PetVivo Holdings, Inc. - Annual Report: 2016 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from ____________ to ____________

Commission File Number: 333-173569

(612) 296-7305

(Registrant's Telephone Number, Including Area Code)

Securities registered under Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered under Section 12(g) of the Act:

Indicate by check mark if registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. o Yes   x No

Indicate by check mark if registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. o Yes   x No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. x Yes   o No

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§ 229.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files). x Yes   o No

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant's knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K. x

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated file, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of "large accelerated filer," "accelerated filer" and "smaller reporting company" in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act). o Yes   x No

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant's most recently completed second fiscal quarter. As of September 30, 2015, approximately $27,678,157.20.

As of August 11, 2016, there were 8,991,306 shares of the issuer's $.001 par value common stock issued and outstanding.

Documents incorporated by reference. There are no annual reports to security holders, proxy information statements, or any prospectus filed pursuant to Rule 424 of the Securities Act of 1933 incorporated herein by reference.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

PART I

Forward-Looking Information

This Annual Report of PetVivo Holdings, Inc. on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, particularly those identified with the words, "anticipates," "believes," "expects," "plans," "intends," "objectives," and similar expressions. These statements reflect management's best judgment based on factors known at the time of such statements. The reader may find discussions containing such forward-looking statements in the material set forth under "Management's Discussion and Analysis and Plan of Operations," generally, and specifically therein under the captions "Liquidity and Capital Resources" as well as elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Actual events or results may differ materially from those discussed herein. The forward-looking statements specified in the following information have been compiled by our management on the basis of assumptions made by management and considered by management to be reasonable. Our future operating results, however, are impossible to predict and no representation, guaranty, or warranty is to be inferred from those forward-looking statements. The assumptions used for purposes of the forward-looking statements specified in the following information represent estimates of future events and are subject to uncertainty as to possible changes in economic, legislative, industry, and other circumstances. As a result, the identification and interpretation of data and other information and their use in developing and selecting assumptions from and among reasonable alternatives require the exercise of judgment. To the extent that the assumed events do not occur, the outcome may vary substantially from anticipated or projected results, and, accordingly, no opinion is expressed on the achievability of those forward-looking statements. No assurance can be given that any of the assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements specified in the following information are accurate, and we assume no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

ITEM 1. BUSINESS

BACKGROUND

We were incorporated as Pharmascan Corp. in the State of Nevada on March 31, 2009. On September 21, 2010, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation and changed our name to Technologies Scan Corp. On April 1, 2014, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to our Articles of Incorporation and changed our name to "PetVivo Holdings, Inc." (the "Name Change"). We filed appropriate documents with FINRA to effect the Name Change. On April 29, 2014, our Name Change from Technologies Scan Corp to "PetVivo Holdings, Inc." was declared effective by FINRA and our common stock's trading symbol was changed to "PETV". Our cusip number is 716817 101.

SUBSIDIARIES

PetVivo

On March 11, 2014, our Board of Directors authorized the execution of that certain securities exchange agreement dated March 11, 2014 (the "Securities Exchange Agreement") with PetVivo Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("PetVivo"), and the shareholders of PetVivo who hold of record the total issued and outstanding shares of common stock of PetVivo (the "PetVivo Shareholders"). In accordance with the terms and provisions of the Securities Exchange Agreement, we will acquire all of the issued and outstanding shares of stock of PetVivo from the PetVivo Shareholders, thus making PetVivo our wholly-owned subsidiary, in exchange for the issuance to the PetVivo Shareholders of an aggregate 2,310,939,804 shares of our restricted common stock.

PetVivo was founded in 2013 by its current management, John Lai and John Dolan, and is based in suburban Minneapolis, Minnesota. PetVivo is a biomedical device company engaged in the business of acquiring/in-licensing and adapting human biomedical technology and products for commercial sale in the veterinary market to treat pets and other animals suffering from arthritis and other painful afflictions. PetVivo's initial product, which is now being commercialized, is a medical device featuring the injections of patented gel-like protein-based biomaterials into the afflicted body parts of pets and other animals suffering from osteoarthritis. PetVivo obtained the exclusive rights for commercialization of this product from Gel-Del for the treatment of pets and other animals.

Gel-Del Technologies Inc.

On November 21, 2014, we entered into a stock exchange agreement (the "Stock Exchange Agreement") with Gel-Del Technologies, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("Gel-Del"). We anticipate consummating the Stock Exchange Agreement with the exchange of all outstanding capital stock of Gel-Del for 4,150,000 shares of common stock of the Company by approximately August 30, 2016. Therefore, this merger transaction will result in Gel-Del becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of ours through a statutory Plan of Exchange complying with the corporate laws of both Nevada and Minnesota. This acquisition of Gel-Del by us is made pursuant to the Stock Exchange Agreement, which contains certain conditions to be performed by both parties prior to the completion of this stock exchange business combination. The merger transaction was contingent on a capital raise in early 2015. As of April 10, 2015, all conditions to close the Stock Exchange Agreement were satisfied or waived by both parties. The shareholders of Gel-Del approved this Stock Exchange Agreement at a Gel-Del shareholder meeting duly held on March 25, 2015. The company will account for this transaction in accordance with the Section 805-10 of the FASB Accounting Standards Codification.

Although consummation of the Gel-Del acquisition has not yet occurred, we have assumed its liabilities and operations effective April 10, 2015. We therefore have accounted for the transaction by recognizing Gel-Del as a variable interest entity ("VIE") and have included its accounts as part of the consolidated group.

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have filed a Preliminary Information Statement on Form 14(c), which is pending review and comment by the Securities and Exchange Commission. After filing the Definitive Information with the Securities and Exchange Commission, we will mail to all shareholders of record and nobo shareholders the Definitive Information Statement providing notice of the corporate action approved both our Board of Directors and majority shareholders. Therefore, Gel-Del will be our wholly-owned subsidiary after 20 days from the date of the mailing of the Information Statement to our shareholders of record. See " -- Merger and Security Exchange Agreement" and " --- Information Statement" below.

Gel-Del is a biomaterial and medical device development and manufacturing company with its offices and production facilities based in St. Paul, Minnesota, and was founded in 1999 by its chief executive officer, Dr. David B. Masters. Dr. Masters developed Gel-Del's proprietary biomaterials which simulate a body's cellular tissue and thus can be readily and effectively utilized to manufacture implantable therapeutic medical devices. The chief advantage of Gel-Del biomaterials is their enhanced biocompatibility with living tissues throughout the body. We are commercializing their technology in the veterinary field for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Gel-Del Technologies has also successfully completed a pivotal clinical trial using their novel thermoplastic biomaterial as a dermal filler for human cosmetic applications. Gel-Del Technologies' core competencies are developing and manufacturing medical devices containing its proprietary thermoplastic protein-based biomaterials that mimic the body's tissue to allow integration, tissue repair, and regeneration for long-term implantation. These biomaterials are produced using a patented and scalable self-assembly production process. The inherent thermoplastic properties of these biomaterials are then utilized to manufacture or coat implantable devices.

While working together relating to their licensing agreement, in early 2014 our management and the management of Gel-Del determined to combine the two companies into one business entity producing, marketing and selling medical products based on Gel-Del technology for both humans and animals.

License Agreement

On August 2, 2013, we entered into that certain licensing agreement with Gel-Del (the "License Agreement"), pursuant to which Gel-Del intends to engage in the manufacture and supply of products derived from technology, including protein based biomaterials and devices which management believes will be beneficial for the veterinary treatment of animals having joint afflictions. We previously paid to Gel-Del an aggregate $488,000. As of the date of this Annual Report, the License Agreement was cancelled based upon the execution and terms and provisions of the Stock Exchange Agreement.

MERGER AND SECURITY EXCHANGE AGREEMENT

On November 21, 2014, we entered into a stock exchange agreement (the "Stock Exchange Agreement") with Gel-Del Technologies, Inc., a Minnesota corporation ("Gel-Del"), having a closing date on or before March 31, 2015. We closed the Stock Exchange Agreement effective April 10, 2015. Therefore, this merger transaction will result in Gel-Del becoming a wholly owned subsidiary of ours through a statutory Plan of Exchange complying with the corporate laws of both Nevada and Minnesota. See --"Information Statements" below.

This statutory stock exchange merger, which was approved by our shareholders and the shareholders of Gel-Del, will result in an exchange by Gel-Del shareholders on a pro rata basis of all outstanding capital stock of Gel-Del in consideration for four million one hundred fifty thousand (4,150,000) shares of our common stock. Since these 4,150,000 shares will not constitute a majority of our post-merger outstanding capital stock, there will be no change of control incident to this transaction. Post-merger management of the combined companies will include all four current principal officers of us and Gel-Del, and their respective management positions are set forth in the Stock Exchange Agreement. See "Item 10. Executive Management".

In accordance with this merger transaction, we will acquire all Gel-Del technology and related patents and other intellectual property (IP) and production techniques, as well as Gel-Del's modern and secure biomedical product manufacturing facilities in St. Paul.

The Stock Exchange Agreement required us to provide a loan for working capital interim funding for Gel-Del until closing of the merger, consisting of an initial payment of $100,000 and monthly payments thereafter of $75,000. As of the date of this Annual Report, we have provided $175,000 to Gel-Del. Gel-Del will execute a promissory note to us for the interim funding, with the terms thereof set forth in the Stock Exchange Agreement. Upon the consummation of the Stock Exchange Agreement, the loan is deemed satisfied.

The Stock Exchange Agreement provided for certain material conditions to be satisfied or waived by closing, including: (i) we shall have secured at least $l,500,000 in equity financing through a private placement on terms governed by the Stock Exchange Agreement; (ii) we shall have maintained our status as a DTC eligible publicly traded company and filed all reports to the SEC required by our status as a registered reporting company; (iii) all outstanding preferred shares and any other convertible securities, warrants, and options of Gel-Del shall be converted, exercised or canceled prior to closing; (iv) Gel-Del must obtain audited financial statements complying with the requirements of U.S. federal securities laws; (v) completion and execution of post-merger employment contracts for our principal executive officers and those of Gel-Del; and (vi) election and designated positions of directors and principal officers for the post-merger combined companies. Additional terms of the Stock Exchange Agreement include guidelines for post-merger management salaries and related employment provisions, approval of a post-merger operations budget, numerous standard warranties and representations of both parties, and standard termination and indemnification provisions, all as detailed in the Stock Exchange Agreement. The Stock Exchange Agreement also requires our Chief Executive Officer, John Lai, to escrow 50% of our shares of common stock owned by him until we have either obtained $5 Million equity financing or has become listed on Nasdaq or the New York Stock Exchange. Upon satisfying one of these conditions, Mr. Lai must remain employed by us to recover his shares from escrow, provided that one-eighth of the escrowed shares will be released to him each quarter of a following two-year period. If Mr. Lai voluntarily terminates his employment or is terminated for cause during this two-year period, he must forfeit to us any remaining shares.

Through this stock exchange, we acquired all Gel-Del's technology and related patents and other intellectual property (IP) and production techniques, as well as Gel-Del's modern and secure biomedical product manufacturing facilities in St. Paul, Minnesota.

Although the Stock Exchange Agreement has been closed, the shares of common stock will not be issued by us to the Gel-Del Shareholders until 20 days from the date of the mailing of the Information Statement to our shareholders of record which takes place after the filing of a definitive Information Statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission and upon the filing of the Plan of Exchange with the Nevada Secretary of State. See "-- Information Statements").

Plan of Exchange and Effect of Stock Exchange

The Plan of Exchange for this business combination which will be filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada is as follows:

Closing of Gel-Del Technologies, Inc. Stock Exchange Agreement

As a result of the comsummation of the Stock Exchange Agreement:

Material relationships between us and Gel-Del include the following:

Reason For Stock Exchange

Gel-Del is a biomaterial and medical device development and manufacturing company with its offices and production facilities based in St. Paul, Minnesota, and was founded in 1999 by its chief executive officer, Dr. David B. Masters. Dr. Masters developed Gel-Del's proprietary biomaterials which simulate a body's cellular tissue and thus can be readily and effectively utilized to manufacture implantable therapeutic medical devices. The chief advantage of Gel-Del biomaterials is their enhanced biocompatibility with living tissues throughout the body. We are commercializing their technology in the veterinary field for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Gel-Del Technologies has also successfully completed a pivotal clinical trial using their novel thermoplastic biomaterial as a dermal filler for human cosmetic applications. Gel-Del Technologies' core competencies are developing and manufacturing medical devices containing its proprietary thermoplastic protein-based biomaterials that mimic the body's tissue to allow integration, tissue repair, and regeneration for long-term implantation. These biomaterials are produced using a patented and scalable self-assembly production process. The inherent thermoplastic properties of these biomaterials are then utilized to manufacture or coat implantable devices.

We were founded in 2013 by our current management, John Lai and John Dolan, and based in suburban Minneapolis, Minnesota. We are a biomedical device company which has been primarily engaged in the business of adapting human biomedical technology for products to be introduced for commercial sale in the veterinary market to treat pets and other animals suffering from arthritis and other painful afflictions. Our initial product, now being commercialized, is a medical device featuring injections of patented gel-like biomaterials into the afflicted body parts of pets or other animals suffering from osteoarthritis. The technology and manufacturing capability of this product was developed by Gel-Del and licensed to us for use to treat dogs and other animals, but not for treatment of human afflictions. While working together relating to this license agreement, we and Gel-Del determined to combine our two companies through a stock exchange merger for the purpose of creating one combined entity utilizing Gel-Del technology to produce, market and sell medical products based on Gel-Del technology for both animals and humans. After lengthy negotiations during 2014, the parties have entered into a definitive agreement for this merger.

INFORMATION STATEMENT

On April 10, 2015, our Board of Directors and majority shareholders, believing it to be in our best interests and of our shareholders: (i) approved the closing of our acquisition of Gel-Del incident to a Plan of Exchange to be filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada (the "Plan of Exchange"), after which Gel-Del will become our wholly-owned subsidiary; and (ii) ratified the appointment by the Board of Directors of two new directors, Dr. David B. Masters and Randall A. Meyer ("Ratification of Appointment of New Directors").

The Information Statement will be furnished to our shareholders as of April 10, 2015 in connection with actions taken by written consent of holders of a substantial majority of our outstanding common shares. These corporate actions consist of (i) approving and adopting the acquisition of Gel-Del through a Plan of Exchange (the "Plan of Exchange"), pursuant to which Gel-Del becomes our wholly-owned subsidiary; and (ii) ratifying the appointment by our Board of Directors of two new directors (the "Ratification of New Directors").

On April 10, 2015, we obtained the approval of the Plan of Exchange and the Ratification of Appointment of New Directors by written consent of our stockholders that are the record holders of 6,672,653 shares of common stock, which represents an aggregate 88.66 % of the voting power of as of the record date of April 10, 2015. The Plan of Exchange and the Ratification of New Directors will not become effective until at least twenty (20) days after the mailing of this Information Statement to our shareholders and the filing of the Plan of Exchange with the Secretary of State of Nevada. The names of the shareholders of record who hold in the aggregate a majority of our total issued and outstanding common stock and who signed the written consent of stockholders are: (i) John Lai holding of record 3,557,939 post-Reverse Stock Split shares of common stock (46.21%); (ii) John F. Dolan holding of record post-Reverse Stock Split 843,894 shares of common stock (1 0.96 %); (iii) Dr. David B. Masters holding of record post-Reverse Stock Split 1,460,645 shares of common stock ( 18.97 %); and (iv) Randall Meyer holding of record post-Reverse Stock Split 810,175 shares of common stock ( 10.52 %).

As of the date of this Annual Report, we are responding to comment from the Securities and Exchange Commission, which pertained to inclusion of our audited financial statements for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. Therefore, we will simultaneously be filing an amendment to the Information Statement containing our audited financial statements for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 and anticipate that the date on which the Definitive Information Statement will be sent to our shareholders will be on or about August 16, 2016. See "Item 1A. Unresolved SEC Comments."

All members of our Board of Directors have approved the Plan of Exchange with Gel-Del and the appointment of our two new directors and shareholders owning a substantial majority of our outstanding common stock have approved these two proposed corporate actions. No other votes or consents are required or necessary.

CURRENT BUSINESS OPERATIONS

General

We intend to leverage investments already expended in the development of human therapeutics to commercialize treatments for pets in a capital and time efficient way. A key component of this strategy is the accelerated timeline to revenues for veterinary medical devices, which enter the market earlier than the more stringently regulated veterinary pharmaceuticals or human therapeutics.

We are planning to aggressively launch its lead product Kush^™ Canine in early 2016. Kush^™ Canine is a veterinarian-administered joint injection for the treatment of osteoarthritis in dogs. The Kush Canine device is made from natural components that are lubricious and cushioning to perform like cartilage for the treatment of pain and inflammation associated with osteoarthritis.

We believe that our Kush Canine osteoarthritis treatment is far superior to current methodology of using NSAID's. NSAID's have many side effects, especially in canines, whereas the company's injected Kush Canine treatment has been found to elicit no adverse side effects. Remarkably, Kush treated dogs show an increase in activity even after they no longer are receiving pain drugs.

No special training is required for the administration of the Kush Canine devices. The treatment is injected into synovial joint space using standard intra-articular injection technique and multiple joints can be treated simul-taneously. Kush Canine immediately treats effects of osteoarthritis with no special post treatment requirements.

Historically, drug sales represent up to 30% of revenues at a typical veterinary practice (Veterinary Practice News). Revenues and margins at veterinary practices are being eroded because online, big box and traditional pharmacies recently started filling veterinary prescriptions. Veterinary practices are looking for ways to replace the lost prescription revenues. Our treatments expand practice revenues & margins because they are veterinarian-administered. Our Kush Canine device is veterinarian-administered to expand practice revenues and margins. We believe that the increased revenues and margins provided by Kush Canine will accelerate it's adoption rate and propel it forward as the standard of care for canine osteoarthritis.

Our product launch schedule includes two additional product releases in 2016. Our Kush Equine device for the treatment of equine lameness related to or impacting synovial joints is scheduled for launch in Q4 2016. The Kush Equine product has similar features and benefits as our Kush Canine device. In addition to being a treatment for osteoarthritis, the joint cushioning and lubricity effects of our devices have shown an ability to treat equine lameness that is due to navicular disease (a problem associated with misalignment of joints and bones in the hoof and digits). We anticipate launching our Kush Digital Cushion (DC) device for the treatment of navicular disease in 2017.

Based on a variety of industry sources we estimate that 1 million owned horses in the United Stated and European Union suffer from lameness and/or navicular disease each year, making the equine lameness and navicular disease market an annual opportunity worth $600 million.

Our current pipeline includes 17 therapeutic devices for both veterinary and human clinical applications.

We anticipate growing our product pipeline through the acquisition or in-licensing of additional proprietary products from human medical device companies specifically for use in pets. In addition to commercializing our own products in strategic market sectors and in view of the Company's vast proprietary product pipeline, the Company anticipates establishing strategic out-licensing partnerships to provide secondary revenues.

We plan to commercialize our products in the United States through distribution relationships supported by regional and complemented by the use of social media educating and informing the pet owners, and in Europe and rest of world through commercial partners.

Most veterinarians in the United States buy a majority of their equipment and supplies from one of six veterinary products distributors. Combined these six distributors delivery more than 85%, by revenue, of the products sold to companion animal veterinarians in the U.S. Our product distribution will leverage the existing supply chain and veterinary clinic and clinician relationships already established by these large distributors. We plan to support this distribution channel with regional sales representatives. Our representatives will support our distributors and the veterinary clinics and hospitals. We will also target pet owners with product education and treatment awareness campaigns utilizing a variety of social media tools. The unique nature and the anticipated benefits provided by our products is expected to generate significant consumer response.

Gel-Del Particles have been through a human trial and have been classified as a medical device. The FDA does not require submission of a 510(k) or formal pre-market approval for medical devices used in veterinary medicine. We anticipate initial commercial production and sales in early 2016. We anticipate selling through existing veterinary distributors. See -- "Gel-Del Technology" below.

Gel-Del Technology

Our wholly-owned subsidiary entered into that certain exclusive license agreement and manufacturing and supply agreement dated August 2, 2013 (the "License Agreement") with Gel-Del pertaining to the manufacture and supply of products by Gel-Del derived from certain technology, including protein-based biomaterials and devices, which are beneficial for the veterinary treatment of animals having orthopedic joint afflictions (the "Technology"). We have since terminated the License Agreement based upon consummation of the merger transaction with Gel-Del.

Gel-Del is a biomaterial and medical device manufacturing company based in St. Paul, Minnesota. We will be working together to commercialize Gel-Del's technology in the veterinary field for the treatment of osteoarthritis. Gel-Del has also successfully completed a pivotal clinical trial using their novel thermoplastic biomaterial as a dermal filler for human cosmetic applications. Gel-Del's core competencies are developing and manufacturing medical devices containing its proprietary thermoplastic protein-based biomaterials that mimic the body's tissue to allow integration, tissue repair, and regeneration for long-term implantation. These biomaterials are produced using a patented and scalable self-assembly production process. The inherent thermoplastic properties of these biomaterials are then utilized to manufacture or coat implantable devices.

Below is a listing of Gel-Del technologies:

Dermal Filler

Cardiovascular Devices

Drug Delivery

Orthopedic Devices

Wound Healing and In Vitro Devices

The ability of Gel-Del material to simulate body tissue is the technology behind BioSimix products. Applying bio-integrative materials to troubled soft tissue by itself or with cells, can aid the healing-repair process. The first products planned, WoundGelic™ and CelGelic™, mimic the structural components of tissue to allow integration and healing with and without cells, respectively.

Intellectual Property

To maximize the strength and value of our patent portfolio many of the claims use the transitional term "comprising", which is synonymous with "including,". This use of transitional language is inclusive or open-ended and does not exclude additional, unrecited elements or method steps. Our patents also include method claims covering many of the applications and uses of the biomaterials as medical devices and drug delivery systems. With eight issued or allowed United States Patents that contain 328 claims, our intellectual property portfolio strongly protects our proprietary technology, including the composition of raw elements used to produce our formulations, the fabricated biomaterials and their application in end products, thereby making our material and devices much more attractive to industry partners.

We will seek to protect our products and technologies through a combination of patents, regulatory exclusivity, and proprietary know-how. Our goal is to obtain, maintain and enforce patent protection for our products, formulations, processes, methods and other proprietary technologies, preserve our trade secrets, and operate without infringing on the proprietary rights of other parties, both in the United States and in other countries. Our policy is to actively seek to obtain, where appropriate, the broadest intellectual property protection possible for our current compounds and any future compounds in development. We also strenuously protect our proprietary information and proprietary technology through a combination of contractual arrangements, trade secrets and patents, both in the United States and abroad. However, even patent protection may not always afford us with complete protection against competitors who seek to circumvent our patents.

We depend upon the skills, knowledge and experience of our scientific and technical personnel, including those of our company, as well as that of our advisors, consultants and other contractors, none of which is patentable. To help protect our proprietary know-how, which may not be patentable, and inventions for which patents may be difficult to obtain or enforce, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect our interests. To this end, we generally require all of our employees, consultants, advisors and other contractors to enter into confi-dentiality agreements that prohibit disclosure of confidential information and, where applicable, require disclosure and assignment of ownership to us the ideas, developments, discoveries and inventions important to our business.

Companion Animal Market

Osteoarthritis Market. Osteoarthritis, the most common inflammatory joint disease in both dogs and horses, is a progressive condition that is caused by a deterioration of joint cartilage. Over time the joint cartilage deterioration creates joint stiffness from mechanical stress resulting in inflammation, pain and loss of range of motion, which may be referred to as lameness. Osteoarthritis joint stiffness and lameness worsens with time from gradual cartilage degeneration and an ongoing loss of protective cushion and lubricity (i.e., loss of slippery padding). As there is no cure for osteoarthritis, the various treatment methods are focused on managing the related symptoms of pain and inflammation. Veterinarians recommend several treatments depending on the severity of the disease, including a combination of rest, weight loss, physical rehabilitation, and a regimen of pain and anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs). Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS) are used to alleviate the pain and inflammation caused by OA, but long-term NSAIDS cause gastric problems. Moreover, NSAIDS do not treat the cartilage degeneration issue to halt or slow progression of the OA condition.

The prevalence of companion animal osteoarthritis is estimated through a variety of methods. In looking at the dog osteoarthritis incidence Spence Johnston's article "Osteoarthritis. Joint anatomy, physiology, and pathobiology" is often cited, this article reports that 20% of all dogs over the age of one year suffer from osteoarthritis. Using this simple methodology, management has estimated that 20% of the total dog population is under age one.

83.3 million – 20% = 66.6 million x 20% with OA = 13.3 million dogs with OA in U.S.

Our osteoarthritis market data has been validated by a number of reports evaluating a new NSAID that is estimated to be ready for commercial sale by Aratana Therapeutics, Inc. (PETX) in 2016. Craig-Hallum's July 22, 2013 institutional research report on Aratana Therapeutics estimates the U.S. dog osteoarthritis market at 16.6 million dogs. William Blair & Company, L.L.C. released a July 25, 2013 Equity Research report by Aratana Therapeutics that concluded that roughly 10% of dogs and cat suffer from osteoarthritis. (83.3 million dogs x 10% = 8.3 million dogs with OA) Stifel issued report on Aratana Therapeutics dated July 22, 2013 that estimated the osteoarthritis market to be 55% of dogs over the age of 10. This equates to a US market in 2014 of 7.1 million dogs with osteoarthritis.

Horse Osteoarthritis (Lameness)

The equine osteoarthritis is the most common cause of lameness in horses. The annual average costs for diagnosis and treatment of equine lameness $3,000 per horse, with downtime & homecare costs being much higher (Oke and McIlwraith, 2010). "The USDA National Economic Cost of Equine Lameness… in the United States" published by 1978 places the annual incidence of lameness at 8.5-13.7 lameness events/100 horses.

As noted previously the APPA reported the total number of horses owned by U.S. households increased to 8.3 million in 2012. A 2007 publication by Emily Kilby "The Demographics of the U.S. Equine Population" concludes the horse population for 9,464,200 in 2006 with racehorses being 9% of that population or 846,000 horses. The article "The Occurrence and Causes of Lameness and Laminitis in the U.S. Horse Population" estimates that 17% of racehorses and 5.4% of the rest of the horse population go lame annually. Based on the above assumptions we calculate that there are up to 611,658 new lame horses each year.

Distribution

Most U.S. veterinarians buy a majority of their equipment and supplies from a preferred distributor. More than 75% of veterinarians name Butler Schein Animal Health, Inc., Webster Veterinary Supply Inc. (recently acquired by Patterson), MWI, Midwest Veterinary Supply, Inc. or Victor Medical Company as their preferred distributor. Combined, these top tier distributors sell more than 85%, by revenue, of the products sold to companion animal veterinarians in the U.S. Butler, Webster and MWI are recognized by manufacturers, distributors and veterinarians as the pre-eminent national companion animal veterinary supply distributors in the US. There are no other distributors that provide equivalent levels of service to manufacturers and regularly visit veterinarians in as widea geographic area as Butler, Webster or MWI. Midwest and Victor are large, regional distributors, also with strong reputations for high-quality service. The above data in this paragraph was sourced from File No. 101 0023 at the U.S. Federal Trade Commission.

Our product distribution will leverage the existing supply chain and veterinary clinic and clinician relationships already established by these large distributors. We intend to support and supplement this distribution channel with regional business development & training representatives. Our business development representatives will provide product training to distribution representatives, veterinarians and other veterinary staff. In addition our representatives will exhibit at key veterinary conferences in addition to supporting ongoing case studies. All of these sales, distribution, marketing and education efforts will also be supported by both veterinarian and pet owner product education and treatment awareness campaigns that will be conducted utilizing a variety of social media tools. The unique nature and the anticipated benefits provided by our first product is expected to generate significant consumer response.

Our primary distribution channel is through the existing stocking distributors who having operating typical margins between fourteen to sixteen percent. We have budgeted a twenty percent margin for our distributors and a full fifty percent margin for the veterinary practices.

Gel-Del Particle Devices

Orthopedic Joint Treatments

Regenerative Characteristics

The particles devices for joint injections have been extensively studied for a broad range of applications including the treatment of wrinkles as a dermal filler. Here is an overview of the pre-clinical and clinical studies completed on CosmetaLife, which is the name used for particle device when they used as a dermal filler.

CosmetaLife is an easy-to-inject, water-protein-based dermal filler that not only fills nasolabial wrinkle depressions but also helps rejuvenate the dermal tissues, counteracting damage that causes wrinkles. The dermal cells are attracted to the CosmetaLife gel-particles, attach to them, and then slowly replace them with natural dermal material (extracellular matrix). The natural biological replacement process of CosmetaLife to collagen is estimated to take 6-12 months. CosmetaLife clinical trial on nasolabial folds supports this estimate. According to current scientific thought, the resulting natural extracellular matrix, comprised mostly of collagen, is estimated to last 10-16 years.

CosmetaLife injections allow the body to create more natural dermal structure in and around every particle. Enhancing the natural process of dermal tissue construction with CosmetaLife allows for long-term dermal contouring, corrections, and rejuvenation with little to no adverse side effects noted in clinical trials.

Particle Device Clinical Studies.

The results of the histological report on the rabbit skin biopsies clearly demonstrate structural integration of the particles into the host tissues by week 12. Evaluators observed the particle material integration with normal tissue, remodeled and/or new collagen, and fibroblasts throughout the injected particles, mild to no inflammation, and new collagen-matrix production.

An Food and Drug Adminstration (FDA) IDE approved pivotal human clinical trial was begun with CosmetaLife late in 2006. The clinical trial was a randomized, double blind, parallel assignment, multi-center comparison of the safety and efficacy of CosmetaLife versus Restylane^Ò (Control) for the correction of nasolabial folds. One hundred seventy-one patients were skin tested and 145 were treated at six trial sites. The number of study exits after treatment totaled four subjects. This clinical trial was reported and published at www.clinicaltrial.gov (NCT00414544).

The feedback from physician investigators has been positive with respect to CosmetaLife injection qualities, cosmetic appearance, and its feel to the touch. During the first three to four months of the study, CosmetaLife showed no decrease in efficacy, as compared to Restylane that showed an 11 percent decrease in efficacy. The FDA/IDE approved human clinical trial for the CosmetaLife product through twelve months was found to be the same as compared to control hyaluronic acid product, Restylane (For each interval the consensus of the blinded subjects tested preferred CosmetaLife or showed no preference at 3, 6, 9 and 12 months).

Gel-Del Technologies uses existing, scalable processes to reduce the infrastructure requirements and manufacturing risks to deliver a consistent high quality product while being responsive to volume requirements. Gel-Del is scaling the manufacturing process for Gel-Del Particles production, to date making batches in up to 2.0-kilogram quantities to near GMP (Good Manufacturing Practices) standards acceptable for human clinical trials.

Particles Safety Study. Patients injected with CosmetaLife were found to have no or mild inflammatory, irritation, or immunogenic responses. These results suggest the particles is biocompatible because it closely matches the skin structure, composition, and moisture content. The no to low immunogenic responses are attributed to the tight cross-linking of the GDP matrix, which prevents immunogenic progenitor cells from producing antibodies.

Extrusion force testing and the Clinical Trial usage both demonstrate the consistent and easy injection of GDP.

Twenty-five month stability testing shows that GDP is stable at room temperature conditions. Moreover, GDP has been shown to be stable at 40 °C (104 °F) conditions for at least 3 months.

Competition

The development and commercialization of new animal health medicines is highly competitive, and we expect considerable competition from major pharmaceutical, biotechnology and specialty animal health medicines companies. As a result, there are, and likely will continue to be, extensive research and substantial financial resources invested in the discovery and development of new animal health medicines. Our potential competitors include large animal health companies, such as Zoetis, Inc.; Merck Animal Health, the animal health division of Merck & Co., Inc.; Merial, the animal health division of Sanofi S.A.; Elanco, the animal health division of Eli Lilly and Company; Bayer Animal Health, the animal health division of Bayer AG; NAH, the animal health division of Novartis AG; Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, the animal health division of Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH; Virbac Group; Ceva Animal Health; Vetoquinol and Dechra Pharmaceuticals PLC. We are also aware of several smaller early stage animal health companies, such as Kindred Bio, Aratana Therapeutics Inc., NextVet and VetDC that are developing products for use in the pet therapeutics market.

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

An investment in our securities involves a high degree of risk. You should carefully consider the risks described below together with all of the other information included in this report before making an investment decision with regard to our securities. If any of the following risks actually occurs, our business, financial condition, and/or results of operations could be harmed. In that case, the trading price of our common stock could decline, and you may lose all or part of your investment. You should only purchase our securities if you can afford to suffer the loss of your entire investment.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR BUSINESS

We have a limited operating history upon which an evaluation of our prospects can be made.

We were incorporated in March 2009. Our lack of operating history makes an evaluation of our business and prospects very difficult. Our prospects must be considered speculative, considering the risks, expenses, and difficulties frequently encountered in the establishment of a new business. We cannot be certain that our business will be successful or that we will generate significant revenues. As of the date of this Annual Report, we have not commenced business operations involving the marketing and sale and distribution of the Gel-Del products. We may never be successful in developing a market for our products and thus may never become profitable. Therefore, our ability to operate our business successfully remains untested. If we are successful in marketing our products, we anticipate that we will retain future earnings, if any, and other cash resources for the future operation and development of our business as appropriate. We do not currently anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Payment of any future dividends is solely at the discretion of our board of directors, which will take into account many factors including our operating results, financial conditions and anticipated cash needs. For these reasons, we may never achieve profitability or pay dividends.

We anticipate that our ability to generate revenues in the foreseeable future will depend on the successful development and commercialization of our products. If we are not successful in commercializing the products or are significantly delayed or limited in doing so, our business will be materially adversely affected and we may need to curtail or cease operations.

Because we are a development stage company, we have no revenues to sustain our operations.

We are a development stage company that is currently developing our business. To date, we have not generated revenues. The success of our business operations will depend upon our ability to obtain customers and provide quality products to those customers. We are not able to predict whether we will be able to develop our business and generate revenues. If we are not able to complete the successful development of our business plan, generate revenues and attain sustainable operations, then our business will fail.

We have incurred a net loss since inception and expect to incur net losses for the foreseeable future.

During fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, our net loss was $3,265,086. We expect to incur operating and capital expenditures for the next year and, as a result, we expect significant net losses in the future. We will need to generate significant revenues to develop our business and expand our operations. We may not be able to generate sufficient revenues to achieve profitable operations.

We will need to raise additional capital to subsequently market the Gel-Del products and expand our operations. Our failure to raise additional capital will significantly affect our ability to fund our proposed activities.

We are currently not engaged in any sophisticated marketing program to market our products because we lack capital and revenues to justify the expenditure. In addition, our available funds will not fund our activities for the next twelve months. If we fail to raise additional funds, investors may lose their entire cash investment.

Our future capital requirements depend on many factors, including, but not limited to:

Additional funds may not be available when we need them on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all. If adequate funds are not available to us on a timely basis, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate:

We are substantially dependent on the success of our current product candidates.

We currently have the Kush™ Canine Particles ready for commercial distribution as a medical device. To date, we have invested nearly all of our efforts and financial resources in the prior in-licensing, research and development of the Kush™ Canine Particles.

Our near-term prospects, including our ability to finance our company and to enter into strategic collaborations and generate revenue, will depend heavily on the successful development and commercialization of our current product candidates. The development and commercial success of our current product candidates will depend on a number of factors, including the following:

Many of these factors are beyond our control. Accordingly, we cannot assure you that we will ever be able to generate revenue through the sale of our product candidates. If we are not successful in commercializing one or more of our product candidates, or are significantly delayed in doing so, our business will be materially harmed and the value of your investment could substantially decline.

We may be unable to obtain all required regulatory approvals for our existing or future product candidates under applicable regulatory requirements. The denial or delay of any such approval would delay commercialization efforts and adversely impact our potential to generate revenue, our business and our results of operations.

Our product candidates are in various stages of development, and with regards to some of these product candidates, our business depends up on their successful development, regulatory approval and commercialization. We currently have no products approved for sale and we may never obtain regulatory approval to commercialize any of our other current or future product candidates. The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, approval, sale, marketing and distribution of therapeutics products are subject to extensive regulation by the CVM, the USDA, the EMA and other regulatory authorities in the United States and other countries, whose regulations differ from country to country. We are not permitted to market our products in the United States until we receive approval of a New Animal Drug Application, or NADA, from the CVM or a full product license from the USDA with respect to our biologic products, or in Europe until we receive approval from the European Commission or applicable EU State national competent authorities.

Even if we receive approval of an NADA, USDA product license or foreign regulatory filing for our product candidates, the CVM, the USDA or the applicable foreign regulatory body may approve our product candidates for a more limited indication than we originally requested, and the CVM or the USDA may not approve the labeling that we believe is necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of our product candidates. Any delay in obtaining, or inability to obtain, applicable regulatory approval would delay or prevent commercialization of our product candidates and would materially adversely impact our business and prospects.

Even if our current or future product candidates obtain regulatory approval, they may never achieve market acceptance or commercial success.

Even if we obtain CVM, USDA, EMA or other regulatory approvals, our current or future product candidates may not achieve market acceptance among veterinarians/clinicians and owners, and may not be commercially successful. Market acceptance of any of our current or future product candidates for which we receive approval depends on a number of factors, including:

Any failure by our product candidates that obtain regulatory approval to achieve market acceptance or commercial success would adversely affect our financial results.

We may not realize all of the anticipated benefits of our contractual arrangement with Gel-Del or those benefits may take longer to realize than expected. We may also encounter significant unexpected difficulties in integrating these businesses.

Our ability to realize the anticipated benefits of our contractual relations with Gel-Del will depend in part on our ability to integrate its business with ours. The combination of independent businesses is a complex, costly and time-consuming process. As a result, we will be required to devote significant management attention and resources to integrating the business practices and operations of Gel-Del. The integration process may disrupt the businesses and, if implemented ineffectively, would preclude realization of the full benefits expected by us. Our failure to meet the challenges involved in integrating the businesses to realize the anticipated benefits of the transaction could cause an interruption of, or a loss of momentum in, our activities and could adversely affect our results of operations.

In addition, the overall integration of the businesses may result in material unanticipated problems, expenses, liabilities, competitive responses, and diversion of management's attention. The difficulties of combining the operations of the companies include, among others:

Many of these factors will be outside of our control and any one of them could result in increased costs and diversion of management's time and energy, which could materially impact our business, financial condition and results of operations. In addition, even if the operations of the businesses are integrated successfully, we may not realize the full benefits of the transaction, including the synergies or growth opportunities that we expect. These benefits may not be achieved within the anticipated time frame, or at all.

Development of pet therapeutics involves an expensive and lengthy process with an uncertain outcome, and results of earlier studies may not be predictive of future study results.

Development of pet therapeutics is expensive and can take many years to complete, and its outcome is inherently uncertain. To gain approval to market a pet therapeutic for a particular species of pet, we must provide the CVM, the USDA or foreign regulatory authorities, as applicable, with data from animal safety and effectiveness studies that adequately demonstrate the safety and efficacy of that product in the target animal for the intended indication applied for in the NADA, product license or other regulatory filing. We rely on contract research organizations, or CROs, and other third parties to ensure the proper and timely conduct of our studies and development efforts and, while we have agreements governing their committed activities, we have limited influence over their actual performance. Failure can occur at any time during the development process. Success in prior target animal studies or in the treatment of human beings with a product candidate does not ensure that our target animal studies will be successful and the results of development efforts by other parties may not be indicative of the results of our target animal studies and other development efforts. Product candidates in our studies may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy despite showing such results in initial data or previous human or animal studies conducted by other parties. Even if our studies and other development efforts are completed, the results may not be sufficient to obtain regulatory approval for our product candidates.

Once our target animal studies commence, we may experience delays in such studies and other development efforts and we do not know whether planned studies will begin on time, need to be redesigned or be completed on schedule, if at all. Pet therapeutics studies can be delayed or discontinued for a variety of reasons, including delay or failure to:

If we experience delays in the completion of, or terminate any development efforts for our product candidates, the commercial prospects of our product candidates will be harmed, and our ability to generate product revenues from any of these product candidates will be delayed. In addition, any delays in completing our development efforts will increase our costs, slow down our product candidate development and approval process and jeopardize our ability to commence product sales and generate revenues. Any of these occurrences may harm our business, financial condition and prospects significantly. In addition, many of the factors that cause, or lead to, a delay in the commencement or completion of our development efforts may also ultimately lead to the denial of regulatory approval of our product candidates.

Our product candidates, if approved, will face significant competition and our failure to effectively compete may prevent us from achieving significant market penetration.

The development and commercialization of pet therapeutics is highly competitive, and we expect considerable competition from major pharmaceutical, biotechnology and specialty animal health medicines companies. As a result, there are, and will likely continue to be, extensive research and substantial financial resources invested in the discovery and development of new pet therapeutics. Our potential competitors include large animal health companies, such as Zoetis, Inc.; Merck Animal Health, the animal health division of Merck & Co., Inc.; Merial, the animal health division of Sanofi S.A.; Elanco, the animal health division of Eli Lilly and Company; Bayer Animal Health, the animal health division of Bayer AG; Boehringer Ingelheim Animal Health, the animal health division of Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH; Novartis Animal Health, the animal health division of Novartis AG; Virbac Group; Ceva Animal Health; Vetoquinol and Dechra Pharmaceuticals PLC. We are also aware of several smaller early stage animal health companies such as Kindred Bio, Aratana Therapeutics, NextVet and VetDC that are developing products for use in the pet therapeutics market.

We are an early-stage company with a limited history of operations and many of our competitors have substantially more resources than we do, including both financial and technical resources. In addition, many of our competitors have more experience than we have in the development, manufacture, regulation and worldwide commercialization of animal health medicines. We are also competing with academic institutions, governmental agencies and private organizations that are conducting research in the field of animal health medicines.

Our competition will be determined in part by the potential indications for which our products are developed and ultimately approved by regulatory authorities. Additionally, the timing of market introduction of some of our potential products or of competitors' products may be an important competitive factor. Accordingly, the speed with which we can develop our compounds, complete target animal studies and approval processes, and supply commercial quantities to market are expected to be important competitive factors. We expect that competition among products approved for sale will be based on various factors, including product efficacy, safety, reliability, availability, price and patent position.

If we are not successful in identifying, licensing or acquiring, developing and commercializing additional product candidates, our ability to expand our business and achieve our strategic objectives would be impaired.

Although a substantial amount of our effort will focus on the continued development and potential approval of our current Gel-Del Particles product candidate, a key element of our strategy is to identify, license or acquire, develop and commercialize a portfolio of products to serve the pet therapeutics market. Even if we successfully identify and license further potential product candidates, we may still fail to yield product candidates for development and commercialization for many reasons, including the following:

If we fail to develop and successfully commercialize other product candidates, our business and future prospects may be harmed and our business will be more vulnerable to any problems that we encounter in developing and commercializing our current and future product candidates.

If we fail to attract and keep senior management and key scientific personnel, we may be unable to successfully develop any of our current or future product candidates, conduct our in-licensing and development efforts and commercialize any of our current or future product candidates.

Our success depends in part on our continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified management and scientific personnel. We are highly dependent upon our senior management, as well as our senior scientists and other members of our senior management team. The loss of services of any of these individuals could delay or prevent the successful development of our current or future product pipeline, completion of our planned development efforts or the commercialization of our product candidates.

Competition for qualified personnel in the animal health fields is intense due to the limited number of individuals who possess the skills and experience required by our industry. We will need to hire additional personnel as we expand our development and commercial activities. We may not be able to attract and retain quality personnel on acceptable terms, or at all. In addition, to the extent we hire personnel from competitors, we may be subject to allegations that they have been improperly solicited or that they have divulged proprietary or other confidential information, or that their former employers own their research output.

We rely completely on Gel-Del to manufacture the supplies for the Gel-Del Particles development of our products.

With respect to our proposed products, we do not currently have, nor do we currently plan to acquire, the infrastructure or capability internally to manufacture the formulated Gel-Del Particles for use in the conduct of our target animal studies. We also lack the resources and the capability to manufacture any of our product candidates on a scale necessary for commercialization.

The facilities used by our contract manufacturers to manufacture the active pharmaceutical ingredients and products may be subject to inspections by the CVM, the USDA or the EMA that will be conducted after we submit our NADA to the CVM, and approval by the CVM, or during the USDA licensing process. We do not control the manufacturing processes used by, and we are completely dependent on, Gel-Del to comply with cGMP for the manufacture of both ingredients and finished products. If Gel-Del cannot successfully manufacture material that conforms to our specifications and is made in compliance with the strict regulatory requirements of the CVM, the USDA or other regulatory authorities, they will not be able to secure and/or maintain regulatory approval for their manufacturing facilities. In addition, we have little control over the ability of Gel-Del to maintain adequate quality control and quality assurance practices and to engage qualified personnel. If the CVM, the USDA or the EMA does not approve our contract manufacturers' facilities used for the manufacture of our product candidates, or if it withdraws any such approval in the future, we may need to find alternative manufacturing facilities, which would adversely impact our ability to develop, obtain regulatory approval for or market our product candidates, if approved.

Furthermore, we and Gel-Del are continuing to refine and improve the manufacturing process for our product candidates, certain aspects of which are complex and unique. We may encounter difficulties with new or existing manufacturing processes, particularly if we seek to increase our manufacturing capacity significantly to support commercialization of our product candidates, if approved. Our reliance on contract manufacturers also requires us to provide trade secrets or other proprietary information to others engaged to make our products, increasing the possibility that our trade secrets or other proprietary information may be disclosed or misappropriated.

The commercialization of any of our Gel-Del Particles product candidates could be stopped, delayed or made less profitable if third-party manufacturers fail to provide us with sufficient quantities of product or fail to do so at acceptable quality levels or prices and in a timely manner.

To manufacture our product candidates in the quantities that we believe would be required to meet anticipated market demand, our third-party manufacturers may need to increase manufacturing capacity, which could involve significant challenges and may require additional regulatory approvals. In addition, the development of commercial-scale manufacturing capabilities may require us and our third-party manufacturers to invest substantial additional funds and hire and retain technical personnel who have the necessary manufacturing experience. Neither we nor our third-party manufacturers may successfully complete any manufacturing scale-up activities required to increase existing manufacturing capabilities in a timely manner, or at all.

The raw materials used to manufacture our products are generally readily available and can be obtained from multiple suppliers in commercial quantities. However, we rely on our contract manufacturers to obtain any raw materials necessary to manufacture our products, and we do not have any control over the process or timing of the acquisition of these materials. Furthermore, if there is a disruption to our or our third-party manufacturers' relevant operations, we will have no other means of producing our product candidates until they restore the affected facilities or we or they procure alternative manufacturing facilities or raw materials. Additionally, any damage to or destruction of our third-party manufacturers' facilities or equipment may significantly impair our ability to manufacture product candidates on a timely basis.

We currently rely on third parties to conduct all of our target animal studies and certain other development efforts. If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or meet expected deadlines, we may be unable to obtain regulatory approval for or commercialize our current or future product candidates.

We currently do not conduct our target animal studies, and we rely on CROs to conduct these studies. The third parties with whom we contract for the execution of our studies play a significant role in the conduct of these studies and the subsequent collection and analysis of data. However, these third parties are not our employees, and except for contractual duties and obligations, we have limited ability to control the amount or timing of resources that they devote to our programs. Although we rely on these third parties to conduct our studies, we remain responsible for ensuring that each of our studies is conducted in accordance with the development plan and protocol. Moreover, the CVM, the USDA and EMA require us to comply with regulations and standards, commonly referred to as current good clinical practices, ("cGCPs"), or good laboratory practices, ("GLPs"), for conducting, monitoring, recording and reporting the results of our studies to ensure that the data and results are scientifically credible and accurate.

In addition, the execution of target animal studies and the subsequent compilation and analysis of the data produced requires coordination among various parties. In order for these functions to be carried out effectively and efficiently, it is imperative that these parties communicate and coordinate with one another. Moreover, these third parties may also have relationships with other commercial entities, some of which may compete with us. Many of our potential agreements with these third parties may be terminated by these third parties upon as little as 30 days' prior written notice of a material breach by us that is not cured within 30 days. Many of these agreements may also be terminated by such third parties under certain other circumstances, including our insolvency or our failure to comply with applicable laws. In general, these agreements require such third parties to reasonably cooperate with us at our expense for an orderly winding down of services of such third parties under the agreements. If the third parties conducting our target animal studies do not perform their contractual duties or obligations, experience work stoppages, do not meet expected deadlines, terminate their agreements with us or need to be replaced, or if the quality or accuracy of the data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our development protocols or cGCPs, or for any other reason, we may need to enter into new arrangements with alternative third parties, which could be difficult and costly, and our target animal studies may be extended, delayed or terminated or may need to be repeated. If any of the foregoing were to occur, the regulatory approval for and commercialization of the product candidate being tested in such studies may be delayed or require us to utilize additional resources.

We currently have no sales organization. If we are unable to establish sales capabilities on our own or through third parties, we may not be able to market and sell our current or future product candidates, if approved, or generate product revenue.

We currently do not have a sales organization. In order to commercialize any of our current or future product candidates in the United States and any jurisdictions outside the United States, we must build our marketing, sales, distribution, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services, and we may not be successful in doing so. We expect to establish a direct sales organization in the United States, complemented by distributors, to commercialize our product candidates, which will be expensive and time-consuming. Outside of the United States we intend to partner with companies with an established commercial presence to market our products in those locations. If we are unable to enter into such arrangements on acceptable terms or at all, we may not be able to successfully commercialize our current product candidates or any future product candidates that receive regulatory approval. We have no prior experience in the marketing, sale and distribution of pet therapeutics and there are significant risks involved in building and managing a sales organization, including our ability to hire, retain and motivate qualified individuals, generate sufficient sales leads, provide adequate training to sales and marketing personnel, and effectively oversee a geographically dispersed sales and marketing team. Any failure or delay in the development of our internal sales, marketing and distribution capabilities would adversely impact the commercialization of these products. If we are not successful in commercializing any of our current or future product candidates, either on our own or through collaborations with one or more distributors, our future product revenue will suffer and we would incur significant additional losses.

We will need to increase the size of our organization, and we may experience difficulties in managing growth.

We will need to continue to expand our managerial, operational, financial and other resources in order to manage our operations and target animal studies, continue our development activities and commercialize any of our current or future product candidates. Our management and personnel, systems and facilities currently in place may not be adequate to support this future growth. Our need to effectively execute our growth strategy requires that we:

We are incurring significant costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management is expected to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.

As a privately-held company, we were not required to comply with certain corporate governance and financial reporting practices and policies required of a publicly-traded company. As a publicly-traded company, we have incurred and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we were not required to incur in the recent past, particularly after we are no longer an "emerging growth company" as defined under the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. In addition, new and changing laws, regulations and standards relating to corporate governance and public disclosure, including the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act and the rules and regulations promulgated and to be promulgated thereunder, as well as under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, the JOBS Act, and the rules and regulations of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and The NASDAQ Global Market, have created uncertainty for public companies and increased our costs and time that our board of directors and management must devote to complying with these rules and regulations. We expect these rules and regulations to increase our legal and financial compliance costs and lead to a diversion of management time and attention from revenue-generating activities.

Furthermore, the need to establish the corporate infrastructure demanded of a public company may divert management's attention from implementing our growth strategy, which could prevent us from improving our business, results of operations and financial condition. We have made, and will continue to make, changes to our internal controls and procedures for financial reporting and accounting systems to meet our reporting obligations as a publicly-traded company. However, the measures we take may not be sufficient to satisfy our obligations as a publicly-traded company.

For as long as we remain an "emerging growth company" as defined in the JOBS Act, we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not "emerging growth companies." These exemptions provide for, but are not limited to, relief from the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, less extensive disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements, exemptions from the requirements to hold a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved and an extended transition period for complying with new or revised accounting standards. We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an "emerging growth company." We may remain an "emerging growth company" for up to five years. To the extent we are no longer eligible to use exemptions from various reporting requirements under the JOBS Act; we may be unable to realize our anticipated cost savings from those exemptions.

We are not currently required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, and failure to achieve and maintain effective internal control over financial reporting in accordance with Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, when applicable, could have a material adverse effect on our business and share price.

As an emerging growth company, we are not required to evaluate our internal control over financial reporting in a manner that meets the standards of publicly-traded companies required by Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, or Section 404. We anticipate being required to meet these standards in the course of preparing our consolidated financial statements as of and for the year ended March 31, 2017 and our management will be required to report on the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting for such year. Additionally, under the recently enacted JOBS Act, our independent registered public accounting firm will not be required to attest to the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting pursuant to Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act until we are no longer an "emerging growth company." The rules governing the standards that must be met for our management to assess our internal control over financial reporting are complex and require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation.

A material weakness in internal control was identified in connection with the preparation of our financial statements and the audit of our financial results. In order to remedy the material weakness, we will need to implement resulting improvements in our internal controls. In connection with the implementation of the necessary procedures and practices related to internal control over financial reporting, we may identify deficiencies that we may not be able to remediate in time to meet the deadline imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act for compliance with the requirements of Section 404. In addition, we may encounter problems or delays in completing the implementation of any requested improvements and receiving a favorable attestation in connection with the attestation provided by our independent registered public accounting firm. We will be unable to issue securities in the public markets through the use of a shelf registration statement if we are not in compliance with Section 404. Furthermore, failure to achieve and maintain an effective internal control environment could have a material adverse effect on our business and share price and could limit our ability to report our financial results accurately and timely.

Changes in distribution channels for pet therapeutics could negatively impact our market share, margins and distribution of our products.

In most markets, pet owners typically purchase their pet therapeutics directly from veterinarians. Pet owners increasingly could purchase pet therapeutics from sources other than veterinarians, such as Internet-based retailers, "big-box" retail stores or other over-the-counter distribution channels. This trend has been demonstrated by the significant shift away from the veterinarian distribution channel in the sale of parasiticides and vaccines in recent years. Pet owners also could decrease their reliance on, and visits to, veterinarians as they rely more on Internet-based animal health information. Because we expect to market our pet prescription products through the veterinarian distribution channel, any decrease in visits to veterinarians by pet owners could reduce our market share for such products and materially adversely affect our operating results and financial condition. In addition, pet owners may substitute human health products for pet therapeutics if human health products are deemed to be lower-cost alternatives.

Legislation has also been proposed in the United States, and may be proposed in the United States or abroad in the future, that could impact the distribution channels for our pet products. For example, such legislation may require veterinarians to provide pet owners with written prescriptions and disclosure that the pet owner may fill prescriptions through a third party, which may further reduce the number of pet owners who purchase their pet therapeutics directly from veterinarians. Such requirements may lead to increased use of generic alternatives to our products or the increased substitution of our products with other pet therapeutics or human health products if such other products are deemed to be lower-cost alternatives. Many states already have regulations requiring veterinarians to provide prescriptions to pet owners upon request and the American Veterinary Medical Association has long-standing policies in place to encourage this practice.

Over time, these and other competitive conditions may increase our reliance on Internet-based retailers, "big-box" retail stores or other over-the-counter distribution channels to sell our pet products. Any of these events could materially adversely affect our operating results and financial condition.

Consolidation of our customers could negatively affect the pricing of our products.

Veterinarians are our primary customers. In recent years, there has been a trend towards the concentration of veterinarians in large clinics and hospitals. If this trend towards consolidation continues, these customers could attempt to improve their profitability by leveraging their buying power to obtain favorable pricing. The resulting decrease in our prices could have a material adverse effect on our operating results and financial condition.

Generic products may be viewed as more cost-effective than our products.

We may face competition from products produced by other companies, including generic alternatives to any of our products. We will need to depend on patents to provide us with exclusive marketing rights for some of our products. The protection afforded, which varies from country to country, is limited by the scope and applicable terms of patents and the availability of legal remedies in the applicable country. As a result, we may face competition from lower-priced generic alternatives to many of our products. Generic competitors are becoming more aggressive in terms of pricing, and generic products are an increasing percentage of overall animal health sales in certain regions. In addition, private label products may compete with our products. If pet therapeutics customers increase their use of new or existing generic or private label products, our operating results and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.

Our pet therapeutics will be subject to unanticipated safety or efficacy concerns, which may harm our reputation.

Unanticipated safety or efficacy concerns can arise with respect to pet therapeutics, whether or not scientifically or clinically supported, leading to product recalls, withdrawals or suspended or declining sales, as well as product liability, and other claims. In addition, we depend on positive perceptions of the safety and quality of our products, and pet therapeutics generally, by our customers, veterinarians and end-users, and such concerns may harm our reputation. These concerns and the related harm to our reputation could materially adversely affect our operating results and financial condition, regardless of whether such reports are accurate.

Based on consummation of the Stock Exchange Agreement, we will own the intellectual property rights we develop with respect to Gel-Del Particles or share Gel-Del Technologies' patent rights with future collaborators.

All of the intellectual property rights that we develop with respect to Gel-Del Particles will be owned by us. However, we may face claims from non-practicing entities, which have no relevant product revenue and against whom our own patent portfolio may thus have no deterrent effect.

In addition to infringement claims against us, if third parties have prepared and filed patent applications in the United States that also claim technology to which we have rights, we may have to participate in interference proceedings in the U.S. PTO to determine the priority of invention. Third parties may also attempt to initiate reexamination, post grant review or inter parties review of our patents in the U.S. PTO. We may also become involved in similar opposition proceedings in the European Patent Office or similar offices in other jurisdictions regarding our intellectual property rights with respect to our products and technology.

If our efforts to protect the proprietary nature of the intellectual property related to any of our current or future product candidates are not adequate, we may not be able to compete effectively in our market.

We will rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality to protect the intellectual property related to our current product candidates and our development programs.

Composition-of-matter patents on the active pharmaceutical ingredient are generally considered to be the strongest form of intellectual property protection for pharmaceutical products, including pet therapeutics, as such patents provide protection without regard to any particular method of use or manufacture. Method-of-use patents protect the use of a product for the specified method. This type of patent does not prevent a competitor from making and marketing a product that is identical to our product for an indication that is outside the scope of the patented method. Moreover, even if competitors do not actively promote their product for our targeted indications, veterinarians may recommend that pet owners use these products off label, or pet owners may do so themselves. Although off-label use may infringe or contribute to the infringement of method-of-use patents, the practice is common and such infringement is difficult to prevent or prosecute. Method of manufacturing patents protect a specific way to make a product and do not prevent a third party from making the product by a different method and then using the product for our uses. We cannot be certain that the claims in our patent applications will be considered patentable by the U.S. PTO and courts in the United States, or by the patent offices and courts in foreign countries.

The strength of patents in the field of pet therapeutics involves complex legal and scientific questions and can be uncertain. The patent applications that we own or license may fail to result in issued patents in the United States or in other foreign countries. Even if the patents do successfully issue, third parties may challenge the validity, enforceability or scope thereof, which may result in such patents being narrowed, invalidated or held unenforceable. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our products or our intellectual property or prevent others from designing around our claims. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patents and patent applications we own, in-license or pursue with respect to any of our current or future product candidates is threatened, it could threaten our ability to commercialize any of our current or future product candidates. Further, if we encounter delays in our development efforts, the period of time during which we could market any of our current or future product candidates under patent protection would be reduced. Since patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing, we cannot be certain that we were the first to file any patent application related to our product candidates. Furthermore, for patent applications in which claims are entitled to a priority date before March 16, 2013, an interference proceeding can be provoked by a third party or instituted by the U.S. PTO to determine who was the first to invent any of the subject matter covered by the patent claims of our applications. For patent applications containing a claim not entitled to a priority date before March 16, 2013, there is a greater level of uncertainty in the patent law with the passage of the America Invents Act, which brings into effect significant changes to the U.S. patent laws that have yet to be well defined, and which introduces new procedures for challenging pending patent applications and issued patents. A primary change under this reform is creating a "first to file" system in the United States, which requires us to minimize the time from invention to filing of a patent application.

Even where laws provide protection, costly and time-consuming litigation could be necessary to enforce and determine the scope of our proprietary rights, and the outcome of such litigation would be uncertain. Moreover, any actions we may bring to enforce our intellectual property against our competitors could provoke them to bring counterclaims against us, and some of our competitors have substantially greater intellectual property portfolios than we have.

We will also rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and any other elements of our product development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. Although we require all of our employees to assign their inventions to us, and endeavor to execute confidentiality agreements with all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology, we cannot be certain that we have executed such agreements with all parties who may have helped to develop our intellectual property or had access to our proprietary information, nor that our agreements will not be breached. We cannot guarantee that our trade secrets and other confidential proprietary information will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. Further, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws of the United States. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in protecting and defending our intellectual property both in the United States and abroad. If we are unable to prevent material disclosure of the intellectual property related to our technologies to third parties, we will not be able to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Any disclosure to or misappropriation by third parties of our confidential proprietary information could enable competitors to quickly duplicate or surpass our technological achievements, thus eroding our competitive position in our market.

We may be involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.

Competitors may infringe our patents, or patents that may issue to us in the future, or the patents of our licensors that are licensed to us. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. In addition, if we or one of our future collaborators were to initiate legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering our current product candidates, or one of our future products, the defendant could counterclaim that our patent is invalid and/or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity and/or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the U.S. PTO, or made a materially misleading statement, during prosecution. Third parties may also raise similar claims before the U.S. PTO, even outside the context of litigation. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity and/or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on our current or future product candidates. Such a loss of patent protection could have a material adverse impact on our business.

Litigation or interference proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and other employees. Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. In addition, there could be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be unsuccessful, it could have an adverse effect on the price of our common stock. Finally, we may not be able to prevent, alone or with the support of our licensors, misappropriation of our trade secrets or confidential information, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights fully.

The regulatory approval process is uncertain, requires us to utilize significant resources, and may prevent us from obtaining approvals for the commercialization of some or all of our product candidates.

The research, testing, manufacturing, labeling, approval, selling, import, export, marketing and distribution of pet therapeutics are subject to extensive regulation by the CVM, the USDA or the EMA and other regulatory authorities in the United States and other countries, which regulations differ from country to country. We are not permitted to market any of our current or future product candidates in the United States until we receive approval of an NADA from the CVM or a product license from the USDA. We have not submitted an application for or received marketing approval for our current product candidates. Obtaining approval of an NADA from CVM or a product license from the USDA can be an uncertain process that requires us to utilize significant resources. The CVM, the USDA or any foreign regulatory bodies can delay, limit or deny approval of any of our product candidates for many reasons, including:

In addition, failure to comply with CVM and other applicable United States and foreign regulatory requirements may subject us to administrative or judicially imposed sanctions, including: warning letters, civil and criminal penalties, injunctions, withdrawal of approved products from the market, product seizure or detention, product recalls, total or partial suspension of production, and refusal to approve pending NADAs or product licenses or supplements to approved NADAs or product licenses.

Regulatory approval of an NADA or supplement NADA, or of a product license, is not guaranteed, and the approval process requires us to utilize significant resources, may take several years, and is subject to the substantial discretion of the CVM, the USDA or the EMA. Despite the time and expense exerted, failure can occur at any stage, and we could encounter problems that cause us to abandon or repeat studies, or perform additional studies. If any of our current or future product candidates fails to demonstrate safety and efficacy in our studies, or for any other reason does not gain regulatory approval, our business and results of operations will be materially and adversely harmed.

Even if we receive regulatory approval for any of our current or future product candidates, we will be subject to ongoing CVM, USDA or EMA obligations and continued regulatory review, which may result in significant additional expense. Additionally, any product candidates, if approved, will be subject to labeling and manufacturing requirements and could be subject to other restrictions. Failure to comply with these regulatory requirements or the occurrence of unanticipated problems with our products could result in significant penalties.

Any regulatory approvals that we or any of our collaborators receive for any of our current or future product candidates may be subject to conditions of approval or limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the product may be marketed, or may contain requirements for potentially costly surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. In addition, if the CVM, the USDA or the EMA approves any of our current or future product candidates, the manufacturing processes, labeling, packaging, distribution, adverse event reporting, storage, advertising, promotion and recordkeeping for the product will be subject to extensive and ongoing regulatory requirements. These requirements include submissions of safety and other post-marketing information and reports, registration, as well as continued compliance with cGMP, GLP and good clinical practices, or GCP, for any studies that we conduct post-approval. Later discovery of previously unknown problems with a product, including adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or with our third-party manufacturers or manufacturing processes, or failure to comply with regulatory requirements, may result in, among other things:

The CVM's, USDA's or the EMA's policies may change and additional government regulations may be enacted that could prevent, limit or delay regulatory approval of our product candidates. We cannot predict the likelihood, nature or extent of government regulation that may arise from future legislation or administrative action, either in the United States or abroad. If we are slow or unable to adapt to changes in existing requirements or the adoption of new requirements or policies, or if we are not able to maintain regulatory compliance, we may lose any marketing approval that we may have obtained and we may not achieve or sustain profitability, which would adversely affect our business.

Failure to obtain regulatory approvals in foreign jurisdictions for our product candidates would prevent us from marketing our products internationally.

In order to market any product outside of the United States, including in the EEA (which is comprised of the 28 member states of the European Union plus Norway, Iceland and Liechtenstein) and many other foreign jurisdictions, separate regulatory approvals are required. More concretely, in the EEA, pet therapeutics can only be commercialized after obtaining a Marketing Authorization ("MA"). Before granting the MA, the EMA or the competent national authorities of the member states of the EEA make an assessment of the risk-benefit balance of the product on the basis of scientific criteria concerning its quality, safety and efficacy.

The approval procedures vary among countries and can involve additional studies and testing, and the time required to obtain approval may differ from that required to obtain CVM or USDA approval. Animal studies conducted in one country may not be accepted by regulatory authorities in other countries. Approval by the CVM or USDA does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries, and approval by one or more foreign regulatory authorities does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other foreign countries or by the CVM or the USDA. However, a failure or delay in obtaining regulatory approval in one country may have a negative effect on the regulatory process in others. The foreign regulatory approval process may include all of the risks associated with obtaining CVM or USDA approval. We may not be able to file for regulatory approvals or to do so on a timely basis and, even if we do file them, we may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our products in any market.

If approved, any of our current or future products may cause or contribute to adverse medical events that we are required to report to the CVM, USDA and regulatory authorities in other countries and, if we fail to do so, we could be subject to sanctions that would materially harm our business.

If we are successful in commercializing any of our current or future products, regulations of the CVM, the USDA and of the regulatory authorities in other countries require that we report certain information about adverse medical events if those products may have caused or contributed to those adverse events. The timing of our obligation to report would be triggered by the date we become aware of the adverse event as well as the nature of the event. We may fail to report adverse events we become aware of within the prescribed timeframe. We may also fail to appreciate that we have become aware of a reportable adverse event, especially if it is not reported to us as an adverse event or if it is an adverse event that is unexpected or removed in time from the use of our products. If we fail to comply with our reporting obligations, the CVM, USDA and regulatory authorities in other countries could take action including criminal prosecution, the imposition of civil monetary penalties, seizure of our products, or delay in approval or clearance of future products.

Legislative or regulatory reforms with respect to pet therapeutics may make it more difficult and costly for us to obtain regulatory clearance or approval of any of our current or future product candidates and to produce, market, and distribute our products after clearance or approval is obtained.

From time to time, legislation is drafted and introduced in the U.S. Congress that could significantly change the statutory provisions governing the testing, regulatory clearance or approval, manufacture, and marketing of regulated products. In addition, CVM and USDA regulations and guidance are often revised or reinterpreted by the CVM and USDA in ways that may significantly affect our business and our products. Similar changes in laws or regulations can occur in other countries. Any new regulations or revisions or reinterpretations of existing regulations in the United States or in other countries may impose additional costs or lengthen review times of any of our current or future product candidates. We cannot determine what effect changes in regulations, statutes, legal interpretation or policies, when and if promulgated, enacted or adopted may have on our business in the future. Such changes could, among other things, require:

Each of these would likely entail substantial time and cost and could materially harm our financial results. In addition, delays in receipt of or failure to receive regulatory clearances or approvals for any future products would harm our business, financial condition, and results of operations.

Our research and development relies on evaluations in animals, which may become subject to bans or additional regulations.

As a biopharmaceutical company with a focus on pet therapeutics, the evaluation of our existing and new products in animals is required to register our products. Animal testing in certain industries has been the subject of controversy and adverse publicity. Some organizations and individuals have attempted to ban animal testing or encourage the adoption of additional regulations applicable to animal testing. To the extent that the activities of such organizations and individuals are successful, our research and development, and by extension our operating results and financial condition, could be materially adversely affected. In addition, negative publicity about us or our industry could harm our reputation.

RISKS RELATED TO OUR COMMON STOCK

Our ability to raise additional capital through the sale of our stock may be harmed by competing resales of our common stock by the selling shareholders in our registration statement that was declared effective by the SEC.

The price of our common stock could fall if the selling shareholders sell substantial amounts of our common stock. These sales would make it more difficult for us to sell equity or equity-related securities in the future at a time and price that we deem appropriate, because the selling shareholders may offer to sell their shares of common stock to potential investors for less than we do. Moreover, potential investors may not be interested in purchasing shares of our common stock if the selling shareholders are selling their shares of common stock.

We depend on the efforts and abilities of our officers.

We currently have four officers and directors who are also our only employees. The demands on each of these individuals' time will increase because of our status as a public company. Our officers and directors have limited experience in managing a public company, which may impact our ability to meet our financial and business objectives as potential investors may not want to invest in a company whose management has limited public company experience. The interruption of the services of our management could significantly hinder our operations, profits and future development, if suitable replacements are not promptly obtained. We do not currently have any executive compensation agreements. We cannot guaranty that our management will remain with us.

Our management ranks are thin, and losing or failing to add key personnel could affect our ability to successfully grow our business.

Our future performance depends substantially on the continued service of our management. In particular, our success depends upon the continued efforts of our management personnel, including our Chief Executive Officer, John Lai, and our Chief Financial Officer/Treasurer and Secretary, John F. Dolan. We cannot guarantee that either Messrs. Lai or Dolan will remain with us.

The costs to meet our reporting requirements as a public company subject to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 will be substantial and may result in us having insufficient funds to operate our business.

We will incur ongoing expenses associated with professional fees for accounting and legal expenses associated with being a public company. We estimate that these costs will range up to $50,000 per year for the next few years. Those fees will be higher if our business volume and activity increases. Those obligations will reduce and possibly eliminate our ability and resources to fund our operations and may prevent us from meeting our normal business obligations.

Our auditors have questioned our ability to continue operations as a "going concern." Investors may lose all of their investment if we are unable to continue operations and generate revenues.

We hope to obtain significant revenues from future product sales. In the absence of significant sales and profits, we may seek to raise additional funds to meet our working capital needs, principally through the additional sales of our securities. However, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain sufficient additional funds when needed, or that such funds, if available, will be obtainable on terms satisfactory to us. As a result, substantial doubt exists about our ability to continue as a going concern.

We are subject to the Section 15(d) reporting requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 which does not require a company to file all the same reports and information as a fully reporting company pursuant to Section 12.

We are subject to the Section 15(d) reporting requirements according to the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or Exchange Act. As a filer subject to Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act:

Our officers and directors own approximately 56.51% of our outstanding shares of common stock, allowing these shareholders to control matters requiring approval of our shareholders.

Our officers and directors beneficially own, in the aggregate, approximately 74.56% of our outstanding shares of common stock. Such concentrated control of the company may negatively affect the price of our common stock. In addition, our officers and directors can control matters requiring approval by our security holders, including the election of directors.

Investors should not look to dividends as a source of income.

In the interest of reinvesting initial profits back into our business, we do not intend to pay cash dividends in the foreseeable future. Consequently, any economic return will initially be derived, if at all, from appreciation in the fair market value of our stock, and not as a result of dividend payments.

The trading price of our common stock on the OTCQB will fluctuate significantly and stockholders may have difficulty reselling their shares.

Our common stock commenced trading on the OTCQB approximately January 1, 2013. As of the date of this Annual Report, our common stock trades on the OTCQB. There is a volatility associated with OTCQB securities in general and the value of your investment could decline due to the impact of any of the following factors upon the market price of our common stock: (i) disappointing results from our exploration or development efforts; (ii) failure to meet our revenue or profit goals or operating budget; (iii) decline in demand for our common stock; (iv) downward revisions in securities analysts' estimates or changes in general market conditions; (v) technological innovations by competitors or in competing technologies; (vi) lack of funding generated for operations; (vii) investor perception of our industry or our prospects; and (viii) general economic trends.

In addition, stock markets have experienced price and volume fluctuations and the market prices of securities have been highly volatile. These fluctuations are often unrelated to operating performance and may adversely affect the market price of our common stock. As a result, investors may be unable to sell their shares at a fair price and you may lose all or part of your investment.

Additional issuance of equity securities may result in dilution to our existing stockholders.

Our Articles of Incorporation, as amended, authorize the issuance of 250,000,000 shares of common stock. The Board of Directors has the authority to issue additional shares of our capital stock to provide additional financing in the future, including the issuances to Gel-Del Technologies in accordance with the Stock Exchange Agreement, and the issuance of any such shares may result in a reduction of the book value or market price of the then outstanding shares of our common stock. Based upon the issuance of the 4,150,000 shares of common stock to the Gel-Del Shareholders and if we do issue any such additional shares in the future, such issuance also will cause a reduction in the proportionate ownership and voting power of all other stockholders. As a result of such dilution, the proportionate ownership interest and voting power of our shareholders will be decreased accordingly. Further, although the share issuances under the Stock Exchange Agreement did not result in a change of control, any such future issuances could result in a change of control.

Because we may be subject to the "penny stock" rules, the level of trading activity in our stock may be reduced - which may make it difficult for investors to sell their shares.

Broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in "penny stocks" are regulated by certain penny stock rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission. Penny stocks, like shares of our common stock, generally are equity securities with a price of less than $5.00, other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on NASDAQ. The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from the rules, to deliver a standardized risk disclosure document that provides information about penny stocks and the nature and level of risks in the penny stock market. The broker-dealer also must provide the customer with current bid and offer quotations for the penny stock, the compensation of the broker-dealer and its salesperson in the transaction, and, if the broker-dealer is the sole market maker, the broker-dealer must disclose this fact and the broker-dealer's presumed control over the market, and monthly account statements showing the market value of each penny stock held in the customer's account. In addition, broker-dealers who sell these securities to persons other than established customers and "accredited investors" must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written agreement to the transaction. Consequently, these requirements may have the effect of reducing the level of trading activity, if any, in the secondary market for a security subject to the penny stock rules, and investors in our common stock may find it difficult to sell their shares.

Our shares are eligible to be traded electronically.

Our shares of common stock are eligible to be quoted on the OTCQB. Our shares are eligible with Depository Trust Company (DTC) to trade electronically. Because we are DTC eligible, our shares can be electronically transferred between brokerage accounts. The practical effect may be that our shares will trade at a higher volume on the OTCQB, however, there is no guarantee.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS

We are currently responding to that certain comment letter from the Securities and Exchange Commission regarding our Information Statement on Form 14C. We filed a preliminary statement on Form 14C with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 22, 2015 and will be filing a subsequent amendment to include the audited financial statements for fiscal year ended March 31, 2016. We anticipate clearing comments with the Securities and Exchange Commission by August 31, 2016 and subsequently mailing to our shareholders of record and nobo shareholders the Definitive Information Statement.

ITEM 2. PROPERTIES

Property held by us. As of August 1, 2016, we do not own any interests in real estate. 

Our Facilities. Our executive, administrative and operating offices are located at 12100 Singletree Lane, Suite 186, Eden Prairie, Minnesota 55344. We believe that our facilities are adequate for our needs and that additional suitable space will be available on acceptable terms as required.

Gel-Del Facilities. In accordance with the Stock Exchange Agreement, we will have acquired the offices of Gel-Del. The offices are located at 1000 Westgate Drive, St. Paul, Minnesota 55114.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not currently a party to any legal proceedings.

ITEM 4. MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

Not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR REGISTRANT'S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

MARKET INFORMATION

Our common stock is listed for quotation on the OTCQB under the symbol "PETV." Our shares commenced trading approximately January 1, 2013. The following table sets forth the high and low bid prices relating to our common stock on a quarterly basis for the periods indicated as quoted by the OTC:QB stock market. These quotations reflect inter-dealer prices without retail mark-up, mark-down, or commissions, and may not reflect actual transactions.

HOLDERS

The approximate number of stockholders of record at August 3, 2016 was 81. The number of stockholders of record does not include beneficial owners of our common stock, whose shares are held in the names of various dealers, clearing agencies, banks, brokers and other fiduciaries.

DIVIDEND POLICY

We have never declared or paid a cash dividend on our capital stock. We do not expect to pay cash dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future. We currently intend to retain our earnings, if any, for use in our business. Any dividends declared in the future will be at the discretion of our Board of Directors.

SUBMISSISION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

April 22, 2015 Information Statement

On April 10, 2015, our Board of Directors and majority shareholders, believing it to be in our best interests and of our shareholders: (i) approved the completion of our acquisition of Gel-Del incident to a Plan of Exchange to be filed with the Secretary of State of Nevada (the "Plan of Exchange"), pursuant to which Gel-Del becomes our wholly-owned subsidiary; and (ii) ratified the appointment by the Board of Directors of two new directors, Dr. David B. Masters and Randall A. Meyer ("Ratification of Appointment of New Directors").

The Information Statement will be furnished to our shareholders of record as of April 10, 2015 in connection with actions taken by written consent of holders of a substantial majority of our outstanding common shares. These corporate actions consist of (i) approving and adopting the acquisition of Gel-Del through a Plan of Exchange (the "Plan of Exchange"), pursuant to which Gel-Del becomes our wholly-owned subsidiary; and (ii) ratifying the appointment by our Board of Directors of two new directors (the "Ratification of New Directors").

On April 10, 2015, we obtained the approval of the Plan of Exchange and the Ratification of Appointment of New Directors by written consent of our stockholders that are the record holders of 6,672,653 shares of common stock, which represents an aggregate 88.66 % of the voting power of as of the record date of April 10, 2015. The Plan of Exchange and the Ratification of New Directors will not become effective until at least twenty (20) days after the mailing of this Information Statement to our shareholders and the filing of the Plan of Exchange with the Secretary of State of Nevada. The names of the shareholders of record who hold in the aggregate a majority of our total issued and outstanding common stock and who signed the written consent of stockholders are: (i) John Lai holding of record 3,557,939 shares of common stock (46.21%); (ii) John F. Dolan holding of record 843,894 shares of common stock (1 0.96 %); (iii) Dr. David B. Masters holding of record 1,460,645 shares of common stock ( 18.97 %); and (iv) Randall Meyer holding of record 810,175 shares of common stock ( 10.52 %).

As of the date of this Annual Report, we are responding to comment from the Securities and Exchange Commission, which pertained to inclusion of our audited financial statements for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. Therefore, we will simultaneously be filing an amendment to the Information Statement containing our audited financial statements for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 and the date on which this Information Statement will be sent to our shareholders will be on or about April 30, 2016. See "Item 1A. Unresolved SEC Comments."

All members of our Board of Directors have approved the Plan of Exchange with Gel-Del and the appointment of our two new directors and shareholders owning a substantial majority of our outstanding common stock have approved these two proposed corporate actions. No other votes or consents are required or necessary.

RECENT SALES OF UNREGISTREED SECURITIES

During fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 and to date, we issued an aggregate of 70,500 post-Reverse Stock Split shares of unregistered common stock as follows:

Settlement of Debt

On April 10, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized the issuance of an aggregate 70,500 shares of our post-Reverse Stock Split shares of restricted common stock to two of our executive officers and directors as settlement for amounts due and owing for past services and associated benefits. The issuance of shares was as follows: (i) 43,000 shares of common stock at $4.00 per share to Dr. David B. Masters, our President, Chief Technical Officer and member of the Board of Directors, as settlement for $172,000; and (ii) 27,500 shares of common stock at $4.00 per share to Randall A. Meyer. our Chief Operating Officer and member of the Board of Directors. See "Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters".

The shares of common stock were issued to the two United States residents in reliance on Section 4(2) of the Act. The shares of common stock have not been registered under the Act or under any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold without registration with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements. Each individual acknowledged that the securities to be issued have not been registered under the Securities Act, that they understood the economic risk of an investment in the securities, and that they had the opportunity to ask questions of and receive answers from the Company's management concerning any and all matters related to acquisition of the securities.

Settlement of Note Holder Debt

Effective March 31, 2016, we entered into six debt settlement agreements with creditors holding outstanding notes, which resulted in the Company converting all of the $1,576,649 outstanding matured debt owed to the note holders by us into equity in the form of common stock of PetVivo. These debt conversions included all principal, accrued interest and any other expenses relating to these notes, including $655,919 owed to Gemini Master Fund, Ltd., $509,088 owed to St. George Investments LLC, $154,500 owed to Carebourn Capital, L.P., $125,892 owed to Jeanne Rudelius, $78,750 owed to Scott Johnson, and $52,500 owed to Union Capital LLC.

The foregoing conversions were all accomplished based on a conversion price of $2.00 per common share, and accordingly our Board of Directors authorized the issuance of an aggregate of 788,325 shares of our common stock to be issued to the six note holders in complete satisfaction of all debt obligations held by them under their respective notes.

We regard these substantial and material debt-to-equity conversions to be a significant benefit to our current financial position and balance sheet, as well as to our future ability to finance the planned operations and projected commercial growth of our business.

Concurrent with its conversion of indebtedness to Gemini Master Fund, Ltd. ("Gemini"); Gemini also exercised a warrant held by Gemini incident to their note. This warrant exercise was a "cashless" transaction by Gemini, and resulted in our issuance to Gemini of an additional 97,317 shares of our common stock.

All of the foregoing securities issuances were unregistered and made by PetVivo as non-public transactions. The shares of common stock were issued to six United States residents in reliance on Section 4(a)(2) and Regulation D promulgated under the United States Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the "Securities Act"). The securities have not been registered under the Securities Act or under any state securities laws and may not be offered or sold without registration with the United States Securities and Exchange Commission or an applicable exemption from the registration requirements. The note holders each acknowledged that the securities to be issued have not been registered under the Securities Act, that they understood the economic risk of an investment in the securities, and that they had the opportunity to ask questions of and receive answers from our management concerning any and all matters related to acquisition of the securities.

SECURITIES AUTHORIZED FOR ISSUANCE UNDER EQUITY COMPENSATION PLANS.

As of the date of this Annual Report, we have no compensation plans under which our equity securities were authorized for issuance.

PENNY STOCK REGULATION

Shares of our common stock will probably be subject to rules adopted the SEC that regulate broker-dealer practices in connection with transactions in "penny stocks." Penny stocks are generally equity securities with a price of less than $5.00 (other than securities registered on certain national securities exchanges or quoted on the NASDAQ system, provided that current price and volume information with respect to transactions in those securities is provided by the exchange or system). The penny stock rules require a broker-dealer, prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, deliver a standardized risk disclosure document prepared by the SEC, which contains the following:

Prior to effecting any transaction in penny stock, the broker-dealer also must provide the customer the following:

In addition, the penny stock rules require that prior to a transaction in a penny stock not otherwise exempt from those rules, the broker-dealer must make a special written determination that the penny stock is a suitable investment for the purchaser and receive the purchaser's written acknowledgment of the receipt of a risk disclosure statement, a written agreement to transactions involving penny stocks, and a signed and dated copy of a written suitability statement. These disclosure requirements may have the effect of reducing the trading activity in the secondary market for a stock that becomes subject to the penny stock rules. Holders of shares of our common stock may have difficulty selling those shares because our common stock will probably be subject to the penny stock rules.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not applicable.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT'S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with our financial statements for the year ended March 31, 2016, together with notes thereto as included in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this Annual Report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors." Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

We are a developmental stage company and have not generated any revenue to date. We have incurred recurring losses to date. Our financial statements have been prepared assuming that we will continue as a going concern and, accordingly, do not include adjustments relating to the recoverability and realization of assets and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue in operation.

We expect we will require additional capital to meet our long term operating requirements. We expect to raise additional capital through, among other things, the sale of equity or debt securities.

RESULTS OF OPERATION

For Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016 Compared to Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2015

Total Revenues. For fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, we earned $75,000 in revenue compared to $-0- earned in revenue during fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 (an increase of $75,000).

Operating Expenses. Operating expenses for fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 were $3,326,181 compared to $1,210,857 for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 (an increase of $2,115,324). For fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, our operating expenses consisted of: (i) $70,761 (2015: $4,396) in research and development; and (ii) $3,255,420 (2015: $1,197,461) in general and administrative. During fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, our general and administrative expenses consisted of: (i) licensing costs of $488,000 (2015: $-0-); (ii) compensation of $215,335 (2015: $90,000); and (iii) professional fees of $47,874 (2015: $26,550). General and administrative expenses generally include corporate overhead, financial and administrative contracted services, marketing, and consulting costs.

Operating expenses increased due to an increase in: (i) licensing costs of $488,000; (ii) compensation of $125,333; iii) amortization & depreciation 743,631; and (iv) professional fees of $21,324.

Thus, our operating loss for fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 was $3,251,183 compared to an operating loss of $1,201,857 for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

Other Income (Expenses). Other expenses for fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 were $1,479,614 (2015: ($363,835). Other expenses consisted of: (i) loss on settlement of debt of $382,296 (2015: $35,326; (ii) change in fair value of derivatives of $165,444 (2015: $-0-); (iii) interest of $270,582 (2015: $399,161); and (iv) amortization of issue costs of $992,180 (2015: $-0-).

Net Loss before Taxes. Therefore, our net loss before taxes for fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 was ($4,730,797) as compared to ($1,565,692) for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015. Net loss generally increased primarily due to the recording during fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 of: (i) amortization of issue costs of $992,180; (ii) loss on settlement of debt of $382,296); and (iii) change in fair value of derivatives of $165,444.

Interest. During fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, we incurred $270,582 in interest as compared to $379,161 in interest incurred during fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

Net Loss Attributable to PetVivo. Therefore, our net loss attributable to PetVivo for fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 was ($3,651,174) or $0.46) per share compared to a net loss attributable to PetVivo for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 of ($1,565,692) or ($0.21) per share. The weighted average number of shares outstanding during fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 was 7,853,862 compared to 7,609,445 for fiscal year ended March 31, 2015.

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Fiscal Year Ended March 31, 2016

As of March 31, 2016, our current assets were $35,279 and our current liabilities were $1,478,906, which resulted in a working capital deficit of $1,443,627.

As of March 31, 2016, our current assets were comprised of: (i) $258 in cash and cash equivalents; (ii) $15,900 in employee advance; and (iii) $19,121 in prepaid expenses. As of March 31, 2016, our total assets were $16,689,444 comprised of: (i) current assets of $35,292; (ii) $809 in property and equipment (valued at $103,504 less depreciation of $102,695); (iii) goodwill valued at $13,407,693; and (iv) trademark and patent – net valued at $3,245,662.

As of March 31, 2016, our current liabilities were comprised of: (i) $1,063,538 in accounts payable and accrued expenses; (ii) $193,370 in notes payable and accrued interest – related party; (iii) notes payable of $165,849; and (iv) convertible notes payable of $35,000 net of discount $3,311).

Stockholders' equity decreased from $161,255 as at March 31, 2015 to $139,998 as at March 31, 2016.

Cash Flows from Operating Activities. We have not generated positive cash flows from operating activities due to a lack of a source of revenues. For the fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, net cash flows used in operating activities was $260,961 (2015: $398,475). Net cash flows used in operating activities during fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 consisted primarily of a net loss of $4,780,797 (2015: $1,565,692), which was adjusted by: (i) $555,250 (2015: $1,030,031) in stock issued for services; (ii) $282,000 (2015: $-0-) in stock issued to settle liabilities; iii) $743,631 (2015: $-0-) in depreciation and amortization; (iv) $992,180 (2015: $-0-) in amortization of debt issue costs; (v) ($165,444) (2015: $-0-) in derivative loss adjustment; (v) $382,296 (2015: $-0-) in forgiveness of debt; and (vi) $488,000 (2015: $-0-) in license.

Net cash flows used in operating activities during fiscal year ended March 31, 2016 was further changed by: (i) a decrease in prepaid expenses of $215,500 (2015: $155,500); ii) increase in employee advances ($15,900) (2015: $-0-); and (iii) an increase in accounts payable and accrued expenses of $562,954 (2015: ($18,314).

Cash Flows from Investing Activities. For fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, net cash flows used by investing activities was $-0- compared to net cash flows used by investing activities during fiscal year ended March 31, 2015 of $388,000 consisting of change in assets.

Cash Flows from Financing Activities. We have financed our operations primarily from debt or the issuance of equity instruments. For fiscal year ended March 31, 2016, net cash flows provided from financing activities was $635,243 (2015: $787,000) consisting of: (i) $137,105 (2015: $-0-) in proceeds from stock; (ii) $524,750 (2015: $898,000) in proceeds from convertible notes; (iii) $193,370 (2015: $-0-) in proceeds from loans, which was offset by ($204,500) (2015: ($111,000) in repayments. 

MATERIAL COMMITMENTS

Accrued Salary

We are indebted to related parties. At March 31, 2016, we are obligated for unpaid officer salaries and advances of $109,818. This amount is included in accounts payable and accrued expenses.

Notes Payable

We are obligated on the following notes: (i) third party individual in the amount of $55,326; (ii) bank line credit of $72,743; and (iii) $25,654 due to us net of discount of $3,311.

We have a bank credit line available up to $75,000. As of March 31, 2016, there was $2,257 available due upon demand. Interest is at 6.25%. We are also indebted on a note bearing interest at prime plus 2 % to a corporation with a monthly payment of $2,938.

PURCHASE OF SIGNIFICANT EQUIPMENT

We do not intend to purchase any significant equipment during the next twelve months.

OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS

As of the date of this Annual Report, we do not have any off balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to investors.

GOING CONCERN

The independent auditors' report accompanying our March 31, 2016 financial statements contains an explanatory paragraph expressing substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements have been prepared "assuming that we will continue as a going concern," which contemplates that we will realize our assets and satisfy our liabilities and commitments in the ordinary course of business. We have suffered recurring losses from operations, have a working capital deficit and are currently in default of the payment terms of certain note agreements. These factors raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.

RECENTLY ISSUED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS

The following describes the recently issued accounting standards used in reporting our financial condition and results of operations. In some cases, accounting standards allow more than one alternative accounting method for reporting. In those cases, our reported results of operations would be different should we employ an alternative accounting method.

In June 2014, FASB issued Accounting Standards Update ("ASU") No. 2014-12, "Compensation – Stock Compensation Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period". The amendments in this ASU apply to all reporting entities that grant their employees share-based payments in which the terms of the award provide that a performance target that affects vesting could be achieved after the requisite service period. The amendments require that a performance target that affects vesting and that could be achieved after the requisite service period be treated as a performance condition. A reporting entity should apply existing guidance in Topic 718 as it relates to awards with performance conditions that affect vesting to account for such awards. For all entities, the amendments in this ASU are effective for annual periods and interim periods within those annual periods beginning after December 15, 2015. Earlier adoption is permitted. Entities may apply the amendments in this ASU either (a) prospectively to all awards granted or modified after the effective date or (b) retrospectively to all awards with performance targets that are outstanding as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements and to all new or modified awards thereafter. If retrospective transition is adopted, the cumulative effect of applying this Update as of the beginning of the earliest annual period presented in the financial statements should be recognized as an adjustment to the opening retained earnings balance at that date. Additionally, if retrospective transition is adopted, an entity may use hindsight in measuring and recognizing the compensation cost. This updated guidance is not expected to have a material impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition. We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

In August 2014, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update "ASU" 2014-15 on "Presentation of Financial Statements Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40) – Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity's Ability to Continue as a Going Concern". Currently, there is no guidance in U.S. GAAP about management's responsibility to evaluate whether there is substantial doubt about an entity's ability to continue as a going concern or to provide related footnote disclosures. The amendments in this Update provide that guidance. In doing so, the amendments are intended to reduce diversity in the timing and content of footnote disclosures. The amendments require management to assess an entity's ability to continue as a going concern by incorporating and expanding upon certain principles that are currently in U.S. auditing standards. Specifically, the amendments (1) provide a definition of the term substantial doubt, (2) require an evaluation every reporting period including interim periods, (3) provide principles for considering the mitigating effect of management's plans, (4) require certain disclosures when substantial doubt is alleviated as a result of consideration of management's plans, (5) require an express statement and other disclosures when substantial doubt is not alleviated, and (6) require an assessment for a period of one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or available to be issued). We are currently reviewing the provisions of this ASU to determine if there will be any impact on our results of operations, cash flows or financial condition.

All other newly issued accounting pronouncements but not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.

IITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not applicable.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

The financial statements required by Item 8 are presented in the following order:

PetVivo Holdings, Inc.

Consolidated Financial Statements

March 31, 2016 and 2015

TABLE OF CONTENTS

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Stockholders and

Board of Directors Petvivo Holdings, Inc.

I have audited the accompanying balance sheet of Petvivo Holdings, Inc., as of March 31, 2016 and 2015 and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity and cash flows for the two years in the period March 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. My responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

I conducted my audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that I plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor was I engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. My audit included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company's internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, I express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. I believe that my audit provide a reasonable basis for my opinion.

In my opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Petvivo Holdings, Inc., as of March 31, 2016 and results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the two years in the period ended March 31, 2016, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying consolidated financials have been prepared assuming the Company will continue as a going concern. As of March 31, 2016, the Company had accumulated losses of $29,879,280 and a working capital deficit of $1,443,627. These matters raise substantial doubt about the Company's ability to continue as a going concern. These factors, and Company's plans are discussed in Note 5.

Patrick D. Heyn. CPA, P. A.

Atlantis, Florida

August 17, 2016

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.