PHI GROUP INC - Annual Report: 2015 (Form 10-K)

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, D.C. 20549

FORM 10-K

[X] ANNUAL REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended: JUNE 30, 2015

or

[  ] TRANSITION REPORT UNDER SECTION 13 OR 15(D) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from _________________ to _________________

Commission File Number: 2-78335-NY

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act:

(Title of class)

(Title of class)

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act.

Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Act.

Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (ss.232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).

Yes [  ] No [X]

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K (ss229.405 of this chapter) is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of registrant’s knowledge, indefinitive proxy or information statement incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.

Yes [X] No [  ]

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act.

Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).

Yes [  ] No [X]

State the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates computed by reference to the price at which the common equity was last sold, or the average bid and asked price of such common equity, as of the last business day of the registrant’s most recently completed fiscal quarter:

Indicate the number of shares outstanding of each of the issuer’s classes of common stock, as of the latest practicable date: As of September 30, 2015, there were 9,584,675 shares of the registrant's $0.001 par value Common Stock issued and outstanding, including 5,673,327 shares reserved for a special dividend distribution, following a 1:1,500 reverse split which came into effect March 15, 2012.

TABLE OF CONTENTS

The statements contained in this annual report that are not historical facts are “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 with respect to our financial condition, results of operations and business, which can be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “estimates,” “projects,” “plans,” “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “intends,” or the negative thereof or other variations thereon, or by discussions of strategy that involve risks and uncertainties. All forward-looking statements are based largely on current expectations and beliefs concerning future events that are subject to substantial risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from the results suggested herein. Factors that may cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, the company's ability to develop and successfully market the products and services described in this report (and the costs associated therewith); their acceptance in the marketplace; technical difficulties or errors in the products and/or services; the company's customer and active prospect base containing a substantially lower number of interested customers than the company anticipates; the failure to consummate the pending joint ventures and acquisitions at all (or on a timely basis) due to various reasons; difficulty integrating or managing multiple companies from technology, operational and marketing aspects; the success (and cost) of new marketing strategies as a result of mergers and acquisitions; unfavorable critical reviews; increased competition (including product and price competition); entrance of new competitors into the market; timing and significance of additional new product and service introductions by the company and its competitors; general economic and market factors, including changes in securities and financial markets; technology obsolescence, the adequacy of working capital, cash flows and available financing to fund the company's business model and the proposed acquisitions or investments ; and other risks and uncertainties indicated throughout this report and from time to time in the company's releases and filings including without limitation filings with the securities and exchange commission .as used in this report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” the “company” and “PHI” mean PHI Group, Inc. And the term “common stock” means PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock, $.001 par value per share (unless context indicates a different meaning).

PART I

ITEM 1. BUSINESS OVERVIEW

INTRODUCTION

Established in June 1982, PHI Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “PHI”) is a Nevada corporation primarily engaged in energy and natural resources (www.phiglobal.com). The Company has adopted a long-term plan to acquire energy-related assets and other natural resources, partner with other companies to develop energy projects in select geographical areas, and provide renewable energy solutions including bio-mass, wind, solar power and other technologies. The Company also provides corporate finance services, including merger and acquisition advisory and consulting services, and arranges capital for client companies through its wholly owned subsidiary PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. (www.phicapitalholdings.com). In addition, the Company also participates in international trade activity. No assurances can be made that the Company will be successful in achieving its plan.

BACKGROUND

The Company, originally incorporated under the laws of the State of Nevada in June 1982 under the name of JR Consulting, Inc., was initially engaged in mergers and acquisitions and had an operating subsidiary, Diva Entertainment, Inc., which operated two modeling agencies, one in New York and one in California. Following the business combination with Providential Securities, Inc., a California-based brokerage firm, in late 1999 the Company changed its name to Providential Securities, Inc. (Nevada) in January 2000. The Company then changed its name to Providential Holdings, Inc. in February 2000. In October 2000, Providential Securities withdrew its securities brokerage membership and ceased its financial services business. Subsequently, in April 2009, the Company changed its name to PHI Group, Inc. From October 2000 to October 2011, the Company was engaged in mergers and acquisitions advisory and consulting services, real estate and hospitality development, mining, oil and gas, telecommunications, technology, healthcare, private equity, and special situations. Beginning October 2011, the Company discontinued the operations of Providential Vietnam Ltd., Philand Ranch Limited (together with its subsidiaries Philand Ranch - Singapore, Philand Corporation and Philand Vietnam Ltd.), PHI Gold Corporation (formerly PHI Mining Corporation), and PHI Energy Corporation, and has been mainly focusing on energy business and natural resources, including investing in and/or developing energy assets, independent power plant projects, renewable energy, industrial minerals, and international trade. In addition, PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, continues to provide corporate and project finance services, including merger and acquisition (M&A) advisory and consulting services and arranging capital for companies in a variety of industries.

BUSINESS STRATEGY

PHI Group Inc.'s strategy is to:

1. Identify, build, acquire, commit and deploy valuable resources with distinctive competitive advantages;

2. Identify, evaluate, participate and compete in attractive businesses that have large, growing market potential;

3. Design and implement best-of-breed management systems; and

4. Build an attractive investment that includes points of exit for investors through capital appreciation or spin-offs of business units.

SUBSIDIARIES:

Since October 2011 the Company has divested its holdings in other subsidiaries that are not directly related to energy and natural resources in order to focus on its new scope of business. As of the date of this report, the Company owns one hundred percent of PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation, and 51% of Cornerstone Biomass Corporation, a Florida corporation engaged in biomass energy.

PHI CAPITAL HOLDINGS, INC.

PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., a Nevada corporation, was originally incorporated under the name of “Providential Capital, Inc.” in 2004 as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to provide merger and acquisition (M&A) advisory services, consulting services, project financing, and capital market services to clients in North America and Asia. In May 2010, Providential Capital, Inc. changed its name to PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. This subsidiary has successfully managed merger plans for several privately held and publicly traded companies and continues to focus on serving the Pacific Rim markets in the foreseeable future.

CORNERSTONE BIOMASS CORPORATION

Cornerstone Biomass Corporation, a Florida corporation, was set up in January 2015 by the Company and the principals of AG Materials, LLC, an Alabama company, to engage in biomass energy. The Company holds 51% and the principals of AG Materials hold 49% of equity ownership in Cornerstone Biomass Corporation. This subsidiary is currently developing and establishing a 200,000 MT wood pellet plant in Live Oak, Florida. The Company has purchased a 10-acre parcel of land from Klausner Holding USA Corporation in order to build the wood pellet plant next to from Klausner Lumber Mill. Cornerstone has been guaranteed a stable supply of feedstock from Klausner Lumber Mill in Live Oak, Florida for its production of wood pellets.

DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS:

The Company has discontinued the operations of Providential Vietnam Ltd., Philand Ranch Limited (together with its subsidiaries Philand Ranch Ltd-Singapore, Philand Corporation-USA and Philand Vietnam Ltd.), PHI Gold Corporation (now known as NS International Corp.), and PHI Energy Corporation since June 30, 2012.

SPUN-OFF SUBSIDIARIES:

HP.ITA CORPORATION (Formerly PROVIMEX, INC.)

Provimex, Inc. was originally formed on April 10, 2001 under the name “Providential Imex”, to focus on trade commerce with Vietnam. This division changed its name to Provimex on July 5, 2001. Provimex began to generate revenues from its import and export activities in August 2002 through the fiscal year ended June 30, 2005 and incorporated as a Nevada corporation on September 23, 2004. The Company distributed a 15% stock dividend of Provimex, Inc. to shareholders of record as of September 15, 2004. On June 3, 2011, Provimex, Inc. signed an agreement to acquire all the issued and outstanding capital stock of Humex Medical Group Corp., a California corporation, (“Humex”) in exchange solely for a certain amount of shares of Provimex’s common stock, par value 0.001, to engage in stem research and therapy in Southeast Asia. After the merger, shareholders of Humex would own 90% of Provimex Inc. On June 13, 2012 this transaction was rescinded in its entirety effective retroactively June 3, 2011. On June 19, 2012, Provimex, Inc. changed its name to HP.ITA Corporation. On July 20, 2012, HP.ITA Corporation (“HPUS”) signed a Corporate Combination Agreement to acquire all the issued and outstanding stock of HP.ITA Joint Stock Company, a company organized and existing under the laws of Vietnam, in exchange solely for such amount of authorized but unissued common stock of HPUS that would have been equal to 95% of all the issued and outstanding shares of HPUS’s common stock immediately following the issuance of such shares. HPUS intends to complete the required financial audits and file a Form 10 or S-1 registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to become a separate fully reporting publicly traded company in the U.S. As of the date of this report, HPUS has not filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission.

OMNI RESOURCES, INC. (Formerly TOUCHLINK COMMUNICATIONS, INC.)

Touchlink Communications was formed on July 7, 2003 as a division of the Company to provide point-of-sale (POS) terminals and prepaid calling cards to retailers, convenient stores and non-profit organizations across the US. This subsidiary was later incorporated as a Nevada corporation in February 2004 under the name of Touchlink Communications, Inc. as a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company to provide long distance services to residential and business customers in the United States. The Company has declared a 15% stock dividend of Touchlink Communications, Inc. to shareholders of record as of September 15, 2004. On November 03, 2008, this subsidiary changed its name to Vietnam Media Group, Inc. with the intent to develop a multi-media business in Vietnam and subsequently resumed the corporate name of Touchlink Communications, Inc. in February 2011. On April 4, 2014, this company changed its name to Asia Green Corporation (“AGC”) and entered into a business combination agreement with Asia Green Limited Liability Company, a Vietnam-based company, to become a holding company for agroforestry and afforestation business in Vietnam and Southeast Asia. On July 28, 2014, AGC changed its corporate name to Omni Resources, Inc. The Company expects to hold about 10% equity interest in Omni Resources, Inc. following Omni’s recapitalization plan.

STOCK OWNERSHIPS:

CATALYST RESOURCE GROUP, INC. (formerly JEANTEX GROUP, INC.)

As of June 30, 2015, the Company owned 22,535,714 shares of Catalyst Resource Group, Inc. common stock, a Florida corporation, or equivalent to 2.56%.

MYSON GROUP, INC. (formerly VANGUARD MINING CORPORATION)

As of June 30, 2015, PHI Group, Inc. and PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, together owned 38,197,971 shares (approximately 5%) of Common Stock of Myson Group, Inc., a Nevada corporation currently traded on the OTC markets under the symbol “MYSN.”

ITEM 1A. RISK FACTORS

RISK FACTORS

Investment in our securities is subject to various risks, including risks and uncertainties inherent in our business. The following sets forth factors related to our business, operations, financial position or future financial performance or cash flows which could cause an investment in our securities to decline and result in a loss.

General Risks Related to Our Business

Our success depends on our management team and other key personnel, the loss of any of whom could disrupt our business operations.

Our future success will depend in substantial part on the continued service of our senior management. The loss of the services of one or more of our key personnel could impede implementation and execution of our business strategy and result in the failure to reach our goals. We do not carry key person life insurance for any of our officers or employees. Our future success will also depend on the continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified personnel in the diverse areas required for continuing our operations. We cannot assure that we will be able to retain our key personnel or that we will be able to attract, train or retain qualified personnel in the future.

Our strategy in mergers and acquisitions involves a number of risks and we have a limited history of successful acquisitions. Even when an acquisition is completed, we may have to continue our service for integration that may not produce results as positive as management may have projected.

The Company is in the process of evaluating various opportunities and negotiating to acquire other companies, assets and technologies. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of acquired operations and products, diversion of management's attention from other business concerns, amortization of acquired intangible assets and potential loss of key employees of acquired companies. We have limited experience in assimilating acquired organizations into our operations. Although potential synergy may be achieved by acquisitions of related technologies and businesses, no assurance can be given as to the Company's ability to integrate successfully any operations, personnel, services or products that have been acquired or might be acquired in the future. Failure to successfully assimilate acquired organizations could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and operating results.

Acquisitions involve a number of special risks, including:

These risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition since the values of the securities received for the consulting service at the execution of the acquisition depend on the success of the company involved in acquisition. In addition, our ability to further expand our operations through acquisitions may be dependent on our ability to obtain sufficient working capital, either through cash flows generated through operations or financing activities or both. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any additional financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.

As our businesses are currently focused in Southeast Asia, any adverse change to the economy or business environment in these countries could significantly affect our operations, which would lead to lower revenues and reduced profitability.

Our operations are currently concentrated in Southeast Asia. Because of this concentration in specific geographic locations, we are susceptible to fluctuations in our business caused by adverse economic or other conditions in this region, including stock market fluctuation. A stagnant or depressed economy in these countries generally, or in any of the other markets that we serve, could adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.

Risks associated with energy business

As part of our core business involves acquisitions of energy assets as well as production and trading of energy commodities, our profitability will depend on the prices we receive for energy commodities such as coal and wood pellets. These prices are dependent upon factors beyond our control, including: the strength of the global economy; the demand for electricity; the global supply of thermal coal and biomass products; weather patterns and natural disasters; competition within our industry and the availability and price of alternatives, including natural gas; the proximity, capacity and cost of transportation; coal industry capacity; domestic and foreign governmental regulations and taxes, including those establishing air emission standards for coal-fueled power plants or mandating increased use of electricity from renewable energy sources; regulatory, administrative and judicial decisions, including those affecting future mining permits; and technological developments, including those intended to convert coal-to-liquids or gas and those aimed at capturing and storing carbon dioxide.

Risks Related to Our Securities

Insiders have substantial control over the company, and they could delay or prevent a change in our corporate control, even if our other stockholders wanted such a change to occur.

Though our executive officers and directors as of June 30, 2015, in the aggregate, only hold approximately 9.47 % of our outstanding common stock, our Board of Directors is able to decide the rights and terms associated with the Company’s Preferred Stock, which decision may allow the Board of Directors to exercise significant control over all matters requiring stockholder approval, including the election of directors and approval of significant corporate transactions. This could delay or prevent an outside party from acquiring or merging with us even if our other stockholders wanted it to occur.

The price at which investors purchase our common stock may not be indicative of the prevailing market price.

The stock market often experiences significant price fluctuations that are unrelated to the operating performance of the specific companies whose stock is traded. These market fluctuations could adversely affect the trading price of our shares. Investors may be unable to sell their shares of common stock at or above their purchase price, which may result in substantial losses.

Since we do not currently meet the requirements for our stock to be quoted on NASDAQ, NYSE MKT LLC or any other senior exchange, the tradability in our securities will be limited under the penny stock regulations.

Under the rules of the Securities and Exchange Commission, if the price of our securities on the OTCQB or OTC Markets is below $5.00 per share, our securities are within the definition of a “penny stock.” As a result, it is possible that our securities may be subject to the “penny stock” rules and regulations. Broker-dealers who sell penny stocks to certain types of investors are required to comply with the Commission’s regulations concerning the transfer of penny stock. These regulations require broker-dealers to:

These requirements may restrict the ability of broker/dealers to sell our securities, and may affect the ability to resell our securities.

Our compliance with the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and SEC rules concerning internal controls may be time consuming, difficult and costly for us.

It may be time consuming, difficult and costly for us to develop and implement the internal controls and reporting procedures required by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. We may need to hire additional financial reporting, internal controls and other finance staff in order to develop and implement appropriate internal controls and reporting procedures. If we are unable to comply with the internal controls requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act, we may not be able to obtain the independent accountant certifications that the Sarbanes-Oxley Act requires publicly traded companies to obtain.

Our success depends on our management team and other key personnel, the loss of any of whom could disrupt our business operations.

Our future success will depend in substantial part on the continued service of our senior management and founder. The loss of the services of one or more of our key personnel could impede implementation and execution of our business strategy and result in the failure to reach our goals. We do not carry key person life insurance for any of our officers or employees. Our future success will also depend on the continued ability to attract, retain and motivate highly qualified personnel in the diverse areas required for continuing our operations. We cannot assure that we will be able to retain our key personnel or that we will be able to attract, train or retain qualified personnel in the future.

Our service strategy in merger and acquisition involves a number of risks and we have a limited history of successful acquisitions. Even when an acquisition is completed, we may have to continue our service for integration that may not produce results as positive as management may have projected.

The Company is in the process of evaluating various opportunities and negotiating to acquire other companies and technologies. Acquisitions entail numerous risks, including difficulties in the assimilation of acquired operations and products, diversion of management's attention from other business concerns, amortization of acquired intangible assets and potential loss of key employees of acquired companies. We have limited experience in assimilating acquired organizations into our operations. Although potential synergy may be achieved by acquisitions of related technologies and businesses, no assurance can be given as to the Company's ability to integrate successfully any operations, personnel, services or products that have been acquired or might be acquired in the future. Failure to successfully assimilate acquired organizations could have a material adverse effect on the Company's business, financial condition and operating results.

Acquisitions involve a number of special risks, including:

These risks could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition since the values of the securities received for the consulting service at the execution of the acquisition depend on the success of the company involved in acquisition. In addition, our ability to further expand our operations through acquisitions may be dependent on our ability to obtain sufficient working capital, either through cash flows generated through operations or financing activities or both. There can be no assurance that we will be able to obtain any additional financing on terms that are acceptable to us, or at all.

ITEM 1B. UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS.

None.

ITEM 2. DESCRIPTION OF PROPERTIES

For the fiscal ended June 30, 2015 the Company did not own any realty. In February 2015, the Company made a deposit in the amount of $8,224 towards the purchase price of a 10-acre lot of land in Live Oak, Florida but the purchase did not close until the end of July 2015.

ITEM 3. LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

Other than as set forth below, Company is not a party to any material pending legal proceedings and, to the best of its knowledge, no such action by or against Company has been threatened.

LEGAL PROCEEDING SETTLED AND UNPAID AS OF JUNE 30, 2015:

QUANG VAN CAO AND NHAN THI NGUYEN CAO VS. PROVIDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC. ET AL.

This case was originally submitted to Orange County Superior Court, CA on June 25, 1997, Case No. 781121, and subsequently moved to NASD Dispute resolution for arbitration. On or about August 24, 2000, the Company's legal counsel negotiated with the Claimant's counsel and unilaterally reached a settlement without the Company’s prior consent. While the Company was in the process of re-negotiating the terms of said settlement, the Claimants filed a request for arbitration hearing before the National Association of Securities Dealers on October 4, 2000, Case No. 99-03160. Thereafter, the Claimants filed a complaint with the Orange County Superior Court, CA on October 31, 2000, Case No. 00CC13067 for alleged breach of contract for damages in the sum of $75,000 plus pre-judgment interest, costs incurred in connection with the complaint, and other relief. Without admitting or denying any allegations, the Company reached a settlement agreement with the Claimants whereby the Company would pay the Claimants a total of $62,500 plus $4,500 in administrative costs. As the date of this report, the Company has paid $2,500 and is subject to an entry of judgment for $79,000. In May 2011, the Claimants filed an application for and renewal of judgment for a total of $140,490.78. As of June 30, 2015 the Company accrued $172,091 for potential liabilities in connection with this case in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

WILLIAM DAVIDSON VS. DOAN ET AL.

On or about February 01, 2010, the company was notified of a suit that was filed with the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles on November 24, 2009 by William Davidson, an individual against Martin Doan, Henry Fahman, Benjamin Tran, HRCiti Corporation, and Providential Capital, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Defendants” - Case No. BC 426831). Plaintiff demanded an amount of not less than $140,000.00 from Defendants for promissory notes outstanding between Plaintiff and the company.

On July 09, 2012 William Davidson and PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. (formerly Providential Capital, Inc.), a subsidiary of the Company, reached a settlement agreement with respect to whereby PHI Capital agreed to pay William Davidson a total of $200,000 over a period of nineteen months beginning September 1, 2012. Since November 30, 2012, William Davidson has converted portions of the total amount into common stock of PHI Group, Inc. in lieu of cash payment. The Company has accrued the required liabilities associated with the balance of these notes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2015.

ITEM 4. SUBMISSION OF MATTERS TO A VOTE OF SECURITY HOLDERS

None

PART II

ITEM 5. MARKET FOR COMMON EQUITY AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

The Company's Common Stock is currently trading on the OTC Markets under the symbol “PHIL”. The following sets forth the high and low prices of the Company’s Common Stock in the US for the most recent month, two most recent quarters and each quarter during the preceding two fiscal years.

The prices for the Company’s common stock quoted by brokers are not necessarily a reliable indication of the value of the Company’s common stock.

Holders of Common Equity:

There are approximately 1,270 shareholders of record of the Company’s common stock.

Dividends:

Cash dividend: The Company has not declared or paid a cash dividend to common stock shareholders since the Company’s inception. The Board of Directors presently intends to retain any earnings to finance company operations and does not expect to authorize cash dividends to common shareholders in the foreseeable future. Any payment of cash dividends in the future will depend upon Company’s earnings, capital requirements and other factors.

Share dividend: On March 12, 2012 the Board of Directors of the Company declared a special stock dividend to shareholders of Common Stock of the Company with the following stipulations: (a) Declaration date: March 16, 2012; (b) Record date: June 15, 2012; (c) Payment date: September 17, 2012; (d) Dividend ratio: All eligible shareholders of Common Stock of the Company as of the Record date shall receive three new shares of Common Stock of the Company for each share held by such shareholders as of the referenced record date. The purpose of this special stock dividend was to partially mitigate the impact of the dilution in connection with the 1-for-1,500 reverse split of the Common Stock on the Company’s long-term shareholders and reward them for staying with the Company. On June 6, 2012, the Company’s Board of Directors passed a resolution to change the record date for the special stock dividend to July 31, 2012 and the distribution date to November 30, 2012. The Company has reserved a total of 5,673,327 shares of Common Stock for this special dividend distribution and will reset a new distribution date when a registration statement for the dividend shares is declared effective by the Securities and Exchange Commission.

ITEM 6. SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

* Note: Net loss per share adjusted for 1:1,500 reverse split of shares issued and outstanding.

ITEM 7. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS

Except for the audited historical information contained herein, this report specifies forward-looking statements of management of the Company within the meaning of Section 27a of the Securities Act of 1933 and Section 21e of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (“forward-looking statements”) including, without limitation, forward-looking statements regarding the Company’s expectations, beliefs, intentions and future strategies. Forward-looking statements are statements that estimate the happening of future events and are not based on historical facts. Forward- looking statements may be identified by the use of forward-looking terminology, such as “could”, “may”, “will”, “expect”, “shall”, “estimate”, “anticipate”, “probable”, “possible”, “should”, “continue”, “intend” or similar terms, variations of those terms or the negative of those terms. The forward-looking statements specified in this report have been compiled by management of the Company on the basis of assumptions made by management and considered by management to be reasonable. Future operating results of the Company, however, are impossible to predict and no representation, guaranty, or warranty is to be inferred from those forward-looking statements. The assumptions used for purposes of the forward-looking statements specified in this report represent estimates of future events and are subject to uncertainty as to possible changes in economic, legislative, industry, and other circumstances. As a result, the identification and interpretation of data and other information and their use in developing and selecting assumptions from and among reasonable alternatives require the exercise of judgment. To the extent that the assumed events do not occur, the outcome may vary substantially from anticipated or projected results, and, accordingly, no opinion is expressed on the achievability of those forward-looking statements. In addition, those forward-looking statements have been compiled as of the date of this report and should be evaluated with consideration of any changes occurring after the date of this report. No assurance can be given that any of the assumptions relating to the forward-looking statements specified in this report are accurate and the Company assumes no obligation to update any such forward-looking statements.

RESULTS OF OPERATIONS FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 AND JUNE 30, 2014

Revenues:

The Company generated $127,178 in revenues from consulting, advisory and management services during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, as compared to $77,430 in revenue for the year ended June 30, 2014.

Operating Expenses:

The Company incurred total operating expenses of $433,090 for the year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to $381,482 for the year ended June 30, 2014. This represents an increase of $51,609 or 13.53% in total operating expenses from the prior year. The increase was primarily due to an increase of $34,136 in professional services and an increase of $21,334 in general and administrative expenses. The Company utilized more third-party professional services and incurred additional travel expenses during the current year relative to the previous fiscal year.

Income (loss) from operations:

The Company had a loss from operations of $305,912 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to a loss from operations of $304,042 for the year ended June 30, 2014. This represents an increase of $1,870 or 0.62% in loss from operations during the current year as compared to that of the precious year. This was mainly due to the fact that the Company generated an additional amount of $49,739 in revenues and at the same time incurred an additional amount of $51,609 in total operating expenses during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to the corresponding items during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

Other income (expense)

The Company had a net other expense of $1,063,003 for the year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to net other income of $48,048 for the prior year. This was primarily due to the fact the Company had an interest expense of $319,315, a loss on sale of marketable securities in the amount of $45,176, a loss on settlement of debts in the amount of $25,845 and other expense in the amount of $672,667, which comprises of an impairment of marketable securities in the amount of $599,472, a write-off of other receivable in the amount of $73,043, and net miscellaneous other expense of $152 in the current year, whereas it had an interest expense of $323,782 and a gain of $372,278 from settlement of debts for the year ended June 30, 2014.

Net income (loss):

The Company had net loss of $1,368,915 for the year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to a net loss of $255,994 for the year ended June 30, 2014. The Company recorded a loss on sale of marketable securities of $45,176 during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, compared to a loss on sale of marketable securities of $30 during the previous fiscal year. Interest expenses were $319,315 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, compared to $323,782 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014. The increase of $1,112,921 is primarily due to a non-cash impairment of marketable securities in the amount of $599,472, a write-off of other receivable in the amount of $73,043, a decrease of $4,467 in interest expense, a net loss on sale of marketable securities in the amount of $45,176 and a loss on settlement of debts in the amount of $25,845 during the current fiscal year as compared to a gain of $372,278 from settlement of debts for the year ended June 30, 2014. The net loss based on the basic and diluted weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the year ended June 30, 2015 was ($0.121 as compared to ($0.04) for the year ended June 30, 2014.

CASH FLOWS

We had $10,654 in cash and cash equivalents of as of June 30, 2015, as compared to $30,623 in cash and cash equivalents as of June 30, 2014, respectively.

Net cash used in our operating activities was $1,609,353 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to net cash used in operating activities of $979,676 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The underlying reasons for the increase in net cash used in operating activities between the two periods were mainly due to net increase of $1,112,921 in net loss from operations, an increase of $109,964 in other assets and prepaid expenses, and a net decrease of $593,207 in accounts payable and accrued expenses between the current fiscal year and the previous fiscal year.

Net cash provided by investing activities was $65,557 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to cash provided by investing activities of $99,160 for the year ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The underlying reasons for the decrease in net cash provided by investing activities between the two fiscal years were primarily due to a cancellation of $73,043 from discontinued operations, a net deposit of $4,936 for acquisition and investment in a joint venture during in the amount of $2,550 during the year ended June 30, 2015, as compared to receipts of $99,160 from discontinued operations during the year ended June 30, 2014, respectively.

Net cash provided by financing activities was $1,523,827 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 as compared to cash provided by financing activities of $911,139 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014, respectively. The underlying reasons for the increase in cash provided by financing activities during the current fiscal year were mainly due to a $258,763 decrease of proceeds from common stock between the current and the previous fiscal years, an increase of $808,524 in other accumulated comprehensive income, and a decrease in accumulated deficit in the amount of $639,376 in the current fiscal year, compared to and a decrease in minority interest of $704,205 and payments on notes payable of $127,756 during the prior fiscal year.

HISTORICAL FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS:

SHORT TERM NOTES PAYABLE AND ISSUANCE OF COMMON STOCK: In the course of its business, the Company has obtained short-term loans from individuals and institutional investors and from time to time raised money by issuing restricted common stock of the Company under the auspices of Rule 144. As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company had short-term notes payable amounting to $1,342,618 and $1,346,721 with accrued interest of $3,031,152 and $2,874,509, respectively. These notes bear interest rates ranging from 0% to 36% per annum. During the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014, the Company paid $31,500 and $127,755 of principal and $4,956 and $89,440 of interest on the short-term notes, respectively. Some of the notes payable are secured by assets of the Company as summarized below:

DUE TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS: The Company classified $215,000 of preferred stock previously subscribed in one of its long discontinued subsidiaries as a current liability payable to holders of preferred stock in this subsidiary due to deficiencies in connection with previous preferred share subscription agreements. This amount was past due as of June 30, 2015.

The interest payable to holders of preferred stock of the above-mentioned discontinued subsidiary in the amounts of $387,455 and $361,655 has been included in accrued interest included in account payable and accrued expenses on the balance sheet as of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014.

COMPANY’S PLAN OF OPERATION FOR THE FOLLOWING 12 MONTHS

While our current scope of business primarily focuses on energy and natural resources, we also engage in international trade with the Company’s key partners and continue to provide corporate finance and project financing, including merger and acquisition advisory and consulting services through our subsidiary PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. For the following twelve months commencing July 1, 2015, the Company intends to implement a number of plans, including the following:

FINANCIAL PLANS

MATERIAL CASH REQUIREMENTS: We must raise substantial amounts of capital to fulfill our plan of acquiring energy-related and natural resource assets as part of our scope of business. We intend to use equity, debt and project financing to meet our capital needs for acquisitions.

Management has taken action and formulated plans to strengthen the Company's working capital position and generate sufficient cash to meet its operating needs through June 30, 2016 and beyond. The working capital cash requirements for the next 12 months following the end of the current fiscal year are expected to be generated from operations, sale of marketable securities and additional financing. The Company plans to generate revenues from its consulting services, merger and acquisition advisory services, trading activity and joint operations with other companies.

AVAILABLE FUTURE FINANCING ARRANGEMENTS: The Company has engaged a number of investment banking firms, worked with some commercial banks and negotiated with private equity firms to arrange financing for potential acquisitions. In addition, the Company is in the process of raising $60 million by offering investment units consisting of cumulative convertible preferred stock and warrants under the auspices of Regulation 506(c). The Company believes it will be able to secure the required capital to implement its business plan; however, no assurances could be made that management would be successful in achieving its plan.

ITEM 7A. QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

The following discussion about PHI Group Inc.’s market risk involves forward-looking statements. Actual results could differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements.

Currency Fluctuations and Foreign Currency Risk

Some of our operations are conducted in Vietnam and Indonesia, using Vietnamese Dong and Indonesian Rupiah, which are the official currencies of these countries. The effect of the fluctuations of exchange rates is considered minimal to our business operations.

Interest Rate Risk

We do not have significant interest rate risk, as most of our debt obligations are primarily short-term in nature to individuals, with fixed interest rates.

Valuation of Securities Risk

Since majority of our income is paid with the marketable securities, the value of our assets may fluctuate significantly depending on the market value of the securities we hold.

ITEM 8. FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

PHI GROUP, INC.

INDEX TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

INDEPENDENT AUDITOR’S REPORT

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

PHI Group, Inc. (formerly Providential Holdings, Inc.)

Independent Auditors’ Report

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of PHI Group, Inc. (a Nevada corporation) and its subsidiary as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 and the related consolidated statements of operations, stockholders’ equity, and cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

Management’s Responsibility for the Financial Statements

Management is responsible for the preparation and fair presentation of these financial statements in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America; this includes the design, implementation, and maintenance of internal control relevant to the preparation and fair presentation of financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.

Auditor’s Responsibility

Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of Public Company Auditing Oversight Board. Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free from material misstatement.

An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. The procedures selected depend on the auditor’s judgment, including the assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk assessments, the auditor considers internal control relevant to the entity’s preparation and fair presentation of the financial statements in order to design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the entity’s internal control. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the reasonableness of significant accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall presentation of the financial statements.

We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.

Opinion

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of PHI Group, Inc. and subsidiary as of June 30, 2015 and 2014 and the results of its consolidated operations and its cash flows for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the generally accepted accounting principles applicable to a going concern, which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has accumulated deficit of $37,679,736 and a negative cash flow from operations amounting to $1,368,915 for the year ended June 30, 2015. These factors as discussed in Note 21 of the consolidated financial statements raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 21. The consolidated financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of these uncertainties.

PHI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

(AUDITED)

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements

PHI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF OPERATIONS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 AND 2014

AUDITED

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements

PHI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

STATEMENT OF STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY (DEFICIT)

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 AND 2014

(Audited)

The accompanying notes form an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements

PHI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

FOR THE YEARS ENDED JUNE 30, 2015 AND 2014

(AUDITED)

 The accompanying notes form an integral part of these audited consolidated financial statements

PHI GROUP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARIES

(FORMERLY PROVIDENTIAL HOLDINGS, INC.)

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

NOTE 1 – NATURE OF BUSINESS

Established in June 1982, PHI Group, Inc. (the “Company” or “PHI”) is a Nevada corporation primarily engaged in energy and natural resources (www.phiglobal.com). The Company has adopted a long-term plan to acquire energy-related assets and other natural resources, partner with other companies to develop energy projects in select geographical areas, and provide renewable energy solutions including bio-mass, wind, solar power and other technologies. The Company also provides corporate finance services, including merger and acquisition advisory and consulting services, and arranges capital for client companies through its wholly owned subsidiary PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. (www.phicapitalholdings.com). In addition, the Company also participates in international trade activity.

The Company, originally incorporated under the name of JR Consulting, Inc., was initially engaged in mergers and acquisitions and had an operating subsidiary, Diva Entertainment, Inc., which operated two modeling agencies, one in New York and one in California. Following the business combination with Providential Securities, Inc., a California-based brokerage firm, in late 1999 the Company changed its name to Providential Securities, Inc. (Nevada) in January 2000. The Company then changed its name to Providential Holdings, Inc. in February 2000. In October 2000, Providential Securities withdrew its securities brokerage membership and ceased its financial services business. Subsequently, in April 2009, the Company changed its name to PHI Group, Inc. From October 2000 to October 2011, the Company was engaged in mergers and acquisitions advisory and consulting services, real estate and hospitality development, mining, oil and gas, telecommunications, technology, healthcare, private equity, and special situations. Beginning October 2011, the Company discontinued the operations of Providential Vietnam Ltd., Philand Ranch Limited (together with its subsidiaries Philand Ranch - Singapore, Philand Corporation and Philand Vietnam Ltd.), PHI Gold Corporation (formerly PHI Mining Corporation), and PHI Energy Corporation, and has been mainly focusing on energy business and natural resources, including investing in and/or developing energy assets, independent power plant projects, renewable energy, industrial minerals, and international trade. In addition, PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, continues to provide corporate and project finance services, including merger and acquisition (M&A) advisory and consulting services and arranging capital for companies in a variety of industries. No assurances can be made that the Company will be successful in achieving its plan.

NOTE 2 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

PRINCIPLES OF CONSOLIDATION

The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of PHI Group, Inc., its wholly owned subsidiary PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., and its discontinued operations Providential Securities, Inc., PHI Energy Corporation, PHI Gold Corp, Providential Vietnam Ltd. and Philand Ranch Limited (including its 100% owned subsidiary Philand Corporation and Philand Vietnam Ltd), collectively referred to as the “Company”. All significant inter-company transactions have been eliminated in consolidation. Provimex, Inc. and Touchlink Communications are inactive.

USE OF ESTIMATES

The preparation of consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS

The Company considers all liquid investments with a maturity of three months or less from the date of purchase that are readily convertible into cash to be cash equivalents.

MARKETABLE SECURITIES

The Company’s securities are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, are carried at fair value. Securities classified as available-for-sale may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs, and for other purposes.

Each investment in marketable securities represents less than twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding common stock and stock equivalents of the investee, and each security is nationally quoted on the FINRA’S OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) or the OTC Markets. As such, each investment is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of ASC 320 (previously SFAS No. 115).

Unrealized holding gains and losses for available-for-sale securities are excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of stockholder’s equity. Realized gains and losses for securities classified as available-for-sale are reported in earnings based upon the adjusted cost of the specific security sold. On June 30, 2015 and 2014 the marketable securities have been recorded at $350,556 and $261,360, respectively based upon the fair value of the marketable securities at that time.

ACCOUNTS RECEIVABLE

Management reviews the composition of accounts receivable and analyzes historical bad debts. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had no accounts receivable.

IMPAIRMENT OF LONG-LIVED ASSETS

Effective January 1, 2002, the Company adopted ASC 350 (Previously SFAS 144, “Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets”), which addresses financial accounting and reporting for the impairment or disposal of long-lived assets and supersedes SFAS No. 121, “Accounting for the Impairment of Long-Lived Assets and for Long-Lived Assets to be Disposed Of,” and the accounting and reporting provisions of APB Opinion No. 30, “Reporting the Results of Operations for a Disposal of a Segment of a Business.” The Company periodically evaluates the carrying value of long-lived assets to be held and used in accordance with ASC 350. ASC 350 requires impairment losses to be recorded on long-lived assets used in operations when indicators of impairment are present and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the assets’ carrying amounts. In that event, a loss is recognized based on the amount by which the carrying amount exceeds the fair market value of the long-lived assets. Loss on long-lived assets to be disposed of is determined in a similar manner, except that fair market values are reduced for the cost of disposal.

PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

Property and equipment are stated at cost. Maintenance and repair costs are charged to expense as incurred; costs of major additions and betterments are capitalized. When property and equipment are sold or otherwise disposed of, the cost and related accumulated depreciation are eliminated from the accounts and any resulting gain or loss is reflected in income. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over the estimated useful lives of the assets, ranging from three to ten years.

DEPRECIATION AND AMORTIZATION

The cost of property and equipment is depreciated over the estimated useful lives of the related assets. Depreciation and amortization of fixed assets are computed on a straight-line basis.

NET EARNINGS (LOSS) PER SHARE

The Company adopted the provisions of ASC 260 (previously SFAS 128). ASC 260 eliminates the presentation of primary and fully diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) and requires presentation of basic and diluted EPS. Basic EPS is computed by dividing income (loss) available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period and common stock equivalents outstanding at the end of the period.

The net earnings (loss) per share is computed as follows:

STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION

Effective July 1, 2006, the Company adopted ASC 718-10-25 (previously SFAS 123R) and accordingly has adopted the modified prospective application method. Under this method, ASC 718-10-25 is applied to new awards and to awards modified, repurchased, or cancelled after the effective date. Additionally, compensation cost for the portion of awards that are outstanding as of the date of adoption for which the requisite service has not been rendered (such as unvested options) is recognized over a period of time as the remaining requisite services are rendered.

FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS

Fair Value - Definition and Hierarchy

Fair value is defined as the price that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Assets and liabilities measured at fair value are categorized based on whether or not the inputs are observable in the market and the degree that the inputs are observable. The categorization of financial assets and liabilities within the valuation hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

A fair value hierarchy for inputs is used in measuring fair value that maximizes the use of observable inputs and minimizes the use of unobservable inputs by requiring that the most observable inputs are to be used when available.

Valuation techniques that are consistent with the market or income approach are used to measure fair value. The fair value hierarchy is categorized into three levels based on the inputs as follows:

Level 1 - Valuations based on unadjusted quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities that the Fund has the ability to access.

Level 2 - Valuations based on inputs other than quoted prices included in Level 1 that are observable, either directly or indirectly.

Level 3 - Valuations based on inputs that are unobservable and significant to the overall fair value measurement.

Fair value is a market-based measure, based on assumptions of prices and inputs considered from the perspective of a market participant that are current as of the measurement date, rather than an entity-specific measure. Therefore, even when market assumptions are not readily available, the Company’s own assumptions are set to reflect those that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability at the measurement date. The availability of valuation techniques and observable inputs can vary from investment to investment and are affected by a wide variety of factors, including; type of investment, whether the investment is new and not yet established in the marketplace, the liquidity of markets, and other characteristics particular to the transaction.

To the extent that valuation is based upon models or inputs that are less observable or unobservable in the market, the determination of fair value requires more judgment. Because of the inherent uncertainty of valuation, those estimated values may be materially higher or lower than the values that would have been used had a ready market for the investments existed. Accordingly, the degree of judgment exercised by the Fund in determining fair value is greatest for investments categorized in Level 3. In certain cases, the inputs used to measure fair value may fall into different levels of the fair value hierarchy. In such cases, the level in the fair value hierarchy in which the fair value measurement falls in its entirety is determined based upon the lowest level input that is significant to the fair value measurement.

Fair Value - Valuation Techniques and Inputs

The Company holds and may invest public securities traded on public exchanges or over-the-counter (OTC), private securities, real estate, convertible securities, interest bearing securities and other types of securities and has adopted specific techniques for their respective valuations.

Equity Securities in Public Companies

Unrestricted

The Company values investments in securities that are freely tradable and listed on major securities exchanges at their last reported sales price as of the valuation date. To the extent these securities are actively traded and valuation adjustments are not applied, they are categorized in Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy.

Securities traded on inactive markets or valued by reference to similar instruments are generally categorized in Level 2 or 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

Restricted

Securities traded on public exchanges or over-the-counter (OTC) where there are formal restrictions that limit (i.e. Rule 144 holding periods and underwriter’s lock-ups) their sale shall be valued at the closing price on the date of valuation less applicable discounts. The Company may apply a discount to securities with Rule 144 restrictions. Additional discounts may be assessed if the Company believes there are other mitigating factors which warrant the additional discounting. When determining potential additional discounts, factors that will be taken into consideration include, but are not limited to; securities’ trading characteristics, volume, length and overall impact of the restriction as well as other macro-economic factors. Valuations should be discounted appropriately until the securities may be freely traded.

If it has been determined that the exchange or OTC listed price does not accurately reflect fair market value, the Company may elect to treat the security as a private company and apply an alternative valuation method.

Investments in restricted securities of public companies may be included in Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. However, to the extent that significant inputs used to determine liquidity discounts are not observable, investments in restricted securities in public companies may be categorized in Level 3 of the fair value hierarchy.

The Company’s financial instruments primarily consist of cash and cash equivalents, accounts receivable, marketable securities, and accounts payable.

As of the balance sheet dates, the estimated fair values of the financial instruments were not materially different from their carrying values as presented on the balance sheet. This is primarily attributed to the short maturities of these instruments.

Effective July 1, 2008, the Company adopted ASC 820 (previously SFAS 157), Fair Value Measurements and adopted this Statement for the assets and liabilities shown in the table below. ASC 820 clarifies the definition of fair value, prescribes methods for measuring fair value, establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the inputs used to measure fair value, and expands disclosures about the use of fair value measurements. The adoption of ASC 820 did not have a material impact on our fair value measurements. ASC 820 permits the Company to defer the recognition and measurement of the nonfinancial assets and nonfinancial liabilities until January 1, 2010. At June 30, 2015, the Company did not have any nonfinancial assets or nonfinancial liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value. ASC 820 requires that financial assets and liabilities that are reported at fair value be categorized as one of the types of investments based upon the methodology mentioned in Level 1, Level 2 and Level 3 above for determining fair value.

Assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis are summarized below. The Company has no financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.

Available-for-sale securities

The Company uses various approaches to measure fair value of available-for-sale securities, while applying the three-level valuation hierarchy for disclosures, specified in ASC 820. Our Level 1 securities were measured using the quoted prices in active markets for identical assets and liabilities.

The company’s policy regarding the transfers in and/or out of Level 3 depends on the trading activity of the security, the volatility of the security, and other observable units which clearly represents the fair value of the security. If a level 3 security can be measured using a more fairly represented fair value, we will transfer these securities either into Level 1 or Level 2, depending on the type of inputs.

REVENUE RECOGNITION

The Company’s revenue recognition policies are in compliance with ASC 13 (previously Staff accounting bulletin (SAB) 104). The Company recognizes consulting and advisory fee revenues when the transaction is completed and the service fees are earned. Expenses are recognized in the period in which the corresponding liability is incurred. Payments received before all of the relevant criteria for revenue recognition are recorded as unearned revenue.

ADVERTISING

The Company expenses advertising costs as incurred. Advertising costs for the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014 were $4,350 and $5,195 respectively.

COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

ASC 220-10-45 (previously SFAS 130, Reporting Comprehensive Income) establishes standards for reporting and display of comprehensive income, its components and accumulated balances. Comprehensive income is defined to include all changes in equity, except those resulting from investments by owners and distributions to owners. Among other disclosures, SFAS No. 130 requires that all items that are required to be recognized under current accounting standards as components of comprehensive income be reported in a financial statement that is displayed with the same prominence as other financial statements. As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, respectively, accumulated other comprehensive income of $99,341 and accumulated other comprehensive loss of $709,183 are presented on the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.

INCOME TAXES

The Company accounts for income taxes in accordance with ASC 740 (previously SFAS No. 109, “Accounting for Income Taxes”). Deferred taxes are provided on the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences, and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

REPORTING OF SEGMENTS

ASC 280 (previously Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 131, Disclosures about Segments of an Enterprise and Related Information), which supersedes Statement of Financial Accounting Standards No. 14, Financial Reporting for Segments of a Business Enterprise, establishes standards for the way that public enterprises report information about operating segments in annual financial statements and requires reporting of selected information about operating segments in interim financial statements regarding products and services, geographic areas and major customers. ASC 280 defines operating segments as components of an enterprise about which separate financial information is available that is evaluated regularly by the chief operating decision maker in deciding how to allocate resources and in assessing performance. The Company operated in one segment that generated revenues during the years ended June 30, 2015 and 2014.

RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES

In the normal course of business, the Company is subject to certain risks and uncertainties. The Company provides its service and receives marketable securities upon execution of transactions. Consequently, the value of the securities received from customers can be affected by economic fluctuations and each customer’s business growth. The actual realized value of these securities could be significantly different than recorded value.

RECENT ACCOUNTING PRONOUNCEMENTS

The Company has either evaluated or is currently evaluating the implications, if any, of each of these pronouncements and the possible impact they may have on the Company’s financial statements. In most cases, management has determined that the pronouncement has either limited or no application to the Company and, in all cases, implementation would not have a material impact on the financial statements taken as a whole.

NOTE 3 – LOANS RECEIVABLE

Loans receivable consist of the following at June 30, 2015 and 2014:

NOTE 4 – OTHER ASSETS

The Other Assets comprise of the following as of June 30, 2015 and 2014:

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2011, Philand Vietnam Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Philand Ranch Ltd., made a security deposit in the amount of $172,203 to the Chu Lai Open Economic Zone Authority, Quang Nam Province, Vietnam as a guarantee for the Pointe91 development project at Bien Rang, Chu Lai, Nui Thanh District, Quang Nam Province, Vietnam. This amount was later transferred to Ky Ha Chu Lai Investment and Development LLC (“KHCLIDC”) as a deposit for the clearing of land and resettlement of residents in the Pointe91 project area. As a result of the discontinuance of the Pointe91 development project, the Company was supposed to receive the refund of the deposit amount, less any expenses incurred in connection with the land clearing and resettlement activity. Philand Vietnam Ltd. received repayments from KHCLIDC totaling approximately $99,160 as of June 30, 2014 and wrote off the balance of $73,043 as of June 30, 2015.

During the year ended June 30, 2011, the Company signed a consulting agreement to assist Agent155 Media Corp., a Delaware corporation, with respect to its corporate restructuring and business combination with Freshwater Technologies, Inc., a Nevada corporation. As part of the restructuring requirements, the Company made payment to Manning Elliot LLP in the amount of $24,476 on behalf of Freshwater Technologies, Inc. and other loan amounts to Agent155 Media Corp. As of June 30, 2014, the President of Agent155 Media Corp. assumed the balance of $66,955 from Agent155 Media Corp. as his personal obligations to the Company.

On January 10, 2013, the Company issued 3,288,443 shares of its restricted Common Stock for deposit towards the total purchase price of the 70% equity interest in PT Tambang Sekarsa Adadaya. We recorded the value of these shares at par for a total of $3,288. These shares were cancelled during the last quarter of the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015.

As of June 30, 2015, the total amounts owed by the President of Agent155 Media Corp., the deposit for acquisition and the investment in a subsidiary were collectively reported as Other Assets totaling $77,729.

NOTE 5 – MARKETABLE EQUITY SECURITIES AVAILABLE FOR SALE

The Company’s marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and, as such, are carried at fair value. All of the securities are comprised of shares of common stock of the investee. Securities classified as available-for-sale may be sold in response to changes in interest rates, liquidity needs, and for other purposes. Each investment in marketable securities represents less than twenty percent (20%) of the outstanding common stock and stock equivalents of the investee, and each security is nationally quoted on the National Association of Securities Dealers OTC Bulletin Board (“OTCBB”) or the Pink Sheets. As such, each investment is accounted for in accordance with the provisions of SFAS No. 115.

Marketable securities classified as available for sale as of June 30, 2015 consisted of 38,197,971 shares of Myson Group, Inc. (formerly Vanguard Mining Corporation), a public company traded on the OTC Markets (Trading symbol: MYSN) and 900 shares of Intel Corporation, (NASDAQ:INTC). The fair value of the marketable securities recorded as of June 30, 2015 was $350,556.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, a total of 3,833,360 shares of Myson Group, Inc. (formerly Vanguard Mining Corp.) were transferred from level 3 to level 2 due to reclassification from restricted to unrestricted status. Based on the cost basis of $0.025 and the price of $0.050 of these securities at the time of transfer, the net increase in the market value of these securities at the time of transfer was $95,834.

The change in unrealized appreciation (depreciation) related to the Level 2 investments still held at June 30, 2015 is $184,200. Level 2 securities sold during the year were sold at net realized loss of ($45,176).

NOTE 6 – PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT

As of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014 the Company did not have any property or equipment.

NOTE 7 – DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS

As of June 30, 2012, the Company decided to recognize the businesses of PHI Gold Corp. (formerly PHI Mining Corporation), Providential Vietnam Ltd., PHI Energy Corp., and Philand Ranch Ltd., a United Kingdom corporation, together with its wholly-owned subsidiaries Philand Corporation (USA), Philand Ranch Ltd. (Singapore) and Philand Vietnam Ltd. as discontinued operations for practical business and accounting purposes. As of June 30, 2013, the Company recorded a total of $2,234,327 for the liabilities and potential liability contingencies and wrote off all non-performing assets associated with these discontinued operations. As of June 30, 2015, the Company had a balance of $1,045,232 as Liabilities from Discontinued Operations.

NOTE 8 – ACCOUNTS PAYABLE AND ACCRUED EXPENSES

The accounts payable and accrued expenses at June 30, 2015 and 2014 consist of the following:

NOTE 9 – DUE TO OFFICER

Due to officer, represents advances made by officers of the Company and its subsidiaries, which are non-interest bearing, except for $100,000 as described below, unsecured and due on demand. As of June 30, 2015 and 2014, the balances were $1,879,458 and $1,858,402, respectively.

As of June 30, 2015, the Company has a short term note payable amounting $100,000 with interest bearing $3,000 per month payable to member of the Board of Directors.

NOTE 10 – LOANS AND PROMISSORY NOTES

SHORT TERM NOTES PAYABLE:

As of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, the Company had short-term notes payable amounting to $1,342,618 and $1,346,721 with accrued interest of $ and $3,188,890, respectively. These notes bear interest rates ranging from 6% to 36% per annum.

Some of the notes payable are secured by assets of the Company as summarized below:

CONVERTIBLE PROMISSORY NOTE. The last Convertible Promissory Note issued to Asher Enterprises, Inc. (“Asher”) on June 17, 2011 was $42,500, with interest of 8% per annum, due and payable March 21, 2012. This note is convertible at the election of Asher from time to time after the issuance date, at 39% discount to the average of the lowest closing bid prices for the Company’s common stock during the ten trading day period ending on the latest complete trading prior to the conversion date. In the event of default, the amount of principal and interest not paid when due bear interest at the rate of 22% per annum and the note becomes immediately due and payable. Should that occur, the Company is liable to pay Asher 150% of the then outstanding principal and interest. The note agreements contain covenants requiring Asher’s written consent for certain activities not in existence or not committed to by the Company on the issue date of the note. Outstanding note principal and interest amounts accrued thereon can be converted in whole, or in part, at any time by Asher after the issuance date into an equivalent of the Company’s common stock determined by the discount rate mentioned in the note.

Additionally, the note contains a reset provision to the exercise price and conversion price if the Company issues equity or other derivatives at a price less than the exercise price set forth in such warrants and note. This ratchet provision results in a derivative liability in our financial statements.

On July 25, 2011, $10,000 principal of the convertible note issued on January 11, 2011 was converted into an equivalent of 1,550 shares of post-split common stock of the Company (2,325,581 pre-split shares).

On August 8, 2011, $12,000 principal of the convertible note issued on January 11, 2011 was converted into an equivalent of 1,633 shares of post-split common stock of the Company (2,448,980 pre-split shares).

On August 30, 2011, $15,000 principal of the convertible note issued on January 11, 2011 was converted into an equivalent of 2,941 shares of post-split common stock of the Company (4,411,765 pre-split shares).

On October 21, 2011, $8,000 principal of the convertible note issued on January 11, 2011 was converted into an equivalent of 2,667 shares of post-split common stock of the Company (4,000,000 pre-split shares).

On November 22, 2011, $10,000 principal of the convertible note issued on January 11, 2011 was converted into an equivalent of 5,083 shares of post-split common stock of the Company (7,625,000 pre-split shares).

On January 03, 2012, $10,000 principal of the convertible note issued on June 17, 2011 was converted into an equivalent of 4,444 shares of post-split common stock of the Company (6,666,667 pre-split shares).

On January 11, 2012, $11,000 principal of the convertible note issued on June 17, 2011 was converted into an equivalent of 5,641 shares of post-split common stock of the Company (8,461,538 pre-split shares).

On March 1, 2012, $12,000 principal of the convertible note issued on June 17, 2011 was converted into an equivalent of 5,741 shares of post-split common stock of the Company (8,571,429 pre-split shares).

On April 23, 2012, Asher Enterprises, Inc. converted $7,000 principal amount of the convertible note dated June 17, 2011 into 8,197 shares of post-split common stock of the Company at the price of $0.854 per share.

During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, Asher Enterprises, Inc. converted a total of $4,700 in principal and accrued interest into 77,049 shares of Common Stock of the Company at the price of $0.061 per share. As of June 30, 2015, the last Convertible Promissory Note issued to Asher Enterprises, Inc. on June 17, 2011 has been paid in full.

DUE TO PREFERRED STOCKHOLDERS:

The Company classified $215,000 of preferred stock subscribed as a current liability payable to holders of preferred stock in a previously discontinued subsidiary of the Company due to deficiency in compliance of the preferred shares subscription agreement in connection with the referenced subsidiary in the year 2000. The Company has made an offer for these preferred stock holders to receive shares of common stock in the Company in exchange for the preferred shares but so far only a small number of the preferred shareholders have accepted the offer.

The interest expenses payable to holders of preferred stock of $387,455 and $361,655 have been included in accrued interest included in the accrued expenses on the balance sheets as of June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014, respectively.

ADVANCES FROM CUSTOMERS (PREVIOUSLY CLASSIFIED AS UNEARNED REVENUE)

As of September 30, 2012, the Company decided to reclassify the previously recorded Unearned Revenues as Advances from Customers because the Company has not been able to complete the consulting services for the related clients due to their inability to provide GAAP-compliant audited financial statements in order to file a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission. As of June 30, 2015, the Company recorded $563,219 as Advances from Customers.

NOTE 11 – LITIGATION

LEGAL PROCEEDING SETTLED AND UNPAID AS OF JUNE 30, 2015:

QUANG VAN CAO AND NHAN THI NGUYEN CAO VS. PROVIDENTIAL SECURITIES, INC. ET AL.

This case was originally submitted to Orange County Superior Court, CA on June 25, 1997, Case No. 781121, and subsequently moved to NASD Dispute resolution for arbitration. On or about August 24, 2000, the Company’s legal counsel negotiated with the Claimant’s counsel and unilaterally reached a settlement that had not been approved by the Company. While the Company was in the process of re-negotiating the terms of said settlement, the Claimants filed a request for arbitration hearing before the National Association of Securities Dealers on October 4, 2000, Case No. 99-03160. Thereafter, the Claimants filed a complaint with the Orange County Superior Court, CA on October 31, 2000, Case No. 00CC13067 for alleged breach of contract for damages in the sum of $75,000 plus pre-judgment interest, costs incurred in connection with the complaint, and other relief. Without admitting or denying any allegations, the Company reached a settlement agreement with the Claimants whereby the Company would pay the Claimants a total of $62,500 plus $4,500 in administrative costs. As the date of this report, the Company has paid $2,500 and is subject to an entry of judgment for $79,000. In May 2011, the Claimants filed an application for and renewal of judgment for a total of $140,490.78. As of June 30, 2015 the Company accrued $172,091 for potential liabilities in connection with this case in the accompanying consolidated financial statements.

WILLIAM DAVIDSON VS. DOAN ET AL.

On or about February 01, 2010, the company was notified of a suit that was filed with the Superior Court of the State of California for the County of Los Angeles on November 24, 2009 by William Davidson, an individual against Martin Doan, Henry Fahman, Benjamin Tran, HRCiti Corporation, and Providential Capital, Inc. (collectively referred to as “Defendants” - Case No. BC 426831). Plaintiff demanded an amount of not less than $140,000.00 from Defendants for promissory notes outstanding between Plaintiff and the company.

On July 09, 2012 William Davidson and PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. (formerly Providential Capital, Inc.), a subsidiary of the Company, reached a settlement agreement with respect to whereby PHI Capital agreed to pay William Davidson a total of $200,000 over a period of nineteen months beginning September 1, 2012. Since November 30, 2012, William Davidson has converted portions of the total amount into common stock of PHI Group, Inc. in lieu of cash payment. The Company has accrued the required liabilities associated with the balance of these notes in the accompanying consolidated financial statements as of June 30, 2015.

NOTE 12 – PAYROLL LIABILITIES

The payroll liabilities are accrued and recorded as accrued expenses in the consolidated balance sheet. During the quarter ended June 30, 2014, the Company paid $41,974.22 to the Internal Revenue Service and $ 19,289.94 to the State of California Employment Development Department towards the balance of $118,399 of payroll tax, penalties and interest claimed by these agencies. The Company is currently working with the Internal Revenue Service and the State of California Employment Department to resolve the remaining balance.

NOTE 13 – BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER SHARE

Net loss per share is calculated in accordance with SFAS No. 128, “Earnings per Share”. Under the provision of SFAS No. 128, basic net loss per share is computed by dividing the net loss for the period by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted EPS is based on the weighted-average number of shares of common stock outstanding for the period and common stock equivalents outstanding at the end of the period. Basic and diluted weighted average numbers of shares for the year ended June 30, 2015 were the same since the inclusion of Common stock equivalents is anti-dilutive.

NOTE 14 – STOCKHOLDER’S EQUITY

The total number of authorized capital stock of the Company is 400,000,000 shares with a par value of $0.001 per share, consisting of 300,000,000 shares of voting Common Stock with a par value of $0.001 per share and 100,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock with a par value of $0.001 per share. The rights and terms associated with the Preferred Stock will be determined by the Board of Directors of the Company.

On March 15, 2012, the Company effectuated a 1 for 1,500 reverse split of the Company’s Common Stock.

Treasury Stock:

The balance of treasury stock as of June 30, 2015 was 3,289 post-split shares valued at $3,801.

Common Stock:

On July 19, 2012, an officer of the Company converted a total of $307,000 debts owed by the Company into 1,196,424 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s restricted common stock.

On July 31, 2012, seven creditors of the Company converted a total of $177,333.33 debts owed by the Company into 504,865 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock.

On November 19, 2012, the Company reserved 5,673,327 shares of its common stock for a special dividend distribution.

On November 30, 2012, four creditors of the Company converted a total of $220,079.06 debts owed by the Company into 81,737 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock.

On January 10, 2013, the Company issued 3,288,443 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock registered in the name of the majority shareholder of PT Tambang Sekarsa Adadaya as a deposit towards the total purchase price of the 70% equity interest in PT Tambang Sekarsa Adadaya.

On February 14, 2013, two creditors of the Company converted a total of $150,000 debts owed by the Company into 155,885 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock.

On February 22, 2013, the Company issued 44,763 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock valued at $50,000 to an Indonesian attorney as payment for legal services in connection with the purchase of PT Tambang Sekarsa Adadaya.

On February 22, 2013, a creditor of the Company converted a total of $33,633 debts owed by the Company into 44,844 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock.

On April 11, 2013, a creditor of the Company converted $50,000 owed by the Company into 76,540 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock.

On April 26, 2013, three creditors of the Company converted a total of $180,000 of debts owed by the Company into 304,913 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock.

On May 10, 2013, the Company issued 100,887 shares of its restricted common stock for $40,000 cash under Rule 144 for working capital.

On July 1, 2013, three creditors of the Company converted a total of $177,940 of principal and interest owed by the Company into 412,569 shares of common stock of PHI Group, Inc.

On February 11, 2014, a creditor of the Company converted a total of $156,750 of debts owed by the Company into 337,097 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock.

On August 27, 2014, a creditor of the Company converted a total of $27,706.26 of short-term notes and accrued interest owed by the Company into 91,440 shares of PHI Group, Inc.’s common stock.

On January 22, 2015, the Company issued 77,049 shares of $0.001 par value Common Stock to Asher Enterprises, Inc. as payment in full for the balance of principal and accrued interest from the last Convertible Promissory Note issued to Asher Enterprises, Inc. on June 17, 2011.

On February 10, 2015, the Company issued 300,000 restricted shares of its $0.001 par value Common Stock to a shareholder-investor for cash.

On May 14, 2015, the Company cancelled 3,288,443 shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value Common Stock that were issued to the majority shareholder of PT Tambang Sekarsa Adadaya on January 10, 2013 as a deposit towards the total purchase price of the 70% equity interest in PT Tambang Sekarsa Adadaya. This transaction was terminated due to unsatisfactory due diligence results.

As of June 30, 2015, there were 9,584,675 post-split shares of the Company’s $0.001 par value Common Stock issued, including 5,673,327 shares reserved for a special dividend distribution, and 3,911,348 shares outstanding, respectively.

Preferred Stock: There is no preferred stock issued and outstanding.

Class A Preferred Stock: On April 2, 2015, the Company designated the first fifty million (50,000,000) shares of the Company’s previously authorized 100,000,000 shares of Preferred Stock, with a par value of $0.001 per share, as Class A Cumulative Convertible Redeemable Class A Preferred Stock (the “Class A Preferred Stock”) with the following rights and terms:

1) Dividends: Each holder of Class A Preferred Stock is entitled to receive twelve percent (12%) non-compounding cumulative dividends per annum, payable semi-annually.

2) Conversion: Each share of the Class A Preferred Stock shall be convertible into the Company’s Common Stock any time after one year from the date of issuance at a Variable Conversion Price (as defined herein) of the Common Stock. The “Variable Conversion Price” shall mean 75% multiplied by the Market Price (as defined herein) (representing a discount rate of 25%). “Market Price” means the average Trading Price for the Company’s Common Stock during the ten (10) trading-day period ending one trading day prior to the date the Conversion Notice is sent by the Holder of the Class A Preferred Stock to the Company via facsimile or email (the “Conversion Date”). “Trading Price” means, for any security as of any date, the closing price on the OTC Markets, OTCQB, NASDAQ Stock Markets, NYSE or applicable trading market as reported by a reliable reporting service (“Reporting Service”) mutually acceptable to the Company and Holder of the Class A Preferred Stock.

3) Redemption Rights: The Company, after a period of two years from the date of issuance, may at any time or from time to time redeem the Class A Preferred Stock, in whole or in part, at the option of the Company’s Board of Directors, at a price equal to one hundred twenty percent (120%) of the original purchase price of the Class A Preferred Stock or of a unit consisting of any shares of Class A Preferred Stock and any warrants attached thereto, plus, in each case, accumulated and unpaid dividends to the date fixed for redemption.

NOTE 15 – STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION PLAN

On February March 18, 2015, the Company adopted an Employee Benefit Plan to set aside 1,000,000 shares of common stock for eligible employees and independent contractors of the Company and its subsidiaries. As of June 30, 2015 the Company has not issued any stock in lieu of cash under this plan.

NOTE 16 – GAIN (LOSS) ON SETTLEMENT OF DEBTS

For the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015, the Company recorded a net loss in the amount of $25,845 on conversion of promissory notes by creditors as compared to a total gain of $372,278 on settlement of debts during the fiscal year ended June 30, 2014.

NOTE 17 – OTHER EXPENSE

Net Other Expense for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015 consists of the following:

NOTE 18 – RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

The Company accrued $210,000 in salaries for Henry Fahman (President of the Company) and Tina Phan (Secretary of the Company) during the years ended June 30, 2015 and June 30, 2014.

NOTE 19 – INCOME TAXES

No provision was made for income tax since the Company has significant net operating loss carry forward. Through June 30, 2015, the Company incurred net operating losses for tax purposes of approximately $37,679,736. The net operating loss carry forward may be used to reduce taxable income through the year 2031. Net operating loss for carry forwards for the State of California is generally available to reduce taxable income through the year 2021. The availability of the Company’s net operating loss carry-forward is subject to limitation if there is a 50% or more positive change in the ownership of the Company’s stock. (See Note 2).

“Under section 6501(a) of the Internal Revenue Code (Tax Code) and section 301.6501(a)-1(a) of the Income Tax Regulations (Tax Regulations), the IRS is required to assess tax within 3 years after the tax return was filed with the IRS. The Company’s 2015 tax return is open and may be subject to examination by the taxing authorities”.

NOTE 20 – CONTRACTS AND COMMITMENTS

BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH THINH HUNG INVESTMENT CO.

During the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010 the Company signed an agreement with Thinh Hung Investment Co., Ltd., a Vietnam-based company, to assist Thinh Hung in identifying, locating and, possibly, acquiring various business opportunities for Thinh An Co., Ltd., a subsidiary of Thinh Hung, including but not limited to a reverse merger, a stock swap, or a business combination between Thinh An and a publicly-traded company in the U.S. In exchange for the services rendered, the Company would receive compensation in cash from Thinh Hung and common stock of the combined company. As of September 30, 2011, the Company has completed a stock purchase and investment agreement between Thinh Anh Co., Ltd. and Vietnam Foods Corporation, a Nevada corporation. However, the combined company has not filed a registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission to become a reporting company. The Company has recognized $26,656 as only revenues from this transaction. The balance of $293,219 was booked as Customer Advances in the liability portion of the balance sheet.

AGREEMENT WITH COLEBRAND INTERNATIONAL LTD.

On January 28, 2013 the Company signed a Business Cooperation Agreement with Colebrand International Ltd., a company organized and existing under the laws of the United Kingdom, to cooperate in international trade and financial intermediation. The term of this agreement is two years and has been extended to December 10, 2015.

AGREEMENT WITH PACA

On February 25, 2013, PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., a subsidiary of the Company, signed a consulting/engagement agreement with PACA, a New York corporation, to contemplate raising capital for the purpose of financing PHI Group, Inc.’s business plan including acquisition of various energy properties and general working capital. The term of the engagement is two years and has been extended to February 24, 2016. PACA will be entitled to cash success fee and equity success fee for each successful financing transaction.

AGREEMENT WITH PACIFIC ENERGY NETWORK: On August 16, 2013 the Company signed a Business Cooperation Agreement with Pacific Energy Network, Inc., a Washington corporation, to cooperate with each other to develop and implement conventional and renewable energy business projects in geographical areas and under terms and conditions that are mutually acceptable to both parties. The term of this agreement is two years.

AGREEMENT WITH NE NORD ENERGY JOINT STOCK COMPANY

On November 14, 2013 the Company signed a Business Cooperation and Investment Agreement with NE Nord Energy Joint Stock Company, a Vietnamese company, to cooperate, co-develop, invest or cause to be invested in, produce, market and sell LED lighting, solar energy, kinetic power supply system, renewable energy, and other energy-related products and services in geographical areas and markets that deem economically beneficial to both parties. The term of this agreement is two years.

BUSINESS AND FINANCIAL CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH ASIA GREEN CORP.

On January 17, 2014 PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a Business and Financial Consulting Agreement with Asia Green LLC (“Asia Green VN”), a Vietnamese company engaged in afforestation and reforestation projects in Vietnam, to assist Asia Green in becoming a fully reporting publicly traded company in the United States and in arranging capital for Asia Green to execute its business plan. PHI Capital Holdings is entitled to receive six hundred twenty thousand U.S. dollars as compensation for the services rendered. The term of this agreement is one year or until Asia Green has become a fully reporting public company. On April 4, 2014 Touchlink Communications, Inc., a Nevada corporation, a majority-owned subsidiary of the Company, changed its name to Asia Green Corporation and entered into a Corporate Combination Agreement with Asia Green VN to become the holding company for Asia Green VN’s agroforestry and afforestation business. On July 28, 2014 Asia Green Corporation changed its name to Omni Resources, Inc to pursue a new business.

CONSULTING ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH VIETNAM MINING CORPORATION (n/k/a VANGUARD MINING CORPORATION)

On January 24, 2014 PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a Consulting Engagement Agreement with Vietnam Mining Corporation, k/n/a Vanguard Mining Corporation (“VNMC”), a Nevada corporation, to assist VNMC to regain its current and good standing status with the pertinent regulatory agencies in the United States and certain private service providers and to seek new business opportunities for VNMC. PHI Capital Holdings is entitled to receive four million pre-split shares of restricted common stock of VNMC pursuant to the provisions of Rule 144 as compensation for the services rendered. The term of this agreement is six months. During the quarter ended March 31, 2015, PHI Capital Holdings received sixteen million post-split shares of Common Stock of VNMC as compensation for the services rendered.

FUNDING AGREEMENT REGARDING PETROBRAS BONDS

On February 4, 2014 the Company signed a Funding Agreement with The Dieterich Group and Robert M. Terry to provide up to $300,000, more likely increasing to $400,000 in funding, on a best efforts and non-exclusive basis to underwrite the collection efforts being undertaken on a series of 500 bonds originally issued by Petrobras, a Brazilian corporation focused on oil and gas exploration and development. These bonds are currently owned and controlled by Starboard Financial, a Nevada LLC. In the most recent valuation report, each of these bonds had a published discounted value of $750,000 including 7% interest through February 2008 and a possible published redemption face value of $2,300,000. According to the Funding Agreement, the Company will receive a total recovery of 10 times its investment in funding and 12.5% of the net proceeds, assuming the entire funding is provided by the Company and/or its investors, from the bond collections after deduction of trading or selling expenses, and expenses of the Brazilian agents once Starboard Financial and Brazilian parties have received the first $20,000,000 recovered. As of the date of this report no proceeds have been collected from bonds.

ASSUMPTION OF DEBT BY AGENT155 MEDIA CORP’S OFFICER.

October 29, 2014, Christopher Martinez, President of Agent155 Media Corp. personally assumed the balance of $66,955 previously owed to the Company by Agent155 Media Corp. as his personal obligations retroactively December 31, 2011.

BUSINESS COOPERATION AND INVESTMENT AGREEMENT WITH AG MATERIALS, LLC.

On January 7, 2015, the Company signed a Business Cooperation and Investment Agreement with AG Materials, LLC, an Alabama limited liability company, (“AGM”) to primarily cooperate with each other to establish and operate a 200,000 MT wood pellet plant in Live Oak, Suwannee County, Florida. Both AGM and the Company intend to utilize the benefits of AGM’s previous arrangements with Klausner Lumber One, LLC, a wholly-owned subsidiary of Klausner Group, an Australian company, to purchase 400,000 to 800,000 short tons (ST) of feedstock per year from Klausner Lumber One, to purchase a fifteen-acre parcel of land to build the new wood pellet plant in Live Oak, Suwannee County, Florida. The Company will be responsible for providing the required capital for the purchase of land, machinery and equipment, and accessories, for construction and for working capital of the new wood pellet plant. AGM and the Company will enter into a definitive agreement which includes specific terms and conditions, obligations, benefits, representations, warranties, covenants, and indemnities customary for a transaction of this type. Both parties have incorporated Cornerstone Biomass Corporation, a Florida corporation, as the entity to manage the joint-venture wood pellet project in Live Oak, Florida. Moreover, AGM and the Company may from time to time cooperate with each other and jointly engage in other business activities that deem mutually acceptable and beneficial to both parties.

PURCHASE AND SALE AGREEMENT WITH PT MEGA KENCANA PERSADA

On March 16, 2015 the Company signed an Agreement of Purchase and Sale, to be effective as of April 1, 2015, with PT Mega Kencana Persada (“MKPI”), an Indonesian company, and its majority shareholders (the “Shareholders”) to acquire a seventy-five percent (75%) equity ownership of and the rights to explore and mine the limestone tenement of approximate 330 hectares with an IUP Exploration License No. 540/112/K/2012 dated January 27, 2012, in Desa Sipapaga, Kecamatan Panyabungan, Kabupaten Mandailing Natal, Sumatra Utara, Republic of Indonesia, in exchange for $950,000 in cash and $3,800,000 in the Company’s Class A Preferred Stock valued at $1.00 per share. As of the date of this report, both parties have yet to close the Purchase and Sale Agreement.

BUSINESS COOPERATION AND INVESTMENT AGREEMENT WITH CV BERKAT DO’A MAMA

On May 1, 2015, the Company signed a Business Cooperation and Investment Agreement (“BCIA”) with CV Berkat Do’A Mama, an Indonesian company, to: (1) develop and mine a 6,200-hectare coal concession with estimated deposits of 33-55 million MT in Kabupaten Kapuas, Central Kalimantan, (2) build a 30-MW coal-fired power plant in Kota Jayapura, Provinsi Papua, Indonesia, (3) potentially build a mine-mouth coal-fired power plant in Kabupaten Kapuas, Central Kalimantan, and (4) supply coals to the Indonesian domestic market and other countries, particularly Vietnam, Thailand, Malaysia, Japan, India and China. The BCIA calls for PHI Group, Inc. to sign a conditional Purchase and Sale Agreement within twenty one days after the signing of the BCIA to acquire a 70% equity ownership of CV Berkat Do’A Mama, to start a drilling program two weeks after the signing of the conditional Purchase and Sale Agreement, and to sign the definitive Purchase and Sale Agreement thirty days after the drilling and boring results are confirmed. After additional due diligence review, the Company decided not to further pursue this transaction and has continued vetting other coal concessions for acquisition under its long-term energy asset accumulation program.

CONSULTING ENGAGEMENT AGREEMENT WITH MYSON INVESTMENT AND IMPORT EXPORT JSC

On May 7, 2015, PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a Consulting Engagement Agreement with Myson Investment and Import Export Joint Stock Company (“Myson JSC”), a Vietnamese company, to provide consulting services to and assist Myson JSC to become a fully reporting public company in the U.S. Stock Market. As of June 30, 2015, PHI Capital Holdings received $50,000 in cash to defray the costs associated with the services rendered and 26,166,746 shares of common stock in Myson Group, Inc., a U.S. public company traded on the OTC Markets (Trading symbol: MYSN).

BUSINESS COOPERATION AGREEMENT AND MASTER CONTRACT FOR PURCHASE AND SALE OF SAND WITH KIEN HOANG MINERALS JOINT STOCK COMPANY

On May 8, 2015, the Company signed a Business Cooperation Agreement with Kien Hoang Minerals Joint Stock Company (” KHM JSC”), a Vietnamese company, to develop and expand international markets for KHM’s mineral products, particularly exports of reclamation sand and granite to Singapore through Primearth Resources Asia Pte Ltd, another strategic partner of the Company’s. The Company was granted the first right of refusal by KHM to purchase approximately 102 million cubic meters of sand and 40 million cubic meters of granite. On June 12, 2015, the Company signed a Master Contract for Purchase and Sale of 60 million cubic meters of sand recovered from the dredging and clearing of traffic pathways at De Gi estuary and surrounding areas in Binh Dinh Province, Vietnam over a period of five years for exports to Singapore and other Asian markets.

CONSULTING AGREEMENT WITH SPORTS POUCH BEVERAGE COMPANY

On June 3, 2015, PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a Consulting Engagement Agreement with Sports Pouch Beverage Company (“SPBV”), a Nevada corporation, to provide consulting services and assist SPBV with respect to business development, mergers and acquisitions, corporate governance, and corporate finance. PHI Capital Holdings, Inc. is entitled to receive up to forty percent of common stock in SPBV as compensation for the services rendered. The duration of this agreement is one year.

AGREEMENT WITH PRIMEFORTH RENEWABLE ENERGY LTD.

On June 24, 2015, PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a Consulting Engagement Agreement with Primeforth Renewable Energy Ltd. (“Primeforth”), a Singaporean company, to provide consulting services with respect to corporate development, corporate finance and debt financing for Primeforth Renewable Energy. PHI Capital Holdings is entitled to a one-time non-refundable professional fee of $20,000 and 4% cash success fee for any financing arranged for Primeforth. The term of this agreement is two years. Primeforth is engaged in developing alternative energy using patented microalgae technologies.

NOTE 21 – GOING CONCERN UNCERTAINTY

As shown in the accompanying consolidated financial statements, the Company has accumulated deficit of $37,679,736 as of June 30, 2015 and net loss from operations of $1,368,925 for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2015. These factors as well as the uncertain conditions that the Company faces in its day-to-day operations with respect to cash flows create an uncertainty as to the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern. Management has taken action to strengthen the Company’s working capital position and generate sufficient cash to meet its operating needs through June 30, 2016 and beyond. In the next twelve months, the Company intends to focus on implementing the reclamation sand business between Vietnam and Singapore and engaging in international trade involving energy products, industrial commodities and precious metals, while continuing to acquire energy-related and natural resource assets and carry out the business cooperation and investment agreements that have been signed with various international partners. PHI Capital Holdings, Inc., the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, will also continue to provide corporate and project finance services, including merger and acquisition advisory and consulting services and arranging funding for client companies in various industries. The Company anticipates generating substantial amounts of revenues through the reclamation sand business, international trade and M&A advisory and consulting activities as mentioned herein. No assurances could be made that management would be successful in achieving its plan. The president and chairman of the Company has committed to funding the Company’s operations from various sources for the next 12 months.

NOTE 22 – SUBSEQUENT EVENT

These financial statements were approved by management and available for issuance on September 25, 2015. Subsequent events have been evaluated through this date.

SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT WITH HAI P. NGUYEN

On July 16, 2015, the Company signed a Settlement and Payment Agreement with Hai P. Nguyen and agreed to pay the latter $25,000 in cash and 500,000 shares of Common Stock of Myson Group, Inc. as compensation for Hai P. Nguyen’s portion of contribution towards the budget to complete the services in connection with the Consulting Agreement dated January 24, 2014 between Vietnam Mining Corporation (now known as Myson Group, Inc.) and PHI Capital Holdings, Inc.

AGREEMENT FOR DEFRAYAL OF EXPENSES AND STOCK COMPENSATION WITH ASIA GREEN CORPORATION

On July 17, 2015, the Company signed an agreement to provide $75,000 to Asia Green Corporation (AGMC”), a Nevada corporation, for AGMC to pay certain required expenses and resume its status as fully reporting company with the Securities and Exchange Commission. In exchange for the fund, AGMC agrees to allocate 500,000 shares of its Common Stock upon the consummation of a business combination between itself and a Vietnamese company engaged in agriculture and reforestation.

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BUSINESS COOPERATION AND INVESTMENT AGREEMENT WITH RAT SOKHORN INCORPORATION CO., LTD.

On July 31, 2015, the Company signed a Master Agreement for Business Cooperation and Investment Agreement with Rat Sokhorn Incorporation Co., Ltd., a Cambodian company, to cooperate in the development and implementation of the following projects: (1) a 5,160-ha thermal coal concession in Sdach Kong Khang Lech and Kanthaor Khang Cheung areas, Banteay Meas and Kampong Trach Districts, Kampot Province, Cambodia; (2) a mine-mouth coal-fired power plant at the referenced coal concession; (3) a limestone concession in Sdach Kong Khang Lech and Kanthaor Khang Cheung areas, Banteay Meas and Kampong Trach Districts, Kampot Province, Cambodia for the cement and precipitated calcium carbonate; (4) a container seaport in Kampot Province; and (5) exploration and exploitation of precious and base metals in Cambodia. The Company will be responsible for arranging the required capital, technical expertise, engineering, procurement, construction (EPC), operations, and sales and marketing in connection with the proposed projects. The implementation of any one of these projects is subject to satisfactory due diligence and feasibility study by the Company. The Company’s management has conducted site visits with qualified technical professionals and consulted with Royal Haskoning DHV (www.royalhaskoningdhv.com) regarding these projects.

BUSINESS COOPERATION AND INVESTMENT AGREEMENT WITH CAVICO LAO MINING CO. LTD.

On August 7, 2015, the Company signed a Business Cooperation and Investment Agreement with Cavico Lao Mining Co., Ltd. (“CLM”) to provide the initial required capital to be raised from the Company’s 506(c) private placement for CLM’s interim operations and a budget to conduct an independent JORC report for the nickel portion of the CLM’s a 80-hectare multi-mineral mine in the Khoam Bang mountainous area at Ban Bo, Bulikhamsay, Laos People’s Democratic Republic. In addition, the Company shall establish a subsidiary to be the holding company for the CLM’s assets to be spun off as a separate publicly traded company (“PubCo”) on the NASDAQ Stock Markets, subject to certain conditions and requirements. CLM management believes the estimated value of the nickel portion in the afore-mentioned multi-mineral mine is approximately $1.5 billion - $4 billion, subject to further independent validation.

MASTER AGREEMENT FOR BUSINESS COOPERATION WITH DREDGE MASTERS AND CIVIL WORKS

On August 19, 2015, the Company signed an agreement with Dredge Masters and Civil Works, Inc., a Filipino corporation, to cooperate with each other in order to optimize the dredging, transshipment, loading, shipping and unloading of saline sand on large scales to serve the needs of land reclamation in Singaporean and other Asian countries. The term of this agreement is one year.

STOCK PURCHASE AND INVESTMENT AGREEMENT WITH VINABENNY ENERGY JOINT STOCK COMPANY

On September 1, 2015, the Company signed an agreement to acquire a 50.10% equity ownership in VinaBenny Energy Joint Stock Company (“VinaBenny”, a Vietnamese company, for $10,700,000 and to arrange capital for VinaBenny to complete a 84,000 MT Liquefied Petroleum Gas (LPG) terminal in Can Giuoc District, Long An Province, Vietnam. The final closing of this transaction is scheduled to occur by December 31, 2015.

AGREEMENT WITH REDICSACO JOINT STOCK COMPANY

On September 11, 2015, the Company signed a Principle Business and Investment Agreement with Redicsaco JSC, a Vietnamese company, to cooperate with each other with respect to the dredging, transshipment, loading, sale and export of saline reclamation sand from the Ham Luong River waterway, Ben Tre Province, Vietnam to Singapore, Brunei and other Asian markets. The initial authorized volume of sand from this location is 25 million cubic meters and the total reserve is more than 390 million cubic meters.

AGREEMENT WITH HATICO INVESTMENT DEVELOPMENT JOINT STOCK COMPANY

On September 11, 2015, the Company signed a Principle Business Cooperation Agreement with HATICO Investment Development Joint Stock Company, a Vietnamese company, to cooperate with each other in order to dredge, sell and export saline reclamation sand from Ha Tien, Kien Giang Province, Vietnam and to develop a deep-water seaport terminal at this location. It is estimated that the volume of sand from this location is approximately one billion cubic meters. Both parties have agreed in principle for the Company to acquire 50.90% of HATICO or own the same percentage in a joint venture company to be set up.

ITEM 9. CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None.

ITEM 9A. CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures

Disclosure controls and procedures are controls and other procedures that are designed to provide reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in reports filed or submitted under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and accumulated and communicated to management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Our management, at the direction of our chief executive officer/acting chief financial officer, performed an evaluation of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures (as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and Rule 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act). Based on that evaluation and the identification of material weaknesses in our internal control over financial reporting as described in this Item 9A below under the heading Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting, our management concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective as of June 30, 2015.

Notwithstanding these material weaknesses, management has concluded that the consolidated financial statements included in this report present fairly, in all material respects, PHI Group’s financial position and results of operations, and cash flows for the periods presented in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles (“GAAP”).

Management’s Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting at PHI Group. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed by or under the supervision of our chief executive officer/acting chief financial officer and effected by our board of directors, management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of our financial statements for external reporting purposes in accordance with GAAP. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that accurately and fairly reflect, in reasonable detail, transactions and dispositions of our assets, (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with GAAP and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management and board of directors, and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of our assets that could have a material effect on our financial statements.

Our management assessed the effectiveness of PHI Group’s internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015. In making this assessment, our management used the criteria established in the Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”).

In connection with the evaluation of our disclosure controls and procedures, our management team attempted to identify any “material weakness” in our internal control environment. We defined “material weakness” as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of our annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis. We defined “significant deficiency” as a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of our financial reporting.

We identified on a preliminary basis the following material weaknesses in internal control over financial reporting:

Our independent registered public accounting firm, Dave Banerjee, CPA, has not issued a report on our internal control over financial reporting as of June 30, 2015.

ITEM 9B. OTHER MATTERS

None.