PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC - Quarter Report: 2005 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|||||||
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
|||||||
FORM
10-Q
|
|||||||
[
X
] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||||||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||||||
For
the quarterly period ended: September
30, 2005
|
|||||||
OR
|
|||||||
[
]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||||||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||||||
For
the transition period from __________ to __________
|
|||||||
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
|
|||||||
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|||||||
North
Carolina
|
|||||||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|||||||
000-27205
|
56-2132396
|
||||||
(Commission
File No.)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
||||||
518
West C Street, Newton, North Carolina
|
28658
|
||||||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
||||||
(828)
464-5620
|
|||||||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
|||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
|||||||
Yes
|
X
|
No
|
|||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is an accelerated filer (as
defined
in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
|||||||
Yes
|
No
|
X
|
|||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
|||||||
Yes
|
No
|
X
|
|||||
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes
of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
3,444,018
shares of common stock, outstanding at November 10,
2005.
|
INDEX
|
||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
PAGE(S)
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at September 30, 2005 (Unaudited) and December 31,
|
||
2004
|
3
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings for the three months ended September 30,
2005 and
2004
|
||
(Unaudited),
and for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
(Unaudited)
|
4
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months ended September
30, 2005
|
||
and
2004 (Unaudited), and for the nine months ended September 30,
2005
and 2004 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended September 30,
2005 and
|
||
2004
(Unaudited)
|
6-7
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
8-12
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
13-21
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
22
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
23
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
24
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
24
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
24
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
24
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
24
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
24-25
|
Signatures
|
26
|
|
Certifications
|
27-29
|
Statements
made in this Form 10-Q, other than those concerning historical information,
should be considered forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities
Litigation Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of management
and on
the information available to management at the time that this Form 10-Q was
prepared. These statements can be identified by the use of words like
“expect,”“anticipate,”“estimate,” and “believe,” variations of these words and
other similar expressions. Readers should not place undue reliance on
forward-looking statements as a number of important factors could cause actual
results to differ materially from those in the forward-looking statements.
Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially include, but
are
not limited to, (1) competition in the markets served by Peoples Bank, (2)
changes in the interest rate environment, (3) general national, regional
or
local economic conditions may be less favorable than expected, resulting
in,
among other things, a deterioration in credit quality and the possible
impairment of collectibility of loans, (4) legislative or regulatory changes,
including changes in accounting standards, (5) significant changes in the
federal and state legal and regulatory environments and tax laws, (6) the
impact
of changes in monetary and fiscal policies, laws, rules and regulations and
(7)
other risks and factors identified in the Company’s other filings with the
Securities and Exchange Commission, including but not limited to those described
in Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K for the
year ended December 31, 2004.
2
PART
I.
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
Item
1.
Financial
Statements
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|||||||
September
30,
|
|
December
31,
|
|||||
Assets
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
|
|||
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
21,963,019
|
15,067,871
|
||||
Federal
funds sold
|
4,648,000
|
1,723,000
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
26,611,019
|
16,790,871
|
|||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
110,805,224
|
105,598,106
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
6,345,749
|
5,396,959
|
|||||
Total
securities
|
117,150,973
|
110,995,065
|
|||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
4,170,230
|
3,783,175
|
|||||
Loans
|
560,470,788
|
535,467,733
|
|||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(7,334,831
|
)
|
(8,048,627
|
)
|
|||
Net
loans
|
553,135,957
|
527,419,106
|
|||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
12,742,958
|
12,742,730
|
|||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
6,257,365
|
6,034,188
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable and other assets
|
9,120,965
|
8,582,937
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
729,189,467
|
686,348,072
|
||||
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
|||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||
Non-interest
bearing demand
|
$
|
98,623,830
|
78,024,194
|
||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings
|
186,139,961
|
193,917,507
|
|||||
Time,
$100,000 or more
|
158,488,890
|
154,300,926
|
|||||
Other
time
|
144,306,091
|
130,279,446
|
|||||
Total
deposits
|
587,558,772
|
556,522,073
|
|||||
Demand
notes payable to U.S. Treasury
|
1,600,000
|
1,184,392
|
|||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
67,000,000
|
59,000,000
|
|||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
14,433,000
|
14,433,000
|
|||||
Accrued
interest payable and other liabilities
|
4,512,811
|
4,270,755
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
675,104,583
|
635,410,220
|
|||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value; authorized
|
|||||||
5,000,000
shares; no shares issued
|
|||||||
and
outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock, no par value; authorized
|
|||||||
20,000,000
shares; issued and
|
|||||||
outstanding
3,443,862 shares in 2005
|
|||||||
and
3,448,341 shares in 2004
|
41,178,332
|
35,040,390
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
13,429,870
|
16,018,206
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
(523,318
|
)
|
(120,744
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
54,084,884
|
50,937,852
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
729,189,467
|
686,348,072
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
3
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended
|
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
|
2004
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||
Interest
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
10,156,112
|
8,055,439
|
27,838,237
|
24,035,635
|
||||||||
Interest
on federal funds sold
|
35,041
|
16,473
|
37,946
|
25,900
|
|||||||||
Interest
on investment securities:
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies
|
893,602
|
796,006
|
2,596,159
|
2,078,090
|
|||||||||
States
and political subdivisions
|
181,479
|
170,673
|
543,974
|
483,527
|
|||||||||
Other
|
85,552
|
96,361
|
264,509
|
293,348
|
|||||||||
Total
interest income
|
11,351,786
|
9,134,952
|
31,280,825
|
26,916,500
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
|||||||||||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings deposits
|
647,734
|
540,620
|
1,923,016
|
1,316,725
|
|||||||||
Time
deposits
|
2,363,754
|
1,746,693
|
6,254,678
|
5,421,336
|
|||||||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
722,818
|
651,243
|
2,144,602
|
1,940,067
|
|||||||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
234,536
|
162,371
|
667,526
|
487,114
|
|||||||||
Other
|
8,763
|
2,465
|
19,874
|
5,624
|
|||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
3,977,605
|
3,103,392
|
11,009,696
|
9,170,866
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
7,374,181
|
6,031,560
|
20,271,129
|
17,745,634
|
|||||||||
Provision
for loans losses
|
930,000
|
931,000
|
2,343,000
|
2,658,000
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
6,444,181
|
5,100,560
|
17,928,129
|
15,087,634
|
|||||||||
Other
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Service
charges
|
988,294
|
907,946
|
2,740,863
|
2,592,301
|
|||||||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
308,185
|
140,778
|
823,677
|
467,808
|
|||||||||
Loss
on sale of securities
|
(139,727
|
)
|
-
|
(139,727
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Mortgage
banking income
|
133,543
|
97,707
|
338,299
|
254,488
|
|||||||||
Insurance
and brokerage commissions
|
87,006
|
82,622
|
299,526
|
338,825
|
|||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
417,837
|
320,020
|
1,212,324
|
926,412
|
|||||||||
Total
other income
|
1,795,138
|
1,549,073
|
5,274,962
|
4,579,834
|
|||||||||
Other
expense:
|
|||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
3,060,582
|
2,792,716
|
9,094,848
|
8,339,784
|
|||||||||
Occupancy
|
1,020,332
|
914,119
|
2,977,958
|
2,692,955
|
|||||||||
Other
|
1,306,732
|
1,283,584
|
3,874,376
|
3,550,637
|
|||||||||
Total
other expenses
|
5,387,646
|
4,990,419
|
15,947,182
|
14,583,376
|
|||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
2,851,673
|
1,659,214
|
7,255,909
|
5,084,092
|
|||||||||
Income
taxes
|
1,010,200
|
551,500
|
2,529,600
|
1,711,200
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
1,841,473
|
1,107,714
|
4,726,309
|
3,372,892
|
||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.53
|
0.32
|
1.37
|
0.97
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.52
|
0.32
|
1.35
|
0.96
|
||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per share
|
$
|
0.10
|
0.09
|
0.30
|
0.27
|
||||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
4
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
||||||||||||
2005
|
|
2004
|
2005
|
|
2004
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
1,841,473
|
1,107,714
|
4,726,309
|
3,372,892
|
||||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on securities
|
|||||||||||||
available
for sale
|
(317,691
|
)
|
2,451,591
|
(1,224,117
|
)
|
79,342
|
|||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||||||||
sales
of securities available for sale included
|
|||||||||||||
in
net earnings
|
139,727
|
-
|
139,727
|
-
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on derivative
|
|||||||||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
|||||||||||||
hedges
|
269,718
|
385,000
|
141,717
|
(330,000
|
)
|
||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses (gains) on
|
|||||||||||||
derivative
financial instruments qualifying as
|
|||||||||||||
cash
flow hedges included in net earnings
|
200,458
|
(2,005
|
)
|
283,256
|
(553,375
|
)
|
|||||||
Total
other comprehensive income (loss),
|
|||||||||||||
before
income taxes
|
292,212
|
2,834,586
|
(659,417
|
)
|
(804,033
|
)
|
|||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit) related to other
|
|||||||||||||
comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on securities
|
|||||||||||||
available
for sale
|
(123,741
|
)
|
954,895
|
(476,794
|
)
|
30,904
|
|||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||||||||
sales
of securities available for sale included
|
|||||||||||||
in
net earnings
|
54,424
|
-
|
54,424
|
-
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on derivative
|
|||||||||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
|||||||||||||
hedges
|
105,055
|
149,958
|
55,199
|
(128,535
|
)
|
||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses (gains) on
|
|||||||||||||
derivative
financial instruments qualifying as
|
|||||||||||||
cash
flow hedges included in net earnings
|
78,079
|
(781
|
)
|
110,328
|
(215,540
|
)
|
|||||||
Total
income tax expense (benefit) related to
|
|||||||||||||
other
comprehensive income
|
113,817
|
1,104,072
|
(256,843
|
)
|
(313,171
|
)
|
|||||||
Total
other comprehensive income (loss),
|
|||||||||||||
net
of tax
|
178,395
|
1,730,514
|
(402,574
|
)
|
(490,862
|
)
|
|||||||
Total
comprehensive income (loss)
|
$
|
2,019,868
|
2,838,228
|
4,323,735
|
2,882,030
|
||||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
5
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|||||||
2005
|
2004
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
$
|
4,726,309
|
3,372,892
|
||||
Net
earnings
|
|||||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to
|
|||||||
net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation,
amortization and accretion
|
1,268,632
|
1,173,435
|
|||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
2,343,000
|
2,658,000
|
|||||
Loss
on sale of investment securities
|
139,727
|
-
|
|||||
Recognition
of gain (loss) on sale of derivative instruments
|
283,256
|
(553,375
|
)
|
||||
Amortization
of deferred gain on sale of premises
|
(15,672
|
)
|
(16,553
|
)
|
|||
Gain
on sale of premises and equipment
|
(1,088
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Loss
on sale of repossessed assets
|
40,309
|
48,850
|
|||||
Change
in:
|
|||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
(387,055
|
)
|
(3,853,320
|
)
|
|||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
(223,177
|
)
|
(940,304
|
)
|
|||
Other
assets
|
676,581
|
(2,289,580
|
)
|
||||
Other
liabilities
|
242,056
|
391,541
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
9,092,878
|
(8,414
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of investment securities available for sale
|
(22,660,876
|
)
|
(37,027,393
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from calls and maturities of investment securities
|
|||||||
available
for sale
|
7,761,195
|
11,122,880
|
|||||
Purchases
of other investments
|
(5,052,790
|
)
|
(2,400,000
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of investment securities available for sale
|
8,358,392
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of other investments
|
4,104,000
|
2,195,000
|
|||||
Net
change in loans
|
(28,153,561
|
)
|
4,121,119
|
||||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(1,101,163
|
)
|
(1,116,325
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of premises and equipment
|
1,750
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sale of repossessed assets
|
64,719
|
1,183,533
|
|||||
Payment
from sale of derivative financial instruments
|
(870,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
(37,548,334
|
)
|
(21,921,186
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Net
change in deposits
|
31,036,699
|
15,916,410
|
|||||
Net
change in demand notes payable to U.S. Treasury
|
415,608
|
531,343
|
|||||
Proceeds
from FHLB borrowings
|
148,200,000
|
69,550,000
|
|||||
Repayments
of FHLB borrowings
|
(140,200,000
|
)
|
(67,550,000
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from exercise of options
|
70,855
|
179,764
|
|||||
Cash
paid in lieu of fractional shares
|
(4,700
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(207,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(1,035,858
|
)
|
(943,748
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
38,275,604
|
17,683,769
|
|||||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalent
|
9,820,148
|
(4,245,831
|
)
|
||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
16,790,871
|
20,782,786
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
26,611,019
|
16,536,955
|
6
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, continued
|
|||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004
|
|||||||
(Continued)
|
|||||||
2005
|
|
2004
|
|||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
10,988,218
|
8,795,888
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
1,568,000
|
1,432,066
|
||||
Noncash
investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities
|
|||||||
available
for sale, net
|
$
|
(662,020
|
)
|
48,438
|
|||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial
|
|||||||
instruments,
net
|
$
|
259,446
|
(539,300
|
)
|
|||
Transfer
of loans to other real estate and repossessions
|
$
|
93,710
|
936,881
|
||||
Financed
sale of other real estate
|
$
|
-
|
1,694,642
|
||||
Transfer
of retained earnings to common stock for
|
|||||||
issuance
of stock dividend
|
$
|
6,274,087
|
-
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
7
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(1)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples
Bank
(the “Bank”), along with the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples
Investment Services, Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively
called the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
consolidated financial statements in this report are unaudited. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments (none of which were other than normal accruals)
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of
operations for the periods presented have been included. Management of the
Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to reporting
of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition.
Many
of the Company’s accounting policies require significant judgment regarding
valuation of assets and liabilities and/or significant interpretation of
the
specific accounting guidance. A description of the Company’s significant
accounting policies can be found in Note 1 of the notes to consolidated
financial statements in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report to Shareholders which
is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the May 5, 2005 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
(2)
Allowance for Loan Losses
The
following is an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2005 and 2004:
2005
|
2004
|
|||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
8,048,627
|
|
9,722,267
|
Provision
for loan losses
|
|
2,343,000
|
|
2,658,000
|
Less:
|
||||
Charge-offs
|
|
(3,410,070)
|
|
(3,101,263)
|
Recoveries
|
353,274
|
|
174,131
|
|
Net
charge-offs
|
|
(3,056,796)
|
|
(2,927,132)
|
Balance,
end of period
|
$
|
7,334,831
|
|
9,453,135
|
(3)
Net
Earnings Per Share
Net
earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of
common
shares outstanding during the period while the effects of potential common
shares outstanding during the period are included in diluted earnings
per share.
The average market price during the year is used to compute equivalent
shares.
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings
per share” and “diluted earnings per share” for
the three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 is as
follows:
For
the three months ended September 30, 2005
|
|||||||
Net
Earnings
|
|
Common
Shares
|
|
|
Per
Share Amount
|
||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
1,841,473
|
|
3,453,485
|
$
|
0.53
|
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
|
67,295
|
||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
1,841,473
|
|
3,520,780
|
$
|
0.52
|
8
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2005
|
|||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
4,726,309
|
|
3,452,138
|
$
|
1.37
|
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
|
56,360
|
||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
4,726,309
|
|
3,508,498
|
$
|
1.35
|
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings
per share” and “diluted earnings per share” for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2004 is as follows:
For
the three months ended September 30, 2004
|
|||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
1,107,714
|
|
3,463,092
|
$
|
0.32
|
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
|
44,665
|
||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
1,107,714
|
|
3,507,757
|
$
|
0.32
|
For
the nine months ended September 30, 2004
|
|||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
3,372,892
|
|
3,459,507
|
$
|
0.97
|
|
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
|
45,053
|
||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
3,372,892
|
|
3,504,560
|
$
|
0.96
|
(4)
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging
Activities
In
the
normal course of business, the Company enters into derivative contracts
to
manage interest rate risk by modifying the characteristics of the related
balance sheet instruments in order to reduce the adverse effect of changes
in
interest rates. All derivative financial instruments are recorded at fair
value
in the financial statements.
On
the
date a derivative contract is entered into, the Company designates the
derivative as a fair value hedge, a cash flow hedge, or a trading instrument.
Changes in the fair value of instruments used as fair value hedges are
accounted
for in the earnings of the period simultaneous with accounting for the
fair
value change of the item being hedged. Changes in the fair value of the
effective portion of cash flow hedges are accounted for in other comprehensive
income rather than earnings. Changes in fair value of instruments that
are not
intended as a hedge are accounted for in the earnings of the period of
the
change.
If
a
derivative instrument designated as a fair value hedge is terminated or
the
hedge designation removed, the difference between a hedged item’s then carrying
amount and its face amount is recognized into income over the original
hedge
period. Likewise, if a derivative instrument designated as a cash flow
hedge in
terminated or the hedge designation removed, related amounts accumulated
in
other accumulated comprehensive income are reclassified into earnings over
the
original hedge period during which the hedged item affects
income.
9
The
Company formally documents all hedging relationships, including an assessment
that the derivative instruments are expected to be highly effective in
offsetting the changes in fair values or cash flows of the hedged items.
The
Company settled two previously outstanding interest rate swap agreements
during
the quarter ended June 30, 2005. The first swap with a notional amount
of $25.0
million and scheduled to mature in April 2006 was sold for a loss of $318,000.
The second swap with a notional amount of $30.0 million and scheduled to
mature
in September 2006 was sold for a loss of $552,000. The losses realized
upon
settlement are being recognized over the original term of the agreements,
and
during the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005, losses of approximately
$283,000 were recognized.
As
of
September 30, 2005, the Company had a cash flow hedge with a notional
amount of
$35 million. This derivative instrument consists of an interest rate
floor
contract that is used to protect certain designated variable rate loans
from the
downward effects of their repricing in the event of a decreasing rate
environment for a period of three years ending in July 2008. If the prime
rate
falls below 6.25% during the term of this contract, the Company will
receive
payments based on the $35 million notional amount times the difference
between
6.25% and the weighted average prime rate for the quarter. No payments
will be
received by the Company if the weighted average prime rate is 6.25% or
higher.
The Company paid a premium of $161,000 on this contact, which is being
amortized
over the three-year term of the contract.
(5)
Commitments and Contingencies
The
Company is party to financial instruments with off-balance-sheet risk in
the
normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers.
These
financial instruments include commitments to extend credit, standby letters
of
credit and financial guarantees. Those instruments involve, to varying
degrees,
elements of credit risk in excess of the amount recognized in the balance
sheet.
The contract amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of involvement
the
Company has in particular classes of financial instruments. At September
30,
2005, the contractual amounts of the Company’s commitments to extend credit and
standby letters of credit were $130.1 million and $3.1 million, respectively.
Commitments
to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there
is no
violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally
have fixed expiration dates and because they may expire without being drawn
upon, the total commitment amount of $130.1 million does not necessarily
represent future cash requirements. Standby letters of credit and financial
guarantees written are conditional commitments issued by the Company to
guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party.
The
Company has an overall interest rate-risk management strategy that incorporates
the use of derivative instruments to minimize significant unplanned fluctuations
in earnings that are caused by interest rate volatility. By using derivative
instruments, the Company is exposed to credit and market risk. If the
counterparty fails to perform, credit risk is equal to the extent of the
fair-value gain in the derivative. The Company attempts to minimize the
credit
risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with counterparties
that are reviewed periodically by the Company and are believed to be of
high
quality.
(6)
Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company has an Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”)
whereby certain stock-based rights, such as stock options, restricted stock,
performance units, stock appreciation rights, or book value shares, may
be
granted to eligible directors and employees. A total of 354,046 shares
were
reserved for possible issuance under this Plan. All rights must be granted
or
awarded within ten years from the effective date.
Under
the
Plan, the Company granted incentive stock options to certain eligible employees
in order that they may purchase Company stock at a price equal to the fair
market value on the date of the grant. The options granted in 1999 vest
over a
five-year period. Options granted subsequent to 1999 vest over a three-year
period. All options expire after ten years. A summary of the activity for
the
three and nine months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004 is presented
below:
10
Three
months ended
|
Three
months ended
|
||||||||||||
September
30, 2005
|
September
30, 2004
|
||||||||||||
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average Option Price Per Share
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted
Average Option Price Per Share
|
|||||||
Outstanding,
beginning of period
|
196,236
|
$
|
13.40
|
204,543
|
$
|
13.35
|
|||||||
Granted
during the period
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Forfeited
during the period
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Exercised
during the period
|
(550
|
)
|
11.53
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||
Outstanding,
end of period
|
195,686
|
$
|
13.41
|
204,543
|
$
|
13.35
|
|||||||
Number
of shares exercisable
|
168,558
|
$
|
13.41
|
147,779
|
$
|
13.23
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Nine
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
September
30, 2005
|
September
30, 2004
|
|
||||||||
|
|
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Option Price Per Share
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Option Price Per Share
|
|||
Outstanding,
beginning of period
|
202,401
|
$
|
13.39
|
216,713
|
$
|
13.26
|
|||||||
Granted
during the period
|
-
|
-
|
2,200
|
17.01
|
|||||||||
Forfeited
during the period
|
(1,194
|
)
|
12.82
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||
Exercised
during the period
|
(5,521
|
)
|
12.84
|
(14,370
|
)
|
12.51
|
|||||||
Outstanding,
end of period
|
195,686
|
$
|
13.41
|
204,543
|
$
|
13.35
|
|||||||
Number
of shares exercisable
|
168,558
|
$
|
13.41
|
147,779
|
$
|
13.23
|
The
Plan
is accounted for under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related
interpretations. No compensation expense has been recognized related to
the
grant of the incentive stock options. Had compensation cost been determined
based upon the fair value of the options at the grant dates, the Company’s net
earnings and net earnings per share would have been reduced to the proforma
amounts listed below. The Company did not grant any options during the
three
months ended September 30, 2005.
Three
months ended
|
Three
months ended
|
|||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2005
|
September
30, 2004
|
|||
Net
earnings
|
As
reported
|
$
|
1,841,473
|
$
|
1,107,714
|
|||||
|
Effect
of grants, net of tax
|
(21,100
|
)
|
(42,270
|
)
|
|||||
|
Effect
of forfeitures, net of tax
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Proforma
|
$
|
1,820,373
|
$
|
1,065,444
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
As
reported
|
$
|
0.53
|
$
|
0.32
|
|||||
|
Proforma
|
$
|
0.53
|
$
|
0.31
|
|||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
As
reported
|
$
|
0.52
|
$
|
0.32
|
|||||
|
Proforma
|
$
|
0.52
|
$
|
0.30
|
|||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||
|
|
|
|
|
|
September
30, 2005
|
|
September
30, 2004
|
||
Net
earnings
|
As
reported
|
$
|
4,726,309
|
$
|
3,372,892
|
|||||
|
Effect
of grants, net of tax
|
(66,507
|
)
|
(126,810
|
)
|
|||||
|
Effect
of forfeitures, net of tax
|
3,207
|
-
|
|||||||
|
Proforma
|
$
|
4,663,009
|
$
|
3,246,082
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
As
reported
|
$
|
1.37
|
$
|
0.97
|
|||||
|
Proforma
|
$
|
1.35
|
$
|
0.94
|
|||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
As
reported
|
$
|
1.35
|
$
|
0.96
|
|||||
|
Proforma
|
$
|
1.33
|
$
|
0.93
|
11
(7) Stock
Dividend
On
February 17, 2005, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a 10%
stock
dividend and a $0.10 per share cash dividend. As a result of the stock
dividend,
each shareholder received one new share of stock for every ten shares of
stock
they held as of the record date. Shareholders received a cash payment in
lieu of
any fractional shares resulting from the stock dividend. The cash dividend
was
paid based on the number of shares held by shareholders as adjusted by
the stock
dividend. The stock and cash dividends were paid on March 16, 2005 to
shareholders of record on March 3, 2005. All previously reported per share
amounts have been restated to reflect this stock dividend.
12
Item
2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
Introduction
Management's
discussion and analysis of earnings and related data are presented to assist
in
understanding the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Peoples Bancorp is the parent company
of
Peoples Bank (the “Bank”) and a registered bank holding company operating under
the supervision of the Federal Reserve Board. The Bank is a North
Carolina-chartered bank, with offices in Catawba, Lincoln, Alexander and
Mecklenburg Counties, operating under the banking laws of North Carolina
and the
rules and regulations of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
“FDIC”).
Overview
Our
business consists principally of attracting deposits from the general public
and
investing these funds in loans secured by commercial real estate, secured
and
unsecured commercial and consumer loans. Our profitability depends primarily
on
our net interest income, which is the difference between the income we
receive
on our loan and investment securities portfolios and our cost of funds,
which
consists of interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest
income
also is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. When interest-earning assets approximate
or exceed
interest-bearing liabilities, any positive interest rate spread will generate
net interest income. Our profitability is also affected by the level of
other
income and operating expenses. Other income consists primarily of miscellaneous
fees related to our loans and deposits, mortgage banking income and commissions
from sales of annuities and mutual funds. Operating expenses consist of
compensation and benefits, occupancy related expenses, federal deposit
and other
insurance premiums, data processing, advertising and other
expenses.
Our
operations are influenced significantly by local economic conditions and
by
policies of financial institution regulatory authorities. The earnings
on our
assets are influenced by the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary
and
fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board
of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, inflation, interest rates, market
and
monetary fluctuations. Lending activities are affected by the demand for
commercial and other types of loans, which in turn is affected by the interest
rates at which such financing may be offered. Our cost of funds is influenced
by
interest rates on competing investments and by rates offered on similar
investments by competing financial institutions in our market area, as
well as
general market interest rates. These factors can cause fluctuations in
our net
interest income and other income. In addition, local economic conditions
can
impact the credit risk of our loan portfolio, in that local employers may
be
required to eliminate employment positions of borrowers, and small businesses
and other commercial borrowers may experience a downturn in their operating
performance and become unable to make timely payments on their loans. Management
evaluates these factors in estimating its allowance for loan losses, and
changes
in these economic conditions could result in increases or decreases to
the
provision for loan losses.
Our
business emphasis has been to operate as a well-capitalized, profitable
and
independent community-oriented financial institution dedicated to providing
quality customer service. We are committed to meeting the financial needs
of the
communities in which we operate. We believe that we can be more effective
in
servicing our customers than many of our non-local competitors because
of our
ability to quickly and effectively provide senior management responses
to
customer needs and inquiries. Our ability to provide these services is
enhanced
by the stability of our senior management team.
The
Federal Reserve has increased the Federal Funds Rate a total of 2.75% since
June
2004 with the rate set at 3.75% as of September 30, 2005. These increases
had a
positive impact on third quarter earnings and should continue to have a
positive
impact on the Bank’s net interest income in the future periods. The positive
impact from the increase in the Federal Funds Rate has been partially offset
by
the decrease in earnings realized on interest rate swaps utilized by the
Company
to covert some variable rate loans to fixed rate. These swaps were put
in place
during the time that the Federal Funds Rate approached 1.00% and helped
to
offset the decline in income experienced in 2003 and 2004 because of the
reductions in the Federal Funds Rate that the Federal Reserve implemented
from
January 2001 to June 2003.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples
Bank,
along with its wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples Investment Services,
Inc. and
Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively called the “Company”). All
significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated
in
consolidation.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition.
Many
of the Company’s accounting policies require significant judgment regarding
valuation of assets and liabilities and/or significant interpretation of
specific accounting guidance. The following is a summary of some of the
more
subjective and complex accounting policies of the Company. A more complete
description of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be found in
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2005
Annual Report to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement
for the
May
13
Many
of
the Company’s assets and liabilities are recorded using various techniques that
require significant judgment as to recoverability. The collectability of
loans
is reflected through the Company’s estimate of the allowance for loan losses.
The Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its lending
portfolio to assess overall collectability. In addition, certain assets
and
liabilities are reflected at their estimated fair value in the consolidated
financial statements. Such amounts are based on either quoted market prices
or
estimated values derived from dealer quotes used by the Company, market
comparisons or internally generated modeling techniques. The Company’s internal
models generally involve present value of cash flow techniques. The various
techniques are discussed in greater detail elsewhere in management’s discussion
and analysis and the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
There
are
other complex accounting standards that require the Company to employ
significant judgment in interpreting and applying certain of the principles
prescribed by those standards. These judgments include, but are not limited
to,
the determination of whether a financial instrument or other contract meets
the
definition of a derivative in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities” (SFAS 133). For a more complete discussion of policies, see the
notes to the consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2003, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued FASB
Interpretation No. 46, “Consolidation of Variable Interest Entities - An
Interpretation of Accounting Research Bulletin No. 51” (“FIN 46”). In December
2003, the FASB issued a revised version of FIN 46 to resolve certain questions
and confusion related to the application of the original FIN 46. The Company
adopted FIN 46 (Revised) as of December 31, 2003, and as a result, the
Company’s
wholly owned subsidiary, PEBK Capital Trust I, is no longer included in
these
consolidated financial statements. The consolidated financial statements
have
been restated for all periods presented to reflect this change in accounting,
and the adoption of FIN 46 (Revised) had no impact on the Company’s reported
results of operations or shareholders’ equity.
In
November 2003, the
Emerging Issues Task Force (“EITF”) of the FASB reached a consensus on EITF
Issue No. 03-1, “The Meaning of Other-Than-Temporary Impairment and Its
Application to Certain Investments.” EITF 03-1 provides guidance on determining
other-than-temporary impairments and its application to marketable equity
securities and debt securities accounted for under SFAS No. 115, “Accounting for
Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” In September 2004, the FASB
issued FASB Staff Position (“FSP”) EITF Issue 03-1-1, which delayed the
effective date for the measurement and recognition guidance contained in
the
EITF 03-1 pending finalization of the draft FSP EITF Issue 03-1-a,
“Implementation Guidance for the Application of Paragraph 16 of EITF 03-1.” The
disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 remain in effect. The Company adopted
the
disclosure requirements of EITF 03-1 as of December 31, 2003. The adoption
of
the recognition and measurement provisions of EITF 03-1 are not expected
to have
a material impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or
cash flows. On June 29, 2005, the FASB Staff recommended to the FAS Board
to
nullify paragraphs 10-18 of EITF 03-1. FASB is scheduled to issue a final
FSP in
the fourth quarter of 2005.
In
December 2004, the FASB revised SFAS No. 123 (“SFAS No. 123 (R)”). SFAS No. 123
(R), “Share-Based Payment”, requires all share-based payments to employees,
including grants of employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial
statements based on their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer
an
alternative to financial statement recognition. SFAS No. 123 (R) is effective
for periods beginning after December 31, 2005. The Company is still evaluating
the transition provisions allowed by SFAS No. 123 (R) and expects to adopt
in
the first quarter of 2006. The financial statement impact is not expected
to be
materially different from that shown in the existing pro forma disclosure
required under the original SFAS No. 123.
Management
of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating
to
reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets
and
liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ
from
those estimates.
Results
of Operations
Summary.
Net
earnings for the third quarter of 2005 were $1.8 million, or $0.53 basic
net
earnings per share and $0.52 diluted net earnings per share as compared
to $1.1
million, or $0.32 basic and diluted net earnings per share for the same
period
one year ago. The increase in net earnings is primarily attributable to
increases in net interest income and non-interest income, which were partially
offset by an increase in non-interest expense.
The
annualized return on average assets was 1.02% for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 compared to 0.64% for the same period in 2004, and annualized
return on average shareholders' equity was 13.44% for the three months
ended
September 30, 2005 compared to 8.80% for the same period in 2004.
14
Net
earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 were $4.7 million,
or
$1.37 basic net earnings per share and $1.35 diluted net earnings per share.
The
increase in net earnings for the nine-month period ended September 30,
2005 is
primarily attributable to an increase in net interest income, an increase
in
non-interest income and a decrease in the provision for loan losses, which
were
partially offset by an increase in non-interest expense.
The
annualized return on average assets was 0.90% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 compared to 0.66% for the same period in 2004, and annualized
return on average shareholders’ equity was 11.55% for the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 compared to 8.82% for the same period in 2004.
Net
Interest Income. Net
interest income, the major component of the Company's net income, was $7.4
million for the three months ended September 30, 2005, an increase of 22%
over
the $6.0 million earned in the same period in 2004. The increase in net
interest
income for the third quarter of 2005 was primarily attributable to an increase
in interest income offsetting an increase in interest expense.
Interest
income increased $2.2 million or 24% for the three months ended September
30,
2005 compared with the same period in 2004. The increase was due to an
increase
in the average yield received on loans resulting from Federal Reserve interest
rate increases combined with an increase in the average outstanding balance
of
investment securities available for sale. During the quarter ended September
30,
2005, average investment securities available for sale increased $6.9 million
to
$107.9 million from $101.0 million for the three months ended September
30,
2004.
Interest
expense increased $874,000 or 28% for the three months ended September
30, 2005
compared with the same period in 2004. The increase in interest expense
was due
to an increase in the cost of funds to 2.78% for the three months ended
September 30, 2005 from 2.20% for the same period in 2004, combined with
an
increase in volume of interest-bearing liabilities. The increase in the
cost of
funds is primarily attributable to increases in the average rate paid on
interest-bearing checking and savings accounts and certificates of deposit.
The
average rate paid on interest-bearing checking and savings accounts was
1.37%
for the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to 1.11% for
the same
period of 2004. The average rate paid on certificates of deposits was 3.17%
for
the three months ended September 30, 2005 compared to 2.35% for the same
period
one year ago.
Net
interest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2005 was
$20.3
million, an increase of 14% over net interest income of $17.7 million for
the
nine months ended September 30, 2004. The increase in net interest income
for
the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was primarily attributable to
an
increase in interest income offsetting an increase in interest
expense.
Interest
income increased $4.4 million or 16% to $31.3 million for the nine months
ended
September 30, 2005 compared to $26.9 million for the same period in 2004.
The
increase was primarily due to an increase in the average yield received
on loans
resulting from Federal Reserve interest rate increases combined with an
increase
in the average outstanding balance of investment securities available for
sale.
Average investment securities available for sale increased 18% to $106.2
million
in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 compared to the same period
in 2004.
All other interest-earning assets including federal funds sold decreased
to an
average of $8.4 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2005 from
$9.0
million in the same period in 2004. The tax equivalent yield on average
earning
assets increased to 6.41% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
from
5.61% for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
Interest
expense increased 20% to $11.0 million for the nine months ended September
30,
2005 compared to $9.2 million for the corresponding period in 2004. The
increase
in interest expense was due to an increase in the cost of funds to 2.64%
for the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 from 2.20% for the same period in
2004. The
increase in the cost of funds is primarily attributable to increases in
the
average rate paid on interest-bearing checking and savings accounts and
certificates of deposit. The average rate paid on interest-bearing checking
and
savings accounts was 1.36% for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
as
compared to 1.00% for the same period in 2004. The average rate paid on
certificates of deposits was 2.91% for the nine months ended September
30, 2005
compared to 2.36% for the same period one year ago.
Provision
for Loan Losses. For
the
three months ended September 30, 2005, a contribution of $930,000 was made
to
the provision for loan losses compared to $931,000 for the same period
one year
ago.
For
the
nine months ended September 30, 2005 a contribution of $2.3 million was
made to
the provision for loan losses compared to a $2.7 million contribution to
the
provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2004.
The
decrease in the provision for loan losses reflects a $9.6 million reduction
in
classified loans as of September 30, 2005 when compared to September 30,
2004.
15
Non-Interest Income.
Total
non-interest income was $1.8 million in the third quarter of 2005, a 16%
increase over the $1.5 million for the same period in 2004. This increase
is
primarily due to an increase in fee income, mortgage banking income and
other
miscellaneous income. Service charges were $988,000 and $908,000 for the
three
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. This increase is
primarily due to an increase of $62,000 in NSF fee income. Other service
charges
and fees increased 119% to $308,000 for the three-month period ended September
30, 2005 when compared to the same period one year ago. This increase is
primarily attributable to an increase of $94,000 in check cashing fee income
and
an increase of $28,000 in miscellaneous fee income. Mortgage banking income
increased $36,000 or 37% during the three months ended September 30, 2005
as
compared to the corresponding period in 2004. Miscellaneous income was
$418,000
for the three months ended September 30, 2005, a 31% increase from $320,000
for
the same period in 2004. This increase in miscellaneous income was partially
attributable to an increase of $49,000 in debit card fee income primarily
associated with increased card usage due to an increased number of demand
accounts and a $41,000 increase in income from the Bank’s Real Estate Advisory
Services, Inc. subsidiary. These increases were partially
offset by a $140,000 loss on sale of securities.
Total
non-interest income was $5.3 million for the nine months ended September
30,
2005, a 15% increase over the $4.6 million for the same period in 2004.
This
increase is primarily due to an increase in fee income, mortgage banking
income
and other miscellaneous income. Service charges were $2.7 million for
the nine
months ended September 30, 2005, a 6% increase over the same period in
2004.
This increase is primarily due to an increase of $158,000 in NSF fee
income.
Other service charges and fees increased 76% to $824,000 for the nine
months
ended September 30, 2005 when compared to the same period one year ago.
This
increase is primarily attributable to an increase of $202,000 in check
cashing
fee income and an increase of $92,000 in miscellaneous fee income. Mortgage
banking income increased 33% to $338,000 for the nine months ended September
30,
2005 when compared to the same period in 2004. Miscellaneous income increased
31% to $1.2 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. This
increase
in miscellaneous income was partially attributable to an increase of
$143,000 in
debit card fee income primarily associated with increased card usage
due to an
increased number of demand accounts. These increases were partially offset
by a
$140,000 loss on sale of securities.
Non-Interest
Expense.
Total
non-interest expense increased 8% to $5.4 million for the third quarter
of 2005
as compared to $5.0 million for the corresponding period in 2004. Salary
and
employee benefits totaled $3.1 million for the three months ended September
30,
2005, an increase of 10% from the same period in 2004. The increase in
salary
and employee benefits is due to normal salary increases and increased
employee
incentive expense. Occupancy expense increased 12% for the quarter ended
September 30, 2005 due to an increase in furniture and equipment expense
and
lease expense. The increase in furniture and equipment expense and lease
expense
in 2005 was due to software purchases for the Bank and overhead expenses,
including lease agreements, associated with the opening of the Bank’s Banco de
la Gente branches. Other non-interest expense increased 2% to $1.3 million
for
the three months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the same period
in
2004.
Total
non-interest expense was $15.9 million for the nine months ended September
30,
2005, an increase of 9% over the same period in 2004. Salary and employee
benefits totaled $9.1 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2005, an
increase of 9% over the same period in 2004. The increase in salary and
employee
benefits is primarily due to normal salary increases and increased incentive
expense. Occupancy expense increased 11% for the nine months ended September
30,
2005 primarily due to an increase in furniture and equipment expense
and lease
expense. Other non-interest expense increased 9% to $3.9 million for
the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 as compared to the same period in 2004.
The
increase in other non-interest expense included an increase in professional
fees
of $84,000, advertising expense of $65,000 and an increase in telephone
expense
of $50,000.
Income
Taxes. The
Company reported income taxes of $1.0 million and $552,000 for the third
quarters of 2005 and 2004, respectively. This represented effective tax
rates of
35% and 33% for the respective periods.
The
Company reported income taxes of $2.5 million and $1.7 million for the
nine
months ended September 30, 2005 and 2004, respectively. This represented
effective tax rates of 35% and 34% for the respective periods.
Analysis
of Financial Condition
Investment
Securities. Available-for-sale
securities amounted to $110.8 million at September 30, 2005 compared
to $105.6
million at December 31, 2004. This increase is primarily the result of
additional securities purchases, which were partially offset by paydowns
on
mortgage-backed securities, calls and maturities. Average investment
securities
available for sale for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 amounted
to
$106.2 million compared to $93.8 million for the year ended December
31, 2004.
Loans.
At
September 30, 2005, loans amounted to $560.5 million compared to $535.5
million
at December 31, 2004, an increase of $25.0 million. Average loans represented
83% of total earning assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2005
as
compared to 84% for the year ended December 31, 2004. Mortgage loans
held for
sale were $4.2
16
Allowance
for Loan Losses. The
allowance for loan losses reflects management's assessment and estimate
of the
risks associated with extending credit and its evaluation of the quality
of the
loan portfolio. The Bank periodically analyzes the loan portfolio in
an effort
to review asset quality and to establish an allowance for loan losses
that
management believes will be adequate in light of anticipated risks and
loan
losses. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, size, quality and
risk of
loans in the portfolio are reviewed. Other factors considered are:
· |
the
Bank’s loan loss experience;
|
· |
the
amount of past due and non-performing loans;
|
· |
specific
known risks;
|
· |
the
status and amount of other past due and non-performing
assets;
|
· |
underlying
estimated values of collateral securing loans;
|
· |
current
and anticipated economic conditions; and
|
· |
other
factors which management believes affect the allowance for
potential
credit losses.
|
An
analysis of the credit quality of the loan portfolio and the adequacy of
the
allowance for loan losses is prepared by the Bank’s credit administration
personnel and presented to the Bank’s Board of Directors on a regular basis. The
allowance is the total of specific reserves allocated to significant individual
loans plus a general reserve. After individual loans with specific allocations
have been deducted, the general reserve is calculated by applying general
reserve percentages to the nine risk grades within the portfolio. Loans
are
categorized as one of nine risk grades based on management’s assessment of the
overall credit quality of the loan, including payment history, financial
position of the borrower, underlying collateral and internal credit review.
The
general reserve percentages are determined by management based on its evaluation
of losses inherent in the various risk grades of loans. The allowance for
loan
losses is established through charges to expense in the form of a provision
for
loan losses. Loan losses and recoveries are charged and credited directly
to the
allowance.
The
following table presents the percentage of loans assigned to each risk
grade
along with the general reserve percentage applied to loans in each risk
grade at
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004.
LOAN
RISK GRADE ANALYSIS:
|
Percentage
of Loans
|
General
Reserve
|
|||||||||||
By
Risk Grade*
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||
09/30/2005
|
|
12/31/2004
|
|
09/30/2005
|
|
12/31/2004
|
|||||||
Risk
1 (Excellent Quality)
|
14.26%
|
|
13.44%
|
|
0.15%
|
|
0.15%
|
|
|||||
Risk
2 (High Quality)
|
18.84%
|
|
23.03%
|
|
0.50%
|
|
0.50%
|
|
|||||
Risk
3 (Good Quality)
|
56.89%
|
|
53.89%
|
|
1.00%
|
|
1.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
4 (Management Attention)
|
7.03%
|
|
5.67%
|
|
2.50%
|
|
2.50%
|
|
|||||
Risk
5 (Watch)
|
0.58%
|
|
0.95%
|
|
7.00%
|
|
7.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
6 (Substandard)
|
0.88%
|
|
0.61%
|
|
12.00%
|
|
12.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
7 (Low Substandard)
|
0.60%
|
|
1.46%
|
|
25.00%
|
|
25.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
8 (Doubtful)
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
50.00%
|
|
50.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
9 (Loss)
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
100.00%
|
|
100.00%
|
|
|||||
*Excludes
non-accrual loans
|
At September 30, 2005 there was one relationship exceeding $1.0 million
(which
totaled $1.1 million) in the Watch risk grade, two relationships exceeding
$1.0
million each (which totaled $2.5 million) in the Substandard risk grade
and one
relationship exceeding $1.0 million (which totaled $3.2 million) in the
Low
Substandard risk grade. Balances of individual relationships exceeding
$1.0
million in these risk grades ranged from $1.1 million to $3.2 million.
These
customers continue to meet payment requirements and these relationships
would
not become non-performing assets unless they are unable to meet those
requirements.
An
allowance for loan losses is also established, as necessary, for individual
loans considered to be impaired in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 114. A loan is considered impaired when, based
on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due
according
to the contractual terms of the loan will not be collected. Impaired loans
are
measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted
at
the loan’s effective interest rate, or at the loan’s observable market price, or
the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At September
30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, the recorded investment in loans that were
considered to be impaired under SFAS No. 114 was approximately $5.2 million
and
$5.3 million, respectively, with related allowance for loan losses of
approximately $756,000 and $787,000, respectively.
17
The
allowance for loan losses totaled $7.3 million at September 30, 2005 and
$8.0
million at December 31, 2004, which represented 1.31% of total loans outstanding
at September 30, 2005 and 1.50% of total loans outstanding as of December
31,
2004. The decrease was the result of net charge-offs taken during the nine
months ended September 30, 2005 totaling $3.1 million.
Net
charge-offs were offset by a $2.3 million contribution to the provision
for loan
losses for the nine months ended September 30, 2005. The
overall
decrease in the allowance for loan losses reflects a $4.5 million reduction
in
classified loans as of September 30, 2005 when compared to December 31,
2004.
The
Bank’s allowance for loan losses is also subject to regulatory examinations
and
determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors
as the
methodology used to calculate the allowance for loan losses and the size
of the
allowance for loan losses compared to a group of peer banks identified
by the
regulators. During their routine examinations of banks, the FDIC and the
North
Carolina Commissioner of Banks may require the Company to recognize additions
to
the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them
at
the time of their examination.
While
it
is the Bank's policy to charge off in the current period loans for which
a loss
is considered probable, there are additional risks of future losses which
cannot
be quantified precisely or attributed to particular loans or classes of
loans.
Because these risks include the state of the economy, management’s judgment as
to the adequacy of the allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise.
After
review of all relevant matters affecting loan collectability, management
believes that the allowance for loan losses is appropriate.
The
Company grants loans and extensions of credit primarily within the Catawba
Valley region of North Carolina, which encompasses Catawba, Alexander,
Iredell
and Lincoln counties and also in Mecklenburg County. Although the Bank
has a
diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the loan portfolio
is
collateralized by real estate, which is dependent upon the real estate
market.
Non-real estate loans also can be affected by local economic conditions.
At
September 30, 2005, approximately 6% of the Company’s portfolio was not secured
by any type of collateral. Unsecured loans generally involve higher credit
risk
than secured loans and, in the event of customer default, the Company has
a
higher exposure to potential loan losses.
Non-performing
Assets. Non-performing
assets totaled $5.9 million at September 30, 2005 or 0.81% of total assets,
compared to $6.0 million at December 31, 2004, or 0.88% of total assets.
Non-accrual loans were $5.1 million at September 30, 2005 and December
31, 2004.
As a percentage of total loans outstanding, non-accrual loans were 0.91%
at
September 30, 2005 compared to 0.95% at December 31, 2004. The Bank had
loans
ninety days past due and still accruing at September 30, 2005 of $136,000
as
compared to $245,000 at December 31, 2004. Other real estate owned totaled
$671,000 as of September 30, 2005 as compared to $682,000 at December 31,
2004.
The Bank had no repossessed assets as of September 30, 2005 or December
31,
2004.
Total
non-performing loans, which include non-accrual loans and loans ninety
days past
due and still accruing, were $5.2 million and $5.3 million at September
30, 2005
and December 31, 2004, respectively. The ratio of non-performing loans
to total
loans was 0.93% at September 30, 2005, as compared to 1.00% at December
31,
2004.
Deposits.
Total
deposits at September 30, 2005 were $587.6 million, an increase of $31.1
million
over deposits of $556.5 million at December 31, 2004. Core deposits, which
include non-interest bearing demand deposits, NOW, MMDA, savings and
certificates of deposits of denominations less than $100,000, increased
$26.9
million to $429.1 million at September 30, 2005 as compared to $402.2 million
at
December 31, 2004 primarily due to an increase of $20.6 in non-interest
bearing
demand deposits. Certificates of deposit in amounts greater than $100,000
or
more totaled $158.5 million at September 30, 2005 as compared to $154.3
million
at December 31, 2004. At September 30, 2005, brokered deposits amounted
to $50.0
million as compared to $39.4 million at December 31, 2004. Brokered deposits
outstanding as of September 30, 2005 had a weighted average rate of 3.39%
with a
weighted average original term of 20 months.
Borrowed
Funds. Borrowings
from the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) totaled $67.0 million at September 30, 2005
compared to $59.0 million at December 31, 2004. The average balance of
FHLB
borrowings for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 was $65.4 million
compared to $58.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2004. At September
30,
2005, FHLB borrowings with maturities exceeding one year amounted to $64.5
million. The FHLB has the option to convert $52.0 million of the total
advances
to a floating rate and, if converted, the Bank may repay advances without
payment of a prepayment fee. The Company also has an additional $10.0 million
in
variable rate convertible advances, which may be repaid without a prepayment
fee
if converted by the FHLB. The Company had no federal funds purchased as
of
September 30, 2005 or December 31, 2004.
Junior
Subordinated Debentures (related to Trust Preferred Securities).
In
December 2001 the Company formed a wholly owned Delaware statutory trust,
PEBK
Capital Trust I (“PEBK Trust”), which issued $14.0 million of guaranteed
preferred beneficial interests in the Company’s junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures that qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve
Board
guidelines. All of the common securities of PEBK Trust are owned by the
Company.
18
The
proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the trust preferred
securities were used by PEBK Trust to purchase $14.4 million of junior
subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay a floating rate equal
to prime
plus 50 basis
points. The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of the junior
subordinated debentures were used for general purposes, primarily to
provide
capital to the Bank. The debentures represent the sole asset of PEBK
Trust. PEBK
Trust is not included in the consolidated financial statements at September
30,
2005 or December 31, 2004.
The
trust
preferred securities accrue and pay quarterly distributions based on the
liquidation value of $50,000 per capital security at a floating rate of
prime
plus 50 basis points. The Company has guaranteed distributions and other
payments due on the trust preferred securities to the extent PEBK Trust
has
funds with which to make the distributions and other payments. The net
combined
effect of all the documents entered into in connection with the trust preferred
securities is that the Company is liable to make the distributions and
other
payments required on the trust preferred securities.
The
trust
preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the debentures
on December 31, 2031, or upon earlier redemption as provided in the indenture.
The Company has the right to redeem the debentures purchased by PEBK Trust,
in
whole or in part, on or after December 31, 2006. As specified in the indenture,
if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption price
will be
the principal amount and any accrued but unpaid interest.
Asset
Liability and Interest Rate Risk Management. The
objective of the Company’s Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk strategies is
to identify and manage the sensitivity of net interest income to changing
interest rates and to minimize the interest rate risk between interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities at various maturities. This is
to be
done in conjunction with the need to maintain adequate liquidity and the
overall
goal of maximizing net interest income.
The Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates through
policies established by the Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) of the Bank. The
ALCO meets monthly and has the responsibility for approving asset/liability
management policies, formulating and implementing strategies to improve
balance
sheet positioning and/or earnings and reviewing the interest rate sensitivity
of
the Company. ALCO tries to minimize interest rate risk between interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities by attempting to minimize wide
fluctuations in net interest income due to interest rate movements. The
ability
to control these fluctuations has a direct impact on the profitability
of the
Company. Management monitors this activity on a regular basis through analysis
of its portfolios to determine the difference between rate sensitive assets
and
rate sensitive liabilities.
The
Company’s rate sensitive assets are those earning interest at variable rates and
those with contractual maturities within one year. Rate sensitive assets
therefore include both loans and available-for-sale securities. Rate sensitive
liabilities include interest-bearing checking accounts, money market deposit
accounts, savings accounts, time deposits and borrowed funds. The Company’s
balance sheet is asset-sensitive, meaning that in a given period there
will be
more assets than liabilities subject to immediate repricing as interest
rates
change in the market. Because most of the Company’s loans are tied to the prime
rate, they reprice more rapidly than rate sensitive interest-bearing deposits.
During periods of rising rates, this results in increased net interest
income.
The opposite occurs during periods of declining rates. Average rate sensitive
assets for the nine months ended September 30, 2005 totaled $660.6 million,
exceeding average rate sensitive liabilities of $558.2 million by $102.4
million.
During
the second quarter of 2005, the Company settled two previously outstanding
interest rate swap agreements. The first swap, with a notional amount of
$25.0
million and scheduled to mature in April 2006 was sold for a loss of $318,000.
The second swap with a notional amount of $30.0 million and scheduled to
mature
in September 2006 was sold for a loss of $552,000. The losses realized
upon
settlement are being recognized over the original term of the agreements
and
during the nine-month period, ended September 30, 2005, losses of approximately
$283,000 were recognized.
In
order
to assist in achieving a desired level of interest rate sensitivity, the
Company
entered into an off-balance sheet contract that is considered a derivative
financial instrument. As of September 30, 2005, the Company had a cash
flow
hedge with a notional amount of $35 million. This derivative instrument
consists
of an interest rate floor contract that is used to protect certain designated
variable rate loans from the downward effects of their repricing in the
event of
a decreasing rate environment for a period of three years ending in July
2008.
If the prime rate falls below 6.25% during the term of this contract, the
Company will receive payments based on the $35 million notional amount
times the
difference between 6.25% and the weighted average prime rate for the quarter.
No
payments will be received by the Company if the weighted average prime
rate is
6.25% or higher. The Company paid a premium of $161,000 on this contact,
which
is being amortized over the three-year term of the contract. Management
believes
that the risk associated with using this type of derivative financial instrument
to mitigate interest rate risk should not have any material unintended
impact on
the Company’s financial condition or results of operations.
The
Bank
also utilizes interest rate floors on certain variable rate loans to protect
against further downward movements in the prime rate. At September 30,
2005, the
Bank had $99.9 million in loans with interest rate floors;
19
however,
none of the floors were in effect pursuant to the terms of the promissory
notes
on these loans.
Liquidity.
The
objectives of the Company’s liquidity policy are to provide for the availability
of adequate funds to meet the needs of loan demand, deposit withdrawals,
maturing liabilities and to satisfy regulatory requirements. Both deposit
and
loan customer cash needs can fluctuate significantly depending upon business
cycles, economic conditions and yields and returns available from alternative
investment opportunities. In addition, the Company’s liquidity is affected by
off-balance sheet commitments to lend in the form of unfunded commitments
to
extend credit and standby letters of credit. As of September 30, 2005 such
unfunded commitments to extend credit were $130.1 million, while commitments
in
the form of standby letters of credit totaled $3.1 million.
The
Company uses several sources to meet its liquidity requirements. The primary
source is core deposits, which includes demand deposits, savings accounts
and
certificates of deposits of denominations less than $100,000. The Company
considers these to be a stable portion of the Company’s liability mix and the
result of on-going consumer and commercial banking relationships. As of
September 30, 2005, the Company’s core deposits totaled $429.1 million, or 73%
of total deposits.
The
other
sources of funding for the Company are through large denomination certificates
of deposit, including brokered deposits, federal funds purchased and FHLB
advances. The Bank is also able to borrow from the Federal Reserve System
on a
short-term basis.
At
September 30, 2005, the Bank had a significant amount of deposits in amounts
greater than $100,000, including brokered deposits of $50.0 million, which
mature over the next two years. The balance and cost of these deposits
are more
susceptible to changes in the interest rate environment than other deposits.
The
Bank
had a line of credit with the FHLB equal to 20% of the Bank’s total assets, with
an outstanding balance of $67.0 million at September 30, 2005. The remaining
availability at FHLB was $49.4 million at September 30, 2005. The Bank
also had
the ability to borrow up to $26.5 million for the purchase of overnight
federal
funds from three correspondent financial institutions as of September 30,
2005.
The
liquidity ratio for the Bank, which is defined as net cash, interest bearing
deposits with banks, federal funds sold, certain investment securities
and
certain FHLB advances available under the line of credit, as a percentage
of net
deposits (adjusted for deposit runoff projections) and short-term liabilities
was 39.49% at September 30, 2005 and 34.82% at December 31, 2004. The minimum
required liquidity ratio as defined in the Bank’s Asset/Liability and Interest
Rate Risk Management Policy is 20%.
Contractual
Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. The
Company’s contractual obligations and other commitments as of September 30, 2005
and December 31, 2004 are summarized in the table below. The Company’s
contractual obligations include the repayment of principal and interest
related
to FHLB advances and junior subordinated debentures, as well as certain
payments
under current lease agreements. Other commitments include commitments to
extend
credit. Because not all of these commitments to extend credit will be drawn
upon, the actual cash requirements are likely to be significantly less
than the
amounts reported for other commitments below.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS:
|
|||||||
September
30, 2005
|
December
31, 2004
|
||||||
Contractual
Cash Obligations
|
|||||||
Long-term
borrowings
|
$ |
|
64,500,000
|
57,000,000
|
|||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
14,433,000
|
14,433,000
|
|||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
8,814,150
|
8,280,080
|
|||||
Total
|
$ |
|
87,747,150
|
79,713,080
|
|||
Other
Commitments
|
|||||||
Commitments
to extend credit
|
$ |
|
130,073,355
|
123,093,680
|
|||
Standby
letters of credit and financial guarantees written
|
3,051,141
|
3,278,326
|
|||||
Total
|
$ |
|
133,124,496
|
126,372,006
|
The
Company enters into derivative contracts to manage various financial risks.
A
derivative is a financial instrument that derives its cash flows, and therefore
its value, by reference to an underlying instrument, index or referenced
interest rate. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value on the
consolidated balance sheet with the fair value representing the net present
value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market interest
rates as of the balance sheet date. Derivative contracts are written in
amounts
referred to as notional amounts, which only provide the basis for
20
calculating
payments between counterparties and are not a measure of financial risk.
Further
discussions of derivative instruments are included above in the section
entitled
“Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk Management”.
Capital
Resources. Shareholders’
equity at September 30, 2005 was $54.1 million compared to $50.9 million
at
December 31, 2004. At September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, unrealized
losses, net of taxes, amounted to $523,000 and $121,000, respectively.
The
increase in unrealized losses at September 30, 2005 is primarily attributable
to
a decrease in the market value of available for sale securities and derivative
instruments. Management expects that accumulated comprehensive income (loss)
will continue to fluctuate due to changes in the market value of available
for
sale investments securities and derivative instruments caused by changes
in
market interest rates. Annualized return on average equity for the nine
months
ended September 30, 2005 was 11.55% compared to 9.47% for the year ended
December 31, 2004. Total cash dividends paid during the nine months ended
September 30, 2005 amounted to $1.0 million as compared to total cash dividends
of $944,000 paid for the first nine months of 2004.
During
first quarter 2005, the Company declared and distributed a 10% stock dividend
to
its shareholders. All previously reported per share amounts have been restated
to reflect the stock dividend.
Since
implementation of a stock repurchase plan implemented in November 2004,
which
expires in November 2005, the Company has repurchased $498,000, or 25,100
shares
of its common stock.
Under
the
regulatory capital guidelines, financial institutions are currently required
to
maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, with a Tier
1
risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater. Tier 1 capital is generally
defined
as shareholders' equity and Trust Preferred Securities less all intangible
assets and goodwill. The Company’s Tier I capital ratio was 10.98% and 10.97% at
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. Total risk-based
capital
is defined as Tier 1 capital plus supplementary capital. Supplementary
capital,
or Tier 2 capital, consists of the Company's allowance for loan losses,
not
exceeding 1.25% of the Company's risk-weighted assets. Total risk-based
capital
ratio is therefore defined as the ratio of total capital (Tier 1 capital
and
Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets. The Company’s total risk-based capital
ratio was 12.15% and 12.22% at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively. In addition to the Tier I and total risk-based capital
requirements, financial institutions are also required to maintain a leverage
ratio of Tier 1 capital to total average assets of 4.0% or greater. The
Company’s Tier I leverage capital ratio was 9.80% and 9.50% at September 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
The
Bank’s Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 10.39% and 10.35% at September 30,
2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively. The total risk-based capital
ratio for
the Bank was 11.57% and 11.60% at September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004,
respectively. The Bank’s Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 9.26% and 8.95% at
September 30, 2005 and December 31, 2004, respectively.
A
bank is
considered to be "well capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital
ratio
of 10.0 % or greater, a Tier I risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater,
and
has a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater. Based upon these guidelines, the
Bank
was considered to be "well capitalized" at September 30, 2005 and December
31,
2004.
The
capital treatment of trust preferred securities has been reviewed recently
by
the Federal Reserve Bank. The Federal Reserve Bank’s proposal for capital
treatment of trust preferred securities, released May 4, 2004, would continue
to
permit the inclusion of trust preferred securities in Tier 1 capital of
bank
holding companies. Further discussions of FIN 46 are included under “Recent
Accounting Pronouncements” in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in the Company’s 2005 Annual Report.
21
Item
3.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There
have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures
about market risks as of September 30, 2005 from that presented in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2004.
22
Item
4.
Controls
and Procedures
The
Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of
the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based
on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing,
summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under
the
Exchange Act.
There
have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under
the
Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that
have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
23
PART
II.
OTHER
INFORMATION
Item
1.
Legal
Proceedings
In
the
opinion of management, the Company is not involved in any pending legal
proceedings other than routine, non-material proceedings occurring in
the
ordinary course of business.
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
(c)
ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|||||||||||||
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid per Share
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced
Plans or Programs
|
Maximum
Number
of Shares that May Yet Be Purchased Under the Plans or Programs
|
|||||||||
July
1 - 31, 2005
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
August
1 - 31, 2005
|
750
|
$
|
20.91
|
-
|
-
|
||||||||
September
1 - 30, 2005
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||
Total
|
750
|
$
|
20.91
|
-
|
-
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
|
Not
applicable
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
|
Not
applicable
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
|
Not
applicable
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
Exhibit
(3)(i)
|
Articles
of Incorporation of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.,
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (3)(i) to the Form 8-A filed with
the Securities and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on September 2, 1999
|
||
Exhibit
(3)(ii)
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (3)(ii) to the Form 10-K filed
with the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2004
|
||
Exhibit
(4)
|
Specimen
Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit
(4) to the Form
8-
|
|
A
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September
2,
1999
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(a)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Tony W. Wolfe
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(a) to the Form 10-K filed with
the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(b)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Joseph F. Beaman,
Jr.
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(b) to the Form 10-K filed
with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2000
|
24
Exhibit
(10)(c)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and William D. Cable
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(d) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(d)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Lance A. Sellers
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(e) to the Form 10-K filed with the
Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(e)
|
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus Stock Ownership and
Long
|
|
Term
Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(f) to
the Form
10-K
|
||
filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(f)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and A. Joseph Lampron
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(g) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(g)
|
Peoples
Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral Plan, incorporated by
reference to
|
|
Exhibit
(10)(h) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange
|
||
Commission
on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(h)
|
Rabbi
Trust for the Peoples Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral
Plan,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(i)
|
Description
of Service Recognition Program maintained by Peoples Bank,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003
|
||
Exhibit
(14)
|
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (14) to the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2005
|
||
Exhibit
(31)(a)
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-
|
|
Oxley
Act of 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(31)(b)
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-
|
|
Oxley
Act of 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(32)
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section
|
|
906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.
|
||
November
10, 2005
|
/s/ Tony W. Wolfe | |
Date
|
Tony
W. Wolfe
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
November
10, 2005
|
/s/ A. Joseph Lampron | |
Date
|
A.
Joseph Lampron
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal
Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
||
26