PACIFICORP /OR/ - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
[X]
Quarterly Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act
of 1934
For
the
quarterly period ended March 31, 2007
or
[
] Transition Report Pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange
Act of 1934
For
the
transition period from ______ to _______
Commission
|
Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter
|
IRS
Employer
|
||
File
Number
|
State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization
|
Identification No.
|
||
1-5152
|
PacifiCorp
|
93-0246090
|
||
(An
Oregon Corporation)
|
||||
825
N.E. Multnomah Street,
|
||||
Portland,
Oregon 97232
|
||||
503-813-5000
|
||||
N/A
|
||||
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days.
Yes
T
No
མ
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See the definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer མ
|
Accelerated
filer མ
|
Non-accelerated
filer T
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
མ
No
T
As
of
April 30, 2007, all 357,060,915 outstanding shares of PacifiCorp’s common
stock were indirectly owned by MidAmerican Energy Holdings
Company.
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
PART
I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION
3
|
||
15
|
||
24
|
||
24
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
26
|
||
27
|
2
Item 1. | Financial Statements |
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To
the
Board of Directors and Shareholders of PacifiCorp:
We
have
reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of PacifiCorp and its
subsidiaries (“PacifiCorp”) as of March 31, 2007, and the related
consolidated statements of income and cash flows for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2007. These interim financial statements are the
responsibility of PacifiCorp’s management.
We
conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). A review of interim financial
information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making
inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is
substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States),
the
objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial
statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an
opinion.
Based
on
our review, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made
to such consolidated interim financial statements as of March 31, 2007, and
for the three-month period then ended for them to be in conformity with
accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We
have
previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet
of
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries as of December 31, 2006, and the related
consolidated statements of income, common shareholder’s equity and comprehensive
income, and of cash flows for the nine-month period then ended (not presented
herein); and in our report dated February 27, 2007, we expressed an
unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements, which included
an explanatory paragraph related to the adoption of SFAS No. 158, Employers’
Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement
Plans.
In our
opinion, the information set forth in the accompanying consolidated balance
sheet as of December 31, 2006 is fairly presented, in all material
respects, in relation to the consolidated balance sheet from which it has been
derived.
The
accompanying consolidated financial information for the three-month period
ended
March 31, 2006, was not audited or reviewed by us and, accordingly, we do
not express an opinion or any form of assurance on it.
/s/
Deloitte & Touche LLP
Portland,
Oregon
May 4,
2007
3
PACIFICORP
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in millions)
Three-Month
Periods
|
|||||||
Ended March 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
1,027
|
$
|
1,230
|
|||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
Energy
costs
|
415
|
548
|
|||||
Operations
and maintenance
|
262
|
274
|
|||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
121
|
113
|
|||||
Taxes,
other than income taxes
|
28
|
24
|
|||||
Total
|
826
|
959
|
|||||
Income
from operations
|
201
|
271
|
|||||
Interest
expense and other (income) expense:
|
|||||||
Interest
expense
|
75
|
69
|
|||||
Interest
income
|
(3
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
|||
Allowance
for borrowed funds
|
(7
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
|||
Allowance
for equity funds
|
(7
|
)
|
(6
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
-
|
(2
|
)
|
||||
Total
|
58
|
54
|
|||||
Income
before income tax expense
|
143
|
217
|
|||||
Income
tax expense
|
44
|
70
|
|||||
Net
income
|
99
|
147
|
|||||
Preferred
dividend requirement
|
(1
|
)
|
(1
|
)
|
|||
Earnings
on common stock
|
$
|
98
|
$
|
146
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
4
PACIFICORP
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in millions)
As
of
|
|||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
ASSETS
|
|||||||
Current
assets:
|
|||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$
|
449
|
$
|
59
|
|||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
316
|
342
|
|||||
Unbilled
revenue
|
153
|
178
|
|||||
Amounts
due from affiliates - MEHC
|
11
|
53
|
|||||
Inventories
at average costs:
|
|||||||
Materials
and supplies
|
150
|
140
|
|||||
Fuel
|
111
|
104
|
|||||
Derivative
contract asset
|
123
|
151
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
61
|
28
|
|||||
Other
|
55
|
57
|
|||||
Total
current assets
|
1,429
|
1,112
|
|||||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
16,008
|
15,843
|
|||||
Accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
(5,932
|
)
|
(5,842
|
)
|
|||
10,076
|
10,001
|
||||||
Construction
work-in-progress
|
1,000
|
809
|
|||||
Total
property, plant and equipment, net
|
11,076
|
10,810
|
|||||
Other
assets:
|
|||||||
Regulatory
assets
|
1,412
|
1,397
|
|||||
Derivative
contract asset
|
208
|
235
|
|||||
Deferred
charges and other
|
295
|
298
|
|||||
Total
other assets
|
1,915
|
1,930
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
14,420
|
$
|
13,852
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
5
PACIFICORP
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS (Unaudited) (continued)
(Amounts
in millions)
As
of
|
|||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
LIABILITIES
AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
|
|||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
|||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$
|
382
|
$
|
385
|
|||
Amounts
due to affiliates - MEHC
|
38
|
1
|
|||||
Accrued
employee expenses
|
117
|
85
|
|||||
Taxes
payable, other than income taxes
|
46
|
30
|
|||||
Interest
payable
|
63
|
57
|
|||||
Derivative
contract liability
|
110
|
110
|
|||||
Long-term
debt and capital lease obligations, currently maturing
|
121
|
127
|
|||||
Preferred
stock subject to mandatory redemption, currently maturing
|
38
|
38
|
|||||
Short-term
debt
|
216
|
397
|
|||||
Other
|
132
|
135
|
|||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,263
|
1,365
|
|||||
Deferred
credits:
|
|||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,625
|
1,641
|
|||||
Investment
tax credits
|
60
|
62
|
|||||
Regulatory
liabilities
|
815
|
822
|
|||||
Derivative
contract liability
|
494
|
504
|
|||||
Pension
and other post employment liabilities
|
666
|
691
|
|||||
Other
|
394
|
374
|
|||||
Total
deferred credits
|
4,054
|
4,094
|
|||||
Long-term
debt and capital lease obligations, net of current
maturities
|
4,567
|
3,967
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
9,884
|
9,426
|
|||||
Commitments
and contingencies (See Note 6)
|
|||||||
Shareholders’
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock
|
41
|
41
|
|||||
Common
equity:
|
|||||||
Common
shareholder’s capital - 750 shares authorized, no par
value,
357 shares issued and outstanding
|
3,602
|
3,600
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
901
|
789
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss, net
|
(8
|
)
|
(4
|
)
|
|||
Total
common equity
|
4,495
|
4,385
|
|||||
Total
shareholders’ equity
|
4,536
|
4,426
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
14,420
|
$
|
13,852
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
6
PACIFICORP
AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Unaudited)
(Amounts
in millions)
Three-Month
Periods
|
|||||||
Ended
March 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
99
|
$
|
147
|
|||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|||||||
Unrealized
gain on derivative contracts, net
|
(3
|
)
|
(53
|
)
|
|||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
121
|
113
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes and investment tax credits, net
|
(12
|
)
|
8
|
||||
Regulatory
asset/liability establishment and amortization
|
2
|
6
|
|||||
Other
|
8
|
6
|
|||||
Changes
in:
|
|||||||
Accounts
receivable, net and other assets
|
49
|
32
|
|||||
Inventories
|
(17
|
)
|
(23
|
)
|
|||
Amounts
due to/from affiliates - MEHC, net
|
79
|
-
|
|||||
Amounts
due to/from affiliates - ScottishPower, net
|
-
|
(1
|
)
|
||||
Accounts
payable and other liabilities
|
12
|
86
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
338
|
321
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Capital
expenditures
|
(376
|
)
|
(333
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of assets
|
6
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from available-for-sale securities
|
14
|
32
|
|||||
Purchases
of available-for-sale securities
|
(12
|
)
|
(20
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
8
|
(15
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(360
|
)
|
(336
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Changes
in short-term debt
|
(181
|
)
|
(30
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from long-term debt, net of issuance costs
|
600
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from equity contributions
|
-
|
110
|
|||||
Dividends
paid
|
(1
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
|||
Repayments
and redemptions on long-term debt and capital lease
obligations
|
(6
|
)
|
(100
|
)
|
|||
Other
|
-
|
8
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
412
|
(29
|
)
|
||||
Change
in cash and cash equivalents
|
390
|
(44
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
59
|
164
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
449
|
$
|
120
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial
statements.
7
PACIFICORP
AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(1) General
PacifiCorp
(which includes PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries) is a United States electric
utility company serving retail customers in portions of the states of Utah,
Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, Idaho and California. PacifiCorp generates
electricity and also engages in electricity sales and purchases on a wholesale
basis. The subsidiaries of PacifiCorp support its electric utility operations
by
providing coal mining facilities and services, steam delivery services and
environmental remediation. PacifiCorp is an indirect subsidiary of MidAmerican
Energy Holdings Company (“MEHC”), which is a consolidated subsidiary of
Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (“Berkshire Hathaway”).
The
accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements have been prepared
in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States
of
America (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and the U.S. Securities and
Exchange Commission’s (the “SEC”) rules and regulations for Form 10-Q and
Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not include all of the
disclosures required by GAAP for annual financial statements. Management
believes the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements include all adjustments
(consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for
fair
presentation of the financial statements as of March 31, 2007 and for the
three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006. A portion of
PacifiCorp’s business is of a seasonal nature and, therefore, results of
operations for the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006 are
not necessarily indicative of the results for a full year.
The
accompanying unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements include the accounts
of
PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries in which it holds a controlling financial
interest. Intercompany accounts and transactions have been
eliminated.
The
preparation of the unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements in conformity
with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
the
reported amounts of assets and liabilities at the date of the financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period.
Actual results may differ from the estimates used in preparing the unaudited
Consolidated Financial Statements. Management’s Discussion and Analysis and Note
2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in PacifiCorp’s
Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month period ended December 31,
2006, describe the most significant accounting estimates and policies used
in
the preparation of the Consolidated Financial Statements. There have been no
significant changes in PacifiCorp’s assumptions regarding critical accounting
estimates and significant accounting policies during the first three months
of
2007, except as described in Note 2.
(2) New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
February 2007, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 159, “The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities - Including an Amendment
to SFAS No. 115” (“SFAS
No. 159”). SFAS No. 159 permits entities to elect to measure many financial
instruments and certain other items at fair value. Upon adoption of SFAS No.
159, an entity may elect the fair value option for eligible items that exist
at
the adoption date. Subsequent to the initial adoption, the election of the
fair
value option should only be made at initial recognition of the asset or
liability or upon a remeasurement event that gives rise to new-basis accounting.
The decision about whether to elect the fair value option is applied on an
instrument-by-instrument basis, is irrevocable and is applied only to an entire
instrument and not only to specified risks, cash flows or portions of that
instrument. SFAS No. 159 does not affect any existing accounting standards
that
require certain assets and liabilities to be carried at fair value nor does
it
eliminate disclosure requirements included in other accounting standards. SFAS
No. 159 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15,
2007. PacifiCorp is currently evaluating the impact of adopting SFAS No. 159
on
its consolidated financial position and results of operations.
8
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value
Measurements” (“SFAS
No. 157”).
SFAS
No. 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair
value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS No. 157 does
not impose fair value measurements on items not already accounted for at fair
value; rather, it applies, with certain exceptions, to other accounting
pronouncements that either require or permit fair value measurements. SFAS
No.
157 is effective for fiscal years beginning after November 15, 2007 and
interim periods within those fiscal years. PacifiCorp is currently evaluating
the impact of adopting SFAS No. 157 on its consolidated financial position
and
results of operations.
In
July
2006, the FASB issued FASB Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes-an interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN
48”).
PacifiCorp adopted the provisions of FIN 48 effective January 1, 2007. Under
FIN
48, tax benefits are recognized only for tax positions that are more likely
than
not to be sustained upon examination by tax authorities. The amount recognized
is measured as the largest amount of benefit that is greater than 50% likely
to
be realized upon ultimate settlement. Unrecognized tax benefits are tax benefits
claimed in PacifiCorp’s tax returns that do not meet these recognition and
measurements standards.
As
of
January 1, 2007, PacifiCorp had an asset of $22 million for uncertain
tax positions. PacifiCorp recognized a net increase in the asset of
$22 million as a cumulative effect of adopting FIN 48, which was offset by
increases in beginning retained earnings of $13 million and deferred income
tax liabilities of $9 million in the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The
$22 million is included in other deferred credits in the Consolidated
Balance Sheet.
Included
in the asset of $22 million are $14 million of net uncertain tax
positions that, if recognized, would have an impact on the effective tax rate.
The remaining amounts relate to tax positions for which ultimate deductibility
is highly certain but for which there is uncertainty as to the timing of such
deductibility. Recognition of these tax positions, other than applicable
interest and penalties, would not affect PacifiCorp’s effective tax rate.
PacifiCorp recognizes interest and penalties accrued related to uncertain tax
positions in income tax expense. As of January 1, 2007, PacifiCorp had
$7 million accrued for the receipt of interest, which is included in the
asset for uncertain tax positions.
Prior
to
2006, PacifiCorp filed income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction
and
various state jurisdictions. The U.S. Internal Revenue Service has closed
examination of PacifiCorp’s income tax returns through its tax year ended March
31, 2000. In addition, open tax years related to a number of state jurisdictions
remain subject to examination. As a result of the sale of PacifiCorp to MEHC
on
March 21, 2006, Berkshire Hathaway commenced including PacifiCorp in its
U.S. Federal income tax returns. During the three-month period ended
March 31, 2007, there were no material changes to the asset for uncertain
tax positions.
(3) Recent
Debt Transaction
On
March 14, 2007, PacifiCorp issued $600 million of its 5.75% First
Mortgage Bonds due April 1, 2037. The proceeds are being used to repay
short-term debt and for other general corporate purposes.
(4) Risk
Management and Hedging Activities
PacifiCorp
is directly exposed to the impact of market fluctuations in the prices of
natural gas and electricity. PacifiCorp is exposed to interest rate risk as
a
result of the issuance of fixed and variable rate debt. PacifiCorp employs
established policies and procedures to manage its risks associated with these
market fluctuations using various commodity and financial derivative
instruments, including forward contracts, swaps and options. The risk management
process established by PacifiCorp is designed to identify, measure, assess,
report and manage each of the various types of risk involved in its business.
PacifiCorp’s portfolio of energy derivatives is substantially used for
non-trading purposes. As of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
PacifiCorp had no financial derivatives in effect relating to interest rate
exposure.
9
The
following table summarizes the various derivative mark-to-market positions
included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of March 31,
2007 (in millions):
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||
Regulatory
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||
Derivative
Net Asset (Liability)
|
Net
Asset
|
Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||
Assets
|
Liabilities
|
Total
|
(Liability)
|
Income
(Loss) (1)
|
||||||||||||
Commodity
derivatives
|
$
|
330
|
$
|
(604
|
)
|
$
|
(274
|
)
|
$
|
271
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
Foreign
currency contracts
|
1
|
-
|
1
|
(1
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
331
|
$
|
(604
|
)
|
$
|
(273
|
)
|
$
|
270
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|||
Current
|
$
|
123
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
$
|
13
|
|||||||||
Non-current
|
208
|
(494
|
)
|
(286
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
331
|
$
|
(604
|
)
|
$
|
(273
|
)
|
(1)
|
Before
income taxes.
|
The
following table summarizes the various derivative mark-to-market positions
included in the accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets as of December 31,
2006 (in millions):
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||
Regulatory
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||
Derivative
Net Asset (Liability)
|
Net
Asset
|
Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||
Assets
|
Liabilities
|
Total
|
(Liability)
|
Income
(Loss) (1)
|
||||||||||||
Commodity
derivatives
|
$
|
383
|
$
|
(614
|
)
|
$
|
(231
|
)
|
$
|
233
|
$
|
3
|
||||
Foreign
currency contracts
|
3
|
-
|
3
|
(3
|
)
|
-
|
||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
386
|
$
|
(614
|
)
|
$
|
(228
|
)
|
$
|
230
|
$
|
3
|
||||
Current
|
$
|
151
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
$
|
41
|
|||||||||
Non-current
|
235
|
(504
|
)
|
(269
|
)
|
|||||||||||
Total
|
$
|
386
|
$
|
(614
|
)
|
$
|
(228
|
)
|
(1)
|
Before
income taxes.
|
The
following table summarizes the amount of the pre-tax unrealized gains and losses
included within the Consolidated Statements of Income associated with changes
in
the fair value of PacifiCorp’s derivative contracts that are not included in
rates (in millions):
Three-Month
Periods
|
|||||||
Ended
March 31,
|
|||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Revenues
|
$
|
6
|
$
|
278
|
|||
Operating
expenses:
|
|||||||
Energy
costs
|
(3
|
)
|
(223
|
)
|
|||
Operations
and maintenance
|
-
|
(2
|
)
|
||||
Total
unrealized gain on derivative contracts
|
$
|
3
|
$
|
53
|
10
(5) Common
Shareholder’s Equity
During
the three-month period ended March 31, 2006, PacifiCorp issued
9,902,728 shares of its common stock to PacifiCorp Holdings, Inc. (“PHI”),
its former parent company, at a total price of $110 million.
(6) Commitments
and Contingencies
Environmental
Matters
PacifiCorp
is subject to numerous federal, state and local environmental laws and
regulations, including the Clean Air Act, related air quality standards
promulgated by the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) and various state air
quality laws; the Endangered Species Act; the Comprehensive Environmental
Response, Compensation and Liability Act, relating to environmental cleanups;
the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act and similar state laws relating
to
the storage and handling of hazardous materials; and the Clean Water Act, and
similar state laws relating to water quality. These laws have the potential
to
impact PacifiCorp’s current and future operations; the cost of complying with
applicable environmental laws, regulations and rules is expected to be material
to PacifiCorp’s domestic generation facilities. Current and future Clean Air Act
and associated requirements will impact the operations of PacifiCorp’s
generating facilities and will require PacifiCorp to reduce sulfur dioxide,
nitrogen oxides and mercury emissions from current levels through the
installation of additional or improved emission controls, the purchase of
additional emission allowances, or some combination thereof. Additionally,
the
adoption of stringent limits on greenhouse emissions could significantly impact
PacifiCorp’s fossil-fueled facilities, and, therefore, its financial results. As
of March 31, 2007, PacifiCorp’s environmental contingencies consist
principally of air quality matters. PacifiCorp believes it is in material
compliance with current environmental requirements.
Accrued
Environmental Costs
PacifiCorp
is fully or partly responsible for environmental remediation that results from
other than normal operations at various contaminated sites, including sites
that
are or were part of PacifiCorp’s operations and sites owned by third parties.
PacifiCorp accrues environmental remediation expenses when the expense is
believed to be probable and can be reasonably estimated. The quantification
of
environmental exposures is based on many factors, including changing laws and
regulations, advancements in environmental technologies, the quality of
available site-specific information, site investigation results, expected
remediation or settlement timelines, PacifiCorp’s proportionate responsibility,
contractual indemnities and coverage provided by insurance policies. The
liability recorded as of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006 was
$36 million and $40 million, respectively, and is included in other
liabilities and other deferred credits on the accompanying Consolidated Balance
Sheets. Environmental remediation liabilities that result from the normal
operation of long-lived assets and that are associated with the retirement
of
those assets are accounted for as asset retirement obligations.
Hydroelectric
Relicensing
PacifiCorp’s
hydroelectric portfolio consists of 50 plants with an aggregate plant net owned
capacity of 1,160 megawatts (“MW”). The Federal Energy Regulatory
Commission (the “FERC”) regulates 97.9% of the net capacity of this portfolio
through 18 individual licenses. Several of PacifiCorp’s hydroelectric projects
are in some stage of relicensing with the FERC. Hydroelectric relicensing and
the related environmental compliance requirements are subject to uncertainties.
PacifiCorp expects that future costs relating to these matters may be
significant and will consist primarily of additional relicensing costs,
operations and maintenance expense, and capital expenditures. Electricity
generation reductions may result from the additional environmental requirements.
PacifiCorp had incurred $81 million in costs at March 31, 2007 and
$79 million in costs at December 31, 2006, for ongoing hydroelectric
relicensing, which are reflected in construction work-in-progress on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets.
11
In
February 2004, PacifiCorp filed with the FERC a final application for a new
license to operate the 169-MW nameplate-rated Klamath hydroelectric project
in
anticipation of the March 2006 expiration of the existing license. PacifiCorp
is
currently operating under an annual license issued by the FERC and expects
to
continue to operate under annual licenses until the new operating license is
issued. As part of the relicensing process, the United States Departments of
Interior and Commerce filed proposed licensing terms and conditions with the
FERC in March 2006, which proposed that PacifiCorp construct upstream and
downstream fish passage facilities at the Klamath hydroelectric project’s four
mainstem dams. In April 2006, PacifiCorp filed alternatives to the federal
agencies’ proposal and requested an administrative hearing to challenge some of
the federal agencies’ factual assumptions supporting their proposal for the
construction of the fish passage facilities. A hearing was held in August 2006
before an administrative law judge. The administrative law judge issued a ruling
in September 2006 generally supporting the federal agencies’ factual
assumptions. In January 2007, the United States Departments of Interior and
Commerce filed modified terms and conditions consistent with March 2006 filings
and rejected the alternatives proposed by PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp is prepared
to
meet and implement the federal agencies’ terms and conditions as part of the
project’s relicensing. However, PacifiCorp expects to continue in settlement
discussions with various parties in the Klamath Basin area who have intervened
with the FERC licensing proceeding to try to achieve a mutually acceptable
outcome for the project.
Also,
as
part of the relicensing process, the FERC is required to perform an
environmental review. In September 2006, the FERC issued its draft environmental
impact statement on the Klamath hydroelectric project license. The public
comment period on the draft environmental impact statement closed on
December 1, 2006. The FERC is expected to issue its final environmental
impact statement in spring 2007, after which other federal agencies will
complete their endangered species analyses. The states of Oregon and California
will need to issue water quality certifications prior to the FERC issuing a
final license.
In
the
relicensing of the Klamath project, PacifiCorp had incurred $43 million and
$42 million in costs at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively, which are reflected in construction work-in-progress in the
accompanying Consolidated Balance Sheets. While the costs of implementing new
license provisions cannot be determined until such time as a new license is
issued, such costs could be material.
Legal
Matters
PacifiCorp
is party to a variety of legal actions arising out of the normal course of
business. Plaintiffs occasionally seek punitive or exemplary damages. PacifiCorp
does not believe that such normal and routine litigation will have a material
effect on its consolidated financial results. PacifiCorp is also involved in
other kinds of legal actions, some of which assert or may assert claims or
seek
to impose fines and penalties in substantial amounts.
In
February 2007, the Sierra Club and the Wyoming Outdoor Council filed a complaint
against PacifiCorp in the federal district court in Cheyenne, Wyoming, alleging
violations of air quality opacity standards at PacifiCorp’s Jim Bridger
Power Plant in Wyoming. Opacity is an indication of the amount of light that
is
obscured in the flue of a generating facility. The complaint alleges thousands
of violations of asserted six-minute compliance periods and seeks an injunction
ordering the Jim Bridger plant’s compliance with opacity limits, civil penalties
of $32,500 per violation, and the plaintiffs’ costs of litigation. PacifiCorp
believes it has a number of defenses to the claims. PacifiCorp intends to
vigorously oppose the lawsuit but cannot predict its outcome at this time.
PacifiCorp has already committed to invest at least $812 million in
pollution control equipment at its generating facilities, including the Jim
Bridger plant. This commitment is expected to significantly reduce system-wide
emissions, including emissions at the Jim Bridger plant.
12
FERC
Issues
California
Refund Case
On
April 11, 2007, PacifiCorp executed a settlement and release of claims
agreement (“Settlement”) with Pacific Gas and Electric Company, Southern
California Edison Company, San Diego Gas & Electric Company, the People of
the State of California, ex rel. Edmund G. Brown Jr., Attorney General, the
California Electricity Oversight Board, and the California Public Utilities
Commission (collectively, the “California Parties”), certain of which purchased
energy in the California Independent System Operator (“ISO”) and the California
Power Exchange (“PX”) markets during past periods of high energy prices in 2000
and 2001. The Settlement, filed with FERC on April 11, 2007, settles claims
brought by the California Parties against PacifiCorp for refunds and remedies
in
numerous related proceedings (together, the “FERC Proceedings”), as well as
certain potential civil claims, arising from events and transactions in Western
United States energy markets during the period January 1, 2000, through
June 20, 2001 (the “Refund Period”). Under the Settlement, PacifiCorp made
a cash payment to escrows controlled by the California Parties in the amount
of
$16 million on April 30, 2007, and upon FERC approval of the agreement,
PacifiCorp will allow the PX to release an additional $12 million to such
escrows, which represents PacifiCorp’s estimated unpaid receivables from
transactions in the PX and ISO markets during the Refund Period, plus interest.
The monies held in the escrows will, upon FERC acceptance of the settlement,
be
distributed to buyers of power from the ISO and PX markets during the Refund
Period. Other buyers in the ISO and PX markets will be provided the option
of
joining in the Settlement, in which case they will receive payments from one
of
the escrows. The agreement provides for the release of claims by the California
Parties (as well as additional parties that join in the Settlement) against
PacifiCorp for refunds, disgorgement of profits, or other monetary or
non-monetary remedies in the FERC Proceedings, and provides a mutual release
of
claims for civil damages and equitable relief. As PacifiCorp previously accrued
for these items, the settlement did not materially impact PacifiCorp’s financial
results.
(7) Employee
Benefit Plans
In
December 2006, non-bargaining employees were notified that PacifiCorp is
switching from a traditional final average pay formula for the PacifiCorp
Retirement Plan to a cash balance formula effective June 1, 2007. Benefits
under the final average pay formula will be frozen as of May 31, 2007, with
no further benefit accrual under that formula. All future benefits will be
earned under the cash balance formula.
The
components of net periodic benefit cost for the pension and other postretirement
benefit plans for the three-month periods ended March 31 were as follows
(in millions):
Other
|
|||||||||||||
Pension
|
Postretirement
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||||||
Service
cost
|
$
|
8
|
$
|
8
|
$
|
2
|
$
|
2
|
|||||
Interest
cost
|
19
|
19
|
8
|
8
|
|||||||||
Expected
return on plan assets
|
(17
|
)
|
(19
|
)
|
(6
|
)
|
(7
|
)
|
|||||
Amortization
and other costs
|
8
|
9
|
5
|
5
|
|||||||||
Net
periodic benefit cost
|
$
|
18
|
$
|
17
|
$
|
9
|
$
|
8
|
Excluded
from table above were $3 million and $2 million of contributions to
the joint pension and other postretirement plans for the three-month periods
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively.
Employer
Contributions
Employer
contributions to the pension plans and the other postretirement plan are
expected to be approximately $88 million and $34 million,
respectively, in 2007. As of March 31, 2007, $32 million and
$9 million, respectively, of contributions had been made to the pension
plans and the other postretirement plan.
13
Severance
PacifiCorp
has undertaken a review of its organization and workforce. As a result of the
review, PacifiCorp incurred severance expense of $6 million during the
three-month period ended March 31, 2007, compared to $12 million
during the three-month period ended March 31, 2006.
(8) Comprehensive
Income and Components
of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
The
components of comprehensive income for the three-month periods ended March
31
are as follows (in millions):
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Net
income
|
$
|
99
|
$
|
147
|
|||
Fair
value adjustment on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $(3) and
$-
|
(4
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Minimum
pension liability, net of tax of $- and $3
|
-
|
5
|
|||||
Unrealized
losses on marketable securities, net of tax of $- and $-
|
-
|
(1
|
)
|
||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
|
95
|
$
|
151
|
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss is included in shareholders’ equity in the Consolidated
Balance Sheets and consists of the following components, net of tax (in
millions):
As
of
|
|||||||
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Unrecognized
amounts on retirement benefits, net of tax of $(4) and
$(4)
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
|
Fair
value adjustment on cash flow hedges, net of tax of $(1) and
$1
|
(2
|
)
|
2
|
||||
Total
accumulated other comprehensive loss, net
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
14
The following is management’s discussion and analysis of certain significant factors which have affected the financial condition and results of operations of PacifiCorp and its subsidiaries (collectively, “PacifiCorp”) during the periods included herein. Explanations include management’s best estimate of the impact of weather, customer growth and other factors. This discussion should be read in conjunction with PacifiCorp’s historical unaudited Consolidated Financial Statements and the notes thereto included elsewhere in Item 1. PacifiCorp’s actual results in the future could differ significantly from the historical results.
Forward-Looking
Statements
This
report contains statements that do not directly or exclusively relate to
historical facts. These statements are “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking
statements are typically identified by the use of forward-looking words, such
as
“may,” “could,” “project,” “believe,” “anticipate,” “expect,” “estimate,”
“continue,” “potential,” “plan,” “forecast,” “intend,” and similar terms. These
statements are based on PacifiCorp’s current intentions, assumptions,
expectations and beliefs and are subject to risks, uncertainties and other
important factors. Many of these factors are outside PacifiCorp’s control and
could cause actual results to differ materially from those expressed or implied
by PacifiCorp’s forward-looking statements. These factors include, among others:
· |
The
outcome of general rate cases and other proceedings conducted by
regulatory commissions or other governmental and legal
bodies;
|
· |
Changes
in prices and availability for both purchases and sales of wholesale
electricity and purchases of coal, natural gas and other fuel sources
that
could have a significant impact on generation capacity and energy
costs;
|
· |
Changes
in regulatory requirements or other legislation, including limits
on the
ability of public utilities to recover income tax expense in rates
such as
Oregon Senate Bill 408;
|
· |
Changes
in economic, industry or weather conditions, as well as demographic
trends, that could affect customer growth and electricity usage or
supply;
|
· |
A
high degree of variance between actual and forecasted load and prices
that
could impact the hedging strategy and costs to balance electricity
load
and supply;
|
· |
Hydroelectric
conditions, as well as the cost, feasibility and eventual outcome
of
hydroelectric relicensing proceedings, that could have a significant
impact on electric capacity and cost and on PacifiCorp’s ability to
generate electricity;
|
· |
Performance
of PacifiCorp’s generation facilities, including unscheduled outages or
repairs;
|
· |
Changes
in, and compliance with, environmental and endangered species laws,
regulations, decisions and policies that could increase operating
and
capital improvement costs, reduce plant output and/or delay plant
construction;
|
· |
The
impact of new accounting pronouncements or changes in current accounting
estimates and assumptions on financial position and results of
operations;
|
· |
The
impact of increases in healthcare costs, changes in interest rates
and
investment performance on pension and other post-retirement benefits
expense, as well as the impact of changes in legislation on funding
requirements;
|
· |
Availability,
terms and deployment of capital;
|
· |
Financial
condition and creditworthiness of significant customers and
suppliers;
|
· |
The
impact of financial derivatives used to mitigate or manage interest
rate
risk and volume and price risk and changes in the commodity prices,
interest rates and other conditions that affect the value of the
derivatives;
|
15
· |
Changes
in PacifiCorp’s credit ratings;
|
· |
Timely
and appropriate completion of PacifiCorp’s resource procurement process;
unanticipated construction delays, changes in costs, receipt of required
permits and authorizations, ability to fund capital projects and
other
factors that could affect future generation plants and infrastructure
additions;
|
· |
Other
risks or unforeseen events, including wars, the effects of terrorism,
embargos and other catastrophic events;
and
|
· |
Other
business or investment considerations that may be disclosed from
time to
time in the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) filings or
in other publicly disseminated written
documents.
|
Further
details of the potential risks and uncertainties affecting PacifiCorp are
described in PacifiCorp’s filings with the SEC. PacifiCorp undertakes no
obligation to publicly update or revise any forward-looking statements, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. The foregoing review
of factors should not be construed as exclusive.
Company
Overview
PacifiCorp
is a regulated electric utility company serving approximately 1.7 million
retail customers in service territories aggregating approximately 136,000 square
miles in portions of the states of Utah, Oregon, Wyoming, Washington, Idaho
and
California. The regulatory commission in each state approves rates for retail
electric sales within that state. PacifiCorp also sells electricity on the
wholesale market to public and private utilities, energy marketing companies
and
incorporated municipalities. Wholesale activities are regulated by the FERC.
PacifiCorp owns, or has interests in, 69 thermal, hydroelectric and wind
generating plants with a net plant owned capacity of 8,588-MW. The six
state regulatory commissions and the FERC also have authority over the
construction and operation of PacifiCorp’s electric generation facilities.
PacifiCorp transmits electricity through approximately 15,600 miles of
transmission lines. PacifiCorp is an indirect subsidiary of MidAmerican Energy
Holdings Company (“MEHC”). MEHC, a global energy company based in Des Moines,
Iowa, is a consolidated subsidiary of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (“Berkshire
Hathaway”).
Results
of Operations
Overview
PacifiCorp’s
net income was $99 million for the three-month period ended March 31,
2007 compared to $147 million for the three-month period ended
March 31, 2006. The $48 million decrease in net income was primarily
due to lower net unrealized gains on derivative contracts, increased fuel costs
due to higher volumes and prices and higher depreciation expense. These
decreases to net income were partially offset by higher retail prices approved
by regulators and lower income tax expense in the current period. Net unrealized
gains on derivative contracts were $3 million during the three-month period
ended March 31, 2007, compared to $53 million during the three-month
period ended March 31, 2006. The decrease in net unrealized gains on
derivative contracts was primarily due to the change in estimate during the
three-month period ended September 30, 2006 for contracts considered probable
of
receiving recovery in rates due to regulatory settlements in Utah and Oregon,
which resulted in more activity being recorded as a net regulatory asset in
the
current period.
Output
from PacifiCorp’s thermal plants for the three-month period ended March 31,
2007, increased by 485,145 megawatt-hours (“MWh”), or 4%, compared to the
three-month period ended March 31, 2006. This increase was primarily due to
the Currant Creek plant becoming fully operational at the end of March 2006.
Output from PacifiCorp’s hydroelectric facilities decreased by 374,534 MWh,
or 23%, during the three-month period ended March 31, 2007, compared to the
three-month period ended March 31, 2006. This decrease was primarily due to
drier than normal conditions in the current period.
16
Three-Month
Period Ended March 31, 2007 Compared to Three-Month Period Ended
March 31, 2006
Revenues
(in millions)
Three-Month
Periods
|
|||||||||||||
Ended March 31,
|
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||
Retail
|
$
|
777
|
$
|
714
|
$
|
63
|
9
|
%
|
|||||
Wholesale
sales and other
|
250
|
516
|
(266
|
)
|
(52
|
)
|
|||||||
Total
revenues
|
$
|
1,027
|
$
|
1,230
|
$
|
(203
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
||||
Retail
energy sales (gigawatt - hours)
|
13,076
|
12,766
|
310
|
2
|
|||||||||
Wholesale
energy sales (gigawatt - hours)
|
3,496
|
3,480
|
16
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
retail customers (in thousands)
|
1,674
|
1,640
|
34
|
2
|
Retail
revenues
increased $63 million, or 9%, primarily due to:
· |
$42 million
of increases from higher retail prices approved by
regulators;
|
· |
$12 million
of increases relating to growth in the number of
customers;
|
· |
$6 million
of increases due to higher average customer usage, primarily as a
result
of colder weather as compared to the prior period;
and
|
· |
$3 million
of increases due to changes in customer usage at different tariff
levels.
|
Wholesale
sales and other revenues
decreased $266 million, or 52%, primarily due to:
· |
$272 million
of decreases due to changes in the fair value of derivative contracts;
|
· |
$15 million
of decreases on wholesale electric sales substantially due to lower
prices;
|
· |
$11 million
of decreases resulting from higher sales of sulfur dioxide emission
allowances in the prior period; partially offset
by,
|
· |
$39 million
of increases due to higher margins on non-physically settled system
balancing transactions.
|
Operating
Expenses (in millions)
Three-Month
Periods
|
|||||||||||||
Ended March 31,
|
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||
Energy
costs
|
$
|
415
|
$
|
548
|
$
|
133
|
24
|
%
|
|||||
Operations
and maintenance
|
262
|
274
|
12
|
4
|
|||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
121
|
113
|
(8
|
)
|
(7
|
)
|
|||||||
Taxes,
other than income taxes
|
28
|
24
|
(4
|
)
|
(17
|
)
|
|||||||
Total
operating expenses
|
$
|
826
|
$
|
959
|
$
|
133
|
14
|
17
Energy
costs
decreased $133 million, or 24%, primarily due to:
· |
$220 million
of decreases due to changes in the fair value of derivative contracts;
partially offset by,
|
· |
$33 million
of increases related to higher volumes and higher average prices
of
natural gas consumed primarily due to increased generation;
|
· |
$32 million
of increases in purchased electricity due to higher volumes and higher
average prices; and
|
· |
$19 million
of increases in cost of coal substantially due to higher
prices.
|
Operations
and maintenance expense
decreased $12 million, or 4%, primarily due to:
· |
$9 million
of decreases in annual incentive plan
expense;
|
· |
$6 million
of decreases in employee severance
costs;
|
· |
$4 million
of decreases resulting from penalties in the prior period; partially
offset by,
|
· |
$4 million
of increases in employee expenses, primarily due to higher pension
and
other post-retirement benefits costs;
and
|
· |
$3 million
of increases in materials and supplies
expense.
|
Depreciation
and amortization expense increased
$8 million, or 7%, primarily due to higher plant in service.
Interest
and Other (Income) Expense (in millions)
Three-Month
Periods
|
|||||||||||||
Ended March 31,
|
Favorable/(Unfavorable)
|
||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
$
|
75
|
$
|
69
|
$
|
(6
|
)
|
(9
|
)%
|
||||
Interest
income
|
(3
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
1
|
50
|
|||||||
Allowance
for borrowed funds
|
(7
|
)
|
(5
|
)
|
2
|
40
|
|||||||
Allowance
for equity funds
|
(7
|
)
|
(6
|
)
|
1
|
17
|
|||||||
Other
|
-
|
(2
|
)
|
(2
|
)
|
(100
|
)
|
||||||
Total
|
$
|
58
|
$
|
54
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
(7
|
)
|
Interest
expense
increased $6 million, or 9%, primarily due to higher average debt
outstanding and higher average variable rates during the three-month period
ended March 31, 2007.
Allowance
for borrowed and equity funds
increased $3 million, primarily due to higher qualified construction
work-in-progress balances during the three-month period ended March 31,
2007.
Income
Tax Expense
Income
tax expense
decreased $26 million, primarily due to a decrease in income before income
tax expense.
18
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Sources
and Uses of Cash
PacifiCorp
depends on both internal and external sources of liquidity to provide working
capital and to fund capital requirements. Short-term cash requirements not
met
by cash provided by operating activities are generally satisfied with proceeds
from short-term borrowings. Long-term cash needs are met through long-term
debt
issuances and through capital cash contributions from PacifiCorp’s direct parent
company, PPW Holdings LLC. PacifiCorp expects it will need additional periodic
equity contributions from its parent over the next several years. Issuance
of
long-term securities is influenced by levels of short-term debt, cash from
operations, capital expenditures, market conditions, regulatory approvals and
other considerations.
Operating
Activities
Net
cash
flows provided by operating activities increased $17 million to
$338 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007, compared
to $321 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2006,
primarily due to higher retail prices approved by regulators and the timing
of
cash collections and payments, partially offset by higher energy costs related
to generation and purchased electricity.
Investing
Activities
Net
cash
used in investing activities increased $24 million to $360 million for
the three-month period ended March 31, 2007, compared to $336 million
for the three-month period ended March 31, 2006, primarily due to higher
capital expenditures compared to the prior year. Capital expenditures totaled
$376 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2007, compared
to $333 million for the three-month period ended March 31, 2006.
Capital spending increased primarily due to wind generation investments,
including investments in the 140-MW Marengo Wind Project and other wind
projects. Other increases resulted from the construction and installation of
emission control equipment and various capital projects related to transmission
and distribution and other generation facilities. PacifiCorp spent approximately
$33 million and $17 million, excluding non-cash allowance for equity
funds used during construction, on these types of environmental projects during
the three-month periods ended March 31, 2007 and 2006, respectively. These
increases were partially offset by decreases in expenditures for the
construction of the Currant Creek Power Plant, which commenced full
combined-cycle operation in March 2006, and expenditures for the construction
of
the 534-MW Lake Side Power Plant, which were lower than the previous year.
Financing
Activities
Short-Term
Debt
PacifiCorp’s
short-term debt decreased by $181 million during the three-month period
ended March 31, 2007, to $216 million of commercial paper
arrangements, primarily due to the use of a portion of the proceeds from the
issuance of long-term debt, partially offset by capital expenditures in excess
of net cash from operations.
Regulatory
authorities limit PacifiCorp to $1.5 billion of short-term debt, of which
an aggregate principal amount of $216 million was outstanding at
March 31, 2007, with a weighted-average interest rate of 5.3%.
Revolving
Credit and Other Financing Agreements
PacifiCorp
has an $800 million unsecured revolving credit facility expiring in July
2011. The credit facility includes a variable-rate borrowing option based on
the
London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR) plus 0.195% that varies based on
PacifiCorp’s credit ratings for its senior unsecured long-term debt securities,
and which supports PacifiCorp’s commercial paper program. At March 31,
2007, there were no borrowings outstanding under this facility. In addition
to
this committed bank facility, PacifiCorp had $434 million in money market
accounts included in cash and cash equivalents at March 31, 2007, available
to meet its liquidity needs, as well as provide for future capital expenditures
and contractual obligations. See “Future Uses of Cash” below.
19
At
March 31, 2007, PacifiCorp had $518 million of standby letters of
credit and standby bond purchase agreements available to provide credit
enhancement and liquidity support for variable-rate pollution-control revenue
bond obligations. In addition, PacifiCorp had approximately $21 million of
standby letters of credit available to provide credit support for certain
transactions as requested by third parties. These committed bank arrangements
were all fully available at March 31, 2007 and expire periodically through
February 2011.
PacifiCorp’s
revolving credit and other financing agreements contain customary covenants
and
default provisions, including a covenant not to exceed a specified
debt-to-capitalization ratio of 0.65 to 1. At March 31, 2007, PacifiCorp
was in compliance with the covenants of its revolving credit and other financing
agreements.
Long-Term
Debt
During
the three-month period ended March 31, 2007, PacifiCorp issued
$600 million of its 5.75% Series of First Mortgage Bonds due April 1,
2037 and made scheduled long-term debt repayments of
$6 million.
During
the three-month period ended March 31, 2006, PacifiCorp made scheduled
long-term debt repayments of $100 million.
At
March 31, 2007, PacifiCorp had $900 million available under currently
effective SEC shelf registration statements covering future first mortgage
bond
and unsecured debt issuances. Also at March 31, 2007, PacifiCorp had
available state regulatory authority from the Oregon Public Utility Commission
(“OPUC”), Utah Public Service Commission (“UPSC”) and the Idaho Public Utility
Commission (“IPUC”) to issue up to an additional $900 million of long-term
debt. An additional filing would be required by the Washington Utilities and
Transportation Commission (“WUTC”) prior to any future issuances.
Common
Shareholder’s Capital
During
the three-month period ended March 31, 2006, PacifiCorp issued
9,902,728 shares of common stock to PacifiCorp Holdings, Inc. (“PHI”), its
former parent company, at a total price of $110 million.
Common
Dividends
During
the three-month period ended March 31, 2007, PacifiCorp did not declare or
pay any dividends on common stock. During the three-month period ended
March 31, 2006, PacifiCorp declared and paid a common stock dividend
totaling $17 million to PHI.
Future
Uses of Cash
Dividends
PacifiCorp
does not currently anticipate that it will declare or pay dividends on common
stock during the remainder of the year ending December 31, 2007.
Capital
Expenditure Program
As
of
March 31, 2007, estimated capital expenditures, which exclude non-cash
allowances for equity funds used during construction, for the year ending
December 31, 2007, are expected to be approximately $1,649 million,
which includes $763 million for ongoing operations projects, including new
connections related to customer growth, $781 million for generation
development and the related transmission projects, and $105 million for
emission control equipment to address current and anticipated air quality
regulations.
20
The
capital expenditure estimates are subject to a high degree variability based
on
several factors, including, among others highlighted in “Forward-Looking
Statements” above, future decisions arising from PacifiCorp’s Integrated
Resource Plan process, changes in regulations, laws and market conditions,
as
well as the outcomes of rate-making proceedings. Additionally, capital
expenditure needs are regularly reviewed by management and may change
significantly as a result of such reviews.
In
funding its capital expenditure program, PacifiCorp expects to obtain funds
required for construction and other purposes from sources similar to those
used
in the past, including operating cash flows, the issuance of new long-term
debt
and equity contributions from PacifiCorp’s direct parent company, PPW Holdings
LLC. The availability of capital will influence actual
expenditures.
The
estimate provided above for generation development projects for the year ending
December 31, 2007, includes the remaining costs to complete the 534-MW Lake
Side Power Plant, as well as upgrades of other generation plant equipment.
The
Lake Side Power Plant is expected to cost approximately $347 million,
including approximately $13 million of non-cash allowance for equity funds
used during construction, of which $295 million, including approximately
$12 million of non-cash allowance for equity funds used during
construction, had been incurred through March 31, 2007.
Also
included in the estimate for generation development projects are the remaining
costs for the construction of the 140-MW Marengo Wind Project and other
potential wind generation projects. PacifiCorp continues to pursue additional
cost-effective wind-powered generation.
Credit
Ratings
PacifiCorp’s
credit ratings at March 31, 2007, were as follows:
Moody’s
|
Standard
& Poor’s
|
||
Issuer/Corporate
|
Baa1
|
A-
|
|
Senior
secured debt
|
A3
|
A-
|
|
Senior
unsecured debt
|
Baa1
|
BBB+
|
|
Preferred
stock
|
Baa3
|
BBB
|
|
Commercial
paper
|
P-2
|
A-1
|
|
Outlook
|
Stable
|
Stable
|
In
conjunction with its risk management activities, PacifiCorp must meet credit
quality standards as required by counterparties. In accordance with industry
practice, contractual agreements that govern PacifiCorp’s energy management
activities either specifically provide bilateral rights to demand cash or other
security if credit exposures on a net basis exceed certain ratings-dependent
threshold levels, or provide the right for counterparties to demand “adequate
assurances” in the event of a material adverse change in PacifiCorp’s
creditworthiness. If one or more of PacifiCorp’s credit ratings decline below
investment grade, PacifiCorp would be required to post cash collateral, letters
of credit or other similar credit support to facilitate ongoing wholesale energy
management activities. At March 31, 2007, PacifiCorp’s credit ratings from
Standard & Poor’s and Moody’s were investment grade; however, if the ratings
fell more than one rating below investment grade, PacifiCorp’s estimated
potential collateral requirements would total approximately $397 million.
PacifiCorp’s potential collateral requirements could fluctuate considerably due
to seasonality, market prices and their volatility, a loss of key PacifiCorp
generating facilities or other related factors.
There
has
been no change in PacifiCorp’s credit ratings since December 31, 2006.
These ratings are subject to change or withdrawal at any time by the respective
credit ratings services. Each credit rating should be evaluated independently
of
any other rating.
21
For
a
further discussion of PacifiCorp’s credit ratings and their effect on
PacifiCorp’s business, see “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in PacifiCorp’s Transition Report
on Form 10-K for the nine-month period ended December 31,
2006.
Contractual
Obligations and Commercial Commitments
During
the three-month period ended March 31, 2007, there were no material changes
outside the ordinary course of business in the contractual obligations and
commercial commitments from the information provided in Item 7 of PacifiCorp’s
Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month period ended December 31,
2006, other than as described above, in March 2007, PacifiCorp issued
$600 million of its 5.75% First Mortgage Bonds due April 1,
2037.
Regulatory
Matters
In
addition to the discussion contained herein regarding updates to regulatory
matters based upon material changes that occurred during the three-month period
ended March 31, 2007, refer to Note 6 of Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements included in Item 1 for additional regulatory matter
updates.
Federal
Regulatory Matters
The
Bonneville Power Administration Residential Exchange Program
The
Northwest Power Act, through the Residential Exchange Program, provides access
to the benefits of low-cost federal hydroelectricity to the residential and
small-farm customers of the region’s investor-owned utilities. The program is
administered by the Bonneville Power Administration (the “BPA”) in accordance
with federal law. Pursuant to agreements between the BPA and PacifiCorp,
benefits from the BPA are passed through to PacifiCorp’s Oregon, Washington and
Idaho residential and small-farm customers in the form of electricity bill
credits. In October 2000, PacifiCorp entered into a settlement agreement
with
the BPA that provided Residential Exchange Program benefits to PacifiCorp’s
customers from October 2001 through September 2006. In May 2004, PacifiCorp,
the
BPA and other parties executed an additional agreement that provides for
a
guaranteed range of benefits to customers from October 2006 through September
2011.
Several
publicly owned utilities, cooperatives and the BPA’s direct-service industry
customers filed lawsuits against the BPA with the United States Ninth Circuit
Court of Appeals seeking review of certain aspects of the BPA’s Residential
Exchange Program, as well as challenging the level of benefits previously
paid
to investor-owned utility customers. On May 3, 2007, the United States
Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals issued two decisions. The first decision sets
aside the October 2000 Residential Exchange Program settlement agreement
as
being inconsistent with the BPA’s settlement authority. The second decision
holds, among other things, that the BPA acted contrary to law when it
allocated to its preference customers, which includes public utilities,
cooperatives and federal agencies, part of the costs of the October 2000
settlement the BPA reached with its investor-owned utility customers. These
United States Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals’ decisions could affect the amount
of benefits passed on to PacifiCorp’s customers. Because these benefits are
passed through to PacifiCorp’s customers, the outcome of this matter is not
expected to have a significant effect on PacifiCorp’s consolidated financial
results. There are several other lawsuits challenging certain aspects of
the BPA’s Residential Exchange Program pending at the United States Ninth
Circuit Court of Appeals for which the outcomes remain
unknown.
22
Hydroelectric
Relicensing
Klamath
Hydroelectric Project - (Klamath River, Oregon and California)
In
February 2004, PacifiCorp filed with the FERC a final application for a new
license to operate the 169-MW nameplate-rated Klamath hydroelectric project
in
anticipation of the March 2006 expiration of the existing license. PacifiCorp
is
currently operating under an annual license granted by the FERC and expects
to
continue to operate under annual licenses until the new operating license is
issued. As part of the relicensing process, the United States Departments of
Interior and Commerce filed proposed licensing terms and conditions with the
FERC in March 2006, which proposed that PacifiCorp construct upstream and
downstream fish passage facilities at the Klamath hydroelectric project’s four
mainstem dams. In April 2006, PacifiCorp filed alternatives to the federal
agencies’ proposal and requested an administrative hearing to challenge some of
the federal agencies’ factual assumptions supporting their proposal for the
construction of the fish passage facilities. A hearing was held in August 2006
before an administrative law judge. The administrative law judge issued a ruling
in September 2006 generally supporting the federal agencies’ factual
assumptions. In January 2007, the United States Departments of Interior and
Commerce filed modified terms and conditions consistent with March 2006 filings
and rejected the alternatives proposed by PacifiCorp. PacifiCorp is prepared
to
meet and implement the federal agencies’ terms and conditions as part of the
project’s relicensing. However, PacifiCorp expects to continue in settlement
discussions with various parties in the Klamath Basin area who have intervened
with the FERC licensing proceeding to try to achieve a mutually acceptable
outcome for the project.
Also,
as
part of the relicensing process, the FERC is required to perform an
environmental review. In September 2006, the FERC issued its draft environmental
impact statement on the Klamath hydroelectric project license. The public
comment period on the draft environmental impact statement closed on
December 1, 2006. The FERC is expected to issue its final environmental
impact statement in Spring 2007, after which other federal agencies will
complete their endangered species analyses. The states of Oregon and California
will need to issue water quality certifications prior to the FERC issuing
a
final license.
Prospect
Hydroelectric Project - (Rogue River, Oregon)
In
June
2003, PacifiCorp submitted a final license application to the FERC for the
Prospect Nos. 1, 2 and 4 hydroelectric projects, whose nameplate ratings total
37-MW. The Oregon Department of Environmental Quality issued a 401 Water Quality
Certificate for the project in April 2007, which effectively concludes the
license process. FERC is expected to issue a new Order before the end of May
2007.
State
Regulatory Actions
PacifiCorp
is currently pursuing a regulatory program in all states, with the objective
of
keeping rates closely aligned to ongoing costs. The following discussion
provides a state-by-state update based upon changes that occurred during the
three-month period ended March 31, 2007:
Oregon
In
April
2007, PacifiCorp filed its annual compliance filing with the OPUC to update
forecasted net power costs, requesting a 3.9% overall price increase,
approximately $36 million, to take effect January 1, 2008. The annual
filing, called the Transition Adjustment Mechanism, is due each April but will
be adjusted through November 2007 based on changes to forecasted power costs,
such as coal and gas prices and new contracts. PacifiCorp expects a
ruling from OPUC this fall.
23
Washington
In
October 2006, PacifiCorp filed a general rate case with the WUTC for an annual
increase of $23.2 million, or 10.2%. As part of the filing, PacifiCorp
proposed a Washington-only cost allocation methodology, which is based on
PacifiCorp’s western resources. The rate case included a five-year pilot on the
proposed allocation methodology and a power cost adjustment mechanism. In
its rebuttal case filed in March 2007, PacifiCorp reduced its request to
$19 million. Hearings were held in March 2007 with the matter to be fully
briefed by May 7, 2007. PacifiCorp anticipates that the WUTC will issue its
order in summer 2007.
Environmental
Matters
In
addition to the discussion contained herein, refer to Note 6 of Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in Item 1 and Item 1 of PacifiCorp’s
Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month period ended December 31,
2006, for additional information regarding certain environmental matters
affecting PacifiCorp’s operations.
As
a
result of increased attention to climate change in the United States, numerous
bills have been introduced in the current session of the United States Congress
that would reduce greenhouse gas emissions in the United States. Congressional
leadership has made climate change legislation a priority, and many
congressional observers expect to see the passage of climate change legislation
within the next several years. In April 2007, a United States Supreme Court
decision concluded that the Environmental Protection Agency (“EPA”) has the
authority under the Clean Air Act to regulate emissions of greenhouse gases
from
motor vehicles. In addition, pending cases that address the potential public
nuisance from greenhouse gas emissions from electricity generators and the
EPA’s
failure to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from new and existing coal-fired
plants are expected to become active. Furthermore, while debate continues
at the
national level over the direction of domestic climate policy, several states
have developed state-specific or regional legislative initiatives to reduce
greenhouse gas emissions, including California and the Northeastern states
and
individual state actions to regulate greenhouse gas emissions are likely
to
increase. The outcome of any pending judicial proceedings and federal and
state
climate change legislation and regulation cannot be determined at this time;
however, adoption of stringent limits on greenhouse gas emissions could
significantly impact PacifiCorp’s current and future fossil-fueled facilities,
and, therefore, its financial results.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
For
a
discussion of new accounting pronouncements affecting PacifiCorp, refer to
Note
2 of Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Item 1.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Certain
accounting policies require management to make estimates and judgments
concerning transactions that will be settled in the future. Amounts recognized
in the financial statements from such estimates are necessarily based on
numerous assumptions involving varying and potentially significant degrees
of
judgment and uncertainty. Accordingly, the amounts currently reflected in the
financial statements will likely increase or decrease in the future as
additional information becomes available. Estimates are used for, but not
limited to, accounting for the effects of certain types of regulation,
derivatives, accrued pension and postretirement expense, income taxes and
revenue recognition - unbilled revenues.
For
additional discussion of PacifiCorp’s critical accounting policies, see Item 7
of PacifiCorp’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month period ended
December 31, 2006. PacifiCorp’s critical accounting policies have not
changed materially since December 31, 2006, other than the adoption of
Financial Accounting Standards Board Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes - an interpretation of FASB Statement No.
109.”
24
For
quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risk affecting PacifiCorp,
see Item 7A of PacifiCorp’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month
period ended December 31, 2006. PacifiCorp’s exposure to market risk has
not changed materially since December 31, 2006.
Item 4. | Controls and Procedures. |
An
evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation
of PacifiCorp’s management, including the chief executive officer and chief
financial officer, regarding the effectiveness of the design and operation
of
PacifiCorp’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e)
promulgated under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended) as of
March 31, 2007. Based on that evaluation, PacifiCorp’s management,
including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, concluded
that PacifiCorp’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective. There have
been no changes during the quarter covered by this report in PacifiCorp’s
internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or
is
reasonably likely to materially affect, PacifiCorp’s internal control over
financial reporting.
25
Item 1. | Legal Proceedings. |
For
a
description of certain legal proceedings affecting PacifiCorp, review Item
3 of
PacifiCorp’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month period ended
December 31, 2006. Material developments to these proceedings during the
three-month period ended March 31, 2007, are included in Note 6 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in Item 1.
Item 1A. | Risk Factors. |
There
has
been no material change to PacifiCorp’s risk factors from those disclosed in
Item 1A of PacifiCorp’s Transition Report on Form 10-K for the nine-month period
ended December 31, 2006.
Not
applicable.
Item 3. | Defaults Upon Senior Securities. |
Not
applicable.
Not
applicable.
Item 5. | Other Information. |
Not
applicable.
Item 6. | Exhibits. |
The
exhibits listed on the accompanying Exhibit Index are filed as part of this
Quarterly Report.
26
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
PACIFICORP
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
Date:
May 7, 2007
|
/s/
David J. Mendez
|
David
J. Mendez
|
|
Senior
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer and officer
duly authorized to sign this report on behalf of
registrant
|
27
Exhibit
No.
|
Description
|
4*
|
Twentieth
Supplemental Indenture, dated as of March 1, 2007, to PacifiCorp’s
Mortgage and Deed of Trust dated as of January 9, 1989 (Exhibit 4,
Current
Report on Form 8-K, filed March 14, 2007, File No.
1-5152).
|
12.1
|
Statements
of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Fixed Charges.
|
12.2
|
Statements
of Computation of Ratio of Earnings to Combined Fixed Charges and
Preferred Stock Dividends.
|
15
|
Letter
Re: Unaudited Interim Financial Information.
|
31.1
|
Chief
Executive Officer’s Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
Chief
Financial Officer’s Certificate Pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Chief
Executive Officer’s Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.2
|
Chief
Financial Officer’s Certificate Pursuant to Section 906 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
*Incorporated
herein by reference.
28