PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

x	QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

¨	TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number 000-29829

PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Washington

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

91-1815009

(IRS Employer Identification No.)

1101 S. Boone Street

Aberdeen, Washington 98520-5244

(360) 533-8870

(Address, including zip code, and telephone number,

including area code, of Registrant's principal executive offices)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days:

Yes x No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes ¨ No ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, accelerated filer or non-accelerated filer (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Large accelerated filer ¨ Accelerated Filer x Non-accelerated filer ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x

The number of shares of the issuer's common stock, par value $1.00 per share, outstanding as of July 31, 2009, was 9,260,737 shares.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I	FINANCIAL INFORMATION	3

ITEM 1.	FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	3

	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS JUNE 30, 2009 AND DECEMBER 31, 2008	3

	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME THREE AND SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008	4

	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND 2008	5

	CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY SIX MONTHS ENDED JUNE 30, 2009 AND YEAR ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2008	6

	NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS	7

ITEM 2.	MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS	19

ITEM 3.	QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK	29

ITEM 4.	CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES	30

PART II	OTHER INFORMATION	30

ITEM 1.	LEGAL PROCEEDINGS	30

ITEM 1A.	RISK FACTORS	30

ITEM 2.	UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS	31

ITEM 3.	DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES	31

ITEM 4.	SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS	31

ITEM 5.	OTHER INFORMATION	31

ITEM 6.	EXHIBITS	31

	SIGNATURES	31

PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION

ITEM 1 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets

June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008

(Dollars in thousands) (Unaudited)

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
Assets
Cash and due from banks	$	16,025		$	16,182
Interest bearing deposits in banks		11,704			582
Federal funds sold		29,350			775
Investment securities available-for-sale (amortized cost of $51,710 and $52,930)		49,324			49,493
Investment securities held-to-maturity (fair value of $7,714 and $6,418)		7,623			6,386
Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost		3,183			2,170
Loans held for sale		14,837			11,486

Loans		481,310			486,318
Allowance for credit losses		10,203			7,623
Loans, net		471,107			478,695

Premises and equipment		16,477			16,631
Foreclosed real estate		10,985			6,810
Accrued interest receivable		2,672			2,772
Cash surrender value of life insurance		15,959			15,718
Goodwill		11,282			11,282
Other intangible assets		1,516			1,587
Other assets		6,982			5,266

Total assets	$	669,026		$	625,835

Liabilities and Shareholders' Equity
Deposits:
Demand, non-interest bearing	$	80,175		$	80,066
Savings and interest-bearing demand		202,507			213,277
Time, interest-bearing		283,662			217,964
Total deposits		566,344			511,307

Accrued interest payable		1,140			1,002
Secured borrowings		1,001			1,354
Short-term borrowings		7,500			23,500
Long-term borrowings		24,000			22,500
Junior subordinated debentures		13,403			13,403
Other liabilities		2,415			2,695
Total liabilities		615,803			575,761

Commitments and Contingencies (Note 6)

Shareholders' Equity
Common Stock (par value $1); 25,000,000 shares authorized; 8,435,786 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and 7,317,430 at December 31, 2008		8,436			7,318
Additional paid-in capital		35,578			31,626
Retained earnings		11,358			13,937
Accumulated other comprehensive loss		(2,149	)		(2,807	)
Total shareholders' equity		53,223			50,074
Total liabilities and shareholders' equity	$	669,026		$	625,835

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Income

Three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Dollars in thousands, except per share data)

(Unaudited)

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Interest and dividend income
Loans	$	7,454		$	7,681		$	14,977		$	16,033
Investment securities and FHLB dividends		718			593			1,473			1,169
Deposits with banks and federal funds sold		22			5			28			14
Total interest and dividend income		8,194			8,279			16,478			17,216

Interest Expense
Deposits		2,556			2,214			4,841			5,208
Other borrowings		488			563			1,019			1,061
Total interest expense		3,044			2,777			5,860			6,269

Net Interest Income		5,150			5,502			10,618			10,947
Provision for credit losses		3,587			2,228			5,374			2,354
Net interest income after provision for credit losses		1,563			3,274			5,244			8,593

Non-interest Income
Service charges on deposits		405			401			822			775
Gain on sales of loans		1,382			444			2,577			893
Gain on sale of investments available-for-sale		—			—			303			—
Other operating income		467			447			827			834
Total non-interest income		2,254			1,292			4,529			2,502

Non-interest Expense
Salaries and employee benefits		3,489			3,269			6,949			6,411
Occupancy and equipment		670			693			1,326			1,387
Write-down of foreclosed real estate		1,734			—			2,517			—
Professional services		227			226			405			365
FDIC and State assessments		443			39			623			57
Data processing		301			112			548			165
Other		1,266			1,166			2,384			2,277
Total non-interest expense		8,130			5,505			14,752			10,662

Income (loss) before income taxes		(4,313	)		(939	)		(4,979	)		433
Provision (benefit) for income taxes		(2,048	)		(266	)		(2,400	)		58

Net Income (Loss)		(2,265	)	$	(673	)	$	(2,579	)	$	375

Earnings (loss) per common share:
Basic	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.35	)	$	0.05
Diluted		(0.31	)		(0.09	)		(0.35	)		0.05
Weighted Average shares outstanding:
Basic		7,335,496			7,312,054			7,284,984			7,305,322
Diluted		7,335,496			7,344,814			7,284,984			7,335,902

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

Six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	2009			2008
OPERATING ACTIVITIES
Net income (loss)	$	(2,579	)	$	375
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
Provision for credit losses		5,374			2,354
Depreciation and amortization		785			785
Deferred income taxes		(1	)		—
Origination of loans held for sale		(162,089	)		(50,735	)
Proceeds of loans held for sale		161,375			53,416
Gain on sales of loans		(2,577	)		(893	)
Gain on sale of investments available for sale		(303	)		—
Decrease in accrued interest receivable		100			585
Increase (decrease) in accrued interest payable		138			(393	)
Write-down of foreclosed real estate		3,204			61
Other, net		(2,421	)		(1,538	)

Net cash provided by operating activities		1,006			4,017

INVESTING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in federal funds sold		(28,575	)		—
Net increase in interest bearing balances with banks		(11,122	)		(213	)
Purchase of securities held-to-maturity		(1,314	)		(369	)
Purchase of securities available-for-sale		(10,056	)		(6,533	)
Proceeds from maturities of investments held-to-maturity		75			77
Proceeds from sales of securities available-for-sale		6,679			—
Proceeds from maturities of securities available-for-sale		3,919			3,473
Net increase in loans		(5,198	)		(18,123	)
Additions to premises and equipment		(466	)		(1,953	)

Net cash used in investing activities		(46,058	)		(23,641	)

FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Net increase in deposits		55,037			955
Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings		(17,500	)		21,405
Net decrease in secured borrowings		(353	)		(30	)
Proceeds from issuance of long-term borrowings		3,000			6,500
Repayments of long-term borrowings		—			(5,000	)
Issuance of common stock		5,044			624
Repurchase and retirement of common stock		—			(26	)
Payment of cash dividends		(333	)		(4,955	)

Net cash provided by financing activities		44,895			19,473

Net decrease in cash and due from banks		(157	)		(151	)

Cash and due from Banks
Beginning of period		16,182			15,044

End of period	$	16,025		$	14,893

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
Cash payments for:
Interest	$	5,722		$	6,662
Income taxes		90			1,073

SUPPLEMENTAL SCHEDULE OF NONCASH INVESTING AND FINANCING ACTIVITIES
Change in fair value of securities available-for-sale, net of tax	$	693		$	(522	)
Foreclosed real estate acquired in settlement of loans		(7,379	)		(341	)
Reclass of long-term borrowings to short-term borrowings		1,500			2,500

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Condensed Consolidated Statements of Shareholders' Equity

Six months ended June 30, 2009 and year ended December 31, 2008

(Dollars in thousands)

(Unaudited)

	Shares of Common Stock			Common Stock			Additional Paid-in Capital			Retained Earnings			Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss			Total

Balance January 1, 2008		6,606,545		$	6,607		$	27,163		$	17,807		$	(878	)	$	50,699

Other comprehensive income (loss):
Net income											951						951
Unrealized holding loss on securities of $2,106 (net of tax of $1,084) less reclassification adjustment for net losses included in net income of $109 (net of tax of $56)														(1,997	)		(1,997	)
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs and net (gains)/losses														68			68
Comprehensive income (loss)																	(978	)

Stock options exercised		6,656			6			52									58
Issuance of common stock		41,672			42			524									566
Common stock repurchased and retired		(2,300	)		(2	)		(24	)								(26	)
Stock compensation expense								87									87
Cash dividends declared ($0.05 per share											(333	)					(333	)
Stock dividends declared (10%)		664,857			665			3,823			(4,488	)					—
Tax benefit from exercise of stock options								1									1

Balance December 31, 2008		7,317,430		$	7,318		$	31,626		$	13,937		$	(2,807	)	$	50,074

Other comprehensive income:
Net loss											(2,579	)					(2,579	)
Unrealized holding gain on securities of $893 (net of tax of $589) less reclassification adjustment for net gains included in net income of $200 (net of tax of $103)														693			693
Amortization of unrecognized prior service costs and net (gains)/losses														(35	)		(35	)
Comprehensive loss																	(1,921	)

Issuance of common stock		1,118,356			1,118			3,926									5,044
Stock compensation expense								26									26

Balance June 30, 2009		8,435,786		$	8,436		$	35,578		$	11,358		$	(2,149	)	$	53,223

See notes to condensed consolidated financial statements.

PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements

(Unaudited)

(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)

Note 1 – Basis of Presentation

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared by Pacific Financial Corporation ("Pacific" or the "Company") in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for interim financial information and with instructions to Form 10-Q. Accordingly, these financial statements do not include all of the information and footnotes required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, adjustments (consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the six months ended June 30, 2009, are not necessarily indicative of the results anticipated for the year ending December 31, 2009. Certain information and footnote disclosures included in the Company's consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2008, have been condensed or omitted from this report. Accordingly, these statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008.

The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

We have evaluated subsequent events through the date of this filing. We do not believe there are any material subsequent events other than those disclosed that require further disclosure.

Note 2 – Earnings per Share

The following table illustrates the computation of basic and diluted earnings (loss) per share.

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Month Ended June 30,
	2009			2008			2009			2008
Basic:
Net income (loss)	$	(2,265	)	$	(673	)	$	(2,579	)	$	375
Weighted average shares outstanding		7,335,496			7,312,054			7,284,984			7,305,322
Basic earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.35	)	$	0.05

Diluted:
Net income (loss)	$	(2,265	)	$	(673	)	$	(2,579	)	$	375
Weighted average shares outstanding		7,335,496			7,312,054			7,284,984			7,305,322
Effect of dilutive stock options		—			32,760			—			30,580
Weighted average shares outstanding assuming dilution		7,335,496			7,344,814			7,284,984			7,335,902
Diluted earnings (loss) per share	$	(0.31	)	$	(0.09	)	$	(0.35	)	$	0.05

As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, there were 657,852 and 388,190 shares, respectively, subject to outstanding options and 278,128 of warrants outstanding to acquire common stock with exercise prices in excess of the current market value. These shares are not included in the table above, as exercise of these options would not be dilutive to shareholders.

Note 3 – Investment Securities

Investment securities consist principally of short and intermediate term debt instruments issued by the U.S. Treasury, other U.S. government agencies, state and local government units, and other corporations.

	Amortized Cost		Unrealized Gains		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value
Securities Held-to-Maturity

June 30, 2009
State and municipal securities	$	7,064	$	76	$	6	$	7,134
Mortgage-backed securities		559		21		—		580

Total	$	7,623	$	97	$	6	$	7,714

December 31, 2008
State and municipal securities	$	5,750	$	40	$	12	$	5,778
Mortgage-backed securities		636		5		1		640

Total	$	6,386	$	45	$	13	$	6,418

Securities Available-for-Sale

June 30, 2009
U.S. Government securities	$	1,941	$	61	$	—	$	2,002
State and municipal securities		19,630		347		300		19,677
Mortgage-backed securities		28,117		122		2,638		25,601
Corporate securities		2,022		29		7		2,044

Total	$	51,710	$	559	$	2,945	$	49,324

December 31, 2008
U.S. Government securities	$	1,671	$	88	$	—	$	1,759
State and municipal securities		19,876		158		450		19,584
Mortgage-backed securities		30,370		330		3,495		27,205
Corporate securities		1,013		—		68		945

Total	$	52,930	$	576	$	4,013	$	49,493

Unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in continuous unrealized loss position, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are summarized as follows:

	Less than 12 Months				12 months or More				Total
	Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses		Fair Value		Unrealized Losses
Held-to-Maturity

June 30 2009
State and municipal securities	$	384	$	6	$	—	$	—	$	384	$	6
Mortgage-backed securities		—		—		—		—		—		—
Total	$	384	$	6	$	—	$	—	$	384	$	6

December 31, 2008
State and municipal securities	$	378	$	12	$	—	$	—	$	378	$	12
Mortgage-backed securities		160		1		—		—		160		1
Total	$	538	$	13	$	—	$	—	$	538	$	13

Available-for-Sale

June 30, 2009
State and municipal securities	$	5,287	$	78	$	3,027	$	222	$	8,314	$	300
Mortgage-backed securities		8,784		307		8,192		2,331		16,976		2,638
Corporate securities		—		—		492		7		492		7
Total	$	14,071	$	385	$	11,711	$	2,560	$	25,782	$	2,945

December 31, 2008
State and municipal securities	$	8,756	$	349	$	889	$	101	$	9,645	$	450
Mortgage-backed securities		10,522		3,006		4,302		489		14,824		3,495
Corporate securities		945		68		—		—		945		68
Total	$	20,223	$	3,423	$	5,191	$	590	$	25,414	$	4,013

As of June 30, 2009, the fair value of mortgage-backed securities (“MBS”) in the available-for-sale and held-to-maturity portfolios consists of $11,651 of agency MBS and $14,530 of non-agency MBS.

At June 30, 2009, there were 34 investment securities in an unrealized loss position, of which 15 were in a continuous loss position for 12 months or more. The unrealized losses on these securities were caused by changes in interest rates, widening credit spreads and market illiquidity, causing a decline in the fair value subsequent to their purchase. Management monitors published credit ratings on these securities for adverse changes. The Company has evaluated the securities shown above and anticipates full recovery of amortized cost with respect to these securities at maturity or sooner in the event of a more favorable market interest rate environment. Based on management’s evaluation and because the Company does not have the intent to sell these securities and it is not more likely than not that it will have to sell the securities before recovery of cost basis, the Company does not consider these investments to be other-than-temporarily impaired at June 30, 2009.

Gross gains realized on sales of securities were $303 and $0 and gross losses realized were $0 and $0 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

The Company did not engage in originating subprime mortgage loans, and it does not believe that it has exposure to subprime mortgage loans or subprime mortgage backed securities. Additionally, the Company does not have any investment in or exposure to collateralized debt obligations or structured investment vehicles.

Note 4 – Allowance for Credit Losses

	Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,						Twelve Months Ended Ended December 31,
	2009			2008			2009			2008			2008

Balance at beginning of period	$	8,040		$	5,120		$	7,623		$	5,007		$	5,007

Provision for credit losses		3,587			2,228			5,374			2,354			4,791

Charge-offs		(1,430	)		(708	)		(2,808	)		(727	)		(2,226	)
Recoveries		6			14			14			20			51
Net charge-offs		(1,424	)		(694	)		(2,794	)		(707	)		(2,175	)

Balance at end of period	$	10,203		$	6,654		$	10,203		$	6,654		$	7,623

Loans on which the accrual of interest has been discontinued were $17,171 and $14,676 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. Interest income foregone on non-accrual loans was $1,602 and $765 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company’s recorded investment in certain loans that were considered to be impaired was $30,775 and $22,117, respectively. At June 30, 2009, $110 of these impaired loans had a specific related valuation allowance of $2, while $30,773 did not require a specific valuation allowance. At December 31, 2008, $462 of these impaired loans had a specific valuation allowance of $118, while $21,655 did not require a specific valuation allowance. The balance of the allowance for loan losses in excess of these specific reserves is available to absorb the inherent losses from all other loans in the portfolio. The average investment in impaired loans was $29,882 and $16,915 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and the year ended December 31, 2008, respectively. The related amount of interest income recognized on a cash basis for loans that were impaired was $237 and $21 during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Loans past due 90 days or more and still accruing interest at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 were $1,778 and $2,274, respectively, and were made up almost entirely of loans that were fully guaranteed by the United States Department of Agriculture or Small Business Administration.

Note 5 – Stock Based Compensation

Effective January 1, 2006, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 123R, Share-Based Payment, which requires measurement of compensation cost for all stock-based awards based on the grant date fair value and recognition of compensation cost over the service period of stock-based awards. The Company has adopted SFAS No. 123R using the modified prospective method, which provides for no restatement of prior periods and no cumulative adjustment to equity accounts. It also provides for expense recognition for both new and existing unvested stock-based awards. Stock-based compensation expense during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $26 and $43 ($17 and $28 net of tax), respectively. Future compensation expense for unvested awards outstanding as of June 30, 2009 is estimated to be $75 recognized over a weighted average period of 1.5 years. There were no options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Cash received from the exercise of stock options during the six months ended June 30, 2008 totaled $58. The total intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2008 was $29.

The fair value of stock options granted is determined using the Black-Scholes option pricing model based on the following assumptions. Expected volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected term of stock options granted is based on the simplified method, which is the simple average between contractual term and vesting period. The risk-free rate is based on the expected term of stock options and the applicable U.S. Treasury yield in effect at the time of grant. There were no options granted during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively.

A summary of stock option activity under the stock option plans as of June 30, 2009 and 2008, and changes during the three months then ended are presented below:

	Shares			Weighted Average Exercise Price		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Term ( Years)		Aggregate Intrinsic Value
June 30, 2009

Outstanding beginning of period		684,527		$	12.58
Granted		—			—
Exercised		—			—
Forfeited		(24,805	)		14.05
Expired		—			—
Outstanding end of period		659,722		$	12.52		4.1		—

Exercisable end of period		572,382		$	12.37		3.5		—

June 30, 2008

Outstanding beginning of period		689,868		$	12.55
Granted		—			—
Exercised		(7,322	)		7.93
Forfeited		(1,650	)		14.85
Outstanding end of period		680,896		$	12.59		5.2		—

Exercisable end of period		549,337		$	12.29		4.4		—

A summary of the status of the Company’s nonvested options as of June 30, 2009 and 2008 and changes during the six months then ended are presented below:

	2009					2008
	Shares			Weighted Average Fair Value		Shares			Weighted Average Fair Value
Non-vested beginning of period		126,940		$	1.62		193,884		$	1.80
Granted		—			—		—			—
Vested		(20,735	)		2.01		(61,114	)		2.16
Forfeited		(18,865	)		1.51		(1,210	)		1.85
Non-vested end of period		87,340		$	1.55		131,560		$	1.63

Note 6 – Commitments and Contingencies

The Company is currently not party to any material pending litigation. However because of the nature of its activities, the Company is subject to various pending and threatened legal actions which may arise in the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of management, liabilities arising from these claims, if any, will not have a material effect on the results of operations or financial condition of the Company.

Note 7 – Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In March 2008, FASB issued SFAS No. 161, Disclosures about Derivative Instruments and Hedging Activities – an amendment of FASB Statement No. 133 (“SFAS No. 161”). SFAS No. 161 requires enhanced disclosures to provide a better understanding of how and why an entity uses derivative instruments, how derivative instruments and related hedge items are accounted for, and their effect on an entity’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows. SFAS No. 161 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2008. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In April, FASB issued the following FASB Staff Positions (“FSPs”) to provide additional guidance and enhance disclosures regarding fair value measurements and impairment of securities.

FSP FAS 107-1 and APB 28-1, Interim Disclosures about the Fair Value of Financial Instruments, amends SFAS No. 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments, to require an entity to provide disclosures about fair values of financial instruments in interim financial statements. This FSP is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted for periods ending after March 15, 2009. The Company adopted the FSP as of June 30, 2009. Adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

FSP FAS 115-2 and FAS 124-2, Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments, applies to investments in debt securities for which other-than-temporary impairments may be recorded. If any entity’s management asserts that it does not have the intent to sell a debt security and it is more likely than not that it will not have to sell the security before recovery of its cost basis, then an entity may separate other-than-temporary impairments into two components: 1) the amount related to credit losses recorded in earnings, and 2) all other amounts recorded in other comprehensive income. This FSP is effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted the FSP as of June 30, 2009. Adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

FSP 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly, provides additional guidance for estimating fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements. This FSP also provides guidance on identifying circumstances that indicate a transaction is not orderly. The provisions of FSP FAS 157-4 are effective for interim periods ending after June 15, 2009 with early adoption permitted. The Company adopted the FSP as of June 30, 2009. Adoption of this FSP did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In May 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 165, Subsequent Events, (“SFAS No. 165”) which establishes general standards of accounting for and disclosures of events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. It requires entities to disclose the date through which it has evaluated subsequent events and the basis for that date. SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009. SFAS No. 165 was effective for the Company as of June 30, 2009. Adoption of this standard did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, FASB issued SFAS No. 167, Amendments to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R). SFAS No. 167 eliminates FASB Interpretations 46(R) (“FIN 46(R)”) exceptions to consolidating qualifying special-purpose entities, contains new criteria for determining the primary beneficiary, and increases the frequency of required reassessments to determine whether a company is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. SFAS No. 167 also contains a new requirement that any term, transaction, or arrangement that does not have a substantive effect on an entity’s status as a variable interest entity, a company’s power over a variable interest entity, or a company’s obligation to absorb losses or its right to receive benefits of an entity must be disregarded in applying FIN 46(R) provisions. The elimination of the qualifying special-purpose entity concept and its consolidation exceptions means more entities will be subject to consolidation assessments and reassessments. This Statement requires additional disclosures regarding an entity’s involvement in a variable interest entity. This statement is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after November 15, 2009, and for interim periods therein. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of SFAS No. 167 on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168, The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles – a Replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (“SFAS No. 168”). SFAS No. 168 will require the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (“Codification”) to become the single source of authoritative U.S. accounting and reporting standards for nongovernmental entities in addition to the guidance issued by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). FASB Codification significantly changes the way financial statement preparers and auditors perform accounting research. The standard is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. The standard is effective for the Company during its interim period ending September 30, 2009 and does not expect SFAS No. 168 to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.

Note 8 – Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan

The Company has an unqualified supplemental executive retirement plan (SERP) that provides retirement benefits to its executive officers. The SERP is unsecured and unfunded and there are no plan assets. The following table sets forth the net periodic pension cost and obligation assumptions used in the measurement of the benefit obligation for the three and six months ended June 30:

	Three months ended June 30,				Six months ended June 30,
	2009		2008		2009			2008
Net periodic pension cost:
Service cost	$	30	$	23	$	114		$	46
Interest cost		18		12		61			24
Amortization of prior service cost and net (gains)/losses		20		18		(35	)		35

Net periodic pension cost	$	68	$	53	$	140		$	105

Note 9 – Fair Value Measurements

Effective January 1, 2008, the Company adopted SFAS 157, which established a hierarchy for measuring fair value that is intended to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. This hierarchy uses three levels of inputs to measure the fair value of assets and liabilities as follows:

Level 1 – Valuations based on quoted prices in active exchange markets for identical assets or liabilities; also includes certain U.S. Treasury securities, U.S. Government and agency securities, and corporate debt securities actively traded in over-the-counter markets.

Level 2 – Valuations of assets and liabilities traded in less active dealer or broker markets. Valuations include quoted prices for similar assets and liabilities traded in the same market; quoted prices for identical or similar instruments in markets that are not active; and model –derived valuations whose inputs are observable or whose significant value drivers are observable. Valuations may be obtained from, or corroborated by, third-party pricing services. This category generally includes certain U.S. Government and agency securities, corporate debt securities, and residential mortgage loans held for sale.

Level 3 – Valuation based on unobservable inputs supported by little or no market activity for financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, yield curves and similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. Level 3 valuations incorporate certain assumptions and projections in determining the fair value assigned to such assets or liabilities, but in all cases are corroborated by external data, which may include third-party pricing services.

The following table presents the balances of assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

	Readily Available Market Prices Level 1		Observable Market Prices Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3		Total

June 30, 2009
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Government securities	$	—	$	2,002	$	—	$	2,002
State and municipal securities		—		19,677		—		19,677
Mortgage-backed securities		—		25,601		—		25,601
Corporate securities		—		2,044		—		2,044
Total	$	—	$	49,324	$	—	$	49,324

December 31, 2008
Securities available-for-sale
U.S. Government securities	$	—	$	1,759	$	—	$	1,759
State and municipal securities		—		19,584		—		19,584
Mortgage-backed securities		—		27,205		—		27,205
Corporate securities		—		945		—		945
Total	$	—	$	49,493	$	—	$	49,493

The Company uses a third party pricing service to assist the Company in determining the fair value of the investment portfolio. The Company did not have any Level 3 inputs in the investment portfolio during the quarter.

Certain assets and liabilities are measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis after initial recognition such as loans measured for impairment and OREO. The following methods were used to estimate the fair value of each such class of financial instrument:

Impaired loans – A loan is considered impaired when, based on current information and events, it is probable that the Company will be unable to collect all amounts due (both interest and principle) according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Impaired loans are measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows or by the fair market value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

Other real estate owned – OREO is initially recorded at the lower of the carrying amount of the loan or fair value of the property less estimated costs to sell. This amount becomes the property’s new basis. Management considers third party appraisals in determining the fair value of particular properties. Any write-downs based on the property fair value less estimated costs to sell at the date of acquisition are charged to the allowance for credit losses. Management periodically reviews OREO in an effort to ensure the property is carried at the lower of its new basis or fair value, net of estimated costs to sell. Any additional write-downs based on re-evaluation of the property fair value are charged to non-interest expense.

The following table presents the Company’s financial assets that were accounted for at fair value on a nonrecurring basis at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008:

	Readily Available Market Prices Level 1		Observable Market Prices Level 2		Significant Unobservable Inputs Level 3		Total

June 30, 2009
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	5,063	$	5,063
OREO	$	—	$	—	$	12,111	$	12,111

December 31, 2008
Impaired loans	$	—	$	—	$	9,532	$	9,532
OREO	$	—	$	—	$	6,810	$	6,810

Other real estate owned with a carrying amount of $7,379 was acquired during the six months ended June 30, 2009. Upon foreclosure, these assets were written down $687 to their fair value, less estimated costs to sell, which was charged to the allowance for loan and lease losses during the period.

The following methods and assumptions were used by the Company in estimating the fair values of financial instruments disclosed in these consolidated financial statements:

Cash, Interest Bearing Deposits at Other Financial Institutions, and Federal Funds Sold

The carrying amounts of cash, interest bearing deposits at other financial institutions, and federal funds sold approximate their fair value.

Securities Available for Sale and Held to Maturity

Fair values for securities are based on quoted market prices.

Loans

The fair value of loans is estimated based on comparable market statistics for loans with similar credit ratings. An additional liquidity discount is also incorporated to more closely align the fair value with observed market prices. Fair values of loans held for sale are based on their estimated market prices.

Deposit Liabilities

The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity date is included at the amount payable on demand. Fair values for fixed rate certificates of deposit are estimated using a discounted cash flow calculation based on interest rates currently offered on similar certificates.

Secured borrowings

For variable rate secured borrowings that reprice frequently and have no significant change in credit risk, fair values are based on carrying values.

Short-Term Borrowings

The fair values of the Company’s short-term borrowings are estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Long-Term Borrowings

The fair values of the Company’s long-term borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flow analysis based on the Company’s incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements.

Junior Subordinated Debentures

The fair value of the junior subordinated debentures and trust preferred securities approximates the pricing of a preferred security at current market prices.

Off-Balance-Sheet Instruments

The fair value of commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit was estimated using the rates currently charged to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms of the agreements and the present creditworthiness of the customers. Since the majority of the Company’s off-balance-sheet instruments consist of non-fee producing, variable-rate commitments, the Company has determined they do not have a material fair value.

The estimated fair value of the Company’s financial instruments at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 are as follows:

	2009				2008
	Carrying		Fair		Carrying		Fair
	Amount		Value		Amount		Value
Financial Assets
Cash and due from banks, interest-bearing deposits in banks, and federal funds sold	$	57,079	$	57,079	$	17,539	$	17,539
Securities available for sale		49,324		49,324		49,493		49,493
Securities held to maturity		7,623		7,714		6,386		6,418
Loans held for sale		14,837		14,899		11,486		11,752
Loans, net		471,107		375,917		478,695		440,597

Financial Liabilities
Deposits	$	566,344	$	568,566	$	511,307	$	512,926
Short-term borrowings		7,500		7,636		23,500		23,779
Long-term borrowings		24,000		24,554		22,500		23,033
Secured borrowings		1,001		1,001		1,354		1,354
Junior subordinated debentures		13,403		6,732		13,403		7,113

Note 10 – Common Stock Offering

The Company is attempting to raise up to a total of $12 million in capital through a private offer and sale of up to 2,666,667 shares of common stock, together with warrants to purchase a number of shares equal to 25% of the shares acquired. Warrants issued in the transaction have a five-year term, an exercise price of $6.50 per share, and are exercisable in whole or in part at any time upon written notice of exercise. On June 30, 2009, the Company completed the private sale of 1,112,515 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase a total of 278,128 additional shares, for total proceeds of $5,006. Subsequent to June 30, 2009, the Company completed the private sale of an additional 824,951 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 206,237 additional shares, for total proceeds of $3,712. To date, the Company has issued 1,937,466 shares of common stock and warrants to purchase 484,365 additional shares, for total proceeds of $8,719.

Note 11 – Goodwill

At June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, the Company had $11,282 in goodwill. In accordance with SFAS No. 142, Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets, goodwill is not amortized but is reviewed for potential impairment at the reporting unit level on an annual basis and between annual tests in certain circumstances such as material adverse changes in legal, business, regulatory, and economic factors.

During the second quarter of 2009, the Company performed its annual goodwill impairment test to determine whether an impairment of its goodwill asset exists. The Company has one reporting unit, the Bank, for purposes of computing goodwill. The goodwill impairment test involves a two-step process. The first step is a comparison of the reporting unit’s fair value to its carrying value. If the reporting unit’s fair value is less than its carrying value, the Company would be required to progress to the second step. In the second step the Company would calculate the implied fair value of its reporting unit, and compare the implied fair value of goodwill to the carrying amount. If the carrying amount of the goodwill is greater than the implied fair value of that goodwill, an impairment loss would be recognized in an amount equal to that excess.

The fair value of the reporting unit was determined in the first step using a combination of market and income approaches that were similarly weighted. The results of the Company’s step one test indicated that the reporting unit’s fair value exceeded its carrying value and no goodwill impairment existed. No assurance can be given that the Company’s goodwill will not be impaired in future periods.

ITEM 2 – MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF

FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

A Warning About Forward-Looking Information

This document contains forward-looking statements that are subject to risks and uncertainties. These statements are based on the present beliefs and assumptions of our management, and on information currently available to them. Forward-looking statements include the information concerning our possible future results of operations set forth under "Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations" and statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words "believes," "expects," "anticipates," "intends," "plans," "estimates" or similar expressions.

Any forward-looking statements in this document are subject to risks described in our Annual Report on form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 (the “2008 10-K”), as well as risks relating to, among other things, the following:

1. competitive pressures among depository and other financial institutions that may impede our ability to attract and retain borrowers, depositors and other customers, retain key employees, and maintain or increase our interest margins and fee income;

2. changing laws, regulations, standards, and government programs that may significantly increase our costs, including compliance and insurance costs, decrease our access to liquidity, place additional burdens on our limited management resources, or further change the competitive balance among financial institutions;

3. deteriorating economic or business conditions nationally and in the regions in which we do business that are expected to result in, among other things, a deterioration in credit quality and/or reduced demand for credit, increases in nonperforming assets, elevated levels of net charge-offs, and increased workout, OREO and regulatory expenses;

4. decreases in real estate and other asset prices, whether or not due to economic conditions, that may reduce the value of the assets that serve as collateral for many of our loans;

5. changes in the interest rate environment that may reduce our margins, decrease our customers' capacity to repay loans, or decrease the value of our securities; and

6. a lack of liquidity in the market for our common stock that may make it difficult or impossible to sell our stock or lead to distortions in the market price of our stock.

Our management believes the forward-looking statements in this report are reasonable; however, you should not place undue reliance on them. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of performance. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Many of the factors that will determine our future results and share value are beyond our ability to control or predict. We undertake no obligation to update forward-looking statements.

Overview

The Company is a bank holding company headquartered in Aberdeen, Washington. The Company's wholly-owned subsidiary, The Bank of the Pacific (the “Bank”), is a state chartered bank, also located in Washington. The Company also has two wholly-owned subsidiary trusts known as PFC Statutory Trust I and II (the “Trusts”) that were formed December 2005 and May 2006, respectively, in connection with the issuance of pooled trust preferred securities. The Company was incorporated in the state of Washington on February 12, 1997, pursuant to a holding company reorganization of the Bank.

The Company conducts its banking business through the Bank, which operates 16 branches located in communities in Grays Harbor, Pacific, Whatcom, Skagit and Wahkiakum counties in the state of Washington and one in Clatsop County, Oregon. On April 17, 2009 the Bank consolidated its Birch Bay, Washington branch into the Ferndale, Washington branch to reduce its branches in operation to 16. Additionally, construction of a new branch planned for Warrenton, Oregon, has been postponed as part of the Bank’s efforts to prudently manage capital.

The Bank provides loan and deposit services to customers who are predominantly small and middle-market businesses and middle-income individuals.

Critical Accounting Policies

Critical accounting policies are discussed in the 2008 10-K under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation – Critical Accounting Policies.” There have been no material changes in our critical accounting policies from the 2008 10-K.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Please see Note 7 of the Company's Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements above for a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements and the likely effect on the Company.

Financial Summary

The following are significant trends reflected in the Company’s results of operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and financial condition as of that date:

Total assets were $669,026,000 at June 30, 2009, an increase of $43,191,000, or 6.90%, over year-end 2008. Growth in interest bearing deposits in banks and federal funds sold were the primary contributors to overall asset growth.

The Company remains well capitalized with a total risk based capital ratio of 12.19% at June 30, 2009, compared to 11.79% at December 31, 2008. During the second quarter, the Company raised capital by issuing common shares and warrants in connection with the initial closings of its private offering, with proceeds to the Company of $5,006,000, further strengthening its capital ratios. See Footnote 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements for further information.

Non-performing assets increased $6,174,000, or 26.0%, to $29,934,000 at June 30, 2009. The increase is primarily attributable to non-performing construction and land development loans, which represented $24,044,000, or 80.3%, of non-performing assets.

The Company continues to be successful in reducing overall exposure to construction, land acquisition and other land loans, which declined $9.1 million during the six months ended June 30, 2009. This segment of the portfolio totaling $91.6 million at June 30, 2009, accounts for approximately 18.5% of the loan portfolio.

Total deposits increased $55,037,000, or 10.8%, for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to December 31, 2008, which reflects management’s continued focus on a strong deposit base and conditions in our market area.

As a result of deposit growth, lower borrowings and increased borrowing capacity with the Federal Reserve, the Company’s liquidity ratio of approximately 33% at June 30, 2009 translates into over $220 million in available funding for general operations and to meet loan and deposit needs.

Return on average assets and return on average equity were (0.40%) and (5.16%), respectively, for the six months ended June 30, 2009 due to increases in the provision for credit losses and foreclosed real estate (“OREO”) write-downs, which is reflective of the deterioration in credit quality.

Results of Operations

Net income. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, net income (loss) was $(2,265,000) and $(2,579,000), respectively, compared to $(673,000) and $375,000 for the same periods in 2008. The decrease in net income for the three and six month period was primarily due to increased provisions for credit losses necessary to absorb current period losses, OREO write-downs resulting from updated appraisals, and continued net interest margin compression, which was partially offset by an increase in non-interest income and a reduction in core net overhead (non-interest expense excluding OREO write-downs minus non-interest income divided by average assets).

Management initiated a number of measures to control expenses during recent quarters, including a reduction in workforce, consolidation of two unprofitable branches, and tightening of other non-interest expenses. As a result, core net overhead for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased to 2.35% compared to 2.85% for the same period in 2008.

Net interest income. Net interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $352,000 and $329,000, or 6.40% and 3.01%, respectively, compared to the same periods in 2008. See the table below and the accompanying discussion for further information on interest income and expense. The net interest margin (net interest income divided by average earning assets) decreased to 3.58% for the six months ended June 30, 2009 from 4.26% for the same period last year. The decline in net interest margin is due in part to a decrease in the average yield earned on loans from 6.98% for the six months ended June 30, 2008 to 5.97% for the current six month period that was only partially offset by a decrease in the Company’s average cost of funds to 2.23% at June 30, 2009 from 2.92% one year ago. In addition, increasing levels of nonperforming loans and the reversal of interest income on loans placed on non-accrual status have also negatively affected our net interest margin.

The Federal Reserve Board (the “FRB”) heavily influences market interest rates, including deposit and loan rates offered by many financial institutions. As a bank holding company, we derive the greatest portion of our income from net interest income. The Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”) of the FRB cut the target federal funds rate 175 basis points between June 2008 and June 2009. Approximately 78% of the Company’s loan portfolio is tied to short-term rates, and therefore, re-price immediately when interest rate changes occur. The Company’s funding sources also re-price when rates change, however, there is a meaningful lag in the timing of the re-pricing of deposits as compared to loans. As a result of these and other factors, the Company continues to experience net interest margin compression.

The following table sets forth information with regard to average balances of interest earning assets and interest bearing liabilities and the resultant yields or cost, net interest income, and the net interest margin on a tax equivalent basis. Loans held for sale and non-accrual loans are included in total loans.

Six Months Ended June 30,

				2009									2008
				Interest									Interest
(dollars in thousands)	Average			Income			Avg			Average			Income			Avg
	Balance			(Expense)			Rate			Balance			(Expense)			Rate
Interest Earning Assets
Loans (1)	$	506,015		$	15,095	*		5.97	%	$	461,672		$	16,121	*		6.98	%
Taxable securities		33,400			962			5.76			31,126			790			5.08
Tax-exempt securities		24,397			774	*		6.35			18,278			557	*		6.09
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock		3,087			—			—			1,956			11			1.12
Interest earning balances with banks		25,665			28			0.22			1,074			14			2.61

Total interest earning assets	$	592,564		$	16,859			5.69	%	$	514,106		$	17,493			6.81	%

Cash and due from banks		10,285									11,545
Bank premises and equipment (net)		16,590									16,101
Other real estate owned		7,524									—
Other assets		30,942									33,930
Allowance for credit losses		(8,224	)								(5,108	)

Total assets	$	649,681								$	540,574

Interest Bearing Liabilities
Savings and interest bearing demand	$	202,572		$	(912	)		0.90	%	$	202,979		$	(1,558	)		1.54	%
Time deposits		265,779			(3,929	)		2.96			174,389			(3,650	)		4.19
Total deposits		468,351			(4,841	)		2.07			377,368			(5,208	)		2.76

Short-term borrowings		6,365			(26	)		0.82			17,316			(239	)		2.76
Long-term borrowings		36,497			(668	)		3.66			20,533			(397	)		3.87
Secured borrowings		1,338			(42	)		6.28			1,403			(49	)		6.99
Junior subordinated debentures		13,403			(283	)		4.22			13,403			(376	)		5.61
Total borrowings		57,603			(1,019	)		3.54			52,655			(1,061	)		4.03

Total interest-bearing liabilities	$	525,954		$	(5,860	)		2.23	%	$	430,023		$	(6,269	)		2.92	%

Demand deposits		71,782									82,964
Other liabilities		1,928									5,433
Shareholders’ equity		50,017									52,154

Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity	$	649,681								$	570,574

Net interest income				$	10,999	*							$	11,224	*
Net interest spread								3.71	%								4.37	%
Net interest margin								3.58	%								4.26	%
Tax equivalent adjustment				$	381	*							$	277	*

* Tax equivalent basis – 34% tax rate used

(1) Interest income on loans includes loan fees of $445 and $580 in 2009 and 2008, respectively.

Interest and dividend income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $85,000 and $738,000, or 1.03% and 4.29%, respectively, compared to the same period in 2008. The decrease was primarily due to the decline in yield earned on our loan portfolio as a direct result of cuts in the federal funds rate during 2008. Additionally, loans placed on non-accrual increased to $17,171,000 at June 30, 2009, placing further strain on interest income. Loans averaged $506.0 million with an average yield of 5.97% for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to average loans of $461.7 million with an average yield of 6.98% for the same period in 2008. The decline in loan yield was partially offset by an increase in yield on investments. Interest and dividend income on investment securities for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $304,000, or 26.01%, compared to the same period in 2008, despite a declining rate environment. The average yield on taxable securities increased to 5.76% at June 30, 2009, from 5.08% at June 30, 2008. The increase is due primarily to the purchase of certain AAA rated securities in the second half of 2008. Most of these purchases were made at discounts during a period of significant market illiquidity, and they have, to date, proven to be good investments.

Interest expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 increased $267,000, or 9.61%, compared to the same period in 2008. The increase is primarily attributable to an increase in interest-bearing deposit balances, which was partially offset by an interest rate reduction on $8.2 million in variable rate junior subordinated debentures. Interest expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 decreased $409,000, or 6.52%, compared to the same period in 2008, which is mainly due to rate decreases on interest-bearing balances. Average interest-bearing deposit balances for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 were $468.4 million and $377.4 million, respectively, with an average cost of 2.07% and 2.76%, respectively. Deposit rates in the Company’s local market areas have been slow to decrease as competition has resulted in the pressure to keep deposit rates elevated, despite the drop in interest rates by the FOMC. This has been further exacerbated by a number of financial institutions in our market areas that have been issued regulatory enforcement actions precluding the use or renewal of brokered deposits, and therefore paying higher than expected market rates for retail deposits.

Average borrowings for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $57.6 million with an average cost of 3.54% compared to $52.7 million with an average cost of 4.03% for the same period in 2008. The decrease in borrowing rates is primarily attributable to rate decreases in short-term borrowings and junior subordinated debentures, which were partially offset by the funding of the Company’s loan growth in late 2008 with Federal Home Loan Bank Advances, which are more expensive as compared to funding such growth with lower cost demand, money market or savings deposits. Average long-term borrowings for the six months ended June 30, 2009 were $36.5 million compared to $20.5 million one year ago.

Provision and allowance for credit losses. The allowance for credit losses reflects management's current estimate of the amount required to absorb probable losses on loans in its loan portfolio based on factors present as of the end of the period. Loans deemed uncollectible are charged against and reduce the allowance. Periodically, a provision for credit losses is charged to current expense. This provision acts to replenish the allowance for credit losses in order to maintain the allowance at a level that management deems adequate.

Periodic provisions for credit losses are made to maintain the allowance for credit losses at an appropriate level. The provisions are based on an analysis of various factors including historical loss experience based on volumes and types of loans, volumes and trends in delinquencies and non-accrual loans, trends in portfolio volume, results of internal and independent external credit reviews, and anticipated economic conditions. For additional information, please see the discussion under the heading "Critical Accounting Policy" in Item 7 of our 2008 10-K.

During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, provision for credit losses totaled $3,587,000 and $5,374,000, compared to $2,228,000 and $2,354,000 for the same periods in 2008. The significant increase in provision for credit losses in the current year is the result of increases in loan loss rates compared to June 30, 2008 and the increase in substandard loans primarily within our land acquisition and development and residential construction loan portfolios. Credit quality continues to be problematic due to the prolonged downturn in the economy and unfavorable conditions in the residential real estate market. However, the Company believes that non-performing assets are near their peak and beginning to show signs of improvement. Loans past due 30 days or more at June 30, 2009 totaled $21,015,000. This represents 4.24% of total loans (including loans held for sale), compared to $23,096,000, or 4.64%, at December 31, 2008. Borrowers on loans secured by speculative housing and land lots are beginning to report sales of units. During the second quarter, the borrower of the Company’s largest condo loan successfully sold 23 condos out of 38 at an auction, thereby reducing principal on a $7.7 million loan by over $4.2 million. Additionally, some recent appraisals of collateral dependent loans have supported the book value of the loans without further deterioration.

For the six months ended June 30, 2009, net charge-offs were $2,794,000 compared to net charge-offs of $707,000 for the same period in 2008. Net charge-offs for the twelve months ended December 31, 2008 were $2,175,000. Net charge-offs continue to be centered in the residential construction and land development portfolios, which accounted for approximately $1,543,000 of total net charge-offs for the year. The ratio of net charge-offs to average loans outstanding for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was 0.55% and 0.15%, respectively.

At June 30, 2009, the allowance for credit losses was $10,203,000 compared to $7,623,000 at December 31, 2008, and $6,654,000 at June 30, 2008. The increase from June 30, 2008 is attributable to additional provision for credit losses arising out of increases in loan loss rates and adversely classified loans, and is reflective of the depressed and deteriorating economic conditions in our markets. The ratio of the allowance for credit losses to total loans outstanding (including loans held for sale) was 2.06%, 1.53% and 1.41%, at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The Company’s loan portfolio includes a significant portion of government guaranteed loans which are fully guaranteed by the United States Government. Government guaranteed loans were $43,495,000, $49,934,000, and $53,499,000 at June 30, 2009, December 31, 2008 and June 30, 2008, respectively. The ratio of allowance for credit losses to total loans outstanding excluding the government guaranteed loans was 2.25%, 1.70%, and 1.59%, respectively.

There is no precise method of predicting specific credit losses or amounts that ultimately may be charged off. The determination that a loan may become uncollectible, in whole or in part, is a matter of judgment. Similarly, the adequacy of the allowance for credit losses is a matter of judgment that requires consideration of many factors, including (a) economic conditions and the effect on particular industries and specific borrowers; (b) a review of borrowers' financial data, together with industry data, the competitive situation, the borrowers' management capabilities and other factors; (c) a continuing evaluation of the loan portfolio, including monitoring by lending officers and staff credit personnel of all loans which are identified as being of less than acceptable quality; (d) an in-depth analysis, on a monthly basis, of all loans judged to present a possibility of loss (if, as a result of such monthly analysis, the loan is judged to be not fully collectible, the carrying value of the loan is reduced to that portion considered collectible); and (e) an evaluation of the underlying collateral for secured lending, including the use of independent appraisals of real estate properties securing loans. An analysis of the adequacy of the allowance is conducted by management quarterly and is reviewed by the board of directors. Based on this analysis and applicable accounting standards, management considers the allowance for credit losses to be adequate at June 30, 2009.

Non-performing assets and foreclosed real estate owned. Non-performing assets totaled $29,934,000 at June 30, 2009. This represents 4.47% of total assets, compared to $23,760,000, or 3.80%, at December 31, 2008, and $8,765,000, or 1.50%, at June 30, 2008. Residential construction and land development loans continue to be the primary component of non-performing assets, representing $24,044,000, or 80.3%, of non-performing assets. Of this amount, $14,035,000 is comprised of 6 relationships as follows: 3 condominium projects totaling $7,688,000 and 3 residential lot subdivisions totaling $6,347,000. Loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing interest of $1,778,000 and $2,274,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively, were made up almost entirely of loans that were fully guaranteed by the United Stated Department of Agriculture or Small Business Administration.

The increase in non-performing assets reflects the continued weakness in the housing industry. The Company continues to aggressively monitor and identify non-performing assets and take appropriate action based upon updated market information. Given the trend of rapidly declining residential real estate values, the Company reevaluated several non-performing loans and all foreclosed real estate assets during the six months ended June 30, 2009. As a result, the Company recorded charge-offs of $2,447,000 and write-downs of foreclosed real estate of $2,517,000 during the period based on the most recent appraisals. The Company will continue to reevaluate non-performing assets over the coming twelve months as market conditions change.

Foreclosed real estate at June 30, 2009 totaled $10,985,000 and is made up as follows: seven land or land development properties totaling $2,573,000, three speculative residential real estate properties totaling $1,370,000, two condo complexes totaling $6,266,000 and one partially completed commercial warehouse valued at $776,000. The balances are recorded at the estimated net realizable value less selling costs.

SUMMARY OF NON-PERFORMING ASSETS

(in thousands)	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008		June 30, 2008

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more	$	1,778	$	2,274	$	—
Non-accrual loans		17,171		14,676		8,485
Foreclosed real estate		10,985		6,810		280

TOTAL	$	29,934	$	23,760	$	8,765

Non-interest income and expense. Non-interest income for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $962,000 and $2,027,000, or 74.5% and 81.0%, compared to the same periods in 2008. Gain on sales of loans, the largest component of non-interest income, totaled $2,577,000 and $893,000 for the six months ended June 30 2009 and 2008, respectively. The increase for the six month period is due to increased mortgage refinancing activity as the result of historically low mortgage rates. Origination of loans held for sale more than tripled to a total of $162,089,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2009, compared to $50,735,000 for the same period in 2008. Management expects gain on sale of loans to remain strong for 2009 due to refinance and new mortgage activity driven by historically low interest rates and increased purchase money transactions.

Services charges on deposits for the six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $47,000, or 6.06%, compared to the same period in 2008. The Company continues to emphasize exceptional customer service and believes this emphasis, together with a long standing strong core deposit base and continued deposit growth, contributed to the increase in service charge revenue.

The Bank recorded gains on sale of agency mortgage-backed securities of $303,000 during the six months ended June 30, 2009.

Total non-interest expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 increased $2,625,000 and $4,090,000 compared to the same periods in 2008. The increase was largely due to write-downs on foreclosed real estate totaling $1,734,000 and $2,517,000 for the current three and six month periods. Additionally, non-interest expense was adversely impacted by the accrual of $305,000 during the second quarter for the Company’s share of the special assessment imposed by the FDIC on all insured depository institutions, as well as increases in assessment rates effective April 1, 2009. FDIC assessment expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 totaled $443,000 and $623,000, respectively, compared to $39,000 and $57,000 for the same periods in the prior year.

Salaries and employee benefits for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009, increased $220,000 and $538,000, or 6.73% and 8.39%, respectively, compared to the same period in 2008, due primarily to increases in commissions paid on the sale of loans held for sale which was partially offset by a reduction in workforce. Effective January 2009, the Bank completed a reduction in force of 13 full-time equivalent positions, which led to $93,000 in severance expense during the first quarter. In addition, in the weeks leading up to the strategic staffing reduction, other positions were not filled when vacated. Cost savings from total staff reductions are expected to be $1.2 million on an annualized basis. Full time equivalent employees at June 30, 2009 were 216 compared to 221 at December 31, 2008. Excluding commissioned real estate employees, full time equivalent employees have declined by 24 on a year over year basis. During the second quarter, the Company completed the closure of the Birch Bay branch by consolidating it into the nearby Ferndale, Washington branch. This combined with an ongoing effort to reduce non-interest expenses, has reduced net overhead (excluding OREO write-downs) from 2.85% at December 31, 2008 to 2.35% at June 30, 2009.

The increase in other operating expenses for the six months ended June 30, 2009 was primarily due to increases in legal fees, data processing expenses, and OREO operating costs, which were up $53,000, $383,000 and $232,000, respectively, over the same period in the prior year

Income taxes. The federal income tax provision (benefit) for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was $(2,048,000) and $(266,000), and $(2,400,000) and $58,000, respectively. The effective tax rate for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was (47.5)% and (48.2)%, respectively. The effective tax rate differs from the statutory federal tax rate of 35% largely due to tax exempt interest income earned on certain investment securities and loans, income earned from the increase in cash surrender value of bank owned life insurance and tax credits from investments in low-income housing projects.

Financial Condition

Assets. Total assets were $669,026,000 at June 30, 2009, an increase of $43,191,000, or 6.90%, over year-end 2008. Loans, including loans held for sale, were $496,147,000 at June 30, 2009, a decrease of $1,657,000, or 0.33%, over year-end 2008. Growth in interest bearing deposits in banks and federal funds sold were the primary contributors to overall asset growth.

Investments. The investment portfolio provides the Company with an income alternative to loans. The Company’s investment portfolio at June 30, 2009 was $56,947,000 compared to $55,879,000 at the end of 2008, an increase of $1,068,000, or 1.91%. During the quarter ended March 31, 2009, the Company sold $6.4 million in mortgage-backed securities for a gain of $303,000 to help offset OREO write-downs. These securities were replaced with purchases of similar securities during the second quarter of 2009.

Loans. Interest and fees earned on our loan portfolio is our primary source of revenue. Loans represented 74% of total assets as of June 30, 2009, compared to 81% at December 31, 2008. The majority of the Company’s loan portfolio is comprised of commercial and industrial loans and real estate loans. The commercial and industrial loans are a diverse group of loans to small, medium, and large businesses for purposes ranging from working capital needs to term financing of equipment.

Construction and land development loans and commercial real estate loans have been significant in our loan portfolio, representing 18.5% and 37.6%, respectively, of our loan portfolio at June 30, 2009. Conditions in the construction and land development arena in our market areas have slowed considerably, and we have seen increasing delinquencies and foreclosures in this portion of our portfolio, which have contributed to the increased provision for credit losses. Our commercial real estate portfolio generally consists of a wide cross-section of retail, small office, warehouse, and industrial type properties. Loan to value ratios for the Company’s commercial real estate loans at origination generally do not exceed 75% and debt service ratios are generally 125% or better. While we have significant balances within this lending category, we believe that our lending policies and underwriting standards are sufficient to minimize risk even in a moderate downturn in the commercial real estate market. Additionally, this is a sector in which we have significant long-term management experience.

Beginning in late 2006 and continuing into 2007, the Company strengthened its underwriting criteria for advance rates on raw land loans, land development loans, residential lots, speculative construction for condominiums and all construction loans as the housing market softened. Additionally, during 2008, the Company put in place further restrictions on loans secured by all types of real estate properties, including home equity lines of credit and land and land development loans, and tightened underwriting policies on hospitality projects. In 2009, the Bank implemented further restrictions on non-owner occupied commercial real estate loans in order to reduce our concentration in this sector. The Bank is not engaging in new land acquisition and development financing. Limited residential speculative construction is provided for a very select and small group of borrowers, which is designed to augment exit from the related credits.

Loan detail by category, including loans held for sale, as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008

Commercial and industrial	$	88,671		$	91,888
Construction, land development and other land loans		91,590			100,725
Real estate residential		122,333			108,420
Real estate commercial		185,380			188,444
Installment		7,223			7,293
Credit cards and overdrafts		1,848			1,959
Less unearned income		(898	)		(925	)
Total Loans		496,147			497,804
Allowance for credit losses		(10,203	)		(7,623	)
Net Loans	$	485,944		$	490,181

Deposits. Total deposits were $566,344,000 at June 30, 2009, an increase of $55,037,000 or 10.8%, compared to December 31, 2008. Deposit detail by category as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 follows (in thousands):

	June 30, 2009		December 31, 2008

Non-interest bearing demand	$	80,175	$	80,066
Interest bearing demand		78,538		68,113
Money market deposits		80,523		93,216
Savings deposits		43,446		51,948
Time deposits		283,662		217,964

Total deposits	$	566,344	$	511,307

Interest bearing demand deposits increased $10,425,000, or 15.3%, due to the continued success of a high-yield retail checking account which was introduced in 2008 to attract new deposits. The Dream Checking account pays a high rate of interest upon meeting certain electronic requirements such as debit card and automated clearing house transactions. At June 30, 2009, the balances in Dream Checking accounts totaled $20.9 million. Money market accounts decreased $12,693,000, or 13.6%, primarily due to decreased balances from escrow and title companies which have significantly reduced balances due to the slowing real estate market. Time deposits increased $65,698,000, or 30.1%, due to a combination of increases in retail deposits of $34,186,000 and increases in brokered deposits of $31,512,000. The increase in retail deposits is mostly attributable to increased brand awareness in the Whatcom County market, and our commitment to maintain a disciplined deposit strategy, focusing on enhancing long-term customer relationships. Brokered deposits totaled $66,817,000 and $35,305,000 at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively. The increase in brokered deposits was primarily to replace maturing public deposits totaling $21,839,000 that have become less attractive due to regulatory pledging requirements and to further strengthen on-balance sheet liquidity to take advantage of business opportunities within our markets. Changes in the market or new regulatory restrictions could limit our ability to acquire brokered deposits in the future.

It is our strategic goal to grow deposits through increased brand awareness, continued success from new branches opened in recent years, and by paying competitive rates in our local markets. Competitive pressures from banks in our market areas with strained liquidity positions or public regulatory enforcement actions may slow our deposit growth. In addition, the slowing economy and public fears from recent bank failures could also impact our ability to grow deposits. In the long-term we anticipate continued growth in our core deposits through both the addition of new customers and our current client base. We have established and expanded a branch system to serve our consumer and business depositors. In addition, management’s strategy for funding asset growth is to make use of brokered and other wholesale deposits on an as-needed basis.

Liquidity. We believe adequate liquidity continues to be available to accommodate fluctuations in deposit levels, fund operations, provide for customer credit needs, and meet obligations and commitments on a timely basis. The Bank’s primary sources of funds are customer deposits, maturities of investment securities, loan sales, loan repayments, net income, and other borrowings. When necessary, liquidity can be increased by taking advances from credit available to the Bank. The Bank believes it has a strong liquidity position at June 30, 2009, with $57.1 million in cash and federal funds sold and other sources of liquidity currently totaling $164 million. The Bank maintains credit facilities with correspondent banks totaling $20,000,000, of which none was used at June 30, 2009. In addition, the Bank has a credit line with the Federal Home Loan Bank of Seattle for up to 20% of assets, of which $31,500,000 was used at June 30, 2009. For its funds, the Company relies on dividends from the Bank and, historically, proceeds from the issuance of trust preferred securities, both of which are used for various corporate purposes, including dividends.

At June 30, 2009, two wholly-owned subsidiary grantor trusts established by the Company had issued and outstanding $13,403,000 of trust preferred securities. During the second quarter of 2009, the Company elected to exercise the right to defer interest payments on trust preferred debentures. Under the terms of the indenture, the Company has the right to defer interest payments for up to twenty consecutive quarterly periods without going in to default. During the period of deferral, the principal balance and unpaid interest will continue to bear interest as set forth in the indenture. In addition, the Company will not be permitted to pay any dividends or distributions on, or redeem or make a liquidation payment with respect to, any of the Company’s common stock during the deferral period.

For additional information regarding trust preferred securities, see the 2008 10-K under the heading “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations – Liquidity”. The Company does not expect the issuance of new trust preferred securities to be a source of liquidity in 2009.

Capital. Total shareholders' equity was $53,223,000 at June 30, 2009, an increase of $3,149,000, or 6.3%, compared to December 31, 2008. For more information, see Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report. The Federal Reserve and the Federal Deposit Insurance Commission (“FDIC”) have established minimum guidelines that mandate risk-based capital requirements for bank holding companies and member banks. Under the guidelines, risk percentages are assigned to various categories of assets and off-balance sheet items to calculate a risk-adjusted capital ratio. Regulatory minimum risk-based capital guidelines under the Federal Reserve require Tier 1 capital to risk-weighted assets of 4% and total capital to risk-weighted assets of 8% to be considered adequately capitalized. To qualify as well capitalized under the FDIC, banks must have a Tier 1 leverage ratio of 5%, a Tier 1 risk-based ratio of 6%, and a Total risk-based capital ratio of 10%. Failure to qualify as well capitalized can negatively impact a bank’s ability to expand and to engage in certain activities.

The Company and the Bank qualify as well capitalized at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 as demonstrated in the table below.

	Company						Bank						Requirements
	6/30/09			12/31/08			6/30/09			12/31/08			Adequately Capitalized			Well Capitalized

Tier 1 leverage ratio		8.54	%		8.87	%		8.52	%		8.75	%		4	%		5	%
Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio		10.93	%		10.54	%		10.90	%		10.40	%		4	%		6	%
Total risk-based capital ratio		12.19	%		11.79	%		12.16	%		11.65	%		8	%		10	%

The Company and the Bank are subject to certain restrictions on the payment of dividends without prior regulatory approval.

ITEM 3. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Interest rate, credit, and operations risks are the most significant market risks that affect the Company's performance. The Company relies on loan review, prudent loan underwriting standards, and an adequate allowance for possible credit losses to mitigate credit risk.

An asset/liability management simulation model is used to measure interest rate risk. The model produces regulatory oriented measurements of interest rate risk exposure. The model quantifies interest rate risk by simulating forecasted net interest income over a 12-month time period under various interest rate scenarios, as well as monitoring the change in the present value of equity under the same rate scenarios. The present value of equity is defined as the difference between the market value of assets less current liabilities. By measuring the change in the present value of equity under various rate scenarios, management is able to identify interest rate risk that may not be evident from changes in forecasted net interest income.

The Company is currently asset sensitive, meaning that interest earning assets mature or re-price more quickly than interest-bearing liabilities in a given period. Therefore, a significant increase in market rates of interest could improve net interest income. Conversely, a decreasing rate environment may adversely affect net interest income.

It should be noted that the simulation model does not take into account future management actions that could be undertaken should actual market rates change during the year. Also, the simulation model results are not exact measures of the Company's actual interest rate risk. They are only indicators of rate risk exposure based on assumptions produced in a simplified modeling environment designed to heighten sensitivity to changes in interest rates. The rate risk exposure results of the simulation model typically are greater than the Company's actual rate risk. That is due to the conservative modeling environment, which generally depicts a worst-case situation. Management has assessed the results of the simulation reports as of June 30, 2009 and believes that there has been no material change since December 31, 2008.

ITEM 4. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

The Company's disclosure controls and procedures are designed to ensure that information the Company must disclose in its reports filed or submitted under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 ("Exchange Act") is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported on a timely basis. Our management has evaluated, with the participation and under the supervision of our chief executive officer (“CEO”) and chief financial officer (“CFO”), the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based on this evaluation, our CEO and CFO have concluded that, as of such date, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in ensuring that information relating to the Company, including its consolidated subsidiaries, required to be disclosed in reports that it files under the Exchange Act is (1) recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC's rules and forms, and (2) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our CEO and CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures.

No change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting occurred during our last fiscal quarter that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II – OTHER INFORMATION

ITEM 1. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Not applicable.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

There has been no material change from the risk factors previously reported in the 2008 10-K.

ITEM 2. UNREGISTERED SALES OF EQUITY SECURITIES AND USE OF PROCEEDS

In January 2008, the Company’s board of directors approved a share repurchase program authorizing the purchase of up to 150,000 shares of its common stock. There were no purchases of common stock by the Company during the quarter ended June 30, 2009. We have no current intention to purchase stock under our share repurchase program during 2009.

See Note 10 to the condensed consolidated financial statements included under Item I of this report.

ITEM 3. DEFAULTS UPON SENIOR SECURITIES

None.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

Previously reported.

ITEM 5. OTHER INFORMATION

None.

ITEM 6. EXHIBITS

See Exhibit Index immediately following signatures below.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

	PACIFIC FINANCIAL CORPORATION

DATED: August 10, 2009		By:	/s/ Dennis A. Long
			Dennis A. Long
			Chief Executive Officer

		By:	/s/ Denise Portmann
			Denise Portmann
			Chief Financial Officer

EXHIBIT INDEX

EXHIBIT NO.		EXHIBIT

31.1		Certification of CEO under Rule 13a – 14(a) of the Exchange Act.
31.2		Certification of CFO under Rule 13a – 14(a) of the Exchange Act.
32		Certification of CEO and CFO under 18 U.S.C. Section 1350.