PAR TECHNOLOGY CORP - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D. C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the Quarter Ended March 31, 2010.
OR
o TRANSITION REPORT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
Commission File Number 1-9720
For the Transition Period From __________ to __________
Commission File Number __________
PAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
16-1434688
|
|
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
(I.R.S. Employer Identification Number)
|
|
PAR Technology Park
|
||
8383 Seneca Turnpike
|
||
New Hartford, New York
|
13413-4991
|
|
(Address of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip Code)
|
Registrant's telephone number, including area code: (315) 738-0600
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its Corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Large Accelerated Filer o
|
Accelerated Filer x
|
Non Accelerated Filer o
|
Smaller Reporting Company o
|
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o No x
The number of shares outstanding of registrant’s common stock, as of April 30, 2010 - 14,901,166 shares.
PAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
FORM 10-Q
PART I
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item Number
|
Page
|
|||
Item 1.
|
Financial Statements (unaudited)
|
|||
1
|
||||
the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
||||
2
|
||||
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
||||
3
|
||||
March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
|
||||
4
|
||||
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
|
||||
5
|
||||
Item 2.
|
11
|
|||
Item 3.
|
18
|
|||
Item 4.
|
19
|
|||
PART II
|
||||
OTHER INFORMATION
|
||||
Item 1A.
|
19
|
|||
Item 4.
|
19
|
|||
Item 5.
|
19
|
|||
Item 6.
|
20
|
|||
Signatures
|
21
|
|||
Exhibit Index
|
22
|
PART I – FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1. Financial Statements
PAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(in thousands, except per share amounts)
(unaudited)
For the three months
ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Net revenues:
|
||||||||
Product
|
$ | 21,251 | $ | 20,237 | ||||
Service
|
19,239 | 19,981 | ||||||
Contract
|
17,629 | 20,250 | ||||||
58,119 | 60,468 | |||||||
Costs of sales:
|
||||||||
Product
|
14,385 | 13,068 | ||||||
Service
|
13,048 | 14,477 | ||||||
Contract
|
16,595 | 19,236 | ||||||
44,028 | 46,781 | |||||||
Gross margin
|
14,091 | 13,687 | ||||||
Operating expenses:
|
||||||||
Selling, general and administrative
|
9,540 | 9,595 | ||||||
Research and development
|
3,445 | 3,309 | ||||||
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets
|
234 | 365 | ||||||
13,219 | 13,269 | |||||||
Operating income
|
872 | 418 | ||||||
Other income, net
|
141 | 107 | ||||||
Interest expense
|
(71 | ) | (139 | ) | ||||
Income before provision for income taxes
|
942 | 386 | ||||||
Provision for income taxes
|
(360 | ) | (139 | ) | ||||
Net income
|
$ | 582 | $ | 247 | ||||
Earnings per share
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | .04 | $ | .02 | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | .04 | $ | .02 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding
|
||||||||
Basic
|
14,702 | 14,473 | ||||||
Diluted
|
14,958 | 14,721 |
See notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
1
PAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
For the three months
ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Net income
|
$ | 582 | $ | 247 | ||||
Other comprehensive loss, net of tax:
|
||||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments
|
(66 | ) | (278 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive income (loss)
|
$ | 516 | $ | (31 | ) |
See notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
2
PAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share amounts)
(unaudited)
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Assets
Current assets:
|
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents
|
$ | 5,522 | $ | 3,907 | ||||
Accounts receivable-net
|
42,373 | 46,107 | ||||||
Inventories-net
|
33,104 | 32,867 | ||||||
Income tax refunds
|
408 | 438 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
6,238 | 6,362 | ||||||
Other current assets
|
3,865 | 3,235 | ||||||
Total current assets
|
91,510 | 92,916 | ||||||
Property, plant and equipment - net
|
6,231 | 6,332 | ||||||
Deferred income taxes
|
1,203 | 1,202 | ||||||
Goodwill
|
26,827 | 26,635 | ||||||
Intangible assets - net
|
8,794 | 7,243 | ||||||
Other assets
|
1,896 | 1,775 | ||||||
Total Assets
|
$ | 136,461 | $ | 136,103 | ||||
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current liabilities:
|
||||||||
Current portion of long-term debt
|
$ | 1,481 | $ | 1,404 | ||||
Borrowings under lines of credit
|
|
2,000 | ||||||
Accounts payable
|
13,900 | 12,942 | ||||||
Accrued salaries and benefits
|
7,658 | 7,607 | ||||||
Accrued expenses
|
5,020 | 3,868 | ||||||
Customer deposits
|
1,702 | 1,782 | ||||||
Deferred service revenue
|
16,298 | 16,598 | ||||||
Total current liabilities
|
46,059 | 46,201 | ||||||
Long-term debt
|
4,046 | 4,455 | ||||||
Other long-term liabilities
|
2,386 | 2,212 | ||||||
Shareholders’ Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred stock, $.02 par value,
|
||||||||
1,000,000 shares authorized
|
─
|
─
|
||||||
Common stock, $.02 par value,
|
||||||||
29,000,000 shares authorized;
|
||||||||
16,522,321 and 16,449,695 shares issued;
|
||||||||
14,869,566 and 14,796,940 outstanding
|
330 | 329 | ||||||
Capital in excess of par value
|
41,600 | 41,382 | ||||||
Retained earnings
|
48,064 | 47,482 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
(515 | ) | (449 | ) | ||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 1,652,755 shares
|
(5,509 | ) | (5,509 | ) | ||||
Total shareholders’ equity
|
83,970 | 83,235 | ||||||
Total Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
$ | 136,461 | $ | 136,103 |
See notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
3
PAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(in thousands)
(unaudited)
For the three months ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net income
|
$ | 582 | $ | 247 | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization
|
849 | 1,045 | ||||||
Provision for bad debts
|
323 | 531 | ||||||
Provision for obsolete inventory
|
225 | 487 | ||||||
Equity based compensation
|
(19 | ) | 267 | |||||
Deferred income tax
|
123 | 130 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable
|
3,303 | 8,921 | ||||||
Inventories
|
(485 | ) | (3,057 | ) | ||||
Income tax refunds
|
30 | (14 | ) | |||||
Other current assets
|
(633 | ) | 483 | |||||
Other assets
|
(97 | ) | 140 | |||||
Accounts payable
|
980 | (2,291 | ) | |||||
Accrued salaries and benefits
|
54 | (1,345 | ) | |||||
Accrued expenses
|
1,206 | (874 | ) | |||||
Customer deposits
|
(80 | ) | (3,614 | ) | ||||
Deferred service revenue
|
(289 | ) | (158 | ) | ||||
Other long-term liabilities
|
174 | (160 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
6,246 | 738 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Capital expenditures
|
(2,146 | ) | (294 | ) | ||||
Capitalization of software costs
|
(128 | ) | (206 | ) | ||||
Contingent purchase price paid on prior year acquisitions
|
(33 | ) | (54 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities
|
(2,307 | ) | (554 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Net repayments under line-of-credit agreements
|
(2,000 | ) | (1,100 | ) | ||||
Payments of long-term debt
|
(332 | ) | (267 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from the exercise of stock options
|
238 | 1 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities
|
(2,094 | ) | (1,366 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
(230 | ) | (323 | ) | ||||
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents
|
1,615 | (1,505 | ) | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
3,907 | 6,227 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 5,522 | $ | 4,722 | ||||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 95 | $ | 160 | ||||
Income taxes, net of refunds
|
29 | 222 |
See notes to unaudited interim consolidated financial statements
4
PAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1.
|
The accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by PAR Technology Corporation (the “Company” or “PAR”) in accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial statements and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Regulation S-X pertaining to interim financial statements. Accordingly, these interim financial statements do not include all information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of the Company, such unaudited statements include all adjustments (which comprise only normal recurring accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the results for such periods. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2010 are not necessarily indicative of the results of operations to be expected for any future period. The consolidated financial statements and notes thereto should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes for the year ended December 31, 2009 included in the Company’s December 31, 2009 Annual Report to the Securities and Exchange Commission on Form 10-K.
|
The preparation of consolidated financial statements requires management of the Company to make a number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the period. Significant items subject to such estimates and assumptions include: the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, identifiable intangible assets and goodwill, equity based compensation, and valuation allowances for receivables, inventories and deferred income taxes. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
The current economic conditions and the continued volatility in the financial markets both in the U.S and in many other countries where the Company operates, have contributed and may continue to contribute to higher unemployment levels, decreased consumer spending, reduced credit availability and/or declining business and consumer confidence. Such conditions could have an impact on consumer purchases and/or retail customer purchases of the Company’s products, which could result in a reduction of sales, operating income and cash flows. This could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition and/or results of operations. Additionally, disruptions in the credit and other financial markets and economic conditions could, among other things, impair the financial condition of one or more of the Company’s customers or suppliers, thereby increasing the risk of customer bad debts or non-performance by suppliers.
Certain amounts for prior periods have been reclassified to conform to the current period classification.
5
2.
|
The Company’s net accounts receivable consist of:
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Government segment:
|
||||||||
Billed
|
$ | 11,788 | $ | 13,898 | ||||
Advanced billings
|
(1,317 | ) | (572 | ) | ||||
10,471 | 13,326 | |||||||
Hospitality segment:
|
||||||||
Accounts receivable - net
|
30,268 | 31,730 | ||||||
Other
|
1,634 | 1,051 | ||||||
$ | 42,373 | $ | 46,107 |
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had recorded allowances for doubtful accounts of $1,554,000 and $1,621,000, respectively, primarily against Hospitality accounts receivable.
3.
|
Inventories are primarily used in the manufacture and service of Hospitality products. The components of inventory, net of related reserves, consist of the following:
|
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Finished Goods
|
$ | 8,959 | $ | 8,314 | ||||
Work in process
|
1,897 | 1,462 | ||||||
Component parts
|
6,228 | 7,029 | ||||||
Service parts
|
16,020 | 16,062 | ||||||
$ | 33,104 | $ | 32,867 |
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the Company had recorded reserves for shrinkage, excess and obsolete inventory of $8,738,000 and $8,801,000, respectively.
4.
|
The Company applies the fair value recognition provisions of ASC Topic 718 Stock-Based Compensation. Total compensation benefit included as a reduction of operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $19,000 which was recorded as a result of forfeitures of unvested stock options prior to completion of the requisite service period. This benefit was derived based on an expense reversal of $139,000, partially offset by current period expense of $120,000. Total compensation expense included in operating expenses for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $267,000. At March 31, 2010, the unrecognized compensation expense related to non-vested equity awards was $682,000 (net of estimated forfeitures) which is expected to be recognized as compensation expense in fiscal years 2010 through 2015.
|
5.
|
Earnings per share is calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 260, which specifies the computation, presentation and disclosure requirements for earnings per share (EPS). It requires the presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS excludes all dilution and is based upon the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the potential dilution that would occur if securities or other contracts to issue common stock were exercised or converted into common stock.
|
6
The following is a reconciliation of the weighted average shares outstanding for the basic and diluted EPS computations (in thousands, except per share data):
For the three months
ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Net income
|
$ | 582 | $ | 247 | ||||
Basic:
|
||||||||
Shares outstanding at beginning of period
|
14,677 | 14,471 | ||||||
Weighted average shares issued during the period
|
25 | 2 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares, basic
|
14,702 | 14,473 | ||||||
Earnings per common share, basic
|
$ | .04 | $ | .02 | ||||
Diluted:
|
||||||||
Weighted average common shares, basic
|
14,702 | 14,473 | ||||||
Dilutive impact of stock options and restricted stock awards
|
256 | 248 | ||||||
Weighted average common shares, diluted
|
14,958 | 14,721 | ||||||
Earnings per common share, diluted
|
$ | .04 | $ | .02 |
6.
|
The Company utilizes the fair value provisions of ASC Topic 820 Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures. ASC Topic 820 describes a fair value hierarchy based upon three levels of input, which are:
|
Level 1 − quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities (observable)
Level 2 − inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities, quoted prices in inactive markets, or other inputs that are observable market data for essentially the full term of the asset or liability (observable)
Level 3 − unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity, but are significant to determining the fair value of the asset or liability (unobservable)
The Company’s interest rate swap agreement is valued at the amount the Company would have expected to pay to terminate the agreement. The fair value determination is based upon the present value of expected future cash flows using the LIBOR rate, plus an applicable interest rate spread, a technique classified within Level 2 of the valuation hierarchy described above. At March 31, 2010, the fair value of the Company’s interest rate swap included a realized loss of $222,000, and is included as a component of accrued expenses within the Consolidated Balance Sheet. The associated fair value adjustments for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were $21,000 and $22,000, respectively and are included as decreases to interest expense.
7
7.
|
The Company’s reportable segments are strategic business units that have separate management teams and infrastructures that offer different products and services.
|
The Company has two reportable segments, Hospitality and Government. The Hospitality segment offers integrated solutions to the hospitality industry. These offerings include industry leading hardware and software applications utilized in point-of-sale, back of store and corporate office applications as well as in the hotel/resort/spa marketplace. This segment also offers customer support including field service, installation, twenty-four hour telephone support and depot repair. The Government segment provides technical expertise in the development of advanced technology prototype systems primarily for the Department of Defense and other Governmental agencies. It provides services for operating and maintaining certain U.S. Government-owned communication and test sites, and for planning, executing and evaluating experiments involving new or advanced radar systems. Intersegment sales and transfers are not significant.
8
Information as to the Company’s segments is set forth below:
(in thousands)
For the three months
ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Net revenues:
|
||||||||
Hospitality
|
$ | 39,519 | $ | 37,802 | ||||
Government
|
17,629 | 20,250 | ||||||
Other
|
971 | 2,416 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 58,119 | $ | 60,468 | ||||
Operating income (loss):
|
||||||||
Hospitality
|
$ | 517 | $ | (396 | ) | |||
Government
|
879 | 938 | ||||||
Other
|
(524 | ) | (124 | ) | ||||
872 | 418 | |||||||
Other income, net
|
141 | 107 | ||||||
Interest expense
|
(71 | ) | (139 | ) | ||||
Income before provision
|
||||||||
for income taxes
|
$ | 942 | $ | 386 | ||||
Depreciation and amortization:
|
||||||||
Hospitality
|
$ | 721 | $ | 952 | ||||
Government
|
21 | 20 | ||||||
Other
|
107 | 73 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 849 | $ | 1,045 | ||||
Capital expenditures:
|
||||||||
Hospitality
|
$ | 2,040 | $ | 187 | ||||
Government
|
42 | 31 | ||||||
Other
|
64 | 76 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 2,146 | $ | 294 | ||||
Revenues by geographic area:
|
||||||||
United States
|
$ | 52,517 | $ | 54,853 | ||||
Other Countries
|
5,602 | 5,615 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 58,119 | $ | 60,468 |
9
Table of Contents
The following table represents identifiable assets by business segment:
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Identifiable assets:
|
||||||||
Hospitality
|
$ | 115,034 | $ | 109,085 | ||||
Government
|
12,129 | 15,097 | ||||||
Other
|
9,298 | 11,921 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 136,461 | $ | 136,103 |
The following table represents identifiable assets by geographic area based on the location of the assets:
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
United States
|
$ | 128,190 | $ | 128,665 | ||||
Other Countries
|
8,271 | 7,438 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 136,461 | $ | 136,103 |
The following table represents Goodwill by business segment:
(in thousands)
|
||||||||
March 31,
|
December 31,
|
|||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Hospitality
|
$ | 26,091 | $ | 25,899 | ||||
Government
|
736 | 736 | ||||||
Total
|
$ | 26,827 | $ | 26,635 |
Customers comprising 10% or more of the Company’s total revenues are summarized as follows:
For the Three Months Ended March 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Hospitality segment:
|
||||||||
McDonald’s Corporation
|
33 | % | 25 | % | ||||
Yum! Brands, Inc.
|
10 | % | 11 | % | ||||
Government segment:
|
||||||||
U.S. Department of Defense
|
30 | % | 33 | % | ||||
All Others
|
27 | % | 31 | % | ||||
100 | % | 100 | % |
10
Item 2: Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Forward-Looking Statement
This document contains “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Any statements in this document that do not describe historical facts are forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this document (including forward-looking statements regarding the continued health of the Hospitality industry, future information technology outsourcing opportunities, changes in contract funding by the U.S. Government, the impact of current world events on our results of operations, the effects of inflation on our margins, and the effects of interest rate and foreign currency fluctuations on our results of operations) are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. When we use words such as “intend,” “anticipate,” “believe,” “estimate,” “plan,” “will,” or “expect”, we are making forward-looking statements. We believe that the assumptions and expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, based on information available to us on the date hereof, but we cannot assure you that these assumptions and expectations will prove to have been correct or that we will take any action that we presently may be planning. We have disclosed certain important factors that could cause our actual future results to differ materially from our current expectations, including a decline in the volume of purchases made by one or a group of our major customers; risks in technology development and commercialization; risks of downturns in economic conditions generally, and in the quick-service sector of the hospitality market specifically; risks associated with government contracts; risks associated with competition and competitive pricing pressures; and risks related to foreign operations. Forward-looking statements made in connection with this report are necessarily qualified by these factors. We are not undertaking to update or revise publicly any forward-looking statements if we obtain new information or upon the occurrence of future events or otherwise.
Overview
PAR Technology is a leading provider of hospitality technology solutions that includes software, hardware and professional/lifecycle support services to several industries including: restaurants, hotels/resorts/spas, cruise lines, movie theaters and specialty retailers. In addition, the Company provides applied technology and technical outsourcing services primarily to the U.S. Department of Defense. PAR also provides best of breed technical tracking systems that focus upon cold chain shipping and logistics for road, rail, and transit markets by providing advanced integrated solutions for all types of refrigerated and dry assets.
11
The Company’s hospitality technology products are used in a variety of applications by thousands of customers. PAR faces competition in all of its markets (restaurants, hotels, spas, etc.) and competes primarily on the basis of product design, features, functions, product quality, reliability, price, customer service and deployment capability. The most recent trend in the hospitality industry has been to reduce the number of approved vendors in a specific concept to companies that have global capabilities and reach in sales, service and deployment, can achieve quality and delivery standards, have multiple product offerings, R&D capability, and can be competitive with their pricing. The Company’s international scope as a technology provider to hospitality customers is a strategic competitive advantage as the Company provides innovative solutions, with significant world-wide reach to its multinational customers such as McDonald’s, Yum! Brands, Subway, CKE Restaurants and the Mandarin Oriental Hotel Group. PAR’s focus is to provide completely integrated technology products and services with industry leading customer service in the market segments in which it competes. The Company continually initiates new research and development efforts to create innovative technology to meet our customers’ requirements and also has high probability for broader market appeal and success. PAR’s business focuses upon operating efficiencies and controlling costs.
The current economic conditions and the continued volatility in the financial markets both in the U.S. and in many other countries where the Company operates, have contributed and may continue to contribute to higher unemployment levels, decreased consumer spending, reduced credit availability and/or declining business and consumer confidence. These factors could also have a material adverse impact on the Company's significant estimates, specifically the fair value of the Company's reporting units used in support of its annual goodwill impairment test.
The Company has consistently determined the fair value of its reporting units using primarily a discounted cash flow method, which is based on certain assumptions such as projected operating results, growth rates and discount rates. The Company completed its annual impairment test in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2009 and concluded that no impairment existed. The Company reevaluated the assumptions utilized in its annual impairment test and determined them to remain appropriate based on the Company’s actual results achieved to date as well as communication it has received from its customers relative to their planned capital investments. There were no indicators of impairment during the three months ended March 31, 2010 so the Company did not perform an impairment review of goodwill during the quarter.
In regards to the current economic conditions, the QSR market continues to be strong for the large international companies, however, the Company has seen an impact on the regional QSR organizations whose business is slowing because of higher unemployment and lack of consumer confidence in specific domestic regions. These smaller businesses are also struggling to access affordable capital in the tight credit markets. Such conditions have had and could continue to have an impact on the markets in which the Company's customers operate, which could result in a reduction of sales, operating income and cash flows. However, even with the difficult environment, the Company remains optimistic about its prospects for recovery. The Company is currently supporting one of its large international customers as they execute an aggressive upgrade to their in-store technology. In addition the Company is observing an improvement in the pipeline of business with its second tier customers.
The Company is currently focusing upon enhancing three distinct areas of its Hospitality segment. First, PAR has been investing in its development of next generation software for both their restaurant and hotel/resort businesses. Second, the Company is building a highly capable and further reaching distribution channel. Third, as the Company’s customers continue their expansion into international markets, PAR is creating a global infrastructure, initially focusing on the Asia/Pacific rim due to the new restaurant growth and concentration of PAR’s customers in that region, but also one that will enhance our deployment and support globally.
12
Approximately 30% of the Company’s revenues are generated in our Government segment. PAR provides IT and communications support services to the U.S. Navy, Air Force and Army. The Company also offers its services to several non-military U.S. federal, state and local agencies by providing applied technology services including radar, image and signal processing and geospatial services and products. The performance rating of PAR’s Government segment translates into consistently winning add-on and renewal business and building long-term client-vendor relationships. PAR provides its clients the technical expertise necessary to operate and maintain complex technology systems utilized by government agencies.
PAR’s logistics management business continues to win new accounts. During this past year, the Company announced several new contracts including KLLM Transport Services, CR England and Hapag-Lloyd AG. In the first quarter of 2010 PAR announced Golden State Foods (GSF) as a new customer for their cold chain technology. GSF is a large food service provider to large restaurant chains. PAR continues to expand its customer base in the cold chain and dry van markets. As the market continues to recognize the value proposition associated with the real time use of location and environmental information in both asset management and cargo quality assurance, the Company believes it is well positioned in this emerging market.
The Company will continue to leverage its core technical capabilities and performance into related technical areas and an expanding customer base. PAR will seek to accelerate this growth through strategic acquisitions of businesses that broaden the Company’s technology and/or business base.
Summary
The Company believes it is and can continue to be successful in its three businesses, Hospitality, Government I/T Services and Logistics Management Systems; due to its capabilities and industry expertise. The majority of the Company’s business is in the quick-serve restaurant sector of the hospitality market. In regards to the current economic landscape, PAR believes that the quick-serve restaurant sector will remain strong, a direct reflection of the value and convenience PAR’s large quick-service customers provide. The Company continues to execute upon operational initiatives and certain organizational changes that it expects will deliver meaningful cost savings and believes that its fundamental long-term strategy remains intact.
It has been the Company’s experience that their Government I/T business is resistant to economic cycles. Clearly, PAR’s I/T outsourcing business focuses on cost-effective operations of technology and telecommunication facilities which must function independent of economic cycles. Additionally, it is the Company’s experience that its Government research and development spending has only fluctuated modestly during times of military cutbacks.
Lastly, the Company’s Logistics Management business continues to win new accounts as the transportation market continues to adopt the Company’s cold chain technology.
13
Results of Operations —
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 Compared to Three Months Ended March 31, 2009
The Company reported revenues of $58.1 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of 4% from the $60.5 million reported for the quarter ended March 31, 2009. The Company’s net income for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 was $582,000, or $0.04 earnings per diluted share, compared to net income of $247,000 and $0.02 earnings per diluted share for the same period in 2009.
Product revenues were $21.3 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, an increase of 5% from the $20.2 million recorded in 2009. This increase was primarily due to sales associated with the start of a technology upgrade program with a major customer, partially offset by a large initial sale to a specific restaurant customer and a certain logistics customer in 2009 that did not recur in 2010.
Customer service revenue primarily includes installation, software maintenance, training, twenty-four hour help desk support and various depot and on-site service options. Customer service revenues were $19.2 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, a 4% decrease from the $20 million reported for the same period in 2009. This decrease is primarily due to a decline in installation and field service revenue as a result of the completion of a specific initiative with a major customer in 2009, partially offset by an increase in service revenue associated with the Company’s Logistics Management business.
Contract revenues were $17.6 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, a decrease of 13% when compared to the $20.2 million for the same period in 2009. This decrease was primarily due to a reduction in pass through revenue that occurred in 2009 that did not recur in 2010 associated with a specific contract.
Product margins for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 were 32.3%, a decline from 35.4% for the same period in 2009. This decrease in margins was mostly due to a shift in product mix as a result of a decrease in software revenue in 2010 when compared to 2009.
Customer service margins were 32.2% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared to 27.5% for the same period in 2009. Service margins increased primarily due to more favorable margin installation services as well as through cost reductions executed across several service areas.
14
Contract margins were 5.9% for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared to 5% for the same period in 2009. This increase was due to a reduction in low margin pass through revenue that occurred in 2009 associated with a specific contract that did not recur in 2010. The most significant components of contract costs in 2010 and 2009 were labor and fringe benefits. For 2010, labor and fringe benefits were $13.1 million or 79% of contract costs compared to $13.6 million or 71% of contract costs for the same period in 2009.
Selling, general and administrative expenses for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 were $9.5 million, a decrease of 1% from the $9.6 million for the same period in 2009. This change was the result of a reduction in bad debt expense and stock based compensation expense, offset by an increase in marketing expense associated with the Company’s Restaurant business, as well as an increase in expense associated with the Company’s Logistics Management business.
Research and development expenses were $3.4 million for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, an increase of 4% from the $3.3 million for the same period in 2009. The increase was the result of increased research and development expenditures in support of the Company’s luxury hotel, resort and spa software business as well as the continued investment in its Logistics Management business, partially offset by cost reductions achieved in outsourcing through strategic relationships.
Amortization of identifiable intangible assets was $234,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010, compared to $365,000 for the same period in 2009. This decrease was due to certain intangible assets becoming fully amortized in 2009.
Other income, net, was $141,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to $107,000 for the same period in 2009. Other income primarily includes rental income, income from the sale of certain assets and foreign currency gains and losses. The increase is primarily due to a gain on sale of certain assets.
Interest expense represents interest charged on the Company’s short-term borrowing requirements from banks and from long-term debt. Interest expense was $71,000 for the quarter ended March 31, 2010 as compared to $139,000 for the same period in 2009. The decrease is primarily due to lower borrowings and a lower average borrowing rate in 2010 compared to 2009.
For the quarters ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company’s expected effective income tax rate based on projected pre-tax income was 38.2% and 36.0%, respectively. The variance from the federal statutory rate in 2010 is primarily due to state income taxes. The variance from the federal statutory rate in 2009 was primarily due to state income taxes and various nondeductible expenses partially offset by the research and experimental tax credit.
15
Liquidity and Capital Resources
The Company’s primary sources of liquidity have been cash flow from operations and its bank line of credit. Cash provided by operations was $6.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to $738,000 for the same period in 2009. In 2010, cash was generated primarily by collections of accounts receivable and an increase in accrued expenses. In 2009, cash was generated by collection of accounts receivable partially offset by an increase in inventory and decreases in accounts payable and customer deposits.
Cash used in investing activities was $2.3 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 versus $554,000 for the same period in 2009. In 2010, capital expenditures were $2.1 million and were primarily related to the Company’s acquisition of certain technology components to compliment its next generation enterprise solution for its Restaurant business. Capitalized software costs relating to software development of Hospitality segment products were $128,000. In 2009, capital expenditures were $294,000 and were primarily for manufacturing, office and computer equipment. Capitalized software costs relating to software development of Hospitality segment products were $206,000 in 2009.
Cash used in financing activities was $2.1 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010 versus $1.4 million in 2009. In 2010, the Company decreased its short-term borrowings by $2 million, decreased its long-term debt by $332,000 and also benefited $238,000 from the exercise of employee stock options. In 2009, the Company decreased its short-term borrowings by $1.1 million and decreased its long-term debt by $267,000.
The Company has a credit agreement with a bank under which the Company has a borrowing availability up to $20 million in the form of a line of credit. This agreement allows the Company, at its option, to borrow funds at the LIBOR rate plus the applicable interest rate spread (1.73% at March 31, 2010) or at the bank’s prime lending rate plus the applicable interest rate spread (3.25% at March 31, 2010). This agreement expires in June 2011. At March 31, 2010, the Company did not have any borrowings outstanding under this agreement. The weighted average interest rate paid by the Company was 2.1% during the first quarter of 2010. This agreement contains certain loan covenants including leverage and fixed charge coverage ratios. The Company is in compliance with these covenants at March 31, 2010. This credit facility is secured by certain assets of the Company.
The Company borrowed $6 million under an unsecured term loan agreement, executed as an amendment to one of its then bank line of credit agreements, in connection with a prior business acquisition. The loan provides for interest only payments in the first year and escalating principal payments through 2012. The loan bears interest at the LIBOR rate plus the applicable interest rate spread (1.73% at March 31, 2010) or at the bank’s prime lending rate plus the applicable interest rate spread (3.25% at March 31, 2010). The terms and conditions of the line of credit agreement described in the preceding paragraph also apply to the term loan.
16
The Company entered into an interest rate swap agreement associated with the above $6 million loan, with principal and interest payments due through August 2012. At March 31, 2010, the notional principal amount totaled $3.9 million. This instrument was utilized by the Company to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings and cash flows caused by interest rate volatility. The Company did not adopt hedge accounting, but rather records the fair market value adjustments through the consolidated statements of operations each period. The associated fair value adjustment for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $21,000 and is included as a decrease to interest expense.
The Company has a $1.6 million mortgage, collateralized by certain real estate. The annual mortgage payment including interest totals $222,000. The mortgage bears interest at a fixed rate of 5.75% and matures in 2019.
During fiscal year 2010, the Company anticipates that its capital requirements will be approximately $3 to $4 million. The Company does not enter into long term contracts with its major Hospitality segment customers. The Company commits to purchasing inventory from its suppliers based on a combination of internal forecasts and the actual orders from customers. This process, along with good relations with suppliers, minimizes the working capital investment required by the Company. Although the Company lists two major customers, McDonald’s and Yum! Brands, it sells to hundreds of individual franchisees of these corporations, each of which is individually responsible for its own debts. These broadly made sales substantially reduce the impact on the Company’s liquidity if one individual franchisee reduces the volume of its purchases from the Company in a given year. The Company, based on internal forecasts, believes its existing cash, line of credit facilities and its anticipated operating cash flow will be sufficient to meet its cash requirements through at least the next twelve months. However, the Company may be required, or could elect, to seek additional funding prior to that time. The Company’s future capital requirements will depend on many factors including its rate of revenue growth, the timing and extent of spending to support product development efforts, expansion of sales and marketing, the timing of introductions of new products and enhancements to existing products, and market acceptance of its products. The Company cannot assure that additional equity or debt financing will be available on acceptable terms or at all. The Company’s sources of liquidity beyond twelve months, in management’s opinion, will be its cash balances on hand at that time, funds provided by operations, funds available through its lines of credit and the long-term credit facilities that it can arrange.
17
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In January 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2010-6, “Improving Disclosures about Fair Value Measurements,” which requires interim disclosures regarding significant transfers in and out of Level 1 and Level 2 fair value measurements. Additionally, this ASU requires disclosure for each class of assets and liabilities and disclosures about the valuation techniques and inputs used to measure fair value for both recurring and non-recurring fair value measurements. These disclosures are required for fair value measurements that fall in either Level 2 or Level 3. Further, the ASU requires separate presentation of Level 3 activity for the fair value measurements. The Company adopted the provisions of this standard on January 1, 2010, which did not have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
Critical Accounting Policies
In our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009, we disclose accounting policies, referred to as critical accounting policies, that require management to use significant judgment or that require significant estimates. Management regularly reviews the selection and application of our critical accounting policies. There have been no updates to the critical accounting policies contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
inflation
Inflation had little effect on revenues and related costs during the first three months of 2010. Management anticipates that margins will be maintained at acceptable levels to minimize the affects of inflation, if any.
interest rates
As of March 31, 2010, the Company has $3.9 million in variable debt. The Company believes that an adverse change in interest rates of 100 basis points would not have a material impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.
foreign currency
The Company’s primary exposures relate to certain non-dollar denominated sales and operating expenses in Europe and Asia. These primary currencies are the Euro, the Australian dollar and the Singapore dollar. Management believes that foreign currency fluctuations should not have a significant impact on our business, financial conditions, and results of operations or cash flows due to the low volume of business affected by foreign currencies.
18
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
|
(a)
|
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures.
|
Based on an evaluation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934) as of March 31, 2010, the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q (the “Evaluation Date”), conducted under the supervision of and with the participation of the Company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer, such officers have concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, which are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to management including the chief executive and financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosures, are effective as of the Evaluation Date.
|
(b)
|
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting.
|
There was no change in the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) of the Exchange Act during the quarter ended March 31, 2010 that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, such internal controls over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A. Risk Factors
The Company is exposed to certain risk factors that may effect operations and/or financial results. The significant factors known to the Company are described in the Company’s most recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K. There have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Item 4. Reserved
Item 5. Other Information
On February 12, 2010, PAR Technology Corporation furnished a report on Form 8-K pursuant to Item 2.02 (Results of Operations and Financial Condition) of that Form relating to its financial information for the quarter ended December 31, 2009, as presented in the press release of February 12, 2010 and furnished thereto as an exhibit.
19
Item 6. Exhibits
List of Exhibits
Exhibit No.
|
Description of Instrument
|
31.1
|
Certification of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
31.2
|
Certification of Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
32.1
|
Certification of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as Adopted Pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
20
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PAR TECHNOLOGY CORPORATION
|
||
(Registrant)
|
||
Date: May 10, 2010
|
||
/s/RONALD J. CASCIANO
|
||
Ronald J. Casciano
|
||
Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Chief Accounting Officer
|
21
Exhibit
|
Sequential Page Number
|
|
|
Certification of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
E-1
|
|
Certification of Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
E-2
|
|
Certification of Chairman of the Board and Chief Executive Officer and Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Treasurer, and Chief Accounting Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
E-3
|
22