PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC - Quarter Report: 2007 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|||||||||||||
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
|||||||||||||
FORM
10-Q
|
|||||||||||||
[
X
] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||||||||||||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||||||||||||
For
the quarterly period ended: March
31, 2007
|
|||||||||||||
OR
|
|||||||||||||
[
]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||||||||||||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||||||||||||
For
the transition period from __________ to __________
|
|||||||||||||
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
|
|||||||||||||
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|||||||||||||
North
Carolina
|
|||||||||||||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|||||||||||||
000-27205
|
56-2132396
|
||||||||||||
(Commission
File No.)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
||||||||||||
518
West C Street, Newton, North Carolina
|
28658
|
||||||||||||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
||||||||||||
(828)
464-5620
|
|||||||||||||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
|||||||||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required
to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject
to
such filing requirements for the past 90 days.
|
|||||||||||||
Yes
|
X
|
No
|
|||||||||||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large Accelerate Filer | Accelerated Filer | X | Non-Accelerated |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
|
|||||
Yes
|
No
|
X
|
|||
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes
of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
3,842,043
shares of common stock, outstanding at April
30,
2007.
|
INDEX
|
|||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
PAGE(S)
|
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at March 31, 2007 (Unaudited) and
|
|||
December
31, 2006
|
3
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings for the three months ended March
|
|||
31,
2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months
|
|||
ended
March 31, 2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March
|
|||
31,
2007 and 2006 (Unaudited)
|
6-7
|
||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
8-9
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
||
and
Results of Operations
|
10-17
|
||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
18
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
19
|
|
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
20
|
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
20
|
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
20
|
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
20
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
20
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
20
|
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
20-22
|
|
Signatures
|
23
|
||
Certifications
|
24-26
|
Statements
made in this Form 10-Q, other than those concerning historical information,
should be considered forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities
Litigation Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve risks and
uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of management
and on
the information available to management at the time that this Form 10-Q was
prepared. These statements can be identified by the use of words like “expect,”
“anticipate,” “estimate,” and “believe,” variations of these words and other
similar expressions. Readers should not place undue reliance on forward-looking
statements as a number of important factors could cause actual results to
differ
materially from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ materially include, but are not limited to,
(1)
competition in the markets served by Peoples Bank, (2) changes in the interest
rate environment, (3) general national, regional or local economic conditions
may be less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a
deterioration in credit quality and the possible impairment of collectibility
of
loans, (4) legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting
standards, (5) significant changes in the federal and state legal and regulatory
environments and tax laws, (6) the impact of changes in monetary and fiscal
policies, laws, rules and regulations and (7) other risks and factors identified
in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including but not limited to those described in Peoples Bancorp of North
Carolina, Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2006.
2
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
|||||||
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
||||||
Assets
|
2007
|
|
2006
|
||||
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$
|
23,759,037
|
18,860,318
|
||||
Federal
funds sold
|
21,147,000
|
2,640,000
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
44,906,037
|
21,500,318
|
|||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
118,745,494
|
117,581,000
|
|||||
Other
investments
|
6,755,849
|
7,295,449
|
|||||
Total
securities
|
125,501,343
|
124,876,449
|
|||||
Loans
|
644,991,947
|
651,381,129
|
|||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(8,620,074
|
)
|
(8,303,432
|
)
|
|||
Net
loans
|
636,371,873
|
643,077,697
|
|||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
13,865,730
|
12,816,385
|
|||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
6,589,206
|
6,532,406
|
|||||
Accrued
interest receivable and other assets
|
10,115,218
|
10,144,283
|
|||||
Total
assets
|
$
|
837,349,407
|
818,947,538
|
||||
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
|||||||
Deposits:
|
|||||||
Non-interest
bearing demand
|
$
|
112,777,011
|
101,393,142
|
||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings
|
188,580,644
|
174,577,641
|
|||||
Time,
$100,000 or more
|
187,766,348
|
194,176,291
|
|||||
Other
time
|
170,055,451
|
163,673,215
|
|||||
Total
deposits
|
659,179,454
|
633,820,289
|
|||||
Demand
notes payable to U.S. Treasury
|
853,415
|
1,600,000
|
|||||
Securities
sold under agreement to repurchase
|
9,237,489
|
6,417,803
|
|||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
77,000,000
|
89,300,000
|
|||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
20,619,000
|
20,619,000
|
|||||
Accrued
interest payable and other liabilities
|
5,177,720
|
4,355,073
|
|||||
Total
liabilities
|
772,067,078
|
756,112,165
|
|||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
|||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value; authorized
|
|||||||
5,000,000
shares; no shares issued
|
|||||||
and
outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
|||||
Common
stock, no par value; authorized
|
|||||||
20,000,000
shares; issued and
|
|||||||
outstanding
3,834,659 shares in 2007
|
|||||||
and
3,830,634 shares in 2006
|
51,193,812
|
51,122,147
|
|||||
Retained
earnings
|
14,811,487
|
12,484,463
|
|||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(722,970
|
)
|
(771,237
|
)
|
|||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
65,282,329
|
62,835,373
|
|||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$
|
837,349,407
|
818,947,538
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
3
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings
|
|||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|||||||
2007
|
|
2006
|
|||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
||||||
Interest
income:
|
|||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$
|
13,600,189
|
11,132,184
|
||||
Interest
on federal funds sold
|
125,495
|
4,142
|
|||||
Interest
on investment securities:
|
|||||||
U.S.
Government agencies
|
1,130,079
|
1,021,674
|
|||||
States
and political subdivisions
|
219,494
|
192,750
|
|||||
Other
|
124,969
|
133,553
|
|||||
Total
interest income
|
15,200,226
|
12,484,303
|
|||||
Interest
expense:
|
|||||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings deposits
|
912,443
|
674,737
|
|||||
Time
deposits
|
4,286,403
|
2,987,731
|
|||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
923,490
|
885,690
|
|||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
360,199
|
279,639
|
|||||
Other
|
124,278
|
35,543
|
|||||
Total
interest expense
|
6,606,813
|
4,863,340
|
|||||
Net
interest income
|
8,593,413
|
7,620,963
|
|||||
Provision
for loans losses
|
323,000
|
759,000
|
|||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
8,270,413
|
6,861,963
|
|||||
Non-interest
income:
|
|||||||
Service
charges
|
912,568
|
924,945
|
|||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
487,547
|
396,016
|
|||||
Loss
on sale of securities
|
-
|
(81,800
|
)
|
||||
Mortgage
banking income
|
111,841
|
120,608
|
|||||
Insurance
and brokerage commissions
|
100,657
|
103,900
|
|||||
Miscellaneous
|
509,271
|
465,820
|
|||||
Total
non-interest income
|
2,121,884
|
1,929,489
|
|||||
Non-interest
expense:
|
|||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
3,373,166
|
2,843,475
|
|||||
Occupancy
|
1,104,239
|
988,396
|
|||||
Other
|
1,543,641
|
1,475,312
|
|||||
Total
non-interest expenses
|
6,021,046
|
5,307,183
|
|||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
4,371,251
|
3,484,269
|
|||||
Income
taxes
|
1,584,126
|
1,249,200
|
|||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
2,787,125
|
2,235,069
|
||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.48
|
0.39
|
||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
0.48
|
0.38
|
||||
Cash
dividends declared per share
|
$
|
0.08
|
0.07
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
4
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|||||||
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
||||
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
2,787,125
|
2,235,069
|
||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
|||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on securities
|
|||||||
available
for sale
|
(108,395
|
)
|
(678,354
|
)
|
|||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||
sales
of securities available for sale included
|
|||||||
in
net earnings
|
-
|
81,800
|
|||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on derivative
|
|||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
|||||||
hedges
|
123,011
|
(446,705
|
)
|
||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||
derivative
financial instruments qualifying as
|
|||||||
cash
flow hedges included in net earnings
|
-
|
196,101
|
|||||
Total
other comprehensive income (loss),
|
|||||||
before
income taxes
|
14,616
|
(847,158
|
)
|
||||
Income
tax expense (benefit) related to other
|
|||||||
comprehensive
income:
|
|||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on securities
|
|||||||
available
for sale
|
(42,220
|
)
|
(264,218
|
)
|
|||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||
sales
of securities available for sale included
|
|||||||
in
net earnings
|
-
|
31,861
|
|||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on derivative
|
|||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
|||||||
hedges
|
8,569
|
(196,113
|
)
|
||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
|||||||
derivative
financial instruments qualifying as
|
|||||||
cash
flow hedges included in net earnings
|
-
|
76,381
|
|||||
Total
income tax expense (benefit) related to
|
|||||||
other
comprehensive income
|
(33,651
|
)
|
(352,089
|
)
|
|||
Total
other comprehensive income (loss),
|
|||||||
net
of tax
|
48,267
|
(495,069
|
)
|
||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$
|
2,835,392
|
1,740,000
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
5
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|
||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
|||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|||||||
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
||||
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$
|
2,787,125
|
2,235,069
|
||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to
|
|||||||
net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
|||||||
Depreciation,
amortization and accretion
|
367,159
|
360,180
|
|||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
323,000
|
759,000
|
|||||
Loss
on sale of investment securities
|
-
|
81,800
|
|||||
Recognition
of loss on sale of derivative instruments
|
-
|
196,101
|
|||||
Amortization
of deferred gain on sale of premises
|
(5,224
|
)
|
(5,224
|
)
|
|||
Loss
(gain) on sale of repossessed assets
|
62,178
|
(13,368
|
)
|
||||
Stock
option compensation expense
|
1,209
|
1,423
|
|||||
Change
in:
|
|||||||
Mortgage
loans held for sale
|
-
|
(323,300
|
)
|
||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
(56,800
|
)
|
(51,727
|
)
|
|||
Other
assets
|
(14,228
|
)
|
(1,870,200
|
)
|
|||
Other
liabilities
|
822,647
|
215,343
|
|||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
4,287,066
|
1,585,097
|
|||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
|||||||
Purchases
of investment securities available for sale
|
(2,655,477
|
)
|
(3,754,753
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from calls and maturities of investment securities available for
sale
|
1,410,681
|
1,574,444
|
|||||
Proceeds
from sales of investment securities available for sale
|
-
|
2,918,200
|
|||||
Purchases
of other investments
|
(864,400
|
)
|
(3,085,200
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of other investments
|
1,404,000
|
3,091,500
|
|||||
Net
change in loans
|
6,259,122
|
(24,465,589
|
)
|
||||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(1,444,596
|
)
|
(408,152
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from sale of repossessed assets
|
266,703
|
229,126
|
|||||
Purchases
of derivative financial instruments
|
-
|
(562,500
|
)
|
||||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
4,376,033
|
(24,462,924
|
)
|
||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
|||||||
Net
change in deposits
|
25,359,165
|
30,661,357
|
|||||
Net
change in demand notes payable to U.S. Treasury
|
(746,585
|
)
|
(1,351,924
|
)
|
|||
Net
change in securities sold under agreement to repurchase
|
2,819,686
|
2,924,058
|
|||||
Proceeds
from FHLB borrowings
|
34,400,000
|
103,900,000
|
|||||
Repayments
of FHLB borrowings
|
(46,700,000
|
)
|
(106,000,000
|
)
|
|||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
70,455
|
185,495
|
|||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
-
|
(425,000
|
)
|
||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(460,101
|
)
|
(379,995
|
)
|
|||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
14,742,620
|
29,513,991
|
|||||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalent
|
23,405,719
|
6,636,164
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
21,500,318
|
19,815,999
|
|||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$
|
44,906,037
|
26,452,163
|
6
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
|||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, continued
|
|||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2007 and 2006
|
|||||||
2007
|
|
|
2006
|
||||
|
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
|||||||
Interest
|
$
|
6,424,846
|
4,932,390
|
||||
Income
taxes
|
$
|
-
|
319,500
|
||||
Noncash
investing and financing activities:
|
|||||||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on investment securities
|
|||||||
available
for sale, net
|
$
|
66,175
|
(364,197
|
)
|
|||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial
|
|||||||
instruments,
net
|
$
|
(114,442
|
)
|
(130,872
|
)
|
||
Transfer
of loans to other real estate and repossessions
|
$
|
123,702
|
29,610
|
||||
Reclassification
of an investment from other assets
|
|||||||
to
securities available for sale
|
$
|
499,995
|
-
|
||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
7
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes
to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(1)
|
Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples
Bank
(the “Bank”), along with the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples
Investment Services, Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively
called the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
consolidated financial statements in this report are unaudited. In the opinion
of management, all adjustments (none of which were other than normal accruals)
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and results of
operations for the periods presented have been included. Management of the
Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to reporting
of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity with generally
accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition.
Many
of the Company’s accounting policies require significant judgment regarding
valuation of assets and liabilities and/or significant interpretation of
the
specific accounting guidance. A description of the Company’s significant
accounting policies can be found in Note 1 of the notes to consolidated
financial statements in the Company’s 2006 Annual Report to Shareholders which
is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the May 3, 2007 Annual Meeting of
Shareholders.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
June
2006, the Financial
Accounting Standard Board
(“FASB”)
issued Financial Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”) “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes” - an interpretation of SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute
for
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This
interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification, interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
This
interpretation was effective for the Company beginning in January of 2007.
The
Company has assessed the impact of FIN 48 and has determined that there are
no
significant positions taken in the preparation of its tax return that create
any
uncertainties and therefore FIN 48 will not have a material impact on its
financial position or its results of operations.
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS 159), which permits entities
to choose to measure financial instruments and certain other instruments
at fair
value. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of fiscal years that begin
in
November 15, 2007; however, it includes an early adoption provision allowing
entities to adopt within 120 days of their most recent fiscal year-end. The
Company has decided not to implement SFAS 159 until January of
2008.
(2)
|
Allowance for Loan
Losses
|
The
following is an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 and 2006:
|
|
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$
|
8,303,432
|
7,424,782
|
||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
323,000
|
759,000
|
|||||
Less:
|
|||||||
Charge-offs
|
(131,138
|
)
|
(586,039
|
)
|
|||
Recoveries
|
124,780
|
51,621
|
|||||
Net
charge-offs
|
(6,358
|
)
|
(534,418
|
)
|
|||
Balance,
end of period
|
$
|
8,620,074
|
7,649,364
|
8
(3)
|
Net Earnings Per Share
|
Net
earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period while the effects of potential common
shares outstanding during the period are included in diluted earnings per
share.
The average market price during the year is used to compute equivalent shares.
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings
per share” and “diluted earnings per share” for the three months ended March 31,
2007 and 2006 is as follows:
For
the three months ended March 31, 2007
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share
Amount
|
|||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
2,787,125
|
5,748,087
|
$
|
0.48
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
118,926
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
2,787,125
|
5,867,013
|
$
|
0.48
|
For
the three months ended March 31, 2006
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share
Amount
|
|
||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$
|
2,235,069
|
5,687,324
|
$
|
0.39
|
|||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
||||||||||
Stock
options
|
-
|
128,226
|
||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$
|
2,235,069
|
5,815,550
|
$
|
0.38
|
(4)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The
Company has an Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan (the
“Plan”)
whereby certain stock-based rights, such as stock options, restricted stock,
performance units, stock appreciation rights, or book value shares, may be
granted to eligible directors and employees. A total of 389,450 shares were
reserved for possible issuance under this Plan. All rights must be granted
or
awarded within ten years from the 1999 effective date.
Under
the
Plan, the Company granted incentive stock options to certain eligible employees
in order that they may purchase Company stock at a price equal to the fair
market value on the date of the grant. The options granted in 1999 vest over
a
five-year period. Options granted subsequent to 1999 vest over a three-year
period. All options expire ten years after issuance. The
Company did not grant any options during the three months ended March 31,
2007
and 2006.
(5)
|
Subsequent Event
|
On
April
19, 2007, the Board of Directors of the Company authorized a 3-for-2 stock
split
to be paid in conjunction with the Company’s regular cash dividend for the
second quarter of 2007. As a result of the stock split, each shareholder
will
receive three new shares of stock for every two shares of stock they hold
as of
the record date. Shareholders will receive a cash payment in lieu of any
fractional shares resulting from the stock split. The cash dividend will
be paid
based on the number of shares held by shareholders as adjusted by the stock
split. All previously reported per share amounts have been restated to reflect
this stock split.
9
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The
following is a discussion of our financial position and results of operations
and should be read in conjunction with the information set forth under Item
1A
Risk Factors and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto on pages A-26 through A-56 of the Company’s 2006 Annual Report to
Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the May 3, 2007
Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Introduction
Management's
discussion and analysis of earnings and related data are presented to assist
in
understanding the consolidated financial condition and results of operations
of
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Peoples Bancorp is the parent company
of
Peoples Bank (the “Bank”) and a registered bank holding company operating under
the supervision of the Federal Reserve Board. The Bank is a North
Carolina-chartered bank, with offices in Catawba, Lincoln, Alexander
Mecklenburg, Iredell and Union counties, operating under the banking laws
of
North Carolina and the rules and regulations of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation (the “FDIC”).
Overview
Our
business consists principally of attracting deposits from the general public
and
investing these funds in loans secured by commercial real estate, secured
and
unsecured commercial and consumer loans. Our profitability depends primarily
on
our net interest income, which is the difference between the income we receive
on our loan and investment securities portfolios and our cost of funds, which
consists of interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest income
also is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. When interest-earning assets approximate or
exceed
interest-bearing liabilities, any positive interest rate spread will generate
net interest income. Our profitability is also affected by the level of other
income and operating expenses. Other income consists primarily of miscellaneous
fees related to our loans and deposits, mortgage banking income and commissions
from sales of annuities and mutual funds. Operating expenses consist of
compensation and benefits, occupancy related expenses, federal deposit and
other
insurance premiums, data processing, advertising and other
expenses.
Our
operations are influenced significantly by local economic conditions and
by
policies of financial institution regulatory authorities. The earnings on
our
assets are influenced by the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary
and
fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Board of
Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”), inflation,
interest rates, market and monetary fluctuations. Lending activities are
affected by the demand for commercial and other types of loans, which in
turn is
affected by the interest rates at which such financing may be offered. Our
cost
of funds is influenced by interest rates on competing investments and by
rates
offered on similar investments by competing financial institutions in our
market
area, as well as general market interest rates. These factors can cause
fluctuations in our net interest income and other income. In addition, local
economic conditions can impact the credit risk of our loan portfolio, in
that
(1) local employers may be required to eliminate employment positions of
individual borrowers, and small businesses and (2) commercial borrowers may
experience a downturn in their operating performance and become unable to
make
timely payments on their loans. Management evaluates these factors in estimating
its allowance for loan losses, and changes in these economic conditions could
result in increases or decreases to the provision for loan losses.
Our
business emphasis has been to operate as a well-capitalized, profitable and
independent community-oriented financial institution dedicated to providing
quality customer service. We are committed to meeting the financial needs
of the
communities in which we operate. We believe that we can be more effective
in
servicing our customers than many of our non-local competitors because of
our
ability to quickly and effectively provide senior management responses to
customer needs and inquiries. Our ability to provide these services is enhanced
by the stability of our senior management team.
The
Federal Reserve has increased the Federal Funds Rate a total of 3.00% since
December 31, 2004 with the rate set at 5.25% as of March 31, 2007. These
increases had a positive impact on first quarter earnings and should continue
to
have a positive impact on the Bank’s net interest income in the future periods.
The positive impact from the increase in the Federal Funds Rate has been
partially offset by the decrease in earnings realized on interest rate
contracts, including both interest rate swaps and interest rate floors, utilized
by the Company. The swaps were put in place during the time that the Federal
Funds Rate approached 1.00% and helped to offset the decline in income
experienced in 2003 and 2004 because of the reductions in the Federal Funds
Rate
that the Federal Reserve implemented from January 2001 to June 2003. Additional
information regarding the Company’s interest rate contacts is provided below in
the section entitled “Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk Management.”
The
Company qualified as an accelerated filer in accordance with Rule 12b-2 of
the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, effective December 31, 2006. Therefore,
the
Company is now subject to the requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002 (“SOX 404”). The Company incurred additional consulting and audit
expenses in becoming compliant with SOX 404, and will continue to incur
additional audit expenses to comply with SOX 404 going forward. Management
does
not expect expenses related to SOX 404 to have a material impact on the
Company’s financial
10
statements.
The
Bank
opened a new Banco de la Gente office in Union County, in Monroe, North Carolina
in June 2006 in a continuing effort to serve the Latino community. The Bank
also
plans to open new traditional banking offices in Mecklenburg and Iredell
counties, North Carolina in Cornelius and Mooresville, respectively during
2007.
Management expects to continue to open at least one new traditional office
in
Mecklenburg or Iredell counties in each of the next two to three years and
additional Banco de la Gente offices in other metropolitan areas in North
Carolina.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples
Bank,
along with the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples Investment Services,
Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively called the
“Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been
eliminated in consolidation.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial condition.
Many
of the Company’s accounting policies require significant judgment regarding
valuation of assets and liabilities and/or significant interpretation of
specific accounting guidance. The following is a summary of some of the more
subjective and complex accounting policies of the Company. A more complete
description of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be found in
Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the Company’s 2006
Annual Report to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement
for the
May 3, 2007 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The following is a summary of
the
more subjective and complex accounting policies of the Company.
Many
of
the Company’s assets and liabilities are recorded using various techniques that
require significant judgment as to recoverability. The collectability of
loans
is reflected through the Company’s estimate of the allowance for loan losses.
The Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its lending
portfolio to assess overall collectability. In addition, certain assets and
liabilities are reflected at their estimated fair value in the consolidated
financial statements. Such amounts are based on either quoted market prices
or
estimated values derived from dealer quotes used by the Company, market
comparisons or internally generated modeling techniques. The Company’s internal
models generally involve present value of cash flow techniques. The various
techniques are discussed in greater detail elsewhere in management’s discussion
and analysis and the notes to the consolidated financial
statements.
There
are
other complex accounting standards that require the Company to employ
significant judgment in interpreting and applying certain of the principles
prescribed by those standards. These judgments include, but are not limited
to,
the determination of whether a financial instrument or other contract meets
the
definition of a derivative in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting
Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments and Hedging
Activities.” For a more complete discussion of policies, see the notes to the
consolidated financial statements.
In
June
2006, the Financial
Accounting Standard Board
(“FASB”)
issued Financial Interpretation No. 48 (“FIN 48”) “Accounting for Uncertainty in
Income Taxes” - an interpretation of SFAS No. 109. FIN 48 clarifies the
accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in the financial
statements and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute
for
a tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. This
interpretation also provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest
and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure and transition.
This
interpretation was effective for the Company beginning in January of 2007.
The
Company has assessed the impact of FIN 48 and has determined that there
are no
significant positions taken in the preparation of its tax return that create
any
uncertainties and therefore FIN 48 will not have a material impact on its
financial position or its results of operations.
In February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS 159), which permits entities
to choose to measure financial instruments and certain other instruments
at fair
value. SFAS 159 is effective as of the beginning of fiscal years that begin
in
November 15, 2007; however, it includes an early adoption provision allowing
entities to adopt within 120 days of their most recent fiscal year-end. The
Company has decided not to implement SFAS 159 until January of
2008.
Management
of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to
reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets
and
liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity
with generally accepted accounting principles. Actual results could differ
from
those estimates.
Results
of Operations
Summary.
Net
earnings for the first quarter of 2007 were $2.8 million, or $0.48 basic
and
diluted net earnings per share as compared to $2.2 million, or $0.39 basic
net
earnings per share and $0.38 diluted net earnings per for the same
period one year ago. The increase in net earnings is primarily attributable
to
growth in interest-earning assets, which
11
contributed
to increases in net interest income and non-interest income. In addition,
the
Company had a decrease in the provision for loan losses. The increases
in net
interest income and non-interest income and the decrease in the provision
for
loan losses were partially offset by an increase in non-interest
expense.
The
annualized return on average assets was 1.37% for the three months ended
March
31, 2007 compared to 1.22% for the same period in 2006, and annualized return
on
average shareholders' equity was 17.31% for the three months ended March
31,
2007 compared to 16.04% for the same period in 2006.
Net
Interest Income. Net
interest income, the major component of the Company's net earnings, was $8.6
million for the three months ended March 31, 2007, an increase of 13% over
the
$7.6 million earned in the same period in 2006. This increase is attributable
to
Federal Reserve interest rate increases, which resulted in increases to the
prime rate. In addition, the average outstanding balances of loans and
investment securities available-for-sale increased for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 compared to the three months ended March 31, 2006.
Interest
income increased $2.7 million or 22% for the three months ended March 31,
2007
compared with the same period in 2006. The increase was due to an increase
in
the average yield received on loans resulting from Federal Reserve interest
rate
increases combined with an increase in the average outstanding balance of
loans
and investment securities available-for-sale. During the quarter ended March
31,
2007, average loans increased $62.6 million to $643.1 million from $580.5
million for the three months ended March 31, 2006. During the quarter ended
March 31, 2007, average investment securities available-for-sale increased
$2.8
million to $119.8 million from $117.0 million for the three months ended
March
31, 2006.
Interest
expense increased $1.7 million or 36% for the three months ended March 31,
2007
compared with the same period in 2006. The increase in interest expense was
due
to an increase in the cost of funds to 4.11% for the three months ended March
31, 2007 from 3.32% for the same period in 2006, combined with an increase
in
volume of interest-bearing liabilities. The increase in the cost of funds
is
primarily attributable to increases in the average rate paid on interest-bearing
checking and savings accounts and certificates of deposit. The average rate
paid
on interest-bearing checking and savings accounts was 2.09% for the three
months
ended March 31, 2007 as compared to 1.58% for the same period of 2006. The
average rate paid on certificates of deposits was 4.78% for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 compared to 3.75% for the same period one year
ago.
Provision
for Loan Losses. For
the
three months ended March 31, 2007, a contribution of $323,000 was made to
the
provision for loan losses compared to $759,000 for the same period one year
ago.
The decrease in provision for loan losses is primarily attributable to a
decrease in net charge-offs of $528,000.
Non-Interest
Income.
Total
non-interest income was $2.1 million in the first quarter of 2007, an 10%
increase over the $1.9 million for the same period in 2006. This increase
is
primarily due to an increase in other service charges and fees and miscellaneous
other income. Other service charges and fees increased 23% to $488,000 for
the three-month period ended March 31, 2007 when compared to the same period
one
year ago. This increase is primarily attributable to an increase of $48,000
in
check cashing fee income. Mortgage banking income decreased $9,000 during
the
three months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the corresponding period
in
2006. Miscellaneous income was $509,000 for the three months ended March
31,
2007, a 9% increase from $466,000 for the same period in 2006. This increase
in
miscellaneous income was partially attributable to an increase of $48,000
in
debit card fee income primarily associated with increased card usage due
to an
increased number of demand accounts and a $44,000 increase in income from
the
Bank’s Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. subsidiary. These increases were
partially offset by a $76,000 decrease in gains/(losses) on the
disposition of assets.
Non-Interest
Expense.
Total
non-interest expense increased 13% to $6.0 million for the first quarter
of 2007
as compared to $5.3 million for the corresponding period in 2006. Salary
and
employee benefits totaled $3.4 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007, an increase of 19% from the same period in 2006. The increase in salary
and employee benefits is due to normal salary increases and increased employee
incentive expense. Occupancy expense increased 12% for the quarter ended
March
31, 2007 due to an increase in furniture and equipment expense and lease
expense. Other non-interest expense increased 5% to $1.5 million for the
three
months ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the same period in 2006. This
increase in other non-interest expense is attributable to an increase of
$59,000
in professional fees, an increase of $39,000 in debit card expense and an
increase of $39,000 in advertising expense. The Company paid a $178,000
prepayment fee in the first quarter of 2006 on the early termination of a
$5.0
million Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (“FHLB”) advance. This fee was
included in other non-interest expense.
Income
Taxes. The
Company reported income taxes of $1.6 million and $1.2 million for the first
quarters of 2007 and 2006, respectively. This represented an effective tax
rate
of 36% for the respective periods.
12
Analysis
of Financial Condition
Investment
Securities. Available-for-sale
securities amounted to $118.7 million at March 31, 2007 compared to $117.6
million at December 31, 2006. Average investment securities available for
sale
for the three months ended March 31, 2007 amounted to $119.8 million compared
to
$118.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Loans.
At
March
31, 2007, loans amounted to $645.0 million compared to $651.4 million at
December 31, 2006, a decrease of $6.4 million. The decrease in loans is
attributable to a seasonal reduction in commercial construction and acquisition
and development loans during the first quarter of 2007. Average loans
represented 82% of total earning assets for the three months ended March
31,
2007 as compared to 83% for the year ended December 31, 2006. The Company
had no
mortgage loans held for sale at March 31, 2007 and December 31,
2006.
Allowance
for Loan Losses. The
allowance for loan losses reflects management's assessment and estimate of
the
risks associated with extending credit and its evaluation of the quality
of the
loan portfolio. The Bank periodically analyzes the loan portfolio in an effort
to review asset quality and to establish an allowance for loan losses that
management believes will be adequate in light of anticipated risks and loan
losses. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, size, quality and risk
of
loans in the portfolio are reviewed. Other factors considered are:
· |
the
Bank’s loan loss experience;
|
· |
the
amount of past due and non-performing loans;
|
· |
specific
known risks;
|
· |
the
status and amount of other past due and non-performing
assets;
|
· |
underlying
estimated values of collateral securing loans;
|
· |
current
and anticipated economic conditions; and
|
· |
other
factors which management believes affect the allowance for potential
credit losses.
|
Management
uses several measures to assess and monitor the credit risks in the loan
portfolio, including a loan grading system that begins upon loan origination
and
continues until the loan is collected or collectibility becomes doubtful.
Upon
loan origination, the Bank’s originating loan officer evaluates the quality of
the loan and assigns one of nine risk grades, each grade indicating a different
level of loss reserves. The loan officer monitors the loan’s performance and
credit quality and makes changes to the credit grade as conditions warrant.
When
originated or renewed, all loans over a certain dollar amount receive in-depth
reviews and risk assessments by the Bank’s Credit Administration. Before making
any changes in these risk grades, management considers assessments as determined
by the third party credit review firm (as described below), regulatory examiners
and the Bank’s Credit Administration. Any issues regarding the risk assessments
are addressed by the Bank’s senior credit administrators and factored into
management’s decision to originate or renew the loan as well as the level of
reserves deemed appropriate for the loan. The Bank’s Board of Directors reviews,
on a monthly basis, an analysis of the Bank’s reserves relative to the range of
reserves estimated by the Bank’s Credit Administration.
As
an
additional measure, the Bank engages an independent third party to review
the
underwriting, documentation, risk grading analyses and the methodology of
determining the adequacy of the allowance for losses. This independent third
party reviews and evaluates all loan relationships greater than $1.0 million.
The third party’s evaluation and report is shared with management and the Bank’s
Board of Directors.
Management
considers certain commercial loans with weak credit risk grades to be
individually impaired and measures such impairment based upon available cash
flows and the value of the collateral. Allowance or reserve levels are estimated
for all other graded loans in the portfolio based on their assigned credit
risk
grade, type of loan and other matters related to credit risk.
Management
uses the information developed from the procedures described above in evaluating
and grading the loan portfolio. This continual grading process is used to
monitor the credit quality of the loan portfolio and to assist management
in
determining the appropriate levels of the allowance for loan losses.
The
allowance for loan losses is comprised of three components: specific reserves,
general reserves and unallocated reserves. After a loan has been identified
as
impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS No. 114,
“Accounting By Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” When
the
measure of the impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the
loan,
the amount of the impairment is recorded as a specific reserve. These specific
reserves are determined on an individual loan basis based on management’s
current evaluation of the Company’s loss exposure for each credit, given the
payment status, financial condition of the borrower, and value of any underlying
collateral. Loans for which specific reserves are provided are excluded from
the
general allowance calculations as described below. At March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006, the recorded investment in loans that were considered
to be
impaired under SFAS No. 114 was approximately $8.3 million and $7.6 million,
respectively, with related allowance for loan losses of approximately $1.6
million and $1.2 million, respectively.
13
The
general allowance reflects reserves established under the provisions of SFAS
No.
5, “Accounting for Contingencies” for collective loan impairment. These reserves
are based upon historical net charge-offs using the last three years’
experience. This charge-off experience may be adjusted to reflect the effects
of
current conditions. The Bank considers information derived from its loan
risk
ratings and external data related to industry and general economic trends.
The
unallocated allowance is determined through management’s assessment of probable
losses that are in the portfolio but are not adequately captured by the other
two components of the allowance, including consideration of current economic
and
business conditions and regulatory requirements. The unallocated allowance
also
reflects management’s acknowledgement of the imprecision and subjectivity that
underlie the modeling of credit risk. Due to the subjectivity involved in
determining the overall allowance, including the unallocated portion, this
unallocated portion may fluctuate from period to period based on management’s
evaluation of the factors affecting the assumptions used in calculating the
allowance.
Management
considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover the estimated losses
inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio as of the date of the financial
statements. Management believes it has established the allowance in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
and in consideration of the current economic environment. Although management
uses the best information available to make evaluations, significant future
additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic
and
other conditions, thus adversely affecting the operating results of the Company.
There
were no significant changes in the estimation methods or fundamental assumptions
used in the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses for the three months
ended March 31, 2007 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2006. Such
revisions, estimates and assumptions are made in any period in which the
supporting factors indicate that loss levels may vary from the previous
estimates.
Additionally,
various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,
periodically review the Bank’s allowances for loan losses. Such agencies may
require adjustments to the allowances based on their judgments of information
available to them at the time of their examinations.
The
allowance for loan losses at March 31, 2007 amounted to $8.6 million or 1.34%
of
total loans compared to $8.0 million or 1.27% of total loans at December
31,
2006. The increase in the allowance for loan losses is primarily attributable
to
an increase in the allowance for loan loss on impaired loans of approximately
$400,000 from December 31, 2006 to March 31, 2007.
Non-performing
Assets. Non-performing
assets totaled $8.5 million at March 31, 2007 or 1.02% of total assets, compared
to $8.0 million at December 31, 2006, or 0.97% of total assets. Non-accrual
loans were $8.3 million at March 31, 2007 and $7.6 million at December 31,
2006.
As a percentage of total loans outstanding, non-accrual loans were 1.29%
at
March 31, 2007 compared to 1.16% at December 31, 2006. The Bank had loans
ninety
days past due and still accruing at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
of
$78,000. Other real estate owned totaled $134,000 as of March 31, 2007 as
compared to $344,000 at December 31, 2006. The Bank had repossessed assets
as of
March 31, 2007 of $5,000. No repossessed assets were held by the Bank at
December 31, 2006.
Total
non-performing loans, which include non-accrual loans and loans ninety days
past
due and still accruing, were $8.4 million and $7.6 million at March 31, 2007
and
December 31, 2006, respectively. The ratio of non-performing loans to total
loans was 1.30% at March 31, 2007, as compared to 1.17% at December 31, 2006.
Deposits.
Total
deposits at March 31, 2007 were $659.2 million, an increase of $25.4 million
over deposits of $633.8 million at December 31, 2006. Core deposits, which
include non-interest bearing demand deposits, NOW, MMDA, savings and
certificates of deposits of denominations less than $100,000, increased $31.8
million to $471.4 million at March 31, 2007 as compared to $439.6 million
at
December 31, 2006 as a result of the Bank’s continuing focus on growing core
deposits and expanding its market share within its existing markets.
Certificates of deposit in amounts greater than $100,000 or more totaled
$187.8
million at March 31, 2007 as compared to $194.2 million at December 31, 2006.
At
March 31, 2007, brokered deposits amounted to $51.2 million as compared to
$60.0
million at December 31, 2006. The decrease in brokered deposits is attributable
to decreased loan demand. Brokered deposits outstanding as of March 31, 2007
had
a weighted average rate of 5.22% with a weighted average original term of
10
months.
Borrowed
Funds. Borrowings
from the FHLB
totaled $77.0 million at March 31, 2007 compared to $89.3 million at December
31, 2006. The average balance of FHLB borrowings for the three months ended
March 31, 2007 was $80.4 million compared to $74.1 million for the year ended
December 31, 2006. At March 31, 2007, all FHLB borrowings had maturities
exceeding one year. The FHLB has the option to convert $37.0 million of the
total advances to a floating rate and, if converted, the Bank may repay advances
without a prepayment fee. The Company also has an additional $40.0
14
million
in variable rate convertible advances, which may be repaid without a prepayment
fee if converted by the FHLB. The Company had no federal funds purchased
as of
March 31, 2007 or December 31, 2006.
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase amounted to $9.2 million and $6.4 million
as
of March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
Junior
Subordinated Debentures (related to Trust Preferred Securities).
In
June
2006 the Company formed a second wholly owned Delaware statutory trust, PEBK
Capital Trust II (“PEBK Trust II”), which issued $20.0 million of guaranteed
preferred beneficial interests in the Company’s junior subordinated deferrable
interest debentures. All of the common securities of PEBK Trust II are owned
by
the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and
the
trust preferred securities were used by PEBK Trust II to purchase $20.6 million
of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay a floating rate
equal to three month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The proceeds received by
the
Company from the sale of the junior subordinated debentures were used to
repay
in December 2006 the trust preferred securities issued by PEBK Capital Trust
I
in December 2001 and for general purposes. The debentures represent the sole
asset of PEBK Trust II. PEBK Trust II is not included in the consolidated
financial statements.
The
trust
preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust II accrue and pay quarterly at
a
floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The Company has
guaranteed distributions and other payments due on the trust preferred
securities to the extent PEBK Trust II has funds with which to make the
distributions and other payments. The net combined effect of the trust preferred
securities transaction is that the Company is obligated to make the
distributions and other payments required on the trust preferred
securities.
These
trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the
debentures on June 28, 2036, or upon earlier redemption as provided in the
indenture. The Company has the right to redeem the debentures purchased by
PEBK
Trust II, in whole or in part, on or after June 28, 2011. As specified in
the
indenture, if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption
price will be the principal amount and any accrued but unpaid
interest.
Asset
Liability and Interest Rate Risk Management. The
objective of the Company’s Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk strategies is
to identify and manage the sensitivity of net interest income to changing
interest rates and to minimize the interest rate risk between interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities at various maturities. This is to
be
done in conjunction with the need to maintain adequate liquidity and the
overall
goal of maximizing net interest income.
The
Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates through policies
established by the Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) of the Bank. The ALCO
meets monthly and has the responsibility for approving asset/liability
management policies, formulating and implementing strategies to improve balance
sheet positioning and/or earnings and reviewing the interest rate sensitivity
of
the Company. ALCO tries to minimize interest rate risk between interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities by attempting to minimize wide
fluctuations in net interest income due to interest rate movements. The ability
to control these fluctuations has a direct impact on the profitability of
the
Company. Management monitors this activity on a regular basis through analysis
of its portfolios to determine the difference between rate sensitive assets
and
rate sensitive liabilities.
The
Company’s rate sensitive assets are those earning interest at variable rates and
those with contractual maturities within one year. Rate sensitive assets
therefore include both loans and available-for-sale securities. Rate sensitive
liabilities include interest-bearing checking accounts, money market deposit
accounts, savings accounts, time deposits and borrowed funds. The Company’s
balance sheet is asset-sensitive, meaning that in a given period there will
be
more assets than liabilities subject to immediate repricing as interest rates
change in the market. Because most of the Company’s loans are tied to the prime
rate, they reprice more rapidly than rate sensitive interest-bearing deposits.
During periods of rising rates, this results in increased net interest income.
The opposite occurs during periods of declining rates. Average rate sensitive
assets for the three months ended March 31, 2007 totaled $781.2 million,
exceeding average rate sensitive liabilities of $651.7 million by $129.5
million.
In
order
to assist in achieving a desired level of interest rate sensitivity, the
Company
entered into off-balance sheet contracts that are considered derivative
financial instruments. As of March 31, 2007, the Company had cash flow hedges
with a notional amount of $150.0 million. These derivative instruments consist
of four interest rate floor contracts that are used to hedge future cash
flows
from payments on the first $150.0 million of certain variable rate commercial,
construction and home equity loans against the downward effects of their
repricing in the event of a decreasing rate environment for a period of three
years ending in July 2008, November 2008, January 2009 and June 2009. If
the
prime rate falls below 6.25% during the term of the contract on the first
floor,
the Company will receive payments based on the $35.0 million notional amount
times the difference between 6.25% and the weighted average prime rate for
the
quarter. No payments will be received by the Company if the weighted average
prime rate is 6.25% or higher. The Company paid a premium of $161,000 on
this
contact. On the second floor if the prime rate falls below 7.00% during the
term
of the
15
contract,
the Company will receive payments based on the $35.0 million notional amount
times the difference between 7.00% and the weighted average prime rate
for the
quarter. No payments will be received by the Company if the weighted average
prime rate is 7.00% or higher. The Company paid a premium of $203,000 on
this
contract. On the third floor if the prime rate falls below 7.50% during
the term
of the contract, the Company will receive payments based on the $45.0 million
notional amount times the difference between 7.50% and the weighted average
prime rate for the quarter. No payments will be received by the Company
if the
weighted average prime rate is 7.50% or higher. The Company paid a premium
of
$562,500 on this contract. On the fourth floor if the prime rate falls
below
8.00% during the term of the contract, the Company will receive payments
based
on the $35.0 million notional amount times the difference between 8.00%
and the
weighted average prime rate for the quarter. No payments will be received
by the
Company if the weighted average prime rate is 8.00% or higher. The Company
paid
a premium of $399,000 on this contract.
The
Bank
also utilizes interest rate floors on certain variable rate loans to protect
against further downward movements in the prime rate. At March 31, 2007,
the
Bank had $66.0 million in loans with interest rate floors; however, none
of the
floors were in effect pursuant to the terms of the promissory notes on these
loans.
The
Bank
also had $16.8 million in loans that are tied to the prime rate and had interest
rate caps in effect pursuant to the terms of the promissory notes on these
loans. The weighted average rate on these loans is 1.23% lower than the indexed
rate on the promissory notes without the interest rate caps.
Liquidity.
The
objectives of the Company’s liquidity policy are to provide for the availability
of adequate funds to meet the needs of loan demand, deposit withdrawals,
maturing liabilities and to satisfy regulatory requirements. Both deposit
and
loan customer cash needs can fluctuate significantly depending upon business
cycles, economic conditions and yields and returns available from alternative
investment opportunities. In addition, the Company’s liquidity is affected by
off-balance sheet commitments to lend in the form of unfunded commitments
to
extend credit and standby letters of credit. As of March 31, 2007 such unfunded
commitments to extend credit were $168.7 million, while commitments in the
form
of standby letters of credit totaled $4.2 million.
The
Company uses several sources to meet its liquidity requirements. The primary
source is core deposits, which includes demand deposits, savings accounts
and
certificates of deposits of denominations less than $100,000. The Company
considers these to be a stable portion of the Company’s liability mix and the
result of on-going consumer and commercial banking relationships. As of March
31, 2007, the Company’s core deposits totaled $471.4 million, or 72% of total
deposits.
The
other
sources of funding for the Company are through large denomination certificates
of deposit, including brokered deposits, federal funds purchased and FHLB
advances. The Bank is also able to borrow from the Federal Reserve System
on a
short-term basis.
At
March
31, 2007, the Bank had a significant amount of deposits in amounts greater
than
$100,000, including brokered deposits of $51.2 million, which mature over
the
next year. The balance and cost of these deposits are more susceptible to
changes in the interest rate environment than other deposits.
The
Bank
had a line of credit with the FHLB equal to 20% of the Bank’s total assets, with
an outstanding balance of $77.0 million at March 31, 2007. The remaining
availability at FHLB was $58.7 million at March 31, 2007. The Bank also had
the
ability to borrow up to $35.0 million for the purchase of overnight federal
funds from three correspondent financial institutions as of March 31,
2007.
The
liquidity ratio for the Bank, which is defined as net cash, interest bearing
deposits with banks, federal funds sold, certain investment securities and
certain FHLB advances available under the line of credit, as a percentage
of net
deposits (adjusted for deposit runoff projections) and short-term liabilities
was 38.92% at March 31, 2007 and 31.15% at December 31, 2006. The minimum
required liquidity ratio as defined in the Bank’s Asset/Liability and Interest
Rate Risk Management Policy is 20%.
Contractual
Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. The
Company’s contractual obligations and other commitments as of March 31, 2007 and
December 31, 2006 are summarized in the table below. The Company’s contractual
obligations include the repayment of principal and interest related to FHLB
advances and junior subordinated debentures, as well as certain payments
under
current lease agreements. Other commitments include commitments to extend
credit. Because not all of these commitments to extend credit will be drawn
upon, the actual cash requirements are likely to be significantly less than
the
amounts reported for other commitments below.
16
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS:
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|||||||
|
|
|
March
31, 2007
|
December
31, 2006
|
|||
Contractual
Cash Obligations
|
|||||||
Long-term
borrowings
|
$
|
77,000
|
69,500
|
||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
20,619
|
20,619
|
|||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
7,891
|
8,009
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
105,510
|
98,128
|
||||
Other
Commitments
|
|||||||
Commitments
to extend credit
|
$
|
168,739
|
151,697
|
||||
Standby
letters of credit and financial guarantees written
|
4,198
|
4,574
|
|||||
Total
|
$
|
172,937
|
156,271
|
The
Company enters into derivative contracts to manage various financial risks.
A
derivative is a financial instrument that derives its cash flows, and therefore
its value, by reference to an underlying instrument, index or referenced
interest rate. Derivative contracts are carried at fair value on the
consolidated balance sheet with the fair value representing the net present
value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market interest
rates as of the balance sheet date. Derivative contracts are written in amounts
referred to as notional amounts, which only provide the basis for calculating
payments between counterparties and are not a measure of financial risk.
Further
discussions of derivative instruments are included above in the section entitled
“Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk Management”.
Capital
Resources. Shareholders’
equity at March 31, 2007 was $65.3 million compared to $62.8 million at December
31, 2006. At March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, unrealized losses, net
of
taxes, amounted to $723,000 and $771,000, respectively. The decrease in
unrealized losses at March 31, 2007 is primarily attributable to an increase
in
the market value of available for sale securities and derivative instruments.
Management expects that accumulated comprehensive income (loss) will continue
to
fluctuate due to changes in the market value of available for sale investments
securities and derivative instruments caused by changes in market interest
rates. Annualized return on average equity for the three months ended March
31,
2007 was 17.31% compared to 14.68% for the year ended December 31, 2006.
Total
cash dividends paid during the three months ended March 31, 2007 amounted
to
$460,000 as compared to total cash dividends of $380,000 paid for the first
three months of 2006.
In
November 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up
to $2.0 million in common shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock
effective through the end of November 2007. No shares have been repurchased
under the current plan.
Under
the
regulatory capital guidelines, financial institutions are currently required
to
maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, with a Tier
1
risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater. Tier 1 capital is generally
defined
as shareholders' equity and Trust Preferred Securities less all intangible
assets and goodwill. Tier 1 capital at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006
includes $20.0 million in trust preferred securities. The Company’s Tier 1
capital ratio was 11.85% and 11.70% at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. Total risk-based capital is defined as Tier 1 capital plus
supplementary capital. Supplementary capital, or Tier 2 capital, consists
of the
Company's allowance for loan losses, not exceeding 1.25% of the Company's
risk-weighted assets. Total risk-based capital ratio is therefore defined
as the
ratio of total capital (Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted
assets. The Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 13.04% and 12.86% at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively. In addition to the Tier
1
and total risk-based capital requirements, financial institutions are also
required to maintain a leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total average
assets
of 4.0% or greater. The Company’s Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 10.44% and
10.80% at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
The
Bank’s Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 10.34% and 10.21% at March 31, 2007
and December 31, 2006, respectively. The total risk-based capital ratio for
the
Bank was 11.54% and 11.37% at March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006,
respectively. The Bank’s Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was 9.10% and 9.41% at
March 31, 2007 and December 31, 2006, respectively.
A
bank is
considered to be "well capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital
ratio
of 10.0 % or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater,
and
has a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater. Based upon these guidelines, the
Bank
was considered to be "well capitalized" at March 31, 2007.
17
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
There
have been no material changes in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures
about market risks as of March 31, 2007 from that presented in the Company’s
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2006.
18
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
The Company’s management, with the participation of the Company’s Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness
of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934,
as
amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of the period covered by this
report. Based on such evaluation, the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer have concluded that, as of the end of such period,
the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in recording,
processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely basis, information required
to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under
the
Exchange Act.
There
have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under
the
Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter to which this report relates that
have
materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
19
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
In
the
opinion of management, the Company is not involved in any material pending
legal
proceedings other than routine proceedings occurring in the ordinary course
of
business.
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
There
are
no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the
Company’s Form 10-K in response to Item 1A. to Part I to Form 10-K, filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 15, 2007.
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|||||||||||||
Period
|
Total
Number
of Shares Purchased
|
|
|
Average
Price
Paid
per
Share
|
Total
Number of
Shares
Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans
or
Programs
|
Maximum
Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased
Under the Plans or Programs
|
|||||||
January
1 - 31, 2007
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
|||||||
February
1 - 28, 2007
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,000,000
|
|||||||||
March
1 - 31, 2007
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,000,000
|
|||||||||
Total
|
-
|
$
|
-
|
-
|
$
|
2,000,000
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior
Securities
|
Not applicable
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
No matter was submitted to a vote of the Company’s shareholders during the
quarter ended March 31, 2007.
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
Not applicable
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
Exhibit
(3)(i)
|
Articles
of Incorporation of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.,
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (3)(i) to the Form 8-A filed with the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on September 2, 1999
|
||
Exhibit
(3)(ii)
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (3)(ii) to the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 26, 2004
|
||
Exhibit
(4)
|
Specimen
Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4) to
the Form
8-
|
|
A
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September
2,
1999
|
Exhibit
(10)(a)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Tony W. Wolfe
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(a) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
20
Exhibit
(10)(b)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Joseph F. Beaman,
Jr.
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(b) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(c)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and William D. Cable
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(d) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(d)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Lance A. Sellers
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(e) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(e)
|
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus Stock Ownership and
Long
|
|
Term
Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(f) to
the Form
10-K
|
||
filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2000
|
||
Exhibit (10)(e)(i) | Amendment No. 1 to the Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus Stock | |
Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit | ||
(10)(e)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on | ||
March 15, 2007 | ||
Exhibit
(10)(f)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and A. Joseph Lampron
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(g) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(g)
|
Peoples
Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral Plan, incorporated by reference
to
|
|
Exhibit
(10)(h) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange
|
||
Commission
on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(h)
|
Rabbi
Trust for the Peoples Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral
Plan,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(i)
|
Description
of Service Recognition Program maintained by Peoples Bank,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 27,
2003
|
Exhibit
(10)(j)
|
Capital
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 2006, by and
among
|
|
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc., PEBK Capital Trust II and Bear,
Sterns
|
||
Securities
Corp.
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(k)
|
Amended
and Restated Trust Agreement of PEBK Capital Trust II, dated as
of
|
|
June
28, 2006
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(l)
|
Guarantee
Agreement of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. dated as of
June
|
|
28,
2006
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(m)
|
Indenture,
dated as of June 28, 2006, by and between Peoples Bancorp of
North
|
|
Carolina,
Inc. and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating
to
|
||
Junior
Subordinated Debt Securities Due September 15, 2036
|
||
Exhibit
(14)
|
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (14) to the Form 10-K filed with the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 25, 2005
|
||
Exhibit
(31)(a)
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-
|
|
Oxley
Act of 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(31)(b)
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-
|
|
Oxley
Act of 2002
|
21
Exhibit
(32)
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section
|
|
906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
22
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.
|
||
May
9,
2007
|
/s/
Tony W. Wolfe
|
|
Date
|
Tony
W. Wolfe
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
May
9, 2007
|
/s/
A. Joseph Lampron
|
|
Date
|
A.
Joseph Lampron
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal
Financial and Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
23