PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORP /MS/ - Quarter Report: 2010 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
þ | QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2010
or
o | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number 001-12103
PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
Mississippi | 64-0709834 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
Lameuse and Howard Avenues, Biloxi, Mississippi | 39533 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(228) 435-5511
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by
Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter
period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days. Yes þ No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405
of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to
submit and post such files.) Yes o No o
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer,
a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer o | Accelerated filer þ | Non-accelerated filer o Do not check if a smaller reporting company |
Smaller reporting company o |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes o No þ
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the last practicable date. Peoples Financial Corporation has only one class of common stock
authorized. At July 30, 2010, there were 15,000,000 shares of $1 par value common stock
authorized, with 5,151,697 shares issued and outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Part 1 Financial Information
Item 1: Financial Statements
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Condition
Consolidated Statements of Condition
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
Assets |
$ | 43,112,297 | $ | 29,155,294 | ||||
Cash and due from banks |
||||||||
Available for sale securities |
341,083,476 | 311,434,437 | ||||||
Held to maturity securities, fair
value of $2,956,033 at June 30, 2010;
$3,340,974 at December 31, 2009 |
2,813,459 | 3,201,966 | ||||||
Other investments |
4,020,754 | 4,036,304 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at cost |
3,370,800 | 5,015,900 | ||||||
Loans |
445,735,665 | 464,976,291 | ||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
9,167,927 | 7,827,806 | ||||||
Loans, net |
436,567,738 | 457,148,485 | ||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net of
accumulated depreciation |
30,373,816 | 31,418,884 | ||||||
Other real estate |
1,396,913 | 1,521,313 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
4,020,798 | 4,646,752 | ||||||
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
15,653,219 | 15,329,394 | ||||||
Prepaid FDIC assessments |
4,326,024 | 4,958,309 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,759,991 | 1,139,861 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 888,499,285 | $ | 869,006,899 | ||||
2
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Condition (continued)
Consolidated Statements of Condition (continued)
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
Liabilities & Shareholders Equity |
||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand, non-interest bearing |
$ | 116,673,172 | $ | 96,541,387 | ||||
Savings and demand, interest bearing |
206,496,989 | 206,167,484 | ||||||
Time, $100,000 or more |
145,870,422 | 117,347,663 | ||||||
Other time deposits |
50,514,505 | 50,644,895 | ||||||
Total deposits |
519,555,088 | 470,701,429 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase |
170,872,263 | 174,430,877 | ||||||
Borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank |
53,816,167 | 104,270,452 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
37,433,697 | 16,016,204 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
781,677,215 | 765,418,962 | ||||||
Shareholders Equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $1 par value, 15,000,000 shares
authorized, 5,151,697 shares issued and outstanding
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 |
5,151,697 | 5,151,697 | ||||||
Surplus |
65,780,254 | 65,780,254 | ||||||
Undivided profits |
34,604,196 | 32,853,346 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax |
1,285,923 | (197,360 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders equity |
106,822,070 | 103,587,937 | ||||||
Total liabilities & shareholders equity |
$ | 888,499,285 | $ | 869,006,899 | ||||
See selected notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 4,893,342 | $ | 5,086,063 | $ | 9,880,468 | $ | 10,204,455 | ||||||||
Interest and dividends on securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury |
131,216 | 322,981 | 325,478 | 776,319 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
2,312,723 | 2,494,405 | 4,612,426 | 4,769,764 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
132,048 | 387,501 | 518,924 | 791,654 | ||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
316,668 | 301,314 | 673,597 | 612,423 | ||||||||||||
Other investments |
3,203 | 1,953 | 7,654 | 6,894 | ||||||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold |
1,557 | 544 | 5,336 | 1,437 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
7,790,757 | 8,594,761 | 16,023,883 | 17,162,946 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
849,297 | 1,396,989 | 1,666,786 | 2,953,687 | ||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
109,559 | 110,985 | 246,204 | 271,777 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
276,351 | 517,320 | 562,741 | 1,093,672 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
1,235,207 | 2,025,294 | 2,475,731 | 4,319,136 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
6,555,550 | 6,569,467 | 13,548,152 | 12,843,810 | ||||||||||||
Provision for allowance for losses on loans |
1,585,000 | 1,502,000 | 2,735,000 | 1,850,000 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision for
allowance for losses on loans |
$ | 4,970,550 | $ | 5,067,467 | $ | 10,813,152 | $ | 10,993,810 | ||||||||
4
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income (continued)
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Income (continued)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Trust department income and fees |
$ | 282,941 | $ | 325,750 | $ | 590,237 | $ | 662,016 | ||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
1,579,485 | 1,702,090 | 3,151,988 | 3,365,397 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sales or calls of securities |
1,563,441 | 2 | 1,567,486 | 136,799 | ||||||||||||
Other income |
258,660 | 138,534 | 507,949 | 624,585 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
3,684,527 | 2,166,376 | 5,817,660 | 4,788,797 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
3,398,188 | 3,694,321 | 6,810,463 | 7,074,699 | ||||||||||||
Net occupancy |
544,121 | 641,242 | 1,068,898 | 1,193,103 | ||||||||||||
Equipment rentals, depreciation and maintenance |
951,312 | 954,189 | 1,886,765 | 1,904,556 | ||||||||||||
FDIC assessments |
390,517 | 544,516 | 740,904 | 624,439 | ||||||||||||
Other expense |
1,402,857 | 1,248,868 | 3,109,245 | 2,842,136 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
6,686,995 | 7,083,136 | 13,616,275 | 13,638,933 | ||||||||||||
Income
before income taxes |
1,968,082 | 150,707 | 3,014,537 | 2,143,674 | ||||||||||||
Income taxes |
522,000 | (50,000 | ) | 697,000 | 240,000 | |||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,446,082 | $ | 200,707 | $ | 2,317,537 | $ | 1,903,674 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share |
$ | .28 | $ | .04 | $ | .45 | $ | .37 | ||||||||
See selected notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity
Consolidated Statement of Shareholders Equity
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Common | Undivided | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Stock | Surplus | Profits | Income (Loss) | Income | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2010 |
5,151,697 | $ | 5,151,697 | $ | 65,780,254 | $ | 32,853,346 | $ | (197,360 | ) | $ | 103,587,937 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive Income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
2,317,537 | $ | 2,317,537 | 2,317,537 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain on
available for sale
securities, net of tax |
2,517,824 | 2,517,824 | 2,517,824 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for available
for sale securities called
or sold in current year,
net of tax |
(1,034,541 | ) | (1,034,541 | ) | (1,034,541 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive gain |
$ | 3,800,820 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend declared,
($.11 per share) |
(566,687 | ) | (566,687 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, June 30, 2010 |
5,151,697 | $ | 5,151,697 | $ | 65,780,254 | $ | 34,604,196 | $ | 1,285,923 | $ | 106,822,070 | |||||||||||||||||
Note: Balances as of January 1, 2010 were audited. |
See selected notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 2,317,537 | $ | 1,903,674 | ||||
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
1,218,000 | 1,212,000 | ||||||
Provision for allowance for loan losses |
2,735,000 | 1,850,000 | ||||||
Loss on writedown of other real estate |
77,350 | |||||||
Loss on sales of other real estate |
39,350 | |||||||
(Gain) loss on other investments |
15,550 | (110,338 | ) | |||||
Gain on sales and calls of securities |
(1,567,486 | ) | (136,799 | ) | ||||
Loss on impairment of equity securities |
149,517 | |||||||
Change in accrued interest receivable |
625,954 | 450,450 | ||||||
Change in other assets |
15,556 | 100,299 | ||||||
Change in other liabilities |
20,596,976 | 1,504,614 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
26,073,787 | 6,923,417 | ||||||
Cash
flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from maturities, sales and calls of available for
sale securities |
147,206,124 | 145,473,727 | ||||||
Investment in available for sale securities |
(173,037,295 | ) | (190,412,284 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of held to maturity securities |
389,920 | 195,000 | ||||||
Investment in held to maturity securities |
(1,413 | ) | (1,352 | ) | ||||
(Investment in) redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
1,645,100 | (1,452,200 | ) | |||||
Proceeds from sales of other real estate |
807,500 | 326,076 | ||||||
Loans, net change |
17,045,947 | (5,337,134 | ) | |||||
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
(172,932 | ) | (261,131 | ) | ||||
Other assets |
(325,325 | ) | (339,903 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
$ | (6,442,374 | ) | $ | (51,809,201 | ) | ||
7
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued)
(Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2010 | 2009 | |||||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Demand and savings deposits, net change |
$ | 20,461,290 | $ | (40,653,986 | ) | |||
Time deposits, net change |
28,392,369 | 48,472,013 | ||||||
Cash dividends |
(515,170 | ) | (1,583,780 | ) | ||||
Retirement of common stock |
(2,366,559 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank |
390,669,662 | 136,000,000 | ||||||
Repayments to Federal Home Loan Bank |
(441,123,947 | ) | (100,080,551 | ) | ||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase, net change |
(3,558,614 | ) | 10,361,740 | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
(5,674,410 | ) | 50,148,877 | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
13,957,003 | 5,263,093 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year |
29,155,294 | 34,019,590 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year |
$ | 43,112,297 | $ | 39,282,683 | ||||
See selected notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
SELECTED NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 and 2009
1. Basis of Presentation:
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contain all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly, in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, the
financial position of Peoples Financial Corporation and its subsidiaries (the Company) as of
June 30, 2010 and the results of their operations and their cash flows for the periods presented.
The interim financial information should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated
financial statements and the notes thereto included in the Companys 2009 Annual Report and Form
10-K.
The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2010, are not necessarily indicative
of the results to be expected for the full year.
Use of Estimates The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent
assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those
estimates.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies The accounting and reporting policies of the Company
conform with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and general
practices within the banking industry. There have been no material changes or developments in the
application of principles or in our evaluation of the accounting estimates and the underlying
assumptions or methodologies that we believe to be Critical Accounting Policies as disclosed in
our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
2. Earnings Per Share:
Per share data is based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding of 5,151,697
and 5,189,474 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively, and 5,151,697 and
5,157,356 for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
3. Statements of Cash Flows:
The Company has defined cash and cash equivalents to include cash and due from banks and federal
funds sold. The Company paid $2,475,536 and $4,442,281 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively, for interest on deposits and borrowings. Income tax payments of $625,000 and
$520,000 were made during the six months ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Loans in the
amount of $799,800 and $2,383,363 were transferred to other real estate during the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
9
Table of Contents
4.
Investments:
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of securities at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively, were as follows:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
unrealized | unrealized | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | Amortized cost | gains | losses | fair value | ||||||||||||
Available for sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury |
$ | 62,980,917 | $ | 110,221 | $ | (58 | ) | $ | 63,091,080 | |||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
235,197,987 | 2,197,267 | 237,395,254 | |||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
39,006,292 | 1,208,332 | (267,465 | ) | 39,947,159 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities |
337,185,196 | 3,515,820 | (267,523 | ) | 340,433,493 | |||||||||||
Equity securities |
649,983 | 649,983 | ||||||||||||||
Total available for sale securities |
$ | 337,835,179 | $ | 3,515,820 | $ | (267,523 | ) | $ | 341,083,476 | |||||||
Held to maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 2,813,459 | $ | 142,574 | $ | $ | 2,956,033 | |||||||||
Total held to maturity securities |
$ | 2,813,459 | $ | 142,574 | $ | $ | 2,956,033 | |||||||||
10
Table of Contents
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
unrealized | unrealized | Estimated | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 | Amortized cost | gains | losses | fair value | ||||||||||||
Available for sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury |
$ | 23,987,222 | $ | 752,918 | $ | $ | 24,740,140 | |||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
216,473,270 | 695,213 | (2,590,287 | ) | 214,578,196 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
30,035,546 | 1,278,310 | (51,186 | ) | 31,262,670 | |||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
39,290,502 | 1,179,412 | (266,466 | ) | 40,203,448 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities |
309,786,540 | 3,905,853 | (2,907,939 | ) | 310,784,454 | |||||||||||
Equity securities |
649,983 | 649,983 | ||||||||||||||
Total available for sale securities |
$ | 310,436,523 | $ | 3,905,853 | $ | (2,907,939 | ) | $ | 311,434,437 | |||||||
Held to maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 3,201,966 | $ | 139,008 | $ | $ | 3,340,974 | |||||||||
Total held to maturity securities |
$ | 3,201,966 | $ | 139,008 | $ | $ | 3,340,974 | |||||||||
The Companys available for sale securities are
reported at their estimated fair value, which is
determined utilizing several sources. The primary source is Interactive Data Corporation, which
utilizes pricing models that vary based on asset class and include available trade, bid and other
market information and whose methodology includes broker quotes, proprietary models and vast
descriptive databases. The other source for determining fair value is matrix pricing, which is a
mathematical technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying
exclusively on quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities
relationship to other benchmark quoted securities.
The balances of available for sale
securities, which are the only assets measured at fair value
on a recurring basis, by level within the hierarchy, as of June 30, 2010 and December
31, 2009 were as follows:
Fair Value Measurement Using | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
$ | 341,083,476 | $ | 341,083,476 | ||||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
311,434,437 | 311,434,437 |
At June 30, 2010, available for sale securities with an amortized cost of $337,835,179 were reported
at a fair value, net of unrealized gains and losses, of $341,083,476. The net change in unrealized
11
Table of Contents
gains and losses of $1,483,283 was
included in comprehensive income during the first six months of
2010. At December 31, 2009, available for sale securities with an amortized cost of $310,436,523
were reported at a fair value, net of unrealized gains and losses, of $311,434,437. The net change
in unrealized gains and losses of $(2,867,464) was included in comprehensive income during the
year ended December 31, 2009.
The amortized cost and estimated fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2010, by contractual
maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because
borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
Estimated | ||||||||
Amortized cost | fair value | |||||||
Available for sale securities: |
||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 63,698,272 | $ | 63,754,739 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
64,964,724 | 65,940,252 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
81,332,261 | 82,713,623 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
127,189,939 | 128,024,879 | ||||||
Totals |
$ | 337,185,196 | $ | 340,433,493 | ||||
Held to maturity securities: |
||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 210,000 | $ | 214,396 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
1,606,493 | 1,705,043 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
996,966 | 1,036,594 | ||||||
Totals |
$ | 2,813,459 | $ | 2,956,033 | ||||
Securities with gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively,
aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a
continuous loss position are as follows:
Less Than Twelve Months | Over Twelve Months | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasury |
$ | 9,999,450 | $ | 58 | $ | $ | $ | 9,999,450 | $ | 58 | ||||||||||||||
States and
political
subdivisions |
5,574,761 | 175,343 | 1,851,672 | 92,122 | 7,426,433 | 267,465 | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
$ | 15,574,211 | $ | 175,401 | $ | 1,851,672 | $ | 92,122 | $ | 17,425,883 | $ | 267,523 | ||||||||||||
12
Table of Contents
Less Than Twelve Months | Over Twelve Months | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2009: | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | Fair Value | Loss | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Government
Agencies |
$ | 138,913,530 | $ | 2,590,287 | $ | $ | $ | 138,913,530 | $ | 2,590,287 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed
Securities |
4,856,429 | 51,186 | 4,856,429 | 51,186 | ||||||||||||||||||||
States and
political
subdivisions |
9,501,227 | 148,396 | 2,520,564 | 118,070 | 12,021,791 | 266,466 | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
$ | 153,271,186 | $ | 2,789,869 | $ | 2,520,564 | $ | 118,070 | $ | 155,791,750 | $ | 2,907,939 | ||||||||||||
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a monthly basis. In
performing this evaluation, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less
than cost, the fact that the Companys securities are primarily issued by U.S. Treasury and U.S.
Government Agencies and the cause of the decline in value are considered. In addition, the Company
does not intend to sell and it is not more than likely than not that we will be required to sell
these securities before maturity. While some available for sale securities have been sold for
liquidity purposes, the Company has traditionally held its securities, including those classified
as available for sale, until maturity. As a result of this evaluation, the Company has determined
that the declines summarized in the tables above are not deemed to be other-than-temporary.
5. Past Due and Impaired Loans:
Loans past due ninety days or more and still accruing were $7,595,175 and $6,733,659 at June 30,
2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively.
One loan in the Companys portfolio, which had been on nonaccrual status since 2008, had a Chapter
11 bankruptcy plan of reorganization confirmed on April 15, 2010. The Company modified the terms
of the loan in accordance with the bankruptcy plan, which requires the payment of interest only
for a period of 12 months and payment of principal and interest for 60 months, with a balloon
payment due on April 15, 2016. The Companys policy is to remove loans from nonaccrual status when
the obligation is brought current or has performed in accordance with the contractual terms for a
reasonable period of time and the ultimate collectability of the total contractual principal and
interest is no longer in doubt. At June 30, 2010, the loan, the balance of which was $2,853,896,
was classified as a troubled debt restructuring. Management has restored this loan to accrual
status because this customer continues to perform under its re-negotiated terms and the bankruptcy
plan requires that the payments due in the first year be applied as interest. Management has
reviewed the loan and believes the borrowers financial performance provides sufficient evidence
to classify this loan as impaired.
Impaired loans include the restructured loan of $2,853,896 at June 30, 2010
and nonaccrual loans
13
Table of Contents
which amounted to $23,460,870 and $22,005,748 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009,
respectively. The average recorded investment in impaired loans amounted to approximately
$16,548,477 and $25,551,787 at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. The Company had
$3,014,914 and $1,895,414 of specific allowance related to impaired loans at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively. No material interest income was recognized on
impaired loans for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and the year ended December 31, 2009.
At each reporting period, the Company determines which loans are impaired. Accordingly, the
Companys impaired loans are reported at their estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis. An
allowance for each impaired loan is calculated based on the present value of expected future cash
flows discounted at the loans effective interest rate, the loans observable market price or the
fair value of its collateral. Most of the Companys impaired loans are collateral-dependent. The
fair value of the collateral for these loans is based on appraisals performed by third-party
valuation specialists, comparable sales and other estimates of fair value obtained principally from
independent sources, adjusted for estimated selling costs. Factors including the assumptions and
techniques utilized by the appraiser, changes in market conditions from the time of valuation and
estimated sales value based on Managements plans for disposition which could result in adjustment
to the collateral value estimates indicated in the appraisal are considered by the Company. The
criteria for determining whether an existing appraisal remains valid will vary depending upon the
condition of the property, time, volatility of the local market and loan to value issues.
Appraisals relating to collateral for impaired loans may be
discounted by 20% - 35% based on
whether the collateral is vacant land, property under construction, completed building, etc. If the
recorded investment in the impaired loan exceeds the measure of fair value of the collateral, a
valuation allowance is recorded as a component of the allowance for loan losses.
The balances of impaired loans, which are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, by
level within the hierarchy as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
$ | 23,299,852 | $ | $ | 12,945,969 | $ | 10,353,883 | |||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
20,110,334 | 20,110,334 |
The following table sets forth a summary of changes in the fair value of impaired loans, the
Companys only Level 3 assets:
For the six | ||||
months ended | ||||
June 30, 2010 | ||||
Fair value, beginning of period |
$ | |||
Net gains |
10,353,883 | |||
Fair value, end of period |
$ | 10,353,883 | ||
At June 30, 2010, impaired loans with a carrying amount of $13,078,588 were written down to
their fair value of $12,945,969 through a $132,619 charge to the provision for loan losses in prior
periods.
14
Table of Contents
At December 31, 2009, impaired loans with a carrying amount of $22,005,748 were written down to
their fair value of $20,110,334 through a $1,895,414 charge to the provision for loan losses in
prior periods.
When Management determines that it has sustained a loss on a loan, it may be necessary to
foreclose on the related collateral. Other real estate acquired through foreclosure is carried at
fair value, less estimated costs to sell. The fair value of the collateral is based on appraisals
performed by third-party valuation specialists. Factors including the assumptions and techniques
utilized by the appraiser are considered by Management. If the current appraisal is more than one
year old and/or the loan balance is more than $200,000, a new appraisal is obtained. Otherwise,
the bank subsidiarys in-house property evaluator and management will determine the fair value of
the collateral, based on comparable sales, market conditions, Managements plans for disposition
and other estimates of fair value obtained from principally independent sources, adjusted for
estimated selling costs. Accordingly, the Companys other real estate is reported at its
estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis.
The balances of other real estate, which are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, by
level within the hierarchy as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 were as follows:
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2010 |
$ | 1,396,913 | $ | $ | 1,396,913 | $ | ||||||||||
December 31, 2009 |
1,521,313 | 1,521,313 |
6. Allowance for Loan Losses:
Transactions in the allowance for loan losses were as follows:
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2010 | 2009 | 2010 | 2009 | |||||||||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 8,278,805 | $ | 11,372,866 | $ | 7,827,806 | $ | 11,113,575 | ||||||||
Recoveries |
18,584 | 224,212 | 74,201 | 329,634 | ||||||||||||
Loans charged off |
(714,462 | ) | (3,301,197 | ) | (1,469,080 | ) | (3,495,328 | ) | ||||||||
Provision for allowance for loan losses |
1,585,000 | 1,502,000 | 2,735,000 | 1,850,000 | ||||||||||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 9,167,927 | $ | 9,797,881 | $ | 9,167,927 | $ | 9,797,881 | ||||||||
7. Deposits:
At June 30, 2010, time deposits of $100,000 or more include brokered deposits of
$34,966,000 which have maturity dates from July 24, 2010 - March 18, 2011.
8. Other Comprehensive Income:
The income tax effect from the unrealized loss on available for sale securities on accumulated
other
15
Table of Contents
comprehensive income was $764,115 at June 30, 2010.
9. Shareholders Equity:
On June 23, 2010, the Board approved a semi-annual dividend of $.11 per share with a record
date of July 9, 2010 and distribution date of July 16, 2010.
10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The carrying amounts and estimated fair value for financial assets and financial liabilities
at June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009, respectively, were
as follows:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Financial Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 43,112,297 | $ | 43,112,297 | $ | 29,155,294 | $ | 29,155,294 | ||||||||
Available for sale securities |
341,083,476 | 341,083,476 | 311,434,437 | 311,434,437 | ||||||||||||
Held to maturity securities |
2,813,459 | 2,956,033 | 3,201,966 | 3,340,974 | ||||||||||||
Other investments |
4,020,754 | 4,020,754 | 4,036,304 | 4,036,304 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
3,370,800 | 3,370,800 | 5,015,900 | 5,015,900 | ||||||||||||
Loans, net |
436,567,738 | 439,954,148 | 457,148,485 | 460,587,836 | ||||||||||||
Cash surrender value |
15,653,219 | 15,653,219 | 15,329,394 | 15,329,394 | ||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing |
116,673,172 | 116,673,172 | 96,541,387 | 96,541,387 | ||||||||||||
Interest bearing |
402,881,916 | 403,150,698 | 374,160,042 | 375,051,835 | ||||||||||||
Total deposits |
519,555,088 | 519,823,870 | 470,701,429 | 471,593,222 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and
securities sold under agreements
to repurchase |
170,872,263 | 170,872,263 | 174,430,877 | 174,430,877 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings from Federal Home Loan
Bank |
53,816,167 | 55,805,381 | 104,270,452 | 105,815,000 |
11. New Accounting Pronouncements:
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-09, Subsequent
Events: Amendments to Certain Recognition and Disclosure Requirements (ASU No. 2010-09).
ASU No. 2010-09 removes some contradictions between the requirements of U.S. GAAP and the
filing rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC). SEC filers are required to
evaluate subsequent events through the date the financial statements are issued, and they
are no longer required to disclose the date through which subsequent events have been
evaluated. This guidance was effective upon issuance except for the use of the issued date
for conduit debt obligors, and it is not expected to have a material impact on Companys
results of operations, financial position or disclosures.
In February 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-10, Consolidation:
Amendments for Certain Investment Funds (ASU No. 2010-10). ASU No. 2010-10 indefinitely
defers the effective date for certain investment funds, the amendments made to FASB ASC
810-10 related to variable interest entities by Statement of Financial Accounting Standard
(SFAS) No. 167,
16
Table of Contents
however this deferral does not apply to the disclosure requirements of SFAS No. 167. ASU No.
2010-10 also clarifies that (1) interests of related parties must be considered in determining
whether fees paid to decision makers or service providers constitute a variable interest, and (2)
a quantitative calculation should not be the only basis on which such determination is made. This
guidance is effective as of the beginning of the first annual period beginning after November
15, 2009, and for interim periods within that first annual reporting period. It is not expected to
have a material impact on Companys results of operations, financial position or disclosures.
In
March 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update
No. 2010-11, Derivatives and Hedging: Scope Exception Related to
Embedded Credit Derivatives (ASU No. 2010-11). ASU No. 2010-11
clarifies the type of embedded credit derivative that is exempt from embedded derivative
bifurcation requirements, by resolving a potential ambiguity about the breadth of the embedded
credit derivative scope exception with regard to some types of contracts, such as collateralized
debt obligations (CDOs) and synthetic CDOs. The scope exception will no longer apply to some
contracts that contain an embedded credit derivative feature that
transfers credit risk. The ASU is effective for fiscal quarters beginning after June 15, 2010, and is not expected to have a
material impact on Companys results of operations, financial position or disclosures.
In April 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-18, Effect of a Loan
Modification When the Loan is Part of a Pool That Is Accounted for as
a Single Asset (ASU No. 2010-18). ASU No. 2010-18 allows for the one-time election to terminate accounting for loans as a
pool under ASU Subtopic 310-30. This election may be applied on a pool-by-pool basis and does not
preclude an entity from applying pool accounting to subsequent acquisitions of loans with credit
deterioration. ASU No. 2010-18 is effective for modifications of loans accounted for within pools
under Subtopic 310-30 occurring in the first interim or annual period ending on or after July 15,
2010. It is not expected to have a material impact on Companys results of operations, financial
position or disclosures.
In July 2010, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-20, Disclosures about the
Credit Quality of Financing Receivables and the Allowance for Credit Losses (ASU No. 2010-20).
ASU 2010-20 requires enhanced disclosures, including a greater level of disaggregated information,
about the credit quality of financial receivables and the allowance for credit losses.
Additionally, this standards update also requires an entity to disclose credit quality indicators,
past due information, modifications to financing receivables and significant purchases and sales
of financing receivables. The disclosures as of the end of a reporting period under ASU 2010-20
are effective for the Company for interim and annual reporting periods ending on or after December
15, 2010. The disclosures about activity that occurs during a reporting period are effective for
the Company for interim and annual reporting periods beginning on or
after December 15, 2010. It is
not expected to have a material impact on Companys results of operations or financial position,
but will require additional disclosures.
12. Reclassifications:
Certain reclassifications, which had no effect on prior year net income, have been made to prior
period statements to conform to current year presentation.
17
Table of Contents
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
GENERAL
The Company is a one-bank holding company headquartered in Biloxi, Mississippi. It has two
operating subsidiaries, PFC Service Corp. and The Peoples Bank, Biloxi, Mississippi (the Bank).
The Bank provides a full range of banking, financial and trust services to state, county and local
government entities and individuals and small and commercial
businesses in Harrison, Hancock,
Stone and Jackson counties in Mississippi.
The following presents Managements discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial
condition and results of operations of Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries. These
comments should be considered in combination with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report on Form 10-Q and the Consolidated
Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Managements Discussion and
Analysis included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2009.
Forward-Looking Information
Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 in an effort to encourage
corporations to provide information about a companys anticipated future financial performance.
This act provides a safe harbor for such disclosure which protects the companies from unwarranted
litigation if actual results are different from management expectations. This report contains
forward-looking statements and reflects industry conditions, company performance and financial
results. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties
which could cause the Companys actual results and experience to differ from the anticipated
results and expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. Such factors and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to: changes in interest rates and market prices, changes
in local economic and business conditions, increased competition for deposits and loans, a
deviation in actual experience from the underlying assumptions used to determine and establish the
allowance for loan losses, changes in the availability of funds resulting from reduced liquidity,
changes in government regulations and acts of terrorism, weather or other events beyond the
Companys control.
New Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB has issued a number of Accounting Standards Updates, which have been disclosed in Note
11. The Company does not expect that any of these updates will have a material impact on its
results of operations, financial position for disclosures.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally
accepted in the United States of America requires Management to make estimates and assumptions
that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and
expenses during the reporting period. The Company evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an
on-going basis
18
Table of Contents
using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment. We
adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Certain critical
accounting policies affect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation
of the consolidated financial statements.
Allowance for loan losses:
The Companys most critical accounting policy relates to its allowance for loan losses (ALL),
which reflects the estimated losses resulting from the inability of its borrowers to make loan
payments. The ALL is established and maintained at an amount sufficient to cover the estimated
loss associated with the loan portfolio of the Company as of the date of determination. Credit
losses arise not only from credit risk, but also from other risks inherent in the lending process
including, but not limited to, collateral risk, operation risk, concentration risk and economic
risk. As such, all related risks of lending are considered when assessing the adequacy of the ALL.
On a quarterly basis, Management estimates the probable level of losses to determine when the
allowance is adequate to absorb reasonably foreseeable, anticipated losses in the existing
portfolio based on our past loan loss experience, known and inherent risk in the portfolio,
adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay and the estimated value of any
underlying collateral and current economic conditions. If there was a deterioration of any of the
factors considered by Management in evaluating the allowance for loan losses, the estimate of loss
would be updated, and additional provisions for loan losses may be
required. The analysis divides
the portfolio into two segments: a pool analysis of loans based upon loss history by loan type and
a specific reserve analysis for those loans considered impaired under generally accepted
accounting principles. All credit relationships with an outstanding balance of $100,000 or greater
are individually reviewed for impairment. All losses are charged to the ALL when the loss actually
occurs or when a determination is made that a loss is likely to occur; recoveries are credited to
the ALL at the time of receipt.
Employee Benefit Plans:
Employee benefit plan liabilities and pension costs are determined utilizing actuarially
determined present value calculations. The valuation of the benefit obligation and net periodic
expense is considered critical, as it requires Management and its actuaries to make estimates
regarding the amount and timing of expected cash outflows including assumptions about mortality,
expected service periods and the rate of compensation increases.
OVERVIEW
The Company is a community bank serving the financial and trust needs of its customers in
Harrison, Hancock, Jackson and Stone Counties in Mississippi. Maintaining a strong core deposit
base and commercial and real estate lending in that trade area is the traditional focus of the
Company. Growth has largely been achieved through de novo activity, and it is expected that this
strategy will continue to be utilized in the future.
With the focus of our core business being on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, any significant local
events have the potential to impact the Companys business. Although the recent oil spill in the
Gulf of
19
Table of Contents
Mexico has not yet had a significant direct impact on the Company, its effects on the seafood and
tourism industries in our trade area and the local economy in general may not be known for years
to come. Additionally, the current interest rate environment, the decline in the value of real
estate and the general economic downturn on a local and national level has affected the Companys
results. Managing the net interest margin in the Companys highly competitive market and in the
context of larger national economic conditions has been very challenging and will continue to be
so for the foreseeable future.
Net income for the second quarter of 2010 was $1,446,082 compared with $200,707 for the second
quarter of 2009 and for the first half of 2010 was $2,317,537 compared with $1,903,674 for the first
half of 2009. These increases were almost entirely attributable to the gain on the sale of
securities of $1,563,441 during the second quarter of 2010. Also affecting net income were the
increase in net interest income of $704,342 and the increase in the provision for loan losses of
$885,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 as compared with the six months ended June 30,
2009, respectively.
Monitoring asset quality and addressing potential losses in our loan portfolio continues to be
emphasized during these difficult economic times, During the third quarter of 2009, non-performing
loans, particularly non-accrual loans, increased significantly and remained at those levels at
June 30, 2010. Approximately 33% of our total nonaccrual loans as of June 30, 2010 relate to one
performing credit relationship which has been classified as nonaccrual by the banking regulators
in their shared national credit review.
Total assets at June 30, 2010 increased $19,492,386 as compared with December 31, 2009. Available
for sale securities increased $29,649,039 while loans decreased $19,240,626 as principal payments
and maturities outpaced new loan volume. Deposits increased by $48,853,659 at June 30, 2010,
providing the liquidity for borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank to decrease $50,454,285 as
compared with December 31,2009.
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the amount by which interest income on loans, investments and other interest
earning assets exceeds interest expense on deposits and other borrowed funds, is the single
largest component of the Companys income. Managements objective is to provide the largest
possible amount of income while balancing interest rate, credit, liquidity and capital risk.
Changes in the volume and mix of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities combined
with changes in market rates of interest directly affect net interest income.
Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 as Compared with Quarter Ended June 30, 2009
The Companys
average interest earning assets decreased approximately $77,964,000, or 9%, from approximately
$841,780,000 for the second quarter of 2009 to approximately $763,816,000 for the second quarter of
2010. The Companys average balance sheet has shrunk as principal payments and maturities of loans
have outpaced new loans, deposits have decreased as the Company has not
20
Table of Contents
matched its competitors rates and investments have been called and sold.
The average yield on earning assets increased slightly from 4.16% for the second quarter of 2009
to 4.17% for the second quarter of 2010, with the biggest impact being to the yield on loans as
the Company began including floors on its variable rate loans.
Average interest bearing liabilities decreased approximately $75,874,000, or 11%, from
approximately $702,988,000 for the second quarter of 2009 to approximately $627,114,000 for the
second quarter of 2010. The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased 36 basis
points, from 1.15% for the second quarter of 2009 to .79% for the second quarter of 2010. This
dramatic decrease is the result of utilizing lower cost funding sources including brokered
deposits and Federal Home Loan Bank advances in 2010 as compared with 2009.
The Companys net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis, which is net interest income as a
percentage of average earning assets, was 3.52% at June 30, 2010, up 32 basis points from 3.20% at
June 30, 2009.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 as Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2009
The Companys average interest earning assets decreased approximately $58,467,000, or 7%, from
approximately $829,584,000 for the first half of 2009 to approximately $771,117,000 for the first
half of 2010. The Companys average balance sheet has shrunk as principal payments and maturities
of loans have outpaced new loans, deposits have decreased as the Company has not matched its
competitors rates and investments have been called and sold.
The average yield on earning assets increased 4 basis points, from 4.21% for the first half of
2009 to 4.25% for the first half of 2010, with the biggest impact being to the yield on loans as
the Company began including floors on its variable rate loans.
Average interest bearing liabilities decreased approximately $52,506,000, or 8%, from approximately
$689,614,000 for the first half of 2009 to approximately $637,108,000
for the first half of 2010.
The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased 47 basis points, from 1.25% for the
first half of 2009 to .78% for the first half of 2010. This decrease is the result of utilizing
lower cost funding sources including brokered deposits and Federal Home Loan Bank advances in 2010
as compared with 2009.
The Companys net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis, which is net interest income as a
percentage of average earning assets, was 3.60% at June 30, 2010, up 43 basis points from 3.17% at
June 30, 2009.
The tables on the following pages analyze the changes in tax-equivalent net interest income for
the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and 2009 and the six months
ended June 30, 2010 and 2009.
21
Table of Contents
Analysis of Average Balances, Interest Earned/Paid and Yield
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Three Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Three Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance |
Interest Earned/Paid |
Rate | Average Balance |
Interest Earned/Paid |
Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2)(3) |
$ | 445,601 | $ | 4,893 | 4.39 | % | $ | 473,432 | $ | 5,086 | 4.30 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold |
2,670 | 2 | 0.30 | % | 934 | 1 | 0.42 | % | ||||||||||||||||
HTM: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non taxable (1) |
3,025 | 36 | 4.76 | % | 3,264 | 43 | 5.27 | % | ||||||||||||||||
ATS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
267,579 | 2,576 | 3.85 | % | 328,065 | 3,205 | 3.91 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non taxable (1) |
40,340 | 444 | 4.40 | % | 33,692 | 414 | 4.92 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
4,601 | 3 | 0.26 | % | 2,393 | 2 | 0.33 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 763,816 | $ | 7,954 | 4.17 | % | $ | 841,780 | $ | 8,751 | 4.16 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings & interest-bearing
DDA |
$ | 223,111 | $ | 289 | 0.52 | % | $ | 238,775 | $ | 541 | 0.91 | % | ||||||||||||
CDs |
197,044 | 560 | 1.14 | % | 217,051 | 856 | 1.58 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased |
155,629 | 276 | 0.71 | % | 230,600 | 517 | 0.90 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
51,330 | 110 | 0.86 | % | 16,562 | 111 | 2.68 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 627,114 | $ | 1,235 | 0.79 | % | $ | 702,988 | $ | 2,025 | 1.15 | % | ||||||||||||
Net tax-equivalent yield on earning assets |
3.52 | % | 3.20 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | All interest earned is reported on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34% in 2010 and 2009. | |
(2) | Loan fees of $114,847 and $135,074 for 2010 and 2009, respectively, are included in these figures. | |
(3) | Includes nonaccrual loans. |
22
Table of Contents
Analysis of Average Balances, Interest Earned/Paid and Yield
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2009 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance |
Interest Earned/Paid |
Rate | Average Balance |
Interest Earned/Paid |
Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2)(3) |
$ | 450,712 | $ | 9,880 | 4.38 | % | $ | 471,986 | $ | 10,204 | 4.32 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold |
4,222 | 5 | 0.24 | % | 1,136 | 1 | 0.18 | % | ||||||||||||||||
HTM: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non taxable (1) |
3,113 | 80 | 5.14 | % | 3,329 | 89 | 5.35 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AFS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
267,586 | 5,457 | 4.08 | % | 317,464 | 6,338 | 3.99 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non taxable (1) |
40,353 | 941 | 4.66 | % | 33,033 | 839 | 5.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
5,131 | 8 | 0.31 | % | 2,636 | 7 | 0.53 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 771,117 | $ | 16,371 | 4.25 | % | $ | 829,584 | $ | 17,478 | 4.21 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings &
interest-bearing
DDA |
$ | 223,047 | $ | 578 | 0.52 | % | $ | 241,524 | $ | 1,236 | 1.02 | % | ||||||||||||
CDs |
187,331 | 1,089 | 1.16 | % | 196,453 | 1,717 | 1.75 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds
purchased |
163,178 | 563 | 0.69 | % | 228,985 | 1,094 | 0.96 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
63,552 | 246 | 0.77 | % | 22,652 | 272 | 2.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 637,108 | $ | 2,476 | 0.78 | % | $ | 689,614 | $ | 4,319 | 1.25 | % | ||||||||||||
Net tax-equivalent yield
on earning
assets |
3.60 | % | 3.17 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | All interest earned is reported on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34% in 2010 and 2009. | |
(2) | Loan fees of $315,602 and $287,216 for 2010 and 2009, respectively, are included in these figures. | |
(3) | Includes nonaccrual loans. |
23
Table of Contents
Provision for Loan Losses
In the normal course of business, the Company assumes risk in extending credit to its customers.
This credit risk is managed through compliance with the loan policy, which is approved by the
Board of Directors. The policy establishes guidelines relating to underwriting standards,
including but not limited to financial analysis, collateral valuation, lending limits, pricing
considerations and loan grading. A loan review process further assists with evaluating credit
quality and assessing potential performance issues. Loan delinquencies and deposit overdrafts are
closely monitored in order to identify developing problems as early as possible. In addition, the
Company continuously monitors its relationships with its loan customers in concentrated industries
such as gaming and hotel/motel, as well as the exposure for out of area, land, development,
construction and commercial real estate loans, and their direct and indirect impact on its
operations. A watch list of credits which pose a potential loss to the Company is prepared based
on the loan grading system. This list forms the foundation of the Companys allowance for loan
loss computation.
Management relies on its guidelines and existing methodology to monitor the performance of its loan
portfolio and identity and estimate potential losses based on the best available information. The
potential effect of the economic downturn on a national and local level, the decline in real estate
values and actual losses incurred by the Company were key factors in our analysis. The potential
direct and/or indirect impact of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico on the Company and its
customers was also considered. However, no potential losses as a result of the spill were
identified at June 30, 2010. The Companys on-going, systematic evaluation resulted in the Company
recording a provision for loan losses of $1,585,000 and $1,502,000 for the second quarters of 2010
and 2009, respectively, and $2,735,000 and $1,850,000 for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively.
The allowance for loan losses is an estimate, and as such, events may occur in the future which may
affect its accuracy. The Company anticipates that it is possible that additional information will
be gathered in future quarters which may require an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses.
Management will continue to closely monitor its portfolio and take such action as it deems
appropriate to accurately report its financial condition and results of operations.
Non-interest income
Total non-interest income increased $1,518,151 for the second quarter of 2010 as compared with the
second quarter of 2009. This increase was primarily the result of a gain on sales or calls or
securities of $1,563,441 in 2010 as compared with $2 in 2009 as the Company liquidated its entire
mortgage-backed securities portfolio and some of its short-term U.S. Treasuries during the second
quarter of 2010. Trust department income and fees decreased $42,809 for the second quarter of 2010
as compared with the second quarter of 2009 as a result of the decrease in market value, on which
fees are based, of personal trust accounts. Service charges on deposit accounts were impacted by
the local economy and resulted in the decrease in NSF fee income of $64,345 and the decrease in ATM
fees of $26,692. Other income increased $120,126 for the second quarter of 2010 as compared with
the second quarter of 2009. Other income for 2010 included a decrease in rental income of $26,267
as the Company lost one tenant who had occupied a large rental space in its Downtown Gulfport
branch. Other income for 2009 included a loss of $149,517 on the Companys investment in
24
Table of Contents
preferred stock of an unaffiliated bank holding company which was closed by the FDIC.
Total non-interest income increased $1,028,863 for the first half of 2010 as compared with the
first half of 2009, This increase was primarily the result of gains on sales or calls or securities
of $1,567,486 in 2010 as compared with $136,799 in 2009 as the Company liquidated its entire
mortgage-backed securities portfolio and some of its short-term U.S. Treasuries during the second
quarter of 2010. Trust department income and fees decreased $71,779 for the first half of 2010 as
compared with the first half of 2009 as a result of the decrease in market value, on which fees are
based, of personal trust accounts. Service charges on deposit accounts were impacted by the local
economy and resulted in the decrease in NSF fee income of $103 ,915 and the decrease in ATM fees of
$44,300. Other income increased $120,126 for the second quarter of 2010 as compared with the second
quarter of 2009. Other income for 2010 included a decrease in rental income of $26,268 as the
Company lost one tenant who had occupied a large rental space in its Downtown Gulfport branch.
Other income for 2009 included a loss of $149,517 on the Companys investment in preferred stock of
an unaffiliated bank holding company which was closed by the FDIC.
Non-interest expense
Total non-interest expense decreased $396,141 for the second quarter of 2010 as compared with the
second quarter of 2009. Salaries and employee benefits decreased $296,133 in 2010 as compared with
2009 as a result of the decrease in the number of employees as a result of attrition during 2009
and 2010. Included in the second quarter of 2010 was decreased occupancy expense of $97,121
relating primarily to decreased property and casualty insurance costs. FDIC regular assessments
have increased for 2010 as banks fund the replenishment of the bank insurance fund which was
depleted in recent years by bank closures. However, the Companys expense for the second quarter
of 2009 includes the special assessment of $420,000. Other expense increased $153,989 in 2010 as
compared with 2009 as a result of increased data processing charges, franchise tax expense and
loss and write downs on other real estate. For the second quarter of 2010, data processing charges
increased $56,367 over the second quarter of 2009 as a result of the outsourcing of the some of
the banks I/T functions. Franchise tax expense increased $114,985 for the second quarter of 2010
as compared with the second quarter of 2009 as prior years refunds were received in 2009. The
Company realized a loss of $26,350 during the second quarter of 2010 on the sale of other real
estate.
Total non-interest expense decreased $22,658 for the first half of 2010 as compared with the first
half of 2009. Salaries and employee benefits decreased $264,236 in 2010 as compared with 2009 as a
result of the decrease in the number of employees as a result of attrition during 2009 and 2010.
Included in the first half of 2010 was decreased occupancy expense of $124,205 relating primarily
to reduced property and casualty insurance costs. FDIC regular assessments have increased as banks
fund the replenishment of the bank insurance fund which was depleted in recent years by bank
closures resulting in an increase of $116,465 for the first half of 2010 as compared with the
first half of 2009. Other expense increased $267,109 for the first half of 2010 as compared with
the first half of 2009 as a result of increased accounting, data processing charges, franchise tax
expense and loss and write downs on other real estate and decreased consulting fees, trust expense
and training costs. For the first half of 2010, accounting fees increased $67,275 over the first
half of 2009 as a result of the outsourcing of the I/T audit function and the timing of external
audit fees. For the first half of
25
Table of Contents
2010, data processing charges increased $108,455 as compared with the first half of 2009 as a
result of the outsourcing of the some of the banks I/T functions. Franchise tax expense increased
$93,485 for the first half of 2010 as compared with the first half of 2009 as prior years refunds
were received in 2009. Expenses relating to other real estate increased $143,158 during the first
half of 2010 as compared with the first half of 2009 due to an
increased number of foreclosures.
Consulting fees decreased $37,954 for the first half of 2010 as compared with the first half of
2009 as 2009s results included costs associated with conducting a cost segregation study of our
fixed assets. Trust expense decreased $29,880 for the first half of 2010 as compared with the
first half of 2009 as the Company was able to reduce its monthly servicing fees for several months
in 2010 using soft dollar credits from its processing vendor. Training costs decreased
$27,363 for the first half of 2010 as compared with the first half of 2009 as the
Company reduced its budget for off-site conferences and seminars.
Income Taxes
Income taxes increased $572,000 for the second quarter of 2010 as compared with the second quarter
of 2009, and increased $457,000 for the first half of 2010 as compared with the first half of
2009. These increases were primarily the result of the overall increase in taxable earnings for
these time frames.
The effective tax rate was approximately 27% and (33%) for the quarters ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively, and was approximately 23% and 11% for the six months ended June 30, 2010 and
2009, respectively. Federal tax credits from a low income housing partnership, non-taxable income
from certain loans and investments as a component of total income and adjustment for prior
quarters over accrual of our tax liability contributed to these fluctuations.
FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Company decreased its investment in Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) stock to $3,370,800 as a
result of its decreased borrowing from FHLB.
Available
for sale securities increased $29,649,039 at June 30, 2010, compared with
December 31, 2009, as the bank subsidiarys liquidity position allowed. The Company sold its entire
mortgage-backed securities portfolio in 2010 and increased its investment in short-term U.S.
Treasury securities. The following schedule reflects the mix of available for sale securities at
June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009:
26
Table of Contents
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Available for sale securities: |
||||||||
U.S. Treasury |
$ | 63,091,080 | $ | 24,740,140 | ||||
U.S. Government agencies |
237,395,254 | 214,578,196 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
31,262,670 | |||||||
States and political subdivisions |
39,947,159 | 40,203,448 | ||||||
Equity securities |
649,983 | 649,983 | ||||||
Total available for sale securities |
$ | 341,083,476 | $ | 311,434,437 | ||||
Loans decreased $19,240,626 as a result of principal payments and maturities and the slower
volume of new loans, particularly in our real estate and commercial and industrial portfolio. The
Company anticipates that its loan portfolio will decline further in 2010. The composition of the
loan portfolio as of June 30, 2010 and December 31, 2009 was as follows:
June 30, 2010 | December 31, 2009 | |||||||
Real estate, construction |
$ | 91,183,386 | $ | 94,460,479 | ||||
Real estate, mortgage |
294,593,546 | 299,402,982 | ||||||
Loans to finance agricultural production |
1,754,796 | |||||||
Commercial and industrial loans |
45,994,996 | 52,250,231 | ||||||
Loans to individuals for household, family and
other consumer expenditures |
8,317,705 | 9,049,394 | ||||||
Obligations of states and political subdivisions |
5,141,529 | 7,890,584 | ||||||
All other loans |
504,503 | 167,825 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 445,735,665 | $ | 464,976,291 | ||||
Other real estate (ORE) decreased $124,400 at June 30, 2010, as compared with December 31,
2009 as sales of ORE have exceeded foreclosures.
The decrease in volume of interest-earning assets has directly impacted accrued interest
receivable, which decreased $625,954 during the first half of 2010.
Prepaid FDIC assessments decreased by $632,285 at June 30, 2010 as compared with December 31, 2009
as a result of the amortization of these costs.
Other assets increased $620,130 at June 30, 2010, as compared with December 31, 2009. This
increase is primarily attributable to the increase in prepaid expenses. Included in other assets
at June 30, 2010 is a deferred tax asset of $353,028, which the Company believes is more likely
than not that it will realize.
27
Table of Contents
Total deposits increased $48,853,659 at June 30, 2010, as compared with December 31, 2009.
Typically, significant increases or decreases in total deposits and/or significant fluctuations
among the different types of deposits from quarter to quarter are anticipated by Management as
customers in the casino industry and county and municipal entities reallocate their resources
periodically. During the first half of 2010, time deposits with a balance of $100,000 or more
increased $28,522,759 and include an increase in public fund time deposits of $41,685,625.
Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank decreased $50,454,285 at June 30,2010 as compared with
December 31, 2009 based on the liquidity needs of the bank subsidiary.
Other
liabilities increased $21,417,493 at June 30, 2010 as compared
with December 31, 2009 due to
the acquisition of securities of $19,996,623 which had not settled by June 30, 2010.
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND CAPITAL ADEQUACY
Strength, security and stability have been the hallmark of the Company since its founding in 1985
and of its bank subsidiary since its founding in 1896. A strong capital foundation is fundamental
to the continuing prosperity of the Company and the security of its customers and shareholders.
One measure of capital adequacy is the primary capital ratio which
was 13.07% at June 30, 2010,
which is well above the regulatory minimum of 6.00%. Management continues to emphasize the
importance of maintaining the appropriate capital levels of the Company and has established the
goal of maintaining its primary capital ratio at 8.00%, which is the minimum requirement for
classification as being well-capitalized by the banking regulatory authorities.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity represents the Companys ability to adequately provide funds to satisfy demands from
depositors, borrowers and other commitments by either converting assets to cash or accessing new or
existing sources of funds. Management monitors these funds requirements in such a manner as to
satisfy these demands and provide the maximum earnings on its earning assets. The Company utilizes
various tools to project its liquidity needs and performs analyses to determine the accuracy of
those projections as well as to anticipate and plan for liquidity risk scenarios.
Deposits, payments of principal and interest on loans, proceeds from maturities, sales and calls of
investment securities and earnings on investment securities are the principal sources of funds for
the Company.
Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank, federal funds sold and federal funds purchased are also
utilized by the Company to manage its daily liquidity position. The Company may also utilize the
Federal Reserve Bank Discount Window Primary Credit Program as a source of liquidity, if
necessary.
28
Table of Contents
REGULATORY MATTERS
During 2009, Management identified opportunities for improving risk management, addressing asset
quality concerns, managing concentrations of credit risk and ensuring sufficient liquidity at the
Bank as a result of its own investigation as well as examinations performed by certain bank
regulatory agencies. In concert with the regulators, the Company identified specific corrective
steps and actions to enhance its risk management, asset quality and liquidity policies, controls
and procedures. The Company and the Bank may not declare or pay any cash dividends without the
prior written approval of their regulators.
The
Company has been an accelerated filer since December 31, 2005. Based on the decrease of its
market capitalization to $43,604,128 at June 30, 2010, the
Company will become a non-accelerated
filer on December 31, 2010.
In
July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the Act)
was passed by the Congress. The Act increases the supervisory authority of the Federal Reserve
Board, creates a new Financial Services Oversight Council, creates a new process to liquidate
failed financial firms, creates an independent Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection, implements
comprehensive regulation of over-the-counter derivatives, establishes a Federal Insurance Office
and increases the transparency and accountability for credit rating agencies. The Act requires
more than 60 studies to be conducted and more than 200 regulations to be written over the next one
to two years. The true impact of the legislation on the Company will be unknown until these are
complete.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
As of June
30, 2010, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)). Based on that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required
to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period ended June 30, 2010 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
29
Table of Contents
PART II OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
The bank is involved in various legal matters and claims which are being defended and handled in
the ordinary course of business. None of these matters is expected, in the opinion of Management,
to have a material adverse effect upon the financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
Item 6 Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit 10.1:
|
Description of Bonus Plan | |
Exhibit 31.1:
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 31.2:
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 | |
Exhibit 32.1:
|
Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to l8 U.S.C. ss. 1350 | |
Exhibit 32.2:
|
Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to l8 U.S.C. ss. 1350 |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
A Form 8-K
was filed on April 16, 2010, April 21, 2010, June 23,
2010 and July 28, 2010.
30
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION (Registrant) Date: August 9, 2010 |
||||
By: | /s/ Chevis C. Swetman | |||
Chevis C. Swetman | ||||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer) | ||||
Date: August 9, 2010 |
||||
By: | /s/ Lauri A. Wood | |||
Lauri A. Wood | ||||
Chief Financial Officer and Controller (principal financial and accounting officer) |
31