PC TEL INC - Quarter Report: 2010 March (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
Form 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended March 31, 2010
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number 000-27115
PCTEL, Inc.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware | 77-0364943 | |
(State or Other Jurisdiction of | (I.R.S. Employer | |
Incorporation or Organization) | Identification Number) | |
471 Brighton Drive, | ||
Bloomingdale, IL | 60108 | |
(Address of Principal Executive Office) | (Zip Code) |
(630) 372-6800
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
(Registrants Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Date File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months
(or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated
filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definition of accelerated
filer large accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act:
o Large accelerated filer | þ Accelerated filer | o Non-accelerated filer (do not check if a smaller reporting company) | o Smaller reporting company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrants classes of common stock,
as of the latest practicable date.
Title | Outstanding | |
Common Stock, par value $.001 per share
|
19,078,829 as of May 1, 2010 |
PCTEL, INC.
Form 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
Form 10-Q
For the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2010
TABLE OF CONTENTS
2
Table of Contents
PART I FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1: Financial Statements
PCTEL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
(in thousands, except share data)
(in thousands, except share data)
(unaudited) | ||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
ASSETS |
||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ | 31,129 | $ | 35,543 | ||||
Short-term investment securities |
28,934 | 27,896 | ||||||
Accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts
of $99 and $89 at March 31, 2010 and
December 31, 2009, respectively |
12,819 | 9,756 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
8,343 | 8,107 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets, net |
1,024 | 1,024 | ||||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
2,837 | 2,541 | ||||||
Total current assets |
85,086 | 84,867 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
11,678 | 12,093 | ||||||
Long-term investment securities |
12,406 | 12,135 | ||||||
Other intangible assets, net |
12,120 | 9,241 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets, net |
8,704 | 9,947 | ||||||
Other noncurrent assets |
981 | 935 | ||||||
TOTAL ASSETS |
$ | 130,975 | $ | 129,218 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
||||||||
Accounts payable |
$ | 1,999 | $ | 2,192 | ||||
Accrued liabilities |
6,025 | 3,786 | ||||||
Total current liabilities |
8,024 | 5,978 | ||||||
Long-term liabilities |
2,270 | 2,172 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
10,294 | 8,150 | ||||||
Stockholders equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $0.001 par value, 100,000,000 shares
authorized, 19,092,062 and 18,494,499 shares issued and
outstanding at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively |
19 | 18 | ||||||
Additional paid-in capital |
138,559 | 138,141 | ||||||
Accumulated deficit |
(17,917 | ) | (17,122 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income |
20 | 31 | ||||||
Total stockholders equity |
120,681 | 121,068 | ||||||
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS EQUITY |
$ | 130,975 | $ | 129,218 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
PCTEL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (unaudited)
(in thousands, except per share data)
(in thousands, except per share data)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
REVENUES |
$ | 15,573 | $ | 14,139 | ||||
COST OF REVENUES |
8,354 | 7,468 | ||||||
GROSS PROFIT |
7,219 | 6,671 | ||||||
OPERATING EXPENSES: |
||||||||
Research and development |
3,085 | 2,688 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
2,259 | 2,083 | ||||||
General and administrative |
2,552 | 2,533 | ||||||
Amortization of other intangible assets |
763 | 553 | ||||||
Restructuring charges |
| 154 | ||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
| 1,485 | ||||||
Royalties |
| (200 | ) | |||||
Total operating expenses |
8,659 | 9,296 | ||||||
OPERATING LOSS |
(1,440 | ) | (2,625 | ) | ||||
Other income, net |
159 | 165 | ||||||
LOSS BEFORE INCOME TAXES |
(1,281 | ) | (2,460 | ) | ||||
Benefit for income taxes |
(486 | ) | (596 | ) | ||||
NET LOSS |
($795 | ) | ($1,864 | ) | ||||
Basic Earnings per Share: |
||||||||
Net Loss |
($0.05 | ) | ($0.11 | ) | ||||
Diluted Earnings per Share: |
||||||||
Net Loss |
($0.05 | ) | ($0.11 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares Basic |
17,487 | 17,545 | ||||||
Weighted average shares Diluted |
17,487 | 17,545 |
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
4
Table of Contents
PCTEL, INC.
CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(unaudited, in thousands)
(unaudited, in thousands)
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Operating Activities: |
||||||||
Net loss |
($795 | ) | ($1,864 | ) | ||||
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash (used in) provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation and amortization |
1,332 | 1,102 | ||||||
Impairment charge |
| 1,485 | ||||||
Gain on bargain purchase of acquisition |
(54 | ) | | |||||
Amortization of stock based compensation |
952 | 818 | ||||||
Gain from short-term investments |
| (55 | ) | |||||
Gain on sale of assets and related royalties |
| (200 | ) | |||||
Loss on disposal/sale of property and equipment |
7 | 12 | ||||||
Restructuring costs |
| (36 | ) | |||||
Payment of withholding tax on stock based compensation |
(664 | ) | (734 | ) | ||||
Deferred tax assets |
(52 | ) | | |||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities, net of acquisitions: |
||||||||
Accounts receivable |
(2,895 | ) | 4,400 | |||||
Inventories |
(31 | ) | 30 | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
(339 | ) | (167 | ) | ||||
Accounts payable |
(520 | ) | (1,476 | ) | ||||
Income taxes payable |
(105 | ) | (233 | ) | ||||
Other accrued liabilities |
1,366 | (1,710 | ) | |||||
Deferred revenue |
735 | (23 | ) | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(1,063 | ) | 1,349 | |||||
Investing Activities: |
||||||||
Capital expenditures |
(152 | ) | (148 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from disposal of property and equipment |
3 | | ||||||
Purchase of investments |
(9,744 | ) | (10,634 | ) | ||||
Redemptions/maturities of short-term investments |
8,435 | 2,454 | ||||||
Proceeds on sale of assets and related royalties |
| 200 | ||||||
Purchase of assets/businesses, net of cash acquired |
(2,109 | ) | (2,260 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,567 | ) | (10,388 | ) | ||||
Financing Activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from issuance of common stock |
225 | 201 | ||||||
Payments for repurchase of common stock |
| (85 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
225 | 116 | ||||||
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents |
(4,405 | ) | (8,923 | ) | ||||
Effect of exchange rate changes on cash |
(9 | ) | 48 | |||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
35,543 | 44,766 | ||||||
Cash and Cash Equivalents, End of Period |
$ | 31,129 | $ | 35,891 | ||||
The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
PCTEL, INC.
NOTES TO THE CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 (Unaudited)
(in thousands)
1. Basis of Presentation
The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in
accordance with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles for interim financial information and
with the instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X. Accordingly, they do not
include all of the information and footnotes required by U.S. generally accepted accounting
principles for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments
(consisting of normal recurring accruals) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been
included. For further information, refer to the audited consolidated financial statements and
footnotes thereto included in the companys Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December
31, 2009.
Nature of Operations
PCTEL focuses on wireless broadband technology related to propagation and optimization. The
company designs and develops innovative antennas that extend the reach of broadband and other
wireless networks that simplify the implementation of those networks. The company provides highly
specialized software-defined radios that facilitate the design and optimization of broadband
wireless networks. The company supplies its products to public and private carriers, wireless
infrastructure providers, wireless equipment distributors, value added resellers (VARs) and other
original equipment manufacturers (OEMs).
On January 12, 2010, the company acquired Sparco Technologies, Inc. (Sparco), a San Antonio,
Texas based company that specializes in selling value-added Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN)
products and services to the enterprise, education, hospitality, and healthcare markets. Sparcos
product line includes antennas for WLAN, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA)
enclosures and mounting accessories, site survey tools, and amplifiers. With this acquisition, the
company extended its product offering, channel penetration and technology base in wireless
enterprise products. The company is integrating the Sparco operations into its antenna products
group.
On December 30, 2009, the company acquired all of the assets related to the scanning receiver
business from Ascom. This business was a small part of Comarcos Wireless Test Solutions (WTS)
segment, a business that Ascom acquired in 2009. Under the agreement, the company will continue to
supply both its scanning receivers and the WTS scanning receivers to the newly formed Ascom that
consolidated the testing businesses for mobile telecom carriers of Ascom. The company accounted
for this purchase of assets as a business combination.
On December 9, 2009, the company acquired from Wider Networks, Inc. (Wider) its interference
management patents as well as the exclusive distribution rights for Widers interference management
products as part of a settlement agreement. The settlement agreement provided for a purchase of
assets in the form of patented technology, trade names and trademarks, and exclusive distribution
rights. The settlement gives the company another interference management product, suitable for
certain markets, to distribute alongside its CLARIFY® product.
On January 5, 2009, the company acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Wi-Sys
Communications, Inc. (Wi-Sys). During the second quarter 2009, the company exited the Canadian
facility of Wi-Sys and fully integrated the Wi-Sys product lines into the companys antenna product
operations in Bloomingdale, Illinois. During 2009, the company incurred a restructuring charge of
$0.2 million for employee severance, lease termination costs, and disposition of assets related to
the Wi-Sys integration.
Basis of Consolidation and Foreign Currency Translation
The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of March 31, 2010 and the condensed consolidated
statements of operations and cash flows for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 are
unaudited and reflect all adjustments of a normal recurring nature that are, in the opinion of
management, necessary for a fair presentation of the interim period financial statements. The
interim condensed consolidated financial statements are derived from the audited financial
statements as of December 31, 2009.
The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the company and its
subsidiaries. All intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The unaudited
interim condensed consolidated financial statements of the company have been prepared pursuant to
the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Accordingly, certain
information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the U.S. have been condensed or
omitted. The significant accounting policies followed by the company are set forth within the
companys Annual Report
6
Table of Contents
on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009 (the 2009 Form 10-K). There were no changes in
the companys significant accounting policies during the three months ended March 31, 2010. In
addition, the company reaffirms the use of estimates in the preparation of the financial statements
as set forth in the 2009 Form 10-K. These interim condensed consolidated financial statements
should be read in conjunction with the companys audited consolidated financial statements and
notes thereto included in the 2009 Form 10-K. The results for the operations for the period ended
March 31, 2010 may not be indicative of the results for the period ended December 31, 2010.
The company is exposed to foreign currency fluctuations due to our foreign operations and
international sales. The functional currency for the companys foreign operations is predominantly
the applicable local currency. Accounts of foreign operations are translated into U.S. dollars
using the exchange rate in effect at the applicable balance sheet date for assets and liabilities
and average monthly rates prevailing during the period for revenue and expense accounts.
Adjustments resulting from translation are included in accumulated other comprehensive income, a
separate component of shareholders equity. Gains and losses resulting from other transactions
originally in foreign currencies and then translated into U.S. dollars are included in net loss.
Net foreign exchange losses resulting from foreign currency transactions included in other income,
net were $14 and $30 for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Fair Value of Financial Instruments
Cash and cash equivalents are measured at fair value and short-term investments are recognized at
amortized cost in the companys financial statements. Accounts receivable and other investments
are financial assets with carrying values that approximate fair value due to the short-term nature
of these assets. Accounts payable and other accrued expenses are financial liabilities with
carrying values that approximate fair value due to the short-term nature of these liabilities. The
company follows fair value accounting which establishes a fair value hierarchy that requires the
company to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when
measuring fair value. A financial instruments categorization within the hierarchy is based on the
lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
There are three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1: inputs are unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities.
Level 2: inputs other than Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly, such as
quoted prices in active markets for similar assets and liabilities, quoted prices for identical or
similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or other inputs that are observable
or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of assets or
liabilities.
Level 3: unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are
significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities.
2. Recent Accounting Pronouncements
Recently Adopted Accounting Guidance
In January 2010, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued guidance to amend the
disclosure requirements related to recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The guidance
requires new disclosures on the transfers of assets and liabilities between Level 1 (quoted prices
in active market for identical assets or liabilities) and Level 2 (significant other observable
inputs) of the fair value measurement hierarchy, including the reasons and the timing of the
transfers. Additionally, the guidance requires a roll forward of activities on purchases, sales,
issuance, and settlements of the assets and liabilities measured using significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3 fair value measurements). The guidance became effective for the company with the
reporting period beginning January 1, 2010, except for the disclosure on the roll forward
activities for Level 3 fair value measurements, which will become effective for the company with
the reporting period beginning July 1, 2011. Adoption of this new guidance did not have a material
impact on the companys consolidated financial statements.
In June 2009, the FASB issued amendments to the accounting rules for Variable Interest Entities
(VIEs) and for transfers of financial assets. The new guidance for VIEs eliminates the
quantitative approach previously required for determining the primary beneficiary of a variable
interest entity and requires ongoing qualitative reassessments of whether an enterprise is the
primary beneficiary. In addition, qualifying special purpose entities (QSPEs) are no longer
exempt from consolidation under the amended guidance. The amendments also limit the circumstances
in which a financial asset, or a portion of a financial asset, should be derecognized when the
transferor has not transferred the entire original financial asset to an entity that is not
consolidated with the transferor in the financial statements being presented, and/or when the
transferor has continuing involvement with the transferred financial asset. The company adopted
these amendments for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on January 1, 2010. The
adoption of these amendments did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial
statements.
7
Table of Contents
Recent Accounting Guidance Not Yet Adopted
In October 2009, the FASB issued changes to revenue recognition for multiple-deliverable
arrangements. These changes require separation of consideration received in such arrangements by
establishing a selling price hierarchy (not the same as fair value) for determining the selling
price of a deliverable, which will be based on available information in the following order:
vendor-specific objective evidence, third-party evidence, or estimated selling price; eliminate the
residual method of allocation and require that the consideration be allocated at the inception of
the arrangement to all deliverables using the relative selling price method, which allocates any
discount in the arrangement to each deliverable on the basis of each deliverables selling price;
require that a vendor determine its best estimate of selling price in a manner that is consistent
with that used to determine the price to sell the deliverable on a standalone basis; and expand the
disclosures related to multiple-deliverable revenue arrangements. The company will adopt these
changes on the effective date of January 1, 2011. The company does not expect the adoption of
these changes to have a material impact on its consolidated financial statements.
3. Balance Sheet Data
Cash and Cash equivalents
At March 31, 2010, cash and cash equivalents included bank balances and investments with
original maturities less than 90 days. At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the companys cash
equivalents were invested in highly liquid AAA money market funds that are required to comply with
Rule 2a-7 of the Investment Company Act of 1940. Such funds utilize the amortized cost method of
accounting, seek to maintain a constant $1.00 per share price, and are redeemable upon demand. The
company restricts its investments in AAA money market funds to those invested 100% in either short
term U.S. Government Agency securities, or bank repurchase agreements collateralized by the these
same securities. The fair values of these money market funds are established through quoted prices
in active markets for identical assets (Level 1 inputs). The cash in the companys U.S. banks is
fully insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation due to the balances being below the
maximum insured amounts.
The company had $0.7 million and $0.9 million of cash equivalents in foreign bank accounts at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. As of March 31, 2010, the company has no intentions
of repatriating the cash in its foreign bank accounts. If the company decides to repatriate the
cash in the foreign bank accounts, it may experience difficulty in repatriating this cash in a
timely manner. The company may also be exposed to foreign currency fluctuations and taxes if it
repatriates these funds.
Investments
At March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, the companys short-term and long-term investments
consisted of pre-refunded municipal bonds, U.S. Government Agency bonds, and AA or higher rated
corporate bonds all classified as held-to-maturity
At March 31, 2010, the company has invested $37.7 million in pre-refunded municipal bonds and U.S.
Government Agency bonds and $3.6 million in AA or higher rated corporate bonds. The income and
principal from the pre-refunded municipal bonds are secured by an irrevocable trust of U.S Treasury
securities. The bonds, classified as short-term investments, have original maturities greater than
90 days and mature in less than one year. The company classified $12.4 million as long-term
investment securities because the original maturities were greater than one year. Of this total,
$7.8 million mature in 2011, and $4.6 million mature in 2012. The companys bonds are recorded at
the purchase price and carried at amortized cost. Approximately 13% of the companys bonds were
protected by bond default insurance at March 31, 2010.
At December 31, 2009, the company had $35.1 million invested in pre-refunded municipal bonds and
U.S. Government Agency bonds and $4.9 million in AA or higher rated corporate bonds, and classified
$12.1 million as long-term investment securities because the original maturities were greater than
one year.
The companys financial assets are measured for fair value on a recurring basis. At March 31,
2010, all of the companys financial assets were able to be measured with Level 1 inputs.
8
Table of Contents
The fair value measurements of the financial assets at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as
follows:
Quoted at Prices in Active Markets | ||||||||
for Identical Assets (Level 1) | ||||||||
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash equivalents |
$ | 30,371 | $ | 34,933 | ||||
Bonds: |
||||||||
Short-term |
28,996 | 28,330 | ||||||
Long-term |
12,458 | 11,878 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 71,825 | $ | 75,141 | ||||
The fair value amounts above are based on based on prices in active markets for identical
assets (Level 1 inputs). The fair values of the financial assets in the table above are not equal
to the book values of these financial assets. The net unrealized gains were approximately $0.1
million and $0.2 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
Accounts Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
Accounts receivable are recorded at invoiced amount with standard net terms that range between
30 and 60 days. The company extends credit to its customers based on an evaluation of a companys
financial condition and collateral is generally not required. The company maintains an allowance
for doubtful accounts for estimated uncollectible accounts receivable. The allowance is based on
the companys assessment of known delinquent accounts, historical experience, and other currently
available evidence of the collectability and the aging of accounts receivable. The companys
allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.1 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. The provision for doubtful accounts is included in sales and marketing expense in
the condensed consolidated statements of operations. There were no unbilled receivables at March
31, 2010 or December 31, 2009.
Inventories
Inventories are stated at the lower of cost or market and include material, labor and overhead
costs using the FIFO method of costing. Inventories as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009
were composed of raw materials, sub-assemblies, finished goods and work-in-process. Any costs from
under utilization of capacity and fixed production costs are expensed in the period incurred. The
company had consigned inventory with customers of $0.8 million and $0.6 million at March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively. The company records allowances to reduce the value of
inventory to the lower of cost or market, including allowances for excess and obsolete inventory.
The allowance for inventory losses was $1.2 million at both March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009.
Inventories consisted of the following at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Raw materials |
$ | 5,621 | $ | 5,836 | ||||
Work in process |
467 | 390 | ||||||
Finished goods |
2,255 | 1,881 | ||||||
Inventories, net |
$ | 8,343 | $ | 8,107 | ||||
Prepaid and other current assets
Prepaid assets are stated at cost and are amortized over the useful lives (up to one year) of
the assets.
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and are depreciated using the straight-line method
over the estimated useful lives of the assets. The company depreciates computers over three years,
office equipment, manufacturing equipment, and vehicles over five years, furniture and
9
Table of Contents
fixtures over seven years, and buildings over 30 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized over the
shorter of the corresponding lease term or useful life. Gains and losses on the disposal of
property and equipment are included in operating expenses in the condensed consolidated statements
of operations. Maintenance and repairs are expensed as incurred.
Property and equipment consists of the following at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Building |
$ | 6,207 | $ | 6,207 | ||||
Computers and office equipment |
4,114 | 4,013 | ||||||
Manufacturing and test equipment |
7,330 | 7,300 | ||||||
Furniture and fixtures |
1,106 | 1,104 | ||||||
Leasehold improvements |
171 | 166 | ||||||
Motor vehicles |
28 | 27 | ||||||
Total property and equipment |
18,956 | 18,817 | ||||||
Less: Accumulated depreciation and amortization |
(9,048 | ) | (8,494 | ) | ||||
Land |
1,770 | 1,770 | ||||||
Property and equipment, net |
$ | 11,678 | $ | 12,093 | ||||
Goodwill
The companys goodwill balance was $0 on the condensed consolidated balance sheets at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. In January 2009, the company recorded goodwill of
$1.1 million related to the acquisition of Wi-Sys. In March 2009, the company recorded goodwill
impairment of $1.5 million because of the companys low market capitalization. The impairment
represented the full amount of the goodwill from the Wi-Sys acquisition and $0.4 million remaining
from the companys Licensing unit.
The company tests goodwill for impairment on an annual basis or at an interim date if an event
occurs or if circumstances change that would more likely than not reduce the fair value of a
segment below its carrying value. The company performs the annual impairment test of goodwill at
the end of the first month of the fiscal fourth quarter (October 31st). At March 31,
2009, the company tested its goodwill for impairment due to the companys market capitalization
being below its carrying value. The company considered this market capitalization deficit as a
triggering event for purposes of analyzing goodwill for impairment.
Intangible Assets
The company amortizes intangible assets with finite lives on a straight-line basis over the
estimated useful lives, which range from one to eight years. The summary of other intangible
assets, net as of March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009 are as follows:
March 31, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Accumulated | Net Book | Accumulated | Net Book | |||||||||||||||||||||
Cost | Amortization | Value | Cost | Amortization | Value | |||||||||||||||||||
Customer relationships |
$ | 17,776 | $ | 7,196 | $ | 10,580 | $ | 14,426 | $ | 6,621 | $ | 7,805 | ||||||||||||
Patents and technology |
6,409 | 5,787 | 622 | 6,409 | 5,718 | 691 | ||||||||||||||||||
Trademarks and trade names |
2,629 | 1,826 | 803 | 2,361 | 1,746 | 615 | ||||||||||||||||||
Other, net |
1,661 | 1,546 | 115 | 1,638 | 1,508 | 130 | ||||||||||||||||||
$ | 28,475 | $ | 16,355 | $ | 12,120 | $ | 24,834 | $ | 15,593 | $ | 9,241 | |||||||||||||
The $2.9 million increase in intangible assets at March 31, 2010 compared to December 31, 2009
reflects the addition of approximately $3.6 million for the acquisition of Sparco in January 2010
minus amortization of approximately $0.8 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010. See
Note 4 for information related to the Sparco acquisition.
10
Table of Contents
Liabilities
Accrued liabilities consist of the following at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Inventory receipts |
$ | 2,003 | $ | 1,135 | ||||
Paid time off |
864 | 777 | ||||||
Deferred revenues |
744 | 9 | ||||||
Payroll, bonuses, and other employee benefits |
653 | 415 | ||||||
Professional fees |
255 | 199 | ||||||
Warranties |
213 | 228 | ||||||
Due to Sparco shareholders |
202 | | ||||||
Due to Wider |
196 | 194 | ||||||
Due to Ascom |
98 | 97 | ||||||
Employee stock purchase plan |
89 | 207 | ||||||
Other |
708 | 525 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 6,025 | $ | 3,786 | ||||
Long-term liabilities consist of the following:
March 31, | December 31, | |||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Executive deferred compensation plan |
$ | 996 | $ | 928 | ||||
Income taxes |
798 | 798 | ||||||
Due to Wider |
192 | 189 | ||||||
Deferred rent |
147 | 163 | ||||||
Due to Ascom |
95 | 94 | ||||||
Deferred revenues |
42 | | ||||||
$ | 2,270 | $ | 2,172 | |||||
4. Acquisitions
Acquisition of Sparco Technologies, Inc.
On January 12, 2010, the company acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Sparco pursuant
to a Share Purchase Agreement among PCTEL, Sparco, and David R. Dulling, Valerie Dulling, Chris
Cooke, and Glenn Buckner, the holders of the outstanding share capital of Sparco. Sparco is a San
Antonio, Texas based company that specializes in selling value-added WLAN products and services to
the Enterprise, Education, Hospitality, and Healthcare markets. Sparcos product line includes
antennas for WLAN, NEMA enclosures and mounting accessories, site survey tools, and amplifiers. With this acquisition, the company
extended its product offering, channel penetration and technology base in wireless enterprise
products. The company is integrating Sparcos operations into the companys antenna products
group. Sparco has one location in San Antonio, Texas and leases a single facility with a term
through September 2010. Sparco revenues were approximately $2.8 million for the year ended
December 31, 2009. The revenues and expenses of Sparco are included in the companys financial
results in the three months ended March 31, 2010 from the date of acquisition. The pro-forma
affect on the financial results of the company as if the acquisition had taken place on January 1,
2009 is not significant.
The consideration for Sparco was $2.5 million, consisting of $2.4 million in cash consideration and
$0.1 million related to the companys outstanding receivable balance from Sparco at the date of
acquisition. Of the $2.4 million cash consideration, $2.1 million was payable to the Sparco
shareholders and $0.3 million was used to discharge outstanding debt liabilities At March 31,
2010, approximately $0.2 million was due to the former Sparco shareholders, consisting of the final
payment due related to the purchase price and an amount owed related to the opening cash balance.
The $0.2 million due to the former Sparco shareholders is included in accrued liabilities at March
31, 2010. The cash consideration paid in connection with the acquisition was provided from the
companys existing cash. The acquisition related costs for the Sparco purchase were not
significant to the companys consolidated financial statements.
11
Table of Contents
The consideration was allocated based on fair value: $1.1 million to net tangible liabilities, $3.3
million to customer relationships, $0.3 million to trade names and other intangible assets. The
fair value of the net assets acquired exceeded the total investment by $54. This $54 gain on the
bargain purchase of Sparco was recorded in other income, net in the condensed consolidated
statements of operations. There was no goodwill recorded with this transaction. The consideration
was determined based on the fair value of the intangible assets modeled at the time of the
negotiation, which were updated at the time of closing. An immaterial bargain purchase amount
resulted. The consideration was determined based on the fair value of the intangible assets
modeled at the time of the negotiation. An immaterial bargain purchase amount resulted from the
process of validating the companys initial fair value model assumptions with actual performance
information from the first quarter of operations. The intangible assets will be amortized for book
purposes, but are not tax deductible. The weighted average amortization period of the intangible
assets acquired is 6.0 years. The company estimated the fair value (and remaining useful lives) of
the assets and liabilities.
The following is the allocation of the purchase price for Sparco:
Current assets: |
||||
Cash |
$ | 91 | ||
Accounts receivable |
269 | |||
Prepaids and other assets |
5 | |||
Inventories |
205 | |||
Fixed assets |
10 | |||
Deferred tax assets |
53 | |||
Total current assets |
633 | |||
Intangible assets: |
||||
Customer relationships |
3,350 | |||
Trade name |
268 | |||
Backlog |
12 | |||
Non-compete |
11 | |||
Total intangible assets |
3,641 | |||
Total assets |
4,274 | |||
Current liabilities: |
||||
Accounts payable |
326 | |||
Accrued liabilities |
46 | |||
Total current liabilities |
372 | |||
Long term liabilities: |
||||
Deferred tax liabilities |
1,347 | |||
Total long term liabilities |
1,347 | |||
Total liabilities |
1,719 | |||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 2,555 | ||
Purchase of assets from Ascom Network Testing, Inc.
On December 30, 2009, the company entered into and closed an Asset Purchase Agreement (the Ascom
APA) with Ascom. Under the terms of the Ascom APA, the company acquired all of the assets related
to Ascoms scanning receiver business (WTS scanning receivers). The WTS scanning receiver
business was a small part of Comarcos WTS segment, a business that Ascom acquired in 2009. The
WTS scanning receiver business is being integrated with the companys scanning receiver operations
in Germantown, Maryland. The WTS scanning receivers augment the companys scanning receiver
product line.
The parties also concurrently entered into a Transition Services Agreement (TSA). The TSA
provides for Ascom to manufacture and assemble the scanner receiver products until the Ascom
operations are integrated with the companys own operations in its Germantown, Maryland facility.
Per the Ascom APA, the company will fund the development of compatibility between its scanning
receivers and Ascoms
12
Table of Contents
benchmarking solution. The TSA period is from the date of the acquisition
for a period of up to six months. WTS scanning receiver revenues for the year ended December 31,
2009 were approximately $1.4 million. The pro-forma affect on the financial results of the company
as if the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2009 is not significant.
The total cash consideration for the scanning receiver assets was $4.3 million paid at the close of
the transaction and $0.2 million payable in two equal installments in December 2010 and December
2011. The cash consideration paid in connection with the acquisition was provided from the
companys existing cash. The $0.1 million fair value of the installment payment due in December
2010 is included in accrued liabilities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively and
the $0.1 million fair value of the payment due in December 2011 is included in long-term
liabilities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The payments of $0.2 million
are based upon achievement of certain revenue objectives. The company included the future payments
due in the purchase price because it believes that the achievement of these objectives is more
likely than not. The acquisition related costs for the Ascom purchase were not significant to the
companys consolidated financial statements.
The purchase price of $4.5 million for the scanning receiver assets of Ascom was allocated based on
fair value: $0.3 million to net tangible assets, $3.8 million to customer relationships, $0.3
million to core technology and trade names, and $0.1 million to other intangible assets. The
technology includes $0.2 million of in-process R&D related to LTE scanner development. The
projects related to the in-process research and development are expected to be complete in the
third quarter of 2010. The tangible assets include inventory and warranty obligations. There was
no goodwill recorded from this acquisition. The intangible assets are being amortized for book
purposes and are tax deductible. The weighted average book amortization period of the intangible
assets acquired is 5.7 years. The company estimated the fair value (and remaining useful lives) of
the assets and liabilities.
The following is the allocation of the purchase price for Ascom:
Current assets: |
||||
Inventory |
$ | 248 | ||
Intangible assets: |
||||
Core technology |
254 | |||
Customer relationships |
3,833 | |||
Trade name |
52 | |||
Other, net |
130 | |||
Total intangible assets |
4,269 | |||
Total assets |
4,517 | |||
Current liabilities: |
||||
Warranty accrual |
26 | |||
Total current liabilities |
26 | |||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 4,491 | ||
Separately, the companies renewed their existing supply agreement through December 30, 2014, which
remained non-exclusive. Under the agreement, the company will continue to supply both the PCTEL
scanning receivers and the WTS scanning receivers to the newly formed Ascom Network Testing
Division that consolidated the testing businesses for mobile telecom carriers of Ascom.
Acquisition of Wi-Sys Communications, Inc.
On January 5, 2009, the company acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Wi-Sys pursuant to
a Share Purchase Agreement dated January 5, 2009 among PCTEL, Gyles Panther and Linda Panther, the
holders of the outstanding share capital of Wi-Sys. The total consideration for Wi-Sys was $2.1
million paid at the close of the transaction and $0.2 million additional due to the shareholders
based on the final balance sheet at December 31, 2008. The $0.2 million additional consideration
was paid in cash in July 2009. The cash consideration paid in connection with the acquisition was
provided from the companys existing cash. The company incurred acquisition costs of approximately
$0.1 million related to Wi-Sys. The pro-forma affect on the financial results of the company as if
the acquisition had taken place on January 1, 2009 is not significant.
13
Table of Contents
Wi-Sys manufactured products for GPS, terrestrial and satellite communication systems, including
programmable GPS receivers and high performance antennas in Ottawa, Canada. The Wi-Sys antenna
product line augments the companys GPS antenna product line. Wi-Sys revenues for the year ended
December 31, 2008 were approximately $2.2 million. The revenues and expenses for Wi-Sys are
included in the companys financial results for the year ended December 31, 2009.
The purchase price of $2.3 million for the assets of Wi-Sys was allocated based on fair value: $0.8
million to tangible assets and $0.4 million to liabilities assumed, $0.7 million to customer
relationships, and $0.1 million to core technology and trade names. The $1.1 million excess of the
purchase price over the fair value of the net tangible and intangible assets was allocated to
goodwill. The goodwill was impaired for book purposes in the first quarter 2009. The goodwill is
deductible for tax purposes. The intangible assets will be amortized for book and are tax
deductible. The weighted average book amortization period of the intangible assets acquired is 5.5
years. The company estimated the fair value (and remaining useful lives) of the assets and
liabilities.
The following is the allocation of the purchase price for Wi-sys:
Current assets: |
||||
Cash |
$ | 59 | ||
Accounts receivable |
319 | |||
Inventory |
294 | |||
Prepaid expenses and other assets |
90 | |||
Total current assets |
762 | |||
Fixed assets, net |
69 | |||
Intangible assets: |
||||
Core technology |
37 | |||
Customer relationships |
730 | |||
Trade name |
18 | |||
Goodwill |
1,101 | |||
Total intangible assets |
1,886 | |||
Total assets |
2,717 | |||
Current liabilities: |
||||
Accounts payable |
139 | |||
Accrued liabilities |
36 | |||
Total current liabilities |
175 | |||
Deferred tax liabilities |
223 | |||
Total liabilities |
398 | |||
Net assets acquired |
$ | 2,319 | ||
In March 2009, the company recorded goodwill impairment of $1.5 million. The impairment charge
included the $1.1 million recorded for the Wi-Sys acquisition. See the goodwill section in Note
3for further discussion of the goodwill impairment.
In the second quarter 2009, the company closed the Ottawa, Canada location and integrated the
operations in the companys Bloomingdale, Illinois location. None of the Wi-Sys employees were
retained by the company. The company incurred expenses related to employee severance, lease
termination, and other shut down costs associated with the Wi-Sys restructuring. See Note 10
related to Restructuring.
5. Settlement with Wider Networks LLC
On December 9, 2009, the company settled its intellectual property dispute with Wider. The
settlement agreement provided for a purchase of assets in the form of patented technology, trade
names and trademarks, and exclusive distribution rights. The settlement gives the company another
interference management product, suitable for certain markets, to distribute along side CLARIFY®.
The company paid cash consideration of $0.8 million at the close of the transaction and will pay an
additional $0.4 million in two equal installments in December 2010 and December 2011, respectively.
The $0.2 million fair value of the installment payment due in December 2010 is included in accrued
liabilities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and the $0.2 million fair value
of the payment due in December 2011 is
14
Table of Contents
included in long-term liabilities at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The fair value of the elements in the settlement agreement is
approximately $1.2 million. The $1.2 million fair value of the assets purchased from Wider was
allocated: $1.0 million to distribution rights and $0.2 million to core technology and trade names.
The intangible assets are being amortized for book purposes and are tax deductible. The weighted
average book amortization period of the intangible assets acquired is 5.7 years. The company
estimated the fair value (and remaining useful lives) of the assets.
The following is the fair value of the asset acquired from Wider:
Intangible assets: |
||||
Distribution rights, net |
$ | 1,013 | ||
Core technology |
127 | |||
Trade name |
31 | |||
Total intangible assets |
1,171 | |||
See also Note 11 for information on legal proceedings with Wider.
6. Dispositions
Sale of product lines to Sigma Wireless Technologies, Ltd.
On August 14, 2008, the company entered into an asset purchase agreement for the sale of certain
antenna products and related assets to Sigma Wireless Technologies, Ltd (SWTS). SWTS purchased
the intellectual property, dedicated inventory, and certain fixed assets related to four of the
companys antenna product families for $0.7 million, payable in installments at close and over a
period of 18 months.
SWTS was formed at the effective date of this sale to specifically house the operations of the
antenna lines and the sales activities related to the representation of the companys remaining
antenna products in Europe. SWTS was capitalized with equity of $0.1 million and the companys
promissory note of $0.6 million. The company concluded that SWTS is a VIE because of the companys
promissory note and because total equity investment of SWTS at risk is insufficient to finance the
activities of SWTS without additional subordinated financial support. Because the company is not
the primary beneficiary of SWTS, the company did not consolidate the results of SWTS in its
financial statements.
In 2009, the company reserved for the $0.4 million outstanding receivable balance from SWTS due to
uncertainty of collection. The reserve was recorded as a loss on sale of product lines and related
note receivable in the consolidated statements of operations. The related note was formally
written-off and cancelled on March 4, 2010. As of March 31, 2010, a sales representative
relationship constitutes the companys continuing involvement with SWTS. SWTS sells the companys
antennas to the same customer base that the company previously sold to and attempts to expand that
customer base on its own. SWTS also manufactures and sells the four antenna lines purchased from
the company.
15
Table of Contents
7. Earnings per Share
The following table sets forth the computation of basic and diluted earnings per share:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Basic Earnings Per Share computation: |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net loss |
($795 | ) | ($1,864 | ) | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
17,487 | 17,545 | ||||||
Basic loss per share |
($0.05 | ) | ($0.11 | ) | ||||
Diluted Earnings Per Share computation: |
||||||||
Numerator: |
||||||||
Net loss |
($795 | ) | ($1,864 | ) | ||||
Denominator: |
||||||||
Common shares outstanding |
17,487 | 17,545 | ||||||
Restricted shares subject to vesting |
* | * | ||||||
Common stock option grants |
* | * | ||||||
Diluted loss per share |
($0.05 | ) | ($0.11 | ) | ||||
* | As denoted by * in the table above, the weighted average common stock option grants and restricted shares of 469,000 and 126,000 were excluded from the calculations of diluted net loss per share for the periods ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, since their effects are anti-dilutive. |
8. Stock-Based Compensation
The condensed consolidated statements of operations include $1.0 million and $0.8 million of
stock compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Stock
compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 consists of $0.7 million of
restricted stock amortization, $0.1 million for performance share amortization, $0.1 million for
stock option expenses and stock purchase plan expenses, and $0.1 million for stock bonuses. Stock
compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2009 consists of $0.7 million of
restricted stock amortization and $0.1 million for stock option expenses, stock purchase plan
expenses and stock bonuses. The company did not capitalize any stock compensation expense during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 or 2009, respectively.
Total stock-based compensation is reflected in the condensed consolidated statements of operations
as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 91 | $ | 112 | ||||
Research and development |
149 | 139 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
209 | 137 | ||||||
General and administrative |
503 | 430 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 952 | $ | 818 | ||||
Restricted Stock Serviced Based
The company grants restricted shares as employee incentives as permitted under the companys 1997
Stock Plan, as amended and restated (1997 Stock Plan). In connection with the grant of
restricted stock to employees, the company records deferred stock compensation
16
Table of Contents
representing the fair value of the common stock on the date the restricted stock is granted. Stock compensation
expense is recorded ratably over the vesting period of the applicable shares. These grants vest
over various periods, but typically vest over four years.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, the company issued 684,650 shares of restricted stock
with grant date fair value of $4.2 million and recorded cancellations of 18,600 shares with grant
date fair value of $0.1 million. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the company issued
572,150 shares of restricted stock with grant date fair value of $2.4 million and recorded
cancellations of 18,100 shares with grant date fair value of $0.2 million.
For the three months ended March 31, 2010, 325,925 restricted shares vested with grant date fair
value of $2.1 million and intrinsic value of $1.9 million. For the three months ended March 31,
2009, 216,949 restricted shares vested with grant date fair value of $1.9 million and
intrinsic value of $1.5 million. At March 31, 2010, total unrecognized compensation expense
related to restricted stock was approximately $7.7 million, net of forfeitures to be recognized
through 2014 over a weighted average period of 2.1 years.
The following table summarizes restricted stock activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Unvested Restricted Stock Awards December 31, 2009 |
1,146,431 | $ | 6.14 | |||||
Shares awarded |
684,650 | 6.20 | ||||||
Shares vested |
(325,925 | ) | 5.74 | |||||
Shares cancelled |
(18,600 | ) | 5.40 | |||||
Unvested Restricted Stock Awards March 31, 2010 |
1,486,556 | $ | 6.09 |
Stock Options
The company may grant stock options to purchase the companys common stock. The company issues
stock options with exercise prices no less than the fair value of the companys stock on the grant
date. Employee options contain gradual vesting provisions, whereby 25% vest one year from the date
of grant and thereafter in monthly increments over the remaining three years. The Board of
Director options vest on the first anniversary of the grant year. Stock options may be exercised
at any time within ten years of the date of grant or within ninety days of termination of
employment, or such shorter time as may be provided in the related stock option agreement.
Presently, new employees and directors receive only service-based restricted awards for incentive
purposes. As such, the company expects that future stock option grants will be minimal.
The fair value of each unvested option was estimated on the date of grant using the Black-Scholes
option valuation model. The Black-Scholes option valuation model was developed for use in
estimating the fair value of traded options, which have no vesting restrictions and are fully
transferable. In addition, option valuation models require the input of highly subjective
assumptions including the expected stock price volatility and expected option life. Because the
companys employee stock options have characteristics significantly different from those of traded
options, and because changes in the subjective input assumptions can materially affect the fair
value estimate, the existing models may not necessarily provide a reliable single measure of the
fair value of the employee stock options.
The company did not issue any stock options and there were no stock option exercises during the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. During the three months ended March 31,
2010, 8,310 options were forfeited and 18,584 options expired. During the three months ended March
31, 2009, 1,610 options were forfeited and 6,907 options expired. As of March 31, 2010, the
unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of the companys stock options
was approximately $35, net of estimated forfeitures to be recognized through 2012 over a weighted
average period of 1.1 years
17
Table of Contents
The range of exercise prices for options outstanding and exercisable at March 31, 2010 was
$6.16 to $13.30. The following table summarizes information about stock options outstanding under
all stock plans at March 31, 2010:
Options Outstanding | Options Exercisable | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Average | Weighted- | Weighted | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Range of | Number | Contractual Life | Average | Number | Average | |||||||||||||||||||
Exercise | Prices | Outstanding | (Years) | Exercise Price | Exercisable | Exercise Price | ||||||||||||||||||
$6.16 |
| $7.30 | 235,346 | 4.85 | $ | 6.97 | 218,706 | $ | 7.01 | |||||||||||||||
7.40 |
| 7.93 | 242,854 | 3.66 | 7.69 | 239,667 | 7.69 | |||||||||||||||||
7.95 |
| 8.62 | 236,789 | 3.54 | 8.23 | 233,133 | 8.23 | |||||||||||||||||
8.63 |
| 9.16 | 348,127 | 5.33 | 9.03 | 335,537 | 9.02 | |||||||||||||||||
9.19 |
| 10.56 | 250,467 | 5.10 | 9.83 | 231,976 | 9.84 | |||||||||||||||||
10.63 |
| 10.70 | 224,406 | 3.73 | 10.69 | 224,406 | 10.69 | |||||||||||||||||
10.72 |
| 11.55 | 226,970 | 4.05 | 11.14 | 223,824 | 11.14 | |||||||||||||||||
11.60 |
| 11.84 | 435,600 | 3.85 | 11.74 | 435,600 | 11.74 | |||||||||||||||||
12.16 |
| 12.71 | 21,400 | 3.44 | 12.55 | 21,400 | 12.55 | |||||||||||||||||
13.30 |
| 13.30 | 12,000 | 3.29 | 13.30 | 12,000 | 13.30 | |||||||||||||||||
$6.16 |
| $13.30 | 2,233,959 | 4.27 | $ | 9.64 | 2,176,249 | $ | 9.67 |
The intrinsic value and contractual life of the options outstanding and exercisable at March
31, 2010 were as follows:
Weighted Average | ||||||||
Contractual | ||||||||
Life (years) | Intrinsic Value | |||||||
Options Outstanding |
4.27 | $ | 0 | |||||
Options Exercisable |
4.19 | $ | 0 |
The intrinsic value is based on the share price of $6.18 at March 31, 2010.
The following table summarizes the stock option activity for the three months ended March 31, 2010:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Options | Exercise | |||||||
Outstanding | Price | |||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2009 |
2,260,853 | $ | 9.80 | |||||
Granted |
| | ||||||
Exercised |
| | ||||||
Expired |
(18,584 | ) | 29.43 | |||||
Forfeited |
(8,310 | ) | 8.76 | |||||
Outstanding at March 31, 2010 |
2,233,959 | $ | 9.64 | |||||
Exercisable at March 31, 2010 |
2,176,249 | $ | 9.67 |
Performance Units
The company grants performance units to certain executive officers. Shares are earned upon
achievement of defined performance goals such as revenue and earnings. These units may be subject
to a service period thereafter before vesting. The performance units are amortized based
18
Table of Contents
on the estimated achievement of the performance goals. The fair value of the performance units
issued is based on the companys stock price on the date the performance units are granted.
During the three months ended March 31, 2010, the company granted 85,000 performance units with a
grant date fair value of $0.5 million. In the first quarter of 2010, the company did not record
any cancellations of performance units and no performance shares vested.
For the three months ended March 31, 2009, the company did not issue any performance units and did
not record any cancellations of performance units. In the first quarter 2009, 10,342 performance
shares vested with a grant date fair value of $82 and intrinsic fair value of $50. As of March 31,
2010, the unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of the companys
performance units was approximately $0.8 million, to be recognized through 2016 over a weighted
average period of 2.4 years
The following table summarizes the performance share activity during the three months ended March
31, 2010:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Unvested Performance Units December 31, 2009 |
86,002 | $ | 9.65 | |||||
Units awarded |
85,000 | 6.22 | ||||||
Units vested |
| | ||||||
Units cancelled |
| | ||||||
Unvested Performance Units March 31, 2010 |
171,002 | $ | 7.94 |
Restricted Stock Units
The company grants restricted stock units as employee incentives as permitted under the companys
1997 Stock Plan. Employee restricted stock units are time-based awards and are amortized over the
vesting period. At the vesting date, these units are converted to shares of common stock. These
units vest over various periods, but typically vest over four years. The fair value of the
restricted stock units issued is based on the companys stock price on the date the restricted
stock units are granted.
The company issued 6,000 time-based restricted stock units with a fair value of $37 to employees
during the three months ended March 31, 2010. The company issued 26,350 time-based restricted
stock units with a fair value of $179 to employees during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
As of March 31, 2010, the unrecognized compensation expense related to the unvested portion of the
companys restricted stock units was approximately $47, to be recognized through 2014 over a
weighted average period of 2.5 years
The following table summarizes the restricted stock unit activity during the three months
ended March 31, 2010:
Weighted | ||||||||
Average | ||||||||
Grant Date | ||||||||
Shares | Fair Value | |||||||
Unvested Restricted Stock Units December 31, 2009 |
2,500 | $ | 5.86 | |||||
Units awarded |
6,000 | 6.22 | ||||||
Units vested |
| | ||||||
Units cancelled |
| | ||||||
Unvested Restricted Stock Units March 31, 2010 |
8,500 | $ | 6.11 |
Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP)
The ESPP enables eligible employees to purchase common stock at the lower of 85% of the fair market
value of the common stock on the first or last day of each offering period. Each offering period
is six months. The company received proceeds of $0.2 million from the issuance of 44,360 shares
under the ESPP in February 2010 and received proceeds of $0.2 million from the issuance of 42,350
shares under the ESPP in February 2009.
19
Table of Contents
Based on the 15% discount and the fair value of the option feature of this plan, this plan is
considered compensatory. Compensation expense is calculated using the fair value of the employees
purchase rights under the Black-Scholes model.
The company calculated the fair value of each employee stock purchase grant on the date of grant
using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model using the following assumptions:
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Dividend yield |
None |
None |
||||||
Risk-free interest rate |
0.4 | % | 0.6 | % | ||||
Expected volatility |
49 | % | 47 | % | ||||
Expected life (in years) |
0.5 | 0.5 |
The risk-free interest rate was based on the U.S. Treasury yields with remaining term that
approximates the expected life of the shares granted. The company uses a dividend yield of None
in the valuation model for shares related to the Purchase Plan. The company has only paid one cash
dividend in its history which was paid in May 2008. This special dividend was a partial
distribution of the proceeds received from the sale of MSG. The company does not anticipate the
payment of regular dividends in the future. The company calculates the volatility based on a
five-year historical period of the companys stock price. The expected life used is based on the
length of the offering period.
Short Term Bonus Incentive Plan (STIP)
For the companys 2008 and 2009 STIP, bonuses were paid in the companys common stock to executives
and in cash to non-executives. The shares earned under the plan were issued in the first quarter
following the end of the fiscal year. In February 2010, the company issued 2,873 shares, net of
shares withheld for payment of withholding tax, under the 2009 STIP. In February 2009, the company
issued 90,173 shares, net of shares withheld for payment of withholding tax, under the 2008 STIP.
For the 2010 STIP, executive bonuses earned will be paid 50% in cash and 50% in shares of the
companys common stock, and all non-executive bonuses will be paid in cash.
Board of Director Equity Awards
Beginning in 2009, the Board of Directors elected to receive their annual equity award in the form
of shares of the companys stock or in shares of vested restricted stock units. The director
shares are awarded annually in June.
Employee Withholding Taxes on Stock Awards
For ease in administering the issuance of stock awards, the company holds back shares of vested
restricted stock awards and short-term incentive plan stock awards for the value of the statutory
withholding taxes. The company paid $0.7 million for withholding taxes related to stock awards
during each of the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Stock Repurchases
The company repurchases shares of common stock under share repurchase programs authorized by the
Board of Directors. All share repurchase programs are announced publicly. On November 21, 2008,
the Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of shares up to a value of $5.0 million. There
were no share repurchases during the first quarter of 2010 under this share repurchase program. At
March 31, 2010, the company had $2.5 million in share value that could be purchased under this
program. The company repurchased 19,994 shares at an average price of $4.26 during the three
months ended March 31, 2009.
20
Table of Contents
9. Comprehensive Income
The following table provides the calculation of other comprehensive income for the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net loss |
($795 | ) | ($1,864 | ) | ||||
Foreign currency translation adjustments |
(11 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gain on investments |
| 55 | ||||||
Total comprehensive loss |
($806 | ) | ($1,817 | ) | ||||
10. Restructuring
The company incurred restructuring expenses of $0 and $0.2 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. In order to reduce costs with the antenna operations in the
Bloomingdale, Illinois location, the company terminated thirteen employees during the three months
ended March 31, 2009. The company recorded $0.2 million in restructuring expense for severance
payments for these employees.
11. Commitments and Contingencies
Leases
The company has operating leases for office facilities through 2013 and office equipment through
2014. The future minimum rental payments under these leases at March 31, 2010, are as follows:
Year | Amount | |||
2010 |
$ | 417 | ||
2011 |
557 | |||
2012 |
551 | |||
2013 |
84 | |||
2014 |
11 | |||
Future minumum lease payments |
$ | 1,620 | ||
The company does not have any capital leases.
Warranty Reserve and Sales Returns
The company allows its major distributors and certain other customers to return unused product
under specified terms and conditions. The company accrues for product returns based on historical
sales and return trends. The companys allowance for sales returns was $0.2 million at March 31,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
The company offers repair and replacement warranties of primarily two years for antennas products
and one year for scanners and receivers. The companys warranty reserve is based on historical
sales and costs of repair and replacement trends. The warranty reserve was $0.2 million at March
31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, and is included in other accrued liabilities in the
accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheets.
21
Table of Contents
Changes in the warranty reserves during the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009 were as
follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Beginning balance |
$ | 228 | $ | 193 | ||||
Provisions for warranty |
3 | | ||||||
Consumption of reserves |
(18 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Ending balance |
$ | 213 | $ | 185 | ||||
Legal Proceedings
Litigation with Wider Networks LLC
In March 2009, the company filed in the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
Greenbelt Division, a lawsuit against Wider Networks, LLC claiming patent infringement, unfair
competition and false advertising, seeking damages as allowed pursuant to federal and Maryland law.
In June 2009, Telecom Network Optimization, LLC d/b/a Wider Networks, filed a lawsuit against the
company for patent infringement. These cases were consolidated by the court. On November 5, 2009,
the parties participated in a mandatory settlement conference and signed a binding Memorandum of
Understanding resolving all disputes. The consolidated cases were dismissed without prejudice on
November 6, 2009 and the company reached a settlement agreement with Wider on December 9, 2009.
Under the terms of the settlement, the company is the exclusive distributor of Widers WIND 3G
interference management system and the scanning receivers underlying those systems. The company
acquired all of the patented technology relating to Widers products for $1.2 million, of which
$0.8 million was paid at closing and $0.2 million is to be paid on the first and second anniversary
dates of the settlement agreement. The settlement leaves Wider in business to continue developing
and manufacturing its WIND 3G product and to retain ownership of all of its hardware design
know-how and copyrighted software code related to intellectual property. The settlement gives the
company another interference management product, suitable for certain markets, to distribute along
side CLARIFY®. See Note 5 for the accounting treatment of the Wider transaction.
12. Income Taxes
The company recorded an income tax benefit of $0.5 million in the three months ended March 31,
2010. This tax benefit for the three months ended March 31, 2010 differs from the statutory rate
of 35% by approximately 3% because of permanent tax differences and state and foreign taxes.
The company recorded a net income tax benefit of $0.6 million in the three months ended March 31,
2009. The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 differed from the statutory
rate of 35% by approximately 11% because of permanent differences and book to tax return
adjustments.
Significant management judgment is required to assess the likelihood that the companys deferred
tax assets will be recovered from future taxable income. The company maintains a valuation
allowance of $0.6 million against deferred tax assets because of uncertainties regarding whether
they will be realized.
The companys gross unrecognized tax benefit was $1.1 million both at March 31, 2010 and December
31, 2009.
The company files a consolidated federal income tax return, income tax returns with various states,
and foreign income tax returns in various foreign jurisdictions. The companys federal and state
income tax years, with limited exceptions, are closed through 2007. The company does not believe
that any of its tax positions will significantly change within the next twelve months.
The company classifies interest and penalties associated with the uncertain tax positions as a
component of income tax expense. There was no interest or penalties related to income taxes
recorded in the condensed consolidated financial statements.
13. Customer and Geographic Information
The company operates in one segment and there are no operating segments aggregated for
reporting purposes.
22
Table of Contents
The companys revenues to customers outside of the United States, as a percent of total revenues
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, are as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
Region | 2010 | 2009 | ||||||
Europe, Middle East, & Africa |
27 | % | 24 | % | ||||
Asia Pacific |
9 | % | 20 | % | ||||
Other Americas |
8 | % | 7 | % | ||||
Total Foreign sales |
44 | % | 51 | % | ||||
There were no customers representing 10% or more of revenues in the three months ended March 31,
2010. Revenue from the companys major customers representing 10% or more of total revenues for
the three months ended March 31, 2009 were as follows:
Three Months Ended | ||||
March 31, | ||||
Customer | 2009 | |||
Ascom |
10 | % |
Ascom, from which the company acquired scanning receiver assets in December 2009, continues to
purchase scanning receiver products from the company. Ascom acquired Comarcos WTS business in
January 2009. Comarcos scanning receiver business was a small part of Comarcos WTS segment.
14. Benefit Plans
Employee Benefit Plans
The companys 401(k) plan covers all of the U.S. employees beginning the first of the month
following the month they begin their employment. Under this plan, employees may elect to
contribute up to 15% of their current compensation to the 401(k) plan up to the statutorily
prescribed annual limit. The company may make discretionary contributions to the 401(k) plan. The
company made employer contributions of $133 and $146 to the 401(k) plan for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. The company also contributes to various retirement plans
for foreign employees. The company made contributions to these plans of $2 for the three months
ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan
The company provides an Executive Deferred Compensation Plan for executive officers and senior
managers. Under this plan, the executives may defer up to 50% of salary and 100% of cash bonuses.
In addition, the company provides a 4% matching cash contribution which vests over three years
subject to the executives continued service. The executive has a choice of investment
alternatives from a menu of mutual funds. The plan is administered by the Compensation Committee
and an outside party tracks investments and provides the executives with quarterly statements
showing relevant contribution and investment data. Upon termination of employment, death,
disability or retirement, the executive will receive the value of his or her account in accordance
with the provisions of the plan. Upon retirement, the executive may request to receive either a
lump sum payment, or payments in annual installments over 15 years or over the lifetime of the
participant with 20 annual payments guaranteed. The deferred compensation obligation included in
Long-Term Liabilities in the condensed consolidated balance sheets was $1.0 million at March 31,
2010 and $0.9 million at December 31, 2009. The company funds the obligation related to the
Executive Deferred Compensation Plan with corporate-owned life insurance policies. The cash
surrender value of such policies is included in Other Non-Current Assets.
23
Table of Contents
15. Stockholders Equity
The following table is a summary of the activity in stockholders equity during the three
months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Number of common shares outstanding: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
18,494 | 18,236 | ||||||
Common stock repurchases |
| (20 | ) | |||||
Stock-based compensation, net of taxes |
598 | 621 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
19,092 | 18,837 | ||||||
Common stock: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 18 | $ | 18 | ||||
Stock-based compensation, net of taxes |
1 | 1 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 19 | $ | 19 | ||||
Additional paid-in capital: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 138,141 | $ | 137,930 | ||||
Stock-based compensation, net of taxes |
512 | 113 | ||||||
Common stock repurchases |
| (85 | ) | |||||
Tax Effect from stock-based
compensation |
(94 | ) | | |||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 138,559 | $ | 137,958 | ||||
Accumulated deficit: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
($17,122 | ) | ($12,639 | ) | ||||
Net loss |
(795 | ) | (1,864 | ) | ||||
Balance at end of period |
($17,917 | ) | ($14,503 | ) | ||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income: |
||||||||
Balance at beginning of period |
$ | 31 | $ | 9 | ||||
Foreign translation |
(11 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||
Unrealized gain on investments |
| 55 | ||||||
Balance at end of period |
$ | 20 | $ | 56 | ||||
Total stockholders equity |
$ | 120,681 | $ | 123,530 | ||||
24
Table of Contents
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following information should be read in conjunction with the condensed consolidated financial
statements and the notes thereto included in Item 1 of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q and in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2009
contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed on March 16, 2010. Except for historical
information, the following discussion contains forward looking statements that involve risks and
uncertainties, including statements regarding our anticipated revenues, profits, costs and expenses
and revenue mix. These forward-looking statements include, among others, those statements
including the words may, will, plans, seeks, expects, anticipates, intends,
believes and words of similar import. Such statements constitute forward-looking statements
within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. You should not place
undue reliance on these forward-looking statements. Our actual results could differ materially
from those anticipated in these forward-looking statements.
Introduction
PCTEL focuses on wireless broadband technology related to propagation and optimization. We design
and develop software-based radios for wireless network optimization and develop and distribute
innovative antenna solutions. Our scanning receivers, receiver-based products and interference
management solutions are used to measure, monitor and optimize cellular networks. Our antenna
solutions address public safety, military, and government applications; Supervisory Control and
Data Acquisition (SCADA), Health Care, Energy, Smart Grid and Agricultural applications; Indoor
Wireless, Wireless Backhaul, and cellular applications. Its portfolio includes a broad range of
antennas for worldwide interoperability for microwave access (WiMAX), land mobile radio (LMR)
antennas, and global positioning systems (GPS) antennas that serve innovative applications in
telemetry, radio frequency identification (RFID), Wi-Fi, fleet management, and mesh networks.
PCTELs products are sold worldwide through direct and indirect channels.
We have an intellectual property portfolio related to antennas, the mounting of antennas, and
scanning receivers. These patents are being held for defensive purposes and are not part of an
active licensing program.
On January 12, 2010, we acquired Sparco Technologies, Inc. (Sparco), a San Antonio, Texas based
company that specializes in selling value-added Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) products and
services to the enterprise, education, hospitality, and healthcare markets. Sparcos product line
includes antennas for WLAN, National Electrical Manufacturers Association (NEMA) enclosures and
mounting accessories, site survey tools, and amplifiers. With this acquisition, we extended our
product offering, channel penetration and technology base in wireless enterprise products. We are
integrating the Sparco operations into our antenna products group.
On December 30, 2009 we acquired all of the assets related to the scanning receiver business from
Ascom. This business was a small part of Comarcos WTS segment, a business that Ascom acquired in
2009. Under the agreement, we will continue to supply both our scanning receivers and the WTS
scanning receivers to the newly formed Ascom that consolidated the testing businesses for mobile
telecom carriers of Ascom.
On December 9, 2009, we acquired from Wider Networks, its interference management patents as well
as the exclusive distribution rights for Widers interference management products as part of a
settlement agreement. The settlement agreement provided for a purchase of assets in the form of
patented technology, trade names and trademarks, and exclusive distribution rights. The settlement
gives us another interference management product, suitable for certain markets, to distribute along
side our CLARIFY® product.
On January 5, 2009, we acquired all of the outstanding share capital of Wi-Sys Communications Inc.
(Wi-Sys), a Canadian manufacturer of products for GPS, terrestrial and satellite communication
systems, including programmable GPS receivers and high performance antennas. The Wi-Sys product
line augments our GPS antenna product line. During the second quarter 2009, we exited the Wi-Sys
Canadian facility
and fully integrated the Wi-Sys product lines into our antenna product operations in Bloomingdale,
Illinois. During 2009 we incurred a restructuring charge of $0.2 million for employee severance,
lease termination costs, and asset dispositions related to the integration.
While we have both scanning receiver and antenna product lines, we operate in one business segment.
The product lines share sufficient management and resources that the financial reporting upon
which the Chief Operating Decision Maker (CODM) relies upon for allocating resources and
assessing performance, is based on company-wide data. Beginning in 2009, we re-evaluated the
internal financial reporting process in which the CODM no longer reviews the financial information
for Licensing, a reporting segment that licensed an intellectual property portfolio in the area of
analog modem technology. As of June 30, 2009, the revenues and cash flows associated with this
Licensing were substantially complete.
Current Economic Environment
General domestic and global economic conditions continue to be negatively impacted resulting in
reduced corporate spending, and decreased
25
Table of Contents
consumer confidence. These economic conditions have negatively impacted several elements of our
business and have resulted in our facing one of the most challenging periods in our history. It is
uncertain how long the current economic conditions will last or how quickly any subsequent economic
recovery will occur. If the economic recovery is slow to occur, our business, financial condition
and results of operations could be further materially and adversely affected.
Results of Operations
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands)
Three Months Ended March 31, 2010 and 2009
(in thousands)
Revenues
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Revenue |
$ | 15,573 | $ | 14,139 | ||||
Percent change from year ago period |
10.1 | % | (22.7 | %) |
Revenues increased 10.1% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the same period in
2009. In the three months ended March 31, 2010 versus the comparable period in the prior year,
approximately 13% of the increase is attributable to antennas, offsetting approximately a 2%
decrease attributable to scanning receivers. Revenue from our acquisitions as well as organic
growth contributed to the increase in revenue. Antenna product revenues were higher than the same
period last year from a recovery in LMR product segment through our distribution channel.
Gross Profit
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Gross profit |
$ | 7,219 | $ | 6,671 | ||||
Percentage of revenue |
46.4 | % | 47.2 | % | ||||
Percent of revenue change from year ago period |
(0.8 | %) | (0.7 | %) |
The gross profit percentage of 46.4% in the three months ended March 31, 2010 was 0.8% lower than
the comparable period in fiscal 2009. A higher sales mix of antenna products versus scanning
products caused overall margin percent to be lower. For the percentage change in the three months
ended March 31, 2010 versus the comparable period in the prior year, negative 1.2% related to
scanning receivers and positive 0.4% related to antennas. Antenna margins were improved as we
leveraged fixed costs over greater revenue.
Research and Development
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Research and development |
$ | 3,085 | $ | 2,688 | ||||
Percentage of revenues |
19.8 | % | 19.0 | % | ||||
Percent change from year ago period |
14.8 | % | 23.0 | % |
Research and development expenses increased approximately $0.4 million for the three months ended
March 31, 2010 compared to the comparable period in 2009. We invested an additional $0.4 million
in scanning receiver development, approximately half of which is related to the acquisition of the
Ascom scanning receiver business in December 2009.
26
Table of Contents
Sales and Marketing
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Sales and marketing |
$ | 2,259 | $ | 2,083 | ||||
Percentage of revenues |
14.5 | % | 14.7 | % | ||||
Percent change from year ago period |
8.4 | % | (24.6 | %) |
Sales and marketing expenses include costs associated with the sales and marketing employees, sales
representatives, product line management, and trade show expenses.
Sales and marketing expenses increased approximately $0.2 million for the three months ended March
31, 2010 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009 due to investment in U.S. sales employees and
expenses related to the Sparco acquisition.
General and Administrative
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
General and administrative |
$ | 2,552 | $ | 2,533 | ||||
Percentage of revenues |
16.4 | % | 17.9 | % | ||||
Percent change from year ago period |
0.8 | % | (8.6 | %) |
General and administrative expenses include costs associated with the general management, finance,
human resources, information technology, legal, insurance, public company costs, and other
operating expenses to the extent not otherwise allocated to other functions.
General and administrative expenses were virtually unchanged for the three months ended March 31,
2010 compared to the same period in fiscal 2009.
Amortization of Other Intangible Assets
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Amortization of other intangible assets |
$ | 763 | $ | 553 | ||||
Percentage of revenues |
4.9 | % | 3.9 | % |
Amortization increased approximately $0.2 million in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared
to the same period in 2009 due to $0.4 million additional amortization from acquisitions during
2009 and the first quarter 2010, offsetting $0.2 million lower amortization
related to the intangible assets acquired from MAXRAD in 2004. Certain intangible assets of MAXRAD
were fully amortized as of December 31, 2009. The additional amortization relates to intangible
assets acquired from Sparco in January 2010, Ascom in December 2009 and from the Wider settlement
in December 2009.
Restructuring Charges
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Restructuring charges |
$ | | $ | 154 | ||||
Percentage of revenues |
| 1.1 | % |
There were no restructuring charges incurred during the three months ended March 31, 2010. During
the three months ended March 31, 2009 we recorded $0.2 million in restructuring expense for
severance payments. In order to reduce costs with the antenna operations in the Bloomingdale,
Illinois location, we terminated thirteen employees during the three months ended March 31, 2009.
27
Table of Contents
Impairment of Goodwill
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Impairment of goodwill |
$ | | $ | 1,485 | ||||
Percentage of revenues |
| 10.5 | % |
In March 2009, we recorded goodwill impairment of $1.5 million. This amount represented the
remaining $0.4 million of goodwill for Licensing and the $1.1 million in goodwill recorded with the
Wi-Sys acquisition in January 2009. We tested our goodwill for impairment because our market
capitalization was below our book value at March 31, 2009. We considered this market
capitalization deficit as a triggering event for testing goodwill for impairment.
Royalties
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Royalties |
$ | | $ | 200 | ||||
Percentage of revenues |
| 1.4 | % |
All royalty amounts represent royalties from Conexant. In May 2003, we completed the sale of
certain of our assets to Conexant Systems, Inc. (Conexant). Concurrent with this sale of assets,
we entered into a patent licensing agreement with Conexant. We received royalties under this
agreement on a quarterly basis through June 30, 2009. The royalty payments under this agreement
were completed on June 30, 2009 and we do not expect any additional royalties.
Other Income, Net
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Other income, net |
$ | 159 | $ | 165 | ||||
Percentage of revenues |
1.0 | % | 1.2 | % |
Other income, net consists primarily of interest income and foreign exchange gains and losses.
Other income, net was virtually unchanged in the three months ended March 31, 20010 compared to the
same period in 2009. Other income, net includes foreign exchange losses of $14 and $30 in the
three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
Benefit for Income Taxes
Three Months Ended | Three Months Ended | |||||||
March 31, 2010 | March 31, 2009 | |||||||
Benefit for income taxes |
($486 | ) | ($596 | ) | ||||
Effective tax rate |
37.9 | % | 24.2 | % |
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2010 differed from the statutory rate
of 35% by approximately 3% because of permanent differences and foreign and state taxes.
The effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2009 differed from the statutory rate
of 35% by approximately 11% because of
permanent differences and book to tax return adjustments.
We maintain valuation allowances due to uncertainties regarding realizability. At March 31, 2010
and December 31, 2009, respectively, we had a $0.6 million valuation allowance on our deferred tax
assets. The valuation allowance relates to deferred tax assets in tax jurisdictions in which we no
longer have significant operations. On a regular basis, management evaluates the recoverability of
deferred tax assets and the need for a valuation allowance. At such time as it is determined that
it is more likely than not that the deferred tax assets are realizable, the valuation allowance
will be reduced.
We regularly evaluate our estimates and judgments related to uncertain tax positions and when
necessary, establish contingency reserves to
28
Table of Contents
account for our uncertain tax positions. As we obtain more information via the settlement of tax
audits and through other pertinent information, these projections and estimates are reassessed and
may be adjusted accordingly. These adjustments may result in significant income tax provisions or
provision reversals.
Stock-based compensation expense
Total stock compensation expense for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was $1.0 million in the
condensed consolidated statement of operations, which included $0.7 million of restricted stock
amortization, $0.1 million for performance share amortization, $0.1 million for stock option and
stock purchase plan expenses, and $0.1 million for stock bonuses. Total stock compensation expense
for the three months ended March 31, 2009 was $0.8 million in the condensed consolidated statement
of operations, which included $0.7 million of restricted stock amortization and $0.1 million for
stock option expenses, stock purchase plan expenses and stock bonuses.
The following table summarizes the stock-based compensation expense by income statement line item
for the three months ended March 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively:
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cost of goods sold |
$ | 91 | $ | 112 | ||||
Research and development |
149 | 139 | ||||||
Sales and marketing |
209 | 137 | ||||||
General and administrative |
503 | 430 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 952 | $ | 818 | ||||
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Three Months Ended | ||||||||
March 31, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Net loss |
($795 | ) | ($1,864 | ) | ||||
Charges for depreciation, amortization, stock-based
compensation, and other non-cash items |
1,521 | 2,392 | ||||||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities |
(1,789 | ) | 821 | |||||
Net cash (used in) provided by operating activities |
(1,063 | ) | 1,349 | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(3,567 | ) | (10,388 | ) | ||||
Net cash provided by financing activities |
225 | 116 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of period |
$ | 31,129 | $ | 35,891 | ||||
Short-term investments at the end of period |
28,934 | 27,010 | ||||||
Long-term investments at the end of period |
12,406 | 14,319 | ||||||
Working capital at the end of period |
$ | 77,062 | $ | 81,888 |
Liquidity and Capital Resources Overview
At March 31, 2010, our cash and investments were approximately $72.4 million and we had working
capital of $77.1 million. The decrease in cash and investments of $3.1 million at March 31, 2010
compared to December 31, 2009 is due to $2.1 million of cash used for the acquisition of Sparco,
$1.1 million in negative cash flow from operations, and $0.1 million in cash used for capital
expenditures, net of $0.2
million of cash provided by proceeds from issuance of the companys common stock.
Within operating activities, we are historically a net generator of operating funds from our income
statement activities and a net user of operating funds for balance sheet expansion. Due to our
increased revenues in the first quarter 2010 and related increase in accounts receivable, we were a
net user of funds from our balance sheet during the first quarter of 2010.
Within investing activities, capital spending historically ranges between 3% and 5% of our
revenues. The primary use of capital is for
29
Table of Contents
manufacturing and development engineering requirements. We historically have significant transfers
between investments and cash as we rotate our large cash balances and short-term investment
balances between money market funds, which are accounted for as cash equivalents, and other
investment vehicles. We have a history of supplementing our organic revenue growth with
acquisitions of product lines or companies, resulting in significant uses of our cash and
short-term investment balance from time to time. We expect the historical trend for capital
spending and the variability caused by moving money between cash and investments and periodic
merger and acquisition activity to continue in the future.
Within financing activities, we have historically generated funds from the exercise of stock
options and proceeds from the issuance of common stock through our Employee Stock Purchase Plan
(ESPP) and have historically used funds to repurchase shares of our common stock through our
share repurchase programs. Whether this activity results in our being a net user of funds versus a
net generator of funds is largely dependent on our stock price during any given year. Because our
stock price was within a historically low price range, we received no cash from the
exercise of stock options in the three months ended March 31, 2010.
Operating Activities:
Operating activities used $1.1 million of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2010,
whereas operating activities generated $1.3 million of cash during the three months ended March 31,
2009. The use of cash for the three months ended March 31, 2010 is primarily due to a net
expansion in the balance sheet. During the three months ended March 31, 2010, an increase in
accounts receivable of $2.9 million and a decrease in accounts payable of $0.5 million offset an
increase in accrued liabilities of $1.4 million. The accounts receivable increase is due to an
increase in revenues in the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the three months ended
December 31, 2009 and because of the timing of the revenues within each quarter. Revenues
increased $0.8 million during the three months ended March 31, 2010 compared to the previous
quarter. Further, revenues for the last month of the quarter ended March 31, 2010 were $1.5
million higher than the last month of the quarter ended December 31, 2009, and billings were $2.3
million higher in the last month of the quarter ended March 31, 2010 compared to the last month of
the quarter ended December 31, 2009. Our accrued liabilities increased due to increased inventory
receipts and bonus accruals. Our inventory purchases were higher at the end of the quarter ended
March 31, 2010 in order to meet our customer demand. The accruals at March 31, 2010 include
estimates for 2010 bonuses. There were no bonus accruals at December 31, 2009 because we did not
pay out any bonuses under our 2009 Short-Term Incentive Plan.
Operating activities provided $1.3 million of net cash during the three months ended March 31, 2009
primarily due to a net contraction in the balance sheet. Reduction in accounts receivables
provided $4.4 million in funds. The net accounts receivable reduction was attributable to
receivable collections and a $4.1 million decrease in revenues during the three months ended March
31, 2009 compared to the previous quarter. Payments of accounts payable and accrued liabilities
used $1.5 million and $1.7 million of cash, respectively. Our accrued liabilities declined due to
payment of year end 2008 bonuses and commissions. Accounts payable were lower due at March 31,
2009 compared to December 31, 2008 because we reduced our inventory purchases due to the decline in
revenues.
Investing Activities:
Our investing activities used $3.6 million of cash during the three months ended March 31, 2010.
We used $2.1 million for the acquisition of Sparco in January 2010 and we used $1.3 million related
to investment activity. Redemptions and maturities of our investments in short-term bonds during
the three months ended March 31, 2010 provided $8.4 million in funds. We rotated $9.7 million of
cash into new short-term and long-term bonds during the three months ended March 31, 2010. For the
three months ended March 31, 2010, our capital expenditures were $0.1 million. The rate of capital
expenditures in relation to revenues for the three months ended March 31, 2010 was below our
historical range.
Our investing activities used $10.4 million of cash in the three months ended March 31, 2009. We
used $2.3 million for the acquisition of Wi-Sys in January 2009 and we used $8.2 million related to
investment activity. Redemptions of short-term investments from our shares in the Bank of America
affiliated fund, the Columbia Strategic Cash Portfolio provided $2.5 million during the three
months ended March 31, 2009. We rotated $10.6 million of cash into short and long term investments
during the three months ended March 31, 2009. For the three months ended March 31, 2009, our
capital expenditures were $0.1 million.
Financing Activities:
Cash flow from financing activities provided $0.2 million for the three months ended March 31, 2010
from the purchase of shares through our ESPP.
Cash flow from financing activities provided $0.1 million for the three months ended March 31,
2009. Shares purchased through the ESPP contributed $0.2 million and we used $0.1 million to
repurchase our common stock under share repurchase programs.
30
Table of Contents
Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments
As of March 31, 2010, we had operating lease obligations of approximately $1.6 million through
2014. Operating lease obligations consist of $1.4 million for facility lease obligations and $0.2
million for equipment leases. Our lease obligations were $1.7 million at December 31, 2009.
With the acquisition of Sparco in January 2010, we assumed a lease for a facility with 6,300 square
feet of distribution and sales office space. The lease term ends in September 2010.
We had purchase obligations of $7.0 million and $7.4 million at March 31, 2010 and December 31,
2009, respectively. These obligations are for the purchase of inventory, as well as for other
goods and services in the ordinary course of business, and exclude the balances for purchases
currently recognized as liabilities on the balance sheet. We had a liability of $0.8 million
related to income tax uncertainties at March 31, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. We do
not know when this obligation will be paid.
Critical Accounting Policies and Estimates
We use certain critical accounting policies as described in Item 7. Managements Discussion
and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations Critical Accounting Policies and
Estimates of our Annual Report on Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission for
the year ended December 31, 2009 (the 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K). There have been no
material changes in any of our critical accounting policies since December 31, 2009. See Note 2 in
the Notes to the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements for discussion on recent accounting
pronouncements.
Item 3: Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
See our 2009 Annual Report on Form 10-K (Item 7A). As of March 31, 2010, there have been no
material changes in this information.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
Our management evaluated, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period
covered by this report. In designing and evaluating our disclosure controls and procedures,
management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated,
can only provide reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives, Based on that
evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded that as of the
end of the period covered by this report, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective to
provide reasonable assurance that information we are required to disclose in reports that we file
or submit under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is accumulated and communicated to our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as appropriate to
allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure, and that such information is recorded,
processed, summarized, and reported within time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange
Commission rules and forms. There have been no changes in our internal control over financial
reporting that occurred during the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q that have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over
financial reporting.
31
Table of Contents
PART II Other Information
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
None
Item 1A: Risk Factors
Factors That May Affect Our Business, Financial Condition and Future Operating Results
There have been no material changes with respect to the risk factors as previously disclosed in our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for our fiscal year ended December 31, 2009.
Item 2: Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
None.
Item 3: Defaults Upon Senior Securities
None.
Item 4: Reserved
Item 5: Other Information
None.
Item 6: Exhibits
Exhibit No. | Description | Reference | ||
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith | ||
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith | ||
32.1
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | Furnished herewith |
32
Table of Contents
SIGNATURE
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused
this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized:
PCTEL, Inc. |
||
a Delaware corporation |
||
/s/ Martin H. Singer
|
||
Martin H. Singer |
||
Chairman of the Board and |
||
Chief Executive Officer |
Date: May 7, 2010
33
Table of Contents
EXHIBIT INDEX
Exhibit No. | Description | Reference | ||
31.1
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith | ||
31.2
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Exchange Act Rules 13a-14(a) and 15d-14(a), as adopted pursuant to Section 302 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 | Filed herewith | ||
32.1
|
Certifications of Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002. | Furnished herewith |
34