Performant Financial Corp - Annual Report: 2019 (Form 10-K)
UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C. 20549
FORM 10-K
(Mark One)
x | ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019
or
¨ | TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934 |
For the transition period from to
Commission File Number: 001-35628
PERFORMANT FINANCIAL CORPORATION
(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware | 20-0484934 |
(State or other jurisdiction of incorporation or organization) | (I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
333 North Canyons Parkway, Livermore, CA | 94551 |
(Address of principal executive offices) | (Zip Code) |
Registrant’s telephone number, including area code: (925) 960-4800
Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:
Title of each class: | Trading Symbol(s) | Name of each exchange on which registered: |
Common Stock, par value $.0001 per share | PFMT | The Nasdaq Stock Market LLC |
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (section 232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). Yes x No ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large accelerated filer | ¨ | Accelerated filer | ¨ |
Non-accelerated filer | ¨ (Do not check if a smaller reporting company) | Smaller reporting company | x |
Emerging growth company | ¨ | ||
If an emerging growth company, indicate by check mark if the registrant has elected not to use the extended transition period for complying with any new or revised financial accounting standards provided pursuant to Section 13(a) of the Exchange Act. ¨
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
As of June 30, 2019 (the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed second quarter), the aggregate market value of the common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was $19,812,518. Shares of common stock beneficially held by each officer and director and by each person who owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded in that such persons may be deemed to be affiliates. This determination of affiliate status is not necessarily a conclusive determination for other purposes.
As of April 28, 2020, 54,028,174 shares of the registrant’s common stock were outstanding.
Documents Incorporated By Reference
Items 10 through 14 in Part III of this Form 10-K are incorporated by reference to the Registrant’s definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies from the Registrant’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
EXPLANATORY NOTE
This Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2019 is being filed pursuant to the order of the Securities and Exchange Commission contained in SEC Release No. 34-88465, dated March 25, 2020 (the “Order”). We filed a Form 8-K on March 30, 2020, the original due date of the Form 10-K, indicating our reliance on the relief granted by the Order.
TABLE OF CONTENTS
Page | ||
2
PART I
Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains, in addition to historical information, certain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. All statements other than statements of historical fact contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, including statements regarding our future results of operations and financial position, strategy and plans, and our expectations for future operations, are forward-looking statements. The words “believe,” “may,” “estimate,” “continue,” “anticipate,” “design,” “intend,” “expect” and similar expressions are intended to identify forward-looking statements. We have based these forward-looking statements largely on our current expectations and projections about future events and trends that we believe may affect our financial condition, results of operations, strategy, short-term and long-term business operations and objectives, and financial needs. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to, statements about:
• | our opportunities and expectations for growth in the healthcare, student lending, and other markets; |
• | anticipated trends and challenges in our business and competition in the markets in which we operate; |
• | our existing client relationships and future growth opportunities; |
• | the adaptability of our technology platform to new markets and processes; |
• | our ability to invest in and utilize our data and analytics capabilities to expand our capabilities; |
• | our growth strategy of expanding in our existing markets and considering strategic alliances or acquisitions; |
• | our indebtedness and our compliance, or failure to comply, with restrictive covenants in our credit agreement; |
• | our ability to meet our liquidity and working capital needs; |
• | maintaining, protecting and enhancing our intellectual property; |
• | our expectations regarding future expenses; |
• | expected future financial performance; and |
• | our ability to comply with and adapt to industry regulations and compliance demands. |
These statements reflect current views with respect to future events and are based on assumptions and subject to risks and uncertainties. There are a variety of factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from the anticipated results or expectations expressed in our forward-looking statements. There may be other factors of which the Company is not currently aware that may affect matters discussed in the forward-looking statements and may also cause actual results to differ materially from those discussed. In addition, there is uncertainty about the spread of the COVID-19 virus and the impact it may have on the Company’s operations, the demand for the Company’s products or services, global supply chains and economic activity in general. These risks and uncertainties include, but are not limited to, those risks discussed in Item 1A of this report. Given these uncertainties, you should not place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements.
Forward-looking statements contained in this report present management’s views only as of the date of this report. We undertake no obligation to publicly update forward-looking statements, whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. You are advised, however, to consult any further disclosures we make on related subjects in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
1
ITEM 1. Business
Overview
We provide technology-enabled audit, recovery, outsource customer services, and related analytics services in the United States. Our services help identify improper payments, and in some markets, restructure and recover delinquent or defaulted assets and improper payments for both government and private clients in a broad range of markets. Our clients typically operate in complex and regulated environments and outsource their audit and recovery needs in order to reduce losses on billions of dollars of improper healthcare payments, delinquent state and federal tax and federal treasury, defaulted student loans and other receivables. We also provide complex outsource customer services for clients across our various markets, where we handle many or all aspects of our clients’ recovery processes.
We believe we have a leading position in our markets based on our technology-enabled services platform, long-standing client relationships and the large volume of claims or funds we have audited and recovered for our clients. In the healthcare market, we have been a Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC), in the United States for the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), for over ten years, and are currently servicing two RAC contracts and an additional Medicare Secondary Payer Commercial Repayment Center (CRC) contract. We have also expanded our client base to include multiple insurance providers in the private healthcare market. In the recovery market, we have relationships with several U.S. federal government agencies, including the IRS, state tax agencies as well as a large number of the active Guaranty Agencies (GAs), which are state or non-profit agencies that administer and rehabilitate student loans issued under the former federally-governed student loan program.
We believe that our business platform is easily adaptable to new markets and processes. Over the past several years, we have successfully extended our platform into additional markets with significant recovery opportunities. For example, we utilized the same basic platform previously used primarily for student loan recovery activities to enter the state tax, federal treasury receivables and healthcare recovery markets. We continue to enhance our platform through investment in new data and analytics capabilities, which we believe will enable us to provide additional services such as services relating to the detection of fraud, waste and abuse. We endeavor to automate and optimize what traditionally have been manually intensive processes in order to drive higher workforce productivity. In 2019, we generated approximately $85,000 of revenue per employee, based on the average number of employees during the year.
Our revenue model is generally success-based as we earn fees based on a percentage of the aggregate correct audits, and/or amount of funds that we enable our clients to recover. Our services do not require any significant upfront investments by our clients, and we offer our clients the opportunity to recover significant funds otherwise lost. Because our model is based upon the success of our efforts, our business objectives are aligned with those of our clients and we are generally not reliant on their spending budgets. Furthermore, our business model does not require significant capital as we do not purchase loans or obligations.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, we generated approximately $150.4 million in revenues, $26.8 million in net loss, $(3.2) million in adjusted EBITDA and $(20.0) million in adjusted net loss. See “Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations - Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Income” in Item 7 below for a definition of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net income and reconciliations of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss to net loss determined in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.
2
Our Markets
We operate in markets characterized by strong growth, a complex regulatory environment and a significant amount of delinquent, defaulted or improperly paid assets.
Healthcare
The healthcare industry represents a significant portion of the U.S. Gross Domestic Product (GDP). According to CMS National Health Expenditure (NHE) Projections, U.S. healthcare spending grew 4.5% in 2019, reaching $3.8 trillion. National health spending is projected to grow at an average annual rate of 5.4% for 2020-28 and to reach nearly $6.2 trillion by 2028. As a share of the nation's GDP, health spending accounted for 17.8% in 2019 and expected to increase to 19.4% by 2027. Federal government-related spending grew 6.7% to $800.5 billion in 2019 for Medicare, which provides a range of healthcare coverage primarily to elderly and disabled Americans and grew 3.9% to $620.7 billion in 2019 for Medicaid, which provides federal matching funds for states to finance healthcare for individuals at or below the public assistance level.
Medicare was initially established as part of the Social Security Act of 1965 and consists of four parts: Part A covers hospital and other inpatient stays; Part B covers hospital outpatient, physician and other services; Part C is known as Medicare Advantage, under which beneficiaries receive benefits through private health plans; and Part D is the Medicare outpatient prescription drug benefit.
The Department of Health and Human Services estimated that for Medicare Part A and Part B spending in 2019, approximately $28.9 billion, or 7.3%, was improper. Medicare improper payments generally involve incorrect coding, procedures performed which were not medically necessary, and incomplete documentation or claims submitted based on outdated fee schedules, among other issues.
In accordance with the Medicare Prescription Drug, Improvement, and Modernization Act of 2003, a demonstration program was conducted from March 2005 to March 2008 in six states to determine if recovery audit contractors could be effectively used to identify improper payments for claims paid under Medicare Part A and Part B. Due to the success of this demonstration, under The Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, the U.S. Congress authorized the expansion of the recovery audit program nationwide. CMS relies on third-party contractors to execute the recovery audit program to analyze millions of Medicare claims annually for improper payments to healthcare providers. The program was implemented by designating one prime contractor in each of the four major regions in the United States: West, Midwest, South, and Northeast. Contracts with recovery audit contractors, or RACs, were initially awarded in 2009. These contracts effectively expired in 2016 and new contracts were awarded in October 2016.
In addition to government-related healthcare spending, significant growth in spending is expected in the private healthcare market. According to CMS NHE Projections, the private healthcare market accounted for approximately $1.3 trillion in spending in 2019, and private expenditures are projected to grow by 5.2% in 2020, 4.6% per year on average for 2021-23, and 5.0% per year on average for 2024-28.
Student Lending
Government-supported student loans are authorized under Title IV of the Higher Education Act of 1965. Historically, there have been two distribution channels for student loans: (i) the Federal Direct Student Loan Program, or FDSLP, which represents loans made and managed directly by the Department of Education; and (ii) the Federal Family Education Loan Program, or FFELP, which represents loans made by private institutions and currently backed by any of the 25 GAs.
In July 2010, the government-supported student loan sector underwent a structural change with the passage of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, or SAFRA. This legislation transitioned all new government-supported student loan originations to the FDSLP, and away from originations made by private institutions within the FFELP that had previously utilized the GAs to guarantee, manage and service loans. The GAs are non-profit 501(c)(3) public benefit corporations operating under contract with the U.S. Secretary of Education, pursuant to the Higher Education Act of 1965, as amended, solely for the purpose of guaranteeing and managing student loans originated by lenders participating in the FFELP. Consequently, the original distribution channels for student loans have been consolidated solely into the Department of Education. Despite this transition of all new loan originations to the FDSLP, GAs continue to manage a significant amount of defaulted student loans due to their outstanding portfolios of loans originated prior to July 2010. The outstanding portfolios of defaulted FFELP loans managed by the GAs will, therefore, require recovery for the foreseeable future, although at progressively lower volumes.
3
The Department of Education estimates that the balance of defaulted loans was approximately $101.4 billion in the FDSLP and approximately $38.9 billion in the FFELP as of September 30, 2018. The total amount of federally managed loans in default is $140.3 billion. The collective amount of defaulted loans serviced by the GAs as of September 30, 2018 was $26.1 billion. Given the operational and logistical complexity involved in managing the recovery of defaulted student loans, the GAs and the Department of Education have historically chosen to outsource these services to third parties.
State Tax Market
As state governments struggle with revenue generation and face significant budget deficits, many states have focused on recovery of delinquent state taxes. According to the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities, an independent think tank, 31 U.S. states faced projected budget shortfalls totaling $46.1 billion in 2017 and 2018. The economic recession beginning in 2008 led to lower income and sales taxes from both individuals and corporations, reducing overall tax revenues and leading to large budget deficits at the state government level. Although there has been some improvement (from $55 billion in 2013 to $46.1 billion in 2017 and 2018), the budget deficits continue to be a challenge for these states. In light of these budget deficits, many states have evaluated outsourcing at least some aspect of delinquent tax recovery.
Federal Agency Market
The federal agency market consists of government debt subrogated to the Department of the Treasury by numerous different federal agencies, comprising a mix of commercial and individual obligations and a diverse range of receivables. These debts are managed by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (formerly the Department of Financial Management Service), or FS, a bureau of the Department of the Treasury.
Federal Tax Market
The IRS estimates that the difference between the total amount of taxes owed and taxes paid, known as the tax gap, currently exceeds $400 billion. In December 2015, Congress mandated the creation of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) Private Debt Collection (PDC) Program within Section 32102 of the Fixing America’s Surface Transportation Act. The program provides the IRS with resources to assist with the collection of a subset of outstanding tax underpayments, specifically those where a tax return was filed but additional taxes are due. In the spring of 2017, the IRS named us as one of four companies to perform recovery services under the PDC Program. As of September 30, 2019, the PDC Program directly collected $301.7 million in voluntary payments of past-due tax revenue on behalf of the IRS. Tax payments collected by the PDC Program in 2019 was more than double the tax payments collected in 2018.
Our Competitive Strengths
We believe that our business is difficult to replicate, as it incorporates a combination of several important and differentiated elements, including:
• | Scalable and flexible technology-enabled services platform. We have a technology platform that is highly flexible, intuitive and easy to use for our audit, recovery and claims specialists. Our platform is easily configurable and deployable across multiple markets and processes. For example, we have successfully extended our platform from the student loan market to the state and federal tax, federal treasury receivables and the healthcare market, each having its own industry complexities and specific regulations. |
• | Advanced, technology-enabled workflow processes. Our technology-enabled workflow processes, developed over many years of operational experience in recovery services, disaggregate otherwise complex recovery processes into a series of simple, efficient and consistent steps that are easily configurable and applicable to different types of recovery-related applications. We believe our workflow software is highly intuitive and helps our audit, recovery and claims specialists manage each step of the recovery process, while automating a series of otherwise manually-intensive and document-intensive steps in the recovery process. We believe our streamlined workflow technology drives higher efficiencies in our operations, as illustrated by our ability to generate approximately $85,000 of revenues per employee during 2019, based on the average number of employees during the year. We believe our streamlined workflow technology also improves recovery results relative to more labor-intensive outsourcing models. |
4
• | Strong data and analytics capabilities. Our data and analytics capabilities allow us to achieve strong audit results and recovery rates for our clients. We have a proprietary data management and analysis platform which we use throughout our business. In some of our businesses, we have collected recovery-related data for over two decades, which we combine with large volumes of client and third-party data to effectively analyze our clients’ delinquent or defaulted assets and improper payments. We have also developed a number of analytical models for claims auditing, and analytics tools that we use to score our clients’ recovery inventory, determine the optimal recovery process and allocation of resources, and achieve higher levels of recovery results for our clients. In addition, we utilize analytics tools to continuously measure and test our recovery workflow processes to drive refinements and further enhance the quality and effectiveness of our capabilities. |
• | Long-standing client relationships. We believe our long-standing focus on achieving superior recovery performance for our clients and the significant value our clients derive from this focus have helped us achieve long-tenured client relationships, strong contract retention and better access to new clients and future growth opportunities. In the healthcare market, we have a relationship with CMS that exceeds ten years. In October 2016 we were awarded two contracts out of the second recovery audit program procurement process, including for a region consisting of 11 states in the Northeast and Midwest and the national DMEPOS and home health contract. In October 2017, we were awarded a national exclusive (MSP CRC) contract by CMS. In the recovery market, we have business relationships with 14 GAs either as clients or through our contracts with ECMC and Navient and these relationships average more than eight years in length. Further, we have relationships with the U.S. Treasury for 22 years and with Louisiana state tax for 20 years. |
• | Extensive domain expertise in complex and regulated markets. We have extensive experience and domain expertise in providing recovery services for government and private institutions that generally operate in complex and regulated markets. We have demonstrated our ability to develop domain expertise in new markets such as healthcare and state tax and federal Treasury receivables. We believe we have the necessary organizational experience to understand and adapt to evolving public policy and how it shapes the regulatory environment and objectives of our clients. We believe this helps us identify and anticipate growth opportunities. For example, we successfully identified government healthcare as a potential growth opportunity that has thus far led to the award of five contracts to us by CMS. Together with our flexible technology platform, we have the ability to adapt our business strategy, to allocate resources and to respond to changes in our regulatory environment to capitalize on new growth opportunities. |
• | Proven and experienced management team. Our management team has significant industry experience and has demonstrated strong execution capabilities. Our senior management team, led by Lisa Im, has been with us for an average of approximately 19 years. This team has successfully grown our revenue base and service offerings beyond the original student loan market into healthcare and delinquent state and federal tax and private financial institutions receivables. Our management team’s industry experience, combined with deep and specialized understanding of complex and highly regulated industries, has enabled us to maintain long-standing client relationships and strong financial results. |
Our Growth Strategy
Key elements of our growth strategy include the following:
• | Expand our audit and recovery services in the healthcare market. According to CMS NHE Projections, Medicare spending totaled approximately $750.2 billion in 2018 and is expected to grow by 7.6% per year on average between 2020 and 2027. In the private healthcare market, spending totaled $1.2 trillion in 2018 and expenditures are projected to grow by 5.1% per year on average between 2020 and 2027. As these large markets continue to grow, we expect the need for audit and recovery services to increase in the public and private healthcare markets. In October 2016, we were awarded new RAC contracts for Region 1 which consists of 11 states in the Northeast and Midwest, and Region 5, which covers claims for durable medical equipment, prosthetics and orthotics and home health and hospice payment claims across the U.S. In October 2017, we were awarded the national exclusive MSP CRC contract by CMS. We have also entered into numerous private insurance payer contracts and are pursuing additional opportunities to provide audit, recovery and analytics services in the private healthcare market. In addition, we intend to pursue opportunities to find and eliminate losses prior to payment for healthcare services, including the detection of fraud, waste and abuse in the public and private healthcare markets. |
5
• | Maintain our position in the student loan market. We have long-standing relationships with some of the largest participants in the government-supported student loan market. Although the Department of Education announced in January 2018 that we were selected as one of two recovery contractors under its award for new student loan recovery contracts, we were notified on May 3, 2018 that the Department of Education decided to cancel the current procurement in its entirety, and as a result terminated our contract award. However, we continue to have business relationships with 14 GAs either as clients or through our contracts with ECMC and Navient. |
• | Expand outsource services, and recovery services in other markets. We intend to expand our outsource services, and recovery services in other markets, including the private healthcare recovery market, state and federal tax and federal treasury receivables. We intend to capitalize on our extensive experience and domain expertise and our highly flexible technology platform to seek opportunities in these additional markets. |
• | Pursue strategic alliances and acquisitions. We intend to selectively consider opportunities to grow through strategic alliances or acquisitions that are complementary to our business. These opportunities may enhance our existing capabilities, enable us to enter new markets, expand our product offerings and allow us to diversify our revenues. |
Our Platform
Our data management, analytics, and technology-enabled services platform is proprietary and based on over two decades of experience in auditing and recovering large amounts of funds on behalf of our clients across several markets. The components of our platform include our data management expertise, analytics capabilities and technology-based workflow processes. Our platform integrates these components to allow us to achieve optimized outcomes for our clients in the form of increased efficiency and productivity and high recovery rates. Our platform and workflow processes are also intuitive and easy to use for our recovery and claims specialists and allow us to increase our employee retention and productivity.
The components of our platform include the following:
Data Management Expertise
Our platform manages and stores large amounts of data throughout the workflow process. This includes both proprietary data we have compiled over two decades, as well as third-party data which we can integrate efficiently and in real-time to reduce errors, reduce cycle time processing and, ultimately, improve audit finding and recovery rates. The strength of our data management expertise augments our analytics capabilities and provides our recovery and claims specialists with powerful workflow processes.
Data Analytics Capabilities
Our data analytics capabilities efficiently screen and allocate massive volumes of inventory. For example, in our student loan business, we utilize our proprietary algorithms to assist us in determining the most efficient recovery process and the optimal allocation of recovery specialist resources for each loan. In the healthcare market, we analyze millions of healthcare claims to find potential correlations between claims data and improper payments, which enhance our finding rates. Across all of our current markets, we utilize our proprietary analytics tools to continuously and rigorously test our workflow processes in real-time to drive greater process efficiency and improvement in recovery rates.
Furthermore, we believe our analytics capabilities will extend our potential markets, permitting us to pursue significant new business opportunities. For example, we have expanded the use of our data analytics capabilities in the healthcare sector to offer a variety of services from post- and pre-payment audit of healthcare claims in both the public and private healthcare sector, to detection of fraud, waste and abuse of healthcare claims, to coordination of benefits and pharmacy fraud detection.
Workflow Processes
Over many years, we have developed and refined our workflow processes, which we believe drive higher efficiency and productivity and reduce our reliance on labor-intensive methods relative to more traditional outsourcing models. Our patented technology that supports our proprietary workflows to disaggregate otherwise complex processes into a series of simple, efficient and consistent steps that are easily configurable and applicable to different types of applications. Our workflow processes integrate a broad range of functions that encompass each stage of a workflow process.
6
The following recovery diagram illustrates how the various components of our platform work together to solve a typical recovery client workflow:
7
Our Services
We use our technology-enabled services platform to provide recovery and analytics services in a broad range of markets for the identification and recovery of student loans, improper healthcare payments and delinquent state and federal tax and federal treasury receivables. The table below summarizes our audit and recovery services and related analytics capabilities and the markets we serve.
Healthcare | Recovery | Customer Care / Outsourced Services | Analytics Capabilities | |||
• Provide audit and recovery services to identify improper healthcare payments for public and private healthcare clients • Identify improper payments typically resulting from incorrect coding, procedures that were not medically necessary, incomplete documentation or claims submitted based on outdated fee schedules • Earn contingent, success-based fees based on a percentage of claim amounts recovered | • Provide recovery services to clients in Federal guaranteed student loan program and private institutions • Identify and track defaulted borrowers across our clients’ portfolios of student loans • Utilize our proprietary technology, our history of borrower data and our analytics capabilities to rehabilitate and recover past due student loans • Provide tax recovery services to state and municipal agencies and the IRS • Recover government debt for numerous different federal agencies under a contract with the Treasury • Earn contingent, success-based fees calculated as a percentage of funds that we enable our clients to recover | • Provide default aversion and/or first party call center services • Earn contingent, success-based fees based on the volume of processed transactions, the quantity of labor hours provided based on dedicated headcount, and hosted technology licensing fees | • We use our enhanced data analytics capabilities, which we refer to as Performant Insight, to offer a variety of services from post- and pre-payment audit of healthcare claims to detection of fraud, waste and abuse of healthcare claims, to coordination of benefits and pharmacy fraud detection | |||
Healthcare
We provide audit and recovery services related to improper payments in the healthcare market. In October 2016 we were awarded two new RAC contracts by CMS. One new award covers Parts A and B Medicare payments in a region consisting of 11 states in the Northeast and Midwest. The second award involves post-payment review of DMEPOS and home health and hospice claims across the U.S. In addition, in October 2017 we were awarded the national exclusive MSP CRC contract by CMS. In addition, we have entered into numerous private insurance payer contracts and are pursuing additional opportunities to provide audit, recovery and analytic services in the private healthcare market.
Under our RAC contracts with CMS, we utilize our technology-enabled services platform to screen Medicare claims against several criteria, including coding procedures and medical necessity standards, to determine whether a claim should be further investigated for recoupment or adjustment by CMS. We conduct automated and, where appropriate, detailed medical necessity reviews. If we determine that the likelihood of finding a potential improper payment warrants further investigation, we request and review healthcare provider medical records related to the claim, utilizing experts in Medicare coding and registered nurses. We interact and communicate with healthcare providers and other administrative entities, and ultimately submit the claim to CMS for correction.
Under our MSP contract with CMS, we are responsible for identifying and recovering payments in situations where Medicare should not be the primary payer of healthcare claims because a beneficiary has other forms of insurance coverage, such as through an employer group health plan or certain other payers.
8
In the private healthcare market, we utilize our technology-enabled services platform to provide audit, recovery and analytical services for private healthcare payers. Our experience from our contracts with CMS has helped establish our presence in the private healthcare market by providing us the opportunity to provide audit and recovery services for several national commercial health plans. Our audit and analytics capabilities have allowed us not only to expand our services with these initial private healthcare clients, but also gain entry into other related private healthcare opportunities. Additionally, following our acquisition of Premiere Credit of North America in August of 2018, we now also help hospitals and other medical providers recover payments directly from patients.
Recovery
We provide recovery services primarily to the government-supported student loan industry, and our current clients include several of the largest GAs, as well as private financial institutions. We use our proprietary technology to identify, track and communicate with defaulted borrowers on behalf of our clients to implement suitable recovery programs for the repayment of outstanding student loan balances.
Our clients contract with us to provide recovery services for large pools of student loans generally representing a portion of the total outstanding defaulted balances they manage, which they provide to us as “placements” on a periodic basis. Generally, the volume of placements that we receive from our clients is influenced by our performance under our contracts and our ability to recover funds from defaulted student loans, as measured against the performance of competitors who may service a similar pool of defaulted loans for the same client. To the extent we perform well under our existing contracts and differentiate our services from those of our competitors, we may receive a relatively greater number of student loan placements under these contracts and may improve our ability to obtain future contracts from these clients and other potential clients.
We use algorithms derived from over two decades of experience with defaulted student loans to make reasonably accurate estimates of the recovery outcomes likely to be derived from a placement of defaulted student loans.
We also restructure and recover student loans issued directly by banks to students outside of federal lending programs. These types of loans typically supplement government-supported student loans to meet any shortfall in supply of student loan needs that cannot be met by grants or federal loans. Unlike government-supported student loans, private student loans do not have capped interest rates and, accordingly, involve higher instances of default relative to federally-backed student loans.
We also provide recovery services to several federal, state and municipal tax authorities, the Department of the Treasury and several financial institutions.
In the spring of 2017, the IRS named us as one of four companies to perform recovery services under the private collection program. The new program calls for the use of private companies to recover, on the government’s behalf, outstanding inactive tax receivables. Although the initial placement volumes were low when we commenced work under this contract in April 2017 reflecting the IRS’s objective of a methodical contract start, by the end of 2019, the number of placements of federal tax receivables we received from the IRS more than tripled from what we had processed in 2017.
For state and municipal tax authorities, we analyze a portfolio of delinquent tax and other receivables placed with us, develop a recovery plan and execute a recovery process designed to maximize the recovery of funds. In some instances, we have also run state tax amnesty programs, which provide one-time relief for delinquent tax obligations, and other debtor management services for our clients. We currently have relationships with numerous state and municipal governments. Delinquent obligations are placed with us by our clients and we utilize a process that is similar to the student loan recovery process for recovering these obligations.
For the Department of the Treasury, we recover government debt subrogated to it by numerous different federal agencies. The placements we are provided represent a mix of commercial and individual obligations. We are one of four contractors for the most recent Treasury contract.
We also provide risk management advisory services that enable these clients to proactively manage loan portfolios and reduce the incidence of defaulted loan assets over time. Our experience suggests that proactive default prevention practices produce significant net yield and earnings gains for our clients. We deliver these services in two forms. First, we contact and consult with borrowers to implement a repayment program, including payment through automatic debit arrangements, prior to the beginning of the repayment period in order to increase the likelihood that payments begin on time. Second, we offer a service that involves contacting delinquent borrowers in an effort to cure the delinquency prior to the loan entering default.
9
Customer Care / Outsourced Services
We also derive revenues from default aversion and/or first party call center services for certain clients and the licensing of hosted technology solutions to certain clients. For our hosted technology services, we license our system and integrate our technology into our clients’ operations, for which we are paid a licensing fee. Our revenues for these services include contingency fees, fees based on dedicated headcount to our clients and hosted technology licensing fees.
Analytics Capabilities
For several years, we have leveraged our data analytics tools to help filter, identify audit claims and recover delinquent and defaulted assets and improper payments as part of our core services platform. Through our data analytics capabilities, which we refer to as Performant Insight, we are able to review, aggregate, and synthesize very large volumes of structured and unstructured data, at high speeds, from the initial intake of disparate data sources, to the warehousing of the data, to the analysis and reporting of the data. We believe we have built a differentiated, next-generation “end-to-end” data processing solution that will maximize value for current and future customers.
Performant Insight provides numerous benefits for our audit and recovery services platform. Performant Insight has not only enhanced our existing recovery services under our contracts with CMS and other private healthcare contracts by analyzing significantly higher volumes of healthcare claims at faster rates and reducing our cycle time to review and assess healthcare claims, but has also enabled us to develop improved and more sophisticated business intelligence rules that can be applied to our audit processes. We believe our analytics capabilities will extend our potential markets, permitting us to pursue significant new business opportunities. We have expanded the use of our data analytics capabilities in the healthcare sector to offer a variety of services from post and pre-payment audit of healthcare claims in both the public and private healthcare sector, to detection of fraud, waste and abuse of healthcare claims, to coordination of benefits and pharmacy fraud detection.
Our Clients
We provide our services across a broad range of government and private clients in several markets.
CMS
Our relationship with CMS extends beyond ten years. Under our first RAC contract with CMS, which was awarded in 2009 and expired in 2016, we were responsible for identifying and facilitating the recovery of improper Part A and Part B Medicare payments in the Northeast region of the United States. On January 31, 2018, CMS issued to us their final Letter of Demand which reconciled all outstanding payables to CMS for the old Region A contract. Accordingly, we released an aggregate of approximately $27.8 million and $0.6 million of the estimated liability for appeals and the Net payable to client balances, during the first quarter and third quarter of 2018, respectively. This increased first quarter 2018 revenue by $27.8 million and third quarter revenue by $0.6 million. In conjunction with the release, we also derecognized approximately $9.0 million of prepaid expenses and other current assets, with a charge to other operating expenses, reflecting accrued receivables associated with amounts due to us from our subcontractors for decided and yet-to-be decided appeals.
In October 2016, we were awarded two new RAC contracts with CMS. We received the contract to audit improper payments for claims made under Medicare Parts A and B in Region 1, which consists of Connecticut, Michigan, Indiana, Maine, Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, Ohio, Kentucky, Rhode Island and Vermont, and the contract for Region 5, which involves post-payment review of claims related to DMEPOS and home health and hospice across the U.S. The fees that we receive for identifying improper payments from CMS under these contracts are entirely contingency-based, and the contingency-fee percentage depends on the methods of recovery, and, in some cases, the type of improper payment that we identify.
In October 2017, we were awarded the national exclusive MSP CRC contract by CMS. Under this MSP CRC contract, we are responsible for identifying and recovering payments in situations where Medicare should not be the primary payer of healthcare claims because a beneficiary has other forms of insurance coverage, such as through an employer group health plan or certain other payers. In February 2018, we commenced operations on the MSP CRC contract.
10
Private Healthcare
In the private healthcare market, we utilize our technology-enabled services platform to provide audit, recovery and analytical services for private healthcare payers. Our experience from our contracts with CMS has helped establish our presence in the private healthcare market by providing us the opportunity to provide audit and recovery services for several national commercial health plans. Our audit and analytics capabilities have allowed us not only to expand our services with these initial private healthcare clients, but also gain entry into other related private healthcare opportunities.
Guaranty Agencies
We restructure and recover defaulted student loans issued by private lenders and backed by GAs under the FFELP. As a result of the transition from FFELP to FDSLP that commenced in 2010, the volume of defaulted student loans managed by the GAs has begun to decline over the last few years and is expected to continue to decline. When a borrower stops making regular payments on a FFELP loan, the GA is obligated to reimburse the lender approximately 97% of the loan’s principal and accrued interest. GAs then seek to recover and restructure these obligations. The GAs with which we contract generally structure one to three-year initial term contracts with multiple renewal periods.
We have relationships with 14 GAs in the U.S. either as clients or through our contracts with ECMC and Navient; these relationships average more than eight years in length.
State Tax Agencies
We provide recovery services for individuals’ delinquent state tax obligations on a hosted model. We currently have relationships with a number of state governments.
Private Lenders
We provide recovery services for private student loans, which supplement federally guaranteed loans, and home mortgages to private lenders. Additionally, with the burgeoning personal loan industry we believe there is more opportunity for us to expand services into this private sector.
Internal Revenue Service
In the Spring of 2017, the IRS awarded us a contract to perform recovery services under the PDC program. The new program enables us to collect outstanding inactive tax receivables on the government's behalf. Our ability to recover these receivables will be limited to accounts where taxpayers owe money, but the IRS is no longer actively working their accounts. Although the initial placement volumes were low when we commenced work under this contract in April 2017 reflecting the IRS’s objective of a methodical contract start, by the end of 2019, the number of placements of federal tax receivables we received from the IRS more than tripled from what we had processed in 2017.
U.S. Department of the Treasury
We have assisted the Department of the Treasury for over 20 years in the recovery of delinquent receivables owed to a number of different federal agencies. The debt obligations we help to recover on behalf of the Department of the Treasury include commercial and individual debt obligations. We are one of the six firms servicing the current Department of the Treasury contract. Similar to our other recovery contracts, our fees under this contract are contingency-based. We view this as an important strategic relationship, as it provides us valuable insight into other business opportunities within the federal government.
Sales and Marketing
Our new business opportunities have historically been driven largely by referrals and natural extensions of our existing client relationships, as well as a targeted outreach by our sales team and senior management. Our sales cycles are often lengthy, and demand high levels of attention from our senior management. At any point in time, we are typically focused on a limited number of potentially significant new business opportunities. As a result, to date, we have operated with a small staff of experienced individuals with responsibility for developing new sales, relying heavily upon our executive staff, including an appropriate sales and marketing team covering various markets.
11
Technology Operations
Our technology center is based in Livermore, California, with a redundant capacity in our Grants Pass, Oregon office. Additionally, Performant Insight, our data analytics business, is supported by staff in Sunrise, Florida. We have designed our infrastructure for scalability and redundancy, which allows us to continue to operate in the event of an outage at either datacenter. We maintain an information systems environment with advanced network security intrusion detection and prevention with 24x7 monitoring and security incident response capabilities. We utilize encryption technologies to protect sensitive data on our systems, all data during transmission and all data on redundancy or backup media. We also maintain a comprehensive enterprise wide information security program based on industry standards such as NIST 800-53 and PCI/DSS.
Competition
We face significant competition in all aspects of our business.
In the audit and recovery of improper healthcare payments, we face competition in the bidding process for commercial healthcare contracts, and the RAC and other contracts awarded by CMS. However, based on our structured, highly professional and effective recovery process within the healthcare market, we believe these are contracts for which we are uniquely qualified. This qualification allows us to compete more effectively for contracts such as the MSP CRC contract, which we were awarded in October 2017. In the most recent RAC bidding process, the identified competitive factors were demonstrated experience in effective recovery services in the healthcare market, sufficient capacity to address claims volumes, maintenance of high standards of recovery practices, financial capability to perform under the RAC contract and recovery fee rates. In the commercial healthcare space, those same factors are generally applicable. Our competition in the private healthcare market includes the other RAC service providers, Health Management Systems, Inc. and Cotiviti, LLC, and a variety of healthcare consulting and healthcare information services companies. Many of these companies have greater financial, technological and other resources than we do.
In recovery services for delinquent and defaulted assets, we face competition from a number of companies. Holders of these delinquent and defaulted assets typically engage several firms simultaneously to provide recovery services on different portions of their portfolios. The number of recovery firms engaged varies by client. Initially, we compete to be one of the retained firms in a competitive bidding process and, if we are successful, we then face continuing competition from the client’s other retained firms based on the client’s benchmarking of the recovery performance of its several vendors. Some clients will allocate additional placements to those recovery vendors producing the highest recovery rates. We believe that we primarily compete on the basis of recovery rate performance, as well as maintenance of high standards of recovery practices and data security capabilities. We believe that we compete favorably with respect to these factors as evidenced by our long-standing relationships with our clients in these markets. Pricing is not usually a major competitive factor as all recovery services vendors in these markets typically receive the same contingency-based fee rate.
Government Regulation
The nature of our business requires that we adhere to a complex array of federal and state laws and regulations. These include the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act, or HIPAA, the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act, or FDCPA, the Fair Credit Reporting Act, or FCRA, the rules and regulations established by the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB, and related state laws. We are also governed by a variety of state laws that regulate the collection, use, disclosure and protection of personal information. We have implemented and maintain physical, technical and administrative safeguards intended to protect all personal data and we have processes in place to assist us in complying with applicable laws and regulations regarding the protection of this data. Our compliance efforts include training of personnel and monitoring our systems and personnel.
HIPAA and Related State Laws
Our Medicare recovery business subjects us to compliance with HIPAA and various related state laws that contain substantial restrictions and requirements with respect to the use and disclosure of an individual’s protected health information. HIPAA prohibits us from using or disclosing an individual’s protected health information unless the use or disclosure is authorized by the individual or is specifically required or permitted under HIPAA. Under HIPAA, we must establish administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect the confidentiality, integrity and availability of electronic protected health information maintained or transmitted by us or by others on our behalf. We are required to notify affected individuals and government authorities of data security breaches involving unsecured protected health information. The Department of Health and Human Services Office of Civil Rights enforces HIPAA privacy violations; CMS enforces HIPAA security violations and the Department of Justice enforces criminal violations of HIPAA. We are subject to statutory penalties for violations of HIPAA.
12
Most states have enacted patient confidentiality laws that protect against the unauthorized disclosure of confidential medical information, and many states have adopted or are considering further legislation in this area, including privacy safeguards, security standards and data security breach notification requirements. These state laws, if more stringent than HIPAA requirements, are not preempted by the federal requirements, and we must comply with them even though they may be subject to different interpretations by various courts and other governmental authorities. In addition, numerous other state laws govern the collection, dissemination, use, access to and confidentiality of individually identifiable health and healthcare provider information.
Our compliance efforts include the encryption of protected health information that we hold and the development of procedures to detect, investigate and provide appropriate notification if protected health information is compromised. Our employees and contractors receive initial and periodic supplemental training and are tested to ensure compliance. As part of our certification and accreditation process, we must undergo audits by federal agencies as noted below. CMS regularly audits us for, among other items, compliance with their security standards.
Privacy Act of 1974
The Privacy Act of 1974 governs the collection, use, storage, destruction and disclosure of personal information about individuals by a government agency and extends to government contractors who have access to agency records performing services for government agencies. The Privacy Act requires maintenance of a code of conduct for employees with access to the agency records addressing the obligations under the Privacy Act, training of employees and discipline procedures for noncompliance. The Privacy Act also requires adopting and maintaining appropriate administrative, technical and physical safeguards to ensure the security and confidentiality of records and to protect against any anticipated threats or hazards to their security or integrity.
As a contractor to federal government agencies we are required to comply with the Privacy Act of 1974. Our compliance effort includes initial and ongoing training of employees and contractors in their obligations under the Privacy Act. In addition, we have implemented and maintain physical, technical and administrative safeguards and processes intended to protect all personal data consistent with or exceeding our obligations under the Privacy Act.
Certification, Accreditation and Security
Business services that collect, store, transmit or process information for United States government agencies and organizations are required to undergo a rigorous certification and accreditation process to ensure that they operate at an acceptable level of security risk. As a government contractor, we currently have Authority to Operate, or ATO, licenses from both the Department of Education and CMS.
We maintain a comprehensive enterprise-wide information security program based on industry standards such as NIST 800-53 and PCI/DSS. In addition, we hold SSAE – SOC 1 Type II certification, which provides assurance to auditors of third parties that we maintain the necessary controls and procedures to effectively manage third party data. We undergo an independent audit by our government agency clients on the award of the contract and periodically thereafter. We also conduct periodic self-assessments.
Our regulatory compliance group is charged with the responsibility of ensuring our regulatory compliance and security. All our facilities have security perimeter controls with segregated access by security clearance level. The information systems environment maintains advanced network security intrusion detection and prevention with 24x7 monitoring and security incident response capabilities. We utilize encryption technologies to protect sensitive data on our systems, all data during transmission and all data on redundancy or backup media. Employees undergo background and security checks appropriate to their position. This can include security clearances by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. We also maintain compliant disaster recovery and business continuity plans, annually conduct two tabletop disaster exercises, conduct routine security risk assessments and maintain a continuous improvement process as part of our security risk mitigation and management activity.
13
FDCPA and Related State Laws
The FDCPA regulates persons who regularly collect or attempt to collect, directly or indirectly, consumer debts owed or asserted to be owed to another person. Certain of our debt recovery and loan restructuring activities may be subject to the FDCPA. The FDCPA establishes specific guidelines and procedures that debt recovery firms must follow in communicating with consumer debtors, including the time, place and manner of such communications. Further, it prohibits harassment or abuse by debt recovery firms, including the threat of violence or criminal prosecution, obscene language or repeated telephone calls made with the intent to abuse or harass. The FDCPA also places restrictions on communications with individuals other than consumer debtors in connection with the collection of any consumer debt and sets forth specific procedures to be followed when communicating with such third parties for purposes of obtaining location information about the consumer. In addition, the FDCPA contains various notice and disclosure requirements and prohibits unfair or misleading representations by debt recovery firms. Finally, the FDCPA imposes certain limitations on lawsuits to collect debts against consumers.
Prior to the adoption of amendments to the FDCPA as part of the Dodd-Frank Act, no federal agency had the authority to issue interpretative regulations for the FDCPA. As a result, judicial determinations and non-binding interpretative positions issued by the Federal Trade Commission under the FDCPA created compliance difficulties for the consumer debt collections industry. With the adoption of the amendments to the FDCPA as part of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2011, however, as well as specific statutory authority to issue implementing regulations for the FDCPA, primary jurisdiction for the FDCPA was transferred to the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, or CFPB. Subsequently, the CFPB has indicated that it may issue proposed regulations under the FDCPA.
Debt recovery activities are also regulated at the state level. Most states have laws regulating debt recovery activities in ways that are similar to, and in some cases more stringent than, the FDCPA. In addition, some states require debt recovery firms to be licensed.
Our compliance efforts include written procedures for compliance with the FDCPA and related state laws, employee training and monitoring, auditing client calls, periodic review, testing and retraining of employees, and procedures for responding to client complaints. In all states where we operate, we believe that we currently hold all required state licenses or are exempt from licensing. Violations of the FDCPA may be enforced by the U.S. Federal Trade Commission, or FTC, or by a private action by an individual or class. Violations of the FDCPA are deemed to be an unfair or deceptive act under the Federal Trade Commission Act, which can be punished by fines for each violation. Class action damages can total up to one percent of the net worth of the entity violating the statute. Attorney fees and costs are also recoverable. In the ordinary course of business, we are sued for alleged violations of the FDCPA and comparable state laws, although the amounts involved in the disposition or settlement of any such claims have not been significant.
TCPA
The Telephone Consumer Protection Act, or TCPA, regulates the initiation of calls (which includes text messages) to residential or cellular telephones, including the use of automatic telephone dialing systems as well as artificial or prerecorded voices. The TCPA requires callers to obtain prior express consent or, in some cases, prior express written consent from individuals before placing restricted calls. Our compliance efforts include confirming a consumer has provided prior express consent consistent with the requirements of the law. Violations of the TCPA may be enforced by the U.S. Federal Communications Commission, or FCC, or by a private action by an individual or class. Violations of the TCPA can be punished by recovery of damages or penalties up to $1,500 per violation for willful violations. Attorney fees and costs are also recoverable. In the ordinary course of business, we are sued for alleged violations of the TCPA and comparable state laws, although the amounts involved in the disposition or settlement of any such claims have not been significant.
FCRA
We are also subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act, or FCRA, which regulates consumer credit reporting and which may impose liability on us to the extent that the adverse credit information reported on a consumer to a credit bureau is false or inaccurate. State law, to the extent it is not preempted by the FCRA, may also impose restrictions or liability on us with respect to reporting adverse credit information. Our compliance efforts include initial and ongoing training of employees working with consumer credit reports and the monitoring of usage. Violations of FCRA, which are deemed to be unfair or deceptive acts under the Federal Trade Commission Act, are enforced by the FTC or by a private action by an individual or class. Civil actions by consumers may seek damages per violation, with punitive damages, attorney's fees and costs also recoverable. Under the Federal Trade Commission Act, penalties for engaging in unfair or deceptive acts can be punished by fines for each violation.
14
CFPB
The CFPB was created as part of the Dodd-Frank Act in 2011, with primary implementing and interpretative authority for many federal consumer protection laws, for example the FDCPA, transferred to the CFPB. Among other things, the CFPB was given the authority to issue interpretive regulations for the FDCPA.
In addition to its authority in regard to federal consumer protection laws, the CFPB was also provided direct jurisdiction over certain consumer financial service providers. In October of 2012, the CFPB issued a rule asserting direct jurisdiction over large consumer debt collectors, which includes debt collectors with annual assets of more than $10 million. In accordance with the calculations included in this rule, we are subject to direct jurisdiction of the CFPB and in the future may be directly examined and supervised by the CFPB. In that regard, the CFPB has also released examination guidance that its examiners will use when reviewing compliance by debt collectors subject to its direct supervision.
The CFPB focuses on service providers involved in collecting debt related to any consumer financial product from committing unfair, deceptive, or abusive acts or practices, or UDAAPs, in violation of the Dodd-Frank Act. UDAAPs include actions that are unfair and likely to cause substantial injury to consumers, deceptive actions that mislead or likely to mislead a consumer and abusive acts that interfere with the ability of a consumer to understand a term or condition of a consumer financial product or takes unreasonable advantage of a consumer’s lack of understanding of a consumer financial product. Although abusive acts or practices may also be unfair or deceptive, each of these prohibitions are separate and distinct, and are governed by separate legal standards. Original creditors and other covered persons and service providers involved in collecting debt related to any consumer financial product or service are subject to the prohibition against UDAAPs. The CFPB has indicated that it will continue to review closely the practices of those engaged in the collection of consumer debts for potential UDAAPs in violation of the Dodd-Frank Act.
State Law Compliance and Security Breach Response
Many states impose an obligation on any entity that holds personally identifiable information or health information to adopt appropriate security to protect such data against unauthorized access, misuse, destruction, or modification. All fifty states and the District of Columbia have enacted laws requiring holders of personal information to take certain actions in response to data breach incidents, such as providing prompt notification of the breach to affected individuals and government authorities, and in some cases offering credit monitoring services. In many cases, these laws are limited to electronic data, but states are increasingly enacting or considering stricter and broader requirements. Massachusetts and New York have enacted regulations and statutes that requires any entity that holds, transmits or collects certain personal information about their residents to adopt a written data security plan meeting the requirements set forth in the statute. We have implemented and maintained physical, technical and administrative safeguards intended to protect all personal data and have processes in place to assist us in complying with applicable laws and regulations regarding the protection of this data and properly responding to any security incidents. We have adopted a system security plan and security breach incident response plans to address our compliance with these laws.
On January 1, 2020, the California Consumer Privacy Act of 2018 (the “CCPA”), came into effect. The CCPA provides new rights to California residents and requires that covered companies that collect information about California residents make new disclosures to consumers about their data collection, use and sharing practices, honor requests from consumers to opt out of certain data sharing with third parties and to delete information upon request with certain exceptions. It provides for enforcement by the California Attorney General beginning July 1, 2020 and provides a new private right of action for data breaches. Proposed regulations have been published but are not yet final. The burdens imposed by the CCPA and other similar laws that may be enacted at the federal and state level may require us to modify our data processing practices and policies and to incur substantial expenditure in order to comply.
Intellectual Property
Our intellectual property is a significant component of our business, including, most notably, the intellectual property underlying our proprietary technology-enabled services platform through which we provide our defaulted asset recovery and other services. To protect our intellectual property, we rely on a combination of intellectual property rights, including patents, trade secrets, trademarks and copyrights. We also utilize customary confidentiality and other contractual protections, including employee and third-party confidentiality and invention assignment agreements.
15
As of December 31, 2019, we had two U.S. patents, both covering aspects of the workflow management systems and methods incorporated into our technology-enabled services platform. These patents will expire in September 2024. We routinely assess appropriate occasions for seeking additional patent protection for those aspects of our platform and other technologies that we believe may provide competitive advantages to our business. We also rely on certain unpatented proprietary expertise and other know-how, licensed and acquired third-party technologies, and continuous improvements and other developments of our various technologies, all intended to maintain our leadership position in the industry.
As of December 31, 2019, we had six trademarks registered with the U.S. Patent and Trademark office: DCS, Performant Recovery, Performant Technologies, Discovery Analytics, Performant Insight, and Premiere Credit.
We have registered copyrights covering various copyrighted material relevant to our business. We also have unregistered copyrights in many components of our software systems. We may not be able to use these unregistered copyrights to prevent misappropriation of such content by unauthorized parties in the future; however, we rely on our extensive information technology security measures and contractual arrangements with employees and third-party contractors to minimize the opportunities for any such misuse of this content.
We are not subject to any material intellectual property claims alleging that we infringe, misappropriate or otherwise violate the intellectual property rights of any third party, nor have we asserted any material intellectual property infringement claim against any third party.
Employees
As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately 1,615 full-time employees. None of our employees is a member of a labor union and we consider our employee relations to be good.
Available Information
The SEC maintains an Internet site at http://www.sec.gov that contains our Annual Report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q, current reports on Form 8-K and amendments to those reports, if any, or other filings filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, or the Exchange Act, proxy and information statements.
16
ITEM 1A. Risk Factors
Our business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity are subject to various risks and uncertainties, including those described below, and as a result, the trading price of our common stock could decline.
Risks Related to Our Business
The novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic is having a material adverse impact on our business, results of operations and financial condition, as well as on the operations and financial performance of many of our customers. We are unable to predict the extent to which the COVID-19 pandemic and related impacts will continue to adversely impact our business, results of operations and financial condition.
Our business and the businesses of our customers have been materially and adversely affected by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic that has caused, and is expected to continue to cause, the global slowdown in economic activity. Because the severity, magnitude and duration of the COVID-19 pandemic and its economic consequences are uncertain, rapidly changing and difficult to predict, the COVID-19 pandemic’s impact on our operations and financial performance, as well as its impact on our ability to successfully execute our business strategies and initiatives, remains uncertain and difficult to predict. Further, the ultimate impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our operations and financial performance depends on many factors that are not within our control, including, but not limited, to: governmental and business actions that have been and continue to be taken in response to the pandemic; the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and actions taken in response on global and regional economies and economic activity; the availability of federal, state or local funding programs; general economic uncertainty and financial market volatility; global economic conditions and levels of economic growth; and the pace of recovery when the COVID-19 pandemic subsides.
Given the economic hardships that may be faced by a large portion of the population as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, certain of our customers have chosen to delay the recovery and audit services that we provide, and additional customers may choose to similarly delay the audit and recovery services that we provide, either of which could have a material negative impact on our revenues and results of operations. For example, pursuant to the terms of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) enacted in March 2020, the U.S. federal government suspended payments, ceased accruing interest, and stopped involuntary collections of payments (e.g., wage garnishments) for student loans owned by the Department of Education through September 30, 2020.
Further, a prolonged period of generating lower cash flows from operations as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our financial condition and the achievement of our strategic objectives. Conditions in the financial and credit markets may also limit the availability of funding or increase the cost of funding, which could adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations. While we believe our financial projections are attainable, there can be no assurances that our financial results will be recognized in a timeframe necessary to meet our ongoing cash requirements.
In addition, a large portion of our employees continue to be subject to voluntary or mandated shelter-in-place or other quarantine orders, and the employees of our customers may also be subject to similar stay-at-home orders, either of which may result in the complete or partial closure of one or more of our recovery call centers or other disruptions in our ongoing business operations, which would harm our business and results of operations. If the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic continues for an extended period, it will continue to materially adversely impact our revenues and financial condition.
17
We may not have sufficient cash flows from operations or availability of funds under our lending arrangements to fund our ongoing operations and our other liquidity needs, which could adversely affect our business and financial condition.
Our ability to fund our business plans, capital expenditures and to fund our other liquidity needs depends on our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors beyond our control and the availability of borrowings under our existing lending facility. Following our $5 million Additional Term Loan draw on September 25, 2019, we no longer have any remaining borrowing capacity under our existing Credit Agreement. As a result of no further borrowing capacity under our Credit Agreement, we cannot make assurances that we will maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to fund our ongoing and planned business operations and to fund our other liquidity needs. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has led certain of our customers to delay the recovery and audit services that we provide as a result of the economic hardships that may be faced by a large portion of the population, which may have a material negative impact on our cash flow from operations. If we are required to obtain additional borrowings to fund our ongoing or future business operations, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such additional borrowings or upon terms that are acceptable to us. While we believe our financial projections are attainable, there can be no assurances that our financial results will be recognized in a timeframe necessary to meet our ongoing cash requirements. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our planned business operations or to fund our other liquidity needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, alter our business plans, curtail the services we provide to our current or future clients, sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness, any of which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
Our indebtedness could adversely affect our business and financial condition and reduce the funds available to us for other purposes, and our failure to comply with the covenants contained in our Credit Agreement could result in an event of default that could adversely affect our results of operations.
Our ability to make scheduled payments under our Credit Agreement and to fund our other liquidity needs depends on our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors beyond our control, such as the recent global economic downturn as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic. We cannot make assurances that we will maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to pay the principal and interest on our indebtedness and to fund our other liquidity needs. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our debt service obligations and allow us to maintain compliance with the covenants under our Credit Agreement or to fund our other liquidity needs, we may be forced to reduce or delay capital expenditures, alter our business plans, curtail the services we provide to our current or future clients, sell assets or operations, seek additional capital or restructure or refinance our indebtedness. We cannot ensure that we would be able to take any of these actions, that these actions would be successful and permit us to meet our scheduled debt service obligations or that these actions would be permitted under the terms of our existing or future debt agreements, including our Credit Agreement with ECMC. If we cannot make scheduled payments on our debt, we will be in default and, as a result, our debt holders could declare all outstanding principal and interest to be due and payable, and foreclose against the assets securing our borrowings and we could be forced into bankruptcy or liquidation.
Our Credit Agreement contains, and any agreements to refinance our debt likely will contain, certain financial and restrictive covenants that limit our ability to incur additional debt, including to finance future operations or other capital needs, and to engage in other activities that we may believe are in our long-term best interests, including to dispose of or acquire assets. Our failure to comply with these covenants may result in an event of default, which, if not cured or waived, could accelerate the maturity of our indebtedness or result in modifications to our credit terms. If our indebtedness is accelerated, we may not have sufficient cash resources to satisfy our debt obligations and we may not be able to continue our operations as planned.
18
Downturns in domestic or global economic conditions and other macroeconomic factors could harm our business and results of operations.
Various macroeconomic factors influence our business and results of operations. These include the volume of student loan originations in the United States, together with tuition costs and student enrollment rates, the default rate of student loan borrowers, which is impacted by domestic and global economic conditions, rates of unemployment and similar factors, and the growth in Medicare expenditures or claims made to private healthcare providers resulting from changes in healthcare costs or the healthcare industry taken as a whole. Changes in the overall economy could lead to a reduction in overall recovery rates by our clients, which in turn could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations. For example, our business and the businesses of our customers have been materially and adversely affected by the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic that has caused, and is expected to continue to cause, the global slowdown in economic activity, which has resulted in a significant negative impact on our financial condition and results of operations.
We typically face a long period to start up a new contract which may cause us to incur expenses before we receive revenues from new client relationships.
If we are successful in obtaining an engagement with a new client or a new contract with an existing client, we typically have a subsequent long implementation period in which the services are planned in detail and we integrate our technology, processes and resources with the client’s operations. If we enter into a contract with a new client, we typically will not receive revenues until implementation is completed and work under the contract actually begins, which can be a substantial period of time. Our clients may also experience delays in obtaining approvals or managing protests from unsuccessful bidders, such as the lengthy protests regarding the most recent contract procurement from the Department of Education, or delays associated with technology or system implementations, such as the delays experienced with the implementation of our first RAC contract with CMS. Because we generally begin to hire new employees to provide services to a new client once a contract is signed and otherwise incur significant upfront implantation expenses, we incur significant expenses associated with new contracts before we receive corresponding revenues under any such new contract. If we are not able to pay the upfront expenses for commencing new contracts out of cash from operations or availability of borrowings under our lending arrangements, we may be required to scale back our operations or alter our business plans to account for cash shortages, either of which could prevent us from earning future revenues under any such new client or contract engagements. Further, if we are not successful in maintaining contractual commitments after the expenses we incur during our typically long implementation cycle, our cash flows and results of operations could be adversely affected.
Revenues generated from our three largest clients represented 45% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, and 61% of our revenues for the year ended 2018. Any termination of or deterioration in our relationship with any of these or our other significant clients would result in a further decline in our revenues.
We have derived a substantial portion of our revenues from a limited number of clients. Revenues from our three largest clients represented 45% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, and 61% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018. All of our contracts with our significant clients are subject to periodic renewal and re-bidding processes and if we lose one of these clients or if the terms of our relationships with any of these clients become less favorable to us, our revenues would decline, which would harm our business, financial condition and results of operations.
19
Many of our contracts with our clients for the recovery of student loans and other receivables are not exclusive and do not commit our clients to provide specified volumes of business. In addition, the terms of these contracts may be changed unilaterally and on short notice by our clients. As a consequence, there is no assurance that we will be able to maintain our revenues and operating results.
Substantially all of our existing contracts for the recovery of delinquent receivables (including student loans, state taxes, federal taxes and Treasury-related receivables), which represented approximately 71% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, and 64% of our revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018, enable our clients to terminate their contractual relationship with us at any time without penalty, potentially leading to loss of business or renegotiation of terms. Further, most of our contracts in these markets allow our clients to unilaterally change the volume of loans and other receivables that are placed with us or the payment terms at any given time. In addition, most of our contracts are not exclusive, with our clients retaining multiple service providers with whom we must compete for placements of loans or other obligations. Therefore, despite our contractual relationships with our clients, our contracts do not provide assurance that we will generate a minimum amount of revenues or that we will receive a specific volume of placements. Our revenues and operating results would be negatively affected if our student loan and receivables clients reduce the volume of student loan placements provided to us, modify the terms of service, including the success fees we are able to earn upon recovery of defaulted student loans, or any of these clients establish more favorable relationships with our competitors.
We may not be able to manage our potential growth effectively and our results of operations could be negatively affected.
Our RAC contracts, MSP CRC contract, and other commercial healthcare contracts provide the opportunity to restore growth in our business. However, our focus on growth and the expansion of our business may place additional demands on our management, operations and financial resources and will require us to incur additional expenses. We cannot be sure that we will be able to manage our performance under any significant new contracts effectively. In order to successfully perform under any significant new contracts, our expenses will increase to recruit, train and manage additional qualified employees and subcontractors and to expand and enhance our administrative infrastructure and continue to improve our management, financial and information systems and controls. If we cannot manage our growth effectively, our expenses may increase, and our results of operations could be negatively affected.
We face significant competition in connection with obtaining, retaining and performing under our client contracts, and an inability to compete effectively in the future could harm our relationships with our clients, which would impact our ability to maintain our revenues and operating results.
We operate in very competitive markets. In providing our services to the student loan and healthcare markets, we face competition from many other companies. Initially, we compete with these companies to be one of typically several firms engaged to provide recovery and audit services to a particular client and, if we are successful in being engaged, we then face continuing competition from the client’s other retained firms based on the client’s benchmarking of the recovery rates of its several vendors. In addition, those recovery and audit vendors who produce the highest recovery or audit rates from a client often will be allocated additional placements and, in some cases, additional success fees. Accordingly, maintaining high levels of recovery and audit performance, and doing so in a cost-effective manner, are important factors in our ability to maintain and grow our revenues and net income and the failure to achieve these objectives could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Some of our current and potential competitors in the markets in which we operate may have greater financial, marketing, technological or other resources than we do. The ability of any of our competitors and potential competitors to adopt new and effective technology to better serve our markets may allow them to gain market strength. Increasing levels of competition in the future may result in lower recovery or audit fees, lower volumes of contracted recovery or audit services or higher costs for resources. Any inability to compete effectively in the markets that we serve could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
20
Our ability to derive revenues under our new RAC contracts will depend in part on the number and types of potentially improper claims that we are allowed to pursue by CMS, and our results of operations may be harmed if the scope of claims that we are allowed to pursue and be compensated for is limited.
Under CMS’s Medicare recovery audit program, RAC contractors have not been permitted to seek the recovery of an improper claim unless that particular type of claim has been pre-approved by CMS to ensure compliance with applicable Medicare payment policies, as well as national and local coverage determinations. As work under the first RAC contract progressed, CMS placed increasing restrictions on the scope of audits permitted by RAC contractors and these restrictions have not been relaxed under the newly awarded RAC contracts. Accordingly, the long-term growth of the revenues we derive under our two newly awarded RAC contracts will depend in significant part on the scope of potentially improper claims that we are allowed to pursue. Revenues from our RAC contracts with CMS during the year ended December 31, 2018 were $1.7 million (excluding the effects of the release of the $28.4 million appeal reserve in connection with the termination of our first CMS RAC contract).
In particular, in September 2013, CMS implemented rules that prevent RAC contractors from being able to review and audit (i) whether inpatient care delivered to patients with hospital stays lasting less than two midnights was medically necessary and therefore deserving of the higher reimbursement levels under Medicare Part A or (ii) whether inpatient treatment was medically necessary for admissions spanning more than two midnights. In connection with these restrictions, hospitals cannot bill CMS for outpatient services on hospital stays lasting less than two midnights during such period. Fees associated with recoveries initiated by us based upon improper claims for inpatient reimbursement of these short stays had represented a substantial portion of the revenues we had earned under our prior RAC contract. The continued suspension of this type of review activity has had and may continue to have a material adverse effect on our future healthcare revenues and operating results, depending on a variety of factors including, among other things, CMS’s evaluation of provider compliance with the new rules, the rules ultimately adopted by CMS with respect to medical necessity reviews of Medicare reimbursement claims associated with short stay inpatient admissions and, more generally, the scope of improper claims that CMS allows us to pursue and our ability to successfully identify improper claims within the permitted scope.
The U.S. federal government accounts for a significant portion of our revenues, and any loss of business from, or change in our relationship with, the U.S. federal government would result in a significant decrease in our revenues and operating results.
We have historically derived and are likely to continue to derive a significant portion of our revenues from the U.S. federal government. For 2019 and 2018, revenues under contracts with the U.S. federal government accounted for approximately 36% and 35%, respectively, of our total revenues. The continuation and exercise of renewal options on government contracts and any new government contracts are, among other things, contingent upon the availability of adequate funding for the applicable federal government agency. Changes in federal government spending, or other regulatory changes such as the recent decisions by several governmental agencies to suspend collection efforts in the near term as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, could directly affect our financial performance.
For example, although the Department of Education announced in January 2018 that we were selected as one of two recovery contractors under its award for new student loan recovery contracts, we were notified on May 3, 2018 that the Department of Education has decided to cancel the current procurement in its entirety, and as a result terminated our contract award. Protests have been filed by certain of the unsuccessful bidders of the procurement of the new contracts from the Department of Education, and at this time, we cannot speculate on the outcome of any such protest or when work will begin under our new contract award. The loss of business from the U.S. federal government, or significant policy changes or financial pressures within the agencies of the U.S. federal government that we serve would result in a significant decrease in our revenues, which would adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
21
Future legislative or regulatory changes affecting the markets in which we operate could impair our business and operations.
Two of the principal markets in which we provide our recovery and audit services, government-supported student loans and the Medicare program, are a subject of significant legislative and regulatory focus and we cannot anticipate how future changes in government policy may affect our business and operations. For example, Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, (SAFRA) significantly changed the structure of the government-supported student loan market by assigning responsibility for all new government-supported student loan originations to the Department of Education, rather than originations by private institutions and backed by one of the remaining 24 government-supported GAs. Further. the Department of Education’s decision to cancel the current procurement in its entirety in 2018, terminated our contract award, which has significantly reduced our revenues in the student loan market. Lastly, the continued suspension of the type of review activity we are allowed to conduct under our contracts with CMS has resulted in limitation on our healthcare revenues and operating results. Any future changes in the legislation and regulations that govern these markets, may require us to adapt our business to the new circumstances and we may be unable to do so in a manner that does not adversely affect our business and operations.
The reduction in the number of government-supported student loans originated by our GA clients has resulted in a lower amount of student loans that we are able to rehabilitate, and may result in the consolidation among the GAs, either of which would decrease our revenues.
As a result of SAFRA, which terminated the ability of the GAs to originate government-supported student loans, the overall number of defaulted student loans that we are able to service on behalf of our GA clients has begun to decline. Further, we are seeing a larger amount of defaulted student loans within our GA client portfolios that have previously been rehabilitated, which, according to current regulations, prevents us from rehabilitating any such student loan for a second time. This overall reduction in the number of defaulted student loans in our GA client portfolios, and the larger percentage of defaulted student loans that have been previously rehabilitated, together with the cessation of placements of defaulted student loans from the Department of Education, has resulted in a decrease in revenues from our GA clients, which has negatively impacted our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Further, some have speculated that there may be consolidation among the remaining GAs. This speculation has heightened as a result of the reduction of fees that the GAs will receive for rehabilitating student loans as a result of the Bipartisan Budget Act of 2013. If GAs that are our clients are combined with GAs with whom we do not have a relationship, we could suffer a loss of business. Two of our GA clients were responsible for 22% and 33%, respectively, of revenues for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. The consolidation of our GA clients with others and the failure to provide recovery services to the consolidated entity could decrease our revenues, which could negatively impact our business, financial condition and results of operations.
22
Our results of operations may fluctuate on a quarterly or annual basis and cause volatility in the price of our stock.
Our revenues and operating results could vary significantly from period-to-period and may fail to match our past performance because of a variety of factors, some of which are outside of our control. Any of these factors could cause the price of our common stock to fluctuate. Factors that could contribute to the variability of our operating results include:
• the amount of defaulted student loans and other receivables that our clients place with us for recovery;
• the timing of placements of student loans and other receivables which are entirely in the discretion of our clients;
• the schedules of government agencies for awarding contracts;
• our ability to maintain contractual commitments after the expenses we incur during our typically long implementation cycle for new customer contracts;
• our ability to successfully identify improper Medicare claims and the number and type of potentially improper
claims that CMS authorizes us to pursue under our RAC contact;
• our ability to continue to generate revenues under our private healthcare contracts;
• the loss or gain of significant clients or changes in the contingency fee rates or other significant terms of our
business arrangements with our significant clients;
• technological and operational issues that may affect our clients and regulatory changes in the markets we service;
and
• general industry and macroeconomic conditions.
A failure of our operating systems or technology infrastructure, or those of our third-party vendors and subcontractors, could disrupt the operation of our business.
A failure of our operating systems or technology infrastructure, or those of our third-party vendors and subcontractors, could disrupt our operations. Our operating systems and technology infrastructure are susceptible to damage or interruption from various causes, including acts of God and other natural disasters, power losses, computer systems failures, Internet and telecommunications or data network failures, global health crises, operator error, computer viruses, losses of and corruption of data and similar events. The occurrence of any of these events could result in interruptions, delays or cessations in service to our clients, reduce the attractiveness of our recovery services to current or potential clients and adversely impact our financial condition and results of operations. While we have backup systems in many of our operating facilities, an extended outage of utility or network services may harm our ability to operate our business. Further, the situations we plan for and the amount of insurance coverage we maintain for losses as result of failures of our operating systems and infrastructure may not be adequate in any particular case.
If our security measures are breached or fail and unauthorized access is obtained to our clients’ confidential data, our services may be perceived as insecure, the attractiveness of our recovery services to current or potential clients may be reduced, and we may incur significant liabilities.
Our recovery services involve the storage and transmission of confidential information relating to our clients and their customers, including health, financial, credit, payment and other personal or confidential information. Although our data security procedures are designed to protect against unauthorized access to confidential information, our computer systems, software and networks may be vulnerable to unauthorized access and disclosure of our clients’ confidential information. Further, we may not effectively adapt our security measures to evolving security risks, address the security and privacy concerns of existing or potential clients as they change over time, or be compliant with federal, state, and local laws and regulations with respect to securing confidential information. Unauthorized access to confidential information relating to our clients and their customers could lead to reputational damage which could deter our clients and potential clients from selecting our recovery services, or result in termination of contracts with those clients affected by any such breach, regulatory action, and claims against us.
23
In the event of any unauthorized access to personal or other confidential information, we may be required to expend significant resources to investigate and remediate vulnerabilities in our security procedures, and we may be subject to fines, penalties, litigation costs, and financial losses that are either not insured against or not fully covered through any insurance maintained by us. If one or more of such failures in our security and privacy measures were to occur, our business, financial condition and results of operations could suffer.
Our business may be harmed if we lose members of our management team or other key employees.
We are highly dependent on members of our management team and other key employees and our future success depends in part on our ability to retain these people. Our inability to continue to attract and retain members of our management team and other key employees could adversely affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
The growth of our healthcare business will require us to hire and retain employees with specialized skills and failure to do so could harm our ability to grow our business.
The growth of our healthcare business will depend in part on our ability to recruit, train and manage additional qualified employees. Our healthcare-related operations require us to hire registered nurses and experts in Medicare coding. Finding, attracting and retaining employees with these skills is a critical component of providing our healthcare-related recovery and audit services, and our inability to staff these operations appropriately represents a risk to our healthcare service offering and associated revenues. An inability to hire qualified personnel, particularly to serve our healthcare clients, may restrain the growth of our business.
We rely on subcontractors to provide services to our clients and the failure of subcontractors to perform as expected could harm our business operations and our relationships with our clients.
We engage subcontractors to provide certain services to our clients. These subcontractors participate to varying degrees in our recovery activities with regards to all of the services we provide. While we believe that we perform appropriate due diligence before we hire subcontractors, our subcontractors may not provide adequate service or otherwise comply with the terms set forth in their agreements. In the event a subcontractor provides deficient performance to one or more of our clients, any such client may reduce the volume of services we are providing under an existing contract or may terminate the relevant contract entirely and we may face claims for breach of contract. Any such disruption in our relations with our clients as a result of services provided by any of our subcontractors could adversely affect our revenues and operating results.
If our software vendors or utility and network providers fail to deliver or perform as expected our business operations could be adversely affected.
Our recovery services depend in part on third-party providers, including software vendors and utility and network providers. Our ability to service our clients depends on these third-party providers meeting our expectations and contractual obligations in a timely and effective manner. Our business could be materially and adversely affected, and we might incur significant additional liabilities, if the services provided by these third-party providers do not meet our expectations or if they terminate or refuse to renew their relationships with us on similar contractual terms.
24
We are subject to extensive regulations regarding the use and disclosure of confidential personal information and failure to comply with these regulations could cause us to incur liabilities and expenses.
We are subject to a wide array of federal and state laws and regulations regarding the use and disclosure of confidential personal information and security. For example, the federal Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (HIPAA), as amended, and related state laws subject us to substantial restrictions and requirements with respect to the use and disclosure of the personal health information that we obtain in connection with our contracts with CMS and we must establish administrative, physical and technical safeguards to protect the confidentiality of this information. Similar protections extend to the type of personal financial and other information we acquire from our student loan, state tax and federal receivables clients. We are required to notify affected individuals and government agencies of data security breaches involving protected health and certain personally identifiable information. These laws and regulations also require that we develop, implement and maintain written, comprehensive information security programs containing safeguards that are appropriate to protect personally identifiable information or health information against unauthorized access, misuse, destruction or modification. Federal law generally does not preempt state law in the area of protection of personal information, and as a result we must also comply with state laws and regulations. Regulation of privacy, data use and security require that we incur significant expenses, which could increase in the future as a result of additional regulations, all of which adversely affects our results of operations. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations can result in penalties and in some cases expose us to civil lawsuits.
Our student loan recovery business is subject to extensive regulation and consumer protection laws and our failure to comply with these regulations and laws may subject us to liability and result in significant costs.
Our student loan recovery business is subject to regulation and oversight by various state and federal agencies, particularly in the area of consumer protection. The Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA), and related state laws provide specific guidelines that we must follow in communicating with holders of student loans and regulates the manner in which we can recover defaulted student loans. Some state attorney generals have been active in this area of consumer protection regulation. We are subject, and may be subject in the future, to inquiries and audits from state and federal regulators, as well as frequent litigation from private plaintiffs regarding compliance under the FDCPA and related state regulations. We are also subject to the Fair Credit Reporting Act (FCRA), which regulates consumer credit reporting and may impose liability on us to the extent adverse credit information reported to a credit bureau is false or inaccurate. Our compliance with the FDCPA, FCRA and other federal and state regulations that affect our student loan recovery business may result in significant costs, including litigation costs. We may also become subject to regulations promulgated by the United States Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB), which was established in July 2011 as part of the Dodd-Frank Act to, among other things, establish regulations regarding consumer financial protection laws. In addition, the CFPB has investigatory and enforcement authority with respect to whether persons are engaged in unlawful acts or practices in connection with the collection of consumer debts.
Litigation may result in substantial costs of defense, damages or settlement, any of which could subject us to significant costs and expenses.
We are party to lawsuits in the normal course of business, particularly in connection with our student loan recovery services. For example, we are regularly subject to claims that we have violated the guidelines and procedures that must be followed under federal and state laws in communicating with consumer debtors. We may not ultimately prevail or otherwise be able to satisfactorily resolve any pending or future litigation, which may result in substantial costs of defense, damages or settlement. In the future, we may be required to alter our business practices or pay substantial damages or settlement costs as a result of litigation proceedings, which could adversely affect our business operations and results of operations.
25
If we are unable to adequately protect our proprietary technology, our competitive position could be harmed, or we could be required to incur significant costs to enforce our rights.
The success of our business depends in part upon our proprietary technology platform. We rely on a combination of copyright, patent, trademark, and trade secret laws, as well as on confidentiality procedures and non-compete agreements, to establish and protect our proprietary technology rights. The steps we have taken to deter misappropriation of our proprietary technology may be insufficient to protect our proprietary information. In particular, we may not be able to protect our trade secrets, know-how and other proprietary information adequately. Although we use reasonable efforts to protect this proprietary information and technology, our employees, consultants and other parties may unintentionally or willfully disclose our information or technology to competitors. Enforcing a claim that a third party illegally obtained and is using any of our proprietary information or technology is expensive and time consuming, and the outcome is unpredictable. We rely, in part, on nondisclosure, confidentiality and invention assignment agreements with our employees, consultants and other parties to protect our trade secrets, know-how and other intellectual property and proprietary information. These agreements may not be self-executing, or they may be breached, and we may not have adequate remedies for such breach. Moreover, third parties may independently develop similar or equivalent proprietary information or otherwise gain access to our trade secrets, know-how and other proprietary information. Any infringement, misappropriation or other violation of our patents, trademarks, copyrights, trade secrets, or other intellectual property rights could adversely affect any competitive advantage we currently derive or may derive from our proprietary technology platform and we may incur significant costs associated with litigation that may be necessary to enforce our intellectual property rights.
Claims by others that we infringe their intellectual property could force us to incur significant costs or revise the way we conduct our business.
Our competitors protect their proprietary rights by means of patents, trade secrets, copyrights, trademarks and other intellectual property. Any party asserting that we infringe, misappropriate or violate their intellectual property rights may force us to defend ourselves, and potentially our clients, against the alleged claim. These claims and any resulting lawsuit, if successful, could be time-consuming and expensive to defend, subject us to significant liability for damages or invalidation of our proprietary rights, prevent us from operating all or a portion of our business or force us to redesign our services or technology platform or cause an interruption or cessation of our business operations, any of which could adversely affect our business and operating results. In addition, any litigation relating to the infringement of intellectual property rights could harm our relationships with current and prospective clients. The risk of such claims and lawsuits could increase if we increase the size and scope of our services in our existing markets or expand into new markets.
We may make acquisitions that prove unsuccessful, strain or divert our resources and harm our results of operations and stock price.
We may consider acquisitions of other companies in our industry or in new markets. We may not be able to successfully complete any such acquisition and, if completed, any such acquisition may fail to achieve the intended financial results. We may not be able to successfully integrate any acquired businesses with our own and we may be unable to maintain our standards, controls and policies. Further, acquisitions may place additional constraints on our resources by diverting the attention of our management from other business concerns. Moreover, any acquisition may result in a potentially dilutive issuance of equity securities, the incurrence of additional debt, the amortization expenses related to intangible assets, and the potential impairment charges related to intangible assets or goodwill, all of which could adversely affect our results of operations and stock price.
The price of our common stock could be volatile, and you may not be able to sell your shares at or above the public offering price.
Since our initial public offering in August 2012, the price of our common stock, as reported by NASDAQ Global Select Market, has ranged from a low sales price of $0.79 on December 9, 2019 to a high sales price of $14.09 on March 4, 2013. The trading price of our common stock may be significantly affected by various factors, including: quarterly fluctuations in our operating results; the financial projections we may provide to the public, any changes in those projections or our failure to meet those projections; changes in investors’ and analysts’ perception of the business risks and conditions of our business; our ability to meet the earnings estimates and other performance expectations of financial analysts or investors; unfavorable commentary or downgrades of our stock by equity research analysts; changes in our capital structure, such as future issuances of debt or equity securities; our success or failure to obtain new contract awards; lawsuits threatened or filed against us; strategic actions by us or our competitors, such as acquisitions or restructurings; new legislation or regulatory actions; changes in our relationship with any of our significant clients; fluctuations in the stock prices of our peer companies or in stock markets in general; and general economic conditions.
26
Our significant stockholders have the ability to influence significant corporate activities and our significant stockholders' interests may not coincide with yours.
Parthenon Capital Partners, Invesco Ltd., and Prescott Group Management, L.L.C. beneficially owned approximately 25.0%, 19.0%, and 15.4% of our common stock, respectively, as of December 31, 2019. As a result of their ownership, Parthenon Capital Partners, Invesco Ltd., and Prescott Group Management, L.L.C. have the ability to influence the outcome of matters submitted to a vote of stockholders and, through our board of directors, the ability to influence decision making with respect to our business direction and policies. Parthenon Capital Partners, Invesco Ltd., and Prescott Group Management, L.L.C. may have interests different from our other stockholders’ interests and may vote in a manner adverse to those interests. Matters over which Parthenon Capital Partners, Invesco Ltd., and Prescott Group Management, L.L.C. can, directly or indirectly, exercise influence include:
• mergers and other business combination transactions, including proposed transactions that would result in our
stockholders receiving a premium price for their shares;
• other acquisitions or dispositions of businesses or assets;
• incurrence of indebtedness and the issuance of equity securities;
• repurchase of stock and payment of dividends; and
• the issuance of shares to management under our equity incentive plans.
In addition, Parthenon Capital Partners has a contractual right to designate a number of directors proportionate to its stock ownership. Further, under our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, Parthenon Capital Partners does not have any obligation to present to us, and Parthenon Capital Partners may separately pursue, corporate opportunities of which it becomes aware, even if those opportunities are ones that we would have pursued if granted the opportunity.
Anti-takeover provisions contained in our certificate of incorporation and bylaws could impair a takeover attempt that our stockholders may find beneficial.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws contain provisions that could have the effect of rendering more difficult or discouraging an acquisition deemed undesirable by our board of directors. Our corporate governance documents include the following provisions: establishing a classified board of directors so that not all members of our board are elected at one time; providing that directors may be removed by stockholders only for cause; authorizing blank check preferred stock, which could be issued with voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common stock; limiting the ability of our stockholders to call and bring business before special meetings and to take action by written consent in lieu of a meeting; limiting our ability to engage in certain business combinations with any “interested stockholder,” other than Parthenon Capital Partners, for a three-year period following the time that the stockholder became an interested stockholder; requiring advance notice of stockholder proposals for business to be conducted at meetings of our stockholders and for nominations of candidates for election to our board of directors; requiring a super majority vote for certain amendments to our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws; and limiting the determination of the number of directors on our board of directors and the filling of vacancies or newly created seats on the board, to our board of directors then in office. These provisions, alone or together, could have the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control, could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
ITEM 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None.
27
ITEM 2. Properties
Facilities
As of December 31, 2019, we operated seven separate office locations throughout the United States. The largest of these facilities is in Livermore, California and serves as our corporate headquarters, as well as a data center and production location. Our Livermore facility is comprised of approximately 50,000 square feet of space and has a lease expiration of November 2022. We also lease production centers in California, Oregon, Florida, Tennessee, and Texas and own production/data centers in Oregon and Indiana.
We believe that our facilities are adequate for current operations and that additional space will be available as required. See Note 6 to our consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K for information regarding our lease obligations.
ITEM 3. Legal Proceedings
We are involved in various legal proceedings that arise from our normal business operations. These actions generally derive from our student loan recovery services, and generally assert claims for violations of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act or similar federal and state consumer credit laws. While litigation is inherently unpredictable, we believe that none of these legal proceedings, individually or collectively, will have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or our results of operations.
ITEM 4. Mine Safety Disclosures
Not applicable.
28
PART II
ITEM 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Trading Symbol
Shares of Performant currently trade on the NASDAQ under the trading symbol PFMT.
Stockholders
As of December 31, 2019, we had approximately 20 holders of record of our common stock and we believe a greater number of shareholders who hold shares through brokers, banks or other nominees.
Dividends
Our board of directors does not currently intend to pay regular dividends on our common stock. Our Credit Agreement contains a covenant prohibiting the payment of cash dividends.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Information regarding the securities authorized for issuance under our equity compensation plans can be found under Item 12 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
None.
ITEM 6. Selected Financial Data
The selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the selected consolidated statements of operations data for each year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements which are included elsewhere in this annual report. The selected consolidated balance sheet data as of December 31, 2017, 2016 and 2015, and the selected consolidated statements of operations data for the years ended December 31, 2017, 2016, and 2015 have been derived from our audited consolidated financial statements not included in this annual report. Historical results are not necessarily indicative of future results. You should read the following selected consolidated historical financial data below in conjunction with the section titled “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” and the consolidated financial statements, related notes, and other financial information included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The selected consolidated financial data in this section is not intended to replace the consolidated financial statements and is qualified in its entirety by the consolidated financial statements and related notes and schedule included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
29
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statement of Operations Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 150,432 | $ | 155,668 | $ | 132,049 | $ | 141,360 | $ | 159,381 | |||||||||
Operating expenses: | |||||||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits | 115,194 | 96,144 | 82,191 | 78,863 | 88,077 | ||||||||||||||
Other operating expense | 47,687 | 58,333 | 55,863 | 54,985 | 64,360 | ||||||||||||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets | 7,200 | 2,988 | 1,081 | 15,438 | 236 | ||||||||||||||
Total operating expenses | 170,081 | 157,465 | 139,135 | 149,286 | 152,673 | ||||||||||||||
Income (loss) from operations | (19,649 | ) | (1,797 | ) | (7,086 | ) | (7,926 | ) | 6,708 | ||||||||||
Interest expense | (7,589 | ) | (4,699 | ) | (6,972 | ) | (7,897 | ) | (8,889 | ) | |||||||||
Interest income | 41 | 28 | 4 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Loss before provision for income taxes | (27,197 | ) | (6,468 | ) | (14,054 | ) | (15,823 | ) | (2,181 | ) | |||||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | (377 | ) | 1,542 | (1,325 | ) | (4,370 | ) | (386 | ) | ||||||||||
Net loss available to common shareholders | (26,820 | ) | (8,010 | ) | (12,729 | ) | (11,453 | ) | (1,795 | ) | |||||||||
Net loss per share attributable to common shareholders (1) | |||||||||||||||||||
Basic | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | ||||
Diluted | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | $ | (0.25 | ) | $ | (0.23 | ) | $ | (0.04 | ) | ||||
Weighted average shares (in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Basic | 53,468 | 52,064 | 50,688 | 50,038 | 49,415 | ||||||||||||||
Diluted | 53,468 | 52,064 | 50,688 | 50,038 | 49,415 | ||||||||||||||
(1) | Please see Note 1 to our consolidated financial statements for an explanation of the calculations of our basic and diluted net income per share of common stock. |
As of December 31, | |||||||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |||||||||||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||||||||||||||
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data: | |||||||||||||||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3,373 | $ | 5,462 | $ | 21,731 | $ | 32,982 | $ | 71,182 | |||||||||
Total assets | 138,872 | 137,759 | 164,436 | 185,078 | 244,656 | ||||||||||||||
Total debt | 64,313 | 45,800 | 44,000 | 55,182 | 94,258 | ||||||||||||||
Total liabilities | 85,247 | 60,533 | 84,111 | 98,833 | 150,800 | ||||||||||||||
Total stockholders’ equity | 53,625 | 77,226 | 80,325 | 86,245 | 93,856 | ||||||||||||||
ITEM 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations
30
Overview
We provide technology-enabled audit, recovery, outsource services, and related analytics services in the United States. Our services help identify improper payments, and in some markets, restructure and recover delinquent or defaulted assets and improper payments for both government and private clients in a broad range of markets. Our clients typically operate in complex and regulated environments and outsource their audit and recovery needs in order to reduce losses on billions of dollars of improper healthcare payments, delinquent state and federal tax and federal treasury, defaulted student loans, and other receivables. We also provide complex outsource services for clients across our various markets, where we handle many or all aspects of our clients’ recovery processes.
Our revenue model is generally success-based as we earn fees on the aggregate correct audits and/or amount of funds that we enable our clients to recover. Our services do not require any significant upfront investments by our clients and offer our clients the opportunity to recover significant funds otherwise lost. Because our model is based upon the success of our efforts, our business objectives are aligned with those of our clients and we are generally not reliant on their spending budgets. Furthermore, our business model does not require significant capital as we do not purchase loans or obligations.
COVID-19 Pandemic
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. The COVID-19 pandemic has become widespread in the United States, including the areas in which the Company conducts its business operations. State and local governments in places where our primary offices are located, as well as certain of our clients, have enacted stay-at-home orders as well as restrictions to travel and business activities, all of which has had a significant negative impact on our business as well as global economic conditions.
We took proactive actions early on to protect the health of our employees and their families, including limiting the number of people permitted to be present in any particular meeting, curtailing business travel and encouraging videoconferencing whenever possible. In addition, as the COVID-19 pandemic worsened throughout March and into April 2020, we voluntarily required almost all personnel to work remotely and we restricted access to our sites to personnel who are required to perform critical business continuity activities.
While we currently believe we have taken steps that will allow us to function in a virtual or remote fashion as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic, the extent of the COVID-19 pandemic’s effect on our operational and financial performance will depend on future developments, including the duration, spread and intensity of the pandemic, additional protective measures implemented by governmental authorities or by us to protect our employees, and effects of the pandemic and such protective measures on our clients, all of which are uncertain and difficult to predict considering the rapidly evolving landscape. As a result, it is not currently possible to ascertain or predict the overall long-term impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our business. To date, certain of our customers, including Federal and state governments have chosen to delay the recovery and audit services that we provide, which may have a material negative impact on our revenues and results of operations. For example, pursuant to the terms of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) enacted in March 2020, the U.S. Federal government suspended payments, ceased accruing interest, and stopped involuntary collections of payments (e.g., wage garnishments) for student loans owned by the Department of Education through September 30, 2020. In addition, as a large portion of our employees continue to be subject to shelter-in-place or other quarantine orders, which may result in the complete or partial closure of one or more of our recovery call centers or other disruptions in our ongoing business operations. If the COVID-19 pandemic continues to increase in severity or if overall global or localized economic activity continues to contract for any appreciable length of time, it will continue to have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and cash flows.
There is significant uncertainty around the breadth and duration of business disruptions related to COVID-19 pandemic, as well as its impact on the U.S. economy, the ongoing business operations of our clients or our results of operations and financial condition. While our management team is actively monitoring the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic and may take further actions altering our business operations that we determine are in the best interests of our employees and clients or as required by federal, state, or local authorities, the full impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on our results of operations, financial condition, or liquidity for fiscal year 2020 and beyond cannot be estimated at this point. The following discussions are subject to the future effects of the COVID-19 outbreak on our ongoing business operations.
31
Sources of Revenues
We derive our revenues from services for clients in a variety of different markets. These markets include our two largest markets, healthcare and student lending, as well as our other markets which include but are not limited to outsourced call center services, delinquent state and federal taxes and federal treasury and other receivables.
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Healthcare (1) | 43,328 | 54,454 | |||||
Recovery (2) | 89,626 | 83,785 | |||||
Customer Care / Outsourced Services | 17,478 | 17,429 | |||||
Total Revenues | $ | 150,432 | $ | 155,668 | |||
(1) | Includes $28.4 million related to the termination of the 2009 CMS Region A contract for the year ended December 31, 2018. |
(2) | Represents student lending, state and municipal tax authorities, IRS and Department of Treasury markets, select financial institutions, as well as Premiere Credit of North America. |
Healthcare
We derive revenues from both commercial and government clients in the healthcare market. Revenues earned under contracts in the healthcare market are driven by auditing, identifying, and sometimes recovering improperly paid claims through both automated and manual review of such claims. We are paid contingency fees by our clients based on a percentage of the dollar amount of improper claims recovered as a result of our efforts. The revenues we recognize are net of our estimate of claims that we believe will be overturned by appeal following payment by the provider.
For our commercial healthcare business, our business strategy is focused on utilizing our technology-enabled services platform to provide audit, third-party liability recovery and analytical services for private healthcare payers. We have entered into contracts with several private payers, although these contracts are in the early stage of implementation. Revenues from our commercial healthcare clients were $15.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to revenues of $12.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
On October 5, 2017, we announced that we were awarded the MSP CRC contract by the CMS. Under this agreement, we are responsible for identifying and recovering payments in situations where Medicare should not be the primary payer of healthcare claims because a beneficiary has other forms of insurance coverage, such as through an employer group health plan or certain other payers.
On October 26, 2016, CMS awarded two new RAC contracts, for audit Regions 1 and 5. The RAC contract award for Region 1 allows us to continue our audit of payments under Medicare’s Part A and Part B for all provider types other than DMEPOS and home health and hospice within an 11 state region in the Northeast and Midwest. The Region 5 RAC contract provides for the post-payment review of DMEPOS and home health and hospice claims nationally. While audit and recovery activity under the new contracts commenced in April 2017, the scope of audit permitted by CMS under these RAC contracts is limited to 0.5% of claims.
Healthcare providers have the right to appeal a claim and may pursue additional appeals if the initial appeal is found in favor of the healthcare insurer. Our total estimated liability for appeals was $1.0 million and $0.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. This represents our best estimate of the amount probable of being refunded to our healthcare clients following successful appeals of claims for which commissions were previously collected.
Recovery
Recovery market revenues are derived from student lending, IRS, state and municipal tax authorities, the Department of Treasury, select financial institutions and Premiere Credit of North America.
In the spring of 2017, the IRS named us as one of four companies to perform recovery services under its private collection program. This program, authorized under a federal law, calls for the use of private companies to recover outstanding inactive tax receivables on the government's behalf.
32
We also service the federal agency market, which consists of government debt subrogated to the Department of the Treasury by numerous different federal agencies, comprising a mix of commercial and individual obligations and a diverse range of receivables. These debts are managed by the Bureau of the Fiscal Service (formerly the Department of Financial Management Service), or FS, a bureau of the Department of the Treasury.
For state and municipal tax authorities, we analyze a portfolio of delinquent tax and other receivables placed with us, develop a recovery plan and execute a recovery process designed to maximize the recovery of funds. In some instances, we have also run state tax amnesty programs, which provide one-time relief for delinquent tax obligations, and other debtor management services for our clients. We currently have relationships with numerous state and municipal governments. Delinquent obligations are placed with us by our clients and we utilize a process that is similar to the student loan recovery process for recovering these obligations.
Student lending revenues are contract-based and consist primarily of contingency fees based on a specified percentage of the amount we enable our clients to recover. Our contingency fee percentage for a particular recovery depends on the type of recovery facilitated. Our clients in the student loan recovery market mainly consist of several of the largest guaranty agencies, or GAs. We believe the size and the composition of our student loan inventory at any point provides us with a significant degree of revenue visibility for our student loan revenues. Based on data compiled from over two decades of experience with the recovery of defaulted student loans, at the time we receive a placement of student loans, we are able to make a reasonably accurate estimate of the recovery outcomes likely to be derived from such placement and the revenues we are likely able to generate based on the anticipated recovery outcomes.
An important metric in evaluating our student lending business is Placement Volume. Our Placement Volume represents the dollar volume of defaulted student loans first placed with us during the specified period by public and private clients for recovery. Placement Volume allows us to measure and track trends in the amount of inventory our clients in the student lending market are placing with us during any period. The revenues associated with the recovery of a portion of these loans may be recognized in subsequent accounting periods, which assists management in estimating future revenues and in allocating resources necessary to address current Placement Volumes. As a result of the Department of Education’s termination of our January 2018 contract and its last procurement in its entirety, all of our Placement Volume is currently coming from Guaranty Agencies.
Year Ended December 31, | |||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||
(in thousands) | |||||
Student Lending Placement Volume | 2,547,364 | 2,571,700 | |||
There are five potential outcomes to the student loan recovery process from which we generate revenues. These outcomes include full repayment, recurring payments, rehabilitation, loan restructuring and wage garnishment. Of these five potential outcomes, our ability to rehabilitate defaulted student loans is the most significant component of our revenues in this market. Generally, a loan is considered successfully rehabilitated after the student loan borrower has made nine consecutive qualifying monthly payments and our client has notified us that it is recalling the loan. Once we have structured and implemented a repayment program for a defaulted borrower, we (i) earn a percentage of each periodic payment collected up to and including the final periodic payment prior to the loan being considered “rehabilitated” by our clients, and (ii) if the loan is “rehabilitated,” then we are paid a one-time percentage of the total amount of the remaining unpaid balance for each rehabilitated loan. The fees we are paid vary by recovery outcome as well as by contract. For non-government-supported student loans we are generally only paid contingency fees on two outcomes: full repayment or recurring repayments. The table below describes our typical fee structure for each of these five outcomes.
33
Student Loan Recovery Outcomes
Full Repayment | Recurring Payments | Rehabilitation | Loan Restructuring | Wage Garnishment | ||||
• Repayment in full of the loan | • Regular structured payments, typically according to a renegotiated payment plan | • After a defaulted borrower has made nine consecutive recurring payments, the loan is eligible for rehabilitation | • Restructure and consolidate a number of outstanding loans into a single loan, typically with one monthly payment and an extended maturity | • If we are unable to obtain voluntary repayment, payments may be obtained through wage garnishment after certain administrative requirements are met | ||||
• We are paid a percentage of the full payment that is made | • We are paid a percentage of each payment | • We are paid based on a percentage of the overall value of the rehabilitated loan | • We are paid based on a percentage of overall value of the restructured loan | • We are paid a percentage of each payment | ||||
Customer Care / Outsourced Services
We also derive revenues from default aversion and/or first party call center services for certain clients and the licensing of hosted technology solutions to certain clients. For our hosted technology services, we license our system and integrate our technology into our clients’ operations, for which we are paid a licensing fee. Our revenues for these services include contingency fees, fees based on dedicated headcount to our clients and hosted technology licensing fees.
Costs and Expenses
We generally report two categories of operating expenses: salaries and benefits and other operating expense. Salaries and benefits expenses consist primarily of salaries and performance incentives paid and benefits provided to our employees. Other operating expense includes expenses related to our use of subcontractors, other production related expenses, including costs associated with data processing, retrieval of medical records, printing and mailing services, amortization and other outside services, as well as general corporate and administrative expenses.
Factors Affecting Our Operating Results
Our results of operations are influenced by a number of factors, including costs associated with commencing contract operations, allocation of placement volume, claim recovery volume, contingency fees, regulatory matters, client retention and macroeconomic factors.
Costs Associated with Commencing New Client Contracts
When we obtain an engagement with a new client or a new contract with an existing client, it typically takes a long period of time to plan our services in detail, which includes integrating our technology, processes and resources with the client’s operations and hiring new employees, before we receive any revenues from the new client or new contract. Our clients may also experience delays in obtaining approvals or managing protests from unsuccessful bidders, such as the lengthy protests on the most recent contract procurement from the Department of Education, or delays associated with system implementations, such as the delays experienced with the implementation of our first RAC contract with CMS. If we are not able to pay the upfront expenses out of cash from operations or availability of borrowings under our lending arrangements, we may scale back our operations or alter our business plans, either of which could prevent of us from earning future revenues under any such new client or new contract engagements..
34
Allocation of Placement Volume
Our clients have the right to unilaterally set and increase or reduce the volume of defaulted student loans or other receivables that we service at any given time. In addition, many of our recovery contracts for student loans and other receivables are not exclusive, with our clients retaining multiple service providers to service portions of their portfolios. Accordingly, the number of delinquent student loans or other receivables that are placed with us may vary from time to time, which may have a significant effect on the amount and timing of our revenues. We believe the major factors that influence the number of placements we receive from our clients in the student loan market include our performance under our existing contracts and our ability to perform well against competitors for a particular client. To the extent that we perform well under our existing contracts and differentiate our services from those of our competitors, we may receive a relatively greater number of placements under these existing contracts and may improve our ability to obtain future contracts from these clients and other potential clients. Further, delays in placement volume, as well as acceleration of placement volume, from any of our large clients may cause our revenues and operating results to vary from quarter to quarter.
Typically, we are able to anticipate with reasonable accuracy the timing and volume of placements of defaulted student loans and other receivables based on historical patterns and regular communication with our clients. Occasionally, however, placements are delayed due to factors outside of our control.
Contingency Fees
Our revenues consist primarily of contract-based contingency fees. The contingency fee percentages that we earn are set by our clients or agreed upon during the bid process and may change from time to time either under the terms of existing contracts or pursuant to the terms of contract renewals.
Regulatory Matters
Each of the markets which we serve is highly regulated. Accordingly, changes in regulations that affect the types of loans, receivables and claims that we are able to service or the manner in which any such delinquent loans, receivables and claims can be recovered will affect our revenues and results of operations. For example, the passage of the Student Aid and Fiscal Responsibility Act, or SAFRA, in 2010 had the effect of transferring the origination of all government-supported student loans to the Department of Education, thereby ending all student loan originations guaranteed by the GAs. Loans guaranteed by the GAs represented approximately 70% of government-supported student loans originated in 2009. While the GAs will continue to service existing outstanding student loans for years to come, this legislation means that there will be no further growth in student loans held by GAs. Further, we are seeing a larger amount of defaulted student loans in our GA client portfolios that have been previously rehabilitated and by regulation are not subject to rehabilitation for a second time. In addition, our entry into the healthcare market was facilitated by passage of the Tax Relief and Health Care Act of 2006, which mandated CMS to contract with private firms to audit Medicare claims in an effort to increase the recovery of improper Medicare payments. Any changes to the regulations that affect the student loan industry or the recovery of defaulted student loans or the Medicare program generally or the audit and recovery of Medicare claims could have a significant impact on our revenues and results of operations.
Client Contract Cancellation
Substantially all of our contracts entitle our clients to unilaterally terminate their contractual relationship with us at any time without penalty. If we lose one or more of our significant clients, including if one of our significant clients is consolidated by an entity that does not use our services, if the terms of compensation for our services change or if there is a reduction in the level of placements provided by any of these clients, our revenues could decline.
Macroeconomic Factors
Certain macroeconomic factors influence our business and results of operations. These include the increasing volume of student loan originations in the U.S. as a result of increased tuition costs and student enrollment, the default rate of student loan borrowers, the growth in Medicare expenditures or claims made to private healthcare providers resulting from changes in healthcare costs or the healthcare industry taken as a whole, as well as the fiscal budget tightening of federal, state and local governments as a result of general economic weakness and lower tax revenues.
35
Critical Accounting Policies
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets, liabilities, revenues, costs and expenses and related disclosures. We base our estimates on historical experience and on various other assumptions that we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances. In many instances, we could have reasonably used different accounting estimates, and in other instances changes in the accounting estimates are reasonably likely to occur from period-to-period. Accordingly, actual results could differ significantly from the estimates made by our management. To the extent that there are material differences between these estimates and actual results, our future financial statement presentation, financial condition, results of operations and cash flows will be affected. We believe that the accounting policies discussed below are critical to understanding our historical and future performance, as these policies relate to the more significant areas involving management’s judgments and estimates.
Revenue Recognition
We derive our revenues primarily from providing recovery services and healthcare audit services. Revenues are recognized when control of these services is transferred to our customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration expect to be entitled to in exchange for those services.
We determine revenue recognition through the following steps:
• | Identification of the contract with a customer |
• | Identification of the performance obligations in the contract |
• | Determination of the transaction price |
• | Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract |
• | Recognition of revenue when, or as, the performance obligations are satisfied |
We account for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.
Our contracts generally contain a single performance obligation, delivered over time as a series of services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to a client, as the promise to transfer the individual services is not separately identifiable from other promises in the contracts and, therefore, not distinct. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, we allocate the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation using our best estimate of the standalone selling price of each distinct service in the contract. We determine the standalone selling prices by taking into consideration the value of the services being provided, the client type and how similar services are priced in other contracts on a standalone basis.
Our contracts are composed primarily of variable consideration. Fees earned under our recovery service contracts consist primarily of contingency fees based on a specified percentage of the amount we enable our clients to recover. The contingency fee percentage for a particular recovery depends on the type of recovery or claim facilitated. In certain contracts we can earn additional performance-based consideration determined based on its performance relative to a client’s other contractors providing similar services.
Revenue from contingency fees earned upon recovery of funds is generally recognized as amounts are invoiced based on either the ‘as-invoiced’ practical expedient when such amounts reflect the value of the services completed to-date, or an output measure based on milestones which is used to measure progress of the satisfaction of its performance obligation. We estimate any performance-based variable consideration and recognizes such revenue over the performance period only if it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. Under certain contracts, consideration can include periodic performance-based bonuses which can be awarded based on our performance under the specific contract. These performance-based awards are considered variable and may be constrained by us until there is not a risk of a material reversal.
For contracts that contain a refund right, these amounts are considered variable consideration, and we estimate our refund liability for each claim and recognizes revenue net of such estimate.
36
We generally either apply the as-invoiced practical expedient where our right to consideration corresponds directly to our right to invoice our clients, or the variable consideration allocation exception where the variable consideration is attributable to one or more, but not all, of the services promised in a series of distinct services that form part of a single performance obligation. As such, we have elected the optional exemptions related to the as-invoiced practical expedient and the variable consideration allocation exception whereby the disclosure of the amount of transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations is not required. We exercise judgment to estimate the amount of constraint on variable consideration based on the facts and circumstances of the relevant contract operations and availability of data. Although we believe the estimates made are reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact the amount of variable consideration.
We have applied the as-invoiced practical expedient and the variable consideration allocation exception to contracts with performance obligations that have an average remaining duration of less than a year.
Goodwill
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and related costs over the fair value assigned to the net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually in December, or more frequently if certain indicators are present. We may first assess qualitative factors for indicators of impairment to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company changed its annual assessment to December in 2019 from November in 2018 since the Company had performed interim quantitative impairment assessments during 2019. The change in the annual assessment date did not have a material impact on our analysis.
In performing the quantitative goodwill test, if the carrying value of the Company, as one reporting unit, exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired. The amount of impairment loss is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the reporting unit. Impairment testing is based upon the best information available including estimates of fair value which incorporate assumptions marketplace participants would use in making their estimates of fair value. Significant assumptions and estimates are required, including, but not limited to, the Company’s market capitalization, projecting future cash flows, determining appropriate discount rates and terminal growth rates, and other assumptions, to estimate the fair value of goodwill. Although the Company believes the assumptions and estimates made are reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact the amount of impairment. The Company’s goodwill may be at risk for further impairment should there be further decline in the Company’s market capitalization.
The Company recorded an impairment to goodwill of $7.2 million as of December 31, 2019. This is mainly due to the decrease in the Company’s stock price and associated market capitalization. There has been significant negative impact to the global economy and the public securities markets as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic since March 2020. As a result, the Company’s goodwill is at elevated risk of further impairment should there be further decline in the Company’s stock price and related market capitalization, which may result in potentially material charge to earnings.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets or intangibles may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
A discussion of our financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to the year ended December 31, 2018 appears below under the captions "Results of Operations" and "Liquidity and Capital Resources." A discussion of our financial performance for the year ended December 31, 2018 compared to the year ended December 31, 2017 can be found under the same captions in Item 7 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018, filed with the SEC on April 1, 2019, which is available free of charge on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and our Investor Relations website at www.performantcorp.com. These website addresses are intended to be inactive, textual reference only. None of the materials on, or accessible through these websites are part of this report or are incorporated by reference herein.
37
Results of Operations
Year Ended December 31, 2019 compared to the Year Ended December 31, 2018
The following table represents our historical operating results for the periods presented:
Year Ended December 31, | ||||||||||||||
2019 | 2018 | $ Change | % Change | |||||||||||
(in thousands) | ||||||||||||||
Consolidated Statements of Operations Data: | ||||||||||||||
Revenues | $ | 150,432 | $ | 155,668 | $ | (5,236 | ) | (3 | )% | |||||
Operating expenses: | ||||||||||||||
Salaries and benefits | 115,194 | 96,144 | 19,050 | 20 | % | |||||||||
Other operating expense | 47,687 | 58,333 | (10,646 | ) | (18 | )% | ||||||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets | 7,200 | 2,988 | 4,212 | 141 | % | |||||||||
Total operating expenses | 170,081 | 157,465 | 12,616 | 8 | % | |||||||||
Loss from operations | (19,649 | ) | (1,797 | ) | 17,852 | 993 | % | |||||||
Interest expense | (7,589 | ) | (4,699 | ) | 2,890 | 62 | % | |||||||
Interest income | 41 | 28 | 13 | 46 | % | |||||||||
Loss before benefit from income taxes | (27,197 | ) | (6,468 | ) | 20,729 | 320 | % | |||||||
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | (377 | ) | 1,542 | 1,919 | (124 | )% | ||||||||
Net Loss | $ | (26,820 | ) | $ | (8,010 | ) | $ | 18,810 | 235 | % | ||||
Revenues
Total revenues were $150.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $5.2 million or 3%, compared to total revenues of $155.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Healthcare revenues were $43.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, representing a decrease of $11.1 million, or 20%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. This decrease was due primarily to revenues of $28.4 million recognized in 2018 as a result of the release of the appeals reserve in connection with the termination of our 2009 CMS Region. Excluding revenues associated with the termination of our 2009 CMS Region A contract in 2018, healthcare revenues for the year ended December 31, 2019, increased $17.3 million, or 66%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018, primarily due to increases in revenues earned under our CMS RAC and MSP CRC contracts and from our commercial healthcare clients during the year ended December 31, 2019.
Recovery revenues were $89.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, representing an increase of $5.8 million, or 7%, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. This increase was primarily a result of higher revenues from our Premiere subsidiary, which was acquired in the third quarter of 2018, offset by the reduced revenues from Great Lakes Higher Education Guaranty Corporation, which terminated our contract in 2017.
Customer Care / Outsourced Services revenues were $17.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, consistent with revenues for the year ended December 31, 2018.
Salaries and Benefits
Salaries and benefits expense were $115.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $19.1 million, or 20%, compared to salaries and benefits expense of $96.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in salaries and benefits expense was primarily due to the full year effect in 2019 of the increase in headcount as a result of the acquisition of Premiere in the third quarter of 2018.
38
Other Operating Expense
Other operating expense was $47.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, a decrease of $10.6 million, or 18%, compared to other operating expense of $58.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. The decrease in other operating expenses was primarily due to a $7.1 million derecognition of subcontractor receivable associated with the termination of the 2009 CMS Region A contract in 2018, a $1.9 million allowance for doubtful accounts against subcontractor receivable in 2018, and $3.5 million in lower third party fees in 2019, offset by $1.9 million in higher communication and postage expenses in 2019.
Impairment of Goodwill and Intangible Assets
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets was $7.2 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, an increase of $4.2 million, compared to the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase was due to a non-cash impairment charge of $7.2 million recognized in 2019 related to goodwill, as compared to a non-cash impairment charge of $3.0 million recognized in 2018 related to the write-off of the Great Lakes customer relationship intangible asset.
Loss from Operations
As a result of the factors described above, loss from operations was $19.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to loss from operations of $1.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, representing an increased loss of $17.9 million.
Interest Expense
Interest expense was $7.6 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to $4.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2018, representing an increase of 62%. Interest expense increased due to an increase in outstanding loan balance of $21 million during 2019 as a result of additional term loan borrowings and a higher interest rate in 2019 compared to 2018.
Income Taxes
The income tax benefit was $0.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 compared to an income tax expense of $1.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Our effective income tax rate increased to 2% for the year ended December 31, 2019 from (23%) for the year ended December 31, 2018. The increase in the effective tax rate is primarily driven by the current year benefit from income taxes related to the true-up of tax provision to tax return and decreases in the state tax liabilities, compared to the 2018 provision for income taxes related to an increase in the valuation allowance against deferred tax assets and state tax expense.
Net Loss
As a result of the factors described above, net loss was $26.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, which represents an increase in net loss of $18.8 million compared to net loss of $8.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2018.
39
Liquidity and Capital Resources
Our primary sources of liquidity are cash flows from operations, and cash and cash equivalents on hand. Cash and cash equivalents, which includes restricted cash and consists primarily of cash on deposit with banks, totaled $5.0 million as of December 31, 2019, compared to $7.3 million as of December 31, 2018.
Our ability to fund our business plans, capital expenditures and to fund our other liquidity needs depends on our financial and operating performance, which is subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial, business and other factors beyond our control and the availability of borrowings under our existing lending facility. Following our $5 million Additional Term Loan draw on September 25, 2019, we no longer have any remaining borrowing capacity under our existing Credit Agreement. Our current financial projections show that we expect to be able to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit us to fund our ongoing and planned business operations and to fund our other liquidity needs. If, however, we are required to obtain additional borrowings to fund our ongoing or future business operations, there can be no assurance that we will be successful in obtaining such additional borrowings or upon terms that are acceptable to us. The recent COVID-19 pandemic has led certain of our customers to delay the recovery and audit services that we provide as a result of the economic hardships that may be faced by a large portion of the population, which may have a material negative impact on our cash flow from operations. For example, pursuant to the terms of the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) enacted in March 2020, the U.S. Federal government suspended payments, ceased accruing interest, and stopped involuntary collections of payments (e.g., wage garnishments) for student loans owned by the Department of Education through September 30, 2020. Further, a prolonged period of generating lower cash flows from operations as a result of the COVID-19 pandemic could adversely affect our financial condition and the achievement of our strategic objectives. Conditions in the financial and credit markets may also limit the availability of funding or increase the cost of funding, which could adversely affect our business, financial position and results of operations. While we believe our financial projections are attainable, there can be no assurances that our financial results will be recognized in a time frame necessary to meet our ongoing cash requirements. If our cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund our planned business operations or to fund our other liquidity needs, we may need to reduce or delay capital expenditures, alter our business plans, curtail the services we provide to our current or future clients, sell assets or operations, seek additional capital, restructure or refinance our indebtedness, any of which could have an adverse effect on our financial condition and results of operations.
The $1.3 million decrease in the balance of our cash and cash equivalents from December 31, 2018 to December 31, 2019, was primarily due to $21.0 million in additional term loan borrowings under our Credit Agreement, offset by a $26.8 million net loss and $2.5 million in repayments of principal on long-term debt for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Net cash used in operating activities | $ | (15,423 | ) | $ | (12,149 | ) | |
Net cash used in investing activities | (4,856 | ) | (5,360 | ) | |||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 17,999 | 1,297 | |||||
Cash flows used in operating activities
Cash used in operating activities was $15.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, compared to cash used in operating activities of $12.1 million for the same period in 2018. The decrease included a net loss of $26.8 million, and an increase in trade receivables of $6.3 million, which was partially offset by $11.1 million in non-cash adjustments.
Operating activities used $12.1 million of cash during the year ended December 31, 2018. This included a net loss of $8.0 million in 2018, an increase in trade receivables of $6.7 million, and a decrease in the net payable to client of $2.9 million, which was partially offset by various working capital fluctuations such as a decrease in our income tax receivable of $6.7 million primarily due to the carryback of the net operating loss to previous years resulting in a tax refund.
40
Cash flows used in investing activities
Cash used in investing activities of $4.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was mainly for capital expenditures related to information technology, data storage, hardware, telecommunication systems and security enhancements to our information technology systems.
Investing activities resulted in cash outflow of $5.4 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 and was used primarily for capital expenditures related to information technology, hardware, data storage and security enhancements to our operating software offset by the cash and cash equivalents acquired as a result of the acquisition of Premiere.
Cash flows from financing activities
Cash provided by financing activities of $18.0 million for the year ended December 31, 2019 was primarily attributable to $21.0 million in additional term loan borrowings under our Credit Agreement, partially offset by $2.5 million in repayments of long-term debt during the same period.
Cash provided from financing activities of $1.3 million during the year ended December 31, 2018 was primarily due to additional borrowings on notes payable of $4.0 million, offset by the repayment of principal on outstanding debt of $2.2 million.
Restricted Cash
As of December 31, 2019, restricted cash included in current assets on our consolidated balance sheet was $1.6 million. Restricted cash is held in certificates of deposit as collateral for letters of credit issued by a bank on our behalf.
Long-term Debt
On August 7, 2017, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Performant Business Services, Inc. (the "Borrower"), entered into a credit agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) with ECMC Group, Inc. ("ECMC"). Before the amendment described below, the Credit Agreement provided for a term loan facility in the initial amount of $44 million (the “Initial Term Loan”) and for up to $15 million of additional term loans (“Additional Term Loans” and together with the Initial Term Loan, the “Loans”) which original Additional Term Loans were initially able to be drawn until the second anniversary of the funding of the Initial Term Loans, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions. On August 11, 2017, the Initial Term Loan was advanced (the "Closing Date") and the proceeds were applied to repay all outstanding amounts under our prior credit agreement with Madison Capital Funding LLC as administrative agent ("the Prior Credit Agreement"). On August 31, 2018, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement to among other things (i) extend the maturity date of the Initial Term Loan and any Additional Term Loans by one year to August 2021, (ii) expand the Additional Term Loans commitment from $15 million to $25 million, (iii) extend the period during which the Additional Term Loans can be borrowed by one year to August 2020, and (iv) relieve the Borrower from its obligation to comply with the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement during the six fiscal quarters following the Premiere acquisition.
On October 15, 2018, the Company borrowed $4 million of the $25 million available as Additional Term Loans under the Credit Agreement. On March 21, 2019, we entered into Amendment No. 3 to the Credit Agreement to among other things relieve the Borrower from its obligation to comply with the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement during the six fiscal quarters following the beginning of the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter of 2018. On April 5, 2019 and May 15, 2019, we borrowed $5 million and $6 million, respectively. On August 6, 2019 and September 25, 2019, the Company borrowed $5 million and $5 million, respectively. As of September 30, 2019, the Company has borrowed all of the $25 million available as Additional Term Loans.
As of December 31, 2019, $64.3 million was outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
We have the option to extend the maturity of the Loans for two additional one-year periods, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions. The Loans bear interest at the one-month LIBOR rate (subject to a 1% per annum floor) plus a margin which may vary from 5.5% per annum to 10.0% per annum based on our total debt to EBITDA ratio. Our annual interest rate at December 31, 2019 was 11.8%, and at December 31, 2018 was 8.0%. We are required to pay 5% of the original principal balance of the Loans annually in quarterly installments and to make mandatory prepayments of the Loans with a percentage of our excess cash flow which may vary between 75% and 0% depending on our total debt to EBITDA ratio and from the net cash proceeds of certain asset dispositions and debt not otherwise permitted under the Credit Agreement, in each case, subject to the lender's right to decline to receive such payments.
41
The Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive financial covenants which are not effective until the quarter ending June 30, 2020, at which point, we will be required to (1) achieve a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 through December 31, 2020, 1.25 to 1.0 through June 30, 2021, and 1.25 to 1.0 through June 30, 2022 if the maturity date of the Loans is extended until the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date and (2) maintain a maximum total debt to EBITDA ratio of 6.00 to 1.00. The Credit Agreement also contains covenants that restrict the Company and its subsidiaries’ ability to incur certain types or amounts of indebtedness, incur liens on certain assets, make material changes in corporate structure or the nature of its business, dispose of material assets, engage in a change in control transaction, make certain foreign investments, enter into certain restrictive agreements, or engage in certain transactions with affiliates. The Credit Agreement also contains various customary events of default, including with respect to change of control of the Company or its ownership of the Borrower.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of our subsidiaries’ assets and are guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries, other than the Borrower. Upon borrowing of the Additional Term Loans, we were required to issue additional warrants at the same Exercise Price to purchase up to an aggregate of 77,267 additional shares of common stock (which represents approximately 0.15% of our diluted common stock calculated using the “treasury stock” method as defined under U.S. GAAP for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2017) for each $1.0 million of such Additional Term Loans. Similarly, upon our election to extend the maturity of the Loans for additional one year periods, we will be required to issue additional warrants at the same Exercise Price to purchase up to an aggregate of 515,110 additional shares of common stock for the first year’s extension, and to purchase up to an aggregate of 772,665 additional shares of common stock for the second year’s extension (which represent approximately 1.0% and 1.5% of our diluted common stock for the first and second years, respectively, calculated using the “treasury stock” method as defined under U.S. GAAP for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2017).
Contractual Obligations
The following summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2019:
Payments Due by Period | |||||||||||||||||||
Contractual Obligations | Total | Less Than 1 Year | 1-3 Years | 3-5 Years | More Than 5 Years | ||||||||||||||
Long-Term Debt Obligations | $ | 64,313 | $ | 3,450 | $ | 60,863 | $ | — | $ | — | |||||||||
Interest Payments | 9,131 | 5,772 | 3,359 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Operating Lease Obligations | 8,720 | 3,192 | 3,990 | 1,141 | 397 | ||||||||||||||
Purchase Obligations | 7,175 | 6,118 | 1,058 | — | — | ||||||||||||||
Total | $ | 89,339 | $ | 18,532 | $ | 69,270 | $ | 1,141 | $ | 397 | |||||||||
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We have no off-balance sheet arrangements.
Adjusted EBITDA and Adjusted Net Loss
To provide investors with additional information regarding our financial results, we have disclosed in the table below and within this report adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss, both of which are non-GAAP financial measures. We have provided a reconciliation below of adjusted EBITDA to net loss and adjusted net loss to net loss, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure to these non-GAAP financial measures.
We have included adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss in this report because they are key measures used by our management and board of directors to understand and evaluate our core operating performance and trends and to prepare and approve our annual budget. Accordingly, we believe that adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss provide useful information to investors and analysts in understanding and evaluating our operating results in the same manner as our management and board of directors.
42
Our use of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss has limitations as an analytical tool, and you should not consider it in isolation or as a substitute for analysis of our results as reported under GAAP. Some of these limitations are:
• | although depreciation and amortization are non-cash charges, the assets being depreciated and amortized may have to be replaced in the future, and adjusted EBITDA does not reflect cash capital expenditure requirements for such replacements or for new capital expenditure requirements; |
• | adjusted EBITDA does not reflect interest expense on our indebtedness; |
• | adjusted EBITDA does not reflect changes in, or cash requirements for, our working capital needs; |
• | adjusted EBITDA does not reflect tax payments; |
• | adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss do not reflect the potentially dilutive impact of equity-based compensation; |
• | adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss do not reflect the impact of certain non-operating expenses resulting from matters we do not consider to be indicative of our core operating performance; and |
• | other companies may calculate adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss differently than we do, which reduces its usefulness as a comparative measure. |
Because of these limitations, you should consider adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss alongside other financial performance measures, including net loss and our other GAAP results.
The following tables present a reconciliation of adjusted EBITDA and adjusted net loss for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 to actual net loss for these periods:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA: | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (26,820 | ) | $ | (8,010 | ) | |
Provision for (benefit from) income taxes | (377 | ) | 1,542 | ||||
Interest expense | 7,589 | 4,699 | |||||
Interest income | (41 | ) | (28 | ) | |||
Client contract termination settlement (8) | (677 | ) | — | ||||
Non-core operating expenses (7) | 309 | — | |||||
Earnout mark-to-market (6) | (1,223 | ) | — | ||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8,536 | 10,234 | |||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets (3) | 7,200 | 2,988 | |||||
CMS Region A contract termination | — | (19,415 | ) | ||||
Stock based compensation | 2,311 | 2,750 | |||||
Adjusted EBITDA | $ | (3,193 | ) | $ | (5,240 | ) | |
43
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Reconciliation of Adjusted Net Income: | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (26,820 | ) | $ | (8,010 | ) | |
Stock based compensation | 2,311 | 2,750 | |||||
Amortization of intangibles (1) | 239 | 3,758 | |||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets (3) | 7,200 | 2,988 | |||||
Deferred financing amortization costs (2) | 1,286 | 1,221 | |||||
Client contract termination settlement (8) | (677 | ) | — | ||||
Non-core operating expenses (7) | 309 | — | |||||
Earnout mark-to-market (6) | (1,223 | ) | — | ||||
CMS Region A contract termination (5) | — | (19,415 | ) | ||||
Tax adjustments (4) | (2,598 | ) | 2,392 | ||||
Adjusted Net loss | $ | (19,973 | ) | $ | (14,316 | ) | |
(1) | Represents amortization of capitalized intangible assets related to the acquisition of Performant by an affiliate of Parthenon Capital Partners in 2004, an acquisition in the first quarter of 2012 to enhance our analytics capabilities, and an acquisition of Premiere Credit of North America, LLC in the third quarter of 2018. |
(2) | Represents amortization of capitalized financing costs related to our Credit Agreement for 2018. |
(3) | Represents a goodwill impairment charge in 2019 and an intangible assets impairment charge related to Great Lakes customer relationship in 2018. |
(4) | Represents tax adjustments assuming a marginal tax rate of 27.5% for 2019 and 2018. |
(5) | Represents the net impact of the termination of our 2009 CMS Region A contract during 2018, comprised of release of an aggregate of $28.4 million of the estimated liability for appeals and the net payable to client balances into revenue, net of derecognition of $9.0 million of prepaid expenses and other current assets, with a charge to other operating expenses, reflecting accrued receivables associated with amounts due from subcontractors for decided and yet-to-be decided appeals. |
(6) | Represents the change from prior reporting periods in the fair value of the potential earnout consideration payable to ECMC group in connection with the Premiere acquisition. |
(7) | Represents professional fees related to strategic corporate development activities. |
(8) | Represents a contract termination settlement from the Department of Education in 2019. |
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
See "Recent Accounting Pronouncements" in Note 1(u) of the Consolidated Financial Statements included in Part IV - Item 15 of this report.
ITEM 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures about Market Risk
We do not hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. We conduct all of our business in U.S. currency and therefore do not have any direct foreign currency risk. We do have exposure to changes in interest rates with respect to the borrowings under our senior secured credit facility, which bear interest at a variable rate based on LIBOR. For example, if the interest rate on our borrowings increased 100 basis points (1%) from the credit facility floor of 1.0%, our annual interest expense would increase by approximately $0.7 million.
While we currently hold our excess cash in an operating account, in the future we may invest all or a portion of our excess cash in short-term investments, including money market accounts, where returns may reflect current interest rates. As a result, market interest rate changes impact our interest expense and interest income. This impact will depend on variables such as the magnitude of interest rate changes and the level of our borrowings under our credit facility or excess cash balances.
44
ITEM 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data
Our consolidated financial statements and notes thereto and the reports of Baker Tilly Virchow Krause LLP are set forth in the Index to Financial Statements under Item 15, Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules, and is incorporated herein by reference.
ITEM 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None.
ITEM 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain a system of disclosure controls and procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our Chief Executive Officer and the Chief Accounting Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognized that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving the desired control objectives.
Management, with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and our Chief Accounting Officer, has evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the Exchange Act, as of the fiscal year covered by this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Based on that evaluation, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were functioning effectively at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2019.
Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act) to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of our financial reporting and the preparation of our consolidated financial statements for external purposes in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“US GAAP”). Under the supervision of, and with the participation of our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Accounting Officer, management assessed the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2019. The criteria established in “Internal Control Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) were updated in May 2013, when COSO issued an updated framework (the "2013 COSO Framework"). Management based its assessment on the criteria established in the 2013 COSO Framework. Based on this evaluation, management concluded that its internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2019.
Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There was no change in our internal control over financial reporting during the year ended December 31, 2019, that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting, other than those noted above.
ITEM 9B. Other Information
None.
45
PART III
ITEM 10. Information About our Executive Officers
This Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies from the Registrant’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 11. Executive Compensation
This Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies from the Registrant’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters
This Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies from the Registrant’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence
This Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies from the Registrant’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
ITEM 14. Principal Accounting Fees and Services
This Item is incorporated by reference to our definitive proxy statement on Schedule 14A, to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission in connection with the solicitation of proxies from the Registrant’s 2020 Annual Meeting of Stockholders.
PART IV
ITEM 15. Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules
(a) Financial Statements
(1) Financial Statements. The financial statements filed as part of this report are identified in the Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page F-1.
(2) Financial Statement Schedules. See Item 15(c) below.
(3) Exhibits. See Item 15(b) below.
46
(b) Exhibits
The following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated by reference to exhibits previously filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission.
Exhibit Number | Description |
3.1 | |
3.2 | |
4.1 | |
4.2* | |
10.1 | |
10.2 | |
10.3 | |
10.4 | |
10.5 | |
10.6 | |
10.7 | |
10.8 | |
10.9 | |
47
Exhibit Number | Description |
21* | |
23.1* | |
24* | |
31.1* | |
31.2* | |
32.1* | |
32.2* | |
101.INS* | XBRL Instance Document |
101.SCH* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Scheme |
101.CAL* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Calculation Linkbase |
101.DEF* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Definition Linkbase Document |
101.LAB* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Label Linkbase |
101.PRE* | XBRL Taxonomy Extension Presentation Linkbase |
104 | Cover Page Interactive Data File (embedded within the Inline XBRL document |
*Filed herewith
(c) Financial Statements and Schedules
Schedules not listed above have been omitted because they are not applicable or required, or the information required to be set forth therein is included in the Consolidated Financial Statements or Notes hereto.
ITEM 16. Form 10-K Summary
Not applicable
48
Index to Consolidated Financial Statements
Page | |
Consolidated Financial Statements of Performant Financial Corporation and Subsidiaries as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and for the years ended December 31, 2019, and 2018 | |
F-1
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Stockholders and the Board of Directors of Performant Financial Corporation:
Opinion on the Consolidated Financial Statements
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Performant Financial Corporation and subsidiaries (the "Company") as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then ended, and the related notes and financial statement Schedule II (collectively the "consolidated financial statements"). In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, and the results of its operations and its cash flow for the years then ended, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
Adoption of New Accounting Standard
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company changed its method for accounting for leases in 2019 due to the adoption of ASU No. 2016-02, Leases (Topic 842).
Basis for Opinion
These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company's consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) ("PCAOB") and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated financial statements are free of material misstatement, whether due to error or fraud. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. As part of our audit we are required to obtain an understanding of internal control over financial reporting but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion.
Our audits included performing procedures to assess the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated financial statements, whether due to error or fraud, and performing procedures that respond to those risks. Such procedures included examining, on a test basis, evidence regarding the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial statements. Our audits also included evaluating the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements. We believe that our audits provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
Emphasis of Matter
As discussed in Note 1 to the consolidated financial statements, the Company has a recent history of net losses and negative cash flows from operations. Management also expects that the Company’s operations will be impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic. If the Company cannot generate sufficient cash flows from operations, the Company will require additional financing to fund future operations. Management’s evaluation of these conditions, as well as its plans to mitigate these matters are described in Note 1. Our opinion is not modified with respect to this matter.
We have served as the Company's auditor since 2018.
/s/ BAKER TILLY VIRCHOW KRAUSE, LLP
Milwaukee, Wisconsin
April 29, 2019
F-2
PERFORMANT FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
Assets | December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | |||||
Current assets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 3,373 | $ | 5,462 | |||
Restricted cash | 1,622 | 1,813 | |||||
Trade accounts receivable, net of allowance for doubtful accounts of $237 and $22, respectively | 27,170 | 20,879 | |||||
Contract assets | 1,339 | — | |||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 3,329 | 3,420 | |||||
Income tax receivable | 164 | 179 | |||||
Total current assets | 36,997 | 31,753 | |||||
Property, equipment, and leasehold improvements, net | 18,769 | 22,255 | |||||
Identifiable intangible assets, net | 925 | 1,160 | |||||
Goodwill | 74,372 | 81,572 | |||||
ROU Assets | 6,834 | — | |||||
Other assets | 975 | 1,019 | |||||
Total assets | $ | 138,872 | $ | 137,759 | |||
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity | |||||||
Current liabilities: | |||||||
Current maturities of notes payable to related party, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $130 and $126, respectively | $ | 3,320 | $ | 2,224 | |||
Accrued salaries and benefits | 6,126 | 5,759 | |||||
Accounts payable | 2,532 | 1,402 | |||||
Other current liabilities | 3,514 | 3,414 | |||||
Deferred revenue | 83 | 1,078 | |||||
Estimated liability for appeals and disputes | 1,018 | 210 | |||||
Earnout payable | 62 | — | |||||
Lease liabilities | 2,775 | — | |||||
Total current liabilities | 19,430 | 14,087 | |||||
Notes payable to related party, net of current portion and unamortized discount and debt issuance costs of $2,301 and $2,345, respectively | 58,562 | 41,105 | |||||
Deferred income taxes | 35 | 22 | |||||
Earnout payable | 475 | 1,936 | |||||
Lease liabilities | 4,984 | — | |||||
Other liabilities | 1,761 | 3,383 | |||||
Total liabilities | 85,247 | 60,533 | |||||
Commitments and contingencies | |||||||
Stockholders’ equity: | |||||||
Common stock, $0.0001 par value. Authorized, 500,000 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively; issued and outstanding, 53,900 and 52,999 shares at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively | 5 | 5 | |||||
Additional paid-in capital | 80,589 | 77,370 | |||||
Accumulated deficit | (26,969 | ) | (149 | ) | |||
Total stockholders’ equity | 53,625 | 77,226 | |||||
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity | $ | 138,872 | $ | 137,759 | |||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
PERFORMANT FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(In thousands, except per share amounts)
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Revenues | $ | 150,432 | $ | 155,668 | |||
Operating expenses: | |||||||
Salaries and benefits | 115,194 | 96,144 | |||||
Other operating expenses | 47,687 | 58,333 | |||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets | 7,200 | 2,988 | |||||
Total operating expenses | 170,081 | 157,465 | |||||
Loss from operations | (19,649 | ) | (1,797 | ) | |||
Interest expense | (7,589 | ) | (4,699 | ) | |||
Interest income | 41 | 28 | |||||
Loss before (benefit from) provision for income taxes | (27,197 | ) | (6,468 | ) | |||
(Benefit from) provision for income taxes | (377 | ) | 1,542 | ||||
Net loss | $ | (26,820 | ) | $ | (8,010 | ) | |
Net loss per share attributable to common shareholders (see Note 1) | |||||||
Basic | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | |
Diluted | $ | (0.50 | ) | $ | (0.15 | ) | |
Weighted average shares (see Note 1) | |||||||
Basic | 53,468 | 52,064 | |||||
Diluted | 53,468 | 52,064 | |||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
PERFORMANT FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(In thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Net loss | $ | (26,820 | ) | $ | (8,010 | ) | |
Other comprehensive loss: | |||||||
Foreign currency translation adjustment | — | (32 | ) | ||||
Comprehensive loss | $ | (26,820 | ) | $ | (8,042 | ) | |
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
PERFORMANT FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity
(In thousands)
Common Stock | Additional Paid-In Capital | Retained Earnings (Accumulated Deficit) | Total | ||||||||||||||||
Shares | Amount | ||||||||||||||||||
Balance, January 1, 2018 | 51,085 | $ | 5 | $ | 72,459 | $ | 7,861 | $ | 80,325 | ||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | 914 | — | (476 | ) | — | (476 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | — | 2,750 | — | 2,750 | ||||||||||||||
Shares issued in conjunction with agreement to purchase Premiere Credit of North America, LLC. | 1,000 | — | 2,420 | — | 2,420 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of warrant issued in debt financing | — | — | 249 | — | 249 | ||||||||||||||
Other comprehensive loss | — | (32 | ) | (32 | ) | ||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | (8,010 | ) | (8,010 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2018 | 52,999 | 5 | 77,370 | (149 | ) | 77,226 | |||||||||||||
Common stock issued under stock plans, net of shares withheld for employee taxes | 716 | — | (433 | ) | — | (433 | ) | ||||||||||||
Stock-based compensation expense | — | — | 2,311 | — | 2,311 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of warrant issued in debt financing | — | — | 1,165 | — | 1,165 | ||||||||||||||
Recognition of earnout shares issued | 185 | — | 176 | — | 176 | ||||||||||||||
Net loss | — | — | — | (26,820 | ) | (26,820 | ) | ||||||||||||
Balance, December 31, 2019 | 53,900 | $ | 5 | $ | 80,589 | $ | (26,969 | ) | $ | 53,625 | |||||||||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
PERFORMANT FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(In thousands)
For the Years Ended December 31, | |||||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Cash flows from operating activities: | |||||||
Net loss | $ | (26,820 | ) | $ | (8,010 | ) | |
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities: | |||||||
Loss on disposal of assets | 44 | 44 | |||||
Release of net payable to client related to contract termination | — | (9,860 | ) | ||||
Release of estimated liability for appeals due to termination of contract | — | (18,531 | ) | ||||
Derecognition of subcontractor receivable for appeals due to termination of contract | — | 5,535 | |||||
Derecognition of subcontractor receivable for overturned claims | — | 1,536 | |||||
Provision for doubtful account for subcontractor receivable | — | 1,868 | |||||
Impairment of goodwill and intangible assets | 7,200 | 2,988 | |||||
Depreciation and amortization | 8,536 | 10,234 | |||||
ROU asset amortization | 2,589 | — | |||||
Gain on lease modification | (137 | ) | — | ||||
Deferred income taxes | 13 | 490 | |||||
Stock-based compensation | 2,311 | 2,750 | |||||
Interest expense from debt issuance costs | 1,286 | 1,221 | |||||
Earnout mark-to-market | (1,223 | ) | (218 | ) | |||
Changes in operating assets and liabilities: | |||||||
Trade accounts receivable | (6,291 | ) | (6,695 | ) | |||
Contract assets | (1,339 | ) | — | ||||
Prepaid expenses and other current assets | 91 | 895 | |||||
Income tax receivable | 15 | 6,660 | |||||
Other assets | 40 | 69 | |||||
Accrued salaries and benefits | 367 | 220 | |||||
Accounts payable | 1,130 | (445 | ) | ||||
Deferred revenue and other current liabilities | (895 | ) | (657 | ) | |||
Estimated liability for appeals and disputes | 808 | (76 | ) | ||||
Net payable to client | — | (2,940 | ) | ||||
Lease liabilities | (2,786 | ) | — | ||||
Other liabilities | (362 | ) | 773 | ||||
Net cash used in operating activities | (15,423 | ) | (12,149 | ) | |||
Cash flows from investing activities: | |||||||
Purchase of property, equipment, and leasehold improvements | (4,856 | ) | (7,645 | ) | |||
Premiere Credit of North America, LLC cash acquired | — | 2,285 | |||||
Net cash used in investing activities | (4,856 | ) | (5,360 | ) | |||
Cash flows from financing activities: | |||||||
Repayment of notes payable | (2,488 | ) | (2,200 | ) | |||
Debt issuance costs paid | (81 | ) | (27 | ) | |||
Taxes paid related to net share settlement of stock awards | (466 | ) | (663 | ) | |||
Proceeds from exercise of stock options | 34 | 187 | |||||
Borrowings from notes payable | 21,000 | 4,000 | |||||
Net cash provided by financing activities | 17,999 | 1,297 | |||||
Effect of foreign currency exchange rate changes on cash | — | (32 | ) | ||||
Net decrease in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash | (2,280 | ) | (16,244 | ) | |||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of year | 7,275 | 23,519 | |||||
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of year | $ | 4,995 | $ | 7,275 | |||
Reconciliation of the consolidated statements of cash flows to the consolidated balance sheets: | |||||||
Cash and cash equivalents | 3,373 | 5,462 | |||||
F-7
Restricted cash | 1,622 | 1,813 | |||||
Total cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period | 4,995 | 7,275 | |||||
Non-cash investing activities: | |||||||
Recognition of contingent consideration in acquisition | $ | — | $ | 2,154 | |||
Non-cash financing activities: | |||||||
Recognition of shares issued in acquisition | $ | — | $ | 2,420 | |||
Recognition of earnout shares issued | $ | 176 | $ | — | |||
Recognition of warrant issued in debt financing | $ | 1,165 | $ | 249 | |||
Supplemental disclosures of cash flow information: | |||||||
Cash received for income taxes | $ | (202 | ) | $ | (6,228 | ) | |
Cash paid for interest | $ | 6,304 | $ | 3,477 | |||
See accompanying notes to consolidated financial statements.
F-8
PERFORMANT FINANCIAL CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
For the Years Ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
1. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
(a) | Organization and Nature of Business |
Performant Financial Corporation (the "Company" or "we") is a leading provider of technology-enabled recovery and analytics services in the United States. The Company's services help identify, restructure and recover delinquent or defaulted assets and improper payments for both government and private clients in a broad range of markets. Clients of the Company typically operate in complex and regulated environments and contract for their recovery needs in order to reduce losses on defaulted student loans, improper healthcare payments and delinquent state tax and federal treasury receivables. The Company generally provides our services on an outsourced basis; handling many or all aspects of the clients’ recovery processes.
The Company’s consolidated financial statements include the operations of Performant Financial Corporation (Performant), its wholly-owned subsidiaries Premiere Credit of North America, LLC (Premiere) and Performant Business Services, Inc. (PBS), and PBS's wholly-owned subsidiaries Performant Recovery, Inc. (Recovery), Performant Technologies, LLC (PTL), and Performant Europe Ltd (through 2018). Performant is a Delaware corporation headquartered in California and was formed in 2003. Premiere is an Indiana limited liability company acquired by Performant on August 31, 2018. PBS is a Nevada corporation founded in 1997. Recovery is a California corporation founded in 1976. PTL is a California limited liability company that was formed in 2004.
The Company is managed and operated as one business, with a single management team that reports to the Chief Executive Officer.
(b) | Principles of Consolidation |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America, or U.S. GAAP. The Company consolidates entities in which it has controlling financial interest, and as of December 31, 2019, all of the Company’s subsidiaries are 100% owned. All intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
(c) | Use of Estimates in the Preparation of Consolidated Financial Statements |
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP, requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, primarily accounts receivable, intangible assets, goodwill, estimated liability for appeals and disputes, earnout payable, other liabilities, deferred income taxes and income tax expense, and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Our actual results could differ from those estimates.
(d) | Liquidity |
The accompanying consolidated financial statements have been prepared on the basis of going concern which contemplates that the Company will be able to realize assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. Accordingly, they do not give effect to any adjustments that would be necessary should the Company be required to liquidate its assets. The Company incurred net losses of approximately $26.8 million and $8.0 million as well as net cash outflows from operations of approximately $15.4 million and $12.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The ability of the Company to continue to fund its business plans is dependent upon realizing sufficient cash flows in the future. The accompanying consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.
In March 2020, the World Health Organization declared the 2019 coronavirus disease (“COVID-19”) a pandemic. COVID-19 has had, and will likely continue to have, an impact on the Company’s business, both operationally and financially. For example, all states in which the Company has offices are under state of emergency and have shelter-in-place or equivalent orders as of the filing of this Form 10-K, which has resulted in both management and employees working remotely (from home).
F-9
The United States Government has passed multiple new laws designed to help companies respond to the COVID-19 pandemic. Specifically, on March 27, 2020, Congress enacted the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security Act (the “CARES Act”) which included several student loan-related changes. These changes have had an impact on the Company’s financial results and management expects that they will continue to affect the Company’s financial results into the foreseeable future.
The CARES Act included changes to student loans owned by the Department of Education. These changes include the suspension of payments, the ceasing of accruing interest, and stopping involuntary collections of payments (e.g., wage garnishments). The changes are in effect through September 30, 2020. While these changes impact the set-up of new loan rehabilitation agreements by defaulted student loan borrowers, the Department of Education will consider each month during the period of suspended payments as an eligible month towards achieving loan rehabilitation, which is an element in determining future revenue to which the Company is entitled. In addition, student loan revenue and related cash flows will continue during this period because the Company earns revenue for a number of months from existing in-process borrower rehabilitation agreements. Further, while not mandated by the CARES Act, all of the Company’s Guaranty Agency clients (who administer the Federal Family Education Loan Program) are largely complying with the provisions of the Act, with the exception of counting missed payments toward qualification for loan rehabilitation. Given the CARES Act impacts on the Company’s recovery activities through September 30, 2020, the Company has furloughed more than 400 employees to date, which will result in annual savings of more than $15 million.
The Company’s healthcare business has not experienced, and is not currently expected to experience, a similar level of impact as the recovery business due to the fact that only two healthcare customers have been impacted by congressional regulations to date. While a few healthcare customers placed short term pauses on audit activities, the Company has continued to see growth and expansion in other healthcare offerings; notably, the Company’s Third Party Liability contracts have not experienced any contractions to date. Additionally, the Company does not foresee any permanent negative effects to its relationships or overall contract expectations within the healthcare markets.
With respect to favorable impacts to the Company’s liquidity, the CARES Act provided the right to carryback net operating losses from 2018 and 2019 to earlier periods. The Company has already filed for a refund request for the 2013 tax year which will result in an approximately $2.4 million cash refund, and the Company will file a refund request for the 2014 tax year which is expected to result in a refund of approximately $1.5 million. The CARES Act also allows deferrals and credits for payroll tax amounts, which is expected to provide approximately $3 million in cash savings through the remainder of 2020.
The Company continues to analyze the impact of COVID-19. However, the Company believes that its forecasted results, considering the impact of COVID-19, will be sufficient to fund the Company’s current operations, for at least a year from the issuance of these consolidated financial statements. While the Company believes its financial projections are attainable, there can be no assurances that the financial results will be recognized in a timeframe necessary to meet the Company’s ongoing cash requirements.
To address the Company’s liquidity needs, the Company may need to execute various actions to increase cash necessary for operations. These actions include, but are not limited to, additional reductions in workforce (both through furloughs and layoffs), reduce or delay capital expenditures, seek additional capital infusions through public and/or private means, sales of real estate assets or operations, and scaling back of certain lower margin operations.
(e) | Acquisition of Premiere Credit of North America |
On August 31, 2018, the Company completed its acquisition of Premiere from the ECMC Group, Inc. (“ECMC”). Premiere is a leading provider of recovery services to government, student loan and commercial clients with approximately 330 employees located in Indianapolis and Nashville. ECMC is also the lender under our existing credit agreement. The Company funded the acquisition with issuance of 1,000,000 Performant shares to ECMC and additional shares over the five-year period following the closing based on revenue associated with Premiere’s business in each year. At closing, Performant entered into a long-term agreement to be ECMC’s primary student loan recovery vendor.
F-10
Consideration: The consideration for the acquisition was determined as follows (in thousands except per share amount):
Initial shares consideration | 1,000 | ||
Closing stock price per share | $ | 2.42 | |
2,420 | |||
Earn-out consideration | 2,154 | ||
Total consideration | $ | 4,574 | |
The contingent earn-out consideration was valued based on a Monte Carlo simulation.
Purchase price allocation: In accordance with U.S. GAAP, the total purchase price was allocated to the tangible and intangible assets acquired based on management’s estimates of their fair values.
The following table summarizes the estimated fair values of the assets acquired and liabilities (in thousands):
Cash and cash equivalents | $ | 2,285 | |
Trade accounts receivable, net | 1,690 | ||
Other current assets | 576 | ||
Property, equipment, and leasehold improvements, net | 3,174 | ||
Customer relationship intangible asset | 50 | ||
Other assets | 34 | ||
Total identifiable assets acquired | 7,809 | ||
Accounts Payable | (328 | ) | |
Accrued salaries and benefits | (970 | ) | |
Other current liabilities | (1,802 | ) | |
Other liabilities | (135 | ) | |
Net assets acquired | $ | 4,574 | |
The estimated fair value and useful life for the customer relationship intangible asset was $50 thousand and 4 years, respectively.
The fair value of the customer relationship and the amortization method were determined using the excess earnings method that relies on projected future net cash flows including key assumptions for the customer attrition rate and discount rate. The estimated weighted average useful life reflects the time period and pattern that Performant expects for projected benefits.
The Company recorded $0.2 million of acquisition-related costs in other operating expenses.
The results of Premiere have been included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements from the date of acquisition. Revenues from Premiere included in the Company’s results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 were $7.0 million. Net loss for Premiere included in the Company’s results for the twelve months ended December 31, 2018 was $1.4 million.
F-11
Pro forma information: The following table presents selected unaudited pro forma information for the Company assuming the acquisition of Premiere had occurred as of January 1, 2018. This pro forma information does not purport to present what the Company’s actual results would have been if the acquisition occurred as of the date indicated or what such results would be for any future periods.
Year Ended December 31, 2018 | |||
(In thousands, except per share amounts) | |||
Total revenues | $ | 170,893 | |
Net loss | $ | (12,672 | ) |
Earnings per share: | |||
Basic | $ | (0.24 | ) |
Diluted | $ | (0.24 | ) |
(f) | Cash and Cash Equivalents |
Cash and cash equivalents include demand deposits.
The Company collects monies on behalf of its clients. Cash is often held on behalf of the clients in various trust accounts and is subsequently remitted to the clients based on contractual agreements. Cash held in these trust accounts for contracting agencies is not included in the Company’s assets (Note 11(a)).
(g) | Restricted Cash |
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, restricted cash included in current assets on our consolidated balance sheet was $1.6 million and $1.8 million, respectively, held in the form of certificates of deposit, which serve as collateral for letters of credit.
(h) | Property, Equipment, and Leasehold Improvements |
Property, equipment, and leasehold improvements are stated at cost, net of accumulated depreciation. Furniture and equipment are depreciated using the straight-line method over estimated useful lives ranging from 5 to 7 years. Buildings are depreciated using the straight-line method over 31.5 years. Leasehold improvements are amortized using the straight-line method over the shorter of the estimated life of the asset or the remaining term of the lease. Computer software and computer hardware are depreciated using the straight-line method over 3 years and 5 years, respectively.
Maintenance and repairs are charged to expense as incurred. Improvements that extend the useful lives of assets are capitalized.
When property is sold or retired, the cost and the related accumulated depreciation are removed from the consolidated balance sheet and any gain or loss from the transaction is included in the consolidated statements of operations.
(i) | Goodwill and Other Intangible Assets |
Goodwill represents the excess of purchase price and related costs over the fair value assigned to the net assets of businesses acquired. Goodwill is reviewed for impairment annually in December, or more frequently if certain indicators are present. We may first assess qualitative factors for indicators of impairment to determine whether it is necessary to perform the quantitative goodwill impairment test. The Company changed its annual assessment to December in 2019 from November in 2018 since the Company had performed interim quantitative impairment assessments during 2019. The change in the annual assessment date did not have a material impact on our analysis.
F-12
In performing the quantitative goodwill test, if the carrying value of the Company, as one reporting unit, exceeds its fair value, goodwill is considered impaired. The amount of impairment loss is measured as the difference between the carrying value and the fair value of the reporting unit. Impairment testing is based upon the best information available including our market capitalization and estimates of fair value which incorporate assumptions marketplace participants would use in making their estimates of fair value. Significant assumptions and estimates are required, including, but not limited to, projecting future cash flows, determining appropriate discount rates and terminal growth rates, and other assumptions, to estimate the fair value of the reporting unit, inclusive of goodwill. Although the Company believes the assumptions and estimates made are reasonable and appropriate, different assumptions and estimates could materially impact the amount of impairment.
Identifiable intangible assets consist of customer contracts and related relationships. Customer contracts and related relationships are amortized over their estimated useful lives of 4 to 20 years.
(j) | Impairment of Long-Lived Assets |
Long-lived assets are evaluated for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of such assets or intangibles may not be recoverable. Recoverability of assets to be held and used is measured by a comparison of the carrying amount of the assets to future undiscounted net cash flows expected to be generated by the assets. If such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured by the amount by which the carrying amount of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets.
(k) | System Developments |
The Company follows the provisions of Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) Subtopic 350-40, Internal-Use Software, which specifies that costs incurred during the application stage of development should be capitalized. All other costs are expensed as incurred. During 2019 and 2018, costs of $4.0 million and $5.5 million, respectively, were capitalized for projects in the application stage of development. Depreciation expense for completed projects during 2019 and 2018 were $5.8 million and $6.8 million, respectively.
(l) | Debt Issuance Costs |
Debt issuance costs represent loan and legal fees paid in connection with the issuance of long-term debt. Debt issuance costs are deducted from current and non-current notes payable and are amortized to interest expense under the effective interest method in accordance with key terms of the notes as amended.
(m) | Revenues, Accounts Receivable, and Estimated Liability for Appeals |
The Company derives its revenues primarily from providing recovery services and healthcare audit services. Revenues are recognized when control of these services is transferred to its customers, in an amount that reflects the consideration the Company expects to be entitled to in exchange for those services.
The Company determines revenue recognition through the following steps:
•Identification of the contract with a customer
•Identification of the performance obligations in the contract
•Determination of the transaction price
•Allocation of the transaction price to the performance obligations in the contract
•Recognition of revenue when, or as, the performance obligations are satisfied
The Company accounts for a contract when it has approval and commitment from both parties, the rights of the parties are identified, payment terms are identified, the contract has commercial substance and collectability of consideration is probable.
The Company’s contracts generally contain a single performance obligation, delivered over time as a series of services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer to the client, as the promise to transfer the individual services is not separately identifiable from other promises in the contracts and, therefore, not distinct. For contracts with multiple performance obligations, the Company would allocate the contract’s transaction price to each performance obligation using its best estimate of the standalone selling price of each distinct service in the contract. The Company determines the standalone selling prices by taking into consideration the value of the services being provided, the client type and how similar services are priced in other contracts on a standalone basis.
F-13
The Company’s contracts are composed primarily of variable consideration. Fees earned under the Company’s recovery service contracts consist primarily of contingency fees based on a specified percentage of the amount the Company enables its clients to recover. The contingency fee percentage for a particular recovery depends on the type of recovery or claim facilitated. In certain contracts the Company can earn additional performance-based consideration determined based on its performance relative to the client’s other contractors providing similar services.
Revenue from contingency fees earned upon recovery of funds is generally recognized as amounts are invoiced based on either the ‘as-invoiced’ practical expedient when such amounts reflect the value of the services completed to-date, or an output measure based on milestones which is used to measure progress of the satisfaction of its performance obligation. The Company estimates any performance-based variable consideration and recognizes such revenue over the performance period only if it is probable that a significant reversal in the amount of cumulative revenue recognized will not occur. Under certain contracts, consideration can include periodic performance-based bonuses which can be awarded based on the Company’s performance under the specific contract. These performance-based awards are considered variable and may be constrained by the Company until there is not a risk of a material reversal.
For contracts that contain a refund right, these amounts are considered variable consideration and the Company estimates its refund liability for each claim and recognizes revenue net of such estimate.
The Company generally either applies the as-invoiced practical expedient where its right to consideration corresponds directly to its right to invoice its clients, or the variable consideration allocation exception where the variable consideration is attributable to one or more, but not all, of the services promised in a series of distinct services that form part of a single performance obligation. As such the Company has elected the optional exemptions related to the as-invoiced practical expedient and the variable consideration allocation exception whereby the disclosure of the amount of transaction price allocated to the remaining performance obligations is not required.
The Company has applied the as-invoiced practical expedient or the variable consideration allocation exception to contracts with performance obligations that have an average remaining duration of less than a year.
Revenue is recognized upon the collection of defaulted loan and debt payments. Loan rehabilitation revenue is recognized when the rehabilitated loans are sold (funded) by clients. Incentive revenue is recognized upon receipt of official notification of incentive award from customers.
Under the Company’s Medicare Secondary Payer Commercial Payment Center (MSP) contract with Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), the Company recognizes revenues when insurance companies or other responsible parties remit payment to reimburse CMS for claims for which they are responsible, and the remittance has been applied in the CMS database. Under the Company’s Medicare Recovery Audit Contractor (RAC), contract with CMS, the Company recognizes revenues when the healthcare provider has paid CMS for a given claim or has agreed to an offset against other claims by the provider.
For healthcare claims audit contracts with commercial clients, the Company may recognize revenue upon delivering the results of claims audits, when sufficient reliable information is available to the Company for estimating the variable consideration earned, as it is a reasonable measure of the Company’s progress toward complete satisfaction of our performance obligation. For coordination-of-benefits contracts with commercial clients, the Company recognizes revenue when insurance companies or other responsible parties have remitted payments to the client.
Healthcare providers have the right to appeal a claim and may pursue additional appeals if the initial appeal is found in favor of CMS or other healthcare clients under the RAC or other commercial healthcare contracts. Under the MSP contract, insurance companies or other responsible parties may dispute the Company’s findings regarding Medicare not being the primary payer of healthcare claims. Total estimated liability for appeals and disputes was $1.0 million and 0.2 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. This represents the Company’s best estimate of the probable amount of losses related to appeals or disputes of claims for which commissions were previously collected.
For customer care / outsourced services clients, the Company recognizes revenues based on the volume of processed transactions or the quantity of labor hours provided.
F-14
The following table presents revenue disaggregated by category (in thousands) for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Year Ended December 31, | |||||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
(in thousands) | |||||||
Healthcare (1) | $ | 43,328 | $ | 54,454 | |||
Recovery (2) | 89,626 | 83,785 | |||||
Customer Care / Outsourced Services | 17,478 | 17,429 | |||||
Total Revenues | $ | 150,432 | $ | 155,668 | |||
(1) Includes $28.4 million related to the termination of the 2009 CMS Region A contract
(2) Represents student lending, state and municipal tax authorities, IRS and Department of Treasury markets, select financial institutions, as well as Premiere Credit of North America.
For the year ended December 31, 2019, the Company had three clients whose individual revenues exceeded 10% of the Company’s total revenues. The dollar amount and percent of total revenue of each of the three clients are summarized in the table below (in thousands):
Rank | 2019 Revenue | Percent of total revenue | ||
1 | $27,867 | 18.5% | ||
2 | $26,593 | 17.7% | ||
3 | $16,329 | 10.9% | ||
Accounts receivable due from these three customers were 45% of total trade accounts receivable at December 31, 2019, of which two of these customers comprised 24% and 18% of total trade receivables.
For the year ended December 31, 2018, the Company had three clients whose individual revenues exceeded 10% of the Company’s total revenues. The dollar amount and percent of total revenue of each of the three clients are summarized in the table below (in thousands):
Rank | 2018 Revenue | Percent of total revenue | ||
1 | $41,859 | 26.9% | ||
2 | $26,908 | 17.3% | ||
3 | $26,702 | 17.2% | ||
Accounts receivable due from these three customers were 62% of total trade receivables at December 31, 2018.
Trade accounts receivable are recorded at the invoiced amount and do not bear interest. Amounts collected on trade accounts receivable are included in cash used in operating activities in the consolidated statements of cash flows. The Company determines the allowance for doubtful accounts by specific identification. Account balances are charged off against the allowance after all means of collection have been exhausted and the potential for recovery is considered remote. The allowance for doubtful accounts was $0.2 million and $0.02 million for December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively.
The Company determined that it does not have any costs related to obtaining or fulfilling a contract that are recoverable and as such, these contract costs are expensed as incurred
The Company had contract assets of $1.3 million and $0 million as of December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively. The contract assets relate to the Company’s rights to consideration for services completed during the respective years, but not invoiced at the reporting date. The increase in contract assets is primarily due to timing of invoices issued and increased volume of work. Contract assets are recorded to accounts receivable when the rights become unconditional and amounts are invoiced.
F-15
Contract liabilities are included in deferred revenue in the consolidated balance sheets. The Company had contract liabilities of $0.1 million as of December 31, 2019 and $1.1 million as of December 31, 2018. The Company’s contract liability related to an advance recovery commission payment received from a customer during the first quarter of 2018, for which the Company recognized revenue as services were delivered.
(n) | Prepaid Expenses and Other Current Assets |
At December 31, 2019, prepaid expenses and other current assets were $3.3 million and included approximately $2.2 million related to prepaid software licenses and maintenance agreements, $0.7 million for prepaid insurance, and $0.4 million for various other prepaid expenses. At December 31, 2018, prepaid expenses and other current assets were $3.4 million and included approximately $2.1 million related to prepaid software licenses and maintenance agreements, $0.7 million for prepaid insurance, and $0.6 million for various other prepaid expenses.
(o) | Legal Expenses |
The Company recognizes legal fees related to litigation as they are incurred.
(p) | Comprehensive Loss |
The Company had a single component of comprehensive loss on the consolidated statements of comprehensive loss related to foreign currency translation adjustments for its subsidiary Performant Europe Ltd. for the year ended December 31, 2018.
(q) | Fair Value of Financial Instruments |
The Company’s consolidated financial instruments include cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, short-term debt and long-term debt. The carrying values of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, accounts payable, and accrued liabilities approximate their fair values based on or due to their short-term maturities. The carrying values of short-term debt and long-term debt approximate fair value, in which their variable interest rates approximate market rates.
(r) | Income Taxes |
The Company accounts for income taxes under the asset-and-liability method. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are recognized for future tax consequences attributable to differences between the carrying value of assets and liabilities for financial reporting purposes and for taxation purposes. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are measured using the enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred income tax assets and liabilities is recognized in income in the period that includes the enactment date. Valuation allowances are established when necessary to reduce deferred tax assets to the amount expected to be realized.
The Company recognizes the effect of income tax positions only if those positions are more likely than not of being sustained. Recognized income tax positions are measured at the largest amount that is greater than 50% likely of being realized. Changes in recognition or measurement are reflected in the period in which the change in judgment occurs. Interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits are recorded in income tax expense.
(s) | Stock-based Compensation |
The Company accounts for its employee stock-based compensation awards in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation. FASB ASC Topic 718 requires that all employee stock-based compensation is recognized as a cost in the consolidated financial statements and that for equity-classified awards, such cost is measured at the grant date fair value of the award.
FASB ASC Topic 718 also requires that excess tax benefits recognized in equity related to stock option exercises are reflected as financing cash inflows. There was no income tax benefit resulting from the exercise of stock options in both 2019 and 2018.
F-16
(t) | Loss per Share |
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, basic loss per share is calculated by dividing net loss attributable to common shareholders by the sum of the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the year. Diluted earnings per share is calculated by dividing net income available to common shareholders by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common shares equivalents outstanding during the period. The Company’s common share equivalents consist of stock options, restricted stock units (RSUs), and performance stock units. When there is a loss in the period, dilutive common share equivalents are excluded from the calculation of diluted earnings per share, as their effect would be anti-dilutive.
The following table reconciles the basic to diluted weighted average shares outstanding using the treasury stock method (shares in thousands):
Years Ended December 31, | |||||
2019 | 2018 | ||||
Weighted average shares outstanding – basic | 53,468 | 52,064 | |||
Dilutive effect of stock options | — | — | |||
Weighted average shares outstanding – diluted | 53,468 | 52,064 | |||
(u) | New Accounting Pronouncements |
Recently Adopted Accounting Standards
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “Leases”, which requires the recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet by lessees for those leases currently classified as operating leases under ASC Topic 840 Leases. The guidance is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2019 and should be applied using a modified retrospective approach. In July 2018, the FASB issued ASU No. 2018-11, Targeted Improvements, which provide the option to apply the new leasing standard to all open leases as of the adoption date. The Company elected to adopt this pronouncement on January 1, 2019 using the optional transition method under ASU 2018-11 and elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance, which permits the Company not to reassess under the new standard prior conclusions about lease identification, lease classification and initial direct costs. The Company also elected to combine lease and non-lease components, and to apply the short-term lease exception.
As a result of implementing this guidance, the Company recognized $10.4 million of right of use (ROU) assets and $11.6 million of lease liabilities for its operating leases, including a reclassification of deferred rent of $1.2 million, on its consolidated balance sheet as of January 1, 2019.
The adoption did not impact the consolidated statements of operations, nor will it have an impact on the Company’s liquidity. The standard will also have no impact on the Company’s debt-covenant compliance under its current agreement. Results and disclosure requirements for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2019 are presented under Topic 842, while prior period amounts have not been adjusted and continue to be reported in accordance with historical accounting under Topic 840.
Under Topic 842, ROU assets represent the Company’s right to use an underlying asset for the lease term, and lease liabilities represent the Company’s obligation to make lease payments arising from the lease. We determine if an arrangement is a lease at inception. ROU assets and liabilities are recognized at commencement date based on the present value of remaining lease payments over the lease term. As the implied discount rate in most of our leases is indeterminable, we use our incremental borrowing rate based on the information available at commencement date in determining the present value of lease payments. Our incremental borrowing rate is a hypothetical rate based on our understanding of what our credit rating would be. The ROU asset also includes any lease payments made prior to commencement and is recorded net of any lease incentives received. Our lease terms may include options to extend or terminate the lease when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise such options.
In March 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-04, "Intangibles-Goodwill and Other: Simplifying the Test for Goodwill Impairment" which eliminates the second step from the goodwill impairment test. An entity should perform its goodwill impairment test by comparing the fair value of a reporting unit with its carrying amount. An entity will recognize an impairment charge for the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the reporting unit’s fair value, but the loss cannot exceed the total amount of goodwill allocated to the reporting unit. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted.
F-17
The Company early adopted this standard for the year ended December 31, 2018 on a prospective basis. There was no impact on the Company's financial position or results of operations upon adoption of this standard
Relevant New Accounting Standards
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12, "Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes". This ASU clarifies and simplifies accounting for income taxes by eliminating certain exceptions for intraperiod tax allocation principles and the methodology for calculating income tax rates in an interim period, among other updates. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2020, with early adoption permitted. The Company is evaluating the effect of the adoption of this pronouncement.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13, "Fair Value Measurements", which eliminates, adds or modifies certain disclosure requirements for fair value measurements. Entities will no longer be required to disclose the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy, but will be required to disclose the range and weighted average used to develop significant unobservable inputs for Level 3 fair value measurements. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within that fiscal year, with early adoption permitted to adopt either the entire standard or only the provisions that eliminate or modify the requirements. The Company is evaluating the effect of the adoption of this pronouncement.
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-13, "Financial Instruments - Credit Losses: Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments" as modified by subsequently issued ASU's 2018-19, 2019-04, 2019-05 and 2019-11. This ASU requires estimating all expected credit losses for certain types of financial instruments, including trade receivables, held at the reporting date based on historical experience, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. This ASU is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. The Company will adopt this ASU effective January 1, 2020. The Company is evaluating the effect of the adoption of this pronouncement.
2. Property, Equipment, and Leasehold Improvements
Property, equipment, and leasehold improvements consist of the following at December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
December 31, 2019 | December 31, 2018 | ||||||
Land | $ | 1,943 | $ | 1,943 | |||
Building and leasehold improvements | 8,124 | 8,076 | |||||
Furniture and equipment | 6,257 | 6,248 | |||||
Computer hardware and software | 79,066 | 78,743 | |||||
95,390 | 95,010 | ||||||
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization | (76,621 | ) | (72,755 | ) | |||
Property, equipment and leasehold improvements, net | $ | 18,769 | $ | 22,255 | |||
Depreciation and amortization expense of property, equipment and leasehold improvements was $8.3 million and $9.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
3. Identifiable Intangible Assets and Goodwill
Identifiable intangible assets consist of the following at December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
December 31, 2019 | Gross Amounts | Accumulated Amortization | Net | ||||||||
Customer contracts and related relationships | $ | 25,740 | $ | (24,815 | ) | $ | 925 | ||||
Perpetual license | 3,250 | (3,250 | ) | — | |||||||
Total amortizable intangible assets | $ | 28,990 | $ | (28,065 | ) | $ | 925 | ||||
F-18
December 31, 2018 | Gross Amounts | Accumulated Amortization | Net | ||||||||
Customer contracts and related relationships | $ | 25,378 | $ | (24,264 | ) | $ | 1,114 | ||||
Less: Impairment of customer contracts and related relationships | (2,988 | ) | 2,988 | — | |||||||
Add: Customer relationship intangible asset | 50 | (4 | ) | $ | 46 | ||||||
Perpetual license | 3,250 | (3,250 | ) | — | |||||||
Total amortizable intangible assets | $ | 25,690 | $ | (24,530 | ) | $ | 1,160 | ||||
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, amortization expense related to intangible assets amounted to $0.2 million and $0.8 million, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2018, an impairment expense of $3.0 million was recognized relating to the Great Lakes Higher Education Guaranty Corporation customer relationship and was presented as a separate caption in the consolidated statements of operations. The amortization expense for each of the next four fiscal years is approximately $0.2 million each year.
The carrying amount of goodwill was $74.4 million and $81.6 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. During the fourth quarter of 2019, the Company identified an impairment indicator associated with the sustained decrease in its market capitalization and performed impairment tests on goodwill. The determination of our reporting unit’s fair value involved, among other things, the Company’s market capitalization and application of the income approach. We concluded that the carrying value of our reporting unit was greater than the fair value, which resulted in a non-cash goodwill impairment charge of $7.2 million. The goodwill impairment charge had no impact on the Company’s cash flows or compliance with debt covenants.
4. Credit Agreement
On August 7, 2017, we, through our wholly-owned subsidiary Performant Business Services, Inc. (the "Borrower"), entered into a credit agreement (as amended, the “Credit Agreement”) with ECMC Group, Inc. Before the amendment described below, the Credit Agreement provided for a term loan facility in the initial amount of $44 million (the “Initial Term Loan”) and for up to $15 million of additional term loans (“Additional Term Loans” and together with the Initial Term Loan, the “Loans”) which original Additional Term Loans were initially able to be drawn until the second anniversary of the funding of the Initial Term Loans, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions. On August 11, 2017, the Initial Term Loan was advanced (the "Closing Date") and the proceeds were applied to repay all outstanding amounts under our prior credit agreement with Madison Capital Funding LLC as administrative agent ("the Prior Credit Agreement"). On August 31, 2018, we entered into Amendment No. 2 to the Credit Agreement to among other things (i) extend the maturity date of the Initial Term Loan and any Additional Term Loans by one year to August 2021, (ii) expand the Additional Term Loans commitment from $15 million to $25 million, (iii) extend the period during which Additional Term Loans can be borrowed by one year to August 2020, and (iv) relieve the Borrower from its obligation to comply with the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement during the six fiscal quarters following the Premiere acquisition.
On October 15, 2018, the Company borrowed $4 million of the $25 million available as Additional Term Loans under the Credit Agreement. On March 21, 2019, we entered into Amendment No. 3 to the Credit Agreement to among other things relieve the Borrower from its obligation to comply with the financial covenants in the Credit Agreement during the six fiscal quarters following the beginning of the Company’s fourth fiscal quarter of 2018. On April 5, 2019 and May 15, 2019, the Company borrowed $5 million and $6 million, respectively. On August 6, 2019 and September 25, 2019, the Company borrowed $5 million and $5 million, respectively. The Company has borrowed all of the $25 million available as Additional Term Loans.
As of December 31, 2019, $64.3 million was outstanding under the Credit Agreement.
We have the option to extend the maturity of the Loans for two additional one-year periods, subject to the satisfaction of customary conditions. The Loans bear interest at the one-month LIBOR rate (subject to a 1% per annum floor) plus a margin which may vary from 5.5% per annum to 10.0% per annum based on our total debt to EBITDA ratio. Our annual interest rate at December 31, 2019 was 11.8% and 8.0% at December 31, 2018. We are required to pay 5% of the original principal balance of the Loans annually in quarterly installments and to make mandatory prepayments of the Loans with a percentage of our excess cash flow which may vary between 75% and 0% depending on our total debt to EBITDA ratio and from the net cash proceeds of certain asset dispositions and debt not otherwise permitted under the Credit Agreement, in each case, subject to the lender's right to decline to receive such payments.
F-19
The Credit Agreement contains certain restrictive financial covenants which are not effective until the quarter ending June 30, 2020, at which point, we will be required to (1) achieve a minimum fixed charge coverage ratio of 1.0 to 1.0 through December 31, 2020 and 1.25 to 1.0 through June 30, 2022 if the maturity date of the Loans is extended until the fifth anniversary of the Closing Date and (2) maintain a maximum total debt to EBITDA ratio of 6.00 to 1.00. The Credit Agreement also contains covenants that restrict the Company's and its subsidiaries’ ability to incur certain types or amounts of indebtedness, incur liens on certain assets, make material changes in corporate structure or the nature of its business, dispose of material assets, engage in a change in control transaction, make certain foreign investments, enter into certain restrictive agreements, or engage in certain transactions with affiliates. The Credit Agreement also contains various customary events of default, including with respect to change of control of the Company or its ownership of the Borrower.
The obligations under the Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of our subsidiaries' assets and are guaranteed by the Company and its subsidiaries, other than the Borrower.
In consideration for, and concurrently with, the origination of the Initial Term Loan in accordance with the terms of the Credit Agreement, we issued a warrant to the lender to purchase up to an aggregate of 3,863,326 shares of the Company’s common stock (representing approximately up to 7.5% of our diluted common stock as calculated using the “treasury stock” method as defined under U.S. GAAP for the three month period ended June 30, 2017) with an exercise price of $1.92 per share (the "Exercise Price").
Upon borrowing of the Additional Term Loans, the Company was required to issue additional warrants at the same Exercise Price to purchase up to an aggregate of 77,267 additional shares of common stock (which represents approximately 0.15% of our diluted common stock calculated using the “treasury stock” method as defined under U.S. GAAP for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2017) for each $1.0 million of such Additional Term Loans. Similarly, upon our election to extend the maturity of the loans for two additional one year periods, we will be required to issue additional warrants at the same Exercise Price to purchase up to an aggregate of 515,110 additional shares of common stock for the first year, and to purchase up to an aggregate of 772,665 additional shares of common stock for the second year (which represent approximately 1.0% and 1.5% of our diluted common stock for the first and second years, respectively, calculated using the “treasury stock” method as defined under U.S. GAAP for the fiscal quarter ended June 30, 2017).
The Company has accounted for these warrants as equity instruments since the warrants are indexed to the Company’s common shares and meet the criteria for classification in shareholders’ equity. The relative fair values of the warrants are noted below and were treated as a discount to the associated debt. These amounts are being amortized to interest expense under the effective interest method over the life of the Term Loan and Additional Term Loans, respectively, which is a period of 48 months. The Company estimated the value of the warrants using the Black-Scholes model. The key information and assumptions used to value the warrants are as follows:
August 2017 Issuance | October 2018 Issuance | April 2019 Issuance | May 2019 Issuance | August 2019 Issuance | September 2019 Issuance | |
Exercise price | $1.92 | $1.92 | $1.92 | $1.92 | $1.92 | $1.92 |
Share price on date of issuance | $1.85 | $1.93 | $2.24 | $1.75 | $1.11 | $1.10 |
Volatility | 50.0% | 55.0% | 57.5% | 57.5% | 67.5% | 67.5% |
Risk-free interest rate | 1.83% | 3.01% | 2.31% | 2.15% | 1.53% | 1.60% |
Expected dividend yield | —% | —% | —% | —% | —% | —% |
Contractual term (in years) | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 5 |
Number of shares | 3,863,326 | 309,066 | 386,333 | 463,599 | 386,333 | 386,333 |
Relative fair value of each warrant | $3.3 million | $0.2 million | $0.4 million | $0.4 million | $0.2 million | $0.2 million |
In addition, at the closing of the Initial Term Loan, the Company paid transaction costs of $0.6 million, which were recorded as a discount on the debt and are being amortized to interest expense using the effective interest method over the life of the Initial Term Loan, which is a period of 48 months.
F-20
Outstanding debt obligations are as follows (in thousands):
December 31, 2019 | |||
Principal amount | $ | 64,313 | |
Less: unamortized discount and debt issuance costs | (2,431 | ) | |
Notes payable less unamortized discount and debt issuance costs | 61,882 | ||
Less: current maturities, net of unamortized discount and debt issuance costs | (3,320 | ) | |
Long-term notes payable, net of current maturities and unamortized discount and debt issuance costs | $ | 58,562 | |
5. Related Party Transactions
As discussed in Note 1(d), in August of 2018, the Company purchased Premiere from ECMC, with the purchase consideration including the issuance of 1,000,000 shares of Company common stock to ECMC and a commitment to issue ECMC additional shares of common stock as part of an earn-out agreement. Additionally, as discussed in Note 4, since August 2017, ECMC has served as a lender to the Company with a Credit Agreement initially funded in August 2017 at $44 million, and a balance outstanding of $64.3 and $45.8 million as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. In connection with the Credit Agreement, the Company has issued ECMC warrants to purchase 5,794,990 and 4,172,392 shares of common stock through December 31, 2019 and 2018 respectively. ECMC’s beneficial ownership percentage on each of these dates was approximately 11.7% and 9.0%, respectively. The Company has a relationship with ECMC as a customer, with revenues of $16.3 million in 2019 and $15.5 million in 2018. Given the breadth of ECMC’s involvement with the Company as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, we have concluded that ECMC is a related party for purposes of financial statement presentation and disclosure.
F-21
6. Leases
The Company has entered into various non-cancelable operating lease agreements for office facilities and equipment with original lease periods expiring between 2020 and 2025. Certain of these arrangements have free rent periods and/or escalating rent payment provisions. As such, we recognize rent expense under such arrangements on a straight-line basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Some leases include options to renew. We do not assume renewals in our determination of the lease term unless the renewals are deemed to be reasonably assured at lease commencement. Our lease agreements do not contain any material residual value guarantees or material restrictive covenants. Leases with an initial term of twelve months or less are not recorded on the balance sheet.
In November 2019, the Company amended its lease agreement for the office space in Sunrise, Florida, to reduce the amount of rentable square footage. The lease modification was accounted for as a partial termination whereby the lease liability was re-measured and the ROU asset was reduced on a proportionate basis. The difference between the proportionate reduction in the ROU asset and corresponding lease liability was immaterial and recognized in the consolidated statement of operations as a gain on the effective date of the modification.
Operating lease expense was $3.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2019.
Supplemental cash flow and other information related to operating leases as of December 31, 2019 are as follows:
Weighted Average Remaining Lease Term | 3.4 | years | |
Weighted Average Discount Rate | 6.3 | % | |
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities was $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2019, included in operating cash flows.
The following is a schedule, by years, of maturities of lease liabilities as of December 31, 2019 (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31, | Amount | ||
2020 | $ | 3,192 | |
2021 | 2,306 | ||
2022 | 1,684 | ||
2023 | 563 | ||
Thereafter | 975 | ||
Total undiscounted cash flows | $ | 8,720 | |
Less imputed interest | (961 | ) | |
Total | $ | 7,759 | |
F-22
Disclosures related to periods prior to adoption of the new lease standard
Future minimum rental commitments under non-cancelable leases as of December 31, 2018 were as follows (in thousands):
Year Ending December 31, | Amount | ||
2020 | $ | 3,427 | |
2021 | 3,393 | ||
2022 | 2,514 | ||
2023 | 1,901 | ||
2024 | 800 | ||
Thereafter | 1,390 | ||
Total | $ | 13,425 | |
Lease expense was $3.9 million for the year ended December 31, 2018. Deferred rent included in other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets as of December 31, 2018 was $1.2 million.
7. Capital Stock
Since August 15, 2012, the authorized common stock has been 500,000,000 shares and the authorized preferred stock has been 50,000,000 shares.
8. | Stock-based Compensation |
(a) | Stock Options |
Under the terms of the Performant Financial Corporation 2007 Stock Option Plan (2007 Plan), incentive and nonqualified stock options may be granted for up to 4,000,000 shares of the Company’s authorized but unissued common stock. Options granted under the 2007 Plan generally vest over a five-year period. The 2007 Plan was terminated on the completion of its initial public offering in August 2012. No shares of the Company's common stock are available under our 2007 Plan other than for satisfying exercises of stock options granted under this plan prior to termination.
The terms of the Performant Financial Corporation 2012 Stock Incentive Plan (2012 Plan) provide for the granting of incentive stock options within the meaning of Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code (the Code) to employees and the granting of nonstatutory stock options, restricted stock, stock appreciation rights, stock unit awards and cash-based awards to employees, non-employee directors and consultants. The Company has reserved 10,550,000 shares of common stock under the 2012 Plan. Options granted under the 2012 Plan generally vest over four years.
The exercise price of incentive stock options shall generally not be less than 100% of the fair market value of the common stock subject to the option on the date that the option is granted. The exercise price of nonqualified stock options shall generally not be less than 85% of the fair market value of the common stock subject to the option on the date that the option is granted. Options issued under the two plans have a maximum term of 10 years and vest over schedules determined by the Company's Board of Directors.
F-23
Total stock-based compensation expense charged as salaries and benefits expense in the consolidated statements of operations was $2.3 million and $2.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. The following table sets forth a summary of the Company's stock option activity for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Outstanding Options | Weighted average exercise price per share | Weighted average remaining contractual life (Years) | Aggregate Intrinsic Value (in thousands) | |||||||||
Outstanding at January 01, 2018 | 2,936,198 | 8.21 | 4.48 | |||||||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||||||
Forfeited | (208,346 | ) | 8.96 | |||||||||
Exercised | (268,750 | ) | 0.69 | |||||||||
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 | 2,459,102 | 8.97 | 3.25 | $ | 273 | |||||||
Granted | — | — | ||||||||||
Forfeited | (448,458 | ) | 4.46 | |||||||||
Exercised | (19,478 | ) | 1.74 | |||||||||
Outstanding December 31, 2019 | 1,991,166 | $ | 10.06 | 2.89 | $ | — | ||||||
Vested, exercisable, and expected to vest (1) at December 31, 2019 | 1,991,145 | $ | 10.06 | 2.89 | $ | — | ||||||
Exercisable at December 31, 2019 | 1,990,749 | $ | 10.06 | 2.89 | $ | — | ||||||
(1) Options expected to vest reflect an estimated forfeiture rate.
There were no stock options granted during the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018. The aggregate intrinsic value of our stock options (the amount by which the market price of the stock on the date of exercise exceeded the exercise price of the option) exercised during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $0.0 million and $0.5 million, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, there were $0.0 million and $0.01 million, respectively, of unrecognized stock-based compensation expense related to non-vested stock-based compensation arrangements.
Net cash proceeds from the exercise of stock options were $0.03 million and $0.2 million during 2019 and 2018, respectively.
If stock options had been granted during the years ended December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018, the fair value of each option grant would have been estimated using the Black-Scholes-Merton option pricing model. Expected volatilities are calculated based on the historical volatility data of the Company over a term comparable to the expected term of the options issued. The expected term of the award is determined based on the average of the vesting term and the contractual term. Management monitors share option exercise and employee termination patterns to estimate forfeiture rates within the valuation model.
F-24
(b) | Restricted Stock Units |
The following table summarizes restricted stock unit activity for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Weighted | ||||||
average | ||||||
Number of | grant date | |||||
Awards | fair value | |||||
Outstanding at January 01, 2018 | 2,591,587 | $ | 2.39 | |||
Granted | 2,106,536 | 2.70 | ||||
Forfeited | (871,184 | ) | 2.37 | |||
Vested and converted to shares, net of units withheld for taxes | (645,560 | ) | 2.80 | |||
Units withheld for taxes | (248,143 | ) | $ | 2.80 | ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2018 | 2,933,236 | $ | 2.50 | |||
Granted | 1,660,304 | 1.70 | ||||
Forfeited | (365,225 | ) | 2.40 | |||
Vested and converted to shares, net of units withheld for taxes | (695,709 | ) | 2.43 | |||
Units withheld for taxes | (278,352 | ) | $ | 2.43 | ||
Outstanding at December 31, 2019 | 3,254,254 | $ | 2.12 | |||
Expected to vest at December 31, 2019 | 2,869,744 | $ | 2.12 | |||
Share-based compensation cost for restricted stock units (RSUs) is measured based on the closing fair market value of the Company's common stock on the date of grant. The Company recognizes share-based compensation cost over the award's requisite service period on a straight-line basis for time-based RSUs and on a graded basis for RSUs that are contingent on the achievement of performance conditions.
The majority of RSUs that vested in 2019 and 2018 were net-share settled such that the Company withheld shares with value equivalent to the employees’ minimum statutory obligation for the applicable income and other employment taxes and remitted the cash to the appropriate taxing authorities. The total shares withheld were approximately 278,000 shares for 2019 and approximately 248,000 shares for 2018 and were based on the value of the RSUs on their respective vesting dates as determined by the Company’s closing stock price. These net-share settlements had the effect of share repurchases by the Company as they reduced the number of shares that would have otherwise been issued as a result of the vesting and did not represent an expense to the Company.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, there was$4.6 million and $5.4 million and of compensation expense yet to be recognized related to non-vested restricted stock units. The unrecognized expense as of December 31, 2019 is expected to be recognized over the remaining weighted-average vesting period of 2.5 years. 974,061 and 893,703 of the restricted stock units vested during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. Restricted stock units granted under the 2012 Plan generally vest over periods between one and four years.
9. Employee Benefit Plan
The Company has a 401(k) Salary Deferral Plan (the Plan) covering all full-time employees who have met certain service requirements. Employees may contribute a portion of their salary up to the maximum limit established by the Code for such plans. Employer contributions are discretionary. No matching contributions were made during 2019 and 2018.
F-25
10. Income Taxes
The Company’s income tax expense (benefit) consists of the following (in thousands):
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Current: | |||||||
Federal | $ | — | $ | 275 | |||
State | (390 | ) | 777 | ||||
(390 | ) | 1,052 | |||||
Deferred: | |||||||
Federal | $ | — | $ | (52 | ) | ||
State | 13 | 542 | |||||
13 | 490 | ||||||
Total expense (benefit) | $ | (377 | ) | $ | 1,542 | ||
The reconciliation between the amount computed by applying the U.S. federal statutory rate of 21% for 2019 and 2018 to income before taxes and the Company's tax provision for 2019 and 2018 is as follows:
2019 | 2018 | ||||
Federal income at the statutory rate | 21 | % | 21 | % | |
State income tax, net of federal benefit | 2 | % | (18 | )% | |
Permanent differences | (1 | )% | (4 | )% | |
Work Opportunity Credit | 1 | % | — | % | |
Return to provision true-up | 2 | % | (4 | )% | |
Valuation allowance | (21 | )% | (18 | )% | |
Other | (2 | )% | — | % | |
Effective tax rate | 2 | % | (23 | )% | |
F-26
The following table summarized the components of the Company's deferred tax assets and liabilities as of December 31, 2019 and 2018 (in thousands):
2019 | 2018 | ||||||
Deferred tax assets | |||||||
Vacation accrual | 514 | 551 | |||||
Nonqualified stock options | 2,873 | 3,361 | |||||
State tax deferral | 387 | 502 | |||||
State tax credits | 452 | 452 | |||||
Net operating loss | 4,519 | 3,876 | |||||
Interest expense limitation | 3,419 | 1,498 | |||||
Lease liability | 2,098 | — | |||||
Other | 1,291 | 861 | |||||
Total deferred tax assets | 15,553 | 11,101 | |||||
Valuation allowance | (12,809 | ) | (8,397 | ) | |||
Total deferred tax assets net of valuation allowance | 2,744 | 2,704 | |||||
Deferred tax liabilities: | |||||||
Fixed assets | (749 | ) | (2,692 | ) | |||
Right of use asset | (1,848 | ) | — | ||||
Other | (182 | ) | (34 | ) | |||
Total deferred tax liabilities | (2,779 | ) | (2,726 | ) | |||
Net deferred tax liabilities | $ | (35 | ) | $ | (22 | ) | |
As of December 31, 2019, and 2018, the Company recorded a valuation allowance against deferred tax assets that are not more likely than not realizable based upon the assessment of all positive and negative evidence. The total amount of the valuation allowance at December 31, 2019 is $12.8 million, which is an increase of $4.4 million from the amount recorded as of December 31, 2018.
On December 22, 2017, President Trump signed into law the “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act” (TCJA) that significantly reforms the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. The TCJA, among other things, includes changes to U.S. federal tax rates, imposes significant additional limitations on the deductibility of interest, allows for the expensing of capital expenditures, and puts into effect the migration from a “worldwide” system of taxation to a territorial system. The Company calculated year end income tax provision in accordance with the Tax Act.
In assessing the realizability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible. Management considers the reversal of deferred tax liabilities (including the impact of available carryback and carryforward periods), projected future taxable income and tax-planning strategies in making this assessment. Based upon the Company’s cumulative three year loss position and projections for future taxable income over the periods in which the deferred tax assets are deductible, management believes it is more likely than not that the Company will be unable to realize the benefits of these deductible differences. The amount of the deferred tax asset considered realizable, however, could change in the near term if estimates of future taxable income during the carryforward period change.
The Company has state tax credits of $0.5 million, which will expire in 2024. The Company has state net operating loss carryforwards of $26.0 million which will start to expire in 2020 and a federal net operating loss carryforward of $12.1 million which will be carried forward indefinitely. The Company has $0.5 million of federal tax credit carryforwards which begin to expire in 2037.
F-27
The following table reconciles the Company’s unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2019 from its unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2018 (in thousands):
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at January 1, 2018 | $ | 1,082 | |
Increase related to prior year tax positions | 602 | ||
Lapse of statute of limitations | (83 | ) | |
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2018 | 1,601 | ||
Increase related to prior year tax positions | 51 | ||
Lapse of statute of limitations | (282 | ) | |
Unrecognized tax benefits balance at December 31, 2019 | $ | 1,370 | |
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the Company had approximately $1.4 million and $1.6 million of unrecognized tax benefits, respectively. The Company does not expect any significant change in unrecognized tax benefits during the next twelve months. The Company records interest expense and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in income tax expense. The amount of accrued interest was $0.3 million and $0.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. No penalties were recognized in 2019 or accrued at December 31, 2019, and 2018 respectively. The Company has unrecognized tax benefits of approximately $1.4 million which, if recognized, would favorably affect the Company’s effective income tax rate.
The Company files income tax returns with the U.S. federal government and various state jurisdictions. The Company operates in a number of state and local jurisdictions, most of which have never audited the Company's records. Accordingly, the Company is subject to state and local income tax examinations based upon the various statutes of limitations in each jurisdiction. For tax years before 2016, the Company is no longer subject to Federal and certain other state tax examinations. The company is currently being examined by the Franchise Tax Board of California for tax years 2011 through 2014 and by the Internal Revenue Service for tax year 2017.
11. Other Commitments and Contingencies
(a) | Trust Funds |
The Company collects principal and interest payments and collection costs on defaulted loans for various contracting agencies. Cash collections for some of the Company’s customers are held in trust in bank accounts controlled by the Company. The Company remits trust funds to the contracting agencies on a regular basis. The amount of cash held in trust and the related liability are separated from and not included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements. Cash held in trust for customers totaled $4.3 million and $3.2 million at December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.
(b) | Litigation |
The Company, during the ordinary course of its operations, has been named in various legal suits and claims, several of which are still pending. In the opinion of management and the Company’s legal counsel, such legal actions will not have a material effect on the Company’s consolidated financial position or results of operations or cash flows.
12. Subsequent Events
The Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date these consolidated financial statements were issued and identified the following events, which do not require adjustments to the consolidated financial statements. The related disclosures are included below and in note 1(d).
(a) | COVID-19 Pandemic |
On March 11, 2020, the World Health Organization declared the COVID-19 outbreak a pandemic. The pandemic has had a significant negative impact on global economic conditions. There is significant uncertainty around the breadth and duration of business disruptions related to the COVID-19 pandemic, as well as its impact on the U.S. economy. Management is actively monitoring the situation and adjusting operations as needed. Refer also to Note 1(d).
F-28
(b) Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act
On March 27, 2020, the CARES Act was enacted. The CARES Act is an approximately $2 trillion emergency economic stimulus package that includes spending and tax breaks to strengthen the United States economy and curtail the negative economic effect of the COVID-19 pandemic. The CARES Act provides sweeping tax changes of which the Company can utilize at least two of the provisions: net operating losses arising in 2018, 2019, and 2020 taxable years may be carried back to each of the preceding five years to generate a refund: and deferral of the payment of the employer portion of social security taxes incurred between March 27 and December 31, 2020. Half of the deferred amount is due December 31, 2021 with the other half due December 31, 2022. Refer also to Note 1(d). Management will continue to analyze the different aspects of the CARES Act to determine whether any other provisions may support the Company.
F-29
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PERFORMANT FINANCIAL CORPORATION | |
By: | /s/ Lisa C. Im |
Lisa C. Im | |
Chief Executive Officer | |
Date: April 29, 2020
POWER OF ATTORNEY
KNOW ALL PERSONS BY THESE PRESENTS, that each person whose signature appears below constitutes and appoints Lisa C. Im and Ian Johnston, and each of them, his or her true and lawful attorneys-in-fact, each with full power of substitution, for him or her in any and all capacities, to sign any amendments to this report on Form 10-K and to file the same, with exhibits thereto and other documents in connection therewith, with the Securities and Exchange Commission, hereby ratifying and confirming all that each of said attorneys-in-fact or their substitute or substitutes may do or cause to be done by virtue hereof.
Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.
Name | Title | Date | ||
/s/ Lisa C. Im | Chief Executive Officer (Principal Executive Officer) and Board Chair | April 29, 2020 | ||
Lisa C. Im | ||||
/s/ Ian Johnston | Vice President and Chief Accounting Officer (Principal Financial Officer) | April 29, 2020 | ||
Ian Johnston | ||||
/s/ James LaCamp | Director | April 29, 2020 | ||
James LaCamp | ||||
/s/ Bradley M. Fluegel | Director | April 29, 2020 | ||
Bradley M. Fluegel | ||||
/s/ William D. Hansen | Director | April 29, 2020 | ||
William D. Hansen | ||||
SCHEDULE II – VALUATION AND QUALIFYING ACCOUNTS
For the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018
Allowance for doubtful accounts (in thousands):
Description | Balance at Beginning of Period | Additions Charged against Expense | Recoveries | Charge-offs | Balance at End of Period | |||||||||||
2019 | $ | 22 | 219 | — | (4 | ) | $ | 237 | ||||||||
2018 | $ | 35 | 22 | — | (35 | ) | $ | 22 | ||||||||
Estimated allowance and liability for appeals and disputes (in thousands):
Description | Balance at Beginning of Period | Additions Charged against Revenue | Appeals Found in Providers Favor | Balance at End of Period | ||||||||||
2019 | $ | 210 | 1,032 | (224 | ) | $ | 1,018 | |||||||
2018 | $ | 18,817 | 441 | (19,048 | ) | * | $ | 210 | ||||||
*Includes the release of $18.5 million related to the January 31, 2018 termination of the CMS Region A RAC contract.
Deferred tax asset valuation allowance (in thousands):
Description | Balance at Beginning of Period | Additions | Releases | Balance at End of Period | |||||||||
2019 | $ | 8,397 | 4,412 | — | $ | 12,809 | |||||||
2018 | $ | 5,772 | 2,625 | — | $ | 8,397 | |||||||