PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC - Quarter Report: 2008 September (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|||
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
|||
FORM
10-Q
|
|||
[ X
] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||
For
the quarterly period ended: September 30,
2008
|
|||
OR
|
|||
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||
For
the transition period from __________ to __________
|
|||
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
|
|||
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|||
North
Carolina
|
|||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|||
000-27205
|
56-2132396
|
||
(Commission
File No.)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
||
518
West C Street, Newton, North Carolina
|
28658
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
||
(828)
464-5620
|
|||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area
code)
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
|
Yes |
X
|
No |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition
of “accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the
Exchange Act. (Check one):
|
Large
Accelerate Filer
|
Accelerated
Filer
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer
|
Smaller
Reporting Company
|
X |
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in
Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act).
|
Yes
|
No
|
X |
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the
registrant's classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable
date.
5,539,056 shares
of common stock, outstanding at October 31,
2008.
|
INDEX
|
||||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
PAGE(S)
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at September 30, 2008 (Unaudited) and
|
||||
December
31, 2007
|
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings for the three months ended
|
||||
September
30, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited), and for the nine months
ended
|
||||
September
30, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months
|
||||
ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited), and for the nine months
ended
|
||||
September
30, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the nine months ended
|
||||
September
30, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
6-7
|
|||
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
8-11
|
||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
|||
and
Results of Operations
|
12-24
|
|||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
25
|
||
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
26
|
||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
27
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
27
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
27
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
27
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
27
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
27
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
27-29
|
||
Signatures
|
30
|
|||
Certifications
|
31-33
|
Statements
made in this Form 10-Q, other than those concerning historical information,
should be considered forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities
Litigation Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of
management and on the information available to management at the time that this
Form 10-Q was prepared. These statements can be identified by the use
of words like “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” and “believe,”
variations of these words and other similar expressions. Readers
should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a number of
important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in
the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, (1) competition in
the markets served by Peoples Bank, (2) changes in the interest rate
environment, (3) general national, regional or local economic conditions may be
less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration
in credit quality and the possible impairment of collectibility of loans, (4)
legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting standards,
(5) significant changes in the federal and state legal and regulatory
environments and tax laws, (6) the impact of changes in monetary and fiscal
policies, laws, rules and regulations and (7) other risks and factors identified
in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including but not limited to those described in Peoples Bancorp of North
Carolina, Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007.
2
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
||||||||
September
30,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
Assets
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 24,929,113 | 26,108,437 | |||||
Interest
bearing deposits
|
18,822,322 | 1,539,190 | ||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
2,463,000 | 2,152,000 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
46,214,435 | 29,799,627 | ||||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
115,845,961 | 120,968,358 | ||||||
Other
investments
|
6,302,809 | 6,433,947 | ||||||
Total
securities
|
122,148,770 | 127,402,305 | ||||||
Loans
|
765,103,676 | 722,276,948 | ||||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(9,762,716 | ) | (9,103,058 | ) | ||||
Net
loans
|
755,340,960 | 713,173,890 | ||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
18,531,551 | 18,234,393 | ||||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
6,958,703 | 6,776,379 | ||||||
Accrued
interest receivable and other assets
|
14,827,754 | 11,875,202 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 964,022,173 | 907,261,796 | |||||
Liabilities and
Shareholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||
Non-interest
bearing demand
|
$ | 115,078,272 | 112,071,090 | |||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings
|
213,593,478 | 196,959,895 | ||||||
Time,
$100,000 or more
|
230,884,930 | 203,499,504 | ||||||
Other
time
|
194,310,755 | 181,108,214 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
753,867,435 | 693,638,703 | ||||||
Demand
notes payable to U.S. Treasury
|
1,600,000 | 1,600,000 | ||||||
Securities
sold under agreement to repurchase
|
32,230,836 | 27,583,263 | ||||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
77,000,000 | 87,500,000 | ||||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
20,619,000 | 20,619,000 | ||||||
Accrued
interest payable and other liabilities
|
5,478,633 | 6,219,248 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
890,795,904 | 837,160,214 | ||||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value; authorized
|
||||||||
5,000,000
shares; no shares issued
|
||||||||
and
outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, no par value; authorized
|
||||||||
20,000,000
shares; issued and
|
||||||||
outstanding
5,589,056 shares in 2008
|
||||||||
and
5,624,234 shares in 2007
|
48,142,244 | 48,651,895 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
23,252,402 | 19,741,876 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income
|
1,831,623 | 1,707,811 | ||||||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
73,226,269 | 70,101,582 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$ | 964,022,173 | 907,261,796 | |||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
3
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$ | 12,734,326 | 14,095,485 | 38,407,058 | 41,466,693 | |||||||||||
Interest
on federal funds sold
|
17,634 | 32,634 | 52,350 | 367,331 | ||||||||||||
Interest
on investment securities:
|
||||||||||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies
|
1,065,268 | 1,150,619 | 3,304,971 | 3,411,555 | ||||||||||||
States
and political subdivisions
|
224,765 | 220,344 | 667,546 | 661,536 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
79,740 | 125,663 | 314,946 | 363,625 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest income
|
14,121,733 | 15,624,745 | 42,746,871 | 46,270,740 | ||||||||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||||||||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings deposits
|
807,841 | 1,077,857 | 2,514,458 | 2,975,499 | ||||||||||||
Time
deposits
|
3,535,641 | 4,378,969 | 11,466,705 | 12,983,826 | ||||||||||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
891,083 | 964,334 | 2,721,868 | 2,781,347 | ||||||||||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
232,436 | 371,225 | 789,833 | 1,095,572 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
159,575 | 245,997 | 513,324 | 543,468 | ||||||||||||
Total
interest expense
|
5,626,576 | 7,038,382 | 18,006,188 | 20,379,712 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest income
|
8,495,157 | 8,586,363 | 24,740,683 | 25,891,028 | ||||||||||||
Provision
for loans losses
|
1,035,000 | 296,000 | 2,107,000 | 1,253,000 | ||||||||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
7,460,157 | 8,290,363 | 22,633,683 | 24,638,028 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Service
charges
|
1,410,765 | 1,082,248 | 3,814,247 | 3,017,921 | ||||||||||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
574,937 | 488,737 | 1,842,339 | 1,423,461 | ||||||||||||
Loss
on sale and write-down of securities
|
(140,335 | ) | (367,430 | ) | (140,335 | ) | (561,832 | ) | ||||||||
Mortgage
banking income
|
165,516 | 135,863 | 526,036 | 435,475 | ||||||||||||
Insurance
and brokerage commissions
|
103,612 | 177,140 | 329,987 | 408,704 | ||||||||||||
Miscellaneous
|
391,284 | 490,602 | 1,541,826 | 1,543,955 | ||||||||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
2,505,779 | 2,007,160 | 7,914,100 | 6,267,684 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest
expense:
|
||||||||||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
3,889,129 | 3,235,765 | 11,434,589 | 9,907,668 | ||||||||||||
Occupancy
|
1,227,959 | 1,204,188 | 3,652,236 | 3,518,721 | ||||||||||||
Other
|
2,160,508 | 1,774,127 | 6,234,574 | 4,988,601 | ||||||||||||
Total
non-interest expense
|
7,277,596 | 6,214,080 | 21,321,399 | 18,414,990 | ||||||||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
2,688,340 | 4,083,443 | 9,226,384 | 12,490,722 | ||||||||||||
Income
taxes
|
942,000 | 1,470,800 | 3,233,800 | 4,500,841 | ||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 1,746,340 | 2,612,643 | 5,992,584 | 7,989,881 | |||||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.31 | 0.46 | 1.07 | 1.40 | |||||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.31 | 0.45 | 1.06 | 1.37 | |||||||||||
Cash
dividends declared per share
|
$ | 0.12 | 0.12 | 0.36 | 0.29 | |||||||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
4
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
months ended
|
Nine
months ended
|
|||||||||||||||
September
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 1,746,340 | 2,612,643 | 5,992,584 | 7,989,881 | |||||||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on securities
|
||||||||||||||||
available
for sale
|
(636,287 | ) | 2,355,325 | (1,087,122 | ) | 598,395 | ||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
||||||||||||||||
sales
of securities available for sale included
|
||||||||||||||||
in
net earnings
|
140,335 | 367,430 | 140,335 | 561,832 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on derivative
|
||||||||||||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
||||||||||||||||
hedges
|
262,490 | 726,465 | 876,060 | 534,291 | ||||||||||||
Total
other comprehensive income (loss),
|
||||||||||||||||
before
income taxes
|
(233,462 | ) | 3,449,220 | (70,727 | ) | 1,694,518 | ||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit) related to other
|
||||||||||||||||
comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on securities
|
||||||||||||||||
available
for sale
|
(248,009 | ) | 917,399 | (423,434 | ) | 233,075 | ||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for losses on
|
||||||||||||||||
sales
of securities available for sale included
|
||||||||||||||||
in
net earnings
|
54,661 | 143,114 | 54,661 | 218,834 | ||||||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on derivative
|
||||||||||||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
||||||||||||||||
hedges
|
19,400 | 238,374 | 174,235 | 82,184 | ||||||||||||
Total
income tax expense (benefit) related to
|
||||||||||||||||
other
comprehensive income
|
(173,948 | ) | 1,298,887 | (194,538 | ) | 534,093 | ||||||||||
Total
other comprehensive income (loss),
|
||||||||||||||||
net
of tax
|
(59,514 | ) | 2,150,333 | 123,811 | 1,160,425 | |||||||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$ | 1,686,826 | 4,762,976 | 6,116,395 | 9,150,306 | |||||||||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
5
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
||||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 5,992,584 | 7,989,881 | |||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to
|
||||||||
net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation,
amortization and accretion
|
1,213,576 | 1,152,024 | ||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
2,107,000 | 1,253,000 | ||||||
Loss
on sale and write-down of securities
|
140,335 | 561,832 | ||||||
Loss
on sale of premises and equipment
|
1,404 | - | ||||||
Amortization
of deferred gain on sale of premises
|
- | (9,967 | ) | |||||
Loss
on sale of repossessed assets
|
133,885 | 136,759 | ||||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
10,708 | 5,790 | ||||||
Split-dollar
life insurance expense
|
44,827 | - | ||||||
Change
in:
|
||||||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
(182,324 | ) | (181,582 | ) | ||||
Other
assets
|
(1,249,780 | ) | (356,426 | ) | ||||
Other
liabilities
|
(1,267,891 | ) | (293,081 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
6,944,324 | 10,258,230 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of investment securities available for sale
|
(33,484,971 | ) | (13,925,092 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from calls and maturities of investment securities available for
sale
|
14,142,487 | 4,903,721 | ||||||
Proceeds
from sales of investment securities available for sale
|
23,444,994 | 8,362,525 | ||||||
Purchases
of other investments
|
(2,978,362 | ) | (4,383,400 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of other investments
|
3,109,500 | 4,923,000 | ||||||
Net
change in loans
|
(46,600,605 | ) | (39,329,536 | ) | ||||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(1,612,917 | ) | (5,652,751 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of premises and equipment
|
33,545 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of repossessed assets
|
1,560,476 | 425,158 | ||||||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
(42,385,853 | ) | (44,676,375 | ) | ||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Net
change in deposits
|
60,228,732 | 41,628,240 | ||||||
Net
change in securities sold under agreement to repurchase
|
4,647,573 | 13,897,542 | ||||||
Proceeds
from FHLB borrowings
|
68,600,000 | 184,200,000 | ||||||
Repayments
of FHLB borrowings
|
(79,100,000 | ) | (196,500,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
43,948 | 272,166 | ||||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(548,775 | ) | (2,275,200 | ) | ||||
Cash
paid in lieu of fractional shares
|
- | (3,354 | ) | |||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(2,015,141 | ) | (1,656,381 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
51,856,337 | 39,563,013 | ||||||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalent
|
16,414,808 | 5,144,868 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
29,799,627 | 21,500,318 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 46,214,435 | 26,645,186 |
6
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, continued
|
||||||||
Nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 18,221,245 | 20,126,499 | |||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 3,261,800 | 4,224,000 | |||||
Noncash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain on investment securities
|
||||||||
available
for sale, net of tax
|
$ | (578,013 | ) | (708,319 | ) | |||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial
|
||||||||
instruments,
net of tax
|
$ | 701,825 | (452,106 | ) | ||||
Transfer
of loans to other real estate and repossessions
|
$ | 3,209,451 | 478,424 | |||||
Financed
portion of sale of other real estate
|
$ | 882,916 | - | |||||
Reclassification
of an investment from other assets
|
||||||||
to
securities available for sale
|
$ | - | 499,995 | |||||
Reclassification
of an investment from other investments
|
||||||||
to
securities available for sale
|
$ | - | 600,000 | |||||
EITF
06-4 retained earnings reduction
|
$ | 466,917 | - | |||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
7
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples Bank
(the “Bank”), along with the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples
Investment Services, Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively
called the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
consolidated financial statements in this report are unaudited. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (none of which were other than normal
accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and
results of operations for the periods presented have been
included. Management of the Company has made a number of estimates
and assumptions relating to reporting of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial
condition. Many of the Company’s accounting policies require
significant judgment regarding valuation of assets and liabilities and/or
significant interpretation of the specific accounting guidance. A
description of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be found in
Note 1 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2007
Annual Report to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the
May 1, 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) ratified the
conclusions reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on EITF 06-4,
“Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of
Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.” This issue
requires companies to recognize an obligation for either the present value of
the entire promised death benefit or the annual “cost of insurance” required to
keep the policy in force during the post-retirement years. EITF 06-4
was effective for the Company as of January 1, 2008. During first
quarter 2008, the Company made a $467,000 reduction to retained earnings for the
cumulative effect of EITF 06-4 as of January 1, 2008 pursuant to the guidance of
this pronouncement to record the portion of this benefit earned by participants
prior to adoption of this pronouncement. During the third quarter of
2008, the Company recognized $14,000 in expense associated with EITF
06-4. The Company has recognized $45,000 in expense associated with
EITF 06-4 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS
157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 was effective for the Company as of January 1,
2008. This standard had no effect on the Company's financial position
or results of operations.
SFAS 157
establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy for fair value
measurements. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that a company has the ability to access at the
measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included
within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or
liability. The Company’s fair value measurements for items measured at fair
value at September 30, 2008 included:
Fair
Value Measurements September 30, 2008
|
Level
1
Valuation
|
Level
2
Valuation
|
Level
3
Valuation
|
|||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
$ | 115,845,961 | 1,304,428 | 113,291,533 | 1,250,000 | |||
Market
value of derivatives (in other assets)
|
$ | 2,354,133 | - | 2,354,133 | - |
Fair
values of investment securities available for sale are determined by obtaining
quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges when
available. If quoted prices are not available, fair value is
determined using matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely
in the industry to value debt securities without
8
relying
exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying
on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted
securities. Fair values of derivative instruments are determined
using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow
analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects
the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and
uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied
volatilities.
The
following is an analysis of fair value measurements of investment securities
available for sale using Level 3, significant unobservable inputs, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008:
Investment
Securities
Available
for Sale
|
||
Level
3 Valuation
|
||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 250,000 |
Change
in book value
|
- | |
Change
in gain/(loss) realized and unrealized
|
- | |
Purchases/(sales)
|
1,000,000 | |
Transfers
in and/or out of Level 3
|
- | |
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 1,250,000 |
Change
in unrealized gain/(loss) for assets still held in Level 3
|
$ | 0 |
In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114, the Company has specific loan loss
reserves for loans that management has determined to be
impaired. These specific reserves are determined on an individual
loan basis based on management’s current evaluation of the Company’s loss
exposure for each credit, given the appraised value of any underlying
collateral. At September 30, 2008, the Company had specific reserves
of $867,000 in the allowance for loan losses on loans totaling $7.3
million. The Company’s September 30, 2008 fair value measurement for
impaired loans is presented below:
Fair
Value Measurements September 30, 2008
|
Level
1
Valuation
|
Level
2
Valuation
|
Level
3
Valuation
|
Total
Gains/(Losses)
for
the Nine Months
Ended
September 30,
2008
|
||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | 6,406,548 | - | - | 6,406,548 | - | ||||
Other
Real Estate
|
$ | 3,025,921 | - | - | 3,025,921 | - |
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS 159), which permits entities
to choose to measure financial instruments and certain other instruments at fair
value. SFAS 159 was effective for the Company as of January 1,
2008. The Company did not choose this option for any asset or
liability, and therefore SFAS 159 did not have any effect on the Company's
financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 140-3, “Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions.” This FSP
provides guidance on accounting for a transfer of a financial asset and a
repurchase financing under SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing
of Financial Assets and Extinguishments of Liabilities.” This
FSP is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial
position, results of operations or disclosures.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement
No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That
Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13.” This FSP amends SFAS No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements,” to exclude SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” and other
accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of
lease classification or measurement under SFAS No. 13. This FSP is
not expected to have any effect on the Company's financial position, results of
operations or disclosures.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157.” This FSP delays the effective date of SFAS No.
157, “Fair Value Measurements,” for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually). This FSP is not expected to have any effect on the
Company's financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
9
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is an
amendment to SFAS No. 133, which provides for enhanced disclosures about how and
why an entity uses derivatives and how and where those derivatives and related
hedged items are reported in the entity’s financial statements. SFAS
161 is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009. As this is a
disclosure related standard, this standard is not expected to have any effect on
the Company's financial position or results of operations, and will result in
additional disclosures related to the Company’s derivatives.
In
September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 133-1 and FIN
45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment
of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45 and Clarification of
the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161.” This FSP is an
amendment to SFAS No. 133, which provides for enhanced disclosure requirements
for credit risk derivatives. This FSP is not expected to have any
effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or
disclosures.
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of
a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active.” This
FSP clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” in a
market that is not active. This FSP is not expected to have any
effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or
disclosures.
(2)
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses
|
The
following is an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007:
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 9,103,058 | 8,303,432 | |||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
2,107,000 | 1,253,000 | ||||||
Less:
|
||||||||
Charge-offs
|
(1,667,687 | ) | (1,178,791 | ) | ||||
Recoveries
|
220,345 | 309,392 | ||||||
Net
charge-offs
|
(1,447,342 | ) | (869,399 | ) | ||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 9,762,716 | 8,687,033 |
(3)
|
Net
Earnings Per Share
|
Net
earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period while the effects of potential common
shares outstanding during the period are included in diluted earnings per
share. The average market price during the year is used to compute
equivalent shares.
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings
per share” and “diluted earnings per share” for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2008 is as follows:
For the three months
ended September 30, 2008
|
|||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 1,746,340 | 5,589,056 | $ | 0.31 | ||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||
Stock
options
|
- | 46,726 | |||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 1,746,340 | 5,635,782 | $ | 0.31 | ||||
For the nine months
ended September 30, 2008
|
|||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 5,992,584 | 5,600,109 | $ | 1.07 | ||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||
Stock
options
|
- | 64,544 | |||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 5,992,584 | 5,664,653 | $ | 1.06 |
10
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings
per share” and “diluted earnings per share” for the three and nine months ended
September 30, 2007 is as follows:
For the three months
ended September 30, 2007
|
|||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 2,612,643 | 5,675,701 | $ | 0.46 | ||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||
Stock
options
|
- | 108,387 | |||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 2,612,643 | 5,784,088 | $ | 0.45 | ||||
For the nine months
ended September 30, 2007
|
|||||||||
Net
Earnings
|
Common
Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
|||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 7,989,881 | 5,723,276 | $ | 1.40 | ||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||
Stock
options
|
- | 114,293 | |||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 7,989,881 | 5,837,570 | $ | 1.37 |
(4)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The
Company has an Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
whereby certain stock-based rights, such as stock options, restricted stock,
performance units, stock appreciation rights, or book value shares, may be
granted to eligible directors and employees. A total of 636,637
shares are currently reserved for possible issuance under this
Plan. All rights must be granted or awarded within ten years
from the May 13, 1999 effective date of the Plan.
Under the
Plan, the Company granted incentive stock options to certain eligible employees
in order that they may purchase Company stock at a price equal to the fair
market value on the date of the grant. The options granted in 1999
vest over a five-year period. Options granted subsequent to 1999 vest
over a three-year period. All options expire ten years after
issuance. The Company did not grant any options during the three and
nine months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007.
The
Company granted 3,000 shares of restricted stock in 2007 at a grant date fair
value of $17.40 per share. The Company granted 1,750 shares of restricted stock
during the nine months ended September 30, 2008 at a grant date fair value of
$12.80 per share. The Company recognizes compensation expense on the restricted
stock over the period of time the restrictions are in place (three years from
the grant date for the grants to date). The amount of expense
recorded each period reflects the changes in the Company’s stock price during
the period. As of September 30, 2008, there was $40,000 of total
unrecognized compensation cost related to restricted stock grants, which is
expected to be recognized over a period of three years.
11
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
The
following is a discussion of our financial position and results of operations
and should be read in conjunction with the information set forth under Item 1A
Risk Factors and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto on pages A-27 through A-56 of the Company’s 2007 Annual
Report to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the May 1,
2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Introduction
Management's
discussion and analysis of earnings and related data are presented to assist in
understanding the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Peoples Bancorp is the parent company of
Peoples Bank (the “Bank”) and a registered bank holding company operating under
the supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
“Federal Reserve”). The Bank is a North Carolina-chartered bank, with offices in
Catawba, Lincoln, Alexander, Mecklenburg, Iredell, Union and Wake counties,
operating under the banking laws of North Carolina and the rules and regulations
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”).
Overview
Our
business consists principally of attracting deposits from the general public and
investing these funds in loans secured by commercial real estate, secured and
unsecured commercial and consumer loans. Our profitability depends primarily on
our net interest income, which is the difference between the income we receive
on our loan and investment securities portfolios and our cost of funds, which
consists of interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest income
also is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. When interest-earning assets approximate or exceed
interest-bearing liabilities, any positive interest rate spread will generate
net interest income. Our profitability is also affected by the level of other
income and operating expenses. Other income consists primarily of miscellaneous
fees related to our loans and deposits, mortgage banking income and commissions
from sales of annuities and mutual funds. Operating expenses consist of
compensation and benefits, occupancy related expenses, federal deposit and other
insurance premiums, data processing, advertising and other
expenses.
Our
operations are influenced significantly by local economic conditions and by
policies of financial institution regulatory authorities. The earnings on our
assets are influenced by the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and
fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal
Reserve, inflation, interest rates, market and monetary
fluctuations. Lending activities are affected by the demand for
commercial and other types of loans, which in turn is affected by the interest
rates at which such financing may be offered. Our cost of funds is
influenced by interest rates on competing investments and by rates offered on
similar investments by competing financial institutions in our market area, as
well as general market interest rates. These factors can cause fluctuations in
our net interest income and other income. In addition, local economic conditions
can impact the credit risk of our loan portfolio, in that (1) local employers
may be required to eliminate employment positions of individual borrowers and
(2) commercial borrowers may experience a downturn in their operating
performance and become unable to make timely payments on their loans. Management
evaluates these factors in estimating its allowance for loan losses, and changes
in these economic conditions could result in increases or decreases to the
provision for loan losses.
Our
business emphasis has been to operate as a well-capitalized, profitable and
independent community-oriented financial institution dedicated to providing
quality customer service. We are committed to meeting the financial needs of the
communities in which we operate. We believe that we can be more effective in
servicing our customers than many of our non-local competitors because of our
ability to quickly and effectively provide senior management responses to
customer needs and inquiries. Our ability to provide these services is enhanced
by the stability of our senior management team.
The
Company qualified as an accelerated filer in accordance with Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, effective December 31,
2006. Therefore, the Company was subject to the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX 404”). The
Company incurred additional consulting and audit expenses in becoming compliant
with SOX 404, and will continue to incur additional audit expenses to comply
with SOX 404 when SOX 404 becomes applicable to smaller reporting
companies. Management does not expect expenses related to SOX 404 to
have a material impact on the Company’s financial statements. The
Company qualified as a smaller reporting company effective June 30, 2008, due to
a decrease in market capitalization. Management does not expect
significant cost savings from this change in filing status, as certification of
the effectiveness of internal controls by management will still be
required.
The
Emergency Economic Stabilization Act of 2008 was enacted in October 2008 in
response to the current financial crisis. Two key components of this
act are the Troubled Assets Relief Program (“TARP”) and the Capital Purchase
Program (“CPP”). The TARP allows financial institutions to sell
troubled assets to the U.S. Treasury. The Company will not
participate in the TARP. The CPP allows qualifying financial
institutions to issue senior preferred shares to the
Treasury. The senior preferred shares will qualify as Tier 1
capital and will pay a cumulative dividend rate of 5 percent per annum for the
first five years and will reset to a rate of 9 percent per annum after year
five. The senior
12
preferred
shares will be non-voting, other than class voting rights on matters that could
adversely affect the shares. The senior preferred shares will be
callable at par after three years. Prior to the end of three years,
the senior preferred may be redeemed with the proceeds from a qualifying equity
offering of any Tier 1 perpetual preferred or common stock. Treasury may also
transfer the senior preferred shares to a third party at any time. In
conjunction with the purchase of senior preferred shares, Treasury will receive
warrants to purchase common stock with an aggregate market price equal to 15
percent of the senior preferred investment. The exercise price on the
warrants will be the market price of the participating institution's common
stock at the time of issuance, calculated on a 20-trading day trailing
average. Companies participating in the CPP must adopt the Treasury’s
standards for executive compensation and corporate governance. The
Company is currently evaluating its participation in the
CPP.
The Bank
opened a new office in Mecklenburg County, in Cornelius, North Carolina in June
2007 and a new office in Iredell County, in Mooresville, North Carolina in
January 2008. Also in January 2008, the Bank opened a new Banco de la
Gente office in Wake County, in Raleigh, North Carolina in a continuing effort
to serve the Latino community. While there are no additional
traditional offices planned in 2008, management will consider opening at least
one new traditional office in Mecklenburg or Iredell counties in the next two to
three years and additional Banco de la Gente offices in metropolitan areas in
North Carolina.
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples Bank,
along with the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples Investment Services,
Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively called the
“Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial
condition. Many of the Company’s accounting policies require
significant judgment regarding valuation of assets and liabilities and/or
significant interpretation of specific accounting guidance. A more
complete description of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be
found in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Company’s 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy
Statement for the May 1, 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The
following is a summary of the more subjective and complex accounting policies of
the Company.
Many of
the Company’s assets and liabilities are recorded using various techniques that
require significant judgment as to recoverability. The collectibility
of loans is reflected through the Company’s estimate of the allowance for loan
losses. The Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews
of its lending portfolio to assess overall collectibility. In
addition, certain assets and liabilities are reflected at their estimated fair
value in the consolidated financial statements. Such amounts are
based on either quoted market prices or estimated values derived from dealer
quotes used by the Company, market comparisons or internally generated modeling
techniques. The Company’s internal models generally involve present
value of cash flow techniques. The various techniques are discussed
in greater detail elsewhere in management’s discussion and analysis and the
notes to the consolidated financial statements.
There are
other complex accounting standards that require the Company to employ
significant judgment in interpreting and applying certain of the principles
prescribed by those standards. These judgments include, but are not
limited to, the determination of whether a financial instrument or other
contract meets the definition of a derivative in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities.” For a more complete discussion of policies,
see the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) ratified the
conclusions reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on EITF 06-4,
“Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of
Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.” This issue
requires companies to recognize an obligation for either the present value of
the entire promised death benefit or the annual “cost of insurance” required to
keep the policy in force during the post-retirement years. EITF 06-4
was effective for the Company as of January 1, 2008. During first
quarter 2008, the Company made a $467,000 reduction to retained earnings for the
cumulative effect of EITF 06-4 as of January 1, 2008 pursuant to the guidance of
this pronouncement to record the portion of this benefit earned by participants
prior to adoption of this pronouncement. During the third quarter of
2008, the Company recognized $14,000 in expense associated with EITF
06-4. The Company has recognized $45,000 in expense associated with
EITF 06-4 for the nine months ended September 30, 2008.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS
157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 was effective for the Company as of January 1,
2008. This standard had no
13
effect on
the Company's financial position or results of operations.
SFAS 157
establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy for fair value
measurements. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that a company has the ability to access at the
measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included
within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or
liability. The Company’s fair value measurements for items measured at fair
value at September 30, 2008 included:
Fair
Value Measurements September 30, 2008
|
Level
1
Valuation
|
Level
2
Valuation
|
Level
3
Valuation
|
|||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
$ | 115,845,961 | 1,304,428 | 113,291,533 | 1,250,000 | |||
Market
value of derivatives (in other assets)
|
$ | 2,354,133 | - | 2,354,133 | - |
Fair values of investment securities
available for sale are determined by obtaining quoted prices on nationally
recognized securities exchanges when available. If quoted prices are
not available, fair value is determined using matrix pricing, which is a
mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities
without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but
rather by relying on the securities’ relationship to other benchmark quoted
securities. Fair values of derivative instruments are determined
using widely accepted valuation techniques including discounted cash flow
analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis reflects
the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to maturity, and
uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate curves and implied
volatilities.
The
following is an analysis of fair value measurements of investment securities
available for sale using Level 3, significant unobservable inputs, for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008:
Investment
Securities
Available
for Sale
|
|||
Level
3 Valuation
|
|||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 250,000 | |
Change
in book value
|
- | ||
Change
in gain/(loss) realized and unrealized
|
- | ||
Purchases/(sales)
|
1,000,000 | ||
Transfers
in and/or out of Level 3
|
- | ||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 1,250,000 | |
Change
in unrealized gain/(loss) for assets still held in Level 3
|
$ | 0 |
In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114, the Company has specific loan loss
reserves for loans that management has determined to be
impaired. These specific reserves are determined on an individual
loan basis based on management’s current evaluation of the Company’s loss
exposure for each credit, given the appraised value of any underlying
collateral. At September 30, 2008, the Company had specific reserves
of $867,000 in the allowance for loan losses on loans totaling $7.3
million. The Company’s September 30, 2008 fair value measurement for
impaired loans is presented below:
Fair
Value
Measurements
September
30, 2008
|
Level
1
Valuation
|
Level
2
Valuation
|
Level
3
Valuation
|
Total
Gains/(Losses) for the
Nine
Months Ended
September
30, 2008
|
||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | 6,406,548 | - | - | 6,406,548 | - | ||||
Other
Real Estate
|
$ | 3,025,921 | - | - | 3,025,921 | - |
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS 159), which permits entities
to choose to measure financial instruments and certain other instruments at fair
value. SFAS 159 was effective for the Company as of January 1,
2008. The Company did not choose this option for any asset or
liability, and therefore SFAS 159 did not have any effect on the Company's
financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 140-3, “Accounting for Transfers of
Financial Assets and Repurchase Financing Transactions.” This FSP
provides guidance on accounting for a transfer of a financial asset and a
repurchase financing under SFAS No. 140, “Accounting for Transfers and Servicing
of Financial Assets and
14
Extinguishments
of Liabilities.” This FSP is not expected to have a material
effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or
disclosures.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-1, “Application of FASB Statement
No. 157 to FASB Statement No. 13 and Other Accounting Pronouncements That
Address Fair Value Measurements for Purposes of Lease Classification or
Measurement under Statement 13.” This FSP amends SFAS No. 157, “Fair
Value Measurements,” to exclude SFAS No. 13, “Accounting for Leases” and other
accounting pronouncements that address fair value measurements for purposes of
lease classification or measurement under SFAS No. 13. This FSP is
not expected to have any effect on the Company's financial position, results of
operations or disclosures.
In
February 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-2, “Effective Date of FASB
Statement No. 157.” This FSP delays the effective date of SFAS No.
157, “Fair Value Measurements,” for nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial
liabilities, except for items that are recognized or disclosed at fair value in
the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least
annually). This FSP is not expected to have any effect on the
Company's financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is an
amendment to SFAS No. 133, which provides for enhanced disclosures about how and
why an entity uses derivatives and how and where those derivatives and related
hedged items are reported in the entity’s financial statements. SFAS
161 is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009. As this is a
disclosure related standard, this standard is not expected to have any effect on
the Company's financial position or results of operations, and will result in
additional disclosures related to the Company’s derivatives.
In
September 2008, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) FAS No. 133-1 and FIN
45-4, “Disclosures about Credit Derivatives and Certain Guarantees: An Amendment
of FASB Statement No. 133 and FASB Interpretation No. 45 and Clarification of
the Effective Date of FASB Statement No. 161.” This FSP is an
amendment to SFAS No. 133, which provides for enhanced disclosure requirements
for credit risk derivatives. This FSP is not expected to have any
effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or
disclosures.
In
October 2008, the FASB issued FSP FAS No. 157-3, “Determining the Fair Value of
a Financial Asset When the Market for That Asset Is Not Active.” This
FSP clarifies the application of SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements,” in a
market that is not active. This FSP is not expected to have any
effect on the Company's financial position, results of operations or
disclosures.
Management
of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to
reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity
with GAAP. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Results
of Operations
Summary. Net
earnings for the third quarter of 2008 were $1.7 million, or $0.31 basic and
diluted net earnings per share as compared to $2.6 million, or $0.46 basic net
earnings per share and $0.45 diluted net earnings per share for the same period
one year ago. The decrease in net earnings is attributable to a
decrease in net interest income, an increase in provision for loan losses and an
in increase in non-interest expense, which were partially offset by an increase
in non-interest income.
The
annualized return on average assets was 0.74% for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to 1.22% for the same period in 2007, and annualized
return on average shareholders' equity was 9.40% for the three months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to 15.35% for the same period in 2007.
Net
earnings for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 were $6.0 million, or
$1.07 basic net earnings per share and $1.06 diluted net earnings per share as
compared to $8.0 million, or $1.40 basic net earnings per share and $1.37
diluted net earnings per share for the same period in 2007. The
decrease in net earnings for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 is
primarily attributable to a decrease in net interest income, an increase in the
provision for loan losses and an increase in non-interest expense, which were
partially offset by an increase in non-interest income.
The
annualized return on average assets was 0.87% and 1.28% for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Annualized return on
average shareholders’ equity was 10.56% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 compared to 15.41% for the same period in 2007.
Net Interest
Income. Net interest income, the major component of the
Company's net earnings, was $8.5 million for the three months ended September
30, 2008, a decrease of 1% from the $8.6 million earned in the same period in
2007.
15
This
decrease is primarily attributable to a 275 basis point reduction in the Bank’s
prime commercial lending rate from September 30, 2007 to September 30,
2008. The decrease in loan interest income resulting from a decline
in prime rate was partially offset by an increase in income from derivative
instruments.
Interest
income decreased $1.5 million or 10% for the three months ended September 30,
2008 compared with the same period in 2007. The decrease was due to a
275 basis point reduction in the Bank’s prime commercial lending rate, which was
partially offset by an increase in the average outstanding balance of loans and
income from interest rate derivative contracts. Net income from
derivative instruments was $907,000 for the three months ended September 30,
2008 when compared to a net loss of $114,000 for the same period in
2007. The average yield on earning assets for the quarters ended
September 30, 2008 and 2007 was 6.43% and 7.82%, respectively. During
the quarter ended September 30, 2008, average loans increased $84.8 million to
$757.4 million from $672.6 million for the three months ended September 30,
2007. During the quarter ended September 30, 2008, average investment
securities available-for-sale decreased $7.0 million to $113.5 million from
$120.5 million for the three months ended September 30, 2007.
Interest
expense decreased $1.4 million or 20% for the three months ended September 30,
2008 compared with the same period in 2007. The average rate paid on
interest-bearing checking and savings accounts was 1.57% for the three months
ended September 30, 2008 as compared to 2.27% for the same period of
2007. The average rate paid on certificates of deposits was 3.40% for
the three months ended September 30, 2008 compared to 4.86% for the same period
one year ago.
Net
interest income for the nine-month period ended September 30, 2008 was $24.7
million, a decrease of 4% from net interest income of $25.9 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2007. This decrease is primarily
attributable to a reduction in the Bank’s prime commercial lending
rate. The decrease in loan interest income resulting from a decline
in prime rate was partially offset by an increase in income from derivative
instruments.
Interest
income decreased $3.5 million or 8% to $42.7 million for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 compared to $46.3 million for the same period in
2007. The decrease was primarily due to a decrease in the average
yield received on loans resulting from Federal Reserve interest rate decreases,
which were partially offset by an increase in the average outstanding balance of
loans and income from interest rate derivative contracts. Net income
from derivative instruments was $2.2 million for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to a net loss of $323,000 for the same period of
2007. The average yield earned on loans, including fees, was 6.95%
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to 8.47% for the same
period of 2007. During the nine months ended September 30, 2008,
average loans increased $83.8 million to $738.0 million from $654.2 million for
the same period in 2007. Average investment securities available for
sale decreased $4.5 million to $115.9 million in the nine months ended September
30, 2008 compared to the same period in 2007. All other
interest-earning assets including federal funds sold decreased to an average of
$12.6 million in the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from $17.5 million in
the same period in 2007. The tax equivalent yield on average earning
assets decreased to 6.68% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as
compared to 7.92% for the nine months ended September 30, 2007.
Interest
expense decreased 12% to $18.0 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 compared to $20.4 million for the corresponding period in
2007. The decrease in interest expense was due to a decrease in the
cost of funds to 3.29% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 from 4.15%
for the same period in 2007, partially offset by an increase in the volume of
interest-bearing liabilities. The decrease in the cost of funds is
primarily attributable to decreases in the average rate paid on interest-bearing
deposits. The average rate paid on interest-bearing checking and
savings accounts was 1.67% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 as
compared to 2.17% for the same period in 2007. The average rate paid
on certificates of deposits was 3.83% for the nine months ended September 30,
2008 from 4.83% for the same period one year ago.
Provision for Loan
Losses. For the three months ended September 30, 2008, a
contribution of $1.0 million was made to the provision for loan losses compared
to $296,000 for the same period one year ago. The increase in
provision for loan losses is primarily attributable to a $5.2 million increase
in non-performing assets from September 30, 2007 to September 30, 2008, an
increase in net charge-offs to $914,000 from $123,000 and increased loan
growth. Net charge-offs in the quarter ended September 30, 2008
included charge-offs of $501,000 on loans to a local builder whose loans were
foreclosed upon in the same quarter. The Bank had $3.2 million in
Other Real Estate Owned at September 30, 2008, of which $2.2 million was from
loans to a local builder on three residential properties. The largest
property is a home with a current book value of $1.3 million after the Bank paid
$1.0 million to the holder of the first mortgage at foreclosure.
For the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 a contribution of $2.1 million was made to
the provision for loan losses compared to a $1.3 million contribution to the
provision for loan losses for the nine months ended September 30,
2007. The increase in the provision for loan losses is primarily
attributable to an increase in non-performing assets, net charge-offs and
increased loan growth.
16
Non-Interest
Income. Total non-interest income was $2.5 million in the
third quarter of 2008 as compared to $2.0 million for the same period of
2007. Increases in components of non-interest income for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 compared to the same period last year were
primarily attributable to increases in service charges and fees and
miscellaneous income. These increases in non-interest income were
combined with a $227,000 decrease in the loss on sale of securities in third
quarter 2008 when compared to third quarter 2007. The loss on the
sale and write-down of securities for the three months ended September 30, 2008
includes a $300,000 write-down of an asset classified as investment securities
available for sale. Management determined the market value of this
investment had decreased significantly and was not a temporary impairment
therefore a write-down was appropriate during the third quarter
2008. The remaining book balance of this asset is less than
$200,000. This asset is a publicly traded bank stock but is not
Federal National Mortgage Association (“FNMA”) or Federal Home Loan Mortgage
Corporation (“FHLMC”). The Company does not own any stock in FNMA or
FHLMC. Service charges increased 30% to $1.4 million for the three
months ended September 30, 2008 when compared to the same period one year
ago. Other service charges and fees increased 18% to $575,000 for the
three-month period ended September 30, 2008 when compared to the same period one
year ago. The increase in service charges and fees is primarily
attributable to growth in the Bank’s deposit base coupled with normal pricing
changes. Mortgage banking income increased to $166,000 during the
three months ended September 30, 2008 from $136,000 for the same period in
2007. Insurance and brokerage commissions decreased to $104,000
during the three months ended September 30, 2008 from $177,000 for the same
period last year. Miscellaneous income was $391,000 for the three
months ended September 30, 2008, a 20% decrease from $491,000 for the same
period in 2007. This decrease in miscellaneous income is primarily
due to a $106,000 increase in losses on sale of Other Real Estate Owned in third
quarter 2008 when compared to third quarter 2007.
Total
non-interest income was $7.9 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, a 26% increase over the $6.3 million for the same period in
2007. This increase is primarily due to an increase in service
charges and fees and mortgage banking income. These increases in
non-interest income were combined with a $421,000 decrease in the loss on sale
and write-down of securities for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 when
compared to the same period last year. Service charges increased 26% to $3.8
million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 when compared to the same
period one year ago. Other service charges and fees increased 29% to
$1.8 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 when compared to the
same period one year ago. The increase in service charges and fees is
primarily attributable to growth in the Bank’s deposit base coupled with normal
pricing changes. Mortgage banking income increased 21% to $526,000
for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 when compared to the same period in
2007 due to an increase in brokered loan activity. Insurance and
brokerage commissions decreased to $330,000 for the nine months ended September
30, 2008 from $409,000 for the same period last year. Miscellaneous
income was $1.5 million for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 and
2007.
Non-Interest
Expense. Total non-interest expense increased 17% to $7.3
million for the third quarter of 2008 as compared to $6.2 million for the
corresponding period in 2007. Salary and employee benefits totaled
$3.9 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008, an increase of 20%
from the same period in 2007. The increase in salary and employee
benefits is due to normal salary increases and expense associated with
additional staff for new branches. Occupancy expense increased 2% for
the quarter ended September 30, 2008. Other non-interest expense
increased 22% to $2.2 million for the three months ended September 30, 2008 as
compared to the same period in 2007. This increase in other
non-interest expense is primarily attributable to increase of $115,000 in FDIC
insurance expense and an increase of $95,000 in deposit program
expense.
Total
non-interest expense was $21.3 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, an increase of 16% over the same period in 2007. Salary and
employee benefits totaled $11.4 million for the nine months ended September 30,
2008, an increase of 15% over the same period in 2007. The increase
in salary and employee benefits is primarily due to normal salary increases and
expenses associated with additional staff for new branches. Occupancy
expense increased 4% for the nine months ended September 30, 2008 due to an
increase in furniture and equipment expense and lease expense associated with
new branches. Other non-interest expense increased 25% to $6.2 million for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the same period in
2007. This increase in other non-interest expense is primarily
attributable to an increase of $342,000 in FDIC insurance expense, an increase
of $283,000 in deposit program expense and an increase of $93,000 in advertising
expense.
Income Taxes. The
Company reported income taxes of $942,000 and $1.5 million for the third
quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. This represented effective
tax rates of 35% and 36% for the respective periods.
The
Company reported income taxes of $3.2 million and $4.5 million for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 and 2007, respectively. This
represented an effective tax rate of 35% and 36% for the respective
periods.
17
Analysis
of Financial Condition
Investment
Securities. Available-for-sale securities amounted to $115.8
million at September 30, 2008 compared to $121.0 million at December 31,
2007. Average investment securities available for sale for the nine
months ended September 30, 2008 amounted to $115.9 million compared to $120.4
million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Loans. At
September 30, 2008, loans amounted to $765.1 million compared to $722.3 million
at December 31, 2007, an increase of $42.8 million. Average loans
represented 85% and 83% of total earning assets for the nine months ended
September 30, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007,
respectively.
Although
the Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the loan
portfolio is collateralized by real estate, which is dependent upon the real
estate market. Real estate mortgage loans include both commercial and
residential mortgage loans. At September 30, 2008, the Company had
$98.6 million in residential mortgage loans, $91.0 million in home equity loans
and $269.2 million in commercial mortgage loans, which include $214.8 million
using commercial property as collateral and $54.4 million using residential
property as collateral. At September 30, 2008, commercial mortgage
loans included $126.5 million in speculative construction and development
loans.
Residential
mortgage loans include $40.2 million made to customers in the Company’s
traditional banking offices and $58.4 million in mortgage loans originated in
the Company’s Latino banking operations. All residential mortgage
loans are originated as fully amortizing loans, with no negative
amortization.
Allowance for Loan
Losses. The allowance for loan losses reflects management's
assessment and estimate of the risks associated with extending credit and its
evaluation of the quality of the loan portfolio. The Bank
periodically analyzes the loan portfolio in an effort to review asset quality
and to establish an allowance for loan losses that management believes will be
adequate in light of anticipated risks and loan losses. In assessing
the adequacy of the allowance, size, quality and risk of loans in the portfolio
are reviewed. Other factors considered are:
·
|
the
Bank’s loan loss experience;
|
·
|
the
amount of past due and non-performing
loans;
|
·
|
specific
known risks;
|
·
|
the
status and amount of other past due and non-performing
assets;
|
·
|
underlying
estimated values of collateral securing
loans;
|
·
|
current
and anticipated economic conditions;
and
|
·
|
other
factors which management believes affect the allowance for potential
credit losses.
|
Management
uses several measures to assess and monitor the credit risks in the loan
portfolio, including a loan grading system that begins upon loan origination and
continues until the loan is collected or collectibility becomes doubtful. Upon
loan origination, the Bank’s originating loan officer evaluates the quality of
the loan and assigns one of nine risk grades, each grade indicating a different
level of loss reserves. The loan officer monitors the loan’s performance and
credit quality and makes changes to the credit grade as conditions warrant. When
originated or renewed, all loans over a certain dollar amount receive in-depth
reviews and risk assessments by the Bank’s Credit Administration. Before making
any changes in these risk grades, management considers assessments as determined
by the third party credit review firm (as described below), regulatory examiners
and the Bank’s Credit Administration. Any issues regarding the risk assessments
are addressed by the Bank’s senior credit administrators and factored into
management’s decision to originate or renew the loan. The Bank’s Board of
Directors reviews, on a monthly basis, an analysis of the Bank’s reserves
relative to the range of reserves estimated by the Bank’s Credit
Administration.
As an
additional measure, the Bank engages an independent third party to review the
underwriting, documentation and risk grading analyses. This independent third
party reviews and evaluates all loan relationships greater than $1.0
million. The third party’s evaluation and report is shared with
management and the Bank’s Board of Directors.
Management
considers certain commercial loans with weak credit risk grades to be
individually impaired and measures such impairment based upon available cash
flows and the value of the collateral. Allowance or reserve levels are estimated
for all other graded loans in the portfolio based on their assigned credit risk
grade, type of loan and other matters related to credit risk.
Management
uses the information developed from the procedures described above in evaluating
and grading the loan portfolio. This continual grading process is used to
monitor the credit quality of the loan portfolio and to assist management in
estimating the allowance for loan losses.
The
allowance for loan losses is comprised of three components: specific reserves,
general reserves and unallocated reserves. After a loan has been
identified as impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with
18
SFAS
No. 114, “Accounting By Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” When the measure of the
impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the amount of
the impairment is recorded as a specific reserve. These specific reserves are
determined on an individual loan basis based on management’s current evaluation
of the Company’s loss exposure for each credit, given the appraised value of any
underlying collateral. Loans for which specific reserves are provided are
excluded from the general allowance calculations as described
below. At September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the recorded
investment in loans that were considered to be impaired under SFAS No. 114 was
approximately $7.3 million and $8.0 million, respectively, with related
allowance for loan losses of approximately $867,000 and $1.2 million at
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively.
The
general allowance reflects reserves established under the provisions of SFAS No.
5, “Accounting for Contingencies” for collective loan
impairment. These reserves are based upon historical net charge-offs
using the last three years’ experience. This charge-off experience
may be adjusted to reflect the effects of current conditions. The
Bank considers information derived from its loan risk ratings and external data
related to industry and general economic trends.
The
unallocated allowance is determined through management’s assessment of probable
losses that are in the portfolio but are not adequately captured by the other
two components of the allowance, including consideration of current economic and
business conditions and regulatory requirements. The unallocated allowance also
reflects management’s acknowledgement of the imprecision and subjectivity that
underlie the modeling of credit risk. Due to the subjectivity
involved in determining the overall allowance, including the unallocated
portion, this unallocated portion may fluctuate from period to period based on
management’s evaluation of the factors affecting the assumptions used in
calculating the allowance.
Management
considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover the estimated losses
inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio as of the date of the financial
statements. Management believes it has established the allowance in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
and in consideration of the current economic environment. Although management
uses the best information available to make evaluations, significant future
additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and
other conditions, thus adversely affecting the operating results of the
Company.
There
were no significant changes in the estimation methods or fundamental assumptions
used in the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. Such
revisions, estimates and assumptions are made in any period in which the
supporting factors indicate that loss levels may vary from the previous
estimates.
Additionally,
various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,
periodically review the Bank’s allowances for loan losses. Such agencies may
require adjustments to the allowances based on their judgments of information
available to them at the time of their examinations.
The allowance for loan losses at
September 30, 2008 amounted to $9.8 million or 1.28% of total loans compared to
$9.1 million or 1.26% of total loans at December 31, 2007.
The
following table presents the percentage of loans assigned to each risk grade at
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
LOAN
RISK GRADE ANALYSIS:
|
|||
Percentage
of Loans
|
|||
By
Risk Grade*
|
|||
Risk
Grade
|
09/30/2008
|
12/31/2007
|
|
Risk
1 (Excellent Quality)
|
7.03%
|
11.06%
|
|
Risk
2 (High Quality)
|
16.15%
|
14.06%
|
|
Risk
3 (Good Quality)
|
65.14%
|
62.53%
|
|
Risk
4 (Management Attention)
|
8.49%
|
9.51%
|
|
Risk
5 (Watch)
|
1.30%
|
1.57%
|
|
Risk
6 (Substandard)
|
0.70%
|
0.13%
|
|
Risk
7 (Low Substandard)
|
0.00%
|
0.03%
|
|
Risk
8 (Doubtful)
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
|
Risk
9 (Loss)
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
|
*
Excludes non-accrual loans
|
At
September 30, 2008 there were two relationships exceeding $1.0 million (which
totaled $3.9 million) in the
19
Watch
risk grade, two relationships exceeding $1.0 million (which totaled $4.0
million) in the Substandard risk grade and no relationships exceeding $1.0
million in the Low Substandard risk grade. These customers continue to meet
payment requirements and these relationships would not become non-performing
assets unless they are unable to meet those requirements.
Non-performing
Assets. Non-performing assets totaled $12.6 million at
September 30, 2008 or 1.30% of total assets, compared to $8.5 million at
December 31, 2007, or 0.93% of total assets. Non-accrual loans were
$9.0 million at September 30, 2008 and $8.0 million at December 31,
2007. As a percentage of total loans outstanding, non-accrual loans
were 1.18% at September 30, 2008 compared to 1.11% at December 31,
2007. The increase in non-accrual loans is primarily due to the
inclusion of a $824,000 rental property loan. The Bank had loans 90
days past due and still accruing at September 30, 2008 of
$522,000. At December 31, 2007, the Bank had no loans 90 days past
due and still accruing. Other Real Estate Owned totaled $3.0 million
as of September 30, 2008 as compared to $483,000 at December 31,
2007. At September 30, 2008, Other Real Estate Owned included eleven
residential properties acquired thorough foreclosure totaling $2.8 million, as
compared to three residential properties acquired through foreclosure, totaling
$230,000 at December 31, 2007. Three residential properties, totaling
$2.2 million, in Other Real Estate Owned at September 30, 2008 were from loans
to a local builder that were foreclosed upon in the third
quarter. The largest property is a home with a current book
value of $1.3 million after the Bank paid $1.0 million to the holder of the
first mortgage at foreclosure. The Bank had $1,000 in repossessed
assets as of September 30, 2008 and no repossessed assets as of December 31,
2007.
Total
non-performing loans, which include non-accrual loans and loans 90 days past due
and still accruing, were $9.5 million and $8.0 million at September 30, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. The ratio of non-performing loans to
total loans was 1.24% at September 30, 2008, as compared to 1.11% at December
31, 2007.
Deposits. Total
deposits at September 30, 2008 were $753.9 million, an increase of $60.3 million
over deposits of $693.6 million at December 31, 2007. Core deposits, which
include non-interest bearing demand deposits, NOW, MMDA, savings and
non-brokered certificates of deposits of denominations less than $100,000,
increased $27.4 million to $517.5 million at September 30, 2008 as compared to
$490.1 million at December 31, 2007. The Bank introduced remote
deposit capture for customers in 2007 which has enabled the Bank to gather
additional deposits from several existing customers and has been helpful in
attracting new customers. Certificates of deposit in amounts greater
than $100,000 or more totaled $230.9 million at September 30, 2008 as compared
to $203.5 million at December 31, 2007. At September 30, 2008,
brokered deposits amounted to $65.0 million as compared to $53.9 million at
December 31, 2007. Brokered deposits outstanding as of September 30,
2008 had a weighted average rate of 3.55% with a weighted average original term
of seven months.
Borrowed Funds. Borrowings
from the FHLB
totaled $77.0 million at September 30, 2008 compared to $87.5 million at
December 31, 2007. The average balance of FHLB borrowings for the
nine months ended September 30, 2008 was $79.4 million compared to $80.1 million
for the year ended December 31, 2007. At September 30, 2008, all of
the Bank’s FHLB borrowings had maturities exceeding one year. The
FHLB has the option to convert $72.0 million of the total advances to a floating
rate and, if converted, the Bank may repay advances without a prepayment
fee. The Company also has an additional $5.0 million in variable rate
convertible advances, which may be repaid without a prepayment fee if converted
by the FHLB. The Company had no federal funds purchased as of
September 30, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase were $32.2 million at September 30, 2008
compared to $27.6 million at December 31, 2007.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
(related to Trust Preferred Securities). In June 2006 the
Company formed a wholly owned Delaware statutory trust, PEBK Capital Trust II
(“PEBK Trust II”), which issued $20.0 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial
interests in the Company’s junior subordinated deferrable interest
debentures. All of the common securities of PEBK Trust II are owned
by the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common
securities and the trust preferred securities were used by PEBK Trust II to
purchase $20.6 million of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which
pay a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 163 basis
points. The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of the
junior subordinated debentures were used to repay in December 2006 the trust
preferred securities issued by PEBK Capital Trust I in December 2001 and for
general purposes. The debentures represent the sole asset of PEBK
Trust II. PEBK Trust II is not included in the consolidated financial
statements.
The trust
preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust II accrue and pay quarterly at a
floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The Company
has guaranteed distributions and other payments due on the trust preferred
securities to the extent PEBK Trust II has funds with which to make the
distributions and other payments. The net combined effect of the
trust preferred securities transaction is that the Company is obligated to make
the distributions and other payments required on the trust preferred
securities.
20
These
trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the
debentures on June 28, 2036, or upon earlier redemption as provided in the
indenture. The Company has the right to redeem the debentures
purchased by PEBK Trust II, in whole or in part, on or after June 28,
2011. As specified in the indenture, if the debentures are redeemed
prior to maturity, the redemption price will be the principal amount and any
accrued but unpaid interest.
Asset Liability and Interest Rate
Risk Management. The objective of the Company’s Asset
Liability and Interest Rate Risk strategies is to identify and manage the
sensitivity of net interest income to changing interest rates and to minimize
the interest rate risk between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities at various maturities. This is to be done in conjunction
with the need to maintain adequate liquidity and the overall goal of maximizing
net interest income.
The Company manages its exposure to
fluctuations in interest rates through policies established by the
Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) of the Bank. The ALCO meets
monthly and has the responsibility for approving asset/liability management
policies, formulating and implementing strategies to improve balance sheet
positioning and/or earnings and reviewing the interest rate sensitivity of the
Company. ALCO tries to minimize interest rate risk between
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities by attempting to
minimize wide fluctuations in net interest income due to interest rate
movements. The ability to control these fluctuations has a direct
impact on the profitability of the Company. Management monitors this activity on
a regular basis through analysis of its portfolios to determine the difference
between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive liabilities.
The Company’s rate sensitive assets are
those earning interest at variable rates and those with contractual maturities
within one year. Rate sensitive assets therefore include both loans
and available-for-sale securities. Rate sensitive liabilities include
interest-bearing checking accounts, money market deposit accounts, savings
accounts, time deposits and borrowed funds. The Company’s balance
sheet is asset-sensitive, meaning that in a given period there will be more
assets than liabilities subject to immediate repricing as interest rates change
in the market. Because the majority of the Company’s loans are tied
to the prime rate, they reprice more rapidly than rate sensitive
interest-bearing deposits. During periods of rising rates, this
results in increased net interest income. The opposite occurs during
periods of declining rates. Average rate sensitive assets for the
three months ended September 30, 2008 totaled $866.5 million, exceeding average
rate sensitive liabilities of $731.1 million by $135.4 million.
In order
to assist in achieving a desired level of interest rate sensitivity, the Company
entered into off-balance sheet contracts that are considered derivative
financial instruments. As of September 30, 2008, the Company had cash
flow hedges with a notional amount of $200.0 million. These
derivative instruments consist of four interest rate floor contracts and one
interest rate swap contract. The interest rate floor contracts are
used to hedge future cash flows from payments on the first $150.0 million of
certain variable rate loans against the downward effects of their repricing in
the event of a decreasing rate environment during the terms of the interest rate
floor contracts. If the prime rate falls below the contract rate
during the term of the contract, the Company will receive payments based on
notional amount times the difference between the contract rate and the weighted
average prime rate for the quarter. No payments will be received by
the Company if the weighted average prime rate is equal to or higher than the
contract rate. The interest rate swap contract is used to convert
$50.0 million of variable rate loans to a fixed rate. Under the swap
contract, the Company receives a fixed rate of 6.245% and pays a variable rate
based on the current prime rate (5.00% at September 30, 2008) on the notional
amount of $50.0 million. The swap agreement matures in June
2011. The Company recognized $2.2 million in interest income, net of
premium amortization, from interest rate derivative contracts during the first
nine months of 2008. Based on the current interest rate environment,
it is expected the Company will continue to receive income on these interest
rate contracts throughout 2008. The following tables present
additional information on the Company’s derivative financial
instruments.
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS AS OF SEPTEMBER 30, 2008
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Type
of Derivative
|
Notional
Amount
|
Contract
Rate
|
Premium
|
Year-to-date
Income
(Net
of Premium
Amortization)
|
|||||||
Interest
rate floor contact*
|
$ | - | - | $ | - | $ | 151 | ||||
Interest
rate floor contact
|
35,000 | 7.000% | 203 | 354 | |||||||
Interest
rate floor contact
|
45,000 | 7.500% | 562 | 555 | |||||||
Interest
rate floor contact
|
35,000 | 8.000% | 399 | 604 | |||||||
Interest
rate floor contact
|
35,000 | 7.250% | 634 | 339 | |||||||
Interest
rate swap contact
|
50,000 | 6.245% | - | 209 | |||||||
$ | 200,000 | $ | 1,798 | $ | 2,212 | ||||||
*
Interest rate floor contract matured during third quarter
2008
|
21
FAIR
VALUES OF DERIVATIVES DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS UNDER SFAS
133
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Asset Derivatives | Liability Derivatives | ||||||||||
As
of September 30,
2008
|
As
of December 31,
2007
|
As
of September 30,
2008
|
As
of December 31,
2007
|
||||||||
Balance | Balance | Balance | Balance | ||||||||
Sheet | Fair | Sheet | Fair | Sheet | Fair | Sheet | Fair | ||||
Location | Value | Location | Value | Location | Value | Location | Value | ||||
Interest
rate derivative
|
|||||||||||
contracts
|
Other
assets
|
$
2,354
|
Other
assets
|
$
1,907
|
N/A
|
$ -
|
N/A
|
$ -
|
Included
in the rate sensitive assets are $493.7 million in variable rate loans indexed
to prime rate subject to immediate repricing upon changes by the Federal Open
Market Committee (“FOMC”). The Bank utilizes interest rate floors on
certain variable rate loans to protect against further downward movements in the
prime rate. At September 30, 2008, the Bank had $97.5 million in
loans with interest rate floors. The floors were in effect on $53.5
of these loans pursuant to the terms of the promissory notes on these
loans. The weighted average rate on these loans is 1.04% higher
than the indexed rate on the promissory notes without interest rate
floors.
The Bank
also had $42,000 in loans that are tied to the prime rate that had 6.00%
interest rate caps in effect due to the Soldiers and Sailors’ Civil Relief
Act.
Liquidity. The objectives of
the Company’s liquidity policy are to provide for the availability of adequate
funds to meet the needs of loan demand, deposit withdrawals, maturing
liabilities and to satisfy regulatory requirements. Both deposit and
loan customer cash needs can fluctuate significantly depending upon business
cycles, economic conditions and yields and returns available from alternative
investment opportunities. In addition, the Company’s liquidity is
affected by off-balance sheet commitments to lend in the form of unfunded
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. As of
September 30, 2008 such unfunded commitments to extend credit were $170.1
million, while commitments in the form of standby letters of credit totaled $4.6
million.
The Company uses several sources to
meet its liquidity requirements. The primary source is core deposits,
which includes demand deposits, savings accounts and non-brokered certificates
of deposits of denominations less than $100,000. The Company considers these to
be a stable portion of the Company’s liability mix and the result of on-going
consumer and commercial banking relationships. As of September 30,
2008, the Company’s core deposits totaled $517.5 million, or 69% of total
deposits.
The other sources of funding for the
Company are through large denomination certificates of deposit, including
brokered deposits, federal funds purchased and FHLB advances. The
Bank is also able to borrow from the Federal Reserve Discount Window on a
short-term basis. The Bank added to its liquidity at September 30,
2008 by increasing its borrowing capacity at the Federal Reserve. The
Bank pledged loans receivable totaling $294.4 million and now has the ability to
borrow $224.8 million from the Federal Reserve. The Bank has tested
its access to the line with the Federal Reserve as part of its on-going
liquidity management and now has immediate access to its line of
credit.
At
September 30, 2008, the Bank had a significant amount of deposits in amounts
greater than $100,000, including brokered deposits of $59.5 million, which
mature over the next seven months. The balance and cost of these
deposits are more susceptible to changes in the interest rate environment than
other deposits.
The Bank
had a line of credit with the FHLB equal to 20% of the Bank’s total assets, with
an outstanding balance of $77.0 million at September 30, 2008. The
remaining availability at FHLB was $73.8 million at September 30,
2008. The Bank also had the ability to borrow up to $42.0 million for
the purchase of overnight federal funds from four correspondent financial
institutions as of September 30, 2008.
The
liquidity ratio for the Bank, which is defined as net cash, interest bearing
deposits with banks, federal funds sold, certain investment securities and
certain FHLB advances available under the line of credit, as a percentage of net
deposits (adjusted for deposit runoff projections) and short-term liabilities
was 28.55% at September 30, 2008 and 28.04% at December 31, 2007. The
minimum required liquidity ratio as defined in the Bank’s Asset/Liability and
Interest Rate Risk Management Policy is 20%.
Contractual Obligations and
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. The Company’s contractual
obligations and other commitments as of September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007
are summarized in the table below. The Company’s
22
contractual
obligations include the repayment of principal and interest related to FHLB
advances and junior subordinated debentures, as well as certain payments under
current lease agreements. Other commitments include commitments to
extend credit. Because not all of these commitments to extend credit
will be drawn upon, the actual cash requirements are likely to be significantly
less than the amounts reported for other commitments below.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS:
|
||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
||||
September
30, 2008
|
December
31, 2007
|
|||
Contractual
Cash Obligations
|
||||
Long-term
borrowings
|
$ | 77,000 | 77,000 | |
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
20,619 | 20,619 | ||
Operating
lease obligations
|
4,755 | 5,290 | ||
Total
|
$ | 102,374 | 102,909 | |
Other
Commitments
|
||||
Commitments
to extend credit
|
$ | 170,743 | 190,654 | |
Standby
letters of credit and financial guarantees written
|
4,584 | 3,894 | ||
Total
|
$ | 175,327 | 194,548 |
The
Company enters into derivative contracts to manage various financial
risks. A derivative is a financial instrument that derives its cash
flows, and therefore its value, by reference to an underlying instrument, index
or referenced interest rate. Derivative contracts are carried at fair
value on the consolidated balance sheet with the fair value representing the net
present value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market
interest rates as of the balance sheet date. Derivative contracts are
written in amounts referred to as notional amounts, which only provide the basis
for calculating payments between counterparties and are not a measure of
financial risk. Further discussions of derivative instruments are
included above in the section entitled “Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk
Management”.
Capital
Resources. Shareholders’ equity at September 30, 2008 was
$73.2 million compared to $70.1 million at December 31, 2007. At
September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, unrealized gains (losses), net of
taxes, amounted to unrealized gains of $1.8 million and $1.7 million,
respectively. Annualized return on average equity for the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 was 10.56% compared to 16.03% for the year ended
December 31, 2007. Total cash dividends paid during the nine months
ended September 30, 2008 amounted to $2.0 million as compared to total cash
dividends of $1.7 million paid for the first nine months of 2007.
In
November 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up
to $2.0 million in common shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock
through its existing Stock Repurchase Plan effective through the end of November
2007. During 2007, the Company repurchased $1.9 million, or 100,000
shares, of its common stock under this plan.
In August
2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 75,000
common shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock through its existing
Stock Repurchase Plan effective through the end of August 2008. The
Company has repurchased 75,497 shares, or $1.2 million, of its common stock
under this plan. The Board of Directors ratified the purchase of 497
additional shares in March 2008.
In March
2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to
100,000 common shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock through its
existing Stock Repurchase Plan effective through the end of March
2009. The Company has repurchased 15,500 shares, or $199,000, of its
common stock under this plan as of September 30, 2008. The Company
repurchased 50,000 shares, or $577,500, of its common stock under this plan on
October 27, 2008.
Under the
regulatory capital guidelines, financial institutions are currently required to
maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, with a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater. Tier 1 capital is
generally defined as shareholders' equity and Trust Preferred Securities less
all intangible assets and goodwill. Tier 1 capital at September 30,
2008 and December 31, 2007 includes $20.0 million in trust preferred
securities. The Company’s Tier 1 capital ratio was 10.94% and 11.03%
at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Total
risk-based capital is defined as Tier 1 capital plus supplementary
capital. Supplementary capital, or Tier 2 capital, consists of the
Company's allowance for loan losses, not exceeding 1.25% of the Company's
risk-weighted assets. Total risk-based capital ratio is therefore defined as the
ratio of total capital (Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted
assets. The Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 12.10% and
12.16% at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. In
addition to the Tier 1 and total risk-based capital requirements, financial
institutions are also required to maintain a leverage ratio of Tier 1
23
capital
to total average assets of 4.0% or greater. The Company’s Tier 1
leverage capital ratio was 9.92% and 10.43% at September 30, 2008 and December
31, 2007, respectively.
The
Bank’s Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 9.91% and 9.80% at September 30, 2008
and December 31, 2007, respectively. The total risk-based capital
ratio for the Bank was 11.08% and 10.93% at September 30, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively. The Bank’s Tier 1 leverage capital ratio
was 8.98% and 9.26% at September 30, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
A bank is
considered to be "well capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio
of 10.0 % or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, and
has a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater. Based upon these guidelines,
the Bank was considered to be "well capitalized" at September 30,
2008.
24
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
|
There have been no material changes
in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks as of
September 30, 2008 from that presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form
10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
25
Item
4T.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
The Company’s management, with the
participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation,
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on
a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
There have not been any changes in the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter
to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
26
PART
II.
|
OTHER INFORMATION
|
Item
1.
|
Legal Proceedings
|
In the
opinion of management, the Company is not involved in any material pending legal
proceedings other than routine proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of
business.
Item
1A.
|
Risk Factors
|
There are
no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the
Company’s Form 10-K in response to Item 1A. to Part I to Form 10-K, filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2008.
Item
2.
|
Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|||||||||
Period
|
Total
Number
of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price
Paid
per
Share
|
Total
Number
of Shares Purchased as Part of
Publicly
Announced
Plans
or Programs
|
Maximum
Number of Shares that
May
Yet Be Purchased
Under
the Plans or Programs
|
|||||
July
1 - 31, 2008
|
- | $ | - | - | 84,500 | ||||
August
1 - 31, 2008
|
- | - | - | 84,500 | |||||
September
1 - 30, 2008
|
2,510 | 11.59 | - | 84,500 | |||||
Total
|
2,510 | $ | 11.59 | - |
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
Not
applicable
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security
Holders
|
No
matter was submitted to a vote of the Company's shareholders during the
quarter ended September 30,
2008.
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
Not
applicable
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
Exhibit
(3)(i)
|
Articles
of Incorporation of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.,
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (3)(i) to the Form 8-A filed with the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on September 2, 1999
|
||
Exhibit
(3)(ii)
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (3)(ii) to the Form 10-Q filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2007
|
||
Exhibit
(4)
|
Specimen
Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4) to the Form
8-
|
|
A
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2,
1999
|
27
Exhibit
(10)(a)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Tony W. Wolfe
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(a) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(b)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Joseph F. Beaman,
Jr.
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(b) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(c)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and William D. Cable,
Sr.
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(d) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(d)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Lance A. Sellers
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(e) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(e)
|
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus Stock Ownership and
Long
|
|
Term
Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(f) to the Form
10-K
|
||
filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(e)(i)
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus
Stock
|
|
Ownership
and Long Term Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to
Exhibit
|
||
(10)(e)(i)
to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on
|
||
March
15, 2007
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(f)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and A. Joseph Lampron
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(g) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(g)
|
Peoples
Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral Plan, incorporated by reference
to
|
|
Exhibit
(10)(h) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange
|
||
Commission
on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(h)
|
Rabbi
Trust for the Peoples Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral
Plan,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(i)
|
Description
of Service Recognition Program maintained by Peoples
Bank,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(j)
|
Capital
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 2006, by and
among
|
|
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc., PEBK Capital Trust II and Bear,
Sterns
|
||
Securities
Corp. incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(j) to the Form
10-Q
|
||
filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13,
2006
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(k)
|
Amended
and Restated Trust Agreement of PEBK Capital Trust II, dated as
of
|
|
June
28, 2006 incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(k) to the Form 10-Q
filed
|
||
with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13,
2006
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(l)
|
Guarantee
Agreement of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. dated as of
June
|
|
28,
2006 incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(l) to the Form 10-Q filed
with
|
||
the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13, 2006
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(m)
|
Indenture,
dated as of June 28, 2006, by and between Peoples Bancorp of
North
|
|
Carolina,
Inc. and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating
to
|
||
Junior
Subordinated Debt Securities Due September 15, 2036 incorporated
by
|
||
reference
to Exhibit (10)(m) to the Form 10-Q filed with Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on November 13,
2006
|
28
Exhibit
(14)
|
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (14) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 25,
2005
|
Exhibit
(31)(a)
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-
|
|
Oxley
Act of 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(31)(b)
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-
|
|
Oxley
Act of 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(32)
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section
|
|
906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.
|
||
November
10, 2008
|
/s/
Tony W. Wolfe
|
|
Date
|
Tony
W. Wolfe
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
November
10, 2008
|
/s/
A. Joseph Lampron
|
|
Date
|
A.
Joseph Lampron
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal
Financial and Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
30