PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORP /MS/ - Quarter Report: 2011 June (Form 10-Q)
Table of Contents
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-Q
[X] QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 or 15 (D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the quarterly period ended | June 30, 2011 |
or
[ ] TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
Commission File Number | 001-12103 |
PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Mississippi | 64-0709834 | |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) | |
Lameuse and Howard Avenues, Biloxi, Mississippi | 39533 | |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
(228) 435-5511
(Registrants telephone number, including area code)
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed
by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or
for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been
subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its
corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted
pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period
that the registrant was required to submit and post such files.) Yes X No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a
non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of large accelerated
filer, accelerated filer and smaller reporting company in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
(Check one):
Large accelerated filer | Accelerated filer | Non-accelerated filer | Smaller reporting company X | |||
Do not check if a smaller reporting company |
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of
the Exchange Act). Yes No X
Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuers classes of common stock, as of
the last practicable date. Peoples Financial Corporation has only one class of common stock
authorized. At July 29, 2011, there were 15,000,000 shares of $1 par value common stock
authorized, with 5,136,918 shares issued and outstanding.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Table of Contents
Part 1 Financial Information
Item 1: Financial Statements |
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Condition
Consolidated Statements of Condition
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
Assets |
||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 45,605,429 | $ | 24,146,939 | ||||
Available for sale securities |
319,529,536 | 287,078,463 | ||||||
Held to maturity securities, fair value of $2,006,142 at June 30, 2011;
$2,010,430 at December 31, 2010 |
1,916,323 | 1,914,879 | ||||||
Other investments |
3,843,455 | 3,926,371 | ||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock, at cost |
2,153,000 | 2,281,200 | ||||||
Loans |
393,389,744 | 409,898,757 | ||||||
Less: Allowance for loan losses |
6,713,484 | 6,650,258 | ||||||
Loans, net |
386,676,260 | 403,248,499 | ||||||
Bank premises and equipment, net
of accumulated depreciation |
28,853,143 | 29,756,239 | ||||||
Other real estate |
8,163,237 | 5,744,150 | ||||||
Accrued interest receivable |
3,532,014 | 3,292,430 | ||||||
Cash surrender value of life insurance |
16,076,138 | 15,951,117 | ||||||
Prepaid FDIC assessments |
2,898,420 | 3,652,972 | ||||||
Other assets |
1,968,018 | 5,552,225 | ||||||
Total assets |
$ | 821,214,973 | $ | 786,545,484 | ||||
2
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Condition (continued)
Consolidated Statements of Condition (continued)
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
(Unaudited) | (Audited) | |||||||
Liabilities & Shareholders Equity | ||||||||
Liabilities: |
||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||
Demand, non-interest bearing |
$ | 109,784,048 | $ | 108,277,985 | ||||
Savings and demand, interest bearing |
217,789,641 | 193,631,209 | ||||||
Time, $100,000 or more |
124,242,102 | 134,667,660 | ||||||
Other time deposits |
46,603,645 | 47,562,661 | ||||||
Total deposits |
498,419,436 | 484,139,515 | ||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under
agreements to repurchase |
169,044,469 | 140,102,019 | ||||||
Borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank |
28,955,873 | 42,957,016 | ||||||
Other liabilities |
18,547,716 | 17,990,072 | ||||||
Total liabilities |
714,967,494 | 685,188,622 | ||||||
Shareholders Equity: |
||||||||
Common stock, $1 par value, 15,000,000 shares
authorized, 5,136,918 and 5,151,139 shares issued and
outstanding at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 |
5,136,918 | 5,151,139 | ||||||
Surplus |
65,780,254 | 65,780,254 | ||||||
Undivided profits |
33,909,136 | 33,302,381 | ||||||
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss),
net of tax |
1,421,171 | (2,876,912 | ) | |||||
Total shareholders equity |
106,247,479 | 101,356,862 | ||||||
Total liabilities & shareholders equity |
$ | 821,214,973 | $ | 786,545,484 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
3
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Income
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Interest and fees on loans |
$ | 4,381,186 | $ | 4,893,342 | $ | 9,287,948 | $ | 9,880,468 | ||||||||
Interest and dividends on securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries |
63,266 | 131,216 | 127,129 | 325,478 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
1,711,696 | 2,312,723 | 3,151,058 | 4,612,426 | ||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
30,957 | 132,048 | 30,957 | 518,924 | ||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
360,357 | 316,668 | 729,458 | 673,597 | ||||||||||||
Other investments |
2,421 | 3,203 | 8,639 | 7,654 | ||||||||||||
Interest on federal funds sold |
3,386 | 1,557 | 4,738 | 5,336 | ||||||||||||
Total interest income |
6,553,269 | 7,790,757 | 13,339,927 | 16,023,883 | ||||||||||||
Interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits |
651,406 | 849,297 | 1,354,117 | 1,666,786 | ||||||||||||
Long-term borrowings |
45,402 | 109,559 | 95,467 | 246,204 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase |
169,545 | 276,351 | 341,568 | 562,741 | ||||||||||||
Total interest expense |
866,353 | 1,235,207 | 1,791,152 | 2,475,731 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income |
5,686,916 | 6,555,550 | 11,548,775 | 13,548,152 | ||||||||||||
Provision for allowance for losses
on loans |
546,000 | 1,585,000 | 1,187,000 | 2,735,000 | ||||||||||||
Net interest income after provision
for allowance for losses on loans |
$ | 5,140,916 | $ | 4,970,550 | $ | 10,361,775 | $ | 10,813,152 | ||||||||
4
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Income (continued)
(Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Income (continued)
(Unaudited)
Three Months Ended June 30, | Six Months Ended June 30, | |||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | 2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||
Non-interest income: |
||||||||||||||||
Trust department income and fees |
$ | 323,468 | $ | 282,941 | $ | 669,923 | $ | 590,237 | ||||||||
Service charges on deposit accounts |
1,455,146 | 1,579,485 | 2,874,174 | 3,151,988 | ||||||||||||
Gain on sales or calls of securities |
7,174 | 1,563,441 | 7,174 | 1,567,486 | ||||||||||||
Increase in cash surrender value |
125,380 | 126,344 | 257,680 | 255,944 | ||||||||||||
Gain from redemption of life insurance |
389,119 | 389,119 | ||||||||||||||
Other income |
151,035 | 132,316 | 276,162 | 252,005 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest income |
2,451,322 | 3,684,527 | 4,474,232 | 5,817,660 | ||||||||||||
Non-interest expense: |
||||||||||||||||
Salaries and employee benefits |
3,395,090 | 3,398,188 | 6,771,387 | 6,810,463 | ||||||||||||
Net occupancy |
655,236 | 544,121 | 1,269,170 | 1,068,898 | ||||||||||||
Equipment rentals, depreciation and maintenance |
951,812 | 951,312 | 1,822,212 | 1,886,765 | ||||||||||||
FDIC assessments |
437,086 | 390,517 | 842,912 | 740,904 | ||||||||||||
Other expense |
1,535,141 | 1,402,857 | 3,224,909 | 3,109,245 | ||||||||||||
Total non-interest expense |
6,974,365 | 6,686,995 | 13,930,590 | 13,616,275 | ||||||||||||
Income before income taxes |
617,873 | 1,968,082 | 905,417 | 3,014,537 | ||||||||||||
Income tax expense (benefit) |
(192,000 | ) | 522,000 | (342,000 | ) | 697,000 | ||||||||||
Net income |
$ | 809,873 | $ | 1,446,082 | $ | 1,247,417 | $ | 2,317,537 | ||||||||
Basic and diluted earnings per share |
$ | .16 | $ | .28 | $ | .24 | $ | .45 | ||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
5
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income
Accumulated | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of | Other | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common | Common | Undivided | Comprehensive | Comprehensive | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares | Stock | Surplus | Profits | Income (Loss) | Income | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1,
2011 |
5,151,139 | $ | 5,151,139 | $ | 65,780,254 | $ | 33,302,381 | $ | (2,876,912 | ) | $ | 101,356,862 | ||||||||||||||||
Comprehensive
income: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net income |
1,247,417 | $ | 1,247,417 | 1,247,417 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Net unrealized gain
on available for
sale securities,
net of tax |
4,302,818 | 4,302,818 | 4,302,818 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Reclassification
adjustment for
available for sale
securities called
or sold in current year, net of tax |
(4,735 | ) | (4,735 | ) | (4,735 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Total comprehensive income |
$ | 5,545,500 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Dividend declared
($.09 per share) |
(462,323 | ) | (462,323 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Retirement
of stock |
(14,221 | ) | (14,221 | ) | (178,339 | ) | (192,560 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Balance,
June 30, 2011 |
5,136,918 | $ | 5,136,918 | $ | 65,780,254 | $ | 33,909,136 | $ | 1,421,171 | $ | 106,247,479 | |||||||||||||||||
Note: Balances as of January 1, 2011 were audited.
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
6
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (Unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: |
||||||||
Net income |
$ | 1,247,417 | $ | 2,317,537 | ||||
Adjustment to reconcile net income to net cash
provided by operating activities: |
||||||||
Depreciation |
1,176,000 | 1,218,000 | ||||||
Provision for allowance for loan losses |
1,187,000 | 2,735,000 | ||||||
Loss on writedown of other real estate |
124,606 | 77,350 | ||||||
Loss on sales of other real estate |
25,291 | 39,350 | ||||||
Loss on other investments |
82,916 | 15,550 | ||||||
Gain on sales and calls of securities |
(7,174 | ) | (1,567,486 | ) | ||||
Accretion of held to maturity securities |
(1,444 | ) | (1,413 | ) | ||||
Change in accrued interest receivable |
(239,584 | ) | 625,954 | |||||
Change in other assets |
2,605,373 | 15,556 | ||||||
Change in other liabilities |
80,850 | 20,596,976 | ||||||
Net cash provided by operating activities |
$ | 6,281,251 | $ | 26,072,374 | ||||
7
Table of Contents
Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued) (unaudited)
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows (continued) (unaudited)
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||
Cash flows from investing activities: |
||||||||
Proceeds from maturities, sales and calls of
available for sale securities |
$ | 78,710,848 | $ | 147,206,124 | ||||
Investment in available for sale securities |
(104,646,484 | ) | (173,037,295 | ) | ||||
Proceeds from maturities of held to maturity securities |
389,920 | |||||||
Redemption of Federal Home Loan Bank Stock |
128,200 | 1,645,100 | ||||||
Proceeds from sales of other real estate |
358,526 | 807,500 | ||||||
Loans, net change |
12,457,729 | 17,045,947 | ||||||
Acquisition of premises and equipment |
(272,904 | ) | (172,932 | ) | ||||
Investment in other assets |
(125,021 | ) | (325,325 | ) | ||||
Net cash used in investing activities |
(13,389,106 | ) | (6,440,961 | ) | ||||
Cash flows from financing activities: |
||||||||
Demand and savings deposits, net change |
25,664,495 | 20,461,290 | ||||||
Time deposits made, net change |
(11,384,574 | ) | 28,392,369 | |||||
Cash dividends |
(462,323 | ) | (515,170 | ) | ||||
Retirement of common stock |
(192,560 | ) | ||||||
Borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank |
330,002,395 | 390,669,662 | ||||||
Repayments to Federal Home Loan Bank |
(344,003,538 | ) | (441,123,947 | ) | ||||
Federal funds purchased and securities sold
under agreements to repurchase, net change |
28,942,450 | (3,558,614 | ) | |||||
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities |
28,566,345 | (5,674,410 | ) | |||||
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents |
21,458,490 | 13,957,003 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
24,146,939 | 29,155,294 | ||||||
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ | 45,605,429 | $ | 43,112,297 | ||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
8
Table of Contents
PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
NOTES TO UNAUDITED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 and 2010
1. Basis of Presentation:
Peoples Financial Corporation (the Company) is a one-bank holding company headquartered in
Biloxi, Mississippi. Its two operating subsidiaries are The Peoples Bank, Biloxi, Mississippi (the
Bank), and PFC Service Corp. Its principal subsidiary is The Peoples Bank, Biloxi, Mississippi,
which provides a full range of banking, financial and trust services to state, county and local
government entities and individuals and small and commercial businesses operating in Harrison,
Hancock, Stone and Jackson counties.
The accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements and notes thereto contain all
adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments, necessary to present fairly, in
accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (GAAP),
the financial position of the Company and its subsidiaries as of June 30, 2011 and the results of
their operations and their cash flows for the periods presented. The interim financial information
should be read in conjunction with the annual consolidated financial statements and the notes
thereto included in the Companys 2010 Annual Report and Form 10-K.
The results of operations for the six months ended June 30, 2011, are not necessarily indicative of
the results to be expected for the full year.
Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and
liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated
financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported period.
Actual results could differ from those estimates.
Summary of Significant Accounting Policies - The accounting and reporting policies of the Company
conform with GAAP and general practices within the banking industry. There have been no material
changes or developments in the application of principles or in our evaluation of the accounting
estimates and the underlying assumptions or methodologies that we believe to be Critical Accounting
Policies as disclosed in our Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
2. Earnings Per Share:
Per share data is based on the weighted average shares of common stock outstanding of 5,136,918 and
5,151,697 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, and 5,136,918 and
5,151,697 for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively.
3. Statements of Cash Flows:
The Company has defined cash and cash equivalents as cash and due from banks. The Company paid
$1,811,218 and $2,475,536 for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively, for
interest on deposits and borrowings. Income tax payments of $235,000 and $625,000 were made
9
Table of Contents
during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, respectively. Loans transferred to other real
estate amounted to $2,927,510 and $799,800 during the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010,
respectively. Dividends payable of $462,323 as of December 31, 2010 were paid during the six
months ended June 30, 2011.
4. Investments:
The amortized cost and fair value of securities at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are as
follows:
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 | Amortized Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Available for sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries |
$ | 16,961,812 | $ | 129,805 | $ | (4,428 | ) | $ | 17,087,189 | |||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
256,404,465 | 2,564,060 | (377,975 | ) | 258,590,550 | |||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
4,879,688 | 92,224 | 4,971,912 | |||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
36,872,481 | 1,359,439 | (2,018 | ) | 38,229,902 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities |
315,118,446 | 4,145,528 | (384,421 | ) | 318,879,553 | |||||||||||
Equity securities |
649,983 | 649,983 | ||||||||||||||
Total available for sale securities |
$ | 315,768,429 | $ | 4,145,528 | $ | (384,421 | ) | $ | 319,529,536 | |||||||
Held to maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 1,916,323 | $ | 89,819 | $ | $ | $2,006,142 | |||||||||
Total held to maturity securities |
$ | 1,916,323 | $ | 89,819 | $ | $ | 2,006,142 | |||||||||
10
Table of Contents
Gross | Gross | |||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | |||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010 | Amortized Cost | Gains | Losses | Fair Value | ||||||||||||
Available for sale securities: |
||||||||||||||||
Debt securities: |
||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries |
$ | 26,957,061 | $ | 51,729 | $ | (499,819 | ) | $ | 26,508,971 | |||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
221,639,699 | 1,055,500 | (4,099,256 | ) | 218,595,943 | |||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
40,578,877 | 1,114,322 | (369,633 | ) | 41,323,566 | |||||||||||
Total debt securities |
289,175,637 | 2,221,551 | (4,968,708 | ) | 286,428,480 | |||||||||||
Equity securities |
649,983 | 649,983 | ||||||||||||||
Total available for sale securities |
$ | 289,825,620 | $ | 2,221,551 | $ | (4,968,708 | ) | $ | 287,078,463 | |||||||
Held to maturity securities: |
||||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
$ | 1,914,879 | $ | 95,551 | $ | $ | 2,010,430 | |||||||||
Total held to maturity securities |
$ | 1,914,879 | $ | 95,551 | $ | $ | 2,010,430 | |||||||||
The amortized cost and fair value of debt securities at June 30, 2011, by contractual
maturity, are shown below. Expected maturities will differ from contractual maturities because
borrowers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without call or prepayment
penalties.
Amortized Cost | Fair Value | |||||||
Available for sale securities: |
||||||||
Due in one year or less |
$ | 2,055,295 | $ | 2,094,894 | ||||
Due after one year through five years |
81,172,973 | 82,366,068 | ||||||
Due after five years through ten years |
144,730,325 | 146,645,370 | ||||||
Due after ten years |
82,280,165 | 82,801,309 | ||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
4,879,688 | 4,971,912 | ||||||
Totals |
$ | 315,118,446 | $ | 318,879,553 | ||||
Held to maturity securities: |
||||||||
Due after one year through five years |
$ | 1,451,901 | $ | 1,524,683 | ||||
Due after five years through ten years |
464,422 | 481,459 | ||||||
Totals |
$ | 1,916,323 | $ | 2,006,142 | ||||
11
Table of Contents
Securities with gross unrealized losses at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, aggregated by
investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous loss
position are as follows:
Less Than Twelve Months | Over Twelve Months | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Gross | Gross | Gross | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Unrealized | Unrealized | Unrealized | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011: | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | Fair Value | Losses | ||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries |
$ | 1,001,640 | $ | 4,428 | $ | $ | $ | 1,001,640 | $ | 4,428 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Government
agencies |
49,538,250 | 377,975 | 49,538,250 | 377,975 | ||||||||||||||||||||
States and political
subdivisions |
321,155 | 2,018 | 321,155 | 2,018 | ||||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
$ | 50,861,045 | $ | 384,421 | $ | $ | $ | 50,861,045 | $ | 384,421 | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries |
$ | 15,457,980 | $ | 499,819 | $ | $ | $ | 15,457,980 | $ | 499,819 | ||||||||||||||
U.S. Government
agencies |
138,075,993 | 4,099,256 | 138,075,993 | 4,099,256 | ||||||||||||||||||||
States and political
subdivisions |
5,295,359 | 172,435 | 2,028,616 | 197,198 | 7,323,975 | 369,633 | ||||||||||||||||||
TOTAL |
$ | 158,829,332 | $ | 4,771,510 | $ | 2,028,616 | $ | 197,198 | $ | 160,857,948 | $ | 4,968,708 | ||||||||||||
Management evaluates securities for other-than-temporary impairment on a monthly basis. In
performing this evaluation, the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less
than cost, the fact that the Companys securities are primarily issued by U.S. Treasury and U.S.
Government Agencies and the cause of the decline in value are considered. In addition, the Company
does not intend to sell and it is not more likely than not that it will be required to sell these
securities before maturity. While some available for sale securities have been sold for liquidity
purposes or for gains, the Company has traditionally held its securities, including those
classified as available for sale, until maturity. As a result of the evaluation of these
securities, the Company has determined that the unrealized losses summarized in the tables above
are not deemed to be other-than-temporary.
12
Table of Contents
5. Loans:
The composition of the loan portfolio at June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, is as follows:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Gaming |
$ | 44,909,921 | $ | 44,342,798 | ||||
Residential and land development |
29,123,815 | 30,063,593 | ||||||
Real estate, construction |
62,008,715 | 60,982,989 | ||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
220,177,439 | 222,578,080 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
24,463,860 | 36,463,500 | ||||||
Other |
12,705,994 | 15,467,797 | ||||||
Total |
$ | 393,389,744 | $ | 409,898,757 | ||||
The age analysis of the loan portfolio, segregated by class of loans, as of June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, is as follows:
Loans Past | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Number of Days Past Due | Due Greater | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Greater | Total | Total | Than 90 Days | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
30 - 59 | 60 - 89 | Than 90 | Past Due | Current | Loans | & Still Accruing | ||||||||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gaming |
$ | $ | $ | 275,165 | $ | 275,165 | $ | 44,634,756 | $ | 44,909,921 | $ | 275,165 | ||||||||||||||||
Residential and
land development |
15,819,820 | 15,819,820 | 13,303,995 | 29,123,815 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate, construction |
4,348,383 | 473,891 | 762,625 | 5,584,899 | 56,423,816 | 62,008,715 | 762,624 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
5,234,786 | 6,727,950 | 812,286 | 12,775,022 | 207,402,417 | 220,177,439 | 32,420 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
1,604,289 | 24,701 | 123,856 | 1,752,846 | 22,711,014 | 24,463,860 | 123,856 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
394,430 | 58,810 | 818 | 454,058 | 12,251,936 | 12,705,994 | 817 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 11,581,888 | $ | 7,285,352 | $ | 17,794,570 | $ | 36,661,810 | $ | 356,727,934 | $ | 393,389,744 | $ | 1,194,882 | ||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gaming |
$ | $ | $ | 2,808,409 | $ | 2,808,409 | $ | 41,534,389 | $ | 44,342,798 | $ | |||||||||||||||||
Residential and
land development |
2,281,675 | 2,317,327 | 4,599,002 | 25,464,591 | 30,063,593 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate, construction |
8,041,900 | 4,433,125 | 4,373,103 | 16,848,128 | 44,134,861 | 60,982,989 | 1,990,772 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
18,479,501 | 4,639,802 | 5,139,974 | 28,259,277 | 194,318,803 | 222,578,080 | 955,715 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
1,558,356 | 98,328 | 41,181 | 1,697,865 | 34,765,635 | 36,463,500 | 14,099 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Other |
273,940 | 33,544 | 969 | 308,453 | 15,159,344 | 15,467,797 | 969 | |||||||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 30,635,372 | $ | 9,204,799 | $ | 14,680,963 | $ | 54,521,134 | $ | 355,377,623 | $ | 409,898,757 | $ | 2,961,555 | ||||||||||||||
13
Table of Contents
The Company monitors the credit quality of its loan portfolio through the use of a loan
grading system. A score of 1 5 is assigned to the loan based on factors including repayment
ability, trends in net worth and/or financial condition of the borrower and guarantors, employment
stability, management ability, loan to value fluctuations, the type and structure of the loan,
conformity of the loan to bank policy and payment performance. Based on the total score, a loan
grade of A - F is applied. A grade of A will generally be applied to loans for customers that are
well known to the Company and that have excellent sources of repayment. A grade of B will
generally be applied to loans for customers that have excellent sources of repayment which have no
identifiable risk of collection. A grade of C will generally be applied to loans for customers
that have adequate sources of repayment which have little identifiable risk of collection. Loans
with a grade of C may be placed on the watch list if weaknesses are not resolved which could result
in potential loss. A grade of D will generally be applied to loans for customers that are
inadequately protected by current sound net worth, paying capacity of the borrower, or pledged
collateral. Loans with a grade of D have unsatisfactory characteristics such as cash flow
deficiencies, bankruptcy filing by the borrower or dependence on the sale of collateral for the
primary source of repayment, causing more than acceptable levels of risk. Loans 60 to 89 days past
due receive a grade of D. A grade of E will generally be applied to loans for customers with
weaknesses inherent in the D classification and in which collection or liquidation in full is
questionable. All loans 90 days or more past due are rated E. A grade of F is applied to loans
which are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuance in an active
bank is not warranted. Loans with this grade are charged off, even though partial or full recovery
may be possible in the future. All loans 180 days or more past due are rated F and charged off
unless the Bank is in the process of collection.
An analysis of the loan portfolio by loan grade, segregated by class of loans, as of June 30, 2011
and December 31, 2010, is as follows:
14
Table of Contents
Loans With A Grade Of: | ||||||||||||||||||||
A or B | C | D | E | Total | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gaming |
$ | 29,181,795 | $ | $ | $ | 15,728,126 | $ | 44,909,921 | ||||||||||||
Residential and land
development |
5,012,773 | 4,220,000 | 19,258,722 | 632,320 | 29,123,815 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate, construction |
52,101,038 | 73,594 | 9,640,556 | 193,527 | 62,008,715 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
181,993,752 | 5,792,770 | 29,939,922 | 2,450,995 | 220,177,439 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
15,697,642 | 299,048 | 8,262,406 | 204,764 | 24,463,860 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
12,372,826 | 38,145 | 289,718 | 5,305 | 12,705,994 | |||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 296,359,826 | $ | 10,423,557 | $ | 67,391,324 | $ | 19,215,037 | $ | 393,389,744 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||
Gaming |
$ | 27,397,218 | $ | $ | 6,413,068 | $ | 10,532,512 | $ | 44,342,798 | |||||||||||
Residential and land
development |
25,664,590 | 864,342 | 3,102,340 | 432,321 | 30,063,593 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate, construction |
52,417,942 | 314,806 | 7,715,653 | 534,588 | 60,982,989 | |||||||||||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
184,963,841 | 8,247,627 | 25,669,185 | 3,697,427 | 222,578,080 | |||||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
33,702,021 | 289,222 | 2,323,291 | 148,966 | 36,463,500 | |||||||||||||||
Other |
15,232,311 | 39,865 | 195,621 | 15,467,797 | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 339,377,923 | $ | 9,755,862 | $ | 45,419,158 | $ | 15,345,814 | $ | 409,898,757 | ||||||||||
15
Table of Contents
Total loans on nonaccrual as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are as follows:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Gaming |
$ | 15,728,126 | $ | 10,221,662 | ||||
Residential and land development |
15,819,821 | 632,321 | ||||||
Real estate, construction |
386,557 | |||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
1,014,036 | 3,268,778 | ||||||
Commercial and industrial |
27,081 | |||||||
Other |
698 | |||||||
Total |
$ | 32,561,983 | $ | 14,537,097 | ||||
The Company has modified certain loans by granting interest rate concessions to these
customers. These loans are classified as troubled debt restructurings. These loans are all in
compliance with their modified terms and are currently accruing. Troubled debt restructurings as of
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Pre-Modification | Post-Modification | |||||||||||||||
Number | Outstanding | Outstanding | ||||||||||||||
of | Recorded | Recorded | Related | |||||||||||||
Contracts | Investment | Investment | Allowance | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate, construction |
1 | $ | 183,607 | $ | 183,607 | $ | 112,000 | |||||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
2 | 8,874,063 | 8,874,063 | 498,000 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
1 | 708,352 | 708,352 | |||||||||||||
4 | $ | 9,766,022 | $ | 9,766,022 | $ | 610,000 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Real estate, construction |
1 | $ | 186,831 | $ | 186,831 | $ | 116,000 | |||||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
1 | 515,663 | 515,663 | 110,000 | ||||||||||||
2 | $ | 702,494 | $ | 702,494 | $ | 226,000 | ||||||||||
16
Table of Contents
Impaired loans, segregated by class of loans, as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are
as follows:
Unpaid | Average | |||||||||||||||
Principal | Recorded | Related | Recorded | |||||||||||||
Balance | Investment | Allowance | Investment | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||
Gaming |
$ | 15,728,125 | $ | 15,728,126 | $ | $ | 10,116,646 | |||||||||
Residential and land development |
19,500,599 | 15,819,821 | 632,321 | |||||||||||||
Real estate, construction |
183,607 | 183,607 | 112,000 | 185,120 | ||||||||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
10,818,096 | 9,888,099 | 935,201 | 1,207,129 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
708,352 | 708,352 | 3,935 | |||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 46,938,779 | $ | 42,328,005 | $ | 1,047,201 | $ | 12,145,151 | ||||||||
December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Gaming |
$ | 10,532,512 | $ | 10,221,662 | $ | 107,328 | $ | 9,363,015 | ||||||||
Residential and land development |
4,313,098 | 632,321 | 8,220 | 2,692,751 | ||||||||||||
Real estate, construction |
573,388 | 573,388 | 179,000 | 199,531 | ||||||||||||
Real estate, mortgage |
4,762,356 | 3,784,441 | 649,392 | 2,366,888 | ||||||||||||
Commercial and industrial |
27,081 | 27,081 | 195 | 8,065 | ||||||||||||
Other |
698 | 698 | 698 | 590 | ||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 20,209,133 | $ | 15,239,591 | $ | 944,833 | $ | 14,630,840 | ||||||||
No material interest income was recognized on impaired loans for the six months ended June 30,
2011 and the year ended December 31, 2010.
6. Allowance for Loan Losses:
Transactions in the allowance for loan losses for the quarters and six months ended June 30, 2011
and 2010, and the balances of loans, individually and collectively evaluated for impairment as of
June 30, 2011 and 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
17
Table of Contents
Residential | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Land | Real Estate, | Real Estate, | Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gaming | Development | Construction | Mortgage | and Industrial | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the six months ended
June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 466 | $ | 1,069 | $ | 1,020 | $ | 3,413 | $ | 480 | $ | 202 | $ | 6,650 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(212 | ) | (956 | ) | (46 | ) | (102 | ) | (1,316 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries |
35 | 32 | 46 | 16 | 63 | 192 | ||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision |
(249 | ) | (572 | ) | 226 | 1,638 | 40 | 104 | 1,187 | |||||||||||||||||||
Ending
Balance |
$ | 252 | $ | 529 | $ | 1,034 | $ | 4,141 | $ | 490 | $ | 267 | $ | 6,713 | ||||||||||||||
For the
quarter ended
June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 233 | $ | 613 | $ | 1,260 | $ | 4,217 | $ | 692 | $ | 90 | $ | 7,105 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(212 | ) | (708 | ) | (25 | ) | (72 | ) | (1,017 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries |
35 | 3 | 41 | 79 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision |
(16 | ) | (84 | ) | (14 | ) | 632 | (180 | ) | 208 | 546 | |||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 252 | $ | 529 | $ | 1,034 | $ | 4,141 | $ | 490 | $ | 267 | $ | 6,713 | ||||||||||||||
Allowance
For Loan Losses, June 30, 2011:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance: individually
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | $ | $ | 250 | $ | 1,754 | $ | 302 | $ | 53 | $ | 2,359 | ||||||||||||||||
Ending
Balance: collectively evaluated for impairment |
$ | 252 | $ | 529 | $ | 784 | $ | 2,387 | $ | 188 | $ | 214 | $ | 4,354 | ||||||||||||||
Total Loans, June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance: individually
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 22,303 | $ | 19,891 | $ | 9,834 | $ | 32,391 | $ | 1,892 | $ | 295 | $ | 86,606 | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance: collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 22,607 | $ | 9,233 | $ | 52,175 | $ | 187,786 | $ | 22,571 | $ | 12,411 | $ | 306,783 | ||||||||||||||
18
Table of Contents
Residential | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
and Land | Real Estate, | Real Estate, | Commercial | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Gaming | Development | Construction | Mortgage | and Industrial | Other | Total | ||||||||||||||||||||||
For the six months ended
June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 699 | $ | 1,198 | $ | 1,019 | $ | 3,549 | $ | 1,293 | $ | 70 | $ | 7,828 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(562 | ) | (785 | ) | (122 | ) | (1,469 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries |
11 | 63 | 74 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision |
297 | 1,442 | 75 | 1,439 | (606 | ) | 88 | 2,735 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 996 | $ | 2,640 | $ | 532 | $ | 4,203 | $ | 698 | $ | 99 | $ | 9,168 | ||||||||||||||
For the
quarter ended
June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan Losses: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Beginning Balance |
$ | 901 | $ | 1,844 | $ | 525 | $ | 4,208 | $ | 585 | $ | 216 | $ | 8,279 | ||||||||||||||
Charge-offs |
(11 | ) | (663 | ) | (40 | ) | (714 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||
Recoveries |
1 | 17 | 18 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
Provision |
95 | 796 | 18 | 658 | 112 | (94 | ) | 1,585 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Ending Balance |
$ | 996 | $ | 2,640 | $ | 532 | $ | 4,203 | $ | 698 | $ | 99 | $ | 9,168 | ||||||||||||||
Allowance for Loan
Losses, June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance:
individually
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 337 | $ | 1,309 | $ | 467 | $ | 1,625 | $ | 399 | $ | 5 | $ | 4,142 | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 659 | $ | 1,331 | $ | 65 | $ | 2,578 | $ | 299 | $ | 94 | $ | 5,026 | ||||||||||||||
Total Loans, June 30, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Ending balance:
individually
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 2,808 | $ | 5,664 | $ | 2,308 | $ | 8,263 | $ | 1,240 | $ | 13 | $ | 20,296 | ||||||||||||||
Ending balance:
collectively
evaluated for
impairment |
$ | 62,828 | $ | 35,195 | $ | 48,016 | $ | 220,999 | $ | 44,450 | $ | 13,952 | $ | 425,440 | ||||||||||||||
7. Deposits:
At June 30, 2011, time deposits of $100,000 or more include brokered deposits of $22,696,000 which
mature in 2012.
8. Shareholders Equity:
On June 29, 2011, the Board of Directors declared a semi-annual dividend of $.09 per share with a
record date of July 13, 2011 and a payment date of July 20, 2011.
9. Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss):
At June 30, 2011, accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) included the unrealized gain on
available for sale securities of $2,493,616, net of tax of $1,267,491, and the loss from the
unfunded post-retirement benefit obligation of $1,072,445, net of tax of $552,471.
19
Table of Contents
10. Fair Value of Financial Instruments:
The Company reports certain assets and liabilities at their estimated fair value. These assets and
liabilities are classified and disclosed in one of three categories based on the inputs used to
develop the measurements. The categories, which establish a hierarchy for ranking the quality and
reliability of the information used to determine fair value, are: Level 1 Quoted market prices
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities, Level 2 Observable market based inputs or
unobservable inputs or unobservable inputs that are corroborated by market data, or Level 3
Unobservable inputs that are not corroborated by market data.
The Company is required to disclose the fair value of financial instruments, both assets and
liabilities recognized and not recognized in the statement of condition, for which it is practical
to estimate its
fair value. Certain financial instruments and all nonfinancial instruments are excluded from these
disclosure requirements. Significant assets and liabilities that are not considered financial
instruments include deferred income taxes and bank premises and equipment. Accordingly, the
aggregate fair value amounts presented do not represent the underlying value of the Company. In
preparing these disclosures, Management made highly sensitive estimates and assumptions in
developing the methodology to be utilized in the computation of fair value. These estimates and
assumptions were formulated based on judgments regarding economic conditions and risk
characteristics of the financial instruments that were present at the time the computations were
made. Events may occur that alter these conditions and may change the assumptions as well. A
change in the assumptions might affect the fair value of the financial instruments disclosed in
this footnote. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from
offering for sale at one time the Companys entire holdings of a particular financial instrument.
Fair value estimates are based on existing on and off-balance sheet financial instruments without
attempting to estimate the value of anticipated future business and the value of assets and
liabilities that are not considered financial instruments. In addition, the tax consequences
related to the realization of the unrealized gains and losses have not been computed or disclosed
herein. These methods and assumptions are set forth below.
Cash and Due from Banks
The carrying amount shown as cash and due from banks approximates fair value.
The carrying amount shown as cash and due from banks approximates fair value.
Federal Funds Sold
The carrying amount shown as federal funds sold approximates fair value.
The carrying amount shown as federal funds sold approximates fair value.
Available for Sale Securities
The fair value of available for sale securities is based on quoted market prices. The Companys
available for sale securities are reported at their estimated fair value, which is determined
utilizing several sources. The primary source is Interactive Data Corporation, which utilizes
pricing models that vary based on asset class and include available trade, bid and other market
information and whose methodology includes broker quotes, proprietary models and vast descriptive
databases. The other source for determining fair value is matrix pricing, which is a mathematical
technique used widely in the industry to value debt securities without relying exclusively on
quoted prices for the specific securities but rather by relying on the securities relationship to
other benchmark securities.
20
Table of Contents
All of the Companys available for sale securities are Level 2 assets.
Held to Maturity Securities
The fair value of held to maturity securities is based on quoted market prices.
The fair value of held to maturity securities is based on quoted market prices.
Other Investments
The carrying amount shown as other investments approximates fair value.
The carrying amount shown as other investments approximates fair value.
Federal Home Loan Bank Stock
The carrying amount shown as Federal Home Loan Bank Stock approximates fair value.
The carrying amount shown as Federal Home Loan Bank Stock approximates fair value.
Loans
The fair value of fixed rate loans is estimated by discounting the future cash flows using the
current rates at which similar loans would be made to borrowers with similar credit ratings for the
remaining maturities. The cash flows considered in computing the fair value of such loans are
segmented into categories relating to the nature of the contract and collateral based on
contractual principal maturities. Appropriate adjustments are made to reflect probable credit
losses. Cash flows have not been adjusted for such factors as prepayment risk or the effect of the
maturity of balloon notes. The fair value of floating rate loans is estimated to be its carrying
value. At each reporting period, the Company determines which loans are impaired. Accordingly, the
Companys impaired loans are reported at their estimated fair value on a non-recurring basis. An
allowance for each impaired loan, which are generally collateral-dependent, is calculated based on
the fair value of its collateral. The fair value of the collateral is based on appraisals
performed by third-party valuation specialists. Factors including the assumptions and techniques
utilized by the appraiser are considered by Management. If the recorded investment in the impaired
loan exceeds the measure of fair value of the collateral, a valuation allowance is recorded as a
component of the allowance for loan losses. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an
observable market price or a current appraised value, the Company records the impaired loan as a
non-recurring Level 2 asset. When an appraised value is not available or Management determines the
fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no
observable market price, the Company records the impaired loan as a non-recurring Level 3 asset.
Other Real Estate
When Management determines that it has sustained a loss on a loan, it may be necessary to foreclose
on the related collateral. Other real estate acquired through foreclosure is carried at fair
value, less estimated costs to sell. The fair value of the collateral is based on appraisals
performed by third-party valuation specialists. Factors including the assumptions and techniques
utilized by the appraiser are considered by Management. If the current appraisal is more than one
year old and/or the loan balance is more than $200,000, a new appraisal is obtained. Otherwise,
the Banks in-house property evaluator and Management will determine the fair value of the
collateral, based on comparable sales, market conditions, Managements plans for disposition and
other estimates of fair value obtained from principally independent sources, adjusted for estimated
selling costs. When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a
current appraised value, the Company records the other real estate as a non-recurring Level 2
asset. When an appraised value is
21
Table of Contents
not available or Management determines the fair value of the
collateral is further impaired below the
appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Company records the other real estate
as a non-recurring Level 3 asset.
Cash Surrender Value of Life Insurance
The carrying amount of cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance approximates fair value.
The carrying amount of cash surrender value of bank-owned life insurance approximates fair value.
Deposits
The fair value of non-interest bearing demand and interest bearing savings and demand
deposits is the amount reported in the financial statements. The fair value of time deposits is
estimated by discounting the cash flows using current rates of time deposits with similar remaining
maturities.
The cash flows considered in computing the fair value of such deposits are based on contractual
maturities, since approximately 98% of time deposits provide for automatic renewal at current
interest rates.
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities Sold under Agreements to Repurchase
The carrying amount shown as federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase approximates fair value.
The carrying amount shown as federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase approximates fair value.
Borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank
The fair value of FHLB fixed rate borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flows based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The Company has no FHLB variable rate borrowings.
The fair value of FHLB fixed rate borrowings is estimated using discounted cash flows based on current incremental borrowing rates for similar types of borrowing arrangements. The Company has no FHLB variable rate borrowings.
Commitments to Extend Credit and Standby Letters of Credit
Because commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are generally short-term and at variable rates, the contract value and estimated value associated with these instruments are immaterial.
Because commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit are generally short-term and at variable rates, the contract value and estimated value associated with these instruments are immaterial.
The balances of available for sale securities, which are the only assets measured at fair value on
a recurring basis, by level within the fair value hierarchy and by investment type, as of June 30,
2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Fair Value Measurement Using | ||||||||||||||||
June 30, 2011: | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries |
$ | 17,087,189 | $ | $ | 17,087,189 | $ | ||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
258,590,550 | 258,590,550 | ||||||||||||||
Mortgage-backed securities |
4,971,912 | 4,971,912 | ||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
38,229,902 | 38,229,902 | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
649,983 | 649,983 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 319,529,536 | $ | $ | 319,529,536 | $ | ||||||||||
22
Table of Contents
Fair Value Measurement Using | ||||||||||||||||
December 31, 2010: | Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | ||||||||||||
U.S. Treasuries |
$ | 26,508,971 | $ | $ | 26,508,971 | $ | ||||||||||
U.S. Government agencies |
218,595,943 | 218,595,943 | ||||||||||||||
States and political subdivisions |
41,323,566 | 41,323,566 | ||||||||||||||
Equity securities |
649,983 | 649,983 | ||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 287,078,463 | $ | $ | 287,078,463 | $ | ||||||||||
Impaired loans, which are measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, by level within the
fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Fair Value Measurement Using | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
$ | 41,280,804 | $ | $ | $ | 41,280,804 | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
14,294,758 | 14,294,758 |
The following table presents a summary of changes in the fair value of impaired loans which
are measured using level 3 inputs:
For the Six Months | For the Year | |||||||
Ended | Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 14,294,758 | $ | 20,110,330 | ||||
Additions to impaired loans and troubled
debt restructurings |
33,612,742 | 5,519,905 | ||||||
Principal payments, charge-offs and transfers
to other real estate |
(6,524,327 | ) | (12,286,059 | ) | ||||
Change in allowance for loan losses on
impaired loans |
(102,369 | ) | 950,583 | |||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 41,280,804 | $ | 14,294,758 | ||||
Other real estate, which is measured at fair value on a non-recurring basis, by level within
the fair value hierarchy as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010 are as follows:
Fair Value Measurement Using | ||||||||||||||||
Total | Level 1 | Level 2 | Level 3 | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011 |
$ | 8,163,237 | $ | $ | 1,205,000 | $ | 6,958,237 | |||||||||
December 31, 2010 |
5,744,150 | 1,248,816 | 4,495,334 |
The following table presents a summary of changes in the fair value of other real estate which
is measured using level 3 inputs:
23
Table of Contents
For the Six | For the Year | |||||||
Months Ended | Ended | |||||||
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||
Balance, beginning of period |
$ | 4,495,334 | $ | 1,521,313 | ||||
Loans transferred to ORE |
2,899,509 | 4,466,221 | ||||||
Sales |
(312,000 | ) | (1,414,850 | ) | ||||
Writedowns |
(124,606 | ) | (77,350 | ) | ||||
Balance, end of period |
$ | 6,958,237 | $ | 4,495,334 | ||||
The carrying value and estimated fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities at
June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are as follows:
June 30, 2011 | December 31, 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Carrying Amount | Fair Value | Carrying Amount | Fair Value | |||||||||||||
Financial Assets: |
||||||||||||||||
Cash and due from banks |
$ | 45,605,429 | $ | 45,605,429 | $ | 24,146,939 | $ | 24,146,939 | ||||||||
Available for sale securities |
319,529,536 | 319,529,536 | 287,078,463 | 287,078,463 | ||||||||||||
Held to maturity securities |
1,916,323 | 2,006,142 | 1,914,879 | 2,010,430 | ||||||||||||
Other investments |
3,843,455 | 3,843,455 | 3,926,371 | 3,926,371 | ||||||||||||
Federal Home Loan Bank stock |
2,153,000 | 2,153,000 | 2,281,200 | 2,281,200 | ||||||||||||
Loans, net |
386,676,260 | 391,565,813 | 403,248,499 | 407,363,159 | ||||||||||||
Cash surrender value of life
insurance |
16,076,138 | 16,076,138 | 15,951,117 | 15,951,117 | ||||||||||||
Financial Liabilities: |
||||||||||||||||
Deposits: |
||||||||||||||||
Non-interest bearing |
109,784,048 | 109,784,048 | 108,277,985 | 108,277,985 | ||||||||||||
Interest bearing |
388,635,388 | 389,714,767 | 375,861,530 | 376,715,446 | ||||||||||||
Total deposits |
498,419,436 | 499,498,815 | 484,139,515 | 484,993,431 | ||||||||||||
Federal funds purchased and
securities sold under agreements
to repurchase |
169,044,469 | 169,044,469 | 140,102,019 | 140,102,019 | ||||||||||||
Borrowings from Federal Home Loan Bank |
28,955,873 | 30,375,454 | 42,957,016 | 43,990,270 |
11. New Accounting Pronouncements:
In January 2011, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards
Update No. 2011-01, Receivables (Topic 310): Deferral of the Effective Date of Disclosures about
Troubled Debt Restructurings in Update No. 2010-20 (ASU No. 2011-01). ASU No. 2011-01 temporarily
delays the effective date of the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings required in
Accounting Standards Update No. 2010-20. It is not expected to have a material impact on the
Companys results of operations or financial position.
24
Table of Contents
In April 2011, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update No. 2011-02, Receivables: A Creditors
Determination of Whether a Restructuring is a Troubled Debt Restructuring (ASU No. 2011-02). ASU
No. 2011-02 establishes the effective date for the disclosures about troubled debt restructurings
required in ASU No. 2010-20. The standard is effective for the Company for fiscal quarters
beginning after June 15, 2010 and is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys
results of operations, financial position or disclosures.
In May 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-04, Fair Value Measurement (ASU No. 2011-04). ASU No.
2011-04 amends the fair value measurement and disclosure requirements in order to gain consistency
between the generally accepted accounting principles in the United States and the International
Financial Reporting Standards. The effective date for ASU No. 2011-04 is for the first
interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU No. 2011-04
is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys results of operations, financial
position or disclosures.
In June 2011, the FASB issued ASU No. 2011-05, Comprehensive Income (ASU No. 2011-05). ASU No.
2011-05 requires entities to present the total of comprehensive income, the components of net
income and the components of other comprehensive income in a single statement of comprehensive
income or in two separate consecutive statements. The effective date for ASU 2011-05 is for the
first interim or annual period beginning on or after December 15, 2011. The adoption of ASU No.
2011-05 is not expected to have a material impact on the Companys results of operations or
financial position. As the Company currently presents changes in comprehensive income in the
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income, the adoption of
ASU No. 2011-05 will result in a change in how comprehensive income is disclosed.
12. Reclassifications:
Certain reclassifications, which had no effect on prior year net income, have been made to prior
period statements to conform to current year presentation.
25
Table of Contents
Item 2: Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
GENERAL
The Company is a one-bank holding company headquartered in Biloxi, Mississippi. It has two
operating subsidiaries, PFC Service Corp., an inactive company, and The Peoples Bank, Biloxi,
Mississippi (the Bank). The Bank provides a full range of banking, financial and trust services
to state, county and local government entities and individuals and small and commercial businesses
operating in Harrison, Hancock, Stone and Jackson counties in Mississippi.
The following presents Managements discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition
and results of operations of Peoples Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries. These comments
should be considered in combination with the Consolidated Financial Statements and Notes to
Consolidated Financial Statements included in this report on Form 10-Q and the Consolidated
Financial Statements, Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements and Managements Discussion and
Analysis included in the Companys Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2010.
Forward-Looking Information
Congress passed the Private Securities Litigation Act of 1995 in an effort to encourage
corporations to provide information about a companys anticipated future financial performance.
This act provides a safe harbor for such disclosure which protects the companies from unwarranted
litigation if actual results are different from management expectations. This report contains
forward-looking statements and reflects industry conditions, company performance and financial
results. These forward-looking statements are subject to a number of factors and uncertainties
which could cause the Companys actual results and experience to differ from the anticipated
results and expectations expressed in such forward-looking statements. Such factors and
uncertainties include, but are not limited to: changes in interest rates and market prices, changes
in local economic and business conditions, increased competition for deposits and loans, a
deviation in actual experience from the underlying assumptions used to determine and establish the
allowance for loan losses, changes in the availability of funds resulting from reduced liquidity,
changes in government regulations and acts of terrorism, weather or other events beyond the
Companys control.
New Accounting Pronouncements
The FASB has issued new accounting standards updates,
which are disclosed in Note 11 to the
accompanying consolidated financial statements. The Company does not expect that these updates
will have a material impact on its results of operations or financial position. As the Company
currently presents changes in comprehensive income in the Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income, the adoption of ASU No. 2011-05 will result in a
change in how comprehensive income is disclosed.
Critical Accounting Policies
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States of America requires Management to make estimates and assumptions that affect
26
Table of Contents
the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities
at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during
the reporting period. The Company evaluates these estimates and assumptions on an on-going basis
using historical experience and other factors, including the current economic environment. We
adjust such estimates and assumptions when facts and circumstances dictate. Certain critical
accounting policies affect the more significant estimates and assumptions used in the preparation
of the consolidated financial statements.
Allowance for loan losses:
The Companys most critical accounting policy relates to its allowance for loan losses (ALL), which reflects the estimated losses resulting from the inability of its borrowers to make loan payments. The ALL is established and maintained at an amount sufficient to cover the estimated loss associated with the loan portfolio of the Company as of the date of determination. Credit losses arise not only from credit risk, but also from other risks inherent in the lending process including, but not limited to, collateral risk, operation risk, concentration risk and economic risk. As such, all related risks of lending are considered when assessing the adequacy of the ALL. On a quarterly basis, Management estimates the probable level of losses to determine whether the allowance is adequate to absorb reasonably foreseeable, anticipated losses in the existing portfolio based on our past loan loss experience, known and inherent risk in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay and the estimated value of any underlying collateral and current economic conditions. Management believes that the ALL is adequate and appropriate for all periods presented in these financial statements. If there was a deterioration of any of the factors considered by Management in evaluating the ALL, the estimate of loss would be updated, and additional provisions for loan losses may be required. The analysis divides the portfolio into two segments: a pool analysis of loans based upon loss history which may be adjusted by qualitative factors by loan type and a specific reserve analysis for those loans considered impaired under generally accepted accounting principles. All credit relationships with an outstanding balance of $100,000 or greater that are included in Managements loan watch list are individually reviewed for impairment. All losses are charged to the ALL when the loss actually occurs or when a determination is made that a loss is likely to occur; recoveries are credited to the ALL at the time of receipt.
The Companys most critical accounting policy relates to its allowance for loan losses (ALL), which reflects the estimated losses resulting from the inability of its borrowers to make loan payments. The ALL is established and maintained at an amount sufficient to cover the estimated loss associated with the loan portfolio of the Company as of the date of determination. Credit losses arise not only from credit risk, but also from other risks inherent in the lending process including, but not limited to, collateral risk, operation risk, concentration risk and economic risk. As such, all related risks of lending are considered when assessing the adequacy of the ALL. On a quarterly basis, Management estimates the probable level of losses to determine whether the allowance is adequate to absorb reasonably foreseeable, anticipated losses in the existing portfolio based on our past loan loss experience, known and inherent risk in the portfolio, adverse situations that may affect the borrowers ability to repay and the estimated value of any underlying collateral and current economic conditions. Management believes that the ALL is adequate and appropriate for all periods presented in these financial statements. If there was a deterioration of any of the factors considered by Management in evaluating the ALL, the estimate of loss would be updated, and additional provisions for loan losses may be required. The analysis divides the portfolio into two segments: a pool analysis of loans based upon loss history which may be adjusted by qualitative factors by loan type and a specific reserve analysis for those loans considered impaired under generally accepted accounting principles. All credit relationships with an outstanding balance of $100,000 or greater that are included in Managements loan watch list are individually reviewed for impairment. All losses are charged to the ALL when the loss actually occurs or when a determination is made that a loss is likely to occur; recoveries are credited to the ALL at the time of receipt.
Employee Benefit Plans:
Employee benefit plan liabilities and pension costs are determined utilizing actuarially determined
present value calculations. The valuation of the benefit obligation and net periodic expense is
considered critical, as it requires Management and its actuaries to make estimates regarding the
amount and timing of expected cash outflows including assumptions about mortality, expected service
periods and the rate of compensation increases.
OVERVIEW
The Company is a community bank serving the financial and trust needs of its customers in Harrison,
Hancock, Jackson and Stone Counties in Mississippi. Maintaining a strong core deposit base and
providing commercial and real estate lending in our trade area are the traditional focuses of the
27
Table of Contents
Company. Growth has largely been achieved through de novo branching activity, and it is expected
that these strategies will continue to be emphasized in the future.
With the focus of our core business being on the Mississippi Gulf Coast, any significant local
events have the potential to impact the Companys business. Although the oil spill in the Gulf of
Mexico, which occurred in the second quarter of 2010, has not had a significant direct impact on
the Company, its effects on the seafood and tourism industries in our trade area and the local
economy in general may not be known for years to come. Additionally, the current interest rate
environment, the decline in the value of real estate and the general economic downturn on local and
national levels have affected the Companys results. Managing the net interest margin in the
Companys highly competitive market and in context of larger national economic conditions has been
very challenging and will continue to be so for the foreseeable future.
Net income for the second quarter of 2011 was $809,873 compared with $1,446,082 for the second
quarter of 2010 and for the first half of 2011 was $1,247,417 as compared with $2,317,537 for the
first half of 2010. Net interest income decreased $868,634 for the second quarter of 2011 as
compared with the second quarter of 2010 and $1,999,377 for the first half of 2011 as compared with
the first half of 2010 primarily from a decrease in interest rates earned on U.S. Agency
securities. In the second quarter of 2011, interest income of $375,469 was charged-off as a result
of placing a loan with a balance of $15,187,500 on nonaccrual. Results for the second quarter and
first half of 2011 included a decrease in the provision for loan losses of $1,309,000 and
$1,548,000, a decrease in gains on sales or calls of securities of $1,556,267 and $1,560,312 and a
decrease in tax expense of $714,000 and $1,039,000 as compared with 2010.
Monitoring asset quality and addressing potential losses in our loan portfolio continues to be
emphasized during these difficult economic times. Nonaccrual loans and loans past due 90 days and
still accruing were $32,561,983 and $1,194,882 at June 30, 2011 as compared with $14,537,097 and
$2,961,555 at June 30, 2010, respectively. While nonaccrual loans have increased significantly at
June 30, 2011, the balance includes one gaming credit totaling $15,728,126, which has been
classified by the regulatory authorities for two years even though the loan is performing, and one
residential development loan totaling $15,187,500, which has no specific reserve. Net charge-offs
decreased to $1,123,773 for the first half of 2011 from $1,394,879 for the first half of 2010.
Total assets at June 30, 2011 increased $34,669,489 as compared with December 31, 2010. Deposits
increased $14,279,921 and federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to
repurchase increased $28,942,450 at June 30, 2011 as compared with December 31, 2010, which funded
the increase of $32,451,073 in available for sale securities and the decrease in borrowings from
the Federal Home Loan Bank (FHLB) of $14,001,143 for the same period. Loans decreased
$16,509,013 at June 30, 2011 as compared with December 31, 2010. Included in this decrease was the
unexpected payoff of a loan relationship of $15,500,000 during the second quarter of 2011.
28
Table of Contents
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
Net Interest Income
Net interest income, the amount by which interest income on loans, investments and other interest
earning assets exceeds interest expense on deposits and other borrowed funds, is the single largest
component of the Companys income. Managements objective is to provide the largest possible
amount of income while balancing interest rate, credit, liquidity and capital risk. Changes in the
volume and mix of interest earning assets and interest-bearing liabilities combined with changes in
market rates of interest directly affect net interest income.
Quarter Ended June 30, 2011 as Compared with Quarter Ended June 30, 2010
The Companys average interest earning assets decreased approximately $29,055,000, or 4%, from approximately $763,816,000 for the second quarter of 2010 to approximately $734,761,000 for the second quarter of 2011. The Companys average balance sheet shrunk as principal payments, maturities, charge-offs and foreclosures relating to existing loans have outpaced new loans and investments.
The Companys average interest earning assets decreased approximately $29,055,000, or 4%, from approximately $763,816,000 for the second quarter of 2010 to approximately $734,761,000 for the second quarter of 2011. The Companys average balance sheet shrunk as principal payments, maturities, charge-offs and foreclosures relating to existing loans have outpaced new loans and investments.
The average yield on earning assets decreased by 50 basis points, from 4.17% for the second
quarter of 2010 to 3.67% for the second quarter of 2011, with the biggest impact to the yield on
taxable available for sale securities. The Companys investment and liquidity strategy has been to
invest most of the proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of securities in similar securities
with a maturity of two years, the interest rates on which have decreased dramatically. As a
result, the yield on taxable available for sale securities decreased from 3.85% for the second
quarter of 2010 to 2.45% for the second quarter of 2011. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2010,
maturities have been extended to five years and longer in order to improve yield.
Average interest bearing liabilities decreased approximately $24,357,000, or 4%, from approximately
$627,114,000 for the second quarter of 2010 to approximately $602,757,000 for the second quarter of
2011.
The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased 22 basis points, from .79% for the
second quarter of 2010 to .57% for the second quarter of 2011. This decrease is the result of
utilizing lower cost funding sources including brokered deposits and FHLB advances in 2011 as
compared with 2010. The Company believes that it is unlikely that its cost of funds can be
materially reduced further.
The Companys net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis, which is net income as a percentage of
average earning assets, was 3.20% for the quarter ended June 30, 2011, down 32 basis points from
3.52% for the quarter ended June 30, 2010.
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 as Compared with Six Months Ended June 30, 2010
The Companys average interest earning assets decreased approximately $50,322,000, or 7% , from
approximately $771,117,000 for the first half of 2010 to approximately $720,795,000 for the first
half of 2011. The Companys average balance sheet shrunk as principal payments, maturities,
29
Table of Contents
charge-offs and foreclosures relating to existing loans have outpaced new loans and investments.
The average yield on earning assets decreased by 44 basis points, from 4.25% for the first half of
2010 to 3.81% for the first half of 2011, with the biggest impact to the yield on taxable available
for sale securities. The Companys investment and liquidity strategy has been to invest most of
the proceeds from sales, calls and maturities of securities in similar securities with a maturity
of two years, the interest rates on which have decreased dramatically. As a result, the yield on
taxable available for sale securities decreased from 4.08% for the first half of 2010 to 2.44% for
the first half of 2011. Beginning in the fourth quarter of 2010, maturities have been extended to
five years and longer in order to improve yield.
Average interest bearing liabilities decreased approximately $48,203,000, or 8%, from
approximately $637,108,000 for the first half of 2010 to approximately $588,905,000 for the first
half of 2011.
The average rate paid on interest bearing liabilities decreased 17 basis points, from .78% for the
first half of 2010 to .61% for the first half of 2011. This decrease is the result of utilizing
lower cost funding sources including brokered deposits and FHLB advances in 2011 as compared with
2010. The Company believes that it is unlikely that its cost of funds can be materially reduced
further.
The Companys net interest margin on a tax-equivalent basis, which is net income as a percentage of
average earning assets, was 3.31% for the six months ended June 30, 2011, down 29 basis points from
3.60% for the six months ended June 30, 2010.
The tables on the following pages analyze the changes in tax-equivalent net interest income for the
quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 and the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010.
30
Table of Contents
Analysis of Average Balances, Interest Earned/Paid and Yield
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Quarter Ended June 30, 2011 | Quarter Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance | Interest Earned/Paid | Rate | Average Balance | Interest Earned/Paid | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2)(3) |
$ | 391,346 | $ | 4,381 | 4.48 | % | $ | 445,601 | $ | 4,893 | 4.39 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold |
2,318 | 4 | 0.69 | % | 2,670 | 2 | 0.30 | % | ||||||||||||||||
HTM: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non taxable (1) |
1,916 | 27 | 5.64 | % | 3,025 | 36 | 4.76 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AFS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
295,317 | 1,806 | 2.45 | % | 267,579 | 2,576 | 3.85 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non taxable (1) |
40,913 | 519 | 5.07 | % | 40,340 | 444 | 4.40 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
2,951 | 3 | 0.41 | % | 4,601 | 3 | 0.26 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 734,761 | $ | 6,740 | 3.67 | % | $ | 763,816 | $ | 7,954 | 4.17 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings & interest-bearing DDA |
$ | 249,035 | $ | 265 | 0.43 | % | $ | 223,111 | $ | 289 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||||||
CDs |
169,899 | 386 | 0.91 | % | 197,044 | 560 | 1.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds
purchased |
147,997 | 170 | 0.46 | % | 155,629 | 276 | 0.71 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
35,826 | 45 | 0.50 | % | 51,330 | 110 | 0.86 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 602,757 | $ | 866 | 0.57 | % | $ | 627,114 | $ | 1,235 | 0.79 | % | ||||||||||||
Net tax-equivalent
margin on earning assets |
3.20 | % | 3.52 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | All interest earned is reported on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34% in 2011 and 2010. |
|
(2) | Loan fees of $197 and $115 for 2011 and 2010, respectively, are included in these figures. |
|
(3) | Includes nonaccrual loans. |
31
Table of Contents
Analysis of Average Balances, Interest Earned/Paid and Yield
(In Thousands)
(In Thousands)
Six Months Ended June 30, 2011 | Six Months Ended June 30, 2010 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
Average Balance | Interest Earned/Paid | Rate | Average Balance | Interest Earned/Paid | Rate | |||||||||||||||||||
Loans (2)(3) |
$ | 399,497 | $ | 9,288 | 4.65 | % | $ | 450,712 | $ | 9,880 | 4.38 | % | ||||||||||||
Federal Funds Sold |
3,730 | 5 | 0.27 | % | 4,222 | 5 | 0.24 | % | ||||||||||||||||
HTM: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Non taxable (1) |
1,916 | 52 | 5.43 | % | 3,113 | 80 | 5.14 | % | ||||||||||||||||
AFS: |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
Taxable |
271,379 | 3,309 | 2.44 | % | 267,586 | 5,457 | 4.08 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Non taxable (1) |
41,266 | 1,053 | 5.10 | % | 40,353 | 941 | 4.66 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Other |
3,007 | 9 | 0.60 | % | 5,131 | 8 | 0.31 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 720,795 | $ | 13,716 | 3.81 | % | $ | 771,117 | $ | 16,371 | 4.25 | % | ||||||||||||
Savings & interest-
bearing DDA |
$ | 233,294 | $ | 525 | 0.45 | % | $ | 223,047 | $ | 578 | 0.52 | % | ||||||||||||
CDs |
175,304 | 829 | 0.95 | % | 187,331 | 1,089 | 1.16 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Federal funds
purchased |
141,819 | 342 | 0.48 | % | 163,178 | 563 | 0.69 | % | ||||||||||||||||
FHLB advances |
38,488 | 95 | 0.49 | % | 63,552 | 246 | 0.77 | % | ||||||||||||||||
Total |
$ | 588,905 | $ | 1,791 | 0.61 | % | $ | 637,108 | $ | 2,476 | 0.78 | % | ||||||||||||
Net tax-equivalent
margin on earning assets |
3.31 | % | 3.60 | % | ||||||||||||||||||||
(1) | All interest earned is reported on a taxable equivalent basis using a tax rate of 34% in
2011 and 2010. |
|
(2) | Loan fees of $363 and $316 for 2011 and 2010, respectively, are included in these figures. |
|
(3) | Includes nonaccrual loans. |
Provision for Loan Losses
In the normal course of business, the Company assumes risk in extending credit to its customers.
This credit risk is managed through compliance with the loan policy, which is approved by the Board
of Directors. The policy establishes guidelines relating to underwriting standards, including but
not limited to financial analysis, collateral valuation, lending limits, pricing considerations and
loan
32
Table of Contents
grading. A loan review process further assists with evaluating credit quality and assessing
potential performance issues. Loan delinquencies and deposit overdrafts are closely monitored in
order to identify developing problems as early as possible. In addition, the Company continuously
monitors its relationships with its loan customers in concentrated industries such as gaming and
hotel/motel, as well as the exposure for out of area, land, development, construction and
commercial real estate loans, and their direct and indirect impact on its operations. A watch list
of credits which pose a potential loss to the Company is prepared based on the loan grading system.
This list forms the foundation of the Companys allowance for loan loss computation.
Management relies on its guidelines and existing methodology to monitor the performance of its loan
portfolio and identify and estimate potential losses based on the best available information. The
potential effect resulting from the economic downturn on a national and local level, the decline in
real estate values and actual losses incurred by the Company were key factors in our analysis.
The potential direct and/or indirect impact of the oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico on the Company
and its customers was also considered and will continue to be monitored as there is still
sufficient uncertainty as to the ultimate impact. However, no direct potential losses as a result
of the spill were identified as of June 30, 2011.
The Companys on-going, systematic evaluation resulted in the Company recording a provision for
loan losses of $546,000 and $1,585,000 for the second quarters of 2011 and 2010, respectively, and
$1,187,000 and $2,735,000 for the first half of 2011 and 2010, respectively.
The decline in the value of real estate has negatively impacted the collateral relating to the
Companys residential and land development portfolio. In 2010, the Companys evaluation of this
portfolio and related collateral resulted in a significant increase in provisions for this
portfolio. Specifically, approximately 50% and 53% of the provisions for the second quarter and
first half of 2010, respectively, related to the residential and land development portfolio.
Additional provisions
were charged to expense and, where appropriate, charge-offs against the allowance for loan losses
were recorded during the remaining quarters of 2010. As a result of actions taken by Management in
2010, the allowance for loan losses on residential and land development portfolio decreased from
$2,640,000 at June 30, 2010 to $529,000 at June 30, 2011. One loan included in this portfolio with
a balance of $15,187,500 at June 30, 2011 has no specific reserve.
The allowance for loan losses as a percentage of loans was 1.71% and 1.62% at June 30, 2011 and
December 31, 2010, respectively. The Company believes that its allowance for loan losses is
appropriate as of June 30, 2011.
The allowance for loan losses is an estimate, and as such, events may occur in the future which may
affect its accuracy. The Company anticipates that it is possible that additional information will
be gathered in future quarters which may require an adjustment to the allowance for loan losses.
Management will continue to closely monitor its portfolio and take such action as it deems
appropriate to accurately report its financial condition and results of operations.
33
Table of Contents
Non-interest income
Non-interest income for the second quarter of 2011 decreased $1,233,205 as compared with the second
quarter of 2010 as a result of changes in service charges on deposit accounts, gains on sales or
calls of securities and a gain from redemption of life insurance. Service charges on deposit
accounts decreased $124,339 in 2011 as compared with 2010, primarily due to the decrease in NSF fee
income of $86,804. NSF fee income has decreased as a result of the local and national economy
impacting customers overdraft activity as well as customers opting out of overdraft protection
service for debit card transactions. Gains on sales or calls of securities were $7,174 for the
second quarter of 2011 as compared with $1,563,441 for the second quarter of 2010. During 2010,
the Company liquidated its entire mortgage-backed securities portfolio and some of its short-term
U.S. Treasuries. As a result of the death of a participant in one of the Companys deferred
compensation plans, bank owned life insurance was redeemed during the second quarter of 2011,
resulting in a gain of $389,119.
Non-interest income for the first half of 2011 decreased $1,343,428 as compared with the first half
of 2010 as a result of changes in service charges on deposit accounts, gains on sales or calls of
securities and a gain from redemption of life insurance. Service charges on deposit accounts
decreased $277,814 in 2011 as compared with 2010, primarily due to the decrease in NSF fee income
of $212,728. NSF fee income has decreased as a result of the local and national economy impacting
customers overdraft activity as well as customers opting out of overdraft protection service for
debit card transactions. Gains on sales or calls of securities were $7,174 for the first half of
2011 as compared with $1,567,486 for the first half quarter of 2010. During 2010, the Company
liquidated its entire mortgage-backed securities portfolio and some of its short-term U.S.
Treasuries. As a result of the death of a participant in one of the Companys deferred compensation
plans, bank owned life insurance was redeemed during the first half of 2011, resulting in a gain of
$389,119.
Non-interest expense
Total non-interest expense increased $287,370 for the second quarter of 2011 as compared with the
second quarter of 2010 as a result of net occupancy, FDIC assessments and other expense. Net
occupancy costs increased $111,115 primarily due to insurance expense being $91,565 higher in 2011
as compared with 2010 as a result of increased insurance rates on our properties. FDIC and state
insurance assessments increased $46,569 for the second quarter of 2011 as compared with the second
quarter of 2010 as banks fund the replenishment of the bank insurance fund which was depleted by
the recent swell of bank closures and more frequent state assessments have been levied in the
current year. Other expenses increased $132,284 for the second quarter of 2011 as compared with
the second quarter of 2010 as costs associated with the larger volume of foreclosures increased
$82,459 in 2011 as compared with 2010.
Total non-interest expense increased $314,315 for the first half of 2011 as compared with the first
half of 2010 as a result of net occupancy, FDIC assessments and other expense. Net occupancy
costs increased $200,272 primarily due to insurance expense being $195,115 higher in 2011 as
compared with 2010 as a result of increased insurance rates on our properties. FDIC and state
insurance assessments increased $102,008 for the first half of 2011 as compared with the first half
of
34
Table of Contents
2010 as banks fund the replenishment of the bank insurance fund which was depleted by the recent
swell of bank closures and more frequent state assessments have been levied in the current year.
Other expenses increased $115,664 for the first half of 2011 as compared with the first half of
2010 as costs associated with the larger volume of foreclosures increased $130,230 in 2011 as
compared with 2010.
Income Tax Expense (Benefit)
Income taxes have been impacted by non-taxable income and federal tax credits during the six months
and quarters ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, as follows:
Quarters Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Tax | Rate | Tax | Rate | |||||||||||||
Taxes at statutory rate |
$ | 210,077 | 34 | $ | 669,148 | 34 | ||||||||||
Increase (decrease) resulting from: |
||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt interest income |
(137,935 | ) | (23 | ) | (107,668 | ) | (6 | ) | ||||||||
Income from BOLI |
(174,930 | ) | (28 | ) | (42,956 | ) | (2 | ) | ||||||||
Federal tax credits |
(91,410 | ) | (15 | ) | ||||||||||||
Other |
2,198 | 1 | 3,476 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total income taxes (benefit) |
$ | (192,000 | ) | (31 | ) | $ | 522,000 | 27 | ||||||||
Six Months Ended June 30, | ||||||||||||||||
2011 | 2010 | |||||||||||||||
Tax | Rate | Tax | Rate | |||||||||||||
Taxes at statutory rate |
$ | 307,842 | 34 | $ | 1,024,943 | 34 | ||||||||||
Increase (decrease) resulting from: |
||||||||||||||||
Tax-exempt interest income |
(263,429 | ) | (29 | ) | (229,024 | ) | (8 | ) | ||||||||
Income from BOLI |
(219,912 | ) | (24 | ) | (87,020 | ) | (3 | ) | ||||||||
Federal tax credits |
(182,820 | ) | (20 | ) | (32,160 | ) | (1 | ) | ||||||||
Other |
16,319 | 1 | 20,261 | 1 | ||||||||||||
Total income taxes (benefit) |
$ | (342,000 | ) | (38 | ) | $ | 697,000 | 23 | ||||||||
FINANCIAL CONDITION
Available for sale securities increased $32,451,073 at June 30, 2011, compared with December 31,
2010, as funds available from the increase in deposits and federal
funds purchased and securities
sold under agreements to repurchase are invested in these securities.
Loans decreased $16,509,013 at June 30, 2011 as compared with December 31, 2010 as a result of loan
payments, maturities, foreclosures, charge-offs and a slower volume of new loans. The Company
anticipates that its loan portfolio will decline further in the remaining quarters of 2011.
Other real estate (ORE) increased $2,419,087 at June 30, 2011 as compared with December 31, 2010.
Loans totaling $2,927,510 were transferred into ORE, one property included in ORE was
35
Table of Contents
written down
by $124,606 and ORE totaling $383,817 was sold during 2011.
Prepaid FDIC assessments decreased by $754,552 at June 30, 2011 as compared with December 31, 2010
as a result of the amortization of these costs.
Other assets decreased $3,584,207 at June 30, 2011 as compared with December 31, 2010 primarily as
a result of the refund of income taxes of $2,130,362 and a decrease in deferred tax assets of
$1,733,386. The increase in the fair value of available for securities changed from an unrealized
loss to an unrealized gain which created a deferred tax asset.
Total deposits increased $14,279,921 at June 30, 2011, as compared with December 31, 2010.
Typically, significant increases or decreases in total deposits and/or significant fluctuations
among the different types of deposits from quarter to quarter are anticipated by Management as
customers in the casino industry and county and municipal entities reallocate their resources
periodically.
Federal funds purchased and securities sold under agreements to repurchase increased
$28,942,450. This includes non-deposit accounts which fluctuate as customers periodically
reallocate their funds.
Borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank decreased $14,001,143 at June 30, 2011 as compared with
December 31, 2010 based on the liquidity needs of the bank subsidiary.
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY AND CAPITAL ADEQUACY
Strength, security and stability have been the hallmark of the Company since its founding in 1985
and of its bank subsidiary since its founding in 1896. A strong capital foundation is fundamental
to the continuing prosperity of the Company and the security of its customers and shareholders.
The Company and the Bank are subject to regulatory capital adequacy requirements imposed by the
federal banking agencies. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for
prompt corrective action, specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of the
bank subsidiarys assets and certain off-balance sheet items, adjusted for credit risk, as
calculated under regulatory accounting practices must be met. The risk-based capital standards
currently in effect are designed to make regulatory capital requirements more sensitive to
differences in risk profiles among bank holding companies and banks and to account for off-balance
sheet exposure. Quantitative measures established by regulation to ensure capital adequacy require
the Company and Bank to maintain minimum amounts and ratios of Total and Tier 1 capital to
risk-weighted assets, and Tier 1 capital to average assets.
As of June 30, 2011, the most recent notification from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation
categorized the bank subsidiary as well capitalized under the regulatory framework for prompt
corrective action. To be categorized as well capitalized, the bank subsidiary must have a Total
risk-based capital ratio of 10.00% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.00% or
greater and a Leverage capital ratio of 5.00% or greater. There are no conditions or events since
that notification that Management believes have changed the bank subsidiarys category.
The actual capital amounts and ratios and required minimum capital amounts and ratios for the
36
Table of Contents
Company as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
Actual | For Capital Adequacy Purposes | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
$ | 110,069 | 21.25 | % | $ | 41,438 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
103,602 | 20.00 | % | 20,719 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
103,602 | 12.53 | % | 33,069 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
$ | 110,435 | 22.26 | % | $ | 39,691 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
104,233 | 21.01 | % | 19,846 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
104,233 | 12.40 | % | 33,616 | 4.00 | % |
The actual capital amounts and ratios and required minimum capital amounts and ratios for the
Bank as of June 30, 2011 and December 31, 2010, are as follows (in thousands):
Actual | For Capital Adequacy Purposes | |||||||||||||||
Amount | Ratio | Amount | Ratio | |||||||||||||
June 30, 2011: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
$ | 105,191 | 20.34 | % | $ | 41,372 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
98,723 | 19.09 | % | 20,686 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
98,723 | 11.95 | % | 33,047 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
December 31, 2010: |
||||||||||||||||
Total Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
$ | 105,255 | 21.41 | % | $ | 39,320 | 8.00 | % | ||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Risk Weighted Assets) |
99,111 | 20.16 | % | 19,660 | 4.00 | % | ||||||||||
Tier 1 Capital (to Average Assets) |
99,111 | 11.86 | % | 33,431 | 4.00 | % |
In addition to monitoring its risk-based capital ratios, the Company also determines the
primary capital ratio on a quarterly basis. This ratio was 13.94% at June 30, 2011, which is well
above the regulatory minimum of 6.00%. Management continues to emphasize the importance of
maintaining the appropriate capital levels of the Company and has established the goal of
maintaining its primary capital ratio at 8.00%, which is the minimum requirement for classification
as being well-capitalized by the banking regulatory authorities.
LIQUIDITY
Liquidity represents the Companys ability to adequately provide funds to satisfy demands from
depositors, borrowers and other commitments by either converting assets to cash or accessing new or
existing sources of funds. Management monitors these funds requirements in such a manner as to
satisfy these demands and provide the maximum earnings on its earning assets. The Company manages
and monitors its liquidity position through a number of methods, including through the computation
of liquidity risk targets and the preparation of various analyses of its funding sources and
utilization of those sources on a monthly basis. The Company also uses proforma liquidity
projections which are updated on a continuous basis in the management of its liquidity needs and
37
Table of Contents
also conducts contingency testing on its liquidity plan.
Deposits, payments of principal and interest on loans, proceeds from maturities of investment
securities and earnings on investment securities are the principal sources of funds for the
Company. Borrowings from the FHLB, federal funds sold and federal funds purchased are utilized by
the Company to manage its daily liquidity position. The Company has also been approved to
participate in the Federal Reserve Banks Discount Window Primary Credit Program, which it intends
to use only as a contingency.
REGULATORY MATTERS
During 2009, Management identified opportunities for improving risk management, addressing asset
quality concerns, managing concentrations of credit risk and ensuring sufficient liquidity at the
Bank as a result of its own investigation as well as examinations performed by certain bank
regulatory agencies. In concert with the regulators, the Company and the Bank identified specific
corrective steps and actions to enhance its risk management, asset quality and liquidity policies,
controls and procedures. The Company and the Bank may not declare or pay any cash dividends without
the prior written approval of their regulators.
Item 4: Controls and Procedures
As of June 30, 2011, an evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation
of the Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer of the effectiveness of the Companys
disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e)). Based on that
evaluation, the Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer have concluded that the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures are effective to ensure that the information required
to be disclosed by the Company in the reports it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act
of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the
Securities and Exchange Commissions rules and forms.
There were no changes in the Companys internal control over financial reporting that occurred
during the period ended June 30, 2011 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Companys internal control over financial reporting.
PART II - OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1: Legal Proceedings
The Bank is involved in various legal matters and claims which are being defended and handled in
the ordinary course of business. None of these matters is expected, in the opinion of Management,
to have a material adverse effect upon the financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
38
Table of Contents
Item 5: Other Information
Lyle M. Page, a director of the Company, passed away on July 22, 2011, after many years of service
to the Company and its bank subsidiary. The Company will appoint a new director to complete Mr.
Pages one year term on the board at its next meeting on August 24, 2011.
Item 6 - Exhibits and Reports on Form 8-K
(a) Exhibits
Exhibit 31.1: | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
Exhibit 31.2: | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes - Oxley Act of 2002 |
|||
Exhibit 32.1: | Certification of Chief Executive Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 |
|||
Exhibit 32.2: | Certification of Chief Financial Officer Pursuant to 18 U.S.C. ss. 1350 |
|||
Exhibit 101 | The following materials from the Companys quarterly report on Form 10-Q for
the quarter ended June 30, 2011, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting
Language): (i) Consolidated Statements of Condition at June 30, 2011 and December 31,
2010, (ii)Consolidated Statements of Income for the quarters ended June 30, 2011 and
2010 and for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010, (iii) Consolidated Statement
of Changes in Shareholders Equity and Comprehensive Income for the six months ended
June 30, 2011, (iv) Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended
June 30, 2011 and 2010 and (v) Notes to the Unaudited Consolidated Financial
Statements for the six months ended June 30, 2011 and 2010 tagged as blocks of text. |
|||
In accordance with Rule 406T of Regulation S-T, the XBRL related
information in Exhibit 101 to this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q shall not
be deemed to be filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities
Exchange Act of 1934 (the Exchange Act), or otherwise subject to the
liability of that section, and shall not be part of any registration
statement or other document filed under the Securities Act of 1933 or the
Exchange Act, except as shall be expressly set forth by specific reference
in such filing. |
(b) Reports on Form 8-K
A Form 8-K was filed on April 27, 2011, April 28, 2011, June 29, 2011 and July 27, 2011.
39
Table of Contents
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirement of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant
has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly
authorized.
PEOPLES FINANCIAL CORPORATION (Registrant) |
||||||
Date:
|
August 12, 2011
|
|||||
By:
|
/s/ Chevis C. Swetman
|
|||||
Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer |
||||||
(principal executive officer) |
||||||
Date:
|
August 12, 2011
|
|||||
By:
|
/s/ Lauri A. Wood | |||||
Lauri A. Wood | ||||||
Chief Financial Officer and Controller |
||||||
(principal financial and accounting officer) |
40