PARK CITY GROUP INC - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
[X]
|
ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
For the
fiscal year ended June 30, 2019
or
[
]
|
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
001-34941
(Commission
file number)
PARK CITY GROUP, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Nevada
|
|
37-1454128
|
State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
|
|
|
5282
South Commerce Drive, Suite D292
Murray,
Utah 84107
|
|
(435)
645-2000
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Registrant's
telephone number, including area code)
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the
Act:
Title
of each Class
|
Trading
Symbol
|
Name of
each exchange on which registered
|
Common Stock, $0.01 Par
Value
|
PCYG
|
NASDAQ Capital
Market
|
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the
Act: None
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as
defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. [ ]
Yes [X] No
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports
pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. [ ]
Yes [X] No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. [X] Yes [
] No
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically
every Interactive Data File required to be submitted pursuant to
Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit such files).
[X] Yes [ ] No
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item
405 of Regulation S-K (§ 229.405 of this chapter) is not
contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of
registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information
statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. [ ]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting
company, or an emerging growth company. See the definitions of
“large accelerated filer,” “accelerated
filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and
“emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act.
Large
accelerated filer
|
[
]
|
Accelerated
filer
|
[X]
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
[
]
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
[X]
|
|
|
Emerging
Growth Company
|
[
]
|
If an
emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant
has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying
with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided
pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. [
]
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Rule 12b-2 of the Act).
[
] Yes [X] No
The
aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common stock
held by non-affiliates of the issuer as of December 31, 2018 which
is the last business day of the registrant’s most recently
completed second fiscal quarter, was approximately $64,653,279
(at a closing price of $5.97
per share).
As of
September 11, 2019,
19,821,188 shares of the
Company’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share
(“Common Stock”), were outstanding.
DOCUMENTS INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Items 10,
11, 12, 13 and 14 of Part III incorporate by reference certain
information from Park City Group, Inc.’s definitive proxy
statement, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on or before October 28, 2019.
TABLE OF CONTENTS TO ANNUAL
REPORT
ON FORM 10-K
YEAR ENDED JUNE 30, 2019
2
|
||
6
|
||
13
|
||
13
|
||
13
|
||
|
||
|
||
14
|
||
15
|
||
15
|
||
24
|
||
24
|
||
24
|
||
24
|
||
25
|
||
|
||
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
25
|
||
|
||
|
||
26
|
||
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
F-1
|
|
|
F-3
|
|
|
F-4
|
|
|
F-5
|
|
|
F-6
|
|
|
F-7
|
|
|
|
|
Exhibit
31
|
Certifications
of the Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002.
|
|
Exhibit
32
|
Certifications
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Sec. 1350 as adopted pursuant to Section 906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.
|
|
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking
statements. The words or phrases “would be,”
“will allow,” “intends to,” “will
likely result,” “are expected to,” “will
continue,” “is anticipated,”
“estimate,” “project,” or similar
expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking
statements.” Actual results could differ materially from
those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of a
number of risks and uncertainties, including the risk factors set
forth below and elsewhere in this Report. See “Risk
Factors” and “Management’s Discussion and
Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.” Statements made herein are as of the date
of the filing of this Form 10-K with the Securities and Exchange
Commission and should not be relied upon as of any subsequent
date. Unless otherwise required by applicable law, we do not
undertake, and specifically disclaim any obligation, to update any
forward-looking statements to reflect occurrences, developments,
unanticipated events or circumstances after the date of such
statement.
PART I
ITEM I.
|
BUSINESS
|
Overview
Park City Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) is a Software-as-a-Service
(“SaaS”) provider, and the parent company of ReposiTrak
Inc., which operates a business-to-business
(“B2B”) e-commerce, compliance, and supply chain
management platform that partners with retailers, wholesalers, and
product suppliers to help them source, vet, and transact with their
suppliers in order to accelerate sales, control risks, and improve
supply chain efficiencies.
The Company’s supply chain and MarketPlace
services provide its customers with greater flexibility in sourcing
products by enabling them to choose new suppliers and integrate
them into their supply chain faster and more cost effectively, and
it helps them to more efficiently manage these relationships,
enhancing revenue while lowering working capital, labor costs and
waste. The Company’s food safety and compliance solutions
help reduce a company’s potential regulatory, legal, and
criminal risk from its supply chain partners by providing a way for
them to ensure these suppliers are compliant with food safety
regulations, such as the Food Safety Modernization Act of 2011
(“FSMA”).
The
Company’s services are grouped in three application suites:
(i) ReposiTrak MarketPlace, encompassing the Company’s
supplier discovery and B2B e-commerce solutions, which helps the
Company’s customers find new suppliers, (ii) ReposiTrak
Compliance and Food Safety solutions, which help the
Company’s customers vet suppliers to mitigate the risk of
doing business with these suppliers, and (iii) ReposiTrak’s
Supply Chain solutions, which help the Company’s customers to
more efficiently manage their various transactions with their
suppliers.
The
Company’s services are delivered though proprietary software
products designed, developed, marketed and supported by the
Company. These products provide visibility and facilitate improved
business processes among all key constituents in the supply chain,
starting with the retailer and moving backwards to suppliers and
eventually to raw material providers. The Company provides
cloud-based applications and services that address e-commerce,
supply chain, food safety and compliance activities. The principal
customers for the Company’s products are household name
multi-store food retail chains and their suppliers, branded food
manufacturers, food wholesalers and distributors, and other food
service businesses.
The Company has a hub and spoke business model.
The Company is typically engaged by retailers and wholesalers
(“Hubs”), which in turn require their suppliers
(“Spokes”) to utilize the Company’s
services.
The
Company is incorporated in the state of Nevada and has three
principal subsidiaries: PC Group, Inc., a Utah corporation (98.76%
owned); Park City Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation (100% owned);
and ReposiTrak, Inc., a Utah corporation (100% owned). All
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements,
which contain the operating results of the operations of Park
City Group, Inc. (Delaware) and ReposiTrak, Inc. Park City Group,
Inc. (Nevada) has no business operations separate from the
operations conducted through its subsidiaries.
The
Company’s principal executive offices are located at 5282
South Commerce Drive, Suite D292, Murray, Utah 84107. Its telephone
number is (435) 645-2000. Its website address is
http://www.parkcitygroup.com, and ReposiTrak’s website
address is http://repositrak.com.
Company
History
The
Company’s technology has its genesis in the operations of
Mrs. Fields Cookies co-founded by Randall K. Fields, the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer. The Company began
operations utilizing patented computer software and profit
optimization consulting services to help its retail clients reduce
their inventory and labor costs.
On
January 13, 2009, the Company acquired 100% of Prescient Applied
Intelligence, Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Prescient”), a provider of
solutions for retailers which, amongst other things, captured
information about transactions between retailers and their
suppliers.
In
February 2014, Prescient changed its name to Park City Group, Inc.
As a result, both the parent-holding company (Nevada) and its
operating subsidiary (Delaware) were named Park City Group,
Inc.
In June
2015, the Company elected to exercise an option to acquire a 75%
interest in ReposiTrak from Leavitt Partners, LP for a cash payment
and negotiated the purchase of the remaining 25% with an exchange
of shares of the Company. As a result, ReposiTrak became a wholly
owned subsidiary of the Company.
As of
June 30, 2019, the Company substantially completed the convergence
of its Supply Chain and Compliance, Food Safety, MarketPlace
supplier discovery and B2B e-commerce
solution. As a result, the Company is now largely capable of
delivering its services through a single ReposiTrak branded user
interface.
Target Industries Overview
The
Company develops its software and services for multi-store retail chains, wholesalers and
distributors, and their suppliers. The bulk of the
Company’s customers are in the U.S. consumer retail sector
for food and general merchandise, although the Company’s
software and services are not sold exclusively to this customer
base, and the Company believes that its software and services are
also applicable to a wide variety of other potential customers
domestically and abroad.
Backdrop
The
U.S. consumer retail sector in general, and food and general
merchandise retailers more acutely, are facing pressure from
several significant forces. These include (i) increased competitive
pressures from the rise of online retailers, (ii) increased
regulatory and tort risks, particularly for food retailers, as a
result of the passage of the Food Safety Modernization Act
(“FSMA”) which
placed greater responsibility for the safety of products on the
participants in the food supply chain, and (iii) the pressure from
consumers to increase product diversity, and in particular, the
number of smaller, localized vendors
Solutions and Services
The
Company’s software and services are designed to address the
business problems faced by our customers. These solutions are
delivered via a cloud-based infrastructure and grouped in three product application suites that
mirror the workflow of the Company’s customers as they manage
the activities of their supply chain.
Key Application Suites
●
ReposiTrak
MarketPlace is the
Company’s supplier discovery and B2B e-commerce solution.
MarketPlace provides the Company’s customers with greater
flexibility in sourcing products by enabling them to screen and
choose suppliers based on a wide variety of criteria, including,
but not limited to, predetermined compliance characteristics, and
then to integrate these suppliers into their supply chain faster
and more cost effectively. MarketPlace helps the Company’s
customers respond to competitive pressures from online
retailers by providing them with greater capabilities to increase
local sourcing, tailor their product offering to local market
tastes, and stock their stores appropriately for local events.
MarketPlace is also beneficial to suppliers connected to ReposiTrak’s platform
in that they can use MarketPlace to highlight the products that
they sell to generate incremental sales. The business model for
MarketPlace is evolving as the Company’s customers help to
develop new use cases for the application. In some situations, the
Company acts as an agent for suppliers or provides supply chain
technology services. In other situations, at the customer’s
request, the Company may act as the supplier for certain
products.
●
ReposiTrak
Compliance and Food Safety Solutions help the Company’s customers reduce
potential regulatory and legal risk from their supply chain
partners. The Company does this by providing a way of gathering the
array of documents that may be needed for the customer to determine
that its suppliers are compliant with a wide variety of criteria
including, but not limited to, food safety regulations, such as
those required by the FMSA and
general business compliance standards such as adequate liability
insurance. The Company’s Compliance and Food Safety
solutions currently include four main applications: Vendor
Validation, Compliance Management, Quality Management Systems
(“QMS”) and
Track & Trace. ReposiTrak also hosts and is integrated with the
food safety audit database of the Safe Quality Food Institute
(“SQFI”). SQFI
is one of the leading schemas for certifying that a food
retailer’s suppliers are compliant with Global Food Safety
Initiative (“GFSI”) standards, which many food
retailers require of their suppliers as a condition of doing
business. SQFI is owned and operated by the Food Marketing
Institute (“FMI”), one of the food
industry’s largest trade associations.
●
ReposiTrak
Supply Chain Solutions
help the Company’s customers to
more efficiently manage relationships with suppliers so that
they can “stock less and sell more” by reducing
inventory, labor costs and waste while also increasing
revenue. The Company is a leader in
helping its customers to manage their relationship with
Direct Store Delivery (“DSD”) suppliers. The Company has observed that its
customers are shifting a greater percentage of their product
mix to DSD suppliers to lower their operating costs. Through a process known as Scan Based Trading
(“SBT”) the Company
enables its customers to sell products from DSD suppliers on a
consignment basis, which lowers their working capital requirements
by shifting the financial burden of the inventory to the supplier.
Other Supply Chain solutions include ScoreTracker, Vendor Managed
Inventory, Store Level Ordering and Replenishment, Enterprise
Supply Chain Planning, Fresh Market Manager and
ActionManager®, all of which are designed to aid the
Company’s customer in managing inventory, product mix and
labor while improving sales through the reduction of out of stocks
by improving visibility and forecasting.
Professional Services
The
Company has two professional services groups: (i) the Business
Analytics Group offers business-consulting services to suppliers
and retailers in the grocery, convenience store and specialty
retail industries, and (ii) the Professional Services Group
provides consulting services to ensure that our solutions are
seamlessly integrated into our customers’ business processes
as quickly and efficiently as possible.
Technology, Development and Operations
Product Development
The
Company’s product development strategy is focused on creating
common technology elements that can be leveraged in multiple
applications across our core markets. To remain competitive, the
Company is currently designing, coding and testing new products and
developing expanded functionality of its current
products.
Operations
We
currently serve our customers from a third-party data center
hosting facility. Along with the Company’s Statement on
Standards for Attestation Engagements (“SSAE”) No. 16 certification
Service Organization Control (“SOC2”), the third-party facility
is also a SSAE No. 16 – SOC2 certified location and is
secured by around-the-clock guards, biometric screening and
escort-controlled access, and is supported by on-site backup
generators in the event of a power failure.
Customers
The
Company is currently engaged primarily by food related consumer
goods retailers, wholesalers, and their suppliers. The bulk of the
Company’s customers are in the U.S. consumer retail sector
for food and general merchandise. However, the Company is
opportunistic and will offer its solutions to a wide variety of
other potential customers. Target Corporation accounted for
approximately 8.5% of the
Company’s total revenue in the fiscal year ended June 30,
2019.
Sales, Marketing and Customer Support
Sales and Marketing
Through
a focused and dedicated sales effort designed to address the
requirements of each of its solutions, the Company believes it is
well positioned to understand its customers’ businesses,
trends in the marketplace, competitive products and opportunities
for new product development.
The
Company’s primary marketing objectives have been to increase
awareness of our solutions, generate sales leads and develop new
customer relationships. To this end, the Company attends industry
trade shows, conducts direct marketing programs, publishes industry
trade articles, participates in interviews and selectively
advertises in industry publications.
In
fiscal 2016 the Company embarked on a process of repurposing the
Company’s supply chain applications so that they can be
delivered via ReposiTrak’s highly scalable online
infrastructure and launching its MarketPlace supplier discovery and B2B e-commerce solution on
this same infrastructure. As a result, the Company is now largely
capable of delivering its services through a single ReposiTrak
branded user interface.
With
the convergence of the Company’s solutions to a single
delivery platform, the Company also reorganized its sale force and
reoriented its marketing efforts. This process involved
streamlining the sales force to enable cross-selling
by reducing regional account managers and shifting our sales
emphasis towards the Company’s inside sales team located at
its corporate headquarters in Murray, Utah.
Customer Support
The
Company’s global customer support group responds to both
business and technical inquiries from its customers relating to how
to use its solutions and is available to customers by telephone and
email. Basic customer support during business hours is available to
customers. Premier customer support includes extended availability
and additional services and is available along with additional
support services such as developer support and partner support for
an additional fee.
Competition
The
Company competes with a myriad of software vendors, developers and
integrators, business-to-business exchanges, consulting firms,
focused solution providers, and business intelligence technology
platforms. Although our competitors are often considerably larger
companies in size with larger sales forces and marketing budgets,
the Company believes that its deep industry knowledge, the breadth
and depth of our offerings, and our relationships with key
industry, wholesaler, and other trade groups and associations,
gives it a competitive advantage.
Patents and Proprietary Rights
The
Company relies on a combination of trademark, copyright, trade
secret and patent laws in the United States and other jurisdictions
as well as confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions to
protect our proprietary technology and our name. We also enter into
confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants and
other third parties and control access to software, documentation
and other proprietary information.
The
Company has been awarded nine U.S. patents, eight U.S. registered
trademarks and has 37 U.S. copyrights relating to its software
technology and solutions. The Company’s patent portfolio has
been transferred to an unrelated third party, although the Company
retains the right to use the licensed patents in connection with
its business. The Company’s policy is to continue to seek
patent protection for all developments, inventions and improvements
that are patentable and have potential value to the Company and to
protect its trade secrets and other confidential and proprietary
information, and the Company intends to defend its intellectual
property rights to the extent its resources
permit.
The
Company is not aware of any patent infringement claims against it;
however, there are no assurances that litigation to enforce patents
issued to the Company to protect proprietary information, or to
defend against the Company’s alleged infringement of the
rights of others will not occur. Should any such litigation
occur, the Company may incur significant litigation costs, and it
may result in resources being diverted from other planned
activities, which may have a materially adverse effect on the
Company’s operations and financial condition.
Employees
As of
June 30, 2019, the Company employed a total of 74 employees. Of these employees,
7 are located
overseas. The Company plans to continue expanding its offshore
workforce to augment its analytics services offerings, expand its
professional services and to provide additional programming
resources. The employees are not represented by any labor
union.
Reports to Security Holders
The
Company is subject to the informational requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the
“Exchange
Act”). Accordingly, it files annual, quarterly
and other reports and information with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”). The SEC maintains an
Internet site (www.sec.gov) that contains reports, proxy and
information statements, and other information regarding issuers
that file electronically with the SEC. Copies of these reports,
proxy and information statements and other information may be
obtained by electronic request at the following e-mail address:
publicinfo@sec.gov.
Government Regulation and Approval
Like
all businesses, the Company is subject to numerous federal, state
and local laws and regulations, including regulations relating to
patent, copyright, and trademark law matters.
Cost of Compliance with Environmental Laws
The
Company currently has no costs associated with compliance with
environmental regulations and does not anticipate any future costs
associated with environmental compliance; however, there can be no
assurance that it will not incur such costs in the
future.
ITEM 1A.
|
RISK FACTORS
|
An investment in our common stock is subject to many risks. You
should carefully consider the risks described below, together with
all of the other information included in this Annual Report on Form
10-K, including the financial statements and the related notes,
before you decide whether to invest in our common stock. Our
business, operating results and financial condition could be harmed
by any of the following risks. The trading price of our common
stock could decline due to any of these risks, and you could lose
all or part of your investment.
Risks Related to the Company
We have incurred losses in the past and there can be no assurance
that we will operate profitably in the future.
Our
marketing strategy emphasizes sales of subscription-based services,
instead of annual licenses, and contracting with suppliers
(“Spokes”) to
connect to our clients (“Hubs”). This strategy has
resulted in the development of a foundation of retail and wholesale
Hubs to which suppliers can be “connected,”
thereby accelerating future growth. If, however, this marketing
strategy fails, revenue and operations will be negatively affected.
We had net income of $3,902,406
for the year ended June 30, 2019, compared to a net income of
$3,408,783 for the year ended June 30, 2018. Although we generated
net income in the year ended June 30, 2019, there can be no
assurance that we will achieve profitability in future periods. We
cannot provide assurance that we will continue to generate revenue
or have sustainable profits. If we do not operate profitably in the
future, our current cash resources will be used to fund our
operating losses. Continued losses would have an adverse effect on
the long-term value of our Common Stock and any investment in the
Company.
Although our cash resources are currently sufficient, our long-term
liquidity and capital requirements may be difficult to predict,
which may adversely affect our long-term cash
position.
Historically, we
have been successful in raising capital when necessary, including
through private placements, a registered direct offering, and stock
issuances to our officers and directors, including our Chief
Executive Officer, to pay our indebtedness and fund our operations,
in addition to cash flow from operations. If we are required
to seek additional financing in the future in order to fund our
operations, retire our indebtedness and otherwise carry out our
business plan, there can be no assurance that such financing will
be available on acceptable terms, or at all, and there can be no
assurance that any such arrangement, if required or otherwise
sought, would be available on terms deemed to be commercially
acceptable and in our best interests.
Our business is dependent upon the continued services of our
founder and Chief Executive Officer, Randall K. Fields. Should
we lose the services of Mr. Fields, our operations will be
negatively impacted.
Our
business is dependent upon the expertise and continued service of
our founder and Chief Executive Officer, Randall K. Fields. Mr.
Fields is essential to our operations. Accordingly, an investor
must rely on Mr. Fields’ management decisions that will
continue to control our business affairs. We currently maintain key
man insurance on Mr. Fields’ life in the amount of
$5,000,000; however, that coverage would be inadequate to
compensate for the loss of his services. The loss of the services
of Mr. Fields would have a materially adverse effect upon our
business.
Risk Relating to Business Operations
Quarterly and annual operating results may fluctuate, which makes
it difficult to predict future performance.
Management expects
a significant portion of our revenue stream to come from the sale
of subscriptions, and to a lesser extent, transactions processed
though MarketPlace, license sales, maintenance and professional
services charged to new customers. These amounts will
fluctuate and are uncertain because predicting future sales is
difficult and involves speculation. In addition, we may
potentially experience significant fluctuations in future operating
results caused by a variety of factors, many of which are
outside of our control, including:
●
our
ability to retain and increase sales to existing customers, attract
new customers and satisfy our customers’
requirements;
●
the
renewal rates for our subscriptions and other
services;
●
changes
in our pricing policies, whether initiated by us or as a result of
competition;
●
the
cost, timing and management effort for the introduction of new
services, including new features to our existing
services;
●
the
rate of expansion and productivity of our sales force;
●
new
product and service introductions by our competitors;
●
variations
in the revenue mix of editions or versions of our
service;
●
technical
difficulties or interruptions in our service;
●
general
economic conditions that may adversely affect either our
customers’ ability or willingness to purchase additional
subscriptions or upgrade their services, or delay a prospective
customer’s purchasing decision, or reduce the value of new
subscription contracts or affect renewal rates;
●
timing
of additional expenses and investments in infrastructure to support
growth in our business;
●
regulatory
compliance costs;
●
consolidation
in the food industry;
●
the
timing of customer payments and payment defaults by
customers;
●
extraordinary
expenses such as litigation or other dispute-related settlement
payments;
●
the
impact of new accounting pronouncements;
●
the
timing of stock awards to employees and the related financial
statement impact; and
●
system
or service failures, security breaches or network
downtime.
Future
operating results may fluctuate because of the foregoing factors,
making it difficult to predict operating
results. Period-to-period comparisons of operating results are
not necessarily meaningful and should not be relied upon as an
indicator of future performance. In addition, a large portion
of our expense will be fixed in the short-term, particularly with
respect to facilities and personnel making future operating results
sensitive to fluctuations in revenue.
We face threats from competing and
emerging technologies that may affect our profitability, as well as
competitors that are larger and have greater financial and
operational resources that may give them an advantage in the
market.
Markets
for our type of software products and that of our competitors are
characterized by development of new software, software solutions or
enhancements that are subject to constant change; rapidly evolving
technological change; and unanticipated changes in customer needs.
Because these markets are subject to such rapid change, the life
cycle of our products is difficult to predict. As a result, we
are subject to the following risks: whether or how we will respond
to technological changes in a timely or cost-effective manner;
whether the products or technologies developed by our competitors
will render our products and services obsolete or shorten the life
cycle of our products and services; and whether our products and
services will achieve market acceptance.
Moreover,
many of our competitors are larger and have greater financial and
operational resources than we do. This may allow them to offer
better pricing terms to customers in the industry, which could
result in a loss of potential or current customers or could force
us to lower prices. Our competitors may have the ability to
devote more financial and operational resources to the development
of new technologies that provide improved operating functionality
and features to their product and service offerings. If
successful, their development efforts could render our product and
service offerings less desirable to customers, again resulting in
the loss of customers or a reduction in the price we can demand for
our offerings. Any of these actions could have a significant effect
on revenue.
We face risks associated with new product
introductions.
Our
future revenue is dependent upon the successful and timely
development of new and enhanced versions of our products and
potential product offerings suitable to the customers’
needs. If we fail to successfully upgrade existing products
and develop new products, and those new products do not achieve
market acceptance, our revenue will be negatively
impacted.
It may
be difficult for us to assess risks associated with potential new
product offerings:
●
It may
be difficult for us to predict the amount of service and
technological resources that will be needed by customers of new
offerings, and if we underestimate the necessary resources, the
quality of our service will be negatively impacted, thereby
undermining the value of the product to the customer;
●
technological
issues between us and our customers may be experienced in capturing
data necessary for new product offerings, and these technological
issues may result in unforeseen conflicts or technological setbacks
when implementing these products, which could result in material
delays and even result in a termination of the
engagement;
●
a
customer’s experience with new offerings, if negative, may
prevent us from having an opportunity to sell additional products
and services to that customer;
●
if
customers do not use our products as recommends and/or fail to
implement any needed corrective action(s), it is unlikely that
customers will experience the business benefits from these products
and may, therefore, be hesitant to continue the engagement as well
as acquire any other products from us; and
●
delays
in proceeding with the implementation of new products for a new
customer will negatively affect our cash flow and our ability to
predict cash flow.
We cannot accurately predict renewal or upgrade rates and the
impact these rates may have on our future revenue and operating
results.
Our
customers have no obligation to renew their subscriptions for our
service after the expiration of their initial subscription period.
Our renewal rates may decline or fluctuate as a result of factors,
including customer dissatisfaction with our service,
customers’ ability to continue their operations and spending
levels, consolidation, and deteriorating general economic
conditions. If our customers do not renew their subscriptions for
our service or reduce the level of service at the time of renewal,
our revenue will decline, and our business will
suffer.
Our
future success also depends in part on our ability to increase
rates, sell additional features and services, or addition
subscriptions to our current customers. This may also require
increasingly sophisticated and costly sales and marketing efforts
that are targeted at senior management. If these strategies fail,
we will need to refocus our efforts toward other solutions, which
could lead to increased development and marketing costs, delayed
revenue streams, and otherwise negatively affect our
operations.
If our Compliance and Food Safety solutions do not perform as
expected, whether as a result of operator error or otherwise, it
could impair our operating results and reputation.
Our
success depends on the food safety market’s confidence that
we can provide reliable, high-quality reporting for our customers.
We believe that our customers are likely to be particularly
sensitive to product defects and operator errors, including if our
systems fail to accurately report issues that could reduce the
liability of our clients in the event of a product recall. In
addition, our reputation and the reputation of our products can be
adversely affected if our systems fail to perform as expected.
However, if our customers or potential customers fail to implement
and use our systems as suggested by us, they may not be able to
deal with a recall as effectively as they could have. As a result,
the failure or perceived failure of our products to perform as
expected, could have a material adverse effect on our revenue,
results of operations and business.
If a customer is sued because of a recalled product we could be
joined in that suit, the defense of which would impair our
operating results.
We
believe our Compliance and Food Safety solutions would be helpful
in the event of a recall. However, their ultimate usefulness is
dependent on how the customer uses our products, which is in many
ways out of our control. Similarly, a customer which is a defendant
in a product liability case could claim that had our services
performed as represented the extent of potential liability would
have been minimized and therefore, we should have some contributory
liability in the case. Defending such a claim could have a
material adverse effect on our revenue, results of operations and
business.
The deployment of our services, or consultation provided by our
personnel, could result in litigation naming us as a party, which
litigation could result in a material and adverse effect on us, and
our results of operations.
Our
Compliance and Food Safety solutions are marketed to potential
customers based, in part, on our service’s ability to reduce
a company’s potential regulatory, legal, and criminal risk
from its supply chain partners. In the event litigation is
commenced against a customer based on issues caused by a
constituent in the supply chain, or consultation provided by our
personnel, we could be joined or named in such litigation. As a
result, we could face substantial defense costs. In addition, any
adverse determination resulting in such litigation could have a
material and adverse effect on us, and our results of
operations.
We face risks relating to the sale and delivery of merchandise to
customers.
We
depend on a number of other companies to perform functions critical
to our ability to deliver products to our customers, including
maintaining inventory, preparing merchandise for shipment to our
customers and delivering purchased merchandise on a timely basis.
We also depend on the delivery services that we and they utilize.
We also depend on our partners to ensure proper labelling of
products. Issues or concerns regarding, product safety, labelling,
content or quality could result in consumer or governmental claims.
In limited circumstances, we sell merchandise that we have
purchased. In these instances, we assume the risks related to
inventory.
We face risks associated with proprietary protection of our
software.
Our
success depends on our ability to develop and protect existing and
new proprietary technology and intellectual property
rights. We seek to protect our software, documentation
and other written materials primarily through a combination of
patents, trademarks, and copyright laws, trade secret laws,
confidentiality procedures and contractual provisions. While
we have attempted to safeguard and maintain our proprietary rights,
there are no assurances that we will be successful in doing
so. Our competitors may independently develop or patent
technologies that are substantially equivalent or superior to
ours.
Despite
our efforts to protect our proprietary rights, unauthorized parties
may attempt to copy aspects of our products or obtain and use
information that we regard as proprietary. In some types of
situations, we may rely in part on ‘shrink wrap’ or
‘point and click’ licenses that are not signed by the
end user and, therefore, may be unenforceable under the laws of
certain jurisdictions. Policing unauthorized use of our
products is difficult. While we are unable to determine the
extent to which piracy our software exists, software piracy can be
expected to be a persistent problem, particularly in foreign
countries where the laws may not protect proprietary rights as
fully as the United States. We can offer no assurance that our
means of protecting our proprietary rights will be adequate or that
our competitors will not reverse engineer or independently develop
similar technology.
We may discover software errors in our products that may result in
a loss of revenue, injury to our reputation or subject us to
substantial liability.
Non-conformities or
bugs (“errors”)
may be found from time to time in our existing, new or enhanced
products after commencement of commercial shipments, resulting in
loss of revenue or injury to our reputation. In the past, we
have discovered errors in our products and as a result, have
experienced delays in the shipment of products. Errors in our
products may be caused by defects in third-party software
incorporated into our products. If so, we may not be able to
fix these defects without the cooperation of these software
providers. Because these defects may not be as significant to
the software provider as they are to us, we may not receive the
rapid cooperation that may be required. We may not have the
contractual right to access the source code of third-party
software, and even if we do have access to the code, we may not be
able to fix the defect. In addition, our customers may use our
service in unanticipated ways that may cause a disruption in
service for other customers attempting to access their
data. Since our customers use our products for critical
business applications, any errors, defects or other performance
problems could hurt our reputation and may result in damage to our
customers’ business. If that occurs, customers could
elect not to renew, delay or withhold payment to us, we could lose
future sales or customers may make warranty or other claims against
us, which could result in an increase in our provision for doubtful
accounts, an increase in collection cycles for accounts receivable
or the expense and risk of litigation. These potential scenarios,
successful or otherwise, would likely be time consuming and
costly.
Interruptions or delays in service from our third-party data center
hosting facility could impair the delivery of our service and harm
our business.
We
currently serve our customers from a third-party data center
hosting facility located in the United States. Any damage to, or
failure of, our systems generally could result in interruptions in
our service. As we continue to add capacity, we may move or
transfer our data and our customers’ data. Despite
precautions taken during this process, any unsuccessful data
transfers may impair the delivery of our service. Further, any
damage to, or failure of, our systems generally could result in
interruptions in our service. Interruptions in our service may
reduce our revenue, cause us to issue credits or pay penalties,
cause customers to terminate their subscriptions and adversely
affect our renewal rates and our ability to attract new customers.
Our business will also be harmed if our customers and potential
customers believe our service is unreliable.
As part
of our current disaster recovery arrangements, our production
environment and all of our customers’ data is currently
replicated in near real-time in a separate facility physically
located in a different region of the United States. We do not
control the operation of these facilities, and they are vulnerable
to damage or interruption from earthquakes, floods, fires, power
loss, telecommunications failures and similar events. They may also
be subject to break-ins, sabotage, intentional acts of vandalism
and similar misconduct. Despite precautions taken at these
facilities, the occurrence of a natural disaster or an act of
terrorism, a decision to close the facilities without adequate
notice or other unanticipated problems at these facilities could
result in lengthy interruptions in our service. Even with the
disaster recovery arrangements, our service could be
interrupted.
If our security measures are breached and unauthorized access is
obtained to a customer’s data, our data or our information
technology systems, our service may be perceived as not being
secure, customers may curtail or stop using our service and we may
incur significant legal and financial exposure and
liabilities.
Our
service involves the storage and transmission of customers’
proprietary information, and security breaches could expose us to a
risk of loss of this information, litigation and possible
liability. These security measures may be breached as a result of
third-party action, including intentional misconduct by computer
hackers, employee error, malfeasance or otherwise during transfer
of data to additional data centers or at any time, and result in
someone obtaining unauthorized access to our customers’ data
or our data, including our intellectual property and other
confidential business information, or our information technology
systems. Additionally, third parties may attempt to fraudulently
induce employees or customers into disclosing sensitive
information, such as user names, passwords or other information in
order to gain access to our customers’ data or our data,
including our intellectual property and other confidential business
information, or our information technology systems. Because the
techniques used to obtain unauthorized access, or to sabotage
systems, change frequently and generally are not recognized until
launched against a target, we may be unable to anticipate these
techniques or to implement adequate preventative measures. Any
security breach could result in a loss of confidence in the
security of our service, damage our reputation, disrupt our
business, lead to legal liability and negatively impact our future
sales.
Weakened global economic conditions may adversely affect our
industry, business and results of operations.
The
rate at which our customers purchase new or enhanced services
depends on several factors, including general economic conditions.
The United States and other key international economies have
experienced in the past a downturn in which economic activity was
impacted by falling demand for a variety of goods and services,
restricted credit, poor liquidity, reduced corporate profitability,
volatility in credit, equity and foreign exchange markets,
bankruptcies and overall uncertainty with respect to the economy.
These conditions affect the rate of information technology spending
and could adversely affect our customers’ ability or
willingness to purchase our enterprise cloud computing services,
delay prospective customers’ purchasing decisions, reduce the
value or duration of their subscription contracts or affect renewal
rates, all of which could adversely affect our operating
results.
Risks Relating to Our Common Stock
Our quarterly results of operations may fluctuate in the future,
which could result in volatility in our stock price.
Our
quarterly revenue and results of operations have varied in the past
and may fluctuate as a result of a variety of factors. If our
quarterly revenue or results of operations fluctuate, the price of
our Common Sstock could decline substantially. Fluctuations in our
results of operations may be due to several factors, including, but
not limited to, those listed and identified throughout this
“Risk Factors”
section.
The limited public market for our stock may adversely affect an
investor’s ability to liquidate an investment in
us.
Although our Common
Stock is currently quoted on the NASDAQ Capital Market, there is
limited trading activity. We can give no assurance that an
active market will develop, or if developed, that it will be
sustained. If an investor acquires shares of our Common Stock,
the investor may not be able to liquidate our shares should there
be a need or desire to do so.
Future issuances of our shares may lead to future dilution in the
value of our common stock, will lead to a reduction in shareholder
voting power and may prevent a change in control.
The
shares may be substantially diluted due to the
following:
●
issuance
of Common Stock in connection with funding agreements with third
parties and future issuances of common and Preferred Stock by the
Board of Directors; and
●
the
Board of Directors has the power to issue additional shares of
Common Stock and Preferred Stock and the right to determine the
voting, dividend, conversion, liquidation, preferences and other
conditions of the shares without shareholder approval.
Stock
issuances may result in reduction of the book value or market price
of outstanding shares of Common Stock. If we issue any
additional shares of Common or Preferred Stock, proportionate
ownership of Common Stock and voting power will be
reduced. Further, any new issuance of Common or Preferred
Stock may prevent a change in control or
management.
Our officers and directors have significant control over us, which
may lead to conflicts with other stockholders over corporate
governance.
Our
officers and directors, including our Chief Executive Officer,
Randall K. Fields, control approximately 41% of our Common Stock. Mr.
Fields, individually controls 33% of our Common Stock. Consequently,
Mr. Fields individually, and our officers and directors, as
stockholders acting together, can significantly influence all
matters requiring approval by our stockholders, including the
election of directors and significant corporate transactions, such
as mergers or other business combination transactions.
Our corporate charter contains authorized, unissued “blank
check” Preferred Stock issuable without stockholder approval
with the effect of diluting then current stockholder
interests.
Our
articles of incorporation currently authorize the issuance of up to
30,000,000 shares of ‘blank check’ Preferred Stock with
designations, rights, and preferences as may be determined from
time to time by our Board of Directors, of which 700,000 shares are
currently designated as Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
(“Series B
Preferred”) and 550,000 shares are designated as
Series B-1 Preferred Stock (“Series B-1 Preferred”). As
of June 30, 2019, a total of 625,375 shares of Series B
Preferred and 212,402 shares of Series B-1 Preferred were issued
and outstanding.
Our
Board of Directors is empowered, without stockholder approval, to
issue one or more additional series of Preferred Stock with
dividend, liquidation, conversion, voting, or other rights that
could dilute the interest of, or impair the voting power of, our
Common Stockholders. The issuance of an additional series of
Preferred Stock could be used as a method of discouraging, delaying
or preventing a change in control.
We have not paid dividends on our Common Stock, and investors
should consider the potential for us to pay dividends on our Common
Stock as a factor when determining whether to invest in
us.
We have
not paid dividends on our Common Stock and do not anticipate the
declaration of any dividends pertaining to our Common Stock in the
foreseeable future. We intend to retain earnings, if any, to
finance the development and expansion of our business. Our
Board of Directors will determine our future dividend policy at
their sole discretion, and future dividends will be contingent upon
future earnings, if any, obligations of the stock issued, our
financial condition, capital requirements, general business
conditions and other factors. Future dividends may also be
affected by covenants contained in loan or other financing
documents, which we may executed in the future. Therefore,
there can be no assurance that dividends will ever be paid on our
Common Stock.
Our officers and directors have limited liability and
indemnification rights under our organizational documents, which
may impact our results.
Our
officers and directors are required to exercise good faith and high
integrity in the management of our affairs. Our articles of
incorporation and bylaws, however, provide that the officers and
directors shall have no liability to the stockholders for losses
sustained or liabilities incurred which arise from any transaction
in their respective managerial capacities unless they violated
their duty of loyalty, did not act in good faith, engaged in
intentional misconduct or knowingly violated the law, approved an
improper dividend or stock repurchase or derived an improper
benefit from the transaction. As a result, an investor may have a
more limited right to action than he would have had if such a
provision were not present. Our articles of incorporation and
bylaws also require us to indemnify our officers and directors
against any losses or liabilities they may incur as a result of the
manner in which they operate our business or conduct our internal
affairs, provided that the officers and directors reasonably
believe such actions to be in, or not opposed to, our best
interests, and their conduct does not constitute gross negligence,
misconduct or breach of fiduciary obligations.
ITEM 2.
|
PROPERTIES
|
Our
principal place of business operations is located at 5282 South
Commerce Drive, Suite D292, Murray, Utah 84107. We
lease approximately 10,000
square feet at this corporate office location, consisting primarily
of office space, conference rooms and storage areas. Our
telephone number is (435) 645-2000. Our website address is
http://www.parkcitygroup.com.
ITEM 3.
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
|
We are,
from time to time, involved in various legal proceedings incidental
to the conduct of our business. Historically, the outcome of all
such legal proceedings has not, in the aggregate, had a material
adverse effect on our business, financial condition, results of
operations or liquidity. There are no pending or
threatened material legal proceedings at this time.
ITEM 4.
|
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
|
Not
applicable.
PART II
ITEM 5.
|
MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
Share Price History
Our
Common Stock is traded on the NASDAQ Capital Market under the
trading symbol “PCYG.” The following table sets forth
the high and low sales prices of our Common Stock for the
periods indicated.
|
Quarterly Common
Stock Price Ranges
|
|||
|
2019
|
2018
|
||
Fiscal Quarter
Ended
|
High
|
Low
|
High
|
Low
|
September
30
|
$10.33
|
$7.50
|
$14.80
|
$10.80
|
December
31
|
$10.05
|
$5.64
|
$12.50
|
$9.50
|
March
31
|
$8.96
|
$6.19
|
$11.70
|
$8.65
|
June
30
|
$5.19
|
$4.95
|
$9.70
|
$6.75
|
Dividend Policy
Outstanding shares
of Series B Preferred and Series B-1 Preferred each accrue
dividends at the rate per
share of 7% per annum if paid by the Company in cash, and 9% per
annum if paid by the Company in additional shares of Series B-1
Preferred. Dividends on the Series B Preferred and Series B-1
Preferred are payable quarterly. To date, the Company has
not paid dividends on its Common Stock. Our present policy is to
retain future earnings (if any) for use in our operations and the
expansion of our business.
Holders of Record
At June
30, 2019 there were 652 holders
of record of our Common Stock, and 19,793,372 shares were issued and
outstanding, three holders of Series B Preferred and 625,375 shares
issued and outstanding, and four holders of Series B-1 Preferred
and 212,402 shares issued and outstanding. The number of
holders of record and shares of Common Stock issued and outstanding
was calculated by reference to the books and records of the
Company’s transfer agent.
Issuance of Securities
We
issued shares of our Common Stock in unregistered transactions
during fiscal year 2019. All of the shares of Common Stock issued
in non-registered transactions were issued in reliance on Section
3(a)(9) and/or Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act and were
reported in our Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q and in our Current
Reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019. 28,188
shares of Common Stock were issued subsequent to June 30,
2019.
Share Repurchase Program
On May 9, 2019, the Board of the Company approved
the repurchase of up to $4.0 million of the Company’s Common
Stock, par value $0.01 per share, over the next 24 months (the
“Share Repurchase
Program”). The following
table provides information about the repurchases of our Common
Stock registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), from the implementation of the Share Repurchase
Program for the year ended June 30, 2019.
Period (1)
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)
|
Amount
Available for Future Share Repurchases Under the Plans or
Programs
|
May 9, 2019 –
May 31, 2019:
|
17,600
|
$5.65
|
17,600
|
$3,897,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2019
– June 30, 2019:
|
70,000
|
$5.41
|
87,600
|
$3,517,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 9, 2019 –
June 30, 2019:
|
87,600
|
$5.53
|
87,600
|
$3,517,594
|
(1)
We close our books and records on the
last calendar day of each month to align our financial closing with
our business processes.
(2)
On May 9, 2019, our
Board of Directors approved a Share Repurchase Program pursuant to
which we are authorized to repurchase our common stock in privately
negotiated transactions or in the open market at prices per share
not exceeding the then-current market prices. From time to time,
our Board of Directors may authorize increases to our Share
Repurchase Program. The total remaining authorization for future
Common Share repurchases under our Share Repurchase Program was
$3,517,594 as of June 30, 2019. Under the Share Repurchase Program,
management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares
to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance
with applicable laws and regulations, including Rule 12b-18 of the
Exchange Act. The Share Repurchase Program expires 24 months
following May 9, 2019, and it may be suspended for periods or
discontinued at any time.
ITEM 6.
|
SELECTED FINANCIAL
DATA
|
The
disclosures in this section are not required because we qualify as
a smaller reporting company under federal securities
laws.
ITEM 7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION
AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
The following Management’s Discussion
and Analysis is intended to assist the reader in understanding our
results of operations and financial
condition. Management’s Discussion and Analysis is
provided as a supplement to, and should be read in conjunction
with, our audited consolidated financial statements beginning on
page F-1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K (the “Annual
Report”). This Annual
Report includes certain statements that may be deemed to be
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of
Section 27A of the Securities Act. All statements, other than
statements of historical fact, included in this Annual Report that
address activities, events or developments that we expect, project,
believe, or anticipate will or may occur in the future, including
matters having to do with expected and future revenue, our ability
to fund our operations and repay debt, business strategies,
expansion and growth of operations and other such matters, are
forward-looking statements. These statements are based on
certain assumptions and analyses made by our management in light of
its experience and its perception of historical trends, current
conditions, expected future developments, and other factors it
believes are appropriate in the circumstances. These
statements are subject to a number of assumptions, risks and
uncertainties, including general economic and business conditions,
the business opportunities (or lack thereof) that may be presented
to and pursued by us, our performance on our current contracts and
our success in obtaining new contracts, our ability to attract and
retain qualified employees, and other factors, many of which are
beyond our control. You are cautioned that these
forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance
and those actual results or developments may differ materially from
those projected in such statements.
Overview
Park City Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) is a Software-as-a-Service (SaaS)
provider, and the parent company of ReposiTrak Inc., a B2B
e-commerce, compliance, and supply chain management platform that
partners with retailers, wholesalers, and product suppliers to help
them source, vet, and transact with their upstream suppliers in
order to accelerate sales, control risks, and improve supply chain
efficiencies. The Company’s fiscal year ends on June
30. References to fiscal 2019 refer to the fiscal year ended
June 30, 2019.
Sources of Revenue
The principal customers for the Company’s
products are multi-store retail chains, wholesalers and
distributors, and their suppliers. The Company has a hub and spoke
business model. The Company is typically engaged by retailers and
wholesalers (“Hubs”), which in turn require their suppliers
(“Spokes”) to utilize the Company’s
services. The Company derives revenue from five sources: (i)
Subscription Fees, (ii) Transaction Based Fees, (iii) Professional
Services Fees, (iv) License Fees, and (v) Hosting and Maintenance
Fees
A significant portion of the Company’s
revenue is generated from its Supply Chain, Compliance and Food
Safety solutions in the form of recurring subscription payments
from the suppliers. Subscription fees can be based on a
negotiated flat fee per supplier, or some volumetric metric, such
as the number of stores, or the volume of economic activity between
a retailer and its suppliers. Subscription revenue contains
arrangements with customers for use of the application, application
and data hosting, maintenance of the application, and standard
support.
Revenue
from the Company’s MarketPlace sourcing solution is
transactional, based on the volume of products sourced via the
application. MarketPlace revenue can come from several sources
depending on the customer’s specific requirements. These
include acting as an agent for a supplier, providing supply chain
technology services, and enabling a Hub to reduce its number of new
suppliers by acting as the supplier for any number of
products.
The
Company also provides professional consulting services targeting
implementation, assessments, profit optimization and support
functions for its applications and related products, for which revenue is recognized on a
percentage-of-completion or pro rata basis over the life of the
subscription, depending on the nature of the engagement.
Premier customer support includes extended availability and
additional services and is available along with additional support
services such as developer support and partner support for an
addition fee.
In some instances, the Company will sell its
software in the form of a license. License arrangements are
a time-specific and perpetual license. Software license maintenance
agreements are typically annual contracts, paid in advance or
according to terms specified in the contract. When sold as a license, the Company’s
software, is usually accompanied by a corresponding Maintenance
and/or Hosting agreement to support the
service.
Software
maintenance agreements provide the customer with access to new
software enhancements, maintenance releases, patches, updates and
technical support personnel. Our hosting services provide
remote management and maintenance of our software and
customers’ data, which is physically located in third-party
facilities. Customers access ‘hosted’ software and
data through a secure internet connection.
Revenue Recognition
Effective July 1,
2018, we adopted the Financial Accounting Standards Board’s
Accounting Standards Update 2014-09: Revenue from Contracts with Customers
(Topic 606), and its related amendments (“ASU 2014-09”). ASU 2014-09
provides a unified model to determine when and how revenue is
recognized and enhances certain disclosure around the nature,
timing, amount and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising
from customers.
ASU
2014-09 represents a change in the accounting model utilized for
the recognition of revenue and certain expense arising from
contracts with customers. We adopted ASU 2014-09 using a
“modified retrospective” approach and, accordingly,
revenue and expense totals for all periods before July 1, 2018
reflect those previously reported under the prior accounting model
and have not been restated.
See
Note 2 to our audited Consolidated Financial Statements included in
Part I, Item 1 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K
for a full description of the impact of the adoption of new
accounting standards on our financial statements. Following the
adoption of this guidance, the revenue recognition for our sales
arrangements remained materially consistent with our historical
practice and there have been no material changes to our critical
accounting policies and estimates as compared to our critical
accounting policies and estimates included in our Annual Report
on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended June 30,
2018.
Other Metrics – Non-GAAP Financial Measures
To
supplement our financial statements, historically we have provided
investors with Adjusted EBITDA and non-GAAP income per share, both
of which are non-GAAP financial measures. We believe that these
non-GAAP measures may provide useful information regarding certain
financial and business trends relating to our financial condition
and operations. Our management uses these non-GAAP measures to
compare the Company’s performance to that of prior periods
for trend analyses and planning purposes. These measures are also
presented to our Board of Directors.
These
non-GAAP measures should not be considered a substitute for, or
superior to, financial measures calculated in accordance with
generally accepted accounting principles in the United States of
America. These non-GAAP financial measures exclude significant
expenses and income that are required by GAAP to be recorded in the
Company’s financial statements and are subject to inherent
limitations. Investors should review the reconciliations of
non-GAAP financial measures to the comparable GAAP financial
measures that are included in this “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of
Operations.”
Critical Accounting Policies
This
Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
and Results of Operations discusses the Company’s financial
statements, which have been prepared in accordance with GAAP. The
preparation of our financial statements requires management to make
estimates and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets
and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the
reported amount of revenue and expense during the reporting
period.
On an
ongoing basis, management evaluates its estimates and assumptions
based on historical experience of operations and on various other
factors that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances,
the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the
carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily
apparent from other sources. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
Income Taxes
In
determining the carrying value of the Company’s net deferred
income tax assets, the Company must assess the likelihood of
sufficient future taxable income in certain tax jurisdictions,
based on estimates and assumptions, to realize the benefit of these
assets. If these estimates and assumptions change in the future,
the Company may record a reduction in the valuation allowance,
resulting in an income tax benefit in the Company’s
statements of operations. Management evaluates quarterly whether to
realize the deferred income tax assets and assesses the valuation
allowance.
Goodwill and Other Long-Lived Asset Valuations
Goodwill is
assigned to specific reporting units and is reviewed for possible
impairment at least annually or upon the occurrence of an event or
when circumstances indicate that a reporting unit’s carrying
amount is greater than its fair value. Management reviews the
long-lived tangible and intangible assets for impairment when
events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value
of an asset may not be recoverable. Management evaluates, at each
balance sheet date, whether events and circumstances have occurred
which indicate possible impairment.
The
carrying value of a long-lived asset is considered impaired when
the anticipated cumulative undiscounted cash flows of the related
asset or group of assets is less than the carrying value. In that
event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the
carrying value exceeds the estimated fair market value of the
long-lived asset. Economic useful lives of long-lived assets are
assessed and adjusted as circumstances dictate.
Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company recognizes the cost of employee services received in
exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date
fair value of those awards. The Company records compensation
expense on a straight-line basis. The fair value of any options
granted are estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option pricing model with assumptions for the risk-free interest
rate, expected life, volatility, dividend yield and forfeiture
rate.
Capitalization of Software Development Costs
The
Company accounts for research costs of computer software to be
sold, leased or otherwise marketed as expense until technological
feasibility has been established for the product. Once
technological feasibility is established, all software costs are
capitalized until the product is available for general release to
customers. Judgment is required in determining when technological
feasibility of a product is established.
We have
determined that technological feasibility for our software products
is reached shortly after a working prototype is complete and meets
or exceeds design specifications including functions, features, and
technical performance requirements. Costs incurred after
technological feasibility is established have been and will
continue to be capitalized until such time as when the product or
enhancement is available for general release to
customers.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
The
Company does not have any off-balance sheet arrangements that are
reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our
financial condition, revenue and results of operation, liquidity or
capital expenditures.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In
August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) – Customer’s
Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing
Arrangement That is a Service Contract. The amendments in
this update apply to an entity who is a customer in a hosting
arrangement accounted for as a service contract. The update
requires a customer in a hosting arrangement to capitalize certain
implementation costs. Costs associated with the application
development stage of the implementation should be capitalized and
costs with the other stages should be expensed. For instance, costs
for training and data conversion should be expensed. The
capitalized implementation costs should be expensed over the term
of the hosting arrangement, which is the noncancelable period plus
periods covered by an option to extend if the customer is
reasonably certain to exercise the option. Impairment of the
capitalized costs should be considered similar to other
intangibles. The effective date of this update is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 for
public entities and after December 15, 2020 for all other entities
with early adoption permitted. The Company is a customer in a
hosting arrangement and may enter into new arrangements in the
future. The Company will apply the guidance for implementation
costs of new hosting arrangements once adopted.
In
August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13 Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure
Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value
Measurement. This ASU eliminates, amends, and adds
disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The new
standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Although
we are still evaluating the impact of this new standard, we do not
believe that the adoption will materially impact our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and related
disclosures.
In June
2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07 Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic
718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment
Accounting. The amendments in this update expand the scope
of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for
acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. Prior to this
update, equity-based payments to non-employees was accounted for
under Subtopic 505-50 resulting in significant differences between
the accounting for share-based payments to non-employees as
compared to employees. One of the most significant changes is that
non-employee share-based awards (classified as equity awards) may
be measured at grant-date fair value and not have to be continually
revalued until the service/goods are rendered. The update also
indicates that share-based awards related to financing and awards
granted to a customer in conjunction with selling goods or services
are not included in Topic 718. This standard is effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2018 for public entities and December 15, 2019 for all other
entities. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than an
entity’s adoption date of Topic 606. The Company anticipates
this update may impact its financials for any non-employee grants
but the impact is not material.
In May 2014, August 2015, April 2016, May 2016,
September 2017 and November 2017, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09 (ASC Topic
606), Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, ASU 2015-14 (ASC
Topic 606) Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, Deferral of the Effective Date, ASU 2016-10 (ASC Topic
606) Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and
Licensing, ASU 2016-12 (ASC
Topic 606) Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical
Expedients, ASU
2017-14, Income Statement - Reporting
Comprehensive Income (ASC
Topic 606), Revenue
Recognition (ASC Topic
606), and Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (ASC Topic 606):
Amendments to SEC Paragraphs pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 116 and SEC Release No. 33-10403, respectively. ASC Topic 606
outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in
accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and
supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including
industry specific guidance. It also requires entities to disclose
both quantitative and qualitative information that enable financial
statements users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and
uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with
customers. The amendments in these ASUs are effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2016. This standard may be applied
retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or retrospectively
with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings in the year of
adoption. The Company adopted the standard using the modified
retrospective method.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU
2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and
Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment. The amendments
in this update simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill
for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment
test. An entity should apply the amendments in this update on a
prospective basis. The Company notes that this guidance applies to
its reporting requirements and has implement the new guidance
accordingly.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU
2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash
Payments. Historically, there
has been a diversity in practice in how certain cash
receipts/payments are presented and classified in the statement of
cash flows under Topic 230. To reduce the existing diversity in
practice, this update addresses multiple cash flow issues. The
amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company notes that this
guidance applies to its reporting requirements and has implemented
the new guidance accordingly.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (ASC Topic 842),
Leases. The ASU amends a
number of aspects of lease accounting, including requiring lessees
to recognize operating leases with a term greater than one year on
their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease
liability, measured at the present value of the lease payments. The
amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within
those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will
implement the new standard July 2019.
Results of Operations – Fiscal Years Ended June 30, 2019 and
2018
Revenue
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Revenue
|
$21,169,608
|
$(866,670)
|
-4%
|
$22,036,278
|
During
the fiscal year ended June 30, 2019, the Company had revenue of
$21,169,608 compared to $22,036,278 for the year ended June 30,
2018, a 4% decrease. This
$866,670 decrease in total revenue was
driven by lower one-time license sales, professional services
associated with both license and other sales, and a decrease in
MarketPlace transactional revenue. The decrease in one-time license
sales and MarketPlace was partially offset by recurring maintenance
revenue and an increase in recurring subscription
revenue.
With
the adoption of ASC 606, the Company “unbundles” its
service offerings by performance obligation and recognizes revenue
accordingly when or as the obligation is satisfied. This may result
in fluctuations in quarter to quarter comparisons, and that
difference may be material.
Although no
assurances are given, the Company believes that focusing on
recurring subscription revenue and less one-time revenue will
continue to increase its recurring revenue in subsequent periods
primarily due to growth in new customers for the Company’s
Tier 2 initiative, MarketPlace B2B e-commerce services, and
cross-selling existing customers other services.
Cost of Services and Product Support
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Cost of service and
product support
|
$5,830,084
|
$(757,402)
|
-11%
|
$6,587,486
|
Percent of total
revenue
|
28%
|
|
|
30%
|
Cost of
services and product support was $5,830,084 or 28% of total revenue, and $6,587,486 or 30%
of total revenue for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively, an 11%
decrease. This
decrease of $757,402
is primarily attributable
to costs related to lower headcount, stock compensation expense,
and costs related to lower MarketPlace revenue.
Management expects service and a product support to increase in
subsequent periods and notes that new services, while accretive to
earnings, may have a negative impact on gross margin.
Sales and Marketing Expense
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Sales and
marketing
|
$6,006,597
|
$(396,746)
|
-6%
|
$6,403,343
|
Percent of total
revenue
|
28%
|
|
|
29%
|
The
Company’s sales and marketing expense was $6,006,597, or
28% of total revenue, and
$6,403,343, or 29% of total revenue, for the fiscal years ended
June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, a 6% decrease. This decrease in sales and marketing expense is
due to (1) a decrease in commission and other costs associated with
lower revenue, and (2) rationalizing trade shows, marketing
campaigns and other sales spending that were determined to not
yield a return on investment.
Management expects sales and marketing
expense to remain flat in absolute value in subsequent periods, but to fall as a
percentage of total revenue due to inside sales team and automation
of Tier 2 compliance onboarding.
General and Administrative Expense
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
General and
administrative
|
$4,742,205
|
$(152,541)
|
-3%
|
$4,894,746
|
Percent of total
revenue
|
22%
|
|
|
22%
|
The
Company’s general and administrative expense was
$4,742,205, or 22% of total revenue, and $4,894,746 or 22%
of total revenue for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018,
respectively, a 3%
decrease. This
$152,541
decrease
is primarily attributable to
lower rent costs and a decrease in stock-based compensation
expense.
Management expects general and
administrative expense to increase in absolute
value in
subsequent periods, but to fall as a percentage of total revenue as
it benefits from investments in automation and process
optimization.
Depreciation and Amortization Expense
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
$601,433
|
$(32,421)
|
-5%
|
$633,854
|
Percent of total
revenue
|
3%
|
|
|
3%
|
The
Company’s depreciation and amortization expense was
$601,433 and $633,854 for the
years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively, a 5% decrease. This decrease is primarily due to the full
depreciation of computer hardware and software occurring during the
period.
Other Income and Expense
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Other (expense) and
income
|
$55,287
|
$57,958
|
NM
|
$(2,671)
|
Percent of total
revenue
|
<1%
|
|
|
NM
|
Other
income was $ 55,287 compared to expense of $2,671 for the year
ended June 30, 2018. This increase of $57,958 for the year ended
June 30, 2019 when compared to the year ended June 30, 2018 was due
to a higher cash balance and an increase in interest income on that
cash balance due to higher yields, lower fees on equipment
financing, and a loss on a sale of investment, versus the
comparable period a year ago.
Preferred Dividends
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Preferred
dividends
|
$586,443
|
$13,095
|
2%
|
$573,348
|
Percent of total
revenue
|
2%
|
|
|
4%
|
Dividends accrued
on the Company’s Series B Preferred and Series B-1 Preferred
was $586,443 for the year ended
June 30, 2019, compared to dividends accrued on the Series B
Preferred of $573,348 for the year ended June 30, 2018.
This $13,095
increase
was due to
the Company’s decision to begin paying the dividend related
to its Series B-1 Preferred in cash as opposed to shares of Series
B-1 Preferred.
Financial Position, Liquidity and Capital Resources
We
believe our existing cash and short-term investments, together with
funds generated from operations, are sufficient to fund operating
and investment requirements for at least the next twelve months.
Our future capital requirements will depend on many factors,
including our rate of revenue growth and expansion of our sales and
marketing activities, the timing and extent of spending required
for research and development efforts and the continuing market
acceptance of our products.
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Cash and Cash
Equivalents
|
$18,609,423
|
$3,716,984
|
25%
|
$14,892,439
|
Cash
and cash equivalents were $18,609,423 and $14,892,439 at June 30,
2019, and June 30, 2018, respectively, a 25% increase. The $3,716,984 increase during the year ended
June 30, 2019 when compared to the year ended June 30, 2018
is
principally the result of higher gross margins and ongoing
collections.
Net Cash Flows from Operating Activities
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Cash flows provided
by operating activities
|
$4,578,855
|
$2,399,369
|
110
|
$2,179,486
|
Net
cash provided by operating activities is summarized as
follows:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Net
income
|
$3,902,406
|
$3,408,783
|
Noncash expense and
income, net
|
1,663,314
|
1,687,888
|
Net changes in
operating assets and liabilities
|
(986,865)
|
(2,917,185)
|
|
$4,578,855
|
$2,179,486
|
Non-cash expense in
the year ended June 30, 2019 as compared to June 30, 2018 were
essentially flat. Net changes in operating assets and liabilities
were $1,930,320 and were the result of higher collections, a
decrease in accounts payable, and a decrease in overall operating
costs.
Net Cash Flows used in Investing Activities
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Cash flows (used
in) investing activities
|
$(969,996)
|
(654,750)
|
208%
|
$(315,246)
|
Net
cash flows used in investing activities for the year ended June 30,
2019 was $969,996 compared to
net cash flows used in investing activities of $315,246 for the
year ended June 30, 2018. This $654,750 increase in cash used in investing
activities for the year ended June 30, 2019 when compared to the
same period in 2018 was due to the buildout of our new office
space, and infrastructure associated with a new data
center.
Net Cash Flows from Financing Activities
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Cash flows provided
by (used in) financing activities
|
$108,125
|
$1,133,932
|
-111%
|
$(1,025,807)
|
Net
cash provided by financing activities totaled $108,125 for the year ended June 30, 2019
compared to cash flows used in financing activities of $1,025,807
for the year ended June 30, 2018. The increase in net cash related to
financing activities is primarily attributable to
redemption of $1.0
million of the Company’s Series B-1 Preferred
in the prior year.
Liquidity and Working Capital
At June
30, 2019, the Company had positive working capital of $17,746,257, as compared with positive
working capital of $15,743,569 at June 30, 2018. This
$2,002,688 increase in working
capital is principally due to an increase of $3,716,984 in
cash, a
reduction of $960,140 in
accounts payable, a reduction of $477,844 due to the Company’s Share
Repurchase Program, and a reduction of $417,499 in
deferred revenue.
While no assurances can be given,
management currently believes that the Company will continue to
increase its working capital position in subsequent periods and
that projected cash flow from operations, and that it will
have adequate cash resources to fund its operations and satisfy its
debt obligations for at least the next 12 months.
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Current
assets
|
$26,548,874
|
$2,815,413
|
12%
|
$23,733,461
|
Current assets as of June 30, 2019,
totaled $26,548,874,
an increase of $2,815,413 when compared to $23,733,461
as of June 30, 2018. The
increase in current assets is attributable to an increase of $3,716,984 in
cash, offset by a decrease of $478,593 in contract
assets – unbilled current portion, a decrease in accounts
receivable, net allowance of $343,690 and a decrease in
prepaid expense of
$79,288.
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2019
|
$
Change
|
%
Change
|
Year
Ended
June
30, 2018
|
Current
liabilities
|
$8,802,617
|
$812,725
|
10%
|
$7,989,892
|
Current
liabilities totaled $8,802,617
and $7,989,892 as of June 30, 2019, and 2018,
respectively. The
$812,725 comparative increase in current
liabilities is principally due to current portion of notes payable,
offset in part by a decrease of
$960,140 in accounts payable and a decrease in deferred revenue of
$417,499.
While
no assurances can be given, management believes cash resources and
projected cash flow from operations will be sufficient to enable
the Company to fund currently anticipated operations and capital
spending requirements and to address debt service requirements
during the next 12 months without negatively impacting working
capital.
Redemption of Shares of Series B Preferred Stock
On January 27, 2018, the Company’s Board of
Directors approved the redemption of 93,457 of the 305,859 issued
and outstanding shares of the Company’s Series B-1 Preferred
(the “Redemption
Shares”), and on February
6, 2018, the Company delivered a notice to the holders of the
Series B-1 Preferred notifying the holders of the Company’s
intent to redeem the Redemption Shares, on a pro rata basis, on
February 7, 2018 (the “Redemption
Date”) (the
“Series B-1
Redemption”). On the
Redemption Date, the Company paid an aggregate total of $1.0
million to the holders of shares of Series B-1 Preferred for the
redemption of a total of 93,457 shares of Series B-1
Preferred. Following the Series
B-1 Redemption, a total of 212,402 shares of Series B-1 Preferred
remain issued and outstanding.
Contractual Obligations
Total
contractual obligations and commercial commitments as of June 30,
2019, are summarized in the following table:
|
Payment
Due by Year
|
||||
|
Total
|
Less
than
1
Year
|
1-3
Years
|
3-5
Years
|
More
than
5
Years
|
Operating
lease obligations
|
$326,400
|
$122,400
|
$122,400
|
$81,600
|
$
|
|
Payment
Due by Year
|
||||
|
Total
|
Less
than
1
Year
|
1-3
Years
|
3-5
Years
|
More
than
5
Years
|
Capital lease
obligations
|
$1,338,462
|
$349,164
|
$349,164
|
$640,134
|
$
|
Inflation
The
impact of inflation has historically not had a material effect on
the Company’s financial condition or results from operations;
however, higher rates of inflation may cause retailers to slow
their spending in the technology area, which could have an impact
on the Company’s sales.
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE
DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
Each of our contracts require payment in U.S. dollars. We therefore
do not engage in hedging transactions to reduce our exposure to
changes in currency exchange rates, although in the event any
future contracts are denominated in a foreign currency, we may do
so in the future. As a result, our financial results are not
affected by factors such as changes in foreign currency exchange
rates.
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
The
information required hereunder in this Annual Report is set forth
in the financial statements and the notes thereto beginning on Page
F-1.
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
None.
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
|
(a)
|
Evaluation of disclosure controls and procedures.
|
Under
the supervision and with the participation of our Management,
including our principal executive officer and principal financial
officer, we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the
design and operations of our disclosure controls and procedures, as
defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, as of June 30, 2019. Based on
this evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and
procedures are effective to ensure that information required to be
disclosed in the reports submitted under the Securities and
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in SEC
rules and forms, including to ensure that information required to
be disclosed by the Company is accumulated and communicated to
management, including the principal executive officer and principal
financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions
regarding required disclosure.
(b)
|
Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial
Reporting.
|
We are
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f)
under the Exchange Act). Our internal control over financial
reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance
regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of financial statements for external purposes of
accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Therefore, even
those systems determined to be effective can provide only
reasonable assurance of achieving their control
objectives.
Management is
responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal
control over financial reporting for the Company. With our
participation, an evaluation of the effectiveness of our internal
control over financial reporting was conducted as of June 30, 2019,
based on the framework and criteria established in Internal Control
Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring
Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this evaluation,
our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as
of June 30, 2019.
Haynie and Company, our independent registered public
accounting firm, audited our consolidated financial statements
included in this Annual Report, has issued an attestation report on
the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting,
which report is included in Part IV below.
(c)
|
Changes in Internal Controls over Financial
Reporting.
|
Our
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have determined
that there has been no change, in the Company’s internal
control over financial reporting during the period covered by this
report identified in connection with the evaluation described in
the above paragraph that have materially affected, or are
reasonably likely to materially affect, Company’s internal
control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
None.
PART III
ITEM 10.
|
DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
The
information required by this item will be incorporated by reference
from Park City Group, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement, to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before
October 28, 2019.
ITEM 11.
|
EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
|
The
information required by this item will be incorporated by reference
from Park City Group, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement, to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before
October 28, 2019.
ITEM 12.
|
SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND
RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
The
information required by this item will be incorporated by reference
from Park City Group, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement, to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before
October 28, 2019.
ITEM 13.
|
CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
The
information required by this item will be incorporated by reference
from Park City Group, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement, to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before
October 28, 2019.
ITEM 14.
|
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
The
information required by this item will be incorporated by reference
from Park City Group, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement, to
be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on or before
October 28, 2019.
PART IV
ITEM 15.
|
EXHIBITS, FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
Exhibits, Financial Statements and Schedules
Exhibit
Number
|
|
Description
|
|
Articles
of Incorporation (1)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment (2)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment (3)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Amendment (16)
|
|
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws (14)
|
|
|
Certificate
of Designation of the Series B Convertible Preferred Stock
(4)
|
|
|
Fourth
Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of the Relative
Rights, Powers and Preferences of the Series B Preferred Stock of
Park City Group, Inc. (12)
|
|
|
First
Amended and Restated Certificate of Designation of the Relative
Rights, Powers and Preferences of the Series B-1 Preferred Stock of
Park City Group, Inc. (13)
|
|
|
Subordinated
Promissory Note, dated April 1, 2009, issued to Riverview Financial
Corporation (5)
|
|
|
Amendment
to Loan Agreement and Note, by and between U.S. Bank National
Association and the Company, dated September 15, 2009
(6)
|
|
|
Amendment
to Loan Agreement and Note, by and between U.S. Bank National
Association and the Company, dated May 5, 2010
(7)
|
|
|
ReposiTrak
Omnibus Subscription Agreement (8)
|
|
|
ReposiTrak
Promissory Note (8)
|
|
|
Fields
Employment Agreement (10)
|
|
|
Services
Agreement (10)
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement by and between Todd Mitchell and Park City Group, Inc.,
dated September 28, 2015 (11)
|
|
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Employment Agreement, by and between Park City Group,
Inc., Randall K. Fields and Fields Management, Inc., dated July 1,
2016 (15)
|
|
|
Amendment
to Services Agreement (18)
|
|
|
Amendment
to Note, by and between U.S. Bank National Association and the
Company, dated January 9, 2019 (19)
|
|
|
Master
Lease Agreement, dated January 9, 2019 (19)
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement by and between John Merrill and Park City Group, Inc.,
dated May 29, 2019 (20)
|
|
|
Code of
Ethics and Business Conduct (9)
|
|
|
List of
Subsidiaries (17)
|
|
|
Consent
of Haynie & Company, dated September 11, 2019
|
|
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002 *
|
|
|
Certification
of Principal Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes
Oxley Act of 2002 *
|
|
|
Certification
of Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer
pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350 *
|
(1)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form DEF 14C dated June 5, 2002.
|
(2)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 10-QSB for the year ended Sept 30,
2005.
|
(3)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 10-KSB dated September 29,
2006.
|
(4)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated July 21, 2010.
|
(5)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated June 5, 2009.
|
(6)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated September 30,
2009.
|
(7)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated May 6, 2010.
|
(8)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Annual Report on Form 10-K dated September
23, 2013.
|
(9)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 10-KSB dated September 29,
2008.
|
(10)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 10-K dated September 11,
2014.
|
(11)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated September 30,
2015.
|
(12)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated January 14, 2016.
|
(13)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated January 14, 2016.
|
(14)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated October 21, 2016.
|
(15)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 10-Q dated November 7,
2016.
|
(16)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated July 28, 2017.
|
(17)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 10-K dated September 13,
2017.
|
(18)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 10-Q dated May 10, 2018.
|
(19)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated January 15, 2019.
|
(20)
|
Incorporated
by reference from our Form 8-K dated May 31, 2019.
|
*
|
Filed
herewith
|
SIGNATURES
In accordance
with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the registrant caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned,
thereunto duly authorized.
|
PARK CITY GROUP, INC.
|
|
(Registrant)
|
Date:
September 12, 2019
|
By: /s/
Randall K. Fields
|
|
Principal
Executive Officer,
Chairman
of the Board and Director
|
In
accordance with the Exchange Act, this report has been signed below
by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
|
|
|
/s/ Randall
K. Fields
|
Chairman
of the Board and Director,
|
September
12, 2019
|
Randall
K. Fields
|
Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
/s/ John
Merrill
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
September
12, 2019
|
John
Merrill
|
(Principal
Financial Officer &
Principal
Accounting Officer)
|
|
/s/ Robert W. Allen
|
Director,
and Compensation
|
September
12, 2019
|
Robert
W. Allen
|
Committee
Chairman
|
|
/s/ William S.
Kies, Jr.
|
Director
|
September
12, 2019
|
William
S. Kies, Jr.
|
|
|
/s/ Peter J.
Larkin
|
Director
|
September
12, 2019
|
Peter
J. Larkin
|
|
|
/s/ Ronald C.
Hodge
|
Director,
and Audit Committee Chairman
|
September
12, 2019
|
Ronald
C. Hodge
|
|
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and
Stockholders
of Park City Group, Inc.
Opinion on the Financial Statements
We have
audited the accompanying balance sheets of Park City Group, Inc.
and Subsidiaries (the Company) as of June 30, 2019 and 2018,
and the related statements of income, comprehensive income,
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for each of the years in
the two-year period ended June 30, 2019, and the related notes
(collectively referred to as the financial statements). In our
opinion, the financial statements present fairly, in all material
respects, the financial position of the Company as of June 30, 2019
and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended June 30, 2019, in
conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the
United States of America.
We also have
audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the
Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission
(COSO), and our report dated September 12, 2019, expressed
an unqualified opinion.
Basis for Opinion
These
financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s
management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the
Company’s financial statements based on our audits. We are a
public accounting firm registered with the PCAOB and are required
to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with
the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and
regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the
PCAOB.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements
are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of
material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to
error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those
risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis,
evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the financial
statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting
principles used and significant estimates made by management, as
well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial
statements. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis
for our opinion.
Haynie
& Company
Salt
Lake City, Utah
September
12, 2019
We have
served as the Company’s auditor since 2016.
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING
FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and
Stockholders
of Park City Group, Inc.
Opinion on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
We have
audited Park City Group, Inc. and Subsidiaries’ (the
Company’s) internal control over financial reporting as of
June 30, 2019, based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission (COSO). In our opinion, the Company
maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control
over financial reporting as of June 30, 2019, based on criteria
established in Internal
Control—Integrated Framework (2013) issued by
COSO.
We also have
audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB), the balance
sheets and the related statements of income, comprehensive income,
stockholders’ equity, and cash flows of the Company, and our
report dated September 12, 2019, expressed
an unqualified opinion.
Basis for Opinion
The
Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective
internal control over financial reporting, and for its assessment
of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting,
included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on
Internal Control. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on
the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based
on our audit. We are a public accounting firm registered with the
PCAOB and are required to be independent with respect to the
Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the
applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange
Commission and the PCAOB.
We
conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB.
Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to
obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal
control over financial reporting was maintained in all material
respects. Our audit of internal control over financial reporting
included obtaining an understanding of internal control over
financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating
effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our
audit also included performing such other procedures as we
considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our
audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Definition and Limitations of Internal Control over Financial
Reporting
A
company’s internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control
over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures
that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and
dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable
assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally
accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures
of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3)
provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely
detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the
company’s assets that could have a material effect on the
financial statements.
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial
reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also,
projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods
are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because
of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the
policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Haynie
& Company
Salt
Lake City, Utah
September
12,
2019
PARK CITY GROUP,
INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
Assets
|
June
30,
2019
|
June
30,
2018
|
Current
Assets
|
|
|
Cash
|
$18,609,423
|
$14,892,439
|
Receivables, net of
allowance for doubtful accounts of $145,825 and $153,220 at June 30, 2019 and
2018, respectively
|
3,878,658
|
4,222,348
|
Contract asset
– unbilled current portion
|
3,023,694
|
3,502,287
|
Prepaid expense and
other current assets
|
1,037,099
|
1,116,387
|
|
|
|
Total
Current Assets
|
26,548,874
|
23,733,461
|
|
|
|
Property
and equipment, net
|
2,972,257
|
1,896,348
|
|
|
|
Other
Assets:
|
|
|
Deposits, and other
assets
|
17,146
|
18,691
|
Contract asset
– unbilled long-term portion
|
1,659,110
|
1,194,574
|
Investments
|
-
|
477,884
|
Customer
relationships
|
788,400
|
919,800
|
Goodwill
|
20,883,886
|
20,883,886
|
Capitalized
software costs, net
|
70,864
|
168,926
|
|
|
|
Total
Other Assets
|
23,419,406
|
23,663,761
|
|
|
|
Total
Assets
|
$52,940,537
|
$49,293,570
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and Shareholders’ Equity
|
|
|
Current
liabilities
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
$530,294
|
$1,490,434
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
1,399,368
|
745,694
|
Contract liability
- deferred revenue
|
1,917,787
|
2,335,286
|
Lines of
credit
|
4,660,000
|
3,230,000
|
Current portion of
notes payable
|
295,168
|
188,478
|
|
|
|
Total
current liabilities
|
8,802,617
|
7,989,892
|
|
|
|
Long-term
liabilities
|
|
|
Notes payable, less
current portion
|
920,754
|
1,592,077
|
Other long-term
liabilities
|
-
|
7,275
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities
|
9,723,371
|
9,589,244
|
|
|
|
Commitments
and contingencies
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’
equity:
|
|
|
Preferred
Stock; $0.01 par value, 30,000,000 shares authorized;
|
|
|
Series
B Preferred, 700,000 shares authorized; 625,375 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2019 and 2018;
|
6,254
|
6,254
|
Series
B-1 Preferred, 550,000 shares authorized; 212,402 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively
|
2,124
|
2,124
|
Common Stock, $0.01
par value, 50,000,000 shares authorized; 19,793,372 and 19,773,549 issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively
|
197,936
|
197,738
|
Additional paid-in
capital
|
76,908,566
|
76,711,887
|
Accumulated
deficit
|
(33,897,714)
|
(37,213,677)
|
|
|
|
Total
stockholders’ equity
|
43,217,166
|
39,704,326
|
|
|
|
Total
liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
$52,940,537
|
$49,293,570
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
PARK CITY GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
|
For
the Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
|
|
|
Revenue
|
$21,169,608
|
$22,036,278
|
|
|
|
Operating
expense:
|
|
|
Cost of revenue and
product support
|
5,830,084
|
6,587,486
|
Sales and
marketing
|
6,006,597
|
6,403,343
|
General and
administrative
|
4,742,205
|
4,894,746
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
601,433
|
633,854
|
Total operating
expense
|
17,180,319
|
18,519,429
|
|
|
|
Income from
operations
|
3,989,289
|
3,516,849
|
|
|
|
Other
income:
|
|
|
Interest
Income
|
247,059
|
164,217
|
Interest
expense
|
(42,684)
|
(166,888)
|
Gain (loss) on
disposition of investment
|
(148,548)
|
-
|
|
|
|
Income before
income taxes
|
4,045,116
|
3,514,178
|
|
|
|
(Provision) for
income taxes
|
(142,710)
|
(105,395)
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
3,902,406
|
3,408,783
|
|
|
|
Dividends on
Preferred Stock
|
(586,443)
|
(573,348)
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
applicable to common shareholders
|
$3,315,963
|
$2,835,435
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
shares, basic
|
19,849,000
|
19,581,000
|
Weighted average
shares, diluted
|
20,368,000
|
20,280,000
|
Basic earnings
(loss) per share
|
$0.17
|
$0.14
|
Diluted earnings
(loss) per share
|
$0.16
|
$0.14
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity
(Deficit)
|
Series
B
Preferred
Stock
|
Series
B-1
Preferred
Stock
|
Common
Stock
|
Additional
Paid-In
|
Accumulated
|
|
|||
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Deficit
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, June 30,
2017
|
625,375
|
$6,254
|
285,859
|
$2,859
|
19,423,821
|
$194,241
|
$75,489,189
|
$(39,983,692)
|
$35,708,851
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued
for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
compensation
|
-
|
-
|
20,000
|
200
|
136,160
|
1,361
|
1,247,149
|
-
|
1,248,710
|
Cash
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
27,018
|
270
|
244,147
|
-
|
244,417
|
Preferred
Dividends-Declared
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(573,348)
|
(573,348)
|
Exercise of
Option/Warrant
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
186,550
|
1,866
|
665,037
|
-
|
666,903
|
Redemption
|
-
|
-
|
(93,457)
|
(935)
|
-
|
-
|
(933,635)
|
(65,420)
|
(999,990)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,408,783
|
3,408,783
|
Balance, June 30,
2018
|
625,375
|
$6,254
|
212,402
|
$2,124
|
19,773,549
|
$197,738
|
$76,711,887
|
$(37,213,677)
|
$39,704,326
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock issued
for:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued
compensation
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
55,274
|
552
|
452,276
|
-
|
452,828
|
Cash
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
26,568
|
266
|
154,409
|
-
|
154,675
|
Preferred
Dividends-Declared
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(586,443)
|
(586,443)
|
Exercise of
Option/Warrant
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
25,581
|
256
|
164,741
|
-
|
164,997
|
Redemption
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(93,217)
|
-
|
(93,217)
|
Stock
Buyback
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(87,600)
|
(876)
|
(481,530)
|
-
|
(482,406)
|
Net
income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3,902,406
|
3,902,406
|
Balance, June 30,
2019
|
625,375
|
6,254
|
212,402
|
2,124
|
19,793,372
|
197,936
|
76,908,566
|
(33,897,714)
|
43,217,166
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
PARK CITY GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
|
For
the Years Ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Cash flows from
operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
income
|
$3,902,406
|
$3,408,783
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating
activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation and
amortization
|
601,433
|
633,854
|
Stock compensation
expense
|
551,881
|
588,984
|
Bad debt
expense
|
510,000
|
465,050
|
Decrease (increase)
in:
|
|
|
Trade
receivables
|
312,283
|
(4,180,558)
|
Long-term
receivables, prepaids and other assets
|
(383,703)
|
854,239
|
Increase (decrease)
in:
|
|
|
Accounts
payable
|
(960,140)
|
924,947
|
Accrued
liabilities
|
462,194
|
(500,253)
|
Deferred
revenue
|
(417,499)
|
(15,560)
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided
by operating activities
|
4,578,855
|
2,179,486
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities:
|
|
|
Purchase
of property and equipment
|
(1,447,880)
|
(204,005)
|
Capitalization of software costs
|
-
|
(111,241)
|
Sale of long-term investments
|
477,884
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net
cash used in investing activities
|
(969,996)
|
(315,246)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
financing activities:
|
|
|
Proceeds
from employee stock purchase plans
|
-
|
244,417
|
Proceeds
from exercises of options and warrants
|
164,997
|
666,903
|
Proceeds from issuance of note payable
|
1,268,959
|
56,078
|
Net
increase in lines of credit
|
1,430,000
|
380,000
|
Redemption
of Series B-1 Preferred
|
-
|
(999,990)
|
Dividends
paid
|
(439,833)
|
(782,123)
|
Common
stock buy-back
|
(482,406)
|
-
|
Payments
on notes payable and capital leases
|
(1,833,592)
|
(591,092)
|
|
|
|
Net
cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
108,125
|
(1,025,807)
|
|
|
|
Net increase in
cash and cash equivalents
|
3,716,984
|
838,433
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of period
|
14,892,439
|
14,054,006
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of period
|
$18,609,423
|
$14,892,439
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Cash Flow Information
|
|
|
Cash paid for
income taxes
|
$76,063
|
$75,714
|
Cash paid for
interest
|
$146,889
|
$166,888
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
Disclosure of Non-Cash Investing and Financing
Activities
|
|
|
Preferred Stock to
pay accrued liabilities
|
$-
|
$200,000
|
Common Stock to pay
accrued liabilities
|
$514,286
|
$1,048,710
|
Dividends accrued
on Preferred Stock
|
$586,443
|
$573,532
|
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial
statements.
PARK CITY GROUP, INC. AND
SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
June 30, 2019 and June 30, 2018
NOTE 1.
|
DESCRIPTION OF BUSINESS
|
Summary of Business
Park City Group, Inc. (the
“Company”) is a Software-as-a-Service
(“SaaS”) provider, and the parent company of ReposiTrak
Inc., which operates a business-to-business
(“B2B”) e-commerce, compliance, and supply chain
management platform that partners with retailers, wholesalers, and
product suppliers to help them source, vet, and transact with their
suppliers in order to accelerate sales, control risks, and improve
supply chain efficiencies. The Company is incorporated in the state
of Nevada and has three principal subsidiaries: PC Group, Inc., a
Utah corporation (98.76% owned); Park City Group, Inc., a Delaware
corporation (100% owned); and ReposiTrak, Inc., a Utah corporation
(100% owned). All intercompany transactions and balances have been
eliminated in the Company’s consolidated financial
statements, which contain the operating results of the
operations of Park City Group, Inc. (Delaware) and ReposiTrak, Inc.
Park City Group, Inc. (Nevada) has no business
operations separate from the operations conducted
through its subsidiaries.
NOTE 2.
|
SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
|
Principles of Consolidation
The
financial statements presented herein reflect the consolidated
financial position of Park City Group, Inc. and our subsidiaries.
All inter-company transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use of Estimates
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with
U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that materially affect the
amounts reported in the consolidated financial statements. Actual
results could differ from these estimates. The methods, estimates,
and judgments the Company uses in applying its most critical
accounting policies have a significant impact on the results it
reports in its financial statements. The Securities and Exchange
Commission has defined the most critical accounting policies as
those that are most important to the portrayal of the
Company’s financial condition and results and require the
Company to make its most difficult and subjective judgments, often
because of the need to make estimates of matters that are
inherently uncertain. Based on this definition, the Company’s
most critical accounting policies include revenue recognition,
goodwill, other long-lived asset valuations, income taxes,
stock-based compensation, and capitalization of software
development costs.
Concentration of Credit Risk and Significant Customers
The
Company maintains cash in bank deposit accounts, which, at times,
may exceed federally insured limits. The Company has not
experienced any losses in such accounts and believes it is not
exposed to any significant credit risk on cash and cash
equivalents. Financial instruments,
which potentially subject the Company to concentration of credit
risk, consist primarily of trade receivables. In the normal course
of business, the Company provides credit terms to its customers.
Accordingly, the Company performs ongoing evaluations of its
customers and maintains allowances for possible losses. The
provision is based on the overall composition of our accounts
receivable aging, our prior history of accounts receivable
write-offs, and our experience with specific
customers.
Other
factors indicating significant risk include customers that have
filed for bankruptcy or customers for which we have less payment
history to rely upon. We rely on historical trends of bad debt as a
percentage of total revenue and apply these percentages to the
accounts receivable which when realized have been within the range
of management’s expectations. The Company does not require
collateral from its customers.
The
Company’s accounts receivable are derived from sales of
products and services primarily to customers operating
multilocation retail and grocery stores. The Company writes off
accounts receivable when they are determined to be uncollectible.
Changes in the allowances for doubtful accounts are recorded as bad
debt expense and are included in general and administrative expense
in our consolidated financial statements. Amounts that have been
invoiced are recorded in accounts receivable (current and
long-term), and in deferred revenue or revenue, depending on
whether the revenue recognition criteria have been
met.
The
Company had one customer that accounted for greater than 10% of
accounts receivable at June 30, 2019. Customer A had a balance of
$886,174 and $1,288,980, for June 30,2019 and June 30, 2018,
respectively.
Prepaid Expense and Other Current Assets
Prepaid
expense and other current assets include amounts for which payment
has been made but the services have not yet been consumed. The
Company’s prepaid expense is made up primarily of prepayments
for hosted software applications used in the Company’s
operations, maintenance agreements on hardware and software, and
other miscellaneous amounts for insurance, membership fees and
professional fees. Prepaid expense is amortized on a pro-rata
basis to expense accounts as the services are consumed typically by
the passage of time or as the service is used.
Depreciation
and Amortization
Depreciation and
amortization of property and equipment is computed using the
straight-line method based on the following estimated useful
lives:
|
Years
|
Furniture and
fixtures
|
5-7
|
Computer
equipment
|
3
|
Equipment under
capital leases
|
3
|
Long-term use
equipment
|
10
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
See
below
|
Leasehold
improvements are amortized over the shorter of the remaining lease
term or the estimated useful life of the improvements.
Amortization of
intangible assets are computed using the straight-line method based
on the following estimated useful lives:
|
Years
|
Customer
relationships
|
10
|
Acquired developed
software
|
5
|
Developed
software
|
3
|
Goodwill
|
See
below
|
Goodwill and
intangible assets deemed to have indefinite lives are subject to
annual impairment tests. Other intangible assets are amortized over
their useful lives.
Warranties
The
Company offers a limited warranty against software defects.
Customers who are not completely satisfied with their software
purchase may attempt to be reimbursed for their purchases outside
the warranty period. For the years ending June 30, 2019 and 2018,
the Company did not incur any expense associated with warranty
claims.
Adoption of ASC Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with
Customers”
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards
Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09, “Revenue from
Contracts with Customers” (“ASC 606”). ASC 606 clarifies the accounting for
revenue arising from contracts with customers and specifies the
disclosures that an entity should include in its financial
statements. During 2016, the FASB issued certain amendments to the
standard relating to the principal versus agent guidance,
accounting for licenses of intellectual property identifying
performance obligations as well as the guidance on transition,
collectability, noncash consideration and the presentation of sales
and other similar taxes. We adopted ASC 606 using the modified
retrospective method on July 1, 2018.
The
effect of applying ASC 606 did not result in an opening balance
adjustment to retained earnings or any other balance sheet accounts
because the Company: (1) identified similar performance obligations
under ASC 606 as compared with deliverables and separate units of
account previously identified; (2) determined the transaction price
to be consistent; and (3) concluded that revenue is recorded at the
same point in time, upon performance under both ASC 605 and ASC
606. The adoption of ASC 606 did not require significant changes in
our internal controls and procedures over financial reporting and
disclosures. However, we made enhancements to existing internal
controls and procedures to ensure compliance with the new
guidance.
Revenue Recognition
The Company
recognizes revenue as it transfers
control of deliverables (products, solutions and services) to its
customers in an amount reflecting the consideration to which it
expects to be entitled. To recognize revenue, the Company applies
the following five step approach: (1) identify the contract with a
customer, (2) identify the performance obligations in the contract,
(3) determine the transaction price, (4) allocate the transaction
price to the performance obligations in the contract, and (5)
recognize revenue when a performance obligation is
satisfied. The Company accounts
for a contract based on the terms and conditions the parties agree
to, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of
consideration is probable. The Company applies judgment in
determining the customer’s ability and intention to pay,
which is based on a variety of factors including the
customer’s historical payment experience.
The
Company may enter into arrangements
that consist of multiple performance obligations. Such arrangements
may include any combination of its deliverables. To the extent a
contract includes multiple promised deliverables, the
Company applies judgment to determine
whether promised deliverables are capable of being distinct and are
distinct in the context of the contract. If these criteria are not
met, the promised deliverables are accounted for as a combined
performance obligation. For arrangements with multiple distinct
performance obligations, the Company allocates consideration among
the performance obligations based on their relative standalone
selling price. Standalone selling price is the price at which the
Company would sell a promised good or service separately to the
customer. When not directly observable, the Company typically
estimates standalone selling price by using the expected cost plus
a margin approach. The Company typically establishes a standalone selling price
range for its deliverables, which is reassessed on a periodic basis
or when facts and circumstances change.
For
performance obligations where control is transferred over time,
revenue is recognized based on the extent of progress towards
completion of the performance obligation. The selection of the
method to measure progress towards completion requires judgment and
is based on the nature of the deliverables to be provided. Revenue
related to fixed-price contracts for application development and
systems integration services, consulting or other technology
services is recognized as the service is performed using the output
method, under which the total value of revenue is recognized based
on each contract’s deliverable(s) as they are completed and
when value is transferred to a customer. Revenue related to
fixed-price application maintenance, testing and business process
services is recognized based on our right to invoice for services
performed for contracts in which the invoicing is representative of
the value being delivered, in accordance with the practical
expedient in ASC 606-10-55-18.
If
the Company’s invoicing is not consistent with the value
delivered, revenue is recognized as the service is performed based
on the method described above. The output method measures the
results achieved and value transferred to a customer, which is
updated as the project progresses to reflect the latest available
information; such estimates and changes in estimates involve the
use of judgment. The cumulative impact of any revision in estimates
is reflected in the financial reporting period in which the change
in estimate becomes known and any anticipated losses on contracts
are recognized immediately. Revenue related to fixed-price hosting
and infrastructure services is recognized based on the
Company’s right to invoice for services performed for
contracts in which the invoicing is representative of the value
being delivered, in accordance with the practical expedient in ASC
606-10-55-18. If the Company’s invoicing is not consistent
with value delivered, revenue is recognized on a straight-line
basis unless revenue is earned and obligations are fulfilled in a
different pattern. The revenue recognition method applied to the
types of contracts described above provides the most faithful
depiction of performance towards satisfaction of the
Company’s performance obligations.
Revenue
related to the Company’s software license arrangements that
do not require significant modification or customization of the
underlying software is recognized when the software is delivered as
control is transferred at a point in time. For software license
arrangements that require significant functionality enhancements or
modification of the software, revenue for the software license and
related services is recognized as the services are performed in
accordance with the methods described above. In software hosting
arrangements, the rights provided to the customer, such as
ownership of a license, contract termination provisions and the
feasibility of the client to operate the software, are considered
in determining whether the arrangement includes a license or a
service. Revenue related to software maintenance and support is
generally recognized on a straight-line basis over the contract
period.
Revenue
related to transaction-based or volume-based contracts is
recognized over the period the services are provided in a manner
that corresponds with the value transferred to the customer to-date
relative to the remaining services to be provided.
From
time to time, the Company may enter into arrangements with third
party suppliers to resell products or services. In such cases, the
Company evaluates whether the Company is the principal (i.e. report
revenue on a gross basis) or agent (i.e. report revenue on a net
basis). In doing so, the Company first evaluates whether it
controls the good or service before it is transferred to the
customer. If the Company controls the good or service before it is
transferred to the customer, the Company is the principal; if not,
the Company is the agent. Determining whether the Company controls
the good or service before it is transferred to the customer may
require judgment.
The
Company provides customers with assurance that the related
deliverable will function as the parties intended because it
complies with agreed-upon specifications. General updates or patch
fixes are not considered an additional performance obligation in
the contract.
Variable
consideration is estimated using either the sum of probability
weighted amounts in a range of possible consideration amounts
(expected value), or the single most likely amount in a range of
possible consideration amounts (most likely amount), depending on
which method better predicts the amount of consideration to which
we may be entitled. The Company includes in the transaction price
variable consideration only to the extent it is probable that a
significant reversal of revenue recognized will not occur when the
uncertainty associated with the variable consideration is resolved.
The Company’s estimates of variable consideration and
determination of whether to include estimated amounts in the
transaction price may involve judgment and is based largely on an
assessment of its anticipated performance and all information that
is reasonably available to the Company.
The
Company assesses the timing of the
transfer of goods or services to the customer as compared to the
timing of payments to determine whether a significant financing
component exists. As a practical expedient, the Company does not
assess the existence of a significant financing component when the
difference between payment and transfer of deliverables is a year
or less. If the difference in timing arises for reasons other than
the provision of finance to either the customer or us, no financing
component is deemed to exist. The primary purpose of the
Company’s invoicing terms is to provide customers with
simplified and predictable ways of purchasing its services, not to
receive or provide financing from or to customers. The
Company does not consider set up or
transition fees paid upfront by its customers to represent a
financing component, as such fees are required to encourage
customer commitment to the project and protect us from early
termination of the contract.
Trade Accounts Receivable and Contract Balances
We
classify our right to consideration in exchange for deliverables as
either a receivable or a contract asset (unbilled receivable). A
receivable is a right to consideration that is unconditional (i.e.
only the passage of time is required before payment is due). For
example, we recognize a receivable for revenue related to our
transaction or volume-based contracts when earned regardless of
whether amounts have been billed. We present such receivables in
trade accounts receivable, net in our consolidated statements of
financial position at their net estimated realizable value. We
maintain an allowance for doubtful accounts to provide for the
estimated amount of receivables that may not be collected. The
allowance is based upon an assessment of customer creditworthiness,
historical payment experience, the age of outstanding receivables,
judgment, and other applicable factors.
A
contract asset is a right to consideration that is conditional upon
factors other than the passage of time. Contract assets are
presented in current and other assets in our consolidated balance
sheets and primarily relate to unbilled amounts on fixed-price
contracts utilizing the output method of revenue recognition. The
table below shows movements in contract assets:
|
Contract assets
|
Balance –
June 30, 2018
|
$4,696,861
|
Revenue
recognized during the period but not billed
|
3,544,122
|
Amounts
reclassified to accounts receivable
|
(3,558,184)
|
Other
|
-
|
Balance –
June 30, 2019
|
$4,682,799(1)
|
(1)
|
Contract asset balances for June 30, 2019 include a current and a
long-term contract asset, $3,023,694, and $1,659,110
respectively.
|
Our
contract assets and liabilities are reported in a net position at
the end of each reporting period. The difference between the
opening and closing balances of our contract assets and deferred
revenue primarily results from the timing difference between our
performance obligations and the customer’s payment. We
receive payments from customers based on the terms established in
our contracts, which may vary generally by contract
type.
The
table below shows movements in the deferred revenue balances
(current and noncurrent) for the period:
|
Contract liability
|
Balance – June 30, 2018
|
$2,335,286
|
Amounts
billed but not recognized as revenue
|
66,525
|
Revenue
recognized related to the opening balance of deferred
revenue
|
(484,024)
|
Other
|
-
|
Balance – June 30, 2019
|
$1,917,787
|
Our
contract assets and liabilities are reported in a net position on a
contract by contract basis at the end of each reporting period. The
difference between the opening and closing balances of our contract
assets and deferred revenue primarily results from the timing
difference between our performance obligations and the
customer’s payment. We receive payments from customers based
on the terms established in our contracts, which may vary generally
by contract type.
Disaggregation of Revenue
The
table below presents disaggregated revenue from contracts with
customers by customer geography and contract-type. We believe this
disaggregation best depicts the nature, amount, timing and
uncertainty of our revenue and cash flows that may be affected by
industry, market and other economic factors:
|
For the Year Ended June 30, 2019
|
|||
Geography
|
Subscription
& support
|
Professional
services
|
Transaction
based
|
Total
|
North
America
|
$16,159,572
|
$2,055,968
|
$2,893,675
|
$21,109,215
|
International
|
-
|
-
|
60,393
|
60,393
|
Total
|
$16,159,572
|
$2,055,968
|
$2,954,068
|
$21,169,608
|
Software Development Costs
The
Company accounts for research costs of computer software to be
sold, leased or otherwise marketed as expense until technological
feasibility has been established for the product. Once
technological feasibility is established, the company will
occasionally capitalize software costs until the product is
available for general release to customers. In these instances, the
Company determines technological feasibility for its software
products to have been reached when a working prototype is complete
and meets or exceeds design specifications including functions,
features, and technical performance requirements.
During
the 2019 and 2018 fiscal years, capitalized development costs of
zero and $65,505, respectively,
were amortized into expense. The Company amortizes its developed
and purchased software on a straight-line basis over three and five
years, respectively.
Research and Development Costs
Research and
development costs include personnel costs, engineering, consulting,
and contract labor and are expensed as incurred for software that
has not achieved technological feasibility.
Advertising Costs
Advertising is
expensed as incurred. Advertising costs were approximately
$90,546 and $107,656 for the
years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
Income Taxes
The
Company recognizes deferred tax liabilities and assets for the
expected future tax consequences of temporary differences between
tax bases and financial reporting bases of other assets and
liabilities.
Earnings Per Share
Basic
net income per common share (“Basic EPS”) excludes dilution and
is computed by dividing net income applicable to common
shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares
outstanding during the period. Diluted net income per common share
(“Diluted EPS”)
reflects the potential dilution that could occur if stock options
or other contracts to issue shares of Common Stock were exercised
or converted into Common Stock. The computation of Diluted EPS does
not assume exercise or conversion of securities that would have an
antidilutive effect on net income per Common Share.
For the
year ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 warrants to purchase 1,108,805 and 1,185,549 shares of Common
Stock, respectively, were included in the computation of diluted
EPS due to the anti-dilutive effect. Warrants to purchase
shares of Common Stock were outstanding at prices ranging
$4.00 from to $10.00 per share at June 30,
2019.
The
following table presents the components of the computation of basic
and diluted earnings per share for the periods
indicated:
|
Year
ended June 30,
|
|
|
2019
|
2018
|
Numerator
|
|
|
Net income
applicable to common shareholders
|
$3,315,963
|
$2,835,435
|
|
|
|
Denominator
|
|
|
Weighted average
common shares outstanding, basic
|
19,849,000
|
19,581,000
|
Warrants to
purchase Common Stock
|
519,000
|
699,000
|
|
|
|
Weighted average
common shares outstanding, diluted
|
20,368,000
|
20,280,000
|
|
|
|
Net income per
share
|
|
|
Basic
|
$0.17
|
$0.14
|
Diluted
|
$0.16
|
$0.14
|
Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company recognizes the cost of employee services received in
exchange for awards of equity instruments based on the grant-date
fair value of those awards. The Company records compensation
expense on a straight-line basis. The fair value of options
granted are estimated at the date of grant using a Black-Scholes
option pricing model with assumptions for the risk-free interest
rate, expected life, volatility, dividend yield and forfeiture
rate.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
The
Company considers all highly liquid investments purchased with an
original maturity of twelve months or less to be cash equivalents.
Cash and cash equivalents are stated at fair value.
Marketable Securities
Management
determines the appropriate classification of marketable securities
at the time of purchase and reevaluates such determination at each
balance sheet date. Securities are classified as available for sale
and are carried at fair value, with the change in unrealized gains
and losses, net of tax, reported as a separate component on the
consolidated statements of comprehensive income. Fair value is
determined based on quoted market rates when observable or
utilizing data points that are observable, such as quoted prices,
interest rates and yield curves. The cost of securities sold
is based on the specific-identification method. Interest on
securities classified as available for sale is also included as a
component of interest income.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company’s financial instruments consist of cash, cash
equivalents, receivables, payables, accruals and notes
payable. The carrying amount of cash, cash equivalents,
receivables, payables and accruals approximates fair value due to
the short-term nature of these items. The notes payable also
approximate fair value based on evaluations of market interest
rates.
Reclassifications
There
were no reclassifications.
NOTE 3.
|
INVESTMENTS
|
As of
June 30, 2019, the Company sold its investment resulting in a
$148,548 loss on disposition of investment. Previously the Company
had a 36% ownership in a privately held corporation.
Investee companies
that are not consolidated, but over which the Company exercises
significant influence, are accounted for under the equity method of
accounting. Whether or not the Company exercises significant
influence with respect to an investee depends on an evaluation of
several factors including, among others, representation on the
investee company’s board of directors and ownership level,
which is generally a 20% to 50% interest in the voting securities
of the investee company.
Under
the equity method of accounting, an investee company’s
accounts are not reflected within the Company’s consolidated
balance sheet and statements of operations; however, the
Company’s share of the earnings or losses of the investee
company is reflected in the consolidated statements of operations.
The Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee
company is reflected in the caption
‘‘Investments’’ in the Company’s
consolidated balance sheet.
When
the Company’s carrying value in an equity method investee
company is reduced to zero, no further losses are recorded in the
Company’s consolidated financial statements unless the
Company guaranteed obligations of the investee company or has
committed additional funding. When the investee company
subsequently reports income, the Company will not record its share
of such income until it equals the amount of its share of losses
not previously recognized.
NOTE 4.
|
RECEIVABLES
|
Accounts receivable
consist of the following:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Accounts
receivable
|
$7,048,177
|
$7,877,855
|
Allowance for
doubtful accounts
|
(145,825)
|
(153,220)
|
|
$6,902,352
|
$7,724,635
|
Accounts receivable
consist of trade accounts receivable and unbilled amounts
recognized as revenue during the year for which invoicing occurs
subsequent to year-end. Amounts that have been invoiced are
recorded in accounts receivable and in deferred revenue or revenue,
depending on whether the revenue recognition criteria have been
met.
NOTE 5.
|
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
|
Property and
equipment are stated at cost and consist of the following at June
30:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Computer
equipment
|
$3,678,638
|
$2,920,180
|
Furniture and
equipment
|
1,833,074
|
1,703,586
|
Leasehold
improvements
|
805,769
|
245,835
|
|
6,317,481
|
4,869,601
|
Less accumulated
depreciation and amortization
|
(3,345,224)
|
(2,973,253)
|
|
$2,972,257
|
$1,896,348
|
Depreciation
expense for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was
$371,972 and $422,933,
respectively.
NOTE 6.
|
CAPITALIZED SOFTWARE COSTS
|
Capitalized
software costs consist of the following at June 30:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Capitalized
software costs
|
$2,737,312
|
$2,737,312
|
Less accumulated
amortization
|
(2,666,448)
|
(2,568,386)
|
|
$70,864
|
$168,926
|
Amortization
expense for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was
$98,061and $79,521,
respectively.
NOTE 7.
|
ACQUISITION RELATED INTANGIBLE ASSETS, NET
|
Customer
relationships consist of the following at June 30:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Customer
relationships
|
$5,537,161
|
$5,537,161
|
Less accumulated
amortization
|
(4,748,761)
|
(4,617,361)
|
|
$788,400
|
$919,800
|
Amortization
expense for the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 was
$131,400 and $131,400,
respectively.
Estimated aggregate
amortization expense per year are as follows:
Years ending June
30:
|
|
2020
|
$131,400
|
2021
|
$131,400
|
2022
|
$131,400
|
2023
|
$131,400
|
Thereafter
|
$394,200
|
NOTE 8.
|
ACCRUED LIABILITIES
|
Accrued
liabilities consist of the following at June 30, 2019 and
2018:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Accrued stock-based
compensation
|
$275,359
|
$347,971
|
Accrued
compensation
|
503,578
|
300,571
|
Accrued other
liabilities
|
222,238
|
(199,564)
|
Accrued
taxes
|
253,832
|
298,965
|
Accrued
dividends
|
144,361
|
(2,249)
|
|
$1,399,368
|
$745,694
|
NOTE 9.
|
NOTES PAYABLE
|
The
Company had the following notes payable obligations at June 30,
2019 and 2018:
Notes
Payable:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Note payable to an
entity, due in monthly installments of $0 bearing interest at 4.00%
due July 1, 2019, secured by long-term investments.
|
-
|
312,456
|
Note payable to a
bank, due in quarterly installments of $53,996 bearing interest at
4.21% balloon payment of $800,000 due July 28, 2022, secured by
related capital equipment, NBV of approximately
$1,550,000
|
-
|
1,467,599
|
Note payable to a
bank, due in monthly installments of $29,097 bearing interest at
4.99% due April 1, 2023 secured by related capital
equipment
|
1,215,922
|
-
|
|
$1,215,922
|
$1,780,555
|
Less current
portion notes payable
|
(295,168)
|
(188,478)
|
|
$920,754
|
$1,592,077
|
Maturities of notes
payable at June 30, 2019 are as follows:
Year
ending June 30:
|
|
2020
|
$295,168
|
2021
|
$310,242
|
2022
|
$326,087
|
2023
|
$284,425
|
Thereafter
|
$-
|
NOTE 10.
|
LINES OF CREDIT
|
On January 9, 2019, the
Company and U.S. Bank N.A. (the “Bank”)
entered into an amendment (the “Amendment”)
to the outstanding Stand-Alone Revolving Note, preferred
accompanying addendum. Pursuant to the Amendment, the parties
agreed to (i) extend the maturity date to December 31, 2019;
(ii) increase the maximum amount the Company is able to borrow
under the Note to $6,000,000; (iii) increase the interest rate to
1.75% per annum plus the greater of zero percent or one-month
LIBOR, (iv) convert the Note from a secured instrument to an
unsecured instrument; provided,
however, that the Company must maintain liquid assets equal
to the outstanding balance of the Note, and (v) to add a provision
requiring the Company to maintain a Senior Funded Debt to EBITDA
Ratio, as such terms are defined in the Amendment, of not more than
2:1.
The
line of credit, as amended, is scheduled to mature on December 31,
2019. The balance on the line of credit was $4,660,000 and $3,230,000 at June 30, 2019
and June 30, 2018, respectively.
NOTE 11.
|
DEFERRED REVENUE
|
Deferred revenue
consisted of the following at June 30:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Subscription
|
$1,606,985
|
$2,056,796
|
Other
|
310,802
|
278,490
|
|
$1,917,787
|
$2,335,286
|
NOTE 12.
|
INCOME TAXES
|
Deferred taxes are provided on a liability method
whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary
differences and operating loss and tax credit carry forwards and
deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable
differences. Temporary differences are the differences
between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their
tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a
valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more
likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets
will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and
liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and
rates on the date of enactment. Due to the tax rates being changed
in 2018 we have used a federal and state blended rate of
26%.
Net
deferred tax liabilities consist of the following components at
June 30:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Deferred
tax assets:
|
|
|
NOL
Carryover
|
$29,234,200
|
31,664,500
|
Allowance
for Bad Debts
|
37,900
|
39,800
|
Accrued
Expenses
|
55,700
|
70,400
|
Deferred
Revenue
|
-
|
-
|
Depreciation
|
(641,800)
|
(274,500)
|
Amortization
|
(277,300)
|
(337,000)
|
|
|
|
Valuation
allowance
|
(28,408,700)
|
(31,163,200)
|
Net
deferred tax asset
|
-
|
$-
|
The
income tax provision differs from the amounts of income tax
determined by applying the US federal income tax rate to pretax
income from continuing operations for the years ended June 30, 2019
and 2018 due to the following:
|
2019
|
2018
|
Book
Income
|
$1,039,326
|
1,107,856
|
Stock
for Services
|
26,078
|
(88,504)
|
Change
in accrual
|
(14,727)
|
(216,453)
|
Life
Insurance
|
17,626
|
26,438
|
Meals
& Entertainment
|
10,939
|
9,562
|
Change
in Allowance
|
(1,923)
|
(77,685)
|
Change
in Depreciation
|
(477,179)
|
(248,647)
|
NOL
Utilization
|
(600,140)
|
(512,567)
|
Valuation
allowance
|
|
|
|
-
|
$-
|
At
June 30, 2019, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of
approximately $112,439,000 that may be offset against past and
future taxable income from the year 2018 through 2036. A
significant portion of the net operating loss carryforwards begin
to expire in 2019. No tax benefit has been reported in
the June 30, 2019 consolidated financial statements since the
potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the
same amount.
Due
to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of
1986, net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax
reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. In January of
2009 the Company acquired Prescient Applied Intelligence, Inc.
which had significant net operating loss carry-forwards. Due to the
change in ownership, Prescient's net operating loss carryforwards
may be limited as to use in future years. The limitation will be
determined on a year-to-year basis. In June of 2015 the Company
acquired Repositrak, Inc. which had significant net operating loss
carryforwards. Due to the change in ownership, Repositrak's net
operating loss carryforwards may be limited as to use in future
years. The limitation will be determined on a year to year
basis.
The
Company determines whether it is more likely than not that a tax
position will be sustained upon examination based upon the
technical merits of the position. If the
more-likely-than-not threshold is met, the Company measures the tax
position to determine the amount to recognize in the financial
statements. The Company performed a review of its
material tax positions in accordance with these recognition and
measurement standards.
The Company has concluded that there are no
significant uncertain tax positions requiring disclosure, and there
are not material amounts of unrecognized tax
benefits.
The
Company includes interest and penalties arising from the
underpayment of income taxes in the consolidated statements of
operations in the provision for income taxes. As of June
30, 2019, the Company had no accrued interest or penalties related
to uncertain tax positions.
NOTE 13.
|
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
|
Leases
On May
1, 2019, the Company completed the expansion of new equipment for
the Company’s information technology infrastructure, buildout
of its corporate headquarters, and expansion of its collocation
data center, which it completed using approximately $1,269,000 (the
“Lease Amount”) of funds provided by the Bank to
finance equipment and services related to the Company’s
expansion and relocation pursuant to the Lease Agreement,
originally entered into by and between the Company and the Bank on
January 9, 2019. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement, as of May 1,
2019, the Bank is now leasing back the property and equipment
purchased by the Company. Pursuant to the Lease Agreement,
commencing May 1, 2019, the initial term of the lease shall be 48
months, the Lease Amount shall accrue interest at a rate of 5.0%
per annum, and the Company shall be required to make monthly rental
payments in the amount of approximately $29,097 per
month.
On June
21, 2018 the Company entered into an office lease at 5252 South
Commerce Drive Suite D292, Murray, Utah 84107, providing for the
lease of approximately 9,800 square feet for a period of three
years, commencing on March 1, 2019. The monthly rent is
$10,200.
Minimum
future payments, including principal and interest, under the
non-cancelable capital leases are as follows:
Year ending June
30:
|
|
2020
|
$471,564
|
2021
|
$471,564
|
2022
|
$430,764
|
2023
|
$290,970
|
2024
|
$
|
From
time to time the Company may enter into or exit from diminutive
operating lease agreements for equipment such as copiers, temporary
back up servers, etc. These leases are not of a material amount and
thus will not in the aggregate have a material adverse effect on
our business, financial condition, results of operation or
liquidity.
NOTE 14.
|
EMPLOYEE BENEFIT PLAN
|
The
Company offers an employee benefit plan under Benefit Plan Section
401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code. Employees who have
attained the age of 18 are eligible to participate. The
Company, at its discretion, may match employee’s
contributions at a percentage determined annually by the Board of
Directors. The Company does not currently match
contributions. There were no expenses for the years ended June
30, 2019 and 2018.
NOTE 15.
|
STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
|
Officers and Directors Stock Compensation
Effective October
2018, the Board of Directors approved the following compensation
for directors who are not employed by the Company:
●
Annual
cash compensation of $75,000 payable at the rate of $18,750 per
quarter. The Company has the right to pay this amount in the form
of shares of the Company’s Common Stock.
●
Upon
appointment, outside independent directors receive a grant of
$150,000 payable in shares of the Company’s restricted Common
Stock calculated based on the market value of the shares of Common
Stock on the date of grant. The shares vest ratably over a
five-year period.
●
Reimbursement
of all travel expense related to performance of Directors’
duties on behalf of the Company.
Officers, Key Employees, Consultants and Directors Stock
Compensation.
In
January 2013, the Board of Directors approved the Second Amended
and Restated 2011 Stock Plan (the “Amended 2011 Plan”), which
Amended 2011 Plan was approved by shareholders on March 29,
2013. Under the terms of the Amended 2011 Plan, all employees,
consultants and directors of the Company are eligible to
participate. The maximum aggregate number of shares of Common
Stock that may be granted under the 2011 Plan was increased from
250,000 shares to 550,000 shares. On November 9, 2017, the Company
amended the Amended 2011 Plan to increase the maximum aggregate
number of shares from 550,000 shares to 675,000
shares.
A
Committee of independent members of the Company’s Board of
Directors administers the 2011 Plan. The exercise price for
each share of Common Stock purchasable under any incentive stock
option granted under the 2011 Plan shall be not less than 100% of
the fair market value of the Common Stock, as determined by the
stock exchange on which the Common Stock trades on the date of
grant. If the incentive stock option is granted to a
shareholder who possesses more than 10% of the Company’s
voting power, then the exercise price shall be not less than 110%
of the fair market value on the date of grant. Each option
shall be exercisable in whole or in installments as determined by
the Committee at the time of the grant of such options. All
incentive stock options expire after 10 years. If the
incentive stock option is held by a shareholder who possesses more
than 10% of the Company's voting power, then the incentive stock
option expires after five years. If the option holder is
terminated, then the incentive stock options granted to such holder
expire no later than three months after the date of
termination. For option holders granted incentive stock
options exercisable for the first time during any fiscal year and
in excess of $100,000 (determined by the fair market value of the
shares of Common Stock as of the grant date), the excess shares of
Common Stock shall not be deemed to be purchased pursuant to
incentive stock options.
During
the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018 the Company issued
34,382 and 27,880 shares to its
directors and 81,842 and
127,161 shares to employees and consultants, respectively under
these plans. The Company, under its Common Stock buyback plan
purchased 87,600 shares. Those shares were cancelled and returned
to authorized but unissued shares. The Company holds no Treasury
Stock. 31,078 and 119,597,
respectively are included in the rollforward of Restricted Stock
units below.
Restricted Stock Units
|
Restricted
Stock Units
|
Weighted
Average Grant Date Fair Value ($/share)
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at July
1, 2017
|
982,613
|
6.01
|
Granted
|
23,085
|
10.50
|
Vested and
issued
|
(119,597)
|
7.38
|
Forfeited
|
(28,487)
|
10.96
|
Outstanding at June
30, 2018
|
857,614
|
$6.46
|
Granted
|
62,962
|
6.05
|
Vested and
issued
|
(31,078)
|
10.77
|
Forfeited
|
(23,224)
|
10.03
|
Outstanding at June
30, 2019
|
866,274
|
5.47
|
The
number of restricted stock units outstanding at June 30, 2019
included 23,915 units that have vested but for which shares of
Common Stock had not yet been issued pursuant to the terms of the
agreement.
As of
June 30, 2019, there was approximately $4.7 million of unrecognized stock-based
compensation expense under our equity compensation plans, which is
expected to be recognized on a straight-line basis over a weighted
average period of 3.51
years.
Warrants
Outstanding
warrants were issued in connection with private placements of the
Company’s Common Stock and with the Series B Preferred
Restructure. The following table summarizes information about fixed
stock warrants outstanding at June 30, 2019:
|
Warrants
Outstanding
at
June 30, 2019
|
Warrants
Exercisable
at
June 30, 2019
|
|||
Range
of
exercise
prices
|
Number
Outstanding
|
Weighted
average
remaining
contractual life (years)
|
Weighted
average exercise price
|
Number
exercisable
|
Weighted
average
exercise
price
|
$4.00
|
1,085,068
|
0.60
|
$4.00
|
1,085,068
|
$4.00
|
$10.00
|
23,737
|
$0.57
|
10.00
|
$23,737
|
10.00
|
|
1,108,805
|
0.60
|
$4.13
|
1,108,85
|
$4.13
|
Preferred Stock
The
Company’s articles of incorporation currently authorizes the
issuance of up to 30,000,000 shares of ‘blank check’
preferred stock with designations, rights, and preferences as may
be determined from time to time by the Company’s Board of
Directors, of which 700,000 shares are currently designated as
Series B Preferred Stock (“Series B Preferred”) and 550,000
shares are designated as Series B-1 Preferred Stock
(“Series B-1
Preferred”). Both classes of Series B
Preferred Stock pay dividends at a rate of 7% per annum if paid by
the Company in cash, or 9% if paid by the Company in PIK Shares;
the Company may elect to pay accrued dividends on outstanding
shares of Series B Preferred in either cash or by the issuance of
additional shares of Series B Preferred (“PIK Shares”).
The
Company does business with some of the largest retailers and
wholesalers in the World. Management believes the Series B-1
Preferred favorably impacts the Company’s overall cost of
capital in that it is: (i) perpetual and, therefore, an equity
instrument that positively impacts the Company’s coverage
ratios, (ii) possesses a below market dividend rate relative to
similar instruments, (iii) offers the flexibility of a paid-in-kind
(PIK) payment option, and (iv) is without covenants. After
exploring alternative options for redeeming the Series B-1
Preferred, management determined that alternative financing options
were materially more expensive, or would impair the Company’s
net cash position, which management believes could cause customer
concerns and negatively impact the Company’s ability to
attract new business.
Section 4 of the Company’s First Amended and
Restated Certificate of Designation of the Relative Rights, Powers
and Preferences of the Series B-1 Preferred Stock, as amended (the
“Series B-1
COD”) provides the
Company’s Board of Directors with the right to redeem any or
all of the outstanding shares of the Company’s Series B-1
Preferred for a cash payment of $10.70 per share at any time upon
providing the holders of Series B-1 Preferred at least ten days
written notice that sets forth the date on which the redemption
will occur (the “Redemption
Notice”).
In
July 2017, the Company issued 20,000 shares of Series B-1 Preferred
in satisfaction of an accrued bonus payable to the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer.
On January 27, 2018, the Company’s Board of
Directors approved the redemption of 93,457 of the 305,859 issued
and outstanding shares of the Company’s Series B-1 Preferred
(the “Redemption
Shares”), and on February
6, 2018, the Company delivered a Redemption Notice to the holders
of the Series B-1 Preferred notifying the holders of the
Company’s intent to redeem the Redemption Shares, on a pro
rata basis, on February 7, 2018 (the “Redemption
Date”) (the
“Series B-1
Redemption”). On the
Redemption Date, the Company paid an aggregate total of $1.0
million to the holders of shares of Series B-1 Preferred for the
redemption of a total of 93,457 shares of Series B-1
Preferred. Following the Series
B-1 Redemption, a total of 212,402 shares of Series B-1 Preferred
remain issued and outstanding.
As of
June 30, 2019, a total of 625,375 shares of Series B Preferred and
212,402 shares of Series B-1 Preferred were issued and
outstanding.
Share Repurchase Program
As previously disclosed on May 9, 2019, the Board
of the Company approved the repurchase of up to $4.0 million of the
Company’s stock, par value $0.01 per share, over the next 24
months (the “Share Repurchase
Program”). The following
table provides information about the repurchases of our Common
Stock registered pursuant to Section 12 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (“Exchange Act”), from the implementation of the Share Repurchase
Program for the year ended June 30, 2019.
Period (1)
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid Per Share
|
Total Number of Shares Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans or Programs (2)
|
Amount
Available for Future Share Repurchases Under the Plans or
Programs
|
May 9, 2019 –
May 31, 2019:
|
17,600
|
$5.65
|
17,600
|
$3,897,659
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1, 2019
– June 30, 2019:
|
70,000
|
$5.41
|
87,600
|
$3,517,594
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 9, 2019 –
June 30, 2019:
|
87,600
|
$5.53
|
87,600
|
$3,517,594
|
(1)
We close our books and records on the
last calendar day of each month to align our financial closing with
our business processes.
(2)
On May 9, 2019, our
Board of Directors approved a Share Repurchase Program pursuant to
which we are authorized to repurchase our Common Stock in privately
negotiated transactions or in the open market at prices per share
not exceeding the then-current market prices. From time to time,
our Board of Directors may authorize increases to our Share
Repurchase Program. The total remaining authorization for future
common share repurchases under our Share Repurchase Program was
$3,517,594 as of June 30, 2019. Under the Share Repurchase Program,
management has discretion to determine the dollar amount of shares
to be repurchased and the timing of any repurchases in compliance
with applicable laws and regulations, including Rule 12b-18 of the
Exchange Act. The Share Repurchase Program expires 24 months
following May 9, 2019, and it may be suspended for periods or
discontinued at any time.
NOTE 16.
|
RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS
|
In
August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15 Intangibles – Goodwill and Other
Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-40) – Customer’s
Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing
Arrangement That is a Service Contract. The amendments in
this update apply to an entity who is a customer in a hosting
arrangement accounted for as a service contract. The update
requires a customer in a hosting arrangement to capitalize certain
implementation costs. Costs associated with the application
development stage of the implementation should be capitalized and
costs with the other stages should be expensed. For instance, costs
for training and data conversion should be expensed. The
capitalized implementation costs should be expensed over the term
of the hosting arrangement, which is the noncancelable period plus
periods covered by an option to extend if the customer is
reasonably certain to exercise the option. Impairment of the
capitalized costs should be considered similar to other
intangibles. The effective date of this update is effective for
annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019 for
public entities and after December 15, 2020 for all other entities
with early adoption permitted. The Company is a customer in a
hosting arrangement and may enter into new arrangements in the
future. The Company will apply the guidance for implementation
costs of new hosting arrangements once adopted.
In
August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13 Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820) Disclosure
Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value
Measurement. This ASU eliminates, amends, and adds
disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. The new
standard is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15,
2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. Although
we are still evaluating the impact of this new standard, we do not
believe that the adoption will materially impact our Condensed
Consolidated Financial Statements and related
disclosures.
In June
2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-07 Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic
718), Improvements to Nonemployee Share-Based Payment
Accounting. The amendments in this update expand the scope
of Topic 718 to include share-based payment transactions for
acquiring goods and services from nonemployees. Prior to this
update, equity-based payments to non-employees was accounted for
under Subtopic 505-50 resulting in significant differences between
the accounting for share-based payments to non-employees as
compared to employees. One of the most significant changes is that
non-employee share-based awards (classified as equity awards) may
be measured at grant-date fair value and not have to be continually
revalued until the service/goods are rendered. The update also
indicates that share-based awards related to financing and awards
granted to a customer in conjunction with selling goods or services
are not included in Topic 718. This standard is effective for
interim and annual reporting periods beginning after December 15,
2018 for public entities and December 15, 2019 for all other
entities. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than an
entity’s adoption date of Topic 606. The Company anticipates
this update may impact its financials for any non-employee grants
but the impact is not material.
In May 2014, August 2015, April 2016, May 2016,
September 2017 and November 2017, the Financial Accounting
Standards Board (“FASB”) issued ASU 2014-09 (ASC Topic
606), Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, ASU 2015-14 (ASC
Topic 606) Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, Deferral of the Effective Date, ASU 2016-10 (ASC Topic
606) Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, Identifying Performance Obligations and
Licensing, ASU 2016-12 (ASC
Topic 606) Revenue from Contracts with
Customers, Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical
Expedients, ASU
2017-14, Income Statement - Reporting
Comprehensive Income (ASC
Topic 606), Revenue
Recognition (ASC Topic
606), and Revenue from Contracts with
Customers (ASC Topic 606):
Amendments to SEC Paragraphs pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin
No. 116 and SEC Release No. 33-10403, respectively. ASC Topic 606
outlines a single comprehensive model for entities to use in
accounting for revenue arising from contracts with customers and
supersedes most current revenue recognition guidance, including
industry specific guidance. It also requires entities to disclose
both quantitative and qualitative information that enable financial
statements users to understand the nature, amount, timing, and
uncertainty of revenue and cash flows arising from contracts with
customers. The amendments in these ASUs are effective for fiscal
years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after
December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted for annual periods
beginning after December 15, 2016. This standard may be applied
retrospectively to all prior periods presented, or retrospectively
with a cumulative adjustment to retained earnings in the year of
adoption. The Company adopted the standard using the modified
retrospective method.
In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU
2017-04, Intangibles—Goodwill and
Other (Topic 350), Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment. The amendments
in this update simplify how an entity is required to test goodwill
for impairment by eliminating Step 2 from the goodwill impairment
test. An entity should apply the amendments in this update on a
prospective basis. The Company notes that this guidance applies to
its reporting requirements and has implement the new guidance
accordingly.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU
2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic
230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash
Payments. Historically, there
has been a diversity in practice in how certain cash
receipts/payments are presented and classified in the statement of
cash flows under Topic 230. To reduce the existing diversity in
practice, this update addresses multiple cash flow issues. The
amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal
years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company notes that this
guidance applies to its reporting requirements and has implemented
the new guidance accordingly.
In
February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02 (ASC Topic 842),
Leases. The ASU amends a
number of aspects of lease accounting, including requiring lessees
to recognize operating leases with a term greater than one year on
their balance sheet as a right-of-use asset and corresponding lease
liability, measured at the present value of the lease payments. The
amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within
those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted. The Company will
implement the new standard July 2019. The Company anticipates this
update may impact its financials for but the impact is not
material.
.
NOTE 17.
|
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
|
Service Agreement. During
the year ended June 30, 2019, the Company continued to be a party
to a Service Agreement with Fields Management, Inc.
(“FMI”),
pursuant to which FMI provided certain executive management
services to the Company, including designating Mr. Fields to
perform the functions of President and Chief Executive Officer for
the Company. Mr. Fields, FMI’s designated Executive, who also
serves as the Company’s Chairman of the Board of Directors,
controls FMI. The Company had payables of zero and $316,539 to FMI at June 30, 2019
and 2018 respectively, under the Service Agreement. In addition,
during the years ended June 30, 2019 and 2018, zero shares and 20,000 shares of Series B-1
Preferred were paid to FMI in satisfaction of an accrued bonus
payable to Mr. Fields, respectively.
Randall
K. Fields and Robert W. Allen each beneficially own Series B-1
Preferred. As a result of the Series B-1 Redemption, the Company
paid an aggregate of $0 and $889,159 to Messrs. Fields and Allen,
respectively, in consideration for the redemption of 0 and 83,099
shares of Series B-1 Preferred. See Note 15.
NOTE 18.
|
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
|
In accordance with the Subsequent Events Topic of the FASB ASC 855,
we have evaluated subsequent events, through the filing date
and noted no subsequent events that are reasonably likely to
impact the financial statements.
F-22