Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. - Annual Report: 2010 (Form 10-K)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-K
(Mark
One)
x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT
TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT
OF 1934
For the
fiscal year ended October 31, 2010
o TRANSITION REPORT
PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES
EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934
For the
transition period from _____________ to ______________
Commission
File No. 000-50956
PHARMA-BIO
SERV, INC.
(Exact
Name of Registrant as Specified in Its Charter)
Delaware
|
20-0653570
|
(State
or Other Jurisdiction of
Incorporation
or Organization)
|
(IRS Employer
Identification
No.)
|
Pharma-Bio
Serv Building,
#6
Road 696
Dorado,
Puerto Rico
|
00646
(Zip
Code)
|
(Address
of Principal Executive Offices)
|
787-278-2709
(Registrant’s
Telephone Number, Including Area Code)
Securities
registered under Section 12(b) of the Exchange Act: None
Securities
registered under Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act: Common Stock, par value
$0.0001 per share
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in
Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to
Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act. Yes ¨ No x
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the
preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to
file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the
past 90 days. Yes x
No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on
its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be
submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this
chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the
registrant was required to submit and post such files).
Yes ¨ No ¨
Indicate
by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of
Regulation S-K (§229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not
be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or
information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K
or any amendment to this Form 10-K. ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See
the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller
reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.
Large
accelerated filer ¨
|
Accelerated
filer ¨
|
|
Non-accelerated
filer ¨
|
Smaller
reporting companyx
|
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Act). Yes ¨ No x
The
approximate aggregate market value of common stock held by non-affiliates of the
registrant, based on the closing price for the registrant’s common stock on
April 30, 2010 (the last business day of the second quarter of the registrant’s
current fiscal year), was $3,140,152.10.
The
number of shares of the registrant’s common stock outstanding as of January 27,
2011 was 20,751,215.
DOCUMENTS
INCORPORATED BY REFERENCE
Portions
of the registrant’s Proxy Statement relative to the 2011 Annual Meeting of
Stockholders are incorporated by reference in Part III hereof.
PHARMA-BIO
SERV, INC.
FORM
10-K
FOR
THE YEAR ENDED OCTOBER 31, 2010
TABLE
OF CONTENTS
Page
|
|||
PART
I
|
|||
ITEM
1
|
BUSINESS
|
1
|
|
ITEM
1A
|
RISK
FACTORS
|
6
|
|
ITEM
1B
|
UNRESOLVED
STAFF COMMENTS
|
13
|
|
ITEM
2
|
PROPERTIES
|
13
|
|
ITEM
3
|
LEGAL
PROCEEDINGS
|
13
|
|
ITEM
4
|
(REMOVED
AND RESERVED)
|
13
|
|
PART
II
|
|||
ITEM
5
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
|
14
|
|
ITEM
6
|
SELECTED
FINANCIAL DATA
|
15
|
|
ITEM
7
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
|
15
|
|
ITEM
7A
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
|
23
|
|
ITEM
8
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA (See F-1)
|
23
|
|
ITEM
9
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND
FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
|
23
|
|
ITEM
9A
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES
|
23
|
|
ITEM
9B
|
OTHER
INFORMATION
|
24
|
|
PART
III
|
|||
ITEM
10
|
DIRECTORS,
EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
|
25
|
|
ITEM
11
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION
|
25
|
|
ITEM
12
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
|
25
|
|
ITEM
13
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE
|
25
|
|
ITEM
14
|
PRINCIPAL
ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
|
25
|
|
PART
IV
|
|||
ITEM
15
|
EXHIBITS,
FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES
|
26
|
|
SIGNATURES
|
27
|
||
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
|
F-1
|
PART
I
ITEM
1. BUSINESS.
GENERAL
Pharma-Bio
Serv, Inc. is a Delaware corporation, organized in 2004 under the name Lawrence
Consulting Group, Inc. In February 2006, our corporate name was changed to
Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc.
On
January 25, 2006, pursuant to an agreement and plan of merger among us, Plaza
Acquisition Corp., Pharma-Bio Serv PR, Inc. (then known as Plaza Consulting
Group, Inc. and referred to as “Pharma-PR”), and the then sole stockholder of
Pharma-PR, Plaza Acquisition Corp. was merged into Pharma-PR, with the result
that Pharma-PR became our wholly-owned subsidiary and our sole business became
the business of Pharma-PR.
Pharma-PR
business was established as a sole proprietorship in 1993 and incorporated in
1997 to offer compliance consulting services to the pharmaceutical industry. The
business operations provide services to the pharmaceutical, biotechnology,
medical device and chemical manufacturing companies principally in Puerto Rico,
the United States and Europe.
Our
executive offices are located at Pharma-Bio Serv Building, #6 Road 696, Dorado,
Puerto Rico 00646. Our telephone number is (787)
278-2709.
Our
website is www.pharmabioserv.com. Information on our website or any other
website is not part of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.
References
to “we,” “us,” “our” and similar words in this Annual Report on Form 10-K refer
to Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. and its subsidiaries.
OVERVIEW
We are a
compliance and technology transfer services consulting firm with a laboratory
testing facility with headquarters in Puerto Rico, servicing the Puerto Rico,
United States and Europe markets. The compliance consulting service sector in
those markets consists of local compliance and validation consulting firms,
United States dedicated validation and compliance consulting firms and large
publicly traded and private domestic and foreign engineering and consulting
firms. We provide a broad range of compliance related consulting services. We
also provide microbiological testing services and chemical testing services
through our laboratory testing facility (“Lab”) in Puerto Rico. We also provide
information technology consulting services and technical trainings/seminars,
which services are not currently significant to our operating results. We market
our services to pharmaceutical, chemical, biotechnology and medical devices, and
allied products companies in Puerto Rico, the United States and Europe. Our team
includes more than 135 experienced engineering and life science professionals,
and includes former quality assurance managers or directors, and experienced and
trained professionals with bachelors, masters and doctorate degrees in health
sciences and engineering.
We have a
well-established and consistent relationship with the major pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing companies in Puerto
Rico and the United States, which provides us access to affiliated companies in
other markets. We seek opportunities in markets that could yield profitable
margins using our professional consulting force and also provide new services
such as those performed by our new microbiological testing laboratory facility,
our information technology service division, Integratek, and our technical
training division, Pharma Serv Academy.
Integratek
provides a variety of information technology services such as web pages and
portals development, digital art design, intranets, extranets, software
development including database integration, Windows and web applications
development, software technical training and learning management systems,
technology project management, and compliance consulting services, among others.
Our Pharma Serv Academy division, through a network of leading industry
professional experts in their field, which include resources of our own,
provides technical seminars/training that incorporates the latest regulatory
trends and standards as well as other related areas. Although these services are
not currently significant to our operating results, our goal is to broaden the
portfolio of services that we can provide to our customer base and also target
other potential customers in other industries.
-1-
We
believe the most significant factors to achieving future business growth
includes our ability to: (i) continue to provide quality value-added
compliance services to our clients; (ii) recruit and retain highly educated and
experienced professionals; (iii) further expand our products and services to
address the expanding needs of our clients; and (iv) expand our market presence
in the United States, Europe and possibly other emerging pharmaceutical markets
in order to respond to the international compliance needs of our
clients. Since our business is conducted mainly in Puerto Rico, our
business is affected to the extent that Puerto Rico’s current economic downturn
affects the decision of our clients and potential clients to establish
operations in Puerto Rico or to continue or expand their existing
operations.
Our
revenue is derived from (i) time and materials contracts (representing
approximately 85% of total revenues), where the clients are charged for the
time, materials and expenses incurred on a particular project or service, (ii)
fixed-fee contracts or from “not to exceed” contracts (approximately 8% of total
revenues), which are generally short-term contracts, in which the value of the
contract cannot exceed a stated amount, and (iii) laboratory testing
(representing approximately 7% of total revenues) which generally is completed
and certified within days of sample receipt. For time and materials contracts,
our revenue is principally a function of the number of resources and the number
of hours billed per professional. To the extent that our revenue is based on
fixed-fee or “not to exceed” contracts, our ability to operate profitably is
dependent upon our ability to estimate accurately the costs that we will incur
on a project and to manage and monitor the project. If we underestimate our
costs on any contract, we could sustain a loss on the contract or its
profitability might be reduced.
The
principal components for our consulting costs of services are resource
compensation (salaries and wages, independent contractors’ fees, taxes and
benefits) and expenses relating to the performance of the services. In order to
ensure that our pricing is competitive yet minimize the impact in our margins,
we manage increasing labor costs by (i) selecting resources according to our
cost for specific projects, (ii) negotiating, where applicable, rates with the
resource, (iii) subcontracting labor and (iv) negotiating and passing rate
increases to our customers, as applicable. Although this strategy has been
successful in the past, we cannot give any assurance that such strategy will
continue to be successful. As for our testing laboratory operation, the major
costs of services components are salaries and wages, occupancy and depreciation
expenses, plus consumable goods usage.
We have
established quality systems for our employees which include:
|
·
|
Training Programs - including a
Current Good Manufacturing Practices exam prior to recruitment and
periodic refreshers;
|
|
·
|
Recruitment Full Training Program
- including employee manual, dress code, time sheets and good project
management and control procedures, job descriptions, and firm operating
and administration
procedures;
|
|
·
|
Safety Program - including OSHA,
Environmental Health and Safety;
and
|
|
·
|
Code of Ethics and Business
Conduct - a code of ethics and business conduct is used and enforced as
one of the most significant company controls on personal
behavior.
|
In
addition, we have implemented procedures to respond to client complaints and
customer satisfaction survey procedures. As part of our employee performance
appraisal annual process, our clients receive an evaluation form for employee
project performance feedback, including compliance with our code of
ethics.
BUSINESS
STRATEGY AND OBJECTIVES
We are
actively pursuing new markets as part of our growth strategy. We have a
well-established and consistent relationship with the major pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing companies in Puerto
Rico and the United States which provides us access to affiliated companies in
other markets. We seek opportunities in markets that could yield profitable
margins using our professional consulting force and also provide new services
such as those performed by our microbiological testing laboratory facility and
our acquired information technology service firm.
-2-
Our
business strategy is based on a commitment to provide premium quality and
professional consulting services and reliable customer service to our customer
base. Our business strategy and objectives are as follow:
|
·
|
Continue growth in consulting
services in each technical service, quality assurance, regulatory
compliance, technology transfer, validation, engineering, laboratory
testing and manufacturing departments by achieving greater market
penetration from our marketing and sales
efforts;
|
|
·
|
Continue to enhance our technical
consulting services through internal growth and acquisitions that provide
solutions to our customers’
needs;
|
|
·
|
Motivate our professionals and
support staff by implementing a compensation program which includes both
individual performance and overall company performance as elements of
compensation;
|
|
·
|
Create a pleasant corporate
culture and emphasize operational quality safety and timely
service;
|
|
·
|
Continue to maintain our
reputation as a trustworthy and highly ethical partner;
and
|
|
·
|
Efficiently manage our operating
and financial costs and
expenses.
|
2006
U.S. Validation Compliance Service Business Acquisition
In January 2006, we acquired a
validation compliance service business which serves mainly the United States
East Coast market. We host
our U.S. market expansion plans from this organization.
2007
Entrance to Ireland Market
In
September 2007, we entered into the Ireland market through the formation of
an 80%-owned subsidiary. Currently, we provide the Ireland market the same
services we are currently providing in the Puerto Rico and United States
markets.
2008
Integratek Acquisition
On
December 2008, we acquired through one of our subsidiaries the operations and
assets of Integratek Corp. (“Integratek”), an information technology services
and consulting firm based in Puerto Rico. With this acquisition we broaden the
portfolio of services to our customer base and also target other potential
customers in other industries.
2009
Laboratory Testing Facility
Our
laboratory testing facility (“Lab”) located in Puerto Rico, with an investment
of $1.5 million for microbiology, chemical and environmental testing, commenced
operations in early fiscal 2009. The Lab incorporates the latest technology and
test methodologies meeting pharmacopoeia industry standards and regulations. It
offers testing and related services to our core industries already serviced as
well as the cosmetic and food industries.
2010
Minority Controlled Company Certification
In line
with the strategy to penetrate the United States market, on September 1, 2010 we
obtained the renewal of the certification as a "minority-controlled company" as
defined by the National Minority Supplier Development Council and Growth
Initiative ("NMSDC"). The certification allows us to participate in corporate
diversity programs available from various potential customers in the United
States and Puerto Rico. The certification is subject to renewal on September 1,
2011.
-3-
TECHNICAL
CONSULTING SERVICES
We have
established a reputation as a premier technical consulting services firm to the
pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing
industries in Puerto Rico. These services include regulatory compliance,
validation, technology transfer, engineering, project management and process
support. We have approximately 25 clients that are among the largest
pharmaceutical, chemical manufacturing, medical device and biotechnology
companies in Puerto Rico. We are actively participating
in exhibitions, conferences, conventions and seminars as either exhibitors,
sponsors or conference speakers.
MARKETING
We
conduct our marketing activities in Puerto Rico as well as the United States and
other marketplaces. We actively utilize our project managers and leaders who are
currently managing consulting service contracts at various client locations to
also market consulting and laboratory testing services to their existing and
past client relationships. Our senior management is also actively involved in
the marketing process, especially in marketing to major accounts. Our senior
management and staff also concentrate on developing new business opportunities
and focus on the larger customer accounts (by number of professionals or dollar
volume) and responding to prospective customers’ requests for
proposals.
PRINCIPAL
CUSTOMERS
We
provide a substantial portion of our services to three customers, each of whom
accounted for 10% or more of our revenues in the years ended October 31, 2010
and 2009. During the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, these customers
accounted for, in the aggregate, 45% and 48% of total revenue, respectively. In
spite of the fact that just a few customers represent a significant source of
revenue, our functions are not a continuous process, accordingly, the client
base for which our services are typically rendered, on a project-by-project
basis, changes regularly. Therefore, in any given
year a small number of customers could represent a significant source of our
revenue for that year. The loss of or significant reduction in the scope of work
performed for any major customer or our inability to replace customers upon
completion of contracts could adversely affect our revenue and impair our
ability to operate profitably.
COMPETITION
We are
engaged in a highly competitive and fragmented industry. Some of our competitors
are, on an overall basis, larger than we are or are subsidiaries of larger
companies, and therefore may possess greater resources than we do. Furthermore,
because the technical professional aspects of our consulting business do not
usually require large amounts of capital, there is relative ease of market entry
for a new entrant possessing acceptable professional qualifications.
Accordingly, we compete with regional, national, and international firms. Within
the Puerto Rico, United States and Ireland markets, certain competitors,
including local competitors, may possess greater resources than we do as well as
better access to clients and potential clients.
Competition
for validation and consulting services used to be primarily based on reputation,
track record, experience, and quality of service. However, given the economic
recession and our clients' strategies to reduce costs, price of service has
become a major factor in sourcing our services. We believe that we enjoy
significant competitive advantages over other consulting service firms because
of our historical market share within Puerto Rico (18 years), brand name,
reputation and track record with many of the major pharmaceutical,
biotechnology, medical device and chemical manufacturing companies which have
presence in the markets we are pursuing.
-4-
The
market of qualified and experienced professionals that are capable of providing
technical consulting services is very competitive and consists primarily of our
competitors as well as companies in the pharmaceutical, chemical, biotechnology
and medical device industries who are our clients and potential clients. In
seeking qualified personnel we market our name recognition in the Puerto Rico
market, our reputation with our client, salary and benefit package, company
stock options and a low turnover of qualified employees.
RAW
MATERIALS
We
require the use of various raw materials, including culture media, DNA reagents,
LAL reagents and biological indicators, in our testing laboratory
facility. We purchase these raw materials from various suppliers. At
times, we concentrate orders among a few suppliers in order to strengthen our
supplier relationships and receive quantity discounts. Raw materials are
generally available from multiple suppliers at competitive prices, and amounts
kept in stock are not significant.
ENVIRONMENTAL
REGULATIONS
Activities
in our microbiological testing laboratory facility are regulated under Puerto
Rico and U.S. federal laws designed to protect workers and the environment. Some
of these laws include the Occupational Safety and Health Act and the Resource
Conservation and Recovery Act. These laws apply to the use, handling and
disposal of various biological and chemical substances used in our processes. We
believe we are in material compliance with these laws and that continued
compliance will not have a materially adverse effect on our business. No
specific accounting for environmental compliance has been maintained or
projected by us at this time.
INTELLECTUAL
PROPERTY RIGHTS
We have
no proprietary software or products. We rely on non-disclosure agreements with
our employees to protect the proprietary software and other proprietary
information of our clients. Any unauthorized use or disclosure of this
information could harm our business.
EMPLOYEES
We
currently employ 95 full time employees. None of our employees are
represented by a labor union, and we consider our employee relations to be
good.
EXECUTIVE
OFFICERS
The
following table sets forth certain information with respect to our executive
officers.
Name
|
Age
|
Position
|
||
Elizabeth
Plaza
|
47
|
President,
Chairman of the Board and Director
|
||
Nélida Plaza
|
43
|
President
of Puerto Rico Operations and Secretary
|
||
Pedro
J. Lasanta
|
51
|
Chief
Financial Officer and Vice President - Finance and
Administration
|
-5-
Elizabeth Plaza has been the
president and sole director of Pharma-PR since 1997, when the Company was
incorporated after operating as a sole proprietorship since 1993, and she has
been our president and chief executive officer since January 25, 2006. Ms. Plaza
holds a B.S. in Pharmaceutical Sciences, magna cum laude, from the School of
Pharmacy of the University of Puerto Rico. She was a 40 under 40 Caribbean
Business Award recipient in 2002, the 2003 recipient of Ernst & Young’s
Entrepreneur of the Year Award in Health Science, one of the 2003 recipients of
the Puerto Rico Powerful Business Women Award, elected as Puerto Rico
Manufacturers Association 2004 (Metropolitan-West Region) Executive of the Year,
Puerto Rico 2008 Executive of the Year, and is member of the Board for the
Puerto Rico Commerce & Export Company.
Nélida Plaza has been the vice
president of operations of Pharma-PR since January 2004, our secretary since
January 25, 2006, and our President of Puerto Rico Operations since December 31,
2009, in charge of Scienza Labs, Pharma Academy and Pharma-PR. Ms. Plaza served
as our vice president from January 25, 2006 to December 31, 2009. In July 2000,
Ms. Plaza joined Pharma-PR as a project management consultant. In the past, Ms.
Plaza was a unit operations leader and safety manager at E.I. DuPont De Nemours
where she was involved with the development, support and audit of environmental,
safety and occupational health programs. Ms. Plaza holds a M.S. in Environmental
Management from the University of Houston in Clear Lake and a B.S. in Chemical
Engineering from the University of Puerto Rico. Nélida Plaza was recognized by
Casiano Communications as one of the 40 under 40 distinguished executives in
Puerto Rico.
Pedro J. Lasanta has been our
chief financial officer and vice president - finance and administration since
November 2007. From 2006 until October 2007, Mr. Lasanta was in private practice
as an accountant, tax and business counselor. From 1999 until 2006, Mr. Lasanta
was the Chief Financial Officer for Pearle Vision Center PR, Inc. In the past,
Mr. Lasanta was also an audit manager for Ernst & Young, formerly Arthur
Young & Company. He is a cum laude graduate in business administration
(accounting) from the University of Puerto Rico. Mr. Lasanta is a
certified public accountant.
Elizabeth
Plaza and Nélida Plaza are sisters.
ITEM
1A. RISK FACTORS.
This
Annual Report on Form 10-K includes “forward-looking statements” within the
meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended,
including, in particular, certain statements about our plans, strategies and
prospects. Although we believe that our plans, intentions and expectations
reflected in or suggested by such forward-looking statements are reasonable, we
cannot assure you that such plans, intentions or expectations will be achieved.
Important factors that could cause our actual results to differ materially from
our forward-looking statements include those set forth in this Risk Factors
section.
If any of
the following risks, or other risks not presently known to us or that we
currently believe to not be significant, develop into actual events, then our
business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows or prospects
could be materially adversely affected.
Risks That Relate to our
Business
Because
our business is concentrated in the pharmaceutical industry in Puerto Rico, and
to a lesser extent in the United States and other countries, any changes in that
industry or in those markets could impair our ability to generate revenue and
realize a profit.
Since
most of our business is performed in Puerto Rico, and to a lesser extent in the
United States and other countries, for pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical
device and chemical manufacturing companies, our ability to generate revenue and
realize a profit could be impaired by factors impacting those
markets. For example, changes in tax laws or regulatory, political or
economic conditions, which discourage businesses from operating in the markets
we serve, which affect the need for services such as those provided by us, could
impair our ability to generate revenue and realize a profit.
-6-
Puerto
Rico government enacted ACT 154 of October 22, 2010 which may adversely affect
the willingness of our customers to do business in Puerto Rico and consequently
adversely affect our business.
On
October 22, 2010, Act No. 154 was enacted by the Puerto Rico government. The Act
primarily affects the industry we serve and consequently our customer base. Act
154 extends the circumstances under which a nonresident alien individual or a
non resident corporation or partnership can be treated as doing business in
Puerto Rico and is deriving income from sources within Puerto Rico for purposes
of income tax. It also provides for the imposition of a temporary excise tax on
some acquisitions by non-resident individuals, corporations or partnerships, of
products total or partially manufactured or produced in Puerto Rico and of
related services to said products of affiliated entities with the buyer. It
basically adopts a modified income sourcing rule and a temporary excise tax that
will be enforced for a period of six (6) years and will decrease gradually
during this time.
The
impact of the Act, if any, over the industry and its willingness to do business
in Puerto Rico is unknown. Consequently, our ability to generate revenue in
Puerto Rico may be impaired.
Changes
in tax benefits may affect the willingness of companies to continue or expand
their operations in Puerto Rico.
Until
1996, the Internal Revenue Code provided certain tax benefits to pharmaceutical
companies operating in Puerto Rico by enabling their Puerto Rico operations to
operate free from federal income taxes. Partly as a result of the tax benefits,
numerous pharmaceutical companies established facilities in Puerto Rico. In
1996, this tax benefit was eliminated, although companies that had facilities in
Puerto Rico could continue to receive these benefits for ten years, at which
time the benefits were set to expire. In order to promote business activities in
Puerto Rico, in May 2008 the Puerto Rico government enacted a tax incentive law
(“Act 73”). Act 73 provides tax exemption from various taxes, including income
tax, and investment credits for activities similar to those of our customers and
our company. The change in the tax laws may affect favorably or unfavorably the
willingness of pharmaceutical companies to continue or to expand their Puerto
Rico operations. To the extent that pharmaceutical companies choose to develop
and manufacture products outside of Puerto Rico, our ability to generate new
business may be adversely impaired.
Puerto
Rico’s economy, including its governmental financial crisis, may affect the
willingness of businesses to commence or expand operations in Puerto
Rico.
As a
result of Puerto Rico’s governmental financial crisis, businesses may be
reluctant to establish or expand their operations in Puerto Rico. Further, since
Puerto Rico’s economy is petroleum-based, the fluctuating price of oil, combined
with Puerto Rico’s high level of debt, may make Puerto Rico a less attractive
place to expand existing operations or commence new business activities. To the
extent that companies in the pharmaceutical and related industries decide not to
commence new operations or not to expand their existing operations in Puerto
Rico, the market for our services may decline.
Other
factors, including economic factors, may affect the decision of businesses to
continue or expand their operations in Puerto Rico.
Companies
in the pharmaceutical and related industries for which we perform service are
subject to economic pressures, which affect their global operations and which
may influence the decision to reduce or increase the scope of their operations
in Puerto Rico. These companies consider a wide range of factors in making such
a decision, and may be influenced by a need to consolidate operations, to reduce
expenses, to increase their business in geographical regions where there are
large customer bases, tax, regulatory and political considerations and many
other factors. We cannot assure you that our customers and potential customers
will not make extensive reductions or terminate their operations in Puerto Rico
entirely, which could significantly impair our ability to generate
revenue.
-7-
Because
our business is dependent upon a small number of clients, the loss of a major
client could impair our ability to operate profitably.
Our
business has been dependent upon a small number of clients. During the years
ended October 31, 2010 and 2009, a very small number of clients accounted for a
disproportionately large percentage of our revenue. In the years ended October
31, 2010 and 2009, three customers accounted for, in aggregate, approximately
45% and 48% of total revenue, respectively. The loss of or significant reduction
in the scope of work performed for any major customer could impair our ability
to operate profitably. We cannot assure you that we will not sustain significant
decreases in revenue from our major customers or that we will be able to replace
any major customers or the resulting decline in revenue.
Customer
procurement and sourcing practices intended to reduce costs could have an
adverse affect on our margins and profitability.
In an
effort to reduce their costs, many of our customers are establishing or
extending the scope of their procurement departments to include consulting and
project services such as ours. As a result, we have less interaction with the
end user of our services (typically labs or production units) when bidding on a
project, which we believe decreases the focus on the quality of service provided
and increases the emphasis on cost of the service. This may cause us to lower
the price of our bids, which would reduce the margins in a given project. Also,
some customers have established vendor management programs with third-parties
(some of whom are also our competitors). Because these vendor management
programs may receive a percentage of our fees, without a corresponding increase
in the fee itself, our margins would decline. In addition, where a vendor
management program is a competitor for a particular service we provide, we may
have difficulty securing that particular project, which would adversely impact
revenue.
Since
our business is dependent upon the development and enhancement of patented
pharmaceutical products or processes by our clients, the failure of our clients
to obtain and maintain patents could impair our ability to operate
profitably.
Companies
in the pharmaceutical industry are highly dependent on their ability to obtain
and maintain patents for their products or processes. We are aware of some
pharmaceutical companies with operations in Puerto Rico whose patent rights may
expire in the near future. The inability to obtain new patents and the
expiration of active patents may reduce the need for our services and thereby
impair our ability to operate profitably.
We
may be unable to pass on increased labor costs to our clients.
The
principal components of our cost of revenues are employee compensation
(salaries, wages, taxes and benefits) and expenses relating to the performance
of the services we provide. We face increasing labor costs which we seek to pass
on to our customers through increases in our rates. To remain competitive, we
may not be able to pass these increased costs on to our clients, and, to the
extent that we are not able to pass these increased costs on to our clients, our
gross margin will be reduced.
Consolidation
in the pharmaceutical industry may have a harmful effect on our
business.
In recent
years, the pharmaceutical industry has undergone consolidation, and may in the
future undergo further substantial consolidation which may reduce the number of
our existing and potential customers. The consolidation in the
pharmaceutical industry may have a harmful effect on our business and or ability
to maintain and replace customers.
Because
the pharmaceutical industry is subject to government regulations, changes in
government regulations relating to this industry may affect the need for our
services.
Because
government regulations affect all aspects of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology,
medical device and chemical manufacturing industries, including regulations
relating to the testing and manufacturing of pharmaceutical products and the
disposal of materials which are or may be considered toxic, any change in
government regulations could have a profound effect upon not only these
companies but companies, such as ours, that provide services to these
industries. If we are not able to adapt and provide necessary services to meet
the requirements of these companies in response to changes in government
regulations, our ability to generate business may be impaired.
-8-
If
we are unable to protect our clients’ intellectual property, our ability to
generate business will be impaired.
Our
services either require us to develop intellectual property for clients or
provide our personnel with access to our clients’ intellectual property. Because
of the highly competitive nature of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical
device and chemical manufacturing industries and the sensitivity of our clients’
intellectual property rights, our ability to generate business would be impaired
if we fail to protect those rights. Although all of our employees and
contractors are required to sign non-disclosure agreements, any disclosure of a
client’s intellectual property by an employee or contractor may subject us to
litigation and may impair our ability to generate business either from the
affected client or other potential clients. In addition, we are required to
enter into confidentiality agreements and our failure to protect the
confidential information of our clients may impair our business
relationship.
We
may be subject to liability if our services or solutions for our clients
infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others.
It is
possible that in performing services for our clients, we may inadvertently
infringe upon the intellectual property rights of others. In such event, the
owner of the intellectual property may commence litigation seeking damages and
an injunction against both us and our client, and the client may bring a claim
against us. Any infringement litigation would be costly, regardless of whether
we ultimately prevail. Even if we prevail, we will incur significant expenses
and our reputation would be hurt, which would affect our ability to generate
business and the terms on which we would be engaged, if at all.
We
may be held liable for the actions of our employees or contractors when on
assignment.
We may be
exposed to liability for actions taken by our employees or contractors while on
assignment, such as damages caused by their errors, misuse of client proprietary
information or theft of client property. Due to the nature of our assignments,
we cannot assure you that we will not be exposed to liability as a result of our
employees or contractors being on assignment.
To
the extent that we perform services pursuant to fixed-price or incentive-based
contracts, our cost of services may exceed our revenue on the
contract.
Some of
our revenue is derived from fixed-price contracts. Our costs of services may
exceed revenue of these contracts if we do not accurately estimate the time and
complexity of an engagement. Further, we are seeking contracts by which our
compensation is based on specified performance objectives, such as the
realization of cost savings, quality improvements or other performance
objectives. Our failure to achieve these objectives would reduce our revenue and
could impair our ability to operate profitably.
Our
profit margin is largely a function of the rates we are able to charge and
collect for our services and the utilization rate of our professionals.
Accordingly, if we are not able to maintain our pricing for our services or an
appropriate utilization rate for our professionals without corresponding cost
reductions, our profit margin and profitability will suffer. The rates we are
able to charge for our services are affected by a number of factors,
including:
|
·
|
Our clients’ perception of our
ability to add value through our
services;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to complete projects
on time;
|
|
·
|
Pricing policies of
competitors;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to accurately
estimate, attain and sustain engagement revenues, margins and cash flows
over increasingly longer contract periods;
and
|
|
·
|
General economic and political
conditions.
|
-9-
Our
utilization rates are also affected by a number of factors,
including:
|
·
|
Our ability to move employees and
contractors from completed projects to new engagements;
and
|
|
·
|
Our ability to manage attrition
of our employees and
contractors.
|
Because
most of our contracts may be terminated on little or no advance notice, our
failure to generate new business could impair our ability to operate
profitably.
Most of
our contracts can be terminated by our clients with little or no advance notice.
Our clients typically retain us on a non-exclusive, engagement-by-engagement
basis, and the client may terminate, cancel or delay any engagement or the
project for which we are engaged, at any time and on no advance notice. As a
result, the termination, cancellation, expiration or delay of contracts could
have a significant impact on our ability to operate profitably.
Because
of the competitive nature of the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device
and chemical manufacturing consulting market, we may not be able to compete
effectively if we cannot efficiently respond to changes in the structure of the
market and developments in technology.
Because
of recent consolidations in the pharmaceutical, biotechnology, medical device
and chemical manufacturing consulting business, we are faced with an increasing
number of larger companies that offer a wider range of services and have better
access to capital than we have. We believe that larger and better-capitalized
competitors have enhanced abilities to compete for both clients and skilled
professionals. In addition, one or more of our competitors may develop and
implement methodologies that result in superior productivity and price
reductions without adversely affecting their profit margins. We cannot assure
you that we will be able to compete effectively in an increasingly competitive
market.
Because
we are dependent upon our management, our ability to develop our business may be
impaired if we are not able to engage skilled personnel.
Our
success to date has depended in large part on the skills and efforts of
Elizabeth Plaza, our president, chief executive officer and founder. The loss of
the services of Ms. Plaza could have a material adverse effect on the
development and success of our business. Recently, Ms. Plaza’s employment
agreement automatically renewed through January 2, 2012, and her employment
agreement will automatically renew for successive periods of twelve months
thereafter, unless renewal is declined by the Company or Ms. Plaza no less than
sixty days before the end of any renewal term. Although we have a contract with
Ms. Plaza, this agreement does not guarantee that she will continue to be
employed by us. Our future success will depend in part upon our ability to
attract and retain additional qualified management and technical personnel.
Competition for such personnel is intense and we compete for qualified personnel
with numerous other employers, including consulting firms, some of which have
greater resources than we have, as well as pharmaceutical companies, most of
which have significantly greater financial and other resources than we do. We
may experience increased costs in order to retain and attract skilled employees.
Our failure to attract additional personnel or to retain the services of key
personnel and independent contractors could have a material adverse effect on
our ability to operate profitably.
We
may not be able to continue to grow unless we consummate acquisitions or enter
markets outside of Puerto Rico, the United States and Ireland.
An
important part of our growth strategy is (i) to acquire other businesses which
can increase the range of services and products that we can offer and (ii) to
establish offices in places where we do not presently operate, either by
acquisition or by internal growth. If we fail to make any acquisitions or
otherwise expand our business, our future growth may be limited. The success in
any market will be dependent on such factors as regulatory, tax, political or
economic conditions, our abilities to penetrate the market, hire qualified
personnel in a timely manner, obtain and maintain reasonable labor costs,
generate service revenue volume and profitable margins.
-10-
If
we identify a proposed acquisition, we may require substantial cash to fund the
cost of the acquisition.
Any
acquisitions we make may be made with cash or our securities or a combination of
cash and securities. To the extent that we require cash, we may have to borrow
the funds or sell equity securities. We have no commitments from any financing
source and we may not be able to raise any cash necessary to complete an
acquisition. If we seek to expand our business internally, we will incur
significant start-up expenses without any assurance of our ability to penetrate
the market.
If
we make any acquisitions, they may disrupt or have a negative impact on our
business.
If we
make acquisitions or establish operations in locales outside of Puerto Rico, we
could have difficulty integrating the acquired companies’ personnel and
operations with our own. In addition, the key personnel of the acquired business
may not be willing to work for us. We cannot predict the effect an expansion may
have on our core business. Regardless of whether we are successful in making an
acquisition, the negotiations could disrupt our ongoing business, distract our
management and employees and increase our expenses. In addition to the risks
described above, acquisitions are accompanied by a number of inherent risks,
including, without limitation, the following:
|
·
|
the difficulty of integrating
acquired products, services or
operations;
|
|
·
|
the potential disruption of the
ongoing businesses and distraction of our management and the management of
acquired companies;
|
|
·
|
the potential loss of contracts
from clients of acquired
companies;
|
|
·
|
the difficulty of maintaining
profitability due to increased labor and expenses from acquired
company;
|
|
·
|
difficulties in complying with
regulations in other countries that relate to both the pharmaceutical or
other industries to which we provide services as well as our own
operations;
|
|
·
|
difficulties in maintaining
uniform standards, controls, procedures and
policies;
|
|
·
|
the potential impairment of
relationships with employees and customers as a result of any integration
of new management personnel;
|
|
·
|
the potential inability or
failure to achieve additional sales and enhance our customer base through
cross-marketing of the products to new and existing
customers;
|
|
·
|
the effect of any government
regulations which relate to the business
acquired;
|
|
·
|
potential unknown liabilities
associated with acquired businesses or product lines, or the need to spend
significant amounts to retool, reposition or modify the marketing and
sales of acquired products or the defense of any litigation, whether of
not successful, resulting from actions of the acquired company prior to
our acquisition;
|
|
·
|
difficulties in disposing of the
excess or idle facilities of an acquired company or business and expenses
in maintaining such facilities;
and
|
|
·
|
potential expenses under the
labor, environmental and other laws of other
countries.
|
Our
business could be severely impaired if and to the extent that we are unable to
succeed in addressing any of these risks or other problems encountered in
connection with an acquisition. Further, the commencement of business in locales
where we have no current operations may be subject to additional significant
risks.
-11-
Risks
Concerning our Securities
Because
there is a limited market in our common stock, stockholders may have difficulty
in selling our common stock and our common stock may be subject to significant
price swings.
There is
a very limited market for our common stock. Since trading commenced in December
2006, there has been little activity in our common stock and on some days there
is no trading in our common stock. Because of the limited market for our common
stock, the purchase or sale of a relatively small number of shares may have an
exaggerated effect on the market price for our common stock. We cannot assure
stockholders that they will be able to sell common stock or, that if they are
able to sell their shares, that they will be able to sell the shares in any
significant quantity at the quoted price.
Our
revenues, operating results and profitability will vary from quarter to quarter,
which may result in increased volatility of our stock price.
Our
quarterly revenues, operating results and profitability have varied in the past
and are likely to vary significantly from quarter to quarter, making them
difficult to predict. This may lead to volatility in our share price. The
factors that are likely to cause these variations are:
|
·
|
Seasonality, including number of
workdays and holiday and summer
vacations;
|
|
·
|
The business decisions of clients
regarding the use of our
services;
|
|
·
|
Periodic differences between
clients’ estimated and actual levels of business activity associated with
ongoing engagements, including the delay, reduction in scope and
cancellation of projects;
|
|
·
|
The stage of completion of
existing projects and their
termination;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to move employees
quickly from completed projects to new engagements and our ability to
replace completed contracts with new contracts with the same clients or
other clients;
|
|
·
|
The introduction of new services
by us or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
Changes in pricing policies by us
or our competitors;
|
|
·
|
Our ability to manage costs,
including personnel compensation, support-services and severance
costs;
|
|
·
|
Acquisition and integration costs
related to possible acquisitions of other
businesses;
|
|
·
|
Changes in estimates, accruals
and payments of variable compensation to our employees or contractors;
and
|
|
·
|
Global economic and political
conditions and related risks, including acts of
terrorism.
|
The
issuance of securities, whether in connection with an acquisition or otherwise,
may result in significant dilution to our stockholders.
If we are
required to issue securities either as payment of all or a portion of the
purchase price of an acquisition or in order to obtain financing for the
acquisition or for other corporate purposes could result in dilution to our
stockholders. The amount of such dilution will be dependent upon the terms on
which we issue securities. The issuance of securities at a price which is less
than the exercise price of warrants or the conversion price of securities could
result in additional dilution if we are required to reduce the exercise price or
conversion price of the then outstanding options or warrants or other
convertible securities.
-12-
ITEM
1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.
Not
applicable.
ITEM
2. PROPERTIES.
In
February 2007, we entered into an agreement for our main resource facilities in
Dorado, Puerto Rico with Plaza Professional Center, Inc., a company controlled
by Elizabeth Plaza. These facilities accommodate our testing
laboratory, our customer-specialized training facilities, and our operational
and administrative offices. The agreement is for a five year term, with initial
monthly installments of $18,750, which will increase by 5% annually. The
agreement also requires the payment of utilities, property taxes, insurance and
a portion of expenses incurred by the affiliate in connection with the
maintenance of common areas. The agreement provides for a five year renewal
option.
In March
2010, we moved our U.S. office facilities to Plymouth Meeting, Pennsylvania from
Limerick, Pennsylvania. The three-year term lease for the Pennsylvania office
facilities has monthly rental payments of $2,100.
Our
Ireland office facilities are located in Cork, Ireland. Currently, the
facilities are under a month-to-month lease with monthly payments of
approximately $750.
We
believe that our present facilities are adequate to meet our needs and that, if
we require additional space, it will be available on commercially reasonable
terms.
ITEM
3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS.
From time
to time, we may be a party to legal proceedings incidental to our
business. We do not believe that there are any proceedings threatened
or pending against us, which, if determined adversely to us, would have a
material effect on our financial position or results of operations and cash
flows.
ITEM
4. (REMOVED AND RESERVED)
-13-
PART
II
ITEM
5.
|
MARKET
FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER
PURCHASES OF EQUITY
SECURITIES.
|
Our
common stock has been quoted on the Over the Counter Bulletin Board under the
trading symbol PBSV since December 4, 2006. The table below presents the closing
high and low bid prices for our common stock for each quarter during the two
most recent fiscal years. These prices reflect inter-dealer prices, without
retail markup, markdown, or commission, and may not represent actual
transactions.
Quarter Ending
|
High Bid
|
Low Bid
|
||||||
January
31, 2009
|
$ | 0.59 | $ | 0.27 | ||||
April
30, 2009
|
0.55 | 0.16 | ||||||
July
31, 2009
|
0.40 | 0.30 | ||||||
October
31, 2009
|
0.65 | 0.31 | ||||||
January
31, 2010
|
0.48 | 0.16 | ||||||
April
30, 2010
|
0.35 | 0.10 | ||||||
July
31, 2010
|
0.37 | 0.22 | ||||||
October
31, 2010
|
0.32 | 0.23 |
On
January 27, 2011, the closing price of our common stock on the Over the Counter
Bulletin Board was $0.35 per share and there were approximately 79 holders of
record of our common stock.
Prior to
the acquisition of Pharma-PR in 2006, Pharma-PR was taxed as an N Corporation
under the Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, which is similar to that of an S
Corporation under the Internal Revenue Code. As a result, all of the income from
Pharma-PR was taxed to our then sole stockholder. Other than the distributions
to our then sole stockholder which were made during the period that we were an N
Corporation, we have not paid dividends on our common stock. We plan to retain
future earnings, if any, for use in our business. We do not anticipate paying
dividends on our common stock in the foreseeable future.
Equity
Compensation Plan Information
The
following table summarizes the equity compensation plans under which our
securities may be issued as of October 31, 2010.
Plan Category
|
Number of securities
to be issued upon
exercise of
outstanding options
and warrants
|
Weighted-average exercise
price per share of
outstanding options and
warrants
|
Number of securities
remaining available for
future issuance under
equity compensation
plans
|
|||||||||
Equity
compensation plans approvedby
security holders
|
1,267,882 | $ | 0.6942 | 1,232,118 | ||||||||
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
1,830,991 | $ | 0.0600 | 16,500 |
The
securities issuable pursuant to the equity plan that was approved by security
holders is the 2005 long-term incentive plan, which was approved by stockholders
in April 2006, and amended by stockholder approval in April 2007.
The
equity compensation plans not approved by security holders are (i) warrants to
purchase 1,830,991 shares of common stock issued to San Juan Holdings for
services relating to the acquisition of Pharma-PR and (ii) approximately 16,500
shares of common stock underlying options issuable to
employees.
-14-
ITEM
6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA.
Not Applicable.
ITEM
7.
|
MANAGEMENT’S
DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITIONAND
RESULTS OF OPERATIONS.
|
The
following discussion of our results of operations and financial condition should
be read in conjunction with Part I, including matters set forth in the “Risk
Factors” section of this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and our Consolidated
Financial Statements and notes thereto included elsewhere in this Annual Report
on Form 10-K.
Overview
We are a
compliance services consulting firm with a laboratory testing facility with
headquarters in Puerto Rico, servicing the Puerto Rico, United States and Europe
markets. The compliance consulting service sector in those markets consists of
local compliance and validation consulting firms, United States dedicated
validation and compliance consulting firms and large publicly traded and private
domestic and foreign engineering and consulting firms. We provide a broad range
of compliance related consulting services. We also provide microbiological
testing services and chemical testing services through our laboratory testing
facility (“Lab”) in Puerto Rico. We also provide information technology
consulting services and technical trainings/seminars, which services are not
currently significant to our operating results. We market our services to
pharmaceutical, chemical, biotechnology and medical devices, and allied products
companies in Puerto Rico, the United States and Europe. Our team includes more
than 135 experienced engineering and life science professionals, and includes
former quality assurance managers or directors, and experienced and trained
professionals with bachelors, masters and doctorate degrees in health sciences
and engineering.
During
fiscal 2006 and 2008, respectively, we expanded the markets we serve from Puerto
Rico to the United States and Ireland. Our Ireland operation, with an
Ireland-based management team reporting to our headquarters, achieved a $1.2
million revenue growth in fiscal year 2010 and has established a network of
potential key customers and contacts that serve as the base for our future sales
target and opportunities. We are also actively pursuing to further expand our
United States market.
We have
plans to further penetrate the markets we currently serve. We market our
services with an active presence in industry trade shows, professional
conventions, industry publications and company provided seminars to the
industry. Our senior management is also actively involved in the marketing
process, especially in marketing to major accounts. Our senior management and
staff also concentrate on developing new business opportunities and focus on the
larger customer accounts (by number of professionals or dollar volume) and
responding to prospective customers’ requests for proposals.
While our
core business is FDA and international agencies regulatory compliance related
services, we feel that our clients are in need of other services that we can
provide and allow us to present the company as a global solution provider with a
portfolio of integrated services that will bring value added solutions to our
customers. Accordingly, in fiscal year 2009 we expanded our portfolio of
services to include a laboratory testing facility, an information technology
consulting practice and a training center that provides seminars/trainings to
the industry.
Our Lab
located in Puerto Rico, with an investment of approximately $1.5 million for
microbiology and chemical testing, commenced operations in early fiscal 2009.
The Lab incorporates the latest technology and test methodologies meeting
pharmacopoeia industry standards and regulations. It currently offers services
to our core industries already serviced as well as the cosmetic and food
industries.
We
identified the industry need, and the opportunity to provide, technical
seminars/trainings that will incorporate the latest regulatory trends and
standards as well as other related areas. A network of leading industry
professional experts in their field, which includes resources of our own, were
identified and teamed to provide these seminars/trainings to the industry
through our “Pharma Serv Academy” division. Our goal is to provide these
services and market our company in the markets we currently serve as well as
others.
-15-
In
December 2008, we acquired the operations and assets of Integratek Corp.
(“Integratek”), an information technology services and consulting firm based in
Puerto Rico. Integratek provides a variety of information technology services
such as web pages and portals development, digital art design, intranets,
extranets, software development including database integration, Windows and web
applications development, software technical training and learning management
systems, technology project management, and compliance consulting services,
among others. Integratek is a Microsoft Certified Partner and a reseller for
technology products from leading vendors in the market. Although this operation
is not currently significant to our operating results, our goal is to broaden
the portfolio of services that we can provide to our customer base and also
target other potential customers in other industries.
In line
with the strategy to penetrate the US market, on September 1, 2010, we obtained
the renewal of the certification as a "minority-controlled company" as defined
by the National Minority Supplier Development Council and Growth Initiative
("NMSDC"). The certification allows us to participate in corporate diversity
programs available from various potential customers in the United States and
Puerto Rico.
On July
2008, Pharma-Bio and Pharma-PR obtained a Grant of Industrial Tax Exemption
(“the Grant”) from the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company pursuant to
the terms and conditions set forth in Act No. 135 of December 2, 1997, as
amended. The Grant provides relief on various Puerto Rico taxes, including
income tax, mostly for our new Lab and service activities outside of Puerto
Rico. The Grant is effective as of September 1, 2007 and covers a ten year
period. Activities covered by the Grant are subject to a reduced income tax rate
of 7%.
Although
we believe we have instituted the right strategies to be profitable and seek
growth, we cannot control the fact that the industry and the local and global
economies are undergoing a recession and that has affected our operation and
business growth.
The
reduction in operations of some of our clients, mostly triggered by the global
economic recession and the industry worldwide consolidation, affected our
revenues and growth plans for fiscal years 2010 and 2009, specifically for our
Puerto Rico and United States markets. For the year ended in October 31, 2010
our total net revenues decreased by approximately $0.1 million, or 1.1%, when
compared to last year. In order to maintain volume in the markets we serve and
ensure we are price competitive, we continue to adjust our pricing and gross
margin structure. In addition, since fiscal year 2009 we implemented cost
containment measures and have refocused the overall operations strategy to
reduce our overhead costs. These factors have lead our net income for the year
ended October 31, 2010 to be approximately $372,000, a decline of $163,000 or a
reduction in profit margin of 1.4 percentage points when compared to last
year.
The
following table sets forth information as to our revenue for the years ended
October 31, 2010 and 2009, by geographic regions (dollars in
thousands).
Year ended October 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
Revenues by Region
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||||||
Puerto
Rico
|
$ | 7,532 | 66.4 | % | $ | 8,359 | 72.8 | % | ||||||||
United States
|
1,423 | 12.5 | % | 1,972 | 17.2 | % | ||||||||||
Ireland
|
2,391 | 21.1 | % | 1,148 | 10.0 | % | ||||||||||
$ | 11,346 | 100.0 | % | $ | 11,479 | 100.0 | % |
Weak
economies where we do business and worldwide industry consolidations were
unfavorable factors affecting fiscal year 2010. These factors and the impact
over the industry, if any, of the recently enacted US health care reform
(Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act) and Puerto Rico Act 154 which
imposed temporary excise taxes to the industry we serve, remain as industry
uncertainties that might adversely affect our future performance. We believe
that our future profitability and liquidity will be highly dependent on the
effect the global economy, changes in tax laws and worldwide industry
consolidations will have over our operations, and our ability to seek service
opportunities and adapt to the then current industry trends.
-16-
Results
of Operations
The
following table sets forth our statements of operations for the years ended
October 31, 2010 and 2009, (dollars in thousands) and as a percentage of
revenue:
Year ended October 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Revenues
|
$ | 11,346 | 100.0 | % | $ | 11,479 | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Cost
of services
|
7,953 | 70.1 | % | 7,640 | 66.6 | % | ||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
3,393 | 29.9 | % | 3,839 | 33.4 | % | ||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
costs
|
2,783 | 24.5 | % | 2,923 | 25.5 | % | ||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
6 | 0.1 | % | 52 | 0.4 | % | ||||||||||
Interest
income
|
15 | -0.1 | % | 26 | -0.2 | % | ||||||||||
Gain
on disposition of property
|
2 | -0.1 | % | 6 | -0.1 | % | ||||||||||
Income
before income taxes
|
621 | 5.5 | % | 896 | 7.8 | % | ||||||||||
Income
tax expense
|
249 | 2.2 | % | 361 | 3.1 | % | ||||||||||
Net
income
|
372 | 3.3 | % | 535 | 4.7 | % |
Revenues. Revenues
for the year ended October 31, 2010 were $11.3 million, a decrease of
approximately $0.1 million, or 1.1%, when compared to last year. The net
reduction is mainly attributable to the decrease of approximately $0.7 million
and $0.5 million in the Puerto Rico and the United States market consulting
service revenue, respectively, decrease in Lab revenue for approximately $0.1
million, partially offset by $1.2 million generated by the Ireland consulting
operation.
Decreases
in the Puerto Rico and United States revenue are mostly due to the global
economic recession and the closing of, or decrease in, operations of some
pharmaceutical plants, triggered by operations consolidation. The increase in
the Ireland operation is mostly attributable to consulting volume acquired from
one customer.
Cost of Services; gross
margin. The gross margin for the year ended in October 31, 2010 reflected
a net reduction of 3.5 percentage points when compared to the same period last
year. The decline is mainly attributable to reduced margins attained by our Lab
and consulting business by 2.2 and 1.3 percentage points,
respectively.
The net
decline in the gross margin ratio for the year ended in October 31, 2010, as
compared to last year, is mainly attributable to the Lab’s low gross margin
yield as a function of billings versus fixed costs of services, and low
consulting margins mostly attained by our Ireland operation.
Selling, General and
Administrative Expenses. Selling, general and administrative expenses for
the year ended in October 31, 2010 were approximately $2.8 million, a net
reduction in expenses of approximately $140,000 as compared to last
year.
The
reduction in selling, general and administrative expenses is mainly attributable
to cost containment measures adopted since fiscal year 2009 affecting mostly our
headquarter operations.
Interest Expense. The
interest expense favorable variance for the year ended in October 31, 2010 as
compared to the same period last year was approximately $46,000. Until January
2009 we recognized imputed interest expense incurred in connection with the
long-term obligations originated pursuant to a plan and agreement of merger
dated January 25, 2006 for the acquisition of Pharma-PR. This obligation ceased
when the final installment related to this agreement was made in fiscal year
2009. The expense decreased as annual payments were made through fiscal year
2009.
-17-
Income Taxes Expense.
The decrease in income taxes expense is attributable to the decrease of income
before income tax. The statutory income tax rate differs to the effective rate
mainly due to income tax permanent differences between financial and taxable
books income.
Net
Income. Our net income for
the year ended October 31, 2010 was approximately $0.4 million, a decline of
$0.1 million or a reduction in profit margin of 1.4 percentage points, when
compared to last year. For
the year ended October 31, 2010, earnings per common share basic and diluted
were $0.018 and $0.017, respectively, a decline of $0.008 and $0.007 per share,
respectively, when compared to last year.
Our net
income was affected by the decrease in overall gross margin, partially offset by
cost containment measures, favorable variances in interest expense, and the
reduction of income tax expense due to the decline in taxable
income.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
Liquidity
is a measure of our ability to meet potential cash requirements, including
planned capital expenditures. For the year ended October 31, 2010, we generated
a working capital increase of approximately $0.7 million.
Our
primary cash needs consist of the payment of compensation to our professional
staff, overhead expenses, and statutory taxes. Management believes that based on
current level of operations and cash flows from operations, the collectibility
of high quality customer receivables will be sufficient to fund anticipated
expenses and satisfy other possible long-term contractual commitments for the
next twelve months.
To the
extent that we pursue possible opportunities to expand our operations, either by
acquisition or by the establishment of operations in a new locale, we will incur
additional overhead, and there may be a delay between the period we commence
operations and our generation of net cash flow from operations.
While
uncertainties relating to the current local and global economic condition,
competition, the industries and geographical regions served by us and other
regulatory matters exist within the consulting services industry, as described
above, management is not aware of any trends or events likely to have a material
adverse effect on liquidity or its financial statements.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
We were
not involved in any significant off-balance sheet arrangements during the fiscal
year ended October 31, 2010.
-18-
Critical
Accounting Policies and Estimates
The
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations are
based upon our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”) in the United
States. We believe the following are the critical accounting policies that
impact the consolidated financial statements, some of which are based on
management’s best estimates available at the time of preparation. Actual
experience may differ from these estimates.
Consolidation - The accompanying consolidated financial
statements include the accounts of all of our wholly owned and majority-owned
subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use of
Estimates - The preparation of consolidated
financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted
in the United States requires management to make estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of
contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial
statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the
reporting periods. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
Fair Value of Financial
Instruments - Accounting standards have
established a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to maximize the use
of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring
fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value
hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the
fair value measurement. Accounting standards have established three levels of
inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1:
|
|
Quoted
prices in active markets for identical assets and
liabilities.
|
Level 2:
|
|
Observable
inputs other than Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets
or liabilities, quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or
infrequent transactions (less active markets), or model-derived valuations
in which all significant inputs are observable or can be derived
principally from or corroborated by observable market data for
substantially the full term of the assets or
liabilities.
|
Level 3:
|
|
Prices
or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to
the fair value measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no
market activity).
|
Marketable
securities consist of an obligation from the Puerto Rico Government Development
Bank valued using quoted market prices in active markets with no valuation
adjustment. Accordingly, this security is categorized in Level 1.
The
carrying value of the Company's financial instruments (excluding marketable
securities and obligations under capital leases): cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, are considered
reasonable estimates of fair value due to their liquidity or short-term nature.
Management believes, based on current rates, that the fair value of its
obligations under capital leases approximates the carrying amount.
Revenue Recognition -
Revenue is primarily derived from: (1) time and materials contracts
(representing approximately 85% of total revenues), which is recognized by
applying the proportional performance model, whereby revenue is recognized as
performance occurs, (2) short-term fixed-fee contracts or "not to exceed"
contracts (representing approximately 8% of total revenues), which revenue is
recognized similarly, except that certain milestones also have to be reached
before revenue is recognized, and (3) laboratory testing revenue (representing
approximately 7% of total revenues) is mainly recognized as the testing is
completed and certified (normally within days of sample receipt from customer).
If we determine that a contract will result in a loss, we recognize the
estimated loss in the period in which such determination is
made.
-19-
Cash
Equivalents - For purposes of the consolidated
statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include investments in a money market
obligations trust that is registered under the U.S. Investment Company Act of
1940 and liquid investments with original maturities of three months or
less.
Marketable
Securities -
We consider our marketable
security investment portfolio and marketable equity investments
available-for-sale and, accordingly, these investments are recorded at fair
value with unrealized gains and losses generally recorded in other comprehensive
income; whereas realized gains and losses are included in earnings and
determined based on the specific identification method.
Accounts Receivable -
Accounts receivable are recorded at their estimated realizable value. Accounts
are deemed past due when payment has not been received within the stated time
period. Our policy is to review individual past due amounts periodically and
write off amounts for which all collection efforts are deemed to have been
exhausted. Due to the nature of our customers, bad debts are mainly accounted
for using the direct write-off method whereby an expense is recognized only when
a specific account is determined to be uncollectible. The effect of using this
method approximates that of the allowance method.
Income
Taxes - We follow an asset
and liability approach method of accounting for income taxes. This method
measures deferred income taxes by applying enacted statutory rates in effect at
the balance sheet date to the differences between the tax basis of assets and
liabilities and their reported amounts on the financial statements. The
resulting deferred tax assets or liabilities are adjusted to reflect changes in
tax laws as they occur. A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely
than not that a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
Property
and equipment - Owned
property and equipment, and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Equipment
and vehicles under capital leases are stated at the lower of fair market value
or net present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the
leases.
Depreciation
and amortization of owned assets are provided for, when placed in service, in
amounts sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over
their estimated service lives, using straight-line basis. Assets under capital
leases and leasehold improvements are amortized, over the shorter of the
estimated useful lives of the assets or lease term. Major renewals and
betterments that extend the life of the assets are capitalized, while
expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed when
incurred.
We
evaluate for impairment our long-lived assets to be held and used, and
long-lived assets to be disposed of, whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Based on management
estimates, no impairment of the operating properties was present.
Intangible
assets - Definite-lived intangible assets, such
as customer lists and covenants not to compete, are amortized on a straight-line
basis over their estimated useful lives. We continually evaluate the
reasonableness of the useful lives of these assets.
Stock-based
Compensation - Stock-based
compensation expense is recognized in the consolidated financial statements
based on the fair value of the awards granted. Stock-based compensation cost is
measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is
recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which generally
represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of awards that will be
forfeited. We calculate the fair value of stock options using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model at grant date. Excess tax benefits related to stock-based
compensation are reflected as cash flows from financing activities rather than
cash flows from operating activities. We have not recognized such cash flow from
financing activities since there has been no tax benefit related to the
stock-based compensation.
Income Per Share of Common
Stock - Basic
income per share of common stock is calculated dividing net income by the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted income
per share includes the dilution of common stock equivalents. The diluted
weighted average shares of common stock outstanding were calculated using the
treasury stock method for the respective periods.
-20-
Foreign
Operations -
The functional currency of
our foreign subsidiary is its local currency. The assets and liabilities of our
foreign subsidiary are translated into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect
at the balance sheet date. Income and expense items are translated at the
average exchange rates prevailing during the period. The cumulative translation
effect for subsidiaries using a functional currency other than the U.S. dollar
is included as a cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity and
as a component of comprehensive income.
Our
intercompany accounts are typically denominated in the functional currency of
the foreign subsidiary. Gains and losses resulting from the remeasurement of
intercompany receivables that we consider to be of a long-term investment nature
are recorded as a cumulative translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity and
as a component of comprehensive income, while gains and losses resulting from
the remeasurement of intercompany receivables from those international
subsidiaries for which we anticipate settlement in the foreseeable future are
recorded in the consolidated statements of operations. The net gains and losses
recorded in the condensed consolidated statements of income were not significant
for the periods presented.
New
Accounting Standards
In June
2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) approved the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the single source of
authoritative non-governmental generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
All existing accounting standard documents, such as FASB, American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force and other related
literature, excluding guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”), have been superseded by the Codification. All other non-grandfathered,
non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification has become
nonauthoritative. The Codification did not change GAAP, but instead introduced a
new structure that combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive,
topically organized online database. The Codification is effective for interim
or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, and impacts the our
consolidated financial statements, as all future references to authoritative
accounting literature will be referenced in accordance with the Codification. As
a result of our implementation of the Codification during the quarter ended
October 31, 2009, previous references to new accounting standards and literature
are no longer applicable.
The FASB
issued guidance related to the accounting for business combinations and related
disclosures which is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after December
15, 2008. This new guidance addresses the recognition and accounting for
identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling interests
in business combinations. The guidance also establishes expanded disclosure
requirements for business combinations. Accordingly, we will apply this new
guidance prospectively to all business combinations subsequent to November 1,
2009. The nature and magnitude of the specific effects of this standard will
depend upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions we complete after the
effective date, if any.
The FASB
issued guidance related to the accounting for noncontrolling interests in
consolidated financial statements which is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008. This guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. This guidance requires that noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
be reported in the equity section of the controlling company’s balance sheet. It
also changes the manner in which the net income of the subsidiary is reported
and disclosed in the controlling company’s income statement. Accordingly, we
adopted this new standard effective November 1, 2009. The adoption of this
guidance did not have a significant effect on our financial
statements.
Other
recently issued FASB guidance and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins have either
been implemented or are not applicable to the Company.
-21-
Forward-Looking
Statements
Our
business, financial condition, results of operations, cash flows and prospects,
and the prevailing market price and performance of our common stock, may be
adversely affected by a number of factors, including the matters discussed
below. Certain statements and information set forth in this Annual Report on
Form 10-K, as well as other written or oral statements made from time to time by
us or by our authorized executive officers on our behalf, constitute
“forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Federal Private
Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. These statements include all
statements other than those made solely with respect to historical fact and
identified by words such as “believes”, “anticipates”, “expects”, “intends” and
similar expressions, but such words are not the exclusive means of identifying
such statements. We intend for our forward-looking statements to be
covered by the safe harbor provisions for forward-looking statements contained
in the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995, and we set forth this
statement and these risk factors in order to comply with such safe harbor
provisions. You should note that our forward-looking statements speak only as of
the date of this Annual Report on Form 10-K or when made and we undertake no
duty or obligation to update or revise our forward-looking statements, whether
as a result of new information, future events or otherwise. Although we believe
that the expectations, plans, intentions and projections reflected in our
forward-looking statements are reasonable, such statements are subject to known
and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may cause our actual
results, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future
results, performance or achievements expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements. The risks, uncertainties and other factors that our stockholders and
prospective investors should consider include, but are not limited to, the
following:
|
·
|
Because our business is
concentrated in the pharmaceutical industry in Puerto Rico, and to a
lesser extent in the United States and other countries, any changes in that industry or
in those markets could impair our ability to generate revenue and realize
a profit.
|
|
·
|
Puerto Rico government enacted
ACT 74 of October 22, 2010 may affect the willingness of our customers to
do business in Puerto Rico and consequently affect our
business.
|
|
·
|
Changes in tax benefits may
affect the willingness of companies to continue or expand their operations
in Puerto Rico.
|
|
·
|
Puerto Rico’s economy, including
its governmental financial crisis, may affect the willingness of
businesses to commence or expand operations in Puerto
Rico.
|
|
·
|
Other factors, including economic
factors, may affect the decision of businesses to continue or expand their
operations in Puerto Rico.
|
|
·
|
Because our business is dependent
upon a small number of clients, the loss of a major client could impair
our ability to operate
profitably.
|
|
·
|
Customer procurement and sourcing
practices intended to reduce costs could have an adverse affect on our
margins and profitability.
|
|
·
|
Since our business is dependent
upon the development and enhancement of patented pharmaceutical products
or processes by our clients, the failure of our clients to obtain and
maintain patents could impair our ability to operate
profitably.
|
|
·
|
We may be unable to pass on
increased labor costs to our
clients.
|
|
·
|
Consolidation
in the pharmaceutical industry may have a harmful effect on our
business.
|
|
·
|
Because the pharmaceutical
industry is subject to government regulations, changes in government
regulations relating to this industry may affect the need for our
services.
|
|
·
|
If we are unable to protect our
clients’ intellectual property, our ability to generate business will be
impaired.
|
|
·
|
We may be subject to liability if
our services or solutions for our clients infringe upon the intellectual
property rights of others.
|
|
·
|
We may be held liable for the
actions of our employees or contractors when on
assignment.
|
|
·
|
To the extent that we perform
services pursuant to fixed-price or incentive-based contracts, our cost of
services may exceed our revenue on the
contract.
|
|
·
|
Because most of our contracts may
be terminated on little or no advance notice, our failure to generate new
business could impair our ability to operate
profitably.
|
|
·
|
Because we are dependent upon our
management, our ability to develop our business may be impaired if we are
not able to engage skilled
personnel.
|
|
·
|
We may not be able to continue to
grow unless we consummate acquisitions or enter markets outside of Puerto
Rico.
|
-22-
|
·
|
If we identify a proposed
acquisition, we may require substantial cash to fund the cost of the
acquisition.
|
|
·
|
If we make any acquisitions, they
may disrupt or have a negative impact on our
business.
|
|
·
|
Because there is a limited market
in our common stock, stockholders may have difficulty in selling our
common stock and our common stock may be subject to significant price
swings.
|
|
·
|
Our
quarterly revenues, operating results and profitability will vary from
quarter to quarter, which may result in increased volatility of our stock
price.
|
|
·
|
The issuance of securities,
whether in connection with an acquisition or otherwise, may result in
significant dilution to our
stockholders.
|
ITEM 7A.
|
QUANTITATIVE
AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURE ABOUT MARKET
RISK.
|
ITEM 8.
|
FINANCIAL
STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA.
|
ITEM 9.
|
CHANGES
IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING ANDFINANCIAL
DISCLOSURE.
|
None.
ITEM 9A.
|
CONTROLS
AND PROCEDURES.
|
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate “internal
control over financial reporting,” as defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and
15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act, for the Company. This rule defines internal
control over financial reporting as a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, a company’s chief executive officer and chief financial officer,
to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting
and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance
with generally accepted accounting principles. Our internal control over
financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
•
|
pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and
fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the
company;
|
•
|
provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit
preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company
are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and
directors of the company; and
|
•
|
provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of
unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of the company’s assets that
could have a material effect on the financial
statements.
|
Because
of its inherent limitations, our internal control systems and procedures may not
prevent or detect misstatements. An internal control system, no matter how well
conceived and operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance
that the objectives of the control system are met. Because of the inherent
limitations in all control systems, no evaluation of controls can provide
absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, have
been detected. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future
periods are subject to the risks that controls may become inadequate because of
changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies and
procedures may deteriorate.
-23-
We, under
the supervision of and with the participation of our management, including the
Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, assessed the effectiveness
of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of October 31,
2010, based on criteria for effective internal control over financial reporting
described in “Internal Control — Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee
of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. Based on this
assessment, our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded
that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting
as of October 31, 2010, based on the specified criteria.
Disclosure
Controls and Procedures.
We
carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of
our management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, of the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) as of the end of the
period covered by this Annual Report. Based upon that evaluation, our Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure
controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by
this Annual Report.
Changes
in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Based on
an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our
management, including our Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
there has been no change in our internal control over financial reporting during
our last fiscal quarter identified in connection with that evaluation that has
materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal
control over financial reporting.
ITEM 9B.
|
OTHER
INFORMATION.
|
-24-
PART
III
The
information required by this Item will be included in a definitive proxy
statement, pursuant to Regulation 14A, to be filed not later than 120 days after
the close of our fiscal year. Such information is incorporated herein by
reference.
Information
with respect to our executive officers is included in Part I.
ITEM
11.
|
EXECUTIVE
COMPENSATION.
|
The
information required by this Item will be included in a definitive proxy
statement, pursuant to Regulation 14A, to be filed not later than 120 days after
the close of our fiscal year. Such information is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM
12.
|
SECURITY
OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED
STOCKHOLDER MATTERS.
|
The
information required by this Item will be included in a definitive proxy
statement, pursuant to Regulation 14A, to be filed not later than 120 days after
the close of our fiscal year. Such information is incorporated herein by
reference.
ITEM
13.
|
CERTAIN
RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR
INDEPENDENCE.
|
The
information required by this Item will be included in a definitive proxy
statement, pursuant to Regulation 14A, to be filed not later than 120 days after
the close of our fiscal year. Such information is incorporated herein by
reference.
The
information required by this Item will be included in a definitive proxy
statement, pursuant to Regulation 14A, to be filed not later than 120 days after
the close of our fiscal year. Such information is incorporated herein by
reference.
-25-
The
following documents are filed as a part of this Annual Report on Form
10-K:
|
1.
|
All
Financial Statements: Consolidated Financial Statements are
included herein immediately following the signature page of this report.
See Index to Consolidated Financial Statements on page
F-1.
|
|
2.
|
Financial
Statement
Schedules: None.
|
|
3.
|
Exhibits: The
following exhibits are filed herewith or are incorporated by reference to
exhibits previously filed with the Commission, as indicated in the
description of each.
|
Incorporated By Reference
|
||||||||||
Exhibit
Number
|
Exhibit Description
|
Form
|
File Number
|
Exhibit
|
Filing Date
|
|||||
3.1
|
Restated
Certificate of Incorporation
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
99.1
|
5/1/2006
|
|||||
3.2
|
By-laws
|
10-SB12G
|
000-50956
|
3.2
|
9/24/2004
|
|||||
3.3
|
Amendment
No. 1 to the By-laws
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
3.1
|
6/6/2008
|
|||||
4.1
|
Form
of warrant issued to Investors in January 2006 private
placement
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
4.2
|
1/31/2006
|
|||||
4.2
|
Form
of warrant held by initial warrant holders
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
4.3
|
1/31/2006
|
|||||
4.3
|
Form
of warrant held by San Juan Holdings
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
4.4
|
1/31/2006
|
|||||
4.4
|
Form
of warrants issued to broker-dealers in January 2006 private
placement
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
4.5
|
1/31/2006
|
|||||
4.5
|
Form
of First Amendment to Series C Common Stock Purchase
Warrant.
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
4.1
|
1/29/2009
|
|||||
10.1
|
Form
of subscription agreement for January 2006 private
placement
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
99.1
|
1/31/2006
|
|||||
10.2
|
Registration
rights provisions for the subscription agreement relating to January 2006
private placement
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
99.2
|
1/31/2006
|
|||||
10.3
|
Registration
rights provisions for Elizabeth Plaza and San Juan Holdings,
Inc.
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
99.3
|
1/31/2006
|
|||||
10.4
|
Employment
Agreement dated January 2, 2008 between the Registrant and Elizabeth
Plaza
|
10-KSB
|
000-50956
|
10.5
|
1/31/2008
|
|||||
10.5
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement dated June 9, 2008 between the Registrant and
Elizabeth Plaza
|
10-K
|
000-50956
|
10.5
|
1/29/2009
|
|||||
10.6
|
Second
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 11, 2009, by and between
the Company and Elizabeth Plaza.
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
10.1
|
3/17/2009
|
|||||
10.7
|
Third
Amendment to Employment Agreement, dated March 11, 2009, by and between
the Company and Elizabeth Plaza.
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
10.2
|
3/17/2009
|
|||||
10.8
|
Employment
Agreement Amendment, effective as of January 1, 2010, by and between the
Company and Elizabeth Plaza.
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
10.1
|
1/07/2010
|
|||||
10.9
|
Employment
Agreement Amendment, effective as of July 1, 2010, by and between the
Company and Elizabeth Plaza
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
10.1
|
7/8/2010
|
|||||
10.10
|
Sixth
Employment Agreement Amendment, effective as of August 23, 2010, by and
between the Company and Elizabeth Plaza
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
10.1
|
8/27/10
|
|||||
10.11
|
Employment
Agreement dated January 25, 2006 between the Registrant and Nélida
Plaza
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
99.5
|
1/31/2006
|
|||||
10.12
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated March 11, 2009, by and between the Company
and Nelida Plaza.
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
10.4
|
3/17/2009
|
|||||
10.13
|
Employment
Agreement, dated as of December 31, 2009, by and between Pharma-Bio Serv
PR, Inc. and Nelida Plaza.
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
10.3
|
1/07/2010
|
|||||
10.14
|
Employment
Agreement dated November 5, 2007 between the Registrant and Pedro
Lasanta
|
10-K
|
000-50956
|
10.8
|
1/29/2009
|
|||||
10.15
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement dated December 17, 2008 between the Registrant and
Pedro Lasanta
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
99.1
|
12/23/2008
|
|||||
10.16
|
Amendment
to Employment Agreement, dated March 11, 2009, by and between the Company
and Pedro Lasanta.
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
10.3
|
3/17/2009
|
|||||
10.17
|
Employment
Agreement Amendment, effective as of January 1, 2010, by and between the
Company and Pedro Lasanta.
|
8-K
|
000-50956
|
10.2
|
1/07/2010
|
|||||
10.18
|
2005
Long-term incentive plan, as amended
|
DEF
14A
|
000-50956
|
Appendix
C
|
3/26/2007
|
|||||
10.19
|
Lease
dated March 16, 2004 between Plaza Professional Center, Inc. and the
Registrant
|
SB-2
|
333-132847
|
10.9
|
3/30/2006
|
|||||
10.20
|
Lease
dated November 1, 2004 between Plaza Professional Center, Inc. and the
Registrant
|
SB-2
|
333-132847
|
10.10
|
3/30/2006
|
|||||
10.21
|
Vendor
Agreement dated May 4, 2006 between the Registrant and Schering-Plough
Products, L.L.C.
|
SB-2/A
|
333-132847
|
10.12
|
11/8/2006
|
|||||
10.22
|
Agreement
dated January 17, 2006 between Lilly del Caribe, Inc. and Plaza Consulting
Group, Inc.
|
SB-2/A
|
333-132847
|
10.13
|
11/8/2006
|
|||||
10.23
|
Agreement
effective as of November 1, 2005 between SB Pharmco Puerto Rico Inc. d/b/a
GlaxoSmithKline
|
SB-2/A
|
333-132847
|
10.14
|
10/27/2006
|
|||||
14.1
|
Code
of business conduct and ethics for senior management
|
10-KSB
|
000-50956
|
14.1
|
2/2/2007
|
|||||
21.1*
|
List
of Subsidiaries
|
|||||||||
31.1*
|
Certification
of chief executive officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|||||||||
31.2*
|
Certification
of chief financial officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
|||||
32.1**
|
|
Certification
of chief executive officer and chief financial officer pursuant to Section
906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002
|
|
|
|
|
** Furnished
herewith
Exhibits
10.4 through 10.18 are management contracts or compensatory plans, contracts or
arrangements.
-26-
SIGNATURES
Pursuant
to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of
1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by
the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.
PHARMA-BIO
SERV, INC.
|
||
Dated
: January 31, 2011
|
By:
|
/s/
ELIZABETH PLAZA
|
Name:
Elizabeth Plaza
|
||
Title:
President and CEO
|
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been
signed below by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the
capacities and on the dates indicated.
Signature
|
Title
|
Date
|
||
/s/
Elizabeth Plaza
|
President,
Chief Executive Officer and Director
|
January
31, 2011
|
||
Elizabeth
Plaza
|
(Principal
Executive Officer)
|
|||
/s/
Pedro J. Lasanta
|
Chief
Financial Officer
|
January
31, 2011
|
||
Pedro
J. Lasanta
|
(Principal
Financial and Accounting Officer)
|
|||
/s/
Kirk Michel
|
Director
|
January
31, 2011
|
||
Kirk
Michel
|
||||
/s/
Howard Spindel
|
Director
|
January
31, 2011
|
||
Howard
Spindel
|
||||
/s/
Dov Perlysky
|
Director
|
January
31, 2011
|
||
Dov
Perlysky
|
||||
/s/
Irving Wiesen
|
Director
|
January
31, 2011
|
||
Irving
Wiesen
|
-27-
PHARMA-BIO
SERV, INC.
INDEX
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
Page
|
|
Report
of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
|
F-2
|
Consolidated
Balance Sheets as of October 31, 2010 and 2009
|
F-3
|
Consolidated
Statements of Income for the Years Ended October 31, 2010 and
2009
|
F-4
|
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity for the Years Ended October
31, 2010 and 2009
|
F-5
|
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows for the Years Ended October 31, 2010 and
2009
|
F-6
|
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
|
F-7
|
F-1
REPORT
OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the
Board of Directors and Stockholders of
Pharma-Bio
Serv, Inc.
Dorado,
Puerto Rico
We have
audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc. as of
October 31, 2010 and 2009, and the related consolidated statements of income,
changes in stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years then
ended. Pharma-Bio
Serv, Inc.’s management is responsible for these financial statements.
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial
statements based on our audits.
We
conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company
Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan
and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial
statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to
have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over
financial reporting. Our audit included consideration of internal control over
financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are
appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an
opinion on the effectiveness of the company’s internal control over financial
reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes
examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in
the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and
significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall
financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a
reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our
opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly,
in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of Pharma-Bio Serv, Inc as of
October 31, 2010 and 2009, and the consolidated results of its operations and
its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles
generally accepted in the United States of America.
S/HORWATH
VÉLEZ & CO, PSC
San Juan,
Puerto Rico
January
31, 2011
Puerto
Rico Society of Certified Public Accountants
Stamp
number 2570508 was
affixed
to the original of this report
F-2
PHARMA-BIO
SERV, INC.
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
October 31, 2010 and
2009
October 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
ASSETS:
|
||||||||
Current
assets
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ | 2,317,168 | $ | 2,051,874 | ||||
Marketable
securities
|
95,000 | - | ||||||
Accounts
receivable
|
2,520,407 | 2,034,963 | ||||||
Other
|
270,827 | 298,830 | ||||||
Total
current assets
|
5,203,402 | 4,385,667 | ||||||
Property
and equipment
|
1,321,258 | 1,567,145 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
33,364 | 69,469 | ||||||
Total
assets
|
$ | 6,558,024 | $ | 6,022,281 | ||||
LIABILITIES AND STOCKHOLDERS’
EQUITY:
|
||||||||
Current
liabilities
|
||||||||
Current
portion-obligations under capital leases
|
$ | 18,227 | $ | 43,737 | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
1,205,576 | 1,112,739 | ||||||
Income
taxes payable
|
210,911 | 140,443 | ||||||
Total
current liabilities
|
1,434,714 | 1,296,919 | ||||||
Obligations
under capital leases
|
53,839 | 62,385 | ||||||
Total
liabilities
|
1,488,553 | 1,359,304 | ||||||
Stockholders'
equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
Stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 10,000,000 shares;
none
outstanding
|
- | - | ||||||
Common
Stock, $0.0001 par value; authorized 50,000,000 shares;
issued
and outstanding 20,751,215 shares in 2010 and 2009
|
2,075 | 2,075 | ||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
645,886 | 602,508 | ||||||
Retained
earnings
|
4,440,728 | 4,068,817 | ||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
(19,218 | ) | (10,423 | ) | ||||
Total
stockholders' equity
|
5,069,471 | 4,662,977 | ||||||
Total
liabilities and stockholders' equity
|
$ | 6,558,024 | $ | 6,022,281 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
F-3
PHARMA-BIO
SERV, INC.
Consolidated
Statements of Income
For
the Years Ended October 31, 2010 and 2009
Years ended October 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
REVENUES
|
$ | 11,346,453 | $ | 11,479,083 | ||||
COST
OF SERVICES
|
7,953,647 | 7,640,333 | ||||||
GROSS
PROFIT
|
3,392,806 | 3,838,750 | ||||||
SELLING,
GENERAL AND ADMINISTRATIVE
EXPENSES
|
2,782,916 | 2,923,295 | ||||||
INCOME
FROM OPERATIONS
|
609,890 | 915,455 | ||||||
OTHER
INCOME (EXPENSE):
|
||||||||
Interest
expense
|
(5,605 | ) | (52,394 | ) | ||||
Interest
income
|
14,982 | 26,961 | ||||||
Gain
on disposition of property and equipment
|
1,920 | 6,081 | ||||||
11,297 | (19,352 | ) | ||||||
INCOME
BEFORE INCOME TAXES
|
621,187 | 896,103 | ||||||
INCOME
TAXES
|
249,276 | 361,346 | ||||||
NET
INCOME
|
$ | 371,911 | $ | 534,757 | ||||
BASIC
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
|
$ | 0.018 | $ | 0.026 | ||||
DILUTED
EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE
|
$ | 0.017 | $ | 0.024 | ||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON
SHARES
OUTSTANDING – BASIC
|
20,751,215 | 20,751,215 | ||||||
WEIGHTED
AVERAGE NUMBER OF COMMON
SHARES
OUTSTANDING – DILUTED
|
22,377,734 | 22,324,996 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
F-4
PHARMA-BIO
SERV, INC.
Consolidated
Statements of Changes in Stockholders' Equity
For
the Years Ended October 31, 2010 and 2009
Accumulated
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Additional
|
Other
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Common Stock
|
Preferred Stock
|
Paid-in
|
Retained
|
Comprehensive
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Shares
|
Amount
|
Shares
|
Amount
|
Capital
|
Earnings
|
Income (Loss)
|
Total
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT OCTOBER 31, 2008
|
20,751,215 | $ | 2,075 | - | $ | - | $ | 540,337 | $ | 3,534,060 | $ | (24,692 | ) | $ | 4,051,780 | |||||||||||||||||
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
- | - | - | - | 62,171 | - | - | 62,171 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
- | - | - | - | - | 534,757 | - | 534,757 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FOREIGN
CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | 14,269 | 14,269 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
|
14,269 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
549,026 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT OCTOBER 31, 2009
|
20,751,215 | 2,075 | - | - | 602,508 | 4,068,817 | (10,423 | ) | 4,662,977 | |||||||||||||||||||||||
STOCK-BASED
COMPENSATION
|
- | - | - | - | 43,378 | - | - | 43,378 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
NET
INCOME
|
- | - | - | - | - | 371,911 | - | 371,911 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS:
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
FOREIGN
CURRENCY TRANSLATION ADJUSTMENT
|
- | - | - | - | - | - | (8,795 | ) | (8,795 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||
OTHER
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS
|
(8,795 | ) | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
COMPREHENSIVE
INCOME
|
363,116 | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
BALANCE
AT OCTOBER 31, 2010
|
20,751,215 | $ | 2,075 | - | $ | - | $ | 645,886 | $ | 4,440,728 | $ | (19,218 | ) | $ | 5,069,471 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
F-5
PHARMA-BIO
SERV, INC.
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
For
the Years Ended October 31, 2010 and 2009
Years ended October 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Net
income
|
$ | 371,911 | $ | 534,757 | ||||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income to net cash provided
by operating activities:
|
||||||||
Gain
on disposition of property and equipment
|
(1,920 | ) | (6,081 | ) | ||||
Stock-based
compensation
|
43,378 | 62,171 | ||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
321,713 | 307,332 | ||||||
Imputed
interest expense
|
- | 43,108 | ||||||
(Increase)
decrease in accounts receivable
|
(407,868 | ) | 1,301,996 | |||||
Decrease
(increase) in other assets
|
41,809 | (44,494 | ) | |||||
Increase
(decrease) in liabilities
|
97,326 | (26,258 | ) | |||||
NET
CASH PROVIDED BY OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
466,349 | 2,172,531 | ||||||
CASH
FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Purchase
of marketable securities
|
(95,000 | ) | - | |||||
Acquisition
of property and equipment
|
(45,429 | ) | (290,137 | ) | ||||
Payments
for business assets acquisition
|
- | (150,394 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from sale of property and equipment
|
- | 12,400 | ||||||
NET
CASH USED IN INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
(140,429 | ) | (428,131 | ) | ||||
CASH
FLOW FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Payments
on obligations under capital lease
|
(42,714 | ) | (34,573 | ) | ||||
Payments
to affiliate
|
- | (2,750,000 | ) | |||||
NET
CASH USED IN FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
(42,714 | ) | (2,784,573 | ) | ||||
EFFECT
OF EXCHANGE RATE CHANGES ON CASH
|
(17,912 | ) | 4,057 | |||||
NET
INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
265,294 | (1,036,116 | ) | |||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS - BEGINNING OF YEAR
|
2,051,874 | 3,087,990 | ||||||
CASH
AND CASH EQUIVALENTS – END OF YEAR
|
$ | 2,317,168 | $ | 2,051,874 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTAL
DISCLOSURES OF
CASH FLOW INFORMATION:
|
||||||||
Cash
paid during the period for:
|
||||||||
Income
taxes
|
$ | 157,668 | $ | 289,904 | ||||
Interest
|
$ | 5,605 | $ | 510,799 | ||||
SUPPLEMENTARY
SCHEDULES OF NON-CASH
INVESTING AND
FINANCING ACTIVITIES:
|
||||||||
Property
and equipment with accumulated depreciation of
$12,355
and $98,334 disposed during the years ended
October
31, 2010 and 2009, respectively.
|
$ | 33,695 | $ | 138,180 | ||||
Income
tax withheld by clients to be used as a credit in
the
Company’s income tax returns
|
$ | 71,489 | $ | 18,924 | ||||
Obligations
under capital lease incurred for the
acquisition
of a vehicle
|
$ | 31,918 | $ | 58,970 |
See notes
to consolidated financial statements.
F-6
PHARMA-BIO
SERV, INC.
Notes
To Consolidated Financial Statements
For
the Years Ended October 31, 2010 and 2009
NOTE
A - ORGANIZATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
ORGANIZATION
Pharma-Bio
Serv, Inc. (“Pharma-Bio”) is a Delaware corporation organized on January 14,
2004. Pharma-Bio is the parent company of Pharma-Bio Serv PR, Inc.
(“Pharma-PR”), Pharma Serv, Inc. (“Pharma-Serv”) both Puerto Rico
corporations, Pharma-Bio Serv US, Inc. (“Pharma-US”), a Delaware corporation,
and Pharma-Bio Serv Validation & Compliance Limited (“Pharma-IR”), a
majority owned Irish corporation. Pharma-Bio, Pharma-PR, Pharma-Serv, Pharma-US
and Pharma-IR are collectively referred to as the “Company.” The Company
operates in Puerto Rico, the United States and in Ireland under the name of
Pharma-Bio Serv and is engaged in providing technical compliance consulting
service, and microbiological and chemical laboratory testing services primarily
to the pharmaceutical, chemical, medical device and biotechnology
industries.
Pharma-US
is a wholly owned subsidiary. As of October 31, 2010, it was in development
stage and has not incurred significant revenues or expenses.
SUMMARY
OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Consolidation
The
accompanying consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the
Company and all of its wholly owned and majority-owned subsidiaries. All
intercompany transactions and balances have been eliminated in
consolidation.
Use
of Estimates
The
preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting
principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires
management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of
assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at
the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of
revenues and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results may differ
from these estimates.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
Accounting
standards have established a fair value hierarchy that requires an entity to
maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable
inputs when measuring fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within
the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is
significant to the fair value measurement. Accounting standards have established
three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value:
Level 1:
|
Quoted prices in active markets
for identical assets and
liabilities.
|
Level 2:
|
Observable inputs other than
Level 1 prices such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities,
quoted prices in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent
transactions (less active markets), or model-derived valuations in which
all significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from
or corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term
of the assets or
liabilities.
|
Level 3:
|
Prices or valuation techniques
that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value
measurement and unobservable (supported by little or no market
activity).
|
Marketable
securities consist of an obligation from the Puerto Rico Government Development
Bank valued using quoted market prices in active markets with no valuation
adjustment. Accordingly, this security is categorized in Level
1.
F-7
The
carrying value of the Company's financial instruments (excluding marketable
securities and obligations under capital leases): cash and cash equivalents,
accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, are considered
reasonable estimates of fair value due to their liquidity or short-term nature.
Management believes, based on current rates, that the fair value of its
obligations under capital leases approximates the carrying amount.
Revenue
Recognition
Revenue
is primarily derived from: (1) time and materials contracts (representing
approximately 85% of total revenues), which is recognized by applying the
proportional performance model, whereby revenue is recognized as performance
occurs, (2) short-term fixed-fee contracts or "not to exceed" contracts
(representing approximately 8% of total revenues), which revenue is recognized
similarly, except that certain milestones also have to be reached before revenue
is recognized, and (3) laboratory testing revenue (representing approximately 7%
of total revenues) is mainly recognized as the testing is completed and
certified (normally within days of sample receipt from customer). If the Company
determines that a contract will result in a loss, the Company recognizes the
estimated loss in the period in which such determination is made.
Cash
Equivalents
For
purposes of the consolidated statements of cash flows, cash equivalents include
investments in a money market obligations trust that is registered under the
U.S. Investment Company Act of 1940 and liquid investments with original
maturities of three months or less.
Marketable
Securities
We
consider our marketable security investment portfolio and marketable equity
investments available-for-sale and, accordingly, these investments are recorded
at fair value with unrealized gains and losses generally recorded in other
comprehensive income; whereas realized gains and losses are included in earnings
and determined based on the specific identification method.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable are recorded at their estimated realizable value. Accounts are deemed
past due when payment has not been received within the stated time period. The
Company's policy is to review individual past due amounts periodically and write
off amounts for which all collection efforts are deemed to have been exhausted.
Due to the nature of the Company’s customers, bad debts are mainly accounted for
using the direct write-off method whereby an expense is recognized only when a
specific account is determined to be uncollectible. The effect of using this
method approximates that of the allowance method.
Income
Taxes
The
Company follows an asset and liability approach method of accounting for income
taxes. This method measures deferred income taxes by applying enacted statutory
rates in effect at the balance sheet date to the differences between the tax
basis of assets and liabilities and their reported amounts on the financial
statements. The resulting deferred tax assets or liabilities are adjusted to
reflect changes in tax laws as they occur. A valuation allowance is provided
when it is more likely than not that a deferred tax asset will not be
realized.
Property
and equipment
Owned
property and equipment, and leasehold improvements are stated at cost. Equipment
and vehicles under capital leases are stated at the lower of fair market value
or net present value of the minimum lease payments at the inception of the
leases.
Depreciation
and amortization of owned assets are provided for, when placed in service, in
amount sufficient to relate the cost of depreciable assets to operations over
their estimated service lives, using straight-line basis. Assets under capital
leases and leasehold improvements are amortized, over the shorter of the
estimated useful lives of the assets or initial lease term. Major renewals and
betterments that extend the life of the assets are capitalized, while
expenditures for repairs and maintenance are expensed when
incurred.
F-8
The
Company evaluates for impairment its long-lived assets to be held and used, and
long-lived assets to be disposed of, whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. Based on management
estimates, no impairment of the operating properties was present.
Intangible
assets
Definite-lived
intangible assets, such as customer lists and covenants not to compete, are
amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful lives. The
Company continually evaluates the reasonableness of the useful lives of these
assets.
Stock-based
Compensation
Stock-based
compensation expense is recognized in the consolidated financial statements
based on the fair value of the awards granted. Stock-based compensation cost is
measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award and is
recognized as expense over the requisite service period, which generally
represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate of awards that will be
forfeited. The Company calculates the fair value of stock options using the
Black-Scholes option-pricing model at grant date. Excess tax benefits related to
stock-based compensation are reflected as cash flows from financing activities
rather than cash flows from operating activities. The Company has not recognized
such cash flow from financing activities since there has been no tax benefit
related to the stock-based compensation.
Income
Per Share of Common Stock
Basic
income per share of common stock is calculated dividing net income by the
weighted average number of shares of common stock outstanding. Diluted income
per share includes the dilution of common stock equivalents.
The
diluted weighted average shares of common stock outstanding were calculated
using the treasury stock method for the respective periods.
Foreign
Operations
The
functional currency of the Company’s foreign subsidiary is its local currency.
The assets and liabilities of the Company’s foreign subsidiary are translated
into U.S. dollars at exchange rates in effect at the balance sheet date. Income
and expense items are translated at the average exchange rates prevailing during
the period. The cumulative translation effect for subsidiaries using a
functional currency other than the U.S. dollar is included as a cumulative
translation adjustment in stockholders’ equity and as a component of
comprehensive income.
The
Company’s intercompany accounts are typically denominated in the functional
currency of the foreign subsidiary. Gains and losses resulting from the
remeasurement of intercompany receivables that the Company considers to be of a
long-term investment nature are recorded as a cumulative translation adjustment
in stockholders’ equity and as a component of comprehensive income, while gains
and losses resulting from the remeasurement of intercompany receivables from
those international subsidiaries for which the Company anticipates settlement in
the foreseeable future are recorded in the consolidated statements of
operations. The net gains and losses recorded in the condensed consolidated
statements of income were not significant for the periods
presented.
Subsequent
events
The
Company has evaluated subsequent events through the date the financial
statements were issued. The Company has determined that there are no events
occurring in this period that required disclosure in or adjustment to the
accompanying consolidated financial statements.
Reclassifications
Certain
reclassifications have been made to the October 31, 2009 consolidated financial
statements to conform them to the October 31, 2010 consolidated financial
statements presentation. Such reclassifications do not have effect on net income
as previously reported.
F-9
NOTE
B - RECENTLY ISSUED AND ADOPTED ACCOUNTING STANDARDS
1. In
June 2009, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) approved the FASB
Accounting Standards Codification (the “Codification”) as the single source of
authoritative non-governmental generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP).
All existing accounting standard documents, such as FASB, American Institute of
Certified Public Accountants, Emerging Issues Task Force and other related
literature, excluding guidance from the Securities and Exchange Commission
(“SEC”), have been superseded by the Codification. All other non-grandfathered,
non-SEC accounting literature not included in the Codification has become
nonauthoritative. The Codification did not change GAAP, but instead introduced a
new structure that combines all authoritative standards into a comprehensive,
topically organized online database. The Codification is effective for interim
or annual periods ending after September 15, 2009, and impacts the Company’s
consolidated financial statements, as all future references to authoritative
accounting literature will be referenced in accordance with the Codification. As
a result of the Company’s implementation of the Codification during the quarter
ended October 31, 2009, previous references to new accounting standards and
literature are no longer applicable.
2. The
FASB issued guidance related to the accounting for business combinations and
related disclosures which is effective for fiscal years beginning on or after
December 15, 2008. This new guidance addresses the recognition and accounting
for identifiable assets acquired, liabilities assumed, and noncontrolling
interests in business combinations. The guidance also establishes expanded
disclosure requirements for business combinations. Accordingly, the Company will
apply this new guidance prospectively to all business combinations subsequent to
November 1, 2009. The nature and magnitude of the specific effects of this
standard will depend upon the nature, terms and size of the acquisitions the
Company completes after the effective date, if any. This guidance did not have
effect on the Company’s financial statements.
3. The
FASB issued guidance related to the accounting for noncontrolling interests in
consolidated financial statements which is effective for fiscal years, and
interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning on or after December 15,
2008. This guidance establishes accounting and reporting standards for the
noncontrolling interest in a subsidiary and for the deconsolidation of a
subsidiary. This guidance requires that noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
be reported in the equity section of the controlling company’s balance sheet. It
also changes the manner in which the net income of the subsidiary is reported
and disclosed in the controlling company’s income statement. Accordingly, the
Company adopted this new standard effective November 1, 2009. The adoption of
this guidance did not have a significant effect on the Company’s financial
statements.
4. Other
recently issued FASB guidance and SEC Staff Accounting Bulletins have either
been implemented or are not applicable to the Company.
NOTE
C – MARKETABLE SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE
At
October 31, 2010, the marketable securities of $95,000 consisted of a 5.4%
Puerto Rico Commonwealth Government Development Bank Bond, purchased at par and
maturing in August 2019. The bond balance approximates its fair market value,
therefore no realized or unrealized gains or losses have been
recorded.
The
primary objectives of the Company’s investment portfolio are liquidity and
safety of principal. Investments are made with the objective of achieving the
highest rate of return consistent with these two objectives. Our investment
policy limits investments to certain types of debt and money market instruments
issued by institutions primarily with investment grade credit ratings and places
restrictions on maturities and concentration by type and issuer.
We review
our available-for-sale securities for other-than-temporary declines in fair
value below their cost basis on a quarterly basis and whenever events or changes
in circumstances indicate that the cost basis of an asset may not be
recoverable. This evaluation is based on a number of factors including, the
length of time and extent to which the fair value has been less than our cost
basis and adverse conditions specifically related to the security including any
changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency. As of October 31, 2010
we believe that the cost base for our available-for-sale securities is
recoverable in all material respects.
F-10
NOTE
D - PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
The
balance of property and equipment at October 31, 2010 and 2009 consisted of the
following:
October 31,
|
||||||||||||
Useful life
(years)
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||
Vehicles
under capital leases
|
5
|
$ | 174,142 | $ | 175,919 | |||||||
Leasehold
improvements
|
5-8
|
588,358 | 566,851 | |||||||||
Computers
|
3
|
386,148 | 302,560 | |||||||||
Equipment
|
3-7
|
987,172 | 754,675 | |||||||||
Furniture
and fixtures
|
10
|
120,216 | 119,349 | |||||||||
Projects
in progress
|
-
|
15,329 | 308,541 | |||||||||
Total
|
2,271,365 | 2,227,895 | ||||||||||
Less:
Accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
(950,107 | ) | (660,750 | ) | ||||||||
Property
and equipment, net
|
$ | 1,321,258 | $ | 1,567,145 |
NOTE
E - OTHER ASSETS
At
October 31, 2010 and 2009 non-current other assets included the
following:
October 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Intangible assets:
|
||||||||
Covenant
not to compete (Pharma-PR acquisition), net of accumulated
amortization
of $98,334 and $78,333 in October 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively
|
$ | 1,666 | $ | 21,667 | ||||
Covenant
not to compete (Integratek acquisition), net of accumulated
amortization
of $31,944 and $15,278 in October 31, 2010 and 2009,
respectively
|
18,056 | 34,722 | ||||||
Total
intangible assets net of amortization
|
19,722 | 56,389 | ||||||
Other
assets
|
13,642 | 13,080 | ||||||
Total
non-current other assets
|
$ | 33,364 | $ | 69,469 |
Covenant
not to compete (Pharma-PR acquisition) represents the portion of the payment
made in connection with the purchase of the Pharma-PR stock that was allocated
to a non-competition covenant. Under this agreement, the then sole stockholder
of Pharma-PR agreed not to compete with the Company for a period of five years.
The covenant not to compete of $100,000 is amortized on the straight-line method
over the five-year term of the non-competition covenant.
Covenant
not to compete (Integratek acquisition) represents the portion of the payment
allocated to a non-competition covenant pursuant to the purchase of operations
and assets of Integratek, an information technology consulting firm based in
Puerto Rico. Under the agreement, the stockholders of Integratek agreed not to
compete with the Company for a period of three years. The covenant not to
compete of $50,000 is amortized on the straight-line method over the three-year
term of the non-competition covenant.
Intangible
assets amortization expense for the years ended on October 31, 2010 and 2009
amounted to $36,667 and $88,611, respectively. The amortization expense for the
year ended on October 31, 2009 includes $45,000 for the full amortization of an
Integratek acquired customer list which useful life was
revaluated.
F-11
NOTE
F - INCOME TAXES
On July
2008, Pharma-Bio and Pharma-PR obtained a Grant of Industrial Tax Exemption
(“the Grant”) from the Puerto Rico Industrial Development Company pursuant to
the terms and conditions set forth in Act No. 135 of December 2, 1997, as
amended. The Grant provides relief on various Puerto Rico taxes, including
income tax, mostly for the Company's new microbiological testing facility and
service activities outside of Puerto Rico. The Grant is effective as of
September 1, 2007 and covers a ten year period. Activities covered by the Grant
are subject to a reduced income tax rate of 7%.
For
fiscal years 2010 and 2009 Pharma-PR operations not covered in the exempt
activities of the Grant are subject to Puerto Rico income tax at a maximum tax
rate of 39% as provided by the 1994 Puerto Rico Internal Revenue Code, as
amended.
The
operations carried out in the United States by the Company’s subsidiary are
taxed in the United States. With certain limitations, the Company receives a
credit on its Puerto Rico tax for the federal income tax paid. Also, upon
distribution of earnings by the Puerto Rican subsidiary to its parent those
dividends are taxed at the federal level, however, the parent is able to receive
a credit for the taxes paid by the subsidiary on its operations in Puerto Rico,
to the extent of the federal taxes that result from those earnings (determined
at rates which are normally lower than in Puerto Rico). As a result, the income
tax expense of the Company, under its present corporate structure, would
normally be the Puerto Rico taxes on operations in Puerto Rico, plus 10%
withholding in Puerto Rico from dividends paid to the Puerto Rican subsidiary’s
parent, plus federal taxes on operations in the United States.
Deferred
income tax assets and liabilities are computed for differences between the
consolidated financial statements and tax bases of assets and liabilities that
will result in taxable or deductible amounts in the future, based on enacted tax
laws and rates applicable to the periods in which the differences are expected
to affect taxable income.
As of
October 31, 2010 and 2009, the Company has not recognized deferred income taxes
on $4,701,248 and $4,357,614 of undistributed earnings of its Puerto Rican
subsidiary, respectively, since such earnings are considered to be reinvested
indefinitely. If the earnings were distributed in the form of dividends, the
Company would be subject to a $470,125 and $435,761 tollgate tax,
respectively.
The
reasons for the difference between the provision for income tax applicable to
income before provision for income taxes and the amount computed by applying the
applicable statutory tax rate in Puerto Rico were as follows:
Year ended October 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Theoretical
income tax expense by application of statutory rates to the book pre-tax
income
|
$ | 236,162 | $ | 361,302 | ||||
Benefit
of tax grant
|
- | (1,464 | ) | |||||
Permanent
differences, net
|
13,114 | 1,508 | ||||||
$ | 249,276 | $ | 361,346 |
At
October 31, 2010, Pharma-Bio and Pharma-IR have unused operating losses of
approximately $168,000 and $270,000 after considering various timing differences
for income tax purposes, which result in a potential deferred tax asset of
approximately $57,000 and $34,000, respectively. However, an allowance has been
provided covering the total amount of such balance since it is uncertain whether
the net operating losses can be used to offset future taxable income before
their expiration dates. Realization of future tax benefits related to a deferred
tax asset is dependent on many factors, including the company’s ability to
generate taxable income. Accordingly, the income tax benefit will be recognized
when realization is determined to be more probable than not. These net operating
losses are available to offset future taxable income which expires for
Pharma-Bio in 2027, while for Pharma-IR are available indefinitely.
The
Company files income tax returns in the U.S. in federal and various states
jurisdictions, Puerto Rico and Ireland. The 2005 through 2010 tax years are open
and may be subject to potential examination in one or more jurisdictions. The
Company is not currently under federal, state, Puerto Rico or foreign income tax
examination.
F-12
Effective
November 1, 2007, the Company adopted guidance from the FASB related to Accounting for Uncertainty in Income
Taxes which includes a two-step approach to recognizing, de-recognizing
and measuring uncertain tax positions. As a result of the implementation, the
Company recognized no increase in the liability for unrecognized tax benefits.
Therefore upon implementation, the Company recognized no material adjustment to
the November 1, 2007 balance of retained earnings. By the end of fiscal year
2010, the Company had no significant uncertain tax positions that would be
reduced as a result of a lapse of the applicable statute of
limitations.
NOTE
G - DUE TO AFFILIATE
Pursuant
to a plan and agreement of merger dated January 25, 2006, the Company agreed to
pay its then sole stockholder of Pharma-PR three installments of $2,750,000 on
January 25, 2007, 2008 and 2009, including imputed interest of 6.72%. This last
installment was paid in full during fiscal year 2009.
NOTE
H – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Capitalized lease obligations
- The Company leases vehicles under non-cancelable capital lease agreements with
a cost of $174,142 and $175,919 (accumulated amortization of $108,762 and
$98,715) as of October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively. Amortization expense for
these assets amounted to $22,401 and $36,562 in the years ended October 31, 2010
and 2009, respectively. The following is a schedule, by year, of future minimum
lease payments under the capitalized leases together with the present value of
the net minimum lease payments at October 31, 2010:
Twelve months ending October 31,
|
Amount
|
|||
2011
|
$
|
22,992
|
||
2012
|
22,992
|
|||
2013
|
22,992
|
|||
2014
|
12,745
|
|||
2015
|
636
|
|||
Total
future minimum lease payments
|
82,357
|
|||
Less:
Amount of imputed interest
|
( 10,291
|
)
|
||
Present
value of future minimum lease payments
|
72,066
|
|||
Current
portion of obligation under capital leases
|
(18,227
|
)
|
||
Long-term
portion
|
$
|
53,839
|
Operating facilities - The
Company conducts its administrative operations in office facilities which are
leased under three different rental agreements.
In
February 2007, the Company entered into a lease agreement with an affiliate of
the chief executive officer for the headquarters and laboratory testing
facilities in Dorado, Puerto Rico. The lease agreement is for a term of five
years with monthly rental payments of $18,750, $19,687, $20,672, $21,705 and
$22,791 for each of the years under the lease. The lease agreement ends in
January 2012 and provides a five year-renewal option. The agreement also
requires the payment of utilities, property taxes, insurance and a portion of
expenses incurred by the affiliate in connection with the maintenance of common
areas.
The
Company pays monthly rent of $2,100 for its three-year term leased US office
facilities in Plymouth, Pennsylvania which expires in February
2013.
The
Company maintains office facilities in Cork, Ireland. The facilities are under a
month-to-month lease with monthly payments of approximately $750.
The
Company leases certain apartments as dwellings for employees. The leases are
under short-term lease agreements and usually are cancelable upon 30-day
notification.
F-13
Minimum
future rental payments under non-cancelable operating leases having remaining
terms in excess of one year as of October 31, 2010 are as follows:
Amount
|
||||
2011
|
$
|
295,433
|
||
2012
|
93,572
|
|||
2013
|
8,400
|
|||
Total
minimum lease payments
|
$
|
397,405
|
Rent
expense during the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 was $316,673 and
$386,480, respectively.
Contingencies - In the
ordinary course of business, the Company may be a party to legal proceedings
incidental to the business. These proceedings are not expected to have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s business or financial
condition.
NOTE
I - STOCK OPTIONS AND STOCK BASED COMPENSATION
In
October 2005, the Company's board of directors adopted, and on April 25, 2006,
the Company’s stockholders approved, the 2005 Long-Term Incentive Plan, covering
2,500,000 shares of common stock. The 2005 plan provides for the grant of
incentive and non-qualified options, stock grants, stock appreciation rights and
other equity-based incentives to employees, including officers, consultants and
directors. The 2005 plan is to be administered by a committee of independent
directors. In the absence of a committee, the plan is administered by the board
of directors. Options intended to be incentive stock options must be granted at
an exercise price per share which is not less than the fair market value of the
common stock on the date of grant and may have a term which is not longer than
ten years. If the option holder holds at least 10% of the Company’s common
stock, the exercise price must be at least 110% of the fair market value on the
date of grant and the term of the option cannot exceed five years.
The
Company recognizes stock-based compensation based on the fair value of the
awards. Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the
fair value of the award and is recognized as expense over the requisite service
period, which generally represents the vesting period, and includes an estimate
of awards that will be forfeited.
The 2005
Plan stock options activity and status for the years ended October 31, 2010 and
2009 was as follows:
Year ended October 31,
|
||||||||||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Weighted-
|
Weighted-
|
|||||||||||||||
Number of
|
Average Option
|
Number of
|
Average Option
|
|||||||||||||
Shares
|
Exercise Price
|
Shares
|
Exercise Price
|
|||||||||||||
Outstanding
at beginning of year
|
1,342,913 | $ | 0.6833 | 1,356,772 | $ | 0.7213 | ||||||||||
Granted
|
40,000 | $ | 0.3400 | 220,000 | $ | 0.4545 | ||||||||||
Exercised
|
- | - | ||||||||||||||
Forfeited
|
(115,031 | ) | $ | 0.4437 | (233,859 | ) | $ | 0.6886 | ||||||||
Total
outstanding at end of year
|
1,267,882 | $ | 0.6942 | 1,342,913 | $ | 0.6833 | ||||||||||
Outstanding
exercisable stock options at end of year
|
1,154,547 | $ | 0.7065 | 759,016 | $ | 0.7197 |
October 31,
2010
|
October 31,
2009
|
|||||||||||||||
Weighted
average remaining years in contractual life for:
|
||||||||||||||||
Total
outstanding options
|
1.0
years
|
2.1
years
|
||||||||||||||
Outstanding
exercisable options
|
0.8
years
|
1.7
years
|
||||||||||||||
Shares
of common stock available for issuance pursuant to future stock option
grants
|
1,232,118 | 1,157,087 |
F-14
The
following table presents the stock-based compensation included in the Company’s
consolidated statement of income and the effect in earnings per share:
Year ended October
31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Stock-based
compensation expense:
|
||||||||
Cost
of services
|
$ | 1,846 | $ | 22,386 | ||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
41,532 | 39,785 | ||||||
Stock-based
compensation before tax
|
43,378 | 62,171 | ||||||
Income
tax benefit
|
- | - | ||||||
Net
stock-based compensation expense
|
$ | 43,378 | $ | 62,171 | ||||
Effect
on earnings per share:
|
||||||||
Basic
earnings per share
|
$ | (0.002 | ) | $ | (0.003 | ) | ||
Diluted
earnings per share
|
$ | (0.002 | ) | $ | (0.003 | ) |
As of
October 31, 2010, estimated stock based compensation expense to be recognized in
future periods for granted nonvested stock options amounted to approximately
$12,000. These nonvested stock options compensation expense will be recognized
in a weighted average period of approximately 0.3 years.
The fair
value of stock-based awards to employees is calculated using the Black-Scholes
option pricing model. The Black-Scholes model requires subjective assumptions,
including future stock price volatility and expected time to exercise, which
greatly affect the calculated values. The expected term of the option has been
estimated using the “simplified” method as provided in Securities and Exchange
Commission (“SEC”) Staff Accounting Bulletin No. 107. Under this method, the
expected term equals the arithmetic average of the vesting term and the
contractual term of the option. The risk-free rate is based on the U.S. Treasury
rates in effect during the corresponding period of grant. The expected
volatility is based on the historical volatility of the Company’s stock price.
These factors could change in the future, which would affect fair values of
stock options granted in such future periods, and could cause volatility in the
total amount of the stock-based compensation expense reported in future
periods.
The
following weighted average assumptions were used to estimate the fair value of
stock options granted for the years ended October 31, 2010 and
2009:
Year ended October 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Expected
dividend yield
|
0.0 | % | 0.0 | % | ||||
Expected
stock price volatility
|
135.2 | % | 111.6 | % | ||||
Risk
free interest rate
|
1.5 | % | 1.3 | % | ||||
Expected
life of options
|
3.2
years
|
3.4
years
|
||||||
Weighted
average fair value of options granted
|
$ | 0.2552 | $ | 0.3205 |
As of
October 31, 2010 the outstanding stock options have no aggregate intrinsic value
since the closing stock price on such date was below the exercise price of the
stock options. The aggregate intrinsic value represents the difference between
the Company’s stock price at year end and the exercise price, multiplied by the
number of in-the money options had all option holders exercised their options.
This amount changes based on the fair market value of the Company’s stock. For
the years ended October 31, 2010 and 2009 no stock options were
exercised.
Pursuant
to the acquisition of Pharma-PR, Pharma-Bio agreed that it would issue 100
shares of common stock to each of Pharma-PR's eligible employees. Such shares
will not be issued until Pharma-Bio is eligible to use a Form S-8 registration
statement in connection with the issuance of such shares. Approximately 16,500
shares of common stock may be issued pursuant to this program.
F-15
NOTE
J – WARRANTS
At
October 31, 2010 and 2009 the Company had outstanding warrants to purchase
shares of the Company’s common stock as follows:
October 31,
|
|||||||||||||
Exercise Price
|
Expire Date
|
2010
|
2009
|
||||||||||
Investor
Warrants A
|
$ | 1.1000 |
January
25, 2011
|
3,999,700 | 3,999,700 | ||||||||
Investor
Warrants B
|
$ | 1.6500 |
January
25, 2011
|
3,999,700 | 3,999,700 | ||||||||
Broker
Warrants
|
$ | 0.7344 |
January
25, 2010
|
- | 973,225 | ||||||||
Other
Warrants A
|
$ | 0.0600 |
January
16, 2014
|
249,600 | 249,600 | ||||||||
Other
Warrants B
|
$ | 0.0600 |
January
24, 2014
|
1,830,991 | 1,830,991 | ||||||||
Warrants
Total
|
10,079,991 | 11,053,216 |
NOTE
K – EARNINGS PER SHARE
The
following data show the amounts used in the calculations of basic and diluted
earnings per share.
Years ended October 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
Net
income available to common equity holders - used to compute basic and
diluted earnings per share
|
$ | 371,911 | $ | 534,757 | ||||
Weighted
average number of common shares - used to compute basic earnings per share
|
20,751,215 | 20,751,215 | ||||||
Effect
of warrants to purchase common stock
|
1,626,519 | 1,573,781 | ||||||
Effect
of options to purchase common stock
|
- | - | ||||||
Weighted
average number of shares - used to compute diluted earnings per
share
|
22,377,734 | 22,324,996 |
Warrants
for the purchase of 7,999,400 and 8,972,625 shares of common stock for the years
ended in October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were not included in computing
diluted earnings per share because their effects were antidilutive. In addition,
options for the purchase of 1,267,882 and 1,342,913 shares of common stock for
the years ended in October 31, 2010 and 2009, respectively, were not included in
computing diluted earnings per share because their effects were also
antidilutive.
NOTE
L - CONCENTRATION OF RISKS
Cash
and cash equivalents
The
Company maintains cash deposits in a FDIC insured bank and in a money market
obligations trust, registered under the US Investment Company Act of 1940, as
amended. The bank deposit balances frequently exceeded federally insured limits
during the year. No losses have been experienced or are expected on these
accounts.
Accounts
receivable and revenues
Management
deems all its accounts receivable to be fully collectible, and, as such, does
not maintain any allowances for uncollectible receivables.
The
Company's revenues, and the related receivables, are concentrated in the
pharmaceutical industry in Puerto Rico, the United States of America and
Ireland. Although few customers represent a significant source of revenue, the
Company’s functions are not a continuous process, accordingly, the client base
for which the services are typically rendered, on a project-by-project basis,
changes regularly.
F-16
The
Company provided a substantial portion of its services to three customers, who
accounted for 10% or more of its revenues in either of the years ended October
31, 2010 or 2009. During the year ended October 31, 2010 revenues from these
customers were 21%, 15% and 9%, or a total of 45%, as compared to the same
period last year for 10%, 21% and 17%, or a total of 48%, respectively. At
October 31, 2010 and 2009 amounts due from these customers represented 34% and
39% of total accounts receivable balance, respectively.
NOTE
M - RETIREMENT PLAN
Pharma-PR
has a qualified profit sharing plan in accordance with the provision of Section
l165(a)(3)(A) of the Puerto Rico Code, for employees who meet certain age and
service period requirements. The Company makes contributions to this plan as
required by the provisions of the plan document. Following plan provisions, the
Company temporarily suspended contributions to the plan during fiscal year 2009.
Contributions for the year ended October 31, 2009 were $53,668.
NOTE N - SEGMENT
DISCLOSURES
The
Company’s segments are based on the organizational structure for which financial
results are regularly evaluated by the Company’s chief operating decision maker
to determine resource allocation and assess performance. Each reportable segment
is managed by its own management team and reports to executive management. The
Company has three reportable segments: (i) Puerto Rico and United States
technical compliance consulting, (ii) Ireland technical compliance consulting,
and (iii) a Puerto Rico microbiological and chemical laboratory testing division
(“Lab”). These reportable segments provide services primarily to the
pharmaceutical, chemical, medical device and biotechnology industries in their
respective markets.
The
following table presents information about the reported revenue from services
and earnings from operations of the Company for the year ended in October 31,
2010 and 2009. There is no intersegment revenue for the mentioned periods.
Corporate expenses that support the operating units have been allocated to the
segments. Asset information by reportable segment is not presented, since the
Company does not produce such information internally, nor does it use such data
to manage its business.
Year ended October 31,
|
||||||||
2010
|
2009
|
|||||||
REVENUES:
|
||||||||
Puerto
Rico and United States consulting
|
$ | 7,892,622 | $ | 9,182,572 | ||||
Ireland
consulting
|
2,391,080 | 1,147,642 | ||||||
Lab
(microbiological and chemical testing)
|
740,499 | 812,371 | ||||||
Other
segments¹
|
322,252 | 336,498 | ||||||
Total
consolidated revenues
|
$ | 11,346,453 | $ | 11,479,083 | ||||
INCOME
(LOSS) BEFORE TAXES:
|
||||||||
Puerto
Rico and United States consulting
|
$ | 854,002 | $ | 1,031,324 | ||||
Ireland
consulting
|
22,094 | (39,332 | ) | |||||
Lab
(microbiological and chemical testing)
|
(272,063 | ) | (7,923 | ) | ||||
Other
segments¹
|
17,154 | (87,966 | ) | |||||
Total
consolidated income before taxes
|
$ | 621,187 | $ | 896,103 |
¹
|
Other
segments represent activities that fall below the reportable threshold and
are carried out in Puerto and United States. These activities include a
technical seminars/training division, an information technology services
and consulting division, and corporate headquarters, as
applicable.
|
Long
lived assets (property and equipment and intangible assets) and related
depreciation and amortization expense for the year ended October 31,
2010 and 2009, were concentrated in the domestic markets (Puerto Rico and United
States). The aggregate amount of long lived assets for the international
operations (Ireland) is considered insignificant.
F-17