PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC - Quarter Report: 2008 March (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
|
|||
Washington,
D.C. 20549
|
|||
FORM
10-Q
|
|||
[ X
] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||
For
the quarterly period ended: March 31,
2008
|
|||
OR
|
|||
[ ]
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
|
|||
OF
THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
|
|||
For
the transition period from __________ to __________
|
|||
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA,
INC.
|
|||
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
|
|||
North
Carolina
|
|||
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization)
|
|||
000-27205
|
56-2132396
|
||
(Commission
File No.)
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
||
518
West C Street, Newton, North Carolina
|
28658
|
||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
Code)
|
||
(828)
464-5620
|
|||
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
|
|||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to
such filing requirements for the past 90
days.
|
Yes
|
X
|
No
|
|||
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
Accelerate Filer
|
Accelerated
Filer
|
X
|
Non-Accelerated
Filer
|
Smaller
Reporting Company
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Exchange
Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
|
No
|
X
|
|||
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's classes of
common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
5,603,683 shares of common
stock, outstanding at April 30,
2008.
|
INDEX
|
||||
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
PAGE(S)
|
||
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at March 31, 2008 (Unaudited) and
|
||||
December
31, 2007
|
3
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings for the three months ended March
|
||||
31,
2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three months
|
||||
ended
March 31, 2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the three months ended March
|
||||
31,
2008 and 2007 (Unaudited)
|
6-7
|
|||
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
8-10
|
|||
Item
2.
|
Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition
|
|||
and
Results of Operations
|
11-20
|
|||
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
21
|
||
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
22
|
||
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
|||
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
23
|
||
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
23
|
||
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
23
|
||
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
23
|
||
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
23
|
||
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
23
|
||
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
23-25
|
||
Signatures
|
26
|
|||
Certifications
|
27-29
|
Statements
made in this Form 10-Q, other than those concerning historical information,
should be considered forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor
provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and the Private Securities
Litigation Act of 1995. These forward-looking statements involve
risks and uncertainties and are based on the beliefs and assumptions of
management and on the information available to management at the time that this
Form 10-Q was prepared. These statements can be identified by the use
of words like “expect,” “anticipate,” “estimate,” and “believe,”
variations of these words and other similar expressions. Readers
should not place undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a number of
important factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those in
the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause actual
results to differ materially include, but are not limited to, (1) competition in
the markets served by Peoples Bank, (2) changes in the interest rate
environment, (3) general national, regional or local economic conditions may be
less favorable than expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration
in credit quality and the possible impairment of collectibility of loans, (4)
legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in accounting standards,
(5) significant changes in the federal and state legal and regulatory
environments and tax laws, (6) the impact of changes in monetary and fiscal
policies, laws, rules and regulations and (7) other risks and factors identified
in the Company’s other filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission,
including but not limited to those described in Peoples Bancorp of North
Carolina, Inc.’s annual report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2007
2
PART
I.
|
FINANCIAL
INFORMATION
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
||||||||
March
31,
|
December
31,
|
|||||||
Assets
|
2008
|
2007
|
||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Cash
and due from banks
|
$ | 24,373,479 | 26,108,437 | |||||
Interest
bearing deposits
|
1,484,005 | 1,539,190 | ||||||
Federal
funds sold
|
2,228,000 | 2,152,000 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
28,085,484 | 29,799,627 | ||||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
120,149,516 | 120,968,358 | ||||||
Other
investments
|
6,254,847 | 6,433,947 | ||||||
Total
securities
|
126,404,363 | 127,402,305 | ||||||
Loans
|
727,224,725 | 722,276,948 | ||||||
Less
allowance for loan losses
|
(9,369,730 | ) | (9,103,058 | ) | ||||
Net
loans
|
717,854,995 | 713,173,890 | ||||||
Premises
and equipment, net
|
18,503,155 | 18,234,393 | ||||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
6,837,154 | 6,776,379 | ||||||
Accrued
interest receivable and other assets
|
13,445,333 | 11,875,202 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 911,130,484 | 907,261,796 | |||||
Liabilities
and Shareholders' Equity
|
||||||||
Deposits:
|
||||||||
Non-interest
bearing demand
|
$ | 115,107,603 | 112,071,090 | |||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings
|
202,040,157 | 196,959,895 | ||||||
Time,
$100,000 or more
|
212,474,001 | 203,499,504 | ||||||
Other
time
|
175,204,132 | 181,108,214 | ||||||
Total
deposits
|
704,825,893 | 693,638,703 | ||||||
Demand
notes payable to U.S. Treasury
|
542,457 | 1,600,000 | ||||||
Securities
sold under agreement to repurchase
|
24,575,282 | 27,583,263 | ||||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
80,000,000 | 87,500,000 | ||||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
20,619,000 | 20,619,000 | ||||||
Accrued
interest payable and other liabilities
|
7,294,236 | 6,219,248 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
837,856,868 | 837,160,214 | ||||||
Shareholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, no par value; authorized
|
||||||||
5,000,000
shares; no shares issued
|
||||||||
and
outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
stock, no par value; authorized
|
||||||||
20,000,000
shares; issued and
|
||||||||
outstanding
5,603,683 shares in 2008
|
||||||||
and
5,624,234 shares in 2007
|
48,343,707 | 48,651,895 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
20,657,502 | 19,741,876 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive income (loss)
|
4,272,407 | 1,707,811 | ||||||
Total
shareholders' equity
|
73,273,616 | 70,101,582 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and shareholders' equity
|
$ | 911,130,484 | 907,261,796 | |||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
3
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings
|
||||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Interest
income:
|
||||||||
Interest
and fees on loans
|
$ | 13,044,464 | 13,600,189 | |||||
Interest
on federal funds sold
|
18,179 | 125,495 | ||||||
Interest
on investment securities:
|
||||||||
U.S.
Government agencies
|
1,134,089 | 1,130,079 | ||||||
States
and political subdivisions
|
226,544 | 219,494 | ||||||
Other
|
129,423 | 124,969 | ||||||
Total
interest income
|
14,552,699 | 15,200,226 | ||||||
Interest
expense:
|
||||||||
NOW,
MMDA & savings deposits
|
924,392 | 912,443 | ||||||
Time
deposits
|
4,274,471 | 4,286,403 | ||||||
FHLB
borrowings
|
946,661 | 923,490 | ||||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
326,747 | 360,199 | ||||||
Other
|
207,632 | 124,278 | ||||||
Total
interest expense
|
6,679,903 | 6,606,813 | ||||||
Net
interest income
|
7,872,796 | 8,593,413 | ||||||
Provision
for loans losses
|
391,000 | 323,000 | ||||||
Net
interest income after provision for loan losses
|
7,481,796 | 8,270,413 | ||||||
Non-interest
income:
|
||||||||
Service
charges
|
1,146,843 | 912,568 | ||||||
Other
service charges and fees
|
628,778 | 487,547 | ||||||
Mortgage
banking income
|
179,057 | 111,841 | ||||||
Insurance
and brokerage commissions
|
106,741 | 100,657 | ||||||
Miscellaneous
|
545,101 | 509,271 | ||||||
Total
non-interest income
|
2,606,520 | 2,121,884 | ||||||
Non-interest
expense:
|
||||||||
Salaries
and employee benefits
|
3,714,535 | 3,373,166 | ||||||
Occupancy
|
1,242,474 | 1,104,239 | ||||||
Other
|
1,973,356 | 1,543,641 | ||||||
Total
non-interest expense
|
6,930,365 | 6,021,046 | ||||||
Earnings
before income taxes
|
3,157,951 | 4,371,251 | ||||||
Income
taxes
|
1,103,500 | 1,584,126 | ||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 2,054,451 | 2,787,125 | |||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.37 | 0.49 | |||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 0.36 | 0.48 | |||||
Cash
dividends declared per share
|
$ | 0.12 | 0.08 | |||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
4
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income
|
||||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 2,054,451 | 2,787,125 | |||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss):
|
||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on securities
|
||||||||
available
for sale
|
1,811,688 | (108,395 | ) | |||||
Unrealized
holding gains on derivative
|
||||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
||||||||
hedges
|
2,347,160 | 123,011 | ||||||
Total
other comprehensive income,
|
||||||||
before
income taxes
|
4,158,848 | 14,616 | ||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit) related to other
|
||||||||
comprehensive
income:
|
||||||||
Unrealized
holding gains (losses) on securities
|
||||||||
available
for sale
|
705,653 | (42,220 | ) | |||||
Unrealized
holding gains on derivative
|
||||||||
financial
instruments qualifying as cash flow
|
||||||||
hedges
|
888,599 | 8,569 | ||||||
Total
income tax expense (benefit) related to
|
||||||||
other
comprehensive income
|
1,594,252 | (33,651 | ) | |||||
Total
other comprehensive income,
|
||||||||
net
of tax
|
2,564,596 | 48,267 | ||||||
Total
comprehensive income
|
$ | 4,619,047 | 2,835,392 | |||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
5
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
|
||||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
earnings
|
$ | 2,054,451 | 2,787,125 | |||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net earnings to
|
||||||||
net
cash provided by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Depreciation,
amortization and accretion
|
418,186 | 367,159 | ||||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
391,000 | 323,000 | ||||||
Loss
on sale of premises and equipment
|
471 | - | ||||||
Amortization
of deferred gain on sale of premises
|
- | (5,224 | ) | |||||
Loss
(gain) on sale of repossessed assets
|
(19,523 | ) | 62,178 | |||||
Stock
compensation expense
|
4,576 | 1,209 | ||||||
Split-dollar
life insurance expense
|
16,849 | - | ||||||
Change
in:
|
||||||||
Cash
surrender value of life insurance
|
(60,775 | ) | (56,800 | ) | ||||
Other
assets
|
(935,520 | ) | (14,228 | ) | ||||
Other
liabilities
|
591,222 | 822,647 | ||||||
Net
cash provided by operating activities
|
2,460,937 | 4,287,066 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities:
|
||||||||
Purchases
of investment securities available for sale
|
(722,029 | ) | (2,655,477 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from calls and maturities of investment securities available for
sale
|
3,375,897 | 1,410,681 | ||||||
Purchases
of other investments
|
(1,287,900 | ) | (864,400 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of other investments
|
1,467,000 | 1,404,000 | ||||||
Net
change in loans
|
(5,241,420 | ) | 6,259,122 | |||||
Purchases
of premises and equipment
|
(712,301 | ) | (1,444,596 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale of premises and equipment
|
1,545 | - | ||||||
Proceeds
from sale of repossessed assets
|
307,134 | 266,703 | ||||||
Net
cash used by investing activities
|
(2,812,074 | ) | 4,376,033 | |||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Net
change in deposits
|
11,187,190 | 25,359,165 | ||||||
Net
change in demand notes payable to U.S. Treasury
|
(1,057,543 | ) | (746,585 | ) | ||||
Net
change in securities sold under agreement to repurchase
|
(3,007,981 | ) | 2,819,686 | |||||
Proceeds
from FHLB borrowings
|
33,400,000 | 34,400,000 | ||||||
Repayments
of FHLB borrowings
|
(40,900,000 | ) | (46,700,000 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from exercise of stock options
|
37,236 | 70,455 | ||||||
Common
stock repurchased
|
(350,000 | ) | - | |||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(671,908 | ) | (460,101 | ) | ||||
Net
cash provided by financing activities
|
(1,363,006 | ) | 14,742,620 | |||||
Net
change in cash and cash equivalent
|
(1,714,143 | ) | 23,405,719 | |||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of period
|
29,799,627 | 21,500,318 | ||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ | 28,085,484 | 44,906,037 | |||||
6
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows, continued
|
||||||||
Three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007
|
||||||||
2008
|
2007
|
|||||||
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|||||||
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the year for:
|
||||||||
Interest
|
$ | 6,782,594 | 6,424,846 | |||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 85,000 | - | |||||
Noncash
investing and financing activities:
|
||||||||
Change
in unrealized gain on investment securities
|
||||||||
available
for sale, net of tax
|
$ | 1,106,035 | 66,175 | |||||
Change
in unrealized gain (loss) on derivative financial
|
||||||||
instruments,
net of tax
|
$ | 1,458,561 | (114,442 | ) | ||||
Transfer
of loans to other real estate and repossessions
|
$ | 169,315 | 123,702 | |||||
Reclassification
of an investment from other assets
|
||||||||
to
securities available for sale
|
$ | - | 499,995 | |||||
EITF
06-4 retained earnings reduction
|
$ | 466,917 | - | |||||
See
accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
7
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(1)
|
Summary
of Significant Accounting
Policies
|
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples Bank
(the “Bank”), along with the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples
Investment Services, Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively
called the “Company”). All significant intercompany balances and
transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
consolidated financial statements in this report are unaudited. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (none of which were other than normal
accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of the financial position and
results of operations for the periods presented have been
included. Management of the Company has made a number of estimates
and assumptions relating to reporting of assets and liabilities and the
disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities to prepare these consolidated
financial statements in conformity with generally accepted accounting
principles. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial
condition. Many of the Company’s accounting policies require
significant judgment regarding valuation of assets and liabilities and/or
significant interpretation of the specific accounting guidance. A
description of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be found in
Note 1 of the notes to consolidated financial statements in the Company’s 2007
Annual Report to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the
May 1, 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Recently
Adopted Accounting Pronouncements
In
September 2006, the Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) ratified the
conclusions reached by the Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) on EITF 06-4,
“Accounting for Deferred Compensation and Postretirement Benefit Aspects of
Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance Arrangements.” This issue
will require companies to recognize an obligation for either the present value
of the entire promised death benefit or the annual “cost of insurance” required
to keep the policy in force during the post-retirement years. EITF
06-4 was effective for the Company as of January 1, 2008. During
first quarter 2008, the Company made a $467,000 reduction to retained earnings
for the cumulative effect of EITF 06-4 as of January 1, 2008 pursuant to the
guidance of this pronouncement to record the portion of this benefit earned by
participants prior to adoption of this pronouncement. The Company
recognized $17,000 in expense associated with EITF 06-4 for the quarter ended
March 31, 2008.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS
157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 was effective for the Company as of January 1,
2008. This standard had no effect on the Company's financial position
or results of operations.
SFAS 157
establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy for fair value
measurements. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that a company has the ability to access at the
measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included
within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or
liability. The Company’s fair value measurements for items measured
at fair value at March 31, 2008 included:
Fair
Value Measurements March 31, 2008
|
Level
1
Valuation
|
Level
2
Valuation
|
Level
3
Valuation
|
||||||||||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
$ | 120,149,516 | 1,497,137 | 118,402,379 | 250,000 | ||||||||||
Market
value of derivatives (in other assets)
|
$ | 4,188,189 | - | 4,188,189 | - |
Fair
values of investment securities available for sale are determined by obtaining
quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges when
available. If quoted prices are not available, fair value is
determined using matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely
in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted
prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Fair values of
derivative instruments are determined using widely accepted
8
valuation
techniques including discounted cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of
each derivative. This analysis reflects the contractual terms of the
derivatives, including the period to maturity, and uses observable market-based
inputs, including interest rate curves and implied
volatilities.
The
following is an analysis of fair value measurements of investment securities
available for sale using Level 3, significant unobservable inputs, for the three
months ended March 31, 2008:
Investment
Securities Available for Sale
|
|||
Level
3 Valuation
|
|||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 250,000 | |
Change
in book value
|
- | ||
Change
in gain/(loss) realized and unrealized
|
- | ||
Purchases/(sales)
|
- | ||
Transfers
in and/or out of Level 3
|
- | ||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 250,000 | |
Change
in unrealized gain/(loss) for assets still held in Level 3
|
$ | 0 |
In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114, the Company has specific loan loss
reserves for loans that management has determined to be
impaired. These specific reserves are determined on an individual
loan basis based on management’s current evaluation of the Company’s loss
exposure for each credit, given the appraised value of any underlying
collateral. At March 31, 2008, the Company had specific reserves of
$1.2 million in the allowance for loan losses on loans totaling $10.0
million. The Company’s March 31, 2008 fair value measurement for
impaired loans is presented below:
Fair
Value Measurements March 31, 2008
|
Level
1
Valuation
|
Level
2
Valuation
|
Level
3
Valuation
|
Total
Gains/(Losses)
for
the three months ended
March 31, 2008
|
||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | 8,851,551 | - | - | 8,851,551 | - |
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS 159), which permits entities
to choose to measure financial instruments and certain other instruments at fair
value. SFAS 159 was effective for the Company as of January 1,
2008. The Company did not choose this option for any asset or
liability, and therefore SFAS 159 did not have any effect on the Company's
financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
Recently
Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is an
amendment to SFAS No. 133, which provides for enhanced disclosures about how and
why an entity uses derivatives and how and where those derivatives and related
hedged items are reported in the entity’s financial statements. SFAS
161 is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009. This standard
is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial position or
results of operations, and will likely result in additional disclosures related
to the Company’s derivatives.
(2)
|
Allowance
for Loan Losses
|
The
following is an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 and 2007:
2008 | 2007 | |||||||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 9,103,058 | 8,303,432 | |||||
Provision
for loan losses
|
391,000 | 323,000 | ||||||
Less:
|
||||||||
Charge-offs
|
(191,440 | ) | (131,138 | ) | ||||
Recoveries
|
67,112 | 124,780 | ||||||
Net
charge-offs
|
(124,328 | ) | (6,358 | ) | ||||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 9,369,730 | 8,620,074 |
9
(3)
|
Net
Earnings Per Share
|
Net
earnings per common share is based on the weighted average number of common
shares outstanding during the period while the effects of potential common
shares outstanding during the period are included in diluted earnings per
share. The average market price during the year is used to compute
equivalent shares.
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both “basic earnings
per share” and “diluted earnings per share” for the three months ended March 31,
2008 and March 31, 2007 is as follows:
For the three months
ended March 31, 2008
|
|||||||||||
Net Earnings | Common Shares |
Per Share
Amount
|
|||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 2,054,451 | 5,609,525 | $ | 0.37 | ||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||||
Stock
options
|
- | 76,280 | |||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 2,054,451 | 5,685,805 | $ | 0.36 |
For the three months
ended March 31, 2007
|
|||||||||||
Net Earnings | Common Share |
Per
Share
Amount
|
|||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | 2,787,125 | 5,748,087 | $ | 0.49 | ||||||
Effect
of dilutive securities:
|
|||||||||||
Stock
options
|
- | 118,926 | |||||||||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | 2,787,125 | 5,867,013 | $ | 0.48 |
(4)
|
Stock-Based
Compensation
|
The
Company has an Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan (the “Plan”)
whereby certain stock-based rights, such as stock options, restricted stock,
performance units, stock appreciation rights, or book value shares, may be
granted to eligible directors and employees. A total of 636,637
shares are currently reserved for possible issuance under this
Plan. All rights must be granted or awarded within ten years
from the May 13, 1999 effective date of the Plan.
Under the
Plan, the Company granted incentive stock options to certain eligible employees
in order that they may purchase Company stock at a price equal to the fair
market value on the date of the grant. The options granted in 1999
vest over a five-year period. Options granted subsequent to 1999 vest
over a three-year period. All options expire ten years after
issuance. The Company did not grant any options during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007.
The
Company granted 3,000 shares of restricted stock in 2007 at a fair value of
$17.40 per share. The Company granted 1,750 shares of restricted stock during
the three months ended March 31, 2008 at a fair value of $12.80 per share. As of
March 31, 2008, there was $65,000 of total unrecognized compensation cost
related to restricted stock grants, which is expected to be recognized over a
period of three years.
10
Item
2. Management's
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
The
following is a discussion of our financial position and results of operations
and should be read in conjunction with the information set forth under Item 1A
Risk Factors and the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes
thereto on pages A-27 through A-56 of the Company’s 2007 Annual
Report to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the May 1,
2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Introduction
Management's
discussion and analysis of earnings and related data are presented to assist in
understanding the consolidated financial condition and results of operations of
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Peoples Bancorp is the parent company of
Peoples Bank (the “Bank”) and a registered bank holding company operating under
the supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the
“Federal Reserve”). The Bank is a North Carolina-chartered bank, with offices in
Catawba, Lincoln, Alexander, Mecklenburg, Iredell, Union and Wake counties,
operating under the banking laws of North Carolina and the rules and regulations
of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”).
Overview
Our
business consists principally of attracting deposits from the general public and
investing these funds in loans secured by commercial real estate, secured and
unsecured commercial and consumer loans. Our profitability depends primarily on
our net interest income, which is the difference between the income we receive
on our loan and investment securities portfolios and our cost of funds, which
consists of interest paid on deposits and borrowed funds. Net interest income
also is affected by the relative amounts of interest-earning assets and
interest-bearing liabilities. When interest-earning assets approximate or exceed
interest-bearing liabilities, any positive interest rate spread will generate
net interest income. Our profitability is also affected by the level of other
income and operating expenses. Other income consists primarily of miscellaneous
fees related to our loans and deposits, mortgage banking income and commissions
from sales of annuities and mutual funds. Operating expenses consist of
compensation and benefits, occupancy related expenses, federal deposit and other
insurance premiums, data processing, advertising and other
expenses.
Our
operations are influenced significantly by local economic conditions and by
policies of financial institution regulatory authorities. The earnings on our
assets are influenced by the effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and
fiscal policies and laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal
Reserve, inflation, interest rates, market and monetary
fluctuations. Lending activities are affected by the demand for
commercial and other types of loans, which in turn is affected by the interest
rates at which such financing may be offered. Our cost of funds is
influenced by interest rates on competing investments and by rates offered on
similar investments by competing financial institutions in our market area, as
well as general market interest rates. These factors can cause fluctuations in
our net interest income and other income. In addition, local economic conditions
can impact the credit risk of our loan portfolio, in that (1) local employers
may be required to eliminate employment positions of individual borrowers and
small businesses and (2) commercial borrowers may experience a downturn in their
operating performance and become unable to make timely payments on their loans.
Management evaluates these factors in estimating its allowance for loan losses,
and changes in these economic conditions could result in increases or decreases
to the provision for loan losses.
Our
business emphasis has been to operate as a well-capitalized, profitable and
independent community-oriented financial institution dedicated to providing
quality customer service. We are committed to meeting the financial needs of the
communities in which we operate. We believe that we can be more effective in
servicing our customers than many of our non-local competitors because of our
ability to quickly and effectively provide senior management responses to
customer needs and inquiries. Our ability to provide these services is enhanced
by the stability of our senior management team.
The
Company qualified as an accelerated filer in accordance with Rule 12b-2 of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, effective December 31,
2006. Therefore, the Company is subject to the requirements of
Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX 404”). The
Company incurred additional consulting and audit expenses in becoming compliant
with SOX 404, and will continue to incur additional audit expenses to comply
with SOX 404 going forward. Management does not expect expenses
related to SOX 404 to have a material impact on the Company’s financial
statements.
The Bank
opened a new office in Mecklenburg County, in Cornelius, North Carolina in June
2007and a new office in Iredell County, in Mooresville, North Carolina in
January 2008. Also in January 2008, the Bank opened a new Banco de la
Gente office in Wake County, in Raleigh, North Carolina in a continuing effort
to serve the Latino community. While there are no additional
traditional offices planned in 2008, management will consider opening at least
one new traditional office in Mecklenburg or Iredell counties in the next two to
three years and additional Banco de la Gente offices in metropolitan areas in
North Carolina.
11
Summary
of Significant Accounting Policies
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements of Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned subsidiary, Peoples Bank,
along with the Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples Investment Services,
Inc. and Real Estate Advisory Services, Inc. (collectively called the
“Company”). All significant intercompany balances and transactions
have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to understanding management’s
discussion and analysis of results of operations and financial
condition. Many of the Company’s accounting policies require
significant judgment regarding valuation of assets and liabilities and/or
significant interpretation of specific accounting guidance. A more
complete description of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be
found in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Company’s 2007 Annual Report to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy
Statement for the May 1, 2008 Annual Meeting of Shareholders. The
following is a summary of the more subjective and complex accounting policies of
the Company.
Many of
the Company’s assets and liabilities are recorded using various techniques that
require significant judgment as to recoverability. The collectability
of loans is reflected through the Company’s estimate of the allowance for loan
losses. The Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews
of its lending portfolio to assess overall collectability. In
addition, certain assets and liabilities are reflected at their estimated fair
value in the consolidated financial statements. Such amounts are
based on either quoted market prices or estimated values derived from dealer
quotes used by the Company, market comparisons or internally generated modeling
techniques. The Company’s internal models generally involve present
value of cash flow techniques. The various techniques are discussed
in greater detail elsewhere in management’s discussion and analysis and the
notes to the consolidated financial statements.
There are
other complex accounting standards that require the Company to employ
significant judgment in interpreting and applying certain of the principles
prescribed by those standards. These judgments include, but are not
limited to, the determination of whether a financial instrument or other
contract meets the definition of a derivative in accordance with Statement of
Financial Accounting Standards No. 133, “Accounting for Derivative Instruments
and Hedging Activities.” For a more complete discussion of policies,
see the notes to the consolidated financial statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB ratified the conclusions reached by the Emerging Issues
Task Force (EITF) on EITF 06-4, “Accounting for Deferred Compensation and
Postretirement Benefit Aspects of Endorsement Split-Dollar Life Insurance
Arrangements.” This issue will require companies to recognize an
obligation for either the present value of the entire promised death benefit or
the annual “cost of insurance” required to keep the policy in force during the
post-retirement years. EITF 06-4 was effective for the Company as of
January 1, 2008. During first quarter 2008, the Company made a
$467,000 reduction to retained earnings for the cumulative effect of EITF 06-4
as of January 1, 2008 pursuant to the guidance of this pronouncement to record
the portion of this benefit earned by participants prior to adoption of this
pronouncement. The recognized $17,000 in expense associated with EITF
06-4 for the quarter ended March 31, 2008.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 157, “Fair Value Measurements” (SFAS
157). SFAS 157 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring
fair value in generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP), and expands
disclosures about fair value measurements. SFAS 157 applies under other
accounting pronouncements that require or permit fair value measurements.
SFAS 157 was effective for the Company as of January 1,
2008. This standard had no effect on the Company's financial position
or results of operations.
SFAS 157
establishes a three-level fair value hierarchy for fair value
measurements. Level 1 inputs are quoted prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities that a company has the ability to access at the
measurement date. Level 2 inputs are inputs other than quoted prices included
within Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly
or indirectly. Level 3 inputs are unobservable inputs for the asset or
liability. The Company’s fair value measurements for items measured at fair
value at March 31, 2008 included:
Fair
Value Measurements March 31, 2008
|
Level
1
Valuation
|
Level
2
Valuation
|
Level
3
Valuation
|
|||||||||
Investment
securities available for sale
|
$ | 120,149,516 | 1,497,137 | 118,402,379 | 250,000 | |||||||
Market
value of derivatives (in other assets)
|
$ | 4,188,189 | - | 4,188,189 | - |
Fair
values of investment securities available for sale are determined by obtaining
quoted prices on nationally recognized securities exchanges when
available. If quoted prices are not available, fair value is
determined using matrix pricing, which is a mathematical technique used widely
in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on quoted
prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities’
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Fair values of
derivative instruments are determined using widely accepted valuation techniques
including
12
discounted
cash flow analysis on the expected cash flows of each derivative. This analysis
reflects the contractual terms of the derivatives, including the period to
maturity, and uses observable market-based inputs, including interest rate
curves and implied volatilities.
The
following is an analysis of fair value measurements of investment securities
available for sale using Level 3, significant unobservable inputs, for the three
months ended March 31, 2008:
Investment
Securities Available for Sale
|
|||
Level
3 Valuation
|
|||
Balance,
beginning of period
|
$ | 250,000 | |
Change
in book value
|
- | ||
Change
in gain/(loss) realized and unrealized
|
- | ||
Purchases/(sales)
|
- | ||
Transfers
in and/or out of Level 3
|
- | ||
Balance,
end of period
|
$ | 250,000 | |
Change
in unrealized gain/(loss) for assets still held in Level 3
|
$ | 0 |
In
accordance with the provisions of SFAS 114, the Company has specific loan loss
reserves for loans that management has determined to be
impaired. These specific reserves are determined on an individual
loan basis based on management’s current evaluation of the Company’s loss
exposure for each credit, given the appraised value of any underlying
collateral. At March 31, 2008, the Company had specific reserves of
$1.2 million in the allowance for loan losses on loans totaling $10.0
million. The Company’s March 31, 2008 fair value measurement for
impaired loans is presented below:
Fair
Value Measurements March 31, 2008
|
Level
1
Valuation
|
Level
2
Valuation
|
Level
3
Valuation
|
Total
Gains/ (Losses) for
the three months ended
March 31, 2008
|
||||||
Impaired
loans
|
$ | 8,851,551 | - | - | 8,851,551 | - |
In
February 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, “The Fair Value Option for
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities” (SFAS 159), which permits entities
to choose to measure financial instruments and certain other instruments at fair
value. SFAS 159 was effective for the Company as of January 1,
2008. The Company did not choose this option for any asset or
liability, and therefore SFAS 159 did not have any effect on the Company's
financial position, results of operations or disclosures.
In March
2008, the FASB issued SFAS No. 161, “Disclosures about Derivative
Instruments and Hedging Activities,” (SFAS 161). SFAS 161 is an
amendment to SFAS No. 133, which provides for enhanced disclosures about how and
why an entity uses derivatives and how and where those derivatives and related
hedged items are reported in the entity’s financial statements. SFAS
161 is effective for the Company as of January 1, 2009. This standard
is not expected to have a material effect on the Company's financial position or
results of operations, and will likely result in additional disclosures related
to the Company’s derivatives.
Management
of the Company has made a number of estimates and assumptions relating to
reporting of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in conformity
with GAAP. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Results
of Operations
Summary. Net
earnings for the first quarter of 2008 were $2.1 million, or $0.37 basic net
earnings per share and $0.36 diluted net earnings per share as compared to $2.8
million, or $0.49 basic net earnings per share and $0.48 diluted net earnings
per share for the same period one year ago. The decrease in net
earnings is attributable to a decrease in net interest income, an increase in
provision for loan losses and an in increase in non-interest expense, which were
partially offset by an increase in non-interest income.
The
annualized return on average assets was 0.92% for the three months ended March
31, 2008 compared to 1.37% for the same period in 2007, and annualized return on
average shareholders' equity was 11.26% for the three months ended March 31,
2008 compared to 17.31% for the same period in 2007.
13
Net Interest
Income. Net interest income, the major component of the
Company's net earnings, was $7.9 million for the three months ended March 31,
2008, a decrease of 8% from the $8.6 million earned in the same period in 2007.
This decrease is primarily attributable to a 300 basis point reduction in the
Bank’s prime commercial lending rate from March 31, 2007 to March 31,
2008.
Interest
income decreased $648,000 or 4% for the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared with the same period in 2007. The decrease was due to a 300
basis point reduction in the Bank’s prime commercial lending rate, which was
partially offset by an increase in the average outstanding balance of loans and
income from interest rate floor contracts. The average yield on
earning assets for the quarters ended March 31, 2008 and 2007 was 6.99% and
8.00%, respectively. During the quarter ended March 31, 2008, average
loans increased $77.5 million to $720.6 million from $643.1 million for the
three months ended March 31, 2007. During the quarter ended March 31,
2008, average investment securities available-for-sale decreased $1.5 million to
$118.3 million from $119.8 million for the three months ended March 31,
2007.
Interest
expense increased $73,000 or 1% for the three months ended March 31, 2008
compared with the same period in 2007. The average rate paid on
interest-bearing checking and savings accounts was 1.91% for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 as compared to 2.09% for the same period of
2007. The average rate paid on certificates of deposits was 4.42% for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 compared to 4.78% for the same period one
year ago.
Provision for Loan
Losses. For the three months ended March 31, 2008, a
contribution of $391,000 was made to the provision for loan losses compared to
$323,000 for the same period one year ago. The increase in provision
for loan losses is primarily attributable to an increase in net charge-offs of
$118,000.
Non-Interest
Income. Total non-interest income was $2.6 million in the
first quarter of 2008 as compared to $2.1 million for the same period of
2007. Increases in components of non-interest income for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 compared to the same period last year were primarily
attributable to increases in service charges and fees, mortgage banking income
and miscellaneous income. Service charges were $1.1 million and $913,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 and 2007, respectively. Other
service charges and fees increased 29% to $629,000 for the three-month period
ended March 31, 2008 when compared to the same period one year
ago. The increase in service charges and fees is primarily
attributable to growth in the Bank’s deposit base coupled with normal pricing
changes. Mortgage banking income increased $67,000 during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the corresponding period in 2007 as a
result of increased brokered loan activity. Insurance and brokerage
commissions increased 6% for the three months ended March 31, 2008 when compared
to same period last year. Miscellaneous income was $545,000 for the
three months ended March 31, 2008, a 7% increase from $509,000 for the same
period in 2007. This increase in miscellaneous income is primarily
due to an increase in debit card fee income associated with increased card usage
due to an increase in the number of demand accounts.
Non-Interest
Expense. Total non-interest expense increased 15% to $6.9
million for the first quarter of 2008 as compared to $6.0 million for the
corresponding period in 2007. Salary and employee benefits totaled
$3.7 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008, an increase of 10% from
the same period in 2007. The increase in salary and employee benefits
is due to normal salary increases and expense associated with additional staff
for new branches. Occupancy expense increased 13% for the quarter
ended March 31, 2008 due to an increase in furniture and equipment expense and
lease expense associated with new offices. Other non-interest expense
increased 28% to $2.0 million for the three months ended March 31, 2008 as
compared to the same period in 2007. This increase in other
non-interest expense is attributable to an increase of $97,000 in advertising
expense, an increase of $109,000 in FDIC insurance expense and an increase of
$70,000 in deposit program expense.
Income Taxes. The
Company reported income taxes of $1.1 million and $1.6 million for the first
quarters of 2008 and 2007, respectively. This represented effective
tax rates of 35% and 36% for the respective periods.
Analysis
of Financial Condition
Investment
Securities. Available-for-sale securities amounted to $120.1
million at March 31, 2008 compared to $121.0 million at December 31,
2007. Average investment securities available for sale for the three
months ended March 31, 2008 amounted to $118.3 million compared to $120.3
million for the year ended December 31, 2007.
Loans. At March
31, 2008, loans amounted to $727.2 million compared to $722.3 million at
December 31, 2007, an increase of $4.9 million. Average loans
represented 85% and 83% of total earning assets for the three months ended March
31, 2008 and the year ended December 31, 2007, respectively.
Allowance for Loan
Losses. The allowance for loan losses reflects management's
assessment and estimate of the risks associated with extending credit and its
evaluation of the quality of the loan portfolio. The Bank
periodically analyzes
14
the loan
portfolio in an effort to review asset quality and to establish an allowance for
loan losses that management believes will be adequate in light of anticipated
risks and loan losses. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance,
size, quality and risk of loans in the portfolio are reviewed. Other factors
considered are:
·
|
the
Bank’s loan loss experience;
|
·
|
the
amount of past due and non-performing
loans;
|
·
|
specific
known risks;
|
·
|
the
status and amount of other past due and non-performing
assets;
|
·
|
underlying
estimated values of collateral securing
loans;
|
·
|
current
and anticipated economic conditions;
and
|
·
|
other
factors which management believes affect the allowance for potential
credit losses.
|
Management
uses several measures to assess and monitor the credit risks in the loan
portfolio, including a loan grading system that begins upon loan origination and
continues until the loan is collected or collectibility becomes doubtful. Upon
loan origination, the Bank’s originating loan officer evaluates the quality of
the loan and assigns one of nine risk grades, each grade indicating a different
level of loss reserves. The loan officer monitors the loan’s performance and
credit quality and makes changes to the credit grade as conditions warrant. When
originated or renewed, all loans over a certain dollar amount receive in-depth
reviews and risk assessments by the Bank’s Credit Administration. Before making
any changes in these risk grades, management considers assessments as determined
by the third party credit review firm (as described below), regulatory examiners
and the Bank’s Credit Administration. Any issues regarding the risk assessments
are addressed by the Bank’s senior credit administrators and factored into
management’s decision to originate or renew the loan. The Bank’s Board of
Directors reviews, on a monthly basis, an analysis of the Bank’s reserves
relative to the range of reserves estimated by the Bank’s Credit
Administration.
As an
additional measure, the Bank engages an independent third party to review the
underwriting, documentation and risk grading analyses. This independent third
party reviews and evaluates all loan relationships greater than $1.0
million. The third party’s evaluation and report is shared with
management and the Bank’s Board of Directors.
Management
considers certain commercial loans with weak credit risk grades to be
individually impaired and measures such impairment based upon available cash
flows and the value of the collateral. Allowance or reserve levels are estimated
for all other graded loans in the portfolio based on their assigned credit risk
grade, type of loan and other matters related to credit risk.
Management
uses the information developed from the procedures described above in evaluating
and grading the loan portfolio. This continual grading process is used to
monitor the credit quality of the loan portfolio and to assist management in
estimating the allowance for loan losses.
The
allowance for loan losses is comprised of three components: specific reserves,
general reserves and unallocated reserves. After a loan has been
identified as impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with SFAS
No. 114, “Accounting By Creditors for Impairment of a Loan.” When the measure of the
impaired loan is less than the recorded investment in the loan, the amount of
the impairment is recorded as a specific reserve. These specific reserves are
determined on an individual loan basis based on management’s current evaluation
of the Company’s loss exposure for each credit, given the appraised value of any
underlying collateral. Loans for which specific reserves are provided are
excluded from the general allowance calculations as described
below. At March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, the recorded
investment in loans that were considered to be impaired under SFAS No. 114 was
approximately $10.0 million and $8.0 million, respectively, with related
allowance for loan losses of approximately $1.2 million at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
The
general allowance reflects reserves established under the provisions of SFAS No.
5, “Accounting for Contingencies” for collective loan
impairment. These reserves are based upon historical net charge-offs
using the last three years’
experience. This charge-off experience may be adjusted to reflect the
effects of current conditions. The Bank considers information derived
from its loan risk ratings and external data related to industry and general
economic trends.
The
unallocated allowance is determined through management’s assessment of probable
losses that are in the portfolio but are not adequately captured by the other
two components of the allowance, including consideration of current economic and
business conditions and regulatory requirements. The unallocated allowance also
reflects management’s acknowledgement of the imprecision and subjectivity that
underlie the modeling of credit risk. Due to the subjectivity
involved in determining the overall allowance, including the unallocated
portion, this unallocated portion may fluctuate from period to period based on
management’s evaluation of the factors affecting the assumptions used in
calculating the allowance.
15
Management
considers the allowance for loan losses adequate to cover the estimated losses
inherent in the Company’s loan portfolio as of the date of the financial
statements. Management believes it has established the allowance in accordance
with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America
and in consideration of the current economic environment. Although management
uses the best information available to make evaluations, significant future
additions to the allowance may be necessary based on changes in economic and
other conditions, thus adversely affecting the operating results of the
Company.
There
were no significant changes in the estimation methods or fundamental assumptions
used in the evaluation of the allowance for loan losses for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2007. Such
revisions, estimates and assumptions are made in any period in which the
supporting factors indicate that loss levels may vary from the previous
estimates.
Additionally,
various regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process,
periodically review the Bank’s allowances for loan losses. Such agencies may
require adjustments to the allowances based on their judgments of information
available to them at the time of their examinations.
The allowance for loan losses at March
31, 2008 amounted to $9.4 million or 1.29% of total loans compared to $9.1
million or 1.26% of total loans at December 31, 2007.
The
following table presents the percentage of loans assigned to each risk grade at
March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007.
LOAN
RISK GRADE ANALYSIS:
|
|||||
Percentage
of Loans
|
|||||
By
Risk Grade*
|
|||||
Risk
Grade
|
03/31/2008
|
12/31/2007
|
|||
Risk
1 (Excellent Quality)
|
10.59%
|
11.06%
|
|||
Risk
2 (High Quality)
|
13.87%
|
14.06%
|
|||
Risk
3 (Good Quality)
|
63.49%
|
62.53%
|
|||
Risk
4 (Management Attention)
|
8.75%
|
9.51%
|
|||
Risk
5 (Watch)
|
1.57%
|
1.57%
|
|||
Risk
6 (Substandard)
|
0.13%
|
0.13%
|
|||
Risk
7 (Low Substandard)
|
0.03%
|
0.03%
|
|||
Risk
8 (Doubtful)
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
|||
Risk
9 (Loss)
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
|||
*
Excludes non-accrual loans
|
At March
31, 2008 there were two relationships exceeding $1.0 million (which totaled $7.1
million) in the Watch risk grade, no relationships exceeding $1.0 million in the
Substandard risk grade and no relationships exceeding $1.0 million in the Low
Substandard risk grade. These customers continue to meet payment requirements
and these relationships would not become non-performing assets unless they are
unable to meet those requirements.
Non-performing
Assets. Non-performing assets totaled $12.1 million at March
31, 2008 or 1.33% of total assets, compared to $8.5 million at December 31,
2007, or 0.93% of total assets. Non-accrual loans were $11.4 million
at March 31, 2008 and $8.0 million at December 31, 2007. As a
percentage of total loans outstanding, non-accrual loans were 1.57% at March 31,
2008 compared to 1.11% at December 31, 2007. The increase in
non-accrual loans is primarily due to one relationship of $1.8 million with
local residential builder and rental property loan of approximately
$854,000. The Bank had loans 90 days past due and still accruing at
March 31, 2008 of $347,000. At December 31, 2007, the Bank had no
loans 90 days past due and still accruing. Other real estate owned
totaled $365,000 as of March 31, 2008 as compared to $483,000 at December 31,
2007. The Bank had no repossessed assets as of March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007.
Total
non-performing loans, which include non-accrual loans and loans 90 days past due
and still accruing, were $11.8 million and $8.0 million at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. The ratio of non-performing loans to
total loans was 1.62% at March 31, 2008, as compared to 1.11% at December 31,
2007.
Deposits. Total
deposits at March 31, 2008 were $704.8 million, an increase of $11.2 million
over deposits of $693.6 million at December 31, 2007. Core deposits, which
include non-interest bearing demand deposits, NOW, MMDA, savings and
certificates of deposits of denominations less than $100,000, increased $2.3
million to $492.4 million at March 31, 2008 as compared to $490.1 million at
December 31, 2007. The Bank introduced remote deposit capture for
customers in 2007 which has enabled the Bank to gather additional deposits from
several existing customers and has been helpful in attracting new
customers. Certificates of deposit in amounts greater than $100,000
or more totaled $212.5 million at March 31, 2008 as compared to $203.5 million
at December 31, 2007. At March 31, 2008, brokered deposits amounted
to $47.0
16
million
as compared to $53.9 million at December 31, 2007. The decrease in
brokered deposits reflects maturing brokered certificates of deposit that were
not replaced due to an increase in retail deposits. Brokered deposits
outstanding as of March 31, 2008 had a weighted average rate of 4.41% with a
weighted average original term of 7 months.
Borrowed Funds. Borrowings
from the FHLB
totaled $80.0 million at March 31, 2008 compared to $87.5 million at December
31, 2007. The average balance of FHLB borrowings for the three months
ended March 31, 2008 was $81.6 million compared to $80.1 million for the year
ended December 31, 2007. At March 31, 2008, $77.0 million of the
Bank’s FHLB borrowings had maturities exceeding one year. The FHLB
has the option to convert $72.0 million of the total advances to a floating rate
and, if converted, the Bank may repay advances without a prepayment
fee. The Company also has an additional $5.0 million in variable rate
convertible advances, which may be repaid without a prepayment fee if converted
by the FHLB. The Company had no federal funds purchased as of March
31, 2008 or December 31, 2007.
Securities
sold under agreements to repurchase decreased $3.0 million to $24.6 million at
March 31, 2008 as compared to $27.6 million at December 31, 2007.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
(related to Trust Preferred Securities). In June 2006 the
Company formed a wholly owned Delaware statutory trust, PEBK Capital Trust II
(“PEBK Trust II”), which issued $20.0 million of guaranteed preferred beneficial
interests in the Company’s junior subordinated deferrable interest
debentures. All of the common securities of PEBK Trust II are owned
by the Company. The proceeds from the issuance of the common
securities and the trust preferred securities were used by PEBK Trust II to
purchase $20.6 million of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which
pay a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 163 basis
points. The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of the
junior subordinated debentures were used to repay in December 2006 the trust
preferred securities issued by PEBK Capital Trust I in December 2001 and for
general purposes. The debentures represent the sole asset of PEBK
Trust II. PEBK Trust II is not included in the consolidated financial
statements.
The trust
preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust II accrue and pay quarterly at a
floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 163 basis points. The Company
has guaranteed distributions and other payments due on the trust preferred
securities to the extent PEBK Trust II has funds with which to make the
distributions and other payments. The net combined effect of the
trust preferred securities transaction is that the Company is obligated to make
the distributions and other payments required on the trust preferred
securities.
These
trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity of the
debentures on June 28, 2036, or upon earlier redemption as provided in the
indenture. The Company has the right to redeem the debentures
purchased by PEBK Trust II, in whole or in part, on or after June 28,
2011. As specified in the indenture, if the debentures are redeemed
prior to maturity, the redemption price will be the principal amount and any
accrued but unpaid interest.
Asset Liability and Interest Rate
Risk Management. The objective of the Company’s Asset
Liability and Interest Rate Risk strategies is to identify and manage the
sensitivity of net interest income to changing interest rates and to minimize
the interest rate risk between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities at various maturities. This is to be done in conjunction
with the need to maintain adequate liquidity and the overall goal of maximizing
net interest income.
The
Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates through policies
established by the Asset/Liability Committee (“ALCO”) of the
Bank. The ALCO meets monthly and has the responsibility for approving
asset/liability management policies, formulating and implementing strategies to
improve balance sheet positioning and/or earnings and reviewing the interest
rate sensitivity of the Company. ALCO tries to minimize interest rate
risk between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities by
attempting to minimize wide fluctuations in net interest income due to interest
rate movements. The ability to control these fluctuations has a
direct impact on the profitability of the Company. Management monitors this
activity on a regular basis through analysis of its portfolios to determine the
difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive
liabilities.
The Company’s rate sensitive assets are
those earning interest at variable rates and those with contractual maturities
within one year. Rate sensitive assets therefore include both loans
and available-for-sale securities. Rate sensitive liabilities include
interest-bearing checking accounts, money market deposit accounts, savings
accounts, time deposits and borrowed funds. The Company’s balance
sheet is asset-sensitive, meaning that in a given period there will be more
assets than liabilities subject to immediate repricing as interest rates change
in the market. Because the majority of the Company’s loans are tied
to the prime rate, they reprice more rapidly than rate sensitive
interest-bearing deposits. During periods of rising rates, this
results in increased net interest income. The opposite occurs during
periods of declining rates. Average rate sensitive assets for the
three months ended March 31, 2008 totaled $849.8 million, exceeding average rate
sensitive liabilities of $714.1 million by $135.7 million.
17
In order
to assist in achieving a desired level of interest rate sensitivity, the Company
entered into off-balance sheet contracts that are considered derivative
financial instruments. As of March 31, 2008, the Company had cash
flow hedges with a notional amount of $185.0 million. These
derivative instruments consist of five interest rate floor contracts that are
used to hedge future cash flows from payments on the first $185.0 million of
certain variable rate loans against the downward effects of their repricing in
the event of a decreasing rate environment during the terms of the interest rate
floor contracts. If the prime rate falls below the contract rate
during the term of the contract, the Company will receive payments based on
notional amount times the difference between the contract rate and the weighted
average prime rate for the quarter. No payments will be received by
the Company if the weighted average prime rate is equal to or higher than the
contract rate. The Company recognized $406,000 in interest income,
net of premium amortization, from interest rate floor contracts during the first
three months of 2008. Based on the current interest rate environment,
it is expected the Company will continue to receive income on these interest
rate contracts throughout 2008. The following tables present
additional information on the Company’s derivative financial
instruments.
DERIVATIVE
INSTRUMENTS AS OF MARCH 31, 2008
|
|||||||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|||||||||||||||
Type
of Derivative
|
Notional
Amount
|
Contract
Rate
|
Premium
|
Year-to-date
Income
(Net
of Premium Amortization)
|
|||||||||||
Interest
rate floor contact
|
$ | 35,000 | 6.25% | $ | 161 | $ | 23 | ||||||||
Interest
rate floor contact
|
35,000 | 7.00% | 203 | 45 | |||||||||||
Interest
rate floor contact
|
45,000 | 7.50% | 562 | 115 | |||||||||||
Interest
rate floor contact
|
35,000 | 8.00% | 399 | 144 | |||||||||||
Interest
rate floor contact
|
35,000 | 7.25% | 634 | 79 | |||||||||||
$ | 185,000 | $ | 1,959 | $ | 406 |
FAIR
VALUES OF DERIVATIVES DESIGNATED AS HEDGING INSTRUMENTS UNDER SFAS
133
|
|||||||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|||||||||||
Asset
Derivatives
|
Liability
Derivatives
|
||||||||||
As of March 31, | As of December 31, | As of March 31, | As of December 31, | ||||||||
2008 | 2007 | 2008 | 2007 | ||||||||
Balance | Balance | Balance | Balance | ||||||||
Sheet | Fair | Sheet | Fair | Sheet | Fair | Sheet | Fair | ||||
Location | Value | Location | Value | Location | Value | Location | Value | ||||
Interest
rate floor contacts
|
Other
assets
|
$
4,188
|
Other
assets
|
$ 1,907
|
N/A
|
$ -
|
N/A
|
$ -
|
Included
in the rate sensitive assets are $463.8 million in variable rate loans indexed
to prime rate subject to immediate repricing upon changes by the
FOMC. The Bank utilizes interest rate floors on certain variable rate
loans to protect against further downward movements in the prime
rate. At March 31, 2008, the Bank had $78.9 million in loans with
interest rate floors. The floors were in effect on $47.6 million of
these loans pursuant to the terms of the promissory notes on these
loans. The weighted average rate on these loans is 1.29% higher
than the indexed rate on the promissory notes without interest rate
floors.
The Bank
also had $43,000 in loans that are tied to the prime rate that had 6.00%
interest rate caps in effect due to the Soldiers and Sailors’ Civil Relief
Act. The weighted average rate on these loans is 0.25% lower than the
indexed rate on the promissory notes without the interest rate
caps.
Liquidity. The objectives of
the Company’s liquidity policy are to provide for the availability of adequate
funds to meet the needs of loan demand, deposit withdrawals, maturing
liabilities and to satisfy regulatory requirements. Both deposit
and loan customer cash needs can fluctuate significantly depending upon business
cycles, economic conditions and yields and returns available from alternative
investment opportunities. In addition, the Company’s liquidity is
affected by off-balance sheet commitments to lend in the form of unfunded
commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. As of
March 31, 2008 such unfunded commitments to extend credit were $182.8 million,
while commitments in the form of standby letters of credit totaled $3.0
million.
The Company uses several sources to
meet its liquidity requirements. The primary source is core deposits,
which includes demand deposits, savings accounts and certificates of deposits of
denominations less than $100,000. The Company considers these to be a
stable portion of the Company’s liability mix and the result of on-going
consumer and commercial banking relationships. As of March 31, 2008,
the Company’s core deposits totaled $492.4 million, or 70% of total
deposits.
18
The other sources of funding for the
Company are through large denomination certificates of deposit, including
brokered deposits, federal funds purchased and FHLB advances. The
Bank is also able to borrow from the Federal Reserve Discount Window on a
short-term basis. As of March 31, 2008, the Bank had $11.1 million in
securities pledged to the Federal Reserve Discount Window with $10.3 million
borrowing availability.
At March
31, 2008, the Bank had a significant amount of deposits in amounts greater than
$100,000, including brokered deposits of $47.0 million, which mature over the
next seven months. The balance and cost of these deposits are more
susceptible to changes in the interest rate environment than other
deposits.
The Bank
had a line of credit with the FHLB equal to 20% of the Bank’s total assets, with
an outstanding balance of $80.0 million at March 31, 2008. The
remaining availability at FHLB was $68.2 million at March 31,
2008. The Bank also had the ability to borrow up to $35.0 million for
the purchase of overnight federal funds from three correspondent financial
institutions as of March 31, 2008.
The
liquidity ratio for the Bank, which is defined as net cash, interest bearing
deposits with banks, federal funds sold, certain investment securities and
certain FHLB advances available under the line of credit, as a percentage of net
deposits (adjusted for deposit runoff projections) and short-term liabilities
was 27.55% at March 31, 2008 and 28.04% at December 31, 2007. The
minimum required liquidity ratio as defined in the Bank’s Asset/Liability and
Interest Rate Risk Management Policy is 20%.
Contractual Obligations and
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. The Company’s contractual
obligations and other commitments as of March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007 are
summarized in the table below. The Company’s contractual obligations
include the repayment of principal and interest related to FHLB advances and
junior subordinated debentures, as well as certain payments under current lease
agreements. Other commitments include commitments to extend
credit. Because not all of these commitments to extend credit will be
drawn upon, the actual cash requirements are likely to be significantly less
than the amounts reported for other commitments below.
CONTRACTUAL
OBLIGATIONS AND OTHER COMMITMENTS:
|
|||||||
(Dollars
in Thousands)
|
|||||||
|
|||||||
March 31, 2008 | December 31, 2008 | ||||||
Contractual Cash Obligations | |||||||
Long-term
borrowings
|
$ | 77,000 | 77,000 | ||||
Junior
subordinated debentures
|
20,619 | 20,619 | |||||
Operating
lease obligations
|
5,129 | 5,290 | |||||
Total
|
$ | 102,748 | 102,909 | ||||
Other
Commitments
|
|||||||
Commitments
to extend credit
|
$ | 182,752 | 190,654 | ||||
Standby
letters of credit and financial guarantees written
|
3,038 | 3,894 | |||||
Total
|
$ | 185,790 | 194,548 |
The
Company enters into derivative contracts to manage various financial
risks. A derivative is a financial instrument that derives its cash
flows, and therefore its value, by reference to an underlying instrument, index
or referenced interest rate. Derivative contracts are carried at fair
value on the consolidated balance sheet with the fair value representing the net
present value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market
interest rates as of the balance sheet date. Derivative contracts are
written in amounts referred to as notional amounts, which only provide the basis
for calculating payments between counterparties and are not a measure of
financial risk. Further discussions of derivative instruments are
included above in the section entitled “Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk
Management”.
Capital
Resources. Shareholders’ equity at March 31, 2008 was $73.3
million compared to $70.1 million at December 31, 2007. At March 31,
2008 and December 31, 2007, unrealized gains (losses), net of taxes, amounted to
unrealized gains of $4.3 million and $1.7 million, respectively. The
increase in unrealized gains (losses) at March 31, 2008 is primarily
attributable to an increase in the market value of available for sale securities
and derivative instruments. Annualized return on average equity for
the three months ended March 31, 2008 was 11.26% compared to 13.59% for the year
ended December 31, 2007. Total cash dividends paid during the three
months ended March 31, 2008 amounted to $672,000 million as compared to total
cash dividends of $460,000 paid for the first three months of 2007.
In
November 2006, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up
to $2.0 million in common shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock
through its existing Stock Repurchase Plan effective through the end of November
2007. During 2007 the Company repurchased $1.9 million, or 100,000
shares, of its common stock under this plan.
19
In August
2007, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to 75,000
common shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock through its existing
Stock Repurchase Plan effective through the end of August 2008. The
Company has repurchased 75,497 shares, or $1.2 million, of its common stock
under this plan as of March 31, 2008. The Board of Directors ratified
the purchase of 497 additional shares in March 2008.
In March
2008, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized the repurchase of up to
100,000 common shares of the Company’s outstanding common stock through its
existing Stock Repurchase Plan effective through the end of March
2009. As of March 31, 2008, no shares have been repurchased under
this plan.
Under the
regulatory capital guidelines, financial institutions are currently required to
maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, with a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater. Tier 1 capital is
generally defined as shareholders' equity and Trust Preferred Securities less
all intangible assets and goodwill. Tier 1 capital at March 31, 2008
and December 31, 2007 includes $20.0 million in trust preferred
securities. The Company’s Tier 1 capital ratio was 11.14% and 11.03%
at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. Total
risk-based capital is defined as Tier 1 capital plus supplementary
capital. Supplementary capital, or Tier 2 capital, consists of the
Company's allowance for loan losses, not exceeding 1.25% of the Company's
risk-weighted assets. Total risk-based capital ratio is therefore defined as the
ratio of total capital (Tier 1 capital and Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted
assets. The Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 12.31% and
12.16% at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007, respectively. In
addition to the Tier 1 and total risk-based capital requirements, financial
institutions are also required to maintain a leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to
total average assets of 4.0% or greater. The Company’s Tier 1
leverage capital ratio was 9.85% and 10.43% at March 31, 2008 and December 31,
2007, respectively.
The
Bank’s Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 9.93% and 9.80% at March 31, 2008 and
December 31, 2007, respectively. The total risk-based capital ratio
for the Bank was 11.10% and 10.93% at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively. The Bank’s Tier 1 leverage capital ratio was
8.77% and 9.26% at March 31, 2008 and December 31, 2007,
respectively.
A bank is
considered to be "well capitalized" if it has a total risk-based capital ratio
of 10.0 % or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater, and
has a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater. Based upon these guidelines,
the Bank was considered to be "well capitalized" at March 31, 2008.
20
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
There have been no material changes
in the quantitative and qualitative disclosures about market risks as of March
31, 2008 from that presented in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended December 31, 2007.
21
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
The Company’s management, with the
participation of the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures (as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under
the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the
end of the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation,
the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have concluded
that, as of the end of such period, the Company’s disclosure controls and
procedures are effective in recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on
a timely basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act.
There have not been any changes in the
Company’s internal control over financial reporting (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal quarter
to which this report relates that have materially affected, or are reasonably
likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial
reporting.
22
PART
II.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
In the
opinion of management, the Company is not involved in any material pending legal
proceedings other than routine proceedings occurring in the ordinary course of
business.
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
There are
no material changes from the risk factors as previously disclosed in the
Company’s Form 10-K in response to Item 1A. to Part I to Form 10-K, filed with
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 12, 2008.
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of
Proceeds
|
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
||||||||||||||
Period
|
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
|
Average
Price
Paid
per
Share
|
Total
Number
of
Shares
Purchased
as
Part
of
Publicly
Announced
Plans
or
Programs
|
Maximum
Number
of
Shares
that
May
Yet Be
Purchased
Under
the Plans
or
Programs
|
||||||||||
January
1 - 31, 2008
|
- | $ | - | - | 24,503 | (1) | ||||||||
February
1 - 29, 2008
|
26,256 | 14.00 | 25,000 | - | ||||||||||
March
1 - 31, 2008
|
- | - | - | 100,000 | (2) | |||||||||
Total
|
26,256 | $ | 14.00 | 25,000 | ||||||||||
(1)
Reflects dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the Stock
Repurchase Plan through the end of August 31, 2008 as authorized by the
Company's Board of Directors in August 2007.
|
||||||||||||||
(2) Reflects
number of shares that may yet be purchased under the Stock Repurchase Plan
through the end of March 31, 2009 as authorized by the Company's Board of
Directors in March 2008.
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
Upon Senior Securities
|
Not
applicable
|
|
Item
4.
|
Submission
of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders
|
No
matter was submitted to a vote of the Company's shareholders during the
quarter ended March 31, 2008.
|
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
Not
applicable
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
|
Exhibit
(3)(i)
|
Articles
of Incorporation of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.,
incorporated
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (3)(i) to the Form 8-A filed with the
Securities
|
||
and
Exchange Commission on September 2,
1999
|
23
Exhibit
(3)(ii)
|
Amended
and Restated Bylaws of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (3)(ii) to the Form 10-Q filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on November 7, 2007
|
||
Exhibit
(4)
|
Specimen
Stock Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4) to the Form
8-
|
|
A
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September 2,
1999
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(a)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Tony W. Wolfe
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(a) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(b)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Joseph F. Beaman,
Jr.
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(b) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(c)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and William D. Cable,
Sr.
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(d) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(d)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and Lance A. Sellers
incorporated
|
|
by
reference to Exhibit (10)(e) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on March 30, 2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(e)
|
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus Stock Ownership and
Long
|
|
Term
Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(f) to the Form
10-K
|
||
filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 30,
2000
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(e)(i)
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. Omnibus
Stock
|
|
Ownership
and Long Term Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to
Exhibit
|
||
(10)(e)(i)
to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on
|
||
March
15, 2007
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(f)
|
Employment
Agreement between Peoples Bank and A. Joseph Lampron
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(g) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(g)
|
Peoples
Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral Plan, incorporated by reference
to
|
|
Exhibit
(10)(h) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange
|
||
Commission
on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(h)
|
Rabbi
Trust for the Peoples Bank Directors' and Officers' Deferral
Plan,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(i)
|
Description
of Service Recognition Program maintained by Peoples
Bank,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(i) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 27, 2003
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(j)
|
Capital
Securities Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 2006, by and
among
|
|
Peoples
Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc., PEBK Capital Trust II and Bear,
Sterns
|
||
Securities
Corp. incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(j) to the Form
10-Q
|
||
filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13,
2006
|
||
Exhibit
(10)(k)
|
Amended
and Restated Trust Agreement of PEBK Capital Trust II, dated as
of
|
|
June
28, 2006 incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(k) to the Form 10-Q
filed
|
||
with
the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13,
2006
|
Exhibit
(10)(l)
|
Guarantee
Agreement of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. dated as of
June
|
|
28,
2006 incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(l) to the Form 10-Q filed
with
|
||
the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13,
2006
|
24
Exhibit
(10)(m)
|
Indenture,
dated as of June 28, 2006, by and between Peoples Bancorp of
North
|
|
Carolina,
Inc. and LaSalle Bank National Association, as Trustee, relating
to
|
||
Junior
Subordinated Debt Securities Due September 15, 2036 incorporated
by
|
||
reference
to Exhibit (10)(m) to the Form 10-Q filed with Securities
and
|
||
Exchange
Commission on November 13,
2006
|
Exhibit
(14)
|
Code
of Business Conduct and Ethics of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.,
|
|
incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (14) to the Form 10-K filed with
the
|
||
Securities
and Exchange Commission on March 25,
2005
|
Exhibit
(31)(a)
|
Certification
of principal executive officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-
|
|
Oxley
Act of 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(31)(b)
|
Certification
of principal financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-
|
|
Oxley
Act of 2002
|
||
Exhibit
(32)
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to
Section
|
|
906
of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of
2002
|
25
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to
be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly
authorized.
Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina,
Inc.
May
8, 2008
|
/s/
Tony W. Wolfe
|
|
Date
|
Tony
W. Wolfe
|
|
President
and Chief Executive Officer
|
||
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
||
May
8, 2008
|
/s/
A. Joseph Lampron
|
|
Date
|
A.
Joseph Lampron
|
|
Executive
Vice President and Chief Financial Officer
|
||
(Principal
Financial and Principal Accounting
Officer)
|
26