PATTERSON UTI ENERGY INC - Quarter Report: 2009 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission file number 0-22664
Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
DELAWARE (State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) |
75-2504748 (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
|
450 GEARS ROAD, SUITE 500 | ||
HOUSTON, TEXAS | 77067 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(281) 765-7100
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
N/A
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
(Former name, former address and former fiscal year,
if changed since last report)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has
been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12
months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large
accelerated filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act:
Large accelerated filer þ | Accelerated filero | Non-accelerated filer o (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) |
Smaller Reporting Company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as
of the latest practicable date.
153,613,685 shares of common stock, $0.01 par value, as of July 31, 2009
PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
ITEM 1. Financial Statements
The following unaudited consolidated financial statements include all adjustments which are,
in the opinion of management, necessary for a fair statement of the results for the interim periods
presented.
PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
(unaudited, in thousands, except share data)
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Current assets: |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 167,665 | $ | 81,223 | ||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $14,481 and $9,330 at June
30, 2009 and December 31, 2008, respectively |
118,475 | 414,531 | ||||||
Federal and state income taxes receivable |
6,765 | 10,175 | ||||||
Inventory |
40,486 | 41,999 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets, net |
59,671 | 35,928 | ||||||
Other |
56,723 | 57,518 | ||||||
Total current assets |
449,785 | 641,374 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
2,093,609 | 1,937,112 | ||||||
Goodwill |
86,234 | 86,234 | ||||||
Deposits on equipment purchases |
13,327 | 43,944 | ||||||
Other |
8,396 | 4,153 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,651,351 | $ | 2,712,817 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Current liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 111,100 | $ | 169,958 | ||||
Accrued expenses |
108,603 | 132,655 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
219,703 | 302,613 | ||||||
Deferred tax liabilities, net |
305,500 | 277,717 | ||||||
Other |
5,528 | 5,545 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
530,731 | 585,875 | ||||||
Commitments and contingencies (see Note 9) |
| | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Preferred stock, par value $.01; authorized 1,000,000 shares, no shares issued |
| | ||||||
Common stock, par value $.01; authorized 300,000,000 shares with 180,802,252 and
180,192,093 issued and 153,615,821 and 153,094,803 outstanding at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
1,808 | 1,801 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
773,617 | 765,512 | ||||||
Retained earnings |
1,953,954 | 1,970,824 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
9,388 | 5,774 | ||||||
Treasury stock, at cost, 27,186,431 shares and 27,097,290 shares at June 30, 2009 and
December 31, 2008, respectively |
(618,147 | ) | (616,969 | ) | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
2,120,620 | 2,126,942 | ||||||
Total liabilities and stockholders equity |
$ | 2,651,351 | $ | 2,712,817 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
1
Table of Contents
PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF INCOME
(unaudited, in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Operating revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Contract drilling |
$ | 101,716 | $ | 416,835 | $ | 327,420 | $ | 836,984 | ||||||||
Pressure pumping |
33,616 | 57,094 | 71,721 | 99,958 | ||||||||||||
Drilling and completion fluids |
20,267 | 38,745 | 48,097 | 71,295 | ||||||||||||
Oil and natural gas |
5,165 | 13,609 | 9,565 | 22,600 | ||||||||||||
Total operating revenues |
160,764 | 526,283 | 456,803 | 1,030,837 | ||||||||||||
Operating costs and expenses: |
||||||||||||||||
Contract drilling |
56,950 | 251,381 | 183,271 | 495,748 | ||||||||||||
Pressure pumping |
22,862 | 32,506 | 49,868 | 61,011 | ||||||||||||
Drilling and completion fluids |
19,005 | 31,449 | 43,527 | 59,982 | ||||||||||||
Oil and natural gas |
1,820 | 3,529 | 3,796 | 5,596 | ||||||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and impairment |
68,857 | 65,673 | 139,204 | 129,399 | ||||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
16,236 | 17,747 | 32,220 | 34,743 | ||||||||||||
Net loss (gain) on asset disposals/retirements |
176 | (2,721 | ) | 350 | (2,535 | ) | ||||||||||
Other operating expenses |
2,000 | 300 | 6,000 | 600 | ||||||||||||
Total operating costs and expenses |
187,906 | 399,864 | 458,236 | 784,544 | ||||||||||||
Operating income (loss) |
(27,142 | ) | 126,419 | (1,433 | ) | 246,293 | ||||||||||
Other income (expense): |
||||||||||||||||
Interest income |
204 | 493 | 265 | 836 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(839 | ) | (63 | ) | (1,286 | ) | (340 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
12 | 353 | 35 | 737 | ||||||||||||
Total other income (expense) |
(623 | ) | 783 | (986 | ) | 1,233 | ||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
(27,765 | ) | 127,202 | (2,419 | ) | 247,526 | ||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit): |
||||||||||||||||
Current |
(2,862 | ) | 29,229 | (2,824 | ) | 57,941 | ||||||||||
Deferred |
(7,160 | ) | 16,551 | 1,945 | 30,754 | |||||||||||
Total income tax expense (benefit) |
(10,022 | ) | 45,780 | (879 | ) | 88,695 | ||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (17,743 | ) | $ | 81,422 | $ | (1,540 | ) | $ | 158,831 | ||||||
Net income (loss) per common share: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 1.03 | ||||||
Diluted |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 1.01 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||||||||||
Basic |
151,941 | 153,978 | 151,839 | 153,289 | ||||||||||||
Diluted |
151,941 | 155,894 | 151,839 | 155,410 | ||||||||||||
Cash dividends per common share |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 0.16 | $ | 0.10 | $ | 0.28 | ||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
2
Table of Contents
PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(unaudited, in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Income | Stock | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2008 |
180,192 | $ | 1,801 | $ | 765,512 | $ | 1,970,824 | $ | 5,774 | $ | (616,969 | ) | $ | 2,126,942 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net loss |
| | | (1,540 | ) | | | (1,540 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax of
$2,095 |
| | | | 3,614 | | 3,614 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | (1,540 | ) | 3,614 | | 2,074 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock |
588 | 6 | (6 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Vesting of restricted stock units |
6 | | | | | | | |||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeitures of restricted stock |
(32 | ) | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
48 | 1 | 270 | | | | 271 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 9,608 | | | | 9,608 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax expense related to
stock-based compensation |
| | (1,767 | ) | | | | (1,767 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Payment of cash dividends |
| | | (15,330 | ) | | | (15,330 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| | | | | (1,178 | ) | (1,178 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2009 |
180,802 | $ | 1,808 | $ | 773,617 | $ | 1,953,954 | $ | 9,388 | $ | (618,147 | ) | $ | 2,120,620 | ||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY
(unaudited, in thousands)
(unaudited, in thousands)
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock | Additional | Other | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Paid-in | Retained | Comprehensive | Treasury | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | Capital | Earnings | Income | Stock | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2007 |
177,386 | $ | 1,773 | $ | 703,581 | $ | 1,716,620 | $ | 20,207 | $ | (546,151 | ) | $ | 1,896,030 | ||||||||||||||
Comprehensive income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
| | | 158,831 | | | 158,831 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Foreign currency translation
adjustment, net of tax of
$1,206 |
| | | | (2,081 | ) | | (2,081 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
| | | 158,831 | (2,081 | ) | | 156,750 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Issuance of restricted stock |
577 | 6 | (6 | ) | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Forfeitures of restricted stock |
(30 | ) | | | | | | | ||||||||||||||||||||
Exercise of stock options |
2,284 | 23 | 25,344 | | | | 25,367 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation |
| | 10,137 | | | | 10,137 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Tax benefit related to
stock-based compensation |
| | 16,068 | | | | 16,068 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Payment of cash dividends |
| | | (43,504 | ) | | | (43,504 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Purchase of treasury stock |
| | | | | (4,559 | ) | (4,559 | ) | |||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2008 |
180,217 | $ | 1,802 | $ | 755,124 | $ | 1,831,947 | $ | 18,126 | $ | (550,710 | ) | $ | 2,056,289 | ||||||||||||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited, in thousands)
(unaudited, in thousands)
Six Months Ended | ||||||||
June 30, | ||||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (1,540 | ) | $ | 158,831 | |||
Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation, depletion and impairment |
139,204 | 129,399 | ||||||
Provision for bad debts |
6,000 | 600 | ||||||
Dry holes and abandonments |
118 | 600 | ||||||
Deferred income tax expense |
1,945 | 30,754 | ||||||
Stock-based compensation expense |
9,608 | 10,137 | ||||||
Net loss (gain) on asset disposals/retirements |
350 | (2,535 | ) | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
290,501 | (19,609 | ) | |||||
Income taxes receivable/payable |
3,595 | (19,923 | ) | |||||
Inventory and other assets |
4,031 | (2,912 | ) | |||||
Accounts payable |
(74,914 | ) | 14,929 | |||||
Accrued expenses |
(24,113 | ) | (13,960 | ) | ||||
Other liabilities |
(17 | ) | (13,035 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
354,768 | 273,276 | ||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of property and equipment |
(246,549 | ) | (176,162 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal of assets |
713 | 4,429 | ||||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(245,836 | ) | (171,733 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Purchases of treasury stock |
(1,178 | ) | (4,559 | ) | ||||
Dividends paid |
(15,330 | ) | (43,504 | ) | ||||
Tax benefit (expense) related to stock-based compensation |
(1,767 | ) | 16,068 | |||||
Repayment of borrowings under line of credit |
| (50,000 | ) | |||||
Line of credit issuance costs |
(6,169 | ) | | |||||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options |
271 | 25,367 | ||||||
Net cash used in financing activities |
(24,173 | ) | (56,628 | ) | ||||
Effect of foreign exchange rate changes on cash |
1,683 | (117 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
86,442 | 44,798 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period |
81,223 | 17,434 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period |
$ | 167,665 | $ | 62,232 | ||||
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information: |
||||||||
Net cash (paid) received during the period for: |
||||||||
Interest expense |
$ | (517 | ) | $ | (444 | ) | ||
Income taxes |
$ | 8,075 | $ | (60,025 | ) | |||
Non-cash investing and financing activities: |
||||||||
Net increase (decrease) in payables for purchases of property and equipment |
$ | 15,964 | $ | (7,119 | ) | |||
Net decrease in deposits on equipment purchases |
$ | 30,616 | $ | 1,223 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these unaudited consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
1. Basis of Consolidation and Presentation
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Patterson-UTI
Energy, Inc. (the Company) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany
accounts and transactions have been eliminated. Except for wholly-owned subsidiaries, the Company
has no controlling financial interests in any entity which would require consolidation.
The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements have been prepared by management of
the Company pursuant to the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America have been
omitted pursuant to such rules and regulations, although the Company believes the disclosures
included either on the face of the financial statements or herein are sufficient to make the
information presented not misleading. In the opinion of management, all adjustments which are of a
normal recurring nature considered necessary for a fair statement of the information in conformity
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been included. The
Unaudited Consolidated Balance Sheet as of December 31, 2008, as presented herein, was derived from
the audited consolidated balance sheet of the Company, but does not include all disclosures
required by accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America. These
unaudited consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated
financial statements and related notes included in the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2008. The results of operations for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the full year.
The U.S. dollar is the functional currency for all of the Companys operations except for its
Canadian operations, which uses the Canadian dollar as its functional currency. The effects of
exchange rate changes are reflected in accumulated other comprehensive income, which is a separate
component of stockholders equity.
The
Company has performed an evaluation of subsequent events through
August 4, 2009 at the time of issuance of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
The Company provides a dual presentation of its net income (loss) per common share in its
Unaudited Consolidated Statements of Income: Basic net income (loss) per common share (Basic
EPS) and diluted net income (loss) per common share (Diluted EPS). The Company adopted the
provisions of FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether Instruments Granted in
Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF 03-6-1) in the quarter
ended March 31, 2009. FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that share-based payment awards that entitle their
holders to receive non-forfeitable dividends before vesting should be considered participating
securities and, as such, should be included in the calculation of earnings-per-share using the
two-class method. All earnings per share data presented for the three and six months ended June
30, 2008 has been adjusted retrospectively to conform with the provisions of FSP EITF 03-6-1. The
impact of this retrospective application was to reduce Basic EPS for the three months ended June
30, 2008 by $0.01 and to reduce Basic EPS and Diluted EPS for the six months ended June 30, 2008 by
$0.01.
Basic EPS excludes dilution and is computed by first allocating earnings between common
stockholders and holders of non-vested shares of restricted stock. Basic EPS is then determined by
dividing the earnings attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period, excluding non-vested shares of
restricted stock.
Diluted EPS is based on the weighted average number of common shares outstanding plus the
dilutive effect of potential common shares, including stock options, non-vested shares of
restricted stock and restricted stock units. The dilutive effect of stock options and restricted
stock units is determined based on the treasury stock method. The dilutive effect of non-vested
shares of restricted stock is based on the more dilutive of the treasury stock method or the
two-class method, assuming a reallocation of undistributed earnings to common stockholders after
considering the dilutive effect of potential common shares other than non-vested shares of
restricted stock.
6
Table of Contents
The following table presents information necessary to calculate net income (loss) per share
for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 as well as potentially dilutive
securities excluded from the weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding, as their
inclusion would have been anti-dilutive during the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and
2008 (in thousands, except per share amounts):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
BASIC EPS: |
||||||||||||||||
Net income (loss) |
$ | (17,743 | ) | $ | 81,422 | $ | (1,540 | ) | $ | 158,831 | ||||||
Less earnings attributed to holders of non-vested restricted stock |
163 | (750 | ) | 14 | (1,466 | ) | ||||||||||
Earnings attributed to common stockholders |
$ | (17,580 | ) | $ | 80,672 | $ | (1,526 | ) | $ | 157,365 | ||||||
Weighted
average number of common shares outstanding, excluding non-vested
shares of restricted stock |
151,941 | 153,978 | 151,839 | 153,289 | ||||||||||||
Basic net income per common share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 1.03 | ||||||
DILUTED EPS: |
||||||||||||||||
Earnings attributed to common stockholders |
$ | (17,580 | ) | $ | 80,672 | $ | (1,526 | ) | $ | 157,365 | ||||||
Add incremental earnings related to potential common shares |
| 6 | | 15 | ||||||||||||
Adjusted earnings attributed to common stockholders |
$ | (17,580 | ) | $ | 80,678 | $ | (1,526 | ) | $ | 157,380 | ||||||
Weighted average number of common shares outstanding, excluding non-vested
shares of restricted stock |
151,941 | 153,978 | 151,839 | 153,289 | ||||||||||||
Add dilutive effect of potential common shares |
| 1,916 | | 2,121 | ||||||||||||
Weighted average number of diluted common shares outstanding |
151,941 | 155,894 | 151,839 | 155,410 | ||||||||||||
Diluted net income per common share |
$ | (0.12 | ) | $ | 0.52 | $ | (0.01 | ) | $ | 1.01 | ||||||
Potentially dilutive securities excluded as anti-dilutive |
8,386 | 655 | 8,386 | 2,380 | ||||||||||||
2. Stock-based Compensation
The Company recognizes the cost of share-based awards under the fair-value-based method. The
Company uses share-based awards to compensate employees and non-employee directors. All
share-based awards have been equity instruments in the form of stock options, restricted stock or
restricted stock units and have included service and, in certain cases, performance conditions.
The Company issues shares of common stock when vested stock options are exercised, when restricted
stock is granted and when restricted stock units vest.
Stock Options. The Company estimates the grant date fair values of stock options using the
Black-Scholes-Merton valuation model (Black-Scholes). Volatility assumptions are based on the
historic volatility of the Companys common stock over the most recent period equal to the expected
term of the options as of the date the options are granted. The expected term assumptions are
based on the Companys experience with respect to employee stock option activity. Dividend yield
assumptions are based on the expected dividends at the time the options are granted. The risk-free
interest rate assumptions are determined by reference to United States Treasury yields.
Weighted-average assumptions used to estimate the grant date fair values for stock options granted
in the three and six month periods ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 follow:
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Volatility |
50.02 | % | 35.74 | % | 49.91 | % | 35.73 | % | ||||||||
Expected term (in years) |
4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | 4.00 | ||||||||||||
Dividend yield |
1.52 | % | 1.64 | % | 1.68 | % | 1.68 | % | ||||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
1.68 | % | 2.92 | % | 1.66 | % | 2.94 | % |
7
Table of Contents
Stock option activity from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009 follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Underlying | Exercise | |||||||
Shares | Price | |||||||
Outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
5,933,572 | $ | 21.20 | |||||
Granted |
1,022,500 | $ | 13.11 | |||||
Exercised |
(47,600 | ) | $ | 5.69 | ||||
Expired |
| $ | | |||||
Outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
6,908,472 | $ | 20.11 | |||||
Exercisable at June 30, 2009 |
5,022,389 | $ | 20.74 | |||||
Restricted Stock. For all restricted stock awards to date, shares of common stock were issued
when the awards were made. Non-vested shares are subject to forfeiture for failure to fulfill
service conditions and, in certain cases, performance conditions. Non-forfeitable dividends are
paid on non-vested shares of restricted stock. For restricted stock awards made prior to 2008, the
Company used the graded-vesting attribution method to recognize periodic compensation cost over
the vesting period. For restricted stock awards made in 2008 and thereafter, the Company uses the
straight-line method to recognize periodic compensation cost over the vesting period.
Restricted stock activity from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009 follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Non-vested restricted stock outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
1,429,571 | $ | 28.49 | |||||
Granted |
588,600 | $ | 13.74 | |||||
Vested |
(526,947 | ) | $ | 28.26 | ||||
Forfeited |
(31,874 | ) | $ | 28.59 | ||||
Non-vested restricted stock outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
1,459,350 | $ | 22.62 | |||||
Restricted Stock Units. For all restricted stock unit awards made to date, shares of common
stock are not issued until the units vest. Restricted stock units are subject to forfeiture for
failure to fulfill service conditions. Non-forfeitable cash dividend equivalents are paid on
non-vested restricted stock units.
Restricted stock unit activity from January 1, 2009 to June 30, 2009 follows:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Non-vested restricted stock units outstanding at January 1, 2009 |
17,500 | $ | 31.60 | |||||
Granted |
6,500 | $ | 14.39 | |||||
Vested |
(5,833 | ) | $ | 31.60 | ||||
Forfeited |
| $ | | |||||
Non-vested restricted stock units outstanding at June 30, 2009 |
18,167 | $ | 25.44 | |||||
8
Table of Contents
3. Property and Equipment
Property and equipment consisted of the following at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in
thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Equipment |
$ | 3,151,517 | $ | 2,897,431 | ||||
Oil and natural gas properties |
89,117 | 89,809 | ||||||
Buildings |
65,271 | 61,529 | ||||||
Land |
10,220 | 10,196 | ||||||
3,316,125 | 3,058,965 | |||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and depletion |
(1,222,516 | ) | (1,121,853 | ) | ||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 2,093,609 | $ | 1,937,112 | ||||
4. Business Segments
The Companys revenues, operating profits and identifiable assets are primarily attributable
to four business segments: (i) contract drilling of oil and natural gas wells, (ii) pressure
pumping services, (iii) drilling and completion fluid services and (iv) the investment, on a
working interest basis, in oil and natural gas properties. Each of these segments represents a
distinct type of business based upon the type and nature of services and products offered. These
segments have separate management teams which report to the Companys chief operating decision
maker. The results of operations in these segments are regularly reviewed by the chief operating
decision maker for purposes of determining resource allocation and assessing performance. Separate
financial data for each of our four business segments is provided in the table below (in
thousands):
Three Months Ended | Six Months Ended | |||||||||||||||
June 30, | June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||
Revenues: |
||||||||||||||||
Contract drilling (a) |
$ | 101,917 | $ | 417,874 | $ | 327,739 | $ | 838,826 | ||||||||
Pressure pumping |
33,616 | 57,094 | 71,721 | 99,958 | ||||||||||||
Drilling and completion fluids (b) |
20,267 | 38,746 | 48,097 | 71,346 | ||||||||||||
Oil and natural gas |
5,165 | 13,609 | 9,565 | 22,600 | ||||||||||||
Total segment revenues |
160,965 | 527,323 | 457,122 | 1,032,730 | ||||||||||||
Elimination of intercompany revenues (a)(b) |
(201 | ) | (1,040 | ) | (319 | ) | (1,893 | ) | ||||||||
Total revenues |
$ | 160,764 | $ | 526,283 | $ | 456,803 | $ | 1,030,837 | ||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes: |
||||||||||||||||
Contract drilling |
$ | (14,885 | ) | $ | 106,795 | $ | 26,126 | $ | 225,181 | |||||||
Pressure pumping |
(898 | ) | 14,277 | (1,773 | ) | 18,729 | ||||||||||
Drilling and completion fluids |
(1,095 | ) | 4,055 | (577 | ) | 4,722 | ||||||||||
Oil and natural gas |
558 | 7,173 | (2,998 | ) | 11,470 | |||||||||||
(16,320 | ) | 132,300 | 20,778 | 260,102 | ||||||||||||
Corporate and other |
(10,646 | ) | (8,602 | ) | (21,861 | ) | (16,344 | ) | ||||||||
Net gain (loss) on asset disposals/retirements (c) |
(176 | ) | 2,721 | (350 | ) | 2,535 | ||||||||||
Interest income |
204 | 493 | 265 | 836 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense |
(839 | ) | (63 | ) | (1,286 | ) | (340 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
12 | 353 | 35 | 737 | ||||||||||||
Income (loss) before income taxes |
$ | (27,765 | ) | $ | 127,202 | $ | (2,419 | ) | $ | 247,526 | ||||||
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Identifiable assets: |
||||||||
Contract drilling |
$ | 2,116,820 | $ | 2,255,421 | ||||
Pressure pumping |
213,917 | 210,805 | ||||||
Drilling and completion fluids |
69,787 | 99,433 | ||||||
Oil and natural gas |
25,020 | 31,760 | ||||||
Corporate and other (d) |
225,807 | 115,398 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 2,651,351 | $ | 2,712,817 | ||||
(a) | Includes contract drilling intercompany revenues of approximately $201,000 and $1.0 million for the three months ended |
9
Table of Contents
June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. Includes contract drilling intercompany revenues of approximately $319,000 and $1.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. | ||
(b) | Includes drilling and completion fluids intercompany revenues of approximately $1,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2008. Includes drilling and completion fluids intercompany revenues of approximately $51,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2008. | |
(c) | Net gains or losses associated with the disposal or retirement of assets relate to decisions of the executive management group regarding corporate strategy. Accordingly, the related gains or losses have been separately presented and excluded from the results of specific segments. | |
(d) | Corporate and other assets primarily include cash on hand managed by the parent corporation and certain deferred Federal income tax assets. |
5. Goodwill
Goodwill is evaluated at least annually to determine if the fair value of recorded goodwill
has decreased below its carrying value. For purposes of impairment testing, goodwill is evaluated
at the reporting unit level. The Companys reporting units for impairment testing have been
determined to be its operating segments.
As
of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 the Company had
goodwill of $86.2 million, all in its
contract drilling reporting unit. In the event that market conditions remain weak, the Company may
be required to record an impairment of goodwill in its contract drilling reporting unit in the
future, and such impairment could be material.
6. Accrued Expenses
Accrued expenses consisted of the following at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008 (in
thousands):
June 30, | December 31, | |||||||
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Salaries, wages, payroll taxes and benefits |
$ | 11,417 | $ | 30,334 | ||||
Workers compensation liability |
67,367 | 70,439 | ||||||
Sales, use and other taxes |
12,784 | 12,015 | ||||||
Insurance, other than workers compensation |
13,397 | 14,209 | ||||||
Other |
3,638 | 5,658 | ||||||
$ | 108,603 | $ | 132,655 | |||||
7. Asset Retirement Obligation
Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 143, Accounting for Asset Retirement
Obligations, requires that the Company record a liability for the estimated costs to be incurred
in connection with the abandonment of oil and natural gas properties in the future. This liability
is included in the caption Other in the liabilities section of the Companys consolidated balance
sheet. The following table describes the changes to the Companys asset retirement obligations
during the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 (in thousands):
2009 | 2008 | |||||||
Balance at beginning of year |
$ | 3,047 | $ | 1,593 | ||||
Liabilities incurred |
93 | 261 | ||||||
Liabilities settled |
(172 | ) | (207 | ) | ||||
Accretion expense |
59 | 29 | ||||||
Revision in estimated costs of plugging oil and natural gas wells |
(14 | ) | 1,025 | |||||
Asset retirement obligation at end of period |
$ | 3,013 | $ | 2,701 | ||||
8. Borrowings Under Line of Credit
The Company entered into an unsecured revolving line of credit (LOC) on March 20, 2009 with
a maximum borrowing capacity of $220 million, including a letter of credit
sublimit of $150 million and a swing line sublimit of $40 million. In addition, the aggregate
borrowing and letter of credit capacity under the LOC may, subject to the terms and conditions set
forth therein
10
Table of Contents
including the receipt of additional commitments from lenders, be increased up to a maximum
amount not to exceed $450 million. On June 19, 2009, the Company entered into a Commitment
Increase and Joinder Agreement to increase the maximum borrowing capacity to $240 million.
Interest is paid on the outstanding principal amount of LOC borrowings at a floating rate
based on, at the Companys election, LIBOR or a base rate. The margin on LIBOR loans ranges from
3.00% to 4.00% and the margin on base rate loans ranges from 2.00% to 3.00%, based on the Companys
debt to capitalization ratio. At June 30, 2009, the margin on LIBOR loans would have been 3.00%
and the margin on base rate loans would have been 2.00%. Any outstanding borrowings must be repaid
at maturity on January 31, 2012 and letters of credit may remain in effect up to six months after
such maturity date. This LOC facility includes various fees, including a commitment fee on the
actual daily unused commitment (the commitment fee rate was 1.00% at June 30, 2009).
The Company incurred line of credit issuance costs of approximately $6.2 million during the
six months ended June 30, 2009 in connection with the LOC. These costs are being amortized over
the contractual term of the LOC as an adjustment to interest expense.
There are customary representations, warranties, restrictions and covenants associated with
the LOC. Financial covenants provide for a maximum debt to capitalization ratio and a minimum
interest coverage ratio. The Company does not expect that the restrictions and covenants will
impact its ability to operate or react to opportunities that might arise. As of June 30, 2009, the
Company had no borrowings outstanding under the LOC. The Company had $46.3 million in letters of
credit outstanding at June 30, 2009 and, as a result, had available borrowing capacity of
approximately $194 million at that date. Each domestic subsidiary of the Company has
unconditionally guaranteed the existing and future obligations of the Company and each other
guarantor under the LOC and related loan documents, as well as obligations of the Company and its
subsidiaries under any interest rate swap contracts that may be entered into with lenders party to the LOC.
9. Commitments, Contingencies and Other Matters
Commitments As of June 30, 2009, the Company maintained letters of credit in the aggregate
amount of $46.3 million for the benefit of various insurance companies as collateral for
retrospective premiums and retained losses which could become payable under the terms of the
underlying insurance contracts. These letters of credit expire at various times during the
calendar year and are typically renewed annually. As of June 30, 2009, no amounts had been drawn
under the letters of credit.
As of June 30, 2009, the Company had commitments to purchase approximately $154 million of
major equipment.
The Company is party to various legal proceedings arising in the normal course of its
business. The Company does not believe that the outcome of these proceedings, either individually
or in the aggregate, will have a material adverse effect on its financial condition, results of
operations or cash flows.
10. Stockholders Equity
Cash Dividends The Company paid cash dividends during the six months ended June 30, 2008 and
2009 as follows:
2008: | Per Share | Total | ||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Paid on March 28, 2008 |
$ | 0.12 | $ | 18,493 | ||||
Paid on June 27, 2008 |
0.16 | $ | 25,011 | |||||
Total cash dividends |
$ | 0.28 | $ | 43,504 | ||||
2009: | Per Share | Total | ||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Paid on March 31, 2009 |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 7,655 | ||||
Paid on June 30, 2009 |
0.05 | 7,675 | ||||||
Total cash dividends |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 15,330 | ||||
On July 29, 2009, the Companys Board of Directors approved a cash dividend on its common
stock in the amount of $0.05 per share to be paid on September 30, 2009 to holders of record as of
September 15, 2009. The amount and timing of all future dividend payments, if any, is subject to
the discretion of the Board of Directors and will depend upon business conditions, results of
operations, financial condition, terms of the Companys credit facilities and other factors.
11
Table of Contents
On August 1, 2007, the Companys Board of Directors approved a stock buyback program
(Program), authorizing purchases of up to $250 million of the Companys common stock in open
market or privately negotiated transactions. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, the
Company purchased 3,324 shares of its common stock under the Program at a cost of approximately
$46,000. As of June 30, 2009, the Company is authorized to purchase approximately $113 million of
the Companys outstanding common stock under the Program. Shares purchased under the Program are
accounted for as treasury stock.
The Company purchased 85,817 shares of stock from employees during the six months ended June
30, 2009 on dates that corresponded with the vesting of restricted stock. These shares were
purchased at fair market value to provide employees with the funds necessary to satisfy payroll tax
withholding obligations and have been accounted for as treasury stock. The total purchase price
for these shares was approximately $1.1 million. These purchases were made pursuant to the terms
of the Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and not pursuant to the Program.
11. Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements (FAS 157).
FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally
accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurement.
The initial application of FAS 157 was limited to financial assets and liabilities and
became effective on January 1, 2008 for the Company. The impact of the initial application
of FAS 157 was not material. On January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FAS 157 on a prospective
basis for non-financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on a
recurring basis. The application of FAS 157 to the Companys non-financial assets and
liabilities is primarily limited to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business
combination, asset retirement obligations and asset impairments, including goodwill and
long-lived assets. This application of FAS 157 has not had a material impact on the Company.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations (FAS 141(R))
and Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment
of ARB No. 51 (FAS 160). FAS 141(R) is a revision of Statement No. 141, Business Combinations,
and calls for significant changes from current practice in accounting for business combinations.
FAS 141(R) is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. FAS 160
amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Both FAS 141(R) and FAS 160 became effective for the
Company on January 1, 2009. The application of FAS 141(R) and FAS 160 did not have a material
impact on the Company.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF
03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that share-based payment awards that entitle their holders to
receive non-forfeitable dividends before vesting should be considered participating securities and,
as such, should be included in the calculation of basic earnings-per-share using the two-class
method. Certain of the Companys share-based payment awards entitle the holders to receive
non-forfeitable dividends. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal
years beginning after December 15, 2008, as well as interim periods within those years and became
effective for the Company on January 1, 2009. The impact of the adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 is
discussed in Note 1.
In December 2008, the SEC issued a Final Rule, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting (Final
Rule). The Final Rule revises certain oil and gas reporting disclosures in Regulation S-K and
Regulation S-X under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the Securities Act) and the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), as well as Industry Guide 2. The
amendments are designed to modernize and update oil and gas disclosure requirements to align them
with current practices and changes in technology. The disclosure requirements are effective for
registration statements filed on or after January 1, 2010 and for annual financial statements filed
on or after December 31, 2009. The Company is currently evaluating the impact that the Final Rule
may have on its consolidated financial statements.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position
No. 157-4, Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level
of Activity for the Asset or Liability Have Significantly Decreased
and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 provides additional
guidance for determining whether a market for a financial asset is not active and a transaction is
not distressed for fair value measurements under FAS 157. The provisions of this FSP are effective
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and
became effective for the Company in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of FSP 157-4 did
not have a material impact on the Company.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1). This FSP increases the
frequency of fair value disclosures as required by FAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, from annual only to quarterly reporting periods. The provisions of this FSP
are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15,
2009 and became effective for the Company in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of FSP
107-1 did not have a material impact on the Company.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments
to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FAS 167). FAS 167 retains the scope of FASB Interpretation No.
46(R) with the addition of entities previously considered qualifying special-purpose entities and
requires ongoing reassessments of whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity. Before this Statement, FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) required reconsideration of
whether an enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity only when specific
events occurred. FAS 167 is effective as of the beginning of each
12
Table of Contents
reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after November 15, 2009, for
interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim and annual reporting
periods thereafter and will become effective for the Company on January 1, 2010. The adoption of
FAS 167 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (FAS 168). On the effective date of FAS 168, the FASB
Accounitng Standards Codification (Codification) will become the source of authoritative U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. Following FAS 168, the FASB will not issue new standards
in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or EITF Abstracts. Instead, it will issue
Accounting Standards Updates to update the Codification. FAS 168 is effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and will be
effective for the Company in the quarter ending September 30, 2009. The adoption of FAS 168 will
not have a material impact on the Company.
13
Table of Contents
ITEM 2. Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Management Overview We are a leading provider of contract services to the North American
oil and natural gas industry. Our services primarily involve the drilling, on a contract basis, of
land-based oil and natural gas wells and, to a lesser extent, we provide pressure pumping services
and drilling and completion fluid services. In addition to the aforementioned contract services,
we also invest, on a working interest basis, in oil and natural gas properties. For the three and
six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, our operating revenues consisted of the following (dollars
in thousands):
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
2009 | 2008 | 2009 | 2008 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Contract drilling |
$ | 101,716 | 63 | % | $ | 416,835 | 79 | % | $ | 327,420 | 72 | % | $ | 836,984 | 81 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Pressure pumping |
33,616 | 21 | 57,094 | 11 | 71,721 | 16 | 99,958 | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Drilling and completion fluids |
20,267 | 13 | 38,745 | 7 | 48,097 | 10 | 71,295 | 7 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Oil and natural gas |
5,165 | 3 | 13,609 | 3 | 9,565 | 2 | 22,600 | 2 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
$ | 160,764 | 100 | % | $ | 526,283 | 100 | % | $ | 456,803 | 100 | % | $ | 1,030,837 | 100 | % | |||||||||||||||||
We provide our contract services to oil and natural gas operators in many of the oil and
natural gas producing regions of North America. Our contract drilling operations are focused in
various regions of Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama,
Colorado, Arizona, Utah, Wyoming, Montana, North Dakota, South Dakota, Pennsylvania, West Virginia
and western Canada, while our pressure pumping services are focused primarily in the Appalachian
Basin. Our drilling and completion fluids services are provided to operators offshore in the Gulf
of Mexico and on land in Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Louisiana. The oil and natural gas
properties in which we hold interests are primarily located in Texas, New Mexico, Mississippi and
Louisiana.
Typically, the profitability of our business is most readily assessed by two primary
indicators in our contract drilling segment: our average number of rigs operating and our average
revenue per operating day. During the second quarter of 2009, our average number of rigs operating
was 63 compared to 244 in the second quarter of 2008. Our average number of rigs operating during
the second quarter of 2009 included approximately seven rigs under term contracts that earned
standby revenues of $7.5 million. Rigs on standby earn a discounted dayrate since they do not have
crews and have lower costs. Additionally, we recognized $901,000 of revenues during the second
quarter of 2009 from the early termination of term contracts. Our average revenue per operating
day was $17,780 in the second quarter of 2009 compared to $18,740 in the second quarter of 2008.
We had a consolidated net loss of $17.7 million for the second quarter of 2009 compared to
consolidated net income of $81.4 million for the second quarter of 2008. This decrease was
primarily due to our contract drilling segment experiencing a significant decrease in the average
number of rigs operating as compared to the second quarter of 2008.
Our revenues, profitability and cash flows are highly dependent upon prevailing prices for
natural gas and, to a lesser extent, oil. During periods of improved commodity prices, the capital
spending budgets of oil and natural gas operators tend to expand, which generally results in
increased demand for our contract services. Conversely, in periods when these commodity prices
deteriorate, the demand for our contract services generally weakens and we experience downward
pressure on pricing for our services. Since reaching a peak in 2008, there has been a significant
decline in oil and natural gas prices. During this time there has also been a substantial
deterioration in the global economic environment. As part of this deterioration, there has been
substantial uncertainty in the capital markets and access to financing has been reduced. Due to
these conditions, our customers have reduced or curtailed their drilling programs, which has
resulted in a decrease in demand for our services, as evidenced by the decline in our monthly
average of rigs operating from a high of 283 in October 2008 to 60 in June 2009. Furthermore, these
factors could result in certain of our customers experiencing an inability to pay suppliers,
including us, if they are not able to access capital to fund their operations. We are also highly
impacted by competition, the availability of excess equipment, labor issues and various other
factors that could materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, cash flows and
results of operations. Please see Risk Factors included as Item 1A in our Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
We believe that the liquidity shown on our balance sheet as of June 30, 2009, which includes
approximately $230 million in working capital (including $168 million in cash and cash equivalents)
and approximately $194 million available under our current $240 million line of credit, together
with cash expected to be generated from operations, should provide us with sufficient ability to
fund our current plans to build new equipment, make improvements to our existing equipment, expand
into new regions, pay cash dividends and survive the current downturn in our industry.
Commitments and Contingencies As of June 30, 2009, we maintained letters of credit in the
aggregate amount of $46.3 million for the benefit of various insurance companies as collateral for
retrospective premiums and retained losses which could become payable under the terms of the
underlying insurance contracts. These letters of credit expire at various times during each
calendar year and are typically renewed annually. As of June 30, 2009, no amounts had been drawn
under the letters of credit.
14
Table of Contents
As of June 30, 2009, we had commitments to purchase approximately $154 million of major
equipment.
Trading and Investing We have not engaged in trading activities that include high-risk
securities, such as derivatives and non-exchange traded contracts. We invest cash primarily in
highly liquid, short-term investments such as overnight deposits and money market accounts.
Description of Business We conduct our contract drilling operations in Texas, New Mexico,
Oklahoma, Arkansas, Louisiana, Mississippi, Alabama, Colorado, Arizona, Utah, Wyoming, Montana,
North Dakota, South Dakota, Pennsylvania, West Virginia and western Canada. As of June 30, 2009,
we had approximately 350 marketable land-based drilling rigs. We provide pressure pumping services
to oil and natural gas operators primarily in the Appalachian Basin. These services consist
primarily of well stimulation and cementing for completion of new wells and remedial work on
existing wells. We provide drilling fluids, completion fluids and related services to oil and
natural gas operators offshore in the Gulf of Mexico and on land in Texas, New Mexico, Oklahoma and
Louisiana. Drilling and completion fluids are used by oil and natural gas operators during the
drilling process to control pressure when drilling oil and natural gas wells. We also invest, on a
working interest basis, in oil and natural gas properties.
The North American land drilling industry has experienced periods of downturn in demand during
the last decade. During these periods, there have been substantially more drilling rigs available
than necessary to meet demand. As a result, drilling contractors have had difficulty sustaining
profit margins and, at times, have incurred losses during the downturn periods.
In addition to adverse effects that declines in demand have had or could have on us, ongoing
factors which could continue to adversely affect utilization rates and pricing, even in an
environment of high oil and natural gas prices and increased drilling activity, include:
| movement of drilling rigs from region to region, | ||
| reactivation of land-based drilling rigs, or | ||
| construction of new drilling rigs. |
As a result of an increase in drilling activity and increased prices for drilling services in
recent years prior to the current downturn, construction of new drilling rigs increased
significantly. The addition of new drilling rigs to the market and the recent decrease in demand
has resulted in excess capacity. We cannot predict either the future level of demand for our
contract drilling services or future conditions in the oil and natural gas contract drilling
business.
Critical Accounting Policies
In addition to established accounting policies, our consolidated financial statements are
impacted by certain estimates and assumptions made by management. No changes in our critical
accounting policies have occurred since the filing of the Companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for
the fiscal year ended December 31, 2008.
Liquidity and Capital Resources
As of June 30, 2009, we had working capital of $230 million, including cash and cash
equivalents of $168 million. For the six months ended June 30, 2009, our sources of cash flow
included $355 million from operating activities.
During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we used $15.3 million to pay dividends on our
common stock, $6.2 million to pay issuance costs related to our LOC and $247 million:
| to build new drilling rigs, | ||
| to make capital expenditures for the betterment and refurbishment of our drilling rigs, | ||
| to acquire and procure drilling equipment and facilities to support our drilling operations, | ||
| to fund capital expenditures for our pressure pumping and drilling and completion fluids segments, and | ||
| to fund investments in oil and natural gas properties on a working interest basis. |
15
Table of Contents
We paid cash dividends during the six months ended June 30, 2009 as follows:
Per Share | Total | |||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||
Paid on March 31, 2009 |
$ | 0.05 | $ | 7,655 | ||||
Paid on June 30, 2009 |
0.05 | 7,675 | ||||||
Total cash dividends |
$ | 0.10 | $ | 15,330 | ||||
On July 29, 2009, our Board of Directors approved a cash dividend on our common stock in the
amount of $0.05 per share to be paid on September 30, 2009 to holders of record as of September 15,
2009. The amount and timing of all future dividend payments, if any, is subject to the discretion
of the Board of Directors and will depend upon business conditions, results of operations,
financial condition, terms of our credit facilities and other factors.
On August 1, 2007, our Board of Directors approved a stock buyback program (Program),
authorizing purchases of up to $250 million of our common stock in open market or privately
negotiated transactions. During the six months ended June 30, 2009, we purchased 3,324 shares of
our common stock under the Program at a cost of approximately $46,000. As of June 30, 2009, we are
authorized to purchase approximately $113 million of our outstanding common stock under the
Program. Shares purchased under the Program have been accounted for as treasury stock.
We have an unsecured revolving line of credit with a maximum borrowing and letter of credit
capacity of $240 million. Interest is paid on the outstanding principal amount of borrowings under
the revolving line of credit at a floating rate based on, at our election, LIBOR or a base rate.
The margin on LIBOR loans ranges from 3.00% to 4.00% and the margin on base rate loans ranges from
2.00% to 3.00%, based on our debt to capitalization ratio. Any outstanding borrowings must be
repaid at maturity on January 31, 2012 and letters of credit may remain in effect up to six months
after such maturity date. As of June 30, 2009, we had no borrowings outstanding under this
revolving line of credit. We had $46.3 million in letters of credit outstanding at June 30, 2009
and, as a result, had available borrowing capacity of approximately $194 million at such date.
We believe that the current level of cash, short-term investments and borrowing capacity
available under our current revolving line of credit, together with cash expected to be generated
from operations, should be sufficient to meet our current capital needs. From time to time,
acquisition opportunities are evaluated. The timing, size or success of any acquisition and the
associated capital commitments are unpredictable. Should opportunities for growth requiring
capital arise, we believe we would be able to satisfy these needs through a combination of working
capital, cash generated from operations, borrowing capacity under our existing LOC or additional
debt or equity financing. However, there can be no assurance that such capital will be available
on reasonable terms, if at all.
Results of Operations
The following tables summarize operations by business segment for the three months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008:
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
Contract Drilling | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 101,716 | $ | 416,835 | (75.6 | )% | ||||||
Direct operating costs |
$ | 56,950 | $ | 251,381 | (77.3 | )% | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 1,096 | $ | 1,297 | (15.5 | )% | ||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 58,555 | $ | 57,362 | 2.1 | % | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | (14,885 | ) | $ | 106,795 | N/M | ||||||
Operating days |
5,720 | 22,245 | (74.3 | )% | ||||||||
Average revenue per operating day |
$ | 17.78 | $ | 18.74 | (5.1 | )% | ||||||
Average direct operating costs per operating day |
$ | 9.96 | $ | 11.30 | (11.9 | )% | ||||||
Average rigs operating |
63 | 244 | (74.2 | )% | ||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 148,447 | $ | 67,815 | 118.9 | % |
Revenues and direct operating costs decreased in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the
second quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of a decrease in the number of operating days. The
decrease in operating days was due to decreased demand largely caused by lower commodity prices for
natural gas and oil. Our average number of rigs operating during the second quarter of 2009
included an average of approximately seven rigs that earned standby
revenues of $7.5 million. Rigs on standby earn a discounted
dayrate as they do not have crews
and have lower costs. Additionally, we recognized $901,000 of revenues during the second quarter
of 2009 from the early termination of drilling contracts. Excluding the impact of standby revenues
and the
16
Table of Contents
early termination of drilling contracts, average revenue per operating day decreased in the
second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008 primarily due to decreases in
dayrates for rigs that were operating in the spot market and the
expiration of term contracts that were at higher rates. Average direct operating costs per
operating day decreased in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008
primarily due to decreases in labor and repair costs as well as the impact of rigs earning standby
revenues for which no crews were maintained in the second quarter of 2009. Significant capital
expenditures have been incurred to build new drilling rigs, to modify and upgrade our drilling rigs
and to acquire additional related equipment such as drill pipe, drill collars, engines, fluid
circulating systems, rig hoisting systems and safety enhancement equipment.
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
Pressure Pumping | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 33,616 | $ | 57,094 | (41.1 | )% | ||||||
Direct operating costs |
$ | 22,862 | $ | 32,506 | (29.7 | )% | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 4,964 | $ | 5,834 | (14.9 | )% | ||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 6,688 | $ | 4,477 | 49.4 | % | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | (898 | ) | $ | 14,277 | N/M | ||||||
Total jobs |
1,681 | 3,400 | (50.6 | )% | ||||||||
Average revenue per job |
$ | 20.00 | $ | 16.79 | 19.1 | % | ||||||
Average direct operating costs per job |
$ | 13.60 | $ | 9.56 | 42.3 | % | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 6,753 | $ | 17,689 | (61.8 | )% |
Our customers have increased their focus on the emerging development of unconventional
reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin and the larger jobs associated therewith. As a result of this
focus on unconventional reservoirs and declining commodity prices, we have experienced a decrease
in the number of smaller traditional pressure pumping jobs, which has contributed to the overall
decrease in the number of total jobs. Revenues and direct operating costs decreased as a result of
a decrease in the number of total jobs. Increased average revenue per job was due to an increase
in the proportion of larger jobs to total jobs, which was driven by demand for services associated
with unconventional reservoirs partially offset by the impact of
reduced pricing.
Average direct operating costs per job increased due to the increase
in larger jobs and as a result of fixed costs being spread over a
significantly reduced number of jobs. In anticipation of increased activity associated with the
unconventional reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin, we have added facilities, equipment and
personnel in recent years. Delays in the development of these reservoirs and lower commodity
prices have caused less demand for our pressure pumping services, negatively
impacting the profitability of this business. Selling, general and administrative expenses
decreased in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008 primarily due to
headcount reductions. Significant capital expenditures
have been incurred to add capacity and modify and upgrade existing equipment. The increase in
depreciation expense is a result of these capital expenditures.
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
Drilling and Completion Fluids | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 20,267 | $ | 38,745 | (47.7 | )% | ||||||
Direct operating costs |
$ | 19,005 | $ | 31,449 | (39.6 | )% | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 1,757 | $ | 2,517 | (30.2 | )% | ||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 600 | $ | 724 | (17.1 | )% | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | (1,095 | ) | $ | 4,055 | N/M | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | | $ | 1,525 | (100.0 | )% |
Revenues and direct operating costs decreased in the second quarter of 2009 compared to the
second quarter of 2008 due to decreased sales volume both on land and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in the second quarter of 2009 compared to
the second quarter of 2008 primarily due to a decrease in compensation costs for sales and support
personnel due to headcount reductions.
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
Oil and Natural Gas Production and Exploration | (Dollars in thousands, | |||||||||||
except sales prices) | ||||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 5,165 | $ | 13,609 | (62.0 | )% | ||||||
Direct operating costs |
$ | 1,820 | $ | 3,529 | (48.4 | )% | ||||||
Depreciation, depletion and impairment |
$ | 2,787 | $ | 2,907 | (4.1 | )% | ||||||
Operating income |
$ | 558 | $ | 7,173 | (92.2 | )% | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 1,551 | $ | 4,527 | (65.7 | )% | ||||||
Average net daily oil production (Bbls) |
753 | 814 | (7.5 | )% | ||||||||
Average net daily natural gas production (Mcf) |
3,478 | 4,126 | (15.7 | )% | ||||||||
Average oil sales price (per Bbl) |
$ | 57.30 | $ | 123.71 | (53.7 | )% | ||||||
Average natural gas sales price (per Mcf) |
$ | 3.92 | $ | 11.85 | (66.9 | )% |
17
Table of Contents
Revenues decreased due to lower average sales prices and net daily production of oil and
natural gas. Average net daily oil and natural gas production decreased primarily due to
production declines on existing wells. Depreciation, depletion and impairment expense in the
second quarter of 2009 includes approximately $600,000 incurred to impair certain oil and natural
gas properties compared to approximately $79,000 incurred to impair certain oil and natural gas
properties in the second quarter of 2008. The increase in impairment charges in 2009 was due to a
reduction in commodity price expectations and a decline in production of certain wells. Depletion
expense decreased approximately $609,000 primarily due to the impact of decreases in carrying value
of properties resulting from impairment charges recognized prior to the second quarter of 2009.
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
Corporate and Other | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 8,419 | $ | 8,099 | 4.0 | % | ||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 227 | $ | 203 | 11.8 | % | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
$ | 2,000 | $ | 300 | 566.7 | % | ||||||
Net loss (gain) on asset disposals/retirements |
$ | 176 | $ | (2,721 | ) | N/M | ||||||
Interest income |
$ | 204 | $ | 493 | (58.6 | )% | ||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 839 | $ | 63 | 1,231.7 | % | ||||||
Other income |
$ | 12 | $ | 353 | (96.6 | )% |
Selling, general and administrative expenses increased in the second quarter of 2009 compared
to the second quarter of 2008 primarily as a result of increased
professional fees and increased non-cash stock based compensation. Other
operating expenses increased due to an increase in bad debt expense of $1.7 million in the second
quarter of 2009 compared to the second quarter of 2008. Gains and losses on the disposal and
retirement of assets are treated as part of our corporate
activities because such
transactions relate to corporate strategy decisions of the
Companys executive management group.
In the second quarter of 2008 we recognized a net gain on the disposal of assets of approximately
$2.7 million primarily due to the sale of certain assets in our
contract drilling segment.
Interest expense increased in the second quarter of 2009 compared to
the second quarter of 2008 due to amortization of LOC issuance costs
and increased fees associated with the unused portion of the LOC.
The following tables summarize operations by business segment for the six months ended June
30, 2009 and 2008:
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
Contract Drilling | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 327,420 | $ | 836,984 | (60.9 | )% | ||||||
Direct operating costs |
$ | 183,271 | $ | 495,748 | (63.0 | )% | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 2,082 | $ | 2,821 | (26.2 | )% | ||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 115,941 | $ | 113,234 | 2.4 | % | ||||||
Operating income |
$ | 26,126 | $ | 225,181 | (88.4 | )% | ||||||
Operating days |
17,193 | 44,478 | (61.3 | )% | ||||||||
Average revenue per operating day |
$ | 19.04 | $ | 18.82 | 1.2 | % | ||||||
Average direct operating costs per operating day |
$ | 10.66 | $ | 11.15 | (4.4 | )% | ||||||
Average rigs operating |
95 | 244 | (61.1 | )% | ||||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 215,449 | $ | 135,026 | 59.6 | % |
Revenues and direct operating costs decreased in the first six months of 2009 compared to the
first six months of 2008 primarily as a result of a decrease in the number of operating days. The
decrease in operating days was due to decreased demand largely caused by lower commodity prices for
natural gas and oil. Our average number of rigs operating during the first six months of 2009
included an average of approximately nine rigs that earned standby
revenues of $18.1 million. Rigs on standby earn a discounted
dayrate as they do not have crews
and have lower costs. Additionally, we recognized $7.5 million of revenues during the first six
months of 2009 from the early termination of drilling contracts. Average direct operating
costs per operating day decreased in the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six months
of 2008 primarily due to decreases in labor and repair costs as well as the impact of rigs earning
standby revenues for which no crews were maintained in the first six months of 2009. Selling,
general and administrative expenses decreased in the first six months of 2009 compared to the first
six months of 2008 primarily as a result of lower professional fees
and headcount reductions. Significant capital
expenditures have been incurred to build new drilling rigs, to modify and upgrade our drilling rigs
and to acquire additional related equipment such as drill pipe, drill collars, engines, fluid
circulating systems, rig hoisting systems and safety enhancement equipment.
18
Table of Contents
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
Pressure Pumping | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 71,721 | $ | 99,958 | (28.2 | )% | ||||||
Direct operating costs |
$ | 49,868 | $ | 61,011 | (18.3 | )% | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 10,799 | $ | 11,441 | (5.6 | )% | ||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 12,827 | $ | 8,777 | 46.1 | % | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | (1,773 | ) | $ | 18,729 | N/M | ||||||
Total jobs |
3,592 | 6,311 | (43.1 | )% | ||||||||
Average revenue per job |
$ | 19.97 | $ | 15.84 | 26.1 | % | ||||||
Average direct operating costs per job |
$ | 13.88 | $ | 9.67 | 43.5 | % | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 28,573 | $ | 30,648 | (6.8 | )% |
Our customers have increased their focus on the emerging development of unconventional
reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin and the larger jobs associated therewith. As a result of this
focus on unconventional reservoirs and declining commodity prices, we have experienced a decrease
in the number of smaller traditional pressure pumping jobs, which has contributed to the overall
decrease in the number of total jobs. Revenues and direct operating costs decreased as a result of
a decrease in the number of total jobs. Increased average revenue per job was due to an increase
in the proportion of larger jobs to total jobs, which was driven by demand for services associated
with unconventional reservoirs partially offset by the impact of
reduced pricing.
Average direct operating costs per job increased due to the increase
in larger jobs and as a result of fixed costs being spread over a
significantly reduced number of jobs. In anticipation of increased activity associated with the
unconventional reservoirs in the Appalachian Basin, we have added facilities, equipment and
personnel in recent years. Delays in the development of these reservoirs and lower
commodity prices have caused less demand for our pressure pumping services,
negatively impacting the profitability of this business. Significant capital expenditures have
been incurred to add capacity, expand our areas of operation and modify and upgrade existing
equipment. The increase in depreciation expense is a result of these capital expenditures.
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
Drilling and Completion Fluids | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 48,097 | $ | 71,295 | (32.5 | )% | ||||||
Direct operating costs |
$ | 43,527 | $ | 59,982 | (27.4 | )% | ||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 3,932 | $ | 5,143 | (23.5 | )% | ||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 1,215 | $ | 1,448 | (16.1 | )% | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | (577 | ) | $ | 4,722 | N/M | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 6 | $ | 1,533 | (99.6 | )% |
Revenues and direct operating costs decreased in the first six months of 2009 compared to the
first six months of 2008 due to decreased sales volume both on land and offshore in the Gulf of Mexico.
Selling, general and administrative expenses decreased in the first six months of 2009 compared to
the first six months of 2008 primarily due to a decrease in compensation costs for sales and
support personnel due to headcount reductions.
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
(Dollars in thousands, | ||||||||||||
Oil and Natural Gas Production and Exploration | except sales prices) | |||||||||||
Revenues |
$ | 9,565 | $ | 22,600 | (57.7 | )% | ||||||
Direct operating costs |
$ | 3,796 | $ | 5,596 | (32.2 | )% | ||||||
Depreciation, depletion and impairment |
$ | 8,767 | $ | 5,534 | 58.4 | % | ||||||
Operating income (loss) |
$ | (2,998 | ) | $ | 11,470 | N/M | ||||||
Capital expenditures |
$ | 2,521 | $ | 8,955 | (71.8 | )% | ||||||
Average net daily oil production (Bbls) |
817 | 758 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||
Average net daily natural gas production (Mcf) |
3,493 | 3,776 | (7.5 | )% | ||||||||
Average oil sales price (per Bbl) |
$ | 47.74 | $ | 111.23 | (57.1 | )% | ||||||
Average natural gas sales price (per Mcf) |
$ | 3.96 | $ | 10.57 | (62.5 | )% |
Revenues decreased primarily due to lower average sales prices of oil and natural gas.
Average net daily oil production increased due to the addition of new wells. Average net daily
natural gas production decreased primarily due to production declines on existing wells.
Depreciation, depletion and impairment expense in the first six months of 2009 includes
approximately $3.1 million incurred to impair certain oil and natural gas properties compared to
approximately $300,000 incurred to impair certain oil and natural gas properties in the first six
months of 2008. The increase in impairment charges in 2009 was due to a reduction in commodity
price expectations and a decline in production of certain wells. Depletion expense increased
approximately $518,000 due to lower reserves, which resulted from decreased oil and natural gas
commodity prices.
19
Table of Contents
2009 | 2008 | %Change | ||||||||||
Corporate and Other | (Dollars in thousands) | |||||||||||
Selling, general and administrative |
$ | 15,407 | $ | 15,338 | 0.4 | % | ||||||
Depreciation |
$ | 454 | $ | 406 | 11.8 | % | ||||||
Other operating expenses |
$ | 6,000 | $ | 600 | 900.0 | % | ||||||
Net loss (gain) on asset disposals/retirements |
$ | 350 | $ | (2,535 | ) | N/M | ||||||
Interest income |
$ | 265 | $ | 836 | (68.3 | )% | ||||||
Interest expense |
$ | 1,286 | $ | 340 | 278.2 | % | ||||||
Other income |
$ | 35 | $ | 737 | (95.3 | )% |
Other operating expenses increased due to an increase in bad debt expense of $5.4 million in
the first six months of 2009 compared to the first six months of 2008. Gains and losses on the
disposal and retirement of assets are treated as part of our
corporate activities because such transactions relate to corporate strategy decisions of
the Companys executive management group. In the first six months of 2008 we recognized a net gain on the disposal of
assets of approximately $2.5 million primarily due to the sale of certain assets in our contract
drilling segment. Interest expense increased in the first six months of
2009 compared to the first six months of 2008 due to amortization of
LOC issuance costs and increased fees associated with the unused
portion of the LOC.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In September 2006, the
FASB issued Statement No. 157, Fair Value Measurements (FAS 157). FAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a
framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted accounting principles, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurement. The initial application of FAS 157 was limited to financial assets and liabilities and
became effective on January 1, 2008 for us.
The impact of the initial application of FAS 157 was not material. On January 1, 2009, we adopted FAS 157 on
a prospective basis for non-financial assets and liabilities that are not measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The application of FAS 157 to our non-financial assets and liabilities is primarily limited to assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination, asset retirement obligations and asset impairments, including goodwill and long-lived assets.
This application of FAS 157 has not had a material impact on us.
In December 2007, the FASB issued Statement No. 141(R), Business Combinations (FAS 141(R))
and Statement No. 160, Noncontrolling Interests in Consolidated Financial Statements, an amendment
of ARB No. 51 (FAS 160). FAS 141(R) is a revision of Statement No. 141, Business Combinations,
and calls for significant changes from current practice in accounting for business combinations.
FAS 141(R) is effective for business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the
beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. FAS 160
amends ARB 51 to establish accounting and reporting standards for the non-controlling interest in a
subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a subsidiary. FAS 160 is effective for fiscal years
beginning on or after December 15, 2008. Both FAS 141(R) and FAS 160 became effective for us on
January 1, 2009. The application of FAS 141(R) and FAS 160 did
not have a material impact on us.
In June 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. EITF 03-6-1, Determining Whether
Instruments Granted in Share-Based Payment Transactions Are Participating Securities (FSP EITF
03-6-1). FSP EITF 03-6-1 clarifies that share-based payment awards that entitle their holders to
receive non-forfeitable dividends before vesting should be considered participating securities and,
as such, should be included in the calculation of basic earnings-per-share using the two-class
method. Certain of our share-based payment awards entitle the holders to receive non-forfeitable
dividends. FSP EITF 03-6-1 is effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning
after December 15, 2008, as well as interim periods within those years and became effective for us
on January 1, 2009. The adoption of FSP EITF 03-6-1 has not had
a material impact on us.
In December 2008, the SEC issued a final rule, Modernization of Oil and Gas Reporting (Final
Rule). The Final Rule revises certain oil and gas reporting disclosures in Regulation S-K and
Regulation S-X under the Securities Act and the Exchange Act, as well as Industry Guide 2. The
amendments are designed to modernize and update oil and gas disclosure requirements to align them
with current practices and changes in technology. The disclosure requirements are effective for
registration statements filed on or after January 1, 2010 and for annual financial statements filed
on or after December 31, 2009. We are currently evaluating the impact that the Final Rule may have
on our consolidated financial statements.
In
April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 157-4,
Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for
the Asset or Liability Have significantly Decreased and Identifying
Transactions That Are Not Orderly. (FSP 157-4). FSP 157-4 provides additional
guidance for determining whether a market for a financial asset is not active and a transaction is
not distressed for fair value measurements under FAS 157. The provisions of this FSP are effective
for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009 and
became effective for us in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of FSP 157-4 did not have
a material impact on us.
In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position No. 107-1 and APB No. 28-1, Interim
Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments (FSP 107-1). This FSP increases the
frequency of fair value disclosures as required by FAS 107, Disclosures about Fair Value of
Financial Instruments, from annual only to quarterly reporting periods. The provisions of this FSP
are effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after June 15,
2009 and became effective for us in the quarter ended June 30, 2009. The adoption of FSP 107-1 did
not have a material impact on us.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 167, Amendments
to FASB Interpretation No. 46(R) (FAS 167). FAS 167 retains the scope of FASB Interpretation No.
46(R) with the addition of entities previously considered
20
Table of Contents
qualifying special-purpose entities and requires ongoing reassessments of whether an
enterprise is the primary beneficiary of a variable interest entity. Before this Statement, FASB
Interpretation No. 46(R) required reconsideration of whether an enterprise is the primary
beneficiary of a variable interest entity only when specific events occurred. FAS 167 is effective
as of the beginning of each reporting entitys first annual reporting period that begins after
November 15, 2009, for interim periods within that first annual reporting period, and for interim
and annual reporting periods thereafter and will become effective for us on January 1, 2010. The
adoption of FAS 167 is not expected to have a material impact on us.
In June 2009, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 168, The FASB
Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles
a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162 (FAS 168). On the effective date of FAS 168, the FASB
Accounitng Standards Codification (Codification) will become the source of authoritative U.S.
generally accepted accounting principles. Following FAS 168, the FASB will not issue new standards
in the form of Statements, FASB Staff Positions or EITF Abstracts. Instead, it will issue
Accounting Standards Updates to update the Codification. FAS 168 is effective for financial
statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009 and will be
effective for us in the quarter ending September 30, 2009. The adoption of FAS 168 will not have a
material impact on us.
Volatility of Oil and Natural Gas Prices and its Impact on Operations and Financial Condition
Our revenue, profitability, financial condition and rate of growth are substantially dependent
upon prevailing prices for natural gas and, to a lesser extent, oil. For many years, oil and
natural gas prices and markets have been extremely volatile. Prices are affected by market supply
and demand factors as well as international military, political and economic conditions, and the
ability of OPEC to set and maintain production and price targets. All of these factors are beyond
our control. During 2008, the monthly average market price of natural gas peaked in June at $13.06
per Mcf before rapidly declining to an average of $5.99 per Mcf in December. In 2009, the
average market price of natural gas declined further to an average
of $3.91 per Mcf in the month of June. This has resulted in our
customers significantly reducing their drilling activities beginning in the fourth quarter of 2008
and continuing into 2009. This reduction in demand combined with the reactivation and construction
of new land drilling rigs in the United States during the last several years has resulted in excess
capacity compared to demand. As a result of these factors, our average number of rigs operating
has declined significantly. We expect oil and natural gas prices to continue to be volatile and to
affect our financial condition, operations and ability to access sources of capital. Continued low
market prices for natural gas will likely result in demand for our drilling rigs remaining low and
adversely affect our operating results, financial condition and cash flows.
The North American land drilling industry has experienced downturns in demand during the last
decade. During these periods, there have been substantially more drilling rigs available than
necessary to meet demand. As a result, drilling contractors have had difficulty sustaining profit
margins and, at times, have incurred losses during the downturn periods.
ITEM 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
We currently have exposure to interest rate market risk associated with any borrowings that we
have under our LOC. The LOC calls for periodic interest payments at a floating rate ranging from
LIBOR plus 3.00% to 4.00% or at a base rate plus 2.00% to 3.00%. The applicable rate above LIBOR
or the prime rate is based upon our debt to capitalization ratio. As of June 30, 2009, we had no
borrowings outstanding under our LOC.
We conduct a portion of our business in Canadian dollars through our Canadian land-based
drilling operations. The exchange rate between Canadian dollars and U.S. dollars has fluctuated
during the last several years. If the value of the Canadian dollar against the U.S. dollar
weakens, revenues and earnings of our Canadian operations will be reduced and the value of our
Canadian net assets will decline when they are translated to U.S. dollars. This currency rate risk
is not material to our results of operations or financial condition.
The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, trade receivables and accounts payable
approximate fair value.
ITEM 4. Controls and Procedures
Disclosure Controls and Procedures We maintain disclosure controls and procedures (as such
terms are defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) promulgated under the Exchange Act), designed to
ensure that the information required to be disclosed in the reports that we file with the SEC under
the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the SECs rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), as appropriate, to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
21
Table of Contents
Under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our CEO and CFO,
we conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the
end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, our CEO
and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of June 30, 2009.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting There were no changes in our internal
control over financial reporting during our most recently completed fiscal quarter that have
materially affected or are reasonably likely to materially affect our internal control over
financial reporting, as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act.
FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS AND CAUTIONARY STATEMENTS FOR PURPOSES OF
THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
THE SAFE HARBOR PROVISIONS OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES
LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995
Forward-looking statements may be made by management orally or in writing, including, but not
limited to our filings with the SEC under the Exchange Act and the Securities Act. Managements
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations included in Item 2 of
Part I of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q contains forward-looking statements which are made
pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995.
These statements include, without limitation, statements relating to: liquidity; financing of
operations; continued volatility of oil and natural gas prices; source and sufficiency of funds
required for immediate capital needs and additional rig acquisitions (if further opportunities
arise); demand for our services; and other matters. Our forward-looking statements can be
identified by the fact that they do not relate strictly to historic or current facts and often use
words such as believes, budgeted, expects, estimates, project, will, could, may,
plans, intends, strategy, or anticipates, and other words and expressions of similar
meaning. The forward-looking statements are based on certain assumptions and analyses we make in
light of our experience and our perception of historical trends, current conditions, expected
future developments and other factors we believe are appropriate in the circumstances. Although we
believe that the expectations reflected in such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we can
give no assurance that such expectations will prove to have been correct.
Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and a variety of factors
could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated or expected results expressed
in or suggested by these forward-looking statements. Factors that might cause or contribute to
such differences include, but are not limited to, deterioration of global economic conditions,
declines in oil and natural gas prices that could adversely affect demand for our services and
their associated effect on day rates, rig utilization and planned capital expenditures, excess
availability of land drilling rigs, including as a result of the reactivation or construction of
new land drilling rigs, adverse industry conditions, adverse credit and equity market conditions,
difficulty in integrating acquisitions, demand for oil and natural gas, shortages of rig equipment
and ability to retain management and field personnel. Refer to Risk Factors contained in Part 1
of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2008 for a more complete
discussion of these and other factors that might affect our performance and financial results.
These forward-looking statements are intended to relay our expectations about the future, and speak
only as of the date they are made. We undertake no obligation to publicly update or revise any
forward-looking statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise.
You are cautioned not to place undue reliance on any of our forward-looking statements, which
speak only as of the date such forward looking statement was made.
22
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
ITEM 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
The table below sets forth the information with respect to purchases of our common stock made
by us during the quarter ended June 30, 2009.
Approximate Dollar | ||||||||||||||||
Total Number of | Value of Shares | |||||||||||||||
Shares (or Units) | That May yet be | |||||||||||||||
Purchased as Part | Purchased Under the | |||||||||||||||
Total | Average Price | of Publicly | Plans or | |||||||||||||
Number of Shares | Paid per | Announced Plans | Programs (in | |||||||||||||
Period Covered | Purchased | Share | or Programs | thousands)(1) | ||||||||||||
April 1-30, 2009 |
| $ | | | $ | 113,326 | ||||||||||
May 1-31, 2009 |
| $ | | | $ | 113,326 | ||||||||||
June 1-30, 2009 (2) |
70,439 | $ | 13.66 | 3,324 | $ | 113,280 | ||||||||||
Total |
70,439 | $ | 13.66 | 3,324 | $ | 113,280 | ||||||||||
(1) | On August 2, 2007, we announced that our Board of Directors approved a stock buyback program authorizing purchases of up to $250 million of our common stock in open market or privately negotiated transactions. | |
(2) | We purchased 67,115 shares from employees to provide the respective employees with the funds necessary to satisfy their tax withholding obligations with respect to the vesting of restricted shares. The price paid was the closing price of our common stock on the last business day prior to the date the shares vested. These purchases were made pursuant to the terms of the Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc. 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan and not pursuant to the stock buyback program. |
ITEM 4. Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
On June 3, 2009, the Company held its Annual Meeting of Stockholders. At the meeting, the
stockholders voted on the following matters:
1. | The election of seven persons to serve as directors of the Company. | ||
2. | Ratification of the appointment of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the independent registered public accounting firm of the Company for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2009. |
The seven nominees for election to the Board of Directors of the Company were elected at the
meeting, and the other proposal received the affirmative votes required for approval. The voting
results were as follows:
1. | Election of Directors | Votes For | Votes Withheld | |||
Mark S. Siegel | 128,155,761 | 4,666,853 | ||||
Kenneth N. Berns | 128,148,585 | 4,674,029 | ||||
Charles O. Buckner | 119,527,156 | 13,295,458 | ||||
Curtis W. Huff | 119,300,512 | 13,522,102 | ||||
Terry H. Hunt | 125,492,385 | 7,330,228 | ||||
Kenneth R. Peak | 119,312,590 | 13,510,024 | ||||
Cloyce A. Talbott | 124,580,927 | 8,241,687 |
Votes | Broker | |||||||||
Votes For | Against | Abstentions | Non-votes | |||||||
2. |
Ratification of PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP as the Companys independent registered public accounting firm | 131,162,270 | 1,610,301 | 50,042 | 0 |
ITEM
5. Other Information
Effective
as of August 10, 2009, the Companys General Counsel and Secretary has resigned
from those positions.
23
Table of Contents
ITEM 6. Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed herewith or incorporated by reference, as indicated:
3.1
|
Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (filed August 9, 2004 as Exhibit 3.1 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference). | |
3.2
|
Amendment to Restated Certificate of Incorporation, as amended (filed August 9, 2004 as Exhibit 3.2 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2004 and incorporated herein by reference). | |
3.3
|
Second Amended and Restated Bylaws (filed August 6, 2007 as Exhibit 3.3 to the Companys Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarterly period ended June 30, 2007 and incorporated herein by reference). | |
10.1
|
Credit Agreement dated March 20, 2009, among the Company, as borrower, Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, letter of credit issuer, swing line lender and lender, each of Amegy Bank, N.A., Comerica Bank, and HSBC Bank USA, N.A., as lender, Bank of America, N.A., as syndication agent, letter of credit issuer and lender, and The Bank of Tokyo-Mitsubishi UFJ, Ltd. As documentation agent and lender (filed March 25, 2009 as Exhibit 10.1 to the Companys Current Report on Form 8-K and incorporated herein by reference). | |
10.2*
|
Commitment Increase and Joinder Agreement dated June 19, 2009, among the Company, as borrower, Regions Bank as the new lender, Bank of America, N.A., as a letter of credit issuer and Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., as administrative agent, letter of credit issuer, swing line lender and lender. | |
31.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
31.2*
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Rule 13a-14(a)/15d-14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. | |
32.1*
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 USC Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | |
101*
|
The following materials from Patterson-UTI Energy, Inc.s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2009, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders Equity, (iv) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (v) Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of text. |
* | filed herewith |
24
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly
caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
PATTERSON-UTI ENERGY, INC. |
||||
By: | /s/ Gregory W. Pipkin | |||
Gregory W. Pipkin | ||||
(Principal Accounting Officer and Duly Authorized Officer) Chief Accounting Officer and Assistant Secretary | ||||
DATED: August 4, 2009
25