ORIGINCLEAR, INC. - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
Form
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13
OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
FOR THE
QUARTERLY PERIOD
ENDED: JUNE 30,
2010
|
¨
|
TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION
13 OR 15(d) OF THE EXCHANGE
ACT
|
FOR THE
TRANSITION PERIOD FROM __________ TO __________
COMMISSION
FILE NUMBER ________________
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
26-0287664
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
5645
West Adams Blvd
Los
Angeles, CA 90016
(Address
of principal executive offices, Zip Code)
(323)
939-6645
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x No
¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding
12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit
and post such files). Yes ¨
No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and
“smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
¨
|
Accelerated
filer
|
¨
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
¨
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
x
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No
x
The
number of shares of registrant’s common stock outstanding, as of August 12,
2010 was 161,841,878.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1. Financial Statements
|
1
|
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis or
Plan of Operation
|
9
|
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk
|
16
|
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
|
16
|
PART
II - OTHER INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
|
17
|
Item
2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities
and Use of Proceeds
|
17
|
Item
3. Defaults Upon Senior
Securities
|
17
|
Item
4. Reserved
|
17
|
Item
5. Other Information
|
17
|
Item
6. Exhibits
|
17
|
SIGNATURES
|
18
|
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements.
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
BALANCE
SHEETS
June 30, 2010
|
December 31, 2009
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
CURRENT
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Cash
& cash equivalents
|
$ | 106,837 | $ | 356,179 | ||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
124,786 | 32,867 | ||||||
Other
receivables
|
4,400 | - | ||||||
TOTAL
CURRENT ASSETS
|
236,023 | 389,046 | ||||||
PROPERTY
& EQUIPMENT
|
||||||||
Machinery
& equipment
|
1,372 | 1,372 | ||||||
Furniture
& fixtures
|
27,056 | 27,056 | ||||||
Computer
equipment
|
23,340 | 22,268 | ||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
94,914 | 94,914 | ||||||
146,682 | 145,610 | |||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(95,883 | ) | (68,898 | ) | ||||
NET
PROPERTY & EQUIPMENT
|
50,799 | 76,712 | ||||||
OTHER
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Patent
|
59,833 | 45,636 | ||||||
Trademark
|
4,467 | 4,467 | ||||||
Security
deposit
|
9,650 | 9,650 | ||||||
TOTAL
OTHER ASSETS
|
73,950 | 59,753 | ||||||
TOTAL
ASSETS
|
$ | 360,772 | $ | 525,511 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
CURRENT
LIABILITIES
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 17,246 | $ | 1,391 | ||||
Accrued
expenses
|
43,229 | 52,985 | ||||||
Credit
card payable
|
1,135 | 470 | ||||||
Other
payables
|
12,187 | 872 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES
|
73,797 | 55,718 | ||||||
SHAREHOLDERS'
EQUITY
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $0.0001 par value; 50,000 authorized preferred
shares
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, $0.0001 par value; 500,000,000 authorized common
shares 161,841,878 and 159,321,232 shares issued and
outstanding
|
16,185 | 15,933 | ||||||
Additional
paid in capital
|
7,928,069 | 7,160,260 | ||||||
Common
stock subscription payable
|
700,036 | 161,040 | ||||||
Deficit
accumulated during the development stage
|
(8,357,315 | ) | (6,867,440 | ) | ||||
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
286,975 | 469,793 | ||||||
TOTAL
LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
$ | 360,772 | $ | 525,511 |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these financial statements
1
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS
OF OPERATIONS
(Unaudited)
From
Inception
|
||||||||||||||||||||
June
1, 2007
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Six
Months Ended
|
through
|
||||||||||||||||||
June
30, 2010
|
June
30, 2009
|
June
30, 2010
|
June
30, 2009
|
June
30, 2010
|
||||||||||||||||
REVENUE
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||||||
General
& Administrative expense
|
613,737 | 669,956 | 1,117,045 | 1,195,951 | 6,894,917 | |||||||||||||||
Research
& development
|
186,085 | 90,695 | 345,884 | 221,912 | 1,406,484 | |||||||||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization expense
|
15,489 | 13,943 | 26,984 | 27,886 | 95,883 | |||||||||||||||
TOTAL
OPERATING EXPENSES
|
815,311 | 774,594 | 1,489,913 | 1,445,749 | 8,397,284 | |||||||||||||||
LOSS
FROM OPERATIONS BEFORE OTHER INCOME/(EXPENSE)
|
(815,311 | ) | (774,594 | ) | (1,489,913 | ) | (1,445,749 | ) | (8,397,284 | ) | ||||||||||
OTHER
INCOME/(EXPENSE)
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
2 | 5 | 6 | 22 | 13,675 | |||||||||||||||
Dividend
income
|
7 | 58 | 32 | 769 | 26,648 | |||||||||||||||
Capital
gains
|
- | - | - | - | 107 | |||||||||||||||
Penalties
|
- | - | - | (86 | ) | (86 | ) | |||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
- | - | - | - | (375 | ) | ||||||||||||||
- | - | |||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL
OTHER INCOME
|
9 | 63 | 38 | 705 | 39,969 | |||||||||||||||
NET
LOSS
|
$ | (815,302 | ) | $ | (774,531 | ) | $ | (1,489,875 | ) | $ | (1,445,044 | ) | $ | (8,357,315 | ) | |||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED LOSS PER SHARE
|
$ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | (0.01 | ) | ||||||||
WEIGHTED-AVERAGE
COMMON SHARES OUTSTANDING
|
||||||||||||||||||||
BASIC
AND DILUTED
|
161,841,878 | 147,210,610 | 160,795,052 | 145,703,702 |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these financial statements
2
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
STATEMENT
OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY
Deficit
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Common
|
during
the
|
||||||||||||||||||||||
Common
stock
|
Paid-in
|
Stock
|
Development
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Payable
|
Stage
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2009
|
159,321,232 | $ | 15,933 | $ | 7,160,260 | $ | 161,040 | $ | (6,867,440 | ) | $ | 469,793 | ||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for subscription payable in March 2010 (732,000
shares issued at $0.22 per share) (Unaudited)
|
732,000 | 73 | 160,967 | (161,040 | ) | - | - | |||||||||||||||||
Issuance
of common stock for cash in March 2010 (1,788,646 shares issued
at $0.22 per share) (Unaudited)
|
1,788,646 | 179 | 393,304 | - | - | 393,483 | ||||||||||||||||||
Cash
received for common stock subscription payable (Unaudited)
|
- | - | - | 700,036 | - | 700,036 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock
compensation expense (Unaudited)
|
- | - | 216,840 | - | - | 216,840 | ||||||||||||||||||
Stock
issuance cost (Unaudited)
|
- | - | (3,302 | ) | - | - | (3,302 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Net
loss for the six months ended June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
- | - | - | - | (1,489,875 | ) | (1,489,875 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Balance
at June 30, 2010 (Unaudited)
|
161,841,878 | $ | 16,185 | $ | 7,928,069 | $ | 700,036 | $ | (8,357,315 | ) | $ | 286,975 |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these financial statements
3
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
STATEMENTS
OF CASH FLOWS
(Unaudited)
From
Inception
|
||||||||||||
June
1, 2007
|
||||||||||||
Six
Months Ended
|
through
|
|||||||||||
June 30, 2010
|
June 30, 2009
|
June 30, 2010
|
||||||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Net
loss
|
$ | (1,489,875 | ) | $ | (1,445,044 | ) | $ | (8,357,315 | ) | |||
Adjustment
to reconcile net loss to net cash
|
||||||||||||
used
in operating activities
|
||||||||||||
Depreciation
& amortization
|
26,984 | 27,886 | 95,883 | |||||||||
Contributed
capital by investor
|
- | - | 375 | |||||||||
Common
stock issued for services
|
- | - | 5,000 | |||||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
216,840 | - | 2,428,146 | |||||||||
Changes
in Assets and Liabilities
|
||||||||||||
(Increase)
Decrease in:
|
||||||||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
(91,919 | ) | 9,043 | (124,786 | ) | |||||||
Other
receivables
|
(4,400 | ) | - | (4,400 | ) | |||||||
Other
assets
|
- | - | (9,650 | ) | ||||||||
Increase
(Decrease) in:
|
||||||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
15,855 | (14,385 | ) | 17,246 | ||||||||
Accrued
expenses
|
(9,756 | ) | 2,117 | 43,229 | ||||||||
Credit
card payable
|
665 | (2,304 | ) | 1,135 | ||||||||
Other
payable
|
11,316 | (17,405 | ) | 12,187 | ||||||||
NET
CASH USED IN OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
(1,324,290 | ) | (1,440,092 | ) | (5,892,950 | ) | ||||||
CASH
FLOWS USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Patent
and trademark expenditures
|
(14,197 | ) | (5,789 | ) | (59,833 | ) | ||||||
Purchase
of fixed assets
|
(1,072 | ) | (4,704 | ) | (146,682 | ) | ||||||
NET
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(15,269 | ) | (10,493 | ) | (206,515 | ) | ||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||||||
Proceeds
from common stock subscription payable
|
700,036 | 1,151,350 | 1,665,276 | |||||||||
Proceeds
for issuance of common stock, net
|
390,181 | 100,000 | 4,541,026 | |||||||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
1,090,217 | 1,251,350 | 6,206,302 | |||||||||
NET
INCREASE/(DECREASE) IN CASH
|
(249,342 | ) | (199,235 | ) | 106,837 | |||||||
CASH
& CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING OF PERIOD
|
356,179 | 580,055 | - | |||||||||
CASH
& CASH EQUIVALENTS, END OF PERIOD
|
$ | 106,837 | $ | 380,820 | $ | 106,837 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
||||||||||||
Interest
paid
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | - | ||||||
Taxes
paid
|
$ | 800 | $ | 800 | $ | 1,600 | ||||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
SCHEDULE OF NON-CASH TRANSACTIONS
|
||||||||||||
Stock
issued for marketing services
|
$ | - | $ | - | $ | 105,705 |
The accompanying notes are an integral
part of these financial statements
4
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-UNAUDITED
JUNE 30,
2010
1.
|
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
|
The
accompanying unaudited financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and
Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of
the information and footnotes required by generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management,
all normal recurring adjustments considered necessary for a fair presentation
have been included. Operating results for the six month period ended
June 30, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected
for the year ending December 31, 2010. For further information refer
to the financial statements and footnotes thereto included in the Company's Form
10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Going
Concern
The
accompanying financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis of
accounting, which contemplates continuity of operations, realization of assets
and liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business. The
accompanying financial statements do not reflect any adjustments that might
result if the Company is unable to continue as a going concern. The
Company does not generate significant revenue, and has negative cash flows from
operations, which raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to
continue as a going concern. The ability of the Company to continue
as a going concern and appropriateness of using the going concern basis is
dependent upon, among other things, additional cash infusion. As
discussed in Note 3, the Company has obtained funds from its shareholders since
its inception through June 30, 2010. Management believes this funding will
continue, and is also actively seeking new investors. Management
believes the existing shareholders and the prospective new investors
will provide the additional cash needed to meet the Company’s obligations
as they become due, and will allow the development of its core of
business.
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
This
summary of significant accounting policies of OriginOil, Inc. is presented to
assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial
statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is
responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies
conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of
America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial
statements.
Development Stage Activities
and Operations
The
Company has been in its initial stages of formation and for the six months ended
June 30, 2010, had no revenues. A development stage activity is one in which all
efforts are devoted substantially to establishing a new business and even if
planned principal operations have commenced, revenues are
insignificant.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company will recognize revenue when services are performed, and at the time of
shipment of products, provided that evidence of an arrangement exists, title and
risk of loss have passed to the customer, fees are fixed or determinable, and
collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. To date, the Company
has had no revenues and is in the development stage.
Cash and Cash
Equivalent
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments with an original maturity of
three months or less to be cash equivalents.
Loss per Share
Calculations
Loss per
Share dictates the calculation of basic earnings per share and diluted earnings
per share. Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing income available to
common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares available.
Diluted earnings per share is computed similar to basic earnings per share
except that the denominator is increased to include the number of additional
common shares that would have been outstanding if the potential common shares
had been issued and if the additional common shares were dilutive. No shares for
employee options or warrants were used in the calculation of the loss per share
as they were all anti-dilutive. The Company’s diluted loss per share is the
same as the basic loss per share for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, as the inclusion of any potential shares would have had an anti-dilutive
effect due to the Company generating a loss.
5
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-UNAUDITED
JUNE 30,
2010
2.
|
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
(Continued)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
Share
based payments applies to transactions in which an entity exchanges its equity
instruments for goods or services, and also applies to liabilities an entity may
incur for goods or services that are to follow a fair value of those equity
instruments. We will be required to follow a fair value approach using an
option-pricing model, such as the Black Scholes option valuation model, at the
date of a stock option grant. The deferred compensation calculated under the
fair value method would then be amortized over the respective vesting period of
the stock option. The adoption of share based compensation has no material
impact on our results of operations.
Reclassification
Certain
expenses for the period ended June 30, 2009 were reclassified to conform with
the expenses for the period ended June 30, 2010.
Recently Issued Accounting
Pronouncements
Management
reviewed accounting pronouncements issued during the six months ended June 30,
2010, and no pronouncements were adopted during the period.
3.
|
CAPITAL
STOCK
|
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 2,520,646 shares of
common stock at a price of $0.22 per share for $554,523 in cash; received
$200,000 of common stock subscription at a price of $0.11 per share to purchase
1,818,181 shares of common stock. Also, the Company received $500,036 of common
stock subscriptions at a price of $0.22 per share through a private placement to
purchase 2,272,891 shares of common stock, collectively with Class A warrants to
purchase one share of common stock exercisable at a price of $0.25 per share
within six months or Class B warrants to purchase one share of common stock
exercisable at a price of $0.35 per share within three years after the
completion of this offering. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the
Company issued 4,521,000 shares of common stock at a price of $0.20 per share
for cash of $904,200. Also, the Company received $1,151,350 in common stock
subscription to purchase 5,756,750 shares of common stock through a private
placement.
6
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-UNAUDITED
JUNE 30,
2010
4.
|
STOCK
OPTIONS AND WARRANTS
|
The
Company adopted a Stock Option Plan for the purposes of granting stock options
to its employees and others providing services to the Company, which reserves
and sets aside for the granting of Options for Fifteen Million (15,000,000)
shares of Common Stock. Options granted under the Plan may be either
Incentive Options or Nonqualified Options and shall be administered by the
Company's Board of Directors ("Board"). Each Option shall be
exercisable to the nearest whole share, in installments or otherwise, as the
respective Option agreements may provide. Notwithstanding any other provision of
the Plan or of any Option agreement, each Option shall expire on the date
specified in the Option agreement, which date shall not be later than the tenth
(10th)
anniversary from the effective date of this option. The stock
options vest as follows: 1/48 every 30 days thereafter until the remaining stock
options have vested. The stock options are exercisable for a period of five
years from the date of grant at an exercise price between $0.23 and $0.32 per
share.
6/30/2010
|
||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
1.98%-2.29 | % | ||
Stock
volatility factor
|
1 | % | ||
Weighted
average expected option life
|
5
years
|
|||
Expected
dividend yield
|
None
|
A summary of the Company’s stock option
activity and related information follows:
6/30/2010
|
||||||||
Weighted
|
||||||||
Number
|
average
|
|||||||
of
|
exercise
|
|||||||
Options
|
price
|
|||||||
Outstanding,
beginning of period
|
4,150,000 | $ | 0.31 | |||||
Granted
|
2,850,000 | 0.23 | ||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | ||||||
Expired
|
(360,000 | ) | - | |||||
Outstanding,
end of period
|
6,640,000 | $ | 0.30 | |||||
Exercisable
at the end of period
|
891,874 | $ | 0.28 | |||||
Weighted
average fair value of options granted during the period
|
$ | - |
The
stock-based compensation expense recognized in the statement of operations
during the six months ended June 30, 2010 is $216,840.
Warrants
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued 1,020,000 warrants with a
fair value of $122,800 determined using the Black Scholes pricing
model.
6/30/2010
|
||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
2.41% - 2.5 | % | ||
Stock
volatility factor
|
1 | % | ||
Weighted
average expected option life
|
5
years
|
|||
Expected
dividend yield
|
None
|
7
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
(A
Development Stage Company)
NOTES TO
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS-UNAUDITED
JUNE 30,
2010
4.
|
STOCK
OPTIONS AND WARRANTS (Continued)
|
During
the six months ended June 30, 2010, the Company issued warrants for services. A
summary of the Company’s warrant activity and related information
follows:
June 30, 2010
|
||||||||
Weighted
|
||||||||
average
|
||||||||
exercise
|
||||||||
Options
|
price
|
|||||||
Outstanding
-beginning of period
|
12,000,000 | $ | 0.31 | |||||
Granted
|
1,020,000 | 0.24 | ||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | ||||||
Forfeited
|
- | - | ||||||
Outstanding
- end of period
|
13,020,000 | $ | 0.27 |
5.
|
SUBSEQUENT
EVENTS
|
Management
evaluated subsequent events as of the date of the financial statements pursuant
to TOPIC 855.
As of 1
June 2010, the Company executed a purchase order with MBD Energy Limited for the
sale of equipment in the amount of $108,000. The Company will provide
listed products to the Customer on a one year lease-to-own basis, comprising a
total of four escalating payments per product to be made quarterly in
advance. The Company has received as of August 2010, the first
quarterly payment of $4,500 on account that was due within five (5)
business days after notifying the Customer of the availability of one of the
products.
8
Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis
or Plan of Operation.
This Form
10-K contains forward-looking statements that are subject to a number of risks
and uncertainties, many of which are beyond our control, which may include
statements about our:
●
|
business
strategy;
|
|
●
|
financial
strategy;
|
|
●
|
intellectual
property;
|
|
●
|
production;
|
|
●
|
future
operating results; and
|
|
●
|
plans,
objectives, expectations and intentions contained in this report that are
not historical.
|
All
statements, other than statements of historical fact included in this report,
regarding our strategy, intellectual property, future operations, financial
position, estimated revenues and losses, projected costs, prospects, plans and
objectives of management are forward-looking statements. When used in this
report, the words “could,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “intend,” “estimate,”
“expect,” “project” and similar expressions are intended to identify
forward-looking statements, although not all forward-looking statements contain
such identifying words. All forward-looking statements speak only as of the date
of this report. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking
statements. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations
reflected in or suggested by the forward-looking statements we make in this
report are reasonable, we can give no assurance that these plans, intentions or
expectations will be achieved. These statements may be found under
“Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations,” ”Business,” “Properties,” as well as in this report
generally. Actual events or results may differ materially from those
discussed in forward-looking statements as a result of various factors,
including, without limitation, the risks outlined under “Risk Factors” and
matters described in this report generally. In light of these risks and
uncertainties, there can be no assurance that the forward-looking statements
contained in this filing will in fact occur.
Organizational
History
The
Company was incorporated on June 1, 2007 under the laws of the State of
Nevada. We have only been engaged in our current and proposed
business operations since June 2007, and to date, we have been primarily
involved in research and development activities. Our principal
offices are located at 5645 West Adams Blvd., Los Angeles, California 90016. Our
telephone number is (323) 939-6645. Our website address is www.originoil.com.
Our website and the information contained on our website are not
incorporated into this Memorandum.
Overview
of Business
The
Company is currently developing a technology to produce a bio-fuel from algae
through a cost-effective, high-speed manufacturing process to replace petroleum
in various applications such as diesel, gasoline, jet fuel, plastics and
solvents. Algae, unlike other bio-fuel feedstock such as corn and
sugarcane, do not destroy vital farmlands and rainforests, disrupt global food
supplies and create new environmental problems.
The
Company’s industrial process, with its patent pending devices and methods,
optimizes this environment to help algae cells grow at their natural maximum
rate - achieving a doubling of the algae population in as little as a few hours.
The process then goes on to control the harvesting and oil extraction cycles in
a high-speed, round-the-clock, streamlined industrial production of algae
oil. Instead of waiting hundreds of millions years for algae to
become oil, the Company’s breakthrough technology and process can transform
algae into oil in a matter of days.
The
Company’s business model is based on licensing this technology to customers such
as fuel refiners, chemical and oil companies. The Company is not in
the business of producing and marketing oil or fuel, based on algae, as an end
product.
We have
only been engaged in our current and proposed business operations since June
2007, and to date, we have been primarily involved in research and development
activities. We are a development stage company and presently, we do not have
revenues related to the manufacture of our products. Our auditors have prepared
our financial statements assuming that we will continue as a going concern. We
have not generated any revenue, and we have negative cash flows from operations,
which raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going
concern.
9
Algae
Oil Industry Overview and OriginOil’s System
Algae can
take many forms, such as seaweed (macro-algae) and kelp. But for oil, we use
micro-algae as found in outdoor ponds. Micro-algae is actually a highly
efficient biological factory capable of consuming carbon dioxide (CO2), and
converting it into a high-density natural oil through
photosynthesis.
Much of
the world's petroleum is actually made up of algae that decomposed over hundreds
of millions of years. But by drilling for, extracting, and burning that oil now,
we are releasing the carbon dioxide that was absorbed long ago. This "carbon
positive" effect is what causes global warming.
Currently,
industrialized societies are emitting phenomenal quantities of CO2 into the
atmosphere and this will take many years to slow significantly. It should be a
global policy priority to find the most efficient way to reabsorb that CO2.
Aquatic plants like algae are by far the most efficient CO2 absorbers on our
planet; they do little else. Algae, then, provides the most rational way to
mitigate our problems with CO2 (and other pollutants), thus easing the danger of
fossil fuels and providing a ready alternate stream of carbon-neutral fuels and
chemicals. Algae cultivated today absorbs CO2 from the atmosphere or
other CO2 emitted sources. Burning freshly produced algae oil releases
only what it absorbed in the first place, resulting in a balanced "carbon
neutral" effect. This makes algae oil an environment-friendly oil.
Oil
Generation from Algae
Algae
reproduce by cellular division. They divide and divide until they fill the space
available to them and have consumed all nutrients in it.
In the
right environment, fresh algae cells grow and divide exponentially, doubling
every few hours, while absorbing all available nutrients, CO2 and light energy.
An
Industrial Process for Algae
OriginOil's
industrial process, with its patent pending devices and methods, optimizes this
environment to help algae cells grow at their natural maximum rate - achieving a
doubling of the algae population in as little as a few hours. The process then
goes on to control the harvesting and oil extraction cycles in a high-speed,
round-the-clock, streamlined industrial production of algae oil.
Instead
of waiting hundreds of millions years for algae to become oil, OriginOil's
breakthrough technology and process can transform algae into oil in a matter of
days.
Operating
at the Quantum Level
OriginOil’s
patent-pending technology, Quantum Fracturing, is based on the science of mass
transfer and fluid fracturing and addresses some of the challenges of
industrializing algae oil production.
A quantum
is the smallest quantity of some physical property that a system can possess. We
use the term to illustrate how we fracture the nutrient delivery environment
into very small parts, down to a micron, or a millionth of a meter. Using
Quantum Fracturing, water, carbon dioxide and other nutrients are fractured at
very high pressure to create a slurry of micron-sized nutrition-bubbles, which
is then channeled to the algae culture awaiting it in a lower-pressure growth
vessel, the Helix BioReactor™.
This
process achieves total and instantaneous distribution of nutrients to the algae
culture without fluid disruption or aeration. The pressure differentials between
the two zones substantially increase contact and exchange between the micronized
nutrients and the algae culture.
Ultimate
Oil Production Efficiency
The
increased contact between culture and nutrients makes for very high absorption
of CO2 and nutrients in the growth phase and most
importantly, by increasing the CO2 absorption during this phase, the algae cell
will produce a much greater volume of hydrocarbons (oil).
10
Two
Stages of Algae Production
OriginOil’s
patent-pending algae oil production system employs Quantum Fracturing in two
major stages of algae production:
Growth
Stage:
CO2 and
nutrients are fractured into a micro-bubble slurry and injected directly into
the algae culture for complete contact and nutrient absorption.
Extraction
Stage:
Water and
special catalysts are fractured at high ultrasonic intensity, using very little
energy, to crack the algae membrane to facilitate extracting its oil
content.
Quantum
Fracturing technology greatly enhances the efficiency of algae production and
makes it cost-effective and viable.
The
Ultimate Algae Growth Environment
The heart
of the OriginOil system is the Helix BioReactor™, an advanced algae growth
system that can grow multiple layers of algae biomass around-the-clock with
daily harvests.
In a
natural pond, the sun only illuminates one layer of algae growth, down to about
half an inch below the surface. In contrast, the Helix BioReactor™ features a
rotating vertical shaft with very low energy lights arranged in a helix or
spiral pattern, which results in a theoretically unlimited number of growth
layers. Additionally, each lighting element is engineered to produce specific
light waves and frequencies for optimal algae growth.
The helix
structure also serves as the bioreactor’s nutrient delivery system, through
which the Quantum Fractured nutrients, including CO2, is evenly delivered to the
entire algae culture, monitored and tuned for optimum growth.
This
algae growth environment will allow the algae culture to replicate exponentially
— doubling the entire colony in as little as a few hours — making for very
efficient, low-cost, low-footprint industrial algae production.
Enabling
a Distributed Oil Model
To reach
the production levels necessary to realistically replace petroleum as an energy
source, an algae oil production system must be fully scalable.
The
OriginOil System is designed to be both modular and scalable. While it can
function as a stand-alone oil producing system, it can also be connected in a
stacked or parallel network to produce a large number of barrels per
day.
OriginOil’s
patent pending system design facilitates large scale algae production through
the horizontal and vertical “stacking” of many Helix BioReactors™ into an
integrated network of fully automated, portable, and remotely monitored growth
units.
Further,
by the use of such modular design, a large number of Helix BioReactors™ can be
connected to a small number of extraction units to achieve both economies of
scale and full industrialization of algae production.
Additionally,
OriginOil systems can be transported and placed anywhere in the world to operate
as fully integrated, round-the-clock oil-producing plants.
By
enabling distributed oil production, we can help decentralize the oil and energy
industry, empowering local energy production in villages, townships,
communities, states and countries. Someday we will no longer need to import
oil.
11
Speeding
Up the Process Further
Algae
growers already know that algae can expand rapidly if space is available. Once
fully matured — and the space is filled — the culture will then stabilize and
grow very little.
If the
space was expanded by a factor of ten, for example, then the algae population
would explode to occupy this new volume - in as little as a day.
This
rapid expansion is called the 'log phase,' or 'logarithmic phase,' of
growth where cells divide exponentially. Typically, growers incubate
an algae population in a smaller vessel and then release it into a larger tank
for production, one batch at a time.
OriginOil's
Helix BioReactor™ growth vessel adds the time-saving efficiency of combining the
incubation vessel and larger tanks into one system. Once the algae matures in
the Helix BioReactor™, a portion of the culture is transferred out for
extraction, and the remaining 'green' water is purified and returned to the
growth tank. It is then allowed to re-expand into the Helix BioReactor™,
creating a new batch, and the process is repeated.
With this
system there is no need to re-incubate each batch: the remaining algae culture
is already mature and is ready to re-enter the log phase after each harvest and
replenishment of growth environment.
The
Cascading Production design makes possible continuous daily harvesting of algae
without incubation, thereby enabling a vital property of industrialized algae
oil production.
Making
the Process Viable
To
overcome the final hurdle, and to make the entire algae-to-oil process viable,
OriginOil devised a method for energy efficient algae oil extraction and does
not use hazardous chemical solvents.
The
process of breaking down algae cells to release oil, known as lysing, has long
represented a challenge — and a final hurdle — for the algae-to-oil industry.
Algae cell walls are difficult to break down. Mechanical methods are
energy-intensive and often ineffective. Commonly used chemical solvents such as
benzene, ether or hexane are toxic and require special handling. Such practices
increase operating costs and make it harder to site algae production
systems.
In
OriginOil's extraction unit, the flowing algae biomass is first sent through a
shielded wave guide system where it receives low-wattage, frequency-tuned
microwave bursts, weakening the cell walls. Then, Quantum Fracturing is
then applied to these pre-cracked cells to complete the oil extraction. Quantum
Fracturing, when used for extraction, creates an ultrasonic effect where the
algae cell breaks down much in the same way that a high-frequency sound wave
breaks glass.
Overcoming
this final hurdle enables low-energy, environmentally-safe and viable,
industrialized algae oil production.
A
Modular Oil Producing System
The
OriginOil System is designed to be modular. It can function as a standalone oil
producing system, or can be connected in a parallel network to produce a large
number of barrels per day output. OriginOil Systems can be placed anywhere to
operate as round-the-clock oil-producing plants.
The
Company will commercialize its technology through an integrated system of global
partners, including:
·
|
Original
Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs)
|
|
·
|
Country
and Regional Partners
|
|
·
|
Device
and Component Manufacturers
|
|
·
|
Service
and Maintenance Providers
|
|
·
|
Customized
Application
Developers
|
A new oil
can be cleanly manufactured in an industrialized process using the OriginOil
System. By enabling distributed oil production we can help transform
the oil and energy industry from a centralized to a distributed model. The
ability to generate clean, carbon-neutral energy anywhere can empower
industrialization in villages, townships, communities, states and countries.
There will be no need to import oil.
12
Enabling
a Distributed Oil Model
The
OriginOil System is designed to be modular. It can function as a standalone oil
producing system, or can be connected in a parallel network to produce a large
number of barrels per day output. OriginOil Systems can be placed anywhere to
operate as round-the-clock oil-producing plants.
By
enabling distributed oil production we can help transform the oil and energy
industry from a centralized to a distributed model. The ability to generate
clean, carbon-neutral energy anywhere can empower industrialization in villages,
townships, communities, states and countries. There will be no need to import
oil. A new oil can be cleanly manufactured in an industrialized
process using the OriginOil System.
Petroleum
Alternatives Are Our Future
Driven by
rising oil prices, Kyoto protocol and global warming concerns, countries
worldwide are quickly embracing petroleum alternatives such as ethanol and
biodiesel, which can curb their dependence on imported oil with minimal
infrastructure change. The market for a new oil is proven and expanding
rapidly.
OriginOil’s
breakthrough technology, based on algae, is targeted at fundamentally changing
the world’s source of oil without disrupting the environment or food resources.
An endless supply of this new oil can be used in many of products like diesel,
gasoline, jet fuel, plastics and solvents without the global warming effects of
petroleum.
Only by
industrializing the manufacture of new oil can the current and future demands of
global industrialization be met.
Benefits
of Algae Oil Production
Cleaner
to Produce and Burn
Petroleum
contains sulfur and other toxins. It is a heavy pollutant. Drilling operations
are highly noxious; crude spills on sea and land are natural catastrophes; and
refineries produce heavy pollutants. By contrast, the algae production process
generates no toxins — it’s a lot like growing grass hydroponically. Oil created
using OriginOil technology generates no heavy metals or sulfur when burned, and
minimal output of greenhouse gases.
Can
Be Produced Close to Point of Demand
Petroleum
often travels tens of thousands of miles to reach its destination. This adds
cost and gives suppliers a stranglehold on consumers. Using OriginOil
technology, fuel can now be produced close to the site of usage and demand —
virtually eliminating the transport cost of petroleum. In the future, portable
OriginOil Systems may be transported to the point of demand and quickly start
producing oil for electricity generation or fuel.
Does
Not Compete with Food
The
ethanol boom is already having a disastrous effect on food prices. Fast-rising
prices of corn have caused havoc in global food supplies and the commodities
markets. Using algae as a feedstock avoids creating shortages in food supplies
or markets.
Works
with Existing Refineries
Unlike
other solutions which bypass the existing refining infrastructure, OriginOil’s
technology enables the production of fully compatible fuels. The petroleum
industry has already announced plans to support the refining of biofuels. Of
these, algae oil is most like petroleum in structure as it can be readily
“cracked” into the lighter components of crude oil such as jet fuel, diesel,
gasoline, solvents and plastics.
Works
With Existing Gas Stations and Vehicles
Most
solutions to the energy problem require massive new infrastructure: hybrids
require new cars with toxic batteries; hydrogen cars need a new fuel network;
and electric cars need their own recharging stations. By contrast, fuel
refined from OriginOil systems can be seamlessly integrated into the current
petroleum distribution system.
A
Complete Solution to Produce a New Oil
Companies
implementing algae oil production systems will need to know that they can
generate product consistently at a competitive price. OriginOil’s complete,
validated industrial process will ensure that these companies can confidently
plan and invest in renewable oil production for the long term.
13
Intellectual
Property
Since our
business is based on licensing of our technology and not manufacturing oil, it
is critical to the Company that it achieves one or more patents. We have filed
the following patent applications with the U.S. Patent and Trademark
Office:
1.
|
On
July 28, 2007, to protect the intellectual property rights for “Algae
Growth System for Oil Production”. The inventors listed on the patent
application are Nicholas Eckelberry and T. Riggs Eckelberry, the Company’s
founders. The Company is listed as the assignee. We have received an
initial determination from the USPTO that this filing is comprised of
multiple inventions.
|
2.
|
On
May 23, 2008, to protect the intellectual property rights for “Apparatus
And Method For Optimizing Photosynthetic Growth In a Photo Bioreactor”.
The inventors listed on the patent application are Steven Shigematsu and
Nicholas Eckelberry. The Company is listed as the assignee. We are still
awaiting examination from the USPTO, with respect to this patent
application.
|
3.
|
On
May 30, 2008, to protect the intellectual property rights for “Modular
Portable Photobioreactor System”. The inventors listed on the patent
application are Steven Shigematsu and Nicholas Eckelberry. The Company is
listed as the assignee. We are still awaiting examination from the USPTO,
with respect to this patent
application.
|
4.
|
On
January 6, 2009, to protect the intellectual property rights for
“Apparatus And Method For Optimizing Photosynthetic Growth In A
Photobioreactor”. The inventor listed on the patent application is
Nicholas Eckelberry. The Company is listed as the assignee. We are still
awaiting examination from the USPTO, with respect to this patent
application.
|
5.
|
On
April 17, 2009, to protect the intellectual property rights for “Device
and Method for Separation, Cell Lysing and Flocculation of Algae From
Water”. The inventor listed on the patent application is Nicholas
Eckelberry. The Company is listed as the assignee. We are still awaiting
examination from the USPTO, with respect to this patent
application.
|
6.
|
On
August 13, 2010, a provisional filing to protect the intellectual property
rights for “Algae Growth Lighting and Control System”. The inventors
listed on the patent application are Scott Fraser, Vikram Pattarkine,
Ralph Anderson and Nicholas Eckelberry. The Company is listed as the
assignee. We are still awaiting examination from the USPTO, with respect
to this patent application.
|
7.
|
On
August 13, 2010, a provisional filing to protect the intellectual property
rights for “Procedure For Extraction Of Lipids From Algae Without Cell
Sacrifice”. The inventors listed on the patent application are Paul Reep
and Michael Green. The Company is listed as the assignee. We are still
awaiting examination from the USPTO, with respect to this patent
application.
|
8.
|
On
September 30, 2009, a provisional filing to protect the intellectual
property rights for “Methods and Apparatus for Growing Algae on a Solid
Surface”. The inventors listed on the patent application are Scott Fraser
and Vikram Pattarkine. The Company is listed as the assignee. We are still
awaiting examination from the USPTO, with respect to this patent
application.
|
9.
|
On
April 28, 2010, a provisional filing to protect the intellectual property
rights for “Multi-plane Growth Apparatus and Method”. The inventor listed
on the patent application is Christopher Beaven. The Company is listed as
the assignee. We are still awaiting examination from the USPTO, with
respect to this patent application.
|
10.
|
On
June 18, 2010, a provisional filing to protect the intellectual property
rights for “Bio Energy Reactor”. The inventor listed on the patent
application is Michael Green. The Company is listed as the assignee. We
are still awaiting examination from the USPTO, with respect to this patent
application.
|
Recent
Developments
Recently,
OriginOil notified MBD Energy Limited (“MBD Energy”) that it is ready to ship a
Quantum Fracturing™ System (QFS), designed to maximize algae CO2 absorption with
minimal energy, to MBD Energy’s research and development facility at James Cook
University in Queensland, Australia. The company’s Single-Step Extraction™
System, designed to efficiently separate algae oil from its biomass, is also
scheduled for delivery under a firm Purchase Order of 1 June 2010. The
shipment of these products will generate our first revenue in the third
quarter.
In May,
2010, we agreed, as part of a multi-phase commercialization program to supply
MBD Energy with its algae-to-oil technology platform in progressively larger
installations. The first research phase is to be supplied on a one-year
lease-to-own basis, with increasing payments to be made quarterly in advance.
(Future phases may be supplied under different payment terms). We have received
as of August 2010, the first quarterly payment of $4,500 on account that was due
within five business days after notifying MBD Energy of the availability of the
QFS product.
Subject
to the success of the initial test phase, MBD Energy will purchase significantly
larger systems to serve its power station projects in Australia, beginning with
a one-hectare pilot plant at Tarong Power Station in South Eastern Queensland,
and expanding to full production sites at all three of MBD Energy’s power
station projects in Australia. According to MBD Energy, each of its power
station projects has the potential to grow to 80-hectare commercial plants, each
capable of producing 11 million liters of oil for plastics and transport fuel,
and 25,000 tons of drought-proof animal feed annually. MBD Energy
estimates that the projects will eventually consume more than half of each power
station’s flue-gas emissions.
14
Critical
Accounting Policies
The
Securities and Exchange Commission ("SEC") defines "critical accounting
policies" as those that require application of management's most difficult,
subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates
about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain and may change in
subsequent periods. Not all of the accounting policies require management to
make difficult, subjective or complex judgments or estimates. However, the
following policies could be deemed to be critical within the SEC
definition.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company will recognize revenue when services are performed, and at the time of
shipment of products, provided that evidence of an arrangement exists, title and
risk of loss have passed to the customer, fees are fixed or determinable, and
collection of the related receivable is reasonably assured. To date, the Company
has had no revenues and is in the development stage.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted
accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the amounts reported in the accompanying financial statements.
Significant estimates made in preparing these financial statements include the
estimate of useful lives of property and equipment, the deferred tax valuation
allowance, and the fair value of stock options. Actual results could differ from
those estimates.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Fair
value of financial Instruments requires disclosure of the fair value
information, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet, where it is
practicable to estimate that value. As of June 30, 2010, the amounts
reported for cash, prepaid expenses, accounts payable, accrued expenses, and
approximate the fair value because of their short maturities
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
Management
reviewed accounting pronouncements issued during the three months ended June 30,
2010, and no pronouncements were adopted during the period.
Results
of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2010 compared to the
three and six months ended June 30, 2009.
Revenues
Currently
the Company is in its development stage and has no revenues.
Operating
Expenses
General and Administrative
Expenses
General
and administrative (“G&A”) expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2010
decreased by $(56,219) to $613,737 compared to $669,956 for the three months
ended June 30, 2009. G&A expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2010,
decreased by $(78,906) to $1,117,045 compared to $1,195,951 for the six months
ended June 30, 2009. The overall decrease for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2010 was due to the net effect of a decrease in the Company’s overall
G&A expenses of $(226,628) and $(295,746) respectively, and an increase in
non-cash stock compensation of $170,409 and $216,840 respectively.
Research and Development
Cost
Research
and development (“R&D”) cost for the three months ended June 30, 2010
increased by $95,390 to $186,085 compared to $90,695 for the three months ended
June 30, 2009. R&D cost for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by
$123,972 to $345,884 compared to $221,912 for the six months ended June 30,
2009. The increase in R&D costs was primarily due to an increase in durable
items and salaries for product development and testing.
Net
Loss
Our Net
Loss for the three months ended June 30, 2010 increased by $(40,771) to
$(815,302) compared to $(774,531) for the three months ended June 30, 2009. Net
Loss for the six months ended June 30, 2010 increased by (44,831) compared to
the six months ended June 30, 2009. The net increase in Net Loss was due
primarily to the increase in non-cash stock compensation expense of $170,409 and
$216,840, respectively, and a decrease in operating expenses of $(129,638) and
$(172,009), respectively.
15
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As of
June 30, 2010, we had $162,226 of working capital as compared to $333,328 at
December 31, 2009. The decrease of $(171,102) in working capital was due
primarily to ongoing costs of developing the company and preparing its
technologies for market.
Net cash
used in operating activities was $(1,324,290) for the six months ended June 30,
2010, compared to $(1,440,092) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
decrease of $(115,802) in net cash used was due to an increase in overall
payables, and a increase in prepaid expenses. The Company also had an increase
in non-cash expense for stock compensation. The Company is in the development
stage and has generated no revenues.
Net cash
used in investing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010 was
$(15,269) compared to $(10,493) for the six months ended June 30, 2009. The
increase of $4,776 of cash used by investing activities was due to patent
expenditures.
Net cash
flows provided from financing activities for the six months ended June 30, 2010
was $1,090,217 compared to $1,251,350 for the six months ended June 30, 2009.
The decrease of $161,133 in net cash flows provided from financing activities
was due to less equity financing.
Our
financial statements as of June 30, 2010 have been prepared under the assumption
that we will continue as a going concern. Our independent registered public
accounting firm has issued their report dated March 31, 2010 that included an
explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt in our ability to continue as
a going concern without additional capital becoming available. Our ability to
continue as a going concern ultimately is dependent on our ability to generate a
profit which is dependent upon our ability to obtain additional equity or debt
financing, attain further operating efficiencies and, ultimately, to
achieve profitable operations. The financial statements do not include any
adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We do not
have any off balance sheet arrangements that are reasonably likely to have a
current or future effect on our financial condition, revenues, and results of
operations, liquidity or capital expenditures.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk.
N/A.
Item 4T. Controls and
Procedures.
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls
and Procedures. Under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our President, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, we evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)
under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation, our President,
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our
disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this
report were effective such that the information required to be disclosed by us
in reports filed under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is (i) recorded,
processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the
SEC's rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management to
allow timely decisions regarding disclosure. A controls system cannot provide
absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met,
and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control
issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been
detected.
Changes in Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. During the most recent quarter ended June 30, 2010,
there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting (as
defined in Rule 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) ) that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
16
PART
II
Item 1. Legal
Proceedings.
We are
not a party to any pending legal proceeding, nor is our property the subject of
a pending legal proceeding, that is not in the ordinary course of business or
otherwise material to the financial condition of our business. None of our
directors, officers or affiliates is involved in a proceeding adverse to our
business or has a material interest adverse to our business.
Item
1A.Risk Factors.
Not
Applicable.
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity
Securities and Use of Proceeds.
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior
Securities.
Not
applicable.
Item 4. Removed and
Reserved
Item 5. Other
Information.
Not
applicable.
Item
6. Exhibits.
Exhibit No.
|
Title
of Document
|
Location
|
||
3.1
|
Articles
of Incorporation
|
(1)
|
||
3.3
|
By-laws
|
(2)
|
||
31.1
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule
13a-14(a) or Rule 15d-14(a) of the Exchange Act.
|
Attached
|
||
32.1
|
|
Certification
by Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, required by Rule
13a-14(b) or Rule 15d-14(b) of the Exchange Act and Section 1350 of
Chapter 63 of Title 18 of the United States Code.
|
|
Attached
|
(1)
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 24,
2008
|
(2)
|
Incorporated by reference to the
Company’s Registration Statement on Form SB-2 filed with the Securities
and Exchange Commission on December 11,
2007.
|
17
SIGNATURES
In
accordance with the requirements of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused this
report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
ORIGINOIL,
INC.
|
|
By:
|
/s/ T Riggs Eckelberry
|
T
Riggs Eckelberry
|
|
Chief
Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer)
|
|
and Acting Chief Financial Officer (Principal Accounting and Financial Officer)
|
|
August
13, 2010
|
18