Phoenix Life Sciences International Limited. - Annual Report: 2015 (Form 10-K)

Forward Looking Statements.  

This annual report contains forward-looking statements. These statements relate to future events or our future financial performance. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terminology such as “may”, “should”, “expects”, “plans”, “anticipates”, “believes”, “estimates”, “predicts”, “potential” or “continue” or the negative of these terms or other comparable terminology. These statements are only predictions and involve known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors, including the risks in the section entitled “Risk Factors”, that may cause our or our industry’s actual results, levels of activity, performance or achievements to be materially different from any future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements expressed or implied by these forward-looking statements.

Although we believe that the expectations reflected in the forward-looking statements are reasonable, we cannot guarantee future results, levels of activity, performance or achievements. Except as required by applicable law, including the securities laws of the United States, we do not intend to update any of the forward-looking statements to conform these statements to actual results.

Our financial statements are stated in United States Dollars ($) and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

In this annual report, unless otherwise specified, all dollar amounts are expressed in United States Dollars and all references to “common shares” refer to the common shares in our capital stock.

Except as otherwise indicated by the context, references in this report to “we”, “us” “our” and “the Company” are references to MediJane Holdings, Inc.

General Overview

The Company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 21, 2009, under the name Mokita Exploration, Ltd.    The Company originally intended to develop its business as a mineral exploration company, however, due to the low supply of potentially profitable mining properties, our company abandoned its original plan and restructured its business strategy.  We then focused our efforts on developing a business as a provider of credit card payment services for Canadian customers.  To reflect the Company’s new focus, on February 5, 2010, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation changing our name to Mokita, Inc.  

We decided to enter the oil and gas industry because we were seeking out viable options to create value for our shareholders.  On July 20, 2011, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation changing our name to Mokita Ventures, Inc., to reflect our company’s new business plan.  The name change to Mokita Ventures, Inc. was subsequently rejected by the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority (“FINRA”) and accordingly, on May 30, 2013, we filed a Certificate of Amendment to the Articles of Incorporation to restore our name to Mokita, Inc.

4

On February 27, 2014, there was a change of control of the Company.  On February 28, 2014, our board of directors and a majority of holders of the Company’s voting securities approved a change of name of the Company to MediJane Holdings Inc.  A Certificate of Amendment to effect the change of name was filed and became effective with the Nevada Secretary of State on March 4, 2014.  A Certificate of Correction was subsequently filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on March 6, 2014 to correct a spelling error in the Company’s new name.  These amendments have been reviewed by FINRA and were approved for filing with an effective date of March 10, 2014.  The name change became effective with the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board at the opening of trading on March 10, 2014 under our new ticker symbol "MJMD".

Our Business

After the change of control on February 27, 2014, the Company became a medical delivery systems company with a pharmaceutical approach to cannabinoid treatment of various illnesses with medical marijuana, currently being launched in Colorado and California.  As of July 8, 2015, we have changed our business to only focus on Cannabidiol (CBD) products.  CBD is a non-psychotropic cannabinoid that is not restricted as part of the U.S. Controlled Substance Act (CSA).  CBD is defined under the 2014 U.S. Farming Bill to be derivatives of the Industrial Hemp plant that contain less than 0.3% tetra-hydro-cannabinol (THC).  We will contract out the manufacturing of the products. Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation and other groups may manufacture our products under our license agreement.

License Agreement.  On July 8, 2015, the Company agreed to enter into a new licensing agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation. This new agreement shall replace the previous licensing agreements. The new licensing agreement shall be a non-exclusive, CBD only licensing agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation.  This license agreement operates for a twenty (20) year period.  Phoenix Bio Pharm has granted to the Company a license for the territory of North America, Australia and New Zealand to exploit all presently owned and after-acquired intellectual property rights and know-how of Phoenix Bio Pharm related to CBD based cannabinoid products and delivery systems for the treatment and management of illnesses.  Products falling under the license will include the following CBD products: transdermal patches, orally administered extracts, concentrated extracts for vaporizers and inhalers, sublingual and buccal dispensing products and extraction technology, suppository delivery systems, salves, creams, gels, lotions, and liquid extracts, and any products or active ingredients sourced through Phoenix Bio Pharm affiliates or third party suppliers or licensors.  The Company will also have the right to sublicense the rights acquired pursuant to the license agreement and to use and develop copyrighted materials of Phoenix Bio Pharm for marketing and distribution purposes.  

In addition to the new license agreement, on July 8, 2015 the Company has entered into an exchange agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharm where all existing common shares held by Phoenix Bio Pharm (276,000,000) are exchanged for 2,000,000 Series B Preferred Shares, par value $0.0001.  These preferred shares are entitled to 100 votes for each share held, and are convertible into 100 common shares at any time at the discretion of the holder.  

Products

The Company is currently working with physicians, scientists, engineers and other professional in the United States and internationally to formulate a wide range of product delivery systems to assure our products are a precise and safe alternative as a potential treatment for chronic illness.  These statements have not been evaluated by the Food and Drug Administration.  These products are not intended to diagnose, treat, cure or prevent disease.

5

During the year ended February 28, 2015, the Company had launched the following products for medicinal use in the State of California:

MediJane Transdermal Patches. Developed out of the commitment for accurate dosing and the application of pharmaceutical grade delivery methods within the cannabis industry.  Six (6) formulations of patches are in development with ongoing research for many more to come.  The patches retail for approximately $8-$12.50 per patch.

Medi-Strip Relaxation: Medi-Strips are a thin-film strip designed for relaxation and relief of pain and inflammation.  The strips retail for approximately $7.50 per patch.

Following the changes to the licensing agreement, the Company has agreed to sell the subsidiary companies that had previously sold the aforementioned products to Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

Further, with the change of products to focus only on those containing CBD, the Company seeks to distribute its products nationally it plans to distribute and sell future products, including but not limited to:

Transdermal Patches

Thin Film Tongue Strips

Capsules

Oral Sprays

Suppositories

CannaVest Corp.

On December 23, 2014, the Company entered into an agreement to purchase $1,200,000 worth of raw material inventory to be obtained from CannaVest Corp. to use in the Company’s cannabidiol product formulations, and a convertible promissory note for $1,200,000 with CannaVest Corp.  The note accrues simple interest at a rate of 10% per annum and is due and payable in six months from the date of issue.  The note cannot be prepaid.  At any time, the outstanding principal amount of this note and all accrued but unpaid interest under this note can be converted into common shares at a price equal to the lesser of $0.02 per common share, the closing sale price, or the average of the lowest closing sale prices of the Company’s common shares during the five trading day period immediately preceding the date of such determination.  Should the Company default on this convertible promissory note, all outstanding obligations payable by the Company are immediately due and payable.  In addition, CannaVest Corp. may exercise any other right, power or remedy permitted by law.  Further, upon even of default, all unpaid obligations under this note shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum.

6

In connection with the convertible promissory note dated December 23, 2014, the Company subsequently issued warrants to purchase 20,000,000 common shares at an exercise price of $0.02 per common share to Kisha Spendthrift Trust, an affiliate of CannaVest Corp.  These warrants were issued on January 6, 2015.  In exchange for these warrants, the Company shall have access to the technical and management staff of CannaVest Corp. for the development of products to be manufactured from cannabidiol sourced from CannaVest Corp.  The Company has valued these warrants using the black scholes option pricing model at $197,663 and will record the expense related to the warrants in its fourth fiscal quarter.

On July 8, 2015, the Company authorized an exchange offer to CannaVest in which the Company offers to exchange its convertible promissory note in the original principal amount of $1,200,000 for 1,200,000 Series D preferred shares.  These shares are not entitled to any votive rights, and can be converted into common shares at a rate of $1.00 per common share.  Series D preferred shares are senior to common shares and Series B preferred shares, and holders of Series D preferred shares are entitled to receive a preferred return equal to 10% of the gross cash sales income received in the ordinary course of business.  Upon issue of the dividend, the value of such Series D preferred shares shall be deemed to be retired.  As of the date of filing, CannaVest has not yet agreed to this exchange offer.

Strategic Alliances  

Phoenix Bio Pharm is a biopharmaceutical company focused on the acquisition, development and manufacturing of key intellectual property relating to cannabinoid treatment methodologies and of medical delivery systems for the treatment and management of a wide variety of illness and conditions.

Sales and Marketing

The Company is currently developing a new sales and marketing plan for the launch of its CBD only product lines. This plan is expected to include the use of in-house and in-field sales representatives as well as an online sales strategy.

Industry Analysis

The health, wellness and cannabinoid industries in the United States have been growing due to a substantial growth in the numbers of states approving the use of medical and adult-use marijuana and cannabinoid products. Additionally, in recent years, several internationally recognized medical journals and medical professionals including CNN’s chief medical correspondent, Dr. Sanjay Gupta, have published results relating to the use of cannabinoids in the treatment of cancer, childhood seizures, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s disease, Multiple Sclerosis and pain management. This swell of interest in alternative health and wellness related to the use of cannabinoids is resulting in the establishment of new opportunities across many industries.  Individual states have passed legislation for the regulation of medical and recreational use, but the lack of federal mandates has created some uncertainty in the industry.

Competitive Analysis

The health, wellness and cannabinoid industries, specifically in states that have passed medicinal marijuana laws, are rapidly evolving and intensely competitive, and we expect that the competition will intensify in the future.  Barriers to entry are minimal. We believe while we currently may have advantages in this market, the growth of this market is able to allow us to take a market share if we can raise sufficient funds to commence full-scale operations.  We will compete on the basis of quality and value, whilst leveraging established brands and operators, and

7

through customer preference.  Our competitors may be well established, substantially larger and have substantially greater market recognition, greater resources and broader capabilities than we have.  There can be no assurance that we will be able to compete successfully against current and future competitors, and competitive pressures faced by the Company may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations

Website/Social Community

Our web site, www.medijane.co currently fills a public and media relations role. Members of the press, present and prospective investors, and other interested parties, can access the latest news and download professionally prepared press releases and high resolution photos; visitors can learn more about the Company and investors and the public can scroll through our photo galleries to stay abreast of the latest on-site happenings.

Reports to Security Holders

We are required to file annual, quarterly and current reports and other information with the Securities and Exchange Commission and our filings are available to the public over the internet at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s website at http://www.sec.gov. The public may read and copy any materials filed by us with the Securities and Exchange Commission at the Securities and Exchange Commission’s Public Reference Room at 100 F Street N.E. Washington D.C. 20549. The public may obtain information on the operation of the Public Reference Room by calling the Securities and Exchange Commission at 1-800-732-0330. The SEC also maintains an Internet site that contains reports, proxy and formation statements, and other information regarding issuers that file electronically with the SEC, at http://www.sec.gov.

Revenue

The Company will receive revenue from the sales of its licensed products.

Government Regulations

As of July 8, 2015, the Company has shifted its business plan from medical marijuana preparations to solely focus on the sale of cannabinoid infused products that contain primarily Cannabidiol, which is a non-psychotropic cannabinoid that is not restricted as part of the U.S. Controlled Substance Act.  CBD is not restricted from sale in any state and is able to be sold through interstate commerce.

Employees

We have three (3) part-time employees in addition to Lewis “Spike” Humer, our interim Chief Executive Officer and Russell Stone, our Chief Operating Officer.

Item 1A.   Risk Factors

Not applicable to a smaller reporting company.

Item 1B.  Unresolved Staff Comments

Not applicable

8

Item 2.   Properties

Our headquarters are located at 2011 Ken Pratt Boulevard, Suite 300, Longmont, CO 80501.  Our telephone number is (720) 442-7242.  This space consists of 1,200 square feet and is subleased through an affiliate at a monthly rental rate of $2,500.  We believe that this location will meet our requirements for the foreseeable future.

Item 3.   Legal Proceedings

We know of no material, existing or pending legal proceedings against the Company, nor are we involved as a plaintiff in any material proceeding or pending litigation. There are no proceedings in which any of our directors, officers or affiliates, or any registered or beneficial stockholder, is an adverse party or has a material interest adverse to our interest.

Item 4.   Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

9

Our common stock is currently quoted on the OTC Pink Sheets. Our common stock has been quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board from December 28, 2010 to March 6, 2014 under the symbol “MKIT”.  On March 7, 2014, the symbol was changed to “MJMD”.  

The following table reflects the high and low bid information for our common stock and reflects inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, markdown or commission, and may not necessarily represent actual transactions.

The high and low bid prices of our common stock for the periods indicated below are as follows:

*The stock prices have been adjusted to retroactively reflect the 10 for 1 forward split effective August 7, 2013.

As of July 28, 2015, there were approximately 2,300 holders of record of our common stock. As of such date, 423,927,259 common shares were issued and outstanding.  

The transfer agent for our common shares is ClearTrust LLC, located at 16540 Pointe Village Drive, Suite 206, Lutz, Florida 33558.  Their phone number is (813) 235-4490.

On July 8, 2015, the Company approved the creation of four classes of preferred stock.  

-

Series A preferred stock, par value $0.0001 par value, shall have 2,000,000 authorized shares.   These preferred shares are not entitled to any voting rights, and are convertible into common shares at a rate of $1.00 per common share at any time at the discretion of the holder. Series A preferred shares rank senior to the common shares and the Series B preferred shares with respect to the right to receive dividends.

10

-

Series B preferred stock, par value $0.0001 par value, shall have 2,000,000 authorized shares.  These preferred shares are entitled to 100 vote for each share held, and are convertible into 100 common shares at any time at the discretion of the holder.  Series B preferred shares are senior to common shares.

-

Series C preferred stock, par value $0.0001 par value, shall have 2,000,000 authorized shares.  These preferred shares are not entitled to any voting rights, and are convertible into common shares at a rate of $1.00 per common share at any time at the discretion of the holder.  Series C preferred shares are entitled to receive a preferred return equal to 10% of the gross cash sales income received in the ordinary course of business.  Upon issue of the dividend, the value of such shares shall be deemed to be retired.  Series C preferred shares rank senior to the common shares and the Series B preferred shares with respect to the right to receive dividends.

-

Series D preferred stock, par value $0.0001 par value, shall have 2,000,000 authorized shares.  These preferred shares are not entitled to any voting rights, and can be converted into common shares at a rate of $1.00 per common share.  Series D preferred shares are senior to common shares and Series B preferred shares, and holders of Series D preferred shares are entitled to receive a preferred return equal to 10% of the gross cash sales income received in the ordinary course of business.  Upon issue of the dividend, the value of such Series D preferred shares shall be deemed to be retired.

Dividend Policy

We have not paid any cash dividends on our common stock since inception and presently anticipate that all earnings, if any, will be retained for development of our business and that no dividends on our common stock will be declared in the foreseeable future. Any future dividends will be subject to the discretion of our Board of Directors and will depend upon, among other things, future earnings, operating and financial condition, capital requirements, general business conditions and other pertinent facts. Therefore, there can be no assurance that any dividends on our common stock will be paid in the future.

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

Other than as disclosed below, we did not sell any equity securities which were not registered under the Securities Act during the year ended February 28, 2015 that were not otherwise disclosed on our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q or our current reports on Form 8-K filed during the year ended February 28, 2015.

On June 11, 2014, the Company sold 100,000 restricted common shares to accredited investors for consideration for proceeds of $75,000.  These common shares were issued in reliance upon the exemption provided by Section 4(a)(2) of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.

On September 16, 2014, we issued 6,666,667 common shares and 13,333,333 warrants to purchase common shares to YP Holdings, LLC pursuant to a securities purchase agreement.  YP Holdings, LLC paid $600,000 for these common shares and warrants.  These securities were issued under the Rule 4(a)(2) private placement exemption.  The purchaser had enough knowledge and experience to be considered a sophisticated investor, they have access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus for a registered securities offering, and they have agreed not to resell or distribute the securities to the public until they have been registered.  

11

On September 16, 2014, the Company issued David Pitt 453,333 warrants to purchase common shares.  Additionally, the Company issued Moody Capital LLC 80,000 warrants to purchase common shares.  Moody Capital LLC is owned by Tim Moody, a non-affiliate of the Company.  The warrants were issued in lieu of services valued at $104,578.  These securities were issued under the Rule 4(a)(2) private placement exemption.  The purchasers had enough knowledge and experience to be considered a sophisticated investor, they have access to the type of information normally provided in a prospectus for a registered securities offering, and they have agreed not to resell or distribute the securities to the public until they have been registered.

On July 8, 2015 the Company authorized an exchange agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharm where all existing common shares held by Phoenix Bio Pharm (276,000,000) are exchanged for 2,000,000 Series B Preferred Shares, par value $0.0001.  These preferred shares are entitled to 100 votes for each share held, and are convertible into 100 common shares at any time at the discretion of the holder.  

On July 8, 2015, the Company authorized an exchange letter to YP Holdings in which we would exchange the 6,666,667 common shares for 750,000 Series C preferred shares.  Series C preferred shares are not entitled to any voting rights, and are convertible into common shares at a rate of $1.00 per common share at any time at the discretion of the holder.  Series C preferred shares are entitled to receive a preferred return equal to 10% of the gross cash sales income received in the ordinary course of business.  Upon issue of the dividend, the value of such shares shall be deemed to be retired.  Series C preferred shares rank senior to the common shares and the Series B preferred shares with respect to the right to receive dividends.  As of the date of this filing, YP Holdings has not yet agreed to this offer.

On July 8, 2015, the Company authorized an exchange offer to CannaVest in which the Company offers to exchange its convertible promissory note in the original principal amount of $1,200,000 for 1,200,000 Series D preferred shares.  These shares are not entitled to any voting rights, and can be converted into common shares at a rate of $1.00 per common share.  Series D preferred shares are senior to common shares and Series B preferred shares, and holders of Series D preferred shares are entitled to receive a preferred return equal to 10% of the gross cash sales income received in the ordinary course of business.  Upon issue of the dividend, the value of such Series D preferred shares shall be deemed to be retired.  As of the date of filing, CannaVest has not yet agreed to this exchange offer.

Between January 15, 2015 and May 1, 2015, the Company issued 72,620,292 shares of common stock to Typenex under a Convertible Notes Agreement.  

Equity Compensation Plan Information

On June 9, 2014, the board of directors approved the Company’s 2014 Stock Awards Plan.  Up to 10,000,000 common shares may be issued under the Plan.  On June 9, 2014, the board of directors approved the issuance of options to purchase 5,000,000 common shares to Ron Lusk, an officer and director at the option exercise price of $0.34 per common share with an effective date of February 27, 2013, the date the board of directors authorized the issuance of 5,000,000 common shares to Mr. Lusk.  Said common share issuance was subsequently unwound and the common shares are in the process of being cancelled.  On September 17, 2014, Mr. Lusk resigned from his position of CEO.  Pursuant to Mr. Lusk’s stock option agreement, the vested options issued and outstanding as of date of termination will be exercisable for one-year.  As of February 28, 2015, there were 2,500,000 vested options available for exercise.

12

Purchase of Equity Securities by the Issuer and Affiliated Purchasers

We did not purchase any of our shares of common stock or other securities during our fourth quarter of our fiscal year ended February 28, 2015.

Item 6.   Selected Financial Data

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

Item 7.   Management's Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our audited financial statements and the related notes for the years ended February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014 that appear elsewhere in this annual report. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that reflect our plans, estimates and beliefs. Our actual results could differ materially from those discussed in the forward-looking statements. Factors that could cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to those discussed below and elsewhere in this annual report, particularly in the section entitled "Risk Factors".

Our audited financial statements are stated in United States Dollars and are prepared in accordance with United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.

On March 1, 2014, the Company discontinued its previous operations as an oil and gas enterprise to pursue its new operations as a medical marijuana sales and distribution company.  The results of operations for the year ended February 28, 2015 represent results of the new business.  The results of operations for the comparable period have been recorded as discontinued operations.

Revenues for the year ended February 28, 2015 was $23,549.  Cost of Sales for the year ended February 28, 2015 was $13,965.  Revenues and related expenses are primarily from the sale of cannabis products.

Amortization expense for the year ended February 28, 2015 was $1,350,533.  Amortization expense represents amortization expense related to the Company’s licensing and distribution agreements.

Product development expense for the year ended February 28, 2015 was $84,490.  Product development expenses primarily represent payments to Phoenix Bio Pharm ($15,000) and to Phoenix Pharms Capital ($64,000) to support the product development of branded products of the Company.

Sales and marketing expenses for the year ended February 28, 2015 were $240,406.  Sales and marketing expenses represent the early 2014 ramp up of the selling team, infrastructure and promotion of the Company.

Operations expenses for the year ended February 28, 2015 were $167,760.

13

General and administrative expenses for the year ended February 28, 2015 were $311,339. General and administrative expenses generally include costs for running the Company’s administrative office.  

Professional fees for the year ended February 28, 2015 were $678,168.  Professional fees consist of cost of financing, legal, accounting, consulting and advisory services.  Included in professional fees are $552,500 of non-cash expenses related to the issuance of warrants for financing services related to the YP Note.

Lease operating expenses for the year ended February 28, 2015 totaled $34,185, respectively.

Other income and expense for the year ended February 28, 2015 totaled net expenses of $7,817,649 including a one-time expense of $8,500,000 from the impairment to the Company’s license agreements with Phoenix Bio Pharm, and $518,976 representing amortization expenses related to the Company’s convertible promissory notes dated June 24, 2014.  Included other expenses year ended February 28, 2015 is a gain of $722 from discontinued operations.

Net loss for the year ended February 28, 2015, totaled $11,974,946.

Net gain from discontinued operations for the year ended February 28, 2015 was $722.  Net losses from discontinued operations for the year ended February 28, 2014 was $54,547.

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon the commencement of the sale of our products and obtaining financing to increase the production and development of our products.  For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report on our audited financial statements that they have substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern without further financing.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

At February 28, 2015, the Company had a cash balance of $9,400 compared with $6,104 at February 28, 2014.  The increase in cash was cash provided by financing activities during the year ended February 28, 2015 of $1,410,925, partially offset by cash used for operating expenses.

We believe that our cash on hand may not be sufficient for continued operations and may have to seek out additional funding to meet our inventory and operational needs.  We are currently seeking financing opportunities in the form of equity and/or debt financing to support our operational goals.

At February 28, 2014, the Company had a cash balance of $6,104 compared with $1,704 at February 28, 2013.  The increase in cash was attributed to an increase in convertible debt proceeds, partially offset by expenses discussed above.  The total asset balance as at February 28, 20144 was $6,104 compared to $41,918 at February 28, 2013.  The decrease in total assets was attributed to the other receivable related to the sale of the Company’s 1% working interest in the Premier property during fiscal year 2013.

Cash flow from Operating Activities.  During the year ended February 28, 2015, Company used $1,149,809 for operating activities.

14

Cash flow from Investing Activities.  During the year ended February 28, 2015, the Company incurred $258,122 from investing activities, representing its related party loan to Phoenix Pharms Capital.

Cash flow from Financing Activities.  During the year ended February 28, 2015, the Company received a net amount of $975,925 from financing activities related to sales of its common stock, and $385,000 of proceeds from notes payable and $50,000 from related notes payable.

Going Concern

We have not attained profitable operations and are dependent upon the commencement of the sale of our products and obtaining financing to increase the production and development of our products.  For these reasons, our auditors stated in their report on our audited financial statements that they have substantial doubt that we will be able to continue as a going concern without further financing.

Future Financings

We will continue to rely on equity sales of our common shares in order to continue to fund our business operations.  Issuances of additional shares will result in dilution to existing stockholders. There is no assurance that we will achieve any additional sales of the equity securities or arrange for debt or other financing to fund planned acquisitions and exploration activities.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We have no significant off-balance sheet arrangements that have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on our financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues or expenses, results of operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that are material to stockholders.

Critical Accounting Policies

Our financial statements and accompanying notes have been prepared in accordance with United States generally accepted accounting principles applied on a consistent basis. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting periods.

We regularly evaluate the accounting policies and estimates that we use to prepare our financial statements. A complete summary of these policies is included in the notes to our financial statements. In general, management's estimates are based on historical experience, on information from third party professionals, and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the facts and circumstances. Actual results could differ from those estimates made by management.

Use of Estimates. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the deferred income tax asset valuation allowances.  The Company bases its estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the

15

circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

A significant item that requires management's estimates and assumptions is the estimate of proved oil reserves which are used in the calculation of depletion, impairment of its properties and asset retirement obligations.  Other items subject to estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, valuation allowances for income taxes, valuation of derivatives instruments and accrued liabilities, among others. Although management believes these estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Stock-based Compensation.   The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Based Compensation and ASC 505-50 - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

Revenue Recognition.   The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and delivery has occurred, provided the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is probable. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed and determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction. If a fee is based upon a variable such as acceptance by the customer, the Company accounts for the fee as not being fixed and determinable. In these cases, the Company defers revenue and recognizes it when it becomes due and payable. Up-front engagement fees are recorded as deferred revenue and amortized to income on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement, although the fee is due and payable at the time the agreement is signed or upon annual renewal. Payments related to substantive, performance-based milestones in an agreement are recognized as revenue upon the achievement of the milestones as specified in the underlying agreement when they represent the culmination of the earnings process.

The Company assesses the probability of collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the current financial condition of the customer. If the Company determines that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, revenue is deferred until the time collection becomes reasonably assured. Significant management judgment and estimates must be made and used in connection with the revenue recognized in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period if our management made different judgments or utilized different estimates.

From inception to February 28, 2015, revenues associated with the sale of oil is accounted for using the sales method, whereby revenue is recognized by the operator of the mineral properties for oil sold to purchasers with the Company recognizing the portion of its share of the revenues.

16

Recent Accounting Pronouncements  

The recent accounting pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations.

Contractual Obligations

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide tabular disclosure obligations.

Item 7A.  Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk

As a “smaller reporting company”, we are not required to provide the information required by this Item.

17

MEDIJANE HOLDINGS, INC.

(A Development Stage Company)

Financial Statements

For the Year Ended February 28, 2015

18

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

The Board of Directors and Stockholders

MediJane Holdings Inc.

We have audited the accompanying balance sheet of MediJane Holdings Inc. as of February 28, 2015 and 2014, and the related statement of operations, stockholders’ deficiency, and cash flows for the years then ended.  These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management.  Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audit.  

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).  Those standards require that we plan and perform the audits to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement.  The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting.  Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.  Accordingly, we express no such opinion.  An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation.  We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of MediJane Holdings Inc. as of February 28, 2015 and 2014, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As shown in the accompanying financial statements, the Company has significant net losses and cash flow deficiencies.  Those conditions raise substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans regarding those matters are described in Note 1.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result from the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/ DKM Certified Public Accountants

DKM Certified Public Accountants

Clearwater, Florida

July 13, 2015

19

MEDIJANE HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Balance Sheets

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

20

MEDIJANE HOLDINGS, Inc.

Consolidated Statements of Operations

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

21

MEDIJANE HOLDINGS, INC,.

Consolidated Statements of Changes in Stockholders’ Deficiency

(The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

22

MEDIJANE HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Unaudited)

 (The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements)

23

MEDIJANE HOLDINGS, INC.

Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows

(Continued from previous page)

24

MEDIJANE HOLDINGS, INC.

Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements

1.

Nature of Operations and Continuance of Business

The company was incorporated in the State of Nevada on April 21, 2009 under the name Mokita Exploration, Ltd. (the “Company”).  On February 27, 2014, there was a change of control of the Company.  On February 28, 2014, our board of directors and a majority of holders of the Company’s voting securities approved a change of name of the Company to MediJane Holdings Inc.  A Certificate of Amendment to effect the change of name was filed and became effective with the Nevada Secretary of State on March 4, 2014.  A Certificate of Correction was subsequently filed with the Nevada Secretary of State on March 6, 2014 to correct a spelling error in the Company’s new name.  These amendments have been reviewed by FINRA and were approved for filing with an effective date of March 12, 2014.  The name change became effective with the Over-the-Counter Bulletin Board at the opening of trading on March 12, 2014 under our new ticker symbol "MJMD".

On February 27, 2014, after the change of control, the Company became a sales and distribution company focused on cannabinoid infused products for the treatment of medical conditions.

As of July 8, 2015, we have changed our business to only focus on Cannabidiol (CBD) products.  CBD is a non-psychotropic cannabinoid that is not restricted as part of the U.S. Controlled Substance Act (CSA), as defined under the 2014 U.S. Farming Bill to be derivatives of the Industrial Hemp plant that contain less than 0.3% tetra-hydro-cannabinol (THC).  We will contract out the manufacturing of the products. Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation and other groups may manufacture our products under our license agreement.

Going Concern

These financial statements have been prepared on a going concern basis, which implies that the Company will continue to realize its assets and discharge its liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company’s total operating expenditure plan for the following twelve months will require significant cash resources to meet the goals of its business plan.  The continuation of the Company as a going concern is dependent upon the continued financial support from its management, and its ability to identify future investment opportunities and obtain the necessary debt or equity financing, and generating profitable operations from the Company’s future operations. These factors raise substantial doubt regarding the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  These financial statements do not include any adjustments to the recoverability and classification of recorded asset amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should the Company be unable to continue as a going concern.  

2.

Summary of Significant Accounting Policies

Basis of Presentation - The financial statements of the Company have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“US GAAP”) and are expressed in U.S. dollars.  The Company’s fiscal year end is February 28

Basis of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of Medi Holdings, Inc. and its wholly-owned subsidiaries.  All significant intercompany balances and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.

Use of Estimates - The preparation of financial statements in conformity with US GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. The Company regularly evaluates estimates and assumptions related to the deferred income tax asset valuation allowances. The Company bases its

25

estimates and assumptions on current facts, historical experience and various other factors that it believes to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying values of assets and liabilities and the accrual of costs and expenses that are not readily apparent from other sources. The actual results experienced by the Company may differ materially and adversely from the Company’s estimates. To the extent there are material differences between the estimates and the actual results, future results of operations will be affected.

A significant item that requires management's estimates and assumptions is the estimate of proved oil reserves which are used in the calculation of depletion, impairment of its properties and asset retirement obligations. Other items subject to estimates and assumptions include the carrying amount of property, plant and equipment, valuation allowances for income taxes, valuation of derivatives instruments and accrued liabilities, among others. Although management believes these estimates are reasonable, actual results could differ from these estimates.

Cash and cash equivalents - The Company considers all highly liquid instruments with a maturity of three months or less at the time of issuance to be cash equivalents. At February 28, 2015 and February 28, 2014, the Company did not hold any cash equivalents.

Accounts receivable - Accounts receivable consists of trade accounts arising in the normal course of business.  No interest is charged on past due accounts.  Accounts receivable are carried at the original invoice amount less a reserve for doubtful receivables based on a review of all outstanding amounts on a monthly basis.

Basic and Diluted Net Loss per Share - The Company computes net loss per share in accordance with ASC 260, Earnings per Share. ASC 260 requires presentation of both basic and diluted earnings per share (“EPS”) on the face of the income statement. Basic EPS is computed by dividing net loss available to common shareholders (numerator) by the weighted average number of shares outstanding (denominator) during the period. Diluted EPS gives effect to all dilutive potential common shares outstanding during the period using the treasury stock method and convertible preferred stock using the if-converted method. In computing diluted EPS, the average stock price for the period is used in determining the number of shares assumed to be purchased from the exercise of stock options or warrants. Diluted EPS excludes all dilutive potential shares if their effect is anti dilutive.  At February 28, 2015, the Company had outstanding stock options outstanding, the Company does not deem these options to be dilutive as the exercise price exceeds the current fair market value of the Company’s common stock.  At February 28, 2015 and 2014, the Company had did not have potentially dilutive shares outstanding.

Financial Instruments - Pursuant to ASC 820, Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures, an entity is required to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. ASC 820 establishes a fair value hierarchy based on the level of independent, objective evidence surrounding the inputs used to measure fair value. A financial instrument’s categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based upon the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. ASC 820 prioritizes the inputs into three levels that may be used to measure fair value:

Level 1 - Level 1 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.

Level 2 - Level 2 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the asset or liability such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in markets with insufficient volume or infrequent transactions (less active markets); or model-derived valuations in which significant inputs are observable or can be derived principally from, or corroborated by, observable market data.

Level 3 - Level 3 applies to assets or liabilities for which there are unobservable inputs to the valuation methodology that are significant to the measurement of the fair value of the assets or liabilities.

26

The Company’s financial instruments consist principally of cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable and accrued liabilities, amounts due to related parties, and convertible debenture. Pursuant to ASC 820, the fair value of our cash is determined based on “Level 1” inputs, which consist of quoted prices in active markets for identical assets. We believe that the recorded values of all of our other financial instruments approximate their current fair values because of their nature and respective maturity dates or durations.

Derivative Financial Instruments - The Company does not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market or foreign currency risks.

The Company reviews the terms of the common stock, warrants and convertible debt it issues to determine whether there are embedded derivative instruments, including embedded conversion options, which are required to be bifurcated and accounted for separately as derivative financial instruments. In circumstances where the host instrument contains more than one embedded derivative instrument, including the conversion option, that is required to be bifurcated, the bifurcated derivative instruments are accounted for as a single, compound derivative instrument.

Bifurcated embedded derivatives are initially recorded at fair value and are then revalued at each reporting date with changes in the fair value reported as non-operating income or expense. The Company uses a Black-Scholes model for valuation of the derivative. When the equity or convertible debt instruments contain embedded derivative instruments that are to be bifurcated and accounted for as liabilities, the total proceeds received are first allocated to the fair value of all the bifurcated derivative instruments. The remaining proceeds, if any, are then allocated to the host instruments themselves, usually resulting in those instruments being recorded at a discount from their face value.

The discount from the face value of the convertible debt, together with the stated interest on the instrument, is amortized over the life of the instrument through periodic charges to interest expense, using the effective interest method.

Derivative instrument liabilities are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether net cash settlement of the derivative instrument could be required within the 12 months of the balance sheet date.

Comprehensive Loss - ASC 220, Comprehensive Income, establishes standards for the reporting and display of comprehensive loss and its components in the financial statements. As at February 28, 2015 and 2014, the Company has no items that represent a comprehensive loss and, therefore, has not included a schedule of comprehensive loss in the financial statements.

Stock-based Compensation - The Company records stock-based compensation in accordance with ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Based Compensation and ASC 505-50 - Equity-Based Payments to Non-Employees. All transactions in which goods or services are the consideration received for the issuance of equity instruments are accounted for based on the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instrument issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.

We account for share-based payments granted to non-employees in accordance with ASC Topic 505, “Equity Based Payments to Non-Employees.” The Company determines the fair value of the stock-based payment as either the fair value of the consideration received or the fair value of the equity instruments issued, whichever is more reliably measurable.  If the fair value of the equity instruments issued is used, it is measured using the stock price and other measurement assumptions as of the earlier of either (1) the date at which a commitment for performance by the counterparty to earn the equity instruments is reached, or (2) the date at which the counterparty’s performance is complete.

The fair value of each share based payment is estimated on the measurement date using the Black-Scholes model with the following assumptions, which are determined at the beginning of each year and utilized in all calculations for that year:

27

Risk-Free Interest Rate. We utilized the U.S. Treasury yield curve in effect at the time of grant with a term consistent with the expected term of our awards.  

Expected Volatility. We calculate the expected volatility based on a volatility index of peer companies as we did not have sufficient historical market information to estimate the volatility of our own stock. 

Dividend Yield. We have not declared a dividend on its common stock since its inception and have no intentions of declaring a dividend in the foreseeable future and therefore used a dividend yield of zero.

Expected Term. The expected term of options granted represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding.  We estimated the expected term of stock options by using the simplified method.  For warrants, the expected term represents the actual term of the warrant.

Forfeitures. Estimates of option forfeitures are based on our experience. We will adjust our estimate of forfeitures over the requisite service period based on the extent to which actual forfeitures differ, or are expected to differ, from such estimates. Changes in estimated forfeitures will be recognized through a cumulative catch-up adjustment in the period of change and will also impact the amount of compensation expense to be recognized in future periods.

Revenue Recognition – The Company recognizes revenue in accordance with SEC Staff Accounting Bulletin Topic 13 when persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists and delivery has occurred, provided the fee is fixed or determinable and collection is probable. The Company assesses whether the fee is fixed and determinable based on the payment terms associated with the transaction. If a fee is based upon a variable such as acceptance by the customer, the Company accounts for the fee as not being fixed and determinable. In these cases, the Company defers revenue and recognizes it when it becomes due and payable. Up-front engagement fees are recorded as deferred revenue and amortized to income on a straight-line basis over the term of the agreement, although the fee is due and payable at the time the agreement is signed or upon annual renewal. Payments related to substantive, performance-based milestones in an agreement are recognized as revenue upon the achievement of the milestones as specified in the underlying agreement when they represent the culmination of the earnings process.

The Company assesses the probability of collection based on a number of factors, including past transaction history with the customer and the current financial condition of the customer. If the Company determines that collection of a fee is not reasonably assured, revenue is deferred until the time collection becomes reasonably assured. Significant management judgment and estimates must be made and used in connection with the revenue recognized in any accounting period. Material differences may result in the amount and timing of our revenue for any period if our management made different judgments or utilized different estimates.

Shipping and Handling costs— shipping and handling costs are included in cost of sales in the Statements of Operations.

Recent Accounting Pronouncements - The recent accounting pronouncements did not have any material impact on the financial statements unless otherwise disclosed, and the Company does not believe that there are any other new accounting pronouncements that have been issued that might have a material impact on its financial position or results of operations

Reclassifications - Certain amounts in the prior period financial statements have been reclassified to conform with the current period presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on previously reported losses, total assets or stockholders equity.

28

3.

Variable Interest Entity

The Company follows the guidelines in FASB Codification of ASC 810 “Consolidation”which indicates "a legal entity that is deemed to be a business need not be evaluated by a reporting entity to determine if the legal entity is a Variable Interest Entity (“VIE")” unless any one of four conditions exist: 

 A VIE is an entity that either (a) has insufficient equity to permit the entity to finance its activities without additional subordinated financial support or (b) has equity investors who lack the characteristics of a controlling financial interest. A VIE is consolidated by its primary beneficiary. The primary beneficiary has both the power to direct the activities that most significantly impact the entity’s economic performance and the obligation to absorb losses or the right to receive benefits from the entity that could potentially be significant to the VIE. If we determine that we have operating power and the obligation to absorb losses or receive benefits, we consolidate the VIE as the primary beneficiary, and if not, we do not consolidate. The Company has not identified any VIEs as of February 28, 2015.

Due to the application of the FASB codification it is management’s opinion that the Company is a VIE under the control of Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals and its shared related parties.  This is primarily due to the fact that the design of the Company was significantly participated in by related parties of Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals and because Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals is exclusively dependent upon the Company for the use, sale, and distribution of its products.

4.

Intangible Assets

Effective September 1, 2014, the Company changed its method of computing amortization from a sales percentage method to the straight-line method for the intangible assets. Based on Statement of Financial Accounting Standards , “Accounting Changes and Error Corrections” FASB ASC 250, the Company determined that the change in depreciation method from an sales percentage method to a straight-line method is a change in accounting estimate affected by a change in accounting principle. Per FASB ASC 250, a change in accounting estimate affected by a change in accounting principle is to be applied prospectively. The change is considered preferable because the straight-line method will more accurately reflect the pattern of usage and the expected benefits of such assets and provide greater consistency with the depreciation methods used by other companies in the Company's industry. The net book value of intangible assets acquired prior to September 1, 2014 with useful lives remaining will be depreciated using the straight-line method prospectively. As a result of the change to the straight-line method of amortizing the Company’s intangible assets, amortization expense increase $1,300,000 for the six month period ended February 28, 2015.

5.

License Agreement - Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

On March 14, 2014, the Company entered into a License Agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation (“Phoenix Bio Pharm”) where Phoenix Bio Pharm has granted exclusive rights to the Company for North America to exploit all presently owned and after-acquired intellectual property rights and know-how of Phoenix Bio Pharm for certain medical cannabinoid products and delivery systems for the treatment and management of illnesses.  The term of the License Agreement is Ten (10) years.  In

29

consideration of the acquired license, the Company issued 26,000,000 shares of common stock to Phoenix Bio Pharm, valued at $13,000,000 based on a discounted cash flow model and the fair value of the assets acquired in the license agreement.  The Company will amortize the cost of the License Agreement over the ten year life.  As of February 28, 2015, the Company has recorded $1,300,000 of amortization expenses related to this License Agreement.  As of February 28, 2015, the Company has evaluated the value of the license agreement and has recorded an impairment loss in the amount of $6,500,000 reducing the book value of the license agreement to $6,500,000.

On January 5, 2015, the Company entered into an additional license agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation to expand the territories covered under its original license agreement dated March 14, 2014.  Under the terms of the additional license agreement, the Company acquired the marketing rights to distribute products developed by Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation in Australia and New Zealand for ten years.  In exchange for the license, the Company has issued 250,000,000 restricted common shares at $0.016 per common share, for an aggregate value of $4,000,000.  This amount represents 33% over the market value on the date of execution of the license agreement.  The Company will begin to amortize the value of the license agreement upon the first sale in one of the two countries covered by the license, and will continue to amortize over the life of the license agreement.  On February 28, 2015, the Company has evaluated the value of the license agreement and has recorded an impairment loss in the amount of $2,000,000 reducing the book value of the license to $2,000,000.

On July 8, 2015, the Company agreed to enter into a new licensing agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation. This new agreement shall replace the previous licensing agreements. The new licensing agreement shall be a non-exclusive, CBD only licensing agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation.  This license agreement operates for a twenty (20) year period.  Phoenix Bio Pharm has granted to the Company a license for the territory of North America, Australia and New Zealand to exploit all presently owned and after-acquired intellectual property rights and know-how of Phoenix Bio Pharm related to CBD based cannabinoid products and delivery systems for the treatment and management of illnesses.  Products falling under the license will include the following CBD products: transdermal patches, orally administered extracts, concentrated extracts for vaporizers and inhalers, sublingual and buccal dispensing products and extraction technology, suppository delivery systems, salves, creams, gels, lotions, and liquid extracts, and any products or active ingredients sourced through Phoenix Bio Pharm affiliates or third party suppliers or licensors.  The Company will also have the right to sublicense the rights acquired pursuant to the license agreement and to use and develop copyrighted materials of Phoenix Bio Pharm for marketing and distribution purposes.  

In addition to the new license agreement, on July 8, 2015 the Company has authorized into an exchange agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharm where all existing common shares held by Phoenix Bio Pharm (276,000,000) are exchanged for 2,000,000 Series B Preferred Shares, par value $0.0001.  These preferred shares are entitled to 100 votes for each share held, and are convertible into 100 common shares at any time at the discretion of the holder.  

6.

Distribution Agreement – Go Kush, Inc.

On May 13, 2014, the Company entered into a distribution agreement with GoKush.com (www.gokush.com) that is part of a not-for-profit California Cooperative Corporation that is dedicated to providing safe and legal access to medical marijuana for patients throughout California.  Pursuant to the Agreement, amongst other things, GoKush agreed to become the online ordering platform for the ordering and re-stock of the Company’s products in California for a ten (10) year term and the Company has issued GoKush 200,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock valued at $172,000.  The Company will amortize the cost of the Distribution Agreement over the ten year life beginning October 2014 when on-line sales of product commenced.  As of February 28, 2015, the Company has recorded $17,200 of amortization expense related to this distribution agreement.

30

7.

CannaVest, Inc.

On December 23, 2014, the Company entered into a convertible promissory note for $1,200,000 with CannaVest Corp.  The note represents $1,200,000 worth of raw material inventory to be obtained from CannaVest Corp. to use in the Company’s cannabidiol product formulations.  The note accrues simple interest at a rate of 10% per annum and is due and payable in six months from the date of issue.  The note cannot be prepaid.  At any time, the outstanding principal amount of this note and all accrued but unpaid interest under this note can be converted into common shares at a price equal to the lesser of $0.02 per common share, the closing sale price, or the average of the lowest closing sale prices of the Company’s common shares during the five trading day period immediately preceding the date of such determination.  

Should the Company default on this convertible promissory note, all outstanding obligations payable by the Company are immediately due and payable.  In addition, CannaVest Corp. may exercise any other right, power or remedy permitted by law.  Further, upon even of default, all unpaid obligations under this note shall bear interest at the rate of 12% per annum.

Warrant Agreement

In connection with the convertible promissory note dated December 23, 2014, the Company subsequently issued warrants to purchase 20,000,000 common shares at an exercise price of $0.02 per common share to Kisha Spendthrift Trust, an affiliate of CannaVest Corp.  These warrants were issued on January 6, 2015.  In exchange for these warrants, the Company shall have access to the technical and management staff of CannaVest Corp. for the development of products to be manufactured from cannabidiol sourced from CannaVest Corp.  The Company has valued these warrants using the black scholes option pricing model at $197,663 and recorded the expense related to the warrants as stock based compensation.

8.

MediHoldings, Inc.

On March 17, 2014, MediHoldings, Inc. (“MediHoldings”), a Colorado corporation, was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

9.

MediSales (CA), Inc.

On June 27, 2014, MediSales (CA), Inc. (“MediSales”), a California corporation, was formed as a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company.

10.

Discontinued Operations

On March 1, 2014, the Company discontinued its prior operations as an oil and gas company and began its operations as a sales and distribution company focused on cannabinoid infused products for the treatment of medical conditions.  The statements for the year ended February 28, 2014 have been adjusted to reflect the accounting treatment related to the discontinued operations.

11.

Related Party Transactions

Martin Tindall

Mr. Martin Tindall, assists the Company with business development activities through the Advisory Services Agreement with Kronos as discussed below.  Mr. Tindall serves as an Executive Director of Kronos.  Mr. Tindall serves as Interim CEO and a Director of Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation.  Mr. Tindall also serves as a director of Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation.

31

Kronos International Investments Ltd. (“Kronos”)

Sublease Agreement:  Effective March 1, 2014, the Company entered into a Sublease Agreement with Kronos International Investments, Ltd for a four (4) year term.  The monthly sublease rent is $2,500 per month.  During the year ended February 28, 2015, the Company paid Kronos $22,500 in rent expense, and paid security deposit of $1,250.

Advisory Services: Effective March 1, 2014, the Company engaged Kronos to provide Advisory Services for a monthly retainer fee of $10,000 per month.  The advisory services include and are not limited to accounting and corporate compliance, business development and strategic planning services, corporate advisory and operational oversight.   Between March 1, 2014 and February 28, 2015, expenses related to the Advisory Services totaled $120,000.

Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (“Phoenix Bio Pharm”)

License Agreement:  On March 14, 2014, the Company entered into a License Agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharm where it has granted exclusive rights to the Company for North America to exploit all presently owned and after-acquired intellectual property rights and know-how of Phoenix Bio Pharm for certain medical cannabinoid products and delivery systems for the treatment and management of illnesses.  The term of the License Agreement is Ten (10) years.  In consideration of the acquired license, the Company issued 26,000,000 shares of common stock to Phoenix Bio Pharm, valued at $13,000,000 based on a discounted cash flow model and the fair value of the assets acquired in the license agreement. The Company will amortize the cost of the License Agreement over the ten year life.  As of February 28, 2015, the Company has recorded $1,300,000 of amortization expense related to this agreement. As of February 28, 2015, the Company has evaluated the value of the license agreement and has recorded an impairment loss in the amount of $6,500,000 reducing the book value of the license agreement to $6,500,000.

On January 5, 2015, the Company entered into an additional license agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation to expand the territories covered under its original license agreement dated March 14, 2014.  Under the terms of the additional license agreement, the Company acquired the marketing rights to distribute products developed by Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation in Australia and New Zealand for ten years.  In exchange for the license, the Company has issued 250,000,000 restricted common shares at $0.016 per common share, for an aggregate value of $4,000,000.  This amount represents 33% over the market value on the date of execution of the license agreement.  The Company will begin to amortize the value of the license agreement upon the first sale in one of the two countries covered by the license, and will continue to amortize over the life of the license agreement.  On February 28, 2015, the Company has evaluated the value of the license agreement and has recorded an impairment loss in the amount of $2,000,000 reducing the book value of the license to $2,000,000.

On July 8, 2015, the Company agreed to enter into a new licensing agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation. This new agreement shall replace the previous licensing agreements. The new licensing agreement shall be a non-exclusive, CBD only licensing agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation.  This license agreement operates for a twenty (20) year period.  Phoenix Bio Pharm has granted to the Company a license for the territory of North America, Australia and New Zealand to exploit all presently owned and after-acquired intellectual property rights and know-how of Phoenix Bio Pharm related to CBD based cannabinoid products and delivery systems for the treatment and management of illnesses.  Products falling under the license will include the following CBD products: transdermal patches, orally administered extracts, concentrated extracts for vaporizers and inhalers, sublingual and buccal dispensing products and extraction technology, suppository delivery systems, salves, creams, gels, lotions, and liquid extracts, and any products or active ingredients sourced through Phoenix Bio Pharm affiliates or third party suppliers or licensors.  The Company will also have the right to sublicense the rights acquired pursuant to the license agreement and to use and develop copyrighted materials of Phoenix Bio Pharm for marketing and distribution purposes.  

32

In addition to the new license agreement, on July 8, 2015 the Company has authorized into an exchange agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharm where all existing common shares held by Phoenix Bio Pharm (276,000,000) are exchanged for 2,000,000 Series B Preferred Shares, par value $0.0001.  These preferred shares are entitled to 100 votes for each share held, and are convertible into 100 common shares at any time at the discretion of the holder.  

Related Party Loan:  Between March 1, 2014 and February 28, 2015, the Company has advanced Phoenix Bio Pharm in the form of a loan in the amount of $197,860. These transactions were originally recorded as prepayment on inventory and have subsequently been reclassified as loans.

Product Development - Between March 1, 2014 and February 28, 2015, the Company has recorded product development expenses paid to Phoenix Bio Pharm totaling $15,000.

Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation (“Phoenix Pharms”)

Loan Funding:  From time to time, Phoenix Pharms has loaned the Company short term loans to cover its working capital needs.  Between March 1, 2014 and February 28, 2015, Phoenix Pharms advanced the Company $10,029.  As of February 28, 2015, this loan was paid in full.

Expense pass-through:  The Company and Phoenix Pharms share pro-rata in certain expenses for shared resources, typically for shared travel and consulting services.  Between March 1, 2014 and February 28, 2015, Phoenix Pharms invoiced pass through expenses to the Company totaling $30,421.   At February 28, 2015, the Company has applied the outstanding balance of $10,525 of pass through expenses against the related party loan as discussed below.

Related Party Loan:  On September 18, 2014, the Company advanced Phoenix Pharms a total of $85,000 as a short term loan.  The loan bears a simple interest rate of 8% and was due and payable on November 30, 2014.  As of February 28, 2015, the Company has received principal payments totaling $26,425 including cash payment of $15,900, and expense offset $10,525.  As of February 28, 2015, accrued interest on this loan is $2,687.  As of February 28, 2015, the outstanding balance due the Company on this related party loan is $61,262

New Product Development Agreement:  On October 23, 2014, the Company entered into a New Product Development Agreement (the “NPD Agreement”) with Phoenix Pharms for use of Phoenix Pharms’ expertise in identifying new product business development opportunities related to expanding the Company’s product offerings.  The NPD Agreement is for a period of four months at $16,000 per month.  As of February 28, 2015, the Company had paid $64,000 towards the NPD Agreement and has no further obligations under the NPD Agreement.

Russell Stone:  Mr. Russell Stone, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, holds less than 5% of the outstanding common shares of Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation indirectly through a trust.

Lewis “Spike” Humer:

Mr. Humer is the interim Chief Executive Officer and a director of the Company. Mr. Humer is a director of Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation and Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Previously, Mr. Humer served as CEO of Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals and CEO of Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation. As of August 2014, the Company began paying Mr. Humer a consulting fee of $1,500 per week.  As of February 28, 2015, the Company has paid Mr. Humer $15,000 and has accrued a related party payable to Mr. Humer of $61,760.

33

12.

Common Stock

The Company has authorized 1,000,000,000 shares of its common stock, $0.001 par value.  On February 28, 2015, there were 361,322,812 shares of common stock issued and outstanding 53,000,000 shares of common stock reserved for issuance.  Effective August 23, 2013, the Company filed a Certificate of Change with the Nevada Secretary of State to give effect to a forward split of our authorized, issued and outstanding shares of common stock on a 10 new for 1 old basis and, consequently, an increase to our authorized share capital from 100,000,000 to 1,000,000,000 common shares, with a par value of $0.001 per share.

On February 27, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares to its Chief Executive Officer, who agreed to retire the 5,000,000 common shares and return them to the unissued, authorized common shares of the Company in exchange for a stock option.

On March 13, 2014, the Company issued 200,000 shares of its restricted common stock to GoKush, Inc. as described in Note 5.  On July 1, 2014, these restricted shares were issued.

On March 14, 2014, the Company issued 26,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to Phoenix Bio Pharm as described in Note 5. On July 1, 2014, these restricted shares were issued.

On January 23, 2015, the Company issued 250,000,000 shares of its restricted common stock to Phoenix Bio Pharm as described in Note 5.

During the year ended February 28, 2015, the Company sold 440,330 shares of its restricted common stock to accredited investors for consideration for proceeds of $375,925.  

On December 9, 2014, the Company issued 5,000,000 shares of its common stock as compensation under two consulting agreements, each for one-year of marketing services. The Company values the issuance of shares at $119,666, which will be amortized over the twelve months beginning November 2014 to October 2015.

On December 16, 2014, the Company issued 6,666,667 shares of its common stock to YP Holdings for $600,000 under a Securities Purchase Agreement as discussed below.

Between January 15, 2015 and February 28, 2015, the Company issued 10,015,845 shares of common stock to Typenex from the conversion of a total principal amount of $38,500 under a Convertible Notes Agreement as discussed in Note 14 below.

13.

Common Stock Options

2014 Stock Awards Plan:  Effective June 4, 2014, the Board of Directors adopted the 2014 Stock Awards Plan (the “Plan”) under which the Company is authorized to grant employees, directors, and consultants (“Participant”) incentive and non-qualified stock options.  Pursuant to the Plan, the Company is authorized to grant an aggregate of 10,000,000 stock options to purchase common stock of the Company.  The stock option price and vesting terms are determined by the Board of Directors or Compensation Committee (the “Committee”), and evidenced by a stock option agreement extended to the Participant.  The options granted generally terminate five years from the date of issuance.

Effective February 27, 2014, the Company’s former CEO and Director was granted incentive stock options to purchase 5,000,000 common shares of the Company at $0.34 per common share valued at $551,363.   Immediately upon the grant of the option, options to purchase 2,500,000 common shares vested.  The option to purchase the remaining 2,500,000 common shares shall vest in equal amounts over the next three years ending February 27, 2017.  As of February 18, 2015, the unvested options totaling 2,500,000 were cancelled upon resignation by the holder.  The remaining 2,500,000 vested options are exercisable until February 17, 2016.

34

The following table describes stock options outstanding and exercisable at February 28, 2015:

*Market Price as defined by the Typenex Note

39

Item 9.  Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

On May 21, 2014, Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC, the independent registered principal accountants of the Company resigned.   The Company’s board of directors participated in and approved the decision to change independent registered public accounting firms pursuant to this resignation.

During the period from May 28, 2013, the date of engagement, to May 21, 2014, the date of resignation, there were no disagreements with Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC, which were not resolved on any matter concerning accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure, or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC, would have caused it to make reference to the subject matter of the disagreements in connection with its reports.  The reports of Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC regarding the Company’s balance sheets as of February 28, 2013 and February 29, 2012 and the statements of operations, stockholders' deficit and cash flows for the years then ended did not provide an adverse opinion or disclaimer of opinion to our financial statements, nor modify its opinion as to uncertainty, audit scope or accounting principles.  The reports of Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC however stated that there is substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern. Further there were no other reportable events, as contemplated by Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K, during the two most recent fiscal years and the interim period up to the date of termination.

We provided Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC, with a copy of this disclosure before its filing with the SEC.  We requested that Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC, provide us with a letter addressed to the SEC stating whether or not it agrees with the above statements.  The letter of Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC, is incorporated into this report as Exhibit 16.1.

On May 22, 2014, our board of directors approved and authorized the engagement of DKM Certified Public Accountants as our independent public accountants.

Prior to engaging DKM Certified Public Accountants on May 22, 2014, DKM Certified Public Accountants did not provide the Company with either written or oral advice that was an important factor considered by Company in reaching a decision to change our independent registered public accounting firm from Goldman Accounting Services CPA, PLLC to DKM Certified Public Accountants.

Item 9A.  Controls and Procedures

Disclosure Controls and Procedures  

We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the "Exchange Act"), that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by us in the reports that we file or submit under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission's rules and forms and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

40

We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures as of February 28, 2015. Based on the evaluation of these disclosure controls and procedures, and in light of the material weaknesses found in our internal controls over financial reporting, our chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer) concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were not effective.

Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting, as defined in Exchange Act Rule 13a-15(f).   The Company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

Under the supervision and with the participation of management, including the chief executive officer and chief financial officer (our principal executive officer, principal financial officer and principal accounting officer), the Company conducted an evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2015 using the criteria established in “Internal Control - Integrated Framework” issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission ("COSO").  

A material weakness is a deficiency, or combination of deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting, such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the Company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.   In its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2013, the Company determined that there were control deficiencies that constituted material weaknesses, as described below.

1.  We do not have an Audit Committee – While not being legally obligated to have an audit committee, it is the management’s view that such a committee, including a financial expert member, is an utmost important entity level control over the Company’s financial statement. Currently the board of directors acts in the capacity of the audit committee, and does not include a member that is considered to be independent of management to provide the necessary oversight over management’s activities.  

2.  We did not maintain appropriate cash controls – As of February 28, 2015, the Company has not maintained sufficient internal controls over financial reporting for the cash process, including failure to segregate cash handling and accounting functions, and did not require dual signature on the Company’s bank accounts.  Alternatively, the effects of poor cash controls were mitigated by the fact that the Company had limited transactions in their bank accounts.

41

3.  We did not implement appropriate information technology controls – As at February 28, 2015, the Company retains copies of all financial data and material agreements; however there is no formal procedure or evidence of normal backup of the Company’s data or off-site storage of the data in the event of theft, misplacement, or loss due to unmitigated factors.  

4.  We did not have any internal personnel who have knowledge of United States Generally Accepted Accounting Principles.  However, we have hired an outsourced accounting firm to ensure transactions are recorded in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles.

Accordingly, the Company concluded that these control deficiencies resulted in a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of the annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis by the Company’s internal controls.

As a result of the material weaknesses described above, management has concluded that the Company did not maintain effective internal control over financial reporting as of February 28, 2015 based on criteria established in Internal Control—Integrated Framework issued by COSO. 

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

This annual report does not include an attestation report of the Company’s registered public accounting firm regarding internal control over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by the Company’s registered public accounting firm pursuant to rules of the SEC that permit the Company to provide only management’s report in this annual report.

Continuing Remediation Efforts to address deficiencies in the Company’s Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Once the Company is engaged in a business of merit and has sufficient personnel available, then our board of Directors, in particular and in connection with the aforementioned deficiencies, will establish the following remediation measures:

1.

Our board of directors will nominate an audit committee or a financial expert on our board of directors in during the fiscal year ended February 29, 2016.

2.

We will appoint additional personnel to assist with the preparation of the Company’s monthly financial reporting, including preparation of the monthly bank reconciliations.

Item 9B.  Other Information

None.

42

PART III

Item 10.  Directors and Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Directors and Executive Officers

All directors of the Company hold office until the next annual meeting of the shareholders or until their successors have been elected and qualified. The officers of the Company are appointed by our board of directors and hold office until their death, resignation or removal from office. Our directors and executive officers, their ages, positions held, and duration as such, are as follows:

(1)

Represents options owned by Ronald Lusk.

Option Exercises

During our fiscal year ended February 28, 2015 there were no options exercised by our named officers.

Compensation of Directors

We do not have any agreements for compensating our directors for their services in their capacity as directors, although such directors are expected in the future to receive stock options to purchase shares of our common stock as awarded by our board of directors.

We have determined that none of our directors are independent directors, as that term is used in Item 7(d)(3)(iv)(B) of Schedule 14A under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and as defined by Rule 4200(a)(15) of the NASDAQ Marketplace Rules.

Pension, Retirement or Similar Benefit Plans

There are no arrangements or plans in which we provide pension, retirement or similar benefits for directors or executive officers. We have no material bonus or profit sharing plans pursuant to which cash or non-cash compensation is or may be paid to our directors or executive officers, except that stock options may be granted at the discretion of the board of directors or a committee thereof.

Indebtedness of Directors, Senior Officers, Executive Officers and Other Management

None of our directors or executive officers or any associate or affiliate of our company during the last two fiscal years, is or has been indebted to our company by way of guarantee, support agreement, letter of credit or other similar agreement or understanding currently outstanding.  

Item 12.  Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

Security Ownership of Management

The following table sets forth certain information concerning the number of shares of our common stock owned beneficially as of July 24, 2015, by: (i) each of our directors; (ii) each of our named executive officers; and (iii) each person or group known by us to beneficially own more than 5% of our outstanding common shares.  Unless otherwise indicated, the shareholders listed below possess sole voting and investment power with respect to the shares they own.

48

49

(1)

The number and percentage of shares beneficially owned is determined under rules of the SEC and the information is not necessarily indicative of beneficial ownership for any other purpose. Under such rules, beneficial ownership includes any shares as to which the individual has sole or shared voting power or investment power and also any shares that the individual has the right to acquire within 60 days through the exercise of any stock option or other right. The persons named in the table have sole voting and investment power with respect to all common shares shown as beneficially owned by them, subject to community property laws where applicable and the information contained in the footnotes to this table.

(2)

Based on 423,927,259 issued and outstanding common shares as of July 24, 2015.

(3)

Russell G. Stone is an officer and a director of the Company. Includes indirect ownership of 22,874 common shares held by Mr. Stone’s spouse and 136,044 common shares held indirectly by Mr. Stone through a trust.

(4)

Lewis “Spike” Humer is a director of the Company.  Includes direct ownership of 824,611 common shares and indirect ownership of 291,000,000 common shares held by Caduceus (15,000,000) and Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals (276,000,000)

(5)

Caduceus Industries LLC is controlled by Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation.

(6)

Lewis “Spike” Humer, a director of the Company, is also an officer and a director Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation and Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation.

(7)

Martin Tindall, an officer of Kronos International Investments and a director and officer of Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation, and a director of Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals.  Includes indirect ownership of 294,245,001 common shares held by Kronos International Investments (3,234,101), Caduceus (15,000,000), and Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticas (291,0000,000)

(8)

YP Holdings, LLC is owned by Michal Yurkowsky, an unrelated party. Includes 6,666,667 shares of common stock and 13,333,334 warrants to purchase common stock as contemplated in this Offering.

(9)

On July 8, 2015, Phoenix Bio Pharm accepted our exchange offer, in which their the company authorized an exchange agreement to exchange,276,000,000 common shares for 2,000,000 Series B preferred Shares.  This exchange has not yet occurred.

Changes in Control

Other than as disclosed, we are unaware of any contract or other arrangement or provisions of our Articles or Bylaws the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change of control of our company. There are not any provisions in our Articles or Bylaws, the operation of which would delay, defer, or prevent a change in control of our company.

Item 13.  Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Except as disclosed herein, no director, executive officer, shareholder holding at least 5% of shares of our common stock, or any family member thereof, had any material interest, direct or indirect, in any transaction, or proposed transaction since the year ended February 28, 2014, in which the amount involved in the transaction exceeded or exceeds the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of our total assets at the year-end for the last three completed fiscal years.

50

Martin Tindall

Mr. Martin Tindall, assists the Company with business development activities through the Advisory Services Agreement with Kronos as discussed below.  Mr. Tindall serves as the CEO of Kronos. Mr. Tindall services as Interim CEO and a Director of Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation.  Mr. Tindall also serves as a director of Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Inc.

Kronos International Investments Ltd.

Sublease Agreement:  Effective March 1, 2014, the Company entered into a Sublease Agreement with Kronos for a four (4) year term.  The monthly sublease rent is $2,500 per month.  During the nine months ended November 30, 2014, the Company paid Kronos $22,500 in rent expense, and paid security deposit of $1,250.

Advisory Services: Effective March 1, 2014, the Company engaged Kronos to provide Advisory Services for a monthly retainer fee of $10,000 per month.  The advisory services include and are not limited to accounting and corporate compliance, business development and strategic planning services, corporate advisory and operational oversight.  Between March 1, 2014 and February 28, 2014, expenses related to the Advisory Services totaled $120,000.

Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals, Corporation.

License Agreement:  On July 8, 2015, the Company agreed to enter into a new licensing agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation. This new agreement shall replace the previous licensing agreements. The new licensing agreement shall be a non-exclusive, CBD only licensing agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation.  This license agreement operates for a twenty (20) year period.  Phoenix Bio Pharm has granted to the Company a license for the territory of North America, Australia and New Zealand to exploit all presently owned and after-acquired intellectual property rights and know-how of Phoenix Bio Pharm related to CBD based cannabinoid products and delivery systems for the treatment and management of illnesses.  Products falling under the license will include the following CBD products: transdermal patches, orally administered extracts, concentrated extracts for vaporizers and inhalers, sublingual and buccal dispensing products and extraction technology, suppository delivery systems, salves, creams, gels, lotions, and liquid extracts, and any products or active ingredients sourced through Phoenix Bio Pharm affiliates or third party suppliers or licensors.  The Company will also have the right to sublicense the rights acquired pursuant to the license agreement and to use and develop copyrighted materials of Phoenix Bio Pharm for marketing and distribution purposes.  

In addition to the new license agreement, on July 8, 2015 the Company has authorized into an exchange agreement with Phoenix Bio Pharm where all existing common shares held by Phoenix Bio Pharm (276,000,000) are exchanged for 2,000,000 Series B Preferred Shares, par value $0.0001.  These preferred shares are entitled to 100 votes for each share held, and are convertible into 100 common shares at any time at the discretion of the holder.  

Related Party Loan:  Between March 1, 2014 and February 28, 2015, the Company has advanced Phoenix Bio Pharm in the form of a loan in the amount of $197,860.

Product Development - Between March 1, 2014 and November 30, 2014, the Company has recorded product development expenses paid to Phoenix Bio Pharm totaling $15,000.

51

Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation

Loan Funding:  From time to time, Phoenix Pharms has loaned the Company short term loans to cover its working capital needs.  Between March 1, 2014 and August 31, 2014, Phoenix Pharms advanced the Company $10,029.  As of August 31, 2014, this loan was paid in full.

Expense pass-through:  The Company and Phoenix Pharms share pro-rata in certain expenses for shared resources, typically for shared travel and consulting services.  Between March 1, 2014 and November 30, 2014, Phoenix Pharms invoiced pass through expenses to the Company totaling $30,421.   At November 30, 2014, the Company has applied the outstanding balance of $9,343 of pass through expenses against the related party loan as discussed below.

Related Party Loan:  On September 18, 2014, the Company advanced Phoenix Pharms a total of $85,000 as a short term loan.  The loan bears a simple interest rate of 8% and was due and payable on November 30, 2014.  As of February 28 2015, $26,425 of principal has been reduced by cash payment of $15,900 and expense offset of $10,525.  As of February 28, 2015 principal and interest outstanding on this related party note total $61,262.

New Product Development Agreement:  On October 23, 2014, the Company entered into a New Product Development Agreement (the “NPD Agreement”) with Phoenix Pharms for use of Phoenix Pharms’ expertise in identifying new product business development opportunities related to expanding the Company’s product offerings.  The NPD Agreement is for a period of four months at $16,000 per month.  As of February 28, 2015, the Company had paid $64,000 towards the NPD Agreement and has no further obligations under the NPD Agreement.

Russell Stone:  Mr. Russell Stone, the Company’s Chief Operating Officer, holds less than 5% of the outstanding common shares of Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation indirectly through a trust.

Lewis “Spike” Humer:

Mr. Humer, serves as the interim Chief Executive Officer and as a director of the Company. Mr. Humer is a director of Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation and Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation. Previously Mr. Humer served as  as CEO of Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals and CEO of Phoenix Pharms Capital Corporation. As of August 2014, the Company began paying Mr. Humer a consulting fee of $1,500 per week.  As of February 28, 2015, the Company has paid Mr. Humer $15,000 and has accrued a related party payable to Mr. Humer of $61,760.

Director Independence

We currently have two directors.  We have determined that we do not have an “independent director” as defined in NASDAQ Marketplace Rule 4200(a)(15).

We do not have a standing audit, compensation or nominating committee, but our entire board of directors acts in such capacities. We believe that our members of our board of directors are capable of analyzing and evaluating our financial statements and understanding internal controls and procedures for financial reporting. The board of directors of our company does not believe that it is necessary to have an audit committee because we believe that the functions of an audit

52

committee can be adequately performed by the board of directors. In addition, we believe that retaining an independent director who would qualify as an “audit committee financial expert” would be overly costly and burdensome and is not warranted in our circumstances given the early stages of our development.

Lock-up Agreements

Pursuant to the registration rights agreement between the Company and YP Holdings, LLC, the Company agreed to several lock-up agreements between itself and four shareholders of the Company: Phoenix Bio Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Ronald Lusk, Lewis Humer, and Caduceus Industries LLC.  Under these agreements, each shareholder has agreed that they will not offer, pledge, sell, contract to sell, grant any options for sale or transfer, distribute or dispose of, directly or indirectly, any shares of the Company for a 90 day period following the date that the registration statement is declared effective.

Item 14.  Principal Accountant Fees and Services

The aggregate fees billed for the most recently completed fiscal years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014 for professional services rendered by the principal accountant for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and services that are normally provided by the accountant in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements for these fiscal periods were as follows:   

Our board of directors pre-approves all services provided by our independent auditors.  All of the above services and fees were reviewed and approved by the board of directors either before or after the respective services were rendered.

Our board of directors has considered the nature and amount of fees billed by our independent auditors and believes that the provision of services for activities unrelated to the audit is compatible with maintaining our independent auditors’ independence.

53

PART IV

Item 15.   Exhibits, Financial Statement Schedules  

(a)(1)  List of Financial statements included in Part II hereof  

Balance Sheets, February 28, 2015 and 2014

Statements of Operations for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Statements of Stockholders' Equity (Deficit) for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Statements of Cash Flows for the years ended February 28, 2015 and 2014

Notes to the Financial Statements  

(a)(2) List of Financial Statement schedules included in Part IV hereof:  None.

(a)(3) Exhibits  

The following exhibits are included herewith:

*XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language) information is furnished and not filed or a part of a registration statement or prospectus for purposes of Sections 11 or 12 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, is deemed not filed for purposes of Section 18 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and otherwise is not subject to liability under these sections.

Following are a list of exhibits which we previously filed in other reports which we filed with the SEC, including the Exhibit No., description of the exhibit and the identity of the Report where the exhibit was filed.

54

55

SIGNATURES

In accordance with Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, the Company caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

MEDIJANE HOLDINGS INC.

/s/Lewis “Spike” Humer

              Dated July 28, 2015

Lewis “Spike” Humer

Interim Chief Executive Officer

Pursuant to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed below by the following persons on behalf of the Company and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

/s/Lewis “Spike” Humer

             Dated July 28, 2015

Lewis “Spike” Humer

Interim Chief Executive Officer

Director

/s/Russell G. Stone

Dated July 28, 2015

Russell G. Stone

Chief Operating Officer

Interim Chief Financial Officer

Director, Controller

56