ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Table of Contents

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

x	QUARTERLY REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15 (d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to .

Commission File Number 001-34292

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Commonwealth of Pennsylvania

23-2530374

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)


77 East King Street, P.O. Box 250, Shippensburg, Pennsylvania		17257
(Address of principal executive offices)		(Zip Code)

(717) 532-6114

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filled by Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. YES x NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter)during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES ¨ NO ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer: and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b – 2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell Corporation (as defined in Rule 12b – 2 of the Exchange Act).

YES ¨ NO x

As of March 31, 2010, 7,943,000 shares of common stock, no par value, of the registrant were outstanding.

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

INDEX


		Page
Part I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (unaudited)
	Condensed consolidated balance sheets - March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009	3
	Condensed consolidated statements of income - Three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	4
	Condensed consolidated statements of changes in shareholders’ equity - Three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	5
	Condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income - Three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	5
	Condensed consolidated statements of cash flows - Three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009	6
	Notes to condensed consolidated financial statements	7 - 18

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	19-24

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk	24

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	24

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	25

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	25

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	25

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	25

Item 4.	(Removed and Reserved)	25

Item 5.	Other Information	25

Item 6.	Exhibits	26

SIGNATURES		27

EXHIBIT INDEX		28

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS


(Dollars in Thousands)	(Unaudited) March 31, 2010			(Audited) * December 31, 2009
ASSETS
Cash and due from banks	$	14,639		$	13,940
Federal funds sold		52,330			8,000

Cash and cash equivalents		66,969			21,940

Short-term investments		6,400			6,388
Interest bearing deposits with banks		644			601
Member stock, at cost which approximates market value		8,056			8,056
Securities available for sale		253,155			196,253

Loans		898,276			881,074
Allowance for loan losses		(12,020	)		(11,067	)

Net Loans		886,256			870,007

Premises and equipment, net		28,939			29,601
Goodwill and intangible assets		20,873			20,938
Cash surrender value of life insurance		21,883			21,204
Accrued interest receivable		4,714			4,605
Other assets		18,149			16,839

Total assets	$	1,316,038		$	1,196,432


LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Deposits:
Non-interest bearing	$	94,918		$	90,676
Interest bearing		902,757			824,494

Total deposits		997,675			915,170

Short-term borrowings		110,213			97,914
Long-term debt		47,484			64,858
Accrued interest payable		999			1,040
Other liabilities		7,685			6,564

Total liabilities		1,164,056			1,085,546


Common stock, no par value—$ .05205 stated value per share; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 7,950,989 and 6,469,508 shares issued		414			337
Additional paid-in capital		120,379			82,895
Retained earnings		30,846			28,857
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)		584			(501	)
Treasury stock, 7,989 and 26,313 shares, at cost		(241	)		(702	)

Total shareholders’ equity		151,982			110,886

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	1,316,038		$	1,196,432

*	Condensed from audited financial statements

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in Thousands)	March 2010		March 2009

INTEREST INCOME
Interest and fees on loans	$	11,839	$	11,415
Interest and dividends on investment securities		1,914		1,142
Interest on short-term investments		30		20

Total interest income		13,783		12,577


INTEREST EXPENSE
Interest on deposits		2,680		3,391
Interest on short-term borrowings		164		85
Interest on long-term debt		442		1,079

Total interest expense		3,286		4,555


Net interest income		10,497		8,022
Provision for loan losses		1,420		215

Net interest income after provision for loan losses		9,077		7,807


OTHER INCOME
Service charges on deposits		1,696		1,511
Other service charges		840		1,047
Trust department income		730		649
Brokerage income		403		285
Other income		406		312
Securities gains		398		165

Total other income		4,473		3,969


OTHER EXPENSES
Salaries and employee benefits		4,832		4,271
Occupancy and equipment		1,203		1,214
Data processing		294		247
Advertising		91		113
Security impairment expense		0		36
Other operating expense		2,366		1,796

Total other expense		8,786		7,677


Income before income taxes		4,764		4,099
Income tax expense		1,358		1,074

Net income	$	3,406	$	3,025


PER SHARE DATA
Basic earnings per share	$	0.52	$	0.47
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.50	$	0.45
Dividends per share	$	0.22	$	0.22

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY (UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(Dollars in thousands)	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)			Treasury Stock			Total Shareholders’ Equity
Beginning Balance, January 1, 2009	$	336	$	82,555	$	21,120		$	1,369		$	(2,033	)	$	103,347

Comprehensive income
Net income		0		0		3,025			0			0			3,025
Net unrealized securities gains		0		0		0			163			0			163
Net unrealized loss on derivatives		0		0		0			(27	)		0			(27	)

Comprehensive income															3,161

Cash dividends ($.22 per share)		0		0		(1,406	)		0			0			(1,406	)

Balance, March 31, 2009	$	336	$	82,555	$	22,739		$	1,505		$	(2,033	)	$	105,102


Beginning Balance, January 1, 2010	$	337	$	82,895	$	28,857		$	(501	)	$	(702	)	$	110,886

Comprehensive income
Net income		0		0		3,406			0			0			3,406
Net unrealized securities gains		0		0		0			681			0			681
Net unrealized gains on derivatives		0		0		0			404			0			404

Comprehensive income															4,491

Cash dividends ($.22 per share)		0		0		(1,417	)		0			0			(1,417	)
Issuance of treasury stock (18,324 shares)		0		11		0			0			461			472
Proceeds from issuance of common stock (1,481,481 shares)		77		37,473		0			0			0			37,550

Balance, March 31, 2010	$	414	$	120,379	$	30,846		$	584		$	(241	)	$	151,982

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND ITS WHOLLY-OWNED SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in Thousands)	March 2010		March 2009

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Net Income	$	3,406	$	3,025

Other comprehensive income, net of tax
Unrealized gain on investment securities available for sale		681		163
Unrealized gain (loss) on rate swaps		404		(27	)

Comprehensive Income	$	4,491	$	3,161

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)


	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in Thousands)	March 2010			March 2009
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income	$	3,406		$	3,025
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		1,098			809
Provision for loan losses		1,420			215
Net (gain) loss on disposal of other real estate owned		(8	)		4
Net (gain) on disposal of bank premises and equipment		(119	)		0
Realized gain on interest rate swap		(28	)		(27	)
Investment securities (gains)		(398	)		(165	)
Securities impairment loss		0			36
Other, net		(399	)		(915	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		4,972			2,982


CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net (increase) in interest bearing deposits with banks and short term investments		(55	)		(327	)
Purchases of available for sale securities		(115,566	)		(45,895	)
Sales and maturities of available for sale securities		59,706			25,201
Proceeds from disposal of other real estate owned		199			204
Proceeds from disposal of bank premises and equipment		373			0
Net (increase) in loans		(17,669	)		(7,614	)
Purchases of bank premises and equipment		(143	)		(116	)
Other, net		(823	)		(1,199	)

Net cash (used) by investing activities		(73,978	)		(29,746	)


CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits		82,505			24,708
Dividends paid		(1,417	)		(1,406	)
Net proceeds from issuance of common stock		37,550			0
Net proceeds from issuance of treasury stock		472			0
Net change in short-term borrowings		12,299			11,906
Repayment of long-term borrowings		(17,374	)		(5,358	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		114,035			29,850


Net increase in cash and cash equivalents		45,029			3,086
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		21,940			26,804

Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	66,969		$	29,890


Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	3,327		$	4,442
Income Taxes		2,000			0

Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
Unrealized gain on investments available for sale (net of deferred taxes of $367 and $99 at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively)		681			163
Unrealized gain (loss) on rate swaps (net of deferred taxes of
$216 and ($15) at March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively)		404			(27	)

Other real estate acquired in settlement of loans		0			163

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed financial statements.

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

March 31, 2010

Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation

The unaudited financial statements of Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (the Corporation) and its subsidiary are presented at and for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 and have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for interim financial information and instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, they do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States for complete financial statements. However, unaudited information reflects all adjustments (consisting solely of normal recurring adjustments) that are, in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim period. Information presented at December 31, 2009 is condensed from audited year-end financial statements. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and footnotes thereto, included in the annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Operating

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. is a financial holding company including its wholly-owned subsidiary, Orrstown Bank. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2010.

Use of Estimates

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change relate to the determination of the allowance for losses on loans and the valuation of real estate acquired in connection with foreclosures or in satisfaction of loans. In connection with the determination of the allowance for losses on loans and foreclosed real estate, management obtains independent appraisals for significant properties.

While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans and foreclosed real estate; future additions to the allowances may be necessary based on changes in local economic conditions. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Corporation’s allowance for losses on loans and foreclosed real estate. Such agencies may require the Corporation to recognize additions to the allowance based on their judgments concerning information available to them at the time of their examination. Because of these factors, management’s estimate of credit losses inherent in the loan portfolio and the related allowance may change in the near term.

Cash Flows

For purposes of the Statements of Cash Flows, cash and cash equivalents include Cash and due from banks and Federal funds sold. The Corporation has elected to present the net increase or decrease in deposits with banks, loans and deposits in the Statement of Cash Flows.

Federal Income Taxes

For financial reporting purposes, the provision for loan losses charged to operating expense is based on management’s judgment, whereas for federal income tax purposes the amount allowable under present tax law is deducted. Additionally, deferred compensation is charged to operating expense in the period the liability is incurred for financial reporting purposes, whereas for federal income tax purposes these expenses are deducted when paid. As a result of the aforementioned timing differences plus the timing differences associated with depreciation expense, deferred income taxes are provided in the financial statements. Income tax expense is less than the amount calculated using the statutory tax rate primarily as a result of tax exempt income earned from state and political subdivision obligations and tax free loans.

Investment Securities

Under generally accepted accounting principles, the Corporation may segregate their investment portfolio into three specific categories: “securities held to maturity”, “trading securities” and “securities available for sale”. Securities held to maturity are to be accounted for at their amortized cost; securities classified as trading securities are to be accounted

for at their current market value with unrealized gains and losses on such securities included in current period earnings; and securities classified as available for sale are to be accounted for at their current market value with unrealized gains and losses on such securities to be excluded from earnings and reported as a net amount in other comprehensive income.

Management determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase. If management has the intent and the Corporation has the ability, at the time of purchase, to hold securities until maturity, they are classified as securities held to maturity and carried at amortized historical cost. Securities to be held for indefinite periods of time and not intended to be held to maturity are classified as available for sale and carried at fair value. Securities held for indefinite periods of time include securities that management intends to use as part of its asset and liability management strategy and that may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, resultant prepayment risk and other factors related to interest rate and resultant prepayment risk changes.

The Corporation has classified all of its investment securities as “available for sale”. Short-term investments consist of certificates of deposits with banks.

Realized gains and losses on dispositions are based on the net proceeds and the adjusted book value of the securities sold, using the specific identification method. Unrealized holding gains and losses, net of tax, on securities available for sale are reported as a net amount in a separate component (“accumulated other comprehensive income”) of shareholders’ equity until realized. Other-than-temporary impairment (OTTI) loss is recognized in earnings through the income statement in the period in which OTTI loss is taken, except for the non-credit component of OTTI losses on debt securities, which are recognized in other comprehensive income. Purchase premiums and discounts are recognized in interest income over the terms of the securities using the interest method over the period to maturity.

The Corporation’s investments are exposed to various risks, such as interest rate, market risk, currency and credit risks. Due to the level of risk associated with certain investments and the level of uncertainty related to changes in the value of investments, it is at least reasonably possible that changes in risks in the near term would materially affect investment assets reported in the financial statements.

Stock-Based Compensation

The Corporation maintains two stock-based compensation plans. These plans provide for the granting of stock options to the Corporation’s directors and the Bank’s employees. Generally accepted accounting principles, “Share-Based Payment” requires financial statement recognition of compensation cost for stock options and other stock-based awards. Both of the Corporation’s stock-based compensation plans are fully vested when granted and, therefore, are expensed on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model.

Earnings per Share of Common Stock

Basic earnings per share represent income available to common stockholders divided by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share reflect the addition of an incremental number of shares added as a result of converting common stock equivalents. A reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding used to calculate basic net income per share and diluted net income per share follows.

Earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, have been computed as follows:


	Three Months Ended
(In Thousands, except per share data)	March 2010		March 2009

Net Income	$	3,406	$	3,025

Weighted average shares outstanding (basic)		6,498		6,386
Impact of common stock equivalents		322		337

Weighted average shares outstanding (diluted)		6,820		6,723


Per share information:
Basic earnings per share	$	0.52	$	0.47
Diluted earnings per share	$	0.50	$	0.45

Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities

Generally accepted accounting principles require that all derivatives be recognized in the Consolidated Financial Statements at their fair values. On the dates that derivative contracts are entered into, the Corporation designates derivatives as (a) hedges of fair values of recognized assets or liabilities or of unrecognized firm commitments (fair-value hedges); (b) hedges

of forecasted transactions or variable cash flows to be received or paid in conjunction with recognized assets or liabilities (cash-flow hedges) or (c) instruments that are held for trading or non-hedging purposes (trading or economic-hedging instruments). For a derivative treated as a fair-value hedge, the effective portion of a change in fair value is recorded as an adjustment to the hedged item. The ineffective portion of the fair-value hedge is recognized in current period earnings. Upon termination of a fair-value hedge of a debt instrument, the resulting gain or loss is amortized to earnings through the maturity date of the debt instrument. For a derivative treated as a cash flow hedge, the ineffective portion of changes in fair value is reported in current period earnings. The effective portion of the cash flow hedge is recorded as an adjustment to the hedged item through other comprehensive income. For a derivative treated as a trading or economic hedging instrument, changes in fair value are reported in current period earnings. Fair values are determined based upon quoted market prices and mathematical models using current and historical data.

The Corporation formally assesses, both at the hedges’ inception, and on an on-going basis, whether derivatives used in hedging transactions have been highly effective in offsetting changes in fair values or cash flows of hedged items and whether those derivatives are expected to remain highly effective in subsequent periods. The Corporation discontinues hedge accounting when (a) it determines that a derivative is no longer effective in offsetting changes in fair value or cash flows of a hedged item; (b) the derivative expires or is sold, terminated or exercised; (c) probability exists that the forecasted transaction will no longer occur or (d) management determines that designating the derivative as a hedging instrument is no longer appropriate. In all cases in which hedge accounting is discontinued and a derivative remains outstanding, the Corporation will carry the derivative at fair value in the Consolidated Financial Statements, recognizing changes in fair value in current period income in the statement of income.

The Corporation follows generally accepted accounting principles, “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities”, which includes the disclosure requirements for derivative instruments and hedging activities to provide enhanced disclosures about (a) how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, (b) how derivative instruments and related hedged items are accounted for and (c) how derivative instruments and related hedged items affect an entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows.

The Bank has entered into three (3) rate swap agreements—two on November 24, 2008, and one on May 22, 2009— related to fixed rate loans. The Bank uses interest rate swaps to reduce interest rate risks and to manage interest income. By entering into these agreements, the Bank converts floating rate assets into fixed rate assets, or alternatively, converts fixed rate assets into floating rate assets. Interest differentials paid or received under the swap agreements are reflected as adjustments to interest income. These interest rate swap agreements are considered cash flow hedge derivative instruments that qualify for hedge accounting. The notional amounts of the interest rate swaps are not exchanged and do not represent exposure to credit loss. In the event of default by a counter party, the risk in these transactions is the cost of replacing the agreements at current market rates.

The effects of derivative instruments on the Financial Statements for March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, are as follows:

Asset Derivatives at dates shown:


(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2010
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments	Notional/ Contract Amount		Estimated Net Fair Value			Estimated Net Fair Value	Expiration Date	Fixed Rate
Interest rate swap - 4 year cash flow	$	30,000	$	496		other assets	11/26/2012	4.97	%
Interest rate swap - 5 year cash flow		20,000		297		other assets	11/26/2013	5.28	%
Interest rate swap - 4 year cash flow		10,000		(26	)	other assets	05/27/2013	4.54	%

	$	60,000	$	767				5.00	%


(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2009
Derivatives designated as hedging instruments	Notional/ Contract Amount		Fair Value Balance Sheet Location			Estimated Net Fair Value	Expiration Date	Fixed Rate
Interest rate swap - 4 year cash flow	$	30,000	$	225		other assets	11/26/2012	4.97	%
Interest rate swap - 5 year cash flow		20,000		39		other assets	11/26/2013	5.28	%
Interest rate swap - 4 year cash flow		10,000		(146	)	other assets	05/27/2013	4.54	%

	$	60,000	$	118				5.00	%

For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009


(Dollars in thousands)
Derivatives in cash flow hedging relationships	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in OCI on Derivatives (Effective Portion)				Location of Gain or (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)	Amount of Gain (Loss) Recognized in Income on Derivative (Ineffective Portion)
	2010		2009			2010		2009
Interest rate swap - 4 year cash flow	$	254	15		Other income	$	17	17
Interest rate swap - 5 year cash flow		246	(57	)	Other income		11	10
Interest rate swap - 4 year cash flow		120	0		Other income		0	0

	$	620	(42	)		$	28	27

Under the terms of the agreement, the Bank pays interest monthly at the rate equivalent to Wall Street Journal prime and receives interest income monthly at the fixed rate shown above.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the accounting for transfers of financial assets. The new guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 166, Accounting for Transfers of Financial Assets, an amendment to SFAS No. 140, was adopted into Codification in December 2009 through the issuance of Accounting Standards Updated (“ASU”) 2009-16. The new standard provides guidance to improve the relevance, representational faithfulness, and comparability of the information that an entity provides in its financial statements about a transfer of financial assets; the effects of a transfer on its financial position, financial performance, and cash flows; and a transferor’s continuing involvement, if any, in transferred financial assets. The Corporation adopted the new guidance in 2010 and has determined it will have no material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued new guidance relating to the variable interest entities. The new guidance, which was issued as SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R), was adopted into Codification in December 2009. The objective of the guidance is to improve financial reporting by enterprises involved with variable interest entities and to provide more relevant and reliable information to users of financial statements. SFAS No. 167 is effective

as of January 1, 2010. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In September 2009, the FASB issued new guidance impacting Topic 820. This creates a practical expedient to measure the fair value of an alternative investment that does not have a readily determinable fair value. This guidance also requires certain additional disclosures. This guidance is effective for interim and annual periods ending after December 15, 2009. The adoption of the new guidance did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In October 2009, the FASB issued ASU 2009-15, Accounting for Own-Share Lending Arrangements in Contemplation of Convertible Debt Issuance or Other Financing. ASU 2009-15 amends Subtopic 470-20 to expand accounting and reporting guidance for own-share lending arrangements issued in contemplation of convertible debt issuance. ASU 2009-15 is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2009 and interim periods within those fiscal years for arrangements outstanding as of the beginning of those fiscal years. The adoption of ASU 2009-15 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-01, Equity (Topic 505): Accounting for Distributions to Shareholders with Components of Stock and Cash – a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force. ASU 2010-01 clarifies that the stock portion of a distribution to shareholders that allows them to elect to receive cash or stock with a potential limitation on the total amount of cash that all shareholders can elect to receive in the aggregate is considered a share issuance that is reflected in EPS prospectively and is not a stock dividend. ASU 2010-01 is effective for interim and annual periods ending on or after December 15, 2009 and should be applied on a retrospective basis. The adoption of ASU 2010-01 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-02, Consolidation (Topic 810): Accounting and Reporting for Decreases in Ownership of a Subsidiary – a Scope Clarification. ASU 2010-02 amends Subtopic 810-10 to address implementation issues related to changes in ownership provisions including clarifying the scope of the decrease in ownership and additional disclosures. ASU 2010-02 is effective beginning in the period that an entity adopts Statement 160. If an entity has previously adopted Statement 160, ASU 2010-02 is effective beginning in the first interim or annual reporting period ending on or after December 15, 2009 and should be applied retrospectively to the first period Statement 160 was adopted. The adoption of ASU 2010-02 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-04, Accounting for Various Topics – Technical Corrections to SEC Paragraphs. ASU 2010-04 makes technical corrections to existing SEC guidance including the following topics: accounting for subsequent investments, termination of an interest rate swap, issuance of financial statements—subsequent events, use of residential method to value acquired assets other than goodwill, adjustments in assets and liabilities for holding gains and losses, and selections of discount rate used for measuring defined benefit obligation. The adoption of ASU 2010-04 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-05, Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Escrowed Share Arrangements and the Presumption of Compensation. ASU 2010-05 updates existing guidance to address the SEC staff’s views on overcoming the presumption that for certain shareholders escrowed share arrangements represent compensation. The adoption of ASU 2010-05 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In January 2010, the FASB issued ASU No. 2010-06, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (Topic 820): Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements. ASU 2010-06 amends Subtopic 820-10 to clarify existing disclosures, require new disclosures, and includes conforming amendments to guidance on employers’ disclosures about postretirement benefit plan assets. ASU 2010-06 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009, except for disclosures about purchases, sales, issuances, and settlements in the roll forward of activity in Level 3 fair value measurements. Those disclosures are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2010 and for interim periods within those fiscal years. The Corporation has adopted ASU 2010-06 with no material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-08, Technical Corrections to Various Topics. ASU 2010-08 clarifies guidance on embedded derivatives and hedging. ASU 2010-08 is effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2009. The adoption of ASU 2010-08 did not have a material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

In February 2010, the FASB issued ASU 2010-09, Subsequent Events (Topic 855): Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements. ASU 2010-09 amends Topic 855 to exclude SEC reporting entities from the requirement to disclose the date on which subsequent events have been evaluated. In addition, it modifies the requirement to disclose the date on which subsequent events have been evaluated in reissued financial statements to apply only to such statements that have been restated to correct an error or to apply U.S. GAAP retrospectively. The amendments are

generally effective immediately, but with respect to the requirement that conduit obligors evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued, the effective date is for interim or annual reporting periods ending after June 15, 2010. The Corporation has adopted ASU 2010-09 with no material impact on the consolidated financial statements.

Note 2: Other Commitments

In the normal course of business, the Bank makes various commitments and incurs certain contingent liabilities which are not reflected in the accompanying financial statements. These commitments include various guarantees and commitments to extend credit. Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The Corporation’s subsidiary bank evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional commitments to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The Bank holds collateral supporting those commitments when deemed necessary by management. As March 31, 2010, $31,584,000 of performance standby letters of credit have been issued. The Corporation does not anticipate any losses as a result of these transactions.

Note 3: Fair Value Measurements

Fair Value Measurements under generally accepted accounting principles defines fair value, describes a framework for measuring fair value, and requires disclosures about fair value measurements by establishing a three-level hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy gives the highest priority to quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). If the inputs used to measure the assets or liabilities fall within different levels of the hierarchy, the classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement of the asset or liability. Classification of assets and liabilities within the hierarchy considers the markets in which the assets and liabilities are traded and the reliability and transparency of the assumptions used to determine fair value.

The three levels are defined as follows: Level 1 – inputs to the valuation methodology are quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets. Level 2 – inputs to the valuation methodology include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active or by model-based techniques in which all significant inputs are observable in the market for the asset or liability, for substantially the full term of the financial instrument. Level 3 – the valuation methodology is derived from model-based techniques in which at least one significant input is unobservable to the fair value measurement and based on the Corporation’s own assumptions about market participants’ assumptions.

Following is a description of the valuation methodologies used for instruments measured on a recurring basis at estimated fair value, as well as the general classification of such instruments pursuant to the valuation hierarchy:

Securities

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities would include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available, securities are classified within level 2 and fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics, or discounted cash flow. Level 2 securities would include U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed agency securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain corporate, asset backed and other securities. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. All of the Corporation’s securities are classified as available for sale.

Interest Rate Swaps

Cash flow interest rate swaps are classified within level 2 with fair values determined by quoted market prices and mathematical models using current and historical data.

The Corporation had no fair value liabilities at March 31, 2010 or December 31, 2009. A summary of assets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, measured at estimated fair value on a recurring basis were as follows:


(Dollars in Thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value Measurements

March 31, 2010
Securities available for sale:
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	0	$	86,115	$	0	$	86,115
Debt securities issued by states and political subdivisions		0		41,763		0		41,763
Government residential mortgage-backed securities		0		123,596		0		123,596

Total debt securities	$	0	$	251,474	$	0	$	251,474
Equity securities		1,416		265		0		1,681

Total securities	$	1,416	$	251,739	$	0	$	253,155
Interest rate swaps		0		767		0		767

Total assets	$	1,416	$	252,506	$	0	$	253,922


December 31, 2009
(Dollars in Thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value Measurements

Securities available for sale:
Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	0	$	119,416	$	0	$	119,416
Debt securities issued by states and political subdivisions		0		37,384		0		37,384
Government residential mortgage-backed securities		0		37,872		0		37,872

Total debt securities	$	0	$	194,672	$	0	$	194,672
Equity securities		1,334		247		0		1,581

Total securities	$	1,334	$	194,919	$	0	$	196,253
Interest rate swaps		0		118		0		118

Total assets	$	1,334	$	195,037	$	0	$	196,371

Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets.

The following describes the valuation techniques used by the Corporation to measure certain financial assets recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in the financial statements:

Loans Held for Sale

Loans held for sale are carried at the lower of cost or fair value. These loans typically consist of one-to-four family residential loans originated for sale in the secondary market. Fair value is based on the price secondary markets are currently offering for similar loans using observable market data which is not materially different than cost due to the short duration between origination and sale (Level 2). As such, the Corporation records any fair value adjustments on a nonrecurring basis. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, loans held for sale were included in total loans on the balance sheet and were recorded at cost, which approximates their fair value.

Impaired Loans

Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans can be based on either the observable market price of the loan or the fair value of the collateral. Fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loan, less estimated costs to sell. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The value of the real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the

Corporation using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction or if an appraisal of the real estate property is older than two years, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business’ financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivables collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans with an allocation to the allowance for loan losses are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the consolidated statement of income. Specific allocations to the allowance for loan losses were $6,197,000 and $4,801,000 at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.

Other Real Estate Owned

Certain assets such as other real estate owned (OREO) are measured at the lower of cost or fair value less cost to sell. There were no OREO write-downs for the quarter ended March 31, 2010.


March 31, 2010
(Dollars in Thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value Measurements

Impaired loans, net	$	0	$	0	$	19,577	$	19,577
OREO		0		873		0		873
Loans held for sale		0		632		0		632


December 31, 2009
(Dollars in Thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value Measurements

Impaired loans, net	$	0	$	0	$	10,702	$	10,702
OREO		0		1,065		0		1,065
Loans held for sale		0		594		0		594

Goodwill and Intangible Assets

Goodwill is valued at the fair value of the assets and liabilities at the time of purchase. Intangible assets are valued based on the purchase price agreed to at the time of purchase.

Fair values of financial instruments

The corporation meets the requirements for disclosure of fair value information about financial instruments, whether or not recognized in the balance sheet. In cases where quoted market prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates using present value or other valuation techniques. Those techniques are significantly affected by the assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of future cash flows. In that regard, the derived fair value estimates cannot be substantiated by comparison to independent markets and, in many cases, could not be realized in immediate settlement of the instruments. Certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments are excluded from disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Corporation.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Corporation in estimating fair values of financial instruments as disclosed herein:

Cash, Due from Banks, Short-Term Investments, Interest Bearing Deposits with Banks and Federal Funds Sold

The carrying amounts of cash, due from banks, short-term investments, interest bearing deposits with banks and federal funds sold approximate their fair value.

Securities Available for Sale

Fair values for investment securities are based on quoted market prices.

Interest Rate Swaps

Fair values for cash flow interest rate swaps are determined by quoted market prices and mathematical models using current and historical data.

Loans Receivable

For variable-rate loans that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values. Fair values for fixed rate loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses, using interest rates currently being offered for loans with similar terms to borrowers of similar credit quality. Fair values for impaired loans are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses or underlying collateral values, where applicable.

Restricted Bank Stock

These investments are carried at cost. The Corporation is required to maintain minimum investment balances in these stocks, which are not actively traded and therefore have no readily determinable market value.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair values disclosed for demand deposits are, by definition, equal to the amount payable on demand at the reporting date (that is, their carrying amounts). The carrying amounts of variable-rate, fixed-term money market accounts and certificates of deposit approximate their fair values at the reporting date. Fair values for fixed-rate certificates of deposits and IRA’s are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation that applies interest rates currently being offered to a schedule of aggregated expected maturities on time deposits.

Short-Term Borrowings

The carrying amounts of federal funds purchased, borrowings under repurchase agreements, and other short-term borrowings maturing within 90 days approximate their fair values. Fair values of other short-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analyses based on the Corporation’s current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Long-Term Borrowings

The fair value of the Corporation’s fixed rate long-term borrowings is estimated using a discounted cash flow analysis based on the Corporation’s current incremental borrowing rate for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The carrying amounts of variable-rate long-term borrowings approximate their fair values at the reporting date.

Accrued Interest

The carrying amounts of accrued interest approximate their fair values.

Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments

The Corporation generally does not charge commitment fees. Fees for standby letters of credit and other off-balance-sheet instruments are not significant.

The estimated fair values of the Corporation’s financial statements were as follows at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:


	March 31, 2010					December 31, 2009
(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Amount			Fair Value		Carrying Amount			Fair Value
Financial Assets

Cash, due from banks, interest bearing deposits with banks and short-term investments	$	21,683		$	21,683	$	20,929		$	20,929
Federal funds sold		52,330			52,330		8,000			8,000
Securities available for sale		253,155			253,155		196,253			196,253
Restricted bank stocks		8,056			8,056		8,056			8,056
Interest rate swaps		767			767		118			118

Loans		898,276					881,074
Allowance for loan losses		(12,020	)				(11,067	)

Net loans		886,256			879,316		870,007			858,975
Accrued interest receivable		4,714			4,714		4,605			4,605

Total financial assets	$	1,226,961		$	1,220,021	$	1,107,968		$	1,096,936


Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$	997,675		$	999,812	$	915,170		$	918,763
Short-term borrowed funds		110,213			110,213		97,914			97,914
Long-term borrowed funds		47,484			47,767		64,858			65,382
Accrued interest payable		999			999		1,040			1,040

Total financial liabilities	$	1,156,371		$	1,158,791	$	1,078,982		$	1,083,099

Note 4: Investments

At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 the investment securities portfolio was comprised of securities classified as “available for sale”, resulting in investment securities being carried at fair value. The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available for sale at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were:


	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2010

Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	86,100	$	368	$	353	$	86,115
Debt securities issued by states and political subdivisions		41,270		786		293		41,763
Government residential mortgage-backed securities		123,641		445		490		123,596
Equity securities		1,865		45		229		1,681

Totals	$	252,876	$	1,644	$	1,365	$	253,155

Short term investments	$	6,400	$	0	$	0	$	6,400

(Dollars in thousands)	December 31, 2009

Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	120,772	$	160	$	1,516	$	119,416
Debt securities issued by states and political subdivisions		36,867		760		243		37,384
Government residential mortgage-backed securities		37,489		637		253		37,873
Equity securities		1,894		2		316		1,580

Totals	$	197,022	$	1,559	$	2,328	$	196,253

Short term investments	$	6,388	$	0	$	0	$	6,388

Investment Security Unrealized Losses:

The following table shows gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:


	Less than 12 Months				12 Months or More				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2010

Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	38,484	$	353	$	0	$	0	$	38,484	$	353
Debt securities issued by states and political subdivisions		10,281		110		453		183		10,734		293
Government residential mortgage-backed securities		92,037		490		0		0		92,037		490

Total debt securities		140,802		953		453		183		141,255		1,136
Equity securities		94		4		826		225		920		229

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	140,896	$	957	$	1,279	$	408	$	142,175	$	1,365


	December 31, 2009

Debt securities issued by the U.S. Treasury and other U.S. government corporations and agencies	$	96,673	$	1,516	$	0	$	0	$	96,673	$	1,516
Debt securities issued by states and political subdivisions		9,889		98		483		145		10,372		243
Government residential mortgage-backed securities		10,913		253		0		0		10,913		253

Total debt securities		117,475		1,867		483		145		117,958		2,012
Equity securities		182		3		979		313		1,161		316

Total temporarily impaired securities	$	117,657	$	1,870	$	1,462	$	458	$	119,119	$	2,328

The previous table represents eighty-six investment securities at March 31, 2010, and ninety-eight investment securities at December 31, 2009 where the current fair value is less than the related amortized cost. Management believes the impairments to be temporary in all cases for both periods disclosed. Consideration is given to the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, and the intent of the Corporation to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value and the likelihood of being required to sell the investments.

At March 31, 2010, the Corporation held one state and political subdivision issue with a fair value less than the related amortized cost for twelve months or more. This is a California issue that is carrying a low market value due to the state’s economic issues. It does not reflect any deterioration of the credit worthiness of the issuing entity. As management intends to hold and it is more likely than not that management will not be required to sell this security for the foreseeable future, the decline is not deemed to be other than temporary. Twenty-eight marketable equity securities have unrealized losses for twelve months or more. Fourteen of these twenty-eight equity securities are financial institution securities; our overall approach to the bank holdings was to consider those trading under their book value as temporarily impaired due to extreme market conditions within the financial sector. We also considered the ability to continue paying dividends as a factor in the long-term worth of these securities. Fourteen of the twenty-eight equity securities are non-financials or industrial securities; we continue to view these companies as valuable long-term holdings in the diversified portfolio. Factors considered were earnings, the ability to pay a dividend, and the outlook for recovery in the industrial sector long-term. Since these companies are considered viable and carry the possibility of price appreciation in the future, impairments are considered temporary.

At December 31, 2009, the Corporation held one state and political subdivision issue with a fair value less than the related amortized cost for twelve months or more. This is a California issue that is carrying a low market value due to the state’s economic issues. It does not reflect any deterioration of the credit worthiness of the issuing entity. As management intends to hold, and it is more likely, than not, that management will not be required to sell this security for the foreseeable future,

the decline is not deemed to be other than temporary. Thirty-three marketable equity securities have unrealized losses for twelve months or more. Twelve of these thirty-three equity securities are financial institution securities; our overall approach to the bank holdings was to consider those trading under their book value as temporarily impaired due to extreme market conditions within the financial sector. We also considered the ability to continue paying dividends as a factor in the long-term worth of these securities. Twenty-one of the thirty-three equity securities are non-financials or industrial securities; we continue to view these companies as valuable long-term holdings in the diversified portfolio. Factors considered were earnings, the ability to pay a dividend, and the outlook for recovery in the industrial sector long-term. Since these companies are considered viable and carry the possibility of price appreciation in the future, impairments are considered temporary. The Corporation recorded $36,000 of equity securities impairment expense during the first quarter of 2009.

The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available for sale and short term investments at March 31, 2010, by contractual maturity are shown below. Contractual maturities will differ from expected maturities because borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

Investment Portfolio


	Available for Sale				Short Term Investments
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value		Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	3,144	$	3,177	$	3,672	$	3,672
Due after one year through five years		29,317		29,574		2,728		2,728
Due after five years through ten years		67,130		67,146		0		0
Due after ten years		27,779		27,981		0		0
Government Backed Residential Mortgage Securities		123,641		123,596		0		0
Equity securities		1,865		1,681		0		0

	$	252,876	$	253,155	$	6,400	$	6,400

Proceeds from sales of securities available for sale for the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, were $51,968,000, and $2,168,000, respectively. Gross gains and losses on sales through March 31, 2010 were $695,000 and $297,000, respectively. Gross gains and losses on sales through March 31, 2009 were $165,000 and $0 respectively.

Securities with a market value of $145,809,000 and $143,984,000 at March 31, 2010, and December 31, 2009, respectively, were pledged to secure public funds and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

Note 5:

Shareholders’ Equity

On February 9, 2010, Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., filed a shelf registration statement on Form S-3 with the Securities and Exchange Commission that provided the Corporation the ability to raise capital from time to time up to an aggregate of $80 million, through the sale of the Corporation’s stock , preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and other securities. During March 2010 the Corporation completed a public offering of 1,481,481 shares of common stock at a price of $27.00 per share for gross proceeds of approximately $40,000,000. Net proceeds of $37,550,000, after deducting underwriting commissions and expenses were received on March 29, 2010.

Note 6:

Subsequent Events

Generally accepted accounting principles, “Subsequent Events” establishes general standards for accounting for and disclosure of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued. The Subsequent Events principle sets forth the period after the balance sheet date during which management of a reporting entity should evaluate events or transactions that may occur for potential recognition in the financial statements, identifies the circumstances under which an entity should recognize events or transactions occurring after the balance sheet date in its financial statements, and the disclosures that should be made about events or transactions that occur after the balance sheet date. In preparing these financial statements, the Corporation evaluated the events and transactions that occurred through the date these financial statements were issued. The Corporation has not identified any events that require recognition or disclosure in the financial statements.

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 2.

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

OVERVIEW

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. (the Corporation) is a financial holding Corporation with a wholly-owned bank subsidiary, Orrstown Bank. The following is a discussion of our consolidated financial condition at March 31, 2010 and results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and three months ended March 31, 2009. Throughout this discussion, the yield on earning assets is stated on a fully taxable-equivalent basis and balances represent average daily balances unless otherwise stated. The discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited) and Notes thereto presented in this report. Certain prior period amounts, presented in this discussion and analysis, have been reclassified to conform to current period classifications.

Certain statements appearing herein which are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Such forward-looking statements refer to a future period or periods, reflecting management’s current views as to likely future developments, and use words like “may,” “will,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate,” or similar terms. Because forward-looking statements involve certain risks, uncertainties and other factors over which the Corporation has no direct control, actual results could differ materially from those contemplated in such statements. These factors include (but are not limited to) the following: general economic conditions, changes in interest rates, changes in the Corporation’s cost of funds, changes in government monetary policy, changes in government regulation and taxation of financial institutions, changes in the rate of inflation, changes in technology, the intensification of competition within the Corporation’s market area, and other similar factors. For a discussion of these forward-looking statements and important factors that could cause results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements contained in this Report, see “Important Factors Relating to Forward Looking Statements” contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Critical Accounting Policies

The Bank policy related to the allowance for loan losses is considered to be a critical accounting policy because the allowance for loan losses represents a particularly sensitive accounting estimate. The amount of the allowance is based on management’s evaluation of the collectability of the loan portfolio, including the nature of the loan portfolio, credit concentrations, trends in historical loss experience, specific impaired loans, and economic conditions.

SUMMARY OF FINANCIAL RESULTS

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. recorded net income of $3,406,000 for the first quarter of 2010 compared to $3,025,000 for the same period in 2009, representing an increase of $381,000 or 12.6%. Basic earnings per share (EPS) increased $0.05 to $0.52 in the recent quarter from the $0.47 earned during the first quarter of 2009. Diluted earnings per share for the first quarter were $0.50 versus $0.45 last year.

Included below are ratios for the return on average tangible assets (ROTA) and return on average tangible equity (ROTE) which exclude intangibles from the balance sheet and related amortization and tax expense from net income due to the associated goodwill and intangibles from the acquisition of companies and purchased deposits.

The following statistics compare the first quarter performance of 2010 to that of 2009:


	Three Months Ended
	March 2010		March 2009
Return on average assets	1.12	%	1.15	%
Return on average tangible assets	1.15	%	1.19	%
Return on average equity	12.18	%	11.84	%
Return on average tangible equity	15.12	%	15.08	%
Average equity / Average assets	9.17	%	9.68	%

Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP-based Financial Measures

Return on average tangible assets and return on average tangible equity are non-GAAP-based financial measures calculated using non-GAAP-based amounts. The most directly comparable GAAP-based measures are return on average assets and return on average equity, which are calculated using GAAP-based amounts. The Corporation calculates the return on average tangible assets and equity by excluding the balance of intangible assets and their related amortization expense from the calculation of return on average assets and equity. Management uses the return on average tangible assets and equity to assess the Company’s core operating results and believes that this is a better measure of our performance. In addition, this is consistent with the treatment by bank regulatory agencies, which excluded goodwill and other intangible assets from the calculation of risk-based capital ratios. However, these non-GAAP financial measures are supplemental and are not a substitute for an analysis based on GAAP measures. A reconciliation of return on average assets and equity to the return on average tangible assets and equity, respectively, is set forth below.


For Quarter Ended:	March 31, 2010		March 31, 2009
Return on Average Assets (GAAP basis)	1.12	%	1.15	%
Effect of excluding average intangible assets and related amortization	0.03	%	0.04	%
Return on Average Tangible Assets	1.15	%	1.19	%
Return on Average Equity (GAAP basis)	12.18	%	11.84	%
Effect of excluding average intangible assets and related amortization	2.94	%	3.24	%
Return on Average Tangible Equity	15.12	%	15.08	%

Tangible book value per share is a non-GAAP-based financial measure calculated using non-GAAP-based amounts. The most directly comparable GAAP-based measure is book value per share of common stock. In order to calculate tangible book value per share, the Corporation’s management divides tangible common equity (a non-GAAP based financial measure calculated by subtracting intangible assets from common equity) by the number of shares of common stock outstanding. In contrast, book value per common share is calculated by dividing total shareholders’ equity by the number of shares of common stock outstanding. Management uses tangible book value per share because it believes such ratio is useful in understanding the Corporation’s capital position and ratios. A reconciliation of book value per share to tangible book value per share is set forth below.


(Dollars in thousands)	March 31, 2010		December 31, 2009
Common shareholder’s equity	$	151,982	$	110,886
Less: intangible assets	$	20,873	$	20,938

Tangible common equity	$	131,109	$	89,948


Book value per share	$	19.13	$	17.21
Less: intangible assets per share	$	2.62	$	3.25

Tangible book value per share	$	16.51	$	13.96

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to Quarter ended March 31, 2009

Net interest income for the first quarter of 2010 was $10,497,000 representing a growth of $2,475,000, or 30.9% over the $8,022,000 realized during the first quarter last year. On a fully taxable equivalent basis (FTE), net interest income for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009 was $10,885,000 and $8,326,000, respectively. Net interest margin increased to 3.76% during the first quarter of 2010, an increase of 36 basis points from the first quarter of 2009, primarily as a result of lower overall cost of funds. Earning asset yields have declined 37 basis points versus first quarter 2009 but cost of funds has declined 73 basis points versus the same period. We have kept liabilities relatively short and taken advantage of the normal yield curve.

The table that follows states rates on a fully taxable equivalent basis (FTE):


	Three Months Ended
	March 2010						March 2009
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balance		Tax Equivalent Interest		Tax Equivalent Rate		Average Balance		Tax Equivalent Interest		Tax Equivalent Rate
Interest Earning Assets:
Federal funds sold & interest bearing bank balances	$	23,711	$	30	0.51	%	$	33,968	$	20	0.24	%
Investment securities		228,899		2,112	3.62	%		123,027		1,294	4.21	%
Total loans		890,065		12,026	5.38	%		820,913		11,567	5.66	%


Total interest-earning assets		1,142,675		14,168	4.92	%		977,908		12,881	5.29	%

Interest Bearing Liabilities:
Interest bearing demand deposits	$	350,336	$	681	0.79	%	$	282,967	$	833	1.19	%
Savings deposits		60,459		44	0.30	%		60,512		64	0.43	%
Time deposits		441,121		1,952	1.78	%		350,625		2,494	2.88	%
Short term borrowings		121,838		164	0.55	%		61,471		85	0.56	%
Long term borrowings		53,296		442	3.32	%		117,861		1,079	3.66	%

Total interest bearing liabilities		1,027,050		3,283	1.28	%		873,436		4,555	2.11	%

Overall cost of funds					1.16	%					1.89	%

Net interest income / net interest spread			$	10,885	3.64	%			$	8,326	3.18	%

Net interest margin					3.76	%					3.40	%

Net Interest Income

FTE net interest income totaled $14,168,000 for the first quarter of 2010 versus $12,881,000 for the same period last year, an increase of $1,287,000. This increase was achieved through a combination of rate and volume factors as our net interest margin has increased by 36 basis points versus first quarter 2009, and interest earning assets have increased by $164,767,000. The net interest margin increased primarily as a result of lower overall cost of funds. While our yields on interest earning assets have declined, we have seen a more rapid decrease in the cost of funds over this time frame. The overall cost of funds declined for the fifteenth consecutive month, to 1.16% for the first quarter of 2010 from 1.89% for the prior year quarter due to the lower interest rate environment, good available sources of funding and decision to maintain a relatively shorter duration position of the balance sheet than in the prior period.

Noninterest Income

Total noninterest income increased $504,000, or 12.7%, from $3,969,000 to $4,473,000. Net security gains during the first quarter 2010 were $398,000 compared to the $165,000 of net gains taken in the first quarter of 2009.

Service charges on deposits increased $185,000, or 12.2%, driven primarily by increases in service charges from the Mastermoney debit card program of $128,000 from the prior year first quarter. Other income had a net increase of $94,000, which included a $119,000 gain on the sale of a piece of real estate. These increases were offset by a decline in service charges on loans of $193,000, or 21.8% due primarily to a decrease in secondary market mortgage program income of $125,000.

Trust and brokerage income has increased approximately $200,000, or 21.4%, due to higher brokerage income. Trust assets under management have increased to $521 million from $336 million at March 31, 2009, due to an increase in the overall value of stocks in general, as well as an increase in the number of accounts under management.

Noninterest Expense

Other expenses rose from $7,677,000 during the first quarter of 2009 to $8,786,000 during the same period of 2010, an increase of $1,109,000, or 14.4%, due primarily to an increase in FDIC insurance expense of $435,000 from the first quarter of 2009. Salary expense increased by $322,000, or 11.3%, versus the prior year. Benefit expense increased by $239,000 over the prior year. Most operating expenses grew commensurate with the overall growth of the Corporation.

The overhead efficiency ratio for Orrstown Financial Services, Inc, is 58.22% for the first three months of 2010. This compares to 2009 peer averages of approximately 65.1% for publicly traded banks of peer size ($1-5 billion), 69.7% for Mid Atlantic banks and 71.8% for all banks, per SNL Financial of Charlottesville, VA. SNL is a provider of information to the banking industry.

INCOME TAX EXPENSE

Income tax expense increased $284,000, or 26.4%, during the first quarter of 2010 versus the first quarter of 2009. The marginal federal income tax bracket is 35% for 2010 and 2009. The 2010 effective tax rate has increased because low income housing tax credits are lower in 2010. In addition, 2009 benefited from a one time historic tax credit project.

Effective income tax rates were as follows:

PROVISION AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The allowance for loan losses is established through a provision for loan losses charged to expense. Loans are charged against the allowance for loan losses when management believes that collectability of the principal is unlikely. The allowance is an amount that management believes will be adequate to absorb possible losses on existing loans that may become uncollectible based on evaluations of the collectability of loans and prior loan loss experience. The evaluations take into consideration factors such as changes in the nature and volume of the loan portfolio, overall portfolio quality, review of specific problem loans, and current economic conditions that may affect the borrowers’ ability to pay. Through this review and evaluation process, an amount deemed adequate to meet current growth and future loss expectations is charged to operations. The unallocated portion of the reserve ensures that any additional unforeseen losses that are not otherwise identifiable will be able to be absorbed. It is intended to provide for imprecise estimates in assessing projected losses, uncertainties in economic conditions and allocating pool reserves. Management deems the total of the allocated and unallocated portions of the allowance for loan losses to be adequate to absorb any losses at this time.

The provision for loan losses amounted to $1,420,000 and $215,000 for the first quarter of 2010 and 2009, respectively. The reserve to loan ratio for the Corporation was 1.34% at March 31, 2010, compared to 0.87% on March 31, 2009. These provisions compared to net charge-offs of $467,000 during the first quarter 2010 and $181,000 during the same period last year. An unallocated amount of $701,000 was included in the March 31, 2010 allowance versus $1,262,000 unallocated at December 31, 2009.

The provision for loan losses and the other changes in the allowance for loan losses are shown below:


	Three Months Ended
(Dollars in Thousands)	March 2010			March 2009
Balance at beginning of period	$	11,067		$	7,140
Provision for loan losses		1,420			215
Recoveries		18			4
Loan charge-offs		(485	)		(185	)

Balance at end of period	$	12,020		$	7,174

NONPERFORMING ASSETS / RISK ELEMENTS

Nonperforming assets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:


(Dollars in Thousands)	March 31, 2010			December 31, 2009
Loans on nonaccrual (cash) basis	$	23,020		$	4,267
Loans whose terms have been renegotiated		0			0

Total nonperforming loans		23,020			4,267
OREO		873			1,065

Total nonperforming assets		23,893			5,332


Loans past due 90 or more days and still accruing		8,929			6,155

Total nonperforming and other risk assets	$	32,822		$	11,487

Ratio of total nonperforming loans to loans		2.56	%		0.48	%
Ratio of total nonperforming assets to assets		1.82	%		0.45	%
Ratio of total risk assets to total loans and OREO		3.65	%		1.30	%
Ratio of total risk assets to total assets		2.49	%		0.96	%

Nonperforming loans totaled $23,020,000, or 2.56% of total loans, at March 31, 2010 compared to $4,267,000, or 0.48% of total loans, at December 31, 2009. Nonperforming loans increased primarily due to the softening of three commercial credits, including the $5.0 million commercial credit disclosed in the December 31, 2009, 10-K, the $8.6 million commercial credit that declared bankruptcy and was disclosed in a March 22, 2010, 8-K filing and a $2.5 million commercial real estate loan that was moved to nonaccrual status during the quarter. The three large commercial credits total $16.1 million and have $3.2 million of specific allocations included in the March 31, 2010 allowance.

Other real estate owned decreased by $192,000 to $873,000, from $1,065,000 at December 31,2009, as a result of the sale of two properties, and no additions to OREO during the first quarter of 2010.

At March 31, 2010, the total recorded investment in impaired loans was $39,598,000, of which $25,774,000 had specific allowances determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles and $13,824,000 did not have specific allowances. The allowance for loan losses on these impaired loans amounted to $6,197,000 at March 31, 2010. The impaired loan total includes the three aforementioned commercial credits that total $16.1 million.

Loans 30 to 89 days past due declined 7.9% from $19.043 million at December 31, 2009, to $17.545 million at March 31, 2010.

CAPITAL

Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. is a financial holding company and, as such, must maintain a well capitalized status in its bank subsidiary. Management foresees no problem in maintaining capital ratios well in excess of regulatory minimums. A comparison of Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.’s capital ratios to regulatory minimum requirements at March 31, 2010 are as follows:


	Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.		Regulatory Minimum		Regulatory Well Capitalized Minimum
Leverage Ratio	10.60	%	4	%	5	%
Risk Based Capital Ratios:
Tier I Capital Ratio	14.15	%	4	%	6	%
Total (Tier I & II) Capital Ratio (core capital plus allowance for loan losses)	15.40	%	8	%	10	%

The Corporation completed a public offering of 1,481,481 shares of common stock at a price of $27.00 per share, for gross proceeds of approximately $40,000,000. Net proceeds after deducting underwriting commissions and expenses are $37,550,000. Additional growth during the first quarter of 2010 is a result of capital growth in the form of retained

earnings. All growth experienced during 2009 has been supported by capital growth in the form of retained earnings. Equity represented 11.6% of assets at March 31, 2010 and 9.3% at December 31, 2009.

Management is not aware of any current recommendations by regulatory authorities which, if implemented, would have a material effect on the Corporation’s liquidity, capital resources or operations.

LIQUIDITY

The primary function of asset/liability management is to assure adequate liquidity while minimizing interest rate risk. Liquidity management involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of customers who may be either depositors wanting to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs. Sources of liquidity include investment securities, loan and lease income and payments, and increases in customer’s deposit accounts. Additionally, Orrstown Bank is a Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) member, and standard credit arrangements available to FHLB members provide increased liquidity. Recognizing the need for varied funding sources, we have established modest relationships using other nontraditional sources, as provided for in our contingency funding plan. We have tested those facilities and are comfortable with our relationships. Liquidity was primarily provided by operating activities and the sale and maturities of available for sale securities.

Item 3.

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk is defined as the exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk, and other relevant market rate or price risks. For domestic banks, the majority of market risk is related to interest rate risk.

Interest rate sensitivity management requires the maintenance of an appropriate balance between interest sensitive assets and liabilities. Interest bearing assets and liabilities that are maturing or repricing should be adequately balanced to avoid fluctuating net interest margins and to enhance consistent growth of net interest income through periods of changing interest rates. The Corporation has consistently followed a strategy of pricing assets and liabilities according to prevailing market rates while largely matching maturities, within the guidelines of sound marketing and competitive practices. Rate sensitivity is measured by monthly gap analysis, quarterly rate shocks, and periodic simulation. The cumulative gap position at 12 months is slightly negative at $65 million at March 31, 2010 and the RSA/RSL cumulative ratio was 0.89%, which was approximately the same as the 0.88% reported at December 31, 2009. The cumulative RSA/RSL at March 31, 2010 is 1.02% at three months. The Corporation enjoys a closely balanced position that does not place it at undue risk under any interest rate scenario. Many of the deposit dollars in transaction accounts are discretionarily priced so management maintains significant pricing flexibility.

Item 4.

Controls and Procedures

(a) Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures:

The Corporation’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have evaluated the effectiveness of the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of March 31, 2010. Based on such evaluation, such officers have concluded that, as of March 31, 2010, the Corporation’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in alerting them on a timely basis to material information relating to the Corporation (including its consolidated subsidiary) required to be included in the Corporation’s periodic filings under the Exchange Act.

(b) Changes in internal controls:

The Corporation regularly assesses the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting and enhances its controls in response to internal control assessments and internal and external audit and regulatory recommendations. There have not been any significant changes in the Corporation’s internal control over financial reporting or in other factors that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, such controls during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

PART II - OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 - Legal Proceedings

The nature of Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.’s business generates a certain amount of litigation involving matters arising out of the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, there are no legal proceedings that might have a material effect on the results of operations, liquidity, or the financial position of the Corporation at this time.

Item 1A - Risk Factors

Except as herein disclosed, there have been no material changes from the risk factors as disclosed in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.

Item 2 - Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The table below summarizes the Corporation’s repurchase of common equity securities during the quarter ended March 31, 2010:


	Total Number of Shares Purchased	Average Price Paid per Share		Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (1)	Maximum Number of Shares that may Yet be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (1)
1/1/10 through 1/31/10	0	$	0	0	52,110
2/1/10 through 2/28/10	0		0	0	52,110
3/1/10 through 3/31/10	0		0	0	52,110

Total	0	$	0	0

(1)

On April 27, 2006, Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. announced a Stock Repurchase Plan approving the purchase of up to 150,000 shares as conditions allow. The plan may be suspended at any time without prior notice and has no prescribed time limit in which to fill the authorized repurchase amount. As of March 31, 2010, 97,890 shares have been purchased under the program.

The Corporation did not sell any unregistered securities during the quarter ended March 31, 2010.

Item 3 - Defaults upon Senior Securities

Not applicable

Item 4 - (Removed and Reserved)

Item 5 - Other Information

None

Item 6 - Exhibits


3.1		Articles of Incorporation, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on January 29, 2010.

3.2		By-laws, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 of the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on January 29, 2010.

4		Instruments defining the rights of security holders including indentures. The rights of the holders of Registrant’s common stock are contained in:

		(i) Articles of Incorporation, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.

		(ii) By-laws, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.

31.1		Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Chief Executive Officer) – filed herewith

31.2		Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications (Chief Financial Officer) – filed herewith

32.1		Section 1350 Certifications (Chief Executive Officer) – filed herewith

32.2		Section 1350 Certifications (Chief Financial Officer) – filed herewith

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

/s/ Thomas R. Quinn, Jr.

(Thomas R. Quinn, Jr., President & CEO)

(Duly Authorized Officer)

/s/ Bradley S. Everly

(Bradley S. Everly, Senior Vice

President & CFO)

(Principal Financial Officer)

Date: May 7, 2010

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

EXHIBIT INDEX


3.1		Articles of Incorporation, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on January 29, 2010.

3.2		By-laws, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on January 29, 2010.

4		Instruments defining the rights of security holders including indentures. The rights of the holders of Registrant’s common stock are contained in:

i.		Articles of Incorporation, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1.

ii.		By-laws, as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2.

31.1		Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Chief Executive Officer) – filed herewith

31.2		Rule 13a - 14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications (Chief Financial Officer) – filed herewith

32.1		Section 1350 Certifications (Chief Executive Officer) – filed herewith

32.2		Section 1350 Certifications (Chief Financial Officer) – filed herewith

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company