OWC Pharmaceutical Research Corp. - Quarter Report: 2014 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
___________________
FORM 10-Q
___________________
ý QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2014
Commission file number 0-54856
DYNAMIC
APPLICATIONS CORP.
(Exact Name Of Registrant
As Specified In Its Charter)
Delaware | 98-0573566 |
(State of Incorporation) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
c/o Eli Gonen, 14 Menachem Begin Street, Ramat Gan, Israel | 52700 |
(Address of Principal Executive Offices) | (ZIP Code) |
Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code: (972) 3-7523922
Indicate by check
mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13
or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for
such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as
defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act) or a smaller reporting company .
Large accelerated filer ¨ | Accelerated filer ¨ | Non-Accelerated filer ¨ | Smaller reporting company x |
On July 29, 2014, the Registrant had 54,917,668 shares of common stock outstanding.
Item |
Description |
Page |
|||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION |
|||||
ITEM 1. | FINANCIAL STATEMENTS - UNAUDITED. | 3 | |||
Balance Sheets | 4 | ||||
Statements of Operations | 5 | ||||
Statements of Cash Flows | 6 | ||||
Notes to Financial Statements | 7 | ||||
ITEM 2. | MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS. | 8 | |||
ITEM 3. | QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK. | 10 | |||
ITEM 4. | CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES. | 10 | |||
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION |
|||||
ITEM 1. | LEGAL PROCEEDINGS. | 11 | |||
ITEM 1A. | RISK FACTORS. | 11 | |||
ITEM 2. | UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS. | 11 | |||
ITEM 3. | DEFAULT UPON SENIOR SECURITIES. | 11 | |||
ITEM 4. | MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE. | 11 | |||
ITEM 5. | OTHER INFORMATION. | 11 | |||
ITEM 6. | EXHIBITS. | 11 |
PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS Back to Table of Contents
Dynamic Applications Corp. | ||||
(A Development Stage Company) | ||||
Balance Sheets | ||||
Back to Table of Contents | ||||
June 30, 2014 | ||||
(Unaudited) | December 31, 2013 |
|||
ASSETS |
||||
Current assets: | ||||
Cash | $ | 846,557 | $ | 2,469 |
Total current assets | 846,557 | 2,469 | ||
Total Assets | $ | 846,557 | $ | 2,469 |
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY (DEFICIT) |
||||
Current liabilities: | ||||
Accrued expenses | $ | 4,000 | $ | 4,000 |
Accrued interest | 351 | 13,863 | ||
Advances payable to related parties | 28,436 | 28,436 | ||
Notes payable | 14,500 | - | ||
Convertible notes payable, net of discount (in default as of June 30, 2014) | 1,500 | 81,880 | ||
Total current liabilities | 48,787 | 128,179 | ||
Total liabilities | 48,787 | 128,179 | ||
Stockholders' equity (deficit): | ||||
Preferred stock, $0.00001 par value; 20,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued and outstanding | - | - | ||
Common stock, $0.00001 par value; 500,000,000 shares authorized; and | ||||
54,917,668 and 21,641,450 issued and outstanding at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively | 550 | 217 | ||
Additional paid in capital | 2,022,594 | 697,278 | ||
Deficit accumulated during development stage | (1,225,374) | (823,205) | ||
Total stockholders' equity (deficit) | 797,770 | (125,710) | ||
Total Liabilities and Stockholders' Equity | $ | 846,557 | $ |
2,469 |
See notes to unaudited interim financial statements. |
Dynamic Applications Corp. | ||||||||||
(A Development Stage Company) | ||||||||||
Statements of Operations | ||||||||||
For the Three and Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and From Inception (March 7, 2008) to June 30, 2014 | ||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
Back to Table of Contents | ||||||||||
For the period from |
||||||||||
For the three |
For the three |
For the six |
For the six |
Inception |
||||||
Months ended |
Months ended |
Months ended |
Months ended |
(March 7, 2008) |
||||||
June 30, 2014 |
June 30, 2013 |
June 30, 2014 |
June 30, 2013 |
to June 30, 2014 |
||||||
Revenues |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
$ |
- |
Expenses | ||||||||||
General and administrative | (106,930) |
149,312 |
365,212 |
208,502 |
991,503 |
|||||
Research and development | - |
- |
- |
- |
45,000 |
|||||
(Loss) from operations | 106,930 | (149,312) | (365,212) | (208,502) | (1,036,503) | |||||
Other income (expense): | ||||||||||
Loss on foreign currency transactions | - | - | - | - | (5,014) | |||||
Interest expense | (86) | (3,872) | (2,923) | (6,688) | (28,320) | |||||
Amortization of debt discount | 0 | (17,152) | (34,034) | (26,007) | (155,537) | |||||
Total other income (expense) | (86) |
(21,024) |
(36,957) |
(32,695) |
(188,871) |
|||||
Total costs and expenses | 106,844 | (170,336) | (402,169) | (241,197) | (1,225,374) | |||||
Net loss before income taxes | 106,844 | (170,336) | (402,169) | (241,197) | (1,225,374) | |||||
Income tax | - |
- |
- |
- |
- |
|||||
Net loss | $ |
106,844 |
$ |
(170,336) |
$ |
(402,169) |
$ |
(241,197) |
$ |
(1,225,374) |
Basic and diluted per share amounts: | ||||||||||
Basic and diluted net loss | $ |
0.00 |
$ |
(0.01) |
$ |
(0.01) |
$ | (0.01) |
||
Weighted average shares outstanding | ||||||||||
(basic and diluted) | 47,666,243 |
16,718,813 |
$ |
38,562,849 |
$ | 16,276,588 |
||||
See notes to unaudited interim financial statements. |
Dynamic Applications Corp. |
||||||||||
(A Development Stage Company) |
||||||||||
For the Six-Month Periods Ended June 30, 2014 and 2013 and From Inception (March 7, 2008) to June 30, 2014 |
||||||||||
(Unaudited) | ||||||||||
For the six |
For the six |
For the period from | ||||||||
Months ended |
Months ended |
Inception (March 7, 2008) | ||||||||
June 30, 2014 |
June 30, 2013 |
to June 30, 2014 | ||||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||||
Net loss | $ |
(402,196) |
$ |
(241,197) |
$ |
(1,225,374) |
||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities: | ||||||||||
Amortization of debt discount | 34,034 | 26,007 | 155,537 | |||||||
Common stock issued for services | 326,000 | 28,000 | 369,000 | |||||||
Fair value of warrants issued for services | - | 107,074 | 107,074 | |||||||
Changes in net assets and liabilities: | ||||||||||
Increase (decrease) in accounts payable and accrued liabilities | 2,923 |
11,149 |
32,782 |
|||||||
Cash used in operating activities | (39,212) |
(68,967) |
(560,981) |
|||||||
Cash flow from financing activities: | ||||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock | 868,800 | 55 | 1,208,688 | |||||||
Proceeds of debt borrowings | 14,500 | 77,614 | 170,414 | |||||||
Related party advances | - | - | 28,436 | |||||||
Cash provided by financing activities | 883,300 |
77,669 |
1,407,538 |
|||||||
Change in cash | 844,088 |
8,702 |
846,557 |
|||||||
Cash - beginning of period | 2,469 |
8,101 |
- |
|||||||
Cash - end of period | $ |
846,557 |
$ |
16,803 |
$ |
846,557 |
||||
Supplement cash flow information: | ||||||||||
Non-cash transactions: | ||||||||||
Debt discount arising from beneficial conversion feature | $ | - | $ | 77,614 | $ | 155,914 | ||||
Debt and accrued interest converted to equity | $ | 130,849 | $ | 51,568 | $ | 182,469 | ||||
See notes to unaudited interim financial statements. |
DYNAMIC APPLICATIONS CORP.
Notes to Unaudited Interim
Financial Statements
Back to
Table of Contents
1. The Company and Significant Accounting Policies
Organizational
Background: Dynamic Applications Corp. ("Dynamic Applications" or the
"Company") is a Delaware corporation in the development stage and has not
commenced operations. The Company was incorporated under the laws of the
State of Delaware on March 7, 2008. The business plan of the Company is to
develop a commercial application of the design in a patent of a
"Electromagnetic percussion device" which is a device intended to provide an
electromagnetic percussion hammer. The Company also intends to enhance the
existing prototype, obtain approval of its patent application, and
manufacture and market the product and/or seek third party entities
interested in licensing the rights to manufacture and market the device. The
accompanying financial statements of Dynamic Applications were prepared from
the accounts of the Company under the accrual basis of accounting.
Basis of Presentation: The accompanying financial statements have been
prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a
going concern. The Company has not established any source of revenue to
cover its operating costs, and as such, has incurred an operating loss since
inception. Further, as of June 30, 2014, the cash resources of the Company
were insufficient to meet its current business plan, and the Company had
negative working capital. These and other factors raise substantial doubt
about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying
financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible
future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the
amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible
inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
Significant Accounting Policies
Use of Estimates: The preparation of financial
statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles
requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect reported
amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statement and the reported amounts
of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could
differ from the estimates.
Cash and Cash Equivalents: For financial
statement presentation purposes, the Company considers those short-term,
highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less
to be cash or cash equivalents. There were no cash equivalents at June 30,
2014 or December 31, 2013.
Property and Equipment: New property and
equipment are recorded at cost. Property and equipment included in the
bankruptcy proceedings and transferred to the Trustee had been valued at
liquidation value. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets, generally 5 years.
Expenditures for renewals and betterments are capitalized. Expenditures for
minor items, repairs and maintenance are charged to operations as incurred.
Gain or loss upon sale or retirement due to obsolescence is reflected in the
operating results in the period the event takes place.
Development
Stage Enterprise: The Company has been in the development stage since
inception.
Valuation of Long-Lived Assets: We review the
recoverability of our long-lived assets including equipment, goodwill and
other intangible assets, when events or changes in circumstances occur that
indicate that the carrying value of the asset may not be recoverable. The
assessment of possible impairment is based on our ability to recover the
carrying value of the asset from the expected future pre-tax cash flows
(undiscounted and without interest charges) of the related operations. If
these cash flows are less than the carrying value of such asset, an
impairment loss is recognized for the difference between estimated fair
value and carrying value. Our primary measure of fair value is based on
discounted cash flows. The measurement of impairment requires management to
make estimates of these cash flows related to long-lived assets, as well as
other fair value determinations.
Stock Based Compensation:
Stock-based awards are accounted for using the fair value method in
accordance with ASC 718, Share-Based Payments. Our primary type of
share-based compensation consists of stock options. We use the Black-Scholes
option pricing model in valuing options. The inputs for the valuation
analysis of the options include the market value of the Company's common
stock, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock, the exercise
price of the warrants and the risk free interest rate.
Accounting For
Obligations And Instruments Potentially To Be Settled In The Company's Own
Stock: We account for obligations and instruments potentially to be settled
in the Company's stock in accordance with FASB ASC 815, Accounting for
Derivative Financial Instruments. This issue addresses the initial balance
sheet classification and measurement of contracts that are indexed to, and
potentially settled in, the Company's own stock.
Fair Value of
Financial Instruments: FASB ASC 825, "Financial Instruments," requires
entities to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets
and liabilities recognized and not recognized on the balance sheet, for
which it is practicable to estimate fair value. FASB ASC 825 defines fair
value of a financial instrument as the amount at which the instrument could
be exchanged in a current transaction between willing parties. At June 30,
2014 and December 31, 2013, the carrying value of certain financial
instruments (cash and cash equivalents, accounts payable and accrued
expenses.) approximates fair value due to the short-term nature of the
instruments or interest rates, which are comparable with current rates.
Fair Value Measurements: The Company measures fair value under a
framework that utilizes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs
to valuation techniques used to measure fair value. The hierarchy gives the
highest priority to unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical
assets or liabilities (level 1 measurements) and the lowest priority to
unobservable inputs (level 3 measurements). The three levels of inputs which
prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value are:
Level 1:
Inputs to the valuation methodology are unadjusted quoted prices for
identical assets or liabilities in active markets that the Company has the
ability to access.
Level 2: Inputs to the valuation methodology
include:
- Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active
markets;
- Quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities
in inactive markets;
- Inputs other than quoted prices that are
observable for the asset or liability;
- Inputs that are derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or
other means.
If the asset or liability has a specified (contractual)
term, the level 2 input must be observable for substantially the full term
of the asset or liability.
Level 3: Inputs to the valuation
methodology are unobservable and significant to the fair value measurement.
The assets or liability's fair value measurement level within the fair
value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. Valuation techniques used need to
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs. The following table presents assets that were measured and recognize
at fair value on June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 and the year then ended
on a recurring basis:
Fair Value Measurements at June 30, 2014 |
||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active |
Significant Other |
Significant |
||||||
Markets for Identical Assets |
Observable Inputs |
Unobservable Inputs |
||||||
Total |
(Level 1) |
(Level 2) |
(Level 3) |
|||||
None | $ |
- |
$ |
- | $ |
- |
$ |
- |
Total assets at fair value | $ |
- |
$ |
- | $ |
- |
$ |
- |
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2013 |
||||||||
Quoted Prices in Active |
Significant Other |
Significant |
||||||
Markets for Identical Assets |
Observable Inputs |
Unobservable Inputs |
||||||
Total |
(Level 1) |
(Level 2) |
(Level 3) |
|||||
None | $ |
- |
$ |
- | $ |
- |
$ |
- |
Total assets at fair value | $ |
- |
$ |
- | $ |
- |
$ |
- |
When the Company changes its valuation inputs for measuring financial assets
and liabilities at fair value, either due to changes in current market
conditions or other factors, it may need to transfer those assets or liabilities
to another level in the hierarchy based on the new inputs used. The Company
recognizes these transfers at the end of the reporting period that the transfers
occur. For the fiscal periods ended June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, there
were no significant transfers of financial assets or financial liabilities
between the hierarchy levels.
Earnings per Common Share: We
compute net income (loss) per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earning per
Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per
share (EPS) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by
dividing net income (loss) available to common shareholders (numerator) by the
weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period.
Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding
during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred
stock using the if-converted method. In computing Diluted EPS, the average stock
price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be
purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes
all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti-dilutive. All per share
disclosures retroactively reflect shares outstanding or issuable as though the
reverse split had occurred January 1, 2010.
Income Taxes: We have adopted ASC 740, Accounting for Income Taxes. Pursuant to ASC 740, we are required to compute tax asset benefits for net operating losses carried forward. The potential benefits of net operating losses have not been recognized in these financial statements because the Company cannot be assured it is more likely than not it will utilize the net operating losses carried forward in future years.
We must make certain estimates and judgments in determining income tax expense for financial statement purposes. These estimates and judgments occur in the calculation of certain tax assets and liabilities, which arise from differences in the timing of recognition of revenue and expense for tax and financial statement purposes.
Deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined based on the differences between financial reporting and the tax basis of assets and liabilities using the tax rates and laws in effect when the differences are expected to reverse. ASC 740 provides for the recognition of deferred tax assets if realization of such assets is more likely than not to occur. Realization of our net deferred tax assets is dependent upon our generating sufficient taxable income in future years in appropriate tax jurisdictions to realize benefit from the reversal of temporary differences and from net operating loss, or NOL, carryforwards. We have determined it more likely than not that these timing differences will not materialize and have provided a valuation allowance against substantially all of our net deferred tax asset.
Management will continue to evaluate the realizability of the deferred tax asset and its related valuation allowance. If our assessment of the deferred tax assets or the corresponding valuation allowance were to change, we would record the related adjustment to income during the period in which we make the determination. Our tax rate may also vary based on our results and the mix of income or loss in domestic and foreign tax jurisdictions in which we operate.
In addition, the calculation of our tax liabilities involves dealing with uncertainties in the application of complex tax regulations. We recognize liabilities for anticipated tax audit issues in the U.S. and other tax jurisdictions based on our estimate of whether, and to the extent to which, additional taxes will be due. If we ultimately determine that payment of these amounts is unnecessary, we will reverse the liability and recognize a tax benefit during the period in which we determine that the liability is no longer necessary. We will record an additional charge in our provision for taxes in the period in which we determine that the recorded tax liability is less than we expect the ultimate assessment to be.
ASC 740 which requires recognition of estimated income taxes payable or refundable on income tax returns for the current year and for the estimated future tax effect attributable to temporary differences and carry-forwards. Measurement of deferred income tax is based on enacted tax laws including tax rates, with the measurement of deferred income tax assets being reduced by available tax benefits not expected to be realized.
Uncertain Tax Positions The Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Interpretation No. 48, "Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109, Accounting for Income Taxes" ("FIN No. 48") which was effective for the Company on January 1, 2007. FIN No. 48 addresses the determination of whether tax benefits claimed or expected to be claimed on a tax return should be recorded in the financial statements. Under FIN No. 48, the Company may recognize the tax benefit from an uncertain tax position only if it is more likely than not that the tax position will be sustained on examination by the taxing authorities based on the technical merits of the position. The tax benefits recognized in the financial statements from such position should be measured based on the largest benefit that has a greater than fifty percent likelihood of being realized upon ultimate settlement. FIN No. 48 also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods and disclosure requirements.
Our federal and state income tax returns are open for fiscal years ending on or after December 31, 2010. We are not under examination by any jurisdiction for any tax year. At December 31, 2013 we had no material unrecognized tax benefits and no adjustments to liabilities or operations were required under FIN 48.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In July 2013, FASB issued ASU No. 2013-11, "Presentation of an Unrecognized Tax Benefit When a Net Operating Loss Carryforward, a Similar Tax Loss, or a Tax Credit Carryforward Exists." The provisions of ASU No. 2013-11 require an entity to present an unrecognized tax benefit, or portion thereof, in the statement of financial position as a reduction to a deferred tax asset for a net operating loss carryforward or a tax credit carryforward, with certain exceptions related to availability. ASU No. 2013-11 is effective for interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2013. The adoption of ASU No. 2013-11 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements.
In February 2013, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued
Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2013002, Comprehensive Income (Topic
220): Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other
Comprehensive Income, to improve the transparency of reporting these
reclassifications. Other comprehensive income includes gains and losses that
are initially excluded from net income for an accounting period. Those gains
and losses are later reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive
income into net income. The amendments in the ASU do not change the current
requirements for reporting net income or other comprehensive income in
financial statements. All of the information that this ASU requires already
is required to be disclosed elsewhere in the financial statements under U.S.
GAAP. The new amendments will require an organization to:
- Present
(either on the face of the statement where net income is presented or in the
notes) the effects on the line items of net income of significant amounts
reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income - but only if the
item reclassified is required under U.S. GAAP to be reclassified to net
income in its entirety in the same reporting period; and
-
Cross-reference to other disclosures currently required under U.S. GAAP for
other reclassification items (that are not required under U.S. GAAP) to be
reclassified directly to net income in their entirety in the same reporting
period. This would be the case when a portion of the amount reclassified out
of accumulated other comprehensive income is initially transferred to a
balance sheet account (e.g., inventory for pension0related amounts) instead
of directly to income or expense.
The amendments apply to all public and private companies that report items of other comprehensive income. Public companies are required to comply with these amendments for all reporting periods (interim and annual). The amendments are effective for reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2012, for public companies. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of ASU No. 2013002 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
In January 2013, the FASB issued ASU No. 2013001, Balance Sheet (Topic 210): Clarifying the Scope of Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities, which clarifies which instruments and transactions are subject to the offsetting disclosure requirements originally established by ASU 2011011. The new ASU addresses preparer concerns that the scope of the disclosure requirements under ASU 2011011 was overly broad and imposed unintended costs that were not commensurate with estimated benefits to financial statement users. In choosing to narrow the scope of the offsetting disclosures, the Board determined that it could make them more operable and cost effective for preparers while still giving financial statement users sufficient information to analyze the most significant presentation differences between financial statements prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and those prepared under IFRSs. Like ASU 2011011, the amendments in this update will be effective for fiscal periods beginning on, or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of ASU 2013001 is not expected to have a material impact on our financial position or results of operations.
Management does not anticipate that the adoption of these standards will have a material impact on the financial statements.
The Financial Statements presented herein have been prepared by us in
accordance with the accounting policies described in our December 31, 2013
Annual Report and should be read in conjunction with the Notes to Financial
Statements which appear in that report.
The preparation of these
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States requires us to make estimates and judgments
that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and
expenses, and related disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities. On an
on-going basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related
intangible assets, income taxes, insurance obligations and contingencies and
litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various
other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the
circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments
about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other resources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
In the opinion
of management, the information furnished in these interim financial
statements reflects all adjustments necessary for a fair statement of the
financial position and results of operations and cash flows as of and for
the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2014 and 2013. All such
adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The Financial Statements do
not include some information and notes necessary to conform to annual
reporting requirements.
2. Stockholders' Equity
Common Stock
Recent Issuances of Common Stock-for the Period Ended June 30, 2014:
Stock Issued upon conversion of debt-On February 28, 2014 we issued
13,084,000 shares of our common stock in settlement of $114,414 in
convertible note payable plus associated accrued interest of $16,435. The
conversion occurred within the terms of the promissory note and no gain or
loss resulted.
Stock Issued for services-During the interim period
ended June 30, 2014 we issued 9,208,600 shares of our common stock to seven
unrelated parties as payment for services. The shares were valued at the
closing price as of the date of the agreement ($0.05) and resulted in full
recognition of $481,430 in consulting services expense. In June we cancelled
3,108,600 of these shares valued at $155,430 resulting in $305,000 in
consulting expense through June 30, 2014.
Stock Issued for cash-In
connection with a private placement of 10,000,000 shares of common stock in
March and April of 2014 we sold 4,700,000 shares to six investors for the
offering price of $0.005 per share that resulted in total proceeds of
$23,500. During June, 2014 we received $845,300 through a placement of
common stock units. Those units were sold at $0.09 per unit. Each unit
consisted of one share of common stock and one warrant to purchase common
stock. We issued 9,392,218 shares through June 30th to 19 investors of this
offering. The warrants are exercisable at $0.16 and expire in June, 2015.
Historical Activity Prior to 2014:
On February 5, 2009, the Company implemented a 3 for 1 forward stock split on its issued and outstanding shares of common stock to the holders of record as of February 5, 2009. As a result of the split, each holder of record on the record date automatically received two additional shares of the Company's common stock. After the split, the number of shares of common stock issued and outstanding were 86,145,000 (861,450 post most recent 1 for 100 reverse stock split) shares.
On October 19, 2012, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of Incorporation with the State of Delaware to change the authorized capital stock to 520,000,000 shares consisting of 500,000,000 shares of common stock, par value $0.00001 and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par value $0.00001. The certificate of amendment also authorized a reverse split of common stock at the ration of 1:100. The accompanying financial statements and related notes thereto have been adjusted accordingly to reflect this forward stock split and the reverse split in 2012. All per share disclosures retroactively reflect shares outstanding or issuable as though the reverse split had occurred at inception.
On March 17, 2008, the Company issued 9,000,000 (90,000 post most recent 1 for 100 reverse stock split) shares of its common stock to two individuals who are Directors and officers for proceeds of $300.
The Company has completed a capital formation activity in accordance with a Registration Statement on Form S-1 submitted to the SEC to register and sell in a self-directed offering 6,000,000 (60,000 post most recent 1 for 100 reverse stock split) shares of newly issued common stock at an offering price of $0.04 per share ($4.00 adjusted for most recent 1 for 100 reverse stock split) for proceeds of $80,000. The Registration Statement on Form S-1 was filed with the SEC on May 6, 2008 and declared effective on May 15, 2008. The Company had incurred $20,000 of deferred offering costs related to this capital formation activity.
As of December 10, 2008 the Company raised $200,000 and issued 60,000,000 (600,000 post most recent 1 for 100 reverse stock split) shares of its common stock pursuant to a private placement offering of 84,000,000 (840,000 post most recent 1 for 100 reverse stock split) shares, at a purchase price of $0.01 per share ($1.00 adjusted for most recent 1 for 100 reverse stock split). The Company received proceeds of $200,000. The Company incurred $20,000 of deferred offering costs related to this capital formation activity.
On January 28, 2009 the Company raised $37,150 and issued 111,450 shares of its common stock pursuant to a private placement offering.
On September 16, 2009, the Company raised $15,000 and issued 3,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to a private placement offering, at a purchase price of $5.00 per share.
In October 13, 2009 Dynamic Applications Corp. entered into an amendment to the Executive Employment Agreement between the Company and Mr. Asher Zwebner, the Company's chief financial officer. Under the Amendment, Mr. Zwebner's term of employment was extended until October 31, 2010 and in lieu of the existing employment compensation set forth in the employment agreement, Mr. Zwebner received 5,000 shares of common stock in the Company. The shares were valued at the trading price on the day that the shares were issued less 40% discount for restricted trading.
On August 23, 2011, the Company raised $3,487 and issued 1,100,000 shares
of its common stock pursuant to a private placement offering, at a purchase
price of $0.00317 per share.
On September 8, 2011, the Company amended
its Certificate of Incorporation to increase the authorized share and to
change the par value to $0.00001.
On September 27, 2011, the Company
raised $26,844 and issued 8,480,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to a
private placement offering, at a purchase price of $0.00317 per share .
On December 21, 2011, the Company raised $15,850 (of which $10,801 was
receivable at December 31, 2011) and issued 5,000,000 shares of its common
stock pursuant to a private placement offering, at a purchase price of
$0.00317 per share.
On January 9, 2012, the Company raised $1,366 and
issued 380,000 shares of its common stock pursuant to a private placement
offering, at a purchase price of $0.00317 per share .
On October 19,
2012, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Certificate of
Incorporation with the State of Delaware to change the authorized capital
stock to 520,000,000 shares consisting of 500,000,000 shares of common
stock, par value $0.00001 and 20,000,000 shares of preferred stock, par
value $0.00001. The certificate of amendment also authorized a reverse split
of common stock at the ration of 1:100. All per share disclosures
retroactively reflect shares outstanding or issuable as though the reverse
split had occurred January 1, 2008.
On June 19, 2013 we issued 5,162,000
shares of our common stock in settlement of $40,000 due to a former related
party plus associated accrued interest of $11,620. The conversion occurred
within the terms of the promissory note and no gain or loss resulted.
On June 3, 2013 we issued 100,000 shares of our common stock as payment
for services. The share were valued at the closing price as of the date of
the agreement and resulted in recognition of $28,000 in consulting services
expense for the year ended December 31, 2013.
Warrants
As part of the June 2014 unit offering the Company issued a total of
9,382,218 warrants to purchase up to 9,382,218 shares of common stock at
$0.16 per share.
The relative fair value of the warrants attached to
the common stock issued was estimated at the date of grant using the
Black-Sholes-Merton pricing model. The relative fair value of the warrants
attached to the common stock component is $282,348 and the relative fair
value of the warrants is $592,592 as of the grant date. The
Black-Sholes-Merton pricing model assumptions used are as follows: expected
dividend yield of 0%; risk-free interest rate of 0.10%-.0.11%; expected
volatility of 249%, and warrant term of one year.
On May 9, 2013 all
550,000 L&L warrants were exercised for total cash proceed of $55.
In
2013 the Company recorded $107,074 in expenses related to 600,000 vested
warrants previously granted to GUMI Tel Aviv Ltd. The warrants were valued
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The inputs for the valuation
analysis of the warrants include the market value of the Company's common
stock were as follows: the estimated volatility of the Company's common
stock used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model was 318%, the exercise
price and the risk free interest rate used were $0.05 and 0.36%,
respectively. All warrants were fully vested at December 31, 2013.
In
2013 we issued one promissory note for $20,000 that was accompanied by
550,000 detachable warrants (the L&L warrants). The warrants were valued
using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The inputs for the valuation
analysis of the warrants include the market value of the Company's common
stock on the date of grant, the estimated volatility of the Company's common
stock (194%), the exercise price of $0.00001 and the risk free interest rate
of .11%.
3. Related Party Transactions not Disclosed Elsewhere.
Due Related Parties: Amounts due related parties consist of corporate reinstatement and regulatory compliance expenses paid directly by a director of the company and unpaid compensation. Such items totaled $28,436 at June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013, respectively. The advances are not formalized by a written agreement and do not carry a specific date of payment and are non-interest bearing.
4. Notes Payable.
Current Reporting Period- for the Interim Period Ended June 30, 2014:
Unsecured Notes Payable (no conversion rights)
During 2014 the Company
signed a series of three new unsecured promissory notes with unrelated
parties for an aggregate of $14,500. The notes bear interest at 1% per annum
and are due one year from the date of issuance. The maturity dates range
from January 28, 2015 to February 6, 2015 with all amounts recorded as
current liabilities.
Unsecured Notes Payable (with conversion rights)
On February 28, 2014 nineteen holders of convertible notes with an aggregate
principal balance of $114,414 and accrued interest of $16,435 converted
their notes and accrued interest into 13,084,000 shares of common stock.
Upon conversion, $20,495 of unamortized discount arising from the previously
recorded beneficial conversion feature was recognized as additional interest
expense in the interim period ended June 30, 2014.
For the six
months ended June 30, 2014 the Company has recognized $2,923 in accrued
interest expense related to all notes and has amortized $34,034 of the
beneficial conversion feature. In addition to which has also been recorded
as interest expense. The aggregate carrying value of the notes is as
follows:
Other | Convertible | |||||
June 30, 2014 |
June 30, 2014 |
December 31, 2013 |
||||
Face amount of the notes | $ | 14,500 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 115,914 |
Less unamortized discount | $ | - | $ | - | $ | (34,034) |
Carrying value | $ | 14,500 | $ | 1,500 | $ | 81,880 |
As of June 30, 2014 one convertible note for $1,500 is in default.
Historical Activity Prior to 2014:
In August, 2011 we issued a $40,000 convertible promissory note. The note, which has a maturity date of December 31, 2013, bears interest at 15% per annum until paid or converted. The note is convertible at the option of the holder at any time and from time to time, on or after June 30, 2013, into our common stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.01 per share.
The convertible debt security was issued with a non-detachable conversion
feature. We evaluate and account for such securities in accordance with ASC
470020, "Debt - Debt with Conversion and Other Options". The note was
considered to have an embedded beneficial conversion feature because the
effective conversion price was less than the quoted market price at the time
of the issuance. This resulted in a discount to the carrying amount of the
note equal to:
- the difference between the effective conversion rate
and the market price of our common stock on the date of issuance; multiplied
by
- the number of shares into which the notes are convertible.
The initial beneficial conversion feature of $40,000 was recorded separately based on the intrinsic value method.
The value of the beneficial conversion feature was recorded as a discount to the note which was amortized over the term of the note using the effective interest method. Amortization of $12,055 of the discount arising from the beneficial conversion feature of was included in interest expense during the fiscal period ended December 31, 2011 and $27,945 in 2012.
During 2012 the Company signed a series of seven promissory notes with unrelated parties for an aggregate of $29,800. The notes bear interest at 15% per annum and are due approximately one year from the date of issuance. The notes have conversion rights that allow the holder of the note to convert the principal balance into the Company's common stock at any time after June 30, 2013 at the lender's sole discretion at $0.01 per share.
During 2013 the Company signed a series of thirteen new unsecured promissory notes with unrelated parties for an aggregate of $86,114. The notes bear interest at 12%-15% per annum and are due approximately one year from the date of issuance. The maturity dates range from February 6, 2014 to December 6, 2014 with all amounts recorded as current liabilities. The notes have conversion rights that allow the holder of the note to convert the principal balance into the Company's common stock at the lender's sole discretion at $0.01 per share. One note for $20,000 was accompanied by 550,000 detachable warrants (the L&L warrants). The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The inputs for the valuation analysis of the warrants include the market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant, the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock (194%), the exercise price of $0.00001 and the risk free interest rate of .11%.
In accordance with ASC 470, the Company has analyzed the beneficial nature of the conversion terms and determined that a beneficial conversion feature (BCF) exists. The Company calculated the value of the BCF using the intrinsic method as stipulated in ASC 470. The BCF has been recorded as a discount to the notes payable and to Additional Paid-in Capital. As of December 31, 2013, the aggregate balance of convertible notes payable was $81,880 net of unamortized discounts of $34,034.
As of June 30, 2014, the Company is not in default on any of its debt covenants with respect to the three non-convertible notes receivable.
5. Future Commitment and Issuance of Warrants.
On March 5, 2013, the Company and GUMI Tel Aviv Ltd, a major, privately-held Israeli technology company ("GUMI"), entered into development/manufacturing/marketing agreement ("GUMI Agreement"). GUMI is engaged in the manufacture, import/export, marketing and install industrial equipment and designing technical solutions.
Pursuant to the GUMI Agreement, GUMI agreed to: (i) complete the development of the Prototype of the Patented Device; (ii) manufacture the commercial model(s) of the Patented device; and (iii) market the commercial model(s) of the Patented Device.
In consideration for developing the Prototype and manufacturing and marketing/distributing commercial models of the Patented Device as well as incurring all related costs and expenses in connection therewith, the Company shall compensate GUMI as follows: (i) upon the execution of the GUMI Agreement, the Company granted GUMI warrants (the "Warrants") exercisable to purchase 200,000 shares of the Company's common stock ("Warrant Shares") at an exercise price of USD$0.05 per share (the "Exercise Price"); (ii) upon completion of the Prototype, granting GUMI additional Warrants to purchase 200,000 additional Warrant Shares at the Exercise Price; and (iii) upon completion of a Commercial Device ready for manufacture and sale, granting GUMI additional Warrants to purchase 200,000 additional Warrant Shares at the Exercise Price. The Warrants shall expire 3 years from the date of each grant and shall be subject to adjustment in the event of any recapitalization of the Company's capital stock.
In addition to the consideration represented by the grant of Warrants, the Agreement further provides that following commencement of sale of the Commercial Device and until such time that GUMI has recouped all costs and expenses that it has incurred and paid in connection with the completion of development of the Prototype and the manufacture of the Commercial Device ("Date of Recoupment"), one hundred (100%) percent of the net sales revenues shall be paid and distributed to GUMI. On and after the Date of Recoupment, net sales revenues shall be paid sixty-five (65%) percent to GUMI and thirty-five (35%) percent to the Company.
The Company recorded $107,074 in fiscal year 2013 in expenses related to 600,000 vested warrants previously granted to GUMI Tel Aviv Ltd. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. The inputs for the valuation analysis of the warrants include the market value of the Company's common stock were as follows: the estimated volatility of the Company's common stock used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model was 318%, the exercise price and the risk free interest rate used were $0.05 and 0.36%, respectively. All warrants are fully vested .
6. Development Stage Activities and Going Concern.
The Company has been in the development stage since inception. The accompanying financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, which contemplate continuation of the Company as a going concern. The Company has not established any source of revenue to cover its operating costs, and as such, has incurred an operating loss since inception. Further, as of June 30, 2014, the cash resources of the Company were insufficient to meet its current business plan. These and other factors raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. The accompanying financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of asset or the amounts and classification of liabilities that may result from the possible inability of the Company to continue as a going concern.
7. Subsequent Events.
There were no subsequent events following the period ended June 30, 2014 and throughout the date of the filing of Form 10-Q.
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONS AND RESULTS OF OPERATION Back to Table of Contents
The following discussion contains forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements give our current expectations or forecasts of future events. You can identify these statements by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. They use of words such as "anticipate", "estimate", "expect", "project", "intend", "plan", "believe", and other words and terms of similar meaning in connection with any discussion of future operating or financial performance. From time to time, we also may provide forward-looking statements in other materials we release to the public.
Plan of Operation
We are a development stage company that acquired the technology and received a patent for an electromagnetic percussion system, our Device in 2008. From 2008 until 2011, we devote minimal resources and efforts to development of our Device. During the later part of 2011 and into 2012, we renewed our interest in pursuing development of our Device. Subsequent to our year-ended December 31, 2012, we entered into an agreement with GUMI Tel Aviv Ltd, a major, privately-held Israeli technology company engaged in the manufacture and sale of industrial equipment, to develop the Prototype, which has been completed. The GUMI Agreement further provides that GUMI will manufacture and distribute fully-operational commercial models of our Device. We will continue to be dependent upon the ability of GUMI to successfully market our Device, which process has started. However, we have not yet derived any revenues from GUMI's on-going marketing efforts, which commenced in late 2013.
Our auditors have issued an opinion on our financial statements which includes a statement describing concern about our ability to continue as a going concern. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills and meet our other financial obligations. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until GUMI is successful in generating sufficient sales revenues to recoup its costs and thereafter generate additional revenues that profits we will share with GUMI on a 60%/40% basis. Accordingly, we must raise capital from sources other than the actual sale of the product until such time, if ever, that GUMI is successful with our Device.
Our plan also contemplates that as we begin to generate revenues from our Device,
together with our belief in our ability to raise either debt or equity funding from both
affiliated persons and from unaffiliated third parties, neither of which can there be any
assurance, we will seek to enhance our revenue stream by entering into joint ventures or
other business arrangements with third parties engaged in technology development. While
there can be no assurance that we will be successful in such efforts, we believe that in
Israel alone there are many opportunities that have and will continue to be presented to
us as well as to our shareholders.
Results of Operations during the three months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the three months ended June 30, 2013
We have not generated any revenues since inception. We have operating expenses related to general and administrative expenses being a public company and interest expenses. During the three-month period ended June 30, 2014, we incurred a net income of $106,844 due to a gain related to the cancelation of previously issued shares.We had expenses consisting of general and administrative expenses of $106,930 and interest expenses of $86 compared to a net loss of $170,336 due to general and administrative expenses of $149,312, interest expenses of $3,872 and amortization of debt discount of $17,152 during the same period in the prior year.
Results of Operations during the six months ended June 30, 2014 as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2013
We have not generated any revenues since inception. We have operating expenses related to general and administrative expenses being a public company and interest expenses. During the six-month period ended June 30, 2014, we incurred a net loss of $402,169 due to expenses consisting of general and administrative expenses of $365,212, interest expenses of $2,923 and amortization of debt discount of $34,034 compared to a net loss of $241,197 due to general and administrative expenses of $208,502, interest expenses of $6,688 and amortization of debt discount of $26,007 during the same period in the prior year.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
On June 30, 2014, we had total assets of $846,557, all of which was in cash as compared to total assets of $2,469 as of December 31, 2013, all of which was in cash as well. We had total current liabilities of $48,787 consisting of $4,000 in accrued expenses, $351 in accrued interest, $28,436 in advances payable to related parties, $14,500 in notes payable to unrelated parties and $1,500 in convertible notes payable net of discount compared to current liabilities of $128,179 representing $4,000 in accrued expenses, $13,863 in accrued interest, $28,436 in advances payable to related parties and $81,880 in convertible notes payable net of discount as of December 31, 2013. Our accumulated deficits as of June 30, 2014 and December 31, 2013 were $1,225,374 and $823,205, respectively.
We used $39,212 in our operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2014, which was mainly due to a net loss of $402,169 offset by increases in amortization of debt discount of $34,034, non-cash compensation expenses valued at $326,000 and an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities by $2,923. We used $68,967 in our operating activities during the six months ended June 30, 2013, which was mainly due to a net loss of $241,197 offset by increases in amortization of debt discount of $26,007, non-cash compensation expenses valued at $28,000, warrants issued valued at $107,074 and an increase in accounts payable and accrued liabilities of $11,149.
We financed our negative cash flow from operations during the six months ended June 30, 2014 through proceeds from issuance of common stock of $868,800 and proceeds from the issuance of notes of $14,500 representing total cash generated by financing activities of $883,300. We financed our negative cash flow from operations during the six months ended June 30, 2013 through proceeds from the issuance of common stock of $55 and convertible notes of $77,614.
During the six months ended June 30, 2014, the Company issued three unsecured promissory notes to unrelated parties for an aggregate of $14,500.
The notes bear interest at 1% per annum and are due one year from the date of issuance. The maturity dates range from January 28, 2015 to February 6, 2015.The due dates and the note holders are as follows:
Note Holder | Note Due Date |
Amir Uziel | 1/28/2015 |
Amir Uziel | 1/28/2015 |
I.M.W.T. Holdings Ltd. | 2/6/2015 |
We do not have, at present, sufficient capital resources to fully implement our business plan. While we believe that we should be able to generate positive cash flow from operations during the year 2014, there can be no assurance that this will prove to be correct or that revenues, if any, will be sufficient to fund our ongoing operating expenses. Accordingly, we plan to raise these funds through a private offering of our equity securities or through issuance of convertible debt instruments. There can be no assurance that additional capital will be available to us. We currently have no agreements, arrangements or understandings with any person to obtain funds through bank loans, lines of credit or any other sources.
Our auditors have issued an opinion on our financial statements which includes a statement describing our going concern status. This means that there is substantial doubt that we can continue as an on-going business for the next twelve months unless we obtain additional capital to pay our bills and meet our other financial obligations. This is because we have not generated any revenues and no revenues are anticipated until we begin marketing the product. Accordingly, we must raise capital from sources other than the actual sale of the product. We must raise capital to implement our project and stay in business. Even if we raise the maximum amount of money in this offering, we do not know how long the money will last, however, we do believe it will last at least twelve months.
There are no limitations in our articles of incorporation on our ability to borrow funds or raise funds through the issuance of restricted common stock. Our limited resources and lack of operating history may make it difficult to do borrow funds or raise capital. Our inability to borrow funds or raise funds through the issuance of restricted common stock required to facilitate our business plan may have a material adverse effect on our financial condition and future prospects. To the extent that debt financing ultimately proves to be available, any borrowing will subject us to various risks traditionally associated with indebtedness, including the risks of interest rate fluctuations and insufficiency of cash flow to pay principal and interest.
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Back to Table of ContentsNone.
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Back to Table of ContentsEvaluation of disclosure controls and procedures. As of June 30, 2014, the Company's chief executive officer and chief financial officer conducted an evaluation regarding the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) or 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based upon the evaluation of these controls and procedures, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of the end of the period covered by this report.
Changes in internal controls. During the quarterly period covered by this report, no changes occurred in our internal control over financial reporting that materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Back to Table of ContentsWe are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us. However, from time to time, we may become a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business.
Back to Table of ContentsIn addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part I, Item 1. Description of Business, subheading "Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A for the year ended December 31, 2013, which could materially affect our business, financial condition or future results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K/A are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS
Back to Table of ContentsReference is being made to the Company's Form 8-K as filed with the SEC on June 20, 2014 and July 11, 2014 with disclosure under item 3.02 "Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities".
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES
Back to Table of ContentsNone.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE.
Back to Table of ContentsNot applicable.
Back to Table of ContentsNot applicable.
Back to Table of Contents(a) The following documents are filed as exhibits to this report on Form 10-Q or incorporated by reference herein. Any document incorporated by reference is identified by a parenthetical reference to the SEC filing that included such document.
Exhibit No. |
Description |
---|---|
31.1 | Section 302 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Company's CEO, Mordechi Bignitz, filed herewith. |
31.2 | Section 302 Certification of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of the Company's CFO, Shmuel De-Saban, filed herewith. |
32.1 | Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Mordechi Bignitz as CEO, filed herewith |
32.2 | Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 of Shmuel De-Saban as CFO, filed herewith |
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its
behalf by the undersigned.
DYNAMIC APPLICATIONS CORP.
By: /s/ Mordechi Bignitz
Mordechi Bignitz
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: July 29, 2014
By: /s/ Shmuel De-Saban
Shmuel De-Saban
Chief Financial Officer
(Principal Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
Date: July 29, 2014
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Act of 1934, this report has been signed by
the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates
indicated.
By: /s/ Mordechi Bignitz
Mordechi Bignitz
Chief Executive Officer
(Principal Executive Officer)
Date: July 29, 2014