Annual Statements Open main menu

PENNS WOODS BANCORP INC - Quarter Report: 2017 September (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents


UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.  20549

FORM 10-Q
 
ý
Quarterly Report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

for the Quarterly Period Ended September 30, 2017. 
o
Transition report pursuant to Section 13 or 15 (d) of the Exchange Act

For the Transition Period from                    to                   .

No. 0-17077
(Commission File Number)

PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
(Exact name of Registrant as specified in its charter) 
PENNSYLVANIA
 
23-2226454
(State or other jurisdiction of
 
(I.R.S. Employer
incorporation or organization)
 
Identification No.)
 
300 Market Street, P.O. Box 967 Williamsport, Pennsylvania
 
17703-0967
(Address of principal executive offices)
 
(Zip Code)
 

(570) 322-1111
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.  YES ý NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).  YES ý NO o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company.  See the definition of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer”, “smaller reporting company” and "emerging growth company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.  (Check one):

 
Large accelerated filer o
 
                 Accelerated filer x
  Non-accelerated filer o
 
   Small reporting company o
 
 
Emerging growth company o

If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. o

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).  YES o NO ý

On November 1, 2017 there were 4,688,739 shares of the Registrant’s common stock outstanding.


Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.

INDEX TO QUARTERLY REPORT ON FORM 10-Q

 
 
Page
 
 
Number
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

2

Table of Contents


Part I.  FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.  Financial Statements
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEET
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
September 30,
 
December 31,
(In Thousands, Except Share Data)
 
2017
 
2016
ASSETS:
 
 

 
 

Noninterest-bearing balances
 
$
22,042

 
$
26,766

Interest-bearing balances in other financial institutions
 
5,705

 
16,905

Total cash and cash equivalents
 
27,747

 
43,671

 
 
 
 
 
Investment securities, available for sale, at fair value
 
132,313

 
133,492

Investment securities, trading
 
210

 
58

Loans held for sale
 
1,734

 
1,953

Loans
 
1,189,714

 
1,093,681

Allowance for loan losses
 
(12,933
)
 
(12,896
)
Loans, net
 
1,176,781

 
1,080,785

Premises and equipment, net
 
25,895

 
24,275

Accrued interest receivable
 
4,289

 
3,672

Bank-owned life insurance
 
27,827

 
27,332

Goodwill
 
17,104

 
17,104

Intangibles
 
1,543

 
1,799

Deferred tax asset
 
7,984

 
8,397

Other assets
 
6,770

 
6,052

TOTAL ASSETS
 
$
1,430,197

 
$
1,348,590

 
 
 
 
 
LIABILITIES:
 
 

 
 

Interest-bearing deposits
 
$
843,166

 
$
791,937

Noninterest-bearing deposits
 
310,830

 
303,277

Total deposits
 
1,153,996

 
1,095,214

 
 
 
 
 
Short-term borrowings
 
41,596

 
13,241

Long-term borrowings
 
80,998

 
85,998

Accrued interest payable
 
483

 
455

Other liabilities
 
13,455

 
15,433

TOTAL LIABILITIES
 
1,290,528

 
1,210,341

 
 
 
 
 
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY:
 
 

 
 

Preferred stock, no par value, 3,000,000 shares authorized; no shares issued
 

 

Common stock, par value $8.33, 15,000,000 shares authorized; 5,008,720 and 5,007,109 shares issued; 4,688,570 and 4,734,657 outstanding
 
41,739

 
41,726

Additional paid-in capital
 
50,142

 
50,075

Retained earnings
 
64,033

 
61,610

Accumulated other comprehensive loss:
 
 

 
 

Net unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities
 
73

 
(639
)
Defined benefit plan
 
(4,203
)
 
(4,289
)
Treasury stock at cost, 320,150 and 272,452 shares
 
(12,115
)
 
(10,234
)
TOTAL SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
139,669

 
138,249

TOTAL LIABILITIES AND SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
 
$
1,430,197

 
$
1,348,590

 
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Loans, including fees
 
$
11,906

 
$
10,541

 
$
33,642

 
$
31,362

Investment securities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Taxable
 
553

 
601

 
1,665

 
1,825

Tax-exempt
 
319

 
329

 
940

 
1,203

Dividend and other interest income
 
170

 
189

 
592

 
666

TOTAL INTEREST AND DIVIDEND INCOME
 
12,948

 
11,660

 
36,839

 
35,056

INTEREST EXPENSE:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Deposits
 
1,058

 
909

 
2,968

 
2,624

Short-term borrowings
 
31

 
7

 
39

 
41

Long-term borrowings
 
407

 
497

 
1,220

 
1,481

TOTAL INTEREST EXPENSE
 
1,496

 
1,413

 
4,227

 
4,146

NET INTEREST INCOME
 
11,452

 
10,247

 
32,612

 
30,910

PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
 
60

 
258

 
605

 
866

NET INTEREST INCOME AFTER PROVISION FOR LOAN LOSSES
 
11,392

 
9,989

 
32,007

 
30,044

NON-INTEREST INCOME:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Service charges
 
550

 
585

 
1,637

 
1,678

Net securities gains, available for sale
 
302

 
253

 
487

 
1,174

Net securities (losses) gains, trading
 
(4
)
 
8

 
(2
)
 
54

Bank-owned life insurance
 
166

 
172

 
499

 
516

Gain on sale of loans
 
455

 
658

 
1,316

 
1,691

Insurance commissions
 
109

 
198

 
399

 
604

Brokerage commissions
 
352

 
290

 
1,044

 
817

Debit card fees
 
514

 
690

 
1,450

 
1,413

Other
 
296

 
228

 
1,325

 
1,310

TOTAL NON-INTEREST INCOME
 
2,740

 
3,082

 
8,155

 
9,257

NON-INTEREST EXPENSE:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Salaries and employee benefits
 
4,738

 
4,507

 
14,116

 
13,433

Occupancy
 
603

 
544

 
1,855

 
1,630

Furniture and equipment
 
816

 
662

 
2,129

 
2,042

Software amortization
 
235

 
580

 
750

 
950

Pennsylvania shares tax
 
228

 
220

 
696

 
698

Professional fees
 
560

 
502

 
1,816

 
1,512

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance
 
194

 
202

 
514

 
670

Debit card expenses
 
168

 
246

 
478

 
456

Marketing
 
315

 
173

 
690

 
568

Intangible amortization
 
81

 
90

 
256

 
276

Other
 
1,628

 
1,013

 
4,314

 
4,230

TOTAL NON-INTEREST EXPENSE
 
9,566

 
8,739

 
27,614

 
26,465

INCOME BEFORE INCOME TAX PROVISION
 
4,566

 
4,332

 
12,548

 
12,836

INCOME TAX PROVISION
 
1,282

 
1,273

 
3,491

 
3,307

NET INCOME
 
$
3,284

 
$
3,059

 
$
9,057

 
$
9,529

EARNINGS PER SHARE - BASIC AND DILUTED
 
$
0.70

 
$
0.65

 
$
1.92

 
$
2.01

WEIGHTED AVERAGE SHARES OUTSTANDING - BASIC AND DILUTED
 
4,688,222

 
4,733,800

 
4,711,282

 
4,735,844

DIVIDENDS DECLARED PER SHARE
 
$
0.47

 
$
0.47

 
$
1.41

 
$
1.41


See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents




PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In Thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Net Income
 
$
3,284

 
$
3,059

 
$
9,057

 
$
9,529

Other comprehensive income (loss):
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale securities
 
437

 
(276
)
 
1,565

 
3,039

Tax effect
 
(150
)
 
94

 
(532
)
 
(1,032
)
Net realized gain on available for sale securities included in net income
 
(302
)
 
(253
)
 
(487
)
 
(1,174
)
Tax effect
 
104

 
86

 
166

 
398

   Amortization of unrecognized pension loss
 
45

 
39

 
129

 
117

        Tax effect
 
(15
)
 
(13
)
 
(43
)
 
(40
)
Total other comprehensive income (loss)
 
119

 
(323
)
 
798

 
1,308

Comprehensive income
 
$
3,403

 
$
2,736

 
$
9,855

 
$
10,837

 
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(UNAUDITED)
 
 
 
COMMON STOCK
 
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN CAPITAL
 
RETAINED EARNINGS
 
ACCUMULATED OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
 
TREASURY STOCK
 
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
SHARES
 
AMOUNT
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2015
 
5,004,984

 
$
41,708

 
$
49,992

 
$
58,038

 
$
(3,799
)
 
$
(9,660
)
 
$
136,279

Net income
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
9,529

 
 

 
 

 
9,529

Other comprehensive income
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
1,308

 
 

 
1,308

Dividends declared, ($1.41 per share)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(6,678
)
 
 

 
 

 
(6,678
)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan
 
1,617

 
13

 
58

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
71

Purchase of treasury stock (14,600 shares)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(574
)
 
(574
)
Balance, September 30, 2016
 
5,006,601

 
$
41,721

 
$
50,050

 
$
60,889

 
$
(2,491
)
 
$
(10,234
)
 
$
139,935


 
 
COMMON STOCK
 
ADDITIONAL
PAID-IN CAPITAL
 
RETAINED EARNINGS
 
ACCUMULATED OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
 
TREASURY STOCK
 
TOTAL
SHAREHOLDERS’ EQUITY
(In Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
SHARES
 
AMOUNT
 
 
 
 
 
Balance, December 31, 2016
 
5,007,109

 
$
41,726

 
$
50,075

 
$
61,610

 
$
(4,928
)
 
$
(10,234
)
 
$
138,249

Net income
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
9,057

 
 

 
 

 
9,057

Other comprehensive income
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
798

 
 

 
798

Dividends declared, ($1.41 per share)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(6,634
)
 
 

 
 

 
(6,634
)
Common shares issued for employee stock purchase plan
 
1,611

 
13

 
67

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
80

Purchase of treasury stock (47,698 shares)
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
(1,881
)
 
(1,881
)
Balance, September 30, 2017
 
5,008,720

 
$
41,739

 
$
50,142

 
$
64,033

 
$
(4,130
)
 
$
(12,115
)
 
$
139,669

 
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

6

Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CASH FLOWS
(UNAUDITED) 
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In Thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
 
 

 
 

Net Income
 
$
9,057

 
$
9,529

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities:
 
 

 
 

Depreciation and amortization
 
1,979

 
2,394

Amortization of intangible assets
 
256

 
276

Provision for loan losses
 
605

 
866

Accretion and amortization of investment security discounts and premiums
 
688

 
657

Net securities gains, available for sale
 
(487
)
 
(1,174
)
Originations of loans held for sale
 
(41,503
)
 
(50,824
)
Proceeds of loans held for sale
 
43,038

 
51,112

Gain on sale of loans
 
(1,316
)
 
(1,691
)
Net securities gains, trading
 
2

 
(54
)
Proceeds from the sale of trading securities
 
332

 
3,723

Purchases of trading securities
 
(486
)
 
(3,596
)
Earnings on bank-owned life insurance
 
(499
)
 
(516
)
Decrease in deferred tax asset
 
46

 
952

Other, net
 
(4,361
)
 
508

Net cash provided by operating activities
 
7,351

 
12,162

INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
 
 

 
 

Proceeds from sales of available for sale securities
 
15,443

 
42,180

Proceeds from calls and maturities of available for sale securities
 
7,198

 
19,267

Purchases of available for sale securities
 
(18,434
)
 
(24,040
)
Net increase in loans
 
(97,109
)
 
(24,548
)
Acquisition of premises and equipment
 
(2,849
)
 
(2,347
)
Proceeds from the sale of foreclosed assets
 
958

 
486

Purchase of bank-owned life insurance
 
(34
)
 
(27
)
Proceeds from redemption of regulatory stock
 
4,844

 
2,644

Purchases of regulatory stock
 
(6,994
)
 
(2,569
)
Net cash (used for) provided by investing activities
 
(96,977
)
 
11,046

FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
 
 

 
 

Net increase in interest-bearing deposits
 
51,229

 
40,901

Net increase in noninterest-bearing deposits
 
7,553

 
15,516

Proceeds from long-term borrowings
 
30,000

 

Repayment of long-term borrowings
 
(35,000
)
 

Net increase (decrease) in short-term borrowings
 
28,355

 
(35,059
)
Dividends paid
 
(6,634
)
 
(6,678
)
Issuance of common stock
 
80

 
71

Purchases of treasury stock
 
(1,881
)
 
(574
)
Net cash provided by financing activities
 
73,702

 
14,177

NET (DECREASE) INCREASE IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
 
(15,924
)
 
37,385

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, BEGINNING
 
43,671

 
22,796

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS, ENDING
 
$
27,747

 
$
60,181

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
 
 

 
 

Interest paid
 
$
4,199

 
$
4,091

Income taxes paid
 
3,950

 
3,050

Transfer of loans to foreclosed real estate
 
508

 
83

 
See accompanying notes to the unaudited consolidated financial statements.

7

Table of Contents


PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
 
Note 1.  Basis of Presentation
 
The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. (the “Company”) and its wholly-owned subsidiaries: Woods Investment Company, Inc., Woods Real Estate Development Company, Inc., Luzerne Bank, and Jersey Shore State Bank (Jersey Shore State Bank and Luzerne Bank are referred to together as the “Banks”) and Jersey Shore State Bank’s wholly-owned subsidiary, The M Group, Inc. D/B/A The Comprehensive Financial Group (“The M Group”).  All significant inter-company balances and transactions have been eliminated in the consolidation.

The interim financial statements are unaudited, but in the opinion of management reflect all adjustments necessary for the fair presentation of results for such periods.  The results of operations for any interim period are not necessarily indicative of results for the full year.  These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The accounting policies followed in the presentation of interim financial results are the same as those followed on an annual basis.  These policies are presented on pages 39 through 48 of the Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

In reference to the attached financial statements, all adjustments are of a normal recurring nature pursuant to Rule 10-01(b) (8) of Regulation S-X.
 
Note 2.  Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss

The changes in accumulated other comprehensive loss by component shown net of tax and parenthesis indicating debits, as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Net Unrealized Loss
on Available
for Sale Securities
 
Defined
Benefit 
Plan
 
Total
 
Net Unrealized Gain
on Available
for Sale Securities
 
Defined
Benefit 
Plan
 
Total
Beginning balance
 
$
(16
)
 
$
(4,233
)

$
(4,249
)
 
$
1,838

 
$
(4,006
)
 
$
(2,168
)
Other comprehensive income (loss) before reclassifications
 
287




287

 
(182
)
 

 
(182
)
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(198
)

30


(168
)
 
(167
)
 
26

 
(141
)
Net current-period other comprehensive income
 
89


30


119

 
(349
)
 
26

 
(323
)
Ending balance
 
$
73


$
(4,203
)

$
(4,130
)
 
$
1,489

 
$
(3,980
)
 
$
(2,491
)
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Net Unrealized Loss
on Available
for Sale Securities
 
Defined
Benefit 
Plan
 
Total
 
Net Unrealized Gain on Available
for Sale Securities
 
Defined
Benefit 
Plan
 
Total
Beginning balance
 
$
(639
)
 
$
(4,289
)
 
$
(4,928
)
 
$
258

 
$
(4,057
)
 
$
(3,799
)
Other comprehensive income before reclassifications
 
1,033

 

 
1,033

 
2,007

 

 
2,007

Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive loss
 
(321
)
 
86

 
(235
)
 
(776
)
 
77

 
(699
)
Net current-period other comprehensive income
 
712

 
86

 
798

 
1,231

 
77

 
1,308

Ending balance
 
$
73

 
$
(4,203
)
 
$
(4,130
)
 
$
1,489

 
$
(3,980
)
 
$
(2,491
)



8

Table of Contents


The reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive loss shown, net of tax and parenthesis indicating debits to net income, as of September 30, 2017 and 2016 were as follows:
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components
 
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Affected Line Item
 in the Consolidated 
Statement of Income
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
 
Net unrealized (loss) gain on available for sale securities
 
$
302

 
$
253

 
Net securities (losses) gains, available for sale
Income tax effect
 
(104
)
 
(86
)
 
Income tax provision
Total reclassifications for the period
 
$
198

 
$
167

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net unrecognized pension costs
 
(45
)
 
(39
)
 
Salaries and employee benefits
Income tax effect
 
15

 
13

 
Income tax provision
Total reclassifications for the period
 
(30
)
 
(26
)
 
 
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss Components
 
Amount Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Loss
 
Affected Line Item
 in the Consolidated 
Statement of Income
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2017
 
Nine months ended September 30, 2016
 
Net unrealized gain on available for sale securities
 
$
487

 
$
1,174

 
Net securities gains, available for sale
Income tax effect
 
(166
)
 
(398
)
 
Income tax provision
Total reclassifications for the period
 
$
321

 
$
776

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Net unrecognized pension costs
 
(129
)
 
(117
)
 
Salaries and employee benefits
Income tax effect
 
43

 
40

 
Income tax provision
Total reclassifications for the period
 
(86
)
 
(77
)
 
 


Note 3.  Recent Accounting Pronouncements

In May 2014, the FASB issued ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (a new revenue recognition standard). The Update’s core principle is that a company will recognize revenue to depict the transfer of goods or services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for those goods or services. In addition, this Update specifies the accounting for certain costs to obtain or fulfill a contract with a customer and expands disclosure requirements for revenue recognition. Subsequently, the FASB issued ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments in this Update defer the effective date of ASU 2014-09 for all entities by one year. Public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. All other entities should apply the guidance in ASU 2014-09 to annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. Because the guidance does not apply to revenue associated with financial instruments, including loans and securities, we do not expect the new standard, or any of the amendments, to result in a material change from our current accounting for revenue because the majority of the Company's financial instruments are not within the scope of Topic 606.  However, we do expect that the standard will result in new disclosure requirements, which are currently being evaluated.

In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, Financial Instruments - Overall (Subtopic 825-10): Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This Update applies to all entities that hold financial assets or owe financial liabilities and is intended to provide more useful information on the recognition, measurement, presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. Among other things, this Update (a) requires equity investments (except those accounted for under the equity method of accounting or those that result in consolidation of the investee) to be measured at fair value with changes in fair value recognized in net income; (b) simplifies the impairment assessment of equity investments without readily determinable fair values by requiring a qualitative assessment to identify impairment; (c) eliminates the requirement to disclose the fair value of financial instruments measured at amortized cost for entities that are not public business entities; (d) eliminates the requirement for public business entities to disclose the method(s) and significant assumptions used to estimate the fair value that is required to be disclosed for financial instruments measured at amortized cost on the balance sheet; (e) requires public business entities to use the exit price notion when measuring the fair value of financial instruments for disclosure purposes; (f) requires separate presentation of financial assets and financial liabilities by measurement category and form of financial asset (that is, securities or loans and receivables) on the balance sheet or the accompanying notes to the financial statements; and (g) clarifies that an entity should evaluate the need for a valuation allowance on a deferred tax asset related to available-for-sale securities in combination with the entity’s other deferred tax assets. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, including not-for-profit entities and

9

Table of Contents


employee benefit plans within the scope of Topics 960 through 965 on plan accounting, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. All entities that are not public business entities may adopt the amendments in this Update earlier as of the fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those fiscal years. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842). The standard requires lessees to recognize the assets and liabilities that arise from leases on the balance sheet.  A lessee should recognize in the statement of financial position a liability to make lease payments (the lease liability) and a right-of-use asset representing its right to use the underlying asset for the lease term.  A short-term lease is defined as one in which (a) the lease term is 12 months or less and (b) there is not an option to purchase the underlying asset that the lessee is reasonably certain to exercise. For short-term leases, lessees may elect to recognize lease payments over the lease term on a straight-line basis. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those years. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and for interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The amendments should be applied at the beginning of the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach with earlier application permitted as of the beginning of an interim or annual reporting period. The Company is currently assessing the practical expedients it may elect at adoption, but does not anticipate the amendments will have a significant impact on the financial statements. Based on the Company’s preliminary analysis of its current portfolio, the impact to the Company’s balance sheet is estimated to result in less than a 1 percent increase in assets and liabilities. The Company also anticipates additional disclosures to be provided at adoption.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-04, Liabilities - Extinguishments of Liabilities (Subtopic 405-20). The standard provides that liabilities related to the sale of prepaid stored-value products within the scope of this Update are financial liabilities. The amendments in the Update provide a narrow-scope exception to the guidance in Subtopic 405-20 to require that breakage for those liabilities be accounted for consistent with the breakage guidance in Topic 606. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities, certain not-for-profit entities, and certain employee benefit plans for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Earlier application is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments in this Update affect entities with transactions included within the scope of Topic 606, which includes entities that enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services (that are an output of the entity’s ordinary activities) in exchange for consideration. The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle of the guidance in Topic 606; they simply clarify the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The amendments in this Update are intended to improve the operability and understandability of the implementation guidance on principal versus agent considerations. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements of Update 2014-09. ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). The amendments in this Update affect entities with transactions included within the scope of Topic 606, which includes entities that enter into contracts with customers to transfer goods or services in exchange for consideration. The amendments in this Update do not change the core principle for revenue recognition in Topic 606. Instead, the amendments provide (1) more detailed guidance in a few areas and (2) additional implementation guidance and examples based on feedback the FASB received from its stakeholders. The amendments are expected to reduce the degree of judgment necessary to comply with Topic 606, which the FASB expects will reduce the potential for diversity arising in practice and reduce the cost and complexity of applying the guidance. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements in Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09). ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.




10

Table of Contents


In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which among other things clarifies the objective of the collectability criterion in Topic 606, as well as certain narrow aspects of Topic 606. The amendments in this Update affect the guidance in ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), which is not yet effective. The effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by Update 2014-09). ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, defers the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments, which changes the impairment model for most financial assets. This Update is intended to improve financial reporting by requiring timelier recording of credit losses on loans and other financial instruments held by financial institutions and other organizations. The underlying premise of the Update is that financial assets measured at amortized cost should be presented at the net amount expected to be collected, through an allowance for credit losses that is deducted from the amortized cost basis. The allowance for credit losses should reflect management’s current estimate of credit losses that are expected to occur over the remaining life of a financial asset. The income statement will be effected for the measurement of credit losses for newly recognized financial assets, as well as the expected increases or decreases of expected credit losses that have taken place during the period. ASU 2016-13 is effective for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2019, and early adoption is permitted for annual and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2018. With certain exceptions, transition to the new requirements will be through a cumulative effect adjustment to opening retained earnings as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the guidance is adopted. We expect to recognize a one-time cumulative effect adjustment to the allowance for loan losses as of the beginning of the first reporting period in which the new standard is effective, but cannot yet determine the magnitude of any such one-time adjustment or the overall impact of the new guidance on the consolidated financial statements.

In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230): Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments, which addresses eight specific cash flow issues with the objective of reducing diversity in practice. Among these include recognizing cash payments for debt prepayment or debt extinguishment as cash outflows for financing activities; cash proceeds received from the settlement of insurance claims should be classified on the basis of the related insurance coverage; and cash proceeds received from the settlement of bank-owned life insurance policies should be classified as cash inflows from investing activities while the cash payments for premiums on bank-owned policies may be classified as cash outflows for investing activities, operating activities, or a combination of investing and operating activities. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity that elects early adoption must adopt all of the amendments in the same period. The amendments in this Update should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. If it is impracticable to apply the amendments retrospectively for some of the issues, the amendments for those issues would be applied prospectively as of the earliest date practicable. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s statement of cash flows.

In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-17, Consolidation (Topic 810), which amends the consolidation guidance on how a reporting entity that is the single decision maker of a VIE should treat indirect interests in the entity held through related parties that are under common control with the reporting entity when determining whether it is the primary beneficiary of that VIE. The primary beneficiary of a VIE is the reporting entity that has a controlling financial interest in a VIE and, therefore, consolidates the VIE. A reporting entity has an indirect interest in a VIE if it has a direct interest in a related party that, in turn, has a direct interest in the VIE. Under the amendments, a single decision maker is not required to consider indirect interests held through related parties that are under common control with the single decision maker to be the equivalent of direct interests in their entirety. Instead, a single decision maker is required to include those interests on a proportionate basis consistent with indirect interests held through other related parties. The provisions in ASU 2016-17 are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, including interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the Update is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2016, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the Update in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.





11

Table of Contents


In October 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-18, Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), which requires that a statement of cash flows explains the change during the period in the total of cash, cash equivalents, and amounts generally described as restricted cash or restricted cash equivalents. Therefore, amounts generally described as restricted cash and restricted cash equivalents should be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. The amendments in this Update are effective for public business entities for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The amendments in this Update should be applied using a retrospective transition method to each period presented. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s statement of cash flows.

In December 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-20, Technical Corrections and Improvements to Topic 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers. This Update, among others things, clarifies that guarantee fees within the scope of Topic 460, Guarantees, (other than product or service warranties) are not within the scope of Topic 606. The effective date and transition requirements for ASU 2016-20 are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for the new revenue recognition guidance. For public entities with a calendar year-end, the new guidance is effective in the quarter and year beginning January 1, 2018. For all other entities with a calendar year-end, the new guidance is effective in the year ending December 31, 2019, and interim periods in 2020. The Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption of the standard will have on the Company’s financial position or results of operations.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-01, Business Combinations (Topic 805), Clarifying the Definition of a Business, which provides a more robust framework to use in determining when a set of assets and activities (collectively referred to as a “set”) is a business. The screen requires that when substantially all of the fair value of the gross assets acquired (or disposed of) is concentrated in a single identifiable asset or a group of similar identifiable assets, the set is not a business. This screen reduces the number of transactions that need to be further evaluated. Public business entities should apply the amendments in this Update to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods within those periods. All other entities should apply the amendments to annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively on or after the effective date. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In January 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment. To simplify the subsequent measurement of goodwill, the FASB eliminated Step 2 from the goodwill impairment test. In computing the implied fair value of goodwill under Step 2, an entity had to perform procedures to determine the fair value at the impairment testing date of its assets and liabilities (including unrecognized assets and liabilities) following the procedure that would be required in determining the fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed in a business combination. Instead, under the amendments in this Update, an entity should perform its annual, or interim, goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity should recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting units fair value; however, the loss recognized should not exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to that reporting unit. A public business entity that is a U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”) filer should adopt the amendments in this Update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. A public business entity that is not an SEC filer should adopt the amendments in this Update for its annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. All other entities, including not-for-profit entities, that are adopting the amendments in this Update should do so for their annual or any interim goodwill impairment tests in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In February 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-05, Other Income-Gains and Losses from the Derecognition of Nonfinancial Assets (Subtopic 610-20). The amendments in this Update clarify what constitutes a financial asset within the scope of Subtopic 610-20. The amendments also clarify that entities should identify each distinct nonfinancial asset or in substance nonfinancial asset that is promised to a counterparty and to derecognize each asset when the counterparty obtains control. There is also additional guidance provided for partial sales of a nonfinancial asset and when derecognition, and the related gain or loss, should be recognized. The amendments in this Update are effective at the same time as the amendments in Update 2014-09. Therefore, for public entities, the amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim reporting periods within that reporting period. For all other entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim reporting periods within annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2019. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements, or the Company is currently evaluating the impact the adoption.


12

Table of Contents


In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-07, Compensation-Retirement Benefits (Topic 715). The amendments in this Update require that an employer report the service cost component in the same line item or items as other compensation costs arising from services rendered by the pertinent employees during the period. The other components of net benefit cost as defined in paragraphs 715-30-35-4 and 715-60-35-9 are required to be presented in the income statement separately from the service cost component and outside a subtotal of income from operations, if one is presented. If a separate line item or items are used to present the other components of net benefit cost, that line item or items must be appropriately described. If a separate line item or items are not used, the line item or items used in the income statement to present the other components of net benefit cost must be disclosed. The guidance is effective for public business entities for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim periods within that reporting period. For all other entities (including all nonprofit organizations “NPOs”), it is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019. This guidance is required to be applied on a retrospective basis for the presentation of the service cost component and the other components of net benefit cost and on a prospective basis for the capitalization of only the service cost component of net benefit cost. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-08, Receivables - Nonrefundable Fees and Other Costs (Subtopic 310-20). The amendments in this Update shorten the amortization period for certain callable debt securities held at a premium. Specifically, the amendments require the premium to be amortized to the earliest call date. The amendments do not require an accounting change for securities held at a discount; the discount continues to be amortized to maturity. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. An entity should apply the amendments in this Update on a modified retrospective basis through a cumulative-effect adjustment directly to retained earnings as of the beginning of the period of adoption. Additionally, in the period of adoption, an entity should provide disclosures about a change in accounting principle. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, Compensation - Stock Compensation (Topic 718), which affects any entity that changes the terms or conditions of a share-based payment award.  This Update amends the definition of modification by qualifying that modification accounting does not apply to changes to outstanding share-based payment awards that do not affect the total fair value, vesting requirements, or equity/liability classification of the awards.  The amendments in this Update are effective for all entities for annual periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including adoption in any interim period, for (1) public business entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been issued and (2) all other entities for reporting periods for which financial statements have not yet been made available for issuance. The amendments in this Update should be applied prospectively to an award modified on or after the adoption date. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-10, Service Concession Arrangements (Topic 853), which applies to the accounting by operating entities for service concession arrangements within the scope of Topic 853. The amendments in this Update clarify that the grantor (government), rather than the third-party drivers, is the customer of the operation services in all cases for service concession arrangements within the scope of Topic 853. For an entity that has not adopted Topic 606 before the issuance of this Update, the effective date and transition requirements for the amendments in this Update generally are the same as the effective date and transition requirements for Topic 606 (and any other Topic amended by ASU 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606)). ASU 2015-14, Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Deferral of the Effective Date, deferred the effective date of Update 2014-09 by one year. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In July 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-11, Earnings Per Share (Topic 260), Distinguishing Liabilities from Equity (Topic 480), and Derivative and Hedging (Topic 815). The amendments in Part I of this Update change the classification analysis of certain equity-linked financial instruments (or embedded features) with down-round features. When determining whether certain financial instruments should be classified as liabilities or equity instruments, a down-round feature no longer precludes equity classification when assessing whether the instrument is indexed to an entity’s own stock. The amendments also clarify existing disclosure requirements for equity-classified instruments. As a result, a freestanding equity-linked financial instrument (or embedded conversion option) no longer would be accounted for as a derivative liability at fair value as a result of the existence of a down-round feature. For freestanding equity classified financial instruments, the amendments require entities that present earnings per share (“EPS”) in accordance with Topic 260 to recognize the effect of the down-round feature when it is triggered. That effect is treated as a dividend and as a reduction of income available to common shareholders in basic EPS. Convertible instruments with embedded conversion options that have down- round features are now subject to the specialized guidance for contingent beneficial conversion features (in Subtopic 470-20, Debt-Debt with Conversion and Other Options), including related EPS guidance (in

13

Table of Contents


Topic 260). The amendments in Part II of this Update recharacterize the indefinite deferral of certain provisions of Topic 480 that now are presented as pending content in the Accounting Standards Codification, to a scope exception. Those amendments do not have an accounting effect. For public business entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2018. For all other entities, the amendments in Part I of this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. Early adoption is permitted for all entities, including adoption in an interim period. If an entity early adopts the amendments in an interim period, any adjustments should be reflected as of the beginning of the fiscal year that includes that interim period. The amendments in Part I of this Update should be applied either retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down-round feature by means of a cumulative-effect adjustment to the statement of financial position as of the beginning of the first fiscal year and interim period(s) in which the pending content that links to this paragraph is effective or retrospectively to outstanding financial instruments with a down-round feature for each prior reporting period presented in accordance with the guidance on accounting changes in paragraphs 250-10-45-5 through 45-10. The amendments in Part II of this Update do not require any transition guidance because those amendments do not have an accounting effect. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12, Derivatives and Hedging (Topic 850), the objective of which is to improve the financial reporting of hedging relationships to better portray the economic results of an entity’s risk management activities in its financial statements. In addition, the amendments in this Update make certain targeted improvements to simplify the application and disclosure of the hedge accounting guidance in current general accepted accounting principles. For public business entities, the amendments in this Update are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within those fiscal years. For all other entities, the amendments are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, and interim periods beginning after December 15, 2020. Early application is permitted in any period after issuance. For cash flow and net investment hedges existing at the date of adoption, an entity should apply a cumulative-effect adjustment related to eliminating the separate measurement of ineffectiveness to accumulated other comprehensive income with a corresponding adjustment to the opening balance of retained earnings as of the beginning of the fiscal year that an entity adopts the amendments in this Update. The amended presentation and disclosure guidance is required only prospectively. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

In September 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and Leases (Topic 842): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to the Staff Announcement at the July 20, 2017 EITF Meeting and Rescission of Prior SEC Staff Announcements and Observer Comments. The SEC Observer said that the SEC staff would not object if entities that are considered public business entities only because their financial statements or financial information is required to be included in another entity’s SEC filing use the effective dates for private companies when they adopt ASC 606, Revenue from Contracts with Customers, and ASC 842, Leases. The Update also supersedes certain SEC paragraphs in the Codification related to previous SEC staff announcements and moves other paragraphs, upon adoption of ASC 606 or ASC 842. This Update is not expected to have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Note 4. Per Share Data

There are no convertible securities which would affect the denominator in calculating basic and dilutive earnings per share. There were a total of 95,000 stock options, with an average exercise price of $43.64, outstanding on September 30, 2017. These options were excluded, on a weighted average basis, in the computation of diluted earnings per share for the period due to the average market price of common shares of $43.53 being less than the exercise price of the options. There were a total of 31,000 stock options outstanding for the same period end in 2016 that had an average exercise price of $42.03 and were excluded from the computation of diluted earnings per share because the average market price of common shares was $41.10 for the period. Net income as presented on the consolidated statement of income will be used as the numerator.  The following table sets forth the composition of the weighted average common shares (denominator) used in the basic and dilutive earnings per share computation.
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic
 
4,688,222

 
5,006,252

 
4,711,282

 
5,005,707

Weighted average treasury stock shares
 
(320,150
)
 
(272,452
)
 
(296,514
)
 
(269,863
)
Weighted average common shares outstanding - diluted
 
4,368,072

 
4,733,800

 
4,414,768

 
4,735,844

 





14

Table of Contents



Note 5. Investment Securities
 
The amortized cost, gross unrealized gains and losses, and fair values of investment securities available for sale at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
Gross
 
 
 
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
(In Thousands)
 
Cost
 
Gains
 
Losses
 
Value
Available for sale (AFS):
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mortgage-backed securities
 
$
4,544

 
$
79

 
$
(93
)
 
$
4,530

State and political securities
 
61,868

 
640

 
(181
)
 
62,327

Other debt securities
 
52,954

 
220

 
(1,201
)
 
51,973

Total debt securities
 
119,366

 
939

 
(1,475
)
 
118,830

Financial institution equity securities
 
11,537

 
687

 

 
12,224

Non-financial institution equity securities
 
1,300

 

 
(41
)
 
1,259

Total equity securities
 
12,837

 
687

 
(41
)
 
13,483

Total investment securities AFS
 
$
132,203

 
$
1,626

 
$
(1,516
)
 
$
132,313


 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
Gross
 
 
 
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
(In Thousands)
 
Cost
 
Gains
 
Losses
 
Value
Available for sale (AFS):
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mortgage-backed securities
 
$
9,295

 
$
182

 
$
(164
)
 
$
9,313

Asset-backed securities
 
109

 

 

 
109

State and political securities
 
60,777

 
666

 
(509
)
 
60,934

Other debt securities
 
53,046

 
137

 
(2,065
)
 
51,118

Total debt securities
 
123,227

 
985

 
(2,738
)
 
121,474

Financial institution equity securities
 
9,566

 
969

 

 
10,535

Non-financial institution equity securities
 
1,667

 

 
(184
)
 
1,483

Total equity securities
 
11,233

 
969

 
(184
)
 
12,018

Total investment securities AFS
 
$
134,460

 
$
1,954

 
$
(2,922
)
 
$
133,492

 
The amortized cost and fair values of trading investment securities at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 are as follows:

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
Gross
 
 
 
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
(In Thousands)
 
Cost
 
Gains
 
Losses
 
Value
Trading:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial institution equity securities
 
$
61

 
$
3

 
$
(1
)
 
$
63

Non-financial institution equity securities
 
157

 
4

 
(14
)
 
147

Total trading securities
 
$
218

 
$
7

 
$
(15
)
 
$
210



15

Table of Contents


 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
Gross
 
 
 
 
Amortized
 
Unrealized
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
(In Thousands)
 
Cost
 
Gains
 
Losses
 
Value
Trading:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial institution equity securities
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

Non-financial institution equity securities
 
56

 
2

 

 
58

Total trading securities
 
$
56

 
$
2

 
$

 
$
58


Total net trading losses of $4,000 and $2,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 compared to net trading gains of $8,000 and $54,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2016 were included in the Consolidated Statement of Income.

The following tables show the Company’s gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time, that the individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
 
Less than Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months or Greater
 
Total
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
(In Thousands)
 
Value
 
Losses
 
Value
 
Losses
 
Value
 
Losses
Available for sale (AFS):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
 
$
1,048

 
$
(4
)
 
$
2,302

 
$
(89
)
 
$
3,350

 
$
(93
)
State and political securities
 
13,651

 
(120
)
 
2,170

 
(61
)
 
15,821

 
(181
)
Other debt securities
 
9,689

 
(145
)
 
22,733

 
(1,056
)
 
32,422

 
(1,201
)
Total debt securities
 
24,388

 
(269
)
 
27,205

 
(1,206
)
 
51,593

 
(1,475
)
Non-financial institution equity securities
 
1,259

 
(41
)
 

 

 
1,259

 
(41
)
Total equity securities
 
1,259

 
(41
)
 

 

 
1,259

 
(41
)
Total investment securities AFS
 
$
25,647

 
$
(310
)
 
$
27,205

 
$
(1,206
)
 
$
52,852

 
$
(1,516
)

 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Less than Twelve Months
 
Twelve Months or Greater
 
Total
 
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
 
Gross
 
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
 
Fair
 
Unrealized
(In Thousands)
 
Value
 
Losses
 
Value
 
Losses
 
Value
 
Losses
Available for sale (AFS):
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Mortgage-backed securities
 
$
3,572

 
$
(106
)
 
$
3,627

 
$
(58
)
 
$
7,199

 
$
(164
)
State and political securities
 
26,113

 
(509
)
 

 

 
26,113

 
(509
)
Other debt securities
 
28,140

 
(1,179
)
 
12,240

 
(886
)
 
40,380

 
(2,065
)
Total debt securities
 
57,825

 
(1,794
)
 
15,867

 
(944
)
 
73,692

 
(2,738
)
Non-financial institution equity securities
 
727

 
(140
)
 
756

 
(44
)
 
1,483

 
(184
)
Total equity securities
 
727

 
(140
)
 
756

 
(44
)
 
1,483

 
(184
)
Total investment securities AFS
 
$
58,552

 
$
(1,934
)
 
$
16,623

 
$
(988
)
 
$
75,175

 
$
(2,922
)
 
At September 30, 2017, there were a total of 34 securities in a continuous unrealized loss position for less than twelve months and 20 individual securities that were in a continuous unrealized loss position for twelve months or greater.



16

Table of Contents


The Company reviews its position quarterly and has determined that, at September 30, 2017, the declines outlined in the above table represent temporary declines and the Company does not intend to sell and does not believe it will be required to sell these securities before recovery of their cost basis, which may be at maturity.  The Company has concluded that the unrealized losses disclosed above are not other than temporary but are the result of interest rate changes, sector credit ratings changes, or company-specific ratings changes that are not expected to result in the non-collection of principal and interest during the period.

The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at September 30, 2017, by contractual maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities may differ from contractual maturities since borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment penalties.

(In Thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
Due in one year or less
 
$
4,839

 
$
4,836

Due after one year to five years
 
45,064

 
44,918

Due after five years to ten years
 
54,858

 
54,301

Due after ten years
 
14,605

 
14,775

Total
 
$
119,366

 
$
118,830


Total gross proceeds from sales of securities available for sale for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $6,478,000 and $15,443,000, a decrease from the 2016 totals of $16,168,000 and $42,180,000.

The following table represents gross realized gains and losses within the available for sale portfolio:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In Thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Gross realized gains:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$

 
$
11

 
$

 
$
11

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 
29

 
69

 
35

State and political securities
 
313

 
146

 
343

 
784

Other debt securities
 
5

 

 
5

 
258

Financial institution equity securities
 

 
68

 
288

 
150

  Non-financial institution equity securities
 

 
73

 

 
217

Total gross realized gains
 
$
318

 
$
327

 
$
705

 
$
1,455

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross realized losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

U.S. Government and agency securities
 
$

 
$
2

 
$

 
$
5

Mortgage-backed securities
 

 

 

 

Asset-backed securities
 

 

 

 

State and political securities
 
16

 
1

 
17

 
1

Other debt securities
 

 
26

 
51

 
189

Financial institution equity securities
 

 

 

 

  Non-financial institution equity securities
 

 
45

 
150

 
86

Total gross realized losses
 
$
16

 
$
74

 
$
218

 
$
281











17

Table of Contents


The following table represents gross realized gains and losses within the trading portfolios:

 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In Thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Gross realized gains:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Financial institution equity securities
 
$
3

 
$

 
$
3

 
$
6

  Non-financial institution equity securities
 
4

 
8

 
12

 
76

Total gross realized gains
 
$
7

 
$
8

 
$
15

 
$
82

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Gross realized losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Financial institution equity securities
 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
12

  Non-financial institution equity securities
 
11

 

 
17

 
16

Total gross realized losses
 
$
11

 
$

 
$
17

 
$
28


There were no impairment charges included in gross realized losses for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively.

Investment securities with a carrying value of approximately $98,157,000 and $95,199,000 at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, respectively, were pledged to secure certain deposits, repurchase agreements, and for other purposes as required by law.


Note 6. Loans

Management segments the Banks' loan portfolio to a level that enables risk and performance monitoring according to similar risk characteristics.  Loans are segmented based on the underlying collateral characteristics.  Categories include commercial, financial, and agricultural, real estate, and installment loans to individuals.  Real estate loans are further segmented into three categories: residential, commercial, and construction.

The following table presents the related aging categories of loans, by segment, as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
 
 
 
Past Due
 
Past Due 90
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30 To 89
 
Days Or More
 
Non-
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
Current
 
Days
 
& Still Accruing
 
Accrual
 
Total
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
174,993

 
$
6

 
$
53

 
$
247

 
$
175,299

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
572,303

 
1,929

 
26

 
1,876

 
576,134

Commercial
 
316,493

 
1,144

 

 
5,873

 
323,510

Construction
 
29,243

 
9

 
100

 

 
29,352

Installment loans to individuals
 
85,872

 
625

 
82

 
60

 
86,639

 
 
1,178,904

 
$
3,713

 
$
261

 
$
8,056

 
1,190,934

Net deferred loan fees and discounts
 
(1,220
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(1,220
)
Allowance for loan losses
 
(12,933
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(12,933
)
Loans, net
 
$
1,164,751

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,176,781



18

Table of Contents


 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
 
 
Past Due
 
Past Due 90
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
30 To 89
 
Days Or More
 
Non-
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
Current
 
Days
 
& Still Accruing
 
Accrual
 
Total
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
145,179

 
$
785

 
$
14

 
$
132

 
$
146,110

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
553,053

 
9,112

 
587

 
1,988

 
564,740

Commercial
 
296,537

 
786

 
268

 
8,591

 
306,182

Construction
 
33,879

 
771

 

 

 
34,650

Installment loans to individuals
 
43,008

 
202

 
1

 
45

 
43,256

 
 
1,071,656

 
$
11,656

 
$
870

 
$
10,756

 
1,094,938

Net deferred loan fees and discounts
 
(1,257
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(1,257
)
Allowance for loan losses
 
(12,896
)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
(12,896
)
Loans, net
 
$
1,057,503

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,080,785

 
Purchased loans acquired are recorded at fair value on their purchase date without a carryover of the related allowance for loan losses.

The following table presents interest income the Banks would have recorded if interest had been recorded based on the original loan agreement terms and rate of interest for non-accrual loans and interest income recognized on a cash basis for non-accrual loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
(In Thousands)
 
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
 
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
 
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
 
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
8

 
$
2

 
$
1

 
$

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
29

 
30

 
57

 
68

Commercial
 
90

 
23

 
109

 
90

Construction
 

 

 


 

Installment
 
1

 
1

 

 

 
 
$
128

 
$
56

 
$
167

 
$
158

 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
(In Thousands)
 
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
 
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
 
Interest Income That
Would Have Been
Recorded Based on
Original Term and Rate
 
Interest
Income
Recorded on
a Cash Basis
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
21

 
$
8

 
$
5

 
$
1

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
123

 
81

 
113

 
95

Commercial
 
322

 
42

 
388

 
170

Construction
 

 

 

 

Installment
 
3

 
2

 

 

 
 
$
469

 
$
133

 
$
506

 
$
266






19

Table of Contents



Impaired Loans

Impaired loans are loans for which it is probable the Banks will not be able to collect all amounts due according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement.  The Banks evaluate such loans for impairment individually and does not aggregate loans by major risk classifications.  The definition of “impaired loans” is not the same as the definition of “non-accrual loans,” although the two categories overlap.  The Banks may choose to place a loan on non-accrual status due to payment delinquency or uncertain collectability, while not classifying the loan as impaired. Factors considered by management in determining impairment include payment status and collateral value.  The amount of impairment for these types of loans is determined by the difference between the present value of the expected cash flows related to the loan, using the original interest rate, and its recorded value, or as a practical expedient in the case of collateralized loans, the difference between the fair value of the collateral and the recorded amount of the loan.  When foreclosure is probable, impairment is measured based on the fair value of the collateral.

Management evaluates individual loans in all of the commercial segments for possible impairment if the loan is greater than $100,000 and if the loan is either on non-accrual status or has a risk rating of substandard.  Management may also elect to measure an individual loan for impairment if less than $100,000 on a case-by-case basis.

Mortgage loans on one-to-four family properties and all consumer loans are large groups of smaller-balance homogeneous loans and are measured for impairment collectively. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays, which are defined as 90 days or less, generally are not classified as impaired.  Management determines the significance of payment delays on a case-by-case basis taking into consideration all circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower including the length of the delay, the borrower’s prior payment record, and the amount of shortfall in relation to the principal and interest owed.  Interest income for impaired loans is recorded consistent with the Banks' policy on non-accrual loans.

The following table presents the recorded investment, unpaid principal balance, and related allowance of impaired loans by segment as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
 
Recorded
 
Unpaid Principal
 
Related
(In Thousands)
 
Investment
 
Balance
 
Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
1,141

 
$
1,141

 
$

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,775

 
1,775

 

Commercial
 
2,222

 
2,222

 

Installment loans to individuals
 

 

 

 
 
5,138

 
5,138

 

With an allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
255

 
255

 
207

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,022

 
1,070

 
224

Commercial
 
8,433

 
8,529

 
1,629

Installment loans to individuals
 

 

 

 
 
9,710

 
9,854

 
2,060

Total:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
1,396

 
1,396

 
207

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
2,797

 
2,845

 
224

Commercial
 
10,655

 
10,751

 
1,629

Installment loans to individuals
 

 

 

 
 
$
14,848

 
$
14,992

 
$
2,060



20

Table of Contents


 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Recorded
 
Unpaid Principal
 
Related
(In Thousands)
 
Investment
 
Balance
 
Allowance
With no related allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
109

 
$
109

 
$

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,584

 
1,584

 

Commercial
 
1,833

 
1,833

 

Installment loans to individuals
 

 

 

 
 
3,526

 
3,526

 

With an allowance recorded:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
132

 
132

 
74

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,893

 
1,893

 
437

Commercial
 
10,425

 
10,520

 
1,668

Installment loans to individuals
 

 

 

 
 
12,450

 
12,545

 
2,179

Total:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
241

 
241

 
74

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
3,477

 
3,477

 
437

Commercial
 
12,258

 
12,353

 
1,668

Installment loans to individuals
 

 

 

 
 
$
15,976

 
$
16,071

 
$
2,179


The following table presents the average recorded investment in impaired loans and related interest income recognized for the three and nine months ended for September 30, 2017 and 2016:

 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
(In Thousands)
 
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
 
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
394

 
$
17

 
$
1

 
$
346

 
$
4

 
$

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
3,199

 
12

 
34

 
2,784

 
23

 
41

Commercial
 
12,885

 
52

 
23

 
12,383

 
83

 
16

Construction
 

 

 

 
67

 

 

Installment loans to individuals
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
$
16,478

 
$
81

 
$
58

 
$
15,580

 
$
110

 
$
57


21

Table of Contents


 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
(In Thousands)
 
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
 
Average
Investment in
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on an
Accrual Basis on
Impaired Loans
 
Interest Income
Recognized on a
Cash Basis on
Impaired Loans
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
324

 
$
24

 
$
7

 
$
586

 
$
12

 
$
1

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
3,212

 
48

 
80

 
4,539

 
67

 
68

Commercial
 
12,635

 
137

 
42

 
16,988

 
247

 
96

Construction
 

 

 

 
208

 

 

Installment loans to individuals
 
8

 

 
2

 

 

 

 
 
$
16,179

 
$
209

 
$
131

 
$
22,321

 
$
326

 
$
165


Currently, there is $10,000 committed to be advanced in connection with impaired loans.

Troubled Debt Restructurings

The loan portfolio also includes certain loans that have been modified in a Troubled Debt Restructuring (“TDR”), where economic concessions have been granted to borrowers who have experienced or are expected to experience financial difficulties.  These concessions typically result from loss mitigation activities and could include reductions in the interest rate, payment extensions, forgiveness of principal, forbearance, or other actions.  Certain TDRs are classified as nonperforming at the time of restructure and may only be returned to performing status after considering the borrower’s sustained repayment performance for a reasonable period, generally six months.

There were two loan modifications that were considered TDRs completed during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017. Loan modifications that are considered TDRs completed during the three and nine months ended September 30, 2016 were as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
(In Thousands, Except Number of Contracts)
 
Number
of
Contracts
 
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
 
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
 
Number
of
Contracts
 
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
 
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 

 
$

 
$

 

 
$

 
$

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
Residential
 

 

 

 
2

 
580

 
580

Commercial
 
2

 
375

 
375

 

 

 

Construction
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
2

 
$
375

 
$
375

 
2

 
$
580

 
$
580

 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
(In Thousands, Except Number of Contracts)
 
Number
of
Contracts
 
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 
Number
of
Contracts
 
Pre-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 
Post-Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 

 
$

 
$

 

 
$

 
$

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 

 

 

 
4

 
922

 
922

Commercial
 
2

 
375

 
375

 
1

 
838

 
838

Construction
 

 

 

 

 

 

 
 
2

 
$
375

 
$
375

 
5

 
$
1,760

 
$
1,760



22

Table of Contents


There were no loan modifications considered to be TDRs made during the twelve months previous to September 30, 2017 that defaulted during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.  There were five loan modifications considered TDRs made during the twelve months previous to September 30, 2016 that defaulted during the nine months ended September 30, 2016. The defaulted loan types and recorded investments at September 30, 2016 are as follows: one commercial loan with a recorded investment of $103,000, one commercial real estate loan with a recorded investment of $239,000, and three residential real estate loan with a recorded investment of $173,000.

Troubled debt restructurings amounted to $8,429,000 and $9,180,000 as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016.

The amount of foreclosed residential real estate held at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, totaled $458,000 and $839,000, respectively. Consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, totaled $458,000 and $167,000, respectively.

Internal Risk Ratings

Management uses a ten point internal risk rating system to monitor the credit quality of the overall loan portfolio. The first six categories are considered not criticized, and are aggregated as “Pass” rated. The criticized rating categories utilized by management generally follow bank regulatory definitions. The special mention category includes assets that are currently protected but are potentially weak, resulting in an undue and unwarranted credit risk, but not to the point of justifying a substandard classification. Loans in the substandard category have well-defined weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt, and have a distinct possibility that some loss will be sustained if the weaknesses are not corrected. All loans greater than 90 days past due are evaluated for substandard classification.  Loans in the doubtful category exhibit the same weaknesses found in the substandard loans, however, the weaknesses are more pronounced.  Such loans are static and collection in full is improbable.  However, these loans are not yet rated as loss because certain events may occur which would salvage the debt.  Loans classified loss are considered uncollectible and charge-off is imminent.

To help ensure that risk ratings are accurate and reflect the present and future capacity of borrowers to repay a loan as agreed, the Banks have a structured loan rating process with several layers of internal and external oversight.  Generally, consumer and residential mortgage loans are included in the pass category unless a specific action, such as bankruptcy, repossession, or death occurs to raise awareness of a possible credit event.  An external annual loan review of large commercial relationships is performed, as well as a sample of smaller transactions. Confirmation of the appropriate risk category is included in the review. Detailed reviews, including plans for resolution, are performed on loans classified as substandard, doubtful, or loss on a quarterly basis.

The following table presents the credit quality categories identified above as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Totals
Pass
 
$
170,812

 
$
572,591

 
$
300,679

 
$
29,202

 
$
86,639

 
$
1,159,923

Special Mention
 
775

 
1,287

 
8,522

 

 

 
10,584

Substandard
 
3,712

 
2,256

 
14,309

 
150

 

 
20,427

 
 
$
175,299

 
$
576,134

 
$
323,510

 
$
29,352

 
$
86,639

 
$
1,190,934


 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Totals
Pass
 
$
140,497

 
$
561,440

 
$
277,916

 
$
34,493

 
$
43,256

 
$
1,057,602

Special Mention
 
2,943

 
740

 
11,143

 

 

 
14,826

Substandard
 
2,670

 
2,560

 
17,123

 
157

 

 
22,510

 
 
$
146,110

 
$
564,740

 
$
306,182

 
$
34,650

 
$
43,256

 
$
1,094,938








23

Table of Contents



Allowance for Loan Losses

An allowance for loan losses (“ALL”) is maintained to absorb losses from the loan portfolio.  The ALL is based on management’s continuing evaluation of the risk characteristics and credit quality of the loan portfolio, assessment of current economic conditions, diversification and size of the portfolio, adequacy of collateral, past and anticipated future loss experience, and the amount of non-performing loans.

The Banks' methodology for determining the ALL is based on the requirements of ASC Section 310-10-35 for loans individually evaluated for impairment (previously discussed) and ASC Subtopic 450-20 for loans collectively evaluated for impairment, as well as the Interagency Policy Statements on the Allowance for Loan and Lease Losses and other bank regulatory guidance.  The total of the two components represents the Banks' ALL.

Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are analyzed with general allowances being made as appropriate.  Allowances are segmented based on collateral characteristics previously disclosed, and consistent with credit quality monitoring.  Loans that are collectively evaluated for impairment are grouped into two classes for evaluation.  A general allowance is determined for “Pass” rated credits, while a separate pool allowance is provided for “Criticized” rated credits that are not individually evaluated for impairment.

For the general allowances, historical loss trends are used in the estimation of losses in the current portfolio.  These historical loss amounts are modified by other qualitative factors.  A historical charge-off factor is calculated utilizing a twelve quarter moving average.  However, management may adjust the moving average time frame by up to four quarters to adjust for variances in the economic cycle. Management has identified a number of additional qualitative factors which it uses to supplement the historical charge-off factor because these factors are likely to cause estimated credit losses associated with the existing loan pools to differ from historical loss experience.  The additional factors that are evaluated quarterly and updated using information obtained from internal, regulatory, and governmental sources are: national and local economic trends and conditions; levels of and trends in delinquency rates and non-accrual loans; trends in volumes and terms of loans; effects of changes in lending policies; experience, ability, and depth of lending staff; value of underlying collateral; and concentrations of credit from a loan type, industry and/or geographic standpoint.

Loans in the criticized pools, which possess certain qualities or characteristics that may lead to collection and loss issues, are closely monitored by management and subject to additional qualitative factors.  Management also monitors industry loss factors by loan segment for applicable adjustments to actual loss experience.

Management reviews the loan portfolio on a quarterly basis in order to make appropriate and timely adjustments to the ALL.  When information confirms all or part of specific loans to be uncollectible, these amounts are promptly charged off against the ALL.

Activity in the allowance is presented for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Unallocated
 
Totals
Beginning Balance
 
$
1,731

 
$
5,337

 
$
3,727

 
$
172

 
$
779

 
$
1,363

 
$
13,109

Charge-offs
 
(68
)
 
(155
)
 

 

 
(55
)
 

 
(278
)
Recoveries
 
6

 
16

 

 
2

 
18

 

 
42

Provision
 
(81
)
 
232

 
300

 
(26
)
 
144

 
(509
)
 
60

Ending Balance
 
$
1,588

 
$
5,430

 
$
4,027

 
$
148

 
$
886

 
$
854

 
$
12,933

 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Unallocated
 
Totals
Beginning Balance
 
$
1,273

 
$
5,851

 
$
4,001

 
$
143

 
$
277

 
$
972

 
$
12,517

Charge-offs
 
(18
)
 
(4
)
 

 

 
(67
)
 

 
(89
)
Recoveries
 
4

 
8

 
3

 
1

 
16

 

 
32

Provision
 
(9
)
 
(550
)
 
642

 
(29
)
 
111

 
93

 
258

Ending Balance
 
$
1,250

 
$
5,305

 
$
4,646

 
$
115

 
$
337

 
$
1,065

 
$
12,718

 

24

Table of Contents


 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Unallocated
 
Totals
Beginning Balance
 
$
1,554

 
$
5,383

 
$
4,975

 
$
178

 
$
416

 
$
390

 
$
12,896

Charge-offs
 
(81
)
 
(540
)
 

 

 
(186
)
 

 
(807
)
Recoveries
 
117

 
51

 
1

 
7

 
63

 

 
239

Provision
 
(2
)
 
536

 
(949
)
 
(37
)
 
593

 
464

 
605

Ending Balance
 
$
1,588

 
$
5,430

 
$
4,027

 
$
148

 
$
886

 
$
854

 
$
12,933

 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
 
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
Unallocated
 
Totals
Beginning Balance
 
$
1,532

 
$
5,116

 
$
4,217

 
$
160

 
$
243

 
$
776

 
$
12,044

Charge-offs
 
(167
)
 
(11
)
 

 

 
(171
)
 

 
(349
)
Recoveries
 
56

 
14

 
8

 
6

 
73

 

 
157

Provision
 
(171
)
 
186

 
421

 
(51
)
 
192

 
289

 
866

Ending Balance
 
$
1,250

 
$
5,305

 
$
4,646

 
$
115

 
$
337

 
$
1,065

 
$
12,718


The shifts in allocation of the loan provision is due to an increase in residential originations along with a tapering of commercial originations along with the increase in installment loan volume. Within installment loans to individuals is indirect auto lending that was started during 2016.

The Company grants commercial, industrial, residential, and installment loans to customers primarily throughout north-east and central Pennsylvania. Although the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of its debtors’ ability to honor their contracts is dependent on the economic conditions within this region.

The Company has a concentration of the following to gross loans at September 30, 2017 and 2016:
 
 
 
September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
Owners of residential rental properties
 
15.34
%
 
16.64
%
Owners of commercial rental properties
 
13.45
%
 
14.11
%
 
The following table presents the balance in the allowance for loan losses and the recorded investment in loans by portfolio segment based on impairment method as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
Unallocated
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
 
Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
207

 
$
224

 
$
1,629

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
2,060

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
1,381

 
5,206

 
2,398

 
148

 
886

 
854

 
10,873

Total ending allowance balance
 
$
1,588

 
$
5,430

 
$
4,027

 
$
148

 
$
886

 
$
854

 
$
12,933

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
1,396

 
$
2,797

 
$
10,655

 
$

 
$

 


 
$
14,848

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
173,903

 
573,337

 
312,855

 
29,352

 
86,639

 


 
1,176,086

Total ending loans balance
 
$
175,299

 
$
576,134

 
$
323,510

 
$
29,352

 
$
86,639

 


 
$
1,190,934



25

Table of Contents


 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Commercial, Financial, and Agricultural
 
Real Estate Mortgages
 
Installment Loans to Individuals
 
Unallocated
 
 
(In Thousands)
 
 
Residential
 
Commercial
 
Construction
 
 
 
Totals
Allowance for Loan Losses:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Ending allowance balance attributable to loans:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
74

 
$
437

 
$
1,668

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
2,179

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
1,480

 
4,946

 
3,307

 
178

 
416

 
390

 
10,717

Total ending allowance balance
 
$
1,554

 
$
5,383

 
$
4,975

 
$
178

 
$
416

 
$
390

 
$
12,896

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Loans:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Individually evaluated for impairment
 
$
241

 
$
3,477

 
$
12,258

 
$

 
$

 
 

 
$
15,976

Collectively evaluated for impairment
 
145,869

 
561,263

 
293,924

 
34,650

 
43,256

 
 

 
1,078,962

Total ending loans balance
 
$
146,110

 
$
564,740

 
$
306,182

 
$
34,650

 
$
43,256

 
 

 
$
1,094,938



Note 7.  Net Periodic Benefit Cost-Defined Benefit Plans

For a detailed disclosure on the Company’s pension and employee benefits plans, please refer to Note 13 of the Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.

The following sets forth the components of the net periodic benefit/cost of the domestic non-contributory defined benefit plan for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In Thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Service cost
 
$
41

 
$
17

 
$
124

 
$
51

Interest cost
 
188

 
193

 
566

 
579

Expected return on plan assets
 
(262
)
 
(251
)
 
(787
)
 
(753
)
Amortization of net loss
 
45

 
39

 
129

 
117

Net periodic benefit cost
 
$
12

 
$
(2
)
 
$
32

 
$
(6
)

Employer Contributions

The Company previously disclosed in its consolidated financial statements, included in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016, that it expected to contribute a minimum of $500,000 to its defined benefit plan in 2017.  As of September 30, 2017, there were contributions of $500,000 made to the plan with additional contributions of at least $250,000 anticipated during the remainder of 2017.
 

Note 8.  Employee Stock Purchase Plan

The Company maintains an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (“Plan”).  The Plan is intended to encourage employee participation in the ownership and economic progress of the Company.  The Plan allows for up to 1,000,000 shares to be purchased by employees.  The purchase price of the shares is 95% of market value with an employee eligible to purchase up to the lesser of 15% of base compensation or $12,000 in market value annually.  During the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016, there were 1,611 and 1,617 shares issued under the plan, respectively.







26

Table of Contents


Note 9.  Off Balance Sheet Risk

The Company is a party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.  These financial instruments are primarily comprised of commitments to extend credit, standby letters of credit, and credit exposure from the sale of assets with recourse.  These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate, or liquidity risk in excess of the amount recognized in the Consolidated Balance Sheet.  The contract amounts of these instruments express the extent of involvement the Company has in particular classes of financial instruments.

The Company’s exposure to credit loss from nonperformance by the other party to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of these instruments.  The Company uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.  The Company may require collateral or other security to support financial instruments with off-balance sheet credit risk.

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk are as follows at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:

(In Thousands)
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Commitments to extend credit
 
$
270,046

 
$
263,487

Standby letters of credit
 
9,923

 
6,515

Credit exposure from the sale of assets with recourse
 
4,699

 
6,341

 
 
$
284,668

 
$
276,343

 
Commitments to extend credit are legally binding agreements to lend to customers.  Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of fees.  Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future liquidity requirements.  The Company evaluates each customer’s credit worthiness on a case-by-case basis.  The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Company, on an extension of credit is based on management’s credit assessment of the counterparty.

Standby letters of credit represent conditional commitments issued by the Company to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.  These instruments are issued primarily to support bid or performance related contracts.  The coverage period for these instruments is typically a one year period with an annual renewal option subject to prior approval by management.  Fees earned from the issuance of these letters are recognized upon expiration of the coverage period.  For secured letters of credit, the collateral is typically Bank deposit instruments or customer business assets.


Note 10.  Fair Value Measurements

The following disclosures show the hierarchal disclosure framework associated with the level of pricing observations utilized in measuring assets and liabilities at fair value.
Level I:
 
Quoted prices are available in active markets for identical assets or liabilities as of the reported date.
 
 
 
Level II:
 
Pricing inputs are other than quoted prices in active markets, which are either directly or indirectly observable as of the reported date. The nature of these assets and liabilities include items for which quoted prices are available but traded less frequently, and items that are fair valued using other financial instruments, the parameters of which can be directly observed.
 
 
 
Level III:
 
Assets and liabilities that have little to no pricing observability as of the reported date. These items do not have two-way markets and are measured using management’s best estimate of fair value, where the inputs into the determination of fair value require significant management judgment or estimation.

This hierarchy requires the use of observable market data when available.








27

Table of Contents


The following table presents the assets reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value on a recurring basis as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
 
 
September 30, 2017
(In Thousands)
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
 
Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Investment securities, available for sale:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mortgage-backed securities
 
$

 
$
4,530

 
$

 
$
4,530

State and political securities
 

 
62,327

 

 
62,327

Other debt securities
 

 
51,973

 

 
51,973

Financial institution equity securities
 
12,224

 

 

 
12,224

  Non-financial institution equity securities
 
1,259

 

 

 
1,259

Investment securities, trading:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial institution equity securities
 
63

 

 

 
63

   Non-financial institution equity securities
 
147

 

 

 
147


 
 
December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
 
Total
Assets measured on a recurring basis:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Investment securities, available for sale:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mortgage-backed securities
 
$

 
$
9,313

 
$

 
$
9,313

Asset-backed securities
 

 
109

 

 
109

State and political securities
 

 
60,934

 

 
60,934

Other debt securities
 

 
51,118

 

 
51,118

Financial institution equity securities
 
10,535

 

 

 
10,535

  Non-financial institution equity securities
 
1,483

 

 

 
1,483

Investment securities, trading:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
   Non-financial institution equity securities
 
58

 

 

 
58

 
The following table presents the assets reported on the Consolidated Balance Sheet at their fair value on a non-recurring basis as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, by level within the fair value hierarchy. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. 
 
 
September 30, 2017
(In Thousands)
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
 
Total
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Impaired loans
 
$

 
$

 
$
12,788

 
$
12,788

Other real estate owned
 

 

 
108

 
108


 
 
December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
 
Total
Assets measured on a non-recurring basis:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Impaired loans
 
$

 
$

 
$
13,797

 
$
13,797

Other real estate owned
 

 

 
839

 
839

 




28

Table of Contents


The following tables present a listing of significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement process for items valued utilizing level III techniques as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
 
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
(In Thousands)
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation Technique(s)
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Range
 
Weighted Average
Impaired loans
 
$
5,753

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Temporary reduction in payment amount
 
0 to (100)%
 
(18)%
 
 
7,035

 
Appraisal of collateral (1)
 
Appraisal adjustments (1)
 
0 to (20)%
 
(16)%
Other real estate owned
 
$
108

 
Appraisal of collateral (1)
 
Appraisal adjustments (1)
 
(20)%
 
(20)%
(1) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.
 
 
December 31, 2016
 
 
Quantitative Information About Level III Fair Value Measurements
(In Thousands)
 
Fair Value
 
Valuation Technique(s)
 
Unobservable Inputs
 
Range
 
Weighted Average
Impaired loans
 
$
5,304

 
Discounted cash flow
 
Temporary reduction in payment amount
 
0 to (70)%
 
(20)%
 
 
8,493

 
Appraisal of collateral (1)
 
Appraisal adjustments (1)
 
0 to (20)%
 
(15)%
Other real estate owned
 
$
839

 
Appraisal of collateral (1)
 
Appraisal adjustments (1)
 
(20)%
 
(20)%
(1) Appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.

The discounted cash flow valuation technique is utilized to determine the fair value of performing impaired loans, while non-performing impaired loans utilize the appraisal of collateral method.

The significant unobservable inputs used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique include temporary changes in payment amounts and the probability of default.  Significant increases (decreases) in payment amounts would result in significantly higher (lower) fair value measurements.  The probability of default is 0% for impaired loans using the discounted cash flow valuation technique because all defaulted impaired loans are valued using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.

The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique include appraisal adjustments, which are adjustments to appraisals by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses.  The significant unobservable input used in the fair value measurement of the Company’s other real estate owned are the same inputs used to value impaired loans using the appraisal of collateral valuation technique.
 

Note 11. Fair Value of Financial Instruments

The Company is required to disclose fair values for its financial instruments.  Fair values are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument.  These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.  Also, it is the Company’s general practice and intention to hold most of its financial instruments to maturity and not to engage in trading or sales activities.  Because no market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors.  These fair values are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision.  Changes in assumptions can significantly affect the fair values.

Fair values have been determined by the Company using historical data and an estimation methodology suitable for each category of financial instruments.  The Company’s fair values, methods, and assumptions are set forth below for the Company’s other financial instruments.


29

Table of Contents


As certain assets and liabilities, such as deferred tax assets, premises and equipment, and many other operational elements of the Company, are not considered financial instruments but have value, this fair value of financial instruments would not represent the full market value of the Company.

The fair values of the Company’s financial instruments are as follows at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
 
Carrying
 
Fair
 
Fair Value Measurements at September 30, 2017
(In Thousands)
 
Value
 
Value
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
Financial assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
27,747

 
$
27,747

 
$
27,747

 
$

 
$

Investment securities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Available for sale
 
132,313

 
132,313

 
13,483

 
118,830

 

Trading
 
210

 
210

 
210

 

 

Loans held for sale
 
1,734

 
1,734

 
1,734

 

 

Loans, net
 
1,176,781

 
1,210,822

 

 

 
1,210,822

Bank-owned life insurance
 
27,827

 
27,827

 
27,827

 

 

Accrued interest receivable
 
4,289

 
4,289

 
4,289

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest-bearing deposits
 
$
843,166

 
$
845,103

 
$
637,841

 
$

 
$
207,262

Noninterest-bearing deposits
 
310,830

 
310,830

 
310,830

 

 

Short-term borrowings
 
41,596

 
41,596

 
41,596

 

 

Long-term borrowings
 
80,998

 
80,787

 

 

 
80,787

Accrued interest payable
 
483

 
483

 
483

 

 


 
 
Carrying
 
Fair
 
Fair Value Measurements at December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Value
 
Value
 
Level I
 
Level II
 
Level III
Financial assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Cash and cash equivalents
 
$
43,671

 
$
43,671

 
$
43,671

 
$

 
$

Investment securities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Available for sale
 
133,492

 
133,492

 
12,018

 
121,474

 

Trading
 
58

 
58

 
58

 

 

Loans held for sale
 
1,953

 
1,953

 
1,953

 

 

Loans, net
 
1,080,785

 
1,088,122

 

 

 
1,088,122

Bank-owned life insurance
 
27,332

 
27,332

 
27,332

 

 

Accrued interest receivable
 
3,672

 
3,672

 
3,672

 

 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Financial liabilities:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Interest-bearing deposits
 
$
791,937

 
$
789,401

 
$
571,768

 
$

 
$
217,633

Noninterest-bearing deposits
 
303,277

 
303,277

 
303,277

 

 

Short-term borrowings
 
13,241

 
13,241

 
13,241

 

 

Long-term borrowings
 
85,998

 
86,353

 

 

 
86,353

Accrued interest payable
 
455

 
455

 
455

 

 

 
Cash and Cash Equivalents, Loans Held for Sale, Accrued Interest Receivable, Short-term Borrowings, and Accrued Interest Payable:
The fair value is equal to the carrying value.

Investment Securities:
The fair value of investment securities available for sale and trading is equal to the available quoted market price. If no quoted market price is available, fair value is estimated using the quoted market price for similar securities.  Regulatory stocks’ fair value is equal to the carrying value.



30

Table of Contents


Loans:
Fair values are estimated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics.  Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, financial, and agricultural, commercial real estate, residential real estate, construction real estate, and installment loans to individuals.  Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable rate interest terms and by performing and nonperforming categories.

The fair value of performing loans is calculated by discounting scheduled cash flows through the estimated maturity using estimated market discount rates that reflect the credit and interest rate risk inherent in the loan.  The estimate of maturity is based on the Company’s historical experience with repayments for each loan classification, modified, as required, by an estimate of the effect of current economic and lending conditions.

Fair value for significant nonperforming loans is based on recent external appraisals.  If appraisals are not available, estimated cash flows are discounted using a rate commensurate with the risk associated with the estimated cash flows.  Assumptions regarding credit risk, cash flows, and discounted rates are judgmentally determined using available market information and specific borrower information.

Bank-Owned Life Insurance:
The fair value is equal to the cash surrender value of the life insurance policies.

Deposits:
The fair value of deposits with no stated maturity, such as noninterest-bearing demand deposits, savings, NOW, and money market accounts, is equal to the amount payable on demand.  The fair value of certificates of deposit is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.

The fair value estimates above do not include the benefit that results from the low-cost funding provided by the deposit liabilities compared to the cost of borrowing funds in the market, commonly referred to as the core deposit intangible.


Long Term Borrowings:
The fair value of long term borrowings is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows.

Commitments to Extend Credit, Standby Letters of Credit, and Financial Guarantees Written:
There is no material difference between the notional amount and the estimated fair value of off-balance sheet items.  The contractual amounts of unfunded commitments and letters of credit are presented in Note 9 (Off Balance Sheet Risk).
 

Note 12.  Stock Options

In 2014, the Company adopted the 2014 Equity Incentive Plan designed to help the Company attract, retain, and motivate employees and non-employee directors. Incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, and restricted stock may be granted as part of the plan.

On August 27, 2015, the Company issued 38,750 stock options with a strike price of $42.03 to employees that have a five year vesting period and expire ten years from the grant date. On March 24, 2017, the Company issued 70,000 stock options in total, to a group of employees, that have a strike price of $44.21. The options granted in 2017 all expire ten years from the grant date however, of the 70,000 grants awarded, 46,250 of the options have a three year vesting period while the remaining 23,750 options vest in five years.

Stock Options Granted
Date
 
Shares
 
Forfeited
 
Outstanding
 
Strike Price
 
Vesting Period
 
Expiration
March 24, 2017
 
46,250

 

 
46,250

 
$
44.21

 
3 years
 
10 years
March 24, 2017
 
23,750

 

 
23,750

 
44.21

 
5 years
 
10 years
August 27, 2015
 
38,750

 
(13,750
)
 
25,000

 
42.03

 
5 years
 
10 years





31

Table of Contents



A summary of stock option activity is presented below:
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
September 30, 2016
 
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
 
Shares
 
Weighted Average Exercise Price
Outstanding, beginning of year
 
26,500

 
$
42.03

 
34,750

 
$
42.03

Granted
 
70,000

 
44.21

 

 

Exercised
 

 

 

 

Forfeited
 
(1,500
)
 
42.03

 
(3,750
)
 
42.03

Expired
 

 

 

 

Outstanding, end of year
 
95,000

 
$
43.64

 
31,000

 
$
42.03

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Exercisable, end of year
 

 
$

 

 
$


The estimated fair value of options, including the effect of estimated forfeitures, is recognized as expense on a straightline basis
over the options’ vesting periods while ensuring that the cumulative amount of compensation cost recognized at least equals the
value of the vested portion of the award at that date. The Company determines the fair value of options granted using the Black-Scholes option-pricing model. The risk-free interest rate is based on the United States Treasury bond with a similar term to the expected life of the options at the grant date. Expected volatility was estimated based on the adjusted historic volatility of the Company’s shares. The expected life was estimated to equal the contractual life of the options. The dividend yield rate was based upon recent historical dividends paid on shares.

Compensation expense for stock options is recognized using the fair value when the stock options are granted and is amortized over the options' vesting period. Compensation expense, with a corresponding increase in contributed surplus, related to stock options was $8,000 and $21,000 for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2017 compared to $6,000 and $17,000 for the same periods of 2016. As of September 30, 2017, no stock options were exercisable and the weighted average years to expiration were 9 years. The fair value of options granted during the three and nine month periods ending September 30, 2017 was approximately zero and $2,173,000 respectively or zero and $31.04 per award. Total unrecognized compensation cost for non-vested shares, $99,000, will be recognized over their weighted average remaining vesting period of 3.56 years.


Note 13.  Reclassification of Comparative Amounts

Certain comparative amounts for the prior period have been reclassified to conform to current period presentations. Such reclassifications had no effect on net income or shareholders’ equity.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT FOR PURPOSES OF THE PRIVATE SECURITIES LITIGATION REFORM ACT OF 1995

This Report contains certain “forward-looking statements” including statements concerning plans, objectives, future events or performance and assumptions and other statements which are other than statements of historical fact.  The Company cautions readers that the following important factors, among others, may have affected and could in the future affect the Company’s actual results and could cause the Company’s actual results for subsequent periods to differ materially from those expressed in any forward-looking statement made by or on behalf of the Company herein:  (i) the effect of changes in laws and regulations, including federal and state banking laws and regulations, with which the Company must comply, and the associated costs of compliance with such laws and regulations either currently or in the future as applicable; (ii) the effect of changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the regulatory agencies as well as by the Financial Accounting Standards Board, or of changes in the Company’s organization, compensation and benefit plans; (iii) the effect on the Company’s competitive position within its market area of the  increasing consolidation within the banking and financial services industries, including the increased competition from larger regional and out-of-state banking organizations as well as non-bank providers of various financial services; (iv) the effect of changes in interest rates; (v) the effect of changes in the business cycle and downturns in the local, regional or national economies; and (vi) the Risk Factors identified in Item 1A of the Company's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016 and in other filings made by the Company under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.


32

Table of Contents


You should not put undue reliance on any forward-looking statements.  These statements speak only as of the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, even if subsequently made available by the Company on its website or otherwise.  The Company undertakes no obligation to update or revise these statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q.

33

Table of Contents


Item 2.   Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operation

EARNINGS SUMMARY

Comparison of the Three and Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017 and 2016

Summary Results

Net income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was $3,284,000 compared to $3,059,000 for the same period of 2016 as after-tax securities gains increased $25,000 (from a gain of $172,000 to a loss of $197,000). Basic and diluted earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were $0.70 and $0.65, respectively. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.93% and 9.43% for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 0.91% and 8.69% for the corresponding period of 2016. Net income from core operations (“operating earnings”) was $3,087,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $2,887,000 for the same period of 2016. Basic and diluted operating earnings per share for the three months ended September 30, 2017 were $0.66 compared to $0.61 basic and diluted for the corresponding period of 2016. Impacting the level of operating earnings were several factors including the continued shift of earning assets from the investment portfolio to the loan portfolio as the balance sheet is actively managed to reduce market risk and interest rate risk in a rising rate environment. In addition, the effective tax rate has increased due to the conclusion of the ten year tax credit generation period of several low income elderly housing projects in our market footprint in which the company participates.

Net income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was $9,057,000 compared to $9,529,000 for the same period of 2016 as after-tax securities gains decreased $490,000 (from a gain of $810,000 to a gain of $320,000). Basic and diluted earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 were $1.92 and $2.01, respectively. Return on average assets and return on average equity were 0.87% and 8.69% for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 0.95% and 9.14% for the corresponding period of 2016. Net income from core operations (“operating earnings”) increased to $8,737,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to $8,719,000 for the same period of 2016. Basic and diluted operating earnings per share for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 were $1.85 compared to $1.84 basic and diluted for the corresponding period of 2016.

Management uses the non-GAAP measure of net income from core operations, or operating earnings, in its analysis of the Company’s performance.  This measure, as used by the Company, adjusts net income by excluding significant gains or losses that are unusual in nature.  Because certain of these items and their impact on the Company’s performance are difficult to predict, management believes the presentation of financial measures excluding the impact of such items provides useful supplemental information in evaluating the operating results of the Company’s core businesses.  For purposes of this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q, net income from core operations, or operating earnings, means net income adjusted to exclude after-tax net securities gains or losses and bank-owned life insurance gains on death benefit.  These disclosures should not be viewed as a substitute for net income determined in accordance with GAAP, nor are they necessarily comparable to non-GAAP performance measures that may be presented by other companies.

Reconciliation of GAAP and Non-GAAP Financial Measures
(Dollars in Thousands, Except Per Share Data)
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
GAAP net income
 
$
3,284

 
$
3,059

 
$
9,057

 
$
9,529

Less: net securities gains, net of tax
 
197

 
172

 
320

 
810

Non-GAAP operating earnings
 
$
3,087

 
$
2,887

 
$
8,737

 
$
8,719

 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Return on average assets (ROA)
 
0.93
%
 
0.91
%
 
0.87
%
 
0.95
%
Less: net securities gains, net of tax
 
0.05
%
 
0.05
%
 
0.03
%
 
0.08
%
Non-GAAP operating ROA
 
0.88
%
 
0.86
%
 
0.84
%
 
0.87
%

34

Table of Contents


 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Return on average equity (ROE)
 
9.43
%
 
8.69
%
 
8.69
%
 
9.14
%
Less: net securities gains, net of tax
 
0.56
%
 
0.49
%
 
0.31
%
 
0.78
%
Non-GAAP operating ROE
 
8.87
%
 
8.20
%
 
8.38
%
 
8.36
%
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Basic earnings per share (EPS)
 
$
0.70

 
$
0.65

 
$
1.92

 
$
2.01

Less: net securities gains, net of tax
 
0.04

 
0.04

 
0.07

 
0.17

Non-GAAP basic operating EPS
 
$
0.66

 
$
0.61

 
$
1.85

 
$
1.84

 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Dilutive EPS
 
$
0.70

 
$
0.65

 
$
1.92

 
$
2.01

Less: net securities gains, net of tax
 
0.04

 
0.04

 
0.07

 
0.17

Non-GAAP dilutive operating EPS
 
$
0.66

 
$
0.61

 
$
1.85

 
$
1.84

 

Interest and Dividend Income

Interest and dividend income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 increased to $12,948,000 compared to $11,660,000 for the same period of 2016.  Loan portfolio income increased due to the impact of portfolio growth, primarily in home equity products and indirect auto lending.  The loan portfolio income increase was offset by a decrease in investment portfolio interest due to a slight decline in the average taxable equivalent yield as the duration in the investment portfolio continues to be shortened in order to reduce interest rate and market risk in the future. This is being undertaken primarily through the sale of long-term municipal bonds that have a maturity date of 2025 or later and securities with a call date within the next five years.

During the nine months ended September 30, 2017, interest and dividend income was $36,839,000, an increase of $1,783,000 over the same period of 2016. Interest income on the loan portfolio increased as the growth in the portfolio was countered by a 2 bp decline in average yield. The investment portfolio interest income decreased as the portfolio size was decreased in order to reduce interest rate and market risk, while the yield on the investment portfolio declined 27 bp.

Interest and dividend income composition for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
September 30, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Loans including fees
 
$
11,906

 
91.95
%
 
$
10,541

 
90.40
%
 
$
1,365

 
12.95

%
Investment securities:
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
Taxable
 
553

 
4.27
 
 
601

 
5.15
 
 
(48
)
 
(7.99
)
 
Tax-exempt
 
319

 
2.46
 
 
329

 
2.82
 
 
(10
)
 
(3.04
)
 
Dividend and other interest income
 
170

 
1.32
 
 
189

 
1.63
 
 
(19
)
 
(10.05
)
 
Total interest and dividend income
 
$
12,948

 
100.00
%
 
$
11,660

 
100.00
%
 
$
1,288

 
11.05

%
 
 
Nine Months Ended
 
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
September 30, 2016
 
Change
 
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
 
Loans including fees
 
$
33,642

 
91.32
%
 
$
31,362

 
89.46
%
 
$
2,280

 
7.27

%
Investment securities:
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 
 
 
 

 
 

 
Taxable
 
1,665

 
4.52
 
 
1,825

 
5.21
 
 
(160
)
 
(8.77
)
 
Tax-exempt
 
940

 
2.55
 
 
1,203

 
3.43
 
 
(263
)
 
(21.86
)
 
Dividend and other interest income
 
592

 
1.61
 
 
666

 
1.90
 
 
(74
)
 
(11.11
)
 
Total interest and dividend income
 
$
36,839

 
100.00
%
 
$
35,056

 
100.00
%
 
$
1,783

 
5.09

%

35

Table of Contents


Interest Expense

Interest expense for the three months ended September 30, 2017 increased $83,000 to $1,496,000 compared to $1,413,000 for the same period of 2016.  The increase in interest expense is the result of growth within the deposit portfolio and the lengthening of the time deposit portfolio as part of a strategy to build balance sheet protection in a rising rate environment, offset by a decrease in long-term borrowing utilization.

Interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 increased $81,000 from the same period of 2016. The reasons noted for the three month period comparison also apply to the nine month period.

Interest expense composition for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
September 30, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Deposits
 
$
1,058

 
70.72
%
 
$
909

 
64.33
%
 
$
149

 
16.39

%
Short-term borrowings
 
31

 
2.07
 
 
7

 
0.50
 
 
24

 
342.86

 
Long-term borrowings
 
407

 
27.21
 
 
497

 
35.17
 
 
(90
)
 
(18.11
)
 
Total interest expense
 
$
1,496

 
100.00
%
 
$
1,413

 
100.00
%
 
$
83

 
5.87

%
 
 
Nine Months Ended
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
September 30, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Deposits
 
$
2,968

 
70.22
%
 
$
2,624

 
63.29
%
 
$
344

 
13.11

%
Short-term borrowings
 
39

 
0.92
 
 
41

 
0.99
 
 
(2
)
 
(4.88
)
 
Long-term borrowings
 
1,220

 
28.86
 
 
1,481

 
35.72
 
 
(261
)
 
(17.62
)
 
Total interest expense
 
$
4,227

 
100.00
%
 
$
4,146

 
100.00
%
 
$
81

 
1.95

%

Net Interest Margin

The net interest margin (“NIM”) for the three months ended September 30, 2017 was 3.57% compared to 3.37% for the corresponding period of 2016.  The impact of the decreasing investment portfolio balance was offset by 9.68% growth in the balance of the average loan portfolio from September 30, 2016 to September 30, 2017. The primary funding for the loan growth was an increase in core deposits. These deposits represent a lower cost funding source than time deposits and comprise 81.94% of total deposits at September 30, 2017 compared to 79.60% at September 30, 2016. Limiting the positive impact on the net interest margin caused by the growth in core deposits was the lengthening of the time deposit portfolio.

The NIM for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 was 3.47% compared to 3.45% for the same period of 2016.  The impact of the decreasing investment portfolio balance was partially offset by growth in the balance of the average loan portfolio from September 30, 2016 to September 30, 2017. The rate on interest-bearing liabilities decreased slightly as the usage of borrowed funds declined.

36

Table of Contents


The following is a schedule of average balances and associated yields for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

 
 
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
 
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2017
 
Three Months Ended September 30, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Average Balance (1)
 
Interest
 
Average Rate
 
Average Balance (1)
 
Interest
 
Average Rate
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Tax-exempt loans (3)
 
$
53,850

 
$
494

 
3.64
%
 
$
45,715

 
$
452

 
3.93
%
All other loans
 
1,105,615

 
11,580

 
4.16
%
 
1,011,393

 
10,243

 
4.03
%
Total loans (2)
 
1,159,465

 
12,074

 
4.13
%
 
1,057,108

 
10,695

 
4.02
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxable securities
 
83,106

 
674

 
3.24
%
 
93,893

 
725

 
3.09
%
Tax-exempt securities (3)
 
53,320

 
483

 
3.62
%
 
49,231

 
498

 
4.05
%
Total securities
 
136,426

 
1,157

 
3.39
%
 
143,124

 
1,223

 
3.42
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
 
14,085

 
49

 
1.38
%
 
48,125

 
65

 
0.54
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total interest-earning assets
 
1,309,976

 
13,280

 
4.02
%
 
1,248,357

 
11,983

 
3.82
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other assets
 
101,035

 
 

 
 

 
101,312

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
$
1,411,011

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,349,669

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Savings
 
$
157,341

 
15

 
0.04
%
 
$
151,464

 
15

 
0.04
%
Super Now deposits
 
203,531

 
140

 
0.27
%
 
184,440

 
107

 
0.23
%
Money market deposits
 
284,155

 
267

 
0.37
%
 
245,643

 
170

 
0.28
%
Time deposits
 
206,563

 
636

 
1.22
%
 
223,082

 
617

 
1.10
%
Total interest-bearing deposits
 
851,590

 
1,058

 
0.49
%
 
804,629

 
909

 
0.45
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term borrowings
 
19,127

 
31

 
0.64
%
 
15,748

 
7

 
0.18
%
Long-term borrowings
 
81,107

 
407

 
1.96
%
 
91,025

 
497

 
2.14
%
Total borrowings
 
100,234

 
438

 
1.71
%
 
106,773

 
504

 
1.85
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
951,824

 
1,496

 
0.62
%
 
911,402

 
1,413

 
0.61
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand deposits
 
304,244

 
 

 
 

 
281,586

 
 

 
 

Other liabilities
 
15,708

 
 

 
 

 
15,916

 
 

 
 

Shareholders’ equity
 
139,235

 
 

 
 

 
140,765

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,411,011

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,349,669

 
 

 
 

Interest rate spread
 
 

 
 

 
3.40
%
 
 

 
 

 
3.21
%
Net interest income/margin
 
 

 
$
11,784

 
3.57
%
 
 

 
$
10,570

 
3.37
%

1.              Information on this table has been calculated using average daily balance sheets to obtain average balances.
2.              Non-accrual loans have been included with loans for the purpose of analyzing net interest earnings.
3.              Income and rates on a fully taxable equivalent basis include an adjustment for the difference between annual income from tax-exempt obligations and the taxable equivalent of such income at the standard 34% tax rate.

37

Table of Contents


 
 
AVERAGE BALANCES AND INTEREST RATES
 
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2017
 
Nine Months Ended September 30, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Average Balance (1)
 
Interest
 
Average Rate
 
Average Balance (1)
 
Interest
 
Average Rate
Assets:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Tax-exempt loans (3)
 
$
46,752

 
$
1,315

 
3.76
%
 
$
49,204

 
$
1,432

 
3.89
%
All other loans
 
1,081,148

 
32,774

 
4.05
%
 
999,685

 
30,417

 
4.06
%
Total loans (2)
 
1,127,900

 
34,089

 
4.04
%
 
1,048,889

 
31,849

 
4.06
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Taxable securities
 
85,417

 
2,039

 
3.18
%
 
95,652

 
2,344

 
3.27
%
Tax-exempt securities
 
50,972

 
1,424

 
3.72
%
 
56,291

 
1,823

 
4.32
%
Total securities
 
136,389

 
3,463

 
3.39
%
 
151,943

 
4,167

 
3.66
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest-bearing deposits
 
27,901

 
218

 
1.04
%
 
38,411

 
147

 
0.51
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total interest-earning assets
 
1,292,190

 
37,770

 
3.91
%
 
1,239,243

 
36,163

 
3.90
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Other assets
 
102,181

 
 

 
 

 
99,295

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total assets
 
$
1,394,371

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,338,538

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Liabilities and shareholders’ equity:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Savings
 
$
157,396

 
45

 
0.04
%
 
$
151,158

 
43

 
0.04
%
Super Now deposits
 
198,560

 
377

 
0.25
%
 
190,190

 
356

 
0.25
%
Money market deposits
 
278,436

 
713

 
0.34
%
 
234,918

 
471

 
0.27
%
Time deposits
 
207,331

 
1,833

 
1.18
%
 
221,676

 
1,754

 
1.06
%
Total interest-bearing deposits
 
841,723

 
2,968

 
0.47
%
 
797,942

 
2,624

 
0.44
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Short-term borrowings
 
13,714

 
39

 
0.26
%
 
20,273

 
41

 
0.27
%
Long-term borrowings
 
79,881

 
1,220

 
2.01
%
 
91,025

 
1,481

 
2.14
%
Total borrowings
 
93,595

 
1,259

 
1.76
%
 
111,298

 
1,522

 
1.80
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
935,318

 
4,227

 
0.60
%
 
909,240

 
4,146

 
0.61
%
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Demand deposits
 
301,567

 
 

 
 

 
274,488

 
 

 
 

Other liabilities
 
18,455

 
 

 
 

 
15,775

 
 

 
 

Shareholders’ equity
 
139,031

 
 

 
 

 
139,035

 
 

 
 

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Total liabilities and shareholders’ equity
 
$
1,394,371

 
 

 
 

 
$
1,338,538

 
 

 
 

Interest rate spread
 
 

 
 

 
3.31
%
 
 

 
 

 
3.29
%
Net interest income/margin
 
 

 
$
33,543

 
3.47
%
 
 

 
$
32,017

 
3.45
%

The following table presents the adjustment to convert net interest income to net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
(In Thousands)
 
2017
 
2016
 
2017
 
2016
Total interest income
 
$
12,948

 
$
11,660

 
$
36,839

 
$
35,056

Total interest expense
 
1,496

 
1,413

 
4,227

 
4,146

Net interest income
 
11,452

 
10,247

 
32,612

 
30,910

Tax equivalent adjustment
 
332

 
323

 
931

 
1,107

Net interest income (fully taxable equivalent)
 
$
11,784

 
$
10,570

 
$
33,543

 
$
32,017

 

38

Table of Contents


The following table sets forth the respective impact that both volume and rate changes have had on net interest income on a fully taxable equivalent basis for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016:

 
 
Three Months Ended September 30,
 
Nine Months Ended September 30,
 
 
2017 vs. 2016
 
2017 vs. 2016
 
 
Increase (Decrease) Due to
 
Increase (Decrease) Due to
(In Thousands)
 
Volume
 
Rate
 
Net
 
Volume
 
Rate
 
Net
Interest income:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Tax-exempt loans
 
$
76

 
$
(34
)
 
$
42

 
$
(70
)
 
$
(47
)
 
$
(117
)
All other loans
 
993

 
344

 
1,337

 
2,384

 
(27
)
 
2,357

Taxable investment securities
 
(86
)
 
35

 
(51
)
 
(242
)
 
(63
)
 
(305
)
Tax-exempt investment securities
 
40

 
(55
)
 
(15
)
 
(163
)
 
(236
)
 
(399
)
Interest bearing deposits
 
(68
)
 
52

 
(16
)
 
(27
)
 
98

 
71

Total interest-earning assets
 
955

 
342

 
1,297

 
1,882

 
(275
)
 
1,607

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Interest expense:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Savings deposits
 

 

 

 
2

 

 
2

Super Now deposits
 
12

 
21

 
33

 
15

 
6

 
21

Money market deposits
 
31

 
66

 
97

 
99

 
143

 
242

Time deposits
 
(47
)
 
66

 
19

 
(68
)
 
147

 
79

Short-term borrowings
 
2

 
22

 
24

 
(2
)
 

 
(2
)
Long-term borrowings
 
(51
)
 
(39
)
 
(90
)
 
(176
)
 
(85
)
 
(261
)
Total interest-bearing liabilities
 
(53
)
 
136

 
83

 
(130
)
 
211

 
81

Change in net interest income
 
$
1,008

 
$
206

 
$
1,214

 
$
2,012

 
$
(486
)
 
$
1,526



Provision for Loan Losses

The provision for loan losses is based upon management’s quarterly review of the loan portfolio.  The purpose of the review is to assess loan quality, identify impaired loans, analyze delinquencies, ascertain loan growth, evaluate potential charge-offs and recoveries, and assess general economic conditions in the markets served.  An external independent loan review is also performed annually for the Banks.  Management remains committed to an aggressive program of problem loan identification and resolution.

The allowance for loan losses is determined by applying loss factors to outstanding loans by type, excluding loans for which a specific allowance has been determined.  Loss factors are based on management’s consideration of the nature of the portfolio segments, changes in mix and volume of the loan portfolio, and historical loan loss experience.  In addition, management considers industry standards and trends with respect to non-performing loans and its knowledge and experience with specific lending segments.

Although management believes it uses the best information available to make such determinations and that the allowance for loan losses is adequate at September 30, 2017, future adjustments could be necessary if circumstances or economic conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the initial determinations.  A downturn in the local economy, increased unemployment, and delays in receiving financial information from borrowers could result in increased levels of nonperforming assets, charge-offs, loan loss provisions, and reductions in income.  Additionally, as an integral part of the examination process, bank regulatory agencies periodically review the Banks' loan loss allowance.  The banking agencies could require the recognition of additions to the loan loss allowance based on their judgment of information available to them at the time of their examination.

When determining the appropriate allowance level, management has attributed the allowance for loan losses to various portfolio segments; however, the allowance is available for the entire portfolio as needed.

The allowance for loan losses increased from $12,896,000 at December 31, 2016 to $12,933,000 at September 30, 2017.  The increase in the allowance for loan losses was driven by growth in the loan portfolio. In addition, the increase was limited due to the payoff of a large commercial loan that had a significant specific allocation within the allowance for loan losses. The majority of the loans charged-off had a specific allowance within the allowance for losses.  At September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016, the allowance for loan losses to total loans was 1.09% and 1.18%, respectively.


39

Table of Contents


The provision for loan losses totaled $60,000 and $258,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 and $605,000 and $866,000 for the nine months ended September 30 2017 and 2016, respectively.  The amount of the provision for loan losses was primarily the result of loan growth offset by minimal net charge-offs.

Nonperforming loans decreased to $8,317,000 at September 30, 2017 from $11,530,000 at September 30, 2016.  The majority of nonperforming loans are centered on loans that are either in a secured position and have sureties with a strong underlying financial position or have a specific allocation for any impairment recorded within the allowance for loan losses. The ratio of nonperforming loans to total loans was 0.70% and 1.08% at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans was 155.50% and 110.30% at September 30, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Internal loan review and analysis coupled with loan growth dictated a provision for loan losses of $605,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.   

The following is a table showing total nonperforming loans as of:

 
 
Total Nonperforming Loans
(In Thousands)
 
90 Days Past Due

Non-accrual

Total
September 30, 2017
 
$
261

 
$
8,056

 
$
8,317

June 30, 2017
 
1,329

 
11,169

 
12,498

March 31, 2017
 
141

 
10,730

 
10,871

December 31, 2016
 
870

 
10,756

 
11,626

September 30, 2016
 
114

 
11,416

 
11,530

 
Non-interest Income

Total non-interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 decreased $342,000 to $2,740,000.  Excluding net securities gains, non-interest income for the three months ended September 30, 2017 decreased $379,000 compared to the same period in 2016.  The decrease in gain on sale of loans was driven by a shift in product mix and decreased volume. The changes in insurance and brokerage commissions are due to a change in the product mix of consumer purchases. Debit card fees decreased due to decreased usage of debit cards.

Total non-interest income for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 decreased $1,102,000. Excluding net securities gains, non-interest income decreased $359,000 compared the 2016 period. The reasons noted for the three month period comparison also apply to the nine month period.

Non-interest income composition for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
September 30, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Service charges
 
$
550

 
20.07
 %
 
$
585

 
18.98
%
 
$
(35
)
 
(5.98
)%
Net securities gains, available for sale
 
302

 
11.02

 
253

 
8.21

 
49

 
19.37

Net securities (losses) gains, trading
 
(4
)
 
(0.15
)
 
8

 
0.26

 
(12
)
 
(150.00
)
Bank-owned life insurance
 
166

 
6.06

 
172

 
5.58

 
(6
)
 
(3.49
)
Gain on sale of loans
 
455

 
16.61

 
658

 
21.35

 
(203
)
 
(30.85
)
Insurance commissions
 
109

 
3.98

 
198

 
6.42

 
(89
)
 
(44.95
)
Brokerage commissions
 
352

 
12.85

 
290

 
9.41

 
62

 
21.38

Debit card fees
 
514

 
18.76

 
690

 
22.39

 
(176
)
 
(25.51
)
Other
 
296

 
10.80

 
228

 
7.40

 
68

 
29.82

Total non-interest income
 
$
2,740

 
100.00
 %
 
$
3,082

 
100.00
%
 
$
(342
)
 
(11.10
)%

40

Table of Contents


 
 
Nine Months Ended
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
September 30, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Service charges
 
$
1,637

 
20.07
 %
 
$
1,678

 
18.13
%
 
$
(41
)
 
(2.44
)%
Net securities gains, available for sale
 
487

 
5.97

 
1,174

 
12.68

 
(687
)
 
(58.52
)
Net securities (losses) gains, trading
 
(2
)
 
(0.02
)
 
54

 
0.58

 
(56
)
 
(103.70
)
Bank-owned life insurance
 
499

 
6.12

 
516

 
5.57

 
(17
)
 
(3.29
)
Gain on sale of loans
 
1,316

 
16.14

 
1,691

 
18.27

 
(375
)
 
(22.18
)
Insurance commissions
 
399

 
4.89

 
604

 
6.52

 
(205
)
 
(33.94
)
Brokerage commissions
 
1,044

 
12.80

 
817

 
8.83

 
227

 
27.78

Debit card fees
 
1,450

 
17.78

 
1,413

 
15.26

 
37

 
2.62

Other
 
1,325

 
16.25

 
1,310

 
14.16

 
15

 
1.15

Total non-interest income
 
$
8,155

 
100.00
 %
 
$
9,257

 
100.00
%
 
$
(1,102
)
 
(11.90
)%

Non-interest Expense

Total non-interest expense increased $827,000 for the three months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period of 2016.  The increase in salaries and employee benefits is primarily attributable to routine wage increases coupled with an increase in the cost of health insurance.  Occupancy expense increased due to various maintenance projects to refresh facilities. Furniture and equipment expense increased as an acquired building was outfitted. Software amortization decreased as the number of vendors utilized is consolidated. Marketing expenses increased as targeted marketing was increased in the localities were branches will be opened in the next several months. Other non-interest expenses increased primarily due to legal expenses and a reduction in the amortization of investment in limited partnerships as several of the partnerships have reached the end of their tax credit generating life and have been fully amortized.

Total non-interest expense for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same period in 2016 increased $1,149,000. The reasons noted for the three month period comparison also apply to the nine month period.

Non-interest expense composition for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
 
 
 
Three Months Ended
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
September 30, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Salaries and employee benefits
 
$
4,738

 
49.53
%
 
$
4,507

 
51.57
%
 
$
231

 
5.13
 %
Occupancy
 
603

 
6.30

 
544

 
6.22

 
59

 
10.85

Furniture and equipment
 
816

 
8.53

 
662

 
7.58

 
154

 
23.26

Software amortization
 
235

 
2.46

 
580

 
6.64

 
(345
)
 
(59.48
)
Pennsylvania shares tax
 
228

 
2.38

 
220

 
2.52

 
8

 
3.64

Professional fees
 
560

 
5.85

 
502

 
5.74

 
58

 
11.55

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance
 
194

 
2.03

 
202

 
2.31

 
(8
)
 
(3.96
)
Debit card expenses
 
168

 
1.76

 
246

 
2.81

 
(78
)
 
(31.71
)
Marketing
 
315

 
3.29

 
173

 
1.98

 
142

 
82.08

Intangible amortization
 
81

 
0.85

 
90

 
1.03

 
(9
)
 
(10.00
)
Other
 
1,628

 
17.02

 
1,013

 
11.60

 
615

 
60.71

Total non-interest expense
 
$
9,566

 
100.00
%
 
$
8,739

 
100.00
%
 
$
827

 
9.46
 %

41

Table of Contents


 
 
Nine Months Ended
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
September 30, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Salaries and employee benefits
 
$
14,116

 
51.11
%
 
$
13,433

 
50.76
%
 
$
683

 
5.08
 %
Occupancy
 
1,855

 
6.72

 
1,630

 
6.16

 
225

 
13.80

Furniture and equipment
 
2,129

 
7.71

 
2,042

 
7.72

 
87

 
4.26

Software amortization
 
750

 
2.72

 
950

 
3.59

 
(200
)
 
(21.05
)
Pennsylvania shares tax
 
696

 
2.52

 
698

 
2.64

 
(2
)
 
(0.29
)
Professional fees
 
1,816

 
6.58

 
1,512

 
5.71

 
304

 
20.11

Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation deposit insurance
 
514

 
1.86

 
670

 
2.53

 
(156
)
 
(23.28
)
Debit card expenses
 
478

 
1.73

 
456

 
1.72

 
22

 
4.82

Marketing
 
690

 
2.50

 
568

 
2.15

 
122

 
21.48

Intangible amortization
 
256

 
0.93

 
276

 
1.04

 
(20
)
 
(7.25
)
Other
 
4,314

 
15.62

 
4,230

 
15.98

 
84

 
1.99

Total non-interest expense
 
$
27,614

 
100.00
%
 
$
26,465

 
100.00
%
 
$
1,149

 
4.34
 %

Provision for Income Taxes

Income taxes increased $9,000 and $184,000 for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to the same periods of 2016.  The effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was 29.39% and 25.76% compared to 2.15% and 20.58% for the same periods of 2016. The primary cause of the increase in tax expense for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 compared to 2016 is the impact of a reduction of tax-exempt interest income within the investment portfolio as the portfolio was strategically reduced and a reduction in the amount of federal tax credits recognized from low income elderly housing partnerships. Excluding the impact of securities gains and losses, the effective tax rate for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 was 27.66% and 27.57% compared to 29.08% and 24.89% for the same periods of 2016.  The Company currently is in a deferred tax asset position.  Management has reviewed the deferred tax asset and has determined that the asset will be utilized within the appropriate carry forward period and therefore does not require a valuation allowance.

ASSET/LIABILITY MANAGEMENT

Cash and Cash Equivalents

Cash and cash equivalents decreased $15,924,000 from $43,671,000 at December 31, 2016 to $27,747,000 at September 30, 2017 primarily as a result of the following activities during the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Loans Held for Sale

Activity regarding loans held for sale resulted in sales proceeds leading loan originations, less $1,316,000 in realized gains, by $219,000 for the nine months ended September 30, 2017.

Loans

Gross loans increased $96,033,000 since December 31, 2016 due primarily to an increase in installment loans to individuals. The growth in installment loans was driven by automobile indirect lending. Loan growth has also picked up in our commercial, financial, and agricultural loan products.

42

Table of Contents



The allocation of the loan portfolio, by category, as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 is presented below:
 
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
175,299

 
14.73
 %
 
$
146,110

 
13.36
 %
 
$
29,189

 
19.98
 %
Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
576,134

 
48.43

 
564,740

 
51.63

 
11,394

 
2.02
 %
Commercial
 
323,510

 
27.19

 
306,182

 
27.99

 
17,328

 
5.66
 %
Construction
 
29,352

 
2.47

 
34,650

 
3.17

 
(5,298
)
 
(15.29
)%
Installment loans to individuals
 
86,639

 
7.28

 
43,256

 
3.96

 
43,383

 
100.29
 %
Net deferred loan fees and discounts
 
(1,220
)
 
(0.10
)
 
(1,257
)
 
(0.11
)
 
37

 
(2.94
)%
Gross loans
 
$
1,189,714

 
100.00
 %
 
$
1,093,681

 
100.00
 %
 
$
96,033

 
8.78
 %
 
The following table shows the amount of accrual and non-accrual TDRs at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016:
 
 
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Accrual
 
Non-accrual
 
Total
 
Accrual
 
Non-accrual
 
Total
Commercial, financial, and agricultural
 
$
22

 
$
120

 
$
142

 
$
109

 
$
132

 
$
241

Real estate mortgage:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Residential
 
1,199

 
341

 
1,540

 
1,491

 
541

 
2,032

Commercial
 
4,495

 
2,252

 
6,747

 
4,723

 
2,184

 
6,907

 
 
$
5,716

 
$
2,713

 
$
8,429

 
$
6,323

 
$
2,857

 
$
9,180

 
Investments

The fair value of the investment securities portfolio at September 30, 2017 decreased $1,027,000 since December 31, 2016 while the amortized cost of the portfolio decreased $2,095,000.  The portfolio continues to be actively managed in order to reduce interest rate and market risk. This is being undertaken primarily through the sale of long-term municipal bonds that have a maturity date of 2025 or later and securities with a call date within the next five years.  The proceeds of the bond sales are being deployed into loans and intermediate term corporate bonds and short and intermediate term municipal bonds.  The strategy to sell a portion of the long-term bond portfolio does negatively impact current earnings, but this action plays a key role in our long-term asset liability management strategy as the balance sheet is shortened in anticipation of a steadily rising rate environment. The unrealized losses within the debt securities portfolio are the result of market activity, not credit issues/ratings, as approximately 87.34% of the debt securities portfolio on an amortized cost basis is currently rated A or higher by either S&P or Moody’s.

The Company considers various factors, which include examples from applicable accounting guidance, when analyzing the available for sale portfolio for possible other than temporary impairment.  The Company primarily considers the following factors in its analysis: length of time and severity of the fair value being less than carrying value; reduction of dividend paid (equities); continued payment of dividend/interest, credit rating, and financial condition of an issuer; intent and ability to hold until anticipated recovery (which may be maturity); and general outlook for the economy, specific industry, and entity in question.

The bond portion of the portfolio review is conducted with emphases on several factors.  Continued payment of principal and interest is given primary importance with credit rating and financial condition of the issuer following as the next most important.  Credit ratings were reviewed with the ratings of the bonds being satisfactory.  Bonds that were not currently rated were discussed with a third party and/or underwent an internal financial review.  The Company also monitors whether each of the investments incurred a decline in fair value from carrying value of at least 20% for twelve consecutive months or a similar decline of at least 50% for three consecutive months.  Each bond is reviewed to determine whether it is a general obligation bond, which is backed by the credit and taxing power of the issuing jurisdiction, or revenue bond, which is only payable from specified revenues.  Based on the review undertaken by the Company, the Company determined that the decline in value of the various bond holdings were temporary and were the result of the general market downturns and interest rate/yield curve changes, not credit issues.  The fact that almost all of such bonds are general obligation bonds further solidified the Company’s determination that the decline in the value of these bond holdings is temporary.


43

Table of Contents


The fair value of the equity portfolio continues to fluctuate as the economic and political environment continues to impact stock pricing.  The amortized cost of the available for sale equity securities portfolio has increased $1,604,000 to $12,837,000 at September 30, 2017 from $11,233,000 at December 31, 2016 while the fair value increased $1,465,000 over the same time period.

The equity portion of the portfolio is reviewed for possible other than temporary impairment in a similar manner to the bond portfolio with greater emphasis placed on the length of time the fair value has been less than the carrying value and financial sector outlook.  The Company also reviews dividend payment activities.  The starting point for the equity analysis is the length and severity of a market price decline.  The Company monitors two primary measures: 20% decline in fair value from carrying value for twelve consecutive months and 50% decline for three consecutive months.

The distribution of credit ratings by amortized cost and fair values for the debt security portfolio at September 30, 2017 follows:
 
 
 
A- to AAA
 
B- to BBB+
 
Not Rated
 
Total
(In Thousands)
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
 
Amortized Cost
 
Fair Value
Available for sale (AFS):
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Mortgage-backed securities
 
$
4,544

 
$
4,530

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$

 
$
4,544

 
$
4,530

State and political securities
 
61,293

 
61,751

 

 

 
575

 
576

 
61,868

 
62,327

Other debt securities
 
38,422

 
37,917

 
13,478

 
13,059

 
1,054

 
997

 
52,954

 
51,973

Total debt securities AFS
 
$
104,259

 
$
104,198

 
$
13,478

 
$
13,059

 
$
1,629

 
$
1,573

 
$
119,366

 
$
118,830

 
Financing Activities

Deposits

Total deposits increased $58,782,000 from December 31, 2016 to September 30, 2017.  The growth was led by an increase in money market and NOW deposit accounts from December 31, 2016 to September 30, 2017 of $29,407,000 and $29,091,000, respectively.  The increase in core deposits (deposits less time deposits) has provided relationship driven funding for the loan and investment portfolios. While deposit gathering efforts have centered on core deposits, the lengthening of the time deposit portfolio is moving forward as part of the strategy to build balance sheet protection in a rising rate environment. The increase in deposits is the result of our focus on building relationships, not by offering market leading rates. 

Deposit balances and their changes for the periods being discussed follow:

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Demand deposits
 
$
310,830

 
26.94
%
 
$
303,277

 
27.69
%
 
$
7,553

 
2.49
 %
NOW accounts
 
203,744

 
17.66

 
174,653

 
15.95

 
29,091

 
16.66

Money market deposits
 
274,528

 
23.79

 
245,121

 
22.38

 
29,407

 
12.00

Savings deposits
 
156,437

 
13.56

 
153,788

 
14.04

 
2,649

 
1.72

Time deposits
 
208,457

 
18.05

 
218,375

 
19.94

 
(9,918
)
 
(4.54
)
 Total deposits
 
$
1,153,996

 
100.00
%
 
$
1,095,214

 
100.00
%
 
$
58,782

 
5.37
 %
 













44

Table of Contents


Borrowed Funds

Total borrowed funds decreased 23.53%, or $23,355,000, to $122,594,000 at September 30, 2017 compared to $99,239,000 at December 31, 2016.  The reduction in long-term borrowings was the result of a maturity. The increase in short-term borrowed funds supplemented deposit growth in the funding of the loan portfolio growth with overnight borrowings from the FHLB being the primary source of short-term borrowings. The decline in securities sold under agreement to repurchase is due to the phasing out of a product the bank offers.

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
 
Change
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
% Total
 
Amount
 
%
Short-term borrowings:
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

FHLB repurchase agreements
 
$
32,434

 
26.46
%
 
$

 
%
 
$
32,434

 
 %
Securities sold under agreement to repurchase
 
9,162

 
7.47

 
13,241

 
13.34

 
(4,079
)
 
(30.81
)
Total short-term borrowings
 
41,596

 
33.93

 
13,241

 
13.34

 
28,355

 
214.15

Long-term borrowings:
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Long-term FHLB borrowings
 
80,625

 
65.77

 
85,625

 
86.28

 
(5,000
)
 
(5.84
)
Long-term capital lease
 
373

 
0.30

 
373

 
0.38

 

 

Total long-term borrowings
 
80,998

 
66.07

 
85,998

 
86.66

 
(5,000
)
 
(5.81
)
Total borrowed funds
 
$
122,594

 
100.00
%
 
$
99,239

 
100.00
%
 
$
23,355

 
23.53
 %

Short-Term Borrowings

The following table provides further information in regards to secured borrowings that have been accounted for as repurchase agreements.

 
 
Remaining Contractual Maturity Overnight and Continuous
(In Thousands)
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
Mortgage-backed and state and political securities pledged, fair value
 
$
13,884

 
$
15,574

Repurchase agreements
 
9,162

 
13,241


Capital

The adequacy of the Company’s capital is reviewed on an ongoing basis with reference to the size, composition, and quality of the Company’s resources and regulatory guidelines.  Management seeks to maintain a level of capital sufficient to support existing assets and anticipated asset growth, maintain favorable access to capital markets, and preserve high quality credit ratings.

Bank holding companies are required to comply with the Federal Reserve Board’s risk-based capital guidelines.  The risk-based capital rules are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to differences in risk profiles among banks and bank holding companies and to minimize disincentives for holding liquid assets.  Specifically, each is required to maintain certain minimum dollar amounts and ratios of common equity tier I risk-based, tier I risk-based, total risk-based, and tier I leverage capital. In addition to the capital requirements, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvements Act (FDICIA) established five capital categories ranging from “well capitalized” to “critically undercapitalized.” To be classified as “well capitalized”, common equity tier I risk-based, tier I risked-based, total risk-based, and tier I leverage capital ratios must be at least 6.5%, 8%, 10%, and 5%, respectively.











45

Table of Contents


The Company's capital ratios as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
126,491

 
11.781
%
 
$
125,804

 
12.620
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
48,316

 
4.500

 
44,849

 
4.500

Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
 
61,737

 
5.750

 
51,078

 
5.125

To Be Well Capitalized
 
69,790

 
6.500

 
64,782

 
6.500

Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
128,801

 
11.996
%
 
$
133,393

 
13.380
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
85,896

 
8.000

 
79,732

 
8.000

Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
 
99,317

 
9.250

 
85,961

 
8.625

To Be Well Capitalized
 
107,370

 
10.000

 
99,665

 
10.000

Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
126,491

 
11.781
%
 
$
125,804

 
12.620
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
64,421

 
6.000

 
59,799

 
6.000

Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
 
77,842

 
7.250

 
66,028

 
6.625

To Be Well Capitalized
 
85,895

 
8.000

 
79,732

 
8.000

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
126,491

 
9.074
%
 
$
125,804

 
9.432
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
55,760

 
4.000

 
53,352

 
4.000

To Be Well Capitalized
 
69,700

 
5.000

 
66,691

 
5.000

 
Jersey Shore State Bank's capital ratios as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
88,724

 
10.603
%
 
$
86,397

 
11.136
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
37,655

 
4.500

 
34,914

 
4.500

Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
 
48,115

 
5.750

 
39,763

 
5.125

To Be Well Capitalized
 
54,391

 
6.500

 
50,431

 
6.500

Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
89,351

 
10.678
%
 
$
90,992

 
11.728
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
66,942

 
8.000

 
62,069

 
8.000

Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
 
77,402

 
9.250

 
66,918

 
8.625

To Be Well Capitalized
 
83,678

 
10.000

 
77,587

 
10.000

Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
-

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
88,724

 
10.603
%
 
$
86,397

 
11.136
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
50,207

 
6.000

 
46,552

 
6.000

Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
 
60,667

 
7.250

 
51,401

 
6.625

To Be Well Capitalized
 
66,943

 
8.000

 
62,069

 
8.000

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
88,724

 
8.556
%
 
$
86,397

 
8.894
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
41,479

 
4.000

 
38,856

 
4.000

To Be Well Capitalized
 
51,849

 
5.000

 
48,570

 
5.000






46

Table of Contents


Luzerne Bank's capital ratios as of September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016 were as follows:

 
 
September 30, 2017
 
December 31, 2016
(In Thousands)
 
Amount
 
Ratio
 
Amount
 
Ratio
Common Equity Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
31,619

 
9.916
%
 
$
31,102

 
10.165
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
14,349

 
4.500

 
13,769

 
4.500

Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
 
18,335

 
5.750

 
15,682

 
5.125

To Be Well Capitalized
 
20,726

 
6.500

 
19,889

 
6.500

Total Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
33,011

 
10.353
%
 
$
33,589

 
10.977
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
25,508

 
8.000

 
24,479

 
8.000

Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
 
29,494

 
9.250

 
26,391

 
8.625

To Be Well Capitalized
 
31,885

 
10.000

 
30,599

 
10.000

Tier I Capital (to Risk-weighted Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
31,619

 
9.916
%
 
$
31,102

 
10.165
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
19,132

 
6.000

 
18,359

 
6.000

Minimum To Maintain Capital Conservation Buffer At Reporting Date
 
23,118

 
7.250

 
20,272

 
6.625

To Be Well Capitalized
 
25,509

 
8.000

 
24,479

 
8.000

Tier I Capital (to Average Assets)
 
 

 
 

 
 

 
 

Actual
 
$
31,619

 
8.703
%
 
$
31,102

 
8.535
%
For Capital Adequacy Purposes
 
14,532

 
4.000

 
14,576

 
4.000

To Be Well Capitalized
 
18,166

 
5.000

 
18,220

 
5.000


In July 2013, the federal bank regulatory agencies adopted revisions to the agencies’ capital adequacy guidelines and prompt corrective action rules, which were designed to enhance such requirements and implement the revised standards of the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, commonly referred to as Basel III.  The July 2013 final rules generally implement higher minimum capital requirements, add a new common equity tier 1 capital requirement, and establish criteria that instruments must meet to be considered common equity tier 1 capital, additional tier 1 capital or tier 2 capital.  The new minimum capital to risk-adjusted assets requirements are a common equity tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% (6.5% to be considered “well capitalized”) and a tier 1 capital ratio of 6.0%, increased from 4.0% (and increased from 6.0% to 8.0% to be considered “well capitalized”); the total capital ratio remains at 8.0% under the new rules (10.0% to be considered “well capitalized”).  Under the new rules, in order to avoid limitations on capital distributions (including dividend payments and certain discretionary bonus payments to executive officers), a banking organization must hold a capital conservation buffer comprised of common equity tier 1 capital above its minimum risk-based capital requirements in an amount greater than 2.5% of total risk-weighted assets.  The new minimum capital requirements were effective beginning on January 1, 2015.  The capital contribution buffer requirements phase in over a three-year period beginning January 1, 2016. The Company and the Banks will continue to analyze these new rules and their effects on the business, operations and capital levels of the Company and the Banks.

Liquidity; Interest Rate Sensitivity and Market Risk

The asset/liability committee addresses the liquidity needs of the Company to ensure that sufficient funds are available to meet credit demands and deposit withdrawals as well as to the placement of available funds in the investment portfolio.  In assessing liquidity requirements, equal consideration is given to the current position as well as the future outlook.

The following liquidity measures are monitored for compliance and were within the limits cited, except for net loans to total deposits, at September 30, 2017:

1.            Net Loans to Total Assets, 85% maximum
2.              Net Loans to Total Deposits, 100% maximum
3.              Cumulative 90 day Maturity GAP %, +/- 20% maximum
4.              Cumulative 1 Year Maturity GAP %, +/- 25% maximum



47

Table of Contents


Fundamental objectives of the Company’s asset/liability management process are to maintain adequate liquidity while minimizing interest rate risk.  The maintenance of adequate liquidity provides the Company with the ability to meet its financial obligations to depositors, loan customers, and shareholders.  Additionally, it provides funds for normal operating expenditures and business opportunities as they arise.  The objective of interest rate sensitivity management is to increase net interest income by managing interest sensitive assets and liabilities in such a way that they can be repriced in response to changes in market interest rates.

The Banks, like other financial institutions, must have sufficient funds available to meet liquidity needs for deposit withdrawals, loan commitments and originations, and expenses.  In order to control cash flow, the Banks estimate future cash flows from deposits, loan payments, and investment security payments.  The primary sources of funds are deposits, principal and interest payments on loans and investment securities, FHLB borrowings, and brokered deposits.  Management believes the Banks have adequate resources to meet their normal funding requirements.

Management monitors the Company’s liquidity on both a long and short-term basis, thereby providing management necessary information to react to current balance sheet trends.  Cash flow needs are assessed and sources of funds are determined.  Funding strategies consider both customer needs and economical cost.  Both short and long-term funding needs are addressed by maturities and sales of available for sale and trading investment securities, loan repayments and maturities, and liquidating money market investments such as federal funds sold.  The use of these resources, in conjunction with access to credit provides core funding to satisfy depositor, borrower, and creditor needs.

Management monitors and determines the desirable level of liquidity.  Consideration is given to loan demand, investment opportunities, deposit pricing and growth potential, as well as the current cost of borrowing funds.  The Company has a total current maximum borrowing capacity at the FHLB of $438,674,000.  In addition to this credit arrangement, the Company has additional lines of credit with correspondent banks of $52,000,000.  Management believes it has sufficient liquidity to satisfy estimated short-term and long-term funding needs.  FHLB borrowings totaled $113,059,000 as of September 30, 2017.

Interest rate sensitivity, which is closely related to liquidity management, is a function of the repricing characteristics of the Company’s portfolio of assets and liabilities.  Asset/liability management strives to match maturities and rates between loan and investment security assets with the deposit liabilities and borrowings that fund them.  Successful asset/liability management results in a balance sheet structure which can cope effectively with market rate fluctuations. The matching process by segments both assets and liabilities into future time periods (usually 12 months, or less) based upon when repricing can be effected.  Repriceable assets are subtracted from repriceable liabilities, for a specific time period to determine the “gap”, or difference. Once known, the gap is managed based on predictions about future market interest rates.  Intentional mismatching, or gapping, can enhance net interest income if market rates move as predicted.  However, if market rates behave in a manner contrary to predictions, net interest income will suffer.  Gaps, therefore, contain an element of risk and must be prudently managed.  In addition to gap management, the Company has an asset/liability management policy which incorporates a market value at risk calculation which is used to determine the effects of interest rate movements on shareholders’ equity and a simulation analysis to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet.

The Company currently maintains a GAP position of being asset sensitive.  The Company has strategically taken this position as it has decreased the duration of the earning asset portfolio by adding quality short and intermediate term loans such as home equity loans and the selling of long-term municipal bonds.  Lengthening of the liability portfolio is being undertaken to build protection in a rising rate environment.

A market value at risk calculation is utilized to monitor the effects of interest rate changes on the Company’s balance sheet and more specifically shareholders’ equity.  The Company does not manage the balance sheet structure in order to maintain compliance with this calculation.  The calculation serves as a guideline with greater emphases placed on interest rate sensitivity.  Changes to calculation results from period to period are reviewed as changes in results could be a signal of future events.  As of the most recent analysis, the results of the market value at risk calculation were within established guidelines due to the strategic direction being taken.











48

Table of Contents


Interest Rate Sensitivity

In this analysis the Company examines the result of a 100, 200, 300, and 400 basis point change in market interest rates and the effect on net interest income. It is assumed that the change is instantaneous and that all rates move in a parallel manner.  Assumptions are also made concerning prepayment speeds on mortgage loans and mortgage securities.

The following is a rate shock forecast for the twelve month period ending September 30, 2018 assuming a static balance sheet as of September 30, 2017.

 
 
Parallel Rate Shock in Basis Points
(In Thousands)
 
-200
 
-100
 
Static
 
+100
 
+200
 
+300
 
+400
Net interest income
 
$
41,960

 
$
44,460

 
$
46,574

 
$
48,284

 
$
49,787

 
$
51,179

 
$
52,592

Change from static
 
(4,614
)
 
(2,114
)
 

 
1,710

 
3,213

 
4,605

 
6,018

Percent change from static
 
-9.91
 %
 
-4.54
 %
 

 
3.67
%
 
6.90
%
 
9.89
%
 
12.92
%
 
The model utilized to create the report presented above makes various estimates at each level of interest rate change regarding cash flow from principal repayment on loans and mortgage-backed securities and/or call activity on investment securities.  Actual results could differ significantly from these estimates which would result in significant differences in the calculated projected change.  In addition, the limits stated above do not necessarily represent the level of change under which management would undertake specific measures to realign its portfolio in order to reduce the projected level of change.  Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond expeditiously when the market interest rate outlook changes.

Inflation

The asset and liability structure of a financial institution is primarily monetary in nature.  Therefore, interest rates rather than inflation have a more significant impact on the Company’s performance.  Interest rates are not always affected in the same direction or magnitude as prices of other goods and services, but are reflective of fiscal policy initiatives or economic factors which are not measured by a price index.
 
Item 3.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

Market risk for the Company is comprised primarily of interest rate risk exposure and liquidity risk.  Interest rate risk and liquidity risk management is performed at both the level of the Company and the Banks.  The Company’s interest rate sensitivity is monitored by management through selected interest rate risk measures produced by an independent third party.  There have been no substantial changes in the Company’s gap analysis or simulation analysis compared to the information provided in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the period ended December 31, 2016.  Additional information and details are provided in the “Liquidity, Interest Rate Sensitivity, and Market Risk” section of “Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations.”

Generally, management believes the Company is well positioned to respond in a timely manner when the market interest rate outlook changes.

Item 4.  Controls and Procedures

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

An analysis was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s management, including the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of September 30, 2017.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the quarter ended September 30, 2017, that materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

49

Table of Contents


Part II.  OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1.                           Legal Proceedings
 
None.

Item 1A.  Risk Factors
 
There are no material changes to the risk factors set forth in Part I, Item 1A, “Risk Factors,” of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2016.  Please refer to that section for disclosures regarding the risks and uncertainties related to the Company’s business.

Item 2.                           Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

The following table provides certain information with respect to the Company's repurchase of common stock during the quarter ended September 30, 2017.
Period
 
Total
Number of
Shares (or
Units) Purchased
 
Average
Price Paid
per Share
(or Units) Purchased
 
Total Number of
Shares (or Units)
Purchased as Part of
Publicly Announced Plans or Programs
 
Maximum Number (or
Approximate Dollar Value)
of Shares (or Units) that
May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
Month #1 (July 1 - July 31, 2017)
 

 

 

 
342,446

Month #2 (August 1 - August 31, 2017)
 

 

 

 
342,446

Month #3 (September 1 - September 30, 2017)
 

 

 

 
342,446

 
On April 24, 2017, the Board of Directors extended the previously approved authorization to repurchase up to 482,000 shares, or approximately 10%, of the outstanding shares of the Company for an additional year to April 30, 2018.  As of September 30, 2017 there have been 91,856 shares repurchased under this plan.

Item 3.                           Defaults Upon Senior Securities
 
None.
 
Item 4.                           Mine Safety Disclosures
 
Not applicable.
 
Item 5.                           Other Information
 
None.
 

50

Table of Contents


Item 6.                           Exhibits
 
 
Articles of Incorporation of the Registrant, as presently in effect (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(i) of the Registrant’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q for the period ended March 31, 2012).
 
Bylaws of the Registrant (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3(ii) of the Registrant’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2011).
 
Employment Agreement, dated October 30, 2017, by and between Penns Woods Bancorp, Inc. and Brian L. Knepp (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10 (i) of the Registrant's Current Report on Form 8-K filed on November 2, 2017).
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer.
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer.
101
 
Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

51

Table of Contents


SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
 
 
 
PENNS WOODS BANCORP, INC.
 
 
(Registrant)
 
 
 
Date:    
November 8, 2017
/s/ Richard A. Grafmyre
 
 
Richard A. Grafmyre, Chief Executive Officer
 
 
(Principal Executive Officer)
 
 
 
 
 
 
Date:
November 8, 2017
/s/ Brian L. Knepp
 
 
Brian L. Knepp, President and Chief Financial Officer
 
 
(Principal Financial Officer and Principal Accounting
 
 
Officer)

52

Table of Contents


EXHIBIT INDEX
 
Exhibit 31(i)
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 31(ii)
 
Rule 13a-14(a)/Rule 15d-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 32(i)
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Executive Officer
Exhibit 32(ii)
 
Section 1350 Certification of Chief Financial Officer
Exhibit 101
 
Interactive data file containing the following financial statements formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheet at September 30, 2017 and December 31, 2016; (ii) the Consolidated Statement of Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; (iii) Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Shareholders’ Equity for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; (v) the Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30, 2017 and 2016; and (vi) the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements. As provided in Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, this interactive data file shall not be deemed to be “filed” for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, and shall not be deemed “filed” or part of any registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Section 11 or 12 under the Securities Act of 1933, or otherwise subject to liability under those sections.

53