet related to the rights and obligations created by those leases, regardless of whether they are classified as finance or operating leases. Consistent with current guidance, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The guidance also requires new disclosures to help financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, with early application permitted. The new standard is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new pronouncement on its financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (topic 718). The FASB issued this update to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2017. The adoption of this update had no material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our audited consolidated financial statements reflect the selection and application of accounting policies which require us to make significant estimates and judgments. See Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, “Summary of Significant Accounting Policies”.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.

As a “smaller reporting company,” as defined by Item 10 of Regulation S-K, we are not required to provide the information required by this item of Form 10-K.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.

INDEX TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc.

(formerly Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc.)

Miami, Florida

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc. (the “Company”) as of October 31, 2017, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended October 31, 2017. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of October 31, 2017 and its consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the year ended October 31, 2017 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses and has a deficit in working capital, that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  

/s/ MARCUM LLP

MARCUM LLP

Houston, Texas

November 1, 2018

Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm

To the Board of Directors of Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc.

(formerly Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc.)

Miami, Florida

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc. (the “Company”) as of October 31, 2016, and the related consolidated statements of operations, changes in equity (deficit) and cash flows for the year ended October 31, 2016. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of the Company as of October 31, 2016 and its consolidated statements of operations and cash flows for the year ended October 31, 2016 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern. As discussed in Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has incurred recurring losses and has a deficit in working capital, that raise substantial doubt about its ability to continue as a going concern. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.  

/s/ GBH CPAS, PC

GBH CPAS, PC

www.gbhcpas.com

Houston, Texas

July 7, 2017

Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc.

(formerly Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc.)

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

As of October 31, 2017 and 2016

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc.

(formerly Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

For the Years Ended October 31, 2017 and 2016

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc.

(formerly Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN EQUITY (DEFICIT)

For the Years Ended October 31, 2017 and 2016  

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc.

(formerly Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc.)

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

For the Years Ended October 31, 2017 and 2016

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

ORGANICELL REGENERATIVE MEDICINE, INC.
(formerly Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc.)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – ORGANIZATION AND DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS

Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc. (formerly Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc.) (“Organicell” or the “Company”) was incorporated on August 9, 2011 in the State of Nevada. On May 29, 2015, Albert Mitrani acquired controlling interest of Organicell through the purchase of 135,000,000 shares of common stock from John Goodhew and subsequently became a director and the sole officer of Organicell. Until October 30, 2015, the Company’s business included the designing, manufacturing, and selling vending tricycles for commercial customers.

On October 30, 2015, the Company entered into a stock purchase agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with John Goodhew, the Company's director, pursuant to which all of the shares of Bespoke Tricycles, Ltd. (“Bespoke”), a corporation organized under the Laws of England and Wales, were transferred to Mr. Goodhew. As a result of such sale, the Company was no longer in the business of designing, manufacturing, and selling vending tricycles. The purchase price for the shares sold to Mr. Goodhew was $10.

On April 23, 2018, the Company and Management and Business Associates, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (“MBA”), executed a Plan and Agreement of Reorganization (“Reorganization Plan”), whereby the Company agreed to issue to MBA an aggregate of 222,425,073 shares of its common stock of the Company, representing 51% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on fully-diluted basis, for $0.001 per share (or an aggregate of $222,425), in consideration for MBA’s founder and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Manuel Iglesias’ agreement to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) and a member of the Board of the Company. The Reorganization Plan was effective as of April 13, 2018 (“Effective Date”). The Reorganization Plan also provided for the cancelation and termination of the Company’s previously issued and outstanding Series A Preferred Stock and Series B Preferred Stock. As a result of the above Reorganization Plan, Mr. Iglesias acquired controlling interest of the Company (see Note 5).

On May 21, 2018, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State of Nevada to change the Company’s name from Biotech Products Services and Research, Inc. to Organicell Regenerative Medicine, Inc., effective June 20, 2018 (the “Name Change”). As discussed in Note 12, the Name Change has not yet been effectuated in the marketplace by the Financial Industry Regulatory Agency (“FINRA”).

Since the June 2015 change in control of our Company and the July 2015 change in the Company’s operations, the Company has been engaged in the health care industry, principally focusing on supplying products and services related to the growing field of regenerative anti-aging medicine.

For the year ended October 31, 2017, the Company operated through the following wholly owned subsidiaries: General Surgical of Florida, Inc., a Florida corporation (“General Surgical”) with a business purpose to sell cellular therapy products to doctors and hospitals, Anu Life Sciences, Inc. (“ANU”), a Florida corporation with a business purpose of the development, production and manufacturing of anti-aging and cellular therapy products, Beyond Cells Corp., a Florida corporation (“Beyond Cells”) formed with a business purpose to provide anti-aging and cellular therapy patient marketing and product sales and Mint Organics, Inc. (“Mint Organics”) a Florida corporation and a 55%-owned subsidiary of the Company with a business purpose of operating Medical Marijuana Treatment Centers (“MMTC”) for defined MMTC licensed activities (see Note 15). ANU began operations during November 2016 and commenced sales of its first product offering during February 2017. Mint Organics began operations during February 2017, and also during February 2017, the Company established Mint Organics Florida, Inc., (“Mint Organics Florida”), a Florida corporation and a 96%-owned subsidiary of Mint Organics with a business purpose of operating MMTC’s for defined MMTC licensed activities within Florida.

As described in Note 4, on February 5, 2018, ANU sold or transferred to Vera Acquisition LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Vera") their right, title and interest in certain tangible and other assets associated with its manufacturing operations in exchange for a cash payment of $950,000 and the execution of a long term distribution agreement between Vera and the Company (“Sale”) which provided the Company certain exclusive and non-exclusive rights to distribute future products to be manufactured by Vera, including products that were developed and produced by ANU and additional products that may be developed and produced by Vera in the future. After the completion of the Sale, the Company remains in the business of selling and distributing regenerative biologic therapies based on amnion placental tissue derived products to doctors and hospitals but will now rely on third party supply agreements, rather than from products manufactured internally by ANU, for the supply of these advanced biologically processed cellular and tissue based products.

As of October 31, 2017, Mint Organics had not been successful in obtaining the required licenses to operate MMTC’s and had exhausted all of its working capital and therefore was unable to continue efforts towards development of that business. On April 6, 2018, Mr. Taddeo, resigned as the Chief Executive Officer and member of the Board of Directors of Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida. Mint Organics and Mint Organics Florida are currently not pursuing efforts to obtain licenses to operate MMTC’s and are considering future alternatives.

Ethan New York, Inc., a New York corporation (“Ethan NY”), formed with a business purpose of selling clothing and accessories through a retail store, closed operations during June 2016 and the results of Ethan NY are reflected as discontinued operations in the financial statements.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Basis of Presentation

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned and majority owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated.

Reclassifications

Certain prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform with the current financial statement presentation including adjusted footnotes to reflect the presentation of discontinued operations as further discussed in Note 16.

Concentrations of Credit Risk

The balance sheet items that potentially subject us to concentrations of credit risk are primarily cash and cash equivalents and accounts receivable. Balances in accounts are insured up to Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) limits of $250,000 per institution. At October 31, 2017, the Company did not have any cash balances in financial institutions in excess of FDIC insurance coverage.

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, the Company had one customer that accounted for approximately $94,130 of revenues (16.2%) and another customer accounted for approximately $93,000 of revenues (16%).

At October 31, 2017, the Company had three customers that accounted for approximately $39,000 (37%), $28,000 (26%) and $18,000 (17%) of accounts receivable, respectively.

During the fiscal year ended October 31, 2017, the Company purchased raw materials and other supplies used in manufacturing its products from one supplier totaling approximately $169,000 or 70% of the total amount of materials purchased during the period.

The Company’s sales and supply agreements are non-exclusive and the Company does not believe it has any exposure based on the customers of its products and/or the availability of raw materials and/or products from other suppliers. Since February 2017 (and up through the Sale), the Company manufactured and distributed proprietary products that reduced exposure from reliance on third party suppliers of inventory but increased exposure of reliance on raw materials and other supplies used in the manufacturing of its products.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles of the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the year. Management bases its estimates on historical experience and on other assumptions considered to be reasonable under the circumstances. However, actual results may differ from the estimates.

Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with maturities of three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.

Accounts Receivable

Accounts receivable are recorded at fair value on the date revenue is recognized. The Company provides allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses resulting from the inability of its customers to repay their obligation. If the financial condition of the Company's customers were to deteriorate, resulting in an impairment of their ability to repay, additional allowances may be required. The Company provides for potential uncollectible accounts receivable based on specific customer identification and historical collection experience adjusted for existing market conditions.

The policy for determining past due status is based on the contractual payment terms of each customer, which are generally net 30 or net 60 days. Once collection efforts by the Company and its collection agency are exhausted, the determination for charging off uncollectible receivables is made. For the year ended October 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company recorded bad debt expense of $5,250 and $500, respectively.

Inventory

Inventory is stated at the lower of cost or market using the average cost method. The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand to identify slow-moving merchandise and markdowns necessary to clear slow-moving merchandise. Estimates of markdown requirements may differ from actual results due to changes in quantity, quality and mix of products in inventory, as well as changes in consumer preferences, market and economic conditions.

Property and Equipment

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Depreciation and amortization are provided using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. The estimated useful lives of property and equipment range from 3 to 5 years. Upon sale or retirement, the cost and related accumulated depreciation and amortization are eliminated from their respective accounts, and the resulting gain or loss is included in results of operations. Repairs and maintenance charges, which do not increase the useful lives of the assets, are charged to operations as incurred.

Revenue Recognition

The Company recognizes revenue on arrangements in accordance with FASB ASC Topic. 605 “Revenue Recognition”. In all cases, revenue is recognized only when the price is fixed and determinable, persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, the service is performed and collectability of the resulting receivable is reasonably assured.

Net Income (Loss) Per Common Share

Basic income (loss) per common share is calculated by dividing the Company's net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares during the period. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing the Company's net income available to common shareholders by the diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding during the year. The diluted weighted average number of shares outstanding is the basic weighted number of shares adjusted for any potentially dilutive debt or equity.

At October 31, 2017, the Company had 158,137,484 common shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants that were not included in the computation of dilutive loss per share because their inclusion is anti-dilutive for the year ended October 31, 2017. At October 31, 2016, the Company had 1,737,484 common shares issuable upon the exercise of warrants that were not included in the computation of dilutive loss per share because their inclusion is anti-dilutive for the year ended October 31, 2016.

Stock-Based Compensation

All stock-based payments to employees, including grants of employee stock options, are recognized in the financial statements based on their fair values.

Stock options and warrants issued to consultants and other non-employees as compensation for services provided to the Company are accounted for based upon the fair value of the services provided or the estimated fair market value of the option or warrant, whichever can be more clearly determined.

Income Taxes

The Company is required to file a consolidated tax return that includes all of its subsidiaries.

Current income taxes are based on the year’s taxable income for federal and state income tax reporting purposes. Deferred income taxes are provided on a liability basis whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss carry forwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax law and rates on the date of enactment. The Company records a liability for uncertain tax positions when it is probable that a loss has been incurred and the amount can be reasonably estimated. For the years ended October 31, 2017 and 2016, the Company has incurred operating losses, and therefore, there were not any income tax expense amounts recorded during that period associated.

Since January 1, 2018, the nominal corporate tax rate in the United States of America is a flat 21 percent due to the passage of the "Tax Cuts and Jobs Act" on December 20, 2017 by the US Senate and House of Representatives. 

Valuation of Derivatives

The Company evaluates its convertible instruments, options, warrants or other contracts to determine if those contracts or embedded components of those contracts qualify as derivatives to be separately accounted for under ASC Topic 815, “Derivatives and Hedging.” The result of this accounting treatment is that the fair value of the derivative is marked-to-market each balance sheet date and recorded as a liability. In the event that the fair value is recorded as a liability, the change in fair value is recorded in the statement of operations as other income (expense). Upon conversion or exercise of a derivative instrument, the instrument is marked to fair value at the conversion date and then that fair value is reclassified to equity. Equity instruments that are initially classified as equity that become subject to reclassification under ASC Topic 815 are reclassified to liabilities at the fair value of the instrument on the reclassification date. We analyzed the derivative financial instruments in accordance with ASC 815.

The Company utilized Monte Carlo Simulation models that value the derivative liability based on a probability weighted discounted cash flow model. The Company utilized the fair value standard set forth by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, defined as the amount at which the assets (or liability) could be bought (or incurred) or sold (or settled) in a current transaction between willing parties, that is, other than in a forced or liquidation sale.

The derivative liabilities result in a reduction of the initial carrying amount (as unamortized discount) of the Convertible Notes. This derivative liability is marked-to-market each quarter with the change in fair value recorded in the income statement. Unamortized discount is amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the Convertible Note.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company includes fair value information in the notes to financial statements when the fair value of its financial instruments is different from the book value. When the book value approximates fair value, no additional disclosure is made. 

The Company follows FASB ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value and enhances disclosures about fair value measurements. It defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. ASC 820 also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The Company’s financial instruments consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable, accrued liabilities and convertible debt. The estimated fair value of cash, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying amounts due to the short-term nature of these instruments.

The Company follows the provisions of ASC 820 with respect to its financial instruments. As required by ASC 820, assets and liabilities measured at fair value are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to their fair value measurement. The Company’s convertible promissory notes (see Note 9) which are required to be measured at fair value on a recurring basis under of ASC 815 as of October 31, 2017 are all measured at fair value using Level 3 inputs. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities as of October 31, 2017: 

Level one — Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities;

Level two — Inputs other than level one inputs that are either directly or indirectly observable such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities; and

Level three — Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and developed using estimates and assumptions, which are developed by the reporting entity and reflect those assumptions that a market participant would use.

The fair value hierarchy also requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value.

Determining which category an asset or liability falls within the hierarchy requires significant judgment. The Company evaluates its hierarchy disclosures each quarter. The Company’s derivative liability is measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The Company classifies the fair value of the derivative liability under level three.

Based on ASC Topic 815 and related guidance, the Company concluded the common stock issuable pursuant to conversion of the convertible promissory notes are required to be accounted for as derivatives as of the issue date due to a reset feature on the exercise price. At the date of issuance common stock derivative liabilities were measured at fair value using either quoted market prices of financial instruments with similar characteristics or other valuation techniques. The Company records the fair value of these derivatives on its balance sheet at fair value with changes in the values of these derivatives reflected in the consolidated statements of operations as “change in fair value of derivative liabilities.” These derivative instruments are not designated as hedging instruments under ASC 815-10 and are disclosed on the balance sheet under Derivative Liabilities.

Further, and in accordance with ASC 815, the embedded derivatives are revalued using a Monte Carlo Simulation model at issuance and at each balance sheet date and marked to fair value with the corresponding adjustment as a “gain or loss on change in fair values” in the consolidated statement of operations. As of October 31, 2017, the fair value of the derivative liabilities included on the accompanying consolidated balance sheet was $663,598. During the year ended October 31, 2017, the Company recognized a gain on change in the fair value totaling $95,971.

The Company classifies the fair value of these securities under level three of the fair value hierarchy of financial instruments. The following table presents liabilities that are measured and recognized at fair value as of October 31, 2017 on a recurring and non-recurring basis:

Changes in the unobservable input values would likely cause material changes in the fair value of the Company’s Level 3 financial instruments.

Subsequent Events

The Company has evaluated subsequent events that occurred after October 31, 2017 through the financial statement issuance date for subsequent event disclosure consideration.

New Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2014-09, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606).” The new guidance provides new criteria for recognizing revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in amounts that reflect the consideration to which the company expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. The new guidance requires expanded disclosures to provide greater insight into both revenue that has been recognized and revenue that is expected to be recognized in the future from existing contracts. Quantitative and qualitative information will be provided about the significant judgments and changes in those judgments that management made to determine the revenue that is recorded. This accounting standard update, as amended, will be effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017. The new revenue standard may be applied retrospectively to each prior period presented or retrospectively with the cumulative effect recognized as of the date of adoption. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than fiscal 2017. The Company has assessed the provisions of the guidance and has determined that there is no impact from the adoption of this guidance on its consolidated financial statements. The Company will adopt the provisions of this guidance beginning in the quarter ended January 31, 2018.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern. The new standard requires management to assess the company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Disclosures are required if there is substantial doubt as to the company’s continuation as a going concern within one year after the issue date of financial statements. The standard provides guidance for making the assessment, including consideration of management’s plans, which may alleviate doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. ASU 2014-15 is effective for years ending after December 15, 2016. Early adoption is permitted. The Company has adopted this standard for the year ending October 31, 2017, and management has concluded that there is substantial doubt as to the Company’s continuation as a going concern within one year after the issuance date of the financial statements.

In February 2016, a pronouncement was issued by the FASB that creates new accounting and reporting guidelines for leasing arrangements. The new guidance requires organizations that lease assets to recognize assets and liabilities on the balance sheet related to the rights and obligations created by those leases, regardless of whether they are classified as finance or operating leases. Consistent with current guidance, the recognition, measurement, and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease primarily will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. The guidance also requires new disclosures to help financial statement users better understand the amount, timing, and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases. The new standard is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within that reporting period, with early application permitted. The new standard is to be applied using a modified retrospective approach. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the new pronouncement on its financial statements.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation” (topic 718). The FASB issued this update to improve the accounting for employee share-based payments and affect all organizations that issue share based payment awards to their employees. Several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment award transactions are simplified, including: (a) income tax consequences; (b) classification of awards as either equity or liabilities; and (c) classification on the statement of cash flows. The updated guidance is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the update is permitted. The Company adopted this guidance in the first quarter of 2017. The adoption of this update had no material effect on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

The Company does not expect the adoption of recently issued accounting pronouncements to have a significant impact on the Company's results of operations, financial position or cash flow.

NOTE 3 – GOING CONCERN

The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has had limited revenues since its inception. The Company incurred a net loss of $9,112,519 for the year ended October 31, 2017. In addition, the Company had an accumulated deficit of $11,085,743 at October 31, 2017. The Company had a negative working capital position of $3,599,915 at October 31, 2017. The Company’s efforts to establish a stabilized source of sufficient revenues to cover operating costs has yet to be achieved and ultimately may prove to be unsuccessful unless additional sources of working capital through operations or debt and/or equity financings are realized. These financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern.

Management anticipates that the Company will remain dependent, for the near future, on additional investment capital to fund ongoing operating expenses. As a result of the Sale, the Company does not have any assets to pledge for the purpose of borrowing additional capital. In addition, the Company relies on non-exclusive supply arrangements to obtain the supply of the products it currently sells and distributes to its customers. The Company’s current market capitalization and common stock liquidity will hinder its ability to raise equity proceeds. The Company anticipates that future sources of funding, if any, will therefore be costly and dilutive. if available at all.

In view of the matters described in the preceding paragraphs, recoverability of the recorded asset amounts shown in the accompanying consolidated balance sheet assumes that (1) the Company will be able to establish a stabilized source of revenues, (2) obligations to the Company’s creditors are not accelerated, (3) the Company’s operating expenses remain at current levels and/or the Company is successful in restructuring and/or deferring ongoing obligations, (4) the Company is able to continue to obtain products under current supply arrangements or from other suppliers with similar terms and conditions, and (5) the Company obtains additional working capital to meet its contractual commitments and maintain the current level of Company operations through debt or equity sources.

There is no assurance that the Company will be able to complete its revenue growth strategy or otherwise obtain sufficient working capital to cover ongoing cash requirements. Without sufficient cash reserves, the Company’s ability to pursue growth objectives will be adversely impacted. Furthermore, despite significant effort since July 2015, the Company has thus far been unsuccessful in achieving a stabilized source of revenues. If revenues do not increase and stabilize or if additional funds cannot otherwise be raised, the Company might be required to seek other alternatives which could include the sale of assets, closure of operations and/or protection under the U.S. bankruptcy laws. As of October 31, 2017, based on the factors described above, the Company concluded that there was substantial doubt about its ability to continue to operate as a going concern for the 12 months following the issuance of these financial statements.

NOTE 4 – SALE AND TRANSFER OF ANU MANUFACTURING ASSETS

Effective February 5, 2018 (“Closing Date”), Vera Acquisition LLC, a Utah limited liability company ("Vera"), Organicell, ANU and General Surgical, executed an Asset Purchase Agreement ("Purchase Agreement") pursuant to which ANU sold to Vera (“Sale”) their right, title and interest in certain tangible and other assets associated with its manufacturing operations, including, prepaid expenses, raw and finished goods inventory, a long term lease for ANU’s laboratory facility in Sunrise, Florida (including associated security deposits), furniture and equipment, and certain intellectual property rights and General Surgical transferred its rights to certain third-party distribution agreements between General Surgical and distributors of products manufactured by ANU (“Sold Assets”) in exchange for a cash payment of $950,000 and the execution of a long term distribution agreement with Organicell (“Organicell Distribution Agreement”) described below. In connection with the Sale, Vera received credit for $100,000 previously paid to ANU for prepaid product supply which was not yet delivered to Vera as of the Closing Date.

In connection with the Sale, the Company was required to use cash proceeds from the Sale to satisfy and extinguish all of the Notes outstanding related to the SPA as of the date of the Sale, totaling approximately $762,477 (comprised of $527,778 of face value of the Notes outstanding, $8,589 of accrued and unpaid interest from January 1, 2018 through the date of the Sale, $211,111 of prepayment penalties and $15,000 for reimbursement of legal fees), which were secured by a first priority lien on all of the Company’s assets, and to be used to pay all of ANU’s remaining trade accounts payable outstanding as of the Closing Date. In addition, the Purchase Agreement required ANU to fund the placental donor tissue costs that were required by Vera to process additional product subsequent to the Closing to replace the shortfall of the actual inventory product amounts as of the Closing Date and the specified inventory quantities provided for in the Purchase Agreement. The Purchase Agreement also required ANU to escrow $47,500 (5%) of the cash purchase price and for General Surgical to escrow, subsequent to the Closing Date, up to $47,500 from collections of accounts receivable that were existing as of the Closing Date for a period of 90 days subsequent to the Closing Date to cover pre-closing related liabilities of ANU that were not identified as of the Closing Date, if any, and other obligations of ANU associated with the Purchase Agreement. Vera is obligated to repay to the Company the net portion of the escrowed amounts held by Vera that are remaining upon the expiration of the 90 day escrow period and upon such time that the Company delivers a certificate of compliance from the State of Florida that there are no taxes owing to the State of Florida by ANU related to activities prior to Sale or the transfer of the Sold Assets. The Purchase Agreement also required the Company to indemnify Vera for future claims made against Vera related to activities of ANU occurring prior to the Closing Date. In connection with the Sale, the Company and the Company’s executives as of the date of the Sale, executed non-competition covenant agreements whereby each party, including their affiliates, agreed under certain circumstances, not to engage directly or by assisting others in conducting activities competitive with Vera (defined as distributing, manufacturing, designing or engineering placental tissue-based products), except in a capacity of performing the activities related to the Organicell Distribution Agreement.

Effective upon the closing of the Sale, the Chief Operating Officer (“COO”) and Chief Technical Officer (“CTO”) each entered into a separation and general release agreement with the Company, which provided for the immediate resignation of the COO and CTO of all their respective executive and board of director positions held with Organicell and/or any of Organicell’s subsidiaries, and settlement of all obligations of each party to the other pursuant to the respective employment agreements, including the release of all rights the Company may have held in any intellectual property of the COO and CTO and any non-compete restrictions on the COO and CTO. In connection with such releases, each of the COO and CTO agreed to forfeit all warrants previously granted and outstanding (a total of 77,150,000 warrants to purchase shares of common stock of the Company), forfeit any and all accrued and unpaid amounts owing under the employment agreements for past due wages, benefits, severance obligations, unreimbursed expenses and any other obligations owing to one another as of the Closing Date in exchange for a grant of 7,500,000 newly issued shares of restricted common stock of the Company to each of the COO and CTO, with a fair value of $82,500, based on the closing price of the common stock of the Company on the date of the Sale.

In connection with the Sale, ANU and General Surgical retained all cash on-hand as of the Closing Date and General Surgical retained all accounts receivable existing at the Closing Date, trademarks and inventory associated with the distribution of its “Organicell” product, and certain agreements between General Surgical and distributors of the ANU products that General Surgical intends to continue to supply after the Closing Date pursuant to the Organicell Distribution Agreement. After the completion of the Sale, the Company remains in the business of selling and distributing regenerative biologic therapies based on amnion placental tissue derived products to doctors and hospitals but will now rely on the Organicell Distribution Agreement, rather than from products manufactured internally by ANU, for the supply of these advanced biologically processed cellular and tissue based products, including those same products previously produced by ANU and newly developed products that may become available from Vera or other suppliers in the future.

Organicell Distribution Agreement

In connection with the Sale, the Company and Vera entered into a long-term distribution agreement (“Organicell Distribution Agreement”) which provided Organicell, or its designees, certain exclusive and non-exclusive rights to distribute future products to be manufactured by Vera, including products that were developed and produced by ANU prior to the Closing Date and additional products that may be developed and produced by Vera in the future. The initial term of the Organicell Distribution Agreement is for three years and is automatically renewed for additional one-year periods, subject to Organicell meeting minimum volume purchase requirements. The Organicell Distribution Agreement provides pricing for those products which were produced and available from ANU at the time of the Sale, and discounts based on Organicell achieving minimum monthly purchase volumes. Under the terms of the Organicell Distribution Agreement, the Company was obligated to purchase the Vera products identified at the time of the Sale, provided they are available to be purchased from Vera and/or new products developed after the time of the Sale, provided that the Company and Vera can mutually agree on the terms for the sale of the new product offerings.

During August 2018, Vera notified the Company that it was no longer in the business originally acquired in connection with the Sale and that it was no longer able to supply products to the Company under the Organicell Distribution Agreement. As a result, the Company is currently relying on short-term supply agreements with other third party manufacturers to provide it with the products it currently distributes.

NOTE 5 – REORGANIZATION PLAN

On April 23, 2018, the Company and MBA, executed a Plan and Agreement of Reorganization (“Reorganization Plan”) whereby the Company agreed to issue to MBA an aggregate of 222,425,073 shares of its common stock, representing 51% of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Company on fully-diluted basis, for $0.001 per share (or an aggregate of $222,425), in consideration for MBA’s founder and Chief Executive Officer, Mr. Manuel Iglesias’ agreement to serve as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and a member of the Board of the Company. The Reorganization Plan was effective as of April 13, 2018.

Under the terms of the Reorganization Plan, as of the Effective Date:

As a result of the above transactions, MBA has a controlling interest in the voting and equity interests of the Company.

NOTE 6 – INVENTORIES

Inventories totaled $119,555 and $9,944 at October 31, 2017 and October 31, 2016, respectively.

As described in Note 4, in connection with the Sale, ANU sold or transferred to Vera its right, title and interest in the manufacturing related inventories that were on hand as of the date of the Sale.

NOTE 7 - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Depreciation expense of property, plant and equipment from operations totaled $19,315 and $345 for the years ended October 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

As described in Note 4, in connection with the Sale, ANU sold or transferred to Vera its right, title and interest in the manufacturing related equipment existing as of the date of the Sale.

NOTE 8 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS