PGT Innovations, Inc. - Quarter Report: 2016 July (Form 10-Q)

Table of Contents

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-Q

For the quarterly period ended July 2, 2016

OR

For the transition period from                      to                     

Commission file number 000-52059

PGT, Inc.

1070 Technology Drive

North Venice, FL 34275

Registrant’s telephone number: 941-480-1600

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes  x    No  ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).    Yes  x    No  ¨*

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of accelerated filer and large accelerated filer in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes  ¨    No  x

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date.

Common Stock, $0.01 par value, 48,945,966 shares, as of August 3, 2016.

Table of Contents

PGT, INC.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

Form 10-Q for the Three and Six Months Ended July 2, 2016

2

Table of Contents

PART I — FINANCIAL INFORMATION

PGT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

3

Table of Contents

PGT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(in thousands, except per share amounts)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

4

Table of Contents

PGT, INC.

CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

(in thousands)

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these condensed consolidated financial statements.

5

Table of Contents

PGT, INC.

NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

(unaudited)

NOTE 1. BASIS OF PRESENTATION

The accompanying unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PGT, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiary, PGT Industries, Inc., and its wholly-owned subsidiaries CGI Window and Holdings, Inc. (“CGI”), and WinDoor, Incorporated (collectively the “Company”), after elimination of intercompany accounts and transactions. Through PGT Industries, Inc., we purchased all of the issued and outstanding shares of common stock of WinDoor, Incorporated, a Florida corporation, and all of the issued and outstanding membership units of LTE, LLC, a Florida limited liability company (together with WinDoor Incorporated, “WinDoor”) effective on February 16, 2016 pursuant to a stock purchase agreement (“SPA”) by and among PGT Industries, Inc., and the sellers as identified in the SPA. As a result of the SPA, WinDoor became a wholly-owned subsidiary of PGT Industries, Inc. The fair value of consideration transferred in the acquisition was $103.3 million, including the estimated fair value of contingent consideration of $3.0 million, which has been preliminarily allocated to the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date, in accordance with Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 805, “Business Combinations”. For a more detailed discussion of this acquisition, see Note 6 herein.

These condensed consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with the instructions to Form 10-Q and do not include all of the information and footnotes required by United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“GAAP”) for complete financial statements. In the opinion of management, all adjustments (consisting only of normal recurring adjustments) considered necessary for a fair presentation have been included. Operating results for the interim periods are not necessarily indicative of the results that may be expected for the remainder of the current year or for any future periods. Each of our Company’s fiscal quarters ended July 2, 2016, and July 4, 2015, consisted of 13 weeks.

The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 2, 2016, is derived from the audited consolidated financial statements, but does not include all disclosures required by GAAP. The condensed consolidated balance sheet as of January 2, 2016, and the unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements as of and for the periods ended July 2, 2016, should be read in conjunction with the more detailed audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended January 2, 2016, included in the Company’s most recent Annual Report on Form 10-K. Accounting policies used in the preparation of these unaudited condensed consolidated financial statements are consistent with the accounting policies described in the Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements included in the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K.

Recently Adopted Accounting Pronouncements

In September 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-16, “Business Combinations (Topic 805) – Simplifying the Accounting for Measurement-Period Adjustments”. This guidance eliminates the requirement to revise prior period financial statements for measurement period adjustments in a business combination. This guidance requires that the cumulative impact of a measurement-period adjustment (including the impact on prior periods) be recognized in the reporting period in which the adjustment is identified. This ASU was effective for the Company on January 3, 2016. The adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on our financial statements.

In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs,” (ASU 2015-03) which will require debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability to be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of that debt liability, consistent with debt discounts (“original issue discount” or “OID”). The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs are not affected by the amendments in this ASU. This ASU is effective in financial statements issued for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015. In August 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-15, “Interest – Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Presentation and Subsequent Measurement of Debt Issuance Costs Associated with Line-of-Credit Arrangements - Amendments to SEC Paragraphs Pursuant to Staff Announcement at June 18, 2015 EITF Meeting,” which amends Subtopic 835-30 to add SEC paragraphs pursuant to the SEC Staff Announcement at the June 18, 2015 Emerging Issues Task Force (EITF) meeting about the presentation and subsequent measurement of debt issuance costs associated with line-of-credit arrangements, regarding the SECs views of the classification of debt issuance costs relating to line-of-credit arrangements as deferred assets when no borrowings exist under the arrangement. We retrospectively adopted ASU 2015-03 in the interim period ended April 2, 2016, with respect to all deferred financing costs, lender fees and original issue discount, including those associated with the revolving credit portion of the 2016 Credit Agreement (see Note 8). The effect of this change did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial condition. The effects on the Company’s consolidated balance sheet as of January 2, 2016 relating to the reclassification of deferred financing costs is as follows (in thousands):

6

Table of Contents

In June 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU No. 2014-12, Compensation—Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Accounting for Share-Based Payments When the Terms of an Award Provide That a Performance Target Could Be Achieved after the Requisite Service Period (a consensus of the FASB Emerging Issues Task Force). The new standard requires that a performance target that affects vesting, and that could be achieved after the requisite service period, be treated as a performance condition. As such, the performance target should not be reflected in estimating the grant date fair value of the award. The update further clarifies that compensation cost should be recognized in the period in which it becomes probable that the performance target will be achieved and should represent the compensation cost attributable to the periods for which the requisite service has already been rendered. We prospectively adopted ASU 2014-12 in the first quarter ended April 2, 2016. The adoption of this ASU did not have an impact on our consolidated financial statements.

Recently Issued Accounting Pronouncements

In addition to the pronouncements presented below, see Note 3 to the consolidated financial statements included in our recently filed Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2016.

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. ASU 2016-13 amends the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the currently used incurred loss methodology, which will result in the more timely recognition of losses. This update is effective for our fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2016-13 also applies to employee benefit plan accounting, with an effective date of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on our consolidated financial statements, footnote disclosures and employee benefit plan accounting.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. ASU 2016-12 clarifies certain core recognition principles including collectability, sales tax presentation, noncash consideration, contract modifications and completed contracts at transition and disclosures no longer required if the full retrospective transition method is adopted. This new standard has the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU 2014-09, which is the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which contains amendments to the new revenue recognition standard on identifying performance obligations and accounting for licenses of intellectual property, addressing issues raised by stakeholders and discussed by the Transition Resource Group. The amendments related to identifying performance obligations clarify when a promised good or service is separately identifiable and allows entities to disregard items that are immaterial in the context of a contract. The licensing implementation amendments clarify how an entity should evaluate the nature of its promise in granting a license of intellectual property, which will determine whether revenue is recognized over time or at a point in time. This new standard has the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU 2014-09, which is the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

7

Table of Contents

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation—Stock Compensation, Improvements to Employee Share-Based payment Accounting (Topic 718)”. This update is intended to provide simplification of the accounting for share based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” which is an amendment to the new revenue recognition standard on assessing whether an entity is a principal or an agent in a revenue transaction. This amendment addresses implementation issues that were discussed by the Revenue Recognition TRG to clarify the principal versus agent assessment and lead to more consistent application. This new standard has the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU 2014-09, which is the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. This guidance supersedes the existing guidance for lease accounting, Leases (Topic 840). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize leases on their balance sheets, and leaves lessor accounting largely unchanged. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for all entities. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to elect to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements.

NOTE 2. WARRANTY

Most of our manufactured products are sold with warranties. Warranty periods, which vary by product components, generally range from 1 to 10 years; however, the warranty period for a limited number of specifically identified components in certain applications is a lifetime. The majority of the products sold have warranties on components which range from 1 to 3 years. The reserve for warranties is based on management’s assessment of the cost per service call and the number of service calls expected to be incurred to satisfy warranty obligations on the current net sales.

During the three months ended July 2, 2016, we recorded warranty expense at a rate of approximately 2.44% of sales. This rate is slightly higher, but in line with the 2.32% of sales accrued in the first quarter of 2016.

The following table summarizes: current period charges, adjustments to previous estimates, if necessary, as well as settlements, which represent actual costs incurred during the period for the three and six months ended July 2, 2016, and July 4, 2015. The reserve is determined through specific identification and assessing Company history. Expected future obligations are discounted to a current value using a risk-free rate for obligations with similar maturities.

8

Table of Contents

The following provides information with respect to our warranty accrual:

NOTE 3. INVENTORIES

Inventories consist principally of raw materials purchased for the manufacture of our products. We have limited finished goods inventory since all products are custom, made-to-order and usually ship upon completion. Finished goods inventory costs include direct materials, direct labor, and overhead. All inventories are stated at the lower of cost (first-in, first-out method) or net realizable value. Inventories consisted of the following:

NOTE 4. STOCK BASED-COMPENSATION

Exercises

For the three months ended July 2, 2016, there were 31,200 options exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $2.15 per share. For the six months ended July 2, 2016, there were 123,081 options exercised at a weighted average exercise price of $1.23 per share.

Issuance

On March 3, 2016, we granted 251,370 restricted stock awards to certain executives and non-executive employees of the Company. The restrictions on these stock awards lapse over time based solely on continued service. However, the quantity of restricted shares granted on half of these shares, or 125,685 shares, is fixed, whereas the quantity granted on the remaining half, or 125,685 shares, is subject to Company-specific performance criteria. The restricted stock awards have a fair value on date of grant of $9.23 per share based on the closing NASDAQ market price of the common stock on the day prior to the day the awards were granted. Those restricted shares whose quantity is fixed vest in equal amounts over a three-year period on the first, second and third anniversary dates of the grant. Those restricted shares whose quantity is subject to Company performance criteria vest in equal amounts over a two-year period on the second and third anniversary dates of the grant.

The performance criteria, as defined in the share awards, provides for a graded awarding of shares based on the percentage by which the Company meets earnings before interest and taxes, as defined, in our 2016 business plan. The performance percentages, ranging from less than 80% to greater than 120%, provide for the awarding of shares ranging from no shares to 150% of the original amount of shares.

On May 20, 2016, we granted 39,004 restricted stock awards to the seven non-management members of the board of directors of the Company relating to their annual compensation for service on the board. The restricted stock awards have a fair value on date of grant of $10.32 per share based on the closing NASDAQ market price of the common stock on the day prior to the day the awards were granted. The restrictions on these stock awards lapse based solely on continued service on the first anniversary date of the grant.

9

Table of Contents

Stock Compensation Expense

We record stock compensation expense over an award’s vesting period based on the award’s fair value at the date of grant. We recorded compensation expense for stock based awards of $0.6 million for the three months ended July 2, 2016 and $0.5 million for the three months ended July 4, 2015. We recorded compensation expense for stock based awards of $1.1 million for the six months ended July 2, 2016 and $0.9 million for the six months ended July 4, 2015. As of July 2, 2016, and July 4, 2015, there was $2.7 million and $2.2 million, respectively, of total unrecognized compensation cost related primarily to restricted share awards. These costs are expected to be recognized in earnings on a straight-line basis over the weighted average remaining vesting period of 1.5 years at July 2, 2016, and 1.8 years at July 4, 2015.

NOTE 5. NET INCOME PER COMMON SHARE

Basic EPS is computed by dividing net income available to common shareholders, by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted EPS reflects the dilutive effect of potential common shares from securities such as stock options.

Weighted average shares outstanding for the three and six months ended July 2, 2016, and July 4, 2015, excludes underlying options and restricted stock awards of 20 thousand because their effects were anti-dilutive.

The table below presents the calculation of EPS and a reconciliation of weighted average common shares used in the calculation of basic and diluted EPS for our Company:

NOTE 6. ACQUISITION

On February 16, 2016 (the “closing date”), we completed the acquisition of WinDoor, which became a wholly-owned subsidiary of PGT Industries, Inc. The fair value of consideration transferred in the acquisition was $103.3 million, including the estimated fair value of contingent consideration of $3.0 million, which has been preliminarily allocated to the net assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the acquisition date, in accordance with ASC 805, “Business Combinations”. The cash portion of the acquisition was financed with borrowings under the 2016 Credit Agreement, and with $43.5 million of cash on hand.

10

Table of Contents

The estimated fair value of assets acquired and liabilities assumed as of the closing date, are as follows:

The fair value of working capital related items, such as accounts receivable, inventories, prepaids, and accounts payable and accrued liabilities, approximated their book values at the date of acquisition. The fair value of property and equipment and remaining useful lives were estimated by management using its knowledge of machinery and equipment in the window and door manufacturing industry, neither of which significantly differed from the net book values and remaining book lives of WinDoor’s property and equipment at the acquisition date. Valuations of the intangible assets (See Note 7) were valued using income and royalty relief approaches based on projections provided by management, which we consider to be Level 3 inputs.

Acquisition costs totaling $0.9 million are included in selling, general, and administrative expenses on the condensed consolidated statement of operations for the six months ended July 2, 2016, and relate to legal expenses, representations and warranties insurance, diligence, and accounting services.

The remaining consideration, after identified intangible assets and the net assets and liabilities recorded at fair value, was preliminarily determined to be $42.5 million, all of which is expected to be deductible for tax purposes, subject to the outcome of the earn-out contingency described below. Goodwill represents the increased value of the combined entity through additional sales channel opportunities as well as operational efficiencies. If our preliminary value of assets and liabilities changes, there will be an equal and offsetting change to the recorded goodwill.

The SPA provides for the potential for an earn-out contingency payment to sellers should WinDoor achieve a certain level of sales in the year ended December 31, 2016. Pursuant to the SPA, the Company is required to pay 5.9% of WinDoor’s sales in excess of $46.0 million for 2016 (including both the pre-acquisition and post-acquisition periods of 2016), up to a maximum sales amount of $51.0 million. The potential undiscounted amount of all future payments that could be required to be paid under the contingent earn-out consideration arrangement is between $0 and $3.0 million. We have recorded an earn-out contingency liability of $3.0 million in the first quarter of 2016, representing its estimated fair value using undiscounted cash flows, based on probability adjusted level of revenues with a range whose minimum is $51.0 million. Estimated sales is a significant input that is not observable in the market, which ASC 820 considers to be a Level 3 input. For tax purposes, contingent consideration does not become part of tax goodwill until paid. As such, the amount of goodwill deductible for tax purposes will not be finalized until the outcome of this earn-out contingency is known. As of July 2, 2016, the amount recorded for the contingent consideration, and the assumptions used to develop its estimated fair value had not changed.

11

Table of Contents

The SPA has a post-closing working capital calculation whereby we are required to prepare, and deliver to the sellers, a final statement of purchase price, including our calculation of the amount we find net working capital actually to have been as of the closing date. We finalized and delivered to the sellers our calculation of closing date net working capital, as defined in the SPA. Pursuant to the SPA, the sellers had 30 days to review our calculations, and have agreed to certain items of our calculations and questioned other items. As of July 2, 2016, the Company and the sellers were in discussions regarding the questioned items and finalizing the calculation of net working capital.

The following unaudited pro forma financial information assumes the acquisition had occurred at the beginning of the earliest period presented that does not include WinDoor’s actual results for the entire period. Pro forma results have been prepared by adjusting our historical results to include the results of WinDoor adjusted for the following: amortization expense related to the intangible assets arising from the acquisition and interest expense to reflect the 2016 Credit Agreement entered into in connection with the acquisition. The unaudited pro forma results below do not necessarily reflect the results of operations that would have resulted had the acquisition been completed at the beginning of the earliest periods presented, nor does it indicate the results of operations in future periods. The unaudited pro forma results do not include the impact of synergies, nor any potential impacts on current or future market conditions which could alter the following unaudited pro forma results.

NOTE 7. GOODWILL, TRADE NAMES, AND OTHER INTANGIBLE ASSETS

Goodwill, trade names, and other intangible assets, net, are as follows:

12

Table of Contents

NOTE 8. LONG-TERM DEBT

On February 16, 2016, we entered into a Credit Agreement (the “2016 Credit Agreement”), among us, the lending institutions identified in the 2016 Credit Agreement, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent. The 2016 Credit Agreement establishes senior secured credit facilities in an aggregate amount of $310.0 million, consisting of a $270.0 million Term B term loan facility maturing in six years that will amortize on a basis of 1% annually during the six-year term, and a $40.0 million revolving credit facility maturing in five years that includes a swing line facility and a letter of credit facility. Our obligations under the 2016 Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of our assets as well as our direct and indirect subsidiaries’ assets. As of July 2, 2016, there were $0.4 million of letters of credit outstanding and $39.6 million available on the revolver.

Interest on all loans under the 2016 Credit Agreement is payable either quarterly or at the expiration of any LIBOR interest period applicable thereto. Borrowings under the term loans and the revolving credit facility accrue interest at a rate equal to, at our option, LIBOR (with a floor of 100 basis points in respect of the term loan), or a base rate (with a floor of 200 basis points in respect of the term loan) plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is 575 basis points in the case of LIBOR and 475 basis points in the case of the base rate. We will pay quarterly fees on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility equal to 50 basis points per annum as well as a quarterly letter of credit fee at 575 basis points per annum plus a 12.5 basis point facing fee per annum on the face amount of any outstanding letters of credit.

The 2016 Credit Agreement contains a springing financial covenant, if we draw in excess of twenty percent (20%) of the revolving facility, which requires us to maintain a maximum total net leverage ratio (based on the ratio of total debt for borrowed money to trailing EBITDA, each as defined in the 2016 Credit Agreement), and will be tested quarterly based on the last four fiscal quarters and is set at levels as described in the 2016 Credit Agreement. As of July 2, 2016, no such test is required as we have not exceeded 20% of our revolving capacity.

The 2016 Credit Agreement also contains a number of affirmative and restrictive covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of additional debt, liens on property, acquisitions and investments, loans and guarantees, mergers, consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions, asset sales, dividends and other payments in respect of our capital stock, prepayments of certain debt and transactions with affiliates. The 2016 Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the amounts outstanding under the 2016 Credit Agreement may be accelerated and may become immediately due and payable.

In connection with entering into the 2016 Credit Agreement, on February 16, 2016, we terminated our prior credit agreement, dated as of September 22, 2014, among PGT Industries, Inc., as the borrower, the Company, as guarantor, the lenders from time to time party thereto and DeutscheBank, as administrative agent and collateral agent (the “2014 Credit Agreement”). Along with cash on hand, proceeds from the term loan facility under the 2016 Credit Agreement were used to repay amounts outstanding under the 2014 Credit Agreement, acquire WinDoor, and pay certain fees and expenses.

The face value of the 2016 Credit Agreement at the time of issuance was $270 million of which $1.35 million has been repaid as scheduled debt repayments through July 2, 2016. As of July 2, 2016, the face value of debt outstanding under the 2016 Credit Agreement was $268.7 million, and accrued interest was $2.1 million. The Company incurred third-party fees and costs totaling $1.5 million, and additional lender fees and discount of $14.6 million.

13

Table of Contents

The activity relating to third-party fees and costs, lender fees and discount for the six months ended July 2, 2016 are as follows. With our adoption of ASU 2015-03, all debt-related fees, costs and original issue discount are classified as a reduction of the carrying value of long-term debt:

Estimated amortization expense relating to third-party fees and costs, lender fees and discount for the years indicated as of July 2, 2016, is as follows:

The contractual future maturities of long-term debt outstanding as of July 2, 2016, are as follows (at face value):

14

Table of Contents

NOTE 9. ACCUMULATED OTHER COMPREHENSIVE LOSS

The following table shows the components of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended July 4, 2015. There was no activity for the three and six months ended July 2, 2016:

The following table shows the reclassification out of accumulated other comprehensive loss for the three and six months ended July 4, 2015. There was no activity for the three and six months ended July 2, 2016:

NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Litigation

Our Company is a party to various legal proceedings in the ordinary course of business. Although the ultimate disposition of those proceedings cannot be predicted with certainty, management believes the outcome of any claim that is pending or threatened, either individually or in the aggregate, will not have a materially adverse effect on our operations, financial position or cash flows.

15

Table of Contents

NOTE 11. INCOME TAXES

Income tax expense was $4.2 million for the three months ended July 2, 2016, compared with $6.3 million for the three months ended July 4, 2015. Our effective tax rate for the three months ended July 2, 2016, was 36.5%, and was 48.2% for the three months ended July 4, 2015. Income tax expense was $5.1 million for the six months ended July 2, 2016, compared with $10.0 million for the six months ended July 4, 2015. Our effective tax rate for the six months ended July 2, 2016, was 36.5%, and was 42.8% for the six months ended July 4, 2015.

Income tax expense in both the three and six month periods ended July 4, 2015, includes a $1.6 million discrete item of income tax expense representing income tax expense previously classified within accumulated other comprehensive losses, relating to the intraperiod income taxes on our effective aluminum hedges, allocated to other comprehensive income in the year ended January 2, 2010, which we reversed in the three months ended July 4, 2015, as the result of the culmination of our remaining cash flow hedges. Excluding this discrete item of income tax expense, the effective tax rate for the three and six month periods ended July 4, 2015, would have been 36.0% and 36.0%, respectively.

The effective tax rates in all periods, excluding the effect of the discreet item discussed above in the 2015 periods, were lower than our combined statutory federal and state tax rate of 38.8% primarily as the result of the estimated impact of the section 199 domestic manufacturing deduction.

At July 2, 2016, federal income taxes payable of $3.1 million was classified within accrued liabilities in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. At January 2, 2016, federal income taxes receivable of $3.9 million was classified within other current assets in the accompanying condensed consolidated balance sheet. During the three months ended July 2, 2016, we received a federal tax refund of $2.4 million.

NOTE 12. DERIVATIVES

The following represents the gains (losses) on derivative financial instruments for the three and six months ended July 4, 2015, and their classifications within the accompanying condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income. There were no amounts recognized in or reclassified from accumulated OCI(L) for the three and six months ended July 2, 2016:

16

Table of Contents

NOTE 13. FAIR VALUE

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. A three-tier fair value hierarchy is used to prioritize the inputs used in measuring fair value. The hierarchy gives the highest priority to unadjusted quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities and the lowest priority to unobservable inputs. A financial instrument’s level within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of any input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The three levels of the fair value hierarchy are as follows:

Level 1 Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities.

Level 2 Inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable for the asset or liability, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 Prices or valuations that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable.

The accounting guidance concerning fair value allows us to elect to measure financial instruments at fair value and report the changes in fair value through earnings. This election can only be made at certain specified dates and is irrevocable once made. We do not have a policy regarding specific assets or liabilities to elect to measure at fair value, but rather we make the election on an instrument-by-instrument basis as they are acquired or incurred.

During the three and six months ended July 2, 2016, or July 4, 2015, we did not make any transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 financial assets. We conduct reviews on a quarterly basis to verify pricing, assess liquidity, and determine if significant inputs have changed that would impact the fair value hierarchy disclosure.

Fair Value of Financial Instruments

Our financial instruments include cash, accounts and notes receivable, and accounts payable, and accrued liabilities whose carrying amounts approximate their fair values due to their short-term nature. Our financial instruments also include long-term debt. The fair value of our long-term debt is based on debt with similar terms and characteristics and was approximately $266.0 million as of July 2, 2016, and $192.5 million as of January 2, 2016. Fair value as of July 2, 2016 was determined based on observed trading prices of our debt between domestic financial institutions. Fair value at January 2, 2016 was estimated based on face value, less term-loan lender fees and discount.

17

Table of Contents

ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

The following discussion of our financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction with the Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations and the consolidated financial statements and notes thereto for the year ended January 2, 2016, included in our most recent Form 10-K annual report as well as our reports on Forms 10-Q and 8-K and other publicly available information. All amounts herein are unaudited.

Special Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements

From time to time, we have made or will make forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Exchange Act. These statements do not relate strictly to historical or current facts. Forward-looking statements usually can be identified by the use of words such as “goal”, “objective”, “plan”, “expect”, “anticipate”, “intend”, “project”, “believe”, “estimate”, “may”, “could”, or other words of similar meaning. Forward-looking statements provide our current expectations or forecasts of future events, results, circumstances or aspirations. Our disclosures in this report contain forward-looking statements within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. We may also make forward-looking statements in our other documents filed or furnished with the Securities and Exchange Commission and in oral presentations. Forward-looking statements are based on assumptions and by their nature are subject to risks and uncertainties, many of which are outside of our control. Our actual results may differ materially from those set forth in our forward-looking statements. There is no assurance that any list of risks and uncertainties or risk factors is complete. Factors that could cause actual results to differ materially from those described in our forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

Any forward-looking statements made by us or on our behalf speak only as of the date they are made and we do not undertake any obligation to update any forward-looking statement to reflect the impact of subsequent events or circumstances. Before making any investment decision, you should carefully consider all risks and uncertainties disclosed in all our SEC filings, including our reports on Forms 8-K, 10-Q and 10-K and our registration statements under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, all of which are accessible on the SEC’s website at www.sec.gov and at http://ir.pgtindustries.com/sec.cfm

EXECUTIVE OVERVIEW

Sales and Operations

On August 4, 2016, we issued a press release and held a conference call to review the results of operations for the three and six months ended July 2, 2016. During the call, we also discussed current market conditions and gave an update on the status of the integration of our acquisition of WinDoor. The overview and estimates contained in this report are consistent with those given in our press release and our conference call remarks; we are neither updating nor confirming that information.

We delivered a $119 million record-breaking sales quarter, which represented an 18.0% increase from the second quarter of 2015. We also generated EBITDA of $20.8 million, our highest EBITDA performance since the second quarter of 2006. Second quarter 2016 sales includes $10.4 million of sales from our WinDoor acquisition. Excluding sales from WinDoor, our second quarter 2016 sales increased 7.7% over last year, driven by higher vinyl impact-resistant product sales. Sales in our primary market of Florida represented 90% of total net sales during the second quarter of 2016. Impact product sales represented 82% of total net sales in the 2016 second quarter.

Gross margin increased $4.5 million, or 13.8%, in the second quarter of 2016, as compared to last year’s second quarter. As a percent of net sales, gross margin was 31.5%, compared to 32.7% last year. During the quarter, as we anticipated, we continued to incur

18

Table of Contents

added costs from running two parallel systems as we continue to finalize our Enterprise Reporting System, which negatively impacted gross margin in the second quarter of 2016 compared to last year. Gross margin was also impacted by a change in mix towards lower gross margin products, and higher depreciation on higher capital spending. These decreases in margin were partially offset by favorable material costs this year compared to last year, and the addition of WinDoor.

We are encouraged by market conditions and continue to see demand increase across all of our brands and market segments. Our backlog is a reflection of this demand and has grown to nearly $60 million. This positions us for a strong second half as we increase capacity to meet this growing demand. The Company’s outlook for the remainder of the year continues to be in line with market consensus.

Performance Summary

The following table presents financial data derived from our unaudited condensed consolidated statements of comprehensive income as a percentage of total net sales for the periods indicated (in thousands, except percentages):

19

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE THREE MONTHS ENDED JULY 2, 2016 AND JULY 4, 2015

The following table represents total sales by product category for the three months ended July 2, 2016, and July 4, 2015 (in millions):

Net sales of impact-resistant window and door products were $99.3 million for the second quarter of 2016, an increase of $17.7 million, or 21.7%, from $81.6 million in net sales for the second quarter of 2015. Included in sales of our impact-resistant window and door products were $73.2 million of aluminum impact sales, an increase of $9.4 million, or 14.8%, and $26.1 million of vinyl impact sales, an increase of $8.3 million, or 46.7%.

Net sales of other window and door products were $19.7 million for the second quarter of 2016, an increase of $0.5 million, or 2.6%, from $19.2 million in net sales for the 2015 second quarter.

Gross profit and gross margin

Gross profit was nearly $37.5 million in the second quarter of 2016, an increase of $4.5 million, or 13.8%, from $32.9 million in the 2015 second quarter. The gross margin percentage was 31.5% in the second quarter of 2016, compared to 32.7% in the prior year second quarter, a decrease of 1.2%. During the quarter, as we anticipated, we continued to incur added costs from running two parallel systems as we continue to finalize our Enterprise Reporting System, which reduced gross margin by 0.7%. Gross margin was also impacted by 0.7% due to a change in mix towards lower gross margin products, and by 0.5% from higher depreciation on higher capital spending. These decreases in margin were partially offset by favorable material costs, which benefitted gross margin by 0.4% compared to last year, and the addition of WinDoor, which benefitted gross margin by 0.3%.

20

Table of Contents

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $20.6 million in the second quarter of 2016, an increase of $3.8 million, or 22.9%, from $16.8 million in the 2015 second quarter. As a percentage of sales, these costs increased to 17.3%, an increase of 0.7%, from 16.6% from the second quarter of 2015. Of this increase, $1.9 million relates to the inclusion of WinDoor’s selling, general and administrative expenses. Excluding WinDoor’s selling, general and administrative expenses, the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily related to a $1.6 million increase in distribution costs on higher sales, a nearly $0.2 million increase in stock-based compensation, and a general increase in selling, general and administrative expenses on higher sales volume. Selling, general, and administrative expenses in the second quarter of 2016 includes intangible amortization of $1.6 million, related to our acquisition of intangibles from both WinDoor and CGI.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense was $5.3 million in the second quarter of 2016, an increase of $2.4 million, from $2.9 million in the prior year second quarter. During 2016, concurrent with the acquisition of WinDoor in the middle of the first quarter of 2016, we refinanced our then existing credit agreement into the 2016 Credit Agreement, a $270 million senior secured credit facility, which increased our outstanding debt balance to $270 million, up from $197.5 million at the end of 2015. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to the increase in outstanding debt under the new credit facility and resulting increase in average outstanding debt balance during the second quarter of 2016, compared to the second quarter of 2015. Interest expense is also being affected by higher amortization of deferred financing costs and discount.

Other expense, net

Other expense, net, was $0.1 million in the 2015 second quarter. The amount in the three months ended July 4, 2015 relates to the ineffective portions of our aluminum hedges.

Income tax expense

Our income tax expense was $4.2 million for the second quarter of 2016, compared with $6.3 million for the second quarter of 2015. Our effective tax rate for the second quarter of 2016 was 36.5%, and was 48.2% for the second quarter of 2015.

Income tax expense in the three month period ended July 4, 2015, includes a $1.6 million discrete item of income tax expense representing income tax expense previously classified within accumulated other comprehensive losses, relating to the intraperiod income taxes on our effective aluminum hedges, allocated to other comprehensive income in the year ended January 2, 2010, which we reversed in the three months ended July 4, 2015, as the result of the culmination of our remaining cash flow hedges. Excluding this discrete item of income tax expense, the effective tax rate for the three month period ended July 4, 2015, would have been 36.0%.

The effective tax rates in all periods, excluding the effect of the discreet items discussed above in the 2015 periods, were lower than our combined statutory federal and state tax rate of 38.8% as the result of the estimated impact of the section 199 domestic manufacturing deduction.

21

Table of Contents

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE SIX MONTHS ENDED JULY 2, 2016 AND JULY 4, 2015

The following table represents total sales by product category for the six months ended July 2, 2016, and July 4, 2015 (in millions):

Net sales of impact-resistant window and door products were $180.9 million for the first six months of 2016, an increase of $22.5 million, or 14.2%, from $158.4 million in net sales for the first six months of 2015. Included in sales of our impact-resistant window and door products were $132.1 million of aluminum impact sales, an increase of $9.1 million, or 7.4%, and $48.8 million of vinyl impact sales, an increase of $13.4 million, or 37.9%.

Net sales of other window and door products were $38.3 million for the first six months of 2016, an increase of $0.6 million, or 1.7%, from $37.7 million in net sales for the 2015 first six months.

Gross profit and gross margin

Gross profit was $67.5 million in the first half of 2016, an increase of $3.5 million, or 5.4%, from $64.0 million in the 2015 first half. The gross margin percentage was 30.8% in the first half of 2016, compared to 32.6% in the prior year first half, a decrease of 1.8%. The decrease in gross margin in the first half of 2016 was the result of investing in additional headcount in the first quarter in anticipation of our second quarter repair and remodeling season, which resulted in labor inefficiencies compared to the first half of 2015, impacting gross margin by 0.9%. Gross margin was further impacted by 0.7% as the result of added costs relating to running two parallel systems as we continue to finalize our Enterprise Resource Planning system, and by 0.5% due to higher depreciation on higher capital spending. A change in mix towards lower gross margin products impacted gross margin by 0.3%. These decreases were partially offset by the benefit of lower material prices in the first half of 2016 versus last year, which benefitted gross margin by 0.4%, and the addition of WinDoor, which added 0.2%.

Selling, general and administrative expenses

Selling, general and administrative expenses were $40.7 million in the first six months of 2016, an increase of $6.3 million, or 18.1%, from $34.4 million in the first six months of 2015. As a percentage of sales, these costs increased to 18.6%, an increase of 0.9%, from 17.6% from the first six months of 2015. Of this increase, $3.0 million relates to the inclusion of WinDoor’s selling, general and administrative expenses. Excluding WinDoor’s selling, general and administrative expenses, the increase in selling, general and administrative expenses was primarily related to a $2.0 million increase in distribution costs on higher sales, a $0.2 million increase in stock-based compensation, and a general increase in selling, general and administrative expenses on higher sales volume. Selling, general and administrative expenses in the first six months of 2016 also includes $1.0 million of WinDoor acquisition-related expenses. Selling, general, and administrative expenses in the first six months of 2016 includes intangible amortization of $2.9 million, related to our acquisition of intangibles from both WinDoor and CGI.

Interest expense, net

Interest expense was $9.4 million in the first six months of 2016, an increase of $3.5 million, from $5.9 million in the first six months of the prior year. During 2016, concurrent with the acquisition of WinDoor in the middle of the first quarter of 2016, we refinanced our then existing credit agreement into the 2016 Credit Agreement, a $270 million senior secured credit facility, which increased our outstanding debt balance to $270 million, up from $197.5 million at the end of 2015. The increase in interest expense was due primarily to the increase in outstanding debt under the new credit facility and resulting increase in average outstanding debt balance during the first six months of 2016, compared to the first six months of 2015. Interest expense is also being affected by higher amortization of deferred financing costs and discount.

22

Table of Contents

Debt extinguishment costs

Debt extinguishment costs were $3.4 million in the first six months of 2016. These costs related to the write-off of deferred financing costs and debt discount in connection with entering into the 2016 Credit Agreement effective on February 16, 2016, which resulted in certain then existing lenders exiting the facility, and certain continuing lenders being considered debt extinguishments in the refinancing. This resulted in the write-offs of portions of the deferred financing costs and original issue discount allocated to these lenders.

Other expense, net

Other expense, net, was $0.2 million in the first six months of 2015. The amount in the six months ended July 4, 2015 relates to the ineffective portions of our aluminum hedges.

Income tax expense

Our income tax expense was $5.1 million for the first six months quarter of 2016, compared with $10.0 million for the first six months of 2015. Our effective tax rate for the first six months of 2016 was 36.5%, and was 42.8% for the first six months of 2015.

Income tax expense in the six month period ended July 4, 2015, includes a $1.6 million discrete item of income tax expense representing income tax expense previously classified within accumulated other comprehensive losses, relating to the intraperiod income taxes on our effective aluminum hedges, allocated to other comprehensive income in the year ended January 2, 2010, which we reversed in the three months ended July 4, 2015, as the result of the culmination of our remaining cash flow hedges. Excluding this discrete item of income tax expense, the effective tax rate for the six month period ended July 4, 2015, would have been 36.0%.

The effective tax rates in all periods, excluding the effect of the discreet items discussed above in the 2015 periods, were lower than our combined statutory federal and state tax rate of 38.8% as the result of the estimated impact of the section 199 domestic manufacturing deduction.

23

Table of Contents

LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES

Our principal source of liquidity is cash flow generated by operations and supplemented by borrowings under our credit facilities. This cash generating capability provides us with financial flexibility in meeting operating and investing needs. Our primary capital requirements are to fund working capital needs, meet required debt service payments on our credit facilities and fund capital expenditures.

Consolidated Cash Flows

Operating activities. Cash provided by operating activities during the first six months of 2016 was $23.6 million, compared to $9.8 million in the first six months of 2015.

Direct cash flows from operations for the first six months of 2016 and 2015 are as follows:

Days sales outstanding (DSO), which we calculate as accounts receivable divided by quarterly average daily sales, was 35 days at July 2, 2016, compared to 32 days at July 4, 2015. DSO’s at July 2, 2016 were affected by certain large projects by CGI, which have longer payment terms.

Inventory on hand as of July 2, 2016, was $30.4 million, compared to $23.1 million at January 2, 2016, an increase of $7.3 million. The increase in inventory was due primarily to the acquisition of WinDoor.

We monitor and evaluate raw material inventory levels based on the need for each discrete item to fulfill short-term requirements calculated from current order patterns and to provide appropriate safety stock. Because all of our products are made-to-order, we have only a small amount of finished goods and work-in-process inventory. As a result of these factors, our inventories are not excessive and we believe the value of such inventories will be realized through sale.

Investing activities. Cash used in investing activities was $108.4 million for the first six months of 2016, compared to cash used in investing activities of $8.8 million for the first six months of 2015. We used $100.3 million of cash in the first six months of 2016 to acquire WinDoor. Excluding cash used to acquire WinDoor, there was a decrease in cash used in investing activities due to a decrease in capital expenditures of $0.7 million, which went from nearly $8.9 million in the first six months of 2015, to $8.2 million in the first six months of 2016.

Financing activities. Cash provided by financing activities was $52.8 million in the first six months of 2016, compared to cash provided by financing activities of $4.1 million in the first six months of 2015, an increase in cash provided of $48.7 million. Cash used for repayments of long-term debt in the first six months of 2016 compared to the first six months of 2015 increased nearly $197.9 million, as the result of the February 2016 refinancing and contemporaneous pay-down of our then existing credit facility. The February 2016 refinancing resulted in $261.0 million in proceeds from the issuance of long-term debt. In addition, there were payments of financing costs of $7.2 million related to the refinancing. Purchases of treasury stock were $2.8 million in the first six months of 2016 versus just $4 thousand in the first six months of 2015, a decrease in cash used of $2.8 million. Proceeds from the exercises of stock options were $1.4 million lower, and there was a decrease in tax benefits from option exercises of $3.1 million.

24

Table of Contents

Capital Resources and Debt Covenant. The 2016 Credit Agreement contains a springing financial covenant, if we draw in excess of twenty percent (20%) of the revolving facility, which requires us to maintain a maximum total net leverage ratio (based on the ratio of total debt for borrowed money to EBITDA, each as defined in the 2016 Credit Agreement), and is tested quarterly based on the last four fiscal quarters and is set at levels as described in the 2016 Credit Agreement. As of July 2, 2016, no test is required as we have not exceeded 20% of our revolving capacity. During 2016, the maximum permitted total net leverage ratio as stated in the 2016 Credit agreement is 4.50:1. We believe that our total net leverage ratio during 2016 will be in compliance with the 2016 Credit Agreement, and that we are in compliance with all covenants.

The 2016 Credit Agreement also contains a number of affirmative and restrictive covenants, including limitations on the incurrence of additional debt, liens on property, acquisitions and investments, loans and guarantees, mergers, consolidations, liquidations and dissolutions, asset sales, dividends and other payments in respect of our capital stock, prepayments of certain debt and transactions with affiliates. The 2016 Credit Agreement also contains customary events of default. Upon the occurrence of an event of default, the amounts outstanding under the 2016 Credit Agreement may be accelerated and may become immediately due and payable. As of July 2, 2016, we were in compliance with all affirmative and restrictive covenants.

On February 16, 2016, we entered into the 2016 Credit Agreement, among us, the lending institutions identified in the 2016 Credit Agreement, and Deutsche Bank AG New York Branch, as Administrative Agent and Collateral Agent. The 2016 Credit Agreement establishes new senior secured credit facilities in an aggregate amount of $310.0 million, consisting of a $270.0 million Term B term loan facility maturing in six years that will amortize on a basis of 1% annually during the six-year term, and a $40.0 million revolving credit facility maturing in five years that includes a swing line facility and a letter of credit facility. Our obligations under the 2016 Credit Agreement are secured by substantially all of our assets as well as our direct and indirect subsidiaries’ assets. As of July 2, 2016, there were $0.4 million of letters of credit outstanding and $39.6 million available on the revolver.

Interest on all loans under the 2016 Credit Agreement is payable either quarterly or at the expiration of any LIBOR interest period applicable thereto. Borrowings under the term loans and the revolving credit facility accrue interest at a rate equal to, at our option, LIBOR (with a floor of 100 basis points in respect of the term loan), or a base rate (with a floor of 200 basis points in respect of the term loan) plus an applicable margin. The applicable margin is 575 basis points in the case of LIBOR and 475 basis points in the case of the base rate. We pay quarterly fees on the unused portion of the revolving credit facility equal to 50 basis points per annum as well as a quarterly letter of credit fee at 575 basis points per annum plus a 12.5 basis point facing fee per annum on the face amount of any outstanding letters of credit.

The face value of the 2016 Credit Agreement at the time of issuance was $270 million of which $1.35 million has been repaid as scheduled debt repayments through July 2, 2016. As of July 2, 2016, the face value of debt outstanding under the 2016 Credit Agreement was $268.7 million. The Company incurred third-party fees and costs totaling $1.5 million, and additional lender fees and discount of $14.6 million, and accrued interest was $2.1 million.

The activity relating to third-party fees and costs, lender fees and discount for the six months ended July 2, 2016 are as follows. With our adoption of ASU 2015-03, all debt-related fees, costs and original issue discount are classified as a reduction of the carrying value of long-term debt:

25

Table of Contents

Estimated amortization expense relating to third-party fees and costs, lender fees and discount for the years indicated as of July 2, 2016, is as follows:

The contractual future maturities of long-term debt outstanding as of July 2, 2016, are as follows (at face value):

Capital Expenditures. Capital expenditures vary depending on prevailing business factors, including current and anticipated market conditions. For the first six months of 2016, capital expenditures were $8.2 million, compared to $8.8 million for the first six months of 2015. In 2016, we expect to spend approximately $18-$20 million on capital expenditures, primarily including machinery and equipment, and distribution equipment such as tractors and trailers.

Share Repurchase Program. On October 28, 2015, the Board of Directors authorized and approved a share repurchase program of up to $20 million. Repurchases are made in open market or privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements, our 2016 Credit Agreement, and other relevant factors. We do not intend to repurchase any shares from directors, officers, or other affiliates. The program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares. The timing, manner, price and amount of repurchases will be determined at the Company’s discretion, and the program may be suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason. During the first six months of 2016, we made repurchases of 288,183 shares of our common stock at a total cost of $2.7 million, all of which were made during the first quarter. During the remainder of 2016, we may continue to make opportunistic repurchases of our common stock as we see fit.

Contractual Obligations

Other than described below, there have been no significant changes to the “Disclosures of Contractual Obligations and Commercial Commitments” table in Part II, Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended January 2, 2016.

On February 16, 2016, we entered into the 2016 Credit Agreement. The 2016 Credit Agreement establishes new senior secured credit facilities in an aggregate amount of $310.0 million, consisting of a $270.0 million Term B term loan facility maturing in six years that will amortize on a basis of 1% annually during the six-year term, and a $40.0 million revolving credit facility maturing in five years that includes a swing line facility and a letter of credit facility. Our obligations under the 2016 Credit Agreement increased our debt level by $72.5 million, our required annual term loan repayments by $0.7 million, and our interest payment obligations by nearly $8 million.

26

Table of Contents

To cover its needs for aluminum, during the first six months of 2016, the Company has entered into contracts for future purchases of aluminum with two U.S. vendors of aluminum extrusion. At July 2, 2016, these contracts run through June 2017, and are for a total of 14.9 million pounds of aluminum at an average, delivered price of $0.87 per pound. This average price per pound includes components for the LME and Midwest premium, excluding conversion costs, and represents a contractual commitment totaling $13.0 million as of July 2, 2016.

Significant Accounting Policies and Critical Accounting Estimates

Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Significant accounting policies are those that are both important to the accurate portrayal of a Company’s financial condition and results, and those that require subjective or complex judgments, often as a result of the need to make estimates about the effect of matters that are inherently uncertain. We make estimates and assumptions that affect the amounts reported in our financial statements and accompanying notes. Certain estimates are particularly sensitive due to their significance to the financial statements and the possibility that future events may be significantly different from our expectations.

We identified our significant accounting policies in our Form 10-K annual report for the year ended January 2, 2016. There have been no changes to our critical accounting policies during the first six months of 2016.

Recently Issued Accounting Standards

In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13, “Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments”. ASU 2016-13 amends the impairment model to utilize an expected loss methodology in place of the currently used incurred loss methodology, which will result in the more timely recognition of losses. This update is effective for our fiscal year beginning after December 15, 2019, including interim periods within those fiscal years. ASU 2016-13 also applies to employee benefit plan accounting, with an effective date of fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We are currently assessing the impact that adopting this new accounting standard will have on our consolidated financial statements, footnote disclosures and employee benefit plan accounting.

In May 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-12, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Narrow Scope Improvements and Practical Expedients. ASU 2016-12 clarifies certain core recognition principles including collectability, sales tax presentation, noncash consideration, contract modifications and completed contracts at transition and disclosures no longer required if the full retrospective transition method is adopted. This new standard has the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU 2014-09, which is the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-10, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing,” which contains amendments to the new revenue recognition standard on identifying performance obligations and accounting for licenses of intellectual property, addressing issues raised by stakeholders and discussed by the Transition Resource Group. The amendments related to identifying performance obligations clarify when a promised good or service is separately identifiable and allows entities to disregard items that are immaterial in the context of a contract. The licensing implementation amendments clarify how an entity should evaluate the nature of its promise in granting a license of intellectual property, which will determine whether revenue is recognized over time or at a point in time. This new standard has the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU 2014-09, which is the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-09, “Compensation - Stock Compensation, Improvements to Employee Share-Based payment Accounting (Topic 718)”. This update is intended to provide simplification of the accounting for share based payment transactions, including the accounting for income taxes, forfeitures, and statutory tax withholding requirements, as well as classification in the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for our fiscal year beginning January 1, 2017. We are currently evaluating the impact of the adoption of ASU 2016-09 on our consolidated financial statements.

In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-08, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers (Topic 606): Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net),” which is an amendment to the new revenue recognition standard on assessing whether an entity is a principal or an agent in a revenue transaction. This amendment addresses implementation issues that were discussed by the Revenue Recognition TRG to clarify the principal versus agent assessment and lead to more consistent application. This new standard has the same effective date and transition requirements as ASU 2014-09, which is the first quarter of 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact of adopting this guidance.

27

Table of Contents

In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2016-02, “Leases (Topic 842)”. This guidance supersedes the existing guidance for lease accounting, Leases (Topic 840). ASU 2016-02 requires lessees to recognize leases on their balance sheets, and leaves lessor accounting largely unchanged. The amendments in this ASU are effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and interim periods within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted for all entities. ASU 2016-02 requires a modified retrospective approach for all leases existing at, or entered into after, the date of initial application, with an option to elect to use certain transition relief. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this new standard on its consolidated financial statements.

We experience changes in interest expense when market interest rates change. Changes in our debt could also increase these risks. Based on debt outstanding at July 2, 2016 of $268.7 million, a 100 basis point increase above the interest rate floor of 100 basis points would result in approximately $2.7 million of additional interest costs annually.

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures. Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in the Company’s reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act, is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms.

A control system, however, no matter how well conceived and operated, can at best provide reasonable, not absolute, assurance that the objectives of the control system are met. Additionally, a control system reflects the fact that there are resource constraints, and the benefits of controls must be considered relative to costs. Because of the inherent limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of error or fraud, if any, within our Company have been detected, and due to these inherent limitations, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.

Our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, with the assistance of management, evaluated the design, operation and effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act) as of the end of the period covered by this report (the “Evaluation Date”). Based on that evaluation, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer concluded that, as of the Evaluation Date, our disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purposes of ensuring that information required to be disclosed in our reports filed under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized, and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting. During the period covered by this report, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting identified in connection with the evaluation described above that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.

28

Table of Contents

PART II — OTHER INFORMATION

We are involved in various claims and lawsuits incidental to the conduct of our business in the ordinary course. We carry insurance coverage in such amounts in excess of our self-insured retention as we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances and that may or may not cover any or all of our liabilities with respect to claims and lawsuits. We do not believe that the ultimate resolution of these matters will have a material adverse impact on our financial position or results of operations.

Although our business and facilities are subject to federal, state, and local environmental regulation, environmental regulation does not have a material impact on our operations. We believe that our facilities are in material compliance with such laws and regulations. As owners and lessees of real property, we can be held liable for the investigation or remediation of contamination on such properties, in some circumstances without regard to whether we knew of or were responsible for such contamination. Our current expenditures with respect to environmental investigation and remediation at our facilities are minimal, although no assurance can be provided that more significant remediation may not be required in the future as a result of spills or releases of petroleum products or hazardous substances, or the discovery of previously unknown environmental conditions.

In addition to the other information set forth in this report, you should carefully consider the factors discussed in Part 1, “Item 1A. Risk Factors” of our Form 10-K annual report for the year ended January 2, 2016, which could materially affect our business, financial condition, or future results.

Additional risk and uncertainties not currently known to us or that we currently deem to be immaterial, may also materially adversely affect our business, financial condition, and/or operating results.

Unregistered Sales of Equity Securities and Use of Proceeds

None.

Issuer Purchases of Equity

On October 28, 2015, our Board of Directors authorized and approved a share repurchase program of up to $20 million. Repurchases are made in open market or privately negotiated transactions, subject to market conditions, applicable legal requirements, our 2016 Credit Agreement, and other relevant factors. We do not intend to repurchase any shares from directors, officers, or other affiliates. The program does not obligate us to acquire any specific number of shares. The timing, manner, price and amount of repurchases will be determined at the Company’s discretion, and the program may be suspended, terminated or modified at any time for any reason.

There were no repurchases under this program during the three month period ended July 2, 2016. As such, the maximum approximate dollar value of shares that may yet be purchased under the plan of $17.3 million as of April 2, 2016, the end of our 2016 first quarter, remained unchanged during the 2016 second quarter.

None.

Not applicable.

None.

29

Table of Contents

The following items are attached or incorporated herein by reference:

30

Table of Contents

31

Table of Contents

SIGNATURES

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the Registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto duly authorized.

32