PARK AEROSPACE CORP - Quarter Report: 2014 August (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)

[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the quarterly period ended August 31, 2014

OR

[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ________ to__________

Commission file number 1-4415

PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP.

(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes [X] No [ ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Large Accelerated Filer ☐ Accelerated Filer ☒ Non-Accelerated Filer ☐ Smaller Reporting Company ☐

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes [ ] No [X]

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: 20,950,442 as of October 6, 2014.

PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION

Item I.     Financial Statements.

PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Amounts in thousands)

*The balance sheet at March 2, 2014 has been derived from the audited financial statements at that date.

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE EARNINGS

(Amounts in thousands)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Amounts in thousands)

See accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited).

PARK ELECTROCHEMICAL CORP. AND SUBSIDIARIES

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

(Amounts in thousands, except per share amounts)

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of August 31, 2014, the consolidated statements of operations and the consolidated statements of comprehensive earnings for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 and September 1, 2013, and the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows for the 26 weeks then ended have been prepared by Park Electrochemical Corp. (the “Company”), without audit. In the opinion of management, these unaudited consolidated financial statements contain all adjustments (which include only normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position at August 31, 2014 and the results of operations and cash flows for all periods presented. The consolidated statements of operations are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full fiscal year or any subsequent interim period.

Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been condensed or omitted. It is suggested that these consolidated financial statements be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 2, 2014. There have been no significant changes to such accounting policies during the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014.

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability (i.e., the “exit price”) in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date.

Fair value measurements are broken down into three levels based on the reliability of inputs as follows:

Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Company has the ability to access at the measurement date. An active market for the asset or liability is a market in which transactions for the asset or liability occur with sufficient frequency and volume to provide pricing information on an ongoing basis.

Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly. Level 2 inputs include quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability (e.g., interest rates and yield curves observable at commonly quoted intervals or current market) and contractual prices for the underlying financial instrument, as well as other relevant economic measures.

Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or liability. Unobservable inputs are used to measure fair value to the extent that observable inputs are not available, thereby allowing for situations in which there is little, if any, market activity for the asset or liability at the measurement date.

The fair value of the Company’s cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities approximate their carrying value due to their short-term nature. Due to the variable interest rates periodically adjusting with the current LIBOR, the carrying value of outstanding borrowings under the Company’s long-term debt approximates its fair value. (See Note 5). Certain assets and liabilities of the Company are required to be recorded at fair value on either a recurring or non-recurring basis. On a recurring basis, the Company records its marketable securities at fair value using Level 1 or Level 2 inputs. (See Note 3).

The Company’s non-financial assets measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis include goodwill and any assets and liabilities acquired in a business combination at acquisition date or any long-lived assets written down to fair value. The Company tests for impairment of such assets whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value may not be recoverable. To measure fair value of such assets, the Company uses Level 3 inputs consisting of techniques including an income approach and a market approach. The income approach is based on a discounted cash flow analysis and calculates the fair value by estimating the after-tax cash flows attributable to a reporting unit and then discounting the after-tax cash flows to a present value using a risk-adjusted discount rate. Assumptions used in the discounted cash flow analysis require the exercise of significant judgment, including judgment about appropriate discount rates and terminal value, growth rates and the amount and timing of expected future cash flows. With respect to goodwill, the Company first assesses qualitative factors to determine whether it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying value. If, based on that assessment, the Company believes it is more likely than not that the fair value is less than its carrying value, a two-step goodwill impairment test is performed. There have been no changes in events or circumstances which required impairment charges to be recorded during the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014.

All marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, net of tax, included in comprehensive earnings. Realized gains and losses, amortization of premiums and discounts, and interest and dividend income are included in interest income in the Consolidated Statements of Operations. The costs of securities sold are based on the specific identification method.

The following is a summary of available-for-sale securities:

At August 31, 2014 and March 2, 2014, the Company’s level 2 investments consisted of commercial paper which was not traded on a regular basis or in an active market, and the Company was unable to obtain pricing information on an ongoing basis. Therefore, these investments were measured using quoted market prices for similar assets currently trading in an active market or using model-derived valuations in which all significant inputs are observable for substantially the full term of the asset.

The following tables show the amortized cost basis of, and gross unrealized gains and losses and gross realized gains and losses on, the Company’s available-for-sale securities:

The estimated fair values of such securities at August 31, 2014, by contractual maturity, are shown below:

 Inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or market. Inventories consisted of the following:

On January 30, 2013, the Company entered into a five-year revolving credit facility agreement (the “Credit Agreement”) with PNC Bank, National Association (“PNC Bank”). The Credit Agreement provided for loans up to $52,000 (the “Facility”) to the Company and letters of credit up to $2,000 for the account of the Company. The Company borrowed $52,000 to finance a special dividend paid to shareholders of the Company in the 2013 fiscal year fourth quarter.

On February 12, 2014, the Company entered into a four-year amended and restated revolving credit facility agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”) with PNC Bank. The Amended Credit Agreement provides for loans up to $104,000 (the “Amended Facility”) to the Company and letters of credit up to $2,000 for the account of the Company. Through August 31, 2014, the Company has borrowed $52,000 to finance a special dividend paid to shareholders of the Company in the 2014 fiscal year fourth quarter and an additional $52,000 to continue the loan that was provided under the Credit Agreement, and PNC Bank has issued two standby letters of credit for the account of the Company in the total amount of $1,100 to secure the Company’s obligations under its workers’ compensation insurance program. The $104,000 outstanding borrowing under the Amended Credit Agreement is payable as follows: $10,000 due on February 12, 2015 followed by four quarterly installments of $2,500 and then eight quarterly installments of $3,750 with the remaining amount outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement payable on February 12, 2018.

Borrowings under the Amended Facility bear interest at a rate equal to, at the Company’s option, either a (a) LIBOR rate option determined by a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the LIBOR Rate plus 1.10% or (b) base rate option determined by a fluctuating rate per annum equal to the highest of (i) the Federal Funds Open Rate (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) plus 0.5%, (ii) the Prime Rate (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement), and (iii) the Daily LIBOR Rate (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement) plus 1.0%. Under the Amended Credit Agreement, the Company also is obligated to pay a nonrefundable commitment fee, accruing from February 12, 2014 until the earlier of February 12, 2018 and the date on which the Amended Credit Agreement is terminated, equal to 0.20% per annum multiplied by the average daily difference between the amount of (a) the revolving credit commitment and (b) the revolving facility usage, payable quarterly in arrears.

The Amended Credit Agreement also contains certain customary affirmative and negative covenants and customary financial covenants that require the Company to (a) maintain a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.10 to 1.00 at the end of each fiscal quarter and (b) not exceed a maximum funded debt ratio, which decreases periodically, of (i) 3.75 to 1.00 through February 28, 2015, (ii) 3.50 to 1.00 for the period March 1, 2015 through February 27, 2016, (iii) 3.00 to 1.00 for the period February 28, 2016 through February 25, 2017, and (iv) 2.25 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter. In addition, the Company must maintain minimum domestic liquid assets of $25,000 in cash and marketable securities and a quick ratio (as defined in the Amended Credit Agreement). On July 10, 2014, the Company and PNC Bank entered into an Amendment to the Amended Credit Agreement that modified the quick ratio, which, as modified, ranges from 8.50 to 1.00 to 8.00 to 1.00 through November 27, 2016 and is 3.25 to 1.00 for all periods thereafter. As of August 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with these financial covenants. The dividend covenant permits the Company to pay regular quarterly dividends in amounts not exceeding $0.10 per share and an annual special dividend to shareholders in amounts ranging from $1.00 to $2.50 with prior written notification to PNC Bank. The Company’s obligations under the Amended Credit Agreement are guaranteed by its Nelco Products, Inc., Neltec, Inc. and Park Aerospace Technologies Corp. subsidiaries and secured by a pledge of 65% of the capital stock of the Company’s Nelco Products Pte. Ltd. subsidiary in Singapore. The minimum domestic liquid assets of $25,000 are reflected as restricted cash on the Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets.

The Amended Facility is available to (a) refinance the Credit Agreement, (b) support working capital and general corporate needs, including the issuance of letters of credit, (c) fund special distributions to the Company’s shareholders permitted under the Amended Facility, and (d) finance ongoing capital expenditures and acquisitions. At August 31, 2014, $104,000 of indebtedness was outstanding under the Amended Credit Agreement with an interest rate of 1.30%. Interest expense recorded under the Facility and Amended Facility was approximately $360 and $713 during the 13 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively, ended August 31, 2014 and approximately $185 and $356 during the 13 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively, ended September 1, 2013, which is included in interest expense on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.

During the 2013 fiscal year, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $2,730 related to the closure of the Company’s Nelco Technology (Zhuhai FTZ) Ltd. business unit located in Zhuhai, China. The charges included a non-cash asset impairment charge of $3,620 related to property, plant and equipment and were net of the recapture of a non-cash cumulative currency translation adjustment of $1,465. The reclassification of the non-cash cumulative currency translation adjustment was included in foreign currency translation changes in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Earnings. The Company has a building with a carrying value of $2,029 as of August 31, 2014, which is held for sale at its Nelco Technology (Zhuhai FTZ) Ltd. business unit. The Company ceased depreciating this building during the 2013 fiscal year second quarter and expects to sell the building in the 2015 fiscal year. During the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014, the Company recorded $25 and $131, respectively, of additional pre-tax charges related to such closure and expects to record no significant additional charges in connection with such closure.

The Company recorded additional restructuring charges of $59 and $220, respectively, during the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 related to the closure of the Company’s New England Laminates Co., Inc. business unit located in Newburgh, New York. The New England Laminates Co., Inc. building in Newburgh, New York is held for sale. In the 2004 fiscal year, the Company reduced the book value of the building to zero, and the Company intends to sell it during the 2015 or 2016 fiscal year.

Basic earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per share are computed by dividing net earnings by the sum of (a) the weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period and (b) the potentially dilutive securities outstanding during the period. Stock options are the only potentially dilutive securities; and the number of dilutive options is computed using the treasury stock method.

The following table sets forth the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share:

Potentially dilutive securities, which were not included in the computation of diluted earnings per share because either the effect would have been anti-dilutive or the options’ exercise prices were greater than the average market price of the common stock, were approximately 28 and 267 for the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014 and September 1, 2013, respectively, and 26 and 493 for the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 and September 1, 2013, respectively.

During the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014, the Company issued 72 shares pursuant to the exercises of stock options and received proceeds from such exercises, recognized stock-based compensation expense and recognized tax benefits from stock-based compensation of $1,535, $605 and $38, respectively. These transactions resulted in a $2,179 increase in additional paid-in capital during the period.

The Company’s effective tax rates for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 were 13.1% and 15.4%, respectively, compared to (9.4%) and 3.8%, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013. The effective rates varied from the U.S. Federal statutory rate primarily due to foreign income taxed at lower rates and a tax refund described below. 

During the 2011 and 2012 fiscal years, the Company filed amended tax returns for the 2004, 2005, 2006 and 2007 fiscal years with the Internal Revenue Service (“IRS”) to claim a refund of taxes paid. The Company evaluated the tax position related to the claim for refund at June 2, 2013 and concluded that the tax position did not meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold. During the 13 weeks ended September 1, 2013, the IRS notified the Company that it had completed its examination and approved a portion of the Company’s refund claim in the amount of $1,949 plus interest. As a result, the Company reduced its total amount of unrecognized tax benefits reported at March 3, 2013 by $2,715. The Company recognized a tax benefit of $1,949 while no tax benefit was recognized for the remaining reduction in unrecognized tax benefits. The Company recorded a receivable for the net refund of $2,181, which was received subsequent to the period ended September 1, 2013. The unrecognized tax benefits recognized and interest received affected the effective tax rate and was recorded as a discrete tax benefit during the 13 weeks ended September 1, 2013.

The Company continuously evaluates the liquidity and capital requirements of its operations in the United States and of its foreign subsidiaries. As a result of such evaluation, the Company recorded a non-cash charge for the accrual of U.S. deferred income taxes in the amount of $63,958 on undistributed earnings of the Company’s subsidiary in Singapore during the fourth quarter of the 2014 fiscal year.

The Company is a global advanced materials company which develops, manufactures, markets and sells high technology digital and RF/microwave printed circuit materials principally for the telecommunications and internet infrastructure and high-end computing markets and advanced composite materials, parts and assemblies for the aerospace markets. The Company’s products are sold to customers in North America, Asia and Europe. The Company’s manufacturing facilities are located in Singapore, France, Kansas, Arizona and California. The Company operates as a single operating segment, which is advanced materials for the electronics and aerospace markets, with common management and identical or very similar economic characteristics, products, raw materials, manufacturing processes and equipment, customers and markets, marketing, sales and distribution methods and regulatory environments. The chief operating decision maker reviews financial information on a consolidated basis.

Sales are attributed to geographic region based upon the region in which the materials were delivered to the customer. Sales between geographic regions were not significant.

Financial information regarding the Company’s operations by geographic region is as follows:

Litigation 

The Company is subject to a number of proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, employment, product and other matters. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes in these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach, such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters. The Company believes that the ultimate disposition of such proceedings, lawsuits and claims will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, capital resources or business or its consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Environmental Contingencies 

The Company and certain of its subsidiaries have been named by the Environmental Protection Agency (the "EPA") or a comparable state agency under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation and Liability Act (the "Superfund Act") or similar state law as potentially responsible parties in connection with alleged releases of hazardous substances at four sites. In addition, a subsidiary of the Company has received a cost recovery claim under a state law similar to the Superfund Act from another private party involving one other site.

Under the Superfund Act and similar state laws, all parties who may have contributed any waste to a hazardous waste disposal site or contaminated area identified by the EPA or comparable state agency may be jointly and severally liable for the cost of cleanup. Generally, these sites are locations at which numerous persons disposed of hazardous waste. In the case of the Company's subsidiaries, generally the waste was removed from their manufacturing facilities and disposed at waste sites by various companies which contracted with the subsidiaries to provide waste disposal services. Neither the Company nor any of its subsidiaries have been accused of or charged with any wrongdoing or illegal acts in connection with any such sites. The Company believes it maintains an effective and comprehensive environmental compliance program.

The insurance carriers who provided general liability insurance coverage to the Company and its subsidiaries for the years during which the Company's subsidiaries' waste was disposed at these sites have in the past reimbursed the Company and its subsidiaries for 100% of their legal defense and remediation costs associated with three of these sites.

The total costs incurred by the Company and its subsidiaries in connection with these sites, including legal fees incurred by the Company and its subsidiaries and their assessed share of remediation costs and excluding amounts paid or reimbursed by insurance carriers, were approximately $17 and $24 in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively, ended August 31, 2014 and were nil and approximately $19 in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively, ended September 1, 2013. The Company had no recorded liabilities for environmental matters at August 31, 2014 or March 2, 2014.

The Company does not record environmental liabilities and related legal expenses for which the Company believes that it and its subsidiaries have general liability insurance coverage for the years during which the Company's subsidiaries' waste was disposed at three sites for which certain subsidiaries of the Company have been named as potentially responsible parties. Pursuant to such general liability insurance coverage, two insurance carriers have been paying 100% of the legal defense and remediation costs associated with such three sites since 1985. In the 2012 fiscal year fourth quarter, one of such insurance carriers, which had been paying 45% of such legal defense and remediation costs, indicated that it no longer agreed to such percentage. As a result, the Company commenced litigation against such insurance carriers and a third insurance carrier. The three insurance carriers have filed answers to the lawsuit, and one has asserted counterclaims against the Company. The insurance carriers and the Company are engaged in discussions to settle this matter. The Company does not expect any such settlement to have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, capital resources or business or its consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Included in selling, general and administrative expenses are charges for actual expenditures and accruals, based on estimates, for certain environmental matters described above. The Company accrues estimated costs associated with known environmental matters, when such costs can be reasonably estimated and when the outcome appears probable. The Company believes that the ultimate disposition of known environmental matters, including the litigation described above, will not have a material adverse effect on the Company’s liquidity, capital resources or business or its consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Recently Adopted

In March 2013, the FASB issued authoritative guidance which states that when a parent sells an investment in a foreign entity and ceases to have a controlling interest in that foreign entity, or when a foreign subsidiary disposes of substantially all of its assets, or when a parent acquires control of a foreign entity in which the parent held an equity interest before the acquisition date, the cumulative translation adjustment should be released into net earnings. The Company adopted this guidance effective March 3, 2014, the first day of the Company’s 2015 fiscal year, and the adoption of this guidance did not impact the Company’s consolidated results of operations, cash flows or financial position.

Recently Issued

In May 2014, the FASB issued authoritative guidance on the recognition of revenue from customers. Under this guidance, an entity will recognize revenue when it transfers promised goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects what it expects in exchange for the goods or services. This guidance also requires more detailed disclosures to enable users of the financial statements to understand the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with customers. This guidance is effective for fiscal years (and interim reporting periods within fiscal years) beginning after December 15, 2016. The Company is currently evaluating the impact this guidance will have on its consolidated results of operations, cash flows, financial position and disclosures and is currently unable to estimate the impact of this guidance.

Item 2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.

General:

Park Electrochemical Corp. (“Park” or the “Company”) is a global advanced materials company which develops, manufactures, markets and sells high-technology digital and RF/microwave printed circuit materials products principally for the telecommunications and internet infrastructure and high-end computing markets and advanced composite materials, parts and assemblies products for the aerospace markets. Park’s core capabilities are in the areas of polymer chemistry formulation and coating technology. The Company’s manufacturing facilities are located in Singapore, France, Kansas, Arizona and California. The Company also maintains research and development facilities in Arizona, Kansas and Singapore.

Financial Overview

The Company's total net sales worldwide in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014 were lower than in last year's comparable period principally as a result of lower sales of the Company’s printed circuit materials products in North America, partially offset by higher sales of the Company’s printed circuit materials products in Asia and higher sales of the Company’s aerospace composite materials, parts and assemblies. The Company's total net sales worldwide in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 were higher than in last year's comparable period principally as a result of higher sales of the Company’s printed circuit materials products in Asia, primarily in the 2015 fiscal year first quarter, and higher sales of the Company’s aerospace composite materials, parts and assemblies, partially offset by lower sales of the Company’s printed circuit materials products in North America. The Company’s total net sales worldwide in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014 were lower than in the 13 weeks ended June 1, 2014 principally as a result lower sales of the Company’s printed circuit materials products in Asia and North America.

The Company’s gross profit margin, measured as a percentage of sales, decreased to 28.7% in the 2015 fiscal year second quarter from 30.6% in the 2014 fiscal year second quarter principally as a result of lower sales and production levels of its printed circuit materials products in North America and the partially fixed nature of certain overhead costs, which were partly offset by the benefits from the higher percentage of sales of higher margin, high performance printed circuit materials products in the 2015 fiscal year second quarter than in the 2014 fiscal year second quarter and the growing percentage of sales of the more technically advanced high performance products. The Company’s gross profit margin increased to 31.9% in the 26-week period ended August 31, 2014 from 30.3% in last year’s comparable period. Such gross profit margin increase resulted from higher sales of its printed circuit materials products in Asia, primarily in the 2015 fiscal year first quarter, and higher sales of its aerospace products and the improved operating performance of the Company’s Park Aerospace Technologies Corp. (“PATC”) business unit in Newton, Kansas. Such gross profit margin increase was also attributable to the benefits from the higher percentage of sales of higher margin, high performance printed circuit materials products in the 26-week period ended August 31, 2014 than in the 26-week period ended September 1, 2013, and the growing percentage of sales of the more technically advanced high performance products.

The Company’s earnings from operations and net earnings were lower in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014 than in last year’s comparable period primarily as a result of the decrease in sales and the lower margin described above. Earnings from operations in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014, included pre-tax restructuring charges of $83,000 related to the closures of the Nelco Technology (Zhuhai FTZ) Ltd. (“Nelco Zhuhai”) facility located in the Free Trade Zone in Zhuhai, China and the New England Laminates Co., Inc. business unit located in Newburgh, New York, compared to a pre-tax restructuring charge of $119,000 related to the closure of the Nelco Zhuhai facility in the 13 weeks ended September 1, 2013. Net earnings in the 13 weeks ended September 1, 2013 included a tax benefit of $2.2 million in connection with a tax refund related to amended federal income tax returns. The Company’s earnings from operations and net earnings were higher in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 than in last year’s comparable period primarily as a result of the increase in sales and the higher margin described above. Earnings from operations in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 included pre-tax restructuring charges of $350,000 related to the closures of the facilities mentioned above and a pre-tax charge of $260,000, included in selling, general and administrative expenses, for additional fees incurred in connection with the 2014 fiscal year-end audit, compared to a pre-tax restructuring charge of $319,000 in the 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013 related to the closure of the Nelco Zhuhai facility. Net earnings in the 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013 included a tax benefit of $2.2 in connection with a tax refund related to amended federal income tax returns.

Results of Operations:

The following table provides the components of the consolidated statements of operations.

Net Sales

The Company’s total net sales worldwide in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014 decreased to $42.4 million from $44.5 million in the 13 weeks ended September 1, 2013 primarily as a result of lower sales of the Company’s printed circuit materials products in North America, partially offset by higher sales of the Company’s printed circuit materials products in Asia and higher sales of the Company’s aerospace composite materials, parts and assemblies.

The Company’s total net sales worldwide in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 increased to $91.2 from $87.9 million in the 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013 primarily as a result of higher sales of the Company’s printed circuit materials products in Asia and higher sales of the Company’s aerospace composite materials, parts and assemblies, partially offset by lower sales of the Company’s printed circuit materials products in North America.

The Company’s total net sales of its printed circuit materials products were $33.7 million and $73.6 million in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively, ended August 31, 2014, or 80% and 81%, respectively, of the Company’s total net sales worldwide in such periods, compared to $37.0 million and $73.7 million in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively, ended September 1, 2013, or 83% and 84%, respectively, of the Company’s total net sales worldwide in such periods. The Company’s total net sales of its aerospace composite materials, parts and assemblies products were $8.6 million and $17.6 million the 13 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively, ended August 31, 2014, or 20% and 19%, respectively, of the Company’s total net sales worldwide in such periods, compared to $7.5 million and $14.2 million in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively, ended September 1, 2013, or 17% and 16%, respectively, of the Company’s total net sales worldwide in such periods.

The Company's foreign sales were $23.1 million and $50.6 million, respectively, during the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014, or 54% and 55%, respectively, of the Company's total net sales worldwide during such periods, compared with $21.6 million and $44.3 million, respectively, of foreign sales, or 49% and 50%, respectively, of total net sales worldwide during last fiscal year's comparable periods. The Company’s foreign sales during the 13-week and 26-week periods ended August 31, 2014 increased 7% and 14%, respectively, from the 2014 fiscal year comparable periods as a result of higher sales in Asia in both periods.

For the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014, the Company’s sales in North America, Asia and Europe were 46%, 48% and 6%, respectively, of the Company’s total net sales worldwide compared to 51%, 43% and 6%, respectively, for the 13 weeks ended September 1, 2013. For the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014, the Company’s sales in North America, Asia and Europe were 45%, 49% and 6%, respectively, of the Company’s total net sales worldwide compared to 50%, 43% and 7%, respectively, for the 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013. The Company’s sales in North America decreased 16%, its sales in Asia increased 7% and its sales in Europe increased 1% in the 13-week period ended August 31, 2014 compared to the 13-week period ended September 1, 2013, and its sales in North America decreased 7%, its sales in Asia increased 19% and its sales in Europe decreased 14% in the 26-week period ended August 31, 2014 compared to the 26-week period ended September 1, 2013.

During the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014, the Company’s total net sales worldwide of high performance printed circuit materials were 92% and 93%, respectively, of the Company’s total net sales worldwide of printed circuit materials, compared to 88% and 87%, respectively, in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013.

The Company’s high performance printed circuit materials (non-FR4 printed circuit materials) include high-speed, low-loss materials for digital and RF/microwave applications requiring lead-free compatibility and high bandwidth signal integrity, bismalimide triazine (“BT”) materials, polyimides for applications that demand extremely high thermal performance and reliability, cyanate esters, quartz reinforced materials, and polytetrafluoroethylene (“PTFE”) and modified epoxy materials for RF/microwave systems that operate at frequencies up to 77GHz.

Gross Profit

The Company’s gross profit in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014 was lower than the gross profit in the prior year’s comparable period and the gross profit as a percentage of sales for the Company’s worldwide operations in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014 decreased to 28.7% from 30.6% in the 13 weeks ended September 1, 2013 primarily due to lower sales and production levels of its printed circuit materials products in North America and the partially fixed nature of certain overhead costs, which were partly offset by the benefits from the higher percentage of sales of higher margin, high performance printed circuit materials products in the 2015 fiscal year second quarter than in the 2014 fiscal year second quarter and the growing percentage of sales of the more technically advanced high performance products.

The Company’s gross profit in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 was higher than the gross profit in the prior year’s comparable period and the gross profit as a percentage of sales for the Company’s worldwide operations in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 increased to 31.9% from 30.3% in the 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013 primarily due to higher sales of its printed circuit materials products in Asia and higher sales of its aerospace products and the improved operating performance of the Company’s PATC business unit in Newton, Kansas. The increase in the gross profit margin in such 26-week period was also attributable to the benefits from the higher percentage of sales of higher margin, high performance printed circuit materials products in the 26-week period ended August 31, 2014 than in the 26-week period ended September 1, 2013 and the growing percentage of sales of the more technically advanced high performance products.

Selling, General and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses increased by $211,000 and by $251,000 during the 13 weeks and 26 weeks, respectively, ended August 31, 2014, or by 3% and 2%, respectively, compared with last fiscal year's comparable periods, and these expenses, measured as a percentage of sales, were 14.8% and 14.1%, respectively, in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 compared with 13.6% and 14.3%, respectively, in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013. Selling, general and administrative expenses included stock option expenses of $305,000 and $605,000, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014, compared to stock option expenses of $276,000 and $547,000, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013.

The increase in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014 was related primarily to the decrease in sales discussed above and the partially fixed nature of such expenses. The increase in such expenses in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014 was primarily the result of unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates and higher product sample expenses, partially offset by a decrease in shipping expenses as a result of the decrease in sales during such period as compared to the 2014 fiscal year comparable period.

The decrease in selling, general and administrative expenses as a percentage of sales in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 was related primarily to the increase in sales discussed above and the partially fixed nature of such expenses. The increase in such expenses in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 was primarily the result of a pre-tax charge of $260,000 incurred in connection with the 2014 fiscal year-end audit and unfavorable changes in foreign exchange rates, partially offset by a decrease in freight expenses and advertising expenses.

Restructuring Charges

In the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014, the Company recorded pre-tax restructuring charges of $83,000 and $350,000, respectively, in connection with the closure of its facilities located in Zhuhai, China and Newburgh, New York, compared to $119,000 and $319,000, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013 in connection with the closure of the facility in Zhuhai.

Earnings from Operations

For the reasons set forth above, the Company's earnings from operations were $5.8 million and $15.9 million, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014, which included restructuring charges of $83,000 and $350,000, respectively, and the additional fees of $260,000 in connection with the 2014 fiscal year-end audit, compared to $7.5 million and $13.7 million, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013, which included restructuring charges of $119,000 and $319,000, respectively.

Interest Expense

Interest expense in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 related to the Company’s outstanding borrowings under the four-year amended and restated revolving credit facility agreement that the Company entered into with PNC Bank, National Association in the fourth quarter of the 2014 fiscal year. The amended and restated agreement provides for loans of up to $104 million to the Company and letters of credit up to $2 million for the account of the Company and, subject to the terms and conditions of the agreement, an interest rate on the outstanding loan balance of LIBOR plus 1.10%. See “Liquidity and Capital Resources” and Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Report for additional information.

Interest Income

Interest income was $226,000 and $373,000, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 compared to $77,000 and $145,000, respectively, for last fiscal year's comparable periods. Interest income increased 194% and 157%, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 primarily as a result of a higher weighted average interest rate based on a larger amount of marketable securities held by the Company for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 compared with last fiscal year's comparable periods. During the 2015 and 2014 fiscal year periods, the Company earned interest income principally from its investments, which were primarily in short-term instruments and money market funds.

Income Tax Provision

The Company's effective income tax rate for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 was 13.1% and 15.4%, respectively, compared to (9.4%) and 3.8%, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013. The rates for the 2014 fiscal year periods were favorably affected by a tax benefit of $2.2 million recorded by the Company in the 2014 fiscal year second quarter in connection with a tax refund related to amended federal income tax returns.

Net Earnings

For the reasons set forth above, the Company's net earnings for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 were $5.0 million and $13.2 million, respectively, including the $83,000 pre-tax restructuring charge in such 13 weeks and the $350,000 pre-tax restructuring charge in such 26 weeks in connection with the closure of its facilities in Zhuhai, China and Newburgh, New York, compared to net earnings of $8.0 million and $13.0 million, respectively, for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013, including the $119,000 pre-tax restructuring charge in such 13 weeks and the $319,000 pre-tax restructuring charge in such 26 weeks in connection with the closure of Nelco Zhuhai and the tax benefit of $2.2 million in both such periods in connection with a tax refund related to amended federal income tax returns.

Basic and Diluted Earnings Per Share

Basic and diluted earnings per share for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 were $0.24 and $0.63, respectively, including in both such periods the pre-tax restructuring charges described above and the additional fees in connection with the 2014 fiscal year-end audit in the 26 week period, compared to basic and diluted earnings per share for the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013 of $0.39 and $0.62, respectively, including in both such periods the pre-tax restructuring charges in connection with the closure of Nelco Zhuhai and the tax benefit in connection with the tax refund related to amended federal income tax returns. The net impact of the restructuring charges, additional fees and tax benefits discussed above had no effect on the basic and diluted earnings per share in the 13 weeks ended August 31, 2014, reduced the basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.02 in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 and increased both the basic and diluted earnings per share by $0.10 and $0.09, respectively, in the 13 weeks and 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013.

Liquidity and Capital Resources:

Cash and Marketable Securities

Of the $285.2 million of cash and marketable securities at August 31, 2014, approximately $261.6 million was owned by certain of the Company’s wholly owned foreign subsidiaries. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company provided a non-cash charge for the accrual of U.S. deferred income taxes in the amount of $64.0 million on the undistributed earnings of the Company’s subsidiary in Singapore. The charge included $34.4 million related to the U.S. income tax that would be payable if the Company were to repatriate funds in an after-tax amount necessary to repay the Company’s existing $104.0 million principal amount bank loan from PNC Bank and an additional $29.6 million relating to the remainder of the undistributed earnings of the Company’s subsidiary in Singapore. The Company has no current plan to repatriate the undistributed earnings of its subsidiary in Singapore. The Company believes it has sufficient liquidity in the United States to fund its activities in the United States for the foreseeable future.

The change in cash, marketable securities and restricted cash at August 31, 2014 compared to March 2, 2014 was the result of cash provided by operating activities and a number of additional factors, including the following:

In addition, as described below, the Company paid $4.2 million in cash dividends in both the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 and the 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013.

Working Capital

The increase in working capital at August 31, 2014 compared to March 2, 2014 was due principally to the increases in cash and marketable securities and inventories partially offset by the increases in accounts payable and accrued liabilities and the increase in the current portion of long-term debt.

The Company's current ratio (the ratio of current assets to current liabilities) was 10.0 to 1 at August 31, 2014 compared to 12.8 to 1 at March 2, 2014.

Cash Flows

During the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014, net earnings from the Company's operations, before depreciation and amortization, stock based compensation and amortization of bond premium, of $16.1 million increased by a net reduction in working capital items, resulted in $18.2 million of cash provided by operating activities. During the same 26 weeks, the Company expended $232,000 for the purchase of property, plant and equipment, compared with $613,000 for the 26 weeks ended September 1, 2013, and paid $4.2 million in dividends on its common stock in each of such 26-week periods.

Debt

At August 31, 2014 and March 2, 2014, the Company had $104.0 million of bank debt. In the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company entered into a four-year amended and restated revolving credit facility agreement (the “Amended Credit Agreement”) with PNC Bank, National Association. The Amended Credit Agreement provides for loans up to $104.0 million to the Company and letters of credit up to $2.0 million for the account of the Company, and subject to the terms and conditions of the Amended Credit Agreement, an interest rate on the outstanding loan balance of LIBOR plus 1.10%. Other interest rate options are available to the Company under the Amended Credit Agreement. At the end of 2014, the Company borrowed $104.0 million under the Amended Credit Agreement and used all of such borrowed funds to finance the payment of a special cash dividend of $2.50 per share, totaling $52.2 million, paid to its shareholders on February 25, 2014 and to continue the $52.0 million loan that was provided under the credit facility agreement that the Company entered into with PNC Bank in January 2013 to finance the payment of a special cash dividend of $2.50 per share, totaling $52.0 million, paid to the Company’s shareholders on February 26, 2013. The Amended Credit Agreement entered into in 2014 replaced the credit facility agreement entered into in 2013. The Company incurred $0.7 million of interest expense in the 26 weeks ended August 31, 2014 under the Amended Credit Agreement. The $104.0 million outstanding amount under the Amended Credit Agreement will be paid as follows: $10.0 million due on February 12, 2015 followed by four quarterly installments of $2.5 million and then eight quarterly installments of $3.8 million with the remaining amount outstanding payable on February 12, 2018. The Amended Credit Agreement also contains certain customary affirmative and negative covenants and customary financial covenants, including maintaining minimum domestic liquid assets of $25,000 in cash and marketable securities. See Note 5 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included elsewhere in this Report.

Other Liquidity Factors

The Company believes its financial resources will be sufficient, for the foreseeable future, to provide for continued investment in working capital and property, plant and equipment and for general corporate purposes. Such resources would also be available for purchases of the Company's common stock, appropriate acquisitions and other expansions of the Company's business.

The Company is not aware of any circumstances or events that are reasonably likely to occur that could materially affect its liquidity.

Contractual Obligations:

The Company's contractual obligations and other commercial commitments to make future payments under contracts, such as lease agreements, consist only of (i) operating lease commitments and commitments to purchase raw materials and (ii) the bank debt described above. The Company has no other long-term debt, capital lease obligations, unconditional purchase obligations or other long-term obligations, standby letters of credit, guarantees, standby repurchase obligations or other commercial commitments or contingent commitments, other than two standby letters of credit in the total amount of $1.1 million to secure the Company's obligations under its workers' compensation insurance program.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements:

The Company's liquidity is not dependent on the use of, and the Company is not engaged in, any off-balance sheet financing arrangements, such as securitization of receivables or obtaining access to assets through special purpose entities.

Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates:

The foregoing Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations is based upon the Company's Consolidated Financial Statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. The preparation of these Financial Statements requires the Company to make estimates, assumptions and judgments that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues and expenses and the related disclosure of contingent liabilities. On an on-going basis, the Company evaluates its estimates, including those related to sales allowances, allowances for doubtful accounts, inventories, valuation of long-lived assets, income taxes, contingencies and litigation, and employee benefit programs. The Company bases its estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.

The Company’s critical accounting policies that are important to the Consolidated Financial Statements and that entail, to a significant extent, the use of estimates and assumptions and the application of management’s judgment are described in Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations”, in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 2, 2014. There have been no significant changes to such accounting policies during the 2015 fiscal year second quarter.

Contingencies:

The Company is subject to a small number of proceedings, lawsuits and other claims related to environmental, employment, product and other matters. The Company is required to assess the likelihood of any adverse judgments or outcomes in these matters as well as potential ranges of probable losses. A determination of the amount of reserves required, if any, for these contingencies is made after careful analysis of each individual issue. The required reserves may change in the future due to new developments in each matter or changes in approach, such as a change in settlement strategy in dealing with these matters.

Factors That May Affect Future Results.

Certain portions of this Report which do not relate to historical financial information may be deemed to constitute forward-looking statements that are subject to various factors which could cause actual results to differ materially from Park's expectations or from results which might be projected, forecast, estimated or budgeted by the Company in forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to, general conditions in the electronics and aerospace industries, the Company's competitive position, the status of the Company's relationships with its customers, economic conditions in international markets, the cost and availability of raw materials, transportation and utilities, and the various factors set forth in Item 1A “Risk Factors” and under the caption "Factors That May Affect Future Results" after Item 7 of Park's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 2, 2014.

Item 3.     Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk.

The Company's market risk exposure at August 31, 2014 is consistent with, and not greater than, the types of market risk and amount of exposures presented in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 2, 2014.

Item 4.     Controls and Procedures.

(a)     Disclosure Controls and Procedures.

The Company's management, with the participation of the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the "Exchange Act")) as of August 31, 2014, the end of the quarterly fiscal period covered by this quarterly report. Based on such evaluation, the Company's Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company's disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act and were effective in ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

(b)     Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting.

As disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended March 2, 2014, based on adjustments identified in the accounting for complex and non-routine transactions, management concluded that the Company did not have adequate policies and procedures in place to ensure the timely, effective review of such transactions. Therefore, there was a material weakness in the design and operating effectiveness of the internal control over these complex and non-routine transactions, and management concluded that the Company’s internal control over financial reporting was not effective as of March 2, 2014.     

In the period covered by this report, management implemented a plan to remediate the aforementioned material weakness and submitted the remediation plan to the Audit Committee of the Board of Directors of the Company and to the Company’s current independent registered public accounting firm. The steps that were implemented based upon the remediation plan included the enhancement of existing controls over the initial and subsequent accounting for certain complex and non-routine transactions, the continued use of third-party advisors and consultants to assist with areas requiring specialized accounting expertise and enhanced management review of complex and non-routine transactions.  Management and the Audit Committee believe that the implementation of these new control processes and procedures remediated the material weakness in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting and that, as a result, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting is effective as of the date of this report.

Except as described above, there has not been any change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company's internal control over financial reporting.

PART II. OTHER INFORMATION

Item 1.     Legal Proceedings.

None.

Item 1A. Risk Factors.

There have been no material changes in the risk factors as previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K Annual Report for the fiscal year ended March 2, 2014.

Item 2.          Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.

The following table provides information with respect to shares of the Company's Common Stock acquired by the Company during each month included in the Company’s 2015 fiscal year second quarter ended August 31, 2014.

Item 3.     Defaults Upon Senior Securities.

None.

Item 4.     Mine Safety Disclosures.

None.

Item 5.     Other Information.

None.

Item 6.     Exhibits.

*         Filed electronically herewith.

+         Pursuant to Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the Interactive Data Files on Exhibit 101 hereto are deemed not filed or part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, are deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise are not subject to liability under those sections.

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

EXHIBIT INDEX

29