Oxford Square Capital Corp. - Quarter Report: 2015 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
(Mark One) | ||
x | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
FOR THE QUARTERLY PERIOD ENDED September 30, 2015
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
COMMISSION FILE NUMBER: 0-50398
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
MARYLAND | 20-0188736 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
8 SOUND SHORE DRIVE, SUITE 255
GREENWICH, CONNECTICUT 06830
(Address of principal executive office)
(203) 983-5275
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of large accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer x | |
Non-accelerated filer o | Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).Yes o No x
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date. The number of shares of the issuers common stock, $0.01 par value, outstanding as of November 6, 2015 was 59,987,986.
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
i
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF ASSETS AND LIABILITIES
(unaudited)
September 30, 2015 |
December 31, 2014 |
|||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Non-affiliated/non-control investments (cost: $970,201,027 @ 9/30/15; $999,433,538 @ 12/31/14) |
$ | 908,962,186 | $ | 967,612,035 | ||||
Affiliated investments (cost: $7,367,738 @ 9/30/15; $4,268,722 @ 12/31/14) | 5,314,226 | 1,585,303 | ||||||
Control investments (cost: $16,750,000 @ 9/30/15; $16,800,000 @ 12/31/14) | 12,904,375 | 14,960,000 | ||||||
Total investments at fair value (cost: $994,318,765 @ 9/30/15; $1,020,502,260 @ 12/31/14) |
927,180,787 | 984,157,338 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 21,216,120 | 20,505,323 | ||||||
Restricted cash | 18,637,328 | 20,576,250 | ||||||
Deferred debt issuance costs | 4,601,098 | 5,669,747 | ||||||
Interest and distributions receivable | 12,597,507 | 11,442,289 | ||||||
Securities sold not settled | 10,242 | | ||||||
Other assets | 308,726 | 290,245 | ||||||
Total assets | $ | 984,551,808 | $ | 1,042,641,192 | ||||
LIABILITIES |
||||||||
Accrued interest payable | $ | 4,964,485 | $ | 2,596,564 | ||||
Investment advisory fee and net investment income incentive fee payable to affiliate | 5,830,902 | 6,183,486 | ||||||
Securities purchased not settled | 2,850,000 | 11,343,179 | ||||||
Credit facility | 150,000,000 | 150,000,000 | ||||||
Accrued expenses | 940,623 | 629,127 | ||||||
Notes payable TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC, net of discount | 236,407,052 | 236,075,775 | ||||||
Convertible senior notes payable | 115,000,000 | 115,000,000 | ||||||
Total liabilities | 515,993,062 | 521,828,131 | ||||||
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Note 14) |
||||||||
NET ASSETS |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.01 par value, 100,000,000 share authorized; 59,987,986 and 60,303,769 shares issued and outstanding, respectively | 599,880 | 603,038 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value | 620,635,767 | 623,018,818 | ||||||
Net unrealized depreciation on investments | (67,137,978 | ) | (36,344,922 | ) | ||||
Accumulated net realized losses on investments | (65,368,395 | ) | (63,212,472 | ) | ||||
Distributions in excess of investment income | (20,170,528 | ) | (3,251,401 | ) | ||||
Total net assets | 468,558,746 | 520,813,061 | ||||||
Total liabilities and net assets | $ | 984,551,808 | $ | 1,042,641,192 | ||||
Net asset value per common share | $ | 7.81 | $ | 8.64 |
See Accompanying Notes.
1
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
COMPANY/INVESTMENT(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes |
||||||||||||||||||||
ABB/Con Cise Optical Group | retail | |||||||||||||||||||
tranche B term loan, PRIME + 2.50% due February 06, 2019(4)(5)(6)(10)(15) |
$ | 6,500,000 | $ | 6,479,139 | $ | 6,462,105 | ||||||||||||||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared) | software | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.00% (9.84% all-in floor) due September 11, 2016(4)(5)(6)(16) | 13,750,000 | 13,750,000 | 12,904,375 | |||||||||||||||||
Albertsons LLC | grocery | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.00% floor) due August 25, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) | 16,875,508 | 16,902,889 | 16,865,045 | |||||||||||||||||
AmeriLife Group | diversified insurance | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.75% (1.00% floor) due July 10, 2022(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 17,955,000 | 17,777,846 | 17,887,669 | |||||||||||||||||
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC | pharmaceuticals | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due November 01, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | 8,902,880 | 8,889,607 | 8,880,623 | |||||||||||||||||
Aricent Technologies, Inc. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.00% floor) due April 14, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(14)(17) | 14,811,381 | 14,770,775 | 14,686,373 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.50% (1.00% floor) due April 14, 2022(4)(5)(10)(14)(17) | 14,000,000 | 14,003,932 | 13,851,320 | |||||||||||||||||
Ascensus, Inc. | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due December 02, 2019(4)(5)(6)(10)(15) | 8,888,028 | 8,898,364 | 8,865,808 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.00% (1.00% floor) due December 2, 2020(4)(5)(9)(15) | 2,000,000 | 1,976,665 | 1,992,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Birch Communications, Inc. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.75% (1.00% floor) due July 18, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | 18,544,444 | 18,276,663 | 18,498,083 | |||||||||||||||||
BMC Software Finance, Inc. | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due September 10, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(15) | 4,738,889 | 4,752,477 | 4,295,803 | |||||||||||||||||
Capstone Logistics Acquisition, Inc. | logistics | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.00% floor) due October 7, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) | 18,882,437 | 18,887,469 | 18,764,422 | |||||||||||||||||
ConvergeOne Holdings Corp. | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.00% floor) due June 17, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | 17,789,924 | 17,730,793 | 17,612,025 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.00% (1.00% floor) due June 17, 2021(4)(5)(10)(15) | 3,000,000 | 2,973,849 | 2,970,000 | |||||||||||||||||
CRCI Holdings, Inc. (a/k/a CLEAResult) | utilities | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due July 10, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) | 9,822,500 | 9,795,727 | 9,760,225 | |||||||||||||||||
incremental first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.25% (1.00% floor) due July 10, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) |
6,483,689 | 6,467,967 | 6,451,271 | |||||||||||||||||
Crowne Group, LLC | auto parts manufacturer | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.00% floor) due September 30, 2020(4)(6)(10)(15) | 5,683,195 | 5,683,195 | 5,640,571 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
2
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
COMPANY/INVESTMENT(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
CT Technologies Intermediate Holdings, Inc. (a/k/a Healthport) |
healthcare | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.25%, (1.00% floor) due December 01, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) | $ | 13,421,363 | $ | 13,372,388 | $ | 13,359,893 | ||||||||||||||
Edmentum, Inc. (f/k/a Plato, Inc.) | education | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.00% floor) Cash, 2.00% PIK due June 10, 2019(3)(4)(5)(6)(9)(10) |
6,020,503 | 5,981,924 | 4,234,400 | |||||||||||||||||
First American Payment Systems | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.25% floor) due October 12, 2018(4)(5)(6)(10)(15) | 3,035,078 | 3,042,700 | 3,013,590 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 9.50% (1.25% floor) due April 12, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | 13,982,241 | 13,800,767 | 13,842,419 | |||||||||||||||||
First Data Corporation | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% due March 24, 2021(4)(5)(9)(10)(17) | 16,050,721 | 16,011,632 | 16,010,594 | |||||||||||||||||
Global Healthcare Exchange | healthcare | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.00% floor) due August 13, 2022(4)(5)(9)(10)(15) | 19,000,000 | 18,983,820 | 19,047,500 | |||||||||||||||||
GlobalLogic Holdings Inc. | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.25% (1.00% floor) due June 02, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | 17,193,750 | 17,134,105 | 17,107,781 | |||||||||||||||||
Global Tel Link Corp | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.75% (1.25% floor) due May 23, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(15) | 6,031,345 | 6,007,356 | 5,896,725 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 7.75% (1.25% floor) due November 23, 2020(4)(5)(10)(15) | 13,000,000 | 12,879,264 | 12,285,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc. | software | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50 (1.00% floor) due June 28, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(14)(17) | 14,700,000 | 14,588,359 | 14,700,000 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes LIBOR + 8.50% (1.00% floor) due June 28, 2020(4)(5)(14)(17) | 15,000,000 | 14,826,782 | 15,000,000 | |||||||||||||||||
iEnergizer Limited | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.00% (1.25% floor) due May 01, 2019(4)(5)(6)(10)(11)(12)(17) | 5,694,081 | 5,600,002 | 5,124,673 | |||||||||||||||||
Immucor, Inc. | healthcare | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured term B notes, LIBOR + 3.75% (1.25% floor) due August 19, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(15) | 4,321,711 | 4,237,960 | 4,285,236 | |||||||||||||||||
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.25% floor) due August 14, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(14)(15) | 11,258,596 | 11,220,451 | 11,181,249 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.50%, (1.25% floor) due February 14, 2021(4)(5)(9)(10)(14)(15) | 10,806,404 | 10,871,433 | 10,729,895 | |||||||||||||||||
Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, Inc. | consumer services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 7.00% (1.50% floor) due July 30, 2020(4)(5)(9)(10)(15) | 18,000,000 | 17,676,840 | 17,640,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Merrill Communications, LLC | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.75% (1.00% floor) due June 01, 2022(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(14)(15) | 23,856,471 | 23,569,958 | 23,677,547 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
3
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
COMPANY/INVESTMENT(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
NAB Holdings, LLC | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.75% (1.00% floor) due May 21, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | $ | 17,780,000 | $ | 17,662,039 | $ | 17,691,100 | ||||||||||||||
Novetta, LLC | aerospace and defense | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.00% floor) due October 2, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) | 12,622,500 | 12,526,428 | 12,559,388 | |||||||||||||||||
Novitex Enterprise Solutions (f/k/a Pitney Bowes Management Services, Inc.) | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.25% (1.25% floor) due July 07, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 15,661,650 | 15,576,944 | 14,721,951 | |||||||||||||||||
PGX Holdings | consumer services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.75% (1.00% floor) due September 29,2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 14,835,714 | 14,807,219 | 14,829,483 | |||||||||||||||||
Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. | retail | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.00% (1.00% floor) due November 24, 2017(4)(5)(6)(9)(15) | 5,937,662 | 5,905,818 | 5,927,034 | |||||||||||||||||
Petsmart, Inc. | retail | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due March 11, 2022(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | 5,985,000 | 6,008,065 | 5,969,439 | |||||||||||||||||
ProQuest LLC | education | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.25% (1.00% floor) due October 24, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(17) | 5,954,927 | 5,988,340 | 5,944,982 | |||||||||||||||||
RBS Holding Company | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, PRIME + 7.00% due March 23, 2016(3)(4)(5)(6) | 22,759,516 | 15,491,384 | 18,913,158 | |||||||||||||||||
Recorded Books, Inc. (f/k/a Volume Holdings, Inc.) | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.00% floor) due July 31, 2021(4)(5)(10)(15) | 9,000,000 | 8,955,478 | 8,955,000 | |||||||||||||||||
SCS Holdings I Inc. (Sirius Computer Solutions, Inc.) | electronics | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.75% (1.25% floor) due December 07, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) | 8,009,615 | 8,025,776 | 8,009,615 | |||||||||||||||||
Securus Technologies, Inc. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.50% (1.25% floor) due April 30, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(15) | 5,899,812 | 5,858,793 | 5,698,864 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 7.75% (1.25% floor) due April 30, 2021(4)(5)(10)(15) | 6,400,000 | 6,375,238 | 5,752,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Sesac Holdco II LLC | radio and television | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due February 08, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17)(18) | 14,023,105 | 14,034,750 | 13,988,047 | |||||||||||||||||
Serena Software Inc. | enterprise software | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.50% (1.00% floor) due April 14, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) | 18,691,246 | 18,376,270 | 18,613,304 | |||||||||||||||||
Source Hov, LLC | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.75% (1.00% floor) due October 31, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(14)(17) | 17,662,500 | 17,202,191 | 15,918,328 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 10.50% (1.00% floor) due April 30, 2020(4)(5)(9)(10)(14)(17) | 15,000,000 | 14,468,082 | 12,900,000 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
4
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
COMPANY/INVESTMENT(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Stratus Technologies, Inc. | computer hardware | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.00% floor) due April 28, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) | $ | 17,354,167 | $ | 17,211,347 | $ | 17,252,992 | ||||||||||||||
Teleguam Holdings LLC | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 7.50% (1.25% floor) due June 10, 2019(4)(5)(10)(17) | 8,000,000 | 7,975,044 | 7,960,000 | |||||||||||||||||
The TOPPS Company, Inc. | leisure goods | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.00% (1.25% floor) due October 02, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | 9,825,000 | 9,756,578 | 9,628,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Merchant Services, Inc. | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.50% (1.00% floor) due December 5, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 15,880,000 | 15,737,128 | 15,959,400 | |||||||||||||||||
Travel Leaders Group, LLC | travel | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.00% (1.00% floor) due December 07, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | 14,600,000 | 14,376,711 | 14,563,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Unitek Global Services, Inc. | IT consulting | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured tranche B term loan, LIBOR + 7.50%, (1.00% floor) due January 13, 2019(4)(5)(10)(15) |
2,638,748 | 2,605,645 | 2,498,894 | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. Telepacific Corp. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.00% floor) due November 25, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(15) | 9,925,000 | 9,832,837 | 9,875,375 | |||||||||||||||||
Vision Solutions | software | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.50% floor) due July 23, 2016(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(17) | 4,728,153 | 4,698,873 | 4,722,243 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.00% (1.50% floor) due July 23, 2017(4)(5)(9)(10)(17) | 10,000,000 | 9,970,413 | 9,950,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Wall Street Systems | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.50% (1.00% floor) due April 30, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(15) | 8,124,639 | 8,128,033 | 8,080,603 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Senior Secured Notes | $ | 685,378,522 | $ | 680,407,920 | 145.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Subordinated Debt |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unitek Global Services, Inc. | IT consulting | |||||||||||||||||||
Holdco PIK Debt Cash 0.00%, 15.00% PIK, due July 13, 2019(3)(5)(10) | $ | 555,554 | $ | 550,093 | $ | 508,332 | ||||||||||||||
Total Subrodinated Debt | $ | 550,093 | $ | 508,332 | 0.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Collateralized Loan Obligation Debt Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||
Telos CLO 2013-3, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO secured class F notes, LIBOR + 5.50% due January 17, 2024(4)(5)(11)(12)(15) | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 2,762,650 | $ | 2,300,700 | ||||||||||||||
Total Collateralized Loan Obligation Debt Investments | $ | 2,762,650 | $ | 2,300,700 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||
AMMC CLO XI, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 14.12% due October 30, 2023(11)(12)(19) | $ | 6,000,000 | $ | 3,527,288 | $ | 3,600,000 | ||||||||||||||
AMMC CLO XII, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 11.18% due May 10, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 12,921,429 | 8,867,391 | 7,752,857 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
5
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
COMPANY/INVESTMENT(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||
Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Ares XXV CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 4.76% due January 17, 2024(11)(12)(19) | $ | 15,500,000 | $ | 11,503,418 | $ | 8,370,000 | ||||||||||||||
Ares XXVI CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 9.80% due April 15, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 14,250,000 | 10,577,547 | 7,346,757 | |||||||||||||||||
Ares XXIX CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 11.92% due April 17, 2026(11)(12)(19) | 12,750,000 | 10,338,546 | 7,440,953 | |||||||||||||||||
Benefit Street Partners CLO II, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 13.65% due July 15, 2024(11)(12)(19) | 23,450,000 | 22,638,457 | 19,850,265 | |||||||||||||||||
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2013-2, Ltd. |
structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 16.98% due April 18, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 10,125,000 | 7,789,656 | 7,028,021 | |||||||||||||||||
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2014-4, Ltd. |
structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 15.98% due October 15, 2026(11)(12)(19) | 25,784,000 | 19,477,450 | 17,902,222 | |||||||||||||||||
Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield (.40%) due December 20, 2023(11)(12)(19) | 22,000,000 | 17,096,038 | 9,055,200 | |||||||||||||||||
Catamaran CLO 2013-1 Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 7.14% due January 27, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 10,000,000 | 8,517,770 | 6,500,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Cedar Funding II CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 10.73% due March 9, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 18,750,000 | 14,817,101 | 12,515,625 | |||||||||||||||||
CIFC Funding 2012-1, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 13.64% due August 14, 2024(11)(12)(19) | 12,750,000 | 8,400,000 | 7,905,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2012-2 Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 16.15% due December 20, 2024(11)(12)(19) | 7,500,000 | 5,940,551 | 5,156,250 | |||||||||||||||||
Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2014-2 Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 15.72% due April 28, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 8,000,000 | 6,551,394 | 5,520,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Hull Street CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 16.31% due October 18, 2026(11)(12)(19) | 5,000,000 | 4,157,285 | 3,025,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Ivy Hill Middle Market Credit Fund VII, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 14.85% due October 20, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 14,000,000 | 12,549,004 | 11,783,733 | |||||||||||||||||
Jamestown CLO V Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 15.30% due January 17, 2027(11)(12)(19) | 8,000,000 | 6,196,275 | 4,000,800 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
6
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
COMPANY/INVESTMENT(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||
Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Marea CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 5.54% due October 15, 2023(11)(12)(19) | $ | 14,217,000 | $ | 11,642,231 | $ | 7,160,315 | ||||||||||||||
MidOcean Credit CLO IV | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO income notes, estimated yield 19.59% due April 15, 2027(11)(12)(19) | 9,500,000 | 8,620,993 | 8,455,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Mountain Hawk III CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO income notes, estimated yield 7.59% due April 18, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 15,000,000 | 12,379,826 | 6,403,308 | |||||||||||||||||
CLO M notes due April 18, 2025(11)(12)(13) | 2,389,676 | | 539,194 | |||||||||||||||||
Newmark Capital Funding 2013-1 CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO income notes, estimated yield 12.71% due June 2, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 20,000,000 | 14,530,875 | 11,400,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Och Ziff CLO XII, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 14.22% due April 30, 2027(11)(12)(19) | 13,850,000 | 13,170,498 | 12,465,000 | |||||||||||||||||
CS Advisors CLO I Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield (46.37%) due August 27, 2020(11)(12)(19) | 10,100,000 | 1,809,726 | 50,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Shackleton 2013-III CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 8.67% due April 15, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 9,407,500 | 8,159,594 | 5,101,978 | |||||||||||||||||
Shackleton 2013-IV CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 11.72% due January 13, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 21,500,000 | 18,320,851 | 12,747,015 | |||||||||||||||||
Telos CLO 2013-3, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 11.05% due January 17, 2024(11)(12)(19) | 10,416,666 | 8,544,099 | 7,083,333 | |||||||||||||||||
Telos CLO 2013-4, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 20.39% due July 17, 2024(11)(12)(19) | 9,000,000 | 6,478,082 | 6,287,445 | |||||||||||||||||
Telos CLO 2014-5, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 14.04% due April 17, 2015(11)(12)(19) | 10,500,000 | 8,450,800 | 6,235,847 | |||||||||||||||||
Windriver 2012-1 CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes, estimated yield 16.14% due January 15, 2024(11)(12)(19) | 7,500,000 | 5,650,357 | 5,446,771 | |||||||||||||||||
CLO equity side letter related investments(11)(12)(13) |
structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
| 3,103,898 | |||||||||||||||||||
Total Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments | $ | 296,703,103 | $ | 237,232,787 | 50.6 | % | ||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
||||||||||||||||||||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared) | software | |||||||||||||||||||
common stock(7) | $ | 100 | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
common stock(7)(14) | 775,846 | 1,712,397 | 4,424,048 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
7
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
COMPANY/INVESTMENT(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT/SHARES |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % of Net Assets |
|||||||||||||||
Common Stock (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unitek Global Services | retail | |||||||||||||||||||
common equity(7)(10) | $ | 815,266 | $ | 535,000 | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Total Common Stock | $ | 5,247,397 | $ | 4,424,048 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Preferred Equity |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unitek Global Services, Inc. | IT consulting | |||||||||||||||||||
Series A Preferred Equity(7)(10) | 5,706,866 | 3,677,000 | 2,307,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Preferred Equity | $ | 3,677,000 | $ | 2,307,000 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Investments(8) | $ | 994,318,765 | $ | 927,180,787 | 197.9 | % |
(1) | Other than Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared), which we may be deemed to control and Unitek Global Services, Inc., of which we are deemed to be an affiliate. We do not control and are not an affiliate of any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would be presumed to control a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an affiliate of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities. |
(2) | Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company. |
(3) | Portfolio includes $29,335,573 of principal amount of debt investments which contain a PIK provision at September 30, 2015, or during the quarter then ended. |
(4) | Notes bear interest at variable rates. |
(5) | Cost value reflects accretion of original issue discount or market discount. |
(6) | Cost value reflects repayment of principal. |
(7) | Non-income producing at the relevant period end. |
(8) | Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for federal income tax purposes is $12,829,314; aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $127,966,167. Net unrealized depreciation is $115,136,853 based upon a tax cost basis of $1,042,317,640. |
(9) | All or a portion of this investment represents collateral under the TICC Funding LLC credit facility. |
(10) | All or a portion of this investment represents TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC collateral. |
(11) | Indicates assets that the Company believes do not represent qualifying assets under Section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Qualifying assets must represent at least 70% of the Company's total assets at the time of acquisition of any additional non-qualifying assets. |
(12) | Investment not domiciled in the United States. |
(13) | Fair value represents discounted cash flows associated with fees earned from CLO equity investments. |
(14) | Aggregate investments represent greater than 5% of net assets. |
(15) | The principal balance outstanding for this debt investment, in whole or in part, is indexed to 90-day LIBOR. |
(16) | The principal balance outstanding for this debt investment, in whole or in part, is indexed to 1 year LIBOR. |
See Accompanying Notes.
8
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
(17) | The principal balance outstanding for this debt investment, in whole or in part, is indexed to 30-day LIBOR |
(18) | The principal balance outstanding for this debt investment, in whole or in part, is indexed to 180-day LIBOR |
(19) | The CLO subordinated notes and income notes are considered equity positions in the CLO funds. Equity investments are entitled to recurring distributions which are generally equal to the remaining cash flow of the payments made by the underlying fund's securities less contractual payments to debt holders and fund expenses. The estimated yield indicated is based upon a current projection of the amount and timing of these recurring distributions and the estimated amount of repayment of principal upon termination. Such projections are periodically reviewed and adjusted, and the estimated yield may not ultimately be realized. |
See Accompanying Notes.
9
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS
DECEMBER 31, 2014
COMPANY(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT/SHARES |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % OF NET ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes |
||||||||||||||||||||
ABB/Con Cise Optical Group | retail | |||||||||||||||||||
tranche B term loan, LIBOR + 3.50% (1.00% floor) due February 06, 2019(4)(5)(6)(10)(16) | $ | 6,541,775 | $ | 6,517,166 | $ | 6,378,231 | ||||||||||||||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared) | software | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.00% (9.84% all-in floor) due September 11, 2016(4)(5)(6)(10)(17) | 13,800,000 | 13,800,000 | 13,800,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Albertsons LLC | grocery | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, 4.50% due April 14, 2021(4)(5)(9)(10) | 13,000,000 | 13,009,539 | 12,986,480 | |||||||||||||||||
Amneal Pharmaceuticals LLC | pharmaceuticals | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due November 01, 2019(4)(5)(9)(10)(18) | 4,991,646 | 4,971,679 | 4,972,927 | |||||||||||||||||
Aricent Technologies, Inc. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.00% floor) due April 14, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(14)(18) | 14,923,753 | 14,877,921 | 14,874,057 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.50% (1.00% floor) due April 14, 2022(4)(5)(10)(14)(18) | 14,000,000 | 14,005,937 | 13,982,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Novitex Enterprise Solutions (F/K/A Pitney Bowes Management Services, Inc.) | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.25% (1.25% floor) due October 01, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(19) | 15,840,300 | 15,746,596 | 15,048,285 | |||||||||||||||||
Ascensus, Inc. | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due December 02, 2019(4)(5)(6)(10)(16) | 9,402,519 | 9,415,372 | 9,320,247 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.00% (1.00% floor) due December 2, 2020(4)(5)(9)(16) | 2,000,000 | 1,974,098 | 1,976,260 | |||||||||||||||||
Birch Communications, Inc. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.75% (1.00% floor) due July 18, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 15,544,444 | 15,270,572 | 15,233,555 | |||||||||||||||||
Blue Coat System, Inc. | software | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.00% (1.00% floor) due May 31, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(16) | 3,979,856 | 3,996,178 | 3,832,601 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.50% (1.00% floor) due June 28, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(16) | 15,000,000 | 14,874,235 | 14,625,000 | |||||||||||||||||
BMC Software Finance, Inc. | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due September 10, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(16) | 4,776,389 | 4,791,903 | 4,636,106 | |||||||||||||||||
Capstone Logistics Acquisition, Inc. | logistics | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.00% floor) due June 17, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 13,965,000 | 14,024,103 | 13,877,719 | |||||||||||||||||
ConvergeOne Holdings Corp. | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.00% floor) due June 17, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 15,920,000 | 15,864,439 | 15,840,400 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.00% (1.00% floor) due June 17, 2021(4)(5)(19) | 3,000,000 | 2,971,530 | 2,910,000 | |||||||||||||||||
CRCI Holdings, Inc. | utilities | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due July 10, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 9,897,500 | 9,866,707 | 9,610,473 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
10
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2014
COMPANY(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT/SHARES |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % OF NET ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
CT Technologies Intermediate | healthcare | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00%, (1.00% floor) due December 01, 2021(4)(5)(9)(18) | $ | 9,000,000 | $ | 8,969,867 | $ | 8,932,500 | ||||||||||||||
Deltek Systems, Inc. | enterprise software | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.50% (1.00% floor) due October 10, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(16) | 4,557,000 | 4,534,433 | 4,500,038 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.75% (1.25% floor) due October 10, 2019(4)(5)(6)(10)(16) | 10,000,000 | 9,899,125 | 10,025,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Edmentum, Inc. (F/K/A Plato, Inc.) | education | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.00% floor) due May 17, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 6,508,724 | 6,455,462 | 5,272,066 | |||||||||||||||||
First American Payment Systems | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.25% floor) due October 04, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 3,035,078 | 3,044,185 | 3,002,845 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 9.50% (1.25% floor) due April 12, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 13,982,241 | 13,766,556 | 13,860,036 | |||||||||||||||||
First Data Corporation | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, (LIBOR + 4.00%) due March 24, 2021(4)(5)(9)(10)(18) | 16,050,721 | 16,007,723 | 15,797,601 | |||||||||||||||||
GlobalLogic Holdings Inc. | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.25% (1.00% floor) due June 02, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 17,325,000 | 17,255,320 | 17,065,125 | |||||||||||||||||
Global Tel Link Corp | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.75% (1.25% floor) due May 23, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(16) | 6,081,329 | 6,057,284 | 6,010,360 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 7.75% (1.25% floor) due November 23, 2020(4)(5)(6)(10)(16) | 13,000,000 | 12,862,984 | 12,685,790 | |||||||||||||||||
Help/Systems Holdings, Inc. | software | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50 (1.00% floor) due June 28, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(14)(16) | 14,812,500 | 14,688,520 | 14,590,313 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes LIBOR + 8.50% (1.00% floor) due June 28, 2020(4)(5)(14)(16) | 15,000,000 | 14,809,418 | 14,775,000 | |||||||||||||||||
iEnergizer Limited | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.00% (1.25% floor) due May 01, 2019(4)(5)(6)(10)(11)(12)(18) | 6,800,000 | 6,682,947 | 6,120,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Immucor, Inc. | healthcare | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured term B notes, LIBOR + 3.75% (1.25% floor) due August 19, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(16) | 4,355,040 | 4,257,926 | 4,291,064 | |||||||||||||||||
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.25% floor) due February 22, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 10,341,486 | 10,302,601 | 10,037,757 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.50%, (1.25% floor) due February 22, 2020(4)(5)(9)(10)(16) | 8,850,000 | 8,896,162 | 8,772,563 | |||||||||||||||||
Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, Inc. | consumer services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.50% (1.25% floor) due October 16, 2017(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 20,682,892 | 20,152,560 | 20,579,478 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
11
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2014
COMPANY(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT/SHARES |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % OF NET ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Knowledge Universe Education | education | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.25% (1.00% floor) due March 18, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | $ | 10,947,425 | $ | 10,982,820 | $ | 10,920,056 | ||||||||||||||
Merrill Communications, LLC | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.75% (1.00% floor) due March 08, 2018(4)(5)(6)(10)(14)(18) | 17,083,900 | 17,084,727 | 16,955,771 | |||||||||||||||||
NAB Holdings, LLC | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.75% (1.00% floor) due May 21, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 17,915,000 | 17,784,542 | 17,803,031 | |||||||||||||||||
Nextag, Inc. | retail | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, Cash 0.00%/9.25% PIK, due June 04, 2019(3)(10) |
2,264,719 | 2,264,720 | 1,585,303 | |||||||||||||||||
Novetta, LLC | aerospace and defense | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.00% floor) due September 29, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 12,718,125 | 12,610,453 | 12,654,534 | |||||||||||||||||
PGX Holdings | consumer services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.25% (1.00% floor) due September 29, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(19) | 15,403,125 | 15,367,784 | 15,383,871 | |||||||||||||||||
Petco Animal Supplies, Inc. | retail | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.00% (1.00% floor) due November 24, 2017(4)(5)(6)(9)(16) | 5,984,416 | 5,941,589 | 5,907,097 | |||||||||||||||||
Presidio IS Corp. | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due March 31, 2017(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 8,331,082 | 8,315,126 | 8,305,091 | |||||||||||||||||
ProQuest LLC | education | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.25% (1.00% floor) due October 24, 2021(4)(5)(9)(20) | 6,000,000 | 6,037,262 | 5,940,000 | |||||||||||||||||
RBS Holding Company | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.75% (1.50% floor) cash 1.25% PIK due March 23, 2017(3)(4)(5)(6)(16) | 22,731,656 | 12,520,134 | 15,502,989 | |||||||||||||||||
Recorded Books, Inc. (F/K/A Volume Holdings, Inc.) | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.25% (1.00% floor) due January 31, 2020(4)(5)(6)(10)(16) | 9,300,000 | 9,213,403 | 9,207,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Safenet, Inc. | software | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes PRIME + 3.5% due March 05, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(10) | 9,925,000 | 9,837,828 | 9,925,000 | |||||||||||||||||
SCS Holdings I Inc. (Sirius Computer Solutions, Inc.) | electronics | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.75% (1.25% floor) due December 07, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(18) | 3,388,942 | 3,363,761 | 3,388,942 | |||||||||||||||||
Securus Technologies, Inc. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.50% (1.25% floor) due April 30, 2020(4)(5)(6)(9)(16) | 5,944,956 | 5,898,190 | 5,858,754 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 7.75% (1.25% floor) due April 30, 2021(4)(5)(10)(16) | 6,400,000 | 6,370,703 | 6,272,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Sesac Holdco II LLC | radio and television | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.00% (1.00% floor) due February 08, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 14,384,593 | 14,397,006 | 14,231,829 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
12
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2014
COMPANY(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT/SHARES |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % OF NET ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Serena Software Inc. | enterprise software | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.50% (1.00% floor) due April 14, 2020(4)(5)(9)(10)(18) | $ | 20,000,000 | $ | 19,640,149 | $ | 19,768,800 | ||||||||||||||
Source Hov, LLC | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.75% (1.00% floor) due October 31, 2019(4)(5)(9)(10)(14)(18) | 18,000,000 | 17,471,194 | 17,460,000 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 10.50% (1.00% floor) due April 30, 2020(4)(5)(9)(10)(14)(18) | 15,000,000 | 14,405,564 | 14,287,500 | |||||||||||||||||
STG-Fairway Acquisitions | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.25% floor) due February 28, 2019(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 9,211,018 | 9,141,920 | 9,038,311 | |||||||||||||||||
Stratus Technologies, Inc. | computer hardware | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.00% floor) due April 28, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 19,075,000 | 18,909,604 | 18,939,949 | |||||||||||||||||
Symphony Teleca Services Inc. | business services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.75% (1.00% floor) due August 07, 2019(4)(5)(9)(10)(18) | 16,000,000 | 15,847,256 | 15,840,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Teleguam Holdings LLC | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 7.50% (1.25% floor) due June 10, 2019(4)(5)(10)(18) | 8,000,000 | 7,962,890 | 7,952,000 | |||||||||||||||||
The TOPPS Company, Inc. | leisure goods | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.00% (1.25% floor) due October 02, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 9,900,000 | 9,816,492 | 9,603,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Merchant Services, Inc. | financial intermediary | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.50% (1.00% floor) due December 5, 2020(4)(5)(9)(10)(16) | 16,000,000 | 15,840,699 | 15,840,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Travel Leaders Group, LLC | travel | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 6.00% (1.00% floor) due December 05, 2018(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(16) | 15,200,000 | 14,934,118 | 15,124,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Unitek Global Services, Inc. | IT consulting | |||||||||||||||||||
tranche B term loan, LIBOR + 13.50%, (1.50% floor) Cash 0.00%/PIK 15.00% due April 15, 2018(3)(4)(5)(6)(10)(15)(18) | 12,772,315 | 11,608,604 | 6,667,148 | |||||||||||||||||
U.S. Telepacific Corp. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 5.00% (1.00% floor) due November 25, 2020(4)(5)(9)(10)(18) | 10,000,000 | 9,900,312 | 9,779,200 | |||||||||||||||||
US FT HoldCo. Inc. (A/K/A Fundtech) | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.50% (1.00% floor) due November 30, 2017(4)(5)(6)(9)(16) | 6,207,712 | 6,227,876 | 6,139,427 | |||||||||||||||||
Vision Solutions | software | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 4.50% (1.50% floor) due July 23, 2016(4)(5)(6)(9)(10)(18) | 5,248,096 | 5,202,145 | 5,195,615 | |||||||||||||||||
second lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 8.00% (1.50% floor) due July 23, 2016(4)(5)(9)(10)(18) | 10,000,000 | 9,958,342 | 9,600,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Wall Street Systems | financial intermediaries | |||||||||||||||||||
first lien senior secured notes, LIBOR + 3.50% (1.00% floor) due April 30, 2021(4)(5)(6)(9)(18) | 5,878,332 | 5,863,887 | 5,654,955 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Senior Secured Notes | $ | 705,342,148 | $ | 696,953,550 | 133.8 | % |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
13
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2014
COMPANY(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT/SHARES |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % OF NET ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes |
||||||||||||||||||||
Merrill Communications, LLC | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
senior unsecured PIK notes Cash 0.00%/10.00% PIK, due March 08, 2023(3)(5)(6)(14) | $ | 6,351,153 | $ | 3,724,816 | $ | 6,351,153 | ||||||||||||||
Total Senior Unsecured Notes | $ | 3,724,816 | $ | 6,351,153 | 1.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Collateralized Loan Obligation Debt Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||
AMMC CLO XII, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO secured class F notes, LIBOR + 5.05% due May 10, 2025(4)(5)(11)(12)(16) | $ | 4,500,000 | $ | 3,936,123 | $ | 3,701,250 | ||||||||||||||
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2013-2, Ltd. |
structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO secured class F notes, LIBOR + 5.40% due April 18, 2025(4)(5)(11)(12)(16) | 6,000,000 | 5,183,376 | 5,122,200 | |||||||||||||||||
Telos CLO 2013-3, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO secured class F notes, LIBOR + 5.50% due January 17, 2024(4)(5)(11)(12)(16) | 3,000,000 | 2,744,951 | 2,521,200 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Collateralized Loan Obligation Debt Investments | $ | 11,864,450 | $ | 11,344,650 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments |
||||||||||||||||||||
ACAS CLO 2012-1, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due September 20, 2023(11)(12)(19) | $ | 5,000,000 | $ | 4,050,000 | $ | 3,800,000 | ||||||||||||||
AMMC CLO XII, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due May 10, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 12,921,429 | 9,949,500 | 9,303,429 | |||||||||||||||||
Ares XXV CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due January 17, 2024(11)(12)(19) | 15,500,000 | 12,620,875 | 10,850,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Ares XXVI CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due April 15, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 22,750,000 | 18,295,625 | 15,479,495 | |||||||||||||||||
Ares XXIX CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due April 17, 2026(11)(12)(19) | 12,750,000 | 11,156,250 | 10,784,314 | |||||||||||||||||
Benefit Street Partners CLO II, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due July 15, 2024(11)(12)(19) | 23,450,000 | 24,704,625 | 22,760,050 | |||||||||||||||||
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2013-2, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due April 18, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 10,125,000 | 7,955,000 | 7,848,089 | |||||||||||||||||
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2014-4, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due October 15, 2026(11)(12)(19) | 25,784,000 | 22,689,920 | 21,916,400 | |||||||||||||||||
Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due December 20, 2023(11)(12)(19) |
22,000,000 | 20,075,000 | 14,520,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Catamaran CLO 2013-1 Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due January 27, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 10,000,000 | 9,750,000 | 8,300,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Cedar Funding II CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due March 9, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 18,750,000 | 15,631,250 | 14,062,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2012-2 Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due December 20, 2024(11)(12)(19) |
7,500,000 | 6,750,000 | 7,200,000 | |||||||||||||||||
Hull Street CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due October 18, 2026(11)(12) | 5,000,000 | 4,412,500 | 4,412,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Ivy Hill Middle Market Credit Fund VII, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due October 20, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 14,000,000 | 13,272,000 | 11,343,930 |
(Continued on next page)
See Accompanying Notes.
14
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2014
COMPANY(1) | INDUSTRY | PRINCIPAL AMOUNT/SHARES |
COST | FAIR VALUE(2) | % OF NET ASSETS |
|||||||||||||||
Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments (continued) |
||||||||||||||||||||
Jamestown CLO V Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due January 17, 2027(11)(12)(19) | $ | 8,000,000 | $ | 6,400,000 | $ | 6,400,000 | ||||||||||||||
Marea CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due October 15, 2023(11)(12)(19) | 14,217,000 | 12,644,215 | 10,750,460 | |||||||||||||||||
Mountain Hawk III CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO income notes due April 18, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 15,000,000 | 13,473,000 | 11,729,070 | |||||||||||||||||
CLO M notes due April 18, 2025(11)(12)(13) | 2,389,676 | | 570,082 | |||||||||||||||||
Newmark Capital Funding 2013-1 CLO Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO income notes due June 2, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 20,000,000 | 16,400,000 | 15,400,000 | |||||||||||||||||
CS Advisors CLO I Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due August 27, 2020(11)(12)(13) | 10,100,000 | 4,543,935 | 2,070,500 | |||||||||||||||||
Shackleton 2013-III CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due April 15, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 13,407,500 | 13,073,425 | 10,496,657 | |||||||||||||||||
Shackleton 2013-IV CLO, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due January 13, 2025(11)(12)(19) | 21,500,000 | 20,573,750 | 17,688,284 | |||||||||||||||||
Telos CLO 2013-3, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due January 17, 2024(11)(12)(19) | 12,666,666 | 11,558,333 | 10,639,999 | |||||||||||||||||
Telos CLO 2014-5, Ltd. | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO subordinated notes due April 17, 2015(11)(12)(19) | 10,500,000 | 9,450,000 | 7,671,510 | |||||||||||||||||
Other CLO equity related investments | structured finance | |||||||||||||||||||
CLO other(11)(12)(13) | | | 3,816,649 | |||||||||||||||||
Total Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investments | $ | 289,429,203 | $ | 259,813,918 | 49.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Common Stock |
||||||||||||||||||||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared) | software | |||||||||||||||||||
common stock(7) | $ | 100 | $ | 3,000,000 | $ | 1,160,000 | ||||||||||||||
Integra Telecom Holdings, Inc. | telecommunication services | |||||||||||||||||||
common stock(7) | 775,846 | 1,712,397 | 4,258,112 | |||||||||||||||||
Merrill Communications, LLC | printing and publishing | |||||||||||||||||||
common equity(7)(14) | 728,442 | 3,425,244 | 4,275,955 | |||||||||||||||||
Nextag, Inc. | retail | |||||||||||||||||||
common equity(7) | 11,226,123 | 2,004,002 | | |||||||||||||||||
Total Common Stock Investments | $ | 10,141,643 | $ | 9,694,067 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Warrants |
||||||||||||||||||||
Unitek Global Services, Inc. | IT consulting | |||||||||||||||||||
warrants to purchase common stock(7)(10) | $ | 309,080 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||||||
Total Warrants | $ | | $ | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total Investments(8) | $ | 1,020,502,260 | $ | 984,157,338 | 189.0 | % |
(1) | Other than Algorithmic Implementation, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared), which we may be deemed to control and Nextag, Inc., of which we are deemed to be an affiliate. We do not control and are not an affiliate of any of our portfolio companies, each as defined in the Investment Company Act of 1940 (the 1940 Act). In general, under the 1940 Act, we would be presumed to control a portfolio company if we owned 25% or more of its voting securities and would be an affiliate of a portfolio company if we owned 5% or more of its voting securities. |
See Accompanying Notes.
15
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED SCHEDULE OF INVESTMENTS (Continued)
DECEMBER 31, 2014
(2) | Fair value is determined in good faith by the Board of Directors of the Company. |
(3) | Portfolio includes $44,119,843 of principal amount of debt investments which contain a PIK provision. |
(4) | Notes bear interest at variable rates. |
(5) | Cost value reflects accretion of original issue discount or market discount. |
(6) | Cost value reflects repayment of principal. |
(7) | Non-income producing at the relevant period end. |
(8) | Aggregate gross unrealized appreciation for federal income tax purposes is $14,859,779; aggregate gross unrealized depreciation for federal income tax purposes is $69,463,970. Net unrealized depreciation is $54,604,191 based upon a tax cost basis of $1,038,761,529. |
(9) | All or a portion of this investment represents collateral under the revolving credit agreement. |
(10) | All or a portion of this investment represents TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC collateral. |
(11) | Indicates assets that the Company believes do not represent qualifying assets under Section 55(a) of the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. Qualifying assets must represent at least 70% of the Companys total assets at the time of acquisition of any additional non-qualifying assets. |
(12) | Investment not domiciled in the United States. |
(13) | Fair value represents discounted cash flows associated with fees earned from CLO equity investments. |
(14) | Aggregate investments represent greater than 5% of net assets on a fair value basis. |
(15) | Investment is on non-accrual status. During the period ended December 31, 2014, the investment defaulted on its principal and interest payments. |
(16) | The principal balance outstanding for this debt investment, in whole or in part, is indexed to 90-day LIBOR. |
(17) | The principal balance outstanding for this debt investment, in whole or in part, is indexed to 1 year LIBOR. |
(18) | The principal balance outstanding for this debt investment, in whole or in part, is indexed to 30-day LIBOR. |
(19) | The principal balance outstanding for this debt investment, in whole or in part, is indexed to 180-day LIBOR. |
(20) | The principal balance outstanding for this debt investment, in whole or in part, is indexed to 60-day LIBOR. |
See Accompanying Notes.
16
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(unaudited)
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||
INVESTMENT INCOME |
||||||||||||||||
From non-affiliated/non-control investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income debt investments | $ | 13,720,125 | $ | 12,727,990 | $ | 39,025,069 | $ | 38,350,310 | ||||||||
Income from securitization vehicles and investments | 8,617,121 | 15,170,869 | 26,396,541 | 45,047,290 | ||||||||||||
Commitment, amendment fee income and other income | 372,935 | 1,877,067 | 1,985,306 | 4,267,879 | ||||||||||||
Total investment income from non-affiliated/non-control investments | 22,710,181 | 29,775,926 | 67,406,916 | 87,665,479 | ||||||||||||
From affiliated investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income debt investments | 78,616 | 50,436 | 221,097 | 65,139 | ||||||||||||
Total investment income from affiliated investments | 78,616 | 50,436 | 221,097 | 65,139 | ||||||||||||
From control investments: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income debt investments | 345,591 | 349,361 | 1,026,283 | 1,036,691 | ||||||||||||
Total investment income from control investments | 345,591 | 349,361 | 1,026,283 | 1,036,691 | ||||||||||||
Total investment income | 23,134,388 | 30,175,723 | 68,654,296 | 88,767,309 | ||||||||||||
EXPENSES |
||||||||||||||||
Compensation expense | 89,660 | 472,903 | 965,293 | 1,399,476 | ||||||||||||
Investment advisory fees | 5,255,583 | 5,366,277 | 15,574,269 | 15,764,248 | ||||||||||||
Professional fees | 818,926 | 603,940 | 2,330,702 | 1,601,883 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense and other debt financing expenses | 5,031,343 | 4,963,796 | 14,969,915 | 14,805,182 | ||||||||||||
General and administrative | 488,939 | 384,543 | 1,673,389 | 1,567,799 | ||||||||||||
Total expenses before incentive fees | 11,684,451 | 11,791,459 | 35,513,568 | 35,138,588 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income incentive fees | 575,319 | 1,701,699 | (929,933 | ) | 4,806,278 | |||||||||||
Capital gains incentive fees | | (837,963 | ) | | (3,872,853 | ) | ||||||||||
Total incentive fees | 575,319 | 863,736 | (929,933 | ) | 933,425 | |||||||||||
Total expenses | 12,259,770 | 12,655,195 | 34,583,635 | 36,072,013 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income | 10,874,618 | 17,520,528 | 34,070,661 | 52,695,296 | ||||||||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | ||||||||||||||||
Non-Affiliate/non-control investments | (37,399,544 | ) | (15,123,443 | ) | (34,358,991 | ) | (18,359,672 | ) | ||||||||
Affiliated investments | (1,610,530 | ) | (198,545 | ) | 5,571,560 | 3,728,836 | ||||||||||
Control investments | (2,005,625 | ) | | (2,005,625 | ) | (740,000 | ) | |||||||||
Total net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | (41,015,699 | ) | (15,321,988 | ) | (30,793,056 | ) | (15,370,836 | ) | ||||||||
Net realized gains/(losses) on investments |
||||||||||||||||
Non-Affiliated/non-control investments | 406,343 | (3,460,465 | ) | 4,606,405 | (6,925,632 | ) | ||||||||||
Affiliated investments | | | (6,762,328 | ) | (5,264,838 | ) | ||||||||||
Total net realized gains/(losses) on investments | 406,343 | (3,460,465 | ) | (2,155,923 | ) | (12,190,470 | ) | |||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ | (29,734,738 | ) | $ | (1,261,925 | ) | $ | 1,121,682 | $ | 25,133,990 | ||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.90 | ||||||||
Diluted | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.85 | ||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||
Diluted | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||
Weighted average shares of common stock outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic | 59,987,986 | 60,268,078 | 59,997,565 | 58,307,825 | ||||||||||||
Diluted | 70,021,138 | 70,301,230 | 70,030,717 | 68,340,977 | ||||||||||||
Distributions per share | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.85 | $ | 0.87 |
See Accompanying Notes.
17
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN NET ASSETS
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
|||||||
Increase (decrease) in net assets from operations: |
||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 34,070,661 | $ | 65,457,844 | ||||
Net realized losses on investments | (2,155,923 | ) | (19,492,649 | ) | ||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/(depreciation) on investments | (30,793,056 | ) | (49,313,595 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in net assets resulting from operations | 1,121,682 | (3,348,400 | ) | |||||
Distributions to shareholders |
||||||||
Distributions from net investment income | (50,989,788 | ) | (60,189,322 | ) | ||||
Tax return of capital distributions | | (9,697,552 | ) | |||||
Total distributions to shareholders | (50,989,788 | ) | (69,886,874 | ) | ||||
Capital share transactions: |
||||||||
Issuance of common stock (net of offering costs of $0 and $2,033,950, respectively) | | 66,411,050 | ||||||
Repurchase of common stock | (2,386,209 | ) | (1,172,574 | ) | ||||
Reinvestment of distributions | | 2,567,433 | ||||||
Net (decrease)/increase in net assets from capital share transactions | (2,386,209 | ) | 67,805,909 | |||||
Total decrease in net assets | (52,254,315 | ) | (5,429,365 | ) | ||||
Net assets at beginning of period | 520,813,061 | 526,242,426 | ||||||
Net assets at end of period (including over distributed net investment income of $20,170,528 and $3,251,401, respectively) | $ | 468,558,746 | $ | 520,813,061 | ||||
Capital share activity: |
||||||||
Shares sold | | 6,750,000 | ||||||
Shares repurchased | (315,783 | ) | (154,600 | ) | ||||
Shares issued from reinvestment of distributions | | 307,624 | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in capital share activity | (315,783 | ) | 6,903,024 |
See Accompanying Notes.
18
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited)
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ | 1,121,682 | $ | 25,133,989 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net increase in net assets resulting from operations to net cash used by operating activities: |
||||||||
Accretion of discounts on investments | (30,137,613 | ) | (2,084,266 | ) | ||||
Accretion of discount on notes payable and deferred debt issuance costs | 1,400,334 | 1,394,558 | ||||||
Increase in investments due to PIK | (519,286 | ) | (966,960 | ) | ||||
Purchases of investments | (215,296,186 | ) | (355,027,153 | ) | ||||
Repayments of principal and reductions to investment cost value | 210,451,894 | 220,455,237 | ||||||
Proceeds from the sale of investments | 51,024,934 | 102,755,346 | ||||||
Net realized losses on investments | 2,155,923 | 12,190,470 | ||||||
Net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments | 30,793,056 | 15,370,836 | ||||||
Increase in interest and distributions receivable | (1,155,218 | ) | (2,012,971 | ) | ||||
Increase in other assets | (18,481 | ) | (374,667 | ) | ||||
Increase in accrued interest payable | 2,367,921 | 2,154,771 | ||||||
Decrease in investment advisory fee payable | (352,584 | ) | (76,504 | ) | ||||
Decrease in accrued capital gains incentive fee | | (3,872,853 | ) | |||||
Increase in accrued expenses | 311,496 | 367,040 | ||||||
Net cash provided (used) by operating activities | 52,147,872 | 15,406,873 | ||||||
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Change in restricted cash | 1,938,922 | (18,610,225 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided (used) by investing activities | 1,938,922 | (18,610,225 | ) | |||||
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Proceeds from the issuance of common stock | | 68,445,000 | ||||||
Offering expenses from the issuance of common stock | | (2,033,950 | ) | |||||
Distributions paid (net of stock issued under dividend reinvestment plan of $0 and $1,847,625, respectively) | (50,989,788 | ) | (50,535,499 | ) | ||||
Repurchase of common stock | (2,386,209 | ) | | |||||
Net cash (used) provided by financing activities | (53,375,997 | ) | 15,875,551 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents | 710,797 | 12,672,200 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period | 20,505,323 | 14,933,074 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period | $ | 21,216,120 | $ | 27,605,274 | ||||
NON-CASH FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
||||||||
Value of shares issued in connection with dividend reinvestment plan | $ | | $ | 1,847,625 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES |
||||||||
Securities sold not settled | $ | 10,242 | $ | | ||||
Securities purchased not settled | $ | 2,850,000 | $ | 10,721,250 | ||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 11,201,660 | $ | 11,255,851 |
See Accompanying Notes.
19
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 1. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Interim consolidated financial statements of TICC Capital Corp. (TICC and, together with its subsidiaries, the Company) are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP) for interim financial information and pursuant to the requirements for reporting on Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, certain disclosures accompanying annual financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP are omitted. In the opinion of management, all adjustments, consisting of normal recurring accruals, necessary for the fair statement of consolidated financial results for the interim periods have been included. The current periods consolidated results of operations are not necessarily indicative of results that may be achieved for the year. The interim consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, as filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).
NOTE 2. ORGANIZATION
TICC was incorporated under the General Corporation Laws of the State of Maryland on July 21, 2003 and is a non-diversified, closed-end investment company. TICC has elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). In addition, TICC has elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company (RIC), under Subchapter M of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code). The Companys investment objective is to maximize its total return, by investing primarily in corporate debt securities.
TICCs investment activities are managed by TICC Management, LLC (TICC Management), a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. BDC Partners, LLC (BDC Partners) is the managing member of TICC Management and serves as the administrator of TICC.
The Companys operations include the activities of its wholly-owned subsidiary, TICC Capital Corp. 2011-1 Holdings, LLC (Holdings), TICC CLO LLC (2011 Securitization Issuer or TICC CLO), TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC (2012 Securitization Issuer or TICC CLO 2012-1) and TICC Funding, LLC (TICC Funding) for the periods in which they were held. These subsidiaries were formed for the purpose of enabling the Company to obtain debt financing and are operated solely for the investment activities of the Company, and the Company has substantial equity at risk. TICC Funding was formed on September 17, 2014, for the purpose of entering into a credit and security agreement with Citibank, N.A., to replace the financing previously obtained through TICC CLO. TICC CLO effectively ceased operations on October 27, 2014, and the notes payable by TICC CLO were repaid with borrowings under the debt facility of TICC Funding. See Note 7. Borrowings for additional information on the Companys subsidiaries and their borrowings.
NOTE 3. CHANGE OF ACCOUNTING FOR COLLATERALIZED LOAN OBLIGATION EQUITY INVESTMENT INCOME
During the first quarter of 2015, the Company identified a non-material error in its accounting for income from Collateralized Loan Obligation (CLO) equity investments. The Company had recorded income from its CLO equity investments using the dividend recognition model as described in ASC 946-320; specifically, dividends were recognized on the applicable record date, subject to estimation and collectability, with a reduction to cost basis in those instances where the Company believed that a return of capital had occurred. The Company has determined that the appropriate method for recording investment income on CLO equity investments is the effective yield method as described in ASC 325-40. This method requires the calculation of an effective yield to expected redemption based upon an estimation of the amount and timing of future cash flows, including recurring cash flows as well as future principal repayments; the difference between the actual cash received (and record date distributions to be received) and the effective yield income calculation is an adjustment to cost. The effective yield is reviewed quarterly and adjusted as appropriate.
20
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 3. CHANGE OF ACCOUNTING FOR COLLATERALIZED LOAN OBLIGATION EQUITY INVESTMENT INCOME (continued)
The difference between the two methods resulted in an income reclassification error which would generally have resulted in a decrease in total investment income with a corresponding and offsetting increase to net change in unrealized appreciation/depreciation on investments and net realized gains/losses on investments. The Company quantified this error and assessed it in accordance with the guidance provided in SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin (SAB) 108, Considering the Effects of Prior Year Misstatements When Quantifying Misstatements in Current Year Financial Statements. Based on this assessment, the Company concluded that the error in income classification did not have a material impact on the Companys previously filed consolidated financial statements.
As a result of this misclassification of income, net investment income incentive fees were overstated by approximately $2.4 million on a cumulative basis through 2014 and, as a result, total net assets as of December 31, 2014 were understated by the same amount, approximately $0.04 per share. The Company also considered this indirect impact of the error in classification, concluded that the error was not material to the Companys previously filed consolidated financial statements. The error was corrected by an out-of-period adjustment in the first quarter of 2015, reducing net investment income incentive fees by approximately $2.4 million and recognizing a corresponding due from affiliate of $2.4 million. TICC Management repaid in full to TICC, on April 30, 2015, the portion of its previously paid net investment income incentive fees attributable to the overstated amounts.
Prospectively as of January 1, 2015, the Company records income from its CLO equity investments using the effective yield method in accordance with the accounting guidance in ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, based upon an estimation of an effective yield to maturity utilizing assumed cash flows.
NOTE 4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
BASIS OF PRESENTATION
The accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries, Holdings, TICC CLO, TICC CLO 2012-1 and TICC Funding. All inter-company accounts and transaction have been eliminated in consolidation.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, the Company recorded an out of period adjustment related to a miscalculation of discount accretion which increased interest income and increased investment cost, by approximately $1.4 million. The increase in the investment cost has a corresponding effect on the investment's unrealized depreciation of the same amount. Management concluded the adjustment was not material to previously filed financial statements.
The Company follows the accounting and reporting guidance in FASB Accounting Standards Codification 946.
USE OF ESTIMATES
The consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America that require management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. Actual results may differ from those estimates.
In the normal course of business, the Company may enter into contracts that contain a variety of representations and provide indemnifications. The Companys maximum exposure under these arrangements is unknown as this would involve future claims that may be made against the Company that have not yet occurred. However, based upon experience, the Company expects the risk of loss to be remote.
21
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
CONSOLIDATION
As provided under Regulation S-X and ASC Topic 946-810 Financial Services Investment Companies, the Company will generally not consolidate its investment in a company other than a wholly-owned investment company or a controlled operating company whose business consists of providing services to the Company. TICC CLO, TICC CLO 2012-1 and TICC Funding would be considered investment companies but for the exceptions under Sections 3(c)(1) and 3(c)(7) under the 1940 Act, and were established solely for the purpose of allowing the Company to borrow funds for the purpose of making investments. The Company owns all of the equity in these entities and controls the decision making power that drives their economic performance. Accordingly, the Company consolidates the results of the Companys wholly-owned subsidiaries in its financial statements, and follows the accounting and reporting guidance in ASC 946-810.
CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
Cash and cash equivalents consist of demand deposits and highly liquid investments with original maturities of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents are carried at cost or amortized cost which approximates fair value. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, cash and cash equivalents consisted solely of demand deposits.
Restricted cash represents the cash held by the trustees of the Companys CLO and special purpose vehicle subsidiaries. These amounts are held by the trustee for payment of interest expense and operating expenses of the entity, principal repayments on borrowings, or new investments, based upon the terms of the respective indenture, and are not available for general corporate purposes.
INVESTMENT VALUATION
The Company fair values its investment portfolio in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure. Estimates made in the preparation of TICCs consolidated financial statements include the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded. TICC believes that there is no single definitive method for determining fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments TICC makes.
ASC 820-10 clarified the definition of fair value and requires companies to expand their disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, which includes inputs such as quoted prices for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities in markets that are not active; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. TICC considers the attributes of current market conditions on an on-going basis and has determined that due to the general illiquidity of the market for its investment portfolio, whereby little or no market data exists, almost all of TICCs investments are based upon Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2015.
TICCs Board of Directors determines the value of its investment portfolio each quarter. In connection with that determination, members of TICC Managements portfolio management team prepare a quarterly analysis of each portfolio investment using the most recent portfolio company financial statements, forecasts and other relevant financial and operational information. Since March 2004, TICC has engaged third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing certain of its syndicated loans and bilateral investments,
22
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
including related equity investments, although TICCs Board of Directors ultimately determines the appropriate valuation of each such investment. Changes in fair value, as described above, are recorded in the statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Syndicated Loans
In accordance with ASC 820-10-35, TICCs valuation procedures specifically provide for the review of indicative quotes supplied by the large agent banks that make a market for each security. However, the marketplace from which TICC obtains indicative bid quotes for purposes of determining the fair value of its syndicated loan investments has shown attributes of illiquidity as described by ASC-820-10-35. During such periods of illiquidity, when TICC believes that the non-binding indicative bids received from agent banks for certain syndicated investments that we own may not be determinative of their fair value or when no market indicative quote is available, TICC may engage third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing certain syndicated investments that TICC owns. In addition, TICC Management prepares an analysis of each syndicated loan, financial summary, covenant compliance review, recent trading activity in the security, if known, and other business developments related to the portfolio company. All available information, including non-binding indicative bids which may not be determinative of fair value, is presented to the Valuation Committee to consider in its determination of fair value. In some instances, there may be limited trading activity in a security even though the market for the security is considered not active. In such cases the Valuation Committee will consider the number of trades, the size and timing of each trade, and other circumstances around such trades, to the extent such information is available, in its determination of fair value. The Valuation Committee will evaluate the impact of such additional information, and factor it into its consideration of the fair value that is indicated by the analysis provided by third-party valuation firms, if any.
Collateralized Loan Obligations Debt and Equity
During the past several years, TICC has acquired a number of debt and equity positions in CLO investment vehicles and more recently CLO warehouse investments. These investments are special purpose financing vehicles. In valuing such investments, TICC considers the indicative prices provided by a recognized industry pricing service as a primary source, and the implied yield of such prices, supplemented by actual trades executed in the market at or around period-end, as well as the indicative prices provided by the broker who arranges transactions in such investment vehicles. TICC also considers those instances in which the record date for an equity distribution payment falls on the last day of the period, and the likelihood that a prospective purchaser would require a downward adjustment to the indicative price representing substantially all of the pending distribution. Additional factors include any available information on other relevant transactions including firm bids and offers in the market and information resulting from bids-wanted- in-competition. In addition, TICC considers the operating metrics of the specific investment vehicle, including compliance with collateralization tests, defaulted and restructured securities, and payment defaults, if any. TICC Management or the Valuation Committee may request an additional analysis by a third-party firm to assist in the valuation process of CLO investment vehicles. All information is presented to TICCs Board of Directors for its determination of fair value of these investments.
Bilateral Investments (Including Equity)
Bilateral investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued by an independent pricing agent or market maker. If such market quotations are not readily available, under the valuation procedures approved by TICCs Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Valuation Committee, a third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of TICCs bilateral investments that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company, (i) have a value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of its total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of its total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into
23
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, in those instances where a third-party valuation is prepared for a portfolio investment which meets the parameters noted in (i) and (ii) above, the frequency of those third-party valuations is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under its credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly. Bilateral investments which do not meet the parameters in (i) and (ii) above are not required to have a third-party valuation and, in those instances, a valuation analysis will be prepared by TICC Management. TICC Management also retains the authority to seek, on TICCs behalf, additional third party valuations with respect to both TICCs bilateral portfolio securities and TICCs syndicated loan investments. TICCs Board of Directors retains ultimate authority as to the third-party review cycle as well as the appropriate valuation of each investment.
INVESTMENT INCOME
Interest Income
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis using the contractual rate applicable to each debt investment and includes the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums. Discounts from and premiums to par value on securities purchased are accreted/amortized into interest income over the life of the respective security using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums, if any.
Generally, when interest and/or principal payments on a loan become past due, or if the Company otherwise does not expect the borrower to be able to service its debt and other obligations, the Company will place the loan on non-accrual status and will generally cease recognizing interest income on that loan for financial reporting purposes until all principal and interest have been brought current through payment or due to restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. The Company generally restores non-accrual loans to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in the Companys judgment, is likely to remain current. As of September 30, 2015, the Company held no non-accrual assets in its portfolio; as of September 30, 2014, the Companys investment in Unitek Global Services, Inc.s senior secured notes was on non-accrual status.
In addition, the Company earns income from the discount on debt securities it purchases, including original issue discount (OID) and market discount. Original issue discount and market discounts are capitalized and amortized into income using the interest method, as applicable.
Income from Securitization Vehicles and Equity Investments
Income from investments in the equity class securities of CLO vehicles (typically income notes or subordinated notes) is recorded using the effective interest method in accordance with the provisions of ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, based upon an estimation of an effective yield to maturity utilizing assumed cash flows, including those CLO equity investments that have not made their inaugural distribution for the relevant period end. The Company monitors the expected residual payments, and effective yield is determined and updated periodically, as needed. Accordingly, investment income recognized on CLO equity securities in the GAAP statement of operations differs from both the tax-basis investment income and from the cash distributions actually received by the Company during the period.
Payment-In-Kind
TICC has investments in its portfolio which contain a contractual payment-in-kind (PIK) provision. Certain PIK investments offer issuers the option at each payment date of making payments in cash or additional securities. PIK interest computed at the contractual rate is accrued into income and added to the principal balance on the capitalization date. Upon capitalization, PIK is subject to the fair value estimates
24
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
associated with their related investments. PIK investments on non-accrual status are restored to accrual status once it becomes probable that PIK will be realized. To maintain its status as a RIC, this income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though TICC has not collected any cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments.
Other Income
Other income includes distributions from fee letters, closing or origination fees, and success fees associated with portfolio investments. Distributions from fee letters are an enhancement to the return on a CLO equity investment and are based upon a percentage of the collateral managers fees, and are recorded as other income when earned. Closing or origination fees, if any, are normally paid at closing of an investment, are fully earned and non-refundable, and generally are non-recurring. The Company may also earn success fees associated with its investments in certain securitization vehicles or CLO warehouse facilities, which are contingent upon a take-out of the warehouse by a permanent CLO structure; such fees are earned and recognized when the take-out is completed.
DEFERRED DEBT ISSUANCE COSTS
Deferred debt issuance costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the closing or amending of credit facilities and debt offerings, and are capitalized at the time of payment. These costs are amortized using the straight line method over the terms of the respective credit facilities and debt securities. This amortization expense is included in interest expense in the Companys financial statements. Upon early termination of debt, or a credit facility, the remaining balance of unaccreted fees related to such debt is accelerated into interest expense.
EQUITY OFFERING COSTS
Equity offering costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in connection with the registration and public offer and sale of the Companys common stock, including legal, accounting and printing fees. These costs are deferred at the time of incurrence and are subsequently charged to capital when the offering takes place or as shares are issued. Deferred costs are periodically reviewed and expensed if the related registration is no longer active.
SHARE REPURCHASES
From time to time, the Companys Board of Directors may authorize a share repurchase program under which shares are purchased in open market transactions. Since the Company is incorporated in the State of Maryland, state law requires share repurchases to be accounted for as a share retirement. The cost of repurchased shares is charged against capital on the settlement date. As of September 30, 2015, the Company did not have an active share repurchase program.
OTHER ASSETS
Other assets consists of prepaid expenses associated primarily with insurance costs.
U.S. FEDERAL INCOME TAXES
The Company intends to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under Subchapter M of the Code and, as such, to not be subject to U.S. federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify for RIC tax treatment, TICC is required to distribute at least 90% of its investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code.
25
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 4. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (continued)
Because U.S. federal income tax regulations differ from accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, distributions in accordance with tax regulations may differ from net investment income and realized gains recognized for financial reporting purposes. Differences may be permanent or temporary. Permanent differences are reclassified among capital accounts in the financial statement to reflect their tax character. Temporary differences arise when certain items of income, expense, gain or loss are recognized at some time in the future. Differences in classification may also result from the treatment of short-term gains as ordinary income for tax purposes.
For tax purposes, the cost basis of the portfolio investments at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, was approximately $1,042,317,640 and $1,038,761,529, respectively.
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE
The Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2015 were as follow:
($ in millions) | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | |||||||||||||||
Assets | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Total | ||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes | $ | 0.0 | $ | 49.1 | $ | 631.4 | $ | 680.5 | ||||||||
Subordinated Debt | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | ||||||||||||
CLO Debt | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.3 | 2.3 | ||||||||||||
CLO Equity | 0.0 | 0.0 | 237.2 | 237.2 | ||||||||||||
Equity | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.7 | 6.7 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 0.0 | $ | 49.1 | $ | 878.1 | $ | 927.2 |
The Companys assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2014 were as follows:
($ in millions) | Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using | |||||||||||||||
Assets | Quoted Prices in Active Markets for Identical Assets (Level 1) |
Significant Other Observable Inputs (Level 2) |
Significant Unobservable Inputs (Level 3) |
Total | ||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes | $ | 0.0 | $ | 39.3 | $ | 657.7 | $ | 697.0 | ||||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes | 0.0 | 0.0 | 6.4 | 6.4 | ||||||||||||
CLO Debt | 0.0 | 0.0 | 11.3 | 11.3 | ||||||||||||
CLO Equity | 0.0 | 0.0 | 259.8 | 259.8 | ||||||||||||
Equity | 0.0 | 0.0 | 9.7 | 9.7 | ||||||||||||
Total | $ | 0.0 | $ | 39.3 | $ | 944.9 | $ | 984.2 |
26
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE (continued)
Significant Unobservable Inputs for Level 3 Investments
The following tables provide quantitative information about the Companys Level 3 fair value measurements as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The Companys valuation policy, as described above, establishes parameters for the sources and types of valuation analysis, as well as the methodologies and inputs that the Company uses in determining fair value. If the Valuation Committee or TICC Management determines that additional techniques, sources or inputs are appropriate or necessary in a given situation, such additional work will be undertaken. The tables, therefore, are not all-inclusive, but provide information on the significant Level 3 inputs that are pertinent to the Companys fair value measurements. The weighted average calculations in the table below are based on principal balances for all debt related calculations and CLO equity.
($ in millions) | Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements | |||||||||||||||
Assets | Fair Value as of September 30, 2015 |
Valuation Techniques/ Methodologies |
Unobservable Input | Range/Weighted Average(8) | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt investments syndicated | $ | 551.2 | Market quotes | NBIB(1) |
70.3% 100.5%/98.0% |
|||||||||||
16.2 | Yield Analysis | NBIB(1) | 99.4% 99.5%/99.4% | |||||||||||||
Discount Margin | 4.50%/ncm(4) |
|||||||||||||||
29.7 | Recent transactions | Actual trade/payoff(6) |
100.0% |
|||||||||||||
21.9 | Market quotes/ Enterprise value |
NBIB(1) | 83.1% 94.7%/84.5% | |||||||||||||
EBITDA multiples | (2) | 4.25x 5.75x/ncm(4) | ||||||||||||||
bilateral | 12.9 | Enterprise value(7) | EBITDA(2) |
$ | 1.7/ncm(4) |
|||||||||||
Market multiples(2) |
$ | 5.0x $6.0x/ncm(4) |
||||||||||||||
Discount rates(3) |
N/A |
|||||||||||||||
CLO debt | 2.3 | Market quotes | NBIB(1) |
76.7% |
||||||||||||
CLO equity | 233.5 | Market quotes | NBIB(1) |
41.2% 90.0%/63.5% |
||||||||||||
0.1 | Recent transactions | Actual trade(6) |
0.5% 0.5%/0.5% |
|||||||||||||
3.6 | Discounted cash flow | (5) | Discount rate(3)(5) |
10.4% 16.7%/ncm(4) |
||||||||||||
Equity Shares | 6.7 | Enterprise value(7)/ | EBITDA(2) | $ | 1.7 $188.6/ncm(4) | |||||||||||
Discounted cash flow | Market multiples(2) | 4.3x-8.6x/ncm(4) | ||||||||||||||
Discount rates(3) |
20.0%/ncm(4) |
|||||||||||||||
Total Fair Value for Level 3 Investments | $ | 878.1 |
(1) | The Company generally uses prices provided by an independent pricing service, or broker or agent bank non-binding indicative bid prices (NBIB) on or near the valuation date as the primary basis for the fair value determinations for syndicated notes, and CLO debt and equity investments, which may be adjusted for pending equity distributions as of valuation date. These bid prices are non-binding, and may not be determinative of fair value. Each bid price is evaluated by the Valuation Committee in conjunction with additional information compiled by TICC Management, including financial performance, recent business developments, and, in the case of CLO debt and equity investments, performance and covenant compliance information as provided by the independent trustee. |
27
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE (continued)
(2) | EBITDA, or earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, is an unobservable input which is generally based on most recently available twelve month financial statements provided by the portfolio company. Market multiples, also an unobservable input, represent an estimation of where market participants might value an enterprise based upon information available for comparable companies in the market. |
(3) | Discount rate represents the rate at which future cash flows are discounted to calculate a present value, reflecting market assumptions for risk. |
(4) | The calculation of weighted average for a range of values, for multiple investments within a given asset category, is not considered to provide a meaningful representation (ncm). |
(5) | The Company will calculate the fair value of certain CLO equity investments based upon the net present value of expected contractual payment streams discounted using estimated market yields for the equity tranche of the respective CLO vehicle. TICC will also consider those investments in which the record date for an equity distribution payment falls on the last day of the period, and the likelihood that a prospective purchaser would require an adjustment to the transaction price representing substantially all of the pending distribution. |
(6) | Prices provided by independent pricing services are evaluated in conjunction with actual trades and payoffs and, in certain cases, the value represented by actual trades or payoffs may be more representative of fair value as determined by the Valuation Committee. |
(7) | For the Companys bilateral debt investments and equity investments, third-party valuation firms evaluate the financial and operational information of the portfolio companies that we provide to them, as well as independent market and industry information that they consider appropriate in forming an opinion as to the fair value of our securities. In those instances where the carrying value and/or internal credit rating of the investment does not require the use of a third-party valuation firm, a valuation is prepared by TICC Management, which may include liquidation analysis or which may utilize a subsequent transaction to provide an indication of fair value. |
(8) | Weighted averages are calculated based on fair value of investments. |
28
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE (continued)
($ in millions) | Quantitative Information about Level 3 Fair Value Measurements | |||||||||||||||
Assets | Fair Value as of December 31, 2014 |
Valuation Techniques/ Methodologies |
Unobservable Input | Range/Weighted Average(8) | ||||||||||||
Corporate debt investments syndicated | $ | 563.1 | Market quotes | NBIB(1) |
70.0% 100.3%/98.2% |
|||||||||||
39.6 | Yield Analysis | NBIB(1) Discount Margin |
96.2% 99.4%/97.7% 4.10% 7.90%/ncm(4) |
|||||||||||||
19.0 | Recent transactions | Actual trade/payoffs(6) |
98.1% 100.0%/99.1% |
|||||||||||||
28.6 | Market quotes/ Enterprise value |
NBIB(1) | 52.2% 100.0%/68.1% | |||||||||||||
EBITDA multiples(2) | 4.25x 6.75x/ncm(4) | |||||||||||||||
bilateral | 13.8 | Enterprise value(7) | EBITDA(2) Market multiples(2) |
$ | 2.5/ncm(4) 5.0x 6.0x/ncm(4) |
|||||||||||
Discount rates(3) | N/A | |||||||||||||||
CLO debt | 11.3 | Market quotes | NBIB(1) |
82.3% 85.4%/84.0% |
||||||||||||
CLO equity | 244.6 | Market quotes | NBIB(1) |
20.5% 97.1%/77.2% |
||||||||||||
10.8 | Recent transactions | Actual trade(6) |
80.0% 88.3%/83.2% |
|||||||||||||
4.4 | Discounted cash flow | (5) | Discount rates(3)(5) |
10.2% 13.6%/ncm(4) |
||||||||||||
Common stock | 9.7 | Enterprise value(7)/ Discounted cash flow(5) |
EBITDA(2) Market multiples(2) Discount rates(3) |
$ | 2.5 $170.8/ncm(4) 4.3x 9.3x/ncm(4) 20.0%/ncm(4) |
|||||||||||
Total Fair Value for Level 3 Investments | $ | 944.9 |
(1) | The Company generally uses prices provided by an independent pricing service, or broker or agent bank non-binding indicative bid prices (NBIB) on or near the valuation date as the primary basis for the fair value determinations for syndicated notes, and CLO debt and equity investments, which may be adjusted for pending equity distributions as of valuation date. These bid prices are non-binding, and may not be determinative of fair value. Each bid price is evaluated by the Valuation Committee in conjunction with additional information compiled by TICC Management, including financial performance, recent business developments, and, in the case of CLO debt and equity investments, performance and covenant compliance information as provided by the independent trustee. |
(2) | EBITDA, or earnings before interest expense, taxes, depreciation and amortization, is an unobservable input which is generally based on most recently available twelve month financial statements provided by the portfolio company. Market multiples, also an unobservable input, represent an estimation of where market participants might value an enterprise based upon information available for comparable companies in the market. |
(3) | Discount rate represents the rate at which future cash flows are discounted to calculate a present value, reflecting market assumptions for risk. |
(4) | The calculation of weighted average for a range of values, for multiple investments within a given asset category, is not considered to provide a meaningful representation (ncm). |
(5) | The Company will calculate the fair value of certain CLO equity investments based upon the net present value of expected contractual payment streams discounted using estimated market yields for the equity tranche of the respective CLO vehicle. TICC will also consider those investments in which the record date for an equity distribution payment falls on the last day of the period, and the likelihood that a prospective purchaser would require an adjustment to the transaction price representing substantially all of the pending distribution. |
29
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE (continued)
(6) | Prices provided by independent pricing services are evaluated in conjunction with actual trades and payoffs and, in certain cases, the value represented by actual trades or payoffs may be more representative of fair value as determined by the Valuation Committee. |
(7) | For the Companys bilateral debt investments and equity investments, third-party valuation firms evaluate the financial and operational information of the portfolio companies that we provide to them, as well as independent market and industry information that they consider appropriate in forming an opinion as to the fair value of our securities. In those instances where the carrying value and/or internal credit rating of the investment does not require the use of a third-party valuation firm, a valuation is prepared by TICC Management, which may include liquidation analysis or which may utilize a subsequent transaction to provide an indication of fair value. |
(8) | Weighted averages are calculated based on fair value of investments. |
Financial Instruments Disclosed, But Not Carried, At Fair Value
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Companys financial liabilities disclosed, but not carried, at fair value as of September 30, 2015 and the level of each financial liability within the fair value hierarchy:
($ in thousands) | Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||
TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility(1) | $ | 150,000 | $ | 150,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 150,000 | ||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 Notes(2)(3) | 174,419 | 175,340 | | | 175,340 | |||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 Notes(2)(3) | 19,564 | 19,838 | | | 19,838 | |||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 Notes(2)(3) | 22,262 | 22,885 | | | 22,885 | |||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 Notes(2)(3) | 20,162 | 21,000 | | | 21,000 | |||||||||||||||
2017 Convertible Notes(3) | 115,000 | 118,450 | 118,450 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 501,407 | $ | 507,513 | $ | | $ | | $ | 507,513 |
(1) | TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility fair value represents the par amount of the debt obligation. |
(2) | Carrying value is net of discount. |
(3) | Fair value is based upon the bid price provided by the placement agent at the measurement date. |
The following table presents the carrying value and fair value of the Companys financial liabilities disclosed, but not carried, at fair value as of December 31, 2014 and the level of each financial liability within the fair value hierarchy:
($ in thousands) | Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||||
TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility(1) | $ | 150,000 | $ | 150,000 | $ | | $ | | $ | 150,000 | ||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 Notes(2)(3) | 174,271 | 176,000 | | | 176,000 | |||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 Notes(2)(3) | 19,524 | 20,000 | | | 20,000 | |||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 Notes(2)(3) | 22,194 | 23,000 | | | 23,000 | |||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 Notes(2)(3) | 20,087 | 21,011 | | | 21,011 | |||||||||||||||
2017 Convertible Notes(3) | 115,000 | 119,025 | 119,025 | |||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 501,076 | $ | 509,036 | $ | | $ | | $ | 509,036 |
(1) | TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility fair value represents the par amount of the debt obligation. |
(2) | Carrying value is net of discount. |
(3) | Fair value is based upon the bid price provided by the placement agent at the measurement date. |
30
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE (continued)
A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for the three months ended September 30, 2015, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:
($ in millions) | Senior Secured Notes |
Senior Unsecured Notes |
Subordinated Debt |
CLO Debt |
CLO Equity |
Equity | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2015 | $ | 616.9 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.6 | $ | 2.5 | $ | 276.5 | $ | 9.9 | $ | 906.4 | ||||||||||||||
Realized gains (losses) included in earnings | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.4 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (depreciation) appreciation included in earnings(1) | (4.7 | ) | 0.0 | (0.1 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (32.5 | ) | (3.2 | ) | (40.7 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount | 2.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 8.6 | 0.0 | 10.8 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases | 63.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.9 | 0.0 | 66.3 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments and Sales | (46.8 | ) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (18.3 | ) | 0.0 | (65.1 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Payment in Kind income | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or (out) of level 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2015 | $ | 631.4 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 2.3 | $ | 237.2 | $ | 6.7 | $ | 878.1 | ||||||||||||||
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date and reported within the net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments in our Statement of Operations(1) | $ | (4.5 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (32.5 | ) | $ | (3.1 | ) | $ | (40.4 | ) |
(1) | Includes rounding adjustments to reconcile period balances. |
31
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE (continued)
A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for the nine months ending September 30, 2015, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:
($ in millions) | Senior Secured Notes |
Senior Unsecured Notes |
Subordinated Debt |
CLO Debt |
CLO Equity |
Equity | Total | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2014 | $ | 657.7 | $ | 6.4 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 11.3 | $ | 259.8 | $ | 9.7 | $ | 944.9 | ||||||||||||||
Realized (losses) gains included in earnings | (3.9 | ) | 2.6 | 0.0 | (0.1 | ) | (1.6 | ) | 0.8 | (2.2 | ) | |||||||||||||||||
Unrealized appreciation (depreciation) included in earnings(1) | 3.6 | (2.6 | ) | (0.1 | ) | 0.1 | (29.9 | ) | (1.8 | ) | (30.7 | ) | ||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount | 3.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 26.3 | 0.0 | 30.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases | 138.2 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 61.2 | 4.2 | 204.1 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments and Sales | (168.0 | ) | (6.6 | ) | 0.0 | (9.2 | ) | (78.6 | ) | (6.2 | ) | (268.6 | ) | |||||||||||||||
Payment in Kind income | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or (out) of level 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2015 | $ | 631.4 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.5 | $ | 2.3 | $ | 237.2 | $ | 6.7 | $ | 878.1 | ||||||||||||||
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date and reported within the net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments in our Statement of Operations | $ | (2.3 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (0.2 | ) | $ | (32.1 | ) | $ | (2.9 | ) | $ | (37.6 | ) |
(1) | Includes rounding adjustments to reconcile period balances. |
32
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE (continued)
A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for the three months ended September 30, 2014, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:
($ in millions) | Senior Secured Notes |
Senior Unsecured Notes |
CLO Debt |
CLO Equity |
Common Stock |
Preferred Share Equity |
Warrants to Purchase Equity |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at June 30, 2014 | $ | 657.1 | $ | 6.1 | $ | 21.5 | $ | 264.6 | $ | 14.5 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.1 | $ | 963.9 | ||||||||||||||||
Realized gains (losses) included in earnings | 0.2 | 0.0 | 1.5 | (5.2 | ) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (3.5 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (depreciation) appreciation included in earnings(1) | (8.5 | ) | 0.0 | (1.8 | ) | (6.6 | ) | 1.9 | 0.0 | (0.1 | ) | (15.1 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases | 38.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 59.6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 97.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments and Sales | (69.8 | ) | 0.0 | (9.8 | ) | (41.4 | ) | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | (121.0 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Payment in Kind income | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of level 3 |
0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2014 | $ | 617.6 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 11.5 | $ | 271.0 | $ | 16.4 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 922.8 | ||||||||||||||||
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date and reported within the net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments in our Statement of Operations | $ | (8.6 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (12.5 | ) | $ | 2.0 | $ | 0.0 | $ | (0.1 | ) | $ | (19.3 | ) |
(1) | Includes rounding adjustments to reconcile period balances. |
33
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 5. FAIR VALUE (continued)
A reconciliation of the fair value of investments for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, utilizing significant unobservable inputs, is as follows:
($ in millions) | Senior Secured Notes |
Senior Unsecured Notes |
CLO Debt |
CLO Equity |
Common Stock |
Preferred Share Equity |
Warrants to Purchase Equity |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at December 31, 2013 | $ | 627.8 | $ | 5.8 | $ | 28.9 | $ | 237.1 | $ | 13.8 | $ | 0.4 | $ | 0.9 | $ | 914.7 | ||||||||||||||||
Realized gains (losses) included in earnings | (6.0 | ) | 0.0 | 2.2 | (7.4 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (0.4 | ) | (12.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized (depreciation) appreciation included in earnings(1) | (5.0 | ) | 0.1 | (2.5 | ) | (8.4 | ) | 1.0 | (0.2 | ) | (0.2 | ) | (15.2 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Accretion of discount(1) | 1.7 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Purchases | 236.7 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 120.2 | 2.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 358.9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Repayments and Sales(1) | (238.2 | ) | 0.0 | (17.4 | ) | (70.5 | ) | 0.0 | 0.0 | (0.3 | ) | (326.4 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Payment in Kind income | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Transfers in and/or out of level 3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance at September 30, 2014 | $ | 617.6 | $ | 6.3 | $ | 11.5 | $ | 271.0 | $ | 16.4 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 0.0 | $ | 922.8 | ||||||||||||||||
The amount of total gains or losses for the period included in earnings attributable to the change in unrealized gains or losses relating to our Level 3 assets still held at the reporting date and reported within the net change in unrealized gains or losses on investments in our Statement of Operations | $ | (8.2 | ) | $ | 0.0 | $ | (0.5 | ) | $ | (14.9 | ) | $ | 0.6 | $ | 0.0 | $ | (0.4 | ) | $ | (23.4 | ) |
(1) | Includes rounding adjustments to reconcile period balances. |
The following table shows the fair value of TICCs portfolio of investments by asset class as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes | $ | 680.5 | 73.4 | % | $ | 697.0 | 70.8 | % | ||||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | 6.4 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||
Subordinated Debt | 0.5 | 0.1 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
CLO Equity | 237.2 | 25.6 | % | 259.8 | 26.4 | % | ||||||||||
CLO Debt | 2.3 | 0.2 | % | 11.3 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||
Equity | 6.7 | 0.7 | % | 9.7 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 927.2 | 100.0 | % | $ | 984.2 | 100.0 | % |
34
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 6. CASH, CASH EQUIVALENTS AND RESTRICTED CASH
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash were as follows:
September 30, 2015 |
December 31, 2014 |
|||||||
Cash | $ | 21,216,120 | $ | 20,505,323 | ||||
Cash Equivalents | | | ||||||
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents | $ | 21,216,120 | $ | 20,505,323 | ||||
Restricted Cash | $ | 18,637,328 | $ | 20,576,250 |
NOTE 7. BORROWINGS
In accordance with the 1940 Act, with certain limited exceptions, the Company is only allowed to borrow amounts such that its asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% immediately after such borrowing. The most recent borrowing was the TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility which occurred on October 27, 2014, at which point the asset coverage was in excess of 200%. As of September 30, 2015, the Companys asset coverage for borrowed amounts was 192.1%.
The following are the Companys outstanding principal amounts, carrying values and fair values of the Companys borrowings as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Fair values of our notes payable are based upon the bid price provided by the placement agent at the measurement date, if available:
As of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | Principal Amount |
Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
Principal Amount |
Carrying Value |
Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 2023 Notes | $ | 176,000 | $ | 174,419 | (1) | $ | 175,340 | $ | 176,000 | $ | 174,271 | (1) | $ | 176,000 | ||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 2023 Notes | 20,000 | 19,564 | (1) | 19,838 | 20,000 | 19,524 | (1) | 20,000 | ||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 2023 Notes | 23,000 | 22,262 | (1) | 22,885 | 23,000 | 22,194 | (1) | 23,000 | ||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 2023 Notes | 21,000 | 20,162 | (1) | 21,000 | 21,000 | 20,087 | (1) | 21,011 | ||||||||||||||||
Sub-total TICC CLO 2012-1, LLC Notes | 240,000 | 236,407 | 239,063 | 240,000 | 236,076 | 240,011 | ||||||||||||||||||
TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility(2) | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
2017 Convertible Notes | 115,000 | 115,000 | 118,450 | 115,000 | 115,000 | 119,025 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 505,000 | $ | 501,407 | $ | 507,513 | $ | 505,000 | $ | 501,076 | $ | 509,036 |
(1) | Represents the aggregate principal amount outstanding less the unaccreted discount. As of September 30, 2015, the total unaccreted discount for the 2023 Class A Notes, the 2023 Class B Notes, the 2023 Class C Notes and the 2023 Class D Notes was approximately $1,581, $436, $738 and $838, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the total unaccreted discount for the 2023 Class A Notes, the 2023 Class B Notes, the 2023 Class C Notes and the 2023 Class D Notes was approximately $1,729, $476, $806 and $913, respectively. |
(2) | TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility fair value represents the par amount of the debt obligation. |
The weighted average stated interest rate and weighted average maturity on all our debt outstanding as of September 30, 2015 were 3.60% and 4.9 years, respectively, and as of December 31, 2014 were 3.54% and 5.6 years, respectively.
35
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 7. BORROWINGS (continued)
The table below summarizes the components of interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Stated Interest Expense |
Note Discount Expense |
Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs |
Total | Stated Interest Expense |
Note Discount Expense |
Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO LLC Class A Notes | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 642.4 | $ | 40.0 | $ | 76.3 | $ | 758.7 | ||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 Notes | 912.3 | 50.0 | | 962.3 | 890.7 | 49.9 | | 940.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 Notes | 192.1 | 13.6 | | 205.7 | 190.7 | 13.5 | | 204.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 Notes | 293.6 | 22.7 | | 316.3 | 292.7 | 22.5 | | 315.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 Notes | 321.2 | 25.4 | | 346.6 | 320.9 | 25.2 | | 346.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC amortization of deferred debt | | | 86.7 | 86.7 | | | 86.7 | 86.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 Convertible Notes | 2,156.3 | | 156.0 | 2,312.3 | 2,156.3 | | 156.0 | 2,312.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility |
683.8 | | 117.6 | 801.4 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 4,559.3 | $ | 111.7 | (1) | $ | 360.3 | $ | 5,031.3 | $ | 4,493.7 | $ | 151.1 | $ | 319.0 | $ | 4,963.8 |
(1) | Includes rounding adjustments to reconcile period balances. |
The table below summarizes the components of interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Stated Interest Expense |
Note Discount Expense |
Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs |
Total | Stated Interest Expense |
Note Discount Expense |
Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs |
Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO LLC Class A Notes | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,907.4 | $ | 118.8 | $ | 226.2 | $ | 2,252.4 | ||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 Notes | 2,688.2 | 148.4 | | 2,836.6 | 2,646.5 | 148.1 | | 2,794.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 Notes | 569.9 | 40.3 | | 610.2 | 566.2 | 40.1 | | 606.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 Notes | 872.6 | 67.2 | | 939.8 | 869.1 | 66.7 | | 935.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 Notes | 955.4 | 75.3 | | 1,030.7 | 952.8 | 74.4 | | 1,027.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC amortization of deferred debt | | | 257.2 | 257.2 | | | 257.2 | 257.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 Convertible Notes | 6,468.8 | | 463.0 | 6,931.8 | 6,468.7 | | 463.0 | 6,931.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility |
2,014.7 | | 348.9 | 2,363.6 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 13,569.6 | $ | 331.2 | $ | 1,069.1 | $ | 14,969.9 | $ | 13,410.7 | $ | 448.1 | $ | 946.4 | $ | 14,805.2 |
36
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 7. BORROWINGS (continued)
The aggregate accrued interest which remained payable at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, was approximately $5.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
Debt Securitization
Notes Payable TICC CLO LLC
On August 10, 2011, TICC completed a $225.0 million debt securitization financing transaction. The Class A Notes and the subordinated notes offered in the debt securitization were issued by TICC CLO, a subsidiary of Holdings, which was in turn a direct subsidiary of TICC. The Class A Notes were secured by the assets held by the 2011 Securitization Issuer. The securitization was executed through a private placement of $101.25 million of secured notes rated AAA/Aaa by Standard & Poors Rating Service (S&P) and Moodys Investors Service Inc. (Moodys), respectively, and bearing interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.25%. As of October 26, 2014, Holdings retained all of the subordinated notes, which totaled $123.75 million (the 2011 Subordinated Notes), and retained all the membership interests in the 2011 Securitization Issuer. The notes were sold at a discount to par, and the amount of the discount is being amortized over the term of the notes.
On October 27, 2014, in conjunction with the revolving debt credit facility established under TICC Funding LLC, the Company redeemed all of the $101,250,000 Class A secured notes issued by TICC CLO (see discussion on Credit Facility, below). On April 27, 2015, TICC Capital Corp., as collateral manager, on behalf of TICC CLO, executed the full satisfaction and discharge of the underlying indenture of the issuer, TICC CLO.
The following table sets forth the components of interest expense, effective annualized average interest rates and cash paid for interest for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
TICC CLO LLC | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||
Stated interest expense | $ | | $ | 642,399 | $ | | $ | 1,907,378 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred issuance costs | | 76,251 | | 226,266 | ||||||||||||
Note discount expense | | 40,047 | | 118,788 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | $ | | $ | 758,697 | $ | | $ | 2,252,432 | ||||||||
Effective annualized average interest rate | | 2.97 | % | | 2.97 | % | ||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | | $ | 634,405 | $ | | $ | 1,908,191 |
Notes Payable TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC
On August 23, 2012, the Company completed a $160 million debt securitization financing transaction, consisting of $120 million in secured notes and $40 million of the 2012 Subordinated Notes. On February 25, 2013 and May 28, 2013, TICC CLO 2012-1 issued additional secured notes totaling an aggregate of $120 million and 2012 Subordinated Notes totaling an aggregate of $40 million, which 2012 Subordinated Notes were purchased by us, under the accordion feature of the debt securitization which allowed, under certain circumstances and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for an increase in the amount of secured and subordinated notes. It is not necessary that the Company own all or any of the notes permitted by this feature, which may affect the accounting treatment of the debt securitization financing transaction. As of September 30, 2015, the secured notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer have an aggregate face amount of $240 million and were issued in four classes. The class A-1 notes have a current face amount of $176 million, are rated AAA (sf)/Aaa (sf) by Standard & Poors Ratings Services (S&P) and Moodys Investors Service, Inc.
37
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 7. BORROWINGS (continued)
(Moodys), respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 1.75%. The class B-1 notes have a current face amount of $20 million, are rated AA (sf)/Aa2 (sf) by S&P and Moodys, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. The class C-1 notes have a current face amount of $23 million, are rated A (sf)/A2 (sf) by S&P and Moodys, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 4.75%. The class D-1 notes have a current face amount of $21 million, are rated BBB (sf)/Baa2 (sf) by S&P and Moodys, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 5.75%. TICC presently owns all of the 2012 Subordinated Notes, which totaled $80 million as of September 30, 2015.
During a period of up to four years from the closing date, all principal collections received on the underlying collateral may be used by the 2012 Securitization Issuer to purchase new collateral under our direction in our capacity as collateral manager of the 2012 Securitization Issuer and in accordance with our investment strategy, allowing us to maintain the initial leverage in the securitization for such four-year period. All note classes are scheduled to mature on August 25, 2023.
The proceeds of the private placement of the Classes A, B, C, D and 2012 Subordinated Notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer, net of discount and debt issuance costs, were used for investment purposes. As part of the securitization, we entered into a master loan sale agreement with TICC CLO 2012-1 pursuant to which we agreed to sell or contribute certain senior secured and second lien loans (or participation interests therein) to TICC CLO 2012-1, and to purchase or otherwise acquire the 2012 Subordinated Notes. The Classes A, B, C, D and 2012 Subordinated Notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer are the secured obligations of TICC CLO 2012-1, and an indenture governing the notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer includes customary covenants and events of default.
As of September 30, 2015, there were 42 investments in portfolio companies with a total fair value of approximately $311.8 million, collateralizing the secured notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer. The pool of loans in the securitization must meet certain requirements, including asset mix and concentration, collateral coverage, term, agency rating, minimum coupon, minimum spread and sector diversity requirements.
The aggregate accrued interest payable on the notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer at September 30, 2015 was approximately $0.7 million. Deferred debt issuance costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in connection with debt offerings. As of September 30, 2015, TICC had a deferred debt issuance balance of approximately $2.7 million associated with this securitization. Aggregate net discount on the notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer at the time of issuance totaled approximately $4.9 million. These amounts are being amortized and included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the term of the debt securitization. The following table sets forth the components of interest expense, effective annualized average interest rates, and cash paid for interest of the Class A-1, B-1, C-1 and D-1 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||
Stated interest expense | $ | 1,719,273 | $ | 1,695,008 | $ | 5,086,180 | $ | 5,034,494 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred issuance costs | 86,662 | 86,662 | 257,160 | 257,160 | ||||||||||||
Note discount expense | 111,801 | 111,149 | 331,278 | 329,347 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 1,917,736 | $ | 1,892,819 | $ | 5,674,618 | $ | 5,621,001 | ||||||||
Effective annualized average interest rate | 3.17 | % | 3.13 | % | 3.16 | % | 3.13 | % | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 1,707,969 | $ | 1,656,290 | $ | 5,081,521 | $ | 5,035,160 |
38
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 7. BORROWINGS (continued)
Effective January 1, 2015 and through February 24, 2015, the interest charged under the securitization was based on three-month LIBOR, which was 0.233%. Effective February 25, 2015 and through May 25, 2015, the interest charged under the securitization was based on three month LIBOR, which was approximately 0.262%. Effective May 26, 2015 and through August 25, 2015, the interest charged under the securitization was based on three month LIBOR, which was approximately 0.282%. Effective August 26, 2015 and through September 30, 2015, the interest charged under the securitization was based on three month LIBOR, which was approximately 0.329%.
The classes, interest rates, spread over LIBOR, cash paid for interest, stated interest expense and note discount expense of each of the Class A-1, B-1, C-1 and D-1 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, is as follows:
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC | Stated Interest Rate |
LIBOR Spread (basis points) |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Paid for Interest |
Stated Interest Expense |
Note Discount Expense |
Cash Paid for Interest |
Stated Interest Expense |
Note Discount Expense |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A-1 Notes | 2.07910 | % | 175 | $ | 904,014 | $ | 912,304 | $ | 50,035 | $ | 2,680,960 | $ | 2,688,206 | $ | 148,407 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B-1 Notes | 3.82910 | % | 350 | 191,201 | 192,143 | 13,603 | 570,071 | 569,923 | 40,315 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C-1 Notes | 5.07910 | % | 475 | 292,555 | 293,638 | 22,709 | 873,603 | 872,633 | 67,241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class D-1 Notes | 6.07910 | % | 575 | 320,199 | 321,188 | 25,454 | 956,887 | 955,418 | 75,315 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,707,969 | $ | 1,719,273 | $ | 111,801 | $ | 5,081,521 | $ | 5,086,180 | $ | 331,278 |
The classes, interest rates, spread over LIBOR, cash paid for interest, stated interest expense and note discount expense of each of the Class A-1, B-1, C-1 and D-1 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, is as follows:
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC | Stated Interest Rate |
LIBOR Spread (basis points) |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Paid for Interest |
Stated Interest Expense |
Note Discount Expense |
Cash Paid for Interest |
Stated Interest Expense |
Note Discount Expense |
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A-1 Notes | 1.98490 | % | 175 | $ | 869,946 | $ | 890,680 | $ | 49,944 | $ | 2,646,961 | $ | 2,646,473 | $ | 148,137 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B-1 Notes | 3.73490 | % | 350 | 186,358 | 190,658 | 13,536 | 566,208 | 566,153 | 40,117 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C-1 Notes | 4.98490 | % | 475 | 286,186 | 292,729 | 22,511 | 869,160 | 869,095 | 66,654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class D-1 Notes | 5.98490 | % | 575 | 313,800 | 320,941 | 25,158 | 952,831 | 952,773 | 74,439 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,656,290 | $ | 1,695,008 | $ | 111,149 | $ | 5,035,160 | $ | 5,034,494 | $ | 329,347 |
The amounts, ratings and interest rates (expressed as a spread to LIBOR) of the Class A-1, B-1, C-1, D-1 and 2012 Subordinated Notes as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
Description | Class A-1 Notes | Class B-1 Notes | Class C-1 Notes | Class D-1 Notes | Subordinated Notes | |||||||||||||||
Type | Senior Secured Floating Rate |
Senior Secured Floating Rate |
Secured Deferrable Floating Rate |
Secured Deferrable Floating Rate |
Subordinated | |||||||||||||||
Amount Outstanding | $ | 176,000,000 | $ | 20,000,000 | $ | 23,000,000 | $ | 21,000,000 | $ | 80,000,000 | ||||||||||
Moodys Rating | Aaa | Aa2 | A2 | Baa2 | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Standard & Poors Rating | AAA | AA | A | BBB | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Interest Rate | LIBOR + 1.75 | % | LIBOR + 3.50 | % | LIBOR + 4.75 | % | LIBOR + 5.75 | % | N/A | |||||||||||
Stated Maturity | August 25, 2023 | August 25, 2023 | August 25, 2023 | August 25, 2023 | August 25, 2023 | |||||||||||||||
Junior Classes | B-1, C-1, D-1 and Subordinated |
C-1, D-1 and Subordinated |
D-1 and Subordinated |
Subordinated | None |
39
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 7. BORROWINGS (continued)
TICC serves as collateral manager to the 2012 Securitization Issuer under a collateral management agreement. TICC is entitled to a deferred fee for its services as collateral manager. The deferred fee is eliminated in consolidation.
Convertible Notes
On September 26, 2012, the Company issued $105.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes and an additional $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes was issued on October 22, 2012 pursuant to the exercise of the initial purchasers option to purchase additional Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.50% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on May 1, 2013. The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of TICCs common stock based on an initial conversion rate of 87.2448 shares of its common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $11.46 per share of common stock. The conversion price for the Convertible Notes will be reduced for quarterly cash dividends paid to common shares to the extent that the quarterly dividend exceeds $0.29 cents per share, subject to adjustment. The Convertible Notes mature on November 1, 2017, unless previously converted in accordance with their terms. TICC does not have the right to redeem the Convertible Notes prior to maturity. The aggregate accrued interest payable on the Convertible Notes at September 30, 2015 was approximately $3.6 million. Deferred debt issuance costs represent fees and other direct incremental costs incurred in connection with the Convertible Notes. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had a deferred debt issuance balance of approximately $1.3 million. This amount is being amortized and is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the term of the Convertible Notes.
The following table sets forth the components of interest expense, effective annualized average interest rates and cash paid for interest of the Convertible Notes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
2017 Convertible Notes | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||
Stated interest expense | $ | 2,156,250 | $ | 2,156,250 | $ | 6,468,750 | $ | 6,468,750 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred issuance costs | 156,028 | 156,028 | 462,997 | 462,997 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 2,312,278 | $ | 2,312,278 | $ | 6,931,747 | $ | 6,931,747 | ||||||||
Effective annualized average interest rate | 7.98 | % | 7.98 | % | 8.06 | % | 8.06 | % | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | | $ | | $ | 4,312,500 | $ | 4,312,500 |
In certain circumstances, the Convertible Notes will be convertible into shares of TICCs common stock at its initial conversion rate (listed below) subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments and the requirements of its indenture, at any time on or prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date. The Company will in certain circumstances increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares.
Convertible Notes | ||||
Conversion premium | 10.00% | |||
Closing stock price | $10.42 | |||
Closing stock price date | September 20, 2012 | |||
Initial conversion price | $11.46 | |||
Initial conversion rate (shares per one thousand dollar principal amount) | 87.2448 | |||
Maturity date | November 1, 2017 |
40
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 7. BORROWINGS (continued)
As of September 30, 2015, the principal amount of the Convertible Notes exceeded the value of the underlying shares multiplied by the per share closing price of the Companys common stock.
The Convertible Notes are TICCs general, unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment with all of TICCs existing and future senior, unsecured indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any of its subordinated indebtedness. As a result, the Convertible Notes will be effectively subordinated to TICCs existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness and structurally subordinated to any existing and future liabilities and other indebtedness of its subsidiaries.
Credit Facility
On October 27, 2014, TICC Funding, a special purpose vehicle and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a revolving credit facility (the Facility) with Citibank, N.A. Subject to certain exceptions, pricing under the Facility is based on the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) for an interest period equal to three months plus a spread of 1.50% per annum. Pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement governing the Facility, TICC Funding has borrowed, on a revolving basis, the maximum aggregate principal amount of $150,000,000. The revolving basis period will end on October 27, 2016 (Reinvestment Period), subject to certain exceptions. Post Reinvestment Period, the Facility has a mandatory amortization schedule such that twenty-five percent (25.0%) and fifty percent (50.0%) of the principal amount outstanding as of October 27, 2016 will be due and payable, on January 18, 2017 and April 18, 2017, respectively, and the remaining principal amount outstanding and accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable, on October 27, 2017. The Company used part of the proceeds from the Facility to redeem all of the $101.25 million of Class A secured notes issued by TICC CLO on August 10, 2011.
The Facility is secured by a pool of loans initially consisting of loans sold by TICC CLO to TICC Funding, loans sold to and contributed by the Company to TICC Funding, and loans purchased by TICC Funding from unaffiliated third parties. The Company may sell and contribute additional loans to TICC Funding from time to time. The Company will act as the collateral manager of the loans owned by TICC Funding, and has retained a residual interest through its ownership of TICC Funding.
As of September 30, 2015, there were 41 investments in portfolio companies with a total fair value of approximately $291.5 million, collateralizing the Facility. The pool of loans in TICC Funding must meet certain requirements, including asset mix and concentration, collateral coverage, term, agency rating, minimum coupon, minimum spread and sector diversity requirements.
The aggregate accrued interest payable on the Facility at September 30, 2015 was approximately $0.7 million. Deferred debt issuance costs represent fees and other direct incremental costs incurred in connection with the Facility. As of September 30, 2015, TICC had a deferred debt issuance costs balance of approximately $0.6 million. This amount is being amortized and included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the term of the Facility.
The following table sets forth the components of interest expense, effective annualized average interest rates and cash paid for interest of the Facility for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015:
Credit Facility | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
||||||
Stated interest expense | $ | 683,752 | $ | 2,014,651 | ||||
Amortization of deferred issuance costs | 117,578 | 348,900 | ||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 801,330 | $ | 2,363,551 | ||||
Effective annualized average interest rate | 2.12 | % | 2.09 | % | ||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 672,699 | $ | 1,807,639 |
41
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 7. BORROWINGS (continued)
Each of TICC CLO, TICC CLO 2012-1 and TICC Funding are consolidated subsidiaries of TICC. The Company consolidated the results of its wholly-owned subsidiaries in its consolidated financial statements as the subsidiaries are operated solely for investment activities of the Company, and the Company has substantial equity at risk. The creditors of TICC CLO, TICC CLO 2012-1 and TICC Funding have received security interests in the assets owned by TICC CLO, TICC CLO 2012-1 and TICC Funding, respectively, and such assets are not intended to be available to the creditors of TICC (or any other affiliate of TICC).
NOTE 8. EARNINGS PER SHARE
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from investment income per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Net investment income(1) | $ | 10,874,618 | $ | 17,520,528 | $ | 34,070,661 | $ | 52,695,296 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic | 59,987,986 | 60,268,078 | 59,997,565 | 58,307,825 | ||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share basic(1) |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.90 | ||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Net investment income, before adjustments(1) | $ | 10,874,618 | $ | 17,520,528 | $ | 34,070,661 | $ | 52,695,296 | ||||||||
Adjustments for interest on convertible senior notes, deferred issuance costs, base management fees and incentive fees(2) | | 1,857,852 | 5,560,729 | 5,571,062 | ||||||||||||
Net investment income, as adjusted(1)(2) | $ | 10,874,618 | $ | 19,378,380 | $ | 39,631,390 | $ | 58,266,358 | ||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic | 59,987,986 | 60,268,078 | 59,997,565 | 58,307,825 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments for dilutive effect of convertible notes(2) | | 10,033,152 | 10,033,152 | 10,033,152 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted(2) | 59,987,986 | 70,301,230 | 70,030,717 | 68,340,977 | ||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share diluted(1) |
$ | 0.18 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.85 |
42
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 8. EARNINGS PER SHARE (continued)
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted net increase in net assets resulting from operations per share for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share basic: |
||||||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations(1) | $ | (29,734,738 | ) | $ | (1,261,925 | ) | $ | 1,121,682 | $ | 25,133,990 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic | 59,987,986 | 60,268,078 | 59,997,565 | 58,307,825 | ||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share basic | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.43 | ||||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations, before adjustments(1) | $ | (29,734,738 | ) | $ | (1,261,925 | ) | $ | 1,121,682 | $ | 25,133,990 | ||||||
Adjustments for interest on convertible senior notes, deferred issuance costs, base management fees and incentive fees(2) | | | | | ||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations, as adjusted(1)(2) | $ | (29,734,738 | ) | $ | (1,261,926 | ) | $ | 1,121,682 | $ | 25,133,990 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding basic | 59,987,986 | 60,268,078 | 59,997,565 | 58,307,825 | ||||||||||||
Adjustments for dilutive effect of convertible notes(2) | | | | | ||||||||||||
Weighted average common shares outstanding diluted(2) | 59,987,986 | 60,268,078 | 59,997,565 | 58,307,825 | ||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share diluted(1) | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.43 |
(1) | During the first quarter of 2015, the Company identified a non-material error in its accounting for income from CLO equity investments refer to Note 3. Change of Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Income. Prospectively as of January 1, 2015, the Company records income from its CLO equity investments using the effective yield method in accordance with the accounting guidance in ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, based upon an estimation of an effective yield to maturity utilizing assumed cash flows. An out-of-period adjustment to net investment income incentive fees, in the amount of $2.4 million, is reflected in the first quarter of 2015. Prior period amounts are not materially affected. |
(2) | Due to the anti-dilutive effect on the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, the adjustments for interest on convertible senior notes, base management fees, deferred issuance costs and incentive fees as well as adjustments for dilutive effect of convertible notes were excluded from the respective periods diluted earnings per share computation. The following table represents the respective adjustments which were not made due to the anti-dilutive effect on the computation of diluted change in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share and the diluted change in net assets resulting from operations per common share for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014: |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Adjustments for interset on convertible senior notes, deferred issuance cost, base management fees and incentive fees | $ | 1,852,432 | | | | |||||||||||
Share adjustments for dilutive effect of convertible notes | 10,033,152 | | | | ||||||||||||
Net (decrease) increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share diluted: |
||||||||||||||||
Adjustments for interset on convertible senior notes, deferred issuance cost, base management fees and incentive fees | $ | 1,852,432 | $ | 1,857,852 | $ | 5,560,729 | $ | 5,571,062 | ||||||||
Share adjustments for dilutive effect of convertible notes | 10,033,152 | 10,033,152 | 10,033,152 | 10,033,152 |
43
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Investment Advisory Fees
The Company has entered into an investment advisory agreement with TICC Management (the Investment Advisory Agreement) under which TICC Management, subject to the overall supervision of TICCs Board of Directors, manages the day-to-day operations of, and provides investment advisory services to, TICC. For providing these services TICC Management receives a fee from TICC, consisting of two components: a base management fee (the Base Fee) and an incentive fee. The Base Fee is calculated at an annual rate of 2.00%. The Base Fee is payable quarterly in arrears, and is calculated based on the average value of TICCs gross assets at the end of the two most recently completed calendar quarters, and appropriately adjusted for any equity or debt capital raises, repurchases or redemptions during the current calendar quarter. Accordingly, the Base Fee will be payable regardless of whether the value of the Companys gross assets have decreased during the quarter.
The following table represents the Base Fee for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||
Investment advisory fee | $ | 5,255,583 | $ | 5,366,277 | $ | 15,574,269 | $ | 15,764,248 |
The investment advisory fee payable to TICC Management as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, was $5,255,583 and $5,385,943, respectively.
Net Investment Income Incentive Fee
The incentive fee has two parts. The first part is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on the Companys Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter. For this purpose, Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means interest income, income from securitization vehicles and equity investments and any other income (including any other fees that TICC receives from portfolio companies) accrued during the calendar quarter, minus the Companys operating expenses for the quarter (including the Base Fee, expenses payable under the Companys administration agreement with BDC Partners (the Administration Agreement), and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee). Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income includes, in the case of investments with a deferred interest feature (such as original issue discount, debt instruments with PIK interest and zero coupon securities), accrued income that the Company has not yet received in cash. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income does not include any realized gains, realized losses or unrealized appreciation or depreciation. Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income, expressed as a rate of return on the value of the Companys net assets at the end of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is compared to one-fourth of an annual hurdle rate. Given that this portion of the incentive fee is payable without regard to any gain, loss or unrealized depreciation that may occur during the quarter, this portion of TICC Managements incentive fee may also be payable notwithstanding a decline in net asset value that quarter.
During the first quarter of 2015, the Company identified a non-material error in its accounting policy for revenue recognition refer to Note 3. Change of Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Income. As a result of this error, because the net investment income incentive fee in prior years was based upon net investment income as previously reported, the net investment income incentive fees were overstated by approximately $2.4 million on a cumulative basis through the year ended 2014. Therefore, a reduction in expenses as well as due from affiliate of approximately $2.4 million was recorded for the quarter ended March 31, 2015, which represents the cumulative indirect effect of the error on the Companys net investment income incentive fees. This reversal of expenses was partially offset by net investment income incentive fees
44
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 of approximately $1.4 million. TICC Management repaid in full to TICC, on April 30, 2015, the portion of its previously paid net investment income incentive fees attributable to the overstated amounts.
For each year commencing on or after January 1, 2005, the annual hurdle rate has been determined as of the immediately preceding December 31st by adding 5.0% to the interest rate then payable on the most recently issued five-year U.S. Treasury Notes, up to a maximum annual hurdle rate of 10.0%. The annual hurdle rates for the 2014, 2013 and 2012 calendar years was 6.75%, 5.72% and 5.83%, respectively. The current hurdle rate for the 2015 calendar year, calculated as of December 31, 2014, is 6.65%.
The following table represents the net investment income incentive fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||
Net investment income incentive fee | $ | 575,319 | $ | 1,701,699 | $ | (929,933 | ) | $ | 4,806,278 |
The net investment income incentive fee payable to TICC Management as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, was approximately $575,319 and $797,543, respectively.
In addition, in the event the Company recognizes payment-in-kind, or PIK, interest income in excess of its available capital, the Company may be required to liquidate assets in order to pay a portion of the incentive fee. TICC Management, however, is not required to reimburse the Company for the portion of any incentive fees attributable to PIK loan interest income in the event of a subsequent default.
Capital Gains Incentive Fees
The second part of the incentive fee is determined and payable in arrears as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement, as of the termination date), and equals 20% of our Incentive Fee Capital Gains, which consist of our realized gains for each calendar year, computed net of all realized losses and unrealized depreciation for that calendar year. For accounting purposes only, in order to reflect the theoretical capital gains incentive fee that would be payable for a given period as if all unrealized gains were realized, we will accrue a capital gains incentive fee based upon net realized gains and unrealized depreciation for that calendar year (in accordance with the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement), plus unrealized appreciation on investments held at the end of the period. It should be noted that a fee so calculated and accrued would not necessarily be payable under the Investment Advisory Agreement, and may never be paid based upon the computation of capital gains incentive fees in subsequent periods. Amounts paid under the Investment Advisory Agreement will be consistent with the formula reflected in the Investment Advisory Agreement.
The amount of capital gains incentive fee expense related to the hypothetical liquidation of the portfolio (and assuming no other changes in realized or unrealized gains and losses) would only become payable to TICC Management in the event of a complete liquidation of our portfolio as of period end and the termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement on such date. Also, it should be noted that the capital gains incentive fee expense fluctuates with our overall investment results.
45
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 9. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (continued)
The following table represents the hypothetical capital gains incentive fees for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||
Capital gains incentive fees | $ | | $ | (837,963 | ) | $ | | $ | (3,872,853 | ) |
There were no accrued capital gains incentive fee payable to TICC Management as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014.
Administration Agreement
The Company has also entered into the Administration Agreement with BDC Partners under which BDC Partners provides administrative services for TICC. The Company pays BDC Partners an allocable portion of overhead and other expenses incurred by BDC Partners in performing its obligations under the Administration Agreement, including a portion of the rent and the compensation of the chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, accounting staff and other administrative support personnel, which creates potential conflicts of interest that the Board of Directors must monitor.
TICC Management is controlled by BDC Partners, its managing member. Charles M. Royce holds a minority, non-controlling interest in TICC Management. BDC Partners manages the business and internal affairs of TICC Management. Jonathan H. Cohen, the Companys Chief Executive Officer, as well as a Director, is the managing member of BDC Partners. Saul B. Rosenthal, the Companys President and Chief Operating Officer, is also the President and Chief Operating Officer of TICC Management and a member of BDC Partners. Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal have an equal equity interest in BDC Partners. Charles M. Royce, the Companys non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors, does not take part in the management or participate in the operations of TICC Management; however, Mr. Royce is expected to be available from time to time to TICC Management to provide certain consulting services without compensation.
For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, TICC incurred $89,660 and $472,903, respectively, in compensation expenses for the services of employees allocated to the administrative activities of TICC, pursuant to the Administration Agreement with BDC Partners; for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, TICC incurred compensation expenses of $965,293 and $1,399,476, respectively. Further, TICC incurred $27,738 and $18,300 for facility costs allocated under the agreement for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively; for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, TICC incurred $82,675 and $54,900, respectively. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, compensation expense payable was $43,100 and $0, respectively, and for the same periods, facility expense payable was $0 and $5,000, respectively.
NOTE 10. DISTRIBUTIONS
The Company intends to continue to operate so as to qualify to be taxed as a RIC under the Code and, as such, the Company would not be subject to federal income tax on the portion of its taxable income and gains distributed to stockholders. To qualify as a RIC, the Company is required, among other requirements, to distribute at least 90% of its annual investment company taxable income, as defined by the Code. The amount to be paid out as a distribution is determined by the Board of Directors each quarter and is based upon the annual taxable income estimated by the management of the Company. Income calculated in accordance with US federal income tax regulations differs substantially from GAAP income. To the extent that the Companys
46
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 10. DISTRIBUTIONS (continued)
taxable earnings fall below the amount of distributions declared, however, a portion of the total amount of the Companys distributions for the fiscal year may be deemed a return of capital for tax purposes to the Companys stockholders.
The Company intends to comply with the applicable provisions of the Code pertaining to regulated investment companies to make distributions of taxable income sufficient to relieve it of substantially all federal income taxes. The Company, at its discretion, may carry forward taxable income in excess of calendar year distributions and pay a 4% excise tax on this income. The Company will accrue excise tax on estimated excess taxable income, if any, as required.
On March 31, 2015, June 30, 2015 and September 30, 2015, the Company paid a distribution of $0.27 per share, $0.29 per share and $0.29 per share, respectively. The Company has a distribution reinvestment plan under which all distributions are paid to stockholders in the form of additional shares issued or purchased in the open market, unless a stockholder elects to receive cash.
NOTE 11. NET ASSET VALUE PER SHARE
The Companys net asset value per share at September 30, 2015 was $7.81, and at December 31, 2014 was $8.64. In determining the Companys net asset value per share, the Board of Directors determined in good faith the fair value of the Companys portfolio investments for which reliable market quotations are not readily available.
NOTE 12. INVESTMENT INCOME
The following tables set forth the components of investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||
Interest income |
||||||||
Stated interest income | $ | 11,812,652 | $ | 12,167,910 | ||||
Original issue discount and market discount income | 2,231,377 | 646,381 | ||||||
Payment-in-kind income | 97,914 | 276,953 | ||||||
Discount income derived from unscheduled remittances at par | 2,389 | 36,543 | ||||||
Total interest income | $ | 14,144,332 | $ | 13,127,787 | ||||
Income from securitization vehicles(1) | $ | 8,617,121 | $ | 15,170,869 | ||||
Commitment, amendment and other fee income |
||||||||
Fee letters | $ | 339,566 | $ | 341,159 | ||||
Success fees on CLO warehouses | | 1,031,360 | ||||||
Loan prepayment and bond call fees | | 225,000 | ||||||
All other fees | 33,369 | 279,548 | ||||||
Total commitment, amendment and other fee income | $ | 372,935 | $ | 1,877,067 | ||||
Total investment income | $ | 23,134,388 | $ | 30,175,723 |
47
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 12. INVESTMENT INCOME (continued)
The following tables set forth the components of investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||
Interest income |
||||||||
Stated interest income | $ | 35,869,821 | $ | 36,223,209 | ||||
Original issue discount and market discount income | 3,741,070 | 2,084,263 | ||||||
Payment-in-kind income | 599,858 | 966,960 | ||||||
Discount income derived from unscheduled remittances at par | 61,700 | 177,708 | ||||||
Total interest income | $ | 40,272,449 | $ | 39,452,140 | ||||
Income from securitization vehicles(1) | $ | 26,396,541 | $ | 45,047,290 | ||||
Commitment, amendment and other fee income |
||||||||
Fee letters | $ | 1,014,381 | $ | 922,754 | ||||
Success fees on CLO warehouses | | 1,031,360 | ||||||
Loan prepayment and bond call fees | 360,000 | 1,763,880 | ||||||
All other fees | 610,925 | 549,885 | ||||||
Total commitment, amendment and other fee income | $ | 1,985,306 | $ | 4,267,879 | ||||
Total investment income | $ | 68,654,296 | $ | 88,767,309 |
(1) | During the first quarter of 2015, the Company identified a non-material error in its accounting policy for revenue recognition refer to Note 3. Change of Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investment Income. |
The 1940 Act requires that a business development company offer managerial assistance to its portfolio companies. The Company may receive fee income for managerial assistance it renders to portfolio companies in connection with its investments. For the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, the Company received no fee income for managerial assistance.
NOTE 13. SHARE REPURCHASE PROGRAM
On December 18, 2014, our board of directors authorized a repurchase program to be in place until the earlier of June 30, 2015 or until $50 million of our outstanding shares of common stock were repurchased. Under the repurchase program, we were able to, but were not obligated to, repurchase our outstanding common stock in the open market from time to time provided that we complied with the prohibitions under our Insider Trading Policies and Procedures and the guidelines specified in Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including certain price, market volume and timing constraints. In addition, repurchases were conducted in accordance with the 1940 Act. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, we repurchased 315,783 shares at the weighted average price of approximately $7.56 per share, inclusive of commissions. This represents a discount of approximately 13.3% of the net asset value per share at March 31, 2015. The total dollar amount of shares repurchased in this program was approximately $2.4 million, through the programs expiration on June 30, 2015. No shares were repurchased during the three months ended September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the Company did not have an active share repurchase program.
48
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 14. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
In the normal course of business, the Company enters into a variety of undertakings containing a variety of warranties and indemnifications that may expose the Company to some risk of loss. The risk of future loss arising from such undertakings, while not quantifiable, is expected to be remote.
As of September 30, 2015, the Company had commitments to purchase additional debt investments of approximately $21.0 million.
We are currently subject to litigation arising out of the Transaction (as defined in Note 19. Potential Sale of Companys Investment Advisor). In the opinion of management, none of these lawsuits or claims against us, either individually or in the aggregate, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, or financial condition. In addition, we believe we have adequate insurance in place to cover such litigation.
NOTE 15. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS
Financial highlights for the three and nine months ending September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, are as follows:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 (unaudited) |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 (unaudited) |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
|||||||||||||
Per Share Data |
||||||||||||||||
Net asset value at beginning of period | $ | 8.60 | $ | 9.71 | $ | 8.64 | $ | 9.85 | ||||||||
Net investment income(1)(3) | 0.18 | 0.29 | 0.57 | 0.90 | ||||||||||||
Net realized and unrealized capital losses(2)(3) | (0.68 | ) | (0.31 | ) | (0.56 | ) | (0.47 | ) | ||||||||
Net change in net asset value from operations | (0.50 | ) | (0.02 | ) | 0.01 | 0.43 | ||||||||||
Distributions per share from net investment income | (0.29 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (0.85 | ) | (0.87 | ) | ||||||||
Distributions based on weighted average share impact | | | | (0.01 | ) | |||||||||||
Total distributions(4) | (0.29 | ) | (0.29 | ) | (0.85 | ) | (0.88 | ) | ||||||||
Effect of shares repurchased, gross | | | 0.01 | | ||||||||||||
Net asset value at end of period | $ | 7.81 | $ | 9.40 | $ | 7.81 | $ | 9.40 | ||||||||
Per share market value at beginning of period | $ | 6.72 | $ | 9.90 | $ | 7.53 | $ | 10.34 | ||||||||
Per share market value at end of period | $ | 6.71 | $ | 8.83 | $ | 6.71 | $ | 8.83 | ||||||||
Total return(5) | 4.17 | % | (7.88 | )% | 0.60 | % | (6.52 | )% | ||||||||
Shares outstanding at end of period | 59,987,986 | 60,357,746 | 59,987,986 | 60,357,746 | ||||||||||||
Ratios/Supplemental Data |
||||||||||||||||
Net assets at end of period (000s) | $ | 468,559 | $ | 567,252 | $ | 468,559 | $ | 567,252 | ||||||||
Average net assets (000s) | $ | 492,124 | $ | 576,241 | $ | 510,712 | $ | 565,430 | ||||||||
Ratio of expenses to average net assets(6) | 9.97 | % | 8.79 | % | 9.03 | % | 8.51 | % | ||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets(6) | 8.84 | % | 12.16 | % | 8.90 | % | 12.43 | % |
(1) | Represents per share net investment income for the period, based upon average shares outstanding. |
(2) | Net realized and unrealized capital gains include rounding adjustments to reconcile change in net asset value per share. |
49
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 15. FINANCIAL HIGHLIGHTS (continued)
(3) | During the first quarter of 2015, the Company identified a non-material error in its accounting for income from CLO equity investments refer to Note 3. Change of Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Income. Prospectively as of January 1, 2015, the Company records income from its CLO equity investments using the effective yield method in accordance with the accounting guidance in ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, based upon an estimation of an effective yield to maturity utilizing assumed cash flows. An out-of-period adjustment to net investment income incentive fees, in the amount of $2.4 million, is reflected in the first quarter of 2015. Prior period amounts are not materially affected. |
(4) | Management monitors available taxable earnings, including net investment income and realized capital gains, to determine if a tax return of capital may occur for the year. To the extent the Companys taxable earnings fall below the total amount of the Companys distributions for that fiscal year, a portion of those distributions may be deemed a tax return of capital to the Companys stockholders. The tax character of distributions will be determined at the end of the fiscal year. |
(5) | Total return equals the increase or decrease of ending market value over beginning market value, plus distributions, divided by the beginning market value, assuming distribution reinvestment prices obtained under the Companys distribution reinvestment plan, excluding any discounts. Total return is not annualized. |
(6) | Annualized. |
(7) | The following table provides supplemental performance ratios (annualized) measured for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014: |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 (unaudited) |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 (unaudited) |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 (unaudited) |
|||||||||||||
Ratio of expenses before incentive fees to average net assets | 9.50 | % | 8.19 | % | 9.27 | % | 8.29 | % | ||||||||
Ratio of net investment income incentive fees to average net assets | 0.47 | % | 1.18 | % | (0.24 | )% | 1.13 | % | ||||||||
Ratio of capital gains incentive fees to average net assets | | (0.58 | )% | | (0.91 | )% | ||||||||||
Ratio of expenses, excluding interest expense, to average net assets | 5.88 | % | 5.33 | % | 5.12 | % | 5.02 | % |
NOTE 16. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
On February 18, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-02, which updated consolidation standards under ASC Topic 810, Consolidation. Under this update, a new consolidation analysis is required for variable interest entities (VIEs) and will limit the circumstances in which investment managers and similar entities are required to consolidate the entities that they manage. The FASB decided to eliminate some of the criteria under which their fees are considered a variable interest and limit the circumstances in which variable interests in a VIE held by related parties of a reporting enterprise require the reporting enterprise to consolidate the VIE. The guidance is effective for public business entities for annual and interim periods in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. The Company is assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-2 on its financial statements.
50
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 16. RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS (continued)
On April 7, 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-03, Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs, which requires debt issuance costs to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying value of the associated debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early adoption of the amendments in this update is permitted for financial statements that have not been previously issued. The Company is assessing the impact of the adoption of ASU 2015-03 on its financial statements.
In May 2015, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2015-07, Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820): Disclosures for Investments in Certain Entities That Calculate Net Asset Value per Share (or Its Equivalent). Under the amendments in this Update, investments for which fair value is measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) using the practical expedient should not be categorized in the fair value hierarchy. Removing those investments from the fair value hierarchy not only eliminates the diversity in practice resulting from the way in which investments measured at net asset value per share (or its equivalent) with future redemption dates are classified, but also ensures that all investments categorized in the fair value hierarchy are classified using a consistent approach. Investments that calculate net asset value per share (or its equivalent), but for which the practical expedient is not applied will continue to be included in the fair value hierarchy. ASU 2015-07 is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is assessing the impact of adoption of ASU 2015-07 on its financial statements.
NOTE 17. CONCENTRATION OF CREDIT RISK
The Company places its cash and cash equivalents with financial institutions and, at times, cash held in checking accounts may exceed the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation insured limit. In addition, the Companys portfolio may be concentrated in a limited number of portfolio companies, which will subject the Company to a risk of significant loss if any of these companies defaults on its obligations under any of its debt securities that the Company holds or if those sectors experience a market downturn.
NOTE 18. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES
The U.S. capital markets have recently experienced periods of extreme volatility and disruption. Disruptions in the capital markets tend to increase the spread between the yields realized on risk-free and higher risk securities, resulting in illiquidity in parts of the capital markets. The Company believes these conditions may reoccur in the future. A prolonged period of market illiquidity may have an adverse effect on the Companys business, financial condition and results of operations. Adverse economic conditions could also increase the Companys funding costs, limit the Companys access to the capital markets or result in a decision by lenders not to extend credit to the Company. These events could limit the Companys investment originations, limit the Companys ability to grow and negatively impact the Companys operating results.
Many of the companies in which the Company has made or will make investments may be susceptible to adverse economic conditions, which may affect the ability of a company to repay TICCs loans or engage in a liquidity event such as a sale, recapitalization, or initial public offering. Therefore, the Companys nonperforming assets may increase, and the value of the Companys portfolio may decrease during this period. Adverse economic conditions also may decrease the value of any collateral securing some of the Companys loans and the value of its equity investments. Adverse economic conditions could lead to financial losses in the Companys portfolio and a decrease in its revenues, net income, and the value of the Companys assets.
51
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 18. RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES (continued)
A portfolio companys failure to satisfy financial or operating covenants imposed by the Company or other lenders could lead to defaults and, potentially, termination of the portfolio companys loans and foreclosure on its secured assets, which could trigger cross-defaults under other agreements and jeopardize the portfolio companys ability to meet its obligations under the debt securities that the Company holds. The Company may incur expenses to the extent necessary to seek recovery upon default or to negotiate new terms with a defaulting portfolio company. In addition, if a portfolio company goes bankrupt, even though the Company may have structured its investment as senior debt or secured debt, depending on the facts and circumstances, including the extent to which the Company actually provided significant managerial assistance, if any, to that portfolio company, a bankruptcy court might re-characterize the Companys debt holding and subordinate all or a portion of the Companys claim to that of other creditors. These events could harm the Companys financial condition and operating results.
As a business development company, the Company is required to carry its investments at market value or, if no market value is ascertainable, at fair value as determined in good faith by or under the direction of its Board of Directors. Decreases in the market values or fair values of the Companys investments are recorded as unrealized depreciation. Depending on market conditions, the Company could incur substantial losses in future periods, which could have a material adverse impact on its business, financial condition and results of operations.
The owners of TICC Management have entered into a purchase agreement to sell a controlling interest in TICC Management to another party. The closing of this transaction is subject to certain closing conditions. See Note 19. Potential Sale of the Company's Investment Advisor for additional information.
NOTE 19. POTENTIAL SALE OF COMPANYS INVESTMENT ADVISOR
Messrs. Jonathan H. Cohen, Saul B. Rosenthal and Charles M. Royce, or their respective affiliates (collectively, the Sellers) own and/or control all of the issued and outstanding limited liability company membership interests of TICC Management, LLC (the Adviser). On August 3, 2015, the Sellers entered into a purchase agreement with an affiliate of Benefit Street Partners L.L.C. (BSP), pursuant to which BSP would acquire control of the Adviser (the Transaction). The Transaction would result in a change in control of the Adviser, and as a result, an assignment and subsequent termination of the current investment advisory agreement, dated July 1, 2011, between the Company and the Adviser in accordance with the 1940 Act.
On September 3, 2015, the Company filed a proxy statement (the Proxy Statement) in connection with a special meeting of the Companys stockholders (the Special Meeting), at which the stockholders of the Company will be asked to approve a new investment advisory agreement between the Company and TICC Management (the New Advisory Agreement) among other proposals. The Companys Board of Directors (the Board), including a majority of non-interested directors, has approved the New Advisory Agreement and believes it to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If approved by the required majority of the Companys stockholders, the New Advisory Agreement will become effective upon the closing of the Transaction, which is expected to occur as soon as practicable following the Special Meeting.
On August 11, 2015, NexPoint Advisers, L.P. (NexPoint) delivered to the Board an unsolicited proposal to act as the Companys new investment adviser. On September 23, 2015, NexPoint filed Form PREC 14A, a preliminary solicitation of proxies in opposition of the New Advisory Agreement and the Companys other proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting, and proposed a slate of six director nominees for consideration at the Special Meeting.
On September 10, 2015, TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (TPG) delivered to the Special Committee a proposal to acquire TICC Capital Corp. in a stock-for-stock transaction. The proposal stated that TPG intended
52
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 19. POTENTIAL SALE OF COMPANYS INVESTMENT ADVISOR (continued)
to offer TICC stockholders a number of shares in TPG common stock that results in TICC stockholders receiving $7.50 in value per share as of the signing date of a definitive agreement. On September 18, 2015, TPG filed a Form PREC 14A, a preliminary solicitation of proxies in opposition of the New Advisory Agreement and the Companys other proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting.
The special committee of the Companys non-interested directors and the Board of Directors determined to continue to recommend the New Advisory Agreement to the Companys stockholders.
Since September 3, 2015, the Company has filed additional soliciting materials with the SEC and also filed on October 27, 2015, a supplement containing proposed court ordered disclosures regarding the Transaction. See Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies for additional discussion regarding litigation arising out of the Transaction. Also see Note 20. Subsequent Events for developments relating to the Transaction and the Special Meeting subsequent to September 30, 2015.
NOTE 20. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Distributions
On November 2, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a distribution of $0.29 per share for the fourth quarter, payable on December 31, 2015 to shareholders of record as of December 16, 2015.
Potential Sale of the Companys Investment Adviser
Subsequent to the end of the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2015, there have been additional developments in connection with the Transaction and the Special Meeting.
On October 5, 2015, TPG filed a Form DEFC 14A, a definitive solicitation of proxies in opposition to the New Advisory Agreement and other proposals to be voted on at the Special meeting.
On October 7, 2015, BSP announced its intention to support a tender offer or share repurchase program of between $50 million and $100 million, with the tender offer to be funded by BSP, if the Transaction closes.
On October 8, 2015, NexPoint brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (the Court) against the Company, the Companys Board of Directors and the Companys President. NexPoints complaint alleged that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, breached the fiduciary duty of candor under Maryland law, and breached the Companys Bylaws by failing to recognize NexPoints director nominees. NexPoint sought (i) a temporary restraining order prohibiting the Company from canceling or rescheduling its October 27, 2015 Special Meeting or altering the size or composition of the Board of Directors and (ii) a preliminary injunction requiring the Company to issue additional disclosures and recognize NexPoints six director nominees.
On October 8, 2015, the Court issued a temporary restraining order pending a hearing on NexPoints preliminary injunction motion, which was held on October 16, 2015.
On October 9, 2015, NexPoint filed a Form DEFC 14A, a definitive solicitation of proxies in opposition to the New Advisory Agreement and the Companys other proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting, and proposed a slate of six director nominees for consideration at the Special Meeting.
On October 23, 2015, the Court denied NexPoints preliminary injunction motion insofar as it sought to require the Company to recognize NexPoints director nominees, and granted it in part with respect to certain of NexPoints disclosure claims. The Court ordered (the Order) the Company to correct certain statements made in prior proxy materials and to provide certain additional disclosures. The Order set a schedule for the defendants to file a draft of corrective proxy materials with the Court, for NexPoint to state its agreement or any objections to those proposed disclosures, and for the Court to resolve any disputes and then set (a) a date
53
TICC CAPITAL CORP.
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
SEPTEMBER 30, 2015
(unaudited)
NOTE 20. SUBSEQUENT EVENTS (continued)
by which defendants must file and mail to the Companys stockholders the finalized corrective proxy materials, and (b) the earliest date on which the Company may hold the Special Meeting.
On October 26, 2015, NexPoint filed a motion seeking reconsideration of the Order. Defendants filed an opposition to NexPoints motion for reconsideration on November 3, 2015 and NexPoint filed a reply brief on November 6, 2015.
On October 27, 2015, defendants filed draft corrective proxy materials with the Court and made them available to the Companys stockholders. On November 3, 2015, NexPoint filed their proposed corrective proxy materials for the Company with the Court, and on November 4, 2015, defendants responded to NexPoints objections to the corrective proxy materials that defendants proposed.
On November 9, 2015, the Court scheduled a hearing for November 13, 2015 to address NexPoint's motion for reconsideration and the proposed corrective disclosures submitted by the Company and NexPoint.
On October 27, 2015, two stockholders of the Company filed a putative class action complaint in the Court against the Company, the Board, and the Companys President. Plaintiffs complaint alleged that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and breached the fiduciary duty of candor under Maryland law. The complaint sought (i) an injunction requiring the defendants to hold the Special Meeting only after corrective information has been disseminated to the Companys stockholders, and (ii) an injunction requiring the defendants to issue additional corrective proxy materials. On November 3, these purported stockholders filed proposed corrective proxy materials in the NexPoint lawsuit where they are not a party. Defendants addressed plaintiffs filing in their November 4, 2015 response to NexPoints objections noted above.
On October 27, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Raging Capital Master Fund, LTD, Raging Capital Management, LLC, and William C. Martin (the Raging Capital Group) under which the Raging Capital Group agreed to vote all of its shares in favor of all TICC proposals at the Special Meeting, including voting for the New Advisory Agreement and for the election of the six new directors named in TICCs Proxy Statement. The Raging Capital Group is TICCs largest stockholder as of the record date for the Special Meeting. TICC also agreed that if TICCs proposals are approved at the Special Meeting, it will appoint an additional independent director, recommended by the Raging Capital Group, to the TICC Board. If TICCs proposals are approved at the Special Meeting, this agreement would expand the number of independent directors on the TICC Board to eight.
In addition, on October 27, 2015, BSP agreed to further reduce the total fees to be paid by TICC under the New Advisory Agreement by waiving 0.25% of its 1.50% annual management fee for a period of twenty-four months after the closing of the Transaction while the portfolio is being transitioned.
See the proxy materials filed by the Company, NexPoint, and TPG since September 3, 2015 for more information about the Transaction and the Special Meeting.
Share Repurchase Program
On November 5, 2015, the Company's Board of Directors authorized a new program for the purpose of repurchasing up to $75 million worth of the Company's common stock. Under the new repurchase program, the Company may, but is not obligated to, repurchase its outstanding common stock in the open market from time to time through June 30, 2016.
54
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements that involve substantial risks and uncertainties. These forward-looking statements are not historical facts, but rather are based on current expectations, estimates and projections about TICC Capital Corp., our current and prospective portfolio investments, our industry, our beliefs, and our assumptions. Words such as anticipates, expects, intends, plans, will, may, continue, believes, seeks, estimates, would, could, should, targets, projects, and variations of these words and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. The forward-looking statements contained in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q involve risks and uncertainties, including statements as to:
| our future operating results; |
| our business prospects and the prospects of our portfolio companies; |
| the impact of investments that we expect to make; |
| our contractual arrangements and relationships with third parties; |
| the dependence of our future success on the general economy and its impact on the industries in which we invest; |
| the ability of our portfolio companies to achieve their objectives; |
| our expected financings and investments; |
| the adequacy of our cash resources and working capital; and |
| the timing of cash flows, if any, from the operations of our portfolio companies. |
These statements are not guarantees of future performance and are subject to risks, uncertainties, and other factors, some of which are beyond our control and difficult to predict and could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or forecasted in the forward-looking statements, including without limitation:
| an economic downturn could impair our portfolio companies ability to continue to operate, which could lead to the loss of some or all of our investments in such portfolio companies; |
| a contraction of available credit and/or an inability to access the equity markets could impair our lending and investment activities; |
| interest rate volatility could adversely affect our results, particularly because we use leverage as part of our investment strategy; |
| currency fluctuations could adversely affect the results of our investments in foreign companies, particularly to the extent that we receive payments denominated in foreign currency rather than U.S. dollars; and |
| the risks, uncertainties and other factors we identify in Item 1A. Risk Factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014, elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in our other filings with the SEC. |
Although we believe that the assumptions on which these forward-looking statements are based are reasonable, any of those assumptions could prove to be inaccurate, and as a result, the forward-looking statements based on those assumptions also could be inaccurate. Important assumptions include our ability to originate new loans and investments, certain margins and levels of profitability and the availability of additional capital. In light of these and other uncertainties, the inclusion of a projection or forward-looking statement in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q should not be regarded as a representation by us that our plans and objectives will be achieved. These risks and uncertainties include those described or identified in Item 1A. Risk Factors contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
55
2014, and elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. You should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which apply only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
Except where the context requires otherwise, the terms TICC, Company, we, us and our refer to TICC Capital Corp. together with its subsidiaries, TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC (2012 Securitization Issuer or TICC CLO 2012-1), and TICC Funding, LLC (TICC Funding); TICC Management refers to TICC Management, LLC; and BDC Partners refers to BDC Partners, LLC.
The following analysis of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements and the related notes thereto contained elsewhere in this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.
OVERVIEW
Our investment objective is to maximize our portfolios total return. Our primary focus is to seek current income by investing in corporate debt securities. We have also invested and may continue to invest in structured finance investments, including collateralized loan obligation (CLO) vehicles, which own debt securities. We may also invest in publicly traded debt and/or equity securities. We operate as a closed-end, non-diversified management investment company and have elected to be treated as a business development company under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended (the 1940 Act). We have elected to be treated for tax purposes as a regulated investment company (RIC), under the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), beginning with our 2003 taxable year.
Our investment activities are managed by TICC Management, a registered investment adviser under the Investment Advisers Act of 1940, as amended. TICC Management is owned by BDC Partners, its managing member, and Charles M. Royce, our non-executive Chairman, who holds a minority, non-controlling interest in TICC Management. Jonathan H. Cohen, our Chief Executive Officer, and Saul B. Rosenthal, our President and Chief Operating Officer, are the controlling members of BDC Partners. Under an investment advisory agreement (the Investment Advisory Agreement), we have agreed to pay TICC Management an annual base fee calculated on gross assets, and an incentive fee based upon our performance. Under an amended and restated administration agreement (the Administration Agreement), we have agreed to pay or reimburse BDC Partners, as administrator, for certain expenses incurred in operating TICC. Our executive officers and directors, and the executive officers of TICC Management and BDC Partners, serve or may serve as officers and directors of entities that operate in a line of business similar to our own. Accordingly, they may have obligations to investors in those entities, the fulfillment of which might not be in the best interests of us or our stockholders.
We generally expect to invest between $5 million and $50 million in each of our portfolio companies, although this investment size may vary proportionately as the size of our capital base changes and market conditions warrant, and accrue interest at fixed or variable rates. We expect that our investment portfolio will be diversified among a large number of investments with few investments, if any, exceeding 5% of the total portfolio. As of September 30, 2015, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 4.00% and 15.00% and maturity dates of between 6 and 100 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 7.2%.
We have historically borrowed funds to make investments and may continue to borrow funds to make investments. As a result, we are exposed to the risks of leverage, which may be considered a speculative investment technique. Borrowings, also known as leverage, magnify the potential for gain and loss on amounts invested and therefore increase the risks associated with investing in our securities. In addition, the costs associated with our borrowings, including any increase in the management fee payable to TICC Management, will be borne by our common stockholders.
In addition, as a BDC under the 1940 Act, we are required to make available significant managerial assistance, for which we may receive fees, to our portfolio companies. These fees would be generally non-recurring, however in some instances they may have a recurring component. We have received no fee income for managerial assistance to date.
56
Prior to making an investment, we may enter into a non-binding term sheet with the potential portfolio company. These term sheets are generally subject to a number of conditions, including but not limited to the satisfactory completion of our due diligence investigations of the companys business and legal documentation for the loan.
To the extent possible, we will generally seek to invest in loans that are collateralized by a security interest in the borrowers assets or guaranteed by a principal to the transaction. Interest payments, if not deferred, are normally payable quarterly with most debt investments having scheduled principal payments on a monthly or quarterly basis. When we receive a warrant to purchase stock in a portfolio company, the warrant will typically have a nominal strike price, and will entitle us to purchase a modest percentage of the borrowers stock.
Potential Sale of Companys Investment Advisor
Messrs. Jonathan H. Cohen, Saul B. Rosenthal and Charles M. Royce, or their respective affiliates (collectively, the Sellers) own and/or control all of the issued and outstanding limited liability company membership interests of TICC Management, LLC (the Adviser). On August 3, 2015, the Sellers entered into a purchase agreement with an affiliate of Benefit Street Partners L.L.C. (BSP), pursuant to which BSP would acquire control of the Adviser (the Transaction). The Transaction would result in a change in control of the Adviser, and as a result, an assignment and subsequent termination of the current investment advisory agreement, dated July 1, 2011, between the Company and the Adviser in accordance with the 1940 Act.
On September 3, 2015, the Company filed a proxy statement (the Proxy Statement) in connection with a special meeting of the Companys stockholders (the Special Meeting), at which the stockholders of the Company will be asked to approve a new investment advisory agreement between the Company and TICC Management (the New Advisory Agreement) among other proposals. The Companys Board of Directors (the Board), including a majority of non-interested directors, has approved the New Advisory Agreement and believes it to be in the best interests of the Company and its stockholders. If approved by the required majority of the Companys stockholders, the New Advisory Agreement will become effective upon the closing of the Transaction, which is expected to occur as soon as practicable following the Special Meeting.
On August 11, 2015, NexPoint Advisers, L.P. (NexPoint) delivered to the Board an unsolicited proposal to act as the Companys new investment adviser. On September 23, 2015, NexPoint filed Form PREC 14A, a preliminary solicitation of proxies in opposition of the New Advisory Agreement and the Companys other proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting, and proposed a slate of six director nominees for consideration at the Special Meeting.
On September 10, 2015, TPG Specialty Lending, Inc. (TPG) delivered to the Special Committee a proposal to acquire TICC Capital Corp. in a stock-for-stock transaction. The proposal stated that TPG intended to offer TICC stockholders a number of shares in TPG common stock that results in TICC stockholders receiving $7.50 in value per share as of the signing date of a definitive agreement. On September 18, 2015, TPG filed a Form PREC 14A, a preliminary solicitation of proxies in opposition of the New Advisory Agreement and the Companys other proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting.
The special committee of the Companys non-interested directors and the Board of Directors determined to continue to recommend the New Advisory Agreement to the Companys stockholders.
Since September 3, 2015, the Company has filed additional soliciting materials with the SEC and also filed on October 27, 2015, a supplement containing proposed court ordered disclosures regarding the Transaction. See Note 14. Commitments and Contingencies in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for additional discussion regarding litigation arising out of the Transaction. Also see Note 20. Subsequent Events in the notes to our consolidated financial statements for developments relating to the Transaction and the Special Meeting subsequent to September 30, 2015.
57
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING POLICIES
The preparation of financial statements and related disclosures in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements, and revenues and expenses during the periods reported. Actual results could materially differ from those estimates. We have identified investment valuation and revenue recognition as critical accounting policies.
INVESTMENT VALUATION
The Company fair values its investment portfolio in accordance with the provisions of ASC 820, Fair Value Measurement and Disclosure. Estimates made in the preparation of TICCs consolidated financial statements include the valuation of investments and the related amounts of unrealized appreciation and depreciation of investments recorded. TICC believes that there is no single definitive method for determining fair value in good faith. As a result, determining fair value requires that judgment be applied to the specific facts and circumstances of each portfolio investment while employing a consistently applied valuation process for the types of investments TICC makes.
ASC 820-10 clarified the definition of fair value and requires companies to expand their disclosure about the use of fair value to measure assets and liabilities in interim and annual periods subsequent to initial recognition. ASC 820-10 defines fair value as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. ASC 820-10 also establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value. These tiers include: Level 1, defined as observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets; Level 2, which includes inputs such as quoted prices for similar securities in active markets and quoted prices for identical securities in markets that are not active; and Level 3, defined as unobservable inputs for which little or no market data exists, therefore requiring an entity to develop its own assumptions. TICC considers the attributes of current market conditions on an on-going basis and has determined that due to the general illiquidity of the market for its investment portfolio, whereby little or no market data exists, almost all of TICCs investments are based upon Level 3 inputs as of September 30, 2015.
TICCs Board of Directors determines the value of its investment portfolio each quarter. In connection with that determination, members of TICC Managements portfolio management team prepare a quarterly analysis of each portfolio investment using the most recent portfolio company financial statements, forecasts and other relevant financial and operational information. Since March 2004, TICC has engaged third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing certain of its syndicated loans and bilateral investments, including related equity investments, although TICCs Board of Directors ultimately determines the appropriate valuation of each such investment. Changes in fair value, as described above, are recorded in the statement of operations as net change in unrealized appreciation or depreciation.
Syndicated Loans
In accordance with ASC 820-10-35, TICCs valuation procedures specifically provide for the review of indicative quotes supplied by the large agent banks that make a market for each security. However, the marketplace from which TICC obtains indicative bid quotes for purposes of determining the fair value of its syndicated loan investments has shown attributes of illiquidity as described by ASC 820-10-35. During such periods of illiquidity, when TICC believes that the non-binding indicative bids received from agent banks for certain syndicated investments that we own may not be determinative of their fair value or when no market indicative quote is available, TICC may engage third-party valuation firms to provide assistance in valuing certain syndicated investments that TICC owns. In addition, TICC Management prepares an analysis of each syndicated loan, financial summary, covenant compliance review, recent trading activity in the security, if known, and other business developments related to the portfolio company. All available information, including non-binding indicative bids which may not be determinative of fair value, is presented to the Valuation Committee to consider in its determination of fair value. In some instances, there may be limited trading activity in a security even though the market for the security is considered not active. In such cases the Valuation Committee will consider the number of trades, the size and timing of each trade, and other circumstances around such trades, to the extent such information is available, in its determination of fair
58
value. The Valuation Committee will evaluate the impact of such additional information, and factor it into its consideration of the fair value that is indicated by the analysis provided by third-party valuation firms, if any.
Collateralized Loan Obligations Debt and Equity
During the past several years, TICC has acquired a number of debt and equity positions in CLO investment vehicles and more recently CLO warehouse investments. These investments are special purpose financing vehicles. In valuing such investments, TICC considers the indicative prices provided by a recognized industry pricing service as a primary source, and the implied yield of such prices, supplemented by actual trades executed in the market at or around period-end, as well as the indicative prices provided by the broker who arranges transactions in such investment vehicles. TICC also considers those instances in which the record date for an equity distribution payment falls on the last day of the period, and the likelihood that a prospective purchaser would require a downward adjustment to the indicative price representing substantially all of the pending distribution. Additional factors include any available information on other relevant transactions including firm bids and offers in the market and information resulting from bids-wanted- in-competition. In addition, TICC considers the operating metrics of the specific investment vehicle, including compliance with collateralization tests, defaulted and restructured securities, and payment defaults, if any. TICC Management or the Valuation Committee may request an additional analysis by a third-party firm to assist in the valuation process of CLO investment vehicles. All information is presented to TICCs Board of Directors for its determination of fair value of these investments.
Bilateral Investments (Including Equity)
Bilateral investments for which market quotations are readily available are valued by an independent pricing agent or market maker. If such market quotations are not readily available, under the valuation procedures approved by TICCs Board of Directors, upon the recommendation of the Valuation Committee, a third-party valuation firm will prepare valuations for each of TICCs bilateral investments that, when combined with all other investments in the same portfolio company, (i) have a value as of the previous quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of its total assets as of the previous quarter, and (ii) have a value as of the current quarter of greater than or equal to 2.5% of its total assets as of the previous quarter, after taking into account any repayment of principal during the current quarter. In addition, in those instances where a third-party valuation is prepared for a portfolio investment which meets the parameters noted in (i) and (ii) above, the frequency of those third-party valuations is based upon the grade assigned to each such security under its credit grading system as follows: Grade 1, at least annually; Grade 2, at least semi-annually; Grades 3, 4, and 5, at least quarterly. Bilateral investments which do not meet the parameters in (i) and (ii) above are not required to have a third-party valuation and, in those instances, a valuation analysis will be prepared by TICC Management. TICC Management also retains the authority to seek, on TICCs behalf, additional third party valuations with respect to both TICCs bilateral portfolio securities and TICCs syndicated loan investments. TICCs Board of Directors retains ultimate authority as to the third-party review cycle as well as the appropriate valuation of each investment.
INVESTMENT INCOME
Interest Income
Interest income is recorded on an accrual basis using the contractual rate applicable to each debt investment and includes the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums. Discounts from and premiums to par value on securities purchased are accreted/amortized into interest income over the life of the respective security using the effective yield method. The amortized cost of investments represents the original cost adjusted for the accretion of discounts and amortization of premiums, if any.
Generally, when interest and/or principal payments on a loan become past due, or if the Company otherwise does not expect the borrower to be able to service its debt and other obligations, the Company will place the loan on non-accrual status and will generally cease recognizing interest income on that loan for financial reporting purposes until all principal and interest have been brought current through payment or due to restructuring such that the interest income is deemed to be collectible. The Company generally restores non-accrual loans to accrual status when past due principal and interest is paid and, in the Companys judgment, is likely to remain current. As of September 30, 2015, the Company held no non-accrual assets in
59
its portfolio; as of September 30, 2014, the Companys investment in Unitek Global Services, Inc.s senior secured notes was on non-accrual status.
In addition, the Company earns income from the discount on debt securities it purchases, including original issue discount (OID) and market discount. Original issue discount and market discounts are capitalized and amortized into income using the interest method, as applicable.
Income from Securitization Vehicles and Equity Investments
Income from investments in the equity class securities of CLO vehicles (typically income notes or subordinated notes) is recorded using the effective interest method in accordance with the provisions of ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, based upon an estimation of an effective yield to maturity utilizing assumed cash flows, including those CLO equity investments that have not made their inaugural distribution for the relevant period end. The Company monitors the expected residual payments, and effective yield is determined and updated periodically, as needed. Accordingly, investment income recognized on CLO equity securities in the GAAP statement of operations differs from both the tax-basis investment income and from the cash distributions actually received by the Company during the period.
Payment-In-Kind
TICC has investments in its portfolio which contain a contractual payment-in-kind (PIK) provision. Certain PIK investments offer issuers the option at each payment date of making payments in cash or additional securities. PIK interest computed at the contractual rate is accrued into income and added to the principal balance on the capitalization date. Upon capitalization, PIK is subject to the fair value estimates associated with their related investments. PIK investments on non-accrual status are restored to accrual status once it becomes probable that PIK will be realized. To maintain its status as a RIC, this income must be paid out to stockholders in the form of dividends, even though TICC has not collected any cash. Amounts necessary to pay these dividends may come from available cash or the liquidation of certain investments.
Other Income
Other income includes distributions from fee letters, closing or origination fees, and success fees associated with portfolio investments. Distributions from fee letters are an enhancement to the return on a CLO equity investment and are based upon a percentage of the collateral managers fees, and are recorded as other income when earned. Closing or origination fees, if any, are normally paid at closing of an investment, are fully earned and non-refundable, and generally are non-recurring. The Company may also earn success fees associated with its investments in certain securitization vehicles or CLO warehouse facilities, which are contingent upon a take-out of the warehouse by a permanent CLO structure; such fees are earned and recognized when the take-out is completed.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
See Note 16 to our consolidated financial statements for a description of recent accounting pronouncements, including the impact on our consolidated financial statements.
60
PORTFOLIO COMPOSITION AND INVESTMENT ACTIVITY
The total fair value of our investment portfolio was approximately $927.2 million and $984.2 million as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. The decrease in the value of investments during the nine month period ended September 30, 2015, was due primarily to debt repayments and sales of securities totaling approximately $268.8 million and net unrealized depreciation on our investment portfolio of approximately $30.8 million, partially offset by purchases of investments of approximately $214.1 million and discount accretion of $30.1 million.
During the quarter ended September 30, 2015, we closed approximately $66.3 million in portfolio investments, including additional investments of approximately $29.5 million in existing portfolio companies and approximately $36.8 million in new portfolio companies. For the year ended December 31, 2014, we had closed approximately $556.7 million in portfolio investments, including additional investments of approximately $203.7 million in existing portfolio companies and approximately $353.0 million in new portfolio companies.
In certain instances, we receive payments based on scheduled amortization of the outstanding balances and sales of portfolio investments. In addition, we receive repayments of some of our debt investments prior to their scheduled maturity date. The frequency or volume of these repayments may fluctuate significantly from period to period. For the quarter ended September 30, 2015, we did not recognize any proceeds from sales whereas, for the year ended December 31, 2014, we recognized proceeds of approximately $127.5 million from the sales of securities. Also, during the quarter ended September 30, 2015, we had repayments and amortization payments of approximately $65.3 million (including reductions to investment cost value of approximately $18.3 million associated with the effective yield accounting methodology), whereas, for the year ended December 31, 2014, we had repayments and amortization payments of approximately $311.9 million.
As of September 30, 2015, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, 50 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately $683.2 million, and equity investments of approximately $244.0 million. These debt investments included approximately $0.5 million in PIK interest.
As of December 31, 2014, we had investments in debt securities of, or loans to, 57 portfolio companies, with a fair value of approximately $714.7 million, and equity investments of approximately $269.5 million. These debt investments included approximately $1.2 million in accrued PIK interest.
A reconciliation of the investment portfolio for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and the year ended December 31, 2014 follows:
(in millions) | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Year Ended December 31, 2014 |
||||||
Beginning investment portfolio | $ | 984.2 | $ | 931.6 | ||||
Portfolio investments acquired | 214.1 | 556.7 | ||||||
Repayments of principal and reductions to investment cost value | (217.8 | ) | (311.9 | ) | ||||
Sales of securities | (51.0 | ) | (127.5 | ) | ||||
Payment in Kind(1)(2) | 0.6 | 1.3 | ||||||
Accretion of discounts on investments(2) | 30.1 | 2.8 | ||||||
Net unrealized appreciation (depreciation)(1) | (30.8 | ) | (49.3 | ) | ||||
Net realized losses | (2.2 | ) | (19.5 | ) | ||||
Ending investment portfolio | $ | 927.2 | $ | 984.2 |
(1) | Includes rounding adjustments to reconcile September 30, 2015 period balances. |
(2) | Includes rounding adjustments to reconcile December 31, 2014 period balances. |
61
The following table indicates the quarterly portfolio investment activity for the past seven quarters:
(in millions) | New Investments |
Repayments of Principal and Reductions to Investment Cost value |
Sales of Securities |
|||||||||
Quarter ended: |
||||||||||||
September 30, 2015 | $ | 66.3 | $ | 65.3 | $ | | ||||||
June 30, 2015 | 88.2 | 99.9 | 33.4 | |||||||||
March 31, 2015 | 59.6 | 52.6 | 17.6 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 214.1 | $ | 217.8 | $ | 51.0 | ||||||
December 31, 2014 | $ | 193.8 | $ | 87.3 | $ | 24.7 | ||||||
September 30, 2014 | 97.6 | 73.7 | 48.3 | |||||||||
June 30, 2014 | 178.3 | 116.6 | 33.4 | |||||||||
March 31, 2014 | 87.0 | 34.3 | 21.1 | |||||||||
Total | $ | 556.7 | $ | 311.9 | $ | 127.5 |
The following table shows the fair value of our portfolio of investments by asset class as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
||||||||||||
Senior Secured Notes | $ | 680.5 | 73.4 | % | $ | 697.0 | 70.8 | % | ||||||||
Senior Unsecured Notes | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | 6.4 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||
Subordinated Debt | 0.5 | 0.1 | % | 0.0 | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||
CLO Equity | 237.2 | 25.6 | % | 259.8 | 26.4 | % | ||||||||||
CLO Debt | 2.3 | 0.2 | % | 11.3 | 1.1 | % | ||||||||||
Equity | 6.7 | 0.7 | % | 9.7 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||
Total | $ | 927.2 | 100.0 | % | $ | 984.2 | 100.0 | % |
62
The following table shows our portfolio of investments by industry at fair value, as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014:
September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Fair Value |
Investments at Fair Value |
Percentage of Fair Value |
|||||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | (dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
Structured finance(1) | $ | 239.5 | 25.8 | % | $ | 271.2 | 27.6 | % | ||||||||||||
Telecommunication services | 120.8 | 13.0 | % | 115.7 | 11.8 | % | ||||||||||||||
Financial intermediaries | 85.4 | 9.2 | % | 89.4 | 9.1 | % | ||||||||||||||
Printing and publishing | 71.4 | 7.7 | % | 73.4 | 7.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Business services | 70.8 | 7.6 | % | 105.4 | 10.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Software | 57.3 | 6.2 | % | 87.5 | 8.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Healthcare | 36.7 | 4.0 | % | 13.2 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Consumer services | 32.5 | 3.5 | % | 36.0 | 3.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Logistics | 18.8 | 2.0 | % | 13.9 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Enterprise software | 18.6 | 2.0 | % | 34.3 | 3.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Retail | 18.4 | 2.0 | % | 13.9 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Diversified insurance | 17.9 | 1.9 | % | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Computer hardware | 17.3 | 1.9 | % | 18.9 | 1.9 | % | ||||||||||||||
Grocery | 16.9 | 1.8 | % | 13.0 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Utilities | 16.2 | 1.7 | % | 9.6 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Travel | 14.5 | 1.6 | % | 15.1 | 1.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Radio and television | 14.0 | 1.5 | % | 14.2 | 1.4 | % | ||||||||||||||
Aerospace and defense | 12.6 | 1.4 | % | 12.7 | 1.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Education | 10.2 | 1.1 | % | 22.1 | 2.2 | % | ||||||||||||||
Leisure goods | 9.6 | 1.0 | % | 9.6 | 1.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
Pharmaceutical | 8.9 | 1.0 | % | 5.0 | 0.5 | % | ||||||||||||||
Electronics | 8.0 | 0.9 | % | 3.4 | 0.3 | % | ||||||||||||||
Auto parts manufacturer | 5.6 | 0.6 | % | | 0.0 | % | ||||||||||||||
IT consulting | 5.3 | 0.6 | % | 6.7 | 0.7 | % | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 927.2 | 100.0 | % | $ | 984.2 | 100.0 | % |
(1) | Reflects our debt and equity investments in CLOs as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively. |
PORTFOLIO GRADING
We have adopted a credit grading system to monitor the quality of our debt investment portfolio. As of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our portfolio had a weighted average grade of 2.2 and 2.1, respectively, based upon the fair value of the debt investments in the portfolio. Equity securities and investments in CLOs are not graded.
At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, our debt investment portfolio was graded as follows:
September 30, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grade | Summary Description | Principal Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Portfolio at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | (dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | Company is ahead of expectations and/or outperforming financial covenant requirements and such trend is expected to continue. |
$ | | 0.0 | % | $ | | 0.0% |
63
September 30, 2015 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grade | Summary Description | Principal Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
Portfolio at Fair Value |
Percentage of Total Portfolio |
|||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) | (dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
2 | Full repayment of the outstanding amount of TICCs cost basis and interest is expected, for the specific tranche. | 582.8 | 83.2 | % | 578.2 | 84.6 | % | |||||||||||||
3 | Closer monitoring is required. Full repayment of the outstanding amount of TICCs cost basis and interest is expected for the specific tranche. |
118.1 | 16.8 | % | 105.0 | 15.4 | % | |||||||||||||
4 | A loss of interest income has occurred or is expected to occur and, in most cases, the investment is placed on non-accrual status. Full repayment of the outstanding amount of TICCs cost basis is expected for the specific tranche. |
| 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
5 | Full repayment of the outstanding amount of TICCs cost basis is not expected for the specific tranche and the investment is placed on non-accrual status. | | 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
$ | 700.9 | 100.0 | % | $ | 683.2 | 100.0 | % |
December 31, 2014 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Grade | Summary Description | Principal Value | Percentage of Total Portfolio | Portfolio at Fair Value | Percentage of Total Portfolio | |||||||||||||||
(dollars in millions) |
(dollars in millions) | |||||||||||||||||||
1 | Company is ahead of expectations and/or outperforming financial covenant requirements and such trend is expected to continue. |
$ | | 0.0 | % | $ | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||
2 | Full repayment of the outstanding amount of TICCs cost basis and interest is expected, for the specific tranche. | 675.8 | 91.1 | % | 662.8 | 92.8 | % | |||||||||||||
3 | Closer monitoring is required. Full repayment of the outstanding amount of TICCs cost basis and interest is expected for the specific tranche. |
51.2 | 6.9 | % | 43.5 | 6.1 | % | |||||||||||||
4 | A reduction of interest income has occurred or is expected to occur. Full repayment of the outstanding amount of TICCs cost basis is expected for the specific tranche. |
| 0.0 | % | | 0.0 | % | |||||||||||||
5 | Full repayment of the outstanding amount of TICCs cost basis is not expected for the specific tranche. | 15.0 | 2.0 | % | 8.3 | 1.1 | % | |||||||||||||
$ | 742.0 | 100.0 | % | $ | 714.6 | 100.0 | % |
We expect that a portion of our investments will be in the grades 3, 4 or 5 categories from time to time, and, as such, we will be required to work with troubled portfolio companies to improve their business and protect our investment. The number and amount of investments included in grades 3, 4 or 5 may fluctuate from period to period.
Further discussion regarding the other investments which experienced significant unrealized depreciation is presented in Results of Operations.
64
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Set forth below is a comparison of our results of operations for the three months ended September 30, 2015 to the three months ended September 30, 2014.
Investment Income
Investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 was approximately $23.1 million and $30.2 million, respectively, reflecting a decrease of $7.1 million. The following tables set forth the components of investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||
Interest income |
||||||||
Stated interest income | $ | 11,812,652 | $ | 12,167,910 | ||||
Original issue discount and market discount income | 2,231,377 | 646,381 | ||||||
Payment-in-kind income | 97,914 | 276,953 | ||||||
Discount income derived from unscheduled remittances at par | 2,389 | 36,543 | ||||||
Total interest income | $ | 14,144,332 | $ | 13,127,787 | ||||
Income from securitization vehicles(1) | $ | 8,617,121 | $ | 15,170,869 | ||||
Commitment, amendment and other fee income |
||||||||
Fee letters | $ | 339,566 | $ | 341,159 | ||||
Success fees on CLO warehouses | | 1,031,360 | ||||||
Loan prepayment and bond call fees | | 225,000 | ||||||
All other fees | 33,369 | 279,548 | ||||||
Total commitment, amendment and other fee income | $ | 372,935 | $ | 1,877,067 | ||||
Total investment income | $ | 23,134,388 | $ | 30,175,723 |
(1) | During the first quarter of 2015, we identified a non-material error in our accounting policy for revenue recognition refer to Note 3. Change in Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investment Income in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. |
The decrease in total investment income was primarily due to a reduction of income from securitization vehicles resulting from a change in accounting policy related to our CLO equity investments described in further detail in Note 3. Change in Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investment Income in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, a decrease in commitment, amendment and other fee income, partially offset by an approximate $1.4 million out of period adjustment to interest income described further in Note 4 Summary of Significant Accounting Policies in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. The total principal value of income producing debt investments as of September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 was approximately $700.9 million and $660.3 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2015, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 4.00% and 15.00% and maturity dates of between 6 and 100 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 7.2%, compared with 8.0% as of September 30, 2014. The reduction in the weighted average yield on our debt portfolio over the past year is primarily a result of the investment restrictions of the securitization vehicles that we have sponsored, which require us to generally invest in higher-rated and/or larger corporate loans which carry correspondingly lower yields, as well as the refinancing and repricing of many of those loans at lower rates due to current market conditions.
65
Operating Expenses
Total expenses for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 were approximately $12.3 million and expenses before incentive fees, for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, were approximately $12.7 million. This amount consisted of investment advisory fees, interest expense and other debt financing expenses, professional fees, compensation expense, and general and administrative expenses.
Expenses before incentive fees for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 were approximately $11.7 million, which decreased approximately $0.1 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2014, attributable to lower investment advisory fees and compensation expense partially offset by higher professional fees. Expenses before incentive fees for the quarter ended September 30, 2014 were approximately $11.8 million.
The investment advisory fee for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 was approximately $5.3 million, representing the base fee as provided for in the Investment Advisory Agreement. The investment advisory fee in the comparable period in 2014 was approximately $5.4 million as the weighted average gross assets declined due largely to lower fair values. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, approximately $5.8 million and $6.2 million, respectively, of investment advisory fees remained payable to TICC Management, including the net investment income incentive fee discussed below.
Interest expense and other debt financing expenses for the third quarter of 2015 was approximately $5.0 million, which was directly related to our debt securitization financing transactions, Convertible Notes and Facility, compared with interest expense and other debt financing expenses of approximately $5.0 million for the quarter ended September 30, 2014.
The aggregate accrued interest which remained payable at September 30, 2015, was approximately $5.0 million, comprised of: $0.7 million for the notes of TICC CLO 2012-1, $3.6 million for the 2017 Convertible Notes, and approximately $0.7 million for the TICC Funding LLC notes. The aggregate interest payable at December 31, 2014, was approximately $2.6 million.
Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and tax fees, were approximately $819,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2015, compared to approximately $604,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2014. This increase was primarily the result of a change in the timing of audit fees.
Compensation expenses were approximately $90,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 compared to approximately $473,000 for the quarter ended September 30, 2014, reflecting the allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our chief financial officer, accounting personnel, and other administrative support staff. This decrease was largely the result of the reversal of previously accrued compensation and staffing changes. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, approximately $43,000 and $0 of compensation expenses remained payable.
General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of directors fees, insurance, listing fees, transfer agent and custodian fees, office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, were approximately $489,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2015 compared to approximately $385,000, for the comparable period in 2014. Office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the Administration Agreement.
Incentive Fees
The net investment income incentive fee recorded for the third quarter of 2015 was approximately $0.6 million compared to $1.7 million in the third quarter of 2014. This decrease results from the change in our accounting policy for revenue recognition refer to Note 3. Change in Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investment Income in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
The net investment income incentive fee is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter subject to a hurdle rate which is determined as of December 31 of the preceding year. For this purpose, Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means interest income, dividend income and any other income accrued during the calendar quarter minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base fee, expenses payable
66
under the Administration Agreement with BDC Partners, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee).
The capital gains incentive fee expense, as reported under generally accepted accounting principles, is calculated on the basis of net realized and unrealized gains and losses at the end of each period. The expense related to the hypothetical liquidation of the portfolio (and assuming no other changes in realized or unrealized gains and losses) would only become payable to our investment adviser in the event of a complete liquidation of our portfolio as of period end and the termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement on such date. For the three months ended September 30, 2015, no accrual was required as a result of the impact of accumulated net unrealized depreciation on our portfolio. For the three months ended September 30, 2014, an accrual reversal of approximately $800,000 was recorded under the hypothetical liquidation calculation.
The amount of the capital gains incentive fee which will actually be payable is determined in accordance with the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement and is calculated as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). The terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement state that the capital gains incentive fee calculation is based on net realized gains, if any, offset by gross unrealized depreciation for the calendar year. No effect is given to gross unrealized appreciation in this calculation. For the year ended December 31, 2014, such an accrual was not required under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement.
Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments
For the three months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized net realized gains on investments of approximately $0.4 million, which primarily reflects the gains from the repayment of our debt investment held in Jackson Hewitt Tax Service, Inc.
For the three months ended September 30, 2015, our net change in unrealized depreciation was approximately $41.0 million, composed of $1.1 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $41.7 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $0.4 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized appreciation as investment gains and losses were realized. This includes net unrealized appreciation of approximately $9.7 million as a result of reductions to the cost value of our CLO equity investments under the effective yield accounting methodology, whereby the cost value of the respective investments are reduced by the excess of actual cash received (and record date distributions to be received) over the calculated income using the effective yield.
The most significant components of the net change in unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the three months ended September 30, 2015 were as follows:
Portfolio Company | Changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|||
Unitek Global Services, Inc | $ | (1.6 | ) | |
Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2012-2 Ltd | (1.2 | ) | ||
RBS Holding Company | (1.2 | ) | ||
Ares XXVI CLO Ltd | (1.3 | ) | ||
Carlyle Global Market Strategies CLO 2014-4, Ltd | (1.4 | ) | ||
Cedar Funding II CLO, Ltd | (1.5 | ) | ||
Ares XXIX CLO Ltd | (1.6 | ) | ||
Ares XXV CLO Ltd | (1.6 | ) | ||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared) | (2.0 | ) | ||
Jamestown CLO V Ltd | (2.0 | ) | ||
Shackleton 2013-IV CLO, Ltd | (2.2 | ) | ||
Marea CLO, Ltd | (2.2 | ) | ||
Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd | (2.4 | ) | ||
Newmark Capital Funding 2013-1 CLO Ltd | (2.7 | ) | ||
Mountain Hawk III CLO, Ltd | (3.4 | ) | ||
Net all other | (12.7 | ) | ||
Total | $ | (41.0 | ) |
67
For the three months ended September 30, 2014, we recognized net realized losses on investments of approximately $3.5 million, which primarily represented the loss on the sale of our equity investment in Stone Tower CLO VII, Ltd. of approximately $4.4 million and net realized gains from the sale and repayment of several other of our debt and equity investments which totaled approximately $0.9 million.
For the three months ended September 30, 2014, our net change in unrealized depreciation was approximately $15.3 million, comprised of $4.0 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $23.6 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $4.3 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation as investments were realized.
The most significant components of the net change in unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the three months ended September 30, 2014 were as follows:
Portfolio Company | Changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) |
|||
Stone Tower CLO VII Ltd | $ | 4.9 | ||
Merrill Communications, LLC | 2.2 | |||
Canaras Summit CLO Ltd | 0.9 | |||
RBS Holding Company | 0.8 | |||
Ares XXIX CLO Ltd | 0.5 | |||
Catamaran CLO 2013-1 Ltd | (0.5 | ) | ||
HarbourView CLO 2006-1 | (0.5 | ) | ||
Marea CLO, Ltd | (0.6 | ) | ||
AMMC CLO XII, Ltd | (0.8 | ) | ||
Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd | (0.9 | ) | ||
Cedar Funding II CLO, Ltd | (1.0 | ) | ||
Ivy Hill Middle Market Credit Fund VII, Ltd | (1.0 | ) | ||
Ares XXV CLO Ltd | (1.1 | ) | ||
Telos CLO 2013-3, Ltd | (1.1 | ) | ||
ACA CLO 2007-1, Ltd | (1.3 | ) | ||
Ares XXVI CLO Ltd | (1.4 | ) | ||
Benefit Street Partners CLO II, Ltd | (1.4 | ) | ||
Emporia Preferred Funding III, Ltd | (1.7 | ) | ||
Unitek Global Services, Inc | (5.2 | ) | ||
Net all other | (6.1 | ) | ||
Total | $ | (15.3 | ) |
Please see Portfolio Grading for more information.
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Net Investment Income
Net investment income for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 was approximately $10.9 million and $17.5 million, respectively, or a decrease of $6.6 million. The decrease was largely the result of lower investment income of $7.1 million, partially offset by a reduction in total expenses of $0.4 million, as discussed above.
For the three months ended September 30, 2015, the net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share was $0.18 (basic and diluted), compared to the net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per share of $0.29 (basic) and $0.28 (diluted) for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Due to the anti-dilutive effect on the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2015, the adjustments for interest on convertible senior notes, investment advisory fees, deferred issuance costs and net investment income incentive fees as well as adjustments for dilutive effect of convertible notes were excluded from the respective periods diluted earnings per share computation.
For the three months ended September 30, 2015, the net increase in the net assets resulting from core net investment income per common share was $0.34 (basic and diluted), compared to $0.28 (basic) and $0.27 (diluted) for the three months ended September 30, 2014.
68
Please see Supplemental Information Regarding Core Net Investment Income and Core Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations below for more information.
Net Decrease in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
Net decrease in net assets resulting from operations for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 was approximately $29.7 million and $1.3 million, respectively, or a decrease of approximately $28.4 million. This decrease was largely due to lower net investment income of $6.6 million and greater unrealized depreciation on investments of $25.7 million, partially offset by an increase in net realized gains of $3.9 million.
For the three months ended September 30, 2015, the net decrease in net assets resulting from operations per common share was $0.50 (basic and diluted), compared to a net decrease in net assets resulting from operations per share of approximately $0.02 (basic and diluted) for the three months ended September 30, 2014. Due to the anti-dilutive effect on the computation of diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, the adjustments for interest on convertible senior notes, investment advisory fees, deferred issuance costs and net investment income incentive fees as well as adjustments for dilutive effect of convertible notes were excluded from the respective periods diluted earnings per share computation.
For the three months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, the core net decrease in net assets resulting from operations per common share was $0.50 (basic and diluted) and $0.03 (basic and diluted), respectively.
Please see Supplemental Information Regarding Core Net Investment Income and Core Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations below for more information.
Set forth below is a comparison of our results of operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Investment Income
Investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 was approximately $68.7 million compared to approximately $88.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, reflecting a decrease of $20.1 million. The following tables set forth the components of investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||
Interest income |
||||||||
Stated interest income | $ | 35,869,821 | $ | 36,223,209 | ||||
Original issue discount and market discount income | 3,741,070 | 2,084,263 | ||||||
Payment-in-kind income | 599,858 | 966,960 | ||||||
Discount income derived from unscheduled remittances at par | 61,700 | 177,708 | ||||||
Total interest income | $ | 40,272,449 | $ | 39,452,140 | ||||
Income from securitization vehicles(1) | $ | 26,396,541 | $ | 45,047,290 | ||||
Commitment, amendment and other fee income |
||||||||
Fee letters | $ | 1,014,381 | $ | 922,754 | ||||
Success fees on CLO warehouses | | 1,031,360 | ||||||
Loan prepayment and bond call fees | 360,000 | 1,763,880 | ||||||
All other fees | 610,925 | 549,885 | ||||||
Total commitment, amendment and other fee income | $ | 1,985,306 | $ | 4,267,879 | ||||
Total investment income | $ | 68,654,296 | $ | 88,767,309 |
(1) | During the first quarter of 2015, we identified a non-material error in our accounting policy for revenue recognition refer to Note 3. Change in Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investment Income in the notes to our consolidated financial statements. |
The decrease in total investment income was primarily due to a decrease of $18.7 million in income from securitization vehicles resulting primarily from a change in accounting policy related to our CLO equity
69
investments described in further detail in Note 3. Change in Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investment Income in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, and a decrease of $2.3 million in commitment, amendment and other fee income, partially offset by an increase in investment income attributable to an approximate $1.4 million out of period adjustment to interest income. The total principal value of income producing debt investments as of September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 was approximately $700.9 million and $660.3 million, respectively.
As of September 30, 2015, our debt investments had stated interest rates of between 4.00% and 15.00% and maturity dates of between 6 and 100 months. In addition, our total portfolio had a weighted average yield on debt investments of approximately 7.2%, compared with 8.0% as of September 30, 2014. The reduction in the weighted average yield on our debt portfolio over the past year is primarily a result of the investment restrictions of the securitization vehicles that we have sponsored, which require us to generally invest in higher-rated and/or larger corporate loans which carry correspondingly lower yields, as well as the refinancing and repricing of many of those loans at lower rates due to current market conditions.
Operating Expenses
Total expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were approximately $34.6 million, which includes a credit for net investment income incentive fees of approximately $0.9 million comprised of the fee reversal of approximately $2.4 million recorded during the first quarter ended March 31, 2015 (representing the cumulative overstatement of incentive fees resulting from the identification and correction of a non-material error in our accounting policy for revenue recognition refer to Note 3. Change in Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investment Income in the notes to our consolidated financial statements), partially offset by the net investment income incentive fees earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 of approximately $1.5 million. TICC Management repaid in full to TICC, on April 30, 2015, the portion of its previously paid net investment income incentive fees attributable to the overstated amounts.
Expenses before incentive fees, for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, were approximately $35.5 million. This amount consisted of investment advisory fees, interest expense and other debt financing expenses, professional fees, compensation expense, and general and administrative expenses. Expenses before incentive fees increased approximately $0.4 million from the quarter ended September 30, 2014, mainly attributable to higher professional fees. Expenses before incentive fees for the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were approximately $35.1 million.
The investment advisory base fee for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was approximately $15.6 million, representing the base fee as provided for in the Investment Advisory Agreement. The investment advisory fee in the comparable period in 2014 was approximately $15.8 million as the weighted average gross assets declined due largely to lower fair values. At each of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, approximately $5.8 million and $6.2 million of investment advisory fees remained payable to TICC Management, including the net investment income incentive fee discussed below.
Interest expense and other debt financing expenses for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 was approximately $15.0 million, which was directly related to our debt securitization financing transactions, Convertible Notes and Facility, compared with interest expense and other debt financing expenses of approximately $14.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
The aggregate accrued interest which remained payable at September 30, 2015, was approximately $5.0 million, comprised of: $0.7 million for the notes of TICC CLO 2012-1, $3.6 million for the 2017 Convertible Notes, and approximately $0.7 million for the TICC Funding LLC notes. The aggregate interest payable at December 31, 2014, was approximately $2.6 million.
Professional fees, consisting of legal, valuation, audit and tax fees, were approximately $2.3 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2015, compared to approximately $1.6 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. This increase was primarily the result of a change in the timing of audit fees and increased legal costs.
Compensation expenses were approximately $965,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 compared to approximately $1.4 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2014, reflecting the
70
allocation of compensation expenses for the services of our chief financial officer, chief compliance officer, accounting staff, and other administrative support personnel. This decrease was largely the result of the reversal of previously accrued compensation and staffing changes. At September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, respectively, approximately $43,000 and $0 of compensation expenses remained payable.
General and administrative expenses, consisting primarily of directors fees, insurance, listing fees, transfer agent and custodian fees, office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses, were approximately $1.7 million and $1.6 million for the each of the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Office supplies, facilities costs and other expenses are allocated to us under the terms of the Administration Agreement.
Incentive Fees
The net investment income incentive fee for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 resulted in a credit of approximately $930,000 which was composed of a fee reversal of approximately $2.4 million, representing the cumulative overstatement of fees from 2009 through 2014 resulting from the identification and correction of a non-material error in our accounting policy for revenue recognition refer to Note 3. Change of Accounting for Collateralized Loan Obligation Equity Investment Income in the notes to our consolidated financial statements, partially offset by approximately $1.5 million representing the net investment income incentive fee earned for the nine months ended September 30, 2015. TICC Management repaid in full to TICC, on April 30, 2015, the portion of its previously paid net investment income incentive fees attributable to the overstated amounts. The net investment income incentive fee recorded for the nine months ended 2014 was approximately $4.8 million. The net investment income incentive fee is calculated and payable quarterly in arrears based on our Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income for the immediately preceding calendar quarter subject to a hurdle rate which is determined as of December 31 of the preceding year. For this purpose, Pre-Incentive Fee Net Investment Income means interest income, dividend income and any other income accrued during the calendar quarter minus our operating expenses for the quarter (including the base fee, expenses payable under the Administration Agreement with BDC Partners, and any interest expense and dividends paid on any issued and outstanding preferred stock, but excluding the incentive fee).
The capital gains incentive fee expense, as reported under generally accepted accounting principles, is calculated on the basis of net realized and unrealized gains and losses at the end of each period. The expense related to the hypothetical liquidation of the portfolio (and assuming no other changes in realized or unrealized gains and losses) would only become payable to our investment adviser in the event of a complete liquidation of our portfolio as of period end and the termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement on such date. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, no accrual was required as a result of the impact of accumulated net unrealized depreciation and net realized losses on our portfolio. For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, an accrual reversal of approximately $3.9 million was recorded under the hypothetical liquidation calculation.
The amount of the capital gains incentive fee which will actually be payable is determined in accordance with the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement and is calculated as of the end of each calendar year (or upon termination of the Investment Advisory Agreement). The terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement state that the capital gains incentive fee calculation is based on net realized gains, if any, offset by gross unrealized depreciation for the calendar year. No effect is given to gross unrealized appreciation in this calculation. For the year ended December 31, 2014, such an accrual was not required under the terms of the Investment Advisory Agreement.
71
Realized and Unrealized Gains/Losses on Investments
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, we recognized net realized losses on investments of approximately $2.2 million, which represents the losses from the restructuring of our debt investment in Unitek Global Services, Inc. (approximately $4.3 million) and from the repayment of our debt and sale equity investments in Nextag, Inc. (approximately $2.5 million), partially offset by realized gains from the sale of our equity investment held in Merrill Communications LLC (approximately $2.8 million) and from the repayment of our debt investment held in Merrill Communications LLC (approximately $2.6 million).
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, our net change in unrealized depreciation was approximately $30.8 million, composed of $7.8 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $45.5 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $6.9 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation as investments were realized. This includes net unrealized appreciation of approximately $29.9 million as a result of reductions to the cost value of our CLO equity investments under the effective yield accounting methodology, whereby the cost value of the respective investments are reduced by the excess of actual cash received (and record date distributions to be received) over the calculated income using the effective yield.
The most significant components of the net change in unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 were as follows (in millions):
Portfolio Company | Changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | |||
Unitek Global Services, Inc | $ | 2.9 | ||
Nextag, Inc | 2.7 | |||
Ivy Hill Middle Market Credit Fund VII, Ltd | 1.2 | |||
Hull Street CLO Ltd | (1.1 | ) | ||
Halcyon Loan Advisors Funding 2012-2 Ltd | (1.2 | ) | ||
Ares XXV CLO Ltd | (1.4 | ) | ||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc. (d/b/a Ai Squared) | (2.0 | ) | ||
Newmark Capital Funding 2013-1 CLO Ltd | (2.1 | ) | ||
Jamestown CLO V Ltd | (2.2 | ) | ||
Ares XXIX CLO Ltd | (2.5 | ) | ||
Marea CLO, Ltd | (2.6 | ) | ||
Shackleton 2013-IV CLO, Ltd | (2.7 | ) | ||
Source Hov, LLC | (2.7 | ) | ||
Merrill Communications, LLC | (3.2 | ) | ||
Mountain Hawk III CLO, Ltd | (4.3 | ) | ||
Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd | (4.8 | ) | ||
Net all other | (4.8 | ) | ||
Total | $ | (30.8 | ) |
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, we recognized net realized losses on investments of approximately $12.2 million, which represents the loss on the restructuring of our debt investment in Nextag Inc. of approximately $5.3 million, the loss on the sale of our equity investment in Stone Tower CLO VII Ltd. of approximately $4.4 million and net realized losses from the sale and repayment of several of our debt and equity investments which totaled approximately $2.5 million.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2014, our net change in unrealized depreciation was approximately $15.4 million, comprised of $6.7 million in gross unrealized appreciation, $30.4 million in gross unrealized depreciation and approximately $8.3 million relating to the reversal of prior period net unrealized depreciation as investments were realized.
72
The most significant changes in the net change in unrealized appreciation and depreciation during the nine months ended September 30, 2014 were as follows (in millions):
Portfolio Company | Changes in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) | |||
Stone Tower CLO VII Ltd | $ | 4.0 | ||
Nextag, Inc | 3.7 | |||
Merrill Communications, LLC | 1.4 | |||
Lightpoint CLO VIII, Ltd | 1.3 | |||
Mmodal, Inc | 1.2 | |||
Ares XXIX CLO Ltd | 1.1 | |||
Jersey Street CLO, Ltd | 0.9 | |||
Mountain Hawk III CLO, Ltd | 0.9 | |||
Canaras Summit CLO Ltd | 0.6 | |||
Global Tel Link Corp | 0.5 | |||
Shackleton 2013-III CLO, Ltd | (0.5 | ) | ||
GlobalLogic Holdings Inc | (0.5 | ) | ||
Algorithmic Implementations, Inc | (0.7 | ) | ||
Cedar Funding II CLO, Ltd | (0.7 | ) | ||
AMMC CLO XII, Ltd | (0.8 | ) | ||
Ares XXV CLO Ltd | (0.8 | ) | ||
Catamaran CLO 2013-1 Ltd | (0.9 | ) | ||
HarbourView CLO 2006-1 | (1.0 | ) | ||
Benefit Street Partners CLO II, Ltd | (1.2 | ) | ||
RBS Holding Company | (1.2 | ) | ||
Telos CLO 2013-3, Ltd | (1.2 | ) | ||
Columbus Park CDO Ltd | (1.3 | ) | ||
Telos CLO 2014-5, Ltd | (1.4 | ) | ||
Emporia Preferred Funding III, Ltd | (1.5 | ) | ||
Ares XXVI CLO Ltd | (2.0 | ) | ||
Catamaran CLO 2012-1 Ltd | (2.7 | ) | ||
ACA CLO 2007-1, Ltd | (2.9 | ) | ||
Unitek Global Services, Inc | (5.4 | ) | ||
Net all other | (4.3 | ) | ||
Total | $ | (15.4 | ) |
Please see Portfolio Grading for more information.
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Net Investment Income
Net investment income for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 was approximately $34.1 million and $52.7 million, respectively, or a decrease of $18.6 million. This decrease was largely due to lower investment income of $20.1 million, partially offset by reduced expenses of $1.5 million, as discussed above.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per common share was $0.57 (basic and diluted), compared to the net increase in net assets resulting from net investment income per share of $0.90 (basic) and $0.85 (diluted) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the net increase in the net assets resulting from core net investment income per common share was $1.03 (basic) and $0.97 (diluted), compared to $0.84 (basic) and $0.80 (diluted) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
73
Please see Supplemental Information Regarding Core Net Investment Income and Core Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations below for more information.
Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014 was approximately $1.1 million and $25.1 million, respectively, or a decrease of $24.0 million. This decrease was largely due to a lower net investment income of approximately $18.6 million and greater unrealized depreciation on investments of $15.4 million, partially offset by a decrease in net realized losses of $10.0 million.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share was $0.02 (basic and diluted), compared to a net increase in net assets resulting from operations per share of approximately $0.43 (basic and diluted) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014. Due to the anti-dilutive effect on the computation of diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and September 30, 2014, the adjustments for interest on convertible senior notes, investment advisory fees, deferred issuance costs and net investment income incentive fees as well as adjustments for dilutive effect of convertible notes were excluded from the respective periods diluted earnings per share computation.
For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, the core net increase in net assets resulting from operations per common share for the quarter ended September 30, 2015 were $0.02 (basic and diluted), compared to $0.36 (basic and diluted) for the nine months ended September 30, 2014.
Please see Supplemental Information Regarding Core Net Investment Income and Core Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations below for more information.
Supplemental Information Regarding Core Net Investment Income and Core Net Increase in Net Assets Resulting from Operations
On a supplemental basis, we provide information relating to core net investment income, its ratio to net assets and core net increase in net assets resulting from operations, which are non-GAAP measures. These measures are provided in addition to, but not as a substitute for, net investment income and net increase in net assets resulting from operations. Our non-GAAP measures may differ from similar measures by other companies, even if similar terms are used to identify such measures. Core net investment income represents net investment income adjusted for additional taxable income on our CLO equity investments and also excludes our capital gains incentive fee. Core net increase in net assets resulting from operations represents net increase in net assets resulting from operations excluding the capital gains incentive fee (there would not have been any change to the net increase in net assets resulting from operations resulting from our CLO equity investments as there is an offsetting change in unrealized appreciation equal to the change in net investment income).
Income from investments in the equity class securities of CLO equity vehicles, for generally accepted accounting purposes, is recorded using the effective interest method. This method requires an estimate of future cash flows, including recurring cash flows as well as future principal payments, compared to the cost resulting in an effective yield for the investment; the difference between the actual cash received or distributions entitled to receive and the effective yield calculation is an adjustment to cost. Accordingly, investment income recognized on CLO equity securities in the GAAP statement of operations differs from both the tax-basis investment income and from the cash distributions actually received by us during the period, (referred to below as CLO equity additional estimated taxable income). As the capital gains incentive fee, for generally accepted accounting purposes, is based on the hypothetical liquidation of the entire portfolio (and as any capital gains incentive fee may be non-recurring), such fees are excluded when calculating core net investment income. We believe that core net investment income and core net increase in net assets resulting from operations are useful indicators of performance during this period. Further, as the RIC requirements are to distribute taxable earnings and as capital gains incentive fees may not be fully currently tax deductible, the core net investment income provides a better indication of estimated taxable income for the year-to-date.
74
The following tables provide a reconciliation of net investment income to core net investment income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Per Share Amounts (basic) | Per Share Amounts (diluted) | Amount | Per Share Amounts (basic) | Per Share Amounts (diluted) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 10,874,618 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 0.18 | $ | 34,070,661 | $ | 0.57 | $ | 0.57 | ||||||||||||
CLO equity additional estimated taxable income | 9,343,218 | 0.16 | 0.16 | 27,862,186 | 0.46 | 0.40 | ||||||||||||||||||
Capital gains incentive fee | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Core net investment income | $ | 20,217,836 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 0.34 | $ | 61,932,847 | $ | 1.03 | $ | 0.97 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Per Share Amounts (basic) | Per Share Amounts (diluted) | Amount | Per Share Amounts (basic) | Per Share Amounts (diluted) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net investment income | $ | 17,520,528 | $ | 0.29 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 52,695,296 | $ | 0.90 | $ | 0.85 | ||||||||||||
Capital gains incentive fee | (837,963 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (3,872,853 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.06 | ) | ||||||||||||
Core net investment income | $ | 16,682,565 | $ | 0.28 | $ | 0.27 | $ | 48,822,443 | $ | 0.83 | $ | 0.79 |
The following table provides a reconciliation of net increase in net assets resulting from operations to core net increase in net assets resulting from operations for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Per Share Amounts (basic) | Per Share Amounts (diluted) | Amount | Per Share Amounts (basic) | Per Share Amounts (diluted) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ | (29,734,738 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | 1,121,682 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 | |||||||||
Capital gains incentive fee | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||
Core net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ | (29,734,738 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | 1,121,682 | $ | 0.02 | $ | 0.02 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||||||||||||
Amount | Per Share Amounts (basic) | Per Share Amounts (diluted) | Amount | Per Share Amounts (basic) | Per Share Amounts (diluted) | |||||||||||||||||||
Net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ | (1,261,925 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | (0.02 | ) | $ | 25,133,990 | $ | 0.43 | $ | 0.43 | |||||||||
Capital gains incentive fee | (837,963 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (0.01 | ) | (3,872,853 | ) | (0.07 | ) | (0.07 | ) | ||||||||||||
Core net increase in net assets resulting from operations | $ | (2,099,888 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | (0.03 | ) | $ | 21,261,137 | $ | 0.36 | $ | 0.36 |
In addition, the following ratio is presented to supplement the financial highlights included in Note 15. Financial Highlights in the notes to our consolidated financial statements:
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
|||||||||||||
Ratio of core net investment income to average net assets | 16.43 | % | 16.17 | % | 11.58 | % | 11.52 | % |
75
The following table provides a reconciliation of the ratio of net investment income to average net assets to the ratio of core net investment income to average net assets for the three month and nine month periods ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
2015 | 2014 | |||||||||||||||
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||
Ratio of net investment income to average net assets | 8.84 | % | 8.90 | % | 12.16 | % | 12.43 | % | ||||||||
Ratio of CLO equity additional estimated taxable income to average net assets | 7.59 | % | 7.27 | % | | | ||||||||||
Ratio of capital gain incentive fee to average net assets | | | (0.58 | )% | (0.91 | )% | ||||||||||
Ratio of core net investment income to average net assets | 16.43 | % | 16.17 | % | 11.58 | % | 11.52 | % |
76
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES
As of September 30, 2015, cash and cash equivalents were $21.2 million as compared to $20.5 million at December 31, 2014. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash provided by operating activities for the period, consisting primarily of the items described in Results of Operations, was approximately $52.1 million, largely reflecting proceeds from principal repayments and reductions to cost value and sales of investments of approximately $261.5 million partially offset by purchases of new investments of approximately $215.3 million. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash provided by investing activities of approximately $1.9 million reflects the change in restricted cash in the debt securitization entity. For the nine months ended September 30, 2015, net cash used by financing activities was approximately $53.4 million, reflecting the distribution of dividends and repurchase of common stock.
Contractual Obligations
A summary of our significant contractual payment obligations is as follows as of September 30, 2015:
Contractual obligations | Total | Payments Due by Period | ||||||||||||||||||
Less than 1 year |
1 3 years | 3 5 years | More than 5 years | |||||||||||||||||
Long-term debt obligations: |
||||||||||||||||||||
TICC Funding Revolving Credit Facility | $ | 150,000,000 | $ | | $ | 150,000,000 | $ | | $ | | ||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC | 240,000,000 | | | | 240,000,000 | |||||||||||||||
TICC Convertible Notes | 115,000,000 | | 115,000,000 | | | |||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 505,000,000 | $ | | $ | 265,000,000 | $ | | $ | 240,000,000 |
See also Note 7. Borrowings in the notes to our consolidated financial statements.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We currently have no off-balance sheet arrangements, including any risk management of commodity pricing or other hedging practices.
Share Repurchase Program
On December 18, 2014, our board of directors authorized a repurchase program to be in place until the earlier of June 30, 2015 or until $50 million of our outstanding shares of common stock were repurchased. Under the repurchase program, we were able to, but were not obligated to, repurchase our outstanding common stock in the open market from time to time provided that we complied with the prohibitions under our Insider Trading Policies and Procedures and the guidelines specified in Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including certain price, market volume and timing constraints. In addition, repurchases were conducted in accordance with the 1940 Act. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, we repurchased 315,783 shares at the weighted average price of approximately $7.56 per share, inclusive of commissions. This represents a discount of approximately 13.3% of the net asset value per share at March 31, 2015. The total dollar amount of shares repurchased in this program was approximately $2.4 million, through the programs expiration on June 30, 2015. No shares were repurchased during the three months ended September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the Company did not have an active share repurchase program.
Borrowings
In accordance with the 1940 Act, with certain limited exceptions, the Company is only allowed to borrow amounts such that its asset coverage, as defined in the 1940 Act, is at least 200% immediately after such borrowing. The most recent borrowing was the TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility which occurred on October 27, 2014, at which point the asset coverage was in excess of 200%. As of September 30, 2015, the Companys asset coverage for borrowed amounts was 192.1%. As a result of the asset coverage being less than 200%, we would be precluded from taking on additional borrowings.
77
The following are the Companys outstanding principal amounts, carrying values and fair values of the Companys borrowings as of September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014. Fair values of our notes payable are based upon the bid price provided by the placement agent at the measurement date, if available:
As of | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
September 30, 2015 | December 31, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
($ in thousands) | Principal Amount | Carrying Value | Fair Value |
Principal Amount | Carrying Value | Fair Value |
||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 2023 Notes | $ | 176,000 | $ | 174,419 | (1) | $ | 175,340 | $ | 176,000 | $ | 174,271 | (1) | $ | 176,000 | ||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 2023 Notes | 20,000 | 19,564 | (1) | 19,838 | 20,000 | 19,524 | (1) | 20,000 | ||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 2023 Notes | 23,000 | 22,262 | (1) | 22,885 | 23,000 | 22,194 | (1) | 23,000 | ||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 2023 Notes | 21,000 | 20,162 | (1) | 21,000 | 21,000 | 20,087 | (1) | 21,011 | ||||||||||||||||
Sub-total TICC CLO 2012-1, LLC Notes | 240,000 | 236,407 | 239,063 | 240,000 | 236,076 | 240,011 | ||||||||||||||||||
TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility(2) | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | 150,000 | ||||||||||||||||||
2017 Convertible Notes | 115,000 | 115,000 | 118,450 | 115,000 | 115,000 | 119,025 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 505,000 | $ | 501,407 | $ | 507,513 | $ | 505,000 | $ | 501,076 | $ | 509,036 |
(1) | Represents the aggregate principal amount outstanding less the unaccreted discount. As of September 30, 2015, the total unaccreted discount for the 2023 Class A Notes, the 2023 Class B Notes, the 2023 Class C Notes and the 2023 Class D Notes was approximately $1,581, $436, $738 and $838, respectively. As of December 31, 2014, the total unaccreted discount for the 2023 Class A Notes, the 2023 Class B Notes, the 2023 Class C Notes and the 2023 Class D Notes was approximately $1,729, $476, $806 and $913, respectively. |
(2) | TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility fair value represents the par amount of the debt obligation. |
The weighted average stated interest rate and weighted average maturity on all our debt outstanding as of September 30, 2015 were 3.60% and 4.9 years, respectively, and as of December 31, 2014 were 3.54% and 5.6 years, respectively.
The table below summarizes the components of interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Stated Interest Expense | Note Discount Expense | Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs | Total | Stated Interest Expense | Note Discount Expense | Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO LLC Class A Notes | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 642.4 | $ | 40.0 | $ | 76.3 | $ | 758.7 | ||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 Notes | 912.3 | 50.0 | | 962.3 | 890.7 | 49.9 | | 940.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 Notes | 192.1 | 13.6 | | 205.7 | 190.7 | 13.5 | | 204.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 Notes | 293.6 | 22.7 | | 316.3 | 292.7 | 22.5 | | 315.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 Notes | 321.2 | 25.4 | | 346.6 | 320.9 | 25.2 | | 346.1 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC amortization of deferred debt | | | 86.7 | 86.7 | | | 86.7 | 86.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 Convertible Notes | 2,156.3 | | 156.0 | 2,312.3 | 2,156.3 | | 156.0 | 2,312.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility |
683.8 | | 117.6 | 801.4 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 4,559.3 | $ | 111.7 | (1) | $ | 360.3 | $ | 5,031.3 | $ | 4,493.7 | $ | 151.1 | $ | 319.0 | $ | 4,963.8 |
(1) | Includes rounding adjustments to reconcile period balances. |
78
The table below summarizes the components of interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014:
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
(dollars in thousands) | Stated Interest Expense | Note Discount Expense | Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs | Total | Stated Interest Expense | Note Discount Expense | Amortization of Deferred Debt Issuance Costs | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO LLC Class A Notes | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | | $ | 1,907.4 | $ | 118.8 | $ | 226.2 | $ | 2,252.4 | ||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class A-1 Notes | 2,688.2 | 148.4 | | 2,836.6 | 2,646.5 | 148.1 | | 2,794.6 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class B-1 Notes | 569.9 | 40.3 | | 610.2 | 566.2 | 40.1 | | 606.3 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class C-1 Notes | 872.6 | 67.2 | | 939.8 | 869.1 | 66.7 | | 935.8 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC Class D-1 Notes | 955.4 | 75.3 | | 1,030.7 | 952.8 | 74.4 | | 1,027.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC amortization of deferred debt | | | 257.2 | 257.2 | | | 257.2 | 257.2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
2017 Convertible Notes | 6,468.7 | | 463.0 | 6,931.7 | 6,468.7 | | 463.0 | 6,931.7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
TICC Funding LLC revolving credit facility |
2,014.6 | | 348.9 | 2,363.5 | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 13,569.4 | $ | 331.2 | $ | 1,069.1 | $ | 14,969.7 | $ | 13,410.7 | $ | 448.1 | $ | 946.4 | $ | 14,805.2 |
The aggregate accrued interest which remained payable at September 30, 2015 and December 31, 2014, was approximately $5.0 million and $2.6 million, respectively.
Debt Securitization
Notes Payable TICC CLO LLC
On August 10, 2011, TICC completed a $225.0 million debt securitization financing transaction. The Class A Notes and the subordinated notes offered in the debt securitization were issued by TICC CLO, a subsidiary of Holdings, which was in turn a direct subsidiary of TICC. The Class A Notes were secured by the assets held by the 2011 Securitization Issuer. The securitization was executed through a private placement of $101.25 million of secured notes rated AAA/Aaa by Standard & Poors Rating Service (S&P) and Moodys Investors Service Inc. (Moodys), respectively, and bearing interest at the three-month LIBOR plus 2.25%. As of October 26, 2014, Holdings retained all of the subordinated notes, which totaled $123.75 million (the 2011 Subordinated Notes), and retained all the membership interests in the 2011 Securitization Issuer. The notes were sold at a discount to par, and the amount of the discount is being amortized over the term of the notes.
On October 27, 2014, in conjunction with the revolving debt credit facility established under TICC Funding LLC, the Company redeemed all of the $101,250,000 Class A secured notes issued by TICC CLO (see discussion on Credit Facility, below). On April 27, 2015, TICC Capital Corp., as collateral manager, on behalf of TICC CLO, executed the full satisfaction and discharge of the underlying indenture of the issuer, TICC CLO.
79
The following table sets forth the components of interest expense, effective annualized average interest rates and cash paid for interest for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
TICC CLO LLC | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||
Stated interest expense | $ | | $ | 642,399 | $ | | $ | 1,907,378 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred issuance costs | | 76,251 | | 226,266 | ||||||||||||
Note discount expense | | 40,047 | | 118,788 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | $ | | $ | 758,697 | $ | | $ | 2,252,432 | ||||||||
Effective annualized average interest rate | | 2.97 | % | | 2.97 | % | ||||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | | $ | 634,405 | $ | | $ | 1,908,191 |
Notes Payable TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC
On August 23, 2012, the Company completed a $160 million debt securitization financing transaction, consisting of $120 million in secured notes and $40 million of the 2012 Subordinated Notes. On February 25, 2013 and May 28, 2013, TICC CLO 2012-1 issued additional secured notes totaling an aggregate of $120 million and 2012 Subordinated Notes totaling an aggregate of $40 million, which 2012 Subordinated Notes were purchased by us, under the accordion feature of the debt securitization which allowed, under certain circumstances and subject to the satisfaction of certain conditions, for an increase in the amount of secured and subordinated notes. It is not necessary that the Company own all or any of the notes permitted by this feature, which may affect the accounting treatment of the debt securitization financing transaction. As of September 30, 2015, the secured notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer have an aggregate face amount of $240 million and were issued in four classes. The class A-1 notes have a current face amount of $176 million, are rated AAA (sf)/Aaa (sf) by Standard & Poors Ratings Services (S&P) and Moodys Investors Service, Inc. (Moodys), respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 1.75%. The class B-1 notes have a current face amount of $20 million, are rated AA (sf)/Aa2 (sf) by S&P and Moodys, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 3.50%. The class C-1 notes have a current face amount of $23 million, are rated A (sf)/A2 (sf) by S&P and Moodys, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 4.75%. The class D-1 notes have a current face amount of $21 million, are rated BBB (sf)/Baa2 (sf) by S&P and Moodys, respectively, and bear interest at three-month LIBOR plus 5.75%. TICC presently owns all of the 2012 Subordinated Notes, which totaled $80 million as of September 30, 2015.
During a period of up to four years from the closing date, all principal collections received on the underlying collateral may be used by the 2012 Securitization Issuer to purchase new collateral under our direction in our capacity as collateral manager of the 2012 Securitization Issuer and in accordance with our investment strategy, allowing us to maintain the initial leverage in the securitization for such four-year period. All note classes are scheduled to mature on August 25, 2023.
The proceeds of the private placement of the Classes A, B, C, D and 2012 Subordinated Notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer, net of discount and debt issuance costs, were used for investment purposes. As part of the securitization, we entered into a master loan sale agreement with TICC CLO 2012-1 pursuant to which we agreed to sell or contribute certain senior secured and second lien loans (or participation interests therein) to TICC CLO 2012-1, and to purchase or otherwise acquire the 2012 Subordinated Notes. The Classes A, B, C, D and 2012 Subordinated Notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer are the secured obligations of TICC CLO 2012-1, and an indenture governing the notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer includes customary covenants and events of default.
As of September 30, 2015, there were 42 investments in portfolio companies with a total fair value of approximately $311.8 million, collateralizing the secured notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer. The pool of loans in the securitization must meet certain requirements, including asset mix and concentration, collateral coverage, term, agency rating, minimum coupon, minimum spread and sector diversity requirements.
The aggregate accrued interest payable on the notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer at September 30, 2015 was approximately $0.7 million. Deferred debt issuance costs consist of fees and expenses incurred in
80
connection with debt offerings. As of September 30, 2015, TICC had a deferred debt issuance balance of approximately $2.7 million associated with this securitization. Aggregate net discount on the notes of the 2012 Securitization Issuer at the time of issuance totaled approximately $4.9 million. These amounts are being amortized and included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the term of the debt securitization. The following table sets forth the components of interest expense, effective annualized average interest rates, and cash paid for interest of the Class A-1, B-1, C-1 and D-1 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||
Stated interest expense | $ | 1,719,273 | $ | 1,695,008 | $ | 5,086,180 | $ | 5,034,494 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred issuance costs | 86,662 | 86,662 | 257,160 | 257,160 | ||||||||||||
Note discount expense | 111,801 | 111,149 | 331,278 | 329,347 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 1,917,736 | $ | 1,892,819 | $ | 5,674,618 | $ | 5,621,001 | ||||||||
Effective annualized average interest rate | 3.17 | % | 3.13 | % | 3.16 | % | 3.13 | % | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 1,707,969 | $ | 1,656,290 | $ | 5,081,521 | $ | 5,035,160 |
Effective January 1, 2015 and through February 24, 2015, the interest charged under the securitization was based on three-month LIBOR, which was 0.233%. Effective February 25, 2015 and through May 25, 2015, the interest charged under the securitization was based on three month LIBOR, which was approximately 0.262%. Effective May 26, 2015 and through August 25, 2015, the interest charged under the securitization was based on three month LIBOR, which was approximately 0.282%. Effective August 26, 2015 and through September 30, 2015, the interest charged under the securitization was based on three month LIBOR, which was approximately 0.329%.
The classes, interest rates, spread over LIBOR, cash paid for interest, stated interest expense and note discount expense of each of the Class A-1, B-1, C-1 and D-1 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015, respectively, is as follows:
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC | Stated Interest Rate | LIBOR Spread (basis points) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Paid for Interest |
Stated Interest Expense | Note Discount Expense | Cash Paid for Interest |
Stated Interest Expense | Note Discount Expense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A-1 Notes | 2.07910 | % | 175 | $ | 904,014 | $ | 912,304 | $ | 50,035 | $ | 2,680,960 | $ | 2,688,206 | $ | 148,407 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B-1 Notes | 3.82910 | % | 350 | 191,201 | 192,143 | 13,603 | 570,071 | 569,923 | 40,315 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C-1 Notes | 5.07910 | % | 475 | 292,555 | 293,638 | 22,709 | 873,603 | 872,633 | 67,241 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class D-1 Notes | 6.07910 | % | 575 | 320,199 | 321,188 | 25,454 | 956,887 | 955,418 | 75,315 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,707,969 | $ | 1,719,273 | $ | 111,801 | $ | 5,081,521 | $ | 5,086,180 | $ | 331,278 |
The classes, interest rates, spread over LIBOR, cash paid for interest, stated interest expense and note discount expense of each of the Class A-1, B-1, C-1 and D-1 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2014, respectively, is as follows:
TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC | Stated Interest Rate | LIBOR Spread (basis points) | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Cash Paid for Interest |
Stated Interest Expense | Note Discount Expense | Cash Paid for Interest |
Stated Interest Expense | Note Discount Expense | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Class A-1 Notes | 1.98490 | % | 175 | $ | 869,946 | $ | 890,680 | $ | 49,944 | $ | 2,646,961 | $ | 2,646,473 | $ | 148,137 | |||||||||||||||||
Class B-1 Notes | 3.73490 | % | 350 | 186,358 | 190,658 | 13,536 | 566,208 | 566,153 | 40,117 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class C-1 Notes | 4.98490 | % | 475 | 286,186 | 292,729 | 22,511 | 869,160 | 869,095 | 66,654 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Class D-1 Notes | 5.98490 | % | 575 | 313,800 | 320,941 | 25,158 | 952,831 | 952,773 | 74,439 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 1,656,290 | $ | 1,695,008 | $ | 111,149 | $ | 5,035,160 | $ | 5,034,494 | $ | 329,347 |
81
The amounts, ratings and interest rates (expressed as a spread to LIBOR) of the Class A-1, B-1, C-1, D-1 and 2012 Subordinated Notes as of September 30, 2015 and 2014 are as follows:
Description | Class A-1 Notes | Class B-1 Notes | Class C-1 Notes | Class D-1 Notes | Subordinated Notes | |||||||||||||||
Type | Senior Secured Floating Rate |
Senior Secured Floating Rate |
Secured Deferrable Floating Rate |
Secured Deferrable Floating Rate |
Subordinated | |||||||||||||||
Amount Outstanding | $176,000,000 | $20,000,000 | $23,000,000 | $21,000,000 | $80,000,000 | |||||||||||||||
Moodys Rating | Aaa | Aa2 | A2 | Baa2 | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Standard & Poors Rating | AAA | AA | A | BBB | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Interest Rate | LIBOR + 1.75% | LIBOR + 3.50% | LIBOR + 4.75% | LIBOR + 5.75% | N/A | |||||||||||||||
Stated Maturity | August 25, 2023 | August 25, 2023 | August 25, 2023 | August 25, 2023 | August 25, 2023 | |||||||||||||||
Junior Classes | B-1, C-1, D-1 and Subordinated |
C-1, D-1 and Subordinated |
D-1 and Subordinated |
Subordinated | None |
TICC serves as collateral manager to the 2012 Securitization Issuer under a collateral management agreement. TICC is entitled to a deferred fee for its services as collateral manager. The deferred fee is eliminated in consolidation.
Convertible Notes
On September 26, 2012, the Company issued $105.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes and an additional $10.0 million aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes was issued on October 22, 2012 pursuant to the exercise of the initial purchasers option to purchase additional Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes bear interest at a rate of 7.50% per year, payable semi-annually in arrears on May 1 and November 1 of each year, commencing on May 1, 2013. The Convertible Notes are convertible into shares of TICCs common stock based on an initial conversion rate of 87.2448 shares of its common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which is equivalent to an initial conversion price of approximately $11.46 per share of common stock. The conversion price for the Convertible Notes will be reduced for quarterly cash dividends paid to common shares to the extent that the quarterly dividend exceeds $0.29 cents per share, subject to adjustment. The Convertible Notes mature on November 1, 2017, unless previously converted in accordance with their terms. TICC does not have the right to redeem the Convertible Notes prior to maturity. The aggregate accrued interest payable on the Convertible Notes at September 30, 2015 was approximately $3.6 million. Deferred debt issuance costs represent fees and other direct incremental costs incurred in connection with the Convertible Notes. As of September 30, 2015, the Company had a deferred debt issuance balance of approximately $1.3 million. This amount is being amortized and is included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the term of the Convertible Notes.
The following table sets forth the components of interest expense, effective annualized average interest rates and cash paid for interest of the Convertible Notes for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively:
2017 Convertible Notes | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Three Months Ended September 30, 2014 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 | Nine Months Ended September 30, 2014 | ||||||||||||
Stated interest expense | $ | 2,156,250 | $ | 2,156,250 | $ | 6,468,750 | $ | 6,468,750 | ||||||||
Amortization of deferred issuance costs | 156,028 | 156,028 | 462,997 | 462,997 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 2,312,278 | $ | 2,312,278 | $ | 6,931,747 | $ | 6,931,747 | ||||||||
Effective annualized average interest rate | 7.98 | % | 7.98 | % | 8.06 | % | 8.06 | % | ||||||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | | $ | | $ | 4,312,500 | $ | 4,312,500 |
82
In certain circumstances, the Convertible Notes will be convertible into shares of TICCs common stock at its initial conversion rate (listed below) subject to customary anti-dilution adjustments and the requirements of its indenture, at any time on or prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding the maturity date. The Company will in certain circumstances increase the conversion rate by a number of additional shares.
Convertible Notes | ||||
Conversion premium | 10.00% | |||
Closing stock price | $10.42 | |||
Closing stock price date | September 20, 2012 | |||
Initial conversion price | $11.46 | |||
Initial conversion rate (shares per one thousand dollar principal amount) | 87.2448 | |||
Maturity date | November 1, 2017 |
As of September 30, 2015, the principal amount of the Convertible Notes exceeded the value of the underlying shares multiplied by the per share closing price of the Companys common stock.
The Convertible Notes are TICCs general, unsecured obligations and rank equal in right of payment with all of TICCs existing and future senior, unsecured indebtedness and senior in right of payment to any of its subordinated indebtedness. As a result, the Convertible Notes will be effectively subordinated to TICCs existing and future secured indebtedness to the extent of the value of the assets securing such indebtedness and structurally subordinated to any existing and future liabilities and other indebtedness of its subsidiaries.
Credit Facility
On October 27, 2014, TICC Funding, a special purpose vehicle and wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a revolving credit facility (the Facility) with Citibank, N.A. Subject to certain exceptions, pricing under the Facility is based on the London interbank offered rate (LIBOR) for an interest period equal to three months plus a spread of 1.50% per annum. Pursuant to the terms of the credit agreement governing the Facility, TICC Funding has borrowed, on a revolving basis, the maximum aggregate principal amount of $150,000,000. The revolving basis period will end on October 27, 2016 (Reinvestment Period), subject to certain exceptions. Post Reinvestment Period, the Facility has a mandatory amortization schedule such that twenty-five percent (25.0%) and fifty percent (50.0%) of the principal amount outstanding as of October 27, 2016 will be due and payable, on January 18, 2017 and April 18, 2017, respectively, and the remaining principal amount outstanding and accrued and unpaid interest thereunder will be due and payable, on October 27, 2017. The Company used part of the proceeds from the Facility to redeem all of the $101.25 million of Class A secured notes issued by TICC CLO on August 10, 2011.
The Facility is secured by a pool of loans initially consisting of loans sold by TICC CLO to TICC Funding, loans sold to and contributed by the Company to TICC Funding, and loans purchased by TICC Funding from unaffiliated third parties. The Company may sell and contribute additional loans to TICC Funding from time to time. The Company will act as the collateral manager of the loans owned by TICC Funding, and has retained a residual interest through its ownership of TICC Funding.
As of September 30, 2015, there were 41 investments in portfolio companies with a total fair value of approximately $291.5 million, collateralizing the Facility. The pool of loans in TICC Funding must meet certain requirements, including asset mix and concentration, collateral coverage, term, agency rating, minimum coupon, minimum spread and sector diversity requirements.
The aggregate accrued interest payable on the Facility at September 30, 2015 was approximately $0.7 million. Deferred debt issuance costs represent fees and other direct incremental costs incurred in connection with the Facility. As of September 30, 2015, TICC had a deferred debt issuance costs balance of approximately $0.6 million. This amount is being amortized and included in interest expense in the consolidated statements of operations over the term of the Facility.
83
The following table sets forth the components of interest expense, effective annualized average interest rates and cash paid for interest of the Facility for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015:
Credit Facility | Three Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2015 |
||||||
Stated interest expense | $ | 683,752 | $ | 2,014,651 | ||||
Amortization of deferred issuance costs | 117,578 | 348,900 | ||||||
Total interest expense | $ | 801,330 | $ | 2,363,551 | ||||
Effective annualized average interest rate | 2.12 | % | 2.09 | % | ||||
Cash paid for interest | $ | 672,699 | $ | 1,807,639 |
Each of TICC CLO, TICC CLO 2012-1 and TICC Funding are consolidated subsidiaries of TICC. The Company consolidated the results of its wholly-owned subsidiaries in its consolidated financial statements as the subsidiaries are operated solely for investment activities of the Company, and the Company has substantial equity at risk. The creditors of TICC CLO, TICC CLO 2012-1 and TICC Funding have received security interests in the assets owned by TICC CLO, TICC CLO 2012-1 and TICC Funding, respectively, and such assets are not intended to be available to the creditors of TICC (or any other affiliate of TICC).
Distributions
In order to qualify as a regulated investment company and to avoid corporate level tax on the income we distribute to our stockholders, we are required, under Subchapter M of the Code, to distribute at least 90% of our ordinary income and short-term capital gains to our stockholders on an annual basis.
Effective January 1, 2015, we recorded interest from our investments in the equity class securities of CLO vehicles using the effective interest method in accordance with the provisions of ASC 325-40, Beneficial Interests in Securitized Financial Assets, based upon an estimation of an effective yield to maturity utilizing assumed cash flows, including those CLO equity investments that have not made their inaugural distribution for the relevant period end. We monitor the expected residual payments, and effective yield is determined and updated periodically, as needed. Accordingly, investment income recognized on CLO equity securities in the GAAP statement of operations differs from both the tax-basis investment income and from the cash distributions we actually received during the period. CLO entities generally constitute passive foreign investment companies and are subject to complex tax rules; the calculation of taxable income attributed to a CLO equity investment can be dramatically different from the calculation of income for financial reporting purposes. Taxable income is based upon the distributable share of earnings as determined under tax regulations for each CLO equity investment, which may be consistent with the cash flows generated by those investments, while accounting income is currently based upon an effective yield calculation. Our final taxable earnings for the year ending December 31, 2015 will not be known until our tax returns are filed, but our experience has been that cash flows have historically represented a reasonable estimate of taxable earnings. While GAAP accounting income from our CLO equity class investments for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2015 was approximately $8.6 million and $26.4 million, respectively, we received or were entitled to receive approximately $18.3 million and $56.3 million, respectively, in distributions. Our distribution policy is based upon our estimate of our taxable net investment income, which includes actual distributions from our CLO equity class investments, with further consideration given to our realized gains or losses on a taxable basis.
84
The following table reflects the cash distributions, including dividends and returns of capital, if any, per share that our Board of Directors has declared on our common stock since the beginning of 2012:
Date Declared | Record Date | Payment Date | Amount | |||||||||
Fiscal 2015 |
||||||||||||
November 2, 2015 | December 16, 2015 | December 31, 2015 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||
July 30, 2015 | September 16, 2015 | September 30, 2015 | 0.29 | |||||||||
April 27, 2015 | June 16, 2015 | June 30, 2015 | 0.29 | |||||||||
February 19, 2015 | March 17, 2015 | March 31, 2015 | 0.27 | |||||||||
Total (2015) | $ | 1.14 | ||||||||||
Fiscal 2014 |
||||||||||||
October 30, 2014 | December 17, 2014 | December 31, 2014 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||
July 31, 2014 | September 16, 2014 | September 30, 2014 | 0.29 | |||||||||
May 1, 2014 | June 16, 2014 | June 28, 2014 | 0.29 | |||||||||
March 5, 2014 | March 25, 2014 | March 29, 2014 | 0.29 | |||||||||
Total (2014) | $ | 1.16 | (1) | |||||||||
Fiscal 2013 |
||||||||||||
October 29, 2013 | December 17, 2013 | December 31, 2013 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||
July 30, 2013 | September 16, 2013 | September 30, 2013 | 0.29 | |||||||||
April 30, 2013 | June 14, 2013 | June 28, 2013 | 0.29 | |||||||||
February 28, 2013 | March 22, 2013 | March 29, 2013 | 0.29 | |||||||||
Total (2013) | $ | 1.16 | (2) | |||||||||
Fiscal 2012 |
||||||||||||
November 1, 2012 | December 17, 2012 | December 31, 2012 | $ | 0.29 | ||||||||
July 26, 2012 | September 14, 2012 | September 28, 2012 | 0.29 | |||||||||
May 2, 2012 | June 15, 2012 | June 29, 2012 | 0.27 | |||||||||
March 1, 2012 | March 21, 2012 | March 30, 2012 | 0.27 | |||||||||
Total (2012) | $ | 1.12 | (2) |
(1) | Includes a taxable return of capital of approximately $0.16 per share for tax purposes. |
(2) | Distributions were funded from undistributed taxable earnings and profits. |
Related Parties
We have a number of business relationships with affiliated or related parties, including the following:
| We have entered into the Investment Advisory Agreement with TICC Management. TICC Management is controlled by BDC Partners, its managing member. In addition to BDC Partners, TICC Management is owned by Charles M. Royce, our non-executive Chairman, who holds a minority, non-controlling interest in TICC Management as the non-managing member. BDC Partners, as the managing member of TICC Management, manages the business and internal affairs of TICC Management. In addition, BDC Partners provides us with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to the Administration Agreement. |
| Messrs. Cohen and Rosenthal currently serve as Chief Executive Officer and President, respectively, of Oxford Lane Capital Corp., a non-diversified closed-end management investment company that invests primarily in equity and junior debt tranches of collateralized loan obligation vehicles, and its investment adviser, Oxford Lane Management, LLC. BDC Partners provides Oxford Lane Capital Corp. with office facilities and administrative services pursuant to an administration agreement and also serves as the managing member of Oxford Lane Management, LLC. In addition, Bruce L. Rubin serves as the Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Corporate Secretary of Oxford Lane Capital Corp. and Chief Financial Officer and Treasurer of Oxford Lane Management, LLC. |
85
BDC Partners has adopted a written policy with respect to the allocation of investment opportunities between us and Oxford Lane Capital Corp. in view of the potential conflicts of interest raised by the relationships described above.
In the ordinary course of business, we may enter into transactions with portfolio companies that may be considered related party transactions. In order to ensure that we do not engage in any prohibited transactions with any persons affiliated with us, we have implemented certain policies and procedures whereby our executive officers screen each of our transactions for any possible affiliations between the proposed portfolio investment, us, companies controlled by us and our employees and directors. We will not enter into any agreements unless and until we are satisfied that doing so will not raise concerns under the 1940 Act or, if such concerns exist, we have taken appropriate actions to seek board review and approval or exemptive relief for such transaction. Our Board of Directors reviews these procedures on an annual basis.
We have also adopted a Code of Ethics which applies to, among others, our senior officers, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as well as all of our officers, directors and employees. Our Code of Ethics requires that all employees and directors avoid any conflict, or the appearance of a conflict, between an individuals personal interests and our interests. Pursuant to our Code of Ethics, each employee and director must disclose any conflicts of interest, or actions or relationships that might give rise to a conflict, to our Chief Compliance Officer. Our Audit Committee is charged with approving any waivers under our Code of Ethics. As required by the NASDAQ Global Select Market corporate governance listing standards, the Audit Committee of our Board of Directors is also required to review and approve any transactions with related parties (as such term is defined in Item 404 of Regulation S-K).
Information concerning related party transactions is included in the consolidated financial statements and related notes, appearing elsewhere in this quarterly report on Form 10-Q.
86
RECENT DEVELOPMENTS
Distributions
On November 2, 2015, the Board of Directors declared a distribution of $0.29 per share for the fourth quarter, payable on December 31, 2015 to shareholders of record as of December 16, 2015.
Potential Sale of Companys Investment Advisor
Subsequent to the end of the fiscal quarter ended September 30, 2015, there have been additional developments in connection with the Transaction and the Special Meeting.
On October 5, 2015, TPG filed a Form DEFC 14A, a definitive solicitation of proxies in opposition to the New Advisory Agreement and other proposals to be voted on at the Special meeting.
On October 8, 2015, BSP announced its intention to support a tender offer or share repurchase program of between $50 million and $100 million, with the tender offer to be funded by BSP, if the Transaction closes.
On October 8, 2015, NexPoint brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (the Court) against the Company, the Companys Board of Directors and the Companys President. NexPoints complaint alleged that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, breached the fiduciary duty of candor under Maryland law, and breached the Companys Bylaws by failing to recognize NexPoints director nominees. NexPoint sought (i) a temporary restraining order prohibiting the Company from canceling or rescheduling its October 27, 2015 Special Meeting or altering the size or composition of the Board of Directors and (ii) a preliminary injunction requiring the Company to issue additional disclosures and recognize NexPoints six director nominees.
On October 8, 2015, the Court issued a temporary restraining order pending a hearing on NexPoints preliminary injunction motion, which was held on October 16, 2015.
On October 9, 2015, NexPoint filed a Form DEFC 14A, a definitive solicitation of proxies in opposition to the New Advisory Agreement and the Companys other proposals to be voted on at the Special Meeting, and proposed a slate of six director nominees for consideration at the Special Meeting.
On October 23, 2015, the Court denied NexPoints preliminary injunction motion insofar as it sought to require the Company to recognize NexPoints director nominees, and granted it in part with respect to certain of NexPoints disclosure claims. The Court ordered (the Order) the Company to correct certain statements made in prior proxy materials and to provide certain additional disclosures. The Order set a schedule for the defendants to file a draft of corrective proxy materials with the Court, for NexPoint to state its agreement or any objections to those proposed disclosures, and for the Court to resolve any disputes and then set (a) a date by which defendants must file and mail to the Companys stockholders the finalized corrective proxy materials, and (b) the earliest date on which the Company may hold the Special Meeting.
On October 26, 2015, NexPoint filed a motion seeking reconsideration of the Order. Defendants filed an opposition to NexPoints motion for reconsideration on November 3, 2015 and NexPoint filed a reply brief on November 6, 2015.
On October 27, 2015, defendants filed draft corrective proxy materials with the Court and made them available to the Companys stockholders. On November 3, 2015, NexPoint filed their proposed corrective proxy materials for the Company with the Court, and on November 4, 2015, defendants responded to NexPoints objections to the corrective proxy materials that defendants proposed.
On November 9, 2015, the Court scheduled a hearing for November 13, 2015 to address NexPoint's motion for reconsideration and the proposed corrective disclosures submitted by the Company and NexPoint.
On October 27, 2015, two stockholders of the Company filed a putative class action complaint in the Court against the Company, the Board, and the Companys President. Plaintiffs complaint alleged that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and breached the fiduciary duty of candor under Maryland law. The complaint sought (i) an injunction requiring the defendants to hold the Special Meeting only after corrective information has been disseminated to the Companys stockholders, and (ii) an injunction requiring the defendants to issue additional corrective proxy materials. On November 3, these purported stockholders filed
87
proposed corrective proxy materials in the NexPoint lawsuit, where they are not a party. Defendants addressed plaintiffs filing in their November 4, 2015 reponse to NexPoints objections noted above.
On October 27, 2015, the Company entered into an agreement with Raging Capital Master Fund, LTD, Raging Capital Management, LLC, and William C. Martin (the Raging Capital Group) under which the Raging Capital Group agreed to vote all of its shares in favor of all TICC proposals at the Special Meeting, including voting for the New Advisory Agreement and for the election of the six new directors named in TICCs Proxy Statement. The Raging Capital Group is TICCs largest stockholder as of the record date for the Special Meeting. TICC also agreed that if TICCs proposals are approved at the Special Meeting, it will appoint an additional independent director, recommended by the Raging Capital Group, to the TICC Board. If TICCs proposals are approved at the Special Meeting, this agreement would expand the number of independent directors on the TICC Board to eight.
In addition, on October 27, 2015, BSP agreed to further reduce the total fees to be paid by TICC under the New Advisory Agreement by waiving 0.25% of its 1.50% annual management fee for a period of twenty-four months after the closing of the Transaction while the portfolio is being transitioned.
See the proxy materials filed by the Company, NexPoint, and TPG since September 3, 2015 for more information about the Transaction and the Special Meeting.
Share Repurchase Program
On November 5, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized a new program for the purpose of repurchasing up to $75 million worth of our common stock. Under the new repurchase program, we may, but are not obligated to, repurchase our outstanding common stock in the open market from time to time through June 30, 2016.
88
ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK.
We are subject to financial market risks, including changes in interest rates. As of September 30, 2015, one debt investment in our portfolio was at a fixed rate, and the remaining sixty-two debt investments were at variable rates, representing approximately $0.6 million and $700.3 million in principal debt, respectively. At September 30, 2015, all of our variable rate investments were income producing. The variable rates are based upon the five-year Treasury note, the Prime rate or LIBOR, and, in the case of our bilateral investments, are generally reset annually, whereas our non-bilateral investments generally reset quarterly. We expect that future debt investments will generally be made at variable rates. Many of the variable rate investments contain floors.
To illustrate the potential impact of a change in the underlying interest rate on our net investment income as it pertains to our debt portfolio, we have assumed a 1% increase in the underlying five-year Treasury note, the Prime rate or LIBOR, and no other change in our portfolio as of September 30, 2015. We have also assumed outstanding variable rate borrowings of $390 million. Under this analysis, net investment income would decrease by $2.0 million on an annualized basis, reflecting the amount of investments in our portfolio which have implied floors that would be unaffected by a 1% change in the underlying interest rate. However, if the increase in rates was more significant, such as 5%, the net effect on net investment income would be an increase of approximately $9.9 million. To the extent that the rate underlying certain investments, as well as our borrowings, is at an historic low, it is not possible for the underlying rate to decrease by 1% or 5%. If the underlying rate decreased to 0%, it would have a minimal effect on net investment income. Although management believes that this analysis is indicative of our existing interest rate sensitivity, it does not adjust for changes in the credit quality, size and composition of our portfolio, and other business developments, including a change in the level of our borrowings, that could affect the net increase (or decrease) in net assets resulting from operations. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the results under this hypothetical analysis.
In addition, to illustrate the impact of a change in the underlying interest rate on our total estimated distributable net investment income as it pertains to our CLO equity investments, we have assumed a 1% increase in the underlying three-month LIBOR, and no other change in our CLO portfolio, or to any of the credit, spread, default rate or other factors, as of September 30, 2015. Under this analysis, the effect on estimated distributable net investment income would be a decrease of approximately $22.8 million on an annualized basis, reflecting the portfolio assets held within these CLO vehicles which have implied floors that would be unaffected by a 1% change in the underlying interest rate, compared to the debt carried by those CLO vehicles which are at variable rates and which would be affected by a change in three-month LIBOR. If the increase in three-month LIBOR was more significant, such as 5%, the net effect on estimated distributable net investment income would be a decrease of approximately $10.6 million. Although management believes that this analysis is indicative of our existing interest rate sensitivity, it does not adjust for changes in any of the other assumptions that effect the return on CLO equity investments, both positively and negatively (and which could accompany changes to the three-month LIBOR rate), such as default rates, recovery rates, prepayment rates and reinvestment rates, that could affect the net increase (or decrease) in net assets resulting from operations. Accordingly, no assurances can be given that actual results would not differ materially from the results under this hypothetical analysis.
We may in the future hedge against interest rate fluctuations by using standard hedging instruments such as futures, options and forward contracts. While hedging activities may insulate us against adverse changes in interest rates, they may also limit our ability to participate in the benefits of lower interest rates with respect to the investments in our portfolio with fixed interest rates.
89
ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES.
(a) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
As of September 30, 2015 (the end of the period covered by this report), we, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, our management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective and provided reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in our periodic SEC filings is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. However, in evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, and management necessarily was required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of such possible controls and procedures.
(b) Changes in Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
There have been no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2015 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
90
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
On October 8, 2015, NexPoint brought suit in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut (the Court) against the Company, the Companys Board of Directors and the Companys President. NexPoints complaint alleged that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, breached the fiduciary duty of candor under Maryland law, and breached the Companys Bylaws by failing to recognize NexPoints director nominees. NexPoint sought (i) a temporary restraining order prohibiting the Company from canceling or rescheduling its October 27, 2015 Special Meeting or altering the size or composition of the Board of Directors and (ii) a preliminary injunction requiring the Company to issue additional disclosures and recognize NexPoints six director nominees.
On October 8, 2015, the Court issued a temporary restraining order pending a hearing on NexPoints preliminary injunction motion, which was held on October 16, 2015.
On October 23, 2015, the Court denied NexPoints preliminary injunction motion insofar as it sought to require the Company to recognize NexPoints director nominees, and granted it in part with respect to certain of NexPoints disclosure claims. The Court ordered (the Order) the Company to correct certain statements made in prior proxy materials and to provide certain additional disclosures. The Order set a schedule for the defendants to file a draft of corrective proxy materials with the Court, for NexPoint to state its agreement or any objections to those proposed disclosures, and for the Court to resolve any disputes and then set (a) a date by which defendants must file and mail to the Companys stockholders the finalized corrective proxy materials, and (b) the earliest date on which the Company may hold the Special Meeting.
On October 26, 2015, NexPoint filed a motion seeking reconsideration of the Order. Defendants filed an opposition to NexPoints motion for reconsideration on November 3, 2015 and NexPoint filed a reply brief on November 6, 2015.
On October 27, 2015, defendants filed draft corrective proxy materials with the Court and made them available to the Companys stockholders. On November 3, 2015, NexPoint filed their proposed corrective proxy materials for the Company with the Court, and on November 4, 2015, defendants responded to NexPoints objections to the corrective proxy materials that defendants proposed.
On November 9, 2015, the Court scheduled a hearing for November 13, 2015 to address NexPoint's motion for reconsideration and the proposed corrective disclosures submitted by the Company and NexPoint.
On October 27, 2015, two stockholders of the Company filed a putative class action complaint in the Court against the Company, the Board, and the Companys President. Plaintiffs complaint alleged that the defendants violated Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and breached the fiduciary duty of candor under Maryland law. The complaint sought (i) an injunction requiring the defendants to hold the Special Meeting only after corrective information has been disseminated to the Companys stockholders, and (ii) an injunction requiring the defendants to issue additional corrective proxy materials. On November 3, these purported stockholders filed proposed corrective proxy materials in the NexPoint lawsuit, where they are not a party. Defendants addressed plaintiffs filing in their November 4, 2015 reponse to NexPoints objections noted above.
While the final outcome with respect to this litigation cannot be predicted with certainty, in the opinion of management after consultation with external legal counsel, any liability that may arise from such contingencies would not have a material adverse effect on the financial position, results of operations, or liquidity of the Company.
ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS.
In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. The risks described in our Annual Report on Form 10-K are not the only risks facing our company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial also may materially and adversely affect our business, financial condition and/or operating results. Other than the risk
91
factors set forth below, there have been no material changes during the nine months ended September 30, 2015 to the risk factors discussed in Item 1A. Risk Factors in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2014.
We are dependent upon TICC Managements key management personnel for our future success.
Should the Transaction close, Jonathan H. Cohen, Saul B. Rosenthal, and Charles M. Royce will be replaced by senior management from BSP. We currently depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contacts of the senior management of TICC Management and will depend on the diligence, skill and network of business contexts of the senior management of BSP. The senior management, together with other investment professionals, will evaluate, negotiate, structure, close, monitor and service our investments. Our future success will depend to a significant extent on the continued service and coordination of the senior management team. The departure of senior management could have a material adverse effect on our ability to achieve our investment objective.
Our financial condition and results of operations will depend on our ability to manage our existing portfolio and future growth effectively.
Should the Transaction close, our ability to achieve our investment objective will depend on the ability of BSP to manage our existing investment portfolio and to grow, which will depend, in turn, on BSPs ability to identify, analyze, invest in and finance companies that meet our investment criteria, and our ability to raise and retain debt and equity capital. Accomplishing this result on a cost-effective basis is largely a function of BSPs structuring of the investment process, its ability to provide competent, attentive and efficient services to us and our access to financing on acceptable terms. While we are optimistic, our potential new relationship with BSP remains untested. BSP will need to continue to hire, train, supervise and manage new employees. Failure to manage our future growth effectively could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Our business model depends to a significant extent upon strong referral relationships with financial sponsors, and the inability of the senior investment professionals of our investment adviser to maintain or develop these relationships, or the failure of these relationships to generate investment opportunities, could adversely affect our business.
Should the Transaction close, we will be advised by BSP. We expect that the principals of BSP will maintain and develop their relationships with financial sponsors, and we will rely to a significant extent upon these relationships to provide us with potential investment opportunities. If the senior investment professionals of BSP fail to maintain their existing relationships or develop new relationships with other sponsors or sources of investment opportunities, we will not be able to grow our investment portfolio. In addition, individuals with whom the senior investment professionals of BSP have relationships are not obligated to provide us with investment opportunities, and, therefore, there is no assurance that such relationships will generate investment opportunities for us. If BSP is unable to source investment opportunities, we may hold a greater percentage of our assets in cash than anticipated, which could impact potential returns on our portfolio.
Should the Transaction not close, our investment adviser can resign on 60 days notice, and we may not be able to find a suitable replacement within that time, resulting in a disruption in our operations that could adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.
Our investment adviser has the right, under our investment advisory agreement, to resign at any time upon 60 days written notice, whether we have found a replacement or not. If our investment adviser resigns, we may not be able to find a new investment adviser or hire internal management with similar expertise and ability to provide the same or equivalent services on acceptable terms within 60 days, or at all. If we are unable to do so quickly, our operations are likely to experience a disruption, our financial condition, business and results of operations as well as our ability to pay distributions are likely to be adversely affected and the market price of our shares may decline. In addition, the coordination of our internal management and investment activities is likely to suffer if we are unable to identify and reach an agreement with a single institution or group of executives having the expertise possessed by our investment adviser and its affiliates. Even if we are able to retain comparable management, whether internal or external, the integration of such management and their lack of familiarity with our investment objective may result in additional costs and time delays that may adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.
92
We are currently subject to litigation arising out of the Transaction that could adversely affect our financial condition, business and results of operations.
In connection with the Transaction and the Special Meeting, we have been subjected to litigation. The outcome of any such proceedings may materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results, and may continue without resolution for long periods of time. Any litigation may consume substantial amounts of our managements time and attention, and that time and the devotion of these resources to litigation may, at times, be disproportionate to the amounts at stake in the litigation.
The SEC has raised questions regarding certain non-traditional investments, including investments in CLO.
The staff of the Division of Investment Management has, in correspondence with certain business development companies, raised questions about the level and special risks of investments in CLOs. While it is not possible to predict what conclusions the staff will reach in these areas, or what recommendations the staff might make to the SEC, the imposition of limitations on investments by business development companies in CLOs could adversely impact our ability to implement our investment strategy and/or our ability to raise capital through public offerings, or cause us to take certain actions with potential negative impacts on our financial condition and results of operations. We are unable at this time to assess the likelihood or timing of any such regulatory development.
ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS.
Sales of Unregistered Equity Securities
We did not engage in unregistered sales of equity securities during the nine months ended September 30, 2015, and we did not issue shares of common stock under our dividend reinvestment plan.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
On December 18, 2014, our board of directors authorized a repurchase program to be in place until the earlier of June 30, 2015 or until $50 million of our outstanding shares of common stock were repurchased. Under the repurchase program, we were able to, but were not obligated to, repurchase our outstanding common stock in the open market from time to time provided that we complied with the prohibitions under our Insider Trading Policies and Procedures and the guidelines specified in Rule 10b-18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, including certain price, market volume and timing constraints. In addition, repurchases were conducted in accordance with the 1940 Act. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, we repurchased 315,783 shares at the weighted average price of approximately $7.56 per share, inclusive of commissions. This represents a discount of approximately 13.3% of the net asset value per share at March 31, 2015. The total dollar amount of shares repurchased in this program was approximately $2.4 million, through the programs expiration on June 30, 2015. No shares were repurchased during the three months ended September 30, 2015. As of September 30, 2015, the Company did not have an active share repurchase program.
ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES.
None.
ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES.
Not applicable.
ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION.
None.
93
ITEM 6. EXHIBITS.
The following exhibits are filed as part of this report or hereby incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the SEC:
3.1 | Articles of Incorporation (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on September 23, 2003). | |
3.2 | Articles of Amendment (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed December 3, 2007). | |
3.3 | Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3.1 to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on April 21, 2015). | |
4.1 | Form of Share Certificate (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants Registration Statement on Form N-2 (File No. 333-109055), filed on September 23, 2003). | |
4.2 | Indenture, dated September 26, 2012, relating to the 7.50% Senior Convertible Notes due 2017, by and between the Registrant and the Bank of New York Mellon, as trustee (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 4.1 to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on September 27, 2012). | |
10.1 | Investment Advisory Agreement between Registrant and TICC Management, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on July 1, 2011). | |
10.2 | Custodian Agreement between Registrant and U.S. Bank National Association (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants report on Form 10-Q filed on November 6, 2014). | |
10.3 | Amended and Restated Administration Agreement between Registrant and BDC Partners, LLC. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants quarterly report on Form 10-Q filed on May 10, 2012). | |
10.4 | Second Amended and Restated Distribution Reinvestment Plan (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants report on Form 10-K filed on March 4, 2015). | |
10.5 | Purchase Agreement, dated August 13, 2012, by and among TICC Capital Corp., TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC and Guggenheim Securities, LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2012). | |
10.6 | Master Loan Sale Agreement, dated August 23, 2012, by and among TICC Capital Corp. and TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2012). | |
10.7 | Indenture, dated August 23, 2012, by and between TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2012). | |
10.8 | Collateral Management Agreement, dated August 23, 2012, by and between TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC and TICC Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2012). | |
10.9 | Collateral Administration Agreement, dated August 23, 2012, by and among TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC, TICC Capital Corp. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association (Incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.5 to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on August 23, 2012). | |
10.10 | Upsize Purchase Agreement, dated January 24, 2013, by and among TICC Capital Corp., TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC and Guggenheim Securities, LLC (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on February 26, 2013). | |
10.11 | Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement, dated February 25, 2013, by and among TICC Capital Corp. and TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on February 26, 2013). | |
10.12 | Second Upsize Purchase Agreement, dated May 21, 2013, by and among TICC Capital Corp., TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC and Guggenheim Securities, LLC (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2013). |
94
10.13 | Subordinated Note Purchase Agreement, dated May 28, 2013, by and among TICC Capital Corp. and TICC CLO 2012-1 LLC (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on May 29, 2013). | |
10.14 | Form of Credit and Security Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, among TICC Funding, LLC, the lenders from time to time party thereto, Citibank, N.A., The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association, and TICC Capital Corp. (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2014). | |
10.15 | Form of Sale, Contribution and Master Participation Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, by and among TICC Capital Corp. and TICC Funding, LLC (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2014). | |
10.16 | Form of Collateral Administration Agreement, dated as of October 27, 2014, by and among TICC Funding, LLC, TICC Capital Corp. and The Bank of New York Mellon Trust Company, National Association (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants report on Form 8-K filed on October 28, 2014). | |
10.17 | Agreement, dated October 27, 2015, by and among the Registrant and the Raging Capital Group (Incorporated by reference to the Registrants report on From 8-K filed on October 27, 2015). | |
11 | Computation of Per Share Earnings (included in the notes to the financial statements contained in this report). | |
31.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
31.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
32.1 | Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
32.2 | Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to section 906 of The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. |
95
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
TICC CAPITAL CORP. | ||
Date: November 9, 2015 | By: /s/ Jonathan H. Cohen | |
Date: November 9, 2015 | By: /s/ Bruce L. Rubin |
96