UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549

 

FORM 10-K

 

x		ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE FISCAL YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

OR

o		TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

FOR THE TRANSITION PERIOD FROM          TO         

COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-50398

 

TICC CAPITAL CORP.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

Maryland		20-0188736
(State of Incorporation)		(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)

8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255
Greenwich, CT 06830

(Address of principal executive offices) (Zip Code)

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (203) 983-5275

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Title of Each Class		Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered
Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share		NASDAQ Global Select Market

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:
None

 

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.Yes o No x.

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.Yes o No x.

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes x No o.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of “accelerated filer,” “large accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)		Smaller reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).Yes o No x.

The aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the Registrant on June 28, 2013, based on the closing price on that date of $9.62 on the NASDAQ Global Select Market, was $497,053,846. For the purposes of calculating this amount only, all directors and executive officers of the Registrant have been treated as affiliates. There were 53,400,745 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding as of March 17, 2014.

 

Documents Incorporated by Reference

Portions of the registrant’s definitive Proxy Statement relating to the registrant’s 2014 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission within 120 days following the end of the Company’s fiscal year, are incorporated by reference in Part III of this Annual Report on Form 10-K as indicated herein.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TICC CAPITAL CORP.
FORM 10-K FOR THE FISCAL YEAR
ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2013

TABLE OF CONTENTS

		Page
PART I
ITEM 1. BUSINESS			1
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS			24
ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS			49
ITEM 2. PROPERTIES			49
ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS			49
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES			49
PART II
ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER   MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES			50
ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL AND OTHER DATA			53
ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION   AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS			54
ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK			90
ITEM 8. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA			92
ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH INDEPENDENT REGISTERED   PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL   DISCLOSURE			137
ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES			137
ITEM 9B. OTHER INFORMATION			137
PART III
ITEM 10. DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE			138
ITEM 11. EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION			138
ITEM 12. SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND   MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS			138
ITEM 13. CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR   INDEPENDENCE			138
ITEM 14. PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES			138
PART IV
ITEM 15. EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES			139
SIGNATURES			143

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Item 1. Business

TICC Capital Corp. (“TICC,” “Company,” “we,” “us,” or “our”) is a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a business development company (“BDC”) under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return. Our primary focus is to seek current income by investing primarily in corporate debt securities. Our debt investments may include bilateral loans (loans where we hold the entirety of a particular loan) and syndicated loans (those where multiple investors hold portions of that loan). We have and may continue to invest in structured finance investments, including collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) investment vehicles, that own debt securities. CLO investments may also include warehouse facilities, which are financing structures intended to aggregate loans that may be used to form the basis of a CLO vehicle. We may also invest in publicly traded debt and/or equity securities. As a BDC, we may not acquire any asset other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time we make the acquisition, the value of our qualifying assets represents at least 70% of the value of our total assets.

Our capital is generally used by our portfolio companies to finance organic growth, acquisitions, recapitalizations and working capital. Our investment decisions are based on extensive analysis of potential portfolio companies’ business operations supported by an in-depth understanding of the quality of their recurring revenues and cash flow, variability of costs and the inherent value of their assets, including proprietary intangible assets and intellectual property. In making our CLO investments, we consider the indenture structure for that vehicle, its operating characteristics and compliance with its various indenture provisions, as well as its corporate loan-based collateral pool.

We generally expect to invest between $5.0 million and $50.0 million in each of our portfolio companies, although this investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our capital base changes and market conditions warrant, and accrue interest at fixed or variable rates. We expect that our investment portfolio will be diversified among a large number of investments with few investments, if any, exceeding 5% of the total portfolio.

While the structures of our investments will vary, and while we invest across a wide range of different industries, we have historically overweighted our investments in the debt of technology-related companies. We seek to invest in entities that, as a general matter, have been operating for at least one year prior to the date of our investment and that will, at the time of our investment, have employees and revenues, and are cash flow positive. Many of these companies will have financial backing provided by private equity or venture capital funds or other financial or strategic sponsors at the time we make an investment. The types of portfolio companies in which we invest, however, will generally be considered below investment grade, and their debt securities may in turn be referred to as “junk.” A substantial portion of our investment portfolio consists of debt investments for which issuers are not required to make principal payments until the maturity of the senior loans, which could result in a substantial loss to us if such issuers are unable to refinance or repay their debt at maturity. In addition, many of the debt securities we hold typically contain interest reset provisions that may make it more difficult for a borrower to repay the loan, heightening the risk that we may lose all or part of our investment.

We have historically and may continue to borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we may be exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to our investment adviser, TICC Management, LLC (“TICC Management”), will be borne by our common stockholders.

Securitization Vehicles

On August 10, 2011, we completed a $225.0 million debt securitization financing transaction. The Class A Notes and the subordinated notes offered in the debt securitization were issued by TICC CLO LLC (“2011 Securitization Issuer” or “TICC CLO”), a subsidiary of TICC Capital Corp. 2011-1 Holdings, LLC (“Holdings”), which is in turn a direct subsidiary of TICC. The Class A Notes are secured by the assets

TABLE OF CONTENTS

held by the 2011 Securitization Issuer. The securitization was executed through a private placement of $101.25 million of secured notes rated AAA/Aaa by Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (“S&P”) and Moody’s Investors Service Inc. (“Moody’s”), respectively, and bearing interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.25%. Holdings retained all of the subordinated notes, which totaled $123.75 million (the “2011 Subordinated Notes”), and retained all the membership interests in the 2011 Securitization Issuer.

On August 23, 2012, the Company completed a $160 million debt securitization financing transaction, consisting of $120 million in secured notes and $40 million of subordinated notes. The secured and subordinated notes were issued by TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC (“2012 Securitization Issuer” or “TICC CLO 2012-1”), which is a special purpose vehicle that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of TICC. TICC presently owns all of the subordinated notes (the “2012 Subordinated Notes”) issued in the CLO transaction. On February 25, 2013 and May 28, 2013, TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC issued additional secured notes totaling an aggregate of $120 million and subordinated notes totaling an aggregate of $40 million, which subordinated notes were purchased by the Company, under the “accordion” feature of the debt securitization which allowed, under certain circumstances and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for an increase in the amount of secured and subordinated notes. It is not necessary that the Company own all or any of the notes permitted by this feature, which may affect the accounting treatment of the debt securitization financing transaction.

As of December 31, 2013 the secured notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer have an aggregate face amount of $240.0 million and were issued in four classes. The class A-1 notes have a current face amount of $176.0 million, are rated AAA(sf)/Aaa(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 1.75%. The class B-1 notes have a current face amount of $20.0 million, are rated AA(sf)/Aa2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. The class C-1 notes have a current initial face amount of $23.0 million, are rated A(sf)/A2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 4.75%. The class D-1 notes have a current face amount of $21.0 million, are rated BBB(sf)/Baa2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 5.75%. The LIBOR rate which is the basis of the total interest rate on the secured notes that were issued by the 2012 Securitization Issuer was measured on a six-month basis until February 2013. The secured notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer have a stated maturity date of August 25, 2023 and are subject to a two year non-call period, during which the notes may not be repaid. This CLO has a four year reinvestment period, during which the proceeds from the repayment of its underlying investments may be reinvested in new portfolio securities.

The Company consolidated the results of its subsidiaries, Holdings, TICC CLO and TICC CLO 2012-1, in its consolidated financial statements as the subsidiaries are operated solely for investment activities of the Company, and the Company has substantial equity at risk. The creditors of TICC CLO and TICC CLO 2012-1 have received security interests in the assets owned by TICC CLO and TICC CLO 2012-1, respectively, and such assets are not intended to be available to the creditors of TICC (or any other affiliate of TICC).

Each of the 2011 Securitization Issuer and the 2012 Securitization Issuer are consolidated subsidiaries of TICC. Each was formed to provide us with access to additional capital for investment by permitting us to issue debt securities, through both vehicles, to securitize a portion of our existing portfolio investments, selected by us, that were originated using our typical investment process. The debt securities were issued by such vehicles in connection with their formation in private placement transactions exempt from registration under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”). Each vehicle has the ability to issue additional securities under certain limited circumstances. Specifically, the 2011 Securitization Issuer may be able to issue additional securities through a supplemental indenture approved by the requisite number of noteholders and the 2012 Securitization Issuer is permitted to issue additional securities during a four year reinvestment period.

In addition, because each is a consolidated subsidiary, we did not recognize any gain or loss on the transfer of any of our portfolio assets to such vehicles in connection with the CLO transactions to which they relate. However, while not expressly named, TICC Management, our investment adviser, and BDC Partners, our administrator, may be entitled to indemnification under certain agreements we entered into to serve as collateral manager for both vehicles as a result of their affiliation with us. Although we have no present plans

TABLE OF CONTENTS

to do so, we may elect to securitize additional portfolio investments in the future in a manner similar to the two vehicles we have previously sponsored.

Convertible Notes

On September 26, 2012, we completed a private placement of 5-year unsecured 7.50% Senior Convertible Notes Due 2017 (the “Convertible Notes”). A total of $105.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes were issued at the closing. An additional $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes were issued on October 22, 2012 pursuant to the exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock based on an initial conversion rate of 87.2448 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $11.46 per share of common stock. The conversion price for the Convertible Notes will be reduced for quarterly cash dividends paid to common shares to the extent that the quarterly dividend exceeds $0.29 cents per share, subject to adjustment. The Convertible Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 7.50%, payable semiannually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning May 1, 2013. The Convertible Notes mature on November 1, 2017, unless previously converted in accordance with their terms. The Convertible Notes are our general unsecured obligations, rank equally in right of payment with our future senior unsecured debt, and rank senior in right of payment to any potential subordinated debt, should any be issued in the future.

Organizational and Regulatory Structure

Our investment activities are managed by TICC Management. TICC Management is an investment adviser registered under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended (the “Advisers Act”). TICC Management is owned by BDC Partners, its managing member, and Charles M. Royce, our non-executive Chairman who holds a minority, non-controlling interest in TICC Management. Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, directly or indirectly own or control all of the outstanding equity interests of BDC Partners. Under our investment advisory agreement with TICC Management (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”), we have agreed to pay TICC Management an annual base management fee based on our gross assets as well as an incentive fee based on our performance.

We were founded in July 2003 and completed an initial public offering of shares of our common stock in November 2003. We are a Maryland corporation and a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company that has elected to be regulated as a BDC under the 1940 Act. As a BDC, we are required to meet certain regulatory tests, including the requirement to invest at least 70% of our total assets in eligible portfolio companies. In addition, we have elected to be treated for federal income tax purposes as a regulated investment company (“RIC”) under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Set forth below is a chart detailing our organizational structure.

Our headquarters are located at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, Connecticut and our telephone number is (203) 983-5275.

We file annual, quarterly and current reports, proxy statements and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). You can inspect any materials we file with the SEC, without charge, at the SEC’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Please call the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330 for further information on the Public Reference Room. The information we file with the SEC is available free of charge by contacting us at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, CT 06830 or by telephone at (203) 983-5275 or on our website at http://www.ticc.com. The SEC also maintains a website that contains reports, proxy statements and other information regarding registrants, including us, that file such information electronically with the SEC. The address of the SEC’s web site is http://www.sec.gov. Information contained on our website or on the SEC’s web site about us is not incorporated into this report and you should not consider information contained on our website or on the SEC’s website to be part of this report.

MARKET OPPORTUNITY

Over the past several years, the market for debt and credit-related investments has become more competitive and yields have generally decreased. We expect the market for new corporate debt investments to remain generally competitive in 2014, especially with regard to the larger company portion of the corporate loan market. In view of that perspective, we continue to invest with a focus on smaller broadly-syndicated and middle-market loans, and we continue to be focused on certain structured finance investments, including collateralized loan obligation investment vehicles.

COMPETITIVE ADVANTAGES

We believe that we are well positioned to provide financing to corporate borrowers and structured finance vehicles that, in turn, provide capital to corporate borrowers for the following reasons:

Expertise in credit analysis and monitoring investments

While our investment focus is on middle-market companies, we have invested, and in the future will likely continue to invest, in larger and smaller companies and in other investment structures on an opportunistic basis. Most recently, we have invested in a number of CLO investment vehicles. We believe our experience in analyzing middle-market companies and CLO investment structures, as detailed in the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

biographies of TICC Management’s senior investment professionals, affords us a sustainable competitive advantage over lenders with limited experience in investing in these markets. In particular, we have expertise in evaluating the operating characteristics of middle-market companies as well as the structural features of CLO investments, and monitoring the credit risk of such investments after closing until full repayment.

Established deal sourcing network

Through the investment professionals of TICC Management, we have extensive contacts and sources from which to generate investment opportunities. These contacts and sources include private equity funds,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

companies, brokers and bankers. We believe that senior professionals of TICC Management have developed strong relationships within the investment community over their years within the banking, investment management and equity research field.

INVESTMENT PROCESS

Identification of prospective portfolio companies

We identify and source new prospective portfolio companies through a network of venture capital and private equity funds, investment banks, accounting and law firms and direct company relationships. We have identified several criteria that we believe are important in seeking our investment objective. These criteria provide general guidelines for our investment decisions; however, we do not require each prospective portfolio company in which we choose to invest to meet all or any specific number of these criteria.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Due diligence

Our due diligence process generally includes some or all of the following elements:

Management team and financial sponsor

Business

Financial condition

Structured Finance Vehicles

Contemporaneous with our due diligence process, the investment team prepares a detailed credit memorandum for presentation to our Investment Committee, which currently consists of Messrs. Cohen, Rosenthal and Monasebian. Our Investment Committee reviews and approves each of our portfolio investments.

Investment Structuring

In structuring our investments, we seek to ascertain the asset quality as well as the earnings quality of our prospective portfolio companies. Frequently, we obtain a senior secured position and thus receive a perfected, first priority security interest in substantially all of our portfolio companies’ assets, which entitles us to a preferred position on payments in the event of liquidation, and in many cases a pledge of the equity by the equity owners. It should be noted, however, that because we are not primarily an asset-based lender, in the current economic environment, the value of collateral and security interests may dissipate rapidly. In addition, we seek to structure loan covenants or to participate in syndicated loans that incorporate loan covenants that assist in the management of risk. Our loan documents may include affirmative covenants that require the portfolio company to take specific actions such as periodic financial reporting, notification of material events and compliance with laws, restrictive covenants that prevent portfolio companies from taking a range of significant actions such as incurring additional indebtedness or making acquisitions without our consent, covenants requiring the portfolio company to maintain or achieve specified financial ratios such as debt to cash flow and interest coverage, and operating covenants requiring them to maintain certain operational benchmarks such as minimum revenue or minimum cash flow. Our loan documents also provide protection against customary events of default such as non-payment, breach of covenant, insolvency and change of control.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Senior Debt

The senior debt in which we invest generally holds a senior position in the capital structure of a portfolio company. Such debt may include loans that hold the most senior position, loans that hold an equal ranking with other senior debt, or loans that are, in the judgment of our investment adviser, in the category of senior debt. A senior position in the borrower’s capital structure generally gives the holder of the senior debt a claim on some or all of the borrower’s assets that is senior to that of subordinated debt, preferred stock and common stock in the event the borrower defaults or becomes bankrupt. The senior debt in which we invest may be wholly or partially secured by collateral, or may be unsecured. However, there may be instances in which senior debt held by other investors is in a superior position in the borrower’s capital structure.

Senior Subordinated Debt

Senior subordinated debt is subordinated in its rights to receive its principal and interest payments from the borrower to the rights of the holders of senior debt. As a result, senior subordinated debt is riskier than senior debt. Although such loans are sometimes secured by significant collateral, we principally rely on the borrower’s cash flow for repayment. Additionally, we often receive warrants to acquire shares of stock in borrowers in connection with these loans.

Junior Subordinated Debt

Structurally, junior subordinated debt is subordinate in priority of payment to senior debt (and is often unsecured), but is senior in priority to equity. Junior subordinated debt often has elements of both debt and equity instruments, having the fixed returns associated with senior debt while also providing the opportunity to participate in the future growth potential of a company through an equity component, typically in the form of warrants. Due to its higher risk profile and less restrictive covenants, loans associated with junior subordinated debt financing generally earn a higher return than senior debt or senior subordinated debt instruments.

ONGOING RELATIONSHIPS WITH PORTFOLIO COMPANIES

Monitoring.  We monitor the financial trends of each portfolio company to assess the appropriate course of action for each company and to evaluate overall portfolio quality. We closely monitor the status and performance of each individual company on at least a quarterly and, in most cases, a monthly basis.

We have several methods of evaluating and monitoring the performance of our bilateral and syndicated debt and equity positions, including but not limited to the following:

In addition, we may from time to time identify investments that require closer monitoring or become workout assets. In such cases, we will develop a strategy for workout assets and periodically gauge our progress against that strategy. As a private equity holder, we may incur losses from our investing activities from time to time, however we attempt where possible to work with troubled portfolio companies in order to recover as much of our investments as is practicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Portfolio Grading

We have developed a credit grading system to monitor the quality of our debt investment portfolio. We use an investment rating scale of 1 to 5. The following table provides a description of the conditions associated with each debt investment. Equity securities are not graded.

Grade		Summary Description
1		Company is ahead of expectations and/or outperforming financial covenant requirements of the specified tranche and such trend is expected to continue.
2		Full repayment of the cost basis and interest is expected for the specific tranche.
3		Closer monitoring is required. Full repayment of the outstanding cost basis and interest is expected for the specific tranche.
4		A reduction of interest income has occurred or is expected to occur. Full repayment of the outstanding cost basis and interest is expected for the specific tranche.
5		Full repayment of the outstanding cost basis and interest is not expected for the specific tranche.

Managerial assistance

As a business development company, we are required to offer managerial assistance to portfolio companies. This assistance typically involves monitoring the operations of portfolio companies, participating in their board and management meetings, consulting with and advising their officers and providing other organizational and financial guidance.

Portfolio Overview

We seek to create a portfolio that includes primarily senior secured loans, senior subordinated and junior subordinated debt investments, as well as warrants and other equity instruments we may receive in connection with such debt investments. We generally expect to invest between $5 million and $50 million in each of our portfolio companies. We expect that our investment portfolio will be diversified among a large number of investments with few investments, if any, exceeding 5% of the total portfolio.

The following is a representative list of the industries in which we have invested:

During 2013 we have seen significant price volatility for corporate loans consistent with many other parts of the debt and equity markets. Although corporate loan prices may still be below historical averages, our view is that certain, primarily larger-issuer, broadly syndicated corporate loans still may not adequately reflect the spreads necessary to compensate investors for the risks involved. In view of the above circumstances, we continue to focus more heavily on middle-market issuers and to a limited extent larger issuers, and, opportunistically, on certain structured finance investments, including CLO investment vehicles. During the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, we invested approximately $577.5 million comprised of approximately 68.2% in senior secured notes, 27.6% in CLO equity, 3.6% in CLO debt and 0.6% in common equity. At December 31, 2013, our portfolio was invested approximately 69.2% in senior secured notes, 25.5% in CLO equity, 3.1% in CLO debt, 1.6% in equity and 0.6% in senior unsecured notes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

TEN LARGEST PORTFOLIO INVESTMENTS AS OF DECEMBER 31, 2013

Our ten largest portfolio company investments at December 31, 2013, based on the combined fair value of the debt and equity securities we hold in each portfolio company, were as follows:

						At December 31, 2013
						($ in millions)
Portfolio Company		Industry				Cost				Fair Value				Fair Value Percentage of Total Portfolio
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.			Software			$	29.6			$	29.8				3.2	%
Merrill Communications, LLC.			Printing and publishing				22.8				29.6				3.2	%
Attachmate Corporation			Enterprise software				24.1				24.1				2.6	%
Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, Inc.			Consumer services				23.4				24.0				2.6	%
Cedar Funding II CLO, Ltd.			Structured finance				24.0				23.9				2.6	%
Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd.			Structured finance				25.2				23.0				2.4	%
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc.			Telecommunications services				16.1				19.1				2.0	%
First American Payment Systems			Financial intermediaries				18.3				18.4				2.0	%
First Data Corporation			Financial intermediaries				16.9				16.9				1.8	%
RBS Holding Company.			Printing and publishing				11.1				16.7				1.8	%
						$	211.5			$	225.5				24.2	%

For a description of the factors relevant to the changes in the value of the above portfolio investments for the year ended December 31, 2013, see “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations — Portfolio Grading.”

Set forth below are descriptions of the ten largest portfolio investments as of December 31, 2013:

Help/Systems Holdings, Inc.

Help/Systems Holdings, Inc. (“Help/Systems”) is a leading third-party provider of IT infrastructure software solutions in Systems & Network Management, Business Intelligence and Security & Compliance.

In June 2013, we acquired $15.0 million of the first lien senior secured notes and $15.0 million of the second lien senior secured notes issued by Help/Systems. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $15.0 million remained outstanding on our first lien investment and $15.0 million remained outstanding on our investment in the second lien senior secured notes.

Merrill Corporation

Merrill Corporation (“Merrill”) is a provider of complex information management and business solutions, including document and data management, litigation support, branded communications programs, fulfillment, imaging and printing.

In January 2011, we acquired approximately $6.1 million of second lien senior secured PIK notes issued by Merrill. In March 2013, Merrill completed a restructuring of its debt and our investment, which had an outstanding balance of approximately $6.6 million at the time of the restructuring, was paid down by approximately $1.1 million and the remaining balance of approximately $5.5 million was converted into a senior unsecured PIK note. Also, in conjunction with this restructuring, we received common equity shares issued by Merrill. Furthermore, in March 2013, we also purchased approximately $14.0 million of first lien senior secured notes. In August 2013, we purchased approximately $3.6 million of additional first lien senior secured notes. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $22.2 million remained outstanding on our combined debt investments in Merrill.

Attachmate Corporation

Attachmate Corporation (“Attachmate”) is a provider of infrastructure software that provides host access and host integration, system and security management and PC lifecycle management.

During May 2012, we purchased $8.0 million of the first lien senior secured notes issued by Attachmate and $10.0 million of the second lien senior secured notes. In September 2012 and March 2013, we purchased

TABLE OF CONTENTS

an additional $3.0 million and $5.0 million of the second lien notes, respectively. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $7.0 million remained outstanding on our first lien investment and approximately $17.5 million remained outstanding on our investment in the second lien senior secured notes.

Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, Inc.

Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, Inc. (“Jackson Hewitt”) is a provider of federal and state tax return preparation services through franchised and company-owned retail stores and kiosks located throughout the United States.

In October 2012, we acquired $25.0 million of first lien senior secured notes issued by Jackson Hewitt. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $24.2 million remained outstanding on our investment.

Cedar Funding II CLO, Ltd.

Cedar Funding II CLO, Ltd. (“Cedar”) is a collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) investing primarily in U.S.-based senior secured loans and bonds.

In March 2013, we purchased approximately $18.8 million of an equity tranche of the Cedar CLO. In October 2013, we purchased an additional $10.0 million of the equity tranche. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $28.8 million remained outstanding on our investment.

Catamaran CLO, Ltd.

Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd. (“Catamaran”) is a collateralized loan obligation (“CLO”) vehicle investing primarily in U.S.-based senior secured loans and bonds.

In December 2012, we purchased $22.0 million of an equity tranche of the Catamaran CLO and $6.0 million of the Catamaran Class F CLO notes. As of December 31, 2013, $28.0 million remained outstanding on our combined investment in the Catamaran CLO.

Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc.

Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc. (“Integra”) is a facilities-based competitive communications provider offering voice and data services to small and mid-sized enterprises in the northwest and mid-west states of the US.

In March 2013, we acquired approximately $7.5 million of the first lien senior secured notes and $7.0 million of the second lien senior secured notes issued by Integra. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $7.4 million remained outstanding on our first lien investment and $7.0 million remained outstanding on our investment in the second lien senior secured notes. We hold 775,846 shares of common equity in Integra from a previously held second lien note which was converted in November 2009.

First American Payment Systems

First American Payment Systems (“FAPS”) is a privately held, full-service payment processor serving the small and medium-sized business segment in the United States.

During October 2012, we acquired $4.0 million of the first lien senior secured notes issued by FAPS and $15.0 million of the second lien senior secured notes. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $18.6 million remained outstanding on our combined investment in the first and second lien senior secured notes.

First Data Corp.

First Data Corp. (“First Data”) is a global provider of electronic commerce and payment solutions for merchants, financial institutions, and card issuers.

In September 2012, we acquired $10.0 million of the first lien senior secured notes issued by First Data. In February 2013, we purchased approximately $0.9 million of the first lien tranche B notes and during March 2013, we acquired an additional $6.1 million of the first lien senior secured notes. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $16.9 million remained outstanding on our combined investment in the senior secured and tranche B notes.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

RBS Holding Company

RBS Holding Company (“RBS”) is a direct marketer and manufacturer of direct mail fund-raising solutions for non-profit organizations.

In March 2011, we acquired $5.0 million of the first lien senior secured notes issued by RBS. In February 2013, we acquired approximately $17.8 million additional first lien senior secured notes. Due to an amendment, the first lien senior secured notes were subordinated to second lien senior secured notes. As of December 31, 2013, approximately $22.7 million remained outstanding on our second lien senior secured notes.

INVESTMENT ADVISORY AGREEMENT

Management Services

TICC Management serves as our investment adviser. TICC Management is registered as our investment adviser under the Advisers Act. Subject to the overall supervision of our Board of Directors, TICC Management manages our day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to us. Under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement, TICC Management:

TICC Management’s services under the Investment Advisory Agreement are not exclusive, and it is free to furnish similar services to other entities so long as its services to us are not impaired. TICC Management has agreed that, during the term of its Investment Advisory Agreement with us, it will not serve as investment adviser to any other public or private entity that utilizes a principal investment strategy of providing debt financing to middle-market companies similar to those we target.

Management Fee

We pay TICC Management a fee for its services under the Investment Advisory Agreement consisting of two components — a base management fee and an incentive fee. The cost of both the base management fee payable to TICC Management and any incentive fees earned by TICC Management are ultimately borne by our common stockholders.

The base management fee (the “Base Fee”) is calculated at an annual rate of 2.00% of our gross assets. For services rendered under the Investment Advisory Agreement, the Base Fee is payable quarterly in arrears, and is calculated based on the average value of our gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any equity or debt capital raises, repurchases or redemptions during the current calendar quarter. The Base Fee for any partial quarter will be appropriately pro rated.

The incentive fee has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income (including any other fees, such as commitment, origination, structuring, diligence and consulting fees or other fees that we receive from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the Base Fee, expenses payable under our administration agreement with BDC Partners (the “Administration Agreement”), and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that we have not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized capital gains, realized capital losses or unrealized capital appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of our net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to one-fourth of an annual “hurdle rate.”

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For each year commencing on or after January 1, 2005, the annual hurdle rate has been determined as of the immediately preceding December 31^st by adding 5.0% to the interest rate then payable on the most recently issued five-year U.S. Treasury Notes, up to a maximum annual hurdle rate of 10.0%. The annual hurdle rate for the 2012 calendar year was 5.83% and the annual hurdle rate for the 2013 calendar year was 5.72%. The current hurdle rate for the 2014 calendar year, calculated as of December 31, 2013, is 6.75%. Our net investment income (to the extent not distributed to our shareholders) used to calculate this part of the incentive fee is also included in the amount of our gross assets used to calculate the 2% base management fee. In addition, in the event we recognize PIK loan interest in excess of our available capital, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to pay a portion of the incentive fee. TICC Management, however, is not required to reimburse us for the portion of any fees attributable to accrued deferred loan interest in the event of a default by the obligor. The operation of the incentive fee with respect to our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for each quarter is as follows:

For example, for the quarter ended December 31, 2013, pre-incentive fee net investment income of $18.3 million exceeded the hurdle of $7.6 million (based upon net assets of $528.1 million at September 30, 2013 and the quarterly hurdle rate of 1.43%). The incentive fee rate of 20% resulted in an incentive of $2.2 million for the quarter.

The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals 20% of our “Incentive Fee Capital Gains,” which consist of our realized capital gains for each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation for that calendar year. For accounting purposes only, in order to reflect the theoretical capital gains incentive fee that would be payable for a given period as if all unrealized gains were realized, we will accrue a capital gains incentive fee based upon net realized capital gains and unrealized capital depreciation for that calendar year (in accordance with the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement), plus unrealized capital appreciation on investments held at the end of the period. It should be noted that a fee so calculated and accrued would not necessarily be payable under the Investment Advisory Agreement, and may never be paid based upon the computation of capital gains incentive fees in subsequent periods. Amounts paid under the Investment Advisory Agreement will be consistent with the formula reflected in the Investment Advisory Agreement.

Example 1: Income Related Portion of Incentive Fee for Each Calendar Quarter^(*)

Alternative 1

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 1.25%

Quarterly Hurdle rate⁽¹⁾ = 1.6875%

Management fee⁽²⁾ = 0.5%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income – (management fee + other expenses)) = 0.55%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not exceed the hurdle rate, therefore there is no income-related incentive fee.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Alternative 2

Assumptions

Investment income (including interest, dividends, fees, etc.) = 4.0%

Quarterly Hurdle rate⁽¹⁾ = 1.6875%

Management fee⁽²⁾ = 0.5%

Other expenses (legal, accounting, custodian, transfer agent, etc.) = 0.2%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income

(investment income – (management fee + other expenses)) = 3.3%

Incentive fee		= 20% x Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income in excess of the hurdle rate
		= 20% x (3.3% – 1.6875%)
		= 20% x 1.6125%
		= 0.3225%

Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income exceeds hurdle rate, therefore the income-related incentive fee is 0.3225%

Example 2: Capital Gains Portion of Incentive Fee^(*)

Capital Gains Incentive Fee = 20% x Incentive Fee Capital Gains (i.e., our realized capital gains for each calendar year, computed net of all realized capital losses and unrealized capital depreciation for that calendar year)

Assumptions:

Year 1 = no realized capital gains or losses

Year 2 = 9% realized capital gains, 0% realized capital losses, 1% unrealized depreciation and 0% unrealized appreciation

Year 3 = 12% realized capital gains, 0% realized capital losses, 2% unrealized depreciation and 2% unrealized appreciation

Year 1 incentive fee		• Total Incentive Fee Capital Gains = 0
		• No capital gains incentive fee paid to TICC Management in Year 1
Year 2 incentive fee		• Total Incentive Fee Capital Gains = 8%
		(9% realized capital gains less 1% unrealized depreciation)
		• Total capital gains incentive fee paid to TICC Management in Year 2
		= 20% x 8%
		= 1.6%
Year 3 incentive fee		• Total Incentive Fee Capital Gains = 10%
		(12% realized capital gains less 2% unrealized depreciation; unrealized appreciation has no effect)
		• Total capital gains incentive fee paid to TICC Management in Year 3
		= 20% x 10%
		= 2%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Payment of our Expenses

Our primary operating expenses are the payment of a base management fee and any incentive fees under the Investment Advisory Agreement and the allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement. Our investment management fee compensates TICC Management for its work in identifying, evaluating, negotiating, executing and servicing our investments. We bear all other expenses of our operations and transactions, including (without limitation) fees and expenses relating to:

All of these expenses are ultimately borne by our common stockholders.

All personnel of our investment adviser when and to the extent engaged in providing investment advisory services, and the compensation and expenses of such personnel allocable to such services, will be provided and paid for by BDC Partners, the investment adviser’s managing member.

Duration and Termination

Unless earlier terminated as described below, the Investment Advisory Agreement will remain in effect if approved annually by our Board of Directors or by the affirmative vote of the holders of a majority of our

TABLE OF CONTENTS

outstanding voting securities, including, in either case, approval by a majority of our directors who are not interested persons. The Investment Advisory Agreement will automatically terminate in the event of its assignment. The Investment Advisory Agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the other. See “Risk Factors — Risks relating to our business and structure — We are dependent upon TICC Management’s key management personnel for our future success, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen and Saul B. Rosenthal.”

Indemnification

The Investment Advisory Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of their respective duties and obligations, TICC Management and its officers, managers, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it, including without limitation BDC Partners, are entitled to indemnification from TICC for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of TICC Management’s services under the Investment Advisory Agreement or otherwise as an investment adviser of TICC.

Organization of the Investment Adviser

TICC Management is a Delaware limited liability company that is registered as an investment adviser under the Advisers Act. BDC Partners, a Delaware limited liability company, is its managing member and provides our investment adviser with all personnel necessary to manage our day-to-day operations and provide the services under the Investment Advisory Agreement. The principal address of TICC Management and of BDC Partners is 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, Connecticut 06830.

During 2011, Royce and Associates, a Delaware limited liability company, transferred to Mr. Charles M. Royce its membership interest in TICC Management. Following this transaction, Mr. Royce became a non-managing member of TICC Management.

ADMINISTRATION AGREEMENT

Pursuant to a separate Administration Agreement, BDC Partners furnishes us with office facilities, together with equipment and clerical, bookkeeping and record keeping services at such facilities. Under the Administration Agreement, BDC Partners also performs, or oversees the performance of our required administrative services, which includes being responsible for the financial records which we are required to maintain and preparing reports to our stockholders and reports filed with the SEC. In addition, BDC Partners assists us in determining and publishing our net asset value, overseeing the preparation and filing of our tax returns and the printing and dissemination of reports to our stockholders, and generally overseeing the payment of our expenses and the performance of administrative and professional services rendered to us by others. Payments under the Administration Agreement are based upon our allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Controller and other administrative support personnel. The Administration Agreement may be terminated by either party without penalty upon 60 days’ written notice to the other party.

The Administration Agreement provides that, absent willful misfeasance, bad faith or gross negligence in the performance of their respective duties or by reason of the reckless disregard of their respective duties and obligations, BDC Partners and its officers, manager, agents, employees, controlling persons, members and any other person or entity affiliated with it are entitled to indemnification from TICC for any damages, liabilities, costs and expenses (including reasonable attorneys’ fees and amounts reasonably paid in settlement) arising from the rendering of BDC Partners’ services under the Administration Agreement or otherwise as administrator for TICC.

COMPETITION

Our primary competitors to provide financing to primarily non-public small- and medium-sized companies include private equity and venture capital funds, other equity and non-equity based investment funds, including other business development companies, and investment banks and other sources of financing,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

including traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and specialty finance companies. Many of these entities have greater financial and managerial resources than we will have. For additional information concerning the competitive risks we face, see “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to Our Business and Structure — We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.”

EMPLOYEES

We have no employees. Our day-to-day investment operations are managed by our investment adviser. In addition, we reimburse BDC Partners for an allocable portion of expenses incurred by it in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of our Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer, Controller and other administrative support personnel.

MATERIAL U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAX CONSIDERATIONS

As a business development company, we have elected to be treated, and intend to qualify annually, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code, beginning with our 2003 taxable year. As a RIC, we generally will not have to pay corporate-level U.S. federal income taxes on any ordinary income or capital gains that we distribute to our stockholders as dividends. To continue to qualify as a RIC, we must, among other things, meet certain source-of-income and asset diversification requirements (as described below). In addition, to qualify for RIC tax treatment we must distribute to our stockholders, for each taxable year, at least 90% of our “investment company taxable income,” which is generally our ordinary income plus the excess of our realized net short-term capital gains over our realized net long-term capital losses (the “Annual Distribution Requirement”).

Taxation as a Regulated Investment Company

If we:

then we will not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the portion of our investment company taxable income and net capital gain (i.e., realized net long-term capital gains in excess of realized net short-term capital losses) we distribute to stockholders. We will be subject to U.S. federal income tax at the regular corporate rates on any income or capital gains not distributed (or deemed distributed) to our stockholders.

We will be subject to a 4% nondeductible U.S. federal excise tax on certain undistributed income unless we distribute in a timely manner an amount at least equal to the sum of (1) 98% of our net ordinary income for each calendar year, (2) 98.2% of our capital gain net income for the one-year period ending October 31 in that calendar year and (3) any income realized, but not distributed, and on which we paid no federal income tax, in preceding years (the “Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement”). We generally will endeavor in each taxable year to make sufficient distributions to our stockholders to satisfy the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement.

In order to qualify as a RIC for U.S. federal income tax purposes, we must, among other things:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We may be required to recognize taxable income in circumstances in which we do not receive cash. For example, if we hold debt obligations that are treated under applicable tax rules as having original issue discount (such as debt instruments with PIK interest or, in certain cases, increasing interest rates or issued with warrants), we must include in income each year a portion of the original issue discount that accrues over the life of the obligation, regardless of whether cash representing such income is received by us in the same taxable year. We may also have to include in income other amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as PIK interest and deferred loan origination fees that are paid after origination of the loan or are paid in non-cash compensation such as warrants or stock. Because any original issue discount or other amounts accrued will be included in our investment company taxable income for the year of accrual, we may be required to make a distribution to our stockholders in order to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, even though we will not have received any corresponding cash amount. In addition, we may be required to accrue for federal income tax purposes amounts attributable to our investment in CLOs that may differ from the distributions received in respect of such investments. Although we do not presently expect to do so, we are authorized to borrow funds, to sell assets and to make taxable distributions of our stock and debt securities in order to satisfy distribution requirements. Our ability to dispose of assets to meet our distribution requirements may be limited by (1) the illiquid nature of our portfolio and/or (2) other requirements relating to our status as a RIC, including the Diversification Tests. If we dispose of assets in order to meet the Annual Distribution Requirement or the Excise Tax Avoidance Requirement, we may make such dispositions at times that, from an investment standpoint, are not advantageous. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources to satisfy the Annual Distribution Requirement, we may fail to qualify as a RIC and become subject to tax as an ordinary corporation.

Under the 1940 Act, we are not permitted to make distributions to our stockholders while our debt obligations and other senior securities are outstanding unless certain “asset coverage” tests are met. If we are prohibited to make distributions, we may fail to qualify as a RIC and become subject to tax as an ordinary corporation.

We have purchased and may in the future purchase residual or subordinated interests in CLOs that are treated for federal income tax purposes as shares in a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”). We may be subject to federal income tax on our allocable share of a portion of any “excess distribution” received on, or any gain from the disposition of, such shares even if our allocable share of such income is distributed as a taxable dividend to the PFIC’s stockholders. Additional charges, in the nature of interest, generally will be imposed on us in respect of deferred taxes arising from any such excess distribution or gain. If we elect to treat a PFIC as a “qualified electing fund” under the Code (a “QEF”), in lieu of the foregoing requirements, we will be required to include in income each year our proportionate share of the ordinary earnings and net capital gain of the QEF, even if such income is not distributed by the QEF. Alternatively, we may be able to elect to mark-to-market at the end of each taxable year our shares in a PFIC; in this case, we will recognize as ordinary income our allocable share of any increase in the value of such shares, and as ordinary loss our allocable share of any decrease in such value to the extent that any such decrease does not exceed prior increases included in our income. Under either election, we may be required to recognize in a year income in excess of distributions from PFICs and proceeds from dispositions of PFIC shares during that year, and such income will nevertheless be subject to the Annual Distribution Requirement and will be taken into account for purposes of the 4% excise tax.

Under certain circumstances, a CLO may be treated as a controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If a CLO is treated as a CFC, and we are considered to own 10% or more of total voting power in such CLO, we would be required to include in income each year any “subpart F income” generated by such CLO, which would generally include its net investment income, regardless of whether we received any distributions with respect to such income.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Although the Code generally provides that income inclusions from a QEF and subpart F income will be “good income” for purposes of the 90% Income Test to the extent it is distributed to a RIC in the year it is included in the RIC’s income, the Code does not specifically provide whether income inclusions from a QEF and subpart F income for which no distribution is received during the RIC’s taxable year would be “good income” for the 90% Income Test. The IRS has issued a series of private rulings in which it has concluded that all income inclusions from a QEF and subpart F income included in a RIC’s income would constitute “good income” for purposes of the 90% Income Test. Such rulings are not binding on the IRS except with respect to the taxpayer to whom such rulings were issued. Accordingly, although we believe that the income inclusions from a QEF and subpart F income of a CLO that we are required to include in our taxable income would be “good income” for purposes of the 90% Income Test, no guaranty can be made that the IRS would not assert that such income would not be “good income” for purposes of the 90% Income Test. If such income were not considered “good income” for purposes of the 90% Income Test, we may fail to qualify as a RIC.

Failure to Qualify as a Regulated Investment Company

If we were unable to qualify for treatment as a RIC, we would be subject to tax on all of our taxable income at regular corporate rates, regardless of whether we make any distributions to our stockholders. Distributions would not be required, and any distributions made would be taxable to our stockholders as ordinary dividend income that, subject to certain limitations, may be eligible for the 20.0% maximum rate to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits. Subject to certain limitations under the Code, corporate distributees would be eligible for the dividends-received deduction. Distributions in excess of our current and accumulated earnings and profits would be treated first as a return of capital to the extent of the stockholder’s tax basis, and any remaining distributions would be treated as a capital gain.

REGULATION AS A BUSINESS DEVELOPMENT COMPANY

General

A business development company is regulated by the 1940 Act. A business development company must be organized in the United States for the purpose of investing in or lending to primarily private companies and making managerial assistance available to them. A business development company may use capital provided by public stockholders and from other sources to invest in long -term, private investments in businesses. A business development company provides stockholders the ability to retain the liquidity of a publicly traded stock, while sharing in the possible benefits, if any, of investing in primarily privately owned companies.

We may not change the nature of our business so as to cease to be, or withdraw our election as, a business development company unless authorized by vote of a majority of the outstanding voting securities, as required by the 1940 Act. A majority of the outstanding voting securities of a company is defined under the 1940 Act as the lesser of: (i) 67% or more of such company’s voting securities present at a meeting if more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company are present or represented by proxy, or (ii) more than 50% of the outstanding voting securities of such company. We do not anticipate any substantial change in the nature of our business.

As with other companies regulated by the 1940 Act, a business development company must adhere to certain substantive regulatory requirements. A majority of our directors must be persons who are not interested persons, as that term is defined in the 1940 Act. Additionally, we are required to provide and maintain a bond issued by a reputable fidelity insurance company to protect the business development company. Furthermore, as a business development company, we are prohibited from protecting any director or officer against any liability to the company or our stockholders arising from willful misfeasance, bad faith, gross negligence or reckless disregard of the duties involved in the conduct of such person’s office.

As a business development company, we are required to meet a coverage ratio of the value of total assets to total senior securities, which include all of our borrowings and any preferred stock we may issue in the future, of at least 200%. We may also be prohibited under the 1940 Act from knowingly participating in certain transactions with our affiliates without the prior approval of our directors who are not interested persons and, in some cases, prior approval by the SEC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We are not generally able to sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to our Business and Structure — Regulations governing our operation as a business development company affect our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital which may expose us to risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage.” We may, however, sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share (i) in connection with a rights offering to our existing stockholders, (ii) with the consent of the majority of our common stockholders, or (iii) under such other circumstances as the SEC may permit. For example, we may sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then current net asset value of our common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in our best interests and the best interests of our stockholders, and our stockholders approve our policy and practice of making such sales. In any such case, under such circumstances, the price at which our common stock to be issued and sold may not be less than a price which, in the determination of our Board of Directors, closely approximates the market value of such common stock. In addition, we may generally issue new shares of our common stock at a price below net asset value in rights offerings to existing stockholders, in payment of dividends and in certain other limited circumstances.

We may be examined by the SEC for compliance with the 1940 Act.

As a business development company, we are subject to certain risks and uncertainties. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to our Business and Structure.”

Qualifying Assets

As a business development company, we may not acquire any asset other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time we make the acquisition, the value of our qualifying assets represent at least 70% of the value of our total assets. The principal categories of qualifying assets relevant to our business are:

An eligible portfolio company is generally a domestic company that is not an investment company (other than a small business investment company wholly owned by a business development company) and that:

Control, as defined by the 1940 Act, is presumed to exist where a business development company beneficially owns more than 25% of the outstanding voting securities of the portfolio company.

In addition, a business development company must have been organized and have its principal place of business in the United States and must be operated for the purpose of making investments in eligible portfolio companies, or in other securities that are consistent with its purpose as a business development company.

Significant Managerial Assistance

To include certain securities described above as qualifying assets for the purpose of the 70% test, a business development company must offer to the issuer of those securities managerial assistance such as

TABLE OF CONTENTS

providing guidance and counsel concerning the management, operations, or business objectives and policies of a portfolio company. We offer to provide managerial assistance to our portfolio companies.

Code of Ethics

As required by the 1940 Act, we maintain a Code of Ethics that establishes procedures for personal investments and restricts certain transactions by our personnel. See “Risk Factors — Risks Relating to our Business and Structure — There are significant potential conflicts of interest.” Our Code of Ethics generally does not permit investments by our employees in securities that may be purchased or held by us. You may read and copy the Code of Ethics at the SEC’s Public Reference Room in Washington, D.C. You may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the SEC at 1-800-SEC-0330. In addition, the Code of Ethics is available on the EDGAR Database on the SEC’s Internet site at http://www.sec.gov. You may obtain copies of the Code of Ethics, after paying a duplicating fee, by electronic request at the following Email address: publicinfo@sec.gov, or by writing the SEC’s Public Reference Section, 100 F Street, N.E., Washington, D.C. 20549. Our code of ethics is also available on our website at http://www.ticc.com.

Compliance Policies and Procedures

We and our investment adviser have adopted and implemented written policies and procedures reasonably designed to prevent violation of the federal securities laws, and are required to review these compliance policies and procedures annually for their adequacy and the effectiveness of their implementation, and designate a Chief Compliance Officer to be responsible for administering the policies and procedures.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 imposes a wide variety of new regulatory requirements on publicly-held companies and their insiders. Many of these requirements affect us. For example:

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires us to review our current policies and procedures to determine whether we comply with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and the regulations promulgated thereunder. We will continue to monitor our compliance with all regulations that are adopted under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.

Fundamental Investment Policies

The restrictions identified as fundamental below, along with our investment objective of seeking to maximize total return, are our only fundamental policies. Fundamental policies may not be changed without the approval of the holders of a majority of our outstanding voting securities, as defined in the 1940 Act. The percentage restrictions set forth below, apply at the time a transaction is effected, and a subsequent change in a percentage resulting from market fluctuations or any cause will not require us to dispose of portfolio securities or to take other action to satisfy the percentage restriction.

As a matter of fundamental policy, we will not: (1) act as an underwriter of securities of other issuers (except to the extent that we may be deemed an “underwriter” of securities we purchase that must be registered under the 1933 Act before they may be offered or sold to the public); (2) purchase or sell real estate or interests in real estate or real estate investment trusts (except that we may (A) purchase and sell real estate

TABLE OF CONTENTS

or interests in real estate in connection with the orderly liquidation of investments, or in connection with foreclosure on collateral, (B) own the securities of companies that are in the business of buying, selling or developing real estate or (C) finance the purchase of real estate by our portfolio companies); (3) sell securities short (except with regard to managing the risks associated with publicly-traded securities issued by our portfolio companies); (4) purchase securities on margin (except to the extent that we may purchase securities with borrowed money); or (5) engage in the purchase or sale of commodities or commodity contracts, including futures contracts (except where necessary in working out distressed loan or investment situations or in hedging the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations), and, in such cases, only after all necessary registrations (or exemptions from registration) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have been obtained.

We may invest up to 100% of our assets in securities acquired directly from issuers in privately negotiated transactions. With respect to such securities, we may, for the purpose of public resale, be deemed an “underwriter” as that term is defined in the 1933 Act. Our intention is to not write (sell) or buy put or call options to manage risks associated with the publicly-traded securities of our portfolio companies, except that we may enter into hedging transactions to manage the risks associated with interest rate fluctuations, and, in such cases, only after all necessary registrations (or exemptions from registration) with the Commodity Futures Trading Commission have been obtained. However, we may purchase or otherwise receive warrants to purchase the common stock or other equity securities of our portfolio companies in connection with acquisition financing or other investment. Similarly, in connection with an acquisition, we may acquire rights to require the issuers of acquired securities or their affiliates to repurchase them under certain circumstances. We also do not intend to acquire securities issued by any investment company that exceed the limits imposed by the 1940 Act. Under these limits, unless otherwise permitted by the 1940 Act, we currently cannot acquire more than 3% of the voting securities of any registered investment company, invest more than 5% of the value of our total assets in the securities of one investment company or invest, in the aggregate, in excess of 10% of the value of our total assets in the securities of one or more investment companies. With regard to that portion of our portfolio invested in securities issued by investment companies, it should be noted that such investments might subject our stockholders to additional expenses.

Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures

We have delegated our proxy voting responsibility to our investment adviser, TICC Management. The Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures of TICC Management are set forth below. The guidelines are reviewed periodically by TICC Management and our non-interested directors, and, accordingly, are subject to change. For purposes of these Proxy Voting Policies and Procedures described below, “we” “our” and “us” refers to TICC Management.

Introduction

As an investment adviser registered under the Advisers Act, we have a fiduciary duty to act solely in the best interests of our clients. As part of this duty, we recognize that we must vote client securities in a timely manner free of conflicts of interest and in the best interests of our clients.

These policies and procedures for voting proxies for our investment advisory clients are intended to comply with Section 206 of, and Rule 206(4)-6 under, the Advisers Act.

Proxy Policies

We vote proxies relating to our portfolio securities in the best interests of our clients’ shareholders. We review on a case-by-case basis each proposal submitted to a shareholder vote to determine its impact on the portfolio securities held by our clients. Although we generally vote against proposals that may have a negative impact on our clients’ portfolio securities, we may vote for such a proposal if there exist compelling long-term reasons to do so.

Our proxy voting decisions are made by the senior officers who are responsible for monitoring each of our clients’ investments. To ensure that our vote is not the product of a conflict of interest, we require that: (i) anyone involved in the decision making process disclose to our Chief Compliance Officer any potential conflict that he or she is aware of and any contact that he or she has had with any interested party regarding a

TABLE OF CONTENTS

proxy vote; and (ii) employees involved in the decision making process or vote administration are prohibited from revealing how we intend to vote on a proposal in order to reduce any attempted influence from interested parties.

Proxy Voting Records

You may obtain information about how we voted proxies by making a written request for proxy voting information to: Chief Compliance Officer, TICC Management, LLC, 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, CT 06830.

Periodic Reporting and Audited Financial Statements

We have registered our common stock under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and have reporting obligations thereunder, including the requirement that we file annual and quarterly reports with the SEC. In accordance with the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this annual report contains consolidated financial statements audited and reported on by our independent registered public accounting firm. You may obtain our annual reports on Form 10-K, our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, and our current reports on Form 8-K on our website at http://www.ticc.com free of charge as soon as reasonably practicable after we file such reports electronically with the SEC.

NASDAQ Global Select Market Requirements

We have adopted certain policies and procedures intended to comply with the NASDAQ Global Select Market’s corporate governance rules. We will continue to monitor our compliance with all future listing standards that are approved by the SEC and will take actions necessary to ensure that we are in compliance therewith.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1A. Risk Factors

An investment in our securities involves certain risks relating to our structure and investment objectives. The risks set forth below are not the only risks we face, and we face other risks which we have not yet identified, which we do not currently deem material or which are not yet predictable. If any of the following risks occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could be materially adversely affected. In such case, our net asset value and the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment.

RISKS RELATING TO OUR BUSINESS AND STRUCTURE

Any failure on our part to maintain our status as a business development company would reduce our operating flexibility.

If we do not remain a BDC, we might be regulated as a closed-end investment company under the 1940 Act, which would subject us to substantially more regulatory restrictions under the 1940 Act and correspondingly decrease our operating flexibility.

We are dependent upon TICC Management’s key management personnel for our future success, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen and Saul B. Rosenthal.

We depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the senior management of TICC Management. The senior management, together with other investment professionals, will evaluate, negotiate, structure, close, monitor and service our investments. Our future success will depend to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of the senior management team, particularly Jonathan H. Cohen, the Chief Executive Officer of TICC Management, and Saul B. Rosenthal, the President and Chief Operating Officer of TICC Management. Neither Mr. Cohen nor Mr. Rosenthal will devote all of their business time to our operations, and both will have other demands on their time as a result of their other activities. Neither Mr. Cohen nor Mr. Rosenthal is subject to an employment contract. The departure of either of these individuals could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.

Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to manage our existing portfolio and future growth effectively.

Our ability to achieve our investment objective will depend on our ability to manage our existing investment portfolio and to grow, which will depend, in turn, on our investment adviser’s ability to identify, analyze, invest in and finance companies that meet our investment criteria, and our ability to raise and retain debt and equity capital. Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of our investment adviser’s structuring of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and our access to financing on acceptable terms.

We and TICC Management, through its managing member, BDC Partners, will need to continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. Failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

We operate in a highly competitive market for investment opportunities.

A large number of entities compete with us to make the types of investments that we make. We compete with a large number of hedge funds and CLO investment vehicles, other equity and non-equity based investment funds, including other business development companies, investment banks and other sources of financing, including traditional financial services companies such as commercial banks and specialty finance companies. Many of our competitors are substantially larger than us and have considerably greater financial, technical and marketing resources than we do. For example, some competitors may have a lower cost of funds and access to funding sources that are not available to us. In addition, some of our competitors may have higher risk tolerances or different risk assessments, which could allow them to consider a wider variety of investments and establish more relationships than us. Furthermore, many of our competitors are not subject to the regulatory restrictions that the 1940 Act imposes on us as a business development company. There can be no assurance that the competitive pressures we face will not have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, as a result of this competition, we may not be able to take advantage of attractive investment opportunities from time to time, and we can offer no assurance that we will be able to identify and make investments that are consistent with our investment objective.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Our business model depends upon the development and maintenance of strong referral relationships with private equity and venture capital funds and investment banking firms.

If we fail to maintain our relationships with key firms, or if we fail to establish strong referral relationships with other firms or other sources of investment opportunities, we will not be able to grow our portfolio of loans and achieve our investment objective. In addition, persons with whom we have informal relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and therefore there is no assurance that such relationships will lead to the origination of debt or other investments.

We may not realize gains from our equity investments.

When we invest in debt securities, we may acquire warrants or other equity securities as well. However, the equity interests we receive may not appreciate in value and, in fact, may decline in value. Accordingly, we may not be able to realize gains from our equity interests, and any gains that we do realize on the disposition of any equity interests may not be sufficient to offset any other losses we experience.

Because our investments are generally not in publicly traded securities, there is uncertainty regarding the fair value of our investments, which could adversely affect the determination of our net asset value.

Our portfolio investments are generally not in publicly traded securities. As a result, the fair value of these securities is not readily determinable. We value these securities at fair value as determined in good faith by our Board of Directors based upon the recommendation of the Board’s Valuation Committee. In connection with that determination, members of TICC Management’s portfolio management team prepare portfolio company valuations using the most recent portfolio company financial statements and forecasts. We utilize the services of a third party valuation firm which prepares valuations for each of our bilateral portfolio securities that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company (i) have a value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of our total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, the frequency of the third party valuations of our bilateral portfolio securities is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under our credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly.

TICC Management also retains the authority to seek, on our behalf, additional third party valuations with respect to both our bilateral portfolio securities and our syndicated loan investments. In accordance with ASC 820-10-35, our valuation procedures specifically provide for the review of indicative quotes supplied by the large agent banks that make a market for each security. However, the marketplace from which we obtain indicative bid quotes for purposes of determining the fair value of our syndicated loan investments have shown these attributes of illiquidity as described by ASC-820-10-35. Due to limited market liquidity in the syndicated loan market, TICC believes that the non-binding indicative bids received from agent banks for certain syndicated investments that we own may not be determinative of their fair value and therefore alternative valuation procedures may need to be undertaken. As a result, TICC has engaged third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing certain syndicated investments that we own. In addition, TICC Management prepares an analysis of each syndicated loan, including a financial summary, covenant compliance review, recent trading activity in the security, if known, and other business developments related to the portfolio company. All available information, including non-binding indicative bids which may not be determinative of fair value, is presented to the Valuation Committee to consider in its determination of fair value. In some instances, there may be limited trading activity in a security even though the market for the security is considered not active. In such cases the Valuation Committee will consider the number of trades, the size and timing of each trade, and other circumstances around such trades, to the extent such information is available, in its determination of fair value. The Valuation Committee will evaluate the impact of such additional information, and factor it into its consideration of the fair value that is indicated by the analysis provided by third-party valuation firms. We have considered the factors described in ASC 820-10 and have determined that we are properly valuing the securities in our portfolio.

Our Board of Directors retains ultimate authority as to the third-party review cycle as well as the appropriate valuation of each investment. The types of factors that the Valuation Committee takes into account in providing its fair value recommendation to our Board of Directors includes, as relevant, the nature and

TABLE OF CONTENTS

value of any collateral, the portfolio company’s ability to make payments and its earnings, the markets in which the portfolio company does business, comparison to valuations of publicly traded companies, comparisons to recent sales of comparable companies, the discounted value of the cash flows of the portfolio company and other relevant factors. Because such valuations are inherently uncertain and may be based on estimates, our determinations of fair value may differ materially from the values that would be assessed if a readily available market for these securities existed.

The lack of liquidity in our investments may adversely affect our business.

As stated above, our investments are generally not in publicly traded securities. Substantially all of these securities are subject to legal and other restrictions on resale or will otherwise be less liquid than publicly traded securities. The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if the need arises. Also, if we are required to liquidate all or a portion of our portfolio quickly, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have previously recorded our investments.

In addition, because we generally invest in debt securities with a term of up to seven years and generally intend to hold such investments until maturity of the debt, we do not expect realization events, if any, to occur in the near-term. We expect that our holdings of equity securities may require several years to appreciate in value, and we can offer no assurance that such appreciation will occur.

We may experience fluctuations in our operating results for any period, and as a result, our financial results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

We may experience fluctuations in our operating results due to a number of factors, including the rate at which we make new investments, the interest rates payable on the debt securities we acquire, the default rate on such securities, the level of our expenses, variations in and the timing of the recognition of realized and unrealized gains or losses, the degree to which we encounter competition in our markets and general economic conditions. As a result of these factors, results for any period should not be relied upon as being indicative of performance in future periods.

Capital markets have, over the past five years, been in a period of disruption and instability. These market conditions have materially and adversely affected debt and equity capital markets in the U.S. and abroad, which had, and may in the future have, a negative impact on our business and operations.

The global capital markets have, over the past five years, been in a period of disruption as evidenced by a lack of liquidity in the debt capital markets, significant write-offs in the financial services sector, the re-pricing of credit risk in the broadly syndicated credit market and the failure of certain major financial institutions. Despite actions of the U.S. federal government and foreign governments, these events contributed to worsening general economic conditions that materially and adversely impacted the broader financial and credit markets and reduced the availability of debt and equity capital for the market as a whole and financial services firms in particular. These conditions could return in the future. Should these conditions return, we and other companies in the financial services sector may have to access, if available, alternative markets for debt and equity capital. Equity capital may be difficult to raise because, subject to some limited exceptions which apply to us, as a BDC we are generally not able to issue additional shares of our common stock at a price less than net asset value. In addition, our ability to incur indebtedness (including by issuing preferred stock) is limited by applicable regulations such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, must equal at least 200% immediately after each time we incur indebtedness. The debt capital that will be available, if at all, may be at a higher cost and on less favorable terms and conditions in the future. Any inability to raise capital could have a negative effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

The illiquidity of our investments may make it difficult for us to sell such investments if required. As a result, we may realize significantly less than the value at which we have recorded our investments. In addition, significant changes in the capital markets, including the recent period of extreme volatility and disruption, have had, and may in the future have, a negative effect on the valuations of our investments and on the potential for liquidity events involving our investments. An inability to raise capital, and any required sale of our investments for liquidity purposes, could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

If we cannot obtain additional capital because of either regulatory or market price constraints, we could be forced to curtail or cease our new lending and investment activities, our net asset value could decrease and our level of distributions and liquidity could be affected adversely.

Our ability to secure additional financing and satisfy our financial obligations under indebtedness outstanding from time to time will depend upon our future operating performance, which is subject to the prevailing general economic and credit market conditions, including interest rate levels and the availability of credit generally, and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond our control. The prolonged continuation or worsening of current economic and capital market conditions could have a material adverse effect on our ability to secure financing on favorable terms, if at all.

If we are unable to obtain debt capital, then our equity investors will not benefit from the potential for increased returns on equity resulting from leverage to the extent that our investment strategy is successful and we may be limited in our ability to make new commitments or fundings to our portfolio companies.

Uncertainty about the financial stability of the United States and of several countries in the European Union (EU) could have a significant adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Due to federal budget deficit concerns, S&P downgraded the federal government’s credit rating from AAA to AA+ for the first time in history on August 5, 2011. Further, Moody’s and Fitch have warned that they may downgrade the federal government’s credit rating. Further downgrades or warnings by S&P or other rating agencies, and the government’s credit and deficit concerns in general, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact both the perception of credit risk associated with our debt portfolio and our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms. In addition, a decreased credit rating could create broader financial turmoil and uncertainty, which may weigh heavily on our financial performance and the value of our common stock.

In 2010, a financial crisis emerged in Europe, triggered by high budget deficits and rising direct and contingent sovereign debt in Greece, Ireland, Italy, Portugal and Spain, which created concerns about the ability of these nations to continue to service their sovereign debt obligations. Risks and ongoing concerns resulting from the debt crisis in Europe could have a detrimental impact on the global economic recovery, sovereign and non-sovereign debt in these countries and the financial condition of European financial institutions. Market and economic disruptions have affected, and may continue to affect, consumer confidence levels and spending, personal bankruptcy rates, levels of incurrence and default on consumer debt and home prices, among other factors. We cannot assure you that the market disruptions in Europe, including the increased cost of funding for certain governments and financial institutions, will not spread, and we cannot assure you that future assistance packages will be available, or if available, sufficient to stabilize the affected countries and markets in Europe or elsewhere. To the extent uncertainty regarding any economic recovery in Europe continues to negatively impact consumer confidence and consumer credit factors, our business and results of operations could be significantly and adversely affected.

On December 18, 2013, the U.S. Federal Reserve announced that it would scale back its bond-buying program, or quantitative easing, which is designed to stimulate the economy and expand the Federal Reserve’s holdings of long-term securities until key economic indicators, such as the unemployment rate, show signs of improvement. The Federal Reserve signaled it would reduce its purchases of long-term Treasury bonds and would scale back on its purchases of mortgage-backed securities. It is unclear what effect, if any, the incremental reduction in the rate of the Federal Reserve’s monthly purchases will have on the value of our investments. However, it is possible that absent continued quantitative easing by the Federal Reserve, these developments, along with the European sovereign debt crisis, could cause interest rates and borrowing costs to rise, which may negatively impact our ability to access the debt markets on favorable terms.

A failure or the perceived risk of a failure to raise the statutory debt limit of the United States could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

As has been widely reported, the United States Treasury Secretary has stated that the federal government may not be able to meet its debt payments in the relatively near future unless the federal debt ceiling is raised. If legislation increasing the debt ceiling is not enacted and the debt ceiling is reached, the federal

TABLE OF CONTENTS

government may stop or delay making payments on its obligations. A failure by Congress to raise the debt limit would increase the risk of default by the United States on its obligations, as well as the risk of other economic dislocations.

If the U.S. government fails to complete its budget process or to provide for a continuing resolution before the expiration of the current continuing resolution, another federal government shutdown may result. Such a failure or the perceived risk of such a failure, consequently, could have a material adverse effect on the financial markets and economic conditions in the United States and throughout the world. It could also limit our ability and the ability of our portfolio companies to obtain financing, and it could have a material adverse effect on the valuation of our portfolio companies. Consequently, the continued uncertainty in the general economic environment, including the recent government shutdown and potential debt ceiling implications, as well in specific economies of several individual geographic markets in which our portfolio companies operate, could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Uncertainty relating to the LIBOR calculation process may adversely affect the value of our portfolio of the LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities.

Concerns have been publicized that some of the member banks surveyed by the British Bankers’ Association (“BBA”) in connection with the calculation of LIBOR across a range of maturities and currencies may have been under-reporting or otherwise manipulating the inter-bank lending rate applicable to them in order to profit on their derivatives positions or to avoid an appearance of capital insufficiency or adverse reputational or other consequences that may have resulted from reporting inter-bank lending rates higher than those they actually submitted. A number of BBA member banks have entered into settlements with their regulators and law enforcement agencies with respect to alleged manipulation of LIBOR, and investigations by regulators and governmental authorities in various jurisdictions are ongoing.

Actions by the BBA, regulators or law enforcement agencies may result in changes to the manner in which LIBOR is determined. Uncertainty as to the nature of such potential changes may adversely affect the market for LIBOR-based securities, including our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities. In addition, any further changes or reforms to the determination or supervision of LIBOR may result in a sudden or prolonged increase or decrease in reported LIBOR, which could have an adverse impact on the market for LIBOR-based securities or the value of our portfolio of LIBOR-indexed, floating-rate debt securities.

Economic recessions or downturns could impair our portfolio companies and harm our operating results.

Many of our portfolio companies may be susceptible to economic slowdowns or recessions and may be unable to repay our loans during these periods. Therefore, our non-performing assets may increase and the value of our portfolio may decrease during these periods as we are required to record the values of our investments. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of collateral securing some of our loans and the value of our equity investments at fair value. Economic slowdowns or recessions could lead to financial losses in our portfolio and a decrease in revenues, net income and assets. Unfavorable economic conditions also could increase our funding costs, limit our access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to us. These events could prevent us from increasing investments and harm our operating results.

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, acceleration of the time when the loans are due and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize the portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt that we hold. We may incur additional expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if one of our portfolio companies were to go bankrupt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant managerial assistance to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors. These events could harm our financial condition and operating results.

Our portfolio companies may face intense competition, including competition from companies with greater financial resources, more extensive research and development, manufacturing, marketing and service capabilities and greater number of qualified and experienced managerial and technical personnel. They may

TABLE OF CONTENTS

need additional financing which they are unable to secure and which we are unable or unwilling to provide, or they may be subject to adverse developments unrelated to the technologies they acquire.

The business, financial condition and results of operations of our portfolio companies could be adversely affected by worldwide economic conditions, as well as political and economic conditions in the countries in which they conduct business.

The business and operating results of our portfolio companies may be impacted by worldwide economic conditions. Although the U.S. economy has in recent quarters shown signs of recovery from the 2008 – 2009 global recession, the strength and duration of any economic recovery will be impacted by worldwide economic growth. For instance, a number of recent reports indicate that growth in China and other emerging markets may be slowing relative to historical growth rates. The significant debt in U.S. and European countries is expected to hinder growth in those countries for the foreseeable future. Multiple factors relating to the international operations of some of our portfolio companies and to particular countries in which they operate could negatively impact their business, financial condition and results of operations.

Some of the products of our portfolio companies are developed, manufactured, assembled, tested or marketed outside the U.S. Any conflict or uncertainty in these countries, including due to natural disasters, public health concerns, political unrest or safety concerns, could harm their business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, if the government of any country in which their products are developed, manufactured or sold sets technical or regulatory standards for products developed or manufactured in or imported into their country that are not widely shared, it may lead some of their customers to suspend imports of their products into that country, require manufacturers or developers in that country to manufacture or develop products with different technical or regulatory standards and disrupt cross-border manufacturing, marketing or business relationships which, in each case, could harm their businesses.

The effect of global climate change may impact the operations of our portfolio companies.

There may be evidence of global climate change. Climate change creates physical and financial risk and some of our portfolio companies may be adversely affected by climate change. For example, the needs of customers of energy companies vary with weather conditions, primarily temperature and humidity. To the extent weather conditions are affected by climate change, energy use could increase or decrease depending on the duration and magnitude of any changes. Increases in the cost of energy could adversely affect the cost of operations of our portfolio companies if the use of energy products or services is material to their business. A decrease in energy use due to weather changes may affect some of our portfolio companies’ financial condition, through decreased revenues. Extreme weather conditions in general require more system backup, adding to costs, and can contribute to increased system stresses, including service interruptions.

The impact of recent financial reform legislation on us is uncertain.

In light of recent conditions in the U.S. and global financial markets and the U.S. and global economy, legislators, the presidential administration and regulators have increased their focus on the regulation of the financial services industry. The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Reform Act”) became effective on July 21, 2010, although many provisions of the Dodd-Frank Reform Act have delayed effectiveness or will not become effective until the relevant federal agencies issue new rules to implement the Dodd-Frank Reform Act. Nevertheless, the Dodd-Frank Reform Act may have a material adverse impact on the financial services industry as a whole and on our business, results of operations and financial condition. Accordingly, we cannot predict the effect the Dodd-Frank Act or its implementing regulations will have on our business, results of operations or financial condition.

Our business is subject to increasingly complex corporate governance, public disclosure and accounting requirements that could adversely affect our business and financial results.

We are subject to changing rules and regulations of federal and state government as well as the stock exchange on which our common stock is listed. These entities, including the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board, the SEC and the NASDAQ Stock Market, have issued a significant number of new and increasingly complex requirements and regulations over the course of the last several years and continue to develop additional regulations and requirements in response to laws enacted by Congress. On July 21, 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, was enacted. There are

TABLE OF CONTENTS

significant corporate governance-related provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act, and the SEC has adopted additional rules and regulations that may impact us. Our efforts to comply with these requirements have resulted in, and are likely to continue to result in, an increase in expenses and a diversion of management’s time from other business activities.

A disruption in the capital markets and the credit markets could negatively affect our business.

As a BDC, we seek to maintain our ability to raise additional capital for investment purposes. Without sufficient access to the capital markets or credit markets, we may not be able to pursue new business opportunities. Disruptive conditions in the financial industry and the impact of new legislation in response to those conditions could restrict our business operations and could adversely impact our results of operations and financial condition.

Our ability to grow our business could be impaired by an inability to access the capital markets or to enter into new credit facilities. At various times over the past three years, reflecting concern about the stability of the financial markets, many lenders and institutional investors have reduced or ceased providing funding to borrowers. This market disruption and tightening of credit has led to increased market volatility and widespread reduction of business activity generally. If we are unable to raise additional equity capital or consummate new credit facilities on terms that are acceptable to us, we may not be able to initiate significant originations.

These situations may arise due to circumstances that we may be unable to control, such as access to the credit markets, a severe decline in the value of the U.S. dollar, a further economic downturn or an operational problem that affects third parties or us, and could materially harm our business. Even though if such conditions have improved broadly and significantly over the short-term, adverse conditions in particular sectors of the financial markets could adversely impact our business over the long-term.

Price declines and illiquidity in the corporate debt markets have adversely affected, and may continue to adversely affect, the fair value of our portfolio investments, reducing our net asset value through increased net unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized depreciation that we experience on our loan portfolio may be an indication of future realized losses, which could reduce our income available for distribution and could adversely affect our ability to service our outstanding borrowings.

As a BDC, we are required to carry our investments at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of our Board of Directors. Decreases in fair values of our investments are recorded as unrealized depreciation. Any unrealized depreciation in our loan portfolio could be an indication of a portfolio company’s inability to meet its repayment obligations to us with respect to the affected loans. This could result in realized losses in the future and ultimately in reductions of our income available for distribution in future periods and could materially adversely affect our ability to service our outstanding borrowings. The unprecedented declines in prices and liquidity in the corporate debt markets from 2008 through mid-2010 resulted in significant net unrealized depreciation in our portfolio, reducing our net asset value. Depending on market conditions, we may incur substantial losses in future periods, which could have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition and results of operations.

Even in the event the value of your investment declines, the management fee and, in certain circumstances, the incentive fee will still be payable.

The management fee is calculated as 2.0% of the value of our gross assets at a specific time. Accordingly, the management fee will be payable regardless of whether the value of our gross assets and/or your investment have decreased. Moreover, a portion of the incentive fee is payable if our net investment income for a calendar quarter exceeds a designated hurdle rate. This portion of the incentive fee is payable without regard to any capital gain, capital loss or unrealized depreciation that may occur during the quarter. Accordingly, this portion of our adviser’s incentive fee may also be payable notwithstanding a decline in net asset value that quarter. In addition, in the event we recognize deferred loan interest income in excess of our available capital as a result of our receipt of payment-in-kind, or “PIK” interest, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to pay a portion of the incentive fee. TICC Management, however, is not required to reimburse us for the portion of any incentive fees attributable to deferred loan interest income in the event of a subsequent default.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PIK interest payments we receive will increase our assets under management and, as a result, will increase the amount of base management fees and incentive fees payable by us to our investment adviser.

Certain of our debt investments contain provisions providing for the payment of contractual PIK interest. Because PIK interest results in an increase in the size of the loan balance of the underlying loan, the receipt by us of PIK interest will have the effect of increasing our assets under management. As a result, because the base management fee that we pay to our investment adviser is based on the value of our gross assets, the receipt by us of PIK interest will result in an increase in the amount of the base management fee payable by us. In addition, any such increase in a loan balance due to the receipt of PIK interest will cause such loan to accrue interest on the higher loan balance, which will result in an increase in our pre-incentive fee net investment income and, as a result, an increase in incentive fees that are payable by us to our investment adviser.

Our investment adviser is not obligated to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee it receives that is based on accrued income that we never receive.

Part of the incentive fee payable by us to our investment adviser that relates to our net investment income is computed and paid on income that may include interest that has been accrued but not yet received in cash, such as market discount, debt instruments with PIK interest, preferred stock with PIK dividends and zero coupon securities. If a portfolio company defaults on a loan that is structured to provide accrued interest, it is possible that accrued interest previously used in the calculation of the incentive fee will become uncollectible. Our investment adviser will not be under any obligation to reimburse us for any part of the incentive fee it received that was based on accrued income that we never receive as a result of a default by an entity on the obligation that resulted in the accrual of such income.

We are permitted to borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us.

On August 10, 2011, we completed a $225.0 million debt securitization financing transaction. The Class A Notes and the subordinated notes offered in the debt securitization were issued by TICC CLO LLC (“2011 Securitization Issuer” or “TICC CLO”), a subsidiary of TICC Capital Corp. 2011-1 Holdings, LLC (“Holdings”), which is in turn a direct subsidiary of TICC. The Class A Notes are secured by the assets held by the 2011 Securitization Issuer. The securitization was executed through a private placement of $101.25 million of secured notes rated AAA/Aaa by Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (“S&P”) and Moody’s Investors Service Inc. (“Moody’s”), respectively, and bearing interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.25%. Holdings retained all of the subordinated notes, which totaled $123.75 million (the “2011 Subordinated Notes”), and retained all the membership interests in the 2011 Securitization Issuer.

On August 23, 2012, the Company completed a $160 million debt securitization financing transaction, consisting of $120 million in secured notes and $40 million of subordinated notes. On February 25, 2013 and May 28, 2013, TICC CLO 2012-1 issued additional secured notes totaling an aggregate of $120 million and subordinated notes totaling an aggregate of $40 million, which subordinated notes were purchased by the Company, under the “accordion” feature of the debt securitization which allowed, under certain circumstances and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for an increase in the amount of secured and subordinated notes. It is not necessary that the Company own all or any of the notes permitted by this feature, which may affect the accounting treatment of the debt securitization financing transaction. As of December 31, 2013 the secured notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer have an aggregate face amount of $240 million and were issued in four classes. The class A-1 notes have a current face amount of $176 million, are rated AAA(sf)/Aaa(sf) by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P) and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s), respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 1.75%. The class B-1 notes have a current face amount of $20 million, are rated AA(sf)/Aa2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. The class C-1 notes have a current face amount of $23 million, are rated A(sf)/A2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 4.75%. The class D-1 notes have a current face amount of $21 million, are rated BBB(sf)/Baa2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 5.75%. TICC presently owns all of the subordinated notes, which totaled $80 million as of December 31, 2013.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

On September 26, 2012, we completed a private placement of 5-year unsecured 7.50% Senior Convertible Notes Due 2017 (the “Convertible Notes”). A total of $105.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes were issued at the closing. An additional $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes were issued on October 22, 2012 pursuant to the exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of our common stock based on an initial conversion rate of 87.2448 shares of our common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $11.46 per share of common stock. The conversion price for the Convertible Notes will be reduced for quarterly cash dividends paid to common shares to the extent that the quarterly dividend exceeds $0.29 cents per share, subject to adjustment. The Convertible Notes bear interest at an annual rate of 7.50%, payable semiannually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, beginning May 1, 2013. The Convertible Notes mature on November 1, 2017, unless previously converted in accordance with their terms. The Convertible Notes are our general unsecured obligations, rank equally in right of payment with our future senior unsecured debt, and rank senior in right of payment to any potential subordinated debt, should any be issued in the future.

Borrowings (including through the securitization transactions described above, which are consolidated in our financial statements), also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and, therefore, increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. We may borrow from and issue senior debt securities to banks, insurance companies, and other lenders. Lenders of these senior securities have fixed dollar claims on our assets that are superior to the claims of our common stockholders. If the value of our assets increases, then leveraging would cause the net asset value attributable to our common stock to increase more sharply than it would have had we not leveraged. Conversely, if the value of our assets decreases, leveraging would cause net asset value to decline more sharply than it otherwise would have had we not leveraged. Similarly, any increase in our income in excess of interest payable on the borrowed funds would cause our net income to increase more than it would without the leverage, while any decrease in our income would cause net income to decline more sharply than it would have had we not borrowed. Such a decline could negatively affect our ability to make common stock dividend payments. Leverage is generally considered a speculative investment technique. Our ability to service any debt that we incur will depend largely on our financial performance and will be subject to prevailing economic conditions and competitive pressures. Moreover, as the management fee payable to TICC Management will be payable on our gross assets, including those assets acquired through the use of leverage, TICC Management may have a financial incentive to incur leverage which may not be consistent with our stockholders’ interests. In addition, our common stockholders will bear the burden of any increase in our expenses as a result of leverage, including any increase in the management fee payable to TICC Management.

Illustration.  The following table illustrates the effect of leverage on returns from an investment in our common stock assuming various annual returns on the portfolio, net of expenses. The calculations in the table below are hypothetical and actual returns may be higher or lower than those appearing in the table below.

		Assumed total return on our portfolio (net of expenses)
		(10.0)%				(5.0)%				0.0%				5.0%				10.0%
Corresponding return to stockholder(1)			(21.7	)%			(12.5	)%			(3.3	)%			5.9	%			15.1	%

Pending legislation may allow us to incur additional leverage.

As a BDC, under the 1940 Act generally we are not permitted to incur indebtedness unless immediately after such borrowing we have an asset coverage for total borrowings of at least 200% (i.e., the amount of debt may not exceed 50% of the value of our assets). On June 8, 2012, legislation was introduced in the U.S. House of Representatives intended to revise certain regulations applicable to BDCs. The legislation, among other things, provides for increasing the amount of funds BDCs may borrow by reducing asset to debt

TABLE OF CONTENTS

limitations from 2:1 to 3:2. As a result, we may be able to incur additional indebtedness in the future and therefore your risk of an investment in shares of our common stock may increase.

We are subject to risks associated with our debt securitization financing transactions.

As a result of the debt securitization financing transactions that we completed on August 10, 2011 and August 23, 2012, we are subject to a variety of risks, including those set forth below:

We are subject to certain risks as a result of our indirect interests in the subordinated notes and membership interests of the 2011 Securitization Issuer and our direct interests in the subordinated notes and membership interests of the 2012 Securitization Issuer.

Under the terms of the master loan sale agreement governing TICC CLO, (1) we sold and/or contributed to Holdings all of our ownership interest in our portfolio loans and participations for the purchase price and other consideration set forth in the master loan sale agreement and (2) Holdings, in turn, sold and/or contributed to the 2011 Securitization Issuer all of its ownership interest in such portfolio loans and participations for the purchase price and the consideration set forth in the master loan sale agreement. Under the terms of the master loan sale agreement governing TICC CLO 2012-1, we sold directly to the 2012 Securitization Issuer all of our ownership interest in our portfolio loans and participations for the purchase price and other consideration set forth in the master loan sale agreement. Following these transfers, the 2011 Securitization Issuer and the 2012 Securitization Issuer (collectively, the “Securitization Issuers”), and not Holdings or us, held all of the ownership interest in such portfolio loans and participations. As a result of TICC CLO, we hold indirectly through Holdings the 2011 Subordinated Notes as well as membership interests, which comprise 100% of the equity interests, in the 2011 Securitization Issuer. As a result of TICC CLO 2012-1, we hold directly the 2012 Subordinated Notes as well as membership interests, which comprise 100% of the equity interests, in the 2012 Securitization Issuer. As a result, we consolidate the financial statements of Holdings and the Securitization Issuers in our consolidated financial statements. Because Holdings and each Securitization Issuer is disregarded as an entity separate from its owner for U.S. federal income tax purposes, each of the sale or contribution of portfolio loans by us to Holdings, the sale of portfolio loans by Holdings to the 2011 Securitization Issuer, and the sale of portfolio loans by us to the 2012 Securitization Issuer, did not constitute a taxable event for U.S. federal income tax purposes. If the U.S. Internal Revenue Service were to take a contrary position, there could be a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows. The securities issued by the Securitization Issuers, or by any securitization vehicle we sponsor in the future, could be acquired by another business development company or securitization vehicle subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions. We may also, from time to time, hold asset-backed securities, or the economic equivalent thereof, issued by a securitization vehicle sponsored by another business development company to the extent permitted under the 1940 Act.

The 2011 Subordinated Notes, the 2012 Subordinated Notes and membership interests of each Securitization Issuer are subordinated obligations of such Securitization Issuer.

The 2011 Subordinated Notes and the 2012 Subordinated Notes (collectively, the “Subordinated Notes”) are the junior class of notes issued by each Securitization Issuer, are subordinated in priority of payment to the secured notes issued by the 2011 Securitization Issuer and the 2012 Securitization Issuer (collectively, the “Secured Notes”), respectively, and are subject to certain payment restrictions set forth in the respective indentures governing the notes of each Securitization Issuer. Therefore, for TICC CLO, Holdings only receives cash distributions on the 2011 Subordinated Notes if the 2011 Securitization Issuer has made all cash interest payments on the Secured Notes it has issued, and we only receive cash distributions in respect of our indirect ownership of the 2011 Securitization Issuer to the extent that Holdings receives any cash distributions in respect of its direct ownership of the 2011 Securitization Issuer. For TICC CLO 2012-1, we only receive cash distributions on the 2012 Subordinated Notes if the 2012 Securitization Issuer has made all cash interest payments on the Secured Notes it has issued, and we only receive cash distributions in respect of our ownership of the 2012 Securitization Issuer to the extent that funds are available therefor. The Subordinated Notes of a Securitization Issuer are also unsecured and rank behind all of the secured creditors, known or unknown, of such Securitization Issuer, including the holders of the Secured Notes it has issued. Consequently, to the extent that the value of either Securitization Issuer’s portfolio of loan investments has been reduced as a result of conditions in the credit markets, or as a result of defaulted loans or individual fund assets, the value of the Subordinated Notes of such Securitization Issuer at their redemption could be reduced. Accordingly, our investment in each Securitization Issuer may be subject to complete loss.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The membership interests in each Securitization Issuer represent all of the equity interest in such Securitization Issuer. As such, the holder of the membership interests of a Securitization Issuer is the residual claimant on distributions, if any, made by such Securitization Issuer after holders of all classes of notes issued by such Securitization Issuer have been paid in full on each payment date or upon maturity of such notes under the debt securitization financing transaction documents. Such payments may be made by each Securitization Issuer only to the extent permitted under such documents on any payment date or upon payment in full of the notes issued by such Securitization Issuer. We cannot assure you that distributions on the assets held by the Securitization Issuers will be sufficient to make any distributions to us or that such distributions will meet our expectations.

The interests of holders of the senior class of securities issued by each Securitization Issuer may not be aligned with our interests.

The Secured Notes of each Securitization Issuer are the debt obligations ranking senior in right of payment to the Subordinated Notes of such Securitization Issuer. As such, there are circumstances in which the interests of holders of the Secured Notes may not be aligned with the interests of holders of the Subordinated Notes and the membership interests of a Securitization Issuer. For example, under the terms of the Secured Notes of each Securitization Issuer, holders of the Secured Notes have the right to receive payments of principal and interest prior to holders of the Subordinated Notes and the membership interests of such Securitization Issuer.

For as long as the Secured Notes of a Securitization Issuer remain outstanding, holders of the Secured Notes have the right to act, in certain circumstances, with respect to the portfolio loans in ways that may benefit their interests but not the interests of holders of Subordinated Notes and membership interests of such Securitization Issuer, including by exercising remedies under the indenture in the debt securitization financing transaction.

If an event of default has occurred and acceleration occurs in accordance with the terms of an indenture, the Secured Notes of the applicable Securitization Issuer then outstanding will be paid in full before any further payment or distribution on the Subordinated Notes of such Securitization Issuer. In addition, if an event of default occurs, holders of a majority of the most senior class of Secured Notes then outstanding will be entitled to determine the remedies to be exercised under the indenture, subject to the terms of the indenture. For example, upon the occurrence of an event of default with respect to the notes issued by a Securitization Issuer, the trustee or holders of a majority of the most senior class of Secured Notes of such Securitization Issuer then outstanding may declare the principal, together with any accrued interest, of all the notes of such class and any junior classes to be immediately due and payable. This would have the effect of accelerating the principal on such notes, triggering a repayment obligation on the part of the Securitization Issuer. If at such time the portfolio loans of a Securitization Issuer were not performing well, such Securitization Issuer may not have sufficient proceeds available to enable the trustee under the indenture to repay the obligations of holders of the Subordinated Notes of such Securitization Issuer, or to pay a dividend to holders of the membership interests of such Securitization Issuer.

Remedies pursued by the holders of the Secured Notes of a Securitization Issuer could be adverse to the interests of the holders of the Subordinated Notes of such Securitization Issuer, and the holders of such Secured Notes will have no obligation to consider any possible adverse effect on such other interests. Thus, any remedies pursued by the holders of the Secured Notes of a Securitization Issuer may not be in our best interests and we may not receive payments or distributions upon an acceleration of the applicable Secured Notes. Any failure of a Securitization Issuer to make distributions on the Subordinated Notes we hold, directly or indirectly, whether as a result of an event of default or otherwise, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows and may result in an inability of us to make distributions sufficient to allow our qualification as a RIC.

The Securitization Issuers may fail to meet certain asset coverage tests.

Under the documents governing each debt securitization financing transaction, there are two coverage tests applicable to the Secured Notes. The first such test compares the amount of interest received on the portfolio loans held by the Securitization Issuer to the amount of interest payable in respect of the Secured Notes of such Securitization Issuer. For the TICC CLO, to meet this test at any time, interest received on the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

portfolio loans must equal at least 200% or greater (based upon a graduated scale provided for in the indenture) of the interest payable in respect of the Secured Notes of the 2011 Securitization Issuer. For the TICC CLO 2012-1, to meet this test at any time, interest received on the portfolio loans must equal at least 120% to 160% (based upon a graduated scale for the class of Secured Notes to which such test is applied as provided for in the indenture) of the interest payable in respect of the Secured Notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer. The second such test compares the principal amount of the portfolio loans held by the Securitization Issuer to the aggregate outstanding principal amount of the Secured Notes of such Securitization Issuer. For the TICC CLO, to meet this test at any time, the aggregate principal amount of the portfolio loans held by the 2011 Securitization Issuer must equal at least 135% of the outstanding principal amount of the Secured Notes of the 2011 Securitization Issuer. For the TICC CLO 2012-1, to meet this test at any time, the aggregate principal amount of the portfolio loans held by the 2012 Securitization Issuer must equal at least 126% to 152.50% (based upon a graduated scale for the class of Secured Notes to which such test is applied as provided for in the indenture) of the outstanding principal amount of the Secured Notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer. If either coverage test is not satisfied, interest and principal received by the Securitization Issuer are diverted on the following payment date to pay the most senior class or classes of Secured Notes to the extent necessary to cause all coverage tests to be satisfied on a pro forma basis after giving effect to all payments made in respect of the notes, which, with respect to the payment of any principal amount of the Secured Notes, we refer to as a mandatory redemption. For the TICC CLO, if any asset coverage test with respect to the Secured Notes is not met, proceeds from the portfolio of loan investments that otherwise would have been distributed to the 2011 Securitization Issuer and the holders of the 2011 Subordinated Notes will instead be used to redeem first the Secured Notes of the 2011 Securitization Issuer, to the extent necessary to satisfy the applicable asset coverage tests. For the TICC CLO 2012-1, if any asset coverage test with respect to the Secured Notes is not met or if the 2012 Securitization Issuer fails to obtain a confirmation of the initial ratings of the Secured Notes after the effective date (defined under the indenture as the earlier to occur of January 7, 2013 or the time that the 2012 Securitization Issuer has acquired (or committed to acquire) at least $160.0 million in assets), proceeds from the portfolio of loan investments that otherwise would have been distributed to the 2012 Securitization Issuer and the holders of the 2012 Subordinated Notes will instead be used to first to redeem the Secured Notes and pay interest and deferred interest (if any) on the Secured Notes, to the extent necessary to satisfy the applicable asset coverage tests or to obtain the necessary ratings confirmation.

We may not receive cash on our equity interests in the Securitization Issuers.

We receive cash from the Securitization Issuers only to the extent that we or Holdings, as applicable, receives payments on the Subordinated Notes or membership interests of the Securitization Issuers. The Securitization Issuers may only make payments on such securities to the extent permitted by the payment priority provisions of the respective indentures governing the notes, which generally provide that principal payments on the Subordinated Notes may not be made on any payment date unless all amounts owing under the Secured Notes issued under such indenture are paid in full. In addition, if a Securitization Issuer does not meet the asset coverage tests set forth in the documents governing the debt securitization financing transaction, cash would be diverted from the Subordinated Notes of such Securitization Issuer to first pay the Secured Notes of such Securitization Issuer in amounts sufficient to cause such tests to be satisfied. In the event that we fail to directly or indirectly receive cash from a Securitization Issuer, we could be unable to make such distributions in amounts sufficient to maintain our status as a RIC, or at all. We also could be forced to sell investments in portfolio companies at less than their fair value in order to continue making such distributions. However, the indentures place significant restrictions on the Securitization Issuers’ ability to sell investments. As a result, there may be times or circumstances during which the Securitization Issuers are unable to sell investments or take other actions that might be in our best interests.

We may incur liability to the 2011 Securitization Issuer and to the 2012 Securitization Issuer.

As part of the TICC CLO, we entered into a master loan sale agreement under which we would be required to repurchase any loan (or participation interest therein) which was sold to the 2011 Securitization Issuer in breach of any representation or warranty made by us with respect to such loan on the date such loan was sold. To the extent we fail to satisfy any such repurchase obligation, the trustee may, on behalf of the 2011 Securitization Issuer, bring an action against us to enforce these repurchase obligations. As part of the TICC CLO 2012-1, we entered into a master loan sale agreement under which we may incur liability to the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2012 Securitization Issuer for a breach of any representation or warranty made by us on the closing date with respect to any loan (or participation interest therein) sold to the 2012 Securitization Issuer thereunder.

In connection with our two debt securitization financing transactions, we transferred all of our interests in certain portfolio loans to the 2011 Securitization Issuer and the 2012 Securitization Issuer, respectively. In doing so, we transferred any right we previously had to the payments made on such portfolio loans in exchange for 100% of the residual interests in such securitization issuers. As a result, we face a heightened risk of loss due to the impact of leverage utilized by both the 2011 Securitization Issuer and the 2012 Securitization Issuer, which would have the effect of magnifying the impact on us of a loss on any portfolio loan held by such securitization issuers. In addition, while we serve as the collateral manager for both the 2011 Securitization Issuer and the 2012 Securitization Issuer, which provides us with the authority to enforce payment obligations and loan covenants of the portfolio loans that we transferred to such securitization issuers, we are required to exercise such authority for the interests of the securitization issuers, rather than for our own interests alone.

The structure of the debt securitization financing transactions is intended to prevent, in the event of our bankruptcy or, in the case of the TICC CLO, the bankruptcy of Holdings, the consolidation for purposes of such bankruptcy proceedings of the Securitization Issuers with our operations or, in the case of the TICC CLO, those of Holdings. If the true sale of these assets were not respected in the event of our insolvency, a trustee or debtor-in-possession might reclaim the assets of the Securitization Issuers for our estate. However, in doing so, we would become directly liable for all of the indebtedness then outstanding under the debt securitization financing transactions, which would equal the full amount of debt of the Securitization Issuers reflected on our consolidated balance sheet. In addition, we cannot assure that the recovery in the event we were consolidated with the Securitization Issuers for purposes of any bankruptcy proceeding would exceed the amount to which we would otherwise be entitled as a direct or indirect holder of the Subordinated Notes had we not been consolidated with the Securitization Issuers.

We may need to raise additional capital to grow because we must distribute most of our income.

We may need additional capital to fund growth in our investments. We expect to issue equity securities and expect to borrow from financial institutions in the future. A reduction in the availability of new capital could limit our ability to grow. We must distribute at least 90% of our investment company taxable income to our stockholders to maintain our regulated investment company status. As a result, any such cash earnings may not be available to fund investment originations. We expect to borrow from financial institutions and issue additional debt and equity securities. If we fail to obtain funds from such sources or from other sources to fund our investments, it could limit our ability to grow, which may have an adverse effect on the value of our securities. In addition, as a BDC, our ability to borrow or issue preferred stock may be restricted if our total assets are less than 200% of our total borrowings and preferred stock.

Regulations governing our operation as a BDC affect our ability to, and the way in which we raise additional capital, which may expose us to risks, including the typical risks associated with leverage.

Our ability to grow our business requires a substantial amount of capital, which we may acquire from the following sources:

Senior Securities and Other Indebtedness

We may issue debt securities or preferred stock and/or borrow money from banks or other financial institutions, which we refer to collectively as “senior securities,” up to the maximum amount permitted by the 1940 Act. Under the provisions of the 1940 Act, we are permitted, as a business development company, to issue senior securities in amounts such that our asset coverage ratio, as defined in the 1940 Act, equals at least 200% of gross assets less all liabilities and indebtedness not represented by senior securities, after each issuance of senior securities. This requirement of sustaining a 200% asset coverage ratio limits the amount that we may borrow. Because we will continue to need capital to grow our loan and investment portfolio, this limitation may prevent us from incurring debt. Further additional debt financing may not be available on favorable terms, if at all, or may be restricted by the terms of our debt facilities. If we are unable to incur additional debt, we may be required to raise additional equity at a time when it may be disadvantageous to do so.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

As a result of the issuance of senior securities, including preferred stock and debt securities, we are exposed to typical risks associated with leverage, including an increased risk of loss and an increase in expenses, which are ultimately borne by our common stockholders. Because we may incur leverage to make investments, a decrease in the value of our investments would have a greater negative impact on the value of our common stock. When we issue debt securities or preferred stock, it is likely that such securities will be governed by an indenture or other instrument containing covenants restricting our operating flexibility. In addition, such securities may be rated by rating agencies, and in obtaining a rating for such securities, we may be required to abide by operating and investment guidelines that could further restrict our operating flexibility. See “ — We are permitted to borrow money, which magnifies the potential for gain or loss on amounts invested and may increase the risk of investing in us” for a description of our outstanding senior securities.

Our ability to pay dividends or issue additional senior securities would be restricted if our asset coverage ratio was not at least 200%. If the value of our assets declines, we may be unable to satisfy this test. If that happens, we may be required to sell a portion of our investments and, depending on the nature of our leverage, repay a portion of our indebtedness at a time when such sales may be disadvantageous. Furthermore, any amounts that we use to service our indebtedness would not be available for distributions to our common stockholders.

Common Stock

We are not generally able to issue and sell our common stock at a price below net asset value per share. We may, however, sell our common stock, or warrants, options or rights to acquire our common stock, at a price below the then-current net asset value of our common stock if our Board of Directors determines that such sale is in the best interests of TICC and its stockholders, and our stockholders approve such sale. In certain limited circumstances, pursuant to an SEC staff interpretation, we may also issue shares at a price below net asset value in connection with a transferable rights offering so long as: (1) the offer does not discriminate among stockholders; (2) we use our best efforts to ensure an adequate trading market exists for the rights; and (3) the ratio of the offering does not exceed one new share for each three rights held. If we raise additional funds by issuing more common stock or senior securities convertible into, or exchangeable for, our common stock, the percentage ownership of our stockholders at that time would decrease and they may experience dilution. Moreover, we can offer no assurance that we will be able to issue and sell additional equity securities in the future, on favorable terms or at all.

Our Board of Directors is authorized to reclassify any unissued shares of common stock into one or more classes of preferred stock, which could convey special rights and privileges to its owners.

Our charter permits our Board of Directors to reclassify any authorized but unissued shares of stock into one or more classes of preferred stock. We are currently authorized to issue up to 100,000,000 shares of common stock, of which 53,400,745 shares are issued and outstanding as of March 17, 2014. In the event our Board of Directors opts to reclassify a portion of our unissued shares of common stock into a class of preferred stock, those preferred shares would have a preference over our common stock with respect to dividends and liquidation. The cost of any such reclassification would be borne by our existing common stockholders. The class voting rights of any preferred shares we may issue could make it more difficult for us to take some actions that may, in the future, be proposed by our Board of Directors and/or the holders of our common stock, such as a merger, exchange of securities, liquidation, or alteration of the rights of a class of our securities, if these actions were perceived by the holders of preferred shares as not in their best interests. The issuance of preferred shares convertible into shares of common stock might also reduce the net income and net asset value per share of our common stock upon conversion. These effects, among others, could have an adverse effect on your investment in our common stock.

A change in interest rates may adversely affect our profitability.

Currently, only three of the debt investments in our investment portfolio are at a fixed rate, while the others are at variable rates. In addition, our CLO equity investments are sensitive to changes in interest rates. Although we have not done so in the past, we may in the future choose to hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts, subject to applicable legal requirements. These activities may limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the hedged portfolio. Adverse developments resulting from changes in interest

TABLE OF CONTENTS

rates or hedging transactions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Also, we have limited experience in entering into hedging transactions, and we will initially have to purchase or develop such expertise if we choose to employ hedging strategies in the future.

We will be subject to corporate-level income tax if we are unable to qualify as a RIC for federal income tax purposes.

To remain entitled to the tax benefits accorded to RICs under the Code, we must meet certain income source, asset diversification and annual distribution requirements. In order to qualify as a RIC, we must derive each taxable year at least 90% of our gross income from dividends, interest, payments with respect to certain securities loans, gains from the sale of stock or other securities, or other income derived with respect to our business of investing in such stock or securities. The annual distribution requirement for a RIC is satisfied if we distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses, if any, to our stockholders on an annual basis. Because we use debt financing, we are subject to certain asset coverage ratio requirements under the 1940 Act and financial covenants under loan and credit agreements that could, under certain circumstances, restrict us from making distributions necessary to satisfy the annual distribution requirement. If we are unable to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for special tax treatment as a RIC and, thus, may be subject to corporate-level income tax on all of our income.

To qualify as a RIC, we must also meet certain asset diversification requirements at the end of each calendar quarter. Failure to meet these tests may result in our having to dispose of certain investments quickly in order to prevent the loss of RIC status. Because most of our investments will be in private companies, any such dispositions could be made at disadvantageous prices and may result in substantial losses. If we fail to qualify as a RIC for any reason and remain or become subject to corporate income tax, the resulting corporate taxes could substantially reduce our net assets, the amount of income available for distribution and the amount of our distributions. Such a failure would have a material adverse effect on us and our stockholders.

Our investments in CLOs may be subject to special anti-deferral provisions that could result in us incurring tax or recognizing income prior to receive cash distributions related to such income.

We have purchased and may in the future purchase residual or subordinated interests in CLOs that are treated for U.S. federal income tax purposes as shares in a “passive foreign investment company” (a “PFIC”). If we acquire shares in a PFIC (including equity tranche investments in CLOs that are PFICs), we may be subject to federal income tax on a portion of any “excess distribution” or gain from the disposition of such shares even if such income is distributed as a taxable dividend by us to our stockholders. Certain elections may be available to mitigate or eliminate such tax on excess distributions, but such elections (if available) will generally require us to recognize our share of the PFICs income for each year regardless of whether we receive any distributions from such PFICs. We must nonetheless distribute such income to maintain our status as a RIC.

If we hold more than 10% of the shares in a foreign corporation that is treated as a controlled foreign corporation (“CFC”) (including equity tranche investments in a CLO treated as CFC), we may be treated as receiving a deemed distribution (taxable as ordinary income) each year from such foreign corporation in an amount equal to our pro rata share of the corporation’s income for the tax year (including both ordinary earnings and capital gains). If we are required to include such deemed distributions from a CFC in our income, we will be required to distribute such income to maintain our RIC status regardless of whether or not the CFC makes an actual distribution during such year.

If we are required to include amounts in income prior to receiving distributions representing such income, we may have to sell some of our investments at times and/or at prices we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital or forgo new investment opportunities for this purpose. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus become subject to corporate-level income tax.

The CLOs in which we invest may be subject to withholding tax if they fail to comply with certain reporting requirements.

Legislation enacted in 2010 and Internal Revenue Service guidance impose a withholding tax of 30% on payments of U.S. source interest and dividends paid after December 31, 2013, or gross proceeds from the

TABLE OF CONTENTS

disposition of an instrument that produces U.S. source interest or dividends paid after December 31, 2016, to certain non-U.S. entities, including certain non-U.S. financial institutions and investment funds, unless such non-U.S. entity complies with certain reporting requirements regarding its United States account holders and its United States owners. Most CLO vehicles in which we invest will be treated as non-U.S. financial entities for this purpose, and therefore will be required to comply with these reporting requirements to avoid the 30% withholding. If a CLO vehicle in which we invest fails to properly comply with these reporting requirements, it could reduce the amounts available to distribute to equity and junior debt holders in such CLO vehicle, which could materially and adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.

We may choose to pay dividends in our own common stock, in which case, our stockholders may be required to pay federal income taxes in excess of the cash dividends they receive.

We may distribute taxable dividends that are payable in cash or shares of our common stock at the election of each stockholder. Under certain applicable provisions of the Code and the Treasury regulations, distributions payable in cash or in shares of stock at the election of stockholders are treated as taxable dividends. The Internal Revenue Service has issued private rulings indicating that this rule will apply even where the total amount of cash that may be distributed is limited to no more than 20% of the total distribution. Under these rulings, if too many stockholders elect to receive their distributions in cash, each such stockholder would receive a pro rata share of the total cash to be distributed and would receive the remainder of their distribution in shares of stock. If we decide to make any distributions consistent with these rulings that are payable in part in our stock, taxable stockholders receiving such dividends will be required to include the full amount of the dividend (whether received in cash, our stock, or a combination thereof) as ordinary income (or as long-term capital gain to the extent such distribution is properly reported as a capital gain dividend) to the extent of our current and accumulated earnings and profits for United States federal income tax purposes. As a result, a U.S. stockholder may be required to pay tax with respect to such dividends in excess of any cash received. If a U.S. stockholder sells the stock it receives as a dividend in order to pay this tax, the sales proceeds may be less than the amount included in income with respect to the dividend, depending on the market price of our stock at the time of the sale. Furthermore, with respect to non-U.S. stockholders, we may be required to withhold U.S. tax with respect to such dividends, including in respect of all or a portion of such dividend that is payable in stock. In addition, if a significant number of our stockholders determine to sell shares of our stock in order to pay taxes owed on dividends, it may put downward pressure on the trading price of our stock.

We may have difficulty paying our required distributions if we recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income.

For federal income tax purposes, we will include in income certain amounts that we have not yet received in cash, such as original issue discount, which may arise if we receive warrants in connection with the making of a loan or possibly in other circumstances, or contracted PIK interest, which represents contractual interest added to the loan balance and due at the end of the loan term. In addition, we may be required to accrue for federal income tax purposes amounts attributable to our investment in CLOs that may differ from the distributions received in respect of such investments. We also may be required to include in income certain other amounts that we will not receive in cash.

Because in certain cases we may recognize income before or without receiving cash representing such income, we may have difficulty satisfying the annual distribution requirement applicable to RICs. Accordingly, we may have to sell some of our investments at times we would not consider advantageous, raise additional debt or equity capital, reduce new investments or make taxable distributions of our stock or debt securities to meet that distribution requirement. If we are not able to obtain cash from other sources, we may fail to qualify for RIC tax treatment and thus be subject to corporate-level income tax.

In addition, original issue discount income for certain portfolio investments may or may not be included as a factor in the determination of the fair value of such investments.

There are significant potential conflicts of interest between TICC and our management team.

In the course of our investing activities, we pay management and incentive fees to TICC Management, and reimburse BDC Partners for certain expenses it incurs. As a result, investors in our common stock invest on a “gross” basis and receive distributions on a “net” basis after expenses, resulting in, among other things,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

a lower rate of return than one might achieve through direct investments. As a result of this arrangement, there may be times when the management team of TICC Management has interests that differ from those of our stockholders, giving rise to a conflict.

TICC Management receives a quarterly incentive fee based, in part, on our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income,” if any, for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. This incentive fee is subject to a quarterly hurdle rate before providing an incentive fee return to TICC Management. To the extent we or TICC Management are able to exert influence over our portfolio companies, the quarterly pre-incentive fee may provide TICC Management with an incentive to induce our portfolio companies to accelerate or defer interest or other obligations owed to us from one calendar quarter to another.

In addition, our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of TICC Management, and its managing member, BDC Partners, serve or may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in a line of business similar to our own. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders. Charles M. Royce, the non-executive Chairman of our Board of Directors, holds a minority, non-controlling interest in our investment adviser. BDC Partners is the managing member of Oxford Gate Capital, LLC, a private fund in which Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal are currently the sole investors.

Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal also currently serve as Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively, for T2 Advisers, LLC, which serves as the Collateral Manager of T2 Income Fund CLO I Ltd. BDC Partners is the managing member of T2 Advisers, LLC. Further, Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal currently serve as Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively, of Oxford Lane Capital Corp., a non-diversified closed-end management investment company that currently invests primarily in CLO debt and equity tranches, and its investment adviser, Oxford Lane Management. BDC Partners provides Oxford Lane Capital Corp. with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to an administration agreement and also serves as the managing member of Oxford Lane Management. In addition, Patrick F. Conroy, the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Corporate Secretary of TICC Management, BDC Partners and TICC, serves in the same capacities for Oxford Lane Capital Corp. and Oxford Lane Management and also serves as the Chief Financial Officer, Chief Compliance Officer and Treasurer of T2 Advisers, LLC. Because of these possible conflicts of interest, these individuals may direct potential business and investment opportunities to other entities rather than to us or such individuals may undertake or otherwise engage in activities or conduct on behalf of such other entities that is not in, or which may be adverse to, our best interests.

BDC Partners has adopted a written policy with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities among TICC, Oxford Lane Capital Corp., T2 Income Fund CLO I Ltd. and Oxford Gate Capital, LLC in view of the potential conflicts of interest raised by the relationships described above.

In the ordinary course of business, we may enter into transactions with portfolio companies that may be considered related party transactions. In order to ensure that we do not engage in any prohibited transactions with any persons affiliated with us, we have implemented certain policies and procedures whereby our executive officers screen each of our transactions for any possible affiliations between the proposed portfolio investment, us, companies controlled by us and our employees and directors. We will not enter into any agreements unless and until we are satisfied that doing so will not raise concerns under the 1940 Act or, if such concerns exist, we have taken appropriate actions to seek board review and approval or exemptive relief for such transaction. Our Board of Directors reviews these procedures on an annual basis.

We have also adopted a Code of Ethics which applies to, among others, our senior officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as all of our officers, directors and employees. Our Code of Ethics requires that all employees and directors avoid any conflict, or the appearance of a conflict, between an individual’s personal interests and our interests. Pursuant to our Code of Ethics, each employee and director must disclose any conflicts of interest, or actions or relationships that might give rise to a conflict, to our Chief Compliance Officer. Our Audit Committee is charged with approving any waivers under our Code of Ethics. As required by the NASDAQ Global Select Market corporate governance listing standards, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is also required to review and approve any transactions with related parties (as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Changes in laws or regulations governing our operations may adversely affect our business.

We and our portfolio companies are subject to regulation by laws at the local, state and federal levels. These laws and regulations, as well as their interpretation, may be changed from time to time. Any change in these laws or regulations could have a material adverse effect on our business. In particular, legislative initiatives relating to climate change, healthcare reform and similar public policy matters may impact the portfolio companies in which we invest to the extent they operate in industries that may be subject to such changes.

If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could fail to qualify as a business development company or be precluded from investing according to our current business strategy.

As a business development company, we may not acquire any assets other than “qualifying assets” unless, at the time of and after giving effect to such acquisition, at least 70% of our total assets are qualifying assets.

We believe that most of our portfolio investments will constitute qualifying assets. However, we may be precluded from investing in what we believe are attractive investments if such investments are not qualifying assets for purposes of the 1940 Act. If we do not invest a sufficient portion of our assets in qualifying assets, we could lose our status as a BDC, which would have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations. Similarly, these rules could prevent us from making follow-on investments in existing portfolio companies (which could result in the dilution of our position) or could require us to dispose of investments at inappropriate times in order to comply with the 1940 Act. If we need to dispose of such investments quickly, it would be difficult to dispose of such investments on favorable terms. For example, we may have difficulty in finding a buyer and, even if we do find a buyer, we may have to sell the investments at a substantial loss.

Provisions of the Maryland General Corporation Law and of our charter and bylaws could deter takeover attempts and have an adverse impact on the price of our common stock.

The Maryland General Corporation Law and our charter and bylaws contain provisions that may discourage, delay or make more difficult a change in control of TICC or the removal of our directors. We are subject to the Maryland Business Combination Act, subject to any applicable requirements of the 1940 Act. Our board of directors has adopted a resolution exempting from the Business Combination Act any business combination between us and any other person, subject to prior approval of such business combination by our board, including approval by a majority of our disinterested directors. If the resolution exempting business combinations is repealed or our board does not approve a business combination, the Business Combination Act may discourage third parties from trying to acquire control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating such an offer. Our bylaws exempt from the Maryland Control Share Acquisition Act acquisitions of our stock by any person. If we amend our bylaws to repeal the exemption from the Control Share Acquisition Act, the Control Share Acquisition Act also may make it more difficult for a third party to obtain control of us and increase the difficulty of consummating such a transaction. However, we will amend our bylaws to be subject to the Control Share Acquisition Act only if our board of directors determines that it would be in our best interests and if the SEC staff does not object to our determination that our being subject to the Control Share Acquisition Act does not conflict with the 1940 Act. The SEC staff has issued informal guidance setting forth its position that certain provisions of the Control Share Acquisition Act would, if implemented, violate Section 18(i) of the 1940 Act.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR INVESTMENTS

Our investment portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies, which will subject us to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt securities that we hold or if the sectors in which we invest experience a market downturn.

A consequence of our limited number of investments is that the aggregate returns we realize may be significantly adversely affected if a small number of investments perform poorly or if we need to write down the value of any one investment. Beyond our income tax asset diversification requirements, we do not have fixed guidelines for diversification, and our investments could be concentrated in relatively few issuers. On

TABLE OF CONTENTS

December 3, 2007, we changed our name from Technology Investment Capital Corp. to TICC Capital Corp. While we have historically focused on the technology sector, we expect to actively seek new investment opportunities outside this sector that otherwise meet our investment criteria. As a result, a market downturn, including a downturn in the sectors in which we invest, could materially adversely affect us.

Most of our debt investments will not fully amortize during their lifetime, which may subject us to the risk of loss of our principal in the event a portfolio company is unable to repay us prior to maturity.

Most of our debt investments are not structured to fully amortize during their lifetime. Accordingly, if a portfolio company has not previously pre-paid its debt investment to us, a significant portion of the principal amount due on such a debt investment may be due at maturity. In order to create liquidity to pay the final principal payment, a portfolio company typically must raise additional capital. If they are unable to raise sufficient funds to repay us, the debt investment may go into default, which may compel us to foreclose on the borrower’s assets, even if the debt investment was otherwise performing prior to maturity. This may deprive us from immediately obtaining full recovery on the debt investment and may prevent or delay the reinvestment of the investment proceeds in other, possibly more profitable investments.

Our equity investment distributions from CLO vehicles will be materially reduced if three month LIBOR increases modestly.

A modest increase in LIBOR will materially increase the CLO vehicles’ financing costs. Since most of the collateral positions within the CLO investments have LIBOR floors, there may not be corresponding increases in investment income (if LIBOR increases but stays below the LIBOR floor rate of such investments) resulting in materially smaller distribution payments to the equity investors.

The sectors in which we invest are subject to many risks, including volatility, intense competition, decreasing life cycles and periodic downturns which could result in a heightened risk of loss on your investment.

We invest in companies which may have relatively short operating histories. The revenues, income (or losses) and valuations of these companies can and often do fluctuate suddenly and dramatically. Also, the technology-related sector, on which we have historically focused, in particular, is generally characterized by abrupt business cycles and intense competition. The recent cyclical economic downturn has resulted in substantial decreases in the market capitalization of many companies. While such valuations have recovered to some extent, we can offer no assurance that such decreases in market capitalizations will not recur, or that any future decreases in valuations will be insubstantial or temporary in nature. Therefore, our portfolio companies may face considerably more risk of loss than companies in other industry sectors.

Our investments in the companies that we target may be extremely risky and we could lose all or part of our investments.

Although a prospective portfolio company’s assets are one component of our analysis when determining whether to provide debt capital, we generally do not base investment decisions primarily on the liquidation value of a company’s balance sheet assets. Instead, given the nature of the companies that we invest in, we also review the company’s historical and projected cash flows, equity capital and “soft” assets, including intellectual property (patented and non-patented), databases, business relationships (both contractual and non-contractual) and the like. Accordingly, considerably higher levels of overall risk will likely be associated with our portfolio compared with that of a traditional asset-based lender whose security consists primarily of receivables, inventories, equipment and other tangible assets. Interest rates payable by our portfolio companies may not compensate for these additional risks, any of which could cause us to lose part or all of our investment.

Specifically, investment in certain of the companies that we are invested in involves a number of significant risks, including:

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A portfolio company’s failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by us or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of its loans and foreclosure on its assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize our portfolio company’s ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that we hold. We may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if a portfolio company goes bankrupt, even though we may have structured our interest as senior debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which we actually provided significant “managerial assistance” to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might recharacterize our debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of our claim to that of other creditors.

Our failure to make follow-on investments in our portfolio companies could impair the value of our investment portfolio.

Following an initial investment in a portfolio company, we may make additional investments in that portfolio company as “follow-on” investments, in order to: (i) increase or maintain in whole or in part our equity ownership percentage; (ii) exercise warrants, options or convertible securities that were acquired in the original or subsequent financing; or (iii) attempt to preserve or enhance the value of our investment.

We may elect not to make follow-on investments or otherwise lack sufficient funds to make those investments. We have the discretion to make any follow-on investments, subject to the availability of capital resources. The failure to make follow-on investments may, in some circumstances, jeopardize the continued viability of a portfolio company and our initial investment, or may result in a missed opportunity for us to increase our participation in a successful operation. Even if we have sufficient capital to make a desired follow-on investment, we may elect not to make a follow-on investment because we may not want to increase our concentration of risk, because we prefer other opportunities, or because we are inhibited by compliance with business development company requirements or the desire to maintain our tax status.

Our incentive fee may induce TICC Management to use leverage and to make speculative investments.

The incentive fee payable by us to TICC Management may create an incentive for TICC Management to use leverage and to make investments on our behalf that are risky or more speculative than would be the case in the absence of such compensation arrangement. The way in which the incentive fee on “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” is determined, which is calculated as a percentage of the return on invested capital, may encourage TICC Management to use leverage to increase the return on our investments. Under certain circumstances, the use of leverage may increase the likelihood of default, which would disfavor holders of our common stock. Similarly, because TICC Management may also receive an incentive fee based, in part, upon the capital gains realized on our investments, the investment adviser may invest more than would otherwise be appropriate in companies whose securities are likely to yield capital gains, as compared to income producing

TABLE OF CONTENTS

securities. Such a practice could result in our investing in more speculative securities than would otherwise be the case, which could result in higher investment losses, particularly during an economic downturn.

Our portfolio companies may incur debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, our investments in such companies.

We intend to invest primarily in senior debt securities, but may also invest in subordinated debt securities, issued by our portfolio companies. In some cases, portfolio companies will be permitted to have other debt that ranks equally with, or senior to, the debt securities in which we invest. By their terms, such debt instruments may provide that the holders thereof are entitled to receive payment of interest or principal on or before the dates on which we are entitled to receive payments in respect of the debt securities in which we invest. Also, in the event of insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of a portfolio company, holders of debt instruments ranking senior to our investment in that portfolio company would typically be entitled to receive payment in full before we receive any distribution in respect of our investment. After repaying such senior creditors, such portfolio company may not have any remaining assets to use for repaying its obligations to us. In the case of debt ranking equally with debt securities in which we invest, we would have to share on an equal basis any distributions with other creditors holding such debt in the event of an insolvency, liquidation, dissolution, reorganization or bankruptcy of the relevant portfolio company. In addition, we will not be in a position to control any portfolio company by investing in its debt securities. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company in which we invest may make business decisions with which we disagree and the management of such companies, as representatives of the holders of their common equity, may take risks or otherwise act in ways that do not best serve our interests as debt investors.

Because we generally do not hold controlling equity interests in our portfolio companies, we may not be in a position to exercise control over our portfolio companies or to prevent decisions by the managements of our portfolio companies that could decrease the value of our investments.

Although we have taken and may in the future take controlling equity positions in our portfolio companies from time to time, we generally do not do so. As a result, we are subject to the risk that a portfolio company may make business decisions with which we disagree, and the stockholders and management of a portfolio company may take risks or otherwise act in ways that are adverse to our interests. Due to the lack of liquidity for the debt and equity investments that we typically hold in our portfolio companies, we may not be able to dispose of our investments in the event we disagree with the actions of a portfolio company, and may therefore suffer a decrease in the value of our investments.

Our investments in CLO vehicles may be riskier and less transparent than direct investments in portfolio companies.

From time to time we have invested and may in the future invest in debt and residual value interests of CLO vehicles. Generally, there may be less information available to us regarding the underlying debt investments held by such CLOs than if we had invested directly in the underlying companies. Our CLO investments will also be subject to the risk of leverage associated with the debt issued by such CLOs and the repayment priority of debt holders senior to us in such CLOs.

Some instruments issued by CLO vehicles may not be readily marketable and may be subject to restrictions on resale. Securities issued by CLO vehicles are generally not listed on any U.S. national securities exchange and no active trading market may exist for the securities of CLO vehicles in which we may invest. Although a secondary market may exist for our investments in CLO vehicles, the market for our investments in CLO vehicles may be subject to irregular trading activity, wide bid/ask spreads and extended trade settlement periods. As a result, these types of investments may be more difficult to value.

Failure by a CLO vehicle in which we are invested to satisfy certain tests will harm our operating results.

The failure by a CLO vehicle in which we invest to satisfy financial covenants, including with respect to adequate collateralization and/or interest coverage tests, could lead to a reduction in its payments to us. In the event that a CLO vehicle fails certain tests, holders of debt senior to us may be entitled to additional payments that would, in turn, reduce the payments we would otherwise be entitled to receive. Separately, we may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms, with a

TABLE OF CONTENTS

defaulting CLO vehicle or any other investment we may make. If any of these occur, it could materially and adversely affect our operating results and cash flows.

Our financial results may be affected adversely if one or more of our significant equity or junior debt investments in a CLO vehicle defaults on its payment obligations or fails to perform as we expect or if the market price fluctuates significantly in such illiquid investments.

Up to 30% of our portfolio may consist of equity and junior debt investments in CLO vehicles, which involves a number of significant risks. CLO vehicles that we invest in are typically very highly levered (10 – 14 times), and therefore, the junior debt and equity tranches that we invest in are subject to a higher degree of risk of total loss. In particular, investors in CLO vehicles indirectly bear risks of the underlying debt investments held by such CLO vehicles. We will generally have the right to receive payments only from the CLO vehicles, and will generally not have direct rights against the underlying borrowers or the entity that sponsored the CLO vehicle. While the CLO vehicles we have and continue to target generally enable the investor to acquire interests in a pool of leveraged corporate loans without the expenses associated with directly holding the same investments, when we invest in an equity tranche of a CLO vehicle we will generally pay a proportionate share of the CLO vehicles’ administrative and other expenses. Although it is difficult to predict whether the prices of indices and securities underlying CLO vehicles will rise or fall, these prices (and, therefore, the prices of the CLO vehicles) will be influenced by the same types of political and economic events that affect issuers of securities and capital markets generally.

The interests we intend to acquire in CLO vehicles will likely be thinly traded or have only a limited trading market. CLO vehicles are typically privately offered and sold, even in the secondary market. As a result, investments in CLO vehicles may be characterized as illiquid securities. In addition to the general risks associated with investing in debt securities, CLO vehicles carry additional risks, including, but not limited to: (i) the possibility that distributions from collateral securities will not be adequate to make interest or other payments; (ii) the quality of the collateral may decline in value or default; (iii) the fact that our investments in CLO tranches will likely be subordinate to other senior classes of note tranches thereof; and (iv) the complex structure of the security may not be fully understood at the time of investment and may produce disputes with the CLO vehicle or unexpected investment results.

Investments in structured vehicles, including equity and junior debt instruments issued by CLO vehicles, involve risks, including credit risk and market risk. Changes in interest rates and credit quality may cause significant price fluctuations. Additionally, changes in the underlying leveraged corporate loans held by a CLO vehicle may cause payments on the instruments we hold to be reduced, either temporarily or permanently.

Structured investments, particularly the subordinated interests in which we intend to invest, are less liquid than many other types of securities and may be more volatile than the leveraged corporate loans underlying the CLO vehicles we intend to target. Fluctuations in interest rates may also cause payments on the tranches of CLO vehicles that we hold to be reduced, either temporarily or permanently.

Investments in foreign securities may involve significant risks in addition to the risks inherent in U.S. investments.

Our investment strategy involves investments in securities issued by foreign entities, including foreign CLO vehicles that are formed under the laws of the Cayman Islands. Investing in foreign entities may expose us to additional risks not typically associated with investing in U.S. issues. These risks include changes in exchange control regulations, political and social instability, expropriation, imposition of foreign taxes, less liquid markets and less available information than is generally the case in the U.S., higher transaction costs, less government supervision of exchanges, brokers and issuers, less developed bankruptcy laws, difficulty in enforcing contractual obligations, lack of uniform accounting and auditing standards and greater price volatility. Further, we, and the CLO vehicles in which we invest, may have difficulty enforcing creditor’s rights in foreign jurisdictions, such as the Cayman Islands. In addition, the underlying companies of the CLO vehicles in which we invest may be foreign, which may create greater exposure for us to foreign economic developments.

Although we expect that most of our investments will be U.S. dollar-denominated, any investments denominated in a foreign currency will be subject to the risk that the value of a particular currency will change in relation to one or more other currencies. Among the factors that may affect currency values are

TABLE OF CONTENTS

trade balances, the level of short-term interest rates, differences in relative values of similar assets in different currencies, long-term opportunities for investment and capital appreciation, and political developments. We may employ hedging techniques to minimize these risks, but we can offer no assurance that we will, in fact, hedge currency risk, or that if we do, such strategies will be effective.

RISKS RELATED TO AN INVESTMENT IN OUR SECURITIES

Our common stock price may be volatile.

The trading price of our common stock may fluctuate substantially depending on many factors, some of which are beyond our control and may not be directly related to our operating performance. These factors include, but are not limited to, the following:

In the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has often been brought against that company. Due to the potential volatility of our stock price, we may therefore be the target of securities litigation in the future. Securities litigation could result in substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources from our business.

Our shares of common stock have traded at a discount from net asset value and may do so in the future.

Shares of closed-end investment companies have frequently traded at a market price that is less than the net asset value that is attributable to those shares. In part as a result of adverse economic conditions and increasing pressure within the financial sector of which we are a part, our common stock traded below our net asset value per share during some periods in 2010, 2011, 2012 and 2013. Our common stock could trade at a discount to net asset value at any time in the future. The possibility that our shares of common stock may trade at a discount from net asset value over the long term is separate and distinct from the risk that our net asset value will decrease. We cannot predict whether shares of our common stock will trade above, at or below our net asset value. If our common stock trades below its net asset value, we will generally not be able to issue additional shares of our common stock at its market price without first obtaining the approval for such issuance from our stockholders and our independent directors. If additional funds are not available to us, we could be forced to curtail or cease our new lending and investment activities, and our net asset value could decrease and our level of distributions could be impacted. Our net asset value may also decline over time if our principal recovery with respect to CLO equity investments is less than the price that we paid for those investments.

You may not receive dividends or our dividends may decline or may not grow over time.

We cannot assure you that we will achieve investment results or maintain a tax status that will allow or require any specified level of cash distributions or year-to-year increases in cash distributions. In particular, our future dividends are dependent upon the investment income we receive on our portfolio investments,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

including our higher-yielding CLO equity investments. To the extent such investment income, including income from our CLO equity investments (which we expect to decline as those vehicles de-leverage after the end of their respective re-investment periods), declines or if we transition our portfolio into lower-yielding investments, our ability to pay future dividends may be harmed.

Your interest in us may be diluted if you do not fully exercise your subscription rights in any rights offering.

In the event we issue subscription rights to purchase shares of our common stock, stockholders who do not fully exercise their rights should expect that they will, at the completion of the offer, own a smaller proportional interest in us than would otherwise be the case if they fully exercised their rights. We cannot state precisely the amount of any such dilution in share ownership because we do not know at this time what proportion of the shares will be purchased as a result of the offer.

In addition, if the subscription price is less than our net asset value per share, then our stockholders would experience an immediate dilution of the aggregate net asset value of their shares as a result of the offer. The amount of any decrease in net asset value is not predictable because it is not known at this time what the subscription price and net asset value per share will be on the expiration date of the rights offering or what proportion of the shares will be purchased as a result of the offer. Such dilution could be substantial.

If we issue preferred stock, the net asset value and market value of our common stock will likely become more volatile.

We cannot assure you that the issuance of preferred stock would result in a higher yield or return to the holders of the common stock. The issuance of preferred stock would likely cause the net asset value and market value of the common stock to become more volatile. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock were to approach the net rate of return on our investment portfolio, the benefit of leverage to the holders of the common stock would be reduced. If the dividend rate on the preferred stock were to exceed the net rate of return on our portfolio, the leverage would result in a lower rate of return to the holders of common stock than if we had not issued preferred stock. Any decline in the net asset value of our investments would be borne entirely by the holders of common stock. Therefore, if the market value of our portfolio were to decline, the leverage would result in a greater decrease in net asset value to the holders of common stock than if we were not leveraged through the issuance of preferred stock. This greater net asset value decrease would also tend to cause a greater decline in the market price for the common stock. We might be in danger of failing to maintain the required asset coverage of the preferred stock or of losing our ratings, if any, on the preferred stock or, in an extreme case, our current investment income might not be sufficient to meet the dividend requirements on the preferred stock. In order to counteract such an event, we might need to liquidate investments in order to fund a redemption of some or all of the preferred stock. In addition, we would pay (and the holders of common stock would bear) all costs and expenses relating to the issuance and ongoing maintenance of the preferred stock, including higher advisory fees if our total return exceeds the dividend rate on the preferred stock. Holders of preferred stock may have different interests than holders of common stock and may at times have disproportionate influence over our affairs.

Holders of any preferred stock we might issue would have the right to elect members of our Board of Directors and class voting rights on certain matters.

Holders of any preferred stock we might issue, voting separately as a single class, would have the right to elect two members of our Board of Directors at all times and in the event dividends become two full years in arrears would have the right to elect a majority of the directors until such arrearage is completely eliminated. In addition, preferred stockholders have class voting rights on certain matters, including changes in fundamental investment restrictions and conversion to open-end status, and accordingly can veto any such changes. Restrictions imposed on the declarations and payment of dividends or other distributions to the holders of our common stock and preferred stock, both by the 1940 Act and by requirements imposed by rating agencies, if any, or the terms of our credit facilities, if any, might impair our ability to maintain our qualification as a RIC for federal income tax purposes. While we would intend to redeem our preferred stock to the extent necessary to enable us to distribute our income as required to maintain our qualification as a RIC, there can be no assurance that such actions could be effected in time to meet the tax requirements.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The net asset value per share of our common stock may be diluted if we sell shares of our common stock in one or more offerings at prices below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock.

At our 2013 Annual Stockholders Meeting, subject to certain determinations required to be made by our board of directors, our stockholders approved our ability to sell or otherwise issue shares of our common stock, not exceeding 25% of our then outstanding common stock immediately prior to each such offering, at a price below the then current net asset value per share during a period beginning on June 5, 2013 and expiring on the earlier of the one-year anniversary of the date of the 2013 Annual Stockholders Meeting and the date of our 2014 Annual Stockholders Meeting, which is expected to be held in June 2014.

Any decision to sell shares of our common stock below its then current net asset value per share would be subject to the determination by our board of directors that such issuance is in our and our stockholders’ best interests.

If we were to sell shares of our common stock below its then current net asset value per share; such sales would result in an immediate dilution to the net asset value per share of our common stock. This dilution would occur as a result of the sale of shares at a price below the then current net asset value per share of our common stock and a proportionately greater decrease in the stockholders’ interest in our earnings and assets and their voting interest in us than the increase in our assets resulting from such issuance. Because the number of shares of common stock that could be so issued and the timing of any issuance is not currently known, the actual dilutive effect cannot be predicted.

Further, if our current stockholders do not purchase any shares to maintain their percentage interest, regardless of whether such offering is above or below the then current net asset value per share, their voting power will be diluted. For example, if we sell an additional 10% of our common shares at a 10% discount from net asset value, a stockholder who does not participate in that offering for its proportionate interest will suffer net asset value dilution of up to 1.0% or $10 per $1,000 of net asset value. For additional information and hypothetical examples of these risks, see “Sale of Common Stock Below Net Asset Value” and the prospectus supplement pursuant to which such sale is made.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable.

Item 2. Properties

We do not own any real estate or other physical properties materially important to our operation. Our headquarters are located at 8 Sound Shore Drive, Suite 255, Greenwich, Connecticut, where we occupy our office space pursuant to our Administration Agreement with BDC Partners. We believe that our office facilities are suitable and adequate for our business as it is presently conducted.

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

We are not currently subject to any material legal proceedings. From time to time, we may be a party to certain legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business, including proceedings relating to the enforcement of our rights under contracts with our portfolio companies. While the outcome of these legal proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, we do not expect that these proceedings will have a material effect upon our financial condition or results of operations.

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures.

Not applicable.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART II

Our common stock is traded on the NASDAQ Global Select Market under the symbol “TICC.” The following table sets forth the range of high and low sales prices of our common stock as reported on the NASDAQ Global Select Market and our net asset value per share as determined as of the last day of each quarter over the last two years:

						Price Range
		NAV(a)				High				Low
Fiscal 2013
Fourth quarter		$	9.85			$	10.85			$	9.53
Third quarter			9.90				10.19				9.45
Second quarter			9.75				10.19				8.96
First quarter			10.02				10.85				9.74
Fiscal 2012
Fourth quarter		$	9.90			$	10.57			$	8.84
Third quarter			9.85				11.09				9.47
Second quarter			9.47				9.90				8.50
First quarter			9.50				10.65				8.61

The last reported sale price for our common stock on the NASDAQ Global Select Market on March 14, 2014 was $10.00 per share. As of March 14, 2014, we had 174 shareholders of record.

Dividends

We currently intend to distribute a minimum of 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains, if any, on a quarterly basis to our stockholders, in accordance with our election to be treated, and intention to qualify annually, as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code. For a more detailed discussion of the requirements under Subchapter M, please refer to the discussion in “Business — Material U.S. Federal Income Tax Considerations” set forth above. The following table reflects the cash distributions, including dividends, dividends reinvested and returns of capital, if any, per share that we have declared on our common stock since 2012:

Date Declared

Record Date

Payment Date

Amount

Fiscal 2014

March 5, 2014

March 25, 2014

March 31, 2014

$

0.29

Fiscal 2013

October 29, 2013

December 17, 2013

December 31, 2013

$

0.29

July 30, 2013

September 16, 2013

September 30, 2013

0.29

April 30, 2013

June 14, 2013

June 28, 2013

0.29

February 28, 2013

March 22, 2013

March 29, 2013

0.29

Total (2013)

$

1.16

Fiscal 2012

November 1, 2012

December 17, 2012

December 31, 2012

$

0.29

July 26, 2012

September 14, 2012

September 28, 2012

0.29

May 2, 2012

June 15, 2012

June 29, 2012

0.27

March 1, 2012

March 21, 2012

March 30, 2012

0.27

Total (2012)

$

1.12

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In order to qualify as a RIC and to avoid corporate level tax on the income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required, under Subchapter M of the Code, to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and realized net short-term capital gains in excess of realized net long-term capital losses to our stockholders on an annual basis.

To the extent our taxable earnings fall below the total amount of our distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to our stockholders. Thus, the source of a distribution to our stockholders may be the original capital invested by the stockholder rather than our taxable ordinary income or capital gains. Stockholders should read any written disclosure accompanying a dividend payment carefully and should not assume that the source of any distribution is our taxable ordinary income or capital gains.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, our distributions were made from net investment income and capital gains. A written statement identifying the nature of these distributions for tax reporting purposes for the year was posted on our website. We may not be able to achieve operating results that will allow us to make distributions at a specific level or to increase the amount of these distributions from time to time. In addition, we may be limited in our ability to make distributions due to the asset coverage requirements applicable to us as a business development company under the 1940 Act. If we do not distribute a certain percentage of our income annually, we will suffer adverse tax consequences, including possible loss of favorable regulated investment company tax treatment. We cannot assure shareholders that they will receive any distributions.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities

While we did not engage in any sales of unregistered securities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2013, we issued a total of 337,286 shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan. This issuance was not subject to the registration requirements of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended. The aggregate valuation price for the shares of common stock issued under the dividend reinvestment plan was approximately $3.2 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Performance Graph

This graph compares the return on our common stock with that of the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Financial 100, as we do not believe there is an appropriate index of companies with an investment strategy similar to our own with which to compare the return on our common stock, for the period from December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2013. The graph assumes that, on December 31, 2008, a person invested $100 in each of our common stock, the NASDAQ Composite Index and the NASDAQ Financial 100, which includes the 100 largest domestic and international financial organizations listed on the NASDAQ Stock Market based on market capitalization. The NASDAQ Financial 100 contains banks and savings institutions and related holding companies, insurance companies, broker-dealers, investment companies and financial services organizations.

The graph measures total shareholder return, which takes into account both changes in stock price and dividends. It assumes that dividends paid are reinvested in like securities.

The graph and the information furnished under this Part II Item 5 of this Form 10-K shall not be deemed to be “soliciting material” or to be “filed” with the SEC or subject to Regulation 14A or 14C, or to the liabilities of Section 18 of the 1934 Act. The stock price performance included in the above graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 6. Selected Financial and Other Data

The following selected financial data for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009 is derived from our consolidated financial statements which have been audited by PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, our independent registered public accounting firm. The data should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and related notes thereto and “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this report.

		Year Ended December 31, 2013				Year Ended December 31, 2012				Year Ended December 31, 2011				Year Ended December 31, 2010				Year Ended December 31, 2009
Total Investment Income		$	105,092,143			$	71,174,920			$	45,188,190			$	33,506,591			$	20,507,792
Total Expenses		$	49,299,511			$	33,997,566			$	15,188,049			$	9,263,094			$	7,015,808
Net Investment Income		$	55,792,632			$	37,177,354			$	30,000,141			$	24,243,497			$	13,491,984
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations		$	58,944,734			$	68,323,188			$	14,208,865			$	63,947,441			$	35,182,458
Per Share Data:
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Net Investment Income per common share (Basic)		$	1.09			$	0.98			$	0.92			$	0.89			$	0.51
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Net Investment Income per common share (Diluted)		$	1.03			$	0.96			$	0.92			$	0.89			$	0.51
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations per common share (Basic)		$	1.15			$	1.80			$	0.44			$	2.35			$	1.32
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations per common share (Diluted)		$	1.09			$	1.73			$	0.44			$	2.35			$	1.32
Distributions Declared per Share		$	1.16			$	1.12			$	0.99			$	0.81			$	0.60
Balance Sheet Data:
Total Assets		$	998,165,741			$	756,023,040			$	424,119,570			$	317,900,083			$	225,340,291
Total Long Term Debt		$	450,676,340			$	330,334,446			$	99,710,826			$	—			$	—
Total Net Assets		$	526,242,427			$	409,602,529			$	305,101,991			$	314,117,541			$	224,091,995
Other Data:
Number of Portfolio Companies at Period End			91				89				82				50				35
Purchases of Loan Originations		$	577,500,000			$	494,600,000			$	272,500,000			$	129,800,000			$	65,700,000
Loan Repayments		$	203,900,000			$	191,200,000			$	107,900,000			$	73,800,000			$	65,600,000
Proceeds from Loan Sales		$	118,500,000			$	69,300,000			$	11,300,000			$	54,800,000			$	14,000,000
Total Return(1)			14.68	%			30.49	%			(14.19	)%			102.39	%			81.15	%
Weighted Average Yield on Debt Investments at Period End(2)			8.7	%			9.4	%			11.3	%			14.1	%			9.0	%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS

This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about TICC, our current and prospective portfolio investments, our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as “anticipates,” “expects,” “intends,” “plans,” “will,” “may,” “continue,” “believes,” “seeks,” “estimates,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “targets,” “projects,” and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:

These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation:

Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and levels of profitability and the availability of additional capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this annual report on Form 10-K should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in “Risk Factors” and elsewhere in this annual report on Form 10-K. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this annual report on Form 10-K.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our consolidated financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Form 10-K.

OVERVIEW

Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolio’s total return. Our primary focus is to seek current income by investing in corporate debt securities. We have also invested and may continue to invest in structured finance investments, including CLO vehicles, which own debt securities. We may also invest in publicly traded debt and/or equity securities. We operate as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company and have elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the “1940 Act”). We have elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company (“RIC”), under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the “Code”), beginning with our 2003 taxable year.

Our investment activities are managed by TICC Management, a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. TICC Management is owned by BDC Partners, its managing member, and Charles M. Royce, our non-executive Chairman, who holds a minority, non-controlling interest in TICC Management. Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are the controlling members of BDC Partners. Under an investment advisory agreement (the “Investment Advisory Agreement”), we have agreed to pay TICC Management an annual base fee calculated on gross assets, and an incentive fee based upon our performance. Under an amended and restated administration agreement (the “Administration Agreement”), we have agreed to pay or reimburse BDC Partners, as administrator, for certain expenses incurred in operating TICC. Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of TICC Management and BDC Partners, serve or may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in a line of business similar to our own. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders.

On August 10, 2011, we completed a $225.0 million debt securitization financing transaction. On August 23, 2012, we completed our second such transaction, a $160.0 million debt securitization financing. On February 25, 2013 and on May 28, 2013, we completed the sale of an aggregate of $120.0 million of additional secured notes and an aggregate of $40.0 million of subordinated notes in connection with these transactions. On September 26, 2012, we completed a private placement of 5-year unsecured 7.50% Senior Convertible Notes Due 2017 (the “Convertible Notes”). A total of $105.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes were issued at the closing. An additional $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes were issued on October 22, 2012 pursuant to the exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Convertible Notes. For more information about these transactions, see “— Liquidity and Capital Resources — Borrowings.”

We generally expect to invest between $5 million and $50 million in each of our portfolio companies, although this investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our capital base changes and market conditions warrant, and accrue interest at fixed or variable rates. We expect that our investment portfolio will be diversified among a large number of investments with few investments, if any, exceeding 5% of the total portfolio. As of December 31, 2013, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 3.94% and 15.00% and maturity dates of between 15 and 136 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 8.7%.

Our loans may carry a provision for deferral of some or all of the interest payments and amendment fees, which will be added to the principal amount of the loan. This form of deferred income is referred to as “payment-in-kind,” or “PIK,” interest or other income and, when earned, is recorded as interest or other income and an increase in the principal amount of the loan. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized approximately $2.2 million from PIK interest income associated with our investments in Unitek Global Solutions, Inc., Merrill Communications, LLC and RBS Holding Company compared to PIK interest of approximately $5.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. In the event we recognize deferred loan interest income in excess of our available capital as a result of our receipt of PIK income, we may be required to liquidate assets in order to pay a portion of the incentive fee due to TICC Management.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

We have historically borrowed funds to make investments and may continue to borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to TICC Management, will be borne by our common stockholders.

In addition, as a BDC under the 1940 Act, we are required to make available significant managerial assistance, for which we may receive fees, to our portfolio companies. These fees would be generally non-recurring, however in some instances they may have a recurring component. We have received no fee income for managerial assistance to date.

Prior to making an investment, we may enter into a non-binding term sheet with the potential portfolio company. These term sheets are generally subject to a number of conditions, including but not limited to the satisfactory completion of our due diligence investigations of the company’s business and legal documentation for the loan.

To the extent possible, we will generally seek to invest in loans that are collateralized by a security interest in the borrower’s assets or guaranteed by a principal to the transaction. Interest payments, if not deferred, are normally payable quarterly with most debt investments having scheduled principal payments on a monthly or quarterly basis. When we receive a warrant to purchase stock in a portfolio company, the warrant will typically have a nominal strike price, and will entitle us to purchase a modest percentage of the borrower’s stock.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we closed approximately $577.5 million in portfolio investments, including additional investments of approximately $222.5 million in existing portfolio companies and approximately $355.0 million in new portfolio companies. During the year ended December 31, 2013, we recognized a total of $203.9 million from principal repayments on debt investments, and we recognized approximately $118.5 million from the sale of portfolio investments. We realized net gains on investments during the year ended December 31, 2013 in the amount of approximately $6.4 million. For the year ended December 31, 2013, we had net unrealized depreciation of approximately $3.2 million.

Current Market and Economic Conditions

Over the past several years, the market for debt and credit-related investments has become more competitive and yields have generally decreased. We expect the market for new corporate debt investments to remain generally competitive in 2014, especially with regard to the larger company portion of the corporate loan market. In view of that perspective, we continue to invest with a focus on smaller broadly-syndicated and middle-market loans, and we continue to be focused on certain structured finance investments, including collateralized loan obligation investment vehicles.

PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY

The total value of our investments was approximately $931.6 million and $667.5 million at December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively. The increase in investments during the year ended December 31, 2013 was due to purchases of portfolio investments of approximately $577.5 million, debt repayments and sales of securities of approximately $322.4 million, as well as by the fair value adjustments on our portfolio. The value of cash and cash equivalents decreased by approximately $36.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2013. Our gross originations totaled approximately $494.6 million during the year ended December 31, 2012.

In certain instances we receive payments in our loan portfolio based on scheduled amortization of the outstanding balances. In addition, we receive repayments of some of our loans prior to their scheduled maturity date. The frequency or volume of these repayments may fluctuate significantly from period to period.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, we had $203.9 million and $191.2 million, respectively, of loan repayments. The most significant repayments during the year ended December 31, 2013 were as follows (in millions):

Portfolio Company		2013 Repayments
Endurance International Group, Inc		$	29.1
SourceHov, LLC			17.0
Compucom Systems, Inc.			15.0
Global Tel Link Corp			11.5
Six3 Systems, Inc			11.0
Healogics Inc. (F/K/A “National Healing Corp.”)			10.7
Renaissance Learning			10.0
Blue Coat System, Inc			9.7
Pegasus Solutions, Inc			9.0
Merrill Communications, LLC			8.9
Nextag, Inc			8.5
Sportsmans' Warehouse			8.0
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc			7.8
Trinet Group, Inc			7.5
US FT HoldCo. Inc. (A/K/A FundTech)			6.0
Net all other			34.2
Total repayments		$	203.9

Portfolio activity also reflects sales of securities in the amounts of $118.5 million and $69.3 million for 2013 and 2012, respectively. The most significant sales during the year ended December 31, 2013 were as follows (in millions):

Portfolio Company		2013 Sales
Muir Grove CLO Ltd		$	7.8
Hewetts Island CDO IV			7.5
Hewetts Island CDO III			6.4
CHS/Community Health Systems, Inc			5.0
Skillsoft Corporation			5.0
Lightpoint CLO VIII LTD			5.0
Petco, Inc			4.9
Harbourview CLO 2006-1 LTD			4.2
GSC Group CDO			4.2
Saratoga Investment Corp			4.0
Cunningham Lindsey Group, Inc			4.0
Radnet Management Inc			3.9
Pegasus Solutions, Inc			3.8
CIFC Funding 2013-II			3.6
Landmark V CDO LTD 2005-1X B2L			3.5
US FT HoldCo. Inc. (A/K/A FundTech)			3.5
Net all other			42.2
Total sales		$	118.5

TABLE OF CONTENTS

For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded net realized capital gains on investments of approximately $6.4 million, which represents the gain on the sale of several of our CLO debt and equity investments which totaled approximately $10.4 million partially offset by the loss associated with the write-off of our investment in Genutec Business Solutions of approximately $4.7 million.

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the year ended December 31, 2013, we had net unrealized losses of approximately $3.2 million, comprised of $36.3 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $29.6 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $9.9 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation as certain investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the year ended December 31, 2013 were as follows (in millions):

Portfolio Company		Changes in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
RBS Holding Company		$	8.2
Merrill Communications, LLC			7.8
Genutec Business Solutions			4.7
Other CLO equity related investments			3.9
Benefit Street Partners CLO II, Ltd.			3.0
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc.			2.2
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2013-2, Ltd			1.5
Band Digital, Inc.			1.3
Ares XXVI CLO Ltd.			1.1
Hewetts Island CDO IV, Ltd.			(1.1	)
Pegasus Solutions, Inc.			(1.6	)
Jersey Street CLO, Ltd.			(1.6	)
Canaras Summit CLO Ltd.			(2.0	)
ACA CLO 2006-2, Limited			(2.2	)
GSC Partners 2007-8X CDO			(2.2	)
Hewetts Island CDO III 2005-1, Ltd.			(2.2	)
Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd.			(2.2	)
Lightpoint CLO VIII, Ltd.			(3.0	)
ACA CLO 2007-1, Ltd.			(3.0	)
CS Advisors CLO I Ltd.			(3.7	)
Nextag, Inc.			(3.9	)
Stone Tower CLO VII Ltd.			(4.9	)
Net all other(1)			(3.3	)
Total		$	(3.2	)

At December 31, 2013, we had investments in debt securities or loans to 68 portfolio companies with a fair value of approximately $679.4 million, and equity investments of approximately $252.2 million. These debt investments included approximately $2.1 million in accrued PIK interest, which, as described in “Overview” above, is added to the carrying value of our investments, reduced by repayments of principal.

At December 31, 2012, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, 73 portfolio companies, with a fair value totaling approximately $550.6 million, and equity investments of approximately $116.9 million. The debt investments include approximately $4.9 million in accrued PIK interest which, as described in “— Overview” above, is added to the carrying value of our investments, reduced by repayments of principal.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

A reconciliation of the investment portfolio for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 follows:

		December 31, 2013				December 31, 2012
		(dollars in millions)				(dollars in millions)
Beginning Investment Portfolio		$	667.5			$	391.5
Portfolio Investments Acquired			577.5				494.6
Debt repayments			(203.9	)			(191.2	)
Sales of securities			(118.5	)			(69.3	)
Payment in Kind(1)			2.1				4.9
Original Issue Discount			3.7				5.8
Net Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)			(3.2	)			14.3
Net Realized Gains (Losses)			6.4				16.9
Ending Investment Portfolio		$	931.6			$	667.5

The following table indicates the quarterly portfolio investment activity for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

		New Investments				Debt Repayments				Sales of Securities
		(dollars in millions)				(dollars in millions)				(dollars in millions)
Quarter ended
December 31, 2013		$	85.2			$	66.0			$	26.2
September 30, 2013			85.0				22.3				39.6
June 30, 2013			190.8				85.8				17.7
March 31, 2013			216.5				29.8				35.0
Total		$	577.5			$	203.9			$	118.5
December 31, 2012		$	247.0			$	75.3			$	48.8
September 30, 2012			128.0				45.3				9.0
June 30, 2012			62.1				66.2				2.5
March 31, 2012			57.5				4.4				9.0
Total		$	494.6			$	191.2			$	69.3

The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by asset class as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

		2013								2012
		Investments at Fair Value				Percentage of Total Portfolio				Investments at Fair Value				Percentage of Total Portfolio
		(dollars in millions)								(dollars in millions)
Senior Secured Notes		$	644.7				69.2	%		$	494.9				74.1	%
Senior Unsecured Notes			5.8				0.6	%			—				—
CLO Equity			237.1				25.5	%			109.3				16.4	%
CLO Debt			28.9				3.1	%			55.6				8.3	%
Subordinated Notes			—				—				0.1				0.0	%
Common Stock			13.8				1.5	%			4.4				0.7	%
Preferred Shares			0.4				0.0	%			2.7				0.4	%
Warrants			0.9				0.1	%			0.5				0.1	%
Total		$	931.6				100.0	%		$	667.5				100.0	%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table shows our portfolio of investments by industry at fair value, in thousands, as of December 31, 2013 and 2012:

		December 31, 2013								December 31, 2012
		Investments at Fair Value				Percentage of Fair Value				Investments at Fair Value				Percentage of Fair Value
Structured finance(1)		$	266.0				28.6	%		$	164.9				24.7	%
Software			77.2				8.3	%			35.9				5.4	%
Financial intermediaries			71.7				7.7	%			65.2				9.8	%
Printing and publishing			69.9				7.5	%			7.8				1.2	%
Business services			69.5				7.4	%			60.7				9.1	%
Telecommunication services			51.7				5.5	%			32.8				4.9	%
Retail			39.0				4.2	%			39.6				5.9	%
Enterprise software			38.9				4.2	%			50.9				7.6	%
Chemicals and plastics			28.6				3.1	%			0.0				0.0	%
IT consulting			26.8				2.9	%			22.0				3.3	%
Travel			26.3				2.8	%			0.0				0.0	%
Consumer services			24.0				2.6	%			24.1				3.6	%
Healthcare			23.0				2.5	%			27.7				4.2	%
Logistics			20.5				2.2	%			9.9				1.5	%
Auto parts manufacturer			12.0				1.3	%			12.9				1.9	%
Radio and television			10.3				1.1	%			0.0				0.0	%
Utlities			10.0				1.1	%			2.5				0.4	%
Leisure goods			10.0				1.1	%			0.0				0.0	%
Computer hardware			9.7				1.0	%			9.9				1.5	%
IT outsourcing			6.9				0.7	%			15.0				2.2	%
Grocery			6.9				0.7	%			3.7				0.6	%
Education			6.6				0.7	%			14.9				2.2	%
Advertising			5.1				0.5	%			2.9				0.4	%
Packaging and containers			5.0				0.5	%			0.0				0.0	%
Clothing			4.6				0.5	%			0.0				0.0	%
Electronics			3.9				0.4	%			4.7				0.7	%
Insurance			3.5				0.4	%			8.0				1.2	%
Pharmaceutical			3.5				0.4	%			3.5				0.5	%
IT value-added reseller			0.5				0.1	%			0.7				0.1	%
Medical services			0.0				0.0	%			4.0				0.6	%
Shipping and transportation			0.0				0.0	%			3.4				0.5	%
Web hosting			0.0				0.0	%			36.9				5.5	%
Digital media			0.0				0.0	%			3.0				0.5	%
Total		$	931.6				100.0	%		$	667.5				100.0	%

Since our inception in 2003, our portfolio has consisted generally of senior loans to middle-market companies. We have also invested in publicly traded debt and/or equity securities or take controlling interests in portfolio companies in certain limited circumstances, as well as syndicated corporate loans and structured finance investments. On December 3, 2007, we changed our name from Technology Investment Capital Corp. to TICC Capital Corp. We expect to actively seek new investment opportunities both within and outside this sector that otherwise meet our investment criteria.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following tables present the top ten industries (based upon Moody's industry classifications) of the aggregate holdings of the CLOs included in our portfolio, based on par value, as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012.

Top Ten Industries		At December 31, 2013
Healthcare, education and childcare			10.67	%
Broadcasting and entertainment			6.28	%
Electronics			5.89	%
Telecommunications			4.98	%
Hotels, motels, inns and gaming			4.71	%
Retail stores			4.49	%
Automobile			4.21	%
Banking			4.12	%
Chemicals, plastics and rubber			4.10	%
Business equipment and services			3.67	%
Total			53.12	%

Top Ten Industries		At December 31, 2012
Healthcare, education and childcare			9.25	%
Broadcasting and entertainment			5.31	%
Electronics			4.47	%
Telecommunications			4.34	%
Diversified/conglomerate services			4.00	%
Chemicals, plastics and rubber			3.95	%
Automobile			3.43	%
Retail stores			3.33	%
Finance			3.04	%
Personal, food and miscellaneous services			2.89	%
Total			44.01	%

PORTFOLIO GRADING

We have adopted a credit grading system to monitor the quality of our debt investment portfolio. Equity securities are not graded. As of December 31, 2013 and 2012 our portfolio had a weighted average grade of 2.1 and 2.1, respectively, based upon the fair value of the debt investments in the portfolio.

At December 31, 2013 and 2012, our debt investment portfolio was graded as follows:

						December 31, 2013
Grade		Summary Description				Principal Value				Percentage of Total Portfolio				Portfolio at Fair Value				Percentage of Total Portfolio
						(dollars in millions)								(dollars in millions)
1			Company is ahead of expectations and/or outperforming financial covenant requirements and such trend is expected to continue.			$	—				0.0	%		$	—				0.0	%
2			Full repayment of principal and interest is expected				593.6				85.3	%			589.1				86.7	%
3			Closer monitoring is required. Full repayment of principal and interest is expected.				91.9				13.2	%			84.8				12.5	%
4			A reduction of interest income has occurred or is expected to occur. No loss of principal is expected.				—				0.0	%			—				0.0	%
5			A loss of some portion of principal is expected.				10.0				1.5	%			5.5				0.8	%
						$	695.5				100.0	%		$	679.4				100.0	%

TABLE OF CONTENTS

						December 31, 2012
Grade		Summary Description				Principal Value				Percentage of Total Portfolio				Portfolio at Fair Value				Percentage of Total Portfolio
						(dollars in millions)								(dollars in millions)
1			Company is ahead of expectations and/or outperforming financial covenant requirements and such trend is expected to continue.			$	—				0.0	%		$	—				0.0	%
2			Full repayment of principal and interest is expected				495.5				86.7	%			483.3				87.8	%
3			Closer monitoring is required. Full repayment of principal and interest is expected.				59.7				10.4	%			59.1				10.7	%
4			A reduction of interest income has occurred or is expected to occur. No loss of principal is expected.				6.4				1.1	%			5.5				1.0	%
5			A loss of some portion of principal is expected.				10.3				1.8	%			2.8				0.5	%
						$	571.9				100.0	%		$	550.7				100.0	%

We expect that a portion of our investments will be in the Grades 3, 4 or 5 categories from time to time, and, as such, we will be required to work with troubled portfolio companies to improve their business and protect our investment. The number and amount of investments included in Grade 3, 4 or 5 may fluctuate from year to year.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Set forth below is a comparison of our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011.

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012

Investment Income

As of December 31, 2013, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 3.94% and 15.00% and maturity dates of between 15 and 136 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 8.7%, compared with 9.4% as of December 31, 2012.

Investment income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $105.1 million compared to approximately $71.2 million for the period ended December 31, 2012. This increase was due in part to an increase in the distributions from the equity interests in our CLO vehicle investments and the amount of performing assets in the portfolio. The total principal value of income producing debt investments as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 was approximately $685.5 million and $566.5 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2013, investment income consisted of approximately $47.3 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $3.7 million in amortization of original issue and market discount, approximately $0.4 million of discount income derived from unscheduled principal cash remittances at par on discounted debt securities, approximately $47.2 million in distributions from the equity interest in securitized vehicle investments and an equity investment, as well as approximately $2.2 million in PIK interest income.

For the year ended December 31, 2013, fee income of approximately $4.3 million was recorded, compared to fee income of approximately $5.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. Fee income consists of non-recurring fees in connection with our investments in portfolio companies, including commitment fees, origination fees and amendment fees.

Operating Expenses

Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 were $49.3 million, which includes the capital gains incentive fee accrual reduction of approximately $1.2 million.

Expenses before incentive fees, for the year ended December 31, 2013, were approximately $43.9 million. This amount consisted primarily of investment advisory fees, interest expense and other debt financing expenses, professional fees, compensation expense, and general and administrative expenses.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Expenses before incentive fees increased approximately $20.9 million from the year ended December 31, 2012, attributable primarily to higher interest expense associated with the senior notes issued under our collateralized loan obligation transactions, higher investment advisory fees (consisting of the base management fee) as well as increased compensation expense and professional fees associated with our legal and audit expenses. Expenses before incentive fees for the year ended December 31, 2012 were approximately $23.0 million.

The investment advisory fee for the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $19.1 million, representing the base fee as provided for in the Investment Advisory Agreement. The investment advisory fee in the comparable period in 2012 was approximately $11.2 million. The increase of approximately $7.9 million is due to an increase in average gross assets. At each of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012, respectively, approximately $7.1 million and $4.9 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TICC Management, including the net investment income incentive fee discussed below.

Interest expense and other debt financing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $19.0 million, which was directly related to our debt securitization financing transactions and 2017 Convertible Notes issuance, compared with interest expense of approximately $7.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2012.

TICC CLO LLC

In August 2011, senior notes in the amount of $101,250,000 were issued by a newly formed special purpose vehicle in which a whole-owned subsidiary of TICC owns all of the equity. Under this structure, the notes bear interest, after the effective date, at three-month London Inter Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.25% (prior to the effective date, the Class A Notes bear interest at five-month LIBOR plus 2.25%). The accrued interest payable at December 31, 2013 was approximately $476,000. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2013, the amortization of discount on the issued notes was approximately $159,000 and the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs was approximately $303,000. At December 31, 2012, interest expense of approximately $491,000 remained payable.

TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC

On August 23, 2012, the Company completed a $160 million debt securitization financing transaction, consisting of $120 million in secured notes and $40 million of subordinated notes. On February 25, 2013 and May 28, 2013, TICC CLO 2012-1 issued additional secured notes totaling an aggregate of $120 million and subordinated notes totaling an aggregate of $40 million, which subordinated notes were purchased by the Company, under the “accordion” feature of the debt securitization which allowed, under certain circumstances and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for an increase in the amount of secured and subordinated notes. It is not necessary that the Company own all or any of the notes permitted by this feature, which may affect the accounting treatment of the debt securitization financing transaction. As of December 31, 2013 the secured notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer have an aggregate face amount of $240 million and were issued in four classes. The class A-1 notes have a current face amount of $176 million, are rated AAA(sf)/Aaa(sf) by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P) and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s), respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 1.75%. The class B-1 notes have a current face amount of $20 million, are rated AA(sf)/Aa2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. The class C-1 notes have a current face amount of $23 million, are rated A(sf)/A2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 4.75%. The class D-1 notes have a current face amount of $21 million, are rated BBB(sf)/Baa2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 5.75%. TICC presently owns all of the subordinated notes, which totaled $80 million as of December 31, 2013. For further information on this securitization, see Note 8 in the financial statements.

The aggregate accrued interest payable on the notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer at December 31, 2013 was approximately $683,000. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2013, the aggregate amortization of discount on the issued notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer was approximately $437,000 and the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs was approximately $315,000.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2017 Convertible Notes

On September 26, 2012, we issued $105.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes. An additional $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes was issued on October 22, 2012 pursuant to the exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes mature on November 1, 2017. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.50% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on May 1, 2013. The accrued interest payable on the Convertible Notes at December 31, 2013 was approximately $1.4 million. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2013, the amortization of deferred issuance costs was approximately $621,000.

The table below summarizes the components of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012:

		Year Ended December 31, 2013																Year Ended December 31, 2012
(dollars in thousands)		Stated Interest Expense(1)				Note Discount Expense(2)				Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs				Total				Stated Interest Expense(1)				Note Discount Expense(2)				Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs				Total
TICC CLO LLC Class A Notes		$	2,592.2			$	158.6			$	302.5			$	3,053.3			$	2,783.1			$	171.8			$	303.3			$	3,258.2
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 Notes			3,164.0				193.8				—				3,357.8				790.4				61.2				—				851.6
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 Notes			665.3				52.9				—				718.2				153.5				17.7				—				171.2
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 Notes			1,016.3				90.1				—				1,106.4				228.8				31.9				—				260.7
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 Notes			1,111.4				100.4				—				1,211.8				179.8				28.6				—				208.4
TICC CLO 2012-1 amortization of deferred debt issuance costs			—				—				315.2				315.2				—				—				85.8				85.8
2017 Convertible Notes			8,577.1				—				620.9				9,198.0				2,269.8				—				157.0				2,426.8
Total		$	17,126.3			$	595.8			$	1,238.6			$	18,960.7			$	6,405.4			$	311.2			$	546.1			$	7,262.7

Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and tax fees, were approximately $2.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to approximately $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012. This was the result of an increase in audit fees of approximately $443,000. This increase was partially offset by a decrease in fees related to legal services of approximately $329,000 for the period ended December 31, 2013.

Compensation expense was approximately $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to approximately $1.2 million for the period ended December 31, 2012, reflecting the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, controller, accounting staff and administrative support personnel. At December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012 respectively, approximately $24,000 and $0 of compensation expenses remained payable.

General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of printing expenses, listing fees, facilities costs and other expenses were approximately $1.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2013 compared to approximately $1.0 million for 2012. This increase was largely due to direct charges incurred by our debt

TABLE OF CONTENTS

securitization vehicles for ratings bureau charges and administrative services. Office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the Administration Agreement.

Incentive Fees

The net investment income incentive fee for the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $6.6 million compared to $5.5 million for the period ended December 31, 2012. The net investment income incentive fee is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding calendar quarter subject to a hurdle rate which is determined as of December 31 of the preceding year. For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income accrued during the calendar quarter minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base fee, expenses payable under the Administration Agreement with BDC Partners, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee).

The capital gains incentive fee expense, as reported under generally accepted accounting principles, is calculated on the basis of net realized and unrealized gains and losses at the end of each period. The expense related to the hypothetical liquidation of the portfolio (and assuming no other changes in realized or unrealized gains and losses) would only become payable to our investment adviser in the event of a complete liquidation of our portfolio as of year end. The capital gains incentive fee expense for the year ended December 31, 2013 resulted in an accrual reversal of approximately $1.2 million as a result of net unrealized depreciation partially offset by net realized gains on our portfolio for the year ended December 31, 2013. For the year ended December 31, 2012, an expense of approximately $5.5 million was recorded under the hypothetical liquidation calculation.

The amount of the capital gains incentive fee which will actually be payable is determined in accordance with the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement and is calculated as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). The terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement state that the capital gains incentive fee calculation is based on net realized gains, if any, offset by gross unrealized depreciation for the calendar year. No effect is given to gross unrealized appreciation in this calculation. For the year ended December 31, 2013, such an accrual was not required under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the amount calculated, and payable, under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement was approximately $1.6 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments

For the year ended December 31, 2013, we recorded net realized capital gains on investments of approximately $6.4 million, which represents the gain on the sale of several of our CLO debt and equity investments which totaled approximately $10.4 million partially offset by the loss associated with the write-off of our investment in Genutec Business Solutions of approximately $4.7 million.

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the year ended December 31, 2013, we had net unrealized losses of approximately $3.2 million, comprised of $36.3 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $29.6 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $9.9 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation as certain investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the year ended December 31, 2013 were as follows (in millions):

Portfolio Company		Changes in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
RBS Holding Company		$	8.2
Merrill Communications, LLC			7.8
Genutec Business Solutions			4.7
Other CLO equity related investments			3.9
Benefit Street Partners CLO II, Ltd.			3.0
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc.			2.2
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2013-2, Ltd			1.5
Band Digital, Inc.			1.3
Ares XXVI CLO Ltd.			1.1
Hewetts Island CDO IV, Ltd.			(1.1	)
Pegasus Solutions, Inc.			(1.6	)
Jersey Street CLO, Ltd.			(1.6	)
Canaras Summit CLO Ltd.			(2.0	)
ACA CLO 2006-2, Limited			(2.2	)
GSC Partners 2007-8X CDO			(2.2	)
Hewetts Island CDO III 2005-1, Ltd.			(2.2	)
Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd.			(2.2	)
Lightpoint CLO VIII, Ltd.			(3.0	)
ACA CLO 2007-1, Ltd.			(3.0	)
CS Advisors CLO I Ltd.			(3.7	)
Nextag, Inc.			(3.9	)
Stone Tower CLO VII Ltd.			(4.9	)
Net all other(1)			(3.3	)
Total		$	(3.2	)

For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded net realized capital gains on investments of approximately $16.9 million, which are largely comprised of aggregate gains from the sale of several CLO debt investments ($12.4 million) and the gain on the repayment on our investment in American Integration Technologies, LLC ($1.4 million).

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the year ended December 31, 2012, we had net unrealized gains of approximately $14.3 million, comprised of $52.4 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $24.0 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $14.1 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation as certain

TABLE OF CONTENTS

investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the year ended December 31, 2012 were as follows (in millions):

Portfolio Company		Changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
Canaras CLO Equity – 2007-1A, 1X		$	1.9
GSC Partners 2007-8X Sub CDO			1.7
Emporia CLO 2007 3A E			1.7
Hewetts Island CDO IV 2006-4 E			1.5
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc.			1.5
Jersey Street 2006-1A CLO LTD			1.3
Harbourview – 2006A CLO Equity			1.2
GALE 2007-4A CLO			1.0
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc.			1.0
Band Digital Inc.			(1.3	)
American Integration Technologies, LLC			(1.5	)
RBS Holding Company			(1.5	)
Prospero CLO II BV			(1.6	)
Pegasus Solutions, Inc.			(1.8	)
GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc.			(2.0	)
Net all other(1)			11.2
Total		$	14.3

Please see “— Portfolio Grading” for more information.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Net Investment Income

Net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2013 and 2012 was approximately $55.8 million and $37.2 million, respectively. This increase was due in part to an increase in the amount of performing assets in the portfolio and distributions from the CLO equity investments in our portfolio, as well as lower capital gains incentive fees. These were partially offset by increased interest expense as well as higher base management fees and net investment income incentive fees.

Excluding the impact of the capital gains incentive fee accrual reduction of approximately $1.2 million, core net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $54.6 million compared to approximately $42.7 million for the period ending December 31, 2012.

Based on weighted-average shares outstanding of 51,073,758 (basic) and 61,106,910 (diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share for the year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $1.09 (basic) and $1.03 (diluted), compared to approximately $0.98 per share (basic) and $0.96 (diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2012. Excluding the impact of the accrued capital gains incentive fee, the net increase in net assets resulting from core net investment income per common share would have been approximately $1.07 (basic) and approximately $1.01 (diluted), compared to $1.12 per share (basic) and $1.10 (diluted) for the period ending December 31, 2012.

Please see “— Supplemental Information Regarding Core Net Investment Income and Core Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations” below for more information.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

We had a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $58.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2013, compared to a net increase of approximately $68.3 million for the year ended

TABLE OF CONTENTS

December 31, 2012. This decrease was attributable to a large shift in net unrealized depreciation on investments and a significant decrease in net realized capital gains. These were partially offset by increased net investment income.

Based on weighted-average shares outstanding of 51,073,758 (basic) and 61,106,910 (diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share for year ended December 31, 2013 was approximately $1.15 (basic) and approximately $1.09 (diluted), compared to a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $1.80 per share (basic) and $1.73 (diluted) for the period ending December 31, 2012. Excluding the impact of the accrued capital gains incentive fee, the core net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share would have been approximately $1.13 (basic) and approximately $1.07 (diluted), compared to $1.94 per share (basic) and $1.87 (diluted) for the period ending December 31, 2012.

Please see “— Supplemental Information Regarding Core Net Investment Income and Core Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations” below for more information.

Supplemental Information Regarding Core Net Investment Income and Core Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

On a supplemental basis, we provide information relating to core net investment income, its ratio to net assets, and core net increase in net assets resulting from operations, which are non-GAAP measures. These measures are provided in addition to, but not as a substitute for, net investment income and net increase in net assets resulting from operations. Our non-GAAP measures may differ from similar measures by other companies, even if similar terms are used to identify such measures. Core net investment income represents net investment income excluding our capital gains incentive fee. Core net increase in net assets resulting from operations represents net increase in net assets resulting from operations excluding the capital gains incentive fee. As the capital gains incentive fee, for generally accepted accounting purposes, is based on the hypothetical liquidation of the entire portfolio (and as any capital gains incentive fee may be non-recurring), we believe that core net investment income and core net increase in net assets resulting from operations are useful indicators of performance during this period. Further, as the capital gains incentive fee may not be fully currently tax deductible and as the RIC requirements are to distribute taxable earnings, the core net investment income provides a better indication of estimated taxable income for the year to date.

The following table provides a reconciliation of net investment income to core net investment income (for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012):

		Year Ended December 31, 2013								Year Ended December 31, 2012
		Amount				Per Share Amounts (basic)				Amount				Per Share Amounts (basic)
Net investment income		$	55,792,632			$	1.09			$	37,177,354			$	0.979
Capital gains incentive fee			(1,192,382	)			(0.02	)			5,509,061				0.145
Core net investment income		$	54,600,250			$	1.07			$	42,686,415			$	1.124

The following table provides a reconciliation of net increase in net assets resulting from operations to core net increase in net assets resulting from operations (for the years ended December 31, 2013 and 2012):

		Year Ended December 31, 2013								Year Ended December 31, 2012
		Amount				Per Share Amounts (basic)				Amount				Per Share Amounts (basic)
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations		$	58,944,734			$	1.15			$	68,323,188			$	1.799
Capital gains incentive fee			(1,192,382	)			(0.02	)			5,509,061				0.145
Core net increase in net assets resulting from operations		$	57,752,352			$	1.13			$	73,832,249			$	1.944

TABLE OF CONTENTS

In addition, the following ratio is presented to supplement the financial highlights included in Note 10 to the consolidated financial statements:

		Year Ended December 31, 2013				Year Ended December 31, 2012				Year Ended December 31, 2011				Year Ended December 31, 2010				Year Ended December 31, 2009
Ratio of core net investment income to average net assets, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively			10.79	%			11.74	%			9.77	%			9.95	%			6.54	%

The following table provides a reconciliation of the ratio of net investment income to average net assets to the ratio of core net investment income to average net assets, for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012, 2011, 2010 and 2009, respectively.

		Year Ended December 31, 2013				Year Ended December 31, 2012				Year Ended December 31, 2011				Year Ended December 31, 2010				Year Ended December 31, 2009
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets			11.02	%			10.23	%			9.42	%			9.95	%			6.54	%
Ratio of capital gain incentive fee to average net assets			(0.23	)%			1.51	%			0.35	%			0.00	%			0.00	%
Ratio of core net investment income to average net assets			10.79	%			11.74	%			9.77	%			9.95	%			6.54	%

Comparison of the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011

Investment Income

As of December 31, 2012, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 4.00% and 16.00% (excluding our investment in GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc. which carries a zero interest rate through October 30, 2014) and maturity dates of between 2 and 141 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 9.4%, including GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc., compared with 11.3% as of December 31, 2011.

Investment income for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $71.2 million compared to approximately $45.2 million for the period ended December 31, 2011. This increase was due in part to an increase in the distributions from the equity interests in our CLO vehicle investments and the amount of performing assets in the portfolio as well as a one-time fee of approximately $3.4 million associated with our investment in American Integration Technologies, LLC. The total principal value of income producing debt investments as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 was approximately $566.5 million and $382.3 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2012, investment income consisted of approximately $32.2 million in cash interest from portfolio investments, approximately $5.8 million in amortization of original issue and market discount, approximately $0.6 million of discount income derived from unscheduled principal cash remittances at par on discounted debt securities, approximately $25.8 million in distributions from the equity interest in securitized vehicle investments and an equity investment, as well as approximately $1.6 million in PIK interest income.

For the year ended December 31, 2012, fee income of approximately $5.2 million was recorded, compared to fee income of approximately $921,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Fee income consists of non-recurring fees in connection with our investments in portfolio companies, including commitment fees, origination fees and amendment fees. During the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded approximately $3.4 million of PIK fee income in association with the exit of our investment in American Integration Technologies, LLC.

Operating Expenses

Total expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 were $34.0 million, which includes the accrued capital gains incentive fee of approximately $5.5 million.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Expenses before incentive fees, for the year ended December 31, 2012, were approximately $23.0 million. This amount consisted of investment advisory fees, interest expense and other debt financing expenses, professional fees, compensation expense, and general and administrative expenses. Expenses before incentive fees increased approximately $11.2 million from the year ended December 31, 2011, attributable primarily to higher interest expense associated with the senior notes issued under our collateralized loan obligation transactions, higher investment advisory fees (consisting of the base management fee) as well as increased professional fees associated with our legal and audit expenses. Expenses before incentive fees for the year ended December 31, 2011 were approximately $11.8 million.

The investment advisory fee for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $11.2 million, representing the base fee as provided for in the Investment Advisory Agreement. The investment advisory fee in the comparable period in 2011 was approximately $7.3 million. The increase of approximately $3.9 million is due to an increase in average gross assets. At each of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, approximately $4.9 million and $2.9 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TICC Management, including the net investment income incentive fee discussed below.

Interest expense and other debt financing expenses for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $7.3 million, which was directly related to our debt securitization financing transactions and 2017 Convertible Notes issuance, compared with interest expense of approximately $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011.

TICC CLO LLC

In August 2011, senior notes in the amount of $101,250,000 were issued by a newly formed special purpose vehicle in which a whole-owned subsidiary of TICC owns all of the equity. Under this structure, the notes bear interest, after the effective date, at three-month London Inter Bank Offered Rate (“LIBOR”) plus 2.25% (prior to the effective date, the Class A Notes bear interest at five-month LIBOR plus 2.25%). The accrued interest payable at December 31, 2012 was approximately $491,000. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2012, the amortization of discount on the issued notes was approximately $172,000 and the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs was approximately $303,000. At December 31, 2011, interest expense of approximately $1.1 million remained payable.

TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC

On August 23, 2012, the Company completed a $160 million debt securitization financing transaction. The secured and subordinated notes offered in the debt securitization were issued by TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC (“2012 Securitization Issuer” or “TICC CLO 2012-1”), a newly formed special purpose vehicle that is a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company. The secured notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer have an aggregate face amount of $120 million and were issued in four classes. The class A-1 notes have an initial face amount of $88 million, are rated AAA(sf) /Aaa(sf) by Standard & Poor’s Ratings Services (S&P) and Moody’s Investors Service, Inc. (Moody’s), respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 1.75%. The class B-1 notes have an initial face amount of $10 million, are rated AA(sf)/Aa2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. The class C-1 notes have an initial face amount of $11.5 million, are rated A(sf)/A2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 4.75%. The class D-1 notes have an initial face amount of $10.5 million, are rated BBB(sf)/Baa2(sf) by S&P and Moody’s, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 5.75%. The LIBOR rate which is the basis of the total interest rate on the secured notes that were issued by the 2012 Securitization Issuer was measured on a six-month basis until February 2013. TICC presently owns all of the subordinated notes, which totaled $40 million as of December 31, 2012. On February 25, 2013, the special purpose vehicle issued additional secured notes of $60 million and subordinated notes of $20 million under the “accordion” feature. For further information on this securitization, see Note 8 in the financial statements.

The aggregate accrued interest payable on the notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer at December 31, 2012 was approximately $1.4 million. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2012, the aggregate amortization of discount on the issued notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer was approximately $139,000 and the amortization of deferred debt issuance costs was approximately $86,000.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

2017 Convertible Notes

On September 26, 2012, we issued $105.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes. An additional $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes was issued on October 22, 2012 pursuant to the exercise of the initial purchasers’ option to purchase additional Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes mature on November 1, 2017. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.50% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on May 1, 2013. The accrued interest payable on the Convertible Notes at December 31, 2012 was approximately $2.3 million. Additionally, for the year ended December 31, 2012, the amortization of deferred issuance costs was approximately $157,000.

The table below summarizes the components of interest expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011:

		Year Ended December 31, 2012																Year Ended December 31, 2011
(dollars in thousands)		Stated Interest Expense(1)				Note Discount Expense(2)				Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs				Total				Stated Interest Expense(1)				Note Discount Expense(2)				Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs				Total
TICC CLO LLC Class A Notes		$	2,783.1			$	171.8			$	303.3			$	3,258.2			$	1,076.1			$	49.0			$	118.5			$	1,243.6
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 Notes			790.4				61.2				—				851.6				—				—				—				—
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 Notes			153.5				17.7				—				171.2				—				—				—				—
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 Notes			228.8				31.9				—				260.7				—				—				—				—
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 Notes			179.8				28.6				—				208.4				—				—				—				—
TICC CLO 2012-1 amortization of deferred debt issuance costs			—				—				85.8				85.8				—				—				—				—
2017 Convertible Notes			2,269.8				—				157.0				2,426.8				—				—				—				—
Total		$	6,405.4			$	311.2			$	546.1			$	7,262.7			$	1,076.1			$	49.0			$	118.5			$	1,243.6

Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and tax fees, were approximately $1.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to approximately $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This was the result of an increase in audit fees of approximately $577,000 and legal services of approximately $216,000 incurred during the twelve months ended December 31, 2012. These increases were partially offset by a decrease in fees related to valuation services of approximately $87,000 for the period ended December 31, 2012.

Compensation expenses were approximately $1.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to approximately $1.1 million for the period ended December 31, 2011, reflecting the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, controller,

TABLE OF CONTENTS

accounting staff and administrative support personnel. At December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, approximately $0 and $605,000 of compensation expenses remained payable.

General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of printing expenses, listing fees, facilities costs and other expenses were approximately $1.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to approximately $587,000 for the same period in 2011. This increase was largely due to direct charges incurred by our debt securitization vehicles for rating bureau and administrative services. Office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the Administration Agreement.

Incentive Fees

The net investment income incentive fee for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $5.5 million compared to $2.2 million for the period ended December 31, 2011. The net investment income incentive fee is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” for the immediately preceding calendar quarter subject to a hurdle rate which is determined as of December 31 of the preceding year. For this purpose, “Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income” means interest income, dividend income and any other income accrued during the calendar quarter minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base fee, expenses payable under the Administration Agreement with BDC Partners, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee).

The capital gains incentive fee expense for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $5.5 million. The capital gains incentive fee expense, as reported under generally accepted accounting principles, is calculated on the basis of net realized and unrealized gains and losses at the end of each period. The expense related to the hypothetical liquidation of the portfolio (and assuming no other changes in realized or unrealized gains and losses) would only become payable to our investment adviser in the event of a complete liquidation of our portfolio as of period end and the termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement on such date. For the year ended December 31, 2011, an expense of approximately $1.1 million was recorded under the hypothetical liquidation calculation.

The amount of the capital gains incentive fee which will actually be payable is determined in accordance with the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement and is calculated as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). The terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement state that the capital gains incentive fee calculation is based on net realized gains, if any, offset by gross unrealized depreciation for the calendar year. No effect is given to gross unrealized appreciation in this calculation. For the year ended December 31, 2012, the amount calculated, and payable, under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement was approximately $1.6 million. For the year ended December 31, 2011, such an accrual was not required under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement.

Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments

For the year ended December 31, 2012, we recorded net realized capital gains on investments of approximately $16.9 million, which are largely comprised of aggregate gains from the sale of several CLO debt investments ($12.4 million) and the gain on the repayment on our investment in American Integration Technologies, LLC ($1.4 million).

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the year ended December 31, 2012, we had net unrealized gains of approximately $14.3 million, comprised of $52.4 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $24.0 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $14.1 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation as certain investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the year ended December 31, 2012 were as follows (in millions):

Portfolio Company		Changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation)
Canaras CLO Equity – 2007-1A, 1X		$	1.9
GSC Partners 2007-8X Sub CDO			1.7
Emporia CLO 2007 3A E			1.7
Hewetts Island CDO IV 2006-4 E			1.5
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc.			1.5
Jersey Street 2006-1A CLO LTD			1.3
Harbourview – 2006A CLO Equity			1.2
GALE 2007-4A CLO			1.0
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc.			1.0
Band Digital Inc.			(1.3	)
American Integration Technologies, LLC			(1.5	)
RBS Holding Company			(1.5	)
Prospero CLO II BV			(1.6	)
Pegasus Solutions, Inc.			(1.8	)
GenuTec Business Solutions, Inc.			(2.0	)
Net all other(1)			11.2
Total		$	14.3

For the year ended December 31, 2011, we recorded net realized gains on investments of approximately $3.6 million, which largely represents relatively small gains on several different investments including the realized gains on the repayment on our investment in Prodigy Health Group ($0.7 million) and the sale of our investments in Hudson Straits CLO 2004-1AE ($0.5 million) and Del Mar CLO I Ltd. 2006-1 ($0.4 million).

Based upon the fair value determinations made in good faith by the Board of Directors, during the year ended December 31, 2011, we had net unrealized losses of approximately $19.4 million, comprised of $23.3 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $39.9 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $2.8 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation as certain investments were realized. The most significant changes in net unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the year ended December 31, 2011 were as follows (in millions):

Portfolio Company		Changes in Unrealized Appreciation (Depreciation)
Emporia CLO 2007 3A E		$	(1.0	)
Hewetts Island CDO IV 2006-4			(1.4	)
Integra Telecomm, Inc.			(2.1	)
Lightpoint CLO 2007-8a			(1.0	)
RBS Holding Company			(1.0	)
SourceHov, LLC			(1.1	)
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. common stock			(1.5	)
Net all other(1)			(10.3	)
Total		$	(19.4	)

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Please see “— Portfolio Grading” for more information.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Net Investment Income

Net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 was approximately $37.2 million and $30.0 million, respectively. This increase was due in part to an increase in the amount of performing assets in the portfolio and distributions from the CLO equity investments in our portfolio, as well as the non-recurrence of a one-time fee of approximately $3.4 million associated with our investment in American Integration Technologies, LLC.

Excluding the impact of the capital gains incentive fee of approximately $5.5 million, core net investment income for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $42.7 million compared to approximately $31.1 million for the period ending December 31, 2011.

Based on weighted-average shares outstanding of 37,978,693 (basic) and 40,575,776 (diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share for the year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $0.98 (basic) and $0.96 (diluted), compared to approximately $0.92 per share (basic and diluted) for the year ended December 31, 2011. Excluding the impact of the accrued capital gains incentive fee, the net increase in net assets resulting from core net investment income per common share would have been approximately $1.12 (basic) and approximately $1.10 (diluted), compared to $0.96 per share (basic and diluted) for the period ending December 31, 2011.

Please see “— Supplemental Information Regarding Core Net Investment Income and Core Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations” below for more information.

Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations

We had a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $68.3 million for the year ended December 31 2012, compared to a net increase of approximately $14.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. This increase was attributable to greater net investment income, a large shift in net unrealized appreciation on investments and a significant increase in net realized capital gains.

Based on weighted-average shares outstanding of 37,978,693 (basic) and 40,575,776 (diluted), the net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share for year ended December 31, 2012 was approximately $1.80 (basic) and approximately $1.73 (diluted), compared to a net increase in net assets resulting from operations of approximately $0.44 per share (basic and diluted) for the period ending December 31, 2011. Excluding the impact of the accrued capital gains incentive fee, the core net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share would have been approximately $1.94 (basic) and approximately $1.87 (diluted), compared to an increase of $0.47 per share (basic and diluted) for the period ending December 31, 2011.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

During the year ended December 31, 2013, we issued approximately 11.7 million shares in two equity offerings and in connection with an “at-the-market” share issuance plan.

During the year ended December 31, 2013, cash and cash equivalents decreased from approximately $51.4 million at the beginning of the period to approximately $14.9 million at the end of the period. Net cash used by operating activities for the period, consisting primarily of the items described in “— Results of Operations,” was approximately $201.6 million, largely reflecting purchases of new investments of approximately $570.5 million partially offset by proceeds from principal repayments and sales of investments of approximately $324.0 million. Net cash used by investing activities reflects the change in restricted cash in the debt securitization entity. During the period, net cash provided by financing activities was approximately $176.4 million, reflecting primarily the net proceeds of approximately $118.7 million from the February 11, 2013 and May 28, 2013 sale of an aggregate $120.0 million of incremental secured debt in connection with the collateralized loan obligation transaction that originally closed on August 23, 2012, and $115.9 million resulting from two equity offerings and participation in an “at-the-market” share issuance plan, partially offset by the distribution of dividends.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Equity Follow-On Offerings

On February 11, 2013, we completed a public offering of 6,325,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $10.36 per share for total gross proceeds of approximately $65.5 million.

On March 22, 2013, we completed a public offering of 3,450,000 shares of our common stock at a public offering price of $10.20 per share for total gross proceeds of approximately $35.2 million.

“At-the-Market” Share Issuance Plan

During the first and third quarters of 2013, we sold 1,312,828 and 604,345 shares, respectively, of our common stock pursuant to an “at-the-market” share issuance plan. Barclays Capital Inc. acted as the sales agent. The total amount of capital raised under these issuances was approximately $13.7 million and $6.0 million, respectively, and net proceeds were approximately $13.5 million and $5.9 million, respectively, after deducting sales agent’s commissions. We have used, and will continue to use, the net proceeds from these offerings for investing in debt or equity securities, and other general corporate purposes.

Contractual Obligations

We have certain obligations with respect to the investment advisory and administration services we receive. See “— Overview.” We incurred approximately $19.1 million for investment advisory services, excluding pre-incentive net investment income incentive fees and approximately $2.2 million for administrative services for the period ending December 31, 2013.

A summary of our significant contractual payment obligations is as follows as of December 31, 2013. See Note 8 to the financial statements, “Borrowings.”

Contractual obligations		Total				Payments Due by Period
						Less than 1 year				1 – 3 years				3 – 5 years				More than 5 years
Long-term debt obligations:
TICC CLO LLC		$	101,250,000			$	—			$	—			$	—			$	101,250,000
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC			240,000,000				—				—				—				240,000,000
TICC Convertible Notes			115,000,000				—				—				115,000,000				—
Total		$	456,250,000			$	—			$	—			$	115,000,000			$	341,250,000

TICC CLO is obligated to repay the notes issued in connection with the debt securitization financing that we completed in August 2011. The notes of the 2011 Securitization Issuer mature in 2021, in the total amount of $101,250,000. There are no amortization payments due on the notes of the 2011 Securitization Issuer prior to maturity. See “Borrowings” below.

TICC CLO 2012-1 is obligated to repay the notes issued in connection with the debt securitization financing that we completed in August 2012. The notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer mature in 2023, in the total amount of $240,000,000. There are no amortization payments due on the notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer prior to maturity. See “Borrowings” below.

TICC is obligated to repay the Convertible Notes, which mature in 2017, in the total amount of $115,000,000, unless previously converted in accordance with their terms.

Share Repurchase Program

On July 30, 2009, the Board of Directors authorized a share repurchase program which provides for the purchase of up to $10 million worth of shares to be implemented at the discretion of our management team. Under the repurchase program, we may, but are not obligated to, repurchase our outstanding common stock in the open market from time to time. The timing and number of shares to be repurchased in the open market will depend on a number of factors, including market conditions and alternative investment opportunities. In addition, any repurchases will be conducted in accordance with the 1940 Act.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements, including any risk management of commodity pricing or other hedging practices.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Borrowings

In accordance with the 1940 Act, with certain limited exceptions, we are only allowed to borrow amounts such that our asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% after such borrowing. As of December 31, 2013, our asset coverage for borrowed amounts was 214%.

The following are the Company’s outstanding principal amounts, carrying values and fair values of the Company’s notes payable as of December 31, 2013 and December 31, 2012. Fair values of our notes payable are based upon the bid price provided by the placement agent at the measurement date, if available:

		As of
		December 31, 2013												December 31, 2012
($ in thousands)		Principal Amount				Carrying Value				Fair Value				Principal Amount				Carrying Value				Fair Value
TICC CLO LLC 2021 Notes		$	101,250			$	100,041	(1)		$	100,617			$	101,250			$	99,883	(1)		$	101,250
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 2023 Notes(2)			176,000				174,072	(1)			173,061				88,000				86,149	(1)			87,780
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 2023 Notes(2)			20,000				19,471	(1)			19,950				10,000				9,455	(1)			9,875
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 2023 Notes(2)			23,000				22,105	(1)			23,058				11,500				10,501	(1)			11,155
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 2023 Notes(2)			21,000				19,987	(1)			21,000				10,500				9,347	(1)			10,382
Sub-total TICC CLO 2012-1, LLC			240,000				235,635				237,069				120,000				115,452				119,192
2017 Convertible Notes			115,000				115,000				124,631				115,000				115,000				113,131
		$	456,250			$	450,676			$	462,317			$	336,250			$	330,335			$	333,573

The weighted average stated interest rate and weighted average maturity on all our debt outstanding as of December 31, 2013 were 3.90% and 7.7 years, respectively, and as of December 31, 2012 were 4.50% and 8.1 years, respectively.

Debt Securitization

Notes Payable-TICC CLO LLC

On August 10, 2011, we completed a $225.0 million debt securitization financing transaction. The Class A Notes and the subordinated notes offered in the debt securitization were issued by TICC CLO LLC (“2011 Securitization Issuer” or “TICC CLO”), a subsidiary of TICC Capital Corp. 2011-1 Holdings, LLC (“Holdings”), which is in turn a direct subsidiary of TICC. The Class A Notes are secured by the assets held by the 2011 Securitization Issuer. The securitization was executed through a private placement of $101.25 million of secured notes rated AAA/Aaa by Standard & Poor’s Rating Service (“S&P”) and Moody’s

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Investors Service Inc. (“Moody’s”), respectively, and bearing interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.25%. Holdings retained all of the subordinated notes, which totaled $123.75 million (the “2011 Subordinated Notes”), and retained all the membership interests in the 2011 Securitization Issuer. The notes were sold at a discount to par, and the amount of the discount is being amortized over the term of the notes. The Class A Notes are included in the December 31, 2013 consolidated statements of assets and liabilities. For the year ended December 31, 2013, the Class A note holders were paid interest on the Class A notes of approximately $2.6 million. The 2011 Subordinated Notes do not bear interest, but are entitled to the residual economic interest in the 2011 Securitization Issuer.

During a period of up to three years from the closing date, all principal collections received on the underlying collateral may be used by the 2011 Securitization Issuer to purchase new collateral under our direction in our capacity as collateral manager of the 2011 Securitization Issuer and in accordance with our investment strategy, allowing us to maintain the initial leverage in the securitization for such three-year period. The Class A Notes are scheduled to mature on July 25, 2021.

The proceeds of the private placement of the Class A Notes, net of discount and debt issuance costs, were used for investment purposes. As part of the securitization, we entered into a master loan sale agreement with Holdings and the 2011 Securitization Issuer under which we agreed to sell or contribute certain senior secured and second lien loans (or participation interests therein) to Holdings, and Holdings agreed to sell or contribute such loans (or participation interests therein) to the 2011 Securitization Issuer and to purchase or otherwise acquire subordinated notes issued by the 2011 Securitization Issuer. The Class A Notes are the secured obligations of the 2011 Securitization Issuer, and an indenture governing the Notes includes customary covenants and events of default.

We serve as collateral manager to the 2011 Securitization Issuer under a collateral management agreement. We are entitled to a deferred fee for our services as collateral manager. The deferred fee is eliminated in consolidation.

As of December 31, 2013, there were 44 investments in portfolio companies with a total fair value of approximately $225.9 million, securing the Class A Notes. The pool of loans in the securitization must meet certain requirements, including asset mix and concentration, collateral coverage, term, agency rating, minimum coupon, minimum spread and sector diversity requirements.

Effective January 1, 2013 and through January 24, 2013, the interest rate of 2.57% charged under the securitization was based on three-month LIBOR of 0.32%. Effective January 25, 2013 and through April 24, 2013, the interest rate of 2.55% charged under the securitization was based on three-month LIBOR of 0.30%. Effective April 25, 2013 and through July 24, 2013, the interest rate of 2.53% charged under the securitization was based on three-month LIBOR of 0.28%. Effective July 25, 2013 and through October 24, 2013, the interest rate of 2.52% charged under the securitization was based on the three-month LIBOR of 0.27%. Effective October 25, 2013 and as of December 31, 2013, the interest rate of 2.49% charged under the securitization was based on the three-month LIBOR of 0.24%.

Deferred debt issuance costs represent fees and other direct incremental costs incurred in connection with our debt securitization. As of December 31, 2013, we had a deferred debt issuance balance of approximately $2.3 million. Discount on the notes of the 2011 Securitization Issuer at the time of issuance totaled approximately $1.6 million. These amounts are being amortized and included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the term of the debt securitization.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The following table sets forth the components of interest expense, effective annualized average interest rates and cash paid for interest for the years ended December 31, 2013, 2012 and 2011, respectively:

TICC CLO LLC		Year Ended December 31, 2013				Year Ended December 31, 2012				Year Ended December 31, 2011
Stated interest expense		$	2,592,158			$	2,783,113			$	1,076,113
Amortization of deferred issuance costs			302,517				303,345				118,520
Note discount expense			158,599				171,802				48,951
Total interest expense		$	3,053,274			$	3,258,260			$	1,243,584
Effective annualized average interest rate			3.02	%			3.21	%			3.12	%
Cash paid for interest		$	2,606,865			$	3,368,622			$	—