PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA INC - Quarter Report: 2018 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED STATES SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
☒
QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
quarterly period ended: June 30,
2018
OR
☐
TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d)
OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from __________ to __________
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
North Carolina
(State
or other jurisdiction of incorporation or
organization)
000-27205
|
|
56-2132396
|
(Commission
File No.)
|
|
(IRS
Employer Identification No.)
|
518 West C Street, Newton, North Carolina
|
|
28658
|
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
|
(Zip
Code)
|
(828) 464-5620
(Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports
required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to file such
reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for
the past 90 days. Yes ☒ No ☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every
Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant
to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 232.405 of
this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post
such files). Yes ☒ No
☐
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer,
an accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2
of the Exchange Act. (Check one): Yes ☒ No
☐
Large
accelerated filer
|
☐
|
Accelerated
filer
|
☒
|
Non-accelerated
filer
|
☐ (Do not check if a smaller reporting
company)
|
Smaller
reporting company
|
☐
|
|
|
Emerging
growth company
|
☐
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined
in Exchange Act Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).
Yes
☐ No ☒
Indicate
the number of shares outstanding of each of the registrant's
classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.
5,995,256 shares of
common stock, outstanding at July 31, 2018.
INDEX
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
|
PAGE(S)
|
Item
1.
|
Financial
Statements
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets at June 30, 2018 (Unaudited) and December 31, 2017
(Audited)
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Earnings for the three and six months ended June 30,
2018 and 2017 (Unaudited)
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Comprehensive Income for the three and six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (Unaudited)
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Shareholders' Equity for the six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 (Unaudited)
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and
2017 (Unaudited)
|
7-8
|
|
|
|
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
|
9-28
|
|
|
|
Item
2.
|
Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of
Operations
|
29-41
|
|
|
|
Item
3.
|
Quantitative
and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
|
42
|
|
|
|
Item
4.
|
Controls
and Procedures
|
42
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1.
|
Legal
Proceedings
|
42
|
Item
1A.
|
Risk
Factors
|
42
|
Item
2.
|
Unregistered
Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds
|
43
|
Item
3.
|
Defaults
upon Senior Securities
|
43
|
Item
5.
|
Other
Information
|
43
|
Item
6.
|
Exhibits
|
43-45
|
Signatures
|
|
46
|
Certifications
|
|
47-49
|
Statements made in
this Form 10-Q, other than those concerning historical information,
should be considered forward-looking statements pursuant to the
safe harbor provisions of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and
the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995. These
forward-looking statements involve risks and uncertainties and are
based on the beliefs and assumptions of management and on the
information available to management at the time that this Form 10-Q
was prepared. These statements can be identified by the use of
words like “expect,” “anticipate,”
“estimate,” and “believe,” variations of
these words and other similar expressions. Readers should not place
undue reliance on forward-looking statements as a number of
important factors could cause actual results to differ materially
from those in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could
cause actual results to differ include, but are not limited to, (1)
competition in the markets served by the registrant and its subsidiaries, (2)
changes in the interest rate environment, (3) general national,
regional or local economic conditions may be less favorable than
expected, resulting in, among other things, a deterioration in
credit quality and the possible impairment of collectibility of
loans, (4) legislative or regulatory changes, including changes in
accounting standards, (5) significant changes in the federal and
state legal and regulatory environments and tax laws, (6) the
impact of changes in monetary and fiscal policies, laws, rules and
regulations and (7) other risks and factors identified in other
filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including but
not limited to, those described in the registrant’s Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31,
2017.
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item
1. Financial Statements
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
(Dollars in thousands)
|
June
30,
|
December
31,
|
Assets
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Audited)
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from
banks, including reserve requirements
|
|
|
of $10,866 at
06/30/18 and $7,472 at 12/31/17
|
$45,481
|
53,186
|
Interest-bearing
deposits
|
24,074
|
4,118
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
69,555
|
57,304
|
|
|
|
Investment
securities available for sale
|
210,055
|
229,321
|
Other
investments
|
4,427
|
1,830
|
Total
securities
|
214,482
|
231,151
|
|
|
|
Mortgage loans held
for sale
|
671
|
857
|
|
|
|
Loans
|
781,884
|
759,764
|
Less allowance for
loan losses
|
(6,277)
|
(6,366)
|
Net
loans
|
775,607
|
753,398
|
|
|
|
Premises and
equipment, net
|
19,606
|
19,911
|
Cash surrender
value of life insurance
|
15,743
|
15,552
|
Other real
estate
|
90
|
118
|
Accrued interest
receivable and other assets
|
15,418
|
13,875
|
Total
assets
|
$1,111,172
|
1,092,166
|
|
|
|
Liabilities and
Shareholders' Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits:
|
|
|
Noninterest-bearing
demand
|
$313,976
|
285,406
|
NOW, MMDA &
savings
|
489,426
|
498,445
|
Time, $250,000 or
more
|
17,371
|
18,756
|
Other
time
|
94,239
|
104,345
|
Total
deposits
|
915,012
|
906,952
|
|
|
|
Securities sold
under agreements to repurchase
|
46,570
|
37,757
|
Junior subordinated
debentures
|
20,619
|
20,619
|
Accrued interest
payable and other liabilities
|
10,805
|
10,863
|
Total
liabilities
|
993,006
|
976,191
|
|
|
|
Commitments
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders'
equity:
|
|
|
Series A preferred
stock, $1,000 stated value; authorized
|
|
|
5,000,000 shares;
no shares issued and outstanding
|
-
|
-
|
Common stock, no
par value; authorized
|
|
|
20,000,000 shares;
issued and outstanding 5,995,256 shares
|
62,096
|
62,096
|
Retained
earnings
|
55,198
|
50,286
|
Accumulated other
comprehensive income
|
872
|
3,593
|
Total shareholders'
equity
|
118,166
|
115,975
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
and shareholders' equity
|
$1,111,172
|
1,092,166
|
See accompanying
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
3
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Earnings
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
(Dollars in thousands, except per share amounts)
|
Three months
ended
|
Six months
ended
|
||
|
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
income:
|
|
|
|
|
Interest and fees
on loans
|
$9,386
|
8,689
|
18,455
|
16,969
|
Interest on due
from banks
|
124
|
48
|
169
|
78
|
Interest on
investment securities:
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government
sponsored enterprises
|
524
|
613
|
1,130
|
1,217
|
State and political
subdivisions
|
980
|
1,067
|
1,976
|
2,151
|
Other
|
45
|
44
|
88
|
110
|
Total interest
income
|
11,059
|
10,461
|
21,818
|
20,525
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
NOW, MMDA &
savings deposits
|
186
|
143
|
362
|
275
|
Time
deposits
|
110
|
120
|
215
|
248
|
FHLB
borrowings
|
-
|
201
|
-
|
393
|
Junior subordinated
debentures
|
198
|
145
|
369
|
280
|
Other
|
19
|
13
|
34
|
24
|
Total interest
expense
|
513
|
622
|
980
|
1,220
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
10,546
|
9,839
|
20,838
|
19,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
Provision for
(reduction of provision for) loan losses
|
231
|
49
|
262
|
(187)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest income
after provision for loan losses
|
10,315
|
9,790
|
20,576
|
19,492
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
income:
|
|
|
|
|
Service
charges
|
1,056
|
1,094
|
2,080
|
2,200
|
Other service
charges and fees
|
175
|
147
|
355
|
302
|
Gain on sale of
securities
|
50
|
-
|
50
|
-
|
Mortgage banking
income
|
240
|
319
|
456
|
665
|
Insurance and
brokerage commissions
|
203
|
179
|
385
|
347
|
Appraisal
management fee income
|
854
|
849
|
1,643
|
1,592
|
Gain/(loss) on sale
and write-down of
|
|
|
|
|
other real
estate
|
(3)
|
-
|
3
|
(283)
|
Miscellaneous
|
1,441
|
1,341
|
2,780
|
2,548
|
Total non-interest
income
|
4,016
|
3,929
|
7,752
|
7,371
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
Salaries and
employee benefits
|
5,385
|
4,871
|
10,347
|
10,105
|
Occupancy
|
1,750
|
1,699
|
3,606
|
3,312
|
Professional
fees
|
373
|
236
|
753
|
485
|
Advertising
|
260
|
366
|
501
|
612
|
Debit card
expense
|
283
|
268
|
492
|
574
|
FDIC
Insurance
|
84
|
87
|
167
|
173
|
Appraisal
management fee expense
|
654
|
648
|
1,246
|
1,214
|
Other
|
1,771
|
1,808
|
3,490
|
3,869
|
Total non-interest
expense
|
10,560
|
9,983
|
20,602
|
20,344
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings before
income taxes
|
3,771
|
3,736
|
7,726
|
6,519
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax
expense
|
595
|
925
|
1,247
|
1,503
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings
|
$3,176
|
2,811
|
6,479
|
5,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic net earnings
per share
|
$0.53
|
0.47
|
1.08
|
0.84
|
Diluted net
earnings per share
|
$0.53
|
0.47
|
1.08
|
0.83
|
Cash dividends
declared per share
|
$0.13
|
0.11
|
0.26
|
0.22
|
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
4
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income
Three and Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
(Dollars in thousands)
|
Three months
ended
|
Six months
ended
|
||
|
June
30,
|
June
30,
|
||
|
2018
|
2017
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
earnings
|
$3,176
|
2,811
|
6,479
|
5,016
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive
income:
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding
gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
|
|
available for
sale
|
(869)
|
2,107
|
(3,483)
|
2,694
|
Reclassification
adjustment for gains on
|
|
|
|
|
securities
available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
included in net
earnings
|
(50)
|
-
|
(50)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other
comprehensive income (loss),
|
|
|
|
|
before income
taxes
|
(919)
|
2,107
|
(3,533)
|
2,694
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income tax expense
related to other
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized holding
gains (losses) on securities
|
|
|
|
|
available for
sale
|
(200)
|
758
|
(801)
|
742
|
Reclassification
adjustment for gains
|
|
|
|
|
on securities
available for sale
|
|
|
|
|
included in net
earnings
|
(11)
|
-
|
(11)
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total income tax
expense related to
|
|
|
|
|
other comprehensive
income (loss)
|
(211)
|
758
|
(812)
|
742
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total other
comprehensive income (loss),
|
|
|
|
|
net of
tax
|
(708)
|
1,349
|
(2,721)
|
1,952
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive
income
|
$2,468
|
4,160
|
3,758
|
6,968
|
See accompanying
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
5
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Shareholders'
Equity
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
(Dollars in thousands)
|
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Earnings
|
Income
|
Total
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December
31, 2017
|
5,995,256
|
$62,096
|
50,286
|
3,593
|
115,975
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
declared on
|
|
|
|
|
|
common
stock
|
-
|
-
|
(1,567)
|
-
|
(1,567)
|
Net
earnings
|
-
|
-
|
6,479
|
-
|
6,479
|
Change in
accumulated other
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive
income, net of tax
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,721)
|
(2,721)
|
Balance, June 30,
2018
|
5,995,256
|
$62,096
|
55,198
|
872
|
118,166
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, December
31, 2016
|
5,417,800
|
$44,187
|
60,254
|
2,987
|
107,428
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash dividends
declared on
|
|
|
|
|
|
common
stock
|
-
|
-
|
(1,316)
|
-
|
(1,316)
|
Restricted stock
units exercised
|
30,654
|
852
|
-
|
-
|
852
|
Net
earnings
|
-
|
-
|
5,016
|
-
|
5,016
|
Change in
accumulated other
|
|
|
|
|
|
comprehensive
income, net of tax
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,952
|
1,952
|
Balance, June 30,
2017
|
5,448,454
|
$45,039
|
63,954
|
4,939
|
113,932
|
See
accompanying Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements.
6
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
operating activities:
|
|
|
Net
earnings
|
$6,479
|
5,016
|
Adjustments to
reconcile net earnings to
|
|
|
net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
|
|
Depreciation,
amortization and accretion
|
2,418
|
2,506
|
Provision
(reduction of provision) for loan losses
|
262
|
(187)
|
Deferred income
taxes
|
(7)
|
(1,122)
|
Gain on sale of
investment securities
|
(50)
|
-
|
Gain on sale of
other real estate
|
(3)
|
-
|
Write-down of other
real estate
|
-
|
283
|
Loss on sale of
premises and equipment
|
2
|
32
|
Restricted stock
expense
|
139
|
471
|
Proceeds from sales
of mortgage loans held for sale
|
18,475
|
34,845
|
Origination of
mortgage loans held for sale
|
(18,289)
|
(32,649)
|
Change
in:
|
|
|
Cash surrender
value of life insurance
|
(191)
|
(399)
|
Other
assets
|
(1,249)
|
230
|
Other
liabilities
|
(197)
|
(240)
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided
by operating activities
|
7,789
|
8,786
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
investing activities:
|
|
|
Purchases of
investment securities available for sale
|
(17,347)
|
(3,138)
|
Proceeds from
sales, calls and maturities of investment securities
|
|
|
available for
sale
|
23,384
|
4,285
|
Proceeds from
paydowns of investment securities available for sale
|
8,519
|
8,682
|
Purchases of other
investments
|
(2,611)
|
|
Proceeds from
paydowns on other investments
|
29
|
|
Purchases of FHLB
stock
|
(4)
|
(45)
|
Net change in
loans
|
(22,044)
|
(21,423)
|
Purchases of
premises and equipment
|
(898)
|
(3,980)
|
Proceeds from sale
of other real estate and repossessions
|
128
|
-
|
|
|
|
Net cash used by
investing activities
|
(10,844)
|
(15,619)
|
|
|
|
Cash flows from
financing activities:
|
|
|
Net change in
deposits
|
8,060
|
(433)
|
Net change in
securities sold under agreement to repurchase
|
8,813
|
13,543
|
Proceeds from Fed
Funds purchased
|
850
|
-
|
Repayments of Fed
Funds purchased
|
(850)
|
-
|
Cash dividends paid
on common stock
|
(1,567)
|
(1,316)
|
|
|
|
Net cash provided
by financing activities
|
15,306
|
11,794
|
|
|
|
Net change in cash
and cash equivalents
|
12,251
|
4,961
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at beginning of period
|
57,304
|
70,094
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents at end of period
|
$69,555
|
75,055
|
7
PEOPLES BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, continued
Six Months Ended June 30, 2018 and 2017
(Dollars in thousands)
|
2018
|
2017
|
|
(Unaudited)
|
(Unaudited)
|
|
|
|
Supplemental
disclosures of cash flow information:
|
|
|
Cash paid during
the period for:
|
|
|
Interest
|
$973
|
1,241
|
Income
taxes
|
$252
|
40
|
|
|
|
Noncash investing
and financing activities:
|
|
|
Change in
unrealized gain on investment securities
|
|
|
available for
sale, net
|
$(2,721)
|
1,952
|
Issuance of accrued
restricted stock units
|
$-
|
(852)
|
Transfers of loans
to other real estate and repossessions
|
$97
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements.
8
PEOPLES
BANCORP OF NORTH CAROLINA, INC.
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
(1)
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The
consolidated financial statements include the financial statements
of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc. and its wholly owned
subsidiary, Peoples Bank (the “Bank”), along with the
Bank’s wholly owned subsidiaries, Peoples Investment
Services, Inc. (“PIS”), Real Estate Advisory Services,
Inc. (“REAS”), Community Bank Real Estate Solutions,
LLC (“CBRES”) and PB Real Estate Holdings, LLC
(collectively called the “Company”). All significant
intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in
consolidation.
The
Bank operates three banking offices focused on the Latino
population that were formerly operated as a division of the Bank
under the name Banco de la Gente (“Banco”). These
offices are now branded as Bank branches and considered a separate
market territory of the Bank as they offer normal and customary
banking services as are offered in the Bank’s other branches
such as the taking of deposits and the making of
loans.
The
consolidated financial statements in this report (other than the
Consolidated Balance Sheet at December 31, 2017) are unaudited. In
the opinion of management, all adjustments (none of which were
other than normal accruals) necessary for a fair presentation of
the financial position and results of operations for the periods
presented have been included. Management of the Company has made a
number of estimates and assumptions relating to the reporting of
assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities to prepare these consolidated financial statements in
conformity with generally accepted accounting principles in the
United States (“GAAP”). Actual results could differ
from those estimates.
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to
understanding management’s discussion and analysis of results
of operations and financial condition. Many of the Company’s
accounting policies require significant judgment regarding
valuation of assets and liabilities and/or significant
interpretation of the specific accounting guidance. A description
of the Company’s significant accounting policies can be found
in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements in the
Company’s 2017 Annual Report to Shareholders which is
Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the May 3, 2018 Annual
Meeting of Shareholders.
Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements
In May
2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”)
issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09,
(Topic 606): Revenue from
Contracts with Customers. ASU No. 2014-09 provides guidance
on the recognition
of revenue from contracts with customers. The core principle of the
new guidance is that an entity should recognize revenue to reflect
the transfer of goods and services to customers in an amount equal
to the consideration the entity receives or expects to receive. ASU
No. 2014-09 is effective for reporting periods beginning after
December 15, 2017.
The
Company has applied ASU No. 2014-09 using a modified retrospective
approach. The Company’s revenue is comprised of net interest
income and noninterest income. The scope of ASU No. 2014-09
explicitly excludes net interest income as well as many other
revenues for financial assets and liabilities including loans,
leases, securities, and derivatives. Accordingly, the majority of
the Company’s revenues are not affected. Appraisal management
fee income and expense from the Bank’s subsidiary, CBRES, was
reported as a net amount prior to March 31, 2018, which was
included in miscellaneous non-interest income. This income and
expense is now reported on separate line items under non-interest
income and non-interest expense. See below for additional information
related to revenue generated from contracts with
customers.
Revenue
and Method of Adoption
The
majority of our revenue is derived primarily from interest income
from receivables (loans) and securities. Other revenues are derived
from fees received in connection with deposit accounts, investment
advisory, and appraisal services. On January 1, 2018, we adopted
the requirements of ASU No. 2014-09. The core principle of the new
standard is that a company should recognize revenue to depict the
transfer of promised goods or services to customers in an amount
that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be
entitled in exchange for those goods or services.
9
The
Company adopted ASU No. 2014-09 using the modified retrospective
transition approach which does not require restatement of prior
periods. The method was selected as there were no material changes
in the timing of revenue recognition resulting in no comparability
issues with prior periods. This adoption method is considered a
change in accounting principle requiring additional disclosure of
the nature of and reason for the change, which is solely a result
of the adoption of the required standard. When applying the
modified retrospective approach under ASU No. 2014-09, the Company
has elected, as a practical expedient, to apply this approach only
to contracts that were not completed as of January 1, 2018. A
completed contract is considered to be a contract for which all (or
substantially all) of the revenue was recognized in accordance with
revenue guidance that was in effect before January 1, 2018. There
were no uncompleted contracts as of January 1, 2018 for which
application of the new standard required an adjustment to retained
earnings.
The
following disclosures involve our material income streams derived
from contracts with customers which are within the scope of ASU No.
2014-09. Through our wholly-owned subsidiary, PIS, we contract with
a registered investment advisor to perform investment advisory
services on behalf of our customers. We receive commissions from
this third party investment advisor based on the volume of business
that our customers do with such investment advisor. Total revenue
recognized from these contracts for the six months ended June 30,
2018 was $384,000. The Company utilizes third parties to contract
with our customers to perform debit and credit card clearing
services. These third parties pay us commissions based on the
volume of transactions that they process on behalf of our
customers. Total revenue recognized for the six months ended June
30, 2018 from the contract with these third parties was $1.9 million. Through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, REAS, we provide property appraisal services for
negotiated fee amounts on a per appraisal basis. Total revenue
recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2018 from these
contracts with customers was $278,000. Through our wholly-owned
subsidiary, CBRES, we provide appraisal management services. Total
revenue recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2018 from
these contracts with customers was $1.6 million. Due to the nature
of our relationship with the customers that we provide services, we
do not incur costs to obtain contracts and there are no material
incremental costs to fulfill these contracts that should be
capitalized.
Disaggregation of Revenue. Our
portfolio of services provided to our customers consists of over
50,000 active contracts. We have disaggregated revenue according to
timing of the transfer of service. Total revenue for the six months
ended June 30, 2018 derived from contracts in which services are
transferred at a point in time was approximately 5.7 million. None
of our revenue is derived from contracts in which services are
transferred over time. Revenue is recognized as the services are
provided to the customers. Economic factors impacting the customers
could affect the nature, amount, and timing of these cash flows, as
unfavorable economic conditions could impair the customers’
ability to provide payment for services. For our deposit contracts,
this risk is mitigated as we generally deduct payments from
customers’ accounts as services are rendered. For our
appraisal services, the risk is mitigated in that the appraisal is
not released until payment is received.
Contract Balances. The timing of
revenue recognition, billings, and cash collections results in
billed accounts receivable on the balance sheet. Most contracts
call for payment by a charge or deduction to the respective
customer account but there are some that require a receipt of
payment from the customer. For fee per transaction contracts, the
customers are billed as the transactions are processed. We have no
contracts in which customers are billed in advance for services to
be performed. These would create contract liabilities or deferred
revenue, as the customers pay in advance for services. There are no
contract liabilities or accounts receivables balances that are
material to the Company’s balance sheet.
Performance Obligations. A performance
obligation is a promise in a contract to transfer a distinct good
or service to the customer, and is the unit of account in ASU No.
2014-09. A contract’s transaction price is allocated to each
distinct performance obligation and recognized as revenue when, or
as, the performance obligation is satisfied. Performance
obligations are satisfied as the service is provided to the
customer at a point in time. There are no significant financing
components in our contracts. Excluding deposit and appraisal
service revenues which are primarily billed at a point in time as a
fee for services incurred, all other contracts within the scope of
ASU No. 2014-09 contain variable consideration in that fees earned
are derived from market values of accounts which determine the
amount of consideration to which we are entitled. The variability
is resolved when the services are provided. The contracts do not
include obligations for returns, refunds, or warranties. The
contracts are specific to the amounts owed to the Company for
services performed during a period should the contracts be
terminated.
Significant Judgements. All of the
contracts create performance obligations that are satisfied at a
point in time excluding some immaterial deposit revenues. Revenue
is recognized as services are billed to the customers. Variable
consideration does exist for contracts related to our contract with
the registered investment advisor as some revenues are based on
market values of accounts at the end of the period.
In
January 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01, (Subtopic 825-10):
Recognition and Measurement of
Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. ASU No. 2016-01
addresses certain aspects of recognition, measurement,
presentation, and disclosure of financial instruments. ASU No.
2016-01 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within
those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the
Company’s results of operations, financial position or
disclosures.
In
February 2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-02, (Topic 842):
Leases. ASU No. 2016-02
increases transparency and comparability among organizations by
recognizing lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet
and disclosing key information about leasing arrangements. ASU No.
2016-02 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within
those annual periods, beginning after December 15,
2018.
10
The
Company expects to adopt ASU No. 2016-02 using the modified
retrospective method and practical expedients for transition. The
practical expedients allow the Company to largely account for its
existing leases consistent with current guidance except for the
incremental balance sheet recognition for lessees. The Company has
started an initial evaluation of its leasing contracts and
activities and has started developing its methodology to estimate
the right-of use assets and lease liabilities, which is based on
the present value of lease payments (at December 31, 2017, the
future minimum lease payments were $4.8 million). While the Company
does not expect there to be a material change in the timing of
expense recognition, it is too early in the evaluation process to
determine if there will be a material change to the timing of
expense recognition. The Company is evaluating its existing
disclosures and may need to provide additional information as a
result of adoption of ASU No. 2016-02.
In June
2016, FASB issued ASU No. 2016-13, (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial
Instruments. ASU No. 2016-13 provides guidance to change the
accounting for credit losses and modify the impairment model for
certain debt securities. ASU No. 2016-13 is effective for annual
periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning
after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for all
organizations for periods beginning after December 15,
2018.
The
Company will apply the amendments to ASU No. 2016-13 through a
cumulative-effect adjustment to retained earnings as of the
beginning of the year of adoption. While early adoption is
permitted beginning in the first quarter of 2019, the Company does
not expect to elect that option. The Company is evaluating the
impact of ASU No. 2016-13 on its consolidated financial statements.
The Company anticipates that ASU No. 2016-13 will have no material
impact on the recorded allowance for loan losses given the change
to estimated losses over the contractual life of the loans adjusted
for expected prepayments. In addition to the Company’s
allowance for loan losses, it will also record an allowance for
credit losses on debt securities instead of applying the impairment
model currently utilized. The amount of the adjustments will be
impacted by each portfolio’s composition and credit quality
at the adoption date as well as economic conditions and forecasts
at that time.
In
January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, (Topic 805):
Clarifying the Definition of a
Business. ASU No. 2017-01 adds guidance to assist companies
and other reporting organizations with evaluating whether
transactions should be accounted for as acquisitions (or disposals)
of assets or businesses. ASU No. 2017-01 is effective for annual
periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning
after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have
a material impact on the Company’s results of operations,
financial position or disclosures.
In
January 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-04, (Topic 350):
Simplifying the Test for Goodwill
Impairment. ASU No. 2017-04 provides guidance to simplify the accounting related
to goodwill impairment. ASU No. 2017-04 is effective for annual
periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning
after December 15, 2019. The adoption of this guidance is not
expected to have a material impact on the Company’s results
of operations, financial position or disclosures.
In
February 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-05, (Subtopic 610-20):
Clarifying the Scope of Asset
Derecognition Guidance and Accounting for Partial Sales of
Nonfinancial Assets. ASU No. 2017-05 clarifies the scope of
established guidance on nonfinancial asset derecognition (issued as
part of the new revenue standard, ASU No. 2014-09, Revenue from Contracts with Customers),
as well as the accounting for partial sales of nonfinancial assets.
ASU No. 2017-05 is effective for annual periods, and interim
periods within those annual periods, beginning after December 15,
2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact
on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or
disclosures.
In
March 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-07, (Topic 715): Improving the Presentation of Net Periodic
Pension Cost and Net Periodic Postretirement Benefit Costs.
ASU No. 2017-07 amended the requirements related to the income
statement presentation of the components of net periodic
benefit cost for an entity’s sponsored defined
benefit pension and other postretirement plans. ASU No.
2017-07 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within
those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. The
adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the
Company’s results of operations, financial position or
disclosures.
In
March 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-08, (Subtopic 310-20):
Premium Amortization on Purchased
Callable Debt Securities. ASU No. 2017-08 amended the
requirements related to the amortization period for certain
purchased callable debt securities held at a premium. ASU No.
2017-08 is effective for annual periods, and interim periods within
those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2018. The
adoption of this guidance is not expected to have a material impact
on the Company’s results of operations, financial position or
disclosures.
11
In May
2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-09, (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting. ASU
No. 2017-09 amended the
requirements related to changes to the terms or conditions of a
share-based payment award. ASU No. 2017-09 is effective for annual
periods, and interim periods within those annual periods, beginning
after December 15, 2017. The adoption of this guidance did not have
a material impact on the Company’s results of operations,
financial position or disclosures.
In
September 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-13, Revenue Recognition (Topic 605), Revenue from
Contracts with Customers (Topic 606), Leases (Topic 840), and
Leases (Topic 842). ASU No. 2017-13 updated the Revenue from
Contracts with Customers and the Leases Topics of the Accounting
Standards Codification. The amendments incorporate into the
Accounting Standards Codification recent Securities Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) guidance about certain public
business entities (PBEs) electing to use the non-PBE effective
dates solely to adopt the FASB’s new standards on revenue and
leases. ASU No. 2017-13 was effective upon issuance. The adoption of this guidance did
not have a material impact on the Company’s results of
operations, financial position or disclosures.
In
November 2017, FASB issued ASU No. 2017-14, Income Statement—Reporting
Comprehensive, Income (Topic 220), Revenue Recognition (Topic 605),
and Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606). ASU
No. 2017-14 incorporates into the Accounting Standards Codification
recent SEC guidance related to revenue recognition. ASU No. 2017-14
was effective upon issuance. The adoption of this guidance did not
have a material impact on the Company’s results of
operations, financial position or disclosures.
In
February 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-02, Income Statement (Topic 220): Reclassification
of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive
Income. ASU No. 2018-02 requires companies to reclassify the
stranded effects in other comprehensive income to retained earnings
as a result of the change in the tax rates under the Tax Cuts and
Jobs Act (“TCJA”). The Company has opted to early adopt
this pronouncement by retrospective application to each period in
which the effect of the change in the tax rate under the TCJA is
recognized. The impact of the reclassification from other
comprehensive income to retained earnings at December 31, 2017 was
$607,000.
In
February 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-03, Technical Corrections and Improvements to
Financial Instruments—Overall (Subtopic 825-10) Recognition
and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial
Liabilities. ASU No. 2018-03 clarifies certain aspects of
the guidance issued in ASU 2016-01. ASU No. 2018-03 is effective
for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, and interim
periods within those fiscal years beginning after June 15, 2018.
The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on the
Company’s results of operations, financial position or
disclosures.
In
March 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-04, Investments—Debt Securities (Topic 320)
and Regulated Operations (Topic 980): Amendments to SEC Paragraphs
Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 117 and SEC Release
No. 33-9273 (SEC Update). ASU No. 2018-04 incorporates
recent SEC guidance which was issued in order to make the relevant
interpretive guidance consistent with current authoritative
accounting and auditing guidance and SEC rules and regulation. ASU
No. 2018-04 was effective upon issuance. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s
results of operations, financial position or
disclosures.
In
March 2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-05, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Amendments to SEC
Paragraphs Pursuant to SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 118 (SEC
Update). ASU No. 2018-05 incorporates recent SEC guidance
related to the income tax accounting implications of the TCJA. ASU
No. 2018-05 was effective upon issuance. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a material impact on the Company’s
results of operations, financial position or
disclosures.
In May
2018, FASB issued ASU 2018-06, Codification Improvements to Topic 942:
Financial Services—Depository and Lending. ASU No.
2018-06 eliminates a reference to the Office of the Comptroller of
the Currency’s Banking Circular 202, Accounting for Net Deferred Tax
Charges, from the Accounting Standards Codification. The
Office of the Comptroller of the Currency published the guidance in
1985 but has since rescinded it. The amendments were effective upon
issuance. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material
impact on the Company’s results of operations, financial
position or disclosures.
Other
accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by FASB or
other standards-setting bodies are not expected to have a material
impact on the Company’s results of operations,
financial position or disclosures.
12
(2)
Investment Securities
Investment
securities available for sale at June 30, 2018 and December 31,
2017 are as follows:
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2018
|
|||
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$46,213
|
321
|
813
|
45,721
|
U.S.
Government
|
|
|
|
|
sponsored
enterprises
|
38,528
|
10
|
1,001
|
37,537
|
State and political
subdivisions
|
122,930
|
2,749
|
144
|
125,535
|
Corporate
bonds
|
1,000
|
12
|
-
|
1,012
|
Trust preferred
securities
|
250
|
-
|
-
|
250
|
Total
|
$208,921
|
3,092
|
1,958
|
210,055
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
December
31, 2017
|
|||
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Gross
Unrealized Gains
|
Gross
Unrealized Losses
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$53,124
|
814
|
329
|
53,609
|
U.S.
Government
|
|
|
|
|
sponsored
enterprises
|
40,504
|
140
|
264
|
40,380
|
State and political
subdivisions
|
129,276
|
4,310
|
16
|
133,570
|
Corporate
bonds
|
1,500
|
12
|
-
|
1,512
|
Trust preferred
securities
|
250
|
-
|
-
|
250
|
Total
|
$224,654
|
5,276
|
609
|
229,321
|
|
|
|
|
|
The
current fair value and associated unrealized losses on investments
in securities with unrealized losses at June 30, 2018 and December
31, 2017 are summarized in the tables below, with the length of
time the individual securities have been in a continuous loss
position.
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2018
|
|||||
|
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
Total
|
|||
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$18,692
|
255
|
11,373
|
558
|
30,065
|
813
|
U.S.
Government
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
sponsored
enterprises
|
26,635
|
663
|
9,891
|
338
|
36,526
|
1,001
|
State and political
subdivisions
|
9,760
|
117
|
964
|
27
|
10,724
|
144
|
Total
|
$55,087
|
1,035
|
22,228
|
923
|
77,315
|
1,958
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|||||
|
Less
than 12 Months
|
12
Months or More
|
Total
|
|||
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Fair
Value
|
Unrealized
Losses
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$8,701
|
75
|
11,259
|
254
|
19,960
|
329
|
U.S.
Government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
sponsored
enterprises
|
12,661
|
98
|
10,067
|
166
|
22,728
|
264
|
State and political
subdivisions
|
798
|
2
|
1,501
|
14
|
2,299
|
16
|
Total
|
$22,160
|
175
|
22,827
|
434
|
44,987
|
609
|
At June
30, 2018, unrealized losses in the investment securities portfolio
relating to debt securities totaled $2.0 million. The unrealized
losses on these debt securities arose due to changing interest
rates and are considered to be temporary. From the June 30, 2018
tables above, 15 out of 153 securities issued by state and
political subdivisions contained unrealized losses and 35 out of 43
securities issued by U.S. Government sponsored enterprises
contained unrealized losses. These unrealized losses are considered
temporary because of acceptable financial condition and results of
operations of entities that issued each security and the repayment
sources of principal and interest on U.S. Government sponsored
enterprises, including mortgage-backed securities, are government
backed.
13
The
amortized cost and estimated fair value of investment securities
available for sale at June 30, 2018, by contractual maturity, are
shown below. Expected maturities of mortgage-backed securities will
differ from contractual maturities because borrowers have the right
to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
June 30,
2018
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
Amortized
Cost
|
Estimated
Fair Value
|
Due within one
year
|
$22,613
|
22,809
|
Due from one to
five years
|
97,045
|
98,725
|
Due from five to
ten years
|
37,351
|
37,068
|
Due after ten
years
|
5,449
|
5,482
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
46,213
|
45,721
|
Trust preferred
securities
|
250
|
250
|
Total
|
$208,921
|
210,055
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from sales
of securities available for sale during the three and six months
ended June 30, 2018 were $14.0 million and resulted in net gains of
$50,000. No securities available for sale were sold during the
three and six months ended June 30, 2017.
Securities with a
fair value of approximately $89.5 million and $105.6 million at
June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively, were pledged to
secure public deposits and for other purposes as required by
law.
14
(3)
Loans
Major
classifications of loans at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are
summarized as follows:
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
June
30,
2018
|
December
31,
2017
|
Real estate
loans:
|
|
|
Construction and
land development
|
$79,769
|
84,987
|
Single-family
residential
|
250,620
|
246,703
|
Single-family
residential -
|
|
|
Banco de la Gente
stated income
|
35,847
|
37,249
|
Commercial
|
269,792
|
248,637
|
Multifamily and
farmland
|
28,667
|
28,937
|
Total real estate
loans
|
664,695
|
646,513
|
|
|
|
Loans not secured
by real estate:
|
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
93,580
|
89,022
|
Farm
loans
|
1,023
|
1,204
|
Consumer
loans
|
9,422
|
9,888
|
All other
loans
|
13,164
|
13,137
|
|
|
|
Total
loans
|
781,884
|
759,764
|
|
|
|
Less allowance for
loan losses
|
6,277
|
6,366
|
|
|
|
Total net
loans
|
$775,607
|
753,398
|
|
|
|
The
Bank grants loans and extensions of credit primarily within the
Catawba Valley region of North Carolina, which encompasses Catawba,
Alexander, Iredell and Lincoln counties, and also in Mecklenburg,
Wake and Durham counties of North Carolina. Although the Bank has a
diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of the loan
portfolio is collateralized by improved and unimproved real estate,
the value of which is dependent upon the real estate market. Risk
characteristics of the major components of the Bank’s loan
portfolio are discussed below:
●
Construction and
land development loans – The risk of loss is largely
dependent on the initial estimate of whether the property’s
value at completion equals or exceeds the cost of property
construction and the availability of take-out financing. During the
construction phase, a number of factors can result in delays or
cost overruns. If the estimate is inaccurate or if actual
construction costs exceed estimates, the value of the property
securing the loan may be insufficient to ensure full repayment when
completed through a permanent loan, sale of the property, or by
seizure of collateral. As of June 30, 2018, construction and land
development loans comprised approximately 10% of the Bank’s
total loan portfolio.
●
Single-family
residential loans – Declining home sales volumes, decreased
real estate values and higher than normal levels of unemployment
could contribute to losses on these loans. As of June 30, 2018,
single-family residential loans comprised approximately 37% of the
Bank’s total loan portfolio, and include Banco’s
single-family residential stated income loans, which were
approximately 5% of the Bank’s total loan
portfolio.
●
Commercial real
estate loans – Repayment is dependent on income being
generated in amounts sufficient to cover operating expenses and
debt service. These loans also involve greater risk because they
are generally not fully amortizing over a loan period, but rather
have a balloon payment due at maturity. A borrower’s ability
to make a balloon payment typically will depend on being able to
either refinance the loan or timely sell the underlying property.
As of June 30, 2018, commercial real estate loans comprised
approximately 35% of the Bank’s total loan
portfolio.
●
Commercial loans
– Repayment is generally dependent upon the successful
operation of the borrower’s business. In addition, the
collateral securing the loans may depreciate over time, be
difficult to appraise, be illiquid or fluctuate in value based on
the success of the business. As of June 30, 2018, commercial loans
comprised approximately 12% of the Bank’s total loan
portfolio.
15
Loans
are considered past due if the required principal and interest
payments have not been received as of the date such payments were
due. Loans are placed on non-accrual status when, in
management’s opinion, the borrower may be unable to meet
payment obligations as they become due, as well as when required by
regulatory provisions. Loans may be placed on non-accrual status
regardless of whether or not such loans are considered past due.
When interest accrual is discontinued, all unpaid accrued interest
is reversed. Interest income is subsequently recognized only to the
extent cash payments are received in excess of principal due. Loans
are returned to accrual status when all of the principal and
interest amounts contractually due are brought current and future
payments are reasonably assured.
The
following tables present an age analysis of past due loans, by loan
type, as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017:
June 30,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
30-89 Days Past Due
|
Loans 90
or More Days Past Due
|
Total
Past Due Loans
|
Total
Current Loans
|
Total
Loans
|
Accruing
Loans 90 or More Days Past Due
|
Real estate
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and
land development
|
$631
|
-
|
631
|
79,138
|
79,769
|
-
|
Single-family
residential
|
1,251
|
481
|
1,732
|
248,888
|
250,620
|
-
|
Single-family
residential -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco de la Gente
stated income
|
940
|
232
|
1,172
|
34,675
|
35,847
|
-
|
Commercial
|
946
|
202
|
1,148
|
268,644
|
269,792
|
-
|
Multifamily and
farmland
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
28,667
|
28,667
|
-
|
Total real estate
loans
|
3,768
|
915
|
4,683
|
660,012
|
664,695
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not secured
by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
4
|
94
|
98
|
93,482
|
93,580
|
-
|
Farm
loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,023
|
1,023
|
-
|
Consumer
loans
|
158
|
5
|
163
|
9,259
|
9,422
|
-
|
All other
loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
13,164
|
13,164
|
-
|
Total
loans
|
$3,930
|
1,014
|
4,944
|
776,940
|
781,884
|
-
|
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
30-89 Days Past Due
|
Loans 90
or More Days Past Due
|
Total
Past Due Loans
|
Total
Current Loans
|
Total
Loans
|
Accruing
Loans 90 or More Days Past Due
|
Real estate
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and
land development
|
$277
|
-
|
277
|
84,710
|
84,987
|
-
|
Single-family
residential
|
3,241
|
193
|
3,434
|
243,269
|
246,703
|
-
|
Single-family
residential -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco de la Gente
stated income
|
4,078
|
465
|
4,543
|
32,706
|
37,249
|
-
|
Commercial
|
588
|
-
|
588
|
248,049
|
248,637
|
-
|
Multifamily and
farmland
|
-
|
12
|
12
|
28,925
|
28,937
|
-
|
Total real estate
loans
|
8,184
|
670
|
8,854
|
637,659
|
646,513
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not secured
by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
53
|
100
|
153
|
88,869
|
89,022
|
-
|
Farm
loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,204
|
1,204
|
-
|
Consumer
loans
|
113
|
5
|
118
|
9,770
|
9,888
|
-
|
All other
loans
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
13,137
|
13,137
|
-
|
Total
loans
|
$8,350
|
775
|
9,125
|
750,639
|
759,764
|
-
|
16
The
following table presents non-accrual loans as of June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017:
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
June
30,
2018
|
December
31,
2017
|
Real estate
loans:
|
|
|
Construction and
land development
|
$123
|
14
|
Single-family
residential
|
1,829
|
1,634
|
Single-family
residential -
|
|
|
Banco de la Gente
stated income
|
1,467
|
1,543
|
Commercial
|
768
|
396
|
Multifamily
and farmland
|
-
|
12
|
Total real estate
loans
|
4,187
|
3,599
|
|
|
|
Loans not secured
by real estate:
|
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
94
|
100
|
Consumer
loans
|
11
|
12
|
Total
|
$4,292
|
3,711
|
At each
reporting period, the Bank determines which loans are impaired.
Accordingly, the Bank’s impaired loans are reported at their
estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis. An allowance for
each impaired loan that is collateral-dependent is calculated based
on the fair value of its collateral. The fair value of the
collateral is based on appraisals performed by REAS, a subsidiary
of the Bank. REAS is staffed by certified appraisers that also
perform appraisals for other companies. Factors, including the
assumptions and techniques utilized by the appraiser, are
considered by management. If the recorded investment in the
impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value of the collateral,
a valuation allowance is recorded as a component of the allowance
for loan losses. An allowance for each impaired loan that is not
collateral dependent is calculated based on the present value of
projected cash flows. If the recorded investment in the impaired
loan exceeds the present value of projected cash flows, a valuation
allowance is recorded as a component of the allowance for loan
losses. Impaired loans under $250,000 are not individually
evaluated for impairment with the exception of the Bank’s
troubled debt restructured (“TDR”) loans in the
residential mortgage loan portfolio, which are individually
evaluated for impairment. Accruing impaired loans were $24.3
million, $24.6 million and $22.4 million at June 30, 2018, December
31, 2017 and June 30, 2017, respectively. Interest income
recognized on accruing impaired loans was $697,000, $1.4 million,
and $740,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018, the year ended
December 31, 2017 and the six months ended June 30, 2017,
respectively. No interest income is recognized on non-accrual
impaired loans subsequent to their classification as
non-accrual.
17
The
following table presents impaired loans as of June 30,
2018:
June 30,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
Contractual Principal Balance
|
Recorded
Investment With No Allowance
|
Recorded
Investment With Allowance
|
Recorded
Investment in Impaired Loans
|
Related
Allowance
|
Real estate
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and
land development
|
$357
|
-
|
357
|
357
|
8
|
Single-family
residential
|
4,992
|
725
|
4,267
|
4,992
|
39
|
Single-family
residential -
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco de la Gente
stated income
|
16,213
|
-
|
16,213
|
16,213
|
1,082
|
Commercial
|
2,489
|
402
|
2,087
|
2,489
|
20
|
Multifamily and
farmland
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total impaired real
estate loans
|
24,051
|
1,127
|
22,924
|
24,051
|
1,149
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not secured
by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
96
|
94
|
2
|
96
|
-
|
Consumer
loans
|
133
|
-
|
133
|
133
|
2
|
Total impaired
loans
|
$24,280
|
1,221
|
23,059
|
24,280
|
1,151
|
The
following table presents the average impaired loan balance and the
interest income recognized by loan class for the three and six
months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017.
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three
months ended
|
Six
months ended
|
||||||
|
June 30,
2018
|
June 30,
2017
|
June 30,
2018
|
June 30,
2017
|
||||
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
Average
Balance
|
Interest
Income Recognized
|
Real estate
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and
land development
|
$373
|
5
|
304
|
2
|
341
|
11
|
265
|
6
|
Single-family
residential
|
6,306
|
66
|
4,595
|
63
|
6,325
|
135
|
5,185
|
131
|
Single-family
residential -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco de la Gente
stated income
|
14,841
|
230
|
17,539
|
232
|
14,981
|
467
|
17,271
|
469
|
Commercial
|
2,304
|
42
|
3,831
|
66
|
2,359
|
80
|
3,778
|
125
|
Multifamily and
farmland
|
-
|
-
|
45
|
-
|
4
|
-
|
56
|
-
|
Total impaired real
estate loans
|
23,824
|
343
|
26,314
|
363
|
24,010
|
693
|
26,555
|
731
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not secured
by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
98
|
-
|
129
|
3
|
100
|
-
|
95
|
3
|
Farm loans (non
RE)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Consumer
loans
|
141
|
2
|
221
|
3
|
146
|
4
|
215
|
6
|
Total impaired
loans
|
$24,063
|
345
|
26,664
|
369
|
24,256
|
697
|
26,865
|
740
|
18
The
following table presents impaired loans as of and for the year
ended December 31, 2017:
December 31,
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unpaid
Contractual Principal Balance
|
Recorded
Investment With No Allowance
|
Recorded
Investment With Allowance
|
Recorded
Investment in Impaired Loans
|
Related
Allowance
|
Average
Outstanding Impaired Loans
|
YTD
Interest Income Recognized
|
Real estate
loans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Construction and
land development
|
$282
|
-
|
277
|
277
|
6
|
253
|
17
|
Single-family
residential
|
5,226
|
1,135
|
3,686
|
4,821
|
41
|
5,113
|
265
|
Single-family
residential -
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Banco de la Gente
stated income
|
17,360
|
-
|
16,805
|
16,805
|
1,149
|
16,867
|
920
|
Commercial
|
2,761
|
807
|
1,661
|
2,468
|
1
|
3,411
|
148
|
Multifamily and
farmland
|
78
|
-
|
12
|
12
|
-
|
28
|
-
|
Total impaired real
estate loans
|
25,707
|
1,942
|
22,441
|
24,383
|
1,197
|
25,672
|
1,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans not secured
by real estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
loans
|
264
|
100
|
4
|
104
|
-
|
149
|
3
|
Consumer
loans
|
158
|
-
|
154
|
154
|
2
|
194
|
9
|
Total impaired
loans
|
$26,129
|
2,042
|
22,599
|
24,641
|
1,199
|
26,015
|
1,362
|
19
Changes
in the allowance for loan losses for the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018 and 2017 were as follows:
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Construction and Land Development
|
Single-Family Residential
|
Single-Family
Residential - Banco de la Gente Stated Income
|
Commercial
|
Multifamily and Farmland
|
Commercial
|
Farm
|
Consumer and All Other
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
Six months
ended June 30, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$804
|
1,812
|
1,280
|
1,193
|
72
|
574
|
-
|
155
|
476
|
6,366
|
Charge-offs
|
-
|
(43)
|
-
|
(271)
|
(5)
|
(2)
|
-
|
(186)
|
-
|
(507)
|
Recoveries
|
3
|
27
|
-
|
7
|
1
|
16
|
-
|
102
|
-
|
156
|
Provision
|
(139)
|
(158)
|
(47)
|
491
|
4
|
(1)
|
-
|
79
|
33
|
262
|
Ending
balance
|
$668
|
1,638
|
1,233
|
1,420
|
72
|
587
|
-
|
150
|
509
|
6,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$651
|
1,640
|
1,265
|
1,298
|
73
|
706
|
-
|
136
|
604
|
6,373
|
Charge-offs
|
-
|
(43)
|
-
|
(271)
|
-
|
(2)
|
-
|
(85)
|
-
|
(401)
|
Recoveries
|
1
|
22
|
-
|
4
|
-
|
8
|
-
|
39
|
-
|
74
|
Provision
|
16
|
19
|
(32)
|
389
|
(1)
|
(125)
|
-
|
60
|
(95)
|
231
|
Ending
balance
|
$668
|
1,638
|
1,233
|
1,420
|
72
|
587
|
-
|
150
|
509
|
6,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses at June 30, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
balance: individually
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated
for impairment
|
$-
|
2
|
1,066
|
18
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,086
|
Ending
balance: collectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated
for impairment
|
668
|
1,636
|
167
|
1,402
|
72
|
587
|
-
|
150
|
509
|
5,191
|
Ending
balance
|
$668
|
1,638
|
1,233
|
1,420
|
72
|
587
|
-
|
150
|
509
|
6,277
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at
June 30, 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
balance
|
$79,769
|
250,620
|
35,847
|
269,792
|
28,667
|
93,580
|
1,023
|
22,586
|
-
|
781,884
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
balance: individually
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated
for impairment
|
$95
|
2,132
|
14,975
|
2,103
|
-
|
94
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
19,399
|
Ending
balance: collectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated
for impairment
|
$79,674
|
248,488
|
20,872
|
267,689
|
28,667
|
93,486
|
1,023
|
22,586
|
-
|
762,485
|
20
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Construction and Land Development
|
Single-Family Residential
|
Single-Family
Residential - Banco de la Gente Stated Income
|
Commercial
|
Multifamily and Farmland
|
Commercial
|
Farm
|
Consumer and All Other
|
Unallocated
|
Total
|
Six months
ended June 30, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$1,152
|
2,126
|
1,377
|
1,593
|
52
|
675
|
-
|
204
|
371
|
7,550
|
Charge-offs
|
-
|
(44)
|
-
|
(66)
|
-
|
(37)
|
-
|
(182)
|
-
|
(329)
|
Recoveries
|
10
|
16
|
-
|
14
|
-
|
15
|
-
|
78
|
-
|
133
|
Provision
|
21
|
(279)
|
(84)
|
(78)
|
23
|
51
|
-
|
58
|
101
|
(187)
|
Ending
balance
|
$1,183
|
1,819
|
1,293
|
1,463
|
75
|
704
|
-
|
158
|
472
|
7,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three months
ended June 30, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning
balance
|
$969
|
2,003
|
1,328
|
1,655
|
73
|
628
|
-
|
178
|
429
|
7,263
|
Charge-offs
|
-
|
(24)
|
-
|
-
|
(66)
|
(35)
|
-
|
(73)
|
-
|
(198)
|
Recoveries
|
3
|
9
|
-
|
6
|
-
|
7
|
-
|
28
|
-
|
53
|
Provision
|
211
|
(169)
|
(35)
|
(198)
|
68
|
104
|
-
|
25
|
43
|
49
|
Ending
balance
|
$1,183
|
1,819
|
1,293
|
1,463
|
75
|
704
|
-
|
158
|
472
|
7,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance
for loan losses at June 30, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
balance: individually
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated
for impairment
|
$-
|
-
|
1,103
|
65
|
-
|
27
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
1,195
|
Ending
balance: collectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated
for impairment
|
1,183
|
1,819
|
190
|
1,398
|
75
|
677
|
-
|
158
|
472
|
5,972
|
Ending
balance
|
$1,183
|
1,819
|
1,293
|
1,463
|
75
|
704
|
-
|
158
|
472
|
7,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans at
June 30, 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
balance
|
$71,213
|
240,993
|
38,875
|
243,957
|
30,125
|
94,567
|
1,591
|
23,717
|
-
|
745,038
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending
balance: individually
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated
for impairment
|
$-
|
1,152
|
16,792
|
3,724
|
-
|
230
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
21,898
|
Ending
balance: collectively
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
evaluated
for impairment
|
$71,213
|
239,841
|
22,083
|
240,233
|
30,125
|
94,337
|
1,591
|
23,717
|
-
|
723,140
|
The
provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2018
was an expense of $231,000, as compared to an expense of $49,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in the
provision for loan losses is primarily attributable to a $36.9
million increase in loans from June 30, 2017 to June 30,
2018.
The
provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2018
was an expense of $262,000, as compared to a credit of $187,000 for
the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in the provision
for loan losses is primarily attributable to a $36.9 million
increase in loans from June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018.
The
Company utilizes an internal risk grading matrix to assign a risk
grade to each of its loans. Loans are graded on a scale of 1 to 8.
These risk grades are evaluated on an ongoing basis. A description
of the general characteristics of the eight risk grades is as
follows:
●
Risk Grade 1
– Excellent Quality: Loans are well above average quality and
a minimal amount of credit risk exists. Certificates of deposit or
cash secured loans or properly margined actively traded stock or
bond secured loans would fall in this grade.
●
Risk Grade 2
– High Quality: Loans are of good quality with risk levels
well within the Company’s range of acceptability. The
organization or individual is established with a history of
successful performance though somewhat susceptible to economic
changes.
●
Risk Grade 3
– Good Quality: Loans of average quality with risk levels
within the Company’s range of acceptability but higher than
normal. This may be a new organization or an existing organization
in a transitional phase (e.g. expansion, acquisition, market
change).
●
Risk Grade 4
– Management Attention: These loans have higher risk and
servicing needs but still are acceptable. Evidence of marginal
performance or deteriorating trends is observed. These are not
problem credits presently, but may be in the future if the borrower
is unable to change its present course.
●
Risk Grade 5
– Watch: These loans are currently performing satisfactorily,
but there has been some recent past due history on repayment and
there are potential weaknesses that may, if not corrected, weaken
the asset or inadequately protect the Company’s position at
some future date.
●
Risk Grade 6
– Substandard: A Substandard loan is inadequately protected
by the current sound net worth and paying capacity of the obligor
or the collateral pledged (if there is any). There is a
well-defined weakness or weaknesses that jeopardize the liquidation
of the debt. There is a distinct possibility that the Company will
sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not
corrected.
21
●
Risk Grade 7
– Doubtful: Loans classified as Doubtful have all the
weaknesses inherent in loans classified as Substandard, plus the
added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or
liquidation in full on the basis of currently existing facts,
conditions, and values highly questionable and improbable. Doubtful
is a temporary grade where a loss is expected but is presently not
quantified with any degree of accuracy. Once the loss position is
determined, the amount is charged off.
●
Risk Grade 8
– Loss: Loans classified as Loss
are considered uncollectable and of such little value that their
continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. This
classification does not mean that the asset has absolutely no
recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not practical or
desirable to defer writing off this worthless loan even though
partial recovery may be realized in the future. Loss is a temporary
grade until the appropriate authority is obtained to charge the
loan off.
The
following tables present the credit risk profile of each loan type
based on internally assigned risk grades as of June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017:
June 30,
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate
Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Construction
and Land Development
|
Single-Family
Residential
|
Single-Family
Residential - Banco de la Gente Stated Income
|
Commercial
|
Multifamily
and Farmland
|
Commercial
|
Farm
|
Consumer
|
All
Other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1- Excellent
Quality
|
$472
|
7,134
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
574
|
-
|
576
|
-
|
8,756
|
2- High
Quality
|
20,688
|
125,870
|
-
|
29,624
|
477
|
23,450
|
-
|
3,305
|
2,259
|
205,673
|
3- Good
Quality
|
49,044
|
91,359
|
14,373
|
218,439
|
25,325
|
61,998
|
870
|
4,909
|
10,128
|
476,445
|
4- Management
Attention
|
4,411
|
18,816
|
14,727
|
17,868
|
1,750
|
7,168
|
153
|
590
|
777
|
66,260
|
5-
Watch
|
4,884
|
3,996
|
3,112
|
3,093
|
1,115
|
283
|
-
|
20
|
-
|
16,503
|
6-
Substandard
|
270
|
3,445
|
3,635
|
768
|
-
|
107
|
-
|
22
|
-
|
8,247
|
7-
Doubtful
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8-
Loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$79,769
|
250,620
|
35,847
|
269,792
|
28,667
|
93,580
|
1,023
|
9,422
|
13,164
|
781,884
|
December
31, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(Dollars
in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Real Estate Loans
|
|
|
|
|
|
||||
|
Construction and Land Development
|
Single-Family Residential
|
Single-Family Residential - Banco de la Gente Stated
Income
|
Commercial
|
Multifamily and Farmland
|
Commercial
|
Farm
|
Consumer
|
All Other
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1-
Excellent Quality
|
$152
|
8,590
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
446
|
-
|
791
|
-
|
9,979
|
2-
High Quality
|
20,593
|
120,331
|
-
|
34,360
|
561
|
17,559
|
-
|
3,475
|
2,410
|
199,289
|
3-
Good Quality
|
53,586
|
89,120
|
14,955
|
196,439
|
25,306
|
65,626
|
1,085
|
5,012
|
9,925
|
461,054
|
4-
Management Attention
|
4,313
|
20,648
|
15,113
|
13,727
|
1,912
|
5,051
|
119
|
562
|
802
|
62,247
|
5-
Watch
|
6,060
|
4,796
|
3,357
|
3,671
|
1,146
|
223
|
-
|
23
|
-
|
19,276
|
6-
Substandard
|
283
|
3,218
|
3,824
|
440
|
12
|
117
|
-
|
25
|
-
|
7,919
|
7-
Doubtful
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
8-
Loss
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total
|
$84,987
|
246,703
|
37,249
|
248,637
|
28,937
|
89,022
|
1,204
|
9,888
|
13,137
|
759,764
|
Current
year TDR modifications, past due TDR loans and non-accrual TDR
loans totaled $1.8 million and $4.5 million at June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017, respectively. The terms of these loans have been
renegotiated to provide a concession to original terms, including a
reduction in principal or interest as a result of the deteriorating
financial position of the borrower. There was $33,000 and $21,000
in performing loans classified as TDR loans at June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017, respectively.
22
The
following table presents an analysis of TDR loan modifications
during the three and six months ended June 30, 2018.
Three and six
months ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Contracts
|
Pre-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
Post-Modification
Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
Real estate
loans
|
|
|
|
Single-family
residential
|
1
|
$33
|
33
|
Total real estate
TDR loans
|
1
|
33
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
Total TDR
loans
|
1
|
$33
|
33
|
During
the three and six months ended June 30, 2018, one loan was modified
that was considered to be a new TDR loan. The interest rate was
modified on this TDR loan.
There
were no new TDR modifications during the three and six months ended
June 30, 2017.
There
were no loans modified as TDR that defaulted during the three and
six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, which were within 12
months of their modification date. Generally, a TDR loan is
considered to be in default once it becomes 90 days or more past
due following a modification.
(4)
Net Earnings Per Share
Net
earnings per share is based on the weighted average number of
shares outstanding during the period while the effects of potential
shares outstanding during the period are included in diluted
earnings per share. The average market price during the year is
used to compute equivalent shares.
The
reconciliation of the amounts used in the computation of both
“basic earnings per share” and “diluted earnings
per share” for the three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and 2017 is as follows:
For the three
months ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Earnings (Dollars in thousands)
|
Weighted
Average Number of Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
Basic earnings per
share
|
$3,176
|
5,995,256
|
$0.53
|
Effect of dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
units
|
-
|
18,917
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share
|
$3,176
|
6,014,173
|
$0.53
|
For the six months
ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Earnings (Dollars in thousands)
|
Weighted
Average Number of Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
Basic earnings per
share
|
$6,479
|
5,995,256
|
$1.08
|
Effect of dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
units
|
-
|
17,964
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share
|
$6,479
|
6,013,220
|
$1.08
|
23
For the three
months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Earnings (Dollars in thousands)
|
Weighted
Average Number of Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
Basic earnings per
share
|
$2,811
|
5,989,414
|
$0.47
|
Effect of dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
units
|
-
|
95,171
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share
|
$2,811
|
6,084,585
|
$0.47
|
For the six months
ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
Net
Earnings (Dollars in thousands)
|
Weighted
Average Number of Shares
|
Per
Share Amount
|
Basic earnings per
share
|
$5,016
|
5,979,764
|
$0.84
|
Effect of dilutive
securities:
|
|
|
|
Restricted stock
units
|
-
|
93,664
|
|
Diluted earnings
per share
|
$5,016
|
6,073,428
|
$0.83
|
In
November 2017, the Board of Directors of the Company declared a 10%
stock dividend. As a result of the stock dividend, each shareholder
received one new share of stock for every ten shares of stock they
held as of the record date of December 4, 2017. The payable date
for the stock dividend was December 15, 2017. All previously
reported per share amounts have been restated to reflect this stock
dividend.
(5)
Stock-Based Compensation
The
Company has an Omnibus Stock Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan
that was approved by shareholders on May 7, 2009 (the
“Plan”) whereby certain stock-based rights, such as
stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units,
performance units, stock appreciation rights or book value shares,
may be granted to eligible directors and employees. A total of
280,933 shares are currently reserved for possible issuance under
the Plan. All stock-based rights under the Plan must be granted or
awarded by May 7, 2019 (i.e., ten years from the Plan effective
date).
The
Company granted 32,465 restricted stock units under the Plan at a
grant date fair value of $7.18 per share during the first quarter
of 2012, of which 5,891 restricted stock units were forfeited by
the executive officers of the Company as required by the agreement
with the U.S. Department of the Treasury in conjunction with the
Company’s participation in the Capital Purchase Program under
the Troubled Asset Relief Program. In July 2012, the Company
granted 5,891 restricted stock units at a grant date fair value of
$7.50 per share. The Company granted 29,475 restricted stock units
under the Plan at a grant date fair value of $10.82 per share
during the second quarter of 2013. The Company granted 23,162
restricted stock units under the Plan at a grant date fair value of
$14.27 per share during the first quarter of 2014. The Company
granted 16,583 restricted stock units under the Plan at a grant
date fair value of $16.34 per share during the first quarter of
2015. The Company granted 5,544 restricted stock units under the
Plan at a grant date fair value of $16.91 per share during the
first quarter of 2016. The Company granted 4,114 restricted stock
units under the Plan at a grant date fair value of $25.00 per share
during the first quarter of 2017. The Company granted 3,725
restricted stock units under the Plan at a grant date fair value of
$31.43 per share during the first quarter of 2018. The number of
restricted stock units granted and grant date fair values have been
restated to reflect the 10% stock dividend during the fourth
quarter of 2017. The Company recognizes compensation expense on the
restricted stock units over the period of time the restrictions are
in place (five years from the grant date for the 2012 grants, four
years from the grant date for the 2013, 2015, 2016, 2017 and 2018
grants and three years from the grant date for the 2014 grants).
The amount of expense recorded each period reflects the changes in
the Company’s stock price during such period. As of June 30,
2018, the total unrecognized compensation expense related to the
restricted stock unit grants under the Plan was
$334,000.
The
Company recognized compensation expense for restricted stock unit
awards granted under the Plan of $139,000 and $471,000 for the six
months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
24
(6)
Fair Value
The
Company is required to disclose fair value information about
financial instruments, whether or not recognized on the face of the
balance sheet, for which it is practicable to estimate that value.
The assumptions used in the estimation of the fair value of the
Company’s financial instruments are detailed below. Where
quoted prices are not available, fair values are based on estimates
using discounted cash flows and other valuation techniques. The use
of discounted cash flows can be significantly affected by the
assumptions used, including the discount rate and estimates of
future cash flows. The following disclosures should not be
considered a surrogate of the liquidation value of the Company, but
rather a good faith estimate of the increase or decrease in the
value of financial instruments held by the Company since purchase,
origination or issuance. The methods of determining the fair value
of assets and liabilities presented in this note are consistent
with methodologies disclosed in Note 15 of the Company’s 2017
Form 10-K, except for the valuation of loans which was impacted by
the adoption of ASU No. 2016-01.
The
Company groups assets and liabilities at fair value in three
levels, based on the markets in which the assets and liabilities
are traded and the reliability of the assumptions used to determine
fair value. These levels are:
●
Level 1 –
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for identical instruments
traded in active markets.
●
Level 2 –
Valuation is based upon quoted prices for similar instruments in
active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar instruments
in markets that are not active, and model-based valuation
techniques for which all significant assumptions are observable in
the market.
●
Level 3 –
Valuation is generated from model-based techniques that use at
least one significant assumption not observable in the market.
These unobservable assumptions reflect estimates of assumptions
that market participants would use in pricing the asset or
liability. Valuation techniques include use of option pricing
models, discounted cash flow models and similar
techniques.
Cash and Cash Equivalents
For
cash, due from banks and interest-bearing deposits, the carrying
amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value. Cash and cash
equivalents are reported in the Level 1 fair value
category.
Investment Securities Available for Sale
Fair
values of investment securities available for sale are determined
by obtaining quoted prices on nationally recognized securities
exchanges when available. If quoted prices are not available, fair
value is determined using matrix pricing, which is a mathematical
technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities
without relying exclusively on quoted prices for the specific
securities but rather by relying on the securities’
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities. Fair values for
investment securities with quoted market prices are reported in the
Level 1 fair value category. Fair value measurements obtained from
independent pricing services are reported in the Level 2 fair value
category. All other fair value measurements are reported in the
Level 3 fair value category.
Other Investments
For
other investments, the carrying value is a reasonable estimate of
fair value. Other investments are reported in the Level 3 fair
value category.
Mortgage Loans Held for Sale
Mortgage loans held
for sale are carried at the lower of aggregate cost or market
value. The cost of mortgage loans held for sale approximates the
market value. Mortgage loans held for sale are reported in the
Level 3 fair value category.
Loans
In
accordance with ASU No. 2016-01, the fair value of loans, excluding
previously presented impaired loans measured at fair value on a
non-recurring basis, is estimated using discounted cash flow
analyses. The discount rates used to determine fair value use
interest rate spreads that reflect factors such as liquidity,
credit, and nonperformance risk of the loans. Loans are reported in
the Level 3 fair value category, as the pricing of loans is more
subjective than the pricing of other financial
instruments.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance
For
cash surrender value of life insurance, the carrying value is a
reasonable estimate of fair value. Cash surrender value of life
insurance is reported in the Level 2 fair value
category.
25
Other Real Estate
The
fair value of other real estate is based upon independent market
prices, appraised values of the collateral or management’s
estimation of the value of the collateral. Other real estate is
reported in the Level 3 fair value category.
Deposits
The
fair value of demand deposits, interest-bearing demand deposits and
savings is the amount payable on demand at the reporting date. The
fair value of certificates of deposit is estimated by discounting
the future cash flows using the rates currently offered for
deposits of similar remaining maturities. Deposits are reported in
the Level 2 fair value category.
Securities Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
For
securities sold under agreements to repurchase, the carrying value
is a reasonable estimate of fair value. Securities sold under
agreements to repurchase are reported in the Level 2 fair value
category.
Federal Home Loan Bank (“FHLB”) Borrowings
The
fair value of FHLB borrowings is estimated based upon discounted
future cash flows using a discount rate comparable to the current
market rate for such borrowings. FHLB borrowings are reported in
the Level 2 fair value category.
Junior Subordinated Debentures
Because
the Company’s junior subordinated debentures were issued at a
floating rate, the carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair
value. Junior subordinated debentures are reported in the Level 2
fair value category.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of
Credit
Commitments to
extend credit and standby letters of credit are generally
short-term and at variable interest rates. Therefore, both the
carrying value and estimated fair value associated with these
instruments are immaterial.
Limitations
Fair
value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on
relevant market information and information about the financial
instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount
that could result from offering for sale at one time the
Company’s entire holdings of a particular financial
instrument. Because no market exists for a significant portion of
the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are
based on many judgments. These estimates are subjective in nature
and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and
therefore cannot be determined with precision. Changes in
assumptions could significantly affect the estimates.
Fair
value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance sheet
financial instruments without attempting to estimate the value of
anticipated future business and the value of assets and liabilities
that are not considered financial instruments. Significant assets
and liabilities that are not considered financial instruments
include deferred income taxes and premises and equipment. In
addition, the tax ramifications related to the realization of
unrealized gains and losses can have a significant effect on fair
value estimates and have not been considered in the
estimates.
26
The
table below presents the balance of securities available for sale,
which are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level
within the fair value hierarchy, as of June 30, 2018 and December
31, 2017.
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30,
2018
|
|||
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
Level 1
Valuation
|
Level 2
Valuation
|
Level 3
Valuation
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$45,721
|
-
|
45,721
|
-
|
U.S.
Government
|
|
|
|
|
sponsored
enterprises
|
$37,537
|
-
|
37,537
|
-
|
State and political
subdivisions
|
$125,535
|
-
|
125,535
|
-
|
Corporate
bonds
|
$1,012
|
-
|
1,012
|
-
|
Trust preferred
securities
|
$250
|
-
|
-
|
250
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31,
2017
|
|||
|
Fair Value
Measurements
|
Level 1
Valuation
|
Level 2
Valuation
|
Level 3
Valuation
|
Mortgage-backed
securities
|
$53,609
|
-
|
53,609
|
-
|
U.S.
Government
|
|
|
|
|
sponsored
enterprises
|
$40,380
|
-
|
40,380
|
-
|
State and political
subdivisions
|
$133,570
|
-
|
133,570
|
-
|
Corporate
bonds
|
$1,512
|
-
|
1,512
|
-
|
Trust preferred
securities
|
$250
|
-
|
-
|
250
|
The
following is an analysis of fair value measurements of investment
securities available for sale using Level 3, significant
unobservable inputs, for the six months ended June 30,
2018.
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
Investment
Securities Available for Sale
|
|
Level 3
Valuation
|
Balance, beginning
of period
|
$250
|
Change in book
value
|
-
|
Change in
gain/(loss) realized and unrealized
|
-
|
Purchases/(sales
and calls)
|
-
|
Transfers in and/or
(out) of Level 3
|
-
|
Balance, end of
period
|
$250
|
|
|
Change in
unrealized gain/(loss) for assets still held in Level
3
|
$-
|
The
fair value measurements for mortgage loans held for sale, impaired
loans and other real estate on a non-recurring basis at June 30,
2018 and December 31, 2017 are presented below. The fair value
measurement process uses certified appraisals and other
market-based information; however, in many cases, it also requires
significant input based on management’s knowledge of, and
judgment about, current market conditions, specific issues relating
to the collateral and other matters. As a result, all fair value
measurements for impaired loans and other real estate are
considered Level 3.
27
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements
June
30,
2018
|
Level 1
Valuation
|
Level 2
Valuation
|
Level 3
Valuation
|
Mortgage loans held
for sale
|
$671
|
-
|
-
|
671
|
Impaired
loans
|
$23,129
|
-
|
-
|
23,129
|
Other real
estate
|
$90
|
-
|
-
|
90
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements December 31,
2017
|
Level 1
Valuation
|
Level 2
Valuation
|
Level 3
Valuation
|
Mortgage loans held
for sale
|
$857
|
-
|
-
|
857
|
Impaired
loans
|
$23,442
|
-
|
-
|
23,442
|
Other real
estate
|
$118
|
-
|
-
|
118
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value
June
30,
2018
|
Fair
Value
December
31,
2017
|
Valuation
Technique
|
Significant
Unobservable Inputs
|
General Range
of Significant Unobservable Input Values
|
Mortgage loans held
for sale
|
$671
|
857
|
Rate lock
commitment
|
N/A
|
N/A
|
Impaired
loans
|
$23,129
|
23,442
|
Appraised
value and discounted cash flows
|
Discounts to reflect
current market conditions and ultimate collectability
|
0 - 25%
|
Other real
estate
|
$90
|
118
|
Appraised
value
|
Discounts to reflect
current market conditions and estimated costs to sell
|
0 - 25%
|
The
carrying amount and estimated fair value of financial instruments
at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are as follows:
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements at June 30, 2018
|
|||
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$69,555
|
69,555
|
-
|
-
|
69,555
|
Investment
securities available for sale
|
$210,055
|
-
|
209,805
|
250
|
210,055
|
Other
investments
|
$4,427
|
-
|
-
|
4,427
|
4,427
|
Mortgage loans held
for sale
|
$671
|
-
|
-
|
671
|
671
|
Loans,
net
|
$775,607
|
-
|
-
|
769,227
|
769,227
|
Cash surrender
value of life insurance
|
$15,743
|
-
|
15,743
|
-
|
15,743
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
$915,012
|
-
|
-
|
895,453
|
895,453
|
Securities sold
under agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
repurchase
|
$46,570
|
-
|
46,570
|
-
|
46,570
|
Junior subordinated
debentures
|
$20,619
|
-
|
20,619
|
-
|
20,619
|
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
Measurements at December 31, 2017
|
|||
|
Carrying
Amount
|
Level
1
|
Level
2
|
Level
3
|
Total
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
$57,304
|
57,304
|
-
|
-
|
57,304
|
Investment
securities available for sale
|
$229,321
|
-
|
229,071
|
250
|
229,321
|
Other
investments
|
$1,830
|
-
|
-
|
1,830
|
1,830
|
Mortgage loans held
for sale
|
$857
|
-
|
-
|
857
|
857
|
Loans,
net
|
$753,398
|
-
|
-
|
735,837
|
735,837
|
Cash surrender
value of life insurance
|
$15,552
|
-
|
15,552
|
-
|
15,552
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
$906,952
|
-
|
-
|
894,932
|
894,932
|
Securities sold
under agreements
|
|
|
|
|
|
to
repurchase
|
$37,757
|
-
|
37,757
|
-
|
37,757
|
Junior subordinated
debentures
|
$20,619
|
-
|
20,619
|
-
|
20,619
|
(7)
Subsequent Events
The
Company has reviewed and evaluated subsequent events and
transactions for material subsequent events through the date the
financial statements are issued. Management has concluded that
there were no material subsequent events.
28
Item
2. Management's Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
The following is a discussion of our financial position and results
of operations of the Company and should be read in conjunction with
the information set forth under Item 1A Risk Factors and the
Company’s Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes thereto
on pages A-24 through A-66 of the Company’s 2017 Annual
Report to Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement
for the May 3, 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Introduction
Management’s
discussion and analysis of earnings and related data are presented
to assist in understanding the consolidated financial condition and
results of operations of the Company. The Company is the parent
company of the Bank and a registered bank holding company operating
under the supervision of the Board of Governors of the Federal
Reserve System (the “Federal Reserve”). The Bank is a
North Carolina-chartered bank, with offices in Catawba, Lincoln,
Alexander, Mecklenburg, Iredell, Wake and Durham counties,
operating under the banking laws of North Carolina and the rules
and regulations of the Federal Deposit Insurance
Corporation.
Overview
Our
business consists principally of attracting deposits from the
general public and investing these funds in commercial loans, real
estate mortgage loans, real estate construction loans and consumer
loans. Our profitability depends primarily on our net interest
income, which is the difference between the income we receive on
our loan and investment securities portfolios and our cost of
funds, which consists of interest paid on deposits and borrowed
funds. Net interest income also is affected by the relative amounts
of our interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities.
When interest-earning assets approximate or exceed interest-bearing
liabilities, a positive interest rate spread will generate net
interest income. Our profitability is also affected by the level of
other income and operating expenses. Other income consists
primarily of miscellaneous fees related to our loans and deposits,
mortgage banking income and commissions from sales of annuities and
mutual funds. Operating expenses consist of compensation and
benefits, occupancy related expenses, federal deposit and other
insurance premiums, data processing, advertising and other
expenses.
Our
operations are influenced significantly by local economic
conditions and by policies of financial institution regulatory
authorities. The earnings on our assets are influenced by the
effects of, and changes in, trade, monetary and fiscal policies and
laws, including interest rate policies of the Federal Reserve,
inflation, interest rates, market and monetary fluctuations.
Lending activities are affected by the demand for commercial and
other types of loans, which in turn is affected by the interest
rates at which such financing may be offered. Our cost of funds is
influenced by interest rates on competing investments and by rates
offered on similar investments by competing financial institutions
in our market area, as well as general market interest rates. These
factors can cause fluctuations in our net interest income and other
income. In addition, local economic conditions can impact the
credit risk of our loan portfolio, in that (1) local employers may
be required to eliminate employment positions of individual
borrowers, and (2) small businesses and commercial borrowers may
experience a downturn in their operating performance and become
unable to make timely payments on their loans. Management evaluates
these factors in estimating the allowance for loan losses and
changes in these economic factors could result in increases or
decreases to the provision for loan losses.
Current
economic conditions, while not as robust as those experienced in
the pre-crisis period from 2004 to 2007, have stabilized such that
businesses in our market area are growing and investing again. The
uncertainty expressed in the local, national and international
markets through the primary economic indicators of activity,
however, continues to limit the level of activity in our
markets.
Although we are
unable to control the external factors that influence our business,
by maintaining high levels of balance sheet liquidity, managing our
interest rate exposures and by actively monitoring asset quality,
we seek to minimize the potentially adverse risks of unforeseen and
unfavorable economic trends.
Our
business emphasis has been and continues to be to operate as a
well-capitalized, profitable and independent community-oriented
financial institution dedicated to providing quality customer
service. We are committed to meeting the financial needs of the
communities in which we operate. We expect growth to be achieved in
our local markets and through expansion opportunities in contiguous
or nearby markets. While we would be willing to consider growth by
acquisition in certain circumstances, we do not consider the
acquisition of another company to be necessary for our continued
ability to provide a reasonable return to our shareholders. We
believe that we can be more effective in serving our customers than
many of our non-local competitors because of our ability to quickly
and effectively provide senior management responses to customer
needs and inquiries. Our ability to provide these services is
enhanced by the stability and experience of our Bank officers and
managers.
29
The
Federal Reserve maintained the Federal Funds rate at 0.25% from
December 2008 to December 2015 before increasing the Fed Funds rate
to 0.50% on December 16, 2015, 0.75% on December 14, 2016, 1.00% on
March 15, 2017, 1.25% on June 14, 2017, 1.50% on December 13, 2017,
1.75% on March 21, 2018 and 2.00% on June 13, 2018. These increases
had a positive impact on earnings in 2017 and should continue to
have a positive impact on the Bank’s net interest income in
future periods.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
The
Company’s accounting policies are fundamental to
understanding management’s discussion and analysis of results
of operations and financial condition. Many of the Company’s
accounting policies require significant judgment regarding
valuation of assets and liabilities and/or significant
interpretation of specific accounting guidance. A more complete
description of the Company’s significant accounting policies
can be found in Note 1 of the Notes to Consolidated Financial
Statements in the Company’s 2017 Annual Report to
Shareholders which is Appendix A to the Proxy Statement for the May
3, 2018 Annual Meeting of Shareholders.
Many of
the Company’s assets and liabilities are recorded using
various techniques that require significant judgment as to
recoverability. The collectibility of loans is reflected through
the Company’s estimate of the allowance for loan losses. The
Company performs periodic and systematic detailed reviews of its
lending portfolio to assess overall collectibility. In addition,
certain assets and liabilities are reflected at their estimated
fair value in the consolidated financial statements. Such amounts
are based on either quoted market prices or estimated values
derived from dealer quotes used by the Company, market comparisons
or internally generated modeling techniques. The Company’s
internal models generally involve present value of cash flow
techniques. The various techniques are discussed in greater detail
elsewhere in this management’s discussion and analysis and
the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. Fair value of
the Company’s financial instruments is discussed in Note (6)
of the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements (Unaudited)
included in this Quarterly Report.
Results of Operations
Summary. Net earnings were $3.2 million
or $0.53 basic and diluted net earnings per share for the three
months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to $2.8 million or $0.47
basic and diluted net earnings per share for the same period one
year ago. The increase in second quarter net earnings is
attributable to an increase in net interest income and an increase
in non-interest income, which were partially offset by an increase
in the provision for loan losses and an increase in non-interest
expense during the three months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2017, as discussed
below.
The
annualized return on average assets was 1.16% for the three months
ended June 30, 2018, as compared to 1.02% for the same period one
year ago, and annualized return on average shareholders’
equity was 10.86% for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to 10.04% for the same period one year ago.
Year-to-date net
earnings as of June 30, 2018 were $6.5 million or $1.08 basic and
diluted net earnings per share, as compared to $5.0 million or
$0.84 basic net earnings per share and $0.83 diluted net earnings
per share for the same period one year ago. The increase in
year-to-date net earnings is primarily attributable to an increase
in net interest income and an increase in non-interest income,
which were partially offset by an increase in the provision for
loan losses and an increase in non-interest expense, as discussed
below.
The
annualized return on average assets was 1.20% for the six months
ended June 30, 2018, as compared to 0.92% for the same period one
year ago, and annualized return on average shareholders’
equity was 11.02% for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to 9.05% for the same period one year ago.
Net Interest Income. Net interest
income, the major component of the Company’s net earnings,
was $10.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to $9.8 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017.
The increase in net interest income was primarily due to a $598,000
increase in interest income, which was primarily attributable to an
increase in the average outstanding balance of loans and a 0.75%
increase in the prime rate since June 30, 2017, combined with a
$109,000 decrease in interest expense, which was primarily
attributable to a decrease in the average outstanding balance of
FHLB borrowings during the three months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to the same period one year ago due to the payoff of
remaining FHLB borrowings in October 2017.
30
Interest income was
$11.1 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as compared
to $10.5 million for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The
increase in interest income was primarily due to an increase in
interest income on loans, which was partially offset by a decrease
in interest income on investment securities. During the quarter
ended June 30, 2018, average loans increased $25.1 million to
$768.4 million from $743.3 million for the quarter ended June 30,
2017. During the quarter ended June 30, 2018, average investment
securities available for sale decreased $25.9 million to $210.1
million from $236.0 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017.
The average yield on loans for the quarters ended June 30, 2018 and
2017 was 4.90% and 4.69%, respectively. The average yield on
investment securities available for sale was 3.40% and 3.80% for
the quarters ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The
average yield on earning assets was 4.50% and 4.41% for the
quarters ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Interest
expense was $513,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to $622,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The
decrease in interest expense was the result of lower cost of funds
and reductions in FHLB borrowings and certificates of deposit. The
average rate paid on interest-bearing checking and savings accounts
was 0.15% and 0.12% for the three months ended June 30, 2018 and
2017, respectively. The average rate paid on certificates of
deposit was 0.39% for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to 0.36% for the same period one year ago. The average
rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 0.31% for the three
months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to 0.35% for the same
period one year ago. During the quarter ended June 30, 2018,
average certificates of deposit decreased $21.7 million to $113.8
million from $135.5 million for the quarter ended June 30, 2017.
Average FHLB borrowings decreased $20.0 million to zero for the
three months ended June 30, 2018 from $20.0 million for the three
months ended June 30, 2017.
The
following table sets forth for each category of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the average amounts
outstanding, the interest incurred on such amounts and the average
rate earned or incurred for the three months ended June 30, 2018
and 2017. The table also sets forth the average rate earned on
total interest-earning assets, the average rate paid on total
interest-bearing liabilities, and the net yield on total average
interest-earning assets for the same periods. Yield information
does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected as
a component of shareholders’ equity. Yields and interest
income on tax-exempt investments for the three months ended June
30, 2018 have been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis using an
effective tax rate of 22.98% for securities that are both federal
and state tax exempt and an effective tax rate of 20.48% for
federal tax exempt securities. Yields and interest income on
tax-exempt investments for the three months ended June 30, 2017
have been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis using an effective tax
rate of 35.98% for securities that are both federal and state tax
exempt and an effective tax rate of 32.98% for federal tax exempt
securities. Non-accrual loans and the interest income that was
recorded on non-accrual loans, if any, are included in the yield
calculations for loans in all periods reported.
31
|
Three months
ended
|
Three months
ended
|
||||
|
June 30,
2018
|
June 30,
2017
|
||||
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Average Balance
|
Interest
|
Yield / Rate
|
Average Balance
|
Interest
|
Yield / Rate
|
Interest-earning
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
receivable
|
$768,411
|
9,386
|
4.90%
|
$743,275
|
8,689
|
4.69%
|
Investments -
taxable
|
52,853
|
370
|
2.81%
|
66,063
|
425
|
2.58%
|
Investments -
nontaxable*
|
161,469
|
1,445
|
3.59%
|
173,277
|
1,846
|
4.27%
|
Other
|
27,482
|
124
|
1.81%
|
19,037
|
48
|
1.01%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-earning assets
|
1,010,215
|
11,325
|
4.50%
|
1,001,652
|
11,008
|
4.41%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from
banks
|
44,735
|
|
|
53,546
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
(6,350)
|
|
|
(7,256)
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
52,067
|
|
|
53,342
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$1,100,667
|
|
|
$1,101,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW, MMDA &
savings deposits
|
$489,363
|
186
|
0.15%
|
$481,374
|
143
|
0.12%
|
Time
deposits
|
113,790
|
110
|
0.39%
|
135,511
|
120
|
0.36%
|
FHLB
borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
20,000
|
201
|
4.03%
|
Trust preferred
securities
|
20,619
|
198
|
3.85%
|
20,619
|
145
|
2.82%
|
Other
|
43,782
|
19
|
0.18%
|
47,811
|
13
|
0.11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
667,554
|
513
|
0.31%
|
705,315
|
622
|
0.35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing liabilities and shareholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand
deposits
|
312,481
|
|
|
280,156
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
3,282
|
|
|
3,533
|
|
|
Shareholders'
equity
|
117,350
|
|
|
112,280
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
and shareholder's equity
|
$1,100,667
|
|
|
$1,101,284
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
spread
|
|
$10,812
|
4.19%
|
|
$10,385
|
4.06%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on
interest-earning assets
|
|
|
4.29%
|
|
|
4.16%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
securities
|
|
$266
|
|
|
$547
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
$10,546
|
|
|
$9,839
|
|
*Includes
U.S. Government agency securities that are non-taxable for state
income tax purposes of $38.6 million in 2018 and $39.6 million in
2017. Tax rates of 2.50% and 3.00% were used to calculate the tax
equivalent yield on these securities in 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
|
Year-to-date net
interest income as of June 30, 2018 was $20.8 million compared to
$19.3 million for the same period one year ago. The increase in net
interest income was primarily due to a $1.3 million increase in
interest income, which was primarily attributable to an increase in
the average outstanding balance of loans and a 0.75% increase in
the prime rate since June 2017, combined with a $240,000 decrease
in interest expense, which was primarily attributable to a decrease
in the average outstanding balances of FHLB borrowings during the
six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the same period one
year ago. Net interest income after the provision for loan losses
was $20.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared
to $19.5 million for the same period one year ago. The provision
for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was an
expense of $262,000, as compared to a credit of $187,000 for the
six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in the credit to the
provision for loan losses is primarily attributable to a $36.9
million increase in loans from June 30, 2017 to June 30,
2018.
32
Interest income was
$21.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, compared to
$20.5 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase
in interest income was primarily due to an increase in interest
income on loans, which was partially offset by a decrease in
interest income on investment securities. During the six months
ended June 30, 2018, average loans increased $30.6 million to
$767.0 million from $736.4 million for the six months ended June
30, 2017. During the
six months ended June 30, 2018, average investment securities
available for sale decreased $24.7 million to $213.7 million from
$238.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017. The average
yield on loans for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017 was
4.85% and 4.65%, respectively. The average yield on investment
securities available for sale was 3.44% and 3.78% for the six
months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The average
yield on earning assets was 4.49% and 4.38% for the six months
ended June 30, 2018 and 2017, respectively.
Interest
expense was $980,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
The decrease in interest expense was the result of lower cost of
funds and reductions in FHLB borrowings and certificates of
deposit. The average rate paid on interest-bearing checking and
savings accounts was 0.15% and 0.12% for the six months ended June
30, 2018 and 2017, respectively. The average rate paid on
certificates of deposit was 0.37% for the six months ended June 30,
2018, as compared to 0.36% for the same period one year ago. The
average rate paid on interest-bearing liabilities was 0.29% for the
six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to 0.35% for the same
period one year ago. During the quarter ended June 30, 2018,
average certificates of deposit decreased $21.0 million to $117.2
million from $138.2 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
Average FHLB borrowings decreased $20.0 million to zero for the six
months ended June 30, 2018 from $20.0 million for the six months
ended June 30, 2017 due to the payoff of remaining FHLB borrowings
in October 2017.
33
The
following table sets forth for each category of interest-earning
assets and interest-bearing liabilities, the average amounts
outstanding, the interest incurred on such amounts and the average
rate earned or incurred for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and
2017. The table also sets forth the average rate earned on total
interest-earning assets, the average rate paid on total
interest-bearing liabilities, and the net yield on total average
interest-earning assets for the same periods. Yield information
does not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected as
a component of shareholders’ equity. Yields and interest
income on tax-exempt investments for the six months ended June 30,
2018 have been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis using an
effective tax rate of 22.98% for securities that are both federal
and state tax exempt and an effective tax rate of 20.48% for
federal tax exempt securities. Yields and interest income on
tax-exempt investments for the six months ended June 30, 2017 have
been adjusted to a tax equivalent basis using an effective tax rate
of 35.98% for securities that are both federal and state tax exempt
and an effective tax rate of 32.98% for federal tax exempt
securities. Non-accrual loans and the interest income that was
recorded on non-accrual loans, if any, are included in the yield
calculations for loans in all periods reported.
|
Six months
ended
|
Six months
ended
|
||||
|
June 30,
2018
|
June 30,
2017
|
||||
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Average Balance
|
Interest
|
Yield / Rate
|
Average Balance
|
Interest
|
Yield / Rate
|
Interest-earning
assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans
receivable
|
$767,048
|
18,455
|
4.85%
|
$736,413
|
16,969
|
4.65%
|
Investments -
taxable
|
54,255
|
775
|
2.88%
|
67,855
|
863
|
2.56%
|
Investments -
nontaxable*
|
162,834
|
2,955
|
3.66%
|
173,829
|
3,714
|
4.31%
|
Other
|
20,116
|
169
|
1.69%
|
17,196
|
78
|
0.91%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-earning assets
|
1,004,253
|
22,354
|
4.49%
|
995,293
|
21,624
|
4.38%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
earning assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and due from
banks
|
40,327
|
|
|
53,841
|
|
|
Allowance for loan
losses
|
(6,359)
|
|
|
(7,440)
|
|
|
Other
assets
|
52,358
|
|
|
52,223
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
assets
|
$1,090,579
|
|
|
$1,093,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest-bearing
liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW, MMDA &
savings deposits
|
$490,616
|
362
|
0.15%
|
$481,170
|
275
|
0.12%
|
Time
deposits
|
117,162
|
215
|
0.37%
|
138,204
|
248
|
0.36%
|
FHLB
borrowings
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
20,000
|
393
|
3.96%
|
Trust preferred
securities
|
20,619
|
369
|
3.61%
|
20,619
|
280
|
2.74%
|
Other
|
41,663
|
34
|
0.16%
|
45,113
|
24
|
0.11%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
interest-bearing liabilities
|
670,060
|
980
|
0.29%
|
705,106
|
1,220
|
0.35%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-interest
bearing liabilities and shareholders' equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Demand
deposits
|
300,419
|
|
|
274,366
|
|
|
Other
liabilities
|
1,555
|
|
|
2,704
|
|
|
Shareholders'
equity
|
118,545
|
|
|
111,741
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
and shareholder's equity
|
$1,090,579
|
|
|
$1,093,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
spread
|
|
$21,374
|
4.19%
|
|
$20,404
|
4.04%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net yield on
interest-earning assets
|
|
|
4.29%
|
|
|
4.13%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Taxable equivalent
adjustment
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment
securities
|
|
$536
|
|
|
$1,099
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net interest
income
|
|
$20,838
|
|
|
$19,305
|
|
*Includes
U.S. Government agency securities that are non-taxable for state
income tax purposes of $39.2 million in 2018 and $38.9 million in
2017. Tax rates of 2.50% and 3.00% were used to calculate the tax
equivalent yield on these securities in 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
|
34
Changes
in interest income and interest expense can result from variances
in both volume and rates. The following table presents the impact
on the Company’s tax equivalent net interest income resulting
from changes in average balances and average rates for the periods
indicated. The changes in interest due to both volume and rate have
been allocated to volume and rate changes in proportion to the
relationship of the absolute dollar amounts of the changes in
each.
|
Three
months ended June 30, 2018 compared to three months ended June 30,
2017
|
Six
months ended June 30, 2018 compared to six months ended June 30,
2017
|
||||
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
Changes in average volume
|
Changes in average rates
|
Total Increase (Decrease)
|
Changes in average volume
|
Changes in average rates
|
Total Increase (Decrease)
|
Interest
income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans: Net of
unearned income
|
$300
|
398
|
698
|
722
|
764
|
1,486
|
Investments -
taxable
|
(89)
|
34
|
(55)
|
(184)
|
96
|
(88)
|
Investments -
nontaxable
|
(116)
|
(285)
|
(401)
|
(217)
|
(542)
|
(759)
|
Other
|
30
|
46
|
76
|
19
|
72
|
91
|
Total interest
income
|
125
|
193
|
318
|
340
|
390
|
730
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest
expense:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOW, MMDA &
savings deposits
|
3
|
39
|
42
|
6
|
81
|
87
|
Time
deposits
|
(20)
|
10
|
(10)
|
(38)
|
5
|
(33)
|
FHLB
borrowings
|
(101)
|
(100)
|
(201)
|
(197)
|
(196)
|
(393)
|
Trust preferred
securities
|
-
|
53
|
53
|
-
|
89
|
89
|
Other
|
(1)
|
8
|
7
|
(2)
|
12
|
10
|
Total interest
expense
|
(119)
|
10
|
(109)
|
(231)
|
(9)
|
(240)
|
Net interest
income
|
$244
|
183
|
427
|
571
|
399
|
970
|
Provision for Loan Losses. The
provision for loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2018
was an expense of $231,000, as compared to an expense of $49,000
for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in the
provision for loan losses is primarily attributable to a $36.9
million increase in loans from June 30, 2017 to June 30,
2018.
The
provision for loan losses for the six months ended June 30, 2018
was an expense of $262,000, as compared to a credit of $187,000 for
the six months ended June 30, 2017. The increase in the provision
for loan losses is primarily attributable to a $36.9 million
increase in loans from June 30, 2017 to June 30, 2018.
Non-Interest Income. Total non-interest
income was $4.0 million for the three months ended June 30, 2018,
as compared to $3.9 million for the three months ended June 30,
2017. The increase in non-interest income is primarily attributable
to a $100,000 increase in miscellaneous non-interest income and a
$50,000 increase in gain on sale of securities, which were
partially offset by a $79,000 decrease in mortgage banking income
during the three months ended June 30, 2018, compared to the same
period one year ago.
Non-interest income
was $7.8 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to $7.4 million for the six months ended June 30, 2017.
The increase in non-interest income is primarily attributable to a
$286,000 net decrease in losses on other real estate and a $232,000
increase in miscellaneous non-interest income, which were partially
offset by a $209,000 decrease in mortgage banking income during the
six months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2017. The increase in miscellaneous non-interest income is
primarily due to an increase in other investment income. The
decrease in mortgage banking income is primarily due to a decrease
in mortgage loan volume resulting from an increase in mortgage loan
rates.
Non-Interest Expense. Total
non-interest expense was $10.6 million for the three months ended
June 30, 2018, as compared to $10.0 million for the three months
ended June 30, 2017. The increase in non-interest expense was
primarily attributable to a $514,000 increase in salaries and
benefits expense, which was primarily due to an increase in the
number of full-time equivalent employees and annual salary
increases.
Non-interest
expense was $20.6 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018,
as compared to $20.3 million for the six months ended June 30,
2017. The increase in non-interest expense was primarily due to a
$242,000 increase in salaries and benefits expense, a $294,000
increase in occupancy expense and a $268,000 increase in
professional fees, which were partially offset by a $379,000
decrease in other non-interest expense, during the six months ended
June 30, 2018, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017.
The increase in salaries and benefits expense is primarily due to
an increase in the number of full-time equivalent employees and
annual salary increases. The increase in occupancy expense is
primarily due to an increase in depreciation expense during the six
months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to the six months ended
June 30, 2017. The increase in professional fees is primarily due
to an increase in consulting fees during the six months ended June
30, 2018, as compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017. The
decrease in other non-interest expense is primarily due to
decreases in debit card expense, fraud/forgery expense and internet
banking expense during the six months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to the six months ended June 30, 2017.
35
Income Taxes. Income tax expense was
$595,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as compared to
$925,000 for the three months ended June 30, 2017. The effective
tax rate was 16% for the three months ended June 30, 2018, as
compared to 25% for the three months ended June 30, 2017. Income
tax expense was $1.2 million for the six months ended June 30,
2018, as compared to $1.5 million for the six months ended June 30,
2017. The effective tax rate was 16% for the six months ended June
30, 2018, as compared to 23% for the six months ended June 30,
2017. The reduction in the effective tax rate is primarily due to
the passing of the TCJA in December, 2017, which reduced the
Company’s federal corporate tax rate from 34% to 21%
effective January 1, 2018.
Analysis of Financial Condition
Investment Securities. Available for
sale securities were $210.1 million at June 30, 2018, as compared
to $229.3 million at December 31, 2017. Average investment
securities available for sale for the six months ended June 30,
2018 were $213.7 million, as compared to $234.3 million for the
year ended December 31, 2017.
Loans. At June 30, 2018, loans were
$781.9 million, as compared to $759.8 million at December 31, 2017.
Average loans represented 76% and 74% of average earning assets for
the six months ended June 30, 2018 and the year ended December 31,
2017, respectively.
The
Company had $671,000 and $857,000 in mortgage loans held for sale
as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017,
respectively.
Although the
Company has a diversified loan portfolio, a substantial portion of
the loan portfolio is collateralized by real estate, which is
dependent upon the real estate market. Real estate mortgage loans
include both commercial and residential mortgage loans. At June 30,
2018, the Company had $105.3 million in residential mortgage loans,
$104.3 million in home equity loans and $370.6 million in
commercial mortgage loans, which include $296.4 million secured by
commercial property and $74.2 million secured by residential
property. Residential mortgage loans include $35.8 million in
stated income mortgage loans from the former Banco division of the
Bank. All residential mortgage loans are originated as fully
amortizing loans, with no negative amortization.
At June
30, 2018, the Company had $79.8 million in construction and land
development loans. The following table presents a breakout of these
loans.
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
Number of
Loans
|
Balance
Outstanding
|
Non-accrual
Balance
|
Land acquisition
and development - commercial purposes
|
42
|
$6,451
|
$-
|
Land acquisition
and development - residential purposes
|
200
|
20,908
|
123
|
1 to 4 family
residential construction
|
125
|
22,978
|
-
|
Commercial
construction
|
27
|
29,432
|
-
|
Total construction
and land development
|
394
|
$79,769
|
$123
|
Current
year TDR modifications, past due TDR loans and non-accrual TDR
loans totaled $1.8 million and $4.5 million at June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017, respectively. The terms of these loans have been
renegotiated to provide a concession to original terms, including a
reduction in principal or interest as a result of the deteriorating
financial position of the borrower. There was $33,000 and $21,000
in performing loans classified as TDR loans at June 30, 2017 and
December 31, 2017, respectively.
Allowance for Loan Losses. The
allowance for loan losses reflects management’s assessment
and estimate of the risks associated with extending credit and its
evaluation of the quality of the loan portfolio. The Bank
periodically analyzes the loan portfolio in an effort to review
asset quality and to establish an allowance for loan losses that
management believes will be adequate in light of anticipated risks
and loan losses. In assessing the adequacy of the allowance, size,
quality and risk of loans in the portfolio are reviewed. Other
factors considered are:
●
the Bank’s
loan loss experience;
●
the amount of past
due and non-performing loans;
●
specific known
risks;
●
the status and
amount of other past due and non-performing assets;
●
underlying
estimated values of collateral securing loans;
●
current and
anticipated economic conditions; and
●
other factors which
management believes affect the allowance for potential credit
losses.
36
Management uses
several measures to assess and monitor the credit risks in the loan
portfolio, including a loan grading system that begins upon loan
origination and continues until the loan is collected or
collectability becomes doubtful. Upon loan origination, the
Bank’s originating loan officer evaluates the quality of the
loan and assigns one of eight risk grades. The loan officer
monitors the loan’s performance and credit quality and makes
changes to the credit grade as conditions warrant. When originated
or renewed, all loans over a certain dollar amount receive in-depth
reviews and risk assessments by the Bank’s Credit
Administration. Before making any changes in these risk grades,
management considers assessments as determined by the third party
credit review firm (as described below), regulatory examiners and
the Bank’s Credit Administration. Any issues regarding the
risk assessments are addressed by the Bank’s senior credit
administrators and factored into management’s decision to
originate or renew the loan. The Bank’s Board of Directors
reviews, on a monthly basis, an analysis of the Bank’s
reserves relative to the range of reserves estimated by the
Bank’s Credit Administration.
As an
additional measure, the Bank engages an independent third party to
review the underwriting, documentation and risk grading analyses.
This independent third party reviews and evaluates loan
relationships greater than $1.0 million, excluding loans in
default, and loans in process of litigation or liquidation. The
third party’s evaluation and report is shared with management
and the Bank’s Board of Directors.
Management
considers certain commercial loans with weak credit risk grades to
be individually impaired and measures such impairment based upon
available cash flows and the value of the collateral. Allowance or
reserve levels are estimated for all other graded loans in the
portfolio based on their assigned credit risk grade, type of loan
and other matters related to credit risk.
Management uses the
information developed from the procedures described above in
evaluating and grading the loan portfolio. This continual grading
process is used to monitor the credit quality of the loan portfolio
and to assist management in estimating the allowance for loan
losses. The provision for loan losses charged or credited to
earnings is based upon management’s judgment of the amount
necessary to maintain the allowance at a level appropriate to
absorb probable incurred losses in the loan portfolio at the
balance sheet date. The amount each quarter is dependent upon many
factors, including growth and changes in the composition of the
loan portfolio, net charge-offs, delinquencies, management’s
assessment of loan portfolio quality, the value of collateral, and
other macro-economic factors and trends. The evaluation of these
factors is performed quarterly by management through an analysis of
the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses.
The
allowance for loan losses is comprised of three components:
specific reserves, general reserves and unallocated reserves. After
a loan has been identified as impaired, management measures
impairment. When the measure of the impaired loan is less than the
recorded investment in the loan, the amount of the impairment is
recorded as a specific reserve. These specific reserves are
determined on an individual loan basis based on management’s
current evaluation of the Bank’s loss exposure for each
credit, given the appraised value of any underlying collateral.
Loans for which specific reserves are provided are excluded from
the general allowance calculations as described below.
The
general allowance reflects reserves established under GAAP for
collective loan impairment. These reserves are based upon
historical net charge-offs using the greater of the last two,
three, four or five years’ loss experience. This charge-off
experience may be adjusted to reflect the effects of current
conditions. The Bank considers information derived from its loan
risk ratings and external data related to industry and general
economic trends in establishing reserves.
The
unallocated allowance is determined through management’s
assessment of probable losses that are in the portfolio but are not
adequately captured by the other two components of the allowance,
including consideration of current economic and business conditions
and regulatory requirements. The unallocated allowance also
reflects management’s acknowledgement of the imprecision and
subjectivity that underlie the modeling of credit risk. Due to the
subjectivity involved in determining the overall allowance,
including the unallocated portion, the unallocated portion may
fluctuate from period to period based on management’s
evaluation of the factors affecting the assumptions used in
calculating the allowance.
Effective December
31, 2012, stated income mortgage loans from the former Banco
division of the Bank were analyzed separately from other single
family residential loans in the Bank’s loan portfolio. These
loans are first mortgage loans made to the Latino market, primarily
in Mecklenburg, North Carolina and surrounding counties. These
loans are non-traditional mortgages in that the customer normally
did not have a credit history, so all credit information was
accumulated by the loan officers. These loans were made as stated
income loans rather than full documentation loans because the
customer may not have had complete documentation on the income
supporting the loan.
37
Various
regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination
process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan
losses. Such agencies may require adjustments to the allowance
based on their judgments of information available to them at the
time of their examinations. Management believes it has established
the allowance for credit losses pursuant to GAAP, and has taken
into account the views of its regulators and the current economic
environment. Management considers the allowance for loan losses
adequate to cover the estimated losses inherent in the Bank’s
loan portfolio as of the date of the financial statements. Although
management uses the best information available to make evaluations,
significant future additions to the allowance may be necessary
based on changes in economic and other conditions, thus adversely
affecting the operating results of the Company.
There
were no significant changes in the estimation methods or
fundamental assumptions used in the evaluation of the allowance for
loan losses for the three months ended June 30, 2018 as compared to
the three months ended June 30, 2017. Revisions, estimates and
assumptions may be made in any period in which the supporting
factors indicate that loss levels may vary from the previous
estimates.
The
allowance for loan losses at June 30, 2018 was $6.3 million or
0.80% of total loans, as compared to $6.4 million or 0.84% of total
loans at December 31, 2017.
The
following table presents the percentage of loans assigned to each
risk grade at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017.
|
Percentage of
Loans
|
|
|
By Risk
Grade
|
|
Risk
Grade
|
6/30/2018
|
12/31/2017
|
Risk Grade 1
(Excellent Quality)
|
1.12%
|
1.31%
|
Risk Grade 2 (High
Quality)
|
26.30%
|
26.23%
|
Risk Grade 3 (Good
Quality)
|
60.95%
|
60.69%
|
Risk Grade 4
(Management Attention)
|
8.47%
|
8.19%
|
Risk Grade 5
(Watch)
|
2.11%
|
2.54%
|
Risk Grade 6
(Substandard)
|
1.05%
|
1.04%
|
Risk Grade 7
(Doubtful)
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
Risk Grade 8
(Loss)
|
0.00%
|
0.00%
|
At June
30, 2018, including non-accrual loans, there were three
relationships exceeding $1.0 million in the Watch risk grade (which
totaled $4.5 million). There were no relationships exceeding $1.0
million in the Substandard risk grade.
Non-performing Assets. Non-performing
assets totaled $4.4 million at June 30, 2018 or 0.39% of total
assets, as compared to $3.8 million or 0.35% of total assets at December
31, 2017. Non-accrual loans were $4.3 million at June 30, 2018 and
$3.7 million at December 31, 2017. As a percentage of total loans
outstanding, non-accrual loans were 0.55% at June 30, 2018, as
compared to 0.49% at December 31, 2017. Non-accrual loans include
$4.1 million in commercial and residential mortgage loans, $123,000
in construction and land development loans and $105,000 in other
loans at June 30, 2018, as compared to $3.6 million in commercial
and residential mortgage loans, $14,000 in construction and land
development loans and $112,000 in other loans at December 31, 2017.
The Bank had no loans 90 days past due and still accruing at June
30, 2018 or December 31, 2017. Other real estate owned totaled
$90,000 at June 30, 2018, as compared to $118,000 at December 31,
2017.
Deposits.
Total deposits at June 30, 2018 were $915.0 million compared to
$907.0 million at December 31, 2017. Core deposits, which include
demand deposits, savings accounts and non-brokered certificates of
deposits of denominations less than $250,000, amounted to $896.8
million at June 30, 2018, as compared to $887.5 million at December
31, 2017.
Borrowed Funds. There were no FHLB
borrowings outstanding at June 30, 2018 and December 31,
2017.
Securities sold
under agreements to repurchase were $46.6 million at June 30, 2018,
as compared to $37.8 million at December 31, 2017.
Junior Subordinated Debentures (related to
Trust Preferred Securities). In June 2006, the Company
formed a wholly owned Delaware statutory trust, PEBK Capital Trust
II (“PEBK Trust II”), which issued $20.0 million of
guaranteed preferred beneficial interests in the Company’s
junior subordinated deferrable interest debentures. All of the
common securities of PEBK Trust II are owned by the Company. The
proceeds from the issuance of the common securities and the trust
preferred securities were used by PEBK Trust II to purchase $20.6
million of junior subordinated debentures of the Company, which pay
a floating rate equal to three-month LIBOR plus 163 basis points.
The proceeds received by the Company from the sale of the junior
subordinated debentures were used to repay in December 2006 the
trust preferred securities issued in December 2001 by PEBK Capital
Trust, a wholly owned Delaware statutory trust of the Company, and
for general purposes. The debentures represent the sole asset of
PEBK Trust II. PEBK Trust II is not included in the Consolidated
Financial Statements.
38
The
trust preferred securities issued by PEBK Trust II accrue and pay
quarterly at a floating rate of three-month LIBOR plus 163 basis
points. The Company has guaranteed distributions and other payments
due on the trust preferred securities to the extent PEBK Trust II
does not have funds with which to make the distributions and other
payments. The net combined effect of the trust preferred securities
transaction is that the Company is obligated to make the
distributions and other payments required on the trust preferred
securities.
These
trust preferred securities are mandatorily redeemable upon maturity
of the debentures on June 28, 2036, or upon earlier redemption as
provided in the indenture. The Company has the right to redeem the
debentures purchased by PEBK Trust II, in whole or in part, which
became effective on June 28, 2011. As specified in the indenture,
if the debentures are redeemed prior to maturity, the redemption
price will be the principal amount plus any accrued but unpaid
interest.
Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk
Management. The objective of the Company’s Asset
Liability and Interest Rate Risk strategies is to identify and
manage the sensitivity of net interest income to changing interest
rates and to minimize the interest rate risk between
interest-earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities at various
maturities. This is to be done in conjunction with the need to
maintain adequate liquidity and the overall goal of maximizing net
interest income.
The
Company manages its exposure to fluctuations in interest rates
through policies established by our Asset/Liability Committee
(“ALCO”). ALCO meets quarterly and has the
responsibility for approving asset/liability management policies,
formulating and implementing strategies to improve balance sheet
positioning and/or earnings and reviewing the interest rate
sensitivity of the Company. ALCO tries to minimize interest rate
risk between interest-earning assets and interest-bearing
liabilities by attempting to minimize wide fluctuations in net
interest income due to interest rate movements. The ability to
control these fluctuations has a direct impact on the profitability
of the Company. Management monitors this activity on a regular
basis through analysis of its portfolios to determine the
difference between rate sensitive assets and rate sensitive
liabilities.
The
Company’s rate sensitive assets are those earning interest at
variable rates and those with contractual maturities within one
year. Rate sensitive assets therefore include both loans and
available for sale securities. Rate sensitive liabilities include
interest-bearing checking accounts, money market deposit accounts,
savings accounts, time deposits and borrowed funds. Average rate
sensitive assets for the six months ended June 30, 2018 totaled
$1.0 billion, exceeding average rate sensitive liabilities of
$670.1 million by $334.2 million.
The
Company has an overall interest rate risk management strategy that
incorporates the use of derivative instruments to minimize
significant unplanned fluctuations in earnings that are caused by
interest rate volatility. By using derivative instruments, the
Company is exposed to credit and market risk. If the counterparty
fails to perform, credit risk is equal to the extent of the
fair-value gain in the derivative. The Company minimizes the credit
risk in derivative instruments by entering into transactions with
high-quality counterparties that are reviewed periodically by the
Company. The Company did not have any interest rate derivatives
outstanding as of June 30, 2018.
Included in the
rate sensitive assets are $285.3 million in variable rate loans
indexed to prime rate subject to immediate repricing upon changes
by the Federal Open Market Committee (“FOMC”). The
Company utilizes interest rate floors on certain variable rate
loans to protect against further downward movements in the prime
rate. At June 30, 2018, the Company had $167.2 million in loans
with interest rate floors. The floors were in effect on $7.6
million of these loans pursuant to the terms of the promissory
notes on these loans. The weighted average rate on these loans is
0.63% higher than the indexed rate on the promissory notes without
interest rate floors.
Liquidity.
The objectives of the Company’s liquidity policy are to
provide for the availability of adequate funds to meet the needs of
loan demand, deposit withdrawals, maturing liabilities and to
satisfy regulatory requirements. Both deposit and loan customer
cash needs can fluctuate significantly depending upon business
cycles, economic conditions and yields and returns available from
alternative investment opportunities. In addition, the
Company’s liquidity is affected by off-balance sheet
commitments to lend in the form of unfunded commitments to extend
credit and standby letters of credit. As of June 30, 2018, such
unfunded commitments to extend credit were $249.3 million, while
commitments in the form of standby letters of credit totaled $3.5
million.
The
Company uses several sources to meet its liquidity requirements.
The primary source is core deposits, which includes demand
deposits, savings accounts and non-brokered certificates of deposit
of denominations less than $250,000. The Company considers these to
be a stable portion of the Company’s liability mix and the
result of on-going consumer and commercial banking relationships.
As of June 30, 2018, the Company’s core deposits totaled
$896.8 million, or 98.01% of total deposits.
39
The
other sources of funding for the Company are through large
denomination certificates of deposit, including brokered deposits,
federal funds purchased, securities under agreements to repurchase
and FHLB borrowings. The Bank is also able to borrow from the
Federal Reserve Bank (“FRB”) on a short-term basis. The
Company’s policies include the ability to access wholesale
funding of up to 40% of total assets. The Company’s wholesale
funding includes FHLB borrowings, FRB borrowings, brokered
deposits, internet certificates of deposit and certificates of
deposit issued to the State of North Carolina. The Company’s
ratio of wholesale funding to total assets was 0.31% as of June 30,
2018.
The
Bank has a line of credit with the FHLB equal to 20% of the
Bank’s total assets. There were no FHLB borrowings
outstanding at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017. At June 30,
2018, the carrying value of loans pledged as collateral to the FHLB
totaled $139.4 million compared to $137.5 million at December 31,
2017. The remaining availability under the line of credit with the
FHLB was $85.6 million at June 30, 2018 compared to $87.2 million
at December 31, 2017. The Bank had no borrowings from the FRB at
June 30, 2018 or December 31, 2017. FRB borrowings are
collateralized by a blanket assignment on all qualifying loans that
the Bank owns which are not pledged to the FHLB. At June 30, 2018,
the carrying value of loans pledged as collateral to the FRB
totaled $419.6 million compared to $408.5 million at December 31,
2017.
The
Bank also had the ability to borrow up to $79.5 million for the
purchase of overnight federal funds from six correspondent
financial institutions as of June 30, 2018.
The
liquidity ratio for the Bank, which is defined as net cash,
interest-bearing deposits, federal funds sold and certain
investment securities, as a percentage of net deposits and
short-term liabilities was 20.44% at June 30, 2018 and 20.62% at
December 31, 2017. The minimum required liquidity ratio as defined
in the Bank’s Asset/Liability and Interest Rate Risk
Management Policy was 10% at June 30, 2018 and December 31,
2017.
Contractual Obligations and Off-Balance Sheet
Arrangements. The Company’s contractual obligations
and other commitments as of June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017 are
summarized in the table below. The Company’s contractual
obligations include junior subordinated debentures, as well as
certain payments under current lease agreements. Other commitments
include commitments to extend credit. Because not all of these
commitments to extend credit will be drawn upon, the actual cash
requirements are likely to be significantly less than the amounts
reported for other commitments below.
(Dollars in
thousands)
|
|
|
|
June
30,
2018
|
December
31,
2017
|
Contractual Cash
Obligations
|
|
|
Junior subordinated
debentures
|
$20,619
|
20,619
|
Operating lease
obligations
|
4,690
|
4,862
|
Total
|
$25,309
|
25,481
|
Other
Commitments
|
|
|
Commitments to
extend credit
|
$249,282
|
233,972
|
Standby letters of
credit and financial guarantees written
|
3,453
|
3,325
|
Income tax
credits
|
1,808
|
2,397
|
Total
|
$254,543
|
239,694
|
The
Company enters into derivative contracts from time to time to manage various
financial risks. A derivative is a financial instrument that
derives its cash flows, and therefore its value, by reference to an
underlying instrument, index or referenced interest rate.
Derivative contracts are carried at fair value on the consolidated
balance sheet with the fair value representing the net present
value of expected future cash receipts or payments based on market
interest rates as of the balance sheet date. Derivative contracts
are written in amounts referred to as notional amounts, which only
provide the basis for calculating payments between counterparties
and are not a measure of financial risk. Further discussions of
derivative instruments are included above in the section entitled
“Asset Liability and Interest Rate Risk
Management”.
Capital Resources. Shareholders’
equity was $118.2 million, or 10.63% of total assets, as of June
30, 2018, as compared to $116.0 million, or 10.62% of total assets,
as of December 31, 2017.
Annualized return
on average equity for the six months ended June 30, 2018 was
11.02%, as compared to 9.05% for the six months ended June 30,
2017. Total cash dividends paid on common stock were $1.6 million
and $1.3 million for the six months ended June 30, 2018 and 2017,
respectively.
40
The
Board of Directors, at its discretion, can issue shares of
preferred stock up to a maximum of 5,000,000 shares. The Board is
authorized to determine the number of shares, voting powers,
designations, preferences, limitations and relative rights. The
Board of Directors does not currently anticipate issuing any
additional series of preferred stock.
In
2016, the Company’s Board of Directors authorized a stock
repurchase program, pursuant to which up to $2 million was
allocated to repurchase the Company’s common stock. Any
purchases under the Company’s stock repurchase program were
made periodically as permitted by securities laws and other legal
requirements in the open market or in privately negotiated
transactions. The timing and amount of any repurchase of shares
were determined by the Company’s management, based on its
evaluation of market conditions and other factors. The Company has
repurchased approximately $2.0 million, or 92,738 shares of its
common stock, under this program as of June 30, 2018.
In 2013, the Federal Reserve Board
approved its final rule on the Basel III capital standards, which
implement changes to the regulatory capital framework for banking
organizations. The Basel III capital standards, which became
effective January 1, 2015, include new risk-based capital and
leverage ratios, which are being phased in from 2015 to 2019. The
new minimum capital level requirements applicable to the Company
and the Bank under the final rules are as follows: (i) a new common
equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5%; (ii) a Tier 1 capital ratio of
6% (increased from 4%); (iii) a total risk based capital ratio of
8% (unchanged from previous rules); and (iv) a Tier 1 leverage
ratio of 4% (unchanged from previous rules). An additional capital
conservation buffer was added to the minimum requirements for
capital adequacy purposes beginning on January 1, 2016 at 0.625%
and is being phased in through 2019 (increasing by 0.625% on each
subsequent January 1, until it reaches 2.5% on January 1, 2019).
This will result in the following minimum ratios beginning in 2019:
(i) a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 7.0%, (ii) a Tier 1
capital ratio of 8.5%, and (iii) a total capital ratio of 10.5%.
Under the final rules, institutions would be subject to limitations
on paying dividends, engaging in share repurchases, and paying
discretionary bonuses if its capital level falls below the buffer
amount. These limitations establish a maximum percentage of
eligible retained earnings that could be utilized for such
actions.
Under
the regulatory capital guidelines, financial institutions are
currently required to maintain a total risk-based capital ratio of
8.0% or greater, with a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or
greater and a common equity Tier 1 capital ratio of 4.5% or
greater, as required by the Basel III capital standards referenced
above. Tier 1 capital is generally defined as shareholders’
equity and trust preferred securities less all intangible assets
and goodwill. Tier 1 capital at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017
includes $20.0 million in trust preferred securities. The
Company’s Tier 1 capital ratio was 15.27% and 15.32% at
June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. Total risk-based
capital is defined as Tier 1 capital plus supplementary capital.
Supplementary capital, or Tier 2 capital, consists of the
Company’s allowance for loan losses, not exceeding 1.25% of
the Company’s risk-weighted assets. Total risk-based capital
ratio is therefore defined as the ratio of total capital (Tier 1
capital and Tier 2 capital) to risk-weighted assets. The
Company’s total risk-based capital ratio was 15.97% and
16.06% at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The
Company’s common equity Tier 1 capital consists of common
stock and retained earnings. The Company’s common equity Tier
1 capital ratio was 13.04% and 13.00% at June 30, 2018 and December
31, 2017, respectively. Financial institutions are also required to
maintain a leverage ratio of Tier 1 capital to total average assets
of 4.0% or greater. The Company’s Tier 1 leverage capital
ratio was 12.47% and
11.94% at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017,
respectively.
The
Bank’s Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio was 14.79% and 15.09%
at June 30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The total
risk-based capital ratio for the Bank was 15.49% and 15.83% at June
30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The Bank’s
common equity Tier 1 capital ratio was 14.79% and 15.09% at June
30, 2018 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The Bank’s Tier
1 leverage capital ratio was 11.99% and 11.69% at June 30, 2018 and
December 31, 2017, respectively.
A bank
is considered to be “well capitalized” if it has a
total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1
risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a common equity Tier 1
capital ratio of 6.5% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or
greater. Based upon these guidelines, the Bank was considered to be
“well capitalized” at June 30, 2018.
41
Item 3. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market
Risk
There
have been no material changes in the Quantitative and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk from those previously disclosed in
Part 7A. of Part II of the Company’s Form 10-K, filed with
the SEC on March 15, 2018.
Item 4. Controls and Procedures
The
Company’s management, with the participation of the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s
disclosure controls and procedures (as such term is defined in
Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”)) as of the end of
the period covered by this report. Based on such evaluation, the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer
have concluded that, as of the end of such period, the
Company’s disclosure controls and procedures are effective in
recording, processing, summarizing and reporting, on a timely
basis, information required to be disclosed by the Company in the
reports that it files or submits under the Exchange
Act.
There
have not been any changes in the Company’s internal control
over financial reporting (as such term is defined in Rules
13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) during the fiscal
quarter to which this report relates that have materially affected,
or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s
internal control over financial reporting.
PART II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1. Legal Proceedings
In the
opinion of management, the Company is not involved in any material
pending legal proceedings other than routine proceedings occurring
in the ordinary course of business.
Item 1A. Risk Factors
There
have been no material changes from the Risk Factors from those
previously disclosed in the Company’s Form 10-K in response
to Item 1A. of Part I to Form 10-K, filed with the SEC on March 15,
2018.
42
Item 2. Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use
of Proceeds
ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
Period
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased
|
Average
Price Paid per Share
|
Total
Number of Shares Purchased as Part of Publicly Announced Plans or
Programs
|
Maximum
Number (or Approximate Dollar Value) of Shares that May Yet Be
Purchased Under the Plans or Programs (2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
April 1 - 30,
2018
|
731
|
$31.40
|
-
|
$16,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
May 1 - 31,
2018
|
132
|
31.50
|
-
|
$16,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 1 - 30,
2018
|
168
|
32.00
|
-
|
$16,180
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
1,031(1)
|
$31.43
|
-
|
|
(1) The
Company purchased 1,031 shares on the open market in the three
months ended June 30, 2018 for its deferred compensation plan. All
purchases were funded by participant contributions to the
plan.
|
||||||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
Reflects dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the
Stock Repurchase Plan authorized by the Company's Board of
Directors in 2016.
|
Item 3. Defaults Upon Senior Securities
Not
applicable
Item 5. Other Information
Not
applicable
Item 6. Exhibits
Articles of
Incorporation of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (3)(i) to the Form 8-A filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on September 2, 1999
|
|
|
|
Articles of
Amendment dated December 19, 2008, regarding the Series A
Preferred Stock, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (3)(1) to the
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
December 29, 2008
|
|
|
|
Articles of
Amendment dated February 26, 2010, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (3)(2) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 25, 2010
|
|
|
|
Second Amended and
Restated Bylaws of the Registrant, incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (3)(ii) to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on June 24, 2015
|
|
|
|
Specimen Stock
Certificate, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (4) to the Form
8-A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on September
2, 1999
|
43
Amended and
Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
Bank and Tony W. Wolfe dated December 18, 2008, incorporated
by reference to Exhibit (10)(a)(iii) to the Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29,
2008
|
|
|
|
Amended and
Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
Bank and Joseph F. Beaman, Jr. dated December 18, 2008,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(b)(iii) to the Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29,
2008
|
|
|
|
Amended and
Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
Bank and William D. Cable, Sr. dated December 18, 2008,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(c)(iii) to the Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29,
2008
|
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement dated January 22, 2015 between the Registrant and William
D. Cable, Sr., incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(c) to the
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 9, 2015
|
|
|
|
Amended and
Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
Bank and Lance A. Sellers dated December 18, 2008,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(d)(iii) to the Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29,
2008
|
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement dated January 22, 2015 between the Registrant and Lance
A. Sellers, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(a) to the
Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on
February 9, 2015
|
|
|
|
Amended and
Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement between Peoples
Bank and A. Joseph Lampron, Jr. dated December 18, 2008,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(f)(iii) to the Form 8-K
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29,
2008
|
|
|
|
Employment
Agreement dated January 22, 2015 between the Registrant and A.
Joseph Lampron, Jr., incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(b)
to the Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
on February 9, 2015
|
Peoples Bank
Directors’ and Officers’ Deferral Plan, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(h) to the Form 10-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28, 2002
|
|
|
|
Rabbi Trust for the
Peoples Bank Directors’ and Officers’ Deferral Plan,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to the Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 28,
2002
|
|
|
|
Description of
Service Recognition Program maintained by Peoples Bank,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(i) to the Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 27,
2003
|
|
|
|
Capital Securities
Purchase Agreement dated as of June 26, 2006, by and among the
Registrant, PEBK Capital Trust II and Bear, Sterns Securities
Corp., incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(j) to the Form 10-Q
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13,
2006
|
|
|
|
Amended and
Restated Trust Agreement of PEBK Capital Trust II, dated as of June
28, 2006, incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10(k) to the Form
10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November
13, 2006
|
|
|
|
Guarantee Agreement
of the Registrant dated as of June 28, 2006, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit 10(l) to the Form 10-Q filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on November 13,
2006
|
44
Indenture, dated as
of June 28, 2006, by and between the Registrant and LaSalle Bank
National Association, as Trustee, relating to Junior Subordinated
Debt Securities Due September 15, 2036, incorporated by reference
to Exhibit 10(m) to the Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on November 13, 2006
|
|
|
|
Form of Amended and
Restated Director Supplemental Retirement Agreement between Peoples
Bank and Directors Robert C. Abernethy, James S. Abernethy, Douglas
S. Howard, John W. Lineberger, Jr., Gary E. Matthews,
Dr. Billy L. Price, Jr., Larry E Robinson, W. Gregory Terry,
Dan Ray Timmerman, Sr., and Benjamin I. Zachary, incorporated by
reference to Exhibit (10)(n) to the Form 8-K filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on December 29,
2008
|
|
|
|
2009 Omnibus Stock
Ownership and Long Term Incentive Plan incorporated by reference to
Exhibit (10)(o) to the Form 10-K filed with the Securities and
Exchange Commission on March 20, 2009
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement
between Peoples Bank and Lance A. Sellers dated February 16, 2018,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(xx) to the Form 10-Q
filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18,
2018
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement
between Peoples Bank and A. Joseph Lampron, Jr. dated February 16,
2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(xxi) to the Form
10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18,
2018
|
|
|
|
First Amendment to
Amended and Restated Executive Salary Continuation Agreement
between Peoples Bank and William D. Cable, Sr. dated February 16,
2018, incorporated by reference to Exhibit (10)(xxii) to the Form
10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 18,
2018
|
|
|
|
Code of Business
Conduct and Ethics of Peoples Bancorp of North Carolina, Inc.,
incorporated by reference to Exhibit (14) to the Form 10-K filed
with the Securities and Exchange Commission on March 25,
2005
|
|
|
|
Certification of
principal executive officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
Certification of
principal financial officer pursuant to section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
Certification
Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. Section 1350, as adopted pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
Exhibit
(101)
|
The following
materials from the Company’s 10-Q Report for the quarterly
period ended June 30, 2018, formatted in XBRL: (i) the Condensed
Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Condensed Consolidated
Statements of Earnings, (iii) the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Comprehensive Income (iv) the Condensed Consolidated Statements
of Changes in Shareholders’ Equity, (v) the Condensed
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows, and (vi) the Notes to the
Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements, tagged as blocks of
text.*
|
|
|
|
*Furnished, not
filed.
|
45
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the
requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned thereunto duly authorized.
|
Peoples Bancorp of
North Carolina, Inc.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2018 |
By:
|
/s/
Lance
A. Sellers
|
|
Date
|
|
Lance A. Sellers |
|
|
|
President and Chief
Executive Officer
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|
|
|
|
|
August 7, 2018 |
By:
|
/s/
A.
Joseph Lampron, Jr.
|
|
Date
|
|
A. Joseph Lampron, Jr. |
|
|
|
Executive Vice
President and Chief Financial Officer
(Principal
Financial and Principal Accounting Officer)
|
|
46