Oxford Square Capital Corp. - Quarter Report: 2008 June (Form 10-Q)

June 30, 2008

December 31, 2007

Eurodollar Time Deposit (due 7/1/08 and 1/2/08)

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Form 10-Q

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED JUNE 30, 2008

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-50398

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

MARYLAND

20-0188736

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification No.)

8 SOUND SHORE DRIVE, SUITE 255 GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT 06830

(Address of principal executive office)

(203) 983-5275

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.


Large accelerated filer ¨				Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer ¨ (do not check if smaller reporting company)				Smaller reporting company ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. The number of shares of the issuer’s Common Stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of August 8, 2008 was 26,189,851.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

TABLE OF CONTENTS


PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited)	3

	Statements of Assets and Liabilities as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007	3

	Schedule of Investments as of June 30, 2008	4

	Schedule of Investments as of December 31, 2007	7

	Statements of Operations for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007	10

	Statements of Changes in Net Assets for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007	11

	Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007	12

	Notes to Financial Statements	13

Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	20

	Forward-Looking Statements	20

	Overview	20

	Critical Accounting Policies	22

	Portfolio Composition and Investment Activity	24

	Results of Operations	27

	Liquidity and Capital Resources	30

	Recent Developments	34

Item 3.	Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk	34

Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	34

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION		34

Item 1.	Legal Proceedings	34

Item 1A.	Risk Factors	35

Item 2	Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds	45

Item 3.	Defaults Upon Senior Securities	45

Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	46

Item 5.	Other Information	46

Item 6.	Exhibits	46

SIGNATURES		48

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES


	June 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
	(unaudited)
ASSETS
Investments, at fair value (cost: $361,185,620 @ 6/30/08; $411,125,347 @ 12/31/07)
Non-affiliated/non-control investments ($340,073,159 @ 6/30/08; $389,288,207 @ 12/31/07)	$	286,448,295		$	360,530,609
Control investments (cost: $21,112,461 @ 6/30/08; $21,837,140 @ 12/31/07)		25,625,000			24,837,140

Total investments at fair value		312,073,295			385,367,749

Cash and cash equivalents		15,366,663			7,944,608
Interest receivable		1,564,860			2,876,424
Prepaid expenses and other assets		297,168			201,372

Total assets	$	329,301,986		$	396,390,153

LIABILITIES
Investment advisory fee payable to affiliate	$	1,904,270		$	2,123,168
Accrued interest payable		56,724			310,312
Accrued expenses		1,882,307			87,170
Loans payable		70,000,000			136,500,000

Total liabilities		73,843,301			139,020,650

NET ASSETS
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 shares authorized, and 26,189,851 and 21,563,717 issued and outstanding, respectively		261,899			215,637
Capital in excess of par value		319,306,013			296,578,543
Net unrealized depreciation on investments		(49,112,325	)		(25,757,598	)
Accumulated net realized losses on investments		(12,490,384	)		(13,389,509	)
Distributions in excess of investment income		(2,506,518	)		(277,570	)

Total net assets		255,458,685			257,369,503

Total liabilities and net assets	$	329,301,986		$	396,390,153

Net asset value per common share	$	9.75		$	11.94

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

JUNE 30, 2008

(unaudited)


COMPANY⁽¹⁾	INDUSTRY	INVESTMENT	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT		COST		FAIR VALUE⁽²⁾
Questia Media, Inc.	digital media	senior secured notes⁽³⁾⁽⁹⁾	$	14,358,128	$	14,358,128	$	14,070,963
		(11.00%, due January 28, 2009)

TrueYou.com Inc.	medical services	preferred stock series E⁽⁷⁾				1,297,115		0

The Endurance International Group, Inc.	web hosting	convertible preferred stock⁽⁷⁾				423,750		0

Avue Technologies Corp.	software	warrants to purchase common units⁽⁷⁾				13,000		13,000

3001, Inc.	geospatial imaging	senior unsecured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁹⁾		17,200,000		17,200,000		16,684,000
		(10.35%, due October 1, 2010)

Segovia, Inc.	satellite communications	senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)(9)		22,000,000		21,916,090		21,780,000
		(9.32%, due February 8, 2010)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾				600,000		2,200,000

WHITTMANHART, Inc.	IT consulting	senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁹⁾		11,650,000		11,650,000		8,155,000
		(13.58%, due March 23, 2010)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾				0		0

Falcon Communications, Inc.	satellite communications	senior unsecured notes^(4)(7)(11)		10,500,000		10,500,000		1,000,000
		(10.96%, due March 31, 2011)

Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc. (f/k/a “Willow CSN Incorporated”)	virtual workforce services	senior secured notes^(4)(5)(9) (11.60%, due June 30, 2010) warrants to purchase		10,500,000		10,420,347		10,500,000
		convertible preferred stock ⁽⁷⁾				200,000		250,000

NetQuote, Inc.	web-based services	senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁹⁾		25,000,000		25,000,000		24,875,000
		(10.50%, due May 1, 2011)

GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc.	interactive voice messaging services	senior secured notes^{(3)(4)(5)(7)(11)} (0.0%, due October 30, 2014)		3,500,000		2,624,193		2,000,000
		convertible preferred stock⁽⁷⁾				1,500,000		0

Group 329, LLC	digital imaging	senior secured term A notes^(4)(5)(9)		10,280,773		10,247,470		8,995,676
(d/b/a “The CAPS Group”)		(11.89%, due February 28, 2011)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾				110,000		0
		senior secured term B notes^(4)(5)(9)		12,985,000		12,931,538		4,544,750
		(12.39%, due February 28, 2012)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾				90,000		0

American Integration Technologies, LLC.	semiconductor capital equipment	senior secured notes^(4)(6)(9) (10.75%, due October 31, 2010)		22,150,000		22,150,000		20,488,750

Power Tools, Inc.	software	senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)(9)		10,375,000		10,184,643		8,500,238
		(12.00%, due May 16, 2014)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾				350,000		0

Algorithmic Implementations, Inc.	software	senior secured notes^(4)(5)(6)(9) (10.90%, due September 11, 2010)		19,625,000		18,112,461		19,625,000
(d/b/a “Ai Squared”)		common stock⁽⁷⁾
						3,000,000		6,000,000

Fusionstorm, Inc.	IT value-added reseller	senior subordinated unsecured notes^(4)(5)(6)		13,125,000		12,703,794		11,910,938
		(15.48%, due October 2, 2011)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾				725,000		225,000

(Continued on next page)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

JUNE 30, 2008

(unaudited)


COMPANY⁽¹⁾	INDUSTRY	INVESTMENT	PRINCIPAL AMOUNT	COST		FAIR VALUE⁽²⁾
Punch Software LLC	software	senior secured notes^(4)(5)(9)	7,700,000		7,583,029		7,141,750
		(11.64%, due October 30, 2011)
		warrants to purchase Class A-1 units⁽⁷⁾			200,000		100,000

SCS Holdings II, Inc.	IT value-added reseller	second lien senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁹⁾	14,500,000		14,515,177		13,050,000
		(8.80%, due May 30, 2013)

AKQA, Inc.	advertising	senior secured notes^(4)(6)(9)	24,687,500		24,687,500		22,218,750
		(7.69%, due March 20, 2013)

PrePak Systems, Inc.	repackaging	senior secured notes^(4)(6)(9)	10,500,000		10,500,000		10,395,000
		(9.32%, due April 10, 2012)

Box Services, LLC	digital imaging	senior secured notes^(4)(6)(9)	12,656,752		12,656,752		11,897,347
		(7.93%, due April 30, 2012)

Pulvermedia, LLC	media productions	senior secured notes^{(4)(5)(6)(7)(11)}	10,560,000		8,572,423		0
		(11.57%, due June 27, 2012)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁷⁾			300,000		0

Hyland Software, Inc.	enterprise software	second lien senior secured notes^(4)(5)(9)	11,000,000		10,915,716		9,900,000
		(9.46%, due July 31, 2014)

WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC	real estate development	second lien senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁹⁾	15,000,000		15,000,000		13,500,000
		(11.45%, due August 1, 2008)

Empire Scaffold, LLC	scaffold rental	senior secured term A notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁹⁾	6,350,000		6,350,000		6,350,000
		(9.66%, due August 17, 2012)
		senior secured term B notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁹⁾	4,500,000		4,500,000		4,500,000
		(13.66%, due August 17, 2013)

Integra Telecomm, Inc.	telecommunications software	second lien senior secured notes^(4)(5)(9) (9.90%, due February 28, 2014)	5,000,000		4,823,929		4,550,000

Educate, Inc.	education	second lien senior secured notes⁽⁴⁾⁽⁹⁾	1,500,000		1,500,000		1,260,000
		(8.06%, due June 14, 2014)

GXS Worldwide Inc.	software	first lien senior secured notes ^(4)(5)(6)(9)	12,892,525		12,713,086		12,489,633
		(7.02%, due March 31, 2013)

Palm, Inc.	consumer electronics	first lien senior secured notes ^(4)(5)(6)(9)	19,850,000		18,060,479		12,902,500
		(5.99%, due April 24, 2014)

Total Investments				$	361,185,620	$	312,073,295

(Continued on next page)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

JUNE 30, 2008

(unaudited)

⁽¹⁾

Other than Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. (d/b/a AiSquared), which we may be deemed to control, we do not “control” and are not an “affiliate” of any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would be presumed to “control” a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an “affiliate” of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities.

⁽²⁾	Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company.

⁽³⁾	Investment includes payment-in-kind interest.

⁽⁴⁾	Notes bear interest at variable rates.

⁽⁵⁾	Cost and fair value reflect accretion of original issue discount or market discount.

⁽⁶⁾	Cost and fair value reflect repayment of principal.

⁽⁷⁾	Non-income producing at the relevant period end.

⁽⁸⁾

As a percentage of net assets at June 30, 2008, investments at fair value are categorized as follows: senior secured notes (107.1%), senior unsecured notes (6.9%), senior subordinated unsecured notes (4.7%), preferred stock (0.0%), common stock (2.3%), and warrants to purchase equity securities (1.1%).

⁽⁹⁾	Debt investment pledged as collateral under the Company’s revolving credit agreement, with the following credit limits noted: Questia Media, Inc. ($10.5 million).

⁽¹⁰⁾	Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for federal income tax purposes is $6,349,522; aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $55,354,517 Net unrealized depreciation is $49,004,995 based upon a tax cost basis of $361,078,290.

⁽¹¹⁾	Debt investment on non-accrual status at the relevant period end.

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007


Company⁽¹⁾	Industry	Investment	Principal Amount		Cost		Fair Value⁽²⁾
Questia Media, Inc.	digital media	senior secured notes^(3)(11)	$	14,358,127	$	14,358,127	$	14,358,127
		(11.00%, due January 28, 2009)

TrueYou.com Inc.	medical services	preferred stock series E⁽⁹⁾				1,297,115		0

The Endurance International Group, Inc.	web hosting	convertible preferred stock⁽⁹⁾				423,750		0

Avue Technologies Corp.	software	warrants to purchase common units⁽⁹⁾				13,000		13,000

TrenStar Inc.	logistics	senior secured notes^{(3)(5)(7)(11)}		11,850,000		11,850,000		11,850,000
	technology	(10.25%, due September 1, 2009)
		warrants to purchase convertible
		preferred stock⁽⁹⁾				0		0

3001, Inc.	geospatial	senior unsecured notes^(5)(11)		17,200,000		17,200,000		17,200,000
	imaging	(10.35%, due October 1, 2010)

Segovia, Inc.	satellite	senior secured notes^{(5)(6)(7)(11)}		23,000,000		22,890,021		22,890,021
	communications	(10.96%, due February 8, 2010)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁹⁾				600,000		1,750,000
WHITTMANHART, Inc.	IT consulting	senior secured notes^(4)(5)(11)		12,000,000		12,000,000		12,000,000
		(11.58%, due March 23, 2010)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁹⁾				0		0
Falcon Communications, Inc.	satellite communications	senior unsecured notes^(5)(13) (10.00%, due March 31, 2011)		10,500,000		10,500,000		1,000,000

Arise Virtual Solutions, Inc. (f/k/a “Willow CSN Incorporated”)	virtual workforce services	senior secured notes^(5)(6)(11)		10,500,000		10,400,280		10,400,280
		(11.60%, due June 30, 2010)
		warrants to purchase
		convertible preferred stock⁽⁹⁾				200,000		200,000
NetQuote, Inc.	web-based services	senior secured notes^(5)(11)		15,000,000		15,000,000		15,000,000
		(14.00%, due August 16, 2010)

GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc.	interactive voice	senior secured notes^{(3)(5)(6)(9)(13)}		3,500,000		2,500,000		2,500,000
GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc.	messaging services	(0.0%, due October 30, 2014)
		convertible preferred stock⁽⁹⁾				1,500,000		0

Aviel Services, Inc.	IT consulting	senior unsecured notes^(5)(6)(11)		14,500,000		14,324,926		14,324,926
		(14.23%, due September 23, 2010)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁹⁾				300,000		1,200,000

Group 329, LLC (d/b/a “The CAPS Group”)	digital imaging	senior secured term A notes^(5)(6)(11) (11.89%, due February 28, 2011)		10,750,000		10,705,086		10,705,086
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁹⁾				110,000		0
		senior secured term B notes^(5)(6)(11) (12.39%, due February 28, 2012)		12,750,000		12,688,677		10,250,000
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁹⁾				90,000		0

American Integration Technologies, LLC.	semiconductor capital equipment	senior secured notes^(5)(7)(11) (11.00%, due October 31, 2010)		23,600,000		23,600,000		23,600,000

(Continued on next page)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007


Company⁽¹⁾	Industry	Investment	Principal Amount	Cost		Fair Value⁽²⁾
Power Tools, Inc.	software	senior secured notes^{(5)(6)(7)(11)}	10,500,000		10,288,158		8,500,000
		(14.27%, due May 16, 2011)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁹⁾			350,000		0

Iridium Satellite LLC	satellite communications	senior secured first lien tranche A notes^{(5)(6)(7)(11)} (9.24%, due June 30, 2010)	4,603,240		4,587,671		4,614,748
		senior secured first lien tranche B notes^{(5)(6)(7)(11)} (9.24%, due July 27, 2011)	2,926,256		2,884,568		2,933,572
		senior secured second lien notes ^(5)(6)(11) (13.24%, due July 27, 2012)	2,000,000		1,953,832		2,020,000

Algorithmic Implementations, Inc.	software	senior secured notes^{(5)(6)(7)(11)} (10.90%, due September 11, 2010)	20,750,000		18,837,140		18,837,140
(d/b/a “Ai Squared”)		common stock⁽⁹⁾			3,000,000		6,000,000

Fusionstorm, Inc.	IT value-added reseller	senior subordinated unsecured notes^(5)(6)(7) (15.48%, due October 2, 2011)	13,750,000		13,245,264		13,245,264
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁹⁾			725,000		225,000

Punch Software LLC	software	senior secured notes^(5)(6)(11)	9,000,000		8,856,960		8,856,960
		(10.64%, due October 30, 2011)
		warrants to purchase Class A-1 units⁽⁹⁾			200,000		100,000

SCS Holdings II, Inc.	IT value-added reseller	second lien senior secured notes^(5)(11)	14,500,000		14,516,717		13,775,000
		(10.83%, due May 30, 2013)

AKQA, Inc.	advertising	senior secured notes^(5)(7)(11)	24,812,500		24,812,500		24,750,469
		(9.58%, due March 20, 2013)

PrePak Systems, Inc.	repackaging	senior secured notes^{(4)(5)(7)(11)}	9,500,000		9,500,000		9,500,000
		(10.50%, due April 10, 2012)

Box Services, LLC	digital imaging	senior secured notes^{(4)(5)(7)(11)}	13,185,000		13,185,000		13,185,000
		(10.38%, due April 30, 2012)

Pulvermedia, LLC	media productions	senior secured notes^(5)(7)(13)	10,560,000		10,304,695		0
		(11.50%, due June 27, 2012)
		warrants to purchase common stock⁽⁹⁾			300,000		0

Hyland Software, Inc.	enterprise software	second lien senior secured notes^(5)(11)	8,000,000		8,000,000		7,920,000
		(11.43%, due July 31, 2014)

WAICCS Las Vegas, LLC	real estate development	second lien senior secured notes^(5)(11)	15,000,000		15,000,000		14,625,000
		(14.25%, due August 1, 2008)

Empire Scaffold, LLC	scaffold rental	senior secured term A notes^(5)(11)	6,500,000		6,500,000		6,500,000
		(8.91%, due August 17, 2012)
		senior secured term B notes^(4)(5)(11)	3,500,000		3,500,000		3,500,000
		(12.91%, due August 17, 2013)

Intergraph Corporation	enterprise software	second lien senior secured notes^(5)(6)(11) (11.06%, due November 28, 2014)	14,300,000		14,176,474		14,049,750

Integra Telecomm, Inc.	telecommunications software	first lien senior secured notes^{(5)(6)(7)(11)} (9.20%, due August 31, 2013)	4,987,500		4,797,248		4,925,156
		second lien senior secured notes^(5)(6)(11) (11.96%, due February 28, 2014)	5,000,000		4,808,644		5,025,000

Educate, Inc.	education	second lien senior secured notes^(5)(11) (10.50%, due June 14, 2014)	1,500,000		1,500,000		1,417,500

GXS Worldwide Inc.	software	first lien senior secured notes^{(5)(6)(7)(11)} (9.20%, due March 31, 2013)	14,962,500		14,746,362		14,663,250

Palm, Inc.	consumer electronics	first lien senior secured notes^{(5)(6)(7)(11)} (8.35%, due April 24, 2014)	19,950,000		17,998,132		16,957,500

Total Investments				$	411,125,347	$	385,367,749

(Continued on next page)

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS

DECEMBER 31, 2007

⁽¹⁾

⁽²⁾	Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company.

⁽³⁾	Investment includes payment-in-kind interest.

⁽⁴⁾	Transaction also includes a commitment for additional notes and warrants upon satisfaction of certain specific conditions.

⁽⁵⁾	Notes bear interest at variable rates.

⁽⁶⁾	Cost and fair value reflect accretion of original issue discount.

⁽⁷⁾	Cost and fair value reflect repayment of principal.

⁽⁸⁾	Preferred stock and common stock indirectly held through a limited liability company in which we own membership interests.

⁽⁹⁾	Non-income producing at the relevant period end.

⁽¹⁰⁾	As a percentage of net assets at December 31, 2007, investments at fair value are categorized as follows: senior secured notes (128.3%), senior unsecured notes (12.6%), senior subordinated unsecured notes (5.1%), common stock (2.3%), and warrants to purchase equity securities (1.4%).

⁽¹¹⁾	Debt investment pledged as collateral under the Company’s revolving credit agreement, with the following credit limits noted: Questia Media, Inc. ($10.7 million).

⁽¹²⁾	Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for federal income tax purposes is $5,643,843; aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $31,294,111 Net unrealized depreciation is $25,650,268 based upon a tax cost basis of $411,018,017.

⁽¹³⁾	Debt investment on non-accrual status at the relevant period end.

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(unaudited)


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2008			Three Months Ended June 30, 2007			Six Months Ended June 30, 2008			Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
INVESTMENT INCOME
From non-affiliated/non-control investments:
Interest income - debt investments	$	8,933,424		$	8,694,043		$	19,382,948		$	17,352,443
Interest income - cash and cash equivalents		68,691			103,030			124,683			224,549
Other income		323,645			1,025,462			531,425			1,305,712

Total investment income from non-affiliated/non-control investments		9,325,760			9,822,535			20,039,056			18,882,704

From control investments:
Interest income - debt investments		748,660			848,134			1,515,187			1,684,825
Other income		0			0			0			0

Total investment income from control investments		748,660			848,134			1,515,187			1,684,825

Total investment income		10,074,420			10,670,669			21,554,243			20,567,529

EXPENSES
Compensation expense		222,000			200,000			444,000			400,000
Investment advisory fees		1,904,271			1,781,001			4,084,126			3,422,556
Professional fees		375,689			191,512			725,616			442,697
Interest expense		1,261,630			1,233,562			3,323,067			2,237,788
General and administrative		538,656			307,606			934,604			479,347

Total expenses		4,302,246			3,713,681			9,511,413			6,982,388

Net investment income		5,772,174			6,956,988			12,042,830			13,585,141

Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments		(955,331	)		(6,822,463	)		(23,354,727	)		(9,847,924	)

Net realized gains on investments		932,944			236,972			899,125			93,765

Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	5,749,787		$	371,497		$	(10,412,772	)	$	3,830,982

Net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share:
Basic and diluted⁽¹⁾	$	0.25		$	0.34		$	0.54		$	0.67
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share:
Basic and diluted⁽¹⁾	$	0.25		$	0.02		$	(0.47	)	$	0.19
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding:
Basic and diluted⁽¹⁾		22,708,251			20,228,754			22,363,146			20,187,949

⁽¹⁾

In accordance with SFAS 128-Earnings per Share, the weighted-average shares of common stock outstanding used in computing basic and diluted earnings per share were increased retroactively by a factor of 1.021% to recognize the bonus element associated with rights to acquire shares of common stock that were issued to stockholders on May 23, 2008. See Note 4 - Earnings Per Share for additional information about the rights offering and the calculation of the associated bonus element.

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2008 (unaudited)			Year Ended December 31, 2007
Decrease in net assets from operations:
Net investment income	$	12,042,830		$	27,193,619
Net realized gains (losses) on investments		899,125			(12,560,990	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments		(23,354,727	)		(26,281,461	)

Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations		(10,412,772	)		(11,648,832	)

Dividends from net investment income		(14,271,778	)		(27,855,763	)
Distributions from net realized capital gains		—			(1,148,636	)
Tax return of capital distributions⁽¹⁾		—			(639,411	)

Distributions to shareholders		(14,271,778	)		(29,643,810	)

Capital share transactions:
Issuance of common stock (net of offering costs of $1,629,542)		20,934,434			21,578,771
Reinvestment of dividends		1,839,298			5,748,027

Net increase in net assets from capital share transactions		22,773,732			27,326,798

Total decrease in net assets		(1,910,818	)		(13,965,842	)
Net assets at beginning of period		257,369,503			271,335,345

Net assets at end of period (including over-distributed net investment income of $(2,506,518) and $(277,570), respectively)	$	255,458,685		$	257,369,503

Capital share activity:
Shares sold		4,339,226			1,437,500
Shares issued from reinvestment of dividends		286,908			420,393

Net increase in capital share activity		4,626,134			1,857,893

⁽¹⁾

Management monitors available taxable earnings, including net investment income and realized capital gains, to determine if a tax return of capital may occur for the year. To the extent the Company’s taxable earnings fall below the total amount of the Company’s distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to the Company’s stockholders. The tax character of distributions will be determined at the end of the fiscal year. However, if the character of such distributions were determined as of June 30, 2008, approximately $0.12 per share of the Company’s distributions for 2008 would have been characterized as a tax return of capital to the Company’s stockholders.

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(unaudited)


	Six Months Ended June 30, 2008			Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations	$	(10,412,772	)	$	3,830,982
Adjustments to reconcile net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash provided (used) by operating activities:
Purchases of investments		(18,290,000	)		(77,250,300	)
Repayments of principal		38,393,711			64,034,817
Proceeds from the sale of investments		31,974,197			258,996
Increase in investments due to PIK		(235,000	)		(531,144	)
Net realized gains on investments		(899,125	)		(93,765	)
Net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation on investments		23,354,727			9,847,924
Decrease in interest receivable		1,311,564			270,246
Increase in prepaid expenses and other assets		(95,796	)		(174,674	)
Amortization of discounts		(1,004,056	)		(810,320	)
Decrease in investment advisory fee payable		(218,898	)		(214,617	)
Decrease in accrued interest payable		(253,588	)		(77,837	)
Increase in accrued expenses		1,795,137			116,554

Net cash provided (used) by operating activities		65,420,101			(793,138	)

CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock		22,563,976			0
Offering expenses from the issuance of common stock		(1,629,542	)		0
Amounts borrowed under revolving credit facility		10,500,000			55,500,000
Amounts paid back under revolving credit facility		(77,000,000	)		(42,000,000	)
Distributions paid (net of stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan of $1,839,298)		(12,432,480	)		(13,323,767	)

Net cash (used) provided by financing activities		(57,998,046	)		176,233

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		7,422,055			(616,905	)
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period		7,944,608			5,181,512

Cash and cash equivalents, end of period	$	15,366,663		$	4,564,607

NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Stock issued in connection with dividend reinvestment plan	$	1,839,298		$	3,277,705
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Cash paid for interest	$	3,576,655		$	2,315,625

SEE ACCOMPANYING NOTES.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2008

NOTE 1. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

Interim financial statements of TICC Capital Corp. (“TICC” or “Company”) are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting solely of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair presentation of financial statements for the interim periods have been included. The current period’s results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that may be achieved for the year. The interim financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

NOTE 2. ORGANIZATION

TICC was incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on July 21, 2003 as a closed-end management investment company. The Company has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). In addition, the Company has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company, or RIC, under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”). The Company’s investment objective is to maximize its total return, principally by investing in the debt and equity securities of technology-related companies.

TICC’s investment activities are managed by TICC Management, LLC, (“TICC Management”), a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. BDC Partners, LLC (“BDC Partners”) is the managing member of TICC Management and serves as the administrator of TICC.

NOTE 3. INVESTMENT VALUATION

The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of the Company’s financial statements is the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 157, Fair Value Measurements, which clarifies the definition of fair value and requires companies to expand their disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, which includes inputs such as quoted prices for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities where there is little or no activity in the market; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008. The adoption of this pronouncement did not have a material effect on the Company’s financial statements, including its net asset value.

Determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments the Company makes. The Company is required to specifically value each individual investment on a quarterly basis.

Bilateral investments are debt and equity investments which are generally directly negotiated with a portfolio company and which do not have bid/ask quotations provided by an agent bank. The Company determines the fair value of bilateral investments by reference to the market in which it sources and executes these bilateral investments. Market participants generally have a strategic premise for these investments, and anticipate the sale of the company, recapitalization or initial public offering as the realization/liquidity event. The fair value, or exit price, for a bilateral security would be the hypothetical price that a market participant would pay for the investment, using a set of assumptions that are aligned with the criteria that the Company would use in originating an investment in this market, including credit quality, interest rate, maturity date and overall yield, and considering the prevailing returns available in this market. In general, the Company considers enterprise value an important element in the determination of fair value, because it represents a metric that may support the recorded value, or which, conversely, would indicate if a credit-related markdown is appropriate. The Company

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2008

also considers the specific covenants and provisions of each investment which may enable it to preserve or improve the value of the investment. In addition, the trends of the portfolio company’s basic financial metrics from the time of the original investment until the measurement date are also analyzed; material deterioration of these metrics may indicate that a discount should be applied to the investment, or a premium may be warranted in the event that metrics improve substantially and the return is higher than required for such a profile under current market conditions.

Enterprise value means the entire value of the company to a potential buyer, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time. There is no one methodology to determine enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which the Company derives a single estimate of enterprise value. To determine the enterprise value of a portfolio company, the Company analyzes its historical and projected financial results, as well as the nature and value of collateral, if any. The Company also uses industry valuation benchmarks and public market comparables. The Company also considers other events, including private mergers and acquisitions, a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent debt or equity sale or restructuring, and includes these events in the enterprise valuation process. The Company generally requires portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.

The fair value of equity interests in portfolio companies is determined based on various factors, including the enterprise value remaining for equity holders after the repayment of the portfolio company’s debt and other preference capital, and other pertinent factors such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio company, recent transactions involving the purchase or sale of the portfolio company’s equity securities, or other liquidity events. The determined equity values are generally discounted when the Company has a minority position, restrictions on resale, specific concerns about the receptivity of the capital markets to a specific company at a certain time, or other factors.

The Company will record unrealized depreciation on bilateral investments when it believes that an investment has become impaired, including where collection of a loan or realization of an equity security is doubtful, or if the estimation of exit price indicates a reduction in fair value. The Company will record unrealized appreciation if it believes that the debt or equity investment has appreciated in value based upon the Company’s analysis of exit price as described above. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.

The Company’s process for determining the fair value of non-bilateral loans involves reviewing the indicative bids provided by the agent banks that make a market in each security. In addition, TICC Management prepares an analysis of each non-bilateral loan, including a financial summary, covenant compliance review, recent trading activity in the security, if known, and other business developments related to the company. This information is presented to the Company’s Valuation Committee and Board of Directors to consider when evaluating the fair value of the Company’s investments.

The Company’s Board of Directors determines the value of the Company’s investment portfolio each quarter. In connection with that determination, members of TICC Management’s portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. Since March 2004, the Company has engaged third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing its bilateral investments, although the Board of Directors ultimately determines the appropriate valuation of each such investment.

Under the valuation procedures approved by the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Valuation Committee, a third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of the Company’s bilateral investments for which market quotations are not readily available, that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company, (i) have a book value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of the Company’s total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a book value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of the Company’s total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of those third-party valuations of the Company’s portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under the Company’s credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly. However, TICC Management may seek additional valuations upon request of the Valuation Committee or the Board of Directors, or as it otherwise deems appropriate.

The Company’s assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis subject to the disclosure requirements of SFAS 157 at June 30, 2008, were as follows:


			Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using
($ in millions)	Total		Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1)		Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2)		Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3)
Investments, at fair value	$	312.1	$	0.0	$	0.0	$	312.1

A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for the three month period ending June 30, 2008, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:


($ in millions)	Bi-lateral Investments			Broadly Syndicated Investments			Total
Beginning Balance	$	240.2		$	121.1		$	361.3
Total losses (realized/unrealized) included in earnings		0.6			(0.6	)		0.0
Purchases, issuances and settlements⁽¹⁾		(18.6	)		(30.6	)		(49.2	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		0.0			0.0			0.0

Ending Balance	$	222.2		$	89.9		$	312.1

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date	$	0.6		$	(2.2	)	$	(1.6	)

⁽¹⁾	Includes amortization of discounts of approximately $0.5 million.

A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for the six month period ending June 30, 2008, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:


($ in millions)	Bilateral Investments			Other Investments			Total
Beginning balance	$	257.7		$	127.7		$	385.4
Total losses (realized/unrealized) included in earnings		(11.5	)		(10.9	)		(22.4	)
Purchases, issuances and settlements⁽¹⁾		(24.0	)		(26.9	)		(50.9	)
Transfers in and/or out of Level 3		0.0			0.0			0.0

Ending balance	$	222.2		$	89.9		$	312.1

The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to assets still held at the reporting date	$	(12.2	)	$	(10.3	)	$	(22.5	)

⁽¹⁾	Includes amortization of discounts of approximately $1.0 million.

NOTE 4. NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN NET ASSETS RESULTING FROM OPERATIONS

The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per share for the three months and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2008		Three Months Ended June 30, 2007		Six Months Ended June 30, 2008			Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
	(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)		(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Numerator for basic and diluted income per share net–investment income	$	5,772,174	$	6,956,988	$	12,042,830		$	13,585,141
Numerator for basic and diluted income per share–net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations	$	5,749,787	$	371,497	$	(10,412,772	)	$	3,830,982
Denominator for basic and diluted income per share–weighted average shares⁽¹⁾		22,708,251		20,228,754		22,363,146			20,187,949
Basic and diluted net investment income per common share⁽¹⁾	$	0.25	$	0.34	$	0.54		$	0.67
Basic and diluted net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations per common share⁽¹⁾	$	0.25	$	0.02	$	(0.47	)	$	0.19

⁽¹⁾

TICC issued transferable rights to stockholders of record on May 23, 2008. The rights entitled rights holders to subscribe for an aggregate of 4,339,226 of the Company’s common stock. Record date stockholders received one right for every outstanding share of common stock owned on the record date. The rights entitled the holders to purchase one new share of common stock for every five rights held. The subscription price equaled 88% of the volume-weighted average of the sales price of TICC’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market on the five trading days that ended on the expiration date, which was June 13, 2008. On June 18, 2008 all 4,339,226 shares of common stock were issued. Accordingly, as required by Statement of Financials Accounting Standards No. 128 - Earnings per Share, or SFAS 128, the number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share have been increased retroactively by a factor of 1.021% for all periods presented. This factor represents the impact of the bonus element of the rights offering on the Company’s common stock, based upon the closing price of the stock immediately prior to the rights trading separately from the stock on May 20th ($6.76 per share), and the expected proceeds from the rights offering (assuming an exercise price of 88% of the closing price).

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2008

NOTE 5. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement with TICC Management (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”). TICC Management is controlled by BDC Partners, its managing member. In addition to BDC Partners, TICC Management is owned by Royce & Associates, LLC (“Royce & Associates”) as the non-managing member. BDC Partners, as the managing member of TICC Management, manages the business and internal affairs of TICC Management. In addition, BDC Partners provides TICC with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to an administration agreement. Jonathan H. Cohen, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer, as well as a Director, is the managing member of BDC Partners. Saul B. Rosenthal, the Company’s President and Chief Operating Officer, is also the President and Chief Operating Officer of TICC Management and a member of BDC Partners. Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal have an equal equity interest in BDC Partners. Mr. Royce is also President and Chief Investment Officer of Royce & Associates. Royce & Associates, as the non-managing member of TICC Management, does not take part in the management or participate in the operations of TICC Management; however, Royce & Associates has agreed to make Mr. Royce or certain other portfolio managers available to TICC Management to provide certain consulting services without compensation. Royce & Associates is a wholly owned subsidiary of Legg Mason, Inc.

The Company has also entered into an Administration Agreement with BDC Partners under which BDC Partners provides administrative services for TICC. The Company pays BDC Partners an allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the administration agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of the chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, controller and other administrative support personnel, which creates conflicts of interest that the Board of Directors must monitor.

For the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, TICC incurred investment advisory fees of $1,904,271 and $1,781,001; for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, TICC incurred investment advisory fees of $4,084,126 and $3,422,556, of which $1,904,270 and $1,780,900 remained payable to TICC Management at the end of each respective quarter. Pursuant to the terms of its administration agreement with BDC Partners, for the quarters ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, TICC incurred $222,000 and $200,000 in compensation expenses for employees allocated to the administrative activities of TICC; for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, TICC incurred $444,000 and $400,000 in such expenses, of which $204,381 and $146,249 remained payable at the end of the respective quarter. TICC also incurred $19,124 and $17,732 for reimbursement of facility costs for the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively; for the six months ended June 30, 2007 and 2007, respectively, TICC incurred $38,250 and $35,732 in such expenses, of which amounts $0 remained payable at the end of each period.

NOTE 6. DIVIDENDS

The Company intends to continue to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under the Code and, as such, the Company would not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required, among other requirements, to distribute at least 90% of its annual investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code. The amount to be paid out as a dividend is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is based upon the annual earnings estimated by the management of the Company. To the extent that the Company’s earnings fall below the amount of dividends declared, however, a portion of the total amount of the Company’s dividends for the fiscal year may be deemed a return of capital for tax purposes to the Company’s stockholders.

On June 30, 2008, the Company paid a dividend of $0.30 per share. For tax purposes, the Company expects that dividends for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 will be funded primarily from net investment income. However, for the six months ended June 30, 2008, the Company had net investment income of approximately $0.54 per share, compared to aggregate distributions to stockholders of approximately $0.66 per share during the period. Management monitors available taxable earnings, including net investment income and realized capital gains, to determine if a tax return of capital may occur for the year. To the extent the Company’s taxable earnings fall below the total amount of the Company’s distributions for that

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2008

fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to the Company’s stockholders. The tax character of distributions will be determined at the end of the fiscal year. However, if the character of such distributions were determined as of June 30, 2008, approximately $0.12 per share of the Company’s distributions would have been characterized as a tax return of capital to the Company’s stockholders.

The Company has a dividend reinvestment plan under which all distributions are paid to stockholders in the form of additional shares, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash.

NOTE 7. NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE

The Company’s net asset value per share at June 30, 2008 was $9.75, and at December 31, 2007 was $11.94. In determining the Company’s net asset value per share, the Board of Directors determined in good faith the fair value of the Company’s portfolio investments for which reliable market quotations are not readily available.

NOTE 8. PAYMENT-IN-KIND INTEREST

The Company may have investments in its portfolio which contain a payment-in-kind, or PIK, provision. The PIK interest is added to the cost basis of the investment and recorded as income. To maintain the Company’s status as a RIC (as discussed in Note 6 above), this non-cash source of income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though the Company has not yet collected the cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments. For the three months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company received PIK fee income of $235,000 and PIK interest income of $21,863, respectively, and recorded a corresponding increase in the cost of the investment. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, the Company recorded PIK income of $235,000 and $531,144, respectively.

In addition, the Company recorded original issue discount income (“OID”) of approximately $475,281 and $1,004,055 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, representing the amortization of the discounted cost attributed to certain debt securities purchased by the Company in connection with the concurrent purchase of warrants or stock. The Company had approximately $384,798 and $810,320 in OID income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2007.

NOTE 9. OTHER INCOME

Other income includes primarily closing fees, or origination fees, associated with investments in portfolio companies. Such fees are normally paid at closing of the Company’s investments, are fully earned and non-refundable, and are generally non-recurring.

The 1940 Act requires that a business development company make available managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. The Company may receive fee income for managerial assistance it renders to portfolio companies in connection with its investments. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, the Company received no fee income for managerial assistance.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2008

NOTE 10. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS

Financial highlights for the three months and six months ending June 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively, are as follows:


	Three Months Ended June 30, 2008			Three Months Ended June 30, 2007			Six Months Ended June 30, 2008			Six Months Ended June 30, 2007
	(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)			(Unaudited)
Per Share Data
Net asset value at beginning of period	$	10.81		$	13.60		$	11.94		$	13.77

Net investment income⁽¹⁾		0.25			0.34			0.54			0.67
Net realized and unrealized capital gains (losses)⁽²⁾		0.01			(0.32	)		(1.01	)		(0.48	)
Effect of shares issued, net of offering expenses		(1.02	)		0.01			(1.06	)		0.03

Total from investment operations		(0.76	)		0.03			(1.53	)		0.22

Total distributions⁽³⁾		(0.30	)		(0.36	)		(0.66	)		(0.72	)

Net asset value at end of period	$	9.75		$	13.27		$	9.75		$	13.27

Per share market value at beginning of period	$	7.52		$	16.91		$	9.23		$	16.14
Per share market value at end of period	$	5.46		$	15.79		$	5.46		$	15.79
Total return⁽⁴⁾		(23.40	)%		(4.49	)%		(34.61	)%		2.19	%
Shares outstanding at end of period		26,189,851			19,907,086			26,189,851			19,907,086

Ratios/Supplemental Data
Net assets at end of period (000’s)	$	255,459		$	264,207		$	255,459		$	264,207
Average net assets (000’s)	$	239,778		$	272,266		$	249,956		$	272,908
Ratio of expenses to average net assets⁽⁵⁾		7.18	%		5.46	%		7.61	%		5.12	%
Ratio of expenses, excluding interest expense, to average net assets⁽⁵⁾		5.07	%		3.64	%		4.95	%		3.48	%
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets⁽⁵⁾		9.63	%		10.22	%		9.64	%		9.96	%

⁽¹⁾	Represents per share net investment income for the period, based upon average shares outstanding.

⁽²⁾	Net realized and unrealized capital gain (losses) includes rounding adjustment to reconcile change in net asset value per share. See “Item 2. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” for a description of realized and unrealized capital gains (losses).

⁽³⁾

⁽⁴⁾	Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming dividend reinvestment prices obtained under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan. Total return is not annualized.

⁽⁵⁾	Annualized.

NOTE 11. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, cash and cash equivalents consisted of:

NOTE 12. COMMITMENTS

As of June 30, 2008, the Company had not issued any commitment to purchase additional debt investments and/or warrants from any portfolio companies.

NOTE 13. REVOLVING CREDIT AGREEMENT

The Company has a revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”), with Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) as an agent and a lender, and Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T”) as an additional lender. As of June 30, 2008, the amount of the Credit Facility was $150 million, with RBC and BB&T each providing $75 million under the facility. The Credit Facility supplements the Company’s equity capital and provides funding for additional portfolio investments, as well as general corporate matters. All amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable within one year of the date of the borrowing; the Credit Facility has a termination date of January 29, 2009.

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

JUNE 30, 2008

Effective January 31, 2008, the Company amended its Credit Facility, extending the termination date from April 11, 2008 to January 29, 2009. RBC remains agent under the Credit Facility and RBC and BB&T remain lenders thereunder. In connection with the amendment, the Credit Facility was reduced from $180 million to $150 million as a result of the removal of Commerzbank AG as a lender. Under the terms of the amended Credit Facility, drawdowns will continue to bear interest on the same terms as before the amendment, which is generally 1.75% over LIBOR. As of June 30, 2008, the average interest rate on our borrowings was 4.23%.

Under the Credit Facility agreement the Company must satisfy, on a monthly basis, several portfolio covenant requirements including minimum market value, weighted average maturity, and weighted average coupon rate on all secured transaction assets, as well as limitations on the principal amounts of eligible transaction assets. In addition, the Company must comply with other general covenants including indebtedness, liens and pledges, restricted payments, mergers and consolidations and transactions with affiliates.

The Company had outstanding borrowings of $70.0 million under the Credit Facility as of June 30, 2008 and related accrued interest payable of approximately $57,000; the Company had borrowings of approximately $136.5 million as of December 31, 2007 and related interest payable of approximately $310,000.

Pursuant to the Company’s request and in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, the amount under the Credit Facility was reduced from $150 million to $55 million, effective August 6, 2008. The Company repaid $15 million under the Credit Facility subsequent to June 30, 2008.

NOTE 14. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

On July 31, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a distribution of $0.20 per share for the third quarter, payable on September 30, 2008 to shareholders of record as of September 10, 2008.

ITEM 2.

MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

The information contained in this section should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and related notes and schedules thereto appearing elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, as well as the sections entitled “Selected Financial Data” and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the financial statements and related notes and schedules thereto included in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2007.

This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, including the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “believes,” “seeks,” and “estimates” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements including without limitation:

•

an economic downturn could impair our customers’ ability to repay our loans and increase our non-performing assets,

•

an economic downturn could disproportionately impact the technology-related industry in which we concentrate causing us to suffer losses in our portfolio and experience diminished demand for capital in this industry sector,

•

a contraction of available credit and/or an inability to access the equity markets could impair our lending and investment activities,

•

interest rate volatility could adversely affect our results, and

•

the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our filings with the SEC.

Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and levels of profitability and the availability of additional capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this annual report should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

Except as otherwise specified, references to “TICC,” “the Company,” “we,” “us” and “our” refer to TICC Capital Corp.

The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

OVERVIEW

Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return, principally by investing in the debt and/or equity securities of technology-related companies. Our primary focus is seeking current income by investing in non-public debt securities. We also seek to provide our stockholders with long-term capital growth through the appreciation in the value of warrants or other equity instruments that we may receive when we make debt investments, or equity investments in technology-related companies. We may also invest in the publicly traded debt and/or equity securities. We operate as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company, and have elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the “1940 Act”). We have elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with our 2003 taxable year.

Our investment activities are managed by TICC Management, LLC (“TICC Management”), a registered investment adviser under the Advisers Act. TICC Management is owned by BDC Partners, LLC (“BDC Partners”), its managing member, and Royce & Associates, LLC (“Royce & Associates”). Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are the members of BDC Partners, and Charles M. Royce, our non-executive chairman, is the President of Royce & Associates. Under the Investment Advisory Agreement, we have agreed to pay TICC Management an annual base fee calculated on gross assets, and an incentive fee based upon our performance. Under an Administration Agreement, we have agreed to pay or reimburse BDC Partners, as administrator, for certain expenses incurred in operating the Company. Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of TICC Management and BDC Partners, serve or may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in a line of business similar to our own. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. For more information, see “Risk Factors—Risks Relating to our Business and Structure—There are significant potential conflicts of interest, which could impact our investment returns.”

We currently concentrate our investments in companies having annual revenues of less than $200 million and/or an equity capitalization of less than $300 million. We focus on companies that create products or provide services requiring technology and on companies that compete in industries characterized by such products or services, including companies in the following businesses: Internet, IT services, media, telecommunications, semiconductors, hardware, software and technology-enabled services.

On December 3, 2007, we changed our name from Technology Investment Capital Corp. to TICC Capital Corp. As of that date, we no longer maintain a policy to invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the value of our net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in technology related companies. We continue to maintain our primary focus, however, on the technology industry, although we have the flexibility to invest outside this sector.

While the structure of our investments will vary, we invest primarily in the debt of technology-related companies. We seek to invest in entities that, as a general matter, have been operating for at least one year prior to the date of our investment and that will, at the time of our investment, have employees and revenues. Many of these companies will have financial backing provided by private equity or venture capital funds or other financial or strategic sponsors at the time we make an investment.

We expect that our investments will generally range between $5 million and $30 million each, although this investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our capital base changes, and will accrue interest at fixed and variable rates. As of June 30, 2008, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 5.99% and 15.48% (excluding GenuTec) and maturity dates of between 3 and 76 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 10.3%.

Our loans may carry a provision for deferral of some or all of the interest payments and amendment fees, which will be added to the principal amount of the loan. This form of deferred income is referred to as “payment-in-kind” or “PIK” interest of other income and, when earned, is recorded as interest or other income and an increase in the principal amount of the loan. There was $235,000 of other income attributable to PIK associated with an amendment fee for our investment in Group 329, LLC (d/b/a “the CAPS Group”) during the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

We also borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to TICC Management, will be borne by our common stockholders.

In addition, as a business development company under the 1940 Act, we are required to make available significant managerial assistance, for which we may receive fees, to our portfolio companies. These fees would be generally non-recurring, however in some instances they may have a recurring component. We have received no fee income for managerial assistance to date.

Prior to making an investment, we typically enter into a non-binding term sheet with the potential portfolio company. These term sheets are generally subject to a number of conditions, including but not limited to the satisfactory completion of our due diligence investigations of the company’s business and legal documentation for the loan.

To the extent possible, our loans will be collateralized by a security interest in the borrower’s assets or guaranteed by a principal to the transaction. Interest payments, if not deferred, are normally payable quarterly with most debt investments having scheduled principal payments on a monthly or quarterly basis. When we receive a warrant to purchase stock in a portfolio company, the warrant will typically have a nominal strike price, and will entitle us to purchase a modest percentage of the borrower’s stock.

On May 23, 2008 we issued to our stockholders of record as of May 23, 2008 transferable rights to subscribe for up to 4,339,226 shares of our common stock. Record date stockholders received one right for each outstanding share of common stock owned on the record date. The rights, which entitled holders to purchase one new share of common stock for every five rights held, were listed for trading on the Nasdaq Global Select Market under the symbol “TICCR.” The rights offering, which was oversubscribed, resulted in the issuance of approximately 4.3 million shares of TICC common stock on June 18, 2008. The net proceeds after payment of dealer-manager fees and after other offering-related expenses were approximately $20.9 million. Subsequently, we used the net proceeds received in this offering to repay indebtedness owed under our current revolving credit facility.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we received a total of $18.9 million of proceeds from principal repayments on debt investments and we received net proceeds of approximately $32.0 million from the sale of portfolio investments.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we recorded net unrealized depreciation on investments of approximately $955,000, largely due to the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation on our debt and equity investment in Aviel Services, Inc., upon the repayment and sale, respectively, of those investments; this was partially offset by the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation on our investment participation in several syndicated loans upon the sale of those investments. The sale of portfolio investments during the quarter resulted in a realized gain of approximately $933,000. For further discussion, please refer to “—Results of Operations—Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments.”

CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES

The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and income and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified our investment valuation policy as our only critical accounting policy.

Investment Valuation

The most significant estimate inherent in the preparation of our financial statements is the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded.

In September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) 157, Fair Value Measurements, which clarifies the definition of fair value and requires companies to expand their disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. SFAS 157 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. SFAS 157 also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, which includes inputs such as quoted prices for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities where there is little or no activity in the market; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. SFAS 157 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We have adopted the provisions of SFAS 157 as of January 1, 2008.

Determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments we make. We are required to specifically value each individual investment on a quarterly basis.

Bilateral investments are debt and equity investments which are generally directly negotiated with a portfolio company and which do not have bid/ask quotations provided by an agent bank. We determine the fair value of bilateral investments by reference to the market in which we source and execute these bilateral investments. Market participants generally have a strategic premise for these investments, and anticipate the sale of the company, recapitalization or initial public offering as the realization/liquidity event. The fair value, or exit price, for a bilateral security would be the hypothetical price that a market participant would pay for the investment, using a set of assumptions that are aligned with the criteria that we would use in originating an investment in this market, including credit quality, interest rate, maturity date and overall yield, and considering the prevailing returns available in this market. In general, we consider enterprise value an important element in

the determination of fair value, because it represents a metric that may support the recorded value, or which, conversely, would indicate if a credit-related markdown is appropriate. We also consider the specific covenants and provisions of each investment which may enable us to preserve or improve the value of the investment. In addition, the trends of the portfolio company’s basic financial metrics from the time of the original investment until the measurement date are also analyzed; material deterioration of these metrics may indicate that a discount should be applied to the investment, or a premium may be warranted in the event that metrics improve substantially and the return is higher than required for such a profile under current market conditions.

Enterprise value means the entire value of the company to a potential buyer, including the sum of the values of debt and equity securities used to capitalize the enterprise at a point in time. There is no one methodology to determine enterprise value and, in fact, for any one portfolio company, enterprise value is best expressed as a range of fair values, from which we derive a single estimate of enterprise value. To determine the enterprise value of a portfolio company, we analyze its historical and projected financial results, as well as the nature and value of collateral, if any. We also use industry valuation benchmarks and public market comparables. We also consider other events, including private mergers and acquisitions, a purchase transaction, public offering or subsequent debt or equity sale or restructuring, and include these events in the enterprise valuation process. We generally require portfolio companies to provide annual audited and quarterly unaudited financial statements, as well as annual projections for the upcoming fiscal year.

The fair value of equity interests in portfolio companies is determined based on various factors, including the enterprise value remaining for equity holders after the repayment of the portfolio company’s debt and other preference capital, and other pertinent factors such as recent offers to purchase a portfolio company, recent transactions involving the purchase or sale of the portfolio company’s equity securities, or other liquidity events. The determined equity values are generally discounted when we have a minority position, restrictions on resale, specific concerns about the receptivity of the capital markets to a specific company at a certain time, or other factors.

We will record unrealized depreciation on bilateral investments when we believe that an investment has become impaired, including where collection of a loan or realization of an equity security is doubtful, or if the estimation of exit price indicates a reduction in fair value. We will record unrealized appreciation if we believe that the debt or equity investment has appreciated in value based upon our analysis of exit price as described above. Changes in fair value are recorded in the statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.

Our process for determining the fair value of non-bilateral loans involves reviewing the indicative bids provided by the agent banks that make a market in each security. In addition, TICC Management prepares an analysis of each non-bilateral loan, including a financial summary, covenant compliance review, recent trading activity in the security, if known, and other business developments related to the company. This information is presented to our Valuation Committee and Board of Directors to consider when evaluating the fair value of our investments.

Our Board of Directors determines the value of our investment portfolio each quarter. In connection with that determination, members of TICC Management’s portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. Since March 2004, we have engaged third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing its bilateral investments, although the Board of Directors ultimately determines the appropriate valuation of each such investment.

Under the valuation procedures approved by the Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Valuation Committee, a third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of our bilateral investments for which market quotations are not readily available that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company, (i) have a book value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a book value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of those third-party valuations of our portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly. However, TICC Management may seek additional valuations upon request of the Valuation Committee or the Board of Directors, or as it otherwise deems appropriate.

PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

The total fair value of our investment portfolio was approximately $312.1 million and $385.4 million at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. The decrease in investments during the six month period was due primarily to the sale of portfolio investments and debt repayments totaling approximately $70.4 million and unrealized depreciation of approximately $23.3 million. This decrease was partially offset by additional investments in five existing portfolio companies of approximately $18.3 million.

In certain instances, we receive payments based on scheduled amortization of the outstanding balances and sales of portfolio investments. In addition, we receive repayments of some of our debt investments prior to their scheduled maturity date. The frequency or volume of these repayments may fluctuate significantly from period to period. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, we had repayments of $18.9 million and $87.3 million, respectively. The repayments on our debt investments during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 largely consisted of repayments by Aviel Services, Inc. of $14.5 million. Also during the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we received approximately $32.0 million from the sale of portfolio securities, largely resulting from the sale of our investments in Intergraph Corporation ($14.2 million), Integra Telecomm, Inc. ($7.7 million) and Iridium Satellite LLC ($7.4 million).

At June 30, 2008, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, 26 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately $303.3 million, and equity investments with a fair value of approximately $8.8 million. At December 31, 2007, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, 30 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately $375.9 million, and equity investments with a fair value of approximately $9.5 million.

A reconciliation of the investment portfolio for the six months ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007:


	June 30, 2008			December 31, 2007
	(dollars in millions)			(dollars in millions)
Beginning Investment Portfolio	$	385.4		$	326.2
Portfolio Investments Acquired		18.3			187.9
Debt repayments		(38.4	)		(87.3	)
Sales of securities		(32.0	)		(4.7	)
Payment in Kind		0.2			0.5
Original Issue Discount		1.0			1.6
Net Unrealized (Depreciation) Appreciation		(23.3	)		26.3
Net Realized Gains (Losses)		0.9			(12.5	)

Ending Investment Portfolio	$	312.1		$	385.4

The following table indicates the quarterly portfolio investment activity for each quarter in the six month period ended June 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007:


	New Investments		Debt Repayments		Sales of Securities
	(dollars in millions)		(dollars in millions)		(dollars in millions)
Quarter ended
June 30, 2008	$	1.0	$	18.9	$	32.0
March 31, 2008		17.3		19.5		0.0

	$	18.3	$	38.4	$	32.0

December 31, 2007		43.9		17.2		4.1
September 30, 2007		66.8		6.4		0.0
June 30, 2007		50.8		31.2		0.2
March 31, 2007		26.4		32.5		0.4

Total	$	187.9	$	87.3	$	4.7

The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by asset class as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:


	June 30, 2008				December 31, 2007
	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio		Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
	(dollars in millions)				(dollars in millions)
Senior Secured Notes	$	273.7	87.7	%	$	330.1	85.7	%
Senior Unsecured Notes		17.7	5.7	%		32.5	8.4	%
Senior Subordinated Unsecured Notes		11.9	3.8	%		13.3	3.4	%
Common Stock		6.0	1.9	%		6.0	1.6	%
Warrants		2.8	0.9	%		3.5	0.9	%

Total	$	312.1	100.0	%	$	385.4	100.0	%

The following table shows our portfolio of investments by industry at fair value, as of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:


	June 30, 2008				December 31, 2007
	Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Fair Value		Investments at Fair Value		Percentage of Fair Value
	(dollars in millions )				(dollars in millions )
Software	$	53.9	17.3	%	$	57.0	14.8	%
Digital imaging		25.4	8.2	%		34.1	8.8	%
IT value-added reseller		25.2	8.1	%		27.2	7.1	%
Satellite communications		25.0	8.0	%		35.2	9.1	%
Web-based services		24.8	8.0	%		15.0	3.9	%
Advertising		22.2	7.1	%		24.7	6.4	%
Semiconductor capital equipment		20.5	6.6	%		23.6	6.1	%
Geospatial imaging		16.7	5.3	%		17.2	4.5	%
Digital media		14.1	4.5	%		14.4	3.7	%
Real estate		13.5	4.3	%		14.6	3.8	%
Consumer electronics		12.9	4.1	%		17.0	4.4	%
Scaffold rental		10.9	3.5	%		10.0	2.6	%
Virtual workforce services		10.7	3.4	%		10.6	2.8	%
Repackaging		10.4	3.3	%		9.5	2.5	%
Enterprise software		9.9	3.2	%		22.0	5.7	%
IT consulting		8.2	2.6	%		27.5	7.1	%
Telecommunications services		4.5	1.5	%		10.0	2.6	%
Interactive voice messaging service		2.0	0.6	%		2.5	0.6	%
Education		1.3	0.4	%		1.4	0.4	%
Logistics technology		0.0	0.0	%		11.9	3.1	%

	$	312.1	100.0	%	$	385.4	100.0	%

Since our inception in 2003, our portfolio has consisted primarily of senior loans to companies operating in the technology-related sector. We may also invest in the publicly traded debt and equity securities of other technology-related companies or take controlling interests in such companies in certain limited circumstances. We intend to continue to maintain a diverse portfolio; however, we have no policy with respect to the level of our diversification and we do not intend to operate as a “diversified company” within the meaning of the 1940 Act. On December 3, 2007, we changed our name from Technology Investment Capital Corp. to TICC Capital Corp. As of that date, we no longer maintain a policy to invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the value of our net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in technology related companies. We continue to maintain our primary focus, however, on the technology industry, although we have the flexibility to invest outside this sector.

We believe that we may begin to see opportunities to generate higher returns than we have historically, given the changes in the credit environment over the past year. At the same time, we recognize that it may be difficult to raise capital in the near future in light of our stock price and the current state of the debt and equity markets. We are also sensitive to the negative implications of maintaining a larger, fully-drawn credit facility given the uncertainty currently existing in the credit markets. Since the end of the first quarter, and in the absence of having received a written offer for extension of our credit facility from our existing lenders, we have taken steps to reduce our borrowings under our credit facility, and effective August 6, 2008 we have reduced the amount of the facility from $150 million to $55 million. On a risk-adjusted basis, we believe that, until leverage can be obtained at appropriate pricing and terms with a longer maturity that more closely matches the maturity of our investments, we are better served by de-levering the portfolio. As a result of de-levering our portfolio, our net investment income is now and will continue to be less than it might otherwise be on a more fully levered portfolio. We also note that largely as a result of this de-levering, our Board has determined to adjust the quarterly dividend to a more appropriate level, consistent with that idea.

PORTFOLIO GRADING

We have adopted a credit grading system to monitor the quality of our debt investment portfolio. As of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, our portfolio had a weighted average grade of 2.2 and 2.2, respectively, based upon the fair value of the debt investments in the portfolio. Equity securities are not graded.

At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, our debt investment portfolio was graded as follows:


		June 30, 2008
Grade	Summary Description	Principal Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio		Portfolio at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
		(dollars in millions)				(dollars in millions)
1	Trending ahead of expectations	$	57.8	16.1	%	$	57.5	19.0	%
2	Full repayment of principal and interest is expected		154.9	43.0	%		147.1	48.5	%
3	Requires closer monitoring, but full repayment of principal and interest is expected		122.6	34.1	%		95.7	31.5	%
4	Some reduction of interest income is expected, but no loss of principal is expected		—	0.0	%		—	0.0	%
5	Some loss of principal is expected		24.6	6.8	%		3.0	1.0	%

		$	359.9	100.0	%	$	303.3	100.0	%


		December 31, 2007
Grade	Summary Description	Principal Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio		Portfolio at Fair Value		Percentage of Total Portfolio
		(dollars in millions)				(dollars in millions)
1	Trending ahead of expectations	$	47.5	12.6	%	$	34.7	11.0	%
2	Full repayment of principal and interest is expected		227.0	60.4	%		213.6	67.6	%
3	Requires closer monitoring, but full repayment of principal and interest is expected		97.9	26.1	%		67.5	21.4	%
4	Some reduction of interest income is expected, but no loss of principal is expected		—	0.0	%		—	0.0	%
5	Some loss of principal is expected		3.5	0.9	%		—	0.0	%

		$	375.9	100.0	%	$	315.8	100.0	%

We expect that a portion of our investments will be in the Grades 3, 4 or 5 categories from time to time, and, as such, we will be required to work with troubled portfolio companies to improve their business and protect our investment. The number and amount of investments included in Grades 3, 4 or 5 may fluctuate from period to period.

In 2007, we experienced significant losses on three of our portfolio investments. We recorded a realized loss of $13.4 million on our original investment in senior secured notes of GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc., (“GenuTec”), as well as an unrealized loss of $1.5 million on convertible preferred stock. We recorded an unrealized loss of $9.5 million on senior unsecured notes in Falcon Communications, Inc. (“Falcon”). We also recorded a total unrealized loss of $10.6 million on senior secured notes and warrants to purchase common stock issued by Pulvermedia, Inc. (“Pulvermedia”).

During the first quarter of 2008, Pulvermedia indicated that it was projecting a sudden and dramatic decline in projected revenues and earnings for the year. Based upon the review of the company’s financial projections and operating cashflow forecasts, we determined that the debt investment warranted a complete write-down of $10.3 million, and the warrants were written-off as well, in the amount of $300,000 as of December 31, 2007. The investment was assigned a credit rating of Grade 5, and was placed on non-accrual status as of December 31, 2007. In the six month period ending June 30, 2008, we recovered $1.7 million from Pulvermedia; the cost basis of the investment was reduced by this amount, resulting in a reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation in the same amount.

As of March 31, 2008, we determined that our investment in WHITTMANHART, Inc. (“WHITTMANHART”) senior secured notes required closer monitoring and downgraded this investment from a 2 to a 3 rating. Our total investment in WHITTMANHART at that time consisted of principal amount of $12.0 million in senior secured notes which bear interest at 11.58%, and warrants which are carried at no value. We adjusted the fair value of the debt investment to $8.4 million based upon a combination of a deteriorating credit profile and widening credit spreads in the market. During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, WHITTMANHART repaid $350,000 in principal. Based upon improved operating statistics and stable credit spreads we have maintained our relative pricing on this investment.

As of March 31, 2008 we determined that our investment in Group 329, LLC (d/b/a The CAPS Group) (“CAPS”), due to further credit deterioration and widening interest rate spreads, warranted a markdown of approximately $5.8 million on the term B notes and approximately $1.2 million on the term A notes; the term B notes had previously been marked down by $2.5 million as of December 31, 2007. We continue to consider the investment credit rating to be 3. Our total investment in CAPS currently consists of a principal amount of $23.3 million ($10.3 million term A notes, and $13.0 million term B notes). The term A notes are currently amortizing, and the term B notes commence amortization payments in February 2011. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we have maintained our relative pricing on this investment.

We consider the indicative quotes provided by the agent banks in determining the fair value of our non-bilateral investments, as well as other analytical procedures and the good faith judgment of the Board. Based upon these fair value determinations as of June 30, 2008, we recorded net unrealized depreciation of $2.2 million for the quarter, in the aggregate, on the non-bilateral portfolio. We also recorded net unrealized appreciation of approximately the same amount as a result of the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation associated with the sale of our participation in several broadly syndicated loans. See “Note 3. Investment Valuation” included in the notes to our unaudited financial statements for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 set forth in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Set forth below is a comparison of our results of operations for the three months ended June 30, 2008 to the three months ended June 30, 2007.

Investment Income

Investment income for the three months ended June 30, 2008 was approximately $10.1 million compared to approximately $10.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2007. This decrease resulted primarily from lower income related to fees on our portfolio investing activities during the second quarter of 2008 due to fewer originations. Interest income on our debt investments for the three month period ended June 30, 2008 was approximately $9.7 million compared to approximately $9.5 million for the same period in 2007 as the principal value on our debt investment portfolio increased from $333.8 million to $359.9 million. For the quarter ended June 30, 2008 investment income consisted of approximately $9.2 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $475,000 in amortization of original issue discount and approximately $69,000 in cash interest from cash and cash equivalents.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2007, investment income consisted of approximately $9.1 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $21,000 in PIK interest from one investment, approximately $385,000 in amortization of original issue discount, and approximately $103,000 in cash interest from cash and cash equivalents.

As of June 30, 2008, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 5.99% and 15.48% (excluding GenuTec) and maturity dates of between 3 and 76 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 10.3% compared to 11.8% as of June 30, 2007. In addition to cash interest, our loans may carry a provision for deferral of some or all of the interest payments, which is added to the principal amount of the loan.

For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, other income of approximately $324,000 was recorded, consisting primarily of non-recurring amendment fees earned in connection with existing portfolio investments, including PIK income associated with an amendment fee on our investment in Group 329, LLC, term B notes, compared to other income of approximately $1.0 million for the same period in 2007.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 were approximately $4.3 million. This amount consisted of investment advisory fees, interest expense, professional fees, compensation expense, and general and administrative expenses. Expenses increased approximately $0.6 million from the quarter ended June 30, 2007, attributable primarily to an increase of approximately $230,000 in general and administrative expenses and an increase of approximately $184,000 in professional fees. Operating expenses for the quarter ended June 30, 2007 were approximately $3.7 million.

The investment advisory fee for the second quarter of 2008 was approximately $1.9 million, representing the base fee for the period as provided for in the investment advisory agreement as well as incentive fees earned of approximately $205,000. The investment advisory fee in the comparable period in 2007 was approximately $1.8 million which includes incentive fees of approximately $107,000. The increase of approximately $100,000 is due to an increase in average gross assets and the increase in pre-incentive fee net investment income compared to the incentive fee hurdle. At each of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, approximately $1.9 million and $2.1 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TICC Management.

Interest expense was approximately $1.3 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 compared to approximately $1.2 million for the same quarter in the prior year, as a result of the higher average level of borrowings outstanding under our credit facility during the second quarter of 2008. The average interest rate on the amounts borrowed was approximately 4.23% as of June 30, 2008 compared with 7.16% as of the comparable period in 2007. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, approximately $57,000 and $310,000 of interest expense under our credit facility remained payable. Approximately $55.0 million was outstanding under the credit facility as of August 8, 2008.

Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and consulting fees, were approximately $376,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared to approximately $191,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2007. This increase was the result of greater valuation fees of approximately $107,000, legal costs of approximately $70,000 and audit fees of approximately $9,000 incurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2008.

Compensation expenses were approximately $222,000 for the quarter ended June 30, 2008, compared to approximately $200,000 for the quarter ending June 30, 2007, reflecting the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our Chief Financial Officer, our Controller, and other administrative support personnel. The increase of approximately $22,000 reflects a higher accrual for estimated bonuses. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, approximately $204,000 and $0 of compensation expenses remained payable.

General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of directors’ fees, insurance, transfer agent and custodian fees, office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, were approximately $539,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008 compared to approximately $308,000 for the same period in 2007. This increase was primarily a result of greater bank fees of approximately $152,000 associated with our senior secured revolving credit facility as well as greater printing costs of approximately $30,000. Office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the administration agreement with BDC Partners.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments

For the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we had net realized gains on investments of approximately $933,000. During this period, we realized a capital gain of approximately $1.6 million due to the repayment on our debt and sale of our equity investment in Aviel Services, Inc. This gain was partially offset by realized losses associated with the sale of several of our debt investments in broadly syndicated loans of approximately $700,000. For the three months ended June 30, 2007, we had a realized gain of approximately $237,000.

During the quarter ended June 30, 2008, we incurred net unrealized depreciation of approximately $955,000, largely due to the write-downs of several of our investments in broadly syndicated loans of approximately $3.3 million and the reversal of previously recorded unrealized appreciation associated with the repayment of our debt and equity investment in Aviel Services, Inc. ($1.6 million). This was partially offset by unrealized appreciation associated with the reversal of previously recorded unrealized depreciation as a result of the sale of several of our investments in broadly syndicated loans of approximately $2.0 million as well as unrealized appreciation associated with write-ups of several of our bilateral investments (approximately $2.0 million). For the three months ended June 30, 2007, we had net unrealized depreciation of approximately $6.8 million.

Please see “—Portfolio Grading” above for more information.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

We had a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $5.7 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 compared to a net increase of approximately $0.4 million for the comparable period in 2007. This increase was attributable directly to decreased net unrealized depreciation on investments.

Based on a weighted-average of 22,708,251 shares outstanding (basic and diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share for the quarter ended June 30, 2008 was approximately $0.25 for basic and diluted, compared to a net increase in net assets of approximately $0.02 per share for the same period in 2007.

As required by Statement of Financials Accounting Standards No. 128 - Earnings per Share, or SFAS 128, as a result of the rights offering which closed in June 2008, the number of weighted average shares of common stock outstanding for basic and diluted earnings per share have been increased retroactively by a factor of 1.021% for all prior periods presented. This factor represents the impact of the bonus element of the rights offering on our common stock.

Set forth below is a comparison of our results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2008 to the six months ended June 30, 2007.

Investment Income

Investment income for the six months ended June 30, 2008 was approximately $21.6 million compared to approximately $20.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This increase resulted primarily from our portfolio investing activities throughout 2007 and through the second quarter of 2008, as our debt investment portfolio increased in principal value from $333.8 million to $359.9 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2008 investment income consisted of approximately $19.9 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $1.0 million in amortization of original issue discount and approximately $125,000 in cash interest from cash and cash equivalents.

For the six months ended June 30, 2007, investment income consisted of approximately $17.8 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $372,000 in PIK interest from two debt investments, approximately $810,000 in amortization of original issue discount, and approximately $225,000 in cash interest from cash and cash equivalents.

For the six months ended June 30, 2008, other income of approximately $531,000 was recorded, consisting primarily of non-recurring amendment fees earned in connection with existing portfolio investments, compared to other income of approximately $1.3 million for the same period in 2007.

Operating Expenses

Operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2008 were approximately $9.5 million compared to approximately $7.0 million for the six months ended June 30, 2007. This amount consisted of investment advisory fees, interest expense, professional fees, compensation expense, and general and administrative expenses. The increase of approximately $2.5 million over the same period in 2007, was attributable primarily to an increase of approximately $1.1 million in interest expense, greater investment advisory fees of approximately $662,000 and an increase of approximately $738,000 million in professional fees and general and administrative expenses.

The investment advisory fee for six months ended 2008 was approximately $4.1 million, representing the base fee for the period as provided for in the investment advisory agreement as well as income incentive fees earned of approximately $413,000. The investment advisory fee in the comparable period in 2007 was approximately $3.4 million which consisted of the base fee for the period as well as incentive fees of approximately $119,000. The increase of approximately $662,000 is due to an increase in average gross assets and the increase in pre-incentive fee net investment income compared to the incentive fee hurdle. At each of June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, approximately $1.9 million and $2.1 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TICC Management.

Interest expense was approximately $3.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to approximately $2.2 million for the same period in the prior year, as a result of the higher level of borrowings outstanding under our credit facility. The average interest rate on the amounts borrowed was approximately 4.23% as of June 30, 2008 compared with 7.16% as of the comparable period in 2007. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, approximately $57,000 and $310,000 of interest expense under our credit facility remained payable. Approximately $55.0 million was outstanding under the credit facility as of August 8, 2008.

Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and consulting fees, were approximately $726,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to approximately $443,000 for same period in 2007. The increase is primarily related to increased valuation fees of approximately $160,000, greater legal fees of approximately $138,000 for general corporate matters, partially offset by lower auditing fees of approximately $11,000.

Compensation expense was approximately $444,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008, compared to approximately $400,000 for the comparable period in 2007, reflecting the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our Chief Financial Officer, our Controller, and other administrative support personnel. The increase of approximately $44,000 from 2007 reflects higher base salaries as well as an increased year-to-date accrual of estimated bonuses. At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, approximately $204,000 and $0 of compensation expenses remained payable.

General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of directors’ fees, insurance, transfer agent and custodian fees, office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, were approximately $935,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to approximately $479,000 for the same period in 2007. This increase was primarily a result of bank fees associated with our senior secured revolving credit facility in 2008 and higher printing and facility costs. Office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the administration agreement with BDC Partners.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments

For the six months ended June 30, 2008, we had net realized gains on investments of approximately $899,000. During this period, we realized a capital gain of approximately $1.6 million on our investment Aviel Services, Inc. This gain was partially offset by realized losses of approximately $700,000 associated with the sale of several of our broadly syndicated loans. For the six months ended June 30, 2007, we had net unrealized appreciation of approximately $94,000.

During the six months ended June 30, 2008, we recorded net unrealized depreciation on investments of approximately $23.4 million, largely due to write-downs of our debt investments in CAPS term A and B notes ($7.2 million) and WHITTMANHART, Inc. ($3.6 million). We also recorded unrealized depreciation on our non-bilateral investments of approximately $10.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 due in part to changes in the interest rate environment and the credit markets generally. In addition, we experienced net unrealized depreciation on other bilateral investments in an aggregate amount of approximately $2.4 million. The primary components of this net unrealized depreciation are: Pulvermedia (recovery of $1.8 million resulting in a reduction of cost and corresponding unrealized gain), Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (unrealized gain on debt investment of $1.5 million), and net unrealized depreciation on all other bilateral investments of approximately $5.7 million. For the six months ended June, 2007, we had net unrealized depreciation of approximately $9.8 million.

Please see “—Portfolio Grading” above for more information.

Net (Decrease) Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

We had a net decrease in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $10.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2008 compared to a net increase of approximately $3.8 million for the comparable period in 2007. This decrease was attributable primarily to higher net unrealized depreciation on investments, which offset improved net investment income performance.

Based on a weighted-average of 22,363,146 shares outstanding (basic and diluted), the net decrease in net assets resulting from operations per common share for six months ended June 30, 2008 was approximately ($0.47), compared to an increase in net assets of approximately $0.19 per share for the same period in 2007.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

During the six months ended June 30, 2008, cash and cash equivalents increased from approximately $7.9 million at the beginning of the period to approximately $15.4 million at the end of the period. Net cash provided by operating activities for the period, consisting primarily of the items described in “—Results of Operations,” was approximately $65.4 million, largely reflecting principal repayments and proceeds from the sale of investments of approximately $70.4 million, and net investment income partially offset by new investments of approximately $18.3 million. During the period, net cash used in financing activities was approximately $58.0 million, reflecting the distribution of dividends of approximately $12.4 million and approximately $77.0 million for the repayment of amounts borrowed under our current revolving credit facility, partially offset by the net proceeds from the issuance of common stock of approximately $20.9 million and amounts borrowed under the credit facility of approximately $10.5 million.

Contractual Obligations

The following table shows our significant contractual obligations for the repayment of outstanding borrowings under our senior secured revolving credit facility as of June 30, 2008.


	Payments Due By Year (dollars in millions)
	Total		2008		2009
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility⁽¹⁾	$	70.0	$	—	$	70.0

⁽¹⁾

At June 30, 2008, $80.0 million remained unused under our senior secured revolving credit facility. Pursuant to our request and in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, the amount under the Credit Facility was reduced from $150 million to $55 million, effective August 6, 2008. We repaid $15 million under the Credit Facility subsequent to June 30, 2008. We continue to discuss the replacement or extension of our existing credit facility with a range of financial institutions including our current providers.

In addition, we have certain obligations with respect to the investment advisory and administration services we receive. See “–Overview”. We incurred approximately $4.1 million for investment advisory services and $0.9 million for administrative services for the six months ended June 30, 2008.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements, including any risk management of commodity pricing or other hedging practices.

Borrowings

At June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively, we had outstanding borrowings of $70.0 million and $136.5 million, respectively, under our senior secured revolving credit facility. The following table shows the facility amounts and outstanding borrowings at June 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007:


	June 30, 2008				December 31, 2007
	Facility Amount		Amount Outstanding		Facility Amount		Amount Outstanding
	(dollars in millions)		(dollars in millions)		(dollars in millions)		(dollars in millions)
Senior Secured Revolving Credit Facility	$	150.0	$	70.0	$	150.0	$	136.5

On May 18, 2005, we entered into an uncommitted $35 million senior secured revolving credit facility (the “Credit Facility”) with Bayerishe Hypo-Und Vereinsbank AG (“HVB”), as administrative agent and lender. On October 13, 2005, we entered into an agreement to increase the Credit Facility from $35 million to $100 million through February 2006, with Royal Bank of Canada (“RBC”) as an additional lender. Effective February 16, 2006, we entered into an agreement pursuant to which RBC replaced HVB as administrative agent under our Credit Facility. Concurrent with its appointment, RBC agreed to make $40 million available under the Credit Facility.

On April 11, 2006, we entered into an amended and restated Credit Facility, with RBC as an agent and a lender, and Branch Banking and Trust Company (“BB&T”) as an additional lender. Under the amended and restated Credit Facility, the amount of our Credit Facility was increased to $100 million, with each lender providing $50 million under the facility. The Credit Facility supplements our equity capital and provides funding for additional portfolio investments, as well as general corporate matters. On May 7, 2007, the Credit Facility was amended to increase the amount available to $150 million. On June 27, 2007, the Credit Facility was further amended to increase the amount available to $180 million and to add Commerzbank AG (“Commerzbank”) as an additional lender.

Pursuant to further amendment entered into on January 31, 2008, Commerzbank was removed as a lender and the Credit Facility was decreased to $150 million. All amounts borrowed under the Credit Facility will mature, and all accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable within one year of the date of the borrowing; the Credit Facility has a termination date of January 29, 2009.

Pursuant to our request and in accordance with the terms of the Credit Facility, the amount under the Credit Facility was reduced from $150 million to $55 million, effective August 6, 2008. We repaid $15 million under the Credit Facility subsequent to June 30, 2008. We continue to discuss the replacement or extension of our existing credit facility with a range of financial institutions including our current providers.

Under the Credit Facility we must satisfy, monthly, several portfolio covenant requirements including minimum market value, weighted average maturity, and weighted average coupon rate of all secured transaction assets, as well as limitations on the principal amounts of eligible transaction assets. In addition, we must comply with other general covenants including indebtedness, liens and pledges, restricted payments, mergers and consolidations and transactions with affiliates.

Distributions

In order to qualify as a regulated investment company and to avoid corporate level tax on the income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required, under Subchapter M of the Code, to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains to our stockholders on an annual basis.

The following table reflects the cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital, if any, per share that we have declared on our common stock to date:


Date Declared	Record Date	Payment Date	Amount
Fiscal 2008
July 31, 2008	September 10, 2008	September 30, 2008	$	0.20
May 1, 2008	June 16, 2008	June 30, 2008		0.30
March 11, 2008	March 21, 2008	March 31, 2008		0.36	⁽¹⁾

Total (2008)				0.86

Fiscal 2007
October 25, 2007	December 10, 2007	December 31, 2007		0.36
July 26, 2007	September 7, 2007	September 28, 2007		0.36
April 30, 2007	June 8, 2007	June 29, 2007		0.36
February 27, 2007	March 9, 2007	March 30, 2007		0.36

Total (2007)				1.44	⁽²⁾

Fiscal 2006
December 20, 2006	December 29, 2006	January 17, 2007		0.12
October 26, 2006	December 8, 2006	December 29, 2006		0.34
July 26, 2006	September 8, 2006	September 29, 2006		0.32
April 26, 2006	June 9, 2006	June 30, 2006		0.30
February 9, 2006	March 10, 2006	March 31, 2006		0.30

Total (2006)				1.38

Fiscal 2005
December 7, 2005	December 30, 2005	January 18, 2006		0.12
October 27, 2005	December 9, 2005	December 30, 2005		0.30
July 27, 2005	September 10, 2005	September 30, 2005		0.25
April 27, 2005	June 10, 2005	June 30, 2005		0.20
February 9, 2005	March 10, 2005	March 31, 2005		0.14

Total (2005)				1.01

Fiscal 2004
October 27, 2004	December 10, 2004	December 31, 2004		0.11
July 28, 2004	September 10, 2004	September 30, 2004		0.11
May 5, 2004	June 10, 2004	June 30, 2004		0.11
February 2, 2004	March 15, 2004	April 5, 2004		0.10

Total (2004)				0.43	⁽³⁾

Total Distributions:			$	5.12	⁽⁴⁾

⁽¹⁾

Through June 30, 2008, we paid a dividend of $0.66 per share. For tax purposes, we expect that dividends for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 will be funded primarily from undistributed net investment income. However, for the six months ended June 30, 2008, we had net investment of approximately $0.54 per share, compared to aggregate distributions to stockholders of approximately $0.66 per share during the period. Management monitors available

taxable earnings, including net investment income and realized capital gains, to determine if a tax return of capital may occur for the year. To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to our stockholders. The tax character of distributions will be determined at the end of the fiscal year. However, if the character of such distributions were determined as of June 30, 2008, approximately $0.12 per share of our distributions would have been characterized as a tax return of capital to our stockholders. We cannot assure you that a portion of our distributions for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008 will not be characterized as a tax return of capital.

⁽²⁾	Includes a return of capital of approximately $0.02 per share for tax purposes.

⁽³⁾	Includes a return of capital of approximately $0.10 per share for tax purposes.

⁽⁴⁾	We did not declare a dividend for the period ended December 31, 2003.

Related Parties

We have a number of business relationships with affiliated or related parties, including the following:

•

We have entered into an Investment Advisory Agreement with TICC Management. TICC Management is controlled by BDC Partners, its managing member. In addition to BDC Partners, TICC Management is owned by Royce & Associates as the non-managing member. BDC Partners, as the managing member of TICC Management, manages the business and internal affairs of TICC Management. In addition, BDC Partners provides us with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to the Administration Agreement.

•

Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal currently serve as Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC, an investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund, established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. BDC Partners is the managing member, and Royce & Associates is a non-managing member, of T2 Advisers, LLC. In addition, Mr. Conroy serves as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer for both T2 Income Fund Limited and T2 Advisers, LLC. Messrs. Rosenthal and Conroy also each serve as a non-independent director of T2 Income Fund Limited.

Both we and T2 Income Fund Limited have adopted a policy with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities in view of these potential conflicts of interest. Bilateral investment opportunities are those negotiated directly between us or T2 Income Fund Limited and a prospective portfolio company. Our general policy is to allocate bilateral US-based opportunities to TICC and bilateral non-US opportunities to T2 Income Fund Limited; provided, that in instances involving bilateral investment opportunities where there is a significant question as to a prospective portfolio company’s primary base of operation (by virtue, for instance, of it conducting business in many countries, including the United States, with no clear principal center of operation or legal domicile), and where that question leads to doubt with regard to an investment in that company representing a “qualified asset” for the purpose of compliance with the “70% test” for qualifying assets for BDCs under Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, that bilateral investment opportunity will be allocated to T2 Income Fund Limited.

In those instances where purchases of syndicated loans (i.e., those transactions in which an agent bank syndicates loans to four or more investors) are determined to meet the investment criteria of both TICC and T2 Income Fund Limited, those purchases will be allocated on a pro rata basis between TICC and T2 Income Fund Limited based on order size as determined collectively by each fund’s investment adviser. In instances where both TICC and T2 Income Fund Limited’s desire to sell the same position at the same time, sales will likewise be allocated on a pro rata basis based on order size. All such allocations shall only be made, however, to the extent consistent with current interpretations of law applicable to such investments. Further, to the extent pro rata allocations in accordance herewith would cause either TICC or T2 Income Fund Limited to violate any statutory, regulatory or pre-existing contractual provisions to which it is subject, then such allocations will be made on as near a pro rata basis as is practicable without violating such statutory, regulatory or pre-existing contractual provisions. In those instances where either T2 Income Fund Limited or TICC is unable to make a particular investment by reason of law, regulation, statute or pre-existing contractual agreement, that opportunity shall be made available to the other entity.

In addition, we have adopted a formal Code of Ethics that governs the conduct of our officers and directors. Our officers and directors also remain subject to the fiduciary obligations imposed by both the 1940 Act and applicable state corporate law. Finally, we pay BDC Partners our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Controller and other administrative support personnel, which creates conflicts of interest that our Board of Directors must monitor.

RECENT DEVELOPMENTS

On July 31, 2008, the Board of Directors declared a distribution of $0.20 per share for the third quarter, payable on September 30, 2008 to shareholders of record as of September 10, 2008.

ITEM 3.

QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. As of June 30, 2008, one debt investment in our portfolio was at a fixed rate, and the remaining twenty-seven debt investments were at variable rates, representing approximately $14.4 million and $345.5 million in principal debt, respectively. The variable rates are based upon the five-year Treasury note or LIBOR, and generally reset each year. We expect that future debt investments will generally be made at variable rates. In addition, we have an uncommitted revolving credit agreement which carries variable rate interest charges when drawn. Because we fund a portion of our investments with borrowings, our net increase in net assets resulting from operations is affected by the spread between the rate at which we invest and the rate at which we borrow. We attempt to match-fund our liabilities and assets by financing variable rate assets with variable rate borrowings.

To illustrate the potential impact of a change in the underlying interest rate on our net increase in net assets resulting from operations, we have assumed a 1% increase in the underlying five-year Treasury note or LIBOR for all variable rate debt investments on accrual status, and no other change in our portfolio as of June, 2008. We have also assumed a borrowing of $70.0 million under the credit facility. Under this analysis, net investment income would increase approximately $2.5 million annually. Although management believes that this analysis is indicative of our existing interest rate sensitivity, it does not adjust for changes in the credit quality, size and composition of our portfolio, and other business developments, including borrowing under the credit facility, that could affect the net increase in stockholders’ equity resulting from operations. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the results under this hypothetical analysis.

We may in the future hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the investments in our portfolio with fixed interest rates.

ITEM 4.

CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.

As of June 30, 2008, we, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective in timely alerting management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of material information about us required to be included in periodic SEC filings.

There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that occurred during the quarter ended June 30, 2008 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

PART II—OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1.

LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings, nor, to our knowledge, is any material legal proceeding threatened against us. From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings incidental to the normal course of our business including the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our business, financial condition or results of operations.

ITEM 1A.

RISK FACTORS

An investment in our securities involves certain risks relating to our structure and investment objectives. The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face, and we face other risks which we have not yet identified, which we do not currently deem material or which are not yet predictable. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS AND STRUCTURE

Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a business development company would reduce our operating flexibility.

If we do not remain a business development company, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility.

We are dependent upon TICC Management’s key management personnel for our future success, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen and Saul B. Rosenthal.

We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the senior management of TICC Management. The senior management, together with other investment professionals, will evaluate, negotiate, structure, close, monitor and service our investments. Our future success will depend to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of the senior management team, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of TICC Management, and Saul B. Rosenthal, the President and Chief Operating Officer of TICC Management. Neither Mr. Cohen nor Mr. Rosenthal will devote all of their business time to our operations, and both will have other demands on their time as a result of their other activities. Neither Mr. Cohen nor Mr. Rosenthal is subject to an employment contract. The departure of either of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to manage our future growth effectively.

Our ability to achieve our investment objective will depend on our ability to grow, which will depend, in turn, on our investment adviser’s ability to identify, analyze, invest in and finance companies that meet our investment criteria, and our ability to raise and retain debt and equity capital. Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our investment adviser’s structuring of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and our access to financing on acceptable terms.

We and TICC Management, through its managing member, BDC Partners, will need to continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. Failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.

A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make in technology-related companies. We compete with a large number of private equity and venture capital funds, other equity and non-equity based investment funds, including other business development companies, investment banks and other sources of financing, including traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and specialty finance companies. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than us and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. There can be no assurance that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.

Our business model depends upon the development and maintenance of strong referral relationships with private equity and venture capital funds and investment banking firms.

If we fail to maintain our relationships with key firms, or if we fail to establish strong referral relationships with other firms or other sources of investment opportunities, we will not be able to grow our portfolio of loans and achieve our investment objective. In addition, persons with whom we have informal relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and therefore there is no assurance that such relationships will lead to the origination of debt or other investments.

We may not realize gains from our equity investments.

When we invest in debt securities, we generally expect to acquire warrants or other equity securities as well. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.

Because our investments are generally not in publicly traded securities, there is uncertainty regarding the value of our investments, which could adversely affect the determination of our net asset value.

Our portfolio investments are generally not in publicly traded securities. As a result, the fair value of these securities is not readily determinable. We value these securities at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors based upon the recommendation of the Board’s Valuation Committee. In connection with that determination, members of TICC Management’s portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. We also utilize the services of a third party valuation firm which prepares valuations for each of our bilateral portfolio securities that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company (i) have a book value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a book value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 1% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of the third party valuations of our bilateral portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly. However, the Board of Directors retains ultimate authority as to the appropriate valuation of each investment. The types of factors that the Valuation Committee takes into account in providing its fair value recommendation to the Board of Directors includes, as relevant, the nature and value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to valuations of publicly traded companies, comparisons to recent sales of comparable companies, the discounted value of the cash flows of the portfolio company and other relevant factors. Because such valuations are inherently uncertain and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would be assessed if a readily available market for these securities existed.

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

As stated above, our investments are generally not in publicly traded securities. Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. Also, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments.

In addition, because we generally invest in debt securities with a term of up to seven years and generally intend to hold such investments until maturity of the debt, we do not expect realization events, if any, to occur in the near-term. We expect that our holdings of equity securities may require several years to appreciate in value, and we can offer no assurance that such appreciation will occur.

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly results.

We may experience fluctuations in our quarterly operating results due to a number of factors, including the rate at which we make new investments, the interest rates payable on the debt securities we acquire, the default rate on such securities, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.

Many of the companies in which we have made or will make investments may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions. An economic slowdown may affect the ability of a company to repay our loans or engage in a liquidity event such as a sale, recapitalization, or initial public offering. Our nonperforming assets are likely to increase and the value of our portfolio is likely to decrease during these periods. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of any collateral securing some of our loans. These conditions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in our revenues, net income, and assets. For example, during 2007 and the first quarter of 2008 we experienced significant losses on five of our portfolio investments, including GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. ($14.9 million), Falcon Communications, Inc. ($9.5 million), Pulvermedia, Inc. ($10.6 million), WHITTMANHART, Inc. ($3.6 million) and CAPS Group team A and B notes ($7.0 million), each of which was in part attributable to worsening economic conditions in the industries in which those portfolio companies operate.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of the portfolio company’s loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize the portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if a portfolio company goes bankrupt, even though we may have

structured our investment as senior debt or secured debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant “managerial assistance,” if any, to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. These events could harm our financial condition and operating results.

Any unrealized losses we experience on our investment portfolio may be an indication of future realized losses, which could reduce our income available for distribution.

As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors. Decreases in the market values or fair values of our investments will be recorded as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized losses in our investment portfolio could be an indication of a portfolio company’s inability to meet its repayment obligations to us with respect to the affected investments. This could result in realized losses in the future and ultimately in reductions of our income available for distribution in future periods.

Even in the event the value of your investment declines, the management fee and, in certain circumstances, the incentive fee will still be payable.

The management fee is calculated as 2.0% of the value of our gross assets at a specific time. Accordingly, the management fee will be payable regardless of whether the value of our gross assets and/or your investment have decreased. Moreover, a portion of the incentive fee is payable if our net investment income for a calendar quarter exceeds a designated hurdle rate. This portion of the incentive fee is payable without regard to any capital gain, capital loss or unrealized depreciation that may occur during the quarter. Accordingly, this portion of our adviser’s incentive fee may also be payable notwithstanding a decline in net asset value that quarter. In addition, in the event we recognize deferred loan interest income in excess of our available capital as a result of our receipt of payment-in-kind, or “PIK” interest, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to pay a portion of the incentive fee. TICC Management, however, is not required to reimburse us for the portion of any incentive fees attributable to deferred loan interest income in the event of a subsequent default.

We borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us.

As of December 31, 2007 we had $180.0 million available to us under a credit facility, of which we had borrowed approximately $136.5 million. As of January 31, 2008, our credit facility was reduced to $150.0 million. At June 30, 2008, we had borrowed approximately $70.0 million, and we currently have drawn approximately $55.0 million under our credit facility as of August 8, 2008. Royal Bank of Canada, or RBC, serves as administrative agent under our credit facility, and RBC and Branch Banking and Trust Company, or BB&T, each serve as a lender under our credit facility. Pursuant to the Company’s request and in accordance with the terms of the credit facility, the amount under the credit facility was reduced from $150 million to $55 million, effective August 6, 2008.

Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and, therefore, increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. We may borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks, insurance companies, and other lenders. Lenders of these senior securities have fixed dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common shareholders. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock dividend payments. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique. Our ability to service any debt that we incur will depend largely on our financial performance and will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. Moreover, as the management fee payable to TICC Management will be payable on our gross assets, including those assets acquired through the use of leverage, TICC Management may have a financial incentive to incur leverage which may not be consistent with our stockholders’ interests. In addition, our common stockholders will bear the burden of any increase in our expenses as a result of leverage, including any increase in the management fee payable to TICC Management.

Regulations governing our operation as a business development company affect our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital, which may expose us to risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage.

Our business will require a substantial amount of capital, which we may acquire from the following sources:

Senior Securities and Other Indebtedness

We issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business development company, to issue senior securities in amounts such that our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% of gross assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, after each issuance of senior securities. This requirement of sustaining a 200% asset coverage ratio limits the amount that we may borrow. Because we will continue to need capital to grow our loan and investment portfolio, this limitation may prevent us from incurring debt. Further additional debt financing may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, or may be restricted by the terms of our debt facilities. If we are unable to incur additional debt, we may be required to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so.

As a result of the issuance of senior securities, including preferred stock and debt securities, we are exposed to typical risks associated with leverage, including an increased risk of loss and an increase in expenses, which are ultimately borne by our common stockholders. Because we incur leverage to make investments, a decrease in the value of our investments would have a greater negative impact on the value of our common stock. When we issue debt securities or preferred stock, it is likely that such securities will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. In addition, such securities may be rated by rating agencies, and in obtaining a rating for such securities, we may be required to abide by operating and investment guidelines that could further restrict our operating flexibility.

Our ability to pay dividends or issue additional senior securities would be restricted if our asset coverage ratio was not at least 200%. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. In addition, our credit facility is scheduled to expire in January 2009 and we have not yet received a written offer for extension of our credit facility from our existing lenders. If our facility is not renewed or extended, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and repay our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. Furthermore, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness would not be available for distributions to our common stockholders.

Common Stock

We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then-current net asset value of our common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of TICC and its stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In certain limited circumstances, pursuant to an SEC staff interpretation, we may also issue shares at a price below net asset value in connection with a transferable rights offering so long as: (1) the offer does not discriminate among shareholders; (2) we use our best efforts to ensure an adequate trading market exists for the rights; and (3) the ratio of the offering does not exceed one new share for each three rights held. If we raise additional funds by issuing more common stock or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders at that time would decrease and they may experience dilution. Moreover, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to issue and sell additional equity securities in the future, on favorable terms or at all.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to reclassify any unissued shares of stock into one or more classes of preferred stock, which could convey special rights and privileges to its owners.

Our charter permits our Board of Directors to reclassify any authorized but unissued shares of stock into one or more classes of preferred stock. We are currently authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 26,189,851 shares are issued and outstanding as of June 30, 2008. In the event our Board of Directors opts to reclassify a portion of our unissued shares of common stock into a class of preferred stock, those preferred shares would have a preference over our common stock with respect to dividends and liquidation. The cost of any such reclassification would be borne by our existing common stockholders. The class voting rights of any preferred shares we may issue could make it more difficult for us to take some actions that may, in the future, be proposed by the Board of Directors and/or the holders of our common stock, such as a merger, exchange of securities, liquidation, or alteration of the rights of a class of our securities, if these actions were perceived by the holders of preferred shares as not in their best interests. The issuance of preferred shares convertible into shares of common stock might also reduce the net income and net asset value per share of our common stock upon conversion. These effects, among others, could have an adverse effect on your investment in our common stock.

A change in interest rates may adversely affect our profitability.

A portion of our income will depend upon the difference between the rate at which we borrow funds and the interest rate on the debt securities in which we invest. We anticipate using a combination of equity and long-term and short-term borrowings to finance our investment activities. At June 30, 2008, we had borrowed approximately $70.0 million, and we

currently have drawn approximately $55.0 million under our credit facility as of August 8, 2008. RBC serves as administrative agent under our credit facility, and RBC and BB&T each serve as a lender under our credit facility. Some of our investments in debt securities are at fixed rates and others at variable rates. Although we have not done so in the past, we may in the future choose to hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts, subject to applicable legal requirements. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, we have limited experience in entering into hedging transactions, and we will initially have to purchase or develop such expertise if we choose to employ hedging strategies in the future.

We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to qualify as a RIC.

To remain entitled to the tax benefits accorded to RICs under the Code, we must meet certain income source, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. In order to qualify as a RIC, we must derive each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities. The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis. Because we currently maintain a credit facility, and we may use additional debt financing in the future, we may be subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the annual distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for special tax treatment as a RIC and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income tax on all our income. To qualify as a RIC, we must also meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason and remain or become subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and our stockholders.

We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

For federal income tax purposes, we will include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, or contracted PIK interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. A significant portion of our interest income from debt investments since our inception has been attributable to PIK interest received from our debt investments that contain a PIK provision. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash.

Because in certain cases we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty satisfying the annual distribution requirement applicable to RICs. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or reduce new investments to meet these distribution requirements. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus be subject to corporate-level income tax.

There are significant potential conflicts of interest, which could impact our investment returns.

In the course of our investing activities, we pay management and incentive fees to TICC Management, and reimburse BDC Partners for certain expenses it incurs. As a result, investors in our common stock invest on a “gross” basis and receive distributions on a “net” basis after expenses, resulting in, among other things, a lower rate of return than one might achieve through direct investments. As a result of this arrangement, there may be times when the management team of TICC Management has interests that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict.

TICC Management receives a quarterly incentive fee based, in part, on our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income,” if any, for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. This incentive fee is subject to a quarterly hurdle rate before providing an incentive fee return to TICC Management. To the extent we or TICC Management are able to exert influence over our portfolio companies, the quarterly pre-incentive fee may provide TICC Management with an incentive to induce our portfolio companies to accelerate or defer interest or other obligations owed to us from one calendar quarter to another.

In addition, our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of TICC Management, and its managing member, BDC Partners, serve or may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in a line of business similar to our own. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. For example, Steven P. Novak, one of our independent directors, is the President of Palladio Capital Management, LLC, the manager of an equity-oriented hedge fund. Charles M. Royce, the non-executive Chairman of our Board of Directors, is the President and Chief Investment Officer of Royce & Associates, the non-managing member of our investment adviser.

Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal also currently serve as Chief Executive Officer, and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC, an investment adviser to T2 Income Fund Limited, a Guernsey fund, established and operated for the purpose of investing in bilateral transactions and syndicated loans across a variety of industries globally. BDC Partners is the managing member, and Royce & Associates is a non-managing member, of T2 Advisers, LLC. In addition, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Treasurer and Corporate Secretary of TICC Management, BDC Partners and TICC, serves as Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer for both T2 Income Fund Limited and T2 Advisers, LLC. Messrs. Rosenthal and Conroy also each serve as a non-independent director of T2 Income Fund Limited. Because of these possible conflicts of interest, these individuals may direct potential business and investment opportunities to other entities rather than to us or such individuals may undertake or otherwise engage in activities or conduct on behalf of such other entities that is not in, or which may be adverse to, our best interests.

Both we and T2 Income Fund Limited have adopted a policy with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities in view of these potential conflicts of interest. Bilateral investment opportunities are those negotiated directly between us or T2 Income Fund Limited and a prospective portfolio company. Our general policy is to allocate bilateral US-based opportunities to TICC and bilateral non-US opportunities to T2 Income Fund Limited; provided, that in an instances involving bilateral investment opportunities where there is significant question as to a prospective portfolio company’s primary base of operation (by virtue, for instance, of it conducting business in many countries, including the United States, with no clear principal center of operation or legal domicile), and where that question leads to doubt with regard to an investment in that company representing a “qualified asset” for the purpose of compliance with the “70% test” for qualifying assets for BDCs under Section 55(a) of the 1940 Act, that bilateral investment opportunity will be allocated to T2 Income Fund Limited.

In those instances where purchases of syndicated loans (i.e., those transactions in which an agent bank syndicates loans to four or more investors) are determined to meet the investment criteria of both TICC and T2 Income Fund Limited, those purchases will be allocated on a pro rata basis between TICC and T2 Income Fund Limited based on order size as determined collectively by each fund’s investment adviser. In instances where both TICC and T2 Income Fund Limited desire to sell the same position at the same time, sales will likewise be allocated on a pro rata basis based on order size. All such allocations shall only be made, however, to the extent consistent with current interpretations of law applicable to such investments. Further, to the extent pro rata allocations in accordance herewith would cause either TICC or T2 Income Fund Limited to violate any statutory, regulatory or pre-existing contractual provisions to which it is subject, then such allocations will be made on as near a pro rata basis as is practicable without violating such statutory, regulatory or pre-existing contractual provisions. In those instances where either T2 Income Fund Limited or TICC is unable to make a particular investment by reason of law, regulation, statute or pre-existing contractual agreement, that opportunity shall be made available to the other entity.

In order to minimize the potential conflicts of interest that might arise, we have adopted a policy that prohibits us from making investments in any company in which any fund or other client account managed by Royce & Associates, Palladio Capital Management or T2 Advisers, LLC holds a long or short position. The investment focus of each of these entities tends to be different from our investment objective. Nevertheless, it is possible that new investment opportunities that meet our investment objective may come to the attention of one of these entities in connection with another investment advisory client or program, and, if so, such opportunity might not be offered, or otherwise made available, to us. Also, our investment policy precluding the investments referenced above could cause us to miss out on some investment opportunities. However, our executive officers, directors and investment adviser intend to treat us in a fair and equitable manner over time consistent with their applicable duties under law so that we will not be disadvantaged in relation to any other particular client. In addition, we have adopted a formal Code of Ethics that governs the conduct of our officers and directors. Our officers and directors also remain subject to the fiduciary obligations imposed by both the 1940 Act and applicable state corporate law. Finally, we pay BDC Partners our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”), including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Controller and other administrative support personnel, which creates conflicts of interest that our Board of Directors must monitor.

Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to time. Any change in these laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business.

If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could fail to qualify as a business development company or be precluded from investing according to our current business strategy.

As a business development company, we may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets. See “Business–Regulation as a Business Development Company.”

We believe that most of our portfolio investments will constitute qualifying assets. However, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could lose our status as a business development company, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies (which could result in the dilution of our position) or could require us to dispose of investments at inappropriate times in order to comply with the 1940 Act. If we need to dispose of such investments quickly, it would be difficult to dispose of such investments on favorable terms. For example, we may have difficulty in finding a buyer and, even if we do find a buyer, we may have to sell the investments at a substantial loss.

Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

Our charter and bylaws, as well as certain statutory and regulatory requirements, contain certain provisions that may have the effect of discouraging a third party from making an acquisition proposal for us. These anti- takeover provisions may inhibit a change of control in circumstances that could give the holders of our common stock the opportunity to realize a premium over the market price for our common stock.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INVESTMENTS

Our portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies in the technology-related sector, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt securities that we hold or if the technology-related sector experiences a market downturn.

A consequence of our limited number of investments is that the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly adversely affected if a small number of investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Beyond our income tax asset diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in relatively few issuers On December 3, 2007, we changed our name from Technology Investment Capital Corp. to TICC Capital Corp. As of that date, we no longer maintain a policy to invest, under normal circumstances, at least 80% of the value of our net assets (including the amount of any borrowings for investment purposes) in technology-related companies. We continue to maintain our primary focus, however, on the technology industry, although we have the flexibility to invest outside this sector. As a result, a market downturn in the technology-related sector could materially adversely affect us.

The technology-related sector is subject to many risks, including volatility, intense competition, decreasing life cycles and periodic downturns.

We invest in companies in the technology-related sector, some of which may have relatively short operating histories. The revenues, income (or losses) and valuations of technology-related companies can and often do fluctuate suddenly and dramatically. Also, the technology-related market is generally characterized by abrupt business cycles and intense competition. Beginning in mid-2000, there was substantial excess capacity and a significant slowdown in many industries in the technology-related sector. In addition, this overcapacity, together with a cyclical economic downturn, resulted in substantial decreases in the market capitalization of many technology-related companies. While such valuations have recovered to some extent, we can offer no assurance that such decreases in market capitalizations will not recur, or that any future decreases in technology company valuations will be insubstantial or temporary in nature. Therefore, our portfolio companies may face considerably more risk of loss than companies in other industry sectors.

In addition, because of rapid technological change, the average selling prices of products and some services provided by the technology-related sector have historically decreased over their productive lives. As a result, the average selling prices of products and services offered by our portfolio companies may decrease over time, which could adversely affect their operating results and their ability to meet their obligations under their debt securities, as well as the value of any equity securities, that we may hold. This could, in turn, materially adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Our investments in the technology-related companies that we are targeting may be extremely risky and we could lose all or part of our investments.

Although a prospective portfolio company’s assets are one component of our analysis when determining whether to provide debt capital, we generally do not base an investment decision primarily on the liquidation value of a company’s balance sheet assets. Instead, given the nature of the companies that we invest in, we also review the company’s historical and projected cash flows, equity capital and “soft” assets, including intellectual property (patented and non-patented), databases, business relationships (both contractual and non-contractual) and the like. Accordingly, considerably higher levels of overall risk will likely be associated with our portfolio compared with that of a traditional asset-based lender whose security consists primarily of receivables, inventories, equipment and other tangible assets. Interest rates payable by our portfolio companies may not compensate for these additional risks.

Specifically, investment in the technology-related companies that we are targeting involves a number of significant risks, including:

•

these companies may have limited financial resources and may be unable to meet their obligations under their debt securities that we hold, which may be accompanied by a deterioration in the value of any collateral and a reduction in the likelihood of us realizing any value from the liquidation of such collateral;

•

they typically have limited operating histories, narrower product lines and smaller market shares than larger businesses, which tend to render them more vulnerable to competitors’ actions and market conditions, as well as general economic downturns;

•

because they tend to be privately owned, there is generally little publicly available information about these businesses; therefore, although TICC Management’s agents will perform “due diligence” investigations on these portfolio companies, their operations and their prospects, we may not learn all of the material information we need to know regarding these businesses;

•

they are more likely to depend on the management talents and efforts of a small group of persons; therefore, the death, disability, resignation or termination of one or more of these persons could have a material adverse impact on our portfolio company and, in turn, on us; and

•

they generally have less predictable operating results, may from time to time be parties to litigation, may be engaged in rapidly changing businesses with products subject to a substantial risk of obsolescence, and may require substantial additional capital to support their operations, finance expansion or maintain their competitive position.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize our portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if a portfolio company goes bankrupt, even though we may have structured our interest as senior debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant “managerial assistance” to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors.

Our failure to make follow-on investments in our portfolio companies could impair the value of our portfolio.

Following an initial investment in a portfolio company, we may make additional investments in that portfolio company as “follow-on” investments, in order to: (i) increase or maintain in whole or in part our equity ownership percentage; (ii) exercise warrants, options or convertible securities that were acquired in the original or subsequent financing; or (iii) attempt to preserve or enhance the value of our investment.

We may elect not to make follow-on investments or otherwise lack sufficient funds to make those investments. We have the discretion to make any follow-on investments, subject to the availability of capital resources. The failure to make follow-on investments may, in some circumstances, jeopardize the continued viability of a portfolio company and our initial investment, or may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation. Even if we have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we may elect not to make a follow-on investment because we may not want to increase our concentration of risk, because we prefer other opportunities, or because we are inhibited by compliance with business development company requirements or the desire to maintain our tax status.

Our incentive fee may induce TICC Management to make speculative investments.

The incentive fee payable by us to TICC Management may create an incentive for TICC Management to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee payable to TICC Management is determined, which is calculated as a percentage of the return on invested capital, may encourage TICC Management to use leverage to increase the return on our investments. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly, because TICC Management will receive the incentive fee based, in part, upon the capital gains realized on our investments, the investment adviser may invest more than would otherwise be appropriate in companies whose securities are likely to yield capital gains, as compared to income producing securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during cyclical economic downturns.

Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.

We intend to invest primarily in senior debt securities, but may also invest in subordinated debt securities, issued by our portfolio companies. In some cases portfolio companies will be permitted to have other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt securities in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may provide that the holders thereof are entitled to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of the debt securities in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligations to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt securities in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. In addition, we will not be in a position to control any portfolio company by investing in its debt securities. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree and the management of such companies, as representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not best serve our interests as debt investors.

Because we generally do not hold controlling equity interests in our portfolio companies, we may not be in a position to exercise control over our portfolio companies or to prevent decisions by the managements of our portfolio companies that could decrease the value of our investments.

Although we have taken and may in the future take controlling equity positions in our portfolio companies from time to time, we generally do not do so. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree, and the stockholders and management of a portfolio company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that are adverse to our interests. Due to the lack of liquidity for the debt and equity investments that we typically hold in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our investments in the event we disagree with the actions of a portfolio company, and may therefore suffer a decrease in the value of our investments.

RISKS RELATED TO AN INVESTMENT IN OUR COMMON STOCK

Our common stock price may be volatile.

The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

•

price and volume fluctuations in the overall stock market from time to time;

•

significant volatility in the market price and trading volume of securities of regulated investment companies, business development companies or other financial services companies;

•

changes in regulatory policies or tax guidelines with respect to regulated investment companies or business development companies;

•

actual or anticipated changes in our earnings or fluctuations in our operating results or changes in the expectations of securities analysts;

•

general economic conditions and trends;

•

loss of a major funding source; or

•

departures of key personnel.

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Due to the potential volatility of our stock price, we may therefore be the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.

Our shares may trade at discounts from net asset value or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term.

Shares of closed-end investment companies have frequently traded at a market price that is less than the net asset value that is attributable to those shares. The possibility that our shares of common stock will trade at a discount from net asset value or at premiums that are unsustainable over the long term are separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value will decrease. We cannot predict whether shares of our common stock will trade above, at or below our net asset value. If our common stock trades below its net asset value, we will generally not be able to issue additional shares of our common stock at its market price without first obtaining the approval for such issuance from our stockholders and our independent directors. If additional funds are not available to us, we could be forced to curtail or cease our new lending and investment activities, and our net asset value could decrease and our level of distributions could be impacted. During the second and third quarters of 2004, during the same periods of 2006, during the third and fourth quarters of 2007, and during the first and second quarters of 2008, our shares of common stock traded at a discount to the net asset value attributable to those shares.

There is a risk that you may not receive dividends or that our dividends may not grow over time.

We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. In addition, as a result of de-levering our portfolio, our net investment income is now and will continue to be less than it might otherwise be on a more fully levered portfolio. As a result, our Board has determined to adjust the third quarter distribution to a level more consistent with that idea.

Stockholders may incur dilution if we issue warrants, options or rights to subscribe to, covert to, or purchase shares of our common stock in one or more offerings.

At our 2008 annual meeting of stockholders, our stockholders approved a proposal designed to allow us to access the capital markets in ways that were previously unavailable to us as a result of restrictions that, absent stockholder approval, apply to business development companies under the 1940 Act. Specifically, our stockholders approved a proposal that authorized us to issue warrants, options or rights to subscribe to, covert to, or purchase shares of our common stock in one or more offerings. Any decision to issue warrants, options or rights to subscribe to, covert to, or purchase shares of our common stock would be subject to the determination by our Board of Directors that such issuance is in our and our stockholders’ best interests.

If we were to issue warrants, options or rights to subscribe to, convert to, or purchase shares of our common stock, the exercise or conversion of such securities would increase the number of outstanding shares of our common stock. Any such exercise would be dilutive on the voting power of existing stockholders, and could be dilutive with regard to dividends and our net asset value, and other economic aspects of the common stock. In addition, such convertible securities could be issued with exercise or conversion prices below our current net asset value per share.

Because the applicable exercise or conversion price, the number of shares of common stock that could be so issued and the timing of any issuance is not currently known, the actual dilutive effect cannot be predicted.

ITEM 2.

UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.

While we did not engage in unregistered sales of equity securities during the six months ended June 30, 2008, we issued a total of 286,908 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan. This issuance was not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933. The aggregate valuation price for the shares of common stock issued under the dividend reinvestment plan was approximately $1.8 million.

On June 13, 2008, we closed a transferable right-offering of our common stock. This resulted in a total sale of 4,339,226 shares of our common stock. We raised approximately $20.9 million in net proceeds in this offering, after deducting underwriting discounts and offering expenses. Subsequently, we used the net proceeds received in this offering to repay indebtedness owed under our current revolving credit facility.

ITEM 3.

DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.

Not applicable.

ITEM 4.

SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS.

On June 16, 2008, we held our Annual Meeting of Shareholders in Greenwich, Connecticut. Shareholders voted on four matters; the substance of these matters and the results of the voting of each such matter are described below.

1. Election of Directors: Shareholders elected directors, each of whom will serve for three years, or until his successor is elected and qualified. Votes were cast as follows:


	FOR	WITHHELD
Charles M. Royce	16,419,770	3,713,015
Steven P. Novak	17,800,711	2,332,074

The following directors are continuing as directors of the Company for their respective terms – Jonathan H. Cohen, Tonia L. Pankopf and G. Peter O’Brien.

2. Ratification of selection of independent auditors: To ratify the selection of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP to serve as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2008. Votes were cast as follows:


FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN
18,200,193	1,836,385	96,207

3. Authorization to sell shares of the Company’s common stock below net asset value: Approval to authorize the Company, with approval of its Board of Directors, to sell shares of its common stock at a price or prices below the Company’s then current net asset value per share in one or more offerings. Votes were cast as follows:


FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN	BROKER NON-VOTES
7,301,364	3,301,601	159,233	9,370,588

For the purpose of the third proposal, the broker non-votes had the effect of a vote against the proposal and therefore the third proposal did not receive the required shareholder approval to pass.

4. Approval to authorize the Company to issue warrants, options or rights to subscribe to, covert to, or purchase the Company’s common stock in one or more offerings. Votes were cast as follows:


FOR	AGAINST	ABSTAIN	BROKER NON-VOTES
8,114,493	2,477,738	169,967	9,370,588

ITEM 5.

OTHER INFORMATION.

Not applicable.

ITEM 6.

EXHIBITS.

(a) EXHIBITS

The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC:


3.1		Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on September 23, 2003).

3.2		Articles of Amendment (Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 814-00638) filed December 3, 2007).

3.3		Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on November 19, 2003).

4.1		Form of Share Certificate (Incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on September 23, 2003).

10.1		Form of Amended and Restated Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and Technology Investment Management, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Appendix B to the Registrant’s Proxy Materials on Schedule 14A (File No. 000-50398) filed on May 18, 2004).



10.2		Custodian Agreement between Registrant and State Street Bank and Trust Company (Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on November 19, 2003).

10.3		Administration Agreement between Registrant and BDC Partners, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 2 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on November 19, 2003).

10.4		Dividend Reinvestment Plan (Incorporated by reference to Pre-Effective Amendment No. 1 to the Registrant’s Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on November 6, 2003).

10.5		Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Registrant and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 814-00638) filed on April 14, 2006).

10.6		First Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Registrant and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 814-00638) filed May 9, 2007).

10.7		Second Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Registrant and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 814-00638) filed June 28, 2007).

10.8		Third Amendment to Amended and Restated Credit Agreement between Registrant and Royal Bank of Canada (Incorporated by reference to Current Report on Form 8-K (File No. 814-00638) filed February 5, 2008).

11		Computation of Per Share Earnings (included in the notes to the audited financial statements contained in this report).

31.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

31.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

32.1*		Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32.2*		Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

*	Filed herewith.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.


	TICC CAPITAL CORP.

Date: August 11, 2008	By:	/s/ JONATHAN H. COHEN
		Jonathan H. Cohen
		Chief Executive Officer

Date: August 11, 2008	By:	/s/ PATRICK F. CONROY
		Patrick F. Conroy
		Chief Financial Officer
		( Principal Accounting Officer)