Annual Statements Open main menu

PENNS WOODS BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2016 March (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549
 
FORM 10-Q
 
ý
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
 
for the Quarterly Period Ended March 31, 2016.
 
o
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act
 
For the Transition Period from                    to                   .
 
No. 0-17077
(Commission File Number)
 
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) 
PENNSYLVANIA
 
23-2226454
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
 
Identification No.)
 
300 Market Street, P.O. Box 967 Williamsport, Pennsylvania
 
17703-0967
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 

(570) 322-1111
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES ý NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES ý NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):
 
Large accelerated filer o
 
              Accelerated filer x
  Non-accelerated filer o
 
Small reporting company o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES o NO ý

On May 1, 2016 there were 4,733,252 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.


Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

 
 
Page
 
 
Number
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2

Table of Contents


Part I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.  Financial Statements
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
March 31,
 
December 31,
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
 
2016
 
2015
ASSETS:
 
 

 
 

Noninterest-bearing balances
 
$
22,371

 
$
22,044

Interest-bearing balances in other financial institutions
 
24,754

 
752

Total cash and cash equivalents
 
47,125

 
22,796

 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities, available for sale, at fair value
 
153,709

 
176,157

Investment securities, trading
 
60

 
73

Loans held for sale
 
514

 
757

Loans
 
1,041,252

 
1,045,207

Allowance for loan losses
 
(12,382
)
 
(12,044
)
Loans, net
 
1,028,870

 
1,033,163

Premises and equipment, net
 
22,158

 
21,830

Accrued interest receivable
 
3,878

 
3,686

Bank-owned life insurance
 
26,867

 
26,667

Investment in limited partnerships
 
746

 
899

Goodwill
 
17,104

 
17,104

Intangibles
 
2,078

 
1,240

Deferred tax asset
 
8,426

 
8,990

Other assets
 
6,602

 
6,695

TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
1,318,137

 
$
1,320,057

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES:
 
 

 
 

Interest-bearing deposits
 
$
790,219

 
$
751,797

Noninterest-bearing deposits
 
269,362

 
280,083

Total deposits
 
1,059,581

 
1,031,880

 
 
 
 
 
Short-term borrowings
 
15,874

 
46,638

Long-term borrowings
 
91,025

 
91,025

Accrued interest payable
 
439

 
426

Other liabilities
 
13,555

 
13,809

TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
1,180,474

 
1,183,778

 
 
 
 
 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
 
 

 
 

Preferred stock, no par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
 

 

Common stock, par value $8.33, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,005,534 and 5,004,984 shares issued
 
41,713

 
41,708

Additional paid-in capital
 
50,004

 
49,992

Retained earnings
 
58,888

 
58,038

Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
 
 

 
 

Net unrealized gain on available for sale securities
 
1,324

 
258

Defined benefit plan
 
(4,032
)
 
(4,057
)
Treasury stock at cost, 272,452 and 257,852 shares
 
(10,234
)
 
(9,660
)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
137,663

 
136,279

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
$
1,318,137

 
$
1,320,057

 
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
2016
 
2015
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
 
 

 
 

Loans, including fees
 
$
10,355

 
$
9,323

Investment securities:
 
 

 
 

Taxable
 
622

 
1,014

Tax-exempt
 
475

 
767

Dividend and other interest income
 
274

 
293

TOTAL INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
 
11,726

 
11,397

INTEREST EXPENSE:
 
 

 
 

Deposits
 
834

 
743

Short-term borrowings
 
26

 
19

Long-term borrowings
 
492

 
524

TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE
 
1,352

 
1,286

NET INTEREST INCOME
 
10,374

 
10,111

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
 
350

 
700

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
 
10,024

 
9,411

NON-INTEREST INCOME:
 
 

 
 

Service charges
 
532

 
553

Net securities gains, available for sale
 
435

 
661

Net securities gains, trading
 
40

 

Bank-owned life insurance
 
184

 
188

Gain on sale of loans
 
467

 
299

Insurance commissions
 
206

 
234

Brokerage commissions
 
255

 
245

Other
 
878

 
1,080

TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME
 
2,997

 
3,260

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
 
 

 
 

Salaries and employee benefits
 
4,580

 
4,470

Occupancy
 
541

 
628

Furniture and equipment
 
701

 
595

Pennsylvania shares tax
 
258

 
224

Amortization of investment in limited partnerships
 
152

 
165

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance
 
232

 
215

Marketing
 
210

 
129

Intangible amortization
 
87

 
82

Other
 
2,300

 
1,960

TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
 
9,061

 
8,468

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION
 
3,960

 
4,203

INCOME TAX PROVISION
 
882

 
848

NET INCOME
 
$
3,078

 
$
3,355

EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED
 
$
0.65

 
$
0.70

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED
 
4,740,503

 
4,801,505

DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
 
$
0.47

 
$
0.47

 
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents




PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
Net Income
 
$
3,078

 
$
3,355

Other comprehensive income:
 
 

 
 

Change in unrealized gain on available for sale securities
 
2,050

 
1,208

Tax effect
 
(697
)
 
(411
)
Net realized gain included in net income
 
(435
)
 
(661
)
Tax effect
 
148

 
225

   Amortization of unrecognized pension and post-retirement items
 
39

 

        Tax effect
 
(14
)
 

Total other comprehensive income
 
1,091

 
361

Comprehensive income
 
$
4,169

 
$
3,716

 
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
COMMON STOCK
 
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN CAPITAL
 
RETAINED EARNINGS
 
ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
 
TREASURY STOCK
 
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
SHARES
 
AMOUNT
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2014
 
5,002,649

 
$
41,688

 
$
49,896

 
$
53,107

 
$
(1,667
)
 
$
(7,057
)
 
$
135,967

Net income
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
3,355

 
 

 
 

 
3,355

Other comprehensive income
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
361

 
 

 
361

Dividends declared, ($0.47 per share)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(2,257
)
 
 

 
 

 
(2,257
)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan
 
520

 
5

 
18

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
23

Purchase of treasury stock (9,610 shares)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(445
)
 
(445
)
Balance, March 31, 2015
 
5,003,169

 
$
41,693

 
$
49,914

 
$
54,205

 
$
(1,306
)
 
$
(7,502
)
 
$
137,004

 
 
 
COMMON STOCK
 
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN CAPITAL
 
RETAINED EARNINGS
 
ACCUMULATED OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
 
TREASURY STOCK
 
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
SHARES
 
AMOUNT
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2015
 
5,004,984

 
$
41,708

 
$
49,992

 
$
58,038

 
$
(3,799
)
 
$
(9,660
)
 
$
136,279

Net income
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
3,078

 
 

 
 

 
3,078

Other comprehensive loss
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
1,091

 
 

 
1,091

Dividends declared, ($0.47 per share)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(2,228
)
 
 

 
 

 
(2,228
)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan
 
550

 
5

 
12

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
17

Purchase of treasury stock (14,600 shares)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(574
)
 
(574
)
Balance, March 31, 2016
 
5,005,534

 
$
41,713

 
$
50,004

 
$
58,888

 
$
(2,708
)
 
$
(10,234
)
 
$
137,663

 
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED) 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 

 
 

Net Income
 
$
3,078

 
$
3,355

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 

 
 

Depreciation and amortization
 
863

 
826

Amortization of intangible assets
 
87

 
82

Provision for loan losses
 
350

 
700

Accretion and amortization of investment security discounts and premiums
 
228

 
208

Net securities gains, available for sale
 
(435
)
 
(661
)
Originations of loans held for sale
 
(12,617
)
 
(9,424
)
Proceeds of loans held for sale
 
13,327

 
9,210

Gain on sale of loans
 
(467
)
 
(299
)
Net securities gains, trading
 
(40
)
 

Proceeds from the sale of trading securities
 
2,930

 

Purchases of trading securities
 
(2,877
)
 

Earnings on bank-owned life insurance
 
(184
)
 
(188
)
Decrease in deferred tax asset
 
15

 
114

Other, net
 
(1,516
)
 
(2,193
)
Net cash provided by operating activities
 
2,742

 
1,730

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
 

 
 

Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities
 
19,839

 
15,807

Proceeds from calls and maturities of available for sale securities
 
6,535

 
5,204

Purchases of available for sale securities
 
(3,270
)
 
(9,217
)
Net decrease (increase) in loans
 
3,918

 
(28,751
)
Acquisition of premises and equipment
 
(732
)
 
(128
)
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed assets
 
6

 
476

Purchase of bank-owned life insurance
 
(27
)
 
(27
)
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock
 
2,155

 
2,265

Purchases of regulatory stock
 
(989
)
 
(2,693
)
Net cash provided by (used for) investing activities
 
27,435

 
(17,064
)
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 

 
 

Net increase in interest-bearing deposits
 
38,422

 
12,217

Net decrease (increase) in noninterest-bearing deposits
 
(10,721
)
 
2,853

Proceeds from long-term borrowings
 

 
15,000

Net decrease in short-term borrowings
 
(30,764
)
 
(10,193
)
Dividends paid
 
(2,228
)
 
(2,257
)
Issuance of common stock
 
17

 
23

Purchases of treasury stock
 
(574
)
 
(445
)
Net cash (used for) provided by provided by financing activities
 
(5,848
)
 
17,198

NET INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 
24,329

 
1,864

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING
 
22,796

 
19,908

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING
 
$
47,125

 
$
21,772

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 
 

 
 

Interest paid
 
$
1,339

 
$
1,228

Income taxes paid
 
950

 
800

Transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate
 
25

 
7

 
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
Note 1.  Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Woods Investment Company, Inc., Woods Real Estate Development Company, Inc., Luzerne Bank, and Jersey Shore State Bank (Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank are referred to together as the “Banks”) and Jersey Shore State Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, The M Group, Inc. D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group (“The M Group”).  All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

The interim financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results for such periods.  The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are the same as those followed on an annual basis.  These policies are presented on pages 40 through 48 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

In reference to the attached financial statements, all adjustments are of a normal recurring nature pursuant to Rule 10-01(b) (8) of Regulation S-X.
 
Note 2.  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component as of March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
 
Net Unrealized Gain
on Available
for Sale Securities
 
Defined
Benefit 
Plan
 
Total
 
Net Unrealized Gain
on Available
for Sale Securities
 
Defined
Benefit 
Plan
 
Total
Beginning balance
 
$
258

 
$
(4,057
)
 
$
(3,799
)
 
$
2,930

 
$
(4,597
)
 
$
(1,667
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
 
1,353

 

 
1,353

 
797

 

 
797

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(287
)
 
25

 
(262
)
 
(436
)
 

 
(436
)
Net current-period other comprehensive income
 
1,066

 
25

 
1,091

 
361

 

 
361

Ending balance
 
$
1,324

 
$
(4,032
)
 
$
(2,708
)
 
$
3,291

 
$
(4,597
)
 
$
(1,306
)

The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss as of March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows:

Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components
 
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Affected Line Item
 in the Consolidated 
Statement of Income
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
 
Net unrealized gain on available for sale securities
 
$
435

 
$
661

 
Net securities gains, available for sale
Income tax effect
 
(148
)
 
(225
)
 
Income tax provision
Total reclassifications for the period
 
$
287

 
$
436

 
Net of tax
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net unrecognized pension costs
 
$
(39
)
 
$

 
Salaries and employee benefits
Income tax effect
 
14

 

 
Income tax provision
Total reclassifications for the period
 
$
(25
)
 
$

 
Net of tax





8

Table of Contents


Note 3.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (a new revenue recognition standard). The updates core principle is that a company will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, this update specifies the accounting for certain costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and expands disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. This update is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within that reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company's financial position or results of operation.

In August 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-15, Presentation of Financial Statements - Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40). The amendments in this update provide guidance in accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern and to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this update are effective for the annual period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual periods and interim periods thereafter. Early application is permitted. This update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-08, Business Combinations - Pushdown Accounting - Amendment to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 115. This ASU was issued to amend various SEC paragraphs pursuant to the issuance of Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 115. This update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contract with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments in this update defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. The Company is evaluating the effect of adopting this new accounting update.

In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-15, Interest-Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30) Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting. This ASU adds SEC paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Announcement at the June 18, 2015 Emerging Issues Task Force meeting about the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements. This update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU 2015-17, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes.
The amendments in this update require that deferred tax liabilities and assets be classified as noncurrent in a classified statement of financial position. The amendments in this update apply to all entities that present a classified statement of financial position. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those annual periods. For all other entities, the amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018. Earlier application is permitted for all entities as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The amendments in this update may be applied either prospectively to all deferred tax liabilities and assets or retrospectively to all periods presented. This update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This update applies to all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities and is intended to provide more useful information on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Among other things, this update (a) requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (b) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; (c) eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (d) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (e) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (f) requires an entity to present separately in other comprehensive income the portion of the total change in the fair value of a liability resulting from a change in the instrument specific credit risk when the entity has elected to measure the liability at fair value in accordance with the fair value option for

9

Table of Contents


financial instruments; (g) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (h) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities including not-for-profit entities and employee benefit plans within the scope of Topics 960 through 965 on plan accounting, the amendments in this update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities that are not public business entities may adopt the amendments in this update earlier as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet.  A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term.  A short-term lease is defined as one in which: (a) the lease term is 12 months or less, and (b) there is not an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. For short-term leases, lessees may elect to recognize lease payments over the lease term on a straight-line basis. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The amendments should be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-04, Liabilities - Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic 405-20). The standard provides that liabilities related to the sale of prepaid stored-value products within the scope of this Update are financial liabilities. The amendments in the Update provide a narrow scope exception to the guidance in Subtopic 405-20 to require that breakage for those liabilities be accounted for consistent with the breakage guidance in Topic 606. The amendments in this update are effective for public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Earlier application is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. This update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-05, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in this update apply to all reporting entities for which there is a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as a heading instrument under Topic 815. The standards in this update clarify that a change in the counterparty to a derivative instrument that has been designated as the hedging instrument under Topic 815 does not, in and of itself, require designation of that hedging relationship provided that all other hedge accounting criteria continue to be met. For public business entities, the amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments in this update are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018. An entity has an option to apply the amendments in this update on either a prospective basis or a modified retrospective basis. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. This update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 4. Per Share Data

There are no convertible securities which would affect the denominator in calculating basic and dilutive earnings per share.  There are 32,500 stock options outstanding, however, since the strike price of $42.03 is greater than the market price the options are not included in the denominator when calculating basic and dilutive earnings per share. Net income as presented on the consolidated statement of income will be used as the numerator.  The following table sets forth the composition of the weighted average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and dilutive earnings per share computation.

10

Table of Contents


 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Weighted average common shares issued
 
5,005,160

 
5,002,832

Average treasury stock shares
 
(264,657
)
 
(201,327
)
Weighted average common shares and common stock equivalents used to calculate basic and diluted earnings per share
 
4,740,503

 
4,801,505

 
Note 5. Investment Securities
 
The amortized cost and fair values of investment securities available for sale at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows:
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
Gross
 
 
 
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
(In Thousands)
 
Cost
 
Gains
 
Losses
 
Value
Available for sale (AFS)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$
3,474

 
$
4

 
$
(2
)
 
$
3,476

Mortgage-backed securities
 
9,465

 
337

 
(51
)
 
9,751

Asset-backed securities
 
1,826

 

 
(33
)
 
1,793

State and political securities
 
68,533

 
2,044

 
(2
)
 
70,575

Other debt securities
 
57,080

 
452

 
(1,317
)
 
56,215

Total debt securities
 
140,378

 
2,837

 
(1,405
)
 
141,810

Financial institution equity securities
 
8,924

 
834

 
(23
)
 
9,735

Other equity securities
 
2,401

 
15

 
(252
)
 
2,164

Total equity securities
 
11,325

 
849

 
(275
)
 
11,899

Total investment securities AFS
 
$
151,703

 
$
3,686

 
$
(1,680
)
 
$
153,709

 
 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
Gross
 
 
 
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
(In Thousands)
 
Cost
 
Gains
 
Losses
 
Value
Available for sale (AFS)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$
3,586

 
$

 
$
(37
)
 
$
3,549

Mortgage-backed securities
 
9,785

 
284

 
(60
)
 
10,009

Asset-backed securities
 
1,960

 

 
(20
)
 
1,940

State and political securities
 
84,992

 
1,797

 
(234
)
 
86,555

Other debt securities
 
59,832

 
185

 
(2,245
)
 
57,772

Total debt securities
 
160,155

 
2,266

 
(2,596
)
 
159,825

Financial institution equity securities
 
10,397

 
1,100

 
(14
)
 
11,483

Other equity securities
 
5,214

 
70

 
(435
)
 
4,849

Total equity securities
 
15,611

 
1,170

 
(449
)
 
16,332

Total investment securities AFS
 
$
175,766

 
$
3,436

 
$
(3,045
)
 
$
176,157

 

11

Table of Contents


The amortized cost and fair values of trading investment securities at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 are as follows.

 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
Gross
 
 
 
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
(In Thousands)
 
Cost
 
Gains
 
Losses
 
Value
Trading
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial institution equity securities
 
$
60

 
$

 
$

 
$
60

Total equity securities
 
60

 

 

 
60

Total trading securities
 
$
60

 
$

 
$

 
$
60


 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
Gross
 
 
 
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
(In Thousands)
 
Cost
 
Gains
 
Losses
 
Value
Trading
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial institution equity securities
 
$
78

 
$

 
$
(5
)
 
$
73

Total equity securities
 
78

 

 
(5
)
 
73

Total trading securities
 
$
78

 
$

 
$
(5
)
 
$
73



Total net realized trading gains of $40,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were included in the Consolidated Statement of Income. There were no net realized trading gains for the corresponding period of 2015.

The following tables show the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time, that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
Less than Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months or Greater
 
Total
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
(In Thousands)
 
Value
 
Losses
 
Value
 
Losses
 
Value
 
Losses
Available for sale (AFS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$

 
$

 
$
1,378

 
$
(2
)
 
$
1,378

 
$
(2
)
Mortgage-backed securities
 
667

 
(2
)
 
3,723

 
(49
)
 
4,390

 
(51
)
Asset-backed securities
 
1,533

 
(29
)
 
260

 
(4
)
 
1,793

 
(33
)
State and political securities
 
1,396

 
(2
)
 

 

 
1,396

 
(2
)
Other debt securities
 
7,419

 
(158
)
 
22,030

 
(1,159
)
 
29,449

 
(1,317
)
Total debt securities
 
11,015

 
(191
)
 
27,391

 
(1,214
)
 
38,406

 
(1,405
)
Financial institution equity securities
 
146

 
(4
)
 
48

 
(19
)
 
194

 
(23
)
Other equity securities
 
295

 
(113
)
 
1,019

 
(139
)
 
1,314

 
(252
)
Total equity securities
 
441

 
(117
)
 
1,067

 
(158
)
 
1,508

 
(275
)
Total investment securities AFS
 
$
11,456

 
$
(308
)
 
$
28,458

 
$
(1,372
)
 
$
39,914

 
$
(1,680
)


12

Table of Contents


 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Less than Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months or Greater
 
Total
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
(In Thousands)
 
Value
 
Losses
 
Value
 
Losses
 
Value
 
Losses
Available for sale (AFS)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$

 
$

 
$
3,549

 
$
(37
)
 
$
3,549

 
$
(37
)
Mortgage-backed securities
 
6,081

 
(60
)
 

 

 
6,081

 
(60
)
Asset-backed securities
 
1,626

 
(16
)
 
314

 
(4
)
 
1,940

 
(20
)
State and political securities
 
7,345

 
(47
)
 
1,656

 
(187
)
 
9,001

 
(234
)
Other debt securities
 
24,381

 
(530
)
 
22,547

 
(1,715
)
 
46,928

 
(2,245
)
Total debt securities
 
39,433

 
(653
)
 
28,066

 
(1,943
)
 
67,499

 
(2,596
)
Financial institution equity securities
 

 

 
53

 
(14
)
 
53

 
(14
)
Other equity securities
 
2,363

 
(277
)
 
1,001

 
(158
)
 
3,364

 
(435
)
Total equity securities
 
2,363

 
(277
)
 
1,054

 
(172
)
 
3,417

 
(449
)
Total investment securities AFS
 
$
41,796

 
$
(930
)
 
$
29,120

 
$
(2,115
)
 
$
70,916

 
$
(3,045
)
 
At March 31, 2016 there were a total of 13 securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and 20 individual securities that were in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or greater.

The Company reviews its position quarterly and has determined that, at March 31, 2016, the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines and the Company does not intend to sell and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity.  The Company has concluded that the unrealized losses disclosed above are not other than temporary but are the result of interest rate changes, sector credit ratings changes, or company-specific ratings changes that are not expected to result in the non-collection of principal and interest during the period.

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at March 31, 2016, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

(In Thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
 
$
1,806

 
$
1,812

Due after one year to five years
 
31,032

 
31,106

Due after five years to ten years
 
79,232

 
79,456

Due after ten years
 
28,308

 
29,436

Total
 
$
140,378

 
$
141,810

 
Total gross proceeds from sales of securities available for sale were $19,839,000 and $15,807,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. 


13

Table of Contents


The following table represents gross realized gains and losses within the available for sale portfolio:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
Gross realized gains:
 
 

 
 

State and political securities
 
299

 
396

Other debt securities
 
32

 
74

Financial institution equity securities
 
82

 
155

Other equity securities
 
144

 
132

Total gross realized gains
 
$
557

 
$
757

 
 
 
 
 
Gross realized losses:
 
 

 
 

U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$

 
$

State and political securities
 

 
22

Other debt securities
 
81

 
32

Other equity securities
 
41

 
42

Total gross realized losses
 
$
122

 
$
96

 
The following table represents gross realized gains and losses within the trading portfolios:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
Gross realized gains:
 
 

 
 

Financial institution equity securities
 
$
6

 
$

Other equity securities
 
59

 

Total gross realized gains
 
$
65

 
$

 
 
 
 
 
Gross realized losses:
 
 

 
 

Financial institution equity securities
 
$
13

 
$

Other equity securities
 
12

 

Total gross realized losses
 
$
25

 
$


There were no impairment charges included in gross realized losses for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.

Investment securities with a carrying value of approximately $123,691,000 and $131,089,000 at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, respectively, were pledged to secure certain deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required by law.


Note 6. Loans

Management segments the Banks' loan portfolio to a level that enables risk and performance monitoring according to similar risk characteristics.  Loans are segmented based on the underlying collateral characteristics.  Categories include commercial, financial, and agricultural, real estate, and installment loans to individuals.  Real estate loans are further segmented into three categories: residential, commercial, and construction.








14

Table of Contents


The following table presents the related aging categories of loans, by segment, as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
 
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
Past Due
 
Past Due 90
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30 To 89
 
Days Or More
 
Non-
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
Current
 
Days
 
& Still Accruing
 
Accrual
 
Total
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
152,282

 
$
317

 
$

 
$
292

 
$
152,891

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
523,897

 
5,761

 
308

 
1,458

 
531,424

Commercial
 
296,145

 
802

 

 
9,312

 
306,259

Construction
 
25,111

 

 

 
278

 
25,389

Installment loans to individuals
 
26,290

 
412

 

 

 
26,702

 
 
1,023,725

 
$
7,292

 
$
308

 
$
11,340

 
1,042,665

Net deferred loan fees and discounts
 
(1,413
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(1,413
)
Allowance for loan losses
 
(12,382
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(12,382
)
Loans, net
 
$
1,009,930

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,028,870


 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
 
 
Past Due
 
Past Due 90
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30 To 89
 
Days Or More
 
Non-
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
Current
 
Days
 
& Still Accruing
 
Accrual
 
Total
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
162,312

 
$
164

 
$

 
$
1,596

 
$
164,072

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
517,753

 
6,827

 
714

 
889

 
526,183

Commercial
 
295,784

 
720

 
265

 
5,770

 
302,539

Construction
 
26,545

 
67

 

 
212

 
26,824

Installment loans to individuals
 
26,572

 
429

 

 

 
27,001

 
 
1,028,966

 
$
8,207

 
$
979

 
$
8,467

 
1,046,619

Net deferred loan fees and discounts
 
(1,412
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(1,412
)
Allowance for loan losses
 
(12,044
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(12,044
)
Loans, net
 
$
1,015,510

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,033,163

 
Purchased loans acquired are recorded at fair value on their purchase date without a carryover of the related allowance for loan losses.

Upon the acquisition of Luzerne Bank on June 1, 2013, the Company evaluated whether each acquired loan (regardless of size) was within the scope of ASC 310-30, Receivables-Loans and Debt Securities Acquired with Deteriorated Credit Quality.  Purchased credit-impaired loans are loans that have evidence of credit deterioration since origination and it is probable at the date of acquisition that the Company will not collect all contractually required principal and interest payments. There were no material increases or decreases in the expected cash flows of these loans between June 1, 2013 (the “acquisition date”) and March 31, 2016.  The fair value of purchased credit-impaired loans, on the acquisition date, was determined, primarily based on the fair value of loan collateral.  The carrying value of purchased loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality was $337,000 at March 31, 2016.

On the acquisition date, the preliminary estimate of the unpaid principal balance for all loans evidencing credit impairment acquired in the Luzerne Bank acquisition was $1,211,000 and the estimated fair value of the loans was $878,000. Total contractually required payments on these loans, including interest, at the acquisition date was $1,783,000. However, the Company’s preliminary estimate of expected cash flows was $941,000. At such date, the Company established a credit risk related non-accretable discount (a discount representing amounts which are not expected to be collected from either the customer or liquidation of collateral) of $842,000 relating to these impaired loans, reflected in the recorded net fair value. Such amount is reflected as a non-accretable fair value adjustment to loans. The Company further estimated the timing and amount of expected cash flows in excess of the estimated fair value and established an accretable discount of $63,000 on the acquisition date relating to these impaired loans.

15

Table of Contents


 

The following table presents additional information regarding loans acquired in the Luzerne Bank transaction with specific evidence of deterioration in credit quality:
(In Thousands)
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Outstanding balance
 
$
437

 
$
441

Carrying amount
 
337

 
341

 
There were no material increases or decreases in the expected cash flows of these loans between June 1, 2013 (the “acquisition date”) and March 31, 2016. There has been no allowance for loan losses recorded for acquired loans with specific evidence of deterioration in credit quality as of March 31, 2016.

The following table presents interest income the Banks would have recorded if interest had been recorded based on the original loan agreement terms and rate of interest for non-accrual loans and interest income recognized on a cash basis for non-accrual loans for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
(In Thousands)
 
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
 
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
 
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
 
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
4

 
$
1

 
$
12

 
$
8

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
32

 
14

 
5

 
9

Commercial
 
169

 
64

 
105

 
25

Construction
 
6

 

 
15

 
7

 
 
$
211

 
$
79

 
$
137

 
$
49


Impaired Loans

Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable the Banks will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  The Banks evaluate such loans for impairment individually and does not aggregate loans by major risk classifications.  The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “non-accrual loans,” although the two categories overlap.  The Banks may choose to place a loan on non-accrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value.  The amount of impairment for these types of loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loan.  When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.

Management evaluates individual loans in all of the commercial segments for possible impairment if the loan is greater than $100,000 and if the loan is either on non-accrual status or has a risk rating of substandard.  Management may also elect to measure an individual loan for impairment if less than $100,000 on a case-by-case basis.

Mortgage loans on one-to-four family properties and all consumer loans are large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans and are measured for impairment collectively. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as 90 days or less, generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Interest income for impaired loans is recorded consistent with the Banks' policy on non-accrual loans.




16

Table of Contents


The following table presents the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans by segment as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
Recorded
 
Unpaid Principal
 
Related
(In Thousands)
 
Investment
 
Balance
 
Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
304

 
$
304

 
$

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,598

 
1,598

 

Commercial
 
2,595

 
2,645

 

Construction
 
279

 
279

 

 
 
4,776

 
4,826

 

With an allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
291

 
291

 
219

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,533

 
1,646

 
353

Commercial
 
10,601

 
10,601

 
1,984

Construction
 

 

 

 
 
12,425

 
12,538

 
2,556

Total:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
595

 
595

 
219

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
3,131

 
3,244

 
353

Commercial
 
13,196

 
13,246

 
1,984

Construction
 
279

 
279

 

 
 
$
17,201

 
$
17,364

 
$
2,556



17

Table of Contents


 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Recorded
 
Unpaid Principal
 
Related
(In Thousands)
 
Investment
 
Balance
 
Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
319

 
$
319

 
$

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,142

 
1,142

 

Commercial
 
1,735

 
1,785

 

Construction
 
212

 
212

 

 
 
3,408

 
3,458

 

With an allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
150

 
150

 
75

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,573

 
1,703

 
376

Commercial
 
10,752

 
10,752

 
1,653

Construction
 

 

 

 
 
12,475

 
12,605

 
2,104

Total:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
469

 
469

 
75

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
2,715

 
2,845

 
376

Commercial
 
12,487

 
12,537

 
1,653

Construction
 
212

 
212

 

 
 
$
15,883

 
$
16,063

 
$
2,104

 
The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the three months ended for March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
(In Thousands)
 
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
 
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
533

 
$
4

 
$
1

 
$
1,149

 
$
5

 
$
7

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
2,899

 
22

 
14

 
1,644

 
12

 
5

Commercial
 
12,829

 
82

 
63

 
14,773

 
71

 
25

Construction
 
245

 

 
1

 
719

 

 
7

 
 
$
16,506

 
$
108

 
$
79

 
$
18,285

 
$
88

 
$
44


Currently, there is $23,000 committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The loan portfolio also includes certain loans that have been modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced or are expected to experience financial difficulties.  These concessions typically result from loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions.  Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months.


18

Table of Contents


There were no loan modifications that were considered TDRs completed during the three months ended March 31, 2016. Loan modifications that are considered TDRs completed during the three months ended March 31, 2015 and were as follows:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
2015
(In Thousands, Except Number of Contracts)
 
Number
of
Contracts
 
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
2

 
$
97

 
$
97

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
5

 
234

 
234

Commercial
 
1

 
270

 
270

Construction
 

 

 

 
 
8

 
$
601

 
$
601


Of the eight new troubled debt restructurings granted for the three months ended March 31, 2015, two loans totaling $97,000 were granted term concessions and six loans totaling $504,000 were granted concessions due to other default. All of the loans with modifications considered TDRs for the three months ended March 31, 2015 had a specific allowance within the allowance for loan losses.

There were five loan modifications considered to be TDRs made during the twelve months previous to March 31, 2016 that defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2016.  The defaulted loan types and recorded investments at March 31, 2016 are as follows: one commercial loan with a recorded investment of $103,000, one commercial real estate loan with a recorded investment of $239,000, and three residential real estate loan with a recorded investment of $173,000. There was one loan modifications considered TDRs made during the twelve months previous to March 31, 2015 that defaulted during the three months ended March 31, 2015. The loan that defaulted is a commercial real estate loans with a recorded investment of $48,000 at March 31, 2015.

Troubled debt restructurings amounted to $9,503,000 and $9,645,000 as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.

The amount of foreclosed residential real estate held at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, totaled $126,000 and $102,000, respectively. Consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, totaled $938,000 and $448,000, respectively.

Internal Risk Ratings

Management uses a ten point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first six categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The special mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a substandard classification. Loans in the substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due are evaluated for substandard classification.  Loans in the doubtful category exhibit the same weaknesses found in the substandard loans, however, the weaknesses are more pronounced.  Such loans are static and collection in full is improbable.  However, these loans are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur which would salvage the debt.  Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and charge-off is imminent.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Banks have a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight.  Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the pass category unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, repossession, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event.  An external annual loan review of large commercial relationships is performed, as well as a sample of smaller transactions. Confirmation of the appropriate risk category is included in the review. Detailed reviews, including plans for resolution, are performed on loans classified as substandard, doubtful, or loss on a quarterly basis.

The following table presents the credit quality categories identified above as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

19

Table of Contents


 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Totals
Pass
 
$
151,347

 
$
527,868

 
$
284,453

 
$
25,111

 
$
26,702

 
$
1,015,481

Special Mention
 
1,238

 
808

 
5,573

 

 

 
7,619

Substandard
 
306

 
2,748

 
16,233

 
278

 

 
19,565

 
 
$
152,891

 
$
531,424

 
$
306,259

 
$
25,389

 
$
26,702

 
$
1,042,665

 

 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Totals
Pass
 
$
160,734

 
$
522,853

 
$
277,248

 
$
26,612

 
$
27,001

 
$
1,014,448

Special Mention
 
1,669

 
823

 
8,625

 

 

 
11,117

Substandard
 
1,669

 
2,507

 
16,666

 
212

 

 
21,054

 
 
$
164,072

 
$
526,183

 
$
302,539

 
$
26,824

 
$
27,001

 
$
1,046,619

 
Allowance for Loan Losses

An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to absorb losses from the loan portfolio.  The ALL is based on management’s continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions, diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated future loss experience, and the amount of non-performing loans.

The Banks' methodology for determining the ALL is based on the requirements of ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment (previously discussed) and ASC Subtopic 450-20 for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, as well as the Interagency Policy Statements on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and other bank regulatory guidance.  The total of the two components represents the Banks' ALL.

Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate.  Allowances are segmented based on collateral characteristics previously disclosed, and consistent with credit quality monitoring.  Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are grouped into two classes for evaluation.  A general allowance is determined for “Pass” rated credits, while a separate pool allowance is provided for “Criticized” rated credits that are not individually evaluated for impairment.

For the general allowances, historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio.  These historical loss amounts are modified by other qualitative factors.  A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a twelve quarter moving average.  However, management may adjust the moving average time frame by up to four quarters to adjust for variances in the economic cycle. Management has identified a number of additional qualitative factors which it uses to supplement the historical charge-off factor because these factors are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing loan pools to differ from historical loss experience.  The additional factors that are evaluated quarterly and updated using information obtained from internal, regulatory, and governmental sources are: national and local economic trends and conditions; levels of and trends in delinquency rates and non-accrual loans; trends in volumes and terms of loans; effects of changes in lending policies; experience, ability, and depth of lending staff; value of underlying collateral; and concentrations of credit from a loan type, industry and/or geographic standpoint.

Loans in the criticized pools, which possess certain qualities or characteristics that may lead to collection and loss issues, are closely monitored by management and subject to additional qualitative factors.  Management also monitors industry loss factors by loan segment for applicable adjustments to actual loss experience.

Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL.  When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ALL.

Activity in the allowance is presented for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
 
 

20

Table of Contents


 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Unallocated
 
Totals
Beginning Balance
 
$
1,532

 
$
5,116

 
$
4,217

 
$
160

 
$
243

 
$
776

 
$
12,044

Charge-offs
 

 

 

 

 
(51
)
 

 
(51
)
Recoveries
 

 
3

 
5

 
3

 
28

 

 
39

Provision
 
(278
)
 
4

 
250

 
(16
)
 
44

 
346

 
350

Ending Balance
 
$
1,254

 
$
5,123

 
$
4,472

 
$
147

 
$
264

 
$
1,122

 
$
12,382


 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Unallocated
 
Totals
Beginning Balance
 
$
1,124

 
$
3,755

 
$
4,205

 
$
786

 
$
245

 
$
464

 
$
10,579

Charge-offs
 
(20
)
 
(1
)
 
(449
)
 

 
(56
)
 

 
(526
)
Recoveries
 
26

 
24

 

 
11

 
12

 

 
73

Provision
 
348

 
449

 
117

 
(45
)
 
(8
)
 
(161
)
 
700

Ending Balance
 
$
1,478

 
$
4,227

 
$
3,873

 
$
752

 
$
193

 
$
303

 
$
10,826

 

The Company grants commercial, industrial, residential, and installment loans to customers primarily throughout north-east and central Pennsylvania. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on the economic conditions within this region.

The Company has a concentration of the following to gross loans at March 31, 2016 and 2015:
 
 
 
March 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Owners of residential rental properties
 
16.27
%
 
16.20
%
Owners of commercial rental properties
 
14.27
%
 
14.46
%
 
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment based on impairment method as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
Unallocated
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
 
Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
219

 
$
353

 
$
1,984

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
2,556

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
1,035

 
4,770

 
2,488

 
147

 
264

 
1,122

 
9,826

Total ending allowance balance
 
$
1,254

 
$
5,123

 
$
4,472

 
$
147

 
$
264

 
$
1,122

 
$
12,382

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
595

 
$
2,794

 
$
13,196

 
$
279

 
$

 


 
$
16,864

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 

 
337

 

 

 

 


 
337

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
152,296

 
528,293

 
293,063

 
25,110

 
26,702

 


 
1,025,464

Total ending loans balance
 
$
152,891

 
$
531,424

 
$
306,259

 
$
25,389

 
$
26,702

 


 
$
1,042,665

 

21

Table of Contents


 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
Unallocated
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
 
Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
75

 
$
376

 
$
1,653

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
2,104

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
1,457

 
4,740

 
2,564

 
160

 
243

 
776

 
9,940

Total ending allowance balance
 
$
1,532

 
$
5,116

 
$
4,217

 
$
160

 
$
243

 
$
776

 
$
12,044

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
469

 
$
2,374

 
$
12,487

 
$
212

 
$

 
 

 
$
15,542

Loans acquired with deteriorated credit quality
 

 
341

 

 

 

 
 
 
341

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
163,603

 
523,468

 
290,052

 
26,612

 
27,001

 
 

 
1,030,736

Total ending loans balance
 
$
164,072

 
$
526,183

 
$
302,539

 
$
26,824

 
$
27,001

 
 

 
$
1,046,619

 
Note 7.  Net Periodic Benefit Cost-Defined Benefit Plans

For a detailed disclosure on the Company’s pension and employee benefits plans, please refer to Note 13 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.

The following sets forth the components of the net periodic benefit/cost of the domestic non-contributory defined benefit plan for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
Service cost
 
$
17

 
$
16

Interest cost
 
193

 
189

Expected return on plan assets
 
(251
)
 
(281
)
Amortization of net loss
 
39

 
40

Net periodic benefit cost
 
$
(2
)
 
$
(36
)

Employer Contributions

The Company previously disclosed in its consolidated financial statements, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, that it expected to contribute a minimum of $500,000 to its defined benefit plan in 2016.  As of March 31, 2016, there were contributions of $250,000 made to the plan with additional contributions of at least $250,000 anticipated during the remainder of 2016.
 
Note 8.  Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company maintains an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”).  The Plan is intended to encourage employee participation in the ownership and economic progress of the Company.  The Plan allows for up to 1,000,000 shares to be purchased by employees.  The purchase price of the shares is 95% of market value with an employee eligible to purchase up to the lesser of 15% of base compensation or $12,000 in market value annually.  During the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, there were 550 and 520 shares issued under the plan, respectively.

Note 9.  Off Balance Sheet Risk

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.  These financial instruments are primarily comprised of commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and credit exposure from the sale of assets with recourse.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit,

22

Table of Contents


interest rate, or liquidity risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  The contract amounts of these instruments express the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss from nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments.  The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.  The Company may require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk.

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are as follows at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:

(In Thousands)
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
Commitments to extend credit
 
$
247,801

 
$
241,936

Standby letters of credit
 
5,402

 
4,786

Credit exposure from the sale of assets with recourse
 
7,167

 
6,523

 
 
$
260,370

 
$
253,245

 
Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to customers.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of fees.  Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements.  The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis.  The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company, on an extension of credit is based on management’s credit assessment of the counterparty.

Standby letters of credit represent conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  These instruments are issued primarily to support bid or performance related contracts.  The coverage period for these instruments is typically a one year period with an annual renewal option subject to prior approval by management.  Fees earned from the issuance of these letters are recognized upon expiration of the coverage period.  For secured letters of credit, the collateral is typically Bank deposit instruments or customer business assets.
 
Note 10.  Fair Value Measurements

The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value.
Level I:
 
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
 
 
 
Level II:
 
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
 
 
 
Level III:
 
Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.

The following table presents the assets reported on the balance sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

23

Table of Contents


 
 
March 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
 
Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Investment securities, available for sale:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$

 
$
3,476

 
$

 
$
3,476

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
9,751

 

 
9,751

Asset-backed securities
 

 
1,793

 

 
1,793

State and political securities
 

 
70,575

 

 
70,575

Other debt securities
 

 
56,215

 

 
56,215

Financial institution equity securities
 
9,735

 

 

 
9,735

Other equity securities
 
2,164

 

 

 
2,164

Investment securities, trading:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial institution equity securities
 
60

 

 

 
60

Total assets measured on a recurring basis
 
$
11,959

 
$
141,810

 
$

 
$
153,769

 

 
 
December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
 
Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Investment securities, available for sale:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$

 
$
3,549

 
$

 
$
3,549

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
10,009

 

 
10,009

Asset-backed securities
 

 
1,940

 

 
1,940

State and political securities
 

 
86,555

 

 
86,555

Other debt securities
 

 
57,772

 

 
57,772

Financial institution equity securities
 
11,483

 

 

 
11,483

Other equity securities
 
4,849

 

 

 
4,849

Investment securities, trading:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial institution equity securities
 
73

 

 

 
73

Total assets measured on a recurring basis
 
$
16,405

 
$
159,825

 
$

 
$
176,230

 
The following table presents the assets reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value on a non-recurring basis as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. 
 
 
March 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
 
Total
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Impaired loans
 
$

 
$

 
$
14,645

 
$
14,645

Other real estate owned
 

 

 
1,719

 
1,719

Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis
 
$

 
$

 
$
16,364

 
$
16,364


 
 
December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
 
Total
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Impaired loans
 
$

 
$

 
$
13,779

 
$
13,779

Other real estate owned
 

 

 
1,696

 
1,696

Total assets measured on a non-recurring basis
 
$

 
$

 
$
15,475

 
$
15,475

 

24

Table of Contents


The following tables present a listing of significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement process for items valued utilizing level III techniques as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
 
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
(In Thousands)
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation Technique(s)
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Range
 
Weighted Average
Impaired loans
 
$
5,370

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Temporary reduction in payment amount
 
0 to (70)%
 
(16)%
 
 
9,275

 
Appraisal of collateral
 
Appraisal adjustments (1)
 
0 to (20)%
 
(13)%
Other real estate owned
 
$
1,719

 
Appraisal of collateral (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.
 
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
(In Thousands)
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation Technique(s)
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Range
 
Weighted Average
Impaired loans
 
$
5,696

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Temporary reduction in payment amount
 
0 to (70)%
 
(17)%
 
 
8,083

 
Appraisal of collateral
 
Appraisal adjustments (1)
 
0 to (20)%
 
(15)%
Other real estate owned
 
$
1,696

 
Appraisal of collateral (1)
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique include temporary changes in payment amounts and the probability of default.  Significant increases (decreases) in payment amounts would result in significantly higher (lower) fair value measurements.  The probability of default is 0% for impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique because all defaulted impaired loans are valued using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique include appraisal adjustments, which are adjustments to appraisals by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.  The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s other real estate owned are the same inputs used to value impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.
 
Note 11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company is required to disclose fair values for its financial instruments.  Fair values are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.  These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.  Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intention to hold most of its financial instruments to maturity and not to engage in trading or sales activities.  Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors.  These fair values are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions can significantly affect the fair values.

Fair values have been determined by the Company using historical data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments.  The Company’s fair values, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s other financial instruments.

As certain assets and liabilities, such as deferred tax assets, premises and equipment, and many other operational elements of the Company, are not considered financial instruments but have value, this fair value of financial instruments would not represent the full market value of the Company.




25

Table of Contents















The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
 
 
Carrying
 
Fair
 
Fair Value Measurements at March 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Value
 
Value
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
Financial assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
47,125

 
$
47,125

 
$
47,125

 
$

 
$

Investment securities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Available for sale
 
153,709

 
153,709

 
11,899

 
141,810

 

Trading
 
60

 
60

 
60

 

 

Loans held for sale
 
514

 
514

 
514

 

 

Loans, net
 
1,028,870

 
1,068,941

 

 

 
1,068,941

Bank-owned life insurance
 
26,867

 
26,867

 
26,867

 

 

Accrued interest receivable
 
3,878

 
3,878

 
3,878

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest-bearing deposits
 
$
790,219

 
$
779,632

 
$
558,909

 
$

 
$
220,723

Noninterest-bearing deposits
 
269,362

 
269,362

 
269,362

 

 

Short-term borrowings
 
15,874

 
15,874

 
15,874

 

 

Long-term borrowings
 
91,025

 
92,582

 

 

 
92,582

Accrued interest payable
 
439

 
439

 
439

 

 

 
 
 
Carrying
 
Fair
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
 
Value
 
Value
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
Financial assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
22,796

 
$
22,796

 
$
22,796

 
$

 
$

Investment securities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Available for sale
 
176,157

 
176,157

 
16,332

 
159,825

 

Trading
 
73

 
73

 
73

 

 

Loans held for sale
 
757

 
757

 
757

 

 

Loans, net
 
1,033,163

 
1,045,140

 

 

 
1,045,140

Bank-owned life insurance
 
26,667

 
26,667

 
26,667

 

 

Accrued interest receivable
 
3,686

 
3,686

 
3,686

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest-bearing deposits
 
$
751,797

 
$
729,685

 
$
509,206

 
$

 
$
220,479

Noninterest-bearing deposits
 
280,083

 
280,083

 
280,083

 

 

Short-term borrowings
 
46,638

 
46,638

 
46,638

 

 

Long-term borrowings
 
91,025

 
91,783

 

 

 
91,783

Accrued interest payable
 
426

 
426

 
426

 

 

 

26

Table of Contents


Cash and Cash Equivalents, Loans Held for Sale, Accrued Interest Receivable, Short-term Borrowings, and Accrued Interest Payable:
The fair value is equal to the carrying value.

Investment Securities:
The fair value of investment securities available for sale and trading is equal to the available quoted market price. If no quoted market price is available, fair value is estimated using the quoted market price for similar securities.  Regulatory stocks’ fair value is equal to the carrying value.

Loans:
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics.  Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, financial, and agricultural, commercial real estate, residential real estate, construction real estate, and installment loans to individuals.  Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming categories.

The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan.  The estimate of maturity is based on the Company’s historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions.

Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is based on recent external appraisals.  If appraisals are not available, estimated cash flows are discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows.  Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discounted rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower information.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance:
The fair value is equal to the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies.

Deposits:
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand.  The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.

The fair value estimates above do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market, commonly referred to as the core deposit intangible.

Long Term Borrowings:
The fair value of long term borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.

Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit, and Financial Guarantees Written:
There is no material difference between the notional amount and the estimated fair value of off-balance sheet items.  The contractual amounts of unfunded commitments and letters of credit are presented in Note 9 (Off Balance Sheet Risk).
 
Note 12.  Stock Options

In 2014, the Company adopted the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan designed to help the Company attract, retain, and motivate employees and non-employee directors. Incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock may be granted as part of the plan.

On August 27, 2015, the Company issued 38,750 stock options to a group of employees. Each option granted has a strike price of $42.03 and is exercisable only after five years following the date of the grant of such options. The options expire ten years following the date of the grant of such options.

A summary of stock option activity is presented below:


27

Table of Contents


 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year
 
34,750

 
$
42.03

 

 
$

Granted
 

 

 
38,750

 
42.03

Exercised
 

 

 

 

Forfeited
 
(2,250
)
 
42.03

 
(4,000
)
 
42.03

Outstanding, end of year
 
32,500

 
$
42.03

 
34,750

 
$
42.03



The estimated fair value of options, including the effect of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straightline basis
over the options’ vesting periods while ensuring that the cumulative amount of compensation cost recognized at least equals the
value of the vested portion of the award at that date. The Company determines the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury bond with a similar term to the expected life of the options at the grant date. Expected volatility was estimated based on the adjusted historic volatility of the Company’s shares. The expected life was estimated to equal the contractual life of the options. The dividend yield rate was based upon recent historical dividends paid on shares.


Note 13.  Reclassification of Comparative Amounts

Certain comparative amounts for the prior period have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.
 
CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This Report contains certain “forward-looking statements” including statements concerning plans, objectives, future events or performance and assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical fact.  The Company cautions readers that the following important factors, among others, may have affected and could in the future affect the Company’s actual results and could cause the Company’s actual results for subsequent periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company herein:  (i) the effect of changes in laws and regulations, including federal and state banking laws and regulations, with which the Company must comply, and the associated costs of compliance with such laws and regulations either currently or in the future as applicable; (ii) the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies as well as by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or of changes in the Company’s organization, compensation and benefit plans; (iii) the effect on the Company’s competitive position within its market area of the  increasing consolidation within the banking and financial services industries, including the increased competition from larger regional and out-of-state banking organizations as well as non-bank providers of various financial services; (iv) the effect of changes in interest rates; (v) the effect of changes in the business cycle and downturns in the local, regional or national economies; and (vi) the Risk Factors identified in Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015 and in other filings made by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.

You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.  These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, even if subsequently made available by the Company on its website or otherwise.  The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

28

Table of Contents


Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

EARNINGS SUMMARY

Comparison of the Three Months Ended March 31, 2016 and 2015

Summary Results

The three months ended March 31, 2016 generated net income of $3,078,000 compared to $3,355,000 for the same period of 2015. Comparable results were impacted by a decrease in after-tax securities gains of $122,000 (from a gain of $436,000 to a gain of $314,000). Earnings per share, basic and dilutive, for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $0.65 compared to $0.70 for the comparable period of 2015. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.94% and 8.95% for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to 1.06% and 9.76% for the corresponding period of 2015. Operating earnings decreased to $2,764,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to $2,919,000 for the same period of 2015, as the 2015 period included non-recurring gains on the sale of other real estate owned of $270,000. Operating earnings per share for the three months ended March 31, 2016 were $0.58 basic and dilutive compared to $0.61 basic and dilutive for the three months ended March 31, 2015.

Management uses the non-GAAP measure of net income from core operations, or operating earnings, in its analysis of the Company’s performance.  This measure, as used by the Company, adjusts net income by excluding significant gains or losses that are unusual in nature.  Because certain of these items and their impact on the Company’s performance are difficult to predict, management believes the presentation of financial measures excluding the impact of such items provides useful supplemental information in evaluating the operating results of the Company’s core businesses.  For purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, net income from core operations, or operating earnings, means net income adjusted to exclude after-tax net securities gains or losses and bank-owned life insurance gains on death benefit.  These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for net income determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.

Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
GAAP net income
 
$
3,078

 
$
3,355

Less: net securities, net of tax
 
314

 
436

Non-GAAP operating earnings
 
$
2,764

 
$
2,919

 
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Return on average assets (ROA)
 
0.94
%
 
1.06
%
Less: net securities, net of tax
 
0.10
%
 
0.13
%
Non-GAAP operating ROA
 
0.84
%
 
0.93
%
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Return on average equity (ROE)
 
8.95
%
 
9.76
%
Less: net securities, net of tax
 
0.91
%
 
1.27
%
Non-GAAP operating ROE
 
8.04
%
 
8.49
%
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Basic earnings per share (EPS)
 
$
0.65

 
$
0.70

Less: net securities, net of tax
 
0.07

 
0.09

Non-GAAP basic operating EPS
 
$
0.58

 
$
0.61

 

29

Table of Contents


 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2016
 
2015
Dilutive EPS
 
$
0.65

 
$
0.70

Less: net securities, net of tax
 
0.07

 
0.09

Non-GAAP dilutive operating EPS
 
$
0.58

 
$
0.61

 
Interest and Dividend Income

Interest and dividend income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased to $11,726,000 compared to $11,397,000 for the same period of 2015.  Loan portfolio income increased as the impact of portfolio growth, due primarily to an increase in home equity products, offset a reduction in yield of 7 basis points (“bp”) due to the competitive landscape and the continued low rate environment that is impacting new loan rates as well as the variable rate segment of the loan portfolio.  The loan portfolio income increase was offset by a decrease in investment portfolio interest due to a decline in the average taxable equivalent yield of 31 bp as the duration in the investment portfolio continues to be shortened in order to reduce interest rate and market risk in the future. This is being undertaken primarily through the sale of long-term municipal bonds that have a maturity date of 2025 or later and securities with a call date within the next five years. To offset the revenue impact of the declining asset yields, a focus has been placed on increasing earning assets by adding quality short and intermediate term loans such as home equity loans, even though these new earning assets are at lower yields than legacy assets.

Interest and dividend income composition for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
March 31, 2015
 
Change
 
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
 
Loans including fees
 
$
10,355

 
88.31
%
 
$
9,323

 
81.80
%
 
$
1,032

 
11.07

%
Investment securities:
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
Taxable
 
622

 
5.30
 
 
1,014

 
8.90
 
 
(392
)
 
(38.66
)
 
Tax-exempt
 
475

 
4.05
 
 
767

 
6.73
 
 
(292
)
 
(38.07
)
 
Dividend and other interest income
 
274

 
2.34
 
 
293

 
2.57
 
 
(19
)
 
(6.48
)
 
Total interest and dividend income
 
$
11,726

 
100.00
%
 
$
11,397

 
100.00
%
 
$
329

 
2.89

%

Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 increased $66,000 to $1,352,000 compared to $1,286,000 for the same period of 2015.  The increase in interest expense is primarily associated with the lengthening of the time deposit portfolio as part of a strategy to build balance sheet protection in a rising rate environment, coupled with an increase in short term borrowing utilization.

Interest expense composition for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
March 31, 2015
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Deposits
 
$
834

 
61.69
%
 
$
743

 
57.77
%
 
$
91

 
12.25

%
Short-term borrowings
 
26

 
1.92
 
 
19

 
1.48
 
 
7

 
36.84

 
Long-term borrowings
 
492

 
36.39
 
 
524

 
40.75
 
 
(32
)
 
(6.11
)
 
Total interest expense
 
$
1,352

 
100.00
%
 
$
1,286

 
100.00
%
 
$
66

 
5.13

%
 
Net Interest Margin

The net interest margin (“NIM”) for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was 3.57% compared to 3.69% for the corresponding period of 2015.  The decline in the net interest margin was driven by a decreasing yield on the loan and investment portfolios due

30

Table of Contents


to the continued low rate environment. The impact of the declining earning asset yield and decreasing investment portfolio balance was partially offset by 12.35% growth in the balance of the average loan portfolio from March 31, 2015 to March 31, 2016 resulting in net interest income on a taxable equivalent basis increasing slightly compared to the comparable three month period of 2015. The primary funding for the loan growth was an increase in core deposits. These deposits represent a lower cost funding source than time deposits and comprise 79.22% of total deposits at March 31, 2016 compared to 78.33% at March 31, 2015. Limiting the positive impact on the net interest margin caused by the growth in core deposits was the lengthening of the time deposit portfolio coupled with additional FHLB long-term borrowings as part of our strategy to prepare the balance sheet for a rising rate environment.

The following is a schedule of average balances and associated yields for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

 
 
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
 
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
 
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
 
Average Balance
 
Interest
 
Average Rate
 
Average Balance
 
Interest
 
Average Rate
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Tax-exempt loans
 
$
54,014

 
$
535

 
3.98
%
 
$
36,183

 
$
383

 
4.30
%
All other loans
 
988,632

 
10,002

 
4.07
%
 
891,877

 
9,070

 
4.12
%
Total loans
 
1,042,646

 
10,537

 
4.06
%
 
928,060

 
9,453

 
4.13
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxable securities
 
99,032

 
885

 
3.57
%
 
143,421

 
1,303

 
3.63
%
Tax-exempt securities
 
63,373

 
720

 
4.54
%
 
87,825

 
1,162

 
5.29
%
Total securities
 
162,405

 
1,605

 
3.95
%
 
231,246

 
2,465

 
4.26
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
 
12,693

 
11

 
0.35
%
 
6,539

 
4

 
0.25
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total interest-earning assets
 
1,217,744

 
12,153

 
4.01
%
 
1,165,845

 
11,922

 
4.14
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other assets
 
96,462

 
 

 
 

 
96,043

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
$
1,314,206

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,261,888

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Savings
 
$
148,856

 
14

 
0.04
%
 
$
141,762

 
14

 
0.04
%
Super Now deposits
 
188,147

 
125

 
0.27
%
 
190,438

 
129

 
0.27
%
Money market deposits
 
219,240

 
139

 
0.25
%
 
205,243

 
136

 
0.27
%
Time deposits
 
220,554

 
556

 
1.01
%
 
216,775

 
464

 
0.87
%
Total interest-bearing deposits
 
776,797

 
834

 
0.43
%
 
754,218

 
743

 
0.40
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term borrowings
 
28,410

 
26

 
0.36
%
 
28,229

 
19

 
0.27
%
Long-term borrowings
 
91,025

 
492

 
2.14
%
 
84,009

 
524

 
2.50
%
Total borrowings
 
119,435

 
518

 
1.72
%
 
112,238

 
543

 
1.94
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
896,232

 
1,352

 
0.60
%
 
866,456

 
1,286

 
0.60
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand deposits
 
265,053

 
 

 
 

 
240,750

 
 

 
 

Other liabilities
 
15,406

 
 

 
 

 
17,145

 
 

 
 

Shareholders’ equity
 
137,515

 
 

 
 

 
137,537

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,314,206

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,261,888

 
 

 
 

Interest rate spread
 
 

 
 

 
3.41
%
 
 

 
 

 
3.54
%
Net interest income/margin
 
 

 
$
10,801

 
3.57
%
 
 

 
$
10,636

 
3.69
%

1.              Information on this table has been calculated using average daily balance sheets to obtain average balances.
2.              Non-accrual loans have been included with loans for the purpose of analyzing net interest earnings.
3.              Income and rates on a fully taxable equivalent basis include an adjustment for the difference between annual income from tax-exempt obligations and the taxable equivalent of such income at the standard 34% tax rate.
 

31

Table of Contents



The following table presents the adjustment to convert net interest income to net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.

 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
(In Thousands)
 
2016
 
2015
Total interest income
 
$
11,726

 
$
11,397

Total interest expense
 
1,352

 
1,286

Net interest income
 
10,374

 
10,111

Tax equivalent adjustment
 
427

 
525

Net interest income (fully taxable equivalent)
 
$
10,801

 
$
10,636

 
The following table sets forth the respective impact that both volume and rate changes have had on net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015:

 
 
Three Months Ended March 31,
 
 
2016 vs. 2015
 
 
Increase (Decrease) Due to
(In Thousands)
 
Volume
 
Rate
 
Net
Interest income:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Tax-exempt loans
 
$
334

 
$
(182
)
 
$
152

All other loans
 
1,640

 
(708
)
 
932

Taxable investment securities
 
(397
)
 
(21
)
 
(418
)
Tax-exempt investment securities
 
(293
)
 
(149
)
 
(442
)
Interest bearing deposits
 
5

 
2

 
7

Total interest-earning assets
 
1,289

 
(1,058
)
 
231

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Savings deposits
 

 

 

Super Now deposits
 
(4
)
 

 
(4
)
Money market deposits
 
41

 
(38
)
 
3

Time deposits
 

 
92

 
92

Short-term borrowings
 

 
7

 
7

Long-term borrowings
 
210

 
(242
)
 
(32
)
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
247

 
(181
)
 
66

Change in net interest income
 
$
1,042

 
$
(877
)
 
$
165

 
Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s quarterly review of the loan portfolio.  The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the markets served.  An external independent loan review is also performed annually for the Banks.  Management remains committed to an aggressive program of problem loan identification and resolution.

The allowance for loan losses is determined by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance has been determined.  Loss factors are based on management’s consideration of the nature of the portfolio segments, changes in mix and volume of the loan portfolio, and historical loan loss experience.  In addition, management considers industry standards and trends with respect to non-performing loans and its knowledge and experience with specific lending segments.

Although management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at March 31, 2016, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations.  A downturn in the local economy, increased unemployment, and delays in receiving financial information from borrowers could result in increased levels of nonperforming

32

Table of Contents


assets, charge-offs, loan loss provisions, and reductions in income.  Additionally, as an integral part of the examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the Banks' loan loss allowance.  The banking agencies could require the recognition of additions to the loan loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

When determining the appropriate allowance level, management has attributed the allowance for loan losses to various portfolio segments; however, the allowance is available for the entire portfolio as needed.

The allowance for loan losses increased from $12,044,000 at December 31, 2015 to $12,382,000 at March 31, 2016.  The increase in the allowance for loan losses was driven by an increase in total nonperforming loans. In addition the portfolio experienced minimal net charge-offs during the three months ended March 31, 2016 of $12,000.  The majority of the loans charged-off had a specific allowance within the allowance for losses.  At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.19% and 1.15%, respectively.

The provision for loan losses totaled $350,000 and $700,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015.  The amount of the provision for loan losses was primarily the result of loan growth.

Nonperforming loans increasing to $11,648,000 at March 31, 2016 from $11,157,000 at March 31, 2015 is primarily the result of a large commercial real estate loan that was placed on non-accrual status.  The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 1.12% and 1.18% at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, and the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans was 106.30% and 97.03% at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Internal loan review and analysis coupled with loan growth dictated a provision for loan losses of $350,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016.   

The following is a table showing total nonperforming loans as of:

 
Total Nonperforming Loans
(In Thousands)
90 Days Past Due

Non-accrual

Total
March 31, 2016
$
308

 
$
11,340

 
$
11,648

December 31, 2015
979

 
8,467

 
9,446

September 30, 2015
99

 
8,509

 
8,608

June 30, 2015
890

 
8,799

 
9,689

March 31, 2015
391

 
10,766

 
11,157

 
Non-interest Income

Total non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period in 2015 decreased $263,000 to $2,997,000.  Excluding net securities gains, non-interest income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 decreased $77,000 compared to the same period in 2015.  The increase in gain on sale of loans was driven by a shift in distribution channels and the hiring of additional mortgage loan officers over the past year.  The decrease in other non-interest income is the result of a gain on sale of other real-estate of $270,000 during 2015.



















33

Table of Contents


Non-interest income composition for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
March 31, 2015
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Service charges
 
$
532

 
17.75
%
 
$
553

 
16.96
%
 
$
(21
)
 
(3.80
)%
Net securities gains, available for sale
 
435

 
14.51

 
661

 
20.27

 
(226
)
 
(34.19
)
Net securities gains, trading
 
40

 
1.33

 

 

 
40

 
(100.00
)
Bank-owned life insurance
 
184

 
6.14

 
188

 
5.77

 
(4
)
 
(2.13
)
Gain on sale of loans
 
467

 
15.58

 
299

 
9.17

 
168

 
56.19

Insurance commissions
 
206

 
6.87

 
234

 
7.18

 
(28
)
 
(11.97
)
Brokerage commissions
 
255

 
8.51

 
245

 
7.52

 
10

 
4.08

Other
 
878

 
29.31

 
1,080

 
33.13

 
(202
)
 
(18.70
)
Total non-interest income
 
$
2,997

 
100.00
%
 
$
3,260

 
100.00
%
 
$
(263
)
 
(8.07
)%

Non-interest Expense

Total non-interest expense increased $593,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same period of 2015.  The increase in salaries and employee benefits is primarily attributable to increases in health insurance.  Furniture and equipment expenses increased primarily due to the construction and subsequent opening of a new branch in late 2015. Other expenses increased primarily due to increased expenses related to the debit card EMV (chip embedded card) conversion and system upgrades.

Non-interest expense composition for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 was as follows:
 
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
March 31, 2015
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Salaries and employee benefits
 
$
4,580

 
50.55
%
 
$
4,470

 
52.79
%
 
$
110

 
2.46
 %
Occupancy
 
541

 
5.97

 
628

 
7.42

 
(87
)
 
(13.85
)
Furniture and equipment
 
701

 
7.74

 
595

 
7.03

 
106

 
17.82

Pennsylvania shares tax
 
258

 
2.85

 
224

 
2.64

 
34

 
15.18

Amortization of investment in limited partnerships
 
152

 
1.68

 
165

 
1.95

 
(13
)
 
(7.88
)
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance
 
232

 
2.56

 
215

 
2.54

 
17

 
7.91

Marketing
 
210

 
2.32

 
129

 
1.52

 
81

 
62.79

Intangible amortization
 
87

 
0.96

 
82

 
0.97

 
5

 
6.10

Other
 
2,300

 
25.37

 
1,960

 
23.14

 
340

 
17.35

Total non-interest expense
 
$
9,061

 
100.00
%
 
$
8,468

 
100.00
%
 
$
593

 
7.00
 %

Provision for Income Taxes

Income taxes decreased $34,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to the same periods of 2015.  The primary cause of the increase in tax expense for the three months ended March 31, 2016 compared to 2015 is the impact of a reduction of $292,000 in tax-exempt interest income within the investment portfolio. Excluding the impact of the net securities gains, the effective tax rate for the three months ended March 31, 2016 was 20.67% compared to 17.60% for the same period of 2015.  The Company currently is in a deferred tax asset position due to the low income housing tax credits earned both currently and previously.  Management has reviewed the deferred tax asset and has determined that the asset will be utilized within the appropriate carry forward period and therefore does not require a valuation allowance.





34

Table of Contents





ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents increased $24,329,000 from $22,796,000 at December 31, 2015 to $47,125,000 at March 31, 2016 primarily as a result of the following activities during the three months ended March 31, 2016:

Loans Held for Sale

Activity regarding loans held for sale resulted in originations trailing sales proceeds, less $467,000 in realized gains, by $243,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016.

Loans

Gross loans decreased $3,955,000 since December 31, 2015 due to a decrease in commercial, financial, and agricultural loans. 

The allocation of the loan portfolio, by category, as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 is presented below:
 
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
152,891

 
14.68
 %
 
$
164,072

 
15.70
 %
 
$
(11,181
)
 
(6.81
)%
Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
531,424

 
51.05

 
526,183

 
50.34

 
5,241

 
1.00
 %
Commercial
 
306,259

 
29.41

 
302,539

 
28.95

 
3,720

 
1.23
 %
Construction
 
25,389

 
2.44

 
26,824

 
2.57

 
(1,435
)
 
(5.35
)%
Installment loans to individuals
 
26,702

 
2.56

 
27,001

 
2.58

 
(299
)
 
(1.11
)%
Net deferred loan fees and discounts
 
(1,413
)
 
(0.14
)
 
(1,412
)
 
(0.14
)
 
(1
)
 
0.07
 %
Gross loans
 
$
1,041,252

 
100.00
 %
 
$
1,045,207

 
100.00
 %
 
$
(3,955
)
 
(0.38
)%
 
The following table shows the amount of accrual and non-accrual TDRs at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015:
 
 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
 
Accrual
 
Non-accrual
 
Total
 
Accrual
 
Non-accrual
 
Total
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
304

 
$
145

 
$
449

 
$
320

 
$
149

 
$
469

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,410

 
350

 
1,760

 
1,428

 
353

 
1,781

Commercial
 
5,031

 
2,263

 
7,294

 
5,085

 
2,312

 
7,397

 
 
$
6,745

 
$
2,758

 
$
9,503

 
$
6,833

 
$
2,814

 
$
9,647

 
Investments

The fair value of the investment securities portfolio at March 31, 2016 decreased $22,461,000 since December 31, 2015 while the amortized cost of the portfolio decreased $24,081,000.  The decrease in value is the result of the investment portfolio being actively managed in order to reduce interest rate and market risk. This is being undertaken primarily through the sale of long-term municipal bonds that have a maturity date of 2025 or later and securities with a call date within the next five years.  The proceeds of the bond sales are being deployed into loans and intermediate term corporate bonds and short and intermediate term municipal bonds.  The strategy to sell a portion of the long-term bond portfolio does negatively impact current earnings, but this action plays a key role in our long-term asset liability management strategy as the balance sheet is shortened to better prepare for a rising rate environment. The unrealized losses within the debt securities portfolio are the result of market activity, not credit issues/ratings, as approximately 89% of the debt securities portfolio on an amortized cost basis is currently rated A or higher by either S&P or Moody’s.

35

Table of Contents



The Company considers various factors, which include examples from applicable accounting guidance, when analyzing the available for sale portfolio for possible other than temporary impairment.  The Company primarily considers the following factors in its analysis: length of time and severity of the fair value being less than carrying value; reduction of dividend paid (equities); continued payment of dividend/interest, credit rating, and financial condition of an issuer; intent and ability to hold until anticipated recovery (which may be maturity); and general outlook for the economy, specific industry, and entity in question.

The bond portion of the portfolio review is conducted with emphases on several factors.  Continued payment of principal and interest is given primary importance with credit rating and financial condition of the issuer following as the next most important.  Credit ratings were reviewed with the ratings of the bonds being satisfactory.  Bonds that were not currently rated were discussed with a third party and/or underwent an internal financial review.  The Company also monitors whether each of the investments incurred a decline in fair value from carrying value of at least 20% for twelve consecutive months or a similar decline of at least 50% for three consecutive months.  Each bond is reviewed to determine whether it is a general obligation bond, which is backed by the credit and taxing power of the issuing jurisdiction, or revenue bond, which is only payable from specified revenues.  Based on the review undertaken by the Company, the Company determined that the decline in value of the various bond holdings were temporary and were the result of the general market downturns and interest rate/yield curve changes, not credit issues.  The fact that almost all of such bonds are general obligation bonds further solidified the Company’s determination that the decline in the value of these bond holdings is temporary.

The fair value of the equity portfolio continues to fluctuate as the economic turbulence continues to impact stock pricing.  The amortized cost of the available for sale equity securities portfolio has decreased $4,286,000 to $11,325,000 at March 31, 2016 from $15,611,000 at December 31, 2015 while the fair value decreased $4,433,000 over the same time period.

The equity portion of the portfolio is reviewed for possible other than temporary impairment in a similar manner to the bond portfolio with greater emphasis placed on the length of time the fair value has been less than the carrying value and financial sector outlook.  The Company also reviews dividend payment activities.  The starting point for the equity analysis is the length and severity of a market price decline.  The Company monitors two primary measures: 20% decline in fair value from carrying value for twelve consecutive months and 50% decline for three consecutive months.

The distribution of credit ratings by amortized cost and fair values for the debt security portfolio at March 31, 2016 follows:
 
 
 
A- to AAA
 
B- to BBB+
 
Not Rated
 
Total
(In Thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
Available for sale (AFS)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$
3,474

 
$
3,476

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
3,474

 
$
3,476

Mortgage-backed securities
 
9,465

 
9,751

 

 

 

 

 
9,465

 
9,751

Asset-backed securities
 
1,826

 
1,793

 

 

 

 

 
1,826

 
1,793

State and political securities
 
65,810

 
67,811

 

 

 
2,723

 
2,764

 
68,533

 
70,575

Other debt securities
 
48,406

 
48,178

 
8,674

 
8,037

 

 

 
57,080

 
56,215

Total debt securities AFS
 
$
128,981

 
$
131,009

 
$
8,674

 
$
8,037

 
$
2,723

 
$
2,764

 
$
140,378

 
$
141,810

 
Financing Activities

Deposits

Total deposits increased $27,701,000 from December 31, 2015 to March 31, 2016.  The growth was led by an increase in NOW deposit accounts from December 31, 2015 to March 31, 2016 of 8.00%.  The increase in core deposits (deposits less time deposits) has provided relationship driven funding for the loan and investment portfolios.  The increase in deposits is the result of our focus on building relationships, not by offering market leading rates. 







36

Table of Contents





Deposit balances and their changes for the periods being discussed follow:

 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Demand deposits
 
$
269,362

 
25.42
%
 
$
280,083

 
27.15
%
 
$
(10,721
)
 
(3.83
)%
NOW accounts
 
190,168

 
17.95

 
176,078

 
17.06

 
14,090

 
8.00

Money market deposits
 
226,659

 
21.39

 
209,782

 
20.33

 
16,877

 
8.05

Savings deposits
 
153,217

 
14.46

 
144,561

 
14.01

 
8,656

 
5.99

Time deposits
 
220,175

 
20.78

 
221,376

 
21.45

 
(1,201
)
 
(0.54
)
 
 
$
1,059,581

 
100.00
%
 
$
1,031,880

 
100.00
%
 
$
27,701

 
2.68
 %
 
Borrowed Funds

Total borrowed funds decreased 22.35% or $30,764,000 to $106,899,000 at March 31, 2016 compared to $137,663,000 at December 31, 2015.  Short-term and long-term borrowings primarily decreased due to growth in deposits.

 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Short-term borrowings:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

FHLB repurchase agreements
 
$

 
%
 
$
28,304

 
20.56
%
 
$
(28,304
)
 
(100.00
)%
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
 
15,874

 
14.85

 
18,334

 
13.32

 
(2,460
)
 
(13.42
)
Total short-term borrowings
 
15,874

 
14.85

 
46,638

 
33.88

 
(30,764
)
 
(65.96
)
Long-term borrowings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term FHLB borrowings
 
90,625

 
84.78

 
90,625

 
65.83

 

 

Long-term capital lease
 
400

 
0.37

 
400

 
0.29

 

 

Total long-term borrowings
 
91,025

 
85.15

 
91,025

 
66.12

 

 
 %
Total borrowed funds
 
$
106,899

 
100.00
%
 
$
137,663

 
100.00
%
 
$
(30,764
)
 
(22.35
)%

Capital

The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed on an ongoing basis with reference to the size, composition, and quality of the Company’s resources and regulatory guidelines.  Management seeks to maintain a level of capital sufficient to support existing assets and anticipated asset growth, maintain favorable access to capital markets, and preserve high quality credit ratings.

Bank holding companies are required to comply with the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines.  The risk-based capital rules are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets.  Specifically, each is required to maintain certain minimum dollar amounts and ratios of common equity tier I risk-based, tier I risk-based, total risk-based, and tier I leverage capital. In addition to the capital requirements, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvements Act (FDICIA) established five capital categories ranging from “well capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized.” To be classified as “well capitalized”, common equity tier I risk-based, tier I risked-based, total risk-based, and tier I leverage capital ratios must be at least 6.5%, 8%, 10%, and 5%, respectively.










37

Table of Contents





The Company's capital ratios as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:

 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
121,772

 
11.26
%
 
$
121,665

 
11.24
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
48,666

 
4.50

 
48,722

 
4.50

To Be Well Capitalized
 
70,295

 
6.50

 
70,377

 
6.50

Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
121,772

 
11.26
%
 
$
121,665

 
11.24
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
64,887

 
6.00

 
64,963

 
6.00

To Be Well Capitalized
 
86,517

 
8.00

 
86,617

 
8.00

Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
126,199

 
11.67
%
 
$
134,067

 
12.38
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
86,512

 
8.00

 
86,617

 
8.00

To Be Well Capitalized
 
108,140

 
10.00

 
108,272

 
10.00

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
121,772

 
9.40
%
 
$
121,665

 
9.38
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
51,818

 
4.00

 
51,862

 
4.00

To Be Well Capitalized
 
64,772

 
5.00

 
64,828

 
5.00

 
Jersey Shore State Bank's capital ratios as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:

 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
83,113

 
10.79
%
 
$
82,682

 
10.70
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
34,663

 
4.50

 
34,773

 
4.50

To Be Well Capitalized
 
50,068

 
6.50

 
50,227

 
6.50

Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
83,113

 
10.79
%
 
$
82,682

 
10.70
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
46,217

 
6.00

 
46,363

 
6.00

To Be Well Capitalized
 
61,622

 
8.00

 
61,818

 
8.00

Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
-

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
84,973

 
11.03
%
 
$
92,036

 
11.91
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
61,630

 
8.00

 
61,818

 
8.00

To Be Well Capitalized
 
77,038

 
10.00

 
77,272

 
10.00

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
83,113

 
8.69
%
 
$
82,682

 
8.66
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
38,269

 
4.00

 
38,175

 
4.00

To Be Well Capitalized
 
47,836

 
5.00

 
47,719

 
5.00










38

Table of Contents







Luzerne Bank's capital ratios as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows:

 
 
March 31, 2016
 
December 31, 2015
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
30,382

 
9.83
%
 
$
30,549

 
10.66
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
13,908

 
4.50

 
12,901

 
4.50

To Be Well Capitalized
 
20,090

 
6.50

 
18,635

 
6.50

Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
30,382

 
9.80
%
 
$
30,549

 
10.66
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
18,601

 
6.00

 
17,201

 
6.00

To Be Well Capitalized
 
24,802

 
8.00

 
22,935

 
8.00

Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
32,696

 
10.58
%
 
$
33,274

 
11.61
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
24,723

 
8.00

 
22,935

 
8.00

To Be Well Capitalized
 
30,904

 
10.00

 
28,669

 
10.00

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
30,382

 
8.87
%
 
$
30,549

 
8.90
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
13,701

 
4.00

 
13,725

 
4.00

To Be Well Capitalized
 
17,126

 
5.00

 
17,157

 
5.00


In July 2013, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted revisions to the agencies’ capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules, which were designed to enhance such requirements and implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly referred to as Basel III.  The July 2013 final rules generally implement higher minimum capital requirements, add a new common equity tier 1 capital requirement, and establish criteria that instruments must meet to be considered common equity tier 1 capital, additional tier 1 capital or tier 2 capital.  The new minimum capital to risk-adjusted assets requirements are a common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% (6.5% to be considered “well capitalized”) and a tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, increased from 4.0% (and increased from 6.0% to 8.0% to be considered “well capitalized”); the total capital ratio remains at 8.0% under the new rules (10.0% to be considered “well capitalized”).  Under the new rules, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets.  The new minimum capital requirements were effective beginning on January 1, 2015.  The capital contribution buffer requirements phase in over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2016. The Company and the Banks will continue to analyze these new rules and their effects on the business, operations and capital levels of the Company and the Banks.

Liquidity; Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk

The asset/liability committee addresses the liquidity needs of the Company to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet credit demands and deposit withdrawals as well as to the placement of available funds in the investment portfolio.  In assessing liquidity requirements, equal consideration is given to the current position as well as the future outlook.

The following liquidity measures are monitored for compliance and were within the limits cited at March 31, 2016:

1.            Net Loans to Total Assets, 85% maximum
2.              Net Loans to Total Deposits, 100% maximum
3.              Cumulative 90 day Maturity GAP %, +/- 20% maximum
4.              Cumulative 1 Year Maturity GAP %, +/- 25% maximum


39

Table of Contents


Fundamental objectives of the Company’s asset/liability management process are to maintain adequate liquidity while minimizing interest rate risk.  The maintenance of adequate liquidity provides the Company with the ability to meet its financial obligations to depositors, loan customers, and shareholders.  Additionally, it provides funds for normal operating expenditures and business opportunities as they arise.  The objective of interest rate sensitivity management is to increase net interest income by managing interest sensitive assets and liabilities in such a way that they can be repriced in response to changes in market interest rates.

The Banks, like other financial institutions, must have sufficient funds available to meet liquidity needs for deposit withdrawals, loan commitments and originations, and expenses.  In order to control cash flow, the Banks estimate future cash flows from deposits, loan payments, and investment security payments.  The primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities, FHLB borrowings, and brokered deposits.  Management believes the Banks have adequate resources to meet their normal funding requirements.

Management monitors the Company’s liquidity on both a long and short-term basis, thereby providing management necessary information to react to current balance sheet trends.  Cash flow needs are assessed and sources of funds are determined.  Funding strategies consider both customer needs and economical cost.  Both short and long-term funding needs are addressed by maturities and sales of available for sale and trading investment securities, loan repayments and maturities, and liquidating money market investments such as federal funds sold.  The use of these resources, in conjunction with access to credit provides core funding to satisfy depositor, borrower, and creditor needs.

Management monitors and determines the desirable level of liquidity.  Consideration is given to loan demand, investment opportunities, deposit pricing and growth potential, as well as the current cost of borrowing funds.  The Company has a total current maximum borrowing capacity at the FHLB of $521,413,000.  In addition to this credit arrangement, the Company has additional lines of credit with correspondent banks of $35,366,000.  Management believes it has sufficient liquidity to satisfy estimated short-term and long-term funding needs.  FHLB borrowings totaled $90,625,000 as of March 31, 2016.

Interest rate sensitivity, which is closely related to liquidity management, is a function of the repricing characteristics of the Company’s portfolio of assets and liabilities.  Asset/liability management strives to match maturities and rates between loan and investment security assets with the deposit liabilities and borrowings that fund them.  Successful asset/liability management results in a balance sheet structure which can cope effectively with market rate fluctuations. The matching process by segments both assets and liabilities into future time periods (usually 12 months, or less) based upon when repricing can be effected.  Repriceable assets are subtracted from repriceable liabilities, for a specific time period to determine the “gap”, or difference. Once known, the gap is managed based on predictions about future market interest rates.  Intentional mismatching, or gapping, can enhance net interest income if market rates move as predicted.  However, if market rates behave in a manner contrary to predictions, net interest income will suffer.  Gaps, therefore, contain an element of risk and must be prudently managed.  In addition to gap management, the Company has an asset/liability management policy which incorporates a market value at risk calculation which is used to determine the effects of interest rate movements on shareholders’ equity and a simulation analysis to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet.

The Company currently maintains a GAP position of being asset sensitive.  The Company has strategically taken this position as it has decreased the duration of the earning asset portfolio by adding quality short and intermediate term loans such as home equity loans and the selling of long-term municipal bonds.  Lengthening of the liability portfolio is being undertaken to build protection in a rising rate environment.

A market value at risk calculation is utilized to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet and more specifically shareholders’ equity.  The Company does not manage the balance sheet structure in order to maintain compliance with this calculation.  The calculation serves as a guideline with greater emphases placed on interest rate sensitivity.  Changes to calculation results from period to period are reviewed as changes in results could be a signal of future events.  As of the most recent analysis, the results of the market value at risk calculation were within established guidelines due to the strategic direction being taken.

Interest Rate Sensitivity

In this analysis the Company examines the result of a 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis point change in market interest rates and the effect on net interest income. It is assumed that the change is instantaneous and that all rates move in a parallel manner.  Assumptions are also made concerning prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage securities.





40

Table of Contents




The following is a rate shock forecast for the twelve month period ending March 31, 2017 assuming a static balance sheet as of March 31, 2016.

 
 
Parallel Rate Shock in Basis Points
(In Thousands)
 
-200
 
-100
 
Static
 
+100
 
+200
 
+300
 
+400
Net interest income
 
$
34,892

 
$
37,519

 
$
40,386

 
$
42,847

 
$
45,222

 
$
47,249

 
$
48,789

Change from static
 
(5,494
)
 
(2,867
)
 

 
2,461

 
4,836

 
6,863

 
8,403

Percent change from static
 
-13.60
 %
 
-7.10
 %
 

 
6.09
%
 
11.97
%
 
16.99
%
 
20.81
%
 
The model utilized to create the report presented above makes various estimates at each level of interest rate change regarding cash flow from principal repayment on loans and mortgage-backed securities and/or call activity on investment securities.  Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates which would result in significant differences in the calculated projected change.  In addition, the limits stated above do not necessarily represent the level of change under which management would undertake specific measures to realign its portfolio in order to reduce the projected level of change.  Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond expeditiously when the market interest rate outlook changes.

Inflation

The asset and liability structure of a financial institution is primarily monetary in nature.  Therefore, interest rates rather than inflation have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance.  Interest rates are not always affected in the same direction or magnitude as prices of other goods and services, but are reflective of fiscal policy initiatives or economic factors which are not measured by a price index.
 
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk for the Company is comprised primarily of interest rate risk exposure and liquidity risk.  Interest rate risk and liquidity risk management is performed at both the level of the Company and the Banks.  The Company’s interest rate sensitivity is monitored by management through selected interest rate risk measures produced by an independent third party.  There have been no substantial changes in the Company’s gap analysis or simulation analysis compared to the information provided in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2015.  Additional information and details are provided in the “Liquidity, Interest Rate Sensitivity, and Market Risk” section of “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond in a timely manner when the market interest rate outlook changes.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An analysis was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of March 31, 2016.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended March 31, 2016, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

41

Table of Contents


Part II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.                           Legal Proceedings
 
None.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors
 
There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015.  Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s business.

Item 2.                           Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides certain information with respect to the Company's repurchase of common stock during the quarter ended March 31, 2016.
Period
 
Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units) Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or Units) Purchased
 
Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value)
of Shares (or Units) that
May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Month #1 (January 1 - January 31, 2016)
 

 
$

 

 
404,744

Month #2 (February 1 - February 29, 2016)
 
9,363

 
39.56

 
9,363

 
395,381

Month #3 (March 1 - March 31, 2016)
 
5,237

 
38.91

 
5,237

 
390,144

 
On April 25, 2016, the Board of Directors extended the previously approved authorization to repurchase up to 482,000 shares, or approximately 10%, of the outstanding shares of the Company for an additional year to April 30, 2017.  As of March 31, 2016 there have been 91,856 shares repurchased under this plan.

Item 3.                           Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
None.
 
Item 4.                           Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Not applicable.
 
Item 5.                           Other Information
 
None.
 




















42

Table of Contents


Item 6.                           Exhibits
 
3(i)
 
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012).
3(ii)
 
Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
31(i)
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
31(ii)
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
32(i)
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
32(ii)
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
101
 
Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015; (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

43

Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
Date:    
May 10, 2016
/s/ Richard A. Grafmyre
 
 
Richard A. Grafmyre, President and Chief Executive Officer
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
May 10, 2016
/s/ Brian L. Knepp
 
 
Brian L. Knepp, Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
 
 
Officer)

44

Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit 31(i)
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31(ii)
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(i)
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32(ii)
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 101
 
Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015; (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.


45