PILGRIMS PRIDE CORP - Quarter Report: 2007 June (Form 10-Q)
UNITED
STATES
SECURITIES
AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington,
D.C. 20549
FORM
10-Q
(Mark
One)
x
|
QUARTERLY
REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the quarterly period ended
June 30,
2007
OR
¨
|
TRANSITION
REPORT PURSUANT TO
SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF
1934
|
For
the transition period from
to
Commission
File number 1-9273
PILGRIM’S
PRIDE CORPORATION
(Exact
name of registrant as specified in its charter)
Delaware
|
75-1285071
|
|||
(State
or other jurisdiction of
|
(I.R.S.
Employer
|
|||
incorporation
or organization)
|
Identification
No.)
|
|||
4845
US Hwy 271 N, Pittsburg, TX
|
75686-0093
|
|||
(Address
of principal executive offices)
|
(Zip
code)
|
|||
Registrant’s
telephone number, including area code: (903)
434-1000
|
Not
Applicable
(Former
name, former address and former fiscal year, if changed since last
report.)
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant (1) has filed all reports required to
be
filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during
the
preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required
to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements
for
the past 90 days. Yes x No ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an
accelerated filer, or a non-accelerated filer. See definition of
“accelerated filer and large accelerated filer” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange
Act. (Check one):
Large
accelerated filer x
Accelerated filer
¨
Non-accelerated filer ¨
Indicate
by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule
12b-2 of the Exchange Act). Yes ¨ No x
Number
of
shares outstanding of the issuer’s common stock, as of July 30, 2007, was
66,555,733.
1
INDEX
PILGRIM’S
PRIDE CORPORATION AND SUBSIDIARIES
|
||
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
||
Item
2.
|
||
Item
3.
|
||
Item
4.
|
||
|
|
|
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
|
||
Item
1.
|
||
Item
1A.
|
||
Item
6.
|
||
2
PART
I. FINANCIAL INFORMATION
|
||||||||
Item
1. Financial
Statements
|
||||||||
Pilgrim’s
Pride
Corporation
|
||||||||
Consolidated
Balance Sheets
|
||||||||
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
June
30, 2007
|
September
30, 2006
|
|||||||
(In
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
||||||||
Assets
|
||||||||
Current
Assets:
|
||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ |
57,390
|
$ |
156,404
|
||||
Investments
in available for sale securities
|
13,782
|
21,246
|
||||||
Trade
accounts and other receivables, less allowance for doubtful accounts
|
450,635
|
263,149
|
||||||
Inventories
|
944,593
|
585,940
|
||||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
37,724
|
39,167
|
||||||
Current
deferred income taxes
|
92,835
|
7,288
|
||||||
Prepaid
expenses
|
22,993
|
10,307
|
||||||
Other
current assets
|
29,968
|
22,173
|
||||||
Total
Current Assets
|
1,649,920
|
1,105,674
|
||||||
Investment
in Available for Sale Securities
|
44,003
|
115,375
|
||||||
Other
Assets
|
87,765
|
50,825
|
||||||
Goodwill
|
509,059
|
--
|
||||||
Property,
Plant and Equipment:
|
||||||||
Land
|
107,927
|
52,493
|
||||||
Buildings,
machinery and equipment
|
2,439,250
|
1,702,949
|
||||||
Autos
and trucks
|
54,121
|
57,177
|
||||||
Construction-in-progress
|
143,958
|
63,853
|
||||||
2,745,256
|
1,876,472
|
|||||||
Less
accumulated depreciation
|
(848,453 | ) | (721,478 | ) | ||||
1,896,803
|
1,154,994
|
|||||||
$ |
4,187,550
|
$ |
2,426,868
|
|||||
Liabilities
and Stockholders’ Equity
|
||||||||
Current
Liabilities:
|
||||||||
Accounts
payable
|
$ |
405,033
|
$ |
293,685
|
||||
Accrued
expenses
|
540,102
|
272,830
|
||||||
Current
maturities of long-term debt
|
3,134
|
10,322
|
||||||
Total
Current Liabilities
|
948,269
|
576,837
|
||||||
Long-Term
Debt, Less Current Maturities
|
1,718,774
|
554,876
|
||||||
Deferred
Income Taxes
|
308,797
|
175,869
|
||||||
Other
Long-Term Liabilities
|
79,747
|
--
|
||||||
Minority
Interest in Subsidiary
|
1,929
|
1,958
|
||||||
Commitments
and Contingencies
|
--
|
--
|
||||||
Stockholders’
Equity:
|
||||||||
Preferred
stock, $.01 par value, 5,000,000 authorized shares; none
issued
|
--
|
--
|
||||||
Common
stock, $.01 par value, 160,000,000 authorized shares;
66,555,733 issued
|
665
|
665
|
||||||
Additional
paid-in capital
|
469,779
|
469,779
|
||||||
Retained
earnings
|
656,086
|
646,750
|
||||||
Accumulated
other comprehensive loss
|
3,504
|
134
|
||||||
Total
Stockholders’ Equity
|
1,130,034
|
1,117,328
|
||||||
$ |
4,187,550
|
$ |
2,426,868
|
See
notes to consolidated financial
statements.
|
3
Pilgrim’s
Pride
Corporation and
Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Operations
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands, except share and per share data)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
2,118,386
|
$ |
1,287,646
|
$ |
5,449,483
|
$ |
3,897,167
|
||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
1,883,148
|
1,244,950
|
5,064,776
|
3,698,870
|
||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
235,238
|
42,696
|
384,707
|
198,297
|
||||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
98,461
|
69,433
|
262,534
|
216,772
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
136,777
|
(26,737 | ) |
122,173
|
(18,475 | ) | ||||||||||
Other
expense (income):
|
||||||||||||||||
Interest
expense
|
40,921
|
12,736
|
94,130
|
38,402
|
||||||||||||
Interest
income
|
(198 | ) | (1,268 | ) | (3,190 | ) | (8,429 | ) | ||||||||
Loss
on early extinguishment of debt
|
--
|
--
|
14,475
|
--
|
||||||||||||
Foreign
exchange (gain) loss
|
(264 | ) |
1,822
|
1,250
|
1,012
|
|||||||||||
Miscellaneous,
net
|
(2,605 | ) | (2,053 | ) | (8,799 | ) | (1,025 | ) | ||||||||
Total
other expenses, net
|
37,854
|
11,237
|
97,866
|
29,960
|
||||||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
98,923
|
(37,974 | ) |
24,307
|
(48,435 | ) | ||||||||||
Income
tax expense (benefit)
|
36,282
|
(17,501 | ) |
10,478
|
(21,686 | ) | ||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ |
62,641
|
$ | (20,473 | ) | $ |
13,829
|
$ | (26,749 | ) | ||||||
Net
income (loss) per common share– basic and diluted
|
$ |
0.94
|
$ | (0.31 | ) | $ |
0.21
|
$ | (0.40 | ) | ||||||
Dividends
declared per common share
|
$ |
0.0225
|
$ |
0.0225
|
$ |
0.0675
|
$ |
1.0675
|
||||||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
66,555,733
|
66,555,733
|
66,555,733
|
66,555,733
|
||||||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ |
62,641
|
$ | (20,473 | ) | $ |
13,829
|
$ | (26,749 | ) | ||||||
Other
comprehensive income (loss)
|
44
|
(523 | ) |
3,370
|
(939 | ) | ||||||||||
Comprehensive
income (loss)
|
$ |
62,685
|
$ | (20,996 | ) | $ |
17,199
|
$ | (27,688 | ) | ||||||
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
4
Pilgrim’s
Pride
Corporation and
Subsidiaries
Consolidated
Statements of Cash Flows
(Unaudited)
|
||||||||
Nine
Months Ended
|
||||||||
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Cash
flows from operating activities:
|
||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ |
13,829
|
$ | (26,749 | ) | |||
Adjustments
to reconcile net income (loss) to cash provided by operating
activities
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
145,678
|
100,052
|
||||||
Loss
on early extinguishment of debt
|
7,099
|
--
|
||||||
Impairment
of assets
|
--
|
3,767
|
||||||
Gain
(loss) on property disposals
|
(492 | ) |
988
|
|||||
Deferred
income taxes
|
1,395
|
(8,065 | ) | |||||
Changes
in operating assets and liabilities, net of effect of businesses
acquired:
|
||||||||
Accounts
and other receivables
|
(56,857 | ) |
97,242
|
|||||
Income
taxes receivable
|
32,474
|
(30,007 | ) | |||||
Inventories
|
(112,353 | ) | (74,792 | ) | ||||
Other
current assets
|
(7,984 | ) | (9,280 | ) | ||||
Accounts
payable and accrued expenses
|
25,466
|
(40,214 | ) | |||||
Other
|
4,647
|
(2,421 | ) | |||||
Cash
provided by operating activities
|
52,902
|
10,521
|
||||||
Cash
flows frominvesting activities:
|
||||||||
Acquisitions
of property, plant and equipment
|
(136,160 | ) | (101,314 | ) | ||||
Business
acquisitions
|
(1,108,817 | ) |
--
|
|||||
Purchases
of investment securities
|
(360,485 | ) | (238,763 | ) | ||||
Proceeds
from sale/maturity of investment securities
|
441,987
|
343,120
|
||||||
Proceeds
from property disposals
|
5,184
|
3,709
|
||||||
Other,
net
|
4,288
|
295
|
||||||
Cash
provided by (used for) investing activities
|
(1,154,003 | ) |
7,047
|
|||||
Cash
flows from financing activities:
|
||||||||
Borrowing
for acquisition
|
1,230,000
|
--
|
||||||
Proceeds
from notes payable to banks
|
--
|
226,000
|
||||||
Repayments
on notes payable to banks
|
--
|
(226,000 | ) | |||||
Proceeds
from long-term debt
|
774,791
|
(34,728 | ) | |||||
Payments
on long-term debt
|
(982,723 | ) |
--
|
|||||
Debt
issue costs
|
(15,565 | ) |
--
|
|||||
Cash
dividends paid
|
(4,493 | ) | (71,048 | ) | ||||
Cash
provided by (used for) financing activities
|
1,002,010
|
(105,776 | ) | |||||
Effect
of exchange rate changes on cash and cash equivalents
|
77
|
(290 | ) | |||||
Decrease
in cash and cash equivalents
|
(99,014 | ) | (88,498 | ) | ||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
156,404
|
132,567
|
||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents at end of period
|
$ |
57,390
|
$ |
44,069
|
||||
See
notes to consolidated financial statements.
|
5
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
NOTES
TO
CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE
A—BASIS OF PRESENTATION
These
unaudited consolidated financial statements include Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation
and its majority-owned subsidiaries (together, “Pilgrim’s,” “the Company,” “we,”
“us,” “our,” or similar terms). We eliminate all significant
intercompany accounts and transactions in consolidation.
These
consolidated financial statements:
·
|
Were
prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted
in
the United States (“GAAP”) for interim financial information and with the
instructions to Form 10-Q and Article 10 of Regulation S-X of the
United
States Securities and Exchange Commission,
and
|
·
|
Do
not include all of the information or footnotes required by GAAP
for
complete financial statements, but
|
·
|
Include
all adjustments, consisting only of normal recurring adjustments,
necessary for a fair presentation of the financial
statements.
|
Operating
results for the period ended June 30, 2007, are not necessarily indicative
of
the results that may be expected for the year ending September 29,
2007. These consolidated financial statements should be read in
conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and supplementary data
contained in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended September 30,
2006.
For
international operations with currencies other than the United States dollar,
we
translate assets and liabilities, other than non-monetary assets, using
current exchange rates. We translate non-monetary assets using the
historical rates in effect on the dates of acquisition. We translate
income and expenses using average exchange rates in effect during the
period.
In
June
2006, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Interpretation
(“FIN”) No. 48, Accounting for Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an
interpretation of FASB Statement No. 109. This
Interpretation clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes
recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements. FIN No. 48 prescribes a
recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement
recognition and measurement of a tax position taken or expected to be taken
in a
tax return. The Company must adopt this Interpretation in the first
quarter of fiscal 2008. The Company has not completed its evaluation
as to the impact that adoption will have on its consolidated financial
statements.
In
September 2006, the FASB issued Statement of Financial Accounting Standards
(“SFAS”) No. 157, Fair Value
Measurements. This Statement defines fair
value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in generally accepted
accounting principles, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
SFAS No. 157 does not require any new fair value measurements. However,
for some enterprises, the application of this Statement will change current
practice. The Company must adopt SFAS No. 157 in the first quarter of
fiscal 2009. Although the Company has not completed its evaluation as to
the
impact that adoption will have on its consolidated financial statements,
it
currently believes the adoption of SFAS No. 157 will not require material
modification of its fair value measurements and will be substantially limited
to
expanded disclosures in the notes to its consolidated financial
statements.
6
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
In
September 2006, the FASB issued SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for
Defined Benefit Pension and Other Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB
Statements No. 87, 88, 106, and 132(R). This Statement
requires us to recognize the funded status of each of our benefit plans—measured
as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the benefit
obligation—in our statement of financial position, recognize as a component of
other comprehensive income, the tax-effected gains or losses and prior service
costs or credits that arise during the period but are not recognized as
components of net periodic benefit cost, and measure defined benefit plan
assets
and obligations as of the date of our fiscal year-end statement of financial
position. We must adopt the recognition and disclosure requirements
of SFAS No. 158 no later than September 29, 2007. We must measure
plan assets and obligations as of the date of our fiscal year-end statement
of
financial position as of September 26, 2009. We are currently in the
process of evaluating the impact that adoption of this Statement will have
on
our consolidated financial statements.
In
January 2007, the FASB issued SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value
Option for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities. This
Statement permits an enterprise to choose to measure many financial instruments
and certain other items at fair value. SFAS No. 159 will become
effective for the Company in the first quarter of fiscal 2009. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact that use of the fair value
measurement option on its financial instruments and other applicable items
would
have on its consolidated financial statements.
NOTE
B – BUSINESS ACQUISITION
On
December 27, 2006, we acquired 45,343,812 shares, representing 88.9% of shares
outstanding, of Gold Kist Inc. (“Gold Kist”) common stock through a tender
offer. We subsequently purchased all remaining Gold Kist shares and,
on January 9, 2007, Gold Kist became a wholly owned subsidiary of the
Company. Gold Kist, based in Atlanta, Georgia, was the third largest
chicken company in the United States, accounting for more than nine percent
of
chicken produced in the United States in recent years. Gold Kist
operated a fully-integrated chicken production business that included live
production, processing, marketing and distribution.
For
financial reporting purposes,
we have included
the
operating results and
cash flows of Gold
Kist in our consolidated
financial
statements
as
of December 31,
2006. The
operating results and cash flows of
Gold Kist from December 27, 2006 to December 31, 2006 were not
material. We have included the acquired assets and assumed
liabilities in our June 30, 2007 balance sheet using a preliminary allocation
of
the purchase price as we have not completed certain appraisals and other
purchase price adjustments.
The
following summarizes our purchase price at December 27, 2006 (in
thousands):
Purchase
50,146,368 shares at $21.00 per share
|
$ |
1,053,074
|
||
Premium
paid on retirement of debt
|
22,208
|
|||
Retirement
of various share-based compensation awards
|
25,677
|
|||
Various
costs and fees
|
45,639
|
|||
Total
purchase price
|
$ |
1,146,598
|
7
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
In
the
second quarter of fiscal 2007, we retired the Gold Kist 10 1/4% Senior Notes
due
2014 with a book value of $128.5 million at a cost of $149.8 million plus
accrued interest and the Gold Kist Subordinated Capital Certificates of
Interest at par plus accrued interest and a premium of one year’s
interest. We also paid acquisition transaction costs and funded
change in control payments to certain Gold Kist employees. This
acquisition was initially funded by (1) $780 million borrowed under our
revolving-term secured credit facility and (2) $450 million borrowed under
our
$450 million Senior Unsecured Term Loan Agreement (“Bridge Loan”) (see Note D–
“Notes Payable and Long Term Debt” below).
In
connection with the acquisition, we elected to freeze certain of the Gold Kist
benefit plans with the intent to ultimately terminate them. We
recorded a purchase price adjustment of $82.5 million representing the current
estimated cost of these plan terminations. We do not anticipate any
material net periodic benefit costs (income) related to these plans in fiscal
2007. Additionally, we conformed Gold Kist’s accounting policies to
our accounting policies and provided for deferred income taxes on all related
purchase adjustments.
The
following summarizes our current estimates of the fair value of the assets
acquired and liabilities assumed at the date of acquisition. The
purchase price allocation is preliminary and will be finalized after completion
of the independent appraisal of certain of the assets acquired and additional
analysis of the liabilities assumed, which is currently underway. Upon
completion of our analysis, significant adjustments may be
required.
Purchase
price allocation:
|
||||
(In
thousands):
|
||||
Current
assets
|
$ |
431,999
|
||
Property,
plant and equipment
|
755,434
|
|||
Goodwill
|
509,059
|
|||
Other
assets
|
64,332
|
|||
Total
assets acquired
|
1,760,824
|
|||
Current
liabilities
|
309,733
|
|||
Long-term
debt, less current maturities
|
140,674
|
|||
Deferred
income taxes
|
85,203
|
|||
Other
long-term liabilities
|
78,616
|
|||
Total
liabilities assumed
|
614,226
|
|||
Total
purchase price
|
$ |
1,146,598
|
Goodwill
represents the purchase price in excess of the value assigned to identifiable
tangible and intangible assets. We elected to acquire Gold Kist at a
price that resulted in the recognition of goodwill because of the following
strategic and financial benefits:
·
|
The
combined company is now positioned as the world's leading chicken
producer
and that position has provided us with enhanced abilities
to:
|
o
|
Compete
more efficiently and provide even better customer
service;
|
o
|
Expand
our geographic reach and customer
base;
|
o
|
Further
pursue value-added and prepared foods opportunities;
and
|
o
|
Offer long-term
growth opportunities for our shareholders, employees, and
growers.
|
·
|
The
combined company is better positioned to compete in the industry
both
internationally and in the United States as additional consolidation
occurs.
|
8
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
The
following unaudited pro forma financial information has been presented as if
the
acquisition had occurred at the beginning of each period presented.
In
thousands, except share and per share data
|
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine Months
Ended
|
||||||||||||||
June
30, 2007
(Actual)
|
July
1, 2006
(Pro
forma)
|
June
30, 2007
(Pro
forma)
|
July
1, 2006
(Pro
forma)
|
|||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
2,118,386
|
$ |
1,791,070
|
$ |
5,977,293
|
$ |
5,471,272
|
||||||||
Depreciation
and amortization
|
$ |
58,005
|
$ |
57,947
|
$ |
170,781
|
$ |
167,893
|
||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$ |
136,777
|
$ | (47,724 | ) | $ |
91,741
|
$ | (79,214 | ) | ||||||
Interest
expense, net
|
$ |
40,723
|
$ |
32,642
|
$ |
116,761
|
$ |
93,935
|
||||||||
Income
(loss) before taxes
|
$ |
98,923
|
$ | (78,908 | ) | $ | (30,508 | ) | $ | (169,309 | ) | |||||
Net
income (loss)
|
$ |
62,641
|
$ | (45,284 | ) | $ | (20,279 | ) | $ | (100,357 | ) | |||||
Net
income (loss) per common share
|
$ |
0.94
|
$ | (0.68 | ) | $ | (0.30 | ) | $ | (1.51 | ) | |||||
Weighted
average shares outstanding
|
66,555,733
|
66,555,733
|
66,555,733
|
66,555,733
|
NOTE
C—INVENTORIES
June
30,
|
September
30,
|
|||||||
(In
thousands)
|
2007
|
2006
|
||||||
Chicken:
|
||||||||
Live
chicken and hens
|
$ |
353,198
|
$ |
196,284
|
||||
Feed
and eggs
|
224,808
|
132,309
|
||||||
Finished
chicken products
|
301,865
|
201,516
|
||||||
879,871
|
530,109
|
|||||||
Turkey:
|
||||||||
Live
turkey and hens
|
$ |
8,239
|
$ |
7,138
|
||||
Feed
and eggs
|
3,935
|
4,740
|
||||||
Finished
turkey products
|
33,221
|
26,685
|
||||||
45,395
|
38,563
|
|||||||
Other
Products:
|
||||||||
Commercial
feed, table eggs, and retail farm store
|
$ |
9,124
|
$ |
7,080
|
||||
Distribution
inventories (other than chicken & turkey products)
|
10,203
|
10,188
|
||||||
19,327
|
17,268
|
|||||||
Total
Inventories
|
$ |
944,593
|
$ |
585,940
|
9
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
NOTE
D—NOTES PAYABLE AND LONG-TERM DEBT
(in
thousands)
|
Final
Maturity
|
June
30, 2007
|
September
30, 2006
|
||||||
Senior
unsecured notes, at 9 5/8%
|
2011
|
$ |
299,286
|
$ |
299,601
|
||||
Senior
subordinated unsecured notes, at 9 1/4%
|
2013
|
5,135
|
82,640
|
||||||
Senior
unsecured notes, at 7 5/8%
|
2015
|
400,000
|
--
|
||||||
Senior
unsecured notes, at 8 3/8%
|
2017
|
250,000
|
--
|
||||||
Secured
revolving credit facility with notes payable at LIBOR plus 1.25%
to LIBOR
plus 2.75%
|
2011
|
51,560
|
74,682
|
||||||
Note
payable to an insurance company at 6.68%
|
2012
|
--
|
50,115
|
||||||
Notes
payable to an insurance company at LIBOR plus 2.2075%
|
2013
|
--
|
41,333
|
||||||
Revolving-term
secured credit facility with notes payable at US Treasuries, plus
a
spread
|
2016
|
--
|
--
|
||||||
Term
credit facility, with notes payable at LIBOR plus 1.75%
|
2016
|
488,650
|
--
|
||||||
Term
loan payable at 7.06%
|
2016
|
109,725
|
--
|
||||||
Term
loan payable at 6.84%
|
2016
|
99,500
|
--
|
||||||
Other
|
Various
|
18,052
|
16,827
|
||||||
1,721,908
|
565,198
|
||||||||
Less
current maturities
|
(3,134 | ) | (10,322 | ) | |||||
Total
|
$ |
1,718,774
|
$ |
554,876
|
On
December 15, 2006, the Company borrowed $100 million at 6.84% under our term
credit facility using the majority of the funds to retire the notes payable
to
an insurance company maturing in 2012 and 2013.
In
January 2007, the Company borrowed (1) $780 million under our revolving-term
secured credit agreement and (2) $450 million under our Bridge Loan
agreement. On January 24, 2007, the Company closed on the sale of
$400 million of 7 5/8% Senior Notes due 2015 (the “Senior Notes”) and $250
million of 8 3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 (the “Subordinated Notes”),
sold at par. Interest is payable on May 1 and November 1 of each
year, beginning November 1, 2007. We may redeem all or part of the
Senior Notes on or after May 1, 2011. We may redeem all or part of
the Subordinated Notes on or after May 1, 2012. Before May 1, 2010,
we also may redeem up to 35% of the aggregate principal amount of each of the
Senior Notes and the Subordinated Notes with the proceeds of certain equity
offerings. Each of these optional redemptions is at a premium as
described in the indentures under which the notes were issued. The
proceeds from the sale of the notes, after underwriting discounts, were used
to
(1) retire the Bridge Loan, (2) repurchase $75.7 million of the Company’s 9 1/4%
Senior Subordinated Notes due 2013 at a premium of $7.4 million plus accrued
interest of $1.3 million and (3) reduce the balance owed under our
revolving-term secured agreement. Early extinguishment of debt of
$14.5 million includes the $7.4 million premium along with unamortized loan
costs of $7.1 million.
10
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
NOTE
E—RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
Lonnie
“Bo” Pilgrim, the Senior Chairman and, through certain related entities, the
major stockholder of the Company (collectively, the “major stockholder”), owns
an egg laying and a chicken growing operation. In addition, at
certain times during previous years, the major stockholder purchased from the
Company live chickens and hens and certain feed inventories during the grow-out
process and then, by contract with the Company, would resell the birds at
maturity using a market-based formula, with price subject to a ceiling price
calculated at his cost plus two percent. No purchases have been made by the
Company under this agreement since the first quarter of fiscal 2006 when the
major stockholder recognized an operating margin of $4,539 on gross amounts
paid
by the Company to the major stockholder as described below in “Live chicken
purchases from major stockholder.”
Much
of
the Company’s debt obligations have been guaranteed by an entity controlled by
the Company’s major stockholders. In consideration of such
guarantees, the Company has paid to Pilgrim Interests, Ltd., an affiliate of
Lonnie “Bo” Pilgrim, the amounts described below in “Loan Guaranty
Fees.”
Transactions
with related parties are summarized as follows:
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30,
|
July
1,
|
June
30,
|
July
1,
|
|||||||||||||
2007
|
2006
|
2007
|
2006
|
|||||||||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Lease
payments on commercial egg property
|
$ |
188
|
$ |
188
|
$ |
563
|
$ |
563
|
||||||||
Contract
grower pay
|
$ |
250
|
$ |
276
|
$ |
651
|
$ |
748
|
||||||||
Other
sales to major stockholder
|
$ |
148
|
$ |
223
|
$ |
460
|
$ |
596
|
||||||||
Live
chicken purchases from major stockholder
|
$ |
--
|
$ |
--
|
$ |
--
|
$ |
231
|
||||||||
Loan
guaranty fees
|
$ |
1,081
|
$ |
468
|
$ |
2,582
|
$ |
1,245
|
||||||||
Lease
payments and operating expenses on airplane
|
$ |
121
|
$ |
129
|
$ |
371
|
$ |
380
|
NOTE
F—COMMITMENTS and CONTINGENCIES
At
June
30, 2007, the Company had $84.9 million in letters of credit outstanding
relating to normal business transactions.
Listed
below are certain claims made against the Company and its subsidiaries. In
the
Company’s opinion, it has made appropriate and adequate reserves, accruals and
disclosures where necessary and the Company believes the probability of a
material loss beyond the amounts accrued to be remote; however, the ultimate
liability for these matters is uncertain, and if accruals and reserves are
not
adequate, an adverse outcome, if significant could have a material effect on
the
consolidated financial condition or results of operations of the Company. The
Company believes it has substantial defenses to the claims made and intends
to
vigorously defend these cases.
Among
the
claims presently pending against the Company are claims brought by current
and
former employees seeking compensation for the time spent donning and doffing
work equipment. The plaintiffs generally purport to bring a
collective action for unpaid wages, unpaid
11
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
overtime
wages, liquidated damages, costs, attorneys' fees, and declaratory and/or
injunctive relief and generally allege that they are not paid for the time
it
takes to either clear security, walk to their respective workstations, don
and
doff protective clothing, and/or sanitize clothing and equipment. We are
aware of an industry-wide investigation by the Wage and Hour Division of the
U.S. Department of Labor to ascertain compliance with various wage and hour
issues, including the compensation of employees for the time spent on activities
such as donning and doffing work equipment. Due, in part, to the
government investigation and the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in IBP,
Inc. v. Alvarez, it is possible that we may be subject to additional
employee claims. We intend to assert vigorous defenses to the
litigation. Nonetheless, there can be no assurances that other
similar claims may not be brought against the Company. The ultimate
liability with respect to these claims cannot be determined at this
time.
On
December 31, 2003, we were served with a purported class action complaint styled
“Angela Goodwin, Gloria Willis, Johnny Gill, Greg Hamilton, Nathan Robinson,
Eddie Gusby, Pat Curry, Persons Similarly Situated v. ConAgra Poultry Company
and Pilgrim’s Pride, Incorporated” in the United States District Court, Western
District of Arkansas, El Dorado Division, alleging racial and age discrimination
at one of the facilities we acquired from ConAgra. Two of the named
plaintiffs, Greg Hamilton and Gloria Willis, were voluntarily dismissed from
this action. On May 15, 2007, the Court denied plaintiff’s motion for
class certification and as the plaintiffs subsequently withdrew their appeal
to
the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals, the Court’s ruling denying class
certification stands as a final judgment. We believe we have
meritorious defenses to the individual claims and we intend to vigorously defend
these claims. After considering our available resources, we do not
expect these cases to have a material impact on our financial position or
results of operations.
We
are
subject to various other legal proceedings and claims which arise in the
ordinary course of our business. In the opinion of management, the
amount of ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially
affect the financial position or results of operations of the
Company.
NOTE
G—BUSINESS SEGMENTS
We
operate in three reportable business segments as (1) a producer and seller
of
chicken products, (2) a producer and seller of turkey products and (3) and
seller of other products.
The
following table presents certain information regarding our
segments:
12
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30, 2007(a)
|
July
1, 2006
|
June
30, 2007(a)
|
July
1, 2006
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
Sales to Customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Chicken:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
1,809,317
|
$ |
1,019,918
|
$ |
4,523,729
|
$ |
3,039,292
|
||||||||
Mexico
|
131,636
|
106,996
|
365,591
|
303,430
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
1,940,953
|
1,126,914
|
4,889,320
|
3,342,722
|
||||||||||||
Turkey
|
18,915
|
15,753
|
83,021
|
94,772
|
||||||||||||
Other
Products:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
152,766
|
137,997
|
464,935
|
445,610
|
||||||||||||
Mexico
|
5,752
|
6,982
|
12,207
|
14,063
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
158,518
|
144,979
|
477,142
|
459,673
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
2,118,386
|
$ |
1,287,646
|
$ |
5,449,483
|
$ |
3,897,167
|
||||||||
Operating
Income (Loss):
|
||||||||||||||||
Chicken:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
116,749
|
$ | (20,158 | ) | $ |
101,155
|
$ | (4,012 | ) | ||||||
Mexico
|
14,427
|
(4,951 | ) |
3,151
|
(10,177 | ) | ||||||||||
Sub-total
|
131,176
|
(25,109 | ) |
104,306
|
(14,189 | ) | ||||||||||
Turkey(b)
|
(1,915 | ) | (3,598 | ) |
852
|
(15,956 | ) | |||||||||
Other
Products:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
6,668
|
1,597
|
15,080
|
10,501
|
||||||||||||
Mexico
|
848
|
373
|
1,935
|
1,169
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
7,516
|
1,970
|
17,015
|
11,670
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
136,777
|
$ | (26,737 | ) | $ |
122,173
|
$ | (18,475 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation
and Amortization(c):
|
||||||||||||||||
Chicken:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
53,629
|
$ |
29,400
|
$ |
130,120
|
$ |
79,911
|
||||||||
Mexico
|
2,754
|
2,752
|
8,306
|
8,470
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
56,383
|
32,152
|
138,426
|
88,381
|
||||||||||||
Turkey
|
404
|
705
|
1,179
|
6,025
|
||||||||||||
Other
Products:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
1,160
|
2,060
|
5,917
|
5,527
|
||||||||||||
Mexico
|
58
|
43
|
156
|
119
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
1,218
|
2,103
|
6,073
|
5,646
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
58,005
|
$ |
34,960
|
$ |
145,678
|
$ |
100,052
|
June
30, 2007(a)
|
September
30, 2006
|
|||||||
(in
thousands)
|
||||||||
Total
Assets:
|
||||||||
Chicken
|
||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
3,619,620
|
$ |
1,897,763
|
||||
Mexico
|
381,982
|
361,887
|
||||||
Sub-total
|
4,001,602
|
2,259,650
|
||||||
Turkey
|
68,521
|
76,908
|
||||||
Other
Products
|
||||||||
United
States
|
113,727
|
88,650
|
||||||
Mexico
|
3,700
|
1,660
|
||||||
Sub-total
|
117,427
|
90,310
|
||||||
Total
|
$ |
4,187,550
|
$ |
2,426,868
|
13
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
(a)
|
The
Company acquired Gold Kist on December 27, 2006. The net assets
acquired have been included in our consolidated financial position
since
December 27, 2006, and the Gold Kist results of operations have been
included in our consolidated results of operations since December
31,
2006. See Note B – “Business Acquisition”
above.
|
(b)
|
Included
in the operating losses for the turkey segment for the nine months
ended
July 1, 2006 are charges of $3.8 million to write certain assets
down to
estimated realizable value. These assets are held for sale and
are related to the Franconia, Pennsylvania turkey cooking facility
at
which the Company ceased production of certain products in March
2006. Also included in the operating losses for the turkey
segment for the same nine month period are accrued severance expenses
totaling $0.2 million and charges of $2.5 million to reduce certain
packaging and supplies, bringing the total charges for the nine months
ended July 1, 2006 to $6.5 million.
|
(c)
|
Includes
amortization of capitalized financing costs of approximately $1.1
million
and $0.5 million for the three month periods and $2.9 million and
$2.0
million for the nine month periods ending June 30, 2007 and July
1, 2006,
respectively.
|
Item
2. Management’s
Discussion and Analysis of
Financial Condition and Results of Operations
Description
of the Company
Pilgrim’s
Pride Corporation is the largest chicken company in the United States and Puerto
Rico, is the second-largest chicken company in Mexico, and has one of the
best-known brand names in the poultry industry. In the United States,
we produce both prepared and fresh chicken and fresh turkey. In
Mexico and Puerto Rico, we exclusively produce fresh chicken. Through
vertical integration, we control the breeding, hatching and growing of
chickens. Our products are sold to foodservice, retail, and frozen
entrée customers primarily through foodservice distributors, retailers, and
restaurants throughout the United States and Puerto Rico and in the northern
and
central regions of Mexico. We operate in three business segments and
two geographical areas.
Business
Acquisition
On
December 27, 2006, we acquired 88.9% of all outstanding common shares of
Atlanta-based Gold Kist Inc. Gold Kist was the third largest chicken
company in the United States, accounting for approximately 9% of all chicken
produced domestically in recent years. On January 9, 2007, we
acquired the remaining Gold Kist common shares, making Gold Kist a wholly owned
subsidiary of Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation. The assets and liabilities
of Gold Kist have been included in the accompanying balance sheet using an
allocation based on preliminary valuations and purchase price
adjustments. See Note B – “Business Acquisition” of the notes to our
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report.
We
are in
the process of fully integrating the operations of Gold Kist into the
Company. We intend to do this as rapidly as possible without
interrupting the business. We expect the acquisition and its
integration will result in significant cost saving opportunities and enhanced
growth. We are currently preparing an optimization plan for all
production and distribution facilities and determining and implementing a “best
practice” approach across all operations.
14
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Executive Summary
Executive Summary
Although
industry production numbers have increased on a year-over-year basis in the
last
few weeks, industry-wide production cutbacks implemented earlier in 2007 along
with strong demand for our products created an improved pricing environment
for
our products in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 when compared to the same
prior
year period. This allowed the Company to return to profitability in
spite of increases in the cost of feed ingredients during the
quarter. Average selling prices achieved in the third quarter of
fiscal 2007 increased by 3.0% over those achieved in the second quarter of
fiscal 2007 and by 17.5% over those achieved in the third quarter of fiscal
2006. Average feed ingredients costs incurred in the third quarter of
fiscal 2007 increased by 1.7% over those incurred in the second quarter of
the
fiscal 2007 and by 39.2% over those incurred in the third quarter of fiscal
2006.
Net
income for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 increased $83.1 million to $62.6
million compared to the net loss of $20.5 million for the third quarter of
fiscal 2006. This improvement is primarily driven by:
§
|
A
21.2% increase in our U.S. chicken selling prices on top of a 46.4%
increase in volumes due to the acquisition of Gold
Kist.
|
Offsetting
the price and volume improvements were the following:
§
|
Increased
cost of sales due to higher feed costs between the two periods, as
feed
ingredients costs rose 41.4% and 27.6% in the U.S. and Mexico chicken
divisions, respectively, due primarily to corn and soybean meal
prices.
|
§
|
Net
interest expense increased $29.3 million between the periods due
primarily
to the financing of the acquisition of Gold
Kist.
|
Net
income for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 increased $40.5 million to
$13.8
million compared to the net loss of $26.7 million for the first nine months
of
fiscal 2006. This increase is primarily driven by the
following:
§
|
A
9.8% increase in our U.S. chicken selling prices on top of a 35.6%
increase in volumes due to the acquisition of Gold
Kist.
|
Offsetting
the price and volume improvements were the following:
§
|
Increased
cost of sales due to higher feed costs between the two
periods. Feed ingredients costs rose 38.1% and 31.8% in the
U.S. and Mexico chicken divisions, respectively, due primarily to
corn and
soybean meal prices.
|
§
|
Net
interest expense increased $61.0 million in the first nine months
of
fiscal 2007, when compared to the same period in fiscal 2006, due
primarily to the financing of the acquisition of Gold
Kist.
|
§
|
A
$14.5 million loss on the early extinguishment of debt during the
second
quarter of fiscal 2007.
|
15
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Business
Environment
Profitability
in the poultry industry is materially affected by the commodity prices of feed
ingredients, chicken and turkey, which are determined by supply and demand
factors. As a result, the chicken and turkey industries are subject
to cyclical earnings fluctuations. Cyclical earnings fluctuations can
be mitigated somewhat by:
- Business
strategy;
- Product
mix;
- Sales
and marketing plans;
and
- Operating
efficiencies.
In
an
effort to reduce price volatility and to generate higher, more consistent profit
margins, we have concentrated on the production and marketing of prepared foods
products. Prepared foods products generally have higher profit
margins than our other products. Also, the production and sale in the
U.S. of prepared foods products reduces the impact of the costs of feed
ingredients on our profitability. Feed ingredient purchases are the
single largest component of our cost of sales, representing approximately 33.5%
of our consolidated cost of sales in the first nine months of fiscal
2007. The production of feed ingredients is positively or negatively
affected primarily by weather patterns throughout the world, the global level
of
supply inventories and demand for feed ingredients, and the agricultural
policies of the U.S. and foreign governments. As further processing
is performed, feed ingredient costs become a decreasing percentage of a
product’s total production cost, thereby reducing their impact on our
profitability. Products sold in this form enable us to charge a
premium, reduce the impact of feed ingredient costs on our profitability and
improve and stabilize our profit margins. However, prepared foods
products are often sold pursuant to longer-term (i.e., generally with one-year
durations), fixed price contract arrangements. Accordingly, input
cost fluctuations may positively or negatively affect the comparative margins
for these products versus commodity product types to the extent such costs
are
not fully or effectively hedged.
As
a
significant portion of the U.S. chicken production is exported, the commodity
prices of chicken and turkey can be, and in the first six months of fiscal
2006
were, adversely affected by disruptions in export
markets. Disruptions of international demand for chicken products in
the first six months of fiscal 2006 were created by the focus and concern of
foreign markets over avian influenza. Disruptions were also caused by
the need to reroute products in transit to locations other than those intended
as these concerns materialized. Disruptions at times may also be
caused by restrictions on imports of U.S.-produced poultry products imposed
by
foreign governments for a variety of reasons, including the protection of their
domestic poultry producers and allegations of consumer health
issues. For example, Russia, China and Japan have restricted the
importation of U.S.-produced poultry for both of these reasons in recent
periods. In July 2003, the U.S. and Mexico entered into a safeguard
agreement with regard to imports into Mexico of chicken leg quarters from the
U.S. Under this agreement, a tariff rate for chicken leg quarters of
98.8% of the sales price was established. This tariff rate was
reduced on January 1, 2007 to 19.8% and is scheduled to be eliminated on January
1, 2008. The tariff was imposed due to concerns that the duty-free
importation of such products as provided by the North American Free Trade
Agreement would injure Mexico’s chicken industry. As such tariffs are
reduced, we expect greater amounts of chicken to be imported into Mexico from
the U.S., which could negatively affect the profitability of Mexican chicken
producers and positively affect the profitability of U.S. exporters of chicken
to Mexico. Although this could have a negative impact on our Mexican
chicken operations, we believe that this will be mitigated by the close
proximity of our U.S. operations to the Mexico border. We have the
largest U.S. production and distribution capacities near the Mexican border,
which gives us a strategic advantage to capitalize on exports of U.S. chicken
to
Mexico. Because these disruptions in chicken export markets are often
political, no assurances can be given as to when the existing disruptions will
be alleviated or that new ones will not arise.
16
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Business Segments
Business Segments
We
operate in three reportable business segments as (1) a producer and seller
of
chicken products, (2) a producer and seller of turkey products and (3) seller
of
other products.
The
following table presents certain information regarding our
segments:
17
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30, 2007(a)
|
July
1, 2006
|
June
30, 2007(a)
|
July
1, 2006
|
|||||||||||||
(In
thousands)
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
Sales to Customers:
|
||||||||||||||||
Chicken:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
1,809,317
|
$ |
1,019,918
|
$ |
4,523,729
|
$ |
3,039,292
|
||||||||
Mexico
|
131,636
|
106,996
|
365,591
|
303,430
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
1,940,953
|
1,126,914
|
4,889,320
|
3,342,722
|
||||||||||||
Turkey
|
18,915
|
15,753
|
83,021
|
94,772
|
||||||||||||
Other
Products:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
152,766
|
137,997
|
464,935
|
445,610
|
||||||||||||
Mexico
|
5,752
|
6,982
|
12,207
|
14,063
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
158,518
|
144,979
|
477,142
|
459,673
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
2,118,386
|
$ |
1,287,646
|
$ |
5,449,483
|
$ |
3,897,167
|
||||||||
Operating
Income (Loss):
|
||||||||||||||||
Chicken:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
116,749
|
$ | (20,158 | ) | $ |
101,155
|
$ | (4,012 | ) | ||||||
Mexico
|
14,427
|
(4,951 | ) |
3,151
|
(10,177 | ) | ||||||||||
Sub-total
|
131,176
|
(25,109 | ) |
104,306
|
(14,189 | ) | ||||||||||
Turkey(b)
|
(1,915 | ) | (3,598 | ) |
852
|
(15,956 | ) | |||||||||
Other
Products:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
6,668
|
1,597
|
15,080
|
10,501
|
||||||||||||
Mexico
|
848
|
373
|
1,935
|
1,169
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
7,516
|
1,970
|
17,015
|
11,670
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
136,777
|
$ | (26,737 | ) | $ |
122,173
|
$ | (18,475 | ) | ||||||
Depreciation
and Amortization(c)
|
||||||||||||||||
Chicken:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
53,629
|
$ |
29,400
|
$ |
130,120
|
$ |
79,911
|
||||||||
Mexico
|
2,754
|
2,752
|
8,306
|
8,470
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
56,383
|
32,152
|
138,426
|
88,381
|
||||||||||||
Turkey
|
404
|
705
|
1,179
|
6,025
|
||||||||||||
Other
Products:
|
||||||||||||||||
United
States
|
1,160
|
2,060
|
5,917
|
5,527
|
||||||||||||
Mexico
|
58
|
43
|
156
|
119
|
||||||||||||
Sub-total
|
1,218
|
2,103
|
6,073
|
5,646
|
||||||||||||
Total
|
$ |
58,005
|
$ |
34,960
|
$ |
145,678
|
$ |
100,052
|
(a)
|
The
Company acquired Gold Kist on December 27, 2006. The
acquisition has been accounted for as a purchase and the Gold Kist
results
of operations have been included in our consolidated results of operations
since December 31, 2006. See Note B – “Business Acquisition” of
the notes to the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere
in
the Quarterly Report.
|
(b)
|
Included
in the operating losses for the turkey segment for the nine months
ended
July 1, 2006 are charges of $3.8 million to write certain assets
down to
estimated realizable value. These assets are held for sale and
are related to the Franconia, Pennsylvania turkey cooking facility
at
which the Company ceased production of certain products in March
2006. Also included in the operating losses for the turkey
segment for the same nine month period are accrued severance expenses
totaling $0.2 million and charges of $2.5 million to reduce certain
packaging and supplies, bringing the total charges for the nine months
ended July 1, 2006 to $6.5 million.
|
(c)
|
Includes
amortization of capitalized financing costs of approximately $1.1
million
and $0.5 million for the three month periods and $2.9 million and
$2.0
million for the nine month periods ending June 30, 2007 and July
1, 2006,
respectively.
|
18
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
The
following table presents certain items as a percentage of net sales for the
periods indicated:
Percentage
of Net Sales
|
||||||||||||||||
Three
Months Ended
|
Nine
Months Ended
|
|||||||||||||||
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
|||||||||||||
Net
Sales
|
100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | ||||||||
Costs
and Expenses:
|
||||||||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
88.9 | % | 96.7 | % | 92.9 | % | 94.9 | % | ||||||||
Gross
profit
|
11.1 | % | 3.3 | % | 7.1 | % | 5.1 | % | ||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative
|
4.6 | % | 5.4 | % | 4.8 | % | 5.6 | % | ||||||||
Operating
Income (Loss)
|
6.5 | % | (2.1 | )% | 2.2 | % | (0.5 | )% | ||||||||
Interest
expense
|
1.9 | % | 1.0 | % | 1.7 | % | 1.0 | % | ||||||||
Interest
income
|
-- | % | (0.1 | )% | (0.1 | )% | (0.2 | )% | ||||||||
Income
(loss) before income taxes
|
4.7 | % | (2.9 | )% | 0.4 | % | (1.2 | )% | ||||||||
Net
income (loss)
|
3.0 | % | (1.6 | )% | 0.3 | % | (0.7 | )% |
Results
of Operations
The
changes in our results of operations for the three-month and nine-month periods
ending June 30, 2007, as compared to the same periods in fiscal 2006
are impacted greatly as a result of the acquisition of Gold Kist on December
27,
2006 as discussed in Note B – “Business Acquisition” of the notes to the
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report. The acquisition resulted in significant increases in net
sales and related costs, including interest expense.
Fiscal
Third Quarter 2007 Compared to Fiscal Third Quarter
2006
Net
Sales. Net Sales for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 increased
$830.8 million, or 64.5%, over the third quarter of fiscal 2006. The
following table provides additional information regarding net sales (in
millions):
Change
from
|
|||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Percentage
|
|||||||||||
Source
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
Change
|
||||||||||
Chicken-
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
1,809.4
|
$ |
789.5
|
77.4 | % |
(a)
|
||||||
Mexico
|
131.6
|
24.6
|
23.0 | % |
(b)
|
||||||||
$ |
1,941.0
|
$ |
814.1
|
72.2 | % | ||||||||
Turkey
|
$ |
18.9
|
$ |
3.1
|
19.6 | % |
(c)
|
||||||
Other
Products-
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
152.7
|
$ |
14.8
|
10.7 | % | |||||||
Mexico
|
5.8
|
(1.2 | ) | (17.1 | )% | ||||||||
$ |
158.5
|
$ |
13.6
|
9.4 | % |
(d)
|
|||||||
$ |
2,118.4
|
$ |
830.8
|
64.5 | % |
19
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
(a)
|
U.S.
chicken sales for the quarter increased compared to the same quarter
last
fiscal year due primarily to the acquisition of Gold Kist Inc., whose
results are included for the full quarter, offset in part by a reduction
in sales resulting from our previously announced 5% year-over-year
production cuts. Also, sales rose due to a 21.2% increase in
net revenue per pound sold.
|
(b)
|
Mexico
chicken sales increased compared to the third quarter of last fiscal
year
because of a 28.7% increase in revenue per pound sold partially offset
by
a 4.4% decrease in pounds sold.
|
(c)
|
Turkey
sales increased compared to the third quarter of the last fiscal
year due
to a 13.9% increase in pounds sold resulting from an acceleration
of
product orders, a 1.8% increase in pounds produced and a 5.5% increase
in
revenue per pound sold.
|
(d)
|
Other
product sales increased due to the addition of the distribution centers
added through the Gold Kist acquisition offset somewhat by reduced
Mexico
non-poultry sales.
|
Gross
Profit. Gross profit increased $192.5 million in the third
quarter of fiscal 2007 compared to the third quarter of fiscal 2006
The
following table provides gross profit information (in millions):
Percentage
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Quarter
|
Change
From
|
of
Net Sales
|
of
Net Sales
|
||||||||||||||||||
Ended
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Percentage
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Quarter Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
Components
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
Change
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
2,118.4
|
$ |
830.8
|
64.5 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
1,883.2
|
638.3
|
51.3 | % | 88.9 | % | 96.7 | % |
(a)
|
||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ |
235.2
|
$ |
192.5
|
450.8 | % | 11.1 | % | 3.3 | % |
(b)
|
||||||||||
(a)
|
Cost
of sales increased compared to the same quarter last fiscal year
due to
the acquisition of Gold Kist and a 39.2% increase in the cost of
feed.
|
(b)
|
Gross
profit increased $192.5 million due to increased selling prices and
the
acquisition of Gold Kist offset in part by increased cost of
feed.
|
20
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Operating
Income (Loss). Operating income for the third quarter of fiscal
2007 increased $163.5 million when compared to the third quarter of fiscal
2006.
The
following tables provide operating income (loss) information (in
millions):
Change
from
|
||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||
Source
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
Change
|
|||||||||
Chicken
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
116.8
|
$ |
136.9
|
681.1 | % | ||||||
Mexico
|
14.4
|
19.4
|
388.0 | % | ||||||||
$ |
131.2
|
$ |
156.3
|
622.7 | % | |||||||
Turkey
|
$ | (1.9 | ) | $ |
1.7
|
47.2 | % | |||||
Other
Products
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
6.7
|
$ |
5.1
|
318.8 | % | ||||||
Mexico
|
0.8
|
0.4
|
100.0 | % | ||||||||
$ |
7.5
|
$ |
5.5
|
275.0 | % | |||||||
Operating
Income (Loss)
|
$ |
136.8
|
$ |
163.5
|
612.4 | % |
Percentage
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Change
from
|
of
Net Sales
|
of
Net Sales
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Quarter
Ended
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Percentage
|
Quarter
Ended
|
Quarter
Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
Components
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
Change
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ |
235.2
|
$ |
192.5
|
450.8 | % | 11.1 | % | 3.3 | % | |||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
98.4
|
29.0
|
41.8 | % | 4.6 | % | 5.4 | % |
(a)
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income (loss)
|
$ |
136.8
|
$ |
163.5
|
612.4 | % | 6.5 | % | (2.1 | )% |
(b)
|
(a)
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense decreased as a percentage of net
sales
due primarily to added revenue from the Gold Kist
acquisition. However, overall selling, general and
administrative expense increased $29.0 million, primarily due to
the Gold
Kist acquisition and costs associated with our profit-based retirement
and
compensation plans.
|
(b)
|
Increased
operating income is primarily due to the items discussed above under
gross
profit offset by the increase in selling, general and administrative
expense.
|
Interest
Expense. Interest expense increased $28.2 million to
$40.9 million in the third quarter of fiscal 2007, when compared to $12.7
million for the third quarter of fiscal 2006, due primarily to the funds
borrowed to complete the Gold Kist acquisition. As a percentage of
sales, interest expense in the third quarter of fiscal 2007 increased to 1.9%
from 1.0% in the third quarter of fiscal 2006.
21
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Interest
Income. Interest income decreased to $0.2 million in the third
quarter of fiscal 2007 from $1.3 million in the third quarter of fiscal
2006 due
to reduced investments.
Miscellaneous,
Net. Consolidated miscellaneous, net expense (income) of $(2.6)
million for the third quarter of fiscal 2007 consisted mainly of investment
and
dividend income. Miscellaneous, net was $(2.1) million for the third
quarter of fiscal 2006.
Income
Tax Expense (Benefit). Consolidated income tax expense in the
third quarter of fiscal 2007 was $36.3 million, compared to a benefit of $(17.5)
million in the third quarter of fiscal 2006. This change resulted
principally from the improvement in our profitability in the current
period.
First
Nine Months of Fiscal 2007 Compared to First Nine Months of Fiscal
2006
Net
Sales. Net Sales for the first nine months of fiscal 2007
increased $1.55 billion, or 39.8%, versus the first nine months of fiscal
2006. The following table provides additional information regarding
net sales (in millions):
Nine
Months
|
Change
from
Nine
Months
|
||||||||||||
Ended
|
Ended
|
Percentage
|
|||||||||||
Source
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
Change
|
||||||||||
Chicken-
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
4,523.7
|
$ |
1,484.4
|
48.8 | % |
(a)
|
||||||
Mexico
|
365.6
|
62.2
|
20.5 | % |
(b)
|
||||||||
$ |
4,889.3
|
$ |
1,546.6
|
46.3 | % | ||||||||
Turkey
|
$ |
83.0
|
$ | (11.8 | ) | (12.4 | )% |
(c)
|
|||||
Other
Products-
|
|||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
465.0
|
$ |
19.4
|
4.4 | % |
(d)
|
||||||
Mexico
|
12.2
|
(1.9 | ) | (13.5 | )% | ||||||||
$ |
477.2
|
$ |
17.5
|
3.8 | % | ||||||||
$ |
5,449.5
|
$ |
1,552.3
|
39.8 | % |
(a)
|
U.S.
chicken sales for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 were 48.8%
more
than the first nine months of fiscal 2006 because of a 35.6% increase
in
pounds sold resulting from the Gold Kist acquisition and a 9.8% increase
in net revenue per pound sold, offset in part by a reduction in sales
resulting from our previously announced 5% year-over-year production
cuts
which became fully effective in January 2007.
|
(b)
|
Mexico
chicken sales increased due to a 19.5% increase in net revenue per
pound
sold during the first nine months of fiscal 2007 versus the first
nine
months of fiscal 2006 and a 0.8% increase in pounds
sold.
|
(c)
|
Turkey
sales declined because of the March 2006 discontinuation of certain
products.
|
(d)
|
Other
product sales increased primarily because of the addition of legacy
Gold
Kist distribution centers offset somewhat by reduced Mexico non-poultry
sales.
|
22
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Gross
Profit. Gross profit increased $186.4 million, or 94.0%, in the
first nine months of fiscal 2007 compared to the first nine months of fiscal
2006.
The
following table provides gross profit information (in millions):
Percentage
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Change
From
|
of
Net Sales
|
of
Net Sales
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Nine
|
Nine
|
Nine
|
Nine
|
||||||||||||||||||
Months
Ended
|
Months
Ended
|
Percentage
|
Months
Ended
|
Months
Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
Components
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
Change
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Net
sales
|
$ |
5,449.5
|
$ |
1,552.3
|
39.8 | % | 100.0 | % | 100.0 | % | |||||||||||
Cost
of sales
|
5,064.8
|
1,365.9
|
36.9 | % | 92.9 | % | 94.9 | % |
(a)
|
||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ |
384.7
|
$ |
186.4
|
94.0 | % | 7.1 | % | 5.1 | % |
(b)
|
||||||||||
(a)
|
Cost
of sales increased $1.37 billion due primarily to the Gold Kist
acquisition and a 36.3% increase in feed costs. These increases
were offset by a $24.5 million decrease in the cost of sales in the
turkey
division due to the decision to cease production on March 3, 2006,
of
certain products at our Franconia, Pennsylvania turkey cooking
facility. Included in cost of sales for the first nine months
of fiscal 2006 was a charge of $3.8 million to impair the carrying
value
of certain equipment currently held for sale and formerly used in
our
turkey division, a charge of $2.5 million to reduce the carrying
value of
certain packaging and supplies associated with those products and
$0.2
million for severance costs.
|
(b)
|
Gross
profit increased $186.4 million due to increased selling prices and
the
acquisition of Gold Kist offset in part by increased cost of
feed.
|
23
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Operating
Income (Loss). Operating income (loss) for the first nine months
of fiscal 2007 increased $140.7 million when compared to the first nine months
of fiscal 2006.
The
following tables provide operating income (loss) information (in
millions):
Change
from
|
||||||||||||
Nine
|
Nine
|
|||||||||||
Months
Ended
|
Months
Ended
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||
Source
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
Change
|
|||||||||
Chicken
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
101.1
|
$ |
105.1
|
2,627.5 | % | ||||||
Mexico
|
3.2
|
13.4
|
131.4 | % | ||||||||
$ |
104.3
|
$ |
118.5
|
834.5 | % | |||||||
Turkey
|
$ |
0.9
|
$ |
16.9
|
105.6 | % | ||||||
Other
Products
|
||||||||||||
United
States
|
$ |
15.1
|
$ |
4.6
|
43.8 | % | ||||||
Mexico
|
1.9
|
0.7
|
58.3 | % | ||||||||
$ |
17.0
|
$ |
5.3
|
45.3 | % | |||||||
Operating
Income
|
$ |
122.2
|
$ |
140.7
|
760.5 | % |
Percentage
|
Percentage
|
||||||||||||||||||||
Change
from
|
of
Net Sales
|
of
Net Sales
|
|||||||||||||||||||
Nine
|
Nine
|
Nine
|
Nine
|
||||||||||||||||||
Months
Ended
|
Months
Ended
|
Percentage
|
Months
Ended
|
Months
Ended
|
|||||||||||||||||
Components
|
June
30, 2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
Change
|
June
30,
2007
|
July
1, 2006
|
||||||||||||||||
Gross
profit
|
$ |
384.7
|
$ |
186.4
|
94.0 | % | 7.1 | % | 5.1 | % | |||||||||||
Selling,
general and administrative expense
|
262.5
|
45.7
|
21.1 | % | 4.8 | % | 5.6 | % |
(a)
|
||||||||||||
Operating
income
|
$ |
122.2
|
$ |
140.7
|
760.5 | % | 2.2 | % | (0.5 | )% |
(b)
|
(a)
|
Selling,
general and administrative expense decreased as a percentage of net
sales
due primarily to added revenue from the Gold Kist
acquisition. However, overall selling, general and
administrative expense increased $45.7 million, primarily due to
the Gold
Kist acquisition and costs associated with our profit-based retirement
and
compensation plans.
|
(b)
|
Increased
operating income is primarily due to the items discussed above under
gross
profit offset by the increase in selling, general and administrative
expense.
|
Interest
Expense. Interest expense increased to $94.1 million
in the first nine months of fiscal 2007, compared to $38.4 million for the
first
nine months of fiscal 2006, due primarily to financing the Gold Kist
acquisition. As a percentage of sales, interest expense in the first
nine months of fiscal 2007 increased to 1.7% from 1.0% in the first nine months
of fiscal 2006.
24
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Interest
Income. Interest income decreased from $8.4 million in the first
nine months of fiscal 2006 to $3.2 million in the first nine months of fiscal
2007 due to decreased investments. As a percentage of sales, interest
income in the first nine months of fiscal 2007 decreased to 0.1% from 0.2%
in
the first nine months of fiscal 2006.
Early
Extinguishment of Debt. Early extinguishment of debt of $14.5
million in the second quarter of fiscal 2007 represents the premium paid of
$7.4
million and the write off of $7.1 million of unamortized loan costs related
to the repurchase of $75.7 million of our 9 1/4% Senior Subordinated Notes
due
2013, and retirement of our $450 million Bridge Loan.
Miscellaneous,
Net. Consolidated miscellaneous, net expense (income) of $(8.8)
million for the first nine months of fiscal 2007 consisted mainly of investment
and dividend income. Consolidated miscellaneous, net expense (income) for the
first nine months of fiscal 2006 was $(1.0) million.
Income
Tax (Benefit) Expense. Consolidated income tax expense in the
first nine months of fiscal 2007 was $10.5 million, compared to an income tax
benefit of $(21.7) million in the first nine months of fiscal
2006. This change resulted principally from the improvement in our
profitability during the current year.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
The
following table presents our available sources of liquidity as of June 30,
2007. See our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended
September 30, 2006 for a description of each facility discussed
below.
Facility
|
Amount
|
|||||||||||
Source
of Liquidity
|
Amount
|
Outstanding
|
Available
|
|||||||||
(in
millions)
|
||||||||||||
Cash
and cash equivalents
|
$ |
--
|
$ |
--
|
$ |
57.4
|
||||||
Investments
in available for sale securities – short-term
|
--
|
--
|
13.8
|
|||||||||
Debt
Facilities:
|
||||||||||||
Revolving
credit facilities
|
300.0
|
--
|
215.1
|
|||||||||
Revolving/term
facility
|
550.0
|
--
|
550.0
|
|||||||||
Receivables
purchase agreement
|
125.0
|
--
|
125.0
|
|||||||||
Total
available
|
$ |
961.3
|
At
June
30, 2007, our working capital, defined as current assets less current
liabilities, increased $172.8 million to $701.7 million and our current ratio
decreased to 1.74 to 1, compared with working capital of $528.8 million and
a
current ratio of 1.92 to 1 at September 30, 2006, primarily due to the working
capital changes discussed below resulting from the acquisition of Gold
Kist. See Note B – “Business Acquisition” to our notes to the
consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report.
25
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Trade
accounts and other receivables were $450.6 million at June 30, 2007, compared
to
$263.1 million at September 30, 2006, an increase of $187.5 million or 71.3%,
primarily as a result of the acquisition. In addition to the
acquisition, this increase was due to increased revenue per pound sold in the
current period.
Inventories
increased $358.7 million or 61.2% to $944.6 million at June 30, 2007, compared
to $585.9 million at September 30, 2006. In addition to the
acquisition, this increase was due to higher product costs in finished chicken
products, live inventories and feed inventories as a result of higher feed
ingredient costs.
Accounts
payable increased $111.3 million, or 37.9%, to $405.0 million at June 30, 2007,
compared to $293.7 million at September 30, 2006, primarily as a result of
the
acquisition.
Accrued
liabilities increased $267.3 million or 98.0% to $540.1 million at June 30,
2007, compared to $272.8 million at September 30, 2006, primarily as a result
of
the acquisition.
Cash
flows provided by operating activities were $52.9 million and $10.5 million
for
the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and July 1, 2006,
respectively. The increase in cash flows provided by operating
activities for the first nine months of fiscal 2007, when compared to the first
nine months of fiscal 2006, was primarily due to increased profitability and
changes in working capital items.
Cash
flows (used for) provided by investing activities were $(1,154.0) million and
$7.0 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and July 1, 2006,
respectively. Cash flows used by investing activities for the nine
months ended June 30, 2007 were primarily for the acquisition of Gold Kist
and
capital expenditures discussed below.
Capital
expenditures of $136.2 million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 were
primarily incurred to improve efficiencies, expand capacity, reduce costs and
for the routine replacement of equipment. Capital expenditures of
$101.3 million for the nine months ended July 1, 2006 were primarily incurred
to
improve efficiencies, reduce costs and for the routine replacement of
equipment. We anticipate spending approximately $170 million to $180
million in fiscal 2007 to improve efficiencies, expand capacities and for the
routine replacement of equipment. We expect to finance such
expenditures with cash on hand, available operating cash flows and existing
revolving/term and revolving credit facilities.
Cash
flows provided by (used for) financing activities were $1,002.0 million and
$(105.8) million for the nine months ended June 30, 2007 and July 1, 2006,
respectively.
In
December 2006, we borrowed $100.0 million at 6.84% under our term credit
facility and primarily used the proceeds to retire our notes payable to an
insurance company maturing in 2012 and 2013. In January 2007, we
borrowed $1,230.0 million to finance the acquisition of Gold
Kist. See Note D – “Notes Payable and Long Term Debt” to our notes to
the consolidated financial statements included elsewhere in this Quarterly
Report.
We
are a
party to many routine contracts in which we provide general indemnities in
the
normal course of business to third parties for various risks. We have
not recorded a liability for any of these indemnities, as the likelihood of
payment in each case is considered remote.
26
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Accounting
Pronouncements
Discussion
regarding our pending adoption of FIN No. 48, Accounting for
Uncertainty in Income Taxes—an interpretation of FASB Statement
No. 109, SFAS No. 157, Fair Value Measurements,
SFAS No. 158, Employers' Accounting for Defined Benefit Pension and Other
Postretirement Plans—an amendment of FASB Statements No. 87, 88, 106,
and 132(R), and SFAS No. 159, The Fair Value Option
for Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities, is included in Note A
– “Basis of Presentation” of the notes to our consolidated financial statements
included elsewhere in this Quarterly Report.
Item
3. Quantitative
and Qualitative
Disclosures About Market Risk
Feed
Ingredients
We
purchase certain commodities, primarily corn and soybean meal. As a
result, our operating results and cash flows are affected by changes in the
price and availability of such feed ingredients. As market conditions
dictate, we will from time to time lock-in future feed ingredient prices using
various hedging techniques, including forward purchase agreements with suppliers
and futures contracts.
We
do not
use such financial instruments for trading purposes and are not a party to
any
leveraged derivatives. Market risk is estimated as a hypothetical 10%
increase in the weighted-average cost of our primary feed ingredients as of
June
30, 2007. Based on our feed consumption during the nine months ended
June 30, 2007, such an increase would have resulted in an increase to cost
of
sales of approximately $148.9 million, excluding the impact of any hedging
in
that period. On a pro forma basis, a 10% increase in the aggregate
primary feed ingredients purchased by the Company and Gold Kist during the
nine
months ended June 30, 2007, would have increased cost of sales by $187.2
million.
Interest
Rates
Our
operating results are also affected by changes in interest rates due to the
impact those changes have on our variable-rate interest expense and the fair
value of our fixed-rate debt instruments. During the quarter ended
December 30, 2006, we refinanced the notes payable to insurance companies
through our term facility and entered into a U.S. Treasury Note Rate Lock
derivative with a notional amount of $300 million in anticipation of the
offering of Senior Notes issued in January 2007. During the quarter
ended March 31, 2007, we financed the acquisition of Gold Kist through the
sale
of $400 million of 7 5/8% Senior Notes due 2015, the sale of $250 million of
8
3/8% Senior Subordinated Notes due 2017 and a net draw of $580 million under
our
revolving-term secured credit agreement. That same quarter, we also
settled a U.S. Treasury Note Rate Lock for a gain of $5.7 million which will
be
reflected as a reduction to interest expense over the remaining term of such
debt obligations. Fixed-rate borrowings represented approximately 69%
of our debt portfolio at June 30, 2007 compared to 79% at September 30,
2006.
27
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Foreign
Currency
Our
operating results are affected by foreign exchange rate fluctuations related
to
the Mexico peso net monetary position of our Mexico subsidiaries. We
manage this exposure primarily by attempting to minimize our Mexico peso net
monetary position. We are also exposed to the effect of potential
exchange rate fluctuations to the extent that amounts are repatriated from
Mexico to the United States. However, we currently anticipate that
the cash flows of our Mexico subsidiaries will continue to be reinvested in
our
Mexico operations. In addition, the Mexico peso exchange rate can
directly and indirectly impact our results of operations and financial position
in several ways, including potential economic recession in Mexico resulting
from
a devalued peso. The impact on our financial position and results of
operations resulting from a hypothetical change in the exchange rate between
the
U.S. dollar and the Mexico peso cannot be reasonably
estimated. Foreign currency exchange gains and losses, representing
the change in the U.S. dollar value of the net monetary assets of our Mexico
subsidiaries denominated in Mexico pesos, was a loss of $1.3 million in the
first nine months of fiscal 2007 compared to a loss of $1.0 million for the
first nine months of fiscal 2006. On June 30, 2007, the Mexico peso
closed at 10.80 to 1 U.S. dollar, compared to 11.01 at September 30,
2006. No assurance can be given as to how future movements in the
peso could affect our future earnings.
There
have been no material changes from the information provided in Item 7A of our
Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006, other
than as described above.
Forward
Looking Statements
Statements
of our intentions, beliefs, expectations or predictions for the future, denoted
by the words "anticipate," "believe," "estimate," "expect," "project," "imply,"
"intend," "foresee" and similar expressions, are forward-looking statements
that
reflect our current views about future events and are subject to risks,
uncertainties and assumptions. Such risks, uncertainties and
assumptions include the following:
·
|
Matters
affecting the poultry industry generally, including fluctuations
in the
commodity prices of feed ingredients, chicken and
turkey;
|
·
|
Additional
outbreaks of avian influenza or other diseases, either in our own
flocks
or elsewhere, affecting our ability to conduct our operations and/or
demand for our poultry products;
|
·
|
Contamination
of our products, which has previously and can in the future lead
to
product liability claims and product
recalls;
|
·
|
Exposure
to risks related to product liability, product recalls, property
damage
and injuries to persons, for which insurance coverage is expensive,
limited and potentially inadequate;
|
·
|
Management
of our cash resources, particularly in light of our substantial
leverage;
|
·
|
Restrictions
imposed by, and as a result of, our substantial
leverage;
|
·
|
Changes
in laws or regulations affecting our operations or the application
thereof;
|
·
|
New
immigration legislation or increased enforcement efforts in connection
with existing immigration legislation could cause our costs of business
to
increase, cause us to change the way in which we do business or otherwise
disrupt our operations;
|
·
|
Competitive
factors and pricing pressures or the loss of one or more of our largest
customers;
|
·
|
Inability
to consummate, or effectively integrate, any acquisition, including
integrating our recent acquisition of Gold Kist, or realize the associated
cost savings and operating
synergies;
|
·
|
Currency
exchange rate fluctuations, trade barriers, exchange controls,
expropriation and other risks associated with foreign
operations;
|
·
|
The
impact of uncertainties of litigation as well as other risks described
herein and under “Risk Factors” in our Annual Report on Form 10-K and
subsequent reports filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission.
|
28
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Actual
results could differ materially from those projected in these forward-looking
statements as a result of these factors, among others, many of which are beyond
our control.
In
making
these statements, we are not undertaking, and specifically decline to undertake,
any obligation to address or update any forward-looking statement or any such
factor in future filings or communications regarding our business or results,
and we are not undertaking to address how any of these factors may have caused
changes to information contained in previous filings or
communications. Although we have attempted to list comprehensively
these important cautionary risk factors, we must caution investors and others
that other factors may in the future prove to be important and affecting our
business or results of operations.
Item
4. Controls
and Procedures
An
evaluation was performed under the supervision and with the participation of
the
Company’s management, including the Senior Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of
the
Company’s “disclosure controls and procedures” (as defined in Rules 13a-15(e)
and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (the “Exchange Act”)) as
of the end of the period covered by this Quarterly Report on Form
10-Q. Based on that evaluation, the Company’s management, including
the Senior Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer,
concluded that the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective
to ensure that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed,
summarized and reported within the time periods specified in Securities and
Exchange Commission rules and forms, and that information we are required to
disclose in our reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission
is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Senior
Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer, as
appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosure.
On
December 27, 2006, we acquired 88.87% of the outstanding common stock of Gold
Kist and on January 9, 2007, we acquired all remaining shares of Gold
Kist. We believe that the internal controls and procedures of Gold
Kist have a material effect on our internal control over financial
reporting. See Note B – “Business Acquisition” to our notes to
consolidated financial statements contained in this Quarterly Report for further
details of the transaction. We are currently in the process of
assessing and integrating Gold Kist’s internal controls over financial reporting
into our financial reporting systems.
In
connection with the evaluation described above, the Company’s management,
including the Senior Chairman, Chief Executive Officer and Chief Financial
Officer, identified no other change in the Company's internal control over
financial reporting that occurred during the Company’s fiscal quarter ended June
30, 2007, and that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to
materially affect, the Company’s internal controls over financial
reporting.
29
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
PART
II. OTHER INFORMATION
Item
1. Legal
Proceedings
On
July
1, 2002, three individuals, on behalf of themselves and a putative class of
chicken growers, filed their original class action complaint against the Company
in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Texas, Texarkana
Division, styled “Cody Wheeler, et al. vs. Pilgrim’s Pride
Corporation.” In their lawsuit, plaintiffs initially alleged that the
Company violated the Packers and Stockyards Act (“PSA”) (7 U.S.C. Section 192)
and breached fiduciary duties allegedly owed to the plaintiff
growers. The plaintiffs also brought individual actions under the
Packers and Stockyards Act alleging, among other things, breach of fiduciary
duties and breach of contract. On September 30, 2005, plaintiffs
amended their lawsuit to join Tyson Foods, Inc. as a
co-defendant. Two additional former chicken growers were also added
as plaintiffs to the lawsuit. This amendment, which occurred 38
months after the lawsuit’s initial filing, virtually re-wrote most of the
allegations. Now the plaintiffs contend that the Company and Tyson
are involved in a conspiracy to violate federal antitrust laws. The
plaintiffs’ initial allegations, although still contained in the amended
lawsuit, are no longer the sole focus of the case. On January 3,
2006, the Court entered an Order severing the plaintiffs’ Packers and Stockyards
Act and antitrust claims. The Court ordered that the plaintiffs may
proceed with their Packers and Stockyards Act claims as set forth in Plaintiffs’
Third Amended Complaint. The Court also ordered that the plaintiffs
may proceed with their respective antitrust claims asserted against the Company
and Tyson in a separate cause of action styled “Cody Wheeler, et al vs.
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, et al.” On March 6, 2006, the plaintiffs
filed their motion for class certification in the original
lawsuit. Pilgrim’s Pride attacked the plaintiffs’ class certification
brief on several grounds, and ultimately the plaintiffs voluntarily withdrew
their Motion for Class Certification on May 26, 2006. As a result,
the Court canceled the class certification hearing and on June 2, 2006 the
Court
entered an Order withdrawing Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification and
prohibiting the plaintiffs from filing any additional class-action claims
against Pilgrim’s Pride in this lawsuit. Additionally, the two former
growers who joined the lawsuit on September 30, 2005 withdrew from the
case. On March 30, 2007, the Court issued an order granting in part
and denying in part the Company’s pending motion for summary
judgment. In the order, the Court ruled that plaintiffs do not have
to demonstrate an adverse effect on competition in order to prevail under the
PSA. This ruling is inconsistent with many other jurisdictions’
interpretation of the PSA. The Court issued an order staying the
lawsuit until the issue is decided by the Fifth Circuit. On June 29,
2007, the Fifth Circuit accepted the appeal. The Company is currently
awaiting a briefing schedule to be issued by the Fifth Circuit. The
Company intends to defend vigorously against the plaintiffs’ individual
claims. The Company does not expect this matter to have a material
impact on its financial position, operations or liquidity.
On
January 3, 2006, an action styled "Cody Wheeler, et al. vs. Pilgrim's Pride
Corporation, et al.," arising out of the original Wheeler litigation described
above, was filed in the United States District Court for the Eastern District
of
Texas, Texarkana Division. The lawsuit was filed by the three
original plaintiffs and a former grower, both in their individual capacities
and
on behalf of a putative class of chicken growers. In the lawsuit, the
four plaintiffs allege that the Company and Tyson are involved in a conspiracy
to violate federal antitrust laws. A hearing on plaintiffs’ motion
for class certification was held on February 8, 2007, and the parties are
currently awaiting the Court’s ruling. The Company intends to defend
vigorously both the certification of the case as a class action and the merits
of the four plaintiffs’ individual claims. The Company does not
expect this matter to have a material impact on its financial position,
operations or liquidity.
30
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
On
December 31, 2003, we were served with a purported class action complaint styled
“Angela Goodwin, Gloria Willis, Johnny Gill, Greg Hamilton, Nathan Robinson,
Eddie Gusby, Pat Curry, Persons Similarly Situated v. ConAgra Poultry Company
and Pilgrim’s Pride, Incorporated” in the United States District Court, Western
District of Arkansas, El Dorado Division, alleging racial and age discrimination
at one of the facilities we acquired from ConAgra. Two of the named
plaintiffs, Greg Hamilton and Gloria Willis, were voluntarily dismissed from
this action. The Company deposed all of the remaining plaintiffs
and filed individual motions for summary judgment against each of
them. On March 28, 2006, the Court issued Orders concerning the
motions for summary judgment that postponed the rulings on them until after
it
decided the class certification issue. However, the Court granted the
Company’s motion against Plaintiff Robert Nelson and dismissed all of his claims
in their entirety based on the theory of judicial estoppel. The Court
heard oral argument on the Plaintiffs’ Class Certification Motion on August 11,
2006, and the Court took the matter under advisement. On May 15,
2007, the Court issued its order denying Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class
Certification in its entirety. The plaintiffs subsequently withdrew
their petition to appeal to the Eight Circuit Court of Appeals. Thus,
the Court’s order denying plaintiffs’ class certification motion stands as a
final, binding judgment. On July 18, 2007, the Court ordered the
remaining six individual Plaintiffs to file their own individual lawsuits
without any class action allegations. Accordingly, the Company will
re-file those motions for summary judgment after plaintiffs file their
individual complaints. The Company intends to defend vigorously
against the Plaintiffs’ individual claims. We believe we have
meritorious defenses to these individual claims and intend to vigorously defend
these claims. The ultimate liability with respect to these claims
cannot be determined at this time; however, we do not expect this matter to
have
a material impact on our financial position, operations or
liquidity.
The
Wage
and Hour Division of the U.S. Department of Labor conducted an industry wide
investigation to ascertain compliance with various wage and hour issues,
including the compensation of employees for the time spent on such activities
such as donning and doffing work equipment. Due, in part, to the
government investigation and the recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in IBP,
Inc. v. Alvarez, employees have brought claims against the
Company. The claims filed against us as of the date of this report
include: “Juan Garcia, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, a/k/a
Wampler Foods, Inc.”, filed in Pennsylvania state court on January 27, 2006 and
subsequently removed to the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of
Pennsylvania; “Esperanza Moya, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation and Maxi
Staff, LLC”, filed March 23, 2006 in the Eastern District of Pennsylvania;
“Barry Antee, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed April 20, 2006 in the
Eastern District of Texas; “Stephania Aaron, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride
Corporation” filed August 22, 2006 in the Western District of Arkansas;
“Salvador Aguilar, et al. v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed August 23, 2006
in the Northern District of Alabama; “Benford v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation”
filed November 2, 2006 in the Northern District of Alabama; “Porter v. Pilgrim’s
Pride Corporation” filed December 7, 2006 in the Eastern District of Tennessee;
“Freida Brown, et al v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed March 14, 2007 in the
Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division; “Roy Menser, et al v. Pilgrim’s
Pride Corporation” filed February 28, 2007 in the Western District of Paducah,
KY; “Victor Manuel Hernandez v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed January 30,
2007 in the Northern District of Georgia, Rome Division; “Angela Allen et al v.
Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation” filed March 27, 2007 in United States District
Court, Middle District of Georgia, Athens Division; Daisy Hammond and
Felicia Pope v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, in the Gainesville Division,
Northern District of Georgia Athens Division, filed on June 6, 2007; Gary Price
v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, in the U.S. District Court for the Northern
District of Georgia, Atlanta Division, filed on May 21, 2007; and Kristin
Roebuck et al v. Pilgrim’s Pride Corporation, in the U.S. District Court,
Athens, Georgia, Middle District, filed on May 23, 2007. The
plaintiffs generally purport to bring a collective action for unpaid wages,
unpaid overtime wages, liquidated damages, costs, attorneys' fees, and
declaratory and/or injunctive relief and generally allege that they are not
paid
for the time it takes to either clear security, walk to their respective
workstations, don and doff protective clothing, and/or sanitize clothing and
equipment. The presiding judge in the consolidated action in El Dorado
which now includes nearly all of the aforementioned cases, issued an initial
Case Management order on July 9, 2007. It ordered Plaintiffs’ counsel
to file a Consolidated Amended Complaint by July 20, 2007. It further
ordered the parties to file a Joint Rule 26(f) Report by August 20,
2007. A scheduling order has not been issued and discovery has
not yet commenced. The Plaintiffs have not yet filed their motion for
conditional class certification and notice in the consolidated case to putative
collective members has not yet been issued. As of the date of this
Quarterly Report, the following suits have been filed against Gold Kist, which
make one or more of the allegations referenced above: Merrell v. Gold Kist,
Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia,
Gainesville Division, filed on December 21, 2006; Harris v. Gold Kist, Inc.,
in
the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Newnan Division,
filed on December 21, 2006; Blanke v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District
Court for the Southern District of Georgia, Waycross Division, filed on December
21, 2006; Clarke v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Middle
District of Georgia, Athens Division, filed on December 21, 2006; Atchison
v.
Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of
Alabama, Middle Division, filed on October 3, 2006; Carlisle v. Gold Kist,
Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama, Middle
Division, filed on October 2, 2006; Benbow v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S.
District Court for the District of South Carolina, Columbia Division, filed
on
October 2, 2006; Bonds v. Gold Kist, Inc., in the U.S. District Court for the
Northern District of Alabama, Northwestern Division, filed on October 2,
2006. On April 23, 2007, Pilgrim’s filed a Motion to Transfer and
Consolidate with the Judicial Panel on Multidistrict Litigation (“JPML”)
requesting that all of the pending Gold Kist cases be consolidated into one
case. Pilgrim’s withdrew its Motion subject to the Plaintiffs’
counsel’s agreement to consolidate the seven separate actions into the pending
Benbow case by dismissing those lawsuits and refiling/consolidating
them into the Benbow action. Motions to Dismiss have been
filed in all of the pending seven cases, and nearly all of these cases have
been
formally dismissed. Pursuant to the Court’s April 16 Order, the
parties reached agreement on the terms of class notice. Discovery has
not yet commenced therein. The Company believes that it has
meritorious defenses to the consolidated lawsuit, and intends to assert a
vigorous defense to the litigation. The ultimate liability with
respect to these cases cannot be determined at this time. These cases
are in various stages of litigation which we intend to vigorously
defend.
We
are
subject to various other legal proceedings and claims, which arise in the
ordinary course of our business. In the opinion of management, the
amount of ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially
affect our financial position or results of operations.
31
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Item
1A. Risk
Factors.
In
addition to the other information set forth in this Quarterly Report, you should
carefully consider the risks discussed in our Annual
Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September 30, 2006 including
under
the heading "Item 1A. Risk Factors", which risks could materially affect the
Company’s business, financial condition or future results. The risk
factors below update, and should be read in conjunction with, the risk factors
disclosed in our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended September
30, 2006. These risks are not the only risks facing the
Company. Additional risks and uncertainties not currently known to
the Company or that it currently deems to be immaterial also may materially
adversely affect the Company's business, financial condition or future
results.
Cyclicality
and Commodity Prices—Industry cyclicality can affect our earnings, especially
due to fluctuations in commodity prices of feed ingredients, chicken and
turkey.
Profitability
in the chicken and turkey industries is materially affected by the commodity
prices of feed ingredients, chicken and turkey, which are determined by supply
and demand factors. As a result, the chicken and turkey industries
are subject to cyclical earnings fluctuations.
The
production of feed ingredients is positively or negatively affected primarily
by
weather patterns throughout the world, the global level of supply inventories
and demand for feed ingredients, and the agricultural policies of the U.S.
and
foreign governments. In particular, weather patterns often change
agricultural conditions in an unpredictable manner. A sudden and
significant change in weather patterns could affect supplies of feed
ingredients, as well as both the industry’s and our ability to obtain feed
ingredients, grow chickens and turkeys or deliver products.
The
cost
of corn, our primary feed ingredient, increased significantly from August 2006
to the date of this Quarterly Report, and there can be no assurance that the
price of corn will not continue to rise as a result of, among other things,
increasing demand for corn products around the world and alternative uses of
corn, such as ethanol production.
High
feed
ingredient prices have had a material adverse effect on our operating
results. We periodically seek, to the extent available, to enter into
advance purchase commitments or financial hedging contracts for the purchase
of
feed ingredients in an effort to manage our feed ingredient
costs. The use of such instruments may not be
successful.
We
also
seek to adjust our operations in response to high feed prices and other cyclical
factors. On October 29, 2006, we announced that we would reduce weekly
chicken processing by 5.0% year-over-year, or approximately 1.3 million
head per week by January 2007, as part of our continuing effort to better
balance supply and demand amid declining chicken prices and sharply higher
costs
for corn. Although industry chicken prices have risen in recent
months, there can be no assurance that corn and other feed ingredient prices
will not continue to rise or that chicken prices will not decline.
32
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Substantial
Leverage—Our substantial indebtedness could adversely affect our financial
condition.
Our
acquisition of Gold Kist increased our indebtedness significantly. We
currently have a substantial amount of indebtedness. Our substantial
indebtedness could adversely affect our financial condition which could have
important consequences to you. For example, it could:
·
|
Make
it more difficult for us to satisfy our obligations under our debt
securities;
|
·
|
Increase
our vulnerability to general adverse economic
conditions;
|
·
|
Limit
our ability to obtain necessary financing and to fund future working
capital, capital expenditures and other general corporate
requirements;
|
·
|
Require
us to dedicate a substantial portion of our cash flow from operations
to
payments on our indebtedness, thereby reducing the availability of
our
cash flow to fund working capital, capital expenditures and for other
general corporate purposes;
|
·
|
Limit
our flexibility in planning for, or reacting to, changes in our business
and the industry in which we
operate;
|
·
|
Place
us at a competitive disadvantage compared to our competitors that
have
less debt;
|
·
|
Limit
our ability to pursue acquisitions and sell assets;
and
|
·
|
Limit,
along with the financial and other restrictive covenants in our
indebtedness, our ability to borrow additional funds. Failing
to comply with those covenants could result in an event of default
or
require redemption of indebtedness. Either of these events
could have a material adverse effect on
us.
|
Our
ability to make payments on and to refinance our indebtedness will depend on
our
ability to generate cash in the future, which is dependent on various
factors. These factors include the commodity prices of feed
ingredients, chicken and turkey and general economic, financial, competitive,
legislative, regulatory and other factors that are beyond our
control.
Additional
Borrowings Available—Despite our substantial indebtedness, we may still be able
to incur significantly more debt; this could intensify the risks described
above.
Despite
our significant indebtedness, we are not prohibited from incurring additional
indebtedness in the future. If additional debt is added to our
current substantial debt levels, the related risks that we now face could
intensify.
Integration
of Gold Kist—There can be no assurance that Gold Kist can be combined
successfully with our business.
In
evaluating the terms of our acquisition of Gold Kist, we analyzed the respective
businesses of Pilgrim’s Pride and Gold Kist and made certain assumptions
concerning their respective future operations. A principal assumption
was that the acquisition will produce operating results better than those
historically experienced or presently expected to be experienced in the future
by us in the absence of the acquisition. There can be no assurance,
however, that this assumption is correct or that the businesses of Pilgrim’s
Pride and Gold Kist will be successfully integrated in a timely
manner.
33
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Synergies
of Gold Kist—There can be no assurance that we will achieve anticipated
synergies from our acquisition of Gold Kist.
We
consummated the Gold Kist acquisition with the expectation that it will result
in beneficial synergies, such as cost savings and enhanced
growth. Success in realizing these benefits and the timing of this
realization depend upon the successful integration of the operations of Gold
Kist into Pilgrim's Pride, and upon general and industry-specific economic
factors. The integration of two independent companies is a complex,
costly and time-consuming process. The difficulties of combining the
operations of the companies include, among others:
·
|
Transitioning
and preserving Gold Kist's customer, contractor, supplier and other
important third party
relationships;
|
·
|
Integrating
corporate and administrative
infrastructures;
|
·
|
Coordinating
sales and marketing functions;
|
·
|
Minimizing
the diversion of management's attention from ongoing business
concerns;
|
·
|
Coordinating
geographically separate organizations;
and
|
·
|
Retaining
key employees.
|
Even
if
Pilgrim's Pride and Gold Kist are able to integrate their operations and
economic conditions remain stable, there can be no assurance that the
anticipated synergies will be achieved.
Immigration
Legislation and Enforcement—New immigration legislation or increased enforcement
efforts in connection with existing immigration legislation could cause our
costs of doing business to increase, cause us to change the way in which we
do
business or otherwise disrupt our operations.
Immigration
reform continues to attract significant attention in the public arena and the
United States Congress. If new federal immigration legislation is
enacted or if states in which we do business enact immigration laws, such laws
may contain provisions that could make it more difficult or costly for us to
hire United States citizens and/or legal immigrant workers. In such
case, we may incur additional costs to run our business or may have to change
the way we conduct our operations, either of which could have a material adverse
effect on our business, operating results and financial
condition. Also, despite our past and continuing efforts to hire only
United States citizens and/or persons legally authorized to work in the United
States, increased enforcement efforts with respect to existing immigration
laws
by governmental authorities may disrupt a portion of our workforce or our
operations at one or more of our facilities, thereby negatively impacting our
business.
Government
Regulation—Regulation, present and future, is a constant factor affecting our
business.
The
chicken and turkey industries are subject to federal, state and local
governmental regulations, including in the health and environmental
areas. We anticipate increased regulation by various agencies
concerning food safety, the use of medication in feed formulations, and the
disposal of poultry by-products and wastewater discharges.
34
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Also,
changes in laws or regulations or the application thereof may lead to government
enforcement actions and resulting litigation by private litigants. We
are aware of an industry-wide investigation by the Wage and Hour Division of
the
U.S. Department of Labor to ascertain compliance with various wage and hour
issues, including the compensation of employees for the time spent on such
activities such as donning and doffing work equipment. We have been
named as a defendant in a number of related suits brought by
employees. Due, in part, to the government investigation and the
recent U.S. Supreme Court decision in IBP, Inc. v. Alvarez, it is
possible that we may be subject to additional employee claims.
Unknown
matters, new laws and regulations, or stricter interpretations of existing
laws
or regulations may materially affect our business or operations in the
future.
35
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Item
6. Exhibits
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended October 2, 2004 filed on November 24,
2004).
|
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-111929) filed on January 15, 2004).
|
|
10.1
|
Fourth
Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2007, by and among
the
Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication
agent, and the sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation
and
collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as
syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory
thereto.*
|
|
12.1
|
Statement
regarding Computation of Ratios.*
|
|
31.1
|
Certification
of Co-Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
31.2
|
Certification
of Co-Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
31.3
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.*
|
|
32.1
|
Certification
of Co-Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
32.2
|
Certification
of Co-Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
32.3
|
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation pursuant
to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
|
*
Filed herewith
|
36
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
Pursuant
to the requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant
has
duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned thereunto
duly authorized.
PILGRIM’S
PRIDE CORPORATION
|
|||
/s/
Richard A. Cogdill
|
|||
Date:
|
July
31, 2007
|
Richard
A. Cogdill
|
|
Chief
Financial Officer, Secretary
and Treasurer
|
|||
(Principal
Financial Officer, Chief
Accounting Officer and Authorized
Signatory)
|
37
PILGRIM'S
PRIDE CORPORATION
June
30,
2007
EXHIBIT
INDEX
3.1
|
Certificate
of Incorporation of the Company, as amended (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 3.1 of the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the
fiscal year ended October 2, 2004 filed on November 24,
2004).
|
|
3.2
|
Amended
and Restated Corporate Bylaws of the Company (incorporated by reference
from Exhibit 4.4 of the Company’s Registration Statement on Form S-8 (No.
333-111929) filed on January 15, 2004).
|
|
Fourth
Amendment to Credit Agreement, dated as of July 3, 2007, by and among
the
Company as borrower, CoBank, ACB, as lead arranger and co-syndication
agent, and the sole book runner, and as administrative, documentation
and
collateral agent, Agriland, FCS, as co-syndication agent, and as
syndication party, and the other syndication parties signatory
thereto.*
|
||
Statement
regarding Computation of Ratios.*
|
||
Certification
of Co-Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
||
Certification
of Co-Principal Executive Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the
Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
||
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer pursuant to Section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley
Act of 2002.*
|
||
Certification
of Co-Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
||
Certification
of Co-Principal Executive Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation
pursuant
to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
||
Certification
of Chief Financial Officer of Pilgrim's Pride Corporation pursuant
to
Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.*
|
||
*
Filed herewith
|
38