PILGRIMS PRIDE CORP - Quarter Report: 2005 January (Form 10-Q)

Actual results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking statements as a result of these factors, among others, many of which are beyond our control.

In making these statements, we are not undertaking, and specifically decline to undertake, any obligation to address or update each or any factor in future filings or communications regarding our business or results, and we are not undertaking to address how any of these factors may have caused changes to information contained in previous filings or communications. Although we have attempted to list comprehensively these important cautionary risk factors, we must caution investors and others that other factors may in the future prove to be important and affecting our business or results of operations.

An evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of the Company's management, including the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of the Company's disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Company's management, including the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, concluded that the Company's disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q to provide reasonable assurance that information required to be disclosed by the Company in the reports that it files or submits under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time period specified in the SEC rules and forms.

In connection with the evaluation described above, other than the integration of the ConAgra chicken division acquisition historical account systems to the Company’s systems, the Company’s management, including the Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, identified no change in the Company's internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended January 1, 2005, and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial reporting.

Index

On July 1, 2002, three individuals, on behalf of themselves and a putative class of chicken growers, filed their original class action complaint against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana Division, styled “Cody Wheeler, et al. vs. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation.” The complaint alleges that we violated the Packers and Stockyards Act (7 U.S.C. Section 192) and breached fiduciary duties allegedly owed to the plaintiff growers. The plaintiffs also brought individual actions under the Packers and Stockyards Act alleging common law fraud, negligence, breach of fiduciary duties and breach of contract. The plaintiffs entered into an agreement to stay any certification of the class.  On March 14, 2003, the court entered an order dismissing the plaintiffs’ claim of breach of fiduciary duty and negligence. The plaintiffs also dropped the charges of fraud prior to the entering of the order by the court. We intend to defend vigorously both certification of the case as a class action should it not prevail in the trial of the three plaintiffs and questions concerning ultimate liability and damages, if any. We do not expect this matter to have a material impact on our financial position, operations or liquidity.

In October 2002, a limited number of USDA environmental samples from our Franconia, Pennsylvania plant tested positive for Listeria. As a result, we voluntarily recalled all cooked deli products produced at the plant from May 1, 2002 through October 11, 2002. No illnesses have been linked to any of our recalled products, and none of such products have tested positive for the strain of Listeria associated with an outbreak in the Northeastern U.S. that occurred during the summer of 2002. However, following this recall, a number of demands and cases have been made and filed alleging injuries purportedly arising from the consumption of products produced at this facility. These include: “Lawese Drayton, Individually and as Personal Representative of the Estate of Raymond Drayton, deceased, Plaintiff, v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, Inc. d/b/a JL Foods Co, Inc., Defendants,” which was filed against us in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania on April 15, 2003; “Laron Harvey, by his mother and natural guardian, Shakandra Hampton, and Shakandra Hampton in her own right v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, Inc.,” which was filed in the Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas on May 5, 2003, and has since been removed to the U.S. District Court of the Eastern District of Pennsylvania in Philadelphia; “Ryan and Dana Patterson v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al” which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Passaic County, on August 12, 2003; “Jamar Clarke, an infant under the age of fourteen (14) years, by his mother and natural guardian, Wanda Multrie Clarke, and Wanda Multrie Clarke, individually v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation d/b/a Wampler Foods, Inc., H. Schrier and Co., Inc., Board of Education of the City of New York and Public School 251” which was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of Queens, on August 1, 2003; “Peter Roselle, as Administrator and Prosequendum for the heirs-at-Law of Louis P. Roselle, deceased; and Executor of the Estate of Louis P. Roselle, deceased, and individually v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation, Wampler Foods, Inc., Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, Inc., d.b.a. J.L. Foods Co. Inc.” which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division, Union County, on June 14, 2004; "Jody Levonchuk, administratrix of the Estate of Joseph Cusato v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company." which was filed in the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania, on July 28, 2004; “Mary Samudovsky v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, Inc., et al,” which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Law Division: Camden County, and served on October 26, 2004; Nancy Cirigliano and Scott Fischer v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al,” which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Union County, on August 10, 2004; “Dennis Wysocki, as the Administrator of the Estate of Matthew Tyler Wysocki, deceased, and Dennis Wysocki and Karen Wysocki, individually v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al,” which was filed in the Supreme Court of the State of New York, County of New York, on July 30, 2004; “Randi Carden v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al,” which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Camden County, on August 10, 2004; and “Catherine Dillon, individually and as guardian ad litem for her infant son, Brian Dillon, and Joseph Dillon, individually” v. Pilgrim's Pride Corporation and Jack Lambersky Poultry Company, et al,” which was filed in the Superior Court of New Jersey, Essex County, on September 10, 2004. On August 20, 2004, the Estate of Frank Niemtzow refiled his individual action from the previously filed and voluntarily dismissed class action suit. Neither the likelihood of an unfavorable outcome nor the amount of ultimate liability, if any, with respect to any of these cases can be determined at this time. These cases are in various stages of litigation, and we believe we have meritorious defenses to each of the claims, which we intend to vigorously defend. After considering our available insurance coverage, we do not expect any of these matters to have a material impact on our financial position, operations or liquidity.

On December 31, 2003, we were served with a purported class action complaint styled "Angela Goodwin, Gloria Willis, Johnny Gill, Greg Hamilton, Nathan Robinson, Eddie Gusby, Pat Curry, Persons Similarly Situated v. ConAgra Poultry Company and Pilgrim's Pride, Incorporated" in the United States District Court, Western District of Arkansas, El Dorado Division, alleging racial and age discrimination at one of the facilities we acquired from ConAgra. One of the named plaintiffs, Gloria Willis, was voluntarily dismissed from this action. We believe we have meritorious defenses to the class certification as well as the individual claims and we intend to vigorously oppose class certification and defend these claims. The ultimate liability with respect to these claims cannot be determined at this time, however, we do not expect this matter to have a material impact on our financial position, operations or liquidity.

 

We are subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the ordinary course of our business.  In the opinion of management, the amount of ultimate liability with resect to these actions will not materially affect our financial position or results of operations.

Index