PACKAGING CORP OF AMERICA - Annual Report: 2008 (Form 10-K)

 

UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549

 

 

Form 10-K

 

ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)

OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008

 

Commission file number 1-15399

 

 

PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)

 

 

Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

 

(847) 482-3000

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

 

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

 

None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.  Yes o     No þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes þ     No o

 

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of Registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.  þ

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  Yes o     No þ

 

At June 30, 2008, the last business day of the Registrant’s most recently completed second fiscal quarter, the aggregate market value of the Registrant’s common equity held by nonaffiliates was approximately $2,202,087,304 based on the closing sale price as reported on the New York Stock Exchange. This calculation of market value has been made for the purposes of this report only and should not be considered as an admission or conclusion by the Registrant that any person is in fact an affiliate of the Registrant.

 

On February 25, 2009, there were 102,398,867 shares of Common Stock outstanding.

 

DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE

 

Specified portions of the Proxy Statement for the Registrant’s 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders are incorporated by reference to the extent indicated in Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

INDEX

 

 

 

General

 

Packaging Corporation of America (we, us, our, “PCA” or the “Company”) is the fifth largest producer of containerboard and corrugated products in the United States in terms of production capacity. During 2008, we produced approximately 2.35 million tons of containerboard at our mills, of which about 80% was consumed in PCA’s corrugated products manufacturing plants, 11% was sold to domestic customers and 9% was sold in the export market. Our corrugated products manufacturing plants sold about 30.3 billion square feet (BSF) of corrugated products. Our net sales to third parties totaled $2.4 billion in 2008.

 

Containerboard Production and Corrugated Shipments

 

 

In 2008, we produced 1.44 million tons of kraft linerboard at our mills in Counce, Tennessee and Valdosta, Georgia, and 0.91 million tons of semi-chemical corrugating medium at our mills in Tomahawk, Wisconsin and Filer City, Michigan. We currently lease the cutting rights to approximately 91,000 acres of timberland located near our Counce and Valdosta mills. We also have supply agreements with third parties on approximately 359,000 acres of timberland.

 

Our corrugated products manufacturing plants produce a wide variety of corrugated packaging products, including conventional shipping containers used to protect and transport manufactured goods, multi-color boxes and displays with strong visual appeal that help to merchandise the packaged product in retail locations. In addition, we are a large producer of meat boxes and wax-coated boxes for the agricultural industry.

 

Industry Overview

 

According to the Fibre Box Association, the value of industry shipments of corrugated products was $26 billion in 2008.

 

The primary end-use markets for corrugated products are shown below (as reported in the most recent 2007 Fibre Box Association annual report):

 

 

Corrugated products plants tend to be located in close proximity to customers to minimize freight costs. The U.S. corrugated products industry consists of approximately 630 companies and 1,350 plants.

 

Containerboard, which includes both linerboard and corrugating medium, is the principal raw material used to manufacture corrugated products. Linerboard is used as the inner and outer facings, or liners, of corrugated products. Corrugating medium is fluted and laminated to linerboard in corrugator plants to produce

corrugated sheets. The sheets are subsequently printed, cut, folded and glued in corrugator plants or sheet plants to produce corrugated products.

 

Containerboard may be manufactured from both softwood and hardwood fibers, as well as from recycled fibers from used corrugated and waste from converting operations. Kraft linerboard is made predominantly from softwoods like pine. Semi-chemical corrugating medium is made from hardwoods such as oak. The finished paper product is wound into large rolls, which are slit to size as required and shipped to converters.

 

PCA Operations and Products

 

Our two linerboard mills can manufacture a broad range of linerboard grades ranging from 26 lb. to 96 lb. Our two semi-chemical corrugating medium mills can manufacture grades ranging in weight from 20 lb. to 47 lb. Mill capacities described below are estimated based on expected mix of paper basis weights. All four of our mills have completed an extensive independent review process to become ISO 9002 certified. ISO 9002 is an international quality certification that verifies a facility maintains and follows stringent procedures for manufacturing, sales and customer service.

 

The following four paragraphs describe our containerboard mills’ annual practical maximum capacity, 2008 actual production and production capabilities.

 

Counce.  Our Counce, Tennessee mill is one of the largest kraft linerboard mills in the United States. Its estimated production capacity, as reported to the American Forest and Paper Association (“AF&PA”), is approximately 1,007,000 tons per year. In 2008, we produced 970,000 tons of kraft linerboard on two paper machines at Counce. The mill produces a broad range of basis weights from 26 lb. to 90 lb. The mill also produces a variety of performance and specialty grades of linerboard.

 

Valdosta.  Our Valdosta, Georgia mill is a kraft linerboard mill that has an estimated production capacity of approximately 474,000 tons per year, as reported to the AF&PA. In 2008, our single paper machine at Valdosta produced 474,000 tons of kraft linerboard. Valdosta produces linerboard ranging from 35 lb. to 96 lb.

 

Tomahawk.  Our Tomahawk, Wisconsin mill is one of the largest semi-chemical corrugating medium mills in the United States with an estimated production capacity of 581,000 tons per year on three paper machines, as reported to the AF&PA. In April 2005, we completed the indefinite closure of our number three paper machine at Tomahawk and currently operate the remaining two paper machines which have a combined production capacity of 516,000 tons. In 2008, we produced 502,000 tons of semi-chemical corrugating medium on two paper machines at Tomahawk. One of the two paper machines we operate is among the largest corrugating medium machines in the world. The Tomahawk mill produces a broad range of basis weights from 23 lb. to 47 lb. and a variety of performance and specialty grades of corrugating medium.

 

Filer City.  Our Filer City, Michigan mill is a semi-chemical corrugating medium mill with an estimated production capacity of 413,000 tons on three paper machines, as reported to the AF&PA. In 2008, we produced 407,000 tons of corrugating medium at Filer City. Filer City produces corrugating medium grades ranging in basis weight from 20 lb. to 47 lb.

 

We operate 67 corrugated manufacturing operations, a technical and development center, five regional graphic design centers, a rotogravure printing operation and a complement of packaging supplies and distribution centers. Of the 67 manufacturing facilities, 40 operate as combining operations, commonly called corrugated plants, that manufacture corrugated sheets and finished corrugated containers. The remaining 27 manufacturing facilities, commonly called sheet plants, purchase combined sheets primarily produced at PCA’s combining operations and manufacture finished corrugated containers.

 

We have corrugated manufacturing operations in 26 states in the U.S., with no manufacturing facilities outside of the continental U.S. Each corrugated plant, for the most part, serves a market radius that typically averages 150 miles. Our sheet plants are generally located in close proximity to our larger corrugated plants, which enables us to offer additional services and converting capabilities such as small volume and quick turnaround items.

We produce a wide variety of products ranging from basic corrugated shipping containers to specialized packaging such as wax-coated boxes for the agriculture industry. We also have multi-color printing capabilities to make high-impact graphics boxes and displays that offer customers more attractive packaging.

 

Timberland

 

We currently lease the cutting rights to approximately 91,000 acres of timberland located near our Counce and Valdosta mills. Virtually all of the acres under cutting rights agreements are located within 100 miles of these two mills, which results in lower wood transportation costs and provides a secure source of wood fiber. These leased cutting rights agreements have terms with over 15 years remaining, on average.

 

During 1999 and 2000, PCA sold approximately 800,000 acres of timberland. We currently have in place supply agreements covering approximately 359,000 of the 800,000 acres sold. The majority of the acreage under supply agreement is located in close proximity to our Counce mill. We currently hold an approximate 29% equity ownership interest in approximately 51,000 acres owned by Southern Timber Venture, LLC (STV). This acreage is located primarily in southern Georgia and northern Florida, near our Valdosta, Georgia mill, and includes both timberlands and higher beneficial use properties.

 

In addition to the timberland we manage ourselves, our Forest Management Assistance Program provides professional forestry assistance to private timberland owners to improve harvest yields and to optimize their harvest schedule. We have managed the regeneration of approximately 125,000 acres by supplying pine seedlings. In exchange for our expertise, we are given the right of first refusal over timber sales from those lands. These private lands include over 145,000 acres of timberland. We expect to harvest approximately 80,000 cords of wood from these forests annually.

 

PCA also participates in the Sustainable Forestry Initiative. This initiative is aimed at ensuring the long-term health and conservation of America’s forestry resources. Activities include limiting tree harvest sizes, replanting harvest acreage, participating in flora and fauna research and protecting water streams.

 

Solid Wood Facilities

 

We own and operate one sawmill located in Ackerman, Mississippi. During 2008, the Ackerman sawmill sold 51 million board feet of lumber used in the building products and furniture industries. We also have an air-dry yard operation in Burnsville, Mississippi that holds newly cut lumber while it dries.

 

Sales and Marketing

 

Our corrugated products are sold through a direct sales and marketing organization. We have sales representatives and a sales manager at each corrugated manufacturing operation who serve local and regional accounts. We also have corporate account managers who serve large national accounts at multiple customer locations. Additionally, our graphic design centers maintain an on-site dedicated graphics sales force. In addition to direct sales and marketing personnel, we utilize new product development engineers and product graphics and design specialists. These individuals are located at both the corrugated plants and the graphic design centers. General marketing support is located at our corporate headquarters.

 

Our containerboard sales group is responsible for the sale of linerboard and corrugating medium to our corrugated plants, to other domestic customers and to the export market. This group handles order processing for all shipments of containerboard from our mills to our corrugated plants. These personnel also coordinate and execute all containerboard trade agreements with other containerboard manufacturers.

 

Distribution

 

Our corrugated products are usually delivered by truck due to our large number of customers and their demand for timely service. Shipping costs represent a relatively high percentage of our total costs due to the high bulk of corrugated products. As a result, our converting operations typically service customers within a 150 miles radius.

Containerboard produced in our mills is shipped by rail or truck. Rail shipments represent about 55% to 60% of the tons shipped and the remaining 40% to 45% is comprised of truck shipments. Our individual mills do not own or maintain outside warehousing facilities. We use third-party warehouses for short-term storage.

 

Customers

 

PCA’s corrugated products group sells to over 9,600 customers in over 17,500 locations. About two-thirds of our corrugated products customers are regional and local accounts, which are broadly diversified across industries and geographic locations. The remaining one-third of our customer base consists primarily of national accounts, or those customers with a national presence. These customers typically purchase corrugated products from several of our box plants throughout the United States.

 

Major Raw Materials Used

 

Fiber supply.  Fiber is the single largest cost in the manufacture of containerboard. PCA consumes both wood fiber and recycled fiber in its containerboard mills. We have no 100% recycled mills, or those mills whose fiber consumption consists solely of recycled fiber. To reduce our fiber costs, we have invested in processes and equipment to ensure a high degree of fiber flexibility. Our mills have the capability to shift a portion of their fiber consumption between softwood, hardwood and recycled sources. All of our mills, other than our Valdosta mill, can utilize some recycled fiber in their containerboard production. Our ability to use various types of virgin and recycled fiber helps mitigate the impact of changes in the prices of various fibers. Our corrugated manufacturing operations generate recycled fiber as a by-product from the manufacturing process, which is sold to our mills directly or through trade agreements. During 2008, our containerboard mills consumed approximately 590,000 tons of recycled fiber, and our corrugated converting operations generated approximately 195,000 tons of recycled fiber. As a result, PCA was a net recycled fiber buyer of 395,000 tons, or 17% of PCA’s total fiber requirements.

 

Energy supply.  Energy at the mills is obtained through purchased electricity or through various fuels, which are converted to steam or electricity on-site. Fuel sources include coal, natural gas, oil, internally produced and purchased bark and by-products of the containerboard manufacturing and pulping process. These fuels are burned in boilers to produce steam. Steam turbine generators are used to produce electricity. To reduce our mill energy cost, we have invested in processes and equipment to ensure a high level of purchased fuel flexibility. In recent history, natural gas and fuel oil have exhibited higher costs per thermal unit and more price volatility than coal and bark. During 2008, 11.7 million MMBTU’s (million BTU’s), or approximately 75% of our mills’ purchased fuel needs, were from purchased bark and coal, historically our two lowest cost purchased fuels. For the same period, our mills consumed about 2.5 million MMBTU’s of natural gas (16% of the mills’ total purchased fuels) and 1.0 million MMBTU’s of oil (7% of the mills’ total purchased fuels). Our two kraft linerboard mills at Counce and Valdosta generate more than two-thirds of their fuel requirements from their own by-products.

 

PCA’s corrugated plants each have a boiler that produces steam which is used by the corrugator. The majority of these boilers burn natural gas, although some also have the ability to burn fuel oil. During 2008, PCA’s corrugated products plants consumed approximately 2.0 million MMBTU’s of natural gas.

The following table shows PCA’s purchased fuel consumption by fuel type for 2008:

 

 

Approximately 40% of the electricity consumed by our four mills is generated on-site. Our mills purchase approximately 9,445,000 CkWh (hundred kilowatt hours) annually, or the equivalent of 3.2 million MMBTU’s. PCA’s corrugated products plants purchase about 2,290,000 CkWh annually, or the equivalent of 0.8 million MMBTU’s.

 

Competition

 

According to industry sources, corrugated products are produced by about 630 U.S. companies operating approximately 1,350 plants. Most corrugated products are manufactured to the customer’s specifications. Corrugated producers generally sell within a 150-mile radius of their plants and compete with other corrugated producers in their local market. In fact, the Fibre Box Association tracks industry data by 47 distinct market regions.

 

The larger, multi-plant integrated companies may also solicit larger, multi-plant customers who purchase for all of their facilities on a consolidated basis. These customers are often referred to as national or corporate accounts.

 

Corrugated products businesses seek to differentiate themselves through pricing, quality, service, design and product innovation. We compete for both local and national account business and we compete against producers of other types of packaging products. On a national level, our competitors include International Paper Company, Koch Industries, Inc., Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation and Temple-Inland Inc. However, with our strategic focus on local and regional accounts, we also compete with the smaller, independent converters.

 

Our principal competitors with respect to sales of our containerboard produced but not consumed at our own corrugated products plants are a number of large, diversified paper companies, including International Paper Company, Koch Industries, Inc., Smurfit-Stone Container Corporation and Temple-Inland Inc., as well as other regional manufacturers. Containerboard is generally considered a commodity-type product and can be purchased from numerous suppliers.

 

Employees

 

As of December 31, 2008, we had approximately 8,100 employees. Approximately 2,400 of these employees were salaried and approximately 5,700 were hourly. Approximately 75% of our hourly employees are represented by unions. The majority of our unionized employees are represented by the United Steel

Workers (USW), the International Brotherhood of Teamsters (IBT) and the International Association of Machinists (IAM).

 

Based on an agreement reached with the USW in August 2008, the existing labor agreements at our containerboard mills covering USW-represented employees (91% of mill hourly workforce) were extended five years. With this extension, the USW contracts at our mills are currently set to expire between September 2013 and June 2015. Agreements with other union mill employees (9% of mill hourly workforce) expire between October 2009 and June 2012. Contracts for unionized corrugated products plant employees expire between February 2009 and November 2014. We are currently in negotiations to renew or extend any union contracts that have recently expired or are expiring in the near future.

 

During 2008, we experienced no work stoppages and have experienced no instances of significant work stoppages in the five years prior to 2008. We believe we have satisfactory relations with our employees.

 

Environmental Matters

 

Compliance with environmental requirements is a significant factor in our business operations. We commit substantial resources to maintaining environmental compliance and managing environmental risk. We are subject to, and must comply with, a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws, particularly those relating to air and water quality, waste disposal and the cleanup of contaminated soil and groundwater. The most significant of these laws affecting us are:

 

1. Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA)

 

2. Clean Water Act (CWA)

 

3. Clean Air Act (CAA)

 

4. The Emergency Planning and Community Right-to-Know-Act (EPCRA)

 

5. Toxic Substance Control Act (TSCA)

 

6. Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA)

 

We believe that we are currently in material compliance with these and all applicable environmental rules and regulations. Because environmental regulations are constantly evolving, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, costs to maintain compliance with these and other environmental laws. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we spent approximately $23.5 million to comply with the requirements of these and other environmental laws. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the costs of environmental compliance were approximately $19.4 million and $17.5 million, respectively. We work diligently to anticipate and budget for the impact of applicable environmental regulations, and do not currently expect that future environmental compliance obligations will materially affect our business or financial condition.

 

In 1998, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized a Clean Air and Water Act commonly referred to as the Cluster Rule. The Cluster Rules govern allowable discharges of air and water pollutants at all pulp and paper mill operations. As a result, PCA and its competitors were required to incur costs to ensure compliance with these rules. We completed all of our projects related to Cluster Rule requirements in 2006 and, as a result, do not anticipate any further capital expenditures related to ensuring compliance with the Cluster Rules. From 1997 through 2006, we spent approximately $39.2 million to ensure compliance with the Cluster Rule requirements. Total capital costs for environmental matters were $3.5 million for 2008. We currently estimate 2009 environmental capital expenditures will be $1.5 million.

 

As is the case with any industrial operation, we have in the past incurred costs associated with the remediation of soil or groundwater contamination. From 1994 through 2008, remediation costs at our mills and converting plants totaled approximately $3.2 million. We do not believe that any ongoing remedial projects are material in nature. As of December 31, 2008, we maintained an environmental reserve of $8.3 million, which includes funds relating to on-site landfill and surface impoundments as well as ongoing and anticipated remedial projects. Of the $8.3 million reserve, $4.2 million is reserved for our landfill

obligations, which are accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations.” We believe these reserves are adequate.

 

We could also incur environmental liabilities as a result of claims by third parties for civil damages, including liability for personal injury or property damage, arising from releases of hazardous substances or contamination. We are not aware of any material claims of this type currently pending against us.

 

On April 12, 1999, Pactiv Corporation, formerly known as Tenneco Packaging Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of Tenneco Inc., sold its containerboard and corrugated products business to PCA, an entity formed by Madison Dearborn Partners, LLC, a private equity investment firm. As a part of the April 12, 1999 transaction, Pactiv agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with pre-closing offsite waste disposal. Pactiv also retained environmental liability for a closed landfill located near the Filer City mill.

 

As of this filing, we believe that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures above the $8.3 million accrued as of December 31, 2008 will have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

Available Information

 

PCA’s internet website address is www.packagingcorp.com. Our annual reports on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K, and amendments to those reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 are available free of charge through our website as soon as reasonably practicable after they are electronically filed with, or furnished to, the Securities and Exchange Commission. In addition, our Code of Ethics may be accessed in the Investor Relations section of PCA’s website. PCA’s website and the information contained or incorporated therein are not intended to be incorporated into this report.

 

Financial Information About Segments

 

We operate as one segment and our revenues are generated primarily in one geographic segment. See “Segment Information” of Note 2 — Summary of Significant Accounting Policies contained in the “Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.”

 

 

Some of the statements in this report and, in particular, statements found in Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations, that are not historical in nature are forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements are often identified by the words “will,” “should,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “expect,” “intend,” “estimate,” “hope,” or similar expressions. These statements reflect management’s current views with respect to future events and are subject to risks and uncertainties. There are important factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those in forward-looking statements, many of which are beyond our control. These factors, risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, the factors described below.

 

Our actual results, performance or achievement could differ materially from those expressed in, or implied by, these forward-looking statements, and accordingly, we can give no assurances that any of the events anticipated by the forward-looking statements will transpire or occur, or if any of them do so, what impact they will have on our results of operations or financial condition. In view of these uncertainties, investors are cautioned not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. We expressly disclaim any obligation to publicly revise any forward-looking statements that have been made to reflect the occurrence of events after the date hereof.

Industry Risks

 

Industry Earnings Cyclicality — Imbalances of supply and demand for containerboard could affect the price at which we can sell containerboard and corrugated products, and as a result, could result in lower selling prices and earnings.

 

The price of containerboard could fall if the supply of containerboard available for sale in the market exceeds the demand. The demand for containerboard is driven by market needs for containerboard in the United States and abroad to manufacture corrugated shipping containers. Market needs or demand are driven by both global and U.S. business conditions, which severely weakened during the fourth quarter of 2008. If supply exceeds demand, prices for containerboard and corrugated products could decline, resulting in decreased earnings and cash generated from operations.

 

Competition — The intensity of competition in the containerboard and corrugated packaging industry could result in downward pressure on pricing and volume, which could lower earnings and cash generated from operations.

 

The containerboard and corrugated products industry is highly competitive, with no single containerboard or corrugated packaging producer having a dominant position. Containerboard cannot generally be differentiated by producer, which tends to intensify price competition. The corrugated packaging industry is also sensitive to changes in economic conditions, as well as other factors including innovation, design, quality and service. To the extent that one or more competitors are more successful with respect to any key competitive factor, our business could be adversely affected. Our products also compete, to some extent, with various other packaging materials, including products made of paper, plastics, wood and various types of metal. The intensity of competition could lead to a reduction in our market share as well as lower sales prices for our products, both of which could reduce our earnings and cash flow.

 

Company Risks

 

Cost of Fiber — An increase in the cost of fiber could increase our manufacturing costs and lower our earnings.

 

PCA has supply agreements at market prices for wood fiber to be consumed at three of our four mills on approximately 359,000 acres of timberland. In addition to these supply agreements, PCA also secures wood fiber from various other sources at market prices.

 

PCA purchases recycled fiber for use at three of its four containerboard mills. PCA currently purchases, net of recycled fiber generated at its box plants, approximately 395,000 tons of recycled fiber per year.

 

The market price of wood fiber varies based upon availability and source. In addition, the increase in demand of products manufactured, in whole or in part, from recycled fiber, on a global basis, has caused an occasional tightening in the supply of recycled fiber. These periods of supply and demand imbalance have tended to create significant price volatility. Periods of above average fiber costs and unusual price volatility have occurred in the past and may occur again in the future, which could result in lower or volatile earnings.

 

Cost of Purchased Energy and Chemicals — An increase in the cost of purchased energy and chemicals could lead to higher manufacturing costs, resulting in reduced earnings.

 

PCA has the capability to use various types of purchased fuels in its manufacturing operations, including coal, bark, natural gas and oil. Energy prices, in particular prices for oil and natural gas, have fluctuated dramatically in the past and have risen substantially in recent years. In addition, costs for key chemicals used in our manufacturing have risen. These fluctuations impact our manufacturing costs and result in earnings volatility. If energy and chemical prices rise, our production costs will increase, which will lead to higher manufacturing costs and reduced earnings.

Material Disruption of Manufacturing — A material disruption at one of our manufacturing facilities could prevent us from meeting customer demand, reduce our sales and/or negatively impact our results of operation and financial condition.

 

Our business depends on continuous operation of our facilities, particularly at our mills. Any of our manufacturing facilities, or any of our machines within such facilities, could cease operations unexpectedly for a long period of time due to a number of events, including unscheduled maintenance outages; prolonged power failures; an equipment failure; explosion of a boiler; labor difficulties; natural catastrophes; terrorism; governmental regulations; and other operational problems. These events could lead to higher costs and reduced earnings.

 

Environmental Matters — PCA may incur significant environmental liabilities with respect to both past and future operations.

 

We are subject to, and must comply with, a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws, particularly those relating to air and water quality, waste disposal and the cleanup of contaminated soil and groundwater. Because environmental regulations are constantly evolving, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, costs to maintain compliance with those laws. See Item 1. “Business — Environmental Matters” for certain estimates of expenditures we expect to make for environmental compliance in the next few years. Although we have established reserves to provide for future environmental liability, these reserves may not be adequate. In addition, enactment of new environmental laws or regulations or changes in existing laws or regulations might require significant expenditures.

 

Investment Risks

 

Market Price of our Common Stock — The market price of our common stock may be volatile, which could cause the value of your investment to decline.

 

Securities markets worldwide have recently experienced significant price declines and volume fluctuations. This market volatility, as well as general economic, market or political conditions, could reduce the market price of our common stock in spite of our operating performance. In addition, our operating results could be below the expectations of public market analysts and investors, and in response, the market price of our common stock could decrease significantly.

 

General Risks

 

Economic Conditions — Our earnings and cash generated from operations could be significantly lower as a result of the severe and possibly prolonged downturn in the U.S. economy.

 

Our operations and financial performance are directly impacted by changes in the U.S. economy, and to a lesser extent, by global economic conditions. The significant downturn in the U.S. economy during the fourth quarter of 2008 significantly lowered the demand for our products. As a result, to balance the production of containerboard at our mills with demand, we reduced our fourth quarter mill production by 90,000 tons and operated our mills at about 85% of capacity. This lower demand and production reduced our revenues, increased our unit production costs, and lowered our earnings and our cash generated from operations. It is uncertain if economic conditions will deteriorate further, or when economic conditions will improve. Until economic conditions improve, our operating and financial performance will continue to be adversely impacted. Lower earnings and reduced cash flow could impact our ability to fund operations, capital requirements, and common stock dividend payments, and a prolonged and severe downturn could possibly impact our ability to comply with our debt convenants.

 

 

None.

 

The table below provides a summary of our containerboard mills, the principal products produced and each mill’s annual practical maximum capacity based upon all of our paper machines’ production capabilities:

 

 

 

 

We currently own our four containerboard mills and 44 of our corrugated manufacturing operations (37 corrugated plants and seven sheet plants). We also own one sawmill, an air-drying yard, one warehouse and miscellaneous other property, which includes sales offices and woodlands forest management offices. These sales offices and woodlands forest management offices generally have one to four employees and serve as administrative offices. PCA leases the space for three corrugated plants, 20 sheet plants, five regional design centers, and numerous other distribution centers, warehouses and facilities. The equipment in these leased facilities is, in virtually all cases, owned by PCA, except for forklifts and other rolling stock which are generally leased.

 

We lease the cutting rights to approximately 91,000 acres of timberland located near our Valdosta mill (80,000 acres) and our Counce mill (11,000 acres). On average, these cutting rights agreements have terms with over 15 years remaining.

 

We currently lease space for our corporate headquarters in Lake Forest, Illinois. The lease for the Lake Forest, Illinois facility is a short term, facility use agreement lease with automatic renewal rights. Specifically, this lease is a continuous month-to-month lease with unlimited automatic renewals entitling either party the right to terminate the lease with at least 8 months notice.

 

We currently believe that our owned and leased space for facilities and properties are sufficient to meet our operating requirements for the foreseeable future.

 

 

PCA is a party to various legal actions arising in the ordinary course of our business. These legal actions cover a broad variety of claims spanning our entire business. As of the date of this filing, we believe it is not reasonably possible that the resolution of these legal actions will, individually or in the aggregate, have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

 

No matters were submitted to a vote of security holders in the fourth quarter of 2008.

 

 

Brief statements setting forth the age at February 25, 2009, the principal occupation, employment during the past five years, the year in which such person first became an officer of PCA, and other information concerning each of our executive officers appears below.

Paul T. Stecko is 64 years old and has served as Chief Executive Officer of PCA since January 1999 and as Chairman of PCA since March 1999. From November 1998 to April 1999, Mr. Stecko served as President and Chief Operating Officer of Tenneco Inc. From January 1997 to November 1998, Mr. Stecko served as Chief Operating Officer of Tenneco. From December 1993 through January 1997, Mr. Stecko served as President and Chief Executive Officer of Tenneco Packaging Inc. Prior to joining Tenneco Packaging, Mr. Stecko spent 16 years with International Paper Company. Mr. Stecko is a member of the board of directors of Tenneco Inc., Smurfit Kappa Group Limited, State Farm Mutual Insurance Company and American Forest and Paper Association.

 

William J. Sweeney is 68 years old and has served as Executive Vice President — Corrugated Products of PCA since April 1999. From May 1997 to April 1999, Mr. Sweeney served as Executive Vice President — Paperboard Packaging of Tenneco Packaging Inc. From May 1990 to May 1997, Mr. Sweeney served as Senior Vice President and General Manager — Containerboard Products of Tenneco Packaging. From 1983 to May 1990, Mr. Sweeney served as General Manager and Vice President of Stone Container Corporation. From 1978 to 1983, Mr. Sweeney served as Sales Manager, Operations Manager and Division Vice President at Continental Group and from 1967 to 1978, as Sales Manager and General Manager of Boise Cascade Corporation.

 

Mark W. Kowlzan is 53 years old and has served as Senior Vice President — Containerboard of PCA since March 2002 and as Vice President from April 1999 to March 2002. From 1998 to April 1999, Tenneco Packaging Inc. employed Mr. Kowlzan as Vice President and General Manager — Containerboard and from May 1996 to 1998, as Operations Manager and Mill Manager of the Counce mill. Prior to joining Tenneco Packaging, Mr. Kowlzan spent 15 years at International Paper Company, where he held a series of operational positions within its mill organization.

 

Richard B. West is 56 years old and has served as Chief Financial Officer of PCA since March 1999 and as Senior Vice President since March 2002. From April 1999 to June 2007, Mr. West served as our Corporate Secretary. From April 1999 to March 2002, Mr. West served as Vice President and from March 1999 to June 1999, Mr. West also served as Treasurer of PCA. Mr. West served as Vice President of Finance — Paperboard Packaging of Tenneco Packaging Inc. from 1995 to April 1999. Prior to joining Tenneco Packaging, Mr. West spent 20 years with International Paper Company where he served as an Internal Auditor, Internal Audit Manager and Manufacturing Controller for the Printing Papers Group and Director/Business Process Redesign.

 

Stephen T. Calhoun is 63 years old and has served as Vice President, Human Resources of PCA since November 2002. From July 1997 to October 2002, Mr. Calhoun served as Director, Human Resources of Corporate and Containerboard Division. From April 1989 to July 1997, Mr. Calhoun was employed principally by Tenneco Packaging Inc. where he held the positions of Area Employee Relations Manager and Human Resources Manager. Prior to joining Tenneco Packaging in 1989, Mr. Calhoun spent 15 years with American Can Company where he held several human resources and manufacturing positions.

 

Thomas A. Hassfurther is 53 years old and has served as Senior Vice President, Sales and Marketing, Corrugated Products since February 2005 and as Vice President, Sales and Marketing from March 1998 to February 2005. Mr. Hassfurther served as Vice President and Area General Manager from January 1991 to February 1998 for Tenneco Packaging Inc. From 1977 to 1990, Mr. Hassfurther served as a Sales Representative, Sales Manager and General Manager within the Containerboard Products Group.

 

 

Market Information

 

PCA’s common stock is listed on the New York Stock Exchange under the symbol “PKG”. The following table sets forth the high and low sale prices and dividends as reported by the New York Stock Exchange during the last two years.

 

 

Stockholders

 

As of February 25, 2009, there were 99 holders of record of our common stock.

 

Dividend Policy

 

PCA expects to continue to pay regular cash dividends, although there is no assurance as to the timing or level of future dividend payments because they depend on future earnings, capital requirements and financial condition.

 

Sales of Unregistered Securities

 

No equity securities of PCA were sold by PCA during fiscal year 2008 which were not registered under the Securities Act of 1933.

 

Purchases of Equity Securities

 

Stock Repurchase Programs

 

On October 17, 2007, PCA announced that its Board of Directors had authorized a $150.0 million common stock repurchase program. There is no expiration date for the common stock repurchase program. Through December 31, 2008, the Company repurchased 3,818,729 shares of common stock for $85.0 million. All repurchased shares were retired prior to December 31, 2008.

 

The following table summarizes the Company’s stock repurchases in the fourth quarter of 2008:

 

Performance Graph

 

The graph below compares PCA’s cumulative 5-year total shareholder return on common stock with the cumulative total returns of the S&P 500 index; the S&P Midcap 400 index; a New Peer Group that includes three companies, which are International Paper Company, Smurfit-Stone Container Corp. and Temple Inland Inc.; and an Old Peer Group of four companies, which are International Paper Company, Smurfit-Stone Container Corp., Temple Inland Inc. and Weyerhaeuser Company. Peer Group member Weyerhaeuser was dropped from the Old Peer Group comparison due to the sale of its containerboard, packaging and recycling business to International Paper Company in August 2008. The graph tracks the performance of a $100 investment in our common stock, in each index, and in the peer groups (including the reinvestment of all dividends) from December 31, 2003 through December 31, 2008. The stock price performance included in this graph is not necessarily indicative of future stock price performance.

 

COMPARISON OF 5 YEAR CUMULATIVE TOTAL RETURN*
Among Packaging Corporaton of America, The S&P 500 Index,
The S&P Midcap 400 Index, An Old Peer Group And A New Peer Group

 

 

 

Copyright^© 2009 S&P, a division of The McGraw-Hill Companies Inc. All rights reserved.

 

 

The information in the graph and table above is not deemed “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference in any of PCA’s filings under the Securities Act of 1933 or the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, whether made before or after the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, except to the extent that PCA specifically incorporates such information by reference.

 

The following table sets forth the selected historical financial data of PCA. The information contained in the table should be read in conjunction with “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the historical consolidated financial statements of PCA, including the notes thereto, contained elsewhere in this report.

 

 

 

 

 

The following discussion of historical results of operations and financial condition should be read in conjunction with the audited financial statements and the notes thereto which appear elsewhere in this report.

 

Overview

 

PCA is the fifth largest producer of containerboard and corrugated products in the United States, based on production capacity. We operate four containerboard mills and 67 corrugated products manufacturing plants throughout the United States. Approximately 80% of the containerboard tons produced at our mills are consumed in our corrugated products manufacturing plants. The remaining 20% is sold to domestic customers or the export market. We produce a wide variety of corrugated products ranging from basic corrugated shipping containers to specialized packaging such as wax-coated boxes for the agriculture industry. We also

have multi-color printing capabilities to make high-impact graphics boxes and displays that offer our customers more attractive packaging.

 

In analyzing our operating performance, we focus on the following factors that affect our business and are important to consider when reviewing our financial and operating results:

 

 

The market for containerboard and corrugated products is generally subject to changes in the U.S. economy. Historically, supply and demand, as well as industry-wide inventory levels, have influenced prices of containerboard and corrugated products. In addition to U.S. shipments, approximately 10% of domestically produced containerboard has been exported for use in other countries.

 

The U.S. economy experienced a severe downturn in the fourth quarter of 2008 and, as a result, reported industry shipments of corrugated products decreased 10% for this period compared to 2007. During this same period, reported industry containerboard production levels decreased 14% from fourth quarter of 2007 levels. The total industry reported containerboard mill production for December was the lowest monthly production in over 15 years. As reported by industry publications, linerboard prices decreased $10 per ton and corrugating medium prices decreased $20 per ton in December 2008, and additional price decreases of $10 per ton for both linerboard and corrugating medium were reported by industry publications in both January and February 2009. Average prices for linerboard and corrugating medium ended 2008 at $45 per ton and $35 per ton, respectively, higher than December 2007 levels, reflecting the July 2008 $55 per ton increase, partially offset by the December pricing decline.

 

The cost to manufacture containerboard is dependent, in large part, on the costs of wood fiber, recycled fiber, purchased fuels, electricity, labor and fringe benefits. While energy and other costs are significant in the manufacture of corrugated products, labor and fringe benefits make up the largest component of corrugated products’ manufactured costs besides the cost of containerboard.

 

Our costs for purchased fuels averaged approximately 30% higher for the full year 2008 compared to 2007, while transportation and electricity costs rose more modestly from prior year levels. Recycled fiber costs in 2008 were lower than in 2007 and at the end of 2008 were about 75% below year-end 2007 levels. Wood fiber costs in 2008 were higher than they were in 2007 and, at the end of 2008, about 5% higher than they were in December 2007. Chemical costs were also higher during 2008 compared to 2007; this was particularly significant in the second half of 2008 and is expected to continue into at least the first part of 2009.

 

For the year ended December 31, 2008, PCA’s earnings were negatively impacted by increased costs during the first three quarters and by the severe economic downturn in the fourth quarter. For the full year, 2008 earnings were approximately 20% below the record earnings level set in 2007, but still represented our second highest earnings for a fiscal year, excluding special items, since becoming a standalone company in April 1999. The reduction in earnings was primarily driven by decreased sales volume for both containerboard and corrugated products. Fourth quarter corrugated products sales volume was down 9.9% compared to the fourth quarter of 2007 and market related downtime and machine slowbacks reduced mill production by 90,000 tons. This downtime was the most downtime our mills have taken in a quarter since becoming a standalone company. Sales prices rose compared to 2007 with the implementation of the containerboard price increase in July 2008 and the corresponding corrugated products price increases. Partially offsetting the beneficial impact of the price increases were cost increases mentioned previously in energy, chemicals and wood fiber in addition to higher labor and fringe benefits costs, including medical costs.

 

In the first quarter 2009, our Valdosta mill will be down for its annual maintenance outage and in addition, market related downtime is likely. Energy usage will be higher with colder weather, and we also

expect higher chemical costs. Considering these items and with the current economic conditions and uncertainty, we expect our first quarter 2009 earnings to be lower than our earnings in the fourth quarter of 2008.

 

Results of Operations

 

Year Ended December 31, 2008 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2007

 

The historical results of operations of PCA for the years ended December 31, 2008 and 2007 are set forth below:

 

 

Net Sales

 

Net sales increased by $44.5 million, or 1.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 from the year ended December 31, 2007. Net sales increased primarily due to increased sales prices of corrugated products and containerboard ($111.0 million), partially offset by the impact of lower sales volume ($66.5 million).

 

Total corrugated products volume sold decreased 2.9% to 30.3 billion square feet in 2008 compared to 31.2 billion square feet in 2007. On a comparable shipment-per-workday basis, corrugated products sales volume decreased 3.3% in 2008 from 2007. Shipments-per-workday is calculated by dividing our total corrugated products volume during the year by the number of workdays within the year. The larger percentage decrease on a shipment-per-workday basis was due to the fact that 2008 had one more workday (252 days), those days not falling on a weekend or holiday, than 2007 (251 days). Containerboard sales volume to external domestic and export customers decreased 11.7% to 478,000 tons for the year ended December 31, 2008 from 541,000 tons in 2007.

 

Income from Operations

 

Income from operations decreased by $51.7 million, or 17.6%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to 2007. The decrease in income from operations was primarily attributable to increased energy and energy related costs including transportation ($56.2 million), lower sales volume ($44.4 million), increased costs for wood fiber ($25.1 million), labor ($17.6 million), medical ($8.9 million), bad debts ($4.1 million), legal matters ($3.4 million), start-up costs of two major mill projects ($3.2 million) and fixed asset disposals ($3.1 million). The impact of higher costs and lower volume was partially offset by increased sales prices ($111.0 million) and lower recycled fiber costs ($3.6 million).

 

Gross profit decreased $33.3 million, or 6.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 from the year ended December 31, 2007. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales decreased from 22.7% of net sales in the year ended December 31, 2007 to 20.8% of net sales in the year ended December 31, 2008 primarily due to the cost increases and reduced sales volume described previously.

 

Selling and administrative expenses increased $3.8 million, or 2.2%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 from the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily the result of higher expenses related

to labor and fringe benefit costs ($1.5 million), warehousing costs due to customer requirements ($1.5 million) and travel, meeting and entertainment expenses ($0.5 million).

 

Corporate overhead for the year ended December 31, 2008 increased $4.8 million, or 8.6%, from the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to increased salary and fringe benefit expenses ($4.5 million).

 

Other expense, net, increased $8.8 million, or 134.5% for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily due to higher legal related costs ($3.4 million), fixed asset disposal costs ($3.1 million), storm damage to our facilities ($1.0 million) and a gain on sale of land occurring in 2007 ($0.8 million).

 

Interest Expense, Net and Income Taxes

 

Interest expense, net of interest income, increased by $6.1 million, or 23.8%, for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007, primarily as a result of lower interest income ($6.2 million) earned on PCA’s cash equivalents, partially offset by lower interest expense ($0.1 million) related to PCA’s outstanding debt balances. The $6.2 million decrease in interest income was due both to lower interest income rates and lower cash balances during 2008 compared to 2007. The $0.1 million decrease in interest expense was due to a $2.4 million decrease in interest expense related to the Company’s receivables credit facility due to lower interest rates and a $1.4 million decrease in term loan interest expense as a result of the repayment of the term loan in March 2008. This was almost completely offset by a $3.7 million increase in interest expense related to the issuance in March 2008 of PCA’s 61/2% notes due 2018, the proceeds of which were used to repay the 43/8% notes due August 2008.

 

PCA’s effective tax rate was 35.5% for the year ended December 31, 2008 and 36.5% for the year ended December 31, 2007. The effective tax rate varies from the U.S. federal statutory tax rate of 35.0% principally due to the impact of state and local income taxes offset by the domestic manufacturers’ deduction. PCA had no material changes impacting FIN No. 48 in 2008.

 

Year Ended December 31, 2007 Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2006

 

The historical results of operations of PCA for the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006 are set forth below:

 

 

Net Sales

 

Net sales increased by $129.0 million, or 5.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the year ended December 31, 2006. Approximately $123.1 million of the increase resulted from higher sales prices and approximately $5.9 million of the increase resulted from higher sales volumes.

 

The increased sales prices resulted from the August 2007 increase in containerboard prices and the realization of those price increases in our sales of corrugated products.

Total corrugated products volume sold decreased 0.3% to 31.2 billion square feet in 2007 compared to 31.3 billion square feet in 2006. On a comparable shipment-per-workday basis, corrugated products sales volume decreased 1.1% in 2007 from 2006. Shipments-per-workday is calculated by dividing our total corrugated products volume during the year by the number of workdays within the year. The larger percentage decrease on a shipment-per-workday basis was due to the fact that 2007 had two more workdays (251 days), those days not falling on a weekend or holiday, than 2006 (249 days). Containerboard sales volume to external domestic and export customers increased 12.3% to 541,000 tons for the year ended December 31, 2007 from 482,000 tons in 2006.

 

Income from Operations

 

Income from operations increased by $67.6 million, or 29.9%, for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase in income from operations was primarily attributable to higher sales prices and volume ($120.1 million), partially offset by increased costs for recycled fiber ($16.8 million), wage increases for hourly and salaried personnel ($16.8 million), medical, pension, benefit and incentive costs ($6.3 million), transportation costs ($5.4 million), wood fiber costs ($3.1 million) and the impact of a fourth quarter 2007 unplanned outage at the Counce, Tennessee linerboard mill ($5.0 million, net of insurance recovery).

 

Gross profit increased $81.1 million, or 18.3%, for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the year ended December 31, 2006. Gross profit as a percentage of net sales increased from 20.3% of net sales in 2006 to 22.7% of net sales in the current year primarily due to the increased sales prices described previously.

 

Selling and administrative expenses increased $10.6 million, or 6.7%, for the year ended December 31, 2007 from the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily the result of increased salary and incentive compensation expense ($6.3 million) and related fringe benefit costs ($1.7 million), increased travel and entertainment expenses ($1.1 million) and higher warehousing costs due to customer requirements ($0.8 million).

 

Corporate overhead for the year ended December 31, 2007, increased $4.4 million, or 8.7%, from the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to higher salary, incentive and related benefit expenses ($2.8 million) and increased information technology infrastructure costs ($1.2 million).

 

Other expense, net, decreased $0.5 million, or 5.5% for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The decrease was primarily due to a $0.8 million gain on the sale of land in the third quarter and other individually insignificant items.

 

Interest Expense, Net and Income Taxes

 

Interest expense, net of interest income, decreased by $5.6 million, or 18.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006, primarily as a result of increased income earned on PCA’s cash equivalents due to higher cash balances.

 

PCA’s effective tax rate was 36.5% for the year ended December 31, 2007 and 35.8% for the year ended December 31, 2006. For both 2007 and 2006, tax rates were higher than the federal statutory rate of 35.0% due principally to state income taxes.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

 

 

Operating Activities

 

Net cash provided by operating activities decreased $30.8 million, or 10.3% to $269.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The decrease in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of lower net income in 2008 of $34.5 million as previously described, partially offset by lower requirements for operating assets and liabilities of $1.5 million. During 2008, PCA’s cash taxes paid for both federal and state income taxes were $89.4 million, or 42.5% of book income before taxes of $210.1 million, compared to PCA’s effective tax rate of 35.5% in 2008.

 

The lower requirements for operating assets and liabilities were driven by favorable year over year changes in accounts receivable ($33.7 million) and inventories ($5.9 million) and lower 2008 pension contributions ($12.1 million), partially offset by unfavorable year over year changes in accounts payable ($43.9 million) and accrued liabilities ($10.5 million). The higher pension contributions in 2007 were driven in part by expected additional funding requirements beginning in 2008. Changes in balances of operating assets and liabilities reflected the ordinary course operation of PCA’s business during 2008. Requirements for operating assets and liabilities are subject to PCA’s operating needs, the timing of collection of receivables and the payments of payables and expenses, and to seasonal fluctuations in PCA’s operations. Working capital requirements were affected by the weak business conditions and significantly lower than expected demand for containerboard and corrugated products during the fourth quarter of 2008, resulting in a net increase in the requirements for accounts payable, accrued liabilities and accounts receivable of $32.6 million for the three months ended December 31, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007.

 

Net cash provided by operating activities increased $53.5 million, or 21.7%, to $300.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase in net cash provided by operating activities was primarily the result of higher net income in 2007 as previously described and lower requirements for operating assets and liabilities of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006. During 2007, PCA’s cash taxes paid for both federal and state income taxes were $105.5 million, or 39.4% of book income before taxes of $267.9 million, compared to PCA’s effective tax rate of 36.5% in 2007.

 

Requirements for operating assets and liabilities were lower by $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the same period in 2006, primarily driven by favorable year-over-year changes in accounts receivable ($35.3 million) and accounts payable ($20.6 million), partially offset by unfavorable year-over-year changes in accrued liabilities ($32.6 million), inventories ($5.0 million) and higher 2007 pension contributions ($12.1 million).

 

Investing Activities

 

Net cash used for investing activities increased by $21.3 million, or 18.8%, to $134.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily related to higher additions to property, plant and equipment of $19.5 million and higher additions to other long term assets of $1.4 million in the year ended December 31, 2008 compared to the year ended December 31, 2007.

Net cash used for investing activities increased by $19.2 million, or 20.5%, to $113.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2007 compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily related to higher additions to property, plant and equipment of $25.2 million in 2007 compared to 2006, partially offset by the cost of acquisitions in 2006 of $4.3 million and lower additions to other long term assets of $2.4 million.

 

As of December 31, 2008, PCA had commitments for general purpose capital expenditures of $43.0 million for 2009. PCA believes cash flow from operations will be sufficient to fund these commitments.

 

Financing Activities

 

Net cash used for financing activities totaled $213.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2008, an increase of $92.9 million, or 77.0%, from the year ended December 31, 2007. The increase was primarily attributable to higher debt payments of $160.2 million, higher repurchases of PCA common stock of $35.1 million, $20.0 million in additional dividends paid on PCA’s common stock and lower proceeds from the issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options of $21.9 million during 2008 compared to 2007, partially offset by $145.2 million in net proceeds received from PCA’s notes offering described below.

 

In connection with the senior notes offering in March of 2008, PCA received proceeds, net of discount, of $149.9 million and paid $4.4 million for settlement of a treasury lock that it entered into to protect against increases in the ten-year U.S. Treasury rate, which served as a reference in determining the interest rate applicable to the notes. PCA also incurred financing costs in the amount of $0.3 million in connection with the senior notes offering. PCA used the proceeds of this offering, together with cash on hand, to repay all of the $150.0 million of outstanding 43/8% senior notes that were due on August 1, 2008.

 

Net cash used for financing activities totaled $120.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2007, an increase of $17.1 million, or 16.6%, from the year ended December 31, 2006. The increase was primarily attributable to $30.5 million in repurchases of PCA common stock in 2007, partially offset by additional proceeds from the issuance of common stock upon exercise of stock options of $14.4 million during 2007 compared to 2006.

 

PCA holds an approximate 29% equity ownership interest in STV. PCA did not receive any dividends from STV in 2008, 2007 or 2006.

 

On November 29, 2000, PCA established an on-balance sheet securitization program for its trade accounts receivable. To effectuate this program, PCA formed a wholly-owned limited purpose subsidiary, Packaging Credit Company, LLC, or PCC, which in turn formed a wholly-owned, bankruptcy-remote, special-purpose subsidiary, Packaging Receivables Company, LLC, or PRC, for the purpose of acquiring receivables from PCC. Both of these entities are included in the consolidated financial statements of PCA. Under this program, PCC purchases on an ongoing basis substantially all of the receivables of PCA and sells such receivables to PRC. PRC and lenders established a $150.0 million receivables-backed revolving credit facility through which PRC obtains funds to purchase receivables from PCC. The receivables purchased by PRC are and will be solely the property of PRC. In the event of a liquidation of PRC, the creditors of PRC would be entitled to satisfy their claims from PRC’s assets prior to any distribution to PCC or PCA. Credit available under the receivables credit facility is on a borrowing-base formula. As a result, the full amount of the facility may not be available at all times. On September 19, 2008, PCA extended its receivables credit facility through September 18, 2009. As of December 31, 2008, $109.0 million was outstanding and $41.0 million was available for additional borrowing under the receivables credit facility. The highest outstanding principal balance under the receivables credit facility during fiscal 2008 was $109.0 million.

 

On July 21, 2003, PCA closed its offering and private placement of $150.0 million of 43/8% senior notes due August 1, 2008 and $400.0 million of 53/4% senior notes due August 1, 2013. On March 25, 2008, PCA issued $150.0 million of 61/2% senior notes due March 15, 2018 through a registered public offering. The proceeds of this offering, together with cash on hand, were used to repay all of the $150.0 million of 43/8% senior notes which matured on August 1, 2008.

On March 31, 2008, PCA repaid all borrowings under its old senior credit facility. This facility was replaced with a senior credit facility that provides a new $150.0 million revolving credit facility, including a $35.0 million subfacility for letters of credit. The new senior credit facility closed on April 15, 2008. The new revolving credit facility is available to fund PCA’s working capital requirements, capital expenditures and other general corporate purposes. The new revolving credit facility will terminate in April 2013. As of December 31, 2008, PCA had $130.6 million in unused borrowing capacity under the senior credit facility, net of the impact on this borrowing capacity of $19.4 million of outstanding letters of credit.

 

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

 

The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements as of December 31, 2008 that would require disclosure under SEC FR-67, “Disclosure in Management’s Discussion and Analysis About Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements and Aggregate Contractual Obligations.”

 

Contractual Obligations

 

The following table summarizes PCA’s contractual obligations at December 31, 2008:

 

 

The above table excludes unamortized debt discount of $1.6 million at December 31, 2008 and interest payments on debt outstanding. Based on interest rates in effect and long-term debt balances outstanding as of December 31, 2008, projected contractual interest payments would be approximately $36.0 million in 2009 and for each future year. For the purpose of this disclosure, PCA’s variable and fixed rate long-term debt would be replaced at maturity with similar long-term debt and similar interest rates. This disclosure does not attempt to predict changes in interest rates. See Item 7A. “Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk” for the impact of changes in interest rates on PCA’s future cash flows.

 

The operating lease commitments, capital commitments, purchase commitments and letters of credit are not reflected on PCA’s consolidated balance sheet as of December 31, 2008. See Notes 8 and 12 to the audited consolidated financial statements for additional information. PCA currently does not have any projections for future pension contributions beyond 2009.

 

As of December 31, 2008, the Company’s expected payment for significant contractual obligations excludes $10.4 million of obligations for unrecognized tax benefits because the Company cannot make a reasonably reliable estimate of the period of cash settlement for such liability. See Note 14 to the audited consolidated financial statements for additional information.

 

PCA’s primary sources of liquidity are net cash provided by operating activities, borrowings under PCA’s revolving credit facility and additional borrowings under PCA’s receivables credit facility. As of December 31, 2008, PCA had $171.6 million in unused borrowing capacity under its existing credit facilities, net of the

impact on this borrowing capacity of $19.4 million of outstanding letters of credit. Currently, PCA’s primary uses of cash are for capital expenditures, debt service and declared common stock dividends, which it expects to be able to fund from these sources.

 

The following table provides the outstanding balances and the weighted average interest rates as of December 31, 2008 for PCA’s revolving credit facility, the receivables credit facility and the senior notes:

 

 

The above table excludes unamortized debt discount of $1.6 million at December 31, 2008. It also excludes from the projected annual cash interest payments, the non-cash income from the annual amortization of the $22.8 million received in July 2003 and the non-cash expense from the annual amortization of the $4.4 million paid in March 2008 to settle the treasury locks related to the 53/4% senior notes due 2013 and the 61/2% senior notes due 2018. The amortization is being recognized over the terms of the 53/4% senior notes due 2013 and the 61/2% senior notes due 2018 and is included in interest expense, net.

 

The instruments governing PCA’s indebtedness contain financial and other covenants that limit, among other things, the ability of PCA and its subsidiaries to:

 

 

These limitations could limit corporate and operating activities.

 

In addition, we must maintain minimum net worth and maximum debt to total capitalization and minimum interest coverage ratios under the revolving credit facility. A failure to comply with the restrictions contained in our revolving credit facility could lead to an event of default, which could result in an acceleration of any outstanding indebtedness and/or prohibit us from drawing on the revolving credit facility. Such a default may also constitute an event of default under the senior notes indentures and the receivables credit facility. At December 31, 2008, PCA was in compliance with these covenants.

 

PCA currently expects to incur capital expenditures of $90.0 million in 2009. These expenditures will be used primarily for maintenance capital, cost reduction, business growth and environmental compliance.

 

PCA believes that net cash generated from operating activities, available cash reserves and available borrowings under its committed credit facilities and available capital through access to capital markets will be adequate to meet its liquidity and capital requirements, including payments of any declared common stock dividends, for the foreseeable future. As its debt or credit facilities become due, PCA will need to repay, extend or replace such facilities, which will be subject to future economic conditions and financial, business and other factors, many of which are beyond PCA’s control.

Environmental Matters

 

We are subject to, and must comply with, a variety of federal, state and local environmental laws, particularly those relating to air and water quality, waste disposal and the cleanup of contaminated soil and groundwater. The most significant of these laws affecting us are:

 

 

We believe that we are currently in material compliance with these and all applicable environmental rules and regulations. Because environmental regulations are constantly evolving, we have incurred, and will continue to incur, costs to maintain compliance with these and other environmental laws. We work diligently to anticipate and budget for the impact of applicable environmental regulations, and do not currently expect that future environmental compliance obligations will materially affect our business or financial condition. For the year ended December 31, 2008, we spent approximately $23.5 million to comply with the requirements of these and other environmental laws. For the years ended December 31, 2007 and 2006, the costs of environmental compliance were approximately $19.4 million and $17.5 million, respectively.

 

In addition, the Cluster Rules govern allowable discharges of air and water pollutants at all pulp and paper mill operations, including those at the Counce, Filer City, Valdosta and Tomahawk mills. We have completed all of our projects to ensure compliance with the Cluster Rules and as of this filing, we believe that it is not reasonably possible that future expenditures related to Cluster Rule compliance will have a material impact on our financial condition and results of operations.

 

As is the case with any industrial operation, we have, in the past, incurred costs associated with the remediation of soil or groundwater contamination, as required by the federal Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act, commonly known as the federal “Superfund” law, and analogous state laws. Cleanup requirements arise with respect to properties we currently own or operate, former facilities and off-site facilities where we have disposed of hazardous substances. Under the terms of the contribution agreement, Pactiv has agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with pre-closing off-site waste disposal. Pactiv has also retained environmentally impaired real property in Filer City, Michigan unrelated to current mill operations.

 

Because liability for remediation costs under environmental laws is strict, meaning that liability is imposed without fault, joint and several, meaning that liability is imposed on each party without regard to contribution, and retroactive, we could receive notifications of cleanup liability in the future and this liability could be material. From 1994 through 2008, remediation costs at our mills and corrugated plants totaled approximately $3.2 million. As of December 31, 2008, we maintained an environmental reserve of $8.3 million relating to on-site landfills and surface impoundments as well as ongoing and anticipated remedial projects. Total capital costs for environmental matters were $3.5 million for 2008 and we currently estimate 2009 environmental capital expenditures will be $1.5 million. As of this filing, we believe that it is not reasonably possible that future environmental expenditures above the $8.3 million accrued as of December 31, 2008 will have a material impact on our financial condition, results of operations and cash flows.

 

Critical Accounting Policies

 

Management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these financial statements requires us to make estimates and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses,

and related disclosures of contingent assets and liabilities. On an ongoing basis, we evaluate our estimates, including those related to bad debts, inventories, goodwill and intangible assets, pensions and other postretirement benefits, income taxes, environmental liabilities, stock based compensation, and contingencies and litigation. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

 

We believe the following critical accounting policies affect our more significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of our consolidated financial statements. For a further discussion on the application of these and other accounting policies, see Note 2 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

 

Accounts Receivable — Allowance for Doubtful Accounts and Customer Deductions

 

We evaluate the collectibility of our accounts receivable based upon a combination of factors. In circumstances where we are aware of a specific customer’s inability to meet its financial obligations to us (e.g., bankruptcy filings, substantial downgrading of credit sources), we record a specific reserve for bad debts against amounts due to us to reduce the net recorded receivable to the amount we reasonably believe will be collected. For all other customers, we recognize reserves for bad debts consisting of 0.3% for amounts less than 90 days past due their contractual terms and 30% for amounts more than 90 days past due their contractual terms based on our historical collection experience. If our collection experience deteriorates (i.e., higher than expected defaults or an unexpected material adverse change in a major customer’s ability to meet its financial obligations to us), our estimates of the recoverability of amounts due us could be reduced by a material amount.

 

The customer deductions reserve represents the estimated amount required for customer returns, allowances and earned discounts. Based on our experience, customer returns, allowances and earned discounts have averaged 1.0% of our gross selling price. Accordingly, we reserve 1.0% of our open customer accounts receivable balance for these items.

 

As of December 31, 2008, the balance in the allowance for doubtful accounts reserve was $4.4 million, compared to $2.9 million at December 31, 2007. Bad debt expense in 2008 was $4.2 million, compared to $0.1 million in 2007. The increase in bad debt expense of $4.1 million was primarily attributable to a $2.7 million increase in expense related to customers who had filed for bankruptcy and an increase of $1.1 million reserved for specific customers at the 90% level of their accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2008. For the year ended December 31, 2007, bad debt expense was $0.1 million compared to $3.2 million in 2006. The decrease of $3.1 million was primarily attributable to a $1.8 million decrease in expense related to customers who had filed for bankruptcy and a decrease of $0.9 million in connection with specific customers that were reserved for at the 90% level of their accounts receivable balance as of December 31, 2007.

 

Inventories

 

We record our inventories at the lower of cost or market and include all costs directly associated with manufacturing products: materials, labor and manufacturing overhead. The estimated market value is based on assumptions for future demand and related pricing. If actual market conditions are less favorable than those projected by management, reductions in the carrying value of inventories may be required. Raw materials, work in process and finished goods valued using the last-in, first-out (“LIFO”) cost method comprised 64% of inventories at current cost at both December 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Supplies and materials inventories are valued using a moving average cost.

 

Pension and Postretirement Benefits

 

The Company accounts for defined benefit pension plans and postretirement plans in accordance with SFAS No. 87, “Employers’ Accounting for Pensions,” SFAS No. 106, “Employers’ Accounting for

Postretirement Benefits Other than Pensions” and SFAS No. 158, “Employers’ Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans — An Amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106 and 132(R).”

 

One of the principal assumptions used to calculate net periodic pension cost is the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets. The expected long-term rate of return on plan assets may result in recognized returns that are greater or less than the actual returns on those plan assets in any given year. Over time, however, the expected long-term rate of return on plan assets is designed to approximate the actual long term returns.

 

The discount rate assumptions used to calculate net periodic pension and postretirement costs reflect the rates available on high-quality, fixed-income debt instruments on December 31. The rate of compensation increase is another significant assumption used to calculate net periodic pension cost and is determined by us based upon annual reviews.

 

For postretirement health care plan accounting, we review external data and our own historical trends for health care costs to determine the health care cost trend rate assumption.

 

Environmental Liabilities

 

PCA accounts for its retirement obligations related to its landfills under SFAS No. 143, “Accounting for Asset Retirement Obligations,” which requires legal obligations associated with the retirement of long-lived assets to be recognized at their fair value at the time that the obligations are incurred. Upon initial recognition of a liability, that cost is capitalized as part of the related long-lived asset and amortized to expense over the useful life of the asset.

 

The potential costs for various environmental matters are uncertain due to such factors as the unknown magnitude of possible cleanup costs, the complexity and evolving nature of governmental laws and regulations and their interpretations, and the timing, varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup technologies. Liabilities recorded for environmental contingencies are estimates of the probable costs based upon available information and assumptions. Because of these uncertainties, however, our estimates may change. We believe that any additional costs identified as further information becomes available would not have a material effect on our financial statements.

 

In connection with the sale to PCA of the containerboard and corrugated products business of Pactiv Corporation in April 1999, Pactiv agreed to retain all liability for all former facilities and all sites associated with off-site waste disposal prior to April 12, 1999. Pactiv also retained the environmental liability for a closed landfill located near the Filer City mill.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

PCA recognizes revenue as title to the products is transferred to customers. Shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales. Shipping and handling billings to a customer are included in net sales. In addition, PCA offers volume rebates to certain of its customers. The total cost of these programs is estimated and accrued as a reduction to net sales at the time of the respective sale.

 

Impairment of Goodwill and Long-Lived Assets

 

Goodwill is tested for impairment annually in the fourth quarter or sooner if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount may exceed fair value. Recoverability of goodwill is determined by comparing the fair value of the reporting unit with its carrying value, including goodwill. If the carrying amount of the reporting unit exceeds the fair value, the implied fair value of the reporting unit’s goodwill is compared to the carrying amount of its goodwill to determine if a write-down to fair value is necessary.

 

Long-lived assets other than goodwill are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any long-lived asset may not be fully recoverable. In the event that facts and circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of any long-lived assets may be impaired,

an evaluation of recoverability would be performed. If an evaluation were required, the estimated future undiscounted cash flows associated with the asset (or group of assets) would be compared to the asset’s (or group of assets’) carrying amount to determine if a write-down to fair value is required.

 

Stock-Based Compensation

 

PCA measures and records stock-based compensation cost in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R), “Share-Based Payment.” Stock compensation cost includes: (a) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted prior to, but not vested as of January 1, 2006, the effective date of SFAS No. 123(R), based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the original provisions of SFAS No. 123, and (b) compensation cost for all share-based payments granted subsequent to January 1, 2006, based on the grant date fair value estimated in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 123(R).

 

PCA recognizes compensation expense associated with option awards ratably over their vesting periods. The Company uses the Black-Scholes-Merton option-pricing model to estimate the fair value of each option grant as of the date of grant. Expected volatilities are based on historical volatility of the Company’s common stock. The expected life of the option is estimated using historical data pertaining to option exercises and employee terminations. Separate groups of employees that have similar historical exercise behavior are considered separately for estimating the expected life. The risk-free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury yields in effect at the time of grant.

 

The fair value of restricted stock awards is determined based on the closing price of PCA’s common stock on the grant date. The Company generally recognizes compensation expense associated with restricted stock awards ratably over their vesting periods. As PCA’s Board of Directors has the ability to accelerate the vesting of restricted stock upon an employee’s retirement, the Company accelerates the recognition of compensation expense for certain employees approaching normal retirement age.

 

Income Taxes

 

PCA’s annual tax rate is determined based on income, statutory tax rates and the tax impacts of items treated differently for tax purposes than for financial reporting purposes. Tax law requires some items to be included in the tax return at different times than the items reflected in the financial statements. As a result, the annual tax rate in the financial statements is different than the rate reported on PCA’s tax return. Some of these differences are permanent, such as expenses that are not deductible in the tax return, and some differences are temporary, reversing over time, such as depreciation expense. These temporary differences create deferred tax assets and liabilities.

 

Inherent in determining the annual tax rate are judgments regarding business plans, planning opportunities and expectations about future outcomes. Significant management judgments are required for the following items:

 

 

 

PCA is exposed to the impact of interest rate changes and changes in the market value of its financial instruments. PCA periodically enters into derivatives in order to minimize these risks, but not for trading purposes. On January 17, 2008, in connection with a contemplated issuance of ten-year debt securities in March 2008, PCA entered into an interest rate protection agreement with a counterparty to lock in the then current interest rate on ten-year U.S. Treasury notes to protect against increases in the ten-year U.S. Treasury note rate. This rate served as a reference in determining the interest rate applicable to the ten-year notes due 2018 issued in March 2008. As a result of a decrease in the interest rate on the ten-year U.S. Treasury notes between the date of the agreement and the time PCA priced its offering of those notes, PCA paid $4.4 million to the counterparty on March 25, 2008, the date of settlement. As of December 31, 2008, PCA was not a party to any derivative instruments.

 

The interest rates on approximately 84% of PCA’s debt are fixed. A one percent increase in interest rates related to variable rate debt would have resulted in an increase in interest expense and a corresponding decrease in income before taxes of $1.1 million annually. In the event of a change in interest rates, management could take actions to mitigate its exposure to the change. However, due to the uncertainty of the specific actions that would be taken and their possible effects, the sensitivity analysis assumes no changes in PCA’s financial structure.

 

 

The response to this item is included in a separate section of this report beginning on page F-1, which is incorporated by reference herein.

 

 

None.

 

 

Controls and Procedures

 

PCA maintains disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed in PCA’s filings under the Securities Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the periods specified in the rules and forms of the SEC and that such information is accumulated and communicated to PCA’s management, including its Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

 

Prior to filing this report, PCA completed an evaluation under the supervision and with the participation of PCA’s management, including PCA’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of PCA’s disclosure controls and procedures as of December 31, 2008. The evaluation of PCA’s disclosure controls and procedures included a review of the controls’ objectives and design, PCA’s implementation of the controls and the effect of the controls on the information generated for use in this report. Based on this evaluation, PCA’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that PCA’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2008.

 

During the quarter ended December 31, 2008, there were no changes in internal controls over financial reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, PCA’s internal control over financial reporting.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

 

PCA’s management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f). Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. Internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the Company’s assets; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only with proper authorizations; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the Company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, PCA’s internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. A control system, no matter how well conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and procedures may deteriorate.

 

PCA’s management, under the supervision of and with the participation of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria for effective control over financial reporting described in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this assessment, PCA’s management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2008, based on the specified criteria.

 

Ernst & Young LLP, the independent registered public accounting firm that audited PCA’s financial statements included in this Form 10-K, has also audited the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Their attestation report precedes PCA’s audited financial statements included elsewhere in this report.

 

Because this Annual Report on Form 10-K is being filed within four business days after the applicable triggering event, the below disclosure is being made under Part II, Item 9B of this Annual Report on Form 10-K instead of under Item 5.02 (Departure of Directors or Certain Officers; Election of Directors; Appointment of Certain Officers; Compensatory Arrangements of Certain Officers) of Form 8-K.

 

On February 25, 2009, PCA’s board of directors approved an amendment to the Deferred Compensation Plan that is filed as Exhibit 10.15 to this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The amended plan provides Paul T. Stecko with a monthly deferred compensation benefit and will replace Mr. Stecko’s Supplemental Executive Retirement Plan (the “SERP”) (filed as Exhibit A to Exhibit 10.14 hereto and amendment filed as Exhibit 10.17 hereto) effective March 15, 2009, on which date Mr. Stecko’s benefits under the SERP terminate and are paid out.

 

 

Information regarding PCA’s executive officers required by this Item 10 is set forth in Item 4.1 of Part I of this report.

The following information required by this Item 10 will be included in PCA’s Proxy Statement for the 2009 Annual Meeting of Stockholders and is incorporated by reference herein:

 

 

 

Information with respect to executive compensation required by this Item 11 will be included in PCA’s Proxy Statement under the captions “Compensation Discussion and Analysis” and “Executive Officer and Director Compensation” (including all subcaptions and tables thereunder) and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

Information with respect to security ownership of certain beneficial owners and management required by this Item 12 will be included in PCA’s Proxy Statement under the caption “Ownership of Our Stock” and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Authorization of Securities under Equity Compensation Plans.  Securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation plans at December 31, 2008 are as follows:

 

 

 

 

 

Information with respect to certain relationships and related transactions and director independence required by this Item 13 will be included in PCA’s Proxy Statement under the captions “Transactions with Related Persons” and “Election of Directors — Determination of Director Independence,” respectively, and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Information with respect to fees and services of the principal accountant required by this Item 14 will be included in PCA’s Proxy Statement under the caption “Ratification of Appointment of the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm — Fees to the Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” and is incorporated herein by reference.

 

 

(a) The following documents are filed as a part of this report:

 

(1) The financial statements listed in the “Index to Financial Statements.”

 

(2) Financial Statement Schedule.

 

The following consolidated financial statement schedule of PCA for the years ended December 31, 2008, 2007 and 2006 is included in this report.

 

Schedule II — Packaging Corporation of America — Valuation and Qualifying Accounts.

 

 

 

 

All other schedules for which provision is made in the applicable accounting regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission are not required under the related instructions, are inapplicable or not material, or the information called for thereby is otherwise included in the financial statements or the accompanying notes to the financial statements and therefore, have been omitted.

 

 

 

 

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized on February 27, 2009.

 

Packaging Corporation of America

 

Name:     Paul T. Stecko

 

Name:     Richard B. West

Officer

 

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities indicated on February 27, 2009.

 

 

 

Packaging Corporation of America

Board of Directors and Stockholders

 

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Packaging Corporation of America (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008. Our audits also included the financial statement schedule listed in the index at Item 15(a). These financial statements and schedule are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements and schedule based on our audits.

 

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Packaging Corporation of America at December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles. Also, in our opinion, the related financial statement schedule, when considered in relation to the basic financial statements taken as a whole, presents fairly, in all material respects, the information set forth therein.

 

As discussed in Note 6 to the financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for pension and postretirement benefits effective December 31, 2008, and as discussed in Note 14 to the financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for uncertainty in income taxes effective January 1, 2007.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), Packaging Corporation of America’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission and our report dated February 16, 2009 expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

Ernst & Young LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

February16, 2009

 

Packaging Corporation of America

Board of Directors and Stockholders

 

We have audited Packaging Corporation of America’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on criteria established in Internal Control — Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (the COSO criteria). Packaging Corporation of America’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting included in Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

 

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, evaluating management’s assessment, testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control, and performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

 

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

 

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

 

In our opinion, Packaging Corporation of America maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2008, based on the COSO criteria.

 

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of Packaging Corporation of America as of December 31, 2008 and 2007, and the related consolidated statements of income, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2008, and our report dated February 16, 2009, expressed an unqualified opinion thereon.

 

Ernst & Young LLP

 

Chicago, Illinois

February 16, 2009

Packaging Corporation of America

 

Consolidated Balance Sheets

As of December 31, 2008 and 2007

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Packaging Corporation of America

 

Consolidated Statements of Income

 

 

See notes to consolidated financial statements.

Packaging Corporation of America

 

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity

For the Period January 1, 2006 through December 31, 2008