ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES INC - Quarter Report: 2019 June (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q


☒			QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2019


☐			TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from to

Commission file number: 001-34292

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

Pennsylvania

23-2530374

(State or Other Jurisdiction of Incorporation or Organization)

(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.)

77 East King Street,

P. O. Box 250

Shippensburg,

Pennsylvania

17257

(Address of Principal Executive Offices)

(Zip Code)

Registrant’s Telephone Number, Including Area Code:

(717)

532-6114

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such files). Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, a smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large accelerated filer

Accelerated filer

☒

Non-accelerated filer

Smaller reporting company

☒

Emerging growth company

☐

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act.). Yes ☐ No x

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of each class

Trading symbol(s)

Name of each exchange on which registered

Common Stock, no par value

ORRF

Nasdaq Capital Market

Number of shares outstanding of the registrant’s Common Stock as of July 30, 2019: 11,221,354.

Table of Contents

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.

INDEX


		Page
Part I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

	Glossary	3

Item 1.	Financial Statements	4

	Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)	4

	Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)	5

	Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)	6

	Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)	7

	Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)	9

	Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)	11

Item 2	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	46

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	64

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	65

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	66

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	66

Item 2.	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	66

Item 3.	Defaults upon Senior Securities	66

Item 4.	Mine Safety Disclosures	66

Item 5.	Other Information	66

Item 6.	Exhibits	67

SIGNATURES			68

Table of Contents

Glossary of Defined Terms

The following terms may be used throughout this Report, including the consolidated financial statements and related notes.


Term			Definition

ALL			Allowance for loan losses
AFS			Available for sale
AOCI			Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
ASC			Accounting Standards Codification
ASU			Accounting Standards Update
Bank			Orrstown Bank, the commercial banking subsidiary of Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.
CDI			Core deposit intangible
CET1			Common Equity Tier 1
CMO			Collateralized mortgage obligation
Company			Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. and subsidiaries (interchangeable with "Orrstown” below)

EPS			Earnings per common share
ERM			Enterprise risk management
Exchange Act			Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
FASB			Financial Accounting Standards Board
FDIC			Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
FHLB			Federal Home Loan Bank
FRB			Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System
GAAP			Accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
GSE			U.S. government-sponsored enterprise
Hamilton			Hamilton Bancorp, Inc., and its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, Hamilton Bank
IRC			Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended
LHFS			Loans held for sale
MBS			Mortgage-backed securities
Mercersburg			Mercersburg Financial Corporation and its wholly-owned banking subsidiary, First Community Bank of Mercersburg (acquired October 1, 2018)
MPF Program			Mortgage Partnership Finance Program
MSR			Mortgage servicing right
NIM			Net interest margin
OCI			Other comprehensive income (loss)

OREO			Other real estate owned (foreclosed real estate)
Orrstown			Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. and subsidiaries
OTTI			Other-than-temporary impairment
Parent Company			Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., the parent company of Orrstown Bank and Wheatland Advisors, Inc.
2011 Plan			2011 Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. Incentive Stock Plan
PCI loans			Purchased credit impaired loans

Repurchase Agreements			Securities sold under agreements to repurchase
ROU			Right of use (leases)
SEC			Securities and Exchange Commission
Securities Act			Securities Act of 1933, as amended
TDR			Troubled debt restructuring
Wheatland			Wheatland Advisors, Inc., the Registered Investment Advisor subsidiary of Orrstown Financial Services, Inc.
Unless the context otherwise requires, the terms “Orrstown,” “we,” “us,” “our,” and “Company” refer to Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. and its subsidiaries.

Table of Contents

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1. Financial Statements

Consolidated Balance Sheets (Unaudited)

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	35,468	$	26,156
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	72,670		45,664
Federal funds sold	8,741		16,995
Cash and cash equivalents	116,879		88,815
Restricted investments in bank stocks	10,105		10,842
Securities available for sale	496,930		465,844
Loans held for sale	7,152		3,340
Loans	1,601,670		1,247,657
Less: Allowance for loan losses	(14,460)		(14,014)
Net loans	1,587,210		1,233,643
Premises and equipment, net	41,508		38,201
Cash surrender value of life insurance	59,551		41,327
Goodwill	19,621		12,592
Other intangible assets, net	8,140		3,910
Accrued interest receivable	6,558		5,927
Other assets	45,854		29,947
Total assets	$	2,399,508	$	1,934,388
Liabilities
Deposits:
Noninterest-bearing	$	247,205	$	204,843
Interest-bearing	1,768,336		1,353,913
Total deposits	2,015,541		1,558,756
Short-term borrowings	9,373		64,069
Long-term debt	83,261		83,450
Subordinated notes	31,821		31,859
Accrued interest and other liabilities	39,644		22,821
Total liabilities	2,179,640		1,760,955
Shareholders’ Equity
Preferred stock, $1.25 par value per share; 500,000 shares authorized; no shares issued or outstanding	0		0
Common stock, no par value—$0.05205 stated value per share 50,000,000 shares authorized; 11,223,993 and 9,439,255 shares issued; 11,223,993 and 9,430,224 shares outstanding	584		491
Additional paid - in capital	188,414		151,678
Retained earnings	27,462		24,472
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)	3,408		(2,972)
Treasury stock—common, 0 and 9,031 shares, at cost	0		(236)
Total shareholders’ equity	219,868		173,433
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	2,399,508	$	1,934,388

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Income (Unaudited)

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018		June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018
Interest income
Loans	$	19,553	$	11,731	$	34,612	$	22,787
Investment securities - taxable	3,679		2,539		7,171		4,832
Investment securities - tax-exempt	632		1,008		1,474		1,879
Short-term investments	503		46		676		101
Total interest income	24,367		15,324		43,933		29,599
Interest expense
Deposits	4,870		2,161		8,564		3,985
Short-term borrowings	34		402		277		765
Long-term debt	532		408		975		812
Subordinated notes	499		0		996		0
Total interest expense	5,935		2,971		10,812		5,562
Net interest income	18,432		12,353		33,121		24,037
Provision for loan losses	200		200		600		400
Net interest income after provision for loan losses	18,232		12,153		32,521		23,637
Noninterest income
Service charges on deposit accounts	1,680		1,463		3,169		2,881
Other service charges, commissions and fees	346		689		587		938
Trust and investment management income	1,749		1,701		3,507		3,369
Brokerage income	672		501		1,150		1,059
Mortgage banking activities	652		679		1,120		1,314
Income from life insurance	684		291		1,026		568
Other income	32		135		144		216
Investment securities gains	2,064		46		2,403		862
Total noninterest income	7,879		5,505		13,106		11,207
Noninterest expenses
Salaries and employee benefits	8,922		7,855		17,599		15,877
Occupancy	1,066		679		2,067		1,477
Furniture and equipment	1,140		1,068		2,163		1,987
Data processing	1,058		595		1,828		1,214
Telephone and communication	202		165		414		361
Automated teller and interchange fees	238		190		474		361
Advertising and bank promotions	548		237		1,069		619
FDIC insurance	221		172		406		338
Legal fees	120		83		173		149
Other professional services	587		476		1,091		779
Directors' compensation	261		205		497		456

Real estate owned	12		53		14		78
Taxes other than income	314		251		620		502
Intangible asset amortization	402		24		610		48

Merger related	6,860		154		7,505		154
Insurance claim receivable write off	0		0		615		0
Other operating expenses	1,363		1,065		2,351		1,941
Total noninterest expenses	23,314		13,272		39,496		26,341
Income before income tax expense	2,797		4,386		6,131		8,503
Income tax expense	110		374		342		866
Net income	$	2,687	$	4,012	$	5,789	$	7,637
Per share information:
Basic earnings per share	$	0.26	$	0.50	$	0.59	$	0.94
Diluted earnings per share	0.26		0.48		0.58		0.92

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Unaudited)

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018		June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018
Net income	$	2,687	$	4,012	$	5,789	$	7,637
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax:
Unrealized gains (losses) on securities available for sale arising during the period	5,353		(530)		10,480		(6,149)
Reclassification adjustment for gains realized in net income	(2,064)		(46)		(2,403)		(862)
Net unrealized gains (losses)	3,289		(576)		8,077		(7,011)
Tax effect	(691)		121		(1,697)		1,473
Total other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax and reclassification adjustments	2,598		(455)		6,380		(5,538)
Total comprehensive income	$	5,285	$	3,557	$	12,169	$	2,099

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity (Unaudited)

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Treasury Stock		Total Shareholders’ Equity






















Balance, March 31, 2018	438		125,988		18,667		(2,238)		(299)		142,556
Net income	0		0		4,012		0		0		4,012

Total other comprehensive loss, net of taxes	0		0		0		(455)		0		(455)
Cash dividends ($0.13 per share)	0		0		(1,095)		0		0		(1,095)

Share-based compensation plans:
300 net common shares forfeited and 11,317 net treasury shares acquired, including compensation expense of $444	0		414		0		0		(295)		119

Balance, June 30, 2018	438		126,402		21,584		(2,693)		(594)		145,137




















	Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Treasury Stock		Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, January 1, 2018	$	435	$	125,458	$	16,042	$	2,845	$	(15)	$	144,765
Net income	0		0		7,637		0		0		7,637

Total other comprehensive loss, net of taxes	0		0		0		(5,538)		0		(5,538)
Cash dividends ($0.25 per share)	0		0		(2,095)		0		0		(2,095)

Share-based compensation plans:
75,623 net common shares issued and 21,965 net treasury shares acquired, including compensation expense of $924	3		944		0		0		(579)		368

Balance, June 30, 2018	$	438	$	126,402	$	21,584	$	(2,693)	$	(594)	$	145,137

Table of Contents



	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Treasury Stock		Total Shareholders’ Equity









Balance, March 31, 2019	494		151,702		26,161		810		0		179,167
Net income	0		0		2,687		0		0		2,687

Total other comprehensive loss, net of taxes	0		0		0		2,598		0		2,598
Cash dividends ($0.15 per share)	0		0		(1,386)		0		0		(1,386)
Issuance of stock (1,765,704 common shares) to acquire Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.	92		36,530		0		0		0		36,622
Share-based compensation plans:
26,480 net common shares forfeited, including compensation expense of $180	(2)		182		0		0		0		180

Balance, June 30, 2019	584		188,414		27,462		3,408		0		219,868




















	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
(Dollars in thousands, except per share information)	Common Stock		Additional Paid-In Capital		Retained Earnings		Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)		Treasury Stock		Total Shareholders’ Equity
Balance, January 1, 2019	$	491	$	151,678	$	24,472	$	(2,972)	$	(236)	$	173,433
Net income	0		0		5,789		0		0		5,789

Total other comprehensive loss, net of taxes	0		0		0		6,380		0		6,380
Cash dividends ($0.30 per share)	0		0		(2,799)		0		0		(2,799)
Issuance of stock (1,765,704 common shares) to acquire Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.	92		36,530		0		0		0		36,622
Share-based compensation plans:
19,034 net common shares issued and 9,031 net treasury shares issued, including compensation expense of $679	1		206		0		0		236		443

Balance, June 30, 2019	$	584	$	188,414	$	27,462	$	3,408	$	0	$	219,868

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)

ORRSTOWN FINANCIAL SERVICES, INC.


	Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018
Cash flows from operating activities
Net income	$	5,789	$	7,637
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Net premium amortization	2,203		947
Depreciation and amortization (including amortization of ROU assets)	2,366		1,721
Provision for loan losses	600		400
Share-based compensation	679		924
Gain on sales of loans originated for sale	(909)		(1,066)
Mortgage loans originated for sale	(43,471)		(45,050)
Proceeds from sales of loans originated for sale	40,392		46,485

Net gain on disposal of OREO	(8)		(106)
Writedown of OREO	0		13
Net (gain) loss on disposal of premises and equipment	607		(6)
Deferred income taxes	263		518
Investment securities gains	(2,403)		(862)
Income from life insurance	(1,026)		(568)
(Increase) decrease in accrued interest receivable	730		(520)
Increase in accrued interest payable and other liabilities	(1,147)		5,218
Other, net	1,100		(1,739)
Net cash provided by operating activities	5,765		13,946
Cash flows from investing activities
Proceeds from sales of AFS securities	174,335		88,110
Maturities, repayments and calls of AFS securities	15,297		7,059
Purchases of AFS securities	(150,386)		(132,373)
Net cash and cash equivalents received from acquisitions	29,442		0
Net (purchases) redemptions of restricted investments in bank stocks	3,395		(2,700)
Net increase in loans	(8,395)		(54,132)


Purchases of bank premises and equipment	(1,489)		(1,053)

Proceeds from disposal of OREO	374		1,028
Proceeds from disposal of bank premises and equipment	0		7
Purchases of bank owned life insurance	0		(900)
Proceeds from settlement of life insurance contracts	571		0

Net cash used in investing activities	63,144		(94,954)
Cash flows from financing activities
Net increase in deposits	68,525		106,351
Net increase (decrease) in borrowings with original maturities less than 90 days	(29,696)		10,263

Payments on other short-term borrowings	(25,000)		(40,000)
Proceeds from long-term debt	20,000		0
Payments on long-term debt	(71,582)		(180)

Subordinated note issuance costs	(57)		0

Dividends paid	(2,799)		(2,095)


Treasury shares repurchased for employee taxes associated with restricted stock vesting	(294)		(651)
Proceeds from issuance of stock for option exercises and employee stock purchase plan	58		95

Net cash provided by financing activities	(40,845)		73,783
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents	28,064		(7,225)
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period	88,815		29,807
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period	$	116,879	$	22,582

Table of Contents


Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
Cash paid during the period for:
Interest	$	10,326	$	5,562
Income taxes	0		60
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing activities:
OREO acquired in settlement of loans	161		408

ROU assets obtained in exchange for lease obligations	8,115		0
Security purchases not yet settled	0		4,002

The Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements are an integral part of these statements.

Table of Contents

Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)

NOTE 1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

See the Glossary of Defined Terms at the beginning of this Report for terms used throughout the consolidated financial statements and related notes of this Form 10-Q.

Nature of Operations – Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. and subsidiaries is a financial holding company that operates Orrstown Bank, a commercial bank with banking and financial advisory offices in Berks, Cumberland, Dauphin, Franklin, Lancaster, Perry and York Counties, Pennsylvania, and in Anne Arundel, Baltimore, Howard and Washington Counties, Maryland, as well as Baltimore City, Maryland and Wheatland Advisors, Inc., a registered investment advisor non-bank subsidiary, headquartered in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania. The Company operates in the community banking segment and engages in lending activities, including commercial, residential, commercial mortgages, construction, municipal, and various forms of consumer lending, and deposit services, including checking, savings, time, and money market deposits. The Company also provides fiduciary services, investment advisory, insurance and brokerage services. The Company and the Bank are subject to regulation by certain federal and state agencies and undergo periodic examinations by such regulatory authorities.

Basis of Presentation – The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiaries, the Bank and Wheatland. The Company has prepared these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements in accordance with GAAP for interim financial information, SEC rules that permit reduced disclosure for interim periods, and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (all of which are of a normal recurring nature) that are necessary for a fair statement are reflected in the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements. The December 31, 2018 consolidated balance sheet information contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q was derived from the 2018 audited consolidated financial statements. Interim results are not necessarily indicative of results for a full year. The unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements, including the notes thereto, included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2019. All significant intercompany transactions and accounts have been eliminated. Certain reclassifications may have been made to prior year amounts to conform with current year classifications.

The Company's management has evaluated all activity of the Company and concluded that subsequent events are properly reflected in the Company's consolidated financial statements and notes as required by GAAP.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. Material estimates that are particularly susceptible to significant change include the determination of the ALL and those used in valuation methodologies in areas with no observable market, such as loans, deposits, borrowings, goodwill, core deposit and other intangible assets, other assets and liabilities obtained or assumed in business combinations.

Leases - We evaluate our contracts at inception to determine if an arrangement is or contains a lease. Operating leases are included in operating lease ROU assets in Other assets and operating lease liabilities in Accrued interest payable and other liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. The Company has no finance leases.

ROU assets represent our right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent our obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. Operating lease ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of lease payments over the lease term. Our leases do not provide an implicit rate, so we use our incremental borrowing rate, which approximates our fully collateralized borrowing rate, based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. The incremental borrowing rate is reevaluated upon lease modification. The operating lease ROU asset also includes any initial direct costs and prepaid lease payments made less any lease incentives. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise that option.

We adopted ASU 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842),” on January 1, 2019, the effective date of the guidance, using the practical expedient transition method whereby we did not revise comparative period information or disclosure. The new standard requires lessees to record assets and liabilities on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months. We elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which among other things, allows us to carryforward the historical lease classification. We also elected certain optional practical expedients,

Table of Contents

including the hindsight practical expedient under which we considered the actual outcomes of lease renewals and terminations when measuring the lease term at adoption, and we made an accounting policy election to keep leases with an initial term of 12 months or less off of the balance sheet. We recognize these lease payments in the consolidated statements of income on a straight-line basis over the lease term. We have lease agreements with lease and non-lease components, and we have elected the practical expedient to account for these as a single lease component.

Our operating leases relate primarily to bank branches and office space. In conjunction with the adoption on January 1, 2019, we recognized operating lease liabilities of $7,971,000 and related lease assets of $7,494,000 on our balance sheet. The difference between the lease assets and lease liabilities primarily consists of deferred rent liabilities reclassified upon adoption to reduce the measurement of the lease assets. The standard did not materially impact our consolidated net income and had no impact on cash flows.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - ASU No. 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments. The amendments in this update require a financial asset (or a group of financial assets) measured at amortized cost basis to be presented at the net amount expected to be collected. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from the amortized cost basis of the financial assets to present the net carrying value at the amount expected to be collected on the financial assets. Under the updates, the income statement will reflect the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. The measurement of expected credit losses is based on relevant information about past events, including historical experience, current conditions, and reasonable and supportable forecasts that affect the collectibility of the reported amount of financial assets. An entity must use judgment in determining the relevant information and estimation methods that are appropriate in its circumstances. The allowance for credit losses for purchased financial assets with a more-than-insignificant amount of credit deterioration since origination that are measured at amortized cost basis is determined in a similar manner to other financial assets measured at amortized cost basis; however, the initial allowance for credit losses is added to the purchase price rather than being reported as a credit loss expense. Only subsequent changes in the allowance for credit losses are recorded as a credit loss expense for these assets. Off-balance-sheet arrangements such as commitments to extend credit, guarantees, and standby letters of credit that are not considered derivatives under ASC 815 and are not unconditionally cancellable are also within the scope of this update. Credit losses relating to available for sale debt securities should be recorded through an allowance for credit losses. An entity will apply the amendments in this update on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is effective. In that regard, the Company has formed a cross-functional working group, under the direction of the Chief Financial Officer and the Chief Risk Officer. The working group is comprised of individuals from various functional areas including credit, risk management, finance and information technology. Our implementation plan includes, but is not not limited to, an assessment of processes, portfolio segmentation, model development, system requirements and the identification of data and resource needs. We are currently evaluating various loss estimation models. We are also working with a third party vendor solution to assist with the application of ASU 2016-13 and anticipate running parallel models in 2019. While we currently cannot reasonably estimate the impact of adopting this standard, we expect the impact will be influenced by the composition, characteristics and quality of our loan and securities portfolios, as well as the general economic conditions and forecasts at the adoption date. For public companies, the update is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. On July 17, 2019, the FASB voted to propose to delay the effective date of this ASU for smaller reporting companies until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, with earlier adoption permitted, although the full proposal has not yet been released. The Company currently meets the requirements to be considered a smaller reporting company under SEC Regulation S-K and SEC Rule 405, and is evaluating the impact of the roposed delay for adoption of the update.

ASU 2017-04, Intangibles - Goodwill and Other (Topic 350): Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. The update simplifies how all entities assess goodwill for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. As amended, the goodwill impairment test will consist of one step comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize a goodwill impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value. ASU 2017-04 will be effective for the Company on January 1, 2020, with earlier adoption permitted, and is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's consolidated financial statements.

ASU 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20). The update shortens the amortization period of certain callable debt securities held at a premium to the earliest call date unless applicable guidance related to certain pools of securities is applied to consider estimated prepayments. Under prior guidance, entities were generally required to amortize premiums on individual, non-pooled callable debt securities as a yield adjustment over the contractual life of the security. ASU 2017-08 does not change the accounting for callable debt securities held at a discount. On January 1, 2019, we adopted ASU 2016-18 with no material impact on our consolidated financial condition or results of operations.

Table of Contents

In August 2018, the SEC adopted the final rule under SEC Release No. 33-10532, Disclosure Update and Simplification, amending certain disclosure requirements. In addition, the amendments expanded the disclosure requirements on the analysis of stockholders' equity for interim financial statements. Under the amendments, an analysis of changes in each caption of stockholders' equity presented in the balance sheet must be provided in a note or separate statement and should present a reconciliation of the beginning balance to the ending balance for each period for which a statement of comprehensive income is presented. The Company implemented the additional disclosure requirements effective with the filing of its March 31, 2019 Form 10-Q.

NOTE 2. MERGERS AND ACQUISITIONS

Mercersburg Financial Corporation

On October 1, 2018, we acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Mercersburg Financial Corporation and its wholly-owned subsidiary, First Community Bank of Mercersburg, headquartered in Mercersburg, Pennsylvania. We issued 1,052,635 shares of our common stock and paid $4,866,000 in cash for all outstanding shares of Mercersburg stock. Based on our $23.80 closing stock price on Friday, September 28, 2018, the consideration paid to acquire Mercersburg totaled $29,919,000.

The fair value of assets acquired, excluding goodwill, totaled $181,430,000, including loans totaling $141,103,000 and investment securities available for sale totaling $7,352,000. The fair value of liabilities assumed totaled $163,384,000, including deposits totaling $160,433,000. The Company recognized $11,873,000 in initial goodwill, representing consideration transferred in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired in the Mercersburg acquisition. The goodwill resulting from the acquisition represents the value expected from the expansion of our market in south central Pennsylvania and the enhancement of our operations through customer synergies and efficiencies, thereby providing enhanced customer service.

The Mercersburg acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, purchased assets, including identifiable intangible assets, and assumed liabilities were recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values. The fair value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information relative to closing date fair values become available. The Company continues to finalize the fair values of loans and, as a result, the fair value adjustment is preliminary and may change as information becomes available. No material measurement period adjustments were made in the six months ended June 30, 2019. The results of operations for the Company include Mercersburg's results from and after October 1, 2018.

Hamilton Bancorp, Inc.

On May 1, 2019, we acquired 100% of the outstanding common shares of Hamilton Bancorp, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiary, Hamilton Bank, based in Towson, Maryland. We acquired Hamilton to introduce our banking and financial services into the Greater Baltimore area of Maryland.

Pursuant to the merger agreement, we issued 1,765,704 shares of our common stock and paid $14,197,000 in cash for all outstanding shares of Hamilton stock and options vesting upon acquisition. Based on our closing stock price of $20.74 on Tuesday, April 30, 2019, the consideration paid to acquire Hamilton totaled approximately $50,819,000.

The fair value of assets acquired, excluding goodwill, totaled $493,194,000, including loans totaling $347,667,000. The fair value of liabilities assumed totaled $449,405,000, including deposits totaling $388,246,000. Goodwill represents consideration transferred in excess of the fair value of the net assets acquired. At May 1, 2019, the Company recognized $7,030,000 in initial goodwill associated with the Hamilton acquisition. The goodwill resulting from the acquisition represents the value expected from the expansion of our market in the Greater Baltimore area and the enhancement of our operations through customer synergies and efficiencies, thereby providing enhanced customer service. Goodwill acquired in the Hamilton acquisition is not deductible for tax purposes.

The Hamilton acquisition was accounted for using the acquisition method of accounting and, accordingly, purchased assets, including identifiable intangible assets, and assumed liabilities were recorded at their respective acquisition date fair values. The fair value measurements of assets acquired and liabilities assumed are subject to refinement for up to one year after the closing date of the acquisition as additional information relative to closing date fair values become available. The Company continues to finalize the fair values of loans, intangible assets, other assets, income taxes and liabilities. As a result, the fair value adjustments are preliminary and may change as information becomes available. Fair value adjustments will be finalized no later than May 2020. The results of operations for the Company include Hamilton's results from and after May 1, 2019.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the consideration paid for Hamilton and the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities assumed recognized at the acquisition date:


(Dollars in thousands)
Fair value of consideration transferred:
Cash	$	14,197
Common stock issued	36,622
Total consideration transferred	$	50,819

Estimated fair values of assets acquired and (liabilities) assumed:
Cash and cash equivalents	$	43,140
Securities available for sale	60,882
Restricted investments in bank stocks	2,658
Loans	347,667
Premises and equipment	3,749
Core deposit intangible	4,550
Goodwill	7,030
Cash surrender value of life insurance	17,948
Deferred tax asset, net	5,838
ROU lease asset	2,746
Other assets	4,016
Total assets acquired	500,224

Deposits	(388,246)
Borrowings	(51,393)
Other liabilities	(9,766)
Total liabilities assumed	(449,405)
	$	50,819

The determination of estimated fair values of the acquired loans required the Company to make certain estimates about discount rates, future expected cash flows, market conditions and other future events that are highly subjective in nature. Based on such factors as past due status, nonaccrual status, bankruptcy status, and credit risk ratings, the acquired loans were divided into loans with evidence of credit quality deterioration, which are accounted for under ASC 310-30 (purchased credit impaired), and loans that do not meet this criteria, which are accounted for under ASC 310-20 (purchased non-impaired). Expected cash flows, both principal and interest, were estimated based on key assumptions covering such factors as prepayments, default rates and severity of loss given default. These assumptions were developed using both Hamilton's historical experience and the portfolio characteristics as of the acquisition date as well as available market research. The fair value estimates for acquired loans were based on the amount and timing of expected principal, interest and other cash flows, including expected prepayments, discounted at prevailing market interest rates applicable to the types of acquired loans, which we considered to be level 3 fair value measurements. Deposit liabilities assumed in the Hamilton acquisition were segregated into two categories: time-deposits (i.e., deposit accounts with a stated maturity) and demand deposits, both using level 2 fair value measurements. In determining fair value of time deposits, the Company discounted the contractual cash flows of the deposit accounts using prevailing market interest rates for time deposit accounts of similar type and duration. For demand deposits, the acquisition date outstanding balance of the assumed demand deposit accounts approximates fair value. Acquisition date fair values for securities available for sale were determined using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs consistent with the methods discussed further in “Note 12 - Fair Value.” The remaining acquisition date fair values represent either Level 2 fair value measurements or Level 3 fair value measurements (premises and equipment and core deposit intangible).

Table of Contents

We recognized a core deposit intangible of $4,550,000, which will be amortized using an accelerated method over a 10-year amortization period, consistent with expected future cash flows.

Loans acquired with Hamilton were measured at fair value at the acquisition date with no carryover of any ALL. Loans were segregated into those loans considered to be performing and those considered PCI. The following table presents performing and PCI loans acquired, by loan class, at May 1, 2019.

Upon completion of the acquisition, the Company sold the acquired investment portfolio and paid off acquired borrowings at the indicated fair value amounts in conjunction with its asset/liability management strategies.


(in thousands)	Performing		PCI		Total
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	42,148	$	6,324	$	48,472
Non-owner occupied	45,401		770		46,171
Multi-family	10,773		0		10,773

Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	7,450		0		7,450
Commercial and land development	4,528		0		4,528
Commercial and industrial	32,316		1,702		34,018

Residential mortgage:
First lien	152,657		10,800		163,457
Home-equity - term	4,478		1		4,479
Home equity - lines of credit	13,657		0		13,657
Installment and other loans	14,467		195		14,662
Total loans acquired	$	327,875	$	19,792	$	347,667

The following table presents the fair value adjustments made to the amortized cost basis of loans acquired at May 1, 2019.


(in thousands)
Gross amortized cost basis at acquisition	$	362,125
Market rate adjustment	(5,309)
Credit fair value adjustment on non-credit impaired loans	(3,947)
Credit fair value adjustment on impaired loans	(5,202)
Estimated fair value of acquired loans	$	347,667

The market rate adjustment represents the movement in market interest rates, irrespective of credit adjustments, compared to the contractual rates of the acquired loans. The credit adjustment made on non-PCI loans represents the changes in credit quality of the underlying borrowers from loan inception to the acquisition date. The credit adjustment on PCI loans is derived in accordance with ASC 310-30 and represents the portion of the loan balance that has been deemed uncollectible based on our expectations of future cash flows for each respective loan.

Table of Contents

The following table provides information about acquired PCI loans at May 1, 2019.


(in thousands)
Contractually required principal and interest at acquisition	$	31,599
Nonaccretable difference	(8,310)
Expected cash flows at acquisition	23,289
Accretable yield	(3,497)
Estimated fair value of acquired PCI loans	$	19,792

Unaudited pro forma net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, would have totaled $3,557,000 and $2,516,000, and revenues would have totaled $34,878,000 and $58,695,000 for the same period had the Mercersburg and Hamilton acquisitions occurred January 1, 2018. Unaudited pro forma net income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, would have totaled $6,152,000 and $9,710,000, and revenues would have totaled $27,607,000 and $50,923,000 for the same period had the Hamilton acquisition occurred January 1, 2019.

In connection with the Mercersburg and Hamilton acquisitions, we incurred merger related expenses totaling $6,860,000 and $7,505,000 for the three and six months ending June 30, 2019, which are included in noninterest expenses. The expenses consisted primarily of $1,649,000 and $1,967,000 of investment banking, legal and consulting fees; $3,492,000 and $3,619,000 of information systems expense, including canceling of contracts; and $1,719,000 and $1,919,000 of other expenses, including payout of employee termination contracts.

NOTE 3. SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, all investment securities were classified as AFS. The following table summarizes amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities, and the corresponding amounts of gross unrealized gains and losses recognized in AOCI, at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Gross Unrealized Gains		Gross Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
June 30, 2019


States and political subdivisions	$	96,080	$	6,030	$	0	$	102,110

GSE residential CMOs	72,269		1,055		903		72,421


Private label commercial CMOs	94,354		299		225		94,428
Asset-backed and other	229,913		141		2,083		227,971
Totals	$	492,616	$	7,525	$	3,211	$	496,930
December 31, 2018


States and political subdivisions	$	144,596	$	1,919	$	1,511	$	145,004

GSE residential CMOs	110,421		332		2,689		108,064

Private label residential CMOs	144		0		1		143
Private label commercial CMOs	75,911		55		921		75,045
Asset-backed and other	138,535		126		1,073		137,588
Totals	$	469,607	$	2,432	$	6,195	$	465,844

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes AFS securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, aggregated by major security type and length of time in a continuous unrealized loss position.


	Less Than 12 Months								12 Months or More							Total
(Dollars in thousands)	# of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		# of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		# of Securities	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
June 30, 2019



GSE residential CMOs	0	0		0		4	43,662		903		4	43,662		903


Private label commercial CMOs	11	49,100		175		3	21,846		50		14	70,946		225
Asset-backed and other	14	173,546		1,691		2	19,066		392		16	192,612		2,083
Totals	25	$	222,646	$	1,866	9	$	84,574	$	1,345	34	$	307,220	$	3,211
December 31, 2018


States and political subdivisions	27	$	46,585	$	662	6	$	23,036	$	849	33	$	69,621	$	1,511

GSE residential CMOs	1	18,037		122		7	46,168		2,567		8	64,205		2,689

Private label residential CMOs	1	143		1		0	0		0		1	143		1
Private label commercial CMOs	11	56,499		712		2	6,349		209		13	62,848		921
Asset-backed and other	6	78,900		859		3	10,808		214		9	89,708		1,073
Totals	46	$	200,164	$	2,356	18	$	86,361	$	3,839	64	$	286,525	$	6,195

States and Political Subdivisions. The unrealized losses presented in the table above have been caused by a widening of spreads and/or a rise in interest rates from the time these securities were purchased. Management considers the investment rating, the state of the issuer of the security and other credit support in determining whether the security is OTTI. Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell them before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these securities to be OTTI at December 31, 2018.

GSE Residential CMOs. The unrealized losses presented in the table above have been caused by a widening of spreads and/or a rise in interest rates from the time these securities were purchased. The contractual terms of these securities do not permit the issuer to settle the securities at a price less than its par value basis. Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell them before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these securities to be OTTI at June 30, 2019 or at December 31, 2018.

Private Label Residential CMOs, Private Label Commercial CMOs and Asset-backed and Other. The unrealized losses presented in the table above have been caused by a widening of spreads and/or a rise in interest rates from the time the securities were purchased. Because the Company does not intend to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell them before recovery of their amortized cost basis, which may be maturity, the Company does not consider these securities to be OTTI at June 30, 2019 or at December 31, 2018.

The following table summarizes amortized cost and fair value of AFS securities by contractual maturity at June 30, 2019. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities if borrowers have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties. Securities not due at a single maturity date are shown separately.


	Available for Sale
(Dollars in thousands)	Amortized Cost		Fair Value
Due in one year or less	$	525	$	525
Due after one year through five years	0		0
Due after five years through ten years	23,446		24,326
Due after ten years	72,109		77,259
CMOs	166,623		166,849
Asset-backed and other	229,913		227,971
	$	492,616	$	496,930

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes proceeds from sales of AFS securities and gross gains and gross losses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Proceeds from sale of AFS securities	$	114,871	$	25,533	$	174,335	$	88,110
Gross gains	2,109		211		2,628		1,052
Gross losses	45		165		225		190

In July 2019, the Company sold an additional $18,000,000 of principally States and Political subdivisions securities at a net gain of approximately $2,300,000.

AFS securities with a fair value of $176,270,000 and $164,233,000 at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 were pledged to secure public funds and for other purposes as required or permitted by law.

NOTE 4. LOANS AND ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

The Company’s loan portfolio is grouped into classes to allow management to monitor the performance by the borrower and to monitor the yield on the portfolio. Consistent with ASU 2010-20, Disclosures about the Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Loan Losses, the segments are further broken down into classes to allow for differing risk characteristics within a segment.

The risks associated with lending activities differ among the various loan classes and are subject to the impact of changes in interest rates, market conditions of collateral securing the loans, and general economic conditions. All of these factors may adversely impact both the borrower’s ability to repay its loans and associated collateral.

The Company has various types of commercial real estate loans, which have differing levels of credit risk. Owner occupied commercial real estate loans are generally dependent upon the successful operation of the borrower’s business, with the cash flows generated from the business being the primary source of repayment of the loan. If the business suffers a downturn in sales or profitability, the borrower’s ability to repay the loan could be in jeopardy.

Non-owner occupied and multi-family commercial real estate loans and non-owner occupied residential loans present a different credit risk to the Company than owner occupied commercial real estate loans, as the repayment of the loan is dependent upon the borrower’s ability to generate a sufficient level of occupancy to produce rental income that exceeds debt service requirements and operating expenses. Lower occupancy or lease rates may result in a reduction in cash flows, which hinders the ability of the borrower to meet debt service requirements, and may result in lower collateral values. The Company generally recognizes that greater risk is inherent in these credit relationships as compared to owner occupied loans mentioned above.

Acquisition and development loans consist of 1-4 family residential construction and commercial and land development loans. The risk of loss on these loans is largely dependent on the Company’s ability to assess the property’s value at the completion of the project, which should exceed the property’s construction costs. During the construction phase, a number of factors could potentially negatively impact the collateral value, including cost overruns, delays in completing the project, competition, and real estate market conditions which may change based on the supply of similar properties in the area. In the event the collateral value at the completion of the project is not sufficient to cover the outstanding loan balance, the Company must rely upon other repayment sources, including, if any, the guarantors of the project or other collateral securing the loan.

Commercial and industrial loans include advances to local and regional businesses for general commercial purposes and include permanent and short-term working capital, machinery and equipment financing, and may be either in the form of lines of credit or term loans. Although commercial and industrial loans may be unsecured to our highest-rated borrowers, the majority of these loans are secured by the borrower’s accounts receivable, inventory and machinery and equipment. In a significant number of these loans, the collateral also includes the business real estate or the business owner’s personal real estate or assets. Commercial and industrial loans present credit exposure to the Company, as they are more susceptible to risk of loss during a downturn in the economy as borrowers may have greater difficulty in meeting their debt service requirements and the value of the collateral may decline. The Company attempts to mitigate this risk through its underwriting standards, including evaluating the creditworthiness of the borrower and, to the extent available, credit ratings on the business. Additionally, monitoring of the loans through annual renewals and meetings with the borrowers are typical. However, these procedures cannot eliminate the risk of loss associated with commercial and industrial lending.

Table of Contents

Municipal loans consist of extensions of credit to municipalities and school districts within the Company’s market area. These loans generally present a lower risk than commercial and industrial loans, as they are generally secured by the municipality’s full taxing authority, by revenue obligations, or by its ability to raise assessments on its customers for a specific utility.

The Company originates loans to its retail customers, including fixed-rate and adjustable first lien mortgage loans with the underlying 1-4 family owner occupied residential property securing the loan. The Company’s risk exposure is minimized in these types of loans through the evaluation of the creditworthiness of the borrower, including credit scores and debt-to-income ratios, and underwriting standards which limit the loan-to-value ratio to generally no more than 80% upon loan origination, unless the borrower obtains private mortgage insurance.

Home equity loans, including term loans and lines of credit, present a slightly higher risk to the Company than 1-4 family first liens, as these loans can be first or second liens on 1-4 family owner occupied residential property, but can have loan-to-value ratios of no greater than 90% of the value of the real estate taken as collateral. The creditworthiness of the borrower is considered including credit scores and debt-to-income ratios.

Installment and other loans’ credit risk are mitigated through prudent underwriting standards, including evaluation of the creditworthiness of the borrower through credit scores and debt-to-income ratios and, if secured, the collateral value of the assets. These loans can be unsecured or secured by assets the value of which may depreciate quickly or may fluctuate, and may present a greater risk to the Company than 1-4 family residential loans.

The following table presents the loan portfolio by segment and class, excluding residential LHFS, at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	170,272	$	129,650
Non-owner occupied	298,989		252,794
Multi-family	93,342		78,933
Non-owner occupied residential	121,364		100,367
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	12,801		7,385
Commercial and land development	57,027		42,051
Commercial and industrial	219,551		160,964
Municipal	48,358		50,982
Residential mortgage:
First lien	363,946		235,296
Home equity - term	15,989		12,208
Home equity - lines of credit	157,645		143,616
Installment and other loans	42,386		33,411
Total Loans ⁽¹⁾	$	1,601,670	$	1,247,657

⁽¹⁾Includes $453,280,000 and $135,009,000 of acquired loans at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

In order to monitor ongoing risk associated with its loan portfolio and specific loans within the segments, management uses an internal grading system. The first several rating categories, representing the lowest risk to the Bank, are combined and given a “Pass” rating. Management generally follows regulatory definitions in assigning criticized ratings to loans, including "Special Mention," "Substandard," "Doubtful" or "Loss." The Special Mention category includes loans that have potential weaknesses that may, if not monitored or corrected, weaken the asset or inadequately protect the Bank's position at some future date. These assets pose elevated risk, but their weakness does not yet justify a more severe, or classified rating. Substandard loans are classified as they have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses that jeopardize liquidation of the debt. These loans are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Bank will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. Substandard loans include loans that management has determined not to be impaired, as well as loans considered to be impaired. A Doubtful loan has a high probability of total or substantial loss, but because of specific pending events that may strengthen the asset, its classification as Loss is deferred. Loss loans are considered uncollectible, as the borrowers are often in bankruptcy, have suspended debt repayments, or have ceased business operations. Once a loan is classified as Loss, there is little prospect of collecting the loan’s principal or interest and it is charged-off.

Table of Contents

The Company has a loan review policy and program which is designed to identify and monitor risk in the lending function. The ERM Committee, comprised of executive officers and loan department personnel, is charged with the oversight of overall credit quality and risk exposure of the Company's loan portfolio. This includes the monitoring of the lending activities of all Company personnel with respect to underwriting and processing new loans and the timely follow-up and corrective action for loans showing signs of deterioration in quality. A loan review program provides the Company with an independent review of the commercial loan portfolio on an ongoing basis. Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the Pass categories unless a specific action, such as extended delinquencies, bankruptcy, repossession or death of the borrower occurs, which heightens awareness as to a possible credit event.

Internal loan reviews are completed annually on all commercial relationships with a committed loan balance in excess of $500,000, which includes confirmation of risk rating by an independent credit officer. Credit Administration also reviews loans in excess of $1,000,000. In addition, all commercial relationships greater than $250,000 rated Substandard, Doubtful or Loss are reviewed quarterly and corresponding risk ratings are reaffirmed by the Company's Problem Loan Committee, with subsequent reporting to the ERM Committee.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the Company’s loan portfolio ratings based on its internal risk rating system at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Non-Impaired Substandard		Impaired - Substandard		Doubtful		PCI Loans		Total
June 30, 2019
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	158,247	$	1,366	$	878	$	1,737	$	0	$	8,044	$	170,272
Non-owner occupied	286,669		10,935		0		0		0		1,385		298,989
Multi-family	86,765		5,065		700		114		0		698		93,342
Non-owner occupied residential	114,607		2,264		1,156		270		0		3,067		121,364
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	12,151		650		0		0		0		0		12,801
Commercial and land development	56,268		188		571		0		0		0		57,027
Commercial and industrial	198,699		9,523		6,946		253		0		4,130		219,551
Municipal	48,358		0		0		0		0		0		48,358
Residential mortgage:
First lien	351,523		0		0		2,392		0		10,031		363,946
Home equity - term	15,877		79		0		12		0		21		15,989
Home equity - lines of credit	156,731		187		22		705		0		0		157,645
Installment and other loans	42,089		0		0		8		0		289		42,386
	$	1,527,984	$	30,257	$	10,273	$	5,491	$	0	$	27,665	$	1,601,670

December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	121,903	$	3,024	$	987	$	1,880	$	0	$	1,856	$	129,650
Non-owner occupied	242,136		10,008		0		0		0		650		252,794
Multi-family	71,482		5,886		717		131		0		717		78,933
Non-owner occupied residential	97,590		736		1,197		309		0		535		100,367
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	7,385		0		0		0		0		0		7,385
Commercial and land development	41,251		25		583		0		0		192		42,051
Commercial and industrial	150,286		2,278		2,940		286		0		5,174		160,964
Municipal	50,982		0		0		0		0		0		50,982
Residential mortgage:
First lien	229,971		0		0		2,877		0		2,448		235,296
Home equity - term	12,170		0		0		16		0		22		12,208
Home equity - lines of credit	142,638		165		15		798		0		0		143,616
Installment and other loans	33,229		15		1		0		0		166		33,411
	$	1,201,023	$	22,137	$	6,440	$	6,297	$	0	$	11,760	$	1,247,657

For commercial real estate, acquisition and development and commercial and industrial loans, a loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect the scheduled payments of principal or interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Factors considered by

Table of Contents

management in determining impairment include payment status, collateral value, and the probability of collecting scheduled principal and interest payments when due. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls generally are not classified as impaired. Generally, loans that are more than 90 days past due are deemed impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of the shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed to determine if the loan should be placed on nonaccrual status. Nonaccrual loans in the commercial and commercial real estate portfolios and any TDRs are, by definition, deemed to be impaired. Impairment is measured on a loan-by-loan basis for commercial, construction and restructured loans by either the present value of the expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. A loan is collateral dependent if the repayment of the loan is expected to be provided solely by the underlying collateral. For loans that are deemed to be impaired for extended periods of time, periodic updates on fair values are obtained, which may include updated appraisals. Updated fair values are incorporated into the impairment analysis in the next reporting period.

Loan charge-offs, which may include partial charge-offs, are taken on an impaired loan that is collateral dependent if the loan’s carrying balance exceeds its collateral’s appraised value, the loan has been identified as uncollectible, and it is deemed to be a confirmed loss. Typically, impaired loans with a charge-off or partial charge-off will continue to be considered impaired, unless the note is split into two, and management expects the performing note to continue to perform and is adequately secured. The second, or non-performing note, would be charged-off. Generally, an impaired loan with a partial charge-off may continue to have an impairment reserve on it after the partial charge-off, if factors warrant.

At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, nearly all of the Company’s impaired loans’ extent of impairment were measured based on the estimated fair value of the collateral securing the loan, except for TDRs. By definition, TDRs are considered impaired. All restructured loans’ impairment was determined based on discounted cash flows for those loans classified as TDRs and still accruing interest. For real estate loans, collateral generally consists of commercial real estate, but in the case of commercial and industrial loans, it could also consist of accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or other business assets. Commercial and industrial loans may also have real estate collateral.

Updated appraisals are generally required every 18 months for classified commercial loans in excess of $250,000. The “as is" value provided in the appraisal is often used as the fair value of the collateral in determining impairment, unless circumstances, such as subsequent improvements, approvals, or other circumstances, dictate that another value than that provided by the appraiser is more appropriate.

Generally, impaired commercial loans secured by real estate, other than performing TDRs, are measured at fair value using certified real estate appraisals that had been completed within the last 18 months. Appraised values are discounted for estimated costs to sell the property and other selling considerations to arrive at the property’s fair value. In those situations in which it is determined an updated appraisal is not required for loans individually evaluated for impairment, fair values are based on one or a combination of approaches. In those situations in which a combination of approaches is considered, the factor that carries the most consideration will be the one management believes is warranted. The approaches are:

•Original appraisal – if the original appraisal provides a strong loan-to-value ratio (generally 70% or lower) and, after consideration of market conditions and knowledge of the property and area, it is determined by the Credit Administration staff that there has not been a significant deterioration in the collateral value, the original certified appraised value may be used. Discounts as deemed appropriate for selling costs are factored into the appraised value in arriving at fair value.

•Discounted cash flows – in limited cases, discounted cash flows may be used on projects in which the collateral is liquidated to reduce the borrowings outstanding, and is used to validate collateral values derived from other approaches.

Collateral on certain impaired loans is not limited to real estate, and may consist of accounts receivable, inventory, equipment or other business assets. Estimated fair values are determined based on borrowers’ financial statements, inventory ledgers, accounts receivable agings or appraisals from individuals with knowledge in the business. Stated balances are generally discounted for the age of the financial information or the quality of the assets. In determining fair value, liquidation discounts are applied to this collateral based on existing loan evaluation policies.

The Company distinguishes Substandard loans on both an impaired and nonimpaired basis, as it places less emphasis on a loan’s classification, and increased reliance on whether the loan was performing in accordance with the contractual terms. A Substandard classification does not automatically meet the definition of impaired. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of Substandard loans, does not have to exist in individual extensions of credit classified Substandard. As a result, the Company’s methodology includes an evaluation of certain accruing commercial real estate, acquisition and

Table of Contents

development and commercial and industrial loans rated Substandard to be collectively, as opposed to individually, evaluated for impairment. Although the Company believes these loans meet the definition of Substandard, they are generally performing and management has concluded that it is likely we will be able to collect the scheduled payments of principal and interest when due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.

Larger groups of smaller balance homogeneous loans are collectively evaluated for impairment. Generally, the Company does not separately identify individual consumer and residential loans for impairment disclosures, unless such loans are the subject of a restructuring agreement due to financial difficulties of the borrower.

The following table, which excludes PCI loans, summarizes impaired loans by segment and class, segregated by those for which a specific allowance was required and those for which a specific allowance was not required at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The recorded investment in loans excludes accrued interest receivable due to insignificance. Related allowances established generally pertain to those loans in which loan forbearance agreements were in the process of being negotiated or updated appraisals were pending, and any partial charge-off will be recorded when final information is received.


	Impaired Loans with a Specific Allowance										Impaired Loans with No Specific Allowance
(Dollars in thousands)	Recorded Investment (Book Balance)		Unpaid Principal Balance (Legal Balance)		Related Allowance		Recorded Investment (Book Balance)		Unpaid Principal Balance (Legal Balance)
June 30, 2019
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	1,737	$	2,509

Multi-family	0		0		0		114		329
Non-owner occupied residential	0		0		0		270		612



Commercial and industrial	0		0		0		253		439
Residential mortgage:
First lien	554		554		37		1,838		2,940
Home equity - term	0		0		0		12		20
Home equity - lines of credit	0		0		0		705		999
Installment and other loans	0		0		0		8		17
	$	554	$	554	$	37	$	4,937	$	7,865
December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	1,880	$	2,576

Multi-family	0		0		0		131		336
Non-owner occupied residential	0		0		0		309		632



Commercial and industrial	0		0		0		286		457
Residential mortgage:
First lien	743		743		38		2,134		2,727
Home equity - term	0		0		0		16		23
Home equity - lines of credit	0		0		0		798		1,081

	$	743	$	743	$	38	$	5,554	$	7,832

Table of Contents

The following table, which excludes PCI loans, summarizes the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related recognized interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	2019						2018
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Impaired Balance		Interest Income Recognized		Average Impaired Balance		Interest Income Recognized
Three Months Ended June 30,
Commercial real estate:
Owner-occupied	$	1,770	$	1	$	1,233	$	0
Non-owner occupied	0		0		2,960		0
Multi-family	118		0		153		0
Non-owner occupied residential	282		0		356		0
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	0		0		201		0

Commercial and industrial	260		0		330		0
Residential mortgage:
First lien	2,512		14		3,310		14
Home equity – term	13		0		20		0
Home equity - lines of credit	709		1		667		1
Installment and other loans	9		0		5		0
	$	5,673	$	16	$	9,235	$	15
Six Months Ended June 30,
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	1,819	$	1	$	1,233	$	1
Non-owner occupied	0		0		3,421		0
Multi-family	122		0		157		0
Non-owner occupied residential	291		0		364		0
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	0		0		250		0

Commercial and industrial	269		0		336		0
Residential mortgage:
First lien	2,652		29		3,538		29
Home equity - term	14		0		20		0
Home equity - lines of credit	736		1		589		1
Installment and other loans	8		0		8		0
	$	5,911	$	31	$	9,916	$	31

Table of Contents

The following table presents impaired loans that are TDRs, with the recorded investment at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)	Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment		Number of Contracts	Recorded Investment
Accruing:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	1	$	31	1	$	39



Residential mortgage:
First lien	11	1,052		11	1,069
Home equity - lines of credit	1	21		1	24
	13	1,104		13	1,132
Nonaccruing:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	1	34		1	37



Residential mortgage:
First lien	7	438		8	658

	8	472		9	695
	21	$	1,576	22	$	1,827

There were no modified restructured loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 or 2018. No additional commitments have been made to borrowers whose loans are considered TDRs.

Table of Contents

Management further monitors the performance and credit quality of the loan portfolio by analyzing the length of time a portfolio is past due, by aggregating loans based on its delinquencies. The following table presents the classes of loan portfolio summarized by aging categories of performing loans and nonaccrual loans at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


			Days Past Due
(Dollars in thousands)	Current		30-59		60-89		90+ (still accruing)		Total Past Due		Non- Accrual		Total Loans
June 30, 2019
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	160,522	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	1,706	$	162,228
Non-owner occupied	297,509		95		0		0		95		0		297,604
Multi-family	92,280		250		0		0		250		114		92,644
Non-owner occupied residential	117,729		298		0		0		298		270		118,297
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	12,801		0		0		0		0		0		12,801
Commercial and land development	57,002		0		25		0		25		0		57,027
Commercial and industrial	214,816		254		98		0		352		253		215,421
Municipal	48,358		0		0		0		0		0		48,358
Residential mortgage:
First lien	350,054		1,826		695		0		2,521		1,340		353,915
Home equity - term	15,951		5		0		0		5		12		15,968
Home equity - lines of credit	156,226		498		237		0		735		684		157,645
Installment and other loans	41,880		162		47		0		209		8		42,097
Subtotal	1,565,128		3,388		1,102		0		4,490		4,387		1,574,005
Loans acquired with credit deterioration:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	8,005		0		0		39		39		0		8,044
Non-owner occupied	605		0		0		780		780		0		1,385
Multi-family	698		0		0		0		0		0		698
Non-owner occupied residential	2,997		0		0		70		70		0		3,067



Commercial and industrial	3,781		121		173		55		349		0		4,130

Residential mortgage:
First lien	8,745		365		204		717		1,286		0		10,031
Home equity - term	16		0		5		0		5		0		21

Installment and other loans	219		68		2		0		70		0		289
Subtotal	25,066		554		384		1,661		2,599		0		27,665
	$	1,590,194	$	3,942	$	1,486	$	1,661	$	7,089	$	4,387	$	1,601,670

Table of Contents



			Days Past Due
(Dollars in thousands)	Current		30-59		60-89		90+ (still accruing)		Total Past Due		Non- Accrual		Total Loans
December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	125,887	$	66	$	0	$	0	$	66	$	1,841	$	127,794
Non-owner occupied	252,144		0		0		0		0		0		252,144
Multi-family	78,085		0		0		0		0		131		78,216
Non-owner occupied residential	99,268		226		29		0		255		309		99,832
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	7,385		0		0		0		0		0		7,385
Commercial and land development	41,822		37		0		0		37		0		41,859
Commercial and industrial	154,988		411		105		0		516		286		155,790
Municipal	50,982		0		0		0		0		0		50,982
Residential mortgage:
First lien	228,714		1,592		734		0		2,326		1,808		232,848
Home equity - term	11,487		678		5		0		683		16		12,186
Home equity - lines of credit	142,394		420		28		0		448		774		143,616
Installment and other loans	33,135		66		44		0		110		0		33,245
Subtotal	1,226,291		3,496		945		0		4,441		5,165		1,235,897
Loans acquired with credit deterioration:
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	1,784		0		72		0		72		0		1,856
Non-owner occupied	650		0		0		0		0		0		650
Multi-family	717		0		0		0		0		0		717
Non-owner occupied residential	535		0		0		0		0		0		535
Acquisition and development:

Commercial and land development	192		0		0		0		0		0		192
Commercial and industrial	4,943		231		0		0		231		0		5,174

Residential mortgage:
First lien	1,971		382		42		53		477		0		2,448
Home equity - term	17		5		0		0		5		0		22

Installment and other loans	149		13		0		4		17		0		166
Subtotal	10,958		631		114		57		802		0		11,760
	$	1,237,249	$	4,127	$	1,059	$	57	$	5,243	$	5,165	$	1,247,657

The Company maintains its ALL at a level management believes adequate for probable incurred credit losses. The ALL is established and maintained through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Quarterly, management assesses the adequacy of the ALL utilizing a defined methodology which considers specific credit evaluation of impaired loans as discussed above, past loan loss historical experience, and qualitative factors. Management believes its approach properly addresses relevant accounting guidance for loans individually identified as impaired and for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, and other bank regulatory guidance.

Table of Contents

In connection with its quarterly evaluation of the adequacy of the ALL, management reviews its methodology to determine if it properly addresses the current risk in the loan portfolio. For each loan class, general allowances based on quantitative factors, principally historical loss trends, are provided for loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment. An adjustment to historical loss factors may be incorporated for delinquency and other potential risk not elsewhere defined within the ALL methodology.

In addition to this quantitative analysis, adjustments to the ALL requirements are allocated on loans collectively evaluated for impairment based on additional qualitative factors, including:

Nature and Volume of Loans – including loan growth in the current and subsequent quarters based on the Company’s targeted growth and strategic plan, coupled with the types of loans booked based on risk management and credit culture; the number of exceptions to loan policy; and supervisory loan to value exceptions.

Concentrations of Credit and Changes within Credit Concentrations – including the composition of the Company’s overall portfolio makeup and management's evaluation related to concentration risk management and the inherent risk associated with the concentrations identified.

Underwriting Standards and Recovery Practices – including changes to underwriting standards and perceived impact on anticipated losses; trends in the number of exceptions to loan policy; supervisory loan to value exceptions; and administration of loan recovery practices.

Delinquency Trends – including delinquency percentages noted in the portfolio relative to economic conditions; severity of the delinquencies; and whether the ratios are trending upwards or downwards.

Classified Loans Trends – including internal loan ratings of the portfolio; severity of the ratings; whether the loan segment’s ratings show a more favorable or less favorable trend; and underlying market conditions and impact on the collateral values securing the loans.

Experience, Ability and Depth of Management/Lending staff – including the years’ experience of senior and middle management and the lending staff; turnover of the staff; and instances of repeat criticisms of ratings.

Quality of Loan Review – including the years of experience of the loan review staff; in-house versus outsourced provider of review; turnover of staff and the perceived quality of their work in relation to other external information.

National and Local Economic Conditions – including trends in the consumer price index, unemployment rates, the housing price index, housing statistics compared to the prior year, bankruptcy rates, regulatory and legal environment risks and competition.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the activity in the ALL for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Commercial																		Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate		Acquisition and Development		Commercial and Industrial		Municipal		Total		Residential Mortgage		Installment and Other		Total		Unallocated		Total
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019
Balance, beginning of period	$	7,025	$	969	$	1,814	$	98	$	9,906	$	3,765	$	217	$	3,982	$	395	$	14,283
Provision for loan losses	(221)		39		325		(4)		139		(32)		40		8		53		200
Charge-offs	0		0		(47)		0		(47)		(25)		(51)		(76)		0		(123)
Recoveries	43		0		28		0		71		26		3		29		0		100
Balance, end of period	$	6,847	$	1,008	$	2,120	$	94	$	10,069	$	3,734	$	209	$	3,943	$	448	$	14,460
June 30, 2018
Balance, beginning of period	$	6,770	$	510	$	1,590	$	83	$	8,953	$	3,382	$	204	$	3,586	$	461	$	13,000
Provision for loan losses	(418)		208		8		(3)		(205)		237		44		281		124		200
Charge-offs	0		0		0		0		0		(86)		(47)		(133)		0		(133)
Recoveries	328		2		0		0		330		11		29		40		0		370
Balance, end of period	$	6,680	$	720	$	1,598	$	80	$	9,078	$	3,544	$	230	$	3,774	$	585	$	13,437
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019
Balance, beginning of period	$	6,876	$	817	$	1,656	$	98	$	9,447	$	3,753	$	244	$	3,997	$	570	$	14,014
Provision for loan losses	(118)		189		484		(4)		551		157		14		171		(122)		600
Charge-offs	(25)		0		(90)		0		(115)		(271)		(71)		(342)		0		(457)
Recoveries	114		2		70		0		186		95		22		117		0		303
Balance, end of period	$	6,847	$	1,008	$	2,120	$	94	$	10,069	$	3,734	$	209	$	3,943	$	448	$	14,460
June 30, 2018
Balance, beginning of period	$	6,763	$	417	$	1,446	$	84	$	8,710	$	3,400	$	211	$	3,611	$	475	$	12,796
Provision for loan losses	(411)		300		152		(4)		37		202		51		253		110		400
Charge-offs	0		0		0		0		0		(86)		(118)		(204)		0		(204)
Recoveries	328		3		0		0		331		28		86		114		0		445
Balance, end of period	$	6,680	$	720	$	1,598	$	80	$	9,078	$	3,544	$	230	$	3,774	$	585	$	13,437

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the ending loan balance individually evaluated for impairment based upon loan segment, as well as the related ALL loss allocation for each at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, excluding PCI loans.


	Commercial																		Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate		Acquisition and Development		Commercial and Industrial		Municipal		Total		Residential Mortgage		Installment and Other		Total		Unallocated		Total
June 30, 2019
Loans allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,121	$	0	$	253	$	0	$	2,374	$	3,109	$	8	$	3,117	$	0	$	5,491
Collectively evaluated for impairment	681,846		69,828		219,298		48,358		1,019,330		534,471		42,378		576,849		0		1,596,179
	$	683,967	$	69,828	$	219,551	$	48,358	$	1,021,704	$	537,580	$	42,386	$	579,966	$	0	$	1,601,670
ALL allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	37	$	0	$	37	$	0	$	37
Collectively evaluated for impairment	6,847		1,008		2,120		94		10,069		3,697		209		3,906		448		14,423
	$	6,847	$	1008	$	2,120	$	94	$	10,069	$	3,734	$	209	$	3,943	$	448	$	14,460
December 31, 2018
Loans allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,320	$	0	$	286	$	0	$	2,606	$	3,691	$	0	$	3,691	$	0	$	6,297
Collectively evaluated for impairment	559,424		49,436		160,678		50,982		820,520		387,429		33,411		420,840		0		1,241,360
	$	561,744	$	49,436	$	160,964	$	50,982	$	823,126	$	391,120	$	33,411	$	424,531	$	0	$	1,247,657
ALL allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	38	$	0	$	38	$	0	$	38
Collectively evaluated for impairment	6,876		817		1,656		98		9,447		3,715		244		3,959		570		13,976
	$	6,876	$	817	$	1,656	$	98	$	9,447	$	3,753	$	244	$	3,997	$	570	$	14,014

The following table provides activity for the accretable yield of purchased credit impaired loans for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019.


	Three Months Ended				Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2019
Accretable yield, beginning of period	$	1,894	$	2,065
New loans purchased	3,497		3,497
Accretion of income	(1,221)		(1,392)
Reclassifications from nonaccretable difference due to improvement in expected cash flows	617		617
Other changes, net	201		201
Accretable yield, end of period	$	4,988	$	4,988

Table of Contents

NOTE 5. GOODWILL AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

The following table presents changes in goodwill at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Balance, beginning of year	$	12,592	$	719
Acquired goodwill	7,029		11,873

Balance, end of period	$	19,621	$	12,592

The following table presents changes in other intangible assets for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	QTD						YTD/YE
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018		June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018
Beginning of period	$	3,702	$	332	$	3,910	$	356
Acquired CDI	4,550		0		4,550		0

Non-compete agreement	290		0		290		0
Amortization Expense	(402)		(24)		(610)		(48)
Balance, end of period	$	8,140	$	308	$	8,140	$	308

The following table presents the components of other identifiable intangible assets at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


	June 30, 2019						December 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)	Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization		Gross Amount		Accumulated Amortization
Amortized intangible assets:
Core deposit intangibles	$	8,390	$	708	$	3,840	$	190
Other customer relationship intangibles	931		715		931		671
Non-compete agreement	290		48		0		0
Total	$	9,611	$	1,471	$	4,771	$	861

The following table presents estimated aggregate amortization expense for intangible assets remaining at June 30, 2019.


(Dollars in thousands)
2019	$	960
2020	1,591
2021	1,313
2022	1,137
2023	960
Thereafter	2,179
	$	8,140

Table of Contents

NOTE 6. LEASES

A lease provides the lessee the right to control the use of an identified asset for a period of time in exchange for consideration. The Company has primarily entered into operating leases for branches and office space. Most of our leases contain renewal options, which we are reasonably certain to exercise. Including renewal options, our leases range from 3 years to 50 years Operating lease right-of-use assets and lease liabilities are included in Other assets and Accrued interest and other liabilities on the Company's Consolidated Balance Sheet.

The Company uses its incremental borrowing rate to determine the present value of the lease payments, as the rate implicit in the Company's leases is not readily determinable. Lease agreements that contain non-lease components are generally accounted for as a single lease component, while variable costs, such as common area maintenance expenses and property taxes, are expensed as incurred.

The following table summarizes the Company's ROU assets and related lease liabilities for the three and six months at June 30, 2019.


	Three Months Ended		Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2019
Cash paid for operating lease liabilities	281		$	461
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for operating lease obligations ⁽¹⁾	2,746		$	10,861
Weighted-average remaining lease term (in years)	17.5		17.5
Weighted-average discount rate	4.5	%	4.5		%

⁽¹⁾ Includes $7,971,000 for operating leases existing on January 1, 2019, and $144,000 for operating leases that commenced in the first quarter of 2019, and $2,746,000 for operating leases that were acquired in the second quarter of 2019.

The following table presents maturities of the Company's lease liabilities.


(Dollars in thousands)
Remainder of 2019	$	662
2020	1,336
2021	1,207
2022	788
2023	810
2024	801
Thereafter	11,025
	16,629
Less imputed interest	5,929
Total lease liabilities	$	10,700

Table of Contents

NOTE 7. INCOME TAXES

The Company files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and the State of Maryland. The Company is no longer subject to tax examination by tax authorities for years before 2015.

The following table summarizes income tax expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Current expense	$	69	$	125	$	90	$	348


Deferred expense	41		249		252		518




Income tax expense	$	110	$	374	$	342	$	866

Income tax expense includes $433,000 and $10,000 related to net securities gains for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and $505,000 and $181,000 related to net security gains for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

The following table summarizes deferred tax assets and liabilities at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Deferred tax assets:
Allowance for loan losses	$	3,392	$	3,143
Deferred compensation	755		723
Retirement and salary continuation plans	1,956		1,416
Share-based compensation	832		742
Off-balance sheet reserves	265		219
Nonaccrual loan interest	839		537
Net unrealized losses on AFS securities	0		791
Purchase accounting adjustments	4,571		1,795
Bonus accrual	216		470
Low-income housing credit carryforward	496		641



Net operating loss carryovers	1,859		0

Other	1,288		321
Total deferred tax assets	16,469		10,798
Deferred tax liabilities:
Depreciation	433		458
Net unrealized gains on AFS securities	906		0
Mortgage servicing rights	674		590

Purchase accounting adjustments	1,765		1,021
Other	231		150
Total deferred tax liabilities	4,009		2,219
Net deferred tax asset, included in Other Assets	$	12,460	$	8,579

The provision for income taxes differs from that computed by applying statutory rates to income before income taxes, primarily due to the effects of tax-exempt income, non-deductible expenses and tax credits. In the first quarter of 2019, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $185,000, related to a favorable tax law clarification concerning the treatment of life insurance assets of an acquired entity. In the second quarter of 2019, the Company recorded a tax benefit of $334,000, related to an increase in its deferred state income tax asset for the effect of the state tax rate change resulting from the Hamilton acquisition.

At June 30, 2019, the Company had low-income housing credit carryforwards that expire through 2038 and acquired federal and state net operating loss carryforwards, that are subject to annual loss limitation limits, that expire in years through 2037.

Table of Contents

NOTE 8. SHARE-BASED COMPENSATION PLANS

The Company maintains share-based compensation plans under the shareholder-approved 2011 Plan. The purpose of the share-based compensation plans is to provide officers, employees, and non-employee members of the Board of Directors of the Company with additional incentive to further the success of the Company. At June 30, 2019, 881,920 shares of the common stock of the Company were reserved to be issued and 493,239 shares were available to be issued.

The 2011 Plan incentive awards may consist of grants of incentive stock options, nonqualified stock options, stock appreciation rights, restricted stock, deferred stock units and performance shares. All employees of the Company and its present or future subsidiaries, and members of the Board of Directors of the Company or any subsidiary of the Company, are eligible to participate in the 2011 Plan. The 2011 Plan allows for the Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors to determine the type of incentive to be awarded, its term, manner of exercise, vesting of awards and restrictions on shares. Generally, awards are nonqualified under the IRC, unless the awards are deemed to be incentive awards to employees at the Compensation Committee’s discretion.

The table below presents a summary of nonvested restricted shares activity for the six months ended June 30, 2019.


	Shares	Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
Nonvested shares, beginning of year	275,412	$	20.33
Granted	75,293	19.49
Forfeited	(34,680)	19.18
Vested	(23,405)	17.69
Nonvested shares, at period end	292,620	$	20.44

The following table presents restricted shares compensation expense, with tax benefit information, and fair value of shares vested, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Restricted share award expense	$	181	$	444	$	676	$	920
Restricted share award tax benefit	38		93		148		193
Fair value of shares vested	0		659		444		1056

The unrecognized compensation expense related to the share awards totaled $2,245,000 at June 30, 2019 and $2,115,000 at December 31, 2018. The unrecognized compensation expense at June 30, 2019 is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of 1.8 years.

The following table presents a summary of outstanding stock options activity for the six months ended June 30, 2019.


	Shares	Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year	40,984	$	24.34

Expired	(5,335)	28.21

Options outstanding and exercisable	35,649	$	23.76

The exercise price of each option equals the market price of the Company’s stock on the grant date. An option’s maximum term is ten years. All options are fully vested upon issuance. The following table presents information pertaining to options outstanding and exercisable at June 30, 2019.


Range of Exercise Prices	Number Outstanding	Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (Years)	Weighted Average Exercise Price
$21.14 - $24.99	27,767	1.06	$	21.14
$25.00 - $34.99	2,792	0.76	25.76

$35.00 - $37.59	5,090	0.08	36.95

$21.14 - $37.59	35,649	0.90	$	23.76

Outstanding and exercisable options had an intrinsic value of $24,000 at June 30, 2019 and $0 at December 31, 2018.

The Company maintains an employee stock purchase plan to provide employees of the Company an opportunity to purchase Company common stock. Eligible employees may purchase shares in an amount that does not exceed 10% of their annual salary, at the lower of 95% of the fair market value of the shares on the semi-annual offering date or related purchase

Table of Contents

date. The Company reserved 350,000 shares of its common stock to be issued under the employee stock purchase plan. At June 30, 2019, 170,461 shares were available to be issued.

The following table presents information for the employee stock purchase plan for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands except share information)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Shares purchased	0		0		3,004		2,956
Weighted average price of shares purchased	$	0.00	$	0.00	$	18.96	$	23.47
Compensation expense recognized	0		0		3		4
Tax benefits	0		0		1		1

The Company issues new shares or treasury shares, depending on market conditions, in its share-based compensation plans.

NOTE 9. SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY AND REGULATORY CAPITAL

Banks and bank holding companies are subject to regulatory capital requirements administered by federal banking agencies. Capital adequacy guidelines and, additionally for banks, prompt corrective action regulations, involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classifications are also subject to qualitative judgments by regulators. Failure to meet capital requirements can initiate regulatory action. Under the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision's capital guidelines for U.S. Banks ("Basel III rules"), an entity must hold a capital conservation buffer above the adequately capitalized risk-based capital ratios. The required capital conservation buffer was 1.875% for 2018 and is 2.50% for 2019 under phase-in rules which were completed in 2019.

The consolidated asset limit on small bank holding companies is $3,000,000,000 and a company with assets under that limit is not subject to the FRB consolidated capital rules, but may file reports that include capital amounts and ratios. The Company has elected to file those reports.

Management believes that the Company and the Bank met all capital adequacy requirements to which they are subject at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

At June 30, 2019, the most recent regulatory notifications categorized the Bank as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action. There are no conditions or events since that notification that management believes have changed the Bank's classification. Prompt corrective action regulations provide five classifications: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized, although these terms are not used to represent overall financial condition. If adequately capitalized, regulatory approval is required to accept brokered deposits. If undercapitalized, capital distributions are limited, as is asset growth and expansion, and capital restoration plans are required.

Table of Contents

The following table presents capital amounts and ratios at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


	Actual						For Capital Adequacy Purposes (includes applicable capital conservation buffer)						To Be Well Capitalized Under Prompt Corrective Action Provisions
(Dollars in thousands)	Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio		Amount		Ratio
June 30, 2019
Total Capital to risk weighted assets
Consolidated	$	235,676	14.1	%	$	175,939	10.5	%	n/a		n/a
Bank	218,046		13.0	%	175,859		10.5	%	$	167,485	10.0	%
Tier 1 Capital to risk weighted assets
Consolidated	188,207		11.2	%	142,427		8.5	%	n/a		n/a
Bank	202,398		12.1	%	142,362		8.5	%	133,988		8.0	%
Common Tier 1 (CET1) to risk weighted assets
Consolidated	188,207		11.2	%	117,293		7.0	%	n/a		n/a
Bank	202,398		12.1	%	117,239		7.0	%	108,865		6.5	%
Tier 1 Capital to average assets
Consolidated	188,207		8.5	%	88,973		4.0	%	n/a		n/a
Bank	202,398		8.6	%	94,303		4.0	%	117,879		5.0	%
December 31, 2018
Total Capital to risk weighted assets
Consolidated	$	206,988	15.6	%	$	131,393	9.875	%	n/a		n/a
Bank	177,892		13.4	%	131,286		9.875	%	$	132,948	10.0	%
Tier 1 Capital to risk weighted assets
Consolidated	160,117		12.0	%	104,782		7.875	%	n/a		n/a
Bank	162,880		12.3	%	104,696		7.875	%	106,358		8.0	%
Common Tier 1 (CET1) to risk weighted assets
Consolidated	160,117		12.0	%	84,823		6.375	%	n/a		n/a
Bank	162,880		12.3	%	84,754		6.375	%	86,416		6.5	%
Tier 1 Capital to average assets
Consolidated	160,117		8.4	%	76,089		4.0	%	n/a		n/a
Bank	162,880		8.6	%	76,113		4.0	%	95,142		5.0	%

In September 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a share repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase up to 5% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock, or approximately 416,000 shares, in accordance with all applicable securities laws and regulations, including Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. When and if appropriate, repurchases may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions, regulatory requirements and other corporate considerations, as determined by management. Share repurchases may not occur and may be discontinued at any time. At June 30, 2019, 82,725 shares had been repurchased under the program at a total cost of $1,438,000, or $17.38 per share.

On July 24, 2019, the Board declared a cash dividend of $0.15 per common share, which will be paid on August 12, 2019 to shareholders of record at August 5, 2019.

Table of Contents

NOTE 10. EARNINGS PER SHARE

The following table presents earnings per share for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
(In thousands, except per share information)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Net income	$	2,687	$	4,012	$	5,789	$	7,637
Weighted average shares outstanding - basic	10,348		8,094		9,757		8,088
Dilutive effect of share-based compensation	166		189		166		187
Weighted average shares outstanding - diluted	10,514		8,283		9,923		8,275
Per share information:
Basic earnings per share	$	0.26	$	0.50	$	0.59	$	0.94
Diluted earnings per share	0.26		0.48		0.58		0.92

Average outstanding stock options of 37,000 and 22,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, and of 39,000 and 24,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, were not included in the computation of earnings per share because the effect was antidilutive, due to the exercise price exceeding the average market price. The dilutive effect of share-based compensation in each period above relates principally to restricted stock awards.

NOTE 11. FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS WITH OFF-BALANCE SHEET RISK

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments. The following table presents these contract, or notional, amounts.


	Contract or Notional Amount
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Commitments to fund:
Home equity lines of credit	$	197,374	$	160,971
1-4 family residential construction loans	29,312		13,002
Commercial real estate, construction and land development loans	30,839		31,133
Commercial, industrial and other loans	181,780		147,518
Standby letters of credit	16,546		13,909

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Company evaluates each customer’s credit-worthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation of the customer. Collateral varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, equipment, residential real estate, and income-producing commercial properties.

Standby letters of credit and financial guarantees written are conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Those guarantees are primarily issued to support public and private borrowing arrangements. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. The Company holds collateral supporting those commitments when deemed necessary by management. The liability, at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, for guarantees under standby letters of credit issued was not material.

Table of Contents

NOTE 12. FAIR VALUE

Fair value is the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. Certain financial instruments and all non-financial instruments are excluded from disclosure requirements. Accordingly, the aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company.

The fair value hierarchy distinguishes between (1) market participant assumptions developed based on market data obtained from independent sources (observable inputs) and (2) an entity's own assumptions about market participant assumptions based on the best information available in the circumstances (unobservable inputs). The fair value hierarchy consists of three broad levels, which gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (Level 1) and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs (Level 3). The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are:

Level 1 – quoted prices (unadjusted) for identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the entity has the ability to access at the measurement date.

Level 2 – significant other observable inputs other than Level 1 prices such as prices for similar assets and liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data.

Level 3 – at least one significant unobservable input that reflects a company's own assumptions about the assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability.

In instances in which multiple levels of inputs are used to measure fair value, hierarchy classification is based on the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement in its entirety. The Company's assessment of the significance of a particular input to the fair value measurement in its entirety requires judgment, and considers factors specific to the asset or liability.

The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value for instruments measured on a recurring basis:

Where quoted prices are available in an active market, securities are classified within Level 1 of the valuation hierarchy. Level 1 securities include highly liquid government bonds, mortgage products and exchange traded equities. If quoted market prices are not available, securities are classified within Level 2 and fair values are estimated by using pricing models, quoted prices of securities with similar characteristics or discounted cash flow. Level 2 securities include U.S. agency securities, mortgage-backed securities, obligations of states and political subdivisions and certain corporate, asset backed and other securities. In certain cases where there is limited activity or less transparency around inputs to the valuation, securities are classified within Level 3 of the valuation hierarchy. All of the Company’s securities are classified as available for sale.

Table of Contents

The Company had no fair value liabilities measured on a recurring basis at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


(Dollars in Thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value Measurements
June 30, 2019
AFS Securities:


States and political subdivisions	$	0	$	102,110	$	0	$	102,110

GSE residential CMOs	0		72,421		0		72,421


Private label commercial CMOs	0		87,098		7,330		94,428
Asset-backed and other	0		227,971		0		227,971
Totals	$	0	$	489,600	$	7,330	$	496,930

December 31, 2018
AFS Securities:


States and political subdivisions	$	0	$	145,004	$	0	$	145,004

GSE residential CMOs	0		108,064		0		108,064

Private label residential CMOs	0		143		0		143
Private label commercial CMOs	0		67,836		7,209		75,045
Asset-backed and other	0		137,588		0		137,588
Totals	$	0	$	458,635	$	7,209	$	465,844

One private label commercial CMO was measured at fair value on a recurring basis using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Fair value for this investment totaled $7,330,000 at June 30, 2019 and $7,209,000 at December 31, 2018. The investment was purchased at $7,213,000. Premium amortization expense totaling $19,000 and $41,000 was included in earnings for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019, and an unrealized gain of $88,000 and $199,000 was recognized in other comprehensive income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. The Level 3 valuation is based on a non-executable broker quote, which is considered a significant unobservable input. Such quotes are updated as available and may remain constant for a period of time for certain broker-quoted securities that do not move with the market or that are not interest rate sensitive as a result of their structure or overall attributes.

Certain financial assets are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Adjustments to the fair value of these assets usually result from the application of lower-of-cost-or-market accounting or write-downs of individual assets. The Company used the following methods and significant assumptions to estimate fair value for these financial assets.

Impaired Loans

Loans are designated as impaired when, in the judgment of management and based on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement, will not be collected. The measurement of loss associated with impaired loans for all loan classes can be based on either the observable market price of the loan, the fair value of the collateral, or discounted cash flows based on a market rate of interest for performing TDRs. For collateral-dependent loans, fair value is measured based on the value of the collateral securing the loan, less estimated costs to sell. Collateral may be in the form of real estate or business assets including equipment, inventory, and accounts receivable. The value of the real estate collateral is determined utilizing an income or market valuation approach based on an appraisal conducted by an independent, licensed appraiser outside of the Company using observable market data (Level 2). However, if the collateral is a house or building in the process of construction, or if management adjusts the appraisal value, then the fair value is considered Level 3. The value of business equipment is based upon an outside appraisal, if deemed significant, or the net book value on the applicable business’ financial statements if not considered significant using observable market data. Likewise, values for inventory and accounts receivable collateral are based on financial statement balances or aging reports (Level 3). Impaired loans with an allocation to the ALL are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis. Any fair value adjustments are recorded in the period incurred as provision for loan losses on the consolidated statements of income. Specific allocations to the ALL or partial charge-offs totaled $910,000 and $928,000 at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Table of Contents

The following table presents changes in the fair value for impaired loans still held at June 30, considered in the determination of the provision for loan losses, for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Three months ended June 30,						Six months ended June 30,
(Dollars in thousands)	2019		2018		2019		2018
Changes in fair value of impaired loans still held	$	24	$	79	$	28	$	84

Foreclosed Real Estate

OREO property acquired through foreclosure is initially recorded at the fair value of the property at the transfer date less estimated selling cost. Subsequently, OREO is carried at the lower of its carrying value or the fair value less estimated selling cost. Fair value is usually determined based upon an independent third-party appraisal of the property or occasionally upon a recent sales offer. Specific charges to value OREO at the lower of cost or fair value on properties held at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 both totaled $0. There were no changes in the fair value of OREO for properties, still held at June 30, that were charged to real estate expenses for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019. The fair value of OREO properties changed $13,000 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.

The following table summarizes assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


(Dollars in thousands)	Level 1		Level 2		Level 3		Total Fair Value Measurements
June 30, 2019
Impaired Loans
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	0	$	0	$	1,004	$	1,004

Multi-family	0		0		114		114
Non-owner occupied residential	0		0		243		243



Commercial and industrial	0		0		11		11
Residential mortgage:
First lien	0		0		787		787

Home equity - lines of credit	0		0		335		335
Installment and other loans	0		0		8		8
Total impaired loans	$	0	$	0	$	2,502	$	2,502








December 31, 2018
Impaired Loans
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	0	$	0	$	1,087	$	1,087

Multi-family	0		0		131		131
Non-owner occupied residential	0		0		278		278



Commercial and industrial	0		0		25		25
Residential mortgage:
First lien	0		0		1,121		1,121

Home equity - lines of credit	0		0		409		409

Total impaired loans	$	0	$	0	$	3,051	$	3,051

Table of Contents

The following table presents additional qualitative information about assets measured on a nonrecurring basis and for which the Company has utilized Level 3 inputs to determine fair value.

(Dollars in thousands)

Fair Value
Estimate

Valuation
Techniques

Unobservable Input

Range

June 30, 2019

Impaired loans

2,502

Appraisal of
collateral

Management adjustments on appraisals for property type and recent activity

5% - 25% discount

- Management adjustments for liquidation expenses

6% - 33% discount

December 31, 2018

Impaired loans

3,051

Appraisal of
collateral

Management adjustments on appraisals for property type and recent activity

5% - 75% discount

- Management adjustments for liquidation expenses

6% - 20% discount

Fair values of financial instruments

The following table presents carrying amounts and estimated fair values of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:


(Dollars in thousands)	Carrying Amount		Fair Value		Level 1		Level 2		Level 3
June 30, 2019
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	35,468	$	35,468	$	35,468	$	0	$	0
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	72,670		72,670		72,670		0		0
Federal Funds Sold	8,741		8,741		8,741		0		0
Restricted investments in bank stocks	10,105		n/a		n/a		n/a		n/a
AFS securities	496,930		496,930		0		489,600		7,330
Loans held for sale	7,152		7,344		0		7,344		0
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	1,587,210		1,617,064		0		0		1,617,064
Accrued interest receivable	6,558		6,558		0		1,943		4,615

Financial Liabilities
Deposits	2,015,541		2,013,623		0		2,013,623		0
Short-term borrowings	9,373		9,373		0		9,373		0
Long-term debt	83,261		83,550		0		83,550		0
Subordinated notes	31,821		33,276		0		33,276		0
Accrued interest payable	1,979		1,979		0		1,979		0
Off-balance sheet instruments	0		0		0		0		0

December 31, 2018
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	26,156	$	26,156	$	26,156	$	0	$	0
Interest-bearing deposits with banks	45,664		45,664		45,664		0		0
Federal Funds Sold	16,995		16,995		16,995		0		0
Restricted investments in bank stocks	10,842		n/a		n/a		n/a		n/a
AFS securities	465,844		465,844		0		458,635		7,209
Loans held for sale	3,340		3,413		0		3,413		0
Loans, net of allowance for loan losses	1,233,643		1,229,645		0		0		1,229,645
Accrued interest receivable	5,927		5,927		0		2,853		3,074

Financial Liabilities
Deposits	1,558,756		1,555,912		0		1,555,912		0
Short-term borrowings	64,069		64,069		0		64,069		0
Long-term debt	83,450		82,951		0		82,951		0
Subordinated notes	31,859		31,256		0		31,256		0
Accrued interest payable	1,301		1,301		0		1,301		0
Off-balance sheet instruments	0		0		0		0		0

Table of Contents

The methods utilized to measure the fair value of financial instruments at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018 represent an approximation of exit price; however, an actual exit price may differ.

NOTE 13. REVENUE FROM CONTRACTS WITH CUSTOMERS

All of the Company's revenue from contracts with customers within the scope of ASC 606 is recognized within noninterest income on the consolidated statements of income. Consistent with ASC 606, noninterest income covered by this guidance is recognized as services are transferred to our customers in an amount that reflects the consideration we expect to be entitled to in exchange for those services.

Service Charges on Deposit Accounts - The Company earns fees from its deposit customers for transaction-based, account maintenance, and overdraft services. Transaction-based fees, which include services such as ATM use fees, stop payment charges, statement rendering, and ACH fees, are recognized at the time the transaction is executed, as that is the point in time the Company fulfills the customer's request. Account maintenance fees, which relate primarily to monthly maintenance, are earned over the course of a month, representing the period over which the Company satisfies the performance obligation. Overdraft fees are recognized at the point in time that the overdraft occurs. Service charges on deposits are withdrawn from the customer's account balance.

Interchange Income - The Company earns interchange fees from debit/credit cardholder transactions conducted through the MasterCard payment network. Interchange fees from cardholder transactions represent a percentage of the underlying transaction value and are recognized daily, concurrently with the transaction processing services provided to the cardholder. Interchange income is presented net of cardholder rewards.

Wealth Management and Investment Advisory Income (Gross) - The Company earns wealth management and investment brokerage fees from its contracts with trust and wealth management customers to manage assets for investment, and/or to transact on their accounts. Asset management fees are primarily earned over time as the Company provides the contracted services and are generally assessed based on a tiered scale of the market value of assets under management. Fees that are transaction based, including trade execution services, are recognized at the point in time that the transaction is executed, i.e., the trade date. Other related services provided included financial planning services, and the fees the Company earns for such services, which are based on a fixed fee schedule, are recognized when the services are rendered. Services are generally billed in arrears and a receivable is recorded until fees are paid.

Investment Brokerage Income (Net) - The Company earns fees from investment management and brokerage services provided to its customers through a third-party service provider. The Company receives commissions from the third-party service provider and recognizes income on a weekly basis based upon customer activity. Because the Company acts as an agent in arranging the relationship between the customer and the third-party service provider and does not control the services rendered to the customers, investment brokerage income is presented net of related costs.

Gains/Losses on Sales of OREO - The Company records a gain or loss on the sale of OREO when control of the property transfers to the buyer, which generally occurs at the time of an executed deed. If the Company finances the sale of OREO to the buyer, the Company assesses whether the buyer is committed to perform their obligations under the contract and whether collectability of the transaction price is probable. Once these criteria are met, the OREO asset is derecognized and the gain or loss on sale is recorded upon the transfer of control of the property to the buyer. In determining the gain or loss on the sale, the Company adjusts the transaction price and related gain (loss) on sale if a significant financing component is present.

At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Company had receivables from customers totaling $728,000 and $640,000.

Table of Contents

The following table presents our noninterest income disaggregated by revenue source for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Three Months Ended						Six Months Ended
(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018		June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018
Noninterest income
Service charges on deposits	$	935	$	835	$	1,777	$	1,673
Trust and investment management income	1,749		1,701		3,507		3,369
Brokerage income	672		501		1,150		1,059
Merchant and bankcard fees (interchange income)	843		711		1,579		1,366
Revenue from contracts with customers	4,199		3,748		8,013		7,467

Other service charges	248		606		400		780
Mortgage banking activities	652		679		1,120		1,314
Income from life insurance	684		291		1,026		568
Other income	32		135		144		216
Investment securities gains	2,064		46		2,403		862
Total noninterest income	$	7,879	$	5,505	$	13,106	$	11,207

NOTE 14. CONTINGENCIES

The nature of the Company’s business generates a certain amount of litigation involving matters arising out of the ordinary course of business. Except as described below, in the opinion of management, there are no legal proceedings that might have a material effect on the results of operations, liquidity, or the financial position of the Company at this time.

On May 25, 2012, SEPTA filed a putative class action complaint in the U.S. District Court for the Middle District of Pennsylvania against the Company, the Bank and certain current and former directors and executive officers (collectively, the “Defendants”). The complaint alleges, among other things, that (i) in connection with the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 dated February 23, 2010 and its Prospectus Supplement dated March 23, 2010, and (ii) during the purported class period of March 24, 2010 through October 27, 2011, the Company issued materially false and misleading statements regarding the Company’s lending practices and financial results, including misleading statements concerning the stringent nature of the Bank’s credit practices and underwriting standards, the quality of its loan portfolio, and the intended use of the proceeds from the Company’s March 2010 public offering of common stock. The complaint asserts claims under Sections 11, 12(a) and 15 of the Securities Act of 1933, Sections 10(b) and 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 10b-5 promulgated thereunder, and seeks class certification, unspecified money damages, interest, costs, fees and equitable or injunctive relief. Under the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 (“PSLRA”), motions for appointment of Lead Plaintiff in this case were due by July 24, 2012. SEPTA was the sole movant and the Court appointed SEPTA Lead Plaintiff on August 20, 2012.

Pursuant to the PSLRA and the Court’s September 27, 2012 Order, SEPTA was given until October 26, 2012 to file an amended complaint and the Defendants until December 7, 2012 to file a motion to dismiss the amended complaint. SEPTA’s opposition to the Defendant’s motion to dismiss was originally due January 11, 2013. Under the PSLRA, discovery and all other proceedings in the case were stayed pending the Court’s ruling on the motion to dismiss. The September 27, 2012 Order specified that if the motion to dismiss were denied, the Court would schedule a conference to address discovery and the filing of a motion for class certification. On October 26, 2012, SEPTA filed an unopposed motion for enlargement of time to file its amended complaint in order to permit the parties and new defendants to be named in the amended complaint time to discuss plaintiff’s claims and defendants’ defenses. On October 26, 2012, the Court granted SEPTA’s motion, mooting its September 27, 2012 scheduling Order, and requiring SEPTA to file its amended complaint on or before January 16, 2013 or otherwise advise the Court of circumstances that require a further enlargement of time. On January 14, 2013, the Court granted SEPTA’s second unopposed motion for enlargement of time to file an amended complaint on or before March 22, 2013.

On March 4, 2013, SEPTA filed an amended complaint. The amended complaint expands the list of defendants in the action to include the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm and the underwriters of the Company’s March 2010 public offering of common stock. In addition, among other things, the amended complaint extends the purported 1934 Exchange Act class period from March 15, 2010 through April 5, 2012. Pursuant to the Court’s March 28, 2013 Second Scheduling Order, on May 28, 2013, all defendants filed their motions to dismiss the amended complaint, and on July 22, 2013, SEPTA filed its “omnibus” opposition to all of the defendants’ motions to dismiss. On August 23, 2013, all defendants filed

Table of Contents

reply briefs in further support of their motions to dismiss. On December 5, 2013, the Court ordered oral argument on the Orrstown Defendants’ motion to dismiss the amended complaint to be heard on February 7, 2014. Oral argument on the pending motions to dismiss SEPTA’s amended complaint was held on April 29, 2014.

The Second Scheduling Order stayed all discovery in the case pending the outcome of the motions to dismiss, and informed the parties that, if required, a telephonic conference to address discovery and the filing of SEPTA’s motion for class certification would be scheduled after the Court’s ruling on the motions to dismiss.

On April 10, 2015, pursuant to Court order, all parties filed supplemental briefs addressing the impact of the U.S. Supreme Court’s March 24, 2015 decision in Omnicare, Inc. v. Laborers District Council Construction Industry Pension Fund on defendants’ motions to dismiss the amended complaint.

On June 22, 2015, in a 96-page Memorandum, the Court dismissed without prejudice SEPTA’s amended complaint against all defendants, finding that SEPTA failed to state a claim under either the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. The Court ordered that, within 30 days, SEPTA either seek leave to amend its amended complaint, accompanied by the proposed amendment, or file a notice of its intention to stand on the amended complaint.

On July 22, 2015, SEPTA filed a motion for leave to amend under Local Rule 15.1, and attached a copy of its proposed second amended complaint to its motion. Many of the allegations of the proposed second amended complaint are essentially the same or similar to the allegations of the dismissed amended complaint. The proposed second amended complaint also alleges that the Orrstown Defendants did not publicly disclose certain alleged failures of internal controls over loan underwriting, risk management, and financial reporting during the period 2009 to 2012, in violation of the federal securities laws. On February 8, 2016, the Court granted SEPTA’s motion for leave to amend and SEPTA filed its second amended complaint that same day.

On February 25, 2016, the Court issued a scheduling Order directing: all defendants to file any motions to dismiss by March 18, 2016; SEPTA to file an omnibus opposition to defendants’ motions to dismiss by April 8, 2016; and all defendants to file reply briefs in support of their motions to dismiss by April 22, 2016. Defendants timely filed their motions to dismiss the second amended complaint and the parties filed their briefs in accordance with the Court-ordered schedule, above. The February 25, 2016 Order stays all discovery and other deadlines in the case (including the filing of SEPTA’s motion for class certification) pending the outcome of the motions to dismiss.

The allegations of SEPTA’s second amended complaint disclosed the existence of a confidential, non-public, fact-finding inquiry regarding the Company being conducted by the SEC. As disclosed in the Company’s Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2016, on that date the Company entered into a settlement agreement with the SEC resolving the investigation of accounting and related matters at the Company for the periods ended June 30, 2010, to December 31, 2011. As part of the settlement of the SEC’s administrative proceedings and pursuant to the cease-and-desist order, without admitting or denying the SEC’s findings, the Company, its Chief Executive Officer, its former Chief Financial Officer, its former Executive Vice President and Chief Credit Officer, and its Chief Accounting Officer, agreed to pay civil money penalties to the SEC. The Company agreed to pay a civil money penalty of $1,000,000. The Company had previously established a reserve for that amount which was expensed in the second fiscal quarter of 2016. In the settlement agreement with the SEC, the Company also agreed to cease and desist from committing or causing any violations and any future violations of Securities Act Sections 17(a)(2) and 17(a)(3) and Exchange Act Sections 13(a), 13(b)(2)(A) and 13(b)(2)(B), and Rules 12b-20, 13a-1 and 13a-13 promulgated thereunder.

On September 27, 2016, the Orrstown Defendants filed with the Court a Notice of Subsequent Event in Further Support of their Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, regarding the settlement with the SEC. The Notice attached a copy of the SEC’s cease-and-desist order and briefly described what the Company believed were the most salient terms of the neither-admit-nor-deny settlement. On September 29, 2016, SEPTA filed a Response to the Notice, in which SEPTA argued that the settlement with the SEC did not support dismissal of the second amended complaint.

On December 7, 2016, the Court issued an Order and Memorandum granting in part and denying in part defendants’ motions to dismiss SEPTA’s second amended complaint. The Court granted the motions to dismiss the Securities Act claims against all defendants, and granted the motions to dismiss the Exchange Act Section 10(b) and Rule 10b-5 claims against all defendants except Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., Orrstown Bank, Thomas R. Quinn, Jr., Bradley S. Everly, and Jeffrey W. Embly. The Court also denied the motions to dismiss the Exchange Act Section 20(a) claims against Quinn, Everly, and Embly.

On January 31, 2017, the Court entered a Case Management Order establishing the schedule for the litigation and, on August 15, 2017, it entered a revised Order that, among other things, set the following deadlines: all fact discovery closes on March 1, 2018, and SEPTA’s motion for class certification is due the same day; expert merits discovery closes May 30, 2018; summary judgment motions are due by June 26, 2018; the mandatory pretrial and settlement conference is set for December 11, 2018; and trial is scheduled to begin on January 7, 2019.

Table of Contents

On December 15, 2017, the Orrstown Defendants and SEPTA exchanged expert reports in opposition to and in support of class certification, respectively. On January 15, 2018, the parties exchanged expert rebuttal reports. SEPTA’s motion for class certification was due March 1, 2018, with the Orrstown Defendants’ opposition due April 2, 2018, and SEPTA’s reply due April 23, 2018.

On February 9, 2018, SEPTA filed a Status Report and Request for a Telephonic Status Conference asking the Court to convene a conference to discuss the status of discovery in the case and possible revisions to the case schedule. On February 12, 2018, the Orrstown Defendants filed their status report to provide the Court with a summary of document discovery in the case to date. On February 27, 2018, SEPTA filed an unopposed motion for a continuance of the existing case deadlines pending a status conference with the Court or the issuance of a revised case schedule. On February 28, 2018, the Court issued an Order continuing all case management deadlines until further order of the Court.

On March 27, 2018, the Court held a telephonic status conference with the parties to discuss outstanding discovery issues and case deadlines. On May 2, 2018, the parties filed a joint status report. On May 10, 2018, the Court held a follow-up telephonic status conference at which the parties reported on the progress of discovery to date. Party and non-party document discovery in the case has continued. To date, SEPTA has taken a few non-party depositions.

On August 9, 2018, SEPTA filed a motion to compel the production of Confidential Supervisory Information (CSI) of non-parties the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (FRB) and the Pennsylvania Department of Banking and Securities, in the possession of Orrstown and third parties. On August 23, 2018, the Orrstown Defendants filed a response to the motion to compel. On August 30, 2018, the FRB filed an unopposed motion to intervene in the Action for the purpose of opposing SEPTA’s motion to compel, and on September 27, 2018, the FRB filed its brief in opposition to SEPTA’s motion. On October 11, 2018, SEPTA filed its reply brief in support of its motion to compel. On February 12, 2019, the Court denied SEPTA’s motion to compel the production of CSI on the ground that SEPTA had failed to exhaust its administrative remedies.

On April 11, 2019, SEPTA filed a motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. The proposed third amended complaint seeks to reassert the Securities Act claims that the Court dismissed as to all defendants on December 7, 2016, when the Court granted in part and denied in part defendants’ motions to dismiss SEPTA’s second amended complaint. The proposed third amended complaint also seeks to reassert the Exchange Act claims against those defendants that the Court dismissed from the case on December 7, 2016. Defendants’ briefs in opposition to SEPTA’s motion for leave to file a third amended complaint were filed on April 25, 2019. SEPTA filed a reply brief in further support of its motion for leave to file a third amended complaint on May 9, 2019. That motion is pending.

On June 13, 2019, Orrstown filed a motion for protective order to stay discovery pending resolution of SEPTA’s motion for leave to file a third amended complaint. On June 19, 2019, former defendants Smith Elliott Kearns & Company, LLC and the underwriters joined in Orrstown’s motion for protective order. On June 25, 2019, SEPTA filed its opposition to Orrstown’s motion. On July 9, 2019, Orrstown filed a reply brief in further support of its motion. On July 17, 2019, the Court entered an Order partially granting Orrstown’s motion for protective order, ruling that all deposition discovery in the case is stayed pending a decision on SEPTA’s motion for leave to file a third amended complaint.

The Company believes that the allegations of SEPTA’s second amended complaint, and the allegations of the proposed third amended complaint, are without merit and intends to defend itself vigorously against those claims. It is not possible at this time to estimate reasonably possible losses, or even a range of reasonably possible losses, in connection with the litigation.

Table of Contents

See the Glossary of Defined Terms at the beginning of this Report for terms used throughout this Form 10-Q.

Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

Overview

The Company, headquartered in Shippensburg, Pennsylvania, is a one-bank holding company that has elected status as a financial holding company. The consolidated financial information presented herein reflects the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Bank and Wheatland. At June 30, 2019, the Company had total assets of $2,399,508,000, total liabilities of $2,179,640,000 and total shareholders’ equity of $219,868,000.

Caution About Forward-Looking Statements

Certain statements appearing herein, which are not historical in nature, are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. In addition, we may make other written and oral communications, from time to time, that contain such statements. Such forward-looking statements refer to a future period or periods, reflecting our current beliefs as to likely future developments, and use words like “may,” “will,” “expect,” “estimate,” “anticipate” or similar terms. Forward-looking statements are statements that include projections, predictions, expectations, or beliefs about events or results or otherwise are not statements of historical facts, including, but not limited to, statements related to new business development, new loan opportunities, growth in the balance sheet and fee based revenue lines of business, merger and acquisition activity, reducing risk assets, and mitigating losses in the future. Actual results and trends could differ materially from those set forth in such statements and there can be no assurances that we will achieve the desired level of new business development and new loans, growth in the balance sheet and fee based revenue lines of business, successful merger and acquisition activity, continue to reduce risk assets or mitigate losses in the future. Factors that could cause actual results to differ from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, the following: ineffectiveness of the Company’s business strategy due to changes in current or future market conditions; the effects of competition, including industry consolidation and development of competing financial products and services; difficulty integrating the Company's strategic acquisitions; the inability to fully achieve expected savings, efficiencies or synergies from mergers and acquisitions, or taking longer than estimated for such savings, efficiencies and synergies to be realized; changes in laws and regulations; interest rate movements; changes in credit quality; inability to raise capital, if necessary, under favorable conditions; volatilities in the securities markets; deteriorating economic conditions; expenses associated with pending litigation and legal proceedings; and other risks and uncertainties, including those detailed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, and our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q under the sections titled “Risk Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and in other filings made with the SEC. The statements are valid only as of the date hereof and we disclaim any obligation to update this information.

The following is a discussion of our consolidated financial condition at June 30, 2019 and results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. Throughout this discussion, the yield on earning assets is stated on a fully taxable-equivalent basis and balances represent average daily balances unless otherwise stated. The discussion and analysis should be read in conjunction with our unaudited consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes presented elsewhere in this report. Certain prior period amounts, presented in this discussion and analysis, may have been reclassified to conform to current period classifications.

Critical Accounting Estimates

The Company’s accounting and reporting policies are in accordance with GAAP and follow accounting and reporting guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities and general practices within the financial services industry in which it operates. Our financial position and results of operations are affected by management's application of accounting policies, including estimates, and assumptions and judgments that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. These estimates, assumptions, and judgments are based on information available as of the balance sheet date and through the date the financial statements are filed with the SEC. Different assumptions in the application of these policies could result in material changes in the consolidated financial position and/or consolidated results of operations and related disclosures. The more critical accounting estimates include accounting for credit losses and valuation methodologies. Accordingly, these critical accounting estimates are discussed in detail in "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Significant accounting policies and any changes in accounting principles and effects of new accounting pronouncements are discussed in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part II, Item 8, "Financial Statements and Supplementary Data," in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Additional disclosures regarding the effects of new accounting pronouncements are included in this report in Note 1, Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, "Financial Information."

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Quarter ended June 30, 2019 compared with quarter ended June 30, 2018

Summary

Net income totaled $2,687,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared with net income of $4,012,000 for the same period in 2018. Diluted EPS for the three months ended June 30, 2019 totaled $0.26, compared with $0.48 for the three months ended June 30, 2018. Net interest income positively influenced results of operations, and totaled $18,432,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019, a 49.21% increase compared with 2018. Noninterest income, excluding investment securities gains, totaled $5,815,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and $5,459,000 for 2018. Investment securities gains totaled $2,064,000 in the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared with $46,000 for the same period in 2018. Noninterest expenses totaled $23,314,000 and $13,272,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. Noninterest expenses in 2019 included merger related expenses totaling $6,860,000 associated with the Company's ongoing growth strategy.

The comparability of operating results for 2019 with 2018 have generally been impacted by the Mercersburg acquisition, completed on October 1, 2018, and the Hamilton acquisition, completed on May 1, 2019.

Net Interest Income

Net interest income increased $6,079,000, from $12,353,000 to $18,432,000, for the three months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the same period in 2018. Interest and fees income on loans increased $7,822,000, from $11,731,000 to $19,553,000, securities interest income increased $764,000, from $3,547,000 to $4,311,000, and total interest expense increased $2,964,000 from $2,971,000 to $5,935,000, in comparing the three months ended June 30, 2019 with 2018.

Table of Contents

The following table presents net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 on a taxable-equivalent basis.


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2019										Three Months Ended June 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balance		Taxable- Equivalent Interest		Taxable- Equivalent Rate		Average Balance		Taxable- Equivalent Interest		Taxable- Equivalent Rate
Assets
Federal funds sold & interest-bearing bank balances	$	84,843	$	503	2.38	%	$	9,189	$	46	2.01	%


Securities	496,803		4,479		3.62		470,993		3,815		3.25


Loans	1,497,445		19,677		5.27		1,055,562		11,825		4.49
Total interest-earning assets	2,079,091		24,659		4.76		1,535,744		15,686		4.10


Other assets	175,566						108,087

Total	$	2,254,657					$	1,643,831
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	922,612	2,040		0.89		$	741,161	$	1,006	0.54
Savings deposits	146,063		81		0.22		99,407		39		0.16
Time deposits	575,660		2,749		1.92		300,576		1,116		1.49
Short-term borrowings	9,594		34		1.41		87,463		402		1.84
Long-term debt	97,161		532		2.19		83,686		408		1.96
Subordinated notes	31,819		499		6.28		0		0		0.00
Total interest-bearing liabilities	1,782,909		5,935		1.34		1,312,293		2,971		0.91
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	235,046						172,813
Other	31,692						16,408
Total Liabilities	2,049,647						1,501,514
Shareholders’ Equity	205,010						142,317
Total	$	2,254,657					$	1,643,831
Taxable-equivalent net interest income /net interest spread			18,724		3.42	%			12,715		3.19	%
Taxable-equivalent net interest margin					3.61	%					3.32	%
Taxable-equivalent adjustment			(292)						(362)
Net interest income			$	18,432					$	12,353

Table notes: (1) Yields and interest income on tax-exempt assets have been computed on a taxable-equivalent basis assuming a 21% tax rate.

(2) For yield calculation purposes, nonaccruing loans are included in the average loan balance.

For the three months ended June 30, 2019, taxable-equivalent basis net interest income increased $6,009,000 from 2018. The increase reflected increased average interest-earning assets balances at increased market interest rates, partially offset by a higher average balance of interest-bearing liabilities at higher interest rates.

Taxable-equivalent interest income earned on loans increased $7,852,000 year-over-year. The $441,883,000 increase in average loan balance year-over-year includes approximately $350,150,000 in loans acquired in the Mercersburg and Hamilton transactions, as well as continued growth in legacy and newer markets through sales efforts with additional loan officers. Increases in prime lending rates between June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2019, contributed to the 78 basis point increase in yield, but a flattened yield curve partially offset the benefit of the rate increases. Accretion of purchase accounting adjustments in connection with the Mercersburg and Hamilton acquisitions increased second quarter 2019 interest income by $1,385,000. Interest income included $715,000 related to the payoff of purchased credit impaired loans.

Taxable-equivalent securities interest income increased $664,000 year-over-year, with the average balance of securities increasing $25,810,000 from June 30, 2018 to June 30, 2019, and the taxable equivalent yield increasing from 3.25% to 3.62%. The 37 basis point increase in the yield on securities year-over-year in taxable-equivalent interest income on securities reflected the increased interest rate environment and certain repositioning within the portfolio under the Company's asset/liability management strategies.

Table of Contents

Interest expense on deposits and borrowings increased $2,964,000 year-over-year, with the average balance of interest-bearing deposits increasing $503,191,000 and the average balance of total borrowings decreasing $32,575,000. In addition to the impact of the noted increased interest rate environment on interest expense, the Company issued $32,500,000 of 6.0% subordinated notes in December 2018. Also, during 2019, the Company has experienced a gradual repricing of term and non-maturity deposits.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses totaled $200,000 in the second quarter of both 2019 and 2018. The Company's organic loan portfolio growth, taking into account historical charge-off statistics and generally stable economic and market conditions for the last several years, were key factors included in the quantitative and qualitative considerations used by management in the determination of the provision expense required to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2019.

Additional information is included in the "Credit Risk Management" section herein.

Noninterest Income

The following table compares noninterest income for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						$ Change		% Change
(Dollars in thousands)	2019		2018		2019-2018		2019-2018
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	1,680	$	1,463	$	217	14.8	%
Other service charges, commissions and fees	346		689		(343)		(49.8)	%
Trust and investment management income	1,749		1,701		48		2.8	%
Brokerage income	672		501		171		34.1	%
Mortgage banking activities	652		679		(27)		(4.0)	%
Income from life insurance	684		291		393		135.1	%
Other income	32		135		(103)		(76.3)	%
Subtotal before securities gains	5,815		5,459		356		6.5	%
Investment securities gains	2,064		46		2,018		nm*
Total noninterest income	$	7,879	$	5,505	$	2,374	43.1	%
nm*: not meaningful

The following factors contributed to the more significant changes in noninterest income between the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

•Other service charges, commissions and fees included increased loan transaction fees in 2018.

•Income for trust and investment management income and brokerage income included the effect of increased revenue from additional advisors and increased estate fees in 2019.

•Mortgage banking income decreased in the year-over-year comparison. Loans sold in the second quarter of 2019 totaled $24,400,000 compared with $25,100,000 in second quarter of 2018.

•Income from life insurance included death benefit proceeds totaling $255,000 in 2019, with the remainder of the increase in 2019 attributable to additional life insurance policies acquired in the Mercersburg and Hamilton acquisitions.

•Other line items within noninterest income showed fluctuations between 2019 and 2018 attributable to normal business operations and the effect of the acquisitions.

The Company recognized net investment securities gains in 2019 and 2018 as opportunities became available to reposition part of the investment portfolio under asset/liability management strategies or to improve responsiveness of the portfolio to interest rate conditions, while also considering funding requirements of anticipated lending activity.

Table of Contents

Noninterest Expenses

The following table compares noninterest expenses for the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Three Months Ended June 30,						$ Change		% Change
(Dollars in thousands)	2019		2018		2019-2018		2019-2018
Salaries and employee benefits	$	8,922	$	7,855	$	1,067	13.6	%
Occupancy	1,066		679		387		57.0	%
Furniture and equipment	1,140		1,068		72		6.7	%
Data processing	1,058		595		463		77.8	%
Telephone and communication	202		165		37		22.4	%
Automated teller machine and interchange fees	238		190		48		25.3	%
Advertising and bank promotions	548		237		311		131.2	%
FDIC insurance	221		172		49		28.5	%
Legal	120		83		37		44.6	%
Other professional services	587		476		111		23.3	%
Directors' compensation	261		205		56		27.3	%

Real estate owned	12		53		(41)		(77.4)	%
Taxes other than income	314		251		63		25.1	%
Intangible asset amortization	402		24		378		nm*

Merger related	6,860		154		6,706		nm*

Other operating expenses	1,363		1,065		298		28.0	%
Total noninterest expenses	$	23,314	$	13,272	$	10,042	75.7	%
nm*: not meaningful

The following factors contributed to the more significant changes in noninterest expenses between the three months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

•Expanded operations with the addition of employees and branches from the Mercersburg acquisition in October 2018 and the Hamilton acquisition in May 2019; two branches opened in the fourth quarter of 2018 and two opened in the first quarter of 2019 in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania; and additional support personnel for the Company's ongoing expansion efforts all contributed to increases in salaries and employee benefits, occupancy costs, furniture and equipment, and data processing costs year-over-year, as well as the timing of advertising and bank promotions expenses incurred.

•Salaries and employee benefits principally reflected employees added in the acquisitions and for additional employees for the Company's new branches. In addition, the increase included the impact of our overall expansion efforts, annual merit increases, and incremental expense for additional share-based compensation awards granted in 2019, net of the benefit of forfeitures. In 2019, overall costs associated with the Company's self-insured group health plan were higher than in 2018 due to an increased number of employees and fluctuations in claims experience.

•Occupancy, furniture and equipment costs reflected Mercersburg and Hamilton branches acquired, and the Company's expanded presence in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.

•The Company incurred merger related expenses in the second quarter of 2019, principally data processing contract termination costs, employee contract termination costs and legal and consulting fees for the Hamilton acquisition.

•Other line items within noninterest expenses showed fluctuations between 2019 and 2018 attributable to normal business operations and the impact of the acquisitions.

Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense totaled $110,000, an effective tax rate of 3.9%, for the three months ended June 30, 2019, compared with $374,000, an effective tax rate of 8.5%, for the three months ended June 30, 2018. The Company’s effective tax rate is significantly less than the 21% federal statutory rate, principally due to tax-free income, which includes interest income on tax-free loans and securities and income from life insurance policies, federal income tax credits, and the impact of non-tax deductible expenses, including certain merger related expenses. In the second quarter of 2019, we recorded a tax benefit of approximately $334,000, related to an increase in its deferred state income tax asset for the effect of the state tax rate change resulting from the Hamilton acquisition. This tax benefit had the effect of lowering the effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2019 from approximately 15.9% to 3.9%.

Six months ended June 30, 2019 compared with six months ended June 30, 2018

Summary

Net income totaled $5,789,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared with net income of $7,637,000 for the same period in 2018. Diluted EPS for the six months ended June 30, 2019 totaled $0.58, compared with $0.92 for the six months ended June 30, 2018. Net interest income positively influenced results of operations, and totaled $33,121,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, a $9,084,000 increase compared with 2018. Noninterest income, excluding investment securities gains, totaled $10,703,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared with $10,345,000 in 2018. Investment securities gains totaled $2,403,000 in the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared with $862,000 for the same period in 2018. Noninterest expenses totaled $39,496,000 and $26,341,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018. Noninterest expenses in 2019 included merger related expenses totaling $7,505,000 associated with the Company's ongoing growth strategy, increased salaries and occupancy expenses, and the write-off of an insurance claim receivable totaling $615,000 resulting from an insurer's denial of a claim from a cyber security incident reported in 2018.

Table of Contents

Net Interest Income

Net interest income increased $9,084,000, from $24,037,000 to $33,121,000, for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared with the same period in 2018. Interest and fees income on loans increased $11,825,000, from $22,787,000 to $34,612,000, securities interest income increased $1,934,000, from $6,711,000 to $8,645,000, and total interest expense increased $5,250,000 from $5,562,000 to $10,812,000, in comparing the six months ended June 30, 2019 with 2018.

The following table presents net interest income, net interest spread and net interest margin for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 on a taxable-equivalent basis.


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2019										Six Months Ended June 30, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)	Average Balance		Taxable- Equivalent Interest		Taxable- Equivalent Rate		Average Balance		Taxable- Equivalent Interest		Taxable- Equivalent Rate
Assets
Federal funds sold & interest-bearing bank balances	$	57,130	$	676	2.39	%	$	11,717	$	101	1.74	%


Securities	498,271		9,037		3.66		459,892		7,210		3.16


Loans	1,378,213		34,857		5.10		1,043,258		22,967		4.44
Total interest-earning assets	1,933,614		44,570		4.65		1,514,867		30,278		4.03


Other assets	156,786						105,964

Total	$	2,090,400					$	1,620,831
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
Interest-bearing demand deposits	$	884,065	3,868		0.88		$	729,362	1,814		0.50
Savings deposits	130,276		125		0.19		98,400		77		0.16
Time deposits	489,855		4,571		1.88		291,257		2,094		1.45
Short-term borrowings	25,769		277		2.17		93,584		765		1.65
Long-term debt	92,644		975		2.12		83,731		812		1.96
Subordinated notes	31,852		996		6.30		0		0		0.00
Total interest-bearing liabilities	1,654,461		10,812		1.32		1,296,334		5,562		0.87
Noninterest-bearing demand deposits	218,796						166,440
Other	27,523						16,053
Total Liabilities	1,900,780						1,478,827
Shareholders’ Equity	189,620						142,004
Total	$	2,090,400					$	1,620,831
Taxable-equivalent net interest income /net interest spread			33,758		3.33	%			24,716		3.16	%
Taxable-equivalent net interest margin					3.52	%					3.29	%
Taxable-equivalent adjustment			(637)						(679)
Net interest income			$	33,121					$	24,037

Table notes: (1) Yields and interest income on tax-exempt assets have been computed on a taxable-equivalent basis assuming a 21% tax rate.

(2) For yield calculation purposes, nonaccruing loans are included in the average loan balance.

For the six months ended June 30, 2019, taxable-equivalent basis net interest income increased $9,042,000 compared with 2018. The increase reflected increased interest-earning assets balances at increased market interest rates, partially offset by a higher average balance of interest-bearing liabilities at higher interest rates.

Taxable-equivalent interest income earned on loans increased $11,890,000 year-over-year. The $334,955,000 increase in average loan balance year-over-year includes approximately $240,250,000 in loans acquired in the Mercersburg and Hamilton transactions, as well as continued growth in legacy and newer markets through sales efforts with additional loan officers. Increases in prime lending rates between June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2018 contributed to the 66 basis point increase in yield, but a flattened yield curve partially offset the benefit of the rate increases. Accretion of purchase accounting adjustments in connection with the Mercersburg and Hamilton acquisitions increased first half 2019 interest income by $1,385,000. Interest income included $715,000 related to the payoff of purchased credit impaired loans.

Table of Contents

Taxable-equivalent securities interest income increased $1,827,000 year-over-year, with the average balance of securities increasing $38,379,000 from June 30, 2018 to June 30, 2019, and the taxable equivalent yield increasing from 3.16% to 3.66%. The 50 basis point increase in the yield on securities year-over-year in taxable-equivalent interest income on securities reflected the increased interest rate environment and certain repositioning within the portfolio under the Company's asset/liability management strategies.

Interest expense on deposits and borrowings increased $5,250,000 year-over-year, with the average balance of interest-bearing deposits increasing $385,177,000 and the average balance of total borrowings decreasing $27,050,000. In addition to the impact of the noted increased interest rate environment on interest expense, the Company issued $32,500,000 of 6.0% subordinated notes in December 2018. Additionally, the Company has experienced a gradual repricing of term and non-maturity deposits during the first six months of 2019.

Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses totaled $600,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019 compared with $400,000 for the same period in 2018. Net loan charge-offs experienced in the first quarter of 2019 and the Company's organic loan portfolio growth, taking into account historical charge-off statistics and generally stable economic and market conditions for the last several years, were key factors included in the quantitative and qualitative considerations used by management in the determination of the provision expense required to maintain an adequate allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2019.

Additional information is included in the "Credit Risk Management" section herein.

Noninterest Income

The following table compares noninterest income for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Six Months Ended June 30,						$ Change		% Change
(Dollars in thousands)	2019		2018		2019-2018		2019-2018
Service charges on deposit accounts	$	3,169	$	2,881	$	288	10.0	%
Other service charges, commissions and fees	587		938		(351)		(37.4)	%
Trust and investment management income	3,507		3,369		138		4.1	%
Brokerage income	1,150		1,059		91		8.6	%
Mortgage banking activities	1,120		1,314		(194)		(14.8)	%
Income from life insurance	1,026		568		458		80.6	%

Other income	144		216		(72)		(33.3)	%
Subtotal before securities gains	10,703		10,345		358		3.5	%
Investment securities gains	2,403		862		1,541		178.8	%
Total noninterest income	$	13,106	$	11,207	$	1,899	16.9	%
nm*: not meaningful

Table of Contents

The following factors contributed to the more significant changes in noninterest income between the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

•Other service charges, commissions and fees included increased loan transaction fees in 2018.

•Income for trust and investment management income and brokerage income reflected fluctuations in customer volumes and market conditions, as well as the effect of increased revenue from additional advisors and increased estate fees in 2019.

•Mortgage banking income decreased in the year-over-year comparison. Loans sold in the first half of 2019 totaled $39,600,000 compared with $45,600,000 in 2018.

•Income from life insurance included death benefit proceeds in the second quarter of 2019 totaling $255,000, with the remainder of the increase in 2019 attributable to additional life insurance policies acquired in the Mercersburg and Hamilton transactions.

•Other line items within noninterest income showed fluctuations between 2019 and 2018 attributable to normal business operations and the effect of the acquisitions.

Noninterest Expenses

The following table compares noninterest expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Six Months Ended June 30,						$ Change		% Change
(Dollars in thousands)	2019		2018		2019-2018		2019-2018
Salaries and employee benefits	$	17,599	$	15,877	$	1,722	10.8	%
Occupancy	2,067		1,477		590		39.9	%
Furniture and equipment	2,163		1,987		176		8.9	%
Data processing	1,828		1,214		614		50.6	%
Telephone and communication	414		361		53		14.7	%
Automated teller machine and interchange fees	474		361		113		31.3	%
Advertising and bank promotions	1,069		619		450		72.7	%
FDIC insurance	406		338		68		20.1	%
Legal	173		149		24		16.1	%
Other professional services	1,091		779		312		40.1	%
Directors' compensation	497		456		41		9.0	%

Real estate owned	14		78		(64)		(82.1)	%
Taxes other than income	620		502		118		23.5	%
Intangible asset amortization	610		48		562		nm*

Merger related	7,505		154		7,351		nm*
Insurance claim receivable write off	615		0		615		nm*
Other operating expenses	2,351		1,941		410		21.1	%
Total noninterest expenses	$	39,496	$	26,341	$	13,155	49.9	%
nm*: not meaningful

The following factors contributed to the more significant changes in noninterest expenses between the six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.

•Expanded operations with the addition of employees and branches from the Mercersburg acquisition in October, 2018, and the Hamilton merger in May, 2019; two branches opened in the fourth quarter of 2018 and two opened in the first quarter of 2019 in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania; and additional support personnel for the Company's ongoing expansion efforts all contributed to increases in salaries and employee benefits, occupancy costs, furniture and equipment, and data processing costs year-over-year, as well as the timing of advertising and bank promotions expenses incurred.

Table of Contents

•Occupancy, furniture and equipment costs reflected Mercersburg and Hamilton branches acquired, and the Company's expanded presence in Lancaster County, Pennsylvania.

•The Company incurred merger related expenses principally in the second quarter of 2019, for data processing contract termination costs, employee contract termination costs and legal and consulting fees for the Hamilton acquisition. We also incurred system conversion expenses for the Mercersburg acquisition in the first quarter of 2019.

•As previously reported, in the first quarter of 2019 we incurred a $615,000 expense to write off an insurance claim receivable from a 2018 cyber security incident.

•Other line items within noninterest expenses showed fluctuations between 2019 and 2018 attributable to normal business operations and the impact of acquisitions.

Income Tax Expense

Income tax expense totaled $342,000, an effective tax rate of 5.6%, for the six months ended June 30, 2019, compared with $866,000, an effective tax rate of 10.2%, for the six months ended June 30, 2018. The Company’s effective tax rate is significantly less than the 21% federal statutory rate, principally due to tax-free income, which includes interest income on tax-free loans and securities and income from life insurance policies, federal income tax credits, and the impact of non-tax deductible expenses, including merger related expenses. The Company recorded a tax benefit of $185,000 in the first quarter of 2019, related to a favorable tax law clarification concerning the treatment of life insurance assets of an acquired entity. In the second quarter of 2019, we recorded a tax benefit of $334,000, related to an increase in our deferred state income tax asset for the effect of the state tax rate change resulting from the Hamilton acquisition. These tax benefit items had the effect of lowering the effective tax rate for the six months ended June 30, 2019, from approximately 14.0% to 5.6%.

FINANCIAL CONDITION

Management devotes substantial time to overseeing the investment of funds in loans and securities and the formulation of policies directed toward the profitability and management of the risks associated with these investments.

AFS Securities

The Company utilizes securities available for sale to manage interest rate risk, to enhance income through interest and dividend income, to provide liquidity and to provide collateral for certain deposits and borrowings. At June 30, 2019, AFS securities totaled $496,930,000, an increase of $31,086,000, from the $465,844,000 balance at December 31, 2018.

In the six months ended June 30, 2019, the Company realized net gains totaling $2,403,000 from sales of investments, as it repositioned parts of its portfolio in response to market and interest rate opportunities under its asset/liability management strategies. Sales of investments in states and political subdivisions were the principal driver of the realized net gains. Sale proceeds totaling $174,335,000 were principally redeployed in investments in asset-backed securities.

In July 2019, the Company sold an additional $18,000,000 of principally states and political subdivisions securities at a net gain of approximately $2,300,000.

Loan Portfolio

The Company offers a variety of products to meet the credit needs of its borrowers, principally commercial real estate loans, commercial and industrial loans, and retail loans consisting of loans secured by residential properties, and to a lesser extent, installment loans. No loans are extended to non-domestic borrowers or governments.

The risks associated with lending activities differ among loan classes and are subject to the impact of changes in interest rates, market conditions of collateral securing the loans and general economic conditions. Any of these factors may adversely impact a borrower’s ability to repay loans, and also impact the associated collateral. See Note 4, Loans Receivable and Allowance for Loan Losses, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, "Financial Information," for a description of the Company’s loan classes and differing levels of associated credit risk.

Table of Contents

The following table presents the loan portfolio, excluding residential LHFS, by segment and class at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	170,272	$	129,650
Non-owner occupied	298,989		252,794
Multi-family	93,342		78,933
Non-owner occupied residential	121,364		100,367
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	12,801		7,385
Commercial and land development	57,027		42,051
Commercial and industrial	219,551		160,964
Municipal	48,358		50,982
Residential mortgage:
First lien	363,946		235,296
Home equity - term	15,989		12,208
Home equity - lines of credit	157,645		143,616
Installment and other loans	42,386		33,411
	$	1,601,670	$	1,247,657

The above totals include $453,280,000 and $135,009,000 of acquired loans at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Total loans grew $354,013,000 from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Balances at June 30, 2019, include approximately $335,000,000 acquired from Hamilton. The Hamilton acquisition increased the Company's loan portfolio principally in the residential mortgage - first lien, commercial real estate - owner occupied and non-owner occupied, and commercial and industrial classes.

Competition for new business opportunities remains strong, which has contributed to a reduced rate of organic loan growth in 2019 compared with prior years and may temper loan growth in future quarters.

Asset Quality

Risk Elements

The Company’s loan portfolio is subject to varying degrees of credit risk. Credit risk is managed through our underwriting standards, on-going credit reviews, and monitoring of asset quality measures. Additionally, loan portfolio diversification, which limits exposure to a single industry or borrower, and collateral requirements also mitigate our risk of credit loss.

The loan portfolio consists principally of loans to borrowers in south central Pennsylvania and the greater Baltimore, Maryland region. As the majority of loans are concentrated in these geographic regions, a substantial portion of the borrowers' ability to honor their obligations may be affected by the level of economic activity in the market areas.

Nonperforming assets include nonaccrual loans and foreclosed real estate. In addition, restructured loans still accruing and loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing are also deemed to be risk assets. For all loan classes, generally the accrual of interest income ceases when principal or interest is past due 90 days or more and collateral is inadequate to cover principal and interest or immediately if, in the opinion of management, full collection is unlikely. Interest will continue to accrue on loans past due 90 days or more if the collateral is adequate to cover principal and interest, and the loan is in the process of collection. Interest accrued, but not collected, as of the date of placement on nonaccrual status, is generally reversed and charged against interest income, unless fully collateralized. Subsequent payments received are either applied to the outstanding principal balance or recorded as interest income, depending on management’s assessment of the ultimate collectability of principal. Loans are returned to accrual status, for all loan classes, when all the principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current, the loans have performed in accordance with the contractual terms of the note for a reasonable period of time, generally six months, and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and interest is reasonably assured. Past due status is based on contract terms of the loan.

Loans, the terms of which are modified, are classified as TDRs if a concession was granted for legal or economic reasons related to a borrower’s financial difficulties. Concessions granted under a TDR typically involve a temporary deferral of scheduled loan payments, an extension of a loan’s stated maturity date, temporary reduction in interest rates, or below market

Table of Contents

rates. If a modification occurs while the loan is on accruing status, it will continue to accrue interest under the modified terms. Nonaccrual TDRs are restored to accrual status if scheduled principal and interest payments, under the modified terms, are current for six months after modification, and the borrower continues to demonstrate its ability to meet the modified terms. TDRs are evaluated individually for impairment if they have been restructured during the most recent calendar year, or if they are not performing according to their modified terms.

The following table presents the Company’s risk elements, including the aggregate balances of nonaccrual loans, restructured loans still accruing, loans past due 90 days or more, and OREO as of June 30, 2019, December 31, 2018 and June 30, 2018. Relevant asset quality ratios are also presented.


(Dollars in thousands)	June 30, 2019			December 31, 2018			June 30, 2018
Nonaccrual loans (cash basis)	$	4,387		$	5,165		$	4,998
OREO	735			130			395
Total nonperforming assets	5,122			5,295			5,393
Restructured loans still accruing	1,104			1,132			1,156
Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing	1,661			57			0
Total nonperforming and other risk assets	$	7,887		$	6,484		$	6,549
Loans 30-89 days past due	$	5,428		$	5,186		$	1,857
Asset quality ratios:
Total nonperforming loans to total loans	0.27		%	0.41		%	0.47		%
Total nonperforming assets to total assets	0.21		%	0.27		%	0.33		%
Total nonperforming assets to total loans and OREO	0.32		%	0.42		%	0.51		%
Total risk assets to total loans and OREO	0.49		%	0.52		%	0.62		%
Total risk assets to total assets	0.33		%	0.34		%	0.40		%
ALL to total loans	0.90		%	1.12		%	1.26		%
ALL to nonperforming loans	329.61		%	271.33		%	268.85		%
ALL to nonperforming loans and restructured loans still accruing	263.34		%	222.55		%	218.35		%

Total nonperforming and other risk assets increased $1,403,000, or 21.6%, from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019 and increased $1,338,000, or 20.4%, from June 30, 2018. The principal driver for the increase in nonperforming and risk assets is the increase in loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing, all of which were acquired in the mergers with Mercersburg and Hamilton.

The following table presents detail of impaired loans at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.


	June 30, 2019										December 31, 2018
(Dollars in thousands)	Nonaccrual Loans		Restructured Loans Still Accruing		Total		Nonaccrual Loans		Restructured Loans Still Accruing		Total
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	1,706	$	31	$	1,737	$	1,841	$	39	$	1,880

Multi-family	114		0		114		131		0		131
Non-owner occupied residential	270		0		270		309		0		309



Commercial and industrial	253		0		253		286		0		286
Residential mortgage:
First lien	1,340		1,052		2,392		1,808		1,069		2,877
Home equity - term	12		0		12		16		0		16
Home equity - lines of credit	684		21		705		774		24		798
Installment and other loans	8		0		8		0		0		0
	$	4,387	$	1,104	$	5,491	$	5,165	$	1,132	$	6,297

Table of Contents

The following table presents our exposure to borrowers with impaired loans, partial charge-offs taken to date and specific reserves established on the borrowing relationships at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018. Of the relationships deemed to be impaired at June 30, 2019, none had a recorded balance in excess of $1,000,000 and 63, or 74.0%, of total impaired loans, had recorded balances of less than $250,000.


(Dollars in thousands)	# of Relationships	Recorded Investment		Partial Charge-offs to Date		Specific Reserves
June 30, 2019

Relationships greater than $500,000 but less than $1,000,000	1	775		17		0
Relationships greater than $250,000 but less than $500,000	2	650		0		0
Relationships less than $250,000	63	4,066		856		37
	66	$	5,491	$	873	$	37
December 31, 2018

Relationships greater than $500,000 but less than $1,000,000	1	810		17		0
Relationships greater than $250,000 but less than $500,000	2	673		0		0
Relationships less than $250,000	64	4,814		873		38
	67	$	6,297	$	890	$	38

The Company takes partial charge-offs on collateral-dependent loans when carrying value exceeds estimated fair value, as determined by the most recent appraisal adjusted for current (within the quarter) conditions, less costs to dispose. Impairment reserves remain in place if updated appraisals are pending, and represent management’s estimate of potential loss.

Internal loan reviews are completed annually on all commercial relationships with a committed loan balance in excess of $500,000, which includes confirmation of risk rating by an independent credit officer. Credit Administration also reviews loans in excess of $1,000,000. In addition, all relationships greater than $250,000 rated Substandard, Doubtful or Loss are reviewed and corresponding risk ratings are reaffirmed by the Bank's Problem Loan Committee, with subsequent reporting to the ERM Committee.

In its individual loan impairment analysis, the Company determines the extent of any full or partial charge-offs that may be required, or any reserves that may be needed. The determination of the Company’s charge-offs or impairment reserve include an evaluation of the outstanding loan balance and the related collateral securing the credit. Through a combination of collateral securing the loans and partial charge-offs taken to date, the Company believes that it has adequately provided for the potential losses that it may incur on these relationships at June 30, 2019. However, over time, additional information may result in increased reserve allocations or, alternatively, it may be deemed that the reserve allocations exceed those that are needed.

The Company’s OREO totaled $735,000 at June 30, 2019 and consisted of two commercial and one residential properties. The increase in OREO from $130,000 at December 31, 2018 was the result of the addition of one commercial and one residential property. All properties are carried at the lower of cost or fair value, less costs to dispose.

At June 30, 2019, the Company believes the value of OREO represents the properties' fair values, but if the real estate market changes, additional expense may be recorded.

Credit Risk Management

Allowance for Loan Losses

The Company maintains the ALL at a level deemed adequate by management for probable incurred credit losses. The ALL is established and maintained through a provision for loan losses charged to earnings. Quarterly, management assesses the adequacy of the ALL using a defined methodology which considers specific credit evaluation of impaired loans, past loan loss historical experience and qualitative factors. Management addresses the requirements for loans individually identified as impaired, loans collectively evaluated for impairment, and other bank regulatory guidance in its assessment.

The ALL is evaluated based on review of the collectability of loans in light of historical experience; the nature and volume of the loan portfolio; adverse situations that may affect a borrower’s ability to repay; estimated value of any underlying collateral; and prevailing economic conditions. This evaluation is inherently subjective as it requires estimates that are susceptible to significant revision as more information becomes available. A description of the methodology for establishing the allowance and provision for loan losses and related procedures in establishing the appropriate level of reserve is included in Note 4, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, "Financial Information."

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the Company’s internal risk ratings at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018:


(Dollars in thousands)	Pass		Special Mention		Non-Impaired Substandard		Impaired - Substandard		Doubtful		PCI Loans		Total
June 30, 2019
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	158,247	$	1,366	$	878	$	1,737	$	0	$	8,044	$	170,272
Non-owner occupied	286,669		10,935		0		0		0		1,385		298,989
Multi-family	86,765		5,065		700		114		0		698		93,342
Non-owner occupied residential	114,607		2264		1,156		270		0		3,067		121,364
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	12,151		650		0		0		0		0		12,801
Commercial and land development	56,268		188		571		0		0		0		57,027
Commercial and industrial	198,699		9,523		6,946		253		0		4,130		219,551
Municipal	48,358		0		0		0		0		0		48,358
Residential mortgage:
First lien	351,523		0		0		2,392		0		10,031		363,946
Home equity - term	15,877		79		0		12		0		21		15,989
Home equity - lines of credit	156,731		187		22		705		0		0		157,645
Installment and other loans	42,089		0		0		8		0		289		42,386
	$	1,527,984	$	30,257	$	10,273	$	5,491	$	0	$	27,665	$	1,601,670
December 31, 2018
Commercial real estate:
Owner occupied	$	121,903	$	3,024	$	987	$	1,880	$	0	$	1,856	$	129,650
Non-owner occupied	242,136		10,008		0		0		0		650		252,794
Multi-family	71,482		5,886		717		131		0		717		78,933
Non-owner occupied residential	97,590		736		1,197		309		0		535		100,367
Acquisition and development:
1-4 family residential construction	7,385		0		0		0		0		0		7,385
Commercial and land development	41,251		25		583		0		0		192		42,051
Commercial and industrial	150,286		2,278		2,940		286		0		5,174		160,964
Municipal	50,982		0		0		0		0		0		50,982
Residential mortgage:
First lien	229,971		0		0		2,877		0		2,448		235,296
Home equity - term	12,170		0		0		16		0		22		12,208
Home equity - lines of credit	142,638		165		15		798		0		0		143,616
Installment and other loans	33,229		15		1		0		0		166		33,411
	$	1,201,023	$	22,137	$	6,440	$	6,297	$	0	$	11,760	$	1,247,657

Potential problem loans are defined as performing loans which have characteristics that cause management concern over the ability of the borrower to perform under present loan repayment terms and which may result in the reporting of these loans as nonperforming loans in the future. Generally, management feels that Substandard loans that are currently performing and not considered impaired result in some doubt as to the borrower’s ability to continue to perform under the terms of the loan, and

Table of Contents

represent potential problem loans. Additionally, the Special Mention classification is intended to be a temporary classification reflective of loans that have potential weaknesses that may, if not monitored or corrected, weaken the asset or inadequately protect the Company’s position at some future date. Special Mention loans represent an elevated risk, but their weakness does not yet justify a more severe, or classified, rating. These loans require inquiry by lenders on the cause of the potential weakness and, once analyzed, the loan classification may be downgraded to Substandard or, alternatively, could be upgraded to Pass.

The following table summarizes activity in the ALL for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 and 2018.


	Commercial																		Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate		Acquisition and Development		Commercial and Industrial		Municipal		Total		Residential Mortgage		Installment and Other		Total		Unallocated		Total
Three Months Ended
June 30, 2019
Balance, beginning of period	$	7,025	$	969	$	1,814	$	98	$	9,906	$	3,765	$	217	$	3,982	$	395	$	14,283
Provision for loan losses	(221)		39		325		(4)		139		(32)		40		8		53		200
Charge-offs	0		0		(47)		0		(47)		(25)		(51)		(76)		0		(123)
Recoveries	43		0		28		0		71		26		3		29		0		100
Balance, end of period	$	6,847	$	1,008	$	2,120	$	94	$	10,069	$	3,734	$	209	$	3,943	$	448	$	14,460
June 30, 2018
Balance, beginning of period	$	6,770	$	510	$	1,590	$	83	$	8,953	$	3,382	$	204	$	3,586	$	461	$	13,000
Provision for loan losses	(418)		208		8		(3)		(205)		237		44		281		124		200
Charge-offs	0		0		0		0		0		(86)		(47)		(133)		0		(133)
Recoveries	328		2		0		0		330		11		29		40		0		370
Balance, end of period	$	6,680	$	720	$	1,598	$	80	$	9,078	$	3,544	$	230	$	3,774	$	585	$	13,437
Six Months Ended
June 30, 2019
Balance, beginning of period	$	6,876	$	817	$	1,656	$	98	$	9,447	$	3,753	$	244	$	3,997	$	570	$	14,014
Provision for loan losses	(118)		189		484		(4)		551		157		14		171		(122)		600
Charge-offs	(25)		0		(90)		0		(115)		(271)		(71)		(342)		0		(457)
Recoveries	114		2		70		0		186		95		22		117		0		303
Balance, end of period	$	6,847	$	1,008	$	2,120	$	94	$	10,069	$	3,734	$	209	$	3,943	$	448	$	14,460
June 30, 2018
Balance, beginning of period	$	6,763	$	417	$	1,446	$	84	$	8,710	$	3,400	$	211	$	3,611	$	475	$	12,796
Provision for loan losses	(411)		300		152		(4)		37		202		51		253		110		400
Charge-offs	0		0		0		0		0		(86)		(118)		(204)		0		(204)
Recoveries	328		3		0		0		331		28		86		114		0		445
Balance, end of period	$	6,680	$	720	$	1,598	$	80	$	9,078	$	3,544	$	230	$	3,774	$	585	$	13,437

The ALL at June 30, 2019, increased $446,000 from December 31, 2018, reflecting the $600,000 provision for loan losses and net charge-offs during the quarter. Net charge-offs totaled $(23,000) and $(154,000) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 compared with net recoveries of $237,000 and $241,000 for the same periods in 2018. The ratio of annualized net charge-offs (recoveries) to average loans outstanding was 0.01% and 0.02% for the three and six months ended June 30, 2019 compared with (0.09)% and (0.05)% for 2018. Classified loans totaled $15,764,000 at June 30, 2019, or 1.0% of total loans outstanding, and increased from $12,737,000 at December 31, 2018, or 1.0% of loans outstanding. The asset quality ratios previously noted are indicative of the continued benefit the Company has received from favorable historical charge-off statistics and generally stable economic and market conditions for the last few years, even while the loan portfolio has been growing. Recent loan growth trends contributed to management's determination that a provision for loan losses was required to maintain an adequate ALL, with an ALL to total loans ratio of 0.90% at June 30, 2019. A principal factor impacting a comparison with the ALL to total loans ratio of 1.26% at June 30, 2018, was loans acquired in the Mercersburg and Hamilton transactions that were recorded at fair value, which incorporated a credit factor, and did not require an increase in the Company's ALL.

Despite generally favorable historical charge-off data and stable economic and market conditions, the growth the Company has experienced in its loan portfolio may result in the need for additional provisions for loan losses in future quarters.

Table of Contents

The following table summarizes the ending loan balances individually or collectively evaluated for impairment based on loan type, as well as the ALL allocation for each, at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, excluding PCI loans.


	Commercial																		Consumer
(Dollars in thousands)	Commercial Real Estate		Acquisition and Development		Commercial and Industrial		Municipal		Total		Residential Mortgage		Installment and Other		Total		Unallocated		Total
June 30, 2019
Loans allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,121	$	0	$	253	$	0	$	2,374	$	3,109	$	8	$	3,117	$	0	$	5,491
Collectively evaluated for impairment	681,846		69,828		219,298		48,358		1,019,330		534,471		42,378		576,849		0		1,596,179
	$	683,967	$	69,828	$	219,551	$	48,358	$	1,021,704	$	537,580	$	42,386	$	579,966	$	0	$	1,601,670
ALL allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	37	$	0	$	37	$	0	$	37
Collectively evaluated for impairment	6,847		1,008		2,120		94		10,069		3,697		209		3,906		448		14,423
	$	6,847	$	1,008	$	2,120	$	94	$	10,069	$	3,734	$	209	$	3,943	$	448	$	14,460
December 31, 2018
Loans allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	2,320	$	0	$	286	$	0	$	2,606	$	3,691	$	0	$	3,691	$	0	$	6,297
Collectively evaluated for impairment	559,424		49,436		160,678		50,982		820,520		387,429		33,411		420,840		0		1,241,360
	$	561,744	$	49,436	$	160,964	$	50,982	$	823,126	$	391,120	$	33,411	$	424,531	$	0	$	1,247,657
ALL allocated by:
Individually evaluated for impairment	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	0	$	38	$	0	$	38	$	0	$	38
Collectively evaluated for impairment	6,876		817		1,656		98		9,447		3,715		244		3,959		570		13,976
	$	6,876	$	817	$	1,656	$	98	$	9,447	$	3,753	$	244	$	3,997	$	570	$	14,014

In addition to the specific reserve allocations on impaired loans noted previously, 17 loans, with aggregate outstanding principal balances of $3,683,000, have had cumulative partial charge-offs to the ALL totaling $873,000 at June 30, 2019. As updated appraisals were received on collateral-dependent loans, partial charge-offs were taken to the extent the loans’ principal balance exceeded their fair value.

Management believes the allocation of the ALL between the various loan classes adequately reflects the probable incurred credit losses in each portfolio and is based on the methodology outlined in Note 4, Loans and Allowance for Loan Losses, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, "Financial Information." Management re-evaluates and makes enhancements to its reserve methodology to better reflect the risks inherent in the different segments of the portfolio, particularly in light of increased charge-offs, with noticeable differences between the different loan classes. Management believes these enhancements to the ALL methodology improve the accuracy of quantifying probable incurred credit losses inherent in the portfolio. Management charges actual loan losses to the reserve and bases the provision for loan losses on its overall analysis.

The unallocated portion of the ALL reflects estimated inherent losses within the portfolio that have not been detected, as well as the risk of error in the specific and general reserve allocation, other potential exposure in the loan portfolio, variances in management’s assessment of national and local economic conditions and other factors management believes appropriate at the time. The unallocated portion of the ALL totaled $448,000, or 3.1% of the ALL balance, at June 30, 2019 compared with $570,000, or 4.1% of the ALL balance at December 31, 2018. The Company monitors the unallocated portion of the ALL and, by policy, has determined it should not exceed 6% of the total reserve. Future negative provisions for loan losses may result if the unallocated portion was to increase, and management determined the reserves were not required for the anticipated risk in the portfolio.

Table of Contents

Management believes the Company’s ALL is adequate based on currently available information. Future adjustments to the ALL and enhancements to the methodology may be necessary due to changes in economic conditions, regulatory guidance, or management’s assumptions as to future delinquencies or loss rates.

Deposits

Deposits totaled $2,015,541,000 at June 30, 2019, an increase of $456,785,000, or 29.3%, from $1,558,756,000 at December 31, 2018.

Noninterest-bearing deposits increased $42,362,000, or 20.7%, from December 31, 2018 to June 30, 2019. Interest-bearing deposits totaled $1,768,336,000 at June 30, 2019, an increase of $414,423,000, or 30.6% from the $1,353,913,000 balance at December 31, 2018. The Hamilton acquisition contributed approximately 80% of the increase in noninterest-bearing deposits and approximately 85% of the increase in interest-bearing deposits.

The Company continues to increase both noninterest-bearing and interest-bearing deposit relationships from its enhanced cash management offerings as it increases its commercial relationships. Deposit growth in the first six months of 2019 was principally used to reduce total borrowings and to fund growth in the loan and investment portfolios.

Shareholders' Equity, Capital Adequacy and Regulatory Matters

Capital management in a regulated financial services industry must properly balance return on equity to its shareholders while maintaining sufficient levels of capital and related risk-based regulatory capital ratios to satisfy statutory regulatory requirements. The Company’s capital management strategies have been developed to provide attractive rates of returns to its shareholders, while maintaining a “well capitalized” position of regulatory strength.

Shareholders’ equity totaled $219,868,000 at June 30, 2019, and increased $46,435,000 or 26.8%, from $173,433,000 at December 31, 2018. The increase was attributable to growth in retained earnings totaling $5,789,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2019, net of dividends paid on common stock totaling $2,799,000, and improvement in net unrealized gains/losses in AOCI, net of taxes, totaling $6,380,000, and the issuance of the Company's common stock in connection with the acquisition of Hamilton totaling $36,622,000.

The Company routinely evaluates its capital levels in light of its risk profile to assess its capital needs. The Company and the Bank are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by federal and state banking agencies. The consolidated asset limit on small bank holding companies is $3,000,000,000 and a company with assets under that limit is not subject to the FRB consolidated capital rules, but may file reports that include capital amounts and ratios. The Company has elected to file those reports.

At June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the Bank was considered well capitalized under applicable banking regulations. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Prompt corrective action provisions are not applicable to bank holding companies, including financial holding companies.

Note 9, Shareholders' Equity and Regulatory Capital, to the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, "Financial Information," includes a table presenting capital amounts and ratios for the Company and the Bank at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

In addition to the minimum capital ratio requirement and minimum capital ratio to be well capitalized presented in the referenced table in Note 9, the Bank must maintain a capital conservation buffer as more fully described in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, Item 1 - Business, under the topic Basel III Capital Rules. At June 30, 2019, the Bank's capital conservation buffer, based on the most restrictive Total Capital to risk weighted assets capital ratio, was 5.0%, which is greater than the 2.50% requirement for 2019.

Table of Contents

Liquidity

The primary function of asset/liability management is to ensure adequate liquidity and manage the Company’s sensitivity to changing interest rates. Liquidity management involves the ability to meet the cash flow requirements of customers who may be either depositors wanting to withdraw funds or borrowers needing assurance that sufficient funds will be available to meet their credit needs. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, maturities and sales of investment securities, the sale of mortgage loans and borrowings from the FHLB of Pittsburgh. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of expected loan demand, expected deposit flows, yields available on interest-earning deposits and securities and the objectives of our asset/liability management policy.

Mergers and Acquisitions

See Note 2, Mergers and Acquisitions, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, "Financial Statements" in this Form 10-Q.

Supplemental Reporting of Non-GAAP Measures

As a result of acquisitions, the Company has intangible assets consisting of goodwill and core deposit and other intangible assets totaling $27,761,000 and $16,502,000 at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018.

Management believes providing certain “non-GAAP” financial information will assist investors in their understanding of the effect of acquisition activity on reported results, particularly to overcome comparability issues related to the influence of intangibles (principally goodwill) created in acquisitions.

Tangible book value per share and net interest margin excluding the impact of purchase accounting, as used by the Company in this supplemental reporting presentation, are determined by methods other than in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles ("GAAP"). While we believe this information is a useful supplement to GAAP based measures presented in this Form 10-Q, readers are cautioned that this non-GAAP disclosure has limitations as an analytical tool, should not be viewed as a substitute for financial measures determined in accordance with GAAP, and should not be considered in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results and financial condition as reported under GAAP, nor are such measures necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies. This supplemental presentation should not be construed as an inference that our future results will be unaffected by similar adjustments to be determined in accordance with GAAP.

The following table presents the computation of each non-GAAP based measure shown together with its most directly comparable GAAP based measure.


















(in thousands, except per share information)	June 30, 2019				December 31, 2018
Tangible Book Value per Common Share
Shareholders' equity	$	219,868			$	173,433
Goodwill and other intangible assets, net of related tax effect			26,052				15,698
Tangible common equity (non-GAAP)	$	193,816			$	157,735

Common shares outstanding	11,224				9,430

Book value per share (most directly comparable GAAP based measure)			$	19.59			$	18.39
Intangible assets per share	2.32				1.66
Tangible book value per share (non-GAAP)	$	17.27			$	16.73

Table of Contents


	At or For The Three Months Ended						At or For The Six Months Ended
	June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018		June 30, 2019		June 30, 2018























Net Interest Margin (excluding the impact of purchase accounting)
Net interest margin as reported	3.61	%	3.32	%	3.52	%	3.29	%
Adjustment for purchase accounting:
Total interest-earning assets (loans)	(0.30)	%	0.00	%	(0.19)	%	0.00	%
Net Interest Margin (excluding the impact of purchase accounting) (non-GAAP)	3.31	%	3.32	%	3.33	%	3.29	%

Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk

Market risk comprises exposure to interest rate risk, foreign currency exchange rate risk, commodity price risk, and other relevant market rate or price risks. In the banking industry, a major risk exposure is changing interest rates. The primary objective of monitoring our interest rate sensitivity, or risk, is to provide management the tools necessary to manage the balance sheet to minimize adverse changes in net interest income as a result of changes in the direction and level of interest rates. Federal Reserve Board monetary control efforts, the effects of deregulation, economic uncertainty and legislative changes have been significant factors affecting the task of managing interest rate sensitivity positions in recent years.

Interest Rate Risk

Interest rate risk is the exposure to fluctuations in the Company’s future earnings (earnings at risk) and value (value at risk) resulting from changes in interest rates. This exposure results from differences between the amounts of interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities that reprice within a specified time period as a result of scheduled maturities, scheduled and unscheduled repayments, the propensity of borrowers and depositors to react to changes in their economic interests, and loan contractual interest rate changes.

We attempt to manage the level of repricing and maturity mismatch through our asset/liability management process so that fluctuations in net interest income are maintained within policy limits across a range of market conditions, while satisfying liquidity and capital requirements. Management recognizes that a certain amount of interest rate risk is inherent, appropriate and necessary to ensure the Company’s profitability. Thus, the goal of interest rate risk management is to evaluate the amount of reward for taking risk and adjusting both the size and composition of the balance sheet relative to the level of reward available for taking risk.

Management endeavors to control the exposure to changes in interest rates by understanding, reviewing and making decisions based on its risk position. The Company primarily uses its securities portfolio, FHLB advances and brokered deposits to manage its interest rate risk position. Additionally, pricing, promotion and product development activities are directed in an effort to emphasize the loan and deposit term or repricing characteristics that best meet current interest rate risk objectives. At present, we do not use hedging instruments for risk management, but we do evaluate them and may use them in the future.

We use simulation analysis to assess earnings at risk and net present value analysis to assess value at risk. These methods allow management to regularly monitor both the direction and magnitude of our interest rate risk exposure. These analyses require numerous assumptions including, but not limited to, changes in balance sheet mix, prepayment rates on loans and securities, cash flows and repricing of all financial instruments, changes in volumes and pricing, future shapes of the yield curve, relationship of market interest rates to each other (basis risk), credit spread and deposit sensitivity. Assumptions are based on management’s best estimates but may not accurately reflect actual results under certain changes in interest rate due to the timing, magnitude and frequency of rate changes, changes in market conditions and strategies management may undertake to reduce the impact of any changes, particularly in a low interest rate environment, among other factors. However, the analyses are useful in quantifying risk and providing a relative gauge of our interest rate risk position over time.

Our asset/liability committee operates under management policies, approved by the Board of Directors, which define guidelines and limits on the level of risk. The committee meets regularly and reviews our interest rate risk position and monitors various liquidity ratios to ensure a satisfactory liquidity position. By utilizing our analyses, we can determine changes that may need to be made to the asset and liability mixes to mitigate the change in net interest income under various interest rate scenarios. Management continually evaluates the condition of the economy, the pattern of market interest rates and other economic data to inform the committee on the selection of investment securities. Regulatory authorities also monitor our interest rate risk position along with other liquidity ratios.

Table of Contents

Earnings at Risk

Simulation analysis evaluates the effect of upward and downward changes in market interest rates on future net interest income. The analysis involves changing the interest rates used in determining net interest income over the next twelve months. The resulting percentage change in net interest income in various rate scenarios is an indication of our short-term interest rate risk. The analysis assumes recent trends in new loan and deposit volumes will continue while the amount of investment securities remains constant. Additional assumptions are applied to modify volumes and pricing under the various rate scenarios.

The simulation analysis results are presented in the Earnings at Risk table below. At June 30, 2019, similar to at December 31, 2018, these results indicate the Company would be better positioned in a moderately rising rate environment than it would be if interest rates increased more substantially or decreased.

Value at Risk

Net present value analysis provides information on the risk inherent in the balance sheet that might not be taken into account in the simulation analysis due to the short time horizon used in that analysis. The net present value of the balance sheet incorporates the discounted present value of expected asset cash flows minus the discounted present value of expected liability cash flows. The analysis involves changing the interest rates used in determining the expected cash flows and in discounting the cash flows, assuming a point in time balance sheet with no management actions to actively manage the balance sheet for improved results. The resulting percentage change in net present value in various rate scenarios is an indication of the longer term repricing risk and options embedded in the balance sheet.

At June 30, 2019, similar to at December 31, 2018, these results indicate the Company would be better positioned in a rising interest rate environment than it would be if interest rates decreased.


Earnings at Risk								Value at Risk
	% Change in Net Interest Income							% Change in Market Value
Change in Market Interest Rates (basis points)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018		Change in Market Interest Rates (basis points)	June 30, 2019		December 31, 2018
(100)	(2.1)	%	(2.1)	%	(100)	(25.0)	%	(14.1)	%
100	1.1	%	(0.6)	%	100	13.0	%	6.1	%
200	0.7	%	(2.2)	%	200	19.0	%	7.1	%

Item 4. Controls and Procedures

Based on the evaluation required by Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(b) and 15d-15(b), the Company’s management, including the Principal Executive Officer and Interim Chief Accounting Officer, conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Securities Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e), at June 30, 2019. Based on that evaluation, the Principal Executive Officer and Interim Chief Accounting Officer concluded that the disclosure controls and procedures were effective at June 30, 2019. There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, internal control over financial reporting during the second quarter of 2019.

Table of Contents

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1 – Legal Proceedings

Information regarding legal proceedings is included in Note 13, Contingencies, to the Consolidated Financial Statements under Part I, Item 1, "Financial Statements" and incorporated herein by reference.

Item 1A – Risk Factors

Except as described below, there have been no material changes from the risk factors as disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018.

Certain risk factors related to mergers and acquisitions in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 referenced risks associated with the completion of the Company's merger with Hamilton. As noted elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, the merger with Hamilton was completed on May 1, 2019 and our market area now includes Anne Arundel, Baltimore, and Howard Counties, Maryland, as well as Baltimore City, Maryland.

The risk factor related to changes in our accounting policies or in accounting standards appearing in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018 referenced an adoption date in 2020 for ASU 2016-13, for changes in measurement of credit losses. As noted elsewhere in this Form 10-Q, the FASB has proposed a delay in the effective date of this ASU for smaller reporting companies until fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2022, with earlier adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the impact of the proposed delay for adoption of the update.

Item 2 – Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

No shares of the Company were repurchased from April 1, 2019 to June 30, 2019.

In September 2015, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a share repurchase program under which the Company may repurchase up to 5% of the Company's outstanding shares of common stock, or approximately 416,000 shares, in accordance with all applicable securities laws and regulations, including Rule 10b-18 of the Exchange Act. When and if appropriate, repurchases may be made in open market or privately negotiated transactions, depending on market conditions, regulatory requirements and other corporate considerations, as determined by management. Share repurchases may not occur and may be discontinued at any time. At June 30, 2019, 82,725 shares had been repurchased under the program at a total cost of $1,438,000, or 17.38 per share. The maximum number of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan is 333,275 at June 30, 2019.

Item 3 – Defaults Upon Senior Securities

Not applicable.

Item 4 – Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Item 5 – Other Information

None.

Table of Contents

Item 6 – Exhibits


2.1(a)						Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated May 31, 2018, by and between Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. and Mercersburg Financial Corporation, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Form 8-K filed June 1, 2018.

2.1(b)						Agreement and Plan of Merger, dated October 23, 2018, by and between Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. and Hamilton Bancorp, Inc., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 2.1 of the Registrant's Form 8-K filed October 24, 2018.

3.1						Articles of Incorporation as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 of the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed on January 29, 2010.

3.2						By-laws as amended, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.2 to the Registrant’s Report on Form 8-K filed January 30, 2018.

4.1						Specimen Common Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form S-3 filed February 8, 2010 (File No. 333-164780).

10.1						Employment Agreement between Orrstown Financial Services, Inc. and Thomas R. Brugger, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrant's Report on Form 8-K filed June 25, 2019.

10.2						Change in Control Agreement between Orrstown Financial Services, Inc., Orrstown Bank and Thomas R. Brugger, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrant's Report on Form 8-K filed June 25, 2019.

31.1						Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification (Principal Executive Officer)

31.2						Rule 13a – 14(a)/15d-14(a) Certifications (Interim Chief Accounting Officer)

32.1						Section 1350 Certifications (Principal Executive Officer)

32.2						Section 1350 Certifications (Interim Chief Accounting Officer)

101.LAB						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase

101.PRE						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase

101.INS						XBRL Instance Document

101.SCH						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Schema

101.CAL						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase

101.DEF						XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase

All other exhibits for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions or are inapplicable and therefore have been omitted.

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.


			/s/ Thomas R. Quinn, Jr.
			Thomas R. Quinn, Jr.
			President and Chief Executive Officer
			(Principal Executive Officer)

			/s/ Gary A. Manley
			Gary A. Manley
			Interim Chief Accounting Officer
			(Chief Accounting Officer)

			Date: August 8, 2019