PARKERVISION INC - Quarter Report: 2020 June (Form 10-Q)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C.  20549



FORM 10-Q

(Mark One)



For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2020



For the transition period from ________to____________



Commission file number 000-22904



PARKERVISION, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)





9446 Philips Highway,  Suite 5A 

Jacksonville,  Florida 32256    

(Address of principal executive offices)



(904)  732-6100

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)



N/A

(Former name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last report)



Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:





Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  Yes ☒   No ☐ .



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically every Interactive Data File required to be submitted  pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit such file).  Yes ☒   No ☐ .



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, smaller reporting company, or an emerging growth company.  See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” “smaller reporting company,” and “emerging growth company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act:





If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act.  ☐



Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).   Yes ☐   No ☒



As of August  12,  2020,  49,812,954 shares of the issuer’s common stock, $.01 par value, were outstanding. 

 

---

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS









 

---

 

PART I - FINANCIAL INFORMATION



ITEM 1.  Financial Statements (Unaudited)



PARKERVISION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except par value data)











---

 

PARKERVISION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands, except per share data)



 



 

---

 

PARKERVISION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF SHAREHOLDERS’ DEFICIT

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)















---

 

PARKERVISION, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(UNAUDITED)

(in thousands)







 



 

---

 

PARKERVISION, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(UNAUDITED)



1.  Description of Business



ParkerVision, Inc. and its wholly-owned German subsidiary, ParkerVision GmbH (collectively “ParkerVision”, “we” or the “Company”) is in the business of innovating fundamental wireless technologies and products.



We have designed and developed proprietary radio frequency (“RF”) technologies and integrated circuits for use in wireless communication products. We have expended significant financial and other resources to research and develop our RF technologies and to obtain patent protection for those technologies in the United States of America (“U.S.”) and certain foreign jurisdictions. We believe certain patents protecting our proprietary technologies have been broadly infringed by others and therefore the primary focus of our business plan is the enforcement of our intellectual property rights through patent infringement litigation and licensing efforts. We currently have patent enforcement actions ongoing in various U.S. district courts against mobile handset and smart television providers  and, in certain cases, their chip suppliers for the infringement of several of our RF patents.  We have made significant investments in developing and protecting our technologies, the returns on which are dependent upon the generation of future revenues for realization.



We also designed, developed and marketed a distributed WiFi product line under the brand name Milo®.  We restructured our operations in 2018 to reduce operating expenses in light of our limited capital resources.  Accordingly, we significantly reduced our ongoing investment in the Milo products.  In early 2019, we ceased substantially all ongoing research and development efforts and, where applicable, repurposed resources to support our patent enforcement and product sales and support efforts.  We ceased sales of our Milo products in the fourth quarter of 2019 and are currently focused exclusively on our patent enforcement litigation and licensing efforts.

 

2.  Liquidity and Going Concern



Our accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements were prepared assuming we would continue as a going concern, which contemplates that we will continue in operation for the foreseeable future and will be able to realize assets and settle liabilities and commitments in the normal course of business for a period of at least one year from the issuance date of these condensed consolidated financial statements.  These condensed consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments to reflect the possible future effects on the recoverability and classification of assets or the amounts and classification of liabilities that could result should we be unable to continue as a going concern.



We have incurred significant losses from operations and negative cash flows from operations in every year since inception and have utilized the proceeds from the sales of debt and equity securities and contingent funding arrangements with third-parties to fund our operations, including the cost of litigation.  For the six months ended June 30, 2020, we incurred a net loss of approximately $11.5 million and negative cash flows from operations of approximately $3.0 million.  At June 30, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of approximately $0.5 million, a working capital deficit of approximately $4.6 million and an accumulated deficit of approximately $413.3 million.  These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue to operate as a going concern for a period of one year following the issue date of these condensed consolidated financial statements.



---

 

For the six months ended June 30, 2020, we received aggregate net proceeds from debt and equity financings of approximately $3.8 million and proceeds from the exercise of outstanding warrants of approximately $0.9 million.  In addition, we repaid approximately $0.7 million in short-term debt and other accrued expenses through the use of shares of our common stock.  Despite these funding efforts, our resources are not sufficient to meet our short-term liquidity needs and we will be required to seek additional capital. 



Our ability to meet our liquidity needs for the next twelve months is dependent upon (i) our ability to successfully negotiate licensing agreements and/or settlements relating to the use of our technologies by others in excess of our contingent payment obligations and (ii) our ability to obtain additional debt or equity financing.  We expect that proceeds received by us from patent enforcement actions and technology licenses over the next twelve months may not be sufficient to cover our working capital requirements.  In the event we do not generate revenues, or other patent-related proceeds, sufficient to cover our operational costs and contingent repayment obligations, we will be required to raise additional working capital through the sale of equity securities or other financing arrangements.    



In July, we received aggregate net proceeds of $0.2 million from the sale of equity securities with contingent payment rights to our patent enforcement proceeds, if any.  We are exploring additional financing opportunities for both our short and long-term capital needs.  These financing opportunities may include debt, convertible debt, common or preferred equity offerings, or a combination thereof.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to consummate a financing transaction or that the terms of such financing will be on terms and conditions that are acceptable.    



We expect to continue to invest in the support of our patent enforcement and licensing programs.  The long-term continuation of our business plan is dependent upon the generation of sufficient revenues from our technologies and/or products to offset expenses and contingent payment obligations.  In the event that we do not generate sufficient revenues, we will be required to obtain additional funding through public or private debt or equity financing or contingent fee arrangements and/or reduce operating costs.  Failure to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital through debt or equity financings or contingent fee arrangements, and/or reduce operating costs will have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our long-term liquidity needs and achieve our intended long-term business objectives.

 

3.  Basis of Presentation 



The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements for the period ended June 30,  2020 were prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Rule 10-01 of Regulation S-X.  Operating results for the three and six months ended June 30,  2020 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2020 or future years.  Certain reclassifications have been made to prior period amounts to conform to the current period presentation.  All normal and recurring adjustments which, in the opinion of management, are necessary for a fair statement of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations have been included.



The year-end condensed consolidated balance sheet data was derived from audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2019, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP.  These interim condensed consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with our latest Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2019 (“2019 Annual Report”).



The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of ParkerVision, Inc. and its wholly-owned German subsidiary, ParkerVision GmbH, after elimination of all intercompany transactions and accounts.  

---

 

 

4.  Accounting Policies



There have been no changes in accounting policies from those stated in our 2019 Annual Report.  We do not expect any newly effective accounting standards to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows when they become effective.

 

5.  Loss per Common Share



Basic loss per common share is determined based on the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during each period.  Diluted loss per common share is the same as basic loss per common share as all common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation, as their effect is anti-dilutive.



We have shares underlying outstanding options, warrants, unvested RSUs and convertible notes that were excluded from the computation of diluted loss per share as their effect would have been anti-dilutive.  These common share equivalents at June 30, 2020 and 2019 were as follows (in thousands):









 

6.  Prepaid Expenses



Prepaid expenses consist of the following (in thousands):



  

Prepaid services include approximately $0.2 million and $0.1 million of consulting services paid in shares of stock or warrants to purchase shares of stock in the future at June 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, respectively.

 

---

 

7.  Intangible Assets



Intangible assets consist of the following (in thousands):



 



8. Operating Lease Right-of-Use Assets



For the six months ended June 30, 2020, we recognized an impairment loss of approximately $0.2 million on the right-of-use asset related to our Lake Mary office lease.  We ceased use of this facility in 2018 as part of our restructuring of operation.  The value of our right-of-use asset included estimated future sublease income.  Due to a number of factors, including the high vacancy rate of the building in which the space is located and the current COVID-19 environment, we determined securing a sublease for the space would be unlikely.  Accordingly, we recognized an impairment loss, which represented the remaining carrying value of the asset as of June 30, 2020.   The impairment is included in selling, general, and administrative expenses in our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss.



9. Debt



Notes Payable



Related Party Note Payable

We have an unsecured promissory note of approximately $0.8 million payable to Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein, & Fox, PLLC (“SKGF”), a related party, for outstanding unpaid fees for legal services.  The SKGF note, as amended, accrues interest at a rate of 4% per annum, requires repayments of principal and interest at a rate of $10,000 per month with a final balloon payment due in April 2022.  We are currently in compliance with all the terms of the note, as amended.  



Secured Note Payable

We have a note payable to Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. (“Mintz”) for outstanding, unpaid attorney’s fees and costs associated with our patent enforcement program. The Mintz note is non-interest bearing, except in the event of a default, and is secured by certain of our U.S. and foreign patents. The note, at Mintz’s option, accelerates and becomes immediately due and payable in the case of standard events of default and/or in the event of a sale or other transfer of substantially all of our assets or a transfer of more than 50% of our capital stock in one or a series of transactions or through a merger or other similar transaction.



We have been in default on the payment terms of the note since November 17, 2019, and accordingly, have accrued interest at the default rate of 12% per annum.  Currently, Mintz has not requested acceleration of unpaid principal and interest on the note, nor have they waived the outstanding default. During the six months ended June 30, 2020, we made payments to Mintz of $1.2 million, which we applied to outstanding principal and interest on the Mintz note, leaving an outstanding balance, including accrued default interest, at June 30, 2020 of approximately $0.02 million.  Mintz disputes our application of payments against principal and interest on the note rather than against the $3.1 million in billed and unpaid fees and expenses payable to Mintz included in accounts payable at June 30, 2020.  The unpaid fees and expenses payable to Mintz at June 30, 2020 exclude approximately $3.6 million in fees billed by

---

 

Mintz that are in excess of agreed-upon fee caps.  We consider the excess fees to be a loss contingency that is not probable as of the issuance date of these condensed consolidated financial statements and, accordingly, we have not recognized these excess fees in expense for the period ended June 30, 2020.   We are in discussions with Mintz to resolve our outstanding fee dispute with regard to amounts billed and payable as well as any success fees payable on potential future proceeds.



Unsecured Notes Payable

Unsecured notes payable at June 30, 2020 represents the current portion of our Paycheck Protection Program loan, as described more fully below.  Unsecured notes payable at December 31, 2019 represents the outstanding principal balance of unsecured short-term promissory notes with accredited investors for aggregate proceeds of approximately $0.23 million. The notes, as amended, accrued interest at a rate of 20% per annum.  During the six months ended June 30, 2020, we issued an aggregate of 1,740,426 shares of our common stock as an in-kind repayment of all outstanding principal and accrued interest on these short-term notes.



Paycheck Protection Program Loan

In May 2020, we received approximately $0.2 million in proceeds from an approved loan under the Paycheck Protection Program.  Interest will accrue on outstanding principal balance at a rate of 1%, computed on a simple interest basis.  The loan principal and accrued interest will be eligible for forgiveness provided that (i) we use the loan proceeds exclusively for allowed costs including payroll, employee group health benefits, rent and utilities and (ii) employee and compensation levels are maintained.  If the loan is not forgiven, we will be required to make monthly repayments of approximately $8,000 per month commencing November 1, 2020 and the loan will mature on May 3, 2022, at which time any unpaid principal and accrued interest will be due and payable.  The current and noncurrent portions of this loan are included in the captions “Unsecured notes payable” and “Other long-term liabilities” in the condensed consolidated balance sheet as of June 30, 2020.



Convertible Notes



Our convertible notes represent five-year promissory notes that are convertible, at the holders’ option, into shares of our common stock at fixed conversion prices.  The notes bear interest at a stated rate of 8% per annum, except for the July 18, 2019 notes which bear interest at a stated rate of 7.5% per annum.  Interest is payable quarterly, and we may elect to pay interest in either cash, shares of our common stock, or a combination thereof, subject to certain equity conditions.  To date, all interest payments on the convertible notes have been made in shares of our common stock, including payments of $0.14 million during the six months ended June 30, 2020. 



We have the option to prepay the majority of the notes any time following the one-year anniversary of the issuance of the notes, subject to a premium on the outstanding principal prepayment amount of 25% prior to the two-year anniversary of the note issuance date, 20% prior to the three-year anniversary of the note issuance date, 15% prior to the four-year anniversary of the note issuance date, or 10% thereafter.  We do not have a prepayment option with regard to the July 18, 2019 notes or the January 8, 2020 notes.



Notes with a principal balance of $0.13 million were converted, at the option of the holder, into shares of our common stock during the six month period ended June 30, 2020.

---

 

Convertible notes payable at June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 consist of the following (in thousands):





Secured Contingent Payment Obligation



The following table provides a reconciliation of our secured contingent payment obligation, measured at estimated fair market value, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):







Our secured contingent payment obligation represents the estimated fair value of our repayment obligation to Brickell Key Investments, LP (“Brickell”) under a February 2016 funding agreement, as amended.    Brickell is entitled to priority payment of 55% to 100% of proceeds received from all patent-related actions until such time that Brickell has been repaid in full.  After repayment of the funded amount, which is $14.7 million as of June 30, 2020, Brickell is entitled to a portion of remaining proceeds up to a specified minimum return which is determined as a percentage of the funded amount and varies based on the timing of repayment.  In addition, Brickell is entitled to a pro rata portion of proceeds from specified legal actions to the extent aggregate proceeds from those actions exceed the specified minimum return.  As of June 30, 2020, we are in compliance with our obligations under this agreement.



We have elected to measure our secured contingent payment obligation at fair value based on probability-weighted estimated cash outflows, discounted back to present value using a discount rate determined in accordance with accepted valuation methods.  The secured contingent payment obligation is remeasured to fair value at each reporting period with changes recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss until the contingency is resolved (see Note 10). 

---

 



Unsecured Contingent Payment Obligations



The following table provides a reconciliation of our unsecured contingent payment obligations, measured at estimated fair market value, for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and the year ended December 31, 2019 (in thousands):







Our unsecured contingent payment obligations represent amounts payable to others from future patent-related proceeds including (i) a termination fee due to a litigation funder (“Termination Fee”) and (ii) contingent payment rights issued to accredited investors in connection with equity financings (“CPRs”). We have elected to measure these unsecured contingent payment obligations at their estimated fair value based on probability-weighted estimated cash outflows, discounted back to present value using a discount rate determined in accordance with accepted valuation methods.  The unsecured contingent payment obligations will be remeasured to fair value at each reporting period with changes recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss until the contingency is resolved (see Note 10).



The Termination Fee is a result of $1.0 million received as advances under a letter agreement with a third-party funder.  Based on the terms of the letter agreement, if a final funding arrangement was not executed by March 31, 2020, we would be obligated to pay, from future patent-related proceeds, an aggregate termination payment equal to five times the upfront payment received, or $5.0 million.  We did not reach an agreement as of March 31, 2020 and formally terminated negotiations in April 2020.  Advances under the letter agreement included $0.4 million as of December 31, 2019, and $0.6 million advanced in January 2020.  The advances, which were initially recorded in other long-term liabilities, were reclassified to unsecured contingent payment obligations at March 31, 2020 when the Termination Fee obligation was incurred.  As of June 30, 2020, the estimated fair value of unsecured contingent payment obligations related to the Termination Fee is $2.4 million.



The CPRs represent the estimated fair value of rights provided to accredited investors who purchased shares of our common stock between March and June 2020 (see Note 12).   During the six months ended June 30, 2020, we received proceeds of $1.5 million from the sale of common stock with contingent payment rights, of which $0.7 million was allocated to the CPRs.  In addition, on May 1, 2020, we granted CPRs to purchasers of $0.9 million of our common stock in March 2020, resulting in a charge to expense of $0.4 million for the initial estimated fair value of the CPRs.  The terms of the CPRs provide that we will pay each investor an allocated portion of our net proceeds from patent-related actions, after taking into account fees and expenses payable to law firms representing us and amounts payable to Brickell.  The investors’ allocated portion of net proceeds will be determined by multiplying the net proceeds recovered by us (up to $10 million) by the quotient of such investors’ subscription amount divided by $10 million, up to an amount equal to each investor’s subscription amount, or an aggregate of $2.4 million.  As of June 30, 2020, the estimated fair value of unsecured contingent payment obligations related to the CPRs is $1.1 million.

---

 

10. Fair Value Measurements



The following tables summarize the fair value of our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019 (in thousands):







 





The fair values of our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations were estimated using a probability-weighted income approach based on various cash flow scenarios as to the outcome of patent-related actions both in terms of timing and amount, discounted to present value using a risk-adjusted rate.  We used a risk-adjusted discount rate of 14.18% at June 30, 2020, based on a risk-free rate of 0.18% as adjusted by 8% for credit risk and 6% for litigation inherent risk. 



The following table provides quantitative information about the significant unobservable inputs used in the measurement of fair value for both the secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations at June 30, 2020, including the lowest and highest undiscounted payout scenarios as well as a weighted average payout scenario based on relative undiscounted fair value of each cash flow scenario. 







---

 

We evaluate the estimates and assumptions used in determining the fair value of our contingent payment obligations each reporting period and make any adjustments prospectively based on those evaluations.   Changes in any of these Level 3 inputs could result in a significantly higher or lower fair value measurement.

 

11.  Legal Proceedings



From time to time, we are subject to legal proceedings and claims which arise in the ordinary course of our business. These proceedings include patent enforcement actions initiated by us against others for the infringement of our technologies, as well as proceedings brought by others against us at the Patent Trial and Appeal Board of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (“PTAB”) and in the Federal Patent Court in Germany in an attempt to invalidate certain of our patent claims. We had several patent enforcement actions in Germany, which has a “loser pay” system whereby the non-prevailing party is responsible for statutory attorney fees and costs. To the extent a loss is probable and reasonably estimable as of the balance sheet date, the estimated loss is recorded in the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss and included in current liabilities under the heading “statutory court costs” in the condensed consolidated balance sheets. As of June 30, 2020, and December 31, 2019, we have accrued an aggregate of $0.33 million and $0.37 million, respectively, in estimated statutory court costs for our cases in Germany.



ParkerVision v. Qualcomm and HTC (Middle District of Florida)

We have a patent infringement complaint pending in the Middle District of Florida against Qualcomm and Qualcomm Atheros, Inc. (collectively “Qualcomm”), and HTC (HTC Corporation and HTC America, Inc.) (the “Qualcomm Action”) seeking unspecified damages and injunctive relief for infringement of certain of our patents. The defendants have filed counterclaims against us for non-infringement and invalidity for all patents in the case. The case was filed in May 2014 and stayed in February 2016 pending decisions in other cases, including the appeal of a PTAB proceeding with regard to U.S. patent 6,091,940 (“the ‘940 Patent”) asserted in this case.  In September 2018, the Federal Circuit issued its decision with regard to the ‘940 Patent and, in January 2019, the court lifted the stay in this case.  In July 2019, the court issued an order that granted our proposed selection of patent claims from four asserted patents, including the ‘940 Patent, and denied Qualcomm’s request to limit the claims and patents. The court also agreed that we may elect to pursue accused products that were at issue at the time the case was stayed, as well as new products that were released by Qualcomm during the pendency of the stay.  In September 2019, Qualcomm filed a motion for partial summary judgement in an attempt to exclude certain patents from the case, including the ‘940 Patent.  The court denied this motion in January 2020.  A claim construction hearing was held in this case in August 2015, prior to the stay, and a second claim construction hearing was held in November 2019.  In April 2020, the court issued its claim construction order in which the court adopted our proposed construction for seven of the ten disputed terms and adopted slightly modified versions of our proposed construction for the remaining terms.  This case was scheduled for trial beginning December 1, 2020; however, in March 2020, in response to the impact of COVID-19, the court stayed all deadlines and discovery responses in the case.   In June 2020, the court lifted the temporary stay and issued a new scheduling order moving a number of deadlines, including a change in the trial commencement date to May 3, 2021.  Discovery and depositions in this case are currently underway.  The law firm of McKool Smith is representing us in this case on a contingency fee basis.



ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm (Middle District of Florida)

In December 2015, we filed a patent infringement complaint in the Middle District of Florida against Apple, LG, Samsung and Qualcomm alleging infringement of four of our patents. In February 2016, the district court proceedings were stayed pending resolution of a corresponding case filed at the International Trade Commission (“ITC”). In July 2016, we entered into a patent license and settlement agreement with

---

 

Samsung and, as a result, Samsung was dismissed from the district court action. In March 2017, we filed a motion to terminate the ITC proceedings and a corresponding motion to lift the stay in the district court case. This motion was granted in May 2017. In July 2017, we filed a motion to dismiss LG from the district court case (see ParkerVision v. LG below).  Also in July 2017, Qualcomm filed a motion to change venue to the southern district of California, and Apple filed a motion to dismiss for improper venue. In March 2018, the district court ruled against the Qualcomm and Apple motions. The parties also filed a joint motion in March 2018 to eliminate three of the four patents in the case in order to expedite proceedings leaving our U.S. patent 9,118,528 as the only remaining patent in this case. A claim construction hearing was held on August 31, 2018. In July 2019, the court issued its claim construction order in which the court adopted our proposed claim construction for two of the six terms and the “plain and ordinary meaning” on the remaining terms. In addition, the court denied a motion filed by Apple for summary judgment.  Fact discovery has closed in this case and a jury trial was scheduled to begin in August 2020.   In March 2020, as a result of the impact of COVID-19, the parties filed a motion requesting an extension of certain deadlines in the case. In April 2020, the court stayed this proceeding pending the outcome of ParkerVision v. Qualcomm and HTC. 



ParkerVision v. LG (District of New Jersey)

In July 2017, we filed a patent infringement complaint in the New Jersey against LG for the alleged infringement of the same patents previously asserted against LG in Florida (see ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm above).  We elected to dismiss the case in Florida and re-file in New Jersey as a result of a Supreme Court ruling regarding proper venue.  In March 2018, the court stayed this case pending a final decision in ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm in the Middle District of Florida. As part of this stay, LG has agreed to be bound by the final claim construction decision in that case.



ParkerVision v. LG Electronics (Munich, Germany)

In June 2016, we filed a complaint in Munich District Court against LG Electronics Deutschland GmbH, a German subsidiary of LG Electronics, Inc. (“LGE”) seeking damages and injunctive relief for the alleged infringement of the German part of our European patent 1 206 831 (“the ‘831 Patent”). In November 2016, the court concluded that certain LGE products using Qualcomm RF circuitry infringe our patent.  The final decision in this case was stayed pending resolution of the corresponding nullity, or validity, action filed by Qualcomm in the German Federal Patent Court in Munich (see Qualcomm v. ParkerVision below).  In October 2018, we received an unfavorable decision in the nullity case.   As a result, our infringement complaint in this case was dismissed.  As the non-prevailing party, we are subject to claims for reimbursement of statutory attorney’s fees and costs in this case which are accrued in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.  We have posted a bond to cover this cost which is included in “Prepaid expenses” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets. In April 2020, the court fixed the amounts due for statutory attorney’s fees and costs, and we have requested a release of the bond funds which will fully cover this cost. 



Qualcomm v. ParkerVision – Federal Patent Court in Germany (as appealed to the German Supreme Court)

In August 2016, Qualcomm filed a validity action in Federal Patent Court in Germany against the ’831 Patent. The outcome of this validity action impacts our German patent infringement cases against LGE and Apple as discussed above. On October 17, 2018, following an oral hearing, the court ruled that the ‘831 Patent was invalid.    In January 2019, we appealed this decision to the German Supreme Court, but withdrew our appeal in July 2019.  As the non-prevailing party, we are subject to claims for reimbursement of statutory fees and costs in this case, which are accrued in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.  



---

 

ParkerVision v. Apple (Munich, Germany) – the Apple II case

The Apple II case sought damages and injunctive relief for the alleged infringement of the German part of our European patent 1 135 853 (“the ‘853 Patent”).  The court ruled in April 2019 that Apple does not infringe our ‘853 Patent. We did not appeal this decision. As the non-prevailing party, we are subject to claims for reimbursement of statutory attorney’s fees and costs in this case which we have accrued in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019. We have posted a bond to cover this cost which is included in “Prepaid expenses” in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.



Intel v. ParkerVision (Federal Patent Court in Germany)

In August 2017, Intel filed a nullity action in German Federal Patent Court claiming invalidity of the ‘853 Patent that is the subject of the Apple II case.  In December 2019, following the adverse decision in the Apple II case, we elected not to proceed with a defense in this case.  As the non-prevailing party, we are subject to claims for reimbursement of statutory attorney fees and costs in this case which we have accrued in the accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2020 and December 31, 2019.



ParkerVision v. Intel (Western District of Texas)

In February 2020, we filed a patent infringement complaint in the Western District of Texas against Intel alleging infringement of eight of our patents. The complaint was amended in May 2020 to add two additional patents. In June 2020, we requested that one of the patents be dropped from this case and filed a second case in the Western District of Texas that included this dismissed patent (see ParkerVision v. Intel II below).  Intel’s response to our complaint was filed in June 2020 denying infringement and claiming invalidity of the patents.  Intel has also filed a motion to transfer venue which has not yet been ruled on by the court.  The Markman, or claim construction hearing, is currently scheduled for January 22, 2021 and the case is scheduled for trial beginning February 7, 2022.    The law firm of Goldberg Segalla is representing us in this case on a contingency fee basis.  



ParkerVision v. Intel II (Western District of Texas)

In June 2020, to reduce the number of claims in ParkerVision v. Intel,  we filed a second patent infringement complaint in the Western District of Texas against Intel that included a single patent that was dismissed from the original case.   In July 2020, we amended our complaint adding two more patents to the case.  No dates have yet been set in this case.    The law firm of Goldberg Segalla is representing us in this case on a contingency fee basis.



ParkerVision v. TCL Technology Group Corp (Central District of California)

In May 2020, we filed a patent infringement complaint against Technology Group Corp, a Chinese company, and its U.S. subsidiary, TTE Technology, Inc. (collectively “TCL”) in the Central District of California alleging infringement of nine of our patents. TCL products included in the action incorporate modules that contain certain Wi-Fi chips manufactured by Realtek Semiconductor Corporation, a Taiwanese IC provider.  TCL’s response to our complaint is due October 9, 2020.  The law firm of Goldberg Segalla is representing us in this case on a contingency fee basis. 



12. Stock Issuance



Stock and Warrant Issuances – Equity Based Financings





Private Placements with Accredited Investors

In January 2020, we entered into securities purchase agreements with accredited investors for an aggregate of 1,169,232 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.13 per share and 166,667 shares of our common stock at $0.15 per share for aggregate proceeds of approximately $0.2 million. In March

---

 

2020, we entered into securities purchase agreements with accredited investors for an aggregate of 2,571,432 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.35 per share for aggregate proceeds of $0.9 million.  The shares were registered for resale on a registration statement that was declared effective on April 28, 2020 (File No. 333-237762). 



The securities purchase agreements for the March 2020 transaction were amended on May 1, 2020,  in order to add a contingent payment right whereby we will pay each investor an allocated portion of our share of proceeds from patent-related actions, after taking into account fees and expenses payable to law firms representing the Company and amounts payable to Brickell, up to an amount equal to the investors’ aggregate subscription amount, or $0.9 million.   This amendment resulted in the recognition of $0.4 million in expense to recognize the initial fair value of the contingent payment right (see “unsecured contingent payment obligations” in Note 9). 



During the three months ended June 30, 2020, we entered into securities purchase agreements with accredited investors for an aggregate of 4,365,296 shares of our common stock at a price of $0.35 per share for aggregate proceeds of $1.5 million.  The securities purchase agreements include contingent payment rights.   Approximately $0.7 million of the proceeds were allocated to unsecured contingent payment obligations based on the initial fair value estimate of the CPRs (see Note 9).  We entered into registration rights agreements with the investors pursuant to which we will register the shares.  We have committed to file the registration statement by August 21, 2020 and to cause the registration statement to become effective by the 150th calendar day following the closing date. The registration rights agreements provide for liquidated damages upon the occurrence of certain events including failure by us to file the registration statement or cause it to become effective by the deadlines set forth above. The amount of the liquidated damages is 1.0% of the aggregate subscription upon the occurrence of the event, and monthly thereafter, up to a maximum of 6%, or approximately $0.1 million.



Warrant Amendment with Aspire Capital

On February 28, 2020, we entered into a warrant amendment agreement (the “Warrant Amendment Agreement”) with Aspire Capital Fund, LLC (“Aspire”), with respect to warrants issued in July and September 2018 (the “2018 Warrants”) that are exercisable, collectively, into 5,000,000 shares of our common stock.   The Warrant Amendment Agreement provided for a reduction in the exercise price for the 2018 Warrants from $0.74 to $0.35 per share and the issuance of a new warrant for the purchase of 5,000,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.74 per share (“New Aspire Warrant”).   The New Aspire Warrant expires February 28, 2025 and is subject to adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock and also upon any distributions of assets to our stockholders.  The New Aspire Warrant contains provisions that prohibit exercise if the holder, together with its affiliates, would beneficially own in excess of 9.99% of the number of shares of common stock outstanding immediately after giving effect to such exercise. The holder of the New Aspire Warrant may increase (up to 19.99%) or decrease this percentage by providing at least 61 days’ prior notice to the Company. In the event of certain corporate transactions, the holder of the New Aspire Warrant will be entitled to receive, upon exercise of such New Aspire Warrant, the kind and amount of securities, cash or other property that the holder would have received had they exercised the New Aspire Warrant immediately prior to such transaction. The New Aspire Warrant does not contain voting rights or any of the other rights or privileges as a holder of our common stock.



The Warrant Amendment Agreement added a call provision to the 2018 Warrants whereby we may, after December 31, 2020, call for cancellation of all or any portion of the 2018 Warrants for which an exercise notice has not yet been received, in exchange for consideration equal to $0.001 per warrant share and subject to certain conditions, including the continued existence of an effective registration statement for the underlying shares of common stock and the availability of sufficient authorized shares to allow for the

---

 

exercise of the 2018 Warrants.  All other terms of the 2018 Warrants remained unchanged, including the original expiration dates of July and September 2023.  In connection with the Warrant Amendment Agreement, Aspire exercised 1,430,000 shares of the 2018 Warrants for aggregate proceeds to us of $0.5 million.  An additional 1,070,000 shares of the 2018 Warrants were exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2020 for aggregate proceeds to us of $0.38 million.  We recognized $1.78 million of non-cash warrant expense in connection with the Warrant Amendment Agreement based on the difference between the Black-Scholes value of the warrants immediately before and after the amendment.  The shares underlying the New Aspire Warrant were registered for resale on a registration statement that was declared effective on April 28, 2020 (File No. 333-237762).  The shares underlying the 2018 Warrants are currently registered for resale pursuant to a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-226738). 



Stock and Warrant Issuances – Payment for Services



On February 10, 2020, we entered into a business consulting and retention agreement with Chelsea Investor Relations (“Chelsea”) to provide business advisory services to us.  As consideration for services to be provided under the 24-month term of the consulting agreement, we issued 500,000 shares of unregistered common stock in exchange for a nonrefundable retainer for services valued at approximately $0.15 million.  The value of the stock issued is being recognized as consulting expense over the term of the agreement. The shares were registered for resale on a registration statement that was declared effective on April 28, 2020 (File No. 333-237762).



On March 16, 2020, we entered into an agreement with Tailwinds Research Group LLC (“Tailwinds”) to provide digital marketing services to us.  As consideration for services to be provided under the twelve-month term of the agreement, we issued warrants for the purchase up to 200,000 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $1.00 per share in exchange for a nonrefundable retainer for services, valued using the Black-Scholes method, at approximately $0.06 million.  The value of the warrants is being recognized to expense over the term of the agreement.  The Tailwinds warrants are exercisable immediately after issuance, expire March 16, 2023, and are subject to adjustment in the event of certain stock dividends and distributions, stock splits, stock combinations, reclassifications or similar events affecting our common stock.  The shares underlying the warrant were registered for resale on a registration statement that was declared effective on April 28, 2020 (File No. 333-237762). 



On June 8, 2020, we entered into an agreement with a third party to provide media advisory services.  As consideration for services to be provided under the term of the agreement, which extends through December 31, 2020, we issued 30,000 shares of unregistered common stock for a nonrefundable retainer for services valued at approximately $0.01 million.  The value of the stock issued is being recognized as a consulting expense over the term of the agreement.  We are not obligated to register the shares for resale.



Common Stock Warrants



As of June 30, 2020, we had outstanding warrants for the purchase of up to 14.9 million shares of our common stock.  The estimated grant date fair value of these warrants of $2.3 million is included in Additional Paid-in Capital in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.  As of June 30, 2020, our outstanding warrants have an average exercise price of $0.43 per share and a weighted average remaining life of approximately 3.4 years.

 

---

 

13. Share-Based Compensation



There has been no material change in the assumptions used to compute the fair value of our equity awards, nor in the method used to account for share-based compensation from those stated in our 2019 Annual Report. 



The following table presents share-based compensation expense included in our condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive loss for the three months ended June 30,  2020 and 2019, respectively (in thousands):



 

As of June 30, 2020, there was $0.8 million of total unrecognized compensation cost related to all non-vested share-based compensation awards.  The cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted-average period of approximately 1 year.



On January 14, 2020, the Board granted nonqualified stock options to purchase 218,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.21 and 171,000 restricted shares awards (“RSAs”) to former directors in settlement of approximately $0.3 million in past Board and committee compensation fees.  The options and RSAs vest immediately upon grant and the options expire five years from the grant date.



On February 9, 2020, the Board approved awards under the Company’s 2019 Long Term Incentive Plan (the “2019 Plan”) to executives and other key employees. The awards included 675,000 restricted share units (“RSUs”) and 150,000 nonqualified stock options at an exercise price of $0.33 per share.  Fifty percent (50%)  of the RSUs vest on May 9, 2020 and the remaining RSUs vest in four equal quarterly installments commencing August 9, 2020.  The options vest 50% upon grant with the remainder vesting in four equal quarterly installments commencing May 10, 2020.



In addition, on February 9, 2020, the Board approved equity awards to independent directors under the 2019 Plan for the directors’ continued waiver of all cash fees for board or committee service.  The awards included 150,000 RSUs and 300,000 nonqualified stock options at an exercise price of $0.33 per share. The non-employee director awards vest 50% upon grant with the remaining portion vesting in four equal quarterly installments commencing May 9, 2020.  The Board also awarded an immediately vested option to purchase 100,000 shares at an exercise price of $0.33 per share under the Company’s 2011 Long Term Incentive Equity Plan to Robert Sterne in exchange for Mr. Sterne’s waiver of approximately $0.1 million in accrued and unpaid fees for board and committee service from 2016 to 2018.  Each of the options awarded expire on February 9, 2027.



Non-Employee Compensation

On June 7, 2020, we extended our 2019 business consulting and retention agreement with Mark Fisher to provide business advisory services to us through 2020.  As consideration for services to be provided under the 12-month term of the consulting agreement, we issued a restricted stock award (RSA) of 20,000 shares of common stock through the 2019 Long Term Incentive Plan in exchange for a nonrefundable retainer for services valued at approximately $0.01 million.  The value of the shares issued was recognized as share-based compensation at the time of issuance.   

---

 

ITEM 2.  Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations



Forward-Looking Statements



We believe that it is important to communicate our future expectations to our shareholders and to the public.  This quarterly report contains forward-looking statements, within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, including, in particular, statements about our future plans, objectives, and expectations contained in this Item.  When used in this quarterly report and in future filings by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), the words or phrases “expects”, “will likely result”, “will continue”, “is anticipated”, “estimated” or similar expressions are intended to identify “forward-looking statements.”  Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on such forward-looking statements, each of which speaks only as of the date made.  Such statements are subject to certain risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from historical results and those presently anticipated or projected, including the risks and uncertainties identified in our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 (the “2019 Annual Report”) and in this Item 2 of Part I of this quarterly report.  Examples of such risks and uncertainties include general economic and business conditions, competition, unexpected changes in technologies and technological advances, the timely development and commercial acceptance of new products and technologies, reliance on key suppliers, reliance on our intellectual property, the outcome of our intellectual property litigation and the ability to obtain adequate financing in the future.  We have no obligation to publicly release the results of any revisions which may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect anticipated events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.



Corporate Website



We announce investor information, including news and commentary about our business, financial performance and related matters, SEC filings, notices of investor events, and our press and earnings releases, in the investor relations section of our website (http://ir.parkervision.com). Additionally, if applicable, we webcast our earnings calls and certain events we participate in or host with members of the investment community in the investor relations section of our website.   Investors and others can receive notifications of new information posted in the investor relations section in real time by signing up for email alerts and/or RSS feeds.  Further corporate governance information, including our governance guidelines, Board committee charters, and code of conduct, is also available in the investor relations section of our website under the heading “Corporate Governance.”  The content of our website is not incorporated by reference into this Annual Report or in any other report or document we file with the SEC, and any references to our website are intended to be inactive textual references only.



Overview



We have designed and developed proprietary radio frequency (“RF”) technologies and integrated circuits for use in wireless communication products. We have expended significant financial and other resources to research and develop our RF technologies and to obtain patent protection for those technologies in the United States of America (“U.S.”) and certain foreign jurisdictions. We believe certain patents protecting our proprietary technologies have been broadly infringed by others and therefore the primary focus of our business plan is the enforcement of our intellectual property rights through patent infringement litigation and licensing efforts. We currently have patent enforcement actions ongoing in various U.S. district courts against providers of mobile handsets and smart televisions and, in certain cases, their chip suppliers for the infringement of several of our RF patents.  We have made significant investments in developing and protecting our technologies, the returns on which are dependent upon the generation of future revenues for realization.



---

 

Recent Developments



Impact of COVID-19

Many states, including Florida, have been under a stay-at-home order since mid-March 2020 in an effort to contain the spread of COVID-19.  While our employees currently have the ability and are encouraged to work remotely, school closures and other stay-at-home measures have an impact on employee productivity and attendance and limit our ability to successfully sublease office space that is not in use.  In addition, we have experienced delays in certain deadlines in our patent infringement litigation as a result of court closures, travel bans and stay-at-home measures in Florida as well as other states in which we have ongoing litigation and states in which the defendants to our patent infringement actions have personnel and facilities.  In addition, the current economic environment as a result of COVID-19 makes access to debt and equity capital more challenging.  

In May 2020, we received approximately $0.2 million in proceeds from an approved loan under the Paycheck Protection Program.  Interest will accrue on outstanding principal balance at a rate of 1%, computed on a simple interest basis.  The loan principal and accrued interest will be eligible for forgiveness provided that (i) we use the loan proceeds exclusively for allowed costs including payroll, employee group health benefits, rent and utilities and (ii) employee and compensation levels are maintained.  We believe we will be eligible for forgiveness of all, or a substantial portion of, the loan.  If the loan is not forgiven, we will be required to make monthly repayments of approximately $8,000 per month commencing November 1, 2020 and the loan will mature on May 3, 2022, at which time any unpaid principal and accrued interest will be due and payable.

Legal Proceedings

In April 2020, the district court in the Middle District of Florida (Orlando division) issued its claim construction order in Parkervision v. Qualcomm and HTC whereby the court adopted the majority of our proposed claim construction language for the disputed terms.   In June 2020, the court lifted the temporary stay in place due to COVID-19 and discovery is underway.  The trial date in the case has been moved from December 2020 to May 2021 as a result of the COVID-19 delays. 



In addition, in April 2020, the district court in the Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville division) ruled to stay the ParkerVision v. Qualcomm and Apple action pending the resolution of the case in the Orlando division against Qualcomm and HTC. This case had originally been scheduled for trial commencing in August 2020 but was under an administrative stay due to the impact of COVID-19.



In 2020, we filed two separate complaints against Intel in the Western District of Texas alleging infringement of an aggregate of 12 of our patents.  We also filed an action against Chinese TCL Technology Group Corp and its U.S. subsidiary TTE Technology, Inc. (collectively “TCL”) in U.S. district court in the Central District of California alleging infringement of nine of our patents.  The law firm of Goldberg Segalla is representing us on a contingency fee basis in the Intel and TCL cases.



Sale of Stock with Contingent Payment Rights

From April to June 2020, we received an aggregate of $1.5 million from the sale of equity securities with contingent payment rights.  In July, we received aggregate net proceeds of $0.2 million from additional sales of equity securities with contingent payment rights.  The contingent payment rights entitle the investors to an allocated portion of our share of proceeds from patent-related actions, after taking into account fees and expenses payable to law firms representing us and amounts payable to Brickell.   



---

 

Liquidity and Capital Resources



We have incurred significant losses from operations and negative operating cash flows in every year since inception, largely as a result of our significant investments in developing and protecting our intellectual property, and have utilized the proceeds from sales of debt and equity securities and contingent funding arrangements with third-parties to fund our operations, including the cost of litigation. 



At June 30, 2020, we had cash and cash equivalents of $0.5 million, a working capital deficit of approximately $4.6 million, and an accumulated deficit of approximately $413.3 million.  These circumstances raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue to operate as a going concern within one year following the issue date of our condensed consolidated financial statements.



We used cash for operations of approximately $3.0 million and $2.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  The increase in cash used for operations from 2019 to 2020 is primarily due to increases in payments of out-of-pocket expenses for ongoing litigation that were not covered under existing contingent fee arrangements.  For the six months ended June 30, 2020, we received aggregate net proceeds from the sale of debt and equity securities, including the exercise of outstanding warrants, of approximately $4.7 million compared to approximately $1.9 million in proceeds received for the six months ended June 30, 2019.  We repaid approximately $1.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively in debt obligations during the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019.  In addition, we repaid approximately $0.7 million in short-term debt and other accrued expenses with the use of shares of our common stock during the six months ended June 30, 2020.  Despite our recent funding efforts, our resources are not sufficient to meet our short-term liquidity needs and we will be required to seek additional capital.



In July 2020, we received aggregate proceeds from the sale of equity securities and unsecured contingent payment rights of approximately $0.2 million.  In addition, we are exploring additional financing opportunities for both our short and long-term capital needs.  These financing opportunities may include debt, convertible debt, common or preferred equity offerings, or a combination thereof.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to consummate a financing transaction or that the terms of such financing will be on terms and conditions that are acceptable.  



At June 30, 2020, we had approximately $0.2 million in debt obligations to be paid within twelve months, a decrease of $1.3 million in current debt obligations at December 31, 2019.  The decrease in our short-term debt repayment obligations is primarily the result of $1.2 million in repayments under secured and unsecured promissory notes and $0.2 million in repayments of short-term notes with shares of our common stock, somewhat offset by approximately $0.1 million increase in short-term repayment obligations from our Paycheck Protection Program loan received in 2020.



Our ability to meet our short-term liquidity needs, including our debt repayment obligations, is dependent upon (i) our ability to successfully negotiate licensing agreements and/or settlements relating to the use of our technologies by others in excess of our contingent payment obligations to Brickell, legal counsel, and other investors; and (ii) our ability to raise additional capital from the sale of debt or equity securities or other financing arrangements.    



---

 

Patent enforcement litigation is costly and time-consuming and the outcome is difficult to predict.   We expect to continue to invest in the support of our patent enforcement and licensing programs.  We expect that revenue generated from patent enforcement actions and/or technology licenses in 2020, if any, after deduction of payment obligations to Brickell, legal counsel, and other investors, may not be sufficient to cover our operating expenses.  In the event we do not generate revenues, or other patent-related proceeds, sufficient to cover our operational costs and contingent repayment obligations, we will be required to raise additional working capital through the sale of equity securities or other financing arrangements.



The long-term continuation of our business plan is dependent upon the generation of sufficient revenues from our technologies and/or products to offset expenses and contingent payment obligations.  In the event that we do not generate sufficient revenues, we will be required to obtain additional funding through public or private debt or equity financing or contingent fee arrangements and/or reduce operating costs.  Failure to generate sufficient revenues, raise additional capital through debt or equity financings or contingent fee arrangements, and/or reduce operating costs will have a material adverse effect on our ability to meet our long-term liquidity needs and achieve our intended long-term business objectives.



Results of Operations for Each of the Three Months Ended June 30, 2020 and 2019



Revenue and Gross Margin

We reported no licensing revenue for the three or six-month periods ended June 30, 2020 or 2019.  Although we do anticipate licensing revenue and/or settlement gains to result from our licensing and patent enforcement actions, the amount and timing is highly unpredictable and there can be no assurance that we will achieve our anticipated results. 



Due to our ceasing the sales of Milo products in the fourth quarter of 2019, we reported no product revenue for the three or six-month periods ended June 30, 2020.  We reported approximately $0.03 and $0.04 million for the three and six-month periods ended June 30, 2019, from sales of our Milo-branded WiFi products.



Research and Development Expenses

Subsequent to March 31, 2019, we halted substantially all research and development efforts and, where applicable, repurposed prior engineering resources to support our patent enforcement programs for our Milo sales and support. Research and development expenses for the six-month period ended June 30, 2019 consist primarily of engineering and related management and support personnel costs; software licensing and support costs, which represent the annual licensing and support maintenance for engineering design and other software tools; and an allocated portion of rent and other overhead costs for our facilities.  Personnel costs include share-based compensation which represents the grant date fair value of equity-based awards to our employees which is attributed to expense over the service period of the award. 



Our research and development expenses decreased by approximately $0.3 million, or 100.0%, during the six months ended June 30, 2020 when compared to the same six-month period in 2019.  The decrease is primarily the result of $0.2 million in personnel and related costs being repurposed for selling, general and administrative purposes, including litigation support and Milo sales and support as well as a $0.1 million reduction in research and development personnel costs.



Selling, General, and Administrative Expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses consist primarily of litigation fees and expenses, personnel and related costs, including share-based compensation, for executive, board, finance and accounting and technical support for our patent enforcement program, and costs incurred for insurance, outside accounting and legal professional fees, shareholder relations and noncash expenses including amortization and expense recognized in connection with contract amendments. 

---

 

Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $0.5 million, or 26%, during the three months ended June 30, 2020 when compared to the same period in 2019.  This is primarily the result of the recognition of $0.4 million of expense associated with an amendment to our March 2020 equity transactions, a $0.3 million increase in share-based compensation, and impairment of the right-of -use asset associated with the Lake Mary lease of $0.2 million.  These increases are partially offset by decreases in litigation expenses, rent expense, amortization and losses recognized upon abandonment of intangible assets of $0.1 million each.



Our selling, general and administrative expenses increased by approximately $3.8 million, or 95%, during the six months ended June 30, 2020 when compared to the same period in 2019. This is primarily due to a $1.5 million increase in litigation expenses, a $0.6 million increase in share-based compensation expense, recognition of $0.4 million of expense associated with an amendment to our March 2020 equity transactions, recognition of $1.8 million of expense associated with amendments to warrant agreements, and impairment of the right of use asset associated with our Lake Mary lease of $0.2 million.  These increases are somewhat offset by decreases in Board compensation of $0.3 million and decreases in rent and amortization of $0.1 million each.



Litigation-related fees and expenses were $0.3 million and $0.4 million for the three months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  This decrease in litigation fees and expenses is primarily the result of the conclusion of our German litigation actions in 2019.  Litigation-related fees and expenses were $3.0 million and $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2020 and 2019, respectively.  This increase is primarily the result of increased activity during the first quarter of 2020 for the Middle District of Florida (Jacksonville division) case in ParkerVision v. Apple and Qualcomm for depositions and expert reports, somewhat offset by a decrease in fees and expenses related to our German actions. 



During the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, we incurred a noncash charge of $0.4 million to recognize the estimated fair value of a contingent payment right associated with a May 2020 amendment to our March 2020 equity transactions   The contingent payment right entitles each investor in the March 2020 equity transactions to receive an allocated portion of our share of proceeds from patent-related actions, after taking into account fees and expenses payable to law firms representing us and amounts payable to Brickell, up to an aggregate of $0.9 million.    



During the six months ended June 30, 2020, we also recognized a noncash charge of $1.8 million to recognize the estimated fair value of a warrant amendment agreement with Aspire Capital.  Under the amendment, we repriced 5 million existing warrants from $0.74 to $0.35 and issued 5 million replacement warrants at $0.74.  The expense represents the increase in the estimated fair value, using the Black-Scholes method, of the Aspire warrants immediately before and after the amendment.



The increase in share-based compensation for the three and six month periods is primarily due to executive and Board equity awards granted in August 2019 and the first quarter of 2020.  This increase is somewhat offset by a decrease in Board compensation expense due to the settlement of previously accrued Board fees in exchange for equity-based awards during the first quarter of 2020.



We recognized impairment of the right-of-use asset associated with our Lake Mary lease during the second quarter of 2020 based on a reduction in our estimated future sublease income, largely as a result of the impact of COVID-19.   The decrease in rent expense for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 is due to a down-sizing of our corporate headquarters in July 2019.  The decrease in amortization for the three and six months ended June 30, 2020 is due to the expiration or disposal of a number of patents during 2019 and 2020.





---

 

Change in Fair Value of Contingent Payment Obligations



We have elected to measure our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations at fair value which is based on significant unobservable inputs.  We estimated the fair value of our secured contingent payment obligations using a probability-weighted income approach based on the estimated present value of projected future cash outflows using a risk-adjusted discount rate.  Increases or decreases in the significant unobservable inputs could result in significant increases or decreases in fair value.



For the three and six months ended June 30, 2020, we recorded an increase in the fair value of our secured and unsecured contingent payment obligations of approximately $1.1 million and $3.4 million, respectively, compared to a decrease of approximately $0.4 million and $0.8 million for the same periods in 2019.  Generally, changes in fair value are a result of changes in estimated amounts and timing of projected future cash flows due to increases in funded amounts, passage of time, and changes in the probabilities based on the status of the funded actions.  In addition, in 2020, increases in fair value resulted from the sharp decrease in the risk-free interest rate used in the calculation of discounted projected future cash flows. 



Off-Balance Sheet Transactions, Arrangements and Other Relationships



As of June 30, 2020, we had outstanding warrants to purchase approximately 14.9 million shares of our common stock.  The estimated grant date fair value of these warrants of approximately $2.3 million is included in shareholders’ deficit in our condensed consolidated balance sheets.  The outstanding warrants have a weighted average exercise price of $0.43 per share and a weighted average remaining life of approximately 3.4 years.



Critical Accounting Policies



There have been no changes in accounting policies from those stated in our 2019 Annual Report.  We do not expect any newly effective accounting standards to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or cash flows when they become effective.



ITEM 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk. 



Not applicable.



ITEM 4.  Controls and Procedures.



Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures



As of June 30, 2020, our management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our “disclosure controls and procedures,” as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities and Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”).   Based upon this evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that these disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2020.  



Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting



There have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation required by Rule 13a-15(d) under the Exchange Act that occurred during the last fiscal quarter that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

---

 



PART II - OTHER INFORMATION



ITEM 1.  Legal Proceedings.



Reference is made to the section entitled “Legal Proceedings” in Note 11 to our unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements included in this quarterly report for a discussion of current legal proceedings, which discussion is incorporated herein by reference. 



ITEM 1A.  Risk Factors.



There have been no material changes from the risk factors disclosed in Item 1A of Part I of our Annual Report.  In addition to the information in this quarterly report, the risk factors disclosed in our Annual Report should be carefully considered in evaluating our business because such factors may have a significant impact on our business, operating results, liquidity and financial condition.



ITEM 2.  Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds.



In June 2020, we issued 30,000 shares of our common stock as payment of a retainer valued at approximately $14,000 for services provided under a consulting agreement with a third-party.  The shares issued were exempt from registration under Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act.  We are not obligated to register the shares for resale under the terms of the agreement.





ITEM 3.  Defaults Upon Senior Securities.



We have a note in the principal amount of $0.02 million payable to Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C. (“Mintz”) for outstanding, unpaid attorney’s fees and costs associated with our patent enforcement program.  We have been in payment default on the note since November 17, 2019, and accordingly, have accrued interest at the default rate of 12% per annum. Currently, Mintz has not requested acceleration of unpaid principal and interest on the note, nor have they waived the outstanding default. During the six months ended June 30, 2020, we made payments to Mintz of $1.2 million which we applied to outstanding principal and interest on the Mintz note, leaving an outstanding balance at June 30, 2020 of approximately $0.02 million. Mintz disputes our application of payments against principal and interest on the note rather than against the $3.1 million in outstanding billed and unpaid fees and expenses payable to Mintz that are included in our accounts payable at June 30, 2020.  We are in active discussions with Mintz to resolve our outstanding fee dispute.  Our total arrearage on the secured note as of August 14, 2020 is $0.02 million which includes default interest.



ITEM 4.  Mine Safety Disclosures.



Not applicable.



ITEM 5.  Other Information. 



None.



---

 

ITEM 6.  Exhibits.



*Filed herewith

---

 

SIGNATURES



Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.





 



---