PARK AEROSPACE CORP - Quarter Report: 2009 May (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 14(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended May 31, 2009
OR
o
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the
transition period from ________ to__________
Commission
file number 1-4415
PARK
ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
New
York
|
11-1734643
|
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
Identification
No.)
|
|
48 South Service Road, Melville,
N.Y.
|
11747
|
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(631) 465-3600
(Registrant's
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Not Applicable
(Former
Name, Former Address and Former Fiscal Year,
if
Changed Since Last Report)
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or
15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports),
and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
x No
o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if
any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes
o No
o
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See
definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
Accelerated Filer o Accelerated
Filer x Non-Accelerated
Filer o Smaller
Reporting Company o
Indicate by check mark whether the
registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act). Yes o No
x
Indicate the number of shares
outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest
practicable date: 20,540,690 as of July 7, 2009.
PARK
ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF
CONTENTS
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION:
|
Page
Number
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets May
31, 2009 (Unaudited) and March 1, 2009
|
3
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Operations 13
weeks ended May 31, 2009 and June 1, 2008 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Stockholders’ Equity 13
weeks ended May 31, 2009 and June 1, 2008 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
||
Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows 13
weeks ended May 31, 2009 and June 1, 2008 (Unaudited)
|
6
|
||
Notes
to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
7
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
14
|
|
Factors
That May Affect Future Results
|
22
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
22
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION:
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
24
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
24
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
24
|
|
|
|||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
24
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
24
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
25
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
25
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
26
|
||
EXHIBIT
INDEX
|
27
|
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
PARK
ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(Amounts
in thousands)
May
31, 2009
|
March
1,
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
2009*
|
|||||||
ASSETS
|
||||||||
Current
assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 158,410 | $ | 40,790 | ||||
Marketable
securities
|
71,416 | 184,504 | ||||||
Accounts
receivable, net
|
20,920 | 22,433 | ||||||
Inventories
(Note 2)
|
11,210 | 10,677 | ||||||
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets
|
3,454
|
5,527
|
||||||
Total
current assets
|
265,410 | 263,931 | ||||||
Property,
plant and equipment, net
|
47,953 | 48,777 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
14,623 | 14,871 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 327,986 | $ | 327,579 | ||||
LIABILITIES
AND STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ | 7,368 | $ | 8,480 | ||||
Accrued
liabilities
|
10,292 | 11,425 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
5,301 | 4,381 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
22,961 | 24,286 | ||||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
3,926 | 3,927 | ||||||
Restructuring
accruals and other liabilities (Note
4)
|
3,404
|
3,657
|
||||||
Total
liabilities
|
30,291 | 31,870 | ||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Common
stock
|
2,047 | 2,047 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
147,296 | 146,934 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
146,543 | 145,107 | ||||||
Treasury
stock, at cost
|
(1 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
1,810 |
1,622
|
||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
297,695 | 295,709 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$ | 327,986 | 327,579 |
*The
balance sheet at March 1, 2009 has been derived from the audited financial
statements at that date.
See
accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
3
PARK
ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share amounts)
13
weeks ended
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
May 31, 2009
|
June 1, 2008
|
|||||||
Net
sales
|
$ | 36,697 | $ | 59,800 | ||||
Cost
of sales
|
27,489 | 45,227 | ||||||
Gross
profit
|
9,208 | 14,573 | ||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
expenses
|
5,917 | 6,334 | ||||||
Earnings
from operations
|
3,291 | 8,239 | ||||||
Interest
income
|
688 | 1,672 | ||||||
Earnings
from operations before income taxes
|
3,979 | 9,911 | ||||||
Income
tax provision
|
905 | 2,354 | ||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 3,074 | $ | 7,557 | ||||
Earnings
per share (Note 5)
|
||||||||
Basic
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Diluted
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Weighted
average number of common and common equivalent shares
outstanding:
|
||||||||
Basic
shares
|
20,471 | 20,366 | ||||||
Diluted
shares
|
20,482 | 20,430 | ||||||
Dividends
per share
|
$ | 0.08 | $ | 0.08 |
See
accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
4
PARK
ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF STOCKHOLDERS' EQUITY
(Amounts
in thousands)
13
weeks ended
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
May 31, 2009
|
June 1, 2008
|
|||||||
Common
stock and paid-in capital:
|
||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 148,981 | $ | 145,304 | ||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
288 | 352 | ||||||
Stock
option activity
|
74 | 1,601 | ||||||
Tax
benefit on exercise of options
|
-
|
357 | ||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
149,343 | 147,614 | ||||||
Retained
earnings:
|
||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
145,107 | 116,646 | ||||||
Net
earnings
|
3,074 | 7,557 | ||||||
Dividends
|
(1,638 | ) | (1,628 | ) | ||||
Balance,
end of period
|
146,543 | 122,575 | ||||||
Treasury
stock:
|
||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
(1 | ) | (214 | ) | ||||
Stock
option activity
|
- | 209 | ||||||
Balance,
end of period
|
(1 | ) | (5 | ) | ||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income:
|
||||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
1,622 | 7,436 | ||||||
Net
unrealized investment gains
(losses)
|
- | (323 | ) | |||||
Translation
adjustments
|
188 | (701 | ) | |||||
Balance,
end of period
|
1,810 | 6,412 | ||||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
$ | 297,695 | $ | 276,596 |
See
accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
5
PARK
ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(Amounts
in thousands)
13
Weeks Ended
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
May
31,
2009
|
June
1,
2008
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 3,074 | $ | 7,557 | ||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
1,680 | 1,946 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
288 | 352 | ||||||
Change
in operating assets and liabilities
|
1,960 | 1,469 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
7,002 | 11,324 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: | ||||||||
Purchases
of property, plant and equipment,
net
|
(838 | ) | (5,774 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of marketable securities
|
(4,073 | ) | (30,888 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sales and maturities of marketable
securities
|
117,161 | 43,221 | ||||||
Business
acquisition
|
- | (4,700 | ) | |||||
Net
cash provided by investing activities
|
112,250 | 1,859 | ||||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Dividends
paid
|
(1,638 | ) | (1,628 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
74 | 1,807 | ||||||
Tax
benefits from stock-based compensation
|
- | 357 | ||||||
Net
cash (used in) provided by financing activities
|
(1,564 | ) | 536 | |||||
Change
in cash and cash equivalents before exchange
rate changes
|
117,688 | 13,719 | ||||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and
cash equivalents
|
(68 | ) | (348 | ) | ||||
Change
in cash and cash equivalents
|
117,620 | 13,371 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, beginning of period
|
40,790 | 100,159 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents, end of period
|
$ | 158,410 | $ | 113,530 | ||||
Supplemental
cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for income taxes
|
$ | 782 | $ | 1,346 |
See
accompanying Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial
Statements.
6
PARK
ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.
AND
SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
(Amounts
in thousands, except per share and option amounts)
1.
|
CONDENSED
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
The
condensed consolidated balance sheet as of May 31, 2009 and the consolidated
statements of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for the 13 weeks
ended May 31, 2009 have been prepared by the Company, without
audit. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated
financial statements contain all adjustments (which include only normal
recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position at May
31, 2009 and the results of operations, stockholders’ equity and cash flows for
all periods presented.
Certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that
these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the
consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2009.
2.
|
INVENTORIES
|
Inventories
consisted of the following:
May 31, 2009
|
March 1, 2009
|
|||||||
Raw
materials
|
$ | 5,833 | $ | 5,711 | ||||
Work-in-process
|
2,231 | 2,110 | ||||||
Finished
goods
|
2,820 | 2,561 | ||||||
Manufacturing
supplies
|
326 | 295 | ||||||
$ | 11,210 | $ | 10,677 |
3.
|
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
As of May
31, 2009, the Company had a 1992 Stock Option Plan and a 2002 Stock Option Plan,
and no other stock-based compensation plan. Both Stock Option Plans have been
approved by the Company’s stockholders and provide for the grant of stock
options to directors and key employees of the Company. All options granted under
such Plans have exercise prices equal to the fair market value of the underlying
common stock of the Company at the time of grant, which pursuant to the terms of
the Plans, is the reported closing price of the common stock on the New York
Stock Exchange on the date preceding the date the option is granted. Options
granted under the Plans become exercisable 25% one year from the date of grant,
with an additional 25% exercisable each succeeding anniversary of the date of
grant and expire 10 years from the date of grant. The authority to grant
additional options under the 1992 Stock Option Plan expired on March 24, 2002,
and options to purchase a total of 900,000 shares of common stock were
authorized for grant under the 2002 Stock Option Plan. At May 31,
2009, 2,023,501 shares of common stock of the Company were reserved for issuance
upon exercise of stock options under the 1992 Stock Option Plan and the 2002
Stock Option Plan and 1,051,856 options were available for future grant under
the 2002 Stock Option Plan. Options to purchase 4,000 shares of common stock
were granted
7
during
the 13-week period ended May 31, 2009, and no options were granted during the
13-week period ended June 1, 2008.
The
Company records its stock-based compensation at fair value in accordance with
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 123 (revised 2004), “Share-Based
Payment” (“SFAS 123R”).
The
weighted average fair value for options was estimated at the date of grant using
the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to be $4.43 for the first 13 weeks of
fiscal year 2010, with the following assumptions: risk free interest rate of
2.75%; expected volatility factor of 32.1%; expected dividend yield of 1.98%;
and estimated option term of 5.4 years.
The risk
free interest rate is based on U.S. Treasury rates at the date of grant with
maturity dates approximately equal to the estimated term of the options at the
date of the grant. Volatility is based on historical volatility of the Company’s
common stock. The expected dividend yield is based on the regular cash dividends
per share paid by the Company in the 2009 fiscal year and on the exercise price
of the options granted during the 13 weeks ended May 31, 2009. The estimated
term of the options is based on evaluations of historical and expected future
employee exercise behavior.
The
future compensation expense affecting earnings from operations before income
taxes for options outstanding at May 31, 2009 will be $1,756.
The
following is a summary of options for the 13 weeks ended May 31,
2009:
Options
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise
Price
|
Weighted
Average
Remaining
Contract
Life
in
Months
|
Aggregated
Intrinsic
Value
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at March 1, 2009
|
982,727 | $ | 24.35 |
66.38
|
$
-0-
|
|||||||||||
Granted
|
4,000 | 16.15 | ||||||||||||||
Exercised
|
4,500 | 16.54 | ||||||||||||||
Terminated
or expired
|
10,582 | 26.93 | ||||||||||||||
Outstanding
at May 31, 2009
|
971,645 | $ | 24.38 |
63.63
|
$
-0-
|
|||||||||||
Exercisable
at May 31, 2009
|
636,410 | $ | 22.82 |
44.46
|
$
-0-
|
The total
intrinsic value of options exercised during the 13 weeks ended May 31, 2009 and
June 1, 2008 was $14 and $1,104, respectively.
A summary
of the status of the Company’s nonvested options at May 31, 2009, and changes
during the 13 weeks then ended, is presented below:
Shares
Subject
to Options
|
Weighted
Average
Grant
Date Fair
Value
|
|||||||
Nonvested,
beginning of period
|
337,985 | $ | 7.16 | |||||
Granted
|
4,000 | 16.15 | ||||||
Vested
|
- | - | ||||||
Terminated
|
(6,750 | ) | 6.33 | |||||
Nonvested,
end of period
|
335,235 | $ | 7.08 |
8
4.
|
RESTRUCTURING
AND SEVERANCE CHARGES
|
In the
2009 fiscal year fourth quarter, the Company recorded one-time pre-tax charges
of $5,688 related to the closure of the Company’s New England Laminates Co.,
Inc. electronic materials business unit located in Newburgh, New York and the
closures of the Company’s Neltec Europe SAS electronic materials business unit
located in Mirebeau, France and related to an asset impairment and workforce
reduction at the Company’s Nelco Products Pte. Ltd. electronic materials and
advanced composite materials business unit in Singapore. The charges for the
closure of the business units included a non-cash asset impairment charge of
$650 and were net of the recapture of non-cash cumulative currency translation
adjustments of $3,957. In the 2009 fiscal year third quarter, the Company
recorded a pre-tax charge of $570 related to restructurings at certain of its
North American and European business units. The Company paid $3,045
of these charges during the 2009 fiscal year and $1,137 during the 13 weeks
ended May 31, 2009 and expects to pay the remaining $1,416 during the 2010
fiscal year.
During
the 2004 fiscal year, the Company recorded charges related to the realignment of
its North America volume printed circuit materials operations. The charges were
for employment termination benefits of $1,258, which were fully paid in fiscal
year 2004, and lease and other obligations of $7,292. All costs other
than the lease obligations were settled prior to fiscal year 2007. The future
lease obligations are payable through September 2013. The remaining balances on
the lease obligations relating to the realignment were $2,963 and $3,209 as of
May 31, 2009 and March 1, 2009, respectively. The Company applied $246 and $109
of payments against this liability during the first quarter of fiscal year 2010
and the first quarter of fiscal year 2009, respectively.
5.
|
EARNINGS
PER SHARE
|
Basic
earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average
number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings
per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the sum of (a) the weighted
average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and (b)
the potential common stock equivalents outstanding during the period. Stock
options are the only common stock equivalents, and the number of dilutive
options is computed using the treasury stock method.
The
following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per
share for the 13 weeks ended May 31, 2009 and June 1, 2008.
13 weeks ended
|
||||||||
May 31, 2009
|
June 1, 2008
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 3,074 | $ | 7,557 | ||||
Weighted
average common shares outstanding
for basic EPS
|
20,471 | 20,366 | ||||||
Net
effect of dilutive options
|
11
|
64 | ||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
for diluted EPS
|
20,482 | 20,430 | ||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.37 | ||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.15 | $ | 0.37 |
9
Common
stock equivalents, which were not included in the computation of diluted
earnings per share because either the effect would have been antidilutive or the
options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the
common stock, were 339 and 25 for the thirteen weeks ended May 31, 2009 and June
1, 2008, respectively.
6.
|
INCOME
TAXES
|
The
Company adopted the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board
Interpretation No. 48, “Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes — an
Interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109” (“FIN 48”) effective as of February
26, 2007.
The
amount of unrecognized tax benefits may increase or decrease in the future for
various reasons, including adding or reducing amounts for current year tax
positions, expiration of statutes of limitation on open income tax returns,
changes in management’s judgment about the level of uncertainty, status of tax
examinations, and legislative activity.
The
Company’s effective tax rate for the 13-week period ended May 31, 2009 was 22.7%
compared to 23.8% for the 13-week period ended June 1, 2008. The effective rate
varied from the U.S. Federal statutory rate primarily due to foreign income
taxed at lower rates. The Company’s policy is to include applicable interest and
penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as a component of income tax
expense.
7.
|
GEOGRAPHIC
REGIONS
|
The
Company’s printed circuit materials (the Nelco® product line), the Company’s
advanced composite materials (the Nelcote® product line) and the Company’s
composite parts (the Nova™ product line) are sold to customers in North America,
Europe and Asia.
Sales are
attributed to geographic region based upon the region in which the materials
were delivered to the customer. Sales between geographic regions were not
significant.
Financial
information concerning the Company's operations by geographic region
follows:
13 weeks ended
|
||||||||
May
31,
|
June
1,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Sales:
|
||||||||
North
America
|
$ | 19,861 | $ | 30,365 | ||||
Europe
|
3,497 | 7,620 | ||||||
Asia
|
13,339 | 21,815 | ||||||
Total
sales
|
$ | 36,697 | $ | 59,800 |
May
31,
|
June
1,
|
|||||||
2009
|
2008
|
|||||||
Long-lived
assets:
|
||||||||
North
America
|
$ | 40,889 | $ | 31,677 | ||||
Europe
|
1,166 | 5,133 | ||||||
Asia
|
20,521 | 26,073 | ||||||
Total
long-lived assets
|
$ | 62,576 | $ | 62,883 |
10
8.
|
CONTINGENCIES
|
a.
|
Litigation – The
Company is subject to a small number of proceedings, lawsuits and other
claims related to environmental, employment, product and other matters.
The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments
or outcomes in these matters as well as potential ranges of probable
losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for
these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual
issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new
developments in each matter or changes in approach, such as a change in
settlement strategy in dealing with these
matters.
|
b.
|
Environmental
Contingencies - The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have
been named by the Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") or a
comparable state agency under the Comprehensive Environmental Response,
Compensation and Liability Act (the "Superfund Act") or similar state law
as potentially responsible parties in connection with alleged releases of
hazardous substances at eight sites. In addition, two subsidiaries of the
Company have received cost recovery claims under the Superfund Act or
similar state laws from other private parties involving two other sites,
and a subsidiary of the Company has received requests from the EPA under
the Superfund Act for information with respect to its involvement at three
other sites.
|
|
Under
the Superfund Act and similar state laws, all parties who may have
contributed any waste to a hazardous waste disposal site or contaminated
area identified by the EPA or comparable state agency may be jointly and
severally liable for the cost of cleanup. Generally, these sites are
locations at which numerous persons disposed of hazardous waste. In the
case of the Company's subsidiaries, generally the waste was removed
from their manufacturing facilities and disposed at waste sites by various
companies which contracted with the subsidiaries to provide waste disposal
services. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries have been
accused of or charged with any wrongdoing or illegal acts in connection
with any such sites. The Company believes it maintains an effective and
comprehensive environmental compliance
program.
|
|
The
insurance carriers who provided general liability insurance coverage to
the Company and its subsidiaries for the years during which the
Company's subsidiaries' waste was disposed at these sites have agreed to
pay, or reimburse the Company and its subsidiaries for, 100% of their
legal defense and remediation costs associated with three of these sites
and 25% of such costs associated with another one of these
sites.
|
The total
costs incurred by the Company and its subsidiaries in connection with these
sites, including legal fees incurred by the Company and its subsidiaries and
their assessed share of remediation costs and excluding amounts paid or
reimbursed by insurance carriers, were approximately $1 and $1 in the 13 weeks
ended May 31, 2009 and June 1, 2008, respectively. The recorded liabilities
included in accrued liabilities for environmental matters were $844 at May 31,
2009 and $1,002 at June 1, 2008.
|
Such
recorded liabilities do not include environmental liabilities and related
legal expenses for which the Company has concluded indemnification
agreements with the insurance carriers who provided general liability
insurance coverage to the Company and its subsidiaries for the years
during which the Company's subsidiaries' waste was disposed at three sites
for which certain subsidiaries of the Company have been named as
potentially responsible parties, pursuant to which agreements such
insurance carriers have been paying 100% of the
legal
|
11
defense and remediation costs associated with
such three sites since 1985.
|
Included
in cost of sales are charges for actual expenditures and accruals, based
on estimates, for certain environmental matters described above. The
Company accrues estimated costs associated with known environmental
matters, when such costs can be reasonably estimated and when the outcome
appears probable. The Company believes that the ultimate disposition of
known environmental matters will not have a material adverse effect on the
liquidity, capital resources, business or consolidated results of
operations or financial position of the Company. However, one or more of
such environmental matters could have a significant negative impact
on the Company's consolidated results of operations or financial position
for a particular reporting period.
|
c.
|
Acquisition – The
Company is obligated to pay up to an additional $5,500 over five years
depending on the achievement of specified earn-out objectives in
connection with the acquisition by the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary,
Park Aerospace Structures Corp., of substantially all the assets and
business of Nova Composites, Inc., a manufacturer of composite parts and
the tooling for such parts, located in Lynnwood, Washington, in addition
to a cash purchase price of $4,500 paid at the closing of the acquisition
on April 1, 2008. The Company is in the process of determining the
additional amount, if any, up to $1,100, payable for the first year. Any
such additional amount paid will be recorded as
goodwill.
|
9.
|
RECENT
ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
Effective
March 2, 2009, the Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
No. 141R (revised 2007), which replaces Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 141, “Business Combinations” (“SFAS 141R”). SFAS 141R requires an
acquirer, upon initially obtaining control of another entity, to recognize the
assets, liabilities and any non-controlling interest in the acquiree at fair
value as of the acquisition date. This fair value approach replaces the original
Statement 141’s cost allocation process, whereby the cost of an acquisition was
allocated to the individual assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on
their estimated fair value. SFAS 141R requires acquirers to expense
acquisition-related costs as incurred rather than allocating such costs to the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed, as was previously the case under
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 141. SFAS 141R is effective for
fiscal years beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The adoption of SFAS 141R
did not have an impact on the Company’s Consolidated Financial
Statements.
On April
9, 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) issued FSP FAS
No. 107-1 and APB Opinion No. 28-1, “Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments” (”FSP FAS 107-1 and APB Opinion 28-1”), which require
fair value disclosures for all financial instruments whether recognized or not
in the statement of financial position. With the issuance of FSP FAS 107-1 and
APB Opinion 28-1, on a quarterly basis quantitative and qualitative information
will be required to be disclosed about the fair value estimates for all
financial instruments. FSP FAS 107-1 and APB Opinion 28-1 will be effective for
interim reporting periods after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact, if any, that the adoption of FSP FAS 107-1 and APB
Opinion 28-1 will have on its Consolidated Financial Statements.
12
On April
9, 2009, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-4, “Determining Fair Value When the
Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly
Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly” (“FSP FAS 157-4”),
which clarifies the methodology used to determine fair value when there is no
active market or when the price inputs being used represent distressed sales.
FSP FAS 157-4 also reaffirms the objective of fair value measurement, as stated
in SFAS 157, which is to reflect how much an asset would be sold for in an
orderly transaction. It also reaffirms the need to use judgment to determine if
a formerly active market has become inactive, as well as to determine fair
values when markets have become inactive. FSP FAS 157-4 will be applied
prospectively and will be effective for interim and annual reporting periods
ending after June 15, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact, if
any, that the adoption of FSP FAS 157-4 will have on its Consolidated Financial
Statements.
13
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.
|
General:
Park is a
global advanced materials company which develops, manufactures, markets and
sells high technology digital and RF/microwave printed circuit materials
principally for the telecommunications and internet infrastructure and high-end
computing markets and advanced composite materials and parts principally for the
aerospace markets. The Company’s core capabilities are in the areas of polymer
chemistry formulation and coating technology. The Company also specializes in
the manufacture of complex composite aircraft and space vehicle parts. The
Company’s manufacturing facilities are located in Singapore, China, France,
Connecticut, Kansas, Arizona, California and Washington. The Company’s products
are marketed and sold under the Nelco®, Nelcote® and Nova™ names.
The Company's total net sales
declined in the three-month period ended May 31, 2009 compared with last year's
comparable period principally as a result of decreases in sales of the Company’s
printed circuit materials products in North America, Asia and
Europe.
As a
result of the decline in the Company’s total net sales in the 2010 fiscal year
first quarter compared to the 2009 fiscal year first quarter, the Company’s
earnings from operations and net earnings were lower in the 2010 fiscal year
first quarter than in the 2009 fiscal year first quarter. The Company’s net
earnings in the 2010 fiscal year first quarter were also negatively impacted by
the lower interest income earned by the Company in such quarter compared to the
interest income earned by the Company in the 2009 fiscal year first
quarter.
The
significant decreases in sales of printed circuit materials products resulted in
lower gross profits and lower earnings from operations in the 2010 fiscal year
first quarter compared to the 2009 fiscal year first quarter. However, the
Company’s gross profit margin, measured as a percentage of sales, improved to
25.1% in the 2010 fiscal year first quarter compared to 24.4% in the 2009 fiscal
year first quarter and 22.9% in the 2009 fiscal year fourth quarter. The
declines in the Company’s operating and earnings performances during the 2010
fiscal year first quarter compared to the 2009 fiscal year first quarter were
partially offset by higher percentages of sales of higher margin, high
performance printed circuit materials and advanced composite materials and parts
during the 2010 fiscal year first quarter and by the benefits resulting from the
workforce reductions at the Nelco Products, Inc., Neltec, Inc. and Nelco
Products Pte. Ltd. business units and the closures of the New England Laminates
Co., Inc. and Neltec Europe SAS business units in the 2009 fiscal year, all
described elsewhere in this Discussion.
The
markets in North America, Europe and Asia for the Company’s printed circuit
materials products continued to be weak in the 2010 fiscal year first quarter.
The markets for the Company’s advanced composite materials products weakened
during the 2009 fiscal year third and fourth quarters, and such weakness
continued during the 2010 fiscal year first quarter.
The
global markets for the Company’s printed circuit materials products continue to
be very difficult to forecast, and it is not clear to the Company what the
condition of the global markets for the Company’s printed circuit materials
products will be in the 2010 fiscal year second quarter. Further, the Company is
not able to predict the impact the current global economic and financial crises
will have on the markets for its advanced composite materials and parts products
in the 2010 fiscal year second quarter or beyond.
14
As
previously reported, in the first quarter of the Company’s 2009 fiscal year, the
Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Park Aerospace Structures Corp., acquired
substantially all the assets and business of Nova Composites, Inc., a
manufacturer of aircraft composite parts and the tooling for such parts, located
in Lynnwood, Washington, for a cash purchase price of $4.5 million paid at the
closing of the acquisition and up to an additional $5.5 million payable over
five years depending on the achievement of specified earn-out
objectives.
In
addition, in the fourth quarter of the Company’s 2009 fiscal year, the Company
completed the construction of a new development and manufacturing facility in
Newton, Kansas to produce advanced composite materials principally for the
general aviation aircraft segment of the aerospace industry. The Company spent
approximately $15 million on the facility and equipment in Kansas.
While the
Company continues to invest in its business, it also continues to make
additional adjustments to certain of its operations, which have resulted in
workforce reductions and plant closures.
In the
2009 fiscal year fourth quarter, the Company’s Neltec Europe SAS electronic
materials business unit located in Mirebeau, France and its Neltec SA electronic
materials business unit located in Lannemezan, France completed restructurings
of their operations in response to the continuing serious erosion of the markets
for electronic materials in Europe and the continuing migration of such markets
to Asia. The market for such products in Europe had eroded to the point where
the Company believed it was not possible for the Neltec Europe SAS business to
be viable, and as a major component of such restructurings, Neltec Europe SAS
closed completely its operations. Although the Company is continuing the
operations of its Neltec SA RF/microwave electronic materials business unit, the
restructuring included a reorganization of certain of the activities of Neltec
SA.
In
addition to the restructurings of its Neltec Europe SAS and Neltec SA business
units in France, the Company implemented workforce reductions at its Nelco
Products, Inc. electronic materials business unit located in Fullerton,
California and its Neltec, Inc. electronics circuitry materials business unit
located in Tempe, Arizona in the 2009 fiscal year third quarter and a workforce
reduction at its Nelco Products Pte. Ltd. electronics circuitry materials and
advanced composite materials business unit located in Singapore in the 2009
fiscal year fourth quarter.
Also, in
the 2009 fiscal year fourth quarter, the Company’s New England Laminates Co.,
Inc. electronic materials business unit located in Newburgh, New York closed its
operations in response to the very serious erosion of the markets for electronic
materials in North America.
Since the
closures of the Neltec Europe SAS and New England Laminates Co., Inc. business
units, the Company has been supplying and supporting customers of such business
units from the Company’s electronic materials operations in Fullerton,
California and Tempe, Arizona.
Three
Months Ended May 31, 2009 Compared with Three Months Ended June 1,
2008:
The
Company’s total net sales and its net sales of both its printed circuit
materials products and its advanced composite materials products declined during
the three-month period ended May 31, 2009 compared to the three-month period
ended June 1, 2008. Sales of the Company’s advanced composite materials and
parts products were 17% of the Company’s total net sales worldwide in the 2010
fiscal year first quarter compared to 11% in the 2009 fiscal year first quarter
and 9% in the 2008 fiscal year first quarter.
15
The
decreased sales in the three months ended May 31, 2009 resulted in lower
earnings from operations and lower net earnings compared to the three months
ended June 1, 2008.
Results
of Operations
Net sales
for the three-month period ended May 31, 2009 decreased 39% to $36.7 million
from $59.8 million for last fiscal year's comparable period. The decrease in net
sales was principally the result of lower sales of printed circuit materials
products in North America, Europe and Asia. Sales volumes decreased 35% in North
America, 54% in Europe and 39% in Asia during the 2010 fiscal year first quarter
compared to the first quarter in the prior year.
The
Company's foreign sales were $16.8 million, or 46% of the Company's total net
sales worldwide, during the three-month period ended May 31, 2009 compared with
$29.4 million of sales, or 49% of total net sales worldwide, during last fiscal
year's comparable period. The Company's foreign sales during the 2010 fiscal
year first quarter decreased by 43% from the 2009 fiscal year comparable period
as the result of lower sales in Asia and Europe.
For the
three-month period ended May 31, 2009, the Company’s sales in North America,
Asia and Europe were 54%, 36% and 10%, respectively, of the Company’s total net
sales worldwide compared with 51%, 36% and 13%, respectively, for the
three-month period ended June 1, 2008.
The
Company’s gross profit in the three months ended May 31, 2009 was lower than the
gross profit in the prior year’s comparable period primarily as a result of
lower sales and lower production unit volumes. However, the gross profit as a
percentage of sales in the three months ended May 31, 2009 improved to 25.1%
compared to 24.4% in the three months ended June 1, 2008 and 22.9% in the three
months ended March 1, 2009 principally due to a higher percentage of sales of
higher margin, high performance printed circuit materials products and advanced
composite materials and parts and the benefits resulting from the workforce
reductions at the Nelco Products, Inc., Neltec, Inc. and Nelco Products Pte.
Ltd. business units and the closures of the New England Laminates Co., Inc. and
Neltec Europe SAS business units in the 2009 fiscal year, all described
elsewhere in this Discussion.
During
both the three-month periods ended May 31, 2009 and June 1, 2008, the Company’s
total net sales worldwide of high temperature printed circuit materials, which
include high performance materials (non-FR4 printed circuit materials), were
100% of the Company’s total net sales worldwide of printed circuit
materials.
The
Company’s high temperature printed circuit materials include its high
performance materials (non-FR4 printed circuit materials), which consist of
high-speed, low-loss materials for digital and RF/microwave applications
requiring lead-free compatibility and high bandwidth signal integrity,
bismalimide triazine (“BT”) materials, polyimides for applications that demand
extremely high thermal performance, cyanate esters, and polytetrafluoroethylene
(“PTFE”) materials for RF/microwave systems that operate at frequencies up to
77GHz.
During
the three-month period ended May 31, 2009, the Company’s total net sales
worldwide of high performance printed circuit materials (non-FR4 printed circuit
materials) were 67% of the Company’s total net sales worldwide of printed
circuit materials, compared to 60% for last fiscal year’s comparable
period.
16
Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased by $0.4 million, or by 7%, during
the three months ended May 31, 2009 compared with last fiscal year's comparable
period, but these expenses, measured as a percentage of sales, were 16.1% during
the three months ended May 31, 2009 compared with 10.6% during last fiscal
year's comparable period. Stock option expense was $288,000 for the three months
ended May 31, 2009 compared to $352,000 for last year’s comparable
period.
For the
reasons set forth above, the Company's earnings from operations were $3.3
million for the three months ended May 31, 2009, compared to earnings from
operations of $8.2 million for the three months ended June 1, 2008.
Interest
income was $688,000 for the three-month period ended May 31, 2009 compared to
$1,672,000 for last fiscal year's comparable period. The decrease in interest
income was attributable to lower prevailing interest rates during the 2010
fiscal year first quarter than during the 2009 fiscal year first quarter. The
Company's investments were primarily in short-term instruments and money market
funds.
The
Company's effective income tax rate for the three-month period ended May 31,
2009 was 22.7%, compared to 23.8% for last fiscal year's comparable period. The
lower tax provision for the 2010 fiscal year first quarter was attributable
principally to higher taxable income in jurisdictions with lower effective
income tax rates.
The
Company's net earnings for the three months ended May 31, 2009 were $3.1
million, compared to net earnings of $7.6 million for the three months ended
June 1, 2008.
Basic and
diluted earnings per share were $0.15 for the three-month period ended May 31,
2009 and $0.37 for the three-month period ended June 1, 2008.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources:
At May
31, 2009, the Company's cash and marketable securities were $229.8 million
compared with $225.3 million at March 1, 2009, the end of the Company's 2009
fiscal year. The Company's working capital (which includes cash and marketable
securities) was $242.4 million at May 31, 2009 compared with $239.6 million at
March 1, 2009. The increase in working capital at May 31, 2009 compared with
March 1, 2009 was due principally to the increase in cash and marketable
securities, an increase in inventories and decreases in accounts payable and
accrued liabilities slightly offset by decreases in accounts receivable and
prepaid expenses and other current assets and an increase in income taxes
payable. Inventories were 5% higher at May 31, 2009 than at March 1, 2009
primarily as a result of higher work-in-process and finished goods. At May 31,
2009, accounts payable were 13% lower than at March 1, 2009 principally as a
result of lower purchases or raw materials during the period ended May 31, 2009
than during the period ended March 1, 2009, and accrued liabilities were 10%
lower than at March 1, 2009 principally as a result of payments of liabilities
accrued in the 2009 fiscal year in connection with workforce reductions and
plant closings during such year. The 7% decline in accounts receivable at May
31, 2009 compared to March 1, 2009 was primarily the result of shorter average
customer payment terms during the period ended May 31, 2009 compared to the
period ended March 1, 2009. The 38% decrease in prepaid expenses and
other current assets at May 31, 2009 compared to March 1, 2009 was primarily
attributable to the Company’s receipt of an amount due from a foreign taxing
authority in the three months ended May 31, 2009 and lower interest receivable
at such date. Income taxes payable were 21% higher at May 31, 2009 than at March
1, 2009 primarily as a result of recorded tax on income in excess of tax
payments.
17
The
Company's current ratio (the ratio of current assets to current liabilities) was
11.6 to 1 at May 31, 2009 compared to 10.9 to 1 at March 1, 2009.
During
the three months ended May 31, 2009, net earnings from the Company's operations,
before depreciation and amortization, of $5.3 million reduced by a net decrease
in working capital items, resulted in $7.0 million of cash provided by operating
activities. During the same three-month period, the Company expended $0.8
million for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, primarily for the
Company’s new development and manufacturing facility in Newton, Kansas, compared
with $5.8 million for the three-month period ended June 1, 2008, and paid $1.6
million and $1.6 million, respectively, in dividends on its common stock in such
three-month periods. Net expenditures for property, plant and equipment were
$12.2 million in the 2009 fiscal year and $4.4 million in the 2008 fiscal
year.
In the
first quarter of the Company’s 2009 fiscal year, the Company’s wholly owned
subsidiary, Park Aerospace Structures Corp., acquired substantially all the
assets and business of Nova Composites, Inc., a manufacturer of aircraft
composite parts and the tooling for such parts, located in Lynnwood, Washington,
for a cash purchase price of $4.5 million paid at the closing of the acquisition
and up to an additional $5.5 million payable over five years depending on the
achievement of specified earn-out objectives.
During
the 2009 fiscal year, the Company expended approximately $10.2 million for the
construction of its new development and manufacturing facility in Newton, Kansas
to produce advanced composite materials and for equipment for such
facility.
At May
31, 2009 and at June 1, 2008, the Company had no long-term debt.
The
Company believes its financial resources will be sufficient, for the foreseeable
future, to provide for continued investment in working capital and property,
plant and equipment and for general corporate purposes. Such resources would
also be available for purchases of the Company's common stock, appropriate
acquisitions and other expansions of the Company's business.
The
Company is not aware of any circumstances or events that are reasonably likely
to occur that could materially affect its liquidity.
The
Company's contractual obligations and other commercial commitments to make
future payments under contracts, such as lease agreements, consist only of
operating lease commitments, commitments to purchase equipment for the Company’s
new development and manufacturing facility in Newton, Kansas and the Company’s
obligation to pay up to an additional $5.5 million over five years in connection
with the acquisition of the assets and business of Nova Composites, Inc.,
described above. The Company has no long-term debt, capital lease obligations,
unconditional purchase obligations or other long-term obligations, standby
letters of credit, guarantees, standby repurchase obligations or other
commercial commitments or contingent commitments, other than two standby letters
of credit in the total amount of $1.45 million to secure the Company's
obligations under its workers' compensation insurance program.
18
As of May
31, 2009, there were no material changes outside the ordinary course of the
Company’s business in the Company’s contractual obligations disclosed in Item 7
of Part II of its Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended March 1,
2009.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements:
The
Company's liquidity is not dependent on the use of, and the Company is not
engaged in, any off-balance sheet financing arrangements, such as securitization
of receivables or obtaining access to assets through special purpose
entities.
Environmental
Matters:
In the
three-month periods ended May 31, 2009 and June 1, 2008, the Company charged
approximately $0.01 million and $(0.6) million, respectively, against pretax
income for environmental remedial response and voluntary cleanup costs
(including legal fees). While annual expenditures have generally been constant
from year to year and may increase over time, the Company expects it will be
able to fund such expenditures from cash flow from operations. The timing of
expenditures depends on a number of factors, including regulatory approval of
cleanup projects, remedial techniques to be utilized and agreements with other
parties. At May 31, 2009 and March 1, 2009, the amount recorded in accrued
liabilities for environmental matters was $0.8 million.
Management
does not expect that environmental matters will have a material adverse effect
on the liquidity, capital resources, business, consolidated results of
operations or consolidated financial position of the Company.
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates:
In
response to financial reporting release, FR-60, "Cautionary Advice Regarding
Disclosure About Critical Accounting Policies", issued by the Securities and
Exchange Commission in December 2001, the following information is provided
regarding critical accounting policies that are important to the Consolidated
Financial Statements and that entail, to a significant extent, the use of
estimates, assumptions and the application of management's
judgment.
General
The
Company's discussion and analysis of its financial condition and results of
operations are based upon the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, which
have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States. The preparation of these Financial Statements requires the
Company to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported
amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosure
of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its
estimates, including those related to sales allowances, accounts receivable,
allowances for doubtful accounts, inventories, valuation of long-lived assets,
income taxes, restructurings, contingencies and litigation, and pensions and
other employee benefit programs. The Company bases its estimates on historical
experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable
under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making
judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not
readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
19
The
Company believes the following critical accounting policies affect its more
significant judgments and estimates used in the preparation of its consolidated
financial statements.
Revenue
Recognition
Sales
revenue is recognized at the time title to product is transferred to a customer.
All material sales transactions are for the shipment of manufactured prepreg and
laminate products and advanced composite materials. The Company ships its
products to customers based upon firm orders, with fixed selling prices, when
collection is reasonably assured.
Sales
Allowances
The
Company provides for the estimated costs of sales allowances at the time such
costs can be reasonably estimated. The Company’s products are made to customer
specifications and tested for adherence to such specifications before shipment
to customers. There are no future performance requirements other than the
products’ meeting the agreed specifications. The Company’s bases for providing
sales allowances for returns are known situations in which products may have
failed due to manufacturing defects in the products supplied by the Company. The
Company is focused on manufacturing the highest quality printed circuit
materials and advanced composite materials and parts possible and employs
stringent manufacturing process controls and works with raw material suppliers
who have dedicated themselves to complying with the Company’s specifications and
technical requirements. The amounts of returns and allowances resulting from
defective or damaged products have been approximately 1.0% of sales for each of
the Company’s last three fiscal years.
Accounts
Receivable
The
majority of the Company’s accounts receivable are due from purchasers of the
Company’s printed circuit materials. Credit is extended based on
evaluation of a customer’s financial condition and, generally, collateral is not
required. Accounts receivable are due within established payment terms and are
stated at amounts due from customers net of an allowance for doubtful accounts.
Accounts outstanding longer than established payment terms are considered past
due. The Company determines its allowance by considering a number of factors,
including the length of time accounts receivable are past due, the Company’s
previous loss history, the customer’s current ability to pay its obligation to
the Company, and the condition of the general economy and the industry as a
whole. The Company writes off accounts receivable when they become
uncollectible, and payments subsequently received on such receivables are
credited to the allowance for doubtful accounts.
Allowances
for Doubtful Accounts
The
Company maintains allowances for doubtful accounts for estimated losses
resulting from the inability of its customers to make required payments. If the
financial condition of the Company's customers were to deteriorate, resulting in
an impairment of their ability to make payments, additional allowances may be
required.
Inventories
Inventories
are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. The
Company writes down its inventory for estimated obsolescence or unmarketability
based upon the age of the inventory and assumptions about future demand for the
Company's products and market conditions.
20
Valuation
of Long-lived Assets
The
Company assesses the impairment of long-lived assets whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of such assets may not be
recoverable. Important factors that could trigger an impairment review include,
but are not limited to, significant negative industry or economic trends and
significant changes in the use of the Company’s assets or strategy of the
overall business.
Income
Taxes
Carrying
value of the Company's net deferred tax assets assumes that the Company will be
able to generate sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions,
based on estimates and assumptions. If these estimates and assumptions change in
the future, the Company may be required to record additional valuation
allowances against its deferred tax assets resulting in additional income tax
expense in the Company's consolidated statement of operations, or conversely to
further reduce the existing valuation allowance resulting in less income tax
expense. Management evaluates the realizability of the deferred tax assets
quarterly and assesses the need for additional valuation allowances
quarterly.
Restructurings
The
Company recorded one-time pre-tax charges of $5.7 million in the fourth quarter
of the fiscal year ended March 1, 2009 related to the closure of the Company’s
New England Laminates Co., Inc. electronic materials business unit located in
Newburgh, New York and the closures of the Company’s Neltec Europe SAS
electronic materials business unit located in Mirebeau, France and related to a
workforce reduction and an asset impairment at the Company’s Nelco Products Pte.
Ltd. electronic materials and advanced composite materials business unit in
Singapore. In the 2009 fiscal year third quarter, the Company recorded a
one-time pre-tax charge of $0.6 million related to restructurings at certain of
its North American and European business units. The Company recorded a one-time
charge of $1.4 million in the fourth quarter of the fiscal year ended March 2,
2008 in connection with a restructuring and workforce reduction at its Neltec
Europe SAS business unit. Such restructuring and workforce reductions are
described in Note 4 of the Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements
in Item 1 of Part I of this Report and in “Management’s Discussion and Analysis
of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” in Item 2 of Part I of this
Report.
Contingencies
The
Company is subject to a small number of proceedings, lawsuits and other claims
related to environmental, employment, product and other matters. The Company is
required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes in these
matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the
amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after
careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in
the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach, such
as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters.
The
Company is obligated to pay up to an additional $5.5 million over five years
depending on the achievement of specified earn-out objectives in connection with
the acquisition by the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Park Aerospace
Structures Corp., of substantially all the assets and business of Nova
Composites, Inc., a manufacturer of composite parts and the tooling for
21
such
parts, located in Lynnwood, Washington, in addition to a cash purchase price of
$4.5 million paid at the closing of the acquisition on April 1,
2008.
Pension
and Other Employee Benefit Programs
The
Company's obligations for workers' compensation claims are effectively
self-insured, although the Company maintains individual and aggregate stop-loss
insurance coverage for such claims. The Company accrues its workers’
compensation liability based on estimates of the total exposure of known claims
using historical experience and projected loss development factors less amounts
previously paid.
The
Company and certain of its subsidiaries have a non-contributory profit sharing
retirement plan covering their regular full-time employees. In addition, the
Company's subsidiaries have various bonus and incentive compensation programs,
most of which are determined at management's discretion.
The
Company's reserves associated with these self-insured liabilities and benefit
programs are reviewed by management for adequacy at the end of each reporting
period.
Factors That May Affect
Future Results.
Certain
portions of this Report which do not relate to historical financial information
may be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to
various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from
Park's expectations or from results which might be projected, forecast,
estimated or budgeted by the Company in forward-looking statements. Such factors
include, but are not limited to, general conditions in the electronics and
aerospace industries, the Company's competitive position, the status of the
Company's relationships with its customers, economic conditions in international
markets, the cost and availability of raw materials, transportation and
utilities, and the various factors set forth in Item 1A “Risk Factors” and under
the caption "Factors That May Affect Future Results" after Item 7 of Park's
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2009.
Item
3.
|
Quantitative and
Qualitative Disclosure About Market
Risk.
|
The
Company's market risk exposure at May 31, 2009 is consistent with, and not
greater than, the types of market risk and amount of exposures presented in the
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 1, 2009.
Item
4.
|
Controls and
Procedures.
|
|
(a)
|
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures.
|
The
Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive
Officer and Vice President and Controller (the person currently performing the
functions similar to those performed by a principal financial officer), has
evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures
(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of May 31, 2009, the
end of the quarterly fiscal period covered by this quarterly report. Based on
such evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Vice President and
Controller have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company's
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing,
summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act and are effective in ensuring that
22
information
required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits
under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s
management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Vice President
and Controller, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
(b)
|
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting.
|
There has
not been any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting
(as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange
Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that has materially
affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal
control over financial reporting.
23
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings.
|
None.
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors.
|
There
have been no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in
the Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended March 1,
2009.
Item
2.
|
Unregistered Sales of
Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds.
|
The following table provides
information with respect to shares of the Company's Common Stock acquired by the
Company during each month included in the Company’s 2010 fiscal year first
quarter ended May 31, 2009.
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid per Share (or
Unit)
|
Total
Number of Shares (or Units) Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
or Programs
|
Maximum
Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares (or Units) that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
|
||||
March
2-March 31
|
0
|
$ -
|
0
|
|||||
April
1-April 30
|
0
|
−
|
0
|
|||||
May
1-May 31
|
1
|
19.29
|
0
|
|||||
Total
|
1
|
$19.29
|
0
|
2,000,000(a)
|
(a) Aggregate
number of shares available to be purchased by the Company pursuant to a previous
share purchase authorization announced on October 20, 2004. Pursuant to such
authorization, the Company is authorized to purchase its shares from time to
time on the open market or in privately negotiated transactions.
Item
3.
|
Defaults Upon Senior
Securities.
|
None.
Item
4.
|
Submission of Matters
to a Vote of Security
Holders.
|
None.
24
Item
5.
|
Other
Information.
|
None.
Item
6.
|
Exhibits.
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or
15d-14(a).
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or
15d-14(a).
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Park
Electrochemical Corp.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
|
/s/
Brian E.
Shore
|
|
Date: July
8, 2009
|
Brian
E. Shore
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
|
(principal
executive officer)
|
|
/s/ P. Matthew
Farabaugh
|
|
Date: July
8, 2009
|
P.
Matthew Farabaugh
|
Vice
President and Controller
|
|
(principal
accounting officer)
|
26
EXHIBIT
INDEX
Exhibit
No.
|
Name
|
Page
|
31.1
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or
15d-14(a)
|
28
|
31.2
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rule 13a-14(a) or
15d-14(a)
|
30
|
32.1
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as
adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
32
|
32.2
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350,
as
adopted
pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
33
|
27