Orthofix Medical Inc. - Quarter Report: 2009 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
DC 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
one)
x
|
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2009
OR
o
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For the
transition period from____________ to ____________.
Commission
File Number: 0-19961
ORTHOFIX
INTERNATIONAL N.V.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Netherlands
Antilles
|
N/A
|
|
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
7
Abraham de Veerstraat
Curaçao
Netherlands
Antilles
|
N/A
|
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
599-9-4658525
|
||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such
filing requirements for the past 90 days.
Yes x No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes o No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one): Large Accelerated filer o Accelerated
filer x
Non-Accelerated filer o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No
x
As of May
5, 2009, 17,104,065 shares of common stock were issued and
outstanding.
Table of Contents
PART
I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
3
|
|
Item
2.
|
19
|
|
Item
3.
|
27
|
|
Item
4.
|
28
|
|
PART
II OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
29
|
|
Item
1A.
|
31
|
|
Item
4.
|
32
|
|
Item
6.
|
34
|
|
38
|
Forward-Looking
Statements
This Form
10-Q contains forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, which relate to our business and financial
outlook and which are based on our current beliefs, assumptions, expectations,
estimates, forecasts and projections. In some cases, you can identify
forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may,” “will,” “should,”
“expects,” “plans,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “projects,”
“intends,” “predicts,” “potential” or “continue” or other comparable
terminology. These forward-looking statements are not guarantees of
our future performance and involve risks, uncertainties, estimates and
assumptions that are difficult to predict. Therefore, our actual
outcomes and results may differ materially from those expressed in these
forward-looking statements. You should not place undue reliance on
any of these forward-looking statements. Further, any forward-looking
statement speaks only as of the date on which it is made, and we undertake no
obligation to update any such statement to reflect new information, the
occurrence of future events or circumstances or otherwise.
Factors
that could cause actual results to differ materially from those indicated by the
forward-looking statements or that could contribute to such differences include,
but are not limited to, risks relating to the expected sales of products,
including recently launched products, unanticipated expenditures, changing
relationships with customers, suppliers, strategic partners and lenders,
unfavorable results in litigation matters, risks relating to the protection of
intellectual property, changes to the reimbursement policies of third parties,
changes to and interpretation of governmental regulation of medical devices, the
impact of competitive products, changes to the competitive environment, the
acceptance of new products in the market, conditions of the orthopedic industry
and the economy, currency or interest rate fluctuations, corporate development
and marketing development activities, including acquisitions and divestitures,
unexpected costs or operating unit performance related to recent acquisitions,
unexpected difficulties meeting covenants under our senior secured bank credit
facility and the other risks described under Item 1A – “Business – Risk Factors”
in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008
and Part II, Item 1A – “Risk Factors” in this Form 10-Q.
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Condensed Consolidated
Financial Statements
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(U.S.
Dollars, in thousands except share data)
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(unaudited)
|
||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 6,817 | $ | 14,594 | ||||
Restricted
cash
|
11,194 | 10,998 | ||||||
Trade
accounts receivable, less allowance for doubtful accounts of $6,608 and
$6,473 at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively
|
109,448 | 110,720 | ||||||
Inventories,
net
|
91,948 | 91,185 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
18,824 | 17,543 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
29,369 | 29,610 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
267,600 | 274,650 | ||||||
Investments,
at cost
|
2,095 | 2,095 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
31,901 | 32,660 | ||||||
Patents
and other intangible assets, net
|
51,971 | 53,546 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
181,567 | 182,581 | ||||||
Deferred
taxes and other long-term assets
|
14,041 | 15,683 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 549,175 | $ | 561,215 | ||||
Liabilities
and shareholders’ equity
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Bank
borrowings
|
$ | 653 | $ | 1,907 | ||||
Current
portion of long-term debt
|
3,329 | 3,329 | ||||||
Trade
accounts payable
|
24,535 | 23,865 | ||||||
Other
current liabilities
|
45,733 | 45,894 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
74,250 | 74,995 | ||||||
Long-term
debt
|
264,730 | 277,533 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
4,562 | 4,509 | ||||||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
1,877 | 2,117 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
345,419 | 359,154 | ||||||
Contingencies
(Note 19)
|
||||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
shares $0.10 par value; 50,000,000 shares authorized; 17,104,065 and
17,103,142 issued and outstanding as of March 31, 2009 and December 31,
2008, respectively
|
1,710 | 1,710 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
169,449 | 167,818 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
32,526 | 29,647 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
71 | 2,886 | ||||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
203,756 | 202,061 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders’ equity
|
$ | 549,175 | $ | 561,215 |
The
accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited,
U.S. Dollars, in thousands except share and per share
data)
|
Three
Months Ended
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 128,974 | $ | 128,032 | ||||
Cost
of sales
|
32,806 | 34,238 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
96,168 | 93,794 | ||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
52,264 | 50,196 | ||||||
General
and administrative
|
22,684 | 22,180 | ||||||
Research
and development
|
9,087 | 6,354 | ||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
1,633 | 5,043 | ||||||
Gain
on sale of Pain Care® operations
|
- | (1,570 | ) | |||||
85,668 | 82,203 | |||||||
Operating
income
|
10,500 | 11,591 | ||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
||||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
(6,117 | ) | (5,390 | ) | ||||
Unrealized
non-cash gain on interest rate swap
|
239 | - | ||||||
Other
income (expense), net
|
(323 | ) | 494 | |||||
(6,201 | ) | (4,896 | ) | |||||
Income
before income taxes
|
4,299 | 6,695 | ||||||
Income
tax expense
|
(1,420 | ) | (3,089 | ) | ||||
Net
income
|
$ | 2,879 | $ | 3,606 | ||||
Net
income per common share – basic
|
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.21 | ||||
Net
income per common share – diluted
|
$ | 0.17 | $ | 0.21 | ||||
Weighted
average number of common shares - basic
|
17,103,543 | 17,087,003 | ||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares - diluted
|
17,121,571 | 17,261,172 |
The
accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
FOR
THE THREE MONTHS ENDED MARCH 31, 2009 AND 2008
(Unaudited,
U.S. Dollars, in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 2,879 | $ | 3,606 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
5,217 | 7,397 | ||||||
Amortization
of debt costs
|
49 | 395 | ||||||
Provision
for doubtful accounts
|
1,648 | 1,156 | ||||||
Deferred
taxes
|
(93 | ) | - | |||||
Share-based
compensation
|
2,824 | 2,094 | ||||||
Amortization
of step up of fair value in inventory
|
- | 152 | ||||||
Gain
on sale of Pain Care® operations
|
- | (1,570 | ) | |||||
Other
|
1,503 | (2,342 | ) | |||||
Change
in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Restricted
cash
|
(191 | ) | (1,773 | ) | ||||
Accounts
receivable
|
(1,686 | ) | (5,586 | ) | ||||
Inventories
|
(2,305 | ) | (8,447 | ) | ||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
79 | 2,627 | ||||||
Accounts
payable
|
1,090 | 3,809 | ||||||
Current
liabilities
|
86 | (616 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
11,100 | 902 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(3,536 | ) | (4,112 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of Pain Care® operations
|
- | 5,980 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) in investing activities
|
(3,536 | ) | 1,868 | |||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Net
proceeds from issuance of common shares
|
- | 1,907 | ||||||
Repayments
of long-term debt
|
(12,804 | ) | (4,524 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from (repayments of) bank borrowings, net
|
(1,128 | ) | 1,361 | |||||
Cash
payment for purchase of minority interest in subsidiary
|
(1,143 | ) | - | |||||
Tax
benefit on non-qualified stock options
|
- | 17 | ||||||
Net
cash used in financing activities
|
(15,075 | ) | (1,239 | ) | ||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash
|
(266 | ) | 136 | |||||
Net
increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
(7,777 | ) | 1,667 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at the beginning of the year
|
14,594 | 25,064 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at the end of the period
|
$ | 6,817 | $ | 26,731 |
The
accompanying notes form an integral part of these condensed consolidated
financial statements.
NOTES
TO THE CONDENSED UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
NOTE
1:
|
BUSINESS
|
Orthofix
International N.V. (the “Company”) is a multinational corporation principally
involved in the design, development, manufacture, marketing and distribution of
medical equipment, principally for the Orthopedic products
market. The Company is made up of four reportable segments: Domestic,
Spinal Implants and Biologics, Breg and International. See Note 13
for a description of each segment.
NOTE
2:
|
BASIS
OF PRESENTATION
|
The
accompanying unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements have been
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States for interim financial information and with the instructions to
Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X. Pursuant to these rules
and regulations, certain information and note disclosures, normally included in
financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States, have been condensed or omitted. In the
opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring items)
considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. Operating results for the three months ended March 31, 2009
are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year
ending December 31, 2009. The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has
been derived from the audited financial statements at that date but does not
include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States for complete financial
statements. For further information, refer to the Consolidated
Financial Statements and Notes thereto of the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
NOTE
3:
|
RECENTLY
ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
|
In
January 2009, the Company adopted, the FASB ratified Emerging Issues Task Force
(“EITF”) Issue No. 07-1, “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements” (“EITF
07-1”). EITF 07-1 provides guidance related to the classification of the
payments between participants, the appropriate income statement presentation, as
well as disclosures related to certain collaborative
arrangements. The adoption of EITF 07-1 did not have a material
impact on the Company’s results of operations or financial position, as the
Company had previously applied the guidance included in EITF 07-1 since there
was no prevailing guidance.
In
January 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 160, “Non-controlling Interests in Consolidated Financial
Statements, an Amendment of ARB 51” (“SFAS No. 160”). SFAS No. 160
establishes accounting and reporting standards pertaining to ownership interest
in subsidiaries held by parties other than the parent, the amount of net income
attributable to the parent and to the non-controlling interest, changes in a
parent’s ownership interest, and the valuation of any retained non-controlling
equity investment when a subsidiary is deconsolidated. SFAS No. 160
also establishes disclosure requirements that clearly identify and distinguish
between the interests of the parent and the interests of the non-controlling
owners. SFAS No. 160 and its adoption changed the method in which the
Company accounted for the minority interest acquisition during the first quarter
of 2009. SFAS No. 160 requires the excess purchase price over the
minority interest liability (at the time of the acquisition) to be recorded as a
reduction in Additional paid-in capital, rather than goodwill. The
disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 160 did not have an impact on the Company’s
financial reporting as the remaining minority interest liability is
immaterial.
NOTE
4:
|
SHARE-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
The
Company accounts for its share-based compensation plans in accordance with SFAS
No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment”. Under SFAS No. 123(R), all
share-based compensation costs are measured at the grant date, based on the
estimated fair value of the award, and are recognized as expense in the
statement of operations over the requisite service period. Commencing
in June 2007, the Company offered restricted shares in addition to stock options
as a form of share-based compensation.
The
following table shows the detail of share-based compensation by line item in the
Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three months ended March
31, 2009 and 2008:
(US$
in thousands)
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Cost
of sales
|
$ | 66 | $ | 113 | ||||
Sales
and marketing
|
504 | 184 | ||||||
General
and administrative
|
2,137 | 1,564 | ||||||
Research
and development
|
117 | 233 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,824 | $ | 2,094 |
There are
no performance requirements for share-based compensation awarded to
employees.
NOTE
5:
|
RECLASSIFICATIONS
|
Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified to conform to the 2009
presentation. The reclassifications have no effect on previously
reported net income or shareholders’ equity.
NOTE
6:
|
INVENTORIES
|
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost or estimated net realizable value, after
provision for excess or obsolete items. Cost is determined on a weighted-average
basis, which approximates the FIFO method. The valuation of
work-in-process, finished goods, field inventory and consignment inventory
includes the cost of materials, labor and production. Field inventory
represents immediately saleable finished goods inventory that is in the
possession of the Company’s direct sales representatives.
Inventories
were as follows:
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
(US$
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 9,444 | $ | 9,314 | ||||
Work-in-process
|
8,683 | 8,829 | ||||||
Finished
products
|
56,899 | 57,151 | ||||||
Field
inventory
|
14,430 | 13,633 | ||||||
Consignment
inventory
|
24,244 | 23,426 | ||||||
113,700 | 112,353 | |||||||
Less
reserve for obsolescence
|
(21,752 | ) | (21,168 | ) | ||||
$ | 91,948 | $ | 91,185 |
NOTE
7:
|
GOODWILL
|
The
changes in the carrying value of goodwill by reportable segment for the period
ended March 31, 2009 are as follows:
(US$
in thousands)
|
Domestic
|
Spinal
Implants and Biologics
|
Breg
|
International
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
At
December 31, 2008
|
$ | 31,793 | $ | 9,367 | $ | 99,295 | $ | 42,126 | $ | 182,581 | ||||||||||
Foreign
currency
|
- | - | - | (1,014 | ) | (1,014 | ) | |||||||||||||
At
March 31, 2009
|
$ | 31,793 | $ | 9,367 | $ | 99,295 | $ | 41,112 | $ | 181,567 |
NOTE
8:
|
PATENTS
AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS
|
(US$
in thousands)
Cost
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
||||||
Patents
and developed technologies
|
$ | 25,785 | $ | 25,602 | ||||
Trademarks
– definite lived (subject to amortization)
|
108 | 105 | ||||||
Trademarks
– indefinite lived (not subject to amortization)
|
23,406 | 23,382 | ||||||
Distribution
networks
|
44,586 | 44,586 | ||||||
93,885 | 93,675 | |||||||
Accumulated
amortization
|
||||||||
Patents
and developed technologies
|
(13,940 | ) | (13,194 | ) | ||||
Trademarks
– definite lived (subject to amortization)
|
(108 | ) | (105 | ) | ||||
Distribution
networks
|
(27,866 | ) | (26,830 | ) | ||||
Patents
and other intangible assets, net
|
$ | 51,971 | $ | 53,546 |
Amortization
expense for intangible assets is estimated to be approximately $4.5 million for the
remainder of 2009 and $5.9 million, $5.9 million, $4.6 million, $1.5 million and
$6.2 million for the periods ending December 31, 2010, 2011, 2012, 2013,
and 2014 and thereafter, respectively.
NOTE
9:
|
BANK
BORROWINGS
|
(US$
in thousands)
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
||||||
Borrowings
under line of credit
|
$ | 653 | $ | 1,907 |
The
weighted average interest rates on borrowings under lines of credit as of March
31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were 4.29% and 5.86%, respectively.
Borrowings
under lines of credit consist of borrowings in Euros. The Company had
unused available lines of credit of 6.8 million Euros ($9.0 million) and 5.2
million Euros ($7.3 million) at March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008,
respectively, in its Italian line of credit, which gives the Company the option
to borrow amounts in Italy at rates which are determined at the time of
borrowing. This line of credit is unsecured.
NOTE
10:
|
LONG-TERM
DEBT
|
(US$
in thousands)
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31,
2008
|
||||||
Long-term
obligations
|
$ | 267,875 | $ | 280,700 | ||||
Other
loans
|
184 | 162 | ||||||
268,059 | 280,862 | |||||||
Less
current portion
|
(3,329 | ) | (3,329 | ) | ||||
$ | 264,730 | $ | 277,533 |
On
September 22, 2006 the Company’s wholly-owned U.S. holding company subsidiary,
Orthofix Holdings, Inc. (“Orthofix Holdings”), entered into a senior secured
credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions to finance the
acquisition of Blackstone Medical Inc. (“Blackstone”). Certain terms of
the senior secured credit facility were amended September 29, 2008. The
senior secured credit facility provides for (1) a seven-year amortizing term
loan facility of $330.0 million and (2) a six-year revolving credit facility of
$45.0 million. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had no amounts
outstanding under the revolving credit facility and $267.9 million outstanding
under the term loan facility. Obligations under the senior secured credit
facility have a floating interest rate of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate
(“LIBOR”) plus a margin, with a LIBOR floor of 3.0% or prime rate plus a
margin. Currently, the term loan includes a $150.0 million LIBOR loan plus
a margin of 4.50% and $117.9 million prime rate loan plus a margin of 3.50%. The
effective interest rates on the senior secured credit facility, including the
impact of an interest rate swap (see Note 17), as of March 31, 2009 and December
31, 2008 were 8.6% and 8.4%, respectively.
Each of
the domestic subsidiaries of the Company (which includes Orthofix Inc., Breg
Inc., and Blackstone) and Colgate Medical Limited and Victory Medical Limited
(wholly-owned financing subsidiaries of the Company) have guaranteed the
obligations of Orthofix Holdings under the senior secured credit facility.
The obligations of the subsidiaries under their guarantees are secured by the
pledges of their respective assets.
Certain
subsidiaries of the Company have restrictions on their ability to pay dividends
or make intercompany loan advances pursuant to the Company’s senior secured
credit facility. The net assets of Orthofix Holdings and its subsidiaries
are restricted for distributions to the parent company. Domestic
subsidiaries of the Company, as parties to the credit agreement, have access to
these net assets for operational purposes. The amount of restricted net
assets of Orthofix Holdings and its subsidiaries as of March 31, 2009 is $118.4
million compared to $111.3 million at December 31, 2008. In addition,
the senior secured credit facility restricts the Company and subsidiaries that
are not parties to the credit facility from access to cash held by Colgate
Medical Limited and its subsidiaries. All credit party subsidiaries
have access to this cash for operational and debt repayment
purposes. The amount of restricted cash of the Company as of March
31, 2009 is $11.2 million compared to $11.0 million at December 31,
2008.
Weighted
average interest rates on current maturities of long-term obligations as of
March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were 8.6% and 8.4%,
respectively.
NOTE
11:
|
COMMON
SHARES
|
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009, there were 923 shares of common stock issued
upon the vesting of restricted stock.
NOTE
12:
|
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME (LOSS)
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive income is comprised of foreign currency translation
adjustments and the effective portion of the gain (loss) for derivatives
designated and accounted for as cash flow hedges. The components of and changes
in accumulated other comprehensive income are as follows:
(US$
in thousands)
|
Foreign
Currency Translation Adjustments
|
Fair
Value of Derivative
|
Accumulated
Other Comprehensive Income/(Loss)
|
|||||||||
Balance
at December 31, 2008
|
$ | (211 | ) | $ | 3,097 | $ | 2,886 | |||||
Unrealized
loss on derivative instruments, net of tax of $(734)
|
- | (1,889 | ) | (1,889 | ) | |||||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
(926 | ) | - | (926 | ) | |||||||
Balance
at March 31, 2009
|
$ | (1,137 | ) | $ | 1,208 | $ | 71 |
Comprehensive
income is comprised of the following components:
(US$
in thousands)
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 2,879 | $ | 3,606 | ||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||
Unrealized
gain (loss) on derivative instrument, net of tax
|
(1,889 | ) | 2,824 | |||||
Foreign
currency translation adjustment
|
(926 | ) | (1,627 | ) | ||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$ | 64 | $ | 4,803 |
NOTE
13:
|
BUSINESS
SEGMENT INFORMATION
|
The
Company’s segment information is prepared on the same basis that the Company’s
management reviews the financial information for operational decision making
purposes. The Company is comprised of the following segments:
Domestic
Domestic
(“Domestic”) consists of operations in the United States of Orthofix Inc., which
designs, manufactures and distributes stimulation and orthopedic
products. Domestic uses both direct and distributor sales
representatives to sell Spine and Orthopedic products to hospitals, doctors and
other healthcare providers in the United States market.
Spinal
Implants and Biologics
Spinal
Implants and Biologics (“Spinal Implants and Biologics”) consists of Blackstone,
based in Springfield, Massachusetts and its two subsidiaries, Blackstone GmbH
and Goldstone GmbH. Spinal Implants and Biologics specializes in the design,
development and marketing of spinal implant and related human cellular and
tissue based products (“HCT/P products”, often referred to as Biologic
products). Spinal Implants and Biologics distributes its products through a
network of domestic and international distributors, sales representatives and
affiliates.
Breg
Breg,
Inc. (“Breg”), based in Vista, California, designs, manufactures, and
distributes orthopedic products for post-operative reconstruction and
rehabilitative patient use and sells its products through a network of domestic
and international distributors, sales representatives and
affiliates.
International
International
(“International”) consists of international operations located in Europe,
Mexico, Brazil and Puerto Rico, as well as independent distributors located
outside the United States. International uses both direct and
distributor sales representatives to sell Spine, Orthopedics, Sports Medicine,
Vascular and Other products to hospitals, doctors, and other healthcare
providers.
Group
Activities
Group
activities are comprised of the operating expenses and identifiable assets of
Orthofix International N.V. and its U.S. holding company subsidiary, Orthofix
Holdings, Inc.
The
following tables below present information by reportable segment for the three
months ended March 31:
External
Sales
|
Intersegment
Sales
|
|||||||||||||||
(US$
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 49,797 | $ | 44,127 | $ | 1,580 | $ | 1,621 | ||||||||
Spinal
Implants and Biologics
|
28,519 | 28,831 | 365 | 1,524 | ||||||||||||
Breg
|
23,110 | 22,063 | 1,510 | 1,538 | ||||||||||||
International
|
27,548 | 33,011 | 4,638 | 5,499 | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 128,974 | $ | 128,032 | $ | 8,093 | $ | 10,182 |
The
following table presents operating income (loss) by segment for the three months
ended March 31:
Operating
Income (Loss)
|
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
|||||||
(US$
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 16,652 | $ | 14,133 | ||||
Spinal
Implants and Biologics
|
(7,732 | ) (1) | (3,807 | ) | ||||
Breg
|
3,030 | 4,371 | ||||||
International
|
3,674 | 4,564 | ||||||
Group
Activities
|
(5,472 | ) | (7,816 | ) | ||||
Eliminations
|
348 | 146 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 10,500 | $ | 11,591 |
(1) Includes
$2.8 million of research and development expense from collaborative arrangements
and $1.3 million of restructuring charges.
The
following tables present sales by market sector for the three months ended March
31, 2009 and 2008:
Sales
by Market Sector
for
the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(US$
in thousands)
|
Domestic
|
Spinal
Implants and Biologics
|
Breg
|
International
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Spine
|
$ | 37,283 | $ | 28,519 | $ | - | $ | 326 | $ | 66,128 | ||||||||||
Orthopedics
|
12,514 | - | - | 17,079 | 29,593 | |||||||||||||||
Sports
Medicine
|
- | - | 23,110 | 1,136 | 24,246 | |||||||||||||||
Vascular
|
- | - | - | 4,408 | 4,408 | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
- | - | - | 4,599 | 4,599 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 49,797 | $ | 28,519 | $ | 23,110 | $ | 27,548 | $ | 128,974 |
Sales
by Market Sector
for
the three months ended March 31, 2008
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(US$
in thousands)
|
Domestic
|
Spinal
Implants and Biologics
|
Breg
|
International
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||
Spine
|
$ | 33,373 | $ | 28,831 | $ | - | $ | 254 | $ | 62,458 | ||||||||||
Orthopedics
|
10,754 | - | - | 19,007 | 29,761 | |||||||||||||||
Sports
Medicine
|
- | - | 22,063 | 1,260 | 23,323 | |||||||||||||||
Vascular
|
- | - | - | 5,376 | 5,376 | |||||||||||||||
Other
|
- | - | - | 7,114 | 7,114 | |||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 44,127 | $ | 28,831 | $ | 22,063 | $ | 33,011 | $ | 128,032 |
The
following table presents identifiable assets by segment, excluding intercompany
balances and investments in consolidated subsidiaries.
Identifiable
Assets
|
||||||||
(US$
in thousands)
|
March
31,
2009
|
December
31, 2008
|
||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 109,819 | $ | 110,981 | ||||
Spinal
Implants and Biologics
|
119,701 | 121,508 | ||||||
Breg
|
171,760 | 172,398 | ||||||
International
|
138,255 | 146,444 | ||||||
Group
activities
|
11,082 | 10,624 | ||||||
Eliminations
|
(1,442 | ) | (740 | ) | ||||
Total
|
$ | 549,175 | $ | 561,215 |
NOTE
14:
|
RESTRUCTURING
CHARGES
|
In the
fourth quarter of 2008, the Company initiated a restructuring plan to improve
operations and reduce costs at Blackstone. The plan involves the
consolidation of substantially all of Blackstone’s current operations in Wayne,
NJ and Springfield, MA into the same facility housing its spine stimulation and
US orthopedics business in the Dallas, TX area. During the three months
ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded net restructuring charges of $1.3
million, which were primarily related to severance costs and accelerated
depreciation costs related to shortening lives of assets which will be disposed
of. These restructuring costs are recorded in general and administrative expense
and are classified in the Spinal Implants and Biologics segment. The Company
plans to complete the restructuring and consolidation by the fourth quarter of
2009.
NOTE
15:
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
The
difference between the reported tax provision as a percentage of income before
income taxes of 33.0% and the U.S. statutory rate of 35% is
principally related to the benefits associated with the Company’s mix of
earnings and a restructuring of the Company’s European operations in 2006
whereby certain intangible assets were sold between subsidiaries in order to
optimize the Company’s supply chain, partially offset by the generation of
current period un-benefitted net operating losses in various foreign
jurisdictions.
As of
March 31, 2009, the Company’s gross unrecognized tax benefit was $0.7
million. The Company recognizes potential accrued interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within its global operations in
income tax expense. As of March 31, 2009, the Company had
approximately $0.4 million accrued for interest and
penalties. The entire $1.1 million of unrecognized tax benefit would
affect the Company’s effective tax rate if recognized. The Company
does not expect the amount of unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly
over the next twelve months.
The
Company is subject to tax examinations in all major taxing jurisdictions in
which it operates. The Company files a consolidated income tax return
in the U.S. federal jurisdiction and numerous consolidated and separate income
tax returns in many state and foreign jurisdictions. The statute of limitations
with respect to U.S. federal tax filings is closed for years prior to
December 31, 2004. The statute of limitations for the various
U.S. state tax filings is closed in most instances for years prior to
December 31, 2005. There are certain U.S. state tax statutes
open for years from 1997 forward due to current examinations. The
statutes of limitations with respect to the major foreign tax filing
jurisdictions are generally closed for years prior to December 31,
2004.
NOTE
16:
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, there were no adjustments to net
income for purposes of calculating basic and diluted net income per common
share. The following table is a reconciliation of the weighted
average shares used in the basic and diluted net income per common share
computations.
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Weighted
average common shares - basic
|
17,103,543 | 17,087,003 | ||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities
|
18,028 | 174,169 | ||||||
Weighted
average common shares – diluted
|
17,121,571 | 17,261,172 |
For the
three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not include
3,011,105 options
and 260,668 options, respectively in the diluted shares outstanding calculation
because their inclusion would have been anti-dilutive or because their exercise
price exceeded the average market price of the Company’s common stock during the
period.
NOTE
17:
|
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS
|
In 2006,
the Company entered into a cross-currency swap agreement to manage its foreign
currency exposure related to a portion of the Company’s intercompany receivable
of a U.S. dollar functional currency subsidiary that is denominated in
Euro. The derivative instrument, a ten-year fully amortizable
agreement with a notional amount of $63.0 million, is scheduled to expire on
December 30, 2016. The instrument is designated as a cash flow
hedge. The amount outstanding under the agreement as of March 31,
2009 and December 31, 2008 is $56.7 million. Under the agreement, the
Company pays Euro and receives U.S. dollars based on scheduled cash flows in the
agreement. The Company recognized an unrealized gain (loss) on the change in
fair value of this swap arrangement of $(1.9) million and $2.8 million, net of
tax, within other comprehensive income in the three months ended March 31, 2009
and 2008, respectively.
In June
2008, the Company entered into a three year fully amortizable interest rate swap
agreement (the “Swap”) with a notional amount of $150.0 million and an
expiration date of June 30, 2011. During the second and third
quarters of 2008, the interest rate Swap was accounted for as a cash flow hedge,
and changes in its value were recorded as part of accumulated other
comprehensive income on the balance sheet. Due to declining interest
rates and a LIBOR floor in the Company's amended credit facility, the
effectiveness of the Swap was no longer deemed highly
effective. Therefore, during the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company
incurred an unrealized, non-cash loss of approximately $8.0 million which
resulted from changes in the fair value of the Company’s interest rate
Swap. Cash flow accounting is no longer applied and
mark-to-market adjustments are required to be reported in current earnings
through the expiration of the Swap in June 2011. For the three months
ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded an unrealized gain of $0.2 million in
other income (expense), net on the statement of operations. The
Swap continues to provide an economic hedge against fluctuating interest rate
exposure on the $150.0 million portion of outstanding debt it covers, should the
LIBOR interest rate rise above 3.73%.
As
required by SFAS No. 161 “Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” (“SFAS No. 161”), the tables below disclose the types of derivative
instruments the Company owns, the classifications and fair values of these
instruments within the balance sheet, and the amount of gain (loss) recognized
in other comprehensive income (“OCI”) or income.
(US$
in thousands)
As
of and for the three months ended March 31, 2009
|
Fair
value: favorable (unfavorable)
|
Balance
sheet location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recognized in OCI
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recognized in income
|
|||||||||
Cross-currency
swap
|
$ | 1,328 |
Other
long-term assets
|
$ | (1,889 | ) | $ | - | |||||
Interest
rate swap
|
$ | (7,737 | ) |
Other
current liabilities
|
$ | - | $ | 239 |
As
of and for the three months ended March 31,
2008
|
Fair
value: favorable (unfavorable)
|
Balance
sheet location
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recognized in OCI
|
Amount
of gain (loss) recognized in income
|
||||||||||||
Cross-currency
swap
|
$ | (8,485 | ) |
Other
long-term liabilities
|
$ | 2,824 | $ | - | ||||||||
Interest
rate swap
|
N/A | N/A | N/A | N/A |
NOTE
18: FAIR
VALUE MEASUREMENTS
The
Company adopted SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” effective January 1,
2008. SFAS No. 157 defines fair value as the price that would be
received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the
principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly
transaction between market participants on the measurement
date. Non-financial assets and liabilities of the Company measured at
fair value include any long-lived assets or equity method investments that are
impaired in a currently reported period. SFAS No. 157 also describes
three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1 –
quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities
Level 2 –
observable inputs other than quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets and liabilities
Level 3 –
unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data available, which
require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions
The fair
value of the Company’s financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value
on a recurring basis were as follows:
Balance
March
31,
2009
|
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
|||||||||||||
Derivative
Financial Instruments(1)
|
||||||||||||||||
Cash
Flow Hedges
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
rate hedge
|
$ | (7,737 | ) | $ | - | $ | (7,737 | ) | $ | - | ||||||
Cross
currency hedge
|
$ | 1,328 | $ | - | $ | 1,328 | $ | - |
(1) See
Note 17, “Derivative Instruments”.
NOTE
19:
|
CONTINGENCIES
|
Litigation
On or
about July 23, 2007, our subsidiary, Blackstone received a subpoena issued
by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General,
under the authority of the federal healthcare anti-kickback and false claims
statutes. The subpoena seeks documents for the period January 1, 2000
through July 31, 2006, which is prior to Blackstone’s acquisition by the
Company. The Company believes that the subpoena concerns the
compensation of physician consultants and related matters. On
September 17, 2007, the Company submitted a claim for indemnification from the
escrow fund established in connection with the agreement and plan of merger
between the Company, New Era Medical Corp. and Blackstone, dated as of
August 4, 2006 (the “Blackstone Merger Agreement”), for any losses to us
resulting from this matter. The Company was subsequently notified by
legal counsel for the former shareholders that the representative of the former
shareholders of Blackstone has objected to the indemnification claim and intends
to contest it in accordance with the terms of the Blackstone Merger
Agreement.
On or
about January 7, 2008, the Company received a federal grand jury subpoena from
the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of
Massachusetts. The subpoena seeks documents from the Company for the
period January 1, 2000 through July 15, 2007. The Company believes
that the subpoena concerns the compensation of physician consultants and related
matters, and further believes that it is associated with the Department of
Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General’s investigation of such
matters. On September 18, 2008, the Company submitted a claim
for indemnification from the escrow fund established in connection with the
Blackstone Merger Agreement for any losses to the Company resulting from
this matter. On or about April 29, 2009, counsel for the Company
received a HIPAA subpoena issued by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District
of Massachusetts. The subpoena seeks documents from the Company for
the period January 1, 2000 through July 15, 2007. The Company
believes that the subpoena concerns the compensation of physician consultants
and related matters, and further believes that it is associated with the
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General’s
investigation of such matters, as well as the January 7, 2008 federal grand jury
subpoena.
On or
about December 5, 2008, the Company obtained a copy of a qui tam complaint filed
by Susan Hutcheson and Philip Brown against Blackstone and the Company in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. A qui tam
action is a civil lawsuit brought by an individual for an alleged violation of a
federal statute, in which the U.S. Department of Justice has the right to
intervene and take over the prosecution of the lawsuit at its
option. On November 21, 2008, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a
notice of non-intervention in the case. The complaint was served on
Blackstone on or about March 24, 2009 and counsel for the Company subsequently
agreed to accept service on Orthofix’s behalf. The complaint alleges
a cause of action under the False Claims Act for alleged inappropriate payments
and other items of value conferred on physician consultants, as well as a cause
of action for retaliation and wrongful discharge. The Company
believes that this lawsuit is related to the matters described above involving
the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General,
and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of
Massachusetts. The Company intends to defend vigorously against this
lawsuit. On September 18, 2008, after being informed of the existence
of the lawsuit by representatives of the U.S. Department of Justice and prior to
the unsealing of the complaint (which was unsealed by the court on or about
November 24, 2008), the Company submitted a claim for indemnification from
the escrow fund established in connection with the Blackstone Merger
Agreement for any losses to us resulting from this matter.
On or
about September 27, 2007, Blackstone received a federal grand jury subpoena
issued by the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada
(“USAO-Nevada subpoena”). The subpoena seeks documents for the period from
January 1999 to the date of issuance of the subpoena. The Company believes that
the subpoena concerns payments or gifts made by Blackstone to certain
physicians. On February 29, 2008, Blackstone received a Civil
Investigative Demand (“CID”) from the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office,
Public Protection and Advocacy Bureau, Healthcare Division. The
Company believes that the CID seeks documents concerning Blackstone’s financial
relationships with certain physicians and related matters for the period from
March 2004 through the date of issuance of the CID. The Ohio Attorney General’s
Office, Health Care Fraud Section has issued a criminal subpoena, dated August
8, 2008, to Orthofix, Inc. (the “Ohio AG subpoena”). The Ohio AG
subpoena seeks documents for the period from January 1, 2000 through the date of
issuance of the subpoena. The Company believes that the Ohio AG
subpoena arises from a government investigation that concerns the compensation
of physician consultants and related matters. On September 18, 2008,
the Company submitted a claim for indemnification from the escrow fund
established in connection with the Blackstone Merger Agreement for any
losses to us resulting from the USAO-Nevada subpoena, the Massachusetts CID and
the Ohio AG subpoena.
By order
entered on January 4, 2007, the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Arkansas unsealed a qui tam complaint captioned Thomas v. Chan, et
al., 4:06-cv-00465-JLH, filed against Dr. Patrick Chan, Blackstone and other
defendants including another device manufacturer. The complaint
alleges causes of action under the False Claims Act for alleged
inappropriate payments and other items of value conferred on Dr.
Chan. The Company believes that Blackstone has meritorious defenses
to the claims alleged and the Company intends to defend vigorously against this
lawsuit. On September 17, 2007, the Company submitted a claim for
indemnification from the escrow fund established in connection with
the Blackstone Merger Agreement for any losses to us resulting from this
matter. The Company was subsequently notified by legal counsel for
the former shareholders that the representative of the former shareholders of
Blackstone has objected to the indemnification claim and intends to contest it
in accordance with the terms of the Blackstone Merger Agreement.
The
Company is unable to predict the outcome of each of the escrow claims described
above in the preceding paragraphs or to estimate the amount, if any, that may
ultimately be returned to the Company from the escrow fund and there can be no
assurance that losses to us from these matters will not exceed the amount of the
escrow account. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, included
in Prepaid expenses and other current assets is approximately $10.3 million and
$8.3 million of escrow receivable balances related to the Blackstone matters
described above, respectively.
In
addition to the foregoing claims, the Company has submitted claims for
indemnification from the escrow fund established in connection with the
Blackstone Merger Agreement for losses that have or may result from certain
civil actions filed against Blackstone as well as certain claims against
Blackstone alleging rights to payments for Blackstone stock options not
reflected in Blackstone's corporate ledger at the time of Blackstone's
acquisition by the Company, or that the shares or stock options subject to those
claims were improperly diluted by Blackstone. To date, the representative
of the former shareholders of Blackstone has not objected
to approximately $1.5 million in such claims from the escrow fund,
with certain claims remaining pending.
On or
about April 10, 2009, the Company received a HIPAA subpoena
(“HIPAA subpoena”) issued by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of
Massachusetts. The subpoena seeks documents for the period January
1, 1995 through the date of the subpoena. The Company
believes that the subpoena concerns the classification and marketing of its
bone growth stimulators and related matters. The Company intends
to cooperate with the government's requests. The Company is unable to predict
what actions, if any, might be taken by the government or what impact, if
any, the outcome of this matter might have on the Company’s consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On or
about April 14, 2009, the Company obtained a copy of a qui tam complaint filed
by Jeffrey J. Bierman in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Massachusetts against Orthofix, Inc., the Company, and other companies that have
allegedly manufactured bone growth stimulation devices, including Orthologic
Corp., DJO Incorporated, Reable Therapeutics, Inc., the Blackstone Group, L.P.,
Biomet, Inc., EBI, L.P., EBI Holdings, Inc., EBI Medical Systems, Inc.,
Bioelectron, Inc., LBV Acquisition, Inc., and Smith & Nephew, Inc. By order entered on
March 24, 2009, the court unsealed the case. The amended complaint
alleges various causes of action under the federal False Claims Act and state
and city false claims acts premised on the contention that the defendants
improperly promote the sale, as opposed to the rental, of bone growth
stimulation devices. The amended complaint also includes claims
against the defendants for, among other things, allegedly misleading physicians
and purportedly causing them to file false claims and for allegedly violating
the Anti-kickback Act by providing free products to physicians, waiving
patients’ insurance co-payments, and providing inducements to independent sales
agents to generate business. The Company believes that this lawsuit
is related to the matter described above involving the HIPAA
subpoena. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, the plaintiff has
not served either Orthofix, Inc. or the Company. If served, the
Company intends to defend vigorously against this lawsuit.
Effective
October 29, 2007, Blackstone, entered into a settlement agreement of a patent
infringement lawsuit brought by certain affiliates of Medtronic Sofamor Danek
USA Inc. In that lawsuit, the Medtronic plaintiffs had alleged that they were
the exclusive licensees of certain US patents and that Blackstone's making,
selling, offering for sale, and using its Blackstone Anterior Cervical Plate, 3º
Anterior Cervical Plate, Hallmark Anterior Cervical Plate and Construx Mini PEEK
VBR System products within the United States willfully infringed the subject
patents. Blackstone denied infringement and asserted that the Patents were
invalid. The settlement agreement is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows. On July 20, 2007, the Company submitted a claim
for indemnification from the escrow fund established in connection with
the Blackstone Merger Agreement for any losses to us resulting from this
matter. The Company was subsequently notified by legal counsel for
the former shareholders that the representative of the former shareholders of
Blackstone has objected to the indemnification claim and intends to contest it
in accordance with the terms of the Blackstone Merger Agreement.
The
Company cannot predict the outcome of any proceedings or claims made against the
Company or its subsidiaries described in the preceding paragraphs and there can
be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of any claim will not have a
material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In
addition to the foregoing, in the normal course of our business, the
Company is involved in various lawsuits from time to time and may be
subject to certain other contingencies.
Concentrations
of credit risk
There
have been no material changes from the information provided in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008.
Item
2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations
The
following discussion and analysis addresses our liquidity, financial condition,
and the results of our operations for the three months ended March 31, 2009
compared to our results of operations for the three months ended March 31,
2008. These discussions should be read in conjunction with our
historical consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and the
other financial information included in this Form 10-Q and in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
General
We are a
diversified orthopedic products company offering a broad line of surgical and
non-surgical products for the Spine, Orthopedics, Sports Medicine and Vascular
market sectors. Our products are designed to address the lifelong
bone-and-joint health needs of patients of all ages, helping them achieve a more
active and mobile lifestyle. We design, develop, manufacture, market
and distribute medical equipment used principally by musculoskeletal medical
specialists for orthopedic applications. Our main products are
invasive and minimally invasive spinal implant products and related human
cellular and tissue based products (“HCT/P products”), non-invasive bone growth
stimulation products used to enhance the success rate of spinal fusions and to
treat non-union fractures, external and internal fixation devices used in
fracture treatment, limb lengthening and bone reconstruction; and bracing
products used for ligament injury prevention, pain management and protection of
surgical repair to promote faster healing. Our products also include
a device for enhancing venous circulation, cold therapy, bone cement and devices
for removal of bone cement used to fix artificial implants and airway management
products used in anesthesia applications.
We have
administrative and training facilities in the United States and Italy and
manufacturing facilities in the United States, the United Kingdom, Italy and
Mexico. We directly distribute our products in the United States, the
United Kingdom, Italy, Germany, Switzerland, Austria, France, Belgium, Mexico,
Brazil, and Puerto Rico. In several of these and other markets, we
also distribute our products through independent distributors.
Our
condensed consolidated financial statements include the financial results of the
Company and its wholly-owned and majority-owned subsidiaries and entities over
which we have control. All intercompany accounts and transactions are
eliminated in consolidation.
Our
reporting currency is the United States Dollar. All balance sheet
accounts, except shareholders’ equity, are translated at period-end exchange
rates, and revenue and expense items are translated at weighted average rates of
exchange prevailing during the period. Gains and losses resulting
from foreign currency transactions are included in other income
(expense). Gains and losses resulting from the translation of foreign
currency financial statements are recorded in the accumulated other
comprehensive income component of shareholders’ equity.
Our
financial condition, results of operations and cash flows are not significantly
impacted by seasonality trends. However, sales associated with
products for elective procedures appear to be influenced by the somewhat lower
level of such procedures performed in the late summer. Certain of the
Breg® bracing products experience greater demand in the fall and winter
corresponding with high school and college football schedules and winter
sports. In addition, we do not believe our operations will be
significantly affected by inflation. However, in the ordinary course
of business, we are exposed to the impact of changes in interest rates and
foreign currency fluctuations. Our objective is to limit the impact
of such movements on earnings and cash flows. In order to achieve
this objective, we seek to balance non-dollar income and
expenditures. During the three months ended March 31, 2009 and all
of 2008, we have used derivative instruments to hedge certain foreign
currency fluctuation exposures as well as interest rate exposure on LIBOR-based
borrowings. See Item 3 – “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures
About Market Risk.”
We manage
our operations as four business segments: Domestic, Spinal Implants and
Biologics, Breg, and International. Domestic consists of operations
of our subsidiary Orthofix Inc. Spinal Implants and Biologics consist
of our Blackstone subsidiary and their domestic and international
operations. Breg consists of Breg Inc.’s domestic operations and
international distributors. International consists of
operations which are located in the rest of the world as well as independent
export distribution operations. Group Activities are comprised of the
operating expenses and identifiable assets of Orthofix International N.V. and
its U.S. holding company subsidiary, Orthofix Holdings, Inc.
Segment
and Market Sector Revenues
The
following tables display net sales by business segment and net sales by market
sector. We keep our books and records and account for net sales,
costs of sales and expenses by business segment. We provide net sales
by market sector for information purposes only.
Business
Segment:
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||
(US$
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
||||||||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
Percent
of
Total
Net Sales
|
Net
Sales
|
Percent
of Total Net Sales
|
Growth
|
||||||||||||||||
Domestic
|
$ | 49,797 | 39 | % | $ | 44,127 | 34 | % | 13 | % | ||||||||||
Spinal
Implants and Biologics
|
28,519 | 22 | % | 28,831 | 23 | % | -1 | % | ||||||||||||
Breg
|
23,110 | 18 | % | 22,063 | 17 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||||
International
|
27,548 | 21 | % | 33,011 | 26 | % | -17 | % | ||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 128,974 | 100 | % | $ | 128,032 | 100 | % | 1 | % |
Market
Sector:
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
Percent
of Total Net Sales
|
Net
Sales
|
Percent
of Total Net Sales
|
Reported
Growth
|
Constant
Currency Growth
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Spine
|
$ | 66,128 | 51 | % | $ | 62,458 | 49 | % | 6 | % | 6 | % | ||||||||||||
Orthopedics
|
29,593 | 23 | % | 29,761 | 23 | % | -1 | % | 10 | % | ||||||||||||||
Sports
Medicine
|
24,246 | 19 | % | 23,323 | 18 | % | 4 | % | 5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Vascular
|
4,408 | 3 | % | 5,376 | 4 | % | -19 | % | -13 | % | ||||||||||||||
Other
|
4,599 | 4 | % | 7,114 | 6 | % | -35 | % | -17 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 128,974 | 100 | % | $ | 128,032 | 100 | % | 1 | % | 5 | % |
The
following table presents certain items from our Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Operations as a percent of total net sales for the periods
indicated:
Three
Months Ended
March
31,
|
||||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
(%)
|
(%)
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
100 | 100 | ||||||
Cost
of sales
|
25 | 27 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
75 | 73 | ||||||
Operating
expenses
|
||||||||
Sales
and marketing
|
41 | 39 | ||||||
General
and administrative
|
18 | 17 | ||||||
Research
and development
|
7 | 5 | ||||||
Amortization
of intangible assets
|
1 | 4 | ||||||
Gain
on sale of Pain Care® operations
|
- | (1 | ) | |||||
Total
operating income
|
8 | 9 | ||||||
Net
income
|
2 | 3 |
Three
Months Ended March 31, 2009 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31,
2008
Net sales
increased 1% to $129.0 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared $128.0
million for the same period last year. The impact of foreign currency
decreased sales by $5.1 million during the first quarter of 2009 when compared
to the first quarter of 2008.
Sales
by Business Segment:
Net sales
in Domestic increased to $49.8 million in the first quarter of 2009 compared to
$44.1 million for the same period last year, an increase of
13%. Domestic’s net sales represented 39% and 34% of total net sales
during the first quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in
Domestic’s net sales was partially the result of a 12% increase in sales in our
Spine market sector, which was mainly driven by the increase in sales of our
Spinal-Stim® and Cervical-Stim® products. The increase in Domestic’s
net sales was also attributable to the 16% increase in our Orthopedic market
sector which included a 28% increase in sales of Physio-Stim® products as
compared to the prior year period as well as more than doubled sales growth in
sales of human cellular and tissue based products (“HCT/P products”, often
referred to as Biologic products) used in orthopedic applications when comparing
these same two periods.
Domestic
Sales by Market Sector:
Net
Sales for the
Three
Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||
(US$
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
Growth
|
|||||||||
Spine
|
$ | 37,283 | $ | 33,373 | 12 | % | ||||||
Orthopedics
|
12,514 | 10,754 | 16 | % | ||||||||
Total
|
$ | 49,797 | $ | 44,127 | 13 | % |
Net sales
in Spinal Implants and Biologics decreased $0.3 million to $28.5 million in
the first quarter of 2009 compared to $28.8 million for the same period last
year, a decrease of 1%. Spinal Implants and Biologics’ net sales
represented 22% and 23% of total net sales during the first quarter of 2009 and
2008, respectively. The decrease in sales was primarily related to sales of
Spinal Implants and Biologics’ products through our wholly-owned international
distributor. Sales from our biologics products increased 19% when compared to
the same period in the prior year which was offset by a decrease in product
sales for thoracolumbar and interbody use, where new products are scheduled for
release in the second quarter of 2009. All of Spinal Implants
and Biologics’ sales are recorded in our Spine market sector.
Net sales
in Breg increased $1.0 million to $23.1 million in the first quarter of
2009 compared to $22.1 million for the same period last year, an increase of 5%.
Breg’s net sales represented 18% and 17% of total net sales during first quarter
of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase in Breg’s net sales was
primarily due to a 12% increase in sales of our Breg® bracing products when
compared to the same period in the prior year, primarily as a result of the
sales of our new products which include spine bracing. Further, sales
of our cold therapy products increased 8% over the same period in the prior year
which is due to the recent launch of our new Kodiak® cold therapy
products. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in
sales of our pain therapy products as a result of the sale of operations related
to our Pain Care® line of ambulatory infusion pumps during March
2008. All of Breg’s sales are recorded in our Sports Medicine market
sector.
Net sales
in International decreased 17% to $27.5 million in the first quarter of 2009
compared to $33.0 million for the same period last
year. International’s net sales represented 21% and 26% of our total
net sales in the first quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The impact of
foreign currency decreased International net sales by 16% or $5.1 million,
during the first quarter of 2009 as compared to the first quarter of 2008. On a
constant currency basis, both Orthopedics and Sports Medicine sales in our
International segment increased 7% in the first quarter of 2009 when compared to
the prior year. The Orthopedic segment was primarily driven by
increases in our internal fixation and stimulation product
lines. Sales in our Vascular sector, which consist of the A-V Impulse
System, and sales from our Other distributed products, primarily the Laryngeal
Mask, decreased 13% and 17%, respectively, on a constant currency basis when
compared to the prior year.
International
Sales by Market Sector:
Net
Sales for the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
(US$
in thousands)
|
2009
|
2008
|
Reported
Growth
|
Constant
Currency Growth
|
||||||||||||
Spine
|
$ | 326 | $ | 254 | 28 | % | 30 | % | ||||||||
Orthopedics
|
17,079 | 19,007 | -10 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||
Sports
Medicine
|
1,136 | 1,260 | -10 | % | 7 | % | ||||||||||
Vascular
|
4,408 | 5,376 | -18 | % | -13 | % | ||||||||||
Other
|
4,599 | 7,114 | -35 | % | -17 | % | ||||||||||
Total
|
$ | 27,548 | $ | 33,011 | -17 | % | -1 | % |
Sales
by Market Sector:
Sales of
our Spine products increased to $66.1 million in the first quarter of 2009
compared to $62.5 in the first quarter of 2008. Sales of our
Cervical- Stim® and Spinal-Stim® products increased 12% and 11%, respectively,
in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 2008. These increases were offset by a
1% decrease in sales of Spinal Implants and Biologics’ products from the first
quarter of 2008 as a result of lower sales of Spinal Implants and Biologics’
products through our international distributor. Spine product sales
were 51% and 49% of our total net sales in the first quarters of both 2009 and
2008, respectively.
Sales of
our Orthopedic products remained relatively constant at $29.6 million in the
first quarter of 2009 compared to $29.8 million for the same period last year.
On a constant currency basis, sales increased 10% compared to the same period
last year due to increased sales of our Physio Stim®, external fixation, and
Biologic products. Orthopedic product sales were 23% of our total net sales both
in the first quarter of 2009 and 2008.
Sales of
our Sports Medicine products increased 4% to $24.2 million in the first quarter
of 2009 compared to $23.3 million for the same period last year. As
discussed above, the increase of $0.9 million is primarily due to sales of our
Breg® cold therapy and bracing products, offset by a decrease in our pain
therapy products, which is principally attributable
to the sale of operations relating to our Pain Care® line in March
2008. Sports Medicine product sales were 19% and 18% of our total net
sales in the first quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Sales of
our Vascular products, which consist of our A-V Impulse System®, decreased 18% to $4.4 million
in the first quarter of 2009 compared to $5.4 million for the same period last
year. On a constant currency basis, sales decreased 13% compared to
the prior period due to decreased sales in the United
Kingdom. Vascular product sales were 3% and 4% of our total net sales
in the first quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Sales of
our Other products, which include the sales of our Laryngeal Mask as well as our
Woman’s Care line, decreased 35% to $4.6 million in the first quarter of 2009
when compared to $7.1 million for the same period last year. On a
constant currency basis, sales decreased 17% when compared to the first quarter
of 2008. We distribute the Laryngeal Mask product in the United
Kingdom and in Italy. In June 2010, we will transition out of the
agreement to distribute the Laryngeal Mask product in the United
Kingdom. Other product sales were 4% and 6% of our total net sales in
the first quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively.
Gross Profit - Our gross
profit increased 3% to $96.2 million in the first quarter of 2009, compared to
$93.8 million for the same period last year. Gross profit as a percent of
net sales in the first quarter of 2009 was 74.6% compared to 73.3% in the first
quarter of 2008. The increase in the gross profit is primarily due to
the increased sales of higher margin stimulation products.
Sales and Marketing Expense -
Sales and marketing expense, which includes commissions, certain royalties and
the bad debt provision, generally increase and decrease in relation to
sales. Sales and marketing expense increased $2.1 million, or 4%, to $52.3 million in
the first quarter of 2009 compared to $50.2 million in the first quarter of
2008. As a percent of sales, sales and marketing expense was 40.5%
and 39.2% in the first quarter of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
increase in sales and marketing expense as a percent of sales was due primarily
to an increase in commission expenses reflecting the implementation of sales
programs with new distributor partners. This increase investment in
sales and marketing has facilitated the development of new customer
relationships and increased sales, and has directly contributed to the
improvement in the year-over-year operating profit margin in the Domestic
segment.
General and Administrative
Expense – General and administrative expense increased $0.5 million, or
2%, in the first quarter of 2009 to $22.7 million compared to $22.2 million in
the first quarter of 2008. The increase is
primarily due a restructuring charge to consolidate substantially all of
Blackstone’s current operations in Wayne, NJ and Springfield, MA into the same
facility housing its spine stimulation and US orthopedics business in the
Dallas, TX area. In addition, the Company also incurred legal and
other professional services associated with a proxy contest with one of the
Company’s shareholders. The contest was settled in a special
shareholder meeting on April 2, 2009. As a result, the Company does
not anticipate incurring any further expenses associated with this matter going
forward. General and administrative expense as a percent of sales was 17.6%
in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 17.3% for the same period last
year.
Research and Development
Expense - Research and development expense increased $2.7 million in the
first quarter of 2009 to $9.1 million compared to $6.4 million for the same
period last year. This increase is primarily the result of two collaborative
arrangements: one with Musculoskeletal Transplant Foundation (“MTF”) for which
we incurred approximately $1.8 million in expenses and the other with
Intelligent Implant Systems, LLC (“IIS”) in which we incurred approximately $1.0
million of expenses. As a percent of sales, research and development
expense was 7.0% in the first quarter of 2009 compared to 5.0% for the same
period last year. We expect to incur up to $5.0 million of expense
related to these agreements in 2009; see Liquidity and Capital Resources for
further detail.
Amortization of Intangible
Assets – Amortization of intangible assets decreased $3.4 million in the
first quarter of 2009 to $1.6 million compared to $5.0 million for the same
period last year. This decrease can be primarily attributed to the
impairment of $105.7 million of definite-lived intangible assets at Blackstone
during the third quarter of 2008.
Gain on Sale of Pain Care®
Operations – Gain on sale of Pain Care® operations was $1.6 million in
the first quarter of 2008 and represented the gain on the sale of operations
related to our Pain Care® line of ambulatory infusion pumps during March
2008. No such gain was recorded in the first quarter of
2009.
Interest Expense, net –
Interest expense, net was $6.1 million for the first quarter of 2009 compared to
$5.4 million for the same period last year. Included in interest
expense, net for both the first quarters of 2009 and 2008 was interest expense
of $5.9 million related to the senior secured term loan used to finance the
Blackstone acquisition.
Unrealized Non-cash Gain on Interest
Rate Swap – In June 2008, the Company entered into a three year fully
amortizable interest rate swap agreement (the “Swap”) with a notional amount of
$150.0 million and an expiration date of June 30, 2011. During the
fourth quarter of 2008, the Company incurred an unrealized, non-cash loss of
approximately $8.0 million when it was determined that the Swap was no longer
deemed highly effective. Therefore, cash flow accounting is no longer
applied and mark-to-market adjustments are required to be reported in current
earnings through the expiration of the swap in June 2011. For the
three months ended March 31, 2009, the Company recorded an unrealized non-cash
gain of $0.2 million in other income (expense), net.
Other Income (Expense), net –
Other income (expense), net was expense of $0.3 million for the first
quarter of 2009 compared to income of $0.5 million for the same period last
year. The decrease can be mainly attributed to the effect of foreign
exchange. During the first quarter, we recorded foreign exchange losses of $0.2
million compared with foreign exchange gains of $0.5 for the same period last
year. The decrease is principally as a result of a rapid
strengthening of
the US Dollar against various foreign currencies including the Euro, Pound, Peso
and Brazilian Real.
Several of our foreign subsidiaries hold trade payables or receivables in
currencies (most notably the US Dollar) other than their functional (local)
currency which results in foreign exchange gains or losses when there is
relative movement between those currencies.
Income Tax Expense – Our effective tax rate, which
represents a tax provision as a percentage of income before income taxes was 33%
and 46% during the first quarters of 2009 and 2008, respectively. The
effective tax rate for the first quarter of 2008 included an unfavorable
discrete item resulting from the sale of our Pain Care® operations. Excluding this discrete
item, the effective rate for the first quarter of 2008 was 33%.
Net Income
– Net income for the first
quarter of 2009 was $2.9 million, or $0.17 per basic and diluted share, compared
to net income of $3.6 million, or $0.21 per basic and diluted share, for the
same period last year. The weighted average number of basic common
shares outstanding was 17,103,543 and 17,087,003 during the first quarters of
2009 and 2008, respectively. The weighted average number of diluted common
shares outstanding was 17,121,571 and 17,261,172 during the first quarters of
2009 and 2008, respectively.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Cash and
cash equivalents at March 31, 2009 were $18.0 million, of which $11.2 million
was subject to certain restrictions under the senior secured credit agreement
described below. This compares to cash and cash equivalents of $25.6
million at December 31, 2008, of which $11.0 million was
restricted.
Net cash
provided by operating activities was $11.1 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to $0.9 million for the same period last
year. Net cash provided by operating activities is comprised of net
income, non-cash items (including depreciation and amortization, share-based
compensation, provision for doubtful accounts and gain on the sale of Pain
Care® operations)
and changes in working capital, including changes in restricted
cash. Net income decreased $0.7 million to $2.9 million for the three
months ended March 31, 2009 from net income of $3.6 million for the comparable
period in the prior year. Non-cash items for the three months ended March 31,
2009 increased $3.9
million compared to the same period last year primarily as a result of the gain
on the sale of Pain Care® operations of $1.6
million in the prior year that did not occur this year, and increases in share
based compensation and provision for doubtful accounts of $0.7 million and $0.5
million, respectively. Working capital accounts consumed $2.9 million
of cash in the three months ended March 31, 2009 compared to $10.0 million for
the same period last year. The principal change in working capital
can be mainly attributable to accounts receivable and inventory due to quicker
collections of accounts receivable outstanding and improved inventory purchasing
policies at our Spinal Implants and Biologics business. Overall
performance indicators for our two primary working capital accounts, accounts
receivable and inventory, reflect days sales in receivables of 76 days at March
31, 2009 compared to 82 days at March 31, 2008 and inventory turns of 1.4 times
at March 31, 2009 compared to 1.3 times at March 31, 2008. Also included in the
uses of working capital were $2.3 million in costs related to matters occurring
at Blackstone prior to the acquisition and for which we are seeking
reimbursement from the applicable escrow fund.
Net cash
used in investing activities was $3.5 million during the three months ended
March 31, 2009 compared to $1.9 million provided by investing activities during
the same period last year. During the first quarter of 2009 and 2008,
we invested $3.5 and $4.1 million in capital expenditures,
respectively. During the first quarter of 2008, we sold the
operations of our Pain Care® line of
ambulatory infusion pumps for net proceeds of $6.0 million.
Net cash
used in financing activities was $15.1 million for the three months ended March
31, 2009 compared to $1.2 million for the same period last year. During the
three months ended March 31, 2009, we repaid approximately $12.8 million against
the principal on our senior secured term loan and repaid $1.1 million related to
borrowings by our Italian subsidiary. During the three months ended
March 31, 2008, we repaid $4.5 million against the principal on our senior
secured term loan and borrowed $1.4 million to support working capital in our
Italian subsidiary. During the first quarter of 2009, we used
approximately $1.1 million to purchase an additional 32% minority interest in
our Breg distributor in Germany. In addition, we received proceeds of
$1.9 million from the issuance of 50,052 shares of our common stock upon the
exercise of stock options during the three months ended March 31,
2008.
On
September 22, 2006 the Company’s wholly-owned U.S. holding company subsidiary,
Orthofix Holdings, Inc. (“Orthofix Holdings”), entered into a senior secured
credit facility with a syndicate of financial institutions to finance the
acquisition of Blackstone. Certain terms of the senior secured credit
facility were amended September 29, 2008. The senior secured credit
facility provides for (1) a seven-year amortizing term loan facility of $330.0
million and (2) a six-year revolving credit facility of $45.0 million. As
of March 31, 2009, the Company had no amounts outstanding under the revolving
credit facility and $267.9 million outstanding under the term loan
facility. Obligations under the senior secured credit facility have a
floating interest rate of the London Inter-Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus a
margin, with a LIBOR floor of 3.0% or prime rate plus a margin. Currently,
the term loan is a $150.0 million LIBOR loan plus a margin of 4.50% and $117.9
million prime rate loan plus a margin of 3.50%.
In June
2008, we entered into a three year fully amortizable interest rate swap
agreement (the “Swap”) with a notional amount of $150.0 million and an
expiration date of June 30, 2011. The amount outstanding under the
Swap as of March 31, 2009 was $150.0 million. Under the Swap we will
pay a fixed rate of 3.73% and receive interest at floating rates based on the
three month LIBOR rate at each quarterly re-pricing date until the expiration of
the Swap. As of March 31, 2009 the interest rate on the debt related
to the Swap was 10.0%. Our overall effective interest rate,
including the impact of the Swap, as of March 31, 2009 on our senior secured
debt was 8.6%.
The
credit agreement contains certain financial covenants, including a fixed charge
coverage ratio and a leverage ratio applicable to Orthofix and its subsidiaries
on a consolidated basis. A breach of any of these covenants could result in an
event of default under the credit agreement, which could permit acceleration of
the debt payments under the facility. Management believes the Company
was in compliance with these financial covenants as measured at March 31,
2009. Our leverage and fixed charge ratios, as defined in the senior
secured credit facility, were 3.53 and 1.38, respectively, at March 31,
2009. The Company further believes that it should be able to meet
these financial covenants in future fiscal quarters, however, there can be no
assurance that it will be able to do so, and failure to do so could result in an
event of default under the credit agreement, which could have a material adverse
effect on our financial position.
Each of
the domestic subsidiaries of the Company (which includes Orthofix Inc., Breg
Inc., and Blackstone) and Colgate Medical Limited and Victory Medical Limited
(wholly-owned financing subsidiaries of the Company) have guaranteed the
obligations of Orthofix Holdings under the senior secured credit
facility. The obligations of the subsidiaries under their guarantees
are secured by the pledges of their respective assets.
At March
31, 2009, we had outstanding borrowings of $0.7 million and unused available
lines of credit of approximately 6.8 million Euro ($9.0 million) under a line of
credit established in Italy to finance the working capital of our Italian
operations. The terms of the line of credit give us the option to borrow amounts
in Italy at rates determined at the time of borrowing.
On July
24, 2008, we entered into an agreement with Musculoskeletal Transplant
Foundation (“MTF”) to collaborate on the development and commercialization of a
new stem cell-based bone growth biologic matrix. Under the terms of
the agreement, we will invest up to $10.0 million in the development of the new
stem cell-based bone growth biologic matrix that will be designed to provide the
beneficial properties of an autograft in spinal and orthopedic
surgeries. After the completion of the development process, the
Company and MTF will operate under the terms of a separate commercialization
agreement. Under the terms of this 10-year agreement, MTF
will source the tissue, process it to create the bone growth matrix, and
package and deliver it in accordance with orders received directly from
customers and from the Company. The Company will have exclusive
global marketing rights for the new allograft and will receive a marketing fee
from MTF based on total sales. We account for this collaborative
arrangement under guidance included in Emerging Issues Task Force Issue
No. 07-1 “Accounting for Collaborative Arrangements.” We
currently plan for the new matrix to be launched in the U.S. during 2009.
Approximately $1.8 million of expenses incurred under the terms of the agreement
are included in research and development expense in the three months ended March
31, 2009.
As
previously announced, we have also entered into an agreement with Intelligent
Implant Systems (“IIS”) for the acquisition and development of a next-generation
pedicle screw system for our spinal implants division. Under the agreement
we purchased $2.5 million of intellectual property and related technology.
In addition, during the first quarter of 2009, IIS met their first
development milestone and under the terms of the agreement the Company paid IIS
$1.0 million. The Company has recorded this as research and development
expense in the three months ended March 31, 2009. IIS will continue to
perform research and development functions related to the technology and under
the agreement, we will pay IIS an additional amount up to $3.5 million for
research and development performance milestones.
We
believe that current cash balances together with projected cash flows from
operating activities, the unused availability of the $45.0 million revolving
credit facility, the available Italian line of credit, and our debt capacity are
sufficient to cover anticipated working capital and capital expenditure needs
including research and development costs and research and development projects
formerly mentioned, over the near term.
Item
3. Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
We are
exposed to certain market risks as part of our ongoing business
operations. Primary exposures include changes in interest rates and
foreign currency fluctuations. These exposures can vary sales, cost of sales,
costs of operations, and the cost of financing and yields on cash and short-term
investments. We use derivative financial instruments, where appropriate,
to manage these risks. However, our risk management policy does not
allow us to hedge positions we do not hold nor do we enter into derivative or
other financial investments for trading or speculative purposes. As of
March 31, 2009, we had a currency swap in place to minimize foreign currency
exchange risk related to a 38.3 million Euro intercompany note foreign
currency exposure.
We are
exposed to interest rate risk in connection with our senior secured term loan
and borrowings under our revolving credit facility, which bear interest at
floating rates based on LIBOR or the prime rate plus an applicable borrowing
margin. Therefore, interest rate changes generally do not affect the fair market
value of the debt, but do impact future earnings and cash flows, assuming other
factors are held constant. We had an interest rate swap in
place as of March 31, 2009 to minimize interest rate risk related to our
LIBOR-based borrowings.
As of
March 31, 2009, we had $267.9 million of variable rate term debt
represented by borrowings under our senior secured term loan at a floating
interest rate of LIBOR plus a margin, with a LIBOR floor of 3.0% or the prime
rate plus a margin. Currently, the term loan is a $150.0 million LIBOR loan
plus a margin of 4.50% and a $117.9 million prime rate loan plus a margin of
3.5%, which are adjusted based upon the credit rating of the Company and its
subsidiaries. In June 2008, we entered into a Swap with a notional
amount of $150.0 million and an expiration date of June 30, 2011. The
amount outstanding under the Swap as of March 31, 2009 was $150.0
million. Under the Swap we will pay a fixed rate of 3.73% and receive
interest at floating rates based on the three month LIBOR rate at each quarterly
re-pricing date until the expiration of the Swap. As of March 31,
2009 the interest rate on the debt related to the Swap was 10.0%. Our overall
effective interest rate, including the impact of the Swap, as of March 31, 2009
on our senior secured debt was 8.6%. Based on the balance outstanding under the
senior secured term loan combined with the Swap as of March 31, 2009, an
immediate change of one percentage point in the applicable interest rate on the
variable rate debt would cause a change in interest expense of approximately
$0.7 million on an annual basis.
Our
foreign currency exposure results from fluctuating currency exchange rates,
primarily the U.S. Dollar against the Euro, Great Britain Pound, Mexican Peso
and Brazilian Real. We are subject to cost of goods currency exposure when
we produce products in foreign currencies such as the Euro or Great Britain
Pound and sell those products in U.S. Dollars. We are subject to
transactional currency exposures when foreign subsidiaries (or the Company
itself) enter into transactions denominated in a currency other than their
functional currency. As of March 31, 2009, we had an unhedged intercompany
receivable denominated in Euro for approximately $28.8 million. We
recorded a foreign currency loss during the first quarter of 2009 of $1.5
million, which resulted from the weakening of the Euro against the U.S. dollar
during the period.
We also
are subject to currency exposure from translating the results of our global
operations into the U.S. dollar at exchange rates that have fluctuated from the
beginning of the period. The U.S. dollar equivalent of international
sales denominated in foreign currencies was favorably impacted during
the three months ended March 31, 2009 and 2008 by foreign currency exchange rate
fluctuations with the weakening of the U.S dollar against the local foreign
currency during these periods. The U.S. dollar equivalent of the
related costs denominated in these foreign currencies was unfavorably
impacted during these periods. As we continue to distribute and
manufacture our products in selected foreign countries, we expect that future
sales and costs associated with our activities in these markets will continue to
be denominated in the applicable foreign currencies, which could cause currency
fluctuations to materially impact our operating results.
Item
4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures
Under the
supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Chief
Executive Officer and our Chief Financial Officer, we performed an evaluation of
the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a - 15(e) or 15d – 15 (e)) as of
the end of the period covered by this report. Based upon that evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that, as of
the end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and
procedures were effective.
Changes
in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
have not been any changes in our internal control over financial reporting
during the fiscal quarter ended March 31, 2009 that have materially affected or
are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial
reporting.
PART
II
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Item
1. Legal Proceedings
On or
about July 23, 2007, our subsidiary, Blackstone received a subpoena issued
by the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General,
under the authority of the federal healthcare anti-kickback and false claims
statutes. The subpoena seeks documents for the period January 1, 2000
through July 31, 2006, which is prior to Blackstone’s acquisition by the
Company. The Company believes that the subpoena concerns the
compensation of physician consultants and related matters. On
September 17, 2007, the Company submitted a claim for indemnification from the
escrow fund established in connection with the agreement and plan of merger
between the Company, New Era Medical Corp. and Blackstone, dated as of
August 4, 2006 (the “Blackstone Merger Agreement”), for any losses to us
resulting from this matter. The Company was subsequently notified by
legal counsel for the former shareholders that the representative of the former
shareholders of Blackstone has objected to the indemnification claim and intends
to contest it in accordance with the terms of the Blackstone Merger
Agreement.
On or
about January 7, 2008, the Company received a federal grand jury subpoena from
the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of
Massachusetts. The subpoena seeks documents from the Company for the
period January 1, 2000 through July 15, 2007. The Company believes
that the subpoena concerns the compensation of physician consultants and related
matters, and further believes that it is associated with the Department of
Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General’s investigation of such
matters. On September 18, 2008, the Company submitted a claim
for indemnification from the escrow fund established in connection with the
Blackstone Merger Agreement for any losses to the Company resulting from
this matter. On or about April 29, 2009, counsel for the Company
received a HIPAA subpoena issued by the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the District
of Massachusetts. The subpoena seeks documents from the Company for
the period January 1, 2000 through July 15, 2007. The Company
believes that the subpoena concerns the compensation of physician consultants
and related matters, and further believes that it is associated with the
Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General’s
investigation of such matters, as well as the January 7, 2008 federal grand jury
subpoena.
On or
about December 5, 2008, the Company obtained a copy of a qui tam complaint filed
by Susan Hutcheson and Philip Brown against Blackstone and the Company in the
U.S. District Court for the District of Massachusetts. A qui tam
action is a civil lawsuit brought by an individual for an alleged violation of a
federal statute, in which the U.S. Department of Justice has the right to
intervene and take over the prosecution of the lawsuit at its
option. On November 21, 2008, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a
notice of non-intervention in the case. The complaint was served on
Blackstone on or about March 24, 2009 and counsel for the Company subsequently
agreed to accept service on Orthofix’s behalf. The complaint alleges
a cause of action under the False Claims Act for alleged inappropriate payments
and other items of value conferred on physician consultants, as well as a cause
of action for retaliation and wrongful discharge. The Company
believes that this lawsuit is related to the matters described above involving
the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of the Inspector General,
and the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of
Massachusetts. The Company intends to defend vigorously against this
lawsuit. On September 18, 2008, after being informed of the existence
of the lawsuit by representatives of the U.S. Department of Justice and prior to
the unsealing of the complaint (which was unsealed by the court on or about
November 24, 2008), the Company submitted a claim for indemnification from
the escrow fund established in connection with the Blackstone Merger
Agreement for any losses to us resulting from this matter.
On or
about September 27, 2007, Blackstone received a federal grand jury subpoena
issued by the United States Attorney’s Office for the District of Nevada
(“USAO-Nevada subpoena”). The subpoena seeks documents for the period from
January 1999 to the date of issuance of the subpoena. The Company believes that
the subpoena concerns payments or gifts made by Blackstone to certain
physicians. On February 29, 2008, Blackstone received a Civil
Investigative Demand (“CID”) from the Massachusetts Attorney General’s Office,
Public Protection and Advocacy Bureau, Healthcare Division. The
Company believes that the CID seeks documents concerning Blackstone’s financial
relationships with certain physicians and related matters for the period from
March 2004 through the date of issuance of the CID. The Ohio Attorney General’s
Office, Health Care Fraud Section has issued a criminal subpoena, dated August
8, 2008, to Orthofix, Inc. (the “Ohio AG subpoena”). The Ohio AG
subpoena seeks documents for the period from January 1, 2000 through the date of
issuance of the subpoena. The Company believes that the Ohio AG
subpoena arises from a government investigation that concerns the compensation
of physician consultants and related matters. On September 18, 2008,
the Company submitted a claim for indemnification from the escrow fund
established in connection with the Blackstone Merger Agreement for any
losses to us resulting from the USAO-Nevada subpoena, the Massachusetts CID and
the Ohio AG subpoena.
By order
entered on January 4, 2007, the United States District Court for the Eastern
District of Arkansas unsealed a qui tam complaint captioned Thomas v. Chan, et
al., 4:06-cv-00465-JLH, filed against Dr. Patrick Chan, Blackstone and other
defendants including another device manufacturer. The complaint
alleges causes of action under the False Claims Act for alleged
inappropriate payments and other items of value conferred on Dr.
Chan. The Company believes that Blackstone has meritorious defenses
to the claims alleged and the Company intends to defend vigorously against this
lawsuit. On September 17, 2007, the Company submitted a claim for
indemnification from the escrow fund established in connection with
the Blackstone Merger Agreement for any losses to us resulting from this
matter. The Company was subsequently notified by legal counsel for
the former shareholders that the representative of the former shareholders of
Blackstone has objected to the indemnification claim and intends to contest it
in accordance with the terms of the Blackstone Merger Agreement.
The
Company is unable to predict the outcome of each of the escrow claims described
above in the preceding paragraphs or to estimate the amount, if any, that may
ultimately be returned to the Company from the escrow fund and there can be no
assurance that losses to us from these matters will not exceed the amount of the
escrow account. As of March 31, 2009 and December 31, 2008, included
in Prepaid expenses and other current assets is approximately $10.3 million and
$8.3 million of escrow receivable balances related to the Blackstone matters
described above, respectively.
In
addition to the foregoing claims, the Company has submitted claims for
indemnification from the escrow fund established in connection with the
Blackstone Merger Agreement for losses that have or may result from certain
civil actions filed against Blackstone as well as certain claims against
Blackstone alleging rights to payments for Blackstone stock options not
reflected in Blackstone's corporate ledger at the time of Blackstone's
acquisition by the Company, or that the shares or stock options subject to those
claims were improperly diluted by Blackstone. To date, the representative
of the former shareholders of Blackstone has not objected
to approximately $1.5 million in such claims from the escrow fund,
with certain claims remaining pending.
On or
about April 10, 2009, the Company received a HIPAA subpoena
(“HIPAA subpoena”) issued by the U.S. Attorney's Office for the District of
Massachusetts. The subpoena seeks documents for the period January
1, 1995 through the date of the subpoena. The Company
believes that the subpoena concerns the classification and marketing of its
bone growth stimulators and related matters. The Company intends
to cooperate with the government's requests. The Company is unable to predict
what actions, if any, might be taken by the government or what impact, if
any, the outcome of this matter might have on the Company’s consolidated
financial position, results of operations or cash flows.
On or
about April 14, 2009, the Company obtained a copy of a qui tam complaint filed
by Jeffrey J. Bierman in the U.S. District Court for the District of
Massachusetts against Orthofix, Inc., the Company, and other companies that have
allegedly manufactured bone growth stimulation devices, including Orthologic
Corp., DJO Incorporated, Reable Therapeutics, Inc., the Blackstone Group, L.P.,
Biomet, Inc., EBI, L.P., EBI Holdings, Inc., EBI Medical Systems, Inc.,
Bioelectron, Inc., LBV Acquisition, Inc., and Smith & Nephew, Inc. By order entered on
March 24, 2009, the court unsealed the case. The amended complaint
alleges various causes of action under the federal False Claims Act and state
and city false claims acts premised on the contention that the defendants
improperly promote the sale, as opposed to the rental, of bone growth
stimulation devices. The amended complaint also includes claims
against the defendants for, among other things, allegedly misleading physicians
and purportedly causing them to file false claims and for allegedly violating
the Anti-kickback Act by providing free products to physicians, waiving
patients’ insurance co-payments, and providing inducements to independent sales
agents to generate business. The Company believes that this lawsuit
is related to the matter described above involving the HIPAA
subpoena. To the best of the Company’s knowledge, the plaintiff has
not served either Orthofix, Inc. or the Company. If served, the
Company intends to defend vigorously against this lawsuit.
Effective
October 29, 2007, Blackstone, entered into a settlement agreement of a patent
infringement lawsuit brought by certain affiliates of Medtronic Sofamor Danek
USA Inc. In that lawsuit, the Medtronic plaintiffs had alleged that they were
the exclusive licensees of certain US patents and that Blackstone's making,
selling, offering for sale, and using its Blackstone Anterior Cervical Plate, 3º
Anterior Cervical Plate, Hallmark Anterior Cervical Plate and Construx Mini PEEK
VBR System products within the United States willfully infringed the subject
patents. Blackstone denied infringement and asserted that the Patents were
invalid. The settlement agreement is not expected to have a material
impact on the Company’s consolidated financial position, results of operations
or cash flows. On July 20, 2007, the Company submitted a claim
for indemnification from the escrow fund established in connection with
the Blackstone Merger Agreement for any losses to us resulting from this
matter. The Company was subsequently notified by legal counsel for
the former shareholders that the representative of the former shareholders of
Blackstone has objected to the indemnification claim and intends to contest it
in accordance with the terms of the Blackstone Merger Agreement.
The
Company cannot predict the outcome of any proceedings or claims made against the
Company or its subsidiaries described in the preceding paragraphs and there can
be no assurance that the ultimate resolution of any claim will not have a
material adverse impact on our consolidated financial position, results of
operations, or cash flows.
In
addition to the foregoing, in the normal course of our business, the
Company is involved in various lawsuits from time to time and may be
subject to certain other contingencies.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes to our risk factors from the factors discussed in
Part I, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal
year ended December 31, 2008.
Item
4. Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
A Special
General Meeting of Shareholders (the “Special Meeting”) of the Company took
place on April 2, 2009. The Special Meeting was called by resolution
of the Board of Directors of the Company as a result of the delivery to the
Company by Ramius Value and Opportunity Master Fund Ltd. (collectively with its
affiliates, “Ramius”), of written requests to call a special general meeting of
shareholders of the Company. The purpose of the Special Meeting was
to consider the proposals that were described in Ramius’ Solicitation Statement
to Request a Special General Meeting of Shareholders, dated January 7, 2009 and
supplemented on January 22, 2009. The Ramius proposals sought (i) to
remove four incumbent members of the Company’s Board of Directors, (ii) to
remove any director appointed by the Board without shareholder approval from
December 10, 2008 through and including the date of the Special Meeting and
(iii) to elect certain Ramius nominees, in the event that one or more incumbent
directors were removed pursuant to the first proposal.
The total
number of common shares eligible to vote as of the record date, February 25,
2009, was 17,103,142. At the Special Meeting, the holders of
14,801,554 shares of the Company’s common stock were represented in person or by
proxy, representing 86.5% of the total shares eligible to vote, and constituting
a quorum.
At the
Special Meeting, the Company collected ballots on three proposals, which are
described below.
Proposal
1
The first
proposal was a Ramius proposal to remove, without cause, the following four
directors of the Company – James F. Gero, Peter J. Hewett, Thomas J. Kester and
Walter P. von Wartburg was as follows:
For
Removal
|
Against
Removal
|
Abstain
|
|
James
F. Gero
|
5,265,920
|
8,950,320
|
585,314
|
Peter
J. Hewett
|
6,147,303
|
8,068,007
|
586,244
|
Thomas
J. Kester
|
2,461,385
|
12,273,605
|
66,564
|
Walter
P. von Wartburg
|
5,176,720
|
9,554,247
|
70,587
|
As a
result of the foregoing vote by shareholders, no directors were removed and
proposal 1 failed with respect to each of the foregoing directors.
Proposal
2
The
Company also collected ballots on a Ramius proposal to remove, without cause,
any director appointed by the Company’s Board of Directors without shareholder
approval from December 10, 2008 through and including the date of the Special
General Meeting was as follows:
For
Removal
|
Against
Removal
|
Abstain
|
|
6,355,384
|
8,369,430
|
76,740
|
The
Company did not appoint any director during the period beginning on December 10,
2008 through and including the date of the meeting, and so the results of this
proposal had no substantive effect. Nevertheless, as a result of the
foregoing vote by shareholders, this proposal failed.
Proposal
3
Lastly,
the Company collected ballots on a Ramius proposal to elect the following four
nominees – J. Michael Egan, Peter A. Feld, Steven J. Lee and Charles T. Orsatti
to fill any vacancies on the Board of Directors that would be created if the
first proposal had been successful. The results of the vote on this
proposal were as follows:
For
|
Withhold
|
|
J.
Michael Egan
|
5,840,605
|
8,960,949
|
Peter
A. Feld
|
5,198,838
|
9,602,716
|
Steven
J. Lee
|
1,899,499
|
12,902,055
|
Charles
T. Orsatti
|
6,288,433
|
8,513,121
|
However,
because no directors were removed as a result of the first proposal, this
proposal did not have effect and no new directors were elected at the
meeting.
Item 6. Exhibits
|
(a)
|
Exhibits
|
Exhibit
Number
|
Description
|
|
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s
annual report on Form 20-F dated June 29, 2001 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
3.2
|
Articles
of Association of the Company as amended (filed as an exhibit to the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30,
2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.1
|
Orthofix
International N.V. Amended and Restated Stock Purchase Plan (filed as an
exhibit to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter
ended June 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.2
|
Orthofix
International N.V. Staff Share Option Plan, as amended through April 22,
2003 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.3
|
Orthofix
International N.V. Amended and Restated 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan
(filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed
June 26, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.4
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Orthofix International N.V. Amended and Restated 2004
Long-Term Incentive Plan (filed as an exhibit to the Company's current
report on Form 8-K filed June 20, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.5
|
Form
of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Orthofix International
N.V. Amended and Restated 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan (vesting over 3
years) (filed as an exhibit to the Company's current report on Form 8-K
filed June 20, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.6
|
Form
of Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement under the Orthofix International
N.V. Amended and Restated 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan (3 year cliff
vesting) (filed as an exhibit to the Company's current report on Form 8-K
filed June 20, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.7
|
Form
of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement under the Orthofix International N.V.
Amended and Restated 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan (vesting over 3 years)
(filed as an exhibit to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed
June 20, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.8
|
Form
of Restricted Stock Grant Agreement under the Orthofix International N.V.
Amended and Restated 2004 Long Term Incentive Plan (3 year cliff vesting)
(filed as an exhibit to the Company's current report on Form 8-K filed
June 20, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.9
|
Amended
and Restated Orthofix Deferred Compensation Plan (filed as an exhibit to
the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed January 7, 2009, and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.10
|
Acquisition
Agreement dated as of November 20, 2003, among Orthofix International
N.V., Trevor Acquisition, Inc., Breg, Inc. and Bradley R. Mason, as
shareholders’ representative (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current
report on Form 8-K filed January 8, 2004 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.11
|
Amended
and Restated Voting and Subscription Agreement dated as of December 22,
2003, among Orthofix International N.V. and the significant shareholders
of Breg, Inc. identified on the signature pages thereto (filed as an
exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed on January 8,
2004 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.12
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement dated December 29, 2005 between Orthofix Inc. and
Charles W. Federico (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report
on Form 8-K filed December 30, 2005 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.13
|
Form
of Indemnity Agreement (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s annual report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
10.14
|
Settlement
Agreement dated February 23, 2006, between Intavent Orthofix Limited, a
wholly-owed subsidiary of Orthofix International N.V. and Galvin Mould
(filed as an exhibit to the Company’s annual report on Form 8-K filed on
April 17, 2006 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.15
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 6, 2007, between
Orthofix Inc. and Alan W. Milinazzo (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s
annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as
amended, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.16
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 6, 2007,
between Orthofix Inc. and Raymond C. Kolls (filed as an exhibit to the
Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2007, as amended, and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.17
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement, dated December 6, 2007, between
Orthofix Inc. and Michael M. Finegan. (filed as an exhibit to the
Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2007, as amended, and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.18
|
Credit
Agreement, dated as of September 22, 2006, among Orthofix Holdings, Inc.,
Orthofix International N.V., certain domestic subsidiaries of Orthofix
International N.V., Colgate Medical Limited, Victory Medical Limited,
Swiftsure Medical Limited, Orthofix UK Ltd, the several banks and other
financial institutions as may from time to time become parties thereunder,
and Wachovia Bank, National Association (filed as an exhibit to the
Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed September 27, 2006 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.19
|
First
Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated September 29, 2008, by and among
Orthofix Holdings, Inc., Orthofix International N.V., certain domestic
subsidiaries of Orthofix International N.V., Colgate Medical Limited,
Victory Medical Limited, Swiftsure Medical Limited, Orthofix UK Ltd, and
Wachovia Bank, National Association, as administrative agent on behalf of
the Lenders under the Credit Agreement (filed as an exhibit to the
Company’s current report on Form 8-K filed September 29, 2008 and
incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.20
|
Agreement
and Plan of Merger, dated as of August 4, 2006, among Orthofix
International N.V., Orthofix Holdings, Inc., New Era Medical Limited,
Blackstone Medical, Inc. and William G. Lyons, III, as Equityholders’
Representative (filed as an exhibit to the Company's current report on
Form 8-K filed August 7, 2006 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.21
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of September 22, 2006, between Blackstone Medical,
Inc. and Matthew V. Lyons (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2006, as
amended, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.22
|
Amended
and Restated Employment Agreement dated December 6, 2007 between Orthofix
Inc. and Timothy M. Adams (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s annual
report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as
amended, and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.23
|
Nonqualified
Stock Option Agreement between Timothy M. Adams and Orthofix International
N.V. dated November 19, 2007 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current
report on Form 8-K filed November 21, 2007 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.24
|
Employment
Agreement between Orthofix Inc. and Scott Dodson, dated as of December 10,
2007 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as amended, and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
10.25
|
Employment
Agreement between Orthofix Inc. and Michael Simpson, dated as of December
6, 2007 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s annual report on Form 10-K
for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007, as amended, and incorporated
herein by reference).
|
|
Description
of Director Fee Policy.
|
||
Summary
of Orthofix International N.V. Annual Incentive
Program.
|
||
10.28
|
Employment
Agreement between Orthofix Inc. and Thomas Hein dated as of April 11, 2008
(filed as an exhibit to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended March 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.29
|
Nonqualified
Stock Option Agreement under the Orthofix International N.V. Amended and
Restated 2004 Long-Term Incentive Plan, dated April 11, 2008, between
Orthofix International N.V. and Thomas Hein (filed as an exhibit to the
Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended March 31,
2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.30
|
Summary
of Consulting Arrangement between Orthofix International N.V. and Peter
Hewett (filed as an exhibit to the Company's quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended March 31, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.31
|
Employment
Agreement between Orthofix Inc. and Denise E. Pedulla dated as of June 9,
2008 (filed as an exhibit to the company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.32
|
Form
of Inducement Grant Nonqualified Stock Option Agreement between Orthofix
International N.V. and Robert S. Vaters (filed as an exhibit to the
current report on Form 8-K of Orthofix International N.V dated September
10, 2008 and incorporated herein by reference).
|
|
10.33
|
Employment
Agreement between Orthofix Inc. and Robert S. Vaters effective September
7, 2008 (filed as an exhibit to the company’s current report on Form 8-K
filed September 10, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
10.34
|
Offer
Letter from Orthofix International N.V. to Robert S. Vaters dated
September 5, 2008 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on
Form 8-K filed September 10, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.35+
|
Letter
Agreement between Orthofix Inc. and Oliver Burckhardt dated August 28,
2008 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.36
|
Notice
of Termination from Orthofix Inc. to Oliver Burckhardt dated August 27,
2008 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s quarterly report on Form 10-Q
for the quarter ended September 30, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.37
|
Employment
Agreement between Orthofix Inc. and Bradley R. Mason dated October 14,
2008 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K
filed October 15, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.38
|
Second
Amended and Restated Performance Accelerated Stock Options Agreement
between Orthofix International N.V. and Bradley R. Mason dated October 14,
2008 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current report on Form 8-K
filed October 15, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
10.39
|
Nonqualified
Stock Option Agreement between Orthofix International N.V. and Bradley R.
Mason dated October 14, 2008 (filed as an exhibit to the Company’s current
report on Form 8-K filed October 15, 2008 and incorporated herein by
reference).
|
|
21.1
|
List
of Subsidiaries.
|
|
23.1
|
Consent
of Ernst & Young LLP.
|
|
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive
Officer.
|
||
Rule
13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial
Officer.
|
||
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
|
||
Section
1350 Certification of Chief Financial
Officer.
|
* Filed
herewith.
+ Certain
confidential portions of this exhibit were omitted by means of redacting a
portion of the text. This exhibit has been filed separately with the
Secretary of the Commission without redactions pursuant to our Application
Requesting Confidential Treatment under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934.
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto
duly authorized.
ORTHOFIX
INTERNATIONAL N.V.
|
||
Date: May
7, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Alan W. Milinazzo
|
Name: Alan
W. Milinazzo
|
||
Title: Chief
Executive Officer and President
|
||
Date: May
7, 2009
|
By:
|
/s/ Robert S.Vaters
|
Name: Robert
S.Vaters
|
||
Title: Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer
|
38