Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

WASHINGTON, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 10-Q

 

(Mark one)

 

x           QUARTERLY REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the quarterly period ended June 30, 2009

 

OR

 

o              TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

 

For the transition period from           to           

 

Commission file number 000-32929

 

 

MOSYS, Inc.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

755 N. Mathilda Avenue

Sunnyvale, California, 94085

(Address of principal executive office and zip code)

 

(408) 731-1800

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

 

 

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to filing requirements for the past 90 days.       YES  x        NO  o

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). YES  o        NO  ¨

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer,” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):

 

Large accelerated filer o		Accelerated filer x
Non-accelerated filer o		Smaller reporting company o
(Do not check if a smaller reporting company)

 

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes o     No x

 

As of August 1, 2009, 31,199,298 shares of the Registrant’s common stock, $0.01 par value, were outstanding.

 

 

Table of Contents

 

MOSYS, INC.

 

FORM 10-Q
June 30, 2009

 

TABLE OF CONTENTS

 

PART I —	FINANCIAL INFORMATION
Item 1.	Financial Statements (Unaudited):
	Condensed Consolidated Balance Sheets as of June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008	3
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	4
	Condensed Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008	5
	Notes to Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements	6
Item 2.	Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations	18
Item 3.	Qualitative and Quantitative Disclosures About Market Risk	25
Item 4.	Controls and Procedures	25
PART II —	OTHER INFORMATION
Item 1A.	Risk Factors	26
Item 4.	Submission of Matters to a Vote of Security Holders	28
Item 6.	Exhibits	28
	Signatures	29

 

Table of Contents

 

PART I—FINANCIAL INFORMATION

 

Item 1. Financial Statements

 

MOSYS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands, except par value)

 

		June 30, 2009			December 31, 2008
ASSETS
Current assets
Cash and cash equivalents		$	4,274		$	17,515
Short-term investments		20,781			26,560
Accounts receivable, net		1,030			688
Unbilled contracts receivable		2,515			428
Prepaid expenses and other assets		2,236			2,158
Total current assets		30,836			47,349
Long-term investments		20,385			23,395
Property and equipment, net		1,097			958
Goodwill		22,584			12,326
Intangible assets, net		5,903			––
Other assets		1,507			1,905
Total assets		$	82,312		$	85,933
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY
Current liabilities
Accounts payable		$	401		$	167
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		1,914			2,235
Accrued restructuring liabilities		473			1,004
Deferred revenue		1,937			639
Total current liabilities		4,725			4,045
Long-term liabilities		4,684			—
Commitments and contingencies (Note 3)
Stockholders’ equity
Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 20,000 shares authorized; none issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		—			—
Common stock, $0.01 par value; 120,000 shares authorized; 31,198 shares and 31,630 shares issued and outstanding at June 30, 2009 and December 31, 2008		312			317
Additional paid-in capital		114,706			114,403
Accumulated other comprehensive income		210			280
Accumulated deficit		(42,325		)	(33,112		)
Total stockholders’ equity		72,903			81,888
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity		$	82,312		$	85,933

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

3

Table of Contents

 

MOSYS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS

(Unaudited)
(In thousands, except per share data)

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009			2008			2009			2008
Net revenue
Licensing		$	306		$	667		$	830		$	1,099
Royalty		1,675			2,528			3,717			4,913
Total net revenue		1,981			3,195			4,547			6,012
Cost of net revenue
Licensing		276			833			596			1,313
Total cost of net revenue		276			833			596			1,313
Gross profit		1,705			2,362			3,951			4,699
Operating expenses
Research and development		4,072			4,541			7,901			8,837
Selling, general and administrative		2,461			2,926			4,878			6,282
Restructuring charges		431			––			706			––
Total operating expenses		6,964			7,467			13,485			15,119
Loss from operations		(5,259		)	(5,105		)	(9,534		)	(10,420		)
Other income, net		151			561			354			1,635
Loss before income taxes		(5,108		)	(4,544		)	(9,180		)	(8,785		)
Income tax provision		(26		)	(46		)	(33		)	(89		)
Net loss		$	(5,134	)	$	(4,590	)	$	(9,213	)	$	(8,874	)
Net loss per share
Basic and diluted		$	(0.16	)	$	(0.14	)	$	(0.29	)	$	(0.28	)
Shares used in computing net loss per share
Basic and diluted		31,198			31, 703			31,261			31, 690
Allocation of stock-based compensation to cost of net revenue and operating expenses included above:
Cost of net revenue		$	40		$	151		$	72		$	231
Research and development		279			356			453			729
Selling, general and administrative		469			826			710			1,639

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

4

Table of Contents

 

MOSYS, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(Unaudited)

(In thousands)

 

		Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009			2008
Cash flows from operating activities:
Net loss		$	(9,213	)	$	(8,874	)
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
Depreciation and amortization		349			359
Stock-based compensation		1,235			2,599
Amortization of intangible assets		177			394
Non-cash restructuring charges		122			—
Provision for doubtful accounts		47			—
Net realized gain on auction-rate securities		(16		)	—
Changes in assets and liabilities, net of business acquired:
Accounts receivable		451			132
Unbilled contracts receivable		428			245
Prepaid expenses and other assets		104			910
Deferred revenue		(570		)	783
Accounts payable		201			261
Accrued expenses and other liabilities		(218		)	(19		)
Accrued restructuring liabilities		(653		)	—
Net cash used in operating activities		(7,556		)	(3,210		)
Cash flows from investing activities:
Purchases of property and equipment		(343		)	(324		)
Net cash paid for purchase of Prism Circuits, Inc.		(13,563		)	—
Proceeds from sales and maturity of marketable securities		29,102			44,327
Purchases of marketable securities		(19,944		)	(37,502		)
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities		(4,748		)	6,501
Cash flows from financing activities:
Proceeds from issuance of common stock		—			181
Repurchase of common stock		(937		)	—
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities		(937		)	181
Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents		(13,241		)	3,472
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of period		17,515			37,673
Cash and cash equivalents at end of period		$	4,274		$	41,145

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

 

5

Table of Contents

 

MOSYS, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(Unaudited)

 

Note 1. The Company and Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

 

The Company

 

MoSys, Inc. (the Company) was incorporated in California in September 1991, and reincorporated in September 2000 in Delaware. The Company designs, develops, markets and licenses high performance semiconductor memory and high speed parallel and serial interface intellectual property (IP) used by the semiconductor industry and communications, networking and storage equipment manufacturers.

 

The accompanying condensed consolidated financial statements of the Company have been prepared without audit in accordance with the rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).  The balance sheet at December 31, 2008 has been derived from the audited consolidated financial statements at that date. Certain information and disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States have been condensed or omitted in accordance with these rules and regulations. The information in this report should be read in conjunction with the Company’s consolidated financial statements and notes thereto included in its most recent annual report on Form 10-K filed with the SEC.

 

In the opinion of management, the accompanying unaudited condensed financial statements reflect all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to summarize fairly the Company’s financial position, results of operations and cash flows for the interim periods presented. The operating results for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the year ending December 31, 2009 or for any other future period.

 

Basis of Presentation

 

The condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its wholly-owned subsidiaries. All significant intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in consolidation. The Company’s fiscal year ends on December 31 of each calendar year.

 

Use of Estimates

 

The preparation of financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues recognized under the percentage of completion method and expenses recognized during the reported period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

 

Cash Equivalents and Investments

 

The Company accounts for investments in accordance with Statement of Financial Accounting Standards (SFAS) No. 115, “Accounting for Certain Investments in Debt and Equity Securities.” The Company has invested its excess cash in money market accounts, auction-rate securities, corporate debt, government agency and municipal debt securities and considers all highly liquid debt instruments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less to be cash equivalents. Investments with original maturities greater than three months and remaining maturities less than one year are classified as short-term investments. Investments with remaining maturities greater than one year are classified as long-term investments. Management generally determines the appropriate classification of securities at the time of purchase. All securities, excluding auction-rate securities, are classified as available-for-sale. The Company’s short-term and long-term investments are carried at fair value, with the unrealized holding gains and losses reported in accumulated other comprehensive income.  Realized gains and losses and declines in the value judged to be other than temporary are included in the other income, net line item in the condensed consolidated statements of operations. The cost of securities sold is based on the specific identification method.

 

During the fourth quarter of fiscal 2008, the Company reclassified its auction-rate securities from available-for-sale to trading securities. Investments that the Company designates as trading securities are reported at fair value, with gains or losses which result from changes in fair value, recognized in earnings (see Note 2).

 

6

Table of Contents

 

Fair Value Measurements

 

The Company adopted SFAS No. 157 (SFAS No. 157), “Fair Value Measurements,” on January 1, 2008. SFAS No. 157 establishes a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs to valuation techniques used to measure fair value into three broad levels, as follows:

 

Level 1—Inputs used to measure fair value are unadjusted quoted prices that are available in active markets for the identical assets or liabilities as of the reporting date.

 

Level 2—Pricing is provided by third party sources of market information obtained through the Company’s investment advisors rather than models. The Company does not adjust for or apply any additional assumptions or estimates to the pricing information it receives from advisors. Cash equivalents and available-for-sale securities consisted primarily of commercial paper, corporate debt, and government agency and municipal debt securities from issuers with high quality credit ratings. The Company’s investment advisors obtain pricing data from independent sources, such as Standard & Poor’s, Bloomberg and Interactive Data Corporation, and rely on comparable pricing of other securities because the Level 2 securities it holds are not actively traded and have fewer observable transactions. The Company considers this the most reliable information available for the valuation of the securities.

 

Level 3—Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and reflect the use of significant management judgment are used to measure fair value. These values are generally determined using pricing models for which the assumptions utilize management’s estimates of market participant assumptions. The determination of fair value for Level 3 investments and other financial instruments involves the most management judgment and subjectivity.

 

Revenue Recognition

 

General

 

The Company generates revenue from the licensing of its IP, and customers pay fees for licensing, development services, royalties and maintenance and support. The Company applies the principles of SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 104 (SAB 104), “Revenue Recognition, corrected copy,” and recognizes revenue when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, delivery or performance has occurred, the sales price is fixed or determinable, and collectibility is reasonably assured. Evidence of an arrangement generally consists of signed agreements. When sales arrangements contain multiple elements (e.g., license and services), the Company applies the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) Issue No. 00-21 (EITF 00-21), “Revenue Arrangements with Multiple Deliverables,” to determine the separate units of accounting that exist within the agreement. If more than one unit of accounting exists, the consideration payable to the Company under the agreement is allocated to each unit of accounting using either the relative fair value method or the residual fair value method as prescribed by EITF 00-21. Revenue is recognized for each unit of accounting when the revenue recognition criteria of SAB 104 have been met for that unit of accounting.

 

Licensing

 

Licensing revenue consists of fees earned from license agreements, development services and support and maintenance. For license agreements that do not require significant development, modification or customization, revenues are generally recognized when the criteria of SAB 104 have been met. If any of these criteria are not met, revenue recognition is deferred until such time as all criteria have been met.

 

For license agreements that include deliverables requiring significant production, modification or customization, the Company applies American Institute of Certified Public Accountants’ Statement of Position No. 81-1 (SOP 81-1), “Accounting for Performance of Construction-Type and Certain Production-Type Contracts.” When the Company has significant experience in meeting the design specifications involved in the contract and the direct labor hours related to services under the contract can be reasonably estimated, the Company recognizes revenue over the period in which the contract services are performed. For these arrangements, the Company recognizes revenue using the percentage of completion method. Revenue recognized in any period is dependent on the Company’s progress toward completion of projects in progress. Significant management judgment and discretion are used to estimate total direct labor hours. These judgmental elements include determining that the Company has the experience to meet the design specifications and estimation of the total direct labor hours. The Company follows this method because it can obtain reasonably dependable estimates of the direct labor hours to perform the contract services. The direct labor hours for the development of the licensee’s design are estimated at the beginning of the contract. As these direct labor hours are incurred, they are used as a measure of progress towards completion. The Company has the ability to reasonably estimate the direct labor hours on a contract-by-contract basis based on its

 

7

Table of Contents

 

experience in developing prior licensees’ designs. During the contract performance period, the Company reviews estimates of direct labor hours to complete the contracts as the contract progresses to completion and will revise its estimates of revenue and gross profit under the contract if the Company revises the estimations of the direct labor hours to complete. The Company’s policy is to reflect any revision in the contract gross profit estimate in reported income in the period in which the facts giving rise to the revision become known. Under the percentage of completion method, provisions for estimated losses on uncompleted contracts are recorded in the period in which the likelihood of such losses is determined. No loss accruals were recorded for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. In the three months ended June 30, 2008, the Company recorded a loss accrual of $211,000. No other loss accruals were recorded during the six months ended June 30, 2008. If the amount of revenue recognized under the percentage of completion accounting method exceeds the amount of billings to a customer, then the excess amount is recorded as an unbilled contracts receivable.

 

For contracts involving design specifications that the Company has not previously met or if inherent risks make estimates doubtful, the contract is accounted for under the completed contract method, and the Company defers the recognition of all revenue until the design meets the contractual design specifications. In this event, the cost of revenue is expensed as incurred. When the Company has experience in meeting design specifications but does not have significant experience to reasonably estimate the direct labor hours related to services to meet a design specification, the Company defers both the recognition of revenue and the cost. No revenue was recognized under the completed contract method for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 or 2008.

 

The Company provides support and maintenance under many of its license agreements. Under these arrangements, the Company provides unspecified upgrades, design rule changes and technical support. No other upgrades, products or other post-contract support are provided. Support and maintenance revenue is recognized at its fair value established by objective evidence, ratably over the period during which the obligation exists, typically 12 months. These arrangements are generally renewable annually by the customer.

 

From time to time, a licensee may cancel a project during the development phase. Such a cancellation is not within the Company’s control and is often caused by changes in market conditions or the licensee’s business. Cancellations of this nature are an aspect of the Company’s licensing business, and, in general, its license contracts allow the Company to retain all payments that the Company has received or is entitled to collect for items and services provided before the cancellation occurs. Typically under the Company’s license agreements, the licensee is obligated to complete the project within a stated timeframe, including assisting the Company in completing the final milestone. If the Company performs the contracted services, the licensee is obligated to pay the license fees even if the licensee fails to complete verification or cancels the project prior to completion. For accounting purposes the Company will consider a project to have been canceled even in the absence of specific notice from its licensee if there has been no activity under the contract for six months or longer and the Company believes that completion of the contract is unlikely. In this event, the Company recognizes revenue in the amount of cash received, if the Company has performed a sufficient portion of the development services. If a cancelled contract had been entered into before the establishment of technological feasibility, the costs associated with the contract would have been expensed prior to the recognition of revenue. In that case, there would be no costs associated with that revenue recognition, and gross margin would increase for the corresponding period. No license revenue was recognized from cancelled contracts for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

 

The Company also recognizes prepaid pre-production royalties as license revenues. These are lump sum payments made when the Company enters into licensing agreements that cover future shipments of a product that is not commercially available from the licensee. The Company characterizes such payments as license revenues because they are paid as part of the initial license fee and not with respect to products being produced by the licensee.  These payments are non-cancelable and non-refundable.  No revenue from prepaid production royalties was recognized for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008.

 

Royalty

 

The Company’s licensing contracts also provide for royalties based on licensees’ use of our technology in their currently shipping commercial products. The Company generally recognizes royalties in the quarter in which it receives the licensee’s report. The Company may also recognize prepaid post-production royalties as revenue upon execution of the contract, which are paid in a lump sum after the licensee commences production of the royalty-bearing product and applied against future unit shipments regardless of the actual level of shipments by the licensee. The criteria for revenue recognition of prepaid royalties are that a formal agreement with the licensee is executed, no deliverables, development or support services related to prepaid royalties are required, the fees are non-refundable and not contingent upon future product shipments by the licensee, and the fees are payable by the licensee in a time period consistent with the Company’s normal billing terms. If any of these criteria are not met, the Company defers revenue recognition until such time as all criteria have been met.

 

8

Table of Contents

 

Cost of revenue

 

Cost of licensing revenue consists primarily of engineering personnel and overhead allocation costs directly related to development services specified in agreements. These services typically include customization of the Company’s technologies for the licensee’s particular integrated circuit design and may include engineering support to assist in the commencement of production of a licensee’s products. The Company recognizes cost of licensing revenue in the following manner:

 

·                  If licensing revenue is recognized using the percentage of completion method, the associated cost of licensing revenue is recognized in the period in which the Company incurs the engineering costs.

 

·                  If licensing revenue is recognized using the completed contract method, to the extent that the amount of engineering cost does not exceed the amount of the related licensing revenue, the cost of licensing revenue is deferred on a contract-by-contract basis from the time the Company has established technological feasibility of the product to be developed under the license contract. Technological feasibility is established when the Company has completed all activities necessary to demonstrate that the licensee’s product can be produced to meet the performance specifications when incorporating its technology. Deferred costs are charged to cost of licensing revenue when the related revenue is recognized.

 

Purchased Intangible Assets

 

Intangible assets acquired in business combinations are accounted for based on the fair value of assets purchased and are amortized over the period in which economic benefit is estimated to be received. Identifiable intangible assets (see Note 5) were as follows as of June 30, 2009 (dollar amounts in thousands):

 

		Life (years)		Gross Carrying Amount			Accumulated Amortization			Net Carrying Value
Developed technology		3		$	4,800		$	110		$	4,690
Customer relationships		3		390			9			381
Contract backlog		1		750			52			698
Non-compete agreements		1.5		140			6			134
Total				$	6,080		$	177		$	5,903

 

The related amortization expense was $0.2 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009. Amortization expense was $0.2 million and $0.4 million for the three and six months ended June 30, 2008, respectively.  Amortization expense has been included in research and development expense.  The estimated aggregate amortization expense to be recognized in future years is approximately $1.3 million for the remainder of 2009, $2.1 million for 2010, $1.8 million for 2011 and $0.7 million for 2012.

 

Per Share Amounts

 

Basic net loss per share is computed by dividing net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding during the period. Diluted net loss per share gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period. Potential common shares are composed of incremental shares of common stock issuable upon the exercise of stock options or restricted stock awards. As of June 30, 2009 and 2008, stock awards to purchase 10.0 million and 7.9 million shares, respectively, were excluded from computation of diluted net loss per share as their inclusion would be anti-dilutive.

 

Comprehensive Loss

 

Comprehensive loss, as defined, includes all changes in equity (net assets) during a period from non-owner sources. The components of comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, were as follows (in thousands):

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009			2008			2009			2008
Net loss		$	(5,134	)	$	(4,590	)	$	(9,213	)	$	(8,874	)
Change in net unrealized gains/(loss) on available-for-sale securities		53			(330		)	(70		)	(671		)
Comprehensive loss		$	(5,081	)	$	(4,920	)	$	(9,283	)	$	(9,545	)

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

 

In April 2009, the FASB issued FASB Staff Position (FSP) No. 141R-1 (FSP No. 141R-1), “Accounting for Assets Acquired and Liabilities Assumed in a Business Combination That Arise from Contingencies.” FSP No. 141R-1 amends the provisions in SFAS No. 141(R) for the initial recognition and measurement, subsequent measurement and accounting, and disclosures for assets and

 

9

Table of Contents

 

liabilities arising from contingencies in business combinations. FSP No. 141R-1 eliminates the distinction between contractual and non-contractual contingencies, including the initial recognition and measurement criteria in SFAS No. 141(R) and instead carries forward most of the provisions in SFAS No. 141 for acquired contingencies. FSP No. 141R-1 is effective for contingent assets and contingent liabilities acquired in business combinations for which the acquisition date is on or after the beginning of the first annual reporting period beginning on or after December 15, 2008. The Company applied SFAS No. 141(R) to its acquisition of Prism Circuits, Inc. completed in June 2009 (see Note 5).

 

In April 2009, the FASB issued three related Staff Positions: (i) FSP 157-4 (FSP 157-4), “Determining Fair Value When the Volume and Level of Activity for the Asset or Liability have Significantly Decreased and Identifying Transactions That Are Not Orderly,” (ii) FSP 115-2 and FSP 124-2 (FSP 115-2 and FSP 124-2), “Recognition and Presentation of Other-Than-Temporary Impairments,” and (iii) SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 (SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1),”Interim Disclosures about Fair Value of Financial Instruments,” which were effective for the Company’s second quarter of 2009.  FSP 157-4 provides guidance on how to determine the fair value of assets and liabilities under SFAS No. 157 in the current economic environment and reemphasizes that the objective of a fair value measurement remains an exit price. FSP 115-2 and 124-2 provide operational guidance for determining other-than-temporary impairments for debt securities.  SFAS No. 107-1 and APB 28-1 enhance the disclosure of instruments under the scope of SFAS No. 157 for both interim and annual periods. The adoption of these accounting pronouncements did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or operating results.

 

In May 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 165 (SFAS No. 165), “Subsequent Events,” which establishes general standards of accounting and disclosure for events that occur after the balance sheet date but before financial statements are issued or are available to be issued. SFAS No. 165 requires entities to disclose the date through which subsequent events were evaluated and the basis for that date.  SFAS No. 165 is effective for interim and annual periods ending after June 15, 2009, and accordingly, the Company adopted this standard during the second quarter of 2009.  The adoption of SFAS No. 165 did not have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or operating results.

 

In June 2009, the FASB issued SFAS No. 168 (SFAS No. 168), “The FASB Accounting Standards Codification and the Hierarchy of Generally Accepted Accounting Principles—a replacement of FASB Statement No. 162.” SFAS No. 168 establishes the FASB Accounting Standards Codification (the Codification) as the source of authoritative U.S. GAAP recognized by the FASB to be applied by nongovernmental entities. Rules and interpretive releases of the SEC under authority of federal securities laws are also sources of authoritative GAAP for SEC registrants. On the effective date of SFAS No. 168, the Codification will supersede all then-existing non-SEC accounting and reporting standards. All other non-grandfathered non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification will become non-authoritative. SFAS No. 168 is effective for financial statements issued for interim and annual periods ending after September 15, 2009. Adoption of SFAS No. 168 is not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s financial condition or operating results.

 

Note 2: Fair Value of Financial Instruments

 

The estimated fair values of financial instruments outstanding, excluding auction-rate securities and a related right from UBS (see below in this Note 2), were as follows (in thousands):

 

		June 30, 2009
		Cost			Unrealized Gains			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents		$	4,274		$	—		$	—		$	4,274
Short-term investments:
Corporate notes		$	4,020		$	25		$	—		$	4,045
U.S. government agency and municipal bonds		16,609			127			—			16,736
Total short-term investments		$	20,629		$	152		$	—		$	20,781
Long-term investments:
Corporate notes		$	3,318		$	13		$	(5	)	$	3,326
U.S. government agency and municipal bonds		9,101			50			—			9,151
Total long-term investments		$	12,419		$	63		$	(5	)	$	12,477

 

10

Table of Contents

 

		December 31, 2008
		Cost			Unrealized Gains			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Cash and cash equivalents		$	17,515		$	—		$	—		$	17,515
Short-term investments:
Corporate notes and commercial paper		$	8,524		$	14		$	(6	)	$	8,532
U.S. government agency and municipal bonds		17,922			106			—			18,028
Total short-term investments		$	26,446		$	120		$	(6	)	$	26,560
Long-term investments:
Corporate notes		$	3,529		$	—		$	(38	)	$	3,491
U.S. government agency and municipal bonds		12,181			204			—			12,385
Total long-term investments		$	15,710		$	204		$	(38	)	$	15,876

 

Cost and fair value of investments, excluding auction-rate securities, based on three maturity groups at June 30, 2009 were as follows (in thousands):

 

		Cost			Unrealized Gains			Unrealized Losses			Fair Value
Due within 1 year		$	20,629		$	152		$	—		$	20,781
Due in 1-2 years		12,419			63			(5		)	12,477
Due in greater than 2 years		—			—			—			—
Total		$	33,048		$	215		$	(5	)	$	33,258

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 157, the Company used the concepts of fair value based on estimated discounted future cash flows to value its auction-rate securities that included the following significant inputs and considerations:

 

·                  projected interest income and principal payments through the expected holding period;

 

·                  a market risk adjusted discount rate, which was based on actual securities traded in the open market that had similar collateral composition to the auction-rate securities as of June 30, 2009, adjusted for an expected yield premium to compensate for the current lack of liquidity resulting from failing auctions for such securities; and

 

·                  no default or collateral value risk adjustments were considered for the discount rate, because most of the issuers were AAA-rated by nationally recognized rating agencies at June 30, 2009, and the auction-rate securities were collateralized by student loans, the repayments of which were substantially guaranteed by the U.S. Department of Education.

 

The following table represents the Company’s fair value hierarchy for its financial assets (cash equivalents, investments and the right from UBS related to the auction-rate securities) and for an acquisition-related earn-out payment liability as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands):

 

		June 30, 2009
		Fair Value			Level 1			Level 2			Level 3
Money market funds		$	3,285		$	3,285		$	—		$	—
Corporate debt securities		7,371			—			7,371			—
U.S. government agency and municipal bonds		25,887			—			25,887			—
Auction-rate securities		7,908			—			—			7,908
Right from UBS		1,178			—			—			1,178
Total assets		$	45,629		$	3,285		$	33,258		$	9,086
Acquisition-related earn-out payment liability		4,550			—			—			4,550
Total liabilities		$	4,550		$	—		$	—		$	4,550

 

11

Table of Contents

 

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s assets measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands):

 

		Fair Value
Balance at December 31, 2008		$	9,120
Transfers to (from) Level 3		––
Realized loss on right from UBS included in earnings		(400		)
Realized gain on auction-rate securities included in earnings		400
Balance at March 31, 2009		$	9,120
Sale of Level 3 securities		(50		)
Realized loss on right from UBS included in earnings		(22		)
Realized gain on auction-rate securities included in earnings		38
Balance at June 30, 2009		$	9,086

 

The following table provides a summary of changes in fair value of the Company’s liabilities measured at fair value using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3) for the six months ended June 30, 2009 (in thousands):

 

		Fair Value
Balance at March 31, 2009		$	––
Transfers to (from) Level 3		4,550
Balance at June 30, 2009		$	4,550

 

As of June 30, 2009, the Company has classified $7.9 million (net of $1.2 million in realized losses) of its auction-rate securities as long-term investments due to the disruption in the credit markets that resulted in widespread failed auctions. Those failed auctions resulted in a loss of liquidity for sellers but did not constitute a default by the issuer of the underlying security. Most of the issuers of the Company’s auction-rate securities had AAA credit ratings at June 30, 2009, the securities are collateralized by student loans substantially guaranteed by the U.S. government, and the issuers continue to pay interest in accordance with the contractual terms of the securities.

 

On November 11, 2008, the Company accepted an offer, or right, from UBS Financial Services, Inc. (UBS) by which UBS will purchase the auction-rate securities from the Company, at the Company’s election, at par value at any time during the period from June 30, 2010 through July 2, 2012. Prior to June 30, 2010, UBS can redeem the securities at par value at its sole election. Additionally, the auction-rate securities are still subject to redemptions by the underlying issuers at any time. As a result of its acceptance of the right, the Company no longer has the intent to hold the securities until maturity and the purchase of the securities by UBS may occur before the markets for these securities recover. Therefore, the Company classifies the auction-rate securities as trading securities. In the first six months of 2009, the Company recorded a realized gain on these auction-rate securities of $0.4 million. However, the Company can elect to have UBS purchase the auction-rate securities from it, therefore has accounted for the right as a separate freestanding financial asset measured at fair value, resulting in the recording of a long-term other asset in the condensed consolidated balance sheet with an offsetting loss of approximately $0.4 million included in the other income, net, line item in the condensed consolidated statements of operations.

 

The Company valued the right using a discounted cash flow approach including estimates, based on data available as of June 30, 2009, of interest rates, timing and amount of cash flows, adjusted for any bearer risk associated with UBS’s financial ability to repurchase the auction-rate securities beginning June 30, 2010. These assumptions are volatile and subject to change as the underlying sources of these assumptions and market conditions change. The Company has elected to account for the right at fair value in accordance with SFAS No. 159 (SFAS No. 159), “The Fair Value Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, Including an Amendment of FASB Statement No. 115,” and will be required to assess the fair value of these two individual assets and record changes each period until the right is exercised or the auction-rate securities are redeemed. The Company will continue to classify the auction-rate securities as long-term investments until one year prior to the expected settlement.

 

Note 3. Commitments and Contingencies

 

Indemnifications

 

In the ordinary course of business, the Company enters into contractual arrangements under which it may agree to indemnify the counter-parties from any losses incurred relating to breach of representations and warranties, failure to perform certain covenants, or claims and losses arising from certain events as outlined within the particular contract, which may include, for example, losses arising from litigation or claims relating to past performance. Such indemnification clauses may not be subject to maximum loss clauses. The Company has entered into indemnification agreements with its officers and directors. No amounts were reflected in the Company’s condensed consolidated financial statements for the three or six months ended June 30, 2009 or 2008 related to these indemnifications.

 

12

 

 

Table of Contents

 

The Company has not estimated the maximum potential amount of indemnification liability under these agreements due to the limited history of prior claims and the unique facts and circumstances applicable to each particular agreement. To date, the Company has not made any payments related to these indemnification agreements.

 

Legal Matters

 

The Company is not a party to any material legal proceeding which would have a material adverse effect on its condensed consolidated financial position or results of operations. From time to time the Company may be subject to legal proceedings and claims in the ordinary course of business. These claims, even if not meritorious, could result in the expenditure of significant financial resources and diversion of management efforts.

 

Note 4. Restructuring Charge and Accruals

 

The Company has recorded restructuring charges in accordance with the guidance of SFAS No. 146, “Accounting for Costs Associated with Exit or Disposal Activities.” These restructuring charges and accruals are monitored on at least a quarterly basis for changes in circumstances and any corresponding adjustments to the accrual are recorded in the Company’s condensed consolidated statements of operations in the period when such changes are known.

 

In the fourth quarter of 2008, the Company announced and initiated a plan to exit its unprofitable and non-core analog/mixed-signal product lines, resulting in the elimination of approximately 90 employees and closure of subsidiaries in China and Romania.

 

In the first quarter of 2009, the Company recorded restructuring charges of $275,000, which were primarily related to employee terminations, costs to exit a leased facility in China and other costs related to closing the analog/mixed-signal subsidiaries. Total restructuring charges resulting from the exit of the analog/mixed-signal product lines were $1.6 million, and the Company does not expect to incur additional restructuring charges related to this exit initiative. The remaining accrued expenditures are expected to be paid in the third quarter of 2009.

 

In June 2009, the Company announced and initiated a plan to close its Korea research and development office resulting in the elimination of 15 positions.  The Company recorded restructuring charges of $280,000 in the second quarter of 2009, which were primarily related to employee terminations, costs to exit the leased facility and other costs related to closing the subsidiaries. The Company does not expect to incur additional restructuring charges related to the Korea office, and all remaining cash expenditures are expected to be paid in the third and fourth quarters of 2009.

 

In addition, restructuring charges of $151,000 were recorded in connection with the plan to exit the leased facility that was occupied by the newly acquired employees of Prism Circuits, Inc. (see Note 5).

 

Restructuring activity as of and for three and six months ended June 30, 2009 was as follows (in thousands):

 

		Workforce reductions			Facility-related and other termination costs			Asset impairments			Total
Balance at December 31, 2008		$	972		$	32		$	—		$	1,004
Restructuring charge		51			211			13			275
Non-cash settlements		—			(71		)	(13		)	(84		)
Cash payments		(917		)	(8		)	—			(925		)
Balance at March 31, 2009		$	106		$	164		$	—		$	270
New restructuring charges		165			228			38			431
Non-cash settlements		—			––			(38		)	(38		)
Cash payments		(106		)	(84		)	—			(190		)
Balance at June 30, 2009		$	165		$	308		$	—		$	473

 

Costs related to workforce reductions primarily represented severance payments and related payroll taxes and benefits. Facility costs and other costs primarily include termination fees related to leases, lease payments to be incurred until termination of the leases and services. Non-cash settlement costs include the write-off of fixed assets and software licenses that are not expected to generate future cash flows.

 

13

Table of Contents

 

Note 5. Acquisition of Prism Circuits, Inc.

 

On June 5, 2009, the Company acquired substantially all the assets of and business of Prism Circuits, Inc. (Prism Circuits), a provider of semiconductor interface IP.  The acquisition significantly expanded the Company’s product portfolio by adding high speed multi-protocol compliant interface IP, which enables communication between semiconductors in a system. The Company believes the integration of its patented memory IP and the newly acquired differentiated interface IP will allow it to provide a more comprehensive and competitive solution to its customers, especially in the networking and communications markets.  With the acquisition, the Company added over fifty engineers experienced in interface IP development and analog/mixed-signal applications.

 

Under the terms of the acquisition agreement, the Company paid Prism Circuits at closing $15.0 million in cash (offset by approximately $1.4 million of cash it acquired) and assumed certain liabilities of Prism Circuits as consideration for the acquired assets.  The Company also agreed to pay up to an additional $6.5 million of cash (the Earn-Out Payment) shortly after the first anniversary of the closing date, contingent upon the Company’s achievement of certain objectives relating to the Prism Circuits business during that twelve-month period.  In addition, the Company granted options to purchase up to 3.6 million shares of the Company’s common stock to the newly hired Prism Circuits employees as inducements material to employment in accordance with NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5635(c)(4), in accordance with the terms of the acquisition agreement.  The majority of these options will vest on a straight-line basis over forty-eight months subject to continued employment requirements.

 

If and to the extent earned, the Earn-Out Payment will be paid to Prism Circuits in the third quarter of 2010.  The objectives for the Earn-Out Payment relate to:

 

·                  billing and collection by the Company of amounts payable under customer contracts assumed by the Company;

·                  the achievement of specific product development milestones in accordance with a mutually agreed-upon schedule; and

·                  the retention by the Company of certain key employees formerly employed by Prism Circuits.

 

As thirty percent of the Earn-Out Payment may be earned by the shareholders of Prism Circuits based on the Company’s future employment of individuals, the amount allocated to this objective, or $1.95 million, is not considered to be a component of the acquisition price and is being recognized as compensation expense and accrued on a straight-line basis over the one-year period subsequent to the acquisition. For the three months ended June 30, 2009, the Company recorded $134,000 of expense and liability for the retention objective.  The remaining portion of the Earn-out Payment, or $4.55 million, is included in the acquisition price because the Company expects that it is more likely than not that the objectives related to this Earn-out Payment will be met.

 

The Company recorded a total acquisition price as follows (in thousands):

 

Cash		$	15,000
Acquisition-related earnout		4,550
Total acquisition price		$	19,550

 

The allocation of the acquisition price for net tangible and intangible assets is as follows (in thousands):

 

Net tangible assets		$	3,212
Identifiable intangible assets:
Developed technology		4,800
Customer relationships		390
Contract backlog		750
Non-compete agreements		140
Goodwill		10,258
Total acquisition price		$	19,550

 

14

Table of Contents

 

The developed technology asset is attributable to products which have reached technological feasibility.  The value of the developed technology was determined by discounting estimated net future cash flows of the products.

 

The customer relationships asset is attributable to the Company’s ability and intent to sell existing, in process and future versions of the acquired products to the existing customers of Prism Circuits.  The value of customer relationships was determined by discounting estimated net future cash flows from the customer agreements based on established valuation techniques accepted in the technology industry.

 

The developed technology and customer relationships assets are being amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated lives of three years.

 

 The contract backlog asset is attributable to the value of agreements acquired from Prism Circuits that were in the process of being delivered at the time of acquisition.  The value of the contract backlog was determined by discounting estimated net future cash flows of the milestone payments based on established valuation techniques accepted in the technology industry.  The Company expects to fulfill its obligations under these agreements within the next one year period, therefore this asset is being amortized on a straight-line basis over one year.

 

The non-compete agreements asset is attributable to the non-compete agreements executed by certain former key employees of Prism Circuits that have been employed by the Company and is being amortized on a straight-line basis over the eighteen month terms of the agreements.

 

Goodwill represents the excess of the acquisition price of an acquired business over the fair value of the underlying net tangible and intangible assets. In addition, included in the goodwill amount, is the value of the acquired workforce, which has significant expertise in high-speed interface IP and analog/mixed-signal technology.  The Company will assess goodwill for impairment on at least an annual basis or when there is an indicator of impairment.

 

Note 6. Business Segments and Significant Customers

 

The Company operates in one business segment and uses one measurement of profitability for its business. Revenue attributed to the United States and to all foreign countries is based on the geographical location of the customer. The Company recognized revenue from sales of its products and the licensing of its technologies to customers in North America, Asia and Europe as follows (in thousands):

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,						Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009			2008			2009			2008
Japan		$	1,466		$	2,101		$	3,067		$	3,965
United States		396			353			963			667
Taiwan		82			352			369			647
Asia		37			313			124			464
Europe		––			76			24			269
Total		$	1,981		$	3,195		$	4,547		$	6,012

 

Customers who accounted for at least 10% of total revenues were as follows:

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009		2008		2009		2008
Customer A		57	%	60	%	53	%	59	%
Customer B		11	%	––		9	%	––
Customer C		5	%	9	%	8	%	10	%

 

One customer accounted for 82% of net accounts receivable at June 30, 2009. Five customers accounted for 87% of net accounts receivable at December 31, 2008.

 

15

Table of Contents

 

Note 7. Provision for Income Taxes

 

The Company accounts for income taxes under the provisions of SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes.” Under SFAS No. 109, the Company determines deferred tax assets and liabilities based upon the differences between the financial statement and tax bases of the Company’s assets and liabilities using tax rates in effect for the year in which the Company expects the differences to affect taxable income. A valuation allowance is established for any deferred tax assets for which it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  The Company files U.S. federal, state and foreign income tax returns in jurisdictions with varying statutes of limitations.  The Company is currently undergoing an examination of its income tax returns in California, Canada and France.  Management believes that there is minimal risk of a material adjustment in any of these jurisdictions.  The 2005 through 2008 tax years generally remain subject to examination by federal, state, and foreign tax authorities.  As of June 30, 2009, the Company did not have any unrecognized tax benefits and did not expect its unrecognized tax benefits to change significantly over the next twelve months. The Company recognizes interest related to unrecognized tax benefits in its income tax expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits as other income and expenses. During the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, the Company did not recognize any interest or penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits.

 

Note 8. Stock-Based Compensation

 

In accordance with SFAS No. 123 (revised 2004) (SFAS 123(R)), “Share-Based Payment,” the Company recorded $0.8 million and $1.3 million of stock-based compensation expense for the three months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The Company recorded $1.2 million and $2.6 million of stock-based compensation expense for the six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, respectively. The expense of these awards is recognized on a straight-line basis over the requisite service period, usually the vesting period, based on the grant-date fair value. The unamortized compensation cost, net of expected forfeitures, as of June 30, 2009 was $7.5 million and is expected to be recognized as expense over a weighted average period of approximately 3.34 years.

 

SFAS 123(R) requires the Company to present the tax benefits resulting from tax deductions in excess of the compensation cost recognized from the exercise of stock options as financing cash flows in the condensed consolidated statements of cash flows. For the three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008, there were no such tax benefits associated with the exercise of stock options due to the Company’s loss position.

 

Valuation Assumptions and Expense Information under SFAS 123(R)

 

As prescribed in SFAS 123(R), the fair value of the Company’s share-based payment awards for three and six months ended June 30, 2009 and 2008 was estimated on the grant date using a Black-Scholes valuation method and an option-pricing model with the following assumptions:

 

		Three Months Ended June 30,				Six Months Ended June 30,
		2009		2008		2009		2008
Employee stock options:
Risk-free interest rate		1.5% – 2.1%		2.9% – 3.5%		1.2% – 2.1%		1.9% – 3.5%
Volatility		57.0% – 58.8%		49.2% – 50.7%		55.7% – 58.8%		48.5% – 53.6%
Expected life (years)		4.0		4.0		4.0		4.0
Dividend yield		0%		0%		0%		0%

 

The risk-free interest rate was derived from the Daily Treasury Yield Curve Rates as published by the U.S. Department of the Treasury as of the grant date for terms equal to the expected terms of the options. The expected volatility was based on the combination of historical volatility, excluding the volatility during the period of a one-time non-recurring event, which was the aborted acquisition of the Company by Synopsys, Inc. in 2004 impacting certain options granted in 2008, and implied volatility of the Company’s stock price. The expected term of options granted was derived from historical data based on employee exercises and post-vesting employment termination behavior. A dividend yield of zero is applied since the Company has never paid dividends and has no intention to pay dividends in the near future.

 

As required by SFAS 123(R), the stock-based compensation expense is calculated based on estimated forfeiture rate. An annualized forfeiture rate has been used as a best estimate of future forfeitures based on the Company’s historical forfeiture experience. Under the true-up provisions of SFAS 123(R), the stock-based compensation expense will be adjusted in later periods if the actual forfeiture rate is different from the estimate.

 

16

Table of Contents

 

A summary of the option and restricted stock award (RSA) activity under the Company’s 1996 Stock Plan and Amended and Restated 2000 Stock Option and Equity Incentive Plan (Amended 2000 Plan) is presented below (in thousands, except exercise price):

 

		Options Outstanding
		Available for Grant		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Prices
Balance at December 31, 2008		2,071		4,802		$	6.38
Additional authorized under the Amended 2000 Plan		500		—		—
Options granted		(221	)	221		$	1.89
Options cancelled		278		(278	)	$	5.93
Balance at March 31, 2009		2,628		4,745		$	6.20
Options granted		(195	)	195		$	1.79
Options cancelled		351		(351	)	$	6.04
Balance at June 30, 2009		2,784		4,589		$	6.02

 

The Company may also award shares to new employees outside the Amended 2000 Plan, as material inducements to the acceptance of employment with the Company in accordance with NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 5635(c)(4). These grants must be approved by the compensation committee of the board of directors, a majority of the independent directors or an authorized executive officer, as determined under the Marketplace Rules of the Nasdaq Stock Market.

 

A summary of the inducement grant option activity is presented below (in thousands, except exercise price):

 

		Options Outstanding
		Number of  Shares		Weighted Average Exercise Prices
Balance at December 31, 2008		2,107		$	4.99
Cancelled		(251	)	$	3.76
Balance at March 31, 2009		1,856		$	5.15
Granted		3,398		$	1.55
Cancelled		(51	)	$	3.59
Balance at June 30, 2009		5,203		$	2.85

 

A summary of the restricted stock award and restricted stock unit activity is presented below (in thousands, except fair value):

 

		Number of Shares		Weighted Average Grant-Date Fair Value
Non-vested shares at December 31, 2008		272		$	7.01
Vested		(13	)	$	5.91
Cancelled		(103	)	$	7.07
Non-vested shares at March 31, 2009		156		$	7.07
Granted		21		$	1.55
Non-vested shares at June 30, 2009		177		$	6.41

 

The following table summarizes significant ranges of outstanding and exercisable options and inducement grants as of June 30, 2009 (in thousands, except contractual life and exercise price):

 

		Options Outstanding										Options Exercisable
Range of Exercise Price		Number Outstanding		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic value			Number Exercisable		Weighted Average Remaining Contractual Life (in Years)		Weighted Average Exercise Price			Aggregate Intrinsic value
$1.00 - $4.09		5,035		5.60		$	2.08		$	344		851		5.12		$	3.81		$	1
$4.10 - $8.00		3,387		5.21		$	5.65		—			2,034		5.35		$	5.82		—
$8.01 - $10.00		1,085		2.73		$	8.80		—			803		3.03		$	8.94		—
$10.01 - $15.69		285		1.18		$	11.04		—			285		2.10		$	11.04		—
		9,792		5.02		$	4.32		$	344		3,973		4.60		$	6.40		$	1

 

17