PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC - Quarter Report: 2006 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|||||||||||||
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
|||||||||||||
FORM
10-Q
|
|||||||||||||
[
X
] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||||||||||||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||||||||||||
For
the quarterly period ended: June 30,
2006
|
|||||||||||||
OR
|
|||||||||||||
[
]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||||||||||||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||||||||||||
For
the transition period from __________ to __________
|
|||||||||||||
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
|
|||||||||||||
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|||||||||||||
North
Carolina
|
|||||||||||||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|||||||||||||
000-27205
|
56-2132396
|
||||||||||||
(Commission
File No.)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
||||||||||||
518
West C Street, Newton, North Carolina
|
28658
|
||||||||||||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
||||||||||||
(828)
464-5620
|
|||||||||||||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
|||||||||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
|||||||||||||
Yes
|
X
|
No
|
|||||||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
|||||||||||||
Large
Accelerate Filer
|
Accelerated Filer
|
Non-Accelerated Filer
|
X
|
||||||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
|||||||||||||
Yes
|
No
|
X
|
|||||||||||
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes
of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
3,793,126
shares of common stock, outstanding at July 31,
2006.
|
INDEX
|
||||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
PAGE(S)
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at June 30, 2006 (Unaudited) and December
|
||||
31,
2005
|
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings for the three months ended June 30,
|
||||
2006 and 2005 (Unaudited), and for the six months ended June 30, 2006 | ||||
and
2005 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months
|
||||
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited), and for the six months ended | ||||
June
30, 2006 and 2005 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June
30,
|
||||
2006
and 2005 (Unaudited)
|
6-7
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
8-12
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
|||
and
Results of Operations
|
13-22
|
|||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
23
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
24
|
||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
25
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
25
|
||
Item 2. | Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds |
25
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
25
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
25
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
26
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
26-27
|
||
Signatures
|
28
|
|||
Certifications
|
29-31
|
Statements
made in this Form 10-Q, other than those concerning historical information,
should be considered forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities
Litigation Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of management
and on
the information available to management at the time that this Form 10-Q was
prepared. These statements can be identified by the use of words like “expect,”
“anticipate,” “estimate,” and “believe,” variations of these words and other
similar expressions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements as a number of important factors could cause actual results to
differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to,
(1)
competition in the markets served by Peoples Bank, (2) changes in the interest
rate environment, (3) general national, regional or local economic conditions
may be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a
deterioration in credit quality and the possible impairment of collectibility
of
loans, (4) legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting
standards, (5) significant changes in the federal and state legal and regulatory
environments and tax laws, (6) the impact of changes in monetary and fiscal
policies, laws, rules and regulations and (7) other risks and factors identified
in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including but not limited to those described in Peoples Bancorp of North
Carolina, Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2005.
2
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|||||||
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
Assets
|
2006
|
2005
|
|||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
28,048,883
|
18,468,999
|
||||
Federal
funds sold
|
2,951,000
|
1,347,000
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
30,999,883
|
19,815,999
|
|||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
113,225,359
|
115,158,184
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
6,055,199
|
5,810,749
|
|||||
Total
securities
|
119,280,558
|
120,968,933
|
|||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
3,440,575
|
2,247,900
|
|||||
Loans
|
607,230,621
|
566,663,416
|
|||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(7,922,419
|
)
|
(7,424,782
|
)
|
|||
Net
loans
|
599,308,202
|
559,238,634
|
|||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
12,779,739
|
12,662,153
|
|||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
6,415,211
|
6,311,757
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable and other assets
|
11,468,148
|
9,034,239
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
783,692,316
|
730,279,615
|
||||
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
|||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||
Non-interest
bearing demand
|
$
|
105,941,780
|
94,660,721
|
||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings
|
171,272,466
|
183,248,699
|
|||||
Time,
$100,000 or more
|
175,658,315
|
152,410,976
|
|||||
Other
time
|
157,916,424
|
152,533,265
|
|||||
Total
deposits
|
610,788,985
|
582,853,661
|
|||||
Demand
notes payable to U.S. Treasury
|
177,851
|
1,473,693
|
|||||
Securities
sold under agreement to repurchase
|
2,868,110
|
981,050
|
|||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
74,100,000
|
71,600,000
|
|||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
35,052,000
|
14,433,000
|
|||||
Accrued
interest payable and other liabilities
|
3,899,724
|
4,585,217
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
726,886,670
|
675,926,621
|
|||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value; authorized
|
|||||||
5,000,000
shares; no shares issued
|
|||||||
and
outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock, no par value; authorized
|
|||||||
20,000,000
shares; issued and
|
|||||||
outstanding
3,788,284 shares in 2006
|
|||||||
and
3,440,805 shares in 2005
|
50,384,830
|
41,096,500
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
9,318,997
|
14,656,160
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(2,898,181
|
)
|
(1,399,666
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
56,805,646
|
54,352,994
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
783,692,316
|
730,279,615
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
3
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|||||||
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|||
Interest
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
12,543,896
|
9,220,188
|
24,071,375
|
17,682,125
|
||||||||
Interest
on federal funds sold
|
17,060
|
1,425
|
21,202
|
2,905
|
|||||||||
Interest
on investment securities:
|
|||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies
|
1,070,334
|
854,201
|
2,092,008
|
1,702,557
|
|||||||||
States
and political subdivisions
|
193,411
|
180,632
|
386,161
|
362,495
|
|||||||||
Other
|
120,424
|
91,924
|
245,587
|
178,957
|
|||||||||
Total
interest income
|
13,945,125
|
10,348,370
|
26,816,333
|
19,929,039
|
|||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
|||||||||||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings deposits
|
681,623
|
641,962
|
1,356,360
|
1,275,282
|
|||||||||
Time
deposits
|
3,432,723
|
2,101,247
|
6,420,454
|
3,890,924
|
|||||||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
968,265
|
710,008
|
1,853,955
|
1,421,784
|
|||||||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
297,681
|
225,516
|
577,320
|
432,990
|
|||||||||
Other
|
48,300
|
7,045
|
83,843
|
11,111
|
|||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
5,428,592
|
3,685,778
|
10,291,932
|
7,032,091
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income
|
8,516,533
|
6,662,592
|
16,524,401
|
12,896,948
|
|||||||||
Provision
for loans losses
|
413,000
|
723,000
|
1,172,000
|
1,413,000
|
|||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
8,103,533
|
5,939,592
|
15,352,401
|
11,483,948
|
|||||||||
Non-interest
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Service
charges
|
1,016,930
|
947,309
|
1,941,875
|
1,752,569
|
|||||||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
363,012
|
270,865
|
759,029
|
515,492
|
|||||||||
Loss
on sale of securities
|
(91,951
|
)
|
-
|
(173,751
|
)
|
-
|
|||||||
Mortgage
banking income
|
119,268
|
101,640
|
239,876
|
204,756
|
|||||||||
Insurance
and brokerage commissions
|
109,783
|
102,761
|
213,683
|
212,520
|
|||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
508,871
|
419,181
|
983,080
|
794,487
|
|||||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
2,025,913
|
1,841,756
|
3,963,792
|
3,479,824
|
|||||||||
Non-interest
expense:
|
|||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
3,265,032
|
2,971,765
|
6,503,802
|
6,034,266
|
|||||||||
Occupancy
|
1,017,425
|
988,560
|
2,005,821
|
1,957,626
|
|||||||||
Other
|
1,660,957
|
1,340,364
|
3,136,269
|
2,567,644
|
|||||||||
Total
non-interest expenses
|
5,943,414
|
5,300,689
|
11,645,892
|
10,559,536
|
|||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
4,186,032
|
2,480,659
|
7,670,301
|
4,404,236
|
|||||||||
Income
taxes
|
1,524,600
|
872,600
|
2,773,800
|
1,519,400
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
2,661,432
|
1,608,059
|
4,896,501
|
2,884,836
|
||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.70
|
0.42
|
1.29
|
0.76
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.68
|
0.42
|
1.26
|
0.75
|
||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per share
|
$
|
0.11
|
0.09
|
0.21
|
0.18
|
||||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
4
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|||||||||||||
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
||||||||||||
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||||||||||||
2006
|
|
2005
|
|
2006
|
|
2005
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
2,661,432
|
1,608,059
|
4,896,501
|
2,884,836
|
||||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding losses on securities
|
|||||||||||||
available
for sale
|
(1,668,016
|
)
|
696,306
|
(2,346,369
|
)
|
(906,427
|
)
|
||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||||||||
sales
of securities available for sale included
|
|||||||||||||
in
net earnings
|
91,951
|
-
|
173,751
|
-
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
holding losses on derivative
|
|||||||||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
|||||||||||||
hedges
|
(220,198
|
)
|
243,826
|
(666,903
|
)
|
(75,174
|
)
|
||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||||||||
derivative
financial instruments qualifying as
|
|||||||||||||
cash
flow hedges included in net earnings
|
105,530
|
82,798
|
301,630
|
82,798
|
|||||||||
Total
other comprehensive loss,
|
|||||||||||||
before
income taxes
|
(1,690,733
|
)
|
1,022,930
|
(2,537,891
|
)
|
(898,803
|
)
|
||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit) related to other
|
|||||||||||||
comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding losses on securities
|
|||||||||||||
available
for sale
|
(649,692
|
)
|
271,211
|
(913,911
|
)
|
(353,053
|
)
|
||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||||||||
sales
of securities available for sale included
|
|||||||||||||
in
net earnings
|
35,815
|
-
|
67,676
|
-
|
|||||||||
Unrealized
holding losses on derivative
|
|||||||||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
|||||||||||||
hedges
|
(114,513
|
)
|
94,970
|
(310,626
|
)
|
(29,281
|
)
|
||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||||||||
derivative
financial instruments qualifying as
|
|||||||||||||
cash
flow hedges included in net earnings
|
41,103
|
32,250
|
117,485
|
32,250
|
|||||||||
Total
income tax benefit related to
|
|||||||||||||
other
comprehensive income
|
(687,287
|
)
|
398,431
|
(1,039,376
|
)
|
(350,084
|
)
|
||||||
Total
other comprehensive loss,
|
|||||||||||||
net
of tax
|
(1,003,446
|
)
|
624,499
|
(1,498,515
|
)
|
(548,719
|
)
|
||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
|
1,657,986
|
2,232,558
|
3,397,986
|
2,336,117
|
||||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
5
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|||||||
Six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|||||||
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
||||
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
4,896,501
|
2,884,836
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to
|
|||||||
net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation,
amortization and accretion
|
859,573
|
836,359
|
|||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,172,000
|
1,413,000
|
|||||
Loss
on sale of investment securities
|
173,751
|
-
|
|||||
Recognition
of loss on sale of derivative instruments
|
301,630
|
82,798
|
|||||
Amortization
of deferred gain on sale of premises
|
(10,448
|
)
|
(10,447
|
)
|
|||
Gain
on sale of repossessed assets
|
(13,453
|
)
|
(2,859
|
)
|
|||
Amortization
of deferred issuance costs on trust preferred securities
|
156,723
|
8,871
|
|||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
1,757
|
-
|
|||||
Change
in:
|
|||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
(1,192,675
|
)
|
426,425
|
||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
(103,454
|
)
|
(168,785
|
)
|
|||
Other
assets
|
(1,571,650
|
)
|
1,000,768
|
||||
Other
liabilities
|
(685,493
|
)
|
(437,971
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
3,984,762
|
6,032,995
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of investment securities available for sale
|
(10,759,635
|
)
|
(6,655,522
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from calls and maturities of investment securities available for
sale
|
4,055,529
|
5,503,368
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sales of investment securities available for sale
|
6,325,544
|
-
|
|||||
Purchases
of other investments
|
(7,282,450
|
)
|
(4,395,790
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of other investments
|
7,038,000
|
3,298,500
|
|||||
Net
change in loans
|
(41,520,523
|
)
|
(17,111,546
|
)
|
|||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(837,418
|
)
|
(986,160
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of repossessed assets
|
443,123
|
59,487
|
|||||
Purchases
of derivative financial instruments
|
(961,500
|
)
|
(870,000
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
(43,499,330
|
)
|
(21,157,663
|
)
|
|||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Net
change in deposits
|
27,935,324
|
12,325,933
|
|||||
Net
change in demand notes payable to U.S. Treasury
|
(1,295,842
|
)
|
(382,493
|
)
|
|||
Net
change in securities sold under agreement to repurchase
|
1,887,060
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from FHLB borrowings
|
397,500,000
|
129,500,000
|
|||||
Repayments
of FHLB borrowings
|
(395,000,000
|
)
|
(119,500,000
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from issuance of trust preferred securities
|
20,619,000
|
-
|
|||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
281,042
|
64,514
|
|||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(425,000
|
)
|
-
|
||||
Cash
paid in lieu of fractional shares
|
(6,426
|
)
|
(4,700
|
)
|
|||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(796,706
|
)
|
(690,472
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
50,698,452
|
21,312,782
|
|||||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalent
|
11,183,884
|
6,188,114
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
19,815,999
|
16,790,871
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
30,999,883
|
22,978,985
|
6
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, continued
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005
|
|||||||
2006
|
|
|
2005
|
||||
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
10,544,350
|
6,951,184
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
3,087,600
|
814,000
|
||||
Noncash
investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities
|
|||||||
available
for sale, net
|
$
|
(1,326,383
|
)
|
(553,373
|
)
|
||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial
|
|||||||
instruments,
net
|
$
|
(172,132
|
)
|
4,654
|
|||
Transfer
of loans to other real estate and repossessions
|
$
|
278,954
|
34,757
|
||||
Transfer
of retained earnings to common stock for
|
|||||||
issuance
of stock dividend
|
$
|
9,430,532
|
6,274,087
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
7
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(1)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples
Bank
(the “Bank”), along with the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples
Investment Services, Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively
called the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
consolidated financial statements in this report are unaudited. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments (none of which were other than normal accruals)
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of
operations for the periods presented have been included. Management of the
Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to reporting
of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition.
Many
of the Company’s accounting policies require significant judgment regarding
valuation of assets and liabilities and/or significant interpretation of
the
specific accounting guidance. A description of the Company’s significant
accounting policies can be found in Note 1 of the notes to consolidated
financial statements in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders which
is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the May 4, 2006 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
In
June
2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a tentative conclusion
on
EITF 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit
Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements." This
issue, if
ratified by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), would require
companies to recognize an obligation for the future post-retirement benefits
provided to employees in the form of death benefits to be paid to their
beneficiaries through split-dollar polices carried in Bank Owned Life Insurance
(BOLI). If adopted as proposed, this would be effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. Management is currently evaluating the
effect
of the proposal on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition,
as the Bank has split-dollar policies in place in its BOLI.
(2)
Allowance for Loan Losses
The
following is an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 and 2005:
2006
|
2005
|
||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
7,424,782
|
8,048,627
|
||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
1,172,000
|
1,413,000
|
|||||
Less:
|
|||||||
Charge-offs
|
(900,487
|
)
|
(1,681,002
|
)
|
|||
Recoveries
|
226,124
|
240,831
|
|||||
Net
charge-offs
|
(674,363
|
)
|
(1,440,171
|
)
|
|||
Balance,
end of period
|
$
|
7,922,419
|
8,021,456
|
(3)
Net Earnings Per Share
Net
earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period while the effects of potential common
shares outstanding during the period are included in diluted earnings per
share.
The average market price during the year is used to compute equivalent
shares.
All previously reported per share amounts have been restated to reflect
a 10%
stock dividend approved on April 20, 2006 by the Board of Directors of
the
Company.
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings
per share” and “diluted earnings per share” for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2006 is as follows:
8
For
the three months ended June 30, 2006
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per
Share
|
||||
|
|
|
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Amount
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
2,661,432
|
3,785,115
|
$
|
0.70
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
101,455
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
2,661,432
|
3,886,570
|
$
|
0.68
|
For
the six months ended June 30, 2006
|
||||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
4,896,501
|
3,788,314
|
$
|
1.29
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
93,514
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
4,896,501
|
3,881,828
|
$
|
1.26
|
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings
per share” and “diluted earnings per share” for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2005 is as follows:
For
the three months ended June 30, 2005
|
||||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
1,608,059
|
3,797,883
|
$
|
0.42
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
53,143
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
1,608,059
|
3,851,026
|
$
|
0.42
|
|||||
For
the six months ended June 30, 2005
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
2,884,836
|
3,796,599
|
$
|
0.76
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
55,883
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
2,884,836
|
3,852,482
|
$
|
0.75
|
(4)
Derivative Financial Instruments and Hedging
Activities
The
Company entered into a new interest rate floor contract with a notional
amount
of $45.0 million during the first quarter of 2006. This derivative instrument
is
used to hedge future cash flows of the first $45.0 million of certain variable
rate home equity loans against the downward effects of their repricing
in the
event of a decreasing rate environment for a period of three years ending
in
January 2009. If the prime rate falls below 7.50% during the term of this
contract, the Company will receive payments based on the $45.0 million
notional
amount times the difference between 7.50% and the weighted average prime
rate
for the quarter. No payments will be received by the Company if the weighted
average prime rate is 7.50% or higher. The Company paid a premium of $562,500
on
this contract.
The
Company also entered into another new interest rate floor contract with
a
notional amount of $35.0 million during the second quarter of 2006. This
derivative instrument is used to hedge future cash flows of the first $35.0
million of certain variable rate construction loans against the downward
effects
of their repricing in the event of a decreasing rate environment for a
period of
three years ending in June 2009. If the prime rate falls below 8.00% during
the
term of this contract, the Company will receive payments based on the $35.0
million notional amount times the difference between 8.00% and the weighted
average prime rate for the quarter. No payments will be received by the
Company
if the weighted average prime rate is 8.00% or higher. The Company paid
a
premium of $399,000 on this contract.
9
(5)
Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company has an Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan (the
"Plan")
whereby certain stock-based rights, such as stock options, restricted stock,
performance units, stock appreciation rights, or book value shares, may
be
granted to eligible directors and employees. A total of 354,046
shares were reserved for possible issuance under this Plan. All rights
must be granted or awarded within ten years from the 1999 effective date.
Under
the
Plan, the Company granted incentive stock options to certain eligible employees
in order that they may purchase Company stock at a price equal to the fair
market value on the date of the grant. The options granted in 1999 vest
over a
five-year period. Options granted subsequent to 1999 vest over a three-year
period. All options expire ten years after issuance. The
Company did not grant any options during the three and six months ended
June 30,
2006. A
summary
of the activity for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006 is presented
below:
Three
months ended
|
|||||||||||||
June
30, 2006
|
|||||||||||||
Shares
|
Weighted
Average
Option Price Per Share
|
Weighted
Average Remaining
Contractual
Term (in years)
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
beginning of period
|
197,750
|
$
|
12.20
|
||||||||||
Granted
during the period
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
during the period
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
during the period
|
(7,501
|
)
|
12.74
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
end of period
|
190,249
|
$
|
12.18
|
5.26
|
$
|
2,482,606
|
|||||||
Number
of shares exercisable
|
187,828
|
$
|
12.13
|
5.21
|
$
|
2,606,539
|
|||||||
|
|
|
Six
months ended
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
June
30, 2006
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Shares
|
Weighted
Average Option Price Per Share
|
|
Weighted
Average Remaining Contractual Term (in years)
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic
Value
|
||||
Outstanding,
beginning of period
|
213,128
|
$
|
12.19
|
||||||||||
Granted
during the period
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Forfeited
during the period
|
-
|
-
|
|||||||||||
Exercised
during the period
|
(22,879
|
)
|
12.28
|
||||||||||
Outstanding,
end of period
|
190,249
|
$
|
12.18
|
5.26
|
$
|
2,482,606
|
|||||||
Number
of shares exercisable
|
187,828
|
$
|
12.13
|
5.21
|
$
|
2,606,539
|
The
Company adopted Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (“SFAS”)
No. 123(R), Share-Based Payment (“SFAS No. 123(R)”), on
January 1, 2006 using the “modified prospective” method. Under this method,
awards that are granted, modified, or settled after December 31, 2005, are
measured and accounted for in accordance with SFAS No. 123(R). Also under
this method, expense is recognized for unvested awards that were granted
prior
to January 1, 2006, based upon the fair value determined at the grant date
under SFAS No. 123, Accounting for Stock-Based Compensation (“SFAS
No. 123”). The
Company recognized compensation expense for employee stock options of $300
and
$1,800 for the three and six months ended June 30, 2006, respectively.
The
Company did not recognize any tax benefit on compensation expense from
employee
stock options in either the first or second quarter of 2006. As
of
June 30, 2006, there was $9,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related
to nonvested employee stock options, which is expected to be recognized
over a
period of 2 years. The Company did not recognize any compensation expense
for
employee stock options for the three and six months ended June 30,
2005.
Prior
to
the adoption of SFAS No. 123(R), the Company accounted for stock
compensation under Accounting Principles Board Opinion No. 25 and related
interpretations. Accordingly, the Company previously recognized
10
no
compensation cost for employee stock options. The
following table illustrates the effect on net earnings and earnings per
share if
the Company had applied the fair value recognition provisions of SFAS
No. 123 as of June 30, 2005.
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
|||||||||
June
30, 2005
|
June
30, 2005
|
|||||||||
Net
earnings
|
As
reported
|
$
|
1,608,059
|
2,884,836
|
||||||
|
Effect of
grants
|
(34,604
|
)
|
(74,461
|
)
|
|||||
|
Effect of
forfeitures
|
-
|
5,253
|
|||||||
|
Proforma
|
$
|
1,573,455
|
2,815,628
|
||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
As
reported
|
$
|
0.42
|
0.76
|
||||||
|
Proforma
|
$
|
0.41
|
0.74
|
||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
As
reported
|
$
|
0.42
|
0.75
|
||||||
|
Proforma
|
$
|
0.41
|
0.73
|
No
options were granted during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
The
total intrinsic value (amount by which the fair market value of the underlying
stock exceeds the exercise price of an option on exercise date) of options
exercised during the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $103,000
and
$10,000, respectively. A total of 807 options vested during the three months
ended June 30, 2006 and the three months ended June 30, 2005. Cash received
from
option exercises for the three months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was
$96,000
and $23,000, respectively. The tax benefit for the tax deductions from
option
exercises totaled $35,000 and $8,000, respectively for the three months
ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005.
No
options were granted during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005.
The
total intrinsic value (amount by which the fair market value of the underlying
stock exceeds the exercise price of an option on exercise date) of options
exercised during the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $244,000
and
$25,000, respectively. A total of 807 options vested during the six months
ended
June 30, 2006 and the six months ended June 30, 2005. Cash received from
option
exercises for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005 was $281,000
and
$65,000, respectively. The tax benefit for the tax deductions from option
exercises totaled $91,000 and $14,000, respectively for the six months
ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005.
(6) Stock
Dividend
On
April
20, 2006, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a 10% stock
dividend
and a $0.11 per share cash dividend. As a result of the stock dividend,
each
shareholder received one new share of stock for every ten shares of stock
they held as of the record date. Shareholders received a cash payment in
lieu of any fractional shares resulting from the stock dividend. The cash
dividend was paid based on the number of shares held by shareholders as
adjusted by the stock dividend. All previously reported per share amounts
have
been restated to reflect this stock dividend.
(7) Junior
Subordinated Debentures
In
June
2006 the Company formed a second wholly owned Delaware statutory trust,
PEBK
Capital Trust II (“PEBK Trust II”), which issued $20.0 million of guaranteed
preferred beneficial interests in the Company’s junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures. All of the common securities of PEBK Trust II are
owned by
the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities
and the
trust preferred securities were used by PEBK Trust II to purchase $20.6
million
of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay a floating
rate
equal to three month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The proceeds received
by the
Company from the sale of the junior subordinated debentures are intended
to be
used to repay the trust preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust in
December
2001 and for general purposes. The debentures represent the sole asset
of PEBK
Trust II. PEBK Trust II is not included in the consolidated financial
statements.
The
trust
preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust II accrue and pay quarterly
at a
floating rate of three month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The Company
has
guaranteed distributions and other payments due on the trust preferred
securities to the extent PEBK Trust II has funds with which to make the
distributions and other payments. The net combined effect of all the
documents
entered into in connection with the trust preferred securities is that
the
Company is liable to make the distributions and other payments required
on the
trust preferred securities.
11
These
trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of
the
debentures on June 28, 2036, or upon earlier redemption as provided in
the
indenture. The Company has the right to redeem the debentures purchased
by PEBK
Trust II, in whole or in part, on or after June 28, 2011. As specified
in the
indenture, if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption
price will be the principal amount and any accrued but unpaid
interest.
12
Item
2.
Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results
of
Operations
Introduction
Management's
discussion and analysis of earnings and related data are presented to assist
in
understanding the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Peoples Bancorp is the parent company
of
Peoples Bank (the “Bank”) and a registered bank holding company operating under
the supervision of the Federal Reserve Board. The Bank is a North
Carolina-chartered bank, with offices in Catawba, Lincoln, Alexander Mecklenburg
and Iredell counties, operating under the banking laws of North Carolina
and the
rules and regulations of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the
“FDIC”).
Overview
Our
business consists principally of attracting deposits from the general public
and
investing these funds in loans secured by commercial real estate, secured
and
unsecured commercial and consumer loans. Our profitability depends primarily
on
our net interest income, which is the difference between the income we
receive
on our loan and investment securities portfolios and our cost of funds,
which
consists of interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest
income
also is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. When interest-earning assets approximate
or exceed
interest-bearing liabilities, any positive interest rate spread will generate
net interest income. Our profitability is also affected by the level of
other
income and operating expenses. Other income consists primarily of miscellaneous
fees related to our loans and deposits, mortgage banking income and commissions
from sales of annuities and mutual funds. Operating expenses consist of
compensation and benefits, occupancy related expenses, federal deposit
and other
insurance premiums, data processing, advertising and other
expenses.
Our
operations are influenced significantly by local economic conditions and
by
policies of financial institution regulatory authorities. The earnings
on our
assets are influenced by the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary
and
fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board
of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System, inflation, interest rates, market
and
monetary fluctuations. Lending activities are affected by the demand for
commercial and other types of loans, which in turn is affected by the interest
rates at which such financing may be offered. Our cost of funds is influenced
by
interest rates on competing investments and by rates offered on similar
investments by competing financial institutions in our market area, as
well as
general market interest rates. These factors can cause fluctuations in
our net
interest income and other income. In addition, local economic conditions
can
impact the credit risk of our loan portfolio, in that local employers may
be
required to eliminate employment positions of borrowers, and small businesses
and other commercial borrowers may experience a downturn in their operating
performance and become unable to make timely payments on their loans. Management
evaluates these factors in estimating its allowance for loan losses, and
changes
in these economic conditions could result in increases or decreases to
the
provision for loan losses.
Our
business emphasis has been to operate as a well-capitalized, profitable
and
independent community-oriented financial institution dedicated to providing
quality customer service. We are committed to meeting the financial needs
of the
communities in which we operate. We believe that we can be more effective
in
servicing our customers than many of our non-local competitors because
of our
ability to quickly and effectively provide senior management responses
to
customer needs and inquiries. Our ability to provide these services is
enhanced
by the stability of our senior management team.
The
Federal Reserve has increased the Federal Funds Rate a total of 3.00% since
December 31, 2004 with the rate set at 5.25% as of June 30, 2006. These
increases had a positive impact on second quarter earnings and should continue
to have a positive impact on the Bank’s net interest income in the future
periods. The positive impact from the increase in the Federal Funds Rate
has
been partially offset by the decrease in earnings realized on interest
rate
contracts, including both interest rate swaps and interest rate floors,
utilized
by the Company. The swaps were put in place during the time that the Federal
Funds Rate approached 1.00% and helped to offset the decline in income
experienced in 2003 and 2004 because of the reductions in the Federal Funds
Rate
that the Federal Reserve implemented from January 2001 to June 2003. Additional
information regarding the Company’s interest rate contacts is provided below in
the section entitled “Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk Management.”
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples
Bank,
along with the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples Investment Services,
Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively called the
“Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition.
Many
of the Company’s accounting policies require significant judgment regarding
valuation of assets and liabilities and/or significant interpretation of
specific accounting guidance. The following is a summary of some of the
more
subjective and complex accounting policies of the Company. A more complete
13
description
of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be found in Note 1 of the
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report
to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the May
4, 2006
Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The following is a summary of the more
subjective and complex accounting policies of the Company.
Many
of
the Company’s assets and liabilities are recorded using various techniques that
require significant judgment as to recoverability. The collectability of
loans
is reflected through the Company’s estimate of the allowance for loan losses.
The Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its lending
portfolio to assess overall collectability. In addition, certain assets
and
liabilities are reflected at their estimated fair value in the consolidated
financial statements. Such amounts are based on either quoted market prices
or
estimated values derived from dealer quotes used by the Company, market
comparisons or internally generated modeling techniques. The Company’s internal
models generally involve present value of cash flow techniques. The various
techniques are discussed in greater detail elsewhere in management’s discussion
and analysis and the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
There
are
other complex accounting standards that require the Company to employ
significant judgment in interpreting and applying certain of the principles
prescribed by those standards. These judgments include, but are not limited
to,
the determination of whether a financial instrument or other contract meets
the
definition of a derivative in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities.” For a more complete discussion of policies, see the notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
In
December 2004, the FASB
revised SFAS No. 123 (“SFAS No. 123 (R)”). SFAS No. 123 (R), “Share-Based
Payment”, requires all share-based payments to employees, including grants of
employee stock options, to be recognized in the financial statements based
on
their fair values. Pro forma disclosure is no longer an alternative to
financial
statement recognition. SFAS No. 123 (R) is effective for periods beginning
after
December 31, 2005. The Company recognized compensation expense for employee
stock options of $300 and $1,800 for the three and six months ended June
30,
2006, respectively. The
Company did not recognize any tax benefit on compensation expense from
employee
stock options in the either the first or second quarter of 2006.
In
June
2006, the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) reached a tentative conclusion
on
EITF 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit
Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements." This
issue, if
ratified by the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB), would require
companies to recognize an obligation for the future post-retirement benefits
provided to employees in the form of death benefits to be paid to their
beneficiaries through split-dollar polices carried in Bank Owned Life
Insurance
(BOLI). If adopted as proposed, this would be effective for fiscal years
beginning after December 15, 2006. Management is currently evaluating
the effect
of the proposal on the Company’s results of operations and financial condition,
as the Bank has split-dollar policies in place in its BOLI.
The
Company currently qualifies as a non-accelerated filer in accordance with
Rule
12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Therefore, the Company is
not
currently subject to the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act
of 2002 (“SOX 404”). The Company will qualify as an accelerated filer and be
required to comply with SOX 404 effective December 31, 2006. The Company
will
incur additional consulting and audit expenses in becoming compliant and
continuing to comply with SOX 404. Management does not expect expenses
related
to SOX 404 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
The Bank opened a new Banco de la Gente office in Union County, in Monroe, North Carolina in June 2006 in a continuing effort to serve the Latino community. The Bank also plans to open a new traditional banking office in Iredell County, in Mooresville, North Carolina during fourth quarter 2006. Management expects to continue to open at least one new traditional office in Mecklenburg or Iredell counties in each of the next two to three years and additional Banco de la Gente offices in other metropolitan areas in North Carolina.
Management
of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating
to
reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets
and
liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ
from
those estimates.
Results
of Operations
Summary.
Net
earnings for the second quarter of 2006 were $2.7 million, or $0.70 basic
net
earnings per share and $0.68 diluted net earnings per share as compared
to $1.6
million, or $0.42 basic and diluted net earnings per share for the same
period
one year ago. Net earnings from recurring operations for the three months
ended
June 30, 2006 were $2.7 million, or $0.72 basic net income per share and
$0.70
diluted net income per share, as compared to the second quarter of 2005
net
income from recurring operations of $1.6 million, or $0.42 basic and diluted
net
income per share. The increase in net earnings is primarily attributable
to
growth in interest-earning assets, which contributed to increases in net
interest
14
income,
and non-interest income. In addition the Company had a decrease in the
provision
for loan losses. The increases in net interest income and non-interest
income
and the decrease in the provision for loan losses were partially offset
by an
increase in non-interest expense.
The
annualized return on average assets was 1.40% for the three months ended
June
30, 2006 compared to 0.93% for the same period in 2005, and annualized
return on
average shareholders' equity was 18.52% for the three months ended June
30, 2006
compared to 12.27% for the same period in 2005.
Net
earnings for the six months ended June 30, 2006 were $4.9 million, or $1.29
basic net earnings per share and $1.26 diluted net earnings per share.
Net
earnings from recurring operations for the six months ended June 30, 2006
were
$5.1 million, or $1.35 basic net income per share and $1.32 diluted net
income
per share, representing a 78% increase over net earnings from recurring
operations of $2.9 million, or $0.76 basic net income per share and $0.75
diluted net income per share, for the same period one year ago. The increase
in
net earnings for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006 is primarily
attributable to growth in interest-earning assets, which contributed to
increases in net interest income, and non-interest income. In addition
the
Company had a decrease in the provision for loan losses. The increases
in net
interest income and non-interest income and the decrease in the provision
for
loan losses were partially offset by an increase in non-interest expense.
The
annualized return on average assets was 1.31% for the six months ended
June 30,
2006 compared to 0.84% for the same period in 2005, and annualized return
on
average shareholders’ equity was 16.91% for the six months ended June 30, 2006
compared to 10.96% for the same period in 2005.
Net
Interest Income. Net
interest income, the major component of the Company's net earnings, was
$8.5
million for the three months ended June 30, 2006, an increase of 28% over
the
$6.7 million earned in the same period in 2005. The increase in net interest
income for the second quarter of 2006 was primarily attributable to increases
in
the prime rate resulting from Federal Reserve interest rate increases combined
with increases in the average outstanding balances of loans and investment
securities available-for-sale.
Interest
income increased $3.6 million or 35% for the three months ended June 30,
2006
compared with the same period in 2005. The increase was due to an increase
in
the average yield received on loans resulting from Federal Reserve interest
rate
increases combined with an increase in the average outstanding balance
of loans
and investment securities available-for-sale. The average yield earned
on loans,
including fees, was 8.44% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 as compared
to 6.79% for the same period of 2005. During the quarter ended June 30,
2006,
average loans increased $51.7 million to $596.2 million from $544.5 million
for
the three months ended June 30, 2005. During the quarter ended June 30,
2006,
average investment securities available-for-sale increased $11.9 million
to
$117.3 million from $105.4 million for the three months ended June 30,
2005.
Interest
expense increased $1.7 million or 47% for the three months ended June 30,
2006
compared with the same period in 2005. The increase in interest expense
was due
to an increase in the cost of funds to 3.58% for the three months ended
June 30,
2006 from 2.66% for the same period in 2005, combined with an increase
in volume
of interest-bearing liabilities. The increase in the cost of funds is primarily
attributable to increases in the average rate paid on interest-bearing
deposits.
The average rate paid on interest-bearing checking and savings accounts
was
1.61% for the three months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to 1.37% for
the same
period of 2005. The average rate paid on certificates of deposits was 4.05%
for
the three months ended June 30, 2006 compared to 2.92% for the same period
one
year ago.
Net
interest income for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006 was $16.5
million,
an increase of 28% over net interest income of $12.9 million for the six
months
ended June 30, 2005. This increase is attributable to an increase in interest
income due to increases in the prime rate, combined with increases in the
average outstanding balances of loans and investment securities
available-for-sale.
Interest
income increased $6.9 million or 35% to $26.8 million for the six months
ended
June 30, 2006 compared to $19.9 million for the same period in 2005. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in the average yield received
on loans
resulting from Federal Reserve interest rate increases combined with an
increase
in the average outstanding balance of investment securities available for
sale.
The average yield earned on loans, including fees, was 8.25% for the six
months
ended June 30, 2006 as compared to 6.58% for the same period of 2005. During
the
six months ended June 30, 2006, average loans increased $46.6 million to
$588.4
million from $541.7 million for the same period in 2005. Average investment
securities available for sale increased 11% to $117.0 million in the six
months
ended June 30, 2006 compared to the same period in 2005. All other
interest-earning assets including federal funds sold increased to an average
of
$8.4 million in the six months ended June 30, 2006 from $7.0 million in
the same
period in 2005. The tax equivalent yield on average earning assets increased
to
7.67% for the six months ended June 30, 2006 from 6.24% for the six months
ended
June 30, 2005.
15
Interest
expense increased 46% to $10.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006
compared to $7.0 million for the corresponding period in 2005. The increase
in
interest expense was due to an increase in the cost of funds to 3.45% for
the
six months ended June 30, 2006 from 2.56% for the same period in 2005.
The
increase in the cost of funds is primarily attributable to increases in
the
average rate paid on interest-bearing deposits. The average rate paid on
interest-bearing checking and savings accounts was 1.59% for the six months
ended June 30, 2006 as compared to 1.35% for the same period in 2005. The
average rate paid on certificates of deposits was 3.91% for the six months
ended
June 30, 2006 from 2.77% for the same period one year ago.
Provision
for Loan Losses. For
the
three months ended June 30, 2006, a contribution of $413,000 was made to
the
provision for loan losses compared to $723,000 for the same period one
year ago.
For the six months ended June 30, 2006 a contribution of $1.2 million was
made
to the provision for loan losses compared to a $1.4 million contribution
to the
provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2005. The decrease
in the provision for loan losses is primarily attributable to a decrease
in
non-accrual loans of $3.4 million when compared to June 30, 2005.
Non-Interest Income.
Total
non-interest income was $2.0 million in the second quarter of 2006, a 10%
increase over the $1.8 million for the same period in 2005. This increase
is
primarily due to an increase in service charge and fee income and other
miscellaneous income resulting from activity in new branches opened in
2004 and
2005. Service charges were $1.0 million and $947,000 for the three months
ended
June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This increase is primarily due to
an
increase of $39,000 in account maintenance income. Other service charges
and
fees increased 34% to $363,000 for the three-month period ended June 30,
2006
when compared to the same period one year ago. This increase is primarily
attributable to an increase of $65,000 in check cashing fee income. Mortgage
banking income increased $18,000 or 17% during the three months ended June
30,
2006 as compared to the corresponding period in 2005. Miscellaneous
income was $509,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2006, a 21% increase
from $419,000 for the same period in 2005. This increase in miscellaneous
income
was partially attributable to an increase of $56,000 in debit card fee
income
primarily associated with increased card usage due to an increased number
of
demand accounts and a $18,000 increase in income from the Bank’s Real Estate
Advisory Services, Inc. subsidiary. These increases were partially offset
by a
$92,000 loss on sale of securities. Recurring non-interest income amounted
to
$2.1 million and $1.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
and 2005,
respectively. The increase in recurring non-interest income is primarily
due to
an increase in service charges and fees and miscellaneous other income.
Net
non-recurring losses on the disposition of assets totaled $87,000 for the
three
months ended June 30, 2006 and included a $92,000 loss on the sale of securities
partially offset by a $5,000 gain on the disposition of assets.
Total
non-interest income was $4.0 million for the six months ended June 30,
2006, a
14% increase over the $3.5 million for the same period in 2005. This
increase is
primarily due to an increase in fee income and other miscellaneous income
resulting from activity in new branches opened in 2004 and 2005. Service
charges
were $1.9 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an 11% increase
over
the same period in 2005. This increase is primarily due to an increase
of
$78,000 in NSF fee income. Other service charges and fees increased 47%
to
$759,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 when compared to the
same period
one year ago. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase
of $145,000
in check cashing fee income and an increase of $46,000 in miscellaneous
fee
income. Mortgage banking income increased 17% to $240,000 for the six
months
ended June 30, 2006 when compared to the same period in 2005. Miscellaneous
income increased 24% to $983,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006.
This
increase in miscellaneous income was partially attributable to an increase
of
$101,000 in debit card fee income primarily associated with increased
card usage
due to an increased number of demand accounts. These
increases were partially offset by a $174,000 loss on sale of securities,
which
reflects management’s efforts to reposition the Bank’s investment portfolio in
order to reduce exposure to a decrease in interest rates. Recurring non-interest
income amounted to $4.1 million and $3.5 million for the six months ended
June
30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. Net non-recurring losses on the disposition
of
assets totaled $150,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and included
the
$174,000 loss on the sale of securities partially offset by a $24,000
gain on
the disposition of assets.
Non-Interest
Expense.
Total
non-interest expense increased 12% to $5.9 million for the second quarter
of
2006 as compared to $5.3 million for the corresponding period in 2005.
Salary
and employee benefits totaled $3.3 million for the three months ended
June 30,
2006, an increase of 10% from the same period in 2005. The increase in
salary
and employee benefits is due to staffing additions for a new branch and
loan
production office and increased employee incentive expense. Occupancy
expense
increased 3% for the quarter ended June 30, 2006. Other non-interest
expense
increased 24% to $1.7 million for the three months ended June 30, 2006
as
compared to the same period in 2005. The increase in other non-interest
expense
is primarily due to an increase of $148,000 in amortization of the issuance
costs of the trust preferred securities issued in 2001 as a result
of management's decision, made in June 2006, to call these 2001
securities on December 31, 2006.
16
Total
non-interest expense was $11.6 million for the six months ended June
30, 2006,
an increase of 10% over the same period in 2005. Salary and employee
benefits
totaled $6.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2006, an increase
of 8%
over the same period in 2005. The increase in salary and employee benefits
is
primarily due to staffing additions for a new branch and loan production
office
and increased incentive expense. Occupancy expense increased 2% for the
six
months ended June 30, 2006. Other non-interest expense increased 22%
to $3.1
million for the six months ended June 30, 2006 as compared to the same
period in
2005. The increase in other non-interest expense is primarily due to
an increase
in amortization of the issuance costs of the trust preferred securities
issued
in 2001 that management intends to call on December 31, 2006 and non-recurring
expense of $178,000 from a prepayment fee associated with the early termination
of a $5.0 million Federal Home Loan Bank advance during the first quarter
of
2006. Recurring non-interest expense increased 9% to $11.5 million for
the six
months ended June 30, 2006, as compared to $10.6 million for the same
period
last year.
Income
Taxes. The
Company reported income taxes of $1.5 million and $873,000 for the second
quarters of 2006 and 2005, respectively. This represented effective tax
rates of
36% and 35% for the respective periods.
The
Company reported income taxes of $2.8 million and $1.5 million for the
six
months ended June 30, 2006 and 2005, respectively. This represented effective
tax rates of 36% and 34% for the respective periods.
Analysis
of Financial Condition
Investment
Securities. Available-for-sale
securities amounted to $113.2 million at June 30, 2006 compared to $115.2
million at December 31, 2005. This decrease is primarily the result of
paydowns
on mortgage-backed securities, calls and maturities, which were partially
offset
by additional securities purchases. Average investment securities available
for
sale for the six months ended June 30, 2006 amounted to $117.0 million
compared
to $108.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2005.
Loans.
At
June
30, 2006, loans amounted to $607.2 million compared to $566.7 million
at
December 31, 2005, an increase of $40.5 million. Average loans represented
82%
of total earning assets for the six months ended June 30, 2006 and the
year
ended December 31, 2005. Mortgage loans held for sale were $3.4 million
and $2.2
million at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Allowance
for Loan Losses. The
allowance for loan losses reflects management's assessment and estimate
of the
risks associated with extending credit and its evaluation of the quality
of the
loan portfolio. The Bank periodically analyzes the loan portfolio in
an effort
to review asset quality and to establish an allowance for loan losses
that
management believes will be adequate in light of anticipated risks and
loan
losses. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, size, quality and
risk of
loans in the portfolio are reviewed. Other factors considered are:
· |
the
Bank’s loan loss experience;
|
· |
the
amount of past due and non-performing loans;
|
· |
specific
known risks;
|
· |
the
status and amount of other past due and non-performing
assets;
|
· |
underlying
estimated values of collateral securing loans;
|
· |
current
and anticipated economic conditions; and
|
· |
other
factors which management believes affect the allowance for potential
credit losses.
|
An
analysis of the credit quality of the loan portfolio and the adequacy
of the
allowance for loan losses is prepared by the Bank’s credit administration
personnel and presented to the Bank’s Board of Directors on a regular basis. The
allowance is the total of specific reserves allocated to significant
individual
loans plus a general reserve. After individual loans with specific allocations
have been deducted, the general reserve is calculated by applying general
reserve percentages to the nine risk grades within the portfolio. Loans
are
categorized as one of nine risk grades based on management’s assessment of the
overall credit quality of the loan, including payment history, financial
position of the borrower, underlying collateral and internal credit review.
The
general reserve percentages are determined by management based on its
evaluation
of losses inherent in the various risk grades of loans. The allowance
for loan
losses is established through charges to expense in the form of a provision
for
loan losses. Loan losses and recoveries are charged and credited directly
to the
allowance.
The
following table presents the percentage of loans assigned to each risk
grade
along with the general reserve percentage applied to loans in each risk
grade at
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005.
17
LOAN
RISK GRADE ANALYSIS:
|
Percentage
of Loans
|
General
Reserve
|
|||||||||||
By
Risk Grade*
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||
06/30/2006
|
12/31/2005
|
06/30/2006
|
|
12/31/2005
|
|||||||||
Risk
1 (Excellent Quality)
|
13.01%
|
|
14.28%
|
|
0.15%
|
|
0.15%
|
|
|||||
Risk
2 (High Quality)
|
16.99%
|
|
18.16%
|
|
0.50%
|
|
0.50%
|
|
|||||
Risk
3 (Good Quality)
|
59.12%
|
|
56.40%
|
|
1.00%
|
|
1.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
4 (Management Attention)
|
8.06%
|
|
8.38%
|
|
2.50%
|
|
2.50%
|
|
|||||
Risk
5 (Watch)
|
0.99%
|
|
0.88%
|
|
7.00%
|
|
7.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
6 (Substandard)
|
0.70%
|
|
0.42%
|
|
12.00%
|
|
12.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
7 (Low Substandard)
|
0.55%
|
|
0.86%
|
|
25.00%
|
|
25.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
8 (Doubtful)
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
50.00%
|
|
50.00%
|
|
|||||
Risk
9 (Loss)
|
0.00%
|
|
0.00%
|
|
100.00%
|
|
100.00%
|
|
|||||
*Excludes
non-accrual loans
|
At
June
30, 2006 there was one relationship which totaled $1.9 million in the
Watch risk
grade, one relationship which totaled $1.5 million in the Substandard
risk grade
and one relationship which totaled $3.1 million in the Low Substandard
risk
grade. These customers continue to meet payment requirements. These
relationships would not become non-performing assets unless they are
unable to
meet those payment requirements.
An
allowance for loan losses is also established, as necessary, for individual
loans considered to be impaired in accordance with Statement of Financial
Accounting Standards (“SFAS”) No. 114. A loan is considered impaired when, based
on current information and events, it is probable that all amounts due
according
to the contractual terms of the loan will not be collected. Impaired
loans are
measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows, discounted
at
the loan’s effective interest rate, or at the loan’s observable market price, or
the fair value of collateral if the loan is collateral dependent. At
June 30,
2006 and December 31, 2005, the recorded investment in loans that were
considered to be impaired under SFAS No. 114 was approximately $3.4 million
and
$3.5 million, respectively, with related allowance for loan losses of
approximately $420,000 and $478,000, respectively.
The
allowance for loan losses totaled $7.9 million at June 30, 2006 and $7.4
million
at December 31, 2005, which represented 1.30% of total loans outstanding
at June
30, 2006 and 1.31% of total loans outstanding as of December 31, 2005.
The
Bank’s allowance for loan losses is also subject to regulatory examinations
and
determinations as to adequacy, which may take into account such factors
as the
methodology used to calculate the allowance for loan losses and the size
of the
allowance for loan losses compared to a group of peer banks identified
by the
regulators. During their routine examinations of banks, the FDIC and
the North
Carolina Commissioner of Banks may require the Company to recognize additions
to
the allowance based on their judgments about information available to
them at
the time of their examination.
While
it
is the Bank's policy to charge off in the current period loans for which
a loss
is considered probable, there are additional risks of future losses which
cannot
be quantified precisely or attributed to particular loans or classes
of loans.
Because these risks include the state of the economy, management’s judgment as
to the adequacy of the allowance is necessarily approximate and imprecise.
After
review of all relevant matters affecting loan collectability, management
believes that the allowance for loan losses is appropriate.
The
Company grants loans and extensions of credit primarily within the Catawba
Valley region of North Carolina, which encompasses Catawba, Alexander,
Iredell
and Lincoln counties and also in Mecklenburg County. Although the Bank
has a
diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the loan portfolio
is
collateralized by real estate, which is dependent upon the real estate
market.
Non-real estate loans also can be affected by local economic conditions.
At June
30, 2006, approximately 5% of the Company’s portfolio was not secured by any
type of collateral. Unsecured loans generally involve higher credit risk
than
secured loans and, in the event of customer default, the Company has
a higher
exposure to potential loan losses.
Non-performing
Assets. Non-performing
assets totaled $3.9 million at June 30, 2006 or 0.49% of total assets,
compared
to $5.0 million at December 31, 2005, or 0.68% of total assets. Non-accrual
loans were $3.4 million at June 30, 2006 and $3.5 million at December
31, 2005.
As a percentage of total loans outstanding, non-accrual loans were 0.57%
at June
30, 2006 compared to 0.62% at December 31, 2005. Loans ninety days past
due and
still accruing were $33,000 at June 30, 2006 as compared to $946,000
at December
31, 2005. Other real estate owned totaled $380,000 as of June 30, 2006
as
compared to $531,000 at December 31, 2005. The Bank had no repossessed
assets as
of June 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005.
18
Total
non-performing loans, which include non-accrual loans and loans ninety
days past
due and still accruing, were $3.5 million and $4.4 million at June 30,
2006 and
December 31, 2005, respectively. The ratio of non-performing loans to
total
loans was 0.57% at June 30, 2006, as compared to 0.79% at December 31,
2005.
Deposits.
Total
deposits at June 30, 2006 were $610.8 million, an increase of $27.9 million
over
deposits of $582.9 million at December 31, 2005. Core deposits, which
include
non-interest bearing demand deposits, NOW, MMDA, savings and certificates
of
deposits of denominations less than $100,000, increased $4.7 million
to $435.1
million at June 30, 2006 as compared to $430.4 million at December 31,
2005.
Certificates of deposit in amounts of $100,000 or more totaled $175.7
million at June 30, 2006 as compared to $152.4 million at December 31,
2005. NOW, MMDA and savings accounts decreased $12.0 million to
$177.3 million at June 30, 2006 as compared to $183.3 million at December
31,
2005 due to customers transferring balances to certificates of deposits
with
higher rates. At June 30, 2006, brokered deposits amounted to $54.2
million as compared to $40.3 million at December 31, 2005. The increase
in
brokered deposits provided funding for the increased loan demand. Brokered
deposits outstanding as of June 30, 2006 had a weighted average rate
of 4.44%
with a weighted average original term of 13 months.
Borrowed
Funds. Borrowings
from the Federal
Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) totaled $74.1 million at June 30, 2006
compared to $71.6 million at December 31, 2005. The average balance of
FHLB
borrowings for the six months ended June 30, 2006 was $79.3 million compared
to
$65.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2005. At June 30, 2006,
FHLB
borrowings with maturities exceeding one year amounted to $47.1 million.
The
FHLB has the option to convert $17.0 million of the total advances to
a floating
rate and, if converted, the Bank may repay advances without payment of
a
prepayment fee. The Company also has an additional $10.0 million in variable
rate convertible advances, which may be repaid without a prepayment fee
if
converted by the FHLB. At June 30, 2006, the Company had $40.0 million
in a
short term fixed rate advance. The Company had no federal funds purchased
as of
June 30, 2006 or December 31, 2005.
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $2.9 million and $981,000
as of
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
Junior
Subordinated Debentures (related to Trust Preferred Securities).
In
December 2001 the Company formed a wholly owned Delaware statutory trust,
PEBK
Capital Trust I (“PEBK Trust”), which issued $14.0 million of guaranteed
preferred beneficial interests in the Company’s junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures that qualify as Tier 1 capital under Federal Reserve
Board
guidelines. All of the common securities of PEBK Trust are owned by the
Company.
The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the trust
preferred
securities were used by PEBK Trust to purchase $14.4 million of junior
subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay a floating rate equal
to prime
plus 50 basis points. The proceeds received by the Company from the sale
of the
junior subordinated debentures were used for general purposes, primarily
to
provide capital to the Bank. The debentures represent the sole asset
of PEBK
Trust. PEBK Trust is not included in the consolidated financial
statements.
The
trust
preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust accrue and pay quarterly distributions
based on the liquidation value of $50,000 per capital security at a floating
rate of prime plus 50 basis points. The Company has guaranteed distributions
and
other payments due on the trust preferred securities to the extent PEBK
Trust
has funds with which to make the distributions and other payments. The
net
combined effect of all the documents entered into in connection with
the trust
preferred securities is that the Company is liable to make the distributions
and
other payments required on the trust preferred securities.
These
trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of
the
debentures on December 31, 2031, or upon earlier redemption as provided
in the
indenture. The Company has the right to redeem the debentures purchased
by PEBK
Trust, in whole or in part, on or after December 31, 2006. As specified
in the
indenture, if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption
price will be the principal amount and any accrued but unpaid interest.
Management intends to call these trust preferred securities on December
31,
2006. In
June
2006, as a result of management’s decision to call these securities, the
amortization of the related issuance cost was revised so it will be fully
amortized by year end. The remaining unamortized issuance cost at June
30, 2006
was $305,000.
In
June
2006 the Company formed a second wholly owned Delaware statutory trust,
PEBK
Capital Trust II (“PEBK Trust II”), which issued $20.0 million of guaranteed
preferred beneficial interests in the Company’s junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures. All of the common securities of PEBK Trust II are
owned by
the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities
and the
trust preferred securities were used by PEBK Trust II to purchase $20.6
million
of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay a floating
rate
equal to three month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The proceeds received
by the
Company from the sale of the junior subordinated debentures are intended
to be
used to repay the trust preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust in
December
2001 and for general purposes. The debentures represent the sole asset
of PEBK
Trust II. PEBK Trust II is not included in the consolidated
19
financial
statements.
The
trust
preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust II accrue and pay quarterly
at a
floating rate of three month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The Company
has
guaranteed distributions and other payments due on the trust preferred
securities to the extent PEBK Trust II has funds with which to make the
distributions and other payments. The net combined effect of all the
documents
entered into in connection with the trust preferred securities is that
the
Company is liable to make the distributions and other payments required
on the
trust preferred securities.
These
trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of
the
debentures on June 28, 2036, or upon earlier redemption as provided in
the
indenture. The Company has the right to redeem the debentures purchased
by PEBK
Trust II, in whole or in part, on or after June 28, 2011. As specified
in the
indenture, if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption
price will be the principal amount and any accrued but unpaid
interest.
Management
expects to call the PEBK Trust securities and issued the new PEBK Trust
II
securities in an effort to reduce interest expense. Based on interest
rates in
effect at June 30, 2006, the rate on the PEBK Trust securities was 8.75%,
while
the interest rate on the PEBK Trust II securities was 7.11%.
Asset
Liability and Interest Rate Risk Management. The
objective of the Company’s Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk strategies is
to identify and manage the sensitivity of net interest income to changing
interest rates and to minimize the interest rate risk between interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities at various maturities. This is
to be
done in conjunction with the need to maintain adequate liquidity and
the overall
goal of maximizing net interest income.
The Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates through
policies established by the Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) of the Bank. The
ALCO meets monthly and has the responsibility for approving asset/liability
management policies, formulating and implementing strategies to improve
balance
sheet positioning and/or earnings and reviewing the interest rate sensitivity
of
the Company. ALCO tries to minimize interest rate risk between interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities by attempting to minimize wide
fluctuations in net interest income due to interest rate movements. The
ability
to control these fluctuations has a direct impact on the profitability
of the
Company. Management monitors this activity on a regular basis through
analysis
of its portfolios to determine the difference between rate sensitive
assets and
rate sensitive liabilities.
The
Company’s rate sensitive assets are those earning interest at variable rates
and
those with contractual maturities within one year. Rate sensitive assets
therefore include both loans and available-for-sale securities. Rate
sensitive
liabilities include interest-bearing checking accounts, money market
deposit
accounts, savings accounts, time deposits and borrowed funds. The Company’s
balance sheet is asset-sensitive, meaning that in a given period there
will be
more assets than liabilities subject to immediate repricing as interest
rates
change in the market. Because most of the Company’s loans are tied to the prime
rate, they reprice more rapidly than rate sensitive interest-bearing
deposits.
During periods of rising rates, this results in increased net interest
income.
The opposite occurs during periods of declining rates. Average rate sensitive
assets for the six months ended June 30, 2006 totaled $713.8 million,
exceeding
average rate sensitive liabilities of $601.7 million by $112.1
million.
In
order
to assist in achieving a desired level of interest rate sensitivity,
the Company
entered into off-balance sheet contracts that are considered derivative
financial instruments. As of June 30, 2006, the Company had cash flow
hedges
with a notional amount of $150.0 million. These derivative instruments
consist
of four interest rate floor contracts that are used to hedge future cash
flows
of the first $150.0 million of certain variable rate commercial, construction
and home equity loans against the downward effects of their repricing
in the
event of a decreasing rate environment for a period of three years ending
in
July 2008, November 2008, January 2009 and June 2009. If the prime rate
falls
below 6.25% during the term of the contract on the first floor, the Company
will
receive payments based on the $35.0 million notional amount times the
difference
between 6.25% and the weighted average prime rate for the quarter. No
payments
will be received by the Company if the weighted average prime rate is
6.25% or
higher. The Company paid a premium of $161,000 on this contact. On the
second
floor if the prime rate falls below 7.00% during the term of the contract,
the
Company will receive payments based on the $35.0 million notional amount
times
the difference between 7.00% and the weighted average prime rate for
the
quarter. No payments will be received by the Company if the weighted
average
prime rate is 7.00% or higher. The Company paid a premium of $203,000
on this
contract. On the third floor if the prime rate falls
below 7.50% during the term of the contract, the Company will receive
payments
based on the $45.0 million notional amount times the difference between
7.50%
and the weighted average prime rate for the quarter. No payments will
be
received by the Company if the weighted average prime rate is 7.50% or
higher.
The Company paid a premium of $562,500 on this contract. On the fourth
floor if
the prime rate falls below 8.00% during the term of the contract, the
Company will receive payments based on the $35.0 million notional amount
times
the difference between 8.00% and the weighted average prime rate for
the
quarter. No payments will be received by the Company if the weighted
average
prime
20
rate
is
8.00% or higher. The Company paid a premium of $399,000 on this contract.
The
amortization expense recognized on these four interest rate floor contracts
totaled $131,000 for the six-month period ended June 30, 2006.
The
Company settled two previously outstanding interest rate swap agreements
during
2005. The first swap, with a notional amount of $25.0 million and scheduled
to
mature in April 2006 was sold for a loss of $318,000. The second swap with
a
notional amount of $30.0 million and scheduled to mature in September 2006
was
sold for a loss of $552,000. The losses realized upon settlement are being
recognized over the original term of the agreements and during the six-month
period, ended June 30, 2006, losses of approximately $302,000 were recognized.
The
Bank
utilizes interest rate floors on certain variable rate loans to protect against
further downward movements in the prime rate. At June 30, 2006, the Bank
had
$80.0 million in loans with interest rate floors; however, none of the floors
were in effect pursuant to the terms of the promissory notes on these loans.
The
Bank
also had $24.3 million in loans that are tied to the prime rate and had interest
rate caps in effect pursuant to the terms of the promissory notes on these
loans. The weighted average rate on these loans is 1.69% lower than the indexed
rate on the promissory notes without the interest rate caps.
Liquidity.
The
objectives of the Company’s liquidity policy are to provide for the availability
of adequate funds to meet the needs of loan demand, deposit withdrawals,
maturing liabilities and to satisfy regulatory requirements. Both deposit
and
loan customer cash needs can fluctuate significantly depending upon business
cycles, economic conditions and yields and returns available from alternative
investment opportunities. In addition, the Company’s liquidity is affected by
off-balance sheet commitments to lend in the form of unfunded commitments
to
extend credit and standby letters of credit. As of June 30, 2006 such unfunded
commitments to extend credit were $144.5 million, while commitments in the
form
of standby letters of credit totaled $3.2 million.
The
Company uses several sources to meet its liquidity requirements. The primary
source is core deposits, which includes demand deposits, savings accounts
and
certificates of deposits of denominations less than $100,000. The Company
considers these to be a stable portion of the Company’s liability mix and the
result of on-going consumer and commercial banking relationships. As of June
30,
2006, the Company’s core deposits totaled $435.1 million, or 71% of total
deposits.
The
other
sources of funding for the Company are through large denomination certificates
of deposit, including brokered deposits, federal funds purchased and FHLB
advances. The Bank is also able to borrow from the Federal Reserve System
on a
short-term basis.
At
June
30, 2006, the Bank had a significant amount of deposits in amounts greater
than
$100,000, including brokered deposits of $54.2 million, which mature over
the
next year. The balance and cost of these deposits are more susceptible to
changes in the interest rate environment than other deposits.
The
Bank
had a line of credit with the FHLB equal to 20% of the Bank’s total assets, with
an outstanding balance of $74.1 million at June 30, 2006. The remaining
availability at FHLB was $53.8 million at June 30, 2006. The Bank also had
the
ability to borrow up to $26.0 million for the purchase of overnight federal
funds from three correspondent financial institutions as of June 30,
2006.
The
liquidity ratio for the Bank, which is defined as net cash, interest bearing
deposits with banks, federal funds sold, certain investment securities and
certain FHLB advances available under the line of credit, as a percentage
of net
deposits (adjusted for deposit runoff projections) and short-term liabilities
was 35.01% at June 30, 2006 and 36.81% at December 31, 2005. The minimum
required liquidity ratio as defined in the Bank’s Asset/Liability and Interest
Rate Risk Management Policy is 20%.
Contractual
Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. The
Company’s contractual obligations and other commitments as of June 30, 2006 and
December 31, 2005 are summarized in the table below. The Company’s contractual
obligations include the repayment of principal and interest related to FHLB
advances and junior subordinated debentures, as well as certain payments
under
current lease agreements. Other commitments include commitments to extend
credit. Because not all of these commitments to extend credit will be drawn
upon, the actual cash requirements are likely to be significantly less than
the
amounts reported for other commitments below.
21
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS:
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|||||||
June
30, 2006
|
December
31, 2005
|
||||||
Contractual
Cash Obligations
|
|||||||
Long-term
borrowings
|
$
|
27,000
|
67,000
|
||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
35,052
|
14,433
|
|||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
8,281
|
8,599
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
70,333
|
90,032
|
||||
Other
Commitments
|
|||||||
Commitments
to extend credit
|
$
|
144,450
|
133,409
|
||||
Standby
letters of credit and financial guarantees written
|
3,184
|
2,692
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
147,634
|
136,101
|
The
Company enters into derivative contracts to manage various financial risks.
A
derivative is a financial instrument that derives its cash flows, and therefore
its value, by reference to an underlying instrument, index or referenced
interest rate. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value on the
consolidated balance sheet with the fair value representing the net present
value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market interest
rates as of the balance sheet date. Derivative contracts are written in amounts
referred to as notional amounts, which only provide the basis for calculating
payments between counterparties and are not a measure of financial risk.
Further
discussions of derivative instruments are included above in the section entitled
“Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk Management”.
Capital
Resources. Shareholders’
equity at June 30, 2006 was $56.8 million compared to $54.4 million at December
31, 2005. At June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, unrealized losses, net
of
taxes, amounted to $2.9 million and $1.4 million, respectively. The increase
in
unrealized losses at June 30, 2006 is primarily attributable to a decrease
in
the market value of available for sale securities and derivative instruments.
Management expects that accumulated comprehensive income (loss) will continue
to
fluctuate due to changes in the market value of available for sale investments
securities and derivative instruments caused by changes in market interest
rates. Annualized return on average equity for the six months ended June
30,
2006 was 16.91% compared to 9.96% for the year ended December 31, 2005. Total
cash dividends paid during the six months ended June 30, 2006 amounted to
$797,000 as compared to total cash dividends of $690,000 paid for the first
six
months of 2005.
Since
implementation of a stock repurchase plan implemented in November 2005, which
expires in November 2006, the Company has repurchased $425,000, or 17,500
shares
of its common stock.
Under
the
regulatory capital guidelines, financial institutions are currently required
to
maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, with a Tier
1
risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater. Tier 1 capital is generally
defined
as shareholders' equity and Trust Preferred Securities less all intangible
assets and goodwill. The Company’s Tier 1 capital ratio was 11.73% and 11.02% at
June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively. Total risk-based capital
is
defined as Tier 1 capital plus supplementary capital. Supplementary capital,
or
Tier 2 capital, consists of the Company's allowance for loan losses, not
exceeding 1.25% of the Company's risk-weighted assets. Total risk-based capital
ratio is therefore defined as the ratio of total capital (Tier 1 capital
and
Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets. The Company’s total risk-based capital
ratio was 15.00% and 12.19% at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005,
respectively. In addition to the Tier 1 and total risk-based capital
requirements, financial institutions are also required to maintain a leverage
ratio of Tier 1 capital to total average assets of 4.0% or greater. The
Company’s Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 10.52% and 9.84% at June 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005, respectively.
The
Bank’s Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 10.38% and 10.46% at June 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005, respectively. The total risk-based capital ratio for
the
Bank was 11.55% and 11.64% at June 30, 2006 and December 31, 2005, respectively.
The Bank’s Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 9.29% and 9.33% at June 30, 2006
and December 31, 2005, respectively.
A
bank is
considered to be "well capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital
ratio
of 10.0 % or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, and
has a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater. Based upon these guidelines, the
Bank
was considered to be "well capitalized" at June 30, 2006.
22
Item
3.
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There
have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures
about market risks as of June 30, 2006 from that presented in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2005.
23
Item
4.
Controls
and Procedures
The
Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
(the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this report. Based
on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording, processing,
summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required to be
disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the
Exchange Act.
There
have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under
the
Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that
have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
24
PART
II.
OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1.
Legal Proceedings
In the opinion of management, the Company is not involved in any pending
legal
proceedings other than routine, non-material proceedings occurring in
the
ordinary course of business.
Item
1A.
Risk Factors
There are no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed
in
the Company’s Form 10-K in response to Item 1A. to Part I to Form 10-K, filed
with
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 24, 2006.
Item
2. Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|||||||||||||
Period
|
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price
Paid
per
Share
|
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part
of
Publicly
Announced
Plans
or
Programs
|
Maximum
Number
(or
Approximate
Dollar
Value) of
Shares
that May
Yet
Be Purchased
Under
the Plans or
Programs
|
|||||||||
April
1 - 30, 2006
|
300
|
$
|
28.26
|
-
|
$
|
1,575,000
|
|||||||
May
1 - 31, 2006
|
149
|
29.25
|
-
|
1,575,000
|
|||||||||
June
1 - 30, 2006
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,575,000
|
|||||||||
Total
|
449
|
$
|
28.59
|
-
|
$
|
1,575,000
|
Item
3.
Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not
applicable
Item
4.
Submission of
Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
(a) | Annual Shareholders' Meeting - May 4, 2006 | |
(b) | Directors elected at the meeting are as follows: Robert C. Abernethy, James S. Abernethy, | |
Larry E. Robinson and William Gregory Terry. | ||
(c) | Continuing directors include: Douglas S. Howard, Billy L. Price, Jr., M.D., John W. | |
Lineberger, Jr., Gary E. Matthews, Dan Ray Timmerman, Sr. and Benjamin I. Zachary. | ||
(d) | At the May 4, 2006 Annual Shareholders' Meeting the following items were submitted to a vote | |
of shareholders: |
Vote
For
|
Withhold
Authority
|
||
Robert
C. Abernethy
|
3,213,496
|
|
72,739
|
James
S. Abernethy
|
3,213,530
|
|
72,722
|
Larry
E. Robinson
|
3,213,530
|
|
72,722
|
William
Gregory Terry
|
3,213,530
|
|
72,722
|
Ratification of appointment of Independent Registered Public Accountants - Porter Keadle | ||
Moore, LLP | ||
Votes For - 3,221,220, Votes Against - 9,460, Votes Abstained - 55,571 |
25
Item
5. Other
Information
Not applicable
Item
6. Exhibits
Exhibit
(3)(i)
|
Articles
of Incorporation of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.,
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (3)(i) to the Form 8-A filed with the
Securities and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on September 2, 1999
|
||
Exhibit
(3)(ii)
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (3)(ii) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2004
|
||
Exhibit
(4)
|
Specimen
Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4)
to the Form
|
|
8-A
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September
2,
1999
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(a)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Tony W. Wolfe
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(a) to the Form 10-K filed with
the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(b)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Joseph F. Beaman,
Jr.
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(b) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(c)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and William D. Cable
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(d) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(d)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Lance A. Sellers
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(e) to the Form 10-K filed with
the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(e)
|
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus Stock Ownership and
Long
|
|
Term
Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(f)
to the Form
10-K
|
||
filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(f)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and A. Joseph Lampron
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(g) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(g)
|
Peoples
Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral Plan, incorporated
by reference to
|
|
Exhibit
(10)(h) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange
|
||
Commission
on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(h)
|
Rabbi
Trust for the Peoples Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral
Plan,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(i)
|
Description
of Service Recognition Program maintained by Peoples Bank,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003
|
||
Exhibit
(14)
|
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics of Peoples Bancorp of North
Carolina,
Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (14) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2005
|
||
Exhibit
(31)(a)
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to section 302 of
the
|
|
Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(31)(b)
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to section 302 of
the
Sarbanes-
|
26
Oxley Act of 2002 | ||
Exhibit (32) | Certification Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section | |
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 |
27
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.
|
||
August
10, 2006
|
/s/
Tony W. Wolfe
|
|
Date
|
Tony
W. Wolfe
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
August
10, 2006
|
/s/
A. Joseph Lampron
|
|
Date
|
A.
Joseph Lampron
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal
Financial and Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
28